false
0000748268
0000748268
2025-03-31
2025-03-31
iso4217:USD
xbrli:shares
iso4217:USD
xbrli:shares
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date
of Report (Date of earliest event reported): March
31, 2025
Red
Cat Holdings, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant
as specified in its charter)
Nevada
(State or other
jurisdiction of incorporation) |
|
001-40202
(Commission
File Number) |
|
88-0490034
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
15
Ave. Munoz Rivera Ste
2200
San
Juan, PR
(Address of principal executive offices) |
00901
(Zip
Code) |
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code: (833)
373-3228
Check
the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under
any of the following provisions:
☐ Written
communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
☐ Soliciting
material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
☐ Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
☐ Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: |
Title
of each class |
Trading
Symbol(s) |
Name
of each exchange on which registered |
Common
stock, par value $0.001 |
RCAT |
The
Nasdaq Capital
Market |
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this
chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).
Emerging
growth company ☐
If
an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Section 8 – Other Events
Item 8.01 Other Events
On March 31, 2025 at 4:30 p.m. eastern time, our CEO,
Jeff Thompson, held a conference call to review our financial results and to provide an update on corporate developments. The conference
call was conducted through a webcast open to the public.
A transcript of the conference call is furnished herewith
as Exhibit 99.1.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
|
RED CAT HOLDINGS, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: April 2, 2025 |
By: |
/s/ Jeffrey
M. Thompson |
|
|
Name: |
Jeffrey M. Thompson |
|
|
Title: |
Chief Executive Officer |
|
Exhibit 99.1
Red Cat Holdings, Inc. |
December 31st, 2024, Eight Month Stub Period Financial Results and Corporate Update Conference Call |
Monday, March 31, 2025, 4:30 PM Eastern |
|
CORPORATE PARTICIPANTS
Jeff Thompson - Chief Executive
Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer
|
PRESENTATION
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Good
afternoon, and welcome to the Red Cat Holdings December 31st, 2024, Eight Month Stub Period Financial Results and Corporate
Update Conference Call.
At this time, all participants are in a listen-only
mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing "*" key followed by "0." After
today's presentation, there will an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press "*" then "1" on
your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, please press "*" then "2."
Participants of this call are advised that the audio
of this conference call is being broadcast live over the internet and is also being recorded for playback purposes. A webcast replay of
the call will be available approximately one hour after the end of the call through April 30th, 2025.
Joining us today from Red Cat Holdings is Jeff Thompson,
Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer.
During this call, management will be making forward-looking
statements, including statements that address Red Cat's expectations for further performance or operational results. Forward-looking statements
involve risks and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those statements.
For more information about these risks, please refer
to the risk factors described in Red Cat's most recently filed periodic reports on Form 10-K and in Red Cat's press release that accompanies
this call, particularly the cautionary statements in it. The content of this call contains time-sensitive information that is accurate
only as of today, March 31st, 2025. Except as required by law, Red Cat disclaims any obligation to publicly update or revise
any information to reflect events or circumstances that occur after this call.
It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to Jeff
Thompson, Chief Executive Officer. Jeff, please go ahead.
Jeff Thompson
Great. Thanks. And thanks, everybody, for joining the
call tonight. This call is going to be brief as we just hosted an Investor Day late last month and plan on having another Investor Day
Town Hall in a couple of weeks. The Town Hall Investor Day will cover defense contracts, office of strategic capital funding, continuing
resolution updates, new partnerships, regulatory opportunities, and we will have the entire management team available.
Some housekeeping for this call and the reason for
its brevity. We hired Chris Ericson as our CFO a couple of weeks ago. The SEC requires the
CFO to sign the 10-K, no exceptions. This document would have taken weeks to review and did not even ask Chris to sign it. If Chris did
sign that…would sign that, it would have been a big threat flag anyway. I do want to give a shout out to Sam Pelletier, our VP
of Finance and his team did a great job on the 10-K. This CFO limit prompted to have another investor update later this month, one that
he can participate in.
Some quick updates before we open it up for questions.
So let's jump on to our Long Beach factory. Long Beach is up and running and shipped its first drones in March. We expect FlightWave to
be shipping drones every month from now on as they expand and scale the Long Beach facility and as we clean up backlog. We'll give more
details on the Investor Day Town Hall.
Some updates on the Black Widow. Visual navigation
is almost complete on the Black Widow. This is a vital feature that gives the Black Widow a unique competitive advantage. This software,
as we mentioned previously, will expand our margins. The flight data and test looks incredible. We also look forward to upgrading the
Edge 130 soon to be on the TRICON with visual navigation. I told you folks I'd be brief.
And with that, we're going to turn it right over to
questions.
QUESTION AND ANSWER
Operator
We will now begin the question and answer session.
If you wish to ask a question on today's call, you will need to press "*" then the number "1" on your telephone. If
your question has been answered and you wish to withdraw your request, you may do so by pressing "*" then "2." If
you are using the speakerphone, please pick up your handset before entering your request and speaking on the call. One moment please for
the first question.
Our first question comes from Glenn Mattson with Ladenburg
Thalmann. Please go ahead.
Glenn Mattson
Yes, hi, Jeff, thanks for taking the question. So yes,
I get that this is a quick update just on the kind of stub period. So kind of more curious about looking ahead, can you give us some sense
as to a little bit more on the timing perhaps on signing of the SRR deal, and then the scope of LRIP kind of as you're seeing it…as
they're talking about it, just the most recent update on that would be great?
Jeff Thompson
I figured everybody was going to keep going there,
even though we're having a call in a couple of weeks. But anyway, thanks for the question, Glenn. And I've talked to you quite a bit over
the last few weeks and a lot of other investors with you. So yes, so some activity is moving along. I'll just...on a high level, I'll
say we're pretty excited that the LRIP is going to be significantly higher than the nasty report that came out in January, which will
be...that will be fun to report once we officially sign. And we did...I'm pretty sure that we got the...yesterday the day before, we got
the features contract signed. So we mentioned that there was going to be three contracts this year.
First would be features, some additional features for
the Black Widow for the SRR program. Then we signed LRIP, which we hope it's very soon, and we'll let you know as soon as we do, probably
during the Town Hall. And then we have mass-production later this year. So again, nothing has changed except we knocked one of those off
the list and that we're pretty excited about where LRIP will probably land.
Glenn Mattson
Great. That's helpful. Just as a quick follow-up on
the international front. Can you just talk about opportunities you're seeing with either NATO allies or in the Pacific, just a general
update based on...versus where you might have thought about it a month ago or so when you did the Investor Day?
Jeff Thompson
Yes. Actually, I'm getting that question quite a bit
now, mostly because of the tip between President Trump and Zelensky. Everyone thought that everyone's kind of going to turn into anti-US,
based drones. Just to be very blunt and frank here, there are almost no drones in the category of the Black Widow just because DJI unless
you do Chinese drones, which NATO won't use, there's almost no companies in that category, in the Black Widow category because DJI put
them all out of business over the years. And specifically, there's nothing that's as robust as the Black Widow…not only robust,
with the modular design. It's a very rugged drone, unlike a Chinese drone that feels like a toy. It's it has EW capabilities and now has
visual navigation.
So, a couple of things. One is, we're continuing on
the previous tenders and RFPs that everyone's getting frustrated that we have not updated on yet, but those are continuing. But there
was a consortium put together of all of the Europeans. It wasn't massive, but it was a few billion dollars to push Ukraine in. And we
were not excluded from some of these people looking to put together some tenders for that. So, Europe is not ignoring US manufacturers
because of the tip between the Ukraine and the United States. So, all those things are still ongoing, and some of them are actually more
enhanced now.
Glenn Mattson
Okay. Great. Good luck on that, and I'll, jump back
in the queue. Thanks.
Operator
Our next question comes from Mike Latimore with Northland
Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Mike Latimore
Alright. Yes, thanks very much. Great to hear about
the feature contracts here. And then you mentioned the VNav software, in the prepared remarks. I guess, how should we think about that
relative to your guidance? Would that...would cross sales? Would that be incremental to guidance or how do we think about that in terms
of the financial impact?
Jeff Thompson
Yes, great question. Yes. So, we have not added that
to any of our guidance yet. It's a…I don't want to say it's expensive that's the wrong word, but it's such a required piece of
software on every drone from now on. And it's from one of the best software companies in the world. We think that we'll be able to get
full price, although we haven't announced the pricing that we're working on with Palantir I got to see the first video the other day,
it's just incredible, and to have this capability. It is one of the biggest problems that the army is having actually every branch is
happening because GPS just do not work, putting any modules on a drone like the Black Widow would reduce flight time. There's a lot of
quick fix hardware; platforms that just really don't work for drones our size. And frankly, nobody has basically real-time map updates
like Palantir can provide. So, we're partnered with Palantir on this digital navigation. We couldn't have a better partner, because they're
going to dominate digital navigation. But yes, it's not included in any of our guidance yet so far. Once we get a quarter under our belt
selling the software feature, we will probably update the sheet after we have a full quarter of selling this product.
Mike Latimore
And then how about just in terms of your company moving
to Palantir's operating system, maybe a quick update on the status of that and when do you think that might be complete?
Jeff Thompson
Yes, we're just implementing it now. It was…I
actually was able to be a keynote, week before last out in Palo Alto. Got to meet with a lot of other companies that are using it, like
Palantir, like Anduril, Saronic and companies like that. And they think it's going to improve their margins, that's how well the system
can work. So, we're just in the very first few weeks of the installation. The good news is they're much quicker than if you've ever been
through an SAP install, it's a much different game already. So, we're glad that we're getting it done right now before we're in mass production.
But we believe it's going to give us, so many efficiencies get rid of a lot of redundancy across all of the factories. And as other companies
have stated they think it's going to improve their margins dramatically.
Mike Latimore
Yes, make sense. Just last thing for me, and this may
be more of a Town Hall question. But at your Analyst Day, you talked about the prospect's…potential of additional SRR funds this
year not next year, but this year. Again, any additional, context for you into that?
Jeff Thompson
Yes, it was a little scary, if they didn't send that
extension in then all kind of, as they say on the Hill apps we are going to be basically deleted, but they did continue it. So, as Brendan
mentioned on our last Investor Day last month, we requested another additional $100 million to, what we wanted for 2025, which ends in
September. We're feeling pretty good about what LRIP is going to be for…through September. I think we'll be very…we're very
comfortable with our 25 to 65 guidance already and that's not even, we also get one full quarter of 2026 with the SRR contract.
So, we asked for additional $100 million frankly just
because this is…this administration every single person that's talking to them is talking about that drones are the future for
warfare that you're only going to have drones on the fronts, whether it's generals that are speaking at West Point, whether it's Elon
Musk, whether it's some of the most influential people at the administration, they are all moving away from exquisite, expensive systems
into drones like ours. And having a program of record, as this is happening with this new administration doesn't hurt. So, we asked for
an additional $100 million for 2025. We're prepared to deliver that if they're able to get that, maybe it ends up being 50, 25, 75, we
don't know or it could be nothing. We're not depending on it whatsoever. But as I mentioned, we're very, pleased with where we are probably
with LRIP, with the last few meetings that we've had on it.
Mike Latimore
Alright, great. Thanks very much.
Operator
This concludes our question and answer session. I would
like to turn the conference back over to Jeff Thompson for any closing remarks.
CONCLUSION
Jeff Thompson
Well, thanks, everybody, for joining. I apologize for
the brief call, but we'll give a detailed update later this month with the entire management team. We believe this will be much more beneficial
for investors in reviewing a stub period covering two months from last year. Thanks again, everyone, and look forward to talking to you
in a couple of weeks.
Operator
The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending
today's presentation. You may now disconnect.
v3.25.1
X |
- DefinitionBoolean flag that is true when the XBRL content amends previously-filed or accepted submission.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_AmendmentFlag |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionFor the EDGAR submission types of Form 8-K: the date of the report, the date of the earliest event reported; for the EDGAR submission types of Form N-1A: the filing date; for all other submission types: the end of the reporting or transition period. The format of the date is YYYY-MM-DD.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_DocumentPeriodEndDate |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:dateItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionThe type of document being provided (such as 10-K, 10-Q, 485BPOS, etc). The document type is limited to the same value as the supporting SEC submission type, or the word 'Other'.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_DocumentType |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:submissionTypeItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionAddress Line 1 such as Attn, Building Name, Street Name
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityAddressAddressLine1 |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionAddress Line 2 such as Street or Suite number
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityAddressAddressLine2 |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- Definition
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityAddressCityOrTown |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country code.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityAddressCountry |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:countryCodeItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionCode for the postal or zip code
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityAddressPostalZipCode |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionA unique 10-digit SEC-issued value to identify entities that have filed disclosures with the SEC. It is commonly abbreviated as CIK.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityCentralIndexKey |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:centralIndexKeyItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionIndicate if registrant meets the emerging growth company criteria.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityEmergingGrowthCompany |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionCommission file number. The field allows up to 17 characters. The prefix may contain 1-3 digits, the sequence number may contain 1-8 digits, the optional suffix may contain 1-4 characters, and the fields are separated with a hyphen.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityFileNumber |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:fileNumberItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionTwo-character EDGAR code representing the state or country of incorporation.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityIncorporationStateCountryCode |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:edgarStateCountryItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionThe exact name of the entity filing the report as specified in its charter, which is required by forms filed with the SEC.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityRegistrantName |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionThe Tax Identification Number (TIN), also known as an Employer Identification Number (EIN), is a unique 9-digit value assigned by the IRS.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityTaxIdentificationNumber |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:employerIdItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionLocal phone number for entity.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_LocalPhoneNumber |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionBoolean flag that is true when the Form 8-K filing is intended to satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant as pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 13e -Subsection 4c
+ Details
Name: |
dei_PreCommencementIssuerTenderOffer |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionBoolean flag that is true when the Form 8-K filing is intended to satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant as pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 14d -Subsection 2b
+ Details
Name: |
dei_PreCommencementTenderOffer |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionTitle of a 12(b) registered security.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b
+ Details
Name: |
dei_Security12bTitle |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:securityTitleItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionName of the Exchange on which a security is registered.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection d1-1
+ Details
Name: |
dei_SecurityExchangeName |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:edgarExchangeCodeItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionBoolean flag that is true when the Form 8-K filing is intended to satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant as soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 14a -Subsection 12
+ Details
Name: |
dei_SolicitingMaterial |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionTrading symbol of an instrument as listed on an exchange.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_TradingSymbol |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:tradingSymbolItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionBoolean flag that is true when the Form 8-K filing is intended to satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant as written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Securities Act -Number 230 -Section 425
+ Details
Name: |
dei_WrittenCommunications |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
Grafico Azioni Red Cat (NASDAQ:RCAT)
Storico
Da Mar 2025 a Apr 2025
Grafico Azioni Red Cat (NASDAQ:RCAT)
Storico
Da Apr 2024 a Apr 2025