UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-KSB
/A
(Amendment No. 1)
x
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
|
|
For
the fiscal year ended August 31, 2007
|
|
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
transition period from ______to ______
Commission
file number: 01-33522
GULF
WESTERN
PETROLEUM
CORPORATION
(Name of
small business issuer in its charter)
Nevada
|
98-0489324
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
4801
Woodway Drive, Suite 306W, Houston, Texas
|
77056
|
(Address
of principal executive office)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
|
Issuer’s telephone number
(713)
355-7001
|
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange
Act:
|
|
|
Common
Stock, $.001 par value
|
Not
Applicable
|
(Title
of Class)
|
(Name
of exchange on which registered)
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, par
value $.001 per share
Check
whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 of
15(d) of the Exchange Act.
o
Check
whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
o
Check
if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of
Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to
the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any
amendment to this Form 10-KSB.
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes
o
No
x
The issuer’s revenues for the year ended August 31, 2007 were $-0-. The
aggregate market value of the common stock, par value $.001 per share, held by
non-affiliates of the issuer as of April 21, 2008, was approximately $3,572,108.
As of April 21, 2008, there were outstanding 57,853,107 shares of common stock,
par value $.001 per share, of the issuer.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure
Format. Yes
o
No
x
Explanatory Note
The changes made to this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A include
(i) revising our risk factors to remove certain mitigating language, (ii)
clarifying our risk factor with respect to competition, (iii) clarifying the
date for which our reserves are presented, (iv) revising the corporate
governance section to provide additional information on the amount of the
professional time that our executive officers devote to our business, (v)
providing clarifying changes to tables in the executive compensation section,
(vi) revising the presentation of our consolidated financial statements and the
notes thereto with respect to the accounting for transactions with related
parties at fair value, (vii) additional information on our officers and
directors biographies and (viii) making certain other minor corrections to this
annual report.
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
|
|
Page
|
PART I
|
1
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
PART II
|
21
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
Item 7.
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
Item 8.
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
Item 8A.
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
Item 8B.
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
PART III
|
49
|
|
|
Item 9.
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
Item 10.
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
Item 11.
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
Item 12.
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
Item 13.
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
Item 14.
|
|
60
|
PART I
Forward Looking
Statements
We
caution readers that certain important factors (including without limitation
those set forth below) may affect our actual results and could cause such
results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
“Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the “Exchange Act”), made herein. We intend such forward-looking
statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking
statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995,
and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those
safe-harbor provisions. You should not rely on forward-looking statements in
this Form 10-KSB. Our forward-looking statements are based on current management
expectations that involve risks and uncertainties that may result in such
expectations not being realized. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, words such as “may,” “expect,” “believe,” “plan,” “anticipate,”
“intend,” “could,” “estimate” or “continue” are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. These statements are based on our beliefs as well as
assumptions we have
made
using information currently available to it. Some, but not all, of the factors
that may cause these differences include those discussed in “Risk
Factors.”
In particular, this Form 10-KSB contains
forward-looking statements pertaining to the following:
|
·
|
oil and natural gas production
levels;
|
|
·
|
capital expenditure
programs;
|
|
·
|
the estimated quantity of oil and
natural gas reserves;
|
|
·
|
projections of market prices and
costs;
|
|
·
|
supply and demand for oil and
natural gas;
|
|
·
|
expectations regarding the ability
to raise capital and to continually add to reserves through acquisitions,
exploration and development;
|
|
·
|
treatment under governmental
regulatory regimes;
|
|
·
|
oil and gas reserve
life.
|
The actual results could differ
materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a
result of the risk factors set forth below and elsewhere in this Form
10-KSB:
|
·
|
our ability to continue as a going
concern;
|
|
·
|
our limited history of
operations;
|
|
·
|
our need for
additional external funding;
|
|
·
|
volatility in market prices for
oil and natural gas;
|
|
·
|
liabilities inherent in oil and
natural gas operations;
|
|
·
|
uncertainties associated with
estimating oil and natural gas
reserves;
|
|
·
|
competition for, among other
things, capital, acquisitions of reserves, undeveloped lands and skilled
personnel;
|
|
·
|
incorrect assessments of the value
of acquisitions;
|
|
·
|
geological, technical, drilling
and processing problems;
|
|
·
|
fluctuations in foreign exchange
or interest rates and stock market volatility;
and
|
|
·
|
the other factors discussed under
“Risk Factors.”
|
These factors should not be considered
exhaustive.
These forward-looking statements are
made as of the date of this Form 10-KSB and we assume no obligation to update
such forward-looking statements or to update the reasons why actual results
could differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking
statements.
As we are deemed a “penny stock issuer” within the meaning of
the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, we are currently ineligible to rely on
the safe harbor provisions of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act relating
to forward-looking statements. However, once we are no longer a
“penny stock issuer,” we expect to be eligible to, and we intend to, rely on
such safe harbor provisions.
Item
1.
|
Description of
Business
|
Corporate History
We were incorporated in the State of
Nevada
on February 21, 2006 as Georgia
Exploration, Inc., a Vancouver, Canada-based mineral resource exploration
company with interests in 14 non-oil and gas mineral claims in
British Columbia
. On January 3, 2007, we
consummated a reverse merger with Wharton Resources Corp. (“Wharton” or “Wharton
Corp.”). The merger resulted in a change in control of us with
Wharton’s former stockholders holding approximately 71.4% of the then issued and
outstanding shares of our common stock. On March 8, 2007, we
changed our name to Gulf Western Petroleum Corporation.
General
Overview
We are engaged in the acquisition,
exploration and development of oil and natural gas reserves in the
United States
. Upon completion of our
reverse merger, Wharton’s oil and gas interests and reserves became our primary
assets and our core business became the exploration and development of domestic
oil and natural gas reserves in the
United States
.
We currently hold oil and gas lease
interests in
Texas
,
Kansas
and
Kentucky
. We are actively engaged in
the drilling of Frio formation wells in
Dewitt
County
and
Lavaca County
,
Texas
. We also hold proved
undeveloped reserves in
Wharton County
,
Texas
, and we are engaged in a natural gas
supply and gas gathering system development project in
Southeast Kansas
. We hold oil and gas lease
interests in
Kentucky
that are exploratory in nature.
We hope to establish commercial levels of production from our Texas Shamrock and
Brushy Creek
Project
wells
in Dewitt and
Lavaca Counties
,
Texas
during 2008. We are actively
pursuing financing options to initiate the drilling of our proved undeveloped
natural gas and oil reserves in our Oakcrest Prospect located in
Wharton County
,
Texas
.
Principal
Properties
Oakcrest Prospect (Wilcox Formation),
Wharton County,
Texas
Our Oakcrest Prospect is located in
south central
Texas
, approximately 75 miles southwest of
Houston
,
Texas
. We hold oil and gas
lease interests in approximately 866 acres with a working interest of 95.75% and
we serve as operator. The main target of hydrocarbon production is
the Wilcox formation, with secondary targets for the Oakcrest Prospect being the
Frio
and Yegua formations that will be
traversed while in route to the Wilcox formation during drilling. The lease
acreage is adjacent to and lies immediately to the north-east of the existing
Southwest Bonus Field. The prospect is located in the central Gulf
Coast Plain on the east side of the San Marcos Arch in
Wharton County
,
Texas
. All Wilcox fields in
the Gulf Coast Plain are fault-bounded and produce from simple, normal
fault-bounded anticlines. The Wilcox formation is Eocene-age and is
found at a depth of approximately 11,000 to 12,500 feet. A
combination of aeromagnetic surveys and well control had originally defined the
structure of the Oakcrest Prospect. Through 2-D seismic data
reprocessing and reinterpretation, two large normal faults that were previously
identified were confirmed together with two smaller possible
faults.
Initial production in the Southwest Bonus Field commenced in
August 1998 with the Obenhaus Gas Unit which to date has yielded total
production of approximately 4,206 MMcf. We do not hold interests in
the Southwest Bonus Field. However in connection with the reserve
evaluation of the Oakcrest Prospect, we acquired data for sixty one (61) Wilcox
formation producing wells, located in the Southwest Bonus Field, that we
evaluated to ascertain their estimated ultimate
recoveries. Production data through June 2007 was obtained and
evaluated to develop decline curve analysis for each well in order to forecast
remaining and ultimate reserves for wells that are currently
producing. For wells that were no longer producing, the cumulative
natural gas and oil production were used to develop ultimate
recoveries. Median recovery from the Southwest Bonus Field
offset producing wells is approximately 2,436 MMcf and 73,100 barrels of oil per
well.
There are two productive wells in the Southwest Bonus Field
within 1100 feet of the two locations where we have has ascribed proved
undeveloped reserves. The Krueger No. 9 has ultimate reserve
recoveries of 3.5 Bcf and 73.8 million barrels oil (“MBO”), while the Anderson
No. 6 has ultimate reserve recoveries of 2.6 Bcf and 80.0
MBO. Additionally, there are five producing wells within 2000 feet of
the two locations identified by the Company with average reserve recoveries of
2.5 Bcf and 68.7 MBO. On an 8/8ths gross basis, we assigned
proved undeveloped reserves to two locations of 2,436 MMcf and 53,348 barrels of
condensate each.
Production forecasts for the Oakcrest Prospect locations were
derived based on the historical behavior of the Wilcox formation offset wells in
the Southwest Bonus Field. Based on the production behavior of the
offset wells, the initial gas production rate for the Oakcrest wells was plotted
to be 15,000 Mcf per day with an initial decline rate of 90% per year, and a
hyperbolic exponent of 0.8.
We engaged MHA Petroleum Consultants, Inc. (“MHA”) to make a
technical evaluation our Oakcrest Prospect natural gas and oil reserves, and to
formulate estimates of the proved reserves and income attributable to our
interests in the prospect. In MHA’s evaluation of the Oakcrest
Prospect, 17 potential well locations were identified. Two well
locations contain reserves categorized as proved reserves. A summary
of the results of MHA’s technical evaluation of oil and natural gas reserves
categorized as proved as of August 31, 2007, together with the net undiscounted
cash flows, discounted future cash flows at a 10.0% discount rate (“PV10”) on a
before and after tax basis are as follows:
Summary
of Oil and Natural Gas Reserves
(Prepared
as of the Company’s Fiscal Year-End of August 31, 2007)
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
(MBBL)
|
|
|
(MBBL)
|
|
|
(MMCF)
|
|
|
(MMCF)
|
|
Total
Proved Reserves
|
|
|
146.2
|
|
|
|
106.7
|
|
|
|
4,872
|
|
|
|
3,308
|
|
Cash Flows and PV 10 Proved
Reserves
Before
(“BFIT”) and After (“AFIT”) Income Taxes
(Discounted at 10%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future net
revenue
|
|
$
|
28,610
|
|
|
$
|
28,610
|
|
Future operating
costs
|
|
|
3,256
|
|
|
|
3,256
|
|
Future income
taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,604
|
|
Operating cash
flow
|
|
$
|
25,354
|
|
|
$
|
22,750
|
|
Capital
investment
|
|
|
8,693
|
|
|
|
8,693
|
|
Undiscounted future net cash
flow
|
|
$
|
16,661
|
|
|
$
|
14,057
|
|
Discounted PV10 cash
flow
|
|
$
|
13,066
|
|
|
$
|
11,168
|
|
The economics and cash flows presented in the above table are
based on our 95.75% working interest and 73.0% net revenue interest in the
Oakcrest Prospect. In the absence of existing production
from our Oakcrest Prospect, we were required to estimate the prevailing market
price that we would have realized from the sale of August 2007 condensate and
natural gas production based on similarly situated production and pricing in the
proximity to the Oakcrest Prospect. Tennessee Gas, an interstate
natural gas pipeline, crosses our lease acreage and provides us access to the
interstate natural gas market. The sales rate for gas
deliveries into the Tennessee Gas pipeline system can be fixed to the Henry Hub,
Louisiana NYMEX contract price with an established physical location basis to
Henry Hub, Sproule Associates, a highly regarded reservoir engineering
firm, prepares monthly constant price and forecasted price for commodities and
its constant price forecast for the month of August 2007 at the Henry Hub,
Lousiana was $7.00 per MMbtu. We estimated that, in relationship to
the Henry Hub, we would realize a minimum of at least $7.00 per Mcf for our
production, less 5% for gathering and compression charges, and less a historical
location basis between Tennesee Gas Texas leg and the Henry Hub of $0.20 per
Mcf (i.e., $7.00 Mcf X 95% - $0.20 / mcf) or a wellhead netback
realization of $6.45 per Mcf for August 2007 sales. Condensate
sales were prepared based on a West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) of $73.19 per
barrel less $5.00 location basis (with a wellhead netback of $68.19 to us).
Estimated capital expenditures to drill
and complete a well is approximately $4.4 million based on current rig rates,
casing prices, sub-surface and surface equipment, and other ancillary services
and materials required to drill and complete a Wilcox
formation
well.
Our current plan of operations is to secure financing to fund
the drilling of a minimum of two wells. The location for the first
well to be drilled has been identified, surveyed and staked, and a preliminary
drilling permit has been secured. Under the terms of our oil and gas
lease, we have an obligation to spud an initial well before September 1,
2008. A second well also targeting reserves identified as proved
undeveloped is scheduled to spud immediately following the completion of the
initial well. Upon the drilling of the first and second Wilcox wells,
we will make further technical evaluations to ascertain whether reserves
originally categorized as probable have shifted to proved reserves with further
data assembled through the drilling of these Wilcox wells. If
successful, we plan to drill a third Wilcox formation well during 2008
leveraging off the information acquired from the first two wells.
Texas
Shamrock and Brushy Creek Projects
(Frio Formation), Dewitt and
Lavaca Counties
,
Texas
Our Texas Frio formation wells that
comprise our Shamrock and Brushy Creek
Projects
are our first wells to commence
commercial production with the first well, the Pope No. 1 (Brushy Creek V),
going on line in November 2007. In our Frio initiative,
we are participating in the drilling of a minimum of twelve Frio-age natural gas
wells located in Dewitt and
Lavaca Counties
,
Texas
. All twelve wells
have been identified through newly acquired 3-D seismic
data. Frio-age sediments lie below the Anahuac Shale, a detachment
zone within the Post Isabel Fold Belt. The Shamrock Project in
Dewitt
County
consists of five Frio wells
drilled in 2007, and our participation in the Brushy Creek Project consists of
non-operated interests in seven Frio wells located in
Lavaca County
,
Texas
. Our Texas Frio formation
projects are operated by third parties. The Shamrock Project is
operated by Caskids Operating Company, and the Brushy Creek Project is operated
by Suncoast Technical Services, Inc.
Shamrock
Project
The Shamrock Project is a five well
drilling program located in Dewitt County, Texas that is targeting Frio-age
natural gas reserves that have been identified through 3-D seismic. Frio-age
wells have proven to be prolific natural gas producers throughout the
Texas
Gulf
Coast
region. The target
formation is the Jameson Sand at total well depth at approximately 3200
feet. The five wells drilled and completed in the Shamrock
Project are the Polinard-Lee No. 1, the Miller-Thomas No. 1, the Bushmill No. 1,
the Red Breast No. 1 and the Michael Collins No. 1. All five
wells had flow rates during test of 310 – 325 Mcf per day. We
hold an average 65.0% working interest and 45.5% net revenue interest in the
wells.
Our plan of operation for the Shamrock
Project is to finish the interconnection of the wells and to effect commercial
production creating operating cash flows to us.
Brushy Creek
Project
The Brushy Creek Project is a 3-D
seismic controlled project situated in the prolific Oligocene Frio oil and
natural gas trend located in the lower
Texas
Gulf
Coast
. The Brushy Creek Project
was initiated in 2005, and to date has been successful in ten out of ten
wells. The first ten wells resulted in six
Frio
discoveries, three Miocenen discoveries
and one Yegua completion. These ten new wells entail drilling that
targets several high quality amplitude anomalies similar to those that have
proven to be productive in the previous drilling. We currently
hold interests in seven Brushy Creek Project wells, and are evaluating the
participation in three additional
Frio
wells scheduled for
drilling. Our average working and net revenue interests in the
existing seven drilled wells is 34.4% and 24.9%,
respectively.
The seven wells drilled and completed
during 2007 that we hold interests in are the Goodrich-Toyah No. 1, Nichol’s No.
1, Pope No. 1, Goodrich-Deleplain No. 1, Goodrich-Poindexter No. 1, O’Neal Smith
No. 1 and the Williams No. 6. These wells are in various stages
of testing and interconnection.
Our plan of operation is to complete
testing and interconnection of the seven existing Brushy Creek Frio wells, and
to evaluate our further participation in the Brushy Creek
Project.
Mound Branch Reserve and Infrastructure
Development Project,
Elk
County
,
Kansas
On
January 30, 2007 we purchased Orbit Energy, LLC’s (“Orbit”) working and net
revenue interests in approximately 8,800 gross acres located in Elk County,
Kansas together with its interests in certain drilled wells and associated
equipment (the “Mound Branch Project”). Orbit is owned by CodeAmerica
Investments, LLC for which Wm. Milton Cox, our Chairman and CEO, is the Managing
Member, and Paragon Capital, LLC for which Bassam Nastat, our President and a
Director, serves as Manager.
The purchase price totaled $6.8 million,
and consideration paid to Orbit was comprised of: a) $760,947 of funds that we
advanced to Orbit for testing and evaluation of the existing well bores,
reservoir formations and associated lease acreage; b) a thirty-six month $2.0
million 10% convertible note with principal due at maturity; and c) 4,039,053
shares of our common stock with a fair value of $1.00 per common share at the
time of issuance, subject to a true up upon receipt of an independent report
assessing the fair value of the assets acquired at no less than the purchase
price of $6.8 million. Should the valuation be less than the $6.8
million purchase price then the number of shares released to Orbit on January
30, 2008, the one-year anniversary of the purchase from Orbit, will be ratably
reduced for the lower valuation and shares will be returned to
treasury.
The Mound Branch Project is a natural
gas reserve and gathering system development project of existing and after
acquired oil and gas lease acreage, and existing wellbores previously drilled by
Orbit and its working interest partners. The Mound Branch Project
consists of a three year drilling program to drill fifty wells per year and for
the construction of a 15-mile low pressure gathering system. The
required gathering system would have design capacity of 8,000 Mcf per day, and
is necessary for the delivery of existing and expected prospective well head
production into the interstate natural gas pipeline grid in
Kansas
. Orbit serves as the
operator of the Mound Branch Project.
The Mound Branch natural gas reserves
cover Cherokee Group clastic rocks over Mississippian limestones. Depth to the
Mississippian basement in the Cherokee Group ranges from 0 feet at outcrops in
the extreme southeastern corner of
Kansas
to more than 2,500 feet (762 m)
in Elk and
Chautauqua
Counties
as the Mississippian and Cherokee
Group rocks gradually dip to the west and southwest. The majority of
wells are expected to produce from the Mulky and
Summit
coals at approximately 1,600 feet
depth, with additional potential in the Mississippi
Limestone.
Recent testing of the Mound Branch
Project MT19-1 well, the first Mississippi Limestone well showed absolute open
flow (i.e., the maximum flow rate that a well could theoretically deliver with
zero pressure at the face of the reservoir) at 1,400
Mcf per day
. The 72 Hour
Flow Test performed over three days on the MT19-1 well established initital
production rates of approximately 350 to 400 MCF per day. The
flow rates in the 72 Hour Test were established by flowing the well through a
two phase separator and measuring volumes thru a 2-inch orfice tester vented to
the atmosphere. Well pressures and volumes were recorded hourly, and
choke setting were varied to establish production rates. Well
pressure was 610 lbs. at the commencement of the testing, and 590 lbs. at the
end of the test.
Test results for the coal wells tested indicate that the wells,
completed in the Cherokee coal group, will be initially produced at a rate of
approximately 38-40 Mcf per day. There are eight existing wells
drilled that are expected to achieve commercial levels of production if a
gathering system can be constructed. Six of the eight of the Cherokee
coal group wells had 72 Hour Flow Tests performed on them, and the range of test
results were as follows:
Well Name
|
Plate Size
(Inch)
|
Test Result Range
(Mcf/d)
|
|
|
|
DB 19-3
|
0.375
|
32.1 - 43.7
|
DB 16-3
|
0.350
|
31.8 - 48.4
|
DD 16-2
|
0.375
|
25.6 - 48.6
|
MT 29-1
|
0.400
|
39.2 - 61.2
|
MT 29-1
|
0.375
|
37.5 - 47.2
|
MT29-2
|
0.375
|
31.1 - 47.6
|
DD 16-8
|
0.350
|
32.7 - 47.4
|
DD 16-8
|
0.350
|
36.7 - 55.5
|
Since our acquisition of Orbit’s
interests in the
Mound
Branch
Project we have been
funding 100% of the costs incurred by Orbit for the testing and evaluation of
the of the existing well bores, reservoir formations and associated lease
acreage, including amounts attributable to other working interest owners in the
existing wells. The amounts paid on the behalf of other working
interest owners
total
$198,106 through August 31, 2007, and
we expect that the amounts will be charged back to the other working interest
owners in the wells ratable to their working interests.
Orbit has advised
us
that the testing and evaluation
procedures for the Mound Branch Project were substantially completed during
October
2007. Orbit has
recently advised that they recommend
performing a test on one well to
further evaluate the Mulberry coal formation that has not been
previously
tested, but has been determined to be
productive for other producers in the area.
Our plan of operation for Mound Branch
is to complete the evaluation of the Mulberry coal formation, and to continue
progress
on the development
of
the natural gas supply
and gathering system project.
Other Prospects
Baxter
Bledsoe Prospect,
Clay
County
,
Kentucky
On February 1, 2006, we purchased the Baxter Bledsoe Prospect
oil and gas lease acreage from CodeAmerica for $330,000 cash. The prospect has
approximately 2,200 acres located in Clay County, Kentucky. The Baxter Bledsoe
Prospect is characterized as exploratory acreage, and our plan of operation
provides for the drilling of an initial exploratory well targeting the Black
River Group formation during 2008. We hold a 100% working
interest in the prospect and serve as operator.
Bell
Prospect,
Bell
County
,
Kentucky
On October 1, 2006, we acquired from
CodeAmerica oil and gas lease interests located in
Bell County
,
Kentucky
. We paid $314,475 to
CodeAmerica for the Bell Prospect which is comprised of approximately 3,400
acres that are categorized as exploratory. Our plan of operation for the Bell
Prospect
is to assemble
and evaluate data with respect to the prospect
once the initial exploratory well
on the Baxter Bledsoe prospect is completed and the data acquired during the
drilling process is assembled and evaluated
.
We hold a 100% working interest in the
prospect and serve as operator.
Market and
Competition
Our long-term success depends on our
ability to identify, acquire and develop oil and natural gas reserves in
quantities and at prices that are physically and commercially
competitive. The
U.S.
natural gas, oil and associated product
markets are highly competitive and experience extreme volatility in commodity
prices, much of which are driven by factors outside our control. Our
experience is that crude oil, condensate and associated product prices are
driven primarily by global geopolitics, while natural gas prices in the
U.S.
are primarily determined by the
interaction of consumer and industrial demand and available natural gas
supply
.
A large portion of the natural gas,
crude oil and associated products production in the
U.S.
has historically been in the states of
Texas
,
Louisiana
,
Oklahoma
, and in the offshore areas associated
with the
Gulf of
Mexico
. The
natural gas and crude oil production in these areas are interconnected to
consuming markets through a vast network of existing developed infrastructure to
move production through pipelines or via trucks to markets.
Notwithstanding increased drilling
activity in the
U.S.
, domestic natural gas and crude oil
production has not materially increased while consumer demand continues to
grow. The maturation of
U.S.
supply basins has resulted in declining
well recoveries and higher production decline rates. Although
generally more costly than conventional supply sources, supply from
non-conventional sources of natural gas, such as liquefied natural gas and
coalbed methane, is becoming more prevalent and is attracting significant
capital investment to explore and develop these potential non-conventional
supply opportunities. The development of non-conventional supply
sources will in many instances also require capital investment to develop the
infrastructure necessary to effect delivery of production into
markets.
We compete with independent oil and
natural gas companies for commercial prospect acquisitions/participation;
equipment, drilling rigs and labor required to evaluate and develop prospects;
capital resources to fund capital investments; and in the sale of production
into the oil and natural gas markets in the
U.S.
The volatile nature of the
U.S.
energy markets makes it difficult to
estimate future prices of oil and natural gas, and competition for drilling rigs
makes it very difficult to forecast the development costs of our prospects and
the timeframe under which they can be developed. Many of our
competitors have substantially greater financial resources than we have, which
may allow them to define, evaluate, acquire and develop a greater number of
prospects than we can.
Regulation
In the
United States
, domestic development, production and
sale of oil and natural gas are extensively regulated at both the federal and
state levels. These regulations include requiring permits for
drilling wells; maintaining prevention plans; submitting notification and
receiving permits in relation to the presence, use and release of certain
materials incidental to oil and natural gas operations; and regulating the
location of wells, the method of drilling and casing wells, the use,
transportation, storage and disposal of fluids and materials used in connection
with drilling and production activities, surface plugging and abandoning of
wells and the transporting of production. Legislation affecting the
oil and natural gas industry is under constant review for amendment or
expansion, frequently increasing the regulatory burden. Also,
numerous departments and agencies, both federal and state, have issued rules and
regulations binding on the oil and natural gas industry and its individual
members, compliance with which is often difficult and costly and some of which
carry substantial penalties for failure to comply. Inasmuch as new
legislation affecting the oil and natural gas industry is commonplace, and
existing laws and regulations are frequently amended or reinterpreted,
we
are unable to predict
the
future cost or impact
of complying with these laws and regulations.
State statutes and regulations require
permits for drilling operations, drilling bonds and reports concerning wells.
Texas
and other states in which we intend to
conduct operations also have statutes and regulations governing conservation
matters, including the unitization or pooling of oil and natural gas properties
and establishment of maximum rates of production from oil and natural gas
wells.
Our operations are also subject to
extensive and developing federal, state and local laws and regulations relating
to environmental, health and safety matters; petroleum; chemical products and
materials; and waste management. Permits, registrations or other
authorizations are required for the operation of certain of our facilities and
for our oil and natural gas exploration and future production activities. These
permits, registrations or authorizations are subject to revocation, modification
and renewal. Governmental authorities have the power to enforce
compliance with these regulatory requirements, the provisions of required
permits, registrations or other authorizations, and lease conditions, and
violators are subject to civil and criminal penalties, including fines,
injunctions or both. Failure to obtain or maintain a required permit
may also result in the imposition of civil and criminal penalties. Third parties
may have the right to sue to enforce compliance.
Our operations are also subject to
various conservation matters, including the number of wells which may be drilled
in a unit and the unitization or pooling of oil and natural gas properties. In
this regard, some states allow the forced pooling or integration of tracts to
facilitate exploration while other states rely on voluntary pooling of lands and
leases, which may make it more difficult to develop oil and natural gas
properties. In addition, state conservation laws establish maximum rates of
production oil and natural gas wells, generally limit the venting or flaring of
natural gas, and impose certain requirements regarding the ratable purchase of
production. The effect of these regulations is to limit the amounts of oil and
natural gas that we can produce from our wells and to limit the number of wells
or the locations at which we can drill.
Our operations, as is the case in the
petroleum industry generally, are significantly affected by federal tax laws.
Federal, as well as state, tax laws have many provisions applicable to
corporations which could affect our future tax liability.
Environmental
Matters
Our exploration, development, and future
production of oil and natural gas are subject to various federal, state and
local environmental laws and regulations discussed below. Such laws and
regulations can increase the costs of planning, designing, installing and
operating oil and natural gas wells. We consider the cost of
environmental protection a necessary and manageable part of our business. We
have been able to plan for and comply with new environmental initiatives without
materially altering our operating strategies.
Our activities are subject to a variety
of environmental laws and regulations, including but not limited to, the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA”), the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), the Clean Air Act, and the Safe Drinking
Water Act, as well as state regulations promulgated under comparable state
statutes. We are also subject to regulations governing the handling,
transportation, storage, and disposal of naturally occurring radioactive
materials that are found in our oil and natural gas operations. Civil and
criminal fines and penalties may be imposed for non-compliance with these
environmental laws and regulations. Additionally, these laws and regulations
require the acquisition of permits or other governmental authorizations before
undertaking certain activities, limit or prohibit other activities because of
protected areas or species, and impose substantial liabilities for cleanup of
pollution.
Under the OPA, a release of oil into
water or other areas designated by the statute could result in us being held
responsible for the costs of remediating such a release, certain OPA specified
damages, and natural resource damages. The extent of that liability could be
extensive, as set out in the statute, depending on the nature of the release. A
release of oil in harmful quantities or other materials into water or other
specified areas could also result in us being held responsible under the CWA for
the costs of remediation, and civil and criminal fines and
penalties.
CERCLA and comparable state statutes,
also known as “Superfund” laws, can impose joint and several and retroactive
liability, without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct, on
certain classes of persons for the release of a “hazardous substance” into the
environment. In practice, cleanup costs are usually allocated among various
responsible parties. Potentially liable parties include site owners or
operators, past owners or operators under certain conditions, and entities that
arrange for the disposal or treatment of, or transport hazardous substances
found at the site. Although CERCLA, as amended, currently exempts petroleum,
including but not limited to, crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids
from the definition of hazardous substance, our operations may involve the use
or handling of other materials that may be classified as hazardous substances
under CERCLA. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that the exemption will be
preserved in future amendments of the act, if any.
RCRA and comparable state and local
requirements impose standards for the management, including treatment, storage,
and disposal of both hazardous and non-hazardous solid wastes. We generate
hazardous and non-hazardous solid waste in connection with our routine
operations. From time to time, proposals have been made that would reclassify
certain oil and natural gas wastes, including wastes generated during drilling,
production and pipeline operations, as “hazardous wastes” under RCRA which would
make such solid wastes subject to much more stringent handling, transportation,
storage, disposal, and clean-up requirements. This development could have a
significant impact on our operating costs. While state laws vary on this issue,
state initiatives to further regulate oil and natural gas wastes could have a
similar impact.
Research and
Development
Our business plan is focused on the
exploration and development of our oil and natural gas interests. We do not
anticipate that we will expend any significant funds on research and development
over the twelve months ending August 31, 2008.
Purchase of Significant
Equipment
We do not intend to purchase any significant equipment over the
next twelve months, other than in the ordinary course of business.
Employees
We currently have five full-time and
part-time employees. We generally utilize short term contractors, consultants
and professional service providers, as necessary. Our directors and officers
provide services on a month to month basis pursuant to oral arrangements, but
have not signed employment or consulting agreements with us. We do not expect
any material changes in the number of employees over the next twelve month
period. We may enter formal written service agreements with our directors and
officers in the future. We expect to utilize contractors and consultants as
needed to meet our staffing needs, and will continue to periodically evaluate
costs and benefits of staffing our resource requirements externally or
internally. We expect that the level of success of our exploration and
development initiatives will drive the timing and level of employees that we may
retain in the future.
Going Concern
Our financial statements have been
prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern. We are in our development
stage and, accordingly, have several capital initiatives but no revenues. We
have raised limited financing and have incurred operating losses since our
inception. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue
as a going concern, and our ability to achieve and maintain profitability and
positive cash flows are dependent on our ability to secure sufficient financing
to fund the acquisition, drilling and development of profitable oil and natural
gas properties. We are actively pursuing financing options which we believe
would allow us to establish and sustain commercial production. There are no
assurances that we will be able to obtain additional financing from investors or
private lenders and, if available, such financing may not be on commercial terms
acceptable to us or our stockholders. The financial statements do not include
any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. We
intend to raise financing sufficient to fund our capital expenditure and working
capital requirements for the next twelve months principally through private
placements and possibly public offerings.
Risks
Factors
Risks
Related to our Business
Without additional financing, there
is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern
.
Our
audited consolidated financial statements as of August 31, 2007 and 2006 and for
each of the two years ended August 31, 2007 and 2006, and from inception
(January 20, 2005) to August 31, 2007 were prepared assuming that we will
continue as a going concern. We are in our development stage and have
had limited operations and no revenues from our inception through August 31,
2007. Our independent accountants in their audit report have
expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern. Our continued operations are dependent on our ability to
achieve profitability and to generate and maintain positive operating cash
flows. This is driven by our ability to complete equity and debt
financings sufficient to fund the acquisition, drilling and development of
profitable oil and gas properties. Such financings may not be
available to us or may not be on reasonable terms. Our financial
statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of
this uncertainty.
We have a very
limited history of operations in oil and natural gas exploration and production
and accordingly may not be successful in carrying out our business
objectives
.
We were
incorporated in the State of Nevada on February 21, 2006 as Georgia Exploration,
Inc., a Vancouver based mineral resource exploration company with interests in
14 non-oil and gas mineral claims in British Columbia. On January 3,
2007, we consummated a merger with Wharton Resources Corp. Upon
completion of the merger, our core business and strategic focus became the
exploration and development of oil and natural gas reserves in the United
States.
We have raised limited financing and have incurred operating
losses since our inception, with total losses of approximately $3,817,250
through August 31, 2007. We have no track record of successful oil
and gas exploration and development activities that would allow an investor to
assess the likelihood of us, or guarantee that we will be successful, as an oil
and natural gas exploration and production company. We may fail to
achieve or maintain successful operations, even in favorable market
conditions. There is a substantial risk that we will not be
successful in our exploration activities, or if initially successful, in
thereafter generating any operating revenues or otherwise achieving sustained
and recurring operating cash flows.
We may require additional funding,
and our failure to raise additional capital necessary to support and expand our
operations could reduce our ability to compete and could harm our
business
.
Over the next twelve months, we plan to spend approximately
$12.8 million for oil and natural gas exploration, drilling and development
expenditures, and approximately $1.6 million for general and administrative,
operating and public company expenses, and working capital
requirements. See “Plan of Operations” for more
information. Based on our plan of operation, our current available
cash and projected operating cash flows are not sufficient to fund our capital
and operating requirements over the next twelve month period. In
particular, our current and projected operating cash flows from our Frio
formation oil and gas production in Dewitt and Lavaca Counties, Texas are not
sufficient to repay the total $3.7 million principal balance due on September
10, 2008 under the notes issued to certain of our investors. The first six
months of interest on these notes totaling $266,500 is due on March 10,
2008. We are dependent on external financing sources to raise funds
sufficient to repay the principal balance due on these notes at maturity.
To
execute our plans, we will require substantial financing and are actively
working on options to raise equity and/or debt financing through private
placements and public offerings. However, in the event that we are unable to
raise the financing to meet our needs, or
if we are able to obtain sufficient
financing from investors or private lenders but it is on commercial terms
unacceptable to us or our stockholders
, we will be required to scale back
or slow our capital investment program. Should we raise funds through equity and
debt placements, existing equity and ownership in us could be negatively
affected due to the dilution of existing equity ownership of our
shares.
The notes issued
to certain of our investors mature in twelve months and are secured by
substantially all of our assets, so the failure to repay the notes could cause
us to cease operations
.
As noted
above, the notes issued to certain of our investors in connection with the
financing that we completed in September 2007, are due on September 10, 2008 and
are secured by a lien on substantially all of our assets, including our oil and
gas lease interests and our equity interests in our subsidiaries. We
are dependent on external financing sources to raise funds sufficient to repay
the principal due under these notes at maturity. Alternate external financing
may be comprised of equity and debt, which may or may not be available to us on
reasonable terms. If we are not successful in or unable to repay the
$3.7 million principal balance on the maturity of the notes, since substantially
all our assets are pledged as security to the lenders,
we may be
unable to continue our business and as a result may be required to scale back or
cease operations for our business, the result of which would be that our
stockholders would lose some or all of their investment.
Our related party
transactions may cause conflicts of interests that may adversely affect our
ability to operate our business
.
We have
entered into and may, in the future, enter into various transactions and
agreements with entities wholly or partially owned by our officer and directors,
including Orbit Energy, LLC, which is
owned
by CodeAmerica Investments,
LLC, for which Wm. Milton Cox, our Chairman and CEO, is the Managing Member, and
Paragon Capital, LLC for which Bassam Nastat, our President and a Director,
serves as Manager. We believe that the transactions and agreements
that we have entered into with related parties are on terms that are at least as
favorable to us as could reasonably have been obtained at such time from third
parties. However, these relationships could create, or appear to
create, potential conflicts of interest when members of our senior management
are faced with decisions that could have different implications for us and those
entities or their affiliates.
Potential conflicts of interest can exist if a related party
director or officer has to make a decision that has different implications for
us and the related party. We cannot be certain as to how potentially
conflicted board members or officers will evaluate their fiduciary duties or how
such individuals will act under such circumstances. Furthermore, the appearance
of conflicts, even if such conflicts do not materialize, might adversely affect
the public's perception of us, as well as our relationship with other companies
and our ability to enter into new relationships in the future, which could have
a material adverse effect on our ability to do business.
Our exploration and development
operations are subject to many risks which may affect our ability to profitably
extract oil and natural gas reserves or achieve targeted returns. In
addition, continued growth requires that we acquire and successfully develop
additional oil and natural gas reserves.
Oil and natural gas exploration may involve unprofitable
efforts, not only from dry wells, but from wells that are productive but do not
produce sufficient net revenues to return a profit after drilling, operating and
other costs. Completion of a well does not assure a profit on the investment or
recovery of drilling, completion and operating costs. In addition, drilling
hazards or environmental damage could greatly increase the cost of operations,
and various field operating conditions may adversely affect the production from
successful wells. These conditions include delays in obtaining governmental
approvals or consents, shut-ins of connected wells resulting from extreme
weather conditions, insufficient storage or transportation capacity or other
geological and mechanical conditions. Production delays and declines from normal
field operating conditions cannot be eliminated and can be expected to adversely
affect revenue and cash flow levels to varying degrees.
Our commercial success depends on our ability to find, acquire,
develop and commercially produce oil and natural gas reserves. Without the
continual addition of new reserves, any existing reserves and the production
therefrom will decline over time as such existing reserves are depleted. A
future increase in our reserves will depend not only on our ability to explore
and develop any properties we may have from time to time, but also on our
ability to select and acquire suitable producing properties or prospects.
We may not be able to continue to locate satisfactory properties for
acquisition or participation. Moreover, if such acquisitions or
participations are identified, we may determine that current markets, terms of
acquisition and participation or pricing conditions make such acquisitions or
participations economically disadvantageous. We also may be unable to
discover or acquire commercial quantities of oil and natural gas at all.
Our oil and natural gas operations are
subject to operating hazards that may increase our operating costs to prevent
such hazards, or may materially affect our operating results if any of such
hazards were to occur.
Oil and natural gas exploration,
development and production operations are subject to all the risks and hazards
typically associated with such operations, including hazards such as fire,
explosion, blowouts, cratering, sour gas releases and spills, each of which
could result in substantial damage to oil and natural gas wells, production
facilities, other property and the environment or in personal injury. Oil and
natural gas production operations are also subject to all the risks typically
associated with such operations, including encountering unexpected formations or
pressures, premature decline of reservoirs and the invasion of water into
producing formations. Losses resulting from the occurrence of any of these risks
could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity and
financial condition.
To date, we have not generated revenues from production of our
oil and natural gas lease interests. Our oil and natural gas
exploration and development activities will be focused on the exploration and
development of our oil and natural gas rights which are high-risk ventures with
uncertain prospects for success. In addition, we will not have
earnings to support our activities should the wells drilled or properties
acquired prove not to be commercially viable. We may be unable to
successfully produce commercial quantities of oil and natural gas as a result of
our exploration and development efforts or to generate sufficient revenues from
production of our reserves.
Our exploration and development activities will depend in part
on the evaluation of data obtained through geophysical testing and geological
analysis, as well as test drilling activity. The results of such studies
and tests are subjective, and our exploration and development activities based
on positive analysis may not produce oil or natural gas in commercial
quantities. As developmental and exploratory activities are performed,
further data required for evaluation of our oil and natural gas interests may
become available. The exploration and development activities that will be
undertaken by us are subject to greater risks than those associated with the
acquisition and ownership of producing properties. The drilling of
development wells may result in dry holes or a failure to produce oil and
natural gas in commercial quantities. Moreover, any drilling of
exploratory wells is subject to significant risk of dry holes.
Sales of any production of oil or
natural gas from our present or future reserves are subject to numerous factors
beyond our control which could make it difficult to market and sell any oil and
natural gas at price and cost levels that are acceptable or profitable to
us.
The marketability of any oil or natural gas that may be
discovered by us will be affected by numerous factors beyond our control,
including market fluctuations, the supply and demand for natural gas, the
proximity and capacity of natural gas pipelines, oil transportation, and
processing equipment, as well as by government regulations, including
regulations relating to the prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, allowable
production, the import and export of natural gas and environmental protection.
These factors cannot be predicted. We are in the initial stage of
negotiating contracts for the delivery and sale of oil or natural gas production
from our properties. There is no guarantee that any such contracts will be
obtained or, if obtained, will be on terms which are economically viable to us.
If we are unable to successfully compete
with the large number of oil and natural gas producers in our industry, we may
not be able to achieve profitable operations.
Oil and natural gas exploration is intensely competitive in all
its phases and involves a high degree of risk. We compete with
numerous other participants in the search for and the acquisition of oil and
natural gas properties and in the marketing of oil and natural gas. Our
competitors include oil and natural gas companies that have substantially
greater financial resources, staff and facilities than us. Our ability to
increase reserves in the future will depend not only on our ability to explore
and develop our existing properties, but also on our ability to select and
acquire suitable producing properties or prospects for exploratory drilling.
The activities of our competitors in the marketplace may negatively impact
our operations and our ability to attract quality projects. In
addition, new competitors, some of whom may have extensive experience in related
fields or greater financial resources, may enter the
market. Increased competition could result in a loss of projects and
market share. Either of these results could seriously harm our
business and operating results.
We are subject to various regulatory
requirements, including environmental regulations, and may incur substantial
costs to comply and remain in compliance with those requirements.
Our operations in the United States are
subject to regulation at the federal, state and local levels, including
regulation relating to matters such as the exploration for and the development,
production, marketing, pricing, transmission and storage of oil and natural gas,
as well as environmental and safety matters. Failure to comply with
applicable regulations could result in fines or penalties being owed to third
parties or governmental entities, the payment of which could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. Our
operations are subject to significant laws and regulations, which may adversely
affect our ability to conduct business or increase our costs. Extensive
federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to health and
environmental quality in the
United States
affect nearly all of our operations.
These laws and regulations set various standards regulating various
aspects of health and environmental quality, provide for penalties and other
liabilities for the violation of these standards, and in some circumstances,
establish obligations to remediate current and former facilities and off-site
locations.
Environmental legislation provides for, among other things,
restrictions and prohibitions on spills, releases or emissions of various
substances produced in association with oil and natural gas operations. The
legislation also requires that wells and facility sites be operated, maintained,
abandoned and reclaimed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory
authorities. Compliance with such legislation can require significant
expenditures and a breach may result in the imposition of fines and penalties,
some of which may be material. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner
expected to result in stricter standards and enforcement, larger fines and
liability and potentially increased capital expenditures and operating costs.
The discharge of oil, natural gas or other pollutants into the air, soil or
water may give rise to liabilities to governments and third parties and may
require us to incur costs to remedy such discharge. Environmental laws may
result in a curtailment of production or a material increase in the costs of
production, development or exploration activities or otherwise adversely affect
our financial condition, results of operations or prospects. We could
incur significant liability for damages, clean-up costs and/or penalties in the
event of discharges into the environment, environmental damage caused by us or
previous owners of our property or non-compliance with environmental laws or
regulations. In addition to actions brought by governmental agencies, we could
face actions brought by private parties or citizens groups. Any of
the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
Moreover, we cannot predict what
legislation or regulations will be enacted in the future or how existing or
future laws or regulations will be administered, enforced or made more
stringent. Compliance with more stringent laws or regulations, or more vigorous
enforcement policies of the regulatory agencies, could require us to make
material expenditures for the installation and operation of systems and
equipment for remedial measures, all of which could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Our ability to successfully market and
sell oil and natural gas is subject to a number of factors that are beyond our
control, and that may adversely impact our ability to produce and sell oil and
natural gas, or to achieve profitability.
The marketability and price of oil and
natural gas that may be acquired or discovered by us will be affected by
numerous factors beyond our control. Our ability to market our natural gas
may depend upon our ability to acquire space on pipelines that deliver natural
gas to commercial markets. We may also be affected by deliverability
uncertainties related to the proximity of our reserves to pipelines and
processing facilities, by operational problems with such pipelines and
facilities, and by government regulation relating to price, taxes, royalties,
land tenure, allowable production, the export of oil and natural gas and by many
other aspects of the oil and natural gas business.
Our revenues, profitability and future
growth and the carrying value of our oil and natural gas properties are
substantially dependent on prevailing prices of oil and natural gas. Our ability
to borrow and to obtain additional capital on attractive terms is also
substantially dependent upon oil and natural gas prices. Prices for oil and
natural gas are subject to large fluctuations in response to relatively minor
changes in the supply of and demand for oil and natural gas, market uncertainty
and a variety of additional factors beyond our control. These factors include
economic conditions, in the
United States
and
Canada
, the actions of the Organization of
Petroleum Exporting Countries, governmental regulation, political stability in
the
Middle East
and elsewhere, the foreign supply of
oil and natural gas, the price of foreign imports and the availability of
alternative fuel sources. Any substantial and extended decline in the price of
oil and natural gas would have an adverse effect on the carrying value of our
proved reserves, borrowing capacity, revenues, profitability and cash flows from
operations.
Volatile oil and natural gas prices make
it difficult to estimate the value of producing properties for acquisition and
often cause disruption in the market for oil and natural gas producing
properties, as buyers and sellers have difficulty agreeing on such value. Price
volatility also makes it difficult to budget for and project the return on
acquisitions and development and exploitation projects.
We cannot guarantee that title to our
properties does not contain a defect that may materially affect our interest in
those properties.
It is our practice in acquiring significant oil and natural gas
leases or interest in oil and natural gas leases to retain lawyers to fully
examine the title to the interest under the lease. In the case of minor
acquisitions, we rely upon the judgment of oil and natural gas lease brokers or
landmen who do the field work in examining records in the appropriate
governmental office before attempting to place under lease a specific
interest. As such, there may be title defects which affect lands
comprising a portion of our properties which may adversely affect us.
Our
business may be harmed if we are unable to retain our interests in
leases
.
All of our properties are held under interests in oil and gas
mineral leases, some of which expire within the next twelve months. If we fail
to meet the specific requirements of each lease, especially future drilling and
production requirements, the lease may be terminated or otherwise expire. We may
be unable to meet our obligations under each lease. The termination or
expiration of our working interest relating to any lease would harm our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our reserve estimates are subject to
numerous uncertainties and may be inaccurate.
There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating
quantities of oil or natural gas reserves and cash flows to be derived
therefrom, including many factors beyond our control. The reserve and associated
cash flow information set forth herein represent estimates only. In general,
estimates of economically recoverable oil and natural gas reserves and the
future net cash flows therefrom are based upon a number of variable factors and
assumptions, such as historical production from the properties, production
rates, ultimate reserve recovery, timing and amount of capital expenditures,
marketability of oil and natural gas, royalty rates, the assumed effects of
regulation by governmental agencies and future operating costs, all of which may
vary from actual results. All such estimates are to some degree speculative, and
classifications of reserves are only attempts to define the degree of
speculation involved. For those reasons, estimates of the economically
recoverable oil and natural gas reserves attributable to any particular group of
properties, classification of such reserves based on risk of recovery and
estimates of future net revenues expected therefrom prepared by different
engineers, or by the same engineers at different times, may vary. Our actual
production, revenues, taxes and development and operating expenditures with
respect to our reserves will vary from estimates thereof and such variations
could be material.
Estimates of proved reserves that may be
developed and produced in the future are often based upon volumetric
calculations and upon analogy to similar types of reserves rather than actual
production history. Estimates based on these methods are generally less reliable
than those based on actual production history. Subsequent evaluation of the same
reserves based upon production history and production practices will result in
variations in the estimated reserves and such variations could be
material.
The reserve quantities included herein
were prepared by an independent reserve engineer, MHA Petroleum Consultants,
Inc. (“MHA”), and were prepared based on fiscal year-end prices and cost
estimates assuming continuation of existing economic conditions as of August 31,
2007.
Actual
future net revenue will be affected by other factors such as actual production
levels, supply and demand for oil and natural gas, curtailments or increases in
consumption by oil and natural gas purchasers, changes in governmental
regulation or taxation and the impact of inflation on costs. The MHA
reserve quantities and other calculations are based in part on the assumed
success of activities we intend to undertake in future periods, including
obtaining the financing required to fund the capital expenditures necessary to
effect the drilling and completion of the reserves identified in the MHA reserve
evaluation. The reserves and estimated cash flows to be derived from
the production of the reserves will be reduced if we are not successful in
undertaking the activities required in future periods.
We presently do not carry our own insurance and may be exposed
to significant liability should any claims arise for which we are not
insured.
Our involvement in the exploration for and development of oil
and natural gas properties may result in our becoming subject to liability for
pollution, blowouts, property damage, personal injury or other hazards. We do
not presently maintain our own insurance covering liabilities arising from our
operations. Even if we obtain insurance prior to drilling, such
insurance has limitations on liability that may not be sufficient to cover the
full extent of such liabilities. In addition, such risks may not in all
circumstances be insurable or, in certain circumstances, we may elect not to
obtain insurance to deal with specific risks due to the high premiums associated
with such insurance or other reasons. The payment of such uninsured liabilities
would reduce the funds available to us. The occurrence of a significant event
that we are not fully insured against, or the insolvency of the insurer of such
event, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results
of operations or prospects.
Some of our oil and natural gas
properties are held in the form of licenses and leases. If we default on
those licenses or leases, we may lose our interest in those
properties.
Our properties are held in the form of licenses and leases and
working interests in licenses and leases. If we or the holder of the license or
lease fail to meet the specific requirement of a license or lease, the license
or lease may terminate or expire. We may not be able to maintain or otherwise
meet the obligations required of each license or lease. The termination or
expiration of our licenses or leases or the working interests relating to a
license or lease may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations
and business.
The loss or unavailability of our key
personnel for an extended period of time could adversely affect our business
operations and prospects.
Our success depends in large measure on certain key personnel,
including our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.
The loss of the services of such key personnel could have a material adverse
effect on us. We do not currently have such insurance in effect for these
key individuals. In addition, the competition for qualified personnel in the oil
and natural gas industry is intense and we may be unable to continue to attract
and retain all personnel necessary for the development and operation of our
business.
We depend on the services of third
parties for material aspects of our operations, including drilling operators,
and accordingly if we cannot obtain certain third party services, we may not be
able to operate.
We may rely on third parties to operate some of the assets in
which we possess an interest. Assuming the presence of commercial quantities of
oil and natural gas on our properties, the success of the oil and natural gas
operations, whether considered on the basis of drilling operations or production
operations, will depend largely on whether the operator of the property properly
fulfills our obligations. As a result, our ability to exercise
influence over the operation of these assets or their associated costs may be
limited, adversely affecting our financial performance. Our performance
will therefore depend upon a number of factors that may be outside of our full
control, including the timing and amount of capital expenditures, the operator’s
expertise and financial resources, the approval of other participants, the
selection of technology, and risk management practices. The failure of
third party operators and their contractors to perform their services in a
proper manner could adversely affect our operations.
We will be subject to the requirements
of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. If we are unable to timely
comply with Section 404 or if the costs related to compliance are significant,
our profitability, stock price and results of operations and financial condition
could be materially adversely affected.
Pursuant to Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, beginning with our annual report on Form 10-KSB for
the fiscal year ending August 31, 2008, we will be required to furnish a report
by management on our internal control over financial reporting. This
report will contain, among other matters, an assessment of the effectiveness of
our internal control over financial reporting, including a statement as to
whether or not our internal control over financial reporting is effective.
This assessment must include disclosure of any material weaknesses in our
internal control over financial reporting identified by our
management. Beginning for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2009,
this report must also contain a statement that our auditors have issued an
attestation report on management’s assessment of internal control.
We cannot be certain that we will be
able to complete our assessment, testing and any required remediation in a
timely fashion. These reporting and assessment obligations will place
significant demands on our management, administrative, operational, internal
audit and accounting resources. We anticipate that we will need to upgrade our
reporting systems and procedures, implement additional financial and management
controls, and hire additional accounting and finance staff. If we are unable to
accomplish these objectives in a timely and effective fashion, our ability to
comply with our financial reporting requirements and other rules that apply to
reporting companies could be impaired. In addition, during the evaluation
and testing process, if we identify one or more material weaknesses in our
internal control over financial reporting, we will be unable to assert that our
system of internal control is effective. If we are unable to assert that our
internal control over financial reporting is effective (or if our auditors are
unable to attest that management’s report is fairly stated or they are unable to
express an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal controls), we could lose
investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports,
which could have a material adverse effect on our stock
price.
Any
failure to maintain effective internal controls could have a material adverse
effect on our business, operating results and stock price. In addition, expenses
related to services rendered by our accountants, legal counsel and consultants
will increase in order to ensure compliance with these laws and regulations.
Failure to comply with Section 404 may make it more difficult for us to obtain
certain types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance.
We may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage and/or to
incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage.
The impact of these events could also make it more difficult for us to
attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, on
committees of our board of directors, or as executive officers.
Risks Related to our Common
Stock
Shares
of our common stock may continue to be subject to price volatility and
illiquidity because our shares may continue to be thinly traded and may never
become eligible for trading on a national securities exchange
.
The trading volume for our common stock has historically been
insignificant, and an active trading market for our common stock may never
develop. There currently is limited analyst coverage of our business. We do not
have very many shares of common stock outstanding and the amount of shares in
our public “float” will continue to be limited due to the fact that significant
portions of our outstanding shares are held by our officers and directors and
their affiliates. As a result of the thin trading market for our common stock,
and the lack of analyst coverage, the market price for our shares may continue
to fluctuate significantly, and will likely be more volatile than the stock
market as a whole. There may be a limited demand for shares of our common stock
due to the reluctance or inability of certain investors to buy stocks quoted for
trading on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”), limited analyst
coverage of our common stock, and a negative perception by investors of stocks
traded on the OTCBB. As a result, even if prices appear favorable,
there may not be sufficient demand in order to complete a shareholder’s sell
order. Without an active public trading market or broader public ownership,
shares of our common stock are likely to be less liquid than the stock of most
public companies, and any of our shareholders who attempt to sell their shares
in any significant volumes may not be able to do so at all, or without
depressing the publicly quoted bid prices for their shares.
In addition, we may never achieve a listing of our common stock
on a national securities exchange. Initial listing on a national securities
exchange is subject to a variety of requirements, including minimum trading
price and minimum public “float” requirements, and could also be affected by the
general skepticism of such markets concerning companies that are the result of
mergers with inactive publicly-held companies. There are also continuing
eligibility requirements for companies listed on public trading markets. If we
are unable to satisfy the initial or continuing eligibility requirements of any
such market, then our stock may not be listed or could be delisted. This could
result in a lower trading price for our common stock and may limit your ability
to sell your shares, any of which could result in you losing some or all of your
investments.
Our
common stock is subject to the “penny stock” rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the trading market in our securities is limited, which
makes transactions in our stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an
investment in our stock
.
The Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “SEC”) has adopted Rule 3a51-1 which establishes the definition of a “penny
stock,” for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that (i) has a
market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than
$5.00 per share, or (ii) is not registered on a national securities exchange or
listed on an automated quotation system sponsored by a national securities
exchange. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, Rule 15g-9
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
requires:
|
•
|
that a broker or dealer approve a
person’s account for transactions in penny stocks;
and
|
|
•
|
the broker or dealer receives from
the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the
identity and quantity of the penny stock to be
purchased.
|
In order to approve a person’s account
for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must:
|
•
|
obtain financial information and
investment experience objectives of the person;
and
|
|
•
|
make a reasonable determination
that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the
person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be
capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny
stocks.
|
The broker or dealer must also deliver,
prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by
the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight
form:
|
•
|
sets forth the basis on which the
broker or dealer made the suitability determination;
and
|
|
•
|
attests that the broker or dealer
received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the
transaction.
|
Disclosure also has to be made about the
risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary
trading, and about the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the
registered representative. Current quotations for the securities and
the rights and remedies and to be available to an investor in cases of fraud in
penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing
recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information
on the limited market in penny stocks. Generally, brokers may be less
willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock”
rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of
our common stock and cause a decline in the market value of our
stock.
The market valuation of our business may
fluctuate due to factors beyond our control and the value of your investment may
fluctuate correspondingly.
The market valuation of energy
companies, such as us, frequently fluctuate due to factors unrelated to the past
or present operating performance of such companies. Our market
valuation may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, many
of which are beyond our control, including:
|
•
|
changes in securities analysts’
estimates of our financial
performance;
|
|
•
|
fluctuations in stock market
prices and volumes, particularly among securities of energy
companies;
|
|
•
|
changes in market valuations of
similar companies;
|
|
•
|
announcements by us or our
competitors of significant contracts, new technologies, acquisitions,
commercial relationships, joint ventures or capital
commitments;
|
|
•
|
variations in our quarterly
operating results;
|
|
•
|
fluctuations in oil and natural
gas prices; and
|
|
•
|
additions or departures of key
personnel.
|
As a result, the value of your
investment in us may fluctuate.
Investors should not look to dividends
as a source of income
.
In the
interest of reinvesting initial profits back into our business, we do not intend
to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently, any
economic return will initially be derived, if at all, from appreciation in the
fair market value of our stock, and not as a result of dividend
payments.
Item
2.
|
Description of
Property
|
Reserves
Our proved natural gas and associated oil reserves have been
estimated as of August 31, 2007 and presented in following table. The
reserves presented in the table are based on reserve evaluations performed by
MHA Petroleum Consultants, Inc., an independent reserve engineer, and reported
in their report entitled “Securities and Exchange Commission Evaluation, Oil
& Natural Gas Reserves, Oakcrest Prospect, Wharton County,
Texas.”
The reserve quantities
were prepared based on
fiscal year-end prices and cost estimates
assuming continuation of existing economic conditions as of August 31,
2007. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating
quantities of proved reserves and estimates of reserve quantities and values
must be viewed as being subject to significant change as more data about the
properties becomes available.
All reserves classified as proved as of August 31, 2007 are
associated with our Oakcrest Prospect located in Wharton County, Texas.
|
|
Proved
Reserves
|
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
Undeveloped
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Natural
gas (
Mcf
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,307,601
|
|
|
|
3,307,601
|
|
Oil
(
Bbls
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
106,697
|
|
|
|
106,697
|
|
Total
proved reserves (
Mcfe
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,947,783
|
|
|
|
3,947,783
|
|
From our
inception through August 31, 2007, we have not had natural gas or oil production
arising from or attributable to our oil and gas interests.
Drilling Activity and Productive
Wells
Information
with regard to our drilling activities during the year ended August 31, 2007,
and well status at August 31, 2007 are presented in the following
table:
|
|
At August 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Drilled:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploratory
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Development
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Wells
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Non-productive
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Under testing and
evaluation
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Total
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
All wells drilled during the year ended
August 31, 2007 were drilled in
Texas
in connection with the Shamrock and
Brushy Creek projects. At August 31, 2007, these wells were undergoing
completion operations and testing in order to make a determination of the
productive status of each well.
We did
not drill any wells during the period from our inception through the year ended
August 31, 2006.
Acreage
The
following table summarizes by state our developed and undeveloped acreage as of
August 31, 2007. The term of the undeveloped leasehold acreage ranges from one
to three years. Our Oakcrest Prospect lease acreage located in
Wharton County, Texas expires on September 1, 2008 unless we have commenced and
maintain a continuous drilling schedule, initiate production or negotiate a
renewal with the holder of the mineral rights.
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
Undeveloped
|
|
State
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Kansas
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,800
|
|
|
|
6,864
|
|
Kentucky
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,600
|
|
|
|
4,032
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
|
|
1,099
|
|
Delivery
Commitments
We have
no significant delivery commitments.
Office
Lease
We share office space in
Houston
,
Texas
with Orbit under a month-to-month
arrangement.
The office space is
leased by Orbit. During the years ended August 31, 2007 and 2006, we
paid rent
totaling $42,994
and $38,210, respectively.
Item
3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
We know of no material, active or
pending legal proceedings against us, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any
material proceeding or pending litigation. There are no proceedings in which any
of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial
shareholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our
interest.
Item
4.
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of
Security Holders
|
None.
PART II
Item
5.
|
Market for Common Stock and
Related Stockholder Matters and Small Business Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities
|
Market Price for Common
Stock
Our common stock has been quoted on the
Over The Counter Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”) since July 10, 2006. On
March 8, 2007, we changed our symbol on the OTCBB from “GXPL.OB” to “GWPC.OB”
and our common stock is currently trading on the OTCBB under that
symbol.
The following table sets forth the
range of the high and low closing prices, as reported by the OTCBB, for our
common stock for the periods indicated.
The quotations represent inter-dealer
prices, without retail mark up or commission and may not represent actual
transactions
.
|
|
Sales Price
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended November 30,
2006
|
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended February 28,
2007
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended May 31,
2007
|
|
$
|
0.93
|
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended August 31,
2007
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Our authorized capital stock consists of
1,200,000,000 shares of common stock. As of November 28, 2007,
56,603,107 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding. As of
such date, there were approximately 36 holders of record of our common
stock.
Dividend Policy
We have not paid dividends on our common stock and do not
anticipate paying cash dividends in the immediate future as we contemplate that
our cash flows will be used for continued growth of our
operations. The payment of future dividends, if any, will be
determined by the Board in light of conditions then existing, including our
earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, and restrictions in
financing agreements, business conditions and other factors. However,
the Nevada Revised Statutes do prohibit us from declaring dividends where, after
giving effect to the distribution of the dividend we would not be able to pay
our debts as they become due in the usual course of business; or our total
assets would be less than the sum of our total liabilities, plus the amount that
would be needed to satisfy the rights of shareholders who have preferential
rights superior to those receiving the distribution.
Securities Authorized For Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans
The
following table sets forth information regarding our existing equity
compensation plans as of August 31, 2007.
|
|
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
|
|
Plan
Category
|
|
Number
of securities to be
issued
upon exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
and
rights
(a)
|
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
of outstanding options,
warrants
and rights
(b)
|
|
|
Number
of securities remaining
available
for future issuance under
equity
compensation plans
(excluding
securities reflected in
column
(a))
(c)
|
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders (1)
|
|
|
3,625,000
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
5,375,000
|
|
Total
as of August 31, 2007
|
|
|
3,625,000
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
5,375,000
|
|
|
(1)
|
Consists
of the 2007 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”). The
Plan will be adopted by the Company’s stockholders prior to March 9,
2008.
|
Item
6.
|
Plan of
Operations
|
The
following plan of operations should be read in conjunction with “Business” and
our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in
this Form 10-KSB. In January 2007, we modified our business plan to
concentrate on the acquisition, exploration, development and production of oil
and natural gas projects. We are a development stage company and we
have not earned any operating revenue as of the date of this filing from our
current operations in the oil and natural gas industry. Our plan of
operation is to (i) continue to secure capital funding sufficient to drill a
minimum of two Oakcrest Prospect wells in Texas; (ii) to continue progress on
the development of the gas supply and gathering system for the Mound Branch
Project; and (iii) to complete the drilling and testing of our Frio formation
wells in the Shamrock and Brushy Creek Projects, interconnect the wells and
establish commercial production. We also expect to drill a test
exploration well in Kentucky on the Baxter Bledsoe Prospect.
During
the twelve month period ending August 31, 2008, we project total cash
requirements of approximately $14.4 million. Our total estimated cash
requirements are comprised of approximately $12.8 million for oil and natural
gas exploration, drilling, development and operating expenditures, and $1.6
million for general and administrative, operating and public company expenses,
and working capital requirements.
In
September of 2007, we issued convertible notes in an aggregate principal amount
of $3.7 million to Metage Funds Limited and NCIM Limited which are due in full
on September 10, 2008 unless converted into shares of our common stock prior to
maturity. These notes are secured by a lien on substantially all of
our assets, including our oil and gas lease interests and our equity interests
in our subsidiaries. The stated interest in the notes is 15.0% per
annum with interest for the first six months due on March 10, 2008 and monthly
thereafter until maturity.
Based on our plan of operations, our current available cash is
not sufficient to fund our capital and operating requirements over this twelve
month period. To execute our plans, we will require substantial financing and
are actively working on options to raise equity and/or debt financing through
private placements and public offerings. However, in the event that we are
unable to raise the financing to meet our needs, or if we are able to obtain
sufficient financing from investors or private lenders but it is on commercial
terms unacceptable to us or our stockholders, we will be required to scale back
or slow our capital program. Should we raise funds through equity and debt
placements, existing equity ownership in us could be negatively affected due to
the dilution of existing equity ownership of our shares. If we are
not successful in or unable to repay the $3.7 million principal balance on the
maturity of the notes, since substantially all our assets are pledged as
security to the lenders, we may be unable to continue our business and as a
result may be required to scale back or cease operations for our business, the
result of which would be that our stockholders would lose some or all of their
investment.
Over the
next twelve months, we intend to use substantially all of our available funds to
continue the exploration and development of our oil and natural gas prospect
opportunities, as summarized below:
Estimated Funding
During the Twelve Months Ending August 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration,
drilling, development and operating expenditures
|
|
|
|
Oakcrest
Prospect – Drilling and completion of two Wilcox formation
wells
|
|
$
|
8,900,000
|
|
Shamrock
and Brushy Creek Projects – Drilling and completion of
wells
|
|
|
1,100,000
|
|
Mound
Branch Project – Development of gathering system and reserve development
program
|
|
|
1,300,000
|
|
Baxter
Bledsoe Prospect –Drill initial exploratory well
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
Other
prospects
|
|
|
1,200,000
|
|
Operating,
general and administrative
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
Public
company expenses
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
Working
capital
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,440,000
|
|
We do not
have any off balance sheet financial arrangements.
Item
7
.
|
Financial
Statements
|
INDEX
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
25
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as
of August 31, 2007 and 2006
|
26
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the years ended August 31, 2007 and 2006 and the period
from Inception (January 20, 2005) to August 31, 2007 (Restated)
|
27
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the period from Inception (January 20,
2005) to August 31, 2007
|
28
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows for years ended August 31, 2007 and 2006 and the period from
Inception (January 20, 2005) to August 31, 2007
|
30
|
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements – August 31, 2007
|
32
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of
Directors
Gulf Western Petroleum
Corporation
Houston
,
Texas
We have audited the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets of Gulf Western Petroleum Corporation (a development
stage company) as of August 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the
two years in the period ended August 31, 2007, and the period from inception
(January 20, 2005) to August 31, 2007. These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of Gulf Western’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(
United States
). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit also includes examining,
on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated
financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Gulf Western Petroleum Corporation as of August 31,
2007 and 2006, and the results of operations and cash flows for the years then
ended, and the period from inception (January 20, 2005) to August 31, 2007, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
The accompanying consolidated financial
statements have been prepared assuming that Gulf Western Petroleum Corporation
will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated
financial statements, Gulf Western Petroleum Corporation was formed on January
20, 2005 and has not generated any revenues since inception, which raises
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s
plans in regard to these matters are described in Note 3. The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
As described in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements,
the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the year ended August 31,
2007 have been restated to properly present basic and diluted net loss per
share.
GBH CPAs, PC
|
www.gbhcpas.com
|
Houston
,
Texas
|
|
November 28, 2007 (
April
17, 2008 as to the effects of the restatement described in Note
13)
|
GULF WESTERN PETROLEUM
CORPORATION
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE
COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS
As of August 31, 2007 and
2006
ASSETS
|
|
2007
(Restated)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
1,925
|
|
|
$
|
312,581
|
|
Accounts receivable – joint
interest partners
|
|
|
198,106
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Accounts receivable – related
party
|
|
|
11,488
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
211,519
|
|
|
|
312,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs, net
of amortization
|
|
|
56,123
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Office equipment, net of
depreciation of $6,507 and $1,350, respectively
|
|
|
13,185
|
|
|
|
6,022
|
|
Oil and gas properties, full
cost method:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties subject to
amortization
|
|
|
1,090,988
|
|
|
|
773,016
|
|
Properties not subject to
amortization
|
|
|
10,642,207
|
|
|
|
136,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
12,014,022
|
|
|
$
|
1,228,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
1,065,092
|
|
|
$
|
630,306
|
|
Accounts payable – related
parties
|
|
|
677,402
|
|
|
|
328,047
|
|
Stock payable
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Advances from stockholder
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Due to parent
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
460,231
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
15,041
|
|
|
|
4,765
|
|
Accrued interest – related
party
|
|
|
116,712
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312,500
|
|
Convertible note payable, net
of unamortized debt discount of $11,290 and $-0-, respectively
|
|
|
238,710
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,332,957
|
|
|
|
1,735,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible note – related
party
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Convertible notes payable, net
of unamortized debt discount of $17,536 and $-0-, respectively
|
|
|
482,464
|
|
|
|
76,883
|
|
Asset retirement
obligation
|
|
|
50,949
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
4,866,370
|
|
|
|
1,812,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(DEFICIT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, $0.001 par
value, 1.2 billion shares authorized, 53,489,662 and 25,000,000 shares
issued and outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
53,490
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
10,911,412
|
|
|
|
(24,000
|
)
|
Deficit accumulated during the
development stage
|
|
|
(3,817,250
|
)
|
|
|
(585,126
|
)
|
Total stockholders’ equity
(deficit)
|
|
|
7,147,652
|
|
|
|
(584,126
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
|
$
|
12,014,022
|
|
|
$
|
1,228,606
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these consolidated financial statements.
GULF WESTERN PETROLEUM
CORPORATION
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE
COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS
For the Years Ended August 31, 2007 and
2006
and the Period from Inception (January
20, 2005) through August 31, 2007
|
|
Year Ended
August 31, 2007
(
Restated
)
|
|
|
Year Ended
August 31, 2006
|
|
|
Inception
through
August 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2,680,342
|
|
|
|
60,958
|
|
|
|
2,741,449
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
5,157
|
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
|
|
6,507
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
2,685,499
|
|
|
|
62,308
|
|
|
|
2,747,956
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(2,685,499
|
)
|
|
|
(62,308
|
)
|
|
|
(2,747,956
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing costs
|
|
|
(118,017
|
)
|
|
|
278,517
|
|
|
|
389,095
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
663,306
|
|
|
|
4,765
|
|
|
|
668,071
|
|
Currency exchange loss
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
|
|
10,792
|
|
|
|
12,128
|
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
546,625
|
|
|
|
294,074
|
|
|
|
1,069,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(3,232,124
|
)
|
|
$
|
(356,382
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,817,250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
42,052,238
|
|
|
|
25,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these consolidated financial statements.
GULF
WESTERN PETROLEUM CORPORATION
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
For
the Period from Inception (January 20, 2005) through August 31,
2007
|
|
Common
Shares
|
|
|
Par
Amount
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-In-Capital
|
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares at
inception
|
|
|
25,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
(24,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
Net loss, inception through
August 31, 2005
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(228,744
|
)
|
|
|
(228,744
|
)
|
Balance, August 31, 2005
|
|
|
25,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
(24,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(228,744
|
)
|
|
$
|
(227,744
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(356,382
|
)
|
|
|
(356,382
|
)
|
Balance, August 31, 2006
|
|
|
25,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
(24,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(585,126
|
)
|
|
$
|
(584,126
|
)
|
Issuance of common shares to
related party for oil and gas properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
October 16, 2006 ($0.09 per
share)
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
455,496
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
460,496
|
|
Balance, January 3, 2007
(prior to reverse merger)
|
|
|
30,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
431,496
|
|
|
$
|
(585,126
|
)
|
|
$
|
(123,630
|
)
|
Common shares recapitalized
for reverse merger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
January 3, 2007 ($0.001 per
share)
|
|
|
27,645,000
|
|
|
|
27,645
|
|
|
|
(27,645
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cancellation of shares on
reverse merger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
January 3, 2007 ($0.001 per
share)
|
|
|
(15,645,000
|
)
|
|
|
(15,645
|
)
|
|
|
15,645
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance, January 3, 2007
(after reverse merger)
|
|
|
42,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
42,000
|
|
|
$
|
419,496
|
|
|
$
|
(585,126
|
)
|
|
$
|
(123,630
|
)
|
Issuance of common shares for
debenture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
January 3, 2007 ($0.73 per
share)
|
|
|
108,109
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
78,369
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
78,477
|
|
Beneficial conversion feature
of debentures
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
75,390
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
75,390
|
|
Issuance of common shares to
related party for oil and gas properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
January 30, 2007 ($1.00 per
share)
|
|
|
4,039,053
|
|
|
|
4,039
|
|
|
|
4,035,014
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,039,053
|
|
Issuance of units for cash in
private placement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
January 22, 2007 ($1.00 per
unit)
|
|
|
3,205,000
|
|
|
|
3,205
|
|
|
|
3,201,795
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,205,000
|
|
-
May 10, 2007 ($1.00 per
unit)
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
524,475
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
-
August 16, 2007 ($0.40 per
unit)
|
|
|
1,712,500
|
|
|
|
1,713
|
|
|
|
683,287
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
685,000
|
|
-
August 31, 2007 ($0.40 per
unit)
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
399,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
Issuance of warrants for
services in private placement
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13,138
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13,138
|
|
Issuance of common shares for
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
May 10, 2007 ($0.72 per
share)
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
359,500
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
-
August 1, 2007 ($0.31 per
share)
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
30,400
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30,500
|
|
Issuance of common shares
under terms of and extension of notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
May 10, 2007 ($1.00 per
share)
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
199,800
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
-
August 31, 2007 ($1.00 per
share)
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
99,900
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Amortization of stock
options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
738,599
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
738,599
|
|
Fair value of warrants issued
in conjunction with loans
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
53,249
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
53,249
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,232,124
|
)
|
|
|
(3,232,124
|
)
|
Balance, August 31, 2007
|
|
|
53,489,662
|
|
|
$
|
53,490
|
|
|
$
|
10,911,412
|
|
|
$
|
(3,817,250
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,147,652
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
GULF WESTERN PETROLEUM
CORPORATION
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE
COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS
For the Years Ended August 31, 2007 and
2006
and the Period from Inception (January
20, 2005) through August 31, 2007
|
|
Year Ended
August 31, 2007
|
|
|
Year Ended
August 31, 2006
|
|
|
Inception through
August 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(3,232,124
|
)
|
|
$
|
(356,382
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,817,250
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
loss to cash provided (used) by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
5,157
|
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
|
|
6,507
|
|
Foreign currency exchange
loss
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
|
|
10,792
|
|
|
|
12,128
|
|
Amortization of debt
discount
|
|
|
99,813
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
99,813
|
|
Amortization of deferred
financing costs
|
|
|
7,015
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,015
|
|
Bonus shares on notes
payable
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
Issuance of shares for
services
|
|
|
390,500
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
390,500
|
|
Amortization of stock option
expense
|
|
|
738,599
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
738,599
|
|
Net change in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable – joint
interest partners
|
|
|
(198,106
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(198,106
|
)
|
Accounts receivable – related
parties
|
|
|
(11,488
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(11,488
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
434,786
|
|
|
|
426,570
|
|
|
|
1,059,136
|
|
Accounts payable - related
parties
|
|
|
349,355
|
|
|
|
177,396
|
|
|
|
677,402
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
10,276
|
|
|
|
4,765
|
|
|
|
15,041
|
|
Accrued interest – related
parties
|
|
|
116,712
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
116,712
|
|
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED (USED) BY
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(888,169
|
)
|
|
|
264,491
|
|
|
|
(503,991
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and
equipment
|
|
|
(12,320
|
)
|
|
|
(7,372
|
)
|
|
|
(19,692
|
)
|
Investment in oil and gas
properties
|
|
|
(4,732,925
|
)
|
|
|
(329,085
|
)
|
|
|
(5,181,697
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(4,745,245
|
)
|
|
|
(336,457
|
)
|
|
|
(5,201,389
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from stockholder
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
Proceeds from private
placement unit sales
|
|
|
4,815,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,815,000
|
|
Proceeds from convertible
notes payable
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
72,047
|
|
|
|
772,047
|
|
Proceeds from notes
payable
|
|
|
540,776
|
|
|
|
312,500
|
|
|
|
853,276
|
|
Repayment of notes payable
|
|
|
(853,018
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(853,018
|
)
|
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
5,322,758
|
|
|
|
384,547
|
|
|
|
5,707,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE(DECREASE) IN
CASH
|
|
|
(310,656
|
)
|
|
|
312,581
|
|
|
|
1,925
|
|
Cash, beginning of period
|
|
|
312,581
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cash, end of period
|
|
$
|
1,925
|
|
|
$
|
312,581
|
|
|
$
|
1,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
22,929
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
22,929
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Schedule of
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of founders
shares
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
Assignment and rescission of
oil and gas properties from parent
|
|
|
(460,231
|
)
|
|
|
460,231
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Convertible note to related
party for acquisition of oil and gas interests
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
Common shares issued to
acquire oil and gas properties
|
|
|
4,499,549
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,499,549
|
|
Issuance of common shares for
convertible debentures
|
|
|
78,477
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
78,477
|
|
Asset retirement obligation
incurred
|
|
|
50,949
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
50,949
|
|
Fair value of warrants issued
with debt
|
|
|
66,387
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
66,387
|
|
Discount on debt for
beneficial conversion feature of debentures
|
|
$
|
75,390
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
75,390
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these consolidated financial statements
GULF WESTERN PETROLEUM
CORPORATION
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE
COMPANY)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
OPERATIONS
Gulf Western Petroleum Corporation
(“Gulf Western”) was incorporated on February 21, 2006 in the State of
Nevada
. Gulf Western
(formerly Georgia Exploration, Inc.) is engaged in the acquisition, exploration
and development of oil and natural gas reserves in the
United States
. Gulf Western holds oil and
gas lease interests in
Texas
,
Kansas
and
Kentucky
. Gulf Western is actively
engaged in the drilling of Frio formation wells in Dewitt and
Lavaca County
,
Texas
; it holds proved undeveloped reserves
in
Wharton
County
,
Texas
; and it is engaged in a supply and
infrastructure development program in
Southeast Kansas
. Gulf Western’s oil and gas lease
interests in
Kentucky
are exploration in
nature.
On January 3, 2007, Gulf Western and
Wharton Resources Corp. (“Wharton” or “Wharton Corp.”) consummated a merger that
was effected through a reverse merger with the oil and gas lease interests and
reserves held by Wharton becoming the primary core assets of Gulf
Western. Concurrent with the merger, Wharton’s executive
management and directors assumed control and responsibility for Gulf Western’s
activities and its strategic direction. The merger effected a
change in control of Gulf Western and immediately following the merger,
Wharton’s former stockholders held approximately 71.4% of Gulf Western’s issued
and outstanding common shares. On March 8, 2007, Georgia
Exploration, Inc.’s name was changed to Gulf Western Petroleum Corporation, and
the stock symbol was changed to OTCBB: GWPC.
For Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”)
reporting
purposes, the merger between Gulf Western and Wharton was treated as a reverse
merger with Wharton being the “accounting acquirer” and, accordingly, it assumed
Gulf Western’s reporting obligations with the SEC. In accordance with
SEC requirements, the historical financial statements and related disclosures
presented herein for the period prior to the date of merger (i.e., January 3,
2007) are those of Wharton since its inception on January 20,
2005. In conjunction with the merger, each outstanding share of
Wharton was converted into 25,000 common shares in Gulf Western with a total of
30,000,000 common shares issued to the former Wharton stockholders.
Of the 27,645,000 shares of Gulf
Western outstanding at the time of the merger,
15,645,000 shares of Gulf Western’s
outstanding common stock were cancelled concurrent with the closing of the
merger. Immediately following the merger, a total of 42,000,000
shares of common stock were issued and outstanding. Wharton assumed
the net liabilities of Gulf Western totaling $66,631 which were recorded as an
expense on the date of merger.
Since its inception, Gulf Western has
funded its oil and gas activities through a combination of equity and debt
securities, and the contribution of funds and services by its principal
shareholders and Gulf Western’s management. Gulf Western has
raised initial financing from external sources through a series of private
equity placements with units consisting of common shares and warrants; the
issuance of convertible securities in the form of secured notes; and through
various bridge and short term notes.
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of
presentation
Gulf Western’s consolidated balance
sheets and related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity
(deficit) and cash flows for the periods from inception through August 31, 2007
are presented in U.S. dollars and have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(“GAAP”) and the rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
The accompanying consolidated financial
statements are prepared in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (“SFAS”) No. 7, Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage
Enterprises.
Use of
estimates
The preparation of financial statements
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States
requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could materially differ from those
estimates.
Management believes that it is
reasonably possible the following material estimates affecting the financial
statements could significantly change in the coming year: (1)
estimates of proved oil and gas reserves, and (2) forecast forward price curves
for natural gas and crude oil. The oil and gas industry in the
United States
has historically experienced
substantial commodity price volatility, and such volatility is expected to
continue in the future. Commodity prices affect the level of
reserves that are considered commercially recoverable; significantly influence
Gulf Western’s current and future expected cash flows; and impact the PV10
derivation of proved reserves presented in Gulf Western’s supplemental oil and
gas reserve disclosures made herein.
Reclassification
Certain amounts in prior periods have
been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.
Principles of
consolidation
The consolidated balance sheets include
the accounts of Gulf Western Petroleum Corporation and its 100% owned subsidiary
Wharton Resources Corp., a Delaware corporation; its 100% member interest in
Wharton Resources LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and its direct and
indirect interests in Gulf Western Petroleum, LP, a Texas limited partnership
(“Gulf Western LP”). Gulf Western LP is Gulf Western’s primary
operating entity and Wharton Resources LLC holds a 1.0% general partner interest
in Gulf Western LP while the remaining 99.0% is held by Gulf Western through
limited partner interests.
Cash and cash
equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash
in banks and certificates of deposit which mature within three months of the
date of purchase. Gulf Western may, in the normal course of
operations, maintain cash balances in excess of federally insured
limits.
Accounts receivable
Gulf Western routinely assesses the
recoverability of all material trade, joint interest and other receivables. Gulf
Western accrues a reserve on a receivable when, based on the judgment of
management, it is probable that a receivable will not be collected and the
amount of any reserve may be reasonably estimated. Actual write-offs
may exceed the recorded allowance. No allowance for doubtful accounts
was considered necessary at August 31, 2007 and 2006.
Oil and gas
properties
Gulf Western follows the full cost method of accounting for its
oil and natural gas properties, whereby all costs incurred in connection with
the acquisition, exploration for and development of petroleum and natural gas
reserves are capitalized. Such costs include lease acquisition,
geological and geophysical activities, rentals on non-producing leases,
drilling, completing and equipping of oil and gas wells and administrative costs
directly attributable to those activities and asset retirement costs.
Disposition of oil and gas properties are accounted for as a reduction of
capitalized costs, with no gain or loss recognized unless such adjustment would
significantly alter the relationship between capital costs and proved reserves
of oil and gas, in which case the gain or loss is recognized to income.
Depletion and depreciation of proved oil
and gas properties is calculated on the units-of-production method based upon
estimates of proved reserves. Such calculations include the estimated
future costs to developed proved reserves. Oil and gas reserves are
converted to a common unit of measure based on the energy content of 6,000 cubic
feet of gas to one barrel of oil. Costs of undeveloped properties are not
included in the costs subject to depletion. These costs are assessed
periodically for impairment.
Ceiling
test
In applying the full cost method, Gulf
Western performs an impairment test (ceiling test) at each reporting date,
whereby the carrying value of property and equipment is compared to the
“estimated present value,” of its proved reserves discounted at a 10-percent
interest rate of future net revenues, based on current economic and operating
conditions, plus the cost of properties not being amortized, plus the lower of
cost or fair market value of unproved properties included in costs being
amortized, less the income tax effects related to book and tax basis differences
of the properties. As of August 31, 2007 and 2006, no impairment of
oil and gas properties was recorded.
Oil and gas properties, not subject to
amortization
Gulf Western holds oil and gas interests
in
Texas
,
Kansas
and
Kentucky
pursuant to lease
agreements. Gulf Western is currently drilling Frio formation wells
in Dewitt and
Lavaca
County
,
Texas
. Upon completion of drilling
and initial well production from the
Frio
formation wells, Gulf Western will
commence amortization (on a unit-of-production basis) of the acquisition,
geological and geophysical, drilling and development costs incurred and included
in oil and gas properties.
The amortization of the oil and gas
properties not classified as proved begins when the oil and gas properties
become proved, or their values become impaired. Gulf Western
assesses the realizability of its properties not characterized as proved on at
least an annual basis or when there is or has been an indication that an
impairment in value may have occurred. The impairment of properties
not classified as proved is assessed based on management’s intention with regard
to future exploration and development of individually significant properties,
and Gulf Western’s ability to secure capital funding to finance such exploration
and development. If the result of an assessment indicates that
a property is impaired, the amount of the impairment is added to the capitalized
costs in its full cost pool and they are amortized over production from proved
reserves.
Furniture and office
equipment
Furniture and office equipment is stated
at cost. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated
useful lives of three to five years.
Debt
Gulf Western accounts for debt at fair
value and recognizes interest expense for accrued interest payable under the
terms of the debt. Principal and interest payments due within one year are
classified as current, whereas principal and interest payments for periods
beyond one year are classified as long term. Beneficial conversion features of
debt are valued and the related amounts recorded as discounts on the
debt. Discounts are amortized to interest expense using the effective
interest method over the term of the debt. Any unamortized discount
upon settlement or conversion of debt is recognized immediately as interest
expense.
Asset retirement
obligations
In accordance with SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations” Gulf Western records the fair value of a liability for
asset retirement obligations (“ARO”) in the period in which an obligation is
incurred and a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related
long-lived asset. The present value of the estimated asset retirement cost is
capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset and is
depreciated over the useful life of the asset. The settlement date
fair value is discounted at Gulf Western’s credit adjusted risk-free rate in
determining the abandonment liability. The abandonment liability is
accreted with the passage of time to its expected settlement fair value. At
August 31, 2007, Gulf Western has recorded an estimated asset retirement
obligation of $50,949. No liabilities were settled during the period
and no accretion expense has been recognized.
Foreign exchange
Balance sheet items are translated into
U.S. dollars at exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet date for monetary
items and at exchange rates in effect at the transaction date for non-monetary
items. Operating statement items are translated at average rates prevailing
during the period. Gains and losses on translation of current monetary assets
and liabilities are included in income.
Future income taxes
Income taxes are accounted for using the
asset/liability method of income tax allocation. Future income taxes are
recognized for the future income tax consequences attributable to differences
between the carrying values of assets and liabilities and their respective
income tax bases. Future income tax assets and liabilities are measured using
income tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on
future income tax assets and liabilities of a change in income tax rates is
included in earnings in the period that such change in income tax rates is
enacted. Future income tax assets are recorded in the financial statements if
realization is considered more likely than not.
Revenue and cost
recognition
Gulf Western uses the sales method to account for sales of
crude oil and natural gas. Under this method, revenues are recognized based on
actual volumes of oil and gas sold to purchasers. The volumes sold may differ
from the volumes to which Gulf Western is entitled based on our interest in the
properties. These differences create imbalances which are recognized
as a liability only when the imbalance exceeds the estimate of remaining
reserves. Gulf Western had no production, revenue or imbalances as of
August 31, 2007 and August 31, 2006. Costs associated with production
are expensed in the period incurred.
Stock-based
compensation
The Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” which establishes standards for
the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity
instruments for goods or services. Gulf Western utilizes
SFAS No. 123R and related Interpretations for fair value determination and
recognition for share based compensation granted to directors, officers, and
employees. Under SFAS 123R, compensation cost for all share
based payments granted are based on the grant date fair value estimated in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS no. 123R.
Compensation cost is recognized on a
straight line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. If at any date the
portion of the grant-date fair value of the award that is vested is greater than
that amount recognized on a straight line basis, the amount of the vested grant
date fair value is recognized. Gulf Western also accounts for
transactions in which we issue equity instruments to acquire goods or services
from non-employees in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R (as
amended). These transactions are accounted for based on the fair
value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments
issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.
Earnings per share
Basic net earnings (loss) per common
share are computed by dividing net earnings (loss) available to common
shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during
the period. Diluted net earnings (loss) per common share is determined using the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, adjusted
for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents. In periods when losses are
reported, the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding excludes
common stock equivalents, because their inclusion would be
anti-dilutive.
The dilutive effect of outstanding stock
options and warrants is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application
of the treasury stock method. The dilutive effect of outstanding convertible
securities is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the
if-converted method. For the years ended August 31, 2007 and 2006,
fully diluted earnings per share excludes common stock equivalents, because
their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
Fair value of financial
instruments
The carrying value of cash and cash
equivalents, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other liabilities
approximates fair value due to the short term maturity of these instruments. The
carrying value of the notes payable, convertible notes and convertible
debentures approximate their fair value as August 31, 2007 and August 31,
2006.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), which clarifies the definition
of fair value, establishes guidelines for measuring fair value, and expands
disclosures regarding fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does not
require any new fair value measurements and eliminates inconsistencies in
guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157
will be effective for Gulf Western on September 1, 2008. Gulf Western is
currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 157 on its financial position,
cash flows, and results of operations.
NOTE 3 – GOING
CONCERN
Gulf Western is in its development stage
and, accordingly, has limited operations and no revenues. Gulf
Western has raised limited financing and has incurred operating losses since its
inception in January 2005. These factors raise substantial doubt
about Gulf Western’s ability to continue as a going
concern. Gulf Western’s ability to achieve and maintain
profitability and positive cash flow is dependent on its ability to secure
sufficient financing to fund the acquisition, drilling and development of
profitable oil and gas properties. Management is seeking financing
that it believes would allow Gulf Western to establish and sustain commercial
production. There are no assurances that Gulf Western will be
able to obtain additional financing from investors or private lenders and, if
available, such financing may not be on commercial terms acceptable to Gulf
Western or its stockholders. The financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
NOTE 4 - RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
During Gulf Western’s formation and
development to date, it has had transactions with the current directors,
executive officers and shareholders holding interests in excess of 10.0%. These
transactions are as follows:
Oakcrest Prospect,
Wharton County
,
Texas
In connection with the reverse merger of
Gulf Western and Wharton Corp., Gulf Western acquired oil and gas lease
interests located in
Wharton County
,
Texas
. The Oakcrest oil and gas
lease interests were originally acquired by CodeAmerica Investments LLC
(“CodeAmerica”), a company controlled by Wm. Milton Cox, the current Chairman
and CEO of Gulf Western. When Wharton Corp. acquired the
Oakcrest oil and gas lease interests from CodeAmerica on October 16, 2006, Wm.
Milton Cox was the Chairman and CEO of Wharton Corp. CodeAmerica
received 5,000,000 shares of common stock in Gulf Western for its Oakcrest oil
and gas lease interests.
Consistent with SEC requirements for
entities under common control, the acquisition of the Oakcrest oil and gas lease
interests from CodeAmerica has been recorded on Gulf Western’s records at its
historical cost basis in the interests which totaled approximately
$460,500. When the Oakcrest lease interests were acquired by Wharton
Corp., Wharton Corp. shares of common stock were not publicly
traded. The fair value of the shares issued to CodeAmerica for the
lease interests was equal to its historical cost basis in the lease
interests.
Mound Branch Project,
Elk County
,
Kansas
On January 30, 2007, Gulf Western
purchased Orbit Energy, LLC’s (“Orbit”) working and net revenue interests in
approximately 8,800 gross acres located in Elk County, Kansas together with its
interests in drilled wells and associated equipment (the “Mound Branch
Project”). Gulf Western’s purchase price totaled $6.8 million,
and consideration paid to Orbit was comprised of: a) $760,947 of funds advanced
by Gulf Western to Orbit for testing and evaluation of the existing well bores,
reservoir formations and associated lease acreage; b) a thirty-six month $2.0
million 10% convertible note with principal due at maturity; and c) 4,039,053
common shares of Gulf Western with a fair value of $1.00 per common share at the
time of issuance.
The Gulf Western shares issued to Orbit
for the purchase were placed in escrow (“Orbit Escrow Shares”) to be released
upon Orbit's delivery to the escrow agent of an independent report assessing the
fair value of the purchased assets at no less than the purchase price of $6.8
million. Should the valuation be less than the $6.8 million purchase
price, then the
number of
shares to be released from escrow will be ratably reduced for the lower
valuation. Gulf Western shares remaining in escrow at the end of the
twelve month period ending January 30, 2008 are to be cancelled and returned to
Gulf Western’s treasury. To date no shares have been released
from escrow.
Orbit is controlled by entities owned and managed by
significant shareholders of Gulf Western, who are also directors and senior
officers of Gulf Western. Wm. Milton Cox and Bassam Nastat
collectively own 100% of Orbit through Mr. Cox’s ownership of CodeAmerica
Investments LLC (“CodeAmerica”), and Mr. Nastat’s management of Paragon Capital,
LLC (“Paragon”). Mr. Cox’s, Gulf Western’s Chairman and CEO, and Mr.
Nastat’s, Gulf Western’s President and Director, direct and indirect holdings in
Gulf Western as of January 31, 2008 total 26,539,053 shares of the issued and
outstanding common stock, or 46.9% of the total outstanding common stock on that
date. Messrs. Cox and Nastat through their director and senior
officer positions in Gulf Western, and their holdings in Gulf Western
collectively exercise substantive control over Gulf Western and 100% control
over Orbit.
Immediately prior to the acquisition of Mound Branch from Orbit
on January 30, 2007, Messrs. Cox and Nastat held a combined 22,500,000 shares of
common stock, or 49.7% of the then issued and outstanding common shares of Gulf
Western. The 4,039,053 common shares (i.e., the Orbit Escrow Shares)
issued to Orbit increased Messrs. Cox’s and Nastat’s combined direct
and indirect holdings in Gulf Western to 53.8% of the then issued and
outstanding shares of common stock. Should the independent fair
market appraisal of the assets acquired be less than the purchase price, the
shares of common stock released to Orbit will be ratably reduced for the lower
valuation, and Messrs. Cox’s and Nastat’s combined direct and indirect holdings
of Gulf Western shares of common stock will be reduced.
The Mound Branch Project acquisition was accounted for at fair
value of $6.8 million in accordance with the Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
No. 02-5 (“EITF 02-5”) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board on
discussions dated March 20-21, 2002 and June 19-20, 2002. The
referenced EITF 02-5 is the authoritative accounting literature that provides
the threshold measure of 50% in establishing common control for purposes of
determining whether assets acquired from entities under effective common control
are to be recorded at the fair value of the assets acquired or the seller’s
historical cost in the assets acquired. The seller’s
historical cost in the Mound Branch assets acquired by Gulf Western totaled
approximately $3.2 million.
Orbit serves as operator of the Mound
Branch Project. In conjunction with the terms of the Mound
Branch Project purchase and sale agreement, Gulf Western has been funding 100%
of the costs incurred by Orbit for the testing and evaluation of the existing
well bores, reservoir formations and associated lease acreage. The
share of costs not attributable to Gulf Western’s working interest ownership in
the property is recorded as a receivable from joint interest partners in the
amount of $198,006. Gulf Western expects to collect this amount from
its partners in the Mound Branch Project.
In addition to the $760,747 paid by Gulf Western and applied as
consideration against the purchase price from Orbit, Orbit has billed $636,684
to Gulf Western associated with the testing and evaluation of the Mound Branch
Project since Gulf Western’s acquisition. A balance of $248,171 is
recorded as payable to related party as at August 31, 2007. In the
aggregate through August 31, 2007 Gulf Western has incurred costs totaling
$1,397,631 on the testing and evaluation of the Mound Branch Project of which
$1,149,460 has been paid to Orbit. The testing and evaluation
procedures for the Mound Branch Project were substantially completed in early
October 2007. Gulf Western is continuing with its Mound Branch
Project reserve and infrastructure development program, and is actively pursuing
financing that would provide for the initiation of the next phase of the
project.
Baxter Bledsoe Prospect,
Clay
County
,
Kentucky
On February 1, 2006, Gulf Western purchased the Baxter Bledsoe
Prospect oil and gas lease acreage from CodeAmerica for a cash purchase price of
$330,000. The prospect has approximately 2,200 acres located in Clay County,
Kentucky. This acquisition from CodeAmerica was accounted for at fair value as
provided for in EITF 02-5 with the cash purchase price recorded as lease
acquisition costs. The seller’s historical cost basis of the lease
interests acquired totaled approximately $170,000.
Bell
Prospect,
Bell County
,
Kentucky
On October 1, 2006, Gulf Western
purchased CodeAmerica's oil and gas lease interests located in
Bell County
,
Kentucky
. The Bell Prospect is comprised of
approximately 3,400 acres. The cash purchase price was $314,475, which included
$59,475 for land, legal and title services expended by CodeAmerica on the
prospect. This acquisition from CodeAmerica was accounted for at fair
value as provided for in EITF 02-5 with the cash purchase price recorded as
lease acquisition costs. The seller’s historical cost basis of the lease
interests acquired totaled approximately $229,475.
Advances from
Stockholder
During the months of April and May 2007,
CodeAmerica made cash advances to Gulf Western totaling $120,000 for general
working capital requirements. The advances were due on
demand, did not bear interest and were outstanding at August 31,
2007. The advances were fully repaid in November
2007.
Office Rent
Gulf Western shares office space in
Houston
,
Texas
with Orbit under a month-to-month
lease. The office space was leased by Orbit and during the years
ended August 31, 2007 and 2006 Gulf Western paid rent totaling $42,994 and
$38,210, respectively.
NOTE 5 – OIL AND GAS
PROPERTIES
All of the Gulf Western’s oil and gas
properties are located in the
United States
. No amortization of expense
was recorded in 2007 or 2006 as no production or sales
occurred.
Costs excluded from amortization at
August 31, 2007 are as follows:
Fiscal
Year
Incurred
|
|
Acquisition
Costs
|
|
|
Exploration
Costs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
|
2007
|
|
|
5,798,720
|
|
|
|
4,831,487
|
|
|
|
10,630,207
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,810,720
|
|
|
$
|
4,831,487
|
|
|
$
|
10,642,207
|
|
Gulf Western holds oil and gas lease
interests in
Texas
,
Kentucky
and
Kansas
. The leases are classified
as “Properties not subject to amortization” in Gulf Western’s financial
statements. Gulf Western expects that these costs will be included in
oil and gas properties subject to amortization upon evaluation of proved
reserves in fiscal 2008.
NOTE 6 – INCOME
TAXES
Deferred income taxes are recorded at
the expected tax rate of 35%. SFAS No. 109 “Accounting for Income
Taxes” requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if
it is more or likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset
will not be realized.
Reconciliation between actual tax
expense (benefit) and income taxes computed by apply the combined U.S. federal
income tax rate and state income tax rate to income from continuing operations
before income taxes and deemed dividends is as follows:
|
|
August 31,
2007
|
|
|
August 31,
2006
|
|
Computed at
U.S.
and State statutory
rates
|
|
$
|
(1,131,200
|
)
|
|
$
|
(121,000
|
)
|
Permanent
differences
|
|
|
885,200
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Changes in valuation
allowance
|
|
|
246,000
|
|
|
|
121,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31,
2007
|
|
|
August 31,
2006
|
|
Deferred tax asset attributable
to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating
loss
|
|
$
|
445,000
|
|
|
$
|
199,000
|
|
Less: valuation
allowance
|
|
|
(445,000
|
)
|
|
|
(199,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
The components giving rise to the
deferred tax assets described above have been included in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as noncurrent assets. As of August 31,
2007 and 2006, the deferred tax assets are net of a full valuation allowance of
$445,000 and $199,000, respectively based on the amount that management believes
will ultimately be realized. Realization of deferred tax assets is
dependent upon sufficient future taxable income during the period that
deductible temporary differences and carryforwards are expected to be available
to reduce taxable income. At August 31, 2007, Gulf Western had loss
carryforwards of approximately $1.3 million for tax purposes which will begin to
expire in 2025. The valuation allowance increased by approximately $246,000 and
$121,000 for the years ended August, 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Section
382 of the Internal Revenue Code will limit the amounts historical net operating
losses available for tax purposes prior to the reverse
merger.
The income tax provision differs from
the amount of income determined by applying the
U.S.
federal income tax rate to pretax
income for the years ended August 31, 2007 and 2006 primarily due to the
valuation allowance. The above estimates are based upon management’s
decisions concerning certain elections which could change the relationship
between net income and taxable income. Management decisions are
made annually and could cause the estimates to vary
significantly.
NOTE 7 – NOTES PAYABLE AND CONVERTIBLE
UNSECURED DEBENTURES
Convertible Secured
Note
On July 3, 2007, Gulf Western borrowed
$500,000 under an eighteen-month convertible secured note from a private
investor with a maturity date of January 3,
2009. Principal repayments were due beginning October
2007 at $33,333 per month. The loan bore interest at a rate of
12.0% per annum, payable quarterly, and could be repaid in portion or in full at
any time at 105% of the then outstanding principal and accrued
interest. The note provided the lender the right to convert any or
all of the outstanding balance to Gulf Western shares of common stock at a
conversion rate of $0.45 per common share during the loan
term. Attached to the note were three-year warrants for 125,000
common shares of Gulf Western at $0.30 per common share.
Gulf Western evaluated the terms of the
convertible note and attached warrants in accordance with EITF 98-5 and EITF
00-27 and concluded that there was no beneficial conversion
feature. The relative fair value of the warrants under the
Black-Scholes option pricing model was $21,196, which was recorded as debt
discount on the convertible note and amortized using the effective interest
method over the eighteen-month term of the note. The parameters used
in the Black-Scholes valuation model were: a risk-free interest rate of 4.90%;
the current stock price on the date of issuance of $0.27 per common share; the
exercise price of the warrants of $0.30 per share of common stock; an expected
term of three years; volatility of 107.61%; and a dividend yield of
0.0%. For the year ending August 31, 2007, $3,660 was charged
to interest expense associated with the amortization of the debt discount, and
$17,536 debt discount was unamortized at August 31, 2007.
This note was refinanced subsequent to
year end in connection with the $3.7 million Senior Secured Convertible
Notes. As a result, the current portion of the Convertible
Secured Note was excluded from current liabilities as of August 31,
2007.
In connection with the July 3, 2007
convertible secured note, Gulf Western issued warrants to purchase 100,000
shares of common stock to a placement agent, and paid the placement agent a fee
totaling $50,000. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.40
per share and a term of two years. The placement agent warrants were
valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The
assumptions used in the Black-Scholes valuation model were: a risk-free interest
rate of 4.89%; the current stock price at date of issuance of $0.27 per common
share; the exercise price of the warrants of $0.40 per share of common stock; an
expected term of two years; volatility of 107.6%; and dividend yield of
0.0%. The estimated fair value of the warrants was
$13,138. The fair value of the warrants and the $50,000 fee was
recorded as deferred financing cost and is being amortized using the effective
interest method over the life of the debt.
Short-Term Convertible
Note
On June 28, 2007, Gulf Western borrowed
$250,000 under a short term convertible note payable with a private
investor. The note bore interest at 12.0% per annum; was
convertible at $0.45 per share of common stock; and provided for a payment on
maturity or upon the occurrence of certain events; but no later than September
28, 2007. This note and accrued interest was repaid on
September 14, 2007. In connection with this loan Gulf Western
issued to the lender warrants to purchase 200,000 common shares of Gulf Western
at an exercise price of $0.32 per share with a three year
term.
Gulf Western evaluated the terms of the
convertible note and attached warrants in accordance with EITF 98-5 and EITF
00-27 and concluded that there was no beneficial conversion
feature. The relative fair value of the warrants attached to
the loan that was derived through use of the Black-Scholes option pricing model
was $32,053, which was recorded as a discount on the note and amortized over the
life of the note. The parameters used in the Black-Scholes
valuation model were: a risk-free interest rate of 4.98%; the current stock
price on the date of issuance of $0.28 per common share; the exercise price of
the warrants of $0.32 per share; an expected term of three years; volatility of
108.79%; and a dividend yield of 0.0%. At August 31,
2007, $20,763 of the loan discount was charged to interest
expense. Upon repayment of the loan on September 14, 2007 the
remaining unamortized loan discount totaling $11,290 was charged to interest
expense.
Orbit Energy, LLC Mound Branch
Convertible Note
As consideration to Orbit Energy, LLC
for Gulf Western’s purchase of its interests in the Mound Branch Project, Gulf
Western issued a thirty-six month $2.0 million unsecured convertible note dated
January 30, 2007 with principal due at maturity, bearing interest at 10.0% per
annum due quarterly in arrears. Pursuant to the terms of the
convertible note, after the initial twelve months: a) Orbit has the ability to
convert the outstanding principal and interest balance into common shares at a
conversion price of $1.00 per common share, and b) Gulf Western may prepay all
or a portion of the convertible loan without penalty. Under the terms
of the convertible note, the maturity of the note is accelerated upon a change
in control of Gulf Western. On July 3, 2007 the note was amended to
provide that interest payable for the first two quarters to be due on October
30, 2007. As of October 30, 2007, no interest has been paid and no
new arrangements have been made for an extension. There are no
penalty provisions in the note for non-payment. At August 31, 2007
the outstanding principal under the note is $2.0 million and accrued interest
totals $116,712.
Gulf Western evaluated the terms of the
convertible note in accordance with EITF 98-5 and EITF 00-27 and concluded that
the note contained no beneficial conversion features.
Wharton Notes
Payable
Wharton entered into three short term loan agreements dated
August 21, 2006 that provided for total borrowings of $500,000 for general
working capital purposes. The loans had a 90-day maturity; bore
interest at 10.0% per annum with principal and interest due upon maturity; and
were secured by all existing and after acquired assets of
Wharton. The loan agreements provided for the issuance of 150,000
shares of common stock (“Bonus Shares”) to the lenders in the event that Wharton
completed a public transaction. The loans also provided that
Wharton could extend the loans for 90-days under the same terms and conditions
for an additional 150,000 Bonus Shares. Wharton elected to extend the
loan maturities. At August 31, 2006, $312,500 had been funded to
Wharton under the loan agreements with the remaining funds received during the
month of September 2006. During the year ending August 31, 2007
the loans were fully repaid to the lenders. During the fiscal quarter
ending February 28, 2007, the triggering event occurred and the notes were
extended to effect the issuance of the Bonus Shares, and Gulf Western recorded a
non-cash interest charge totaling $300,000 for the fair value of the Bonus Share
commitment to the lenders. As of August 31, 2007, 200,000 Bonus
Shares have been issued to the lenders, and 100,000 Bonus Shares remain unissued
and are recorded as stock payable.
On October 17, 2006, Wharton entered
into a short term loan agreement for $350,000 with a private
lender. The loan had a 90-day maturity; bore interest at 18.0% per
annum with principal and interest due upon maturity; and was secured by all
existing and after acquired assets of Gulf Western. The loan
provided for 100,000 shares of common stock (“Bonus Shares”) to be issued to the
lender in the event that Wharton completed a public transaction. The loan
agreement provided for Gulf Western to use its best efforts to register the
Bonus Shares issuable under the loan agreement within a 12-month period from the
date of their issuance. During the second fiscal quarter ending
February 28, 2007, the triggering event occurred to issue the Bonus Shares, and
Gulf Western recorded a non-cash charge of $100,000 to interest expense for the
fair value of the 100,000 Bonus Shares committed to the
lender. The loan was fully repaid to the lender during
the year ending August 31, 2007, and the 100,000 Bonus Shares were issued to the
lender on May 21, 2007.
Convertible Unsecured
Debentures
On March 13, 2006 Wharton Resources
Limited (“Wharton Limited”), a corporation organized in New Brunswick, Canada,
issued three unsecured convertible debentures denominated in Canadian dollars
with total principal balance of CAD$85,000 (US$76,883 at August 31,
2006). In the event that Wharton Limited common shares began trading
on a public market, the debentures provided that they would be automatically
converted into common shares at a conversion rate of 85% of the initial publicly
traded share price. If not converted by the maturity date, the
outstanding principal balance together with interest accrued since the debenture
issuances would be due and payable to the debenture holders.
Wharton Limited was the original sole stockholder of Wharton
Corp. and as of August 30, 2006, Wharton Corp. assumed the obligations for the
convertible debentures of Wharton Limited. Pursuant
to the merger agreement between Wharton Corp. and Gulf Western on January 3,
2007, the date the merger was consummated, Gulf Western assumed the obligation
to issue common shares to the three debenture holders and issued a total of
108,109 shares of common stock to them for the then outstanding principal and
interest amounts under the debentures. The debentures
also provided that warrants to purchase common shares would be issued to the
debenture holders, and in conjunction with the merger Gulf Western issued to the
three debenture holders warrants to purchase 85,000 shares of common stock of
Gulf Western at an exercise price of $1.25 per share, with a twelve month
expiry.
The fair value of the warrants attached to the convertible
debentures totaling $75,390 was derived through use of the Black-Scholes option
pricing model. The parameters used in the model were : a
risk-free interest rate of 4.98%; the current stock price at date of issuance of
$1.00 per share; the exercise price of the warrants of $1.25; the expected term
of one year; expected volatility of 183%; and dividend yield of
0%. The estimated fair value of the warrants was recorded as a debt
discount with a corresponding increase to additional paid-in capital of
$75,390. Upon the conversion of the debentures into common
shares on January 3, 2007, the debt discount of $75,390 was charged to interest
expense.
NOTE 8 – INTEREST
EXPENSE
The following table is a detail of the
components of interest expense for the years ended August 31, 2007 and
2006:
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Interest expense on convertible
debentures
|
|
$
|
24,726
|
|
|
$
|
4,765
|
|
Interest expense on note
payable
|
|
|
5,342
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Interest expense on convertible
note – related party
|
|
|
116,712
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Interest expense on convertible
note
|
|
|
9,698
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Bonus shares on notes
payable
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Amortization of debt
discount
|
|
|
99,813
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing
cost
|
|
|
7,015
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest
expense
|
|
$
|
663,306
|
|
|
$
|
4,765
|
|
There was no interest expense for the
period from inception (January 20, 2005) to August 31, 2005.
Gulf Western incurred $389,095 of costs
associated with financing activities for the period from inception through
August 31, 2007 for transactions that were not consummated and, accordingly,
have been charged to expense in the consolidated statements of
operations.
NOTE 9 – STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
Gulf Western has authorized 1.2 billion
shares of $0.001 par value share of common voting stock. At
August 31, 2007 and 2006, Gulf Western had issued and outstanding shares of
common stock of 53,489,662 and 25,000,000, respectively.
Issuance of Common Shares and Warrants
In Private Placement Offerings
During the year ended August 31, 2007,
Gulf Western sold units in private placement offerings. Each unit
consisted of one share of common stock, one Class A Warrant and one Class B
Warrant. Each Class A Warrant is exercisable at a price of $2.00 per
common share for a period of three years. Each Class B Warrant is
exercisable at a price of $3.00 per common share for a period of three
years. The Class A and Class B Warrants’ relative fair values on the
date cash was received from the investor was estimated through use of the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. The parameters used in the
calculation of the Black-Scholes fair values for the Warrants are provided in
the following table:
Issue Date
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
Risk-Free Interest
Rate
|
|
|
Common Share
Price
|
|
|
Term
(years)
|
|
January 22,
2007
|
|
|
120
|
%
|
|
|
4.85
|
%
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
May 10,
2007
|
|
|
115
|
%
|
|
|
4.66% - 4.79
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.68 -
$0.88
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
August 16,
2007
|
|
|
108
|
%
|
|
|
4.57% - 4.92
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.45 -
$0.68
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
August 31,
2007
|
|
|
108
|
%
|
|
|
4.66% - 4.79
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.22 -
$0.80
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Summarized in the following table are
Gulf Western’s sales of units during the year ended August 31, 2007 and the
associated estimated relative fair values of the shares of common stock and the
Class A and Class B warrants that comprised the units sold:
Date
|
|
Number of
Units
|
|
|
Price per
Unit
|
|
|
Total
Proceeds
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Class A
Warrant
|
|
|
Class B
Warrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 22,
2007
|
|
|
3,205,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
$
|
3,205,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,487,834
|
|
|
$
|
910,336
|
|
|
$
|
806,831
|
|
May 10,
2007
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
257,224
|
|
|
|
143,323
|
|
|
|
124,253
|
|
August 16,
2007
|
|
|
1,712,500
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
685,000
|
|
|
|
369,960
|
|
|
|
171,819
|
|
|
|
143,221
|
|
August 31,
2007
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
|
$
|
240,877
|
|
|
$
|
87,902
|
|
|
$
|
71,221
|
|
Common Shares Issued to Acquire Oil and
Gas Properties
On January 30, 2007, Gulf Western
purchased Orbit’s interest in the Mound Branch Project for $6.8 million, which
included consideration of 4,039,053 shares of common stock with a fair value of
$1.00 per share or $4,039,053 in total.
On October 16, 2006, 5,000,000 shares of
common stock of Gulf Western were issued to CodeAmerica in exchange for its
Oakcrest Prospect oil and gas interests located in
Wharton County
,
Texas
.
Consummation of Reverse
Merger
On January 3, 2007 the reverse merger
between Georgia Exploration Inc. and Wharton Corp. was
consummated. As a result of the reverse merger, each share of
common stock held by the Wharton Corp. shareholders was exchanged into 25,000
common shares in Gulf Western with a total aggregate share issuance of
30,000,000 shares of common stock to the former Wharton Corp.
shareholders.
Of the 27,645,000 shares of Gulf Western outstanding at the
time of the merger, a total of 15,645,000 outstanding shares of Gulf Western
common stock were purchased and cancelled.
Immediately following the closing of the
merger transaction, Gulf Western had 42,000,000 shares of common stock issued
and outstanding with former Wharton Corp. shareholders holding 71.43% of the
total issued and outstanding shares of common stock.
Unsecured Debenture
Conversion
On January 3, 2007, the provisions of
the Wharton Corp. debentures resulted in the automatic conversion of the
debentures into common stock of Gulf Western. The then
outstanding principal and interest due to the three debenture holders was
converted into 108,109 common shares. Additionally, Gulf Western issued 85,000
warrants for shares of common stock to the debenture holders with an exercise
price of $1.25 and a 12-month term.
Shares Issued for
Services
During the year ended August 31, 2007,
Gulf Western issued 600,000 common shares to consultants for their services to
Gulf Western. The shares issued for services were valued at $390,500,
which was determined based on the share price on the date that Gulf Western
became obligated to issue the shares to the consultants.
Bonus Shares on Notes
Payable
During the year ended August 31, 2007,
Gulf Western issued 300,000 shares of common stock at $1.00 per share for
additional consideration to various lenders under the terms of notes payable
(“Bonus Shares”). At August 31, 2007, 100,000 shares of unissued
common stock is recorded as stock payable.
NOTE 10 – WARRANTS
As of August 31, 2006, there were no
warrants outstanding.
Warrants outstanding and exercisable as
of August 31, 2007, are summarized below:
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Remaining
|
|
|
Number of
Warrants
|
|
Description
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Life
(years)
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Series A – Convertible unsecured
debentures
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
Class A Warrants issued in private
placements
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
|
|
|
5,442,500
|
|
|
|
5,442,500
|
|
Class B Warrants issued in private
placements
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
|
|
|
5,442,500
|
|
|
|
5,442,500
|
|
Convertible Secured
Note
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
2.84
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
Short Term
Note
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
2.83
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Placement agent
warrants
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,395,000
|
|
|
|
11,395,000
|
|
No warrants were exercised, cancelled or
expired during the year ended August 31, 2007. The intrinsic value of
warrants outstanding as of August 31, 2007 was zero.
NOTE 11 – STOCK OPTION
PLAN
On March 9, 2007 Gulf Western adopted
the 2007 Non Qualified Stock Option Plan (“2007 Option Plan”) for its directors,
officers, employees and consultants, which reserved 9,000,000 shares of common
stock for issuance under the plan. On May 10, 2007, Gulf Western
granted stock options under the plan to officers, directors and an advisor for
common shares totaling 3,000,000 at an exercise price of $0.79 per
share. The 3,000,000 options vest quarterly over twelve-months with
the first quarter vesting on the date of grant. The fair value
for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model assuming an expected life of 2.0 years, a risk-free rate of
4.70%, a share price volatility of 115.33%, share price of $0.79, and dividend
yield of 0.0%. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model resulted in a
fair value on the date the options were granted of
$1,432,321.
On June 14, 2007 Gulf Western granted
options under the 2007 Option Plan to non-management directors and consultants
of Gulf Western for common shares totaling 625,000 at an exercise price of $0.50
per share. The 625,000 options vest in four equal installments over
twenty months with the first vesting on August 15, 2007 and the final vesting on
February 15, 2009.. The fair value of the options granted was
estimated to be $149,593 under the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, assuming
an expected life of 2.0 years, a risk-free rate of 5.1%, a share price
volatility of 115.33%, share price of $0.42, and dividend yield of
0.0%. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model resulted in a total fair
value on the date the options were granted of $0.24 per share
option.
For the year ended August 31, 2007, Gulf Western recorded stock
option expense reflecting the non-cash fair value amortization of
$738,599. A summary of Gulf Western’s stock option activity for the
year ended August 31, 2007 is as follows:
|
|
Number of
Options
|
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise
Price
|
|
Balance, August 31,
2006
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Options
granted
|
|
|
3,625,000
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
Cancelled/forfeited
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance, August 31,
2007
|
|
|
3,625,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
Vested at August 31,
2007
|
|
|
1,656,250
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
Unvested at August 31,
2007
|
|
|
1,968,750
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
The weighted average remaining life of
outstanding stock options at August 31, 2007 was 9.75 years.
At August 31, 2007, there is $843,315 of
total unrecognized compensation cost related to fair value of the unvested
share-based compensation granted under the 2007 Stock Option Plan that will be
amortized over the remaining vesting period. The
intrinsic value of the options outstanding as of August 31, 2007 is
zero.
NOTE 12 - SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
Issuance of Common Shares and Warrants
in Private Placements
On September 20, 2007, Gulf Western
completed a private placement transaction for 1,250,000 units at a price of
$0.40 for aggregate proceeds of $500,000. Each unit consisted of one
common share, one Class C Warrant and one Class D Warrant. Each Class
C Warrant may be exercised at a price of $0.65 for a period of 3 years to
acquire one additional share of common stock of Gulf
Western. Each Class D Warrant may be exercised at a price of
$2.00 for a period of three years to acquire one additional share of common
stock.
The relative fair value of the common
shares and the Class C and Class D Warrants for the private placement
transactions closed on September 20, 2007, was as follows:
|
|
September 20, 2007
Placement
|
|
Common Shares (1,250,000
shares)
|
|
$
|
265,918
|
|
Class C Warrants (1,250,000
shares)
|
|
|
145,384
|
|
Class D Warrants (1,250,000
shares)
|
|
|
88,698
|
|
Total
placement
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
The relative fair value of the Class C and Class D Warrants
issued in connection with the units sold were estimated using the Black-Scholes
valuation model. The parameters used in the Black-Scholes
valuation model were: a risk-free interest rate of 4.19%; the current stock
price on the date of issuance of $0.33 per common share; the exercise price of
the warrants of $0.65 and $2.00 per share, respectively; expected terms of three
years; volatility of 108%; and a dividend yield of 0.0%.
Senior Secured Convertible Notes
Payable
On September 10, 2007, Gulf Western entered into a Security
Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) with two lenders under which Gulf Western
borrowed a total of $3,700,000 under Senior Secured Convertible Notes (the
“Convertible Notes”) with Metage Funds Limited (“Metage”) and NCIM Limited
(“NCIM”). Gulf Western borrowed $3,200,000 from Metage and $500,000 from
NCIM. Pursuant to the SPA, Gulf Western issued 1,500,000 common
shares and issued 3,461,538 warrants to purchase shares of common stock in Gulf
Western at an exercise price of $0.26 per share for a period of five years. The
Convertible Notes and related interest are convertible into common shares of
Gulf Western at a price of $0.39 per common share at or before maturity. The
Convertible Notes bear interest at 15% per annum, and mature on September 10,
2008. Interest for the first six months is due on March 10, 2008 and is payable
monthly thereafter; with the total principal balance due at maturity. The total
$3,700,000 Convertible Notes may be prepaid at any time after the six month
anniversary of the Convertible Notes with a 2.5% prepayment penalty. Gulf
Western received net proceeds of $2,944,000 (after $256,000 of placement fees)
and the exchange of the $500,000 NCIM Convertible Secured Note issued on July 3,
2007 for $500,000 of the Convertible Notes.
In conjunction with the SPA, Gulf Western entered into a
registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with the
lenders pursuant to which Gulf Western was required to: (i) file a registration
statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the common
stock issued under the SPA and the common stock issuable upon exercise of the
Warrants and conversion of the Convertible Notes within 60 days after September
12, 2007; and to: (ii) cause such registration statement to be declared
effective under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules
promulgated there under, not later than 150 days after September 12,
2007. If such registration statement is not filed by the 60th day
after September 12, 2007, (November 12, 2007), or the registration statement is
not declared effective on or prior to the 150th day after September 12, 2007,
liquidated damages in the form of registration rights penalties, calculated
based on a prescribed formula in the SPA, in the maximum amount of $150,000 will
be due to the lenders. Gulf Western evaluated the terms and the
filing and effectiveness time requirements provided for in the Registration
Rights Agreement and determined that the incurrence of the registration rights
penalties was probable and that the financial obligation could be estimated at
the time the SPA, Registration Rights Agreement and other transaction documents
were executed. Gulf Western estimates that the maximum registration rights
penalties of $150,000 is probable, and the registration rights penalties were
accounted for in accordance with FASB Staff Position No. EITF 00-19-2 whereby
the contingent liability of $150,000 was accrued as a current liability in the
consolidated balance sheet in September 2007 and included in the allocation of
the proceeds from the financing transaction. This resulted in an increase to the
debt discount on the issuance of the Convertible Notes by $150,000 which will be
amortized using the effective interest method over the twelve month term of the
Convertible Notes.
Gulf Western evaluated the terms of the Convertible Notes, the
issuance of common stock and attached warrants in accordance with EITF 98-5 and
EITF 00-27, and concluded that the intrinsic value of the conversion feature of
the Convertible Notes represented a beneficial conversion feature in the amount
of $426,137. The relative fair value of the warrants and common
shares issued were $646,791 and $326,782, respectively as derived through the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. The total discount of $1,399,710
associated with the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature, and
the relative fair value of the warrants and stock is being amortized to interest
expense using the effective interest method over the twelve month term of the
Convertible Notes. The total debt discount, including the registration rights
penalties, on the issuance of the Convertible Notes was $1,549,710.
The principal assumptions used in the Black-Scholes valuation
model to determine the intrinsic value of the conversion feature of the
Convertible Notes and the relative fair value of the warrants and common shares
issued were: a risk-free interest rate of 4.0%; the current stock price on the
date of issuance of $0.32 per common share; the exercise price of the warrants
of $0.26 per share; expected warrant term of five years; conversion price of
$0.39 per common share, volatility of 121.16%; and a dividend yield of 0.0%.
The Convertible Notes are secured by a
lien on substantially all of the assets of the Gulf Western, including all of
the equity interests of the Gulf Western’s subsidiaries and the Gulf Western’s
rights in certain real property, pursuant to the terms of a Security Agreement
and Pledge Agreement entered into in connection with the closing of transactions
under the SPA. In addition, Gulf Western Petroleum, LP, Wharton
Resources Corp. and Wharton Resources LLC, each a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Gulf Western, entered into a Guaranty with the Buyers, whereby each
of the subsidiaries guaranteed the payment and performance of all obligations of
Gulf Western under the Convertible Notes and terms of the SPA. Gulf Western
Petroleum, LP also entered into a Mortgage, Deed of Trust, Assignment of
Production, Security Agreement, Fixture Filing and Financing Statement with
respect to certain properties in
Texas
and
Kansas
to secure the obligations of Gulf
Western under the SPA and the Convertible Notes.
In conjunction with the Convertible Notes, Gulf Western issued
300,000 shares of common stock to a placement agent valued at $96,000 ($0.32 per
share) and cash fees totaling $256,000. A total of $352,000 was recorded as
deferred financing costs, and are being amortized using the effective interest
method over the one year life of the debt. If the Convertible Notes
are converted or repaid prior to the maturity date, any unamortized cost at the
time of conversion or repayment will be immediately recognized and charged to
net income.
Mound
Branch Project,
Elk
County
,
Kansas
In connection with the Mound Branch acquisition from Orbit, on
January 30, 2008, Gulf Western agreed to extend Orbit’s delivery of the
independent valuation report for three months until April 30, 2008. In
connection with the extension, Orbit agreed to defer the quarterly interest
payment due on the convertible note until April 30, 2008.
NOTE 13 – RESTATEMENT
Gulf Western concluded that it was necessary to revise its
accounting treatment for its acquisition oil and gas interests made from related
parties, to record the acquisitions of the Mound Branch Project; the Baxter
Bledsoe Prospect; and the Bell Prospect at fair market value of the interests
acquired in lieu of recording the acquisitions at the related party seller’s
historical cost in the assets acquired. Gulf Western previously accounted for
the difference between fair value and historical cost as a deemed dividend.
The oil and gas interests were acquired from related parties
that exercise substantive control over Gulf Western, through their direct and
indirect common share holdings and their director and senior officer positions
with Gulf Western. EITF 02-5 provides that a 50% threshold of the
voting ownership interest in related party entities is required in order for
entities of related parties to be deemed to be under common
control. In the absence of meeting the 50% threshold of
control, EITF 02-5 provides that the interests acquired be recorded by the
acquirer at fair market value.
Accordingly, Gulf Western increased its oil and gas investments
by $3,817,432 at August 31, 2007 and revised its previously recorded deemed
dividend.
As a result of the restatement, “Net
loss per share –
basic and diluted” decreased from
($0.18) per share to ($0.08) per share, a decrease in the net loss of $0.10 per
share.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS
PRODUCING ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)
The following supplemental
unaudited information regarding Gulf Western’s oil and gas activities is
presented pursuant to the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 69. The
standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed by applying
fiscal year-end prices of oil and gas to the estimated future production of
proved oil and gas reserves, less estimated future expenditures (based on fiscal
year-end cost estimates assuming continuation of existing economic
conditions
) to be incurred in
developing and producing the proved reserves, less estimated future income tax
expenses (based on fiscal year-end statutory tax rates) to be incurred on
pre-tax net cash flows less tax basis of the properties and available credits,
and assuming continuation of existing economic conditions. The
estimated future net cash flows are then discounted using a rate of 10 percent
per year to reflect the estimated timing of the future cash
flows.
Capitalized Costs Relating to Oil and
Gas Producing Activities as of August 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Proved properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mineral interests
|
|
$
|
966,001
|
|
|
$
|
773,016
|
|
Wells, equipment and
facilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total proved properties
|
|
|
966,001
|
|
|
|
773,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unproved properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mineral interests
|
|
$
|
5,935,707
|
|
|
$
|
136,987
|
|
Uncompleted wells, equipment
and facilities
|
|
|
4,831,487
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total unproved properties
|
|
|
10,767,194
|
|
|
|
136,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: accumulated
depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net capitalized costs
|
|
$
|
11,733,195
|
|
|
$
|
910,003
|
|
Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Producing
Activities for the Years Ended August 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Acquisition of proved
properties
|
|
$
|
192,985
|
|
|
$
|
773,016
|
|
Acquisition of unproved
properties
|
|
|
5,798,720
|
|
|
|
136,987
|
|
Development costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exploration costs
|
|
|
4,831,487
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total costs incurred
|
|
$
|
10,823,192
|
|
|
$
|
910,003
|
|
Results of Operations for Oil and Gas
Producing Activities for the Years Ended August 31, 2007 and
2006:
Gulf Western generated no revenues and
incurred no expenses related to oil and gas producing activities for the years
ended August 31, 2007 and 2006.
Proved Reserves:
Gulf Western’s proved oil and natural
gas reserves have been estimated by independent petroleum engineers. Proved
reserves are the estimated quantities that geologic and engineering data
demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from
known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved
developed reserves are the quantities expected to be recovered through existing
wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Due to the inherent
uncertainties and the limited nature of reservoir data, such estimates are
subject to change as additional information becomes available. The reserves
actually recovered and the timing of production of these reserves may be
substantially different from the original estimate. Revisions result primarily
from new information obtained from development drilling and production history;
acquisitions of oil and natural gas properties; and changes in economic factors.
Proved reserves as of August 31, 2007 and 2006 are summarized in the table
below:
Proved Developed and Undeveloped Natural
Gas and Oil Reserves at August 31, 2007 and 2006 (Mcfe):
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Proved undeveloped reserves -
beginning of period
|
|
|
4,220,394
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Petroleum and natural gas lease
acreage acquired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,220,394
|
|
Extensions, discoveries and
improved recovery
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Production
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Revisions of previous
estimates
|
|
|
(272,611
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proved undeveloped reserves - end
of period
|
|
|
3,947,783
|
|
|
|
4,220,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved developed reserves - end of
period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Standardized Measure of Discounted
Future Net Cash Flows at August 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Future cash
inflows
|
|
$
|
28,609,680
|
|
|
$
|
29,959,342
|
|
Future production
costs
|
|
|
(3,255,451
|
)
|
|
|
(4,104,540
|
)
|
Future development
costs
|
|
|
(8,692,702
|
)
|
|
|
(6,730,459
|
)
|
Future income
taxes
|
|
|
(2,604,004
|
)
|
|
|
(3,926,340
|
)
|
Future net cash
flows
|
|
|
14,057,523
|
|
|
|
15,198,003
|
|
10% annual discount for estimated
timing of cash flows
|
|
|
(2,889,053
|
)
|
|
|
(3,778,299
|
)
|
Standardized measure of discounted
future net cash flows:
|
|
$
|
11,168,470
|
|
|
$
|
11,419,704
|
|
Changes in Standardized Measure of
Discounted Future Net Cash Flows for the Years Ended August 31, 2007 and
2006:
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Beginning of
period
|
|
$
|
11,419,704
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Petroleum and natural gas lease
acreage acquired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,419,704
|
|
Revisions of quantity
estimates
|
|
|
(570,380
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Changes in prices and production
costs
|
|
|
705,169
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Changes in estimated future
development costs
|
|
|
(1,762,243
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net change in income
taxes
|
|
|
881,394
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Timing and
other
|
|
|
494,826
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of
period
|
|
$
|
11,168,470
|
|
|
$
|
11,419,704
|
|
Item
8
.
|
Changes in and Disagreements with
Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosures
|
On January 18, 2007, our independent
auditor, Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton Labonte LLP (“DMCL”) was dismissed. DMCL
conducted the audit of our March 31, 2006 balance sheet, and the statements of
operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the period from February 21,
2006 (date of inception) through March 31, 2006. In DMCL’s report dated April
25, 2006, there were no adverse opinions or disclaimers of the opinion, or
qualification or modification as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting
principles, with the exception of a statement regarding the uncertainty of our
ability to continue as a going concern.
During the period from our inception
through March 31, 2006 and the subsequent interim period through the dismissal
date, there were no disagreements with DMCL on any matter of accounting
principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or
procedures, which if not resolved to DMCL’s satisfaction would have caused DMCL
to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with
DMCL’s report.
On January 18, 2007, our Board approved
the engagement of Malone & Bailey, PC (“M&B”) of
Houston
,
Texas
as our principal accountant. Neither we
nor anyone on our behalf consulted with M&B regarding either the application
of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or
proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial
statements, nor has M&B provided us with a written report or oral advice
that was an important factor considered by us in reaching a decision as to any
accounting, auditing, or factual reporting issue, or any matter that was the
subject of a disagreement or reportable events with M&B.
On October 5, 2007, the Board dismissed
M&B as the Company’s independent registered public accounting
firm. M&B’s reports on our financial statements for the two
fiscal years ended August 31, 2006 and 2005, did not contain an adverse opinion
or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty,
audit scope or accounting principles, except for concerns about our ability to
continue as a going concern. During our two most recent fiscal years
ended August 31, 2006 and 2005, and through October 5, 2007, there were no
disagreements between us and M&B on any manner of accounting principles or
practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which
disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of M&B, would have caused
it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection
with its report on our financial statements for such years. There
were no reportable events that occurred within the two most recent fiscal years
ended August 31, 2006 and 2005, or within the interim period through October 5,
2007.
On October 5, 2007, the Board approved
the engagement of GBH CPAs, PC (“GBH”) as our new independent registered public
accounting firm. Neither we nor anyone on our behalf consulted with
GBH regarding either the application of accounting principles to a specified
transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that
might be rendered on our financial statements, nor has GBH provided us with a
written report or oral advice that was an important factor considered by us in
reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing, or factual reporting issue,
or any matter that was the subject of a disagreement or reportable events with
GBH.
Item 8A
.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
This
annual report does not include a report of management’s assessment regarding
internal control over financial reporting due to a transition period established
by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the
end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s management, including
its Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer, carried out
an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and
procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive
Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer concluded the following:
|
(i)
|
that
the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures
are
designed to ensure (a) that information required to be disclosed by the
Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods
specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (b) that such information is
accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate
,
to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure; and
|
|
(ii)
|
that
the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are
effective.
|
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting during the year ended August 31, 2007 that have materially
affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting.
Item
8B.
|
Other
Information
|
Not applicable.
PART
III
Item
9.
|
Directors and Executive Officers,
Promoters, Control Persons and Corporate Governance; Compliance with
Section 16(a) of the Exchange
Act
|
The
following table sets forth information concerning our directors, executive
officers and key employees
as of
November 28, 2007:
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
|
|
|
Wm. Milton Cox
|
60
|
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
|
Bassam “
Sam”
Nastat
|
39
|
President and Director
|
Donald L. Sytsma
|
50
|
Chief Financial Offi
cer, Corporate Secretary,
Treasurer and Director
|
T. Arden McCracken
|
63
|
Director
|
J. Timothy Altum
|
52
|
Director
|
Wm. Milton
Cox
. Mr. Cox has served as our Chairman and CEO since December
of 2006 and as a director since January of 2007. Since 1982, Mr. Cox
has been the President and CEO of CodeAmerica Investments, LLC (“CodeAmerica”),
which has various interests in mining and oil & natural gas
production. Since January of 2007, Mr. Cox has devoted substantially
all of his professional time to the Company. Mr. Cox has 25 years of
experience in resource investment management as well as international business
experience in oil, natural gas and mining. From October of 2003 to
February of 2006, Mr. Cox served as Chairman of Altus Explorations, Inc., an oil
and natural gas company quoted on the OTCBB (“Altus”), and was its President and
Chief Executive Officer from October of 2003 through June of
2005. Mr. Cox has a Bachelor of Business Administration in Marketing
from Memphis State University and Masters in Business Administration in Finance
from the University of Mississippi.
Bassam “Sam”
Nastat
. Mr. Nastat has served as our President since December
of 2006 and as a director since January of 2007. Since May 1994, Mr.
Nastat has been the Vice President of Project Development and Finance for
CodeAmerica, developing financing strategies to take advantage of exploration
opportunities in Texas, Wyoming and Alaska. Since January of 2007,
Mr. Nastat has devoted substantially all of his professional time to the
Company. From November of 2003 to February of 2006 Mr. Nastat was a
director of Altus and served as President of Altus from June of 2005 to February
of 2006. Mr. Nastat attended McMaster University, Hamilton,
Ontario and the University of Tulsa, earning a certificate in Basic Petroleum
Geology.
Donald L.
Sytsma.
Mr. Sytsma has served as our Chief Financial Officer,
Corporate Secretary and Treasurer since December of 2006 and as a director since
January of 2007. Since April of 2003, Mr. Sytsma has been an officer
and a director of DLS Energy Associates, LLC, an independent consulting company
and has worked in various capacities with them since 1995. Since January of
2007, Mr. Sytsma has devoted all of his professional time to the
Company. From November of 2003 to June of 2005 Mr. Sytsma was Chief
Financial Officer of Altus. From November 2003 through February 2006
Mr. Sytsma was a director of Altus. Mr. Sytsma is a former Executive
Committee member of the North American Energy Standards Board, and has chaired
multiple industry subcommittees developing standards for the U.S. energy
markets. Mr. Sytsma holds a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from Indiana
University.
T. Arden
McCracken
. Mr.
McCracken has served as a director since March 12, 2007. From 1996 to
the present, he has work as a senior engineering advisor to Pennzoil Exploration
and Devon Energy. He is responsible for evaluations and
recommendations on all international ventures and for assisting in the
preparation of the year end reserve report. Mr. McCracken holds a
Ph.D., M.S. and B.S. in Chemical Engineering from
Clemson
University
.
J. Timothy
Altum
. Mr.
Altum has served as a director since March 22, 2007. From 1998 to the
present, he has worked as a geological adviser to PennzEnergy, Devon Energy Corp
/ BP with respect to their Eugene Island 330 Field, which is PennzEnergy’s
largest single asset. His responsibilities include integration of geology,
petrophysics, geophysics and engineering data into 3-D reservoir
models. Mr. Altum has a Bachelor of Science in Geology/Physics from
Hardin
Simmons
University
and Master of Science in Geology
from
Baylor
University
.
There are no family relationships among
our directors and executive officers. No director, executive officer
or promoter has been a director or executive officer of any business which has
filed a bankruptcy petition or had a bankruptcy petition filed against it during
the past five years. No director, executive officer or promoter has been
convicted of a criminal offense or is the subject of a pending criminal
proceeding during the past five years. No director, executive officer or
promoter has been the subject of any order, judgment or decree of any court
permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting
his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities during
the past five years. No director, executive officer or promoter has been found
by a court to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law
during the past five years.
None of our directors or executive
officers or their respective immediate family members or affiliates is indebted
to us.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance
Section
16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors
and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of our equity
securities, to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in
ownership of our common stock with the SEC and to furnish us a copy of each
filed report.
Each of
Sokhie Puar, a former director and officer, and Bijay Singh a former director,
failed to timely file their initial insider Form 3 reports which were due upon
their becoming insiders in connection with our merger with
Wharton.
Code
of Ethics
Our Board
of Directors (the “Board”) has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Compliance Program and an Insider Trading Policy providing guidelines with
respect to transactions in Company securities and is applicable to all
directors, officers, employees and consultants who receive or have accesses to
material non-public Company information. All participants in
the Plan are required to acknowledge receipt of the Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics Compliance Program and the Insider Trading Policy to participate in the
Plan, and they are required upon request by us to periodically confirm their
adherence and compliance to these policies as a condition of their continued
participation in the Plan.
Corporate
Governance
The Board
does not have an executive committee or any committee performing a similar
function. The Board is in the process of forming an audit committee,
of which a majority of the members will be comprised of independent
directors. There have been no material changes to the procedures by
which our stockholders may recommend nominees to the board of
directors.
Item
10.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
Summary Compensation
Table
. The
following table provides information concerning compensation paid or accrued
during the fiscal years ended August 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 to our
principal executive officer and each of our other two most highly paid executive
officers whose salary and bonus exceeded $100,000, collectively referred to as
the Named Executive Officers, determined at the end of the last fiscal
year:
Name and Principal
Position
|
|
Fiscal
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Option Awards
(1)
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Wm. Milton
Cox,
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
238,721
|
|
|
$
|
140,000
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
378,821
|
|
Chairman and
Chief
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
Officer
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam “Sam”
Nastat,
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
477,441
|
|
|
$
|
140,000
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
617,441
|
|
President
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald L. Sytsma,
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
238,721
|
|
|
$
|
120,000
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
358,721
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
Secretary
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
and
Treasurer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
Estimated fair value of options on the
date of grant computed with the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Amount
identified is the non-cash fair value amortization of options granted that
became vested by the recipient during the period then ending. No
options have been exercised by the recipients. See “Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End” for the material terms of each
grant.
(2)
Fees for services remitted to
CodeAmerica Investments, LLC, for which Mr. Cox serves as the Managing
Member.
(3)
Fees for services remitted to Paragon
Capital, LLC, for which Mr. Nastat serves as the Manager.
(4)
Fees for services remitted to DLS
Energy Associates, LLC and H&H Energy Consultants, an affiliate of DLS
Energy Associates, LLC, for which Mr. Sytsma is the Managing
Member.
Employment
Agreements
We have not entered into employment
agreements with any of our executive officers.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or
Change of Control
There are no payments due to any of our
executive officers in connection with a termination or on a change of
control.
OUTSTANDING
EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
August
31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Option
Awards
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
|
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
|
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
|
Number
of
Shares
or
Units
of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
|
|
|
Market
Value
of
Shares
or
Units
of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or
Other
Rights
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards
Market
or
Payout
Value
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or
Other
Rights
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
(f)
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
|
(j)
|
|
Wm.
Milton Cox
|
|
(1)
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
5/10/2017
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Bassam
“Sam” Nastat
|
|
(2)
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
5/10/2017
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Donald
L. Sytsma
|
|
(1)
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
5/10/2017
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
____________________
|
(1)
|
Mr. Cox and Mr. Sytsma received
options to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock on May 10, 2007 with an
exercise price of $0.79 per share. The options vest quarterly
over the twelve months following the date of issuance and expire on May
10, 2017.
|
|
(2)
|
Mr. Nastat received options to
purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock on May 10, 2007 with an exercise
price of $0.79 per share, which vests over twelve months and expires on
May 10, 2017.
|
Our directors are not compensated in
cash for their services but are reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred
in furtherance of our business. The following table sets forth
information with respect to compensation paid to directors during the fiscal
year ended August 31, 2007
, which also represents all compensation paid
to such directors since they began their service as our directors
.
Name
|
|
Fees Earned or Paid in
Cash
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive
Compensation
|
|
|
Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation Earnings
|
|
|
All Other Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
T. Arden McCracken
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
143,296
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
143,296
|
|
J. Timothy Altum
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
143,296
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
143,296
|
|
____________________
|
(1)
|
Mr. McCracken
received options to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock on May 10,
2007 with an exercise price of $0.79 per share. The options
vest quarterly over the twelve months following the date of issuance and
expire on May 10, 2017. He also received options to purchase
100,000 shares of common stock on June 14, 2007 with an exercise price of
$0.50 per share, which vest over 20 months and expires on June 14, 2017.
The estimated fair value of the options granted was computed with the
Black-Sholes option-pricing model. The amount identified in the
table is the non-cash fair value amortization of options granted that
became vested by the recipient during the fiscal year ended August 31,
2007.
|
|
(2)
|
Mr. Altum
received options to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock on May 10,
2007 with an exercise price of $0.79 per share. The options vest quarterly
over the twelve months following the date of issuance and expire on May
10, 2017. He also received options to purchase 100,000 shares
of common stock on June 14, 2007 with an exercise price of $0.50 per
share, which vest over 20 months and expires on June 14, 2017. The
estimated fair value of the options granted was computed with the
Black-Sholes option-pricing model. The amount identified in the
table is the non-cash fair value amortization of options granted that
became vested by the recipient during the fiscal year ended August 31,
2007.
|
Other Information
From February 21, 2006 to January 3,
2007, we paid a total of $20,527 in consulting fees. Of the total,
Bijay Singh, our former director, received $10,000. Sokhie Puar, one
of our former directors and our former President, Corporate Secretary and
Treasurer, received $10,527.
Item
11.
|
Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
|
The
following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership
of our common stock as of November 28, 2007, by:
|
•
|
each
person who is known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of the
outstanding class of our capital
stock;
|
|
•
|
each
member of the Board;
|
|
•
|
each
of our executive officers; and
|
|
•
|
all
of our directors and executive officers as a
group.
|
Beneficial
ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. To
our knowledge, each of the holders of capital stock listed below has sole voting
and investment power as to the capital stock owned unless otherwise
noted.
Name and Address of
Beneficial Owner
|
|
Numbers of Shares of Common
Stock Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
% of Common Stock
Outstanding
(1)
|
|
Wm. Milton Cox
|
|
|
17,269,527
|
(2)
|
|
|
30.5
|
%
|
Metage Funds Limited
|
|
|
13,166,667
|
(3)
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
Bassam “Sam” Nastat
|
|
|
10,019,526
|
(4)
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
Donald L. Sytsma
|
|
|
7,751,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
T. Arden McCracken
|
|
|
140,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
*
|
|
J. Timothy Altum
|
|
|
140,000
|
(7)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Executive Officers and
Directors as a group (5 persons)
|
|
|
35,320,053
|
|
|
|
60.6
|
%
|
__________________________
* Less than one
percent
|
(1)
|
Based
on 56,603,107 shares outstanding as of November 28,
2007.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes
250,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options which
are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days
hereof. Wm. Milton Cox is the managing member of CodeAmerica
Investments, LLC, the holder of record of 17,019,527 of these shares, and
he is the beneficial owner of these shares. Wm. Milton Cox is
our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. CodeAmerica
Investments LLC’s address is 6300 Germantown Rd., Suite 100, Olive Branch,
MS 38654.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes
11,666,667 shares are issuable upon conversion of outstanding convertible
notes and exercise of outstanding warrants. Metage Capital Limited, Mr.
Tom Sharp, Investment Manager exercises voting and investment authority
over these shares. Metage’s address is 8 Pollen Street, London,
England W1S 1NG.
|
|
(4)
|
Includes
500,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options which
are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days
hereof.
|
|
(5)
|
Includes
250,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options which
are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days
hereof. Donald L. Sytsma is the managing member of Harbour
EnCap, LLC, the holder of record of 7,500,000of these shares,
and he is the beneficial owner of these shares. Donald L.
Sytsma is a director and our Corporate Secretary, Treasurer, and Chief
Financial Officer. Harbour Encap LLC’s address is 514 W.
Jefferson Street, Culver, IN 4651.
|
|
(6)
|
Includes
140,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options which
are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days
hereof.
|
|
(7)
|
Includes
140,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options which
are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days
hereof.
|
Item
12.
|
Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions and Director
Independence
|
We have had the following transactions with our executive
officers and directors, or with their affiliates in which they have direct or
indirect material interests. None of the transactions described below
were on terms less favorable than what could have been obtained from
unaffiliated third parties. Any future transactions with our
affiliates will be on terms no less favorable than what could have been obtained
from unaffiliated third parties and will be approved by a majority of our board
of directors, including a majority of the disinterested directors.
Oakcrest
Prospect, Wharton County, Texas
In
connection with the merger of us and Wharton Corp., we acquired oil and gas
lease interests located in Wharton County, Texas. The Oakcrest oil
and gas lease interests were originally acquired by CodeAmerica. When
Wharton Corp. acquired the Oakcrest oil and gas lease interests from CodeAmerica
on October 16, 2006, Wm. Milton Cox was also the Chairman and CEO of Wharton
Corp. CodeAmerica received 5,000,000 shares of our common stock for
its Oakcrest oil and gas lease interests in the merger.
The
acquisition of the Oakcrest oil and gas lease interests from CodeAmerica has
been recorded on our records at its historical cost basis in the interests which
totaled approximately $460,500. When the Oakcrest lease interests
were acquired by Wharton Corp., our shares of common stock were not publicly
traded. The fair value of the shares issued to CodeAmerica for the
lease interests was equal to its historical cost basis in the lease
interests.
Mound
Branch Project, Elk County, Kansas
On
January 30, 2007, we purchased Orbit’s working and net revenue interests in
approximately 8,800 gross acres located in Elk County, Kansas together with its
interests in drilled wells and associated equipment. The purchase
price totaled $6.8 million, and consideration paid to Orbit was comprised of (a)
$760,947, representing funds advanced by us to Orbit for testing and evaluation
of the existing well bores, reservoir formations and associated lease acreage,
(b) a thirty-six month $2.0 million 10% convertible note with principal due at
maturity, and (c) 4,039,053 shares of our common stock with a fair value of
$1.00 per share at the time of issuance.
The note issued to Orbit bears interest
at 10.0% per annum due quarterly in arrears. Pursuant to the
terms of the note, after the initial twelve months, (a) Orbit has the ability to
convert the outstanding principal and interest balance into shares of common
stock at a conversion price of $1.00 per share and (b) we may prepay all or a
portion of the note without penalty. On July 3, 2007 the note was
amended to provide that interest payable for the first two quarters was deferred
by Orbit until October 30, 2007. At August 31, 2007, the
outstanding principal under the note was $2.0 million and accrued interest
totaled $116,712.
The 4,039,053 shares of common stock issued to Orbit as part of
the purchase price were placed in escrow to be released upon Orbit’s delivery to
the escrow agent of an independent report assessing the fair value of the
purchased assets at no less than the purchase price of $6.8
million. Should the valuation be less than the $6.8 million purchase
price, then the number of shares to be released from escrow will be ratably
reduced for the lower valuation. The shares remaining in escrow at
the end of the twelve month period ending January 30, 2008 are to be cancelled
and returned to treasury. To date, no shares have been released
from escrow.
Orbit is
100% owned by CodeAmerica and Paragon, which as noted elsewhere in this Form
10-KSB, are controlled by Wm. Milton Cox and Bassam Nastat, who are senior
officers and directors of Gulf Western.
Immediately
prior to the acquisition of Mound Branch from Orbit on January 30, 2007, Messrs.
Cox and Nastat held a combined 22,500,000 shares of common stock, or 49.7% of
the then issued and outstanding common shares of Gulf Western. The
common shares issued to Orbit in the transaction increased Messrs. Cox’s and
Nastat’s combined direct and indirect holdings in Gulf Western to 53.8% of our
then issued and outstanding shares of common stock.
At the time of the acquisition, Messrs. Cox and Nastat through
their 49.7% direct and indirect common share holdings and their director and
senior officer positions with Gulf Western collectively exercised substantive
over Gulf Western and 100% control over Orbit. The Mound Branch
Project acquisition was accounted for at fair value of $6.8 million in
accordance with the EITF 02-5. The seller’s historical cost in
the Mound Branch assets we acquired totaled approximately $3.2 million.
Orbit
serves as operator of the Mound Branch Project. In conjunction
with the terms of the Mound Branch Project purchase and sale agreement, we have
been funding 100% of the costs incurred by Orbit for the testing and evaluation
of the existing well bores, reservoir formations and associated lease
acreage. The share of costs not attributable to our working interest
ownership in the property is recorded as a receivable from joint interest
partners in the amount of $198,006. We expect to collect this amount
from our partners in the Mound Branch Project.
In addition to the $760,747 paid by us and applied as
consideration against the purchase price from Orbit, Orbit has billed us
$636,684 associated with the testing and evaluation of the Mound Branch Project
since the acquisition. A balance of $248,171 is recorded as payable
to a related party as of August 31, 2007. In the aggregate, through
August 31, 2007, we have incurred costs totaling $1,397,631 on the testing and
evaluation of the Mound Branch Project, of which $1,149,460 has been paid to
Orbit. The testing and evaluation procedures for the Mound
Branch Project were substantially completed in early October 2007.
Baxter Bledsoe Prospect,
Clay
County
,
Kentucky
On February 1, 2006, we purchased the
Baxter Bledsoe Prospect oil and gas lease acreage from CodeAmerica for a cash
purchase price of $330,000. The prospect has approximately 2,200 acres located
in Clay County, Kentucky.
This acquisition from CodeAmerica was
accounted for at fair value with the cash purchase price recorded as lease
acquisition costs as provided for in EITF 02-5. The seller’s
historical cost basis of the lease interests acquired totaled approximately
$170,000.
Bell
Prospect,
Bell County
,
Kentucky
On October 1, 2006, we purchased
CodeAmerica’s oil and gas lease interests located in
Bell County
,
Kentucky
. The cash purchase price was $314,475,
which included $59,475 for land, legal and title services expended by
CodeAmerica on the prospect.
This acquisition from CodeAmerica was
accounted for at fair value with the cash purchase price recorded as lease
acquisition costs as provided for in EITF 02-5. The seller’s
historical cost basis of the lease interests acquired totaled
approximately
$229,475.
Advances from
Stockholder
During the months of April and May 2007,
CodeAmerica made cash advances to us totaling $120,000 for general working
capital requirements. The advances were due on demand, did not bear
interest and were outstanding as of August 31, 2007. The advances
were fully repaid during November 2007.
Office Rent
We share office space in
Houston
,
Texas
with Orbit under a month-to-month
arrangement. The office space is leased by
Orbit. During the years ended August 31, 2007 and 2006, we paid rent
totaling $42,994 and $38,210, respectively.
Director
Independence
Our Board has five members. The Board does not have
an executive committee or any committees performing a similar
function. We are not currently listed on a national securities
exchange or in an inter-dealer quotation system that has requirements that a
majority of the Board be independent. The Board has determined that
T. Arden McCracken and J. Timothy Altum are independent within the definition of
independence set forth in the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange,
which is the definition that the Board has chosen to use for the purposes of
determining independence, as the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board does not
provide such a definition.
2.1
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger
among Georgia Exploration, Inc., Wharton Resources Corp., Gex Acquisition
Corp. and CodeAmerica Investments LLC, Bassam Nastat, Harbour Encap LLC
dated as of November 21, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 29, 2006).
|
|
|
3.1
|
Articles of Incorporation of
the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s
Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-133759) on Form SB-2 filed on
May 3, 2006).
|
|
|
3.2
|
Certificate of Change to
Article of Incorporation of the Company
(incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s
Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-147842) on Form SB-2/A filed
on January31, 2008).
|
|
|
3.3
|
Certificate of Amendment to
Article of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement (Registration No.
333-141234) on Form S-8 filed on March 12, 2007).
|
|
|
3.4
|
Bylaws of the Company
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration
Statement on Form 8-A filed on November 9, 2006).
|
|
|
4.1
|
Specimen Stock Certificate
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration
Statement on Form 8-A filed on November 9, 2006).
|
|
|
4.2+
|
2007 Non-Qualified Stock
Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Company’s Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-141234) on Form S-8
filed on March 12, 2007).
|
|
|
10.1
|
Property Acquisition Agreement
between the Company and Shaheen Jivraj-Sangara dated as March 2, 2006
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Registration
Statement on Form SB-2 (Registration No. 333-133759 ) filed on May 3,
2006)
|
|
|
10.2
|
Trust Agreement between the
Company and Shaheen Jivraj-Sangara dated as March 2, 2006 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form
SB-2 (Registration No. 333-133759) filed on May 3, 2006)
|
|
|
10.3
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement
between CodeAmerica Investments, LLC and Wharton Resources LP dated
effective October 1, 2006
(incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed on
January 22, 2007).
|
|
|
10.4
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement
between CodeAmerica Investments, LLC and Wharton Resources LP dated
effective February 1, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed on January 22,
2007).
|
|
|
10.5
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement
between Orbit Energy, LLC and Wharton Resources LP dated effective
September 1, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed on January 22, 2007).
|
|
|
10.6
|
Assignment of Oil and Gas Mineral
Leases by and between CodeAmerica Investments, LLC and Wharton Resources
LP for its oil and gas lease interests located in
Wharton County
,
Texas
dated effective April 28,
2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB filed on January 22, 2007).
|
|
|
10.7
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement
between Orbit Energy, LLC and Wharton Resources LP dated effective January
30, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 5, 2007).
|
|
|
10.8
|
Convertible Unsecured
Promissory Note issued by the Company to Orbit Energy, LLC dated January
30, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 5, 2007).
|
|
|
10.9
|
Assignment of Working Interest
in Oil and Gas Wells Mound Branch Prospect dated January 30, 2007
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on February 5, 2007).
|
|
|
10.10
|
Assignment of Oil and
Gas Mineral Leases
Elk County
,
Kansas
dated January 30, 2007
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on February 5, 2007).
|
|
|
10.11
|
Convertible Secured Note and
Associated Warrant by and between NCIM Limited and Gulf Western Petroleum
Corporation, effective July 3, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.9 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed on July 17,
2007).
|
10.12
|
Securities Purchase
Agreement dated as of September 10, 2007 between Gulf Western Petroleum
Corporation and Metage Funds Limited and NCIM Limited
(incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
September 13, 2007).
|
|
|
10.13
|
Senior Secured Note dated
September 10, 2007 issued by Gulf Western Petroleum Corporation to Metage
Funds Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 13, 2007).
|
|
|
10.14
|
Senior Secured Note dated
September 10, 2007 issued by Gulf Western Petroleum Corporation to NCIM
Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 13, 2007).
|
|
|
10.15
|
Warrant to Purchase Common
Stock dated September 10, 2007 issued by Gulf Western Petroleum
Corporation to Metage Funds Limited and NCIM Limited (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on September 13, 2007).
|
|
|
10.16
|
Security Agreement dated
September 10, 2007 between Gulf Western Petroleum Corporation, Gulf
Western Petroleum, LP, Wharton Resources Corp., Wharton Resources LLC and
Metage Funds Limited, in its capacity as collateral agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on September 13, 2007).
|
|
|
10.17
|
Pledge Agreement dated
September 10, 2007 between Gulf Western Petroleum Corporation, Gulf
Western Petroleum, LP, Wharton Resources Corp., Wharton Resources LLC and
Metage Funds Limited, in its capacity as collateral agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on September 13, 2007).
|
|
|
10.18
|
Guaranty dated September 10,
2007 between Gulf Western Petroleum, LP and Wharton Resources Corp.,
Wharton Resources LLC, for the benefit of Metage Funds Limited and NCIM
Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 13, 2007).
|
|
|
10.19
|
Form of Texas Mortgage, Deed
Of Trust, Assignment Of Production, Security Agreement, Fixture Filing and
Financing Statement dated September 10, 2007 by Gulf Western Petroleum, LP
to Thomas J. Perich, as Trustee for the benefit of Metage Funds Limited,
in its capacity as collateral agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.8 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 13,
2007).
|
|
|
10.20
|
Form of Kansas Mortgage, Deed
Of Trust, Assignment Of Production, Security Agreement, Fixture Filing and
Financing Statement dated September 10, 2007 by Gulf Western Petroleum, LP
to Metage Funds Limited, in its capacity as collateral agent (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on September 13, 2007).
|
|
|
10.21
|
Registration Rights Agreement
dated September 10, 2007 between Gulf Western Petroleum Corporation and
Metage Funds Limited and NCIM Limited (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
September 13, 2007).
|
|
|
16.1
|
Letter from Dale Matheson
Carr-Hilton Labonte LLP regarding change in certifying accountants
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16.1 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K/A filed on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
16.2
|
Letter from Malone &
Bailey, PC regarding change in certifying accountants (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 16.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on October 5, 2007).
|
|
|
21.1
|
Subsidiaries of the
Company
(incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed on November 29, 2007).
|
|
|
|
Consent of GBH CPAs, PC,
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
|
|
|
Consent of MHA Petroleum
Consultants, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Section 302 Certification
under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Wm. Milton Cox (principal executive
officer).
|
|
|
|
Section 302 Certification
under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Donald L. Sytsma (principal financial
and accounting officer).
|
|
|
|
Section 906 Certification
under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 0f Wm. Milton Cox (principal executive
officer).
|
|
|
|
Section 906 Certification
under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 0f Donald L. Sytsma (principal financial
and accounting officer).
|
+
|
Management contract or
compensatory plan or
arrangement
|
Item
14
.
|
Principal Accountant Fees and
Services
|
Independent Registered Public Accountant
Fees.
The aggregate fees billed by Malone
& Bailey, PC and GBH CPAs, PC for professional services rendered for the
audits of our consolidated financial statements for the years ending August 31,
2007 and August 31, 2006 are as follows:
|
|
Years Ending
|
|
|
|
August, 31 2007
|
|
|
August, 31 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
$
|
90,995
|
|
|
$
|
80,200
|
|
Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval
of Audit and Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditor.
The Board
is in the process of forming an audit committee, of which a majority of the
members will be comprised of independent directors. For the year
ended August 31, 2007, all audit and non-audit services to be provided to us
were approved by the entire Board.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this
annual report on Form 10-KSB/A to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
GULF WESTERN PETROLEUM
CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: April 21,
2008
|
By:
|
/s/ W. Milton Cox
|
|
|
W. Milton
Cox, Chairman
|
|
|
and Chief
Executive Officer
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this
annual report on Form 10-KSB has been signed by the following persons in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
|
|
Capacity In Which Signed
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ W. Milton Cox
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer and
|
|
April 21, 2008
|
W. Milton Cox
|
|
Director (Principal Executive
Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Donald L. Sytsma
|
|
Chief Financial Officer,
Corporate
|
|
April 21, 2008
|
Donald L. Sytsma
|
|
Secretary
and Treasurer and Director (Principal Financial and Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Bassam Nastat
|
|
President and Director
|
|
April 21, 2008
|
Bassam Nastat
|
|
|
|
|
Grafico Azioni Wholehealth Products (CE) (USOTC:GWPC)
Storico
Da Gen 2025 a Feb 2025
Grafico Azioni Wholehealth Products (CE) (USOTC:GWPC)
Storico
Da Feb 2024 a Feb 2025