URBN Urban Outfitters Inc

Dear Shareholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Urban Outfitters, Inc. to be held at 9:00 a.m., on Wednesday, June 4, 2025 (the “Annual Meeting”). We will conduct our Annual Meeting in a virtual format, via live audio webcast. We believe that a virtual meeting provides a larger number of shareholders with equal or greater access and ability to participate than an in-person meeting. During the virtual meeting, you may ask questions and will be able to vote your shares electronically. Shareholders can access the Annual Meeting by visiting https://web.lumiconnect.com/270154195 (password: urban2025).

The matters to be considered and voted upon are described in the 2025 Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the Proxy Statement that accompany this letter. It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the Annual Meeting. Kindly read the attached Proxy Statement and vote your shares at the meeting, over the Internet, by telephone or, if you received one, by signing and dating the paper copy of the proxy card and returning it promptly.

I look forward to your virtual participation at the Annual Meeting where we will review the business and operations of Urban Outfitters, Inc.

Sincerely,

Richard A. Hayne Chairman of the Board

DATE: April 1, 2025

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

5000 South Broad Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19112-1495

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

June 4, 2025

TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Urban Outfitters, Inc. (the “Company”) will be conducted as follows:

The Board of Directors of the Company unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the election of each of the nominees for director listed in Proposal 1, and “FOR” Proposals 2 and 3.

The Board of Directors of the Company has fixed April 1, 2025, as the record date for determining which shareholders are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting of Shareholders or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

DATE: April 1, 2025

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

5000 South Broad Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19112-1495

PROXY STATEMENT

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

The Board of Directors of Urban Outfitters, Inc. (the “Company”) is furnishing this proxy statement to solicit proxies from the Company’s shareholders for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”), to be held on Wednesday, June 4, 2025, at 9:00 a.m., and any adjournments or postponements thereof. We will conduct our Annual Meeting in a virtual format, via live audio webcast at https://web.lumiconnect.com/270154195. Based on the last five years of experience, the Company believes that a virtual meeting will provide equal or better access and participation options for more shareholders than an in-person meeting. During the virtual meeting, shareholders may ask questions and will be able to vote their shares electronically.

The Company is making its proxy statement (this “Proxy Statement”) and its annual report to shareholders available electronically via the Internet. On or before April 25, 2025, we will mail to our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) containing instructions on how to access this Proxy Statement and our annual report and how to vote. Shareholders who receive the Notice will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail, although a proxy card will be mailed separately to each shareholder that beneficially owns more than 1,000 of the Company’s common shares, par value $.0001 per share (the “Common Shares”). If you would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice.

Only shareholders of record, as shown on the transfer books of the Company at the close of business on April 1, 2025 (the “Record Date”), are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. On March 11, 2025, there were 92,809,665 Common Shares outstanding. Shareholders of record on the Record Date may vote (i) by Internet by visiting the website specified in the Notice and on the proxy card, (ii) by telephone using the instructions provided in the Notice and on the proxy card, (iii) electronically at the Annual Meeting or (iv) by marking, executing and returning the proxy card, in accordance with the instructions thereon. Shareholders who hold their Common Shares in “street name” through a bank, broker or other holder of record (a “nominee”) must vote their Common Shares in the manner prescribed by their nominee.

Presence at the Annual Meeting, via webcast or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the Common Shares entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum, which is required for the Company to conduct business at the Annual Meeting. Each Common Share entitles the holder to one vote on each matter presented at the Annual Meeting. When voting is properly authorized

1

over the Internet, by telephone or electronically at the Annual Meeting or proxy cards are properly dated, executed and returned, the Common Shares will be voted in accordance with the instructions of the shareholder.

Any shareholder giving a proxy has the power to revoke it prior to its exercise either by giving written notice to the Secretary of the Company, by voting electronically at the Annual Meeting, by executing a subsequent proxy card or by submitting a subsequent proxy over the Internet or by telephone. Shareholders who hold their Common Shares in “street name” must obtain a legal proxy from their nominee in order to vote at the Annual Meeting and must otherwise follow instructions provided by their nominee with respect to revocation of voting instructions. After obtaining a legal proxy from their nominee, shareholders who hold their Common Shares in “street name” may register to attend the Annual Meeting by submitting proof of their legal proxy reflecting the number of their shares along with their name and email address to Equiniti Trust Company, LLC (f/k/a American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC) (“ETC”). Requests for registration should be directed to proxy@equiniti.com or to facsimile number (718) 921-8124. Written requests can be mailed to:

Equiniti Trust Company, LLC

Attn: Proxy Tabulation Department

55 Challenger Road 2^nd floor

Ridgefield Park, New Jersey 07660

Requests for registration must be labeled as “Legal Proxy” and be received no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 29, 2025. Shareholders who hold their Common Shares in “street name” and register to attend the Annual Meeting will receive confirmation of registration by email after ETC receives their registration materials.

The following table summarizes the vote threshold required for approval of each proposal and the effect on the outcome of the vote of abstentions and uninstructed shares held by nominees. When a shareholder who holds his or her Common Shares in “street name” does not provide voting instructions to his or her nominee, the nominee may not vote those shares on matters deemed non-routine (referred to as broker non-votes). Proposals 1 and 3 below are non-routine matters.

Signed but unmarked proxy cards will be voted “FOR” the election of each of the nominees for director listed in Proposal 1, “FOR” Proposals 2 and 3, and in accordance with the judgment of the persons voting the proxies with respect to such other matters as may come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

2

3

PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Company’s Amended and Restated By-laws (the “By-laws”) provide for the Board of Directors to be composed of as many directors as are designated from time to time by the Board of Directors. Currently, there are ten directors, all of whom are standing for re-election. Each director elected shall serve for a term of one year and until a successor is elected and qualified.

Unless otherwise directed, the persons named on the proxy intend to vote all valid proxies received by them “FOR” the election of the listed nominees. In the event any of the nominees shall be unable or unwilling to serve as a director, the persons named on the proxy intend to vote “FOR” the election of any person as may be nominated by the Board of Directors in substitution. The Company has no reason to believe that any of the nominees named below will be unable or unwilling to serve as a director if elected.

A nominee for election as a director must receive a majority of the votes cast to be elected. A majority of the votes cast means that the number of the votes cast “for” a nominee must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that nominee. Each shareholder is entitled to only one vote per share in the election of directors and each director nominee is voted upon separately. If an incumbent director who is a candidate for re-election is not elected, the director will be deemed to have tendered his or her resignation to the Board of Directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Nominating Committee”) will make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether other action should be taken, and the Board of Directors will be required to act on the Nominating Committee’s recommendation and disclose its decision and the rationale for the decision.

The nominees for re-election to the Board of Directors are Edward N. Antoian, Kelly Campbell, Harry S. Cherken, Jr., Mary C. Egan, Margaret A. Hayne, Richard A. Hayne, Amin N. Maredia, Wesley S. McDonald, Todd R. Morgenfeld and John C. Mulliken. The Board of Directors has determined that eight of the nominees, Messrs. Edward N. Antoian, Harry S. Cherken, Jr., Amin N. Maredia, Wesley S. McDonald, Todd R. Morgenfeld, John C. Mulliken, Ms. Kelly Campbell and Ms. Mary C. Egan, are independent under the listing standards of the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”). The Board of Directors believes that all of its directors possess personal and professional integrity, good judgment, a high level of ability and business acumen, and have performed exceptionally well in their respective time served as directors.

Mr. Antoian, 69, has been a Principal and Senior Strategic Advisor with Sequoia Financial Group since March 2023. From January 2008 until February 2023, Mr. Antoian was a partner at Zeke Capital Advisors, a financial advisory firm of which he is a founder. From 1997 until March 2019, Mr. Antoian was a partner and Senior Portfolio Manager at Chartwell Investment Partners. Prior to that, Mr. Antoian worked at Delaware Management Co. as a Senior Portfolio Manager and at

4

E.F. Hutton in Institutional Sales and as a certified public accountant for Price Waterhouse. Mr. Antoian holds an MBA in Finance and has financial and investment experience as a result of his experience as a CFA, CPA, financial advisor and portfolio manager. Mr. Antoian serves as a director of a not-for-profit entity and three private companies. As an independent director, Mr. Antoian brings his in-depth understanding of, and expertise in, finance and accounting to the Board of Directors.

Ms. Campbell, 47, was most recently the President of Peacock, NBCUniversal’s streaming service, a position she has held since November 1, 2021. On January 8, 2025, Ms. Campbell announced her plan to step down from her position at Peacock, effective March 15, 2025. Prior to joining Peacock, Ms. Campbell served as President of Hulu from February 2020 to October 2021 and as Chief Marketing Officer of Hulu from August 2017 to February 2020. From 2005 to 2017, Ms. Campbell held a variety of roles at Google across the Google Ads and Google Cloud businesses. Ms. Campbell brings extensive experience in Marketing and subscription businesses to the Company’s Board of Directors.

Mr. Cherken, 75, retired from the law firm of Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on December 31, 2022. Mr. Cherken was a partner of that firm from November 1984 to January 2020 and Senior Counsel from January 2020 to December 2022. Mr. Cherken also formerly served as managing partner of the firm and as either Chair or Co-Chair of its Real Estate Group for 18 years. As a real estate lawyer for over 45 years representing public and private companies in the acquisition, construction, development, financing, leasing, management, consolidation and disposition of commercial real estate, he has extensive experience with various types of real estate transactions and retail leases, including negotiating real estate transactions and leases on behalf of the Company nearly from its inception. He also holds a Masters in Liberal Arts degree and serves as a trustee of various not-for-profit entities and academic institutions. In 2021, Mr. Cherken was appointed Honorary Consul for Philadelphia of the Republic of Armenia.

Ms. Egan, 57, has been advising consumer brand, primarily high growth private equity and venture-capital backed, companies since 2018, currently as principal of Egan Advisory Group. In 2013, Ms. Egan founded Gatheredtable, a consumer software as a service company offering customized meal planning, and served as its Chief Executive Officer until Gatheredtable was sold to a strategic buyer in 2018. From 2010 to 2012, Ms. Egan served as head of global strategy and corporate development for Starbucks Corporation and in 2012 led Starbucks’ food category in the Americas. From 1996 to 2010, Ms. Egan was a management consultant and Managing Director at The Boston Consulting Group, where she partnered with several leading consumer and retail brands to develop and successfully implement aggressive growth strategies. Ms. Egan

5

previously served as a director of American Campus Communities (ACC) from 2018 until the company was purchased by Blackstone in 2022; she presently serves as a director of Noodles & Company (NDLS) as well as the non-profit Kripalu Center for Yoga and Health. Ms. Egan’s decades of experience partnering with management teams to develop and implement consumer-centric strategies for high growth omni-channel consumer brands, as well as working extensively with founders and entrepreneurs, gives her a unique set of skills to contribute to the Board of Directors.

Ms. Hayne, 66, joined the Company in August 1982. She is an over 40-year veteran of the retail and wholesale industry. She has served as Co-President of the Company since October 2020 and as Chief Creative Officer of Urban Outfitters, Inc. since November 2013. Ms. Hayne previously served as Chief Executive Officer of Free People from August 2015 until October 2020 and President of Free People from March 2007 until August 2016. Richard A. Hayne, the Company’s current Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is Ms. Hayne’s spouse. Azeez Hayne, Chief Administrative Officer of the Company, is Ms. Hayne’s nephew. As an employee of the Company for over 40 years and a director since 2013, Ms. Hayne brings a wealth of both Company-specific and industry-wide knowledge and experience to the Board of Directors.

Mr. Hayne, 77, co-founded Urban Outfitters in 1970. He has been Chairman of the Board of Directors since the Company’s incorporation in 1976 and, until February 2016, also served as the Company’s President. Mr. Hayne served as the Company’s principal executive officer until 2007 and again beginning in January 2012. Margaret A. Hayne, Co-President and Chief Creative Officer of Urban Outfitters, Inc., is Mr. Hayne’s spouse. Azeez Hayne, Chief Administrative Officer of the Company, is Mr. Hayne’s nephew. Mr. Hayne’s long tenure leading the Company as Chairman of the Board of Directors, his tenure as principal executive officer and his exceptional leadership skills make him uniquely qualified to serve as a director.

Mr. Maredia, 52, is a Co-founder of, and Managing Partner since 2018, at Meaningful Partners, a consumer-focused fund that invests across the consumer value chain. Previously, Mr. Maredia served as the Chief Executive Officer of Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) (“Sprouts”), the second largest healthy grocer in the United States, beginning in 2015. He also served on the board of directors of Sprouts. Mr. Maredia served as Chief Financial Officer of Sprouts from 2011 to 2015. Before Sprouts, Mr. Maredia served in key global strategic roles at Burger King Corporation, including leading strategy, global business development and finance. Mr. Maredia has also been deeply involved in local and global community work for over two decades around health, education and economic development with various domestic and global organizations. Mr. Maredia attended the Harvard Business School management program and has an undergraduate degree in Accounting from the University of Houston. Mr. Maredia’s in-depth

6

experience in the consumer sector, including multi-unit and high growth omni-channel businesses, as well as his public company experience as Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and board member provides him valuable expertise to serve as a director.

Mr. McDonald, 62, has been retired since 2017. Previously, he served as Chief Financial Officer of Kohl’s Corporation (KSS) from 2003 to 2017. Before joining Kohl’s, Mr. McDonald served as Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). Earlier in his career, he held several positions of increasing responsibility at Target Corporation (TGT). Mr. McDonald currently serves on the Board of Directors of Wingstop Inc., which operates and franchises over 2,000 stores worldwide. Mr. McDonald’s experience as a chief financial officer and in other senior executive leadership roles working with publicly traded consumer products companies provides him with a distinctive set of qualifications and skills to serve as a director.

Mr. Morgenfeld, 53, was most recently the Chief Financial Officer and Head of Business Operations of Pinterest, Inc. (PINS), a position he held from 2019 to 2023. From 2016 to 2019, he served as Chief Financial Officer of Pinterest, Inc. Before joining Pinterest, Mr. Morgenfeld served as Vice President of Finance at Twitter from 2015 to 2016 and Treasurer and Senior Vice President of Corporate Development and Corporate Financial Analytics for Hewlett-Packard Company from 2013 to 2015. Prior to his role at Hewlett-Packard, Mr. Morgenfeld was an investment partner at Silver Lake Partners from 2004 to 2013. Mr. Morgenfeld graduated first in his class from the United States Military Academy and also holds an MBA degree from Stanford University. Mr. Morgenfeld also serves on the board of directors of AppLovin Corporation, a public company delivering a software platform for mobile application developers to improve the marketing and monetization of their products. His significant finance and consumer internet experience provides valuable expertise to the Board of Directors.

Mr. Mulliken, 52, is currently a Senior Lecturer at Harvard Business School where he has taught in the Strategy Unit since September 2024. Until 2025, he served as a Senior Advisor with The Boston Consulting Group (“BCG”), a global management consulting firm where Mr. Mulliken served as a management consultant on topics of retail, consumer goods and technology, and a frequent advisor to high growth technology companies. Prior to re-joining BCG in 2020, Mr. Mulliken served on the executive team at Wayfair Inc. for a decade, as Chief Technology Officer and Senior Vice President of Strategic Initiatives. Mr. Mulliken founded and led several lifestyle brands including Joss & Main and Birch Lane. He also led the acquisition and integration of DwellStudio as well as the ground-up creation of a proprietary ad tech business and tech stack. Mr. Mulliken previously served as the Chief Integrated Product Officer at IndigoAg, an agricultural technology company. Mr. Mulliken also serves on the board at Bombas, a direct-to-consumer apparel company. Mr. Mulliken has a 25-year track record of

7

leading innovation and growth as an investor, technology executive and management consultant. Mr. Mulliken earned his undergraduate degree in Mathematics from Reed College and his MBA in Corporate Finance from London Business School. Mr. Mulliken’s decades of experience in ecommerce and multichannel retail as Chief Technology Officer and member of the executive team of a publicly traded company, as well as a strategy consultant and independent director, provides him valuable perspective as a director.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”

THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR.

8

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT URBAN OUTFITTERS

Governance Summary & Highlights

We are committed to corporate governance practices that promote long-term value creation, transparency and accountability to our shareholders. The Company and the Board of Directors engage with shareholders in an effort to ensure that management and the Board are focused on, and responsive to, investor priorities and concerns.

After extensive shareholder engagement efforts and evaluation of best practices over the past several years, the Board of Directors has adopted numerous governance changes, including:

In recent years, the Board of Directors has added multi-channel retail, financial, technology and consumer-sector expertise to the Board of Directors. If all director nominees are elected at the Annual Meeting, female Directors will make up 30% of the Board of Directors. For the eighth consecutive year, female Directors make up more than 25% of the Board of Directors. The Company will continue to seek new skills sets for the Board of Directors.

9

The matrix below provides summary information regarding the candidates for and current Board of Directors in an easy-to-read format.

Board of Directors

10

Board of Directors

Our business is managed under the direction of our Board of Directors in accordance with the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law of 1988 and our By-laws. Members of the Board of Directors are kept informed of our business through discussions with the Chairman of the Board of Directors (the “Chairman”), the Chief Financial Officer and other officers, by reviewing materials provided to them and by participating in regular and special meetings of the Board of Directors and its committees. In addition, to promote open discussion among our non-employee directors, those directors meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions without the participation of management or employee directors.

The foundation for our corporate governance is the Board of Directors’ policy that a majority of the members of the Board of Directors should be independent. We have reviewed internally and with our Board of Directors the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the related rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and current NASDAQ Marketplace Rules regarding corporate governance policies and procedures. Our corporate governance documents comply with all applicable requirements.

Currently, there are ten directors, eight of whom are non-employee directors. The Board of Directors has determined that none of the eight current non-employee directors have any relationship that, in the opinion of the Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director, and that each meets the objective requirement of “independence” under the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. Therefore, the Board of Directors has determined that each of these eight directors is an “independent” director under the standards currently set forth in the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. Neither Richard A. Hayne nor Margaret A. Hayne is independent. See also “—Audit Committee” below.

The Board of Directors currently combines the role of Chairman and the role of Chief Executive Officer. Richard A. Hayne currently serves in both of these positions. The Board of Directors believes this is the most efficient and effective leadership structure for the Company at this time. Mr. Hayne is the co-founder of the Company and has been its Chairman since the Company’s incorporation in 1976, and as such, the Board of Directors believes that he is uniquely qualified through his experience and expertise to set the agenda for, and lead discussions of, strategic issues for the Company at the board level. Mr. Hayne has been instrumental in the Company’s historical success and is in large part responsible for the Company’s substantial growth since its inception.

The Board of Directors believes that the Company’s corporate governance structure provides the appropriate balance between the need for consistent strategic direction and the need for objectivity and independence of the non-management directors and includes several effective oversight mechanisms. The Company’s corporate governance structure includes, but is not limited to, the following components: (i) the Board of Directors is comprised of a majority of independent directors; (ii) following most meetings of the Board of Directors, the independent directors meet in executive session without the Chairman present to review, among other things, his performance as Chief Executive Officer; and (iii) various committees of the Board of

11

Directors composed of only independent directors perform oversight functions independent of management, such as overseeing the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, senior executive compensation (including the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer) and the selection and evaluation of directors. Accordingly, the Board of Directors believes that requiring that the Chairman be a non-management director would weaken the Company’s leadership structure without providing any added benefit beyond that already achieved by its existing governance structure. The Board of Directors retains authority to modify this structure as it deems appropriate.

In order to enhance the Board of Directors’ active and objective oversight of our management, the Board of Directors annually elects one of its independent directors to serve in a lead capacity (the “Lead Director”). Edward N. Antoian has been elected by the Board of Directors to serve as the Lead Director since 2018. The duties of the Lead Director are to (i) preside at all meetings of the Board of Directors at which the Chairman is not present, including any executive sessions of the independent directors, (ii) call meetings of the independent directors, (iii) serve as the principal liaison between the Chairman and the independent directors, (iv) approve the frequency of meetings of the Board of Directors and meeting agendas and schedules, (v) be available, when appropriate and when the Chairman is not available, for consultation and direct communication with shareholders of the Company, and (vi) review the Lead Director Charter on an annual basis and recommend to the Board of Directors for approval any modifications or changes. A copy of the charter for the Lead Director is available on the Company’s corporate website, www.urbn.com.

During Fiscal 2025, the Board of Directors held four meetings. Each member of the Board of Directors attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and all committees on which he or she sits. All references in this Proxy Statement to our fiscal years refer to the fiscal years ended on January 31 in those years. For example, “Fiscal 2025” refers to the Company’s fiscal year ended January 31, 2025.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, a Compensation and Leadership Development Committee (“Compensation Committee”), and a Nominating Committee. The charters of these committees have been approved by our Board of Directors and are available on the Company’s corporate website at www.urbn.com.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee operates under a written charter that has been approved by the Board of Directors. The charter is reviewed annually by the Audit Committee with any recommended changes approved by the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee’s primary responsibility is to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities to our shareholders and other constituencies. In furtherance of those oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee’s primary duties are to:

12

13

The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is independent under the independence standards discussed above, and that each member meets the additional independence standards applicable under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related rules of the SEC and NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that each of the current directors serving on the Audit Committee, Wesley S. McDonald, Edward N. Antoian and Todd R. Morgenfeld, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” in accordance with the definition set forth in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K, as adopted by the SEC. In Fiscal 2025, the Audit Committee met eight times.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter that has been approved by the Board of Directors. The charter is reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee with any recommended changes approved by the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing our compensation strategy and for the oversight and administration of our compensation programs including our stock incentive plans. The Compensation Committee:

The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee is independent under the independence standards currently set forth in the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. For a discussion of the role of executive officers and compensation consultants in determining executive and director compensation, see “Compensation of Executive Officers—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Design of Compensation Program” and “—Operation and Process—Role of Executive Officers in Establishing Compensation.” In Fiscal 2025, the Compensation Committee met four times.

14

Nominating Committee

The Nominating Committee operates under a written charter that has been approved by the Board of Directors. The charter is reviewed annually by the Nominating Committee with any recommended changes approved by the Board of Directors. The Nominating Committee, in consultation with our Chairman:

The Nominating Committee also periodically reviews the Company’s corporate governance policies and practices and recommends to the Board of Directors any appropriate modifications. The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Nominating Committee is independent under the independence standards currently set forth in the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. In Fiscal 2025, the Nominating Committee met four times.

Director Nominations

The Nominating Committee recommends director nominees to the Board of Directors. The Nominating Committee seeks individuals with relevant experience from traditional corporate environments and other sources who are qualified to be directors based on the Nominating Committee’s judgment of the potential candidate’s experience, skills, and knowledge of business and management practices. If needed, the Nominating Committee will use a third-party search firm to assist in finding director candidates. The Nominating Committee considers diversity broadly, including differences of viewpoint, experience, skills, and individual characteristics, with the aim of creating a high-functioning Board with the varied perspectives, experience, and skills needed to oversee the Company’s business.

The nominees for election to the Board of Directors consist of individuals with several different areas of expertise, including physical and digital retail, creative and design, brand strategy, social media, finance and accounting, law, technology and consumer-sector experience.

The Nominating Committee will give appropriate consideration to qualified persons recommended by shareholders for nomination as directors and will evaluate such qualified persons in the same manner as other identified candidates, when submitted prior to the applicable shareholder proposal date referred to in the “Proposals for 2026 Annual Meeting” section of this Proxy Statement, provided such recommendations comply with the applicable

15

procedures in the Company’s By-laws, which are summarized in that section. Shareholders may submit director recommendations in writing to the Nominating Committee at Urban Outfitters, Inc., 5000 South Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19112-1495. Such recommendations must also include: (i) sufficient biographical information about the proposed nominee to permit the Nominating Committee to evaluate his or her qualifications and experience and (ii) the nominee’s consent to being named in the proxy statement and to serving as a director if elected.

Risk Management

The Board of Directors is actively involved in the oversight of risks that could affect the Company. This oversight is conducted primarily through the Audit Committee, but the full Board of Directors has retained responsibility for general oversight of risks. The Audit Committee considers and reviews the adequacy of the Company’s internal controls, including the processes for identifying significant risks or exposures, with management and the Company’s internal audit department and independent registered public accounting firm. Among other risks, the Audit Committee periodically reviews the Company’s data security and privacy policies, procedures, and risks. The Company’s Data Protection Officer reports to the Audit Committee at least quarterly and provides the Audit Committee updates regarding the Company’s data privacy environment. The Company’s Chief Information Security Officer reports to the Audit Committee at least annually regarding the Company’s data security environment. In addition, the full Board of Directors is involved in oversight and administration of risk and risk management practices by overseeing members of senior management in their risk management capacities, regularly reviewing and analyzing the Company’s investment portfolio and accompanying risk levels, and reviewing and analyzing inventory risk quarterly as part of the review of financial statements. Members of the Company’s senior management have day-to-day responsibility for risk management and establishing risk management practices, and report matters to the Audit Committee or the full Board of Directors as relevant and necessary. The Company’s senior management have an open line of communication to the Board of Directors and have the discretion to raise issues as needed in any manner they deem appropriate. In addition, the Company maintains an Impact Committee, co-chaired by URBN’s Chief Sourcing Officer and its Chief Administrative Officer. The Impact Committee maintains functional Working Groups that focus on three areas: Environmental & Social, Data Privacy & Security, and Governance. The Impact Committee reports to the Board of Directors at least annually.

In addition to the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee considers the risks that may be implicated with executive compensation, as discussed in “Compensation of Executive Officers—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Determination of Amount of Element; Relation of Elements to Primary Compensation Objectives—Setting Performance Criteria and Targets.”

16

Communications with Directors

Shareholders may communicate with members of the Company’s Board of Directors by writing, as applicable, to the full Board of Directors, a particular committee or a specific director at Urban Outfitters, Inc., 5000 South Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19112-1495. The Company’s telephone number is (215) 454-5500 and its fax number is (215) 454-4660.

Annual Meeting

Pursuant to Company policy, the directors are expected to attend the Company’s annual meetings of shareholders. All of the Company’s current directors attended last year’s annual meeting of shareholders.

Code of Conduct and Ethics

The Company has a written Code of Conduct that applies to all of the Company’s directors and employees, including its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. The Code of Conduct includes guidelines relating to compliance with laws, including anti-bribery and illegal payment laws, the ethical handling of actual or potential conflicts of interest, the use of corporate opportunities, the protection and use of the Company’s confidential information, the acceptance of gifts and business courtesies, accurate financial reporting, and procedures for promoting compliance with, and reporting violations of, the Code of Conduct. The Code of Conduct is available on the Company’s corporate website at www.urbn.com. The Company intends to post any amendments to the Code of Conduct and also to disclose any waivers (to the extent applicable to the Company’s executive officers and directors) on its website.

17

PROPOSAL 2. RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026

The Audit Committee has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting for Fiscal 2026 and to perform such other appropriate accounting services as may be approved by the Audit Committee. The Board of Directors proposes and recommends that shareholders ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for Fiscal 2026.

More information concerning the relationship of the Company with its independent registered public accounting firm appears above under the heading “Corporate Governance at Urban Outfitters—Audit Committee” and below under the headings “Relationships with Auditors” and “Audit Committee Report.”

If the shareholders do not ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will take such vote into account in considering the retention of Deloitte & Touche LLP.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL

YEAR 2026.

18

PROPOSAL 3. SHAREHOLDER ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are seeking a non-binding advisory vote from our shareholders to approve the compensation of our named executive officers, as set forth in this Proxy Statement. This vote is intended to provide an overall assessment of our executive compensation program rather than focus on any specific item of compensation. Based on an advisory vote at our 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, it is our current policy to hold an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers every year.

At the Company’s 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our shareholders approved, with approximately 99% of the votes cast, the compensation of our named executive officers. The Company welcomes our shareholders’ views on this subject, and our Board of Directors and Compensation Committee will carefully consider the outcome of this vote consistent with the best interests of all shareholders. As an advisory vote, however, the outcome is not binding on the Company, the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee.

As described in detail under the heading “Compensation of Executive Officers—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Company’s executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain, and motivate executive and key employee talent in support of its primary objective of building compelling brands that connect with the customer on an emotional level. Please read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for additional details about our executive compensation programs, including information about the Fiscal 2025 compensation of our named executive officers. Specifically, we are seeking a vote on the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related narrative discussion.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RESOLUTION ABOVE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

19

OTHER MATTERS

The Board of Directors knows of no matters to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting, other than those set forth herein and in the attached notice and customary procedural matters. If any other matters should properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof, the proxies solicited hereby will be voted on such matters, to the extent permitted by the rules and regulations of the SEC, in accordance with the judgment of the persons voting such proxies.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

FISCAL 2025

20

For a discussion of the methodology used to determine the fair value of awards in Fiscal 2025 and Fiscal 2024, please see the “Share-Based Compensation” note to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2025, which is included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on April 1, 2025.

Each non-employee director is paid two cash installments consisting of (i) a $50,000 payment in August, following the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders, and (ii) a $50,000 payment upon completion of the fiscal year.

During Fiscal 2025, the Company granted, on a discretionary basis, each non-employee director serving on June 5, 2024, 3,700 Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) under the 2017 Plan (as defined below). The grant date fair value of each RSU granted under the 2017 Plan was $41.12.

All directors and their immediate family members are eligible to receive discounts on our merchandise through use of discount cards issued to them and in accordance with our employee merchandise discount policy.

The Board of Directors believes it is good corporate practice to periodically review and re-evaluate the total compensation paid to the Company’s non-employee directors for their service on the Board of Directors, including the cash and equity components of that compensation. The Board of Directors intends to review the compensation paid to the non-employee directors following the Annual Meeting and will make any adjustments it deems appropriate.

21

COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Company Objectives

The Company’s compensation program is designed to attract, retain, and motivate executive and key employee talent in support of its primary objective of building compelling brands that connect with the customer on an emotional level. The Company believes that delivering value to the customer by excelling at “experiential retailing” is the foundation for the long-term maximization of shareholder value.

Design of Compensation Program

General

Our compensation program is designed to provide executives market competitive pay with the ability to earn rewards for maximizing shareholder value and growing our brands, both in the short-term and the long-term. We seek to establish balanced performance metrics that promote disciplined progress towards longer-term goals and that correlate to the revenue and profit objectives of, and appropriate risk to, the Company. The majority of our executive officers’ total compensation is comprised of a combination of performance-based cash compensation and equity-based awards, which derive their benefit from increases in shareholder value. This furthers our core compensation principle of providing pay for both individual and Company-wide performance. These long-standing compensation policies were designed and approved by management, the Compensation Committee and/or the Board of Directors, as appropriate. In addition, at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our shareholders approved our executive compensation program.

Long-Term Versus Currently Paid Out Compensation

Current compensation paid to executive officers includes base salaries, which are paid periodically throughout the fiscal year, and performance bonuses, which are paid after the close of the fiscal year. The Company’s long-term executive compensation is generally comprised of a combination of performance stock units and restricted stock units. The Company has long believed that equity-based compensation with extended vesting periods and, in the case of performance stock units, performance targets conditioned on achieving Company financial growth objectives, aligns executive and shareholder interests in maximizing long-term value. The Company believes that equity-based compensation awards made in Fiscal 2023, Fiscal 2024 and Fiscal 2025 share these characteristics and offer the potential for meaningful compensation for superior performance measured over an extended period of time.

Beginning February 1, 2013, the Company allowed certain employees, including the Company’s named executive officers, an opportunity to participate in the Urban Outfitters Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”). The Deferred

22

Compensation Plan is discussed more fully below in “Equity-Based Incentives—Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan.” As a matter of practice and philosophy, the Company has significantly limited the scope and value of perquisites provided to executive officers. None of the named executive officers currently participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan.

The Company’s compensation structure attempts to balance the ongoing cash requirements of the named executive officers for current income with the Company’s desire to create long-term incentives that are directly tied to growth in shareholder value. There is no pre-determined allocation between current and long-term compensation; the Compensation Committee maintains flexibility in this regard. The Committee has retained an independent compensation consultant and determined both the size and allocation of executive compensation in light of market benchmarks and comparators. Long-term equity compensation and short-term performance-based incentive compensation have provided the majority of income that named executive officers have derived from their employment with the Company. In recognition of this, the Compensation Committee may take the performance of the Common Shares (and therefore the perceived value of them to the executive) into consideration when making compensation decisions. Different positions may yield a different balance between cash and equity compensation in light of both market trends and Company objectives.

In the beginning of Fiscal 2009, citing his ownership of a substantial number of Common Shares and his confidence in the Company’s future performance, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Richard A. Hayne, requested that his base salary be set at $1.00 per year, and the Compensation Committee continues to honor his request. For Fiscal 2025, Mr. Hayne remained eligible to receive a performance bonus, which was tied to revenue and profitability metrics.

Operation and Process

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee sets the amount of each element of compensation for each named executive officer, as described herein and under “Corporate Governance at Urban Outfitters—Compensation Committee.” The Compensation Committee generally holds meetings at least four times a year, and compensation amounts for executive officers for the new fiscal year are generally set in the Company’s first fiscal quarter. In Fiscal 2025, there were four meetings of the Compensation Committee.

The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of four members, Todd R. Morgenfeld (who is the Compensation Committee’s chairman), Kelly Campbell, Amin N. Maredia, and Wesley S. McDonald, all of whom are “independent” directors as defined by the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. The Compensation Committee charter is available on the Company’s corporate website at www.urbn.com. The Compensation Committee reviews the charter on an annual basis and revises it as warranted.

23

Compensation Committee Consultant

Korn Ferry Hay Group (“Korn Ferry”) has served as a compensation consultant to the Compensation Committee since February 2018, providing advice on executive compensation matters. The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors have discretion to appoint and terminate the consultant, as described in the Compensation Committee’s charter. The Compensation Committee determines the scope of the consultant’s review. The compensation consultant typically provides benchmarking data for each individual executive against the Company’s designated peer group, as well as more general recommendations regarding the Company’s compensation structure. Korn Ferry sends its invoices for the compensation consultant’s services directly to the Compensation Committee, which reviews the invoices and then forwards them to the Company for payment. During Fiscal 2025, the Company paid $45,600 to Korn Ferry for services rendered.

Role of Executive Officers in Establishing Compensation

The Compensation Committee is solely responsible for compensation determinations and compensation policies applicable to executive officers, as well as other matters provided in the Compensation Committee charter. Neither the Company’s Chief Executive Officer nor any other executive officer makes any such determinations or sets any such policies. The Compensation Committee does consult with the Chief Executive Officer in determining compensation levels for each other named executive officer, and the Compensation Committee takes his assessment of the performance of such named executive officers into consideration when weighing the factors and setting compensation. The Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Administrative Officer and other executive officers may attend portions of certain meetings of the Compensation Committee as needed.

Neither the Chief Executive Officer nor any other officer has the authority to call Compensation Committee meetings or set meeting agendas themselves, nor do they meet with the compensation consultant on an individual basis without the consent of the Compensation Committee or its chairman.

The Chief Executive Officer has the primary role in making recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding the assessment and design of programs, plans, and awards. He is assisted by the Chief Operating Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and the Chief Administrative Officer who provide him with information and input on these items.

Elements of Compensation

The Company’s compensation program is comprised of three main elements: (1) base salary, (2) performance bonus, and (3) equity-based incentives, including, performance stock units, and restricted stock units.

The Board of Directors has evaluated the Company’s overall compensation policies and practices for its employees to determine whether such policies and practices create incentives

24

that can affect the Company’s risk and management of that risk and has further assessed whether any risks arising from these policies and practices are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. In doing so, the Board of Directors considered, among other factors, the distribution of risk among the Company’s brands and segments, the overall mixture of compensation elements used to incentivize employees, and the Company’s use of balanced performance metrics that promote disciplined progress towards longer-term goals. Based on its evaluation, the Board of Directors has concluded that the risks arising from the Company’s overall compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Selection of Elements

The Compensation Committee has chosen to utilize base salary, performance bonus, and equity-based incentives because it believes such a compensation package, taken as a whole, is both competitive in the marketplace and directly reflects the Company’s primary objective of maximizing shareholder value and growing its brands. The rationale for the selection of each particular element is discussed in detail below.

Determination of Amount of Element; Relation of Elements to Primary Compensation Objectives

In making compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee reviews the target amounts payable to each executive under each individual element of compensation, as well as the aggregate amount of actual and potential compensation to each executive.

Base Salaries

The Compensation Committee determines annual salary based on position, experience, and competitive market factors for comparable talent. The Company generally seeks to set salaries at or near prevailing market rates for comparable positions in specialty retail to attract and retain top talent, which is a key to growing long-term shareholder value.

Performance Bonuses

The Company’s executive officers are typically eligible to receive cash incentive bonuses based on the achievement of specific performance targets established in advance under the Urban Outfitters Executive Incentive Plan (as amended, the “Incentive Plan”). In determining performance objectives, the Compensation Committee sets forth specific targets that are consistent with its primary objectives. We believe that this presents the executive with clear objectives that, if achieved, will maximize shareholder value and further the growth of our brands while providing commensurate rewards to the executive.

For Fiscal 2025, the Compensation Committee set the performance criteria for each of our named executive officers in the first fiscal quarter. Eligibility for performance bonuses, the methodology for setting the performance criteria and targets, the role of executive officers in determining performance factors, and the methodology for measuring achievement at the end of the fiscal year are all described below.

25

Eligibility

The Compensation Committee determines executive officer eligibility for performance bonuses during the Company’s first fiscal quarter based on the Company’s financial budgets and operating plans and the roles that the executives have in achieving those objectives.

Setting Performance Criteria and Targets

Each year, the Compensation Committee sets the performance criteria, targets, and payouts for each participant during the Company’s first fiscal quarter in light of the Company’s growth strategy, major initiatives, and current and projected operations and objectives. The criteria may be based on the performance of the participant, a division, the Company as a whole, or a subsidiary of the Company, at the Compensation Committee’s discretion. The Compensation Committee determines performance criteria that are appropriate for each participant. The Compensation Committee may also take into account the opinion of the named executive officer as to which criteria he or she feels is the best indicator of his or her performance. After a reasonable evaluation, the Compensation Committee concluded that while the criteria or targets for Fiscal 2025 reward prudent risk-taking in support of the Company’s objectives, they do not encourage or promote inappropriate risk-taking by the participants.

For Fiscal 2025, the Compensation Committee set a “Target” percentage of Base Salary for each executive. For each executive other than the CEO, 75% of the Performance Bonus is based on achievement of Company or brand financial goals (“Financial Goals”) and 25% is based on individual goals for achievement of Company strategic efforts (“Personal Goals”). The Financial Goals of named executives without merchant responsibilities are based on achieving URBN Net Sales and Operating Income targets. The Financial Goals of Brand CEOs are based on achieving brand Net Sales and Operating Income targets. The Compensation Committee set Threshold, Target, and Max levels of performance for each Financial Goal. At “Target” level, the executive receives 100% of their Target Financial bonus, at “Threshold” they receive 50% of Target Financial bonus, and at “Max” they receive 200% of Target Financial bonus. For achievement between Threshold and Target, or Target and Max, the payout is linearly interpolated. The Compensation Committee selected strategic Personal Goals for each executive. The performance targets and achievement for the Company’s named executive officers for Fiscal 2025 are described below in “—Measuring Achievement: Payment of Bonuses.”

Role of Executive Officers in Determining Performance Factors

The Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, and the Chief Administrative Officer make recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding the performance bonus targets and goals of all named executive officers. The Compensation Committee considers these recommendations when setting the performance bonus plans.

Measuring Achievement: Payment of Bonuses

After the end of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee determines each executive’s achievement of the pre-established performance targets and goals. The Compensation

26

Committee has discretion to exclude the positive and/or negative results of material events that it does not believe should affect the calculation of the achievement of performance goals, such as impairment of assets and goodwill, legal judgments and settlements, foreign currency exchange rates, force majeure events, major corporate events such as acquisitions, divestitures and restructuring, material changes in laws and regulations, cost of approved corporate initiatives, and other matters that management may recommend to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee applies the level of achievement to a schedule to determine each individual’s adjusted performance bonus percentage, which is then multiplied by the individual’s target award. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to award that amount or adjust the award payable if it believes such action would be in the best interest of the Company.

Set forth in the tables below are the performance targets and the percentage of performance bonus subject to each performance objective for Fiscal 2025 for (i) the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, (ii) the Chief Financial Officer, (iii) the Co-President and Chief Creative Officer, (iv) the Co-President and Chief Operating Officer, and (v) the Global Chief Executive Officer of Urban Outfitters Group and Free People Group.

As described above, for Fiscal 2025, either a portion or all of each named executive officer’s bonus was tied to achievement of Net Sales and Operating Income measures. URBN Net Sales of $5.551 billion and adjusted Operating Income of $478 million were between “Target” and “Max” performance. As a result, bonuses tied to URBN Net Sales and Operating Profit were paid at 168% and 160% of Target bonus, respectively. URBN adjusted operating income excludes the impact of store impairment and lease abandonment charges.

Free People adjusted Net Sales of $1.456 billion was above “Max” performance and adjusted Free People Operating Income of $238 million was between “Target” and “Max” performance. Accordingly, bonuses based on Free People Net Sales and Operating Income were paid at 200% and 183% of Target bonus, respectively. Free People adjusted net sales excludes from net sales the impact of gift card breakage. Free People adjusted operating income excludes the impact of gift card breakage.

Urban Outfitters brand adjusted Net Sales of $1.246 billion and adjusted Operating Loss of ($82) million were below Threshold. As a result, bonuses based on Urban Outfitters brand performance were not paid. Urban Outfitters adjusted net sales excludes from net sales the impact of gift card breakage. Urban Outfitters adjusted operating income excludes the impact of store impairment and lease abandonment charges and gift card breakage.

Richard A. Hayne – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

27

Melanie Marein-Efron – Chief Financial Officer

Francis J. Conforti – Co-President and Chief Operating Officer

Margaret Hayne – Co-President & Chief Creative Officer

28

Sheila B. Harrington – Global Chief Executive Officer, Urban Outfitters Group & Free People Group

In the future, if the Company were to change the financial budgets or goals upon which the performance targets and awards were based for a particular fiscal year, the Compensation Committee would have discretion to adjust bonus awards accordingly where it believes it is warranted in light of the objectives of the compensation program. With respect to Covered Employees, however, such adjustments may only be made to lower the compensation that would otherwise be receivable.

Equity-Based Incentives

The Compensation Committee believes that stock ownership by management and equity-based performance compensation arrangements are useful tools to align the interests of management with those of the Company’s shareholders. Where executives are shareholders themselves, the executives will realize a direct benefit by maximizing shareholder value. In addition, as shareholders, executives will benefit from successful growth of the Company’s brands to the extent that this will increase the value of their shareholdings. Accordingly, the

29

Company’s executives are eligible to receive stock appreciation rights, performance stock units, restricted stock units, restricted stock, and stock options under the Company’s stock incentive plans, which have been approved by the Company’s shareholders. The Company may grant awards under the Urban Outfitters 2017 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”) and certain awards under the Urban Outfitters 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2008 Plan”). While some awards are still outstanding under the 2008 Plan, all awards granted in Fiscal 2025 were under the 2017 Plan.

The Compensation Committee determines whether to grant equity awards, the type of award, and the size of the grant to each executive officer based upon its overall assessment. The Compensation Committee evaluates the executive officer’s performance after taking into consideration prior years’ grants, the organizational impact of the executive officer, and the need to respond to competitive conditions in order retain executive officers and attract new candidates.

Performance Stock Units and Restricted Stock Units

Performance stock unit (“PSU”) awards and restricted stock unit (“RSU”) awards are forms of equity-based incentives available to the Compensation Committee under the 2017 Plan. RSU awards are purely time-vesting awards.

As discussed above, under “—Design of Compensation Program—Long-Term Versus Currently Paid Out Compensation,” the Company believes that the PSU awards made in Fiscal 2025 offer the potential for meaningful compensation for superior performance measured over an extended period of time. Vesting is both time-based and performance-based; the awards will not vest until the date specified in the award agreement and, consistent with our core principle of providing pay for performance, are forfeited if the established performance criteria are not achieved. The Compensation Committee considers the PSU awards granted in Fiscal 2025 to be an integral component of the named executive officers’ overall compensation.

In Fiscal 2025, the Company made grants of PSUs and RSUs to named executive officers. On March 13, 2024, the Company granted each of Margaret Hayne, Co-President and Chief Creative Officer, Francis J. Conforti, Co-President and Chief Operating Officer URBN, Sheila B. Harrington, Global Chief Executive Officer of the Urban Outfitters and Free People Brands, equity with an approximate grant date valuation of $1,650,000 split equally between RSUs and PSUs. On March 13, 2024, the Company granted Melanie Marein-Efron, Chief Financial Officer of URBN, equity with a grant date valuation of $850,000 split equally between RSUs and PSUs. In each case, these awards were translated into units at the closing price of URBN on March 13, 2024 and rounded to the nearest share. The RSUs vest in equal installments on March 11, 2026, March 10, 2027, and March 8, 2028. The PSUs vest in equal installments on March 11, 2026, March 10, 2027, and March 8, 2028 provided in each case that URBN’s operating profit margin for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2026, 2027, and 2028 respectively equals or exceeds 5%.

30

At its discretion, the Compensation Committee may also award bonuses to employees, including named executive officers, for individual achievement or outstanding performance, to motivate for achievement of specific Company or individual goals and/or to promote retention and loyalty to the Company.

Potential Payments Upon Changes in Control; Certain Corporate Transactions

The 2017 Plan provides that upon a change in control, all remaining unvested options and restricted stock awards will immediately vest and become exercisable, as applicable. The 2017 Plan, however, provides the Compensation Committee with the flexibility to specify the change in control provisions in the award agreement. In Fiscal 2022, the Compensation Committee directed management to amend the grant instruments for the 2017 Stock Plan to include a “double-trigger” change of control provision. In Fiscal 2025, all award agreements granted to key executives were under the 2017 Plan and included a “double-trigger” provision that vesting would accelerate upon a “change in control” of the Company if the employee is terminated without good cause or resigns for good reason. “Change in control” was defined to include an event in which any person or group acquires majority beneficial ownership of the Company, other than Richard A. Hayne or benefit plans sponsored by either the Company or its subsidiaries. In deciding whether to exclude the change in control provisions in the grants, the Compensation Committee considers various factors, such as consistency with previous Company plans, industry practice, competition in the marketplace and effects on retention.

In the event of certain corporate transactions (such as a merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock, separation, reorganization or liquidation), the Compensation Committee has discretion to terminate all or a portion of outstanding options and stock appreciation rights, effective as of the closing of the corporate transaction, if it determines that such termination is in the best interests of the Company. If the Compensation Committee decides to terminate, the holder will have the right to exercise outstanding options and stock appreciation rights on at least seven days’ notice. The Compensation Committee selected these corporate transactions as a triggering event for potential termination because they believe they are customary in industry practice.

Benchmarking

In August 2024, Korn Ferry, the Company’s compensation consultant, reviewed publicly available information regarding the compensation paid to named executive officers of specialty retailers similar in operations and revenue to the Company and made a presentation to the Compensation Committee regarding this analysis. The retailers reviewed were PVH Corp, Ralph Lauren Corp, Williams-Sonoma, Under Armour, Capri Holdings (Michael Kors), Tapestry, American Eagle Outfitters, Abercrombie & Fitch, Carter’s, Genesco, Columbia Sportswear, G-III Apparel Group, Lululemon Athletica, Guess, Victoria’s Secret & Co., and Levi Strauss & Co. The Compensation Committee reviewed the figures provided by the consultant, which provided the group’s median and the 25^th and 75^th percentiles for informational and overall comparison purposes. The Compensation Committee also directed management to prepare

32

benchmarking information from the publicly filed information of the Peer Group and other companies for the Compensation Committee’s use and review. Although the Compensation Committee considered the comparative data provided, there is no target percentile or precise position in which the Compensation Committee aims to set compensation other than to generally be competitive in the marketplace.

The 2024 Korn Ferry analysis also provided benchmarking information for certain executives who are not named executive officers. In addition, from time to time, management provides the Compensation Committee with benchmarking data related to executives and managers who are not named executive officers.

If the Compensation Committee elects to analyze comparative data, there may be a variation in the companies reviewed for comparative purposes from year-to-year depending on what information becomes most relevant to the Compensation Committee, although the Compensation Committee anticipates referring to information available for publicly traded specialty retailers for the foreseeable future.

The Compensation Committee takes the Company’s own historical data into consideration to ensure that compensation increases are consistent with the growth in Operating Income and in responsibility of its executives. Each year, the Compensation Committee reviews a summary of all of the Company’s named executive officer and key management personnel compensation for the previous fiscal year as well as prior fiscal years. All historical data is viewed with the operating results and responsibilities of management personnel and their specific performance.

Compensation Committee Discretion

The factors related to increasing the compensation and potential compensation from bonuses of named executive officers from year-to-year take into account increased revenue and profitability, market comparative data, performance, and measurably increased responsibilities, with a focus on both performance and the leveraging of selling, general and administrative expenses. The Company has not generally decreased base salaries or the bonus potential of named executive officers. This is because its history of growth has led to larger responsibilities for its named executive officers and because as a matter of philosophy, it does not generally reduce these compensation elements for existing employees. As more fully described above, however, at Richard A. Hayne’s request, the Compensation Committee set his base salary at $1.00 in Fiscal 2009, which has remained in effect since that time and continued in effect for Fiscal 2025.

Under the Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee has discretion in the granting of performance bonus awards and can grant such awards to executive officers who are not Covered Employees at its discretion, even if specified performance goals are not achieved. In future fiscal years, the requirements for performance bonus awards could be waived to reward specific performance achievements in an instance where the actual criteria for a performance bonus were not met or for purposes of retention. The Compensation Committee may reduce any executive

33

officer’s award if it believes such action would be in the best interest of the Company. At the end of a fiscal year, the Compensation Committee also has the ability to grant cash bonuses to any executive officer on a discretionary basis, as described above in “—Additional Types of Compensation.”

Pursuant to the Plans, the Compensation Committee has discretion to accelerate the date on which options or stock appreciation rights may be exercised and may accelerate the date of termination of the restrictions applicable to restricted stock and restricted stock units if it determines that to do either would be in the best interests of the Company and the plan participants.

Employment Agreements with Named Executive Officers

The Company at present has no employment agreements or contracts with its currently serving named executive officers and has no policies for post-termination compensation arrangements. In the future, the Company may, in its sole discretion, decide to provide some form of severance to other named executive officers in the event that any named executive officer’s employment ceases.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

The applicability of Section 162(m) of the Code may affect the tax deductibility of certain portions of named executive officers’ compensation. The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminated the exception under Section 162(m) of the Code for performance-based compensation and commissions, such that all compensation over one million dollars would be nondeductible. Where possible, the Company will structure compensation for its executive officers in a way that preserves tax deductibility under Section 162(m).

The Company does not usually consider the tax consequences to named executive officers of cash compensation or of equity-based compensation, though it considers the tax treatment to the Company for non-qualified options and the non-qualifying disposition of qualified options to be favorable.

Security Ownership Guidelines

In Fiscal 2022, the Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board of Directors adopted stock holding requirements for the Company’s directors and executive officers. Under this policy, non-employee directors, the CEO, and other executive officers are required to hold the lesser of a specified number of Common Shares or “URBN Equity” with an aggregate value equal to a specified multiple of their annual cash compensation or base salaries. Individuals covered by the policy have five years from the date they become covered by the policy to comply. After the five-year period, individuals who are not compliant must hold at least 50% of the net, after-tax Common Shares acquired under the Company’s stock plan and may not sell certain other owned Common Shares until the ownership requirement is met.

34

In addition, the Code of Conduct prohibits the directors and executive officers of the Company, other Company employees who have been granted options to purchase Company securities or who have received awards of equity-based securities, all Company employees who report directly to the Chief Executive Officer, and all employees in the Company’s Finance Department at the director level or above from trading any options on Company securities, maintaining a short position in Company securities, or engaging in certain hedging or monetization transactions, including through the use of financial instruments such as prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, or zero cost collars related to the Company’s Common Shares.

35

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The following report is not deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to the SEC’s proxy rules or the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the report shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any prior or subsequent filing by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.

The Compensation and Leadership Development Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Committee”) has submitted the following report for inclusion in this Proxy Statement:

Our Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement with management. Based on our Committee’s review of and the discussions with management with respect to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, our Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2025 for filing with the SEC.

The foregoing report is provided by the following directors, who constitute the Committee:

Todd R. Morgenfeld, Chairman of the Compensation and Leadership Development Committee

Kelly Campbell

Amin N. Maredia

Wesley S. McDonald

37

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

38

39

FISCAL 2025 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

40

41

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2025 FISCAL YEAR-END

42

43

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED DURING FISCAL 2025

44

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table shows the status of equity awards under the Plans as of January 31, 2025:

45

CEO PAY RATIO

SEC rules require us to disclose the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO, Richard A. Hayne, to the annual total compensation of our median employee (the “CEO Pay Ratio”). For Fiscal 2025, our median employee’s annual total compensation was $21,778. As set forth in the Summary Compensation Table, Mr. Hayne’s annual total compensation for Fiscal 2025 was $1,041,140. Accordingly, the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Hayne to our median employee was 48:1.

In calculating the CEO Pay Ratio, we first identified all employees as of November 1, 2024. Including all full-time, part-time, seasonal and temporary employees, as required by SEC rules, we had 24,072 U.S. and 3,124 non-U.S. employees on that date. In accordance with SEC rules, we excluded all employees in the 14 countries with our smallest employee populations, totaling in the aggregate 923 employees (approximately 3.30% of our total employee population on November 1, 2024). The table below sets forth the number of excluded employees by country.

To identify our median employee, we used total taxable compensation for calendar year 2024 and annualized the compensation of all permanent employees who worked for us for less than the full calendar year. We then calculated Fiscal 2025 compensation for the median employee using the same methodology we use for our named executive officers as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table.

Pay ratios that are reported by our peers may not be directly comparable to ours because of differences in the composition of each company’s workforce, as well as the assumptions and methodologies used in calculating the pay ratio, as permitted by SEC rules.

46

47

PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT OWNERSHIP

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Common Shares for each person known to the Company, other than Richard A. Hayne, Margaret A. Hayne and Harry S. Cherken, Jr., who beneficially owns more than five percent of the Company’s outstanding Common Shares, the name and address of such beneficial owner and the percentage such shares comprise of the outstanding Common Shares. All percentages are calculated based on 92,809,665 shares outstanding as of March 11, 2025.

54

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Common Shares for each current director, director nominee and named executive officer for Fiscal 2025 and all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. The number of shares beneficially owned is as of March 11, 2025, and all percentages are calculated based on 92,809,665 shares outstanding as of March 11, 2025. The address of each of the beneficial owners identified is 5000 South Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19112-1495.

55

56

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company’s executive officers, directors and 10% shareholders to file reports of ownership and changes of ownership of the Company’s common shares with the SEC. Based on a review of copies of these reports filed with the SEC and written representations from executive officers and directors, all filing requirements were met during Fiscal 2025, such that there were no delinquent reports in Fiscal 2025.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

The Compensation Committee currently consists of Mr. Morgenfeld, Ms. Campbell, Mr. Maredia and Mr. McDonald. No member of the Compensation Committee who served on the Compensation Committee at any time during Fiscal 2025 is or was during Fiscal 2025 an employee, or is or ever has been an officer, of the Company or its subsidiaries. No executive officer of the Company served as a director or a member of the compensation committee of another company, one of whose executive officers serves as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.

CERTAIN BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS

Richard A. Hayne, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, and Margaret A. Hayne, Co-President and Chief Creative Officer of Urban Outfitters, Inc., are married. Mr. Hayne’s son, David A. Hayne, is employed by the Company as the Chief Technology Officer and President of Nuuly, and his total compensation in Fiscal 2025 was $3,014,870 including salary, bonus, equity awards and 401(k) Company contributions. Mr. Hayne’s daughter-in-law, Samantha Hayne, is also employed by the Company as a Senior Concept Designer for the Free People brand, and her total compensation in Fiscal 2025 was $183,771 including salary, bonus, equity awards and 401(k) Company contributions.

John C. Mulliken, a director of the Company, serves on the board of Bombas, which supplied apparel to the Company in Fiscal 2025 and is expected to continue to do so in the future. The amount paid to Bombas in Fiscal 2025 was financially immaterial to Bombas and is unrelated to Mr. Mulliken’s compensation as director of Bombas. Mr. Mulliken was not involved in the sourcing of Bombas as a supplier to the Company, and he does not intend to be involved in the Company’s procurement of its products in the future. The Board of Directors considered these matters in determining Mr. Mulliken’s independence.

Pursuant to the terms of the Code of Conduct, which applies to all of the Company’s directors, officers and employees, conflicts of interest are prohibited unless approved by the Board of Directors or allowed under guidelines approved by the Board of Directors. Under the Code of Conduct, a conflict of interest can arise whenever a person’s private interests interfere in any way with the interests of the Company, including when a director, officer or employee takes

57

actions or has interests that make it difficult for such person to perform his or her work objectively and effectively, or when a director, officer or employee or a member of such person’s family receives potentially improper personal benefits. Each of the relationships described above has been reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors.

RELATIONSHIPS WITH AUDITORS

In May 2005, the Audit Committee approved the engagement of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and has re-approved the engagement in each subsequent year. Deloitte & Touche LLP has performed audit services, including the issuance of their audit opinion for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023.

One or more representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement as he or she may desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

58

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The following report is not deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to the SEC’s proxy rules or the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the report shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any prior or subsequent filing by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.

During Fiscal 2025, the Audit Committee was composed of three independent directors of the Company (as independence is defined under NASDAQ’s Marketplace Rules and the rules and regulations of the SEC). In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that during Fiscal 2025, all three current members of the Audit Committee, Wesley S. McDonald, Edward N. Antoian and Todd R. Morgenfeld, qualified as “audit committee financial experts” as defined by the SEC in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Its purpose is to monitor the integrity of the financial statements, review the Company’s internal accounting procedures and controls, oversee the independence, qualification and performance of the Company’s independent accountants and appoint the independent accountants. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the system of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed the audited financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2025 with management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

The Audit Committee reviewed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, who is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, its judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company’s accounting principles and discussed with the independent accountants such other matters as are required under Auditing Standard No. 1301 and other generally accepted auditing standards. In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with the independent accountants the accountants’ independence from management and the Company, including the matters in the written disclosures and the letter received by the Audit Committee, as required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and considered the compatibility of nonaudit services with the accountants’ independence.

The Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s independent accountants the overall scope and plans for the audit. The Audit Committee met with the independent accountants, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examination, their evaluation of the Company’s internal controls and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

59

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2025 for filing with the SEC.

Wesley S. McDonald, Chairman of the Audit Committee

Edward N. Antoian

Todd R. Morgenfeld

60

AUDIT AND OTHER FEES

Audit and Other Fees for Past Two Fiscal Years

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to the Company for services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and their respective affiliates (collectively, “Deloitte & Touche”) for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2025, and 2024.

Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee has a pre-approval policy pursuant to which it has granted its approval for Deloitte & Touche, as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, to perform certain audit, audit-related, tax and other services up to specified aggregate fee levels for each service. The Audit Committee periodically reviews and revises, if necessary, the list of pre-approved services that Deloitte & Touche may provide. The Audit Committee’s policy also provides that any proposed services that are not specifically pre-approved pursuant to the policy, as well as any proposed services that exceed pre-approved cost levels established in the policy, will require the Audit Committee’s separate pre-approval. In addition, the Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members, who must report, for information purposes only, any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee pre-approved all audit, audit-related and tax services provided by Deloitte & Touche during Fiscal 2025 in accordance with this policy.

PROPOSALS FOR 2026 ANNUAL MEETING

Shareholder Proposals for Inclusion in 2026 Proxy Statement. To be eligible for inclusion in the proxy statement for the 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, shareholder proposals must comply with applicable SEC rules and regulations and must be received by the Secretary of the

61

Company prior to December 2, 2025. If notification of a shareholder proposal is not received by December 2, 2025, the Company may vote, in its discretion, any and all of the proxies received in its solicitation against such proposal.

Shareholder Director Nominations for Inclusion in 2026 Proxy Statement. In December 2016, the Board of Directors amended the Company’s By-laws to implement “proxy access,” a means for the Company’s eligible shareholders to include shareholder-nominated director candidates in the Company’s proxy materials for annual meetings of shareholders. Section 1.10 was added to the By-laws to allow a shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders, owning at least 3% of the number of outstanding Common Shares continuously for at least three years, to include in the Company’s proxy materials for an annual meeting of shareholders a number of director nominees up to the greater of two or 25% of the Board of Directors, provided that the shareholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified therein. Pursuant to Section 1.10 of the By-laws, written notice of shareholder nominations to the Board of Directors that are to be included in the Proxy Statement must be delivered to the Secretary of the Company not later than 120 nor earlier than 150 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. Accordingly, any eligible shareholder who wishes to have a nomination considered at the 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and included in the Company’s proxy statement must deliver a written notice (containing the information specified in the By-laws regarding the shareholder and the proposed nominee) to the Secretary of the Company between January 5, 2026, and February 4, 2026.

Shareholder Director Nomination and Other Shareholder Proposals for Presentation at the 2026 Annual Meeting Not Included in 2026 Proxy Statement. Under our By-laws, written notice of shareholder nominations to the Board of Directors or any other business proposed by a shareholder that is not to be included in the proxy statement must be delivered to the Company’s Secretary not less than 70 nor more than 90 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. Accordingly, any shareholder who wishes to have a nomination or other business considered at the 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders but not included in the Company’s proxy statement must deliver a written notice (containing the information specified in the By-laws) to the Secretary of the Company between March 6, 2026, and March 26, 2026.

Notice of Solicitation of Proxies in Support of Nominees other than the Company’s Nominees. Notice of a solicitation of proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees for the 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be postmarked or delivered electronically to the Secretary of the Company no later than April 5, 2026.