00011012152022FYfalsehttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#AccountingStandardsUpdate201613Memberhttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#OtherAssetshttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#OtherAssetshttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#OtherLiabilitieshttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#OtherLiabilities120.400011012152022-01-012022-12-3100011012152022-06-30iso4217:USD00011012152023-02-22xbrli:shares00011012152021-01-012021-12-3100011012152020-01-012020-12-31iso4217:USDxbrli:shares0001101215us-gaap:AccumulatedTranslationAdjustmentMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215us-gaap:AccumulatedTranslationAdjustmentMember2020-01-012020-12-3100011012152022-12-3100011012152021-12-310001101215us-gaap:VariableInterestEntityPrimaryBeneficiaryMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:VariableInterestEntityPrimaryBeneficiaryMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:CommonStockMember2019-12-310001101215us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2019-12-310001101215us-gaap:TreasuryStockCommonMember2019-12-310001101215us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2019-12-310001101215us-gaap:AociIncludingPortionAttributableToNoncontrollingInterestMember2019-12-3100011012152019-12-310001101215us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2020-01-012020-12-3100011012152019-01-012019-12-310001101215srt:CumulativeEffectPeriodOfAdoptionAdjustmentMemberus-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2019-12-310001101215srt:CumulativeEffectPeriodOfAdoptionAdjustmentMember2019-12-310001101215us-gaap:AociIncludingPortionAttributableToNoncontrollingInterestMember2020-01-012020-12-310001101215us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2020-01-012020-12-310001101215us-gaap:CommonStockMember2020-01-012020-12-310001101215us-gaap:CommonStockMember2020-12-310001101215us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2020-12-310001101215us-gaap:TreasuryStockCommonMember2020-12-310001101215us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2020-12-310001101215us-gaap:AociIncludingPortionAttributableToNoncontrollingInterestMember2020-12-3100011012152020-12-310001101215us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215us-gaap:AociIncludingPortionAttributableToNoncontrollingInterestMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215us-gaap:CommonStockMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215us-gaap:TreasuryStockCommonMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215us-gaap:CommonStockMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:TreasuryStockCommonMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:AociIncludingPortionAttributableToNoncontrollingInterestMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215us-gaap:AociIncludingPortionAttributableToNoncontrollingInterestMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215us-gaap:CommonStockMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215us-gaap:CommonStockMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:TreasuryStockCommonMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:AociIncludingPortionAttributableToNoncontrollingInterestMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:InterchangeRevenueNetOfRetailerShareArrangementsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215bfh:InterchangeRevenueNetOfRetailerShareArrangementsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215bfh:InterchangeRevenueNetOfRetailerShareArrangementsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001101215bfh:NonInterestExpensesMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215bfh:NonInterestExpensesMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215bfh:NonInterestExpensesMember2020-01-012020-12-310001101215bfh:FiveLargestCreditCardProgramsMemberus-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberus-gaap:SalesRevenueNetMember2022-01-012022-12-31xbrli:pure0001101215us-gaap:LiabilitiesTotalMemberbfh:FiveLargestCreditCardProgramsMemberus-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215us-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberus-gaap:SalesRevenueNetMemberbfh:BJsWholesaleClubBJsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215us-gaap:LiabilitiesTotalMemberus-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberbfh:BJsWholesaleClubBJsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215bfh:CreditCardAndLoanReceivablesMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:CreditCardAndLoanReceivablesMember2021-12-310001101215bfh:InstallmentLoanReceivablesMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:InstallmentLoanReceivablesMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:FinancingReceivables30To59DaysPastDueMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:FinancingReceivables60To89DaysPastDueMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:FinancingReceivablesEqualToGreaterThan90DaysPastDueMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:FinancialAssetPastDueMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:FinancialAssetNotPastDueMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:FinancingReceivables30To59DaysPastDueMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:FinancingReceivables60To89DaysPastDueMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:FinancingReceivablesEqualToGreaterThan90DaysPastDueMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:FinancialAssetPastDueMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:FinancialAssetNotPastDueMember2021-12-310001101215bfh:InstallmentLoanReceivablesMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215srt:MaximumMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215us-gaap:CreditCardReceivablesMemberus-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember2022-01-012022-12-31bfh:item0001101215us-gaap:CreditCardReceivablesMemberus-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215bfh:ConsumerCreditCardFinancingReceivableThatSubsequentlyDefaultedMemberus-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215bfh:ConsumerCreditCardFinancingReceivableThatSubsequentlyDefaultedMemberus-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:ConsumerCreditCardFinancingReceivableThatSubsequentlyDefaultedMemberus-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215bfh:ConsumerCreditCardFinancingReceivableThatSubsequentlyDefaultedMemberus-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:CreditCardReceivablesMemberbfh:NoScoreMemberbfh:CreditScoreFrom661OrHigherMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:CreditCardReceivablesMemberbfh:CreditScoreFrom601To660Memberbfh:NoScoreMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:CreditScoreFrom600OrLessMemberus-gaap:CreditCardReceivablesMemberbfh:NoScoreMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:CreditCardReceivablesMemberbfh:NoScoreMemberbfh:CreditScoreFrom661OrHigherMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:CreditCardReceivablesMemberbfh:CreditScoreFrom601To660Memberbfh:NoScoreMember2021-12-310001101215bfh:CreditScoreFrom600OrLessMemberus-gaap:CreditCardReceivablesMemberbfh:NoScoreMember2021-12-310001101215bfh:FICOScoreFrom660AndAboveMemberbfh:InstallmentLoanReceivablesMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:FICOScoreBelow660Memberbfh:InstallmentLoanReceivablesMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:FICOScoreFrom660AndAboveMemberbfh:InstallmentLoanReceivablesMember2021-12-310001101215bfh:FICOScoreFrom660AndBelowMemberbfh:InstallmentLoanReceivablesMember2021-12-3100011012152021-08-012021-08-31bfh:loanbfh:portfolio_sale0001101215us-gaap:SubsequentEventMemberbfh:BJsWholesaleClubBJsMember2023-02-012023-02-280001101215us-gaap:SubsequentEventMemberbfh:BJsWholesaleClubBJsMember2023-02-280001101215bfh:CreditCardLoansMember2022-04-012022-04-300001101215bfh:CreditCardLoansMember2022-10-012022-10-310001101215bfh:CreditCardLoansMember2022-10-310001101215us-gaap:CustomerRelationshipsMember2022-10-012022-10-310001101215us-gaap:AccountingStandardsUpdate201613Membersrt:CumulativeEffectPeriodOfAdoptionAdjustmentMember2020-01-010001101215srt:MinimumMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215us-gaap:MortgageBackedSecuritiesMember2022-12-310001101215srt:MinimumMemberbfh:FurnitureAndEquipmentMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215bfh:FurnitureAndEquipmentMembersrt:MaximumMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215srt:MinimumMemberus-gaap:LeaseholdImprovementsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215us-gaap:LeaseholdImprovementsMembersrt:MaximumMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215srt:MinimumMemberbfh:InternalUseSoftwareMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215bfh:InternalUseSoftwareMembersrt:MaximumMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215bfh:InternalUseSoftwareMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:InternalUseSoftwareMember2021-12-310001101215bfh:FurnitureAndEquipmentMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:FurnitureAndEquipmentMember2021-12-310001101215bfh:LandAndLeaseholdImprovementsMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:LandAndLeaseholdImprovementsMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:ConstructionInProgressMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:ConstructionInProgressMember2021-12-310001101215bfh:CustomerContractsAndListsMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:CustomerContractsAndListsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215bfh:PremiumOnPurchasedCreditCardLoanPortfoliosMember2022-12-310001101215srt:MinimumMemberbfh:PremiumOnPurchasedCreditCardLoanPortfoliosMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215bfh:PremiumOnPurchasedCreditCardLoanPortfoliosMembersrt:MaximumMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215us-gaap:NoncompeteAgreementsMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:NoncompeteAgreementsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215us-gaap:TradeNamesMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:CustomerContractsAndListsMember2021-12-310001101215bfh:CustomerContractsAndListsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215bfh:PremiumOnPurchasedCreditCardLoanPortfoliosMember2021-12-310001101215srt:MinimumMemberbfh:PremiumOnPurchasedCreditCardLoanPortfoliosMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215bfh:PremiumOnPurchasedCreditCardLoanPortfoliosMembersrt:MaximumMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215us-gaap:NoncompeteAgreementsMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:NoncompeteAgreementsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215us-gaap:TradeNamesMember2021-12-3100011012152020-01-010001101215bfh:LVIMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:DirectDepositMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:DirectDepositMember2021-12-310001101215bfh:WholesaleDepositsMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:WholesaleDepositsMember2021-12-310001101215bfh:CardholderCreditBalancesMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:CardholderCreditBalancesMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:RevolvingCreditFacilityMemberus-gaap:LineOfCreditMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:RevolvingCreditFacilityMemberus-gaap:LineOfCreditMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:LineOfCreditMemberus-gaap:SecuredDebtMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:LineOfCreditMemberus-gaap:SecuredDebtMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:SeniorNotesMemberbfh:SeniorNotesDue2024Member2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:SeniorNotesMemberbfh:SeniorNotesDue2024Member2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:SeniorNotesMemberbfh:SeniorNotesDue2026Member2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:SeniorNotesMemberbfh:SeniorNotesDue2026Member2021-12-310001101215bfh:LineOfCreditAndSeniorNotesMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:LineOfCreditAndSeniorNotesMember2021-12-310001101215bfh:FixedRateAssetBackedTermNoteSecuritiesMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:FixedRateAssetBackedTermNoteSecuritiesMember2021-12-310001101215bfh:ConduitAssetBackedSecuritiesMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:ConduitAssetBackedSecuritiesMember2021-12-310001101215bfh:NonRecourseBorrowingsOfConsolidatedSecuritizationEntitiesMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:NonRecourseBorrowingsOfConsolidatedSecuritizationEntitiesMember2021-12-310001101215srt:WeightedAverageMemberbfh:SOFRMemberus-gaap:LineOfCreditMemberus-gaap:SecuredDebtMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215srt:WeightedAverageMemberbfh:SOFRMemberus-gaap:LineOfCreditMemberus-gaap:SecuredDebtMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215srt:MinimumMemberbfh:ConduitAssetBackedSecuritiesMemberbfh:SOFRMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215bfh:ConduitAssetBackedSecuritiesMemberbfh:SOFRMembersrt:MaximumMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215srt:MinimumMemberbfh:ConduitAssetBackedSecuritiesMemberbfh:SOFRMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215bfh:ConduitAssetBackedSecuritiesMemberbfh:SOFRMembersrt:MaximumMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215us-gaap:SeniorNotesMemberbfh:SeniorNotesDue2024Member2019-12-310001101215us-gaap:SeniorNotesMemberbfh:SeniorNotesDue2026Member2020-09-300001101215us-gaap:SeniorNotesMemberbfh:SeniorNotesDue2026Member2020-09-220001101215bfh:AssetBackedTermNotesMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215bfh:ConduitAssetBackedSecuritiesMemberus-gaap:LineOfCreditMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:ConduitAssetBackedSecuritiesMemberus-gaap:LineOfCreditMember2022-03-310001101215bfh:ConduitAssetBackedSecuritiesMemberus-gaap:LineOfCreditMember2022-04-300001101215bfh:A2009VFNConduitFacilityMemberus-gaap:LineOfCreditMember2022-03-310001101215bfh:A2009VFNConduitFacilityMemberus-gaap:LineOfCreditMember2022-04-300001101215bfh:ConduitAssetBackedSecuritiesMemberus-gaap:LineOfCreditMember2022-06-300001101215us-gaap:CarryingReportedAmountFairValueDisclosureMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:EstimateOfFairValueFairValueDisclosureMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:CarryingReportedAmountFairValueDisclosureMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:EstimateOfFairValueFairValueDisclosureMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member2021-12-310001101215bfh:LoyaltyVenturesIncMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215bfh:LoyaltyVenturesIncMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:LoyaltyVenturesIncMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215bfh:ComenityBankMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:ComenityCapitalBankMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:CombinedBanksMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:DiscontinuedOperationsDisposedOfBySaleMemberbfh:EpsilonMember2021-01-192021-01-19bfh:installment0001101215us-gaap:DiscontinuedOperationsDisposedOfBySaleMember2020-01-012020-12-310001101215us-gaap:DiscontinuedOperationsDisposedOfBySaleMemberbfh:EpsilonMember2021-01-012021-01-310001101215us-gaap:DiscontinuedOperationsDisposedOfBySaleMemberbfh:EpsilonMember2022-01-012022-01-310001101215bfh:A2015EmployeeStockPurchasePlanMemberus-gaap:EmployeeStockMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215bfh:A2005EmployeeStockPurchasePlanMemberus-gaap:EmployeeStockMember2016-06-300001101215bfh:A2015EmployeeStockPurchasePlanMemberus-gaap:EmployeeStockMember2015-07-010001101215bfh:A2015EmployeeStockPurchasePlanMemberus-gaap:EmployeeStockMember2016-06-300001101215bfh:A2015EmployeeStockPurchasePlanMemberus-gaap:EmployeeStockMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215us-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215us-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember2020-01-012020-12-310001101215us-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember2001-07-200001101215us-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:SupplementalEmployeeRetirementPlanDefinedBenefitMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215us-gaap:SupplementalEmployeeRetirementPlanDefinedBenefitMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:SupplementalEmployeeRetirementPlanDefinedBenefitMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:AccumulatedNetUnrealizedInvestmentGainLossMember2019-12-310001101215us-gaap:AccumulatedGainLossNetCashFlowHedgeParentMember2019-12-310001101215bfh:AccumulatedNetGainLossFromNetInvestmentHedgeIncludingPortionAttributableToNoncontrollingInterestMember2019-12-310001101215us-gaap:AccumulatedTranslationAdjustmentMember2019-12-310001101215us-gaap:AccumulatedNetUnrealizedInvestmentGainLossMember2020-01-012020-12-310001101215us-gaap:AccumulatedGainLossNetCashFlowHedgeParentMember2020-01-012020-12-310001101215bfh:AccumulatedNetGainLossFromNetInvestmentHedgeIncludingPortionAttributableToNoncontrollingInterestMember2020-01-012020-12-310001101215bfh:PrecimaMember2020-01-012020-12-310001101215us-gaap:AccumulatedNetUnrealizedInvestmentGainLossMember2020-12-310001101215us-gaap:AccumulatedGainLossNetCashFlowHedgeParentMember2020-12-310001101215bfh:AccumulatedNetGainLossFromNetInvestmentHedgeIncludingPortionAttributableToNoncontrollingInterestMember2020-12-310001101215us-gaap:AccumulatedTranslationAdjustmentMember2020-12-310001101215us-gaap:AccumulatedNetUnrealizedInvestmentGainLossMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215us-gaap:AccumulatedGainLossNetCashFlowHedgeParentMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215bfh:AccumulatedNetGainLossFromNetInvestmentHedgeIncludingPortionAttributableToNoncontrollingInterestMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215bfh:LoyaltyOneMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215us-gaap:AccumulatedNetUnrealizedInvestmentGainLossMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:AccumulatedGainLossNetCashFlowHedgeParentMember2021-12-310001101215bfh:AccumulatedNetGainLossFromNetInvestmentHedgeIncludingPortionAttributableToNoncontrollingInterestMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:AccumulatedTranslationAdjustmentMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:AccumulatedNetUnrealizedInvestmentGainLossMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215us-gaap:AccumulatedGainLossNetCashFlowHedgeParentMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215bfh:AccumulatedNetGainLossFromNetInvestmentHedgeIncludingPortionAttributableToNoncontrollingInterestMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215us-gaap:AccumulatedTranslationAdjustmentMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215us-gaap:AccumulatedNetUnrealizedInvestmentGainLossMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:AccumulatedGainLossNetCashFlowHedgeParentMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:AccumulatedNetGainLossFromNetInvestmentHedgeIncludingPortionAttributableToNoncontrollingInterestMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:AccumulatedTranslationAdjustmentMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:LoyaltyOneMember2021-11-052021-11-050001101215bfh:PrecimaMember2020-01-102020-01-1000011012152022-02-2800011012152022-02-282022-03-300001101215bfh:A2015OmnibusIncentivePlanMember2015-07-010001101215bfh:A2020OmnibusIncentivePlanMember2020-07-0100011012152022-06-220001101215bfh:A2020OmnibusIncentivePlanMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:MarketBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2019-12-310001101215bfh:PerformanceBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2019-12-310001101215bfh:ServiceBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2019-12-310001101215us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2019-12-310001101215bfh:MarketBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001101215bfh:PerformanceBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001101215bfh:ServiceBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001101215us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2020-01-012020-12-310001101215bfh:MarketBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2020-12-310001101215bfh:PerformanceBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2020-12-310001101215bfh:ServiceBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2020-12-310001101215us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2020-12-310001101215bfh:MarketBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215bfh:PerformanceBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215bfh:ServiceBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215bfh:MarketBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2021-12-310001101215bfh:PerformanceBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2021-12-310001101215bfh:ServiceBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2021-12-310001101215us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2021-12-310001101215bfh:MarketBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215bfh:PerformanceBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215bfh:ServiceBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215bfh:MarketBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:PerformanceBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:ServiceBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:MarketBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2021-11-012021-11-300001101215bfh:PerformanceBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2021-11-012021-11-300001101215bfh:ServiceBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2021-11-012021-11-300001101215srt:MinimumMemberbfh:PerformanceBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215bfh:PerformanceBasedRestrictedStockUnitAwardsMembersrt:MaximumMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215us-gaap:SubsequentEventMember2023-01-262023-01-260001101215us-gaap:CommonStockMember2021-07-302021-07-300001101215us-gaap:TreasuryStockMember2021-07-302021-07-300001101215us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2021-07-302021-07-300001101215us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2021-07-302021-07-300001101215us-gaap:DomesticCountryMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:ForeignCountryMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:StateAndLocalJurisdictionMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:CapitalLossCarryforwardMember2022-12-310001101215us-gaap:DiscontinuedOperationsDisposedOfByMeansOtherThanSaleSpinoffMember2021-12-310001101215bfh:LoyaltyOneMemberus-gaap:DiscontinuedOperationsDisposedOfByMeansOtherThanSaleSpinoffMember2021-11-052021-11-050001101215bfh:LoyaltyVenturesMemberus-gaap:DiscontinuedOperationsDisposedOfByMeansOtherThanSaleSpinoffMember2021-11-050001101215bfh:LoyaltyVenturesMemberus-gaap:DiscontinuedOperationsDisposedOfByMeansOtherThanSaleSpinoffMember2022-12-310001101215bfh:LoyaltyOneMemberus-gaap:DiscontinuedOperationsDisposedOfByMeansOtherThanSaleSpinoffMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215bfh:LoyaltyOneMemberus-gaap:DiscontinuedOperationsDisposedOfByMeansOtherThanSaleSpinoffMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215bfh:LoyaltyOneMemberus-gaap:DiscontinuedOperationsDisposedOfByMeansOtherThanSaleSpinoffMember2020-01-012020-12-310001101215bfh:LoyaltyOneMemberus-gaap:DiscontinuedOperationsDisposedOfByMeansOtherThanSaleSpinoffMember2022-12-310001101215srt:ParentCompanyMember2022-12-310001101215srt:ParentCompanyMember2021-12-310001101215srt:ParentCompanyMember2022-01-012022-12-310001101215srt:ParentCompanyMember2021-01-012021-12-310001101215srt:ParentCompanyMember2020-01-012020-12-310001101215srt:ParentCompanyMember2020-12-310001101215srt:ParentCompanyMember2019-12-310001101215bfh:BreadAcquisitionMember2020-01-012020-12-31
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
x ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022
or
o TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-15749
__________________________________________________
BREAD FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
31-1429215 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
3095 Loyalty Circle
|
43219
|
Columbus, Ohio
|
(Zip Code) |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(614) 729-4000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
__________________________________________________
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title of each class |
|
Trading symbol |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share |
|
BFH |
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
(Title of class)
__________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned
issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes
o
No
x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter)
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit such files). Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a
smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See
definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”,
“smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
x
Accelerated filer
o
Non-accelerated filer
o
Smaller reporting company
o
Emerging growth company
o
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the
registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period
for complying with any new or revised financial accounting
standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange
Act.
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on
and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness
of its internal control over financial reporting under Section
404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the
registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit
report.
x
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act,
indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the
registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an
error to previously issued financial statements.
o
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are
restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based
compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers
during the relevant recovery period pursuant to
§240.10D-1(b).
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes
o
No
x
As of June
30, 2022, the aggregate market value of the common stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately
$1.8 billion, based upon the closing sale price $37.06 as
reported on the New York Stock Exchange.
As of February 22, 2023, 50,115,421 shares of common stock of
the registrant were outstanding.
Documents Incorporated By Reference
Certain information called for by Part III is incorporated by
reference to certain sections of the Proxy Statement for the 2023
Annual Meeting of our stockholders, which will be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after
December 31, 2022.
BREAD FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item No. |
|
Form 10-K
Report
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[RESERVED] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This report includes trademarks, such as Bread®,
Bread Cashback™, Bread Pay™ and Bread Savings™,
which are protected under applicable intellectual property laws and
are the property of Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. or its
subsidiaries. This report also contains trademarks, service marks,
copyrights and trade names of other companies, which are the
property of their respective owners. Solely for convenience, our
trademarks and trade names referred to in this report may appear
without the ® or ™ symbols, but such references are not intended to
indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the fullest
extent under applicable law, our rights or the right of the
applicable licensor to these trademarks and trade
names.
Effective March 23, 2022, we changed our corporate name to Bread
Financial Holdings, Inc. from Alliance Data Systems Corporation,
and on April 4, 2022, we changed our ticker to “BFH” from “ADS” on
the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Neither the name change nor the
NYSE ticker change affected our legal entity structure, nor did
either change have an impact on our consolidated financial
statements. On November 5, 2021, our former LoyaltyOne segment
was spun off into an independent public company Loyalty Ventures
Inc. (traded on The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC under the ticker
“LYLT”) and therefore is reflected herein as Discontinued
Operations.
Throughout this report, unless stated or the context implies
otherwise, the terms “Bread Financial”, the “Company”, “we”, “our”
or “us” refer to Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. and its
subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. References to “Parent
Company” refer to Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. on a parent-only
standalone basis. In addition, in this report, we may refer to the
retailers and other companies with whom we do business as our
“partners”, “brand partners”, or “clients”, provided that the use
of the term “partner”, “partnering” or any similar term does not
mean or imply a formal legal partnership, and is not meant in any
way to alter the terms of Bread Financial’s relationship with any
third parties. We offer our credit products primarily through our
insured depository institution subsidiaries, Comenity Bank and
Comenity Capital Bank, which together are referred to herein as the
“Banks”. Bread Financial is also used in this report to include
references to transactions and arrangements occurring prior to the
name change.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-K and the documents incorporated by reference herein
contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking
statements give our expectations or forecasts of future events and
can generally be identified by the use of words such as “believe”,
“expect”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “intend”, “project”, “plan”,
“likely”, “may”, “should” or other words or phrases of similar
import. Similarly, statements that describe our business strategy,
outlook, objectives, plans, intentions or goals also are
forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to, statements we make regarding, and
the guidance we give with respect to, our anticipated operating or
financial results, future financial performance and outlook, future
dividend declarations and future economic conditions.
We believe that our expectations are based on reasonable
assumptions. Forward-looking statements, however, are subject to a
number of risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict
and, in many cases, beyond our control. Accordingly, our actual
results could differ materially from the projections, anticipated
results or other expectations expressed in this report, and no
assurances can be given that our expectations will prove to have
been correct. Factors that could cause the outcomes to differ
materially include, but are not limited to, the
following:
•macroeconomic
conditions, including market conditions, inflation, rising interest
rates, unemployment levels and the increased probability of a
recession or prolonged economic slowdown, and the related impact on
consumer spending behavior, payments, debt levels, savings rates
and other behavior;
•global
political, market, public health and social events or conditions,
including the ongoing war in Ukraine and the continuing effects of
the COVID-19 pandemic;
•future
credit performance of our customers, including the level of future
delinquency and write-off rates;
•loss
of, or reduction in demand for services from, significant brand
partners or customers in the highly competitive markets in which we
compete;
•the
concentration of our business in U.S. consumer credit;
•increases
or volatility in the Allowance for credit losses that may result
from the application of the current expected credit loss (CECL)
model;
•inaccuracies
in the models and estimates on which we rely, including the amount
of our Allowance for credit losses and our credit risk management
models;
•increases
in fraudulent activity;
•failure
to identify, complete or successfully integrate or disaggregate
business acquisitions, divestitures and other strategic
initiatives, including failure to realize the intended benefits of
the spinoff of our former LoyaltyOne segment;
•the
extent to which our results are dependent upon our brand partners,
including our brand partners’ financial performance and reputation,
as well as the effective promotion and support of our products by
brand partners;
•continued
financial responsibility with respect to a divested business,
including required equity ownership, guarantees, indemnities or
other financial obligations;
•increases
in the cost of doing business, including market interest
rates;
•our
level of indebtedness and inability to access financial or capital
markets, including asset-backed securitization funding or deposits
markets;
•restrictions
that limit our Banks’ ability to pay dividends to us;
•pending
and future litigation;
•pending
and future legislation, regulation, supervisory guidance and
regulatory and legal actions including, but not limited to, those
related to financial regulatory reform and consumer financial
services practices, as well as any such actions with respect to
late fees, interchange fees or other charges;
•increases
in regulatory capital requirements or other support for our
Banks;
•impacts
arising from or relating to the transition of our credit card
processing services to third party service providers that we
completed in 2022;
•failures
or breaches in our operational or security systems, including as a
result of cyberattacks, unanticipated impacts from technology
modernization projects or otherwise;
•loss
of consumer information due to compromised physical or cyber
security;
•any
tax liability, disputes or other adverse impacts arising out of the
spinoff of our former LoyaltyOne segment; and
•those
factors discussed in Item 1A of this Form 10-K, elsewhere in this
Form 10-K and in the documents incorporated by reference in this
Form 10-K.
If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties
materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be
incorrect, actual results may vary materially from what we
projected.
Any forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K speak
only as of the date made, and we undertake no obligation, other
than as required by applicable law, to update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
subsequent events, anticipated or unanticipated circumstances or
otherwise.
PART I
Item 1. Business.
We are a tech-forward financial services company that provides
simple, personalized payment, lending and saving solutions. We
create opportunities for our customers and partners through
digitally enabled choices that offer ease, empowerment, financial
flexibility and exceptional customer experiences. Driven by a
digital-first approach, data insights and white-label technology,
we deliver growth for our partners through a comprehensive product
suite, including private label and co-brand credit cards and buy
now, pay later products such as installment loans and our
“split-pay” offerings. We also offer direct-to-consumer solutions
that give customers more access, choice and freedom through our
branded Bread CashbackTM
American Express®
Credit Card and Bread SavingsTM
products.
Our partner base consists of large consumer-based businesses,
including well-known brands such as (alphabetically) AAA, Academy
Sports + Outdoors, Caesars, Michaels, the NFL, Signet, Ulta and
Victoria’s Secret, as well as small- and medium-sized businesses
(SMBs). Our partner base is also well diversified across a broad
range of industries, including specialty apparel, sporting goods,
health and beauty, jewelry, home goods and travel and
entertainment. We believe our comprehensive suite of payment,
lending and saving solutions, along with our related marketing and
data and analytics, offers us a significant competitive advantage
with products relevant across customer segments (Gen Z, Millennial,
Gen X and Baby Boomers). The breadth and quality of our product and
service offerings have enabled us to establish and maintain
long-standing partner relationships.
On November 5, 2021, we completed the spinoff of our former
LoyaltyOne®
segment, consisting of the Canadian AIR MILES®
Reward Program and Netherlands-based BrandLoyalty businesses, into
an independent, publicly traded company, Loyalty Ventures Inc.
(LVI), which is listed on Nasdaq under the symbol “LYLT”. The
spinoff was completed through the pro rata distribution of 81% of
the outstanding shares of LVI common stock to holders of our common
stock at the close of business on the record date of October 27,
2021, with Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. retaining the remaining
19% of the outstanding shares of LVI common stock. Our stockholders
of record received one share of LVI common stock for every two and
one-half shares of Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. common stock held
on the record date.
Unless otherwise noted, all discussion below, including amounts and
percentages for all periods, reflect the results of operations and
financial condition of Bread Financial Holdings, Inc.’s continuing
operations. As such, the LoyaltyOne segment, which was classified
as discontinued operations as of November 5, 2021, has been
excluded from all presentations below, unless otherwise noted.
Prior to the spinoff of the LoyaltyOne segment, we had two
reportable operating segments (Card Services and LoyaltyOne). We
now operate as a single segment that includes all of our continuing
operations.
Business Strategy & Transformation
Beginning in 2018, our Board of Directors undertook a series of
strategic initiatives based on an evaluation of the portfolio of
businesses that constituted our company at that time. Subsequently,
we completed the sale of our former Epsilon business in July 2019,
the sale of our Precima®
business in January 2020, and the spinoff of our LoyaltyOne segment
in November 2021. Through these transactions and other initiatives,
we have simplified our business model as a leading tech-forward
financial services company providing payment, lending and saving
solutions, while also reducing debt and improving leverage and
capital ratios. As we have transformed the business, we have made
strategic investments in assets with the highest growth potential,
focused on expanding our product suite and direct-to-consumer
offerings, diversifying our customer base, developing key strategic
relationships, enhancing our core technology, and digital
capabilities, and increasing our emphasis on environmental, social
and governance (ESG) initiatives. Below is a timeline of key
milestones in our business transformation since 2020:

We continue to make strategic investments in technology, people,
data management tools and digital capabilities to further improve
our competitive position and drive future growth. These investments
further our objective to grow sales through the origination of
credit card and other loans, making it easier for consumers to
finance purchases and make payments wherever they occur— online, in
store and in-app. By offering consumer choice, we provide relevant
products across consumer segments, including Gen Z and Millennials
who we believe are more likely to be drawn to cash flow management
products such as installment lending and split-pay, while Gen X and
Baby Boomers generally gravitate towards rewards and the
convenience of a private label or co-brand card. With our broad
suite of products, including private label and co-brand credit
cards, installment lending and split-pay, together with digital,
analytical and servicing capabilities to support those products, we
drive incremental sales for our partners’ businesses. We also
intend to continue rebalancing our portfolio, prioritizing and
investing in profitable, strong performing partners, targeting core
and new industries, and becoming a more cost-efficient provider of
financial products and services. In addition, we continue to expand
our direct-to-consumer lending and payment products for new and
existing customers, including our proprietary credit cards (Bread
CashbackTM)
for growth and value retention. As reflected below, during 2022 we
continued to diversify both our product offerings and the
industries in which our partners operate, which we believe will
allow us to balance growth and expand the addressable
market:

Our Primary Product Offerings
Our primary product offerings consist of our: (i) private label and
co-brand credit card programs with retailers and other brand
partners; (ii) Bread CashbackTM
products; (iii) Bread PayTM
products; and (iv) Bread SavingsTM
products. These product offerings are not exclusive, and, where
appropriate, we seek to introduce partners and customers to our
other product offerings.
Private Label and Co-Brand Credit Card Lending
Our core business, historically, has been to assist many of the
country’s best-known brands and retailers in driving sales and
loyalty through their private label and co-brand credit card
programs. In these programs, we (through our Banks) are the credit
card issuer and lender to our partner’s customers, and we also
service the loans and provide a variety of other related services,
which are described in more detail below. Our partner base, with
approximately 100 brands and numerous online merchants, consists of
many large consumer-based businesses, including well-known brands
such as (alphabetically) AAA, Academy Sports + Outdoors, Caesars,
Michaels, the NFL, Signet, Ulta and Victoria’s Secret. Our partners
benefit from customer insights and analytics, with each of our
credit card branded programs tailored to our partner’s brand and
their unique customers.
Specifically, private label credit cards are partner-branded credit
cards that are used exclusively for the purchase of goods and
services from that particular partner. Credit under a private label
credit card typically is extended either on standard terms only,
which means accounts are assessed periodic interest charges using
an agreed non-promotional fixed and/or variable interest rate, or
pursuant to a promotional financing offer, involving deferred
interest, reduced interest or no interest during a set promotional
period (typically between six and 60 months). We receive a merchant
discount from our partners to compensate us for all or part of the
foregone interest income associated with promotional financing. The
terms of these promotions vary by partner, but generally the longer
the deferred interest, reduced interest or interest-free period,
the greater the partner’s merchant discount. Some offers permit
customers to pay for a purchase in equal monthly payments with no
interest or at a reduced interest rate, rather than deferring or
delaying interest charges. We typically do not charge interchange
or other fees to our partners when a customer uses a private label
credit card to purchase our partners’ goods and services through
our payment system. Our private label credit card loan balances are
typically smaller (with an average customer balance of
approximately $400); although, we offer “big ticket” financing with
certain private label brand partners, which often involves larger
amounts. Relative to our co-brand loan portfolio, our private label
loan portfolio generally has higher revenue yields, and customers
with lower credit lines and lower credit scores.
Our co-brand credit cards are general purpose credit cards that can
be used to purchase goods and services from the applicable partner,
as well as other retailers wherever cards from those card networks
are accepted. We currently issue co-brand credit cards for use on
the MasterCard and Visa networks. Credit extended under our
co-branded credit cards typically is extended on standard terms
only. Charges made using a co-branded credit card, particularly
charges made outside of that co-brand partner, generate interchange
income for us. Relative to our private label loan portfolio, our
co-brand loan portfolio generally has lower revenue yields, and
customers with higher credit lines and higher credit scores (with
the majority of our co-brand customers having a Vantage score in
excess of 660).
As a general matter, the financial terms and conditions governing
our private label and co-brand credit card products vary by program
and product type and change over time, although we seek to
standardize the non-financial provisions consistently across all
products. The terms and conditions of all of our credit card
products are governed by a cardholder agreement and applicable laws
and regulations. We assign each card account a credit limit when
the account is initially opened. Thereafter, we may increase or
decrease individual credit limits from time to time, at our sole
discretion, based primarily on our evaluation of the customer’s
creditworthiness and ability to pay. For the vast majority of
accounts, periodic interest charges are calculated using the daily
balance method, which results in daily compounding of periodic
interest charges. Cash advances are not subject to a grace period,
and some credit card programs do not provide a grace period for
promotional purchases. In addition to periodic interest charges, we
may impose other charges and fees on credit card accounts,
including, as applicable and provided in the cardholder agreement,
late fees where a customer has not paid at least the minimum
payment due by the required due date. Typically, each customer with
an outstanding amount due on his or her credit card account must
make a minimum payment each month. A customer may pay the total
amount due at any time without penalty. We also may enter into
arrangements with delinquent customers to extend or otherwise
change payment schedules and to waive interest charges and/or fees.
To help further the ease with which customers can make payments, we
offer automatic payment functionality on all cardholder
accounts.
Bread CashbackTM
In April 2022, we launched our branded Bread
CashbackTM
American Express®
Credit Card, which is a direct-to-consumer, general purpose
cashback credit card. This open-network card is an important new
product for us to capture incremental spend and build and retain
customer relationships. We anticipate the Bread
CashbackTM
American Express®
Credit Card will increase our total addressable market, including
the Millennial and Gen Z populations. The Bread
CashbackTM
American Express®
Credit Card offers unlimited 2% cashback, no annual fee, no foreign
transaction fees, premium protection benefits, American
Express®
lifestyle benefits and instant mobile acquisition and wallet
provisioning. Prior to launching our new Bread
CashbackTM
American Express®
Credit Card, since 2020 we have offered our Comenity-branded
general purpose cash-back credit card.
Bread PayTM
Bread PayTM
is our pay-over-time payment technology solution, which includes
both our installment loan and “split-pay” offerings, as described
in more detail below. Through Bread PayTM,
we offer an omnichannel solution for over 700 SMB retailers and
merchants, and platform capabilities to bank partners. The Bread
PayTM
offerings and on-boarding capabilities enhance the growth prospects
of our industries and increase the addressable market of SMBs.
Bread PayTM
also offers our existing private label and co-brand credit card
partners a broader digital product suite and additional white-label
product solutions for those customers preferring a “closed-end”
payment option (i.e. a non-revolving loan with fixed repayment
terms). As part of our Bread PayTM
products, we offer a flexible platform and robust suite of
application programming interfaces (APIs) that allow merchants and
partners to seamlessly integrate online point-of-sale financing and
other digital payment products. As Bread PayTM
has grown, it has expanded our ability to leverage our digital
offerings to build both strategic technology platform partnerships
and more traditional brand partnership sales and
loans.
Our Bread PayTM
installment loans are closed-end credit accounts where the customer
pays down the outstanding balance in monthly installments,
typically over a 3 to 48 month period. The terms of our installment
loans are governed by customer agreements and applicable laws and
regulations. Installment loans are generally assessed interest
charges using fixed interest rates. We do not currently impose
other charges or fees on loan accounts, such as late fees where a
customer has not made the required payment by the required due date
or returned payment fees.
Our “split-pay” loans are short-term, interest-free financing, to
be repaid by the customer in four equal installments, with the
first payment due at the time of purchase and the remaining three
payments due in subsequent two-week intervals. The terms of our
split-pay loans are governed by customer agreements and applicable
laws and regulations. We do not currently impose charges or fees on
these split-pay loan accounts, such as late fees where a customer
has not made the required payment by the required due date or
returned payment fees.
We have also been working to grow revenue generated through various
Bread PayTM
strategic partnerships. For example, since 2021 we have licensed
our payments technology platform on a white-label basis to RBC
(NYSE:RY), a premier global financial services provider. RBC uses
our platform to operate its PayPlan by RBC solution, which allows
Canadian customers to pay for big-ticket items over time. We do not
originate the loans made through PayPlan, but instead earn
transaction and servicing fees. We are also working to expand our
partnership with Sezzle (ASX:SZL), which we announced in October
2021. We offer our installment or other loan products through
Sezzle’s merchant network.
Bread SavingsTM
Bread SavingsTM
refers to our direct-to-consumer, or retail, deposit products,
primarily in the form of certificates of deposit and savings
accounts. Our Bread SavingsTM
products support loan growth and improve our funding mix, making us
less reliant on our securitization programs and other sources of
wholesale funding. In recent years, retail deposits have become an
increasingly important source of funds for us, growing 72% from
$3.2 billion as of December 31, 2021 to $5.5 billion as of
December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2022, retail
deposits represented 26% of our total funding sources.
Our online Bread SavingsTM
platform is scalable allowing us to expand without having to rely
on a traditional “brick and mortar” branch network. We continue to
focus on growing our Bread SavingsTM
operations and believe we are well-positioned to continue to
benefit from the consumer-driven shift from branch banking to
direct banking. We seek to differentiate our deposit product
offerings from our competitors on the basis of rates we pay on
deposits, the quality of our customer service and the
competitiveness of our digital banking capabilities.
Services Supporting our Primary Product Offerings
Our primary product offerings, as described above, are supported
and enhanced by numerous services and capabilities that we provide,
including: (i) risk management, account origination and funding
services; (ii) loan processing and servicing; (iii) marketing and
data and analytics; and (iv) our Enhanced Digital
Suite.
Risk Management, Account Origination and Funding Services.
We provide risk management solutions, account origination and
funding services for our private label and co-brand credit card
programs, as well as our Bread PayTM
partnerships.
We process millions of credit card applications each year using
automated proprietary scoring technology and verification
procedures to make responsible risk-based underwriting and
origination decisions when approving new accounts and establishing
credit limits. Credit quality is monitored on a regular and
consistent basis, utilizing internal algorithms and external credit
bureau risk scores. This information helps us segment new and
existing customers into narrower risk ranges, allowing us to better
evaluate individual credit risk. As macroeconomic conditions have
weakened over the last year, we have continued to enhance our
credit risk management, including through stronger underwriting
resulting from enhanced technology, monitoring, and data, prudent
and proactive line management, well-established risk appetite
metrics, and we are proactively using our recession readiness
playbook. As of December 31, 2022 we had $20.1 billion in principal
loans from approximately 43 million active accounts, with an
average balance for the year ended December 31, 2022 of
approximately $870 for accounts with outstanding
balances.
Loan Processing and Servicing.
We manage and service the loans we originate for our private label
and co-brand credit card programs, as well as our Bread
CashbackTM
and Bread PayTM
products. In 2022, we completed the transition of our credit card
processing services to Fiserv, a leading global provider of
outsourced payments and financial services technology solutions;
with the transition we expect to improve our speed to market,
including the ability to quickly and seamlessly add new products
and capabilities that benefit our partners and cardholders. This
transition enables efficient integration of digital technology,
while supporting our data and analytics capabilities and improving
operational efficiencies.
Our customer care operations are influenced by our retail heritage
and we view every customer touch point as an opportunity to provide
an exceptional experience. Our customer care operations offer
omnichannel servicing, including phone, mail, fax, email, text and
web. We provide focused training programs in all areas to achieve
the highest possible customer service standards and monitor our
performance by conducting surveys with our partners and our
customers. In 2022, for the seventeenth time since 2003, we were
certified as a Center of Excellence for the quality of our
operations, the most prestigious ranking attainable, by
BenchmarkPortal. Founded by Purdue University in 1995,
BenchmarkPortal is a global leader of best practices for customer
care centers.
We blend domestic and off-shore locations as an important part of
our servicing strategy, to maintain service availability beyond
normal work hours in the United States and to optimize our cost
structure.
Marketing and Data & Analytics.
Through our integrated marketing services, we design and implement
strategies that assist our partners in acquiring, retaining and
expanding customer engagement to drive a more loyal, frequent
shopper that increases customer lifetime value. Our programs
capture transaction data that we analyze to better understand
consumer behavior and use to increase the effectiveness of our
partners’ marketing activities. Through our data and analytics
capabilities, including machine learning and artificial
intelligence, we focus on data insights that drive actionable
strategies and enhance revenue growth and customer retention. We
use multi-channel marketing communication tools, including
in-store, web, permission-based email, permission-based mobile
messaging and direct mail to engage customers in the channel of
their choice.
Enhanced Digital Suite.
Through our Enhanced Digital Suite, a group of marketing and credit
application features, we help our brand partners capitalize on
online trends by bringing through more qualified applicants, a
higher credit sales conversion rate and a higher average purchase
value. Enhanced Digital Suite includes a unified software
development kit (SDK) that provides access to our broad suite of
products; it also promotes credit payment options, relevant to the
customer, earlier in the shopping experience. The credit
application is simple and easy, offers prefilled fields and
pre-screens customers in real-time, allowing for immediate credit
approval without leaving the brand partner’s site.
For additional information relating to our business, business
strategy and products and services, see “Item 7. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations – Year in Review – Business Environment”.
Technology/Systems
We leverage information and technology to help achieve our business
objectives and to develop and deliver products and services that
satisfy our brand partners and customers’ needs. A key part of our
strategic focus is the development and use of efficient, flexible
computer and operational systems, such as cloud technology, to
support complex marketing and account management strategies, the
servicing of our customers, and the development of new and
diversified products. We believe the continued development and
integration of these systems is an important part of our efforts to
reduce costs, improve quality and security, and provide faster,
more flexible technology services. Consequently, we continuously
review capabilities and develop or acquire systems, processes and
competencies to meet our unique business requirements.
As part of our continuous efforts to review and improve our
technologies, we may either develop such capabilities internally or
rely on third-party outsourcers who have the ability to deliver
technology that is of higher quality, lower cost, or both. We
continue to rely on third-party outsourcers to help us deliver
systems and operational infrastructure; these relationships include
(but are not limited to): Microsoft and
Amazon Web Services, Inc.
for our cloud infrastructure and Fiserv for credit card processing
services.
We are committed to safeguarding our customers’ and our own
information and technology, implementing backup and recovery
systems, and generally require the same of our third-party service
providers. We take measures that mitigate against known attacks and
use internal and external resources to scan for vulnerabilities in
platforms, systems, and applications necessary for delivering our
products and services. For a discussion of the risks associated
with our use of technology systems, see “Part I—Item 1A. Risk
Factors” under the heading “Cybersecurity, Technology and Vendor
Risks”.
Disaster and Contingency Planning
We operate, either internally or through third-party service
providers, multiple data processing centers to store and otherwise
process our customer transaction data. Given the significant amount
of data that we or our third-party service providers manage, much
of which is real-time data to support our partners’ commerce
initiatives, we have established redundant capabilities for our
data centers. We have a number of safeguards in place that are
designed to protect us from data-related risks and in the event of
a disaster, to restore our data centers’ systems. For additional
information, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors – Risk Management –
Operational Risk”.
Protection of Intellectual Property and Other Proprietary
Rights
We rely on a combination of patents, copyright, trade secret and
trademark laws, confidentiality procedures, contractual provisions
and other similar measures to protect our proprietary information
and technology used in our business. We generally enter into
confidentiality or license agreements with our employees,
consultants and corporate partners, and generally control access to
and distribution of our technology, documentation and other
proprietary information. Despite the efforts to protect our
proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or
otherwise obtain the use of our products or technology that we
consider proprietary and third parties may attempt to develop
similar technology independently. We have a number of domestic and
foreign patents and pending patent applications. We pursue
registration and protection of our trademarks primarily in the
United States, although we also have either registered trademarks
or applications pending for certain marks in other countries. No
individual patent or license is material to us or our
business.
Competition
The markets for our products and services are highly competitive,
continuously changing, highly innovative, and subject to regulatory
scrutiny and oversight. We compete with a wide range of businesses,
including major financial institutions and financial technology
firms, or fintechs. Some of our current and potential competitors
may be larger than we are, have larger customer bases, greater
brand recognition, longer operating histories, a dominant or more
secure position, broader geographic scope, volume, scale,
resources, and market share than we do, or offer products and
services that we do not offer. Other competitors are smaller or
younger companies that may be more agile in responding quickly to
regulatory and technological changes. Many of the areas in which we
compete evolve rapidly with innovative and disruptive technologies,
emerging competitors, business alliances, shifting consumer habits
and user needs, price sensitivity on the part of merchants and
consumers, and frequent introductions of new products and services.
The consumer credit and payments industry is highly competitive and
we face an increasingly dynamic industry as emerging technologies
enter the marketplace.
In competing to acquire and retain the business of brand partners
and customers, our primary competition is with other financial
institutions whose marketing focus has been on developing credit
card programs with attractive value propositions and
consequentially large revolving balances. These competitors further
drive their businesses by cross-selling their other financial
products to their cardholders. We also compete for partners on the
basis of a number of factors, including program financial and other
terms, underwriting standards and capabilities, marketing
expertise, service levels, the breadth of our product and service
offerings, digital, technological and integration capabilities,
brand recognition and reputation. Our focus is on retailers and
other brand partners that understand the competitive advantage of
developing loyal customers. As a result, we focus on analyzing
transaction data we obtain through partner loyalty programs and
managing our lending programs, including customer specific
transaction data and overall consumer spending patterns, to develop
and implement successful marketing strategies for our
partners.
As a form of payment, our customers have numerous consumer credit
and other payment options available to them, and our products
compete with cash, checks, electronic bank transfers, debit cards,
general purpose credit cards (including Visa, MasterCard, American
Express and Discover Card), various forms of consumer installment
loans and split-pay products, other private label card brands,
prepaid cards, digital wallets and mobile payment solutions, and
other tools that simplify and personalize shopping experiences for
consumers and merchants. Among other factors, our products compete
with these other forms of payment on the basis of interest rates
and fees, credit limits, reward programs and other product
features. As the payments industry continues to evolve, in the
future we expect increasing competition with emerging payment
technologies from financial technology firms and payment networks.
Moreover, some of our competitors, including new and emerging
competitors in the digital and mobile payments space, are not
subject to the same regulatory requirements or legislative scrutiny
to which we are subject, which could place us at a competitive
disadvantage.
In our retail deposits business, we have acquisition and servicing
capabilities similar to other direct-banking competitors. We
compete for deposits with traditional banks, and in seeking to grow
our Bread SavingsTM
platform, we compete with other banks that have direct-banking
models similar to ours. Competition among direct banks is intense
because online banking provides customers the ability to quickly
and easily deposit and withdraw funds, and open and close accounts
in favor of products and services offered by
competitors.
Supervision and Regulation
We operate primarily through our insured depository institution
subsidiaries, Comenity Bank (CB) and Comenity Capital Bank (CCB),
which, as noted above, together are referred to herein as the
“Banks”. Federal and state laws and regulations extensively
regulate the operations of the Banks. This regulatory framework is
intended to protect individual consumers, depositors, the Deposit
Insurance Fund (DIF) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC) and the U.S. banking system as a whole, rather than for the
protection of stockholders and creditors. Set forth below is a
summary of the significant laws and regulations applicable to each
of CB and CCB. The description that follows is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the full text of the statutes,
regulations, and policies that are described. Such statutes,
regulations, and policies are subject to ongoing review by
Congress, state legislatures, and federal and state regulatory
agencies. A change in any of the statutes, regulations, or
regulatory policies applicable to CB and/or CCB, or in the
leadership or direction of our regulators, could have a material
effect on the operations or financial condition of Bread Financial
Holdings, Inc. Further, the scope of regulation and the intensity
of supervision will likely remain high in the current regulatory
environment.
CB is a Delaware-chartered bank operating as a credit card bank
under a Competitive Equality Banking Act (CEBA) exemption from the
definition of “bank” under the Bank Holding Company Act (BHC Act).
To maintain its status as a CEBA credit card bank, CB must continue
to comply with the following requirements:
•engage
only in credit card operations;
•do
not accept demand deposits or deposits that the depositor may
withdraw by check or similar means for payment to third
parties;
•do
not accept any savings or time deposits of less than $100,000,
except for deposits pledged as collateral for its extensions of
credit;
•maintain
only one office that accepts deposits; and
•do
not engage in the business of making commercial loans (except
credit card loans to certain small businesses).
CB is subject to prudential regulation, supervision and examination
by the Delaware Office of the State Bank Commissioner, as its
chartering authority, and the FDIC as its primary federal
regulator. CB’s deposits are insured by the DIF of the FDIC up to
the applicable deposit insurance limits in accordance with
applicable law and FDIC regulations. CB is not a member of the
Federal Reserve System.
CCB is a Utah-chartered industrial bank. As an industrial bank, CCB
is exempt from the definition of “bank” under the BHC Act. CCB is
subject to prudential regulation, supervision and examination by
the Utah Department of Financial Institutions, as its chartering
authority, and the FDIC as its primary federal regulator. CCB’s
deposits are insured by the DIF of the FDIC up to the applicable
deposit insurance limits in accordance with applicable law and FDIC
regulations. CCB is not a member of the Federal Reserve
System.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) promulgates
regulations for the federal consumer financial protection laws and
supervises and examines large banks (those with more than $10
billion of total assets) with respect to those laws. Banks in a
multi-bank organization, such as CB and CCB, are subject to
supervision and examination by the CFPB with respect to the federal
consumer financial protection laws if at least one bank reports
total assets over $10 billion for four consecutive quarters. While
the Banks were subject to supervision and examination by the CFPB
with respect to the federal consumer financial protection laws
between 2016 and 2021, this reverted to the FDIC in 2022. However,
CCB’s total assets then exceeded $10 billion for four consecutive
quarters as of September 30, 2022, and both Banks are now again
subject to supervision and examination by the CFPB with respect to
federal consumer protection laws.
The CFPB has broad rulemaking authority that has impacted, and is
expected to continue impacting, the Banks’ operations, including
with respect to credit card late fees and other amounts that we may
charge. For example, the CFPB’s rulemaking authority may allow it
to change regulations adopted in the past by other regulators
including regulations issued under the Truth in Lending Act by the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve
Board).
Most recently, in February 2023, the CFPB published a proposed rule
with request for public comment that would: (i) decrease the safe
harbor dollar amount for credit card late fees to $8 and eliminate
a higher safe harbor dollar amount for subsequent late payments;
(ii) eliminate the annual inflation adjustments that currently
exist for the late fee safe harbor dollar amounts; and (iii)
require that late fees not exceed 25% of the consumer’s required
minimum payment. The “safe harbor” dollar amounts referenced in the
CFPB’s proposed rulemaking refer to the amounts that credit card
issuers may charge as late fees under the Credit Card
Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (CARD
Act). Under the CARD Act, as implemented, these safe harbor amounts
have been subject to annual adjustment based on changes in the
consumer price index, and the safe harbor amounts are currently set
at $30 for an initial late fee and $41 for subsequent late fees in
one of the next six billing cycles. Accordingly, the proposed $8
safe harbor amount on late fees (and proposed elimination of the
annual inflation-based adjustment thereto) would represent a
significant decrease from the current safe harbor amounts. In
addition, the proposed rulemaking seeks comment on whether late
fees should be prohibited if the applicable payment is made within
15 days of the due date and whether, as a condition to utilizing
the safe harbor, credit card issuers should be required to offer
automatic payment options and/or provide certain notifications of
upcoming payment due dates. We are closely monitoring the content
and timing of the CFPB’s proposed rulemaking and its impact on our
business.
More generally, the CFPB’s ability to rescind, modify or interpret
past regulatory guidance could reduce fee income, increase our
compliance costs and litigation exposure. Further, the CFPB has
broad authority to enforce the prohibitions of “unfair, deceptive
or abusive” acts or practices regardless of which agency supervises
the Banks. The CFPB has taken enforcement action against other
credit card issuers and financial services companies. Evolution of
these standards could result in changes to pricing, practices,
procedures and other activities relating to our credit card
accounts in ways that could reduce the associated return from those
accounts and potentially impact business growth plans. While the
CFPB has taken public positions on certain matters, it is unclear
what additional changes may be promulgated by the CFPB and what
effect, if any, such changes would have on our credit
accounts.
The
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010
(Dodd-Frank
Act) authorizes certain state officials to enforce regulations
issued by the CFPB and to enforce the Dodd- Frank Act’s general
prohibition against unfair, deceptive or abusive practices. To the
extent that states enact requirements that differ from federal
standards or courts adopt interpretations of federal consumer laws
that differ from those adopted by the FDIC, the Federal Reserve
Board and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currently
(collectively, the Federal Banking Agencies), we may be required to
alter products or services offered in some jurisdictions or cease
offering products, which will increase compliance costs and reduce
our ability to offer the same products and services to consumers
nationwide.
Regulation of Bread Financial Holdings, Inc.
Because neither CB nor CCB is considered a “bank” within the
meaning of the BHC Act, Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. is not a
bank holding company (BHC) subject to regulation thereunder. If any
of our entities became subject to regulation as a BHC, among other
things, Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. and its non-bank
subsidiaries would be subject to regulation, supervision and
examination by the Federal Reserve Board and our operations would
be limited to certain activities that are closely related to
banking or financial services in nature.
However, under Section 616 of the Dodd-Frank Act, any company that
directly or indirectly controls an insured depository institution
is required to serve as a source of financial strength to its
subsidiary institution and may not conduct its operations in an
unsafe or unsound manner. This doctrine is commonly known as the
“Source of Strength” doctrine. As such a company, this means that
Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. must stand ready to use available
resources to provide adequate capital funds to the Banks during
periods of financial stress or adversity and should maintain the
financial flexibility and capital-raising capacity to obtain
additional resources to support the Banks. This support may be
required at times when Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. might
otherwise have determined not to provide it or when doing so is not
otherwise in the interests of Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. or its
stockholders or creditors. Bread Financial Holdings, Inc.’s failure
to meet its obligation to serve as a source of strength to the
Banks would generally be considered to be an unsafe and unsound
banking practice.
Regulation of the Banks
Federal and state banking laws and regulations govern, among other
things, the scope of a bank’s business, the investments a bank may
make, the reserves against deposits a bank must maintain, the loans
a bank makes and collateral it takes, the activities of a bank with
respect to mergers and acquisitions, management practices, and
numerous other aspects of its operations.
Regulatory Capital Requirements
The Banks are subject to certain risk-based capital and leverage
ratio requirements under the U.S. Basel III capital rules adopted
by the FDIC. These rules implement the Basel III international
regulatory capital standards in the United States, as well as
certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. These quantitative
calculations are minimums, and the FDIC may determine that a bank,
based on its size, complexity, or risk profile, must maintain a
higher level of capital in order to operate in a safe and sound
manner.
Under the U.S. Basel III capital rules, the Banks’ assets,
exposures, and certain off-balance sheet items are subject to risk
weights used to determine an institution’s risk-weighted assets,
which then are used to determine the minimum capital that CB and
CCB should keep as a reserve to reduce the risk of insolvency.
These risk-weighted assets are used to calculate the following
minimum capital ratios for the Banks:
•Common
Equity Tier 1 (CET1) Risk-Based Capital Ratio - the ratio of CET1
capital to risk-weighted assets. CET1 capital primarily includes
common stockholders’ equity subject to certain regulatory
adjustments and deductions, including goodwill, intangible assets,
certain deferred tax assets, and Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income (AOCI).
•Tier
1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio - the ratio of Tier 1 capital to
risk-weighted assets. Tier 1 capital is primarily comprised of CET1
capital, perpetual preferred stock, and certain qualifying capital
instruments.
•Total
Risk-Based Capital Ratio - the ratio of total capital, including
CET1 capital, Tier 1 capital, and Tier 2 capital, to risk-weighted
assets. Tier 2 capital primarily includes qualifying subordinated
debt and qualifying Allowance for credit losses.
The Banks are also subject to the requirements of a fourth ratio,
the Leverage ratio, which itself does not incorporate risk-weighted
assets:
•Tier
1 Leverage Ratio - the ratio of Tier 1 capital to quarterly average
assets (net of goodwill, certain other intangible assets, and
certain other deductions).
Failure to be well-capitalized or to meet minimum capital
requirements could result in certain mandatory and possible
additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken,
could have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial
condition. Failure to be well-capitalized or to meet minimum
capital requirements could also result in restrictions on the
Banks’ ability to pay dividends or otherwise distribute capital or
to receive regulatory approval of applications.
The U.S. Basel III capital rules require a minimum CET1 Risk-Based
Capital Ratio of 4.5%, a minimum Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio of
6.0%, and a minimum Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio of 8.0%. In
addition to meeting the minimum capital requirements, under the
U.S. Basel III capital rules, the Banks must also maintain the
required 2.5% Capital Conservation Buffer to avoid becoming subject
to restrictions on capital distributions and certain discretionary
bonus payments to executive management. The Capital Conservation
Buffer is calculated as a ratio of CET1 capital to risk-weighted
assets, and it essentially increases the required minimum
risk-based capital ratios. As a result, the Banks must maintain a
CET1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio of at least 7%, a Tier 1 Risk-Based
Capital Ratio of at least 8.5% and a Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio
of at least 10.5% to avoid being subject to restrictions on capital
distributions and discretionary
bonus payments to its executive management. The Tier 1 Leverage
Ratio is not impacted by the Capital Conservation Buffer, and a
bank may be considered well-capitalized while remaining out of
compliance with the Capital Conservation Buffer. The required
minimum Tier 1 Leverage Ratio for all banks and BHCs is
4%.
To be considered well-capitalized, the Banks must maintain the
following capital ratios which are in excess of the minimums
described above:
•CET1
Risk-Based Capital Ratio of 6.5% or greater;
•Tier
1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio of 8.0% or greater;
•Total
Risk-Based Capital Ratio of 10.0% or greater; and
•Tier
1 Leverage Ratio of 5.0% or greater.
As of
December 31, 2022,
the Banks’ regulatory capital ratios were above the
well-capitalized standards and met the Capital Conservation Buffer.
The Banks seek to maintain capital levels and ratios in excess of
the minimum regulatory requirements inclusive of the 2.5% Capital
Conservation Buffer.
Dividends
Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. is a legal entity separate and
distinct from the Banks. Declaration and payment of cash dividends
depends upon cash dividend payments to Bread Financial Holdings,
Inc. by the Banks, which are our primary source of revenue and cash
flow. As state-chartered banks, under Delaware or Utah law, as
applicable, the Banks are subject to regulatory restrictions on the
payment and amounts of dividends. Further, the ability of the Banks
to pay dividends to Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. is also subject
to their profitability, financial condition, capital expenditures
and other cash flow requirements, and any such dividends are also
subject to the approval of the Board of Directors of the applicable
Bank.
The payment of dividends by the Banks and Bread Financial Holdings,
Inc. may also be affected by other factors, such as the requirement
to maintain adequate capital above regulatory requirements. The
Federal Banking Agencies have indicated that paying dividends that
deplete a bank’s capital base to an inadequate level would be an
unsafe and unsound banking practice; a bank may not pay any
dividend if payment would cause it to become undercapitalized or if
it already is undercapitalized. Moreover, the Federal Banking
Agencies have issued policy statements that provide that banks
should generally only pay dividends out of current operating
earnings. The Federal Banking Agencies have the authority to
prohibit banks from paying a dividend if it is deemed that such
payment would be an unsafe or unsound practice.
Prompt Corrective Action and Safety and Soundness
Under applicable “prompt corrective action” (PCA) statutes and
regulations, insured depository institutions, such as the Banks,
are placed into one of five capital categories, ranging from “well
capitalized” to “critically undercapitalized”. The PCA statute and
regulations provide for progressively more stringent supervisory
measures as an institution’s capital category declines. An
institution that is not well capitalized is generally prohibited
from accepting brokered deposits and offering interest rates on
deposits higher than the prevailing rate in its market. An
undercapitalized institution must submit an acceptable restoration
plan to the appropriate Federal Banking Agency. One requisite
element of such a plan is that the institution’s parent holding
company guarantee the institution’s compliance with the plan,
subject to certain limitations. As of
December 31, 2022,
the Banks qualified as “well capitalized” under applicable
regulatory capital standards.
Insured depository institutions may also be subject to potential
enforcement actions of varying levels of severity by the Federal
Banking Agencies for unsafe or unsound practices in conducting
their businesses, or for violation of any law, rule, regulation,
condition imposed in writing by the agency, or term of a written
agreement with the agency. In more serious cases, enforcement
actions may include the issuance of directives to increase capital;
the issuance of formal and informal agreements; the imposition of
civil monetary penalties; the issuance of a cease and desist order
that can be judicially enforced; the issuance of removal and
prohibition orders against officers, directors, and other
institution-affiliated parties; the termination of the
institution’s deposit insurance; the appointment of a conservator
or receiver for the institution; and the enforcement of such
actions through injunctions or restraining orders based upon a
judicial determination that the FDIC, as receiver, would be harmed
if such equitable relief was not granted.
Reserve Requirements
Federal Reserve Board regulations require insured depository
institutions to maintain cash reserves against their transaction
accounts, primarily interest-bearing and regular checking accounts.
The required cash reserves can be in the form of vault
cash and, if vault cash does not fully satisfy the required cash
reserves, in the form of a balance maintained with Federal Reserve
Banks. The regulations authorize different ranges of reserve
requirement ratios depending on the amount of transaction account
balances held. A zero percent reserve requirement ratio is applied
to transaction balances below the reserve requirement exemption
amount. In addition, transaction account balances maintained over
the reserve requirement exemption amount and up to a certain
amount, known as the low reserve tranche, may be subject to a
reserve requirement ratio of not more than 3 percent (and which may
be zero), and transaction account balances over the low reserve
tranche may be subject to a reserve requirement ratio of not more
than 14 percent (and which may be zero). The reserve requirement
exemption and the low reserve tranche are both subject to
adjustment on an annual basis, as applicable, by the Federal
Reserve Board. Effective March 26, 2020, in response to the
COVID-19 pandemic, the reserve requirement ratios on all net
transaction accounts were reduced to zero percent, thereby
eliminating reserve requirements for all depository institutions.
The annual indexation of the reserve requirement exemption amount
and the low reserve tranche for 2021, 2022 and 2023 was required by
statute, but did not affect depository institutions’ reserve
requirements, which remain at zero.
Federal Deposit Insurance
The deposits of the Banks are insured up to applicable limits by
the DIF of the FDIC. The current standard maximum deposit insurance
amount is $250,000 per depositor, per insured depository
institution, per ownership category, in accordance with applicable
FDIC regulations.
The FDIC uses a risk-based assessment system that imposes insurance
premiums based on a risk matrix that takes into account an
institution’s capital level and supervisory rating. The base for
insurance assessments is the average consolidated total assets less
tangible equity capital of an institution. Assessment rates are
calculated using formulas that take into account the risk of the
institution being assessed.
Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the FDIA), the FDIC may
terminate an institution’s deposit insurance upon a finding that
the institution has engaged in unsafe and unsound practices, is in
an unsafe and unsound condition or has violated any applicable law,
regulation, order or condition imposed by the FDIC.
Depositor Preference
The FDIA provides that, in the event of the liquidation or other
resolution of an insured depository institution, the claims of
depositors of the institution, including the claims of the FDIC as
subrogee of insured depositors, and certain claims for
administrative expenses of the FDIC as a receiver, will have
priority over other general unsecured claims against the
institution. If an insured depository institution fails, insured
and uninsured depositors, along with the FDIC, will have priority
in payment ahead of unsecured, non-deposit creditors, including the
parent company, with respect to any extensions of credit they have
made to such insured depository institution.
Restrictions on Transactions with Affiliates and
Insiders
Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act limit the extent to
which we can borrow or otherwise obtain credit from, or engage in
other covered transactions with either of the Banks, which may have
the effect of limiting the extent to which either Bank can finance
or otherwise supply funds to us. “Covered transactions” include
loans or extensions of credit, purchases of or investments in
securities, purchases of assets, including assets subject to an
agreement to repurchase, acceptance of securities as collateral for
a loan or extension of credit, or the issuance of a guarantee,
acceptance, or letter of credit. Although the applicable rules do
not serve as an outright bar on engaging in covered transactions,
they do require that we engage in “covered transactions” with
either Bank only on terms and under circumstances that are
substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the Bank, as
those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with
nonaffiliated companies. Furthermore, with certain exceptions, each
loan or extension of credit by either Bank to us or our non-bank
subsidiaries must be secured by collateral with a market value
ranging from 100% to 130% of the amount of the loan or extension of
credit, depending on the type of collateral.
The Banks are also subject to Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the
Federal Reserve Act, and the implementing Regulation O as applied
to the Banks. These provisions impose limitations on loans and
extensions of credit by the Banks to their executive officers,
directors and principal stockholders and their related interests,
as well as those of the Banks’ affiliates. The limitations restrict
the terms and aggregate amount of such transactions. Regulation O
also imposes certain recordkeeping and reporting
requirements.
Restrictions on transactions with affiliates and insiders under
Federal Reserve Act Sections 23A, 23B, 22(g) and 22(h), as well as
the requirements of Regulation O, are monitored for compliance by
our internal audit department.
Volcker Rule
Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act, commonly known as the Volcker
Rule, restricts the ability of banking entities, such as Bread
Financial Holdings, Inc. and the Banks, from (i) engaging in
proprietary trading and (ii) investing in or sponsoring covered
funds, subject to certain limited exceptions. Under the Volcker
Rule, the term covered funds is defined as any issuer that would be
an investment company under the Investment Company Act but for the
exemption in section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of that Act, which includes
collateralized loan obligation securities (CLO) and collateralized
debt obligation securities. There are also several exemptions from
the definition of covered funds, including, among other things,
loan securitization, joint ventures, certain types of foreign
funds, entities issuing asset-backed commercial paper, and
registered investment companies. We do not engage in these
restricted activities, including in proprietary
trading.
Incentive Compensation
The Dodd-Frank Act requires the Federal Banking Agencies and the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to establish joint
regulations or guidelines prohibiting incentive-based payment
arrangements at specified regulated entities, including the Banks,
that encourage inappropriate risks by providing an executive
officer, employee, director or principal stockholder with excessive
compensation, fees, or benefits resulting from inappropriate risk
taking, as these actions could lead to material financial loss to
the entity. The Federal Banking Agencies and the SEC most recently
proposed such regulations in 2016, but the regulations have not yet
been finalized. If the regulations are adopted in the form
initially proposed, the manner in which executive compensation is
structured will be restricted.
The Dodd-Frank Act also requires publicly traded companies to give
stockholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation at least
every three years and on so-called “golden parachute” payments in
connection with approvals of mergers and acquisitions. Bread
Financial Holdings, Inc. has held its “say-on-pay” vote
annually.
USA PATRIOT Act
Under Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act, all financial institutions
are required to take certain measures to identify their customers,
prevent money laundering, monitor customer transactions, and report
suspicious activity to U.S. law enforcement agencies. Financial
institutions also are required to respond to requests for
information from Federal Banking Agencies and law enforcement
agencies. Information sharing among financial institutions for the
above purposes is encouraged by an exemption granted to complying
financial institutions from the privacy provisions of the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) and other privacy laws. Financial
institutions that hold correspondent accounts for foreign banks or
provide private banking services to foreign individuals are
required to take measures to avoid dealing with certain foreign
individuals or entities, including foreign banks with profiles that
raise money laundering concerns, and are prohibited from dealing
with foreign “shell banks” and persons from jurisdictions of
particular concern. The Federal Banking Agencies and the Secretary
of the Treasury have adopted regulations to implement several of
these provisions. All financial institutions also are required to
establish internal anti-money laundering programs. The
effectiveness of a financial institution in combating money
laundering activities is a factor to be considered in any
application submitted by a financial institution to engage in a
merger transaction under the Bank Merger Act. The Banks have in
place a Bank Secrecy Act and USA PATRIOT Act compliance program and
engage in very few transactions of any kind with foreign financial
institutions or foreign persons.
Office of Foreign Assets Control Regulations
The United States government has imposed economic sanctions that
affect transactions with designated foreign countries, nationals,
and others. These are typically known as the “OFAC” rules based on
their administration by the U.S. Treasury Department Office of
Foreign Assets Control. The Office of Foreign Assets
Control-administered sanctions targeting countries take many
different forms. Generally, OFAC sanctions contain one or more of
the following elements: (i) restrictions on trade with or
investment in a sanctioned country, including prohibitions against
direct or indirect imports from and exports to a sanctioned country
and prohibitions on U.S. persons engaging in financial transactions
relating to making investments in, or providing investment-related
advice or assistance to, a sanctioned country; and (ii) a blocking
of assets in which the government or specially designated nationals
of the sanctioned country have an interest, by prohibiting
transfers of property subject to U.S. jurisdiction (including
property in the possession or control of U.S. persons). Blocked
assets (e.g., property and bank deposits) cannot be paid out,
withdrawn, set off, or transferred in any manner without
a
license from the Office of Foreign Assets Control. Failure to
comply with these sanctions could have serious legal and
reputational consequences.
Identity Theft
The SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) jointly
issued final rules and guidelines implementing the provisions of
the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), as amended by the Dodd-Frank
Act, which require certain regulated entities to establish programs
to address risks of identity theft. The rules require financial
institutions and creditors to develop and implement a written
identity theft prevention program that is designed to detect,
prevent, and mitigate identity theft in connection with certain
existing accounts or the opening of new accounts. The rules include
guidelines to assist entities in the formulation and maintenance of
programs that would satisfy these requirements. In addition, the
rules establish special requirements for any credit and debit card
issuers that are subject to the jurisdiction of the SEC or the CFTC
to assess the validity of notifications of changes of address under
certain circumstances. The Banks implemented an ID Theft Prevention
Program, approved by their Boards of Directors, in compliance with
these requirements.
Community Reinvestment Act
The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (CRA) is intended to
encourage banks to help meet the credit needs of their service
areas, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods, consistent
with safe and sound business practices. The relevant Federal
Banking Agency, the FDIC in the Banks’ case, examines each bank and
assigns it a public CRA rating. A bank’s record of fair lending
compliance is part of the resulting CRA examination report. CRA
performance evaluations are based on a four-tiered rating system:
Outstanding, Satisfactory, Needs to Improve and Substantial
Noncompliance. CRA performance evaluations are considered in
evaluating applications for such things as mergers, acquisitions
and applications to open branches. The Banks each received a CRA
rating of “Outstanding” at their most recent CRA
examinations.
Consumer Protection Regulation and Supervision
We are subject to the federal consumer financial protection laws
implemented by the CFPB.
We are also subject to certain state consumer protection laws and
state attorneys general and other state officials are empowered to
enforce certain federal consumer protection laws and regulations.
State authorities have increased their focus on and enforcement of
consumer protection rules. These federal and state consumer
protection laws apply to a broad range of our activities and to
various aspects of our business, and include laws relating to
interest rates, fair lending, disclosures of credit terms and
estimated transaction costs to consumer borrowers, debt collection
practices, the use and provision of information to consumer
reporting agencies, and the prohibition of unfair, deceptive, or
abusive acts or practices in connection with the offer, sale, or
provision of consumer financial products and services. Each Bank
has in place an effective compliance management system to comply
with these laws and regulations.
Privacy, Information Security and Data Protection
We are subject to various privacy, information security and data
protection laws, including requirements concerning security breach
notification. For example, in the United States, we are subject to
the GLBA and implementing regulations and guidance. Among other
things, the GLBA: (i) imposes certain limitations on the ability of
financial institutions to share consumers’ nonpublic personal
information with nonaffiliated third parties; (ii) requires that
financial institutions provide certain disclosures to consumers
about their information collection, sharing and security practices
and affords consumers the right to “opt out” of the institution’s
disclosure of their personal financial information to nonaffiliated
third parties (with certain exceptions); and (iii) requires
financial institutions to develop, implement and maintain a written
comprehensive information security program containing safeguards
that are appropriate to the financial institution’s size and
complexity, the nature and scope of the financial institution’s
activities, the sensitivity of consumer information processed by
the financial institution as well as plans for responding to data
security breaches.
Federal and state laws also require us to respond appropriately to
data security breaches. A final rule issued by the Federal Reserve,
OCC, and FDIC, which became effective in May 2022, requires banking
organizations to notify their primary federal regulator of
significant computer security incidents within 36 hours of
determining that such an incident has occurred.
In 2018, the State of California enacted the California Consumer
Privacy Act (CCPA). The CCPA requires covered businesses to comply
with requirements that give consumers the right to know what
information is being collected from them and whether such
information is sold or disclosed to third parties. The statute also
allows consumers to access, delete, and prevent the sale of
personal information that has been collected by covered businesses
in certain circumstances. The CCPA does not apply to personal
information collected, processed, sold, or disclosed pursuant to
the GLBA or the California Financial Information Privacy Act. We
are a covered business under the CCPA, which became effective on
January 1, 2020. In 2020, the State of California amended the CCPA
by passing a ballot initiative known as the California Privacy
Rights Act. This initiative added a number of requirements to the
CCPA with which we are finalizing our compliance.
We continue to monitor, and have a program in place to comply with,
applicable privacy, information security and data protection
requirements imposed by federal, state, and foreign laws. However,
if we experience a significant cybersecurity incident or our
regulators deemed our information security controls to be
inadequate, we could be subject to supervisory criticism or
penalties, and/or suffer reputational harm. For further discussion
of privacy, data protection and cybersecurity, and related risks
for our business, see “Part I—Item 1A. Risk Factors” under the
headings
“Regulation in the areas of privacy, data protection, data
governance, account access and information and cyber security could
increase our costs and affect or limit our business opportunities
and how we collect and/or use personal information”, “Failure to
safeguard our data and consumer privacy could affect our reputation
among our partners and their customers, and may expose us to legal
claims”,
and
“Business interruptions, including loss of data center capacity,
interruption due to cyber-attacks, loss of network connectivity or
inability to utilize proprietary software of third party vendors,
could affect our ability to timely meet the needs of our partners
and customers and harm our business”.
Human Capital
As of December 31, 2022, we employed approximately 7,500
associates worldwide, with the majority concentrated in the United
States. Attracting, developing and retaining top talent is critical
to our business. As a core component of our broader Environmental,
Social and Corporate Governance (ESG) and sustainability efforts,
our key human capital management objective is to promote an
inclusive, engaged culture that empowers associates through
opportunities to grow, develop and lead. Our associates have been,
and will remain, the backbone of our business, and we take a
holistic approach to our associates’ experiences, recognizing that
an engaged workforce drives our long-term growth and
sustainability. Our Board of Directors and Compensation & Human
Capital Committee provide the important oversight of our human
capital management strategy, including diversity, equity and
inclusion (DE&I) efforts, which are led by our Head of
Diversity and Inclusion and our Chief Diversity Officer. Our
Compensation & Human Capital Committee and our full Board of
Directors receive regular updates from senior management and
third-party consultants on human capital trends and developments,
and other key human capital matters that drive our ongoing success
and performance.
Associate Health and Wellbeing
Associate health and wellbeing remains a top human capital
priority, and we are committed to providing our associates with
competitive total compensation, benefits and wellness resources.
Our associates continue to express enthusiasm for the flexible
remote work policies that we adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic,
and approximately 95% of our total workforce continues to
successfully work from home, either on a fully-remote or hybrid
basis. We intend to continue these flexible work arrangements,
seeking to take advantage of the engagement and productivity
benefits associated with increased flexibility, as well as
opportunities for connectedness and social interaction. Other
associate wellbeing resources include mental health awareness and
counselling support, financial education and wellness courses, a
variety of fitness and meditation classes, a wellbeing cost
reimbursement program and other benefits to promote mental and
physical health supportive of holistic wellbeing.
Additionally, during 2022 we further improved the competitiveness
of our associate benefit offerings, including: (i) enhancements to
our medical benefits, such as the removal of a 30-day waiting
period for new hires to enroll and the addition of travel benefits
for reproductive and other fertility services; (ii) improvements to
our paid time off and flex time off policies; (iii) the addition of
two new paid holidays (bringing the total to 11); and (iv) expanded
mental health services, including increased access to free therapy
sessions, dedicated care navigators and mental health medication
management services.
Associate Experience and Engagement
Delivering an exceptional experience for our customers relies on
our ability to cultivate an engaging and rewarding experience for
our associates. We maintained high levels of associate engagement
and retention in 2022 and were successful with talent acquisition,
hiring several top industry leaders in key positions that further
supported our transformation initiatives and business priorities.
As discussed further below, in 2022 we continued to focus on
developing our internal talent to increase lateral movement across
the organization, with 34% of the 592 new jobs posted in 2022 being
ultimately filled by internal candidates. We continue to listen to
and act on feedback from our associates, including through our
annual Associate Survey and other more frequent surveys and
communications. Each year after the results of the annual Associate
Survey have been tabulated, our senior management presents those
results to our Compensation & Human Capital Committee and our
Board of Directors, including discussion regarding trends observed
and actions to be taken in response to the results.
Input from our Board helps inform our human capital strategies and
objectives going forward; our global themes for 2023 include
promoting career opportunities for our associates, further
optimizing our future work environment and ensuring associates have
the appropriate tools, resources and technology to work
effectively, whether in-office or remote.
Workforce Readiness, Growth and Advancement
As part of our broader multi-year business transformation, our
“future workforce” steering committee, comprised of senior human
resources, technology and operations management, continued to
develop and execute human capital-intensive strategies to ensure
our workforce readiness, growth and advancement. During the year we
completed our second-annual, six-month apprenticeship program,
which created a feeder pipeline from roles in our Care Centers to
other non-Care Center opportunities across the organization, with
22 U.S. associates (or 96% of program participants) transitioning
to new roles at the conclusion of their apprenticeships. Robust
training and development remains central to our human capital
strategy, and in 2022 we expanded our training programs to include
a more advanced mentorship program that matches associates with an
internal mentor who will help further their unique career journey
and development needs. In addition to career-oriented training and
development, we require annual associate training to ensure ongoing
adherence to responsible business practices and ethical conduct,
and all associates must certify annually that they have read and
will adhere to our Code of Ethics. We believe these efforts
resonated with our associates, as we saw a 3% improvement in
associates’ perceptions of the professional growth and development
initiatives taken by us, reflected in our 2022 annual Associate
Survey.
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
We are committed to creating an inclusive culture that attracts and
values diversity - of thought, experience, background, skills and
ideas. Over the past few years, we have renewed and accelerated our
actions and activities in support of DE&I. In 2021, we
appointed a Chief Diversity Officer (CDO), hired a Vice President
of DE&I and appointed an associate-led DE&I Council.
Together, these actions resulted in establishing a Diversity,
Equity and Inclusion Office, solidifying our focus on these
efforts. Additionally our eight Business Resource Groups, made up
of over 700 associate members, act as a catalyst for ensuring a
fully inclusive and engaging work environment.
Our DE&I strategy is embedded into our overall governance
process and business model, demonstrating our elevated commitment
and accountability to this imperative. The strategy describes what
we seek to accomplish and how we will measure progress across four
focus areas: (i) Workforce - creating pathways for hiring and
promotions that map to market availability; (ii) Workplace -
promoting an inclusive, engaged culture that empowers associates
through opportunities to grow, develop and lead; (iii) Marketplace
- infusing DE&I into our growth strategy, product delivery,
customer experience and supply chain; and (iv) Community – building
strategic partnerships that empower our communities and advance
business priorities.
As of
December 31, 2022,
approximately 67% of our total work force and 44% of our senior
leaders were female, while approximately 47% of our total work
force and 15% of our senior leaders were minorities.
ESG Strategy
We are committed to sustainability, including integrating ESG
principles into our business strategy in ways that optimize
opportunities to make positive impacts while advancing long-term
financial and reputational goals. As part of our business
transformation, in 2021, our Board approved an enhanced and
modernized ESG strategy intended to drive additional progress on
initiatives that promote sustainability, diversity, equity and
inclusion, and increased transparency in our disclosures. We
continue to advance the integration of ESG into our overall
governance and risk management practices.
Additional information regarding our ESG strategy and initiatives
can be found in our annual ESG reports, which are published on our
corporate website at:
https://investor.breadfinancial.com/sustainability/. No information
from this website is incorporated by reference herein. Please also
see “Human Capital” above.
Other Information
Our corporate headquarters are located at 3095 Loyalty Circle,
Columbus, Ohio 43219, where our telephone number is
614-729-4000.
We file or furnish annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy
statements and other information with the SEC. Our SEC filings are
available to the public at the SEC’s website at
www.sec.gov.
You may also obtain copies of our annual, quarterly and current
reports, proxy statements and certain other information filed or
furnished with the SEC, as well as amendments thereto, free of
charge from our website,
www.BreadFinancial.com.
No information from this website is incorporated by reference
herein. These documents are posted to our website as soon as
reasonably practicable after we have filed or furnished these
documents with the SEC. We post our Audit Committee, Risk
Committee, Compensation & Human Capital Committee and
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charters, our
corporate governance guidelines, and our code of ethics, code of
ethics for senior financial officers, and code of ethics for Board
members on our website. These documents are available free of
charge to any stockholder upon request.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
RISK FACTORS
This section should be carefully reviewed, in addition to the other
information appearing in this Form 10-K, including the sections
entitled “Risk Management” and “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our
consolidated financial statements and related notes, for important
information regarding risks and uncertainties that affect us. The
risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we
face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or
that we currently believe are not material, may also become
important factors that adversely affect our business.
If any of the following risks actually occur, our business,
financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects
could be materially and adversely affected.
Summary
This risk factor summary is qualified in its entirety by reference
to the complete description of our risk factors set forth
immediately below.
Risks related to our macroeconomic, global, strategic, business and
competitive environment include:
•Market
conditions, inflation, rising interest rates, unemployment levels
and the increased probability of a recession
or prolonged economic slowdown, and the related impact on consumer
spending behavior, payments, debt levels, savings rates and other
behavior, could have a material adverse effect on our
business.
•Global
political, market, public health and social events or conditions,
including the ongoing war in Ukraine and the continuing effects of
the COVID-19 pandemic, may harm our business.
•Our
unsecured loans make us reliant on the future credit performance of
our customers, and if customers are unable to repay our loans, our
level of future delinquency and write-off rates will
increase.
•A
significant percentage of our revenue is generated through
relationships with a limited number of partners, and a decrease in
business from, or the loss of, any of these partners, could have an
adverse effect on our business.
•Our
business is heavily concentrated in U.S. consumer credit, and
therefore our results are more susceptible to fluctuations in the
U.S. consumer credit market than a more diversified
company.
•The
amount of our Allowance for credit losses could adversely affect
our business and may be insufficient to cover actual losses on our
loans.
•We
may be unable to successfully identify, complete or successfully
integrate or disaggregate business acquisitions, divestitures and
other strategic initiatives, including failure to realize the
intended benefits of the spinoff of our former LoyaltyOne
segment.
•Competition
in our industry is intense.
•Our
results of operations and growth depend on our ability to retain
existing partners and attract new partners, and our results are
impacted, to a significant extent, on the active and effective
promotion and support of our products by our partners and on the
financial performance of our partners.
•We
rely extensively on models in managing many aspects of our
business, and if they are not accurate or are misinterpreted, such
factors could have a material adverse effect on our business and
results of operations.
•Underwriting
performance of acquired or new lending programs may not be
consistent with existing experience.
Risks related to our liquidity, market and credit risk
include:
•Adverse
financial market conditions or our inability to effectively manage
our funding and liquidity risk could have a material adverse effect
on our business, liquidity and ability to meet our debt service
requirements and other obligations.
•Our
inability to effectively access the securitization or other capital
markets could limit our funding opportunities for loans and other
business opportunities.
•Competition
for deposits and regulatory restrictions on deposit products can
impact availability and cost of funds.
•Our
level of indebtedness may restrict our ability to compete and grow
our business.
•Our
market valuation has been, and may continue to be, volatile, and
returns to stockholders may be limited.
•We
are a holding company and depend on dividends and other payments
from our Banks, which are subject to various legal and regulatory
restrictions.
Risks related to our legal, regulatory and compliance environment
include:
•We
face various risks related to the extensive government regulation
and supervision of our business, including by the FDIC, CFPB and
other federal and state authorities. These risks include pending
and future laws and
regulations that may adversely impact our business, such as the
CFPB’s recent proposed rulemaking with respect to late fees, as
well as supervisory and other actions that may be taken against us
by our regulators.
•Pending
and future litigation
could subject us to significant fines, penalties, judgments and/or
requirements.
•Regulations
relating to privacy, information security and data protection could
increase our costs, affect or limit how we collect and use personal
information and adversely affect our business
opportunities.
•Financial
institution capital requirements may limit cash available for
business operations, growth and returns to
stockholders.
Risks related to cybersecurity, technology and third-party vendors
include:
•We
rely on third-party vendors, and we could be adversely impacted if
such vendors fail to fulfill their obligations.
•Impacts
arising from or relating to the transition of our credit card
processing services to strategic outsourcing providers that we
completed in 2022 have, and may continue, to adversely affect our
business.
•Failures
in data protection, cybersecurity and information security, as well
as business interruptions to our data centers and other systems,
could critically impair our products, services and ability to
conduct business.
•Our
industry is subject to rapid and significant technological changes,
and we may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize new
or enhanced products and services.
Risks related to the spinoff of our former LoyaltyOne segment
include potential tax liability, disputes or other adverse
impacts.
Macroeconomic, Strategic, Business and Competitive
Risks
Weakness and instability in the macroeconomic environment could
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Macroeconomic conditions historically have affected our business,
results of operations and financial condition and will continue to
affect them in the future. We offer an array of payment, lending
and saving solutions to consumers, and a prolonged period of
economic weakness, including a recession or economic slowdown,
economic and market volatility, and other adverse economic
conditions, including inflation, increased interest rates and high
levels of unemployment, could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition, as these
macroeconomic conditions may reduce consumer confidence and
negatively impact customers’ payment and spending behavior. Some of
the specific risks we face as a result of these conditions include
the following:
•Adverse
impacts on our customers’ ability and willingness to pay amounts
owed to us, increasing delinquencies, defaults, bankruptcies,
charge-offs and Allowances for credit losses, and decreasing
recoveries;
•Decreased
consumer spending, changes in payment patterns, lower demand for
credit and shifts in consumer payment behavior towards avoiding
late fees, finance charges and other fees;
•Decreased
reliability of the process and models we use to estimate our
Allowance for credit losses, particularly if unexpected variations
in key inputs and assumptions cause actual losses to diverge from
the projections of our models and our estimates become increasingly
subject to management’s judgment; and
•Limitations
on our ability to replace maturing liabilities and to access the
capital markets to meet liquidity needs.
As an illustration of the potential impact of an economic downturn
on our business, our Delinquency and Net loss rates peaked in 2009
during the financial crisis at 6.2% and 10.0%, respectively. As of
December 31, 2022 our Delinquency rate was 5.5% and our
full-year Net loss rate was 5.4% for the year ended
December 31, 2022.
We continue to closely monitor economic conditions and indicators,
including inflation, interest rates, housing values, consumer
wages, consumer saving rates and debt levels, including student
loan debt, unemployment, concerns about the level of U.S.
government debt, as well as economic and political conditions in
the U.S. and global markets, but the outcome of any of these
conditions and indicators remains difficult to predict. During
2022, our Provision for credit losses increased relative to 2021
due to, in part, the economic scenario weightings in our credit
reserve modeling reflecting an increasing probability of a
recession, high inflation, and the increased cost of overall
consumer debt. A recession or prolonged period of economic weakness
would likely, among other things, adversely affect consumer
discretionary spending levels and the ability and willingness of
customers to pay amounts owed to us, and could have a material
adverse effect on our business, key credit trends, results of
operations and financial condition.
Global economic, political, market, health and social events or
conditions, including the war in Ukraine and the ongoing effects of
the COVID-19 pandemic, may harm our business.
Our revenues are largely dependent on the number and volume of
credit transactions by consumers, whose spending patterns may be
affected by economic, political, market, health and social events
or conditions. As described above, adverse macroeconomic conditions
within the U.S. or internationally, including but not limited to
recessions, inflation, rising interest rates, high unemployment,
currency fluctuations, actual or anticipated large-scale defaults
or failures, volatility in energy prices, a slowdown of global
trade, and reduced consumer and business spending, have a direct
impact on our loan volumes and revenues. Furthermore, in efforts to
deal with adverse macroeconomic conditions, governments may
introduce new or additional initiatives or requests to reduce or
eliminate late fees or other charges, which could result in
additional financial pressures on our business.
In addition, outbreaks of illnesses, pandemics like COVID-19, or
other local or global health issues, political uncertainties,
international hostilities, armed conflict, war (such as the ongoing
war in Ukraine), civil unrest, climate-related events, including
the increasing frequency of extreme weather events, impacts to the
power grid, and natural disasters have, to varying degrees,
negatively impacted our operations, brand partners, service
providers, activities, and consumer spending.
The ongoing effects of the COVID-19 pandemic remain difficult to
predict due to numerous uncertainties, including the
transmissibility, severity, duration and resurgence of the virus;
the emergence of new variants of the virus; the uptake and
effectiveness of health and safety measures or actions that are
voluntarily adopted by the public or required by governments or
public health authorities; the availability, effectiveness and
consumer acceptance of vaccines and treatments; the indirect impact
of the pandemic on global economic activity; the impact of the
reopening of borders and the resumption of international travel;
increased logistics costs; a continued competitive labor market;
and the impact of the global COVID-19 pandemic on our employees,
our operations, and the business of our brand partners and
suppliers.
The Russia-Ukraine conflict has had, and could continue to have,
significant negative effects on regional and global economic and
financial markets, including increased volatility, reduced
liquidity, supply chain concerns and overall uncertainty. Russia
may take additional counter measures or retaliatory actions
(including cyberattacks), which could exacerbate negative
consequences on global financial markets and stability. The
duration of ongoing hostilities and corresponding sanctions and
related events cannot be predicted.
A decline in economic, political, market, health and social
conditions could impact our brand partners as well, and their
decisions could reduce the number of cards, accounts, and credit
lines of their customers, which would ultimately impact our
revenues. Our brand partners may implement cost-reduction
initiatives that reduce or eliminate marketing budgets, and
decrease spending on optional or enhanced value added services from
us. Any events or conditions that impair the functioning of the
financial markets, tighten the credit market, or lead to a
downgrade of any present or future credit rating of ours could
increase our future borrowing costs and impair our ability to
access the capital and credit markets on favorable terms, which
could affect our liquidity and capital resources, or significantly
increase our cost of capital.
Finally, as governments, investors and other stakeholders face
additional pressures to accelerate actions to address climate
change and other environmental, social and governance topics,
governments are implementing regulations and investors and other
stakeholders, whether by stockholder proposals, public campaigns,
proxy solicitations or otherwise, are imposing new expectations on,
or focusing investments in ways that may cause significant shifts
in, disclosure, commerce and consumption behaviors.
Any of these developments may increase our operating costs and
otherwise negatively impact our business. In addition, our
inability to timely address these new and evolving requirements or
pressures may result in regulatory enforcement actions or
stockholder litigation, and otherwise damage our reputation. See
“-Damage
to our reputation could damage our business.”
The loans we make are unsecured, and we may not be able to
ultimately collect from customers that default on their
loans.
The primary risk associated with unsecured consumer lending is the
risk of default or bankruptcy of the borrower, resulting in the
borrower’s balance being written-off as uncollectible. We rely
principally on the borrower’s creditworthiness for repayment of the
loan and therefore have no other recourse for collection. We may
not be able to successfully identify and evaluate the
creditworthiness of borrowers to minimize delinquencies and losses.
The models and approaches we use to manage our credit risk,
including our automated proprietary scoring technology and
verification procedures for new account holders, establishing or
adjusting their credit limits and applying our risk-based pricing,
may not accurately predict future write-offs for various reasons
discussed elsewhere in these Risk Factors, including see
“Our
risk management
policies and procedures may not be effective, and the models we
rely on may not be accurate or may be
misinterpreted.”
below. While we monitor credit quality on a regular and consistent
basis, utilizing internal algorithms and external credit bureau
risk scores and other data, these algorithms and data sources may
be inaccurate or incomplete, including as a result of certain
customers’ credit profiles not fully reflecting their credit risk
due to the less-regulated reporting requirements for many fintechs.
An increase in defaults or net principal losses could result in a
reduction in Net income. General economic conditions, including a
recession or prolonged economic slowdown, inflation, rising
interest rates, high unemployment or volatility in energy prices,
may result in greater delinquencies that lead to greater credit
losses. In addition to being affected by general economic
conditions and the success of our collection and recovery efforts,
the stability of our Delinquency and Net loss rates are affected by
the credit risk inherent in our Credit card and other loans
portfolio, and the vintage of the accounts in our various credit
card portfolios. Further, our pricing strategy may not offset the
negative impact on profitability caused by increases in
delinquencies and losses, thus any material increases in
delinquencies and losses beyond our current estimates could have a
material adverse impact on us. For 2022, our Net principal loss
rate was 5.4%, compared with 4.6% and 6.6% for 2021 and 2020,
respectively. Our Delinquency rates were 5.5% of Credit card and
other loans as of December 31, 2022, compared with 3.9% and
4.4% as of December 31, 2021 and 2020,
respectively.
A significant percentage of our Total net interest and non-interest
income, or revenue, is generated through our
relationships with a limited number of partners, and a decrease in
business from, or the loss of, any of these partners could cause a
significant drop in our revenue.
We depend on a limited number of large partner relationships for a
significant portion of our revenue. As of and for the year ended
December 31, 2022, our five largest credit card programs accounted
for approximately 47% of our Total net interest and non-interest
income and 41% of our End-of-period credit card and other loans. In
particular, our programs with (alphabetically) Ulta Beauty and
Victoria’s Secret & Co. and its retail affiliates each
accounted for more than 10% of our Total net interest and
non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2022. A
decrease in business from, or the loss of, any of our significant
partners for any reason, could have a material adverse effect on
our business. We previously announced the non-renewal of our
contract with BJ’s Wholesale Club (BJ’s) and the sale of the BJ’s
portfolio, which closed in late February 2023.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, BJ’s branded co-brand
accounts generated approximately 10% of our Total net interest and
non-interest income. As of December 31, 2022, BJ’s branded
co-brand accounts were responsible for approximately 11% of our
Total credit card and other loans.
Our business is heavily concentrated in U.S. consumer credit, and
therefore our results are more susceptible to fluctuations in that
market than a more diversified company.
Our business is heavily concentrated in U.S. consumer credit. As a
result, we are more susceptible to fluctuations and risks
particular to U.S. consumer credit than a more diversified company.
For example, our business is particularly sensitive to
macroeconomic conditions that affect the U.S. economy, consumer
spending and consumer credit. We are also more susceptible to the
risks of increased regulations and legal and other regulatory
actions that are targeted at consumer credit or the specific
consumer credit products that we offer (including promotional
financing). Our business concentration could have an adverse effect
on our results of operations.
We expect growth to result, in part, from new and acquired credit
card and buy now, pay later (BNPL) programs whose credit card and
other loans performance could result in increased portfolio losses
and negatively impact our profitability.
We expect an important source of our growth to come from the
acquisition of existing credit card programs and initiating credit
card and BNPL programs with retailers and other merchants who
either do not currently offer a private label or co-brand credit
card or are initiating or transitioning from another BNPL platform.
We believe that our pricing and models for determining credit risk
are designed to effectively evaluate the credit risk of existing
programs and ascertain the credit risk that we are willing to
assume for acquired programs as well as those we initiate. We
cannot be assured that the loss experience on acquired and
initiated programs will be consistent with our more established
programs, or that the cost to provide service to these new programs
will not be higher than anticipated. The failure to successfully
underwrite these acquired and initiated credit card or BNPL
programs may result in defaults greater than our expectations and
could have a material adverse impact on us and our profitability.
See “Our
risk management policies and procedures may not be effective, and
the models we rely on may not be accurate or may be
misinterpreted.”.
Moreover, under the CECL accounting rules, the acquisition of an
existing credit card or BNPL portfolio typically has a negative
impact on certain key financial metrics in the near-term, including
net income and earnings per share, because we are required to
include a reserve build in our Provision for credit losses for the
estimated credit losses to be experienced over the life of the
acquired portfolio. The amount of this reserve build (which is
included in the reporting period in which the portfolio is
obtained) is
often large relative to the amount of revenue generated through
such date by the newly-acquired portfolio. See also
“–The
amount of our Allowance for credit losses could adversely affect
our business and may prove to be insufficient to cover actual
losses on our loans.”
below.
Our risk management policies and procedures may not be effective,
and the models we rely on may not be accurate or may be
misinterpreted.
Our risk management framework that seeks to identify and mitigate
current or future risks and appropriately balance risk and return
may not be comprehensive or fully effective. As regulations and
competition continue to evolve, our risk management framework may
not always keep sufficient pace with those changes. If our risk
management framework does not effectively identify or mitigate our
risks, we could suffer unexpected losses and could be materially
adversely affected.
We rely extensively on models in managing many aspects of our
business, including liquidity and capital planning (including
stress testing), customer selection, credit and other risk
management, pricing, reserving and collections management. The
models may prove in practice to be less predictive than we expect
for a variety of reasons, including as a result of errors in
constructing, interpreting or using the models or the use of
inaccurate assumptions (including, models being calibrated on
historical cycles and correlations which may not be predictive of
the future, or failures to update assumptions appropriately or in a
timely manner). Our assumptions may be inaccurate for many reasons
including that they often involve matters that are inherently
difficult to predict and beyond our control (e.g., macroeconomic
conditions, including
continued elevated inflation, low unemployment, increasing consumer
debt levels and weakening in macroeconomic indicators,
and their impact on partner and customer behaviors) and they often
involve complex interactions between a number of dependent and
independent variables, factors and other assumptions. The errors or
inaccuracies in our models may be material, and could lead us to
make poor or sub-optimal decisions in managing our business, and
this could have a material adverse effect on our business, results
of operations and financial condition.
Fraudulent activity associated with our products and services could
negatively impact our operating results, brand and reputation and
cause the use of our products and services to decrease and our
fraud losses to increase.
We are subject to the risk of fraudulent activity associated with
retailers, partners, other merchant parties or third-party service
providers handling consumer information. Our fraud-related
operational losses were $73 million, $71 million and
$141 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021
and 2020, respectively. Our products are susceptible to application
fraud, because among other things, we provide immediate access to
credit at the time of approval. In addition, digital sales on the
internet and through mobile channels are becoming a larger part of
our business and fraudulent activity is higher as a percentage of
sales in those channels than in stores. The different financial
products that we offer, including deposit products, are susceptible
to different types of fraud, and, depending on our product mix and
channel mix, we may continue to experience variations in, or levels
of, fraud-related expense that are different from or higher than
those experienced by some of our competitors or the industry
generally. The risk of fraud continues to increase for the
financial services industry, and credit card and deposit fraud,
identity theft and related crimes are likely to continue to be
prevalent, with increasingly sophisticated perpetrators. Our
resources, technologies and fraud prevention tools may be
insufficient to accurately detect and prevent fraud. High profile
fraudulent activity could also negatively impact our brand and
reputation, which could negatively impact the use of our services,
leading to a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
In addition, significant increases in fraudulent activity could
lead to regulatory intervention, including, but not limited to,
additional consumer notification requirements, increasing our costs
and negatively impacting our operating results, net income and
profitability.
The amount of our Allowance for credit losses could adversely
affect our business and may prove to be insufficient to cover
actual losses on our loans.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s CECL accounting standard
became effective for us on January 1, 2020 and requires us to
determine periodic estimates of the lifetime expected credit losses
on loans, and reserve for those expected credit losses through an
allowance for credit losses against the loans. In addition, as
mentioned above, for portfolios we may acquire when we enter into
new partner program agreements, we are required to establish at the
time of acquisition such an allowance. Any subsequent deterioration
in the performance of a purchased portfolio after acquisition
results in incremental credit loss reserves. Growth in our loan
portfolio generally would also lead to an increase in our Allowance
for credit losses.
The process for establishing an Allowance for credit losses is
critical to our results of operations and financial condition, and
requires complex models and judgments, including forecasts of
economic conditions. The ongoing impact of CECL will be
significantly influenced by the composition, characteristics and
quality of our Credit card and other loans, as well as the
prevailing economic conditions and forecasts utilized. For
additional information regarding the adoption of CECL and its
impact, see Note 3, “Allowance for Credit Losses” to our
Consolidated Financial Statements included as part of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
The CECL model may create more volatility in the level of our
Allowance for credit losses. If we are required (as a result of any
review, update, regulatory guidance or otherwise) to materially
increase our level of Allowance for credit losses, such increase
could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results
of operations and opportunity to pursue new business. Moreover, we
may underestimate our expected credit losses, and we cannot assure
that our credit loss reserves will be sufficient to cover actual
losses.
We may not be successful in realizing the benefits associated with
our acquisitions, dispositions and strategic investments, and our
business and reputation could be materially adversely
affected.
Historically, we have acquired a number of businesses, as well as
made strategic investments in businesses, products, technologies,
platforms or other ventures, and we expect to continue to evaluate
potential acquisitions, investments and other transactions in the
future. There is no assurance that we will be able to successfully
identify suitable candidates for any such opportunities, value any
such opportunities accurately, negotiate favorable terms for any
such opportunities, or successfully complete any such proposed
transactions. If we are unable to identify attractive acquisition
candidates or accretive new business opportunities, our growth
could be limited.
Similarly, we may evaluate the potential disposition of, or elect
to divest, assets or portfolios that no longer complement our
long-term strategic objectives, as we did in November 2021, when we
completed the spinoff of our LoyaltyOne segment. When a
determination is made to divest assets or portfolios, we may
encounter difficulty attaining buyers or effecting desired exit
strategies in a timely manner or on acceptable terms and may be
subject to market forces leading to a divestiture on less than
optimal price or other terms.
In addition, there are numerous risks associated with acquisitions,
dispositions and the implementation of new business opportunities,
including, but not limited to:
•the
difficulty and expense that we incur in connection with the
acquisition, disposition or new business opportunity;
•the
inability to satisfy pre-closing conditions preventing consummation
of the acquisition, disposition or new business
opportunity;
•the
potential for adverse consequences when conforming the acquired
company’s accounting policies to ours;
•the
diversion of management’s attention from other business
concerns;
•the
potential loss of customers or key employees of the acquired
company;
•the
impact on our financial condition due to the timing of the
acquisition, disposition or new business implementation or the
failure of the acquired or new business to meet operating
expectations;
•continued
financial responsibility with respect to a divested business,
including required equity ownership, guarantees, indemnities or
other financial obligations;
•the
assumption of unknown liabilities of the acquired
company;
•the
uncertainty of achieving expected benefits of an acquisition or
disposition, including revenue, human resources, technological or
other cost savings, operating efficiencies or
synergies;
•the
inability to integrate systems, personnel or technologies from our
acquisitions and strategic investments;
•unforeseen
legal, regulatory or other challenges that we may not be able to
manage effectively;
•the
reduction of cash available for operations, stock repurchase
programs or other uses and potentially dilutive issuances of equity
securities or incurrence of additional debt;
•the
requirement to provide transition services in connection with a
disposition resulting in the diversion of resources and focus;
and
•the
difficulty retaining and motivating key personnel from acquisitions
or in connection with dispositions.
For example, upon the disposition of Epsilon in July 2019, we
agreed to indemnify Publicis Groupe S.A. for the matter included in
Note 15, “Commitments and Contingencies” to the Consolidated
Financial Statements, which has resulted in a $150.0 million charge
associated with Epsilon’s deferred prosecution agreement with the
United States Department of Justice requiring two $75.0 million
payments in January 2021 and January 2022, respectively. In
connection with the spinoff of our former LoyaltyOne segment into a
standalone company, LVI, we retained a 19% ownership stake in
LVI.
During 2022, LVI’s stock price decreased significantly, and, as a
result, we wrote down the value of our 19% shareholding in LVI from
$50 million as of December 31, 2021 to $6 million as
of
December 31, 2022,
and there can be no assurance that we will not experience further
write-downs or other adverse impacts going forward. See
“Risks
Related to the LoyaltyOne Spinoff.”
below.
Furthermore, if the operations of an acquired or new business do
not meet expectations, our profitability may decline and we may
seek to restructure the acquired business or to impair the value of
some or all of the assets of the acquired or new
business.
The markets for the services that we offer may contract or fail to
expand and competition in our industry is intense, each of which
could negatively impact our growth and profitability.
The markets for our products and services are highly competitive,
and we expect this competition to intensify. Our growth and
continued profitability depend on continued acceptance or adoption
of the products and services we offer. We compete with a wide range
of businesses, and some of our current competitors have longer
operating histories, stronger brand names and greater financial,
technical, marketing and other resources than we do. Moreover, the
consumer credit and payments industry is highly competitive and we
face an increasingly dynamic industry as emerging technologies
enter the marketplace. For a more detailed discussion regarding the
manner in which we compete with respect to each of our product
categories, see “Item 1. Business—Competition” of this Form 10-K
above. Additionally, downturns in the economy or the performance of
our retail or other partners, including as a result of
macroeconomic conditions, geopolitical events or global health
events such as the COVID-19 pandemic, may result in a decrease in
the demand for our products and services. Our ability to generate
significant revenue from partners and consumers will depend on our
ability to differentiate ourselves through the products and
services we provide and the attractiveness of our programs to
consumers. If we are not able to differentiate our products and
services from those of our competitors, drive value for our
partners and their customers, or effectively and efficiently align
our resources with our goals and objectives, we may not be able to
compete effectively in the market. Any decrease in the demand for
our products and services for the reasons discussed above or any
other reasons could have a material adverse effect on our growth,
revenue and operating results.
Our results of operations and growth depend on our ability to
retain existing partners and attract new partners.
Following the disposition of our Epsilon business and the spinoff
of our LoyaltyOne segment, the majority of our revenue is generated
from the credit products we provide to customers of our partners
pursuant to program agreements that we enter into with our
partners. As a result, our results of operations and growth depend
on our ability to retain existing partners and attract new
partners. Historically, there has been turnover in our partners,
and we expect this will continue in the future. See also,
“A
significant percentage of our Total net interest and non-interest
income, or revenue, is generated through our relationships with a
limited number of partners, and a decrease in business from, or the
loss of, any of these partners could cause a significant drop in
our revenue.”.
Credit card program agreements with our brand partners typically
are for multi-year terms. These program agreements generally
provide each party with certain early termination rights, i.e.,
events or circumstances that would permit the party to terminate
the agreement prior to its scheduled termination date in accordance
with the conditions specified in the applicable agreement. For
example, in some cases, a brand partner may have the right to
terminate if we fail to meet certain service levels as set forth in
the applicable brand partner agreement. Generally, a brand partner
would not have the right to terminate until providing us formal
notice and an opportunity to cure the service level failure. As a
result of the transition of our credit card processing services to
our strategic outsourcing providers in late June 2022, we failed to
meet certain service levels in a number of our credit card program
agreements due to periods of unavailability of our customer support
and account servicing functions, which could, in certain
circumstances, have given rise to a termination right by an
impacted brand partner. To date, no brand partner has sought to
exercise any such termination right, and many other such rights
have either been formally waived or lapsed pursuant to the terms of
the applicable brand partner agreement.
We cannot provide assurance that a brand partner from which we did
not receive such a waiver will not attempt to terminate its program
agreement or that future service level failures will not
occur.
There is significant competition for our existing partners, and our
failure to retain our existing larger partner relationships upon
the expiration of a contractual arrangement or our earlier loss of
a relationship upon the exercise of a partner’s early termination
rights, or the expiration or termination of a substantial number of
smaller partner contracts or relationships, could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations (including growth
rates) and financial condition to the extent we do not acquire new
partners of similar size and profitability or otherwise grow our
business. In addition, existing relationships may be renewed with
less favorable terms to us in response to increased competition for
such relationships.
The competition for new partners is also significant, and our
failure to attract new partners could adversely affect our ability
to grow.
Our results depend, to a significant extent, on the active and
effective promotion and support of our products by our brand
partners.
Our partners generally accept most major credit cards and various
other forms of payment; therefore our success depends, in part, on
their active and effective promotion of our products to their
customers. We depend on our partners to integrate the use of our
credit products into their operations, including into their
in-store and online shopping experiences and loyalty programs. We
rely on our partners to train their sales and call center
associates about our products and to have their associates
encourage customers to apply for, and use, our products and
otherwise effectively market our products. If our partners do not
effectively promote and support our products, or if they make
changes in their business models that negatively impact card usage,
these actions could have a material adverse effect on our business
and results of operations. Partners may also implement or fail to
implement changes in their systems and technologies that may
disrupt the integration between their systems and technologies and
ours, any of which could disrupt the use of our products. In
addition, if our partners engage in improper business practices, do
not adhere to the terms of our program agreements or other
contractual arrangements or standards, or otherwise diminish the
value of our brand, we may suffer reputational damage and customers
may be less likely to use our products, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business and results of
operations.
Our results are impacted, to a significant extent, by the financial
performance of our partners.
Our ability to originate new credit card accounts, generate new
loans, and earn interest and fees and other income is dependent, in
part, upon sales of merchandise and services by our partners. The
retail and other industries in which our partners operate are
intensely competitive. Our partners’ sales may decrease or may not
increase as we anticipate for various reasons, some of which are in
the partners’ control and some of which are not. For example,
partner sales have been, and in the future may be adversely
affected by the COVID-19 pandemic or other macroeconomic conditions
having a national, regional or more local effect on consumer
spending, business conditions affecting the general retail
environment, such as supply chain distributions or the ability to
maintain sufficient staffing levels, or a particular partner or
industry, or natural disasters or other catastrophes affecting
broad or more discrete geographic areas. If our partners’ sales
decline for any reason, it generally results in lower credit sales,
and therefore lower loan volume and associated interest and fees
and other income for us from our customers. In addition, if a
partner closes some or all of its stores or becomes subject to a
voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy proceeding (or if there is a
perception that such an event may occur), its customers who have
used our financing products may have less incentive to pay their
outstanding balances to us, which could result in higher charge-off
rates than anticipated and our costs for servicing its customers’
accounts may increase. This risk is particularly acute with respect
to our largest partners that account for a significant amount of
our interest and fees on loans. See “A
significant percentage of our Total net interest and non-interest
income, or revenue, is generated through our relationships with a
limited number of partners, and a decrease in business from, or the
loss of, any of these partners could cause a significant drop in
our revenue.”.
Moreover, if the financial condition of a partner deteriorates
significantly or a partner becomes subject to a bankruptcy
proceeding, we may not be able to recover customer returns,
customer payments made in partner stores or other amounts due to us
from the partner. A decrease in sales by our partners for any
reason or a bankruptcy proceeding involving any of them could have
a material adverse impact on our business and results of
operations.
We may not be successful in our efforts to promote usage of our
proprietary cards, or to effectively control the costs associated
with such promotion, both of which may materially impact our
profitability.
We have been investing in promoting the usage of our proprietary
cards,
including our Bread CashbackTM
American Express®
Credit Card that we launched in 2022,
but there can be no assurance that our investments to acquire
cardholders, provide differentiated features and services and
increase usage of our proprietary cards will be effective,
particularly with increasing competition from other card issuers
and fintechs, as well as changing consumer and business behaviors.
In addition, if we develop new products or offers that attract
customers looking for short-term incentives rather than
incentivizing long-term loyalty, cardholder attrition and costs
could increase. Moreover, we may not be able to cost-effectively
manage and expand cardholder benefits, including controlling the
growth of marketing, promotion, rewards and cardholder services
expenses in the future.
Reductions in interchange fees may reduce the competitive
advantages our private label credit card products currently have by
virtue of not charging interchange fees and would reduce our income
earned from those fees on co-brand and general purpose credit card
transactions.
Interchange is a fee merchants pay to the interchange network in
exchange for the use of the network’s infrastructure and payment
facilitation, and which are paid to credit card issuers to
compensate them for the risk they bear in lending money to
customers. We earn interchange fees on co-brand and general purpose
credit card transactions, but we typically do not charge or earn
interchange fees from our partners or customers on our private
label credit card products.
Merchants, trying to decrease their operating expenses, have sought
to, and have had some success at, lowering interchange rates.
Several recent events and actions indicate a continuing increase in
focus on interchange by both regulators and merchants. In 2022, for
example, legislation was introduced in the U.S. House of
Representatives and Senate, which, among other things, would
require large issuing banks to offer a choice of at least two
unaffiliated networks over which electronic transactions may be
processed. Furthermore, beyond pursuing litigation, legislation and
regulation, merchants are also pursuing alternate payment platforms
as a means to lower payment processing costs. To the extent
interchange fees are reduced, one of our current competitive
advantages with our partners—that
we typically do not charge interchange fees when our private label
credit card products are used to purchase our partners’ goods and
services—may
be reduced. Moreover, to the extent interchange fees are reduced,
our income from those fees will be lower on co-brand and general
purpose credit card transactions. As a result, a reduction in
interchange fees could have a material adverse effect on our
business and results of operations. In addition, for our co-brand
and general purpose credit cards, we are subject to the operating
regulations and procedures set forth by the interchange network,
and our failure to comply with these operating regulations, which
may change from time to time, could subject us to various penalties
or fees, or the termination of our license to use the interchange
network, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our
business and results of operations
We may not be able to retain and/or attract and hire a highly
qualified and diverse workforce or maintain our corporate culture,
and having a large segment of our workforce working from home may
exacerbate these risks and cause new risks.
Our performance largely depends on the talents and efforts of our
employees, particularly our key personnel and senior management. We
may be unable to retain or to attract highly qualified employees.
The market for key personnel is highly competitive, particularly in
technology and other skill areas significant to our business.
Failure to attract, hire, develop, motivate and retain highly
qualified and diverse employee talent, or to maintain a corporate
culture that fosters innovation, creativity and teamwork could harm
our overall business and results of operations. We rely on key
personnel to lead with integrity and decency. To the extent our
leaders behave in a manner that is not consistent with our values,
we could experience significant impact to our brand and reputation,
as well as to our corporate culture.
Moreover, in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, we transitioned
nearly all of our workforce to work remotely, and a significant
portion of our workforce continues to work in a mostly remote
environment. Remote work by a majority of our employee population
may impact our culture, and employee engagement with our company,
which could affect productivity and our ability to retain employees
who are critical to our operations and may increase our costs and
impact our financial results of operations. In addition, an
increase in work from home by other companies may create more job
opportunities for employees and make it more difficult for us to
attract and retain key talent, especially in light of changing
worker expectations and talent marketplace variability regarding
flexible work models.
In addition, employees who work from home rely on residential
communication networks and internet providers that may not be as
resilient as commercial networks and providers and may be more
susceptible to service interruptions and cyberattacks than
commercial systems. Our business continuity and disaster recovery
plans, which have been historically developed and tested with a
focus on centralized delivery locations, may not work as
effectively in a distributed work from home model, where weather
impacts, network and power grid downtime may be difficult to
manage. In addition, we may not be effective in timely updating our
existing operating and administrative controls nor implementing new
controls tailored to the work from home environment. If we are
unable to manage the work from home environment effectively to
address these and other risks, our reputation and results of
operations may be impacted.
Damage to our reputation could damage our business.
In recent years, financial services companies have experienced
increased reputational risk as consumers protest and regulators
scrutinize business and compliance practices of such companies.
Maintaining a positive reputation is critical to attracting and
retaining partners, customers, investors and employees. Damage to
our reputation can therefore cause
significant harm to our business and prospects. Harm to our
reputation can arise from numerous sources, including, among
others, employee misconduct; a breach of our, or our service
providers’ cybersecurity defenses; service outages, such as those
many of our customers experienced in 2022 in connection with the
transition of our credit card processing services to strategic
outsourcing providers, or otherwise; litigation or regulatory
outcomes; stockholder activism; failing to deliver minimum
standards of service and quality; compliance failures; the use of
our, or our partners’ products to facilitate legal, but
controversial, products and services, including adult content,
cryptocurrencies, firearms and gambling activity; and the
activities of customers, business partners and counterparties.
Social media also can cause harm to our reputation. By its very
nature, social media can reach a wide audience in a very short
amount of time, which presents unique challenges for corporate
communications. Negative or otherwise undesirable publicity
generated through unexpected social media coverage can damage our
reputation and brand. Negative publicity regarding us, whether or
not true, may result in customer attrition and other harm to our
business prospects. There has also been increased focus on topics
related to environmental, social and governance policies, and
criticism of our policies in these areas could also harm our
reputation and/or potentially limit our access to some forms of
capital or liquidity.
Liquidity, Market and Credit Risks
Adverse financial market conditions or our inability to effectively
manage our funding and liquidity risk could have a material adverse
effect on our business, liquidity and ability to meet our debt
service requirements and other obligations.
We need to effectively manage our funding and liquidity in order to
meet our cash requirements such as day-to-day operating expenses,
extensions of credit to our customers, investments to grow our
business, payments of principal and interest on our borrowings and
payments on our other obligations. Our primary sources of funding
and liquidity are collections from our customers, deposits, funds
from securitized financings and proceeds from unsecured borrowings,
including our credit facility and outstanding senior notes. If we
do not have sufficient liquidity, we may not be able to meet our
debt service requirements and other obligations, particularly
during a liquidity stress event. If we maintain or are required to
maintain too much liquidity, it could be costly and reduce our
financial flexibility.
We will need additional financing in the future to repay or
refinance our existing debt at maturity or otherwise and to fund
our growth. As of
December 31, 2022,
we had $556 million of terms loans outstanding under our
parent credit agreement, which matures in July 2024, as well as
$850 million of 4.750% senior notes due in December 2024 and $500
million of 7.000% senior notes due in January 2026.
The availability of additional financing will depend on a variety
of factors such as financial market conditions generally, including
the availability of credit to the financial services industry and
our lender counterparties’ willingness to lend to us, consumers’
willingness to place money on deposit with us, our performance and
credit ratings and the performance of our securitized portfolios.
Disruptions, uncertainty or volatility in the capital, credit or
deposit markets, such as the uncertainty and volatility experienced
in the capital and credit markets during recessions and periods of
financial stress, inflation, rising interest rates, high levels of
unemployment, other economic and political conditions in the global
markets and concern over the level of U.S. government debt and
fiscal measures that may be taken over the longer term to address
these matters, may limit our ability to obtain additional financing
or refinance maturing liabilities on desired terms (including
funding costs) in a timely manner, or at all. As a result, we may
be forced to delay obtaining funding or be forced to issue or raise
funding on undesirable terms, which could significantly reduce our
financial flexibility and cause us to contract or not grow our
business, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition.
Given the current rising interest rate environment and other
recessionary pressures, the debt markets are volatile, and there
can be no assurance that significant disruptions, uncertainties and
volatility will not occur in the future.
Specifically, availability of capital from the non-investment grade
debt markets is currently subject to significant volatility, and
there can be no assurance that we will be able to access those
markets at attractive rates, or at all. Given the maturities of our
current outstanding debt and the current macroeconomic conditions,
it is possible that we will be required to repay or refinance some
or all of our maturing debt in volatile and/or unfavorable markets.
If we are unable to continue to fund our business operations,
access capital markets for debt refinancings and otherwise, and
attract deposits on favorable terms and in a timely manner, or if
we experience an increase in our borrowing costs or otherwise fail
to manage our liquidity effectively, our results of operations and
financial condition may be materially adversely
affected.
If we are unable to securitize our credit card loans due to changes
in the market or other circumstances or events, we may not be able
to fund new credit card loans, which would have a material adverse
effect on our operations and profitability.
A significant source of funding is our securitization of credit
card loans, which involves the transfer of credit card loans to a
trust, and the issuance by the trust of notes to third-party
investors collateralized by the beneficial interest in the
transferred credit card loans. A number of factors affect our
ability to fund our credit card loans in the securitization market,
some of which are beyond our control, including:
•conditions
in the securities markets in general and the asset-backed
securitization market in particular;
•availability
of loans for securitization;
•conformity
in the quality of our credit card loans to rating agency
requirements and changes in that quality or those
requirements;
•costs
of securitizing our credit card loans;
•ability
to fund required over-collateralization or credit enhancements,
which are routinely utilized in order to achieve better credit
ratings to lower borrowing cost; and
•the
legal, regulatory, accounting or tax rules affecting securitization
transactions and asset-backed securities, generally.
Moreover, as a result of Basel III, which refers generally to a set
of regulatory reforms adopted in the U.S. and internationally that
are meant to address issues that arose in the banking sector during
the 2008-2010 financial crisis, banks have become subject to more
stringent capital, liquidity and leverage requirements. In response
to Basel III, certain lenders of private placement commitments
within our securitization trusts have sought and obtained
amendments to their respective transaction documents permitting
them to delay disbursement of funding increases by up to 35 days.
Although funding may be requested from other lenders who have not
delayed their funding, access to financing could be disrupted if
all of the lenders implement such delays or if the lending
capacities of those who did not do so were insufficient to make up
the shortfall. In addition, excess spread may be affected if the
issuing entity’s borrowing costs increase as a result of Basel III.
Such cost increases may result, for example, because the investors
are entitled to indemnification for increased costs resulting from
such regulatory changes.
The inability to securitize credit card loans due to changes in the
market, regulatory proposals, the unavailability of credit
enhancements, or any other circumstance or event would have a
material adverse effect on our operations, cost of funds and
overall financial condition.
The occurrence of events that result in the early amortization of
our existing credit card securitization transactions or an
inability to delay the accumulation of principal collections for
our existing credit card securitization transactions would
materially adversely affect our liquidity.
Our liquidity and cost of funds would be materially adversely
affected by the occurrence of events that could result in the early
amortization of our existing credit card securitization
transactions. Early amortization events may occur as a result of
certain adverse events specified for each asset-backed
securitization transaction, including, among others, deteriorating
asset performance or material servicing defaults. In addition,
certain series of funding securities issued by our securitization
trusts are subject to early amortization based on triggers relating
to the bankruptcy of one or more retailers or other partners.
Deteriorating economic conditions and increased competition in the
retail industry, among other factors, may lead to an increase in
bankruptcies among retailers who have entered into credit card
programs with us. The bankruptcy of one or more retailers or other
partners could lead to a decline in the amount of new loans and
could lead to increased delinquencies and defaults on the
associated loans. Any of these effects of a partner bankruptcy
could result in the commencement of an early amortization for one
or more series of such funding securities, particularly if such an
event were to occur with respect to a retailer or other partner
relating to a large percentage of such securitization trust’s
assets. The occurrence of an early amortization event may
significantly limit our ability to securitize additional loans and
materially adversely affect our liquidity.
Lower payment rates on our securitized credit card loans could
materially adversely affect our liquidity and financial
condition.
Certain collections from our securitized credit card loans come
back to us through our subsidiaries, and we use these collections
to fund our purchase of newly originated loans to collateralize our
securitized financings. If payment rates on our securitized credit
card loans are lower than they have historically been, fewer
collections will be remitted to us on an ongoing basis. Further,
certain series of our asset-backed securities include a requirement
that we accumulate principal
collections in a restricted account for a specified number of
months prior to the applicable security’s maturity date. We are
required under the program documents to lengthen this accumulation
period to the extent we expect the payment rates to be low enough
that the current length of the accumulation period is inadequate to
fully fund the restricted account by the applicable security’s
maturity date. Lower payment rates, and in particular payment rates
that are low enough that we are required to lengthen our
accumulation periods, could materially adversely affect our
liquidity and financial condition.
Inability to grow or maintain our deposit levels in the future
could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, ability to
grow our business and profitability.
A significant source of our funds is customer deposits, primarily
in the form of certificates of deposit and other savings products.
We obtain deposits directly from retail and commercial customers or
through brokerage firms that offer our deposit products to their
customers. In recent years, deposits have become an increasingly
important source of funds for us, with, for example, our retail
deposits growing 72% from $3.2 billion as of December 31,
2021 to $5.5 billion as of December 31, 2022, accounting
for 26% of our funding base. Our funding strategy includes
continued growth of our liquidity through deposits. The deposit
business continues to experience intense competition in attracting
and retaining deposits. We compete on the basis of the rates we pay
on deposits, the quality of our customer service and the
competitiveness of our digital banking capabilities. Our ability to
attract and maintain retail deposits remains highly dependent on
the products we offer, the strength of our Banks, the reputability
of our business practices and our financial health. Adverse
perceptions regarding our lending practices, regulatory compliance,
protection of customer information or sales and marketing
practices, or actions taken by regulators or others with respect to
our Banks, could impede our competitive position in the deposits
market.
The demand for the deposit products we offer may also be reduced
due to a variety of factors, including macroeconomic events,
changes in interest rates, changes in consumers’ preferences,
demographics or discretionary income, regulatory actions that
decrease consumer access to particular products or the development
or availability of competing products. Competition from other
financial services firms and others that use deposit funding
products may affect deposit renewal rates, costs or availability.
Conversely, any adjustments we make to the rates offered on our
deposit products to remain competitive may adversely affect our
liquidity or our profitability.
The FDIA prohibits an insured bank from offering interest rates on
any deposits that significantly exceed rates in its prevailing
market, unless it is “well capitalized”. A bank that is less than
“well capitalized” may not pay an interest rate on any deposit in
excess of 75 basis points over certain prevailing market rates.
There are no such restrictions under the FDIA on a bank that is
“well capitalized” and as of December 31, 2022, each of our
Banks met or exceeded all applicable requirements to be deemed
“well capitalized” for purposes of the FDIA. However, there can be
no assurance that our Banks will continue to meet those
requirements. Any limitation on the interest rates our Banks can
pay on deposits may competitively disadvantage us in attracting and
retaining deposits, resulting in a material adverse effect on our
business.
The FDIA also prohibits an insured bank from accepting brokered
deposits, unless it is “well capitalized” or it is “adequately
capitalized” and receives a waiver from the FDIC. Limitations on
our Banks’ ability to accept brokered deposits for any reason
(including regulatory limitations on the amount of brokered
deposits in total or as a percentage of total assets) in the future
could materially adversely impact our liquidity, funding costs and
profitability. In December 2020, the FDIC updated its regulations
that implement Section 29 of the FDIA to establish a new framework
for analyzing whether certain deposit arrangements qualify as
brokered deposits. This brokered deposit rule establishes
bright-line standards for determining whether an entity meets the
statutory definition of “deposit broker” and a consistent process
for application of the primary purpose exception. All deposits on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets of our Banks categorized as
non-brokered in accordance with the updated regulations mentioned
above comply with all application requirements of those
regulations. Any limitation on the ability of our Banks to
participate in the gathering of brokered deposits may competitively
disadvantage us in meeting our funding goals and result in a
material adverse effect on our business.
As of
December 31, 2022,
we had $13.8 billion in deposits, with approximately $6.7 billion
in non-maturity savings deposits and approximately $7.1 billion in
certificates of deposit. If, for whatever reason, we are unable to
grow or maintain our deposit levels, our liquidity, ability to grow
our business and profitability could be materially adversely
affected.
Our level of indebtedness could materially adversely affect our
ability to generate sufficient cash to repay our outstanding debt,
and our ability to react to changes in our business and our
incurrence of additional indebtedness to fund future needs could
exacerbate these risks.
Our level of indebtedness requires a high level of interest and
principal payments. Subject to the limits contained in our credit
agreement, the indentures governing our senior notes and our other
debt instruments, we may be able to incur substantial additional
indebtedness from time-to-time to finance working capital, capital
expenditures, investments or acquisitions, or for other purposes.
If we do so, the risks related to our level of indebtedness could
intensify. Our level of indebtedness increases the possibility that
we may be unable to generate cash sufficient to pay, when due, the
principal of, interest on or other amounts due in respect of our
indebtedness. Our level of indebtedness, combined with our other
financial obligations and contractual commitments,
could:
•make
it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to
our indebtedness, and any failure to comply with the obligations
under any of our debt instruments, including restrictive covenants,
could result in an event of default under our credit agreement, the
indentures governing our senior notes and the agreements governing
our other indebtedness;
•require
us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from
operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing funds
available for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions
or other new business and other corporate purposes;
•increase
our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions,
which could place us at a competitive disadvantage or require us to
dispose of assets to raise funds if needed for working capital or
to pay, when due, the principal of, interest on or other amounts
due in respect of our indebtedness;
•limit
our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our
business and the industries in which we and our brand partners
operate;
•limit
our ability to borrow additional funds, or to dispose of assets to
raise funds, if needed, for working capital, capital expenditures,
acquisitions or other new business and other corporate
purposes;
•delay
or abandon investments and capital expenditures;
•cause
any refinancing of our indebtedness to be at higher interest rates
and require us to comply with more onerous covenants, which could
further restrict our business operations; and
•prevent
us from raising the funds necessary to repurchase all senior notes
tendered to us upon the occurrence of certain changes of
control.
Restrictions imposed by the indentures governing our senior notes,
our credit agreement and our other outstanding or future
indebtedness may limit our ability to operate our business and to
finance our future operations or capital needs or to engage in
other business activities.
The terms of the indentures governing our senior notes, our credit
agreement and agreements governing our other debt instruments limit
us and our subsidiaries from engaging in specified types of
transactions. These covenants limit our and our subsidiaries’
ability, among other things, to:
•incur
additional debt;
•declare
or pay dividends, redeem stock or make other distributions to
stockholders;
•make
investments;
•create
liens or use assets as security in other transactions;
•merge
or consolidate, or sell, transfer, lease or dispose of
substantially all of our assets;
•enter
into transactions with affiliates;
•sell
or transfer certain assets; and
•enter
into any consensual encumbrance or restriction on the ability of
certain of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or make loans or sell
assets to us.
As a result of these covenants and restrictions, we may be limited
in how we conduct our business and we may be unable to raise
additional indebtedness to compete effectively or to take advantage
of new business opportunities. The terms of any future indebtedness
we may incur could include more restrictive covenants. We cannot
assure that we will be able to maintain compliance with these
covenants in the future. If we fail to comply with such covenants,
we may not be able to obtain waivers of non-compliance from the
lenders and/or amend the covenants so that we are in compliance
therewith.
Changes in market interest rates could negatively affect our
profitability.
Changes in market interest rates cause our finance charges, net and
our interest expense, net to increase or decrease, as certain of
our assets and liabilities carry interest rates that fluctuate with
market benchmarks. We fund credit card and other
loans with a combination of fixed rate and floating rate funding
sources that include deposits and securitized financings. We also
have unsecured term debt that is subject to variable interest
rates, and we may in the future incur additional debt or issue
preferred equity that rely on variable interest rates. Beginning in
March 2022, the Federal Reserve Board began raising the federal
funds rate in an effort to curb inflation, and we expect further
interest rate increases by the Federal Reserve in
2023.
The interest rate benchmark for most of our floating rate assets is
the Prime rate, and the interest rate benchmark for our floating
rate liabilities is generally either the
Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR)
or the Federal funds rate. The Prime rate and SOFR or the Federal
funds rate could reset at different times or could diverge, leading
to mismatches in the interest rates on our floating rate assets and
floating rate liabilities. Interest rates are highly sensitive to
many factors that are beyond our control, including general
economic conditions, the competitive environment within our
markets, consumer preferences for specific loan and deposit
products, and policies of various governmental and regulatory
agencies, in particular the Federal Reserve. Changes in monetary
policy, including changes in interest rate controls being applied
by the Federal Reserve, could influence the amount of interest we
receive on our Credit card and other loans and the amount of
interest we pay on deposits and borrowings. Further, we have only
recently begun indexing our variable rate debt to SOFR as a result
of the discontinuation of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR)
beginning in 2021. SOFR is a relatively new reference rate, has a
very limited history and is based on short-term repurchase
agreements, backed by Treasury securities. Changes in SOFR can be
volatile and difficult to predict, and there can be no assurance
that SOFR will perform similarly to the way LIBOR would have
performed at any time. As a result, the amount of interest we may
pay on our credit facilities is difficult to predict.
If the interest we pay on deposits and other borrowings increases
at a faster rate than the interest we receive on our Credit card
and other loans, our profitability would be adversely affected.
Conversely, our profitability could also be adversely affected if
the interest we receive on our Credit card and other loans falls
more quickly than the interest we pay on deposits and other
borrowings.
While the interest rate increases to date have resulted in a
nominal benefit on our results, there can be no assurance that
future rate increases will not impact us negatively. We recognize
that a customers’ ability and willingness to repay us can be
negatively impacted by factors such as inflation, which may result
in greater delinquencies that lead to greater credit losses, as
reflected in our increased Allowance for credit losses. If the
efforts to control inflation in the U.S. and globally are not
successful and inflationary pressures persist, they could magnify
the slowdown in the domestic and global economies and increase the
risk of a recession or prolonged economic slowdown, which may
adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Future sales of our common stock, or the perception that future
sales could occur, may adversely affect our common stock
price.
As of February 22, 2023, we had an aggregate of 144,986,708
shares of our common stock authorized but unissued and not reserved
for specific purposes. In general, we may issue all of these shares
without any action or approval by our stockholders. We have
reserved 5,329,044 shares of our common stock for issuance under
our employee stock purchase plan and our long-term incentive plans,
of which 672,776 shares have been issued and 1,927,320 shares are
issuable upon vesting of restricted stock awards and restricted
stock units. We have reserved for issuance 1,500,000 shares of our
common stock, 241,603 of which remain issuable, under our 401(k)
and Retirement Savings Plan as of December 31, 2022. In
addition, we may issue shares of our common stock in connection
with acquisitions. Sales or issuances of a substantial number of
shares of common stock, or the perception that such transactions
could occur, could adversely affect prevailing market prices of our
common stock, and any sale or issuance of our common stock will
dilute the ownership interests of existing
stockholders.
The market price and trading volume of our common stock may be
volatile and our stock price could decline.
The trading price of shares of our common stock has from time to
time fluctuated widely and in the future may be subject to similar
fluctuations. The trading price of our common stock may be affected
by a number of factors, including our operating results, changes in
our earnings estimates, additions or departures of key personnel,
our financial condition, legislative and regulatory changes,
general conditions in the industries in which we and our brand
partners operate, general economic conditions, and general
conditions in the securities markets.
Other risks described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K could also
materially adversely affect our share price.
There is no guarantee that we will pay future dividends or
repurchase shares at a level anticipated by stockholders, which
could reduce returns to our stockholders. Decisions to declare
future dividends on, or repurchase, our common stock will be at the
discretion of our Board of Directors based upon a review of
relevant considerations.
Since October 2016, our Board of Directors has declared quarterly
cash dividend payments on our outstanding common stock. Future
declarations of quarterly dividends and the establishment of future
record and payment dates are subject to approval by our Board of
Directors. The Board’s determination to declare dividends on, or
repurchase shares of, our common stock will depend upon our
profitability and financial condition, contractual restrictions,
restrictions imposed by applicable laws and regulations, including
those governing our Banks’ ability to pay dividends and make
distributions or other payments to us, and other factors that the
Board of Directors deems relevant. For example, beginning with the
second quarter of 2020, our Board of Directors reduced our
quarterly dividend payment by 67% from $0.63 to $0.21 per quarter.
Based on an evaluation of these factors, the Board of Directors may
determine in the future not to declare dividends at all, to declare
dividends at a reduced amount, not to repurchase shares or to
repurchase shares at reduced levels compared to historical levels,
any or all of which could reduce returns to our
stockholders.
We are a holding company and depend on payments from our
subsidiaries.
Bread Financial Holdings, Inc., our parent holding company, depends
on dividends, distributions and other payments from subsidiaries,
particularly our Banks, to fund dividend payments, any potential
share repurchases, payment obligations, including debt obligations,
and to provide funding and capital, as needed, to our other
operating subsidiaries. Banking laws and regulations and our
banking regulators may limit or prohibit our transfer of funds
freely, either to or from our subsidiaries, at any time. These
laws, regulations and rules may hinder our ability to access funds
that we may need to make payments on our obligations or otherwise
achieve strategic objectives. For more information, see “Business —
Supervision and Regulation”.
In preparing our financial statements we make certain assumptions,
judgments and estimates that affect amounts reported in our
consolidated financial statements, which, if not accurate, may
significantly impact our financial results.
We make assumptions, judgments and estimates in determining the
allowance for credit losses, accruals for employee-related
liabilities, accruals for uncertain tax positions, valuation
allowances on deferred tax assets and legal contingencies. We also
make assumptions, judgments and estimates for items such as the
fair value of financial instruments, goodwill, long-lived assets
and other intangible assets, impairment, the fair value of stock
awards, as well as the recognition of revenue. These assumptions,
judgments and estimates are drawn from historical experience and
various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the
circumstances as of the date of the Consolidated Financial
Statements. Actual results could differ materially from our
estimates, and such differences could significantly impact our
financial results.
Legal, Regulatory and Compliance Risks
Our business is subject to extensive government regulation and
supervision, which could materially adversely affect our results of
operations and financial condition.
We, primarily through our Banks and certain non-bank subsidiaries,
are subject to extensive federal and state regulation and
supervision. Banking and consumer financial protection regulations
are intended to protect consumers, depositors’ funds, the DIF, and
the safety and soundness of the banking system as a whole, not
stockholders. These regulations affect our lending practices,
capital structure, investment practices, dividend policy and
growth, among other things. Federal and state legislative bodies
and regulatory agencies continually review banking laws,
regulations and policies for possible changes. Compliance with laws
and regulations can be difficult and costly, and changes to laws
and regulations, as well as increased intensity in supervision,
often impose additional compliance costs. The scope of the laws and
regulations and the intensity of the supervision to which we are
subject have increased in recent years, initially in response to
the financial crisis, and more recently in light of other factors
such as technological and market changes. Regulatory enforcement
and fines have also increased across the banking and financial
services sector. Further, the scope of regulation and the intensity
of supervision will likely remain high in the current regulatory
environment, including with respect to late fees, interchange fees
and other matters. Such changes could subject us to additional
costs, limit the types of financial services and products we may
offer, and/or limit what we may charge for certain banking
services, among other things. Most recently, in February 2023, the
CFPB published a proposed rule with request for public comment that
would: (i) decrease the safe harbor dollar amount for credit card
late fees to $8 and eliminate a higher safe harbor dollar amount
for subsequent late payments; (ii) eliminate the annual inflation
adjustments that currently exist for the late fee safe harbor
dollar amounts; and (iii) require that late fees not exceed 25% of
the consumer’s required minimum payment. The “safe harbor” dollar
amounts
referenced in the CFPB’s proposed rulemaking refer to the amounts
that credit card issuers may charge as late fees under the CARD
Act. Under the CARD Act, as implemented, these safe harbor amounts
have been subject to annual adjustment based on changes in the
consumer price index, and the safe harbor amounts are currently set
at $30 for an initial late fee and $41 for subsequent late fees in
one of the next six billing cycles. Accordingly, the proposed $8
safe harbor amount on late fees (and proposed elimination of the
annual inflation-based adjustment thereto) would represent a
significant decrease from the current safe harbor amounts. In
addition, the proposed rulemaking seeks comment on whether late
fees should be prohibited if the applicable payment is made within
15 days of the due date and whether, as a condition to utilizing
the safe harbor, credit card issuers should be required to offer
automatic payment options and/or provide certain notifications of
upcoming payment due dates. We are closely monitoring the content
and timing of the CFPB’s proposed rulemaking and its impact on our
business.
We expect that we, like the rest of the banking sector, will remain
subject to increased regulation and supervision of our industry by
bank regulatory agencies and that there may be additional and
changing requirements and conditions imposed on us, any of which
could increase our costs, require increased management attention,
and adversely impact our results of operations.
In connection with their continuous supervision and examinations of
us, the FDIC, CFPB and/or other regulatory agencies may require
changes in our business or operations, and any such changes may be
judicially enforceable or impractical for us to contest. We may
also become subject to formal or informal enforcement and other
supervisory actions, including memoranda of understanding, written
agreements, cease-and-desist orders, and prompt-corrective-action
or safety-and-soundness directives. Supervisory actions could
entail significant restrictions on our existing business, our
ability to develop new business, our flexibility in conducting
operations, and our ability to pay dividends or utilize capital.
Enforcement and other supervisory actions also can result in the
imposition of civil monetary penalties or injunctions, related
litigation by private plaintiffs, damage to our reputation, and a
loss of customer or investor confidence. We could be required, as
well, to dispose of specified assets and liabilities within a
prescribed period of time. As a result, any enforcement or other
supervisory action could have an adverse effect on our business,
results of operations, financial condition and
prospects.
In addition, changes in the regulatory and supervisory environments
could adversely affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways,
including by limiting the types of financial services and products
we may offer, enhancing the ability of others to offer more
competitive financial services and products, restricting our
ability to make acquisitions or pursue other profitable
opportunities, and negatively impacting our results of operations
and financial condition. Changes in the prevailing interpretations
of federal or state laws and related regulations could also
invalidate or call into question the legality of certain of our
services and business practices.
Our failure to comply with the laws, regulations, and supervisory
actions to which we are subject, even if the failure is inadvertent
or reflects a difference in interpretation, could subject us to
fines, other penalties, and restrictions on our business
activities, any of which could adversely affect our business,
results of operations, financial condition, cash flows, capital
base, and/or the price of our securities.
See “Business — Supervision and Regulation” for more information
about certain laws and regulations to which we are subject and
their impact on us.
Litigation and other actions and disputes could subject us to
significant fines, penalties, judgments and/or requirements
resulting in significantly increased expenses, damage to our
reputation and/or a material adverse effect on our
business.
Businesses in the financial services and payments industry has
historically been, and continue to be, subject to significant legal
actions, including class action lawsuits. Many of these actions
have included claims for substantial compensatory or punitive
damages. While we have historically relied on our arbitration
clause (which includes a class action waiver) in agreements with
customers to limit our exposure to class action litigation, there
can be no assurance that we will always be successful in enforcing
our arbitration clause in the future. There may also be
legislative, regulatory or other efforts to limit or eliminate the
use of arbitration clauses or class action waivers, and if our
arbitration provisions are found to be unenforceable or are
otherwise limited or eliminated, our exposure to class action
litigation could increase significantly. Further,
even
if our arbitration clause remains enforceable, we may be subject to
mass arbitrations in which large groups of consumers bring
arbitrations against us simultaneously.
The continued focus of merchants on issues relating to the
acceptance of various forms of payment may lead to additional
litigation and other legal actions. Given the inherent
uncertainties involved in litigation, and the very large or
indeterminate damages sought in some matters asserted against us,
there is significant uncertainty as to the ultimate liability we
may incur from litigation.
In addition to litigation and regulatory matters, from time to
time, through our operational and compliance controls, we identify
compliance issues that require us to make operational changes and,
depending on the nature of the issue, result in financial
remediation to impacted cardholders. These self-identified issues
and voluntary remediation payments could be significant depending
on the issue and the number of cardholders impacted. They also
could generate litigation or regulatory investigations that subject
us to additional adverse effects on our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Our Banks are subject to extensive federal and state regulation
that may restrict their ability to make cash available to us and
may require us to make capital contributions to them.
Federal and state laws and regulations extensively regulate the
operations of our Banks, including to limit the ability of the
Banks to pay dividends or make other distributions to us. Many of
these laws and regulations are intended to maintain the safety and
soundness of our Banks, and they impose significant restraints on
them to which other non-regulated entities are not
subject.
Our Banks must maintain minimum amounts of regulatory capital. If
the Banks do not meet these capital requirements, their respective
regulators have broad discretion to institute a number of
corrective actions that could have a direct material effect on our
liquidity, ability to grow our business and financial condition. To
pay any dividend, the Banks must each maintain adequate capital
above regulatory guidelines. Accordingly, neither CB nor CCB may be
able to make any of their cash or other assets available to us,
including to service our indebtedness. If either of our Banks were
to fail to meet any of the capital requirements to which it is
subject, we may be required to provide them with additional
capital, which could also impair our ability to service our
indebtedness.
In addition, under the “source of strength” requirement, we are
required to serve as a source of financial strength to our Banks
and may not conduct our operations in an unsafe or unsound manner.
Under these requirements, in the future, we could be required to
provide financial assistance to our Banks if the Banks experience
financial distress. This support may be required at times when we
might otherwise have determined not to provide it or when doing so
is not otherwise in our interests or the interests of our
stockholders or creditors.
If legislative attempts to amend the BHC Act to eliminate the
exclusion of credit card banks or industrial loan companies from
the definition of “bank” are successful, or if we voluntarily take
such action that results in the Parent Company becoming a
federally-regulated BHC, we would become subject to additional
regulation applicable to BHCs, which could increase our compliance
and regulatory costs and have other effects that could be
materially adverse to our business.
The Dodd-Frank Act mandates multiple studies, which could result in
future legislative or regulatory action. In particular, the
Government Accountability Office issued its study on whether it is
necessary, in order to strengthen the safety and soundness of
institutions or the stability of the financial system of the United
States, to eliminate the exemptions to the definition of “bank”
under the BHC Act for certain institutions including limited
purpose credit card banks and industrial loan companies. The study
did not recommend the elimination of these exemptions. However,
legislation is periodically introduced that would eliminate this
exception for industrial loan companies and other “non-bank banks”.
If such legislation were enacted without any grandfathering of or
accommodations for existing institutions, we could be required to
become a BHC.
As a BHC, we and our non-bank subsidiaries would be subject to
supervision, regulation and examination by the Federal Reserve
Board. We would be required to provide annual reports and such
additional information as the Federal Reserve Board may require
pursuant to the BHC Act, and applicable regulations. In addition,
we would be subject to consolidated regulatory capital
requirements.
Pursuant to provisions of the BHC Act and regulations promulgated
by the Federal Reserve Board thereunder, a BHC may only engage in,
or own companies that engage in, activities deemed by the Federal
Reserve Board to be permissible for BHCs or financial holding
companies. Activities permissible for BHCs are those that are so
closely related to the business of banking or managing or
controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. Permissible
activities for financial holding companies include those “so
closely related to banking as to be a proper incident thereto” as
well as certain additional activities deemed “financial in nature
or incidental to such financial activity” or complementary to a
financial activity and that do not pose a substantial risk to the
safety and soundness of the depository institution or the financial
system. If we were required to become a BHC, we may be required to
modify or discontinue certain of our business activities, which may
materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition.
Increases in FDIC insurance premiums may have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations.
We are generally unable to control the amount of premiums that are
required to be paid for FDIC insurance. If there are bank or
financial institution failures, we may be required to pay
significantly higher premiums than the levels currently imposed or
additional special assessments or taxes that could adversely affect
our earnings. Any future increases or required prepayments in FDIC
insurance premiums may materially adversely affect our results of
operations.
Noncompliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and other anti-money
laundering statutes and regulations could cause us material
financial loss.
The Bank Secrecy Act and the PATRIOT Act contain anti-money
laundering and financial transparency provisions intended to detect
and prevent the use of the U.S. financial system for money
laundering and terrorist financing activities. The Bank Secrecy
Act, as amended by the PATRIOT Act, requires depository
institutions and their holding companies to undertake activities
including maintaining an anti-money laundering program, verifying
the identity of partners and customers, monitoring for and
reporting suspicious transactions, reporting on cash transactions
exceeding specified thresholds, and responding to requests for
information by regulatory authorities and law enforcement agencies.
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), a unit of the
Treasury Department that administers the Bank Secrecy Act, is
authorized to impose significant civil money penalties for
violations of those requirements and has recently engaged in
coordinated enforcement efforts with the
Federal Banking Agencies,
as well as the U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement
Administration, and Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
Regulation in the areas of privacy, data protection, data
governance, account access and information and cyber security could
increase our costs and affect or limit our business opportunities
and how we collect and/or use personal information.
Legislators and regulators in the United States and other countries
are increasingly adopting or revising privacy, data protection,
data governance, account access, and information and cyber security
laws, including data localization, authentication and notification
laws. As such laws are interpreted and applied (in some cases, with
significant differences or conflicting requirements across
jurisdictions), compliance and technology costs will continue to
increase, particularly in the context of ensuring that adequate
data governance, data protection, data transfer and account access
mechanisms are in place.
Compliance with current or future privacy, data protection, data
governance, account access, and information and cyber security laws
could significantly impact our collection, use, sharing, retention
and safeguarding of consumer and/or employee information and could
restrict our ability to provide certain products and services,
which could materially and adversely affect our profitability. Our
failure to comply with such laws could result in potentially
significant regulatory and/or governmental investigations and/or
actions, litigation, fines, sanctions, ongoing regulatory
monitoring, customer attrition, decreases in the use or acceptance
of our cards and damage to our reputation and our
brand.
For more information on regulatory and legislative activity in this
area, see “Privacy and Data Protection Regulation”
above.
We may not be able to effectively manage the operational and
compliance risks to which we are exposed.
Operational risk is the risk arising from inadequate or failed
internal processes or systems, human errors or misconduct, or
adverse external events. Operational losses result from internal
fraud; external fraud; inadequate or inappropriate employment
practices and workplace safety; failure to meet professional
obligations involving partners, products, and business practices;
damage to physical assets; business disruption and systems
failures; and/or failures in execution, delivery, and process
management. As processes or organizations are changed, or new
products and services are introduced, we may not fully appreciate
or identify new operational risks that may arise from such changes.
Through human error, fraud or malfeasance, conduct risk can result
in harm to customers, broader markets and the company and its
employees.
Compliance risk arises from the failure to adhere to applicable
laws, rules, regulations and internal policies and procedures. We
need to continually update and enhance our control environment to
address operational and compliance risks. Operational and
compliance failures or deficiencies in our control environment can
expose us to reputational and legal risks as well as fines, civil
money penalties or payment of damages and can lead to diminished
business opportunities and diminished ability to expand key
operations.
Our failure to protect our intellectual property rights and use of
open source software may harm our competitive position, and
litigation to protect our intellectual property rights or defend
against third party allegations of infringement may be costly, any
of which could negatively impact our business, results of
operations and profitability.
Third parties may infringe or misappropriate our trademarks or
other intellectual property rights, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial
condition. The actions we take to protect our trademarks and other
proprietary rights may not be adequate. Litigation may be necessary
to enforce our intellectual property rights, protect our trade
secrets or determine the validity and scope of the proprietary
rights of others. Any infringement or misappropriation could harm
any competitive advantage we currently derive or may derive from
our proprietary rights. Third parties may also assert infringement
claims against us. Any claims and an adverse determination in any
resulting litigation could subject us to significant liability for
damages and require us to either design around a third party’s
patent or license alternative technology from another party. In
addition, litigation is time consuming and expensive to defend and
could result in the diversion of our time and resources. Further,
our competitors or other third parties may independently design
around or develop similar technology, or otherwise duplicate our
services or products in a way that would preclude us from asserting
our intellectual property rights against them. In addition, our
contractual arrangements may not effectively prevent disclosure of
our intellectual property or confidential and proprietary
information, or provide an adequate remedy in the event of an
unauthorized disclosure.
Aspects of our platform include software covered by open source
licenses. United States courts have not interpreted the terms of
various open source licenses, but could interpret them in a manner
that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our
platform. If portions of our proprietary software are determined to
be subject to an open source license, we could also be required to,
under certain circumstances, publicly release or license, at no
cost, our products that incorporate the open source software or the
affected portions of our source code. In addition to risks related
to license requirements, usage of open source software can lead to
greater risks than use of third-party commercial software because
open source licensors generally do not provide warranties or other
contractual protections regarding infringement, misappropriation,
security vulnerabilities, defects or errors in the code or other
violations, any of which could result in liability to us and
negatively impact our business, results of operations,
profitability and financial condition.
We have international operations that subject us to various
international risks as well as increased compliance and regulatory
risks and costs.
We have international operations, primarily in India, and some of
our third-party service providers provide services to us from other
countries, all of which subject us to a number of international
risks, including, among other things, sovereign volatility and
socio-political instability. Any future social or political
instability in the countries in which we operate could have a
material adverse effect on our business. U.S. regulations also
govern various aspects of the international activities of domestic
corporations and increase our compliance and regulatory risks and
costs. Any failure on our part or the part of our service providers
to comply with applicable U.S. regulations, as well as the
regulations in the countries and markets in which we or they
operate, could result in fines, penalties, injunctions or other
similar restrictions, any of which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Tax legislation initiatives or challenges to our tax positions
could adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition.
We are subject to tax laws and regulations in U.S. federal, state,
local and foreign jurisdictions. From time to time legislative
initiatives may be proposed, which, if enacted, may impact our
effective tax rate and could adversely affect our deferred tax
assets, tax positions and/or our tax liabilities. In addition, U.S.
federal, state, local, and foreign tax laws and regulations are
extremely complex and subject to varying interpretations. There can
be no assurance that our historical tax positions will not be
challenged by the relevant taxing authorities, or that we would be
successful in defending our positions in connection with any such
challenge.
Anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents and
Delaware law may discourage or prevent a change of control, even if
an acquisition would be beneficial to our stockholders, which could
affect our stock price adversely and prevent or delay change of
control transactions or attempts by our stockholders to replace or
remove our current management.
Delaware law, as well as provisions of our certificate of
incorporation, including those relating to our Board’s authority to
issue series of preferred stock without further stockholder
approval, our bylaws and our existing and future debt
instruments, could discourage unsolicited proposals to acquire us,
even though such proposals may be beneficial to our
stockholders.
In addition, we are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the
Delaware General Corporation Law, which may prohibit certain
business combinations with stockholders owning 15% or more of our
outstanding voting stock. These and other provisions in our
certificate of incorporation, bylaws and Delaware law could make it
more difficult for stockholders or potential acquirers to obtain
control of our Board of Directors or initiate actions that are
opposed by our then-current Board of Directors, including a merger,
tender offer or proxy contest involving us. Any delay or prevention
of a change of control transaction or changes in our Board of
Directors could cause the market price of our common stock to
decline or delay or prevent our stockholders from receiving a
premium over the market price of our common stock that they might
otherwise receive.
Cybersecurity, Technology and Vendor Risks
We rely on third-party vendors to provide various products and
services that are important to our operations, and our business
could be adversely impacted if our vendors fail to fulfill their
obligations.
Some services important to our business are outsourced to
third-party vendors, and we contract with numerous other
third-party vendors for a range of products and services. The
inability or failure of these vendors to deliver products and
services at contracted service levels or standards and in a timely
manner could adversely affect our business. In addition, if a
third-party vendor fails to meet other contractual requirements,
such as compliance with applicable laws and regulations, or suffers
a cyberattack or other security breach, our business operations
could suffer economic or reputational harm that could have a
material adverse impact on our business and results of operations.
Further, if our significant vendors are unable or unwilling to
fulfill or renew our existing contracts on current terms, we might
not be able to replace the related product or service at the same
cost, in a timely fashion, or at all, any of which could negatively
impact our profitability, business and operations, in some cases
materially.
We recently completed the transition of our credit card processing
services to strategic outsourcing partners.
The transition was a significant and complex undertaking, which
resulted in unanticipated platform stability issues and related
impacts that have adversely impacted, and may continue to adversely
impact, our business, results of operations, reputation and
brand.
In late June 2022, we completed the transition of our credit card
processing services to strategic outsourcing partners, including
Fiserv for our core processing services and Microsoft for related
cloud infrastructure services. As we described in our 2021 Annual
Report on Form 10-K, transitioning these services from our legacy
platforms to strategic partners with established systems and
functionality presented significant risks, including, but not
limited to, potential losses or corruption of data, changes in
security processes, implementation delays and cost overruns,
resistance from current partners and account holders, disruption to
operations, loss of customization or functionality, reliability
issues with legacy systems prior to cutover and incurrence of
outsized consulting costs to complete the transition. In addition,
as previously disclosed, the pursuit of multiple new product
integrations and outsourcing transitions simultaneously increased
the complexity and risk, as well as magnified the potential for the
unintended consequences, including an inability to retain or
replace key personnel during the transition as well as the
incurrence of unexpected expenses as we adopted new processes for
managing these service providers and established controls and
procedures to ensure regulatory compliance.
In connection with the transition, we experienced unanticipated
issues with platform stability, which resulted in outages and
interruptions in our call center operations and online customer
service platforms. These outages and interruptions resulted in a
number of adverse impacts, including customer complaints, negative
social media postings, reputational damage, regulatory scrutiny,
lost potential revenue, remediation costs, timing-related impacts
to our Delinquency rate and Net loss rate data, and increased
consulting and professional fees.
These challenges associated with the transition have adversely
impacted, and may continue to adversely impact, our business,
results of operations, financial condition, and result in damage to
our reputation and our brand.
Moreover, now that we have completed this transition, it would be
difficult and disruptive for us to replace certain of these
third-party vendors, particularly Fiserv, in a timely or seamless
manner if they were unwilling or unable to continue to provide us
with these services in the future (as a result of their financial
or business conditions or otherwise), which could materially impact
our business and operations.
Failure to safeguard our data and consumer privacy could affect our
reputation among our partners and their customers, and may expose
us to legal claims.
Although we have extensive physical and cyber security controls and
associated procedures, our data has in the past been and in the
future may be subject to unauthorized access. In such instances of
unauthorized access, we may have data loss
that could harm our customers and brand partners. This in turn
could lead to reputational risk as concerns with security and
privacy of data may result in consumers not wanting to participate
in our product offerings. We also have arrangements in place with
our partners and other third parties through which we share and
receive information about their customers who are or may become our
customers, which magnifies certain information security issues.
Information security risks for large financial institutions have
increased with the adoption of new technologies, including those
used on mobile devices, to conduct financial and other business
transactions, and the increased sophistication and activity level
of threat actors. The use of our products and services could
decline if any compromise of physical or cyber security occurred.
In addition, any unauthorized release of customer information or
any public perception that we released customer information without
authorization, could subject us to legal claims from our partners
or their customers, consumers or regulatory enforcement actions,
which may adversely affect our partner relationships
and result in damage to our reputation and our
brand.
We cannot be certain that our cybersecurity insurance coverage will
be adequate for cybersecurity liabilities actually incurred, that
insurance will continue to be available to us on economically
reasonable terms, or at all, or that our insurer will not deny
coverage as to any future claim.
Business interruptions, including loss of data center capacity,
interruption due to cyber-attacks, loss of network connectivity or
inability to utilize proprietary software of third party vendors,
could affect our ability to timely meet the needs of our partners
and customers and harm our business.
Our ability, and that of our third-party service providers and
brand partners, to protect our data centers and other facilities
and systems against damage, loss or performance degradation from
power loss, network failure, cyber-attacks, including ransomware or
denial of service attacks, insider threats, hardware and software
defects or malfunctions, human error, computer viruses or other
malware, public health crises, disruptions in telecommunications
services, fraud, fires and other disasters and other events is
critical. In order to provide many of our services, we must be able
to store, retrieve, process and manage large amounts of data, as
well as periodically expand and upgrade our technology
capabilities. Any damage to our data centers or other facilities
and systems, or those of our third-party service providers or brand
partners, any failure of our network links that interrupts our
operations or any impairment of our ability to use our software or
the proprietary software of third party vendors, including
impairments due to cyber-attacks, could adversely affect our
ability to meet our partners’ and customers’ needs and their
confidence in utilizing us for future services. In addition, any
failure to successfully implement new information systems and
technologies, or improvements or upgrades to existing information
systems and technologies in a timely manner could have an adverse
impact on our business if we are not able to be competitive with
other financial services companies, and could also adversely impact
our internal controls (including internal controls over financial
reporting), results of operations, and financial
condition.
If we are not able to invest successfully in, and compete at the
leading edge of, technological developments in our industry, our
revenue and profitability could be materially adversely
affected.
Our industry is subject to rapid and significant technological
changes. In order to compete in our industry, we need to continue
to invest in technology across all areas of our business, including
in access management, vulnerability management, transaction
processing, data management and analytics, machine learning and
artificial intelligence, customer interactions and communications,
alternative payment and financing mechanisms, authentication
technologies and digital identification, tokenization, real-time
settlement, and risk management and compliance systems.
Incorporating new technologies into our products and services,
including developing the appropriate governance and controls
consistent with regulatory expectations, requires substantial
expenditures and takes considerable time, and ultimately may not be
successful. We expect that new technologies in the payments
industry will continue to emerge, and these new technologies may be
superior to, or render obsolete, our existing
technology.
The process of developing new products and services, enhancing
existing products and services and adapting to technological
changes and evolving industry standards is complex, costly and
uncertain, and any failure by us to anticipate partners’ and
customers’ changing needs and emerging technological trends
accurately could significantly impede our ability to compete
effectively. Partner and customer adoption is a key competitive
factor and our competitors may develop products, platforms or
technologies that become more widely adopted than ours. In
addition, we may underestimate the time and expense we must invest
in new products and services before they generate significant
revenues, if at all. Our use of artificial intelligence and machine
learning is subject to risks related to flaws in our algorithms and
datasets that may be insufficient or contain biased information.
These deficiencies could undermine the decisions based on impact to
data quality, predictions or analysis such technologies produce,
subjecting us to competitive harm, legal liability, and harm to our
reputation or brand.
Our ability to develop, acquire or access competitive technologies
or business processes on acceptable terms may also be limited by
intellectual property rights that third parties, including those
that current and potential competitors, may assert. In addition,
our ability to adopt new technologies may be inhibited by the
emergence of industry-wide standards, a changing legislative and
regulatory environment, an inability to develop appropriate
governance and controls, a lack of internal product and engineering
expertise, resistance to change from partners or consumers, lack of
appropriate change management processes or the complexity of our
systems.
Risks Related to the LoyaltyOne Spinoff
The LoyaltyOne spinoff could result in substantial tax liability to
us and our stockholders, and more generally we could be adversely
affected by the performance of, or disputes involving,
LVI.
In November 2021, we completed the spinoff of our former LoyaltyOne
segment, consisting of the Canadian AIR MILES® Reward Program and
the Netherlands-based BrandLoyalty businesses, into an independent,
publicly traded company, LVI. As part of the spinoff, we retained
19% of the outstanding shares of common stock of LVI.
We received a private letter ruling, or PLR, from the IRS and an
opinion from our tax advisor to the effect that the spinoff of our
former LoyaltyOne segment qualified as tax-free for U.S. federal
income tax purposes for us and our stockholders (except for cash
received in lieu of fractional shares). However, if the factual
assumptions or representations made by us in connection with the
delivery of the PLR opinion are inaccurate or incomplete in any
material respect, including those relating to the past and future
conduct of our business, we may not be able to rely on the PLR
opinion. Furthermore, the PLR does not address all the issues that
are relevant to determining whether the spinoff qualified for
tax-free treatment, and the opinion from our tax advisor is not
binding on the IRS or the courts. If, notwithstanding receipt of
the PLR and the opinion from our tax advisor, the spinoff
transaction and certain related transactions are determined to be
taxable, we would be subject to a substantial tax liability. In
addition, if the spinoff transaction is taxable, each holder of our
common stock who received shares of LVI in connection with the
spinoff would generally be treated as receiving a taxable
distribution of property in an amount equal to the fair market
value of the shares received.
Even if the spinoff otherwise qualifies as a tax-free transaction,
the distribution would be taxable to us (but not to our
stockholders) in certain circumstances if future significant
acquisitions of our stock or the stock of LVI are deemed to be part
of a plan or series of related transactions that included the
spinoff. In this event, the resulting tax liability could be
substantial, and could discourage, delay or prevent a change of
control of us. In connection with the spinoff, we entered into a
tax matters agreement with LVI, pursuant to which LVI agreed to not
enter into any transaction that could cause any portion of the
spinoff to be taxable to us without our consent and to indemnify us
for any tax liability resulting from any such transaction.
Subsequently, we agreed to accommodate LVI’s potential disposition
of certain assets. While we believe that such disposition should
not affect the qualification of the spinoff as a tax-free
transaction, it is possible the IRS could disagree and successfully
assert that the spinoff should be taxable to us and our
shareholders that received LVI shares in the spinoff. In addition,
it is possible that the IRS could view this disposition as
inconsistent with the PLR and, as a result, the IRS could take the
position that we cannot rely on the PLR.
More generally, we could continue to be adversely affected by the
performance of LVI. During 2022, LVI’s stock price decreased
significantly and, as a result, we wrote down the value of our 19%
shareholding in LVI from $50 million as of December 31,
2021 to $6 million as of December 31, 2022. While we had
intended to divest our ownership position in LVI in a tax-efficient
manner within 12 months of the spinoff, market conditions and other
factors prevented us from doing so. As such, we may be unable to
divest our ownership position in LVI a timely manner and may be
required to write down further the value of our position. Also, our
post-spinoff arrangements and relationships with LVI may be
impacted by the performance of LVI.
Moreover, though we believe that our process and decision-making
with respect to the spinoff transaction were entirely appropriate,
we could become involved in disputes with LVI or other third
parties relating to the spinoff. Any dispute relating to the
spinoff could distract management, result in legal and other costs,
and otherwise adversely impact our financial position, results of
operations and financial condition.
RISK MANAGEMENT
Our Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) program is designed to ensure
that all significant risks are identified, measured, monitored and
addressed. Our ERM program reflects our risk appetite, governance,
culture and reporting. We manage enterprise risk using our
Board-approved Enterprise Risk Management Framework, which includes
Board-level oversight, risk management committees, and a dedicated
risk management team led by our Chief Risk Officer (CRO). Our Board
and executive management determine the level of risk the Company is
willing to accept in pursuit of its objectives through the ERM
program and the well-defined risk appetite statements developed
thereunder. We utilize the “three lines of defense” risk management
model to assign roles, responsibilities and accountabilities in the
Company for taking and managing risk.
Governance and Accountability
Board and Board Committees
Our Board of Directors, as a whole and through its committees,
maintains responsibilities for the oversight of risk management,
including monitoring the “tone at the top,” and our risk culture
and overseeing emerging and strategic risks. While our Board’s Risk
Committee has primary responsibility for oversight of enterprise
risk management, the Audit, Compensation & Human Capital and
Nominating & Corporate Governance Committees also oversee risks
within their respective areas of responsibilities. Each of these
Board Committees consists entirely of independent directors and
provides regular reports to the full Board regarding matters
reviewed at their Committee meetings.
Risk Management Roles and Responsibilities
In addition to our Board and Board Committees, responsibility for
risk management also flows to other individuals and entities
throughout the Company, including various management committees and
executive management. Our ERM Framework defines our “three lines of
defense” risk management model, which includes the
following:
•The
“first line of defense” is comprised of the business areas that
engage in activities that generate revenue or provide operational
support or services that introduce risk to the Company. As the
business owner, the first line of defense is responsible for, among
other things, identifying, owning, managing and controlling key
risks associated with their activities, timely addressing issues
and remediation, and implementing processes and procedures to
strengthen the risk and control environment. The first line of
defense identifies and manages key risk indicators and risks and
controls consistent with the Company’s risk appetite. The executive
officers who serve as leaders in the “first line of defense,” are
responsible for ensuring that their respective functions operate
within established risk limits, in accordance with our risk
appetite. These leaders are also responsible for identifying risks,
considering risk when developing strategic plans, budgets and new
products, and implementing appropriate risk controls when pursuing
business strategies and objectives. In addition, these leaders are
responsible for deploying sufficient financial resources and
qualified personnel to manage the risks inherent in our business
activities.
•The
“second line of defense” consists of an independent risk management
team charged with oversight and monitoring of risk within the
business. The second line of defense is responsible for, among
other things, formulating our ERM Framework and related policies
and procedures, challenging the first line of defense and
identifying, monitoring and reporting on aggregate risks of the
business and support functions.
Our risk management team, which is led by our CRO and includes
compliance, provides oversight of our risk profile and is
responsible for maintaining a compliance program that includes
compliance risk assessment, policy development, testing and
reporting activities.
The CRO manages our risk management team and is responsible for
establishing and implementing standards for the identification,
management, measurement, monitoring and reporting of risk on an
Enterprise-wide basis. The CRO is responsible for developing an
appropriate risk appetite with corresponding limits that aligns
with supervisory expectations, and proposing our risk appetite to
the Board of Directors. The CRO regularly reports to the Risk
Committee as well as the Banks’ Risk and Compliance Committees on
risk management matters.
•The
“third line of defense” is comprised of the Global Audit
organization. The third line of defense provides an independent
review and objective assessment of the design and operating
effectiveness of the first and second lines of defense, governance,
policies, procedures, processes and internal controls, and reports
its findings to executive management and the Board, through the
Audit Committee. Global Audit is responsible for performing
periodic, independent reviews and testing compliance with the
Company’s and the Banks’ risk management policies and standards, as
well as with regulatory guidance and industry best practices.
Global Audit also assesses
the design of the Company'’ and the Banks’ policies and standards
and validates the effectiveness of risk management controls, and
reports the results of such reviews to the Audit
Committee.
Management Committees
The Company operates several internal management committees,
including at each of our Banks a Bank Risk Management Committee
(BRMC) and, effective January 2023, an IT Governance Committee
(ITGC). The BRMCs and ITGCs are the highest-level management
committees at the Banks to oversee risks and are responsible for
risk governance, risk oversight and making recommendations on the
Banks’ risk appetite. The BRMCs and ITGC’s monitor compliance with
limits and related escalation requirements, and oversee
implementation of risk policies.
In addition to the BRMCs, we maintain the following risk management
committees at each of our Banks to oversee the risks listed below:
the Credit Risk Management Committee; Compliance Risk Management
Committee; Operational Risk Management Committee; Model Risk
Management Committee; and the Asset & Liability Management
Committee. Each of these Committees is responsible for one or more
of the Banks’ eight risk categories, which are described in greater
detail below under the heading “Risk Categories”. For its risk
category(ies) of responsibility, each Committee provides risk
governance, risk oversight and monitoring. Each Committee reviews
key risk exposures, trends and significant compliance matters, and
provides guidance on steps to monitor, control and escalate
significant risks. We include the risk information provided by the
BRMCs and the ITGC, and these management risk committees, along
with additional risk information that is identified at the Parent
Company level in our determination and assessment of the risks that
are presented to and discussed with our Board and Board
Committees.
Risk Categories
We have divided risk into the following eight categories: credit,
market, liquidity, operational, compliance, model, strategic and
reputational risk. We evaluate the potential impact of a risk event
on us (including our subsidiaries) by assessing the customer,
partner, financial, reputational, and legal and regulatory
impacts.
Credit Risk
Credit Risk is the risk arising from an obligor’s failure to meet
the terms of any contract or otherwise perform as agreed. Credit
Risk is found in all activities in which settlement or repayment
depends on counterparty, issuer, or borrower
performance.
We are exposed to credit risk relating to the credit card,
installment or other loans we make to our customers. Our credit
risk relates to the risk that consumers using the private label,
co-brand, general purpose or business credit cards or installment
or other loans that we issue will not repay their loan balances. To
minimize our risk of credit card, installment or other loan
write-offs, we have developed automated proprietary scoring
technology and verification procedures to make risk-based
origination decisions when approving new accountholders,
establishing or adjusting accountholder credit limits and applying
our risk-based pricing. The credit risk on our credit card,
installment or other loans is quantified through our Allowance for
credit losses which is recorded net with Credit card and other
loans on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Credit risk is overseen
and monitored by the Credit Risk Management Committee.
Market Risk
Market Risk includes interest rate risk which is the risk arising
from movements in interest rates. Interest rate risk results
from:
•differences
between the timing of rate changes and the timing of cash flows
(repricing risk);
•changing
rate relationships among different yield curves affecting an
organization’s activities (basis risk);
•hanging
rate relationships across the spectrum of maturities (yield curve
risk); and
•interest-related
options embedded in certain products (options risk).
Our principal market risk exposures arise from volatility in
interest rates and their impact on economic value, capitalization
levels and earnings. We use various market risk measurement
techniques and analyses to measure, assess and manage the impact of
changes in interest rates on our Net interest income. The approach
we use to quantify interest rate risk is a sensitivity analysis,
which we believe best reflects the risk inherent in our business.
This approach calculates the impact on Net interest income from an
instantaneous and sustained 100 basis point increase or decrease in
interest rates. Due to the mix of fixed and floating rate assets
and liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
December 31, 2022, this
hypothetical instantaneous 100 basis point increase or decrease in
interest rates would have an insignificant impact on our annual Net
interest income. Actual changes in our Net interest income will
depend on many factors, and therefore may differ from our estimated
risk to changes in interest rates. The Asset & Liability
Management Committee assists the Banks’ Board of Directors and Bank
Management in overseeing, reviewing, and monitoring market
risk.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity Risk is the risk arising from an inability to meet
obligations when they come due. Liquidity Risk includes the
inability to access funding sources or manage fluctuations in
funding levels. Liquidity Risk also results from an organization’s
failure to recognize or address changes in market conditions. The
primary liquidity objective is to maintain a liquidity profile that
will enable us, even in times of stress or market disruption, to
fund our existing assets and meet liabilities in a timely manner
and at an acceptable cost. Policy and risk appetite limits require
the Company and the Banks to ensure that sufficient liquid assets
are available to survive liquidity stresses over a specified time
period. The Asset & Liability Management Committee assists the
Banks Board of Directors and Bank Management in overseeing,
reviewing, and monitoring liquidity risk.
Operational Risk
Operational Risk is the risk arising from inadequate or failed
internal processes or systems, human errors or misconduct, or
adverse external events. Operational losses result from internal
fraud; external fraud; inadequate or inappropriate employment
practices and workplace safety; failure to meet obligations
involving customers, partners, products, and business practices;
damage to physical assets; business disruption and systems
failures; and/or failures in execution, delivery, and process
management.
Operational risk is inherent in all business activities and can
impact us through direct or indirect financial loss, brand damage,
customer dissatisfaction, and legal and regulatory penalties. The
Company has implemented a comprehensive operational risk framework
that is defined in the Operational Risk Management Policy. The
Operational Risk Management Committee, chaired by our Chief
Operational Risk Officer, oversees and monitors operational risk
exposures, including escalating issues and recommending policies,
procedures and practices to manage operational risks.
As part of our Operational Risk Program, we maintain an information
and cyber security program, which is led by our Chief Information
Security Officer and is designed to protect the confidentiality,
integrity, and availability of information and information systems
from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption,
modification, or destruction. The Program is built upon a
foundation of advanced security technology, a well-staffed and
highly trained team of experts, and robust operations based on the
National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity
Framework. This consists of controls designed to identify, protect,
detect, respond and recover from information and cyber security
incidents. We continue to invest in enhancements to cyber security
capabilities and engage in industry and government forums to
promote advancements to the broader financial services cyber
security ecosystem.
Compliance Risk
Compliance Risk is the risk arising from violations of laws or
regulations, or from nonconformance with prescribed practices,
internal policies and procedures, or ethical standards. This risk
exposes organizations to fines, payment of damages, and the voiding
of contracts. Our Compliance organization is responsible for
establishing and maintaining our Compliance Risk Management
Program. Pursuant to this Program, we seek to manage and mitigate
compliance risk by assessing, controlling, monitoring, measuring
and reporting the legal and regulatory risks to which we are
exposed. The Compliance Risk Management Committee, chaired by the
Chief Compliance Officer, oversees the implementation and execution
of the Compliance Management System and monitors compliance
exposures to manage compliance risks.
Model Risk
Model Risk is the risk arising from decisions based on incorrect or
misused model outputs and reports. Model risk occurs primarily for
three reasons: (1) a model may have fundamental errors and produce
inaccurate outputs when viewed against its design objective and
intended business uses; (2) a model may be used incorrectly or
inappropriately, or there may be a misunderstanding about its
limitations and assumptions; or (3) the model produces results that
are not compliant with fair lending or other laws and
regulations.
We manage model risk through a comprehensive model governance
framework, including policies and procedures for model development,
maintenance and performance monitoring activities, independent
model validation and change management capabilities. We also assess
model performance on an ongoing basis. Model Risk oversight and
monitoring is conducted by the Model Risk Management
Committee.
Strategic Risk
Strategic Risk is the risk arising from adverse business decisions,
poor implementation of business decisions, or lack of
responsiveness to changes in the industry and operating
environment. This risk is a function of an organization’s strategic
goals, business strategies, resources, and quality of
implementation. Strategic decisions are reviewed and approved by
business leaders and various committees and must be aligned with
our Company policies. We seek to manage strategic and business
risks through risk controls embedded in these processes, as well as
overall risk management oversight over business goals. Existing
product performance is reviewed periodically by various of our
Committees and executive management.
Reputational Risk
Reputational Risk is the risk arising from negative public opinion.
This risk may impair our competitiveness by affecting our ability
to establish new relationships or services, or continue servicing
existing relationships. Reputational Risk is inherent in all
activities and requires us to exercise caution in dealing with
stakeholders, such as customers, counterparties, correspondents,
investors, regulators, employees, and the community. Executive
management is responsible for considering the reputational risk
implications of business activities and strategies, and ensuring
the relevant subject matter experts are engaged as
needed.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff
Comments.
None.
Item 2. Properties.
As of December 31, 2022, we leased 14 general office
properties, comprised of approximately 1 million square feet.
These facilities are used to carry out our operational, sales and
administrative functions. Our principal facilities are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Approximate
Square Footage |
|
Lease Expiration Date |
Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania |
|
9,853 |
|
April 30, 2027 |
Coeur D'Alene, Idaho |
|
114,000 |
|
July 31, 2038 |
Columbus, Ohio |
|
326,354 |
(1)
|
September 12, 2032 |
Columbus, Ohio |
|
103,161 |
|
June 30, 2024 |
Draper, Utah |
|
22,869 |
(1)
|
August 31, 2031 |
New York, New York |
|
18,500 |
|
January 31, 2026 |
Plano, Texas |
|
27,925 |
(1)
|
June 30, 2026 |
Wilmington, Delaware |
|
5,198 |
|
June 30, 2023 |
______________________________
(1)Excludes
square footage of subleased portion.
We believe our current facilities are suitable to our businesses
and that we will be able to lease, purchase or newly construct
additional facilities as needed.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
Refer to Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors—Legal, Regulatory and
Compliance Risks” and Note 15 “Commitments and Contingencies” to
our Consolidated Financial Statements, which is incorporated herein
by reference.
Item 4. Mine Safety
Disclosures.
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common
Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities.
Market Information
Our common stock is listed on the NYSE, and trades under the symbol
“BFH”.
Holders
As of February 22, 2023, the closing price of our common stock
was $40.23 per share, there were 50,115,421 shares of our common
stock outstanding, and there were 99 holders of record of our
common stock.
Dividends
Payment of future dividends is subject to declaration by our Board
of Directors. Factors considered in determining dividends include,
but are not limited to, our profitability, expected capital needs
and legal, regulatory and contractual restrictions. See also “Risk
Factors—There
is no guarantee that we will pay future dividends or repurchase
shares at a level anticipated by stockholders, which could reduce
returns to our stockholders.”.
Subject to these qualifications, we presently expect to continue to
pay dividends on a quarterly basis.
On January 26, 2023, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly
cash dividend of $0.21 per share on our common stock, payable on
March 17, 2023, to stockholders of record at the close of business
on February 10, 2023.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table presents information with respect to purchases
of our common stock made during the three months ended
December 31, 2022:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
(1)
|
|
Average Price Paid
per Share |
|
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs |
|
Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares that
May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( Millions) |
October 1-31 |
|
4,076 |
|
$ |
30.61 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
November 1-30 |
|
3,651 |
|
36.75 |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
December 1-31 |
|
3,816 |
|
38.22 |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
Total |
|
11,543 |
|
$ |
35.07 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
______________________________
(1)During
the periods presented, 11,543 shares of our common stock were
purchased by the administrator of our Bread Financial 401(k) Plan
for the benefit of the employees who participated in that portion
of the Plan.
Stock Performance Graph
The following Stock Performance Graph shows the cumulative total
stockholder return on our common stock compared to an overall stock
market index, the S&P Composite 500 Stock Index (S&P 500
Index), and a published industry index, the S&P Financial
Composite Index (S&P Financial Index), over the five-year
period commencing December 31, 2017 and ended December 31, 2022. As
described under the heading “Business Strategy &
Transformation” in “Part I—Item 1. Business” above, through a
series of strategic initiatives and transactions, we have
simplified our business model as a tech-forward financial services
company. In connection with this transformation, we have elected to
use the S&P Financial Index as our selected index under Item
201(e)(1)(ii) of Regulation S-K for purposes of this Stock
Performance Graph. In our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2021, we included a peer group index as our
selected index under Item 201(e)(1)(ii). Accordingly, as required
under Item 201(e)(4) of Regulation S-K, we have also included the
total stockholder return of a peer group in the Stock Performance
Graph below, which consists of the following companies: PayPal
Holdings, Inc., MasterCard Incorporated, Synchrony Financial,
Discover Financial Services, Fifth Third Bancorp, Key Corp,
Citizens Financial Group, Inc., Ally Financial Inc., M&T Bank
Corporation, Regions Financial Corporation, Huntington Bancshares
Incorporated, Comerica Incorporated, SVB Financial Group and
Capital One
Financial Corporation. This peer group is the same as the peer
group used in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2021, except for the removal of Santander Consumer USA
Holdings Inc., which was the subject of a take-private transaction
in January 2022.
The Stock Performance Graph assumes that $100 was invested in our
common stock and each index, and that all dividends were
reinvested. For the purpose of this Stock Performance Graph,
historical stock prices have been adjusted to reflect the impact of
the spinoff of LVI on November 5, 2021. The stock price
performance on the graph below is not necessarily indicative of
future performance.
Effective March 23, 2022, we changed our corporate name to Bread
Financial Holdings, Inc. from Alliance Data Systems Corporation,
and on April 4, 2022, we changed our ticker to “BFH” from “ADS” on
the NYSE.
Copyright© 2022 Standard & Poor’s, a division of S&P
Global. All rights reserved
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. |
|
S&P 500 Index |
|
S&P Financial Index |
|
2022 Peer Group Index |
December 31, 2017 |
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
December 31, 2018 |
59.98 |
|
|
95.62 |
|
|
86.97 |
|
|
98.31 |
|
December 31, 2019 |
45.92 |
|
|
125.72 |
|
|
114.91 |
|
|
141.60 |
|
December 31, 2020 |
31.08 |
|
|
148.85 |
|
|
112.96 |
|
|
184.87 |
|
December 31, 2021 |
35.39 |
|
|
191.58 |
|
|
152.54 |
|
|
196.11 |
|
December 31, 2022 |
20.37 |
|
|
156.89 |
|
|
136.48 |
|
|
145.48 |
|
Our future filings with the SEC may “incorporate information by
reference,” including this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Unless we
specifically state otherwise, this Stock Performance Graph shall
not be deemed to be incorporated by reference and shall not
constitute soliciting material or otherwise be considered filed
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Item 6. [Reserved]
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(MD&A).
The following discussion and analysis of our results of operations
and financial condition should be read in conjunction with our
audited consolidated financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Some of the
information contained in this discussion and analysis constitutes
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
Actual results could differ materially from those discussed in
these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or
contribute to these differences include, but are not limited to,
those discussed below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form
10-K particularly under “Risk Factors” and “Cautionary Note
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” Unless otherwise specified,
references to Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements are to
the Notes to our audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of
December 31, 2022 and 2021 and for years ended
December 31, 2022,
2021 and 2020.
OVERVIEW
We are a tech-forward financial services company that provides
simple, personalized payment, lending and saving solutions. We
create opportunities for our customers and partners through
digitally enabled choices that offer ease, empowerment, financial
flexibility and exceptional customer experiences. Driven by a
digital-first approach, data insights and white-label technology,
we deliver growth for our partners through a comprehensive product
suite, including private label and co-brand credit cards and buy
now, pay later products such as installment loans and our
“split-pay” offerings. We also offer direct-to-consumer solutions
that give customers more access, choice and freedom through our
branded Bread CashbackTM
American Express®
Credit Card and Bread SavingsTM
products.
Effective March 23, 2022, we changed our corporate name to Bread
Financial Holdings, Inc. from Alliance Data Systems Corporation,
and on April 4, 2022, we changed our ticker to “BFH” from “ADS” on
the NYSE. Neither the name change nor the NYSE ticker change
affected our legal entity structure, nor did either change have an
impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. On
November 5, 2021, our former LoyaltyOne segment was spun off
into an independent public company Loyalty Ventures Inc. (traded on
The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC under the ticker “LYLT”) and therefore
is reflected herein as Discontinued Operations. Our primary source
of revenue is from Interest and fees on loans from our various
credit card and other loan products, and to a lesser extent from
contractual relationships with our brand partners.
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
We prepare our Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP). However, certain information included within this
Annual Report on Form 10-K, constitutes non-GAAP financial
measures. Our calculations of non-GAAP financial measures may
differ from the calculations of similarly titled measures by other
companies. In particular,
Pretax pre-provision earnings
(PPNR) is calculated by increasing/decreasing Income from
continuing operations before income taxes by the net
provision/release in Provision for credit losses. We use PPNR as a
metric to evaluate our results of operations before income taxes,
excluding the volatility that can occur within Provision for credit
losses.
Tangible common equity over Tangible assets
(TCE/TA) represents Total stockholders’ equity reduced by Goodwill
and intangible assets, net, (TCE) divided by Tangible assets (TA),
which is Total assets reduced by Goodwill and intangible assets,
net. We use TCE/TA as a metric to evaluate the Company’s capital
adequacy and estimate its ability to cover potential losses.
Tangible book value per common share
represents TCE divided by shares outstanding. We use Tangible book
value per common share as a metric to estimate the Company’s
potential value in relation to tangible assets per share. We
believe the use of these non-GAAP financial measures provide
additional clarity in understanding our results of operations and
trends. For a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures
to the most directly comparable GAAP measures, please see “Table 6:
Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures” that
follows.
BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT
This Business Environment section provides an overview of our
results of operations and financial position for 2022, as well as
our related outlook for 2023 and certain of the uncertainties
associated with achieving that outlook. This section should be read
in conjunction with the other information appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K, including “Consolidated Results of
Operations”, “Risk Factors”, and “Cautionary Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements”, which provides further discussion of
variances in our results of operations over the years of
comparison, along with other factors that could impact future
results and the Company achieving its outlook.
2022 was a transformational year in which we rebranded to Bread
Financial Holdings, Inc. in March, and executed on our strategic
objectives, including expanding our product offerings with the
launch of the Bread CashbackTM
American Express®
Credit Card, securing new diverse program agreements and long-term
renewals with iconic brands, and advancing our technology
modernization through major enhancements to our core platform and
surrounding digital assets.
Credit sales of $32.9 billion were up 11% when compared with 2021,
driven by organic growth from our existing brand partners, as well
as the addition of our new brand partners and new product
offerings. Average credit card and other loans of $17.8 billion
grew 13%, with End-of-period loan balances up 23%. Growth in Total
net interest and non-interest income of 17% exceeded the growth in
average Credit card and other loans, compared with 2021; in
particular Total interest income increased from the prior year due
to higher average loan balances and improved loan yields.
Interchange revenue, net of retailer share arrangements increased
year-over-year due in part to cardholder and brand partner
engagement initiatives, as well as increases in our brand partners’
share of the economics under new retailer share arrangements, while
Other non-interest income decreased primarily due to the write-down
of our equity method investment in LVI. Total non-interest expenses
increased 15%, driven by portfolio growth and ongoing investments
in technology modernization, digital advancement, marketing and
product innovation.
Provision for credit losses increased relative to 2021 as a result
of a reserve build due to the increase in End-of-period loan
balances, including through the acquisition of new portfolios in
the year, increased net principal losses and a higher reserve rate.
Our Allowance for credit losses increased, with a reserve rate of
11.5% as of December 31, 2022, relative to 10.5% as of
December 31, 2021. The reserve rate increased due to continued
elevated inflation, increasing consumer debt levels and weakening
in macroeconomic indicators, negatively affecting our base case
scenario outlook, which was partially offset by the addition of
higher quality portfolios throughout the year.
Overall, Income from continuing operations of $224 million was
down 72% compared with 2021, reflecting a higher Provision for
credit losses as discussed previously. We remained disciplined,
generating more than 200 basis points of operating leverage for the
year, as we managed our expenses in alignment with our revenue and
growth outlook, while continuing to invest in our future. We also
strengthened our balance sheet and bolstered our financial
resilience through greater product and funding diversification, and
growth in capital and increased tangible book value.
Our 2023 financial outlook assumes a more challenging macroeconomic
landscape. We are closely monitoring the impact of inflation,
rising interest rates and other macroeconomic factors on our
consumers and partners, which remain difficult to predict and
therefore could have an impact on our 2023 outlook. We are
experiencing a shift toward non-discretionary spending with payment
rates approaching pre-pandemic levels and expecting the
unemployment rate to gradually move to the mid-to-upper 4% range by
year-end 2023. Our outlook assumes additional interest rate
increases by the Federal Reserve Board which will result in a
nominal benefit to Net interest income.
Our outlook for growth in Average credit card and other loans in
2023, based on our new and renewed brand partner announcements,
visibility into our pipeline, the sale of BJ’s, and the current
economic outlook, is in the mid-single digit range relative to
2022. For the year ended December 31, 2022, BJ’s branded
co-brand accounts generated approximately 10% of Total net interest
and non-interest income. As of December 31, 2022, BJ’s branded
co-brand accounts were responsible for approximately 11% of Total
credit card and other loans. We expect Total net interest and
non-interest income growth for 2023, excluding the BJ’s portfolio
gain on sale, to be aligned with growth in Average credit card and
other loans; with a full year 2023 Net interest margin expected to
be consistent with the 2022 full year rate of 19.2%.
In 2023, as a result of ongoing investments in technology
modernization, digital advancement, marketing, and product
innovation, along with continued portfolio growth, we anticipate an
increase in Total non-interest expenses relative to 2022. We remain
focused on delivering nominal positive operating leverage for 2023
as we manage the pace and timing of our investments to align with
our full year revenue and growth outlook.
Our 2023 financial outlook also assumes a net loss rate of
approximately 7%, inclusive of impacts from the 2022 transition of
our credit card processing services as well as continued pressure
on consumers’ ability to pay due to persistent
inflation.
Although we recognize the more challenging macroeconomic landscape,
we remain focused on executing on our strategic priorities and
making the investments that position us to drive sustainable,
profitable growth.
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion provides commentary on the variances in
our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2022,
compared with the year ended December 31, 2021, as presented in the
accompanying tables. This discussion should be read in conjunction
with the discussion under “Business Environment”, above. For a
discussion of the financial condition and results of operations for
2021 compared with 2020, please refer to Part II, Item 7.
“Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations (MD&A)” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2021, filed with the SEC on
February 25, 2022, which discussion is incorporated herein by
reference.
Table 1: Summary of Our Financial Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
|
2022
to 2021 |
|
2021
to 2020 |
|
2022
to 2021 |
|
2021
to 2020 |
(Millions, except per share amounts and percentages) |
Total net interest and non-interest income |
$ |
3,826 |
|
|
$ |
3,272 |
|
|
$ |
3,298 |
|
|
$ |
554 |
|
|
$ |
(26) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
(1) |
|
Provision for credit losses |
1,594 |
|
|
544 |
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
(722) |
|
|
193 |
|
|
(57) |
|
Total non-interest expenses |
1,932 |
|
|
1,684 |
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
248 |
|
|
(47) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
(3) |
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
300 |
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
301 |
|
|
(744) |
|
|
743 |
|
|
(71) |
|
|
nm |
Provision for income taxes |
76 |
|
|
247 |
|
|
93 |
|
|
(171) |
|
|
154 |
|
|
(69) |
|
|
168 |
|
Income from continuing operations |
224 |
|
|
797 |
|
|
208 |
|
|
(573) |
|
|
589 |
|
|
(72) |
|
|
nm |
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income
taxes |
(1) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
(5) |
|
|
(2) |
|
|
(111) |
|
|
(38) |
|
Net income |
223 |
|
|
801 |
|
|
214 |
|
|
(578) |
|
|
587 |
|
|
(72) |
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per diluted share |
$ |
4.46 |
|
|
$ |
16.02 |
|
|
$ |
4.46 |
|
|
$ |
(11.56) |
|
|
$ |
11.56 |
|
|
(72) |
|
|
nm |
Income from continuing operations per diluted share |
$ |
4.47 |
|
|
$ |
15.95 |
|
|
$ |
4.35 |
|
|
$ |
(11.48) |
|
|
$ |
11.60 |
|
|
(72) |
|
|
nm |
Net interest margin
(1)
|
19.2 |
% |
|
18.2 |
% |
|
16.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
1.4 |
|
Return on average equity
(2)
|
9.8 |
% |
|
40.7 |
% |
|
16.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
(30.9) |
|
|
24.0 |
|
Effective income tax rate - continuing operations |
25.4 |
% |
|
23.7 |
% |
|
30.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
(7.0) |
|
______________________________
(1)Net
interest margin represents annualized Net interest income divided
by average Total interest-earning assets. See also
Table 5: Net Interest Margin.
(2)Return
on average equity represents annualized Income from continuing
operations divided by average Total stockholders’
equity.
(nm)
Not meaningful
Table 2: Summary of Total Net Interest and Non-interest Income,
After Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
|
2022
to 2021 |
|
2021
to 2020 |
|
2022
to 2021 |
|
2021
to 2020 |
(Millions, except percentages) |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans |
$ |
4,615 |
|
|
$ |
3,861 |
|
|
$ |
3,931 |
|
|
$ |
754 |
|
|
$ |
(70) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
(2) |
|
Interest on cash and investment securities |
69 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
62 |
|
|
(14) |
|
|
nm |
|
(64) |
|
Total interest income |
4,684 |
|
|
3,868 |
|
|
3,952 |
|
|
816 |
|
|
(84) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
(2) |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits |
243 |
|
|
167 |
|
|
238 |
|
|
76 |
|
|
(71) |
|
|
46 |
|
|
(30) |
|
Interest on borrowings |
260 |
|
|
216 |
|
|
261 |
|
|
44 |
|
|
(45) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
(18) |
|
Total interest expense |
503 |
|
|
383 |
|
|
499 |
|
|
120 |
|
|
(116) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
(23) |
|
Net interest income |
4,181 |
|
|
3,485 |
|
|
3,453 |
|
|
696 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
1 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interchange revenue, net of retailer share arrangements |
(469) |
|
|
(369) |
|
|
(332) |
|
|
(100) |
|
|
(37) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
11 |
|
Other |
114 |
|
|
156 |
|
|
177 |
|
|
(42) |
|
|
(21) |
|
|
(27) |
|
|
(12) |
|
Total non-interest income |
(355) |
|
|
(213) |
|
|
(155) |
|
|
(142) |
|
|
(58) |
|
|
66 |
|
|
38 |
|
Total net interest and non-interest income |
3,826 |
|
|
3,272 |
|
|
3,298 |
|
|
554 |
|
|
(26) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
(1) |
|
Provision for credit losses |
1,594 |
|
|
544 |
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
(722) |
|
|
193 |
|
|
(57) |
|
Total net interest and non-interest income, after provision for
credit losses |
$ |
2,232 |
|
|
$ |
2,728 |
|
|
$ |
2,032 |
|
|
$ |
(496) |
|
|
$ |
696 |
|
|
(18) |
|
|
34 |
|
______________________________
(nm)
Not meaningful
Total Net Interest and Non-interest Income, After Provision for
Credit Losses
Interest income:
Total interest income increased for the year ended
December 31, 2022, primarily resulting from Interest and fees
on loans. The increase during the period, relative to the prior
year, was due to increases in Average credit card and other loans
driven by new originations and moderation in the consumer payment
rate, as well as an increase in finance charge yields of
approximately 131 basis points.
Interest expense:
Total interest expense increased for the year ended
December 31, 2022, due to the following:
•Interest
on deposits
increased $76 million due to higher average interest rates which
increased interest expense by approximately $72 million, as
well as higher average balances which increased interest expense by
$4 million.
•Interest
on borrowings
increased $44 million due to higher interest rates which increased
funding costs $72 million, offset by lower average borrowings
which decreased funding costs by approximately
$28 million.
Non-interest income:
Total non-interest income increased for the year ended
December 31, 2022, due to the following:
•Interchange
revenue, net of retailer share arrangements
increased due to cardholder and brand partner engagement
initiatives, as well as increases in our brand partners’ share of
the economics under new retailer share arrangements, partially
offset by fees earned from increased credit sales.
•Other
decreased primarily due to the write-down of our equity method
investment in LVI of $44 million.
Provision for credit losses
increased for the year ended December 31, 2022, due primarily
to a reserve build of $626 million, driven by a 23% higher
End-of-period loan balance, higher net principal losses, and a
higher reserve rate due to economic scenario weightings in our
credit reserve modeling as a result of weakening in macroeconomic
indicators, elevated inflation, and the increased cost of overall
consumer debt.
Table 3: Summary of Total Non-interest Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
|
2022
to 2021 |
|
2021
to 2020 |
|
2022
to 2021 |
|
2021
to 2020 |
(Millions, except percentages) |
|
Non-interest expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits |
$ |
779 |
|
|
$ |
671 |
|
|
$ |
609 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
10 |
|
Card and processing expenses |
359 |
|
|
323 |
|
|
396 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
(73) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
(18) |
|
Information processing and communication |
274 |
|
|
216 |
|
|
191 |
|
|
58 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
27 |
|
|
13 |
|
Marketing expenses |
180 |
|
|
160 |
|
|
143 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
12 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
113 |
|
|
92 |
|
|
106 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
(14) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
(13) |
|
Other |
227 |
|
|
222 |
|
|
286 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
(64) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
(23) |
|
Total non-interest expenses |
$ |
1,932 |
|
|
$ |
1,684 |
|
|
$ |
1,731 |
|
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
$ |
(47) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
(3) |
|
Total Non-interest Expenses
Non-interest expenses:
Total non-interest expenses increased for the year ended
December 31, 2022, due to the following:
•Employee
compensation and benefits
increased due to increased salaries, contract labor, which itself
was driven by continued digital and technology
modernization-related hiring, and incentive compensation, as well
as higher volume-related staffing levels.
•Card
and processing expenses
increased due to higher volumes, primarily related to the
acquisition of the AAA credit card portfolio, and higher fraud
losses.
•Information
processing and communication
increased due to an increase in data processing expense driven by
the transition of our credit card processing services.
•Marketing
expenses
increased due to increased spending associated with higher sales
and brand partner joint marketing campaigns, as well as on
expanding our new brand, products and direct-to-consumer
offerings.
•Depreciation
and amortization
increased due to increased amortization for developed technology
associated with the Lon Inc. acquisition, which was completed in
December 2020.
Income Taxes
Provision for income taxes decreased for the year ended
December 31, 2022, primarily related to a $744 million
decrease in Income from continuing operations before income taxes
in 2022. The effective tax rate for the year ended
December 31, 2022 was 25.4% as compared to 23.7% for the year
ended December 31, 2021. The 2022 effective tax rate was
unfavorably impacted by lower Income from continuing operations
before income taxes and an increase to the deferred tax asset
valuation allowance, offset by favorable settlements with tax
authorities. The lower effective tax rate in 2021 included a
discrete tax benefit related to a favorable settlement with a state
tax authority and a discrete tax benefit triggered by the
divestiture of our former LoyaltyOne segment.
Table 4: Summary Financial Highlights – Continuing
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or for the Years Ended December 31, |
|
% Change |
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
|
2022
to 2021 |
|
2021
to 2020 |
(Millions, except per share amounts and percentages) |
|
Credit sales |
$ |
32,883 |
|
|
$ |
29,603 |
|
|
$ |
24,707 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
20 |
|
PPNR(1)
|
1,894 |
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
1,567 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
1 |
|
Average credit card and other loans |
17,768 |
|
|
15,656 |
|
|
16,367 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
(4) |
|
End-of-period credit card and other loans |
21,365 |
|
|
17,399 |
|
|
16,784 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
4 |
|
End-of-period direct-to-consumer deposits |
5,466 |
|
|
3,180 |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
72 |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets(2)
|
1.0 |
% |
|
3.6 |
% |
|
0.9 |
% |
|
(2.6) |
|
|
2.7 |
|
Return on average equity(3)
|
9.8 |
% |
|
40.7 |
% |
|
16.7 |
% |
|
(30.9) |
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin(4)
|
19.2 |
% |
|
18.2 |
% |
|
16.8 |
% |
|
1.0 |
|
|
1.4 |
|
Loan yield(5)
|
26.0 |
% |
|
24.7 |
% |
|
24.0 |
% |
|
1.3 |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency ratio(6)
|
50.5 |
% |
|
51.5 |
% |
|
52.5 |
% |
|
(1.0) |
|
|
(1.0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity / Tangible assets ratio
(TCE/TA)(7)
|
6.0 |
% |
|
6.6 |
% |
|
3.7 |
% |
|
(0.6) |
|
|
2.9 |
|
Tangible book value per common share
(8)
|
$ |
29.42 |
|
|
$ |
28.09 |
|
|
$ |
16.34 |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
71.9 |
|
Cash dividend per common share |
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
|
— |
|
|
(33.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment rate(9)
|
16.4 |
% |
|
17.2 |
% |
|
16.2 |
% |
|
(0.8) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delinquency rate(10)
|
5.5 |
% |
|
3.9 |
% |
|
4.4 |
% |
|
1.6 |
|
|
(0.5) |
|
Net loss rate(10)
|
5.4 |
% |
|
4.6 |
% |
|
6.6 |
% |
|
0.8 |
|
|
(2.0) |
|
Reserve rate |
11.5 |
% |
|
10.5 |
% |
|
12.0 |
% |
|
1.0 |
|
|
(1.5) |
|
______________________________
(1)PPNR,
is calculated by increasing/decreasing Income from continuing
operations before income taxes by the net provision/release in
Provision for credit losses. PPNR is a non-GAAP financial measure.
See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” and
Table 6: Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial
Measures.
(2)Return
on average assets represents annualized Income from continuing
operations divided by average Total assets.
(3)Return
on average equity represents annualized Income from continuing
operations divided by average Total stockholders’
equity.
(4)Net
interest margin represents annualized Net interest income divided
by average Total interest-earning assets. See also
Table 5: Net Interest Margin.
(5)Loan
yield represents annualized Interest and fees on loans divided by
Average credit card and other loans.
(6)Efficiency
ratio represents Total non-interest expenses divided by Total net
interest and non-interest income.
(7)Tangible
common equity (TCE) represents Total stockholders’ equity reduced
by Goodwill and intangible assets, net. Tangible assets (TA)
represents Total assets reduced by Goodwill and intangible assets,
net. TCE/TA is a non-GAAP financial measure. See “Non-GAAP
Financial Measures” and
Table 6: Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial
Measures.
(8)Tangible
book value per common share represents TCE divided by shares
outstanding and is a non-GAAP financial measure. See “Non-GAAP
Financial Measures” and
Table 6: Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial
Measures.
(9)Payment
rate represents consumer payments during the last month of the
period, divided by the beginning-of-month credit card and other
loans, including held for sale in applicable periods.
(10)Delinquency
and Net loss rates as of or for the year ended December 31,
2022 were impacted by the transition of our credit card processing
services.
Table 5: Net Interest Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2022 |
|
Average Balance* |
|
Interest Income / Expense |
|
Average Yield / Rate |
(Millions, except percentages) |
|
Cash and investment securities |
$ |
3,954 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
1.75 |
% |
Credit card and other loans |
17,768 |
|
|
4,615 |
|
|
25.97 |
% |
Total interest-earning assets |
21,722 |
|
|
4,684 |
|
|
21.56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct-to-consumer (retail) deposits |
4,342 |
|
|
81 |
|
|
1.87 |
% |
Wholesale deposits |
7,358 |
|
|
162 |
|
|
2.21 |
% |
Interest-bearing deposits |
11,700 |
|
|
243 |
|
|
2.08 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured borrowings |
5,089 |
|
|
153 |
|
|
2.99 |
% |
Unsecured borrowings |
1,966 |
|
|
107 |
|
|
5.46 |
% |
Interest-bearing borrowings |
7,055 |
|
|
260 |
|
|
3.68 |
% |
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
18,755 |
|
|
503 |
|
|
2.68 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
$ |
4,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (NIM)(1)
|
|
|
19.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2021 |
|
Average Balance* |
|
Interest Income / Expense |
|
Average Yield / Rate |
(Millions, except percentages) |
|
Cash and investment securities |
$ |
3,480 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
0.21 |
% |
Credit card and other loans |
15,656 |
|
|
3,861 |
|
|
24.66 |
% |
Total interest-earning assets |
19,136 |
|
|
3,868 |
|
|
20.21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct-to-consumer deposits (retail) |
2,490 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
0.91 |
% |
Wholesale deposits |
7,509 |
|
|
144 |
|
|
1.92 |
% |
Interest-bearing deposits |
9,999 |
|
|
167 |
|
|
1.67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured borrowings |
4,596 |
|
|
112 |
|
|
2.43 |
% |
Unsecured borrowings |
2,699 |
|
|
104 |
|
|
3.84 |
% |
Interest-bearing borrowings |
7,295 |
|
|
216 |
|
|
2.95 |
% |
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
17,294 |
|
|
383 |
|
|
2.21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
$ |
3,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (NIM)(1)
|
|
|
18.2 |
% |
|
|
______________________________
(1)Net
interest margin represents annualized Net interest income divided
by average Total interest-earning assets.
Table 6: Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial
Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
% Change |
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
|
2022
to 2021 |
|
2021
to 2020 |
(Millions, except percentages) |
|
Pretax pre-provision earnings (PPNR) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
1,044 |
|
|
$ |
301 |
|
|
(71) |
|
|
nm |
Provision for credit losses |
1,594 |
|
|
544 |
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
193 |
|
|
(57) |
|
Pretax pre-provision earnings (PPNR) |
$ |
1,894 |
|
|
$ |
1,588 |
|
|
$ |
1,567 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity (TCE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity |
$ |
2,265 |
|
|
$ |
2,086 |
|
|
$ |
1,522 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
37 |
|
Less: Goodwill and intangible assets, net |
(799) |
|
|
(687) |
|
|
(710) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
(3) |
|
Tangible common equity (TCE) |
$ |
1,466 |
|
|
$ |
1,399 |
|
|
$ |
812 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible assets (TA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
$ |
25,407 |
|
|
$ |
21,746 |
|
|
$ |
22,547 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
(4) |
|
Less: Goodwill and intangible assets, net |
(799) |
|
|
(687) |
|
|
(710) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
(3) |
|
Tangible assets (TA) |
$ |
24,608 |
|
|
$ |
21,059 |
|
|
$ |
21,837 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
(4) |
|
______________________________
(nm)
Not meaningful
ASSET QUALITY
Given the nature of our business, the quality of our assets, in
particular our Credit card and other loans, is a key determinant
underlying our ongoing financial performance and overall financial
condition. When it comes to our Credit card and other loans
portfolio, we closely monitor two metrics – Delinquency rates and
Net principal loss rates – which reflect, among other factors, our
underwriting, the inherent credit risk in our portfolio, the
success of our collection and recovery efforts, and more broadly,
the general macroeconomic conditions.
Delinquencies:
An account is contractually delinquent if we do not receive the
minimum payment due by the specified due date. Our policy is to
continue to accrue interest and fee income on all accounts, except
in limited circumstances, until the balance and all related
interest and fees are paid or charged-off. After an account becomes
30 days past due, a proprietary collection scoring algorithm
automatically scores the risk of the account becoming further
delinquent; based upon the level of risk indicated, a collection
strategy is deployed. If after exhausting all in-house collection
efforts we are unable to collect on the account, we may engage
collection agencies or outside attorneys to continue those efforts,
or sell the charged-off balances.
The Delinquency rate is calculated by dividing outstanding balances
that are contractually delinquent (i.e., balances greater than 30
days past due) as of the end of the period, by the outstanding
principal amount of credit cards and other loans as of the same
period-end.
The following table presents the delinquency trends on our Credit
card and other loans portfolio based on the principal balances
outstanding as of December 31:
Table 7: Delinquency Trends on Credit Card and Other
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 |
|
% of
Total |
|
2021 |
|
% of
Total |
(Millions, except percentages) |
|
Credit card and other loans outstanding ─ principal |
$ |
20,107 |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
16,590 |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Outstanding balances contractually delinquent:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 to 60 days |
$ |
366 |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
61 to 90 days |
231 |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
147 |
|
|
0.9 |
|
91 or more days |
515 |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
281 |
|
|
1.7 |
|
Total |
$ |
1,112 |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
$ |
647 |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
______________________________
(1)As
of December 31, 2022 the Outstanding balances contractually
delinquent, and the related % of Total (i.e., the Delinquency
rate), were impacted by the transition of our credit card
processing services.
As part of our collections strategy, we may offer temporary, short
term (six-months or less) loan modifications in order to improve
the likelihood of collections and meet the needs of our customers.
Our modifications for customers who have requested assistance and
meet certain qualifying requirements, come in the form of reduced
or deferred payment requirements, interest rate reductions and late
fee waivers. We do not offer programs involving the forgiveness of
principal. These temporary loan modifications may assist in cases
where we believe the customer will recover from the short-term
hardship and resume scheduled payments. Under these forbearance
modification programs, those accounts receiving relief may not
advance to the next delinquency cycle, including charge-off, in the
same time frame that would have occurred had the relief not been
granted. We evaluate our loan modification programs to determine if
they represent a more than insignificant delay in payment, in which
case they would then be considered a troubled debt restructuring.
For additional information, see Note 2 “Credit Card and Other Loans
– Modified Credit Card Loans”, to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Net Principal Losses:
Our net principal losses include the principal amount of losses
that are deemed uncollectible, less recoveries, and exclude
charged-off interest, fees and third-party fraud losses (including
synthetic fraud). Charged-off interest and fees reduce Interest and
fees on loans while third-party fraud losses are recorded in Card
and processing expenses. Credit card loans, including unpaid
interest and fees, are generally charged-off in the month during
which an account becomes 180 days past due. BNPL loans, including
unpaid interest, are generally charged-off when a loan becomes 120
days past due. However, in the case of a customer bankruptcy or
death, credit card and other loans, including unpaid interest and
fees, as applicable, are charged-off in each month subsequent to 60
days after receipt of the notification of the bankruptcy or death,
but in no case longer than 180 days past due for credit card loans
and 120 days past due for BNPL loans.
The net principal loss rate is calculated by dividing net principal
losses for the period by the Average credit card and other loans
for the same period. Average credit card and other loans represent
the average balance of the loans at the beginning and end of each
month, averaged over the periods indicated. The following table
presents our net principal losses for the years ended December
31:
Table 8: Net Principal Losses on Credit Card and Other
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
(Millions, except percentages) |
|
Average credit card and other loans |
$ |
17,768 |
|
|
$ |
15,656 |
|
|
$ |
16,367 |
|
Net principal losses |
968 |
|
|
720 |
|
|
1,083 |
|
Net principal losses as a percentage of average credit card and
other loans(1)
|
5.4 |
% |
|
4.6 |
% |
|
6.6 |
% |
______________________________
(1)Net
principal losses as a percentage of Average credit card and other
loans for the year ended December 31, 2022 was impacted by the
transition of our credit card processing services.
CONSOLIDATED LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We maintain a strong focus on liquidity and capital. Our funding,
liquidity and capital policies are designed to ensure that our
business has the liquidity and capital resources necessary to
support our daily operations, our business growth, our credit
ratings related to our secured financings, and meet our regulatory
and policy requirements (including capital and leverage ratio
requirements applicable to CB and CCB under FDIC regulations) in a
cost effective and prudent manner through expected and unexpected
market environments.
Our primary sources of liquidity include cash generated from
operating activities, our Credit Agreement and issuances of debt
securities, and our securitization programs and deposits issued by
the Banks, in addition to our ongoing efforts to renew and expand
our various sources of liquidity.
Our primary uses of liquidity are for ongoing and varied lending
operations, scheduled payments of principal and interest on our
debt, operational expenses, capital expenditures, including digital
and product innovation and technology enhancements, and
dividends.
We may from time to time seek to retire or purchase our outstanding
debt through cash purchases or exchanges for other securities, in
open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or
otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges would depend on prevailing
market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual
restrictions and other factors, and may be funded through the
issuance of debt securities. The amounts involved may be
material.
We will also need additional financing in the future to repay or
refinance the existing debt at maturity or otherwise and to fund
our growth. Given the maturities of our current outstanding debt
and the current macroeconomic conditions, it is possible that we
will be required to repay or refinance some or all of our maturing
debt in volatile and/or unfavorable markets.
Because of the alternatives available to us as discussed above, we
believe our short-term and long-term sources of liquidity are
adequate to fund not only our current operations, but also our
near-term and long-term funding requirements including dividend
payments, debt service obligations and repayment of debt maturities
and other amounts that may ultimately be paid in connection with
contingencies. However, the adequacy of our liquidity could be
impacted by various factors, including macroeconomic conditions and
volatility in the financial and capital markets, limiting our
access to or increasing our cost of capital, which could make
capital unavailable or available on terms that are unfavorable to
us. These factors could significantly reduce our financial
flexibility and cause us to contract or not grow our business,
which could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations and financial condition.
Funding Sources
Credit Agreement
Parent Company, as borrower, and certain of our non-Bank
wholly-owned subsidiaries, as guarantors, are party to our Credit
Agreement with various agents and lenders dated June 14, 2017, as
amended.
As of December 31, 2022, we had $556 million aggregate
principal amount of term loans outstanding and a $750 million
revolving line of credit under the Credit Agreement; we had no
borrowings on our revolving line of credit. The Credit Agreement
matures on July 1, 2024.
The Credit Agreement includes various restrictive financial and
non-financial covenants. If we do not comply with these covenants,
the maturity of amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement may
be accelerated and become payable and the associated commitments
may be terminated. As of December 31, 2022, we were in
compliance with all financial covenants under the Credit
Agreement.
The Credit Agreement was amended in December 2022 to index
borrowings to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) with the
discontinuation of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). SOFR
is based on short-term repurchase agreements that are backed by
Treasury securities.
Deposits
We utilize a variety of deposit products to finance our operating
activities, including funding for our non-securitized credit card
and other loans, and to fund the securitization enhancement
requirements of the Banks. We offer both direct-to-consumer retail
deposit products as well as deposits sourced through contractual
arrangements with various financial counterparties (often referred
to as wholesale or brokered deposits). Across both our retail and
wholesale deposits, the Banks offer various non-maturity deposit
products that are generally redeemable on demand by the customer,
and as such have no scheduled maturity date; the Banks also issue
certificates of deposit with scheduled maturity dates ranging
between January 2023 and December 2027, in denominations of at
least $1,000, on which interest is paid either monthly or at
maturity.
The following table summarizes our retail and wholesale deposit
products by type and associated attributes, as of December 31,
2022 and December 31, 2021:
Table 9: Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2022 |
|
December 31, 2021 |
(Millions, except percentages) |
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
Direct-to-consumer (retail) |
$ |
5,466 |
|
|
$ |
3,180 |
|
Wholesale |
8,321 |
|
|
7,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-maturity deposit products |
|
|
|
Non-maturity deposits |
$ |
6,736 |
|
|
$ |
5,586 |
|
Interest rate range |
0.70% - 4.70% |
|
0.05% - 3.50% |
Weighted-average interest rate |
2.56 |
% |
|
0.68 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
$ |
7,051 |
|
|
$ |
5,441 |
|
Interest rate range |
0.40% - 4.95% |
|
0.20% - 3.75% |
Weighted-average interest rate |
3.11 |
% |
|
1.91 |
% |
Securitization Programs and Conduit Facilities
We sell a majority of the credit card loans originated by the Banks
to certain of our master trusts (the Trusts). These securitization
programs are a principal vehicle through which we finance the
Banks’ credit card loans. We use a combination of public term
asset-backed notes and private conduit facilities for this purpose.
During the year ended December 31, 2022, $1.6 billion of
asset-backed term notes matured and were repaid, of which
$74 million were previously retained by us and therefore
eliminated from the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
During the year ended December 31, 2022, we obtained increased
lender commitments under our private conduit facilities of $2.1
billion and extended the various maturities to June 2023 and July
2023. As of December 31, 2022, total capacity under the
conduit facilities was $6.5 billion, of which $6.1 billion had
been drawn and was included in Debt issued by consolidated variable
interest entities (VIEs) in the Consolidated Balance
Sheet.
In April 2022, the World Financial Network Credit Card Master Trust
III amended its 2009-VFC conduit facility, increasing the capacity
from $225 million to $275 million and extending the
maturity to July 2023. In addition, in April 2022, the World
Financial Capital Master Note Trust amended its 2009-VFN conduit
facility, increasing the capacity from $1.5 billion to
$2.5 billion and extending the maturity to July 2023. In June
2022, the Comenity Capital Asset Securitization Trust was formed
for the purpose of funding a portfolio acquisition completed in
October 2022. The capacity was negotiated to be $1.0 billion
and the maturity was set as June 2023.
As of December 31, 2022, we had approximately $15.4 billion of
securitized credit card loans. Securitizations require credit
enhancements in the form of cash, spread deposits, additional loans
and subordinated classes. The credit enhancement is
principally based on the outstanding balances of the series issued
by the Trusts and by the performance of the credit card loans in
the Trusts.
The following table shows the maturities of borrowing commitments
as of December 31, 2022 for the Trusts by year:
Table 10: Borrowing Commitment Maturities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023 |
|
2024 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
(Millions) |
|
Conduit facilities
(1)
|
6,525 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
6,525 |
|
Total
(2)
|
$ |
6,525 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
6,525 |
|
______________________________
(1)Amount
represents borrowing capacity, not outstanding
borrowings.
(2)Total
amounts do not include $1.9 billion of debt issued by the
Trusts, which was retained by us as a credit enhancement and
therefore has been eliminated from the Total.
Early amortization events as defined within each asset-backed
securitization transaction are generally driven by asset
performance. We do not believe it is reasonably likely that an
early amortization event will occur due to asset performance.
However, if an early amortization event were declared for a Trust,
the trustee of the particular Trust would retain the interest in
the loans along with the excess spread that would otherwise be paid
to our Bank subsidiary until the investors were fully repaid. The
occurrence of an early amortization event would significantly limit
or negate our ability to securitize additional credit card
loans.
We have secured and continue to secure the necessary commitments to
fund our credit card and other loans. However, certain of these
commitments are short-term in nature and subject to renewal. There
is no guarantee that these funding sources, when they mature, will
be renewed on similar terms, or at all, as they are dependent on
the availability of the asset-backed securitization and deposit
markets at the time.
Regulation RR (Credit Risk Retention) adopted by the FDIC, the SEC,
the Federal Reserve and certain other federal regulators mandates a
minimum five percent risk retention requirement for
securitizations. Such risk retention requirements may limit our
liquidity by restricting the amount of asset-backed securities we
are able to issue or affecting the timing of future issuances of
asset-backed securities. We satisfy such risk retention
requirements by maintaining a seller’s interest calculated in
accordance with Regulation RR.
Stock Repurchase Programs
On February 28, 2022, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a
stock repurchase program to acquire up to 200,000 shares of our
outstanding common stock in the open market during the one-year
period ending on February 28, 2023. As of March 31, 2022, we had
repurchased all 200,000 shares of our common stock available under
this program for an aggregate of $12 million. Following their
repurchase, these 200,000 shares ceased to be outstanding shares of
common stock and are now treated as authorized but unissued shares
of common stock.
Dividends
For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, we paid
$43 million, $42 million and $61 million, respectively, in
dividends to our shareholders of common stock. On January 26, 2023,
our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.21
per share on our common stock, payable on March 17, 2023, to
stockholders of record at the close of business on February 10,
2023.
Contractual Obligations
In the normal course of business, we enter into various contractual
obligations that may require future cash payments, the vast
majority of which relate to deposits, debt issued by consolidated
VIEs, long-term and other debt and operating leases.
We believe that we will have access to sufficient resources to meet
these commitments.
Cash Flows
The table below summarizes our cash flow activity for the years
indicated, followed by a discussion of the variance drivers
impacting our Operating, Investing and Financing
activities:
Table 11: Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
(Millions) |
|
Total cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
$ |
1,848 |
|
|
$ |
1,543 |
|
|
$ |
1,883 |
|
Investing activities |
(5,111) |
|
|
(1,691) |
|
|
1,774 |
|
Financing activities |
3,267 |
|
|
608 |
|
|
(4,167) |
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
15 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted
cash |
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
460 |
|
|
$ |
(495) |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
primarily include net income adjusted for (i) non-cash items
included in net income, such as provision for credit losses,
depreciation and amortization, deferred taxes and other non-cash
items, and (ii) changes in the balances of operating assets and
liabilities, which can fluctuate in the normal course of business
due to the amount and timing of payments. We generated cash flows
from operating activities of $1,848 million and $1,543 million for
the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. For
the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, the net cash
provided by operating activities was primarily driven by cash
generated from net income for the period after adjusting for the
provision for credit losses.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
primarily include changes in Credit card and other loans. Cash used
in investing activities was $5,111 million and $1,691 million for
the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respective. For
the year ended December 31, 2022, the net cash used in
investing activities was primarily due to growth in credit sales
and the consequential growth in Credit card and other loans, as
well as the acquisition of credit card loan portfolios. For the
year ended December 31, 2021, the net cash used in investing
activities was primarily due to growth in Credit card and other
loans, partially offset by the sale of a credit card loan
portfolio.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
primarily include changes in deposits and long-term debt. Cash
provided by financing activities was $3,267 million and $608
million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021,
respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the net
cash provided by financing activities was primarily driven by a net
increase in deposits and net borrowings under conduit facilities.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, the net cash provided by
financing activities was driven by a net increase in deposits,
partially offset by net repayments of securitizations.
INFLATION AND SEASONALITY
Although we cannot precisely determine the impact of inflation on
our operations, we do not believe, at this time, that we have been
significantly affected by inflation. For the most part we have
relied on operating efficiencies from scale, technology
modernization and digital advancement, and expansion in lower cost
jurisdictions, in select circumstances, to offset increased costs
of employee compensation and other operating expenses. We also
recognize that a customer’s ability and willingness to repay us has
been negatively impacted by factors such as inflation, which
results in greater delinquencies that could lead to greater credit
losses, as reflected in our increased Allowance for credit losses.
If the efforts to control inflation in the U.S. and globally are
not successful and inflationary pressures continue to persist, they
could magnify the slowdown in the domestic and global economies and
increase the risk of a recession, which may adversely impact our
business, results of operations and financial
condition.
With respect to seasonality, our revenues, earnings and cash flows
are affected by increased consumer spending patterns leading up to
and including the holiday shopping period in the fourth quarter
and, to a lesser extent, during the first quarter as Credit card
and other loans are paid down.
LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY MATTERS
CB is subject to various regulatory capital requirements
administered by the State of Delaware and the FDIC. CCB is also
subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by
the FDIC, as well as the State of Utah. Failure to meet minimum
capital requirements can trigger certain mandatory and possibly
additional discretionary actions by our regulators. Under capital
adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action, both Banks must meet specific capital guidelines
that involve quantitative measures of their assets and liabilities
as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital
amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative
judgments by these regulators about components, risk weightings and
other factors. In addition, both Banks are limited in the amounts
they can pay as dividends to the Parent Company. For additional
information about legislative and regulatory matters impacting us,
see “Business–Supervision and Regulation” under Part I of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Quantitative measures, established by regulations to ensure capital
adequacy, require the Banks to maintain minimum amounts and ratios
of Tier 1 capital to average assets, and Common equity tier 1, Tier
1 capital and Total capital, all to risk weighted assets. Failure
to meet these minimum capital requirements can result in certain
mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary actions by the
Banks’ regulators that if undertaken, could have a direct material
effect on CB’s and/or CCB’s operating activities, as well as our
operating activities. Based on these regulations, as of
December 31, 2022 and 2021, each Bank met all capital
requirements to which it was subject, and maintained capital ratios
in excess of the minimums required to qualify as well capitalized.
The Banks are considered well capitalized and seek to maintain
capital levels and ratios in excess of the minimum regulatory
requirements inclusive of the 2.5% Capital Conservation Buffer. The
actual capital ratios and minimum ratios for each Bank, as well as
the Combined Banks, are as follows as of December 31,
2022:
Table 12: Capital Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
Ratio |
|
Minimum Ratio for
Capital Adequacy
Purposes |
|
Minimum Ratio to be
Well Capitalized under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions |
Comenity Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio(1)
|
18.4 |
% |
|
4.5 |
% |
|
6.5 |
% |
Tier 1 capital ratio(2)
|
18.4 |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
8.0 |
|
Total Risk-based capital ratio(3)
|
19.7 |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
10.0 |
|
Tier 1 Leverage capital ratio(4)
|
16.7 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comenity Capital Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio(1)
|
16.1 |
% |
|
4.5 |
% |
|
6.5 |
% |
Tier 1 capital ratio(2)
|
16.1 |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
8.0 |
|
Total Risk-based capital ratio(3)
|
17.4 |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
10.0 |
|
Tier 1 Leverage capital ratio(4)
|
14.9 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Banks |
|
|
|
|
|
Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio(1)
|
17.0 |
% |
|
4.5 |
% |
|
6.5 |
% |
Tier 1 capital ratio(2)
|
17.0 |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
8.0 |
|
Total Risk-based capital ratio(3)
|
18.3 |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
10.0 |
|
Tier 1 Leverage capital ratio(4)
|
15.6 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
5.0 |
|
______________________________
(1)The
Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio represents common equity tier 1
capital divided by total risk-weighted assets.
(2)The
Tier 1 capital ratio represents tier 1 capital divided by total
risk-weighted assets.
(3)The
Total Risk-based capital ratio represents total capital divided by
total risk-weighted assets.
(4)The
Tier 1 Leverage capital ratio represents tier 1 capital divided by
total average assets, after certain adjustments.
The Banks adopted the option provided by the interim final rule
issued by joint federal bank regulatory agencies, which largely
delayed the effects of CECL on their regulatory capital for two
years, until January 1, 2022, after which the effects are phased-in
over a three-year period through December 31, 2024. Under the
interim final rule, the amount of adjustments to regulatory capital
deferred until the phase-in period includes both the initial impact
of our adoption of CECL as of January 1, 2020, and 25% of
subsequent changes in our Allowance for credit losses during each
quarter of the two-year period ended December 31, 2021. In
accordance with the interim final rule, we began to phase-in these
effects on January 1, 2022.
DISCUSSION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Our discussion and analysis of our results of operations and
overall financial condition is based upon our Consolidated
Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
the accounting policies described in Note 1, “Description of
Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to our
Consolidated Financial Statements included as part of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. The preparation of Consolidated Financial
Statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. We continually evaluate our estimates and judgments in
determination of our financial position and operating results.
Estimates are based on information available as of the date of the
Consolidated Financial Statements and, accordingly, actual results
could differ from these estimates, sometimes materially. Critical
accounting estimates are defined as those that are both most
important to the portrayal of our financial position and operating
results, and require management’s most subjective judgments, which
for us is our Allowance for credit losses and Provision for income
taxes.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The Allowance for credit losses is an estimate of expected credit
losses, measured over the estimated life of our Credit card and
other loans, that considers forecasts of future economic conditions
in addition to information about past events and current
conditions. The estimate under the credit reserving methodology
referred to as the CECL model is significantly influenced by the
composition, characteristics and quality of our Credit card and
other loans portfolio, as well as the prevailing economic
conditions and forecasts utilized. The estimate of the Allowance
for credit losses includes an estimate for uncollectible principal
as well as unpaid interest and fees. Principal losses, net of
recoveries are deducted from the Allowance. Losses for unpaid
interest and fees, as well as any adjustments to the Allowance
associated with unpaid interest and fees are recorded as a
reduction to Interest and fees on loans. The Allowance is
maintained through an adjustment to the Provision for credit losses
and is evaluated quarterly for appropriateness.
In estimating our Allowance for credit losses, for each identified
group, management uses various models and estimation techniques
based on historical loss experience, current conditions, reasonable
and supportable forecasts and other relevant factors. These models
use historical data and applicable macroeconomic variables, along
with statistical analysis and behavioral relationships, to
determine expected credit performance. Our quantitative estimate of
expected credit losses under CECL is impacted by certain forecasted
economic factors. We consider the forecast used to be reasonable
and supportable over the estimated life of the credit card and
other loans, with no reversion period. In addition to the
quantitative estimate of expected credit losses, we also
incorporate qualitative adjustments for certain factors such as
Company-specific risks, changes in current economic conditions that
may not be captured in the quantitatively derived results, or other
relevant factors to ensure the Allowance for credit losses reflects
our best estimate of current expected credit losses.
Since the implementation of the CECL standard, we have maintained a
consistent approach to the forecasting of the life of loan losses
for purposes of establishing the Allowance for credit losses. The
approach involves the use of third-party projections of economic
variables, and applies those projections to their historical
correlation to losses in segments of our loan portfolio exhibiting
common risk characteristics. The level of the Allowance includes
qualitative overlays to the model output to address risks not
inherently covered by the model output, as well as
management-perceived risks in the economic environment. These
overlays have changed over the periods since implementation through
December 31, 2022 to reflect changes in the macroeconomic
environment and the impact on our loan portfolio.
If we used different assumptions in estimating current expected
credit losses, the impact on the Allowance for credit losses could
have a material effect on our consolidated financial position and
results of operations. For example, a 100 basis point increase in
the Allowance as a percentage of the amortized cost of our Credit
card and other loans could have resulted in a change of
approximately $210 million in the Allowance for credit losses
as of December 31, 2022, with a corresponding change in the
Provision for credit losses.
Income Taxes
The income tax laws of the United States, as well as its states and
municipalities in which we operate, are inherently complex; the
manners in which they apply to our facts is often open to
interpretation, and consequentially requires us to make judgments
in establishing our Provision for income taxes.
Differences between the Consolidated Financial Statements and tax
bases of assets and liabilities give rise to deferred tax assets
and liabilities, which measure the future tax effects of items
recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements and require
certain estimates and judgments, in particular with deferred tax
assets, in order to determine whether it is more likely than not
that all or a portion of the benefit of a deferred tax asset will
not be realized. In evaluating our deferred tax assets on a
quarterly basis as new facts and circumstances emerge, we analyze
and estimate the impact of future taxable income, reversing
temporary differences and available tax planning strategies.
Uncertainties can lead to changes in the ultimate realization of
our deferred tax assets.
A liability for unrecognized tax benefits, representing the
difference between a tax position taken or expected to be taken in
a tax return and the benefit recognized in the Consolidated
Financial Statements, inherently requires estimates and judgments.
A tax position is recognized only when it is more likely than not
to be sustained, based purely on its technical merits after
examination by the relevant taxing authority, and the amount
recognized is the benefit we believe is more likely than not to be
realized upon ultimate settlement. We evaluate our tax positions as
new facts and circumstances become available, making adjustments to
our unrecognized tax benefits as appropriate. Uncertainties can
mean the tax
benefits ultimately realized differ from amounts previously
recognized, with any differences recorded in Provision for income
taxes.
Our assessment of the technical merits and measurement of tax
benefits associated with uncertain tax positions is subject to a
high degree of judgment and estimation. Actual results may differ
from our current judgments due to a variety of factors, including
interpretations of law by the relevant taxing authorities that
differ from our assessments and results of tax examinations. We
believe we have adequately provided for any reasonably foreseeable
outcome related to these matters. However, our future results may
include favorable or unfavorable adjustments to our estimated tax
liabilities in the period the assessments are made or resolved, or
when statutes of limitation on potential assessments expire. As of
December 31, 2022, we had $282 million in unrecognized tax
benefits, including interest and penalties, recorded in Other
liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
See “Recently Issued Accounting Standards” under Note 1,
“Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies”, to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk.
See “Risk Management” within Item 1A.
Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data.
Our Consolidated Financial Statements begin on page F-1 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with
Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A. Controls and
Procedures.
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this
Report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such
period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective and
designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in
our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the requisite time
periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that it is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There have not been any changes in our internal control over
financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fourth quarter of 2022
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal
control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), and include those
policies and procedures that:
•Pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and dispositions of
assets;
•Provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP,
and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of our management and directors;
and
•Provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that
could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree or compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of
our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2022. In making this assessment, our management
used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in
Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013).
Based on those criteria and management’s assessment, with the
participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, we conclude that, as of December 31, 2022, our internal
control over financial reporting was effective.
The effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2022, has been audited by Deloitte &
Touche LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm who
also audited our Consolidated Financial Statements; their
attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting appears on page F-4.
Item 9B. Other Information.
None.
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign
Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and
Corporate Governance.
Incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement for the 2023
Annual Meeting of our stockholders, which will be filed with the
SEC not later than 120 days after December 31,
2022.
Item 11. Executive
Compensation.
Incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement for the 2023
Annual Meeting of our stockholders, which will be filed with the
SEC not later than 120 days after December 31,
2022.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters.
Incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement for the 2023
Annual Meeting of our stockholders, which will be filed with the
SEC not later than 120 days after December 31,
2022.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions, and Director Independence.
Incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement for the 2023
Annual Meeting of our stockholders, which will be filed with the
SEC not later than 120 days after December 31,
2022.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and
Services.
Incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement for the 2023
Annual Meeting of our stockholders, which will be filed with the
SEC not later than 120 days after December 31,
2022.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement
Schedules.
a)The
following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form
10-K:
(1)Financial
Statements
(2)Financial
Statement Schedules.
Separate financial statement schedules have been omitted either
because they are not applicable or because the required information
is included in the consolidated financial statements.
(3)Exhibits.
The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K or, where indicated, were previously filed and are hereby
incorporated by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Filer |
|
Description |
|
Form |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
3.1 |
|
(a) |
|
|
|
8-K |
|
3.2 |
|
6/10/16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|