UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section
14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. 1)
☑ |
Filed by the Registrant |
☐ |
Filed by a party other
than the Registrant |
|
CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX: |
☑ |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
☐ |
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only
(as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
☐ |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
☐ |
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
☐ |
|
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |

Ingevity Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its
Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy
Statement, if other than the Registrant)
PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (CHECK ALL BOXES THAT APPLY): |
☑ |
|
No fee required |
☐ |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials |
☐ |
|
Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11 |
Table of Contents

Table of Contents
REVISED PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT - SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
DATED MARCH 19, 2025

MESSAGE TO OUR STOCKHOLDERS
Luis Fernandez-Moreno | March __, 2025
|
Dear Fellow Ingevity Stockholders,
It is my pleasure to invite you to the 2025 annual meeting of stockholders
(the “Annual Meeting”) of Ingevity Corporation (“Ingevity,” the “Company” or “us”)
on behalf of Ingevity’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). The Annual Meeting will be held virtually via live
audio webcast on April 30, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time.
Bold actions are underway across the Company – to our
leadership, portfolio, operating priorities, and cost structure – to drive profitable growth and significant,
sustainable value creation for all Ingevity stockholders. These actions are delivering results, and we believe our momentum
is just beginning.
New leadership, new priorities and a team focused on execution
To accelerate improved performance and best position the Company for the future, in October 2024, our Board of Directors initiated a search for a new chief executive officer, and in March 2025, announced the appointment of accomplished specialty materials leader, David H. Li, as Ingevity’s next president and CEO. We are confident that Mr. Li will further strengthen performance and best position the Company for the future and are excited to welcome him to Ingevity soon. We further strengthened Ingevity’s executive team with the addition of experienced manufacturing and chemical industry leaders: Michael N. Shukov as senior vice president and president, Advanced Polymer Technologies in 2025, and in 2024, Terry Dyer as Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer, and Ryan Fisher as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary.
Working alongside the Board and Ingevity team, we launched new strategic
priorities last fall – execution excellence, reducing leverage, and portfolio optimization. I am proud of our employees’
focus and execution in each of these areas.
On a consolidated basis, we delivered adjusted EBITDA* for fiscal 2024
of $363 million, exceeding analyst estimates, and improved EBITDA Margins* by 350 basis points to 25.8%. We realized a total of $84 million in cost savings in 2024
and generated $51 million of free cash flow* despite $200 million of cash outflows related to our repositioning actions. This enabled
us to reduce debt and lower our leverage ratio in the second half of the year. Segment performance is also improving.
Record year for Performance Materials
In 2024, we delivered record performance in our Performance
Materials segment for both sales and EBITDA. The fourth quarter of 2024 marked the sixth consecutive quarter of EBITDA
margins surpassing 50%, driven by pricing and operational efficiency initiatives. We expect continued positive results in
this business as ICE vehicles increasingly become more fuel-efficient and consumer preferences further trend toward hybrids.
We are also making progress in developing new markets for our carbon technologies in silicon anode batteries through our
investment in Nexeon.
Transforming Performance Chemicals
The increased EBITDA margins we reported for the Performance Chemicals
segment in the second half of 2024 demonstrate our work to proactively manage this business by exiting lower margin cyclical end
markets, reducing our physical footprint to optimize costs and diversifying our raw material stream. In addition, we addressed
uneconomic long-term contracts, which previously hindered our ability to manage the cost and timing of key raw material purchases.
*Reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the nearest GAAP measure can be found in Appendix A.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
1 |
Table of Contents
Message To Our Stockholders
Advanced Polymer Technologies demonstrating resiliency
We achieved increased sales volumes in 2024 for the Advanced Polymers
Technologies segment even in challenging market conditions. Although demand is expected to remain flat in the near term, we believe
long-term this segment will generate 20% or better margins, driven by greater industrial demand in existing markets supported by
more innovation in high-growth areas such as bioplastics used in food packaging and apparel.
Reshaping portfolio to focus on higher growth, higher margin opportunities
On October 30, 2024, we publicly announced that we were reviewing our
business portfolio, a review which began in March 2024, and which has been one of my top priorities since assuming the interim
CEO role.
As part of this review, we announced on January 16, 2025, our decision
to explore strategic alternatives for a majority of our Performance Chemicals Industrial Specialties product lines and our North
Charleston, South Carolina, crude tall oil refinery. Exiting most of the Industrial Specialties product line is expected to strengthen
the Performance Chemicals segment further and enable us to focus our attention on higher growth and higher margin opportunities
within our portfolio while increasing the Company’s earnings and cash flow.
We are proceeding expeditiously with the review of Industrial Specialties
and the refinery and expect to communicate a path forward by year end. We are also continuing to review the rest of our portfolio.
Continuing to enhance the Ingevity board with fresh, qualified perspectives
Over the last three years, Ingevity has added three new independent
directors to the Company’s nine-member Board, including J. Kevin Willis, senior vice president and chief financial
officer of Ashland Inc. in December 2024. Kevin’s appointment follows a search that began in June 2024 with the
assistance of an independent search firm. Kevin played an integral role in Ashland’s successful separation from
Valvoline and the reorganization of Ashland’s European operations and brings highly relevant experience in the chemical
industry. He also brings extensive financial planning, capital allocation analysis, and business development experience,
which make him well suited to help oversee and guide the management team on the Company’s new strategic priorities and
the improvement initiatives we are pursuing.
Thank you for your investment
I am immensely proud of the progress we are making to transform Ingevity
for the future. On behalf of the Board, I extend a warm welcome to our incoming CEO, David Li, and look forward to working alongside him to facilitate a smooth transition and execute appropriate actions to ensure our business portfolio
and cost structure are aligned with our objectives of being a specialty chemicals leader, driving profitable growth and creating
value for our stockholders.
Thank you for your continued investment in Ingevity. Our premier
activated carbon platform, leading specialty chemicals business, global footprint and innovative employees provide a strong foundation
for success. We are bullish about the future and confident in our ability to strengthen our position as a world class specialty
chemicals leader. We hope you share our enthusiasm for Ingevity and the exciting opportunities ahead.
Best regards,

Luis Fernandez-Moreno
Interim President and CEO
2 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Message To Our Stockholders
Additional information about this year’s Annual Meeting
The accompanying notice of Annual Meeting and proxy statement are being
mailed to each holder of record of the Company’s common stock (the “Common Stock”) as of the record date, March 3,
2025. Please see “Questions and Answers about the Annual Meeting, Proxy Solicitation and Voting Information” for
additional information about how to attend, vote, examine the list of stockholders and submit questions during the Annual Meeting.
You can participate in the Annual Meeting, submit questions and vote your shares of the Common Stock during the Annual Meeting by
visiting www.cesonlineservices.com/ngvt25_vm. To participate in the Annual Meeting, you should register at
www.cesonlineservices.com/ngvt25_vm by 11:59 PM (Eastern Time) on April 28, 2025. Further details regarding participation,
voting and the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting appear in the accompanying notice of the Annual Meeting and proxy
statement.
Your vote will be especially important at
this year’s Annual Meeting. Vision One Fund, LP (“VOF”) on behalf of itself and Vision One Management Partners,
LP (“VOMP”, collectively with VOF, its affiliates and other persons identified in proxy solicitation materials filed
on their behalf “Vision One”) has notified the company that it has nominated Julio C. Acero and F. David Segal for election
as directors at the Annual Meeting in opposition to the nominees recommended by the Board. You may receive solicitation
materials from Vision One, including proxy statements and gold proxy cards. Ingevity is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness
of any information provided by or on behalf of Vision One or its nominees or any other statements Vision One may make.
The Board unanimously does NOT endorse any of the nominees for director
submitted by Vision One and unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” each of the nine highly qualified nominees proposed
by the Board on the enclosed WHITE proxy card or WHITE voting instruction form: Jean S. Blackwell, Luis Fernandez-Moreno, Diane H. Gulyas, Bruce D. Hoechner, Frederick J. Lynch, Karen G. Narwold, Daniel F. Sansone, J. Kevin Willis, and Benjamin G. (Shon) Wright. We strongly urge you to discard and NOT to vote using any gold proxy card
sent to you by Vision One. If you have already submitted a gold proxy card sent to you by, or on behalf of, Vision One, you can
revoke such proxy and vote for the Board’s nine nominees and on the other matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting by marking,
signing and dating the enclosed WHITE proxy card or WHITE voting instruction form and returning it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope or by using the
information on the WHITE proxy card or WHITE voting instruction form to vote via the Internet or telephone
by otherwise following the instructions on your WHITE proxy card, or WHITE voting instruction form. Only your latest
validly executed proxy will count, and any proxy may be revoked at any time prior to its exercise at the Annual Meeting as described
in the accompanying proxy statement.
Please note that this year, your proxy card looks different. It has more names on it than there are seats up for election,
under recent requirements called a “universal proxy card.” This means the Company’s proxy card is required to list
the Vision One nominees in addition to the Board’s nominees. Please mark your card carefully and only vote “FOR”
the nine nominees and all other proposals recommended by the Board.
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting virtually, we
urge you to vote and submit your proxy in advance of the Annual Meeting by one of the methods described in the proxy
materials using the WHITE proxy card or WHITE instruction form or notice. Your vote will mean
that you are represented at the Annual Meeting even if you do not attend virtually.
If you have any questions or require any assistance with voting your shares, please call Ingevity’s proxy solicitor:

Innisfree M&A Incorporated
501 Madison Avenue, 20th floor
New York, New York 10022
Shareholders may call toll free: (877) 687-1874
Banks and Brokers may call collect: (212) 750-5833
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
3 |
Table of Contents

NOTICE
of 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Ingevity Corporation
|
How to vote:
 |
Online
Vote online using
the control number on your WHITE proxy card at the voting website indicated.
|
|
|
 |
By phone
Locate the control number on your WHITE
proxy card to vote by calling the toll-free number indicated.
|
|
|
 |
By mail
Mark, date and sign your WHITE proxy card and return it in the enclosed postage pre-paid envelope
|
|
|
 |
During the virtual meeting
See “Questions and Answers about the Annual
Meeting, Proxy Solicitation, and Voting Information” for details on how to virtually attend and vote during the meeting
|
YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT!
If you have any questions about the Annual
Meeting or how to vote your shares, please contact the firm assisting us with the solicitation of proxies:
INNISFREE M&A INCORPORATED:
(877) 687-1874 (toll-free
from the U.S. and Canada)
or +1 (412) 232-3651 from
other countries
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
DATE
& TIME
April 30, 2025
9:30 a.m.
Eastern Time
|
LIVE AUDIO WEBCAST
LOCATION
www.cesonlineservices.com/ngvt25_vm
See “Questions and Answers about the Annual Meeting, Proxy Solicitation, and Voting Information” for details on how to pre-register and participate at the meeting
|
RECORD
DATE
March 3, 2025
Holders of record of our Common Stock at the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to receive notice of, virtually attend, and vote at the Annual Meeting
|
To allow our stockholders greater
access to the meeting and lower the barriers to stockholder participation, our Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual format
only with no physical meeting location.
Items of business
At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked
to act on the following items:
|
■ |
Elect nine (9) director nominees; |
|
■ |
Approve, on a non-binding, advisory
basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers; |
|
■ |
Ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2025; |
|
■ |
Approve the Ingevity Corporation 2025
Omnibus Incentive Plan; and |
|
■ |
Consider any other business properly brought before the meeting. |
Additional information
Please note that
Vision One has provided notice of its nomination of two nominees for election to the Company’s Board at the Annual
Meeting in opposition to the nominees recommended by our Board. Pursuant to SEC rules, we are required to reflect the Vision One
nominees on our WHITE proxy card; however, our Board does not endorse the
Vision One nominees and urges you to use the WHITE proxy card or WHITE
voting instruction form to vote FOR only the nine (9) nominees recommended by the Board. You cannot vote FOR more than nine nominees
at the Annual Meeting. You are permitted to vote FOR fewer than nine nominees. If you vote FOR less than nine nominees, your shares
will only be voted FOR those nominees you have marked. If you vote FOR more than nine nominees, your votes on Proposal 1 regarding
nominees will be invalid and will not be counted.
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting
virtually, we urge you to review the proxy materials carefully and to use your WHITE proxy card to vote in advance
as promptly as possible.
By Order of the Board of Directors,

Ryan C. Fisher
Corporate Secretary
4 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
This page intentionally left blank.
Table of Contents
Table
of Contents
6 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Table
of Contents
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
7 |
Table of Contents
Proxy Statement Summary
This summary highlights information about Ingevity
Corporation and certain information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) for our 2025
Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”). This summary does not contain all of the information that you
should consider in deciding to vote. Please read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.
Agenda
Items and Board Recommendations
Proposal |
Board
Vote
Recommendation |
Page |
Proposal 1: Election of Directors |
FOR
only each of our Board’s
9 director nominees |
18 |
■ Our
Board consists of a group of accomplished and highly qualified leaders who possess the requisite skills, experience, and character to effectively
oversee Ingevity’s evolving needs and strategy |
|
■ Our Board is committed to refreshment, with three new independent directors
appointed since 2022, to bring new perspectives and skills required to develop and support Ingevity’s corporate strategy |
|
■ Vision One’s nominees lack relevant skills and experience as compared to the Board’s nominees. |
|
|
|
|
Proposal 2: Advisory vote on compensation of our Named Executive
Officers (Say-on-Pay) |
FOR |
45 |
■ Our executive compensation program is designed to align the interests
of our executives with our stockholders |
|
|
■ A significant portion of our executive’s compensation is contingent
on the achievement of financial metrics that deliver value to our stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal 3: Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2025 |
FOR |
88 |
■ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) is an internationally
renowned auditing firm with the requisite skill and experience to perform public company audits |
|
|
■ PwC has the right mix of long-term relationship to understand our
business and sufficient independence, with the recent refreshment of the audit partner, to effectively audit our financials |
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal 4: Approve the Ingevity Corporation 2025 Omnibus Incentive
Plan |
FOR |
91 |
■ Our existing 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan will expire in May 2026 |
|
|
■ The 2025 Omnibus Incentive Plan provides the Talent and Compensation
Committee of the Board appropriate tools to incentivize our employees across the organization to achieve results that are aligned with stockholder
interests |
|
|
8 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Proxy Statement
Summary
2024 Business Overview
2024 Business Overview
2024 was a transformational year
for Ingevity. Our Performance Materials segment delivered a record year for sales and segment EBITDA, our Advanced Polymer Technologies
segment increased sales volumes, and we took major steps to reposition our Performance Chemicals (“PC”) segment to focus on our more profitable end markets. The benefits of our repositioning actions translated to better than expected earnings, margins and cash flow for fiscal year 2024. We delivered adjusted EBITDA* of $363 million, exceeding analyst estimates,
and improved EBITDA margins* by 350 basis points to 25.8%.

INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
9 |
Table of Contents
Proxy
Statement Summary
2024 Achievements
2024 Achievements
Pursuing Excellence
|
■ |
Achieved American Chemistry Council top quartile
safety performance for 2024, successfully reaching our corporate sustainability safety goal to protect and prioritize the
safety and wellbeing of our people. |
|
■ |
Launched Zero Harm Behaviors safety management practices throughout
the U.S. and UK to further standardize proactive safety protocols and tools for evaluation of incidents and implement continuous
improvement strategies for workplace health and safety. The program launches in China in Q1 2025. |
|
■ |
Named as one of “America’s Most Responsible Companies”
by Newsweek magazine for 2025, marking the third consecutive year. This prestigious award recognizes the top 600 publicly
traded companies headquartered in the United States for their commitment to making a positive global impact. |
|
■ |
Added Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ashland
Global, J. Kevin Willis, as the ninth member of our experienced Board of Directors, providing substantial chemical industry,
finance and capital management expertise and experience driving corporate transformation. |
|
■ |
Further strengthened Ingevity’s executive team with the addition
of experienced manufacturing and chemical industry leaders: Terry Dyer as Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources
Officer, and Ryan Fisher as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. |
|
■ |
Achieved top 16% in the chemicals industry score in our rating from
the 2025 S&P Global Corporate Sustainability Assessment, reflecting an increase from our 2024 score, and a ranking of
Committed in our 2024 EcoVadis assessment, benchmarking our management of material environmental, social and governance (ESG)
risks, opportunities and impacts. |
|
■ |
Ingevity and our employees donated over 4,900 volunteer hours through
our IngeviCares philanthropy program in 2024 in support of our sustainability goal to make a positive impact in the communities
where we operate, increasing overall employee volunteerism involvement by over 700 hours over 2023. |

10 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Proxy Statement Summary
Snapshot of the Board’s Director Nominees
Snapshot of the Board’s Director Nominees
|
Name |
|
Age
|
|
Director
Since |
|
Principal
Occupation |
|
Independent |
|
Committee
Memberships* |
|
Other Public
Company
Boards |
 |
JEAN S. BLACKWELL (CHAIR) |
|
70 |
|
2016 |
|
Former Senior Executive at Cummins Inc. |
|
 |
|
– T&C
– N&G
– Executive (Chair) |
|
2 |
 |
LUIS FERNANDEZ-MORENO |
|
62 |
|
2016 |
|
Interim President and CEO, Ingevity Corporation; Sole Member and
Manager, Strat and Praxis LLC; Former Senior Vice President and President, Chemicals Group at Ashland Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
 |
DIANE H. GULYAS |
|
68 |
|
2019 |
|
Former President, DuPont Performance Polymers, E.I. du Pont de
Nemours |
|
 |
|
– T&C (Chair)
– N&G
– Executive |
|
1 |
 |
BRUCE D. HOECHNER |
|
65 |
|
2023 |
|
Former CEO,
Rogers Corporation |
|
 |
|
– T&C
– N&G (Chair)
– Executive |
|
1 |
 |
FREDERICK J. LYNCH |
|
60 |
|
2016 |
|
Operating Partner, AEA Investors LP; Former President and
CEO, Masonite International Corporation |
|
 |
|
– Audit
– T&C |
|
|
 |
KAREN G. NARWOLD |
|
65 |
|
2019 |
|
Former EVP, Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel and Corporate
Secretary, Albemarle Corporation |
|
 |
|
– Audit
– S&S (Chair)
– Executive |
|
1 |
 |
DANIEL F. SANSONE |
|
72 |
|
2016 |
|
Former EVP, Strategy and CFO, Vulcan Materials Company |
|
 |
|
– Audit (Chair)
– T&C
– Executive |
|
1 |
 |
J. KEVIN WILLIS |
|
59 |
|
2024 |
|
SVP and CFO, Ashland Inc. |
|
 |
|
– Audit
– S&S |
|
|
 |
BENJAMIN
G. (SHON) WRIGHT |
|
50 |
|
2022 |
|
Vice President and President, Distribution Business, Cummins Incorporated |
|
 |
|
– Audit
– S&S |
|
|
* |
Audit – Audit Committee |
|
T&C – Talent and Compensation Committee |
|
N&G – Nominating and Governance Committee |
|
S&S – Sustainability and Safety Committee |
|
Executive – Executive Committee |
Board Demographics
63.4 years |
6 years |
3 new |
3/9 |
2/9 |
3/5 |
8/9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE
AGE |
MEDIAN
TENURE |
DIRECTORS
ADDED SINCE 2022 |
DIRECTORS
ARE WOMEN |
DIRECTORS
IDENTIFY AS RACIALLY OR ETHNICALLY DIVERSE |
COMMITTEES
AND BOARD CHAIRED BY WOMEN |
DIRECTORS
ARE INDEPENDENT |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
11 |
Table of Contents
Proxy Statement Summary
Corporate Governance Highlights
Corporate Governance Highlights
We recognize that strong corporate governance practices
contribute to long-term stockholder value. We are committed to sound governance practices, including those described below.
Board
Independence, Composition, and Accountability |
|
■ 8 of 9 directors are independent, including the Chair
■ Separate Chair and CEO roles
■ Five fully independent Board committees
■ Regular Board and committee executive sessions
■ Board with diverse skills, experiences and backgrounds
■ Director overboarding policy
■ Director retirement age of 72 (unless waived by the Board on a case by case basis)
|
Best Practices |
|
■ Active stockholder engagement
program
■ Ongoing commitment to Board refreshment, with three new directors added
since 2022
■ Annual Board, committee and individual director self-evaluations
■ Board leadership role in CEO and executive succession planning
■ Robust enterprise risk management program that includes Board oversight
of key risk areas
■ Board oversight of sustainability matters and cybersecurity risk (primarily
through the Sustainability and Safety Committee)
■ Annual Sustainability Report containing measurable sustainability goals
■ Comprehensive new director orientation
■ Policy prohibiting officers, directors, and employees from hedging and
pledging our Common Stock
■ Robust stock ownership guidelines applicable to executives and directors
■ Comprehensive Code of Conduct and Ethics and Compliance Program |
Stockholder
Rights |
|
■ Annual election of all directors
■ Majority voting with director resignation policy (plurality in contested
elections)
■ Stockholders representing 50% of voting power may call special meetings
■ No poison pill
■ One share, one vote standard - no dual-class shares
■ No supermajority voting requirements
■ Annual advisory vote on executive compensation |
12 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Proxy Statement Summary
Executive Compensation Governance Practices
Executive Compensation Governance
Practices
The T&C Committee continues to implement and
maintain practices in our compensation programs and related areas that reflect responsible corporate governance and compensation
policies. These practices include the following:
What We Do |
|
What We Don’t Do |
 |
Use performance metrics to align pay
with Company financial performance |
|
 |
No repricing, backdating or discounting
of stock options |
 |
Balance short-term and long-term incentives
through focused use of performance metrics |
|
 |
No hedging, pledging or short sales
of Common Stock by any director, executive officer or other employee |
 |
Emphasize stock ownership with long-term
incentives being paid in Common Stock and meaningful Common Stock ownership guidelines |
|
 |
No excise tax gross-ups for change of
control payments |
 |
Maintain a “clawback” policy
for executive incentive compensation in the event of a restatement of financial results regardless of fault |
|
 |
No excessive perquisites |
 |
Use “double trigger” change
of control (with respect to replacement awards) for severance and equity vesting provisions |
|
 |
No tax gross-ups on perquisites other
than in connection with relocation benefits |
 |
Engage an independent consultant to
advise the T&C Committee |
|
|
|
 |
Discourage excessive risk taking by
offering a balanced compensation program that uses multiple incentive metrics that balance focus on achievement of long- and
short-term goals |
|
|
|
 |
Pay dividend equivalents only on stock
unit awards that vest, if any |
|
|
|
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
13 |
Table of Contents
Background to the Solicitation
The summary below provides background information
regarding the Company, the Board and our engagement with Vision One beginning in November 2024 through the date of this Proxy
Statement.
The Board and its Nominating & Governance
Committee (“N&G Committee”) regularly consider the composition of the Board with the intent of balancing, among
other considerations, the strengths of existing institutional knowledge, continuity and experience that certain longer-tenured
directors may bring while also regularly welcoming fresh perspectives and skills that may be beneficial to the Company’s
evolving needs and ability to navigate industry and business cycles, seize value creation opportunities, invest in new opportunities
and manage through risks and challenges. The Board and N&G Committee have put in place a robust, rigorous process, with a
long-term planning horizon, for routine board refreshment and effective director succession planning. This process is supplemented
by annual self-evaluations, support from nationally recognized third-party search firms, and feedback from the Company’s
investors. Accordingly, the Board has successfully recruited and identified nine highly-qualified directors, including the Company’s
interim CEO and eight independent directors with long records of achievement. In connection with the Board’s refreshment
process, the Board utilized nationally recognized search firms to add three new directors to the Board in the past three years.
These directors were added to further expand the Board’s industry and market depth, international manufacturing experience,
and capital allocation, restructuring and strategic experience.
We value and are committed to regular, meaningful
engagement with our stockholders. In 2024, we engaged with stockholders and potential stockholders 252 times via in-person meetings
and phone and video calls where we discussed a variety of topics, including capital allocation and leverage, portfolio review,
key raw material costs, financial results, and the CEO transition. Senior leadership participated in approximately 70% of these
engagements. In 2024, we also attended 14 conferences/roadshows hosted by analysts resulting in over 100 meetings with stockholders
or potential stockholders. We also broadcast live audio webcasts of quarterly earnings presentations to keep stockholders informed.
The Board and the Company’s senior management have long evaluated and pursued strategic steps to execute on the Company’s
strategy to focus on higher margin and higher growth products and optimize the Company’s manufacturing network in order
to achieve its objectives of improving profitability and reducing cyclicality. For example, on November 1, 2023, the Company announced
via press release steps it was taking to further reposition its Performance Chemicals segment, including the closure of its plant
in DeRidder, Louisiana. On July 31, 2024, the Company announced additional steps it had taken to advance the strategic repositioning
of its Performance Chemicals segment to drive the execution of its corporate strategy and maximize profitability, including the
closure of its plant in Crossett, Arkansas and moving oleo chemical refining to the North Charleston, South Carolina site’s
secondary refinery. To date, we have made significant progress in proactively managing our Performance Chemicals business, including
by exiting lower margin cyclical end markets, reducing our physical footprint to optimize costs, diversifying our raw material
streams, and addressing uneconomic long-term supply contracts.
On October 3, 2024, the Company announced that
John Fortson had departed the Company after serving in various roles since the Company’s separation from WestRock in 2016, including as
president, CEO and a member of the Board since 2020. The Company announced that Luis Fernandez-Moreno, a member of the Board since
2016, would serve as interim president and CEO during the Board’s extensive search process to identify a permanent president and CEO. This search process culminated on March 10, 2025 upon the announcement that David H. Li will be appointed as the Company’s next President and CEO, effective April 7, 2025.
On October 30, 2024, and prior to any engagement by Vision One, Mr.
Fernandez-Moreno stated during the Company’s third quarter 2024 earnings call, that one of his core areas of focus as interim
president and CEO would be to conduct a review of the Company’s portfolio of businesses and overall corporate strategy. This
review was first publicly disclosed once it had been sufficiently progressed internally. The review process first began at the Board
level in March 2024 in collaboration with senior members of management and, soon after, external advisors, including a major
investment bank and a leading accounting firm. Detailed discussion continued throughout the summer and at subsequent Board meetings,
including in June, July, September, October and December, at the last of which the Board approved the formal strategic alternatives
process for the majority of its Industrial Specialties business and the North Charleston refinery. The Company’s strategic
review process continues to this day as part of the Company’s strategy of focusing on higher margin and higher growth
products.
On November 14, 2024, Vision One filed a Form 13F
with the SEC disclosing its holding of 112,521 Ingevity shares, which represented 0.31% of the total outstanding shares
of the Company as of October 28, 2024. This was the first 13F filing that reflected Vision One’s position in the Company.
On November 26, 2024, Courtney Mather and Julio
Acero of Vision One sent a letter addressed to the Board via email to Mr. Fisher. The letter stated Vision One’s views regarding
the Company’s financial performance, history of acquisitions, and governance. In their letter Vision One demanded that the Company’s Board initiate a strategic review process to explore alternatives for the Performance Chemicals and
14 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Background to the Solicitation
Advanced Polymer Technologies segments, add a director to its Board who is a stockholder representative and implement certain corporate governance changes. Vision One also requested to promptly speak to the Company regarding its views and
requested copies of the forms that a proposed director nominee would be required to furnish in accordance with the Company’s
Bylaws if it were to nominate a director for election at the next annual meeting. Neither the Company nor any members of the Board
had received any requests for engagement or any other feedback from Vision One prior to the letter.
Mr. Fisher confirmed receipt of the letter to Mr. Mather by email on the same day.
On December 3, 2024, Mr. Fernandez-Moreno sent
a letter addressed to Mr. Mather and Mr. Acero via email from Mr. Fisher, which letter invited them to meet to
discuss their letter and their perspectives on Ingevity and its corporate strategy with Mr. Fernandez-Moreno and Ms. Blackwell, with the goal of developing a constructive
dialogue focused on maximizing stockholder value.
On December 6, 2024, Mr. Fisher provided Mr. Mather
a copy of the requested questionnaire that is required to be submitted by all director candidates in connection with their nomination
and directed Mr. Mather to the advance notice provisions contained within the Company’s Bylaws for additional requirements
for Board nominations.
On December 12, 2024, Mr. Fernandez-Moreno and
Ms. Blackwell spoke to representatives from Vision One, including Mr. Mather, via teleconference regarding why they invested in
the Company, their views about potential strategic alternatives for the Company’s businesses, and their perspectives about
the Company’s current strategy and capital allocation. During this meeting, Mr. Fernandez-Moreno referred to his October
30 announcement and reiterated that the Company was actively progressing on various fronts and was already in the process of evaluating
its portfolio, but that he was unable to share any non-public specifics. Further, Mr. Fernandez-Moreno assured the Vision One
representatives that he would relay their thoughts to the entire Board.
On December 16, 2024, the Board, including all
members of the N&G Committee, had a regularly scheduled meeting during which they discussed Vision One’s letter and
the subsequent conversation with Mr. Fernandez-Moreno and Ms. Blackwell. The Board also discussed its continued strategic review
of the Company’s portfolio and corporate strategy.
As part of the Company’s ongoing board refreshment
process, on December 16, 2024, Ingevity announced the appointment of J. Kevin Willis to
the Board, which was the culmination of a search process that first began in June 2024 and was conducted with the assistance of an independent search
firm. Mr. Willis brings extensive experience as a CFO of a publicly traded, sustainability-focused specialty chemicals company
with international reach, as well as integral skills in strategic planning and execution, including returns-driven capital allocation
planning, operating efficiencies initiatives and business portfolio management. In appointing him, the Board expressed its
confidence in Mr. Willis and emphasized the importance of adding a director whose profile and skillsets complement the
existing Board and the needs of the Company, enhancing the Board’s composition for the next stage of the Company’s growth.
On January 16, 2025, Ingevity announced plans to
explore strategic alternatives for most of the industrial specialties product line of its Performance Chemicals Segment and portions
of its North Charleston refinery. In the press release announcing the initiation of this process, Mr. Fernandez-Moreno said, “Ingevity’s management team and Board are committed to taking aggressive action to deliver more
shareholder value” and that “we are continuing to evaluate the rest of the Ingevity portfolio.”
Without any further substantive engagement by Vision
One since the December 12, 2024 conversations, on January 21, 2025, Vision One delivered to Mr. Fisher its formal notice (the
“Nomination Notice”), informing Ingevity for the first time of its intent to nominate Mr. Acero and Mr. Mather, two
fund principals, and Dr. Merri J. Sanchez and Mr. F. David Segal (the “Vision One Nominees”) for election to our Board
at the 2025 annual meeting of stockholders and providing completed questionnaires for each nominee. The Nomination Notice
also indicated that, as of the date of the notice, Vision One was the beneficial owner of 1.15% of the Company’s shares.
Mr. Fisher confirmed receipt of the letter to Mr. Mather by email on the same day.
In the days that followed, members of the Board,
led by Bruce Hoechner, the independent Chair of the N&G Committee, and members of Ingevity’s senior management, discussed, as
part of the Company’s established process, the Nomination Notice and the biographical information on the Vision One Nominees
contained therein and performed due diligence on their disclosed affiliations and experience.
On January 27, 2025, Mr. Fisher contacted Mr. Mather
by email to start the process of setting up interviews for each Vision One Nominee with the N&G Committee.
On February 6 and 7, 2025, the N&G Committee
interviewed each Vision One Nominee by videoconference separately, with a focus on understanding the background, skills and experiences
that they could bring to the Board. Following the interviews, the members of the N&G Committee discussed each Vision One Nominee and
what the N&G Committee learned about such nominee during the call, while taking into account the existing Board composition,
the skills matrix for the Vision One Nominees as compared to the current Board, and the current and future strategic needs of
the Company.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
15 |
Table of Contents
Background to the Solicitation
On February 10, 2025, as part of its ordinary course
process to consider and nominate director candidates for election to the Board at the next annual meeting of stockholders, the
N&G Committee met to carefully review the experience, skills matrix, qualifications and other attributes of its incumbent
directors, the Vision One Nominees and the profiles of other potential director candidates that had been previously identified
to the N&G Committee or recently identified by the Company’s advisors. The goal of this process was to cultivate a complementary
mix of individuals with diverse professional backgrounds, expertise in and familiarity with the industry, a track record of accomplishment
and engagement, knowledge and skills reflecting the broad set of opportunities and dynamics that the Board and management would
continue to navigate as part of the Company’s initiatives to enhance stockholder value and manage risks.
Following its consideration of all candidates for
nomination, the N&G Committee concluded not to recommend the candidacy of any of the Vision One Nominees to the Board because,
among other reasons, it determined that each of Vision One’s Nominees lacked experience in the specialty chemicals sector,
public company executive experience, capital allocation expertise and portfolio management expertise and would not meaningfully improve the mix of operational,
portfolio management or capital allocation expertise that was already present on the Board, skills which the N&G Committee
believed to be priorities given the Company’s ongoing evaluation of operational improvements and portfolio review. The N&G
Committee ultimately concluded that the current Board, which includes the three independent directors that were added in the past
three years, was best positioned to advance the Company’s strategic plan and recommended to the Board that the Board nominate
and recommend to its stockholders that they vote for all the incumbent directors: Jean S. Blackwell, Luis Fernandez-Moreno, Diane
H. Gulyas, Bruce D. Hoechner, Frederick J. Lynch, Karen G. Narwold, Daniel F. Sansone, Kevin Willis and Benjamin G. (Shon) Wright.
During that same meeting, the N&G Committee also discussed its willingness, in the interest of seeking a constructive resolution with Vision One, to
consider appointing to the Board a new, mutually agreeable candidate with Vision One whose profile, skillset and expertise would
be better positioned to help the Company achieve its goals, such as, without limitation, any of the other viable candidates that
the N&G Committee had previously identified in its candidate searches, which list it consistently refreshed with its advisors.
On February 10, 2025, at its regularly scheduled
meeting, the Board approved the recommendations of the N&G Committee regarding nominees to the Board, including proposing
to Vision One that they collaborate with the Board in appointing a new, mutually agreed candidate to the Board whose profile better
fits the present needs of the Company and the Board.
On February 14, 2025, Ms. Blackwell contacted Mr.
Mather by email to request a call to continue the discussions regarding Vision One’s interest in the Company and the Vision
One Nominees.
On February 14, 2025, Vision One filed a Form 13F
with the SEC disclosing its holding of 410,648 Ingevity shares, which represented approximately 1.134% of the total outstanding
shares of the Company as of December 31, 2024.
On February 18, 2025, the Company reported its
financial results for the fourth quarter and full year 2024, in which it beat certain consensus projections and announced, among
other things, a record year in Performance Materials for both sales and EBITDA, with margins surpassing 50%, and significant
savings as part of our Performance Chemicals repositioning actions. On the earnings call the following day, Mr. Fernandez-Moreno
emphasized that the Company had been taking proactive steps to improve performance and enhance stockholder value, and that the
Company and the Board remained focused on maximizing value for the Company’s stockholders.
On February 19, 2025, representatives of the Company’s
Investor Relations Team spoke with Vision One as part of its customary post-earnings call stockholder engagement.
On February 20, 2025, Ms. Blackwell and Mr. Hoechner
spoke with Mr. Mather by phone to inform them that the Board did not nominate the Vision One Nominees. In an effort to advance
a constructive resolution with Vision One and deepen our engagement and dialogue, the Board extended an invitation to Vision One
to share its perspectives on the Company directly with the Board in two weeks’ time. The Board also offered to work
with Vision One to identify a mutually agreeable candidate to join the Board whose profile, skills and experience were better
positioned to help the Company execute on its strategic plan and be most beneficial to the Company at this stage of its growth.
Mr. Mather rejected the proposals outright without any further discussion or engagement and indicated that Vision One would be
proceeding with a proxy contest.
On February 25, 2025, Vision One publicly disclosed
its engagement with the Company by filing proxy soliciting material with the SEC in the form of a presentation that disclosed
its four director nominees and outlined its views and criticisms of the Company, and to which presentation it attached the November
26, 2024 letter that it had previously sent to the Board. Among other things, the February 25, 2025 presentation was notably the first time Vision One raised the issue of CEO succession and selection with the Company, despite having engaged with members of the Board and management on numerous occasions over the preceding three months.
16 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Background to the Solicitation
Later on February 25, 2025, the Company issued a press
release and stockholder letter in addition to a letter to the Company’s employees in response to Vision One’s presentation,
highlighting the various actions that were underway at the Company to drive improved performance and value creation at the Company,
including, among others, its recent financial results, its ongoing strategic review process, the CEO search process and the recent
Board refreshment, all of which had been initiated prior to Vision One’s engagement with the Company. It also provided detail on its proposal to collaborate with Vision One to identify a mutually agreed director for appointment to the Board and for Vision One to present their views to the Board. The Company reiterated
that despite Vision One’s rejection of the Company’s efforts to engage constructively amid the Company’s CEO
search and active strategic review process, the Company remained open to further engagement with Vision One in a manner that would
best serve the interests of all Ingevity stockholders.
On March 3, 2025, the Company notified Vision One that the Company intends to solicit proxies for the following nine director nominees: Jean S. Blackwell, Luis Fernandez-Moreno, Diane H. Gulyas, Bruce D. Hoechner, Frederick J. Lynch, Karen G. Narwold, Daniel F. Sansone, J. Kevin Willis and Benjamin G. (Shon) Wright.
On March 6, 2025, Vision One filed an amended version of its February 25, 2025 presentation with certain corrections and additional soliciting material.
On March 10, 2025, the Company filed its preliminary
proxy statement with the SEC.
Later on March 10, 2025, the Board appointed David H. Li as the Company’s next president and CEO, effective April 7, 2025. Mr. Li has more than 25 years of experience in the specialty materials industry and most recently served as CEO, president and a member of the board of CMC Materials, Inc. prior to its sale to Entegris, Inc. in 2022.
Although Vision One had not sought to re-engage since it rejected the Company’s offer to identify a mutually acceptable director nominee and present their views to the Board, the Company believed the recent successful culmination of its leadership search created an opportunity for constructive resolution. Later that same day, Mr. Fisher emailed a letter to Mr. Mather from Mr. Fernandez-Moreno offering to introduce Mr. Mather to Mr. Li if desired and offering Mr. Mather a few times for a call in the next few days with him and Ms. Blackwell.
That evening, Mr. Mather confirmed receipt of the letter to Mr. Fisher by email and submitted a supplement to Vision One’s nomination notice, stating that the Chemours Company (NYSE: CC) had nominated Mr. Mather for election to their board of directors at their upcoming annual meeting. The supplement also stated that Vision One had decided to reduce its nomination slate from four to two nominees, but that it had not yet determined who of the original four nominees would continue on its slate.
On March 11, 2025, Mr. Mather contacted Mr. Fisher by email requesting to meet with Mr. Fernandez-Moreno and Ms. Blackwell at the previously proposed time on March 13, 2025. Mr. Fisher confirmed the meeting time to Mr. Mather by email on the same day and scheduled the virtual meeting.
On the morning of March 12, 2025, the Company continued to execute on its succession planning by announcing the appointment of Michael N. Shukov as its new Senior Vice President and President of Advanced Polymer Technologies.
Later on March 12, 2025, Mr. Fernandez-Moreno and Ms. Blackwell met with Mr. Mather and reiterated their offer to work with Vision One to identify a mutually agreeable board member and their offer to have Vision One present their views to the full Board. In the meeting, Mr. Mather reiterated his rejection of the existing offer to appoint a mutually agreeable board member, but indicated that he would be willing to agree to the appointment of just one director, so long as it was either Mr. Mather himself or the other fund principal, Mr. Acero. Mr. Fernandez-Moreno and Ms. Blackwell indicated that they would take Vision One’s position back to the Board. Mr. Mather also again rejected the offer to present to the full Board.
After deliberation, the Board concluded that adding a Vision One fund
principal was not in the best interests of the Company or its stockholders. On March 13, 2025, Mr. Fisher contacted Mr. Mather by
email to organize a meeting later that day, at which meeting Mr. Fernandez-Moreno delivered the Board’s determination. Mr.
Fernandez-Moreno further expressed that the Board remained open to the previous offer of appointing a mutually agreeable candidate,
and offered to present two potential candidates under a standard non-disclosure agreement; if this position was not acceptable, Mr.
Fernandez-Moreno requested that Mr. Mather offer another proposal. Mr. Fernandez-Moreno also noted that the Board remains open to
having Vision One present their views directly to the Board. Mr. Mather expressed no interest in the renewed offer or the
opportunity to learn the identity of the potential nominees under NDA, and he offered no counterproposal.
On March 14, 2025, Vision One filed its preliminary proxy statement with
the SEC, expressing for the first time that its revised slate will now consist of only Julio C. Acero and F. David Segal.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
17 |
Table of Contents
PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
 |
OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR
EACH BOARD NOMINEE ON THE WHITE PROXY CARD:
■ Jean S. Blackwell;
■ Luis Fernandez-Moreno;
■ Diane H. Gulyas;
■ Bruce D. Hoechner;
■ Frederick J. Lynch;
■ Karen G. Narwold;
■ Daniel F. Sansone;
■ J. Kevin Willis; and
■ Benjamin G. (Shon) Wright. |
Our Board currently has nine members, each of whom
were elected at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, except J. Kevin Willis, who was appointed to the Board in December 2024.
Our Nominating & Governance Committee has recommended, and the Board has nominated, the nine incumbent directors for election
at the Annual Meeting: Jean S. Blackwell, Luis Fernandez-Moreno, Diane H. Gulyas, Bruce D. Hoechner, Frederick J. Lynch, Karen
G. Narwold, Daniel F. Sansone, J. Kevin Willis, and Benjamin G. (Shon) Wright.
Each director elected at the Annual Meeting will
serve until the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor has been elected and qualified. Each Board
nominee has consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and to serving as a director if elected. If any Board nominee is unable
to stand for election for any reason, the Common Stock represented at our Annual Meeting by proxy may be voted for another candidate
proposed by our Board.
As previously described, Vision One has notified
us of its nomination of Julio C. Acero and F. David Segal for election as directors at the Annual Meeting in opposition to the nominees recommended
by our Board. The Board unanimously does NOT endorse any of the nominees for director submitted by Vision One and unanimously
recommends that you only vote “FOR” each of the highly qualified nominees proposed by our Board on the enclosed WHITE proxy card or WHITE voting instruction form. We strongly urge you to discard and NOT to vote using any gold proxy card sent to you by Vision
One. If you have already submitted a gold proxy card sent to you by, or on behalf of, Vision One, you can revoke such
proxy and vote for the Board’s nominees and on the other matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting by marking, signing
and dating the enclosed WHITE proxy card and returning it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope or by using the
information on the WHITE proxy card or WHITE voting instruction form or notice to vote via the Internet
or telephone by otherwise following the instructions on your WHITE proxy card or WHITE voting instruction
form. Only your latest validly executed proxy will count, and any proxy may be revoked at any time prior to its exercise at the
Annual Meeting as described in this proxy statement. Stockholders cannot vote “FOR” more than nine nominees
at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders are permitted to vote “FOR” fewer that nine nominees. If you vote “FOR” less than nine nominees, your shares will only be voted “FOR” those nominees you have marked. If you vote “FOR” more than nine nominees, your votes on Proposal 1 regarding nominees will be invalid and will not be counted.
18 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Proposal 1 Election of Directors
Recommendation of the Board
Recommendation of the Board
 |
The Nominating & Governance Committee and
the Board believe that, as a group, the Board nominees listed on the WHITE proxy card provide our Board with a strong balance of experience, leadership,
qualifications, attributes and skills, and that each individual nominee has and can continue to make a significant contribution to the Board and
should serve as a director of the Company. The information that follows below summarizes the particular experience, qualifications, attributes
and skills of each Board nominee in greater detail. The Board recommends that you use the WHITE proxy card or WHITE voting instruction form to
vote “FOR” only each of the nominees proposed by the Board. The Board does NOT endorse any of the Vision One Nominees.
After considering the Vision One Nominees in accordance with its ordinary course procedures for evaluating director nominees, the Nominating
& Governance Committee and the Board unanimously determined that the Vision One Nominees lacked the experience and attributes
that the Nominating & Governance Committee and the Board believe are critical to serving the Company’s governance
needs and supporting the execution of the Company’s long-term strategy. Among other factors considered by the Nominating
& Governance Committee and the Board, particular emphasis was placed on industry experience, public company executive experience, capital allocation
and strategic transaction experience and other relevant expertise. The Board strongly urges you to discard any materials
sent to you by Vision One, including any gold proxy card that may be sent to you by Vision One. If you have already
voted using a gold proxy card sent to you by Vision One, you have every right to change your vote and we strongly
urge you to revoke that proxy by using the WHITE proxy card or WHITE voting instruction form to vote in favor of only the nine nominees recommended
by the Board — by Internet, telephone or by signing, dating and returning the enclosed WHITE proxy card or WHITE voting instruction form. |
Vote Required:
As a result of Vision One’s nomination of two persons for election as
directors at the Annual Meeting in opposition to the nominees recommended by our Board, and, because such nominees have not been
withdrawn at least fourteen (14) days in advance of the filing of Ingevity’s definitive proxy statement, directors will be
elected on a plurality basis, as provided in our Bylaws. This means that the nine director nominees receiving the greatest number of
votes cast “FOR” their election will be elected. Abstentions and any broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the
election (except to the extent they otherwise reduce the number of shares voted FOR the applicable nominee(s)).
In the event that Vision One withdraws its nominees,
abandons its solicitation or fails to comply with the universal proxy rules after you have already voted, stockholders can still sign and date a later submitted WHITE proxy card and any votes cast in favor of Vision One's nominees will be disregarded and will not be counted, whether such vote is provided
on a WHITE proxy card or Vision One’s gold proxy card. Only the latest validly executed proxy that you submit will be counted any proxy
may be revoked at any time prior to its exercise at the Annual Meeting.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
19 |
Table of Contents
Proposal 1 Election of Directors
Board Nominees for Director
Board Nominees for Director
JEAN
S. BLACKWELL
Independent
Director and Board Chair |

Committee Membership:
■ Executive
(Chair)
■ Talent and Compensation
■ Nominating and Governance
Director Since: 2016
Independent Chair Since: 2021
Age: 70
Current Public Company
Boards:
■ Johnson Controls International (NYSE:
JCI) (since 2018)
Other Notable Boards/Affiliations:
■ Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE) (2014
– 2024)
■ Essendant (previously publicly traded;
NASDAQ: USTR, NASDAQ: ESND) (2007 – 2018)
■ The Nassau Companies of New York
(previously publicly traded; NYSE: PFX) (2004 – 2009)
Education:
■ B.A., Economics, College of William
and Mary
■ J.D., University of Michigan |
KEY BOARD CONTRIBUTIONS
Ms. Blackwell is an accomplished corporate
executive and public company director with strong financial acumen and extensive knowledge of the business operations
of publicly traded companies across different sectors, including specialty chemicals, automotive, wholesale distribution
and insurance. She has substantial oversight experience in the areas of finance and law, having served both as a CFO and
General Counsel, advising on strategy, legal compliance and critical regulatory issues such as data privacy, international
operations, workplace safety and environmental impact.
Ms. Blackwell possesses a broad view of
risk management and mitigation. As CFO at Cummins with responsibility for managing economic, financial, operational and
strategic risks, she led improvements in cost structure, positioning the company to achieve more stable earnings and strengthened
the resilience of the overall business model. During her time as CFO, she navigated Cummins through financial distress,
including a review of current assets, deleveraging and improving credit ratings. As CEO of the company’s foundation,
she was responsible for overseeing the company’s broader business impact efforts and community engagement.
During her time as VP of Human Resources
at Cummins, Ms. Blackwell oversaw human capital management of the company’s then ~28,000 employees and helped foster
a culture of performance and development at all levels.
Ms. Blackwell also has a track record as a board member of
successfully overseeing significant, large-scale M&A, including Johnson Controls’ $13.2 billion sale of its Power Solutions business and its pending $8.1 billion sale of its Residential
/ Light Commercial HVAC businesses to Bosch.
PROFESSIONAL HIGHLIGHTS
Cummins (NYSE:CMI) –
a global power technology company
■ CEO of Cummins Foundation and EVP
of Corporate Responsibility (2008 – 2013)
■ EVP and CFO (2003 – 2008)
■ VP, Cummins Business Services (2001 – 2003)
■ VP, Human Resources (1998 – 2001)
■ VP, General Counsel (1997– 1998)
State of Indiana
■ Budget Director (1993 – 1995)
Indiana State Lottery Commission
■ Executive Director (1991 – 1992)
Bose McKinney & Evans LLP –
a full-service business law firm
■ Partner (1985 – 1991; 1995
– 1997)
■ Associate
(1979 - 1984) |
20 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Proposal 1 Election of Directors
Board Nominees for Director
LUIS
FERNANDEZ-MORENO
Interim
President and CEO |

Director
Since: 2016
Age: 62
Current Public Company
Boards:
■ Select Water Solutions (NYSE: WTTR)
(since 2022)
Other Notable Boards/Affiliations:
■ HASA (since 2023)
■ Huber Engineered Materials (since
2019)
■ OQ Chemicals (2018 – 2023)
■ Ascensus Specialties (2017 –
2021)
Education:
■ B.S., Chemical Engineering, Universidad
Iberoamerica
■ Wharton Management Certificate Program, University of Pennsylvania |
KEY BOARD CONTRIBUTIONS
Mr. Fernandez-Moreno currently serves as
interim President and CEO of Ingevity, leveraging his extensive operational experience in the performance materials, chemicals
and coatings industries to drive execution on the Company’s long-term strategy and optimize business performance.
He has been a member of Ingevity’s Board since its spinoff from WestRock in 2016.
During his prior role as President of Ashland’s
$3.5 billion chemical division and his current service on the board of Select Water Solutions, a $1.4 billion provider
of sustainable water and chemical solutions to the energy industry, Mr. Fernandez-Moreno has overseen successful growth
initiatives and developed a deep understanding of business impact and responsible environmental practices, which he leverages
in Board discussions regarding strategies to maximize Ingevity’s stockholder value creation.
As former President of Water Technologies
at Ashland, Mr. Fernandez-Moreno was instrumental in revitalizing the business. He introduced a focus on key growth opportunities
that enhanced customer service and bolstered revenue growth, delivering a 55% increase in EBITDA year over year in 2013,
ultimately resulting in a successful sale of the division for $1.8 billion in 2014. Having held numerous global leadership
roles for large chemical producers in the U.S., Mexico, Brazil, France and the United Kingdom, he has worked to position
complex global businesses for sustainable value creation, developing experience in M&A, joint ventures and divestitures.
Mr. Fernandez-Moreno is expected to step down as interim president and CEO on April 6, 2025 and be succeeded by David H. Li, whose appointment as Ingevity’s next president and CEO will be effective on April 7, 2025.
PROFESSIONAL HIGHLIGHTS
Ingevity Corporation (NYSE:NGVT)
■ Interim President and CEO (since
2024)
Strat and Praxis – a
consulting services company
■ Founder (since 2018)
Ashland (NYSE:ASH) –
a global specialty materials company
■ SVP and President, Chemical Group
(2015 – 2017)
■ President, Ashland Specialty Ingredients
(2013 – 2017)
■ President, Ashland Water Technologies
(2012 – 2013)
Arch Chemicals (previously
publicly traded; NYSE:ARJ) – a manufacturer of water treatment products
■ EVP, HTH Water Products & Wood
Protection (2010 – 2011)
The Dow Chemical Company (NYSE:DOW) –
a leading materials science company
■ VP, Coating Materials (2009 –
2010)
Rohm and Haas (previously publicly
traded; NYSE:ROH) – a U.S. specialty chemicals manufacturer (acquired by Dow Chemical in 2009)
■ Group Vice President, Paint and
Coatings (2005 – 2009) |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
21 |
Table of Contents
Proposal 1 Election of Directors
Board Nominees for Director
DIANE
H. GULYAS
Independent
Director |

Committee Membership:
■ Talent & Compensation (Chair)
■ Nominating & Governance
■ Executive
Director Since: 2019
Age: 68
Current Public Company
Boards:
■ Expeditors International of Washington
(NYSE: EXPD) (since 2015)
Other Notable Boards/Affiliations:
■ W.R.
Grace & Co. (2015 – 2021, until acquisition by Standard Industries)
■ Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals (NYSE:
MNK) (2013 – 2018)
■ International Motors, LLC (formerly
Navistar; previously publicly traded; NYSE: NAV) (2009 – 2012)
■ Viasystems (previously publicly traded;
NASDAQ: VIAS) (2003 – 2009)
Education:
■ B.S., Chemical Engineering, University
of Notre Dame |
KEY BOARD CONTRIBUTIONS
Ms. Gulyas has extensive senior leadership
experience in the chemicals industry, including at DuPont, where she held a variety of executive positions over her 36-year
career with the company. During her tenure, she led three multibillion-dollar growth-oriented businesses, including a
$4 billion business portfolio covering 35 global sites, and served as chair of a $1 billion joint venture with the Japanese
company Teijin, which enables her to provide global markets and industry relevant expertise to the Board.
Ms. Gulyas’ significant experience
in international operations, particularly in Europe and Asia, spans risk oversight, sustainability, global manufacturing
and sales. Her tenure at DuPont also included responsibility for a range of industries relevant to Ingevity’s business,
including specialty chemicals.
She has extensive experience in marketing
and international sales and distribution, having served as the first Chief Marketing Officer at DuPont with responsibilities
for branding, market research, digital marketing and worldwide capacity. This expertise allows her to provide valuable
insights into market trends and go-to-market strategies that impact the Company’s growth and overall performance.
Ms. Gulyas also has a track record of successfully
overseeing transformative M&A, having served on the Board of W.R. Grace & Co. during the company’s $7 billion
sale to Standard Industries.
PROFESSIONAL HIGHLIGHTS
DuPont de Nemours (NYSE:DD) –
a global innovation leader with technology-based materials and solutions
■ President, Performance Polymers (2009
– 2014)
■ Global Chief Marketing and Sales
Officer (2004 – 2006)
■ VP, Electronic and Communication
Technologies Platform (2002 – 2004)
■ VP and General Manager, Advanced
Fiber (1997 – 2002) |
22 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Proposal 1 Election of Directors
Board Nominees for Director
BRUCE
D. HOECHNER
Independent
Director |

Committee Membership:
■ Nominating & Governance (Chair)
■ Talent & Compensation
■ Executive
Director Since: 2023
Age: 65
Current Public Company
Boards:
■ Curtiss-Wright Corporation (NYSE:
CW) (since 2017)
Other Notable Boards/ Affiliations:
■ Director, Rogers Corporation (NYSE:
ROG) (2017 – 2023)
■ Director, Greater Phoenix Economic
Council (2017 – 2022)
Education:
■ B.S., Chemical Engineering, Pennsylvania
State University
■ Wharton Management Certificate Program, University of Pennsylvania |
KEY BOARD CONTRIBUTIONS
Mr. Hoechner is an accomplished senior
executive with more than 40 years of experience delivering exceptional results at high-growth technology-driven global
organizations. His strong financial acumen, as well as his expertise in business strategy development, international marketing
and change management, enable him to contribute valuable perspectives to the Board’s strategy discussions and planning.
As CEO of Rogers Corporation, he successfully
transformed the company into a globally recognized market-driven, innovation-led growth company, driving significant
value creation. Mr. Hoechner built world-class market positions in technologies that enable significant performance improvement
in battery power distribution systems for electric vehicles and neighborhood electric vehicles. He led the execution
of several accretive acquisitions, including DeWAL Industries, which bolstered the company’s innovative
technology applications portfolio and Silicone Engineering, expanding the company’s global footprint.
His manufacturing experience spans domestic
and international regions, including China and Thailand. During his tenure at Rogers, the company expanded Asia operations,
launching numerous manufacturing facilities and innovation centers to further identify break-through solutions instrumental
in driving the company’s value creation strategy.
PROFESSIONAL HIGHLIGHTS
Rogers Corporation (NYSE:ROG) –
a global leader in engineered materials
■ President and CEO (2011 – 2022)
The Dow Chemical Company (NYSE:DOW) –
a materials science company
■ President, Dow Advanced Materials
Division, Asia (2009 – 2011) and Rohm and Haas (previously publicly traded; NYSE:ROH) – a U.S. specialty
chemicals manufacturer (acquired by Dow Chemical in 2009)
■ Corporate VP, General Manager, Paint
and Coatings, Asia (2006 – 2009)
■ Various other roles of increasing
responsibility (1981 – 2006) |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
23 |
Table of Contents
Proposal 1 Election of Directors
Board Nominees for Director
FREDERICK
J. LYNCH
Independent
Director |

Committee Membership:
■ Audit
■ Talent & Compensation
Director Since: 2016
Age: 60
Current Public Company
Boards:
■ N/A
Other Notable Boards/ Affiliations:
■ Nations Roof (since 2024)
■ Verdesian Life Sciences (since 2023)
■ TileBar (since 2023)
■ Window Nation (2021-2022)
■ Traeger Pellet Grills Holdings (NYSE:
COOK) (2020 – 2021)
■ Process Sensing Technologies (2020
–2024)
■ Masonite International Corporation
(previously publicly traded; NYSE: DOOR) (2009 – 2019)
Education:
■ B.S., Chemical Engineering, Villanova
University
■ M.B.A., Fox School of Business, Temple
University |
KEY BOARD CONTRIBUTIONS
Mr. Lynch contributes extensive global
operating experience gained during his leadership career at companies ranging from midsize to Fortune 100 multinational
manufacturing corporations. He brings substantial knowledge of the chemicals industry, manufacturing, supply chain management,
sustainability and strategic planning. He is also an Audit Committee Financial Expert under SEC rules.
During his time as CEO of Masonite International,
Mr. Lynch led transformation initiatives including the innovation of the company’s digital approach and simplifying
and accelerating the customer ordering experience. Under his leadership, Masonite International became a publicly traded
company. During his tenure as CEO, he also oversaw the execution of numerous key portfolio optimization changes
and strategic acquisitions, including the $82 million acquisition of National Hickman and $13 million acquisition of USA
Wood Door. Mr. Lynch also oversaw several additional acquisitions in the UK, which transformed the company’s European
business.
As an operating partner at a private equity
firm, Mr. Lynch focuses on value-driven initiatives to enhance operational performance and develop high-quality
leadership teams. This experience enhances the Board’s oversight of the company’s strategy, human capital
management, senior leadership development and execution.
PROFESSIONAL HIGHLIGHTS
AEA Investors, LP – a
global private investment firm
■ Operating Partner, Middle Market
Private Equity Team (since 2020)
Masonite International (previously
publicly traded; NYSE: DOOR) – a leading global building products manufacturer
■ President and CEO (2006 – 2019)
Alpharma (previously publicly
traded; NYSE:ALO) – a global pharmaceutical company
■ President, Human Generics Division
and SVP, Global Supply Chain (2003 – 2006)
Honeywell International (NASDAQ:HON) –
an aerospace technologies, industrial and building automation, and energy and sustainability solutions
■ VP, Specialty Chemical Business (1999
– 2003)
■ General Manager, Specialty Chemical
Business (1997 – 1999) |
24 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Proposal 1 Election of Directors
Board Nominees for Director
KAREN
G. NARWOLD, NACD.DC
Independent
Director |

Committee Membership:
■ Sustainability & Safety (Chair)
■ Audit
■ Executive
Director Since: 2019
Age: 65
Current Public Company
Boards:
■ Standard Lithium Ltd. (TSXV:SLI) (since 2025)
Other Notable Boards/Affiliations:
■ Directorship Certification, National
Association of Corporate Directors (since 2024)
Education:
■ B.A., Political Science, University
of Connecticut
■ J.D., University of Connecticut School
of Law |
KEY BOARD CONTRIBUTIONS
Ms. Narwold brings over 30 years of executive
leadership experience with chemicals and multinational industrial manufacturing companies to the Board, including her
service as Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel at several public companies. Her areas of expertise include
law, corporate governance, ethics and compliance, sustainability, government and regulatory affairs, human capital management,
risk oversight, strategic planning, change management, M&A and cybersecurity.
Over her 13 years at Albemarle, Ms. Narwold
guided the reengineering of the company’s legal department and compliance program, and restructured its external
affairs organization to align with the operational needs of its global business units. Her leadership also supported the
successful $6.2 billion acquisition of Rockwood Holdings, which elevated Albemarle to one of the leading lithium manufacturers
in the world. Following the acquisition, Ms. Narwold guided the company through a digital transformation and overhaul
of the global IT department to support the exponential growth.
With her significant experience in executive
legal and operational roles in the global industrial manufacturing industry, she has developed deep insights into low-impact
manufacturing, clean energy and workplace safety, as well as expertise in sustainability with a focus on leveraging best-in-class
benchmarking to drive corporate accountability and reporting.
PROFESSIONAL HIGHLIGHTS
Albemarle Corporation (NYSE:ALB) –
a specialty chemicals manufacturing company
■ EVP, CAO (2016 – 2023)
■ SVP, General Counsel, Corporate and
Government Affairs, Corporate Secretary (2013 – 2016)
■ SVP, General Counsel and Corporate
Secretary (2010 – 2013)
Barzel Industries (previously
publicly traded; NASDAQ:TONS) – a metal processing and distribution company manufacturing steel for industrial
and construction use
■ VP, Strategic Counsel, Chief Administrative
Officer (2008 – 2010)
Symmetry Holdings (previously
traded; AMEX:SHJ) – a company focused on acquiring industrial, asset-based businesses
■ VP, General Counsel (2007 –
2008)
GrafTech International Ltd. (NYSE:EAF) –
a manufacturer of graphite electrodes and petroleum coke
■ VP, General Counsel, Human Resources
and Corporate Secretary (1990 – 2006) |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
25 |
Table of Contents
Proposal 1 Election of Directors
Board Nominees for Director
DANIEL
F. SANSONE
Independent
Director |

Committee Membership:
■ Audit (Chair)
■ Talent & Compensation
■ Executive
Director Since: 2016
Age: 72
Current Public Company
Boards:
■ AdvanSix (NYSE: ASIX) (since 2016)
Other Notable Boards/Affiliations:
■ Vulcan Materials Company (NYSE: VMC)
(2005 – 2014)
Education:
■ B.S., Finance, John Carroll University
■ M.B.A., Illinois Institute of Technology |
KEY BOARD CONTRIBUTIONS
Mr. Sansone is a seasoned executive with
four decades of domestic and international experience in financial and general management at major public corporations,
including as CFO of Vulcan Materials Company, the largest construction aggregate and materials producer. His deep knowledge
of capital allocation strategies and experience leading a significant business division at Vulcan Materials bolster the
Board’s oversight and execution of Ingevity’s financial and operational initiatives. He also brings expertise
in the asphalt and paving markets.
He possesses significant M&A expertise,
having supported a number of acquisitions and opportunistic divestitures throughout his career. This includes Vulcan Materials’
$4.6 billion acquisition of Florida Rock, which significantly expanded the company’s footprint, as well as a subsequent
divestiture of non-core assets raising more than $1 billion.
Mr. Sansone’s roles at Tenneco and
FMC Corporation provide him with international expertise in financial analysis and reporting, supported by his experience
working in the highly regulated construction materials industry, where he learned to navigate environmental
compliance issues, permitting processes and changes in regulation. Mr. Sansone qualifies as an Audit Committee financial
expert under SEC rules.
PROFESSIONAL HIGHLIGHTS
Vulcan Materials Company (NYSE:VMC)
– a leading producer of construction materials
■ EVP and CFO (2011 – 2014)
■ SVP and CFO (2005 – 2011)
■ President, Southern and Gulf Coast
Division (1997 – 2005)
Tenneco (previously traded;
NYSE: TEN) – an auto parts supplier (taken private by Apollo Global Management in 2022)
■ Director of Finance, Europe (1986 – 1988)
FMC Corporation (NYSE:FMC) –
an agricultural sciences company
■ International Controller (1978 – 1986) |
26 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Proposal 1 Election of Directors
Board Nominees for Director
J.
KEVIN WILLIS
Independent
Director |

Committee Membership:
■ Audit
■ Sustainability & Safety
Director Since: 2024
Age: 59
Current Public Company
Boards:
■ N/A
Notable Boards/Affiliations:
■ AppHarvest (OTC: APPHQ) (2022 – 2023)
Education:
■ B.S., Accounting, Eastern Kentucky
University
■ M.B.A., Kellogg Graduate School of
Management at Northwestern University |
KEY BOARD CONTRIBUTIONS
Mr. Willis is a financial leader with an
over 37-year tenure at Ashland Global, a global additives and specialty ingredients company, where he currently oversees
all aspects of the corporate finance organization, including financial reporting, tax, strategic planning and financial
risk analysis. His expertise in accounting principles and reporting requirements qualifies him as an audit committee expert
under SEC rules.
Over the course of his career, he has had
an integral role in shaping value-creating strategies through returns-driven capital allocation planning, operating efficiencies
initiatives and business portfolio separations, including Ashland’s successful $3.9 billion separation from Valvoline.
He is currently a member of Ashland’s executive committee, where he shares overall responsibility for setting Ashland’s
global strategy, managing capital and upholding operating principles. This experience allows him to contribute to the
Board’s oversight of value creation and capital allocation strategies.
Mr. Willis brings substantial M&A execution
experience to the Board. As CFO of Ashland, he has directly overseen a number of large scale transactions, including Ashland’s
spinoff of its Valvoline stake, $1.8 billion sale of its water technologies business to Clayton, Dublier & Rice and
$1.7 billion sale of its Performance Adhesives business to Arkema.
Spending nearly three years in the Netherlands,
he helped lead Ashland’s effort to standardize processes and implement accounting and other administrative shared services
across European operations, improving regulatory compliance and risk mitigation and ensuring data consistency, leading
to more effective decision making.
PROFESSIONAL HIGHLIGHTS
Ashland (NYSE: ASH) –
a global specialty materials company
■ VP and CFO (2013 – Present)
■ VP, Finance and Controller for Ashland
Specialty Ingredients (2011 – 2013)
■ VP and Treasurer (2007 – 2011)
■ General Auditor (2004 – 2007) |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
27 |
Table of Contents
Proposal 1 Election of Directors
Board Nominees for Director
BENJAMIN
G. (SHON) WRIGHT
Independent
Director |

Committee Membership:
■ Audit
■ Sustainability & Safety
Director Since: 2022
Age: 50
Current Public Company
Boards:
■ N/A
Notable Boards/Affiliations:
■ Scania Cummins, a Cummins joint venture
(since 2022)
■ Wuxi Vane Wheel Engineering Company,
a Cummins joint venture based in China (since 2017)
■ Nuss Truck and Equipment (2013-2023)
Education:
■ B.S., Chemical Engineering, University
of South Carolina
■ M.B.A., Harvard Business School
■ Cybersecurity Oversight Certification, Carnegie Mellon University’s Software Engineering Institute |
KEY QUALIFICATIONS
Mr. Wright, an accomplished international
business executive with a proven track record of success brings nearly thirty years of expertise in strategy, operations,
sales and marketing. With a dynamic background spanning multiple business segments in the chemical, automotive, and industrial
manufacturing industries and notable achievements in executive roles, he offers valuable insights into strategic planning,
international operations, supply chain management, and risk management. His multinational industrial and expat expertise
includes production and logistics management in South Africa, India, Western Europe and China providing a critical global
perspective to Board discussion on Ingevity’s global operations in over 30 countries.
Throughout his tenure at Cummins, Mr. Wright
has had full P&L responsibility for significant business segments, including his role as President of Components and
Software, where he led a $2.5 billion business with 8,000 employees and 17 manufacturing sites. During his tenure, he
oversaw expansions, such as the $20 million refurbishment of U.K. facilities, a $25 million expansion in Charleston, SC,
and a $15 million expansion in Wuxi, China, driving a 60% growth in the global turbocharger business. Mr. Wright also
managed the integration of Cummins’ $325 million acquisition of Jacobs Vehicle Systems (JVS), creating new growth
and technical opportunities. Effective March 15th, Mr. Wright was promoted to Vice President and President of Distribution
Business, with full P&L responsibility for an $11 billion business with over 14,000 employees in 190 countries. In
this role, he will focus on delivering sales and service support, investing in employee development, advancing safety
performance, and improving operational performance. His commitment to excellence and a strategic vision for sustainable
growth positions him as a valuable asset on the Ingevity board, driving informed decision making and fostering long term
success.
PROFESSIONAL HIGHLIGHTS
Cummins (NYSE:CMI) –
a global power technology company
■ VP and President, Distribution Business
(since 2025)
■ VP, Cummins and President, Cummins
Components and Software (2024-2025)
■ VP, Cummins and President, Cummins
Engine Components (2022 – 2024)
■ VP, Cummins and President, Cummins
Turbo Technologies (2017 – 2022)
■ Executive Director and General Manager,
Americas (2014 – 2017)
■ Director, Mobile Generators (2011
– 2014)
■ Director, Global Parts (2009 –
2011)
■ Plant Manager, South Africa (2006
– 2009)
■ Director, Global Sourcing (2005 –
2006)
■ Manager, Strategic Planning (2004
– 2005)
British Petroleum (NYSE:BP) –
a leading multinational oil and gas company
■ Operations Services Manager (1997
– 2002) |
28 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Proposal 1 Election of
Directors
Summary of the Board Nominees’ Skills
and Experience
Summary of the Board Nominees’
Skills and Experience
The Board nominees
consist of a diverse group of respected leaders who possess the requisite skills, experience and character to effectively oversee Ingevity’s
evolving needs and strategy. The following chart summarizes the core competencies that the Board considers valuable for effective governance
and oversight and illustrates how the current Board members individually and collectively represent these key competencies.
Skill/Experience |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Industry or Market Experience |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
C-Suite Experience |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Other Public Company Board Experience |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
International Manufacturing Experience (P&L) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Executive Compensation/Human Capital Management |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
SEC Financial Expert* |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Substantial M&A/Joint Venture Experience |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Compliance/Legal Experience |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
Environmental, Safety & Sustainability Experience |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Cybersecurity Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
Risk Management |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
* |
While each of Ms. Blackwell and Mr. Hoechner meet the qualifications
of an audit committee financial expert under the SEC rules, neither of them presently serves on the Audit Committee or are formally
designated as an audit committee financial expert for the Company. |
In addition, many of our directors have
experience as members of non-profit, academic and philanthropic institutions, which is aligned with our sustainability goal to make a
positive impact in the communities where we operate, and adds additional perspective to their roles at Ingevity.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
29 |
Table of Contents
Board and Corporate Governance Matters
Role of the Board of Directors
The Board is responsible for overseeing
and providing guidance on the Company’s strategy, business and performance, and protecting stockholder interests and value. In
addition, the Board is responsible for appointing, overseeing and evaluating the executive officers who manage the Company’s day-to-day
operations. The Board oversees management’s activities to ensure that the Company’s assets are properly safeguarded; that
the Company maintains appropriate financial and other internal controls; and that the Company complies with responsible corporate governance
practices, and applicable laws, regulations and ethical standards. One of the Board’s most important functions is oversight of
risk management. This is discussed further below under the section titled “Board’s role in risk oversight.”
The Board actively oversees the development
and execution of our strategies, including those related to business, operations and finance, as well as strategies focused on legal
and regulatory matters, corporate responsibility and sustainability, stockholder engagement, innovation and protection of intellectual
property, cybersecurity, talent development and executive succession.
In carrying out its responsibilities, the
Board has created, and delegated responsibilities to, five fully independent committees:
|
■ |
The Audit Committee; |
|
■ |
The Talent and Compensation Committee (the “T&C Committee”); |
|
■ |
The Nominating and Governance Committee; |
|
■ |
The Sustainability and Safety Committee; and |
|
■ |
The Executive Committee. |
Each committee’s responsibilities
are described under “Committees of our Board of Directors.”
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Board is committed to sound corporate
governance policies and practices that are designed to enable Ingevity to operate responsibly and with integrity, to compete effectively,
to sustain its business and to build long-term stockholder value. Our Board-approved Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Guidelines”)
are available on our website at https://ir.ingevity.com/corporate-governance/corporate-governance-documents.
The Guidelines form a transparent framework
for the effective governance of Ingevity, addressing matters such as the respective roles and responsibilities of the Board and management,
the Board’s leadership structure, director independence and Board and committee membership criteria. The Guidelines are reviewed
at least annually by the Nominating & Governance Committee in light of changing regulations, evolving best practices and other
governance developments.
30 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Board
and Corporate Governance Matters
Board Leadership Structure
Board Leadership Structure
Our Board regularly reviews its leadership
structure, how the structure is functioning, and whether the structure continues to be in the best interest of our stockholders. The
Company’s current Board leadership structure consists of the following:

|
Main Responsibilities:
■ Presides over Board and stockholder meetings
■ Provides advice and counsel to CEO
■ Acts as liaison between independent directors and CEO
■ Provides input to the T&C and Nominating & Governance Committees regarding the annual CEO performance evaluation,
Board evaluation, and succession planning
■ Chairs the Executive Committee |
|
|

|
Main Responsibilities:
■ Manages Ingevity’s day-to-day business and operations
■ Manages and develops Ingevity’s executive leadership team
■ Ensures proper execution of Ingevity’s corporate strategy |
Our Guidelines do not contain a firm policy
regarding separation of the offices of CEO and Chair. Instead, the Guidelines give the Board flexibility to make the determination that
is in the best interests of the stockholders based on applicable circumstances at the time of the decision. Except in connection with
a leadership transition in 2020, the Company has always separated the roles of Chair and CEO. The Board believes that separating the
positions of CEO and Chair allows for clear delineation of the role of the Chair and minimizes duplication of effort between the CEO
and the Chair. The separation of roles also allows the CEO to focus on executing Ingevity’s strategic plan and managing its operations
and performance, and facilitates effective oversight by the Chair and improved communications and relations between the Board, the CEO,
and other senior leaders of the Company.
The Guidelines provide that if the Chair
is not independent, the Board must appoint a Lead Independent Director. During the leadership transition in 2020, Mr. Lynch served as
the Lead Independent Director. Because the Chair is independent, there is no need to appoint a Lead Independent Director.
Ms. Blackwell has served as independent
Chair of the Board since February 2021. Our Board Chair is elected to serve a two-year term, unless otherwise determined by the Board.
Upon the recommendation of the Nominating & Governance Committee and following its own review, the Board elected Ms. Blackwell
in February 2023 to continue her service as Board Chair for another two-year term. In February 2025, the Board voted to extend Ms. Blackwell’s
term as Board Chair to end as of the end of day on the date of the Company’s 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders upon the recommendation
of the Nominating & Governance Committee to have the Board Chair commence his or her term when the Board is newly elected. A
new Board Chair will be elected at the Board’s meeting in April 2025 to serve a two-year term ending as of the end of day on the
date of the Company’s 2027 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. In October 2024, the Board implemented a limit on service as Board Chair
to two successive two-year terms unless the Board determines that it is in the best interests of the Company’s stockholders to
make an exception.
Mr. Fernandez-Moreno became Interim President &
Chief Executive Officer on October 2, 2024 following the departure of John Fortson from the Company. On March 10, 2025, the Company announced that its Board has appointed David H. Li as the Company’s president and CEO, effective as of April 7, 2025.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
31 |
Table of Contents
Board and Corporate Governance
Matters
Committees of our Board of Directors
Committees of our Board
of Directors
Our Board has established five standing
committees to help the Board fulfill its responsibilities. Committee members are elected annually by the Board based on the recommendations
of the Nominating & Governance Committee. Each committee operates under a charter, all of which are available at https://ir.ingevity.com/corporate-governance/corporate-governance-documents.
The Board has determined that each member
of its standing committees is independent under the relevant SEC and New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) standards, including
the heightened independence standards required for members of audit and compensation committees. For more information on independence
standards, see “Director independence.”
AUDIT COMMITTEE |
|
2024
Meetings: 9
Average attendance in 2024: 98% |
CHAIR

Daniel F. Sansone* |
MEMBERS
Frederick J. Lynch*
Karen G. Narwold
J. Kevin Willis*
Benjamin G. (Shon) Wright
*Audit Committee Financial Expert |
|
PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES:
1. Assist the Board with overseeing the integrity of the Company’s financial statements;
2. Review management’s assessments and reports relating to the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting;
3. Appoint, oversee, and evaluate the qualifications, performance, and independence of the independent
auditor;
4. Oversee and evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s internal audit function;
5. Review and discuss any critical audit matter addressed in the audit and relevant financials with the
internal auditor;
6. Review the overall adequacy and effectiveness of the Company’s legal, regulatory, and ethics and
compliance programs;
7. Review significant legal, compliance, or regulatory matters; and
8. Review the Company’s financial risk exposures and mitigating actions. |
ADDITIONAL GOVERNANCE MATTERS:
The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is independent in accordance with the heightened independence standards established by the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and adopted by the NYSE for audit committee members. The Board has also determined that each Audit Committee member is financially literate, as such qualification is interpreted by the Board in its business judgement, and that each of Messrs. Lynch, Sansone and Willis is an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC rules. No member of our Audit Committee serves on the audit committee of more than three public companies. The Audit Committee’s report for December 31, 2024, appears under “Audit Committee Report.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
TALENT AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE |
|
2024
Meetings: 10
Average attendance in 2024: 96% |
CHAIR

Diane H. Gulyas |
MEMBERS
Jean S. Blackwell
Bruce D. Hoechner
Frederick J. Lynch
Daniel F. Sansone |
|
PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES:
1. Evaluate the CEO’s performance and determine the CEO’s compensation based on such evaluation;
2. Review and approve the compensation of other executive officers;
3. Review and recommend to the Board for its approval non-employee director compensation;
4. Administer the Company’s equity and other compensation plans and programs;
5. Review and make recommendations to the Board with respect to talent development and succession planning,
diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging programs, employee engagement initiatives, and corporate culture; and
6. Review incentive compensation arrangements to confirm that incentive pay aligns with Company goals and
outcomes and does not encourage inappropriate risk-taking. |
ADDITIONAL GOVERNANCE MATTERS:
The Board has determined that each member of the T&C Committee is (i) an “outside director” under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (the “Code”) and (ii) a “non-employee director” under Section 16b-3(b)(3)(i) promulgated under the Exchange Act.
The T&C Committee’s report for December 31, 2024, appears under “Talent and Compensation Committee Report.”
|
|
32 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Board and Corporate Governance
Matters
Committees of our Board of Directors
NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE |
|
2024
Meetings: 6
Average attendance in 2024: 100% |
CHAIR

Bruce D. Hoechner |
MEMBERS
Jean S. Blackwell
Diane H. Gulyas |
|
PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES:
1. Identify individuals qualified to become Board members and recommend nominees for election to the Board;
2. Make recommendations to our Board concerning the composition and needs of the Board and its committees;
3. Maintain a Board succession plan;
4. Advise our Board on corporate governance matters;
5. Oversee the annual Board and committee self-evaluation process; and
6. Review related party transactions.
|
ADDITIONAL GOVERNANCE MATTERS:
Luis Fernandez-Moreno served on the Nominating and Governance Committee as its chair until his appointment as Interim President &
CEO of the Company on October 2, 2024. Bruce Hoechner was appointed chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee effective
October 2, 2024.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSTAINABILITY AND SAFETY COMMITTEE |
|
2024
Meetings: 6
Average attendance in 2024: 100% |
CHAIR

Karen G. Narwold |
MEMBERS
J. Kevin Willis
Benjamin G. (Shon) Wright |
|
PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES:
1. Oversee and review Ingevity’s integration of environmental and corporate social responsibility
principles into its business strategy and decision making;
2. Oversee and review Ingevity’s environmental health program and its policies and procedures, and
monitor performance with respect to environmental health, including monitoring progress against goals and program objectives;
3. Oversee and review the periodic sustainability materiality assessment refreshes and the impact on the Company’s sustainability priorities;
4. Oversee and review the Company’s policies, procedures, and performance relating to matters affecting
certain aspects of its corporate social responsibility initiatives, including community engagement and community giving;
5. Review Ingevity’s annual Sustainability Report;
6. Oversee and review Ingevity’s policies, procedures, and monitor performance relating to matters
affecting employee, public, process, and product safety; and
7. Oversee and review the Company’s cybersecurity program
and its policies and procedures, and monitor performance relating to matters affecting cybersecurity risk exposure and mitigation. |
ADDITIONAL GOVERNANCE MATTERS:
Luis Fernandez-Moreno served on the Sustainability and Safety Committee until his appointment as Interim President &
CEO of the Company on October 2, 2024.
In 2024, the responsibilities of the Sustainability & Safety Committee were expanded to include oversight of cybersecurity
risk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE |
|
2024
Meetings: 0 |
CHAIR

Jean S. Blackwell |
MEMBERS
Diane H. Gulyas
Bruce D. Hoechner
Karen G. Narwold
Daniel F. Sansone |
|
PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS:
The Executive Committee is authorized to exercise certain powers of the Board not otherwise prohibited by law or Ingevity’s
Guidelines or governing documents between Board meetings when a meeting of the full Board is impractical or not warranted under the
circumstances. |
Each of the Audit Committee, T&C Committee,
Nominating & Governance Committee, and Sustainability & Safety Committee is responsible for annually reviewing their
charter and performance. The Nominating & Governance Committee further reviews each of the committee charters annually, including
the Executive Committee charter.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
33 |
Table of Contents
Board
and Corporate Governance Matters
Director Nominees and Selection
Director Nominees and Selection
The Board strives
to select as director candidates a mix of individuals with experience at policy-making levels in substantive areas that are relevant
to the Company’s activities, as well as other characteristics that will contribute to the overall ability of the Board to perform
its duties and meet changing conditions.
The Nominating &
Governance Committee is responsible for evaluating and recommending qualified director candidates to the Board for its consideration.
In evaluating potential director nominees, the Nominating & Governance Committee considers the following, among other things:
|
n |
relevant
industry experience, including international manufacturing; |
|
n |
experience with mergers
and acquisitions and other strategic transactions; |
|
n |
talent management experience; |
|
n |
independence and other
related requirements for service on committees; |
|
n |
the number of public
company boards on which the nominee serves; |
|
n |
conflicts of interest
and other legal and ethical issues that would interfere with the proper performance of the responsibilities of a director (recognizing
that some directors may also be executive officers of the Company); |
|
n |
the nominee’s commitment
to discharging the duties of a director in accordance with the Guidelines and applicable law and to serving on the Board for an extended
period of time; |
|
n |
the nominee’s available
time and energy to carry out his or her duties effectively; |
|
n |
experience that would
enable the nominee to meaningfully participate in deliberations of the Board and committees and to otherwise fulfill his or her duties;
and |
|
n |
whether the nominee will
enhance the diversity of the Board based on his or her personal educational and professional background, experience, viewpoints or perspectives. |
In addition, the
Nominating & Governance Committee considers character, financial literacy, and relevant skills in light of the Board’s
needs.
The Nominating &
Governance Committee considers recommendations for director candidates from Board members, stockholders, and other third parties, such
as search firms, that are regularly engaged to assist with identifying candidates. The Nominating & Governance Committee evaluates candidates recommended by
stockholders using the same criteria it uses for all other candidates. Any stockholder wishing to recommend a director candidate should
provide the Nominating & Governance Committee with the information required by the Company’s Bylaws to be provided with respect
to director nominees submitted by stockholders. For more information, see “Questions and Answers Regarding Stockholder Communications,
Stockholder Proposals, and Company Documents.”
Board Refreshment and Succession Planning
The Board believes
that periodic refreshment of its directors is vital to ensuring that the Board remains current and reflects a diversity of skills, professional
experience and backgrounds. In order to encourage refreshment, the Board recently adopted a mandatory director retirement age of 72 and
a mandatory term limit on its Board chair of no more than two successive two-year terms, in each case, unless the Board determines that
it is in the best interests of the Company’s stockholders to make an exception.
Since 2022, the Board has added three new independent directors.
In December 2024, the Board appointed a new independent director, J. Kevin Willis, who was vetted
by a third-party search firm, the Nominating & Governance Committee and the Board.
The Nominating and
Governance Committee actively engages in succession planning for the Board at least annually and more frequently as the situation warrants.
The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews the skills and experience of the Board to identify opportunities to recruit directors
that enhance areas of focus. In selecting Mr. Willis, the Nominating & Governance Committee and the Board focused on adding additional
financial expertise from a sitting chief financial officer with particular expertise in capital management and driving business transformation
in the specialty chemicals sector.
Director
independence
Our Guidelines and
the NYSE require that a majority of our directors be independent under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the general
listing standards of the NYSE. Our Board, with the assistance of the Nominating & Governance Committee, annually (or more frequently
if circumstances require) assesses the independence of each director.
34 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Board
and Corporate Governance Matters
Evaluating Board performance and effectiveness
In conducting its
independence assessment, the Board reviews all relevant facts and circumstances, including each nominee’s affiliations and relationships,
potential conflicts of interest, and all specific criteria included in the NYSE’s general listing standards. An independent director
is a director who our Board affirmatively determines has no material relationship with the Company (either directly or as a partner,
stockholder, or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company) other than in connection with his or her role as
a director.
In February 2025,
the Nominating & Governance Committee and Board conducted their review of each nominee’s affiliations that are relevant to
independence. These affiliations were provided by the nominees in their responses to D&O questionnaires distributed by the Company
in December 2024. Once the Company received the list of affiliations, it conducted additional diligence on each relationship and ran
searches against the Company’s books and records to determine whether any financial transactions existed with the affiliates. Results
of the diligence and searches were reported to the Nominating & Governance Committee and the Board.
After reviewing the
affiliations and report described above, upon the recommendation of the Nominating & Governance Committee, the Board affirmatively
determined that all director nominees other than Mr. Fernandez-Moreno (Ingevity’s Interim President and CEO) are independent in
accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the general listing standards of the NYSE. Upon Mr. Fernandez-Moreno’s reelection as a director and the conclusion of his service as interim president and CEO, the Board will again assess the independence of Mr. Fernandez-Moreno under NYSE rules. NYSE standards state that service as an interim CEO or other executive officer shall not disqualify a director from being considered independent following that employment.
Evaluating Board performance and effectiveness
The Nominating &
Governance Committee assists the Board in annually assessing the effectiveness of the Board, its committees, and each director in carrying
out their respective roles, as described below.
Format |
|
Topics |
|
Presentation
of Findings |
|
Feedback
Incorporated |
The Nominating & Governance Committee determines the format of the
evaluations, and annually considers the effectiveness of the evaluation process. Under the current process, each director completes
a written questionnaire to provide feedback on various aspects of the Board and the committees on which such director serves, and
to provide general feedback on each director. The chair of the Nominating & Governance Committee then reviews each questionnaire
with the director who completed it to ensure the feedback given is well understood and to ensure that each director is given the
opportunity to provide candid and comprehensive feedback. |
|
Evaluation
topics generally include, among other matters:
n Board
composition and structure;
n Board
culture;
n Information
flow and processes;
n Board
oversight of risk management and strategic planning;
n Compliance
and ethics program effectiveness;
n Succession
planning;
n Access
to management; and
n Individual
director effectiveness. |
|
The Nominating & Governance Committee evaluates the findings and
then presents to the Board and each committee chair the results of the evaluations. The Board and committees discuss the results
to identify opportunities to enhance effectiveness. |
|
The Board and/or committees implement enhancements and other modifications
to their respective policies and procedures as appropriate. |
Examples of actions
the Board has taken in recent years in response to the annual evaluation process include:
n |
assigning oversight of cybersecurity risk management to the Sustainability & Safety
Committee; |
n |
devoting additional agenda time for open discussion; |
n |
assigning oversight of matters relating to the attraction, development, and retention of the Company’s
leadership to the T&C Committee; and |
n |
modifying committee meeting content and length to reflect input from committee members. |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
35 |
Table of Contents
Board and Corporate Governance Matters
Board meetings and executive sessions
Board meetings and executive sessions
Our Board meets on
a regularly scheduled basis during the year to review significant developments affecting Ingevity and to act on matters requiring Board
approval. The Board may hold special meetings between scheduled Board meetings when appropriate.
The Board met twelve
times during 2024. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the number of meetings of the Board held during the period
he or she was a director and (ii) the number of meetings of all committees of the Board held during the period he or she served on such
committees. All directors attended the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Our Guidelines require
that the non-management members of our Board meet in executive session without management present at each regularly scheduled Board meeting.
Likewise, our committees generally meet in executive session without management present at each regularly scheduled committee meeting.
Board’s role in risk oversight
The Board, acting
as a full Board and through its committees, oversees risk management on behalf of the Company. Our Board recognizes the importance of
effective risk management in running successful business operations and believes it has effective processes in place to identify and
monitor potential material risks facing the Company and to oversee the Company’s aggregate risk profile.
Ingevity’s
enterprise risk management (“ERM”) process helps management and the Board identify, prioritize and manage risks that have
the potential to present the most significant obstacles to achieving the Company’s business objectives or that otherwise present
significant risk to the Company. Key leaders across the business in various functions work together to identify the major risks faced
by the Company and its businesses. At least annually, the Company’s management and Board review the major risks identified through
the Company’s ERM process along with risk mitigation plans and at least quarterly, the Company’s management updates the Board
on the status of top risks. The ERM process is regularly refreshed to adequately address the overall risk environment and tailor the
Company’s priorities and mitigation plans accordingly. Management reports regularly to the Board regarding material changes or
developments.
Set forth below are
key areas of risk overseen by the Board, directly or through its committees.
Legal, compliance, and regulatory
risks
Our Board, both directly
and through the Audit Committee, receives regular updates on various legal, compliance and regulatory matters, such as developments in
litigation, compliance risks and our compliance programs. In addition, regular updates provided to the Audit Committee by our General
Counsel and internal audit function provide insight into our risk assessment and risk management policies and processes.
Financial and accounting risks
The Audit Committee
oversees the management of financial, accounting, internal controls, and liquidity risks. This oversight includes interaction at Audit
Committee meetings with the Chief Financial Officer; management from our financial, accounting, internal audit, and treasury functions;
and representatives from our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also discusses with management our major
financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor, control and remediate such exposure.
Governance risks
The Nominating &
Governance Committee oversees risks related to Board organization, Board membership (including director refreshment and succession),
Board structure and other corporate governance matters.
Executive compensation program risks
The T&C Committee
assists our Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks arising from our compensation
policies and programs and with respect to succession planning for key management. For more information, see “Compensation Discussion
and Analysis.”
36 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Board and Corporate
Governance Matters
Board’s role in risk oversight
Cybersecurity risks
In 2024, upon the
recommendation of the Nominating & Governance Committee, the Board expanded the Sustainability & Safety Committee’s responsibilities
to include oversight of cybersecurity risk to allow for more in-depth reviews. As part of its oversight of cybersecurity risk, the Sustainability & Safety Committee receives updates at least quarterly from the Company’s Chief Information Security Officer and other management.
Cybersecurity risk management is also integrated into our broader enterprise risk management program to ensure that cybersecurity matters
are considered, and our IT department is consulted, during key business decisions that we make. In addition to the oversight provided
by the Sustainability & Safety Committee, management provides an update to the full Board on matters pertaining to cybersecurity
at least annually, including updates given by third-party cybersecurity experts on the risk landscape generally.
Sustainability risks
The Sustainability & Safety Committee oversees and reviews certain aspects of our sustainability programs, including environmental health and corporate
social responsibility in addition to having oversight of people, product and process safety risk. This scope includes oversight of climate
risk. In addition to the reviews completed by the Sustainability & Safety Committee, Ingevity’s management also presents on
sustainability matters to the full Board at least once annually.
As shown below, although
the Sustainability & Safety Committee has primary responsibility for certain sustainability matters, other committees, and occasionally
the full Board, oversee specific sustainability-related matters.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
37 |
Table of Contents
Board and Corporate Governance Matters
Board’s role in risk oversight
Sustainability
Report/
Other Area for Review |
|
|
|
Committee |
|
Item Description |
|
BoD |
S&S |
|
N&G |
Audit |
|
T&C |
Commitment
to
Sustainability |
|
Sustainability Rating Agencies, Reporting and Sustainability Groups |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sustainability Materiality Refresh |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goal Setting and Tracking Progress |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Sustainability Report |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacture
Responsibly |
|
Responsible Care Policy/Program |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental Health |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prioritize
People |
|
Employee Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Safety |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal/Employee Safety |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process Safety |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public Safety/Environmental Health |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emergency Response and Crisis Communication Plans |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Culture of Inclusion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Talent Attraction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Compensation and Talent Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Employee Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Health and Wellness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Corporate Social Responsibility |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Engagement/IngeviCares/Philanthropic Giving |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pursue
Excellence |
|
Commitment to Integrity and Ethical Behavior |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compliance &
Ethics – Program Effectiveness, Complaints, Investigations, Financial Related Concerns |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Code of Conduct |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Supplier Principles of Conduct |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cybersecurity |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intellectual Property |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Performance |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Governance |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Embrace
Innovation |
|
Business and Segment Innovation |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
Emerging Issues, regulations in Sustainability and Safety |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alignment of sustainability and safety programs to company strategy |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Risk Management |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
Our latest Sustainability
Report and other information regarding our related initiatives and progress are available on our website at https://www.ingevity.com/about/sustainability.
38 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Board and Corporate
Governance Matters
Management development and succession planning
Management development and succession
planning
One of our Board’s
most critical functions is executive succession planning, which is reviewed at least once annually and more often as needed. The T&C
Committee, which has the primary responsibility for overseeing the development of succession plans for all of our executive officers,
regularly discusses succession in collaboration with our CEO and Chief Human Resources Officer (“CHRO”), and reports on the
discussions to the Board. On March 10, 2025, the Company announced that its Board has appointed David H. Li as the Company’s president and CEO, effective as of April 7, 2025.
Board oversight of human capital matters
Under its charter,
the T&C Committee is responsible for overseeing and reviewing Ingevity’s policies and programs related to diversity, equity,
inclusion & belonging (DEIB), and human capital matters, including employee engagement initiatives. The T&C Committee receives
periodic updates from management on, and discusses, the Company’s DEIB vision and strategy. At least once a year, the T&C Committee
reviews matters related to the Company’s culture, including benefits offered, talent development, and workforce priorities. The
T&C Committee also receives updates on the Company’s implementation of the IngeviWay, a framework which sets forth our purpose,
vision and values and guides our behaviors and decision-making, to ensure alignment.
Additional information regarding human capital matters
is available on our website at https://www.ingevity.com.
Director education program
Each director receives
educational information about the Company and expectations of their role as part of an orientation upon joining the Board. Once on the
Board, directors participate in an ongoing education program that incorporates site visits; management presentations; presentations by
the Company’s independent auditors, investment banks and internal and external legal counsel; third-party expert speakers on various
topics; and the distribution of analyst reports and pertinent articles on the Company’s business and industry. The Nominating &
Governance Committee annually reviews the Board education program and recommends changes that it deems appropriate.
Retirement age, term limits and significant
change in job responsibilities
Under our Guidelines,
a director may not stand for re-election for any service year after such director turns 72 in the interest of facilitating Board refreshment.
The Board will determine on a case-by-case basis whether to grant an exception to this limitation taking into account such factors as
the then current needs of the Board and any particular expertise or unique attributes of the director. Subsequent to the 2024 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, Mr. Sansone reached the age of 72. After review, the Board determined that it is in the best interest of the
Company and its stockholders that Mr. Sansone serve an additional term given his in depth knowledge of the Company and its industry and
to allow for an orderly transition of leadership of the Audit Committee.
The Board has not
established a policy enforcing a term limit because it believes that, on balance, such a policy would sacrifice the contribution of directors
who have been able to develop, over a period of time, extensive insight into the Company and its operations. The Board annually evaluates
each director’s contributions during the Board and committee evaluation process.
Our Guidelines require
any director who has a significant change in his or her full-time job responsibilities to submit a resignation. The Board then considers
whether to accept any such resignation taking into account all relevant factors.
Overboarding policy
The Guidelines provide
that independent directors generally may not serve on more than five public company boards (including Ingevity’s Board). However,
a director who is actively employed as a CEO of a public company may not serve on more than three public company boards (including Ingevity’s
Board), and a director who serves as an officer (other than CEO) at another public company may not serve on more than four public company
boards (including Ingevity’s Board).
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
39 |
Table of Contents
Board and Corporate Governance Matters
Stockholder outreach and engagement
Stockholder outreach and engagement
We value and are
committed to regular, meaningful engagement with our stockholders and other stakeholders, including customers, suppliers, employees and
our communities. In 2024, we engaged with stockholders and potential stockholders 252 times via in-person meetings and phone and video
calls where we discussed a variety of topics, including capital allocation and leverage, portfolio review, key raw material costs, financial
results, and the CEO transition. Senior leadership participated in approximately 70% of these engagements.
|
 |
100+
MEETINGS WITH
STOCKHOLDERS
AT CONFERENCES
AND ROADSHOWS |
|
|
 |
147
OTHER CALLS AND
MEETINGS WITH
STOCKHOLDERS |
In 2024, we also
attended 14 conferences/roadshows hosted by analysts resulting in over 100 meetings with stockholders or potential stockholders. We also
broadcast live audio webcasts of quarterly earnings presentations to keep stockholders informed.
How to contact the Board
Interested parties,
including stockholders, may communicate with all or selected members of the Board as follows:
|
Via Email: |
Via Mail: |
|
|
corporatesecretary@ingevity.com |
C/O Corporate Secretary
Ingevity Corporation
4920 O’Hear Ave, Suite 400
N. Charleston, SC 29405 |
|
Correspondence should
be addressed to the Board or any individual director(s) or group or committee of directors either by name or title (for example, “Chair
of the Board,” “Chair of the Nominating & Governance Committee,” or “All Independent Directors”). All
such correspondence will be forwarded as directed, except that we reserve the right not to forward any soliciting or advertising materials
or any abusive, threatening, or otherwise inappropriate materials.
Code of Conduct
Our Code of Conduct
applies to all Ingevity-controlled entities and their respective employees, officers and directors, including the Board. It emphasizes
our commitment to doing things the right way to ensure our employees and others understand our “IngeviWay” value for integrity
and ethical behavior. The Code of Conduct also contains information to enable better decision making on topics such as employee and leader
responsibilities, data privacy and protection, and third-party interactions.
The Code of Conduct
focuses the Board, management and our employees on areas of ethical risk, provides guidance and examples to help personnel recognize
and deal with ethical issues, prominently features mechanisms to report unethical conduct, and helps to foster a culture of honesty and
accountability. The Code of Conduct is available on our website at https://ir.ingevity.com/governance/codes-of-conduct. All employees,
including executives, and all non-employee directors are required annually to review the Code of Conduct and to participate in Code of
Conduct training.
Any waiver for directors
or executive officers from the provisions of the Code of Conduct must be made by the Nominating & Governance Committee or by the
Board at the recommendation of the Audit Committee or the Nominating & Governance Committee. Any such waiver will be disclosed within
four business days of the waiver (or an implicit waiver) on our website at https://ir.ingevity.com/governance/codes-of-conduct, and will
remain posted for a period of at least 12 months. Any amendment to the Code of Conduct (other than technical, administrative, or other
non-substantive amendments) for which disclosure is required pursuant to Item 5.05 of Form 8-K under the Exchange Act will also be disclosed
on that page of our website.
We have provided
employees with a number of avenues to report ethics and compliance violations or similar concerns, including an anonymous telephone hotline,
with options specific to the countries in which we operate to allow for reporting in local languages.
40 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Board and Corporate
Governance Matters
Governance materials on our website
Governance materials on our website
We maintain several
governance documents on our website, which are listed below.
Our Code of Conduct
is available at: https://ir.ingevity.com/corporate-governance/codes-of-conduct
The following materials
are available at https://ir.ingevity.com/corporate-governance/corporate-governance-documents:
n |
Certificate of Incorporation; |
n |
Bylaws; |
n |
Governance Guidelines; |
n |
Committee charters; |
n |
Anti-Hedging Policy; and |
n |
Stock Ownership Guidelines. |
The following materials
are available at: https://www.ingevity.com/about/sustainability/:
n |
Sustainability Reports; |
n |
Ingevity’s alignment with ten of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals; |
n |
Human Rights Policy; |
n |
Modern Slavery Policy; |
n |
Quality Policy; |
n |
Responsible Care® Policy; and |
n |
Supplier Principles of Conduct. |
These materials are
also available in print at no charge to any stockholder who requests a copy by writing to Corporate Secretary, Ingevity Corporation,
4920 O’Hear Ave, Suite 400, N. Charleston, SC 29405, or by email to: corporatesecretary@ingevity.com.
Related party transactions
The Board evaluates
related party transactions consistent with Item 404 of Regulation S-K. Under its charter, the Nominating & Governance Committee is
charged with reviewing all potential related party transactions and making recommendations to the Board regarding approval of any such
transactions. Each year, the Company solicits information regarding potential related party transactions from directors, director nominees
and executive officers, who are also required to promptly notify the Company and the Nominating and Governance Committee of any new affiliations
or transactions as they arise. Transactions and affiliations disclosed by such persons are then reviewed and analyzed by our Law and
Compliance department using searches run against the Company’s books and records to determine if there are any financial transactions
involving the Company and such affiliates. The results of such analyses are reported to the Nominating and Governance Committee for review,
analysis and determination of whether there are any related party transactions and, if any are found, whether such transactions should
be approved or ratified based on the relevant circumstances.
Based on a review
of the transactions and affiliations reported by the Company’s directors, director nominees, and executive officers beginning in
December 2024, the Nominating & Governance Committee has advised the Board that it has not identified any related party transactions
since the beginning of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, and none are currently proposed.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
41 |
Table of Contents
Director Compensation
Ingevity’s Director compensation
approval process
The Board annually reviews and approves non-employee
director compensation at the recommendation of the T&C Committee. This review involves a survey of director compensation at
peer companies and other similarly situated companies and a discussion with our independent compensation consultant, Pearl Meyer,
regarding director compensation practices.
2024 Non-employee Director compensation
The 2024 non-employee director compensation program
consisted of the following:
Standard
Compensation | |
| |
Cash Retainer | |
$ | 90,000 |
Restricted Stock Unit Award | |
$ | 135,000 |
TOTAL | |
$ | 225,000 |
Additional
Cash Retainers for Leadership | |
| |
Board Chair | |
$ | 100,000 |
Lead Independent Director* | |
$ | 25,000 |
Audit Committee Chair | |
$ | 20,000 |
T&C Committee Chair | |
$ | 15,000 |
Nominating & Governance Committee Chair | |
$ | 15,000 |
Sustainability & Safety Committee Chair | |
$ | 15,000 |
*The Company did not have a Lead Independent Director
in 2024.
Cash retainers
Cash retainers are paid to the non-employee directors
quarterly in advance. Non-employee directors may elect to receive their annual cash retainer (both standard and leadership retainers)
in the form of deferred stock units (“DSUs”) in lieu of cash under the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended, and
the Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan (“Director DCP”). If a director makes such an election, the cash
retainer is converted into an amount of DSUs using the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the business day that
the cash retainer would have otherwise been paid to the director. DSUs representing cash retainers are fully vested upon grant
and are settled when the director terminates his or her service with the Board. DSUs in lieu of cash retainers do not confer voting
rights but are entitled to dividend-equivalents, which accrue from the grant date and are delivered in cash when the underlying
DSUs are settled.
42 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Director Compensation
Restricted Stock Unit awards
Restricted Stock Unit awards
Each non-employee director receives an annual award
grant of Ingevity restricted stock units (“DRSUs”) under the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended, equivalent to
approximately $135,000 at the time of grant. The grant date for the DRSUs is the business day after the annual stockholders meeting.
The DRSUs vest on the first anniversary of the grant date, and shares of Common Stock underlying DRSUs are delivered to the directors
as soon as practicable thereafter. DRSUs do not confer voting rights but are entitled to dividend-equivalents, which accrue from
the grant date and are delivered in cash when the underlying DRSUs are settled.
If a director with DRSUs ceases to be a director before
the vesting date other than due to death, disability, or termination for cause, the director will vest and settle in a pro rata
number of the DRSUs (rounded up to the nearest whole number) unless otherwise approved by the Board. If a director with DRSUs
ceases to be a director due to death or disability, all DRSUs will vest. If a director with DRSUs is terminated for cause, all
unvested and unsettled DRSUs will be forfeited, together with the associated dividend-equivalents.
Non-employee directors may elect to receive their annual
DRSU award in the form of DSUs. DRSUs converted into DSUs with respect to the annual stock award are subject to the same conditions
for vesting and dividend-equivalents as DRSUs. However, DSUs are not settled until the director terminates service from the Board.
Other compensation
Directors are entitled to reimbursement for out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in connection with their Board service. Ingevity does not provide perquisite allowances to non-employee directors.
Stock ownership guidelines; prohibition
on hedging
Under our stock ownership guidelines, each non-employee
director is expected to hold an amount of Common Stock equal to five times the annual base cash retainer. For 2024, the holding
amount is $450,000. Non-employee directors have five years from the date they join the Board to meet the requirement.
Common Stock owned by a director or his or her immediate
family members residing in the same household, either outright or in family trusts, and Common Stock held in retirement plan accounts
are deemed to be owned for purposes of these guidelines, as are vested and unvested DRSUs and DSUs.
A non-employee director in the first five years of
service on the Board who has not yet met these guidelines must hold 50% of his or her vested DSUs and DRSUs. A non-employee director
who does not meet these guidelines within five years must hold 100% of his or her vested DSUs or DRSUs until the guidelines are
met.
As of December 31, 2024, each non-employee director
who has served on the Board for at least five years has attained the minimum stock ownership levels, and the remaining directors
are on track for compliance.
Our directors are not permitted to engage in hedging
activities with respect to our stock. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Other Compensation Policies
and Practices – Anti-hedging” for more information about the Company’s anti-hedging policy.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
43 |
Table of Contents
Director Compensation
2024 Director compensation table
2024 Director compensation table
The following table includes information concerning
compensation for service as a director paid to or earned by our directors during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (note
that compensation for Messrs. Fernandez-Moreno and Fortson is set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table” and not
included below).
2024
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE |
Name |
|
Fees
Paid in
Cash(1)
($) |
|
Stock
Awards(2)
($) |
|
All
Other
Compensation(3)
($) |
|
Total
Compensation
($) |
Jean S. Blackwell |
|
190,000 |
|
135,044 |
|
— |
|
325,044 |
Diane H. Gulyas |
|
105,000 |
|
135,044 |
|
— |
|
240,044 |
Bruce D. Hoechner |
|
90,000 |
|
135,044 |
|
— |
|
225,044 |
Frederick J. Lynch |
|
90,000 |
|
135,044 |
|
— |
|
225,044 |
Karen G. Narwold |
|
105,000 |
|
135,044 |
|
— |
|
240,044 |
Daniel F. Sansone |
|
110,000 |
|
135,044 |
|
— |
|
245,044 |
William J. Slocum |
|
22,500 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
22,500 |
J. Kevin Willis |
|
22,500 |
|
56,290 |
|
— |
|
78,790 |
Benjamin G. (Shon) Wright |
|
90,000 |
|
135,044 |
|
— |
|
225,044 |
(1) |
Column includes the
annual retainer and all additional leadership retainers earned by or paid in cash to our non-employee directors, regardless
of whether such amounts were elected to be received in the form of DSUs. Please refer to footnote 3 of the Security Ownership
of Directors and Executive Officers table for information on shares deferred by directors. |
(2) |
Amounts shown in this column represent
the aggregate grant date fair market value of DRSUs (for all except Mr. Hoechner, Ms. Narwold, Mr. Willis, and Mr. Wright)
or DSUs (for Mr. Hoechner, Ms. Narwold, Mr. Willis, and Mr. Wright), who elected DSUs in lieu of DRSUs) granted in 2024 to
non-employee directors, calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC Topic
718. Mr. Slocum’s service on the Board ended prior to the non-employee director grant made in April 2024. Mr. Willis
received a prorated grant for five months of service during the 2024-2025 Board term upon his appointment to the Board in
December 2024. As of December 31, 2024, each non-employee director (other than Mr. Willis) had an aggregate 2,800 unvested
DRSUs or DSUs in lieu of DRSUs, as applicable, that will vest on April 24, 2025. As of December 31, 2024, Mr. Willis had an
aggregate 1,297 unvested DSUs in lieu of DRSUs which will vest on December 17, 2025. |
(3) |
The amount of perquisites and other
personal benefits has been excluded for all non-employee directors as the total value of each director’s perquisites
and other personal benefits was less than $10,000. |
44 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
PROPOSAL 2
NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF INGEVITY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS (SAY-ON-PAY) |
 |
OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THIS PROPOSAL. |
In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A
of the Exchange Act, we are asking stockholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the following resolution concerning the compensation
of our named executive officers (“NEOs”):
RESOLVED,
that the Company’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as described
in this Proxy Statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the tabular compensation disclosures and related
narrative discussion.
In considering this proposal, we encourage you to review
the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) and the tabular compensation disclosures and accompanying narrative
discussion that follow. The CD&A describes our executive compensation philosophy, programs, and objectives, while the tabular
compensation disclosures and accompanying narrative discussion provide detailed information on the compensation of our NEOs.
We believe our compensation policies and procedures
are competitive, focused on pay-for-performance principles, and strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders.
Our executive compensation philosophy is based on the belief that compensation should be set at levels that enable us to attract
and retain employees who are committed to achieving high performance and who demonstrate the ability to do so. We strive to provide
executive compensation packages that are driven by Ingevity’s overall financial performance, stockholder value, the success
of areas of our business directly impacted by each executive’s performance, and the performance of the individual executive.
We view our compensation program as a strategic tool that supports the successful execution of our business strategy and reinforces
a performance-based culture. To that end, our executive compensation program emphasizes long-term compensation over short-term
compensation, with a significant portion weighted toward equity awards. This approach strongly aligns our executives’ compensation
with the interests of our stockholders.
Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding
upon the Board. However, the Board and T&C Committee value stockholders’ opinions as expressed through their votes on
this proposal, and will carefully consider the outcome of this proposal in connection with their ongoing evaluation of the Company’s
executive compensation program.
Vote required
An affirmative vote of the majority of the shares of
Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on this proposal is required
to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to Ingevity’s NEOs.
Recommendation of the Board
 |
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE ADOPTION OF THIS
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AS DESCRIBED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT. |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
45 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion & Analysis (“CD&A”)
describes our executive compensation program for our named executive officers (“NEOs”) comprised of the current and
former executive officers listed below. This CD&A also describes the Talent & Compensation Committee’s (the "T&C
Committee”) process for making compensation decisions, as well as its rationale for the compensation related to the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2024, reflected in the Summary Compensation Table.
2024 Named Executive Officers
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUIS
FERNANDEZ-
MORENOInterim President &
Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
MARY
DEAN HALL Executive Vice
President &
Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
S.
EDWARD
WOODCOCKExecutive Vice
President & President,
Performance Materials
|
|
RICHARD
A. WHITE Senior Vice President &
President, Performance
Chemicals
|
|
RYAN
C. FISHER Senior Vice
President, General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary
|
Former Executive |
Former Role |
John C. Fortson |
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Stacy L. Cozad |
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
2024 Leadership Transitions
On October 3, 2024, Ingevity Corporation (“Ingevity”
or the “Company”) announced that the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) appointed Luis
Fernandez-Moreno as the interim President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of the Company, effective October 2,
2024. He succeeds John C. Fortson, who departed as President and CEO and resigned as a member of the Board, effective as of October
2, 2024. Mr. Fernandez-Moreno remains a member of the Board; however, in connection with his appointment as interim President
and CEO, he stepped down from his roles on the Board’s committees.
On June 26, 2024, Stacy L. Cozad resigned as Executive
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company, and Ryan C. Fisher was promoted to Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Corporate Secretary of the Company on June 27, 2024.
46 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Summary
Executive Summary
Business Conditions and Company Performance
in 2024
In 2024, we took proactive steps to drive improved
performance and deliver sustainable value creation for Ingevity stockholders. We advanced key priorities to accelerate execution
and focus of business strategies, reduce leverage and evaluate our business portfolio to determine the right composition for our
company, and these actions are already delivering results.
We delivered adjusted EBITDA* of $363 million, exceeding
analyst estimates, and improved EBITDA margins* by 350 basis points to 25.8%. We generated $51 million of free cash
flow* despite approximately $200 million of cash outflows related to our repositioning actions, enabling us to reduce debt and
improve our leverage ratio in the second half of the year.
Our Performance Materials segment delivered a record
year in both sales and segment EBITDA delivering the sixth sequential quarter of segment EBITDA margins over 50%. Revenue increased
4% to $610 million, and segment EBITDA of $319 million increased 11%, with segment EBITDA margin of 52.3%, an increase of 340
basis points. The segment continues to benefit from the increased demand for more fuel-efficient vehicles that require the advanced
solutions provided by our activated carbon, and our collaboration with silicon-anode producer, Nexeon, progressed, advancing plans
to supply commercial-scale volume of our activated carbon product for lithium-ion batteries.
Our Advanced Polymer Technologies segment increased
volumes despite continued weak industrial demand, but adverse mix and selective price concessions implemented to maintain share
resulted in lower revenue. We believe the actions we've taken with respect to pricing strategy and mix upgrade will produce
margins of around 20% in 2025.
Strategic repositioning of Performance Chemicals accelerated
throughout 2024, and included exiting lower-margin, cyclical end markets and reducing our physical footprint to optimize costs.
This segment is now focused on higher-margin end markets and will continue to benefit from an improved raw material cost structure.
The benefits of our repositioning actions translated to improved segment EBITDA margins in the second half of 2024. Additionally,
we announced plans to explore strategic alternatives for our Industrial Specialties product line and North Charleston CTO refinery
as part of our ongoing portfolio review and expect to finish that assessment by the end of 2025.
For additional information on Ingevity’s performance
in 2024, see the “Proxy Summary,” above.
Fiscal Year 2024 Compensation Highlights
The following summarizes the key compensation decisions
for our NEOs for fiscal 2024:
Base Salary: In July 2024, the T&C Committee approved
an increase to Mr. Fisher’s base salary to $400,000 in connection with his promotion to Senior Vice President, General Counsel
and Corporate Secretary. None of the other NEOs received base salary adjustments in 2024.
Short-Term Incentive Plan (“STIP”) Awards: Based on our 2024 STIP Adjusted EBITDA* and STIP Adjusted Revenue* results, as well as each NEO’s individual performance
achievements, the T&C Committee approved STIP payouts to our NEOs who were active as of the end of the fiscal year ranging
from 49% to 118% of target. Mr. Fernandez-Moreno, in his role as interim President & CEO, does not participate in the STIP.
* |
See Appendix A for
definitions and reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the nearest GAAP measures. |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
47 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Summary
2024 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”)
Compensation: In 2024, our NEOs were granted annual long-term incentive awards using a mix of Performance
Stock Units (“PSUs”) and Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”). As in the past, the 2024
PSUs align executive compensation with sustained performance and ensure our NEOs remain focused on delivering value over an
extended time horizon. Any PSUs earned upon the achievement of adjusted earnings per share (“EPS”)* and adjusted
return on invested capital (“ROIC”)* targets are subject to adjustment based on a three-year relative Total
Shareholder Return (“rTSR”) modifier and will cliff vest on the third anniversary of the grant date. RSUs
continue to vest ratably over a three-year period on the first three anniversaries of the grant date, further reinforcing our
commitment to long-term value creation.
In the context of our ongoing PC segment repositioning
efforts, which includes exiting low-margin, cyclical markets, reducing our physical footprint, diversifying our raw materials,
and exiting long-term supply contracts, the T&C Committee determined that forecasting three-year EPS and ROIC performance
goals for the 2024 PSUs would be difficult. As a result, the EPS and ROIC targets for the 2024 PSUs were tied directly
to results for fiscal 2024. The final payout, if any, will be determined in early 2027, after applying the three-year rTSR modifier.
This approach allows us to balance near-term accountability in a dynamic environment with a continuing commitment to align compensation
with long-term value creation for our stockholders. For more information about our LTIP, please refer to “Long-Term Incentive
Plan and 2024 Awards.”
The performance metrics for our 2025 PSUs will have a three-year performance period, measuring rTSR performance (60%) and three-year adjusted EBITDA* growth (40%).
Payout of 2022 PSU Award: The PSUs granted in 2022
had adjusted three-year cumulative earnings per share (“Cumulative EPS”)* and average adjusted return on invested
capital (“Average ROIC”)* as the performance metrics for the 2022-2024 performance period. Based on our performance
relative to the pre-established targets, the applicable NEOs earned 28% of their target PSUs.
Transition Compensation: Maintaining stability and
driving progress on key strategic priorities have been critical priorities for the Board amid the Company’s significant business
transformation and executive leadership transition. To support leadership continuity and ensure a competitive approach to recognizing
and rewarding our executives during this time, the T&C Committee, with support from its independent compensation consultant,
evaluated market practices of similarly situated companies to determine the appropriate value and structure of transition compensation.
As part of this comprehensive evaluation, the T&C Committee, in consultation with its independent compensation consultant, granted RSUs to Messrs. Fernandez-Moreno and Fisher (as described below), reflecting the prevailing market practice for interim leadership roles. Given the temporary nature of these roles, these awards are intended to support stability and recognize the immediate contributions of critical interim leaders during a transition.
|
■ |
Mr. Fernandez-Moreno received $250,000 monthly
compensation for his interim CEO role (as previously disclosed on the Company's Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 3, 2024, his annualized
base salary was set at $3,000,000 and prorated for his interim service). Mr. Fernandez-Moreno also received a RSU
grant valued at $1,000,000. The RSUs will vest on the one-year anniversary of the award, contingent on Mr. Fernandez-Moreno’s
continued service as interim President and CEO or Board membership. Vesting will require Mr. Fernandez-Moreno to facilitate a smooth transition of duties to his successor, David H. Li. Because his service as interim CEO will end before the
RSUs fully vest, he will vest in a prorated portion, calculated as 1/12th of the award per month of service. As a result of the appointment of David H. Li as the Company’s next president and CEO, Mr. Fernandez-Moreno is expected to step down on April 6, 2025. As a result, Mr. Fernandez-Moreno will receive a total base salary of approximately $1,534,585 and, if he facilitates an orderly transition with Mr. Li and remains on the Board through October 2, 2026, he will vest in approximately 58% of his RSU grant, or 15,573 shares out of the original grant of 26,696 RSUs. |
|
■ |
In March 2024, Mr. Fisher received an RSU grant valued at $100,000 in recognition of his service as interim Chief Human Resources Officer. The RSUs will vest ratably over three years. |
|
■ |
During 2024, the T&C Committee approved cash awards (“Cash
Retention Awards”) to each of the NEOs that were active as of the end of fiscal year 2024 (other than Mr. Fernandez-Moreno)
that will cliff vest on April 1, 2026 to ensure continuity of leadership through the CEO transition period. Ms. Hall and Messrs.
Woodcock, White and Fisher each received Cash Retention Awards of $900,000, $500,000, $350,000 and $400,000, respectively. These
awards will be reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the year in which they vest. |
Say-On-Pay Results
The T&C Committee values the input received from
our stockholders on the Company’s executive compensation practices. At the 2024 annual stockholders’ meeting, our
stockholders approved the compensation of our NEOs on an advisory basis by 97.21% of the votes cast. Although the vote was non-binding,
the T&C Committee considered the approval rate as an indication that Ingevity stockholders support the Company’s executive
compensation philosophy and decisions.
* |
See Appendix A for definitions and reconciliations of these
non-GAAP financial measures to the nearest GAAP measures. |
48 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Compensation Governance Practices
Executive Compensation Governance Practices
We believe the following practices and policies within
our program promote sound compensation governance and are in the best interests of our stockholders and executives:
|
What We Do |
|
|
What We Don’t Do |
 |
Use performance metrics to align pay with Company financial performance |
|
 |
No repricing, backdating or discounting of stock options |
 |
Balance short-term and long-term incentives through focused use of performance metrics |
|
 |
No hedging, pledging or short sales of Common Stock by any director, executive officer
or other employee |
 |
Emphasize stock ownership with long-term incentives being paid in Common Stock and meaningful
Common Stock ownership guidelines |
|
 |
No excise tax gross-ups for change of control payments |
 |
Maintain a “clawback” policy for executive incentive compensation in the event
of a restatement of financial results regardless of fault |
|
 |
No excessive perquisites |
 |
Use “double trigger” change of control (with respect to replacement awards)
for severance and equity vesting provisions |
|
 |
No tax gross-ups on perquisites other than in connection with relocation benefits |
 |
Engage an independent consultant to advise the T&C Committee |
|
|
|
 |
Discourage excessive risk taking by offering a balanced compensation program that uses
multiple incentive metrics that balance focus on achievement of long- and short-term goals |
|
|
|
 |
Pay dividend equivalents only on stock unit awards that vest, if any |
|
|
|
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
49 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
What Guides Our Program
What Guides Our Program
Executive Compensation Philosophy
Ingevity’s executive compensation program
reflects the Company’s “pay-for-performance” philosophy. Compensation is directly linked to business plans and
individual performance, with short- and long-term incentive programs based on metrics tied to the achievement of key financial
objectives and individual performance. We are focused on achieving long-term, sustainable stockholder value.
We designed our executive compensation program
to attract, motivate, and retain highly talented executives. In setting compensation, the T&C Committee considers both our
peer group and national survey data (“Comparative Compensation Data”). We also consider other factors, including each
executive’s role and level of responsibility, the importance of the executive’s contributions toward meeting the Company’s
goals and objectives, individual performance and experience, internal pay equity, and the economic and business environment in
which the Company operates.
The Company’s executive compensation program
is designed to:
SUPPORT
OUR
BUSINESS STRATEGY |
PAY
FOR
PERFORMANCE |
PAY
COMPETITIVELY |
ALIGN
NEOS’ AND
STOCKHOLDERS’
INTERESTS |
DISCOURAGE
EXCESSIVE
RISK-TAKING |
Our program aligns with our business strategy, which is focused
on long-term earnings, revenue growth and sustained growth in stockholder value, by providing our NEOs with long-term incentives
tied to growth and value creation. |
A large portion of our executive pay is dependent upon the achievement
of corporate and business unit goals and individual performance. We pay higher compensation when goals are exceeded and lower
compensation when goals are not met. |
We use the market median based on our Comparative Compensation
Data as the main reference point for target compensation. Compensation targets for individual executives may differ from the
market median based on roles and responsibilities, performance, strategic impact, experience, internal pay equity, special
hiring situations, retention concerns, succession planning needs and other relevant considerations. |
We provide a significant portion of our NEOs’ overall compensation
opportunity in the form of equity-based compensation focused on driving long-term stockholder value creation. |
Our program includes balanced short- and long-term cash and equity,
along with fixed and variable elements to discourage excessive risk-taking. |
Elements of Our Compensation Program
The major elements of our executive compensation
program are summarized below.
Element |
How It’s Paid |
Purpose |
Base Salary |
Cash (Fixed) |
Recognizes level of responsibilities, contributions towards meeting
the Company’s goals and objectives, individual performance and experience, internal pay equity, the economic and business
environment in which the Company operates, and other relevant considerations. |
Short-Term
Incentive Plan (“STIP”) |
Cash (At-Risk) |
Rewards achievement of key annual financial performance targets
for the Company as a whole (in the case of our corporate leadership--CEO, CFO, GC, and CHRO), and a blend of our full Company
and applicable business segment results (in the case of our segment presidents) along with achievement of individual performance
goals. |
Long-Term
Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) |
Equity (At-Risk) |
Promotes achievement of long-term financial objectives and aligns
the executives’ interests with those of stockholders. |
50 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and
Analysis
How We Set Compensation
2024 target pay mix
The charts below illustrate the target total direct
compensation (base salary and target STIP and LTIP opportunity) of our former CEO, Mr. Fortson, and our other NEOs for fiscal
year 2024. As illustrated in the charts, the majority of target total direct compensation is at-risk. The charts do not include
“All Other Compensation” shown in the “Summary Compensation Table” or any one-time equity grants
or awards outside of target annual total direct compensation, if any.
Mr. Fortson (Former CEO)* |
|
Other NEOs** |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
* |
On October 2, 2024,
Mr. Fernandez-Moreno was appointed as interim President & CEO following Mr. Fortson’s departure from the Company.
Mr. Fernandez-Moreno’s compensation details are excluded given his role as interim President & CEO for only
three months during 2024. See the “2024 Leadership Transitions” section of this CD&A for more information.
As disclosed on the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 3, 2024, following his departure, Mr. Fortson became eligible for
severance compensation and benefits under the terms of his Amended and Restated Severance and Change of Control Agreement
(“Severance Agreement”) dated February 17, 2022. Such compensation and benefits are not reflected in this chart.
See the “Severance and Change of Control Agreements” section of this CD&A for more information. |
** |
The “Other NEOs” chart
reflects the average pay mix for the other four NEOs who were active as of the end of fiscal year 2024. |
How We Set Compensation
Role of the T&C Committee and the CEO
CEO compensation
The T&C Committee is responsible for reviewing
and approving the goals and objectives of Ingevity’s CEO, evaluating the CEO’s performance in light of such goals
and objectives, and setting the CEO’s compensation based on such evaluation. The T&C Committee meets with the CEO to
discuss his performance and compensation and seeks feedback on the CEO’s performance from the full Board and from senior
management, including the officers that report to the CEO. Ultimately, decisions regarding the CEO’s compensation are made
by the T&C Committee, meeting in executive session, without the CEO or any other executive present. In setting compensation
for the CEO, the T&C Committee also takes into account other factors, including overall leadership and external survey data
compiled from our peer group of companies by Pearl Meyer, the T&C Committee’s independent compensation consultant (the
“Compensation Consultant”), other Comparative Compensation Data, and the advice of the Compensation Consultant.
Compensation for other executives
The T&C Committee is also responsible for reviewing
and approving the compensation of senior executives reporting to the CEO, including the other NEOs. In approving compensation
for the other NEOs, the T&C Committee considers the assessment of their performance by the CEO and other key internal stakeholders,
addressing such factors as achievement of individual goals and objectives, contribution to Ingevity’s performance and corporate
goals, and other considerations, including Comparative Compensation Data and the advice of the Compensation Consultant. In making
his recommendations to the T&C Committee, the CEO is also supported by the CHRO.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
51 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
How We Set Compensation
Role of the compensation consultant
The T&C Committee has retained the Compensation Consultant as
its independent compensation consultant to advise the T&C Committee on the composition of the compensation peer group,
specific compensation levels for the NEOs, and whether the compensation program is appropriately designed to discourage
excessive risk-taking, among other compensation related services. The Compensation Consultant also compiles the Comparative
Compensation Data. The T&C Committee has the sole discretion and is directly responsible for the appointment,
termination, compensation, and oversight of the work of the Compensation Consultant.
Although the T&C Committee retains the Compensation
Consultant directly, in carrying out assignments, the Compensation Consultant also interacts with management when appropriate.
Specifically, the Compensation Consultant interacts with the CHRO, other leaders in the Company’s human resources organization,
and other members of management with respect to compensation and benefits data, best practices, peer group developments, and executive
compensation trends. In addition, the Compensation Consultant may seek input and feedback from members of management regarding
its consulting work product before presenting it to the T&C Committee to confirm alignment with Ingevity’s business
strategy, determine what additional data may be needed, or identify other issues.
The T&C Committee regularly meets with the
Compensation Consultant in executive session independent of management. Further, the T&C Committee Chair speaks on occasion
with the Compensation Consultant on executive compensation matters independently of management.
The Compensation Consultant does not provide any
services to Ingevity other than its consulting services to the T&C Committee related to executive and director compensation.
The T&C Committee determined that, in fiscal 2024, the work performed for the T&C Committee by the Compensation Consultant
did not raise any conflict of interest. In making its determination, the T&C Committee considered the independence of the
Compensation Consultant considering SEC rules and regulations and NYSE listing standards.
Role of peer group analysis
Consistent with Ingevity’s goal to provide
compensation that remains competitive, the T&C Committee considers, among other things, the executive compensation practices
of companies in a peer group selected based on recommendations from the Compensation Consultant. In selecting the peer group for
2024 executive compensation, the T&C Committee considered such factors as:
|
i. |
revenue size and profit margins; |
|
ii. |
industry and business characteristics; |
|
iii. |
location and geographic reach, including global operations and/or distribution; |
|
iv. | competition for talent;
and |
|
v. | data availability. |
The T&C Committee generally targets compensation
commensurate with the market median based on our Comparative Compensation Data. Compensation decisions also take into account
other relevant factors, including an executive’s role and responsibilities, performance, the importance of the executive’s
contributions towards meeting the Company’s goals and objectives, experience and tenure, internal pay equity, special hiring
situations, retention concerns, and other relevant factors.
52 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and
Analysis
2024 Executive Compensation In Detail
The peer group is reviewed periodically for appropriateness
and comparability. The T&C Committee and the Compensation Consultant undertook an extensive review of the peer group composition
in April 2023 which included an analysis of the peer group companies’ businesses, revenues, and relative performance. As
a result of this review, the T&C Committee approved the peer group set forth below for the purpose of setting 2024 compensation.
The T&C Committee together with the Compensation Consultant most recently reviewed peer group composition in October 2024
and determined that the current peer group continues to be comparable to the Company on a variety of relevant metrics, including
those set forth above. As a result of this review, no changes were made to the peer group.
AdvanSix Inc. |
Innospec Inc. |
Ashland Inc. |
Koppers Holdings Inc. |
Avient Corp. |
Mativ Holdings, Inc. |
Balchem Corp. |
Minerals Technologies Inc. |
Cabot Corp. |
Orion S.A. |
Ecovyst Inc. |
Quaker Chemical Corp. |
Element Solutions Inc |
Sensient Technologies Corp. |
H.B. Fuller Co. |
Stepan Co. |
Hexcel Corp. |
Tronox Holdings |
2024 Executive Compensation In Detail
When taken as a whole, along with other elements
of our executive compensation program, the pay elements described below are intended to provide a level of compensation sufficient
to attract and retain an effective management team, while being generally targeted to the market median based on our Comparative
Compensation Data. In addition, our compensation program is designed to discourage excessive risk-taking by using differentiated
long-term equity instruments, multiple performance metrics, short- and long-term programs, and active T&C Committee oversight.
Base salaries
Base salaries are intended to provide a level of
fixed compensation sufficient to attract and retain an effective management team when considered in combination with the long-term
and short-term incentive awards and other elements of our executive compensation program. The relative levels of base salary for
executive officers are designed to reflect each executive officer’s scope of responsibility, experience and performance,
competitive pay levels, market trends, economic conditions, and other relevant factors.
The T&C Committee generally reviews and approves
base salaries annually in February, with new salaries effective as of February 1 of the same year. The T&C Committee may make
other salary adjustments periodically in connection with promotions or changes in role or responsibilities, to reward individual
performance, for reasons related to retention, or to ensure market competitiveness. The committee’s review focuses on whether
base salaries are equitably aligned within Ingevity and are at sufficiently competitive levels to attract and retain top talent.
In addition, consideration is given to Comparative Compensation Data and such other factors as the T&C Committee considers
appropriate. The T&C Committee also reviews base salary compensation with the Compensation Consultant.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
53 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2024 Executive Compensation In Detail
In July 2024, the T&C Committee approved an
increase to Mr. Fisher’s base salary in connection with his promotion to Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary.
None of the other NEOs received base salary increases in 2024. The full-year base salaries for our NEOs for 2024 were as follows:
NEO | |
2024
Annual Base Salary
($) | |
2023
Annual Base Salary
($) | |
% Change |
Mary Dean Hall | |
510,000 | |
510,000 | |
0.0% |
S. Edward Woodcock | |
475,000 | |
475,000 | |
0.0% |
Richard A. White | |
460,000 | |
460,000 | |
0.0% |
Ryan Fisher | |
400,000 | |
299,940 | |
33.36% |
John C. Fortson(1) | |
1,000,000 | |
1,000,000 | |
0.0% |
Stacy L. Cozad(2) | |
470,000 | |
470,000 | |
0.0% |
(1) |
Mr.
Fortson left the Company on October 2, 2024. |
(2) |
Ms. Cozad
left the Company on June 26, 2024. |
On October 2, 2024, Mr. Fernandez-Moreno was appointed
interim President & CEO following Mr. Fortson’s departure from the Company. For 2024, Mr. Fernandez-Moreno received
$739,131 in base salary for serving as interim President & CEO.
Short-Term Incentive Plan and 2024 awards
Ingevity’s STIP consists of an annual cash
incentive that is designed to reward participants for achieving Ingevity’s annual financial performance targets and their
individual performance goals.
Target STIP award opportunities
The incentive award range that each NEO may earn
is determined near the beginning of the year and expressed as a percentage of such NEO’s base salary. STIP payouts may never
exceed 200% of base salary.
For 2024, the T&C Committee established the
following threshold, target, and maximum STIP incentive opportunities for the NEOs. As interim President & CEO, Mr. Fernandez-Moreno does not participate in the STIP:
NEO | |
Threshold
(as a percentage of base salary)* | |
Target
(as a percentage of base salary)* | |
Maximum
(as a percentage of base salary)* |
Ms. Hall | |
17.5% | |
70% | |
140% |
Mr. Woodcock | |
16.25% | |
65% | |
130% |
Mr. White | |
15.0% | |
60% | |
120% |
Mr. Fisher | |
15.0% | |
60% | |
120% |
Mr. Fortson(1) | |
25.0% | |
100% | |
200% |
Ms. Cozad(2) | |
16.25% | |
65% | |
130% |
(1) |
Mr. Fortson left
the Company on October 2, 2024. See the “Severance and Change of Control Agreements” section of this CD&A
for information on the severance payments received by Mr. Fortson in connection with his departure from the Company. |
(2) |
Ms. Cozad left the Company on June
26, 2024 and did not receive a payout under the 2024 STIP. |
* Linear interpolation is used to determine
award payouts for performance between the threshold, target, and maximum goals.
54 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and
Analysis
2024 Executive Compensation In Detail
Performance metrics
An individual NEO’s STIP award is based on
the achievement of financial and individual performance objectives as follows:
Financial Metrics (80% of STIP Award): The primary financial
metrics under the 2024 STIP were STIP-Adjusted EBITDA* and STIP-Adjusted Revenue*. STIP-Adjusted EBITDA* measures profitability
and operational efficiency, while STIP-Adjusted Revenue* reflects the ability to generate sales. These metrics drive behaviors
aligned with maximizing shareholder value by improving earnings and top-line performance. For corporate leadership, the financial
portion of the STIP award is based on Company-wide STIP-Adjusted EBITDA* and Company-wide STIP-Adjusted Revenue*, focusing on
the Company’s overall financial health and growth. For business segment leaders, the financial portion of the STIP award is
based on a mix of Company-wide STIP-Adjusted EBITDA* and Company-wide STIP-Adjusted Revenue* and Business Unit (“BU”)
STIP-Adjusted EBITDA* and BU STIP-Adjusted Revenue*, which provides a balanced focus on the Company’s overall success,
as well as the success of their specific business unit.
Individual Metrics (20% of STIP Award). For both
corporate and business segment leadership, the STIP recognizes non-financial contributions that are crucial to a
leader’s role, such as strategic initiatives, leadership effectiveness, and other personal objectives. This ensures
that leadership is rewarded not only for financial outcomes but also for the critical, often intangible contributions that
drive long-term growth, innovation, and employee engagement.
The performance weights applicable to NEOs for STIP in 2024 were adjusted from the performance weights applicable to NEOs in 2023 to increase the emphasis on profitability, which drives value for the Company and its stockholders. The following tables show financial and individual performance weights
for each of the NEOs that are eligible for STIP(1):
| |
Financial
Performance (80%) | |
| |
|
Corporate
Leadership | |
Company-Wide
STIP-Adjusted EBITDA* (75%) | |
Company-Wide
STIP-Adjusted Revenue* (25%) | |
Individual
Performance (20%) | |
Total |
Ms. Hall | |
60% | |
20% | |
20% | |
100% |
Mr. Fisher | |
60% | |
20% | |
20% | |
100% |
| |
Financial
Performance (80%) | |
| |
|
| |
Company-Wide (20%) | |
BU
(60%) | |
| |
|
Business
Segment Leadership | |
STIP-Adjusted
EBITDA* (75%) | |
STIP-Adjusted
Revenue* (25%) | |
STIP-Adjusted
EBITDA* (75%) | |
STIP-Adjusted
Revenue* (25%) | |
Individual
Performance (20%) | |
Total |
Mr. Woodcock(2) | |
15% | |
5% | |
45% | |
15% | |
20% | |
100% |
Mr. White(3) | |
15% | |
5% | |
45% | |
15% | |
20% | |
100% |
(1) |
As interim President &
CEO, Mr. Fernandez-Moreno does not participate in the STIP. |
(2) |
Performance Materials Segment |
(3) |
Performance Chemicals Segment |
* See Appendix A for
definitions and reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the nearest GAAP measures.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
55 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2024 Executive Compensation In Detail
2024 Financial performance targets and results
Each year, the T&C Committee establishes performance targets in the first quarter based on several factors, including budget forecasts from senior management, a thorough assessment of macroeconomic conditions, and, under normal circumstances, an anticipated growth outlook. This process ensures that when the T&C Committee approves performance targets at the beginning of each year, they are both ambitious and realistic, striking a careful balance between challenge and achievability to drive meaningful results.
The performance targets selected by the T&C Committee for 2024 reflect the combination of the Company’s three reportable segments. This combination reflected the expectation of growth in our Performance Materials and Advance Polymer Technologies segments, offset by a decline in our Performance Chemicals segment. Expectations surrounding the financial results of our Performance Chemicals segment took into consideration the uncertainty around the timing of achieving cost savings derived from the repositioning of Performance Chemicals and the cost of CTO under our outstanding long-term raw material supply agreement. As a result, Performance Chemicals’ performance targets were set at lower levels than 2023 actual performance. The combined result was a reduction of our Company-wide performance target as compared to the actual performance in 2023.
The 2024 STIP targets and actual performance and
payouts are set forth below.
| |
| | Company-Wide
STIP-Adjusted EBITDA* | | Company-Wide
STIP-Adjusted Revenue* |
Performance Level | |
Payout Range (% of target award) | | Goals(1) |
| Actual
Performance | |
| %
of Target Achieved/
Payout | | |
Goals(1) | |
Actual Performance(1) | |
%
of Target Achieved/ Payout |
Threshold** | |
25% | | $ |
315.0 |
| $ |
372.5 | |
| 84.4% | | $ |
1,350.0 | |
$ | 1,373.4 | |
31.5% |
Target | |
100% | | $ |
385.0 |
| |
| |
| | | $ |
1,507.0 | |
| | |
|
Maximum | |
200% | | $ |
455.0 |
| |
| |
| | | $ |
1,610.0 | |
| | |
|
| |
| | |
|
| |
| |
| | | |
| |
| | |
|
| |
| | Performance
Chemicals BU STIP-Adjusted EBITDA* | | Performance
Chemicals BU STIP-Adjusted Revenue* |
Performance
Level | |
Payout
Range (% of target award) | | Goals(1) |
| Actual Performance(1) | |
| %
of Target Achieved/ Payout | | Goals(1) | |
Actual Performance(1) | |
%
of Target Achieved/ Payout |
Threshold** | |
25% | | $ |
5.0 |
| $ |
12.8 | |
| 44.4% | | $ |
590.0 | |
$ | 566.9 | |
0.0% |
Target | |
100% | | $ |
30.0 |
| |
| |
| | | $ |
670.0 | |
| | |
|
Maximum | |
200% | | $ |
55.0 |
| |
| |
| | | $ |
710.0 | |
| | |
|
| |
| | |
|
| |
| |
| | | |
| |
| | |
|
| |
| | Performance
Materials BU STIP-Adjusted EBITDA* | | Performance
Materials BU STIP-Adjusted Revenue* |
Performance
Level | |
Payout
Range (% of target award) | | Goals(1) |
| Actual
Performance | |
| %
of Target Achieved/ Payout | | Goals(1) | |
Actual Performance | |
%
of Target Achieved/ Payout |
Threshold** | |
25% | | $ |
280.0 |
| $ |
320.6 | |
| 153.0% | | $ |
580.0 | |
$ | 614.6 | |
65.2% |
Target | |
100% | | $ |
305.0 |
| |
| |
| | | $ |
625.0 | |
| | |
|
Maximum | |
200% | | $ |
330.0 |
| |
| |
| | | $ |
670.0 | |
| | |
|
* |
See
Appendix A for definitions and reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the nearest GAAP measures. |
** |
No payout is earned on a metric if
results are below threshold. |
(1) |
Amounts expressed in millions |
Individual performance
Performance goals are typically established near
the beginning of the year and generally include both leadership objectives and strategic business objectives. Individual NEO performance
is evaluated by the T&C Committee by comparing actual performance to the pre-established individual goals, as well as by considering
individual accomplishments and other relevant performance criteria.
Against the challenging and dynamic backdrop of
2024, and based on individual achievements against their goals, the T&C Committee approved STIP funding for the individual
performance component of the STIP-eligible NEOs awards ranging from 49% to 118% of target. A description of each NEO’s individual
performance achievements with respect to 2024 is set forth below under “2024 NEO STIP Payouts.”
56 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and
Analysis
2024 Executive Compensation In Detail
2024 NEO STIP Payouts
Based on the financial performance results described above, and the following
individual performance achievements for each STIP-eligible NEO, STIP payouts for fiscal 2024 were as follows:
Mary Dean HALL, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
Age: 68 |
Base
salary:
$510,000
Target STIP award:
70.0% of base salary
Actual Award:
55.3% of base salary |
Individual performance achievements:
■ Led the financial restructuring of Ingevity’s largest segment, driving strategy development and execution
to boost profitability and reduce financial volatility
■ Drove a global cost reduction program to align the Company’s cost structure with reduced revenue and
footprint post-restructuring, achieving $84.0 million in savings
■ Achieved ISO 27001 certification, demonstrating commitment to enhanced risk management, data protection and
continuous improvement
■ Directed the corporate strategic portfolio review, resulting in the decision to explore strategic alternatives
for the Performance Chemicals Industrial Specialties product line and North Charleston CTO Refinery |
|
|
|
|
S.
Edward WOODCOCK, Executive Vice President and President, Performance Materials |
Age: 59 |
Base
salary:
$475,000
Target STIP award:
65.0% of base salary
Actual Award:
76.6% of base salary |
Individual performance achievements:
■ Delivered record segment EBITDA of $319 million on
$610 million of revenue
■ Achieved six consecutive quarters of segment EBITDA
margins greater than 50%
■ Delivered significant reduction in operating cost through
productivity improvements, including lower energy intensity, improved process yields and spend control
■ Drove continued progress with Nexeon, supporting innovation
and growth of the Performance Materials segment |
|
|
|
|
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
57 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2024 Executive Compensation In Detail
Richard A.
WHITE, Senior Vice President, and President, Performance Chemicals |
Age: 62 |
Base salary:
$460,000
Target STIP award:
60.0% of base salary
Actual Award:
29.5% of base salary |
Individual performance achievements:
■ Drove improved safety metrics, reducing recordable injuries by 60% and achieving 1st Quartile performance
per ACC guidelines
■ Negotiated exit of long-term CTO agreement, which allowed for proceeding on overall restructuring
■ Improved year over year oleo-based chemicals sales by 43% because of increased traction within the Road Technologies
product line
■ Executed SG&A reduction of 21% ($20 million), excluding
depreciation and amortization, directly related to restructuring activities |
|
|
|
|
Ryan C. FISHER,
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary |
 Age: 49 |
Base salary:
$400,000
Target STIP award:
60.0% of base salary
Actual Award:
58.2% of base salary |
Individual performance achievements:
■ Successfully managed the legal, compliance, government affairs
and communications aspects of the Performance Chemicals restructuring, multiple plant closures and the WestRock mill and
Charleston plant separation
■ Advanced data privacy and intellectual property protection
■ Navigated the transition, and advanced the subsequent onboarding,
of multiple company executives
■ Developed and advanced global advocacy strategies for all business
segments
As interim CHRO:
■ Implemented HR and compliance initiatives to effectively navigate
several workforce restructurings and established comprehensive communication strategies to support employees through change
and transformation
■ Championed the successful rollout of a global learning and development
strategy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
Performance (achievement as a % of Target)(1) |
|
Individual |
|
|
|
|
2024
STIP
Award |
|
Adjusted
EBITDA |
|
Adjusted
Revenue |
|
Performance
(achievement |
|
2024
Actual Award(3) |
NEO |
|
Target
($)(2) |
|
Company-Wide |
|
BU |
|
Company-Wide |
|
BU |
|
as a % of Target)(1) |
|
(%
of Target) |
|
($) |
Ms. Hall |
|
357,000 |
|
84.4 |
|
N/A |
|
31.5 |
|
N/A |
|
110 |
|
79.0 |
|
281,887 |
Mr. Woodcock |
|
308,750 |
|
84.4 |
|
153.0 |
|
31.5 |
|
65.2 |
|
125 |
|
117.9 |
|
363,955 |
Mr. White |
|
276,000 |
|
84.4 |
|
44.4 |
|
31.5 |
|
0.0 |
|
75 |
|
49.2 |
|
135,902 |
Mr. Fisher |
|
210,482 |
|
84.4 |
|
N/A |
|
31.5 |
|
N/A |
|
200 |
|
97.0 |
|
204,084 |
(1) |
Financial and individual performance percentages (achievement
as a % of target) report the percentages of target achieved for each metric (as shown in the tables and graphs above for each of
the NEOs). See Appendix A for definitions and reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the nearest GAAP measures. |
(2) |
Target represents the target STIP opportunity percentage for each NEO multiplied
by the amount of salary paid to such NEO in 2024. |
(3) |
To obtain “2024 Actual Award ($),” multiply “2024 STIP Award
Target” by “2024 Actual Award (% of Target)”. |
58 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and
Analysis
2024 Executive Compensation In Detail
Long-Term Incentive Plan and 2024 Awards
Ingevity’s LTIP is designed to recognize the performance of our
executives who drive the development and execution of our long-term business strategies and goals. These awards are designed to
further align executives’ interests with those of Ingevity’s stockholders, reward executives for stockholder value
creation, maintain the competitiveness of our total compensation packages, foster executive stock ownership, and promote retention.
LTIP awards are granted under the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Omnibus Plan”), which provides for,
among other things, “double trigger” vesting of any LTIP awards that qualify as replacement awards in connection with
a change of control, as described under the heading “Severance and Change of Control Agreements.”
For 2024, the awards granted annually under the Company’s LTIP
were delivered in two forms, as described below.
Type
of Award |
Vesting
and Payment Terms |
PSUs |
PSUs vest upon certification by the T&C Committee of the achievement of certain pre-determined performance targets
over a one-year performance period, provided the recipient meets the requisite terms, including continued service. Payouts
depend on the level of achievement of the performance targets set by the T&C Committee for the performance period. Any
PSUs earned will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date and payouts may be modified +/-25% by the Company’s
rTSR performance over such three-year period. The performance metrics and targets and the rTSR modifier are described
below. |
RSUs |
RSUs granted for the annual LTIP opportunity vest ratably in three annual increments beginning on the first anniversary
of the grant date, provided the recipient meets the terms, including continued service. |
The target values of individual NEO awards are expressed as a percentage
of base compensation and are set early each year by the T&C Committee. The number of RSUs and PSUs awarded is based on the
closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the grant date. The table below shows the target annual LTIP award values
granted for fiscal year 2024 for each of the NEOs.
NEO(1) | |
PSUs (at Target) | | |
RSUs | | |
Total Value* |
Ms. Hall | |
$ | 612,005 | | |
$ | 575,382 | | |
$ | 1,187,387 |
Mr. Woodcock | |
$ | 427,530 | | |
$ | 416,529 | | |
$ | 844,059 |
Mr. White | |
$ | 414,039 | | |
$ | 372,844 | | |
$ | 786,883 |
Mr. Fisher(2) | |
$ | 138,013 | | |
$ | 176,451 | | |
$ | 314,464 |
Mr. Fortson(3) | |
$ | 2,400,034 | | |
$ | 2,283,917 | | |
$ | 4,683,951 |
Ms. Cozad(4) | |
$ | 465,330 | | |
$ | 451,704 | | |
$ | 917,034 |
(1) |
Mr. Fernandez-Moreno, in his role as interim President &
CEO, was not eligible to participate in the 2024 LTIP. In conjunction with his appointment as interim President &
CEO, he received a RSU grant as described under “Transition Compensation” in this CD&A. |
(2) |
In addition to his annual LTIP award granted in February 2024, the T&C Committee
approved an equity grant on July 5, 2024 valued at $120,000 (the “July Grant”), comprised of $72,000 in PSUs and $48,000 in RSUs in connection with Mr. Fisher’s
promotion, which vest under the same terms as his annual LTIP grant, are part of Mr. Fisher’s target compensation in his current
role and are therefore included in this table. In March 2024, Mr. Fisher received a special RSU grant valued at $100,000 in
recognition of his service as Interim Chief Human Resources Officer, which is not included above. For more information, please
see the Summary Compensation Table. |
(3) |
Mr. Fortson left the Company on October 2, 2024. See “Severance and Change
of Control Agreements” in this CD&A for information on the severance payments received by Mr. Fortson. |
(4) |
Ms. Cozad left the Company on June 26, 2024. See “Severance and Change of Control Agreements” in this CD&A
for information on the transition payment received by Ms. Cozad. |
* Award
amounts for PSUs and RSUs were determined based on the closing price of our Common Stock on the date of grant on February 28, 2024,
which was $45.27, except for the PSUs and RSUs comprising Mr. Fisher’s July Grant, which were determined based on the closing price of our Common
Stock on July 5, 2024, which was $41.29.
Performance-based Restricted Stock Units
The following performance metrics apply with respect to the PSU awards
granted in 2024:
70% - LTIP adjusted earnings per share (“Adjusted EPS”*);
and
30% - Adjusted return on invested capital (“Adjusted ROIC”*).
Adjusted EPS ensures a focus on profitability and operational efficiency,
while Adjusted ROIC emphasizes effective capital deployment—both critical for long-term growth.
Actual PSUs earned are subject to the rTSR modifier based on the percentile
ranking of our Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) over the three-year TSR performance period relative to that of the companies comprising the S&P 1000 Chemicals
Index, defined as the combination of the S&P 600 and S&P 400 chemicals index. The rTSR modifier increases the PSU payout by 25% if we achieve a greater than 75th percentile rTSR as compared
with the S&P 1000 Chemicals Index and decreases the PSU payout by 25% if we are below the 25th percentile as compared
with the S&P 1000 Chemicals Index. The rTSR modifier is not interpolated for performance between the 25th and 75th
percentiles. The rTSR modifier is intended to emphasize the importance of maximizing stockholder returns while moderating
payouts when financial metrics are achieved but the Company underperforms the market.
*See Appendix A for definitions and
reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the nearest GAAP measures.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
59 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2024 Executive Compensation In Detail
In the context of our ongoing PC segment repositioning efforts, the T&C
Committee determined that forecasting three-year EPS and ROIC performance goals for the 2024 PSUs would be difficult. As a result,
the EPS and ROIC targets for the 2024 PSUs were tied directly to results for fiscal year 2024. The final payout, if any, will
be determined in early 2027, after applying the three-year rTSR modifier. This approach allows us to balance near-term accountability
in a dynamic environment with a continuing commitment to align compensation with long-term value creation for our stockholders.
The performance metrics for our 2025 PSUs will have a three-year performance
period, measuring rTSR performance (60%) and three-year adjusted EBITDA* growth (40%).
The T&C Committee established threshold, target, and maximum performance
targets for the one-year performance period from January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024, with respect to each metric. At the
time the performance levels were set, the target level of performance was believed to be challenging but achievable, and the maximum
level was believed to be achievable, but only with exceptional performance. There is no payout for performance below threshold.
Payout at threshold is at 25% of PSUs granted, at target is 100% of PSUs granted, and at maximum is 200% of PSUs granted. Linear
interpolation is used to determine award payouts between these pre-determined points. Payout of PSUs based on performance against
the metrics for the performance period is then subject to the rTSR modifier described above. The T&C Committee certified performance
for the 2024 PSUs as follows:
Metric |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
Actual Performance |
|
Payout |
Adjusted EPS* (70%) |
|
$3.53 |
|
$4.13 |
|
$4.46 |
|
$3.78 |
|
41% |
Adjusted ROIC* (30%) |
|
8.00% |
|
11.00% |
|
11.80% |
|
12.2% |
|
200% |
* | See
Appendix A for more details on the calculation of actual performance on the Adjusted
EPS and Adjusted ROIC. |
The estimated payout for the 2024 PSUs based on the certified performance
levels is 89% of the target amount. 2024 PSU awards earned will be finally determined, and will cliff vest, on the third
anniversary of the grant date following application of the rTSR modifier.
PSU metric adjustments
Under the Omnibus Plan, the T&C Committee may adjust results for
PSU metrics from time to time to exclude the effect of certain non-recurring items of gain or loss or other significant out of
the ordinary matters (such as mergers, acquisitions, and dispositions; entry into joint ventures; significant restructurings;
or changes in accounting rules or tax codes) if they had not been factored in when performance targets were established. Any such
adjustments are made to ensure that executives are neither unduly rewarded nor penalized for successfully implementing Board-approved
strategic initiatives, or as a result of external events that were unforeseen or outside their control.
Payout of 2022 PSU award
The PSU awards granted in 2022 to the NEOs at the time (“2022 PSU
Awards”) had adjusted three-year cumulative earnings per share (“Cumulative EPS”)* and average adjusted return on
invested capital (“Average ROIC”)* as the performance targets for the related 2022-2024 performance period. The performance
targets for these grants were established in the beginning of 2022, reflecting the long-term goals in place at that time, and
were recalculated in 2023 to incorporate the financial impact of significant one-time acquisitions and strategic investments occurring
during the performance period that were not contemplated in the previously approved 2022 PSU Awards plan. This recalculation increased
the target, threshold, and maximum performance goals required to result in a payout.
The T&C Committee approved payment to the NEOs of the 2022 PSU Awards,
based upon the achievement of Cumulative EPS* and Average ROIC* performance goals as set forth in the table below. As a result,
these PSUs were paid at 28% of the target amount.
Actual performance, as certified by the T&C Committee is reflected
below:
Metric |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
Actual Performance |
|
Payout |
Cumulative EPS* (70%) |
|
$15.56 |
|
$17.29 |
|
$18.68 |
|
$13.63 |
|
0% |
Average ROIC* (30%) |
|
9.80% |
|
12.80% |
|
13.50% |
|
12.50% |
|
92% |
* | See
Appendix A for more details on the calculation of actual performance on the Cumulative
EPS and Average ROIC. |
60 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and
Analysis
2024 Executive Compensation In Detail
The payment calculation for the 2022 PSU Awards that settled in February
2025 is shown below:
NEO* |
|
Target
PSUs |
|
Percentage
Payable |
|
PSUs
Payable** |
Ms. Hall |
|
5,980 |
|
28% |
|
1,675 |
Mr. Woodcock |
|
4,145 |
|
28% |
|
1,161 |
Mr. White |
|
2,785 |
|
28% |
|
780 |
Mr. Fisher |
|
1,151 |
|
28% |
|
323 |
Mr. Fortson |
|
20,666 |
|
28% |
|
4,983*** |
* |
Mr. Fernandez-Moreno did not receive a 2022 PSU award. |
** |
The Company does not issue fractional shares. Any fractional amount of PSUs are
paid out to the next whole share. |
*** |
Mr. Fortson departed the Company as of October 2, 2024. Pursuant to the terms of the grant agreement for the 2022 PSUs, Mr. Fortson’s target PSUs were pro-rated based on the number of completed full months from the date the 2022 PSU Awards were granted to his separation date divided by thirty-six months, resulting in 17,796 PSUs eligible for vesting. The 28% payout was then applied against this pro-rated value to determine his payout. |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
61 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Other Compensation Policies and Practices
Other Compensation Policies and Practices
NEO stock ownership policy
Our stock ownership guidelines align the long-term interests of our NEOs
with those of our stockholders and discourage excessive risk-taking. Our guidelines require stock ownership levels as a value
of Common Stock equal to a multiple of base salary. NEOs must retain 50% of net shares of Common Stock received under LTIP awards
until the following stock ownership levels are met:
Position |
Required
Base Salary Multiple |
CEO |
5x |
Executive Vice Presidents |
3x |
Senior Vice Presidents |
2x |
In determining compliance with these guidelines, stock ownership includes
fully-vested Common Stock and unvested RSUs. Unvested PSUs and vested but unexercised stock options are not included. Executives
generally have five years from the date of their designation to achieve the targeted level of ownership. If the required level
of ownership is not achieved within the first five years, the holding requirement increases from 50% to 100% of net shares of
Common Stock received under LTIP awards until the ownership levels are met.
As of December 31, 2024, Ms. Hall and Messrs. Fernandez-Moreno, White
and Fisher are on track to achieve their target ownership levels in a timely manner. Mr. Woodcock was below the required ownership
level as of December 31, 2024. Per our stock ownership guidelines, Mr. Woodcock’s gap in required ownership level is not
a violation because he previously met the guidelines on a timely basis and the gap was due to a year over year decrease in stock
price.
Insider Trading Policy
We have adopted an insider trading policy that governs the purchase,
sale, and other transactions involving our securities by directors, officers, and employees that we believe is reasonably designed
to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules, and regulations, and the NYSE listing standards. Our insider trading policy
also aligns with our commitment to ethical business conduct and compliance with laws. The full text of our insider trading policy
is filed as Exhibit 19.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
Anti-hedging
Our insider trading policy also prohibits members of our Board, officers,
and other employees from trading in options, warrants, puts and calls, or similar instruments involving Company securities or
selling Company securities “short.” The policy also prohibits holding Company securities in margin accounts.
Recoupment policy
We maintain a compensation recoupment policy (“Clawback Policy”)
covering our NEOs, which was amended in 2023 to comply with recent SEC and NYSE rules. Under our current Clawback Policy, in the
event of a restatement of the Company’s financial statements filed with the SEC due to its material noncompliance with any
financial reporting requirement under securities laws, the Board will require reimbursement or forfeiture of any Incentive Compensation
(as defined therein) that was received by any current or former Covered Officers (as defined in the policy and required by the
SEC and NYSE) during the three-year period preceding the restatement to the extent that such Incentive Compensation was awarded
or paid based in whole or in part on the apparent achievement of financial results that were determined by reference to the originally
filed financial information, but which financial results were not achieved based on the Company’s restated results. This
requirement applies regardless of fault or misconduct on the part of a Covered Officer.
62 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Other compensation and benefits
Policies and practices related to the timing of grants of certain equity awards and other equity grant practices
Under our equity granting policy, the T&C Committee approves annual
equity awards at its regularly scheduled meeting during the first quarter, typically held in February. Per the policy, the grant
date applicable to such annual grants is the last business day in February. This is designed to ensure that the stock price pertaining
to the grant will be tied to a date that is more than one business day after the filing of our Form 10-K for the previous fiscal
year and the Form 8-K that discloses the earnings for the applicable fourth quarter and full year. The T&C Committee has discretion
to grant equity awards outside of the normal annual grant cycle, however, the T&C Committee does not have a policy or practice
of granting equity awards, including stock option awards, in anticipation of the release of material, non-public information (“MNPI”), nor do we time the release of MNPI based on equity grant
dates. The equity granting policy also prohibits the back-dating of awards.
Other compensation and benefits
Offer letters
The Company has entered into an offer letter with each of the following
NEOs regarding employment terms (“Offer Letters”): Mr. Fernandez-Moreno, Ms. Hall, Mr. White and Mr. Fisher.
The Offer Letters generally list the compensation arrangements for the applicable NEO, including (as applicable) the STIP and
LTIP details, details regarding sign-on or one-time equity or cash compensation, relocation benefits, and details on stock ownership
guidelines and other applicable Company policies.
Severance and change of control agreements
The Company has a Severance and Change of Control agreement with each
of the NEOs, except for Mr. Fernandez-Moreno. The purpose of the agreements is to ensure that Ingevity:
(a) |
offers benefits that provide an overall compensation package that is competitive
with that offered by other companies with which Ingevity competes for talent; |
(b) |
can retain and rely upon the undivided focus of its senior executives during
and following a change of control; and |
(c) |
diminishes the inevitable distraction our NEOs will experience due to personal
uncertainties and risks created by the potential job loss following a change of control. |
The following is a summary of the benefits provided for upon termination
under the Severance and Change of Control agreements. With regard to CEO benefits, the table below reflects the terms that
were applicable under Mr. Fortson’s agreement.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
63 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Other compensation and benefits
Involuntary
Termination by
Company other than for Cause
and Absent a Change of Control |
|
Involuntary
Termination of Employment other
than for Cause, or Termination for Good Reason, in
Each Case within two years of a Change
of Control |
|
Retirement,
Death, Disability,
or Termination for Cause or
Without Good Reason
following a Change of
Control |
n Base salary through date of termination;
n Prorated target STIP for the calendar year in which the termination occurs;
n Accrued unpaid vacation pay;
n Severance payment of the following:
– CEO: Two times sum of base salary and target STIP;
– All other NEOs: Sum of base salary and target STIP;
n Health benefits – cost of health coverage for:
– CEO: Two years;
– All other NEOs: One year;
n Outplacement services; and
n All other benefits in accordance with the terms of the applicable plans. |
|
n Base salary through date of termination;
n Prorated target STIP for the calendar year in which the termination occurs;
n Accrued unpaid vacation pay;
n Severance payment of the following:
– CEO: Three times sum of base salary and target STIP;
– All other NEOs: Two times sum of base salary and target STIP;
n Health benefits – cost of health coverage for:
– CEO: Three years;
– All other NEOs: Two years;
n Outplacement services; and
n All other benefits in accordance with the terms of the applicable plans, provided that, for any PSU award, the applicable
performance goals will be deemed achieved at the greater of target or actual performance levels (if actual performance is determinable
by the T&C Committee) with no proration. |
|
No benefits other than outstanding base salary through the date of termination. |
The agreements also include one-year post-termination restrictive covenants
in the form of non-solicitation of customers and employees and non-competition provisions. All severance payable is further subject
to the NEO signing an appropriate release of claims. None of the agreements include any tax gross-ups arising from any excise
tax imposed by the Code on excess parachute payments. The benefits to be received are further described under “Potential
Payments Upon Certain Termination Events or a Change of Control.”
Fortson agreement. As disclosed in the Form 8-K filed on
October 3, 2024, following his departure from the Company, Mr. Fortson became eligible for severance compensation and
benefits under the terms of his Severance Agreement dated February 17, 2022 and as described above. Mr. Fortson must adhere
to confidentiality, non-competition, and non-solicitation covenants, and payment was contingent upon his execution and
non-revocation of a release of claims against the Company, which was completed. A copy of the Severance Agreement was
previously filed with the SEC on February 24, 2022, as Exhibit 10.50 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
Cozad agreement. As disclosed in the Form 8-K filed on June
26, 2024, the Company entered into a Transition Agreement with Ms. Cozad in recognition of her service and to ensure a smooth
handoff of her duties following her resignation. Ms. Cozad received a cash payment of $673,741, less applicable
taxes and withholdings, reflecting the estimated cash value of her unvested RSUs, which she forfeited upon her resignation. In addition to the requirement that Ms. Cozad provide certain transition support to the Company, the cash payment was made contingent upon Ms. Cozad’s execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against the Company, which was completed. A
copy of the Transition Agreement was previously filed with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2024.
Equity awards – Omnibus Plan
The treatment of Ingevity’s equity awards in the event of a change
of control is governed by the award agreements and our Omnibus Plan. In particular, in the event of a change of control where
the NEO receives a “replacement award,” there will be no accelerated vesting, exercisability, or payment of an outstanding
award unless the NEO’s employment is terminated without Cause (as defined below), other than as a result of death or disability,
or the NEO resigns for Good Reason (as defined below) within two years of the change of control event. In such cases, upon the
second trigger, NEO holders of such awards will be entitled to accelerated vesting; awards will be exercisable and/or will be
settled. If a NEO does not receive a replacement award or if an award is not otherwise assumed by the acquirer, then upon the
occurrence of a change of control, all outstanding unvested awards will be fully vested (with the exception of PSUs, which will
vest on a pro-rata basis as further described in the table below) and exercisable.
64 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and
Analysis
Other compensation and benefits
A summary of the treatment upon certain termination scenarios appears
below.
Type of
Award |
|
Upon Involuntary
Termination by
the Company
(other than
Change of
Control, for Cause,
or for Poor
Performance) |
|
Termination
by
Executive due to
Retirement
(Absent Cause or
Poor
Performance) |
|
Death or Disability |
|
Change of Control
with Qualified
Termination,
Assuming
Replacement
Awards are Issued |
|
Change
of
Control, Assuming
No Replacement
Awards are Issued |
Options |
|
Vest on a pro rata basis beginning on or after the first anniversary
of the Award Date.
However, Mr. Woodcock’s and Ms. Hall’s options will vest in full because they are each
retirement-eligible. |
|
|
|
Immediately vest in full. |
|
|
RSUs (3-year ratable vest and 3-year cliff vesting) |
|
Vest on a pro rata basis beginning on or after the first
anniversary of the Award Date. |
|
Immediately vest in full. |
PSUs |
|
Vest on a pro rata basis beginning on or after the first
anniversary of the Award Date, subject to actual
performance as certified by the T&C Committee following
the end of the performance period. |
|
Immediately vest in full. |
|
Vest on a pro rata basis, subject to actual performance through the date of the change of control, or based on target
performance, if higher than actual performance. |
Relevant definitions:
n |
Retirement is defined as a termination by the grantee, not for Cause or certain other circumstances,
upon the date that the grantee reaches Retirement Age. Commencing with awards granted in 2021, “Retirement Age”
means on or after age 55 (with at least 20 years of service) or age 65 (with at least 5 years of service) for the participants
who received non-grandfathered language. However, certain participants received grandfathered language in their 2021 awards
whereby Retirement Age is defined as age 65 (or 55 with at least 20 years of service), which is the same definition in effect
for awards issued prior to 2021. Both Mr. Woodcock and Ms. Hall have reached Retirement Age. |
n |
Cause is defined as: (a) the willful or gross neglect by the executive to perform his or her employment duties with the
Company (or its affiliates) in any material respect; (b) a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, or conviction for, the commission
of a felony offense by the executive; (c) a material breach by the executive of a fiduciary duty owed to the Company (or its
affiliates); (d) a material breach by the executive of any nondisclosure, non-solicitation or non-competition obligation
owed to the Company (or its affiliates); (e) a clearly established, willful and material violation by the executive of the
Company’s Code of Conduct; or (f) a willful and material act by the executive that represents a gross breach of
trust that is inconsistent with the executive’s position of authority with the Company and is materially and demonstrably
injurious to the Company, including through potential loss of reputation. |
n |
Good Reason (but only after a change of control during the requisite period) means: (a) a material diminution in the executive’s
annual base salary; (b) a material diminution in the executive’s authority, duties, or responsibilities; (c) a material
change in the geographic location at which the executive must perform services for the Company; or (d) any other action or
inaction that constitutes a material breach by the Company of the award agreement. |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
65 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Other compensation and benefits
n |
Poor Performance is defined as the continuing failure by the executive to perform the executive’s
duties in any material respect, as determined in the sole discretion of the Company, provided, however, that the executive
shall be given notice and an opportunity effectuate a cure as determined by the Company in its sole discretion. |
n |
Qualified Termination means a termination of employment by the Company without Cause, other than as a result of death
or disability, or a termination of employment by the executive for Good Reason. |
Benefits to be received are further described under “Potential
Payments Upon Certain Termination Events or a Change of Control.”
Retirement Savings Plan
The Company maintains the Ingevity Corporation Retirement Savings Plan,
adopted as of January 1, 2016 (as amended, the “RSP”). The RSP allows participants to make pay contributions on a
pre-tax, Roth, and after-tax basis. The RSP provides for a Company match of up to 6% and an additional 3% automatic non-contributory
Company contribution. Contributions and Company matches are 100% vested immediately, while any automatic non-contributory Company
contribution is 100% vested after the first three years of employment.
Retirement Restoration Plan
The Company maintains a Retirement Restoration Plan that mirrors benefits
provided under the WestRock Pension Plan, a qualified defined benefit plan sponsored and maintained by our former parent company,
WestRock Company. The Retirement Restoration Plan is a non-qualified plan that was adopted by the Company to honor historical
WestRock obligations under an Employee Matters Agreement between WestRock and the Company as part of the separation. Benefit amounts
under the plan were frozen at the time of the separation. No additional employees may become participants under the plan and no
current participants are accruing any additional benefits (other than what was in place and frozen at the time of separation).
Messrs. Woodcock and Fisher are the only NEOs with a benefit under the plan.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan
The Company maintains the Ingevity Corporation Deferred Compensation
Plan, effective January 1, 2016 (the “DCP”). The purpose of the DCP is to attract and retain key employees by enabling
participants to defer voluntarily the receipt of certain amounts, including compensation not otherwise eligible for deferral under
the RSP, to provide matching contributions on certain deferrals, to restore lost defined contribution benefits due to Code limits,
and to provide retirement and other benefits to participants through an individual account program. The DCP allows participants
to defer up to 80% of their base compensation and 80% of their STIP. The restoration component of the DCP provides for a Company
match of up to 6% and an additional 3% automatic non-contributory Company contribution.
Relocation and other benefits
We provide relocation assistance to employees, including our NEOs. Mr.
Fernandez-Moreno receives a monthly relocation stipend of $4,055, which includes a tax gross-up of $1,855. During 2024, the total
relocation benefit paid to Mr. Fernandez-Moreno was $12,166. Ms. Hall received relocation benefits in 2024 in the amount of $6,845,
including a tax-gross up of $2,047 related to her move to permanent housing during 2023. Certain reimbursable expenses related
to the closing of her home purchase in late 2023 were reimbursed to Ms. Hall during 2024. These relocation benefits paid to Mr.
Fernandez-Moreno and Ms. Hall are reflected in “All Other Compensation” in the Summary Compensation Table and were
paid pursuant to the Company’s broad-based relocation policy that covers all Company salaried employees. No other relocation
benefits were provided to a NEO during 2024. We also provide limited other benefits to our executives, including our NEOs, to
promote their security and well-being, thereby allowing them to focus on Company business. Other benefits paid to NEOs in 2024
include financial counseling and executive physicals. The value of the benefits is credited to the NEOs as imputed income. Other
than with respect to relocation benefits, the Company does not provide any tax gross-ups.
In addition, NEOs participate in each of the benefit plans or arrangements
that generally are made available to all U.S.-based salaried employees, including vacation benefits, medical and dental benefits,
and life, accidental death and disability insurance.
66 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Risk analysis
Risk analysis
At least annually, the T&C Committee reviews Ingevity’s executive
and non-executive compensation programs to assess whether they encourage or create excessive risk-taking not in the best interest
of the Company or its stockholders. The most recent assessment occurred in October 2024.
In conducting this assessment, the T&C Committee reviewed various
components and design features of all of the Company’s executive and non-executive plans and programs as presented by management
and the Compensation Consultant and analyzed them in the context of risk mitigation. Management and the Compensation Consultant
presented their conclusions to the T&C Committee, which were that Ingevity’s compensation arrangements are not constructed
or administered in a way that is likely to create risks that could materially and adversely affect the Company.
Among the factors considered in the assessment and reviewed by the T&C
Committee were:
n |
the balance of the Company’s overall program design, including the mix of cash and equity compensation; |
n |
the mix of fixed and variable compensation; |
n |
the balance of short-term and long-term objectives of our incentive compensation; |
n |
the performance metrics, performance targets, threshold performance requirements, and capped payouts related to our incentive
compensation; |
n |
the Company’s share ownership guidelines, including share ownership levels, retention practices, and prohibitions
on hedging and other derivative transactions related to Ingevity stock; |
n |
the T&C Committee’s ability to exercise discretion regarding the amount of the annual and long-term incentive
awards; |
n |
the existence of a clawback policy; and |
n |
internal controls and oversight structures in place at the Company. |
Based on its review, the T&C Committee’s deliberations, and
such other matters as the T&C Committee deemed relevant, the T&C Committee believes Ingevity’s well-balanced mix
of salary and short-term and long-term incentives, as well as the performance metrics that are included in the incentive programs,
are appropriate and consistent with the Company’s risk management practices and overall strategies.
Tax and accounting considerations
The T&C Committee considers tax and accounting considerations in
structuring our executive compensation program.
Section 162(m) of the Code generally disallows tax deductions for compensation
paid by public companies to certain executive officers for compensation over $1 million in any year. Nonetheless, the T&C
Committee believes that stockholder interests are best served if the T&C Committee’s discretion and flexibility in awarding
compensation are not restricted, even though some compensation awards may result in non-deductible compensation expenses. Thus,
the T&C Committee reserves the ability to approve compensation that is not deductible for income tax purposes, when the T&C
Committee determines that such compensation is appropriate.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
67 |
Table of Contents
Talent and Compensation Committee Report
The T&C Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis with management. Based on this review and discussion, the T&C Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for fiscal 2024.
THE TALENT AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Diane H. Gulyas, Chair
Jean S. Blackwell
Bruce D. Hoechner
Frederick J. Lynch
Daniel F. Sansone
68 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Tables and Other Matters
Summary Compensation Table
The table below includes the total compensation
of our NEOs for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
Name
and Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
Salary(1)
($) |
|
Bonus
($) |
|
Stock
Awards(2)
($) |
|
Option
Awards(3)
($) |
|
Non-Equity
Incentive
Comp.(4)
($) |
|
Change
in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Comp.
Earnings
($)(5) |
|
All
Other
Comp.(6)
($) |
|
Total
($) |
Luis
Fernandez-Moreno(7)
Interim President & Chief Executive Officer |
|
2024 |
|
739,131 |
|
|
|
1,135,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,235 |
|
2,035,442 |
Mary
Dean Hall
EVP, Chief Financial Officer |
|
2024 |
|
510,000 |
|
|
|
1,187,387 |
|
|
|
281,887 |
|
|
|
76,337 |
|
2,055,611 |
|
2023 |
|
510,000 |
|
|
|
1,020,029 |
|
|
|
71,400 |
|
|
|
77,366 |
|
1,678,795 |
|
2022 |
|
509,151 |
|
|
|
612,023 |
|
204,015 |
|
584,500 |
|
|
|
46,406 |
|
1,956,096 |
S.
Edward Woodcock
EVP & President, Performance Materials |
|
2024 |
|
475,000 |
|
|
|
844,059 |
|
|
|
363,955 |
|
|
|
86,431 |
|
1,769,445 |
|
2023 |
|
471,667 |
|
|
|
712,658 |
|
|
|
257,780 |
|
26,704 |
|
94,358 |
|
1,563,167 |
|
2022 |
|
434,151 |
|
|
|
424,254 |
|
141,402 |
|
445,870 |
|
|
|
80,959 |
|
1,526,636 |
Richard
A. White
SVP & President, Performance Chemicals |
|
2024 |
|
460,000 |
|
|
|
786,883 |
|
|
|
135,902 |
|
|
|
52,534 |
|
1,435,319 |
|
2023 |
|
460,000 |
|
|
|
1,690,160 |
|
|
|
41,400 |
|
|
|
74,165 |
|
2,265,725 |
|
2022 |
|
392,945 |
|
|
|
285,065 |
|
95,021 |
|
389,020 |
|
|
|
72,915 |
|
1,234,966 |
Ryan
C. Fisher(8)
SVP, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary |
|
2024 |
|
351,064 |
|
|
|
414,481 |
|
|
|
204,084 |
|
|
|
47,361 |
|
1,016,990 |
John
C. Fortson(9)
Former President & Chief Executive Officer |
|
2024 |
|
754,098 |
|
|
|
4,683,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
856,341 |
|
6,294,390 |
|
2023 |
|
995,000 |
|
|
|
4,000,032 |
|
|
|
169,150 |
|
|
|
126,880 |
|
5,291,062 |
|
2022 |
|
930,233 |
|
|
|
2,115,062 |
|
705,003 |
|
1,525,580 |
|
|
|
118,592 |
|
5,394,470 |
Stacy
L. Cozad(10)
Former EVP, General Counsel & Secretary |
|
2024 |
|
228,579 |
|
|
|
917,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
709,684 |
|
1,855,297 |
|
2023 |
|
470,000 |
|
|
|
775,569 |
|
|
|
61,100 |
|
|
|
84,649 |
|
1,391,318 |
|
2022 |
|
469,151 |
|
|
|
608,339 |
|
152,754 |
|
500,110 |
|
|
|
81,125 |
|
1,811,478 |
(1) |
Amounts reported
in this column represent salaries before contributions to the Company’s RSP and DCP. |
(2) |
2024 values represent the aggregate
grant date fair value of the 2024 RSU and PSU awards, and the DRSU award for Mr. Fernandez-Moreno, in each case, computed
in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used in determining the grant date fair value of the RSUs, PSUs, and
DRSUs are set forth in Note 12 to our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024, included
in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 19, 2025. For RSUs (including special awards)
and DRSUs, the grant date fair value per share is equal to the closing price of Ingevity’s Common Stock on the NYSE
on the grant date. For PSUs, the grant date fair value is reported assuming the target level of performance is achieved. For
Mr. Fernandez-Moreno, amounts include DRSUs with a grant date fair value of $135,044 granted to Mr. Fernandez-Moreno in his
role as a non-employee director prior to his appointment as interim President and CEO of the Company. For Mr. Fisher, amounts
include a special award of RSUs granted to him in recognition of his service as interim Chief Human Resources Officer (“CHRO
RSUs”) with a grant date fair value of $100,016. The CHRO RSUs vest ratably over three years on the anniversary
of the grant date of March 25, 2024. If the maximum level of performance was achieved with respect to the PSUs granted in
2024, the grant date fair value would be: Ms. Hall - $1,224,010; Mr. Woodcock - $855,060; Mr. White - $828,079; Mr.
Fisher - $276,027; Mr. Fortson - $4,800,069; and Ms. Cozad – $930,661. |
(3) |
No options were awarded in 2024. |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
69 |
Table of Contents
Compensation
Tables and Other Matters
Summary Compensation
(4) |
2024 values represent
cash payments made to NEOs under the STIP. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Short-Term Incentive Plan
and 2024 Awards” for additional information regarding the plan design, 2024 actual performance, and payouts authorized
under the STIP. |
(5) |
The Company does not maintain a qualified
defined benefit pension plan for any of our salaried employees, including our NEOs. However, the Company maintains a Retirement
Restoration Plan that mirrors benefits provided under a qualified defined benefit plan sponsored and maintained by our former
parent company, WestRock. See Pension Benefits Table - 2024 below. During the 12-months ended December 31, 2024, Mr. Woodcock’s
benefits under this non-qualified Retirement Restoration Plan maintained by the Company experienced an actuarial decrease
in present value in the amount of $10,604. The present value of accumulated benefits is based on benefits payable at age 65
using a discount rate of 3.10 percent and mortality based on the “Pri-2012 Private Retirement Plans White Collar
Mortality Table. While this amount appears as a lump sum, the normal form of payment is an annuity. These amounts are “pension
accounting values’’ and were not realized by Mr. Woodcock or Mr. Fisher during 2024. No above market or preferential
earnings are provided to any NEO on non-qualified deferred compensation. |
(6) |
Amounts shown in the “All Other
Compensation” column for 2024 are derived as follows: |
|
|
|
Luis
Fernandez
-Moreno
($) |
|
Mary
Dean
Hall
($) |
|
S.
Edward
Woodcock
($) |
|
Richard
A. White
($) |
|
Ryan
C. Fisher
($) |
|
John
C.
Fortson
($) |
|
Stacy
L.
Cozad
($) |
|
Financial
Planning/Counseling(a) |
|
|
|
17,285 |
|
17,285 |
|
17,285 |
|
8,209 |
|
12,964 |
|
8,643 |
|
RSP
Contributions(b) |
|
31,050 |
|
25,650 |
|
31,050 |
|
21,632 |
|
22,784 |
|
31,050 |
|
26,297 |
|
DCP
Contributions(c) |
|
11,824 |
|
23,249 |
|
34,900 |
|
10,523 |
|
13,942 |
|
52,326 |
|
|
|
Life
Insurance Premiums |
|
705 |
|
1,350 |
|
1,258 |
|
1,217 |
|
794 |
|
2,205 |
|
44 |
|
Executive
Long-Term Disability(d) |
|
490 |
|
1,958 |
|
1,938 |
|
1,877 |
|
1,632 |
|
1,632 |
|
959 |
|
Relocation
Expenses(e) |
|
12,166 |
|
6,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Fees(f) |
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
upon separation from the Company(g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
756,164 |
|
673,741 |
|
TOTAL
OTHER COMPENSATION |
|
161,235 |
|
76,337 |
|
86,431 |
|
52,533 |
|
47,361 |
|
856,341 |
|
709,683 |
|
(a) |
Company provided
financial planning including service fees and travel expenses. |
|
(b) |
Annual matching and non-contributory
contributions by the Company to the RSP. |
|
(c) |
Annual matching and non-contributory
contributions by the Company to the DCP. |
|
(d) |
Annual
long-term disability premium paid by the Company. |
|
(e) |
Includes a tax gross-up of $5,565 for
Mr. Fernandez-Moreno and $2,047 for Ms. Hall. |
|
(f) |
Non-employee director fees received
by Mr. Fernandez-Moreno prior to becoming interim President and CEO consisting of the $90,000 cash retainer and $15,000 cash
fees for service as chair of the Nominating & Governance Committee. |
|
(g) |
Mr. Fortson received $756,164 representing
a pro-rated STIP payment at target as part of his severance compensation. Ms. Cozad received a payment
of $673,741 in connection with her separation from the Company. |
(7) |
Mr. Fernandez-Moreno
was appointed interim President & CEO on October 2, 2024 following Mr. Fortson’s departure from the Company. See
the “2024 Leadership Transitions” section of this CD&A for more information regarding this appointment. |
(8) |
Mr. Fisher was promoted to Senior Vice
President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary on June 27, 2024. See the “2024 Leadership Transitions” section of this
CD&A for more information regarding this promotion. |
(9) |
Mr. Fortson left the Company on October
2, 2024. See the “2024 Leadership Transitions” section of this CD&A for more information regarding this departure. |
(10) |
Ms. Cozad left the Company on June
26, 2024. See the “2024 Leadership Transitions” section of this CD&A for more information regarding this departure. |
70 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation
Tables and Other Matters
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
in 2024
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2024
The following table reports plan-based awards granted
to the NEOs during fiscal 2024. The material terms of our short- and long-term incentive compensation awards are described in
“Compensation Discussion and Analysis — 2024 Executive Compensation in Detail.”
|
|
T&C |
|
|
|
Estimated
Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) |
|
Estimated
Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) |
|
All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of |
|
All
Other
Option
Awards:
Number of |
|
Exercise
Or Base
Price of |
|
Grant
Date
Fair Market
Value of
Stock and |
Name |
|
Committee
Approval
Date |
|
Grant
Date |
|
Threshold
($) |
|
Target
($) |
|
Maximum
($) |
|
Threshold
(#) |
|
Target
(#) |
|
Maximum
(#) |
|
Shares
of
Stock or
Units(3) (#) |
|
Securities
Underlying
Options(4) (#) |
|
Option
Awards
($/Sh) |
|
Option
Awards(5)
($) |
Luis
Fernandez-Moreno |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STIP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PSUs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs |
|
10/02/2024 |
|
10/02/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,032 |
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DRSUs(3) |
|
n/a |
|
04/24/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
135,044 |
Mary
Dean Hall |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STIP |
|
|
|
|
|
89,250 |
|
357,000 |
|
714,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PSUs |
|
02/12/2024 |
|
02/28/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,380 |
|
13,519 |
|
27,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
612,005 |
RSUs |
|
02/12/2024 |
|
02/28/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
575,382 |
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.
Edward Woodcock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STIP |
|
|
|
|
|
77,188 |
|
308,750 |
|
617,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PSUs |
|
02/12/2024 |
|
02/28/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,361 |
|
9,444 |
|
18,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427,530 |
RSUs |
|
02/12/2024 |
|
02/28/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
416,529 |
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard
A. White |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STIP |
|
|
|
|
|
69,000 |
|
276,000 |
|
552,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PSUs |
|
02/12/2024 |
|
02/28/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,287 |
|
9,146 |
|
18,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414,039 |
RSUs |
|
02/12/2024 |
|
02/28/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
372,844 |
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ryan
C. Fisher |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STIP |
|
|
|
|
|
52,621 |
|
210,482 |
|
420,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PSUs |
|
02/12/2024 |
|
02/28/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
365 |
|
1,458 |
|
2,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,004 |
RSUs |
|
02/12/2024 |
|
02/28/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
128,431 |
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHRO
RSUs |
|
3/25/2024 |
|
3/25/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
100,016 |
Promotion
PSUs |
|
7/5/2024 |
|
7/5/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
436 |
|
1,744 |
|
3,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,010 |
Promotion
RSUs |
|
7/5/2024 |
|
7/5/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
48,020 |
John
C. Fortson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STIP |
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PSUs |
|
02/12/2024 |
|
02/28/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,254 |
|
53,016 |
|
106,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,400,034 |
RSUs |
|
02/12/2024 |
|
02/28/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,283,917 |
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stacy
L. Cozad |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STIP |
|
|
|
|
|
76,375 |
|
305,500 |
|
611,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
71 |
Table of Contents
Compensation
Tables and Other Matters
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2024
|
|
T&C |
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) |
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) |
|
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of |
|
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of |
|
Exercise
Or Base
Price of |
|
Grant Date
Fair Market
Value of
Stock and |
Name |
|
Committee
Approval
Date |
|
Grant
Date |
|
Threshold
($) |
|
Target
($) |
|
Maximum
($) |
|
Threshold
(#) |
|
Target
(#) |
|
Maximum
(#) |
|
Shares of
Stock or
Units(3) (#) |
|
Securities
Underlying
Options(4) (#) |
|
Option
Awards
($/Sh) |
|
Option
Awards(5)
($) |
PSUs |
|
02/12/2024 |
|
02/28/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,570 |
|
10,279 |
|
20,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
465,330 |
RSUs |
|
02/12/2024 |
|
02/28/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
451,704 |
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Columns reflect
threshold, target, and maximum amounts potentially payable under the STIP if certain performance criteria are satisfied during
the 2024 fiscal year, subject to continued employment with the Company. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis –
Short-Term Incentive Plan and 2024 Awards” for additional detail regarding the performance targets and amounts that
were actually earned for 2024 performance. |
(2) |
Columns reflect threshold,
target, and maximum number of shares that may be earned for 2024 PSUs awarded under the LTIP if certain performance goals
are satisfied as of December 31, 2024, subject to continued employment with the Company. See “Compensation Discussion
and Analysis – Long-Term Incentive Plan and 2024 Awards” regarding the performance targets and amounts that may
be earned. |
(3) |
RSU awards to our executives generally vest
ratably in one-third increments over a three-year period from the grant date. DRSUs granted to Mr. Fernandez-Moreno as annual
compensation for serving as a non-employee director as of the grant date will vest on the one year anniversary of the grant
date. |
(4) |
No options were awarded in 2024. |
(5) |
Represents the grant date fair value of equity
awards (PSUs and RSUs) computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The value of the PSUs is calculated at target. |
72 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation
Tables and Other Matters
Outstanding Equity Awards
at 2024 Fiscal Year End
Outstanding Equity Awards at
2024 Fiscal Year End
The table below shows the equity awards that have
been awarded by the Company to our NEOs and which remained outstanding as of December 31, 2024. Market and payout values are based
on $40.75, the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on December 31, 2024.
|
|
|
|
Option Awards(1) |
|
Stock Awards |
Name (a) |
|
Grant
Date |
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable(1)
(#)
(b) |
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
(c) |
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
(d) |
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
(e) |
|
Option
Expiration
Date
(f) |
|
Number of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
that
Have
Not
Vested(2)
(#)
(g) |
|
Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
(h) |
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights that
Have Not
Vested(3)
(#)
(i) |
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares Units
or Other
Rights that
Have Not
Vested
($)
(j) |
Luis Fernandez-Moreno |
|
04/24/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
114,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/02/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,696 |
|
1,087,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mary
Dean Hall |
|
04/19/2021 |
|
2,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
73.21 |
|
04/19/2031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/28/2022 |
|
4,877 |
|
2,438 |
|
|
|
68.23 |
|
02/28/2032 |
|
997 |
|
40,628 |
|
5,980 |
|
243,685 |
|
|
02/28/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,294 |
|
134,231 |
|
7,413 |
|
302,080 |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,710 |
|
517,933 |
|
13,519 |
|
550,899 |
S. Edward Woodcock |
|
02/27/2017 |
|
2,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
53.11 |
|
02/27/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/28/2018 |
|
3,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
74.91 |
|
02/28/2028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/28/2019 |
|
2,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
115.22 |
|
02/28/2029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/28/2020 |
|
8,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
45.04 |
|
02/28/2030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/26/2021 |
|
4,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
69.48 |
|
02/26/2031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/28/2022 |
|
3,380 |
|
1,690 |
|
|
|
68.23 |
|
02/28/2032 |
|
691 |
|
28,158 |
|
4,145 |
|
168,909 |
|
|
02/28/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,302 |
|
93,807 |
|
5,179 |
|
211,044 |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,201 |
|
374,941 |
|
9,444 |
|
384,843 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
73 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Tables and Other Matters
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2024 Fiscal Year
End
|
|
|
|
Option
Awards(1) |
|
Stock
Awards |
Name
(a) |
|
Grant
Date |
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable(1)
(#)
(b) |
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
(c) |
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
(d) |
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
(e) |
|
Option
Expiration
Date
(f) |
|
Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
that
Have
Not
Vested(2)
(#)
(g) |
|
Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
(h) |
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
that Have
Not
Vested(3)
(#)
(i) |
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares
Units or
Other
Rights
that Have
Not
Vested
($)
(j) |
Richard A. White |
|
02/28/2020 |
|
819 |
|
|
|
|
|
45.04 |
|
02/28/2030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/26/2021 |
|
1,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
69.48 |
|
02/28/2031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/28/2022 |
|
2,271 |
|
1,136 |
|
|
|
68.23 |
|
02/28/2032 |
|
464 |
|
18,908 |
|
2,785 |
|
113,489 |
|
|
02/28/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,229 |
|
90,832 |
|
5,015 |
|
204,361 |
|
|
05/01/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,969 |
|
569,237 |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,236 |
|
335,617 |
|
9,146 |
|
372,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ryan C. Fisher |
|
02/28/2018 |
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
74.91 |
|
02/28/2028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/28/2019 |
|
667 |
|
|
|
|
|
115.22 |
|
02/28/2029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/28/2020 |
|
1,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
45.04 |
|
02/28/2030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/26/2021 |
|
1,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
69.48 |
|
02/26/2031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/28/2022 |
|
939 |
|
469 |
|
|
|
68.23 |
|
02/28/2032 |
|
192 |
|
7,824 |
|
1,151 |
|
46,903 |
|
|
02/28/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
799 |
|
32,559 |
|
800 |
|
32,600 |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,837 |
|
115,608 |
|
1,458 |
|
59,414 |
|
|
03/25/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,128 |
|
86,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/05/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
47,392 |
|
1,744 |
|
71,068 |
John C. Fortson(4) |
|
05/27/2016 |
|
27,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
27.90 |
|
10/02/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/27/2017 |
|
10,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
53.11 |
|
10/02/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/28/2018 |
|
8,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
74.91 |
|
10/02/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/28/2019 |
|
5,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
115.22 |
|
10/02/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/28/2020 |
|
14,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
45.04 |
|
10/02/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/26/2021 |
|
19,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
69.48 |
|
10/02/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/28/2022 |
|
21,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
68.23 |
|
10/02/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
17,796 |
|
725,187 |
|
|
02/28/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,343 |
|
625,227 |
74 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Tables and Other
Matters
Outstanding Equity Awards
at 2024 Fiscal Year End
|
|
|
|
Option
Awards(1) |
|
Stock
Awards |
Name (a) |
|
Grant
Date |
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable(1)
(#)
(b) |
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
(c) |
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
(d) |
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
(e) |
|
Option
Expiration
Date
(f) |
|
Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
that
Have
Not
Vested(2)
(#)
(g) |
|
Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
(h) |
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
that Have
Not
Vested(3)
(#)
(i) |
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares
Units or
Other
Rights
that Have
Not
Vested
($)
(j) |
Stacy L Cozad(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Options
granted since 2019 vest ratably in one-third increments over a three-year period from the grant date. Options granted prior
to 2019 vested in full on the third anniversary of the grant date. |
(2) |
The
RSU awards reported in column (g) generally vest ratably in one-third increments over a three-year period tied to the grant
date. However, the following RSU awards have alternative vesting schedules: (i) Mr. Fernandez-Moreno’s April 24, 2024 grant
is a DRSU award that will vest on the one-year anniversary of the grant date; and (ii) Mr. Fernandez-Moreno’s October 2, 2024
grant will vest on the one-year anniversary of the award, contingent on Mr. Fernandez-Moreno’s continued service as
interim President and CEO or Board membership. If a successor CEO is appointed before this date, vesting will require Mr.
Fernandez-Moreno to facilitate a smooth transition of duties. If his service as interim CEO ends before the RSUs fully vest,
he will vest in a prorated portion, calculated as 1/12th of the award per month of service. |
(3) |
Column
(i) includes PSU awards granted on February 28, 2023, which will vest as determined by the T&C Committee based on the
Company’s attainment of pre-established financial metrics relating to Average ROIC and Cumulative EPS for the performance
period beginning January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2025, and PSU awards granted on February 28, 2024, which will vest as
determined by the T&C Committee based on the Company’s attainment of pre-established financial metrics relating
to Adjusted ROIC and LTIP Adjusted EPS for the performance period beginning January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024, after
application of the rTSR modifier for the performance period beginning January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2026. With respect
to Mr. White, column (i) also includes a special PSU award granted on May 1, 2023, which will vest as determined by the T&C
Committee based on the Company’s attainment of pre-established metrics relating to AFA Product Volume and AFA EBITDA
Margin for the performance period beginning May 1, 2023 through June 30, 2025. |
|
The
number of PSU shares for the awards granted in 2022, 2023, and 2024 shown at target based on interim performance through the
end of fiscal 2024. Cumulative EPS, LTIP Adjusted EPS, Average ROIC, Adjusted ROIC, and AFA EBITDA Margin are non-GAAP financial
measures. Please see Appendix A for definitions and reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures, as applicable. |
(4) |
Mr.
Fortson left the Company on October 2, 2024, and, as a result, any vested options shall be forfeited if not exercised by the
two-year anniversary of Mr. Fortson’s departure. |
(5) |
Ms. Cozad left the
Company on June 26, 2024 and had no equity awards outstanding as of December 31, 2024. |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
75 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Tables and Other Matters
Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Fiscal 2024
Option Exercises and Stock Vested During
Fiscal 2024
This table shows the stock options that were exercised
by, and the RSUs that vested for, each of our NEOs during 2024.
| |
| |
| |
Option Awards | |
Stock Awards |
Name | |
Award | |
Grant Date | |
Exercise or Vest Date, As Applicable | |
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | |
Value Realized Upon Exercise(1) ($) | |
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting(2)
(#) | |
Value Realized
Upon Vesting(3) ($) |
Luis Fernandez-Moreno | |
DRSU | |
04/28/2023 | |
04/28/2024 | |
| |
| |
1,645 | |
83,813 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Mary Dean Hall | |
PSU | |
04/19/2021 | |
02/22/2024 | |
| |
| |
1,558 | |
73,849 |
| |
RSU | |
04/19/2021 | |
04/19/2024 | |
| |
| |
4,415 | |
196,203 |
| |
RSU | |
04/19/2021 | |
04/19/2024 | |
| |
| |
387 | |
17,198 |
| |
RSU | |
02/28/2022 | |
02/28/2024 | |
| |
| |
996 | |
45,089 |
| |
RSU | |
02/28/2023 | |
02/28/2024 | |
| |
| |
1,648 | |
74,605 |
S. Edward Woodcock | |
PSU | |
02/26/2021 | |
02/22/2024 | |
| |
| |
2,563 | |
121,486 |
| |
RSU | |
02/26/2021 | |
02/26/2024 | |
| |
| |
637 | |
30,646 |
| |
RSU | |
02/26/2021 | |
02/26/2024 | |
| |
| |
7,197 | |
346,248 |
| |
RSU | |
02/28/2022 | |
02/28/2024 | |
| |
| |
691 | |
31,281 |
| |
RSU | |
02/28/2023 | |
02/28/2024 | |
| |
| |
1,151 | |
52,106 |
Richard A. White | |
PSU | |
02/26/2021 | |
02/22/2024 | |
| |
| |
845 | |
40,053 |
| |
RSU | |
02/26/2021 | |
02/26/2024 | |
| |
| |
210 | |
10,103 |
| |
RSU | |
07/01/2021 | |
07/01/2024 | |
| |
| |
609 | |
25,688 |
| |
RSU | |
02/28/2022 | |
02/28/2024 | |
| |
| |
464 | |
21,005 |
| |
RSU | |
02/28/2023 | |
02/28/2024 | |
| |
| |
1,115 | |
50,476 |
Ryan C. Fisher | |
PSU | |
02/26/2021 | |
02/22/2024 | |
| |
| |
724 | |
34,318 |
| |
RSU | |
02/26/2021 | |
02/26/2024 | |
| |
| |
180 | |
8,660 |
| |
RSU | |
05/03/2021 | |
05/03/2024 | |
| |
| |
1,827 | |
97,854 |
| |
RSU | |
02/28/2022 | |
02/28/2024 | |
| |
| |
192 | |
8,692 |
| |
RSU | |
02/28/2023 | |
02/28/2024 | |
| |
| |
400 | |
18,108 |
John C. Fortson(4) | |
PSU | |
02/26/2021 | |
02/22/2024 | |
| |
| |
11,934 | |
565,672 |
| |
RSU | |
02/26/2021 | |
02/26/2024 | |
| |
| |
2,969 | |
142,839 |
| |
RSU | |
02/28/2022 | |
02/28/2024 | |
| |
| |
3,444 | |
155,910 |
| |
RSU | |
02/28/2022 | |
10/02/2024 | |
| |
| |
2,009 | |
75,257 |
| |
RSU | |
02/28/2023 | |
02/28/2024 | |
| |
| |
6,460 | |
292,444 |
| |
RSU | |
02/28/2023 | |
10/02/2024 | |
| |
| |
3,769 | |
141,187 |
76 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Tables
and Other Matters
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
During Fiscal 2024
| |
| |
| |
Option Awards | |
Stock Awards |
Name | |
Award | |
Grant Date | |
Exercise or Vest Date, As Applicable | |
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | |
Value Realized Upon
Exercise(1) ($) | |
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting(2)
(#) | |
Value Realized
Upon Vesting(3) ($) |
Stacy L. Cozad | |
RSU | |
02/01/2021 | |
02/01/2024 | |
| |
| |
2,419 | |
107,234 |
| |
PSU | |
02/26/2021 | |
02/22/2024 | |
| |
| |
2,662 | |
126,179 |
| |
RSU | |
02/26/2021 | |
02/26/2024 | |
| |
| |
662 | |
31,849 |
| |
RSU | |
02/28/2022 | |
02/28/2024 | |
| |
| |
746 | |
33,771 |
| |
RSU | |
02/28/2023 | |
02/28/2024 | |
| |
| |
1,253 | |
56,723 |
(1) |
The value realized on exercise of an Option equals the number of shares
for which the Option was exercised multiplied by the excess of the closing market price of our Common Stock on the exercise
date over the exercise price per share. |
(2) |
Amounts reflect the number of shares relating to RSUs or DRSUs that
vested on the applicable vesting date prior to withholding of any shares to satisfy taxes for each of the NEOs
affected. |
(3) |
Column represents
the value of the awards using the closing price of Common Stock on the date of settlement (or vesting, as applicable). |
(4) |
Mr. Fortson’s RSU awards that vested on October 2, 2024 represent accelerated vesting
of those shares as a result of the termination of his employment. See Severance and Change of Control Agreements in
the CD&A for more information on the severance payments received by Mr. Fortson. |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
77 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Tables and Other Matters
Pension Benefits Table – 2024
Pension Benefits Table – 2024
The following table provides information with respect
to the Company’s non-qualified defined benefit plan (which we refer to as the “Retirement Restoration Plan”).
The Company maintains the Retirement Restoration Plan, a non-qualified plan that mirrors benefits provided under a qualified defined
benefit pension plan sponsored and maintained by our former parent, WestRock (the “WestRock Pension Plan”). The
Retirement Restoration Plan was adopted by the Company to honor obligations under the Employee Matters Agreement between the Company
and WestRock to pay certain assumed historic liabilities transferred as a result of the separation of WestRock and the Company.
Mr. Woodcock and Mr. Fisher are the only NEOs who have
a benefit under the Retirement Restoration Plan. None of our other NEOs currently accrues a benefit under this plan with respect
to service with the Company.
Name | |
Plan Name | |
Number of Years Credited Service (#) | |
Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit(1) ($) | |
Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($) |
S. Edward Woodcock | |
Retirement Restoration Plan | |
27.83 | |
331,066 | |
— |
Ryan C. Fisher | |
Retirement Restoration Plan | |
9.75 | |
36,788 | |
— |
(1) |
The accumulated benefits included in this column were computed through
December 31, 2024, using the assumptions stated in Note 14 to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements
for the year ended December 31, 2024, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February
19, 2025. |
Understanding our Pension Benefits
Table
The WestRock Pension Plan (now frozen) provides an
unreduced benefit payable at age 65 (or 62, if the employee has 20 years of service). The retirement benefit payable is equal
to 1.6% of final average earnings (or pay) times years of benefit service (up to a maximum of 40 years), minus an employee’s
primary social security benefit multiplied by 1.25% times years of benefit service (up to a maximum of 40 years of service). The
formula is illustrated below:
[1.6% x Years of Benefit x Final Average Pay] Service
(up to 40)
Less
[1.25% x Years of Benefit x Primary Social Security Benefit] Service (up to 40)
The Retirement Restoration Plan mirrors benefits provided
under the WestRock Pension Plan following the same formula but recognizing compensation in excess of Code limits. Messrs Woodcock
and Fisher, while participants in this plan, no longer accrue any benefit under this plan. Benefits are payable in annuity form
only, and a lump sum is not available. The underlying plan, the WestRock Pension Plan, to which our Retirement Restoration Plan
relates, was frozen on December 31, 2015. Accordingly, the values above represent a historic liability accrued under the WestRock
Pension Plan with respect to service performed for WestRock, not Ingevity.
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
at 2024 Fiscal Year End
The Company maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation
plan that permits executives to defer up to 80% of their base salary and 80% of their short-term incentive compensation. The plan
also operates as an excess benefit plan enabling employees to defer salary, Company matching, and other non-contributing contributions
in excess of Code limits that apply to the RSP. The DCP provides for a Company match of up to 6% and an additional 3% automatic
non-contributory Company contribution.
There is no guaranteed investment return with respect
to any of these funds. The funds mirror those options available to all employees who participate in the Company’s broad-based
qualified RSP including two additional funds. The Company adopted the use of a Rabbi Trust, which is funded through the purchase
of Company-owned life insurance.
78 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Tables
and Other Matters
Potential
Payments Upon Certain Termination Events or a Change of Control
The table below includes information on each of our
NEO’s non-qualified deferred compensation plan accounts for 2024.
| |
Executive Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year(1) ($) | |
Registrant Contributions
in Last Fiscal Year(2) ($) | |
Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($) | |
Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) | |
Aggregate Balance at
Last Fiscal Year-End(3) ($) |
Luis Fernandez-Moreno | |
— | |
11,824 | |
17 | |
— | |
11,841 |
Mary Dean Hall | |
50,080 | |
23,249 | |
126,930 | |
— | |
680,851 |
S. Edward Woodcock | |
148,986 | |
34,900 | |
289,880 | |
— | |
2,605,150 |
Richard A. White | |
41,504 | |
10,523 | |
8,699 | |
— | |
320,888 |
Ryan C. Fisher | |
25,645 | |
13,942 | |
50,846 | |
— | |
423,535 |
John C. Fortson | |
34,884 | |
52,326 | |
133,494 | |
— | |
1,384,336 |
Stacy L. Cozad | |
— | |
— | |
38,090 | |
207,562 | |
— |
(1) |
Amounts for each NEO represent contributions made by such NEO during
2024 and is reported as 2024 compensation under “Salary” in the Summary Compensation Table. |
(2) |
Amounts represent Company contributions during 2024 that exceeded the qualified plan contribution
and compensation limits applicable to matching, nonelective, and transition contributions that would otherwise have been made
to the RSP, but for the limits applicable to the RSP. These amounts are reported as “All Other Compensation” in
the Summary Compensation Table. |
(3) |
Represents the balance of each participating NEO’s account under the DCP as of December
31, 2024. For each NEO, the portion of the aggregate balance at 2024 fiscal year end that was reported in the Summary Compensation
Table for prior fiscal years is as follows: Mr. Fernandez-Moreno $0, Ms. Hall $480,592, Mr. Woodcock
$2,131,384, Mr. White $260,162, Mr. Fortson $1,163,632, and Ms. Cozad $0. |
Potential Payments Upon Certain Termination
Events or a Change of Control
Please refer to “Compensation Discussion &
Analysis – Other Compensation and Benefits – Severance and change of control agreements” for a discussion of
the benefits payable to our NEOs upon certain termination events and the definition of certain capitalized terms below.
The table below shows the benefits that would be payable
to each of our NEOs (other than Mr. Fortson and Ms. Cozad) if he or she had experienced the termination or change of control events
indicated below on December 31, 2024. For Mr. Fortson, the table below shows the actual amounts he was paid as of his termination
date of October 2, 2024. Ms. Cozad is excluded from the table because she received a cash payment of $673,741,
less applicable taxes and withholdings, reflecting the estimated cash value of her unvested RSUs, which she forfeited upon her
resignation as further described above under “Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Other Compensation and Benefits
– Severance and change of control agreements.” The table below does not include amounts under the RSP or DCP, accrued
but unused vacation, disability benefits, or other benefits payable to the Company’s full-time U.S. employees. Actual amounts
to be received on a termination event will vary based upon the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of
termination, applicable proration requirements, and performance achievement for certain incentive awards. Further, the amounts
below do not give any impact to the payment timing or other requirements under Section 409A of the Code, as amended. Other than
as described below, no NEOs would receive any payments in the event they were terminated for “cause” or left voluntarily.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
79 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Tables and Other Matters
Potential Payments Upon Certain Termination Events
or a Change of Control
| |
Involuntary Termination by Company other than for Cause (or
Poor Performance) and Absent a Change of Control ($) | |
Voluntary Termination by Executive; Termination Due to Retirement
(Absent Cause or Poor Performance) ($) | |
Termination Due to Death or
Disability ($) | |
Change of Control with
Qualified Termination (Assuming
Replacement Awards Issued)(1) ($) | |
Change of Control
with No Replacement
Awards Issued(1) ($) |
Luis Fernandez-Moreno(9) | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— |
Cash Severance(2) | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— |
Target STIP(3) | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— |
Options(4), (5) | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— |
RSUs(4), (5) | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— |
PSUs(4), (5) | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— |
Health Benefits(6) | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— |
Outplacement Services(7) | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— |
TOTAL COMPENSATION | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— |
Mary Dean Hall(8) | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Cash Severance(2) | |
867,000 | |
— | |
— | |
1,734,000 | |
— |
Cash Retention(10) | |
900,000 | |
— | |
150,000 | |
900,000 | |
900,000 |
Target STIP(3) | |
357,000 | |
— | |
— | |
357,000 | |
— |
Options(4), (5) | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— |
RSUs(4), (5) | |
264,271 | |
264,271 | |
264,271 | |
692,791 | |
692,791 |
PSUs(4), (5) | |
567,779 | |
567,779 | |
567,779 | |
1,096,664 | |
567,779 |
Health Benefits(6) | |
9,127 | |
— | |
— | |
18,254 | |
— |
Outplacement Services(7) | |
40,000 | |
— | |
— | |
40,000 | |
— |
TOTAL COMPENSATION | |
3,005,176 | |
832,049 | |
982,049 | |
4,838,709 | |
2,160,570 |
S. Edward Woodcock(8) | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Cash Severance(2) | |
783,750 | |
— | |
— | |
1,567,500 | |
— |
Cash Retention(10) | |
500,000 | |
— | |
83,333 | |
500,000 | |
500,000 |
Target STIP(3) | |
308,750 | |
— | |
— | |
308,750 | |
— |
Options(4), (5) | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— |
RSUs(4), (5) | |
188,070 | |
188,070 | |
188,070 | |
496,906 | |
496,906 |
PSUs(4), (5) | |
395,397 | |
395,397 | |
395,397 | |
764,796 | |
395,397 |
Health Benefits(6) | |
21,213 | |
— | |
— | |
42,426 | |
— |
Outplacement Services(7) | |
40,000 | |
— | |
— | |
40,000 | |
— |
TOTAL COMPENSATION | |
2,237,180 | |
583,468 | |
661,801 | |
3,720,377 | |
1,392,303 |
Richard A. White | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Cash Severance(2) | |
736,000 | |
— | |
— | |
1,472,000 | |
— |
Target STIP(3) | |
276,000 | |
— | |
— | |
276,000 | |
— |
Options(4), (5) | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— |
RSUs(4), (5) | |
166,593 | |
— | |
166,593 | |
445,357 | |
445,357 |
PSUs(4), (5) | |
636,029 | |
— | |
636,029 | |
1,259,786 | |
636,029 |
Health Benefits(6) | |
21,696 | |
— | |
— | |
43,392 | |
— |
Outplacement Services(7) | |
40,000 | |
— | |
— | |
40,000 | |
— |
TOTAL COMPENSATION | |
1,876,318 | |
— | |
802,622 | |
3,536,535 | |
1,081,386 |
80 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Tables
and Other Matters
Potential Payments Upon Certain
Termination Events or a Change of Control
| |
Involuntary Termination by Company other than for Cause (or Poor
Performance)
and Absent a Change of Control ($) | |
Voluntary Termination by Executive; Termination Due to Retirement
(Absent Cause or Poor Performance) ($) | |
Termination Due to Death or Disability ($) | |
Change of Control with Qualified
Termination (Assuming Replacement
Awards Issued)(1) ($) | |
Change of Control
with No Replacement Awards Issued(1)
($) |
Ryan C. Fisher | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Cash Severance(2) | |
640,000 | |
— | |
— | |
1,280,000 | |
|
Cash Retention(10) | |
400,000 | |
— | |
66,667 | |
400,000 | |
400,000 |
Target STIP(3) | |
240,000 | |
— | |
— | |
240,000 | |
|
Options(4), (5) | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
|
RSUs(4), (5) | |
87,661 | |
— | |
87,661 | |
290,099 | |
290,099 |
PSUs(4), (5) | |
90,594 | |
— | |
90,594 | |
209,985 | |
90,594 |
Health Benefits(6) | |
21,314 | |
— | |
— | |
42,628 | |
|
Outplacement Services(7) | |
40,000 | |
— | |
— | |
40,000 | |
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION | |
1,519,569 | |
— | |
244,922 | |
2,502,712 | |
780,693 |
John C. Fortson | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Cash Severance(2) | |
4,000,000 | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— |
Target STIP(3) | |
756,164 |
|
— | |
— | |
— | |
— |
Options(4), (5) | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— |
RSUs(4), (5) | |
216,444 | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— |
PSUs(4), (5) | |
1,066,982 | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— |
Health Benefits(6) | |
38,154 | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— |
Outplacement Services(7) | |
40,000 | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— |
TOTAL COMPENSATION | |
6,117,744 | |
— | |
— | |
— | |
— |
(1) |
Under the “change of control with qualified termination (assuming
replacement awards issued)” column, reflects payout upon a change of control and either a termination by the Company,
other than for Cause, or a termination by the executive for Good Reason, in each case within the two-year period following
such change of control, under the terms of the Severance and Change of Control agreements and Omnibus Plan. Under the “change
of control with no replacement awards issued” column, reflects payout upon a change of control with no replacement awards
on December 31, 2024 under the terms of the Omnibus Plan. |
(2) |
With respect to an involuntary termination of employment by the Company, other than for
Cause, absent a change of control, the Severance and Change of Control agreements provide for the payment of cash severance
in the amount of two times the sum of the executive’s base salary and target STIP for Mr. Fortson, and one times the
sum of the executive’s base salary and target STIP for all other NEOs other than Mr. Fernandez-Moreno and Ms. Cozad.
With respect to an involuntary termination of employment by the Company, other than for Cause, or a Good Reason termination
by the executive, in each case within the two-year period following a change of control, the Severance and Change of Control
agreements provide for the payment of cash severance in the amount of two times the sum of the executive’s base salary
and target STIP for all NEOs other than Mr. Fernandez-Moreno, Mr. Fortson, and Ms. Cozad. |
(3) |
Represents the value of STIP (assuming target performance levels) payable upon termination
under the Severance and Change of Control agreements. Actual payout for 2024 was at 79.0% of target for Ms. Hall, 117.9% of
target for Mr. Woodcock, 49.2% of target for Mr. White, and 97.0% of target for Mr. Fisher. Because this table depicts a termination
on December 31, 2024 for all NEOs other than Mr. Fortson, the amounts are not prorated. In the event an NEO departed the Company
prior to the last day of the year, the amounts would be prorated as was the case for Mr. Fortson. |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
81 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Tables and Other Matters
CEO Pay Ratio—2024
(4) |
The treatment of Options, RSUs, and PSUs on the termination events
is set forth under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Other Compensation and Benefits – Severance and Change
of Control Agreements – Equity Awards – Omnibus Plan.” |
(5) |
RSU amounts shown are the sum of
the amount of the award vesting multiplied by a stock price of $40.75, which was the closing price of the Company’s
Common Stock on December 31, 2024. PSU amounts shown are the sum of the amount of the award vesting multiplied by $40.75,
which was the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on December 31, 2024, multiplied by the expected performance
outcome, which is target performance for PSU awards granted on February 28, 2022, February 28, 2023, May 1, 2023, February
28, 2024, and July 5, 2024. The outstanding options held by each NEO have no intrinsic value as they are underwater. For this
reason, no amount has been reported in the table for each triggering event. The number of underwater options
held by each NEO at December 31, 2024 is as follows: Ms. Hall (2,438); Mr. Woodcock (1,690); Mr. White (1,136); Mr. Fisher (469); Mr. Fortson (0); and Ms. Cozad (0). |
(6) |
With respect to an involuntary termination of employment by the Company, other than for
Cause, absent a change of control, the Severance and Change of Control agreements provide for the payment of the cost of two-years
of health coverage for Mr. Fortson, and one year of health coverage for all other NEOs. With respect to an involuntary termination
of employment by the Company, other than for Cause, or a Good Reason termination by the executive, within the two year period
following a change of control, the Severance and Change of Control agreements provide for the payment of the cost of three
years of health coverage for Mr. Fortson, and two years of health coverage for all other NEOs. |
(7) |
This represents the value of twelve months of outplacement services ($25,000), a benefit
that is also provided for under the terms of the Severance and Change of Control agreements, as well as one year of financial
counseling ($15,000). |
(8) |
Both Mr. Woodcock and Ms. Hall are entitled to benefits upon retirement. |
(9) |
Mr. Fernandez-Moreno received a one-time RSU grant valued at $1,000,000 in connection
with his appointment as interim President & CEO. The RSUs will vest on the one-year anniversary of the award, contingent
on Mr. Fernandez-Moreno’s continued service as interim President and CEO or Board membership. If a successor CEO is
appointed before this date, vesting will require Mr. Fernandez-Moreno to facilitate a smooth transition of duties. If his
service as interim CEO ends before the RSUs fully vest, Mr. Fernandez-Moreno will vest in a prorated portion, calculated as
1/12th of the award per month of service. |
(10) |
Under the Cash Retention Award Agreements, applicable NEOs will vest in 100% of their cash awards upon an involuntary termination other than for cause or in the event of a change of control resulting in a termination of employment within two years of the change of control. In the event of a death or disability absent a change of control, the applicable NEOs will receive a pro-rata portion of the Cash Retention Award based on the number of months served through the date of the death or disability. Applicable NEOs will receive no portion of the Cash Retention Award in the event of a voluntary termination by the NEO absent cause, including in the event of a voluntary termination due to retirement. No Cash Retention Award amount is shown for Mr. White because, although his Cash Retention Award was approved by the T&C Committee in December 2024, it was not granted until January 2025. For additional information, see the Form of Service-Based Cash Award under the Ingevity Corporation 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan–2025 Executive Team filed as Exhibit 10.78 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 19, 2025. |
CEO Pay Ratio—2024
In accordance with SEC rules, we are providing the
ratio of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer to the annual total compensation of the Company’s
median employee. We had two CEOs during fiscal year 2024, Mr. Fortson and Mr. Fernandez-Moreno. SEC rules permit us to either
(i) calculate and combine the compensation provided to each CEO for service as CEO in fiscal year 2024; or (ii) annualize the
compensation of the CEO serving on the date selected to identify the median employee. We have elected to use option (ii) and have
calculated the annualized compensation for full fiscal year 2024 of Mr. Fernandez-Moreno, the CEO serving on December 31, 2024,
which is the date we used to determine our median employee. The ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent
with SEC rules and the methodology described below.
We calculated each employee’s annual total cash
compensation as of December 31, 2024 to identify our median employee. The following pay elements were included in determining
the annual total cash compensation for each employee.
■ |
Salary, base wages and/or overtime received (as applicable) |
■ |
Annual incentive payments received for performance in the 2024 year |
■ |
Other cash payments (including payments related to shift differential, holiday, or vacation) |
Our calculation includes all full-time, part-time and
temporary employees of the Company and its subsidiaries (except the CEO) as of December 31, 2024. Our total U.S. and Non-U.S.
employee population was 1,610 as of December 31, 2024.
We applied a foreign currency exchange rate as of December
31, 2024 to all compensation elements paid in currencies other than U.S. Dollars.
After calculating the annual total cash compensation
described above for each employee, we removed Mr. Fernandez-Moreno from the listing and found the employee with the median total
cash compensation. Once this individual was determined we calculated that employee’s annual total compensation in the same
manner as the “Total Compensation” shown for Mr. Fernandez-Moreno in the “Summary Compensation Table.”
Mr. Fernandez-Moreno’s reported compensation in the “Summary Compensation Table” was $2,035,442. Per the SEC rules,
and after annualizing his cash compensation, his total compensation for the purposes of the CEO pay ratio was $4,247,822, and
for the Median Employee was $91,408. The resulting ratio of Mr. Fernandez-Moreno’s total annualized compensation to the Median
Employee for 2024 is 46:1.
We believe this pay ratio is a reasonable estimate
calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, the applicable SEC regulation, based on our payroll and
employment records and the methodology described above.
Given the varying methodologies used to determine pay
ratio estimates, the Company’s pay ratio reported above should not be used as a basis for comparison with other companies.
82 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Tables and Other Matters
Pay Versus Performance
Pay Versus Performance
The table below includes the compensation of our NEOs and company
performance metrics for fiscal years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, and 2020.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary Compensation | |
Summary Compensation | |
Summary Compensation | |
| |
Compensation | |
| |
Average Summary Compensation | |
Average Compensation | |
Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based on: | |
| |
|
Year | |
Table Total for First PEO(1) | |
Table Total for Second PEO(1) | |
Table Total for Third PEO(1) | |
Compensation Actually Paid to First PEO | |
Actually Paid to Second PEO | |
Compensation Actually Paid to Third PEO | |
Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs | |
Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs | |
Total Shareholder Return | |
Peer Group Shareholder Return(2) | |
Net Income(3) | |
Diluted EPS |
2024 | |
2,035,442 | |
6,294,390 | |
— | |
1,988,228 | |
817,276 | |
— | |
1,492,742 | |
1,062,511 | |
47 | |
122 | |
(430.3) | |
(11.85) |
2023 | |
5,291,042 | |
— | |
— | |
(1,080,067) | |
— | |
— | |
1,718,066 | |
218,609 | |
54 | |
130 | |
(5.4) | |
(0.07) |
2022 | |
5,394,470 | |
— | |
— | |
7,321,335 | |
— | |
— | |
1,632,294 | |
1,902,483 | |
81 | |
124 | |
212 | |
5.50 |
2021 | |
4,822,288 | |
— | |
— | |
3,458,254 | |
— | |
— | |
2,158,730 | |
1,915,624 | |
82 | |
146 | |
118 | |
2.95 |
2020 | |
2,831,502 | |
1,736,323 | |
146,618 | |
2,393,213 | |
1,843,148 | |
(7,807,582) | |
1,576,121 | |
1,106,292 | |
87 | |
117 | |
181 | |
4.37 |
(1) |
Represents the amount reported for each of the corresponding years
in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Luis Fernandez-Moreno (current interim CEO) and John
C. Fortson (former CEO), the Company’s PEOs in fiscal year 2024, for John C. Fortson, the Company’s PEO during
fiscal years 2023, 2022, and 2021, and for John C. Fortson, Richard B. Kelson, and D. Michael Wilson, the Company’s
PEOs during fiscal year 2020. |
(2) |
The peer group used for this purpose is the following published industry index: S&P
600 Chemicals Index. |
(3) |
Represents the amount of Net Income reflected in the Company’s audited financial
statements for the applicable year. |
The table below shows the additions and deductions to calculate Compensation
Actually Paid as well as the executives covered in each fiscal year.(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2020 | |
2021 | |
2022 | |
2023 | |
2024 |
| |
1st PEO | |
2nd PEO | |
3rd PEO | |
Average Non-PEO NEO | |
1st PEO | |
Average Non-PEO NEO | |
1st PEO | |
Average Non-PEO NEO | |
1st PEO | |
Average Non-PEO NEO | |
1st PEO | |
2nd PEO | |
Average Non-PEO NEO |
| |
John C. Fortson | |
Richard B. Kelson | |
D. Michael Wilson | |
Michael P. Smith; S. Edward Woodcock; Katherine P. Burgeson. | |
John C. Fortson | |
Mary Dean Hall; Stacy L. Cozad; Michael P. Smith; S. Edward Woodcock | |
John C. Fortson | |
Mary Dean Hall; Stacy L. Cozad; S. Edward Woodcock; Rich White | |
John C. Fortson | |
Mary Dean Hall; Stacy L. Cozad; Rich White; S. Edward Woodcock | |
Luis Fernandez- Moreno | |
John C. Fortson | |
Mary Dean Hall; Stacy L. Cozad; S. Edward Woodcock; Rich White; Ryan Fisher |
SCT Total | |
2,831,502 | |
1,736,323 | |
146,618 | |
1,576,121 | |
4,822,288 | |
2,158,730 | |
5,394,470 | |
1,632,294 | |
5,291,042 | |
1,718,066 | |
2,035,442 | |
6,294,390 | |
1,492,742 |
Deduction for Amounts Reported under the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” Columns in the Summary Compensation Table for Applicable FY | |
(1,636,289) | |
(113,246) | |
0 | |
(533,400) | |
(2,475,054) | |
(1,077,066) | |
(2,820,065) | |
(630,718) | |
(4,000,032) | |
(1,049,604) | |
(1,135,076) | |
(4,683,951) | |
(829,969) |
Increase of Fair Value of Awards Granted during Applicable FY that Remain Unvested as of Applicable FY End, determined as of Applicable FY End | |
2,727,897 | |
220,071 | |
0 | |
719,028 | |
2,360,413 | |
1,051,388 | |
3,312,410 | |
735,497 | |
1,227,626 | |
282,949 | |
1,087,862 | |
0 | |
558,077 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
83 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Tables and Other Matters
Pay Versus Performance are estimated
at close-day stock price as of 12/31/2024, calculations are subject to change)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2020 | |
2021 | |
2022 | |
2023 | |
2024 |
| |
1st PEO | |
2nd PEO | |
3rd PEO | |
Average Non-PEO NEO | |
1st PEO | |
Average Non-PEO NEO | |
1st PEO | |
Average Non-PEO NEO | |
1st PEO | |
Average Non-PEO NEO | |
1st PEO | |
2nd PEO | |
Average Non-PEO NEO |
| |
John C. Fortson | |
Richard B. Kelson | |
D. Michael Wilson | |
Michael P. Smith; S. Edward Woodcock; Katherine P. Burgeson. | |
John C. Fortson | |
Mary Dean Hall; Stacy L. Cozad; Michael P. Smith; S. Edward Woodcock | |
John C. Fortson | |
Mary Dean Hall; Stacy L. Cozad; S. Edward Woodcock; Rich White | |
John C. Fortson | |
Mary Dean Hall; Stacy L. Cozad; Rich White; S. Edward Woodcock | |
Luis Fernandez- Moreno | |
John C. Fortson | |
Mary Dean Hall; Stacy L. Cozad; S. Edward Woodcock; Rich White; Ryan Fisher |
Increase of Fair Value of Awards Granted during Applicable FY that Vested as of Applicable FY End, determined as of Applicable FY End | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
73,511 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 |
Increase/deduction for Awards Granted during Prior FYs that were Outstanding and Unvested as of Applicable FY End, determined based on change in Fair Value from Prior FY End to Applicable FY End | |
(672,008) | |
0 | |
0 | |
(259,354) | |
(1,109,324) | |
(178,326) | |
1,512,795 | |
196,153 | |
(3,874,416) | |
(820,193) | |
0 | |
(154,637) | |
(41,541) |
Increase/deduction for Awards Granted during Prior FYs that Vested During Applicable FY, determined based on change in Fair Value from Prior FY End to Vesting Date | |
(857,888) | |
0 | |
(978,694) | |
(321,375) | |
(140,069) | |
(39,102) | |
(78,275) | |
(30,741) | |
481,618 | |
104,701 | |
0 | |
267,327 | |
(3,635) |
Deduction of Fair Value of Awards Granted during Prior FY that were Forfeited during Applicable FY, determined as of Prior FY End | |
0 | |
0 | |
(6,975,507) | |
(66,686) | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
(205,906) | |
(17,310) | |
0 | |
(905,853) | |
(113,163) |
Increase based on Dividends or Other Earnings Paid during Applicable FY prior to Vesting Date | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 |
Increase based on Incremental Fair Value of Options/ SARs Modified during Applicable FY | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 |
84 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Tables and Other Matters
Pay Versus Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2020 | |
2021 | |
2022 | |
2023 | |
2024 |
| |
1st PEO | |
2nd PEO | |
3rd PEO | |
Average Non-PEO NEO | |
1st PEO | |
Average Non-PEO NEO | |
1st PEO | |
Average Non-PEO NEO | |
1st PEO | |
Average Non-PEO NEO | |
1st PEO | |
2nd PEO | |
Average Non-PEO NEO |
| |
John C. Fortson | |
Richard B. Kelson | |
D. Michael Wilson | |
Michael P. Smith; S. Edward Woodcock; Katherine P. Burgeson. | |
John C. Fortson | |
Mary Dean Hall; Stacy L. Cozad; Michael P. Smith; S. Edward Woodcock | |
John C. Fortson | |
Mary Dean Hall; Stacy L. Cozad; S. Edward Woodcock; Rich White | |
John C. Fortson | |
Mary Dean Hall; Stacy L. Cozad; Rich White; S. Edward Woodcock | |
Luis Fernandez- Moreno | |
John C. Fortson | |
Mary Dean Hall; Stacy L. Cozad; S. Edward Woodcock; Rich White; Ryan Fisher |
Deduction for Change in the Actuarial Present Values reported under the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” Column of the Summary Compensation Table for Applicable FY | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
(81,553) | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 |
Increase for Service Cost and, if applicable, Prior Service Cost for Pension Plans | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
0 |
Total Adjustments | |
(438,289) | |
106,825 | |
(7,954,200) | |
(469,829) | |
(1,364,034) | |
(243,106) | |
1,926,865 | |
270,190 | |
(6,371,109) | |
(1,499,457) | |
(47,214) | |
(5,477,114) | |
(430,231) |
Compensation Actually Paid | |
2,393,213 | |
1,843,148 | |
(7,807,582) | |
1,106,292 | |
3,458,254 | |
1,915,624 | |
7,321,335 | |
1,902,483 | |
(1,080,067) | |
218,609 | |
1,988,228 | |
817,276 | |
1,062,511 |
(3) |
Equity values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718,
and the valuation assumptions used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of the
grant. |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
85 |
Table of Contents
Compensation Tables and Other Matters
Pay Versus Performance
Descriptions between Compensation Actually Paid and Company and
Peer Group Performance
The charts below provide an illustration of the relationship between
Compensation Actually Paid, Ingevity TSR, Peer Group TSR, Ingevity GAAP Net Income, and Ingevity Diluted EPS for fiscal years 2020
through 2024.
Compensation Actually Paid vs Diluted EPS

Compensation Actually Paid vs Net Income

86 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Compensation Tables and Other Matters
Pay Versus Performance
Compensation Actually Paid vs Company and Peer Group Shareholder Return

Tabular List
The table below represents the most important financial performance
measures used by Ingevity to link compensation actually paid to our named executive officers to company performance for FY24, as
discussed further in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A).
STIP Adjusted EBITDA |
|
STIP Adjusted Revenue |
|
Diluted EPS |
|
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
87 |
Table of Contents
PROPOSAL 3
RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
 |
OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS
A VOTE FOR RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE COMPANY’S
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS FOR FISCAL 2025. |
The Audit Committee is directly responsible
for appointing, retaining, fixing the compensation of, and overseeing the work of our independent registered public accounting firm.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC (“PwC”) acted as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2024 and the Audit Committee has retained PwC to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2025.
Although it is not legally required to
do so, the Board has elected to seek stockholder ratification of the appointment of PwC as a matter of good corporate governance. If
stockholders do not ratify the appointment of PwC, the Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment. Regardless of the outcome of
this proposal, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, select a new independent registered public accounting firm at any time during
the year if it believes such a change would be in the Company’s best interest.
Representatives of PwC will be present
at the Annual Meeting. They will have the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate
questions from stockholders.
Vote required:
An affirmative vote of the majority of
the shares of Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on this proposal is required
for the ratification of the appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2025.
Recommendation of the Board
 |
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE
RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PWC AS THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM OF THE COMPANY. |
88 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Audit
Committee Matters
Audit and other fees
The following table shows the fees paid
by the Company to PwC for audit and other services provided for the fiscal years 2024 and 2023.
Amounts Shown in $ |
|
2024 |
|
2023 |
Audit Fees |
|
2,320,000 |
|
2,375,000 |
Audit-Related Fees |
|
25,000 |
|
189,530 |
Tax Fees |
|
— |
|
— |
All Other Fees |
|
77,500 |
|
10,000 |
TOTAL |
|
2,422,500 |
|
2,574,530 |
Audit fees
Amount includes fees for professional services
performed for the integrated audit of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Form
10-K filing and review of financial statements included in the Company’s Form 10-Q filings. Amount also includes other services
that are normally provided by PwC in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
Audit-related fees
Amount includes fees paid for services
that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements. For 2024, amount includes
services provided in connection with the Company’s assessment of the Pillar Two enactment. For 2023, amount includes services
provided in connection with the Company’s implementation of a new enterprise resource planning system.
Tax fees
Amount includes fees and expenses for U.S.
federal, state, and international tax planning and tax compliance services. There were no tax fees for 2024 or 2023.
All other fees
Amount includes fees for services in connection
with attestations by PwC that are required by statute or regulation.
Pre-approval policy and
procedures
The Audit Committee’s pre-approval
policy requires that all services to be performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm be pre-approved
either on a case-by-case basis by the Audit Committee or its delegate or on a categorical basis based on the Audit Committee’s
prior approval of a specific category of service and the expected cost thereof. Any request for services involving less than $150,000
may be approved by the Chair of the Audit Committee, provided that any such approval is presented to the full Audit Committee at its
next regularly scheduled meeting.
The Audit Committee pre-approved all of
the audit fees, audit-related fees, and all other fees paid to PwC in fiscal 2024.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
89 |
Table of Contents
Audit Committee Report
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed
the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024, including management’s annual assessment of
and report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, with management and with PwC, the Company’s independent
auditor. The Audit Committee has discussed with PwC the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the SEC. The Audit Committee also received from PwC the written disclosures
and letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding PwC’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning
independence and has discussed with PwC the issue of their independence from the Company.
Based on the foregoing, the Audit Committee
recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, for filing with the SEC.
THE
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Daniel F. Sansone, Chair
Frederick J. Lynch
Karen G. Narwold
J. Kevin Willis
Benjamin G. Wright
90 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
PROPOSAL 4
APPROVAL OF INGEVITY CORPORATION
2025 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN |
 |
OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS
A VOTE FOR THE PROPOSED 2025 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN. |
On February 10, 2025, upon the recommendation
of the T&C Committee of the Board (the “Committee”), the Board adopted the Ingevity Corporation 2025 Omnibus Incentive
Plan (the “2025 Omnibus Plan”), subject to approval by our stockholders. The 2025 Omnibus Plan will only become effective
if it is approved by the Company’s stockholders at the Annual Meeting (the date of such approval being the “New Plan Effective
Date”). The primary purpose of the 2025 Omnibus Plan is to reward selected corporate officers, key employees and non-employee directors
of the Company (and its subsidiaries) by enabling them to acquire shares of common stock of the Company and/or through the provision
of long-term and short-term cash payments. The 2025 Omnibus Plan is designed to attract and retain employees and non-employee directors
of the Company and to encourage a sense of proprietorship in the Company.
We currently have one active equity-based
incentive plan, the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Existing Plan”). If approved by our
stockholders, the 2025 Omnibus Plan will replace the Existing Plan. The 2025 Omnibus Plan will, among other things, allow the issuance
of up to (a) 425,000 shares of Common Stock, plus (b) the number of shares of Common Stock that remain available for issuance under
the Existing Plan immediately prior to the date the stockholders of the Company approve the 2025 Omnibus Plan (1,320,347 shares as
of March 1, 2025), plus (c) the number of shares of Common Stock underlying any equity awards previously granted under the Existing
Plan as of the New Plan Effective Date that, on or after the New Plan Effective Date, are forfeited, terminated, expire or lapse without
being exercised, or any awards that are settled for cash. The foregoing shares of Common Stock described under (a), (b) and (c), above,
are the shares of Common Stock that will be available for issuance under the 2025 Omnibus Plan, subject to the adjustment provisions
of that plan (collectively, the “Authorized Plan Shares”). Upon the New Plan Effective Date, the Company will cease granting
awards under the Existing Plan, however, any outstanding awards under the Existing Plan as of the New Plan Effective Date will
remain outstanding in accordance with their terms and will continue to be governed solely by the terms of the documents evidencing such
awards, and no provision of the 2025 Omnibus Plan will be deemed to affect or otherwise modify the rights or obligations of the holders
of such awards.
Key Considerations for Requesting Additional Shares
In determining the number of shares to be authorized under the 2025 Omnibus Plan, the Board and the T&C Committee considered the following principal factors:
|
■
|
Number of Shares Available for Grant under Existing Plan: As of March 1, 2025, 1,320,347 shares remained available for issuance under the Existing Plan. If the Company is unable to grant competitive equity awards, it may be required to offer additional cash-based incentives to replace equity as a means of competing for or retaining key talent. An inability to attract and retain key talent through competitive compensation could impact the Company’s execution of its strategy and hamper the Company’s ability to achieve its goals. |
|
■ |
Employee Engagement and Alignment with Stockholder Objectives: The Board and the Committee believe that equity ownership by Company employees has a direct correlation to increased employee engagement, which can help keep focus on execution of corporate strategy. In addition, employees with equity are aligned with our other stockholders in a desire to achieve results that drive stockholder value. |
|
■ |
Compensation Philosophy: Delivering a significant portion of total compensation in the form of equity is part of our executive compensation philosophy of paying for performance and aligning NEO compensation with stockholder interests. |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
91 |
Table of Contents
Proposal 4
Description of Principal Features of the
2025 Omnibus Plan
Overhang and Dilution. The table
below sets forth information regarding the overhang, or potential stockholder dilution, and dilution rates as of December 31, 2024, 2023
and 2022 and updated as of March 1, 2025.
|
|
Potential
Dilution as of December 31, 2024 |
|
Potential Dilution as of March 1, 2025 |
|
Potential
Dilution After Giving Effect
to the New Plan |
Available for Issuance (2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan) |
|
1,817,417 |
|
1,320,347 |
|
n/a |
Unvested RSUs and DSUs and Unissued DSUs |
|
499,764 |
|
568,491 |
|
568,491 |
Unvested PSUs |
|
213,117 |
|
342,735 |
|
342,735 |
Options Outstanding |
|
256,954 |
|
253,219 |
|
253,219 |
Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
|
319,611 |
|
319,611 |
|
319,611 |
Available for Issuance (2025 Omnibus Incentive Plan) |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
1,745,347 |
Total |
|
3,106,863 |
|
2,804,403 |
|
3,229,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burn
Rate Information. The table below sets forth information regarding historical awards granted in 2024, 2023 and 2022. |
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Number
of Shares
Subject to Awards(1) |
|
Burn Rate
(%) |
2024 |
|
451,000 |
|
1.2% |
2023 |
|
278,000 |
|
0.8% |
2022 |
|
253,000 |
|
0.7% |
Three-Year Average Burn Rate |
|
|
|
0.9% |
(1) |
Shares subject to awards include options and RSUs granted, and performance based
awards earned, in the given year. |
Description of Principal
Features of the 2025 Omnibus Plan
A copy of the 2025 Omnibus Plan is included
as Appendix B to this Proxy Statement. The following description of the principal features is not intended to be complete and is qualified
in its entirety by the complete text of the 2025 Omnibus Plan.
Administration
Except as otherwise provided with respect
to actions or determinations by the Board, the 2025 Omnibus Plan is administered by the Committee, which is comprised of non-employee
members of the Board as defined in SEC Rule 16b-3, and who also satisfy the independence requirements prescribed by the NYSE, the exchange
on which the Company lists its Common Stock.
Eligibility
All of employees of Ingevity or any of
its subsidiaries and all non-employee directors are eligible to receive an award under the 2025 Omnibus Plan. The Committee has the sole
and complete authority to determine the participants to whom awards will be granted under the 2025 Omnibus Plan, subject to certain limitations
described below.
Types of Awards
Options to purchase shares of Common Stock,
stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), deferred stock units,
other stock-based awards (e.g., performance units), cash awards, and performance awards may be granted under the 2025 Omnibus
Plan. Options may be granted as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Code or nonqualified stock options.
Repricing and Exchanges
Repricing of options and SARs and the cancellation
of options and SARs in exchange for cash or other awards or options or SARs having a lower exercise price is prohibited under the 2025
Omnibus Plan without approval of our stockholders.
82 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Proposal 4
Description
of Principal Features of the 2025 Omnibus Plan
No Payment of Dividends
on Unvested Shares
The Committee may include provisions in
stock awards for the payment or crediting of dividends or dividend equivalents upon vesting of the award. However, no dividends or dividend
equivalents will be paid on unvested stock awards, including restricted stock or RSUs or performance units that may be settled in Ingevity
Common Stock, prior to vesting, and no dividends or dividend equivalents will be paid on options or SARs. Dividends and dividend equivalents
shall be subject to the same vesting, restriction, forfeiture and payment conditions as the
underlying awards.
Vesting Limitations
Except for (i) awards covering up to five
percent of the number of shares of Ingevity Common Stock reserved for issuance under the 2025 Omnibus Plan, (ii) annual awards to non-employee
directors that occur in connection with the annual meeting of the stockholders, (iii) replacement awards, (iv) awards granted in connection
with a corporate transaction and (v) awards that may be settled in cash, all awards must have a minimum vesting period of one year. Annual
awards to non-employee directors that occur in connection with the annual meeting of the stockholders may vest on the earlier of the
one-year anniversary of the date of the grant or the date of the next annual meeting of stockholders which is at least 50 weeks after
the immediately preceding year’s annual meeting.
Number of Shares Authorized
Under the 2025 Omnibus Plan, the aggregate
number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance (subject to adjustment provisions of the 2025 Omnibus Plan) shall not exceed
the Authorized Plan Shares. If an award is forfeited, terminates, expires or lapses without being exercised, or any award is settled
for cash, the number of shares previously subject to such award shall again be available for future grant.
Recoupment
Under the terms of the applicable award
agreements, Ingevity may recoup any cash or shares distributed under the 2025 Omnibus Plan if the participant breaches any of the restrictive
covenants contained in the applicable award agreement. In addition, all awards granted under the 2025 Omnibus Plan are subject to any
recoupment policy adopted or amended by Ingevity.
Award Limits
For our non-employee directors, the sum
of (i) the aggregate grant date fair value of all awards granted under the 2025 Omnibus Plan during a calendar year plus (ii) the total
amount payable in cash during such calendar year, may not exceed $750,000.
Description and Terms of
Awards
Options
An option provides a participant with the
right to purchase, within a specified period of time, a stated number of shares of Ingevity Common Stock at the exercise price specified
in the award agreement. The maximum term of an option granted under the 2025 Omnibus Plan will be ten years from the date of grant. The
exercise price per share paid by a participant will be determined by the Committee at the time of grant but will not be less than the
fair market value of one share of Ingevity Common Stock on the date the option is granted. Fair market value of a share will generally
mean the closing sales price on the NYSE (or other exchange on which the stock is traded). Payment in respect of the exercise of an option
may be made in cash or the Committee may, if the participant elects, allow such payment to be made by surrender of unrestricted shares
of Ingevity Common Stock which are otherwise deliverable on the date of exercise. The Committee may also allow such payment to be made
through a broker-assisted cashless exercise mechanism.
SARs
An SAR is a contractual right that allows
a participant to receive, either in the form of cash, shares of Ingevity Common Stock or a combination of the foregoing, the appreciation,
if any, in the value of one share of Ingevity Common Stock over a certain period of time. The exercise price per SAR paid by a participant
will be determined by the Committee at the time of grant but will not be less than the fair market value of one share of Ingevity Common
Stock on the date the SAR is granted. The maximum term of a SAR granted under the Plan will be ten years from the date of grant.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
93 |
Table of Contents
Proposal 4
Description
of Principal Features of the 2025 Omnibus Plan
Restricted Stock
An award of restricted stock is a grant
of shares subject to conditions and restrictions set by the Committee and specified in the applicable award agreement. The grant or vesting
of an award of restricted stock may be conditioned upon service to Ingevity or our affiliates or upon the attainment of performance goals
or other factors, as determined in the discretion of the Committee.
Restricted Stock Units
Upon the expiration of the vesting period
with respect to any RSUs, Ingevity will deliver to the participant (i) one share of Ingevity Common Stock or, at the discretion of the
Committee, an amount in cash equal to the fair market value of that number of shares at the expiration of the period over which the units
are to be earned for each vested RSU and (ii) if provided for in the award agreement, cash or shares of Ingevity Common Stock equal to
the dividend equivalents credited to the RSU.
Deferred Stock Units
A non-employee director is authorized,
to the extent permitted by our Board, the Non-Employee Deferred Compensation Plan and the Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy,
to defer payment of his or her compensation by electing to receive deferred stock units. If the director so elects, notional shares of
deferred stock units will be credited to the director and may be subject to vesting and forfeiture conditions as provided in the Non-Employee
Deferred Compensation Plan and the Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy. Each notional share credited to the director represents
the right to receive one share of Ingevity Common Stock on or as soon as practicable after the director’s termination from service
on our Board.
Other Stock-Based Awards
The Committee is authorized to grant other
awards of Ingevity Common Stock or other awards that are valued in whole or in part by reference to, or are otherwise based upon or settled
in, Ingevity Common Stock including, without limitation, unrestricted shares of Ingevity Common Stock or performance units.
Cash Awards
The Committee is authorized to grant cash
awards under the 2025 Omnibus Plan. Cash awards granted under such plan will be subject to the terms and conditions determined by the
Committee and specified in the applicable award agreement.
94 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Proposal 4
Description
of Principal Features of the 2025 Omnibus Plan
Performance Awards
The Committee may, in its discretion, grant
any award under the 2025 Omnibus Plan in the form of a performance award by conditioning the vesting of the award on the satisfaction
of certain performance goals. The Committee must establish performance goals, which may reference one or more of the following:
|
■
|
Contract awards; |
|
■ |
Backlog; |
|
■ |
Market share; |
|
■ |
Revenue; |
|
■ |
Sales; |
|
■ |
Day’s sales outstanding; |
|
■ |
Overhead |
|
■ |
Other expense management; |
|
■ |
Operating income; |
|
■ |
Operating income margin; |
|
■ |
Improvement in capital structure; |
|
■ |
Credit rating; |
|
■ |
Earnings (included in net earnings before taxes, earnings before interest and taxes and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation
and amortization); |
|
■ |
Earnings margin; |
|
■ |
Cash flow; |
|
■ |
Working capital; |
|
■ |
Book value per share; |
|
■ |
Return on stockholders’ equity; |
|
■ |
Return on investment or return on invested capital; |
|
■ |
Cash flow return on investment; |
|
■ |
Return on assets; |
|
■ |
Total stockholder return |
|
■ |
Economic profit; |
|
■ |
Stock price; |
|
■ |
Total contract value; |
|
■ |
Annual contract value; or |
|
■ |
Client satisfaction. |
The Committee may provide in any particular
performance award agreement that performance results may be adjusted to include or exclude particular factors, including but not limited
to any of the following events that occur during a performance period:
|
■ |
asset write-downs; |
|
■ |
litigation or claim judgments or settlements; |
|
■ |
the effect of changes in tax laws, accounting principles, or other laws or provisions affecting reported results; |
|
■ |
any reorganization or restructuring programs; |
|
■ |
unusual or infrequent items as described in applicable accounting guidance or in management’s discussion and analysis of
financial condition and results of operations appearing in the annual report to stockholders for the applicable year; |
|
■ |
acquisitions or divestitures; |
|
■ |
foreign exchange gains and losses; and |
|
■ |
settlement of hedging activities. |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
95 |
Table of Contents
Proposal 4
Description
of Principal Features of the 2025 Omnibus Plan
Change of Control
Double Trigger Event
Under the terms of the 2025 Omnibus Plan,
in the event of a change in control where the participant receives a “replacement award,” no accelerated vesting, exercisability
and/or payment of an outstanding award shall occur, unless on or after the occurrence of the change in control, the participant’s
employment is terminated without cause, other than as a result of death or disability, or the participant voluntarily resigns for good
reason. In such cases, upon the second trigger, holders of such awards will be entitled to accelerated vesting, will be exercisable and/or
will be settled.
In general, an award is considered a replacement
award if it is of the same type and of equal value to (as of the date of the change in control) the award it is replacing, contains terms
relating to vesting that are substantially similar to the award it is replacing, and has other terms and conditions that are not less
favorable to the participant than those of the award it is replacing (as of the date of the change in control).
Trigger Event if No Replacement
Award
If a participant does not receive a replacement
award, then upon the occurrence of a change in control, all outstanding options and SARs that have not vested in full shall be fully
vested and exercisable and all restrictions applicable to outstanding stock awards that are not performance awards will lapse in full
and the awards will be fully vested.
Performance Awards
Upon a change in control, all stock awards
that are performance awards will be considered earned and payable at their target value (or, if greater, the level of achievement, if
determinable, as of the date of the change in control) and prorated (if the change in control occurs during the performance period),
and will immediately be paid or settled, subject to the later settlement if required by Section 409A of the Code.
Assignability and Transfer
Generally, unless otherwise determined
by the Committee and expressly provided for in the applicable award agreement, no award may be assigned, alienated, pledged, sold or
otherwise transferred other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a domestic relations order issued by
a court of competent jurisdiction that is not contrary to the terms and conditions of the 2025 Omnibus Plan or applicable award agreement
and is in a form that is acceptable to the Committee.
Adjustments to Shares
In the event of changes in the outstanding
stock or capital structure of Ingevity (such as by reason of a stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, share
combination, recapitalization or other transactions or events as described in the 2025 Omnibus Plan), awards granted under the 2025 Omnibus
Plan as well as the maximum number of shares of Ingevity Common Stock which may be delivered pursuant to the Plan or to any one individual,
shall be subject to adjustment or substitution, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, as to the number, price or kind
of a share of Common Stock or other consideration subject to such award, or as otherwise determined by the Committee to be equitable.
In addition, upon the occurrence of certain corporate events or transactions (as described in the 2025 Omnibus Plan), such as a merger,
consolidation, or liquidation, the Committee may, in its discretion, cancel all outstanding awards and pay the holders thereof the value
of such awards in form and amount determined by the Committee or our Board, in its sole discretion, or provide for the substitution of
such awards.
Amendment or Termination
Our Board may amend, alter or discontinue
the Omnibus Plan at any time. No such action may be taken, however, without stockholder approval if such approval is necessary to comply
with any regulatory requirement and no such action that would impair any rights under any previous award will be effective without the
consent of the person to whom such award was made (unless the amendment is being made to comply with applicable law, stock exchange rules
or accounting rules). In addition, the Committee may amend the terms of any award granted under the Plan if the amendment would not impair
the rights of any participant without his or her consent or the amendment is being made to comply with applicable law, stock exchange
rules, or accounting rules.
If not terminated earlier, the 2025 Omnibus
Plan will have a term of ten years and no further awards may be granted under the 2025 Omnibus Plan after that date.
96 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Proposal 4
Description
of Principal Features of the 2025 Omnibus Plan
Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following is a general summary of the
material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the grant, exercise and vesting of awards under the 2025 Omnibus Plan and the disposition
of shares acquired pursuant to the exercise or settlement of such awards. It is intended to reflect the current provisions of the Code
and the regulations thereunder. This summary is not considered tax advice to any person and is not intended to be a complete statement
of applicable law, nor does it address foreign, state, local or payroll tax considerations. Moreover, the U.S. federal income tax consequences
to any particular participant may differ from those described herein by reason of, among other things, the particular circumstances of
such participant. Accordingly, participants in the Omnibus Plan should consult their respective tax advisors to determine the tax consequences
of their participation.
Options
The Code requires that, for treatment of
an option as a qualified option, shares of Ingevity Common Stock acquired through the exercise of a qualified option cannot be disposed
of before the later of (i) two years from the date of grant of the option, or (ii) one year from the date of exercise. Holders of
qualified options will generally incur no federal income tax liability at the time of grant or upon exercise of those options. However,
the spread at exercise will be an “item of tax preference,” which may give rise to “alternative minimum tax”
liability for the taxable year in which the exercise occurs. If the holder does not dispose of the shares before two years following
the date of grant and one year following the date of exercise, the difference between the exercise price and the amount realized upon
disposition of the shares will constitute long-term capital gain or loss, as the case may be. Assuming both holding periods are satisfied,
no deduction will be allowed to us for federal income tax purposes in connection with the grant or exercise of the qualified option.
If, within two years following the date of grant or within one year following the date of exercise, the holder of shares acquired through
the exercise of a qualified option disposes of those shares, the participant will generally realize taxable compensation at the time
of such disposition equal to the difference between the exercise price and the lesser of the fair market value of the share on the date
of exercise or the amount realized on the subsequent disposition of the shares, and that amount will generally be deductible by us for
federal income tax purposes, subject to the possible limitations on deductibility under Sections 280G and 162(m) of the Code for compensation
paid to executives designated in those Sections. Finally, if an otherwise qualified option becomes first exercisable in any one year
for shares having an aggregate value in excess of $100,000 (based on the grant date value), the portion of the qualified option
in respect of those excess shares will be treated as a nonqualified stock option for federal income tax purposes.
No income will be realized by a participant
upon grant of a nonqualified stock option. Upon the exercise of a nonqualified stock option, the participant will recognize ordinary
compensation income in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the underlying exercised shares over the option
exercise price paid at the time of exercise, and the participant’s tax basis will equal the sum of the compensation income recognized
and the exercise price. Ingevity will be able to deduct this same amount for U.S. federal income tax purposes, but such deduction may
be limited under Sections 280G and 162(m) of the Code for compensation paid to certain executives designated in those Sections. In the
event of a sale of shares received upon the exercise of a nonqualified stock option, any appreciation or depreciation after the exercise
date generally will be taxed as capital gain or loss and will be long-term gain or loss if the holding period for such shares is more
than one year.
SARs
No income will be realized by a participant
upon grant of a SAR. Upon the exercise of a SAR, the participant will recognize ordinary compensation income in an amount equal to the
fair market value of the payment received in respect of the SAR. We will be able to deduct this same amount for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, but such deduction may be limited under Sections 280G and 162(m) of the Code for compensation paid to certain executives designated
in those Sections.
Restricted Stock
A participant will not be subject to tax
upon the grant of an award of restricted stock unless the participant otherwise elects to be taxed at the time of grant pursuant to Section
83(b) of the Code. On the date an award of restricted stock becomes transferable or is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture,
the participant will have taxable compensation equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares on that date over
the amount the participant paid for such shares, if any, unless the participant made an election under Section 83(b) of the Code to be
taxed at the time of grant. If the participant made an election under Section 83(b), the participant will have taxable compensation at
the time of grant equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant over the amount the participant
paid for such shares, if any. If the election is made, the participant will not be allowed a deduction for the value of any shares which
may be subsequently forfeited. Special rules apply to the receipt and disposition of restricted shares received by officers and directors
who are subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act. Ingevity will be able to deduct, at the same time as it is recognized by the participant,
the amount of taxable compensation to the participant for U.S. federal income tax purposes, but such deduction may be limited under Sections
280G and 162(m) of the Code for compensation paid to certain executives designated in those Sections.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
97 |
Table of Contents
Proposal 4
Recommendation
of the Board
Restricted Stock Units
A participant will not be subject to tax
upon the grant of a restricted stock unit award. Rather, upon the delivery of shares or cash pursuant to a restricted stock unit award,
the participant will have taxable compensation equal to the fair market value of the number of shares (or the amount of cash) the participant
actually receives with respect to the award. Ingevity will be able to deduct the amount of taxable compensation to the participant for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, but the deduction may be limited under Sections 280G and 162(m) of the Code for compensation paid to
certain executives designated in those Sections.
Plan Benefits
Because awards under the 2025 Omnibus Plan
are determined by the Committee in its discretion, it is not possible to predict the awards that will be made to particular employees
or non-employee directors in the future.
Vote Required
An affirmative vote of the majority of
the shares of Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on this proposal is required
to approve the 2025 Omnibus Plan.
Recommendation
of the Board
 |
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS
A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE 2025 OMNIBUS PLAN. |
98 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Ownership of Equity Securities
Principal stock owners
The following table lists any person (including
any “group” as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) who, to our knowledge, was the beneficial owner
as of February 26, 2025, of more than 5% of our outstanding Common Stock.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Amount of
Common
Stock
Beneficially
Owned |
|
Percentage of
our Common
Stock |
|
Sole Voting
Shares |
|
Shared Voting
Shares |
|
Sole
Investment
Shares |
|
Shared
Investment
Shares |
BlackRock, Inc.(1)
55 East 52nd Street
New York, New York 10055 |
|
6,003,674 |
|
16.6% |
|
5,934,518 |
|
|
|
6,003,674 |
|
|
The Vanguard Group(2)
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355 |
|
4,210,511 |
|
11.58% |
|
|
|
66,014 |
|
4,103,910 |
|
106,601 |
Wellington Management Group LLP(3)
c/o Wellington Management Company LLP
280 Congress Street
Boston, MA 02210 |
|
2,148,379 |
|
5.93% |
|
|
|
1,905,361 |
|
|
|
2,148,379 |
(1) |
Information provided is based solely on an amendment to Schedule 13G filed
on January 22, 2024. |
(2) |
Information provided is based solely on an amendment to Schedule 13G filed on November 12, 2024.
|
(3) |
Information provided is based solely on a Schedule 13G filed on February 8, 2024. |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
99 |
Table of Contents
Ownership
of Equity Securities
Executive Officers and Directors
Executive
Officers and Directors
The
following table shows how much of our Common Stock our current directors, NEOs, and all executive officers and directors as a group beneficially
owned as of March 3, 2025. Beneficial ownership is a technical term broadly defined by the SEC to mean more than ownership in the usual
sense. In general, beneficial ownership includes any shares of Common Stock a director or officer can vote or transfer and any security
the director or officer has the right to vote or transfer within 60 days. Except as described further below, each stockholder listed
in the table has sole voting and investment power for all shares of Common Stock shown as beneficially owned by him or her. Each
individual director and executive officer owns less than 1% of the shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 3, 2025(1).
Excluding Mr. Fortson, who departed the Company as of October 2, 2024, directors and executive officers as a group beneficially own less than 1% of the Common Stock outstanding
as of March 3, 2025. Including Mr. Fortson, directors and executive officers as a group beneficially own approximately 1.2% of the Common Stock outstanding as of March 3, 2025.
Name
of Beneficial Owner |
|
Common
Stock
Beneficially
Owned(2) |
|
Stock
Vesting
within 60
Days |
|
Options
Exercisable
within 60
Days |
|
Total
Common
Stock
Beneficially
Owned(2) |
|
Vested
but
Unsettled DSUs
(including vesting
within 60 days)
(“Vested DSUs”)(3) |
|
Total
Common
Stock
Beneficially
Owned Plus
Vested
DSUs(2) |
Independent
Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean S. Blackwell |
|
17,502 |
|
2,800 |
|
— |
|
20,302 |
|
— |
|
20,302 |
Diane H. Gulyas |
|
9,774 |
|
2,800 |
|
— |
|
12,574 |
|
— |
|
12,574 |
Bruce D. Hoechner |
|
1,971 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
1,971 |
|
2,800 |
|
4,771 |
Frederick J. Lynch |
|
19,502 |
|
2,800 |
|
— |
|
22,302 |
|
— |
|
22,302 |
Karen G. Narwold |
|
2,695 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
2,695 |
|
10,244 |
|
12,939 |
Daniel F. Sansone |
|
10,209 |
|
2,800 |
|
— |
|
13,009 |
|
4,995 |
|
18,004 |
J. Kevin Willis |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
1,089 |
|
1,089 |
Benjamin G. Wright |
|
3,187 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
3,187 |
|
2,800 |
|
3,187 |
Executive
Officers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luis Fernandez-Moreno |
|
19,552 |
|
2,800 |
|
— |
|
22,352 |
|
— |
|
22,352 |
Mary Dean Hall |
|
19,641 |
|
— |
|
9,834 |
|
29,475 |
|
— |
|
29,475 |
S. Edward Woodcock |
|
24,224 |
|
— |
|
26,271 |
|
50,495 |
|
— |
|
50,495 |
Richard A. White |
|
7,015 |
|
— |
|
5,592 |
|
12,607 |
|
— |
|
12,607 |
Ryan C. Fisher |
|
5,650 |
|
— |
|
6,041 |
|
11,691 |
|
— |
|
11,691 |
John C. Fortson(4) |
|
90,615 |
|
— |
|
102,832 |
|
193,447 |
|
— |
|
193,447 |
Stacy L. Cozad(5) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
Directors
and Officers as a group (17 persons) |
|
232,799 |
|
14,000 |
|
152,034 |
|
398,833 |
|
21,928 |
|
420,761 |
(1) |
As of March 3, 2025, there were 36,439,270 shares of Common Stock outstanding. |
(2) |
Includes shares of Common Stock held directly
and indirectly. |
(3) |
For information on DSU vesting, voting rights,
and payment, please see “Director Compensation,” above. |
(4) |
Mr. Fortson departed the Company as of October 2, 2024. The holdings reported here are based solely on his holdings of Company stock as of such date. |
(5) |
Ms. Cozad departed the Company as of July 26, 2024. The holdings reported here are based solely on the Form 144 filed by Ms. Cozad with the SEC on August 19, 2024. |
Delinquent Section 16(a)
reports
To the Company’s knowledge, based
solely on a review of the copies of the reports furnished to the Company and the reporting persons’ written representations that
no additional reports were required, the Company believes that, during 2024, all persons required to report complied with the Section
16(a) requirements.
100 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Questions and Answers About
the Annual Meeting, Proxy Solicitation, and Voting Information
Why did I receive these
materials?
You received these materials (the “Proxy Materials”) because you owned shares of the Company’s Common Stock,
par value $0.01 (the “Common Stock”) as of the close of business on March 3, 2025 (the “Record Date”)
and are, therefore, entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
What is included in the
Proxy Materials?
The Proxy Materials include the Notice
of the Annual Meeting, the Proxy Statement, and our Annual Report. These materials provide you with important information about the Company,
the Annual Meeting, and the proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting.
Who is Vision One and how
are they involved in the Annual Meeting?
Vision
One is a shareholder that purports to beneficially own approximately 1.15% of the Company’s outstanding stock as of March 5, 2025. Vision One has notified
the Company that it has nominated certain individuals for election as directors at the Annual Meeting in opposition to the nominees
recommended by the Board. The Board unanimously does NOT endorse any of the nominees for director submitted by Vision One and unanimously
recommends that you vote “FOR” each of the nine highly qualified nominees proposed by our Board (Jean S. Blackwell, Luis Fernandez-Moreno, Diane H. Gulyas, Bruce D. Hoechner, Frederick J. Lynch, Karen G.
Narwold, Daniel F. Sansone, J. Kevin Willis, and Benjamin G. Wright) on the enclosed WHITE proxy card or WHITE voting instruction form.
You may receive solicitation materials
from Vision One, including proxy statements and gold proxy cards. Ingevity is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness
of any information provided by or on behalf of Vision One or its nominees or any other statements Vision One may make. We strongly urge
you to discard and NOT to vote using any gold proxy card sent to you by Vision One. If you have already submitted a gold proxy card sent to you by, or on behalf of, Vision One, you can revoke such proxy and vote for the Board’s nominees and on
the other matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting by marking, signing and dating the enclosed WHITE proxy card or WHITE voting instruction form and returning
it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope or by using the information on the WHITE proxy card or WHITE voting instruction
form or notice to vote via the Internet or telephone by otherwise following the instructions on your WHITE proxy card or WHITE voting instruction form. Only your latest validly executed proxy will count, and any proxy may be revoked at any time prior to its
exercise at the Annual Meeting as described in the accompanying proxy statement. If you have any questions or need assistance voting, please call Innisfree M&A Incorporated, the Company’s proxy solicitor,
at (877) 687-1874 (toll-free from the U.S. and Canada) or +1 (412) 232-3651 from other countries.
What is a proxy and a proxy
statement?
A proxy is your legal designation of another
person to vote the shares of Common Stock you own as of the Record Date in the manner you direct. The person you designate to vote your
shares of Common Stock is called a proxy. If you designate someone as your proxy in a written document, that document also is called
a proxy or a proxy card. We have designated Ryan C. Fisher, our Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary, and Mavis G. Huger,
our Assistant General Counsel and Assistant Secretary, to serve as proxies for the Annual Meeting. The proxies also may be voted at any
adjournments or postponements of the meeting. The Board is soliciting proxies for use at the Annual Meeting. A proxy statement is a document
we give you when we are soliciting your vote pursuant to SEC regulations.
Is the Company using a
universal proxy card in connection with voting at the Annual Meeting?
Yes. The SEC has adopted rules requiring
the use of a universal proxy card in contested director elections that took effect on August 31, 2022. Although Ingevity is required
to include all nominees for election on its universal proxy card, Ingevity does not endorse any of the Vision One Nominees and unanimously
recommends shareholders vote ONLY “FOR” each of the nine nominees recommended by the Board and using the WHITE proxy
card or WHITE voting instruction form.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
101 |
Table of Contents
Questions and Answers About
the Annual Meeting, Proxy Solicitation, and Voting Information
Why have I received different
color proxy cards?
As discussed above, Vision One has notified
us that it has nominated two candidates for election as directors at the Annual Meeting. The Board has sent you the enclosed WHITE proxy card or WHITE voting instruction form. Vision One may send you a gold proxy card. The Board recommends you use the enclosed WHITE proxy card or WHITE voting instruction form
to vote “FOR” only the nine nominees proposed by the Board for election as directors. The Board also recommends that you
disregard and discard any gold proxy cards you receive.
Please
note that instructing to vote “WITHHOLD” with respect to either of the Vision One nominees on a gold proxy card is not the
same as voting “FOR” the nine Board nominees because any vote using the gold proxy card will revoke any WHITE proxy you previously submitted. Even though you can vote for the Board nominees on the gold proxy card, we urge you to support our director nominees and vote “FOR” the election of ONLY the nine nominees recommended by the using the WHITE proxy card.
If
you have already submitted a gold proxy card sent to you by, or on behalf of, Vision One, you can revoke such proxy and
vote for the Board’s nominees and on the other matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting by marking, signing and dating the
enclosed WHITE proxy card and returning it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope or by using the information on the WHITE proxy card or WHITE voting instruction form or notice to vote via the Internet or telephone by otherwise following the instructions on your WHITE proxy card, or WHITE voting instruction form. Only your latest validly executed proxy will count, and any proxy may be revoked at any time prior to its exercise at the Annual Meeting as described in the accompanying proxy statement.
What is the difference
between a stockholder of record and a beneficial owner?
If your shares of Common Stock are registered
in your name on the books and records of our transfer agent, you are a “stockholder of record.” We therefore sent the Proxy Materials directly to you.
If your shares of Common Stock are held
for you in the name of your broker or bank, your shares are held in “street name” and you are considered the “beneficial
owner” of your shares and the broker or bank is considered to be the stockholder of record.
If you are a beneficial owner, the Proxy Materials have been forwarded to you by the broker or bank that holds your shares of Common Stock, and, as the beneficial owner,
you have the right to direct your broker or bank on how to vote your shares by following the instructions on the WHITE proxy card or WHITE voting instruction form for voting on the Internet or by telephone
(if made available by your bank or broker with respect to any shares you hold in street name), or by completing and returning the WHITE voting instruction form, and the bank or broker is required to vote your shares in accordance with your instructions.
Brokers are not permitted to vote on certain proposals unless you provide voting instructions. Voting your shares will help to ensure that your interests are represented at the meeting. See “What is the effect of broker non-votes” for more information below.
How do I vote?
Your voting method depends on whether you
are a stockholder of record or a beneficial owner.
Stockholder
of record
If you are a stockholder of record, you
may vote using one of the following methods:
 |
 |
 |
 |
ONLINE |
BY
PHONE |
BY
MAIL |
DURING
THE VIRTUAL MEETING |
Vote online using the control number on your WHITE proxy card at www.proxyvotenow.com/NGVT |
Locate
the control number on your WHITE proxy card to vote by calling the toll free number indicated |
Mark, date and sign your WHITE proxy card and return it in the enclosed postage pre-paid envelope |
See “Questions
and Answers about the Annual Meeting, Proxy Solicitation, and Voting Information” for details on how to virtually attend
and vote during the meeting at www.cesonlineservices.com/ngvt25_vm |
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual
Meeting virtually, we strongly urge you to review the proxy materials carefully and to use your WHITE proxy card to vote online, by phone or by mail in advance of the Annual Meeting as
promptly as possible.
102 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Questions and Answers About
the Annual Meeting, Proxy Solicitation, and Voting Information
Beneficial owner
If you are a beneficial owner, you may
vote by following the instructions on the voting instruction form or notice provided to you by the bank or broker that holds your shares. Beneficial owners who want to attend and also vote in person at the Annual Meeting will need to obtain a legal proxy, in PDF or Image (gif, jpg or png) file format, from the organization that holds their shares giving them the right to vote their shares in person at the Annual Meeting and include it with their online ballot during the meeting.
May I revoke my proxy and
change my vote?
If you are a stockholder of record, you
may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the polls close at the Annual Meeting by doing one of the following:
|
■ |
Voting again by telephone or via the Internet prior to 11:59 p.m.,
Eastern Time, on April 29, 2025; |
|
■ |
Giving written notice to the Corporate Secretary of the Company; |
|
■ |
Delivering a later-dated proxy to the Company; or |
|
■ |
Voting during the Annual Meeting by completing and submitting a ballot that will be available on the
meeting website, www.cesonlineservices.com/ngvt25_vm. |
If you are a beneficial owner, please check
your WHITE voting instruction form or contact the bank or broker that holds your shares for instructions on how to revoke or change
your voting instruction. If you have already voted using a gold proxy card sent to you by Vision One, you have every right
to change your vote and we strongly urge you to revoke that proxy by using the WHITE proxy card or WHITE voting instruction form to vote in favor of only the nine
nominees recommended by the Board – by Internet, telephone or by signing, dating and returning the enclosed WHITE proxy
card or WHITE voting instruction form.
Who is entitled to vote
at the Annual Meeting?
All Ingevity stockholders who owned Common
Stock as of the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
How many votes are entitled
to be cast at the Annual Meeting?
Each Ingevity stockholder is entitled to
one vote for each share of Common Stock owned as of the Record Date. There were 36,439,270 shares of Common Stock outstanding
on the Record Date. There is no cumulative voting.
When and where is the Annual
Meeting, and how may I attend?
In order to allow greater access to the
meeting to our stockholders and lower the barriers to stockholder participation, our Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting
format only with no physical meeting location, which will enable stockholders to participate from any location and at no cost.
To participate in the virtual meeting,
you should register in advance at www.cesonlineservices.com/ngvt25_vm by 11:59 PM (Eastern Time) on April 28, 2025. Please have your WHITE proxy card, or WHITE voting instruction form, or other communication containing your control number available and follow the instructions to complete your registration request. The meeting will begin promptly at 9:30 a.m., Eastern Time, and we encourage stockholders
to access the meeting prior to the start time.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
103 |
Table of Contents
Questions and Answers About
the Annual Meeting, Proxy Solicitation, and Voting Information
How may I ask a question
during the Annual Meeting?
We are committed to ensuring that stockholders
will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate in the Annual Meeting as they would at an in-person meeting. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting online, submit questions, and
vote electronically during the meeting by visiting www.cesonlineservices.com/ngvt25_vm.
We will try to answer as many stockholder-submitted
questions as time permits, and in the event we receive more questions than we can answer during our allotted period of time, we will
answer them in the order received. We reserve the right to edit profanity or other inappropriate language and to exclude questions regarding
topics that are not pertinent to meeting matters or Company business, or that do not comply with the Annual Meeting rules of conduct.
If we receive substantially similar questions, we may group such questions together and provide a single response to avoid repetition.
To the extent you have a question that was not answered during the Annual Meeting, please contact our Investor Relations team at investors@ingevity.com.
What if I have technical
or other “IT” problems logging into or participating in the Annual Meeting webcast?
All stockholders who register to attend
the Annual Meeting will receive an email prior to the Annual Meeting containing the contact details of technical support in the event
they encounter difficulties accessing the virtual meeting or during the meeting. Stockholders are encouraged to contact technical support
if they encounter any technical difficulties with the meeting webcast. In the event of any technical disruptions that prevent the chair
from hosting the Annual Meeting within 30 minutes of the date and time set forth above, the meeting may be adjourned or postponed.
How many votes must be
present to hold the Annual Meeting?
In order for us to conduct the Annual Meeting,
a majority of the shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the Record Date must be present at the meeting (including by proxy). This
is referred to as a quorum. If a share is represented for any matter at the Annual Meeting, it is deemed to be present for quorum purposes.
Abstentions and shares of Common Stock held of record by a bank or broker or its nominee (“Broker Shares”) that are voted
on any matter are included in determining the number of shares present at the Annual Meeting. However, broker non-votes that are not voted on any of the proposals will not be included
in determining whether a quorum is present at such meeting.
104 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Questions
and Answers About the Annual Meeting, Proxy Solicitation, and Voting Information
What proposals will be
voted on at the Annual Meeting, what are the Board’s voting recommendations, and what is required for a proposal to pass?
The following table summarizes the Board’s
voting recommendations for each proposal, the vote required for each proposal to pass, and the effect of abstentions and uninstructed
shares on each proposal. If you are a stockholder of record who submits a proxy card without selecting an option for any of the proposals,
the proxy holders will vote in accordance with the Board recommendations in the table below.
Proposal |
|
Description |
|
Board
Voting
Recommendation |
|
Vote
Required to
Pass(1) |
|
Effect
of
Abstentions on
Votes Cast(2) |
|
Effect
of
Broker
Non-votes(3) |
1 |
|
Election of Nine Directors |
|
FOR
each Board nominee |
|
See note 1 below |
|
None |
|
None |
2 |
|
Advisory Vote on Compensation of our Named Executive Officers (Say-On-Pay) |
|
FOR |
|
Majority of shares present and entitled to vote thereon |
|
Counts as a vote against the proposal |
|
None |
3 |
|
Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting
firm for 2024 |
|
FOR |
|
Majority of shares present and entitled to vote thereon |
|
Counts as a vote against the proposal |
|
Broker may vote in its discretion to the extent the beneficial owner has not been provided with Vision One’s proxy materials |
4 |
|
Approval of 2025 Omnibus Incentive Plan |
|
FOR |
|
Majority of shares present and entitled to vote thereon |
|
Counts as a vote against the proposal |
|
None |
(1) |
For Proposal 1,
directors will be elected on a plurality basis. This means that the nine director nominees receiving the greatest number of votes
cast “FOR” their election will be elected. For Proposals 2-4, “shares present and entitled to vote
thereon” includes abstentions. For Proposal 3, “shares present ” includes Broker Shares that may be voted on such
proposal in certain situations absent your instructions, as further described in note 3 below. |
(2) |
Abstentions will have no effect on the election of directors (Proposal 1). For each of the other proposals (Proposals 2, 3 and 4), abstentions will be treated as shares present and entitled to vote for quorum purposes, but they will have the same practical effect as votes against the proposal because they require approval by the majority of the shares present and entitled to vote thereon. |
(3) |
Brokers only have authority to vote in their discretion for routine matters, as determined by the rules of the NYSE. All of the proposals, except for Proposal 3, are considered non-routine matters. If you are a beneficial owner holding shares through a broker and you do not specify a choice to your broker for a non-routine proposal, the broker is not entitled to vote in its discretion. In contrast, Proposal 3 is normally considered a “routine” matter and would normally be the only proposal at the Annual Meeting with respect to which your broker could vote your shares absent your instructions. However, to the extent your broker provides you with Vision One’s proxy materials, your broker will not have discretion to vote on "routine" matters, including Proposal 3. In such circumstances, if you do not instruct your broker on how to vote your shares, then your shares may not be voted on any of Proposals 1, 2, 3 or 4. We urge you to instruct your broker about how you wish your shares to be voted using the WHITE voting instruction form. |
Who counts the votes?
We have retained First Coast Results, Inc. (“First Coast”) to serve as independent inspector of election. In such capacity, First Coast will count, tabulate and certify votes at the Annual Meeting.
What happens if Vision
One withdraws or abandons its solicitation or fails to comply with the universal proxy rules and I already granted proxy authority in
favor of Vision One and its control slate?
If Vision One withdraws or abandons its
solicitation or fails to comply with the universal proxy rules, any votes cast in favor of Vision One’s director nominees will
be disregarded and not be counted, whether such vote is provided on the Company’s WHITE proxy card or Vision One’s
gold proxy card.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
105 |
Table of Contents
Questions and Answers About
the Annual Meeting, Proxy Solicitation, and Voting Information
Stockholders are encouraged to submit their
votes on the WHITE proxy card or WHITE voting instruction form. If Vision One withdraws or abandons its solicitation or fails to comply with the universal proxy
rules after a stockholder has already granted proxy authority, stockholders can still sign and date a later submitted WHITE proxy
card or WHITE voting instruction form.
Will there be any other
matters of business addressed at the Annual Meeting?
As of the date of this Proxy Statement,
we are not aware of any other matter that will be properly brought before the Annual Meeting. If other matters are properly introduced,
the persons named in the proxy as the proxy holders will vote on such matters in their discretion using their best judgment.
What is the effect of abstentions?
Abstentions will have no effect on the election of directors (Proposal 1). For each of the other proposals (Proposals 2, 3 and 4),
abstentions will be treated as shares present and entitled to vote for quorum purposes, but they will have the same practical effect as votes against the proposal because they require approval by the majority of the shares present and entitled to vote thereon.
What is the effect of broker non-votes?
A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker lacks discretionary authority to vote on a “non-routine” proposal and a beneficial owner fails to give the broker voting instructions on that matter. The rules of the NYSE determine whether matters presented at the Annual Meeting are “routine” or “non-routine” in nature. Proposals 1, 2 and 4 are considered “non-routine” matters. This means that beneficial owners who hold their shares in street name must provide voting instructions to their broker in order for their broker to vote their shares on these matters. In contrast, Proposal 3 is normally considered a “routine” matter under the rules of the NYSE and would normally be the only proposal at the Annual Meeting with respect to which your broker could vote your shares absent your instructions, which vote if cast would be counted for purposes of calculating whether a quorum is present. However, to the extent your broker provides you with Vision One’s proxy materials, your broker will not have discretion to vote on “routine” matters, including Proposal 3. In such circumstances, if you do not instruct your broker on how to vote your shares, then your shares may not be voted on any of Proposals 1, 2, 3 or 4. We urge you to instruct your broker about how you wish your shares to be voted using the WHITE voting instruction form.
What if I return my WHITE proxy but don’t vote for any or some of the matters listed on my proxy card?
If you return a signed WHITE proxy card without indicating your vote (and the proxy is not revoked), your shares will be voted “FOR” the election of all nominees for directors recommended by our Board (Proposal 1), “FOR” Proposal 2, “FOR” Proposal 3 and “FOR” Proposal 4.
What if I give voting instructions for fewer than nine candidates or for more than nine candidates?
You are permitted to vote for fewer than nine nominees for director. If you vote for fewer than nine nominees for director, your shares will only be voted “FOR” those nominees you have so marked. No discretionary authority is available to vote shares represented by an undervoted proxy card for the remaining director seats up for election.
If you are a registered holder and submit a validly executed proxy card but vote “FOR” more than nine nominees, all of your votes with respect to the election of directors will be invalid and will not be counted. Votes on other matters included on the proxy card for which there is no overvote can be counted, and can be counted for purposes of determining a quorum.
Who bears the expenses
of solicitation?
We will bear the cost of solicitation of
proxies by the Board in connection with the Annual Meeting. We will reimburse brokers, fiduciaries, and custodians for reasonable expenses
incurred by them in forwarding Proxy Materials to beneficial owners of Common Stock held in their names. Proxies
may be solicited by mail, in person, by telephone, facsimile, or other means of communication by our officers and other employees. These
people will receive no additional compensation for these services but will be reimbursed for any expenses incurred by them in connection
with these services. In addition, Appendix C sets forth information pertaining to certain of Ingevity’s officers, directors, and
employees who are considered to be “participants” in Ingevity’s solicitation of proxies under SEC rules. These “participants”
will receive no additional or special compensation for such work.
106 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Questions and Answers About
the Annual Meeting, Proxy Solicitation, and Voting Information
As a result of the proxy solicitation of
Vision One, we will incur additional costs in connection with the solicitation of proxies. We have retained Innisfree M&A Incorporated
for certain advisory and proxy solicitation services for an aggregate fee of approximately $800,000, together with reimbursement
of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for these services, and Innisfree M&A Incorporated expects that approximately 50 of
their employees will assist in the solicitation. In addition, the Company has agreed to indemnify Innisfree M&A Incorporated against certain losses arising out of, or relating to, the engagement. Excluding amounts that we would have expended for a solicitation in an election of directors
in the absence of a contested election, and excluding the compensation of our directors and partners involved in the solicitation, the
aggregate expenses are estimated to be approximately $3.7 million, approximately $761,000 of which has been incurred (or
accrued) to date. These expenses, which are estimates that may change, include the fees of Innisfree M&A Incorporated, outside counsel
and other advisors, as well as retaining an independent inspector of election.
Where can I find more information about the Vision One Nominees?
Vision One’s proxy statement is required to include certain information about the Vision One Nominees, including information concerning material proceedings in which the Vision One Nominees are adverse to the Company or have an interest adverse to the Company, biographical information, arrangements with the Vision One Nominees pursuant to which they were selected as director nominees, transactions between the Company and the Vision One Nominees, and information concerning the independence of the Vision One Nominees. You may access Vision One’s proxy solicitation materials and other relevant documents, without cost, via the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. We are not responsible for the accuracy of any information provided by or relating to Vision One or the Vision One Nominees contained in any proxy solicitation materials filed or disseminated by, or on behalf of, Vision One or any other statements that Vision One may otherwise make.
What is Ingevity’s
principal executive office address?
The address of Ingevity’s principal
executive office is: 4920 O’Hear Avenue, Suite 400, North Charleston, South Carolina 29405.
Do the Company’s officers and directors have any interest in any of the matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting?
Each of the Board nominees has an interest in Proposal 1 because they are each currently a member of the Board of Directors and receive compensation for such service. Our executive officers have an interest in Proposal 2 as compensation for some of our executive officers is subject to this vote. Members of the Board and our executive officers do not have any interest in Proposal 3. Members of the Board and our executive officers have an interest in Proposal 4, as shares utilized for equity compensation for some of our executive officers and directors are, or may be in the future, subject to this vote. For additional information, please see the section entitled “Appendix C: Supplemental Information Regarding Participants in the Solicitation.”
What is “householding”
and how does it affect me?
“Householding” refers to a
procedure allowed by the SEC to reduce the number of copies of the Proxy Materials mailed to holders of our Common Stock residing
at the same address. Under this procedure, we will deliver one set of printed Proxy Materials to beneficial holders of
our Common Stock residing at the same address, unless their broker, bank, or other nominee has received contrary instructions from any
beneficial holder at that address. Likewise, we will deliver one set of printed Proxy Materials to record holders of our
Common Stock residing at the same address, unless we receive instructions from such stockholders to the contrary. If you reside at the
same address as other stockholders of record and would like to receive a separate set of Proxy Materials, please contact us
at 1-844-643-8489 (1-84-INGEVITY) or at Ingevity Corporation, 4920 O’Hear Avenue, Suite 400, North Charleston, South Carolina 29405,
Attn: Corporate Secretary, and we will promptly deliver a separate set to you. If you and other stockholders of record residing at the
same address received multiple sets of the Proxy Materials and would like to receive a single set in the future,
please contact us as described above. Beneficial holders with questions about combined mailings should contact the bank or broker holding
their shares.
When will the voting results
from the Annual Meeting be disclosed?
The Company will file a Current Report
on Form 8-K with the SEC and post the filing to the Company’s website within four business days following the Annual Meeting. In the event the results disclosed in the Form 8-K are preliminary, we will subsequently amend the Form 8-K to report the final voting results within four business days of the date that such results are known.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
107 |
Table of Contents
Questions and Answers Regarding Stockholder Communications,
Stockholder Proposals, and Company Documents
How can I obtain copies of Ingevity’s
Annual Report?
We will provide without charge, at the written request of any stockholder
of record as of the Record Date, a copy of our Annual Report, including the financial statements, as filed with the SEC, excluding
exhibits. We will provide copies of the exhibits to eligible stockholders making such a request.
Requests for copies of our Annual Report should be mailed to: Ingevity
Corporation, 4920 O’Hear Avenue, Suite 400, North Charleston, South Carolina 29405, Attn: Corporate Secretary. You
may also access a copy of our Annual Report via the Internet by visiting www.proxyvotenow.com/NGVT.
How do I submit a proposal for inclusion in
next year’s proxy statement?
Under SEC rules, a proposal that a stockholder wishes to include in our
proxy statement for the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders must be received by our Corporate Secretary no later than the close
of business on November 18, 2025. Proposals must be in writing and delivered to: Ingevity Corporation, 4920 O’Hear Avenue,
Suite 400, North Charleston, South Carolina 29405, Attn: Corporate Secretary. In addition, proposals must otherwise comply with
the requirements of Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act. Accordingly, stockholders wishing to submit a proposal should refer to Rule
14a-8 of the Exchange Act, which sets standards for eligibility and specifies the types of proposals that are not appropriate
for inclusion in our proxy statement.
How do I nominate a director for election at
next year’s annual meeting of stockholders?
Under our Bylaws, any stockholder of record may nominate persons for
election as directors at an annual meeting of our stockholders by providing written notice of their intent to do so to our Corporate
Secretary no later than the close of business on the 90th day, nor earlier than the close of business on the 120th day, prior
to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. If the annual meeting is held on a date that is more than
30 days before, or more than 60 days after, such anniversary, then such notice must instead be provided no earlier than the close
of business on the 120th day prior to the meeting and no later than the close of business on the later of: (i) the 90th day prior
to the meeting; or (ii) the seventh day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the meeting is first made
by the Company. We anticipate holding our 2026 annual meeting of stockholders on or about the one-year anniversary of this year’s
meeting. This means that written notice of any nominations intended to be made at our 2026 annual meeting of stockholders must
be delivered to our Corporate Secretary no earlier than the close of business on December 31, 2025 and no later than the close
of business on January 30, 2026. Any such notice must contain the information and conform to the requirements specified in our
Bylaws. In addition, the Company will only consider nominations from a stockholder who is a stockholder of record: (i) at the
time of giving such notice; (ii) on the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting;
and (iii) at the time of the annual meeting.
In addition to the requirements in the preceding paragraph, stockholders
who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than Ingevity’s nominees through the use of a “universal
proxy card” must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 of the Exchange Act no later than
March 1, 2026, which is 60 days prior to April 30, 2026, the one-year anniversary of the Annual Meeting.
108 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Questions and Answers Regarding Stockholder Communications,
Stockholder Proposals, and Company Documents
How do I bring other business before next year’s
annual meeting of stockholders?
Under our Bylaws, any stockholder of record who wishes to present a matter
for consideration (other than the nomination of a director or matters that have been submitted for inclusion in our proxy statement
for such annual meeting) at an annual meeting of our stockholders must provide written notice of their intent to do so to our
Corporate Secretary no later than the close of business on the 90th day, nor earlier than the close of business on the 120th day,
prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. If the annual meeting is held on a date that is more
than 30 days before, or more than 60 days after, such anniversary, then such notice must instead be provided no earlier than the
close of business on the 120th day prior to the meeting and no later than the close of business on the later of: (i) the 90th
day prior to the meeting; or (ii) the seventh day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the meeting is
first made by the Company. We anticipate holding our 2026 annual meeting of stockholders on or about the one-year anniversary
of this year’s meeting. This means that any notice regarding matters to be presented at our 2026 annual meeting of stockholders
must be delivered to our Corporate Secretary no earlier than the close of business on December 31, 2025 and no later than the
close of business on January 30, 2026. Any such notice must contain the information and conform to the requirements specified
in our Bylaws.
In addition, the Company will only consider proposals from a stockholder
who is a stockholder of record: (i) at the time of giving such notice; (ii) on the record date for the determination of stockholders
entitled to vote at the annual meeting; and (iii) at the time of the annual meeting.
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
109 |
Table of Contents
Forward-Looking Statements
This Proxy Statement contains “forward looking statements”
within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Such statements generally include the words “will,” “plans,” “intends,” “targets,”
“expects,” “outlook,” “guidance,” “believes,” “anticipates” or similar
expressions. Forward looking statements may include, without limitation, anticipated timing, results, charges and costs of any
current or future repositioning of our Performance Chemicals segment, including the announced review of strategic alternatives
for the Industrial Specialties product line and North Charleston, South Carolina crude tall oil refinery, the oleo-based product
refining transition, closure of our plants in Crossett, Arkansas and DeRidder, Louisiana; leadership transitions within our organization; the potential benefits of any acquisition
or investment transaction, expected financial positions, guidance, results of operations and cash flows; financing plans; business
strategies and expectations; operating plans; capital and other expenditures; competitive positions; growth opportunities for
existing products; benefits from new technology and cost reduction initiatives, plans and objectives; litigation-related strategies
and outcomes; and markets for securities. Actual results could differ materially from the views expressed. Factors that could
cause actual results to materially differ from those contained in the forward looking statements, or that could cause other forward
looking statements to prove incorrect, include, without limitation, charges, costs or actions, including adverse legal or regulatory
actions, resulting from, or in connection with, the current or future repositioning of our Performance Chemicals segment, including
the announced review of strategic alternatives for the Industrial Specialties product line and North Charleston, South Carolina
crude tall oil refinery, the oleo-based product refining transition, closure of our plants in Crossett, Arkansas and DeRidder,
Louisiana; losses due to resale of crude tall oil at less than we paid for it; leadership transitions within our organization; adverse effects from general global economic, geopolitical
and financial conditions beyond our control, including inflation and the Russia Ukraine war and conflict in the middle east; risks
related to our international sales and operations; adverse conditions in the automotive market; competition from substitute products,
new technologies and new or emerging competitors; worldwide air quality standards; a decrease in government infrastructure spending;
adverse conditions in cyclical end markets; the limited supply of or lack of access to sufficient raw materials, or any material
increase in the cost to acquire such raw materials; issues with or integration of future acquisitions and other investments; the
provision of services by third parties at several facilities; supply chain disruptions; natural disasters and extreme weather
events; or other unanticipated problems such as labor difficulties (including work stoppages), equipment failure or unscheduled
maintenance and repair; attracting and retaining key personnel; dependence on certain large customers; legal actions associated
with our intellectual property rights; protection of our intellectual property and other proprietary information; information
technology security breaches and other disruptions; complications with designing or implementing our new enterprise resource planning
system; government policies and regulations, including, but not limited to, those affecting the environment, climate change, tax
policies, tariffs and the chemicals industry; losses due to lawsuits arising out of environmental damage or personal injuries
associated with chemical or other manufacturing processes; and the other factors detailed from time to time in the reports we
file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including those described in Part I, Item 1A. Risk
Factors in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K as well as in our other filings with the SEC. These forward looking
statements speak only to management’s beliefs as of the date of this Proxy Statement. Ingevity assumes no obligation to
provide any revisions to, or update, any projections and forward looking statements contained in this Proxy Statement.
110 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Appendix A: Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Reconciliation Tables
Non-GAAP financial measures used in this proxy
statement
Ingevity has presented certain financial measures in this Proxy Statement,
defined below, which have not been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”)
These financial measures are not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the most directly comparable financial
measure calculated in accordance with GAAP.
Metrics used in “2024 Business Highlights,”
“Fiscal Year 2024 Compensation Highlights,” and “NEO Performance and Compensation Decisions”
Adjusted
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin |
|
Definitions.
“Adjusted EBITDA” is defined as net income (loss) plus interest expense,
net, provision (benefit) for income taxes, depreciation, amortization, restructuring
and other (income) charges, net, goodwill impairment charge, acquisition and other-related
(income) costs, litigation verdict charges, (gain) loss on strategic investments, loss
on CTO resales, CTO supply contract termination charges, and pension and postretirement
settlement and curtailment (income) charges, net. “Adjusted EBITDA Margin”
is defined as Adjusted EBITDA divided by Net sales.
Reason Used. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures
provide management as well as investors, potential investors, securities analysts and others with useful information to evaluate
the performance of the business, because such measures, when viewed together with our financial results computed in accordance
with GAAP, provide a more complete understanding of the factors and trends affecting our historical financial performance and
projected future results. We believe Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin are useful measures because they exclude the effects
of financing and investment activities as well as non-operating activities.
Reconciliation. The table below reconciles Adjusted EBITDA
to net income (loss), the most comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP.
|
Free Cash Flow |
|
Definition. “Free
Cash Flow” is defined as net cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures.
Reason Used. Management believes that free cash flow is
an important liquidity measure for the Company and that it is useful to investors and management as a measure of the ability of
our business to generate cash.
Reconciliation. The table below reconciles Free Cash Flow
to net cash provided by operating activities, the most comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP.
|
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
111 |
Table of Contents
Appendix A: Non-GAAP Financial
Measures and Reconciliation Tables
Metrics used in “Short-Term Incentive
Plan and 2024 Awards”
Metrics used in “Short-Term Incentive Plan
and 2024 Awards”
Company
STIP-Adjusted EBITDA |
|
Definition. “Company STIP-Adjusted EBITDA” is defined as Adjusted EBITDA (as
defined above), plus or minus the impact of certain non-cash gains or charges as determined
in the T&C Committee’s sole discretion. Excluded items may include the cumulative
effect of accounting changes, the effect of new accounting pronouncements, last-in, first-out
(LIFO) adjustment (income) expense, (gain) loss on currency translation and hyperinflation
(gain) loss, and certain other adjustments reflecting substantial or out of the ordinary
matters.
Reason Used. Company STIP-Adjusted EBITDA was selected
as a performance measure under the 2024 STIP because Adjusted EBITDA is the primary performance measurement of the Company’s
earnings guidance and drives behavior consistent with the stockholders’ interests. Additionally, for compensation award
purposes, eliminating the other certain non-cash gains or losses was appropriate because the impacts of both were primarily driven
by external market conditions and not by decisions management could directly influence.
Reconciliation. The table below reconciles Company STIP-Adjusted
EBITDA to net income (loss), the most comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP.
|
Business
Unit STIP-Adjusted EBITDA
(“BU STIP-Adjusted EBITDA”) |
|
Definition. “BU STIP-Adjusted EBITDA” is defined as Segment EBITDA, as defined
under ASC 280, plus or minus the impact of certain non-cash gains or charges as determined
in the T&C Committee’s sole discretion. Excluded items may include the cumulative
effect of accounting changes, the effect of new accounting pronouncements, last-in, first-out
(LIFO) adjustment (income) expense, (gain) loss on currency translation and hyperinflation
(gain) loss, and certain other adjustments reflecting substantial or out of the ordinary
matters
Reason Used. BU STIP-Adjusted EBITDA was selected as a
performance measure under the 2024 STIP because Segment EBITDA is the primary performance measurement of the Company’s segment
earnings and drives behavior consistent with the stockholders’ interests. Additionally, for segment compensation award purposes,
eliminating the fair market gain or loss from other certain non-cash gains or losses was appropriate because the impacts of both
were primarily driven by external market conditions and not by decisions management could directly influence.
Reconciliation. The table below reconciles Performance
Chemicals’ BU STIP-Adjusted EBITDA and Performance Materials’ BU STIP-Adjusted EBITDA to Segment EBITDA, respectively,
the most comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP under ASC 280.
|
Company
STIP-Adjusted Revenue |
|
Definition. Company STIP-Adjusted Revenue is defined as revenue in accordance with GAAP,
plus or minus the impact of certain non-recurring items including, without limitation,
currency impacts, discontinued or sold operations, acquisition impacts, and new accounting
pronouncements.
Reason Used. Company STIP-Adjusted Revenue was selected
as a performance measure under the 2024 STIP to drive behaviors consistent with our Ingevity 2.0 Strategy, which is to drive sustainable
revenue growth to achieve enduring enterprise success and create long-term stockholder value.
Reconciliation. The table below reconciles Company STIP-Adjusted
Revenue to the Company’s revenue, the most comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP.
|
Business
Unit STIP-Adjusted Revenue
(“BU STIP-Adjusted Revenue”) |
|
Definition. “BU STIP-Adjusted Revenue” is defined as segment revenue in accordance
with GAAP, plus or minus the impact of certain non-recurring items including, without
limitation, currency impacts, discontinued or sold operations, acquisition impacts, and
new accounting pronouncements.
Reason Used. BU STIP-Adjusted Revenue was selected as
a performance measure under the 2024 STIP to drive behaviors within each segment consistent with our Ingevity 2.0 Strategy, which
is to drive sustainable revenue growth to achieve enduring enterprise success and create long-term stockholder value.
Reconciliation. The table below reconciles BU STIP-Adjusted
Revenue to Performance Chemicals’, Performance Materials, and Advanced Polymer Technologies’ revenue, respectively, the most comparable
financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. |
112 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Appendix A: Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Reconciliation
Tables
Metrics used in “Fiscal Year 2024 Compensation Highlights,”
“Long-Term Incentive Plan and 2024 Awards,” and “Payout of 2022 PSU Award”
Metrics used in “Fiscal Year 2024 Compensation
Highlights,” “Long-Term Incentive Plan and 2024 Awards,” and “Payout of 2022 PSU Award”
LTIP Adjusted Earnings (Loss) per Share (“LTIP Adjusted EPS”) |
|
Definition. “LTIP Adjusted EPS” or “Adjusted EPS” is defined as continuing
operations diluted Earnings (Loss) per Share (EPS) attributable to Ingevity stockholders
plus restructuring and other (income) charges, net, per share, goodwill impairment charge
per share, acquisition and other-related (income) costs per share, pension and postretirement
settlement and curtailment (income) charges per share, loss on CTO resales per share,
CTO supply contract termination charges per share, (gain) loss on strategic investments
per share, debt refinancing fees per share, litigation verdict charge per share, and
the income tax expense (benefit) per share on those items, less the provision (benefit)
from certain discrete tax items per share, and certain non-cash (income) charges per
share (which includes: cumulative effect of accounting changes per share, the effect
of new accounting pronouncements per share, last-in, first-out (LIFO) adjustment (income)
expense per share, (gain) loss on currency translation and hyperinflation (gain) loss
per share, certain other adjustments reflecting substantial or out of the ordinary matters
(gain) loss per share, and the income tax expense (benefit) per share on these items.
Reason Used. LTIP Adjusted EPS was selected as a performance
measure because Adjusted EPS is a primary performance measurement of the Company’s profitability over the performance period.
Reconciliation. The table below reconciles LTIP Adjusted EPS
to diluted earnings per share, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP.
|
Cumulative
Earnings (Loss) per Share
(“Cumulative EPS”) |
|
Definition. “Cumulative EPS” is defined as the accumulation of LTIP Adjusted
EPS for each year within the performance period of the applicable PSU awards.
Reason Used. Cumulative EPS was selected as a performance
measure because Cumulative EPS is a primary performance measurement of the Company’s profitability over the performance
period.
Reconciliation. The table below reconciles Cumulative
EPS to diluted earnings per share, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP.
|
Adjusted Return on Invested Capital (“Adjusted ROIC”) |
|
Definition. “Adjusted ROIC” is defined as the Return on Invested Capital (“ROIC”)
for each year within the performance period of the applicable PSU award. ROIC is defined
as net operating profit after tax (NOPAT) divided by the average Invested Capital for
the period using an average ROIC from the plan year. NOPAT is defined as net income (loss)
from continuing operations plus interest expense (income), net, restructuring and other
(income) charges, acquisition and other-related (income) costs, loss on CTO resales,
CTO supply contract termination charges, (gain) loss on strategic investment, debt refinancing
fees, litigation verdict charges, pension settlement and curtailment (gain) loss, certain
non-cash (income) charges, and the income tax expense (benefit) on these items, including
the tax expense (benefit) recorded as a result of legislative tax rate changes, and certain
discrete tax items such as excess tax benefits on share-based compensation vestings.
Invested Capital is defined as total debt including financing lease obligations (including
the amounts recorded as the result of adoption of new accounting standards), less the
financing lease restricted investment plus total Ingevity stockholders’ equity.
Average Invested Capital for each year will be defined as a two (2) point average: (beginning
calendar year Invested Capital plus end of calendar year Invested Capital) divided by
two.
Reason Used. The T&C Committee believes that, in the
context of our ongoing PC segment repositioning efforts, a one-year forecast to support performance goals for the 2024 PSUs is
an appropriate way to balance the dynamic environment with accountability for capital discipline to align with stockholder interests.
Reconciliation. The table below calculates the Adjusted
ROIC for the 2024 PSUs and reconciles NOPAT (Adjusted ROIC numerator) to net income attributable to Ingevity’s stockholders,
the most comparable measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, and calculates Invested Capital (Adjusted ROIC denominator) using
the balance sheet.
|
Average
Return on Invested Capital
(“Average ROIC”) |
|
Definitions. “Average ROIC” is defined as the average of the Adjusted ROIC for
each of the three years within the performance period of the applicable PSU award.
Reason Used. Average ROIC was selected as a performance measure because it aligns with
shareholder interests and promotes capital discipline. The T&C Committee believes
that the use of an average calculation drives management accountability consistently
throughout the performance period.
Reconciliation. The table below calculates the Average
ROIC for the 2022 PSUs and reconciles NOPAT (Average ROIC numerator) to net income attributable to Ingevity’s stockholders,
the most comparable measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, and calculates Average Invested Capital (Average ROIC denominator)
using the balance sheet. |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
113 |
Table of Contents
Appendix A: Non-GAAP Financial
Measures and Reconciliation Tables
Metrics used in “Fiscal Year 2024 Compensation
Highlights,” “Long-Term Incentive Plan and 2024 Awards,” and “Payout of 2022 PSU Award”
AFA
EBITDA and AFA EBITDA Margin |
|
Definitions. “AFA EBITDA” is defined as net income (loss) plus interest expense, net, provision
(benefit) for income taxes, depreciation, amortization, restructuring and other (income)
charges, net, including inventory lower of cost or market charges associated with restructuring
actions, acquisition and other-related (income) costs, litigation verdict charges, gain on
sale of strategic investment, loss on CTO resales, and pension and postretirement settlement
and curtailment (income) charges, net for alternative fatty acid (“AFA”) products
sold from the Company’s plants in North Charleston, South Carolina and Crossett, Arkansas
(together, the “Performance Plants”). “AFA EBITDA Margin” is defined
as AFA EBITDA divided by net sales of AFA products from the Performance Plants.
Reason Used. AFA EBITDA Margin was selected
as a performance measure for the PC Transformation Award PSUs because it is a good indicator of whether the Company’s efforts to
accelerate the transition of our PC segment to a broader based oleochemical product line is being accomplished on a profitable basis.
We believe these non-GAAP financial measures provide management as well as investors, potential investors, securities analysts
and others with useful information to evaluate the performance of the strategic transformation of our PC segment to diversify our feedstocks
from CTO-based products to oleochemical products, because such measures, when viewed together with our financial results computed in
accordance with GAAP, provide a more complete understanding of the factors and trends affecting our historical financial performance
and projected future results. We believe AFA EBITDA and AFA EBITDA Margin are useful measures because they exclude the effects of financing
and investment activities as well as non-operating activities.
Reconciliation. When performance under the
PC Transformation Award PSUs is certified, the Company will provide a table that reconciles AFA EBITDA to net income (loss), the most
comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. |
114 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Appendix A: Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Reconciliation
Tables
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) (GAAP) to Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP)
to Company STIP-Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP)
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) (GAAP) to
Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP) to Company STIP-Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP)
In
millions, unaudited | |
Year
Ending 2024 | | |
Year
Ending 2023 | | |
Year
Ending 2022 |
Net
income (loss) (GAAP) | |
| (430.3) | | |
$ | (5.4) | | |
$ | 211.6 |
Interest
expense | |
| 97.8 | | |
| 93.3 | | |
| 61.8 |
Interest
income | |
| (7.7) | | |
| (6.3) | | |
| (7.5) |
Provision
(benefit) for income taxes | |
| (105.3) | | |
| (4.7) | | |
| 58.0 |
Depreciation
and amortization | |
| 108.3 | | |
| 122.8 | | |
| 108.8 |
Restructuring
and other (income) charges, net | |
| 186.2 | | |
| 170.2 | | |
| 13.8 |
Acquisition
and other-related (income) costs | |
| 0.3 | | |
| 4.5 | | |
| 5.9 |
(Gain)
loss on sale of strategic investment | |
| 11.4 | | |
| (19.3) | | |
| — |
Loss
on CTO resales | |
| 52.7 | | |
| 22.0 | | |
| — |
Goodwill
Impairment | |
| 349.1 | | |
| — | | |
| — |
CTO
supply contract termination fee | |
| 100.0 | | |
| — | | |
| — |
Pension
and postretirement settlement and curtailment charges (income), net | |
| 0.2 | | |
| — | | |
| 0.2 |
Adjusted
EBITDA (Non-GAAP)(1) | |
$ | 362.7 | | |
$ | 377.1 | | |
| 452.6 |
Certain (income) charges(2) | |
| 9.8 | | |
| 21.2 | | |
| (1.7) |
Company
STIP-Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP) | |
$ | 372.5 | | |
$ | 398.3 | | |
$ | 450.9 |
Net Sales | |
$ | 1,406.4 | | |
$ | 1,692.1 | | |
| 1,668.3 |
Adjusted
EBITDA Margin (Non-GAAP) | |
| 25.8% | | |
| 22.3% | | |
| 27.1% |
(1) |
For more information
on the adjustments from Net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA, refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
with the SEC on February 19, 2025, Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations. |
(2) |
Represents certain (income) charges primarily
including inventory adjustments recorded during the period in accordance with last-in, first-out
(“LIFO”) inventory accounting, inventory adjustments recorded during the period related to exiting certain markets, associated with our Performance Chemicals repositioning actions, CEO severance charges and non-cash translation impacts associated with currency exchange rate fluctuations. |
Reconciliation of Net Cash Provided
by Operating Activities (GAAP) to Free Cash Flow (Non-GAAP)
In
millions, unaudited | |
Year
Ending 2024 | | |
Year
Ending 2023 |
Net
Cash Provided by Operating Activities (GAAP) | |
$ | 128.6 | | |
$ | 205.1 |
Capital
expenditures | |
| (77.6) | | |
| (109.8) |
Free
Cash Flow (Non-GAAP) | |
$ | 51.0 | | |
$ | 95.3 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
115 |
Table of Contents
Appendix A: Non-GAAP Financial
Measures and Reconciliation Tables
Reconciliation of Segment EBITDA (GAAP) to
BU STIP-Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP)
Reconciliation of Segment EBITDA
(GAAP) to BU STIP-Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP)
| |
Year
Ending 2024 |
In
millions, unaudited | |
Performance
Chemicals | | |
Performance
Materials | | |
Advanced
Polymer Technologies |
Segment
EBITDA (GAAP) | |
$ | 14.7 | | |
$ | 319.1 | | |
$ | 35.2 |
Certain (income) charges(1) | |
| (1.9) | | |
| 1.5 | | |
| 3.9 |
BU
STIP-Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP) | |
$ | 12.8 | | |
$ | 320.6 | | |
$ | 39.1 |
(1) |
Represents
certain (income) charges primarily including non-cash income resulting from inventory adjustments recorded during the period in
accordance with last-in,
first-out (“LIFO”) inventory accounting, translation impacts associated with foreign currency exchange rate
fluctuations, and CEO severance charges. |
Reconciliation of Revenue (GAAP)
to Company STIP-Adjusted Revenue (Non-GAAP)
In millions, unaudited | Year
Ending 2024 |
Revenue | |
$ | 1,406.4 |
Certain non-recurring items(1) | |
| (33.0) |
Company STIP-Adjusted Revenue (Non-GAAP) | |
$ | 1,373.4 |
(1) |
Represents certain
non-cash income (cost) translation impacts associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and sales related to
exited markets due to the repositioning of the Performance Chemicals’ segment. |
Reconciliation of Segment Revenue
(GAAP) to BU STIP-Adjusted Revenue (Non-GAAP)
| |
Year Ending 2024 |
In millions, unaudited | |
Performance Chemicals | | |
Performance Materials | | |
Advanced Polymer Technologies |
Segment Revenue (GAAP) | |
$ | 608.2 | | |
$ | 609.6 | | |
| 188.6 |
Certain non-recurring items(1) | |
| (41.3) | | |
| 5.0 | | |
| 3.3 |
BU STIP-Adjusted Revenue (Non-GAAP) | |
$ | 566.9 | | |
$ | 614.6 | | |
| 191.9 |
(1) |
Represents certain
non-cash income (cost) translation impacts associated with currency exchange rate fluctuations and sales related to exited
markets due to the repositioning of the Performance Chemicals’ segment. |
116 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Appendix A: Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Reconciliation
Tables
Reconciliation of Diluted EPS (GAAP) to Cumulative EPS (Non-GAAP)
Reconciliation of Diluted EPS (GAAP) to Cumulative
EPS (Non-GAAP)
Shares
In millions, unaudited | |
Year
Ending 2024 | | |
Year
Ending 2023 | | |
Year
Ending 2022 |
Diluted
earnings (loss) per common share (GAAP) | |
$ | (11.85) | | |
$ | (0.15) | | |
| 5.50 |
Restructuring
and other (income) charges, net | |
| 5.12 | | |
| 4.64 | | |
| 0.36 |
Acquisition
and other-related (income) costs | |
| 0.01 | | |
| 0.12 | | |
| 0.14 |
Goodwill
Impairment charge | |
| 9.62 | | |
| — | | |
| — |
Debt
refinancing fees | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 0.13 |
Pension
and postretirement settlement and curtailment charges (income) | |
| 0.01 | | |
| — | | |
| 0.01 |
(Gain)
loss on sale of strategic investments | |
| 0.31 | | |
| (0.52) | | |
| — |
Loss
on CTO resales | |
| 1.45 | | |
| 0.60 | | |
| — |
CTO
supply contract termination fee | |
| 2.75 | | |
| — | | |
| — |
Tax
effect on items above | |
| (3.89) | | |
| (1.14) | | |
| (0.15) |
Tax
benefit from legislative tax rate changes, including certain discrete tax items(1) | |
| 0.02 | | |
| (0.02) | | |
| 0.02 |
Diluted
adjusted earnings (loss) per share (Non-GAAP) | |
$ | 3.51 | | |
$ | 3.53 | | |
$ | 6.01 |
Adjustments: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Certain (income) charges(2) | |
| 0.34 | | |
| 0.57 | | |
| (0.17) |
Tax
effect on items above | |
| (0.07) | | |
| (0.13) | | |
| 0.04 |
LTIP
Adjusted EPS (Non-GAAP) | |
$ | 3.78 | | |
$ | 3.97 | | |
$ | 5.88 |
Cumulative
EPS (Non-GAAP)(3) | |
| | | |
$ | 13.63 | | |
| |
(1) |
Represents certain
discrete tax items such as excess tax benefits on stock compensation and impacts of legislative tax rate changes.
Management believes excluding these discrete tax items assists investors, potential investors, securities analysts, and others
in understanding the tax provision and the effective tax rate related to continuing operating results thereby providing useful
supplemental information about operational performance. |
(2) |
Represents the sum of the following adjustments: inventory adjustments recorded during the period in accordance with last-in, first-out
(“LIFO”) inventory accounting, inventory adjustments recorded during the period related to exiting certain markets,
and non-cash translation impacts associated with currency exchange rate fluctuation. |
(3) |
Sum of 2022, 2023, and 2024. |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
117 |
Table of Contents
Appendix A: Non-GAAP Financial
Measures and Reconciliation Tables
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) (GAAP)
to NOPAT (Non-GAAP)
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) (GAAP) to
NOPAT (Non-GAAP)
In millions, unaudited | |
Year
Ending 2024 | | |
Year Ending 2023 | | |
Year Ending 2022 |
Net income (loss) (GAAP) | |
$ | (430.3) | | |
$ | (5.4) | | |
$ | 211.6 |
Restructuring and other (income) charges, net | |
| 186.2 | | |
| 170.2 | | |
| 13.8 |
Acquisition and other-related (income) costs | |
| 0.3 | | |
| 4.5 | | |
| 5.9 |
Debt refinancing fees | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 5.1 |
Pension and postretirement settlement and curtailment charges (income) | |
| 0.2 | | |
| — | | |
| 0.2 |
Goodwill impairment charge | |
| 349.1 | | |
| — | | |
| — |
(Gain) loss on sale of strategic investment | |
| 11.4 | | |
| (19.3) | | |
| — |
Loss on CTO resales | |
| 52.7 | | |
| 22.0 | | |
| — |
CTO supply contract termination charges | |
| 100.0 | | |
| | | |
| |
Tax effect on items above | |
| (140.4) | | |
| (41.8) | | |
| (5.9) |
Tax benefit from legislative tax rate changes, including certain discrete tax items(1) | |
| (0.9) | | |
| (0.6) | | |
| 0.7 |
Adjusted earnings (loss) (Non-GAAP) | |
$ | 128.3 | | |
$ | 129.6 | | |
$ | 231.4 |
Adjustments: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Interest expense, net | |
$ | 90.1 | | |
$ | 87.0 | | |
$ | 49.2 |
Certain miscellaneous (income)/charges(2) | |
| 9.8 | | |
| 21.2 | | |
| (6.6) |
Tax effect on items above | |
| (22.0) | | |
| (25.4) | | |
| (10.0) |
NOPAT (Non-GAAP) (Average ROIC numerator) | |
$ | 206.2 | | |
$ | 212.4 | | |
$ | 264.0 |
(1) |
Represents certain
discrete tax items such as excess tax benefits on stock compensation and impacts of legislative tax rate changes.
Management believes excluding these discrete tax items assists investors, potential investors, securities analysts, and others
in understanding the tax provision and the effective tax rate related to continuing operating results thereby providing useful
supplemental information about operational performance. |
(2) |
Represents the sum of the following adjustments: non-cash income resulting from inventory adjustments recorded during the period in accordance with last-in,
first-out (“LIFO”) inventory accounting, inventory adjustments recorded during the period related to exiting certain
markets, and non-cash translation impacts associated with currency exchange rate fluctuation. |
Calculation of Average Invested
Capital (Non-GAAP)
| |
December 31, |
In millions, unaudited | |
2024 | | |
2023 | | |
2022 | | |
2021 |
Total Ingevity Stockholders’ Equity | |
$ | 195.2 | | |
$ | 631.4 | | |
$ | 698.3 | | |
$ | 673.8 |
Total Debt including capital lease obligation | |
| 1,405.2 | | |
| 1,472.5 | | |
| 1,479.9 | | |
| 1,280.5 |
Less: Restricted Investment, gross of allowance for expected credit losses | |
| (81.8) | | |
| (79.3) | | |
| (78.6) | | |
| (76.6) |
Less: Cash and cash equivalents | |
| (68.0) | | |
| (95.9) | | |
| (76.7) | | |
| (275.4) |
Less: Restricted Cash | |
| (0.4) | | |
| (0.6) | | |
| (0.6) | | |
| (0.6) |
Invested Capital (Non-GAAP) | |
$ | 1,450.2 | | |
$ | 1,928.1 | | |
$ | 2,022.3 | | |
$ | 1,601.7 |
Average Invested Capital (Non-GAAP) (Average ROIC denominator) | |
| $ | | 1,689.2 | $ | | 1,975.2 | $ | | 1,812.0 | |
118 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Appendix A: Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Reconciliation
Tables
Calculation of Average ROIC (Non-GAAP)
Calculation of Average ROIC (Non-GAAP)
In millions, unaudited | |
2024 | | |
2023 | | |
2022 |
NOPAT (Non-GAAP) (Average ROIC numerator) | |
$ | 206.2 | | |
$ | 212.4 | | |
$ | 264.0 |
Average Invested Capital (Non-GAAP) (Average ROIC denominator) | |
| 1,689.2 | | |
| 1,975.2 | | |
| 1,812.0 |
Period-End ROIC (Non-GAAP) | |
| 12.2% | | |
| 10.8% | | |
| 14.6% |
Average ROIC (Non-GAAP) | |
| | | |
| 12.5% | | |
| |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
119 |
Table of Contents
Appendix B: Ingevity Corporation 2025
Omnibus Incentive Plan
INGEVITY CORPORATION
2025 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN
Effective [•], 2025
Section 1
Purpose and Objectives
The primary purpose of the Ingevity Corporation 2025
Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is to reward selected corporate officers, key employees and non-employee directors
of the Company and its Subsidiaries by enabling them to acquire shares of common stock of the Company and/or through the provision
of long term and short term cash payments The Plan is designed to attract and retain employees and non-employee directors of the
Company and its Subsidiaries and to encourage a sense of proprietorship in the Company and its Subsidiaries. Upon the Effective
Date, no further awards shall be granted under the Ingevity Corporation Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the
“Prior Plan”), and all awards outstanding under the Prior Plan as of the Effective Date shall remain subject to the
terms and conditions of the Prior Plan.
Section 2
Definitions
As used herein, the terms set forth below shall have
the following respective meanings:
(a) |
“Authorized Officer” means the Chair of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer of
the Company or the Chief Human Resources Officer of the Company (or any other senior officers of the Company to whom any of
such individuals shall delegate the authority to execute any Award Agreement). |
|
|
(b) |
“Applicable Pro-Ration Factor” has the meaning set forth in Section 14.2(b). |
|
|
(c) |
“Award” means the grant of any Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Stock Award, or Cash Award, any of
which may be structured as a Performance Award, whether granted singly, or in combination with another Award, to a Participant
pursuant to such applicable terms, conditions, and limitations as the Committee may establish in accordance with the objectives
of this Plan. |
|
|
(d) |
“Award Agreement” means the document (in written or electronic form) communicating the terms, conditions
and limitations applicable to an Award. The Committee may, in its discretion, require that the Participant execute such Award
Agreement, or may provide for procedures through which Award Agreements are made available to a Participant but are not executed.
Any Participant who is granted an Award and who does not affirmatively reject the applicable Award Agreement shall be deemed
to have accepted the terms of Award as embodied in the Award Agreement. |
|
|
(e) |
“Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company. |
|
|
(f) |
“Business Combination” has the meaning set forth in Section 14.4(c). |
|
|
(g) |
“Cash Award”
means an Award denominated in cash. |
|
|
(h) |
“Cause” means, unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, (i) “Cause” (or its equivalent)
as defined in any individual employment agreement to which the applicable Participant and the Company or a Subsidiary are
parties, or (ii) if there is no such individual agreement or if it does not define Cause: (A) the willful or gross neglect
by a Participant of his employment duties; (B) the plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, or conviction for, the commission
of a felony offense or a misdemeanor offense involving moral turpitude by a Participant; (C) a material breach by a Participant
of a fiduciary duty owed to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries; (D) a material breach by a Participant of any nondisclosure,
non-solicitation or non-competition obligation owed to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries; or (E) a material violation
of any policies, rules or guidelines of the Company or a Subsidiary knowingly committed by a Participant. |
120 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Appendix B: Ingevity Corporation 2025
Omnibus Incentive Plan
(i) |
“Change in Control” has the meaning set forth in Section 14.5. |
|
|
(j) |
“Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time. |
|
|
(k) |
“Committee” means the Talent and Compensation Committee of the Board, and any successor committee thereto
or such other committee of the Board as may be designated by the Board to administer this Plan in whole or in part including
any subcommittee of the Board as designated by the Board. |
|
|
(l) |
“Common Stock” means the common stock of the Company. |
|
|
(m) |
“Company” means Ingevity Corporation or any successor thereto. |
|
|
(n) |
“Corporate Transaction” has the meaning set forth in Section
4.1(d)(i). |
|
|
(o) |
“Disability” means, unless otherwise defined in an individual agreement or Award Agreement, a disability
that entitles the Employee to benefits under the Company’s long-term disability plan, as may be in effect from time
to time, as determined by the plan administrator of the long-term disability plan, or if the Employee is not a participant
under the Company’s long-term disability plan, as determined if the Employee were a participant in a long-term disability
plan that covers similarly situated employees. |
|
|
(p) |
“Disaffiliation” means a Subsidiary ceasing to be a Subsidiary for any reason (including, without limitation,
as a result of a public offering, or a spinoff or sale by the Company, of the stock of the Subsidiary) or a sale of a division
of the Company. |
|
|
(q) |
“Dividend Equivalents” means, in the case of Restricted Stock Units or Performance Units, an amount
equal to all dividends and other distributions (or the economic equivalent thereof) that are payable to shareholders of record
during the Restriction Period or performance period, as applicable, on a like number of shares of Common Stock that are subject
to the Award. |
|
|
(r) |
“Effective Date” has the meaning set forth in Section 16(a). |
|
|
(s) |
“Employee” means an employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries. |
|
|
(t) |
“Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time. |
|
|
(u) |
“Exercise Price” means the price at which a Participant may exercise his right to receive cash or Common
Stock, as applicable, under the terms of an Award. |
|
|
(v) |
“Fair Market Value” of a share of Common Stock means, as of a particular date, (i) if shares of Common
Stock are listed on a national securities exchange, the closing sales price per share of Common Stock on the consolidated
transaction reporting system for the principal national securities exchange on which shares of Common Stock are listed on
that date, or, if there shall have been no such sale so reported on that date, on the last preceding date on which such a
sale was so reported, (ii) if the Common Stock is not so listed, the average of the closing bid and asked price on that date,
or, if there are no quotations available for such date, on the last preceding date on which such quotations shall be available,
as reported by an interdealer quotation system, (iii) if shares of Common Stock are not publicly traded, the most recent value
determined by an independent appraiser appointed by the Committee for such purpose as of a date within the preceding 12 months,
or (iv) if none of the above are applicable, the fair market value of a share of Common Stock as determined reasonably and
in good faith by the Committee. For purposes of establishing the fair market value of shares of Common Stock underlying
Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights, “Fair Market Value” shall be determined in a manner consistent with
securing exemption from, or avoiding adverse taxation under, Section 409A of the Code. |
|
|
(w) |
“Fiscal Year” means the calendar year of the Company. |
|
|
(x) |
“Good Reason” means (i) “Good Reason” as defined in any individual agreement or Award Agreement
to which the applicable Participant is a party, or (ii) if there is no such individual agreement or if it does not define
Good Reason (or its equivalent), any of the following without the Participant’s prior written consent: (A) a material
reduction in the Participant’s rate of annual base salary, (B) a relocation of the Participant’s principal place
of business more than 35 miles from the city in which such Participant’s principal place of business is located and
a further distance from the Participant’s principal residence or (C) a material and demonstrable adverse change in the
nature and scope of the Participant’s duties. In order to invoke a termination of employment for Good Reason, a Participant
shall provide written notice to the Company of the existence of one or more of the conditions described in clauses (A) through
(C) within 90 days following the Participant’s knowledge of the initial existence of such condition or conditions, and
the Company shall have 30 days following receipt of such written notice (the “Cure Period”) during which it may
remedy the |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
121 |
Table of Contents
Appendix B: Ingevity Corporation 2025
Omnibus Incentive Plan
|
condition. In the event that the Company fails to remedy the condition constituting Good Reason during
the Cure Period, the Participant must terminate employment, if at all, within 90 days following the Cure Period in order for
such termination of employment to constitute a termination of employment for Good Reason. |
|
|
(y) |
“Grant Date” means (i) the date on which the Committee by resolution selects an eligible individual
to receive a grant of an Award and determines the number of shares of Common Stock to be subject to such Award or the formula
for earning a number of shares or cash amount or (ii) such later date as the Committee shall provide in such resolution. |
|
|
(z) |
“Incumbent Board” has the meaning set forth in Section 14.4(b). |
|
|
(aa) |
“Incentive Stock Option” means an Option that is intended to comply with the requirements set forth
in Code Section 422. |
|
|
(bb) |
“Non-Employee Director” means anyone who serves on the Board, other than any employee of the Company. |
|
|
(cc) |
“Nonqualified Stock Option” means an Option that is not intended to comply with the requirements set
forth in Code Section 422. |
|
|
(dd) |
“Option” means a right to purchase a specified number of shares of Common Stock at a specified Exercise
Price, which may be either an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option. |
|
|
(ee) |
“Outstanding Common Stock” has the meaning set forth in Section 14.4(a). |
|
|
(ff) |
“Outstanding Voting Securities” has the meaning set forth in Section 14.4(a). |
|
|
(gg) |
“Participant” means an Employee or Non-Employee Director to whom an Award has been made under this
Plan. |
|
|
(hh) |
“Performance Award” means an Award made pursuant to this Plan to a Participant which is subject to
the attainment of one or more Performance Goals. A Performance Award may be in the form of Performance Unit Awards, Restricted
Stock Awards, Options, SARs or Cash Awards. |
|
|
(ii) |
“Performance Goal” means one or more standards established by the Committee to determine in whole or
in part whether a Performance Award shall be earned. |
|
|
(jj) |
“Performance Unit” means a unit evidencing the right to receive in specified circumstances cash or
shares of Common Stock or equivalent value of Common Stock in cash, the value of which at the time it is settled is determined
as a function of the extent to which established performance criteria have been satisfied. Performance Units may take the
form of performance-based Restricted Stock Units or Cash Awards. |
|
|
(kk) |
“Performance Unit Award” means an Award in the form of Performance Units. |
|
|
(ll) |
“Person” has the meaning set forth in Section 14.4(a). |
|
|
(mm) |
“Qualified Termination of Employment” means a termination of employment by the Company without Cause,
other than as a result of death or disability, or a termination of employment by a Participant for Good Reason. |
|
|
(nn) |
“Replaced Award” has the meaning set forth in Section 14.3. |
|
|
(oo) |
“Replacement Award” has the meaning set forth in Section 14.3. |
|
|
(pp) |
“Restricted Stock” means a share of Common Stock that is restricted or subject to forfeiture provisions. |
|
|
(qq) |
“Restricted Stock Award” means an Award in the form of Restricted Stock. |
|
|
(rr) |
“Restricted Stock Unit” means a unit evidencing the right to receive in specified circumstances one
share of Common Stock or equivalent value in cash that is restricted as to transfer and subject to forfeiture provisions. |
|
|
(ss) |
“Restricted Stock Unit Award” means an Award in the form of Restricted Stock Units. |
|
|
(tt) |
“Restriction Period” means a period of time beginning as of the date upon which an Award is made pursuant
to this Plan and ending as of the date upon which such Award is no longer restricted or subject to forfeiture provisions. |
|
|
(uu) |
“Share Change” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.1(d)(ii). |
|
|
(vv) |
“Stock Appreciation Right” or “SAR” means a right to receive a payment, in cash
or Common Stock, equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value of a specified number of shares of Common Stock on the date
the right is exercised over a specified Exercise Price. |
122 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Appendix B:
Ingevity Corporation 2025 Omnibus Incentive Plan
(ww) |
“Stock Award” means an Award in the form of shares of Common Stock, including a
Restricted Stock Award, and a Restricted Stock Unit Award or Performance Unit Award that may be settled in shares of Common
Stock, and excluding Options and SARs. |
|
|
(xx) |
“Subsidiary” means any corporation, partnership, association, joint stock company, business trust,
unincorporated organization or other entity that the Company controls directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries.
For purposes of Incentive Stock Options, “Subsidiary” means a “subsidiary corporation” within
the meaning of Section 424(f) of the Code. |
Section 3
Eligibility
All Employees and Non-Employee
Directors are eligible for Awards under this Plan. The Committee shall determine the type or types of Awards to be made under
this Plan and shall designate from time to time the Employees and Non-Employee Directors who are to be granted Awards under this
Plan.
Section 4
Shares Subject to Awards
and other Plan Limits
4.1 Common Stock Available for Awards.
(a) Plan
Maximums. The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be delivered pursuant to Awards under the Plan shall not exceed:
(i) 425,000 shares of Common Stock, plus (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock that remain available for issuance under
the Prior Plan from and after the Effective Date, plus (iii) the number of shares of Common Stock underlying any equity awards
previously granted under the Prior Plan as of the Effective Date that, on or after the Effective Date, are forfeited, terminated,
expire or lapse without being exercised, or any such awards that are settled for cash. Shares of Common Stock subject to
an Award under the Plan may be authorized and unissued shares or may be treasury shares.
(b) Individual
Limits. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, the sum of (A) the aggregate grant date fair
value (computed as of the date of grant in accordance with applicable financial accounting rules) of all Awards granted, plus
(B) the total amount payable in cash, for any fiscal year to any Participant who is a Non-Employee Director in that year shall
not exceed $750,000.
(c) Rules
for Calculating Shares Delivered.
(i) To the extent that any Award
is forfeited, terminates, expires or lapses without being exercised, or any Award is settled for cash, the shares of Common Stock
subject to such Award not delivered as a result thereof shall again be available for Awards under the Plan.
(ii) Shares of Common Stock that
are tendered by a Participant or withheld as full or partial payment to satisfy withholding taxes shall not become available again
for issuance under this Plan.
(iii) Shares of Common Stock that
are tendered by a Participant or withheld as full or partial payment for the Exercise Price of an Award shall not become available
again for issuance under this Plan.
(d) Adjustment
Provisions.
(i) In the event of a merger, consolidation,
acquisition of property or shares, stock rights offering, liquidation, disposition for consideration of the Company’s direct
or indirect ownership of a Subsidiary (including by reason of a Disaffiliation), or similar event affecting the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries (each, a “Corporate Transaction”), the Committee or the Board may in its discretion make such
substitutions or adjustments as it deems appropriate and equitable to (A) the aggregate number and kind of shares or other securities
reserved for issuance and delivery under the Plan, (B) the various maximum limitations set forth in Sections 4.1(a) and 4.1(b)
upon certain types of Awards and upon the grants to individuals of certain types of Awards, (C) the number and kind of shares
or other securities subject to outstanding Awards; and (D) the exercise price of outstanding Options and Stock Appreciation Rights.
(ii) In the event of a stock dividend,
stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, share combination, or recapitalization or similar event affecting the capital
structure of the Company or a Disaffiliation, separation or spinoff, in each case without consideration, or other extraordinary
dividend of cash or other property (each, a “Share Change”), the Committee or the Board shall make such substitutions
or adjustments as it deems appropriate and equitable to (A) the aggregate number and kind of shares or other securities reserved
for issuance and delivery under the Plan, (B) the various maximum limitations set forth in Sections 4.1(a) and 4.1(b) upon certain
types of Awards and upon the grants to
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
123 |
Table of Contents
Appendix B: Ingevity Corporation 2025
Omnibus Incentive Plan
individuals of certain types of Awards, (C) the number
and kind of shares or other securities subject to outstanding Awards; and (D) the exercise price of outstanding Options and Stock
Appreciation Rights.
(iii) In the case of Corporate
Transactions, the adjustments contemplated by clause (i) of this paragraph (d) may include, without limitation, (A) the cancellation
of outstanding Awards in exchange for payments of cash, property or a combination thereof having an aggregate value equal to the
value of such Awards, as determined by the Committee or the Board in its sole discretion (it being understood that in the case
of a Corporate Transaction with respect to which holders of Common Stock receive consideration other than publicly traded equity
securities of the ultimate surviving entity, any such determination by the Committee that the value of an Option or Stock Appreciation
Right shall for this purpose be deemed to equal the excess, if any, of the value of the consideration being paid for each share
of Common Stock pursuant to such Corporate Transaction over the exercise price of such Option or Stock Appreciation Right shall
conclusively be deemed valid), (B) the substitution of other property (including, without limitation, cash or other securities
of the Company and securities of entities other than the Company) for the shares of Common Stock subject to outstanding Awards,
and (C) in connection with any Disaffiliation, arranging for the assumption of Awards, or replacement of Awards with new awards
based on other property or other securities (including, without limitation, other securities of the Company and securities of
entities other than the Company), by the affected Subsidiary or division or by the entity that controls such Subsidiary, or division
following such Disaffiliation (as well as any corresponding adjustments to Awards that remain based upon Company securities).
Any adjustments made pursuant to this Section 4.1(d) to Awards that are considered “deferred compensation” within
the meaning of Section 409A of the Code shall be made in compliance with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. Any adjustments
made pursuant to this Section 4.1(d) to Awards that are not considered “deferred compensation” subject to Section
409A of the Code shall be made in such a manner as to ensure that after such adjustment, the Awards either (A) continue not to
be subject to Section 409A of the Code or (B) comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.
(iv) Any adjustments made pursuant
to this Section 4.1(d) need not be the same for all Participants.
Section 5
Administration
5.1 Authority
of the Committee; Qualifications. Except as otherwise provided in this Plan with respect to actions or determinations
by the Board, this Plan shall be administered by the Committee, subject to the following:
(a) The members of the Committee
shall satisfy any independence requirements prescribed by any stock exchange on which the Company lists its Common Stock; and
(b) Awards may be granted to individuals
who are subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act only if the Committee is comprised solely of two or more “Non-Employee
Directors” as defined in Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 16b-3 (as amended from time to time, and any successor
rule, regulation or statute fulfilling the same or similar function).
5.2 Powers. Subject
to the provisions hereof, the Committee shall have full and exclusive power and authority to administer this Plan and to take
all actions that are specifically contemplated hereby or are necessary or appropriate in connection with the administration hereof.
The Committee shall also have full and exclusive power to interpret this Plan and to adopt such rules, regulations and guidelines
for carrying out this Plan as it may deem necessary or proper. Subject to Sections 5.4, 6.2 and 6.3 hereof, the Committee may,
in its discretion:
(a) select the eligible individuals
to whom Awards may from time to time be granted;
(b) determine whether and to what
extent different forms of Awards are to be granted hereunder;
(c) determine the number of shares
of Common Stock to be covered by each Award granted hereunder or the amount of any cash-based award;
(d) determine the terms and conditions
of each Award granted hereunder, based on such factors as the Committee shall determine;
(e) subject to Section 16, modify,
amend or adjust the terms and conditions of any Award, at any time or from time to time;
(f) adopt, alter and repeal such
administrative rules, guidelines and practices governing the Plan as it shall from time to time deem advisable;
124 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Appendix B: Ingevity Corporation 2025
Omnibus Incentive Plan
(g) accelerate the vesting or
lapse of restrictions of any outstanding Award, based in each case on such considerations as the Committee in its sole discretion
determines;
(h) interpret the terms and provisions
of the Plan and any Award issued under the Plan (and any agreement relating thereto);
(i) establish any “blackout”
period that the Committee in its sole discretion deems necessary or advisable, which “blackout” period may be in addition
to any trading “blackout” periods established by the Company;
(j) decide all other matters that
must be determined in connection with an Award; and
(k) otherwise administer the Plan.
5.3 Final and Binding.
The Committee may correct any defect or supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in this Plan or in any Award Agreement
in the manner and to the extent the Committee deems necessary or desirable to further this Plan’s purposes. Any decision
of the Committee in the interpretation and administration of this Plan shall lie within its sole and absolute discretion and shall
be final, conclusive and binding on all parties concerned.
5.4 Prohibition on Repricing
of Awards. In no event may any Option or Stock Appreciation Right granted under this Plan be amended, other than pursuant
to Section 4.1, to decrease the exercise price thereof, be cancelled in exchange for cash or other Awards or in conjunction with
the grant of any new Option or Stock Appreciation Right with a lower exercise price or otherwise be subject to any action that
would be treated under the applicable listing standards or for accounting purposes, as a “repricing” of such Option
or Stock Appreciation Right, unless such amendment, cancellation, or action is approved by the Company’s stockholders.
5.5 Delegation of Authority.
Subject to Delaware law, the Committee may delegate any of its authority to the Board, to any other committee of the Board
or to an Authorized Officer to grant Awards to Employees who are not subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act; provided that
the requirements of Section 5.1 are met. Such delegation shall be made in writing specifically setting forth such delegated authority.
As permitted by Delaware law, the Committee may also delegate to an Authorized Officer authority to execute on behalf of the Company
any Award Agreement. The Committee and the Board, as applicable, may engage or authorize the engagement of a third party administrator
to carry out administrative functions under this Plan.
Section 6
Awards
6.1 Grants. Awards
may be granted under the Plan to eligible individuals.
6.2 Award Agreements.
Each Award shall be embodied in an Award Agreement, which shall contain such terms, conditions and limitations as shall be
determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion, and, if required by the Committee, shall be signed by the Participant to
whom the Award is granted and by an Authorized Officer for and on behalf of the Company. Awards may consist of those listed in
Sections 7-13 and may be granted singly, or in combination with another Award. Awards may also be made in combination with, in
replacement of, or as alternatives to, grants or rights under this Plan or any other plan of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries,
including the plan of any acquired entity. Upon the termination of employment by a Participant who is an Employee, any unexercised,
unvested or unpaid Awards shall be treated as set forth in the applicable Award Agreement.
6.3 Minimum Vesting Requirements.
No Award granted under this Plan may vest before the first anniversary of the date of grant, subject to certain accelerated
vesting contemplated under this Plan, with the exception of (i) Awards covering up to five percent (5%) of the number of shares
of Common Stock reserved for issuance under this Plan, (ii) annual Awards to Non-Employee Directors that occur in connection with
the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders may vest on the earlier of the one-year anniversary of the date of grant or
the date of the Company’s next annual meeting of stockholders which is at least 50 weeks after the immediately preceding
year’s annual meeting, (iii) Awards granted in replacement of Awards previously granted under this Plan or another long-term
incentive plan of the Company, (iv) Awards granted in connection with the assumption or substitution of awards as part of a corporate
transaction, (v) the occurrence of a Change in Control, and (vi) Awards that may be settled only in cash. Nothing in this
Section 6.3 shall limit the Committee’s authority to provide for the accelerated vesting of Awards as permitted under Section
5.2(g) and Section 14 of this Plan.
6.4 Payment of Awards.
Payment of Awards may be made in the form of cash or Common Stock, or a combination thereof, and may include such restrictions
as the Committee shall determine, including, but not limited to, in the case of Common Stock, restrictions on transfer and forfeiture
provisions. For a Restricted Stock Award, the certificates
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
125 |
Table of Contents
Appendix B: Ingevity Corporation 2025
Omnibus Incentive Plan
evidencing the shares of such Restricted Stock (to
the extent that such shares are so evidenced) shall contain appropriate legends and restrictions that describe the terms and conditions
of the restrictions applicable thereto. For a Restricted Stock Unit Award that may be settled in shares of Common Stock, the shares
of Common Stock that may be issued at the end of the Restriction Period shall be evidenced by book entry registration or in such
other manner as the Committee may determine.
6.5 Dividends and Dividend
Equivalents. Rights to dividends may be extended to and made part of any Restricted Stock Award, and Dividend Equivalents
may, in the Committee’s discretion, be extended to and made part of any Restricted Stock Unit Award and Performance Unit
Award, subject in each case to such terms, conditions and restrictions as the Committee may establish; provided, however, that
no such dividends or Dividend Equivalents shall be paid with respect to unvested Stock Awards, including Stock Awards subject
to Performance Goals. Dividends and/ or Dividend Equivalents shall not be extended to any Options or SARs. Dividends and
Dividend Equivalents shall be subject to the same vesting, restriction, forfeiture and payment conditions as the underlying Awards.
Section 7
Options
7.1 General. An
Award may be in the form of an Option. An Option awarded pursuant to this Plan may consist of either an Incentive Stock Option
or a Nonqualified Stock Option. The price at which shares of Common Stock may be purchased upon the exercise of an Option shall
be not less than the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the Grant Date. The term of an Option shall not exceed 10 years
from the Grant Date. Subject to the foregoing provisions, the terms, conditions and limitations applicable to any Option, including,
but not limited to, the term of any Option and the date or dates upon which the Option becomes vested and exercisable, shall be
determined by the Committee and subject to the applicable requirements described in Section 6 hereof.
7.2 Option Exercise.
The Exercise Price shall be paid in full at the time of exercise in cash or, if permitted by the Committee and elected by
the Participant, the Participant may pay the exercise price by means of the Company withholding shares of Common Stock otherwise
deliverable on exercise of the Award or tendering Common Stock valued at Fair Market Value on the date of exercise, or any combination
thereof. The Committee, in its sole discretion, shall determine acceptable methods for Participants to tender Common Stock, including
imposing a requirement that such Common Stock shall have been held by the Participants for a prescribed period before being tendered.
The Committee may provide for procedures to permit the exercise or purchase of such Awards by use of the proceeds to be received
from the sale of Common Stock issuable pursuant to an Award (including cashless exercise procedures approved by the Committee
involving a broker or dealer approved by the Committee). The Committee may adopt additional rules and procedures regarding the
exercise of Options from time to time, including additional means for paying Exercise Prices, provided that such rules and procedures
are not inconsistent with the provisions of this Section.
Section 8
Stock Appreciation Rights
An Award may be in the form of
an SAR. The Exercise Price for an SAR, or the applicable baseline from which gain is measured upon exercise, shall not be less
than the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the Grant Date. The exercise period for an SAR shall extend no more than 10
years after the Grant Date. Subject to the foregoing provisions, the terms, conditions, and limitations applicable to any SAR,
including, but not limited to, the term of any SAR and the date or dates upon which the SAR becomes vested and exercisable, shall
be determined by the Committee; provided, however, that a SAR that may be settled all or in part in shares of Common Stock shall
be subject to the applicable requirements described in Section 6 hereof.
Section 9
Restricted Stock Awards
An Award may be in the form of
a Restricted Stock Award. The terms, conditions and limitations applicable to any Restricted Stock Award, including, but not limited
to, vesting or other restrictions, shall be determined by the Committee and subject to the applicable requirements described in
Section 6 hereof.
Section 10
Restricted Stock Unit Awards
An Award may be in the form of
a Restricted Stock Unit Award. The terms, conditions and limitations applicable to a Restricted Stock Unit Award, including, but
not limited to, the Restriction Period and the right to Dividend Equivalents, if any, shall be determined by the Committee. Subject
to the terms of this Plan, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may settle Restricted Stock Units in the form of cash or in
shares of Common Stock (or in a combination thereof) equal to the
126 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Appendix B: Ingevity Corporation 2025
Omnibus Incentive Plan
value of the vested Restricted Stock Units; provided,
however, that a Restricted Stock Unit Award that may be settled all or in part in shares of Common Stock shall be subject to the
applicable requirements described in Section 6 hereof.
Section 11
Performance Unit Awards
An Award may be in the form of
a Performance Unit Award. Each Performance Unit shall have an initial value that is established by the Committee on the Grant
Date. Subject to the terms of this Plan, after the applicable performance period has ended, the Participant shall be entitled
to receive settlement of the value of the number of Performance Units earned by the Participant over the performance period, to
be determined as a function of the extent to which the corresponding performance goals have been achieved. The timing and the
terms of settlement of earned Performance Units shall be as determined by the Committee and as evidenced in an Award Agreement.
Subject to the terms of this Plan, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may settle earned Performance Units in the form of cash
or in shares of Common Stock (or in a combination thereof) equal to the value of the earned Performance Units; provided, however,
that a Performance Unit Award that may be settled all or in part in shares of Common Stock shall be subject to the applicable
requirements described in Section 6 hereof.
Section 12
Other Stock Based Awards
and Cash Awards
12.1 Other Stock Based Awards.
Other Awards of Common Stock and other Awards that are valued in whole or in part by reference to, or are otherwise based upon
or settled in, Common Stock, including (without limitation), unrestricted stock, performance units, dividend equivalents, and
convertible debentures, may be granted under the Plan.
12.2 Cash Awards. An Award may
be in the form of a Cash Award. The terms, conditions and limitations applicable to a Cash Award, including, but not limited to,
vesting or other restrictions, shall be determined by the Committee.
Section 13
Performance Awards
13.1 General. Without
limiting the type or number of Awards that may be made under the other provisions of this Plan, an Award may be in the form of
a Performance Award. The terms, conditions and limitations applicable to an Award that is a Performance Award shall be determined
by the Committee.
13.2 Performance Awards.
shall be paid, vested or otherwise deliverable based on achievement of certain Performance Goals and will be subject to such
terms, conditions and restrictions as the Committee or its designee shall determine. Performance Goals may relate to any
one or more of the following::contract awards:
(a) backlog;
(b) market share;
(c) revenue;
(d) sales;
(e) days’ sales outstanding;
(f) overhead;
(g) other expense management;
(h) operating income;
(i) operating income margin;
(j) earnings (including net earnings,
earnings before taxes, earnings before interest and taxes and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization);
(k) earnings margin;
(l) earnings per share;
(m) cash flow;
(n) working capital;
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
127 |
Table of Contents
Appendix B: Ingevity Corporation 2025
Omnibus Incentive Plan
(o) book value per share;
(p) improvement in capital structure;
(q) credit rating;
(r) return on stockholders’
equity;
(s) return on investment or return
on invested capital;
(t) cash flow return on investment;
(u) return on assets;
(v) total stockholder return;
(w) economic profit;
(x) stock price;
(y) total contract value;
(z) annual contract value; and
(aa) client satisfaction.
Unless otherwise stated, a Performance Goal need not
be based upon an increase or positive result under a particular business criterion and could include, for example, maintaining
the status quo or limiting economic losses (measured, in each case, by reference to specific business criteria). Further,
a Performance Goal may apply to an Employee, one or more business units, divisions or sectors of the Company, or the Company as
a whole, and if so desired by the Committee, by comparison with a peer group of companies including by direct reference to peers,
by reference to an index, or by a similar mechanism.
13.3 Adjustment of Performance Awards.
The Committee may provide in any such Performance Award in writing in advance that the results may be adjusted to include
or exclude particular factors, including but not limited to any of the following events that occur during a Performance Period:
(a) asset write-downs;
(b) litigation or claim judgments
or settlements;
(c) the effect of changes in tax
laws, accounting principles, or other laws or provisions affecting reported results;
(d) any reorganization and restructuring
programs;
(e) extraordinary nonrecurring
items as described in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30 and/or in management’s discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations appearing in the Company’s annual report to shareholders for the applicable Fiscal Year;
(f) acquisitions or divestitures;
(g) foreign exchange gains and
losses; and
(h) settlement of hedging activities.
Section 14
Change in Control
14.1 General. The
provisions of this Section 14 shall, subject to Section 4.1, apply notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan to the contrary,
except to the extent the Committee specifically provides otherwise in an Award Agreement.
14.2 Impact of Change in
Control. Upon the occurrence of a Change in Control, unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement:
(a) Treatment of Replacement
Awards.
(i) To the extent that any Award
outstanding as of the date of a Change in Control is replaced by a Replacement Award (as defined in Section 14.3 below), such
Award shall not vest as a result of the Change in Control,
128 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Appendix B: Ingevity Corporation 2025
Omnibus Incentive Plan
and instead shall continue to vest and become exercisable
(as applicable) subject to the Participant’s continued service during the remaining vesting period and the satisfaction
of the other terms and conditions of the Replacement Award.
(ii) Notwithstanding the foregoing
and unless otherwise determined by the Committee and set forth in the applicable Award Agreement, upon a Qualified Termination
of Employment, (A) all Replacement Awards then held by such Participant shall vest in full, be free of restrictions, and be deemed
to be earned in full, and (B) any Replacement Award then held by such Participant that is an Option or Stock Appreciation Right
shall remain exercisable until the earlier of (I) the three-year anniversary of the Qualified Termination of Employment and (II)
the expiration of the stated full term of such Option or Stock Appreciation Right. For any Stock Award that vests pursuant to
this Section 14.2(a)(ii), (x) if such Award does not constitute “nonqualified deferred compensation” under Section
409A of the Code, the Award shall be settled within five days following the termination of employment and (y) if such Award constitutes
“nonqualified deferred compensation” under Section 409A of the Code, the Award shall be settled pursuant to the settlement
terms applicable to such Award.
(b) Treatment
of Awards that are not Replaced by Replacement Awards. To the extent that any Award outstanding as of the date of a Change
in Control is not replaced by a Replacement Award (as defined in Section 14.3 below):
(i) All such then-outstanding Options
and Stock Appreciation Rights shall become fully vested and exercisable, and all such then-outstanding Stock Awards (other than
Awards described in Section 14.2(b)(ii)) shall vest in full, be free of restrictions, and be deemed to be earned in an amount
equal to the full value of such Award. For any Stock Award that vests pursuant to this Section 14.2(b)(i), (A) if such Award does
not constitute “nonqualified deferred compensation” under Section 409A of the Code, the Award shall be settled within
five days following the Change in Control and (B) if such Award constitutes “nonqualified deferred compensation” under
Section 409A of the Code, the Award shall be settled pursuant to the settlement terms applicable to such Award.
(ii) Any performance-based Stock
Award (other than Awards described in Section 14.2(b)(i)) shall be deemed to be earned in an amount equal to the product obtained
by multiplying (A) the full value of such performance-based Award (with all applicable Performance Goals deemed achieved at the
greater of (I) the applicable target level and (II) the level of achievement of the Performance Goals for the Award as determined
by the Committee not later than the date of the Change in Control, taking into account performance through the latest date preceding
the Change in Control as to which performance can, as a practical matter, be determined (but not later than the end of the applicable
Performance Period)), and (B) the Applicable Pro-Ration Factor. For any Stock Award that vests pursuant to this Section 14.2(b)(ii),
(x) if such Award does not constitute “nonqualified deferred compensation” under Section 409A of the Code, the Award
shall be settled within five days following the Change in Control, (y) if such Award constitutes “nonqualified deferred
compensation” under Section 409A of the Code and the Change in Control is a “Change in Control Event” under
Section 409A of the Code, the Award shall be settled within five days following the Change in Control, and (z) if such Award constitutes
“nonqualified deferred compensation” under Section 409A of the Code and the Change in Control Event is not a change
in control under Section 409A of the Code, the Award shall be settled pursuant to the settlement terms applicable to such Award.
For purposes of this Section 14.2(b)(ii), with respect to any Award covered by this Section 14.2(b)(ii), “Applicable Pro-Ration
Factor” shall mean the quotient obtained by dividing the number of days that have elapsed during the applicable performance
period through and including the date of the Change in Control by the total number of days covered by the full performance period.
(iii) Notwithstanding anything
to the contrary contained in this Plan or in any Award Agreement, upon a Change in Control, the Company may settle any Awards
that constitute “nonqualified deferred compensation” under Section 409A of the Code and that are not replaced by a
Replacement Award, to the extent the settlement is effectuated in accordance with Treasury Reg. § 1.409A-3(j)(4)(ix)).
14.3 Replacement Awards.
An Award shall qualify as a “Replacement Award” if: (a) it is of the same type as the Award intended to
be replaced by the Replacement Award (the “Replaced Award”); (b) it has a value equal to the value of the Replaced
Award as of the date of the Change in Control, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion consistent with Section 4.1;
(c) the underlying Replaced Award was an equity-based Award, it relates to publicly traded equity securities of the Company or
the entity surviving the Company (or such surviving entity’s parent) following the Change in Control; (d) it contains terms
relating to vesting (including with respect to a termination of employment) that are substantially identical to those of the Replaced
Award; and (e) its other terms and conditions are not less favorable to the Participant than the terms and conditions of the Replaced
Award (including the provisions that would apply in the event of a subsequent Change in Control) as of the date of the Change
in Control. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, a Replacement Award may take the form of a continuation of the applicable
Replaced Award if the requirements of the preceding sentence are satisfied. The determination whether the conditions of this Section
14.3 are
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
129 |
Table of Contents
Appendix B: Ingevity Corporation 2025
Omnibus Incentive Plan
satisfied shall be made by the Committee, as constituted
immediately before the Change in Control, in its sole discretion.
14.4 Definition
of Change in Control. Except as otherwise may be provided in an applicable Award Agreement, for purposes of the Plan,
a “Change in Control” shall mean any of the following events:
(a) An acquisition by any individual,
entity or group (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d) (2) of the Exchange Act) (a “Person”) of beneficial
ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of 30% or more of either (i) the then-outstanding
shares of Common Stock (the “Outstanding Company Common Stock”) or (ii) the combined voting power of the then-outstanding
voting securities of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (the “Outstanding Company Voting
Securities”); excluding, however, the following: (A) any acquisition directly from the Company, other than an acquisition
by virtue of the exercise of a conversion privilege unless the security being so converted itself was acquired directly from the
Company, (B) any repurchase by the Company, (C) any acquisition by any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained
by the Company or any entity controlled by the Company, or (D) any acquisition pursuant to a transaction that complies with clauses
(i), (ii) and (iii) of subsection (c) of this Section 14.4; or
(b) A change in the composition
of the Board such that the individuals who, as of the Effective Date of the Plan, constitute the Board (such Board shall be hereinafter
referred to as the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board; provided,
however, that, for purposes of this Section 14.4(b), any individual who becomes a member of the Board subsequent to the Effective
Date of the Plan, whose election, or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders, was approved by a vote of at
least a majority of those individuals who are members of the Board and who were also members of the Incumbent Board (or deemed
to be such pursuant to this proviso) shall be considered as though such individual were a member of the Incumbent Board; provided,
further, that any such individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of either an actual or threatened election
contest with respect to the election or removal of directors or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents
by or on behalf of a Person other than the Board shall not be so considered as a member of the Incumbent Board; or
(c) The consummation of a reorganization,
merger or consolidation or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company (a “Business
Combination”); excluding, however, such a Business Combination pursuant to which (i) all or substantially all of the individuals
and entities who are the beneficial owners, respectively, of the Outstanding Company Common Stock and Outstanding Company Voting
Securities immediately prior to such Business Combination will beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of, respectively,
the outstanding shares of common stock, and the combined voting power of the then-outstanding voting securities entitled to vote
generally in the election of directors, as the case may be, of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination (including,
without limitation, a corporation that as a result of such transaction owns the Company or all or substantially all of the Company’s
assets either directly or through one or more subsidiaries) in substantially the same proportions as their ownership, immediately
prior to such Business Combination, of the Outstanding Company Common Stock and Outstanding Company Voting Securities, as the
case may be, (ii) no Person (other than the Company, any employee benefit plan (or related trust) of the Company or such corporation
resulting from such Business Combination) will beneficially own, directly or indirectly, 30% or more of, respectively, the outstanding
shares of common stock of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination or the combined voting power of the outstanding
voting securities of such corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of directors except to the extent that such ownership
derives from ownership of a 30% or more interest in the Outstanding Company Common Stock and/or Outstanding Company Voting Securities
that existed prior to the Business Combination, and (iii) individuals who were members of the Incumbent Board will constitute
at least a majority of the members of the board of directors of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination; or
(d) The approval by stockholders
of a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company.
Section 15
Taxes
The Company shall have the right
to deduct applicable taxes from any Award payment and withhold, at the time of delivery or vesting of cash or shares of Common
Stock under this Plan, an appropriate amount of cash or number of shares of Common Stock or a combination thereof for payment
of required withholding taxes or to take such other action as may be necessary in the opinion of the Company to satisfy all obligations
for withholding of such taxes. The Committee may also permit withholding to be satisfied by the transfer to the Company of shares
of Common Stock theretofore owned by the holder of the Award with respect to which withholding is required. If shares of Common
Stock
130 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Appendix B: Ingevity Corporation 2025
Omnibus Incentive Plan
are used to satisfy tax withholding, such shares shall
be valued based on the Fair Market Value when the tax withholding is required to be made.
Section 16
Term, Amendment And
Termination
(a) Effectiveness. The
Plan shall be effective as of [•], 2025 (the “Effective Date”).
(b) Termination. The Plan
will terminate on the tenth anniversary of the Effective Date. Awards outstanding as of such date shall not be affected or impaired
by the termination of the Plan.
(c) Amendment of Plan.
The Board may amend, alter, or discontinue the Plan, but no amendment, alteration or discontinuation shall be made which would
materially impair the rights of the Participant with respect to a previously granted Award without such Participant’s consent,
except such an amendment made to comply with applicable law (including without limitation Section 409A of the Code), stock exchange
rules or accounting rules. In addition, no amendment shall be made without the approval of the Company’s stockholders to
the extent such approval is required by applicable law or the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange or such other securities
exchange as may at the applicable time be the principal market for the Common Stock.
(d) Amendment of Awards.
Subject to Section 5.4, the Committee may unilaterally amend the terms of any Award theretofore granted, but no such amendment
shall, without the Participant’s consent, materially impair the rights of any Participant with respect to an Award, except
such an amendment made to cause the Plan or Award to comply with applicable law, stock exchange rules or accounting rules.
Section 17
Assignability
Unless otherwise determined by
the Committee and expressly provided for in an Award Agreement, no Award or any other benefit under this Plan shall be assignable
or otherwise transferable except (1) by will or the laws of descent and distribution or (2) pursuant to a domestic relations order
issued by a court of competent jurisdiction that is not contrary to the terms and conditions of this Plan or applicable Award
and in a form acceptable to the Committee. The Committee may prescribe and include in applicable Award Agreements other restrictions
on transfer. Any attempted assignment of an Award or any other benefit under this Plan in violation of this Section 17 shall be
null and void. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Award may be transferred for value or consideration.
Section 18
Restrictions
No Common Stock or other form
of payment shall be issued with respect to any Award unless the Company shall be satisfied based on the advice of its counsel
that such issuance will be in compliance with applicable federal and state securities laws. Certificates evidencing shares of
Common Stock delivered under this Plan (to the extent that such shares are so evidenced) may be subject to such stop transfer
orders and other restrictions as the Committee may deem advisable under the rules, regulations and other requirements of the Securities
and Exchange Commission, any securities exchange or transaction reporting system upon which the Common Stock is then listed or
to which it is admitted for quotation and any applicable federal or state securities law. The Committee may cause a legend or
legends to be placed upon such certificates (if any) to make appropriate reference to such restrictions.
Section 19
Unfunded Plan
This Plan is unfunded. Although
bookkeeping accounts may be established with respect to Participants who are entitled to cash, Common Stock or rights thereto
under this Plan, any such accounts shall be used merely as a bookkeeping convenience. The Company shall not be required to segregate
any assets that may at any time be represented by cash, Common Stock or rights thereto, nor shall this Plan be construed as providing
for such segregation, nor shall the Company, the Board or the Committee be deemed to be a trustee of any cash, Common Stock or
rights thereto to be granted under this Plan. Any liability or obligation of the Company to any Participant with respect to an
Award of cash, Common Stock or rights thereto under this Plan shall be based solely upon any contractual obligations that may
be created by this Plan and any Award Agreement, and no such liability or obligation of the Company shall be deemed to be secured
by any pledge or other encumbrance on any property of the Company. None of the Company, the Board or the Committee shall be required
to give any security or bond for the performance of any obligation that may be created by this Plan. With respect to this Plan
and any Awards granted hereunder, Participants
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
131 |
Table of Contents
Appendix B:
Ingevity Corporation 2025 Omnibus Incentive Plan
are general and unsecured creditors of the Company
and have no rights or claims except as otherwise provided in this Plan or any applicable Award Agreement.
Section 20
Code Section 409A
20.1 Awards. Awards
made under this Plan are intended to be exempt from Code Section 409A, and ambiguous provisions hereof, if any, shall be construed
and interpreted in a manner consistent with such intent. Notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the contrary, if any Plan provision
or Award under this Plan would result in the imposition of an additional tax under Code Section 409A, that Plan provision or Award
shall be reformed, to the extent permissible under Code Section 409A, to avoid imposition of the additional tax, and no such action
shall be deemed to adversely affect the Participant’s rights to an Award; provided that this Section 20.1 shall not require
the Company to incur any costs other than administrative costs.
20.2 Settlement Period.
Unless the Committee provides otherwise in an Award Agreement, each Restricted Stock Unit Award, Performance Unit Award or
Cash Award (or portion thereof if the Award is subject to a vesting schedule) shall be settled no later than the 15th day of the
third month after the end of the first calendar year in which the Award (or such portion thereof) is no longer subject to a “substantial
risk of forfeiture” within the meaning of Code Section 409A.
20.3 Specified Employees.
If the Participant is identified by the Company as a “specified employee” within the meaning of Code Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i)
on the date on which the Participant has a “separation from service” (other than due to death) within the meaning
of Treasury Regulation § 1.409A-1(h), any Award payable or settled on account of a separation from service that is nonqualified
deferred compensation subject to Code Section 409A shall be paid or settled on the earliest of (i) the first business day following
the expiration of six months from the Participant’s separation from service, (ii) the date of the Participant’s death,
or (iii) such earlier date as complies with the requirements of Code Section 409A.
Section 21
Awards to Non-U.S. Employees
Awards may be granted to Employees
who are foreign nationals or employed outside the United States, or both, on such terms and conditions different from those applicable
to Awards to Employees employed in the United States as may, in the judgment of the Committee, be necessary or desirable in order
to recognize differences in local law or tax policy. The Committee also may impose conditions on the exercise or vesting of Awards
in order to minimize the Company’s obligation with respect to tax equalization for Employees on assignments outside their
home country.
Section 22
Governing Law
This Plan and all determinations
made and actions taken pursuant hereto, to the extent not otherwise governed by mandatory provisions of the Code or the securities
laws of the United States, shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.
Section 23
Right to Continued Service
or Employment
Nothing in this Plan or an Award
Agreement shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to terminate any Participant’s
employment or other service relationship with the Company or its Subsidiaries at any time, nor confer upon any Participant any
right to continue in the capacity in which he is employed or otherwise serves the Company or its Subsidiaries.
Section 24
Usage
Words used in this Plan in the
singular shall include the plural and in the plural the singular, and the gender of words used shall be construed to include whichever
may be appropriate under any particular circumstances of the masculine, feminine or neutral genders.
Section 25
Headings
The headings in this Plan are
inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of this Plan.
132 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Appendix C: Supplemental Information
Regarding Participants in the Solicitation
Ingevity, its directors, its director nominees and
certain of its executive officers and employees are or may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies in connection
with the Annual Meeting. The following tables (“Directors and Nominees” and “Officers and Employees”)
set forth the names of our directors and director nominees and the names and present principal occupations of our executive officers
and employees who are considered to be “participants” in our solicitation of proxies from our stockholders in connection
with the Annual Meeting (collectively, the “Participants”). We will, upon request, reimburse brokerage firms and others
for their reasonable expenses in forwarding solicitation material to the beneficial owners of stock.
Directors and Nominees
The principal occupations of our directors and director
nominees, are described in the section titled “Snapshot of the Board’s Director Nominees.” The names of our
directors and director nominees are below. The business address of each of the directors and director nominees is 4920 O’Hear
Avenue, Suite 400, N. Charleston, SC 29405.
Name |
|
|
Jean S. Blackwell |
Frederick J. Lynch |
Daniel F. Sansone |
Diane H. Gulyas |
Luis Fernandez-Moreno |
J. Kevin Willis |
Bruce D. Hoechner |
Karen G. Narwold |
Benjamin G. (Shon) Wright |
Officers and Employees
The principal occupations of our executive officers
and employees who are considered Participants are set forth below. The principal occupation refers to such person’s position
with the Company and the business address of each person is 4920 O’Hear Avenue, Suite 400, North Charleston, SC 29405.
Name |
Title |
Luis Fernandez-Moreno |
Interim President and CEO |
Mary Dean Hall |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Ed Woodcock |
Executive Vice President and President, Performance Materials |
Rich White |
Senior Vice President and President, Performance Chemicals |
Ryan C. Fisher |
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary |
John E. Nypaver, Jr. |
Vice President, Treasurer and Investor Relations |
Caroline Monahan |
Senior Director, Corporate Communications |
Mavis G. Huger |
Assistant General Counsel and Assistant Secretary |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
133 |
Table of Contents
Appendix C: Supplemental Information
Regarding Participants in the Solicitation
Information Regarding Ownership of the Company’s
Securities by Participants
Information Regarding Ownership of
the Company’s Securities by Participants
The number of shares of common stock of the Company
held as of March 3, 2025 by the Participants who are directors or executive officers is set forth in the section titled “Ownership
of Equity Securities— Executive Officers and Directors” of this proxy statement.
The following table sets forth the number of shares
of common stock of the Company held as of March 3, 2025 by the additional employees of the Company who are deemed Participants
in our solicitation of proxies. The Company is unaware of any Participant who owns any securities of the Company of record that
such Participant does not own beneficially, except as described in this proxy statement.
Name |
Amount and
Nature of Beneficial Ownership(1) |
John E. Nypaver, Jr. |
1,022 |
Caroline Monahan |
222 |
Mavis G. Huger |
1,060 |
(1) |
Shares reported are directly held by the Participant. For Mr. Nypaver, Jr., the amount includes 540 RSUs that will vest within 60 days of March 3, 2025. |
Information Regarding Transactions
in Ingevity Securities by Participants - Last Two Years
The following table sets forth information regarding
purchases and sales of Ingevity’s securities by each Participant from March 1, 2023 to March 3, 2025. Unless otherwise indicated,
all transactions were in the public market or pursuant to our equity compensation plans and none of the purchase price or market
value of these securities is represented by funds borrowed or otherwise obtained for the purpose of acquiring or holding such
securities.
Name |
|
Transaction
Date |
|
Number of
Direct Shares |
|
Number of
Indirect Shares |
|
Acquisition
(A)/
Disposition
(D) Code |
|
Transaction
Codes(1) |
Jean S. Blackwell |
|
04/24/2024 |
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
04/28/2023 |
|
|
|
1,645(2) |
|
A |
|
A |
Luis Fernandez-Moreno |
|
10/02/2024 |
|
26,696 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
04/24/2024 |
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
04/28/2023 |
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
134 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Appendix C: Supplemental Information
Regarding Participants in the Solicitation
Information Regarding Transactions in Ingevity Securities
by Participants - Last Two Years
Name |
|
Transaction
Date |
|
Number of
Direct Shares |
|
Number of
Indirect Shares |
|
Acquisition
(A)/
Disposition
(D) Code |
|
Transaction
Codes(1) |
Ryan Fisher |
|
02/28/2025 |
|
4,715 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
107 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
357 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
195 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
94 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/19/2025 |
|
323 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/19/2025 |
|
158 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
07/05/2024 |
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
05/03/2024 |
|
756 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
03/25/2024 |
|
2,128 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
650 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
2,187 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
187 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
90 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/26/2024 |
|
84 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/22/2024 |
|
724 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/22/2024 |
|
338 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
03/03/2023 |
|
112 |
|
|
|
D |
|
S |
|
|
03/03/2023 |
|
106 |
|
|
|
D |
|
S |
|
|
03/03/2023 |
|
38 |
|
|
|
D |
|
S |
|
|
03/03/2023 |
|
106 |
|
|
|
D |
|
S |
|
|
03/03/2023 |
|
90 |
|
|
|
D |
|
S |
|
|
03/03/2023 |
|
100 |
|
|
|
D |
|
S |
|
|
03/02/2023 |
|
202 |
|
|
|
D |
|
S |
|
|
03/02/2023 |
|
175 |
|
|
|
D |
|
S |
|
|
03/02/2023 |
|
569 |
|
|
|
D |
|
S |
|
|
03/02/2023 |
|
1,147 |
|
|
|
D |
|
S |
|
|
03/02/2023 |
|
1,147 |
|
|
|
A |
|
M |
Diane H. Gulyas |
|
04/24/2024 |
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
04/28/2023 |
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
135 |
Table of Contents
Appendix C: Supplemental Information
Regarding Participants in the Solicitation
Information Regarding Transactions in Ingevity Securities
by Participants - Last Two Years
Name |
|
Transaction
Date |
|
Number of
Direct Shares |
|
Number of
Indirect Shares |
|
Acquisition
(A)/
Disposition
(D) Code |
|
Transaction
Codes(1) |
Mary Dean Hall |
|
02/28/2025 |
|
11,108 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
562 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
1,369 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
751 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
452 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/19/2025 |
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/19/2025 |
|
852 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
04/19/2024 |
|
2,047 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
04/19/2024 |
|
180 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
321 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
534 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
9,013 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
3,697 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/22/2024 |
|
1,558 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/22/2024 |
|
587 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
04/19/2023 |
|
1,450 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
04/19/2023 |
|
126 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
Bruce D. Hoechner |
|
04/24/2024 |
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
04/28/2023 |
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
Mavis G. Huger |
|
02/28/2025 |
|
14 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
179 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
97 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
56 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/19/2025 |
|
130 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/19/2025 |
|
47 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
10/01/2024 |
|
2,244 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
99 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
57 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
116 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
136 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Appendix C: Supplemental Information
Regarding Participants in the Solicitation
Information Regarding Transactions in Ingevity Securities
by Participants - Last Two Years
Name |
|
Transaction
Date |
|
Number of
Direct Shares |
|
Number of
Indirect Shares |
|
Acquisition
(A)/
Disposition
(D) Code |
|
Transaction
Codes(1) |
Steve Hulme |
|
02/28/2025 |
|
104 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
278 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
152 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
94 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/19/2025 |
|
336 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/19/2025 |
|
158 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
94 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
153 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
1,768 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
663 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
Frederick J. Lynch |
|
04/24/2024 |
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
04/28/2023 |
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
Caroline Monahan |
|
02/28/2025 |
|
98 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
817 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
10/02/2023 |
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
06/30/2023 |
|
7 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A(ESPP) |
|
|
03/21/2023 |
|
9 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A(ESPP) |
Karen G. Narwold |
|
04/24/2024 |
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
04/28/2023 |
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
John E. Nypaver, Jr. |
|
02/28/2025 |
|
165 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
16 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
91 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
05/14/2024 |
|
501 |
|
|
|
D |
|
S |
|
|
04/18/2024 |
|
198 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
93 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
1,379 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
126 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
09/01/2023 |
|
370 |
|
|
|
D |
|
S |
|
| 04/18/2023 |
|
171 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
Daniel F. Sansone |
|
04/24/2024 |
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
04/28/2023 |
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
137 |
Table of Contents
Appendix C: Supplemental Information
Regarding Participants in the Solicitation
Information Regarding Transactions in Ingevity Securities
by Participants - Last Two Years
Name |
|
Transaction
Date |
|
Number of
Direct Shares |
|
Number of
Indirect Shares |
|
Acquisition
(A)/
Disposition
(D) Code |
|
Transaction
Codes(1) |
Rich White |
|
02/28/2025 |
|
7,456 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
218 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
621 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
374 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
167 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/19/2025 |
|
780 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/19/2025 |
|
280 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
07/01/2024 |
|
191 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
171 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
362 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
6,097 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
2,139 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/26/2024 |
|
77 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/22/2024 |
|
845 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/22/2024 |
|
310 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
03/07/2023 |
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
D |
|
S |
J. Kevin Willis |
|
01/02/2025 |
|
570 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
12/17/2024 |
|
1,297 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
12/17/2024 |
|
519 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
138 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
Appendix C: Supplemental Information
Regarding Participants in the Solicitation
Information Regarding Transactions in Ingevity Securities
by Participants - Last Two Years
Name |
|
Transaction
Date |
|
Number of
Direct Shares |
|
Number of
Indirect Shares |
|
Acquisition (A)/
Disposition
(D) Code |
|
Transaction
Codes(1) |
Ed Woodcock |
|
02/28/2025 |
|
7,759 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
374 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
810 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
441 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2025 |
|
304 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/19/2025 |
|
1,161 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/19/2025 |
|
510 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
307 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
511 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
6,296 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/28/2024 |
|
2,905 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/26/2024 |
|
283 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/26/2024 |
|
3,192 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
|
|
02/22/2024 |
|
2,563 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
02/22/2024 |
|
1,226 |
|
|
|
D |
|
F |
Benjamin G. (Shon) Wright |
|
04/24/2024 |
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
|
|
04/28/2023 |
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
A |
|
A |
(1) |
Transaction Codes: |
|
A: |
Grant, award or other acquisition of securities from the Company (such as an
option) |
|
F: |
Payment of exercise price or tax liability by delivering or withholding securities |
|
G: |
Grant of phantom deferred stock units acquired under the Deferred Compensation
Program for Directors, under the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan |
|
J: |
Acquisition or disposition by Retirement Savings Plan |
|
M: |
Exercise or conversion of derivative security |
|
P: |
Open market or private purchase of non-derivative or derivative security |
|
S: |
Open market or private sale of non-derivative or derivative security |
(2) |
Shares held through the Jean S. Blackwell Revocable Trust, of which Ms. Blackwell is sole trustee and beneficiary. |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
139 |
Table of Contents
Appendix C: Supplemental Information
Regarding Participants in the Solicitation
Miscellaneous Information Regarding Participants in
the Solicitation
Miscellaneous Information Regarding
Participants in the Solicitation
Except as described in the proxy statement or this
Appendix C, to Ingevity’s knowledge: none of the Participants or their associates (i) during the past ten (10) years, has
been convicted in a criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations or similar misdemeanors); (ii) beneficially owns, directly
or indirectly, any shares or other securities of Ingevity or any of Ingevity’s subsidiaries; or (iii) has a substantial
interest, direct or indirect, by security holdings or otherwise, in any matter to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting. In addition,
other than as set forth in this Appendix C or the proxy statement, neither Ingevity nor any of the Participants has been within
the past year party to any contract, arrangement or understanding with any person with respect to any of our securities, including,
but not limited to, joint ventures, loan or option arrangements, puts or calls, guarantees against loss or guarantees of profit,
division of losses or profits or the giving or withholding of proxies. Other than as set forth in this Appendix C or the proxy
statement, none of the Participants or any of their associates have (i) any arrangements or understandings with any person with
respect to any future employment by Ingevity or its affiliates or with respect to any future transactions to which Ingevity or
any of its affiliates will or may be a party; or (ii) a direct or indirect material interest in any transaction or series of similar
transactions since the beginning of Ingevity’s last fiscal year or any currently proposed transactions, to which Ingevity
or any of its subsidiaries was or is to be a party in which the amount involved exceeded $120,000.
140 |
INGEVITY | 2025
Proxy Statement |
Table of Contents
