SEATTLE, Oct.14 , 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Recent
Zillow® research shows Hispanic homeowners making strides in
narrowing the home value gap with white homeowners over the past
two years, regaining ground lost during the pandemic. The gap is
now the narrowest ever observed.
Hispanic-owned homes are currently worth 11.9% less than homes
owned by non-Hispanic white households, down from 12.1% last year
and a recent high of 12.4% in December
2021. The gap was as wide as 18% in 2012, following the
global financial crisis of 2007–2009, when many minority
communities were hit especially hard, setting back progress by
several years. The slow climb back continued steadily until
interrupted in 2021, but the course has now been corrected.
"Homeownership stands as a cornerstone for building wealth, yet
systemic barriers have unfairly hindered many people of color from
acquiring homes valued comparably to those of their white
counterparts," said Treh Manhertz, Zillow senior economic research
scientist. "Efforts to improve access to down payment assistance,
credit-building programs, zoning reforms, and affordable housing
construction and preservation in desirable areas are key
initiatives to help this progress continue."
More of Hispanic homeowners' wealth is typically tied up in
their primary residence, relative to homeowners of other races, so
home value fluctuations have an outsize effect on them. There is
positive movement toward equity at the local level. More than
two-thirds of the 100 largest metro areas saw the home value gap
decrease for Hispanic homeowners over the past year. For example,
significant reductions were observed in several large Florida markets, including Miami, Orlando and Tampa.
Several metros with larger-than-average Hispanic/white home
value gaps also saw their gaps narrow. Of the 40 largest metros
with gaps larger than the national average, 31 of them reduced
their gap by more than the national average. Los Angeles has the largest home value gap,
with 32% lower home values for Hispanic residents compared to white
residents. The gap in that metro shrunk by 0.75 percentage points
in the past year.
However, while gradual progress is being made in closing the
gap, the jump into homeownership remains a significant hurdle for
Hispanics. According to Zillow's 2024 Consumer Housing Trends
Report, Hispanics represent 18% of prospective buyers, but 13% of
successful purchasers. Data from the Homeowners Mortgage Disclosure
Act shows that Hispanics face higher fees when purchasing a home,
averaging $2,812 compared to the
national average of $2,072. Mortgage
denial rates are also notably higher for Hispanic borrowers, with
18.8% experiencing denials compared to 10% for non-Hispanic whites,
often due to elevated debt-to-income ratios, which account for 38%
of denials.
Zillow's analysis indicates that the home value gap for Black
homeowners has slightly narrowed over the past year as well, to
17.7% from 17.9%. However, the gap remains wider compared to
mid-2022 (17.2%) and mid-2007, shortly before the housing bust
(16.3%).
Typical Home Values
by Race and Ethnicity (National)
|
Race
|
Typical Home
Value (based
on Zillow Home
Value Index)
|
Year-Over-Year
Change in Typical
Home Value (%)
|
Home Value Gap,
Relative to White
Home Values (%)
|
One-Year Change
in Home Value Gap
(Percentage Points)
|
Five-Year Change in
Home Value Gap
(Percentage Points)
|
All
|
$362,143
|
2.51 %
|
-2.9 %
|
0.05pp
|
0.27pp
|
Asian
|
$379,919
|
2.65 %
|
1.9 %
|
0.19pp
|
-0.09pp
|
Black
|
$306,928
|
2.69 %
|
-17.7 %
|
0.19pp
|
1.67pp
|
Hispanic
|
$328,283
|
2.62 %
|
-11.9 %
|
0.14pp
|
0.83pp
|
Pacific
Islander
|
$350,176
|
2.58 %
|
-6.1 %
|
.011pp
|
0.91pp
|
White
(non-Hispanic)
|
$372,835
|
2.46 %
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
Hispanic Home Value Gaps Relative to White Home
Values by Metro
|
Region
|
Size
Rank
|
Typical Home Value
(Based on Zillow
Home Value Index)
|
Year-Over-Year
Change in Typical
Home Value (%)
|
Home Value Gap,
Relative to White
Home Values (%)
|
One-Year Change in
Home Value Gap
(Percentage Points)
|
Five-Year Change in
Home Value Gap
(Percentage Points)
|
United
States
|
0
|
$328,283
|
2.6 %
|
-11.9 %
|
0.14
|
0.83
|
New York, NY
|
1
|
$616,961
|
7.0 %
|
-11.8 %
|
0.00
|
3.12
|
Los Angeles,
CA
|
2
|
$757,081
|
6.2 %
|
-32.0 %
|
0.75
|
1.26
|
Chicago, IL
|
3
|
$277,784
|
5.8 %
|
-21.1 %
|
0.73
|
2.97
|
Dallas, TX
|
4
|
$308,407
|
-0.5 %
|
-23.8 %
|
-0.21
|
0.48
|
Houston, TX
|
5
|
$262,205
|
0.2 %
|
-23.4 %
|
-0.37
|
0.93
|
Washington,
DC
|
6
|
$530,240
|
3.2 %
|
-9.8 %
|
-0.05
|
-0.26
|
Philadelphia,
PA
|
7
|
$306,432
|
5.6 %
|
-21.0 %
|
0.73
|
2.90
|
Miami, FL
|
8
|
$481,455
|
4.5 %
|
-8.2 %
|
1.11
|
0.73
|
Atlanta, GA
|
9
|
$367,869
|
2.1 %
|
-9.8 %
|
-0.17
|
1.40
|
Boston, MA
|
10
|
$612,730
|
6.2 %
|
-13.7 %
|
0.55
|
1.79
|
Phoenix, AZ
|
11
|
$382,548
|
1.3 %
|
-20.3 %
|
0.16
|
1.47
|
San Francisco,
CA
|
12
|
$933,036
|
2.4 %
|
-23.1 %
|
0.25
|
-0.57
|
Riverside,
CA
|
13
|
$555,505
|
5.0 %
|
-6.1 %
|
1.07
|
0.78
|
Detroit, MI
|
14
|
$214,780
|
4.1 %
|
-21.1 %
|
0.16
|
1.59
|
Seattle, WA
|
15
|
$672,295
|
3.8 %
|
-9.4 %
|
-0.25
|
0.21
|
Minneapolis,
MN
|
16
|
$345,525
|
-0.1 %
|
-9.0 %
|
-0.13
|
-0.75
|
San Diego,
CA
|
17
|
$789,845
|
6.0 %
|
-20.8 %
|
-0.01
|
-1.37
|
Tampa, FL
|
18
|
$361,364
|
0.7 %
|
-6.0 %
|
0.47
|
1.24
|
Denver, CO
|
19
|
$534,266
|
0.3 %
|
-10.2 %
|
-0.06
|
0.39
|
Baltimore,
MD
|
20
|
$361,431
|
2.2 %
|
-10.0 %
|
-0.04
|
0.60
|
St. Louis,
MO
|
21
|
$237,436
|
3.2 %
|
-10.0 %
|
0.26
|
0.07
|
Orlando, FL
|
22
|
$382,635
|
1.6 %
|
-6.5 %
|
0.28
|
0.84
|
Charlotte,
NC
|
23
|
$354,059
|
2.3 %
|
-10.6 %
|
-0.38
|
1.16
|
San Antonio,
TX
|
24
|
$253,056
|
-3.3 %
|
-20.0 %
|
-0.58
|
-2.22
|
Portland, OR
|
25
|
$522,869
|
0.4 %
|
-4.8 %
|
0.05
|
0.36
|
Sacramento,
CA
|
26
|
$545,042
|
1.9 %
|
-6.7 %
|
0.07
|
1.07
|
Pittsburgh,
PA
|
27
|
$212,743
|
2.9 %
|
-1.8 %
|
0.30
|
0.52
|
Cincinnati,
OH
|
28
|
$288,459
|
3.9 %
|
-0.4 %
|
0.18
|
0.76
|
Austin, TX
|
29
|
$386,620
|
-4.7 %
|
-20.0 %
|
-0.12
|
-0.20
|
Las Vegas,
NV
|
30
|
$394,817
|
6.3 %
|
-11.8 %
|
0.15
|
1.22
|
Kansas City,
MO
|
31
|
$259,774
|
3.1 %
|
-16.9 %
|
0.56
|
4.92
|
Columbus, OH
|
32
|
$301,314
|
3.8 %
|
-6.1 %
|
0.29
|
1.79
|
Indianapolis,
IN
|
34
|
$257,310
|
2.8 %
|
-9.3 %
|
0.33
|
2.87
|
Cleveland,
OH
|
35
|
$197,351
|
6.3 %
|
-19.7 %
|
0.60
|
1.82
|
San Jose, CA
|
36
|
$1,205,284
|
8.3 %
|
-29.5 %
|
-0.19
|
--
|
Nashville,
TN
|
37
|
$410,933
|
1.2 %
|
-8.4 %
|
-0.08
|
-0.34
|
Virginia Beach,
VA
|
38
|
$340,167
|
4.1 %
|
-5.6 %
|
-0.02
|
0.41
|
Providence,
RI
|
39
|
$443,424
|
7.7 %
|
-10.6 %
|
0.61
|
3.17
|
Jacksonville,
FL
|
40
|
$351,709
|
0.0 %
|
-5.3 %
|
-0.16
|
-0.20
|
Milwaukee,
WI
|
41
|
$302,557
|
6.4 %
|
-16.5 %
|
1.33
|
3.78
|
Oklahoma City,
OK
|
42
|
$188,978
|
2.9 %
|
-22.4 %
|
0.92
|
2.31
|
Raleigh, NC
|
43
|
$399,795
|
0.8 %
|
-12.1 %
|
-0.55
|
0.20
|
Memphis, TN
|
44
|
$206,021
|
0.1 %
|
-24.5 %
|
0.18
|
2.20
|
Richmond, VA
|
45
|
$354,300
|
3.6 %
|
-8.1 %
|
-0.95
|
1.93
|
Louisville,
KY
|
46
|
$239,268
|
3.6 %
|
-10.2 %
|
0.62
|
1.26
|
New Orleans,
LA
|
47
|
$227,884
|
-4.9 %
|
-10.5 %
|
-0.09
|
-0.38
|
Salt Lake City,
UT
|
48
|
$474,847
|
1.4 %
|
-14.3 %
|
0.38
|
1.57
|
Hartford, CT
|
49
|
$320,684
|
8.2 %
|
-15.1 %
|
0.22
|
2.69
|
Buffalo, NY
|
50
|
$234,885
|
5.9 %
|
-15.5 %
|
0.28
|
0.43
|
Birmingham,
AL
|
51
|
$214,607
|
-1.1 %
|
-23.6 %
|
-0.21
|
0.86
|
Rochester,
NY
|
52
|
$212,113
|
8.5 %
|
-20.5 %
|
1.19
|
0.88
|
Grand Rapids,
MI
|
53
|
$296,116
|
4.3 %
|
-10.1 %
|
0.07
|
1.77
|
Tucson, AZ
|
54
|
$306,415
|
2.4 %
|
-17.3 %
|
0.29
|
1.48
|
Urban Honolulu,
HI
|
55
|
$837,579
|
0.2 %
|
-9.4 %
|
0.11
|
1.60
|
Tulsa, OK
|
56
|
$203,248
|
5.1 %
|
-16.6 %
|
0.91
|
4.17
|
Fresno, CA
|
57
|
$361,363
|
3.7 %
|
-14.8 %
|
0.44
|
1.77
|
Worcester,
MA
|
58
|
$417,878
|
6.7 %
|
-9.3 %
|
0.20
|
1.97
|
Omaha, NE
|
59
|
$235,734
|
2.5 %
|
-20.6 %
|
0.34
|
2.91
|
Bridgeport,
CT
|
60
|
$476,062
|
7.1 %
|
-28.9 %
|
0.29
|
1.01
|
Greenville,
SC
|
61
|
$282,466
|
2.6 %
|
-5.1 %
|
0.08
|
0.50
|
Albuquerque,
NM
|
62
|
$317,233
|
3.8 %
|
-10.4 %
|
0.37
|
2.49
|
Bakersfield,
CA
|
63
|
$341,373
|
5.4 %
|
-6.7 %
|
0.88
|
3.11
|
Albany, NY
|
64
|
$326,272
|
6.0 %
|
-3.7 %
|
0.09
|
0.31
|
Knoxville,
TN
|
65
|
$334,875
|
4.8 %
|
-3.6 %
|
0.13
|
0.40
|
Baton Rouge,
LA
|
66
|
$237,438
|
1.1 %
|
-4.5 %
|
-0.03
|
-0.56
|
McAllen, TX
|
67
|
$185,676
|
4.1 %
|
-2.5 %
|
0.49
|
1.74
|
New Haven,
CT
|
68
|
$312,071
|
8.8 %
|
-20.4 %
|
1.07
|
4.72
|
El Paso, TX
|
69
|
$214,898
|
3.4 %
|
-11.0 %
|
-0.06
|
-0.12
|
Allentown,
PA
|
70
|
$298,125
|
6.1 %
|
-12.6 %
|
0.51
|
3.49
|
Oxnard, CA
|
71
|
$781,421
|
5.2 %
|
-13.9 %
|
0.64
|
0.78
|
Columbia, SC
|
72
|
$241,786
|
3.2 %
|
-6.6 %
|
0.03
|
0.12
|
North Port,
FL
|
73
|
$386,768
|
-3.8 %
|
-14.1 %
|
0.23
|
0.76
|
Dayton, OH
|
74
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
Charleston,
SC
|
75
|
$429,839
|
4.0 %
|
-6.0 %
|
-0.14
|
-0.09
|
Greensboro,
NC
|
76
|
$238,007
|
3.9 %
|
-11.1 %
|
0.48
|
0.82
|
Stockton, CA
|
77
|
$493,040
|
2.3 %
|
-9.7 %
|
0.18
|
1.43
|
Cape Coral,
FL
|
78
|
$343,382
|
-3.3 %
|
-13.2 %
|
1.59
|
4.27
|
Boise City,
ID
|
79
|
$464,466
|
2.8 %
|
-2.8 %
|
0.07
|
0.25
|
Colorado Springs,
CO
|
80
|
$409,478
|
0.0 %
|
-12.5 %
|
-0.32
|
0.32
|
Little Rock,
AR
|
81
|
$185,896
|
4.1 %
|
-20.1 %
|
0.61
|
-0.95
|
Lakeland, FL
|
82
|
$315,409
|
-0.8 %
|
0.2 %
|
-0.45
|
-0.86
|
Akron, OH
|
83
|
$197,938
|
6.9 %
|
-12.2 %
|
1.23
|
2.93
|
Des Moines,
IA
|
84
|
$234,000
|
3.8 %
|
-18.2 %
|
0.92
|
2.30
|
Springfield,
MA
|
85
|
$321,597
|
6.5 %
|
-11.5 %
|
0.75
|
4.91
|
Poughkeepsie,
NY
|
86
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
Ogden, UT
|
87
|
$469,761
|
1.3 %
|
-5.6 %
|
0.03
|
0.28
|
Madison, WI
|
88
|
$404,765
|
5.4 %
|
-2.2 %
|
0.15
|
1.05
|
Winston, NC
|
89
|
$251,975
|
4.7 %
|
-8.4 %
|
0.43
|
1.60
|
Deltona, FL
|
90
|
$328,665
|
0.7 %
|
-6.2 %
|
1.42
|
2.43
|
Syracuse, NY
|
91
|
$216,714
|
10.6 %
|
-11.2 %
|
0.47
|
0.70
|
Provo, UT
|
92
|
$492,017
|
0.2 %
|
-7.0 %
|
-0.11
|
0.21
|
Toledo, OH
|
93
|
$172,244
|
5.1 %
|
-11.7 %
|
0.69
|
2.66
|
Wichita, KS
|
94
|
$181,120
|
7.0 %
|
-18.7 %
|
1.02
|
4.03
|
Durham, NC
|
95
|
$392,000
|
1.9 %
|
-6.1 %
|
-0.15
|
0.19
|
Augusta, GA
|
96
|
$229,761
|
2.1 %
|
-2.6 %
|
-0.41
|
-4.60
|
Palm Bay, FL
|
97
|
$344,506
|
-1.0 %
|
-4.3 %
|
-0.03
|
0.35
|
Jackson, MS
|
98
|
$208,466
|
-0.6 %
|
0.2 %
|
0.02
|
0.65
|
Harrisburg,
PA
|
99
|
$252,998
|
4.3 %
|
-12.1 %
|
0.87
|
3.18
|
Spokane, WA
|
100
|
$390,956
|
0.4 %
|
-5.7 %
|
0.02
|
0.43
|
Methodology: Zillow's analysis aggregated
small-area home values (ZHVI), weighted by estimated counts of
homeowners by race and ethnicity of the household head in the
American Community Survey, to estimate relative home values and
home value appreciation by race.
About Zillow Group:
Zillow Group, Inc. (Nasdaq:
Z and ZG) is reimagining real estate to make home a reality for
more and more people. As the most visited real estate website in
the United States, Zillow and its
affiliates help people find and get the home they want by
connecting them with digital solutions, dedicated partners and
agents, and easier buying, selling, financing and renting
experiences.
Zillow Group's affiliates, subsidiaries and brands include
Zillow®, Zillow Premier Agent®, Zillow Home Loans℠, Zillow
Rentals®, Trulia®, Out East®, StreetEasy®, HotPads®, ShowingTime+℠,
Spruce® and Follow Up Boss®.
All marks herein are owned by MFTB Holdco, Inc., a Zillow
affiliate. Zillow Home Loans, LLC is an Equal Housing Lender, NMLS
#10287 (www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org). © 2024 MFTB Holdco, Inc., a
Zillow affiliate.
View original content to download
multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/hispanic-homeowners-narrow-home-value-gap-to-smallest-margin-on-record-302274905.html
SOURCE Zillow