16 February
2024
SolGold plc
("SolGold" or the
"Company")
Announces Successful
Completion of New Cascabel Pre-Feasibility Study with Significantly
Reduced Initial Capital Cost and 24% Internal Rate of
Return
· $5.4bn pre-tax Net Present Value ("NPV8%") and
33% internal rate of return ("IRR")
· $3.2bn after-tax NPV8%, 24% IRR and 4-year
payback period from the start of processing[1]
· Average production[2] of 123ktpa of
copper, 277kozpa of gold and 794kozpa of silver - 182ktpa copper
equivalent ("CuEq")[3] - with peak[4] copper production of 216ktpa (370ktpa
CuEq)
· Pre-production capital of $1.55bn for the initial
mine development, first process plant module and
infrastructure
· 85% of
Mineral Reserves are classified as Proven in updated Mineral
Reserve Estimate
· Initial 28-year mine plan of 540Mt containing 3.2Mt Cu @
0.60%, 9.4Moz Au @ 0.54 g/t and 28Moz Ag @ 1.62 g/t based on the
updated Mineral Reserve Estimate[5]
· The
Project economics have been calculated based on the economic terms
and conditions previously negotiated with the Ecuadorian
Government[6]
SolGold (LSE & TSX: SOLG) is
pleased to announce the successful completion of a new
Pre-Feasibility Study ("PFS" or "Study"), prepared in accordance
with National Instrument 43-101 ("NI 43-101") that supports a
Phased Block Cave Mine at its flagship Cascabel Project ("Cascabel"
or "Project") in Ecuador. Cascabel is 100%-owned through SolGold's
Ecuadorian subsidiary Exploraciones Novomining S.A. ("ENSA").
All dollar amounts are quoted in US Dollars.
Key Highlights of the
Pre-Feasibility Study
· Excellent economic viability of a Cascabel Phased Approach
Block Cave Mine
· +$1bn
initial capital expenditure savings compared to previous estimates,
reflecting efficient project development strategies, lower
technical risk attributed to the phased strategy
· Potential for accelerated cash flow and project
development
· The
current Cascabel mine plan reflects the profitable exploitation of
only 18% of the Alpala measured and indicated mineral resource
through a 28-year mine life - the size of the entire resource
indicates the mine's potential to be a multi-generational mining
asset
· Strong
commitment to responsible and sustainable mining practices,
including the use of renewable energy (hydropower) and an
environmentally conscious Project footprint reduction
Scott Caldwell, SolGold's CEO and
President of SolGold Ecuador, commented:
"Cascabel is not just a
mining project; it's a promise of responsible mining, lasting value
for all stakeholders and a sustainable legacy for the planet. With
reduced capital needs and lower risk compared to previous
approaches, together with our ongoing commitment to sustainability
and responsible mining, Cascabel is more than copper and gold; it's
a story of innovation, collaboration and a vision for a greener and
more prosperous tomorrow for the people of Ecuador. This Study was
conducted with the best outcomes for all our stakeholders in
mind."
Summary of Cascabel PFS
Results
Table 1: Economic and Operating
Summary
Key PFS Outcomes
(US$)
|
Base Case
|
Economic Assumptions
|
Copper ($/lb)
|
$3.85
|
Gold ($/oz)
|
$1,750
|
Silver ($/oz)
|
$22.50
|
Operating Parameters
|
Throughput
|
Phase 1:
12Mtpa; Phase 2: 24Mtpa
|
Initial Project LOM
|
28
years
|
Total Ore Mined
|
540
Mt
|
Average Copper Grade /
Recovery
|
0.60% |
88.7%
|
Average Gold Grade /
Recovery
|
0.54 g/t
| 72.9%
|
Average Silver Grade /
Recovery
|
1.62 g/t
| 65.7%
|
Production
|
Total CuEq Produced
|
4.3
Mt
|
Total Copper Produced
|
2.9
Mt
|
Total Gold Produced
|
6.9
Moz
|
Total Silver Produced
|
18.4
Moz
|
Annual CuEq Production
(peak/average)
|
370 kt |
182 kt
|
Annual Copper Production
(peak/average)
|
216 kt |
123 kt
|
Annual Gold Production
(peak/average)
|
734 koz |
277 koz
|
Annual Silver Production
(peak/average)
|
1,159 koz
| 794 koz
|
Capital
|
Pre-production
|
$1.55bn
|
Post-production
|
$2.57bn
|
Operating Costs
($/t processed)
|
Mining Costs
|
$6.2
|
Processing Costs
|
$7.4
|
G&A Costs
|
$1.0
|
Tailings, Port and Infrastructure
Costs
|
$0.7
|
Total Operating Costs
|
$15.3
|
Cash Costs
|
LOM Average Net Cash Cost ($/lb
Cu)
|
$0.25
|
LOM Average AISC ($/lb
Cu)
|
$0.69
|
Financials
|
Pre-tax NPV8% /
IRR
|
$5.4bn |
33%
|
|
After-tax NPV8% /
IRR
|
$3.2bn |
24%
|
|
Capital payback period
|
4
years
|
|
Average Annual Free Cash
Flow
(first 5 years of
production)
|
$449m
|
|
First 10-Years Free Cash Flow
Generation
|
$7.1bn
|
Reduced Initial Capital
Expenditure
Compared to previously considered
development scenarios, the Phased Approach Block Cave Mine has
substantially reduced the initial capital expenditure required to
develop Cascabel. This approach optimizes project development by
gradually scaling up operations, effectively managing costs and
minimizing financial risk.
After a ramp-up period of
approximately two years, the initial block cave will achieve a
production rate of 12 million tonnes per annum ("Mtpa"). The
initial cave will extract high-grade ore, averaging approximately
1.45% CuEq for the first ten years of production. The extraction of
this high-grade material will not sterilize the surrounding
lower-grade ore. The mining operations will be expanded by an
additional 12Mtpa, increasing to a total annual production rate of
24Mtpa in year 6. The phase 2 mill expansion is expected to be
entirely funded from Project cash flow. This phased approach also
allows for scaling other capital items over time, such as the
tailings storage facility, the camp and mining
equipment.
Lower Technical Risk
The phased development strategy also
contributes to a reduction in technical risk. Incrementally
advancing the Project provides an opportunity to implement and
fine-tune mining and processing methodologies, ensuring a more
efficient and stable production process. This approach enhances the
Project's overall resilience and minimizes potential challenges
associated with large-scale development. A practical height-of-draw
for this deposit was determined to be 400m which is considered to
be more technically feasible than other alternatives.
Accelerated Cash Flow
The Study's results indicate a
strong potential for accelerated cash flow generation. With a
reduced initial capital burden and lower technical risk, Cascabel
is expected to deliver a quicker path to positive cash
flow.
Commitment to Responsible
Mining
SolGold remains committed to
responsible and sustainable mining practices. The Company's
dedication to environmental, social and governance (ESG) standards
remains unwavering. Cascabel's development will continue to
prioritize minimizing environmental impact, promoting community
engagement and ensuring ethical practices throughout the Project's
lifecycle.
Integration of Renewable
Energy
SolGold is proud to prioritize
sustainability and environmental responsibility in the development
of the Cascabel Project. The Company is actively integrating
renewable energy supplied by governmental and private sources into
the Project's energy supply strategy as part of a net zero
commitment.
Project Description
Cascabel is located in
northern Ecuador approximately a three hours' drive north
of Quito, the capital city of Ecuador. Access is via
sealed highways through the closest major centre of Ibarra, located
approximately 80 km south of the property. Infrastructure in the
region and throughout Ecuador is generally of a high
standard, with excellent road access, power and water sources
readily available in the local area.
Cascabel Project - Alpala
Underground: Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") #4
Table 2: Cascabel Project Alpala Underground Mineral
Resource Estimate (Effective Date November 11,
2023)
Cut-Off Grade
(CuEq%)
|
Resource Category
|
Tonnage
(Mt)
|
Grade
|
Contained Metal
|
CuEq
(%)
|
Cu
(%)
|
Au
(g/t)
|
Ag
(g/t)
|
CuEq
(Mt)
|
Cu
(Mt)
|
Au
(Moz)
|
Ag
(Moz)
|
0.21
|
Measured
|
1,576
|
0.64
|
0.43
|
0.35
|
1.16
|
10.0
|
6.7
|
17.5
|
58.6
|
Indicated
|
1,437
|
0.39
|
0.28
|
0.20
|
0.71
|
5.6
|
4.0
|
9.3
|
32.7
|
Measured + Indicated
|
3,013
|
0.52
|
0.35
|
0.28
|
0.94
|
15.6
|
10.7
|
26.8
|
91.3
|
Inferred
|
607
|
0.36
|
0.26
|
0.19
|
0.56
|
2.2
|
1.5
|
3.7
|
11.0
|
Notes:
1. Dr
Arseneau, P. Geo. Associate Consultant with SRK Consulting (Canada)
is responsible for this Mineral Resource statement and is an
"independent Qualified Person" as such term is defined in NI
43-101.
2.
Reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction were assessed
by enclosing the mineralised material in the block model estimate
in a 3D wireframe shape that was constructed with adherence to a
minimum mining unit with geometry appropriate for a block
cave.
3. The
cut-off grade for the shape was defined as the cut-off grade under
a breakeven, eventual economic extraction criterion. The cut-off
grade of 0.21% CuEq was calculated using (copper grade (%)) + (gold
grade (g/t) x 0.683).
4. All
material within this shape was reported in the Mineral Resource
statement as block caving is a non-selective method, and all
material extracted is treated as mill feed.
5. The
material inside the shape without a Mineral Resource category was
reported as planned dilution.
6. The
resulting shape contained planned internal and edge dilution that
the QP considers appropriate.
7. Cut-off
inputs included:
a. Metal
prices of Cu at US$3.60/lb and Au at US$1,700/oz,
b.
Recoveries of Cu 93% and Au 83%,
c. Costs
including mining, processing, general and administration (G&A),
and off-site realization (TCRC), including royalties.
8. The QP
considers that the Mineral Resource has reasonable prospects for
eventual economic extraction by an underground mass mining method
such as block caving.
9. Mineral
Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated
economic viability.
10. Mineral Resources
are reported inclusive of Mineral Reserves.
11. Figures may not add
up due to rounding.
Cascabel Project - Alpala
Underground: Mineral Reserve Estimate
The Mineral Reserves have been
estimated for a block caving method and take into account the
effect of mixing indicated material with dilution from low-grade or
barren material originating from within the caved zone and the
overlying cave backs. The Mineral Resources reflected in MRE#4 are
inclusive of the Mineral Reserve estimate, which represents only
18% of the Measured and Indicated Resource estimate. The mining
practices contemplated in this study do not compromise the
potential extraction of the remaining resources not included in the
current mine plan.
Table 3: Cascabel
Project Alpala Underground Mineral Reserve Estimate
Mineral Reserve Category
|
Tonnage
(Mt)
|
Grade
|
Contained
Metal
|
Cu
(%)
|
Au
(g/t)
|
Ag
(g/t)
|
Cu
(Mt)
|
Au
(Moz)
|
Ag
(Moz)
|
Proven
|
457.5
|
0.64
|
0.60
|
1.7
|
2.9
|
8.9
|
24.9
|
Probable
|
82.2
|
0.36
|
0.22
|
1.2
|
0.3
|
0.6
|
3.1
|
Total
|
539.7
|
0.60
|
0.54
|
1.6
|
3.2
|
9.4
|
28.0
|
Notes:
1. CIM
Definition Standards were followed for Mineral Reserves.
2. Mineral
Reserves for the Cascabel Project have an effective date of
December 31, 2023
3. The
Mineral Reserve reported above was not additive to the Mineral
Resource.
4. The
Mineral Reserve is based on the November 11, 2023 Mineral
Resource.
5. Totals
may not match due to rounding.
6. Mineral
Reserves are reported using long-term metal prices of US$1,700/oz
Au, US$3.60/lb Cu, US$19.90/oz Ag.
7. Mineral
Reserves are constrained within a block cave design, using the
following input parameters: height of draw of 400 m; mixing horizon
of 350 m; 15% dilution (at 350 m column height); overall operating
cost of US$15.00/t; metallurgical recoveries that range from 85-92%
for copper and 70-81% for gold; a footprint development cost of
US$1,750/m2; cut-off value of US$15.00/t.
8. Units are
metric tonnes, metric grams, troy ounces and imperial pounds. Gold
ounces and copper pounds are estimates of in-situ material and do
not account for processing losses.
9. The
Mineral Reserve Estimate as of 31 December 2023 for
Alpala was independently verified by Jarek Jakubec, C.Eng., FIMMM.
Mr. Jakubec fulfils the requirements to be a "Qualified
Person" for the purposes of NI 43-101 and is the Qualified Person
under NI 43-101 for the Mineral Reserve.
Mining
Underground mining will utilize the
block cave mining method, a low-cost, bulk mining method. After a
ramp-up period of approximately two years, the initial cave will
achieve a production rate of 12Mtpa. The initial cave will extract
high-grade ore, averaging 1.5% CuEq for the first ten years of
operation. Extraction of this high-grade material will not
sterilize surrounding lower-grade ore. The mining operations will
be expanded by an additional 12Mtpa, increasing to a total annual
production rate of 24Mtpa in year 6 of mine production.
Ore from the mine will be
transported to the underground primary crushers by load haul dump
loaders ("LHDs") and crushed to minus 160 mm. The crushed ore will
be conveyed directly to the coarse ore stockpile adjacent to the
mill at the surface.
Process Plant
Ore will be reclaimed from the
coarse ore stockpile and conveyed to a conventional semi-autogenous
grinding ball mill crusher ("SABC") circuit. Slurry from the ball
mill will be pumped to the flotation circuit, where concentrate
will be floated, filtered and stored for transport by truck to the
port site concentrate storage barn. Tailings will flow by gravity
to the Tailings Storage Facility.
Production Plan
Additional mining optimization
studies indicated that the optimum production profile for the
Cascabel Project is, to begin with a processing rate of 12Mtpa,
extracting high-grade ore for 6 years, and then expanding the
process plant by an additional 12Mtpa, increasing to a total
processing rate of 24Mtpa. The initial 12Mtpa throughput rate is
expected to be achieved six years after the start of Project
development. Over the current life of mine, the plant is expected
to produce 2.9 million tonnes of copper, 6.9 million ounces of gold
and 18.4 million ounces of silver.
Tandayama-Ameríca (TAM)
Deposit
The TAM deposit, located
approximately 6 kilometres northeast of the Apala deposit, further
emphasizes the significant potential of the Cascabel Project. The
TAM deposit outcrops at the surface, resulting in a low strip
ratio, offering an excellent opportunity to provide additional mill
feed for up to 7 years and the potential for an earlier start of
metal production from an open-cut mining method.
The current evaluation of the TAM
deposit is not at a PFS level and is, therefore, not included in
the Cascabel Project economics presented above or in the PFS mine
plan. The Company will begin the additional metallurgical testing,
waste rock characteristic testing, geotechnical, hydrogeology, and
detailed mine planning required to finalize planning
efforts.
Table 4: Tandayama-Ameríca Mineral Resource Statement
(Effective Date November 11, 2023)
Potential
Mining Method
|
Cut-off
Grade (CuEq %)
|
Resource
Category
|
Tonnage
(Mt)
|
Grade
|
Contained Metal
|
Cu
(%)
|
Au
(g/t)
|
CuEq
(%)
|
Cu
(Mt)
|
Au
(Moz)
|
CuEq
(Mt)
|
Open Pit
|
0.16
|
Indicated
|
492
|
0.22
|
0.20
|
0.35
|
1.1
|
3.1
|
1.7
|
Inferred
|
45
|
0.18
|
0.18
|
0.31
|
0.1
|
0.3
|
0.1
|
Underground
|
0.19
|
Indicated
|
230
|
0.26
|
0.18
|
0.39
|
0.6
|
1.3
|
0.9
|
Inferred
|
201
|
0.21
|
0.21
|
0.36
|
0.4
|
1.4
|
0.7
|
Total Indicated
|
722
|
0.23
|
0.19
|
0.36
|
1.7
|
4.5
|
2.6
|
Total Inferred
|
247
|
0.21
|
0.21
|
0.35
|
0.5
|
1.6
|
0.9
|
Notes:
1.
Dr. Gilles Arseneau, P.
Geo., Associate Consultant with SRK
Consulting (Canada), is responsible for this Mineral
Resource statement and is an "independent Qualified Person" as such
term is defined in NI 43-101.
2.
Reasonable prospects of eventual economic
extraction were assessed by:
a.
First presenting the mineralised material in the
block model estimate to a conventional Lersch-Grossman open pit
optimisation routine based on a cut-off grade of 0.16 % CuEq, and
the cost and revenue assumptions listed below. Mineralised material
inside the revenue factor one pit and above the cut-off grade were
then reported in the "Open pit" section of the Mineral Resource
statement.
b.
Subsequently, the remaining material was enclosed in a 3D wireframe shape that
was constructed with adherence to a minimum mining unit with
geometry appropriate for a block cave.
3.
The Cut-off grade for the underground shape was
defined as the cut-off grade under a breakeven, eventual
economic extraction criterion. The cut-off grade
of 0.19% CuEq was calculated using (copper grade (%)) + (gold grade
(g/t) x 0.683).
4.
All material within the underground shape was
reported in the "Underground" section of the Mineral Resource
statement, as block caving is a non-selective method, and all
material extracted is treated as mill feed.
5.
The resulting shape contained planned internal and
edge dilution that the QP considers appropriate.
6.
Cut-off/Cut-off inputs included:
a. Metal prices of Cu at US$3.60/lb and Au at US$1,700/oz,
b. Recoveries of Cu 93% and Au
83%,
c. Costs including mining, processing and general and
administration (G&A) and
d. Off-site realization (TCRC), including royalties.
7.
The QP considers that the Mineral Resource has
reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction by open pit
or an underground mass mining method such as block caving, as
presented in the Mineral Resource statement.
8.
Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do
not have demonstrated economic viability.
9.
Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of those
Mineral Resources that were converted to Mineral Reserves.
10. Numbers may not add up due to rounding.
Environmental, Social and Governance
("ESG")
SolGold's unwavering commitment to
the highest social and environmental sustainability of our projects
positions the Company as a leading advocate of responsible mining
practices, particularly in Ecuador. As SolGold advances the
Cascabel Project, we remain dedicated to the highest transparency
standards and ESG principles.
In line with our corporate values,
SolGold has established a comprehensive framework encapsulating the
following key ESG criteria:
· Environment: We are deeply committed to managing our carbon
footprint and maximizing the use of renewable resources. We aim to
minimize the ecological impact of our operations and contribute to
a cleaner environment and biodiversity conservation.
· Social: SolGold champions diversity and equitable wages within
our workforce. We believe that fostering an inclusive workplace and
ensuring fair compensation are fundamental to the well-being of our
employees and the communities in which we operate.
· Governance: SolGold is dedicated to adhering to the highest
standards of governance practices. We stand for transparency,
integrity, and accountability in all our operations, aligning
ourselves with global best practices.
Over the past decade, we have forged
robust community partnerships in Ecuador underpinned by extensive
engagement efforts. These relationships underscore our commitment
to responsible resource development and mutual
prosperity.
In accordance with Ecuadorian law,
an Environmental and Sustainability Impact Assessment ("EISA") is
required before obtaining authorization for construction and
operations. SolGold is committed to ensuring the EISA is aligned
with international standards. These standards encompass the Equator
Principles, the International Finance Corporation ("IFC")
Performance Standards, Environmental, Health, and Safety
Guidelines, as well as the Sustainable Development Goals ("SDG"),
as well as other international standards that apply to the mining
sector.
Furthermore, SolGold will undertake
a comprehensive evaluation to manage and reduce the project's
overall carbon footprint. Our initiatives will encompass maximizing
the utilization of renewable energy sources, exploring
electrification of mobile and fixed equipment options, optimizing
operational efficiency through process integration and other
innovative strategies to minimize our environmental
footprint.
Our commitment to ESG principles
remains unwavering, and we are dedicated to ensuring that the
Cascabel Project sets the benchmark for responsible and sustainable
mining practices in Ecuador and beyond.
Sensitivity
Analysis
A sensitivity analysis was performed
on the Study's after-tax NPV8% to examine the
sensitivity to commodity prices, capital costs and operating
costs.
Figure 1:
After-tax
NPV8% Sensitivity to Changes in Project
Parameters
Figure 2:
Metal Price and
Discount Rate Sensitivity
Outstanding Opportunities and Upside
Options
Opportunities for further
optimization of the Cascabel Project that management will continue
to investigate include:
· Process plant design optimization following additional
metallurgical test work focusing on improved gold recovery and
other by-product recovery
· Viability of the TAM open-cut mine to provide early mill
feed
· Continue to examine the impacts of utilizing tunnel boring
technology to accelerate underground development
· Further define the economic benefits of renewable energy, such
as hydro and solar, on the project
· Continue to examine the economic impact of the sub-level cave
mining method on the upper portions of the Alpala
deposit
· Process plant design optimization following additional
metallurgical test work
Next Steps
SolGold intends to release a NI
43-101 technical report on Cascabel within 45 days of this release
(the "Technical Report").
SolGold expects to commence the
technical work to further advance and de-risk the Cascabel
Project.
Qualified Persons
The Qualified Persons for the
"Cascabel Project, Ecuador, NI 43-101 Technical Report on
Pre-Feasibility Study", which has an effective date
of December 31, 2023, are detailed in the table
below.
Category
|
Name
|
Company
|
Mineral Resource Estimate
|
Dr. Gilles Arseneau, P.
Geo.
|
SRK Consulting (Canada)
Inc.
|
Mineral Reserve Estimate and Mining
(Underground)
|
Jarek Jakubec, C.Eng.,
FIMMM
|
SRK Consulting (Canada)
Inc.
|
Mining (Open Pit Tandayama)
|
Scott Wilson, CPG, SME Registered
Member
|
Resource Development Associates
Inc.
|
Environment, Social, Tailings & Water
|
Tim Rowles, BSc MSc FAusIMM CP
RPEQ
|
Knight Piésold Pty
Ltd
|
Metallurgy & Process Plant
|
Ben Adaszynski, P.Eng
|
Sedgman Canada Ltd.
|
Surface Infrastructure
|
Richard Boenke, P.Eng
|
JDS Energy and Mining
Inc.
|
Financial Evaluation and Marketing
|
Carl Kottmeier, P.Eng
|
SRK Consulting (Canada)
Inc.
|
This announcement was approved
for release by Scott Caldwell-Chief Executive Officer.
Certain information
contained in the announcement would have been deemed inside
information.
CONTACTS
Scott Caldwell
SolGold Plc (CEO)
|
Tel: +44
(0) 20 3807 6996
|
Tavistock (Media)
Jos Simson/Gareth Tredway
|
Tel: +44
(0) 20 7920 3150
|
ABOUT
SOLGOLD
SolGold is a leading resources
company focused on the discovery, definition, and development of
world-class copper and gold deposits and continues to strive to
deliver objectives efficiently and in the interests of
shareholders.
The Company operates with
transparency and in accordance with international best practices.
SolGold is committed to delivering value to its shareholders while
simultaneously providing economic and social benefits to impacted
communities, fostering a healthy and safe workplace, and minimizing
environmental impact.
SolGold is listed on the London
Stock Exchange and Toronto Stock Exchange (LSE/TSX:
SOLG).
See www.solgold.com.au
for more
information. Follow us on "X" @SolGold plc
CAUTIONARY NOTICE
News releases, presentations and
public commentary made by SolGold plc (the "Company") and its Officers may contain
certain statements and expressions of belief, expectation or
opinion which are forward looking statements, and which relate,
inter alia, to interpretations of exploration results to date and
the Company's proposed strategy, plans and objectives or to the
expectations or intentions of the Company's Directors, including
the plan for developing the Project currently being studied as well
as the expectations of the Company as to the forward price of
copper. Such forward-looking and interpretative statements involve
known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors
beyond the control of the Company that could cause the actual
performance or achievements of the Company to be materially
different from such interpretations and forward-looking
statements.
Accordingly, the reader should not
rely on any interpretations or forward-looking statements; and save
as required by the exchange rules of the TSX and LSE or by
applicable laws, the Company does not accept any obligation to
disseminate any updates or revisions to such interpretations or
forward-looking statements. The Company may reinterpret results to
date as the status of its assets and projects changes with time
expenditure, metals prices and other affecting
circumstances.
This release may contain
"forward‑looking information". Forward‑looking information
includes, but is not limited to, statements regarding the Company's
plans for developing its properties. Generally, forward‑looking
information can be identified by the use of forward-looking
terminology such as "plans", "expects" or "does not expect", "is
expected", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts",
"intends", "anticipates" or "does not anticipate", or "believes",
or variations of such words and phrases or state that certain
actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or
"will be taken", "occur" or "be achieved".
Forward‑looking information is
subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors
that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance
or achievements of the Company to be materially different from
those expressed or implied by such forward‑looking information,
including but not limited to: transaction risks; general business,
economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties; future
prices of mineral prices; accidents, labour disputes and shortages
and other risks of the mining industry. Although the Company has
attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those contained in
forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause
results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended.
There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be
accurate, as actual results and future events could differ
materially from those anticipated in such statements. Factors that
could cause actual results to differ materially from such
forward-looking information include, but are not limited to, risks
relating to the ability of exploration activities (including assay
results) to accurately predict mineralization; errors in
management's geological modelling and/or mine development plan;
capital and operating costs varying significantly from estimates;
the preliminary nature of visual assessments; delays in obtaining
or failures to obtain required governmental, environmental or other
required approvals; uncertainties relating to the availability and
costs of financing needed in the future; changes in equity markets;
inflation; the global economic climate; fluctuations in commodity
prices; the ability of the Company to complete further exploration
activities, including drilling; delays in the development of
projects; environmental risks; community and non-governmental
actions; other risks involved in the mineral exploration and
development industry; the ability of the Company to retain its key
management employees and skilled and experienced personnel; and
those risks set out in the Company's public documents filed on
SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.
Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on
forward‑looking information. The Company does not undertake to
update any forward-looking information, except in accordance with
applicable securities laws.
The findings in the PFS and the
implementation of the Cascabel project are subject to all the
necessary approvals, permits, internal and regulatory requirements
and further works. The estimates are indicative only and are
subject to market and operating conditions. They should not be
interpreted as guidance. The information contained herein is a
summary only and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the
Technical Report (as defined herein).
The Company and its officers do not
endorse, or reject or otherwise comment on the conclusions,
interpretations or views expressed in press articles or third-party
analysis.
The Company recognises that the term
World Class is subjective and for the purpose of the Company's
projects the Company considers the drilling results at the Alpala
porphyry copper-gold deposit at its Cascabel project to represent
intersections of a World Class deposit on the basis of comparisons
with other drilling intersections from World Class deposits, some
of which have become, or are becoming, producing mines and on the
basis of available independent opinions which may be referenced to
define the term "World Class" (or "Tier 1").
The Company considers that World
Class deposits are rare, very large, long life, low cost, and are
responsible for approximately half of total global metals
production. World Class deposits are generally accepted as deposits
of a size and quality that create multiple expansion opportunities
and have or are likely to demonstrate robust economics that ensure
development irrespective of position within the global commodity
cycles, or whether or not the deposit has been fully drilled out,
or a feasibility study completed.
Standards drawn from industry
experts (1Singer and Menzie, 2010; 2Schodde, 2006; 3Schodde and
Hronsky, 2006; 4Singer, 1995; 5Laznicka, 2010) have characterised
World Class deposits at prevailing commodity prices. The relevant
criteria for World Class deposits, adjusted to current long run
commodity prices, are considered to be those holding or likely to
hold more than 5 million tonnes of copper and/or more than 6
million ounces of gold with a modelled net present value of greater
than US$1billion.
The Company cautions that the
Cascabel Project remains an early-stage project at this time and
there is inherent uncertainty relating to any project at prior to
the determination of pre-feasibility study and/or defined
feasibility study.
On this basis, reference to the
Cascabel Project as "World Class" (or "Tier 1") is considered to be
appropriate.