TWLO Twilio Inc

Check the appropriate box:

 ☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement

 ☐ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

☒ Definitive Proxy Statement

 ☐ Definitive Additional Materials

 ☐ Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders

We cordially invite you to attend the 2025 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Twilio Inc., a Delaware corporation, which will be held virtually on June 10, 2025 at 8:30 a.m. Pacific Time via live audio webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TWLO2025, for the following purposes, as more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement:

The Annual Meeting will be a virtual meeting held via live audio webcast. You will be able to attend the meeting, vote your shares and submit your questions during the meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TWLO2025. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting either via the internet, by telephone or by mail to help make this meeting format as efficient as possible.

Our board of directors has fixed the close of business on April 15, 2025 as the record date for the Annual Meeting. Only stockholders of record as of the close of business on April 15, 2025 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Further information regarding voting rights and the matters to be voted upon are presented in the accompanying proxy statement.

This proxy statement and our annual report can be accessed directly at www.proxyvote.com. You will be asked to enter the 16-digit control number located on your proxy card.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to submit your vote as soon as possible to ensure that your shares are represented. For additional instructions on how to vote your shares, please refer to your proxy card. Voting your shares by proxy prior to the Annual Meeting does not deprive you of your right to attend the Annual Meeting and to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting.

* * *

This proxy statement and the enclosed form of proxy are furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our board of directors for use at the 2025 annual meeting of stockholders of Twilio Inc., a Delaware corporation (referred to in this proxy statement as “Twilio,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”), and any postponements, adjournments or continuations thereof (the “Annual Meeting”).

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not intended to be incorporated by reference into this proxy statement and references to our website address in this proxy statement are inactive textual references only.

The Annual Meeting will be held virtually on June 10, 2025 at 8:30 a.m. Pacific Time via live audio webcast. We encourage you to access the Annual Meeting before it begins. Online check-in will start at approximately 8:15 a.m. Pacific Time on June 10, 2025. You will be able to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, vote your shares electronically and submit your questions during the live audio webcast of the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TWLO2025 and entering your 16-digit control number located on your proxy card. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) containing instructions on how to access this proxy statement and our annual report is first being mailed on or about April 25, 2025 to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Additional information about these proxy materials and the Annual Meeting is provided in “question and answer” format commencing on page 85 of this proxy statement.

We envision a world in which every digital interaction between businesses and their customers is amazing. We aim to deliver the leading customer engagement platform that intelligently orchestrates customer engagement across the entire customer life cycle by combining our leading communications capabilities, plus rich contextual data, plus generative and predictive artificial intelligence (“AI”). Our trusted, simple, and smart platform provides developers with tools to build, scale, and deploy real-time communications within software applications, while simultaneously offering technology that allows businesses to harness the power of contextual data to develop more informed insights about their customers.

We enable businesses to revolutionize how they engage with their customers by delivering seamless, trusted, and personalized customer experiences at scale. We offer communications application programming interfaces (“APIs”) that enable developers to embed numerous forms of messaging, voice, email, and video interactions into their customer-facing applications, as well as software products that target specific engagement needs, including our customer data platform, digital engagement centers, marketing campaigns, and user authentication and identity solutions. This combination of flexible APIs and software solutions helps businesses of all sizes and across numerous industries to benefit from smarter and more streamlined engagement at every step of the customer journey, including reduced customer acquisition costs, lasting loyalty, and increased customer value. Our platform, which combines our highly customizable communications APIs with customer data management capabilities and AI-powered predictions and recommendations, allows businesses to break down data silos and build a comprehensive single source for their customer data that is organized into unique profiles that are easily accessible by all their business teams. Empowered with this information and the insights it enables, businesses using our platform can provide robust, personalized, and effective communications to their customers at every stage of their customer relationships at scale. The value proposition of our offerings has become stronger and our products have become more strategic to our customers as businesses are increasingly prioritizing building more personalized and differentiated customer engagement experiences through digital channels.

Over the past two years, we have taken action to better position our business to drive durable, profitable growth and attractive stockholder returns, amid an evolving operating environment. Key actions include:

We are focused on creating long-term value for our stockholders by continuing to drive durable, profitable growth. Our 2024 financial highlights include the following:

Our corporate governance practices are described in the section titled “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance” below, including the following highlights:

Twilio is committed to strong corporate governance. We believe that robust corporate governance policies and practices are critical to the effective management of our business, helping ensure that our business functions at its best and serves the long-term interests of our stockholders.

Since becoming a public company in 2016, our board and governance practices have evolved to reflect our strategic priorities, the changing needs of our business, practices of our peers and stockholder feedback.

As part of this evolution, we have regularly refreshed our board, with seven of nine independent directors added subsequent to the IPO and four of those added since the beginning of 2021, including most recently appointing Andrew Stafman, a stockholder representative, who provides valuable equity investor perspectives. Our thoughtful and deliberate board refreshment process has focused on adding critical skills and qualifications to our board to help Twilio navigate strategic opportunities and challenges. Moreover, as part of this refreshment process, we have sought highly qualified directors representing a diverse range of expertise, backgrounds, and perspectives, leading to a board that is composed of directors with a wide range of skills and experiences relevant to Twilio.

In 2023, our dual class common stock structure was sunset, providing all stockholders with identical voting rights.

In January 2024, Khozema Shipchandler was appointed Chief Executive Officer, an appointment which reflected the board's thoughtful and long-term approach to succession planning. In January 2024 our board of directors also made the decision to separate the roles of board chair and Chief Executive Officer and appointed Jeff Epstein to the role of independent board chair. Mr. Epstein had previously served as our lead independent director since December 2017.

At our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders, we sought stockholder approval to declassify our board of directors. We did not receive such approval, so we are resubmitting the proposal at this year’s Annual Meeting. If approved, directors standing for election would be elected to one-year terms beginning at our 2026 annual meeting of stockholders.

In January 2025, we amended our bylaws to eliminate supermajority voting provisions, and at this year’s Annual Meeting, we are seeking stockholder approval to eliminate supermajority voting provisions from our amended and restated certificate of incorporation (our “certificate of incorporation”).

An important consideration in all of our corporate governance decisions is stockholder feedback. In 2023, we enhanced our stockholder engagement program by implementing a year-round outreach and feedback process featuring formal meetings with our stockholders in the spring and fall, and we carefully consider what we hear from our stockholders. Many of the changes to both our corporate governance and executive compensation practices in recent years reflect the board’s incorporation of this important feedback. Our stockholder engagement program is discussed in further detail below under the heading “Stockholder Engagement”.

We are committed to ensuring that our corporate governance practices, as part of our broader strategy and maturation process, best position Twilio for future success. We will continue to evaluate and evolve our corporate governance profile, taking into account the best interests of the Company and feedback we receive from our stockholders.

We have a robust, board-led stockholder engagement program that we use to ensure the perspectives of our stockholders are understood and incorporated into Twilio’s decision making. Throughout the year, our board of directors and management regularly review and consider feedback received from our stockholders, including through meetings with stockholders, voting results, and other routine communications. This dialogue facilitates transparency, helps us better understand the perspectives of our stockholders and allows our board of directors to make better informed decisions throughout the year.

 

In the course of our discussions with stockholders, we have received valuable feedback on our compensation and corporate governance practices, as summarized in the chart below. This feedback was conveyed to our full board of directors and relevant committees for consideration in their decision making. Our consideration of the feedback from stockholders regarding our compensation of our named executive officers is further discussed in “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Stockholder Feedback and Our Annual Say-on-Pay Vote”.

Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of a highly independent, experienced and qualified board of directors. Our board of directors, through our nominating and corporate governance committee, proactively evaluates its composition in the context of our company’s evolving business needs and has taken a thoughtful approach to board composition. Our board of directors and the nominating and corporate governance committee believe the skills, qualities, attributes, experience and backgrounds of our directors provide us with the right range of perspectives to effectively address our evolving needs and represent the best interests of our stockholders. Our board of directors also oversees our stockholder engagement program and reviews investor feedback, which allows us to better understand the perspectives of our stockholders and to take this feedback into account as we shape the composition of our board of directors.

Our board of directors currently consists of nine directors. All of our board members, other than Mr. Shipchandler (and, during his time on our board of directors, Mr. Lawson), qualify as “independent” under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. Our board of directors is divided into three classes of directors. At each annual meeting of stockholders, a class of directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the class whose term is then expiring. The effect that the management proposal to amend our certificate of incorporation to declassify the board of directors will have on the three director classes and their respective terms of office is described below under the heading “Proposal 4—Management Proposal to Amend Our Certificate of Incorporation to Declassify the Board of Directors.”

The following table sets forth the names, ages as of March 31, 2025, and certain other information for each of the members of our board of directors with terms expiring at the Annual Meeting (who are also nominees for election as a director at the Annual Meeting) and for each of the continuing members of our board of directors.

Our nominating and corporate governance committee periodically evaluates the composition of our board of directors in the context of our company’s evolving business needs to ensure that our directors have the skillsets, experiences and backgrounds that collectively add value to the strategic decisions made by our company, that enable them to provide oversight of management, risk, business operations, and corporate strategy, and that allow our board of directors to best fulfill its responsibilities to the long-term interests of our stockholders. This has resulted in the addition of four new independent directors to our board of directors since the beginning of 2021. Summarized below are the skills and experience that we consider important for our directors in light of our business strategy, structure, and market dynamics. Our board of directors and the nominating and corporate governance committee believe the skills, qualities, attributes, experience and diversity of backgrounds of our directors provide us with a broad range of perspectives to effectively address our evolving needs and represent the best interests of our stockholders.

Our Class A common stock (“common stock”) is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Under the listing standards of the NYSE (the “NYSE Listing Standards”), independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company’s board of directors. In addition, the NYSE Listing Standards require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation, and nominating and corporate governance committees be independent. Under the NYSE Listing Standards, a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if, in the opinion of that listed company’s board of directors, that director does not have a material relationship with the listed company (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with such listed company).

Audit committee members must also satisfy the additional independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and the NYSE Listing Standards. Compensation committee members must also satisfy the additional independence criteria set forth in Rule 10C-1 under the Exchange Act and the NYSE Listing Standards.

Our board of directors has undertaken a review of the independence of each director. Based on information provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, our board of directors has determined that Messrs. Bell, Epstein, Immelt, Patrick and Stafman (and Mr. Deeter during his board service), and Mses. Dubinsky, Rottenberg and Suzuki do not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors is “independent” as that term is defined under the NYSE Listing Standards. In making these determinations, our board of directors considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with our company and all other facts and circumstances our board of directors deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director, and the transactions involving them described in the section titled “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.” None of our non-employee directors have been employed by our company over the last five years.

Our board of directors periodically reviews its leadership structure. In January 2024, our board of directors decided that it would be in the best interests of our company and our stockholders to separate the positions of board chair and Chief Executive Officer. As a result, the roles are currently separated, and Mr. Epstein, an independent director, serves as board chair. We believe that the structure of our board of directors, with Mr. Shipchandler acting as Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Epstein acting as board chair, and all-independent committees overseeing our company’s operations, risks, performance and strategy, provides the most effective governance framework at this time and allows us to benefit from Mr. Epstein’s independent oversight, while enabling Mr. Shipchandler to focus his attention on our business operations and strategy. We believe that an independent board chair helps further facilitate relations between our board of directors, our Chief Executive Officer and other senior management, assists our board of directors in reaching consensus on particular strategies and policies, fosters robust evaluation processes, and efficiently allocates oversight responsibilities between the independent directors and management.

In accordance with our corporate governance guidelines, if our board chair were not an independent director, our board of directors would appoint an independent director to serve as lead independent director.

As board chair, Mr. Epstein presides over meetings of our board of directors, works with senior management to prepare agendas for such meetings, serves as a liaison to facilitate and promote communication between senior management and the board of directors, leads engagement with stockholders on behalf of the board, assists in the board’s oversight of key governance matters, and undertakes such additional duties as the board of directors determines.

Mr. Epstein is an experienced director who has served as an empowered, independent voice on our board of directors since 2017. Having served as our lead independent director and chair of our audit committee, he possesses an in-depth knowledge of our company’s strategy, operations and risks, as well as the demonstrated leadership and relationships to render him an effective liaison with senior management and a respected, expert leader on our board of directors. We believe our company and our stockholders also benefit from Mr. Epstein’s extensive outside expertise and perspective, having served for many years in senior management and board leadership roles at numerous other public companies.

Our board of directors believes that Mr. Epstein is a strong and effective board chair, serving as an independent voice at the forefront of our leadership structure.

Our independent directors regularly meet in executive sessions led by the board chair after meetings of the board of directors and committees, as needed. These executive sessions allow our independent directors to discuss, without management present, our strategy, the performance and compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other senior management, effectiveness of our board of directors, and other matters.

Only independent directors serve on the audit committee, the nominating and corporate governance committee and the compensation committee, which we believe provides strong independent leadership and oversight for each of these committees. As a result of the board of directors’ committee system, the independence of our board chair and the existence of a significant majority of independent directors, our board of directors believes it maintains effective oversight of our business operations, including independent oversight of our financial statements, executive compensation, selection of director candidates, stockholder outreach efforts, and corporate governance programs.

Our board of directors may establish the authorized number of directors from time to time by resolution. Our board of directors currently consists of nine members.

During 2024, our board of directors held nine meetings (including regularly scheduled and special meetings), and each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of our board of directors held during the period for which he or she had been a director and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of our board of directors on which he or she served during the periods that he or she served.

Although our corporate governance guidelines do not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of our board of directors at annual meetings of stockholders, we encourage, but do not require, our directors to attend. All members of our board of directors then serving in such capacity attended our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders.

Our board of directors has established an audit committee, a compensation and talent management committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee. The composition and responsibilities of each of the committees of our board of directors is described below. Members serve on these committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by our board of directors.

The board of directors has delegated to the nominating and corporate governance committee the responsibility of identifying suitable candidates for nomination to the board of directors (including candidates to fill any vacancies that may occur) and assessing their qualifications in light of the policies and principles in our corporate governance guidelines and the committee’s charter. The nominating and corporate governance committee uses a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating director nominees, including retaining a third-party search firm from time to time to identify and review candidates for membership on our board of directors. The nominating and corporate governance committee may gather information about the candidates through interviews, detailed questionnaires, comprehensive background checks or any other means that the nominating and corporate governance committee deems to be appropriate in the evaluation process. The nominating and corporate governance committee then meets as a group to discuss and evaluate the qualities and skills of each candidate, both on an individual basis and taking into account the overall composition and needs of the board of directors. Based on the results of the evaluation process, the nominating and corporate governance committee recommends candidates for the board of directors’ approval as director nominees for election to the board of directors.

On March 2024, we entered into a cooperation agreement (the “Cooperation Agreement”) with Sachem Head Capital Management LP and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “Sachem Head”). Pursuant to the Cooperation Agreement, our board of directors appointed Andrew Stafman to the board of directors as a Class II director in March 2024 and Mr. Stafman was re-elected as a director by our stockholders at our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders.

The Cooperation Agreement provides for customary director replacement rights, pursuant to which we and Sachem Head have agreed to cooperate to select a successor director in the event Mr. Stafman ceases to serve as a director. Our obligation with respect to the replacement of Mr. Stafman upon departure from the board of directors terminates in certain circumstances, including if Sachem Head’s aggregate net long position in the Company falls below 50% of its beneficial ownership of our outstanding shares of common stock as of the date of the Cooperation Agreement.

The Cooperation Agreement will remain effective until the later of (i) 30 calendar days after the date on which Mr. Stafman (or any replacement director) has ceased to serve on our board of directors and (ii) one calendar day following the conclusion of the Annual Meeting. The foregoing description does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Cooperation Agreement, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 1, 2024, and is incorporated by reference herein.

We have a highly effective and engaged board of directors, and members of our board of directors are expected to prepare for, attend, and participate in all board of directors and applicable committee meetings and are encouraged to attend our annual meetings of stockholders. The board of directors does not believe that explicit limits on the number of other boards of directors on which the directors may serve, or on other activities the directors may pursue, are appropriate. Rather, we believe that our directors’ service on other companies’ boards enables them to contribute valuable knowledge and perspective to our board of directors. Nonetheless, the board of directors recognizes that carrying out the duties of a director requires a significant commitment of time and attention, and excessive time commitments—whether other board service or otherwise—may interfere with the ability to fulfill our board of director responsibilities. Our corporate governance guidelines require directors to notify the chair of the nominating and corporate governance committee in connection with an invitation to join the board of directors of another company, whether public or private. Directors must also regularly update the Company regarding directorships and similar positions, so that the potential for conflicts or other factors that may compromise a director’s ability to perform their duties may be fully assessed.

Our board of directors has delegated to our nominating and corporate governance committee the responsibility of identifying suitable candidates for nomination to our board of directors (including candidates to fill any vacancies that may occur) and assessing their qualifications in light of the policies and principles in our corporate governance guidelines and the nominating and corporate governance committee’s charter. Our nominating and corporate governance committee uses a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating director nominees, which may include consultation with a third-party search firm, and considers all facts and circumstances that it deems appropriate or advisable. In its identification and evaluation of director candidates, our nominating and corporate governance committee considers the current size and composition of our board of directors and the needs of our board of directors and the respective committees of our board of directors. We seek to have a board composed of highly qualified directors representing a diverse range of expertise, backgrounds, and perspectives, and we

require that the nominating and corporate governance committee (and any third-party search firm that it engages) include, in each initial director search pool, qualified candidates who reflect diverse backgrounds, including diversity of gender and race/ethnicity. While we strive for a diverse mix of candidates and perspectives, all decisions are made without regard to gender, race/ethnicity, or other protected characteristics and we do not maintain a policy with respect to any specific number of diverse individuals on our board of directors. We do not utilize term or age limits, as our board of directors does not believe that arbitrary limits on the number of consecutive terms a director may serve or on a director’s age are appropriate in light of the substantial benefits resulting from a sustained focus on the Company’s business, strategy and industry over a significant period of time. Some of the qualifications that our nominating and corporate governance committee considers include:

In addition to the above criteria, our nominating and corporate governance committee may also consider such other factors as it may deem, from time to time, to be in our and our stockholders’ best interests.

Our nominating and corporate governance committee reviews the totality of the circumstances of each nominee and each board member to assess the ability of such individuals to devote the requisite time to fulfilling the responsibilities of service on our board of directors and applicable committees. Our nominating and corporate governance committee evaluates many factors when assessing the effectiveness and active involvement of each director, including the director’s attendance at board and committee meetings, participation and level of engagement during these meetings, the director’s other time commitments, the role played by the director on our board of directors and on any other boards, including committee membership and chair designation, and the experience and expertise of the director, including both relevant industry experience and service on other public company boards, which may enable the director to serve on multiple boards effectively.

Our nominating and corporate governance committee also considers these and other factors as it oversees the annual board of directors and committee evaluations. After completing its review and evaluation of director candidates, our nominating and corporate governance committee recommends to our full board of directors the director nominees for selection.

Annually, our nominating and corporate governance committee works with an outside advisor to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of our board of directors, its committees and its individual members. The evaluation aims (i) to find opportunities where our board of directors and committees can improve their performance and effectiveness, (ii) to assess any need to evolve the composition and expertise of our board of directors and (iii) to assure that our board of directors and committees are operating in accordance with our corporate governance guidelines and committee charters. The collection of information is facilitated by an outside advisor to preserve integrity and anonymity of the members of our board of directors and the Company’s senior executives.

The nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for designing the evaluation process and establishing the evaluation criteria. During the evaluation process, the outside advisor collects feedback from each director and members of our senior management team, and then the results of the evaluation and any recommendations for improvement are provided to our nominating and corporate governance committee and our board of directors. The board of directors and senior executives of the Company review and discuss the evaluation results and any actions to be taken as a result of the discussion. Our board of directors, including our nominating and corporate governance committee, uses the results to inform board and committee composition, including considering the attributes and experience that are criteria for membership on our board of directors, and to address the evolving needs of our company.

Risk is inherent with every business, and we face a number of risks, including strategic, financial, business and operational, cybersecurity, legal and compliance, and reputational. We have designed and implemented processes to manage risk in our operations as part of our enterprise risk management (“ERM”) approach. Management is responsible for the day-to-day oversight and management of risks we face, while our board of directors, as a whole and assisted by its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. In addition, every employee is required to complete data privacy, cybersecurity and code of conduct training upon joining our company and each year thereafter. In its risk oversight role, our board of directors has the responsibility to satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are appropriate and functioning as designed. As part of this approach, our board considers both the materiality of a risk and its immediacy in making strategic decisions and helping management to prioritize resources.

Our board of directors recognizes the critical importance of maintaining the trust and confidence of our customers, business partners and employees. Our board of directors is actively involved in oversight of our risk management program, and cybersecurity represents an important component of our overall approach to ERM. Our board of directors’ oversight of cybersecurity risk is supported by our audit committee, which regularly interacts with our ERM function, our Chief Digital Officer, our Chief Information Security Officer, other members of management, and relevant committees and working groups in its oversight of cybersecurity-related risks. Our board of directors has previously received quarterly updates from our audit committee on ERM and cybersecurity risks after the audit committee is updated by management. As a reflection of the importance we place on managing and overseeing cybersecurity risk, our management now provides quarterly updates directly to the board of directors starting in 2025.

Our board of directors, in coordination with our audit committee, is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic risk exposure. Our audit committee receives regular presentations and reports on cybersecurity risks, which address a wide range of topics including recent developments, evolving standards, vulnerability assessments, third-party and independent reviews, the threat environment, technological trends and information security considerations arising with respect to our peers and third parties, and risks relating to cybersecurity incidents.

We recognize the impact that we can have on our surrounding community and environment, and we are committed to being a responsible corporate citizen. We also value our employees and recognize the critical roles that they play in our overall success and achieving the long-term goals of our company and stockholders. The following summarizes some of the ways in which we foster positive impact in our communities and for our stakeholders.

We are committed to sound governance and oversight of our impact on the communities where we operate and the environment. Our board of directors has delegated formal oversight of these responsible business practices to our nominating and corporate governance committee. Our audit committee and compensation committee also play key roles in related risk oversight.

We recognize the impact that companies can have on the environment and our goal is to limit our environmental impact and to carry out our business activities in a sustainable manner. We are working to integrate sustainability initiatives into our business practices by: (i) evaluating energy conservation initiatives and renewable energy purchases to improve energy efficiency of our operations; (ii) working with our data center and cloud computing partners to measure our emissions; working to minimize data center energy use by utilizing containerization, server virtualization, selecting efficient equipment that meets environmental industry standards, and streamlining our code to reduce energy consumption; additionally, some of our co-location and cloud computing partners have established 100% renewable energy goals; (iii) managing our business travel and educating our suppliers on sustainability; (iv) monitoring our water usage and creating a systematic global approach to responsibly dispose of our electronic waste, including through participation in vendor buy-back programs or e-cycling; and (v) fostering the promotion of conservation by recycling, composting, and source reduction in all of our offices globally.