SAIA Saia Inc

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders

To be held April 24, 2025

March 17, 2025

To Our Stockholders:

We cordially invite you to attend the 2025 annual meeting of stockholders of Saia, Inc. The meeting will be held in a virtual format on April 24, 2025, at 10:30 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time. Stockholders will not be able to attend the annual meeting physically but will be able to participate by submitting questions and voting online. To be admitted to the virtual annual meeting at https://meetnow.global/M9QKMU9, you must enter the control number found on your proxy card, voter instruction form or the notice. A list of stockholders entitled to vote will be available via electronic link during the whole time of the annual meeting once you are admitted to the meeting room. We look forward to your participation.

The purpose of the meeting is to:

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 3, 2025 may vote at the meeting or any postponements or adjournments of the meeting.

By order of the Board of Directors,

Matthew J. Batteh

Secretary

PROXY SUMMARY

PROXY SUMMARY

PROXY SUMMARY

PROXY SUMMARY

SAIA, INC.

11465 Johns Creek Parkway, Suite 400

Johns Creek, Georgia 30097

2025 PROXY STATEMENT

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Saia, Inc. (“Saia” or the “Company”) is furnishing you this proxy statement in connection with the solicitation of proxies on its behalf for the 2025 annual meeting of stockholders. The meeting will be held in a virtual format on April 24, 2025, at 10:30 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time. Stockholders will not be able to attend the annual meeting physically. To be admitted to the virtual annual meeting at https://meetnow.global/M9QKMU9, you must enter the control number found on your proxy card, voter instruction form or the notice you previously received. At the meeting, stockholders will vote on (a) the election of ten directors for a one year term to expire at the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified, (b) an advisory basis to approve the compensation of Saia’s Named Executive Officers, (c) the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as Saia’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2025, and (d) the transaction of any other business that may properly come before the meeting, and any postponement or adjournment of the meeting, although we know of no other business to be presented.

By submitting your proxy (either by signing and returning the enclosed proxy card or by voting electronically on the internet or by telephone), you authorize Frederick J. Holzgrefe, III and Richard D. O’Dell and each of them to represent you and vote your shares at the meeting in accordance with your instructions. They also may vote your shares to adjourn the meeting and will be authorized to vote your shares at any postponements or adjournments of the meeting.

Saia’s Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, which includes Saia’s audited annual consolidated financial statements, accompanies this proxy statement. Although the Annual Report is being distributed with this proxy statement, it does not constitute a part of the proxy solicitation materials and is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.

We are first sending this proxy statement, form of proxy and accompanying materials to stockholders on or about March 17, 2025.

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors

All directors of the Company are elected for a one-year term. The Board of Directors currently consists of ten directors.

The Board of Directors has nominated Di-Ann Eisnor, Donna E. Epps, John P. Gainor, Jr., Kevin A. Henry, Frederick J. Holzgrefe, III, Donald R. James, Randolph W. Melville, Richard D. O’Dell, Jeffrey C. Ward and Susan F. Ward for election as directors for terms expiring at the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Each nominee currently serves as a director.

Each nominee has consented to being named in this proxy statement and has agreed to serve if elected. If a nominee is unable to stand for election, the Board of Directors may either reduce the number of directors to be elected or select a substitute nominee. If a substitute nominee is selected, the proxy holders will vote your shares for the substitute nominee, unless you vote “against” or “abstain”. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the ten nominees named herein.

In addition to the information presented below regarding the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of each nominee that led the Board of Directors to the conclusion that such person should serve as a director, the Board also believes that all of the nominees have a reputation for high personal and professional ethics, integrity, values and character. Each nominee brings a strong and unique background and set of skills to the Board of Directors, giving the Board as a whole competence and experience in a wide variety of areas, including corporate governance and board service, executive and operations management, strategic planning, sales and marketing, the less-than-truckload (“LTL”) and transportation industry, accounting and finance, and risk assessment. They have demonstrated business acumen and an ability to exercise sound judgment, as well as a commitment of service to the Company and the Board. Each nominee is committed to achieving, monitoring and improving on the Company’s business strategy.

PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Board Nomination Process

The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for recommending director candidates to the Board of Directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee will apply the criteria set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines when considering whether to recommend any candidate as a director nominee, including candidates recommended by stockholders. The Nominating and Governance Committee seeks nominees with a broad range of experience, professions, skills, geographic representation and backgrounds. The Nominating and Governance Committee believes that the backgrounds and qualifications of the directors, considered as a group, should provide a significant composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will allow the Board to fulfill its responsibilities.

The Corporate Governance Guidelines include director qualification standards that provide as follows:

While the selection of qualified directors is a complex, subjective process that requires consideration of many intangible factors, the Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that directors and candidates for director generally should, at a minimum, meet the following criteria:

If a vacancy arises or the Board decides to expand its membership, the Nominating and Governance Committee may seek recommendations of potential candidates from a variety of sources (including incumbent directors, stockholders, the Company’s management and professional recruitment firms). The Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates each potential candidate’s educational background, employment history, outside commitments and other relevant factors to determine whether he or she is potentially qualified to serve on the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee seeks to identify and recruit the best available candidates. The Committee evaluates qualified candidates recommended by stockholders on the same basis as those submitted by other sources. Stockholders who wish to recommend a candidate for director or nominate a candidate for election at an annual meeting should follow the procedures described on page 68.

The Board is committed to having individuals from different backgrounds with varying perspectives, professional experience, education and skills serving as members of the Board and believes a variety of perspectives and experiences is an important feature of a well-functioning board. The Board believes the composition of the Board reflects this commitment.

PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Director Skills

Board Refreshment

In the past six years, the Company has refreshed its Board by adding five new directors, four of whom are independent. The Company believes that it benefits from having longer tenured directors, including our Chairman, on the Board who are familiar with the Company’s business. We believe the average tenure of our directors of nine years reflects the balance the Board seeks between different perspectives brought by longer-serving directors and new directors.

PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

INFORMATION CONCERNING DIRECTOR NOMINEES

The following sets forth certain information regarding each nominee for director of the Company. The information presented includes information provided to the Company by each nominee including such person’s name, age, principal occupation and business experience for at least the past five years, the names of other publicly-held companies of which such person currently serves as a director or has served as a director during the past five years and the year in which the nominee first became a director of Saia.

DI-ANN EISNOR

		Director Since: 2017   Age: 52   Committee Membership: •  Audit •  Compensation and Human Capital

PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

DONNA E. EPPS

		Director Since: 2019   Age: 60   Committee Membership: •  Audit •  Nominating and Governance

PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

JOHN P. GAINOR, JR.

		Director Since: 2016   Age: 68   Committee Membership: •  Compensation and Human Capital •  Nominating and Governance

PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

KEVIN A. HENRY

		Director Since: 2021   Age: 57   Committee Membership: •  Audit •  Compensation and Human Capital

FREDERICK J. HOLZGREFE, III

		Director Since: 2019   Age: 57   Committee Membership: •  None

PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

DONALD R. JAMES

		Director Since: 2021   Age: 52   Committee Membership: •  Audit •  Nominating and Governance

PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

RANDOLPH W. MELVILLE

		Director Since: 2015   Age: 66   Committee Membership: •  Compensation and Human Capital •  Nominating and Governance

PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

RICHARD D. O’DELL

		Director Since: 2006   Age: 63   Committee Membership: •  None

JEFFREY C. WARD

		Director Since: 2006   Age: 66   Committee Membership: •  Compensation and Human Capital •  Nominating and Governance

PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

SUSAN F. WARD

		Director Since: 2019   Age: 64   Committee Membership: •  Audit

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines establishing standards with respect to Board governance and meetings, Board composition, selection and election of directors, director responsibility, director access to management and independent advisors and non-employee director compensation. The Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board regularly reviews and assesses corporate governance developments and recommends to the Board modifications to the Corporate Governance Guidelines as warranted.

The Company has a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all directors, officers and employees, including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer. The Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as well as its Corporate Governance Guidelines, are available on the Company’s website, www.saia.com/about-us/investor-relations/governance.

Director Independence

In January 2025, the Board, with the assistance of the Nominating and Governance Committee, conducted an evaluation of director independence based on the rules and regulations of the Nasdaq Global Select Market (“Nasdaq”) and determined that each of Di-Ann Eisnor, Donna E. Epps, John P. Gainor, Jr., Kevin A. Henry, Donald R. James, Randolph W. Melville, Jeffrey C. Ward, and Susan F. Ward qualifies as an independent director under such rules and regulations. Mr. O’Dell, as a result of serving as Chief Executive Officer until 2020, and Mr. Holzgrefe, as a result of his current service as President and Chief Executive Officer, are not independent.

Compensation of Directors

Our non-employee directors receive annual compensation as shown in the table below for service on the Board. Director compensation is approved by the Board based on the recommendation of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee, except that Committee sets the number of shares of restricted stock to be issued to non-employee directors each year. To assist in establishing non-employee director compensation, Mercer, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee’s executive compensation consultant, conducts an annual review of Saia’s non-employee director compensation program to assess its competitiveness and advises the Committee of recent market trends as to director compensation. As part of the review, the consultant analyzes Saia’s non-employee director compensation relative to a composite of peer group data and relevant cross-industry survey data. Based in part on the consultant’s study, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee annually makes a recommendation concerning non-employee director compensation for approval by the full Board. Directors who are Company employees do not receive any additional compensation for their service as directors. Mr. Holzgrefe, as an employee of Saia, did not receive any compensation for his service as a director in 2024.

Summary Compensation Information

The amounts payable to Saia’s non-employee directors for 2024 are indicated below:

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Following an analysis conducted by Mercer, on January 31, 2025, the Board increased the annual retainer for each non-employee director from $65,000 to $75,000, effective immediately following the annual meeting of stockholders in April 2025, to align director compensation with market. On January 30, 2025, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee approved a grant of 318 shares of restricted stock to each non-employee director based on its decision to award restricted stock with a value of $160,000 using the closing stock price on February 5, 2025. These shares are to be issued on May 1, 2025. No other changes were made to director compensation for 2025.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth all compensation earned by the Company’s non-employee directors for service as a director for the year ended December 31, 2024.

2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan

Under the 2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan, each non-employee director receives an annual grant of restricted stock, with the number of shares determined by the Compensation and Human Capital Committee and with the value on the grant date not to exceed $500,000. The shares of restricted stock are issued on the first business day in May each year following the annual meeting of stockholders. For 2024, each non-employee director received 301 shares of restricted stock on May 1, 2024 based on the determination by the Compensation and Human Capital Committee to award non-employee directors restricted stock with a value of $160,000 using the closing stock price on February 6, 2024. The shares of restricted stock are subject to a one-year cliff vesting restriction, subject to earlier vesting upon cessation of the director’s service on the Board (other than for cause) or upon a change in control of the Company.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Under the 2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan, each non-employee director has the option to receive up to 100% of his or her annual Board and Committee retainers in shares of common stock in lieu of cash, with the value of the shares to be computed by reference to the fair market value of Saia’s common stock on the date of grant.

Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan

Under the Director’s Deferred Fee Plan, non-employee directors may elect to defer all or a portion of their annual fees and retainers earned. The deferrals are converted into units equivalent to the value of Company common stock. Upon the director’s termination, death or disability, accumulated deferrals are distributed in the form of Company common stock in accordance with elections made by the directors. The following non-employee directors held units under the Director’s Deferred Fee Plan as of December 31, 2024, for the following number of shares: Ms. Epps 548 shares; Mr. Gainor 17,718 shares; Mr. Henry 2,399 shares; Mr. Melville 22,585 shares; Mr. Ward 56,600 shares and Ms. Ward 2,104 shares.

Other

All non-employee directors are reimbursed for travel and other out-of-pocket expenses related to Board and Committee meetings. Saia provides customary liability insurance for its directors and officers. The annual cost of this coverage for 2024 was $1.1 million. See “Related Party Transactions” for a detailed description of indemnification agreements that Saia has with its directors.

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

In order to align non-employee directors’ interests with those of the Company and its stockholders, the Board has approved stock ownership guidelines for the Company’s non-employee directors. Under the guidelines, non-employee directors have three years from the date they joined the Board to acquire shares of the Company’s common stock valued at five times the then-current annual retainer for non-employee directors. Units held in the Company’s Director’s Deferred Fee Plan are included as units of stock for the purposes of the guidelines. Under Company policy, non-employee directors are precluded from selling shares earned as a director until the director is in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines. All of our non-employee directors have met their objectives within the three-year time requirement.

Majority Voting Standard for Director Elections

The election of directors at the 2025 annual meeting of stockholders is an uncontested election under the Company’s Bylaws. Because this is an uncontested election, a nominee for director is elected to the Board if the votes cast for such nominee’s election exceed the votes cast against such nominee’s election. Abstentions will not affect the election of directors. In tabulating the voting results for the election of directors, only “FOR” and “AGAINST” votes are counted. If an incumbent director fails to receive a majority of the vote for re-election in an uncontested election, the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board will act on an expedited basis to determine whether to accept the director’s previously tendered irrevocable resignation and will submit such recommendation for prompt consideration by the Board. In considering whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation, the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board will consider any factors they deem relevant. Any director who fails to receive a majority of the vote for re-election will not participate in the Nominating and Governance Committee recommendation or Board decision whether to accept the tendered resignation.

Election to the Company’s Board of Directors in a contested election is by a plurality of the votes cast at any meeting of stockholders having a quorum. An election will be considered contested if (i) the Secretary of the Company receives a notice that a stockholder has nominated a person for election to the Board of Directors in compliance with the advance notice requirements for stockholder nominees for director set forth in the Company’s Bylaws and (ii) such nomination has not been withdrawn by such stockholder on or before the 10th day before the Company first mails its notice of meeting for such meeting to the stockholders. If directors are to be elected by a plurality of the votes cast, stockholders are not permitted to vote against a nominee.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Meetings, Committees of the Board and Board Leadership Structure

Attendance at Board and Committee Meetings; Executive Sessions

The Board of Directors held six meetings in 2024. Each director attended at least 75% of the meetings convened by the Board and the applicable Committees during such director’s service on the Board during 2024.

Executive sessions of independent directors are held as part of each regularly scheduled meeting of the Board. The sessions of the independent directors are chaired by the Lead Independent Director.

Annual Evaluation Process of the Board and Committees

With oversight by the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Board of Directors and each of its Committees conducts annual performance evaluations that are intended to determine whether the Board and its Committees are functioning effectively and to provide the directors the opportunity to reflect upon and improve processes and effectiveness. Each Committee and the full Board reviews and discusses the results of the Committee and Board evaluations. The goal is to use the results of the assessment process to enhance the functioning of the Board and the Committees and assist the Board and Committees to carry out their oversight functions.

Director Orientation and Continuing Education

The Company conducts an orientation program for each new director that includes, among other things, a review of the Company’s business strategy and operations, technology, financial condition, legal and regulatory framework and other relevant topics. The Company also provides continuing education opportunities and programs for current directors. These programs include presentation by outside subject matter experts, participation in governance and industry seminars and visits to Company facilities.

Board Leadership Structure

Saia’s Board structure provides for a Chief Executive Officer separate from the Chairman of the Board. The Board believes maintaining separate roles allows the Chairman to devote his time and attention to matters of Board oversight and governance and allows the Chief Executive Officer to focus his time and energy managing the business.

The Board of Directors designates a director to serve as Chairman of the Board and selected Richard D. O’Dell to serve as Chairman. The primary responsibilities of the Chairman are to:

Because the Board has determined that Mr. O’Dell is not independent under Nasdaq rules and regulations, the Board also utilizes a Lead Independent Director, who is selected by the independent directors. The independent directors

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

elected Randolph W. Melville as Lead Independent Director in 2024. The primary responsibilities of the Lead Independent Director are to:

In addition, the Lead Independent Director has the authority to call meetings of independent directors. If requested by major stockholders, the Lead Independent Director will make himself reasonably available for direct communication.

Board’s Role in Corporate Strategy

The Board is actively involved in overseeing, reviewing and guiding the Company’s corporate strategy. The Board formally reviews the Company’s business strategy, including the risks and opportunities facing the Company and its business, at an annual strategic planning session. In addition, long-range strategic issues are discussed as a matter of course at regular Board meetings. The Board regularly discusses corporate strategy throughout the year with management formally as well as informally and during executive sessions of the Board as appropriate. As discussed in “Board’s Role in Risk Management Process” below, the Board views risk management and oversight as an integral part of the strategic planning process, and provides oversight of management’s process to identify, manage and mitigate risks inherent in the Company’s strategic plans.

Board’s Role in Risk Management Process

The Company’s senior management has the responsibility to develop and implement the Company’s strategic plans and to identify, evaluate, manage, and mitigate the risks inherent in those plans. It is the responsibility of the Board to oversee the development and execution of the Company’s strategic plans and to understand the associated risks and the steps that senior management is taking to manage and mitigate those risks. As part of its risk management oversight, the full Board, based on input from management and the Nominating and Governance Committee, conducts reviews throughout the year to assess the Company’s strategy and risk management, including a review of specific risks, ranking of the likelihood and significance of those risks, and a review of mitigation plans. The Board also periodically receives briefings from outside experts on key risks facing the Company and has full access to management, as well as the ability to engage independent advisors.

The Board executes its oversight responsibility both through active review and discussion of key risks facing the Company and by delegating certain oversight responsibilities to the Board Committees, each of which reports regularly to the full Board. The full Board has retained responsibility for oversight of strategic risks as well as risks not otherwise delegated to one of the Committees, including cybersecurity and safety, in order to keep the full Board directly apprised of these matters and to utilize the expertise of the full Board.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The following is a summary of the general risk oversight functions of the Committees:

COMMITTEE RISK OVERSIGHT

Succession Planning

Succession planning and leadership development are key priorities for the Board and management. The Board regularly reviews the Company’s human capital related activities in support of the Company’s business strategy, which includes a discussion of the Company’s training and development programs, leadership bench and succession plans with a focus on key positions at the senior executive level and other critical roles. The Board also has regular and direct exposure to high potential leaders through formal Board and Committee presentations and informal events.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Committees

The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, a Compensation and Human Capital Committee and a Nominating and Governance Committee, each of which is comprised entirely of independent directors. Current Committee memberships are as follows:

Each of the Committees acts pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board. A copy of each Committee charter is available on the Company’s website, www.saia.com/about-us/investor-relations/governance.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee has been established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Securities Exchange Act of 1934”). The Audit Committee held five meetings in 2024. The functions of the Audit Committee are described in the Audit Committee Charter and include, among others, the following:

The Board of Directors has determined that Ms. Ward and Ms. Epps are “audit committee financial experts,” as defined by applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each member of the Audit Committee meets the definition of an independent director under applicable Nasdaq rules.

Compensation and Human Capital Committee

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee held six meetings in 2024. The functions of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee are described in the Compensation and Human Capital Committee Charter and include, among others, the following:

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Each member of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee qualifies as (i) an independent director under applicable Nasdaq rules and Rule 10C-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) a “non-employee director” for purposes of Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee retained Mercer as its executive compensation consultant to provide information and analysis of executive compensation trends and practices and to make recommendations regarding executive compensation. Mercer reports directly to and takes direction from the Compensation and Human Capital Committee, pursuant to an engagement agreement that is entered into on an annual basis and that may be terminated at any time. The Committee periodically meets with the Mercer consultant outside the presence of management to discuss executive compensation philosophy, composition of peer groups, to recommend specific levels of compensation and to ensure that Mercer receives from management the information required to perform its duties on a timely basis.

For 2024, the Company paid Mercer $0.1 million for executive and director compensation services rendered to the Compensation and Human Capital Committee. Mercer is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (“MMC”). Since 2010, including during 2024, the Company has used Marsh USA, Inc., an affiliate of MMC, to provide insurance brokerage services, based on a determination made by management of the expertise of Marsh USA, Inc. in providing insurance brokerage services for the transportation industry. The Company paid Marsh USA, Inc. $1.9 million in fees in 2024 for such insurance brokerage services (this amount does not include insurance premiums that are paid through Marsh USA, Inc. to insurance carriers on behalf of Saia).

In connection with the Compensation and Human Capital Committee’s consideration of the independence of Mercer, the Committee confirmed with Mercer that:

In its evaluation of the relationship with Mercer, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee also reviewed the protocols used by the Committee in its dealings with Mercer which include:

Following this assessment of the relationship of Mercer and its affiliates with the Company, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee concluded that Mercer’s work for the Committee does not raise any conflict of interest and that Mercer qualified as independent.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Nominating and Governance Committee

The Nominating and Governance Committee held three meetings in 2024. The functions of the Nominating and Governance Committee are described in the Nominating and Governance Committee Charter and include, among others, the following:

Each member of the Nominating and Governance Committee meets the definition of an independent director under applicable Nasdaq rules.

Stockholder Communications with the Board of Directors

Stockholders seeking to communicate with the Board of Directors should submit their written correspondence to the Secretary of the Company, Saia, Inc., 11465 Johns Creek Parkway, Suite 400, Johns Creek, Georgia 30097. The Secretary of the Company will forward all such communications (excluding routine advertisements and business solicitations and communications that the Secretary of the Company, in his or her sole discretion, deems to be a security risk or for harassment purposes) to each member of the Board of Directors, or if applicable, to the individual director(s) named in the correspondence. Subject to the following, the Chairman of the Board and the Lead Independent Director will receive copies of all stockholder communications, including those addressed to individual directors. The Secretary will consider each communication to determine whether it should be forwarded promptly or compiled and sent with other communications and other Board materials in advance of the next scheduled Board meeting.

The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that absent unusual circumstances, directors are expected to attend all annual meetings of stockholders. All members of the Board of Directors attended the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders.

Stock Ownership

Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth the amount of Saia’s common stock beneficially owned by each director and each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 39 and all directors and executive officers as a group, as of January 15, 2025. Unless otherwise indicated, beneficial ownership is direct and the person indicated has sole voting and investment power.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our executive compensation philosophy and programs, the decisions the Compensation and Human Capital Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) has made under those programs and the factors considered in making those decisions. This Compensation Discussion and Analysis focuses on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers for 2024, who were:

Mr. Col stepped down as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Mr. Batteh replaced him in the position, effective on May 13, 2024. Mr. Col remained with the Company as an advisor until his retirement on February 15, 2025.

Executive Summary

The following provides an overview of our compensation philosophy, including the focus on pay for performance, best practice pay programs and alignment of the interests of Saia’s executives with those of Saia’s stockholders. Details about the compensation awarded to Saia’s Named Executive Officers can be found in the Summary Compensation Table and related compensation tables in this proxy statement.

The Company’s executive compensation program is designed to link pay with performance by requiring that a significant portion of each executive’s target compensation is at risk and is earned based on achieving corporate financial and operating targets, total stockholder return and stock price appreciation.

All long-term compensation is paid through equity awards in the form of performance stock units and restricted stock. The Company maintains stock ownership guidelines for the executive officers to further align the interests of our executive officers with our stockholders.

Saia’s executive compensation program is designed to provide target compensation around the 50th percentile of market but can be higher or lower for an executive based on individual performance, tenure, additional responsibility of the executive and for retention and succession planning purposes. The Compensation Committee retains an independent executive compensation consultant to assist with an annual review of executive compensation trends and practices and to make recommendations regarding the Company’s executive compensation program.

In accordance with the recommendations of our stockholders, Saia holds a stockholder advisory “say-on-pay” vote on an annual basis. In 2024, holders of 96.6% of Saia’s stock voting on the matter approved, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to Saia’s Named Executive Officers as described in the 2024 proxy statement. The Compensation Committee believes this vote demonstrates strong support by our stockholders of our compensation philosophy and goals and the compensation decisions made by the Committee. Based on strong say-on-pay voting results in recent years, the Compensation Committee was encouraged to continue its practices in determining executive compensation.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Key Features of Saia’s Executive Compensation Program

Financial and Operating Performance

The following graphs highlight Saia’s financial and operating performance for fiscal years 2022-2024:

Executive Compensation Changes for 2024

Based on the strong support of our stockholders to our executive compensation philosophy, goals and decisions, as expressed in recent say-on-pay votes, the Compensation Committee did not make significant changes to the executive compensation program for 2024. Changes made to compensation of the Named Executive Officers for 2024 include:

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The Compensation Committee approved a 4% base salary increase for the Named Executive Officers, effective on January 1, 2024, following a recommendation of the Committee’s executive compensation consultant.

Executive Compensation Oversight

Role of Compensation Committee

Saia’s executive compensation program is designed and administered by the Compensation Committee, which is made up entirely of independent directors. The Compensation Committee, with the assistance of Mercer, its independent compensation consultant, annually reviews the Company’s compensation philosophy, the overall design of the compensation program and the elements of each component of compensation. In making decisions about compensation for the Named Executive Officers, as described in the compensation tables in this proxy statement, the Compensation Committee takes the following factors into consideration, among others, although none of these factors is determinative individually:

The Compensation Committee reviews and approves all elements of our executive compensation program, other than Mr. Holzgrefe’s compensation, which is approved by the full Board, based on an assessment of his performance conducted by the Board and based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Holzgrefe makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee concerning the compensation of his direct reports and provides performance reviews to assist the Compensation Committee in setting executive compensation.

Role of Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee retained Mercer as its executive compensation consultant to provide information and analysis of executive compensation trends and practices and to make recommendations regarding executive compensation. Mercer reports directly to and takes direction from the Compensation Committee. The Committee enters into an engagement agreement with Mercer on an annual basis, following a formal evaluation of their performance, and may terminate the engagement at any time. The Committee periodically meets with the Mercer consultant outside the presence of management to discuss executive compensation philosophy, composition of peer groups, to recommend specific levels of compensation and to ensure that Mercer receives from management the information required to perform its duties on a timely basis.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Additional Information

Additional information about the structure and practices of the Compensation Committee and role of the compensation consultant is presented under the headings Corporate Governance – Board Meetings, Committees of the Board and Leadership Structure and Board Committees – Compensation and Human Capital Committee in this proxy statement.

Executive Compensation Philosophy

The Compensation Committee believes that the executive compensation program should link pay with performance and should attract, motivate, reward and facilitate the retention of the executive talent required to achieve corporate objectives and to create value for the Company’s stockholders. We seek to align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders through an annual incentive plan based on annual operating income and operating ratio because we believe those metrics are important in determining our stock price, and through long-term equity incentives in the form of performance stock units and restricted stock. Our compensation program has achieved strong support from our stockholders with over 96.6% of the shares voting on the matter at the 2024 annual stockholders meeting having voted in favor of approval of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in the 2024 proxy statement.

Executive Compensation Components

The specific components, key characteristics and objectives of Saia’s executive compensation program are:

Pay Equity

To create stockholder value and motivate its employees, the Company is committed to internal and external pay equity. To assess internal pay equity, the Compensation Committee annually reviews the relationship between the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer to that of other Named Executive Officers and salaried employees generally. During the past three years, the Chief Executive Officer’s total direct compensation (salary and short- and long-term incentive awards) has been approximately 2.28 times the total direct compensation of the next highest paid Named Executive Officer, which the Committee believes is an appropriate multiple based on the additional responsibilities of the Chief Executive Officer. To test external pay equity, the Committee annually reviews compensation data for similar positions at peer group companies, described below, in the transportation industry with revenues comparable to Saia’s and data from general industry surveys.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Market Review

To assist the Compensation Committee in determining the design, components and levels of compensation for the Company’s executive officers, the Committee annually reviews compensation data for similar positions at a select group of transportation peer companies and based on published general industry surveys. The peer group is comprised of U.S. publicly traded transportation companies with annual revenues of approximately one-half to three times Saia’s revenues. The Committee also reviews published industry survey data provided by Mercer, including the Mercer U.S. Executive Remuneration Suite and the Willis Towers Watson Top Management Compensation Survey. With input from Mercer, the Committee selected these transportation peers and industry sources because it believes companies with a scale comparable to Saia’s are our primary competitors for executive talent and provide a sound basis to assess Saia’s executive compensation.

The peer group used by the Compensation Committee in 2023 to assist in setting compensation for 2024 was:

Some of the peer group companies have substantial stock ownership by executives. If the stock ownership amounts were disclosed by the peer group company to have a material impact on their executive compensation levels, the specific compensation element is excluded from the competitive data and associated analysis as determined by Mercer.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DECISIONS FOR 2024

Pay Mix

The following graph sets forth the key components of compensation and pay mix for the Named Executive Officers based on target payout levels for 2024:

Base Salary

In setting base salary for an executive, the Compensation Committee uses an average of the median of the base salaries paid by peer group companies and the published general industry survey data as the general reference point because it believes that average is a reasonable and appropriate representation of competitive base salary levels in the market for similar roles and talent. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to adjust the base salary above or below the market average as it deems appropriate. Reasons for making such adjustments can include tenure of the executive in the position, job performance, additional responsibilities of the executive, executive retention and succession planning. The Compensation Committee generally increases base salaries as of January 1st each year, based on a market analysis provided by Mercer.

Each of the Named Executive Officers received a 4% increase in base salary effective on January 1, 2024. The 4% increase was set by the Compensation Committee following a recommendation of Mercer based on their analysis of base salaries paid by peer group companies and in general industry.

Mr. Batteh’s base salary for 2024 in connection with his promotion to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer was set at $435,000, which is approximately at the 25th percentile of average base salaries paid to chief financial officers of peer group companies and in general industry.

Annual Cash Incentives

Annual cash incentive awards are used to reward executives for achievement of corporate annual operating income and operating ratio targets for the year. The annual cash incentive awards provide for threshold, target and maximum payouts as a percentage of base salary for each executive. The Committee elected not to change this methodology used in the annual incentive plan for 2024.

In setting an executive’s target annual incentive percentage, the Compensation Committee uses an average of the median of annual cash incentive targets of the peer group companies and the published industry surveys as the general reference point because it believes that average is a reasonable and appropriate representation of competitive annual cash incentive

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

levels in the market for similar roles and talent. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to adjust the target percentage above or below the market average as it deems appropriate. Reasons for making such adjustment can include tenure of the executive in the position, job performance, additional responsibilities of the executive, internal pay equity, executive retention and succession planning.

For 2024, if the Company achieves its maximum performance target under the plan, the executive receives 200% of his or her target, at target corporate performance, the executive receives 100% of his or her target and at threshold corporate performance, the executive receives 25% of his or her target. No incentive is earned if corporate performance is below threshold.

There were no changes to the annual incentive target percentages for the Named Executive Officers for 2024, except as follows:

Consistent with the goal of maintaining a broad talent slate for those interviewing for management level positions at Saia, the annual incentive plan for 2024 provides that if interview pools during the year for 90% or more of open positions for director-level employee positions and above do not have at least one diverse candidate, the annual incentive payouts for the Named Executive Officers (and other direct reports to the CEO) for the year is reduced by ten percentage points.

Potential Payouts of Annual Cash Incentives for 2024

For 2024 the potential payouts under the annual incentive awards for the Named Executive Officers were as follows:

Corporate Performance Targets and Actual Performance for 2024

For 2024, the annual cash incentive awards for the Named Executive Officers were based 50% on achieving an annual operating income target and 50% on achieving an annual operating ratio target. The Compensation Committee believes using an operating income target rather than an earnings per share target more closely reflects actual performance of management for the year by eliminating the impact of changes to the effective tax rate. Saia uses operating ratio as a performance metric because it is an objective measure of profitability of Saia’s business, is a common measure of profitability within the industry and can have a direct impact on Saia’s stock price. Operating ratio is defined as operating expenses divided by operating revenue. Real estate gains and losses, one-time charges and integration charges are excluded from the calculation at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Operating income and operating ratio targets for 2024 were set by the Compensation Committee considering past performance, the strategic plan, current economic conditions and other forecasts of performance for the year. The performance targets and actual performance for 2024 were as follows:

Based on actual operating income and operating ratio results for 2024, there was no payment under the annual incentive plan to the Named Executive Officers for 2024. See the “2024 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” for additional information about annual incentive awards for the Named Executive Officers for 2024.

Long-Term Equity Incentives

The Compensation Committee provides long-term equity awards to the executive officers in the form of performance stock units and restricted stock to align the interests of the executives with the interests of our stockholders, reward executives for stock appreciation over a multi-year period and for executive retention. The Compensation Committee elected not to change the methodology used in determining long-term equity awards for 2024.

Long-term equity awards are typically granted in early February each year after the third trading day following the release of the Company’s financial results for the prior fiscal year. For new hires receiving equity grants, the grant date is typically on or around their hire date. The Company believes that the disclosure of material non-public information should not be manipulated for the purpose of enriching compensation awards. We do not time the release of public information to affect the value of equity-based awards, and we do not time the grant of equity-based awards to take advantage of the disclosure of information. The Company did not grant stock options or stock appreciation rights in 2024.

Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan Targets

The Committee grants long-term equity awards to each Named Executive Officer based on a target percentage of the executive’s base salary. In setting an executive’s target percentage, the Compensation Committee uses an average of the median of the long-term equity incentive targets of the peer group companies and the published industry surveys as the general reference point because it believes that average is a reasonable and appropriate representation of competitive long-term equity incentive levels in the market for similar roles and talent. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to adjust the target percentage above or below the market average as it deems appropriate. Reasons for making such adjustment include tenure of the executive in the position, job performance, additional responsibilities of the executive, executive retention and succession planning.

There were no changes to the long-term equity plan target percentages for the Named Executive Officers for 2024, except as follows:

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

For 2024, the target long-term equity plan percentages for the Named Executive Officers were as follows:

Components of Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards

For 2024, 50% of a Named Executive Officer’s long-term equity incentive opportunity was granted in performance stock units and 50% in restricted stock.

Performance Stock Units

For 2024, 50% of the Named Executive Officers’ long-term equity incentive opportunity was awarded in performance stock units, which are paid in shares of Saia common stock to the extent earned. The role of performance stock units is to reward executives for long-term value creation relative to other publicly traded transportation companies. The Compensation Committee believes that measuring Saia stock performance against that of a broad group of transportation companies over a multi-year period provides a key metric for assessing the long-term performance of Saia’s Named Executive Officers. Providing a significant portion of long-term compensation on this basis also aligns the interests of the Named Executive Officers with the interests of our stockholders and helps insure against executives taking excessive or unnecessary risks that might threaten the long-term value of the Company.

The number of shares of stock that are earned by a participant is based on the total stockholder return of Saia compared to the total stockholder return (assuming reinvestment of dividends) of the companies in the broader transportation group over a three-year performance period. At the end of the performance period, the percentile rank of the Company’s total stockholder return is calculated relative to the total stockholder return of each of the companies in the group. Because the performance period for each grant of performance stock units is three years, participants can have overlapping three-year award opportunities at any time.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Since the size of the companies is not critical in assessing relative total stockholder returns, the companies selected by the Compensation Committee for comparison purposes (the “PSU Group”) are U.S. publicly traded companies in the broader transportation industry, regardless of revenues. The Committee believes using performance of the companies in the PSU Group provides a wider spectrum from which to assess management performance. The companies included in the PSU Group for 2024 grants were as follows:

The payout percentage of target is determined as follows:

Payouts are interpolated for performance between the 25th and 50th percentiles and the 50th and 75th percentiles.

If the Company’s total stockholder return for the three-year performance period is negative, any payouts are reduced by one-half. Given the cyclical nature of the transportation industry, the Compensation Committee includes this provision to provide an incentive under the plan to reward performance relative to peers in the case of an economic downturn affecting the entire industry, to conform to peer group practice generally and for executive retention.

The following table details the payout percentages compared to target of the performance stock units paid out the last three years:

In February 2024, the Company granted a total of 6,597 shares (at target) for the 2024 to 2026 performance period to the Named Executive Officers, representing 76% of the total target units granted at that time. See the “2024 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” for additional information about the specific performance stock units granted to each of the Named Executive Officers in 2024.

See the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” for a description of the effect a termination of employment or a change in control of the Company would have on the performance stock units awarded to the Named Executive Officers.

Restricted Stock Awards

The Committee uses restricted stock as a part of the long-term equity incentive plan to help reduce significant executive compensation swings that can occur because of the cyclical nature of the trucking business, for executive retention and

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

to better align the Company’s long-term compensation practices with its peers. The value of restricted stock grants in 2024 under the long-term equity incentive plan was equal to 50% of the target long-term equity incentive award for the executive. In February 2024, the Company granted a total of 6,597 shares of restricted stock to the Named Executive Officers, representing 76% of the total restricted stock awards granted at that time. These restricted stock grants vest ratably over three years subject to earlier vesting upon death, disability, retirement, and a change in control of Saia.

The Company also uses restricted stock grants from time to time for executive retention, as part of a total compensation package granted to an executive upon initial hiring or to recognize the significant promotion of an executive or outstanding performance. These restricted stock grants have historically vested over a five-year period to promote executive retention. In connection with his promotion to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Batteh received a grant of 1,364 shares of restricted stock on May 13, 2024 with an initial valuation of $550,000. These shares vest as follows: 25% on May 13, 2027; 25% on May 13, 2028 and the balance on May 13, 2029, subject to earlier vesting based on certain events.

See the “2024 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” for additional information on restricted stock grants made to each of the Named Executive Officers in 2024. See the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” for a description of the effect a termination of employment or a change in control of the Company would have on the restricted stock granted to the Named Executive Officers.

Other Benefits and Perquisites

Customary Benefits

The Company provides customary employee benefits to substantially all employees, including the Named Executive Officers. These benefits include paid holidays and vacation, medical, disability and life insurance and a defined contribution retirement plan. The defined contribution retirement plan is a 401(k) savings plan to which employees may elect to make pre-tax contributions. The Company has the discretion to match 50% of all employee contributions, up to a maximum employee contribution of 6% of annual salary.

Deferred Compensation Plan

The Company has established for officers (including all of the Named Executive Officers) and certain other employees a Capital Accumulation Plan, which is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan. The Capital Accumulation Plan was implemented to motivate and retain key employees by providing them with greater flexibility in structuring the timing of their compensation and tax payments. The Compensation Committee believes that the Capital Accumulation Plan provides a valuable benefit to senior executives with minimal cost to the Company.

The Capital Accumulation Plan allows a participant to make an elective deferral each year of up to 50% of base salary and up to 100% of any annual incentive plan payment. The Company typically makes an annual discretionary contribution under the Capital Accumulation Plan for each participant equal to 5% of his or her base salary and annual incentive payment, which contribution is subject to a five-year vesting period. In addition, to the extent a participant’s contribution to the 401(k) savings plan is limited under restrictions placed on “Highly Compensated Employees” under ERISA, the participant may elect to contribute the amount so limited to the Capital Accumulation Plan. To the extent the Company is unable to match participant contributions under the 401(k) savings plan because of the ERISA limitations, the matching contributions will be made by the Company to the Capital Accumulation Plan.

The Capital Accumulation Plan provides the same investment options to participants as are available under the 401(k) savings plan, except that participants may also elect to invest in Saia common stock under the Capital Accumulation Plan. Participants may elect to transfer balances between investment options without restriction at any time throughout the year, except that any investment in Saia stock is an irrevocable election and upon distribution that investment will be paid out in Saia stock, rather than cash. Vested plan balances become distributable to the participant upon termination of employment subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions made under the Capital Accumulation Plan for the Named Executive Officers for 2024 are set forth in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table and in the 2024 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Perquisites

The types and amounts of perquisites provided to the Named Executive Officers are determined by the Compensation Committee with input from Mercer based on perquisites granted to comparable officers by companies in the executive compensation peer group. The Company provides perquisites because many companies in the peer group provide similar perquisites to their Named Executive Officers and because the Committee believes they are important for executive retention. The value of the perquisites provided to the Named Executive Officers for 2024 are set forth in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

Post-Employment Compensation

Severance Agreements

Each of the Named Executive Officers is subject to non-competition and employee and customer non-solicitation provisions, as well as provisions designed to protect Saia’s intellectual property. In connection with the restrictive covenants, the Company entered into a severance agreement with each Named Executive Officer (other than the Chief Executive Officer) that generally provides for severance payments equal to base salary over the non-compete period in the event the executive’s employment is involuntarily terminated without cause as defined in the agreements. To receive the severance payments, the executive must sign a general release of claims against the Company and must comply with the executive’s obligations under any other agreement with the Company, including the restrictive covenants. Mr. Holzgrefe’s severance arrangements are governed by the terms of his employment agreement and Change in Control Agreement (referred to below).

Double Trigger Change in Control Agreements

The Company has change in control agreements with each of the Named Executive Officers (the “Change in Control Agreements”). The Compensation Committee believes the Change in Control Agreements are an important part of Saia’s overall compensation program for the Named Executive Officers because they help secure the continued employment and dedication of the Named Executive Officers notwithstanding any concern the executive might have regarding their own continued employment in the event of a potential change in control transaction.

The Change in Control Agreements include a “double trigger,” meaning they provide for severance payments and other benefits only if there is a change in control of the Company and only if after the change in control the executive’s employment is terminated involuntarily (other than for cause) or voluntarily with good reason within two years after the change in control. The Change in Control Agreements are reviewed periodically by the Committee to ensure they are consistent with the Company’s compensation philosophy. The Committee also receives input from Mercer and outside legal counsel to confirm that the agreements remain generally consistent with competitive practices.

The amount of the severance payments and benefits under these agreements are based on peer group and general industry practices and are described in the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” section of this proxy statement.

Employment Agreement

To promote executive retention, continuity and stability in the Company’s leadership and help support certain non-competition and non-solicitation provisions, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Holzgrefe at the time he was named Chief Executive Officer in April 2020. The employment agreement is for a two-year initial term (renewing daily) and provides for a minimum base salary that is to be reviewed annually, participation in the Company’s annual and long-term incentive plans, other benefits that are provided to senior executives of Saia and severance benefits in the event of Mr. Holzgrefe’s employment termination under certain circumstances. All severance benefits under the employment agreement are conditioned upon Mr. Holzgrefe’s compliance with the non-disclosure, non-competition and employee and customer non-solicitation provisions of the employment agreement. The material terms of the employment agreement are reviewed periodically by the Committee with input from Mercer and outside legal counsel to confirm that they remain generally consistent with competitive practices. The payments to be made to Mr. Holzgrefe under his employment agreement upon termination of employment or a change in control of the Company are described in the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” section of this proxy statement.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Risk Assessment in Compensation Programs

The Compensation Committee regularly assesses the Company’s executive and broad-based compensation and benefits programs, policies and practices to determine if they create undesired or unintended risk of a material nature. Although the Committee reviews all executive compensation programs, it focuses on those programs with variability of payout, and reviews the ability of a participant to directly affect payout, the controls on participant action and actual payouts.

Based on that assessment, the Compensation Committee concluded that the Company’s compensation programs are designed and administered with an appropriate balance of risk and reward in relation to the Company’s business strategy and do not encourage executives to take unnecessary or excessive risks. The following features of the compensation programs help to mitigate risk taking:

Other Compensation Policies

Stock Ownership Guidelines

Because the Company is committed to aligning the executives’ interests with those of Saia stockholders, the Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines for all officers who are eligible to receive long-term incentives, including all of the Named Executive Officers. The number of shares each officer is required to retain is determined by multiplying his or her current base salary by the multiple noted below and dividing by the current share price, rounded down to the nearest dollar. The current guidelines for the Named Executive Officers are as follows:

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Executives are to satisfy the guidelines within five years of becoming subject to the guidelines. Until the guidelines are met, executives are encouraged to hold 75% of the realized share value (net of taxes) attributable to option exercises, performance stock unit payouts and vesting in restricted stock. The Compensation Committee monitors the progress toward, and continued compliance with, the stock ownership guidelines on a regular basis. The types of equity counted for purposes of the stock ownership guidelines are common stock, including restricted stock, and Company stock units held in the deferred compensation plan. Performance stock units are not counted for purposes of the guidelines.

Although there are no formal penalties for not fulfilling the requirements of the ownership guidelines, non-compliance may affect future equity awards. The foregoing sets forth the Company’s current ownership guidelines for executives. The Board (or any committee designated by the Board) may, at any time, amend, modify or terminate the guidelines in full or in part. The Board (or any committee designated by the Board) may also grant waivers of the guidelines in the event of special circumstances or as otherwise determined advisable or in the best interest of the Company in given circumstances.

Prohibition Against Short Sales, Hedging and Margin Accounts

Under the Company’s insider trading policy, Saia employees, including the Named Executive Officers, and Saia directors, are prohibited from engaging in short sales of Saia common stock or in transactions involving puts, calls, or other derivative securities or in hedging transactions (such as zero-cost collars and forward sale contracts) with respect to the Company’s stock. Additionally, such employees, including the Named Executive Officers, and directors are prohibited from holding Saia stock in a margin account and from pledging Saia common stock as collateral for indebtedness.

Clawback Policies

The Board of Directors has adopted a Clawback Policy that complies with Nasdaq listing standards, which obligates the Company to demand recovery of certain excess incentive compensation awarded to certain current and former executive officers if the result of a performance measure upon which the award was based is subsequently restated or otherwise adjusted in a manner that would reduce the size of the award.

In addition, the Company also maintains an Incentive Compensation Recovery Policy applicable to all current and former officers, senior managers and executives who participate in Saia’s incentive compensation plans and programs providing that if such individual engages in “Improper Conduct” (as defined under the Incentive Compensation Recovery Policy) or if the result of a performance measure upon which incentive compensation was based is subsequently restated or otherwise adjusted in a manner that would reduce the size of the award, Saia may, within three years following the payment or vesting of incentive compensation, seek recovery of such incentive compensation. In such instance, in accordance with the Incentive Compensation Recovery Policy, the Company may also cancel any unpaid or unvested incentive compensation. The Compensation Committee has discretion under the Incentive Compensation Recovery Policy to determine whether to seek recovery in a given situation based on a number of factors, including an assessment of the relative costs and benefits of seeking the recovery, whether seeking the recovery may violate applicable law or otherwise prejudice Saia’s interests, and such other factors as it deems relevant.

Tax Policies

Historically, the Compensation Committee structured annual and long-term incentives with the intention of satisfying the performance-based exemption from Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code in order to deduct for tax purposes compensation paid to certain executive officers in excess of $1 million. The Federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, repealed the exemption from Section 162(m)’s deduction limit for performance-based compensation, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. As a result, compensation granted or paid in 2018 or thereafter to the Named Executive Officers may not be fully deductible for income tax purposes.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

In establishing the compensation for executive officers, the Compensation Committee believes that the potential deductibility of the compensation should be only one of a number of relevant factors taken into consideration, and not the sole or primary factor. The Committee believes that executive compensation must be maintained at the requisite level to attract and retain the executive officers essential to Saia’s financial success and, as a result, retains the flexibility to award compensation that it determines to be consistent with the goals of our executive compensation program even if the compensation is not deductible by Saia for tax purposes.

Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code regulates deferred compensation that was not earned and vested prior to 2005. The Committee considers Section 409A in determining the form and timing of compensation paid to executives.

Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code limit Saia’s ability to take a tax deduction for certain “excess parachute payments” (as defined in Code Sections 280G and 4999) and impose excise taxes on each executive that receives “excess parachute payments” related to his or her severance from the Company in connection with a change in control. The Committee considers the adverse tax liabilities imposed by Code Sections 280G and 4999, as well as other competitive factors, in structuring certain post-termination compensation payable to the Named Executive Officers. The potential adverse tax consequences to the Company and/or the executive, however, are not necessarily determinative factors in such decisions.

Accounting Policies

The Company accounts for its employee stock-based compensation awards in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation. ASC Topic 718 requires that all employee stock-based compensation is recognized as a cost in the financial statements and that for equity-classified awards such costs are measured at the grant date fair value of the award.

Compensation Committee Report of Saia, Inc.

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has submitted the following report for inclusion in this Proxy Statement:

Our Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement with management. Based on the Committee’s review of and the discussions with management with respect to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and in this Proxy Statement.

The foregoing report is provided by the following directors, who constitute the Committee:

Compensation and Human Capital Committee Members

Di-Ann Eisnor, Chair

John P. Gainor

Kevin A. Henry

Randolph W. Melville

Jeffrey C. Ward

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to the Named Executive Officers for services rendered in all capacities within Saia during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Summary Compensation Table Narrative

Employment Agreement

The Company is a party to an employment agreement with Mr. Holzgrefe, dated April 28, 2020, that was entered into at the time he became Chief Executive Officer. The employment agreement is for a two-year initial term (renewing daily) and provides for a base salary that is to be reviewed annually, with the amount of such base salary not to decrease from the rate then in effect without Mr. Holzgrefe’s consent. The agreement also provides that Mr. Holzgrefe is to participate in the Company’s annual bonus plan, long-term incentive award plan and other benefits that are or may become available to senior executives of Saia. Mr. Holzgrefe’s agreement includes non-competition and customer and employee non-solicitation provisions that continue during the term of Mr. Holzgrefe’s employment and until two years after the date he ceases to be employed by the Company. The agreement also includes provisions designed to protect the intellectual property of Saia. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control — Employment Agreement — Frederick J. Holzgrefe, III” for additional information concerning benefits available upon termination of employment or a change in control of the Company.

Stock Awards

Stock Awards are comprised of performance stock units and restricted stock. Participants receiving performance stock units are eligible to receive shares of common stock based on the total stockholder return of Saia compared to the total stockholder return of a peer group of companies over a three-year performance period. The number of shares of common stock that can be received ranges from zero to 200% of the target shares. Shares of restricted stock typically vest over three to five years. See “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” for information regarding performance stock units and restricted stock granted in 2024. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information concerning performance stock units and restricted stock. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” for information concerning the effect of a termination of employment or a change in control of the Company on stock awards.

Option Awards

The exercise price of stock options is the last sale price of Saia stock on Nasdaq on the grant date. Options vest one-third each year on the anniversary of the grant date and expire seven years after their grant date. There were no stock options granted in 2024. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” for information concerning the effect of a termination of employment or a change in control of the Company on stock options.

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation

Amounts shown in this column represent amounts earned under the Company’s annual cash incentive plan. The plan provides for cash payments to participants based 50% on achieving the Company’s annual operating income target for the year and 50% on achieving the Company’s operating ratio target for the year. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information concerning the annual cash incentive plan. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” for information concerning the effect of a termination of employment on annual cash incentives.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth the detail of grants of plan-based awards to Saia’s Named Executive Officers for services rendered in all capacities during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.

2024 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE