TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.  )
Filed by the Registrant ☑
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐
Preliminary Proxy Statement
☐
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
☑
Definitive Proxy Statement
☐
Definitive Additional Materials
☐
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12
TELOS CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
 
 
 
 
☑
 
 
No fee required
☐
 
 
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials
☐
 
 
Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TELOS CORPORATION
19886 Ashburn Road, Ashburn, Virginia 20147-2358
 
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held on Thursday, May 8, 2025
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Telos Corporation, a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), will be held in the Meeting Room at the Company’s headquarters located at 19886 Ashburn Road, Ashburn, Virginia, 20147-2358, on Thursday, May 8, 2025 at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
The Annual Meeting is being held for the following purposes:
1.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS: To elect seven Directors to the Board of Directors to serve until the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their successors are elected and qualified;
2.
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM: To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm;
3.
AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 2016 OMNIBUS LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN: To approve Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan of the Company, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Plan Amendment”);
4.
ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION: To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers or “say-on-pay”; and
5.
OTHER BUSINESS: To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.
The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice.
The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March 17, 2025 as the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
We will be using the SEC’s Notice and Access model, which allows us to make the proxy materials available on the Internet as the primary means of furnishing proxy materials to stockholders. On or about March 28, 2025, we will mail to all stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, which contains instructions for accessing our proxy materials on the Internet and voting by telephone or on the Internet. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials also contains instructions for requesting a printed set of proxy materials. The Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, are also available at: https://investors.telos.com/.
Your vote is important to us. Whether you plan to participate in the Annual Meeting or not, please be sure to vote. Please vote promptly by telephone or on the Internet by following the instructions on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.
By order of the Board of Directors.
 
Helen M. Oh, Secretary
Ashburn, Virginia
 
March 28, 2025

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TELOS CORPORATION
19886 Ashburn Road, Ashburn, Virginia 20147-2358
 
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 8, 2025
This Proxy Statement is furnished by Telos Corporation, a Maryland corporation (“Telos”, the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our”), to the holders of the Company’s Common Stock in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“2025 Annual Meeting”) of the Company to be held on May 8, 2025, 10:00 a.m. EDT, for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“Annual Meeting Notice”).
The Company’s Board of Directors is soliciting proxies from holders of Common Stock, and the voting recommendations are:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Proposal
 
 
Items of Business
 
 
Recommendation
1
 
 
Election of the Directors: John B. Wood (Chairman), David Borland, Bonnie Carroll, Derrick D. Dockery, Brad Jacobs, John W. Maluda, Fredrick D. Schaufeld
 
 
“FOR” each of the nominees
2
 
 
Ratification of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025
 
 
“FOR”
3
 
 
Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Telos Corporation Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan
 
 
“FOR”
4
 
 
To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers
 
 
“FOR”
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The entire cost of soliciting these proxies will be borne by the Company. As needed, the Company will request brokers and others to send proxy forms and other proxy material to the beneficial owners of the Common Stock and reimbursement will be provided for any reasonable expenses incurred in so doing. If we deem necessary, the Company may also request its employees to solicit proxies from the stockholders personally or by telephone. The Company may retain a proxy solicitor to assist in the solicitation of proxies, for which the Company would pay usual and customary fees.
The Annual Meeting Notice, this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 are available at https://materials.proxyvote.com/87969B and on the Company website at http://investors.telos.com.
We are making the proxy materials available to stockholders on the Internet under the SEC’s Notice and Access model. We believe the electronic method of delivery under the Notice and Access model will decrease postage and printing expenses, expedite delivery of proxy materials and reduce our environmental impact, and we encourage you to take advantage of the availability of the proxy materials on the Internet. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials includes instructions for accessing the proxy materials and voting by telephone or on the Internet. Stockholders will need their unique control number which appears on their Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (printed in the box and marked by the arrow), the proxy card and the instructions that accompany the proxy materials in order to access the voting site. Beneficial stockholders who do not have a control number may gain access by logging into their broker, brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee’s (collectively referred to as “Nominee”) website and selecting the shareholder communications mailbox to link through to the 2025 Annual Meeting material. Instructions should also be provided on the voting instruction card provided by your Nominee.
If you would like to receive a full printed set of the proxy materials in the mail, please follow the instructions in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for requesting such materials.
Voting Procedures
Record Date. The record date for determining the stockholders entitled to vote at the 2025 Annual Meeting is March 17, 2025 (“Record Date”). As of the Record Date, there were 74,870,155 shares of Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the 2025 Annual Meeting.
Votes. Each holder of Common Stock is entitled to one vote per share of Common Stock held for Proposals 1 through 4, and any other issue to be decided at the Annual Meeting.
Voting Methods. Instruction on voting is provided in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, which contains instructions for accessing our proxy materials on the Internet and voting by telephone or on the Internet.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

If you hold shares of the Company directly in your name with our transfer agent, Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, Inc., you are a “stockholder of record” or “registered stockholder”. If you are a stockholder of record, the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials has been sent directly to you by the Company or by our representative. If you own your shares indirectly through a Nominee, your shares are said to be held in “street name.” Technically, your Nominee will vote those shares. In this case, the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will be forwarded to you by your broker, bank, other financial institution, or other designated representative. Through this process, your bank or broker collects voting instructions from all of its customers who hold shares of the Company and then submits those votes to us.
For shares held in “street name,” when a Nominee does not receive voting instructions from its customers, the question arises whether the Nominee nonetheless has the discretion to vote those shares. For routine matters, NASDAQ gives Nominees the discretion to vote, even if they have not received voting instructions from their customers or the “beneficial owners” of such shares. In this Proxy Statement, only the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, (Proposal 2) is a matter considered routine by NASDAQ. If you are a beneficial owner of shares of our Common Stock, your Nominee will NOT be able to vote your shares with respect to the election of directors (Proposal 1), the approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (Proposal 3), and the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (Proposal 4) unless you give your Nominee specific voting instructions. A “broker non-vote” occurs when your Nominee submits a proxy for your shares but does not indicate a vote for a particular proposal because the Nominee does not have the authority to vote on that proposal since the Nominee has not received instructions from you. Broker non-votes and abstentions are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present. Only “FOR” and “AGAINST” votes are counted for purposes of determining the votes cast in connection with each proposal. Therefore, broker non-votes will not be counted as a vote “FOR” the election of directors in Proposal 1 and will have no effect on determining the result of the vote. Broker non-votes and abstentions will not be counted as a vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” Proposals 2 through 4 and will have no effect on the result of the vote.
Quorum and Vote Required. A quorum consists of stockholders representing a majority of the votes by holders of Common Stock entitled to be cast at the 2025 Annual Meeting. Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of Common Stock if a quorum is present. Only votes cast “FOR” a nominee will be counted in the election of directors. Votes that are withheld with respect to one or more nominees will result in those nominees receiving fewer votes but will not count as a vote against the nominees. The affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast by the holders of Common Stock at the 2025 Annual Meeting if a quorum is present is required to ratify the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm, to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, and to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers or “say-on-pay.” You have the right to vote “FOR” or “AGAINST,” or to “ABSTAIN” from voting, in connection with Proposals 2 through 4.
Meeting Attendance. Registered holders of the Common Stock who plan to attend the meeting in person should mark the attendance box on their proxy card, and bring a copy of the proxy card with them to the meeting. Ballots will also be available at the meeting. Beneficial owners of the Common Stock that is held by a Nominee must provide adequate proof of ownership. In addition, due to security requirements at the Company’s headquarters, a government issued photo identification will be required for admission to the 2025 Annual Meeting.
Revocation of Proxies. A registered holder of the Common Stock who has provided a proxy to the Company may revoke the proxy at any time before the underlying shares are voted at the 2025 Annual Meeting by:
(1)
Executing a proxy dated later than the most recent proxy given and mailing it to:
Corporate Secretary
Telos Corporation
19886 Ashburn Road
Ashburn, VA 20147
(2)
Appearing in person and voting using a ballot at the Annual Meeting, or
(3)
Filing an instrument of revocation with the Inspector of Elections at the 2025 Annual Meeting.
If shares of Common Stock are held in the name of a Nominee, the beneficial owner of those shares must contact the Nominee in order to change a vote. The Inspector of Elections will record each vote according to the latest instructions received from the respective stockholder.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
 
 
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
 
 
1
Director Nominees
 
 
1
Board of Directors Nomination Process
 
 
5
Independence of Directors
 
 
5
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
 
 
6
Meetings of the Board of Directors and Committees of the Board of Directors
 
 
6
Compensation of Directors
 
 
7
Stockholder Communications with Board of Directors
 
 
8
Corporate Governance
 
 
8
Corporate Governance Guidelines
 
 
8
Insider Trading Policy
 
 
8
Information Security and Risk Oversight
 
 
9
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Matters
 
 
10
Advisory Board
 
 
10
PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
12
Report of the Audit Committee
 
 
12
PROPOSAL 3: APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 2016 OMNIBUS LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
 
 
14
Summary of 2016 LTIP
 
 
17
PROPOSAL 4: ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
 
 
21
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
 
 
21
Management Development and Compensation Committee Report
 
 
38
Summary Compensation Table
 
 
39
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
 
 
40
Outstanding Equity Awards At Fiscal Year-End
 
 
41
Stock Vested
 
 
41
Potential Payment Upon Termination or Change in Control
 
 
41
Executive Officers
 
 
43
2024 CEO Pay Ratio
 
 
44
Pay Versus Performance
 
 
45
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
 
 
48
Stockholder Proposals for the 2026 Annual Meeting
 
 
50
Delinquent Section 16 Reports
 
 
50
Other Matters
 
 
50
Exhibit A
 
 
51
 
 
 
 
i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors of Telos recommends that the Director Nominees named below be elected by the holders of the Company’s Common Stock.
The election of directors requires a plurality of the voting power of the shares of our Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the 2025 Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon. Only votes cast “FOR” a nominee will be counted in the election of directors. Broker non-votes and abstentions will not be counted. Votes that are withheld with respect to one or more nominees will result in those nominees receiving fewer votes but will not count as a vote against the nominees.
Director Nominees
The Company’s Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has nominated the following individuals for election as directors by the holders of the Common Stock, to serve until his or her successor is elected and qualified: John B. Wood, David Borland, Bonnie Carroll, Derrick D. Dockery, Brad Jacobs, Maj. Gen. (ret) John W. Maluda, and Fredrick D. Schaufeld. Each of our directors is a United States citizen.
 
 
 
 
John B. Wood
Chairman, CEO
 
Director since 2000
 
Age | 61
 
Committees | None
 
 
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board of the Company. Mr. Wood joined the Company in 1992 as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and in 1994 was named President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) until March 2000, when he was appointed to the newly created position of Executive Chairman of the Board. In 2002, he became Chairman of the Board subsequent to a restructuring of the Board of Directors. In January 2003, Mr. Wood resumed the positions of President and CEO. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Wood worked on Wall Street for Dean Witter Reynolds, UBS Securities, and his own boutique investment bank. Mr. Wood currently serves on the boards of Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors, Inc. (TAPS), the INOVA Foundation and the Wolf Trap Foundation.
 
Mr. Wood holds a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration in finance and computer science from Georgetown University.
 
As the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Mr. Wood provides the Board with not only knowledge of the daily workings of the Company, but also the essential experience and expertise that can be provided only by a person who is intimately involved in running the Company. Due to Mr. Wood’s broad knowledge and experience with the Company and its offerings, he is considered to have cybersecurity expertise. His experience with the Company’s stockholders, partners, customers, and vendors, resulting from his long tenure with the Company, are invaluable to the Board.
 
 
 
 
David Borland
Independent Director
 
Director since 2004
 
Age | 77
 
Committees | Management Development and Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair)
 
 
President, Borland Group, an information technology consulting company, since January 2004. Mr. Borland was elected to the Board of Directors in March 2004 after retiring as Deputy Chief Information Officer (“CIO”) of the U.S. Army with more than 30 years of experience in the U.S. Government. Mr. Borland’s U.S. Army career experience also includes serving as Vice Director of Information Systems for Command, Control, Communications, and Computers; Director of the Information Systems Selection and Acquisition Agency; and numerous other positions. From 1966 through 1970, Mr. Borland served in the U.S. Air Force. Mr. Borland received numerous awards, including the Meritorious Presidential Rank Award for Senior Executive Service Members (1996 and 2003), the Distinguished Presidential Rank Award (2000), and the U.S. Army Decoration for Exceptional Civilian Service (1998 and 2003).
 
Mr. Borland holds a Master’s Degree in Finance from George Washington University.
 
Mr. Borland’s industry experience and extensive service with the U.S. Army and the U.S. Air Force make him a valuable member of the Board of Directors.
 
 
 
 
1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 
 
 
Bonnie Carroll
Independent Director
 
Director since 2020
 
Age | 67
 
Committees | Audit, Management Development and Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance
 
 
President and Founder, Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors, Inc. (TAPS), a non-profit organization that provides comfort, care, and resources to family members grieving the death of a member of the military, since 1994. Ms. Carroll was elected to the Board in September 2020. Ms. Carroll has also held appointments in the government, including White House Liaison at the Department of Veteran Affairs under President George W. Bush, Executive Assistant to the President for Cabinet Affairs under President Reagan, and Senior Advisor to the Iraqi Ministry of Communications during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Ms. Carroll retired as a Major in the Air Force Reserve following 31 years of service, where her career included serving as Chief, Casualty Operations, HQ USAF. Prior to joining the USAFR, Maj. Carroll served 16 years as both a noncommissioned officer and then a commissioned officer in the Air National Guard as a Transportation Officer, Logistics Officer, and Executive Officer.
 
Ms. Carroll holds a degree in Public Administration and Political Science from American University and has completed the Harvard University John F. Kennedy School of Government’s Executive Leadership Program on International Conflict Resolution. She is a graduate of several military service schools, including the USAF Logistics Officer Course, Squadron Officers School, Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute, Academy of Military Science and USAF Basic Training (Honor Graduate). Ms. Carroll received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from President Barack Obama and the Zachary and Elizabeth Fisher Distinguished Civilian Humanitarian Award from the U.S. Department of Defense.
 
Ms. Carroll’s extensive service in the military, civilian agencies, and non-profit work serving family members of military service men and woman, and the recognition of her service by the highest level of government, make her a valuable member of the Board of Directors.
 
 
 
 
Derrick D. Dockery
Independent Director
 
Director since 2022
 
Age | 44
 
Committees | Management Development and Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance
 
 
U.S. Government Affairs at TikTok, since June 2020. Mr. Dockery was elected to the Board on January 19, 2022. Mr. Dockery is the Co-Founder of Yellow Ribbons United, a non-profit founded in 2013, which leverages professional sports platforms and resources of corporate America to increase awareness of issues affecting retired and active-duty military personnel and their families. Previously, Mr. Dockery worked at the U.S. House of Representatives for Speaker Paul Ryan (2016-2019) as Business and Intergovernmental Coalition Director; Chairman Jason Chaffetz, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee (2015-2016) as Communications and Coalitions Coordinator; and Chairman Paul Ryan, House Budget Committee Office (2013-2015) as Communications Press Assistant. From 2003 to 2013, Mr. Dockery played professional football as an offensive lineman for the Dallas Cowboys, Washington Redskins (now called the Commanders), and the Buffalo Bills.
 
Mr. Dockery holds a Bachelor of Science in Education with a minor in Communications from the University of Texas in Austin, Texas and a Master of Business Administration from George Washington University in Washington, D.C.
 
Mr. Dockery’s experience working in Congress and his relationships in the business community make him a valuable member of the Board of Directors.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 
 
 
Brad Jacobs
Independent Director
 
Director since 2022
 
Age | 67
 
Committees | Audit (Chair), Management Development and Compensation
 
 
Adjunct Professor at Rollins College in Florida and Consultant since January 2015. Mr. Jacobs was elected to the Board on January 19, 2022. Mr. Jacobs is a consultant for various law firms regarding U.S. Department of Defense and agency bid protests. From November 2000 until September 2014, Mr. Jacobs served in various finance roles at BAE Systems, Inc., which had 43,700 employees worldwide and generated approximately $12 billion in sales in 2013. At BAE Systems, Inc., he held the following positions: Senior Vice President, Finance (March 2009 to September 2014); Vice President, Finance, Mergers & Acquisitions (September 2007 to February 2009); and Vice President, Finance, Electronics & Integrated Solutions Operating Group (November 2000 to August 2007). From March 1992 until November 2000, Mr. Jacobs worked in various management roles at Lockheed Martin Company. Mr. Jacobs also serves on the Board of Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors, Inc. (TAPS) and the Jewish Federation for Greater Orlando.
 
Mr. Jacobs holds a Bachelor of Science in Finance (with honors in Economics) from the University of Maryland and a Master of Science in Industrial Administration from Purdue University.
 
Mr. Jacobs’s education, his extensive experience with major defense contractors, and his focus on financial matters within those companies, make him a valuable member of the Board of Directors.
 
 
 
 
John W. Maluda
(Maj. Gen. USAF, Ret.)
 
Director since 2009
 
Age | 71
 
Committees | None
 
 
Retired, U.S. Air Force Major General. General Maluda was elected to the Board in October 2009. He retired from the U.S. Air Force in September 2009 after more than 34 years of continuous active duty. At the time of his retirement, General Maluda was Director of Cyberspace Transformation and Strategy, in the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, and Chief Information Officer. In that capacity, he shaped doctrine, strategy, and policy for communications and information activities and served as the functional advocate for 30,000 personnel. Previously, General Maluda was Vice Commander, 8th Air Force, at Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana. General Maluda enlisted in the Air Force in 1973 and received his commission in 1978 as a distinguished graduate of the ROTC program at Troy State University in Alabama. His career highlights include serving at three major commands, with unified combatant commands, a defense agency, the White House, and the Air Staff. General Maluda’s staff experience included positions at Headquarters U.S. Air Force, Air Combat Command, U.S. Air Force in Europe, Air Force Special Operations Command, U.S. Space Command and the White House Communications Agency.
 
General Maluda holds a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering from Auburn University, a Master’s Degree in Systems Management from the University of Southern California, and Master’s Director Certification from the American College of Corporate Directors, a public company director education and credentialing organization
 
General Maluda’s comprehensive experience with the U.S. Air Force, cybersecurity expertise as a former CIO, and broad industry insight make him a valuable member of the Board of Directors.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 
 
 
Fredrick D. Schaufeld
Independent Director
 
Director since 2020
 
Age | 65
 
Committees | Audit, Management Development and Compensation (Chair)
 
 
Co-founder and Managing Director of SWaN & Legend Venture Partners (SWaN) since 2006. Mr. Schaufeld was elected to the Board in November 2020. Mr. Schaufeld is a Partner in Monumental Sports and Entertainment, which owns the Washington Capitals (NHL), Wizards (NBA), Mystics (WNBA), Capital City Go-Go (NBA-G) and the Capital One Arena. He is a Partner in the Washington Nationals (MLB), Team Liquid (e-Sports), the Professional Fighters League (PFL) and the Hill Top House Hotel, Harpers Ferry. Mr. Schaufeld also owns American Bike Ride, the parent of DC Bike Ride. Prior to SWaN, Mr. Schaufeld founded and led NEW Corp. (NEW), which was acquired by Asurion (now NEW Asurion) in 2008. Mr. Schaufeld currently sits on the boards of several private companies. Mr. Schaufeld is the recipient of Ernst & Young’s “Entrepreneur of the Year” award, is a member of the Horatio Alger Association, and is a member of the Economic Club of Washington, D.C., the Young Presidents Organization (YPO) and its Peace Action Network Arab American Action Forum. Mr. Schaufeld also sits of the board of several charitable organizations, including the Wolf Trap Foundation.
 
Mr. Schaufeld received his Bachelor’s degree in Government from Lehigh University.
 
Mr. Schaufeld’s extensive experience in business and finance, as well as his service to various local charitable organizations, makes him a valuable member of the Board of Directors.
 
 
 
 
4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Board of Directors Nomination Process
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Nominating Committee”) identifies potential candidates for first-time nomination as a director by using a variety of sources such as recommendations from our management, current Board members, stockholders, and contacts in organizations served by the Company. Stockholders may nominate potential candidates by following the procedure set forth in the Company’s Bylaws. This process provides that, in order for nominations or other business to be properly brought before an annual meeting of stockholders by a stockholder, the stockholder must deliver written notice to the Company’s secretary at our principal executive offices not less than sixty (60) days nor more than ninety (90) days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event that the date of the annual meeting is advanced by more than thirty (30) days or delayed by more than sixty (60) days from such anniversary date, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so delivered not earlier than the ninetieth (90th) day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the sixtieth (60th) day prior to such annual meeting or the tenth (10th) day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. The Nominating Committee will consider any director nominees submitted by stockholders in accordance with these procedures.
The Nominating Committee conducts an initial review of the potential candidate’s background, including whether the individual meets the minimum qualifications for Board members; whether the individual would be considered independent under the standards adopted by the Company and NASDAQ rules; and whether the individual would meet any additional requirements imposed by law or regulation on members of the Audit and/or Compensation Committees of the Board. Among the requirements considered by the committee for potential candidates are the following: U.S. citizenship; ten (10) years of relevant business experience, preferably having served on the board of directors of a corporation; and familiarity with information technology and security. The Nominating Committee will also consider the number of other public company boards on which a nominee serves. Services in other boards and/or committees should be consistent with the Company’s conflict of interest policies. The Company believes that the Board should reflect a diversity of backgrounds and expertise. The Nominating Committee takes into account diversity considerations in determining nominees for directors and planning for director succession and believes that, as a group, the current directors and nominees bring a diverse range of perspectives to the Board’s deliberations. The evaluation process of a potential candidate’s background will not be treated differently whether or not the individual was nominated by a stockholder.
If the initial candidate review is satisfactory, the Nominating Committee will arrange an introductory meeting with the candidate and the Company’s CEO or other directors to determine the potential candidate’s interest in serving on the Board. If the candidate is interested in serving on the Board and the Nominating Committee recommends further consideration, a comprehensive interview will follow, conducted by the Nominating Committee, the CEO, other members of the Board, and in some cases, key Company executives. Upon successful conclusion of the review process, the Nominating Committee will present the candidate’s name to the Board of Directors for nomination as a director and inclusion in the Company’s Proxy Statement.
New directors will participate in a comprehensive orientation about the Company, including our history, current business operations, strategy and governance. New directors have one-on-one sessions with the CEO, other directors and senior management. New Audit Committee members will also have one-on-one sessions with the Company’s independent auditors. Members of our senior management regularly review with the Board the operating plan of each of our business segments and the Company as a whole. The Board also conducts periodic site visits to our Ashburn facility as part of its regularly scheduled Board meetings and directors are encouraged to visit on an ad hoc basis and meet with members of senior management and other employees. Directors are encouraged to attend outside director continuing education programs sponsored by educational and other institutions to assist them in staying abreast of developments in corporate governance and critical issues relating to the operations of a public company board.
Independence of Directors
The Board has determined that each of the individuals nominated to serve on the Board (except for Mr. John B. Wood and General Maluda) has no material relationship with the Company other than in his or her capacity as a director of the Company and that each is “independent” in accordance with the standards of NASDAQ. If all director nominees are elected to serve as our directors, independent directors will constitute a majority of our Board.
In making these determinations, the Board took into account all factors and circumstances that it considered relevant, including, where applicable, the existence of any employment relationship between the director nominee or a member
5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

of the director nominee’s immediate family and the Company; whether within the past three years the director nominee has served as an executive officer of the Company; whether the director nominee or a member of the director nominee’s immediate family has received, during any twelve-month period within the last three years, direct compensation from the Company in excess of $120,000; whether the director nominee or a member of the director nominee’s immediate family has been, within the last three years, a partner or an employee of the Company’s internal or external auditors; and whether the director nominee or a member of the director nominee’s immediate family is employed by an entity that is engaged in business dealings with the Company. The Board has not adopted categorical standards with respect to director independence. The Board believes that it is more appropriate to make independence determinations on a case-by-case basis in light of all relevant factors.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Our policies and practices with respect to related person transactions were adopted on October 25, 2007 and amended on May 14, 2021, and are available on our website at https://investors.telos.com/. Generally, any transaction between the Company and a related person in which the aggregate amount exceeds $120,000 is reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee. For purposes of this policy, a related person is any director or executive officer of Telos, any nominee for director, any holder of 5% or more of the Company’s voting securities, any immediate family members of the foregoing persons, and any firm, corporation or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed or is a partner or principal or in a similar position or in which such person has 10% or greater beneficial ownership interest.
Mr. Emmett Wood, the brother of the Chairman and CEO, Mr. John B. Wood, was an employee of the Company from 1996 and held the position of Executive Vice President, Marketing & Strategy until his resignation on February 7, 2023. The amount earned by Mr. Emmett Wood as total compensation, including stock awards and other benefits, for 2023 was $249,407.
General Maluda, through his entity, JK Maluda LLC, and the Company were parties to a consulting agreement under which General Maluda provided certain consulting services to the Company. For his services from January 1 through June 30, 2023, General Maluda received a grant on January 3, 2023 of Telos’ restricted share units valued at $87,500 (16,849 restricted share units), of which 8,430 shares vested on March 8, 2023 and 8,429 shares vested on May 18, 2023. For services rendered from July 1 to December 31, 2023, General Maluda received a retainer of $7,500 per month; $21,000 for attending seven events ($3,000 per event), such as trade shows or customer meetings; and a bonus payment of $25,000 for his role in facilitating the renewal and extension of a specific contract. The consulting agreement between Gen. Maluda and the Company expired on December 31, 2023.
Meetings of the Board of Directors and Committees of the Board of Directors
Our directors are fully committed to their Board service. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, the Board of Directors held five meetings. Each director attended at least 75%, in the aggregate, of all meetings, in person or virtually, of the Board and the respective committees of the Board on which they served.
The Company encourages all directors to attend the annual meeting of stockholders, and submit their proxy cards. All directors, except Ms. Carroll, attended the in-person 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
The Company has standing Audit, Management Development and Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee was established to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities for (1) the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, (2) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (3) the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence, and (4) the performance of the Company’s internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee currently consists of directors Jacobs (chairman), Carroll, and Schaufeld, each of whom is an independent director. In 2024, the Audit Committee met four times. The Audit Committee charter is available on the Company’s website at https://investors.telos.com/. The Board has determined that Mr. Jacobs is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and is independent.
Management Development and Compensation Committee
The Management Development and Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) was established for the purpose of reviewing, determining and approving, or recommending to the Board for approval, all forms of compensation to be provided to the Company’s executive officers and directors and any stock compensation to be
6

TABLE OF CONTENTS

provided to all employees, directors or consultants. The Compensation Committee currently consists of directors Schaufeld (chairman), Borland, Carroll, Dockery, and Jacobs, each of whom is an independent director. Mr. Jacobs was appointed to the committee on March 25, 2024. In 2024, the Compensation Committee met seven times. The Compensation Committee charter is available on the Company’s website at https://investors.telos.com/.
In September 2024, the Compensation Committee terminated the engagement of Lockton Companies, LLC as an independent executive compensation advisor and engaged Zayla Partners, LLC (“Zayla”). Zayla advises the Compensation Committee on matters relating to benchmarking compensation and designing appropriate compensation programs for our executives, senior officers and directors. As part of its consultation with the Compensation Committee, Zayla assists the Compensation Committee with the selection of an appropriate peer group of companies to use for comparison and benchmarking purposes. The Compensation Committee has direct access to Zayla and control over its engagement, although our executive management, under the direction of the Compensation Committee, interacts with Zayla for the purpose of facilitating the flow of information between the Compensation Committee and Zayla and assisting the Compensation Committee in its work. The Compensation Committee has determined that the work of Zayla and its employees as compensation consultants to the Compensation Committee has not created any conflict of interest.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The Nominating Committee was established to assist the Board in: (a) identifying, screening and reviewing individuals qualified to serve as directors and recommending to the Board (i) the director nominees for election at each annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders and (ii) candidates to fill any vacancies on the Board; and (b) developing and recommending to the Board a set of effective corporate governance policies and procedures applicable to the Company and overseeing the implementation of such policies and procedures. In 2022, the Nominating Committee was charged by the Board with oversight of the Company’s environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) strategy. In 2024, the Nominating Committee met two times. On March 13, 2024, the Nominating Committee recommended, and the Board approved, the Corporate Governance Guidelines, which were subsequently published on the Company website. The Nominating Committee currently consists of directors Borland (chairman), Carroll and Dockery, each of whom is an independent director. The Nominating Committee charter is available on the Company’s website at https://investors.telos.com/.
Compensation of Directors
The Compensation Committee recommended on May 16, 2024, and Board of Directors approved on May 21, 2024, a revised compensation structure for the directors for 2024. First, each director received $40,000 as a basic retainer, plus $5,000 per committee assignment with the chairpersons of each committee receiving an additional $10,000. These cash payments are made in equal payments quarterly. Second, each director received a long-term incentive award of 40,323 restricted share units, valued at $150,000 as of the grant date of May 21, 2024, vesting after two years, on May 21, 2026.
The following table summarizes the director compensation paid during the year ended December 31, 2024, other than for Mr. John Wood (who was not paid separate compensation for his service as a director and whose compensation is described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement). The directors did not receive any perquisites and the Company made no charitable donations under their names.
Director Compensation For 2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash
Compensation
 
 
Stock
Awards(1)
 
 
Total
David Borland
 
 
$67,500
 
 
$150,000(2)
 
 
$217,500
Bonnie Carroll
 
 
66,250
 
 
150,000(3)
 
 
216,250
Derrick D. Dockery
 
 
60,000
 
 
150,000(4)
 
 
210,000
Brad Jacobs
 
 
65,000
 
 
150,000(5)
 
 
215,000
John W. Maluda
 
 
47,500
 
 
150,000(6)
 
 
197,500
Fredrick D. Schaufeld
 
 
67,500
 
 
150,000(7)
 
 
217,500
TOTAL
 
 
$ 373,750
 
 
$ 900,000
 
 
$ 1,273,750
(1)
See assumptions made in the valuation of these awards for financial statement reporting purposes in Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(2)
Mr. Borland received a grant of 40,323 RSUs on May 21, 2024, that will vest on May 21, 2026, if Mr. Borland remains a director until such date or earlier upon a change of control of the Company. As of December 31, 2024, he also held options to acquire 52,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.
(3)
Ms. Carroll received a grant of 40,323 RSUs on May 21, 2024, that will vest on May 21, 2026, if Ms. Carroll remains a director until such date or earlier upon a change of control of the Company. As of December 31, 2024, she also held options to acquire 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.
(4)
Mr. Dockery received a grant of 40,323 RSUs on May 21, 2024, that will vest on May 21, 2026, if Mr. Dockery remains a director until such date or earlier upon a change of control of the Company. As of December 31, 2024, he also held options to acquire 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.
(5)
Mr. Jacobs received a grant of 40,323 RSUs on May 21, 2024, that will vest on May 21, 2026, if Mr. Jacobs remains a director until such date or earlier upon a change of control of the Company. As of December 31, 2024, he also held options to acquire 60,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.
(6)
Gen. Maluda received a grant of 40,323 RSUs on May 21, 2024, that will vest on May 21, 2026, if Gen. Maluda remains a director until such date or earlier upon a change of control of the Company. As of December 31, 2024, he also held options to acquire 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.
(7)
Mr. Schaufeld received a grant 40,323 RSUs on May 21, 2024, that will vest on May 21, 2026, if Mr. Schaufeld remains a director until such date or earlier upon a change of control of the Company.
Stockholder Communications with Board of Directors
Stockholders wishing to communicate with the Board of Directors should send the communication by mail to the office of the Corporate Secretary (19886 Ashburn Road, Ashburn, VA 20147) who will forward such communication to the appropriate committee of the Board of Directors or to the individual director. There have been no changes in the procedures by which stockholders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors.
Corporate Governance
Our Board and management are committed to sound corporate governance. In keeping with sound corporate governance practices, we maintain a majority of independent directors on the Board of Directors.
Mr. John B. Wood is both the Chairman of the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Our policy as to whether the roles of the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer should be separate is to adopt the practice that best serves the Company’s needs at any particular time. The Board of Directors believes that combining the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer positions is currently the most effective leadership structure and is in the best interest of the Company’s stockholders because of Mr. Wood’s long tenure with the Company, including as the Chief Executive Officer, and his broad knowledge and experience with our customers, partners and vendors and in the field of cybersecurity. The Board may decide to separate and later combine the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, if appropriate, at any time in the future. We do not have a lead independent director.
The Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct applicable to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Controller. The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available on our website at https://investors.telos.com/. In the event that the Board of Directors amends our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct or grants a waiver from the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, we will provide timely notice of such amendment or waiver on our website. In addition, our Board has adopted a Code of Ethics and Standards of Conduct to ensure that the Company adheres to ethical standards and obeys all applicable laws. The Code of Ethics and Standards of Conduct applies to the Company and to all of its subsidiaries, domestic and foreign, and all employees, consultants, officers and directors thereof. The Code of Ethics and Standards of Conduct is available on our website at https://investors.telos.com/.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Telos Corporate Governance Guidelines (“Guidelines”) ensure a common set of expectations as to how the Board, its various committees, individual directors, and management should perform their functions, and how the Board should exercise its oversight responsibility to serve the best interest of the Company in a manner that is consistent with the Board’s duties. The Guidelines serve as a flexible framework within which the Board may conduct its business, not as a set of binding legal obligations. If a conflict arises between the provisions of the Guidelines and the Charter or Bylaws of the Company, the Charter or Bylaws, as applicable, will govern. The Guidelines are available on the Company website at https://investors.telos.com/.
Insider Trading Policy
The Company has adopted an insider trading policy that governs the purchase, sale, and other transactions of our securities by our directors, officers, and employees. A copy of our insider trading policy has been filed as Exhibit 19.1
8

TABLE OF CONTENTS

to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. In addition, with regard to the Company’s trading in its own securities, it is the Company’s policy to comply with the federal securities laws and the applicable exchange listing requirements.
Information Security and Risk Oversight
As part of its general responsibility to manage the Company’s business, the Board of Directors has oversight responsibility with respect to risk management. The Board reviews matters of macro-economic, political, business, supply chain, climate and competitive risk directly with management as part of management’s regular Board reporting. The Board also receives regular updates from the Company’s legal department concerning legal and certain compliance risks. The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing risk associated with the Company’s compensation programs. The Board of Directors has delegated responsibility for risk oversight of the balance of the Company’s significant areas of risk to the Audit Committee, including financial risk, internal control over financial reporting, audit, certain compliance requirements, and information security and cybersecurity risk. In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee discharges these responsibilities through various processes, including the use of an independent third party to assist the Company with internal audits and other third-party advisers as and when it deems appropriate, and discusses with management the Company’s major policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. The Audit Committee regularly reports the results of these discussions to the Board of Directors. Our Chief Information Security Officer (“CISO”) reports to the Audit Committee at each regular Audit Committee meeting on the status of cybersecurity risk assessment, identification and management, as well as reporting information security incidents as they occur, if material, and providing periodic briefings about our information security program, our internal response preparedness, and assessments led by outside auditors. The Chair of the Audit Committee, in turn, reports on these topics to the Board of Directors as and when deemed necessary and/or material. Overall, our Board contains two directors with work experience related to cybersecurity issues or oversight.
We rely heavily on our technology and infrastructure, as well as the public cloud to an increasing degree, to provide our products and services to our customers. As a result, we have developed an ISO/ICE 27001-certified Information Security Management System (“ISMS”) to enhance our corporate security measures, identify and mitigate information security risks, and protect and preserve the confidentiality, integrity, and continued availability of all information owned by the Company and that of its customers and suppliers in our control. Our ISO certification can be verified on the BSI Group website using certificate number IS 649202.
Our ISMS includes developing, implementing, and continually improving policies and procedures to safeguard information and ensure the availability of critical data and systems. These policies cover areas such as requiring secure coding practices and a secure development lifecycle process, monthly information security awareness training for all employees and enhanced training for specialized personnel, review and assessment by external, independent third parties, who certify and report on our weaknesses and internal response preparedness for the entire Company, and the performance of daily vulnerability scanning of our network infrastructure as well as annual third-party penetration testing.
Our cybersecurity risk assessment, identification, and management process consist of a dedicated Governance Risk and Compliance (“GRC”) team, within our Information Security organization, that implements a repeatable, ISO/IEC 27001-compliant methodology to assess and track cybersecurity risk. This team, reporting to and working with the CISO, identifies, tracks, and updates cybersecurity risks that threaten the Company directly and through third parties. The GRC team collaborates closely with risk owners throughout the company, vendors, and suppliers, working with them in an effort to ensure their risks are identified, documented, and mitigated in a timely fashion.
In addition to our active ISO/ICE 27001 certification, the Company also assesses itself against the National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-171 as required by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (“DFARS”). In accordance with our ISMS, we also actively monitor known threats that could affect our products and services and work with our suppliers to provide us with real-time reports of threats or vulnerabilities that may affect our enterprise-wide systems. Our program also includes a cyber incident response plan that provides controls and procedures for timely and accurate reporting of any material cybersecurity incident as well as a business continuity plan that provides a clear framework for how the Company can continue in the event of any significant disruption to ensure that we can offer the same level of security, support, and excellence to all our customers. In the normal course, our Security and GRC teams engage assessors, consultants, and other third parties to assist in various cyber-related matters. For example, to maintain our ISO certification, the Company utilizes an external third party
9

TABLE OF CONTENTS

to conduct yearly audits of its ISMS. Our Information Security organization also leverages third-party advisors, as appropriate, for various tasks such as conducting annual third-party penetration testing.
In 2024, we conducted an enterprise risk assessment that included an assessment of cybersecurity risk in context with other enterprise-level risks. Furthermore, our CISO and our General Counsel regularly discuss cybersecurity risk mitigation. We carry errors and omissions insurance that provides some protection against the potential losses arising from a cybersecurity incident.
In 2024, we did not experience a material information security breach incident or any penalties or settlements related to the same, and the expenses we have incurred from information security breach incidents were immaterial.
In one form or another, our solutions are entirely dedicated to protecting our customers’ people, information and digital assets, and we take pride in producing products and services in support of that socially beneficial goal. We acknowledge that information and data security are of paramount importance to our business and our customers – to that end, we are focused on improving our information security practices and mitigating information security risk.
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Matters
Our Board and management believe that operating our business in line with solid governance principles and in a socially and environmentally responsible manner furthers our core values and creates the greatest value for our stakeholders. We further believe that our environmental, social and governance priorities should support sustainable long-term financial performance.
The Nominating Committee oversees our ESG matters. In 2022, we formed an ESG task force to address contractual and other compliance requirements in the ESG sphere, as well as the Company’s overall ESG strategy, including greenhouse gas reduction, industry-relevant ESG reporting, and the process by which we assess certain ESG risks and opportunities.
The Company publicly reports certain climate change-related information via CDP and provides public sustainability disclosures using the SASB Software & IT Service Standard. By making these disclosures, however, we have not concluded that the information disclosed is material to our business. We do not own or operate data centers. Many of our solutions are cloud-based or are designed to facilitate our customers’ secure cloud usage or cloud migration, thereby fostering sustainable energy use.
Our management team is committed to maintaining a corporate culture that fosters mutual respect and job satisfaction for our people while delivering innovation and value to customers and stockholders. This commitment is reflected in our core values:
Always with integrity, at Telos we:
Build trusted relationships,
Work hard together,
Design and deliver superior solutions, and
Have fun doing it.
We are committed to providing a work environment that is free of discrimination and harassment, where our employees can do their best work, bring their whole self to work, feel supported and in turn support others. We strive to create a working environment where everyone feels included and respected and has an equal opportunity to contribute.
For more information on our human capital resources, please see our 2024 annual report on Form 10-K.
Consistent with our first core value – integrity – we have established and published a Partner Code of Conduct to address the business ethics of those with whom we collaborate, and a Global Anti-Human Trafficking Policy to reinforce that Telos will not and does not tolerate or condone human trafficking in any part of its organization or business relationships. Our business is conducted in accordance with our published Code of Ethics and Standards of Conduct. Furthermore, in 2022 the Board adopted a Clawback Policy to ensure that executive compensation premised upon financial performance aligns with that performance.
Advisory Board
On May 13, 2020, we formed the Advisory Board of Telos (the “Advisory Board”), which served as advisors to the Company’s management team and the Board of Directors in the conduct of the Company’s business and the pursuit of our strategic objectives. Responsibilities of members of the Advisory Board included providing counsel and advice
10

TABLE OF CONTENTS

as may be requested from time to time; providing opinions to assist the Company in identifying and, in coordination with the Company’s management team, pursuing opportunities related to potential sales, technical issues, product development, marketing, strategic direction, and other matters; keeping the Company updated on technological, competitive and other changes and developments pertinent to the business of the Company; and, contributing to support the Company’s objectives. The Advisory Board met periodically pursuant to the needs or opportunities of the business of the Company. The term of each member of the Advisory Board expired on May 31, 2024, and the Advisory Board was disbanded.
11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors of Telos recommends that the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2025 fiscal year be ratified by the holders of the Common Stock.
The Audit Committee selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2025 fiscal year. The ratification of the selection of PwC requires a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting. Holders of Common Stock have the right to vote “FOR” or “AGAINST”, or to “ABSTAIN” from voting in connection with Proposal 2. Abstentions on Proposal 2 will have no effect on the results of the vote.
PwC was first engaged by the Company as its independent registered public accounting firm in June 2022. PwC is expected to attend the Annual Meeting and will be given an opportunity to make a statement and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Aggregate fees for professional services billed to us by PwC for the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 are summarized as follows:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2024
 
 
2023
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Audit fees(1)
 
 
$1,115,000
 
 
$1,205,000
All other fees(2)
 
 
2,000
 
 
2,000
Total
 
 
$1,117,000
 
 
$1,207,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
Audit fees include fees for the annual audit, including the integrated audit of internal control over financial reporting, the review of the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and fees for various SEC filings.
(2)
Fees consist of PwC technical accounting and financial statement disclosure guidance/research tools.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The Audit Committee pre-approves all services, including audit and non-audit services, provided by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. The independent registered public accounting firm typically provides an engagement letter to the Audit Committee outlining the scope of the services and related fees. Approval by the Audit Committee may be made at its regularly scheduled meetings or otherwise, including by telephonic or other electronic communications.
Report of the Audit Committee
The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including internal control over financial reporting. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, including the quality and acceptability of accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm, who is responsible for expressing an opinion on conformity of those audited financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, the firm’s judgment as to the quality and acceptability of the Company’s accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm under the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the SEC. In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the firm’s independence from management and the Company and received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent accountant required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence. The Audit Committee also considered whether the provision of non-audit related services by the independent registered public accounting firm was compatible with maintaining the firm’s independence and found it to be acceptable.
12

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 for filing with the SEC.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Brad Jacobs, Chairman
Bonnie L. Carroll
Fredrick D. Schaufeld
 
 
 
 
13

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL 3: APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 2016 OMNIBUS LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
The Board of Directors of the Company has approved Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan and recommends its approval by the stockholders.
On March 7, 2025, the Board of Directors of the Company approved Amendment No. 1 to the Telos Corporation Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (“Plan Amendment”) to i) increase the number of shares available for issuance by four million nine hundred thousand (4,900,000) shares, and ii) update the definition of “corporate transaction” in the Plan to reflect current best practices, subject to the approval of the stockholders at the 2025 Annual Meeting. No other substantive amendments are being proposed to the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (“2016 LTIP”). The Plan Amendment is substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. Approval of the Plan Amendment requires the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast. Holders of Common Stock have the right to vote “FOR”, “AGAINST”, or to “ABSTAIN” from voting in connection with Proposal 3.
The Company believes that the approval of the Plan Amendment is critical to our efforts to recruit and retain key employees who are important to our continued growth. Equity awards are an essential compensation component to attract top talent and any hindrance to our ability to grant awards under the 2016 LTIP will have a negative impact on our performance. Further, if the Plan Amendment is not approved, there will be insufficient shares available for issuance under the 2016 LTIP and, therefore, the Company will have to take alternative strategic actions, such as increasing the cash component of employee compensation to retain and motivate our current employees and recruit the necessary talent and skill sets to the Company. This could impair the operating cash flow and/or the ability to attract and retain the individuals necessary to drive performance results that increase long-term stockholder value. Thus, the Company believes that this proposal is entirely in the best interests of its stockholders.
Once approved, the Plan Amendment will become effective on the date of the 2025 Annual Meeting, and the available shares for issuance will increase by 4,900,000 shares. The Board of Directors is cognizant that the Company’s equity compensation program has a dilutive effect on our stockholders and continuously strives to balance this concern with our need to compete for talent using practices that are prevalent in the market, including equity grants. The Board is also cognizant that the long-term incentive equity grants the Company made in 2024 – most of which are subject to performance or market conditions – represent a significant cost at maximum possible vesting levels. The additional shares represented by the Plan Amendment, combined with those previously granted but not vested and those available for issuance under the 2016 LTIP, would represent approximately 24.6% of our outstanding Common Stock as of March 17, 2025, if all of the shares were issued under the 2016 LTIP. These additional shares combined with those available for issuance under the 2016 LTIP would represent approximately 8.0% of our outstanding Common Stock as of March 17, 2025, if all of the shares were issued under the 2016 LTIP.
The actual dilutive effect of the long-term incentive equity grants made in 2024, however, will be directly conditioned upon improvement in Company performance. As is described in greater detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth below (at page 21), the majority of the long-term incentive equity grants made in 2024 are subject to stringent performance requirements, including significant sustained increases in the price of the Company’s common stock, and it is possible that they will not vest in full. Within the context of the likely actual number of shares that will be issued pursuant to those 2024 long-term incentive equity grants and although any shares underlying awards that do not vest will be available for future grants under the terms of the 2016 LTIP, we believe the request for an additional 4,900,000 shares in the 2016 LTIP is reasonable and necessary for our business growth initiatives for 2025 and going forward. We will continue to monitor our equity use in future years in an attempt to ensure that our burn rate is within competitive market norms.
14

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding, granted, vested and forfeited in 2024 are as follows:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Restricted Share Unit Activity
 
 
Time-Based
RSU
 
 
Performance-
Based RSU
 
 
Total
 
 
Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Unvested outstanding units as of December 31, 2023
 
 
2,132,613
 
 
43,800
 
 
2,176,413
 
 
$5.07
Granted
 
 
1,844,223
 
 
10,730,226
 
 
12,574,449
 
 
3.47
Vested
 
 
(1,910,651)
 
 
—
 
 
(1,910,651)
 
 
4.41
Forfeited, cancelled or expired
 
 
(114,082)
 
 
(90,796)
 
 
(204,878)
 
 
9.25
Unvested outstanding units as of December 31, 2024
 
 
1,952,103
 
 
10,683,230
 
 
12,635,333
 
 
$3.52
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stock Option Activity
 
 
Stock
Option
Outstanding
 
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 
 
Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(in years)
 
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Outstanding option balance as of December 31, 2023
 
 
400,000
 
 
$1.80
 
 
9.4
 
 
$740,000
Granted
 
 
__
 
 
__
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exercised
 
 
(113,000)
 
 
1.80
 
 
 
 
 
 
Forfeited, cancelled, expired
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
 
 
 
 
Outstanding option balance as of December 31, 2024
 
 
287,000
 
 
$1.80
 
 
8.4
 
 
$464,940
Exercisable stock options as of December 31, 2024
 
 
287,000
 
 
$1.80
 
 
8.4
 
 
$464,940
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Board of Directors considered the historical numbers of time-based and performance-based restricted share units granted starting in 2021, after the November 18, 2020 IPO event.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Annual Share Usage
 
 
2021
 
 
2022
 
 
2023
 
 
2024
RSUs Granted
 
 
3,206,283
 
 
3,987,911
 
 
1,888,689
 
 
1,844,223
PSUs Granted
 
 
508,903
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
10,730,226
Total Equity Awards Granted
 
 
3,715,186
 
 
3,987,911
 
 
1,888,689
 
 
12,574,449
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
No stock appreciation rights or dividend equivalent rights have been issued in 2024 under the 2016 LTIP.
As of March 17, 2025, the record date, the data for our only equity incentive plan – the 2016 LTIP – reflected the following:
 
 
 
 
Restricted share units granted but unvested
 
 
12,390,535
Shares available for issuance
 
 
1,097,646
Outstanding appreciation awards
 
 
287,000 options
Weighted-average exercise price
 
 
$1.80
Weighted-average remaining term
 
 
8.14 years
 
 
 
 
As of March 17, 2025, we had 74,870,155 total shares of Common Stock outstanding.
15

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table sets forth as of December 31, 2024, information with respect to (a) number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants, and rights, (b) the weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants, and rights and (c) the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under our existing equity incentive plan. All shares under our existing equity incentive plan may be issued in the form of restricted stock, performance shares, stock appreciation rights, share units, or other stock-based awards.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(a)
 
 
(b)
 
 
(c)
 
 
 
Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights(1)
 
 
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights(2)
 
 
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
 
 
12,922,333
 
 
$1.80
 
 
962,223
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
—
Total
 
 
12,922,333
 
 
$1.80
 
 
962,223
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
This includes 287,000 shares of outstanding stock options and 12,653,333 shares issuable upon settlement of the restricted share unit awards previously granted but not yet vested under the 2016 LTIP.
(2)
Represents the weighted-average exercise price of the outstanding stock options.
In approving the Plan Amendment, the Board of Directors also considered the following factors:
•
Plan Importance: Equity grants under the 2016 LTIP are critical to the Company’s success and continued growth because they directly align employee interests with those of the stockholders and create a culture of ownership. They are key to increasing the Company’s ability to attract, reward and motivate top talent needed to achieve and exceed the Company’s strategic and continued growth objectives. They also promote retention of top talent, as equity awards are subject to multi-year and time-based vesting and/or performance-based criteria. The labor market in which we compete for talent includes many government contractors and entities that are much larger in size and scope than Telos and who can offer higher compensation packages to their employees. Our ability to make equity grants to our employees helps to offset that disadvantage.
•
Plan Participation: Awards are issued on a broad basis that includes our Board of Directors, our executive officers and leadership team, and our broader workforce. Approximately 58% of our current employees have been granted equity awards under the 2016 LTIP.
•
Share Repurchases: The Company’s share repurchases under its share repurchase program offset the dilutive impacts of equity awards granted under the 2016 LTIP. On May 24, 2022, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program for the repurchase of up to $50 million of our outstanding shares of Common Stock. Pursuant to this authorization, the Company may purchase shares of its common stock on a discretionary basis from time to time through open market purchases. The repurchase program has no expiration date and may be modified, suspended, or terminated at any time. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had repurchased 1,550,162 shares and still has approximately $38.7 million available under the stock repurchase program. No shares were repurchased in 2024. Since the inception of the share repurchase program, the Company has returned over $11.3 million in capital to stockholders. The shares repurchased are not returned to the pool of shares available for issuance under the 2016 LTIP.
•
Favorable Plan Features: The 2016 Plan includes several features that are consistent with the interests of our stockholders and sound corporate governance practices.
○
No automatic share replenishment or “evergreen” provision: Shares are not automatically replenished.
○
No discounted pricing of options or stock appreciation rights (“SARs”): Stock options and SARs may not be granted with an exercise price or measurement price lower than the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant.
16

TABLE OF CONTENTS

○
No liberal share counting or “recycling” of shares: Shares repurchased by the Company or withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations are not available for issuance under the 2016 Plan.
○
No liberal change in control definition: Change in control benefits are triggered only by the occurrence, rather than by stockholder approval, of a merger or other change in control event.
•
Potential Non-Favorable Strategic Actions: If the Plan Amendment is not approved, the Company will have to pursue multiple courses of less favorable strategic action. The Company will reassess current hiring practices and scale back equity awards for current employees, which can lead to less growth and higher turnover and related costs. Incentive awards only payable in cash tend to be less desirable for current employees and new hires resulting in discontent and frustration for our existing employees. Further, the Company will be less competitive in attracting top talent. Increasing cash awards will also reduce our cash position that could otherwise be used for future growth opportunities.
Summary of 2016 LTIP
The 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan was originally adopted by the Board of Directors on August 12, 2016, and it authorized 4,500,000 shares to be available for issuance. At the October 26, 2020 Special Meeting of Common Stockholders, the stockholders approved Amendment No. 1 to the 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, which increased the total number of available shares to 9,400,000 (inclusive of 1,007,742 shares that were available at the time of Amendment No. 1 but not awarded under the 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan). After our IPO on November 18, 2020, and the reverse stock split associated therewith, the total number of available shares under the 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan was converted to 7,459,913 shares of Common Stock. At the May 8, 2023 Annual Stockholder Meeting, the stockholders approved Amendment No. 2 to the 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, which increased the total number of available shares by 6,000,000. At the May 21, 2024 Annual Stockholders Meeting, the stockholders approved the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, which increased the available shares by another 8,500,000.
Purpose: The 2016 LTIP is intended to enhance the Company’s ability to attract and retain highly qualified directors, officers, key employees, and other persons and to motivate such persons to serve the Company and to improve the business results and earnings of the Company, by providing to such persons an opportunity to acquire or increase a direct proprietary interest in the operations and future success of the Company. To this end, the 2016 LTIP provides for the grant of stock options, share appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted share units, unrestricted shares and dividend equivalent rights (each, an “Award”).
The following summary of the material features of the 2016 LTIP is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the 2016 LTIP filed as Exhibit 10.9 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 and the draft of the Plan Amendment attached as Exhibit A to the Proxy Statement.
Administration: The 2016 LTIP is administered by the Board of Directors which has delegated to the Compensation Committee (“Administrator”) the responsibilities to administer, implement and operate the 2016 LTIP, and to grant and interpret the Awards.
Eligibility: An eligible individual includes any employee, officer, director, consultant, and advisor of the Company, and any other individual whose participation in the 2016 LTIP is determined by the Administrator to be in the best interests of the Company.
Duration of the Plan: The 2016 LTIP became effective as of August 12, 2016. No Award may be granted under the 2016 LTIP after September 30, 2030. Subject to other applicable provisions, any Award made under the 2016 LTIP before termination of the 2016 LTIP remains in effect until the Award has been satisfied or terminated in accordance with the 2016 LTIP and the terms of the Award.
Forfeiture: The Award Agreement (defined below) specifies the conditions under which a participant may forfeit an Award. In general, an unvested Award is forfeited when the participant’s full-time employment or other service relationship with the Company is terminated, and the period within which one may exercise a vested Award following termination is limited. An Award Agreement may provide that an Award terminates in its entirety, regardless of whether the Award is vested in whole or part, if the participant’s employment or other service relationship with the Company is terminated for “cause.” In addition, if the participant is an executive officer of the Company (or former executive officer), our Clawback Policy and certain federal laws may apply which could require the Company to recoup amounts received under an Award under certain circumstances.
17

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Types of Awards: The 2016 LTIP permits the grant of Options, Share Appreciation Rights, Restricted Shares, Restricted Share Units, Unrestricted Shares or Dividend Equivalent Rights. The Award Agreement between the Company and the participant sets forth the terms and conditions of the Award.
•
Options: The Award Agreement provides the type of Option (non-qualified stock option (“NSO”) or incentive stock option (“ISO”)) awarded, the number of Options, the purchase price per share (also referred to as the “exercise price”), the term of the Option, and other conditions as the Administrator may determine. Any eligible individual may be granted a NSO and the maximum term is ten years from the grant date, although the Award Agreement may specify a shorter term. An NSO must have a purchase price at least equal to the fair market value of the underlying share on the grant date. The 2016 LTIP generally defines “fair market value” to mean the official closing price per share on the relevant date. An ISO may be granted only to employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. The purchase price must be at least equal to the fair market value of the underlying share on the grant date (or 110% of the fair market value if granted to someone who owns more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of shares of the Company). An ISO grant is also limited by the following general restrictions: (i) an ISO must be granted within ten years of the 2016 LTIP’s adoption by the Board; (ii) the term of an ISO cannot exceed ten years (five years if granted to a 10%+ Stockholder); (iii) the total fair market value (determined as of the grant date) of shares for which all ISOs first become exercisable by an individual in any calendar year under this 2016 LTIP or any other plan may not exceed $100,000 or any other amount as may be permitted from time to time under Code Section 422; (iv) an ISO cannot be granted in tandem with an NSO in a manner that the exercise of one affects the right to exercise the other; and (v) an Option generally ceases to be treated as an ISO for tax purposes three months after the participant ceases to be an employee of the Company even if the terms of the Award Agreement specify that the Option remains exercisable beyond this three-month period. Upon vesting, the Option can be exercised by providing a written notice to the Company. The period during which an Option can be exercised is limited and may terminate when certain events occur, such as termination of employment or other service relationship with the Company. Shares purchased upon exercising the Option must be paid in full at the time of purchase plus amounts, if any, of federal and/or other taxes which the Company may be required to withhold with respect to the award. The purchase price may be paid (i) in cash or a cash-equivalent, (ii) by tendering or having withheld shares that have a total fair market value equal to the purchase price, (iii) by a broker-assisted cashless exercise procedure, (iv) by a combination of the foregoing methods, or (v) by any other means that the Administrator approves. If authorized under the Award Agreement, a participant may transfer, not for value, all or part of an NSO to a family member. No other Award is transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. Unless otherwise determined by the Administrator in accordance with the provisions of the immediately preceding sentence, an Award may be exercised during the lifetime of the awardee or, during the period under a legal disability, by the guardian or legal representative.
•
Share Appreciation Rights (“SAR”): In general, a SAR entitles the participant to receive a payment upon exercise equal to (1) the excess of (a) the fair market value on the exercise date of one share over (b) the grant price per share specified in the Award Agreement, times (2) the number of shares for which the SAR is being exercised. The grant price per share of a SAR cannot be less than the lower of the fair market value of the underlying share on the grant date or the exercise price of any tandem Option to which the SAR relates. The Administrator determines whether to pay the amount due upon exercise of the SARs in cash, by delivery of shares, or by a combination of the two. If any portion of the payment is made in shares, the Administrator determines the number of shares by dividing the portion of the payment amount by the fair market value of a share on the exercise date. No fractional Shares to settle a SAR will be issued. The Administrator determines whether to pay cash in lieu of any fractional shares or whether to cancel fractional shares without payment.
•
Share Award: The Administrator may grant an Award of restricted or unrestricted shares. The Administrator determines whether to pay the share award in cash, by delivery of shares, or by a combination of the two. For restricted shares, the Award Agreement specifies the restrictions, their duration, and events that would cause a forfeiture
•
Restricted Share Units: A restricted share unit granted is credited to a bookkeeping reserve account solely for accounting purposes, and represents a right to receive, on a date specified in the Award Agreement or the “settlement date”, one share or cash in an amount equal to the value of one share. To settle a restricted
18

TABLE OF CONTENTS

share unit, the Administrator determines whether to pay in cash, by delivery of shares, or by a combination of the two. Except as otherwise provided in the Award Agreement, participants have no rights of a stockholder for the share represented by a restricted share unit until the date the shares are issued.
•
Dividend Equivalent Rights: A dividend equivalent is the payment of an amount with respect to the restricted share units equal to the amount of dividends one would receive if one owned the underlying shares. If an Award Agreement provides that dividend equivalents are payable with respect to restricted share units, such dividend equivalents may be paid in any of the following ways: (1) in cash at the same time the cash dividends are paid to stockholders; (2) held in an account and paid in cash upon settlement of the restricted share units to which such dividend equivalents relate; or (3) in additional restricted share units. If additional restricted share units are paid with respect to cash dividends, the number of additional restricted share units to be granted will equal: (i) the product of (x) the per-share cash dividend, multiplied by (y) the total number of restricted share units which have not been settled or forfeited as of the record date for such dividend, divided by (ii) the fair market value of one share on the payment date of such dividend. Any dividend equivalents that are not paid in cash at the same time cash dividends are paid to stockholders shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as the restricted share units to which the dividend equivalents relate.
Available Shares: The total number of shares reserved for grants of Awards is 1,097,646 shares (the “Share Reserve”) as of the Record Date. Shares revert back to the Share Reserve and again become available for issuance if any shares covered by an Award are not issued or are forfeited, or if an Award otherwise terminates without delivery of shares. Shares issuable under the 2016 LTIP are shares of authorized but unissued Common Stock. At all times during the term of the 2016 LTIP and while any Awards are outstanding, the Company is required to retain as authorized and unissued shares at least the number of shares required to fulfill its obligations under the Awards, or otherwise assure itself of its ability to perform its obligations under the Awards. No fees, commissions, or charges are payable for the issuance of any shares.
Award Agreement: An award is evidenced by a written award agreement (“Award Agreement”). Nothing in the 2016 LTIP or in any Award or Award Agreement interferes with or limits in any way the Company’s right to terminate a participant’s employment or service at any time, with or without cause or notice, and whether or not the termination results in the failure of any portion of an Award to vest or any other adverse effect on the participant’s interests under the 2016 LTIP. In addition, nothing in the 2016 LTIP confers any right to continued employment or service with the Company. The grant of an Award is a one-time benefit that does not create any contractual or other right to receive future Awards or compensation in lieu of Awards, even if granted Awards repeatedly in the past. All determinations with respect to any future Awards and the terms of those Awards are at the sole discretion of the Administrator. Any vesting of Awards ceases upon termination of employment or other service relationship with the Company, or the transfer of employment or service from the Company, or other cessation of eligibility for any reason, except as may otherwise be explicitly provided in an Award Agreement. The Company does not guarantee any future value of any Award. No claim or entitlement to compensation or damages arises if the value of Awards decreases or do not increase.
Summary of Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences: The following is a summary of material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the 2016 LTIP under current U.S. federal income tax law. This summary deals with the general tax principles applicable to the 2016 LTIP and is based on laws, regulations, rulings and decisions currently in effect, all of which are subject to change. This summary does not address foreign, state and local tax laws or employment, estate and gift tax considerations because they may vary depending on individual circumstances and from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
•
Nonqualified Stock Option (NSO): There are no immediate U.S. federal income tax consequences of receiving an award of NSO under the 2016 LTIP. Upon exercise of the option, the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the shares subject to the option on the exercise date will constitute ordinary income taxable to the participant. Upon the participant’s disposition of shares acquired upon exercise, any gain realized in excess of the amount reported as ordinary income will be reportable by the participant as a capital gain, and any loss will be reportable as a capital loss. The capital gain or loss will be long-term if the participant held the share for more than one year. Otherwise, the capital gain or loss will be short-term.
19

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•
Incentive Stock Option (ISO): There are no immediate U.S. federal income tax consequences of receiving an award of ISO under the 2016 LTIP. Although a participant generally will not recognize taxable income upon the exercise of an ISO, the participant’s alternative minimum taxable income will be increased by the amount by which the aggregate fair market value of the shares underlying the option, which is generally determined as of the exercise date, exceeds the aggregate exercise price. Further, except in the case of the participant’s death or disability, if any option is exercised more than three months after the participant’s termination of employment, the option will cease to be treated as an ISO and will be subject to taxation under the rules applicable to NSO. If the participant sells the shares acquired upon exercise of any ISO at least two years after the dates on which the ISO was granted and at least one year after the date on which the ISO was exercised, any excess of the sale price of the option shares over the exercise price will be treated as long-term capital gain taxable to the option holder at the time of the sale. If the disposition occurs before the completion of the two-year and one-year periods, the excess of the fair market value of the option shares on the disposition date over the exercise price will be taxable income to the option holder at the time of the disposition. Of that income, the amount up to the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time the option was exercised over the exercise price will be ordinary income for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and the balance, if any, will be long-term or short-term capital gain, depending upon whether or not the shares were sold more than one year after the option was exercised. The Company will not be entitled to a business expense deduction with respect to any ISO unless the participant engages in a disqualifying disposition, at which time the Company will be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of the ordinary income taxable to the participant.
•
Stock Appreciation Rights (SAR): There are no immediate U.S. federal income tax consequences of receiving an award of SAR under the Plan. Upon exercise of SAR, the distribution of shares of Common Stock or the cash payment in satisfaction of the SAR will be taxable as ordinary income when the distribution or payment is actually or constructively received by the participant. The amount taxable as ordinary income is the aggregate fair market value of the shares of Common Stock determined as of the dates they are received or, in the case of a cash award, the amount of the cash payment.
•
Restricted Share Award: Generally, a participant will not recognize any taxable income for U.S. federal income tax purpose in the year of the restricted stock award if the shares are nontransferable and subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. A participant, however, may elect under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) to recognize compensation income in the year of the award in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares on the award date, determined without regard to the restrictions. If a participant does not make a Section 83(b) election, the fair market value of the shares on the date on which the restrictions lapse will be treated as compensation income to the participant and will be taxable in the year in which the restriction lapse.
•
Restricted Share Units (RSU): There is no immediate U.S. federal income tax consequences of receiving an award of restricted share units. The value of the underlying Shares on the date that the RSU award vests is treated as wages for FICA (Social Security and Medicare) tax purposes on the vesting date, even if the award is settled on a later date. Generally, when a RSU award in cash and/or Shares settle, the participant recognizes ordinary income equal to the cash and the fair market value of the Shares received on the date of receipt. However, if the restricted share unit award provides that settlement of the Award may occur in a taxable year after the year in which the restrictions lapse (i.e., a RSU becomes vested), there is a possibility that the participant must recognize income for federal income tax purposes on each date that the Award becomes vested (notwithstanding its delayed settlement) unless the Award is designed to comply with the requirements of Code Section 409A regarding nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements. Although the Plan permits the Administrator to do so, the Company generally does not grant RSU awards that contain this delayed settlement feature.
•
Dividend Equivalent Rights: There is no immediate U.S. federal income tax consequences of receiving an award of dividend equivalent rights. A participant who receives the dividend equivalent right will recognize ordinary income on the date of payment in the amount distributed to the participant pursuant to the award
Modification or Termination of Plan: The Board may, at any time and from time to time, amend, suspend, or terminate the 2016 LTIP as to any Shares as to which Awards have not been made. An amendment is contingent on approval of the stockholders to the extent stated by the Board, required by applicable law, or required by applicable stock exchange listing requirements. No amendment, suspension, or termination of the 2016 LTIP will, without the consent of the affected participant or participants, impair rights or obligations under any Award then awarded under the 2016 LTIP.
20

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL 4: ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Board of Directors of Telos recommends the approval of the resolution set forth below approving the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.
The Company is providing the holders of the Common Stock a vote at the 2025 Annual Meeting to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table, and related tables and narrative disclosures as required under the rules and regulations of the SEC.
The say-on-pay vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, the Board of Directors, or the Compensation Committee. Our Board of Directors and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of the Company’s stockholders, will consider the results of the vote on this advisory resolution, and will evaluate whether any actions are warranted to address those results.
In our last advisory say-on-pay vote at the 2024 Annual Meeting, our stockholders approved the say-on-pay resolution presented at that time, with 95.4% of the votes cast in favor of the proposal. As is described in greater detail below, the Company made significant changes to its executive compensation program in 2024 (many of which were outlined in the Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting), emphasizing pay for performance by greatly increasing the percentage of executive compensation that is contingent on meeting stringent and critical performance criteria. In light of these changes and in the context of what it believes is a fair and responsible executive compensation program, the Board of Directors is asking the holders of the Company’s Common Stock to indicate their support for the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as described. This proposal gives the holders of the Common Stock the opportunity to express their views on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. This vote is not intended to address any specific aspect of compensation but rather the overall compensation of the Company’s named executive officers and the related philosophy, policies and practices as described. Accordingly, the Board of Directors is asking the holders of the Common Stock to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the 2025 Annual Meeting:
“RESOLVED, that the holders of the Company’s Common Stock approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in the Company’s Annual Proxy Statement, pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table, and the other related tables and disclosures.”
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) provides information regarding the fiscal 2024 compensation program for our Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”), including our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer, and three additional individuals who served as executive officers in 2024. For 2024, our NEOs whose compensation is discussed in this CD&A and shown in the executive compensation tables below were:
•
John B. Wood, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
•
Mark Bendza, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
•
Mark D. Griffin, Executive Vice President, Security Solutions
•
Hutch Robbins, Executive Vice President, General Counsel
•
Malcolm Cooke, Vice President, Chief Information Technology Officer
In this CD&A, we describe the material elements of our executive compensation philosophy and programs during 2024 and provide the key facts and reasoning behind our Compensation Committee’s decisions regarding the 2024 compensation of our NEOs.
Executive Summary
The Compensation Committee’s objective with respect to executive compensation for 2024 was to incentivize achievement of key business goals by aligning executive pay with business performance. To that end, the Committee significantly changed the total portion of executive compensation that was directly “at risk” by virtue of being entirely contingent upon achievement of such goals. Furthermore, the Committee selected rigorous metrics to
21

TABLE OF CONTENTS

measure goal achievement, for both short-term and long-term incentive compensation, focusing on metrics that would directly translate to increased shareholder value before providing a payout to our executive team.
For example, with the exception of his base salary, the entirety of CEO John Wood’s 2024 direct compensation was contingent on achieving objective Company performance metrics – both on an annual basis (as part of the Annual Inventive Plan), and on a long-term basis (through performance-based long-term incentives). Approximately ninety-seven percent (97%) of Mr. Wood’s maximum direct compensation1 for 2024 was contingent on meeting objective Company performance metrics, thereby directly aligning his interests with those of our stockholders and paying almost exclusively for performance.
 
A similar approach was adopted for NEO compensation. For Executive Vice President NEOs (Messrs. Griffin, Bendza and Robbins), from approximately eighty-one percent (81%) to eighty-three percent (83%) of their maximum direct compensation for 2024 was entirely contingent on achieving objective Company performance metrics.
The rationale for the Company’s increased emphasis on tying executive pay to Company performance in 2024 originated with the failure of the Company’s say-on-pay proposal at its 2023 Annual Meeting. Following that meeting, the Company engaged with certain stockholders willing to share their insights and opinions on executive compensation, as discussed in depth in the Company’s 2024 Proxy Statement. That engagement resulted in the following feedback, demonstrating that stockholders wanted to see:
•
A compensation structure that incentivizes greater total stockholder return;
•
Alignment of incentive compensation with stockholder interests;
•
Compensation focused on improved cash flow and meaningful revenue generation; and
•
An increase in the use of meaningful performance-based metrics in long-term incentive compensation.
1
Calculated as if all performance goals were achieved and the NEO received the maximum number of shares granted to him. These shares were valued at the reported share price on the grant date.
22

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Accordingly, when designing executive incentive compensation for 2024, the Compensation Committee selected business goals that were critical drivers for Company success and that responded to stockholder feedback. For the annual incentive compensation or bonus (which we call the Annual Incentive Plan or “AIP”), the Committee focused on i) annual revenue, ii) finalizing a significant contract that we expect will generate meaningful revenue for the next five years, and iii) continued, successful expansion of the Company’s critical TSA PreCheck program, as follows:
 
 
 
 
2024 Annual Incentive Plan Performance Metrics
 
 
Metric
 
 
Rationale
 
 
2024 Company total revenue
 
 
To incentivize Company growth
 
 
Finalization of the Company’s subcontract for the DMDC Program
 
 
To incentivize successful finalization of a significant contract that we expect will generate meaningful revenue for the next five years
 
 
Expansion of the Company’s TSA PreCheck enrollment sites to 125 locations
 
 
To incentivize growth and revenue generation from the Company’s critical TSA PreCheck program
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
With respect to long-term incentive compensation, the Committee focused on i) expansion of TSA PreCheck enrollment sites beyond 2024 and through 2026, ii) 2025 Company free cash flow2, and iii) maintaining the Company’s stock price at or above certain performance levels for no less than 50 consecutive days, as follows:
 
 
 
 
2024 Long-Term Incentive Grants Performance Metrics
 
 
Metric
 
 
Rationale
 
 
2025 Company free cash flow
 
 
To incentivize Company cash generation
 
 
Expansion of the Company’s TSA PreCheck enrollment sites to 500 locations prior to January 1, 2027
 
 
To incentivize growth and revenue generation from the Company’s critical TSA PreCheck program
 
 
Maintain the price of Telos stock (TLS) at or above certain performance levels ($6, $8, $10, $12) for no less than 50 consecutive days each, prior to January 1, 2027
 
 
To incentivize an increase in shareholder value and align executive and shareholder interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The importance to Telos of achieving the goals reflected in these long-term incentive grants – particularly the grants contingent on sustained increases in the price of Telos stock – is demonstrated by the value of the grants made. As is explained in greater detail below, the Committee set base vesting targets for these grants at levels that would show sufficient improvement in Company performance (and a resultant increase in enterprise value) to warrant RSU payouts consistent with historical target long-term incentive compensation amounts. Additionally, the Committee sought to push Company executives to reach stretch goals – especially as to sustained stock price increases before 2027 – by making grants at historically high values that would vest if, and only if, dramatic year-over-year performance goals were met.
The consequence of the Committee’s approach to 2024 long-term incentive compensation are performance-based grants that, when viewed at grant date maximum value, appear significantly higher than both Company history and comparable compensation among peers, but that are predicated upon highly rigorous and aggressive goals. Eschewing a compensation approach that incorporated performance-based compensation as one equal element of an executive’s compensation package, the Committee placed extraordinary emphasis on performance-based compensation. Likewise, instead of rewarding incremental success in long-term performance, the Committee sought to reward extraordinary performance through larger incentives.
Compensation Philosophy, Objectives and Processes
The Compensation Committee is primarily responsible for the development and execution of, and adherence to, our compensation philosophy. Our compensation program is designed to fully align with and support the achievement of our business and financial goals, to be competitive in the intense market for talent in which we compete, and to conform our compensation plan generally to plans typically utilized by companies in our peer group and industry. We
2
Free cash flow is a non-GAAP measure defined for these purposes as net cash (used in) provided by operating activities, less net purchases of property and equipment, and capitalized software development costs, adjusted for any Annual Incentive Plan, Long-Term Incentive Plan, or 401(k) match payments that the Compensation Committee elects to pay in cash instead of stock.
23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

are a high-performance, results-driven organization made up of talented people. In general, our compensation system is designed to engage, motivate and challenge our employees to continuously develop to meet their full potential, to align their individual efforts to our business and strategic objectives, and to reward our employees for contributions to the achievement of those objectives. More specifically, the primary objectives of the compensation program are:
•
To attract, motivate, engage and retain highly talented and results-oriented key employees;
•
To secure the future performance of services of those employees;
•
To encourage key employees to put forth maximum efforts for both our short-term and long-term success;
•
To drive achievement of our long-term growth, profitability and other objectives;
•
To reward performance; and
•
To drive increased stockholder value.
The individual components of the 2024 compensation program — consisting of base salary, annual incentive compensation (AIP), equity incentive compensation (called a Long-Term Incentive or “LTI”), and perquisites — are designed to meet these objectives and together are intended to be competitive in the marketplace. The overall compensation package is based on the following considerations:
•
Compensation should consist of a combination of fixed and at-risk compensation, with the at-risk compensation constituting a majority of the total compensation for at least our NEOs, in order to encourage improved annual and long-term performance.
•
Compensation should be a mix of annual and long-term compensation. Ideally, long-term compensation for at least our NEOs will constitute a majority of the total compensation, in order to encourage retention and attainment of long-term performance goals.
•
Compensation should be a mix of cash and equity, with cash typically rewarding achievement of goals and equity encouraging retention and long-term performance aligned with the interests of our stockholders.
•
Additionally, the Compensation Committee continues to believe that equity ownership by the management team aligns the interests of management with our long-term corporate performance intended to drive and enhance stockholder value.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
What we DO
 
 
What we DON’T do
 
 
Align annual bonuses with a minimum threshold level of achievement for funding and objective and challenging performance measures.
 
 
No “golden parachute” gross-ups.
 
 
Ensure that the majority of executive target compensation is equity-based, thereby aligning executives’ interests with stockholders’ interests.
 
 
No guaranteed bonuses or base salary increases for executive officers.
 
 
Maintain a significant portion of total executive compensation directly “at risk” because it is contingent on meeting Company performance targets.
 
 
No options or SARs granted below fair market value.
 
 
Maintain a Compensation Committee comprised solely of independent directors.
 
 
No repricing of stock options without stockholder approval.
 
 
Review executive compensation strategy, competitiveness, and risk against a peer group, annually.
 
 
No excessive severance.
 
 
Retain an independent compensation consultant to provide expert advice on the design and evaluation of our compensation policies and practices.
 
 
No excessive perquisites.
 
 
Maintain a Clawback Policy.
 
 
No executive retirement plans other than those offered to all employees.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
24

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Mr. John Wood is not present during the voting or deliberation on his individual compensation. Except as set forth below in the description of the AIP, Mr. Wood recommends to the Compensation Committee the compensation for the named executive officers. The Compensation Committee reviews these recommendations and, following discussions with Mr. Wood, determines the appropriate compensation for those executives.
Statement Concerning the Timing of Stock Option Grants
Our 2016 LTIP provides the Compensation Committee with the discretion to issue stock options, but the Company does not have a policy concerning the timing of stock option grants. The 2016 LTIP does prohibit the back-dating of options. The Company did not issue any stock options in 2024, and has no specific practice concerning the timing thereof; however, the Company does not time the disclosure of material nonpublic information to affect the value of executive compensation.
Compensation Committee Processes
The Compensation Committee reviews the base salary levels, annual short-term incentive opportunities, and long-term incentive compensation opportunities of our NEOs and all related performance criteria in the first quarter of each year, or more frequently as warranted.
In making decisions about the compensation of our NEOs, the Compensation Committee relies primarily on the general experience of its members and subjective considerations of various factors, including as warranted the following:
•
Our executive compensation program objectives;
•
Our performance against the financial, operational, and strategic objectives established by the Compensation Committee and our Board;
•
Each individual NEO’s knowledge, skills, experience, qualifications, and tenure relative to other similarly-situated executives at the companies in our compensation peer group;
•
The scope of each NEO’s role and responsibilities compared to other similarly-situated executives at the companies in our compensation peer group;
•
The performance of each individual NEO, based on a subjective assessment of their contributions to our overall performance, ability to lead their business unit or function, and work as part of a team;
•
The potential of each individual executive officer to contribute to our long-term financial, operational, and strategic objectives;
•
Our CEO’s compensation relative to that of our NEOs, and pay equity among our NEOs;
•
Our financial performance relative to our compensation and performance peers;
•
The compensation practices of our compensation peer group and the positioning of each NEO’s compensation in a ranking of compensation levels based on an analysis of competitive market data;
•
The feedback received from our stockholders and the results of our annual say-on-pay advisory votes of our stockholders; and
•
The recommendations of our CEO with respect to the compensation of our other NEOs.
These factors provide the framework for compensation decision-making and final decisions regarding the compensation opportunity for each NEO. No single factor is determinative in setting compensation levels, nor is the impact of any individual factor on the determination of pay levels quantifiable.
The Compensation Committee does not weigh these factors in any predetermined manner, nor does it apply any formulas in developing its compensation recommendations. The members of the Compensation Committee consider all of this information in light of their individual experience, knowledge of the Company, knowledge of the competitive market, knowledge of each NEO, and business judgment in making their recommendations.
Risk Mitigating Features of Compensation
The Compensation Committee also considers the potential risks in our business when designing and administering our executive compensation program, and we believe our balanced approach to performance measurement and compensation works to avoid misaligned incentives for individuals to undertake excessive or inappropriate risk.
Role of the Compensation Consultant
In September 2024, the Compensation Committee terminated its relationship with Lockton as an independent executive and director compensation advisor, and subsequently engaged Zayla Partners (“Zayla”) to perform such
25

TABLE OF CONTENTS

services. The Compensation Committee has direct access to its compensation consultant and control over its engagement, although our executive management, at the direction of the Compensation Committee, interacts with the compensation consultant for the purpose of facilitating the flow of information between the Compensation Committee and the compensation consultant and assisting the Compensation Committee in its work. More specifically, the compensation consultant will assist the Compensation Committee by:
•
Attending Compensation Committee meetings, with and without management present, for compensation strategy development;
•
Providing annual peer group development, and review and advise on proposed executive compensation and awards and plan designs;
•
Providing annual proxy study of named executive officers and independent director pay practices;
•
Providing equity plan recommendations and annual and long-term incentive plan reviews; and
•
Providing periodic share dilution and shareholder transfer value analysis.
The Compensation Committee has determined that the work of Lockton and Zayla and their employees as compensation consultants to the Compensation Committee has not created any conflict of interest. While the data and input provided by the compensation consultant is a factor in its analysis of various compensation elements and has been relied upon by the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee makes the final determination on all compensation decisions.
Competitive Positioning
For purposes of assessing our executive compensation against the compensation market, the Compensation Committee reviews and considers the compensation levels and practices of a select group of peer companies. In the first quarter of 2024, the Compensation Committee refreshed the group of peer companies. Three companies in the Company’s 2022 peer group were no longer public companies, and the Committee felt that the four largest companies (by revenue) in the peer group (CrowdStrike, Okta, Zscaler, and Perficient) were too large to serve as comparable companies. In assessing potential peers, the Committee considered the nature of a potential peer’s business and industry, its size by revenue, its history as a public company, number of employees, market capitalization, net income, the market from which it competes for employee talent, and its “connection strength” – the extent and/or number of interrelationships between peers and peers of peers (e.g., whether a company was a peer of a peer company, or selected the Company as a peer.) To that end, the Committee benefitted from resources and recommendations from Lockton and Equilar, Inc., a provider of executive compensation benchmarking services. The Compensation Committee was particularly mindful that the Company generally competes for employee talent and business with companies that are much larger – by headcount, revenue, and assets – than Telos.
After due consideration, the Compensation Committee selected the following companies to serve as a compensation benchmark peer group for 2024:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pre-Existing and Remaining
 
 
New in 2024
 
 
Removed
Rapid7, Inc.
Tenable Holdings, Inc.
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
Qualys, Inc.
Varonis Systems, Inc.
OneSpan, Inc.
 
 
SecureWorks Corp.
PagerDuty, Inc.
A10 Networks, Inc
PROS Holdings, Inc.
Model N, Inc.
Brightcove Inc.
Agilysys, Inc.
Veritone, Inc.
Mitek Systems, Inc.
 
 
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
Okta, Inc.
Zscaler, Inc.
Perficient, Inc.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Elements of Compensation
Base Salary
We provide each of our executive officers with a base salary to compensate them for services rendered during the fiscal year. The relative levels of base salary are designed to reflect each executive officer’s professional expertise and scope of responsibility and accountability within the Company, our financial performance, and the executive officer’s individual performance. Base salaries generally are established at levels sufficient to attract and retain an
26

TABLE OF CONTENTS

effective management team when considered together with the performance-based components of our overall compensation program. Generally, we establish the initial base salaries of our NEOs through arm’s-length negotiation at the time we hire the individual, taking into account their position, qualifications, experience, salary expectations, and the base salaries of our other NEOs. Thereafter, the Compensation Committee reviews the base salaries of our NEOs each year as part of its annual compensation review, with input from Mr. Wood (except with respect to his own base salary) and makes adjustments as it determines to be reasonable and necessary to reflect the scope of a NEO’s performance, individual contributions and responsibilities, position in the case of a promotion, and market conditions. For 2024, after considering the base salaries of peer executives and in light of the various factors described above, the Compensation Committee did not believe an adjustment to base salaries was warranted. The base salaries of our NEOs who have held that designation since 2022 have remained flat since 2022. The 2024 annual base salaries of the NEOs were:
 
 
 
 
Executive Officer
 
 
Base Salary
John B. Wood
 
 
$600,000
Mark Bendza
 
 
$410,000
Mark D. Griffin
 
 
$395,000
Hutch Robbins
 
 
$385,000
Malcolm Cooke
 
 
$260,280
 
 
 
 
Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”)
Under the AIP, the NEOs are eligible for incentive bonus awards. The purpose of the AIP is to provide each of our NEOs the opportunity annually to earn a bonus award as an incentive to put forth maximum efforts for both our short-term and long-term success and to drive achievement of our growth and profitability objectives. The AIP is based upon one or more financial or operational performance targets as determined by the Compensation Committee on an annual basis. Awards under the AIP are an integral component of compensation that link and reinforce executive decision-making and performance with the annual objectives of the Company. The AIP is administered by the Compensation Committee and determinations by the Compensation Committee are final, conclusive and binding on all parties. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to determine the appropriate performance targets, the amount of the awards, and the any leverage features. The amount of the awards, performance targets, and leverage features generally are established in writing during the first quarter of each year. The AIP and the annual incentives potentially payable under it for our NEOs are generally competitive with similar annual incentive compensation earned by senior executives at our peer companies, as evaluated by our compensation consultant and reported to the Compensation Committee.
For 2024, the Compensation Committee selected annual performance criteria that reflected the Company’s strategic goals to grow its revenue, to finalize a subcontract for a significant program that is expected to generate meaningful revenue and profit for the Company over the next five (5) years, and to expand the enrollment sites for the Company’s critical TSA PreCheck program. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to pay AIP in the form of stock, cash, or a combination thereof to optimize liquidity and share dilution in the best interest of stockholders.
To determine the amount of the potential bonus awards for 2024 AIP, the Compensation Committee created total dollar value pools for each element of the program (which pools encompassed not only NEO bonuses but senior management bonuses as well). The size of the pool for each element of the program roughly equated to the importance of the performance goal to be incentivized and the rigor of the metrics selected for that goal, with the largest pool allocated to 2024 Company revenue and the smallest to finalization of the subcontract for the DMDC program. Within each pool, the amount of any individual NEO’s potential bonus was determined using that individual’s proportion of total AIP based on total direct compensation amounts approved by the Committee.
•
Performance Criteria #1 – 2024 Company Revenue
The dollar values of the revenue performance levels in our 2024 AIP were directly related to the objectives contained in our 2024 budget and our long-term strategy. At the time the Committee finalized the 2024 AIP, the Company internally forecast annual revenue of approximately $135,000,000, contingent in significant part on whether a protest on a critical contract award would be resolved in favor of our prime partner, and, if so, when work under that contract would commence. The Committee therefore chose annual revenue of $135,000,000 as the target level to earn a payout for this element of the AIP; revenue of less than that amount would not result in payment. To incentivize AIP
27

TABLE OF CONTENTS

participants to drive the Company to earn greater revenue, the Committee selected annual revenue of $150,000,000 as an additional, higher performance level. Awards corresponding to actual revenues between $135,000,000 and $150,000,000 would be paid out using a straight-line interpolation.
 
 
 
 
2024 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN (2024 Company Revenue)
 
 
Executive
 
 
Revenue Performance Level and
Associated Payout Values(1)
 
 
Actual 2024
Revenue
 
 
2024 Payment
 
 
 
 
 
≥ $135,000,000
 
 
≥$150,000,000
 
 
$108,272,000
 
 
 
 
 
John B. Wood
 
 
$197,000
 
 
$329,000
 
 
 
 
 
$0
 
 
Mark Bendza
 
 
$101,000
 
 
$168,000
 
 
 
 
 
$0
 
 
Mark D. Griffin
 
 
$97,000
 
 
$162,000
 
 
 
 
 
$0
 
 
Hutch Robbins
 
 
$95,000
 
 
$158,000
 
 
 
 
 
$0
 
 
Malcolm Cooke
 
 
$30,000
 
 
$49,000
 
 
 
 
 
$0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
Payout dollar values rounded to the nearest thousand.
Actual 2024 Company revenue was $108,272,000, below the $135,000,000 target for a payment and, therefore, no payments were made under this component of 2024 AIP.
•
Performance Criteria #2 – Finalized Subcontract for DMDC Program
On or about March 15, 2024, the Company announced that its prime partner had won a contract for a five (5) year program that was estimated to be worth up to several hundred million dollars to Telos, as a subcontractor, over the course of its duration, and that the contract award was subject to a customary post-award protest period provided by the federal government. (Telos later announced that the contract related to a program for the U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Manpower Data Center (“DMDC”).) Resolving the protest favorably, and securing the subcontract for this program, was of critical, long-term strategic importance to the Company, given that the Company estimated that this program would generate significant revenue and profit over the next five years. Accordingly, to incentivize the success of this important endeavor, the Compensation Committee selected the finalization of the DMDC program subcontract as an operational goal for the 2024 AIP. The Committee indicated that the bonuses predicated on meeting this goal would be paid upon accomplishment of the goal, as determined by the Committee.
On August 28, 2024, the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) publicly disclosed that the protester on the DMDC contract award had withdrawn its protest. Telos subsequently entered into a subcontract for performance under the DMDC program, and the Compensation Committee determined that this performance criteria for the 2024 AIP had been met effective September 25, 2024, and authorized payments to the recipients accordingly.
 
 
 
 
2024 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN (DMDC Program Subcontract)(1)
 
 
Executive
 
 
Payout Value Upon Performance
 
 
2024 Payment
 
 
John B. Wood
 
 
$66,000
 
 
$66,000
 
 
Mark Bendza
 
 
$34,000
 
 
$34,000
 
 
Mark D. Griffin
 
 
$32,000
 
 
$32,000
 
 
Hutch Robbins
 
 
$32,000
 
 
$32,000
 
 
Malcolm Cooke
 
 
$10,000
 
 
$10,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
Dollar values rounded to the nearest thousand.
•
Performance Criteria #3 – Expansion to 125 TSA PreCheck Enrollment Sites
The Company prioritized expansion of its TSA PreCheck enrollment and renewal services as a growth driver for 2024. PreCheck enrollment is done onsite at a physical location, and to expand its enrollment fee revenue the Company needs to expand the number of locations nationwide where customers can physically enroll in TSA PreCheck through Telos. Quicker expansion (while adhering to TSA’s security requirements and maintaining customer satisfaction) will lead to expedited revenue growth. The Company began 2024 with 25 enrollment locations and the expectation to eventually reach 500 locations nationwide. To incentivize rapid and successful expansion in 2024, the Compensation Committee set a performance goal of reaching 125 open and operational enrollment sites
28

TABLE OF CONTENTS

within the calendar year as a component of 2024 AIP. The Committee indicated that the bonuses predicated on meeting this goal would be paid upon accomplishment of the goal, as determined by the Committee.
The Compensation Committee determined that this performance criteria for the 2024 AIP had been met effective September 20, 2024, when the Company opened its 125th PreCheck enrollment site, and authorized payments to the recipients accordingly.
 
 
 
 
2024 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN (Expansion to 125 PreCheck Enrollment Sites)(1)
 
 
Executive
 
 
Payout Value Upon Performance
 
 
2024 Payment
 
 
John B. Wood
 
 
$131,000
 
 
$131,000
 
 
Mark Bendza
 
 
$67,000
 
 
$67,000
 
 
Mark D. Griffin
 
 
$65,000
 
 
$65,000
 
 
Hutch Robbins
 
 
$63,000
 
 
$63,000
 
 
Malcolm Cooke
 
 
$20,000
 
 
$20,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
Dollar values rounded to the nearest thousand
The total amounts of potential AIP payments at target value (using the $135 million revenue performance level as target for the 2024 revenue component of AIP) equaled roughly 66% of base salary for Mr. Wood, approximately 49% of base salary for the Executive VP NEOs, and approximately 23% of base salary for Mr. Cooke – all below the twenty-fifth percentile for peers in the Company’s compensation peer group. The total actual AIP payment that the NEOs received for 2024 are as follows:
 
 
 
 
Named Executive Officer
 
 
AIP Award
John B. Wood
 
 
$197,118
Mark Bendza
 
 
101,023
Mark D. Griffin
 
 
97,327
Hutch Robbins
 
 
94,863
Malcolm Cooke
 
 
29,568
 
 
 
 
The Committee further elected to pay such bonuses in cash in part to eliminate any impact of the 2024 AIP awards on share count dilution.
Other senior staff members were eligible to participate in the AIP in 2024, and the total amount available for such incentives was approved by the Compensation Committee. Senior staff performance goals are set by management, based on performance of their business segment or the Company as a whole or a combination of both. For 2024, any award payout was paid in cash.
Long-Term Incentive Plan
The purpose of the 2016 LTIP is to enhance our ability to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified employees, to improve our business results and earnings by providing such persons an opportunity to acquire or increase a direct proprietary interest through ownership of equity in the operations and future success of the Company, and to align the employees’ interests and efforts with the interests of our stockholders. The 2016 LTIP allows for the award of a number of types of equity or equity-based incentives, including stock options, restricted shares, and restricted share units, among others, and the incentives can be structured to be either time-based or performance-based. Time-based incentives encourage retention and provide for incremental recognition of equity compensation over the vesting period. Performance-based incentives allow for additional awards based on over-achievement, while also withholding compensation for under-performance, of defined objective performance criteria. Performance-based restricted share units (“PSUs”), if the performance criteria are satisfied while the executive or senior officer continues in service, would settle in our Common Stock.
The Compensation Committee decides what form of incentive to use on a grant-by-grant basis, depending on the circumstances. When approving an incentive for an executive or senior officer, the Compensation Committee considers the executive or senior officer’s current role and contribution to the Company, the anticipated role and contribution of the executive or senior officer to the Company’s long-term financial and performance goals, the executive or senior officer’s performance and achievements, and the industry practices and norms as evidenced by our peer group of companies. The
29

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Compensation Committee also takes into account the number of long-term incentives granted in prior years, existing levels of stock ownership by executive or senior officers, and the aggregate grants of incentives to all executive or senior officers. The Compensation Committee also considers the other elements of incentive compensation available to executive or senior officers and the performance metrics associated with those incentives, with a view toward providing an appropriately diverse set of performance criteria and objectives to incentivize both service to the Company over time as well as performance, and to avoid or minimize multiple forms of compensation for the same achievement. In general, the executive or senior officers with higher levels and amounts of responsibility are eligible to receive larger equity awards and have a larger proportion of their compensation paid in the form of equity as opposed to cash-based compensation. Finally, the Compensation Committee typically reviews proposed equity awards to executive or senior officers against benchmarking and peer group data and utilizes that data to ensure that the level of equity awards to our executive or senior officers generally are competitive and in alignment with our peer group companies and industry expectations. The 2016 LTIP and the grant award agreements issued under it also provide for clawback of equity awards to the extent permissible by law and the Company’s policy.
In 2023, the Compensation Committee made no LTI grants to NEOs, for several reasons. First, at the time the Committee was considering such awards during the first quarter of 2023, the 2016 LTIP lacked sufficient shares available to make incentive awards roughly in line with median peer compensation of a similar type. Second, the low prices of Telos’ shares in the latter portions of the first quarter of 2023 gave the Committee concern regarding the dilutive effect of awards made at that time. After the Company’s 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and the failure of the Company’s say-on-pay proposal, the Committee felt that it needed to first engage with stockholders concerning compensation structure and to revisit the issue of LTI for NEOs in 2024.
In the first quarter of 2024, the Compensation Committee met to address changes necessary to the Company’s executive compensation program with the benefit of what it had heard concerning that program from stockholders and third parties. In an effort to more fully align executive compensation with Company success, the Compensation Committee determined that NEO long-term incentive grants for 2024 would be primarily performance-based. Specifically, the percentage of performance-based grants in the NEOs’ long-term incentive compensation would increase from 0% in 2022 (the last year in which LTI grants were made to our NEOs) to 100% for the CEO, and approximately 85% for the other NEOs (at maximum value), in 2024.
 
Focusing on the long-term growth of the Company, the Compensation Committee selected the following performance-based metrics for long-term incentives to be issued in 2024:
•
Expansion of enrollment sites for Telos TSA PreCheck services to 250, 350 and then 500 sites prior to January 1, 2027
•
Positive free cash flow for the Company in 2025, with additional performance levels at $2 million, $6 million and $12 million
•
Meeting TLS share price targets of $6 a share, $8 a share, $10 a share and $12 a share for fifty consecutive days (each) prior to January 1, 2027
30

TABLE OF CONTENTS

These metrics tie directly into important Company goals: i) expanding TSA PreCheck enrollment sites, to drive greater revenue and profit from that valuable program; ii) improving free cash flow year over year, and generating cash, and iii) increasing, and maintaining an increase in, the share price of our Common Stock. Each of these performance goals aligns directly with stockholder interests.
Recognizing the retentive benefit of time-based equity grants, the Committee made time-based incentive grants to the NEOs (except the CEO) vesting one half in one year from grant date and one half two years from grant date. Although a two-year vest period is shorter than the Company’s typical preference for such grants (three years), the Committee felt the shorter period was warranted in light of the absence of any equity grants to executives in 2023.
•
PreCheck Site Expansion LTI Grants (“LTI PSU Grant #1”)
The stockholder feedback we received in the fall of 2023 emphasized aligning executive compensation with revenue generation. The TSA PreCheck program is one of the most significant revenue-generating programs for Telos – growing the number of PreCheck enrollments will grow overall company revenue. Emphasizing that revenue growth, the Compensation Committee sought to extend the incentives for enrollment site expansion created by the 2024 AIP through 2026 by making LTI grants of PSUs that would vest, in part, when the Company opened its 250th, 350th, and 500th enrollment site, provided those performance levels were met prior to January 1, 2027. The Committee did not consider using enrollment site expansion as a part of the 2024 AIP and as a long-term incentive to be duplicative or rewarding accomplishment of the same goals because of the difference of emphasis in each plan: the Committee sought to incentivize an immediate ramp in enrollment sites via the 2024 AIP, and sought to incentivize the longer term expansion of the enrollment site program (above and beyond the initial ramp) throughout the following two years via the long-term incentive grants.
 
 
 
 
LTI PSU GRANT #1 (in PSUs Vesting Per Performance Level)
 
 
Executive
 
 
250 Sites
 
 
350 Sites
 
 
500 Sites
 
 
Total Maximum
 
 
John B. Wood
 
 
114,808
 
 
172,212
 
 
229,616
 
 
516,636
 
 
Mark Bendza
 
 
57,331
 
 
85,997
 
 
114,663
 
 
257,991
 
 
Mark D. Griffin
 
 
45,094
 
 
67,642
 
 
90,189
 
 
202,925
 
 
Hutch Robbins
 
 
32,093
 
 
48,140
 
 
64,187
 
 
144,420
 
 
Malcolm Cooke
 
 
2,232
 
 
3,348
 
 
4,464
 
 
10,044
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The number of shares listed per performance level vests only upon, and at the time of, achievement of the level. For example, if, by the end of 2026, Telos has opened 425 enrollment sites, 287,020 PSUs would have vested for Mr. Wood (114,808 on the opening of the 250th site, and 172,212 on the opening of the 350th site).
•
2025 Free Cash Flow LTI Grants (“LTI PSU Grant #2”)
Consistent with stockholder feedback to focus executive compensation on improved cash flow and meaningful revenue generation, the Compensation Committee made long-term incentive grants contingent upon the Company’s revenue and free cash flow results for calendar (and fiscal) year 2025, as reported on the Company’s 2025 Form 10-K. The Committee selected a shorter performance period (one fiscal year of performance) than a typical long-term incentive award because of the importance to stockholders of returning the Company to revenue growth and positive free cash flow in 2025, after several years of declining year over year revenue and negative cash flow. Relying on the Company’s then-current long-range forecast for 2025, the Committee set the following performance levels for PSU vesting, with increasing numbers of PSUs vesting at the higher performance levels. Both the revenue and corresponding free cash flow goals would have to be met to constitute achievement of the overall performance level and to trigger vesting:
 
 
 
 
ORIGINAL LTI PSU GRANT #2
 
 
Performance Levels for Vesting
 
 
2025 Company Revenue
 
 
2025 Company Free Cash Flow
 
 
≥$180,000,000
 
 
≥$0
 
 
≥$200,000,000
 
 
≥$2,000,000
 
 
≥$200,000,000
 
 
≥$6,000,000
 
 
≥$200,000,000
 
 
≥$12,000,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
31

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Free Cash Flow for purposes of this award would be calculated the same as free cash flow reported in the Company’s publicly-filed financial statements, adjusted for any AIP, 2016 LTIP, or 401(k) match payments that the Compensation Committee elects to pay in cash in lieu of stock. For the target performance level, if revenue was equal to or greater than $180 million and less than $200 million and free cash flow was greater than zero and less than $2 million, the PSUs earned would be calculated on a straight-line interpolation with 50% weighting to revenue and 50% weighting to free cash flow. For the second performance level, if revenue was equal to or greater than $200 million and free cash flow was between $2 million and $6 million, the PSUs earned would be calculated on a straight-line interpolation, and the same would hold true for the third level if free cash flow was between $6 million and $12 million.
At the time of the grants in May 2024, the Company expected that a significant portion of its 2025 revenue would come from the DMDC program, and those expectations were reflected in the $180 million and $200 million revenue performance levels for the grants. The DMDC program began to transition from the incumbent contractor to Telos in the fourth quarter of 2024, and began to ramp up in earnest in early 2025, providing the Company greater insight into the requirements of the end user under the contract. The majority of revenue on the program is from the sale of third-party hardware and software products to Telos’ customer, and as the program began the Company learned that a significantly larger than expected proportion of the orders would be software orders. Hardware orders are recognized as gross revenue when the orders are filled. However, software orders are often recognized as gross revenue over a period of performance or as net revenue when the orders are filled. Accordingly, a higher mix of software orders will impact the amount of revenue recognized in 2025. Fundamentally, there is no economic difference between the revenue recognition methodologies.3 Cash flow is the same under the three accounting methodologies, but the difference in the amount of revenue recognized in 2025 can be substantial.
The Compensation Committee understood that this unanticipated change in revenue recognition for a portion of Telos’ future 2025 revenue meant that the revenue performance levels for these specific LTI grants were going to represent significantly higher hurdles than intended, rendering the grants unsuitable for the incentive purpose for which they were made, despite the fact that the change in accounting treatment had no impact on the underlying economic performance goals of the grants. Given that the existing free cash flow performance levels for these grants were not impacted by the net/gross revenue recognition accounting treatment, and the irrelevance of that treatment to the underlying economic performance goals of the grants, the Committee elected to amend the grants to eliminate the revenue performance component of these grants and leave the free cash flow component intact. The amounts of PSUs awarded did not change; only one element required for their vesting (revenue performance) was eliminated. As amended, the details of the grants are as follows:
 
 
 
 
AMENDED LTI PSU GRANT #2 (in PSUs Vesting Per Performance Level)
 
 
Executive
 
 
FCF >$0
 
 
FCF ≥$2,000,000
 
 
FCF ≥$6,000,000
 
 
FCF ≥$12,000,000
 
 
John B. Wood
 
 
241,814
 
 
483,628
 
 
725,442
 
 
967,256
 
 
Mark Bendza
 
 
120,755
 
 
241,509
 
 
362,264
 
 
483,018
 
 
Mark D. Griffin
 
 
94,980
 
 
189,960
 
 
284,940
 
 
379,920
 
 
Hutch Robbins
 
 
67,596
 
 
135,193
 
 
202,789
 
 
270,386
 
 
Malcolm Cooke
 
 
4,702
 
 
9,403
 
 
14,105
 
 
18,806
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The number of PSUs that would vest, if any, will be determined by the final 2025 free cash flow amount as reported on the Company’s 2025 10-K. If 2025 free cash flow falls between these performance levels (for example, at $5,000,000), the PSUs earned would be calculated on a straight-line interpolation between the number of PSUs for the adjacent lower and higher levels (using the $5,000,000 example, the interpolation would be between the number of PSUs for the ≥$2,000,000 level and the number of PSUs for the ≥$6,000,000 level).
3
In any of the three instances, the amount of cash flow generated by the Company in 2025 for a sale is the same. For example, assume on October 1, 2025, the Company sells for $100 a product that it bought for $80. If recognized as gross revenue at a point in time, the Company collects $100 from the customer, pays $80 to the vendor, generates $20 of cash flow, and recognizes $100 of revenue during the fourth quarter of 2025. If recognized as gross revenue over a one-year period of performance, the Company collects $100 from the customer, pays $80 to the vendor, generates $20 of cash flow, and recognizes $25 of revenue during the fourth quarter of 2025. If recognized as net revenue at a point in time, the Company collects $100 from the customer, pays $80 to the vendor, generates $20 of cash flow, and recognizes $20 of revenue during the fourth quarter of 2025.
32

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•
Stock Price LTI Grants (“LTI PSU Grant #3)
Following its mandate to align incentive compensation with a demonstrated increase in stockholder value, and recognizing the importance of increasing the Company’s enterprise value to stockholders, executives, employees and other stakeholders in the business, the Compensation Committee elected to place the lion’s share of the focus of 2024 executive compensation on incentivizing a sustained, long-term increase in the share price of Telos’ Common Stock. Consistent with the Company’s growth strategy, the Committee envisioned equity grants that would vest only when the closing price of a share of Telos’ Common Stock on the NASDAQ Global Market (or any public market upon which the shares may later trade) exceeded certain performance levels and remained above those levels for fifty (50) consecutive calendar days at any point prior to January 1, 2027.
At the time of the Committee’s deliberation on these grants, in mid-May 2024, the Company’s stock was trading roughly between $3 and $4 a share. The Committee believed that Company executives should be incentivized to drive Company performance to a level where the price of a Telos share was consistently traded for no less than $6 prior to January 1, 2027. And, the Committee sought to further incentivize Company performance – over the same time period – to a level where the TLS share price would meet or exceed (on a sustained basis) $8, $10 and $12 a share.
Accordingly, the Committee issued long-term incentive grants to the Company’s executive officers as follows:
 
 
 
 
LTI PSU GRANT #3 (in PSUs Vesting Per Performance Level)
 
 
Executive
 
 
$6 TLS Price
50 Consecutive
Days
Prior to 1/1/27
 
 
$8 TLS Price
50 Consecutive
Days
Prior to 1/1/27
 
 
$10 TLS Price
50 Consecutive
Days
Prior to 1/1/27
 
 
$12 TLS Price
50 Consecutive
Days
Prior 1/1/27
 
 
Total
Maximum
Possible
Vest
 
 
John B. Wood
 
 
660,925
 
 
660,925
 
 
991,388
 
 
1,321,851
 
 
3,635,089
 
 
Mark Bendza
 
 
243,362
 
 
243,362
 
 
365,042
 
 
486,723
 
 
1,338,489
 
 
Mark D. Griffin
 
 
191,417
 
 
191,417
 
 
287,126
 
 
382,834
 
 
1,052,794
 
 
Hutch Robbins
 
 
136,230
 
 
136,230
 
 
204,345
 
 
272,460
 
 
749,265
 
 
Malcolm Cooke
 
 
9,475
 
 
9,475
 
 
14,213
 
 
18,950
 
 
52,113
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
•
Time-Based Long-Term Incentive Grants (“LTI RSU Grant”)
As noted above, the Compensation Committee believes there is retentive and stockholder alignment value in long-term equity grants that vest over a period of time, provided the recipient remains in service to the Company. Considering that no such grants had been made in 2023, the Committee elected in 2024 to make time-based equity grants to all Company executive officers, except the CEO. The grants would span a two-year period from date of grant (May 16, 2024), with one half of each grant vesting on the first anniversary of the grant date, and one half on the second anniversary:
 
 
 
 
LTI RSU GRANT
 
 
Executive
 
 
RSUs Vesting May 2025
 
 
RSUs Vesting May 2026
 
 
Total Grant
 
 
Mark Bendza
 
 
217,335
 
 
217,335
 
 
434,670
 
 
Mark D. Griffin
 
 
170,946
 
 
170,946
 
 
341,892
 
 
Hutch Robbins
 
 
121,660
 
 
121,661
 
 
243,321
 
 
Malcolm Cooke
 
 
8,462
 
 
8,462
 
 
16,924
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
•
Value of the grants and rigor of the metrics and performance levels chosen
The Compensation Committee’s goal for long-term incentive executive compensation for 2024 was to drive superior Company performance over a three-year period – 2024 through 2026 – by incentivizing the three major strategic goals described above. The Committee allocated certain maximum dollar values for each set of the three sets of long-term incentive grants, based on the importance of the strategic goal and the perceived difficulty in meeting the performance levels within that goal (with greater importance and difficulty warranting larger grant amounts). Therefore, the value of the
33

TABLE OF CONTENTS

grants tied to PreCheck enrollment sites was less than half the value of the grants tied to 2025 free cash flow, and those two grants together were a little less than half of the value of the grants tied to increases in the stock price.4

 
The Committee selected a base performance “target” level for each set of grants that constituted performance sufficiently acceptable to merit partial vesting of the grants, and below which no stock would vest. These minimum targets were:
○
Opening 250 PreCheck enrollment sites by 2027
○
Positive free cash flow in 2025
○
A $6 stock price, sustained for 50 consecutive days by 2027
In setting the value of the grants, the Committee considered the fact that no long-term equity incentive grants had been made in 2023, and adjusted values upward somewhat to account therefor. Nevertheless, the dollar values (at grant date) at the target level of performance for the three performance-based equity grants, plus the dollar value (at grant date) of the time-based equity grants, resulted in total dollar values slightly below (for Mr. Wood) or slightly above the one-year target long-term incentive compensation for each officer that the Company set in 2022 and reaffirmed in early 2024:
 
 
 
 
LTI DOLALR VALUES AT TARGET PERFORMANCE LEVEL(1)
 
 
Executive
 
 
LTI PSU
Grant #1
(250 Sites)
 
 
LTI PSU
Grant #2
(Positive ‘25
FCF)
 
 
LTI PSU
Grant #3
($6 Price ≥ 50
Days)
 
 
LTI RSU
Grant
 
 
Total
 
 
John B. Wood
 
 
$411,013
 
 
$1,090,581
 
 
$2,980,772
 
 
$0
 
 
$4,482,366
 
 
Mark Bendza
 
 
205,245
 
 
544,605
 
 
1,097,563
 
 
1,556,119
 
 
3,403,532
 
 
Mark D. Griffin
 
 
161,437
 
 
428,360
 
 
863,291
 
 
1,223,973
 
 
2,677,061
 
 
Hutch Robbins
 
 
114,893
 
 
304,858
 
 
614,397
 
 
871,089
 
 
1,905,237
 
 
Malcolm Cooke
 
 
7,991
 
 
21,206
 
 
42,732
 
 
60,588
 
 
132,517
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
Amounts calculated by multiplying the number of shares that would vest at achievement of the performance level times the reported TLS price per share on the grant date.
4
The share amounts of the LTI grants were determined in a manner similar to the amounts for 2024 AIP. The Compensation Committee determined three total maximum dollar value “pools,” one for each set of grants. With the exception of the pool for LTI PSU Grant #3 (predicated on stock price), each of the pools contemplated LTI grants to both NEOs and eligible members of senior management in a total combined maximum amount no greater than the pool. LTI PSU Grant #3 was made to executives, only. As with AIP, the amount of any individual NEO’s LTI grants was determined using that individual’s proportion of total LTI based on total direct compensation amounts approved by the Committee. The Committee set the amount of the grants in dollars, and the number of shares for each grant was determined by dividing the dollar value of the grant by a three-day average of the Telos stock price for the three days prior to and including the grant date.
34

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Committee selected rigorous incremental performance levels above the target that would generate meaningful value to the Company if they were achieved. The rigor of these performance levels is demonstrated, for example, by the year-over-year growth that would be required for LTI PSU Grant #2 (based on 2025 free cash flow) to vest. The Company would need to demonstrate year-over-year free cash flow improvement of $39,700,000 to achieve the target level, and for the maximum number of shares in the grants to vest, the Company would need to show year-over-year free cash flow growth of $51,700,000:
 
 
 
 
FREE CASH FLOW GROWTH AT LTI PSU GRANT #2 PERFORMANCE LEVELS
 
 
2024 Free Cash Flow
 
 
Performance Level
 
 
Year-Over-Year FCF Growth
 
 
($39,700,000)
 
 
>$0
 
 
+$39,700,000
 
 
($39,700,000)
 
 
≥$2,000,000
 
 
+$41,700,000
 
 
($39,700,000)
 
 
≥$6,000,000
 
 
+$45,700,000
 
 
($39,700,000)
 
 
≥$12,000,000
 
 
+$51,700,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Acknowledging the significance to stockholders of a sustained increase in the price of Telos Common Stock, the Compensation Committee placed the highest emphasis on incentivizing that outcome. To ensure that any stock price increase would be sustained over time, and to ensure rigor in the performance levels before vesting could occur, the Committee required that the stock price at each performance level be maintained for no less than fifty (50) consecutive calendar days before performance would be considered achieved and the PSUs associated therewith would vest. Considering the historical volatility in Telos’ stock price, the 50 consecutive day requirement meant, as a practical matter, that Telos’ stock would have to be consistently trading at a significantly higher value than the performance level for those 50 days in order to remain at or above the required price.
The values of the grants tied to stock price increases were admittedly significant – at maximum potential value they were much larger than any grants the Company has made historically, and well above any traditional “target” compensation for executives, for two primary reasons. First, the Committee considered the goals to be highly significant to the Company’s long-term success and worthy of incentivizing to the fullest extent; yet, considering the Company’s recent performance and stock price ranges, the Committee considered achievement of the goals by 2027 to be a significant, and worthy, challenge. Second, in setting the values of the grants, the Committee considered the increase in Company market capitalization represented by achieving the performance levels:
 
 
 
 
IMPLIED GROWTH IN MARKET CAPITALIZATION
AT LTI PSU GRANT #3 PERFORMANCE LEVELS
 
 
Stock
Price(1)
 
 
Outstanding
Shares(2)
 
 
Market
Capitalization
 
 
Performance
Level (Share
Price for >
50 Days)
 
 
Capitalization at
Performance
Level
 
 
Capitalization
Growth
 
 
$4.51
 
 
71,850,000
 
 
$324,043,500
 
 
$6
 
 
$431,108,000
 
 
+$107,056,500
 
 
$4.51
 
 
71,850,000
 
 
$324,043,500
 
 
$8
 
 
$574,800,000
 
 
+$250,756,500
 
 
$4.51
 
 
71,850,000
 
 
$324,043,500
 
 
$10
 
 
$718,500,000
 
 
+$394,456,500
 
 
$4.51
 
 
71,850,000
 
 
$324,043,500
 
 
$12
 
 
$862,200,000
 
 
+$538,156,500
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
Price on grant date
(2)
Weighted average shares outstanding in 2024
The total maximum amount of the LTI PSU Grant #3 grants to the CEO and other NEOs (calculated as the maximum number of shares granted times the reported price per TLS share on the grant date) is $30,793,152, which represents approximately 5.7% of the growth in market capitalization that would be realized if the maximum performance levels were achieved (using the share price and outstanding share amounts in the table above).
Perquisites
We provide certain perquisites to our executive officers in order to allow the executives to work more efficiently and to help us remain competitive by retaining talented and dedicated executives. These perquisites are limited to reimbursement for golf club membership, and, in certain circumstances, commuting costs. The Compensation Committee believes that the perquisites are consistent with our overall compensation program. No changes to our
35

TABLE OF CONTENTS

perquisites are currently contemplated by the Compensation Committee or the senior executive team. See “All Other Compensation” of the Summary Compensation Table below for the amounts of the perquisites provided to the named executive officers.
Executive Officer Employment Agreements
We are party to employment agreements with each of the named executive officers. All of the agreements provide for payment of a base salary, bonus, eligibility for stock option and restricted share grants under our stock option and restricted share plans, and vacation days. Each of the agreements also provides for eligibility to participate in all plans that we maintain for our salaried senior executives, including, without limitation, pension, profit-sharing or other retirement plans, life, accident, disability, medical, hospital or similar group insurance programs and any other benefit plan, subject to the normal terms and conditions of such plans.
According to the employment agreements, in the case of termination of the employment agreement for cause, or if the executive terminates the agreement for any reason (after providing 30 days prior written notice to us of such termination), such executive would only be entitled to receive the following:
•
a lump-sum payment equivalent to the remaining unpaid portion of the executive’s salary for the period ending on the date of termination,
•
lump-sum payment for all accrued and unused paid time off,
•
any bonus which has been earned by the respective executive, but which remains unpaid as of the date of the executive’s termination of employment, at such time and in such manner as if the executive had continued to be employed by us, and
•
any other payments or benefits provided to the executive pursuant to any employee benefit plans or arrangements adopted by the Company (to the extent such benefits are earned and vested or are required by law to be offered) through the date of termination.
In the case of termination of the respective executive’s employment without cause, or due to disability or death, the employment agreements provide for, in addition to the amounts payable under the preceding paragraph:
•
a monthly payment equivalent to base salary then in effect over a period of 24 months in the case of Mr. Wood, 18 months for Mr. Griffin, and 12 months for Messrs. Bendza, Robbins and Cooke,
•
immediate vesting of the unvested portion of any outstanding stock options and any outstanding shares of restricted stock,
•
the cash equivalent of premium payments for continued coverage under the medical, dental, short and long-term disability, and life insurance and other similar plans equal to 24 months in the case of Mr. Wood, 18 months for Mr. Griffin, and 12 months for Messrs. Bendza, Robbins and Cooke,
•
the cash equivalent of the employer matching contribution as if the executive was still a plan participant under our 401(k) plan that would otherwise have been contributed on the executive’s behalf, based on certain assumptions, for a period of 24 months in the case of Mr. Wood, 18 months for Mr. Griffin, and 12 months for Messrs. Bendza, Robbins and Cooke, and
•
payment of premiums to continue the Executive Life Policy, in which the executive is the holder of the policy, for 24 months from the date of termination for Mr. Wood.
Under the agreements, termination by the Company “without cause” means involuntary termination at our discretion which is not based on cause, death, or disability. “Cause” is defined as gross negligence or willful and continued failure by the executive to substantially perform his duties as an employee of ours (other than any such failure resulting from incapacity due to physical or mental illness) or the executive’s dishonesty, fraudulent misrepresentation, willful misconduct, malfeasance, violation of fiduciary duty relating to our business, or conviction of a felony. The executive is deemed “disabled” if he is eligible for disability benefits under our long-term disability plan, or has a physical or mental disability which renders the executive incapable, after reasonable accommodation, of performing substantially all of executive’s duties under the agreement for a period of 180 consecutive or non-consecutive days in any 12-month period.
Upon termination of employment due to a “change in control” (as defined in the employment agreements and summarized below) of the Company, for Messrs. Wood and Griffin, or termination without cause within 12 months
36

TABLE OF CONTENTS

of a change in control for Messrs. Bendza, Robbins and Cooke, each of the executives would be entitled to a lump-sum payment in the following amounts in addition to the amounts payable to the executive if the Company terminates the agreement for cause or the executive terminates the agreement for any reason:
•
in the case of Mr. Wood, (i) the amount of monthly salary that Mr. Wood was being paid as of the date of his termination of employment times 24 months, plus (ii) two times the annual average of the bonuses earned or to be earned for the current year (i.e., the year in which the change of control occurs) and the two prior years; and
•
in the case of Messrs. Bendza, Robbins and Cooke, (i) the amount of monthly salary that such executive was being paid as of the date of his termination of employment times 12 months, plus (ii) one times the annual average of the bonuses earned or to be earned for the current year and the two prior years; and
•
in the case of Mr. Griffin, the amount of monthly salary that such executive was being paid as of the date of his termination of employment times 18 months; and
For purposes of calculating the amounts payable to Messrs. Wood, Bendza, Robbins and Cooke, the bonus amount for the current year is equal to the amount earned or scheduled to be earned as if the bonus targets set in the bonus plan have been met. In addition to this payment, immediate vesting of the unvested portion of any outstanding stock options and any outstanding shares of restricted stock held by executives would occur, and the executives would also be entitled to a lump sum payment equal to (1) the cash equivalent of 24 months, in the case of Mr. Wood, or 18 months for Mr. Griffin and 12 months for Messrs. Bendza, Robbins and Cooke, of continued coverage under the medical, dental, short and long-term disability, and life insurance and other similar plans, (2) the cash equivalent of the employer matching contribution as if the executive was still a plan participant under the Company’s 401(k) plan that would otherwise have been contributed on the executive’s behalf, based on certain assumptions, for a period of 24 months, in the case of Mr. Wood, or 18 months for Mr. Griffin and 12 months for Messrs. Bendza, Robbins and Cooke, and (3) payment of premiums to continue the Executive Life Policy, in which the executive is the holder of the policy, for 24 months from the date of termination for Mr. Wood.
For purposes of the employment agreements, a “change in control” means an occasion upon which (1) any one person, or more than one person acting as a group (other than a member of the Board of Directors or fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company or a corporation controlled by the Company) directly or indirectly acquires securities of the Company representing 50% or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities during the 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition of the Company’s securities by such person or persons, or (2) during any period of twelve consecutive months, a majority of the members of the Board of Directors is replaced by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the Board of Directors before the date of the appointment or election, or (3) any one person or more than one person acting as a group acquires (or has acquired during the 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons) all, or substantially all, of the Company’s assets. The foregoing lump-sum payments will be made (a) contemporaneously with the consummation of the transaction or the election of directors that constitutes the change in control with respect to Messrs. Wood and Griffin, and (b) as of the “date of termination” (as defined in the employment agreements) with respect to Messrs. Bendza, Robbins and Cooke.
Non-Competition, Confidentiality, and Non-Solicitation Provisions
Pursuant to their respective employment agreements, Messrs. Bendza, Robbins, Cooke and Griffin are subject to non-competition, confidentiality, and non-solicitation provisions which are applicable to each executive during their respective employment terms and for a period of 18 months subsequent to the date of any termination for Mr. Griffin, and 12 months for Messrs. Bendza, Robbins and Cooke. Similarly, Mr. Wood is subject to non-competition, confidentiality, and non-solicitation provisions during his employment term and for a period of 24 months subsequent to the date of any termination.
Clawback Policy
On November 7, 2022, the Board of Directors adopted a clawback policy that provides that any incentive compensation (including both cash and equity compensation) paid to any current or former executive officer is subject to recoupment if (i) the incentive compensation was calculated based on financial statements that were required to be restated due to material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements, without regard to any
37

TABLE OF CONTENTS

fault or misconduct; and (ii) that noncompliance resulted in overpayment of the incentive compensation within the three fiscal years preceding the date the restatement was required. The Clawback Policy is available on our website at https://investors.telos.com/ and was filed as an exhibit to our 2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K. No disclosures under the Clawback Policy were necessary or made in 2024.
Hedging Prohibitions
Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits designated “Insiders,” which includes our Directors and NEOs, among others, from entering into hedging, monetization transactions, or similar arrangements with respect to Company securities.
Other Employment Benefits
We maintain employee benefit and perquisite programs for executive and senior officers and other employees. We have no current plans to provide any other additional benefits for our executive officers, other than as described above. We believe that the benefits provided are competitive and consistent with industry practice.
Welfare Benefits. We have broad-based health, dental, vision, life and disability benefit programs that are available to all employees on an equal basis.
401(k) Savings Plan (“Telos Shared Savings Plan”). We sponsor a defined contribution employee savings plan which enables employees to contribute a certain percentage of their base salary to their savings plan accounts on a pre-tax basis, subject to federal tax limitations under the Internal Revenue Code. Starting in March 2022, we matched 50% of the first 8% of employee contributions to the Telos Shared Savings Plan per pay period, an increase from 4% in prior years. Participant contributions vested immediately, and Company contributions vested at the rate of 20% for each year, with full vesting occurring after completion of five years of service. Starting in September 2023, we changed the vesting schedule for the Company contribution. For employees with less than one year of service, only 20% vested upon the completion of their first year. However, upon completion of the second year, 100% of the Company contribution vests. We had discretion to fund the match in cash or a combination of both cash and Company stock. For 2024, we funded the employer match contribution in Company stock in the first quarter of 2025. Even though it was funded at the beginning of the following year, employees who terminate prior to the funding date will still receive accrued and vested matching funds that occurred prior to the date of the termination of their employment.
Stockholder Engagement
We value the opinions of our stockholders. Stockholder feedback, including through direct discussion and prior stockholder votes, is reported to our Board and the Compensation Committee, as it relates to executive compensation, when received and as warranted. Our goal is to be responsive to our stockholders when making compensation decisions for our executive officers, including our NEOs, and to ensure we understand and address their concerns and observations.
Management Development and Compensation Committee Report
The Management Development and Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.
Submitted by the Management Development and Compensation Committee of the Board.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fredrick D. Schaufeld, Chairman
 
 
 
David Borland
 
 
 
Bonnie Carroll
 
 
 
Derrick D. Dockery
 
 
 
Brad Jacobs
 
 
 
 
38

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the compensation for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 by the chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and the three other most highly-compensated executive officers.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Name and Principal
Position
 
 
Year
 
 
Salary
 
 
Bonus
 
 
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(1)
 
 
Stock
Award(2)
 
 
All Other
Compensation(5)
 
 
Total
John B. Wood
Chairman,
President and CEO
 
 
2024
 
 
$600,000
 
 
 
 
$197,118
 
 
$17,239,419
 
 
$ 45,808
 
 
$18,082,345
 
2023
 
 
600,000
 
 
—
 
 
600,000
 
 
—
 
 
49,826
 
 
1,249,826
 
2022
 
 
600,000
 
 
$10,000(4)
 
 
—
 
 
10,078,653
 
 
38,691
 
 
10,727,344
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mark Bendza
Executive V.P., CFO
 
 
2024
 
 
410,000
 
 
 
 
101,023
 
 
8,718,627
 
 
10,497
 
 
9,240,147
 
2023
 
 
410,000
 
 
—
 
 
615,000
 
 
—
 
 
9,480
 
 
1,034,480
 
2022
 
 
410,000
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
4,258,185
 
 
9,327
 
 
4,677,512
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mark G. Griffin
Executive V.P.,
Security Solutions
 
 
2024
 
 
395,010
 
 
20,000(4)
 
 
97,327
 
 
6,857,678
 
 
14,172
 
 
7,384,187
 
2023
 
 
395,010
 
 
—
 
 
592,500
 
 
—
 
 
13,680
 
 
1,001,190
 
2022
 
 
395,010
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
4,303,691
 
 
12,660
 
 
4,711,361
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hutch Robbins
Executive V.P.,
General Counsel
 
 
2024
 
 
385,000
 
 
 
 
94,863
 
 
4,880,551
 
 
49,212
 
 
5,409,626
 
2023
 
 
385,000
 
 
—
 
 
577,500
 
 
—
 
 
31,680
 
 
994,180
 
2022
 
 
336,875
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
4,232,414
 
 
28,370
 
 
4,597,659
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Malcolm G. Cooke(3)
Vice President, Chief
Information Technology
Officer
 
 
2024
 
 
262,380
 
 
200
 
 
29,568
 
 
416,390
 
 
11,738
 
 
720,276
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
The amounts in this column reflect the Annual Incentive Plan awards earned by our NEOs.
(2)
Represents the grant date fair value of the RSUs and PSUs issued under our 2016 LTIP. See assumptions made in the valuation of these awards for financial statement reporting purposes in Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
(3)
Mr. Cooke was a Named Executive Officer for the first time in 2024.
(4)
Amount represents an anniversary bonus.
(5)
Amounts presented consist of the following in 2024:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Name
 
 
Life Insurance and
Long-Term Disability
Premiums
 
 
401(k) Company
Match
 
 
Perquisites(1)
 
 
Total All
Other Compensation
John B. Wood
 
 
$ 21,191
 
 
$11,500
 
 
$13,117
 
 
$ 45,808
Mark Bendza
 
 
372
 
 
10,125
 
 
—
 
 
10,497
Mark D. Griffin
 
 
372
 
 
13,800
 
 
—
 
 
14,172
Hutch Robbins
 
 
372
 
 
13,800
 
 
35,040
 
 
49,212
Malcolm G. Cooke
 
 
372
 
 
11,366
 
 
—
 
 
11,738
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
Includes reimbursement for golf club membership and commuting costs.
39

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Grants Of Plan-Based Awards
The following table provides information about the AIP awards granted to our named executive officers during fiscal year 2024.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Grant Date
 
 
Estimated Possible
Payouts under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards(1)
 
 
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
 
 
Stock Award
(units)(2)
 
 
Grant Date
Fair Market
Value
 
 
 
 
 
 
Target
 
 
Maximum
 
 
Target
 
 
Maximum
 
 
 
 
 
 
John Wood
 
 
 
 
$394,000
 
 
$526,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
—
 
 
 
5/16/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
114,808
 
 
516,636
 
 
 
 
$1,849,557
 
5/28/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
902,739
 
 
4,605,345
 
 
 
 
15,389,892
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mark Bendza
 
 
 
 
202,000
 
 
263,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5/16/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
434,670
 
 
1,556,119
 
5/16/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
57,332
 
 
257,992
 
 
 
 
923,608
 
5/28/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
364,117
 
 
1,821,507
 
 
 
 
6,238,901
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mark Griffin
 
 
 
 
194,000
 
 
259,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5/16/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
341,892
 
 
1,223,973
 
5/16/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
45,094
 
 
202,925
 
 
 
 
726,472
 
5/28/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
286,397
 
 
1,432,714
 
 
 
 
4,907,233
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hutch Robbins
 
 
 
 
190,000
 
 
253,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5/16/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
243,321
 
 
871,089
 
5/16/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
32,093
 
 
144,420
 
 
 
 
517,024
 
5/28/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
203,826
 
 
1,019,651
 
 
 
 
3,492,438
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Malcolm Cooke
 
 
 
 
60,000
 
 
79,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5/16/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
16,924
 
 
60,588
 
5/16/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
2,232
 
 
10,044
 
 
 
 
35,958
 
5/28/2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
14,177
 
 
70,919
 
 
 
 
319,845
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
Actual amount paid for fiscal year 2024 performance are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table. Dollar values rounded to the nearest thousand.
(2)
Represents time-based restricted share units granted in fiscal year 2024 only.
As described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”), starting on page 21, the Compensation Committee approved AIP awards for the 2024 performance period that are described in the above table as Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards. The actual amounts paid for fiscal year 2024 performance are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table, and the CD&A. The CD&A contains a detailed description of the 2024 AIP program structure and payments, and the 2024 equity incentive plan (2016 LTIP) grants structure, metrics, performance levels, and potential payout amounts. As described in the CD&A, these non-equity and equity awards were structured using established payouts or numbers of shares to vest at achievement of pre-established performance levels. In the foregoing table, “target” represents the units or dollars payable upon achievement of the initial performance levels for these awards, and “maximum” reflects the units or dollars payable upon achievement of the maximum performance levels.
40

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Outstanding Equity Awards At Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth certain information regarding outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2024 for the Company’s named executive officers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of
Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
 
 
Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested
($)
 
 
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights that Have
Not Vested
 
 
Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned Shares, Units
or other Rights That
Have Not Vested
($)
John Wood
 
 
—
 
 
$—
 
 
1,017,547(3)
 
 
$3,480,011
Mark Bendza
 
 
434,670(1)
 
 
1,486,571
 
 
421,449(3)
 
 
1,441,356
Mark Griffin
 
 
341,892(1)
 
 
1,169,271
 
 
331,491(3)
 
 
1,133,699
Hutch Robbins
 
 
286,094(2)
 
 
978,441
 
 
235,919(3)
 
 
806,843
Malcolm Cooke
 
 
16,924(1)
 
 
57,880
 
 
16,409(3)
 
 
56,119
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
50% RSUs scheduled to vest on 5/16/2025; remaining shares scheduled to vest on 5/16/2026.
(2)
42,773 RSUs vested on 2/1/2025; 121,660 scheduled to vest on 5/16/2025; remaining shares scheduled to vest on 5/16/2026.
(3)
Actual vesting date is contingent on achievement of performance criteria which are not determinable as of year-end.
Stock Vested
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the vesting of shares of restricted stock held by named executive officers during fiscal year 2024:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Name
 
 
Number of shares
acquired on vesting
 
 
Value Realized on
vesting(1)
John B. Wood
 
 
57,648
 
 
$228,863
Mark Bendza
 
 
15,360
 
 
61,829
Mark D. Griffin
 
 
12,354
 
 
48,798
Hutch Robbins
 
 
42,771
 
 
168,518
Malcolm G. Cooke
 
 
49,342
 
 
181,085
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
Based on the closing market price on vesting date.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
As disclosed above, the Company has entered into employment agreements with certain executive officers which provide for potential payments upon termination or change in control. The table below summarizes the potential payouts to Messrs. Wood, Bendza, Robbins and Griffin for the termination events described above assuming such termination occurred on December 31, 2024, the last business day of the Company’s last completed fiscal year.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Salary
Continuation
for 24, 18 or
12 Months
 
 
Bonuses to
be Earned
 
 
Accrued
and
Unused
Vacation
12/31/24
 
 
Continuation
of Medical /
Welfare
Benefits for
24, 18 or
12 Months(1)
 
 
401(k)
Company
Match for
24, 18 or
12 Months
 
 
Total
 
 
Number of
Restricted
Shares that
Would Vest
John B. Wood
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Termination without cause
 
 
$1,200,000
 
 
$—
 
 
$89,204
 
 
$113,878
 
 
$27,600
 
 
$1,430,681
 
 
5,118,981
Termination upon death/disability
 
 
1,200,000
 
 
—
 
 
89,204
 
 
113,878
 
 
27,600
 
 
1,430,681
 
 
5,118,981
Termination upon change in control
 
 
1,200,000
 
 
531,412
 
 
89,204
 
 
113,878
 
 
27,600
 
 
1,962,093
 
 
5,118,981
Termination for cause
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
89,204
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
89,204
 
 
—
Voluntary termination
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
89,204
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
89,204
 
 
—
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
41

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Salary
Continuation
for 24, 18 or
12 Months
 
 
Bonuses to
be Earned
 
 
Accrued
and
Unused
Vacation
12/31/24
 
 
Continuation
of Medical /
Welfare
Benefits for
24, 18 or
12 Months(1)
 
 
401(k)
Company
Match for
24, 18 or
12 Months
 
 
Total
 
 
Number of
Restricted
Shares that
Would Vest
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mark Bendza
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Termination without cause
 
 
410,000
 
 
—
 
 
37,846
 
 
20,670
 
 
13,800
 
 
482,316
 
 
2,514,168
Termination upon death/disability
 
 
410,000
 
 
37,846
 
 
20,670
 
 
13,800
 
 
482,316
 
 
2,514,168
 
 
 
Termination upon change in control
 
 
410,000
 
 
238,674
 
 
37,846
 
 
20,670
 
 
13,800
 
 
720,990
 
 
2,514,168
Termination for cause
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
37,846
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
37,846
 
 
—
Voluntary termination
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
37,846
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
37,846
 
 
—
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mark D. Griffin
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Termination without cause
 
 
592,515
 
 
—
 
 
64,474
 
 
31,005
 
 
20,700
 
 
708,694
 
 
1,977,531
Termination upon death/disability
 
 
592,515
 
 
—
 
 
64,474
 
 
31,005
 
 
20,700
 
 
708,694
 
 
1,977,531
Termination upon change in control
 
 
592,515
 
 
—
 
 
64,474
 
 
31,005
 
 
20,700
 
 
708,694
 
 
1,977,531
Termination for cause
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
64,474
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
64,47
 
 
—
Voluntary termination
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
64,474
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
64,47
 
 
—
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hutch Robbins
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Termination without cause
 
 
385,000
 
 
—
 
 
41,832
 
 
20,645
 
 
13,800
 
 
461,276
 
 
1,450,165
Termination upon death/disability
 
 
385,000
 
 
—
 
 
41,832
 
 
20,645
 
 
13,800
 
 
461,276
 
 
1,450,165
Termination after change in control
 
 
385,000
 
 
224,121
 
 
41,832
 
 
20,645
 
 
13,800
 
 
685,397
 
 
1,450,165
Termination for cause
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
41,832
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
41,832
 
 
—
Voluntary termination
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
41,832
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
41,832
 
 
—
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Malcolm G. Cooke(2)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Termination without cause
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
28,050
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
28,050
 
 
—
Termination upon death/disability
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
28,050
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
28,050
 
 
—
Termination after change in control
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
28,050
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
28,050
 
 
—
Termination for cause
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
28,050
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
28,050
 
 
—
Voluntary termination
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
28,050
 
 
—
 
 
—
 
 
28,050
 
 
—
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
For Mr. Wood, this includes the cash equivalent of premium payments for continued coverage under the medical, dental, short and long-term disability, and life insurance and other similar plans, and payment of premiums for continuation of an Executive Life Policy, in which the executive is the holder of the policy. For the other executives, this includes the cash equivalent of premium payments for continued coverage under the medical, dental, short and long-term disability, and life insurance and other similar plans.
(2)
Mr. Cooke did not enter into an employment agreement with the Company until February 20, 2025.
42

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Officers
Set forth below is biographical information concerning the executive officers (other than Mr. Wood, whose biographical information is included above for the director nominees), who are appointed by the Board of Directors and serve until their successors are appointed and qualified. Each of our executive officers is a United States citizen.
 
 
 
 
Mark Bendza
 
Age | 49
 
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, since July 2021. Mr. Bendza has overall responsibility for the Company’s accounting, financial reporting, financial planning and analysis, financial strategy and operations, corporate development, contracts, purchasing, investor relations, tax, and treasury functions. Mr. Bendza has over 20 years of experience in investor relations, business development, financial planning and analysis, financial strategy, mergers and acquisitions, and capital markets. Prior to joining the Company, he held positions of increasing responsibility in finance and business management with global companies, including vice president and head of investor relations for Honeywell from 2019 to 2021; vice president of international business for Northrop Grumman from 2016 to 2019; director of financial planning and analysis for Northrop Grumman from 2012 to 2015; and mergers and acquisitions, capital markets, and credit roles with major investments banks from 1998 to 2011. Mr. Bendza holds a bachelor’s degree from Wesleyan University and an MBA from Columbia Business School.
 
Since October 2024, Mr. Bendza sits on the Board of Directors of Modine Manufacturing (NYSE: MOD) in Racine, Wisconsin, a thermal management technology company. He also sits on the audit committee of the Modine board.
 
 
 
 
Mark D. Griffin
 
Age | 64
 
 
Executive Vice President, Security Solutions, and President, General Manager, Telos Identity Management Solutions, LLC (“Telos ID”). Mr. Griffin joined the Company in 1984 as program manager. He was promoted to vice president for the Company’s traditional business division in January 2004 and to Vice President, Identity Management, effective January 2007. In April 2007, he was appointed to head the newly formed Telos ID. In November 2021, Mr. Griffin also assumed the role of Executive Vice President, Security Solutions. Mr. Griffin was previously a board member of the Federation for Identity and Cross-Credentialing Systems (“FiXs”) in Fairfax, Virginia, a coalition of commercial companies, government contractors, and non-profit entities that have established and maintained a worldwide, interoperable identity and cross-credentialing network built on security, trust, privacy, standard operating rules, policies and technical standards. Mr. Griffin has over 30 years’ experience in government IT contracting, materials management and systems integration projects in the electronics and communications fields. He has been involved in day-to-day operations of and has had overall management responsibility for many of Telos’ most critical programs for the Army, Navy, Federal Aviation Administration, Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC), General Services Administration, and Immigration and Naturalization Services. Mr. Griffin holds a Bachelor of Science in Engineering from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
 
 
 
 
E. Hutchinson (“Hutch”) Robbins, Jr.
 
Age | 58
 
 
Executive Vice President, General Counsel since February 2022. Over the course of a three-decade legal career, Mr. Robbins has advised and advocated for his clients across a wide array of challenging business issues. From 1993 through January 2022, Mr. Robbins was an associate and principal of Miles & Stockbridge P.C., in Baltimore, Maryland, and from 2006 through 2016, he led the firm’s Commercial and Business Litigation Practice Group. Over the course of his career, Mr. Robbins has resolved hundreds of complex disputes through negotiation, alternative dispute resolution, and litigation, in addition to advising his clients on business strategy, contract terms, and risk avoidance. Mr. Robbins earned his juris doctor degree, with honors, from Duke University in 1993, and his undergraduate degree, with honors, from Trinity College in 1988. Mr. Robbins is on the Advisory Board of the Maryland Volunteer Lawyers Service and is a trustee of Baltimore Center Stage.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
43

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 
 
 
Malcolm G. Cooke
 
Age | 50
 
 
Vice President, Chief Information Technology Officer. Mr. Cooke joined the Company in June 2008 as a systems engineer. He was promoted to various positions since then and has held his current position since July 2013. In this role, Mr. Cooke is responsible for all of the Company’s corporate information technology operational readiness, as well as internal information technology initiatives and strategy. He oversees the physical, logical, and industrial security for all Telos facilities. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Cooke served in various IT support and management roles at Equitrac and ReMax, and also served in the U.S. Navy. Since 2021, Mr. Cooke has served on the Board of Directors of the ARC of Loudoun, which advocates for, educates and supports people with disabilities and their families. Mr. Cooke has numerous certifications, including A+, N+, Security +, MSS, MCP, MCSA, MCTS, and VMTSP. Mr. Cooke holds a bachelor’s degree in information technology from American InterContinental University and an associate’s degree in computer science from ECPI University.
 
 
 
 
Donna K. Hill
 
Age | 52
 
 
Vice President of Human Resources. Ms. Hill joined the Company in February 2021 as Director, Human Resources. She was promoted to her current position in February 2022. In this role, Ms. Hill is responsible for the leadership and operations of all human resources functions, including talent acquisition, employee engagement, performance management, compensation and benefits. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Hill had more than 20 years of recruiting and human resource management experience, including human resource positions at Gannett and AOL.
 
 
 
 
2024 CEO Pay Ratio
As of December 31, 2024, Telos and its consolidated subsidiaries together had 519 employees, with 89% in the United States and 11% in the Philippines. The Company has elected to identify the median employee using our employee population as of December 31, 2024.
To identify the employee with compensation at the median of all employees for our 2024 fiscal year, the Company used the “annual rate” as reflected in our accounting systems as of December 31, 2024, for all of its employees, including part-time, and temporary employees. The annual rate for salaried employees reflects base salary paid on an annual basis, excluding the CEO. For hourly employees, the annual rate is arrived using the hourly rate and total paid hours. The Company did not make any cost-of-living adjustments despite the variety of labor markets in which our employees work, nor did it make adjustments to account for the variety of compensation arrangements used to pay employees in varying roles (e.g., the Company did not include overtime, commissions, bonuses or other types of non-fixed compensation). Using this methodology, the Company identified the median employee as a full-time salaried employee located in the United States. Once our median employee was identified, the Company calculated the median employee’s total compensation in accordance with the requirements of the Summary Compensation Table. The median employee’s annual total compensation for the 2024 fiscal year was $114,767. Annual total compensation includes base salary, leave cash-out, any applicable bonus payment, and Company contributions to the Company’s 401(k) plan on behalf of the employee.
As calculated using the methodology required for the Summary Compensation Table, the total annualized compensation of Mr. Wood was $18,082,345 and the total annual compensation of the median employee was $114,767, which yields a ratio of 158 to 1.
44

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pay Versus Performance
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Summary
Compensation
Table
Total for
PEO(1)
 
 
Compensation
Actually
Paid to
PEO(2)
 
 
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table
Total for
Non-PEO
Named
Executive
Officers(3)
 
 
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Non-PEO
Named
Executive
Officers(4)
 
 
Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based on:
 
 
Net Income
 
 
Total
Revenue
Year
 
 
Total
Shareholder
Return
 
 
Peer Group(5)
Total
Shareholder
Return
 
2024
 
 
$18,082,345
 
 
$ 7,805,464
 
 
$ 5,688,559
 
 
$ 3,023,164
 
 
$20.12
 
 
$101.94
 
 
$(52,520,000)
 
 
$108,272,000
2023
 
 
1,249,826
 
 
(12,929)
 
 
1,009,950
 
 
622,506
 
 
21.47
 
 
116.26
 
 
(34,473,000)
 
 
145,378,000
2022
 
 
10,727,344
 
 
2,383,319
 
 
4,645,884
 
 
605,348
 
 
29.94
 
 
82.91
 
 
(53,428,000)
 
 
216,887,000
2021
 
 
12,197,174
 
 
5,857,632
 
 
8,744,031
 
 
4,489,920
 
 
90.71
 
 
131.24
 
 
(43,134,000)
 
 
242,433,000
2020
 
 
3,242,786
 
 
3,242,786
 
 
1,398,079
 
 
1,398,079
 
 
194.00(6)
 
 
134.46(6)
 
 
6,841,000
 
 
179,917,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
The Principal Executive Officer (PEO) for the reporting periods is Mr. John B. Wood, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
(2)
The calculations for compensation actually paid (for both PEO and NEOs) are set forth below the footnotes to this table. The year-end fair value of certain equity awards subject to performance conditions granted in the year and outstanding and unvested at the end of the year contained a materially different assumption regarding the probability (as of year-end) of meeting the performance conditions. At grant date, the Company assumed it was probable that the conditions would be met, and at year end the assumption had changed to not probable.
(3)
The Named Executive Officers (NEOs), other than the PEO, for 2024 were Messrs. Bendza, Griffin, Robbins, and Cooke. For 2023, the NEOs were Messrs. Bendza, Griffin, and Robbins. For 2022, the NEOs were: Messrs. Bendza, Robbins, Griffin and Brendan Malloy. For 2021, the NEOs were: Messrs. Bendza, Malloy, Griffin, Edward Williams, Jefferson Wright, and Ms. Michele Nakazawa. For 2020, the NEOs were Messrs. Williams, Wright, Malloy, and Ms. Nakazawa.
(4)
Average compensation actually paid to non-PEO NEOs in 2021 and 2022 is significantly impacted by a one-time equity award to Mark Griffin in 2021, valued at $29 million at the time of grant. Mr. Griffin’s award was granted to reflect his role in the creation of value in Telos ID as reflected in its purchase price in connection with our IPO, and to align his compensation with similarly-situated Company executives.
(5)
The Peer Group consists of Agilysys, Inc., A10 Networks, Inc., Qualys, Inc., Tenable Holdings, Inc., Varonis Systems, Inc., OneSpan, Inc., Mitek Systems, Inc., PagerDuty, Inc., Rapid7, Inc., LiveRamp Holdings, Inc., PROS Holdings, Inc., and Veritone, Inc. The Peer Group used to calculate Peer Group Total Shareholder Return in the prior fiscal year (“2023 Proxy Peers”) consisted of: CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc., LiveRamp Holdings, Inc., Okta, Inc., OneSpan, Inc., Qualys, Inc., Rapid7, Inc., Tenable Holdings, Inc., Varonis Systems, Inc., and ZScaler, Inc. The Total Shareholder Return, by year, for the 2023 Proxy Peers was: 2020 - $136.67; 2021 - $148.71; 2022 - $60.44; 2023 - $114.32; 2024 - $112.18. At page 26 of this Proxy Statement, we discuss the changes made to our compensation peer group and the rationale therefore, and incorporate that discussion herein. In addition, two companies that were included in the peer group for TSR calculation in the prior fiscal year (Perficient, Inc. and SecureWorks, Inc.) were not included in the 2023 Proxy Peers because they are no longer public companies and therefore were not included as a result of the application of pre-established objective criteria (the requirement to be a publicly-traded company). Three companies that were compensation peers in 2024 (Brightcove, Inc., Model N, Inc. and SecureWorks, Inc.) were not used to calculated TSR for the same reason.
(6)
From registration date, Nov 18, 2020, until year end.
Compensation actually paid or “CAP” are amounts calculated in accordance with applicable SEC rules and do not, necessarily, correlate to the total amount of cash or equity compensation that the executive actually realized or was paid during any fiscal year. The CAP is a calculation that includes, for example, the increase (or decrease) in value of certain elements of compensation (i.e., equity compensation) over the fiscal year, even if granted in a prior year. The amounts that the executive will ultimately receive with respect to these types of compensation (i.e., when and if the equity awards vest) are likely to be different from the amounts disclosed in this Pay versus Performance disclosure.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PEO
 
 
Non-PEO NEO
 
 
 
2024
 
 
2024
Summary Compensation Table Total
 
 
$18,082,345
 
 
$5,688,559
Reported Value of Equity Awards
 
 
(17,239,419)
 
 
(5,218,312)
Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted during the Year that are Outstanding and Unvested at End of Year
 
 
6,945,244
 
 
2,549,643
Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that are Outstanding and Unvested at End of Year
 
 
—
 
 
(2,459)
Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Year
 
 
—
 
 
—
Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Year
 
 
17,294
 
 
5,733
Fair Value at the End of the Prior Year of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Covered Fiscal Year
 
 
—
 
 
—
Value of Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Stock or Option Awards Not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value or Total Compensation
 
 
—
 
 
—
Total Equity Award Adjustments
 
 
$ (10,276,881)
 
 
$ (2,665,395)
Reported Change in the Actuarial Present Value of Pension Benefits
 
 
—
 
 
—
Pension Benefit Adjustments
 
 
—
 
 
—
Compensation Actually Paid
 
 
$7,805,464
 
 
$3,023,164
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
45

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Description of the Relationship Between Pay and Performance

 
 
46

TABLE OF CONTENTS


 
Most Important Financial Performance Measures for Linking Executive Pay to Company Performance
•
Total Revenue
•
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
•
Stock Price
(1)
Both EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are supplemental measures of operating performance that are not made under GAAP and do not represent, and should not be considered as, an alternative to net loss as determined by GAAP. We define EBITDA as net (loss) income attributable to Telos, adjusted for net (loss) income attributable to non-controlling interest, non-operating (income) expense, interest expense, provision for (benefit from) income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss), adjusted for non-operating expense/(income), interest expense, provision for/(benefit from) income taxes, depreciation and amortization, restructuring expenses and stock-based compensation expense.
In the Company’s opinion, Total Revenue is the single most important financial performance measure for linking executive pay to company performance, and is therefore the company-selected measure in the Pay versus Performance table above.
47

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of the Record Date by: (i) each of our NEOs, (ii) each director, (iii) each stockholder who is known by us to beneficially own in excess of five percent and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, each stockholder listed below has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by such person. The rules of the SEC consider a person to be the “beneficial owner” of any securities over which the person has or shares voting power or investment power. Unless otherwise indicated below, the address of each stockholder is 19886 Ashburn Road, Ashburn, VA 20147.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Title of Class
 
 
Name and Address of
Beneficial Owner
 
 
Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership as of
March 17, 2025
 
 
Percent
of Class
Common Stock
 
 
The JRP Settlement
c/o Silex Trust Company Limited
Rue De La Croix D’or 7
Geneva V8 1204 Switzerland
 
 
 9,540,437 shares(A)
 
 
12.7%
Common Stock
 
 
Global X Management Company LLC
605 3rd Avenue, 43rd Floor
New York, NY 10158
 
 
 6,524,228 shares(B)
 
 
8.7%
Common Stock
 
 
BlackRock, Inc.
50 Hudson Yards
New York, NY 10001
 
 
 4,181,392 shares(C)
 
 
5.6%
Common Stock
 
 
John B. Wood
 
 
 5,993,381 shares(D)
 
 
8.0%
Common Stock
 
 
Mark Bendza
 
 
   552,708 shares(E)
 
 
0.7%
Common Stock
 
 
Mark D. Griffin
 
 
   863,802 shares(F)
 
 
1.2%
Common Stock
 
 
E. Hutchinson Robbins, Jr.
 
 
   338,488 shares(G)
 
 
0.5%
Common Stock
 
 
Malcolm G. Cooke
 
 
    88,560 shares(H)
 
 
0.1%
Common Stock
 
 
David Borland
 
 
   238,530 shares(I)
 
 
0.3%
Common Stock
 
 
Bonnie Carroll
 
 
    141,525 shares(J)
 
 
0.2%
Common Stock
 
 
Derrick D. Dockery
 
 
   134,579 shares(K)
 
 
0.2%
Common Stock
 
 
Brad Jacobs
 
 
   170,772 shares(L)
 
 
0.2%
Common Stock
 
 
John W. Maluda
 
 
   185,461 shares(M)
 
 
0.3%
Common Stock
 
 
Fredrick D. Schaufeld
 
 
 2,428,749 shares(N)
 
 
3.2%
Common Stock
 
 
All officers and directors as a group (12 persons)
 
 
11,190,438 shares(O)
 
 
14.9%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(A)
Includes 9,264,804 shares held directly by The JRP Settlement, transferred from Toxford Corporation on July 16, 2021, and 275,633 shares held directly by the estate of Mr. John R.C. Porter. According to the Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 1) jointly filed on February 8, 2022, Brian Padgett is the executor of the estate of John Porter and therefore has sole voting and investment power of the shares of Common Stock owned by the estate. Shirley Porter is the sole Protector of The JRP Settlement, can replace the Trustee and therefore has sole voting and investment power over the Common Stock held by The JRP Settlement. Silex Trust Company Limited (the “Trustee”) is the trustee of The JRP Settlement. Brian Padgett, Oliver Hemmer, and Ronan Kuczaj are the individuals who can make decisions on behalf of the Trustee and each can act alone in doing so, and therefore they have shared voting and investment power over the Common Stock held by The JRP Settlement.
(B)
According to the Schedule 13G filed on February 14, 2025, Global X Management Company LLC, located at 605 3rd Avenue, 43rd Floor, New York, NY 10158, beneficially owns 6,524,228 shares of Common Stock, of which it has sole dispositive power and sole voting power.
(C)
According to the Schedule 13G filed on November 8, 2024, BlackRock, Inc., located at 50 Hudson Yards, New York, NY 10001, beneficially owns 4,181,392 shares of Common Stock, of which it has sole dispositive power for those shares, of which it has sole voting power for 4,122,407 shares of Common Stock..
(D)
Includes 5,026,925 vested shares, 193,971 shares held for the benefit of Mr. Wood by the Telos Corporation Shared Savings Plan, and 772,485 shares held by JJJJJV, LLC, in which Mr. Wood is the principal.
(E)
Includes 326,890 vested shares, 8,483 shares held for the benefit of Mr. Bendza by the Telos Corporation Shared Savings Plan, and 217,335 restricted share units that will vest within sixty days.
(F)
Includes 674,986 vested shares, 17,870 shares held for the benefit of Mr. Griffin by the Telos Corporation Shared Savings Plan, and 170,946 restricted share units that will vest within sixty days.
(G)
Includes 204,406 vested shares, 12,422 shares held for the benefit of Mr. Robbins by the Telos Corporation Shared Savings Plan, and 121,660 restricted share units that will vest within sixty days.
(H)
Includes 59,313 vested shares, 10,750 shares held jointly with his spouse, 10,035 shares held for the benefit of Mr. Cooke by the Telos Corporation Shared Savings Plan, and 8,462 restricted share units that will vest within sixty days.
(I)
Includes 91,297 vested shares, 95,233 shares held by a trust for the benefit of Mr. Borland, and options to acquire 52,000 shares that may be exercised within sixty days.
48

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(J)
Includes 91,525 vested shares and options to acquire 50,000 shares that may be exercised within sixty days.
(K)
Includes 84,579 vested shares and options to acquire 50,000 shares that may be exercised within sixty days.
(L)
Includes 110,772 vested shares and options to acquire 60,000 shares that may be exercised within sixty days.
(M)
Includes 135,020 vested shares, 441 shares held jointly with his spouse, and options to acquire 50,000 shares that may be exercised within sixty days.
(N)
Includes 149,297 vested shares, 1,594,147 shares held in a trust for the benefit of Mr. Schaufeld, 250,000 shares held by FDS New River Farm 2017 Irrevocable Trust in which Mr. Schaufeld is the Settlor, 181,498 shares held in River Farm Investments LLC, an investment vehicle for Mr. Schaufeld’s self-directed IRA, and 253,807 shares held by three irrevocable trusts, one for each of his children, of which Mr. Schaufeld is the Settlor.
(O)
Includes 10,153,223 vested shares held in aggregate by the executive officers and directors. Also includes 249,140 shares held in aggregate by the Telos Corporation Shared Savings Plan for the benefit of the executive officers, options to acquire 262,000 shares that may be exercised within sixty days held in the aggregate by the directors, and 526,075 restricted share units that will vest within sixty days held in aggregate by executive officers.
49

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Stockholder Proposals for the 2026 Annual Meeting
Stockholders who wish to have proposals for the Company’s 2026 annual meeting of stockholders included in the proxy materials for such meeting must submit these proposals to the Company on or prior to November 28, 2025. All other proposals (including director nominations) must be submitted in accordance with the process set forth in the Company’s Bylaws, which provide that, in order for business to be properly brought before an annual meeting by a stockholder, the stockholder must deliver written notice to the Company’s secretary at the Company’s principal executive offices not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event that the date of the annual meeting is advanced by more than 30 days or delayed by more than 60 days from such anniversary date, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so delivered not earlier than the 90th day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 60th day prior to such annual meeting or the tenth day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made.
Delinquent Section 16 Reports
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 requires officers, directors and beneficial owners of more than 10% of any class of our equity securities to file reports, including reports of changes in ownership of the Company’s registered equity securities, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports so filed. Based on a review of the copies of reports received and written representations from our reporting persons, we believe that all forms required to be filed under Section 16(a) were filed on a timely basis, with the exception of one Form 4 filing reporting on one transaction for Victoria Harding in March 2024 due to an inadvertent administrative oversight.
Other Matters
Neither the Board of Directors nor management intends to bring any matter for action at the Annual Meeting other than those matters described above. If any other matter or any proposal should be presented and should properly come before the meeting for action, the persons named in the accompanying proxy will vote upon such matter and upon such proposal in accordance with their best judgment.
50

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Exhibit A
 
Amendment No. 1 to the
Telos Corporation Amended and Restated
2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan
Telos Corporation, a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), hereby amends the Telos Corporation Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), effective as of the date this Amendment is approved by the stockholders of the Company (the “Amendment Effective Date”), as follows:
Section 2.10 of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
“Corporate Transaction” means (i) the dissolution or liquidation of the Company, (ii) during any period of (12) consecutive months, a majority of the members of the Board of Directors is replaced by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the Board of Directors before the date of the appointment or election, (iii) a sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company to another person or entity which does not constitute a “related person” to the Company, as such term is defined in the Treasury Regulations issued in connection with Section 409A of the Code, or (iv) any transaction (including without limitation a merger, consolidation or reorganization in which the Company is the surviving entity) which results in any person or entity (other than any employee benefit plan sponsored or maintained by the Company or the surviving entity) owning more than 50% of the combined voting power of all outstanding voting securities of the Company, the surviving entity, or the ultimate parent entity that directly or indirectly has more than 50% of the combined voting power of all outstanding voting securities of the Company or the surviving entity (the “Parent Company”) entitled to vote in the election of directors, unless immediately following such transaction more than 50% of the of the combined voting power of the outstanding voting securities of the Company, the surviving entity, or the Parent Company entitled to vote in the election of directors is represented by the Shares that were outstanding immediately prior to such transaction (or, if applicable, is represented by securities into which the Shares that were outstanding immediately prior to such transaction were converted pursuant to such transaction), and such voting power among the holders thereof is in substantially the same proportion as the voting power of the outstanding Shares among the holders thereof immediately prior to such transaction.
Section 4 of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 17 hereof, the number of Shares available for issuance under the Plan shall be, in the aggregate, twenty-six million eight hundred fifty-nine thousand nine hundred thirteen (26,859,913). Shares issued or to be issued under the Plan shall be authorized but unissued Shares or issued Shares that have been reacquired by the Company. If any Shares covered by an Award are not purchased or are forfeited, or if an Award otherwise terminates without delivery of Shares subject thereto, then the number of Shares counted against the aggregate number of Shares available under the Plan with respect to such Award shall, to the extent of any such forfeiture or termination, again be available for making Awards under the Plan. If an Award (other than a Dividend Equivalent Right) is denominated in Shares, including Share-settled Awards where all or a portion of the Award may be settled in cash, the number of Shares covered by such Award, or to which such Award relates, shall be counted on the date of grant of such Award against the aggregate number of Shares available for granting Awards under the Plan. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, Shares subject to an Award under the Plan may not again be made available for issuance under the Plan if such Shares are (i) Shares delivered to, tendered as payment for, or withheld by the Company to pay the exercise price or cover the withholding taxes under the Award, or (ii) Shares subject to a vested Option or Share Appreciation Right that are not actually issued in connection with the settlement of such Option or Share Appreciation Right. In addition, Shares repurchased by the Company using Option exercise proceeds may not again be made available for issuance under the Plan.
The Board shall have the right to issue Substitute Awards or assume Awards in connection with mergers, reorganizations, separations, or other transactions to which Section 424(a) of the Code applies. The number of Shares reserved pursuant to Section 4 may be increased by the corresponding number of Awards assumed and, in the case of a Substitute Award, by the net increase in the number of Shares subject to Awards before and after the substitution.
Except as amended by this Amendment, the Plan is hereby ratified in all respects and remains in full effect.
[Signature on Following Page]
51

TABLE OF CONTENTS

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment on behalf of the Company as of the Amendment Effective Date.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TELOS CORPORATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Helen M. Oh
Corporate Secretary
 
 
 
 
52

TABLE OF CONTENTS


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS


 
DEF 14A 0000320121 false 0000320121 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000320121 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000320121 2022-01-01 2022-12-31 0000320121 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0000320121 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0000320121 tls:OneTimeEquityAwardMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember tls:MarkGriffinMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0000320121 ecd:EqtyAwrdsInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:PeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000320121 ecd:EqtyAwrdsInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000320121 ecd:YrEndFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdInCvrdYrOutsdngAndUnvstdMember ecd:PeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000320121 ecd:YrEndFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdInCvrdYrOutsdngAndUnvstdMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000320121 ecd:ChngInFrValOfOutsdngAndUnvstdEqtyAwrdsGrntdInPrrYrsMember ecd:PeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000320121 ecd:ChngInFrValOfOutsdngAndUnvstdEqtyAwrdsGrntdInPrrYrsMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000320121 ecd:VstngDtFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdAndVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:PeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000320121 ecd:VstngDtFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdAndVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000320121 ecd:ChngInFrValAsOfVstngDtOfPrrYrEqtyAwrdsVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:PeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000320121 ecd:ChngInFrValAsOfVstngDtOfPrrYrEqtyAwrdsVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000320121 ecd:FrValAsOfPrrYrEndOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdInPrrYrsFldVstngCondsDrngCvrdYrMember ecd:PeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000320121 ecd:FrValAsOfPrrYrEndOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdInPrrYrsFldVstngCondsDrngCvrdYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000320121 ecd:DvddsOrOthrErngsPdOnEqtyAwrdsNtOthrwsRflctdInTtlCompForCvrdYrMember ecd:PeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000320121 ecd:DvddsOrOthrErngsPdOnEqtyAwrdsNtOthrwsRflctdInTtlCompForCvrdYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000320121 ecd:EqtyAwrdsAdjsMember ecd:PeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000320121 ecd:EqtyAwrdsAdjsMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000320121 ecd:AggtChngPnsnValInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:PeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000320121 ecd:AggtChngPnsnValInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000320121 ecd:AggtPnsnAdjsSvcCstMember ecd:PeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000320121 ecd:AggtPnsnAdjsSvcCstMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000320121 1 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000320121 2 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000320121 3 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 iso4217:USD
v3.25.1
Cover
 12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2024
Document Information [Line Items]  
Document Type DEF 14A
Amendment Flag false
Entity Information [Line Items]  
Entity Registrant Name TELOS CORPORATION
Entity Central Index Key 0000320121
v3.25.1
Pay vs Performance Disclosure - USD ($)
 12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2024
Dec. 31, 2023
Dec. 31, 2022
Dec. 31, 2021
Dec. 31, 2020
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure, Table
Pay Versus Performance
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Summary
Compensation
Table
Total for
PEO(1)
 
 
Compensation
Actually
Paid to
PEO(2)
 
 
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table
Total for
Non-PEO
Named
Executive
Officers(3)
 
 
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Non-PEO
Named
Executive
Officers(4)
 
 
Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based on:
 
 
Net Income
 
 
Total
Revenue
Year
 
 
Total
Shareholder
Return
 
 
Peer Group(5)
Total
Shareholder
Return
 
2024
 
 
$18,082,345
 
 
$ 7,805,464
 
 
$ 5,688,559
 
 
$ 3,023,164
 
 
$20.12
 
 
$101.94
 
 
$(52,520,000)
 
 
$108,272,000
2023
 
 
1,249,826
 
 
(12,929)
 
 
1,009,950
 
 
622,506
 
 
21.47
 
 
116.26
 
 
(34,473,000)
 
 
145,378,000
2022
 
 
10,727,344
 
 
2,383,319
 
 
4,645,884
 
 
605,348
 
 
29.94
 
 
82.91
 
 
(53,428,000)
 
 
216,887,000
2021
 
 
12,197,174
 
 
5,857,632
 
 
8,744,031
 
 
4,489,920
 
 
90.71
 
 
131.24
 
 
(43,134,000)
 
 
242,433,000
2020
 
 
3,242,786
 
 
3,242,786
 
 
1,398,079
 
 
1,398,079
 
 
194.00(6)
 
 
134.46(6)
 
 
6,841,000
 
 
179,917,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
The Principal Executive Officer (PEO) for the reporting periods is Mr. John B. Wood, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
(2)
The calculations for compensation actually paid (for both PEO and NEOs) are set forth below the footnotes to this table. The year-end fair value of certain equity awards subject to performance conditions granted in the year and outstanding and unvested at the end of the year contained a materially different assumption regarding the probability (as of year-end) of meeting the performance conditions. At grant date, the Company assumed it was probable that the conditions would be met, and at year end the assumption had changed to not probable.
(3)
The Named Executive Officers (NEOs), other than the PEO, for 2024 were Messrs. Bendza, Griffin, Robbins, and Cooke. For 2023, the NEOs were Messrs. Bendza, Griffin, and Robbins. For 2022, the NEOs were: Messrs. Bendza, Robbins, Griffin and Brendan Malloy. For 2021, the NEOs were: Messrs. Bendza, Malloy, Griffin, Edward Williams, Jefferson Wright, and Ms. Michele Nakazawa. For 2020, the NEOs were Messrs. Williams, Wright, Malloy, and Ms. Nakazawa.
(4)
Average compensation actually paid to non-PEO NEOs in 2021 and 2022 is significantly impacted by a one-time equity award to Mark Griffin in 2021, valued at $29 million at the time of grant. Mr. Griffin’s award was granted to reflect his role in the creation of value in Telos ID as reflected in its purchase price in connection with our IPO, and to align his compensation with similarly-situated Company executives.
(5)
The Peer Group consists of Agilysys, Inc., A10 Networks, Inc., Qualys, Inc., Tenable Holdings, Inc., Varonis Systems, Inc., OneSpan, Inc., Mitek Systems, Inc., PagerDuty, Inc., Rapid7, Inc., LiveRamp Holdings, Inc., PROS Holdings, Inc., and Veritone, Inc. The Peer Group used to calculate Peer Group Total Shareholder Return in the prior fiscal year (“2023 Proxy Peers”) consisted of: CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc., LiveRamp Holdings, Inc., Okta, Inc., OneSpan, Inc., Qualys, Inc., Rapid7, Inc., Tenable Holdings, Inc., Varonis Systems, Inc., and ZScaler, Inc. The Total Shareholder Return, by year, for the 2023 Proxy Peers was: 2020 - $136.67; 2021 - $148.71; 2022 - $60.44; 2023 - $114.32; 2024 - $112.18. At page 26 of this Proxy Statement, we discuss the changes made to our compensation peer group and the rationale therefore, and incorporate that discussion herein. In addition, two companies that were included in the peer group for TSR calculation in the prior fiscal year (Perficient, Inc. and SecureWorks, Inc.) were not included in the 2023 Proxy Peers because they are no longer public companies and therefore were not included as a result of the application of pre-established objective criteria (the requirement to be a publicly-traded company). Three companies that were compensation peers in 2024 (Brightcove, Inc., Model N, Inc. and SecureWorks, Inc.) were not used to calculated TSR for the same reason.
(6)
From registration date, Nov 18, 2020, until year end.
Compensation actually paid or “CAP” are amounts calculated in accordance with applicable SEC rules and do not, necessarily, correlate to the total amount of cash or equity compensation that the executive actually realized or was paid during any fiscal year. The CAP is a calculation that includes, for example, the increase (or decrease) in value of certain elements of compensation (i.e., equity compensation) over the fiscal year, even if granted in a prior year. The amounts that the executive will ultimately receive with respect to these types of compensation (i.e., when and if the equity awards vest) are likely to be different from the amounts disclosed in this Pay versus Performance disclosure.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PEO
 
 
Non-PEO NEO
 
 
 
2024
 
 
2024
Summary Compensation Table Total
 
 
$18,082,345
 
 
$5,688,559
Reported Value of Equity Awards
 
 
(17,239,419)
 
 
(5,218,312)
Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted during the Year that are Outstanding and Unvested at End of Year
 
 
6,945,244
 
 
2,549,643
Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that are Outstanding and Unvested at End of Year
 
 
—
 
 
(2,459)
Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Year
 
 
—
 
 
—
Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Year
 
 
17,294
 
 
5,733
Fair Value at the End of the Prior Year of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Covered Fiscal Year
 
 
—
 
 
—
Value of Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Stock or Option Awards Not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value or Total Compensation
 
 
—
 
 
—
Total Equity Award Adjustments
 
 
$ (10,276,881)
 
 
$ (2,665,395)
Reported Change in the Actuarial Present Value of Pension Benefits
 
 
—
 
 
—
Pension Benefit Adjustments
 
 
—
 
 
—
Compensation Actually Paid
 
 
$7,805,464
 
 
$3,023,164
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
        
Company Selected Measure Name Total Revenue        
Named Executive Officers, Footnote
(1)
The Principal Executive Officer (PEO) for the reporting periods is Mr. John B. Wood, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
(3)
The Named Executive Officers (NEOs), other than the PEO, for 2024 were Messrs. Bendza, Griffin, Robbins, and Cooke. For 2023, the NEOs were Messrs. Bendza, Griffin, and Robbins. For 2022, the NEOs were: Messrs. Bendza, Robbins, Griffin and Brendan Malloy. For 2021, the NEOs were: Messrs. Bendza, Malloy, Griffin, Edward Williams, Jefferson Wright, and Ms. Michele Nakazawa. For 2020, the NEOs were Messrs. Williams, Wright, Malloy, and Ms. Nakazawa.
       
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote
(5)
The Peer Group consists of Agilysys, Inc., A10 Networks, Inc., Qualys, Inc., Tenable Holdings, Inc., Varonis Systems, Inc., OneSpan, Inc., Mitek Systems, Inc., PagerDuty, Inc., Rapid7, Inc., LiveRamp Holdings, Inc., PROS Holdings, Inc., and Veritone, Inc. The Peer Group used to calculate Peer Group Total Shareholder Return in the prior fiscal year (“2023 Proxy Peers”) consisted of: CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc., LiveRamp Holdings, Inc., Okta, Inc., OneSpan, Inc., Qualys, Inc., Rapid7, Inc., Tenable Holdings, Inc., Varonis Systems, Inc., and ZScaler, Inc. The Total Shareholder Return, by year, for the 2023 Proxy Peers was: 2020 - $136.67; 2021 - $148.71; 2022 - $60.44; 2023 - $114.32; 2024 - $112.18. At page 26 of this Proxy Statement, we discuss the changes made to our compensation peer group and the rationale therefore, and incorporate that discussion herein. In addition, two companies that were included in the peer group for TSR calculation in the prior fiscal year (Perficient, Inc. and SecureWorks, Inc.) were not included in the 2023 Proxy Peers because they are no longer public companies and therefore were not included as a result of the application of pre-established objective criteria (the requirement to be a publicly-traded company). Three companies that were compensation peers in 2024 (Brightcove, Inc., Model N, Inc. and SecureWorks, Inc.) were not used to calculated TSR for the same reason.
       
Changed Peer Group, Footnote
(5)
The Peer Group consists of Agilysys, Inc., A10 Networks, Inc., Qualys, Inc., Tenable Holdings, Inc., Varonis Systems, Inc., OneSpan, Inc., Mitek Systems, Inc., PagerDuty, Inc., Rapid7, Inc., LiveRamp Holdings, Inc., PROS Holdings, Inc., and Veritone, Inc. The Peer Group used to calculate Peer Group Total Shareholder Return in the prior fiscal year (“2023 Proxy Peers”) consisted of: CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc., LiveRamp Holdings, Inc., Okta, Inc., OneSpan, Inc., Qualys, Inc., Rapid7, Inc., Tenable Holdings, Inc., Varonis Systems, Inc., and ZScaler, Inc. The Total Shareholder Return, by year, for the 2023 Proxy Peers was: 2020 - $136.67; 2021 - $148.71; 2022 - $60.44; 2023 - $114.32; 2024 - $112.18. At page 26 of this Proxy Statement, we discuss the changes made to our compensation peer group and the rationale therefore, and incorporate that discussion herein. In addition, two companies that were included in the peer group for TSR calculation in the prior fiscal year (Perficient, Inc. and SecureWorks, Inc.) were not included in the 2023 Proxy Peers because they are no longer public companies and therefore were not included as a result of the application of pre-established objective criteria (the requirement to be a publicly-traded company). Three companies that were compensation peers in 2024 (Brightcove, Inc., Model N, Inc. and SecureWorks, Inc.) were not used to calculated TSR for the same reason.
       
PEO Total Compensation Amount $ 18,082,345 $ 1,249,826 $ 10,727,344 $ 12,197,174 $ 3,242,786
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount $ 7,805,464 (12,929) 2,383,319 5,857,632 3,242,786
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote
Compensation actually paid or “CAP” are amounts calculated in accordance with applicable SEC rules and do not, necessarily, correlate to the total amount of cash or equity compensation that the executive actually realized or was paid during any fiscal year. The CAP is a calculation that includes, for example, the increase (or decrease) in value of certain elements of compensation (i.e., equity compensation) over the fiscal year, even if granted in a prior year. The amounts that the executive will ultimately receive with respect to these types of compensation (i.e., when and if the equity awards vest) are likely to be different from the amounts disclosed in this Pay versus Performance disclosure.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PEO
 
 
Non-PEO NEO
 
 
 
2024
 
 
2024
Summary Compensation Table Total
 
 
$18,082,345
 
 
$5,688,559
Reported Value of Equity Awards
 
 
(17,239,419)
 
 
(5,218,312)
Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted during the Year that are Outstanding and Unvested at End of Year
 
 
6,945,244
 
 
2,549,643
Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that are Outstanding and Unvested at End of Year
 
 
—
 
 
(2,459)
Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Year
 
 
—
 
 
—
Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Year
 
 
17,294
 
 
5,733
Fair Value at the End of the Prior Year of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Covered Fiscal Year
 
 
—
 
 
—
Value of Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Stock or Option Awards Not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value or Total Compensation
 
 
—
 
 
—
Total Equity Award Adjustments
 
 
$ (10,276,881)
 
 
$ (2,665,395)
Reported Change in the Actuarial Present Value of Pension Benefits
 
 
—
 
 
—
Pension Benefit Adjustments
 
 
—
 
 
—
Compensation Actually Paid
 
 
$7,805,464
 
 
$3,023,164
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
        
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount $ 5,688,559 1,009,950 4,645,884 8,744,031 1,398,079
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount $ 3,023,164 622,506 605,348 4,489,920 1,398,079
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote
Compensation actually paid or “CAP” are amounts calculated in accordance with applicable SEC rules and do not, necessarily, correlate to the total amount of cash or equity compensation that the executive actually realized or was paid during any fiscal year. The CAP is a calculation that includes, for example, the increase (or decrease) in value of certain elements of compensation (i.e., equity compensation) over the fiscal year, even if granted in a prior year. The amounts that the executive will ultimately receive with respect to these types of compensation (i.e., when and if the equity awards vest) are likely to be different from the amounts disclosed in this Pay versus Performance disclosure.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PEO
 
 
Non-PEO NEO
 
 
 
2024
 
 
2024
Summary Compensation Table Total
 
 
$18,082,345
 
 
$5,688,559
Reported Value of Equity Awards
 
 
(17,239,419)
 
 
(5,218,312)
Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted during the Year that are Outstanding and Unvested at End of Year
 
 
6,945,244
 
 
2,549,643
Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that are Outstanding and Unvested at End of Year
 
 
—
 
 
(2,459)
Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Year
 
 
—
 
 
—
Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Year
 
 
17,294
 
 
5,733
Fair Value at the End of the Prior Year of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Covered Fiscal Year
 
 
—
 
 
—
Value of Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Stock or Option Awards Not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value or Total Compensation
 
 
—
 
 
—
Total Equity Award Adjustments
 
 
$ (10,276,881)
 
 
$ (2,665,395)
Reported Change in the Actuarial Present Value of Pension Benefits
 
 
—
 
 
—
Pension Benefit Adjustments
 
 
—
 
 
—
Compensation Actually Paid
 
 
$7,805,464
 
 
$3,023,164
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
        
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return        
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income        
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure        
Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group        
Tabular List, Table
Most Important Financial Performance Measures for Linking Executive Pay to Company Performance
•
Total Revenue
•
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
•
Stock Price
(1)
Both EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are supplemental measures of operating performance that are not made under GAAP and do not represent, and should not be considered as, an alternative to net loss as determined by GAAP. We define EBITDA as net (loss) income attributable to Telos, adjusted for net (loss) income attributable to non-controlling interest, non-operating (income) expense, interest expense, provision for (benefit from) income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss), adjusted for non-operating expense/(income), interest expense, provision for/(benefit from) income taxes, depreciation and amortization, restructuring expenses and stock-based compensation expense.
In the Company’s opinion, Total Revenue is the single most important financial performance measure for linking executive pay to company performance, and is therefore the company-selected measure in the Pay versus Performance table above.
       
Total Shareholder Return Amount $ 20.12 21.47 29.94 90.71 194
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount 101.94 116.26 82.91 131.24 134.46
Net Income (Loss) $ (52,520,000) $ (34,473,000) $ (53,428,000) $ (43,134,000) $ 6,841,000
Company Selected Measure Amount 108,272,000 145,378,000 216,887,000 242,433,000 179,917,000
PEO Name Mr. John B. Wood Mr. John B. Wood Mr. John B. Wood Mr. John B. Wood Mr. John B. Wood
Previous Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount $ 112.18 $ 114.32 $ 60.44 $ 148.71 $ 136.67
Measure:: 1          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name Total Revenue        
Measure:: 2          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name Adjusted EBITDA        
Non-GAAP Measure Description
(1)
Both EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are supplemental measures of operating performance that are not made under GAAP and do not represent, and should not be considered as, an alternative to net loss as determined by GAAP. We define EBITDA as net (loss) income attributable to Telos, adjusted for net (loss) income attributable to non-controlling interest, non-operating (income) expense, interest expense, provision for (benefit from) income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss), adjusted for non-operating expense/(income), interest expense, provision for/(benefit from) income taxes, depreciation and amortization, restructuring expenses and stock-based compensation expense.
       
Measure:: 3          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name Stock Price        
PEO | Aggregate Change in Present Value of Accumulated Benefit for All Pension Plans Reported in Summary Compensation Table          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount $ 0        
PEO | Aggregate Pension Adjustments Service Cost          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 0        
PEO | Equity Awards Adjustments          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (10,276,881)        
PEO | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (17,239,419)        
PEO | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 6,945,244        
PEO | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 0        
PEO | Vesting Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 0        
PEO | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 17,294        
PEO | Prior Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Any Prior Year that Fail to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 0        
PEO | Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Total Compensation for Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 0        
Non-PEO NEO | Aggregate Change in Present Value of Accumulated Benefit for All Pension Plans Reported in Summary Compensation Table          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 0        
Non-PEO NEO | Aggregate Pension Adjustments Service Cost          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 0        
Non-PEO NEO | Equity Awards Adjustments          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (2,665,395)        
Non-PEO NEO | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (5,218,312)        
Non-PEO NEO | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 2,549,643        
Non-PEO NEO | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (2,459)        
Non-PEO NEO | Vesting Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 0        
Non-PEO NEO | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 5,733        
Non-PEO NEO | Prior Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Any Prior Year that Fail to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 0        
Non-PEO NEO | Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Total Compensation for Covered Year          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount $ 0        
Non-PEO NEO | Mark Griffin [Member] | One-Time Equity Award [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       $ 29,000,000  
v3.25.1
Award Timing Disclosure
 12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2024
Award Timing Disclosures [Line Items]  
Award Timing MNPI Disclosure
Statement Concerning the Timing of Stock Option Grants
Our 2016 LTIP provides the Compensation Committee with the discretion to issue stock options, but the Company does not have a policy concerning the timing of stock option grants. The 2016 LTIP does prohibit the back-dating of options. The Company did not issue any stock options in 2024, and has no specific practice concerning the timing thereof; however, the Company does not time the disclosure of material nonpublic information to affect the value of executive compensation.
Award Timing Method Our 2016 LTIP provides the Compensation Committee with the discretion to issue stock options, but the Company does not have a policy concerning the timing of stock option grants. The 2016 LTIP does prohibit the back-dating of options.
Award Timing, How MNPI Considered The Company did not issue any stock options in 2024, and has no specific practice concerning the timing thereof; however, the Company does not time the disclosure of material nonpublic information to affect the value of executive compensation.
MNPI Disclosure Timed for Compensation Value false
v3.25.1
Insider Trading Policies and Procedures
 12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2024
Insider Trading Policies and Procedures [Line Items]  
Insider Trading Policies and Procedures Adopted true
Grafico Azioni Telos (NASDAQ:TLS)
Storico
Da Mar 2025 a Apr 2025 Clicca qui per i Grafici di Telos
Grafico Azioni Telos (NASDAQ:TLS)
Storico
Da Apr 2024 a Apr 2025 Clicca qui per i Grafici di Telos