TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No.  )
Filed by the Registrant ☒
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant 
Check the appropriate box:
Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
 
 
No fee required.
 
 
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 
 
Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.


TABLE OF CONTENTS



Union Pacific Corporation
1400 Douglas Street, 19th Floor
Omaha, NE 68179
March 25, 2025
NOTICE OF
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Date
Thursday
May 8, 2025
Time
7:00 A.M.
Central Daylight Time
Place
via live audio webcast at
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/UNP2025
Record Date
March 14, 2025
Close of Business

Your vote is very important. New York Stock Exchange rules provide that if your shares are held by a broker, your broker is NOT permitted to vote your shares on most matters presented at the Annual Meeting, including the election of directors, and may elect not to vote your shares at all, unless you provide voting instructions to your broker. We strongly encourage you to submit your proxy card to your broker or utilize your broker’s telephone or internet voting services (if available) and exercise your right to vote as a shareholder.


To Shareholders:
The 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the Annual Meeting) of Union Pacific Corporation (the Company) will be held at 7:00 A.M., Central Daylight Time, on Thursday, May 8, 2025, via live audio webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/UNP2025 for the following purposes:
1
To elect the eleven directors named in the Proxy Statement, each to serve for a term of one year or until his or her successor is elected and qualified;
2
To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for 2025;
3
To approve, by non-binding vote, the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers;
4
To consider and vote upon one shareholder proposal if properly presented at the Annual Meeting; and
 
To transact such other businesses as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.
Only shareholders of record at the close of business on March 14, 2025, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy card are being distributed and made available to shareholders of the Company on March 25, 2025.
You may listen to the live audio webcast of the Annual Meeting via the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/UNP2025. Instructions on how to participate in the Annual Meeting via live audio webcast are described in the accompanying Proxy Statement and posted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/UNP2025.

Craig V. Richardson
Executive Vice President,
Chief Legal Officer and
Corporate Secretary

TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION
PROXY STATEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Proxy Statement includes statements and information regarding future expectations, outcomes or results of the Company that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements and information should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times that, or by which, such performance, targets, goals, or results will be achieved. Forward-looking statements and information are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements. Forward-looking statements and information reflect the good faith consideration by management of currently available information and may be based on underlying assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, such information and assumptions (and, therefore, such forward-looking statements and information) are or may be subject to variables or unknown or unforeseeable events or circumstances over which management has little or no influence or control and may be derived from internal controls and processes that continue to evolve and standards for measuring progress that are still developing. Factors that could cause results or outcomes to differ, including the risk factors in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Form 10-K, filed February 7, 2025, also could affect our future results and could cause those results or other outcomes to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements and information. This Proxy Statement should be read in consideration of these risk factors. Information included in this document, and any issues identified as important for purposes of this document, may not be considered material for SEC reporting purposes. Website references and/or hyperlinks have been provided for convenience only, and the contents therein are not incorporated into, nor do they constitute a part of, this document.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Proxy Summary
This summary highlights information that may be contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider. You should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.
Meeting Information and Availability of Proxy Materials
Date and Time: May 8, 2025, at 7:00 A.M., Central Daylight Time
Place: Via live audio webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/UNP2025
Record Date: March 14, 2025
How to Vote
We encourage you to vote in advance of the meeting. You may vote using one of the following voting methods. Make sure to have your proxy card or voting instruction form in hand and follow the instructions. Participants in Union Pacific’s thrift and retirement plans who hold Company stock through such plans will receive separate voting instructions. You can vote in one of three ways:
 
RECORD OWNERS
BENEFICIAL HOLDERS

Vote via the Internet
Go to www.proxyvote.com
Follow the instructions set forth on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or the voting instruction form provided by your broker with these proxy materials.

Vote by telephone
Call toll free 1-800-690-6903 within the USA, US territories & Canada

Vote by Mail
Complete, sign, date and return your proxy card in the envelope provided
 
Voting Matters and Board Recommendations
Matter
Our Board’s Recommendations
Proposal 1
Election of eleven (11) Director Nominees (page 14)
FOR Each Director Nominee
Proposal 2
Ratification of Appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2025 (page 39)
FOR
Proposal 3
Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (page 41)
FOR
Proposal 4
Shareholder Proposal Requesting an Amended Clawback Policy (page 82)
AGAINST
1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Proxy Summary
Company Performance Highlights
Safety, Service, and Operational Excellence supports the Company’s long-term initiative to grow its freight volumes. Together as a team, we are focused on achieving the best safety record in the industry and being known for superior service, grounded in operational excellence which, in turn, drives growth.
Safety. 2024 was a transformational year on our journey to becoming the safest railroad. Our strategy is focused on four pillars, Injury Prevention, Leverage Technology, Situational Awareness Testing, and Peer-to-Peer Engagement, as more fully described in the 2024 Business Highlights section on page 44. The focus on these four pillars is driving results. For 2024, our personal injury rate (the number of reportable injuries for every 200,000 employee-hours worked) was down by 23% and our derailment incident rate (the number of reportable derailment incidents per million train miles) was down 20% compared to 2023.
Service. Service Performance Index (SPI) (a ratio of the service customers are currently receiving relative to the best monthly performance over the last three years) for both intermodal and manifest products improved 2 and 4 points, respectively, compared to 2023. Throughout the year, we improved network fluidity as reflected in 2% faster freight car velocity and record terminal dwell which improved 3% from 2023.
Operational Excellence. Network performance throughout 2024 was strong. While we experienced some powerful weather events in the second quarter and a second half unexpected surge in international intermodal shipments, most of our operating metrics improved year-over-year. We maintained a resource buffer that allowed us to strategically integrate crews, locomotives, and freight cars into the network to efficiently handle the growth and recover from the weather events.
Union Pacific was the only Class I railroad to be named a Sustainability Yearbook Member by S&P Global. This recognition and our repeated inclusion in the JUST Capital 100 demonstrates our continued commitment to sustainability.
Highlights of the Company's 2024 financial and operational performance include:
For the full year 2024, net income was
$6.7 BILLION
or $11.09 per diluted share, up 6%
compared to full year 2023 net income of
$6.4 billion or $10.45 per diluted share
Our reportable
personal injury rate of
0.90
per 200,000 employee-hours
improved 23% from 2023
Our reportable
derailment incident rate of
2.17
improved 20% from 2023
 
 
 
Operating revenue of
$24.3 BILLION
was up 1% driven by increased volume and core pricing gains, partially offset by lower fuel surcharge revenue, unfavorable
business mix, and lower other revenue.

Operating income of
$9.7 BILLION
increased 7% from 2023
Our operating ratio for 2024 was
59.9%
Improving 2.4 points from 2023

Freight car velocity improved
2%
and average terminal dwell improved
3%
compared to 2023

Service Performance Index (SPI)
IMPROVED
compared to 2023. Intermodal SPI
improved 2 points in 2024 at the same time international volume surged, and Manifest SPI improved 4 points
Locomotive productivity improved
5%
in 2024 compared to 2023 driven
by improved network fluidity and
asset utilization

Workforce productivity improved
6%
in 2024 as average daily car miles
increased 2% and average employees decreased 4% compared to 2023
2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Proxy Summary
Sustainability Highlights
We build America by connecting the nation’s businesses and communities to each other and the world by providing safe, reliable and efficient transportation solutions. To do this effectively, we are reinforcing our focus on our strategy of Safety + Service & Operational Excellence = Growth. This means providing faster and more efficient service and being productive and responsive to our customers and all stakeholders. We strive to serve our customers, enhance shareholder value, invest in our communities, and provide promising careers, while operating in an ethical manner.
Our environmental, social and governance strategy, Building a Sustainable Future 2030, is built on five areas of concentration:
BUILDING RESPONSIBLE FOUNDATIONS


Union Pacific understands the importance of health, safety and well-being, business ethics and conduct, cybersecurity and risk management and internal control.
STRENGTHENING OUR COMMUNITIES


Union Pacific is dedicated to serving and investing in communities, improving the quality of life where our employees live and work. We pride ourselves on being a good corporate citizen and a champion for diverse suppliers.
INVESTING IN OUR WORKFORCE


At Union Pacific, we are committed to fostering an inclusive culture that reflects the diverse markets and communities we serve. We provide comprehensive benefits and training programs to support our employees' growth and provide equal pay for equal work.
CHAMPIONING ENVIRONMENTAL
STEWARDSHIP


Union Pacific is committed to working
to address the impacts of climate
change and to reduce absolute Scope 1,
Scope 2, and Scope 3 categories
1, 2 & 3 GHG emissions 50.4% by
2030 from a 2018 base year.
DRIVING SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS


Rail is the most fuel-efficient way to
move freight over land, cutting
GHG emissions by up to 75%
compared to commercial trucks.
Our goal is to capitalize on this
advantage and offer customers a
more environmentally-friendly form
of freight transportation.
How We Disclose Our Sustainability Progress
Last year, we updated our sustainability disclosure strategy, combining our three separate reports (The Climate Action Plan, We Are One Report, and the Building America Report) into one consolidated report, the Building America Report, covering our sustainability initiatives. Combining our sustainability disclosures and data in one report makes it easier for stakeholders to locate, bolstering our commitment to transparency.
Union Pacific is transitioning to publishing The Building America Report every other year instead of annually. However, we remain committed to transparency and will continue to provide annual updates on our sustainability data metrics to keep stakeholders informed of our ongoing progress and initiatives.
To guide our sustainability disclosures, we reference several reporting standards and frameworks, including the Global Reporting Initiative’s (GRI) reporting standards, the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB). Environmental disclosures also incorporate the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework.
For more information on our Building a Sustainable Future 2030 strategy, please see our 2023 Building America Report and our Sustainability Metrics on our website, up.com, under the Investor drop-down menu, under “Sustainability.”
3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Proxy Summary
Sustainability Governance
The Board of Directors provides oversight of our sustainability strategy. The Corporate Governance, Nominating and Sustainability Committee is responsible for reviewing current developments in sustainability and recommends adoption of new, or modifications to existing practices, policies, and procedures. To oversee and guide the appropriate management of sustainability, we have established the following governance structure:

4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Proxy Summary
RECOGNITIONS
We take pride in our dedication to transparently sharing our sustainability strategies and data through various disclosure initiatives. We are honored to have received several awards, rankings, and recognitions over the past year, including:


Union Pacific earned a spot on the List of 2024 Top 50 Companies for Workplace Fairness compiled by Fair360. Union Pacific also landed a spot on Fair360 Top 50 list for Veterans.

Union Pacific earned a spot as a Global Sustainability Yearbook Member, underscoring its sustainable leadership in the industry.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Disability:IN recognized Union Pacific as a Best Place to Work for Disability Inclusion in 2024.

Union Pacific was awarded the Industry Partnership Award from the Clean Fuels Alliance for our ongoing collaboration fueling the rail industry’s growing interest in sustainable fuel solutions.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Union Pacific earned a spot on the America’s Most Just Companies List and was named an Industry Leader by Just Capital.


For the eighth year in a row, Union Pacific was identified as a Trendsetter in the 2024 CPA-Zicklin Index compiled by the Center for Political Accountability.
 
 
 
 


Union Pacific earned top marks – and a top spot – on the Human Rights Campaign’s Best Places to Work list for LGBTQ+ Equality.

Union Pacific ranked 23rd among the Top 100 Inspiring Workplaces in North America.
Visit our Awards & Accolades Webpage for the full list at www.up.com/media/media_kit/awards/index.htm.
5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Proxy Summary
ENVIRONMENTAL
Union Pacific is committed to protecting the environment now and for future generations through our efforts in evaluating and improving our environmental management systems and operating efficiency while developing and investing in technology to reduce our environmental footprint. We are dedicated to sustainability and providing safe, reliable, fuel-efficient and environmentally responsible freight transportation for our customers.
2024 Environmental Highlights Include:
Customer Emission Tracking
We are overhauling our emissions tracking process to allow customers to monitor their Scope 3 emissions for shipments with Union Pacific. Instead of basing this information on high-level industry averages, we will instead be tracking various relevant metrics to calculate emissions down to an individual shipment level.
Hybrid Locomotives
Union Pacific is investing in hybrid locomotives as part of its commitment to sustainability and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The first of these locomotives, developed in collaboration with ZTR, was deployed in 2024. They work by combining traditional diesel engines with battery power to improve fuel efficiency and lower emissions.
Locomotive Modernizations
In 2024, we modernized 160 older locomotives and plan to modernize an additional 240 locomotives in 2025 through 2026. These modernizations are estimated to provide approximately 350 tons of carbon reduction per locomotive per year, and the total order for 600 locomotives is expected to realize approximately 210,000 tons in annual emission reduction.
Renewable Diesel and Biofuels
Increasing our utilization of renewable fuels is a key lever in our decarbonization initiatives. In 2024, Union Pacific became the first Class 1 railroad to join the Clean Fuels Alliance and received the Clean Fuels Alliance's Industry Partnership Award. Our year-end total utilization of biofuels for 2024 was 5.2%.
The Nature Conservancy Partnership Update
Our partnership with The Nature Conservancy to support three separate nature-based solutions projects based in Nebraska, California and Texas officially launched in 2023 and continued throughout 2024. Project goals include grassland and wetland restoration, groundwater recharge, threatened species habitat conservation and community education.
SOCIAL
Investing in our Workforce is one of the five areas of concentration in our Building a Sustainable Future 2030 strategy. We are dedicated to providing an environment where employees feel valued, engaged and inspired.
2024 Social Highlights Include:
EAP Benefits Upgrade
Our Employee Assistance Program (EAP) now covers all employees and eligible dependents, including domestic partners, regardless of their healthcare plan or if they opt out of Union Pacific's coverage. This enhanced benefit provides up to six cost-free counseling sessions with a master's level licensed counselor. This support aims to promote the overall well-being and quality of life for Union Pacific employees and their families.
Maternity Leave Enhancement
Union Pacific has enhanced its maternity leave policy, increasing paid maternity leave for birth mothers from eight to twelve weeks. This change underscores our commitment to supporting our employees and their families.
How We Win Together
Last year, Union Pacific launched its How We Win Together Training. This training provides an interactive experience to build every employee’s understanding of the industry, focusing on strategic priorities. To date, more than 30,000 employees have successfully completed the training.
Retention and Employee Voice
With retention of nearly 90%, Union Pacific strives to create an environment where everyone has the opportunity to succeed. UP uses a third-party confidential survey platform to track its culture. Last year, engagement increased 5 points, manager effectiveness increased 11 points and belonging increased 6 points.
Safety Culture Assessment
In 2024, we conducted a comprehensive Safety Culture Assessment, gathering feedback from thousands of field employees through surveys, focus groups, and listening sessions. This initiative, supported by a neutral third-party company, identified numerous improvement opportunities, including enhanced training protocols and resource optimization.
Please refer to the 2023 Building America Report for additional information and details. The report is available on our website, up.com, under the Investor drop-down menu, under “Sustainability.”
6

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Proxy Summary
GOVERNANCE
The Company’s commitment to strong corporate governance, effective risk management and independent oversight of management by the Board is reflected in our sound governance practices and policies.
2024 Governance Highlights Include:
Board Composition and Board Meeting Attendance
Board Nominees composed of 91% Independent Directors (10 of 11 Board Nominees)
Six (6) Diverse Board members/Nominees for Election (55%)
Board Meeting attendance of 100%
Board Refreshment
Commitment to Board Refreshment (Six Directors with tenure of 5 years or less, 55% of current composition, all of which are standing for election)
Board Nominees have average Board Tenure of 5.4 years
Board Leadership and Board Committees
Independent Board Chairman
Five Board Committees - Audit Committee, Compensation and Talent Committee, Corporate Governance, Nominating and Sustainability Committee, Finance Committee and Safety and Service Quality Committee - composed solely of independent directors
Executive Sessions of Independent Directors at each Board and Committee Meeting
Annual evaluation of Board and Committee performance
Governance Practices and Oversight
Annual Election of Directors with Majority Voting Standard
“Proxy Access” Right
Board Strategic Oversight and Review of Enterprise Risk Management
Regular Succession Planning for the CEO and executive management levels
Stringent Director and Executive Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines (7x Annual Salary for CEO and 4x Salary for other Named Executive Officers)
Policy against pledging and hedging Company common stock

Note: These statistics reflect the tenure, independence and diversity of the eleven director nominees.
7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Proxy Summary
Shareholder Engagement
It has been our longstanding practice to meet with shareholders throughout the year so that management and the Board can better understand shareholder perspectives on governance, executive compensation, and other topics.
We believe that engagement with our shareholders is an important part of our Company’s success and we have an active shareholder engagement program. Our shareholder engagement efforts help us to better understand our shareholders’ priorities and concerns and enable the Company to most effectively address issues important to our shareholders. Our Investor Relations team regularly meets with investors and investment analysts. Our head of Investor Relations communicates topics discussed and shareholder feedback to senior management and the Board for consideration in their decision-making.
In 2024, as part of our regular shareholder engagement, management participated in 9 investor conferences, over 80 virtual or in-person investor meetings and hosted more than 400 conference calls with investors and analysts.



In September 2024, we hosted our first in-person investor day in over six years for a group of over 100 investors and analysts.

We engaged with investors on various topics, including:

Company safety, operational and financial performance

Succession planning and governance

Strategic planning

​Talent management and culture

Sustainability

Shareholder proposals
Our annual say-on-pay vote is an opportunity to receive feedback from shareholders regarding our executive compensation program. Shareholders demonstrated strong support for our executive compensation program in 2024 as evidenced by the approximately 96% of votes cast in favor of say-on-pay at our 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. We believe that the executive compensation decisions made in 2024 and described in this Proxy Statement benefit shareholders and continue to align with our strategy and pay-for-performance philosophy.
8

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Proxy Summary
Executive Compensation Highlights
In 2024, seventy-six percent (76%) of the target compensation opportunity provided to Mr. Vena and sixty-five percent (65%) of the target compensation opportunity provided to the other Named Executive Officers (NEOs) was in the form of long-term incentive (LTI) equity awards
2024 LTI awards granted in February consisted of sixty percent (60%) performance stock units and forty percent (40%) stock options
Performance stock unit awards granted in 2024 were based:
two-thirds (2/3) on the average annual return on invested capital (ROIC) for a three-year performance period (Performance Period); and
one-third (1/3) on the Company’s operating income growth (OIG) over the Performance Period as compared to the OIG of the companies in the S&P 100 Industrials Index and the Class I Railroads
In 2024, our formula-based annual incentive plan was based:
seventy percent (70%) on the attainment of specified Company financial performance goals (equally weighted between operating income and operating ratio);
twenty percent (20%) on the Company’s performance against pre-established strategic business objectives;
five percent (5%) on the attainment of specified reportable personal injury rate goals; and
five percent (5%) on the attainment of specified reportable derailment rate goals


Under our formula-based annual incentive plan, performance for 2024 resulted in a payment of 163% of target for each of the NEOs as a result of achieving above target operating income and operating ratio performance and above target safety performance as reflected by both our reportable personal injury rate and reportable derailment rate, as well as meeting or exceeding most strategic scorecard objectives
Based on our three-year average ROIC of 16.2% and our relative OIG at the 65th percentile, performance stock units for the three-year performance period (2022-2024) ending in 2024 vested at 90% of target
The compensation earned in 2024 by Mr. Vena and the other NEOs, as described in the CD&A section of this Proxy Statement, reflects our policy of tying a significant portion of our executives’ compensation to annual and long-term Company performance
9

TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION
1400 Douglas Street, 19th Floor
Omaha, NE 68179

PROXY STATEMENT
FOR
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 8, 2025
INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING, VOTING AND PROXIES
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy
Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to Be Held on May 8, 2025
This Proxy Statement and our 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at www.up.com under the
“Investors” caption link by selecting “Annual Reports/Form 10-Ks/Proxy”
investor.unionpacific.com/financials/annual-reports.
Shareholders may also request a copy of this Proxy Statement and our 2024 Annual Report
on Form 10-K by emailing investor.relations@up.com or by calling (402) 544-4227.
Date, Time and Place of Meeting
This Proxy Statement is being furnished to shareholders of Union Pacific Corporation (the Company) in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of the Company (the Board) for use in voting at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders or any adjournment or postponement thereof (the Annual Meeting). The Annual Meeting will be held on Thursday, May 8, 2025, at 7:00 A.M., Central Daylight Time, via live audio webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/UNP2025. This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy card are being distributed and made available to shareholders of the Company on March 25, 2025.
Record Date, Outstanding Shares and Quorum
Only holders of record of the Company’s common stock at the close of business on March 14, 2025 (the Record Date), will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, we had 599,318,180 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. If a majority of the shares outstanding on the Record Date are present and entitled to vote on any matter at the Annual Meeting, we will have a quorum at the Annual Meeting. Any shares represented by proxies that are marked for, against or to abstain from voting on a proposal will be counted as present for the purpose of determining whether there is a quorum.
Internet Availability of Proxy Materials
We are using the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rule that allows companies to furnish their proxy materials over the Internet. As a result, we are mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials. All shareholders receiving the notice will have the ability to access the proxy materials over the Internet and may request to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a paper copy may be found in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. In addition, the notice contains information on how you may request access to proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically on an ongoing basis.
Accessing Proxy Materials over the Internet
Your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, proxy card or voting instruction card will contain instructions on how to:
View our proxy materials for the Annual Meeting on the Internet; and
Instruct us to send our future proxy materials to you electronically by email or the Internet.
10

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING, VOTING AND PROXIES
Our proxy materials will be available for shareholders of record during the voting period at www.proxyvote.com. From this website, you also will be able to vote prior to the Annual Meeting. To access this website, you will need your 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.
Your Notice of Internet Availability, proxy card or voting instruction card will contain instructions on how you access our proxy materials electronically and, if you currently receive paper copies of these materials, how you may request proxy materials electronically on an ongoing basis. Choosing to access your future proxy materials electronically will help us conserve natural resources and reduce the costs of distributing our proxy materials.
Voting Rights
Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each full share held as of the Record Date.
Under Proposal Number 1, directors will be elected by a majority of the votes cast by the shares of common stock present at the Annual Meeting (either in person or by proxy) on the election of directors, which means that a nominee will be elected if he or she receives more “for” votes than “against” votes. Pursuant to Section 9 of Article I of the Company’s Bylaws and applicable laws of the State of Utah, a nominee who does not receive more “for” votes than “against” votes will be elected to a shortened term expiring on the earlier of: (i) 90 days after the day on which the Company certifies the voting results; or (ii) the day on which a person is selected by the Board to fill the office held by the director.
Approval of Proposal Number 2 (ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm), Proposal Number 3 (advisory vote to approve executive compensation), and Proposal Number 4 (shareholder proposal requesting an amended clawback policy) requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal (either in person or by proxy).
If your shares are held in a street name (that is, through a broker, bank, trustee, nominee or other holder of record), you are considered a beneficial owner of those shares. As the beneficial owner of those shares, you have the right to direct your broker, bank, trustee, nominee or other holder of record how to vote. If you do not provide voting instructions to your broker in advance of the Annual Meeting, your broker is not permitted to vote on certain proposals and may elect not to vote on any of the proposals. If you do not provide voting instructions and the broker elects to vote your shares on some but not all matters, it will result in a “broker non-vote” for the matters on which the broker does not vote. Accordingly, in order for your shares to be voted on all proposals, we encourage you to provide voting instructions to your broker as described in these proxy materials.
The Board recommends that you vote FOR each of the nominees in Proposal Number 1 and FOR Proposal Numbers 2 and 3, and AGAINST Proposal Number 4.
Although the advisory vote on Proposal Number 3 is non-binding, the Board will review the results of the vote, and consistent with the Company’s strong record of shareholder engagement, will take them into account when making determinations concerning executive compensation.
In accordance with Utah law, abstentions and broker non-votes are not treated as votes cast and, therefore, are not counted in determining which directors are elected under Proposal Number 1 or in determining the outcome on Proposal Numbers 2, 3 and 4.
Solicitation and Voting of Proxies
Whether you hold shares directly as a shareholder of record or in street name (that is, through a broker, bank, trustee, nominee or other holder of record), you may direct how your shares are voted without participating in the Annual Meeting. There are three ways to vote by proxy:
Via the Internet — Shareholders who have received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by mail may submit proxies over the Internet by following the instructions on the notice. Shareholders who have received proxy materials by email may submit proxies over the Internet by following the instructions included in the email. Shareholders who have received a paper copy of a proxy card or voting instruction card by mail may submit proxies over the Internet by following the instructions on the proxy card or voting instruction card.
By Telephone — Shareholders of record who live in the United States or Canada may submit proxies by telephone by calling 1-800-690-6903 and following the instructions. Shareholders of record who have received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by mail must have the control number that appears on their notice available when voting. Shareholders of record who have received a proxy card by mail must have the control number that appears on their proxy card available when voting. Shareholders who hold shares in street name who have received proxy materials by email must have the control number included in the email available when voting.
11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING, VOTING AND PROXIES
By Mail — Shareholders who have received a paper copy of a proxy card or voting instruction card by mail may submit proxies by completing, signing and dating their proxy card or voting instruction card and mailing it in the accompanying pre-addressed envelope.
If you sign and return your proxy card but do not give any voting instructions, your shares will be voted “FOR” the election of each of the director nominees listed in Proposal Number 1 below, “FOR” Proposal Number 2, “FOR” Proposal Number 3, and “AGAINST” Proposal Number 4. To our knowledge, no other matters will be presented at the Annual Meeting. However, if any other matters of business are properly presented, the proxy holders named on the proxy card are authorized to vote the shares represented by proxies according to their judgment.
Confidential Voting Policy
The Board maintains a confidential voting policy pursuant to which Broadridge Financial Services, Inc. (Broadridge) receives shareholder proxies or voting instructions, and representatives of Broadridge, serving as independent inspectors of the election, certify the vote. Proxies, as well as telephone and Internet voting instructions, will be kept confidential from management (except in certain cases where it may be necessary to meet legal requirements, including a contested proxy solicitation or where a shareholder writes comments on the proxy card). Reports concerning the vote may be made available to the Company, provided such reports do not reveal the vote of any particular shareholder.
Revocation of Proxies
After you submit your proxy you may revoke it at any time before voting takes place at the Annual Meeting. You can revoke your proxy in two ways: (i) deliver to the Secretary of the Company a written notice, dated later than the proxy you want to revoke, stating that the proxy is revoked or (ii) submit new telephone or Internet instructions or deliver a validly executed later-dated proxy. For this purpose, communications to the Secretary of the Company should be addressed to Union Pacific Corporation, 1400 Douglas Street, 19th Floor, Omaha, Nebraska 68179 and must be received before the time that the proxy you wish to revoke is voted at the Annual Meeting. Please note that if your shares are held in street name (that is, a broker, bank, trustee, or nominee or other holder of record holds your shares on your behalf) and you wish to revoke a previously granted proxy, you must contact that entity and submit new voting instructions to your broker, bank, trustee, nominee or other holder of record. You may also revoke your proxy by attending and voting during the Annual Meeting before the polls are closed.
Expenses of Solicitation
The Company will pay the entire cost of preparing, printing, mailing and distributing the notices and proxy materials and soliciting votes. In addition to the mailing of the notices and proxy materials, proxies may be solicited by personal interview, telephone and electronic communication by the directors, officers and employees of the Company acting without special compensation. We also make arrangements with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for the forwarding of solicitation material to the street name holders of shares held of record by such individuals, and the Company will reimburse such custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in connection with such solicitation. In addition, the Company engaged Morrow Sodali, LLC, 333 Ludlow Street, Stamford, CT 06902, to solicit proxies on its behalf. The anticipated fees of Morrow Sodali LLC are approximately $20,000, plus certain other customary fees and expenses.
Attending the Annual Meeting
This year’s Annual Meeting is being held solely by means of remote communication, and shareholders may not physically attend the meeting. Shareholders of record as of the record date may attend, participate in, vote at, and listen to the Annual Meeting via live audio webcast via the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/UNP2025 when you enter your 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the Annual Meeting via the live audio webcast are posted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/UNP2025. If your shares are held in street name and your voting instruction form or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials indicates that you may vote those shares through the www.proxyvote.com website, then you may access, participate in, and vote at the Annual Meeting with the 16-digit control number indicated on that voting instruction form or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. Otherwise, shareholders who hold their shares in street name should contact their bank, broker, or other nominee (preferably at least 5 days before the Annual Meeting) and obtain a “legal proxy” in order to be able to attend, participate in, or vote at the Annual Meeting.
12

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING, VOTING AND PROXIES
Access to the meeting will begin approximately 15 minutes before the scheduled meeting time, and you are encouraged to log on early to test your access. If you have technical problems accessing the Annual Meeting, you may contact the technical support number that will be posted on the virtual shareholder meeting log-in page.
Shareholders will be provided an opportunity to ask questions in advance of and during the Annual Meeting. We will only respond to questions that relate to the Company or the matters being presented at the Annual Meeting, and that otherwise comply with the rules of conduct that will be posted on the Annual Meeting website. We may group similar questions together and present a combined response. In the event that we are not able to respond to all proper questions that are submitted during the meeting, we will post responses on our Investor Relations website as soon as practical following the Annual Meeting.
Information Regarding the Company
References to the Company’s website included in this Proxy Statement and in the Company’s 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K are provided as a convenience and do not constitute, and should not be deemed, an incorporation by reference of the information contained in, or available through, the website.
13

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NUMBER 1 – Election of Directors
The Board currently consists of twelve members. At the recommendation of the Corporate Governance, Nominating and Sustainability Committee, the Board has nominated Mses. Edison, Finley, Hopkins and Lute and Messrs. Dillon, McCarthy, Simons, Tien, Vena, Wiehoff and Williams for election as directors. Due to Mr. DeLaney’s retirement, the Board will be reduced to eleven directors as of the Annual Meeting.
Each of the eleven nominees currently serve as a director of the Company. Each of the nominees has consented to being named as a nominee and to serve if elected. If any nominee(s) for director for any reason becomes unavailable for election, it is intended that discretionary authority will be exercised by the persons named in the enclosed proxy in respect of the election of such other person(s) as the Board shall nominate.
Thanks to Our Retiring Director. William J. DeLaney, a valued member of our Board, will retire from the Board at the Annual Meeting and will not stand for re-election. Mr. DeLaney’s tenure was marked by his leadership and significant contributions to the Board’s Audit, Compensation & Talent, and Safety & Service Quality Committees. The Board wishes to thank Mr. DeLaney for his years of dedicated service and work on behalf of the Company and its shareholders.
Vote Required for Approval
Directors will be elected by a majority of the votes cast by the shares present at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors, which means that a nominee will be elected if he or she receives more “for” votes than “against” votes. Pursuant to Section 9 of Article I of the Company’s Bylaws and applicable laws of the State of Utah, if a nominee does not receive more “for” votes than “against” votes, he or she will be elected to a shortened term that terminates on the earlier of: (i) 90 days after the day on which the Company certifies the voting results; or (ii) the day on which a person is selected by the Board to fill the office held by the director.
The Board recommends a vote FOR the election of each of the nominated directors.
Directors/Nominees
The following identifies the Company’s nominees for election to the Board. Each of the nominees currently serves as a director and was last elected by shareholders at the 2024 Annual Meeting. Each nominee, if elected, will serve for a term of one year or until his or her successor is elected and qualified.
 

DAVID B. DILLON
 
 
AGE: 74 | DIRECTOR SINCE: 2014 | INDEPENDENT
Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The Kroger Co.
Audit
(Chair)
Corporate
Governance,
Nominating &
Sustainability
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXPERIENCE
SKILLS & QUALIFICATIONS
 
 
 
Chairman of the Board (2004 – 2014), Chief Executive
Officer (2003 – 2013), President (1995 – 2003), and Executive
Vice President (1990 – 1995); The Kroger Co., a leading retailer operating supermarket and multi-department stores
President (1986 – 1995), joined in 1976 and advanced through various management positions; Dillon Companies, Inc. (a subsidiary of The Kroger Co.)
OTHER PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS (within the last 5 years)
CURRENT
3M Company (since 2015)
CEO Experience – gained as a result of his role as
Chief Executive Officer of Kroger
Risk Management Experience, Operations Knowledge,
Customer Perspective, Economics/Finance Expertise
developed during his roles at Kroger and Dillon where he
demonstrated the ability to understand complex logistics
operations, as well as having skills in financial audit matters
Publicly Traded Company Experience – gained through his
service as CEO of Kroger, as well as his extensive experience
serving on the boards of other public companies
Legal Expertise and the Investor Perspective – gained
through his legal education (J.D., Southern Methodist
University) and service as a CEO leading a public company
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NUMBER 1 – Election of Directors
 

SHERI H. EDISON
 
AGE: 68 | DIRECTOR SINCE: 2021 | INDEPENDENT
Former Executive Vice President and
General Counsel Amcor plc
Compensation
& Talent
Corporate
Governance,
Nominating &
Sustainability
(Chair)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXPERIENCE
SKILLS & QUALIFICATIONS
 
 
 
Executive Vice President and General Counsel (2019 – 2021); Amcor plc, a global packaging company
Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary
(2017 – 2019 when it was acquired by Amcor), Vice
President, General Counsel and Secretary (2010 – 2016);
Bemis Company, Inc., a global packaging company
Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer (2007 – 2010), Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary (2004 – 2007); Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc, a global medical device company
Began her career as an attorney in private practice
OTHER PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS (within the last 5 years)
CURRENT
Cardinal Health, Inc. (since 2020)
FORMER
AK Steel (2014 – 2020)
Legal Expertise, Government and Regulatory Expertise,
International/Global Expertise – developed through her
experience as a general counsel and her service in other
functional leadership roles at publicly traded manufacturing
companies in the medical device and packaging industries
Risk Management Experience – gained during her legal roles
and involvement in enterprise risk management at Amcor,
Bemis and Hill-Rom
Publicly Traded Company Experience – gained through her
valuable experience serving on the boards of other public
companies.
Customer Perspective and the Investor Perspective
developed through her leadership and general counsel
roles at publicly traded manufacturing companies in the
medical device and packaging industries with significant
operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

TERESA M. FINLEY
 
AGE: 63 | DIRECTOR SINCE: 2022 | INDEPENDENT
Former Chief Marketing and Business Services
Officer United Parcel Service, Inc.
Interim Chief Financial Officer TriMas Corporation
Audit
Finance
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXPERIENCE
SKILLS & QUALIFICATIONS
 
 
 
Interim Chief Financial Officer (2025 – present); TriMas Corporation, a diversified manufacturer of engineered products that serve a variety of industrial, commercial and consumer end markets worldwide
Senior Advisor (2019 – 2021); Boston Consulting Group, a global management consulting firm
Chief Marketing and Business Services Officer (2015 – 2017), Treasurer & Vice President of Finance (2014 – 2014), Corporate Controller (2010 – 2013), Chief Financial Officer of International Package & Global Forwarding & Logistics (2007 – 2010), Vice President, Investor Relations (2003 – 2007), joined in 1984; United Parcel Service, Inc., a global package delivery company and leading provider of specialized transportation logistics services
OTHER PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS (within the last 5 years)
CURRENT
TriMas Corporation (since 2020)
Economics/Finance Expertise, Operations Knowledge,
International/Global Expertise, Customer Perspective,
Investor Perspective – developed during her time at UPS
where she gained a deep understanding of how finance,
investor relations, marketing, technology, and pricing
operates in a complex organization that is at the center of
global supply chains and logistics operations
Risk Management Experience – gained in her roles at UPS
and Boston Consulting
Publicly Traded Company Experience – gained through her
public board experience
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NUMBER 1 – Election of Directors
 

DEBORAH C. HOPKINS
 
AGE: 70 | DIRECTOR SINCE: 2017 | INDEPENDENT
Former Chief Executive Officer Citi Ventures and
Former Chief Innovation Officer Citi
Compensation
& Talent
Finance
(Chair)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXPERIENCE
SKILLS & QUALIFICATIONS
 
 
 
Chief Executive Officer, Citi Ventures (2008 – 2016), Chief Innovation Officer (2008 – 2016), Chief Operations and Technology Officer (2005 – 2008), Senior Advisor to Corporate and Investment Bank and Head of Corporate Strategy (2003 – 2005); Citigroup, Inc., a global investment bank and financial services corporation
Chief Financial Officer (2000 – 2001), Lucent Technologies
Chief Financial Officer (1998 – 2000), The Boeing Company
Vice President of Finance, Europe (1997 – 1998),
General Auditor (1995 – 1997); General Motors Company
Corporate Controller (1982 – 1995), Unisys Corporation
OTHER PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS (within the last 5 years)
CURRENT
Bridge Investment Group Holdings Inc. (since 2021)
Marsh and McLennan Companies (since 2017)
FORMER
Compass Digital Acquisition Corp. (2021 – 2023)
Virtusa Corporation (2018 – 2021)
Qlik Technologies Inc. (2011 – 2016)
CEO Experience – gained as CEO of Citi Ventures
Economics/Finance Expertise, Wall Street Experience,
Technology/Cyber Experience, Operations Knowledge,
International/Global Expertise – developed during her
various leadership positions at multinational companies
overseeing finance, technology and innovation
Publicly Traded Company Experience – gained through her
extensive experience serving on the boards of other public
companies, including DuPont, in addition to those listed to
the left
Risk Management Experience and the Investor
Perspective – developed through her several leadership
roles at publicly traded companies
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
16

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NUMBER 1 – Election of Directors
 

JANE H. LUTE
 
AGE: 68 | DIRECTOR SINCE: 2016 | INDEPENDENT
Strategic Director
SICPA, North America
Corporate
Governance,
Nominating &
Sustainability
Safety &
Service Quality
(Chair)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXPERIENCE
SKILLS & QUALIFICATIONS
 
 
 
Strategic Director (2021 – present), President and Chief Executive Officer (2017 – 2021); SICPA, North America, a
global provider of security inks
Special Advisor to the Secretary – General (2016 – 2022);
United Nations, an intergovernmental organization
Director (2015 – present), Chief Executive Officer (2015 – 2016); Center for Internet Security (CIS), an operating nonprofit organization focused on developing cyberdefense best practices and home of the Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center providing cyber security services for state, local, tribal and territorial governments
Deputy Secretary (2009 – 2013); U.S. Department of Homeland Security; functioning as the Chief Operating Officer for the third-largest department in the U.S. government
Led the United Nations Department of Field Support; several other senior leadership roles in UN Peacekeeping and Peacebuilding (2003 – 2009)
Served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the United Nations Foundation and Better World Fund
Served on the National Security Council Staff under Presidents George H.W. Bush and William Jefferson Clinton
Served in the United States Army (1978 – 1994)
OTHER PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS (within the last 5 years)
CURRENT
Shell plc (since 2021)
Marsh and McLennan Companies (since 2020)
FORMER
Atlas Worldwide Holdings, Inc. (2018 – 2021)
CEO Experience, International/Global Expertise,
Government and Regulatory Expertise, Risk Management
Expertise – gained through her extensive military and
government service, including her service at the U.S.
Department of Homeland Security and global operational and
logistics experience at the United Nations
Technology/Cyber Expertise – developed through her role
as Chief Executive Officer of CIS, which focuses on
technology, and specifically on cybersecurity
Publicly Traded Company Experience – gained as an
experienced board director, having served on the boards
of large-market capitalization companies since 2016
Legal Expertise – gained through her legal education
(J.D., Georgetown University)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
17

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NUMBER 1 – Election of Directors
 

MICHAEL R. MCCARTHY
 
AGE: 73 | DIRECTOR SINCE: 2008 | INDEPENDENT | CHAIRMAN
Chairman McCarthy Group, LLC and Chairman
Bridges Trust Company
Corporate
Governance,
Nominating &
Sustainability
Finance
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXPERIENCE
SKILLS & QUALIFICATIONS
 
 
 
Chairman and Co-Founder (1986 – present); McCarthy Group, LLC, a private investment group
Chairman (2025 – present), Co- Chairman (2021 – 2024); Bridges Trust Company, a wealth management firm
OTHER PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS (within the last 5 years)
FORMER
Cabela’s Incorporated (1996 – 2017)
CEO Experience, Risk Management Experience – gained
through founding and serving as Chairman of McCarthy
Group and serving as Co-Chairman of Bridges Trust, both
successful investment companies
Economics/Finance Expertise, Wall Steet Experience,
International/Global Expertise – developed while providing
strategic and operational advice to businesses in various
sectors of the economy
Publicly Traded Company Experience – gained through his
significant experience serving on the boards of other public
companies
Operations Knowledge, Customer Perspective, and
Government and Regulatory Expertise – developed while
providing operational advice to businesses in various sectors
of the economy
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

DOYLE R. SIMONS
 
AGE: 61 | DIRECTOR SINCE: 2023 | INDEPENDENT
Former President and Chief Executive Officer
Weyerhaeuser Company
Compensation
& Talent
Safety &
Service Quality
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXPERIENCE
SKILLS & QUALIFICATIONS
 
 
 
President and Chief Executive Officer (2013 – 2019);
Weyerhaeuser Company, a global producer of wood-related
products and pioneer of sustainable tree farms
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (2008 – 2012), held a
variety of high-level leadership roles after joining in 1992,
including Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative
Officer (1992 – 2012); Temple-Inland, Inc. (acquired by
International Paper Company in 2012), a corrugated packaging
and building products company
Began his career as an attorney in private practice
OTHER PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS (within the last 5 years)
CURRENT
Fiserv, Inc. (since 2007)
Iron Mountain Incorporated (since 2020)
FORMER
Weyerhaeuser Company (2012 – 2019)
CEO Experience – gained through his service as a CEO of
Weyerhaeuser and Temple-Inland
Risk Management Experience, International/Global
Expertise, Operations Knowledge, Customer
Perspective – developed during his roles at Weyerhaeuser
and Temple-Inland where he became well versed in global and
complex supply chain operations and financial matters
Publicly Traded Company Experience – gained through his
service as CEO of Weyerhaeuser and Temple-Inland, as well as
his extensive experience serving on the boards of other public
companies
Legal Expertise and Investor Perspective – gained through
his legal education and practice of law (J.D., University of
Texas) and service as a CEO leading public companies
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
18

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NUMBER 1 – Election of Directors
 

JOHN K. TIEN, JR.
 
AGE: 61 | DIRECTOR SINCE: 2023 | INDEPENDENT
Former Deputy Secretary
U. S. Department of Homeland Security
Audit
Finance
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXPERIENCE
SKILLS & QUALIFICATIONS
 
 
 
Deputy Secretary (2021 – 2023), U.S. Department of Homeland Security; functioning as the Chief Operating Officer for the third-largest department in the U.S. government
Senior Executive Roles (2011 – 2021); including Chief Administrative Officer and Chief of Staff for Citi’s Global Consumer Operations and Technology organization (2011 – 2013), Head of Operations and Customer Service for Citi Retail Services’ largest Mastercard co-brand portfolio (2013-2016), Chief Operating Officer and Chief Technology Officer (2016 – 2020) for Macy’s private label and co-brand credit card portfolio for Citi Retail Services, and Head of Business and Process Re-Engineering Transformation for Citigroup’s entire U.S. Consumer Bank (2020 – 2021); Citigroup Inc., a global consumer bank
Senior Director, Afghanistan and Pakistan (2009 – 2011), National Security Council, The White House
Director, Iraq (2008 – 2009), National Security Council, The White House
White House Fellow (1998 – 1999), Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, The White House
Served in the U.S. Army (1987 – 2011); served over 24 years in positions of increasing responsibility as an officer in the U.S. Army retiring at the rank of Colonel
OTHER PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS (within the last 5 years)
CURRENT
Science Applications International Corp. (since 2024)
International/Global Expertise – developed through
his extensive military and government service, including his
service at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and
National Security Council positions
Government and Regulatory Expertise – gained through
his government service and senior executive roles at
Citigroup including experience with banking regulations
and oversight of regulatory training for the organization
Risk Management Experience – developed though his many
leadership roles in the financial sector at Citigroup which
included oversight of risk management and compliance
systems and responsibility for customer service
and safeguarding customer accounts against fraud and
data breaches
Technology/Cyber Expertise – gained through his service
at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and his various
leadership positions at Citigroup overseeing technology
operations
Publicly Traded Company Experience – gained through
serving on boards of public companies
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
19

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NUMBER 1 – Election of Directors
 

V. JAMES VENA
 
AGE: 66 | DIRECTOR SINCE: 2023 | MANAGEMENT
Chief Executive Officer
Union Pacific Corporation and Union Pacific Railroad Company
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXPERIENCE
SKILLS & QUALIFICATIONS
 
 
 
Chief Executive Officer (2023 – present), Senior Advisor to the Chairman (2021); Union Pacific Corporation
Chief Executive Officer (2023 – present), Chief Operating Officer
(2019 – 2020); Union Pacific Railroad Company
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (2013 – 2016); several senior leadership roles during his 40 years of service; Canadian National Railway Company
OTHER PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS (within the last 5 years)
FORMER
FedEx ( 2022 – 2023)
CEO Experience, Risk Management Experience and
Government and Regulatory Expertise– gained through
service as CEO of the Company and the Railroad and his
extensive experience in the rail industry where oversight and
management of regulatory matters and risks related to
safety, operations, and compliance are key
International/Global Expertise, Operations Knowledge,
Customer Perspective – developed through his over 40 years
of experience in the railroad industry, including his
service as the Chief Operating Officer of both Canadian
National and Union Pacific, as well as marketing experience
through senior roles in marketing and sales at
Canadian National
Publicly Traded Company Experience – gained through
serving on boards of public companies
Economics/Finance Expertise and Investor Perspective
developed through his service in senior leadership roles at
public companies
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

JOHN P. WIEHOFF
 
 
AGE: 63 | DIRECTOR SINCE: 2023 | INDEPENDENT
Former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Audit
Safety &
Service Quality
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXPERIENCE
SKILLS & QUALIFICATIONS
 
 
 
Chairman (2007 – 2020), President and Chief Executive Officer (2002 – 2019), President (1999 – 2002), and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (1998 – 1999); C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., a leading third-party logistics, supply chain management and sourcing company
Began his career at Arthur Andersen LLP
OTHER PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS (within the last 5 years)
CURRENT
Polaris (since 2007)
U.S. Bancorp (since 2020)
FORMER
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (2001 – 2020)
Donaldson Company, Inc. (2003 – 2022)
CEO Experience, Risk Management Experience,
International/Global Expertise, Operations Knowledge,
Customer Perspective – gained while serving as Chief
Executive Officer of C.H. Robinson and through multiple
leadership roles involving logistics, sourcing and supply chain
management
Economics/Finance Expertise – developed while serving as
C.H. Robinson’s Chief Financial Officer
Publicly Traded Company Experience –gained through
service as Chairman and CEO at C.H. Robinson and his
significant experience serving on boards of other public
companies
Investor Perspective – developed through his
service as a CFO and CEO leading a public company
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
20

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NUMBER 1 – Election of Directors
 

CHRISTOPHER J. WILLIAMS
 
AGE: 67 | DIRECTOR SINCE: 2019 | INDEPENDENT
Chairman
Siebert Williams Shank & Co.
Audit
Finance
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXPERIENCE
SKILLS & QUALIFICATIONS
 
 
Chairman (2019 – present); Siebert Williams Shank & Co., LLC, an investment banking and financial services company
Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (1994 – 2019 when merged with Siebert Cisneros Shank & Co., LLC);
Williams Capital, an investment banking and financial services firm comprised of The Williams Capital Group, L.P. and Williams Capital Management, LLC
Held positions at Jeffries and Company and Lehman Brothers
OTHER PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS (within the last 5 years)
CURRENT
Ameriprise Financial (since 2016)
The Clorox Company (since 2015)
FORMER
Caesars Entertainment Corporation (2003 – 2019)
CEO Experience – developed during his role as Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of Williams Capital
Economics/Finance Expertise, Wall Street Experience
gained during his years of experience in investment banking
and finance
Publicly Traded Company Experience – gained through his
significant experience serving on the boards of other public
companies, including, in addition to those listed at the left,
Walmart Inc.
Risk Management Experience and the Investor
Perspective – developed through service as a CEO of an
investment banking and financial services company
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
21

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NUMBER 1 – Election of Directors
Director Nominee’s Qualifications and Experience
The Corporate Governance, Nominating and Sustainability Committee considered the character, experience, qualifications and skills of each director nominee when determining whether he or she should serve as a director of the Company. Consistent with the stated criteria for director nominees described on page 23 below and included in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and Policies, the Committee determined that each director nominee exhibits a high degree of integrity, has significant professional accomplishments, and has proven leadership experience. Each director nominee is or has been a leader in his or her respective field and brings diverse talents and perspectives to the Board. The Committee also considered the experience and qualifications that each director nominee brings to the Board outlined above in each director’s biographical information, as well as service on boards of other public companies.
The Committee utilizes the following list of skills and qualifications identified in the table below that are particularly relevant to the Company when evaluating director nominees, both from an individual and collective standpoint. The fact that a particular skill or qualification is not designated does not mean the director nominee does not possess that particular attribute. Rather, the skills and qualifications noted below are those reviewed by the Corporate Governance, Nominating and Sustainability Committee and the Board in making nomination decisions and as part of the Board succession planning process. We believe the combination of the skills and qualifications shown below demonstrates how the Board is well-positioned to provide strategic oversight and guidance to management.

22

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NUMBER 1 – Election of Directors
Board Refreshment
The Corporate Governance, Nominating and Sustainability Committee is responsible for developing and periodically reviewing and recommending to the Board the appropriate skills and characteristics required of Board members in the context of the current composition of the Board. Such criteria, as described in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and Policies, include: business and management experience; familiarity with the business, customers and suppliers of the Company; varying and complementary talents, backgrounds and perspectives; diversity (inclusive of gender, race, ethnicity and national origin); and relevant legal, regulatory and stock exchange requirements applicable to the Board and certain of its Committees.
All potential new Board candidates should exhibit a high degree of integrity and ethics consistent with the values of the Company and the Board. In all our director nominee searches, the Committee is committed to actively seeking out highly qualified women and other diverse candidates for consideration as nominees to the Board so that the Board may select the candidates who will best enhance and complement the skills and expertise of the Board and satisfy the Board membership criteria included in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and Policies. In determining the independence of a candidate, the Committee relies upon the independence standards adopted by the Board. In addition, the Committee requires that all candidates:
Exhibit a high degree of integrity and ethics consistent with the values of the Company and the Board;
Have demonstrable and significant professional accomplishments; and
Have effective management and leadership capabilities.
The Committee also values familiarity with the rail transportation industry and with complex operations and logistics. The Committee annually considers the number of other public boards on which candidates serve when determining whether the individual circumstances of each candidate will allow the candidate sufficient time to effectively serve on the Board and contribute to its function and activities. None of the director nominees currently serves on more than two other public company boards.
The Committee meets each year to consider the inclusion of nominees in the Company’s proxy statement. During this meeting, the Committee considers each nominee by:
Reviewing relevant information provided by the nominee in his or her Company questionnaire;
Applying the criteria listed above; and
Assessing the performance of the Board and each nominee during the previous year with respect to current members of the Board.
As part of the Committee’s oversight of the Board’s self-evaluation process, the Committee assesses the effectiveness of the criteria listed above when evaluating all new director candidates and when assessing the composition of the Board. The Committee will consider candidates recommended by shareholders under the same standards after concluding that any such recommendations comply with the requirements outlined below. During 2024, the Company retained the services of Heidrick & Struggles to help identify and evaluate suitable director candidates.
Board Tenure
We believe that Board tenure diversity is important, and directors with many years of service provide the Board with a deep knowledge of our Company, while newer directors lend fresh perspectives.
The chart below reflects the Board tenure of our director nominees standing for election at the Annual Meeting. The average tenure of those directors currently serving on our Board and standing for re-election is 5.4 years.

23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NUMBER 1 – Election of Directors
Evaluation of Board and Committee Effectiveness and Performance
The Corporate Governance, Nominating and Sustainability Committee is responsible for overseeing the annual self-evaluation process of the Board and its committees, which is used by the Board and each committee to assess their effectiveness, their performance and opportunities for improvement. In addition, each committee reviews its Charter annually and reports to the Corporate Governance, Nominating and Sustainability Committee and the Board on its self-evaluation and review of its Charter.
During 2024, the evaluation process involved the distribution of a self-assessment questionnaire to all Board members inviting a review and written comments on all aspects of the Board and each committee’s role and responsibilities, as well as director performance and Board dynamics. Comments solicited related to a holistic review of how the Board can improve its key functions overseeing the Company’s overall governance and the enterprise risk profile of the Company, approving the Company’s strategic plan, monitoring strategy implementation and generally overseeing management’s operations of the business. In particular, the process solicited ideas from directors about (i) improving prioritization of issues, (ii) improving quality of Board and committee discussions on key matters, (iii) identifying specific issues that should be discussed in the future, and (iv) identifying any other matters of importance to the functioning of the Board.
The Corporate Governance, Nominating and Sustainability Committee will provide oversight for the Board as the directors continue discussing the results of this evaluation and work to address the recommendations.
Consideration of Director Nominees and Proxy Access
The Company’s Bylaws provide for “proxy access” for certain director candidates nominated by shareholders. Under the Bylaws, a shareholder or group of shareholders who have continuously held for three years a number of shares of Company common stock equal to three percent of the outstanding shares of Company common stock may request that the Company include in the Company’s proxy materials director nominees representing up to the greater of two directors or 20% of the current number of directors. Eligible shareholders wishing to have such candidates included in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders should provide the information specified in the Bylaws to the Secretary of the Company in writing during the period beginning on October 26, 2025 and ending at the close of business (5:00 pm, central time) on November 25, 2025, and should include the information and representations required by the proxy access provisions set forth in the Company’s Bylaws.
The Corporate Governance, Nominating and Sustainability Committee will consider and evaluate individuals for service on the Board suggested by directors and shareholders. Shareholders desiring to recommend candidates for consideration at the 2026 Annual Meeting should advise the Secretary of the Company in writing during the period beginning on January 8, 2026 and before the close of business (5:00 pm, central time) on February 7, 2026, and should include the following information, as well as any other information that would assist the Committee in evaluating the recommended candidates: (i) the name, age, and business and residence addresses of the candidate, (ii) the principal occupation of the candidate, and (iii) the number of shares of Company common stock beneficially owned by the candidate. A shareholder should also provide (i) his or her name and address, (ii) the number of shares of Company common stock beneficially owned by such shareholder, (iii) a description of all arrangements between himself or herself and the candidate and any other person pursuant to which the recommendation for nomination is being made, and (iv) the candidate’s written consent agreeing to any resulting nomination and to serve as a director if elected.
24

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BOARD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
We are committed to implementing and following high standards of corporate governance, which we believe are important to the success of our business and create shareholder value. The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines and Policies, and, with ongoing input from the Corporate Governance, Nominating and Sustainability Committee, will continue to assess the appropriateness of these guidelines and policies and implement such changes and adopt such additions as may be necessary or desirable to promote the effective governance of the Company. We post these guidelines and policies on our website at investor.unionpacific.com/governance/governance-overview.
Director Independence
To assist it in making determinations of a director’s independence, the Board has adopted the independence standards set forth below. The Board affirmatively determined that, except for Mr. Vena, all of our current directors, Mses. Edison, Finley, Hopkins and Lute and Messrs. DeLaney, Dillon, McCarthy, Simons, Tien, Wiehoff and Williams have no material relationship with the Company or any of its consolidated subsidiaries, including Union Pacific Railroad Company (the Railroad), (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company) and are independent within the meaning of the applicable listing standards of the NYSE and the Director Independence Standards adopted by the Board, which are available on our website at investor.unionpacific.com/governance/governance-overview.
Additionally, the Board determined that all Board Committees are comprised entirely of independent directors and that all members of the Audit Committee and Compensation and Talent Committee meet the additional independence standards applicable to such committee members as set forth below.
Director Independence Standards
An “independent” director is a director whom the Board has affirmatively determined has no material relationship with the Company or any of its consolidated subsidiaries either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company. Accordingly, a director is also not independent if:
(1)
the director is, or within the last three years has been, an employee of the Company or an immediate family member of the director is, or within the last three years has been, an executive officer of the Company;
(2)
the director (a) or an immediate family member is a current partner of a firm that is the Company’s internal or external auditor; (b) is a current employee of such a firm; (c) has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such firm and personally works on the Company’s audit; or (d) an immediate family member was within the last three years (but is no longer) a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on the Company’s audit within that time;
(3)
the director, or a member of the director’s immediate family, is, or within the last three years has been, an executive officer of another company where any of the Company’s present executives at the same time serves or served on that company’s compensation committee;
(4)
the director, or a member of the director’s immediate family, received or has received during any 12-month period within the last three years any direct compensation from the Company in excess of $120,000, other than compensation for Board service and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service with the Company, and compensation received by the director’s immediate family member for service as a non-executive employee of the Company;
(5)
the director is a current employee of a company, including a professional services firm, that has made payments to or received payments from the Company, or during any of the last three years has made payments to or received payments from the Company, for property or services in an amount that, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeded the greater of $1 million or 2% of the other company’s or firm’s consolidated gross revenues;
(6)
a member of the director’s immediate family is a current executive officer of another company, or a partner, principal or member of a professional services firm, that has made payments to or received payments from the Company, or during any of the last three fiscal years has made payments to or received payments from the Company, for property or services in an amount that, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeded the greater of $1 million or 2% of the other company’s or firm’s consolidated gross revenues; and
(7)
the director is an executive officer, director or trustee of a non-profit organization to which the Company or Union Pacific Foundation makes, or within the last three years has made, payments that, in any single fiscal year, exceeded the greater of $1 million or 2% of the non-profit organization’s consolidated gross revenues (amounts that the Company or Union Pacific Foundation contribute under matching gifts programs are not included in the payments calculated for purposes of this standard).
25

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BOARD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
For purposes of these standards, an “immediate family” member includes a director’s spouse, parents, children, siblings, mother and father-in-law, sons and daughters-in-law, brothers and sisters-in-law, and anyone (other than a domestic employee) who shares the director’s home.
Audit Committee and Compensation and Talent Committee Independence Criteria
In addition to the Board’s Director Independence Standards above, a director is not considered independent for purposes of serving on the Audit Committee or the Compensation and Talent Committee, and may not serve on such committees, if the director: (a) accepts, directly or indirectly, from the Company or any of its subsidiaries, any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee, other than Board and committee fees and fixed amounts of compensation under a retirement plan (including deferred compensation) for prior service with the Company; or (b) is an “affiliated person” of the Company or any of its subsidiaries; each as determined in accordance with NYSE and SEC rules and regulations.
Related Party Policy and Procedures
Under the Company’s Related Party Policy, transactions with related parties are subject to approval by the Corporate Governance, Nominating and Sustainability Committee (the Committee). Transactions subject to Committee review and approval include any transaction in which (i) the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000 in any calendar year, (ii) the Company is a participant, and (iii) any related party will have a direct or indirect interest (other than solely as a result of being a director or a less than 10% beneficial owner of another entity).
“Related party” is defined under the policy as any (i) person who is or was during the last fiscal year an executive officer or director of the Company or nominee for election as a director, (ii) greater than 5% beneficial owner of the Company’s common stock, or (iii) immediate family member of any of the foregoing. “Immediate family” member includes a person’s spouse, parents, stepparents, children, stepchildren, siblings, mothers and fathers-in-law, sons and daughters-in-law, and brothers and sisters-in-law and anyone residing in such person’s home (other than a tenant or employee).
In determining whether to approve or ratify a transaction, the Committee will consider, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction. The Committee will not approve any transaction if it determines it to be inconsistent with the interests of the Company and its shareholders.
Under the Related Party Policy, the Committee has pre-approved certain transactions. Such transactions include (i) any transaction with another company at which a related party’s only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer), direct or beneficial owner of less than 10% of that company’s shares, if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of that company’s total annual revenues and the related party does not otherwise have a direct economic interest in the transaction; and (ii) any charitable contribution, grant or endowment by the Company or the Company’s foundation to a charitable organization, foundation, or university at which a related party’s only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer) or a director, if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the lesser of $1 million or 2% of the charitable organization’s total annual receipts.
Additionally, the Board has delegated to the Chair of the Committee the authority to approve any transaction with any related party where the aggregate amount involved is expected to be less than $1 million. At each regularly scheduled meeting of the Committee, a summary of each new transaction approved is provided to the Committee for its review.
Related Party Transactions in 2024
Since 1994, the Railroad has historically and routinely done business with Omaha Track, Inc. and its related companies (Omaha Track). Kelvin Whited, who became the Chief Financial Officer of Omaha Track in July 2015, is the spouse of Elizabeth F. Whited, who became the Company’s President in August 2023.
In 2024, the Railroad paid Omaha Track or its affiliates approximately $26.3 million for tie disposal services, on-track scrap metal removal, and railcar repairs. All of these transactions are managed by the Railroad’s Supply Department and Ms. Whited has no involvement in these matters.
Omaha Track has been a transload provider to customers of the Railroad for transload shipments of various materials. The Railroad paid Omaha Track approximately $2.3 million in 2024 in connection with these transload services. Ms. Whited is not involved in any commercial or rate discussions involving Omaha Track.
April Rocker, Senior Manager Signal Design, is the spouse of Kenny G. Rocker, who became the Company’s Executive Vice President Marketing and Sales on August 15, 2018. Ms. Rocker has been employed by the Railroad since March 1, 2004. Ms. Rocker’s taxable compensation from the Railroad in 2024 was $159,193.
These transactions were approved by the Corporate Governance, Nominating and Sustainability Committee pursuant to the Company’s Related Party Policy.
26

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BOARD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Board Leadership Structure
Union Pacific’s strong and independent Board of Directors effectively oversees management and provides oversight of our business and strategy.
The Board believes it is in the best interest of the Company for the Board to periodically evaluate the leadership structure of the Company to determine whether to separate or combine the roles of Chairman and CEO based on circumstances at the time of its evaluation. The Board separated the positions of Chairman and CEO in August of 2023 and has since annually elected Mr. McCarthy as the Chairman of the Board. The Board recognizes that circumstances do change and will periodically review this structure. 
As Chairman of the Board, Mr. McCarthy has the following responsibilities:

Preside at meetings of the Board, including executive sessions of the independent directors;

Approve the flow of information sent to the Board, including the agenda, schedule and the materials provided for the Board meetings;

Serve as the liaison between the independent directors and the CEO;

Be available for consultation and communication with major shareholders as appropriate;

Oversee the process of evaluating and compensating the CEO (in conjunction with the Compensation and Talent Committee);

Assure that a succession plan is in place for the CEO;

Authorize or recommend the retention of consultants who report directly to the full Board;

Assist the Board and Company officers in compliance with, and implementation of, the Company’s governance guidelines and policies;

Calling special meetings of the full Board and meetings of independent directors;

Guiding and facilitating discussions between the Board and the Company’s management; and

Such other duties as may be set forth in the Bylaws of the Company or delegated by the Board from time to time.
The Board has adopted a number of strong corporate governance practices that provide effective, independent oversight of management, including:

Holding executive sessions of the non-management, independent directors after every Board meeting;

Providing that only independent directors serve on Board committees; and

Conducting an annual performance evaluation of the CEO by the independent directors.
The current Board leadership structure, when combined with the composition of the Board, the strong leadership of our independent directors, Board committees, and the highly effective corporate governance processes in place, provides independent and effective oversight of the Company’s business.
The Board welcomes and takes under consideration any input received from our shareholders regarding the Board’s leadership structure and informs shareholders of any change in the Board’s leadership structure through press releases or, as applicable, by posting amended corporate governance guidelines on the Company’s website.
Risk Oversight of the Company
Enterprise Risk Management
The Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing the assessment and management of the critical enterprise risks affecting the Company. Management identifies and prioritizes enterprise risks (included in the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K) and reviews them with the Board at least once a year to answer any questions and obtain input related to mitigation strategies and categories of risk. The Corporate Governance, Nominating and Sustainability Committee monitors and makes recommendations to the Board regarding the allocation of risk and sustainability oversight among the Board and its Committees. In allocating responsibilities, the Board takes into consideration the extent to which risk oversight of a particular area or function is integral to other oversight responsibilities of the Board committees. However, allocation of oversight responsibility to a particular committee does not preclude the Board from also considering or overseeing such risks, and the Board is periodically briefed on specific risk management initiatives. Additionally, the senior executives responsible for implementation of appropriate risk management and mitigation strategies for the Company’s top enterprise risks provide reports and updates directly to the Board and/or the Audit Committee throughout the year. The Company’s enterprise risk management process is dynamic and regularly monitored and assessed so that the Company can timely identify and address any potential risks that arise in the ever-changing economic, political, legal and technology threat environment in which the Company operates.
27

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BOARD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Audit Committee Risk Oversight
The Board has delegated to the Audit Committee primary responsibility for oversight of risks related to financial and operational controls of the Company, as well as compliance, regulatory, sustainability, climate, and cyber risks. The Chief Accounting, Risk and Compliance Officer, who reports to the Chief Financial Officer and is responsible for the Company’s enterprise risk management program, meets with the Audit Committee at each of its scheduled meetings. The Audit Committee regularly receives reports throughout the year from the Chief Accounting, Risk and Compliance Officer and the senior executives responsible for financial reporting processes, compliance, cybersecurity, and environmental and litigation matters. The Audit Committee also oversees the Company’s internal audit of enterprise risks selected for review and evaluation based upon the Company’s annual risk assessment model with the purpose of evaluating the effectiveness of mitigating controls and activities of Company personnel. The Company’s internal auditors present to the Audit Committee findings regarding the mitigating controls and processes for the enterprise risks selected for review. The Audit Committee, in turn, reports those findings to the entire Board.
Safety and Service Risk
The Safety and Service Quality Committee is comprised solely of independent directors and was established in July 2023 to oversee the Company’s management of risks related to safety and service quality. Prior to the Committee’s formation, risks related to safety were overseen by the Audit Committee. The Safety and Service Quality Committee oversees risk management related safety programs and practices, including policies, procedures and programs that promote compliance with safety policies and practices as well as any trends related to such compliance. The Safety and Service Quality Committee meets regularly with the Company’s Chief Safety Officer, Executive Vice President - Operations, Executive Vice President - Marketing and Sales and other Company senior management as appropriate. The Safety and Service Quality Committee may meet in joint sessions with the Audit Committee to review Company safety and service quality internal audit findings or other topics as appropriate.
Cybersecurity Risk
The Board of Directors has delegated primary oversight of the Company’s cybersecurity risk to the Audit Committee, which receives updates on cybersecurity risks, risk mitigation initiatives and incidents at each regularly scheduled Audit Committee meeting from our Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer (CIO) and our Assistant Vice President and Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) and other members of management, as needed. To address and mitigate cybersecurity risks, our CIO and our CISO lead our internal information security organization (Internal Cybersecurity Team) that is responsible for coordinating all aspects of the Company’s electronic information security systems, including prevention, detection, mitigation and remediation of cybersecurity incidents, as well as implementing, monitoring, and maintaining our enterprise-wide security strategy, standards, architecture, policies and processes.
Our Internal Cybersecurity Team has robust processes and redundancies in place designed with the objective of deterring, detecting, mitigating and responding to potential cybersecurity threats, which includes a vulnerability assessment, prioritization, and remediation program. We also perform regular system penetration testing to validate our security controls and assess our infrastructure and applications. All management employees take mandatory security awareness training on the Company’s data security policies and procedures, which is supplemented by Company-wide testing initiatives, including periodic phishing tests. Our information security program is designed to align our defenses and resources to identify, assess and address more likely and more damaging cyber events, to provide support for our organizational mission and operational objectives, and to position us to deter, detect, mitigate, and respond to a wide variety of potential attacks in a timely fashion.
When making decisions regarding director appointments and committee assignments, the Board takes into consideration the cybersecurity experience of directors and director candidates and strives to maintain cybersecurity expertise on the Board and the Audit Committee.
Climate Risk
Climate risk, including transition risks, is also part of our enterprise risk management program. To address climate risk, our enterprise risk management program provides for the review, monitoring and mitigation of climate change risks and how these risks may affect the Company’s ability to participate in emerging commodity or financial markets or impact rail’s environmental advantage over other modes of transportation. The Audit Committee and our Board receive updates on Company activities and mitigation strategies related to climate risk.
Other Board Committee Risk Oversight
The Corporate Governance, Nominating and Sustainability Committee also annually reviews the Company’s political activities and political activity reporting. The Compensation and Talent Committee is responsible for assessing risks arising from the Company’s compensation policies and programs and oversees human capital-related risks, including with respect to the recruitment, development and retention of Company personnel and employee engagement and effectiveness.
28

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BOARD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Board of Directors Meetings and Committees
In accordance with applicable provisions of Utah law and the Bylaws of the Company, the business and affairs of the Company are managed under the direction of the Board. The Board has established standing Committees and adopted guidelines and policies to assist it in fulfilling its responsibilities as described below.
During 2024, the Board met six times. None of the directors attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and the Committees on which he or she served. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Policies reflect our policy that all directors should attend the Annual Meeting. In accordance with this policy, all twelve directors then serving attended last year’s Annual Meeting.
The Board currently maintains five standing committees − the Audit Committee, Finance Committee, Compensation and Talent Committee, Corporate Governance, Nominating and Sustainability Committee and Safety and Service Quality Committee. Each of the committees operates under a written charter adopted by the Board, with copies available on the Company’s website at investor.unionpacific.com/governance/governance-overview and shareholders may obtain copies by contacting the Secretary of the Company at the address set forth on the notice page of this Proxy Statement. Each committee has the ability to retain outside advisors to assist it in the performance of its duties and responsibilities.
All Board Committees are composed entirely of independent directors, satisfying both the independence standards of the NYSE and the Director Independence Standards set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and Policies. Audit Committee members and Compensation and Talent Committee members also satisfy the additional independence criteria applicable to Audit Committee and Compensation and Talent Committee members under the listing standards of the NYSE.

*
Compensation and Talent Committee Chair until March 25, 2025; Mr. DeLaney will not be standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting
**
Compensation and Talent Committee Chair effective March 26, 2025
29

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BOARD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
 

DAVID B. DILLON
AUDIT COMMITTEE
 
 
 
CHAIR | MEETINGS IN 2024: 9 | OTHER MEMBERS:
Teresa M. Finley
John K. Tien, Jr.
John P. Wiehoff
Christopher J. Williams
 
 
FINANCIAL EXPERTS ON AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Board determined that all members of the Audit Committee are financially literate. The Board also determined that Ms. Finley and Messrs. Dillon, Wiehoff and Williams, each of whom are independent directors, qualify as “audit committee financial experts” as defined by the SEC and that each has accounting or related financial management expertise as required by NYSE Corporate Governance Listing Standards.
 
 
 
 
 
 
OVERVIEW
COMMITTEE FUNCTIONS
 
 
The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee: (i) the independence, performance, and qualification of the independent auditor, (ii) the audits of the Company and its subsidiaries, (iii) the system of internal controls implemented throughout the Company, (iv) the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, (v) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and (vi) the performance of the Company’s internal audit function.
The Audit Committee meets regularly with the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company, financial management, the internal auditors, the Chief Accounting, Risk and Compliance Officer and the Chief Legal Officer to provide oversight of the financial reporting process, internal control structure, and the Company’s compliance requirements and activities. The independent registered public accounting firm, the internal auditors, the Chief Accounting, Risk and Compliance Officer and the Chief Legal Officer have unrestricted access to the Committee and meet regularly with the Committee, without Company management representatives present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their opinions on the adequacy of internal controls and quality of financial reporting, and various legal matters.
The Audit Committee has established policies and procedures for the pre-approval of all services provided by the independent registered accounting firm (as described on page 40 of this Proxy Statement). The Audit Committee’s Report is included on page 40 of this Proxy Statement.
Appoint, evaluate and retain our independent registered public accounting firm
Maintain direct responsibility for the compensation, termination and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accounting firm and evaluate the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, performance and independence
Review and discuss earnings releases, audited financial statements and unaudited quarterly financial statements, including reviewing specific disclosures under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” presented in the Company’s Form 10-K and 10-Q filings
Oversee the independent registered public accounting firm’s work related to required review or assurance, if any, presented in the Company’s Form 10-K and 10-Q filings with respect to sustainability matters
Review the Company’s policies and procedures to maintain the adequacy and effectiveness of internal controls and disclosure controls
Review the scope, resources and results of the internal audit program, including participation in the Chief Internal Auditor performance review
Oversee the Company’s enterprise risk management program as well as the annual enterprise risk assessment, including the oversight of risks related to financial statements and financial reporting processes, processes, sustainability, climate, cybersecurity, environmental and litigation matters, and compliance
Oversee relevant related party transactions and disclosures governed by applicable accounting standards
Oversee the administration of the Company’s Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers and the Statement of Policy on Ethics and Business Conduct for employees
Review reporting of metrics and key performance indicators regarding the Company’s climate initiatives
Oversee the Company’s compliance program with respect to legal and regulatory requirements and developments and review annually the effectiveness of the Company’s compliance program with the Chief Accounting, Risk and Compliance Officer
 
 
 
 
 
30

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BOARD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
 


DEBORAH C. HOPKINS
FINANCE COMMITTEE
 
 
 
CHAIR | MEETINGS IN 2024: 5 | OTHER MEMBERS:  
Teresa M. Finley
Michael R. McCarthy
John K. Tien, Jr.
Christopher J. Williams
 
 
 
 
 
 
OVERVIEW
COMMITTEE FUNCTIONS
 
 
The Finance Committee is responsible for assisting the Board with its review and oversight of the Company’s financial position, plans and programs and dividend policy and actions. The Finance Committee also assists the Board by reviewing strategic options and opportunities for the Company, including acquisitions and divestitures.
Review, monitor and oversee the Company’s financial policies and financial plans, the Company’s capital structure, balance sheet, credit ratings, short-and long-term financing plans and programs, derivatives policy, share repurchases and dividend policy
Review the Company’s liquidity position, including the Company’s credit facilities and its bank group
Review the Company’s investor relations programs, including the Company’s interaction with the investor community
Appoint, oversee and review the performance of the Company’s internal investment committee that is responsible for the investment management of assets held by the Company’s pension, thrift and other funded employee benefit programs
Review and update the Board with respect to the Company’s issuance of debt or other finance transactions that include sustainability related financing transactions
Review and recommend to the Board, as necessary, the Company’s tax credit purchase programs and plans
Evaluate the implications of the Company’s enterprise risk management framework and risk assessment related to the duties and responsibilities outlined above, including in the context of the Company’s business strategy, regulatory, competitive and macroeconomic environments, as well as sustainability and climate initiatives
 
 
 
 
 
31

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BOARD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
 

DOYLE R. SIMONS
COMPENSATION AND TALENT COMMITTEE
 
 
 
CHAIR | MEETINGS IN 2024: 6 | OTHER MEMBERS:
William J. DeLaney*
Sheri H. Edison
Deborah C. Hopkins
* Chair until March 25, 2025
 
 
COMPENSATION AND TALENT INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
There were no Compensation and Talent Committee interlocks or insider participation in 2024.
 
 
 
 
 
 
OVERVIEW
COMMITTEE FUNCTIONS
 
 
The Compensation and Talent Committee, previously the Compensation and Benefits Committee, was renamed in 2024 to more appropriately reflect the Committee’s role in talent management and development.
The Compensation and Talent Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities related to compensation and talent. The Committee will (i) report to the Board on matters concerning the Company’s compensation philosophy and strategy, (ii) oversee the Company’s general compensation plans including its executive compensation plans and equity-based plans, and (iii) assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities regarding the design, establishment, and termination of employee benefit plans and practices subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. The Committee will also perform such duties and responsibilities as may be assigned to it under the terms of the Company’s general compensation and employee benefit plans.
The Compensation and Talent Committee reviews the Company’s talent pool with senior leadership, including development and leadership succession.
The Compensation and Talent Committee annually reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the CEO and certain other elected executives. The details of the processes and procedures involved are described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A). The independent members of the full Board ratify the Compensation and Talent Committee’s decision regarding the CEO’s compensation. The Committee may form subcommittees for any purpose that the Committee deems appropriate and may delegate to such subcommittees such power and authority as the Committee deems appropriate.
The Compensation and Talent Committee Report is included on page 59 of this Proxy Statement.
Review and approve corporate goals and objectives relevant to the CEO’s compensation, evaluate the CEO’s performance and, subject to ratification by the other independent directors, determine and approve the CEO’s compensation
Review and approve, subject to ratification by the Board, the compensation of the Company’s elected officers and other executives determined by the Committee or the Board
Annually review compliance by the CEO and executive officers with the Company’s stock ownership requirements
Oversee and approve, subject to ratification by the Board, the determination of annual incentive compensation under the executive incentive plan
Review and discuss with management the CD&A and recommend to the Board its inclusion in our Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K
Oversee the assessment of the risks related to the Company’s compensation policies and programs and annually review the results of this assessment
Oversee the administration of the Company’s clawback policy
Oversee the administration of the Company’s general compensation plans and employee benefit plans and review the goals and objectives of employee benefit plans, including pension and thrift plans
Oversee the Company’s talent management strategies and policies, including recruitment, development and retention of Company personnel; employee effectiveness and engagement; and workplace environment
 
 
 
 
 
32

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BOARD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Compensation Consultant
Under its charter, the Compensation and Talent Committee (the Committee) has the authority to retain, terminate and approve fees for advisors and consultants as it deems necessary. The Committee, in its discretion, uses outside advisors and experts to assist it in performing its duties and fulfilling its responsibilities. The Committee has retained Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (FW Cook) as its independent compensation consultant. A representative of FW Cook attends all Committee meetings. The Committee is solely responsible for the engagement and termination of this relationship. The Committee reviewed the engagement of FW Cook during 2024 as the Committee’s compensation consultant and determined that the engagement of FW Cook did not raise any conflicts of interest.
FW Cook advises the Committee on compensation philosophy and matters related to CEO and other executive and director compensation. The Committee annually requests that FW Cook update compensation and performance data on the peer companies selected by the Committee, as described on page 47 of this Proxy Statement. In addition, the Committee periodically requests that FW Cook make presentations on various topics, such as compensation trends and best practices, regulatory changes, long-term incentive components and award mix and stock plan utilization. The Committee Chair reviews and approves all charges for these consulting services.
The Committee has also authorized FW Cook to confer with management on a limited basis to promote consistency and efficiency. In such matters, FW Cook acts in its capacity as the Committee’s advisor, and the Committee Chair reviews and approves any major projects for which management requests the assistance of FW Cook. Such projects involve only the amount and form of executive or director compensation and may include analysis of competitive executive and director compensation data, design and development of new compensation and stock plans, calculation of compensation amounts reported in this Proxy Statement and review of materials prior to distribution to the Committee to confirm that the materials conform with the Committee’s philosophy and policies. The Committee Chair reviews and approves all charges for any projects requested by management. During 2024, the Company paid fees to FW Cook only for advising on matters under the Committee’s purview. The Company did not pay any fees for additional projects or services.
In early 2025, the Committee, with the assistance of FW Cook, conducted its annual compensation risk assessment of our incentive compensation programs and confirmed that they were designed to operate within a system of guidelines and controls to avoid creating any material adverse risks to the Company.
33

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BOARD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
 

SHERI H. EDISON
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, NOMINATING
AND SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE
 
 
 
CHAIR | MEETINGS IN 2024: 4 | OTHER MEMBERS:
David B. Dillon
Jane H. Lute
Michael R. McCarthy
 
 
 
 
 
 
OVERVIEW
COMMITTEE FUNCTIONS
 
 
The Corporate Governance, Nominating and Sustainability Committee oversees and assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities relating to corporate governance principles and practices applicable to the Board and the Company and to the oversight of Board composition, evaluation, procedures, and composition of Board committees.
In connection with fulfilling its function of promoting excellence in governance, the Committee (i) advises the Board with respect to corporate governance matters, (ii) oversees the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and Policies and recommends modifications of the Guidelines to the Board, (iii) identifies qualified individuals to serve as directors of the Company consistent with criteria approved by the Board, recommends candidates to the Board as director nominees for election at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and fill Board vacancies and (iv) oversees sustainability strategy development, goals, policies and Board committee responsibilities related to sustainability.
Develop and recommend to the Board criteria for identifying and evaluating candidates for the Board
Identify and recruit qualified director candidates for the Board
Review annually the contributions and independence of existing directors and recommend director nominee candidates to the Board for election or re-election at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
Review periodically the composition and activities of the Board, including, but not limited to, committee structure and responsibilities, committee memberships, Board size, the director retirement policy and director compensation and stock ownership requirements
Review the Board’s leadership structure annually, recommending changes to the Board when appropriate, and oversee the election of the lead independent director as applicable
Oversee the Corporate Governance Guidelines and Policies as applicable and the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for members of the Board of Directors
Oversee the Related Party Transaction Policy and oversee procedures for administering and promoting compliance with the policy
Review annually the Company’s political contributions and lobbying activities and the Company’s political contributions policy and any applicable Company guidelines
Oversee sustainability strategy development, goals, and policies
Oversee external reporting and engagement with shareholders and stakeholders on sustainability matters
 
 
 
 
 
34

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BOARD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
 

Jane H. Lute
Safety and Service Quality Committee
 
 
 
CHAIR | MEETINGS IN 2024: 4 | OTHER MEMBERS:
William J. DeLaney
Doyle R. Simons
John P. Wiehoff
 
 
 
 
 
OVERVIEW
COMMITTEE FUNCTIONS
 
 
Established in July 2023, the Safety and Service Quality Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities to: (i) review and provide oversight of the safety programs and practices of the Company, (ii) monitor the Company’s progress on such safety programs and practices, and (iii) review, monitor and provide oversight of the Company’s service performance.

The Safety and Service Quality Committee meets regularly with the Company’s Chief Safety Officer, Executive Vice President of Operations and other Company senior management regarding the Company’s safety performance, trends and initiatives. The Safety and Service Quality Committee also meets regularly with the Executive Vice President of Marketing and Sales and Company senior management to review service quality, including performance measures, trends and initiatives.

The Safety and Service Quality Committee may meet in joint sessions with the Audit Committee to review Company safety and service quality internal audit findings or other topics as appropriate.
Review the Company’s safety programs and practices, including all policies, procedures and programs that promote compliance as well as any trends related to such compliance

Oversee risk management related safety programs and practices, including the Company’s risk mitigation measures established in the event of non-compliance with the Company’s safety programs and practices

Review service quality targets, metrics and trends

Review customer experience and satisfaction

Oversee Company internal audit findings related to safety and service
 
 
 
 
 
35

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BOARD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Codes of Conduct and Ethics
The Board has adopted the Union Pacific Corporation Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers, the Union Pacific Code of Conduct for employees and the Union Pacific Corporation Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Members of the Board of Directors. We post these codes of conduct on our website at investor.unionpacific.com/governance/governance-overview and printed copies are available to any shareholder upon request to the Secretary of the Company at the address set forth on the notice page of this Proxy Statement. To the extent permitted by SEC rules and the NYSE listing standards, we intend to disclose any future amendments to, or waivers from, certain provisions of these codes of conduct on our website.
Communications with the Board
Interested parties wishing to communicate with the Board, including with the independent Chairman of the Board, may do so by U.S. mail c/o the Corporate Secretary, Union Pacific Corporation, 1400 Douglas Street, 19th Floor, Omaha, NE 68179. Communications intended for a specific director or directors (e.g., the Chairman of the Board, a committee chairperson or all of the non-management directors) should be addressed to their attention and sent, by U.S. mail, to the address above. The Board has appointed and authorized the Corporate Secretary of the Company to process these communications and forward them to the appropriate directors. We forward appropriate communications from shareholders directly to the appropriate Board member(s). If a communication is illegal, unduly hostile or threatening, or similarly inappropriate, the Corporate Secretary of the Company has the authority to disregard or take appropriate action regarding any such communication.
36

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION IN FISCAL YEAR 2024
Non-Management Directors’ Fees and Compensation
During 2024, non-employee directors were compensated for their Board service as shown below. Directors who are employees do not receive retainers or any other Board-related compensation. All compensation elements are paid quarterly in arrears on the first business day following the end of the quarter.
Element
Annual Amount
Annual Retainer
$300,000
($175,000 annual mandatory deferral into a
Stock Unit Account, remainder
($125,000) may be deferred at the director’s
election or taken in cash)
Annual Mandatory Deferral
$175,000 of the Annual Retainer deferred
in the Stock Unit Account described below
Committee Chair Retainer
Audit: $25,000
Others: $20,000
Audit Committee Member Retainer
$10,000
Lead Director Retainer (if applicable)
$45,000
Non-Executive Board Chair Retainer
$200,000
($120,000 annual mandatory deferral into a
Stock Unit Account, remainder
($80,000) may be deferred at the director’s
election or taken in cash; received by Mr. McCarthy subsequent
to his election as Chairman of the Board on August 14, 2023)
Stock Unit Grant and Deferred Compensation Plan for the Board of Directors
Under our Stock Unit Grant and Deferred Compensation Plan for non-management directors, a director may, by December 31 of any year, elect to defer all or a portion of any compensation (in addition to the amount mentioned above that is required to be invested in their Stock Unit Account) for service as a director in the ensuing year or years, excluding reimbursements for expenses. Such deferred amounts may be invested, at the option of the director, in (i) a Fixed Rate Fund administered by the Company, (ii) a Stock Unit Account administered by the Company, or (iii) various notional accounts administered by The Vanguard Group. These accounts are unfunded, unsecured obligations of the Company. The Company Fixed Rate Fund bears interest equal to 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate compounded annually. The Stock Unit Account fluctuates in value based on changes in the price of our common stock, and equivalents to cash dividends paid on the common stock are deemed to be reinvested in the Stock Unit Account. The Vanguard Accounts are subject to earnings and value fluctuations from the investment performance of the notional accounts at Vanguard. Payment of all deferred amounts begins in January of the year following separation from service as a director. Deferred amounts may be paid, at the election of the director, in either a lump-sum or in up to 15 equal, annual installments.
2000 Directors Stock Plan
Under the 2000 Directors Stock Plan (the 2000 Directors Plan) adopted by our shareholders on April 21, 2000, the Company may grant options to purchase shares of our common stock to non-management directors. Upon recommendation of the Corporate Governance, Nominating and Sustainability Committee in September 2007, the Board eliminated the annual grant of options for 2008 and future years. The Company did not award any options to non-management directors in 2024.
Previously, each non-management director, upon election to the Board of Directors, would receive a grant of 4,000 restricted shares of our common stock or restricted share units that represent the right to receive our common stock in the future (which number has been adjusted to reflect the Company’s two-for-one stock splits on May 28, 2008 and June 6, 2014). The restricted shares or share units vest on the date a director ceases to be a director by reason of death, disability or retirement, as defined in the 2000 Directors Plan. During the restricted period, the director has the right to vote such restricted shares and receive dividends or dividend equivalents, but may not transfer or encumber such shares or units. The director would forfeit such shares or units upon ceasing to be a director for any reason other than death, disability or retirement. Effective August 1, 2018, the Board approved the elimination of this initial equity grant for newly elected directors.
37

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION IN FISCAL YEAR 2024
Non-Management Director Compensation in Fiscal Year 2024
The following table provides a summary of the compensation of our non-management directors for 2024.
NAME
FEES EARNED
OR PAID IN CASH
STOCK AWARDS (a)
OPTION AWARDS
ALL OTHER
COMPENSATION (b)
TOTAL
COMPENSATION
William J. DeLaney
320,000
0
0
33,717
353,717
David B. Dillon
335,000
0
0
29,519
364,519
Sheri H. Edison
320,000
0
0
32,784
352,784
Teresa M. Finley
310,000
0
0
32,157
342,157
Deborah C. Hopkins
320,000
0
0
33,250
353,250
Jane H. Lute
322,500
0
0
25,624
348,124
Michael R. McCarthy
500,000
0
0
27,805
527,805
Doyle R. Simons
300,000
0
0
4,363
304,363
John K. Tien, Jr.
307,500
0
0
7,284
314,784
John P. Wiehoff
310,000
0
0
7,447
317,447
Christopher J. Williams
310,000
0
0
17,599
327,599
(a)
The following table provides the outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end held by all individuals who served as non-management directors in 2024. The Number of Shares in the Vesting Upon Termination column represents the shares granted to each director upon initial election to the Board and required to be held until his or her service as a member of the Board ends.
NAME
NUMBER OF SECURITIES
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED OPTIONS
NUMBER OF SHARES
VESTING UPON TERMINATION
NUMBER OF UNITS IN
DEFERRED STOCK UNIT ACCOUNT
William J. DeLaney
0
0 (c)
5,661
David B. Dillon
0
4,000
12,308
Sheri H. Edison
0
0 (c)
2,421
Teresa M. Finley
0
0 (c)
2,309
Deborah C. Hopkins
0
4,000
11,492
Jane H. Lute
0
4,000
10,051
Michael R. McCarthy
0
4,000
67,312
Doyle R. Simons
0
0 (c)
1,594
John K. Tien, Jr.
0
0 (c)
797
John P. Wiehoff
0
0 (c)
1,068
Christopher J. Williams
0
0 (c)
5,094
(b)
Excess liability insurance premiums paid in 2024 for each non-management director were $2,805. Under the Company’s charitable matching gift program which is also available to all employees of the Company, the Company matched the following amounts for each director: Mr. DeLaney $25,000, Mr. Dillon, $25,000; Ms. Edison, $25,000; Ms. Finley, $25,000; Ms. Hopkins, $25,000; Ms. Lute, $22,500; Mr. McCarthy, $25,000; and Mr. Williams, $14,700. In addition, the Company began paying Nebraska state income taxes on behalf of nonresident directors in 2014 because of their travel to Nebraska required for Company business. The reimbursement covers the incremental cost of these nonresident directors’ taxes. The directors do not claim any tax benefits for the reimbursement in their resident states. The amounts shown in the table reflect additional federal and Nebraska income taxes paid in 2024 for the applicable director’s service, and stock option exercises, if any, during the director’s service in 2023. The Company does not consider this a perquisite and does not gross-up or pay any state income taxes that the directors incur in their normal work locations.
(c)
Upon recommendation of the Corporate Governance, Nominating and Sustainability Committee, effective August 1, 2018, the Board eliminated the 4,000 share grant to non-management directors upon their election to the Board.
38

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NUMBER 2 − Ratification of Appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Year Ending December 31, 2025
The Audit Committee has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the books and accounts of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries for the year ending December 31, 2025 and submits this selection for ratification by a vote of shareholders as a matter of good corporate governance. In the event that the Audit Committee’s selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP does not receive an affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast, the Audit Committee will review its future selection of an independent registered public accounting firm.
The Audit Committee believes that the continued retention of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of our shareholders as there are several benefits to the Company of having a long-tenured auditor.
Enhanced Audit Quality. Through more than 50 years of experience with the Company, Deloitte & Touche LLP has gained institutional knowledge and deep expertise regarding the Company’s rail operations and business, accounting policies and practices and internal control over financial reporting.
Competitive Fee Structure. Due to Deloitte & Touche LLP’s familiarity with the Company, audit fees are competitive with peer companies.
Avoids Costs Associated with New Auditor. Onboarding a new independent accountant is costly and requires a significant time commitment that could distract from management’s focus on financial reporting and controls.
The Company expects that a representative of Deloitte & Touche LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if such representative desires to do so and are expected to be available to respond to relevant questions by shareholders.
Vote Required for Approval
Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2025 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal at the Annual Meeting.
The Board recommends a vote FOR ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2025.
39

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Fees and Services
Aggregate fees billed to the Company for services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm for each of the past two years are set forth below:
 
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
 
2024
2023
Audit Fees
$3,395,600
$3,568,100
Audit-Related Fees
236,995
232,345
Tax Fees
66,700
187,900
All Other Fees
0
575,000
Total
$3,699,295
$4,563,345
Audit Fees. Audit services included the integrated audit of financial statements and internal control, quarterly reviews, statutory audit services, and comfort letters provided in conjunction with the issuance of debt.
Audit-Related Fees. Audit-related services included consultation on accounting standards and transactions, audits of employee benefit plans, agreed-upon procedures performed on the Annual Report R-1 filed by Union Pacific Railroad Company with the Surface Transportation Board, and agreed-upon procedures related to reports to be filed with the Environmental Protection Agency and certain state agencies.
Tax Fees. Tax fees included fees for corporate tax planning and consultation services and work performed for international tax compliance.
All Other Fees. All other fees included fees for acquisition consultation services and ESG readiness consultation services during the year ended December 31, 2023.
Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services Policy
The Audit Committee’s charter requires the Committee to approve in advance all audit engagement fees and the terms of all audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. By approving the engagement, which is performed in conjunction with the first Board meeting of each year, the audit services are deemed pre-approved. As part of its pre-approval policy, the Committee considers whether the provision of any proposed non-audit services is consistent with auditor independence. With respect to non-audit services provided by the independent registered accounting firm, the Audit Committee adopted and observes procedures that require the independent registered public accounting firm to present a budget for the three categories of non-audit services: (i) audit-related services, (ii) tax services and (iii) other services. The budget is detailed as to the particular services to be provided so that the Committee knows what services it is being requested to pre-approve in order to facilitate a well-reasoned assessment of the impact of the services on the auditor’s independence. After review and approval of the annual budget by the Committee, no further approval by the Committee is required to undertake specific projects within the three categories of non-audit services. The Committee pre-approved all Deloitte & Touche LLP’s 2023 and 2024 fees and services.
Audit Committee Report
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024. The Committee has discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, the matters required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under applicable Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) standards and SEC Rule 2-07 of Regulation S-X. The Committee also has received the written disclosure and correspondence from Deloitte & Touche LLP required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Deloitte & Touche LLP communications with the Committee concerning independence and has discussed their independence with them. Based on the foregoing reviews and discussions, the Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements referred to above be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, for filing with the SEC.
The Audit Committee
David B. Dillon, Chair
Teresa M. Finley
John K. Tien, Jr.
John P. Wiehoff
Christopher J. Williams
40

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NUMBER 3 − Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation
The Board of Directors asks shareholders to support a non-binding, advisory resolution approving the Company’s executive compensation as reported in this Proxy Statement.
We design our executive compensation programs to support the Company’s long-term success. As described below in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, the Compensation and Talent Committee has structured the Company’s executive compensation programs to achieve key Company goals and objectives. We believe our compensation philosophy allows us to link realized pay to performance measures and reward management efforts that produce consistent, long-term performance accompanied with effective risk management and execution of the Company’s strategy. As more fully discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis:
Annual and long-term incentives continue to represent a significant portion of our executive compensation program. In 2024, such annual and long-term incentives constituted approximately 91% of Mr. Vena’s target compensation opportunity and approximately 84% of the target compensation opportunity for the other NEOs. This variable compensation is at risk and directly dependent upon the achievement of Company financial performance goals or stock price appreciation.
Under the 2024 Annual Incentive Plan approved by the Board, seventy percent (70%) of the target annual incentive cash bonuses paid to our NEOs was based on the attainment of pre-established objective financial goals, equally weighted between operating income and operating ratio, ten percent (10%) on the attainment of pre-established safety goals consisting of the reportable personal injury rate (5%) and the reportable derailment rate (5%) and twenty percent (20%) was based on a shared set of Company goals in key areas such as service performance index for intermodal and manifest, net promoter score, volume growth above market, employee engagement and renewable fuel blend.
Performance stock units (PSUs) (which constitute 60% of the long-term equity incentive opportunity) are tied to two performance criteria: two-thirds (2/3) on the average annual return on invested capital (ROIC) for a three-year performance period (Performance Period) and one-third (1/3) on the Company’s operating income growth (OIG) over the Performance Period as compared to the OIG of the companies in the S&P 100 Industrials Index and the Class I Railroads.
Our stock ownership guidelines promote meaningful and significant stock ownership by our executives, including the NEOs, and align their interests with those of our shareholders.
In the 2024 advisory vote, approximately 96% of the votes cast supported the compensation of the Company’s NEOs.
The Board urges shareholders to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, beginning on page 46 of this Proxy Statement, which describes in more detail how our executive compensation policies and procedures operate and are designed to align compensation with our Company strategy, goals and objectives and with best practices. Shareholders should also review the Summary Compensation Table and related compensation tables and narrative, appearing on pages 60 through 74, which provide detailed information regarding the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. The Compensation and Talent Committee and the Board of Directors believe that the policies and procedures articulated in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis create effective incentives for achieving Company goals, including returns to shareholders, and that the compensation of our Named Executive Officers reported in this Proxy Statement has supported and directly contributed to the Company’s performance and success.
In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and as a matter of good corporate governance, the Board asks shareholders to approve the following advisory resolution at the Annual Meeting:
RESOLVED, that the shareholders of Union Pacific Corporation (the Company) approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the related compensation tables and narrative in the Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
This advisory resolution, commonly referred to as a “say on pay” resolution, is non-binding on the Board of Directors. Although non-binding, the Board and the Compensation and Talent Committee will review and consider the voting results when evaluating the Company’s executive compensation programs.
In accordance with the results of the advisory vote held at the Company’s 2023 Annual Meeting to determine the frequency of an advisory vote on Named Executive Officer compensation, the Company currently holds an advisory vote on the compensation of Company’s Named Executive Officers on an annual basis. The Company will continue to hold the vote annually until at least the next frequency vote is held (which is not required until 2029).
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the advisory resolution to approve executive compensation.
41

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A LETTER FROM OUR COMPENSATION AND TALENT COMMITTEE
Dear Fellow Union Pacific Shareholders:
Thank you for your continued support of Union Pacific.
Our 2024 executive compensation program, described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the CD&A) that follows, is structured to closely align compensation to management’s performance and its execution against the Company’s strategic goals and value creation for our shareholders. We believe that Mr. Vena’s leadership in his first year as CEO, in addition to management’s performance, has been instrumental to the Company’s execution of its strategy to lead the industry in safety, service, and operational excellence.
In particular, we note the Company’s 2024 safety performance as the reportable personal injury rate of 0.90 improved 23% and the reportable derailment rate of 2.17 improved 20% compared to 2023. Additionally, the Service Performance Index (SPI) for both intermodal and manifest improved 2 and 4 points, respectively, compared to 2023 and most of the Company’s operating metrics improved year-over year. The Company also delivered solid financial performance. For the full year 2024, net income was $6.7 billion or $11.09 per diluted share, up 6% from 2023. The full year operating ratio of 59.9% improved 2.4 points compared to 2023. In 2024, Union Pacific returned $4.7 billion to its shareholders in the form of dividends and share repurchases.
More detailed highlights of the Company’s safety, operational and financial performance are included in the 2024 Business Highlights section that follows on pages 44 and 45.
Our Fiscal 2024 Compensation Decisions
We have long anchored our compensation philosophy in pay for performance, and consistent with this philosophy, we separately weighted two safety metrics (which in prior years were part of our strategic scorecard) in the formulaic portion of the 2024 Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) to better align with the Company’s Safety, Service and Operational Excellence leading to Growth strategy. Under the 2024 AIP, financial performance continued to be heavily weighted, with seventy percent (70%) of each NEO’s target annual incentive cash bonus based on two equally-weighted, pre-established financial performance metrics: operating income (35%) and operating ratio (35%). Ten percent (10%) of each NEO’s target opportunity was based on pre-established safety metrics — the reportable personal injury rate (5%) and the reportable derailment rate (5%).
The remaining twenty percent (20%) of each NEO’s target incentive cash bonus was based on the Company’s strategic scorecard, a shared set of Company goals in key areas, and more fully described on page 54 of the CD&A, such as SPI for intermodal and manifest, net promoter score, volume growth above market, employee engagement and renewable fuel blend. The 10% individual performance component for the NEOs was eliminated in 2024.
Under this formula-based annual incentive plan, performance for 2024 resulted in a payment of 163% of target for each of the NEOs, as a result of achieving above target operating income and operating ratio performance and above target safety performance as reflected by both the Company’s reportable personal injury rate and reportable derailment rate, as well as meeting or exceeding most strategic scorecard objectives.
A discussion of the 2024 AIP can be found on pages 52 through 54 of the CD&A.
Long-term equity incentives continued to be a key component of our compensation program, as we believe they support alignment of our executives’ interests with the interests of our shareholders. The 2024 equity grants for each of the NEOs consisted of sixty percent (60%) performance stock units (PSUs) and forty percent (40%) stock options. The PSUs granted in February 2024 (the 2024 PSUs) may be earned based on two performance criteria: two-thirds (2/3) on the average annual return on invested capital (ROIC) for a three-year performance period (Performance Period) and one-third (1/3) on the Company’s operating income growth (OIG) over the Performance Period as compared to the OIG of the companies in the S&P 100 Industrials Index and the Class I Railroads.
42

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The performance period for the PSUs granted in February 2022 ended in 2024, and the NEOs holding those awards earned 90% of the target number of stock units with respect to this grant. Additional information about outstanding PSU grants can be found on pages 55 and 56.
We respectfully request your support of our executive pay program again this year. The decision to maintain the basic structure of our executive compensation program for 2024 reflects the strong shareholder support we received at our last Annual Meeting, direct feedback from shareholders, and our determination that the program effectively tied pay to performance and aligned well with the Company’s business strategy.
Thank you for your continued support and investment in Union Pacific.
Respectfully,

The Compensation and Talent Committee
William J. DeLaney, Chair*
Sheri H. Edison
Deborah C. Hopkins
Doyle R. Simons**
*
Chair until March 25, 2025
**
Chair effective March 26, 2025
43

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2024 Business Highlights
Union Pacific Railroad Company is the principal operating company of Union Pacific Corporation. One of America's most recognized companies, Union Pacific Railroad Company connects 23 states in the western two-thirds of the country by rail, providing a critical link in the global supply chain. The Railroad’s diversified business mix includes Bulk, Industrial, and Premium. Union Pacific serves many of the fastest-growing U.S. population centers, operates from all major West Coast and Gulf Coast ports to Eastern gateways, connects with Canada's rail systems, and is the only railroad serving all six major Mexico gateways. Union Pacific provides value to its roughly 10,000 customers by delivering products in a safe, reliable, fuel-efficient, and environmentally responsible manner.
Safety, Service, and Operational Excellence supports the Company's long-term initiative to grow its freight volumes. Together as a team, the Company will focus on achieving the best safety record in the industry, being known for superior service, grounded in operational excellence, which, in turn, drives growth.
Safety is paramount and, as our first area of focus, sets the foundation for achieving the Company's objectives. The mindset and culture are built around a personal commitment by all employees to prioritize safety so everyone goes home safely.
Service is all about delivering what we sold our customers. We work with our customers to understand the service they need to win in their markets and then drive how we win together. We commit to these service levels and do it with excellence.
Operational Excellence is about operating efficiently and productively. We will drive value with our available resources but also maintain a buffer so our service is resilient, managing the inevitable ups and downs that come with weather, fluctuating volumes, and securing growth.
Growth is the outcome of executing our strategy to be the industry leader in both safety and service. The volume growth combined with safety, service, and operational excellence results in improved margins and greater cash generation, creating long term enterprise value. The expected outcome of successfully executing our strategy will be an industry leading operating ratio and return on invested capital.
As we work to transform our railroad, our core values continue to guide us. Our passion for performance will help us win; our high ethical standards ensure we win in a way that supports all of our stakeholders; and our teamwork ensures we win together.
2024 Results
Safety – 2024 was a transformational year on our journey to becoming the safest railroad. Our strategy is broken into four pillars – Injury Prevention, Leverage Technology, Situational Awareness Testing, and Peer-to-Peer Engagement.
Injury Prevention efforts focus on specific, critical tasks to reduce the risk of injury or derailment. These critical tasks are those where any form of non-compliance can result in a serious injury. Training is key to helping our employees understand how to execute those tasks safely.
We are Leveraging Technology to eliminate or automate activities with the most risk. We have more than 7,000 wayside detectors that monitor freight cars and locomotives in real time, generating 16 million data points daily to proactively identify and mitigate risks. We are building safer trains with our proprietary Physics Train Builder technology, which allows us to evaluate train and route characteristics to enable proactive intervention by our Operating Practices Command Center to prevent derailments. We utilize our autonomous geometry car fleet to inspect 500,000 miles of track annually. This technology and the data it provides enable us to direct investments and resources in the right place, helping to significantly reduce track-caused derailments by 28% over the last 10 years.
Situational Awareness Testing (a program we call COMMIT) is our program that observes, tests, and coaches our employees to promote understanding and compliance with our work rules. This goes beyond the classroom, with an emphasis on being in the field with the employees as they are performing the activities that run the railroad.
Peer-to-Peer Engagement is driving employee ownership through engagement with our safety programs. This is our culture, a personal commitment to do our jobs with a passion for safety so everyone goes home safely. Employees are encouraged to speak up if they see unsafe behaviors.
The focus on these four pillars is driving results. Our personal injury rate (the number of reportable injuries for every 200,000 employee-hours worked) is down 23% and our derailment incident rate (the number of reportable derailment incidents per million train miles) down 20% compared to 2023 results.
Service – Service performance index for both intermodal and manifest products improved 2 and 4 points, respectively, compared to 2023. Throughout the year we improved network fluidity as reflected in 2% faster freight car velocity and record terminal dwell which improved 3% from 2023.
44

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2024 Business Highlights
Operational Excellence – Network performance throughout 2024 was strong. While we experienced some powerful weather events in the second quarter and a second half unexpected surge in international intermodal shipments, most of our operating metrics improved year-over year. We maintained a resource buffer that allowed us to strategically integrate crews, locomotives, and freight cars into the network to efficiently handle the growth and recover from the weather events.
Financial Results – Core pricing gains, strong productivity, and 3% volume growth contributed positively to our financial results. Operating income of $9.7 billion increased 7% from 2023, and our operating ratio was 59.9%, improving 2.4 points from 2023. Net income of $6.7 billion translated into earnings of $11.09 per diluted share, up 6% from 2023.
We generated $9.3 billion of cash provided by operating activities, yielded free cash flow of $2.8 billion after reductions of $3.3 billion for cash used in investing activities and $3.2 billion in dividends paid. Both cash provided by operating activities and free cash flow were higher by $384 million due to payments in 2023 related to back wages for agreements reached with our labor unions.
Please also refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for a complete analysis of the Company’s 2024 financial and operating performance and non-GAAP reconciliation of free cash flow on page 24.
45

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
CD&A ROADMAP
Executive Compensation Philosophy and the Compensation-Setting Process
The Company’s executive compensation philosophy is to:
Pay for Performance — We tie pay to performance by aligning a significant portion of the executive’s opportunity for compensation to annual (short-term) and long-term Company strategy. We also integrate the Company’s critical business objectives (safety, service, and financial performance) into the Company’s strategy and compensation programs to reflect individual performance and management effectiveness, along with other qualitative factors, which contribute to the Company’s performance.
Align with Shareholder Interests — We link a substantial portion of executive compensation to both short-term and long-term financial performance that benefits our shareholders and aligns the interests of management with those of our shareholders by providing equity incentives.
Attract and Retain Top Talent — We are able to attract and retain key executives critical to our long-term success by structuring compensation levels to reflect the competitive marketplace for similar positions at other comparable peer group companies.
The Compensation and Talent Committee (the Committee) believes this compensation philosophy allows us to reward behavior that produces consistent, long-term performance accompanied with effective risk management and execution of the Company’s strategy.
The Committee carefully evaluates and considers a number of factors in connection with its executive compensation decisions, including:

Company performance against objectives;

Guidance from the Committee’s compensation consultant;

Input from the CEO; and

Appropriate peer comparisons and third-party compensation surveys.
Company Performance. Under the Company’s annual incentive cash program, the Company measures its performance against a formulaic component based on pre-established operating income, operating ratio and safety targets, as well as a non-formulaic component based on the Committee’s evaluation of certain business objectives related to service and other
46

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Compensation Philosophy and the Compensation-Setting Process
strategic performance outlined on pages 52 through 54. Under the performance stock unit component of the Company’s long-term incentive (LTI) program, the Company measures three-year average ROIC and relative OIG. Management develops the Company’s overall strategy and the corresponding business objectives and presents them to the Board for approval annually in February. After Board approval of the annual operating plan, the Committee establishes the financial and strategic performance goals for the compensation program with assistance and advice from the Finance Committee of the Board. The Committee recommends the operating income, operating ratio and safety targets for the annual incentive cash program and the three-year ROIC targets for the performance stock unit program to the Board for approval each February. The Board monitors the Company’s progress concerning execution of its strategy and its business objectives during the year. At the end of the year, the Board assesses the Company’s achievement of these objectives. Each February, subsequent to the applicable performance year, management presents to the Committee the Company’s performance results against the annual incentive program and performance stock unit program goals, as well as its relative performance compared to the Peer Group. This process informs the Committee’s decisions on approving earned amounts of annual and long-term incentive compensation for performance periods ending the prior year.
Guidance from Compensation Consultant and Input from CEO. The Committee reviews and recommends the compensation of all NEOs to the Board for its approval. The CEO provides the Committee with his evaluation of the performance of the other NEOs and his recommendations for their compensation. The Committee also receives information and recommendations from its independent compensation consultant (FW Cook) on matters related to the NEOs’ (including the CEO’s) and other executives’ compensation. The Committee then determines (with advice from the Board, and assistance from its consultant) the annual incentive bonus and equity award for the Company’s CEO.
For more information on the operation of the Committee, including information on its compensation consultant, see page 33 of this Proxy Statement.
Peer Companies. The Committee benchmarks salary, Total Target Cash Compensation (the sum of base salary and target annual incentive compensation) and Total Target Direct Compensation (the sum of Total Target Cash Compensation and the target grant-date fair value of long-term incentives) for the NEOs against competitive market information. To assess competitive market information, the Committee looks primarily to pay data from the proxy statements of the Company’s Peer Group. In determining 2024 target pay opportunities for the NEOs, the Committee considered competitive market information gathered in 2023 from the Peer Group.
As further discussed below, the Committee generally targets a range around the median of the Peer Group for Total Target Cash Compensation and Total Target Direct Compensation. Actual Total Direct Compensation and Actual Total Cash Compensation may be greater or less than targeted percentiles, depending upon whether and to what degree the Company achieves its business objectives (as described above).
Other factors considered in setting target compensation levels may include the individual performance of each NEO and his or her position relative to the Company’s current internal pay structure or changes in personnel or compensation at the Peer Group companies. In addition, the Committee particularly focuses on competitive pay for railroad executives within the Peer Group and the performance of other comparable railroads. In comparing the executive positions with comparable positions at companies within the Peer Group, the Committee and FW Cook review and consider any adjustments that may be required to account for significant differences in tenure or functional responsibilities.
In determining 2024 target pay opportunities for the NEOs, the Committee considered competitive market information gathered in 2023 from the following 15 company Peer Group:
Canadian National
Canadian Pacific Kansas City
CSX
Deere & Co.
Delta Airlines
Exelon
FedEx
Honeywell International
NextEra Energy
Norfolk Southern
Northrop Grumman
RTX Corp.
Southern Co.
Southwest Airlines
UPS
47

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Compensation Philosophy and the Compensation-Setting Process
The Committee selected this Peer Group with the assistance of its compensation consultant, FW Cook, after considering U.S. based public companies in similar Global Industry Classification System (GICS) Sub-Industries with comparable revenues and market capitalization and other U.S.-based public companies with comparable (i) revenues, (ii) operating income, (iii) total assets, (iv) market capitalization and (v) employees, while excluding pharmaceuticals, high-tech, insurance and financial services companies. These comparative financial measures and the number of employees for the Peer Group are summarized below.
 
PEER GROUP
UNION PACIFIC
 
MEDIAN
75TH PERCENTILE
COMPANY DATA
PERCENTILE RANK
Net Revenue
$28,114
$59,705
$24,119
33rd
Operating Income
$5,558
$6,991
$9,134
84th
Total Assets
$70,857
$102,972
$67,132
47th
Market Capitalization
$71,872
$122,488
$129,706
78th
Employees
74,806
102,000
32,973
44th
Dollars in millions. Median/Percentiles determined by FW Cook using Standard & Poor’s Capital IQ Service, Form 8-K filings and Peer Group company information. The financial information provided above is derived from data as of fiscal year ending December 31, 2023, except as of October 2023 for Deere & Co., and November 2023 for FedEx Corporation. Market Capitalization is a 12-month average as of December 31, 2023.
Compensation Best Practices
We endeavor to maintain strong governance standards in our policies and practices related to executive compensation. Below is a summary of key executive compensation and governance practices in place during 2024.


WHAT
WE DO
Emphasize Performance-Based Variable Compensation
Maintain a Compensation Recoupment Policy that Goes Beyond SEC Requirements
Tie Compensation to Short-and-Long-Term Performance
Allow Only Minimal Perquisites
Utilize Double Trigger Change-in-Control Plan
Target Base Salaries Generally Around the Median of our Peer Group
Enforce Stringent Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines
Conduct Annual Compensation Risk Assessment
Require Trading Plans for Executive Officers (as set forth on page 81) and Directors

WHAT WE
DON’T DO
No Repricing or Back-Dating of Stock Options Allowed
No Individual Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans
No Tax Gross-Up Payments Allowed for NEOs, including on Change-in-Control
No Employment Agreements with any of our Executive Officers
No Pledging or Hedging of Company Stock by NEOs
No Annual Time-Vested RSU Grants to NEOs
48

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Named Executive Officers
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the material elements of our executive compensation program, and the corresponding pay decisions for our 2024 Named Executive Officers (NEOs), who are listed below. The amounts in each NEO’s pie chart below reflect the values in the Summary Compensation Table on page 60.
 
 

V. James Vena
Age: 66 | Tenure: 1.6 years
Chief Executive Officer
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Compensation Decisions for 2024
 
 
 
 
 
Increased base salary by 8%
 
 
 
 
 
Increased annual incentive target by $200,000
 
 
 
 
 
2024 Long-term incentive equity award of $12,000,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mr. Vena was elected Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company (the Railroad), the principal operating subsidiary of the Company, effective August 14, 2023. Mr. Vena previously served as a Senior Advisor to the Chairman of Union Pacific in 2021 and Chief Operating Officer of the Railroad from 2019 to 2020.

The Compensation and Talent Committee increased Mr. Vena’s salary for 2024 to $1,350,000 effective March 1, 2024, and increased his 2024 Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) bonus target to $2,450,000. Mr. Vena received an annual incentive bonus for 2024 of $3,999,013 at 163% of target based on the formulaic bonus program under the Company’s 2024 AIP. The Committee set Mr. Vena’s long-term incentive target grant value at approximately $12,000,000, consisting of 60% PSUs and 40% stock options granted on February 8, 2024.
 
 
 
 
 

Jennifer L. Hamann
Age: 57 | Tenure: 33 years
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
 
 

 
 
 
 
Compensation Decisions for 2024
 
 
 
 
 
Increased base salary by 7.8%
 
 
 
 
 
Annual incentive target remained unchanged
 
 
 
 
 
February 2024 LTI target increased by $150,000
 
 
 
 
 
Increased Total Target Direct Compensation by 5.0%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ms. Hamann was elected Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the Railroad effective January 1, 2020.

The Compensation and Talent Committee increased Ms. Hamann’s salary for 2024 to $690,000 effective March 1, 2024, and maintained her 2024 AIP bonus target at $800,000. Ms. Hamann received an annual incentive bonus for 2024 of $1,305,800 at 163% of target based on the formulaic bonus program under the Company’s 2024 AIP. The Committee increased Ms. Hamann’s long-term incentive target grant value to approximately $2,750,000, consisting of 60% PSUs and 40% stock options granted on February 8, 2024. Ms. Hamann’s 2022 grant of PSUs was earned at 90% of target.
 
 
 
 
49

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Named Executive Officers
 
 


Elizabeth F. Whited
Age: 59 | Tenure: 37 years
President
 
 

 
 
 
 
Compensation Decisions for 2024
 
 
 
 
 
Increased base salary by 6.3%
 
 
 
 
 
Annual incentive target remained unchanged
 
 
 
 
 
2024 Long-term incentive equity award of $4,000,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ms. Whited was elected President of the Company and the Railroad effective August 14, 2023. Ms. Whited has spent over thirty-five years at the Company holding leadership roles across multiple departments. Most recently, Ms. Whited has served as Executive Vice President-Sustainability and Strategy of the Company and the Railroad from February 2022 until August 2023. She previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resource Officer from August 2018 through February 2022 and was responsible for Union Pacific’s human resources and labor relations functions.

In early 2024, the Compensation and Talent Committee increased Ms. Whited’s salary for 2024 to $850,000 effective March 1, 2024, and maintained her 2024 AIP bonus target at $1,000,000. Ms. Whited received an annual incentive bonus for 2024 of $1,632,250 at 163% of target based on the formulaic bonus program under the Company’s 2024 AIP. The Committee set Ms. Whited’s long-term incentive target value at approximately $4,000,000, consisting of 60% PSUs and 40% stock options granted on February 8, 2024. Ms. Whited’s 2022 grant of PSUs was earned at 90% of target.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Eric J. Gehringer
Age: 46 | Tenure: 19 years
Executive Vice President,
Operations
 
 

 
 
 
 
Compensation Decisions for 2024
 
 
 
 
 
Increased base salary by 10.0%
 
 
 
 
 
Annual incentive target remained unchanged
 
 
 
 
 
February 2024 LTI target increased by $250,000
 
 
 
 
 
Increased Total Target Direct Compensation by 8.6%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mr. Gehringer was elected Executive Vice President-Operations of the Company and the Railroad effective January 1, 2021. Mr. Gehringer previously served as Senior Vice President-Transportation from July 2020 to December 2020 and Vice President-Mechanical & Engineering from January 2020 to July 2020.

The Compensation and Talent Committee increased Mr. Gehringer’s salary for 2024 to $660,000 effective March 1, 2024. Mr. Gehringer’s 2024 AIP bonus target remained unchanged at $750,000. Mr. Gehringer received an annual incentive bonus for 2024 of $1,224,188 at 163% of target based on the formulaic bonus program under the Company’s 2024 AIP. The Committee increased Mr. Gehringer’s long-term incentive target grant value to approximately $2,500,000, consisting of 60% PSUs and 40% stock options granted on February 8, 2024. Mr. Gehringer’s 2022 grant of PSUs was earned at 90% of target.

 
 
 
 
50

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Named Executive Officers
 
 

Kenny G. Rocker
Age: 53 | Tenure: 30 years
Executive Vice President,
Marketing and Sales
 
 

 
 
 
 
Compensation Decisions for 2024
 
 
 
 
 
Increased base salary by 9.9%
 
 
 
 
 
Annual incentive target remained unchanged
 
 
 
 
 
February 2024 LTI target increased by $500,000
 
 
 
 
 
Increased Total Target Direct Compensation by 20.0%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mr. Rocker has been Executive Vice President-Marketing and Sales of the Company and the Railroad since August 15, 2018.

The Compensation and Talent Committee increased Mr. Rocker’s salary for 2024 to $555,000 effective March 1, 2024, and maintained his 2024 AIP bonus target at $750,000. Mr. Rocker received an annual incentive bonus for 2024 of $1,224,188 at 163% of target based on the formulaic bonus program under the Company’s 2024 AIP. The Committee increased Mr. Rocker’s long-term incentive target grant value to approximately $2,000,000, consisting of 60% PSUs and 40% stock options granted on February 8, 2024. Mr. Rocker’s 2022 grant of PSUs was earned at 90% of target.

 
 
 
 
Fiscal Year 2024 Total Direct Compensation Mix
The majority of the compensation awarded to our CEO and other NEOs, is performance-based, variable and “at-risk.” These characteristics are illustrated in the charts below that show the pay mix for Mr. Vena, our CEO, and for our other NEOs, as a group based on the Total Target Direct Compensation based on target bonus for these executives in fiscal 2024. The charts below show the pay mix for both Mr. Vena and the other NEOs.

51

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program
Base Salary
The CEO reviews base salaries and prior year performance and accomplishments for the other NEOs and recommends to the Committee a base salary for the coming year for each. The Committee considers and evaluates these base salary recommendations. Among many considerations, the Committee reviews: (i) the executive’s position and responsibility in the organization, (ii) the executive’s experience and expertise, (iii) Company performance, (iv) individual accomplishments and job performance during the year, (v) Peer Group pay data, (vi) internal benchmarking relative to the Company’s pay structure, and (vii) current salary. In making salary recommendations to the Board of Directors, the Committee exercises subjective judgment in evaluating many factors but applies no specific weights to any factor. The Committee, with input from its compensation consultant, and the Board’s review of CEO performance, assesses and determines the base salary of the CEO for subsequent Board approval based on the same considerations described above.
In February 2024 and 2025, the Committee reviewed each of our NEO’s base salary. Upon review of competitive market data, including our Peer Group, the Committee reviewed and recommended the salary increases shown below. The Board approved the Committee’s recommended salary increases.
NAME
2023 SALARY
INCREASE
FOR 2024
2024 SALARY
INCREASE
FOR 2025
2025 SALARY
V. James Vena
$1,250,000
8.0%
$1,350,000
11.1%
$1,500,000
Jennifer L. Hamann
640,000
7.8%
690,000
3.0%
711,000
Elizabeth F. Whited
800,000
6.3%
850,000
850,000
Eric J. Gehringer
600,000
10.0% (1)
660,000
6.1%
700,000
Kenny G. Rocker
505,000
9.9% (2)
555,000
9.9% (2)
610,000
(1)
Mr. Gehringer’s 2024 salary was increased to reflect alignment with the Peer Group as well as his increased responsibilities as Executive Vice President – Operations.
(2)
Mr. Rocker’s salary increases in both 2024 and 2025 were intended to better align with the Peer Group as Executive Vice President – Marketing & Sales.
2024 Annual Incentive Plan
For 2024, seventy percent (70%) of the target annual incentive cash bonuses for the NEOs was based on the attainment of pre-established objective Company financial performance goals, ten percent (10%) on the attainment of pre-established safety goals consisting of the reportable personal injury rate (5%) and the reportable derailment rate (5%) and twenty percent (20%) was based on a shared set of non-formulaic Company goals in key areas such as service performance index for intermodal and manifest, net promoter score, volume growth above market, employee engagement and renewable fuel blend. If the minimum performance thresholds for neither operating income nor operating ratio were achieved, then no annual incentive cash bonus would be paid to executives regardless of performance on the other measures. For performance that exceeded target levels, the annual incentive plan payout was capped at 200% of target.

52

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program
The Committee determined individual annual incentive bonus targets for each of the NEOs such that when added to their base salaries, the resulting Target Total Cash Compensation was generally in the median range of competitive market data. These individual annual incentive bonus targets for each of the NEOs were approved by the Committee and then recommended to the Board and approved in February of 2024.
2024 Target Total Cash Compensation
NAME
2024 SALARY
2024 TARGET BONUS
2024
TARGET TOTAL CASH COMP
V. James Vena
$1,350,000
$2,450,000
$3,800,000
Jennifer L. Hamann
690,000
800,000
1,490,000
Elizabeth F. Whited
850,000
1,000,000
1,850,000
Eric J. Gehringer
660,000
750,000
1,410,000
Kenny G. Rocker
555,000
750,000
1,305,000
Formulaic Component
Annual incentive compensation supports the Committee’s pay-for-performance philosophy and further aligns individual performance with Company goals as set forth in the Company’s annual operating plan. For 2024, the Committee did not change Operating Income and Operating Ratio as the key financial metrics as they are key performance measures in the rail industry and focus our NEO’s performance on operating results.


The table below shows the weighted average annual incentive payout for the NEOs given the Company’s 2024 year-end results relative to the Operating Income, Operating Ratio, Reportable Personal Injury Rate, and Reportable Derailment Rate targets approved in February 2024.
Full Year 2024 Annual Incentive Plan Results
 
Threshold
25% Payout
Target
100% Payout
Maximum
200% Payout
2024
Plan Results
Performance
Achieved Weighted
Average Payout
Company Performance
(Formulaic 80%)

Operating Income – 35%
$8,400
$9,400
​$10,500
$9,713
45%
Operating Ratio – 35%
64.0%
62.0%
​60.0%
60.1%(1)
68%
Reportable Personal Injury Rate – 5%
1.17
1.11
1.05
0.90
10%
Reportable Derailment
Rate – 5%
2.72
2.58
​2.45
2.17
10%
Strategic Scorecard
(Non-Formulaic 20%)
Strategic Scorecard – 20%
25%
100%
​200%
150%
30%
(1)
The 2024 Annual Incentive Plan design provides for an adjustment to Operating Ratio for the reported fuel expense and fuel revenue from the actual price to the price assumed in the Board approved financial plan. This adjustment neutralizes the impact of fuel price fluctuations during the year.
53

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program
Non-Formulaic Component
The non-formulaic component of the 2024 Annual Incentive Plan provides that twenty percent (20%) of the target annual incentive cash bonuses for the NEOs is based on a shared set of Company goals in key areas such as service performance index for intermodal and manifest, net promoter score, volume growth above market, employee engagement and renewable fuel blend. The Committee assessed the individual strategic scorecard items shown below without assigning a particular weighting to any one item.
2024 Strategic Scorecard
 
Manifest Service Performance Index
Improved Year-Over-Year
Intermodal Service Performance Index
Improved Year-Over-Year
Net Promoter Score
Exceeded Goal
Volume Growth Above Market
Exceeded Goal
Employee Engagement
  Met Goal
Renewable Fuel Blend Percentage
Exceeded Goal
The Committee considered the following in its evaluation of the above strategic scorecard items:
The Service Performance Index (SPI) for both manifest and intermodal improved compared to 2023. Intermodal SPI improved 2 points in 2024 at the same time international volume unexpectedly surged, and Manifest SPI improved 4 points.
Net promoter score improved year-over-year and exceeded the Company’s set goal.
Volume growth above market included the Committee’s evaluation of multiple economic indicators compared to carload volume.
The Company exceeded its participation goal in the employee engagement survey with an 86% participation rate and included the Committee’s evaluation of the Company’s employee engagement score which improved 5 points compared to 2023. The Company slightly missed its top talent and craft professional retention goals.
The Company also exceeded its goal for renewable fuel blend percentage with a 5.2% biofuel blend.
Based on the Committee’s evaluation of the Company’s achievement of the strategic scorecard items, the Committee awarded this component at 150% of target for each of the NEOs.
The table below reflects the aggregate actual performance incentive cash bonus reported for each of the NEOs for 2024.
 
 
ACTUAL
 
 
NAME
2024 TARGET BONUS
OPERATING
INCOME
35%
OPERATING
RATIO
35%
REPORTABLE
PERSONAL
INJURY RATE
5%
REPORTABLE
DERAILMENT
RATE
5%
STRATEGIC
SCORECARD
20%
2024 TOTAL
ANNUAL INCENTIVE
BONUS
2024 OVERALL
PAYOUT
(AS A % OF
TARGET)
V. James Vena
$2,450,000
$1,101,888
$1,672,125
$245,000
$245,000
$735,000
$3,999,013
163%
Jennifer L. Hamann
800,000
359,800
546,000
80,000
80,000
240,000
1,305,800
163%
Elizabeth F. Whited
1,000,000
449,750
682,500
100,000
100,000
300,000
1,632,250
163%
Eric J. Gehringer
750,000
337,313
511,875
75,000
75,000
225,000
1,224,188
163%
Kenny G. Rocker
750,000
337,313
511,875
75,000
75,000
225,000
1,224,188
163%
54

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program
Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation
The components of our long-term incentive (LTI) compensation are:

Performance Stock Units

Performance stock units are payable based on the attainment and certification of:
• 
Two-thirds (2/3) average annual Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) for a three-year performance period (Performance Period)
• 
One-third (1/3) Operating Income Growth (OIG) over the Performance Period as compared to the OIG of the companies in the S&P 100 Industrials Index and the Class I Railroads

Stock Options

Stock option awards become fully exercisable if the executive remains an employee through a three-year vesting period. One-third of each stock option grant vests each year over the three-year vesting period.
The Committee generally seeks to make long-term incentives the largest element of each NEO’s Target Total Direct Compensation opportunity. In setting the size of LTI awards, the Committee considers the individual performance of the NEO as well as the Total Target Direct Compensation opportunities of similarly situated executives of the Company’s Peer Group and competitive market information from third party compensation surveys. The CEO recommends to the Committee an aggregate value of LTI awards for each of the NEOs other than himself, which is a determination reserved for the Committee, taking into account advice from its compensation consultant and the Board’s evaluation of the CEO. The Committee considers these recommendations and determines the final amounts awarded to each NEO. The Committee may vary the mix of each component of equity compensation to some degree depending on Company and individual performance and retention risk regarding an executive.
The LTI awards granted by the Committee in February 2024 reflected the Committee’s desire to provide long-term incentive compensation to ensure the continued efforts of the NEOs to meet the long-term goals and strategic plans of the Company and to align this element of their compensation with the long-term interests of the Company’s shareholders. The Committee increased Ms. Hamman’s, Mr. Gehringer’s and Mr. Rocker’s target LTI award opportunities for 2024 to incentivize the continued growth of each in their respective roles and to better align their compensation with the competitive market rates. Ms. Whited’s 2024 target LTI award was established in August 2023 upon her promotion to President. Mr. Vena’s 2024 target LTI award was established in August 2023 when he was hired as Chief Executive Officer.
The LTI awards for the NEOs and a description of the terms of these awards are set forth on pages 62 and 63 in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2024 Table and accompanying narrative discussion.
Performance Stock Units
In February 2022, February 2023 and February 2024, the Committee granted the NEOs performance stock units (PSUs), two-thirds (2/3) of which are payable based on the attainment and certification of average annual return on invested capital (ROIC) for a three-year performance period (Performance Period) and one-third (1/3) of which are payable based on the attainment and certification of our operating income growth (OIG) over the Performance Period as compared to the OIG of the companies in the S&P 100 Industrials Index and the Class I Railroads. Payout of the 2022, 2023 and 2024 PSUs may be zero if threshold goals are not achieved or may range from 25% to 200% of the target number of stock units. The threshold, target and maximum number of 2024 PSUs that may be earned by each NEO is set forth on page 62 in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2024 Table.
We define ROIC as net operating profit after taxes, divided by average invested capital. The Committee may adjust ROIC to reflect the effect of special or strategic transactions or events, such as excluding the impact of significant gains on sales of real estate, tax adjustments, accounting charges, or reclassifications. The Committee selected ROIC because it is one of our key measurements that indicates success in making long-term capital investment decisions that improve financial and operational performance and increase shareholder value. In addition, the Board emphasizes ROIC as a key focus area for the Company.
55

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program
The ROIC performance criteria are set based on thoughtful analysis of current and projected business levels and changes in the economic environment that may impact the Company’s ability to achieve levels of return reported in previous periods. For PSUs granted in 2024, the Committee recommended Board approval of our ROIC target at 15.5%. The Committee also considered returns commensurate with other Class I railroads and large-cap industrial companies.
PERFORMANCE PERIOD
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
ROIC
THRESHOLD
ROIC
TARGET
ROIC MAXIMUM
2022 – 2024
2/3 ROIC and 1/3 Relative OIG
13.0%
17.0%
19.5%
2023 – 2025
2/3 ROIC and 1/3 Relative OIG
13.0%
17.0%
19.5%
2024 – 2026
2/3 ROIC and 1/3 Relative OIG
12.0%
15.5%
18.0%
The Committee selected relative OIG because it aligns with the Company’s objective of profitable growth. The table below summarizes the payout schedule for the relative OIG component of PSUs based on the Company’s operating income growth percentile compared to the OIG of the companies in the S&P 100 Industrials Index and the Class I Railroads. Payout will be linearly interpolated for performance between levels.
OPERATING INCOME
GROWTH (PERCENTILE)
PAYOUT
(% OF EARNED SHARES)
25%
25%
50%
100%
75%
150%
90%
200%
For PSUs granted in 2022, 2023 and 2024, if the Company does not meet the threshold ROIC and OIG level for the three-year performance period, executives will not earn any performance stock units on that component. Additionally, if the Company’s absolute annualized OIG for the Performance Period is below 2%, the payout on this component is capped at 100% of target.
The Committee certified the ROIC results as shown in the graph below for performance years 2022-2024.

*
ROIC is not considered a financial measure under GAAP by SEC Regulation G and Item 10 of SEC Regulation S-K and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner. For a reconciliation to GAAP, please see Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.
In February 2025, the PSUs granted for the 2022-2024 performance period were settled at an overall payout of 90% of target. Three-year average ROIC was 16.2%, resulting in an 85% of target payout for two-thirds (2/3) of the award. Relative OIG was 65th percentile for the Performance Period, which would have resulted in payout of 130% of target for one-third (1/3) of the award, but because our absolute OIG was below 2%, this component was capped at 100% of target. The resulting weighted payout was 90% of target.
PSUs earned under the 2022 grants for each of the NEOs are included as Earned Performance Stock Units in the Stock Awards column of the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2024 Fiscal Year-End Table on page 65.
The table below summarizes how the PSUs granted in 2022 were earned, and how the performance stock units granted in 2023 and 2024 are tracking as of the end of 2024.
PERFORMANCE PERIOD
AVERAGE ROIC
RELATIVE
OPERATING
INCOME GROWTH
(PERCENTILE RANK)
PERCENT OF TARGET
ACHIEVED TO DATE
PERCENT OF TARGET EARNED
2022 – 2024
16.2%
65th
90%
90% of the target number of stock units
2023 – 2025
15.7%
52nd
N/A
No stock units earned until the end of the performance period
2024 – 2026
16.0%
59th
N/A
No stock units earned until the end of the performance period
56

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program
2025 Compensation Decisions
In February 2025, the Compensation and Talent Committee reviewed and recommended approval to the Board the following compensation changes for the NEOs that were then approved by the Board. The Board of Directors reviewed and approved Mr. Vena’s compensation. Adjustments were based on the same factors considered in prior years for each pay element, as described throughout this CD&A.
The following table summarizes adjustments made to CEO and other NEO compensation for 2025.
NAME
Annual Base Salary Increase %
Target Annual Incentive
Target Long-Term Incentive
V. James Vena
11.1%
+50,000
+3,000,000
Jennifer L. Hamann
3.0%
No change
+$250,000
Elizabeth F. Whited
No change
No change
Eric J. Gehringer
6.1%
No change
+$250,000
Kenny G. Rocker
9.9%
No change
+$250,000
Other Compensation
Perquisites
The Committee reviews perquisites periodically for both appropriateness and effectiveness. Key executives, including the NEOs, receive tax and financial counseling services and personal excess liability coverage.
Our Board approved policy regarding use of corporate aircraft states that the CEO should use corporate aircraft whenever reasonably possible for all air travel (both business and personal) for the safety, security and immediate availability of the CEO. The annual limit for personal flights for the CEO is $200,000. The personal limit for the other NEOs is $45,000. The CEO and the other NEOs will pay for any personal flights beyond these limits in accordance with applicable tax rules and regulations and Federal Aviation Administration rules and regulations, as stated in the Company’s policy regarding use of corporate aircraft. Income is imputed to the CEO and NEOs for personal travel that is not reimbursed by the executive and tax gross-ups are not provided. All use of Company aircraft must be approved in advance by the CEO or a specifically authorized designee. During 2024, all NEOs were in compliance with the Company’s aircraft policy.
The value of perquisites provided to the NEOs by the Company is not a significant portion of any of the NEOs’ compensation on an annual basis. Due to the relatively low cost to the Company of these perquisites, combined with the policy regarding use of Company aircraft, the Committee does not consider perquisites in its analyses of Total Direct Compensation for the CEO and the other NEOs.
Deferred Compensation
The Committee, pursuant to its charter, is responsible for oversight of our deferred compensation arrangements. Management and the Committee believe that deferred compensation arrangements are important benefits that contribute to the Company’s competitive compensation arrangements and help attract and retain executives. The Company’s deferred compensation programs allow for elective deferrals of (i) salary, (ii) bonus (iii) performance stock units, and (iv) retention stock units, which accrue earnings during the deferral period as described on page 70. These deferrals are not funded and there are no mechanisms in place (such as insurance or trusts) to protect the executives from any inability of the Company to pay these amounts in the future. More detailed descriptions of the features of our non-qualified deferred compensation plans begin on page 69. In addition to these non-qualified deferred compensation benefits, the Company allows its executives to participate in its tax qualified 401(k) plan on terms and conditions similar to the Company’s other employees.
Pension Plan and Supplemental Pension Plan
The Company sponsors a tax-qualified defined benefit Pension Plan and a non-qualified excess Supplemental Pension Plan. Management and the Committee believe that the defined benefit Pension Plan and the Supplemental Pension Plan (with respect to our executives, including the NEOs) provide employees eligible to participate with a competitive retirement benefit. The Company offers the Supplemental Pension Plan to allow executives to receive pension benefits for compensation and benefits that exceed government imposed limits applicable to defined benefit plans and to allow for the inclusion of compensation that has been deferred, which cannot be included as compensation under the defined benefit Pension Plan. Benefit amounts are based on the employee’s years of service, salary, bonus and age. More detailed descriptions of the Pension Plan and Supplemental Pension Plan are set forth on pages 67 and 69.
57

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program
Other Policies and Considerations
Change-in-Control Arrangements
The NEOs do not have individual severance agreements or employment agreements with the Company. In November 2000, the Board adopted the Union Pacific Corporation Key Employee Continuity Plan (the Continuity Plan). The purpose of the Continuity Plan is to assure the smooth transition of management and effective operation of the Company in the event of a change-in-control by providing (i) sufficient economic security to allow key executives to focus on overall shareholder value without concern about personal financial interests and (ii) severance benefits in the event their employment with the Company is terminated within two years following a change-in-control.
The Continuity Plan provides severance benefits to certain senior level executives, including the NEOs, in the event (i) a change-in-control occurs and (ii) the covered executive is involuntarily terminated or constructively discharged within two years following the change-in-control. This “double-trigger” requirement will allow the new controlling party to retain certain executives and terminate others with the obligation to provide the benefits set forth in the Continuity Plan. Severance benefits are the same for all covered executives, except for the multiple used to determine an executive’s lump-sum severance payment. The lump-sum severance payment is equal to three times the sum of base salary plus the average of the annual bonus payments earned in the three most recent calendar years for Mr. Vena and two times this sum for each of Ms. Hamann, Ms. Whited, Mr. Rocker and Mr. Gehringer. The Committee determined these multiples based upon competitive practices at the time the plan was adopted.
The Continuity Plan does not provide for any tax gross-ups. As a result, none of the Company’s executives, including the NEOs, are eligible to receive any excise tax gross-up on any severance payment received under the Continuity Plan.
In December 2021, the Committee recommended, and the Board approved the following changes to the Continuity Plan in the event of a qualifying termination of employment following a change-in-control: the elimination of the automatic vesting and receipt of an additional three years of age and service credit in the Company’s Supplemental Pension Plan, proration of the current year’s annual incentive bonus and the addition of best net treatment for excise taxes associated with Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code).
In September 2003, the Board adopted the Union Pacific Corporation Policy Regarding Shareholder Approval of Future Severance Agreements (Severance Policy). Under this Severance Policy, the Company agreed not to enter into a future severance agreement with a senior executive that provides for benefits in an amount generally exceeding 2.99 times salary plus bonus unless such agreement is approved by a vote of our shareholders.
Payments and certain severance benefits for the NEOs upon a change-in-control, as well as a description of the Continuity Plan are set forth on pages 72 through 73.
Recoupment Policy
On September 28, 2023, the Board approved the Company’s amended and restated Policy for Recoupment of Certain Compensation (the Policy) which became effective October 2, 2023. The Policy applies to any incentive-based compensation (defined as any compensation granted, earned, or vested based in whole or part on the Company’s attainment of a financial reporting measure) or other incentive compensation (covering any compensation under the Company’s Executive Incentive Plan (or successor plan) or under one of the Company’s applicable stock plans, including long-term incentive equity awards) received on or after October 2, 2023 and the Company’s prior recoupment policy applies to incentive compensation awarded on or after January 1, 2020 and received before October 2, 2023. The Policy complies with the listing standards adopted by the New York Stock Exchange that implemented the SEC’s finalized Exchange Act Rule 10D-1.
The Policy requires that, in the event of a financial restatement due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the federal securities laws, the Company will recover from each covered executive (specified as any executive officer of the Company as defined under Rule 10D-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) on a reasonably prompt basis the amount of any excess incentive-based compensation received by such covered executive during the recovery period (as defined in the Policy). Additionally, in the event the Company is required to prepare such a financial restatement the Compensation and Talent Committee may, in its sole discretion, require other Company executives to repay to the Company any excess incentive-based compensation received by such executive during the recovery period.
The Policy also provides that the Committee may, in its sole discretion, require a covered executive or other executive who has engaged in certain types of detrimental conduct, as more particularly described in the Policy, to repay to the Company any incentive compensation received during the recovery period.
Deductibility of Grandfathered Compensation
Due to the amendment to Section 162(m) of the Code, compensation paid to covered employees in excess of $1 million will not be deductible unless it qualifies for transition relief available for certain arrangements in place on November 2, 2017 (Grandfathered Compensation).
58

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program
Compensation and Talent Committee Report
The Committee reviewed and discussed with management the CD&A and based on that review and discussion, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the CD&A be included in the Company’s 2025 Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.
The Compensation and Talent Committee
William J. DeLaney, Chair*
Sheri H. Edison
Deborah C. Hopkins
Doyle R. Simons**
*
Chair until March 25, 2025
**
Chair effective March 26, 2025
59

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Compensation
Summary Compensation Table
The following table provides a summary of compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to the NEOs, including salary, bonus, the value of stock awards and option awards and other compensation for 2024, 2023 and 2022.
NAME AND
PRINCIPAL POSITION
YEAR
SALARY
BONUS
STOCK
AWARDS
(a)
OPTION
AWARDS
(b)
NON-EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN
COMPENSATION
CHANGE IN
PENSION
VALUE AND
NONQUALIFIED
DEFERRED
COMPENSATION
EARNINGS (c)
ALL OTHER
COMPENSATION
(d)
TOTAL
COMPENSATION
V. James Vena
Chief Executive Officer
2024
$1,333,333
$0
$7,200,104
$4,800,092
$3,999,013
$0(f)
$312,221
$17,644,763
2023
477,151
1,406,250(e)
0
0
0
0(f)
133,947
2,017,348
Jennifer L. Hamann
EVP & Chief
Financial Officer
2024
681,667
0
1,650,174
1,100,075
1,305,800
—(g)
34,712
4,772,428
2023
633,333
0
1,560,015
1,040,107
320,000
895,790
23,543
4,472,788
2022
591,667
0
1,500,065
1,000,089
328,500
—(g)
37,466
3,457,787
Elizabeth F. Whited
President
2024
841,667
0
2,400,118
1,600,092
1,632,250
—(g)
36,061
6,510,188
2023
644,355
0
1,050,150
700,119
341,667
920,130
27,189
3,683,610
2022
523,000
0
1,050,216
700,109
338,500
—(g)
44,855
2,656,680
Eric J. Gehringer
EVP Operations
2024
650,000
0
1,500,136
1,000,035
1,224,188
28,950
38,105
4,441,414
2023
579,167
0
1,350,106
900,112
300,000
342,336
28,185
3,499,906
2022
467,500
0
900,185
600,116
323,500
—(g)
23,900
2,315,201
Kenny G. Rocker
EVP Marketing & Sales
2024
546,667
0
1,200,059
800,139
1,224,188
—(g)
23,678
3,794,731
2023
500,000
0
900,071
600,123
300,000
571,679
30,414
2,902,287
2022
470,833
0
900,185
600,116
335,500
—(g)
27,241
2,333,875
(a)
Amounts reported in the Stock Awards column reflect grant date fair values as calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, including performance stock units which are valued based on target performance achieved. Refer to the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2024 Table on page 62 for the separate grant date fair values of performance stock units granted in 2024. The grant date fair value is calculated on the number of performance stock units at target multiplied by the closing stock price on the date of grant. Dividend equivalents that accrue or are payable on earned performance stock units are reflected in the grant date fair value of such awards and, therefore, pursuant to SEC rules, are not separately reported in the Summary Compensation Table when actually paid to the NEOs. The maximum value of performance stock units for 2024 for Mr. Vena is $14,400,208, for Ms. Hamann is $3,300,348, for Ms. Whited is $4,800,236, for Mr. Gehringer is $3,000,272, and for Mr. Rocker is $2,400,118.
(b)
Amounts reported in the Option Awards column reflect grant date fair value as calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The following table shows the assumptions used to calculate the grant date fair value of Option Awards.
 
February 8, 2024
February 9, 2023
February 3, 2022   
Risk-free interest rate
4.2%
3.9%
1.6%
Dividend yield
2.1%
2.6%
1.9%
Expected life (years)
4.4
4.5
4.4
Volatility
28.7%
29.3%
28.7%
Grant date fair value per option of options granted
$61.75
$48.31
$51.92
(c)
The amounts reported are the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit under the Company’s Pension Plan and Supplemental Pension Plan. The pension values fluctuate due to changes in the discount rate, discount period, and the value of the accrued annual pension benefit for each NEO. If the discount rate and discount period assumptions had not changed, the increase in the present value of the accrued annual pension benefit would have been $109,939 for Ms. Hamann, $284,926 for Ms. Whited, $200,463 for Mr. Gehringer, and $67,513 for Mr. Rocker. These assumption changes have no impact on the actual pension benefits payable under the Company’s defined benefit pension plans.
60

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Compensation
(d)
The following table provides a summary of the All Other Compensation column that includes all perquisites.
Summary of All Other Compensation
 
 
PERQUISITES
 
 
 
NAME AND
PRINCIPAL POSITION
YEAR
USE OF
CORPORATE
AIRCRAFT (x)
TAX AND
FINANCIAL
COUNSELING
SERVICES
EXCESS
LIABILITY
PREMIUM
COMPANY-
MATCHED
THRIFT PLAN
CONTRIBUTIONS
RELOCATION
TOTAL ALL
OTHER
COMPENSATION
V. James Vena
Chief Executive Officer
2024
$174,416
$15,000
$2,805
$120,000
$0
$312,221
2023
58,094
0
0
26,071
49,782(y)
133,947
Jennifer L. Hamann
EVP & Chief
Financial Officer
2024
9,046
2,411
2,805
20,450
0
34,712
2023
810
1,873
1,860
19,000
0
23,543
2022
15,864
1,992
1,860
17,750
0
37,466
Elizabeth F. Whited
President
2024
1,356
6,650
2,805
25,250
0
36,061
2023
1,418
4,580
1,860
19,331
0
27,189
2022
19,287
8,018
1,860
15,690
0
44,855
Eric J. Gehringer
EVP Operations
2024
9,177
6,623
2,805
19,500
0
38,105
2023
0
8,950
1,860
17,375
0
28,185
2022
0
8,015
1,860
14,025
0
23,900
Kenny G. Rocker
EVP Marketing & Sales
2024
5,713
4,810
2,805
10,350
0
23,678
2023
7,047
6,507
1,860
15,000
0
30,414
2022
9,456
1,800
1,860
14,125
0
27,241
(x)
The aggregate incremental cost for use of Company aircraft is computed by multiplying the variable cost per air mile by the number of miles used for travel other than for Company business (including empty plane miles). The variable cost per air mile is the cost incurred for flying the plane divided by the number of miles flown. Costs may include jet fuel, catering, or pilot personal expenses. Under the Company’s aircraft policy, allowance for personal use of Company aircraft for the CEO is limited to $200,000.
(y)
In August 2023, Mr. Vena relocated to Omaha, Nebraska in connection with his election as CEO. The Company’s relocation package elements include monetary allowances and moving services to help employees relocate. The packages are designed to meet the business needs of the Company and the personal needs of employees and their families. All management employees are eligible for relocation packages in connection with a qualifying relocation based on set criteria such as distance and duration of the assignment, destination for the assignment, family size, and other needs as applicable.
(e)
Upon his election as CEO on August 14, 2023, the Compensation and Talent Committee set Mr. Vena’s 2023 Annual Incentive Plan bonus target at $2,250,000, pro-rated to reflect his partial-year service, and the Committee provided that his 2023 annual incentive bonus payout would not be less than the pro-rated annual incentive plan bonus target. Following the end of the year, the Committee awarded Mr. Vena an annual incentive bonus for 2023 of $1,406,250, which reflects 150% of his annual incentive bonus target, pro-rated for the year.
(f)
Mr. Vena was elected after January 1, 2018, and like other employees hired after this date, receives a comprehensive thrift plan benefit instead of the Company’s combined thrift plan and pension plan offering.
(g)
In 2024, the change in pension value was a negative $183,925 for Ms. Hamann, a negative $5,205 for Ms. Whited, and a negative $195,580 for Mr. Rocker. In 2022, the change in pension value was a negative $208,493 for Ms. Hamann, a negative $2,071,311 for Ms. Whited, a negative $312,478 for Mr. Gehringer, and a negative $976,218 for Mr. Rocker.
61

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Compensation
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2024
The following table sets forth additional information concerning grants of plan-based awards to our NEOs in 2024.
NAME AND
PRINCIPAL
POSITION
GRANT
DATE
AWARD
TYPE
ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS
UNDER NON-EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS
ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS
UNDER EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS
ALL OTHER
STOCK
AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
SHARES OF
STOCK
OR UNITS
ALL OTHER
OPTION
AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
OPTIONS
EXERCISE
OR BASE
PRICE
OF
OPTION
AWARDS
(a)
GRANT
DATE
FAIR
VALUE
OF STOCK
AND
OPTION
AWARDS
(b)
THRESHOLD
TARGET
MAXIMUM
THRESHOLD
TARGET
MAXIMUM
V. James Vena
Chief Executive Officer
2/8/2024
Performance Stock Units
 
 
 
7,234
28,937
57,874
 
 
 
$7,200,104
2/8/2024
Stock Options
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
77,730
$248.82
4,800,092
 
Annual Incentive
$612,500
$2,450,000
$4,900,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jennifer L. Hamann EVP & Chief Financial Officer
2/8/2024
Performance Stock Units
 
 
 
1,658
6,632
13,264
 
 
 
1,650,174
2/8/2024
Stock Options
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
17,814
248.82
1,100,075
 
Annual Incentive
200,000
800,000
1,600,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Elizabeth F. Whited President
2/8/2024
Performance Stock Units
 
 
 
2,412
9,646
19,292
 
 
 
2,400,118
2/8/2024
Stock Options
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
25,911
248.82
1,600,092
 
Annual Incentive
250,000
1,000,000
2,000,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Eric J. Gehringer
EVP Operations
2/8/2024
Performance Stock Units
 
 
 
1,507
6,029
12,058
 
 
 
1,500,136
2/8/2024
Stock Options
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
16,194
248.82
1,000,035
 
Annual Incentive
187,500
750,000
1,500,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Kenny G. Rocker
EVP Marketing & Sales
2/8/2024
Performance Stock Units
 
 
 
1,206
4,823
9,646
 
 
 
1,200,059
2/8/2024
Stock Options
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12,957
248.82
800,139
 
Annual Incentive
187,500
750,000
1,500,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(a)
The Exercise Price is the closing price of our common stock on February 8, 2024, the date of grant.
(b)
Amounts reported reflect grant date fair value as calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Performance Stock Units are valued based on target performance achieved. Refer to Footnote (b) to the Summary Compensation Table on page 60 for the assumptions made in calculating the grant date fair value of Stock Options.
62

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Compensation
Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of
Plan-Based Awards Table
Annual bonuses are awarded under the Executive Incentive Plan, which allows the Committee to establish performance objectives annually in order to adjust to the changing business climate; provided that annual bonuses may not exceed 0.25% of operating income for the CEO or 0.15% of operating income for each other “covered employee” as defined under Rule 3b-7 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Committee determines incentive bonuses for the NEOs through a combination of pre-established financial performance and safety goals and an evaluation of strategic business objectives, as more fully described beginning on page 52.
On February 8, 2024, the Committee granted performance stock units (PSUs) and stock options to each of the NEOs. PSUs actually earned will be subject to continued employment through February 8, 2027. After the three-year Performance Period covering fiscal years 2024 through 2026, the executive may earn up to two times the target number of PSUs granted to that executive based on two-thirds (2/3) average annual return on invested capital (ROIC) and one-third (1/3) Operating Income Growth (OIG) over the Performance Period as compared to the OIG of the companies in the S&P 100 Industrials Index and the Class I Railroads.
If the Company does not meet the threshold ROIC level and OIG level for the three-year performance period, executives will not earn any PSUs on that component. Additionally, if the Company’s absolute annualized OIG for the performance period is below 2%, the payout on this component is capped at 100% of target. Prior to the satisfaction of the ROIC and OIG performance criteria and the continued employment requirement, the Company does not pay dividend equivalents on the PSUs. Rather, dividend equivalents accrue during the performance and vesting period and are only paid when and to the extent the underlying PSU is earned.
PSUs that have been earned over the three-year performance period will be paid out in Company common stock following the executive’s satisfaction of the continued employment requirement. In addition, a participant may elect to defer the payment of the stock units earned pursuant to the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan described on page 70. If the stock units are deferred, associated dividend equivalents paid on or after the date such stock units are earned also are deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan.
Stock option grants vest annually in equal one-third installments over a three-year period from the grant date of February 8, 2024. The maximum term of stock options is 10 years. Vesting of stock option grants is subject to continued employment through each applicable vesting date. Vesting or forfeiture of these awards may occur upon termination of employment or a change-in-control as described further below and in the Potential Payments Upon Separation from Service, Change-In-Control or Death or Disability section below.
As part of the February 2024 grants of PSUs and stock options, the Committee provided for the lapse of the continued employment requirement applicable to the award if an executive attains age 62 with 10 years of service under the Company pension plan, so long as the executive remained employed until September 30 in the year of grant. This same provision was contained in the stock award agreements for non-executive employees.
Mr. Vena’s 2024 PSU and Stock Option Awards. To recognize that Mr. Vena came out of retirement to serve as CEO, the Committee provided that upon a qualified retirement Mr. Vena’s February 2024 PSU and stock option awards will continue to vest in full, with PSUs eligible to be earned based on actual performance over the full performance period, and his vested stock options will remain exercisable for five years from the date of retirement. For these purposes, a qualified retirement will be deemed to occur if Mr. Vena has served at least two years from the date he commenced service as CEO, provided he gives at least 180 days’ notice of his retirement and assists in the transition of his role to his successor.
Policies and Practices Related to the Grant of Certain Equity Awards Close in Time to the Release of Material Nonpublic Information
Stock option grants to our NEOs are made annually at the February Compensation and Talent Committee meeting each year, and the grants are effective on the next day after approval by the Board as shown in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Fiscal Year 2024 Table and as reflected in the table below. It has been the Company’s long-standing practice that stock options are granted on this predetermined schedule. Our policy is to not grant stock options or similar awards in anticipation of the release of material nonpublic information that is likely to result in changes to the price of our common stock, such as a significant positive or negative earnings announcement, and we do not time the public release of such information based on stock option grant dates.
It has also been our longstanding practice to file the Company’s Form 10-K after review and approval by the Board at its February meeting. The Company’s earnings release for the fourth quarter of the prior year is in late January.
During the period covered by this report, we have not timed the disclosure of material nonpublic information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation.
63

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Compensation
Fiscal Year 2024 Grants of Certain Equity Awards Close in Time to the Release of Material Nonpublic Information
During the fiscal year ended 2024, each of our NEOs were awarded options with an effective grant date during any period beginning four business days before the filing or furnishing of a Form 10-Q, Form 10-K or Form 8-K that disclosed material nonpublic information, and ending one business day after the filing or furnishing of such reports, as summarized in the table below:
 
Grant Date
Number of Securities
Underlying the Award
Exercise Price
of the Award
($/Sh)
Grant Date Fair Value
of the Award
(a)
Percentage Change in the Closing Market Price of the Securities
Underlying the Award Between the Trading Day Ending
Immediately Prior to the Disclosure of Material Nonpublic
Information and the Trading Day Beginning Immediately
Following the Disclosure of Material Nonpublic Information (b)
V. James Vena
Chief Executive
Officer
2/8/2024
77,730
$248.82
$4,800,092
(0.6)%
Jennifer L. Hamann
EVP & Chief
Financial Officer
2/8/2024
17,814
248.82
1,100,075
(0.6)%
Elizabeth F. Whited
President
2/8/2024
25,911
248.82
1,600,092
(0.6)%
Eric J. Gehringer
EVP Operations
2/8/2024
16,194
248.82
1,000,035
(0.6)%
Kenny G. Rocker
EVP Marketing &
Sales
2/8/2024
12,957
248.82
800,139
(0.6)%
(a)
Amounts reported in this column reflect grant date fair values as calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.
(b)
The percentage change was determined using the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on February 8, 2024 of $248.82, which is also the trading day ending immediately prior to the Company’s filing of its 2024 Form 10-K, and the closing stock price of $247.40 on February 12, 2024, the trading day beginning immediately following the filing of the 2024 Form 10-K.
64

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Compensation
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2024 Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth additional information concerning Option Awards and Stock Awards held by the NEOs as of our most recent fiscal year-end, including awards granted during 2024 and described in the tables above.
 
OPTION AWARDS
STOCK AWARDS
 
 
 
 
 
EARNED PERFORMANCE
STOCK UNITS AND
RETENTION UNITS
PERFORMANCE
STOCK UNITS
NAME AND PRINCIPAL
POSITION
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS
(EXERCISABLE)
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS
(UNEXERCISABLE)
(a)
OPTION
EXERCISE
PRICE
OPTION
EXPIRATION
DATE
NUMBER
OF SHARES
OR UNITS
OF STOCK
HELD
THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED
(a)
MARKET
VALUE OF
SHARES OR
UNITS OF
STOCK
HELD
THAT
HAVE
NOT VESTED
(b)
EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
UNEARNED
SHARES, UNITS,
OR OTHER RIGHTS
THAT HAVE
NOT VESTED
(a)
EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS:
MARKET OR
PAYOUT
VALUE OF
UNEARNED
SHARES, UNITS,
OR OTHER
RIGHTS THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED
(b)
V. James Vena Chief Executive Officer
0
77,730
$248.82
2/8/2034
28,937
$6,598,793
Jennifer L. Hamann EVP & Chief Financial Officer
17,814
248.82
2/8/2034
5,525
$1,259,921
14,324
3,326,445
7,177
14,354
202.81
2/9/2033
 
 
 
 
12,842
6,421
244.35
2/3/2032
 
 
 
 
20,013
204.45
2/4/2031
 
 
 
 
19,881
186.11
2/6/2030
 
 
 
 
5,271
161.57
2/7/2029
 
 
 
 
7,743
124.86
2/8/2028
 
 
 
 
Elizabeth F. Whited President
0
25,911
248.82
2/8/2034
3,868
882,059
14,824
3,380,465
4,831
9,662
202.81
2/9/2033
 
 
 
 
8,990
4,495
244.35
2/3/2032
 
 
 
 
15,012
0
204.45
2/4/2031
 
 
 
 
18,639
0
186.11
2/6/2030
 
 
 
 
7,500
0
161.57
2/7/2029
 
 
 
 
Eric J. Gehringer EVP Operations
0
16,194
248.82
2/8/2034
3,316
756,181
12,686
2,892,915
6,211
12,422
202.81
2/9/2033
 
 
 
 
7,706
3,853
244.35
2/3/2032
 
 
 
 
10,008
0
204.45
2/4/2031
 
 
 
 
5,592
0
186.11
2/6/2030
 
 
 
 
5,271
0
161.57
2/7/2029
 
 
 
 
Kenny G. Rocker EVP Marketing & Sales
0
12,957
248.82
2/8/2034
3,316
756,181
9,261
2,111,878
4,141
8,282
202.81
2/9/2033
 
 
 
 
7,706
3,853
244.35
2/3/2032
 
 
 
 
14,010
0
204.45
2/4/2031
 
 
 
 
15,531
0
186.11
2/6/2030
 
 
 
 
11,856
0
161.57
2/7/2029
 
 
 
 
(a)
The following table reflects the scheduled vesting dates for all unvested stock options as shown in the Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (Unexercisable) column, unvested stock units as shown in the Number of Shares or Units of Stock Held That Have Not Vested column and unearned performance units as shown in the Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested column in the above table.
65

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Compensation
NAME AND PRINCIPAL
POSITION
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
AND UNVESTED
OPTIONS
(i)
OPTION
VEST
DATE
OPTION
EXPIRATION
DATE
NUMBER OF
UNITS OF STOCK
HELD THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED
(ii)
UNEARNED
PERFORMANCE
UNITS
(iii)
UNIT
VEST
DATE
V. James Vena
Chief Executive Officer
25,910
2/8/2027
2/8/2034
 
28,937
2/8/2027
25,910
2/8/2026
2/8/2034
 
 
 
25,910
2/8/2025
2/8/2034
 
 
 
Jennifer L. Hamann
EVP & Chief Financial Officer
5,938
2/8/2027
2/8/2034
 
6,632
2/8/2027
5,938
2/8/2026
2/8/2034
 
7,692
2/9/2026
5,938
2/8/2025
2/8/2034
5,525
0
2/3/2025
7,177
2/9/2026
2/9/2033
 
 
 
7,177
2/9/2025
2/9/2033
 
 
 
6,421
2/3/2025
2/3/2032
 
 
 
Elizabeth F. Whited
President
8,637
2/8/2027
2/8/2034
 
9,646
2/8/2027
8,637
2/8/2026
2/8/2034
 
5,178
2/9/2026
8,637
2/8/2025
2/8/2034
3,868
0
2/3/2025
4,831
2/9/2026
2/9/2033
 
 
 
4,831
2/9/2025
2/9/2033
 
 
 
4,495
2/3/2025
2/3/2032
 
 
 
Eric J. Gehringer
EVP Operations
5,398
2/8/2027
2/8/2034
 
6,029
2/8/2027
5,398
2/8/2026
2/8/2034
 
6,657
2/9/2026
5,398
2/8/2025
2/8/2034
3,316
0
2/3/2025
6,211
2/9/2026
2/9/2033
 
 
 
6,211
2/9/2025
2/9/2033
 
 
 
3,853
2/3/2025
2/3/2032
 
 
 
Kenny G. Rocker
EVP Marketing & Sales
4,319
2/8/2027
2/8/2034
 
4,823
2/8/2027
4,319
2/8/2026
2/8/2034
 
4,438
2/9/2026
4,319
2/8/2025
2/8/2034
3,316
0
2/3/2025
4,141
2/9/2026
2/9/2033
 
 
 
4,141
2/9/2025
2/9/2033
 
 
 
3,853
2/3/2025
2/3/2032
 
 
 
(i)
Reflects a stock option grant that vests one-third of the total each year for three years from the date of grant.
(ii)
Reflects performance stock units granted on February 3, 2022, that were earned, but not yet vested and settled as of December 31, 2024.
(iii)
Reflects the target amount that may be earned for the performance stock units granted on February 9, 2023, and the target amount that may be earned for the performance stock units granted on February 8, 2024. These performance stock units are each subject to a three-year performance period ending December 31, 2025, and December 31, 2026, respectively.
(b)
Reflects the closing price per share of the common stock on the last business day of the fiscal year multiplied by the number of shares. The closing price per share was $228.04 on December 31, 2024.
66

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Compensation
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal Year 2024
The following table shows a summary of the stock options exercised by the NEOs and stock awards that vested during the year.
 
OPTION AWARDS
STOCK AWARDS
NAME AND PRINCIPAL
POSITION
NUMBER OF
SHARES ACQUIRED
ON EXERCISE
VALUE
REALIZED UPON
EXERCISE
(a)
NUMBER OF
SHARES ACQUIRED
ON VESTING
VALUE
REALIZED UPON
VESTING
(a)
V. James Vena
Chief Executive Officer
0
$0
0
$0
Jennifer L. Hamann
EVP & Chief Financial Officer
4,796
717,530
7,396
1,840,273
Elizabeth F. Whited
President
7,500
649,575
5,547
1,380,205
Eric J. Gehringer
EVP Operations
0
0
3,698
920,136
Kenny G. Rocker
EVP Marketing & Sales
0
0
5,177
1,288,141
(a)
Value Realized Upon Exercise is calculated based upon the difference between the market price of the Company’s common stock on the exercise date and the exercise price of the options. Value Realized Upon Vesting is calculated based upon the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the vesting times the number of shares vested.
Pension Benefits at 2024 Fiscal Year-End
The table below sets forth the estimated present value of accumulated benefits payable under the Company’s defined benefit pension plans to the NEOs payable at the normal retirement age of 65 based on service and annual earnings (base salary and bonus, as described below) considered by the plans for the period through December 31, 2024. The present value was calculated as of December 31, 2024, based on the benefit at the normal retirement age of 65 paid in the form of a single life annuity. The present value factors used to determine the reported amounts are based on the sex distinct, white collar, Mercer Industry Longevity Experience Study Retiree Table for the Auto, Industrial Goods and Transportation industry group projected using Scale MP-2023 as of December 31, 2024, and the discount rate as disclosed in Note 5 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024. For purposes of reporting the change in pension value in the Summary Compensation Table, present value factors for the year ended December 31, 2023, were based on the sex distinct, white collar, Mercer Industry Longevity Experience Study Retiree Table for the Auto, Industrial Goods and Transportation industry group projected using Scale MP-2023 as of December 31, 2023, and the discount rate as disclosed in Note 5 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.
For both mortality tables, no pre-retirement decrements (i.e., death, disability) were assumed.
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION
PLAN NAME
NUMBER
OF YEARS
CREDITED
SERVICE
PRESENT
VALUE OF
ACCUMULATED
BENEFIT (a)
PAYMENTS
DURING LAST
FISCAL YEAR
V. James Vena (b)
Chief Executive Officer
Jennifer L. Hamann
EVP & Chief Financial Officer
Basic Plan
33.0000
$1,282,707
$0
Supplemental Plan
33.0000
3,779,402
0
Elizabeth F. Whited
President
Basic Plan
37.0833
1,442,133
0
Supplemental Plan
37.0833
4,736,026
0
Eric J. Gehringer
EVP Operations
Basic Plan
19.0000
381,722
0
Supplemental Plan
19.0000
926,486
0
Kenny G. Rocker
EVP Marketing & Sales
Basic Plan
30.4167
863,680
0
Supplemental Plan
30.4167
2,201,322
0
(a)
Present values for Ms. Hamann and Ms. Whited are based on the single life annuity payable at age 65 and include the present values of the joint life benefit (amount payable to the surviving spouse upon participant’s death). As of December 31, 2024, Mr. Gehringer and Mr. Rocker were not eligible for the surviving spouse benefit. We do not have a lump-sum payment option under our plans.
(b)
Mr. Vena was elected after January 1, 2018, and like other employees hired after this date, receives a comprehensive thrift plan benefit instead of participation in the Company’s combined thrift plan and pension plan offering that was available to employees hired prior to January 1, 2018.
Pensions for our NEOs are provided through the Pension Plan for Salaried Employees of Union Pacific Corporation and Affiliates (Basic Plan) and the Supplemental Pension Plan for Officers and Managers of Union Pacific Corporation and Affiliates (Supplemental Plan). The pension benefit formula for both the Basic Plan and the Supplemental Plan is (i) 1.667% of final average compensation times credited service (up to 30 years), plus (ii) 1% of final average compensation times credited service above 30 years (not to exceed 40 years) minus (iii) 1.5% of Social Security or Railroad Retirement benefit times
67

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Compensation
credited service (not to exceed 40 years). The amount of the annual pension benefit from both Plans is based upon final average compensation for the 36 consecutive months of highest regular compensation (base salary and up to three annual bonus plan awards within the 36-month period) within the 120-month period immediately preceding retirement. Credited service includes the years and months of service as a non-agreement employee and may include certain periods of agreement service or service with an acquired company. Both the Basic Plan and the Supplemental Plan were amended effective January 1, 2018 to provide that an employee hired or rehired on or after January 1, 2018, or who otherwise was not accruing a benefit under the Basic Plan on December 31, 2017, is not eligible to participate in the Basic Plan or the Supplemental Plan.
The Supplemental Plan is an unfunded non-contributory plan that, unlike the Basic Plan, provides for the grant of additional years of service and deemed age, for the inclusion of compensation in excess of IRS prescribed limits ($345,000 for 2024) and deferred annual bonuses in the calculation of final average compensation and for any benefit in excess of limitations provided for under Section 415(b) of the Code (for 2024, the lesser of 100% of the executive’s average compensation for his or her highest three years of service or $275,000). The Committee may grant additional years of service and deemed age credit to any participant as it determines appropriate.
Under both the Basic Plan and the Supplemental Plan, an executive’s age and vesting service upon termination of employment with the Company determines whether the executive is eligible for a normal retirement, early retirement, postponed retirement, or a vested benefit. Vesting service generally includes all service while an employee is with the Company, whether or not the employment counts as credited service. Normal retirement is offered to employees who end their employment at age 65 and benefits are not reduced. Postponed retirement is when an employee continues employment past age 65 and benefits are not reduced. Early retirement is offered to employees who end their employment between ages 55 and 65 and have at least ten years of vesting service. The benefit is reduced if payments begin before age 65, to reflect the expectation that benefits will be paid over a longer period of time. A vested benefit is offered to employees who end their employment before age 65 with at least five years of vesting service but do not satisfy the requirements for early retirement. This benefit is available as early as age 55. The benefit is reduced if payments begin before age 65. However, those reductions will be greater than those applied if the employee was eligible for early retirement. As of December 31, 2024, Ms. Hamann and Ms. Whited were eligible for early retirement under both Plans. Mr. Rocker and Mr. Gehringer were eligible to receive a vested benefit.
Benefits from both Plans are normally paid as a single life annuity providing monthly benefits for the employee’s life. The employee may waive the single life annuity and elect to receive the benefit in a different optional form. With respect to the Supplemental Plan benefit, this election must occur at least six months before, and no later than, the calendar year immediately preceding the benefit start date. Subject to eligibility conditions, the available optional forms of benefit include: 25%, 50%, 75%, or 100% Joint and Survivor Annuity; 10-Year Certain and Continuous; or, for the Basic Plan benefit only, a Level Income option. All optional forms of benefit are actuarially equal in value to the single life annuity. The Plans do not offer a lump-sum payment as an optional form. No NEO received any payments under either Plan during 2024.
68

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Compensation
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation at 2024 Fiscal Year-End
The Company has two non-qualified deferred compensation plans: the Supplemental Thrift Plan, which permits an executive to defer amounts from base salary; and the Deferred Compensation Plan, which permits deferral of bonuses awarded under the Executive Incentive Plan and deferral of stock unit awards made under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2021 Stock Incentive Plan (collectively, the Stock Incentive Plans). Amounts deferred under each of these arrangements represents unfunded, unsecured obligations of the Company. The table below shows NEO and Company allocations under these arrangements, earnings accrued on all amounts that the NEOs have deferred under the plans and the balances under each plan as of December 31, 2024. Executive incentive bonus deferrals and stock unit award deferrals under the Deferred Compensation Plan are shown separately.
NAME AND PRINCIPAL
POSITION
PLAN NAME
EXECUTIVE
CONTRIBUTIONS
IN LAST FISCAL
YEAR
(a)
COMPANY
CONTRIBUTIONS
IN LAST FISCAL
YEAR
(b)
AGGREGATE
EARNINGS/
(LOSS) IN
LAST FISCAL
YEAR
(c)
AGGREGATE
WITHDRAWALS/
DISTRIBUTIONS
AGGREGATE
BALANCE AT
LAST FISCAL
YEAR END
(d) (e)
V. James Vena
Chief Executive Officer
Supplemental Thrift
$59,300
$88,950
($4,319)
$0
$143,931
Executive Incentive Deferral
0
0
0
0
0
Deferral of Stock Unit Awards
0
0
0
0
0
Jennifer L. Hamann EVP & Chief Financial Officer
Supplemental Thrift
50,500
10,100
12,918
0
281,005
Executive Incentive Deferral
0
0
3,368
0
185,892
Deferral of Stock Unit Awards
0
0
0
0
0
Elizabeth F. Whited President
Supplemental Thrift
99,333
14,900
23,465
0
410,044
Executive Incentive Deferral
0
0
34,347
0
425,169
Deferral of Stock Unit Awards
0
0
(200,716)
0
3,365,172
Eric J. Gehringer
EVP Operations
Supplemental Thrift
18,300
9,150
7,644
0
91,729
Executive Incentive Deferral
0
0
0
0
0
Deferral of Stock Unit Awards
920,136
0
(57,788)
0
862,348
Kenny G. Rocker
EVP Marketing & Sales
Supplemental Thrift
0
0
8,155
0
90,162
Executive Incentive Deferral
0
0
0
0
0
Deferral of Stock Unit Awards
0
0
(6,152)
0
79,811
(a)
Executive Contributions in the Last Fiscal Year under the Supplemental Thrift Plan are amounts that are also reported in the Salary column in the Summary Compensation Table.
(b)
Company Contributions in the Last Fiscal Year were reported as All Other Compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for 2024.
(c)
Aggregate Earnings on deferred stock unit awards represent appreciation or loss in the value of Company common stock and dividend equivalents, which are deemed to be reinvested in Company common stock.
(d)
Amounts reported in Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End that were reported in the Salary column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2023 and 2022, but deferred under the Supplemental Thrift Plan are, Ms. Hamann, $45,500 and $43,000; Ms. Whited, $62,871 and $43,600; Mr. Gehringer, $14,950 and $9,750; and Mr. Rocker, $15,300 and $14,925, respectively. Amounts reported in Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End that were reported in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2023 and 2022, representing Company contributions to the Supplemental Thrift Plan are, for Ms. Hamann, $9,100 and $8,600; Ms. Whited; $9,431 and $6,540; Mr. Gehringer; $7,475 and $4,875; and Mr. Rocker, $7,475 and $4,875, respectively.
(e)
The Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End for deferred stock unit awards represents 14,756 shares of Company common stock for Ms. Whited, 3,781 shares of Company common stock for Mr. Gehringer, and 350 shares of Company common stock for Mr. Rocker.
Deferral Amounts
Supplemental Thrift Plan. The Supplemental Thrift Plan is available to executives who otherwise participate in the Company’s Thrift Plan, which is a defined contribution plan intended to be a plan qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code. The Qualified Thrift Plan permits executives to contribute, on a pre-tax, Roth and/or after-tax basis from 1% to 75% (combined) of base salary through payroll deductions. An executive is not permitted to defer amounts from base salary under the terms of the Supplemental Thrift Plan until the earlier of the following: (i) the amount of base salary paid to the executive during the year equals the IRS prescribed limit ($345,000 for 2024); or (ii) the contributions to the Qualified Thrift Plan made by or on behalf of the executive (including matching and other employer contributions) equal the IRS prescribed annual addition limit under Section 415(c) of the Code ($69,000 in 2024). An executive who has elected to participate in the Supplemental Thrift Plan before the start of the calendar year in which one of these limits is reached will have payroll deductions on a pre-tax basis continued from his/her base pay for the remainder of the calendar year at a percentage that may differ from the percentage rate(s) the executive elected under the Qualified Thrift Plan as of the first day of the
69

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Compensation
calendar year. Under the Supplemental Thrift Plan, the executive may defer from 1% to 75% of base salary. Currently and unless the changes described in the following paragraph apply to the executive, the Company credits a matching amount equal to 50 cents of each dollar an executive defers to the Supplemental Thrift Plan for a pay period up to 6% of the executive’s base pay for the pay period.
The Supplemental Thrift Plan was amended effective January 1, 2018, as part of the changes made to the Company’s overall retirement plan design strategy, including closing the Company’s pension plan for certain employees (see pages 67 and 71). The Supplemental Thrift Plan changes will apply to an executive hired or rehired by the Company on or after January 1, 2018, or who was not accruing a benefit under the Pension Plan for Salaried Employees of Union Pacific Corporation and Affiliates on December 31, 2017 (a “Post-2017 Executive”). The same general rules described above regarding executive deferrals continue to apply to Post-2017 Executives, except that the matching amount the Company credits under the Supplemental Thrift Plan is $1 for every dollar a Post-2017 Executive defers to the Supplemental Thrift Plan for a pay period up to 6% of the Post-2017 Executive’s base salary for the pay period. Furthermore, a Non-Elective Contribution feature (“NEC”) was added to both the Qualified Thrift Plan and Supplemental Thrift Plan. The NEC amount equals 3% of the Post-2017 Executive’s base salary for the calendar year. The NEC amount credited on behalf of a Post-2017 Executive under the Supplemental Thrift Plan for a calendar year is the difference between the NEC calculated under the terms of the Qualified Thrift Plan (but determined without regard to the IRS limits described in the paragraph above) and the amount of the NEC actually contributed to the Qualified Thrift Plan on behalf of the Post-2017 Executive after taking into account those limits. The NEC amount contributed to the Qualified Thrift Plan or credited to the Supplemental Thrift Plan occurs in January of the year immediately following the year to which the NEC is attributable.
Deferred Compensation Plan. The Deferred Compensation Plan allows for the deferral of all or a portion of a bonus awarded under the Executive Incentive Plan and for the deferral of payment of stock units, both retention and performance based, awarded under the Stock Incentive Plan. An executive must elect by June 30th of the calendar year for which the bonus amount is awarded whether to defer any or all of his or her bonus award for such year. For retention stock units, an executive’s election to defer payment of a vested award must be made prior to the beginning of the calendar year for which the retention stock unit award is granted to the executive. For performance stock units, an executive must elect by June 30th of the first year of the three-year performance period whether to defer the payment of the entire award of vested and earned performance stock units.
Rate of Return Provisions
Notional accounts in the Supplemental Thrift Plan are deemed to be invested in one or more of the investment options offered in the Qualified Thrift Plan, as selected by the participating executive. Notional accounts in the Deferred Compensation Plan for bonus amounts deferred currently can be invested in the same investment options, along with the Company’s Fixed Rate Fund that bears interest equal to 120% of the Applicable Federal Long-Term Annual rate for January of the applicable year. The Vanguard Group administers all notional accounts. Executives can generally transfer amounts between investment funds each business day. Earnings reflect the increase or decrease in the value of those investment funds and any interest or dividends earned by those funds, to the same extent as if amounts were actually invested in those investment funds.
Notional accounts in the Deferred Compensation Plan for stock units deferred are invested in notional shares of the Company’s common stock. The value of each stock unit deferred is equivalent to that of one share of Company common stock. Amounts equivalent to the dividends paid on Company common stock are added to an executive’s notional account when actual dividends are paid and are credited as reinvested in additional notional shares. These amounts are tracked through notional accounts maintained by the Company.
Payment Elections, Withdrawals and Distributions
The Company adopted amended and restated plans effective as of January 1, 2009, in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. Non-qualified deferred compensation amounts not subject to Section 409A of the Code, (i.e., amounts credited to an executive’s notional account as of December 31, 2004, and earnings thereon), are available for distribution or withdrawal in accordance with the terms of the Grandfathered Component of the Supplemental Thrift Plan or the Grandfathered Component of the Deferred Compensation Plan, as applicable. Non-qualified deferred compensation amounts subject to Section 409A of the Code, (i.e., amounts credited to an executive’s notional account on and after January 1, 2005, and earnings thereon), are available for distribution in accordance with the terms of the Non-Grandfathered Component of the Supplemental Thrift Plan or Non-Grandfathered Component of the Deferred Compensation Plan, as applicable.
409A Non-Grandfathered Components-Supplemental Thrift and Deferred Compensation Plans
NEOs made payment elections with respect to their then-existing notional account balances under the Non-Grandfathered Component of both the Supplemental Thrift Plan and the Deferred Compensation Plan prior to the end of 2008. Generally speaking, NEOs who first participated in the Non-Grandfathered Component of the Supplemental Thrift Plan in 2009 or later may make a payment election under the Non-Grandfathered Component of the Supplemental Thrift Plan in the calendar year prior to the calendar year his or her initial deferral election becomes effective. A payment election made under the
70

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Compensation
Non-Grandfathered Component of the Supplemental Thrift Plan also will apply with respect to compensation an executive elects to defer in the future under the Non-Grandfathered Component of the Supplemental Thrift Plan. Executives may make a separate payment election with respect to each bonus, retention stock unit or performance stock unit award deferred under the Non-Grandfathered Component of the Deferred Compensation Plan at the same time the deferral election is made. Generally, the same payment option must be elected for all awards of the same type (i.e., bonus or stock units) deferred to separation from service under the Non-Grandfathered Deferred Compensation Plan.
The Non-Grandfathered Component of both the Supplemental Thrift Plan and Deferred Compensation Plan provide the following payment options: (i) a single sum distribution at separation from service or in January of the next year following separation from service, (ii) annual installments over a period not exceeding 15 years, with the initial installment being paid as soon as administratively practicable following the executive’s separation from service or in January of the year next following such separation from service, or (iii) a single sum distribution in January of a specified year that is not earlier than 2 years and not later than 15 years following the executive’s separation from service. However, if the executive first participates in the Non-Grandfathered Component of the Supplemental Thrift Plan after December 31, 2017, the single sum or installment payments described above cannot be made or commence before the January of the year following the year in which the executive separates from service. The Non-Grandfathered Component of the Deferred Compensation Plan also permits an executive to elect to receive payment at the earlier of: (i) July of a year specified by the executive, or (ii) separation from service. In no case, however, will an amount payable on account of a NEO’s separation from service be paid from either Non-Grandfathered Component before the date that is six months after such executive’s separation from service.
Generally speaking, under both plans, an executive who does not make a timely election will receive the Non-Grandfathered Component of his or her notional account at the time of his or her separation from service in a single sum payment, subject to the six-month delay as described in the last sentence of the immediately preceding paragraph. However, an executive who first participates in the Non-Grandfathered Component of the Supplemental Thrift Plan after December 31, 2017, and who does not make a timely election will receive his or her notional account in January of the year following the executive’s separation from service, subject to the six-month delay rule. In the event an executive dies before receiving payment of his or her entire notional account balance, the unpaid balance is paid in a single sum to the executive’s beneficiary.
Generally, no withdrawals are permitted from the notional accounts maintained in connection with the Non-Grandfathered Components of either the Supplemental Thrift Plan or the Deferred Compensation Plan prior to the executive’s separation from service.
Under the terms applicable to the Non-Grandfathered Components of the Deferred Compensation Plan and the Supplemental Thrift Plan, an executive may modify his or her payment election if such modification election is made prior to the executive’s separation from service and at least 12 months prior to the date payments would have commenced in accordance with the prior election. In addition, the modification must have the effect of postponing the payment commencement date by at least five years.
409A Grandfathered Components—Supplemental Thrift and Deferred Compensation Plans
An executive can take a withdrawal in cash from the Grandfathered Component of his or her notional account under the Supplemental Thrift Plan or the Deferred Compensation Plan prior to separation from service, provided that 10% of the amount withdrawn will be irrevocably forfeited by the executive.
Following an executive’s separation from service, the general rule is that an executive’s notional account under the Grandfathered Component of each plan is distributed in a single sum cash payment as soon as administratively practicable. However, an executive can elect at least six months prior to his or her separation from service and in the calendar year preceding such separation from service that such component be paid under one of the following payment options: (i) a single sum cash payment at separation from service or in January of the year next following his or her separation from service, (ii) annual installments over a period not exceeding 15 years, with the initial installment being paid as soon as administratively practicable following the executive’s separation from service or in January of the year next following such separation from service, or (iii) a single sum cash payment in January of a specified year that is not later than 15 years following the executive’s separation from service. The Grandfathered Component of the Deferred Compensation Plan also permits an executive to elect to receive payment at the earlier of: (i) July of a year specified by the executive, or (ii) separation from service. This election may be changed at least six months prior to the scheduled payment date and in the calendar year preceding such date. With respect to the Grandfathered Component of the Supplemental Thrift Plan, an executive’s payment election applies to the executive’s entire notional account balance. With respect to the Grandfathered Component of the Deferred Compensation Plan, an executive may make a separate payment election for each bonus award under the Executive Incentive Plan or stock unit award under the Stock Incentive Plan; provided that the executive must elect the same payment option for all such awards of the same type (i.e., bonus or stock units) deferred to separation from service.
71

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Compensation
Potential Payments Upon Separation from Service, Change-In-Control or Death or Disability
The information below describes certain compensation that would have become payable by the Company under existing plans assuming a separation from service or change-in-control and separation from service occurred on December 31, 2024 (based upon the Company’s closing stock price on December 31, 2024, of $228.04), given the NEOs’ current compensation and service levels as of such date. The benefits discussed below are in addition to those generally available to all salaried employees, such as distributions under the qualified Pension Plan for Salaried Employees, health care benefits and disability benefits. In addition, these benefits do not take into account any arrangements that do not currently exist but may be offered by the Company in connection with an actual separation from service or a change-in-control or other factors that may vary from time to time. Due to the number of different factors that affect the nature and amount of any benefits provided in connection with these events, actual amounts payable to any of the NEOs should a separation from service or change-in-control occur during the year will likely differ, perhaps significantly, from the amounts reported below. Factors that could affect such amounts include the timing during the year of the triggering event, the Company’s stock price, the target amounts payable under annual and long-term incentive arrangements that are in place at the time of the event, and the executive’s age.
Separation from Service
In the event of the separation from service of any of the NEOs on December 31, 2024, for any reason, the executive would be entitled to the executive’s accumulated retirement benefits under the Basic and Supplemental Plans in the payment forms set forth in the Pension Benefits at 2024 Fiscal Year-End Table on page 67. Under both Plans, the executive must be at least age 55 and have 5 years of service (including deemed service under the Supplemental Plan) with the Company, or at least age 65 regardless of years of service, for benefits to be payable immediately. Assuming a termination date of December 31, 2024, Ms. Hamann and Ms. Whited were eligible to begin Basic Plan benefits immediately at January 1, 2025 and are required to begin Supplemental Plan benefits as of that date, although the first six months’ benefit payments are delayed and would be paid (without interest) on July 1, 2025. The monthly amount payable as a single life annuity under the Supplemental Plan for Ms. Hamann was $27,180 and for Ms. Whited was $33,770. Assuming a termination date of December 31, 2024, Mr. Gehringer would be eligible to begin his benefit on April 1, 2034. The monthly amount payable as a single life annuity under the Supplemental Plan for Mr. Gehringer would be $9,229. Assuming a termination date of December 31, 2024, Mr. Rocker would be eligible to begin his benefit on December 1, 2026. The monthly amount payable as a single life annuity under the Supplemental Plan for Mr. Rocker would be $14,472.
Each of the NEOs would also be entitled to the amount shown in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation at 2024 Fiscal Year-End Table on page 69. Notional returns continue to be credited and debited under these plans through the actual payment date, so amounts may differ at the time of an actual separation from service or change-in-control.
For any unvested equity awards, the Compensation and Talent Committee may, but is not required to, waive the related restriction period and/or employment requirements. As described in the Narrative Disclosure to the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table on page 63, the 2024 equity awards provided for satisfaction of the continued employment requirement if an executive attains age 62 with 10 years of vesting service and remains employed until September 30th in the year of grant. Vesting service is determined by applying the Basic Plan's rules for determining vesting service, regardless of whether the executive was ever a participant in the Basic Plan. In addition, Mr. Vena’s equity awards will continue to vest in full, and his vested options will remain exercisable for five years from the date of retirement, if he has served at least two years from the date he commenced service as CEO, gives at least 180 days’ notice of his retirement and assists in the transition of his role to his successor.
Change-in-Control
The Continuity Plan provides severance benefits to the NEOs in the event (i) a change-in-control occurs and (ii) the NEO incurs a severance within the two-year period following such change-in-control. Severance means a separation from service (as such term is defined in Section 409A of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder): (i) by the Company other than for cause or pursuant to mandatory retirement policies in existence prior to the change-in-control, or (ii) by the NEO for good reason on or after the change-in-control.
Under the Continuity Plan, a change-in-control means any of the following:
any “person,” as defined in the Exchange Act, becomes the “beneficial owner,” as defined in the Exchange Act, of 20% or more of our outstanding voting securities;
there is a change in 50% of the composition of the Board of Directors (such change must be due to new directors not recommended by the Board);
a merger, consolidation or reorganization that results in our shareholders holding 50% or less of the outstanding voting securities of the post-transaction entity; or
a liquidation, dissolution or sale of all or substantially all of our assets.
72

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Compensation
The Continuity Plan defines a severance “for cause” if it is for any of the following reasons: (i) the NEO has willfully and continually failed to substantially perform his or her duties, or (ii) the NEO has willfully engaged in conduct that is demonstrably injurious to the Company, monetarily or otherwise.
A severance of the NEO is for “good reason” if it is for any of the following reasons without the NEOs written consent: (i) the assignment to the NEO of duties that are materially inconsistent with the NEO’s duties immediately prior to the change-in-control or any material diminution in the nature or scope of the NEO’s responsibilities from those in effect immediately prior to the change-in-control; (ii) a reduction in the NEO’s base salary or annual bonus opportunity in effect immediately prior to the change-in-control; provided, however, that such reduction results in a material diminution in the total package of compensation and benefits provided to the NEO; (iii) a material reduction in the NEO’s pension, thrift, medical or long term disability benefits provided to the NEO immediately prior to the change-in-control; provided, however, that such reduction results in a material diminution in the total package of compensation and benefits provided to the NEO; or (iv) the failure by any successor, to all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company, to expressly assume and agree to perform under the Continuity Plan.
In the event of a qualifying severance following a change-in-control, each of the NEOs receives a lump-sum severance payment equal to the sum of (i) his or her annual base salary in effect at the time of his or her severance and (ii) the average annual bonus earned under the Executive Incentive Plan in the most recent three calendar years; multiplied by 3 for Mr. Vena and by 2 for Ms. Hamann, Ms. Whited, Mr. Gehringer, and Mr. Rocker.
The Continuity Plan provides in the event of a qualifying severance following a change-in-control that all unvested stock options granted to each NEO vest and become exercisable for a period of three years (or five years if the NEO is retirement eligible) from the NEO’s separation from service. In no event will the period exceed the remaining term of the option. For outstanding performance stock units, the NEO will be entitled to receive shares equal to the number of performance stock units at the level of performance criteria actually achieved through the end of each year prior to the date of the change-in-control and through the end of the most recent fiscal quarter ending prior to the date of the change-in-control.
Other benefits under the Continuity Plan include the continuation of health coverage and dental coverage for three years following a NEO’s severance (or, if sooner, until the NEO attains the age of 52, at which time the NEO is eligible to receive benefits under the Company’s retiree medical benefit plans, if the NEO’s original hire date is before January 1, 2004); provided, however, that (i) the NEO will pay the fair market value of such coverage (active or retiree, as applicable) as determined under Section 61 of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder, and (ii) benefit amounts received by the NEO will be reduced by any benefits received by the NEO from a subsequent employer.
The Continuity Plan does not provide for any tax gross-ups. As a result, none of the Company’s executives, including the NEOs, are eligible to receive any excise tax gross-up on any severance payment received under the Continuity Plan.
The table below sets forth the estimated value of the severance payments, welfare benefits, and accelerated equity awards for each NEO, assuming a change-in-control had occurred as of December 31, 2024, and the NEO’s employment had immediately terminated without cause or for good reason as of that date. Amounts are reported without any reduction for possible delay in the commencement or timing of payments. If the payments due to a change-in-control were to result in an excise tax being due, the aggregate payments would be reduced to the largest amount which could be paid without triggering an excise tax. The amounts reported in the table below do not reflect the application of any reduction in benefits.
NAME AND PRINCIPAL
POSITION
CASH
SEVERANCE
PAYMENT
(a)
ACCELERATED
VESTING OF
STOCK
OPTIONS
(b)
ACCELERATED
VESTING OF
PERFORMANCE
STOCK
UNITS
(c)
OTHER
(d)
PRE-TAX TOTAL
V. James Vena
Chief Executive Officer
$8,268,750
$0
$6,598,793
$0
$14,867,543
Jennifer L. Hamann
EVP & Chief Financial Officer
2,289,583
362,151
4,526,366
34,215
7,212,315
Elizabeth F. Whited
President
2,748,528
243,772
4,262,524
34,215
7,289,039
Eric J. Gehringer
EVP Operations
2,240,850
313,407
3,649,096
57,600
6,260,953
Kenny G. Rocker
EVP Marketing & Sales
2,091,300
208,955
2,868,059
57,600
5,225,914
(a)
This amount is based on 2024 salary and three-year average bonus multiplied by the Continuity Plan severance multiple.
(b)
This amount is based upon the difference between the exercise price of the options and the Company’s closing stock price on December 31, 2024, of $228.04.
(c)
This amount is based on the Company’s closing stock price on December 31, 2024, of $228.04 and assumes a payout of performance stock units (PSUs) at 90% for PSUs granted February 3, 2022, for the performance period ended December 31, 2024; at target for PSUs granted February 9, 2023 and February 8, 2024.
(d)
For a termination as of December 31, 2024, this amount includes the cost of medical premiums paid by the Company for three years and assumes no benefit reduction from a subsequent employer.
73

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Compensation
Death or Disability
In the event a NEO ceases to be an employee due to death or disability under the Company’s long-term disability plan, the NEO’s unvested stock options will fully vest and vested options will remain outstanding until the earlier of (a) five years or (b) their original expiration date. In the event a NEO, other than Mr. Vena, ceases to be an employee by way of death or disability under the Company’s long-term disability plan, a pro-rata portion of the NEO’s PSUs will remain outstanding and be settled to the extent earned at the end of the three-year performance period. The pro-rata portion is determined based on the number of years during the three-year performance period the NEO remains continuously employed prior to the date of death or disability. The NEO must remain continuously employed through September 30th of the performance year in order to be credited with a year of service for such year. The same treatment applies to Mr. Vena’s PSUs for termination due to death or disability, except there would be no proration, and the PSUs would vest in full, with PSUs earned based on actual performance over the full performance period, In addition, in the event of Mr. Vena’s termination without cause, the treatment of his options and PSUs would be the same as in the event of his death or disability.
Set forth below is the estimated value of the accelerated vesting of performance stock units and stock options for each NEO as of December 31, 2024.
NAME
ACCELERATED VESTING
OF PERFORMANCE STOCK
UNITS
(a)
ACCELERATED VESTING
OF STOCK
OPTIONS
(b)
V. James Vena
Chief Executive Officer
$6,598,793
$0
Jennifer L. Hamann
EVP & Chief Financial Officer
2,933,507
362,151
Elizabeth F. Whited
President
2,402,401
243,772
Eric J. Gehringer
EVP Operations
2,226,583
313,407
Kenny G. Rocker
EVP Marketing & Sales
1,797,639
208,955
(a)
This amount is based on the Company’s closing stock price on December 31, 2024, of $228.04 and assumes a payout of performance stock units (PSUs) at 90% for PSUs granted February 3, 2022, for the performance period ended December 31, 2024; at target for PSUs granted February 9, 2023 and February 8, 2024.
(b)
Amounts are calculated based on the number of unvested option shares multiplied by the difference in the Company’s closing stock price on December 31, 2024, of $228.04 and the exercise price on the grant date. The exercise price of the stock options granted on February 3, 2022 is $244.35; the exercise price of the stock options granted on February 9, 2023 is $202.81; the exercise price of the stock options granted on February 8, 2024 is $248.82.
74

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pay Ratio Disclosure
The median 2024 annual total compensation of all our employees as of December 31, 2024 was $134,862.* The 2024 annualized compensation of V. James Vena, our Chief Executive Officer (CEO), was $17,644,763. The resulting CEO pay ratio of these amounts was 131:1. The median employee is a signal foreman whose compensation is subject to a national collective bargaining agreement.
In determining the median employee, we utilized reasonable estimates. We identified the median employee by examining the 2024 W-2 box 1 income (Taxable Income) for all individuals on December 31, 2024, other than our CEO. We included all employees, whether employed on a full-time, part-time or seasonal basis except that we excluded 27 of our non-U.S. employees, under the SEC’s de minimis exemption, since these employees represent less than 0.1% of our approximately 34,100 employees. Taxable Income for non-seasonal employees who were not employed for the full-year was annualized. The employees were then ranked based on Taxable Income and the median employee selected.
After identifying the median employee based on Taxable Income, we calculated annual total compensation for such employee using the same methodology we use for our Named Executive Officers as set forth in the 2024 Summary Compensation Table on page 60.
The SEC’s rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices. As a result, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.
*
The median annual compensation amount reported in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, was $103,190 and is calculated differently than the $134,862 amount noted above. The $134,862 includes amounts for pre-tax medical premiums, 401(k)/thrift plan contributions and employer cost of health coverage.
75

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pay versus Performance Disclosure
The following table provides a summary of compensation actually paid, as defined by the SEC (CAP), to the principal executive officer (PEO), the average CAP for the other non-PEO named executive officers (Other NEOs), total shareholder return (TSR), net income and the Company-selected financial measure (CSM) of operating income for 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021 and 2020.
Year
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
PEO
V. James Vena
(a)
Compensation
Actually Paid
to PEO
V. James Vena
(a)
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
PEO
Lance M. Fritz
(a)
Compensation
Actually Paid
to PEO
Lance M. Fritz
(a)
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO
NEOs
(a)
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Non-PEO
NEOs
(a)
Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based On:
Net
Income
(c)
In Millions
CSM:
Operating
Income
(c)
In Millions
Company
TSR
Peer
Group
TSR
(b)
2024
$17,644,763
$12,782,098
$4,879,690
$3,865,271
$141
$156
$6,747
$9,713
2023
2,017,348
2,017,348
15,552,576
13,105,795
3,639,648
3,680,741
148
154
6,379
9,082
2022
14,326,072
5,546,491
2,690,886
2,533,173
122
128
6,998
9,917
2021
14,523,819
23,246,960
3,188,100
4,326,065
145
155
6,523
9,338
2020
16,632,099
14,075,218
4,297,722
5,491,165
118
117
5,349
7,834
(a)
Mr. Fritz, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer, served as our principal executive officer (PEO) for 2020, 2021, and 2022, and until August 14, 2023, when Mr. Vena became the CEO. The Other NEOs represent the following individuals for each of the years shown: Ms. Hamann, Ms. Whited, Mr. Rocker, and Mr. Gehringer for 2024, 2023, 2022, and 2021; and Mr. Vena (in his capacity as our then Chief Operating Officer), Ms. Hamann, Ms. Whited and Mr. Rocker for 2020.
(b)
The peer group index is the Dow Jones Transportation Index, which is included in Item 5 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.
(c)
Net income and operating income for 2022 reflect a $92 million one-time charge for the labor agreements reached with our labor unions. Net income and operating income for 2020 reflect a $278 million non-cash impairment charge related to our Brazos yard investment.
(d)
CAP is defined by the SEC to include not only actual take-home pay for the reported year, but also (i) the year-end value of equity awards granted during the reported year, and (ii) the change in the value of equity awards that were unvested at the end of the prior year, measured through the date such awards vested or were forfeited, or through the end of the reported fiscal year. To calculate CAP, the following amounts were deducted from and added to the applicable executives’ “total compensation” as reported in the Summary Compensation Table (SCT). No adjustments were made to Mr. Vena’s 2023 total compensation for purposes of calculating his 2023 CAP.
PEO V. James Vena SCT Total to CAP Reconciliation:
Year
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for PEO
Reported
Value of
Equity Awards
(i)
Equity Award
Adjustments
(ii)
Reported
Change in
the
Actuarial
Present
Value of
Pension
Benefits
(iii)
Pension
Benefit
Adjustments
(iv)
Compensation
Actually
Paid to
PEO
2024
$17,644,763
($12,000,196)
$7,137,531
$12,782,098
2023
2,017,348
2,017,348
PEO Lance M. Fritz SCT Total to CAP Reconciliation:
Year
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for PEO
Reported
Value of
Equity Awards
(i)
Equity Award
Adjustments
(ii)
Reported
Change in
the
Actuarial
Present
Value of
Pension
Benefits
(iii)
Pension
Benefit
Adjustments
(iv)
Compensation
Actually
Paid
to PEO
2023
$15,552,576
($12,000,274)
$10,562,712
($1,500,939)
$491,720
$13,105,795
2022
14,326,072
(12,000,163)
2,504,547
716,035
5,546,491
2021
14,523,819
(10,500,166)
18,510,398
(47,311)
760,220
23,246,960
2020
16,632,099
(10,500,105)
10,583,878
(3,269,470)
628,816
14,075,218
76

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pay versus Performance Disclosure
Average Non-PEO NEOs SCT Total to CAP Reconciliation:
Year
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for Non-PEO
NEOs
Average
Reported
Value of
Equity Awards
(i)
Equity Award
Adjustments
(ii)
Average
Reported
Change in
the
Actuarial
Present
Value of
Pension
Benefits
(iii)
Pension
Benefit
Adjustments
(iv)
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Non-PEO
NEOs
2024
$4,879,690
($2,812,707)
$1,639,815
($7,237)
$165,710
$3,865,271
2023
3,639,648
(2,025,201)
2,413,150
(682,484)
335,628
3,680,741
2022
2,690,886
(1,812,770)
594,285
1,060,772
2,533,173
2021
3,188,100
(1,475,163)
2,409,395
(367,668)
571,401
4,326,065
2020
4,297,722
(2,087,623)
4,094,333
(1,064,470)
251,203
5,491,165
(i)
The amounts included in this column are the grant date fair value of equity awards as reported in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns in the SCT for each applicable year.
(ii)
The equity award adjustments for each applicable year reflect the year-over-year change in the fair value of equity awards as itemized in the tables below
PEO V. James Vena Equity Award Adjustments Reconciliation:
Year
Fair Value as of Year-End
of Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Fair Value as of Vest Date of
Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Increase (Decrease) from Prior
Year-End in Fair Value of
Awards That Vested During the
Year
Year-over-Year Increase
(Decrease) in Fair Value of
Unvested Awards Granted in
Prior Years
Total Equity Award
Adjustments
2024
$7,137,531
$7,137,531
2023
PEO Lance M. Fritz Equity Award Adjustments Reconciliation:
Year
Fair Value as of Year-End of
Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Fair Value as of Vest Date of
Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Increase (Decrease) from Prior
Year-End in Fair Value of
Awards That Vested During the
Year
Year-over-Year Increase
(Decrease) in Fair Value of
Unvested Awards Granted in
Prior Years
Awards Forfeited
During the Year
Total Equity Award
Adjustments
2023
$11,353,821
$350,903
$3,250,480
($4,392,492)
$10,562,712
2022
8,228,329
(1,183,911)
(4,539,871)
2,504,547
2021
12,578,359
(1,151,373)
7,083,412
18,510,398
2020
11,615,105
4,891
(1,036,118)
10,583,878
Average Non-PEO NEOs Equity Award Adjustments Reconciliation:
Year
Fair Value as of Year-End of
Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Fair Value as of Vest Date of
Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Increase (Decrease) from Prior
Year-End in Fair Value of
Awards That Vested During the
Year
Year-over-Year Increase
(Decrease) in Fair Value of
Unvested Awards Granted in
Prior Years
Total Equity Award
Adjustments
2024
$1,672,955
$12,414
($45,554)
$1,639,815
2023
1,916,131
44,065
452,954
2,413,150
2022
1,242,989
(116,387)
(532,317)
594,285
2021
1,767,115
(83,871)
726,151
2,409,395
2020
2,576,000
1,372,918
(1,750)
147,165
4,094,333
(iii)
The amounts included in this column are the change in the present actuarial value of the executives’ accumulated benefit under the Company’s pension plan as reported in “Change in Pension and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column of the SCT for each applicable year.
(iv)
The total pension benefit adjustments for each applicable year include the actuarially determined service cost for services rendered during the applicable year (the “service cost”).
Most Important Measures to Determine 2024 CAP
Below lists the most important financial metrics used to link 2024 CAP to Company performance. Operating income, operating ratio and return on invested capital are further described in our CD&A within the sections titled “2024 Annual Incentive Plan” and “Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation.”
Operating Income
Operating Ratio
Return on Invested Capital
77

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pay versus Performance Disclosure
TSR: Company versus Peer Group
The following chart presents the cumulative total shareholder return, assuming reinvestment of dividends, over the 5-year period for the Company (UNP) and the Dow Jones Transportation Index (DJ Trans). As the table demonstrates, the Company’s 5-year cumulative TSR is generally aligned with our peer group index.

CAP versus TSR
As shown in the chart below, the PEO’s CAP and Other NEOs’ Average CAP amounts are directionally aligned with the Company’s TSR. This is due primarily to the Company’s use of equity incentives, the value of which moves in line with our TSR, in addition to the Company’s financial performance. The Other NEOs’ Average CAP in 2020 also reflects the compensation of a more senior executive who ceased to serve as one of the Other NEOs in 2021. The Other NEO’s Average CAP increased in 2023 and 2024 due primarily to changes in the Company’s stock price and the election of Ms. Whited as the Company’s President. The PEO’s CAP in 2024 reflects Mr. Vena’s first full year of service as the CEO.


CAP versus Net Income
The Company’s net income increased in 2021, 2022 and 2024, and decreased in 2023, while the PEO and Other NEOs’ CAP has varied significantly each year. This is due in large part to the significant emphasis the Company places on equity incentives, the value of which are affected by our TSR. In addition, the Company does not use net income to determine compensation levels or incentive plan payouts.
78

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pay versus Performance Disclosure
CAP versus Operating Income – Company-Selected Measure (CSM)


Operating income and operating ratio (of which operating income is a component) are equally weighted financial measures used in our annual incentive plan, as described in our CD&A. In addition, performance stock units awarded to our NEOs are earned based one-third (1/3) on operating income growth (OIG). The Company’s operating income has steadily increased year-over-year, except for 2023, although its impact on the PEO’s and Other NEO’s CAP has been muted or offset by other performance measures and by changes in the Company’s stock price.
79

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned as of March 14, 2025 (except as otherwise noted), by (i) each person known to the Company to own more than 5% of the Company’s common stock, (ii) each Named Executive Officer (as defined in the CD&A section of this Proxy Statement under Executive Compensation), (iii) each director or director nominee and (iv) all current directors and executive officers (as designated in the Company’s 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K) as a group. The table also sets forth ownership information concerning stock units, the value of which is measured by the price of the common stock. Stock units do not confer voting rights and are not considered beneficially owned shares under SEC rules.
NAME
NUMBER OF
SHARES
BENEFICIALLY
OWNED (a)
STOCK
UNITS (b)
PERCENT OF
SHARES
OUTSTANDING
William J. DeLaney
17,500
5,676
*
David B. Dillon
4.050
12,326
*
Sheri H. Edison
0
2,435
*
Teresa M. Finley
1,380
2,322
*
Eric J. Gehringer
62,905
38,924
*
Jennifer L. Hamann
160,132
43,432
*
Deborah C. Hopkins
4,768
11,510
*
Jane H. Lute
4,143
10,078
*
Michael R. McCarthy
54,864
67,374
*
Kenny G. Rocker
89,711
29,610
*
Doyle R. Simons
0
1,617
*
John K. Tien, Jr.
0
811
*
V. James Vena
25,910
131,794
*
Elizabeth F. Whited
126,313
49,360
*
John P. Wiehoff
795
1,081
*
Christopher J. Williams
0
5,108
*
The Vanguard Group (c)
57,819,573
0
9.65%
BlackRock, Inc. (d)
42,030,360
0
7.01%
All current directors and executive officers as a group (19 people)
687,963
461,886
*
*
Indicates ownership of less than 1%
(a)
Includes the maximum number of shares of common stock that may be acquired within 60 days of March 14, 2025, upon the exercise of stock options as follows: Mr. Gehringer 50,250; Ms. Hamann 88,963; Mr. Rocker 65,557; Mr. Vena 25,010; and Ms. Whited 65,435; and all current directors and executive officers as a group 378,079. Also included in the number of shares owned by Mr. Gehringer, Ms. Hamann, Mr. Rocker, and Ms. Whited are 7,098, 5.525, 350, and 18,504 deferred stock units, respectively, representing deferred stock option exercise gains and vested retention stock units which they will acquire as shares of common stock at termination of employment or a future designated date.
(b)
Consists of stock units payable in cash to non-management directors after retirement and held in their Stock Unit Accounts. For a discussion of the Stock Unit Grant and Deferred Compensation Plan for non-management directors, see page 37. These amounts for the Named Executive Officers consist of 38,924; 43,432; 29,610; 131,794 and 49,360 unvested stock units owned by Mr. Gehringer, Ms. Hamann, Mr. Rocker, Mr. Vena and Ms. Whited awarded under Company stock plans. Stock units do not confer voting rights and are not considered beneficially owned shares of common stock under SEC rules.
(c)
Based solely upon information contained in Schedule 13G/A filed on February 13, 2024, reporting that, as of December 31, 2023, this holder held sole and shared voting power over 0 and 1,085,223 of these shares, respectively, and sole and shared dispositive power over 54,928,099 and 2,891,474 of these shares, respectively. The address of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, PA 19355.
(d)
Based solely upon information contained in Schedule 13G/A filed on January 26, 2024, reporting that, as of December 31, 2023, this holder held sole and shared voting power over 38,064,066 and 0 of these shares, respectively, and sole and shared dispositive power over 42,030,360 and 0 of these shares, respectively. The address of BlackRock, Inc. is 50 Hudson Yards, New York, NY 10001.
80

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Stock Ownership Requirements for Executives
The Company’s Compensation and Talent Committee believes that stock ownership will better align the interests of our executives, including the Named Executive Officers, with those of our shareholders by enhancing the focus of executives on the long-term success of the Company. We require our executives to achieve and maintain a specified amount of stock ownership acquired primarily through the exercise of options and the receipt of retention stock or retention stock units under our equity compensation programs.
Our Stock Ownership Guidelines require that the CEO hold at least seven (7) times annual salary and that the other Named Executive Officers hold at least four (4) times annual salary in stock or stock units. Until the required ownership target is achieved, executives must retain all of the shares of stock they receive from our plans, net of the shares of stock required, if any, to cover tax expense and the cost of exercising options. We do not include the following types of equity interests when calculating stock ownership under these guidelines: (i) unexercised stock options, (ii) unvested retention or performance shares or units, and (iii) any investment in the Company stock fund under the Thrift Plan, the Supplemental Thrift Plan or the Executive Incentive Deferral Plan.
As of December 31, 2024, all of the Named Executive Officers were in compliance with stock ownership requirements.
Hedging Our Common Stock Is Prohibited
Company policy prohibits directors and all employees (including our officers) from hedging Union Pacific common stock, such as (i) buying, selling or writing puts, calls or options related to our common stock and (ii) executing straddles, equity swaps and similar derivative arrangements that hedge our common stock. In addition, directors and executive officers may not pledge, deliver as collateral, or maintain a margin account with respect to shares of our common stock.
Insider Trading Arrangements and Policies
We are committed to promoting high standards of ethical business conduct and compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations. As part of this commitment, we have adopted our Confidentiality and Insider Trading Policy governing the purchase, sale, and/or other dispositions of our securities by our directors, officers, and employees and we follow internal preclearance procedures with respect to repurchases of Company stock. We believe our Confidentiality and Insider Trading Policy is reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules and regulations, and the exchange listing standards applicable to us. A copy of our Confidentiality and Insider Trading Policy, including any amendments thereto was filed as Exhibit 19 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Sales of Our Common Stock by Executive Officers and Directors
Under Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans
Executive Officers (including the Named Executive Officers and certain other executives in key positions) and directors who meet their applicable ownership requirements as described above may sell shares of our common stock subject to the following restrictions:
Executive officers and directors may only sell shares of our common stock that exceed their ownership target (the Eligible Shares).
Eligible Shares may be sold only pursuant to a written trading plan designed to comply with SEC Rule 10b5-1, that:
was adopted when a quarterly trading blackout was not in effect and when such executive officer or director was not in possession of material nonpublic information regarding the Company,
has been reviewed and approved by the Chief Legal Officer,
has been disclosed to the public in a manner determined by the Chief Legal Officer (public disclosure may not be required for certain executives who are not executive officers), and
has been in effect for at least 90 trading days from the date of disclosure of the trading plan to the public or approval by the Chief Legal Officer for trading plans not announced.
The total sales by an executive officer or director of Eligible Shares during any calendar year may not exceed 50% of the total shares of our common stock beneficially owned by such executive officer or director using the immediately preceding February 1st measurement date.
For purposes of this policy, the number of shares beneficially owned by an executive officer or director includes shares and units deferred by the executive officer or director and excludes any shares disclaimed by the executive officer or director for purposes of reporting beneficial ownership under Section 16 reporting of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). All of the reporting obligations of the executive officer or director under Section 16 apply to sales made pursuant to a 10b5-1 trading plan.
81

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NUMBER 4 – Shareholder Proposal Requesting an Amended Clawback Policy
John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, CA 90278, who reported owning 150 shares of the Company’s common stock, has submitted the following proposal. The proposal and supporting statement are presented as received in accordance with SEC rules, and the Company disclaims any responsibility for their content. If properly presented at the Annual Meeting by or on behalf of the proponent, the Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal.


Proposal 4 – Support Improved Clawback Policy for Unearned Executive Pay
Shareholders ask the Board of Directors to amend the Company Policy on recoupment of incentive pay to apply to each Named Executive Officer and to state that conduct or negligence – not merely misconduct – shall trigger mandatory application of that policy. Also the Board shall report to shareholders in each annual meeting proxy the results of any deliberations regarding the policy, including the Board’s reasons for not applying the policy after specific deliberations conclude, about whether or not to cancel or seek recoupment of unearned compensation paid, granted or awarded to NEOs under this policy.
This improved clawback policy shall at least be included in the Governess [sic] Guidelines of the Company or similar document and be easily accessible on the Company website.
The current Clawback Policy is incomplete and can be difficult for shareholders to access.
Wells Fargo offers a prime example of why Union Pacific needs a stronger policy. After 2016 Congressional hearings, Wells Fargo agreed to pay $185 million to resolve claims of fraudulent sales practices. The Wells Fargo Board then moved to claw back $136 million from 2 top executives. Wells Fargo unfortunately concluded that the CEO has only turned a blind eye to the practice of opening fraudulent accounts and thus failed to attempt any clawback and left $136 million on the table.
At minimum this proposal alerts Union Pacific shareholders that UNP executives can now be richly rewarded even when they are negligent. This is the wrong incentive for UNP executives at a time when the best incentives for UNP executives should be adopted.
Please vote yes:

Support Improved Clawback Policy for Unearned Executive Pay – Proposal 4
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors respectfully requests that shareholders vote AGAINST Proposal 4.
The Board of Directors has considered this proposal in light of our current practices and policies and concluded that the proposal is unnecessary, would not provide shareholders with meaningful additional information, and is not in the best interests of Union Pacific nor its shareholders and therefore recommends a vote AGAINST it.
Union Pacific Already Has a Robust Clawback Policy that is Readily Accessible and Applies a More Stringent Standard of Conduct than Requested by the Proposal.
Since 2020, the Union Pacific Corporation Policy for Recoupment of Incentive Compensation (“Clawback Policy”) has empowered the Compensation and Talent Committee (the “Committee”) to require Company executives to repay certain incentive compensation (or if such incentive compensation has not been paid or settled, the Company may cancel such incentive compensation) if the Committee determined either (a) that a financial restatement is required due to the Company’s material non-compliance with financial reporting requirements or if there was a material error in incentive compensation calculations, or (b) that the executive engaged in certain types of conduct, including for example negligent supervision or management of an employee whose actions (or inaction) results in one of these violations. This policy was filed as an exhibit to our 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K and thus has been publicly available for the past five years.1 Further, in 2023, we amended the Clawback Policy to, among other things, include mandatory no-fault recoupment provisions prescribed by New York Stock Exchange rules. As required by SEC rules, these clawback provisions apply automatically to our Named Executive Officers in the event the Company is required to prepare a financial restatement, regardless of conduct or fault.
1 Union Pacific Corporation Policy for Recoupment of Certain Compensation,
https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/0000100885/000010088520000065/unp-20191231x10k.htm.
82

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NUMBER 4 – Shareholder Proposal Requesting an Amended Clawback Policy
The amended Clawback Policy was filed as Exhibit 97 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, and is posted on the Corporate Governance page of Company’s website for shareholders to access at investor.unionpacific.com/governance/governance-overview.
The Company’s Clawback Policy Already Covers More Than “Misconduct,” As Requested by the Proposal.
The proposal requests that the Company’s clawback policy state that “conduct or negligence” shall trigger mandatory application of the policy. Consistent with the NYSE rules, Part I.A of the Clawback Policy, addressing financial restatements, applies regardless of fault or misconduct of any individual. Therefore, in the context of financial restatements, our Clawback Policy has an even more stringent standard than the proposal’s requested minimum standard of “conduct or negligence.” Under the Clawback Policy, our Board need not make a determination that an officer of the Company was negligent or acted (or failed to act) at all in order for the policy to apply to our Section 16 Officers. If the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement (as defined by the NYSE listing standard), our Clawback Policy is automatically triggered, and the Company must “recover on a reasonably prompt basis” any excess incentive-based compensation from Section 16 Officers of the Company who received such compensation during the relevant period. Thus, our Clawback Policy already addresses the concerns raised by the proposal with a more stringent standard of conduct than requested.
Union Pacific Already Provides Detailed Disclosure Regarding Our Compensation Practices, Including Our Clawback Policy.
In addition to being fully available online, our Clawback Policy is described in this Proxy Statement in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, and accordingly, our shareholders have the opportunity each year to learn about and assess our compensation policies. Shareholders also already have many avenues to address our compensation practices, including through our annual advisory votes on executive compensation. Last year, approximately 96% of our shareholders (on a votes cast basis) approved our executive compensation.
In addition, SEC rules already include requirements to provide adequate disclosure about how we apply our Clawback Policy. For example, if the Company is required to claw back compensation from our Named Executive Officers as a result of a financial statement restatement, the Company is required to disclose in its next annual meeting proxy statement specific information about how it applied the Clawback Provisions, including the date of and amount of erroneously awarded compensation attributable to the accounting restatement, any estimates that were used in determining the amount, and the amount that remains to be collected or that is not being collected. If the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement but concludes that recovery of erroneously awarded compensation is not required under the Clawback Policy, the Company is required to briefly explain why application of the Clawback Policy resulted in this conclusion.
In summary, in light of our robust Clawback Policy, we have already addressed the concerns raised by the proposal, made our Clawback Policy readily publicly available, and will provide appropriate disclosure regarding application of the Clawback Policy in our annual proxy statement as required by NYSE and SEC rules. As a result, our Board believes that adoption of this proposal is unnecessary, would not provide shareholders with meaningful additional information, and is not in the best interests of the Company or our shareholders.
The Board of Directors respectfully requests that shareholders vote AGAINST
Proposal 4.
83

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Other Matters
Shareholder Proposals
Under SEC rules, any shareholder who wishes to present a proposal to be included in our Proxy Statement and introduced at our 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must submit the proposal to the Secretary of the Company so that it is received no later than the close of business (5:00 pm, central time) on November 25, 2025, and must satisfy the other requirements of SEC Rule 14a-8. Any shareholder who instead wishes to bring a proposal directly before the Company’s next Annual Meeting of Shareholders (other than certain proposals submitted only pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8) or nominate one or more director candidates other than under our proxy access Bylaw must provide written notice to the Secretary of the Company no earlier than January 8, 2026, and before the close of business (5:00 pm, central time) on February 7, 2026, and must otherwise provide the information and comply with the procedures set forth in the Company’s Bylaws, a copy of which is available on the Company’s website at investor.unionpacific.com/governance/governance-overview. In addition to satisfying the requirements in the Company’s Bylaws, a shareholder who intends to solicit proxies in support of nominees submitted under the advance notice Bylaws for our 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must also provide proper written notice that sets forth all information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act to the Secretary of the Company no later than the close of business (5:00 pm, central time) on March 9, 2026 (or, if the 2026 Annual Meeting is called for a date that is more than 30 days before or more than 30 days after such anniversary date, then notice must be provided not later than 60 calendar days prior to the date of the 2026 Annual Meeting or the 10th calendar day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the 2026 Annual Meeting is first made by the Company).
Shareholders may obtain a printed copy of the Company’s Bylaws by contacting the Secretary of the Company at the address set forth on the notice page of this Proxy Statement. If a shareholder wishing to make such a proposal fails to comply with the foregoing notice provision and does not also satisfy the requirements of SEC Rule14a-4(c)(1), the Company may exercise discretionary voting authority over proxies it solicits in determining how to vote on the proposal.
Any eligible shareholder wishing to nominate director candidates for inclusion in our Proxy Statement under our proxy access Bylaw provisions should refer to page 24 for applicable procedures and submission requirements.
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s executive officers, directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of the Company’s common stock with the SEC. SEC regulations require executive officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders to furnish the Company with copies of all forms they file pursuant to Section 16(a). As a matter of practice, the Company’s administrative staff assists the Company’s executive officers and directors in preparing initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership and filing such reports with the SEC.
Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms furnished to the Company and written representations from the Company’s executive officers and directors, there were no late filings in 2024.
Delivery of Documents to Shareholders Sharing an Address
The broker, bank or other nominee for any shareholder who is a beneficial owner, but not the record holder, of the Company’s common stock may deliver only one copy of the Company’s Proxy Statement and annual report to multiple shareholders who share the same address, unless that broker, bank or other nominee has received contrary instructions from one or more of the shareholders. The Company will deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the Proxy Statement and annual report to a shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the documents was delivered. A shareholder who wishes to receive a separate copy of the Proxy Statement and annual report, now or in the future, should submit a request to the Secretary of the Company by telephone at 402-544-5000 or by submitting a written request to the Secretary of the Company at the address listed below. Beneficial owners sharing an address who are receiving multiple copies of proxy materials and annual reports and wish to receive a single copy of such materials in the future will need to contact their broker, bank or other nominee to request that only a single copy of each document be mailed to all shareholders at the shared address in the future.
84

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Other Matters
Availability of Annual Report on Form 10-K
If you would like an additional copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, you may find this document at www.up.com under the “Investors” caption link. Alternatively, any shareholder wishing to receive, without charge, a copy of this document should send a written request to: Secretary, Union Pacific Corporation, 1400 Douglas Street, Omaha, NE 68179.
The references to the Company’s website in this Proxy Statement do not constitute, and should not be deemed, an incorporation by reference of the information contained on, or available through, the website. Therefore, such information should not be considered part of this Proxy Statement.
Other Business
The Board does not currently intend to bring any other business before the Annual Meeting, and is not aware of any other business to be brought before the Annual Meeting. If any other business is properly brought before the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted in accordance with the judgment of the proxy holders.
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote by telephone or Internet or complete, sign, date and promptly return the accompanying proxy card in the enclosed envelope.
 
Craig V. Richardson
Executive Vice President,
Chief Legal Officer and
Corporate Secretary
85


DEF 14A 0000100885 false 0000100885 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000100885 unp:VJamesVenaMember 2024-02-08 0000100885 unp:JenniferLHamannMember 2024-02-08 0000100885 unp:ElizabethFWhitedMember 2024-02-08 0000100885 unp:EricJGehringerMember 2024-02-08 0000100885 unp:KennyGRockerMember 2024-02-08 0000100885 unp:VJamesVenaMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000100885 unp:LanceMFritzMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000100885 unp:VJamesVenaMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 unp:LanceMFritzMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 unp:VJamesVenaMember 2022-01-01 2022-12-31 0000100885 unp:LanceMFritzMember 2022-01-01 2022-12-31 0000100885 2022-01-01 2022-12-31 0000100885 unp:VJamesVenaMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0000100885 unp:LanceMFritzMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0000100885 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0000100885 unp:VJamesVenaMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0000100885 unp:LanceMFritzMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0000100885 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0000100885 2023-01-01 2023-08-14 0000100885 2023-08-15 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:EqtyAwrdsInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:VJamesVenaMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000100885 ecd:EqtyAwrdsAdjsExclgValRprtdInSummryCompstnTblMember ecd:PeoMember unp:VJamesVenaMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000100885 ecd:AggtChngPnsnValInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:VJamesVenaMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000100885 ecd:AggtPnsnAdjsSvcCstMember ecd:PeoMember unp:VJamesVenaMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000100885 ecd:EqtyAwrdsInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:VJamesVenaMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:EqtyAwrdsAdjsExclgValRprtdInSummryCompstnTblMember ecd:PeoMember unp:VJamesVenaMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:AggtChngPnsnValInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:VJamesVenaMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:AggtPnsnAdjsSvcCstMember ecd:PeoMember unp:VJamesVenaMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:EqtyAwrdsInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:EqtyAwrdsAdjsExclgValRprtdInSummryCompstnTblMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:AggtChngPnsnValInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:AggtPnsnAdjsSvcCstMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:EqtyAwrdsInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2022-01-01 2022-12-31 0000100885 ecd:EqtyAwrdsAdjsExclgValRprtdInSummryCompstnTblMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2022-01-01 2022-12-31 0000100885 ecd:AggtChngPnsnValInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2022-01-01 2022-12-31 0000100885 ecd:AggtPnsnAdjsSvcCstMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2022-01-01 2022-12-31 0000100885 ecd:EqtyAwrdsInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0000100885 ecd:EqtyAwrdsAdjsExclgValRprtdInSummryCompstnTblMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0000100885 ecd:AggtChngPnsnValInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0000100885 ecd:AggtPnsnAdjsSvcCstMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0000100885 ecd:EqtyAwrdsInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0000100885 ecd:EqtyAwrdsAdjsExclgValRprtdInSummryCompstnTblMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0000100885 ecd:AggtChngPnsnValInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0000100885 ecd:AggtPnsnAdjsSvcCstMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0000100885 ecd:EqtyAwrdsInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000100885 ecd:EqtyAwrdsAdjsExclgValRprtdInSummryCompstnTblMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000100885 ecd:AggtChngPnsnValInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000100885 ecd:AggtPnsnAdjsSvcCstMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000100885 ecd:EqtyAwrdsInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:EqtyAwrdsAdjsExclgValRprtdInSummryCompstnTblMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:AggtChngPnsnValInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:AggtPnsnAdjsSvcCstMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:EqtyAwrdsInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2022-01-01 2022-12-31 0000100885 ecd:EqtyAwrdsAdjsExclgValRprtdInSummryCompstnTblMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2022-01-01 2022-12-31 0000100885 ecd:AggtChngPnsnValInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2022-01-01 2022-12-31 0000100885 ecd:AggtPnsnAdjsSvcCstMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2022-01-01 2022-12-31 0000100885 ecd:EqtyAwrdsInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0000100885 ecd:EqtyAwrdsAdjsExclgValRprtdInSummryCompstnTblMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0000100885 ecd:AggtChngPnsnValInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0000100885 ecd:AggtPnsnAdjsSvcCstMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0000100885 ecd:EqtyAwrdsInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0000100885 ecd:EqtyAwrdsAdjsExclgValRprtdInSummryCompstnTblMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0000100885 ecd:AggtChngPnsnValInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0000100885 ecd:AggtPnsnAdjsSvcCstMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0000100885 ecd:YrEndFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdInCvrdYrOutsdngAndUnvstdMember ecd:PeoMember unp:VJamesVenaMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000100885 ecd:VstngDtFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdAndVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:VJamesVenaMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000100885 ecd:ChngInFrValAsOfVstngDtOfPrrYrEqtyAwrdsVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:VJamesVenaMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000100885 ecd:ChngInFrValOfOutsdngAndUnvstdEqtyAwrdsGrntdInPrrYrsMember ecd:PeoMember unp:VJamesVenaMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000100885 ecd:YrEndFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdInCvrdYrOutsdngAndUnvstdMember ecd:PeoMember unp:VJamesVenaMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:VstngDtFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdAndVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:VJamesVenaMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:ChngInFrValAsOfVstngDtOfPrrYrEqtyAwrdsVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:VJamesVenaMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:ChngInFrValOfOutsdngAndUnvstdEqtyAwrdsGrntdInPrrYrsMember ecd:PeoMember unp:VJamesVenaMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:YrEndFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdInCvrdYrOutsdngAndUnvstdMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:VstngDtFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdAndVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:ChngInFrValAsOfVstngDtOfPrrYrEqtyAwrdsVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:ChngInFrValOfOutsdngAndUnvstdEqtyAwrdsGrntdInPrrYrsMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:FrValAsOfPrrYrEndOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdInPrrYrsFldVstngCondsDrngCvrdYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:YrEndFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdInCvrdYrOutsdngAndUnvstdMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2022-01-01 2022-12-31 0000100885 ecd:VstngDtFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdAndVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2022-01-01 2022-12-31 0000100885 ecd:ChngInFrValAsOfVstngDtOfPrrYrEqtyAwrdsVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2022-01-01 2022-12-31 0000100885 ecd:ChngInFrValOfOutsdngAndUnvstdEqtyAwrdsGrntdInPrrYrsMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2022-01-01 2022-12-31 0000100885 ecd:FrValAsOfPrrYrEndOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdInPrrYrsFldVstngCondsDrngCvrdYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2022-01-01 2022-12-31 0000100885 ecd:YrEndFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdInCvrdYrOutsdngAndUnvstdMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0000100885 ecd:VstngDtFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdAndVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0000100885 ecd:ChngInFrValAsOfVstngDtOfPrrYrEqtyAwrdsVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0000100885 ecd:ChngInFrValOfOutsdngAndUnvstdEqtyAwrdsGrntdInPrrYrsMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0000100885 ecd:FrValAsOfPrrYrEndOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdInPrrYrsFldVstngCondsDrngCvrdYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0000100885 ecd:YrEndFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdInCvrdYrOutsdngAndUnvstdMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0000100885 ecd:VstngDtFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdAndVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0000100885 ecd:ChngInFrValAsOfVstngDtOfPrrYrEqtyAwrdsVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0000100885 ecd:ChngInFrValOfOutsdngAndUnvstdEqtyAwrdsGrntdInPrrYrsMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0000100885 ecd:FrValAsOfPrrYrEndOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdInPrrYrsFldVstngCondsDrngCvrdYrMember ecd:PeoMember unp:LanceMFritzMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0000100885 ecd:YrEndFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdInCvrdYrOutsdngAndUnvstdMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000100885 ecd:VstngDtFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdAndVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000100885 ecd:ChngInFrValAsOfVstngDtOfPrrYrEqtyAwrdsVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000100885 ecd:ChngInFrValOfOutsdngAndUnvstdEqtyAwrdsGrntdInPrrYrsMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000100885 ecd:YrEndFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdInCvrdYrOutsdngAndUnvstdMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:VstngDtFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdAndVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:ChngInFrValAsOfVstngDtOfPrrYrEqtyAwrdsVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:ChngInFrValOfOutsdngAndUnvstdEqtyAwrdsGrntdInPrrYrsMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000100885 ecd:YrEndFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdInCvrdYrOutsdngAndUnvstdMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2022-01-01 2022-12-31 0000100885 ecd:VstngDtFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdAndVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2022-01-01 2022-12-31 0000100885 ecd:ChngInFrValAsOfVstngDtOfPrrYrEqtyAwrdsVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2022-01-01 2022-12-31 0000100885 ecd:ChngInFrValOfOutsdngAndUnvstdEqtyAwrdsGrntdInPrrYrsMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2022-01-01 2022-12-31 0000100885 ecd:YrEndFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdInCvrdYrOutsdngAndUnvstdMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0000100885 ecd:VstngDtFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdAndVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0000100885 ecd:ChngInFrValAsOfVstngDtOfPrrYrEqtyAwrdsVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0000100885 ecd:ChngInFrValOfOutsdngAndUnvstdEqtyAwrdsGrntdInPrrYrsMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0000100885 ecd:YrEndFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdInCvrdYrOutsdngAndUnvstdMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0000100885 ecd:VstngDtFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdAndVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0000100885 ecd:ChngInFrValAsOfVstngDtOfPrrYrEqtyAwrdsVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0000100885 ecd:ChngInFrValOfOutsdngAndUnvstdEqtyAwrdsGrntdInPrrYrsMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0000100885 1 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000100885 2 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000100885 3 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 xbrli:shares iso4217:USD xbrli:shares iso4217:USD xbrli:pure
v3.25.1
Cover
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2024
Document Information [Line Items]  
Document Type DEF 14A
Amendment Flag false
Entity Information [Line Items]  
Entity Registrant Name UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION
Entity Central Index Key 0000100885
v3.25.1
Pay vs Performance Disclosure - USD ($)
5 Months Ended 7 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2023
Aug. 14, 2023
Dec. 31, 2024
Dec. 31, 2023
Dec. 31, 2022
Dec. 31, 2021
Dec. 31, 2020
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure, Table    
Pay versus Performance Disclosure
The following table provides a summary of compensation actually paid, as defined by the SEC (CAP), to the principal executive officer (PEO), the average CAP for the other non-PEO named executive officers (Other NEOs), total shareholder return (TSR), net income and the Company-selected financial measure (CSM) of operating income for 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021 and 2020.
Year
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
PEO
V. James Vena
(a)
Compensation
Actually Paid
to PEO
V. James Vena
(a)
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
PEO
Lance M. Fritz
(a)
Compensation
Actually Paid
to PEO
Lance M. Fritz
(a)
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO
NEOs
(a)
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Non-PEO
NEOs
(a)
Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based On:
Net
Income
(c)
In Millions
CSM:
Operating
Income
(c)
In Millions
Company
TSR
Peer
Group
TSR
(b)
2024
$17,644,763
$12,782,098
$4,879,690
$3,865,271
$141
$156
$6,747
$9,713
2023
2,017,348
2,017,348
15,552,576
13,105,795
3,639,648
3,680,741
148
154
6,379
9,082
2022
14,326,072
5,546,491
2,690,886
2,533,173
122
128
6,998
9,917
2021
14,523,819
23,246,960
3,188,100
4,326,065
145
155
6,523
9,338
2020
16,632,099
14,075,218
4,297,722
5,491,165
118
117
5,349
7,834
(a)
Mr. Fritz, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer, served as our principal executive officer (PEO) for 2020, 2021, and 2022, and until August 14, 2023, when Mr. Vena became the CEO. The Other NEOs represent the following individuals for each of the years shown: Ms. Hamann, Ms. Whited, Mr. Rocker, and Mr. Gehringer for 2024, 2023, 2022, and 2021; and Mr. Vena (in his capacity as our then Chief Operating Officer), Ms. Hamann, Ms. Whited and Mr. Rocker for 2020.
(b)
The peer group index is the Dow Jones Transportation Index, which is included in Item 5 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.
(c)
Net income and operating income for 2022 reflect a $92 million one-time charge for the labor agreements reached with our labor unions. Net income and operating income for 2020 reflect a $278 million non-cash impairment charge related to our Brazos yard investment.
(d)
CAP is defined by the SEC to include not only actual take-home pay for the reported year, but also (i) the year-end value of equity awards granted during the reported year, and (ii) the change in the value of equity awards that were unvested at the end of the prior year, measured through the date such awards vested or were forfeited, or through the end of the reported fiscal year. To calculate CAP, the following amounts were deducted from and added to the applicable executives’ “total compensation” as reported in the Summary Compensation Table (SCT). No adjustments were made to Mr. Vena’s 2023 total compensation for purposes of calculating his 2023 CAP.
PEO V. James Vena SCT Total to CAP Reconciliation:
Year
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for PEO
Reported
Value of
Equity Awards
(i)
Equity Award
Adjustments
(ii)
Reported
Change in
the
Actuarial
Present
Value of
Pension
Benefits
(iii)
Pension
Benefit
Adjustments
(iv)
Compensation
Actually
Paid to
PEO
2024
$17,644,763
($12,000,196)
$7,137,531
$12,782,098
2023
2,017,348
2,017,348
PEO Lance M. Fritz SCT Total to CAP Reconciliation:
Year
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for PEO
Reported
Value of
Equity Awards
(i)
Equity Award
Adjustments
(ii)
Reported
Change in
the
Actuarial
Present
Value of
Pension
Benefits
(iii)
Pension
Benefit
Adjustments
(iv)
Compensation
Actually
Paid
to PEO
2023
$15,552,576
($12,000,274)
$10,562,712
($1,500,939)
$491,720
$13,105,795
2022
14,326,072
(12,000,163)
2,504,547
716,035
5,546,491
2021
14,523,819
(10,500,166)
18,510,398
(47,311)
760,220
23,246,960
2020
16,632,099
(10,500,105)
10,583,878
(3,269,470)
628,816
14,075,218
Average Non-PEO NEOs SCT Total to CAP Reconciliation:
Year
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for Non-PEO
NEOs
Average
Reported
Value of
Equity Awards
(i)
Equity Award
Adjustments
(ii)
Average
Reported
Change in
the
Actuarial
Present
Value of
Pension
Benefits
(iii)
Pension
Benefit
Adjustments
(iv)
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Non-PEO
NEOs
2024
$4,879,690
($2,812,707)
$1,639,815
($7,237)
$165,710
$3,865,271
2023
3,639,648
(2,025,201)
2,413,150
(682,484)
335,628
3,680,741
2022
2,690,886
(1,812,770)
594,285
1,060,772
2,533,173
2021
3,188,100
(1,475,163)
2,409,395
(367,668)
571,401
4,326,065
2020
4,297,722
(2,087,623)
4,094,333
(1,064,470)
251,203
5,491,165
(i)
The amounts included in this column are the grant date fair value of equity awards as reported in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns in the SCT for each applicable year.
(ii)
The equity award adjustments for each applicable year reflect the year-over-year change in the fair value of equity awards as itemized in the tables below
PEO V. James Vena Equity Award Adjustments Reconciliation:
Year
Fair Value as of Year-End
of Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Fair Value as of Vest Date of
Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Increase (Decrease) from Prior
Year-End in Fair Value of
Awards That Vested During the
Year
Year-over-Year Increase
(Decrease) in Fair Value of
Unvested Awards Granted in
Prior Years
Total Equity Award
Adjustments
2024
$7,137,531
$7,137,531
2023
PEO Lance M. Fritz Equity Award Adjustments Reconciliation:
Year
Fair Value as of Year-End of
Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Fair Value as of Vest Date of
Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Increase (Decrease) from Prior
Year-End in Fair Value of
Awards That Vested During the
Year
Year-over-Year Increase
(Decrease) in Fair Value of
Unvested Awards Granted in
Prior Years
Awards Forfeited
During the Year
Total Equity Award
Adjustments
2023
$11,353,821
$350,903
$3,250,480
($4,392,492)
$10,562,712
2022
8,228,329
(1,183,911)
(4,539,871)
2,504,547
2021
12,578,359
(1,151,373)
7,083,412
18,510,398
2020
11,615,105
4,891
(1,036,118)
10,583,878
Average Non-PEO NEOs Equity Award Adjustments Reconciliation:
Year
Fair Value as of Year-End of
Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Fair Value as of Vest Date of
Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Increase (Decrease) from Prior
Year-End in Fair Value of
Awards That Vested During the
Year
Year-over-Year Increase
(Decrease) in Fair Value of
Unvested Awards Granted in
Prior Years
Total Equity Award
Adjustments
2024
$1,672,955
$12,414
($45,554)
$1,639,815
2023
1,916,131
44,065
452,954
2,413,150
2022
1,242,989
(116,387)
(532,317)
594,285
2021
1,767,115
(83,871)
726,151
2,409,395
2020
2,576,000
1,372,918
(1,750)
147,165
4,094,333
(iii)
The amounts included in this column are the change in the present actuarial value of the executives’ accumulated benefit under the Company’s pension plan as reported in “Change in Pension and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column of the SCT for each applicable year.
(iv)
The total pension benefit adjustments for each applicable year include the actuarially determined service cost for services rendered during the applicable year (the “service cost”).
       
Company Selected Measure Name     operating income        
Named Executive Officers, Footnote    
(a)
Mr. Fritz, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer, served as our principal executive officer (PEO) for 2020, 2021, and 2022, and until August 14, 2023, when Mr. Vena became the CEO. The Other NEOs represent the following individuals for each of the years shown: Ms. Hamann, Ms. Whited, Mr. Rocker, and Mr. Gehringer for 2024, 2023, 2022, and 2021; and Mr. Vena (in his capacity as our then Chief Operating Officer), Ms. Hamann, Ms. Whited and Mr. Rocker for 2020.
       
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote    
(b)
The peer group index is the Dow Jones Transportation Index, which is included in Item 5 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.
       
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote    
(d)
CAP is defined by the SEC to include not only actual take-home pay for the reported year, but also (i) the year-end value of equity awards granted during the reported year, and (ii) the change in the value of equity awards that were unvested at the end of the prior year, measured through the date such awards vested or were forfeited, or through the end of the reported fiscal year. To calculate CAP, the following amounts were deducted from and added to the applicable executives’ “total compensation” as reported in the Summary Compensation Table (SCT). No adjustments were made to Mr. Vena’s 2023 total compensation for purposes of calculating his 2023 CAP.
PEO V. James Vena SCT Total to CAP Reconciliation:
Year
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for PEO
Reported
Value of
Equity Awards
(i)
Equity Award
Adjustments
(ii)
Reported
Change in
the
Actuarial
Present
Value of
Pension
Benefits
(iii)
Pension
Benefit
Adjustments
(iv)
Compensation
Actually
Paid to
PEO
2024
$17,644,763
($12,000,196)
$7,137,531
$12,782,098
2023
2,017,348
2,017,348
PEO Lance M. Fritz SCT Total to CAP Reconciliation:
Year
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for PEO
Reported
Value of
Equity Awards
(i)
Equity Award
Adjustments
(ii)
Reported
Change in
the
Actuarial
Present
Value of
Pension
Benefits
(iii)
Pension
Benefit
Adjustments
(iv)
Compensation
Actually
Paid
to PEO
2023
$15,552,576
($12,000,274)
$10,562,712
($1,500,939)
$491,720
$13,105,795
2022
14,326,072
(12,000,163)
2,504,547
716,035
5,546,491
2021
14,523,819
(10,500,166)
18,510,398
(47,311)
760,220
23,246,960
2020
16,632,099
(10,500,105)
10,583,878
(3,269,470)
628,816
14,075,218
(i)
The amounts included in this column are the grant date fair value of equity awards as reported in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns in the SCT for each applicable year.
(ii)
The equity award adjustments for each applicable year reflect the year-over-year change in the fair value of equity awards as itemized in the tables below
PEO V. James Vena Equity Award Adjustments Reconciliation:
Year
Fair Value as of Year-End
of Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Fair Value as of Vest Date of
Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Increase (Decrease) from Prior
Year-End in Fair Value of
Awards That Vested During the
Year
Year-over-Year Increase
(Decrease) in Fair Value of
Unvested Awards Granted in
Prior Years
Total Equity Award
Adjustments
2024
$7,137,531
$7,137,531
2023
PEO Lance M. Fritz Equity Award Adjustments Reconciliation:
Year
Fair Value as of Year-End of
Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Fair Value as of Vest Date of
Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Increase (Decrease) from Prior
Year-End in Fair Value of
Awards That Vested During the
Year
Year-over-Year Increase
(Decrease) in Fair Value of
Unvested Awards Granted in
Prior Years
Awards Forfeited
During the Year
Total Equity Award
Adjustments
2023
$11,353,821
$350,903
$3,250,480
($4,392,492)
$10,562,712
2022
8,228,329
(1,183,911)
(4,539,871)
2,504,547
2021
12,578,359
(1,151,373)
7,083,412
18,510,398
2020
11,615,105
4,891
(1,036,118)
10,583,878
(iii)
The amounts included in this column are the change in the present actuarial value of the executives’ accumulated benefit under the Company’s pension plan as reported in “Change in Pension and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column of the SCT for each applicable year.
(iv)
The total pension benefit adjustments for each applicable year include the actuarially determined service cost for services rendered during the applicable year (the “service cost”).
       
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount     $ 4,879,690 $ 3,639,648 $ 2,690,886 $ 3,188,100 $ 4,297,722
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount     $ 3,865,271 3,680,741 2,533,173 4,326,065 5,491,165
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote    
(d)
CAP is defined by the SEC to include not only actual take-home pay for the reported year, but also (i) the year-end value of equity awards granted during the reported year, and (ii) the change in the value of equity awards that were unvested at the end of the prior year, measured through the date such awards vested or were forfeited, or through the end of the reported fiscal year. To calculate CAP, the following amounts were deducted from and added to the applicable executives’ “total compensation” as reported in the Summary Compensation Table (SCT). No adjustments were made to Mr. Vena’s 2023 total compensation for purposes of calculating his 2023 CAP.
Average Non-PEO NEOs SCT Total to CAP Reconciliation:
Year
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for Non-PEO
NEOs
Average
Reported
Value of
Equity Awards
(i)
Equity Award
Adjustments
(ii)
Average
Reported
Change in
the
Actuarial
Present
Value of
Pension
Benefits
(iii)
Pension
Benefit
Adjustments
(iv)
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Non-PEO
NEOs
2024
$4,879,690
($2,812,707)
$1,639,815
($7,237)
$165,710
$3,865,271
2023
3,639,648
(2,025,201)
2,413,150
(682,484)
335,628
3,680,741
2022
2,690,886
(1,812,770)
594,285
1,060,772
2,533,173
2021
3,188,100
(1,475,163)
2,409,395
(367,668)
571,401
4,326,065
2020
4,297,722
(2,087,623)
4,094,333
(1,064,470)
251,203
5,491,165
(i)
The amounts included in this column are the grant date fair value of equity awards as reported in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns in the SCT for each applicable year.
(ii)
The equity award adjustments for each applicable year reflect the year-over-year change in the fair value of equity awards as itemized in the tables below
Average Non-PEO NEOs Equity Award Adjustments Reconciliation:
Year
Fair Value as of Year-End of
Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Fair Value as of Vest Date of
Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Increase (Decrease) from Prior
Year-End in Fair Value of
Awards That Vested During the
Year
Year-over-Year Increase
(Decrease) in Fair Value of
Unvested Awards Granted in
Prior Years
Total Equity Award
Adjustments
2024
$1,672,955
$12,414
($45,554)
$1,639,815
2023
1,916,131
44,065
452,954
2,413,150
2022
1,242,989
(116,387)
(532,317)
594,285
2021
1,767,115
(83,871)
726,151
2,409,395
2020
2,576,000
1,372,918
(1,750)
147,165
4,094,333
(iii)
The amounts included in this column are the change in the present actuarial value of the executives’ accumulated benefit under the Company’s pension plan as reported in “Change in Pension and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column of the SCT for each applicable year.
(iv)
The total pension benefit adjustments for each applicable year include the actuarially determined service cost for services rendered during the applicable year (the “service cost”).
       
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return    
CAP versus TSR
As shown in the chart below, the PEO’s CAP and Other NEOs’ Average CAP amounts are directionally aligned with the Company’s TSR. This is due primarily to the Company’s use of equity incentives, the value of which moves in line with our TSR, in addition to the Company’s financial performance. The Other NEOs’ Average CAP in 2020 also reflects the compensation of a more senior executive who ceased to serve as one of the Other NEOs in 2021. The Other NEO’s Average CAP increased in 2023 and 2024 due primarily to changes in the Company’s stock price and the election of Ms. Whited as the Company’s President. The PEO’s CAP in 2024 reflects Mr. Vena’s first full year of service as the CEO.
       
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income    
CAP versus Net Income
The Company’s net income increased in 2021, 2022 and 2024, and decreased in 2023, while the PEO and Other NEOs’ CAP has varied significantly each year. This is due in large part to the significant emphasis the Company places on equity incentives, the value of which are affected by our TSR. In addition, the Company does not use net income to determine compensation levels or incentive plan payouts.
       
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure    
CAP versus Operating Income – Company-Selected Measure (CSM)
Operating income and operating ratio (of which operating income is a component) are equally weighted financial measures used in our annual incentive plan, as described in our CD&A. In addition, performance stock units awarded to our NEOs are earned based one-third (1/3) on operating income growth (OIG). The Company’s operating income has steadily increased year-over-year, except for 2023, although its impact on the PEO’s and Other NEO’s CAP has been muted or offset by other performance measures and by changes in the Company’s stock price.
       
Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group    
TSR: Company versus Peer Group
The following chart presents the cumulative total shareholder return, assuming reinvestment of dividends, over the 5-year period for the Company (UNP) and the Dow Jones Transportation Index (DJ Trans). As the table demonstrates, the Company’s 5-year cumulative TSR is generally aligned with our peer group index.
       
Tabular List, Table    
Most Important Measures to Determine 2024 CAP
Below lists the most important financial metrics used to link 2024 CAP to Company performance. Operating income, operating ratio and return on invested capital are further described in our CD&A within the sections titled “2024 Annual Incentive Plan” and “Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation.”
Operating Income
Operating Ratio
Return on Invested Capital
       
Total Shareholder Return Amount     $ 141 148 122 145 118
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount     156 154 128 155 117
Net Income (Loss)     $ 6,747,000,000 $ 6,379,000,000 $ 6,998,000,000 $ 6,523,000,000 $ 5,349,000,000
Company Selected Measure Amount     9,713,000,000 9,082,000,000 9,917,000,000 9,338,000,000 7,834,000,000
PEO Name Mr. Vena Mr. Fritz Mr. Vena   Mr. Fritz Mr. Fritz Mr. Fritz
Equity Awards Adjustments, Footnote    
(ii)
The equity award adjustments for each applicable year reflect the year-over-year change in the fair value of equity awards as itemized in the tables below
PEO V. James Vena Equity Award Adjustments Reconciliation:
Year
Fair Value as of Year-End
of Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Fair Value as of Vest Date of
Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Increase (Decrease) from Prior
Year-End in Fair Value of
Awards That Vested During the
Year
Year-over-Year Increase
(Decrease) in Fair Value of
Unvested Awards Granted in
Prior Years
Total Equity Award
Adjustments
2024
$7,137,531
$7,137,531
2023
PEO Lance M. Fritz Equity Award Adjustments Reconciliation:
Year
Fair Value as of Year-End of
Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Fair Value as of Vest Date of
Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Increase (Decrease) from Prior
Year-End in Fair Value of
Awards That Vested During the
Year
Year-over-Year Increase
(Decrease) in Fair Value of
Unvested Awards Granted in
Prior Years
Awards Forfeited
During the Year
Total Equity Award
Adjustments
2023
$11,353,821
$350,903
$3,250,480
($4,392,492)
$10,562,712
2022
8,228,329
(1,183,911)
(4,539,871)
2,504,547
2021
12,578,359
(1,151,373)
7,083,412
18,510,398
2020
11,615,105
4,891
(1,036,118)
10,583,878
Average Non-PEO NEOs Equity Award Adjustments Reconciliation:
Year
Fair Value as of Year-End of
Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Fair Value as of Vest Date of
Equity Awards Granted during
the Year
Increase (Decrease) from Prior
Year-End in Fair Value of
Awards That Vested During the
Year
Year-over-Year Increase
(Decrease) in Fair Value of
Unvested Awards Granted in
Prior Years
Total Equity Award
Adjustments
2024
$1,672,955
$12,414
($45,554)
$1,639,815
2023
1,916,131
44,065
452,954
2,413,150
2022
1,242,989
(116,387)
(532,317)
594,285
2021
1,767,115
(83,871)
726,151
2,409,395
2020
2,576,000
1,372,918
(1,750)
147,165
4,094,333
       
Charges for labor agreements         $ 92,000,000    
Asset Impairment Charges             $ 278,000,000
Measure:: 1              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Name     Operating Income        
Measure:: 2              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Name     Operating Ratio        
Measure:: 3              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Name     Return on Invested Capital        
V. James Vena [Member]              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
PEO Total Compensation Amount     $ 17,644,763 $ 2,017,348 0 $ 0 0
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount     12,782,098 2,017,348 0 0 0
Lance M. Fritz [Member]              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
PEO Total Compensation Amount     0 15,552,576 14,326,072 14,523,819 16,632,099
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount     0 13,105,795 5,546,491 23,246,960 14,075,218
PEO | V. James Vena [Member] | Aggregate Change in Present Value of Accumulated Benefit for All Pension Plans Reported in Summary Compensation Table              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     0 0      
PEO | V. James Vena [Member] | Aggregate Pension Adjustments Service Cost              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     0 0      
PEO | V. James Vena [Member] | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     (12,000,196) 0      
PEO | V. James Vena [Member] | Equity Awards Adjustments, Excluding Value Reported in Compensation Table              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     7,137,531 0      
PEO | V. James Vena [Member] | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     7,137,531 0      
PEO | V. James Vena [Member] | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     0 0      
PEO | V. James Vena [Member] | Vesting Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     0 0      
PEO | V. James Vena [Member] | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     0 0      
PEO | Lance M. Fritz [Member] | Aggregate Change in Present Value of Accumulated Benefit for All Pension Plans Reported in Summary Compensation Table              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       (1,500,939) 0 (47,311) (3,269,470)
PEO | Lance M. Fritz [Member] | Aggregate Pension Adjustments Service Cost              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       491,720 716,035 760,220 628,816
PEO | Lance M. Fritz [Member] | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       (12,000,274) (12,000,163) (10,500,166) (10,500,105)
PEO | Lance M. Fritz [Member] | Equity Awards Adjustments, Excluding Value Reported in Compensation Table              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       10,562,712 2,504,547 18,510,398 10,583,878
PEO | Lance M. Fritz [Member] | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       11,353,821 8,228,329 12,578,359 11,615,105
PEO | Lance M. Fritz [Member] | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       3,250,480 (4,539,871) 7,083,412 (1,036,118)
PEO | Lance M. Fritz [Member] | Vesting Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       0 0 0 0
PEO | Lance M. Fritz [Member] | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       350,903 (1,183,911) (1,151,373) 4,891
PEO | Lance M. Fritz [Member] | Prior Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Any Prior Year that Fail to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       (4,392,492) 0 0 0
Non-PEO NEO | Aggregate Change in Present Value of Accumulated Benefit for All Pension Plans Reported in Summary Compensation Table              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     (7,237) (682,484) 0 (367,668) (1,064,470)
Non-PEO NEO | Aggregate Pension Adjustments Service Cost              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     165,710 335,628 1,060,772 571,401 251,203
Non-PEO NEO | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     (2,812,707) (2,025,201) (1,812,770) (1,475,163) (2,087,623)
Non-PEO NEO | Equity Awards Adjustments, Excluding Value Reported in Compensation Table              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     1,639,815 2,413,150 594,285 2,409,395 4,094,333
Non-PEO NEO | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     1,672,955 1,916,131 1,242,989 1,767,115 2,576,000
Non-PEO NEO | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     (45,554) 452,954 (532,317) 726,151 147,165
Non-PEO NEO | Vesting Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     0 0 0 0 1,372,918
Non-PEO NEO | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     $ 12,414 $ 44,065 $ (116,387) $ (83,871) $ (1,750)
v3.25.1
Award Timing Disclosure
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2024
Feb. 08, 2024
USD ($)
shares
$ / shares
Award Timing Disclosures [Line Items]    
Award Timing MNPI Disclosure
Policies and Practices Related to the Grant of Certain Equity Awards Close in Time to the Release of Material Nonpublic Information
Stock option grants to our NEOs are made annually at the February Compensation and Talent Committee meeting each year, and the grants are effective on the next day after approval by the Board as shown in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Fiscal Year 2024 Table and as reflected in the table below. It has been the Company’s long-standing practice that stock options are granted on this predetermined schedule. Our policy is to not grant stock options or similar awards in anticipation of the release of material nonpublic information that is likely to result in changes to the price of our common stock, such as a significant positive or negative earnings announcement, and we do not time the public release of such information based on stock option grant dates.
It has also been our longstanding practice to file the Company’s Form 10-K after review and approval by the Board at its February meeting. The Company’s earnings release for the fourth quarter of the prior year is in late January.
During the period covered by this report, we have not timed the disclosure of material nonpublic information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation.
 
Award Timing Method
Stock option grants to our NEOs are made annually at the February Compensation and Talent Committee meeting each year, and the grants are effective on the next day after approval by the Board as shown in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Fiscal Year 2024 Table and as reflected in the table below. It has been the Company’s long-standing practice that stock options are granted on this predetermined schedule. Our policy is to not grant stock options or similar awards in anticipation of the release of material nonpublic information that is likely to result in changes to the price of our common stock, such as a significant positive or negative earnings announcement, and we do not time the public release of such information based on stock option grant dates.
It has also been our longstanding practice to file the Company’s Form 10-K after review and approval by the Board at its February meeting. The Company’s earnings release for the fourth quarter of the prior year is in late January.
 
Award Timing Predetermined true  
Award Timing MNPI Considered false  
Award Timing, How MNPI Considered Our policy is to not grant stock options or similar awards in anticipation of the release of material nonpublic information that is likely to result in changes to the price of our common stock, such as a significant positive or negative earnings announcement, and we do not time the public release of such information based on stock option grant dates.
It has also been our longstanding practice to file the Company’s Form 10-K after review and approval by the Board at its February meeting. The Company’s earnings release for the fourth quarter of the prior year is in late January.
During the period covered by this report, we have not timed the disclosure of material nonpublic information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation.
 
MNPI Disclosure Timed for Compensation Value false  
Awards Close in Time to MNPI Disclosures, Table
Fiscal Year 2024 Grants of Certain Equity Awards Close in Time to the Release of Material Nonpublic Information
During the fiscal year ended 2024, each of our NEOs were awarded options with an effective grant date during any period beginning four business days before the filing or furnishing of a Form 10-Q, Form 10-K or Form 8-K that disclosed material nonpublic information, and ending one business day after the filing or furnishing of such reports, as summarized in the table below:
 
Grant Date
Number of Securities
Underlying the Award
Exercise Price
of the Award
($/Sh)
Grant Date Fair Value
of the Award
(a)
Percentage Change in the Closing Market Price of the Securities
Underlying the Award Between the Trading Day Ending
Immediately Prior to the Disclosure of Material Nonpublic
Information and the Trading Day Beginning Immediately
Following the Disclosure of Material Nonpublic Information (b)
V. James Vena
Chief Executive
Officer
2/8/2024
77,730
$248.82
$4,800,092
(0.6)%
Jennifer L. Hamann
EVP & Chief
Financial Officer
2/8/2024
17,814
248.82
1,100,075
(0.6)%
Elizabeth F. Whited
President
2/8/2024
25,911
248.82
1,600,092
(0.6)%
Eric J. Gehringer
EVP Operations
2/8/2024
16,194
248.82
1,000,035
(0.6)%
Kenny G. Rocker
EVP Marketing &
Sales
2/8/2024
12,957
248.82
800,139
(0.6)%
(a)
Amounts reported in this column reflect grant date fair values as calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.
(b)
The percentage change was determined using the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on February 8, 2024 of $248.82, which is also the trading day ending immediately prior to the Company’s filing of its 2024 Form 10-K, and the closing stock price of $247.40 on February 12, 2024, the trading day beginning immediately following the filing of the 2024 Form 10-K.
 
V. James Vena [Member]    
Awards Close in Time to MNPI Disclosures    
Name   V. James Vena
Underlying Securities | shares   77,730
Exercise Price | $ / shares   $ 248.82
Fair Value as of Grant Date | $   $ 4,800,092
Underlying Security Market Price Change   (0.006)
Jennifer L. Hamann [Member]    
Awards Close in Time to MNPI Disclosures    
Name   Jennifer L. Hamann
Underlying Securities | shares   17,814
Exercise Price | $ / shares   $ 248.82
Fair Value as of Grant Date | $   $ 1,100,075
Underlying Security Market Price Change   (0.006)
Elizabeth F. Whited [Member]    
Awards Close in Time to MNPI Disclosures    
Name   Elizabeth F. Whited
Underlying Securities | shares   25,911
Exercise Price | $ / shares   $ 248.82
Fair Value as of Grant Date | $   $ 1,600,092
Underlying Security Market Price Change   (0.006)
Eric J. Gehringer [Member]    
Awards Close in Time to MNPI Disclosures    
Name   Eric J. Gehringer
Underlying Securities | shares   16,194
Exercise Price | $ / shares   $ 248.82
Fair Value as of Grant Date | $   $ 1,000,035
Underlying Security Market Price Change   (0.006)
Kenny G. Rocker [Member]    
Awards Close in Time to MNPI Disclosures    
Name   Kenny G. Rocker
Underlying Securities | shares   12,957
Exercise Price | $ / shares   $ 248.82
Fair Value as of Grant Date | $   $ 800,139
Underlying Security Market Price Change   (0.006)
v3.25.1
Insider Trading Policies and Procedures
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2024
Insider Trading Policies and Procedures [Line Items]  
Insider Trading Policies and Procedures Adopted true

Grafico Azioni Union Pacific (NYSE:UNP)
Storico
Da Mar 2025 a Apr 2025 Clicca qui per i Grafici di Union Pacific
Grafico Azioni Union Pacific (NYSE:UNP)
Storico
Da Apr 2024 a Apr 2025 Clicca qui per i Grafici di Union Pacific