ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers
Augusta Resource Corp. Ordinary Shares (Canada)

Augusta Resource Corp. Ordinary Shares (Canada) (AZC)

0.00
0.00
(0.00%)
Closed April 19 4:00PM
0.00
0.00
( 0.00% )

Unlock more advanced trading tools

Join ADVFN today

Key stats and details

Current Price
-
Bid
-
Ask
-
Volume
-
0.00 Day's Range 0.00
0.00 52 Week Range 0.00
Previous Close
-
Open
-
Last Trade
Last Trade Time
-
Average Volume (3m)
-
Financial Volume
-
VWAP
-

AZC Latest News

No news to show yet.
PeriodChangeChange %OpenHighLowAvg. Daily VolVWAP
10000000DE
40000000DE
120000000DE
260000000DE
520000000DE
1560000000DE
2600000000DE

Market Movers

View all
  • Most Active
  • % Gainers
  • % Losers
SymbolPriceVol.
RWODRedwoods Acquisition Corporation
$ 28.60
(257.65%)
386.13k
ZCMDZhongchao Inc
$ 2.52
(73.79%)
2.01M
WLGSWang and Lee Group Inc
$ 0.7431
(48.62%)
274.13k
NUTXNutex Health Inc
$ 0.88
(34.33%)
3.2k
KAKineta Inc
$ 0.599
(23.23%)
16.2k
MBOTMicrobot Medical Inc
$ 0.36
(-59.55%)
24
BGLCBioNexus Gene Lab Corporation
$ 0.66
(-22.22%)
29.92k
ISPCiSpecimen Inc
$ 0.3396
(-19.33%)
102.84k
TIRXTian Ruixiang Holdings Ltd
$ 0.6598
(-17.53%)
133.02k
AGBAAGBA Group Holding Ltd
$ 0.88
(-14.56%)
264.6k
HUBCHub Cyber Security Ltd
$ 1.58
(22.48%)
2.21M
ZCMDZhongchao Inc
$ 2.52
(73.79%)
2.01M
SQQQProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
$ 12.28
(1.74%)
1.95M
SINTSiNtx Technologies Inc
$ 0.0385
(-3.75%)
1.31M
SPCBSuperCom Ltd
$ 0.29
(20.83%)
1.26M

AZC Discussion

View Posts
SteveWin SteveWin 6 years ago
https://seekingalpha.com/article/2517035-update-hudbay-completes-its-acquisition-of-augusta-resources
👍️0
stocktrademan stocktrademan 10 years ago
Augusta Resources Corp. [$AZC] due diligence

bullish




$AZC

DD Notes ~ http://www.ddnotesmaker.com/AZC

##### recent news/filings ~ source: finance.yahoo.com

Wed, 02 Jul 2014 21:34:53 GMT ~ July 2, 2014 Hudbay and Augusta Announce Filing of Offer Documents for Friendly Acquisition
[at noodls] - Download this Press Release (PDF 307 KB ) TORONTO, July 2, 2014 /CNW/ - HudBay Minerals Inc. ("Hudbay") (TSX, NYSE: HBM)and Augusta Resource Corporation ("Augusta") (TSX, NYSE MKT: ...
read full: http://www.noodls.com/view/8231F0BBF8B9FBDD7BC5D36D87D6F350D364B783
*********************************************************

Wed, 02 Jul 2014 20:49:31 GMT ~ Augusta, Hudbay file offer documents for friendly acquisition
read full: http://www.theflyonthewall.com/permalinks/entry.php/AZC;HBMid2033336/AZC;HBM-Augusta-Hudbay-file-offer-documents-for-friendly-acquisition-
*********************************************************

Wed, 02 Jul 2014 20:46:06 GMT ~ Hudbay and Augusta Announce Filing of Offer Documents for Friendly Acquisition
[Marketwired] - HudBay Minerals Inc. and Augusta Resource Corporation today announced the filing of Hudbay's Notice of Variation and Extension and Augusta's Notice of Change to Directors' Circular in connection with Hudbay's ...
read full: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/hudbay-augusta-announce-filing-offer-204606506.html
*********************************************************

Wed, 02 Jul 2014 20:45:00 GMT ~ Hudbay and Augusta Announce Filing of Offer Documents for Friendly Acquisition
[PR Newswire] - TORONTO, July 2, 2014 /PRNewswire/ - HudBay Minerals Inc. ("Hudbay") (TSX, NYSE: HBM) and Augusta Resource Corporation ("Augusta") (TSX, NYSE MKT: AZC) today announced the filing of Hudbay's Notice of Variation and Extension and Augusta's Notice of Change to Directors' Circular in connection with Hudbay's revised offer to acquire all of the outstanding common shares of Augusta ("Augusta Shares") not already owned by Hudbay or its affiliates for consideration per Augusta Share of 0.315 of a common share of Hudbay and 0.17 of a warrant to acquire a common share of Hudbay (the "Revised Offer"). As previously announced, Augusta's Board of Directors is unanimously recommending that Augusta shareholders accept the Revised Offer and has agreed to terminate Augusta's Shareholder Rights Plan to permit shareholders to do so.
read full: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/hudbay-augusta-announce-filing-offer-204500399.html
*********************************************************

Wed, 02 Jul 2014 20:45:00 GMT ~ Hudbay and Augusta Announce Filing of Offer Documents for Friendly Acquisition
[CNW Group] - Hudbay and Augusta Announce Filing of Offer Documents for Friendly Acquisition
read full: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/hudbay-augusta-announce-filing-offer-204500983.html
*********************************************************

##### chart ~ source: stockcharts.com



##### chart ~ source: eoddata.com



##### company info ~ source: otcmarkets.com

Link: http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/AZC/company-info
Ticker: $AZC
OTC Market Place: Not Available
CIK code: 0001353123
Company name: Augusta Resources Corp.
Company website: http://www.augustaresource.com
Incorporated In: Canada

##### extra dd links

Edgar filings: http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001353123&owner=exclude&count=40
Latest filings: http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/AZC/filings
Latest financials: http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/AZC/financials
Latest news: http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/AZC/news - http://finance.yahoo.com/q/h?s=AZC+Headlines

Major holdings: http://data.cnbc.com/quotes/AZC/tab/8.1
Insider transactions (1): http://finance.yahoo.com/q/it?s=AZC+Insider+Transactions
Insider transactions (2): http://www.secform4.com/insider-trading/AZC.htm
Insider transactions (3): http://www.insidercow.com/history/company.jsp?company=AZC

RegSho: http://www.regsho.com/tools/symbol_stats.php?sym=AZC&search=search

DTCC: http://search2.dtcc.com/?q=Augusta+Resources+Corp.&x=10&y=8&sp_p=all&sp_f=ISO-8859-1
Spoke company information: http://www.spoke.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=Augusta+Resources+Corp.
Corporation WIKI: http://www.corporationwiki.com/search/results?term=Augusta+Resources+Corp.&x=0&y=0
WHOIS: http://whois.domaintools.com/http://www.augustaresource.com
Alexa: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/http://www.augustaresource.com#
Corporate website internet archive: http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.augustaresource.com

Short Sales: http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/AZC/short-sales
Insider Disclosure: http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/AZC/insider-transactions
Research Reports: http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/AZC/research
Historical Prices: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=AZC+Historical+Prices
Basic Tech. Analysis: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ta?s=AZC+Basic+Tech.+Analysis
Company Profile: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/pr?s=AZC+Profile
Key Statistics: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=AZC+Key+Statistics
Industry: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/in?s=AZC+Industry
Insider Roster: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ir?s=AZC+Insider+Roster
Income Statement: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=AZC
Balance Sheet: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=AZC
Cash Flow: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/cf?s=AZC+Cash+Flow&annual
Market Watch: http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/AZC
Bloomberg: http://www.bloomberg.com/quote/AZC:US
Morningstar: http://quotes.morningstar.com/stock/s?t=AZC
Bussinessweek: http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot_article.asp?ticker=AZC
Barchart: http://www.barchart.com/quotes/stocks/AZC
OTC Short Report: http://otcshortreport.com/index.php?index=AZC
Investopedia: http://www.investopedia.com/markets/stocks/AZC/?wa=0

http://www.pennystocktweets.com/stocks/profile/AZC

##### last known share structure ~ source: otcmarkets.com

Market Value: $497,261,549 a/o Jul 08, 2014
Shares Outstanding: 144,552,776 a/o Dec 31, 2013
Float: Not Available
Authorized Shares: Not Available
Par Value: No Par Value

##### business description ~ source: otcmarkets.com



DD Notes ~ http://www.ddnotesmaker.com/AZC
pre110
👍️0
shanak10 shanak10 10 years ago
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=62657732
👍️0
AZCUminer AZCUminer 10 years ago
http://www.tucsonnewsnow.com/story/25793062/forest-service-responds-to-rosemont-copper-mine-objections

Nice step in the right direction. Good to see the Forest service isnt bowing down to the loud minority.
👍️0
AZCUminer AZCUminer 10 years ago
Just out on Etrade.

Offer Extended to 4/2/14

Augusta Resource Corp
Cutoff Date: 3/31/14 5:00 PM
Hudbay Minerals Inc., offers to purchase all of the issued and outstanding
common shares of Augusta resource corporation for consideration per
Augusta share of 0.315 of a Hudbay common share. The offeror will not issue
fractional Hudbay shares. instead, fractions will rounded to the nearest
whole Hudbay share.
Offer has been extended to 4/2/14.
👍️0
rbtree rbtree 10 years ago
Feds: Rosemont Copper behind in paying firefighting bill

10 hours ago • By Tony DavisLoading…
Rosemont Copper Co. and a Rosemont ranch hand haven’t yet paid a
$514,000 debt they have jointly owed the U.S. Forest Service since
August for its expenses fighting a 2011 wildfire started accidentally by
the ranch hand.

The wildfire burned about 1,826 acres on public and private land after
the ranch hand’s welding activity sent a spark onto grassland that
ignited the blaze.

After a lengthy investigation, the Forest Service demanded the $514,000
payment on Aug. 31, 2013, in letters to the mining company and the ranch
hand, Eric Pavolka.

In a Jan. 31 letter this year, Southwestern Regional Forester Calvin
Joyner wrote that the Forest Service’s Claims Office still hadn’t heard
from Rosemont Copper about the debt. The Star recently obtained that
letter and several investigative reports about the fire through the
federal Freedom of Information Act.

But late Friday, in response to follow-up questions from the Star, the
Forest Service took a different stance. A spokesman in the service’s
Washington, D.C., office said that Rosemont Copper had requested
documentation from the service to support its bill — “a standard
practice in these types of cases. The requested records and documents
were recently provided to Rosemont Copper. We are currently awaiting
their review of these records before proceeding further.”

That statement from Forest Service spokesman Lawrence Chambers didn’t
say whether Rosemont Copper sought the documentation before or after
Jan. 31. Service officials said they couldn’t answer such questions
Friday.

Rod Pace, the mining company’s president and CEO, told the Star on
Friday that the Forest Service’s claim “is being handled by our
insurance company and I am unaware there are any issues. We assume the
insurance company is processing the information and will certainly
inquire if it is not handled in a timely manner.”

The fire, in May 2011, started on private property and spread onto
national forest lands, the Forest Service said in its letter last August
to Rosemont Copper. The fire started when ranch hand Pavolka was welding
metal tabs on metal stakes in the bed of a truck owned by Rosemont
Ranch, Forest Service reports say.

The mining company grazes cattle on that 30,000-acre ranch, mostly on
federal land. The ranch southeast of Tucson spans grasslands and oak
woodlands east of the Santa Rita Mountains and west of Arizona 83.

Other service reports said that the ranch hand who set off the fire —
who wasn’t named in those reports — said he tried to put the blaze out
by shoveling dirt on it, and he radioed the ranch for help.

The fire, spread by winds gusting up to 31 mph, didn’t burn structures
but came to within 75 yards of a ranch house on private land, a
Sonoita-Elgin Fire District official said at the time.

The Forest Service’s August 2013 letters to Pace and Pavolka said that
Pavolka and the owners of Rosemont Ranch are “jointly and severally
liable for the full amount of this debt,” because the government doesn’t
attempt to allocate each party’s share.

Pavolka’s actions also violated a federal law prohibiting actions
causing “timber, trees, slash, brush or grass to burn except as
authorized by permit,” said the August 2013 Forest Service letter from
Lisa Lux, branch chief for the service’s claims office.

On May 3, 2012, Pavolka apparently signed a plea agreement in which he
agreed to pay a $100 fine and a $10 special assessment on the charge of
the federal law violation. He was placed on five years’ probation. The
plea agreement obtained by the Star redacted the defendant’s name. But
its description of how the fire occurred matches the Forest Service’s
August 2013 letter to Pavolka that named him as the person who set off
the fire.

Pavolka, who still works for Rosemont Copper, declined to be
interviewed, company spokeswoman Jan Howard said Friday.

In its letters last August to Rosemont CEO Pace and to Pavolka, the
Forest Service wrote that to avoid having to pay interest, having the
debt reported to credit bureaus or having a collection agency called,
the company or Pavolka must within 30 days pay the debt in full, agree
to a payment plan or document that they are in a bankruptcy proceeding
that would place the debt on hold.

Rosemont officials have acknowledged since summer 2011 that one of their
ranch hands started the fire. Pace said back then that the ranch hand
had followed procedures for the welding work that were outlined in the
ranch’s grazing permit.

“If we are found responsible, we are certainly going to” pay a fine,
Pace said back then.

Activists opposed to the proposed Rosemont Mine said at the time that
they believed the mining company was negligent and should pay a fine.
They said they were disappointed that Rosemont Copper hadn’t offered to
pay.
👍️0
rbtree rbtree 10 years ago
FYI:

Groups Send Letter to Elected Officials Asking They Oppose Rosemont Mine
Posted on January 21, 2014

A dozen Arizona and national environmental groups have sent a joint letter to elected officials requesting them to oppose the construction of the proposed $1.23 billion Rosemont open-pit copper mine in the Santa Rita Mountains on the Coronado National Forest southeast of Tucson.

“We are writing to express our continued strong opposition to the proposed Rosemont Mine and to urge you to join with us in our effort to stop it,” states the letter sent last week to elected officials. “We are engaged in this process because the Rosemont Mine poses such a serious threat to southern Arizona’s water supplies, air quality, wildlife, cultural heritage, and local economies.”
Vancouver, B.C.-based Augusta Resource Corporation is seeking permits through its Arizona subsidiary Rosemont Copper Company to construct the mile-wide, half-mile deep mine and plans to export the copper overseas.
The mine site would destroy more than 4,000 acres of National Forest and directly or indirectly damage more than 100 miles of washes, seeps, springs and streams. The proposed mine lies less than three miles west of the Las Cienegas National Conservation Area managed by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management.
Las Cienagas includes a rare, shallow Sonoran Desert aquifer that is projected to be directly impacted by the construction of the mine pit that will reverse groundwater flow directions and draw water away from the aquifer and into the pit.
The Coronado National Forest published the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and Draft Record of Decision (ROD) for this project on Dec. 16, 2013. A 45-day review and objection began on Jan. 1, after which the Forest Service has up to 75 days to address any objections raised before it can make any final decisions about the project.
Coronado National Forest Supervisor Jim Upchurch has publicly stated the FEIS fails to resolve nor fully addresses numerous significant issues raised by local, state and other federal agencies.
“For example, the US EPA analyzed Rosemont’s proposed water pollution mitigation plan and concluded that it is ‘grossly inadequate,’ that it ‘does not comply’ with Clean Water Act Guidelines, and that the Rosemont Mine project ‘should not be permitted as proposed,’” the letter states.
The letter notes that none of the 12 tribal nations and communities have signed a Memorandum of Understanding related to the destruction of scores of irreplaceable cultural sites and burial grounds that will be destroyed by the project.
“We remain committed to ensuring that our environment, economies, and cultural heritage are not jeopardized by this short-sighted mining proposal, a project that would primarily enrich a handful of foreign investors at the expense of those of us whose lives and livelihoods would be jeopardized by the mine’s depletion of precious groundwater supplies and its pervasive and round-the clock water, air, noise, and light pollution,” the letter states.
The groups signing the letter include: Save the Scenic Santa Ritas, Earthworks, Sierra Club Grand Canyon Chapter, Friends of Madera Canyon, Tucson Audubon Society, Mountain Empire Action Alliance, Coalition for the Sonoran Desert Protection, Sky Island Alliance, Arizona Mining Reform Coalition, Defenders of Wildlife, Center for Biological Diversity and the Patagonia Area Resource Alliance.
Show message history
👍️0
AZCUminer AZCUminer 10 years ago
Nice upward trend.
👍️0
AZCUminer AZCUminer 10 years ago
Impressive. just passed the 4 million mark. great volume.
👍️0
Tom489 Tom489 10 years ago
Give it until mid week when they have their meeting. By next week it will be sitting nice
👍️0
AZCUminer AZCUminer 10 years ago
But price went from 3.12 to 2.83 with that volume.
👍️0
AZCUminer AZCUminer 10 years ago
Just saw it. We'll see what happens. volume crazy. million already.
👍️0
AZCUminer AZCUminer 10 years ago
Just saw it. We'll see what happens. volume crazy. million already.
👍️0
Tom489 Tom489 10 years ago
The buyout man. Gonna go crazy. Shares already valued at just under 3$ and there should be a bidding war for the company. 3-4$ pretty safe. Check out news
👍️0
AZCUminer AZCUminer 10 years ago
what news?
👍️0
Tom489 Tom489 10 years ago
Anyone on this board? Should see a noticeable jump in pps with that news. What ya think
👍️0
Koog Koog 10 years ago
The EPA has and will deny the water permit. They have the final veto. No water, no mine. Thank goodness. The public groundswell in Santa Cruz and Pima Counties has been absolutely amazing. And will continue until he idea is dead.
👍️0
DeanJM DeanJM 10 years ago
Only a year away from beginning mining and acquiring the materials and assets. No question long term investment for a decent return.
👍️0
Koog Koog 10 years ago
Looks like it was just slander, and things are a go.

Oh, I don't think so. But I am very happy my water source is safe.
👍️0
DeanJM DeanJM 10 years ago
Looks like it was just slander, and things are a go. Good things to come here most likely.
👍️0
Koog Koog 10 years ago
Augusta must be dizzy after all that spin.

Bottom line is the EPA has final veto on granting the water permit. They will not grant it. And Augusta has run out of time and money.

I live here and have witnessed the sleazy tactics employed by this outfit. I can only wish the worst for them.
👍️0
AZCUminer AZCUminer 10 years ago
Interesting read.


AZC clarification- still some fight in them!


Augusta Comments on Save the Scenic Santa Rita's Inaccurate Press Release
TORONTO, Nov. 20, 2013 /CNW/ - Augusta Resource Corporation (TSX: AZC) (NYSE MKT: AZC) ("Augusta" or "Company") comments on the Save the Scenic Santa Rita's (SSSR), a local project opponent, inaccurate press release, which makes inappropriate comments and distorted interpretations in relation to a recent Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) letter issued to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) on November 7, 2013.

"The SSSR press release today was not only inaccurate but another attempt to harm our company," said Gil Clausen, Augusta's president and CEO. "This group has historically mischaracterized the level of impact that letters between agencies have and obviously do not understand the permitting or the evaluation process. SSSR totally misrepresents the contents of the letter and the EPA's comments actually said that they were looking forward to working with the Army Corps on mitigation and risk based assessments. For example, nowhere in the EPA's letter did they discuss discharges as 'toxic mine wastes'. The SSSR is fabricating information and attributing that information to EPA in an effort to scare our shareholders and disrupt markets."

The Company states the EPA has been working diligently with the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) and other Federal Agencies to finalize the work required to complete the permitting process. The EPA letter refers to old plans and issues which were the basis of discussion and not decision. The ACOE will make their decisions based on facts, rules and regulations as they continue to maintain good dialog with the EPA.

The final EIS has integrated five years of science based technical studies and analysis and is due out next week, and the printed version of the draft Record of Decision (ROD) from the USFS is expected to be issued mid-December after the documents are printed. When these two printed documents are released, the EPA will be able to work with other agencies and with Rosemont to finalize mitigation planning and to assure compliance with all regulations and permit conditions regarding the 404 Permit issued under the Clean Water Act.

Additionally the references to scientific flaws are from a letter written almost a year ago and acknowledged that the assessment methods were what was prescribed by the ACOE and references a mitigation plan that is out of date and not currently in use. The EPA does not determine appropriate mitigations, this is the ACOE's responsibility.

Rosemont has developed a comprehensive environmental, social and cultural mitigation program with detailed monitoring and reporting protocols to address the concerns and requirements of numerous agency and permit requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act and the Clean Water Act 404 processes.

This mitigation program addresses, and goes well beyond, the EPA's comments on the approximately 65 acres of direct and indirect impacts to dry washes and waters of the US that are under review by the Army Corp of Engineers for the 404 jurisdictional mitigation.

Rosemont will continue working with all of the regulatory agencies as the thorough permit review process comes to conclusion in early 2014.

Mr. Clausen added, "Rosemont has been working closely with the Federal Agencies for the past five years to ensure the appropriate mitigations are developed to address impacts. Throughout that time, the SSSR has consistently and purposely misrepresented the company's intentions, the facts and the NEPA process. They have deliberately worked to undermine the obligations and work of the Agencies involved."


Read more at http://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/azc/augusta-resource-corp?postid=21925952#k9XuBT6ZDWvMtKAX.99
👍️0
Koog Koog 10 years ago
This spells the end of the Rosemont mine, IMO. Good riddance. It would have affected my water.

In a Nov. 7 letter to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the EPA recommended that the proposed Rosemont copper mine should not receive a permit that would allow the company to dump potentially toxic mine wastes into area waterways.

After completing a comprehensive and detailed analysis, EPA concluded that Rosemont’s proposals to mitigate the mine's severe and permanent damage to area water supplies are "scientifically flawed" and "grossly inadequate," and advised the Corps of Engineers that the project "should not be permitted as proposed."

The EPA’s recommendation to deny Rosemont’s permit application is a potentially devastating blow to the mining project because EPA has veto authority over the permit, which would be issued by the Corps of Engineers only if the proposed mine meets Clean Water Act standards. The permit is required before construction could begin on the mile-wide, half-mile deep open pit mine.

http://www.tucsonweekly.com/TheRange/archives/2013/11/21/epa-and-grijalva-point-out-the-obvious-if-augusta-has-better-data-lets-see-it
👍️0
mikey1234 mikey1234 10 years ago
6.25am, pretrade @ 1.26
👍️0
HIM HIM 10 years ago
:),, I am looking for a wonderful recovery tomorrow..WeeeWeeee.

It recovered a little bit on the AH trading today.. but I think we will hit above $1 tomorrow


AZC
👍️0
DAD2 DAD2 10 years ago
It was all lies imo.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/augusta-comments-save-scenic-santa-233100414.html
👍️0
willlbone willlbone 10 years ago
Panic selling. Buy cheap ones here.
👍️0
HIM HIM 10 years ago
AZC news link:

http://www.4-traders.com/news/SSSR-EPA-Recommends-Against-Federal-Water-Permit-for-Rosemont-Mine--17482436/
👍️0
power_forward power_forward 10 years ago
EPA denies their huge mine project, see BOUNCE board--only 750k cash on hand
👍️0
AZCUminer AZCUminer 10 years ago
Thats was crazy. no announcements, and it fell out of the sky.
👍️0
willlbone willlbone 10 years ago
What happen here?
👍️0
Penny Roger$ Penny Roger$ 11 years ago
~ $AZC ~ Daily Par Sar Buy Signal ~ Criteria alert triggered during a recent trading session!

$AZC has just triggered the "Parabolic SAR Buy Signals" scan criteria at Stockcharts.com
~ http://tinyurl.com/SAR-BUY ~







For a more in Depth study and DD profile, similar to the one contained in this link: ~ http://tinyurl.com/DDexample ~
Click the following link and type ticker or brief message asking me about the DD: ~ http://tinyurl.com/GET-THE-DD ~

What does the scan "Parabolic SAR Buy Signals" mean? Below is an image example and study link.
~ http://stockcharts.com/school/doku.php?id=chart_school:technical_indicators:parabolic_sar ~


To find other similar posts of "AZC" utilize the links that follow.
Search MACDgyver's "Parabolic SAR Buy Signals" posts: ~ http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/msgsearchbymember.aspx?searchID=251916&srchyr=2013&SearchStr=ParSarBuyScan ~
Search MACDgyver's posts for symbol "AZC": ~ http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/msgsearchbymember.aspx?searchID=251916&srchyr=2013&SearchStr=AZC ~
Search Ihub for "AZC" posts: ~ http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/msgsearch.aspx?SearchStr=AZC ~


For more in depth training and information visit Chartschool on the Stockcharts page.
~ http://stockcharts.com/school/doku.php?id=chart_school ~


Also don't forget the Ihub Edu Channel.
~ http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/education.aspx ~


c
👍️0
Penny Roger$ Penny Roger$ 11 years ago
~ $AZC ~ Daily Par Sar Buy Signal ~ Criteria alert triggered during a recent trading session!

$AZC has just triggered the "Parabolic SAR Buy Signals" scan criteria at Stockcharts.com
~ http://tinyurl.com/SAR-BUY ~







For a more in Depth study and DD profile, similar to the one contained in this link: ~ http://tinyurl.com/DDexample ~
Click the following link and type ticker or brief message asking me about the DD: ~ http://tinyurl.com/GET-THE-DD ~

What does the scan "Parabolic SAR Buy Signals" mean? Below is an image example and study link.
~ http://stockcharts.com/school/doku.php?id=chart_school:technical_indicators:parabolic_sar ~


To find other similar posts of "AZC" utilize the links that follow.
Search MACDgyver's "Parabolic SAR Buy Signals" posts: ~ http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/msgsearchbymember.aspx?searchID=251916&srchyr=2013&SearchStr=ParSarBuyScan ~
Search MACDgyver's posts for symbol "AZC": ~ http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/msgsearchbymember.aspx?searchID=251916&srchyr=2013&SearchStr=AZC ~
Search Ihub for "AZC" posts: ~ http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/msgsearch.aspx?SearchStr=AZC ~


For more in depth training and information visit Chartschool on the Stockcharts page.
~ http://stockcharts.com/school/doku.php?id=chart_school ~


Also don't forget the Ihub Edu Channel.
~ http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/education.aspx ~


c
👍️0
AZCUminer AZCUminer 11 years ago
http://azstarnet.com/news/science/environment/rosemont-mine-s-water-permit-u%20pheld/article_fef6ef07-67e4-552e-ac2a-ec37e0203264.html?utm_source=Rosemont+Water+permit&utm_campaign=Rosemont+Water+Permit&utm_medium=email.

Nicely done. Congrats.
👍️0
frankie_fillet frankie_fillet 11 years ago
seems things are moving along...
👍️0
frankie_fillet frankie_fillet 11 years ago
VANCOUVER, Jan. 31, 2013 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Augusta Resource
Corporation (TSX/NYSE MKT: AZC) ("Augusta" or "the Company") is pleased to
announce that it has received the Air Quality Permit for its Rosemont C opper
project from the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality ("ADEQ"). The Air
Quality Permit stipulates the operating, monitoring and reporting parameters
that Rosemont must comply with to meet all federal, state and local air quality
requirements.

Rosemont has now received seven major permits required to commence construction.
Only one major permit is remaining, the Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from
the US Army Corp of Engineers, which the Company expects to receive upon the
issuance of the Record of Decision ("ROD") on the Plan of Operations from the
U.S. Forest Service ("USFS").

Gil Clausen, Augusta's President and CEO said, "Having received one of the last
permits remaining represents a major achievement for the Rosemont Copper project
as we near the end of the permitting process and prepare for construction this
year. This success demonstrates our commitment to set high standards for
environmental protection by operating with enhanced emission controls that go
beyond regulatory requirements. Further, we would like to commend the ADEQ for
advancing the permitting process for the Air Quality Permit thoroughly,
professionally and expeditiously."

ABOUT AUGUSTA Augusta is a base metals company focused on advancing the Rosemont
Copper deposit near Tucson, Arizona. Rosemont hosts a large copper/molybdenum
reserve that would account for about 10% of US copper output once in production
(for details refer to www.augustaresource.com). The exceptional experience and
strength of Augusta's management team, combined with the developed
infrastructure and robust economics of the Rosemont project, propels Augusta to
becoming a solid mid-tier copper producer. The Company trades on the Toronto
Stock Exchange and the NYSE MKT under the symbol AZC.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION Certain of the
statements made and information contained herein may contain forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 and forward-looking information within the meaning of
applicable Canadian securities laws. Such forward-looking statements and
forward-looking information include, but are not limited to statements
concerning: expectations surrounding, short term financing, future project
financings or refinancing; the Company's plans at the Rosemont Project including
timing for final permits and construction; estimated production; and capital and
operating and cash flow estimates. Forward-looking statements or information
include statements regarding the expectations and beliefs of management. Often,
but not always, forward-looking statements and forward-looking information can
be identified by the use of words such as "plans", "expects", "is expected",
"budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates", or
"believes" or the negatives thereof or variations of such words and phrases or
statements that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would",
"might" or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved.

Forward-looking statements or information are subject to a variety of risks and
uncertainties which could cause actual events or results to differ from those
reflected in the forward-looking statements or information, including, without
limitation, risks and uncertainties relating to: history of losses; requirements
for additional capital; dilution; loss of its material properties; interest
rates increase; global economy; no history of production; speculative nature of
exploration activities; periodic interruptions to exploration, development and
mining activities; environmental hazards and liability; industrial accidents;
failure of processing and mining equipment; labour disputes; supply problems;
commodity pri ce fluctuations; uncertainty of production and cost estimates; the
interpretation of drill results and the estimation of mineral resources and
reserves; legal and regulatory proceedings and community actions; title matters;
regulatory restrictions; permitting and licensing; volatility of the market
price of Common Shares; insurance; competition; hedging activities; currency
fluctuations; loss of key employees; as well as those factors discussed in the
section entitled "Risk Factors" in the Company's Annual Information Form dated
March 19, 2012. Should one or more of these risks and uncertainties materialize,
or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary
materially from those described in forward-looking statements or information.
Accordingly, readers are advised not to place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements or information. The Company disclaims any intent or obligation to
update forward-looking state ments or information except as required by law, and
you are referred to the full discussion of the Company's business contained in
the Company's reports filed with the securities regulatory authorities in Canada
and the United States

SOURCE Augusta Resource Corporation



www.prnewswire.com


Copyright (C) 2013 PR Newswire. All rights reserved
👍️0
lmcat lmcat 12 years ago
Augusta needs to tell their investors that there is a massive battle underway by the locals to halt the development of the mine.

👍️0
lmcat lmcat 12 years ago
U-TUBE posting about the Santa Ritas.

👍️0
lmcat lmcat 12 years ago
Sargold Resource Corporation, same officers, different company!

http://infoventure.tsx.com/TSXVenture/TSXVentureHttpController?GetPage=CompanySummary&PO_ID=1008398
👍️0
lmcat lmcat 12 years ago
A Sardinian gold mine unearths the deceptive business tactics of Rosemont Copper’s top executives



Augusta Resource Corporation is seeking government approvals to construct a massive open-pit copper mine and dump waste rock and mine tailings on more than 3,000 acres of the Coronado National Forest in the Santa Rita Mountains 35 miles south of Tucson.

The mine would be operated through Augusta’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Rosemont Copper Company.

Augusta, a Vancouver, British Columbia speculative mining company, has never operated a mine and has a very limited business history.

Five of the eight current members of Augusta’s board of directors, however, do a have mining history.

Between 2003 and 2007, these executives were on the board of directors of Sargold Resource Corporation. Sargold owned and operated an open-pit gold mine near the small farming village of Furtei in south-central Sardinia.

InvestigativeMEDIA reviewed Sargold’s publicly available business records and traveled to Sardinia and Vancouver to conduct interviews. The reporting lead to the video documentary “Cyanide Beach”.

InvestigativeMEDIA also prepared the following report on Sargold’s business history that includes a detailed analysis at the end of the historical narrative.

InvestigativeMEDIA offered to meet Augusta officials in Vancouver, but Augusta declined interview requests with the five current Augusta board members to discuss their actions as Sargold directors.

The history and analysis is annotated with links to Sargold’s press releases, regulatory disclosures, court records, Canadian mining claim reports, news articles and scientific studies on the unfolding environmental disaster left behind after the Sardinian gold mine was abandoned.

Sargold’s Sardinian Play

Sargold Resource Corporation (previously 3423786 Canada Inc., 5/1998; Augusta Corp., 7/1998; Canley Developments, 8/2001; Sargold, 7/2003) operated an unprofitable gold mine and held exploration rights for two gold mining claims in Sardinia, Italy between 2003 and 2007.

Sargold’s Board of Directors included five of the eight current directors of Augusta and one former Augusta board member.

Richard Warke

The common Sargold and Augusta directors include: Augusta Chairman Richard Warke, Augusta President and CEO Gil Clausen, and directors Donald B. Clark, Robert P. Wares, Christopher M. H. Jennings. Former Augusta director Michael A. Steeves also served on the Sargold board.

Sargold’s history provides the only example of how the majority of Augusta’s current board managed an active mining company in the immediate past.

Sargold’s corporate records and interviews with key officials in Canada and Italy familiar with Sargold’s operations reveals a troubling history that includes:

* Failure to provide accurate and timely information to shareholders.

* Failure to pay vendors.

* Misspending a Sardinian government loan.

* Evidence of a self-enrichment scheme to benefit its chairman.

* Evidence of insiders receiving excessive discounts on stock purchases.

* Issuing misleading press releases.

* Not disclosing in proxy statements that a Cayman Islands investment fund controlled more than 10 percent of the company between 2005 and 2007.

* Contributing to an ongoing environmental disaster in Sardinia.

Sargold’s Sardinian investment

Sargold’s primary asset was its Italian subsidiary, Sardinia Gold Mining, SPA (SGM).

In March 2003, Sargold, then known as Canley Developments, entered the Italian gold mining business through a joint venture with Australian-based Gold Mines of Sardinia. Gold Mines of Sardinia held a 90 percent interest in Sardinia Gold Mining, SPA.

In June 2003, Sargold signed a purchase agreement to buy 50 percent of GMS to take a 45 percent interest in Sardinia Gold Mining.

In early 2004, Sargold issued two press releases concerning Sardinia Gold Mining’s primary asset, the Furtei Gold Mine. The first release touted “significant increases in gold grade”; and the second announced discovery of a “substantially larger resource than was originally estimated”.


Donald Clark

In June 2004, Sargold announced plans to purchase the remaining 45 percent interest from the Australian company to up its stake in Sardinia Gold Mining to 90 percent. Progemisa, an Italian government mining research organization, owned the remaining 10 percent.

A month later, in July 2004, Sargold issued a press release hailing its drill exploration program that had discovered the “highest gold grades” to date at the Furtei mine.

Sargold closed the purchase in September 2004 and assumed control of Sardinia Gold Mining’s assets, including the Furtei open pit gold mine and exploration rights near the historic Sardinian town of Osilo.

Enter the hedge fund

In October 2004, RAB Special Situations, a Cayman Islands hedge fund, purchased 4 million units of Sargold in a private placement to take a 26 percent stake in the company. RAB Special Situations made additional major purchases through private placements in 2006 and 2007. Sargold did not repor RAB’s 10 percent or more share of the company’s stock in its annual proxy statements between 2005 and 2007.

In November 2004, Sargold issued another optimistic press release describing its “in-ground gold resources, hundreds of square kilometers of prime gold exploration ground, a permitted production facility and over ten years of detailed geological information.”

In early 2005, Sargold appointed Franco Cherchi president of Sardinia Gold Mining.


Robert Wares

This was a very high-profile appointment in Sardinia. Cherchi was a former president of Progemisa, the government-funded mineral resource management agency and Sargold’s minority partner in Sardinia Gold Mining. He was also involved in Sardinian regional politics and was a regional leader in the Left Democratic Party.

“Mr. Cherchi brings extensive experience in geology, administration and local politics to his new position,” Sargold noted in a Jan. 19, 2005 press release.

Furtei’s limited prospects

The Furtei gold mine, is located within a volcanic cinder cone near the small town of Furtei in Southern Sardinia.

The mine complex is also wedged into the middle of an important water and hydroelectric facility that serves southern Sardinia, including its capital, Cagliari.

The Sa Forada water/electric infrastructure includes the Sa Forada Dam and reservoir, underground pipelines, a hydro-electric power plant and a high-tension electricity power grid. The complex was constructed in the 1970s with European Union funding.

Sardinia Gold Mining began operations at the Furtei open pit mine in 1997.


Cyanide Beach

The Sa Forada Reservoir supplies drinking and irrigation water to southern Sardinia. Mining operations stripped away the earth next to the reservoir.

The Australians closed the mine in 2002 after all accessible oxide ore had been removed. About 138,000 ounces of gold were produced.

After assuming full control of Sardinia Gold Mining in 2004, Sargold refurbished the Furtei mine’s milling facilities. Between March and September 2007, Sargold produced 1,300 ounces of gold and silver from waste rock.

Sargold’s business plan was to reopen and expand the Furtei gold mine and use revenue from the sale of gold ore to finance exploration and development of additional potential underground sulfide gold resources at Furtei and explore and develop mining claims near Osilo and on Monte Ollasteddu.

Major Obstacles

Sargold’s business plan faced serious obstacles from the start. These challenges were described in detail in a November 2003 proxy statement prepared by Full Riches Investments, a company that was created to facilitate the sale of Gold Mines of Sardinia.

The issues included:

*All readily accessible oxide ore had been removed from the open pit and Sardinia Gold Mining determined in 2002 that underground mining would be unprofitable.

*The Sa Forada Dam and hydro-electric facilities restricted blasting and impinged on the possible expansion of the Furtei open pit mine and the possible development of an underground mine.

*The remaining gold ore was embedded in a type of rock formation that required expensive and untested methods to extract the gold.

*Opposition in Osilo to mining was significant and opponents had the support of key Italian government agencies.

*Access to Monte Ollasteddu was restricted because it was adjacent to an air base and required military approval.

Ignoring Reality

Sargold glossed over the fundamental challenges in its financial statements and management discussion and analysis reports submitted to Canadian securities regulators.

Instead, Sargold touted rich gold strikes from exploratory drilling and unsubstantiated claims of gold reserves in its press releases, including a 2003 release issued when Sargold, then known as Canley Developments, announced its intent to purchase 45 percent of Sardinia Gold Mines.

The March 26, 2003 press release claimed, among other misleading statements, a “600,000 ounce gold resource” at Furtei. Three months later, the Toronto Venture Stock Exchange forced the company to retract numerous statements concerning gold reserves.

The full extent of the problems facing Sargold did not become apparent to the public and investors until December 2006, when the company restated its financial statementsfor the previous three years. The restatement was issued after the company reported it failed to properly account for taxes related to the purchase of the Furtei mine and another asset.



Sargold’s December 2006 Management Discussion & Analysis provided details to the public and investors about the company’s failure to pay contractors on time, misspending a government loan and the serious obstacles to conducting exploration at Osilo and Mounte Ollasteddu.

By December 2006, Sargold owed more than $1.5 million to its suppliers and contractors, with 85 percent of the payables more than six-months past due. Vendors filed law suits in local Sardinian courts and won judgments.

The December management report also revealed Sargold misspent a Sardinia Regional Financial Institute loan that was intended to develop an underground mine. Sargold spent the money on other operations and the Sardinian government demanded repayment of $787,000.

Withholding key information

At the same time the company’s financial condition was steadily deteriorating, Sargold withheld key information from shareholders.


Gil Clausen

For nearly three years, the company did not publicly identify in its annual proxy statements to shareholders that RAB Special Situations, the Cayman Islands hedge fund, controlled more than 10 percent of the company’s stock. Canadian disclosure laws require companies to disclose the identity of an investor that controls more than 10 percent of the outstanding shares. (See Analysis, Chapter V, below)

Although Sargold insiders, including several board members, participated in the private placements with RAB Special Situations in 2006 and 2007, Sargold did not disclose RAB Special Situation’s major investment in Sargold’s annual proxy statements in 2005, 2006 and 2007.

RAB’s dominate position in the company was not reported in Sargold proxy statements until days before an October 2007 merger with Buffalo Gold Ltd.

Lodestone — an example of self-enrichment

Four years earlier, Sargold entered into an unusual agreement with its chairman, Richard Warke.

In March 2003, Sargold (then known as Canley Developments) purchased four mining claims owned by a company controlled by Warke. Sargold purchased Warke’s company for $688,000 in cash and stock to assume control of the four iron ore mining claims. Warke had acquired the mining claims from his late father’s estate.

Four years later, and after reportedly spending $175,000 on a drilling exploration program, Sargold declared the iron ore project was worthless and wrote off $1.2 million.

In the fall of 2007, Sargold reported in regulatory filings that the Lodestone iron ore claims had been sold to an unidentified buyer for $1.

Canadian mining claim records, however, reveal that Sargold sold the claims back to the Warke-controlled company in October 2007.

And, rather than the claims being worthless, Warke’s company immediately spent $10,000 to keep the claims in good standing with Canadian mining regulators.

The $10,000 investment was made at the same time Sargold approved the sale of the mining claims for $1.

Warke’s company continues to control the claims and has spent $50,000 over the last five years to maintain the claims in good standing with Canadian mining regulators. (See Analysis, Chapter III, below.)

Sargold’s failure to disclose Warke’s personal bankruptcy

In the mid 1990s, Warke was facing personal financial ruin. He was repeatedly sued by various financial institutions and in September 1998 he filed a bankruptcy proposal. The bankruptcy case dragged on for more than four years, with Warke defaulting on the settlement terms in October 2002. Warke settled the case in November 2002.


Christopher Jennings

Sargold does not reveal Warke’s personal bankruptcy proceeding in its proxy statements and annual reports as required by Canadian disclosure regulations until the May 2006 proxy.

Warke’s bankruptcy filing came 9 years after he signed a settlement agreement with the British Columbia Securities Commission on an insider trading violation. Warke agreed to settle allegations he filed knowingly false insider trading statements and paid a $500 fine.



Blue sky

At the same time Sargold was failing to disclose required information to regulators, Sargold continued to issue optimistic press releases over its Sardinian gold mining prospects, despite mounting financial problems that forced Sargold executives to make personal loans to the company in late 2006 and early 2007.

In a March 28, 2007 press release, Sargold reported “significant breakthroughs” in developing a new process to extract gold from rock formations that had limited Furtei gold production in the past.

On May 14, 2007, Sargold announced a huge increase in planned gold production. The press release claimed Sargold would produce between 10,000 and 15,000 ounces of gold within the next 12 months before ramping up to 60,000 to 70,000 ounces the second year and leveling off to 50,000 ounces a year for five years.



Read more:
http://www.investigativemedia.com/sargolds-sardinian-gold-mine-provides-window-into-how-augusta-resources-top-executives-conduct-business/
👍️0
lmcat lmcat 12 years ago
Just returned from seeing the movie "Cyanide Beach" and Augusta should NEVER be allowed to dig a hole for an outhouse!

Green Valley News editor Dan Shearer devotes his Sunday column to InvestigativeMEDIA’s documentary “Cyanide Beach” and states: “This documentary…does raise questions that Rosemont must address if it intends to move forward with integrity.”

“Cyanide Beach” will have two screenings on Monday, Sept. 17. The 24-minute documentary will be shown at 10 a.m. at the Tubac Community Center and at 6:30 p.m. at the Quail Creek Crystal Ballroom. The film will also be shown at 7 p.m., Sept. 29 in Patagonia at the Tin Shed. More screenings are being scheduled. Please see “events” for more information.

“Cyanide Beach” played to a packed house Sept. 5 and 6 at the Desert Sky Cinema in Sahuarita. More than 800 people have seen the documentary at two screenings in Tucson and two in Sahuarita.

(There were about 200 people at the screening tonight.)

Report: A Sardinian gold mine unearths the deceptive business tactics of Rosemont Copper’s top executives. (Click Here)
Timeline: The top officers of Rosemont Copper’s parent company, Augusta Resource Corporation, have a history of bankruptcies, cease trade orders and stock exchange delistings (Click Here)
“Cyanide Beach”: The 23-minute video documentary “Cyanide Beach” tells an important and timely story that anyone interested in the Rosemont copper mine project needs to know. (Click Here)


The multimedia project focuses on Augusta Resource Corporation, a Vancouver, British Columbia-based speculative mining company that wants to build a massive open pit copper mine in the environmentally-sensitive Santa Rita Mountains on the Coronado National Forest 35 miles south of Tucson, AZ.

InvestigativeMEDIA reviewed thousands of pages of financial documents and conducted interviews in the United States, Canada and Italy to document the business history of Augusta’s key executives.

The probe uncovered a tangled history of cease trade orders, an insider trading settlement agreement, stock exchange delistings, personal and corporate bankruptcies, false disclosure statements to regulators and an abandoned Sardinian gold mine that is creating serious, ongoing environmental problems.


Sardinia needs $20,000,000 to clean up the cyanide lake left behind along with the rusted equipment, a total mess.

Las Cienegas National Conservation Area

Augusta owns the Rosemont Copper Company. Rosemont is seeking government permits to build what could become one of the largest copper mines in the United States, producing 240 million pounds of copper annually for approximately 21 years.

The mile-wide, half-mile deep mine would dump waste rock and mine tailings on more than 3,000 acres of the Coronado National Forest and destroy much of a watershed that provides runoff to a rare, shallow Sonoran Desert aquifer beneath the federally-protected Las Cienegas National Conservation Area.

http://www.investigativemedia.com/special-reports-rosemonts-power-play/?doing_wp_cron=1347938331.5964341163635253906250
👍️0
lmcat lmcat 12 years ago
Polluted Italy site a window to Rosemont

A new video documentary portrays a sister company of Rosemont Copper's Canadian parent as unwilling to clean up a polluted Italian gold mine site and willing to walk away from it.

"Cyanide Beach" - a film financed by Farmers Investment Co., a leading opponent of the proposed Rosemont Mine - will be shown in Tucson Thursday.

The film was made by longtime investigative reporter John Dougherty, who has been paid by FICO to investigate Rosemont Copper's parent, Augusta Resource Corp.

FICO, which grows pecan trees in Sahuarita, opposes the mine partly because of competition for water. The mine would be built in the Santa Rita Mountains southeast of Tucson. Dougherty said FICO executives Dick and Nan Walden didn't review or have input into his documentary.

Dougherty's research included trips to Sardinia, Italy, and Vancouver, British Columbia. He estimated the film's cost at $25,000.

The movie is about Sargold Resource Corp., which for several years held a 90 percent interest in a gold mine on the island of Sardinia. Sargold, based in Vancouver, had five of the same directors who now sit on the governing board of Augusta Resource Corp., Dougherty said, including Augusta President-CEO Gil Clausen and Augusta board Chairman Richard Warke. Sargold used the same street address as Augusta, which owns the Rosemont Mine site's private land.

An Augusta Resource Corp. spokeswoman denounced the film as "simply another attack by those opposed to the development of a 21st-century copper project."

"There's very little for us to say that we have not said about the continuous waves of proven false personal attacks upon Rosemont and our team by opponents," said Letitia Cornacchia, Augusta's vice president for investor relations and corporate communications.

Rosemont proposes to mine copper and not gold, and Italy has different environmental rules than the U.S. But Dougherty said Sargold's behavior is what's relevant to the Rosemont controversy. The film's trailer spells out his point: "Two communities, separated by thousands of miles, and one common problem: Canadian mining speculators."

"Sargold passed the buck along, and the end result is a bankrupt operation with an environmental mess that will be foisted upon taxpayers," Dougherty said.

Dougherty said the video shows Sargold made a bunch of business-related promises it didn't keep after buying the mine in 2003. Sargold inherited the pollution. It involved cyanide used to leach the gold from ore leaking into the ground through a tailings dam, Dougherty said.

Sargold told the Sardinian government it would not clean the pollution unless the government let it mine other Sardinia sites, Dougherty said. The government refused, and the pollution wasn't cleaned, even though Sargold had a legal obligation to do it, he said.

Sargold merged with the company Buffalo Gold in 2007, and the merged company folded in late 2008, he said. Dougherty repeatedly offered to interview Augusta officials, but they refused, he said.

Augusta spokeswoman Cornacchia called the film and Dougherty's statements "biased, misleading and inaccurate." Cornacchia, who has not seen the film, declined to elaborate, adding, "The film is based on a flawed premise - produced by one paid by a leading opponent. It is not journalism. Remember that he is the same individual who provided flawed research for a complaint that was filed with the state and was proven wrong and rejected. We will not engage a back and forth."

Cornacchia was referring to the Arizona Corporation Commission's rejection last May of a complaint, filed by mine opponents and based on Dougherty's research, that Augusta broke state law by failing to disclose a bankruptcy filed in Canada by a company of which Warke and another, former Rosemont Copper board member were officers.

In response, Dougherty noted that the ACC didn't find his research factually incorrect; it found the bankruptcy wasn't required to be disclosed in Arizona because it happened outside the U.S.

IF YOU GO

"Cyanide Beach" will be shown at 7 p.m. Thursday at Crossroads Festival Cinema, 4811 E. Grant Road. Admission is free but advance, online RSVPs are requested at http://www.investigativemedia.com/rsvp-for-august-23rd-premiere-of-cyanide-beach/

Contact reporter Tony Davis at tdavis@azstarnet.com or 806-7746.
👍️0
lmcat lmcat 12 years ago
InvestigativeMEDIA releases latest report: “Rosemont’s Power Play”
Posted on August 23, 2012

The multimedia project includes:

Report: A Sardinian gold mine unearths the deceptive business tactics of Rosemont Copper’s top executives.
Timeline: The top officers of Rosemont Copper’s parent company, Augusta Resource Corporation, have a history of bankruptcies, cease trade orders and stock exchange delistings
“Cyanide Beach”: The 23-minute video documentary “Cyanide Beach” tells an important and timely story that anyone interested in the Rosemont copper mine project needs to know.

The multimedia project focuses on Augusta Resource Corporation, a Vancouver, British Columbia-based speculative mining company that wants to build a massive open pit copper mine in the environmentally-sensitive Santa Rita Mountains on the Coronado National Forest 35 miles south of Tucson, AZ.

InvestigativeMEDIA reviewed thousands of pages of financial documents and conducted interviews in the United States, Canada and Italy to document the business history of Augusta’s key executives.

The probe uncovered a tangled history of cease trade orders, an insider trading settlement agreement, stock exchange delistings, personal and corporate bankruptcies, false disclosure statements to regulators and an abandoned Sardinian gold mine that is creating serious, ongoing environmental problems.

Las Cienegas National Conservation Area


President Clinton signed a bill creating the Las Cienegas National Conservation Area (NCA) and Acquisition Planning District in southeastern Arizona on December 6, 2000. The designation was the result of Congress' passage of H.R. 2941 (Congressman Jim Kolbe). The new 42,000-acre NCA consists entirely of public lands managed by the BLM's Tucson Field Office. The NCA is bordered on the north and east by lands within the Acquisition Planning District.

Augusta owns the Rosemont Copper Company. Rosemont is seeking government permits to build what could become one of the largest copper mines in the United States, producing 240 million pounds of copper annually for approximately 21 years.

The mile-wide, half-mile deep mine would dump waste rock and mine tailings on more than 3,000 acres of the Coronado National Forest and destroy much of a watershed that provides runoff to a rare, shallow Sonoran Desert aquifer beneath the federally-protected Las Cienegas National Conservation Area.

Cienega Creek, with its perennial flow and lush riparian corridor, forms the lifeblood of the NCA. The area is home to a great diversity of plant and animal life, including several threatened or endangered species. Protection of this regionally significant open space safeguards a network extending south of Interstate 10 to protected lands in northern Sonora, Mexico.



The BLM Tucson Field Office manages the NCA, which includes the Empire-Cienega Resource Conservation Area. Lands within the Acquisition Planning District are owned and managed by Pima County, National Audubon Society, the State of Arizona, and numerous private landowners.

The Las Cienegas NCA includes a variety of unique and rare vegetative communities including five of the rarest habitat types in the American Southwest: cienegas (marshlands), cottonwood-willow riparian forests, sacaton grasslands, mesquite bosques, and semi-desert grasslands.

Fish and Wildlife: These vegetative communities on the NCA support a diverse assemblage of plants and animals; species include 60 mammals, 230 birds, 43 reptiles and amphibians, and three native fish. Included in this list are 33 species which are federally listed as threatened or endangered, identified as species of special concern by the State of Arizona, or designated as sensitive species by the BLM. Among the special status species are the endangered Gila top minnow, lesser long-nosed bat, and southwestern willow flycatcher; the Chiricahua leopard frog, proposed for endangered species listing; and the Gila chub, a candidate for federal listing. Large game animals include mule and white-tailed deer, pronghorn antelope, javelina, and mountain lion.




Historic Empire Ranch
Las Cienegas National Conservation Area



Posted in Current Investigations, Featured, Rosemont
http://www.investigativemedia.com/tag/arizona/
👍️0
Koog Koog 12 years ago
Yes, Save Scenic Santa Ritas is doing a great job but it goes far beyond that organization. There is a huge groundswell of opposition from the ranks of "Joe Homeowner" that spans from eastern Pima County through Santa Cruz County to the border.

As word has gotten out about the negative impact to the aquifer, folks realize that their water resources will be impacted even though they live miles away from the proposed project. Water is a very precious resource in the area. It is the one way to really get people riled up.

Plus, Rosemont isn't the only mining effort on the radar screen. There are efforts afoot in Harshaw near Patagonia as well.

They will be stopped.
👍️0
lmcat lmcat 12 years ago
You are correct - The Save Scenic Santa Ritas Organization is huge with lots of retired professional people supporting it including several lawyers who are working pro bono. They will tie Augusta up for years with lawsuits!



Plus
Rosemont Copper CEO Admits Company Didn’t File Disclosures in Arizona

Local Coalition Files Appeal to Protect Tucson and Southern Arizona Water Supplies
A diverse coalition of southern Arizonans charged today that a key water quality permit will allow Rosemont Copper Company to pollute area groundwater supplies with mercury, arsenic, lead and other dangerous contaminants —without oversight or consequence—for at least two years after mining operations begin.

The Failure of the Rosemont Mine DEIS to Adequately Analyze the
Socioeconomic Impacts of the Proposed Mine

http://www.scenicsantaritas.org/PowerCritiqueFinal.pdf
👍️0
frankie_fillet frankie_fillet 12 years ago
News for 'AZC' - (*DJ Augusta Resource Corp Raised To Spec Buy From Hold At TD >AZC.T)
👍️0
Koog Koog 12 years ago
KEY FACTS ABOUT THE PROPOSED ROSEMONT MINE

Rosemont Copper and its parent company, Augusta Resource, are spending significant amounts of money attempting to convince southern Arizonans that the proposed, massive Rosemont mine in the Santa Rita mountains will not adversely impact our quality of life. However, when one looks beyond Rosemont’s PR spin and examines key facts about this project, it becomes clear that the proposed Rosemont Mine is bad for our environment, our economy and our communities.

FACT: Augusta, a Canadian company, is using a law signed in 1872 by President Ulysses S. Grant to take 4,000 acres of our public lands essentially for free and turn it into an open pit copper mine and mine waste dump.

Mine Plan of Operations, Rosemont Copper, July 2007 (http://www.fs.fed.us/r3/coronado/rosemont/mpo.shtml)

FACT: In documents filed with Canadian financial regulatory agency, Augusta Resource discloses that it has no “history of production” and “has never recorded any revenues from mining operations.” As a result, there is no track record on which to evaluate Rosemont Copper’s willingness or ability to follow through on its promises on how it will operate this mine.

2011 Annnual Information Form, Augusta Resource Corporation, SEDAR, March 31, 2011

http://www.sedar.com/sedar/sedar_en.htm

FACT: Rosemont Copper will excavate a massive open pit copper mine that will be over a mile across rim-to-rim and more than a half a mile deep. The amount of rock that will be removed will weigh the same as 18,000 aircraft carriers.

Mine Plan of Operations, Rosemont Copper, July 2007 (http://www.fs.fed.us/r3/coronado/rosemont/mpo.shtml)

U.S. Department of Navy

http://www.navy.com/about/equipment/vessels/carriers.html

FACT: The proposed Rosemont mine will have no direct access to a rail line. The only access to the mine site is via scenic State Route 83 and I-10. All of the ore extracted from the mine and all of the equipment, chemicals, and explosives will be trucked on that rural highway. The access routes for the proposed Rosemont Mine runs straight through anticipated growth areas for the City of Tucson.

Mine Plan of Operations, Rosemont Copper, July 2007 (http://www.fs.fed.us/r3/coronado/rosemont/mpo.shtml)

Growth Focus Areas, City of Tucson

www.ci.tucson.az.us/pdf/csp-growth2.pdf

FACT: Unlike every other industrial, agricultural, and residential water user in the state, mines are essentially unregulated water users. Groundwater extraction permits for mines are “must issue”. As a result, they face no legal restrictions or limits on the amount of water they can extract from the aquifer. Notwithstanding what they say today, Rosemont can pump as much water as they want at any point in the future.

Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS 45-514)

http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/45/00514.htm&Title=45&DocType=ARS

Mine Plan of Operations, Rosemont Copper, July 2007 (http://www.fs.fed.us/r3/coronado/rosemont/mpo.shtml)

FACT: The open pit for the Rosemont Copper mine will be excavated right into the middle of a major aquifer for the region. While the mine is operating, continuous pumping will be necessary to prevent the mine from flooding. According to Rosemont’s planning documents, when the mine closes, pumping will cease and storm run-off will be directed into the pit and a “pit lake” will be created. Experience with other mines clearly indicates the potential that water in this pit lake will become a highly toxic soup and as a result, a risk of it seeping into the groundwater—contaminating this aquifer, a key southern Arizona water source.

Mine Plan of Operations, Rosemont Copper, July 2007 (http://www.fs.fed.us/r3/coronado/rosemont/mpo.shtml)

Hydrogeology of the Santa Rita Rosemont Project Site Numerical Groundwater Modeling of the Conceptual Flow Model and Effects of the Construction of the Proposed Open Pit April 2008, Tom Myers PhD, Prepared for: Pima County Regional Flood Control District

(www.pima.gov/cmo/sdcp/reports/d51/rosemont.mine.goundwater.pdf)

Groundwater Flow Modeling Conducted for Simulation of Proposed Rosemont Pit Dewatering and Post-Closure Rosemont Project Pima County, Arizona, Montogomery and Associate prepared for Rosemont Copper, October 2009

http://rosemonteis.us/techreports/groundwater_flow_model_simulation.pdf

FACT: The Rosemont mine will permanently destroy a significant area of the Santa Rita Mountain Range. Rosemont’s Reclamation Plan makes it clear that post closure, it will not backfill the open pit thus leaving a mile-wide hole in the ground forever, that will result in the creation of a pit lake.

Mine Plan of Operations, Rosemont Copper, July 2007 (http://www.fs.fed.us/r3/coronado/rosemont/mpo.shtml)
👍️0
Koog Koog 12 years ago
Rosemont Mine prospects continue to look shakier

by David Safier

The push by Augusta Resource Corporation to build the Rosemont Mine has been running into all kinds of problems lately. Environmental decisions haven't been favorable. The corporation is running out of money and having trouble digging up new funds. And now this.

Augusta Resource Corporation CEO Gil Clausen submitted his resignation from the board of directors of Jaguar Mining Corporation last Friday following a shareholder revolt aimed at forcing Clausen and two other directors off the board.

Mr. Clausen is the highest profile executive of Augusta Resource, whose subsidiary, Rosemont Copper Company, is seeking to a build a massive open pit copper mine in the Santa Rita Mountains on the Coronado National Forest south of Tucson.

Mr. Clausen’s offer to resign as Jaguar’s director could complicate Augusta’s efforts to avert a cash flow crisis and secure $404 million in long-term loans needed to construct the Rosemont mine.

Things continue to look worse for Augusta and better for Southern Arizona.

http://www.blogforarizona.com/blog/2012/07/rosemont-mine-prospects-continue-to-look-shakier.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+BlogForArizona+%28Blog+For+Arizona%29
👍️0
Koog Koog 12 years ago
Paradise (Lost)

Then the ore company came with the world's largest shovel
And they tortured the timber and stripped all the land
Well, they dug for their ore till the land was forsaken
Then they wrote it all down as the progress of man.

And daddy won't you take me back to Rosemont Junction
Down Santa Cruz River where Helvetia lay
Well, I'm sorry my son, but you're too late in asking
Mister Rod Pace's ore trucks have hauled it away

(credit John Prine's "Paradise": what happened in western Kentucky is happening in southern Arizona). Ruck Fosemont!!
👍️0
Koog Koog 12 years ago
Rosemont will fail. Public opposition is overwhelming, especially from those whose lives and homes will be directly impacted. Augusta can stay in Canada and stay out of the Santa Ritas. We will not allow them to turn such pristine land into another Morenci.
👍️0

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock