File Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration No. 333- 208817
3,850,000 American Depositary Shares
Each Representing 100 Ordinary Shares
This prospectus relates to the offer
for sale of up to 385,000,000 ordinary shares represented by 3,850,000 American Depositary Shares, or ADSs, which consists
of (i) 140,000,000 ordinary shares represented by 1,400,000 unregistered ADSs originally issued to investors in a private placement
in March 2017; (ii) 140,000,000 ordinary shares represented by 1,400,000 ADSs issuable upon exercise of unregistered warrants
originally issued to investors in a private placement in March 2017; (iii) 100,000,000 ordinary shares represented by 1,000,000
ADSs issuable upon exercise of unregistered warrants originally issued to investors in a private placement in February 2017 and
(iv) 5,000,000 ordinary shares represented by 50,000 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants issued to the placement agent and
its affiliates in connection with the February 2017 private placement. Each ADS represents 100 ordinary shares. The ADSs are evidenced
by American Depository Receipts, or ADRs. See “Description of Share Capital” in the accompanying prospectus for more
information.
The selling shareholders are identified
in the table commencing on page 68. No ADSs are being registered hereunder for sale by us. We will not receive any proceeds from
the sale of the ADSs by the selling shareholders. All net proceeds from the sale of the ordinary shares represented by ADSs covered
by this prospectus will go to the selling shareholders. However, we may receive the proceeds from any exercise of warrants. See
“Use of Proceeds”.
The selling shareholders may sell all
or a portion of the ordinary shares represented by ADSs from time to time in market transactions through any market on which our
ADSs are then traded, in negotiated transactions or otherwise, and at prices and on terms that will be determined by the then
prevailing market price or at negotiated prices directly or through a broker or brokers, who may act as agent or as principal
or by a combination of such methods of sale. See “Plan of Distribution”.
The ADSs are traded on the NASDAQ Capital
Market, or Nasdaq, and our ordinary shares are listed on the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange, or TASE, under the symbol “XTLB”.
The last reported sale price of the ADSs on Nasdaq was $1.70 per share on March 6, 2018 and the last reported sale price of our
ordinary shares on the TASE on March 6, 2018 was NIS 6.00, or $1.73, per share (based on the exchange rate reported by the Bank
of Israel on that date, which was NIS 3.4690 = $1.00).
Investing in our securities involves
certain significant risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 13
of this prospectus. You should carefully
consider these risk factors, as well as the information contained in this prospectus, before you invest.
None of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, the Israeli Securities Authority or any other state or foreign regulatory body has approved or disapproved of these
securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
Prospectus dated March 6, 2018.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Neither
we nor the selling shareholders have authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from that contained in
this prospectus or in any free writing prospectus we may authorize to be delivered or made available to you. When you make a decision
about whether to invest in our securities, you should not rely upon any information other than the information in this prospectus
or in any free writing prospectus that we may authorize to be delivered or made available to you. Neither the delivery of this
prospectus nor the sale of our securities means that the information contained in this prospectus or any free writing prospectus
is correct after the date of this prospectus or such free writing prospectus. This prospectus is not an offer to sell or the solicitation
of an offer to buy our securities in any circumstances under which the offer or solicitation is unlawful. Persons outside the
United States who come into possession of this prospectus must inform themselves about, and observe any restrictions relating
to, the offering of our securities and the distribution of this prospectus outside the United States.
Unless
otherwise indicated, information contained in this prospectus concerning our industry and the markets in which we operate, including
our general expectations and market position, market opportunity and market share, is based on information from our own management
estimates and research, as well as from industry and general publications and research, surveys and studies conducted by third
parties. Management estimates are derived from publicly available information, our knowledge of our industry and assumptions based
on such information and knowledge, which we believe to be reasonable. Our management estimates have not been verified by any independent
source, and we have not independently verified any third-party information. In addition, assumptions and estimates of our and
our industry's future performance are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors,
including those described in "Risk Factors". These and other factors could cause our future performance to differ materially
from our assumptions and estimates. See "Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements".
Unless otherwise
stated, all references in this prospectus to “we,” “us,” “our,” “XTL,” the “Company”
and similar designations refer to XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. and our subsidiaries. This prospectus supplement contains trademarks
and trade names of XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd., including our name and logo. Other service marks, trademarks and trade names referred
to in this document are the property of their respective owners.
We are a
“foreign private issuer” as defined in Rule 3b-4 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act. As
a result, our proxy solicitations are not subject to the disclosure and procedural requirements of Regulation 14A under the Exchange
Act and transactions in our equity securities by our officers and directors are exempt from Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In
addition, we are not required under the Exchange Act to file periodic reports and financial statements as frequently or as promptly
as U.S. companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act.
This prospectus
contains trademarks and trade names of XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd., including our name and logo. Other service marks, trademarks
and trade names referred to in this document are the property of their respective owners.
GLOSSARY OF CERTAIN
TERMS
In this prospectus,
unless the context otherwise requires:
|
·
|
references
to the American Depositary Shares, which are ordinary shares that have been deposited
with the Bank of New York Mellon, or the “Depositary”;
|
|
·
|
references to the
“Company,” “we,” “our” and “XTL” refer to XTL Biopharmaceuticals, Ltd., an
Israeli company and its consolidated subsidiaries;
|
|
·
|
references to the “Companies Law”
or “Israeli Companies Law” are to Israel’s Companies Law, 5759-1999, as amended;
|
|
·
|
references to “dollars,”
“U.S. dollars” and “$” are to United States Dollars;
|
|
·
|
references to “ordinary
shares,” “our shares” and similar expressions refer to our Ordinary Shares, NIS 0.1 nominal (par) value
per share;
|
|
·
|
references to “Securities
Law” or “Israeli Securities Law” are to Israel Securities Law, 5728-1968, as amended;
|
|
·
|
references to “shekels”
and “NIS” are to New Israeli Shekels, the Israeli currency; and
|
|
·
|
references to the
“SEC” are to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This summary highlights
selected information presented in greater detail elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary does not include all the information
you should consider before investing in our securities. Before investing in our securities, you should read this entire prospectus
carefully for a more complete understanding of our business and this offering, including our audited and unaudited financial statements
and related notes and the sections titled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
Business Overview
We are a biopharmaceutical
company engaged in the acquisition and development of pharmaceutical drugs for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Our current
drug, hCDR1, is a potential treatment for (1) systemic lupus erythematosus, or SLE and (2) Sjogren’s syndrome, or SS.
Our lead drug candidate
is hCDR1, a Phase II-ready asset for the treatment of SLE, the most prominent type of lupus. There is currently no known cure
for SLE. Only one new treatment, Benlysta, has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, in the last 50
years for SLE. Lupus is a chronic autoimmune disease involving many systems in the human body, including joints, kidneys, the
central nervous system, heart, the hematological system and others. The biologic basis of the disease is a defect in the immune
(defense) system, leading to production of self (auto) antibodies, attacking healthy organs and causing irreversible damage. According
to research estimates of the Lupus Foundation of America, at least 1.5 million Americans have the disease (more than 5 million
worldwide) with more than 16,000 new cases diagnosed each year in the United States.
hCDR1 is a peptide
that is administered subcutaneously and acts as a disease-specific treatment to modify the SLE-related autoimmune process. It
does so by specific upstream immunomodulation through the generation of regulatory T cells, reducing inflammation and resuming
immune balance. More than 40 peer-reviewed papers have been published on hCDR1. Two placebo controlled Phase I trials and a placebo
controlled Phase 2 trial, or the PRELUDE trial, were conducted on patients with SLE by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., or
Teva, which had previously in-licensed hCDR1 from Yeda Research and Development, or Yeda. The studies consisted of over 400 patients
and demonstrated that hCDR1 is well tolerated by patients and has a favorable safety profile. The PRELUDE trial did not achieve
its primary efficacy endpoint based on the SLE Disease Activity Index, or SLEDAI scale, resulting in Teva returning the asset
to Yeda. However, the PRELUDE trial showed encouraging results in its secondary clinical endpoint, the British Isles Lupus Activity
Group index, or BILAG index, and, in fact, the 0.5 mg weekly dose showed a substantial effect. Multiple post-hoc analyses also
showed impressive results for this dose using the BILAG index. Such dose will be the focus of the clinical development plan moving
forward. Subsequent to Teva’s return of the program to Yeda, the FDA directed that the primary endpoint in future trials
for Lupus therapies, including those for hCDR1, should be based on either the BILAG index or the SLE Responder Index (“SRI”).
The FDA has provided the Company with written guidance confirming the acceptability of BILAG as the primary endpoint in our planned
study. Given the FDA’s recommendation and the positive findings from the PRELUDE trial (which showed a substantial effect
in the BILAG index), we intend to initiate a new advanced clinical trial, which will include the 0.5 mg dose.
hCDR1is also Phase
II-ready for the treatment of SS. SS is a chronic autoimmune disorder affecting lacrimal and salivary gland function (glandular)
but may also affect other organs and systems (extraglandular) such as the kidneys, gastrointestinal system, blood vessels, lungs,
liver, pancreas, and the nervous system. There is currently no known cure for SS. The only specific treatments available, such
as Salagen and Evoxac, are symptomatic, aiming to alleviate dry eyes and dry mouth. A number of immunomodulatory agents including
corticosteroids, hydroxychloroquine, cyclosporine, and other immunosuppressive agents are used to treat systemic manifestations
of SS. The biologic basis of the disease is a defect in the immune system, leading to production of antibodies that attack healthy
organs causing irreversible damage. Disease prevalence estimations vary from 2.5 million patients (Global Data Research 2016)
to 4 million patients (Sjogren’s Syndrome Foundation) in the US alone, with a worldwide estimate of up to an aggregate of
7.7 million in in the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom, and Japan by the year 2024 (Global Data Research).
In preclinical
studies, blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from blood samples of patients with primary SS (pSS) were incubated in vitro
in the presence of hCDR1 and a control peptide. Following 48 hours of incubation, cells were collected and mRNA was prepared from
all samples. The expression of various genes was determined using real-time -PCR. The results obtained to date indicate that in
vitro incubation of PBMCs of pSS patients with hCDR1 resulted in a significant reduction of gene expression of four pathogenic
cytokines known to be involved in SS and lupus (including B-lymphocyte stimulator or BLyS), as well as upregulation of two immunosuppressive
genes, one of which is a marker for activity of regulatory T cells. The vast majority of such effects were previously seen in
similar studies involving lupus patients. Because amelioration of SLE manifestations in murine models as well as in SLE patients
was associated with down-regulation of pathogenic cytokines, it is likely that hCDR1 is capable of beneficially affecting SS patients.
In addition, based on hCDR1’s favorable safety profile in over 400 SLE patients (as noted above), as well as the same route
of administration as in SLE and similar doses, we believe we can begin the clinical development of hCDR1 in SS with a Phase 2
trial.
Our Strategy
Our objective is to
be a leading biopharmaceutical company engaged in the acquisition and development of pharmaceutical products for the treatment
of autoimmune diseases.
The Company is
expanding its IP portfolio surrounding hCDR1 and has decided to reduce its research and development expenditures in connection
with execution of its clinical trials until full funding for the trials or cooperation with a strategic partner is secured. In
parallel, the Company will look to identify additional assets to add to XTL’s portfolio.
Subject to receiving
adequate financing and/or entering into a collaboration agreement, we plan to:
|
·
|
initiate
an international, prospective advanced clinical study intended to assess the safety and
efficacy of hCDR1 when given to patients with SLE;
|
|
·
|
initiate
a prospective Phase 2 study intended to assess the safety and efficacy of hCDR1 when
given to patients with pSS; and
|
|
·
|
continually build
our pipeline of therapeutic candidates.
|
Certain Recent Developments
In February 2017,
we authorized The Bank of New York Mellon, as depository, to effect on February 10, 2017 a change in the ratio from one ADS representing
20 ordinary shares to a new ratio of one ADS representing 100 ordinary shares.
In February 2017,
we entered into security purchase agreements providing for the issuance of an aggregate of 1,000,000 ADSs in a registered direct
offering at $2.50 per ADS for aggregate gross proceeds of $2,500,000. In addition, we issued unregistered warrants to purchase
an aggregate of 1,000,000 ADSs to investors in the offering and unregistered warrants to purchase an aggregate of 50,000 ADSs
to the placement agent and affiliates of the placement agent. The warrants may be exercised after six months from issuance and
terminate five and a half years from issuance and have an exercise price of $4.10 per ADS, subject to adjustment as set forth
therein.
In March 2017,
we entered into security purchase agreements providing for the issuance of an aggregate of 1,400,000 ADSs in a private placement
transaction at $2.00 per ADS for aggregate gross proceeds of $2,800,000. In addition, we issued unregistered warrants to purchase
1,400,000 ADSs. The Company agreed to hold a shareholder meeting to increase its authorized ordinary shares to allow for the full
exercise of the warrants (the “Authorized Capital Increase”). The warrants have a term of five and a half years,
an exercise price of $2.30 per ADS and shall be exercisable on the later of the effectiveness of the Authorized Share Increase
or six months following the issuance date. We effected the Authorized Capital Increase on August 3, 2017.
In April 2017,
Alexander Rabinovitch was appointed to our board of directors, Dudu Bassa resigned from our board of directors and David Kestenbaum
resigned as our Chief Financial Officer.
In July 2017, Itay
Weinstein was appointed as our Chief Financial Officer.
On August 3, 2017
our shareholders approved the Authorized Capital Increase, authorizing us to increase our authorized share capital by NIS 75,000,000,
such that following effectiveness of the Authorized Capital Increase, our authorized share capital would be equal to the quotient
of NIS 145,000,000 divided into 1,450,000,000 ordinary shares, par value NIS 0.1 each. As a result, we amended our articles of
association accordingly.
Also on August
3, 2017, our shareholders approved the re-appointment of Kesselman & Kesselman, Israel CPAs, a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers
International Limited, as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2017,
the re-election of Alexander Rabinovitch, Dr. Jonathan Schapiro, Shlomo Shalev, Doron Turgeman and Dr. Dobroslav Melamed to our
board of directors, our new employment agreement with our Chief Executive Officer Joshua Levine, including the issuance of options
to purchase 1,000,000 ordinary shares, and our new compensation policy in accordance with the requirements of the Israeli Companies
Law 5759-1999.
Risk Factors
Our business is subject
to numerous risks, as more fully described in the section titled “Risk Factors” immediately following this prospectus
summary. You should read and carefully consider these risks and all of the other information in this prospectus, including the
financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus, before deciding whether to invest in our securities.
In particular, such risks include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
·
|
We
have incurred substantial operating losses since our inception and expect to continue
to incur losses in the future in our drug development activity and may never become profitable.
|
|
·
|
We will require
substantial additional financing to achieve our goals, and a failure to obtain this necessary capital when needed could force
us to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development or commercialization efforts.
|
|
·
|
We have not yet
commercialized any products or technologies, and we may never become profitable.
|
|
·
|
We have limited
experience in conducting and managing clinical trials necessary to obtain regulatory approvals. If our drug candidates and
technologies do not receive the necessary regulatory approvals, we will be unable to commercialize our products.
|
|
·
|
Even if we or our
collaborative/strategic partners or potential collaborative/strategic partners receive approval to market our drug candidates,
if our products fail to achieve market acceptance, we will never record meaningful revenues. We might be unable to develop
product candidates that will achieve commercial success in a timely and cost-effective manner, or ever.
|
|
·
|
Any acquisitions
or in-licensing transactions we make may dilute your equity or require a significant amount of our available cash and may
not be scientifically or commercially successful.
|
|
·
|
Because all of our
proprietary drug candidates and technologies are licensed to us by third parties, termination of these license agreements
could prevent us from developing our drug candidates.
|
Implications of being a Foreign Private Issuer
We are subject to
the information reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, that are applicable to “foreign
private issuers,” and under those requirements we file reports with the SEC. As a foreign private issuer, we are not subject
to the same requirements that are imposed upon U.S. domestic issuers by the SEC. Under the Exchange Act, we are subject to reporting
obligations that, in certain respects, are less detailed and less frequent than those of U.S. domestic reporting companies. For
example, although we report our financial results on a quarterly basis, we will not be required to issue quarterly reports, proxy
statements that comply with the requirements applicable to U.S. domestic reporting companies, or individual executive compensation
information that is as detailed as that required of U.S. domestic reporting companies. We also have four months after the end
of each fiscal year to file our annual reports with the SEC and will not be required to file current reports as frequently or
promptly as U.S. domestic reporting companies. We may also present financial statements pursuant to IFRS instead of pursuant to
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or U.S. GAAP. Furthermore, although the members of our management and supervisory
boards will be required to notify the Israeli Securities Authority of certain transactions they may undertake, including with
respect to our ordinary shares, our officers, directors and principal shareholders will be exempt from the requirements to report
transactions in our equity securities and from the short-swing profit liability provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange
Act. As a foreign private issuer, we are also not subject to the requirements of Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure) promulgated under
the Exchange Act. These exemptions and leniencies reduce the frequency and scope of information and protections available to you
in comparison to those applicable to a U.S. domestic reporting companies.
Our Corporate Information
Our legal and commercial
name is XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. We are incorporated in the State of Israel. Our principal offices are located at 5 Badner
St., Ramat Gan 5218102, Israel, and our telephone number is (972) 3-6116600. Our primary internet address is
www.xtlbio.com
.
None of the information on our website is part of this prospectus or the registration statement of which they are a part and no
portion of such information is incorporated herein. For further information regarding us and our financial information, you should
refer to our recent filings with the SEC. See “Available Information” and “Incorporation of Certain Information
by Reference.”
THE OFFERING
Ordinary
shares as represented by American Depository Shares offered by the selling shareholders
|
|
Up
to an aggregate of 385,000,000 ordinary shares, par value NIS 0.1, represented
by 3,850,000 ADSs, consisting of: (i) 140,000,000 ordinary shares represented by 1,400,000
ADSs originally issued in our March 2017 private placement; (ii) 140,000,000 ordinary
shares represented by 1,400,000 ADSs issuable upon exercise of unregistered warrants
originally issued in our March 2017 private placement; (iii) 100,000,000 ordinary shares
represented by 1,000,000 ADSs issuable upon exercise of unregistered warrants originally
issued in our February 2017 private placement; and (iv) 5,000,000 ordinary shares represented
by 50,000 ADSs issuable upon the exercise of warrants issued to the placement agent and
its affiliates in connection with our February 2017 private placement. The selling shareholders
are identified in the table commencing on page 68. Each ADS represents 100 ordinary shares.
The warrants issued to investors
and to the placement agent and its affiliates in our February 2017 private placement may be exercised at any time beginning
on the six month anniversary from the date of issuance and have an exercise price of $4.10 per ADS, subject to adjustment
as set forth therein. The warrants shall terminate five and a half years after issuance. The warrants may be exercised
on a cashless basis if at the time of exercise there is no effective registrations statement registering the ADSs underlying
the warrants.
The
warrants issued to investors in our March 2017 private placement may be exercised at any time beginning on September 21,
2017 and have an exercise price of $2.30 per ADS, subject to adjustment as set forth therein. The warrants shall terminate
five and a half years after issuance. The warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis if at the time of exercise there
if no effective registration statement registering the ADSs underlying the warrants.
|
Ordinary
shares outstanding immediately after this offering (1)
|
|
759,205,799
ordinary shares, including 245,000,000 ordinary shares registered for resale represented by 2,450,000 ADSs issuable upon exercise
of warrants
|
Depositary
|
|
The
Bank of New York Mellon, Depositary
|
|
|
|
Use of proceeds
|
|
We will not receive
any proceeds from the sale of the ordinary shares represented by ADSs by the selling shareholders. All net proceeds
from the sale of the ordinary shares represented by the ADSs covered by this prospectus will go to the selling shareholders. However,
we may receive the proceeds from any exercise of warrants if the holders do not exercise the warrants on a cashless basis. See
“Use of Proceeds.”
|
NASDAQ
Capital Market Symbol for ADSs
|
|
XTLB
|
|
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
You should read the “Risk Factors” section starting
on page 13
of this
prospectus for a discussion of factors to consider before deciding to invest in our securities.
|
|
(1)
|
The number of ordinary shares that will
be outstanding immediately after this offering is based on 514,205,799 ordinary shares outstanding as of January 31, 2018.
This number excludes, as of such date:
|
|
·
|
19,222,220
ordinary shares represented by 192,222 ADSs issuable upon the exercise of warrants at
a weighted average exercise price of $11.45;
|
|
·
|
7,385,833 ordinary
shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options at a weighted average exercise price of $0.16 per share; and
|
|
·
|
3,284,167 ordinary
shares reserved for future issuances under our stock option and incentive plans.
|
Unless otherwise
indicated, all information in this prospectus assumes or gives effect to no exercise of outstanding options or warrants described
above.
SELECTED FINANCIAL
DATA
The following tables
summarize our financial data. We have derived the following selected consolidated operating data for the years ended December
31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, from our audited consolidated
financial statements, included elsewhere in this prospectus. We have derived the summary consolidated operating data for the years
ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 from
our audited consolidated financial statements not included in this prospectus. The selected financial data as of September 30,
2017 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 are derived from our unaudited interim financial statements that
are included elsewhere in this prospectus. In the opinion of management, these unaudited interim financial statements include
all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of our financial position and operating
results for these periods. Results from interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the
entire year. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in the future.
Our consolidated financial
statements included in this prospectus were prepared in United States dollars in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board.
The following summary
financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations” and our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Operating Data:
|
Unaudited
Nine months ended
September 30,
|
|
Audited
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
U.S
Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
expenses
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
(578
|
)
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(913
|
)
|
|
|
(978
|
)
|
|
|
(1,270
|
)
|
|
|
(1,419
|
)
|
|
|
(1,744
|
)
|
|
|
(1,329
|
)
|
|
|
(2,448
|
)
|
Impairment of intangible assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(848
|
)
|
|
|
(1,604
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
Other gains,
net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(960
|
)
|
|
|
(1,368
|
)
|
|
|
(2,561
|
)
|
|
|
(3,611
|
)
|
|
|
(2,022
|
)
|
|
|
(352
|
)
|
|
|
(1,738
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance cost related to warrants to investors
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Revaluation of warrants to purchase ADSs
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other finance income
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Other finance
expenses
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income (expenses), net
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
(
50
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (losses)
from investment in associate
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(845
|
)
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss
from continuing operations
|
|
|
(779
|
)
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
|
|
(3,622
|
)
|
|
|
(2,119
|
)
|
|
|
(1,138
|
)
|
|
|
(1,119
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items that might be classified to profit
or loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
Reclassification
of foreign currency translation adjustments to Other gains, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Changes in the fair value of available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Realized gain from sale available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
*)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss from continuing
operations
|
|
|
(876
|
)
|
|
|
(1,222
|
)
|
|
|
(2,382
|
)
|
|
|
(3,622
|
)
|
|
|
(2,119
|
)
|
|
|
(1,251
|
)
|
|
|
(1,005
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(689
|
)
|
|
|
(746
|
)
|
|
|
(2,575
|
)
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss for the period
|
|
|
(876
|
)
|
|
|
(1,222
|
)
|
|
|
(2,382
|
)
|
|
|
(4,311
|
)
|
|
|
(2,865
|
)
|
|
|
(3,826
|
)
|
|
|
(1,628
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss for the year attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the Company
|
|
|
(779
|
)
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
|
|
(4,313
|
)
|
|
|
(2,527
|
)
|
|
|
(2,476
|
)
|
|
|
(1,390
|
)
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
(1,237
|
)
|
|
|
(352
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(779
|
)
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
|
|
(4,311
|
)
|
|
|
(2,865
|
)
|
|
|
(3,713
|
)
|
|
|
(1,742
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss for the year attributable
to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the Company
|
|
|
(876
|
)
|
|
|
(1,222
|
)
|
|
|
(2,382
|
)
|
|
|
(4,313
|
)
|
|
|
(2,527
|
)
|
|
|
(2,589
|
)
|
|
|
(1,276
|
)
|
Non-controlling
interests
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(
2
|
)
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
(1,237
|
)
|
|
|
(352
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(876
|
)
|
|
|
(1,222
|
)
|
|
|
(2,382
|
)
|
|
|
(4,311
|
)
|
|
|
(2,865
|
)
|
|
|
(3,826
|
)
|
|
|
(1,628
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss from continuing and
discontinued operations (in U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing operations
|
|
|
(0.002
|
)
|
|
|
(0.005
|
)
|
|
|
(0.009
|
)
|
|
|
(0.014
|
)
|
|
|
(0.009
|
)
|
|
|
(0.005
|
)
|
|
|
(0.005
|
)
|
From discontinued operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(0.003
|
)
|
|
|
(0.002
|
)
|
|
|
(0.006
|
)
|
|
|
(0.001
|
)
|
Basic and diluted
loss per share (in U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
(0.002
|
)
|
|
|
(0.005
|
)
|
|
|
(0.009
|
)
|
|
|
(0.017
|
)
|
|
|
(0.011
|
)
|
|
|
(0.011
|
)
|
|
|
(0.006
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of issued ordinary
shares
|
|
|
455,300,468
|
|
|
|
273,977,887
|
|
|
|
274,035,533
|
|
|
|
263,730,467
|
|
|
|
231,224,512
|
|
|
|
223,605,181
|
|
|
|
217,689,926
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
As
of September 30,
|
|
|
As
of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
U.S
Dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash,
cash equivalents and bank deposits
|
|
6,085
|
|
|
|
2,019
|
|
|
|
3,817
|
|
|
|
2,159
|
|
|
|
4,165
|
|
|
|
3,312
|
|
Working
capital*
|
|
6,158
|
|
|
|
2,424
|
|
|
|
3,829
|
|
|
|
2,081
|
|
|
|
3,870
|
|
|
|
2,143
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
6,825
|
|
|
|
3,017
|
|
|
|
5,323
|
|
|
|
5,644
|
|
|
|
8,015
|
|
|
|
11,086
|
|
Long
term liabilities
|
|
2,919
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
|
3,620
|
|
|
|
2,687
|
|
|
|
4,887
|
|
|
|
4,660
|
|
|
|
6,265
|
|
|
|
7,353
|
|
Non-controlling
interests
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
2,071
|
|
* Working capital means total current
assets minus total current liabilities.
RISK FACTORS
Before
you invest in our ordinary shares or American Depositary Shares, you should understand the high degree of risk involved. You should
carefully consider the risks described below and other information in this report, including our consolidated financial statements
and related notes included elsewhere in this report, before you decide to purchase our ordinary shares or American Depositary
Shares ("ADSs"). If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and operating results
could be adversely affected. As a result, the trading price of our ordinary shares or ADSs could decline and you could lose part
or all of your investment.
Risks
Related to Our Financial Position and Capital Requirements
We have
incurred substantial operating losses since our inception. We expect to continue to incur losses in the future in our drug development
activity and may never become profitable.
You
should consider our prospects in light of the risks and difficulties frequently encountered by development stage companies. We
have incurred operating losses since our inception and expect to continue to incur operating losses for the foreseeable future.
We have not yet commercialized any of our drug candidates or technologies and cannot be sure we will ever be able to do so. Even
if we commercialize one or more of our drug candidates or technologies, we may not become profitable. Our ability to achieve profitability
depends on a number of factors, including our ability to complete our development efforts, consummate out-licensing agreements,
obtain regulatory approval for our drug candidates and technologies and successfully commercialize them.
We expect to continue
to incur losses for the foreseeable future, and these losses will likely increase as we:
|
●
|
initiate and manage pre-clinical
development and clinical trials for our current and new product candidates;
|
|
●
|
seek regulatory approvals for
our product candidates;
|
|
●
|
implement internal systems
and infrastructures;
|
|
●
|
seek to license additional
technologies to develop;
|
|
●
|
hire management and other personnel;
and
|
|
●
|
progress product candidates
towards commercialization.
|
If our product candidates
fail in clinical trials or do not gain regulatory clearance or approval, or if our product candidates do not achieve market acceptance,
we may never become profitable. Even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on
a quarterly or annual basis. Our inability to achieve and then maintain profitability would negatively affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows. Moreover, our prospects must be considered in light of the risks and uncertainties
encountered by an early-stage company and in highly regulated and competitive markets, such as the biopharmaceutical market, where
regulatory approval and market acceptance of our products are uncertain. There can be no assurance that our efforts will ultimately
be successful or result in revenues or profits.
We will require substantial
additional financing to achieve our goals, and a failure to obtain this necessary capital when needed could force us to delay,
limit, reduce or terminate our product development or commercialization efforts.
As December 31,
2016, we had approximately $2,019,000 in cash, cash equivalents and bank deposits, working capital of approximately $2,424,000
and an accumulated deficit of approximately $154,904,000. As September 30, 2017, we had approximately $6,085,000 in cash, cash
equivalents and bank deposits, working capital of approximately $6,158,000 and an accumulated deficit of approximately $155,651,000.
We have incurred continuing losses and depend on outside financing resources to continue our activities. As of September 30, 2017,
we had sufficient cash and cash equivalent balances to expand our IP portfolio surrounding hCDR1, for at least the next twelve
(12) months. We have decided to reduce our research and development expenditures in connection with commencing clinical trials
aimed at developing our product until obtaining its marketing approval, until adequate financing or cooperation with a strategic
partner through a collaborative agreement is secured. Should we fail to raise additional capital under terms acceptable to us,
we will be required to reduce our development activities or sell or grant a sublicense to third parties to use all or part of
our technologies.
We have expended
and believe that, subject to receiving adequate financing and/or entering into a collaboration agreement, we will continue to
expend significant operating and capital expenditures for the foreseeable future developing our product candidates. These expenditures
will include, but are not limited to, costs associated with research and development, manufacturing, conducting preclinical experiments
and clinical trials, contracting with contract manufacturing organizations and contract research organizations, hiring additional
management and other personnel and obtaining regulatory approvals, as well as commercializing any products approved for sale.
Because the outcome of our planned and anticipated clinical trials is highly uncertain, we cannot reasonably estimate the actual
amounts necessary to successfully complete the development and commercialization of our product candidates and any other future
product. In addition, other unanticipated costs may arise. As a result of these and other factors currently unknown to us, we
will require additional funds, through public or private equity or debt financings or other sources, such as strategic partnerships
and alliances and licensing arrangements. In addition, we may seek additional capital due to favorable market conditions or strategic
considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. A failure to fund these
activities may harm our growth strategy, competitive position, quality compliance and financial condition.
Our future capital
requirements depend on many factors, including:
|
·
|
the number and characteristics
of products we develop;
|
|
·
|
the scope, progress,
results and costs of researching and developing our product candidates and conducting preclinical and clinical trials;
|
|
·
|
the timing of, and
the costs involved in, obtaining regulatory approvals;
|
|
·
|
the cost of commercialization
activities if any are approved for sale, including marketing, sales and distribution costs;
|
|
·
|
the cost of manufacturing
any product candidate we successfully commercialize;
|
|
·
|
our ability to establish
and maintain strategic partnerships, licensing, supply or other arrangements and the financial terms of such agreements;
|
|
·
|
the costs involved
in preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining, defending and enforcing patent claims, including litigation costs and the
outcome of such litigation;
|
|
·
|
hCDR1 patent expiration
in 2024 and failure to obtain patent term extension, expand patent protection or obtain data exclusivity in the U.S. and Europe;
|
|
·
|
the costs of in-licensing
further patents and technologies.
|
|
·
|
the cost of development
of in-licensed technologies
|
|
·
|
the timing, receipt
and amount of sales of, or royalties on, any future products;
|
|
·
|
the expenses needed
to attract and retain skilled personnel; and
|
|
·
|
any product liability
or other lawsuits related to existing and/or any future products.
|
Additional
funds may not be available when we need them, on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. If adequate funds are not available
to us on a timely basis, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate preclinical studies, clinical trials or other
research and development activities for our product candidates or delay, limit, reduce or terminate our establishment of sales
and marketing capabilities or other activities that may be necessary to commercialize our product candidates or any future products.
Raising
additional capital may cause dilution to our existing stockholders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish rights
to our technologies or product candidates.
We
may seek additional capital through a combination of private and public equity offerings, debt financings, strategic partnerships
and alliances and licensing arrangements. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible
debt securities, the ownership interests of existing shareholders will be diluted, and the terms may include liquidation or other
preferences that adversely affect shareholder rights. Debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants
limiting or restricting our ability to take certain actions, such as incurring debt, making capital expenditures or declaring
dividends. If we raise additional funds through strategic partnerships and alliances and licensing arrangements with third parties,
we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies or product candidates, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable
to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financing when needed, we may be required to delay, limit,
reduce or terminate our product development or commercialization efforts or grant rights to develop and market product candidates
that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.
Risks Related to our Drug Development
Business
We have not yet commercialized any
products or technologies, and we may never become profitable.
We have not yet commercialized
any products or technologies, and we may never be able to do so. We do not know when or if we will complete any of our product
development efforts, obtain regulatory approval for any product candidates incorporating our technologies or successfully commercialize
any approved products. Even if we are successful in developing products that are approved for marketing, we will not be successful
unless these products gain market acceptance for appropriate indications at favorable reimbursement rates. The degree of market
acceptance of these products will depend on a number of factors, including:
|
●
|
the timing of regulatory
approvals in the countries, and for the uses, we seek;
|
|
●
|
the competitive
environment;
|
|
●
|
the establishment
and demonstration in the medical community of the safety and clinical efficacy of our products and their potential advantages
over existing therapeutic products;
|
|
●
|
our ability to enter
into strategic agreements with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies with strong marketing and sales capabilities;
|
|
●
|
the adequacy and
success of distribution, sales and marketing efforts; and
|
|
●
|
the pricing and
reimbursement policies of government and third-party payors, such as insurance companies, health maintenance organizations
and other plan administrators.
|
Physicians,
patients, third-party payors or the medical community in general may be unwilling to accept, utilize or recommend, and in the
case of third-party payors, cover any of our products or products incorporating our technologies. As a result, we are unable to
predict the extent of future losses or the time required to achieve profitability, if at all. Even if we successfully develop
one or more products that incorporate our technologies, we may not become profitable.
If we are
unable to successfully complete our clinical trial programs for our drug candidates, or if such clinical trials take longer to
complete than we project, our ability to execute our current business strategy will be adversely affected.
Whether
or not and how quickly we complete clinical trials depends in part upon the rate at which we are able to engage clinical trial
sites and, thereafter, the rate of enrollment of patients, and the rate at which we are able to collect, clean, lock and analyze
the clinical trial database. Patient enrollment is a function of many factors, including the size of the patient population, the
proximity of patients to clinical sites, the eligibility criteria for the study, the existence of competitive clinical trials,
and whether existing or new drugs are approved for the indication we are studying. We are aware that other companies are planning
clinical trials that will seek to enroll patients with the same diseases and stages as we are studying. If we experience delays
in identifying and contracting with sites and/or in patient enrollment in our clinical trial programs, we may incur additional
costs and delays in our development programs, and may not be able to complete our clinical trials on a cost-effective or timely
basis.
We have limited experience in conducting
and managing clinical trials necessary to obtain regulatory approvals. If our drug candidates and technologies do not receive
the necessary regulatory approvals, we will be unable to commercialize our products.
We
have not received, and may never receive, regulatory approval for commercial sale for hCDR1. We currently do not have any drug
candidates pending approval with the Food and Drug Administration, or FDA or with regulatory authorities of other countries. We
will need to conduct significant additional research and human testing before we can apply for product approval with the FDA or
with regulatory authorities of other countries. In order to obtain FDA approval to market a new drug product, we or our potential
partners must demonstrate proof of safety and efficacy in humans. To meet these requirements, we and/or our potential partners
will have to conduct “adequate and well-controlled” clinical trials.
Clinical
development is a long, expensive and uncertain process. Clinical trials are very difficult to design and implement, in part because
they are subject to rigorous regulatory requirements. Satisfaction of regulatory requirements typically depends on the nature,
complexity and novelty of the product and requires the expenditure of substantial resources. The commencement and rate of completion
of clinical trials may be delayed by many factors, including:
|
·
|
obtaining regulatory
approvals to commence a clinical trial;
|
|
·
|
reaching agreement
on acceptable terms with prospective CROs, and trial sites, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and
may vary significantly among different CROs and trial sites;
|
|
·
|
slower than expected
rates of patient recruitment due to narrow screening requirements and competing clinical studies;
|
|
·
|
the inability of
patients to meet protocol requirements imposed by the FDA or other regulatory authorities;
|
|
·
|
the need or desire
to modify our manufacturing process;
|
|
·
|
delays, suspension,
or termination of the clinical trials due to the institutional review board responsible for overseeing the study at a particular
study site; and
|
|
·
|
governmental or
regulatory delays or “clinical holds” requiring suspension or termination of the trials.
|
Following
the completion of a clinical trial, regulators may not interpret data obtained from pre-clinical and clinical tests of our drug
candidates and technologies the same way that we do, which could delay, limit or prevent our receipt of regulatory approval. In
addition, the designs of any clinical trials may not be reviewed or approved by the FDA prior to their commencement, and consequently
the FDA could determine that the parameters of any studies are insufficient to demonstrate proof of safety and efficacy in humans.
Failure to approve a completed study could also result from several other factors, including unforeseen safety issues, the determination
of dosing, low rates of patient recruitment, the inability to monitor patients adequately during or after treatment, the inability
or unwillingness of medical investigators to follow our clinical protocols, and the lack of effectiveness of the trials.
Additionally,
the regulators could determine that the studies indicate the drugs may have serious side effects. In the U.S., this is called
a black box warning, which is a type of warning that appears on the package insert for prescription drugs indicating that they
may cause serious adverse effects. A black box warning means that medical studies indicate that the drug carries a significant
risk of serious or even life-threatening adverse effects.
If
the clinical trials fail to satisfy the criteria required, the FDA and/or other regulatory agencies/authorities may request additional
information, including additional clinical data, before approval of marketing a product. Negative or inconclusive results or medical
events during a clinical trial could also cause us to delay or terminate our development efforts. If we experience delays in the
testing or approval process, or if we need to perform more or larger clinical trials than originally planned, our financial results
and the commercial prospects for our drug candidates and technologies may be materially impaired.
Clinical
trials have a high risk of failure. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical industry, including biotechnology companies, have
suffered significant setbacks in clinical trials, even after achieving promising results in earlier trials. It may take us many
years to complete the testing of our drug candidates and technologies, and failure can occur at any stage of this process.
Even
if regulatory approval is obtained, our products and their manufacture will be subject to continual review, and there can be no
assurance that such approval will not be subsequently withdrawn or restricted. Changes in applicable legislation or regulatory
policies, or discovery of problems with the products or their manufacture, may result in the imposition of regulatory restrictions,
including withdrawal of the product from the market, or result in increased costs to us.
If third parties on which we will
have to rely for clinical trials do not perform as contractually required or as we expect, we may not be able to obtain regulatory
approval for or commercialize our products.
We will have to depend
on independent clinical investigators, and other third-party service providers to conduct the clinical trials of our drug candidates
and technologies. We also may, from time to time, engage a clinical research organization for the execution of our clinical trials.
We will rely heavily on these parties for successful execution of our clinical trials, but we will not control many aspects of
their activities. Nonetheless, we are responsible for confirming that each of our clinical trials is conducted in accordance with
the general investigational plan and protocol. Our reliance on these third parties that we do not control does not relieve us
of our responsibility to comply with the regulations and standards of the FDA and/or other foreign regulatory agencies/authorities
relating to good clinical practices. Third parties may not complete activities on schedule or may not conduct our clinical trials
in accordance with regulatory requirements or the applicable trial’s plans and protocols. The failure of these third parties
to carry out their obligations could delay or prevent the development, approval and commercialization of our products, or could
result in enforcement action against us.
Our international
clinical trials may be delayed or otherwise adversely impacted by social, political and economic factors affecting the particular
foreign country.
We
may conduct clinical trials in different geographical locations. Our ability to successfully initiate, enroll and complete a clinical
trial in any of these countries, or in any future foreign country in which we may initiate a clinical trial, are subject to numerous
risks unique to conducting business in foreign countries, including:
|
·
|
difficulty in establishing
or managing relationships with clinical research organizations and physicians;
|
|
·
|
different standards
for the conduct of clinical trials and/or health care reimbursement;
|
|
·
|
our inability to
locate qualified local consultants, physicians, and partners;
|
|
·
|
the potential burden
of complying with a variety of foreign laws, medical standards and regulatory requirements, including the regulation of pharmaceutical
products and treatment; and
|
|
·
|
general geopolitical
risks, such as political and economic instability, and changes in diplomatic and trade relations.
|
Any disruption to
our international clinical trial program could significantly delay our product development efforts.
If the
clinical data related to our drug candidates and technologies do not confirm positive early clinical data or preclinical data,
our corporate strategy and financial results will be adversely impacted.
Our
drug candidates and technologies are in clinical stages. Specifically, our product candidate, hCDR1 is planned for and/or ready
for advanced clinical studies. In order for our candidates to proceed to later stage clinical testing or marketing approval, they
must show positive clinical results.
Preliminary
results of pre-clinical, clinical observations or clinical tests do not necessarily predict the final results, and promising results
in pre-clinical, clinical observations or early clinical testing might not be obtained in later clinical trials. Drug candidates
in the later stages of clinical development may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy traits despite having progressed
through initial clinical testing. Any negative results from future tests may prevent us from proceeding to later stage clinical
testing or marketing approval, which would materially impact our corporate strategy, and our financial results may be adversely
impacted.
If we do not establish or maintain
drug development and marketing arrangements with third parties, we may be unable to commercialize our drug candidates and technologies
into products.
We do not possess
all of the capabilities to fully commercialize our drug candidates and technologies on our own. From time to time, we may need
to contract with third parties to:
|
·
|
assist us in developing,
testing and obtaining regulatory approval for some of our compounds and technologies;
|
|
·
|
manufacture our
drug candidates; and
|
|
·
|
market and distribute
our products.
|
We can provide no
assurance that we will be able to successfully enter into agreements with such third-parties on terms that are acceptable to us.
If we are unable to successfully contract with third parties for these services when needed, or if existing arrangements for these
services are terminated, whether or not through our actions, or if such third parties do not fully perform under these arrangements,
we may have to delay, scale back or end one or more of our drug development programs or seek to develop or commercialize our drug
candidates and technologies independently, which could result in delays. Further, such failure could result in the termination
of license rights to one or more of our drug candidates and technologies. Moreover, if these development or marketing agreements
take the form of a partnership or strategic alliance, such arrangements may provide our collaborators with significant discretion
in determining the efforts and resources that they will apply to the development and commercialization of our products. Accordingly,
to the extent that we rely on third parties to research, develop or commercialize our products, we may be unable to control whether
such products will be scientifically or commercially successful.
Even if we or our collaborative/strategic
partners or potential collaborative/strategic partners receive approval to market our drug candidates, if our products fail to
achieve market acceptance, we will never record meaningful revenues.
Even if our products
are approved for sale, they may not be commercially successful in the marketplace. Market acceptance of our product candidates
will depend on a number of factors, including:
|
·
|
perceptions by members
of the health care community, including physicians, of the safety and efficacy of our products;
|
|
·
|
the rates of adoption
of our products by medical practitioners and the target populations for our products;
|
|
·
|
the potential advantages
that our products offer over existing treatment methods or other products that may be developed;
|
|
·
|
the cost-effectiveness
of our products relative to competing products including potential generic competition;
|
|
·
|
the availability
of government or third-party pay or reimbursement for our products;
|
|
·
|
the side effects
of our products which may lead to unfavorable publicity concerning our products or similar products; and
|
|
·
|
the effectiveness
of our and/or our partners’ sales, marketing and distribution efforts.
|
Specifically, hCDR1,
if successfully developed and commercially launched for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus, or SLE, and Sjogren’s
syndrome, or SS, on the one hand, will compete with both currently marketed and new products marketed by other companies. Health
care providers may not accept or utilize any of our product candidates. Physicians and other prescribers may not be inclined to
prescribe our products unless our products bring clear and demonstrable advantages over other products currently marketed for
the same indications. Because we expect sales of our products to generate substantially all of our revenues in the long-term,
the failure of our products to find market acceptance would harm our business and could require us to seek additional financing
or other sources of revenue.
If the third parties upon whom we
rely to manufacture our products do not successfully manufacture our products, our business will be harmed.
We
do not currently have the ability to manufacture the compounds that we need to conduct our clinical trials and, therefore, rely
upon, and intend to continue to rely upon, certain manufacturers to produce and supply our drug candidates for use in clinical
trials and for future sales. In order to commercialize our products, such products will need to be manufactured in commercial
quantities while adhering to all regulatory and other local requirements, all at an acceptable cost. We may not be able to enter
into future third-party contract manufacturing agreements on acceptable terms, if at all.
If
our contract manufacturers or other third parties fail to deliver our product candidates for clinical use on a timely basis, with
sufficient quality, and at commercially reasonable prices, and we fail to find replacement manufacturers or sources, we may be
required to delay or suspend clinical trials or otherwise discontinue development and production of our drug candidates.
Our
contract manufacturers will be required to produce our clinical drug candidates under strict compliance with current Good Manufacturing
Practices, or cGMP, in order to meet acceptable regulatory standards for our clinical trials. If such standards change, the ability
of contract manufacturers to produce our drug candidates on the schedule we require for our clinical trials may be affected. In
addition, contract manufacturers may not perform their obligations under their agreements with us or may discontinue their business
before the time required by us to successfully produce and market our drug candidates. Any difficulties or delays in our contractors’
manufacturing and supply of drug candidates could increase our costs, cause us to lose revenue or make us postpone or cancel clinical
trials.
In
addition, our contract manufacturers will be subject to ongoing periodic, unannounced inspections by the FDA and corresponding
foreign or local governmental agencies to ensure strict compliance with, among other things, cGMP, in addition to other governmental
regulations and corresponding foreign standards. We will not have control over, other than by contract, third-party manufacturers’
compliance with these regulations and standards. No assurance can be given that our third-party manufacturers will comply with
these regulations or other regulatory requirements now or in the future.
In the event that
we are unable to obtain or retain third-party manufacturers, we will not be able to commercialize our products as planned. If
third-party manufacturers fail to deliver the required quantities of our products on a timely basis and at commercially reasonable
prices, our ability to develop and deliver products on a timely and competitive basis may be adversely impacted and our business,
financial condition or results of operations will be materially harmed.
If our
competitors develop and market products that are less expensive, more effective or safer than our products, our revenues and results
may be harmed and our commercial opportunities may be reduced or eliminated.
The
pharmaceutical industry is highly competitive. Our commercial opportunities may be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop
and market products that are less expensive, more effective or safer than our products. Other companies have drug candidates in
various stages of pre-clinical or clinical development to treat diseases for which we are also seeking to discover and develop
drug candidates. Some of these potential competing drugs are already commercialized or are further advanced in development than
our drug candidates and may be commercialized earlier. Even if we are successful in developing safe, effective drugs, our products
may not compete successfully with products produced by our competitors, who may be able to market their drugs more effectively.
Our
competitors include pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies, as well as universities and public and private research
institutions. In addition, companies that are active in different but related fields present substantial competition for us. Many
of our competitors have significantly greater capital resources, larger research and development staffs and facilities and greater
experience in drug development, regulation, manufacturing and marketing than we do. These organizations also compete with us to
recruit qualified personnel, attract partners for joint ventures or other collaborations, and license technologies that are competitive
with ours. As a result, our competitors may be able to more easily develop products that could render our technologies or our
drug candidates obsolete or noncompetitive. Development of new drugs, medical technologies and competitive medical devices may
damage the demand for our products without any certainty that we will successfully and effectively contend with those competitors.
If we lose
our key personnel or are unable to attract and retain additional personnel, our business could be harmed.
As
of December 31, 2017, we have one part-time employee, our Chief Executive Officer, and five part-time service providers. To successfully
develop our drug candidates and technologies, we must be able to attract and retain highly skilled personnel, including consultants
and employees. The retention of their services cannot be guaranteed. Our failure to retain and/or recruit such professionals might
impair our performance and materially affect our technological and product development capabilities and our product marketing
ability.
Our Chief Financial Officer is
not required to work exclusively for us, which could materially and adversely affect us and our business.
Itay Weinstein,
our Chief Financial Officer, is not required to work exclusively for us and does not devote all of his time to our operations.
Since serving as our Chief Financial Officer, he has devoted approximately 6 hours a week of his time to the operation of our
business. He also serves as a Partner of the accounting firm Shimony C.P.A. It is possible that his pursuit of other
activities may slow our operations and impact our ability to timely complete our financial statements.
Any acquisitions
or in-licensing transactions we make may dilute your equity or require a significant amount of our available cash and may not
be scientifically or commercially successful.
As
part of our business strategy, we may effect acquisitions or in-licensing transactions to obtain additional businesses, products,
technologies, capabilities and personnel. If we complete one or more such transactions in which the consideration includes our
ordinary shares or other securities, your equity may be significantly diluted. If we complete one or more such transactions in
which the consideration includes cash, we may be required to use a substantial portion of our available cash.
Acquisitions
and in-licensing transactions also involve a number of operational risks, including:
|
·
|
difficulty and expense
of assimilating the operations, technology or personnel of the business;
|
|
·
|
our inability to
attract and retain management, key personnel and other employees necessary to conduct the business;
|
|
·
|
our inability to
maintain relationships with key third parties, such as alliance partners, associated with the business;
|
|
·
|
exposure to legal
claims for activities of the business prior to the acquisition;
|
|
·
|
the diversion of
our management’s attention from our other drug development businesses; and
|
|
·
|
the potential impairment
of goodwill and write-off of in-process research and development costs, adversely affecting our reported results of operations.
|
In
addition, the basis for completing the acquisition or in-licensing could prove to be unsuccessful as the drugs or processes involved
could fail to be scientifically or commercially viable. We may also be required to pay third parties substantial transaction fees,
in the form of cash or ordinary shares, in connection with such transactions.
If
any of these risks occur, it could have an adverse effect on both the business we acquire or in-license and our existing operations.
We face
product liability risks and may not be able to obtain adequate insurance.
The
use of our drug candidates and technologies in clinical trials, and the sale of any approved products, exposes us to liability
claims. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against product liability claims, we may incur substantial liabilities or be
required to cease clinical trials of our drug candidates and technologies or limit commercialization of any approved products.
We
believe that we will be able to obtain sufficient product liability insurance coverage for our planned clinical trials. We intend
to expand our insurance coverage to include the commercial sale of any approved products if marketing approval is obtained; however,
insurance coverage is becoming increasingly expensive. We may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost.
We may not be able to obtain additional insurance coverage that will be adequate to cover product liability risks that may arise.
Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, product liability claims may result in:
|
·
|
decreased demand
for a product;
|
|
·
|
damage to our reputation;
|
|
·
|
inability to continue
to develop a drug candidate or technology;
|
|
·
|
withdrawal of clinical
trial volunteers; and
|
Consequently, a product
liability claim or product recall may result in material losses.
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property
Because
all of our proprietary drug candidates and technologies are licensed to us by third parties, termination of these license agreements
could prevent us from developing our drug candidates.
We
do not own any of our drug candidates and technologies. We have licensed the rights, patent or otherwise, to our drug candidates
from third parties. We have licensed hCDR1 from Yeda Research and Development Company Ltd., or Yeda. We licensed a use patent
for the use of rHuEPO from Yeda and Mor Research Applications Ltd., or Mor which we acquired from Bio-Gal Limited, or Bio-Gal.
These
license agreements require us to meet development or financing milestones and impose development and commercialization due diligence
requirements on us. In addition, under these agreements, we must pay royalties on sales of products resulting from licensed drugs
and technologies and pay the patent filing, prosecution and maintenance costs related to the licenses. While we have the right
to defend patent rights related to our licensed drug candidates and technologies, we are not obligated to do so. In the event
that we decide to defend our licensed patent rights, we will be obligated to cover all of the expenses associated with that effort.
If we do not meet our obligations in a timely manner, or if we otherwise breach the terms of our agreements, our licensors could
terminate the agreements, and we would lose the rights to our drug candidates and technologies. From time to time, in the ordinary
course of business, we may have disagreements with our licensors or collaborators regarding the terms of our agreements or ownership
of proprietary rights, which could lead to delays in the research, development, collaboration and commercialization of our drug
candidates, or could require or result in litigation or arbitration, which could be time-consuming and expensive.
If we are
unable to adequately protect our intellectual property, third parties may be able to use our technology, which could adversely
affect our ability to compete in the market.
Our
commercial success will depend in part on our ability and the ability of our licensors to obtain and maintain patent protection
on our drug products and technologies and successfully defend these patents and technologies against third-party challenges. As
part of our business strategy, our policy is to actively file patent applications in the U.S. and internationally to cover methods
of use, new chemical compounds, pharmaceutical compositions and dosing of the compounds and composition and improvements in each
of these. Because of the extensive time required for development, testing and regulatory review of a potential product, it is
possible that before we commercialize any of our products, any related patent may expire or remain in force for only a short period
following commercialization, thus reducing any advantage of the patent.
The
patent positions of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies can be highly uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions.
No consistent policy regarding the breadth of claims allowed in biotechnology patents has emerged to date. Accordingly, the patents
we use may not be sufficiently broad to prevent others from practicing our technologies or from developing competing products.
Furthermore, others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or design around our patented technologies.
The patents we use may be challenged or invalidated or may fail to provide us with any competitive advantage.
Generally,
patent applications in the U.S. are maintained in secrecy for a period of at least 18 months. Since publication of discoveries
in the scientific or patent literature often lag behind actual discoveries, we are not certain that we were the first to make
the inventions covered by each of our pending patent applications or that we were the first to file those patent applications.
We cannot predict the breadth of claims allowed in biotechnology and pharmaceutical patents, or their enforceability. Third parties
or competitors may challenge or circumvent our patents or patent applications, if issued. If our competitors prepare and file
patent applications in the U.S. that claim compounds or technology also claimed by us, we may be required to challenge competing
patent rights, which could result in substantial cost, even if the eventual outcome is favorable to us. While we have the right
to defend patent rights related to the licensed drug candidates and technologies, we are not obligated to do so. In the event
that we decide to defend our licensed patent rights, we will be obligated to cover all of the expenses associated with that effort.
We
also rely on trade secrets to protect technology where we believe patent protection is not appropriate or obtainable. Trade secrets
are difficult to protect. While we require our employees, collaborators and consultants to enter into confidentiality agreements,
this may not be sufficient to protect our trade secrets or other proprietary information adequately. In addition, we share ownership
and publication rights to data relating to some of our drug candidates and technologies with our research collaborators and scientific
advisors. If we cannot maintain the confidentiality of this information, our ability to protect our proprietary information will
be at risk.
Litigation
or third-party claims of intellectual property infringement could require us to spend substantial time, money and other resources
defending such claims and adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize our products.
Third
parties may assert that we are using their proprietary technology without authorization. In addition, third parties may have or
obtain patents in the future and claim that our products infringe their patents. If we are required to defend against patent suits
brought by third parties, or if we sue third parties to protect our patent rights, we may be required to pay substantial litigation
costs, and our management’s attention may be diverted from operating our business. In addition, any legal action against
our licensors or us that seeks damages or an injunction of our commercial activities relating to the affected products could subject
us to monetary liability and require our licensors or us to obtain a license to continue to use the affected technologies. We
cannot predict whether our licensors or we would prevail in any of these types of actions or that any required license would be
made available on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. In addition, any legal action against us that seeks damages or an
injunction relating to the affected activities could subject us to monetary liability and/or require us to discontinue the affected
technologies or obtain a license to continue use thereof.
In
addition, there can be no assurance that our patents or patent applications or those licensed to us will not become involved in
opposition or revocation proceedings instituted by third parties. If such proceedings were initiated against one or more of our
patents, or those licensed to us, the defense of such rights could involve substantial costs and the outcome could not be predicted.
Competitors
or potential competitors may have filed applications for, may have been granted patents for, or may obtain additional patents
and proprietary rights that may relate to compounds or technologies competitive with ours. If patents are granted to other parties
that contain claims having a scope that is interpreted to cover any of our products (including the manufacture thereof), there
can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain licenses to such patents at reasonable cost, if at all, or be able to develop
or obtain alternative technology.
Risks Related to the ADSs and the
Offering
We will
need additional capital in the future. If additional capital is not available, we may not be able to continue to operate our business
pursuant to our business plan or we may have to discontinue our operations entirely.
Our
net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $ 1,732,000 and for the nine months ended September
30, 2017 was $822,000. If we continue to use cash at this rate we will need significant additional financing, which we may seek
to raise through, among other things, public and private equity offerings and debt financing. Any equity financings will likely
be dilutive to existing stockholders, and any debt financings will likely involve covenants restricting our business activities.
Additional financing may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all.
The
sale of a substantial amount of our ordinary shares or ADSs, including resale of the ADSs issuable upon the exercise of the warrants
held by the selling shareholders in the public market could adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock.
We
are registering for resale 385,000,000 ordinary shares represented by 3,850,000 ADSs issuable upon the exercise of warrants held
by the selling shareholders. Sales of substantial amounts of shares of our ordinary shares or ADSs in the public market, or the
perception that such sales might occur, could adversely affect the market price of our ordinary shares, and the market value of
our other securities. We cannot predict if and when selling shareholders may sell such shares in the public markets. Furthermore,
in the future, we may issue additional ordinary shares or ADSs or other equity or debt securities convertible into ordinary shares
or ADSs. Any such issuance could result in substantial dilution to our existing shareholders and could cause our stock price to
decline.
The
ADSs are traded in small volumes, limiting ability to sell ADSs that represent ordinary shares at a desirable price, if at all.
The
trading volume of the ADSs has historically been low. Even if the trading volume of the ADSs increases, we can give no assurance
that it will be maintained or will result in a desirable stock price. As a result of this low trading volume, it may be difficult
to identify buyers to whom shareholders can sell ADSs in desirable volume and shareholders may be unable to sell your ADSs at
an established market price, at a price that is favorable, or at all. A low volume market also limits shareholders’ ability
to sell large blocks of the ADSs at a desirable or stable price at any one time. You should be prepared to own the ADSs indefinitely.
Our stock price can be volatile,
which increases the risk of litigation and may result in a significant decline in the value of your investment.
The trading price
of the ADSs representing our ordinary shares is likely to be highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in price in response
to various factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include:
|
·
|
developments concerning
our drug candidates;
|
|
·
|
announcements of
technological innovations by us or our competitors;
|
|
·
|
introductions or
announcements of new products by us or our competitors;
|
|
·
|
developments in
the markets of the field of activities and changes in customer attributes;
|
|
·
|
announcements by
us of significant acquisitions, in/out license transactions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
|
|
·
|
changes in financial
estimates by securities analysts;
|
|
·
|
actual or anticipated
variations in interim operating results and near-term working capital as well as failure to raise required funds for the continued
development and operations of the company;
|
|
·
|
expiration or termination
of licenses, patents, research contracts or other collaboration agreements;
|
|
·
|
conditions or trends
in the regulatory climate and the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries;
|
|
·
|
failure to obtain
orphan drug designation status for the relevant drug candidates in the relevant regions;
|
|
·
|
increase
in costs and lengthy timing of the clinical trials according to regulatory requirements;
|
|
·
|
failure to increase
awareness of our products;
|
|
·
|
changes in reimbursement
policy by governments or insurers in markets we operate or may operate in the future;
|
|
·
|
any changes in the
regulatory environment relating to our drug candidates;
|
|
·
|
changes in the market
valuations of similar companies; and
|
|
·
|
additions or departures
of key personnel.
|
In
addition, equity markets in general, and the market for biotechnology and life sciences companies in particular, have experienced
extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of companies
traded in those markets. These broad market and industry factors may materially affect the market price of the ADSs, regardless
of our development and operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s
securities, securities class-action litigation has often been instituted against that company. Such litigation, if instituted
against us, could cause us to incur substantial costs to defend such claims and divert management’s attention and resources
even if we prevail in the litigation, all of which could seriously harm our business.
Future
issuances or sales of the ADSs could depress the market for the ADSs.
Future
issuances of a substantial number of the ADSs, or the perception by the market that those issuances could occur, could cause the
market price of our ordinary shares or ADSs to decline or could make it more difficult for us to raise funds through the sale
of equity in the future. Also, if we make one or more significant acquisitions in which the consideration includes ordinary shares
or other securities, your portion of shareholders’ equity in us may be significantly diluted.
Concentration
of ownership of our ordinary shares among our principal stockholders may prevent new investors from influencing significant corporate
decisions.
There
are two shareholders (Mr. Alexander Rabinovitch, a director, and Mr. David Bassa, a former director), who each beneficially hold
more than 5% of our outstanding ordinary shares (approximately 34.75% in the aggregate, as of January 29, 2018). As a result,
these persons, either acting alone or together, may have the ability to significantly influence the outcome of all matters submitted
to our shareholders for approval, including the election and removal of directors and any merger, consolidation or sale of all
or substantially all of our assets. In addition, such persons, acting alone or together, may have the ability to effectively control
our management and affairs. Accordingly, this concentration of ownership may depress the market price of our ordinary shares or
ADSs.
Our ordinary
shares and ADSs trade on two different markets, and this may result in price variations and regulatory compliance issues.
ADSs
representing our ordinary shares are listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market, or Nasdaq, and our ordinary shares are traded
on the TASE. Trading in our securities on these markets is made in different currencies and at different times, including as a
result of different time zones, different trading days and different public holidays in the U.S. and Israel. Consequently, the
effective trading prices of our securities on these two markets may differ. Any decrease in the trading price of our securities
on one of these markets could cause a decrease in the trading price of our securities on the other market.
Holders
of our ordinary shares or ADSs who are U.S. citizens or residents may be required to pay additional income taxes.
There
is a risk that we will be classified as a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for certain tax years. If we are classified
as a PFIC, a U.S. holder of our ordinary shares or ADSs representing our ordinary shares will be subject to special federal income
tax rules that determine the amount of federal income tax imposed on income derived with respect to the PFIC shares. We will be
a PFIC if either 75% or more of our gross income in a tax year is passive income or the average percentage of our assets (by value)
that produce or are held for the production of passive income in a tax year is at least 50%. The risk that we will be classified
as a PFIC arises because cash balances, even if held as working capital, are considered to be assets that produce passive income.
Therefore, any determination of PFIC status will depend upon the sources of our income and the relative values of passive and
non-passive assets, including goodwill. A determination as to a corporation’s status as a PFIC must be made annually. We
believe we may be a PFIC during 2015 and although we have not determined whether we will be a PFIC in 2016, or in any subsequent
year, our operating results for any such years may cause us to be a PFIC. Although we may not be a PFIC in any one year, the PFIC
taint remains with respect to those years in which we were or are a PFIC and the special PFIC taxation regime will continue to
apply.
In
view of the complexity of the issues regarding our treatment as a PFIC, U.S. shareholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors
for guidance as to our status as a PFIC.
As a foreign
private issuer, we are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of applicable SEC and Nasdaq
requirements, which may result in less protection than is accorded to investors under rules applicable to domestic issuers.
As
a foreign private issuer, we will be permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of those
otherwise required under Nasdaq for domestic issuers. For instance, we may follow home country practice in Israel with regard
to, among other things, composition and function of the audit committee and other committees of our Board of Directors and certain
general corporate governance matters. In addition, in certain instances we will follow our home country law, instead of the Nasdaq,
which requires that we obtain shareholder approval for certain dilutive events, such as an issuance that will result in a change
of control of the company, certain transactions other than a public offering involving issuances of a 20% or more interest in
the company and certain acquisitions of the stock or assets of another company. We comply with the director independence requirements
of the Nasdaq, including the requirement that a majority of the Board of Directors be independent. Following our home country
governance practices as opposed to the requirements that would otherwise apply to a United States company listed on Nasdaq may
provide less protection than is accorded to investors under Nasdaq applicable to domestic issuers.
In
addition, as a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the rules and regulations under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, related to the furnishing and content of proxy statements, and our officers, directors
and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of
the Exchange Act. In addition, we are not required under the Exchange Act to file annual, quarterly and current reports and financial
statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as domestic companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange
Act.
ADS holders
are not shareholders and do not have shareholder rights.
The
Bank of New York Mellon, as depositary, executes and delivers the ADSs on our behalf. Each ADS is a certificate evidencing a specific
number of ADSs. The ADS holders will not be treated as shareholders and do not have the rights of shareholders. The depositary
will be the holder of the shares underlying the ADSs. Holders of the ADSs will have ADS holder rights. A deposit agreement among
us, the depositary and the ADS holders, and the beneficial owners of ADSs, sets out ADS holder rights as well as the rights and
obligations of the depositary. New York law governs the deposit agreement and the ADSs. Our shareholders have shareholder rights
prescribed by Israeli law. Israeli law and our Articles of Association, or Articles, govern such shareholder rights. The ADS holders
do not have the same voting rights as our shareholders. Shareholders are entitled to our notices of general meetings and to attend
and vote at our general meetings of shareholders. At a general meeting, every shareholder present (in person or by proxy, attorney
or representative) and entitled to vote has one vote on a show of hands. Every shareholder present (in person or by proxy, attorney
or representative) and entitled to vote has one vote per fully paid ordinary share on a poll. This is subject to any other rights
or restrictions which may be attached to any shares. The ADS holders may instruct the depositary to vote the ordinary shares underlying
their ADSs, but only if we ask the depositary to ask for their instructions. If we do not ask the depositary to ask for their
instructions, the ADS holders are not entitled to receive our notices of general meeting or instruct the depositary how to vote.
The ADS holders will not be entitled to attend and vote at a general meeting unless they withdraw the ordinary shares from the
depository. However, the ADS holders may not know about the meeting far enough in advance to withdraw the ordinary shares. If
we ask for the ADS holders’ instructions, the depositary will notify the ADS holders of the upcoming vote and arrange to
deliver our voting materials and form of notice to them. The depositary will try, as far as is practical, subject to the provisions
of the deposit agreement, to vote the shares as the ADS holders instruct. The depositary will not vote or attempt to exercise
the right to vote other than in accordance with the instructions of the ADS holders. We cannot assure the ADS holders that they
will receive the voting materials in time to ensure that they can instruct the depositary to vote their shares. In addition, there
may be other circumstances in which the ADS holders may not be able to exercise voting rights.
The
ADS holders do not have the same rights to receive dividends or other distributions as our shareholders. Subject to any special
rights or restrictions attached to a share, the directors may determine that a dividend will be payable on a share and fix the
amount, the time for payment and the method for payment (although we have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our ordinary
stock and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future). Dividends and other distributions payable
to our shareholders with respect to our ordinary shares generally will be payable directly to them. Any dividends or distributions
payable with respect to ordinary shares will be paid to the depositary, which has agreed to pay to the ADS holders the cash dividends
or other distributions it or the custodian receives on shares or other deposited securities, after deducting its fees and expenses.
The ADS holders will receive these distributions in proportion to the number of shares their ADSs represent. In addition, there
may be certain circumstances in which the depositary may not pay to the ADS holders amounts distributed by us as a dividend or
distribution.
There are
circumstances where it may be unlawful or impractical to make distributions to the holders of the ADSs.
The
deposit agreement with the depositary allows the depositary to distribute foreign currency only to those ADS holders to whom it
is possible to do so. If a distribution is payable by us in New Israeli Shekels, the depositary will hold the foreign currency
it cannot convert for the account of the ADS holders who have not been paid. It will not invest the foreign currency and it will
not be liable for any interest. If the exchange rates fluctuate during a time when the depositary cannot convert the foreign currency,
the ADS holders may lose some of the value of the distribution.
The
depositary is not responsible if it decides that it is unlawful or impractical to make a distribution available to any ADS holders.
This means that the ADS holders may not receive the distributions we make on our shares or any value for them if it is illegal
or impractical for the depository to make such distributions available to them.
Your percentage ownership in us
may be diluted by future issuances of share capital, which could reduce your influence over matters on which shareholders vote.
Following the completion
of this offering, our board of directors will have the authority, in most cases without action or vote of our shareholders, to
issue all or any part of our authorized but unissued shares, including ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding
warrants and options. Issuances of additional shares would reduce your influence over matters on which our shareholders vote.
We may fail to regain compliance
for continued listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market and a delisting of our
ADSs
could make it more difficult for
investors to sell their shares
Our ADSs were approved
for listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market in July 2013 where they continue to be listed. We are required to meet certain qualitative
and financial tests (including having stockholders’ equity of at least $2.5 million, a market value of listed securities
of $35 million or $500,000 of net income from continuing operations for the most recently completed fiscal year or two of the
most recently completed fiscal years, to maintain the listing of our ADSs on the Nasdaq Capital Market as set forth in Nasdaq
listing rule 5550(b)(1) the (“Stockholders’ Equity Requirement” or “Rule 5550(b)(1)”). If we do
not maintain compliance with the continued listing requirements for Nasdaq within specified periods and subject to permitted extensions,
our ADSs may be recommended for delisting (subject to any appeal we would file). If our ADSs were delisted, it could be more difficult
to buy or sell our ADSs and to obtain accurate quotations, and the price of our stock could suffer a material decline. Delisting
would also impair our ability to raise capital.
On October 17,
2017, Nasdaq informed the Company that it failed to maintain the Stockholders’ Equity Requirement for the quarter ended
June 30, 2017. In accordance with Nasdaq’s rules, the Company had 45 calendar days, or until December 1, 2017, to submit
a plan to regain compliance. On November 27, 2017, the Company reported in its report on Form 6-K (the “Report”) that
its stockholder’ equity was approximately $3.6 million for the period ended September 30, 2017. The increase of stockholders’
equity from June 30, 2017 is mainly due to financial income from the revaluation of the Company’s derivative securities
(warrants to purchase ADSs). On December 5, 2017, Nasdaq informed the Company that, based on its review of the Company’s
Report, the Company regained compliance with the Stockholders’ Equity Requirement. However, there is no guarantee that we
will be able to maintain continued compliance with the Stockholders’ Equity Requirement or other applicable requirements.
If
we fail to maintain compliance with Nasdaq’s continued listing standards, we may be delisted and our ADSs will trade, if
at all, only on the over-the-counter market, such as the OTC Bulletin Board or OTCQX market, and then only if one or more registered
broker-dealer market makers comply with quotation requirements. In addition, delisting of our ADSs could depress the
price of our ADSs, substantially limit liquidity of our ADSs and materially adversely affect our ability to raise capital on terms
acceptable to us, or at all.
Finally, delisting
of our ADSs would likely result in our ADSs becoming a “penny stock” under the Securities Exchange Act. The
principal result or effect of being designated a “penny stock” is that securities broker-dealers cannot recommend
the shares but must trade it on an unsolicited basis. Penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny
stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC, which specifies
information about penny stocks and the nature and significance of risks of the penny stock market. A broker-dealer must also provide
the customer with bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and sales person in the
transaction, and monthly account statements indicating the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account.
In addition, the penny stock rules require that, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules;
the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and
receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing
the trading activity in the secondary market for shares that become subject to those penny stock rules. Under such circumstances,
shareholders may find it more difficult to sell, or to obtain accurate quotations, for our ADSs, and our ADSs would become substantially
less attractive to certain purchasers such as financial institutions, hedge funds and other similar investors.
Risks Relating to Operations in Israel
Conditions in the Middle East and
in Israel may harm our operations.
Our head executive
office, our research and development facilities, as well as some of our planned clinical sites are or will be located in Israel.
Our officers and most of our directors are residents of Israel. Accordingly, political, economic and military conditions in Israel
and the surrounding region may directly affect our business and operations. Since the establishment of the State of Israel in
1948, a number of armed conflicts have taken place between Israel and its neighboring countries, and between Israel and the Hamas
and Hezbollah militant groups. Any hostilities involving Israel or the interruption or curtailment of trade between Israel and
its trading partners could adversely affect our operations and results of operations. In recent years, the hostilities involved
missile strikes against civilian targets in various parts of Israel, including areas in which our employees and some of our consultants
are located, and negatively affected business conditions in Israel. Our offices, located in Ramat Gan, Israel, are within the
range of the missiles and rockets that have been fired sporadically at Israeli cities and towns from Gaza and South Lebanon since
2006, with escalations in violence during which there were a substantially larger number of rocket and missile attacks aimed at
Israel. In addition, Iran has threatened to attack Israel and is widely believed to be developing nuclear weapons. Iran is also
believed to have a strong influence among extremist groups in the region, such as Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and various
rebel militia groups in Syria. Since September 2015, there has been an increase in terrorist attacks on Israeli civilians including
shootings, stabbings and car rammings which has impacted the general feeling of personal safety in the country. These situations
may potentially escalate in the future to more violent events which may affect Israel and us. Any armed conflicts, terrorist activities
or political instability in the region could adversely affect business conditions, could harm our results of operations and could
make it more difficult for us to raise capital. Parties with whom we do business may decline to travel to Israel during periods
of heightened unrest or tension, forcing us to make alternative arrangements when necessary in order to meet our business partners
face to face. In addition, the political and security situation in Israel may result in parties with whom we have agreements involving
performance in Israel claiming that they are not obligated to perform their commitments under those agreements pursuant to force
majeure provisions in such agreements. Further, in the past, the State of Israel and Israeli companies have been subjected to
economic boycotts. Several countries still restrict business with the State of Israel and with Israeli companies. These restrictive
laws and policies may have an adverse impact on our operating results, financial condition or the expansion of our business.
Our commercial insurance
does not cover losses that may occur as a result of events associated with the security situation in the Middle East. Although
the Israeli government currently covers the reinstatement value of direct damages that are caused by terrorist attacks or acts
of war, we cannot assure you that this government coverage will be maintained. Any losses or damages incurred by us could have
a material adverse effect on our business. Any armed conflicts or political instability in the region would likely negatively
affect business conditions and could harm our results of operations.
Further, the State
of Israel and Israeli companies have been subjected to an economic boycott. Several countries still restrict business with the
State of Israel and with Israeli companies. These restrictive laws and policies may have an adverse impact on our operating results,
financial condition or the expansion of our business.
Our results of operations may be
adversely affected by inflation and foreign currency fluctuations.
We hold most of our
cash, cash equivalents and bank deposits in U.S. dollars. As we are located in Israel, a significant portion of our expenses are
in New Israeli Shekels, or NIS, mainly due to payment to Israeli employees and suppliers. As a result, we could be exposed to
the risk that the U.S. dollar will be devalued against the NIS or other currencies, and consequentially our financial results
could be harmed. To protect against currency fluctuations we may decide to hold a significant portion of our cash, cash equivalents,
bank deposits and marketable securities in NIS, as well as to enter into currency hedging transactions. These measures, however,
may not adequately protect us from the adverse effects of inflation in Israel. In addition, we are exposed to the risk that the
rate of inflation in Israel will exceed the rate of devaluation of the New Israeli Shekel in relation to the U.S. dollar or that
the timing of any devaluation may lag behind inflation in Israel.
Provisions of Israeli law may delay,
prevent or otherwise impede a merger with, or an acquisition of, our company, which could prevent a change of control, even when
the terms of such a transaction are favorable to us and our shareholders.
As a company incorporated
under the law of the State of Israel, we are subject to Israeli corporate law. Israeli corporate law regulates mergers, requires
tender offers for acquisitions of shares above specified thresholds, requires special approvals for transactions involving directors,
officers or significant shareholders and regulates other matters that may be relevant to these types of transactions. For example,
a merger may not be consummated unless at least 50 days have passed from the date that a merger proposal was filed by each merging
company with the Israel Registrar of Companies and at least 30 days from the date that the shareholders of both merging companies
approved the merger. In addition, the holder of a majority of each class of securities of the target company must approve a merger.
Moreover, a full tender offer can only be completed if the acquirer receives at least 95% of the issued share capital (provided
that a majority of the offerees that do not have a personal interest in such tender offer shall have approved the tender offer,
except that if the total votes to reject the tender offer represent less than 2% of the company’s issued and outstanding
share capital, in the aggregate, approval by a majority of the offerees that do not have a personal interest in such tender offer
is not required to complete the tender offer), and the shareholders, including those who indicated their acceptance of the tender
offer, may, at any time within six months following the completion of the tender offer, petition the court to alter the consideration
for the acquisition (unless the acquirer stipulated in the tender offer that a shareholder that accepts the offer may not seek
appraisal rights).
Furthermore, Israeli
tax considerations may make potential transactions unappealing to us or to those of our shareholders whose country of residence
does not have a tax treaty with Israel exempting such shareholders from Israeli tax. For example, Israeli tax law does not recognize
tax-free share exchanges to the same extent as U.S. tax law. With respect to mergers, Israeli tax law allows for tax deferral
in certain circumstances but makes the deferral contingent on the fulfillment of numerous conditions, including a holding period
of two years from the date of the transaction during which sales and dispositions of shares of the participating companies are
restricted. Moreover, with respect to certain share swap transactions, the tax deferral is limited in time, and when such time
expires, the tax becomes payable even if no actual disposition of the shares has occurred.
These and other similar
provisions could delay, prevent or impede an acquisition of us or our merger with another company, even if such an acquisition
or merger would be beneficial to us or to our shareholders.
It may be difficult to enforce a
U.S. judgment against us, our officers or our directors or to assert U.S. securities law claims in Israel.
Service of process
upon us, since we are incorporated in Israel, and upon our directors and officers, who reside outside the U.S., may be difficult
to obtain within the U.S. In addition, because substantially all of our assets and most of our directors and officers are located
outside the U.S., any judgment obtained in the U.S. against us or any of our directors and officers may not be collectible within
the U.S. There is a doubt as to the enforceability of civil liabilities under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act pursuant
to original actions instituted in Israel. Subject to particular time limitations and provided certain conditions are met, executory
judgments of a U.S. court for monetary damages in civil matters may be enforced by an Israeli court.
Under applicable
U.S. and Israeli law, we may not be able to enforce covenants not to compete and therefore may be unable to prevent our competitors
from benefiting from the expertise of some of our former employees. In addition, employees may be entitled to seek compensation
for their inventions irrespective of their agreements with us, which in turn could impact our future profitability.
We generally enter
into non-competition agreements with our employees and key consultants. These agreements prohibit our employees and key consultants,
if they cease working for us, from competing directly with us or working for our competitors or clients for a limited period of
time. We may be unable to enforce these agreements under the laws of the jurisdictions in which our employees work and it may
be difficult for us to restrict our competitors from benefitting from the expertise our former employees or consultants developed
while working for us. For example, Israeli courts have required employers seeking to enforce non-compete undertakings of a former
employee to demonstrate that the competitive activities of the former employee will harm one of a limited number of material interests
of the employer which have been recognized by the courts, such as the secrecy of a company’s confidential commercial information
or the protection of its intellectual property. If we cannot demonstrate that such interests will be harmed, we may be unable
to prevent our competitors from benefiting from the expertise of our former employees or consultants and our ability to remain
competitive may be diminished.
In addition, Chapter
8 to the Israeli Patents Law, 5727-1967, or the Patents Law, deals with inventions made in the course of an employee’s service
and during his or her term of employment, whether or not the invention is patentable, or service inventions. Section 134 of the
Patents Law, sets forth that if there is no agreement which explicitly determines whether the employee is entitled to compensation
for the service inventions and the extent and terms of such compensation, such determination will be made by the Compensation
and Rewards Committee, a statutory committee of the Israeli Patents Office. As a result, it is unclear if, and to what extent,
our research and development employees may be able to claim compensation with respect to our future revenue. As a result, we may
receive less revenue from future products if such claims are successful, which in turn could impact our future profitability.
Your rights
and responsibilities as a shareholder will be governed by Israeli law which may differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities
of shareholders of U.S. companies.
We are incorporated
under Israeli law. The rights and responsibilities of the holders of our ordinary shares and ADSs are governed by our Articles
of Association and Israeli law. These rights and responsibilities differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities
of shareholders in typical U.S.-based corporations. In particular, a shareholder of an Israeli company has a duty to act in good
faith toward the company and other shareholders and to refrain from abusing its power in the company, including, among other things,
in voting at the general meeting of shareholders on matters such as amendments to a company’s articles of association, increases
in a company’s authorized share capital, mergers and acquisitions and interested party transactions requiring shareholder
approval. In addition, a shareholder who knows that it possesses the power to determine the outcome of a shareholder vote or to
appoint or prevent the appointment of a director or executive officer in the company has a duty of fairness toward the company.
There is limited case law available to assist us in understanding the implications of these provisions that govern shareholders’
actions. These provisions may be interpreted to impose additional obligations and liabilities on holders of our ordinary shares
and ADSs that are not typically imposed on shareholders of U.S. corporations.
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain matters discussed
in this prospectus, including matters discussed under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations,” may constitute forward-looking statements for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, or the Securities Act, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and involve known
and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially
different from the future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The words
“anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “may,” “expect” and similar expressions
are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. Our actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated
in these forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation, those discussed under the captions
“Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”
in this prospectus, and any documents incorporated by reference herein, as well as other factors which may be identified from
time to time in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, or in the documents where such forward-looking
statements appear. All written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety
by these cautionary statements. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:
|
·
|
fluctuations
in the market price of our securities;
|
|
·
|
the
possibility that our securities could be delisted from Nasdaq or the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange,
or TASE;
|
|
·
|
potential
dilution to the holders of our securities as a result of future issuances of our securities;
|
|
·
|
fluctuations
in our results of operations;
|
|
·
|
the
accuracy of our financial forecasts in our drug development activity and the uncertainty
regarding the adequacy of our liquidity to pursue our complete business objectives;
|
|
·
|
the
timing and cost of the in-licensing, partnering and acquisition of new product opportunities;
|
|
·
|
the
timing of expenses associated with product development and manufacturing of the proprietary
drug candidates that we have acquired — hCDR1 for the treatment of SLE and SS,
and those that may be in-licensed, partnered or acquired;
|
|
·
|
the
costs involved in prosecuting and enforcing patent claims and other intellectual property
rights; and
|
|
·
|
other
risks and uncertainties described in this prospectus.
|
The forward-looking
statements contained in this prospectus reflect our views and assumptions only as of the date of this prospectus. Except as required
by law, we assume no responsibility for updating any forward-looking statements.
We qualify all of
our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements. In addition, with respect to all of our forward-looking statements,
we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995.
EXCHANGE
RATE INFORMATION
As of March 6,
2018, the daily representative exchange rate of NIS per U.S. dollars was 3.4690. The following table sets forth information regarding
the exchange rates of NIS per U.S. dollars for the periods indicated. Average rates are calculated by using the daily representative
rates as reported by the Bank of Israel on the last day of each month during the periods presented.
|
|
NIS
per U.S. $
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Period
End
|
|
2017
|
|
|
3.860
|
|
|
|
3.467
|
|
|
|
3.600
|
|
|
|
3.467
|
|
2016
|
|
|
3.983
|
|
|
|
3.746
|
|
|
|
3.841
|
|
|
|
3.845
|
|
2015
|
|
|
4.053
|
|
|
|
3.761
|
|
|
|
3.884
|
|
|
|
3.902
|
|
2014
|
|
|
3.994
|
|
|
|
3.402
|
|
|
|
3.578
|
|
|
|
3.889
|
|
2013
|
|
|
3.791
|
|
|
|
3.471
|
|
|
|
3.609
|
|
|
|
3.471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NIS
per U.S. $
|
|
Nine
months Ended September 30,
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Period
End
|
|
2017
|
|
|
3.860
|
|
|
|
3.490
|
|
|
|
3.630
|
|
|
|
3.529
|
|
2016
|
|
|
3.983
|
|
|
|
3.746
|
|
|
|
3.864
|
|
|
|
3.846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NIS per U.S. $
|
|
Month Ended
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Period End
|
|
February 2018
|
|
|
3.535
|
|
|
|
3.427
|
|
|
|
3.494
|
|
|
|
3.485
|
|
January 2018
|
|
|
3.460
|
|
|
|
3.388
|
|
|
|
3.423
|
|
|
|
3.405
|
|
December 2017
|
|
|
3.860
|
|
|
|
3.467
|
|
|
|
3.503
|
|
|
|
3.467
|
|
November 2017
|
|
|
3.544
|
|
|
|
3.499
|
|
|
|
3.517
|
|
|
|
3.499
|
|
October 2017
|
|
|
3.5420
|
|
|
|
3.4910
|
|
|
|
3.5124
|
|
|
|
3.5210
|
|
September 2017
|
|
|
3.5840
|
|
|
|
3.5040
|
|
|
|
3.5374
|
|
|
|
3.5290
|
|
PRICE
RANGE OF OUR ORDINARY SHARES
Our ordinary shares
have been trading on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, or TASE, since July 2005. Our ordinary shares currently trade on the TASE under
the symbol “XTLB”.
The following table
sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing prices of our ordinary shares on the TASE. For comparative purposes
only, we have also provided such figures translated into U.S. Dollars at an exchange rate of 3.4690 NIS per U.S. Dollar, as of
March 6, 2018 according to the Bank of Israel.
|
|
NIS
|
|
|
U.S. dollar ($)
|
|
|
|
Price Per Ordinary Share
|
|
|
Price Per Ordinary Share
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
Annual:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
2016
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
2015
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
2014
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter of 2018 (through March 6, 2018)
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
Fourth Quarter of 2017
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
Third Quarter of 2017
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
Second Quarter of 2017
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
First Quarter 2017
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
Fourth Quarter of 2016
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
Third Quarter of 2016
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
Second Quarter 2016
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
First Quarter 2016
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Recent Six Months:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 2018 (through March 6, 2018)
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
February 2018
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
January 2018
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
December 2017
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
November 2017
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
October 2017
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
September 2017
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
On March 6, 2018,
the last reported sales price of our ordinary shares on the TASE was NIS 6.00 per share, or $1.73 per share. On March 6,
2018, the exchange rate of the NIS to the dollar was $1.00 = NIS 3.4690 as reported by the Bank of Israel.
PRICE
RANGE OF OUR ADSs
On June 1, 2012, we
filed an application for relisting its ADSs on the Nasdaq Stock Exchange. On July 10, 2013, we received a notice from Nasdaq stating
that the admission committee had approved our application to relist its ADSs for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market. Accordingly,
on July 15, 2013, the ADSs began trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the ticker symbol “XTLB”.
The following table
presents, for the periods indicated, the high and low market closing prices for the ADSs as reported on the Pink Sheets from 2011
until July 14, 2013, and on Nasdaq from July 15, 2013 to the present. Effective February 10, 2017, we effected a change in the
ratio of our ADSs to ordinary shares from one ADS representing 20 ordinary shares to one ADS representing 100 ordinary shares.
For convenience of the readers of this
prospectus
, the data below was adjusted so that all the quotes of the ADS price
would represent the current ADS-NIS 0.1 par value ordinary share ratio, meaning 1:100.
|
|
U.S.$
|
|
|
|
Price Per ADS
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
Annual:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
4.70
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
|
2016
|
|
|
7.50
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
2015
|
|
|
13.00
|
|
|
|
7.05
|
|
2014
|
|
|
24.75
|
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
2013
|
|
|
37.10
|
|
|
|
11.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter of 2018 (through March 6, 2018)
|
|
|
2.55
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
|
Fourth Quarter of 2017
|
|
|
2.94
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
Third Quarter of 2017
|
|
|
3.56
|
|
|
|
2.40
|
|
Second Quarter of 2017
|
|
|
3.28
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
|
First Quarter of 2017
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2016
|
|
|
4.85
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
Third Quarter 2016
|
|
|
6.35
|
|
|
|
4.55
|
|
Second Quarter 2016
|
|
|
6.40
|
|
|
|
4.35
|
|
First Quarter 2016
|
|
|
7.50
|
|
|
|
5.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Recent Six Months:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 2018 (through March 6, 2018)
|
|
|
1.79
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
|
February 2018
|
|
|
2.24
|
|
|
|
1.73
|
|
January 2018
|
|
|
2.55
|
|
|
|
2.18
|
|
December 2017
|
|
|
2.62
|
|
|
|
2.18
|
|
November 2017
|
|
|
2.94
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
October 2017
|
|
|
2.69
|
|
|
|
2.16
|
|
September 2017
|
|
|
2.67
|
|
|
|
2.40
|
|
On March 6, 2018, the
last reported sales price of the ADSs on the Nasdaq Capital Market was $1.70 per share.
As of March 6, 2018,
we had 1,330,543 ADSs outstanding. One ADS represents one hundred ordinary shares. See “Description of Share Capital”
for a description of the rights attaching to the ADSs.
USE OF PROCEEDS
We will not receive
any proceeds from the sale of the ordinary shares represented by ADSs by the selling shareholders. All net proceeds from the sale
of the ordinary shares represented by ADSs covered by this prospectus will go to the selling shareholders. We expect that the
selling shareholders will sell their ordinary shares represented by ADSs as described under “Plan of Distribution.”
We may receive
proceeds from the exercise of the warrants to the extent that these warrants are exercised for cash. Warrants, however, are exercisable
on a cashless basis if at the time of exercise there is no effective registration statement registering the underlying ordinary
shares for resale. If all of the warrants mentioned above were exercised for cash in full, the gross proceeds would be approximately
$7,525,000. We intend to use the net proceeds of such warrant exercise, if any, to continue the development of hCDR1, to expand
our IP portfolio relating to hCDR1, and also for working capital and general corporate purposes. As well, we may seek to acquire
additional assets to add to XTL’s portfolio and therefore proceeds, if any, will be used to further any such additional
assets. The amounts and schedule of our actual expenditures will depend on multiple factors including the progress of our clinical
development and regulatory efforts, the status and results of the clinical trials, the pace of our partnering efforts in regards
to manufacturing and commercialization and the overall regulatory environment. Therefore, our management will retain broad discretion
over the use of the proceeds from this offering. We may ultimately use the proceeds for different purposes than what we currently
intend. Pending any ultimate use of any portion of the proceeds from this offering, if the anticipated proceeds will not be sufficient
to fund all the proposed purposes, our management will determine the order of priority for using the proceeds, as well as the
amount and sources of other funds needed. We can make no assurances that any of the warrants will be exercised, or if exercised,
that they will be exercised for cash, the quantity which will be exercised or in the period in which they will be exercised.
DIVIDEND POLICY
We have never declared
or paid cash dividends to our shareholders. Currently we do not intend to pay cash dividends. We intend to reinvest any earnings
in developing and expanding our business. Any future determination relating to our dividend policy will be at the discretion of
our board of directors and will depend on a number of factors, including future earnings, our financial condition, operating results,
contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects, applicable Israeli law and other factors our board of directors
may deem relevant.
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read
the following discussion along with our financial statements and the related notes included in this prospectus. The following
discussion contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those discussed
under “Risk Factors.” Our actual results, performance and achievements may differ materially from those expressed
in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. See “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” We have
prepared our financial statements in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the IASB.
Overview
We
are a biopharmaceutical company engaged in the acquisition and development of pharmaceutical drugs for the treatment of autoimmune
diseases. Our current lead drug compound, hCDR1, is for the treatment of SLE and SS.
We
were established as a corporation under the laws of Israel in 1993, and commenced operations to use and commercialize technology
developed at the Weizmann Institute, in Rehovot, Israel. Since commencing operations, our activities have been primarily devoted
to developing our technologies and drug candidates, acquiring pre-clinical and clinical-stage compounds, raising capital, purchasing
assets for our facilities, and recruiting personnel. We have had no drug product sales to date. Our major sources of working capital
have been proceeds from various private and public offerings of our securities and option and warrant exercises.
We
have incurred negative cash flow from operations each year since our inception and we anticipate incurring negative cash flows
from operating activities for the foreseeable future. We have spent, and expect to continue to spend, substantial amounts in connection
with implementing our business strategy, including our planned product development efforts, our clinical trials, and potential
in-licensing and acquisition opportunities.
Our
research and development expenses primarily consisted of expenses related to the hCDR1 development plan. As part of the preparations
for future clinical trials of hCDR1, we engaged regulatory and clinical consultants and commenced work on Chemistry, Manufacturing
and Control, or CMC, including production and testing of the drug substance. The Company is expanding its IP portfolio surrounding
hCDR1 and has decided to reduce its research and development expenditures in connection with execution of its clinical trials
until full funding for the trials or cooperation with a strategic partner is secured. In parallel, the Company will look to identify
additional assets to add to XTL’s portfolio.
Subject to receiving
adequate financing and/or entering into a collaboration agreement, we plan to:
|
·
|
initiate
an international, prospective advanced clinical study intended to assess the safety and
efficacy of hCDR1 when given to patients with SLE;
|
|
·
|
initiate
a prospective Phase 2 study intended to assess the safety and efficacy of hCDR1 when
given to patients with pSS; and
|
|
·
|
continually build
our pipeline of therapeutic candidates.
|
Our
general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, consultant fees, and related expenses for executive, finance
and other administrative personnel, professional fees, director fees and other corporate expenses, including investor relations,
business development costs and facilities related expenses. We expense our general and administrative costs as incurred.
Our
results of operations include non-cash compensation expense as a result of the grants of XTL stock options. Compensation expense
for awards of options granted to employees and directors represents the fair value of the award (measured using the Black-Scholes
valuation model) recorded over the respective vesting periods of the individual stock options (see details below.)
For
awards of options and warrants to consultants and other third-parties, according to IFRS 2, the treatment of such options and
warrants is the same as employee options compensation expense (see note 16 to the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2016). We record compensation expense based on the fair value of the award at the grant date according to the
Black-Scholes valuation model. According to IFRS 2, in non-performance-based options, we recognize options expenses using the
graded vesting method (accelerated amortization). Graded vesting means that portions of a single option grant will vest on several
dates, equal to the number of tranches. We treat each tranche as a separate share option grant; because each tranche has a different
vesting period, and hence the fair value of each tranche is different. Therefore, under this method the compensation cost amortization
is accelerated to earlier periods in the overall vesting period.
Our
planned clinical trials will be lengthy and expensive. Even if these trials show that our drug candidates are effective in treating
certain indications, there is no guarantee that we will be able to record commercial sales of any of our product candidates in
the near future or generate licensing revenues from upfront payments associated with out-licensing transactions. In addition,
we expect losses in our drug development activity to continue as we continue to fund development of our drug candidates. As we
continue our development efforts, we may enter into additional third-party collaborative agreements and may incur additional expenses,
such as licensing fees and milestone payments. As a result, our periodical results may fluctuate and a period-by-period comparison
of our operating results may not be a meaningful indication of our future performance.
Results of Operations
Nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the
Nine months ended September 30, 2016
Research and
development expenses.
Research and development expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were $47,000 compared
to $390,000 for the same period in 2016. The decrease in expenses in 2017 compared to 2016 for this period is mainly due to our
focus in 2016 on preparing hCDR1 for upcoming clinical trials including regulatory and consulting services and the completion
of production and testing of the drug product.
General and
administrative expenses
. General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were $913,000, compared
to $973,000 for the same period in 2016. The decrease in expenses in 2017 compared to 2016 for this period is mainly due to decrease
in share-based compensation expenses and investor relations expenses, offset by increase in professional services due to filing
a registration statement on Form F-1 in 2017.
Financial income,
net.
Financial income, net for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $181,000 compared to financial income, net of
$28,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The increase in financial income, net, was mainly due to the revaluation
of the Company’s derivative securities (warrants to purchase ADSs).
Total Loss from
continuing operations,.
Loss from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $779,000 compared
to $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The decrease in our loss from continuing operations for the nine
months ended September 2017 compares to this period in 2016 is due primarily to the decrease in our research and development expenses
and due to the financial income from the revaluation of the Company’s derivative securities (warrants to purchase ADSs).
Year ended December 31, 2016
compared to the year ended December 31, 2015
Research
and Development Expenses
. Research and development expenses in the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 totaled approximately
$443 thousand and $578 thousand, respectively. Research and development expenses are comprised mainly of expenses related to preparations
for initiating the phase 2 clinical trials of the hCDR1 drug designed to treat SLE and pSS patients. The decrease in expenses
in 2016 compared to 2015 is mainly due to professional consulting expenses in 2015 related to the preparation and submission to
the U.S. FDA of our pre-IND meeting package for our planned clinical study of the hCDR1 drug for the treatment of SLE patients
filing of a pre-IND meeting package related to our hCDR1 drug. Expenses incurred in 2016 include, among other things, chemistry,
manufacturing and control (CMC) costs for production of the drug product, pre-clinical experiments on the use of hCDR1 for the
treatment of pSS patients, as well as clinical and regulatory consulting fees.
General
and Administrative Expenses
. General and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 totaled approximately
$1,270 thousand and $1,419 thousand, respectively. The decrease in 2016 compared to 2015 is mainly due to the Company's efforts
to reduce overhead costs.
Impairment
of intangible assets.
The Company is required to determine, at least on an annual basis and as of year-end, whether the
fair value of its unamortized intangible assets exceeds their book value. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized
an impairment in the amount of $848 and $1,604 thousand, respectively, with regard to the rHuEPO intangible asset which is fully
impaired as of December 31, 2016. For further information, see also Note 10 of the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2016.
Finance
(income) expenses, net
. Finance (income) expenses, net for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 totaled approximately
($16) thousand and $11 thousand, respectively. The decrease in finance expenses in 2016 compared to 2015 derives mainly from a
reduced exposure to NIS/USD exchange rate fluctuations due to lower NIS cash balances in 2016 compared to 2015.
Total
loss from discontinued operations
. Total loss from discontinued operations of approximately $689 thousand for the year ended
December 31, 2015 , is derived from the deconsolidation of the Company’s investment in InterCure, a former subsidiary.
Year ended December 31, 2015
compared to the year ended December 31, 2014
Research
and Development Expenses
. Research and development expenses in the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 totaled approximately
$578 thousand and $278 thousand, respectively. Research and development expenses are comprised mainly of expenses related to preparations
for initiating the phase 2 clinical trials of the hCDR1 drug designed to treat SLE patients. The increase in expenses in 2015
compared to 2014 is mainly due to expenses related to our hCDR1 drug. Expenses incurred in 2015 include, among other things, chemistry,
manufacturing and control (CMC) costs for production of the drug substance and drug product, as well as clinical and regulatory
consulting fees related to the preparation and submission to the U.S. FDA of our pre-IND meeting package for our planned clinical
study of the hCDR1 drug for the treatment of SLE patients.
General
and Administrative Expenses
. General and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 totaled approximately
$1,419 thousand and $1,744 thousand, respectively. The decrease in 2015 compared to 2014 is mainly due to the Company's efforts
to reduce overhead costs as well as lower share-based compensation expenses.
Impairment
of intangible assets.
The Company is required to determine, on at least an annual basis and as of year-end, whether the
fair value of its unamortized intangible assets exceeds their book value. As of December 31, 2015, the Company recognized an impairment
in the amount of $1,604 thousand with regard to the rHuEPO intangible asset. For further information, see note 10 of the consolidated
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Finance
expenses, net
. Finance expenses, net for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 totaled approximately $11 thousand and
$97 thousand, respectively. The decrease in finance expenses in 2015 compared to 2014 derives mainly from a reduced exposure to
NIS/USD exchange rate fluctuations due to lower NIS cash balances in 2015 compared to 2014.
Total
loss from discontinued operations
. Total loss from discontinued operations of approximately $689 thousand and $746 thousand,
is derived from the Company’s investment in InterCure, a former subsidiary. Such loss for the year ended December 31, 2015
represents a loss from the deconsolidation of InterCure.
Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates
We describe our
significant accounting policies more fully in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31,
2016.
Basis of presentation
of the consolidated financial statements.
The consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiary (the
“Group”) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016 have
been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards which are standards and interpretations issued by
the IASB (“IFRS”).
The significant accounting
policies described below are consistent with those of all periods presented, unless indicated otherwise.
The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires the Company’s
management to exercise its judgment in the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies. The areas that involve judgment
which has significant effect or complexity or where assumptions and estimates are significant to the consolidated financial statements
are disclosed in Note 3 to the annual consolidated financial statements. Actual results could significantly differ from the estimates
and assumptions used by the Group’s management.
Financial liabilities at fair value
through profit or loss:
In accordance with
International Accounting Standard 32: "Financial Instruments: Presentation", warrants allotted to investors with a cashless
exercise mechanism are a "financial liability". As the aforementioned liability is a non-equity derivative financial
instrument, it is classified in accordance with International Accounting Standard 39 "Financial Instruments: Recognition
and Measurement" ("IAS 39") as a financial liability at fair value through profit or loss, which is measured at
its fair value at each date of the balance sheet, with changes in the fair value carried to "revaluation of warrants to purchase
ADS's" in the statement of comprehensive loss
The Company analyzes
the expenses recognized in the statement of comprehensive loss by classification based on the function of expense.
Subsidiaries consolidation and business
combinations
The consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of the Company and entities controlled by the Company. Control exists when the Company has the
power over the investee, has exposure, or rights, to variable returns from involvement in the investee, and has the ability to
use its power over the investee to affect its returns.
The Company examines
whether it controls another entity even when it does not hold more than 50% of the voting rights, but can control the entity’s
financial and operating policies by de-facto control. De-facto control can be created under circumstances in which the ratio of
the Company’s voting rights in the entity to the percentage and dispersion of the holdings of the other shareholders grants
the Company the power to control the entity’s financial and operating policies.
Subsidiaries are fully
consolidated starting from the date on which control therein is attained by the Company. Their consolidation ceases when such
control is discontinued.
Intra-group balances
and transactions, including revenues, expenses and dividends in respect of transactions between the Group companies, are eliminated.
Gains and losses arising from intra-group transactions that have been recognized as assets (such as inventories and property,
plant and equipment) are also eliminated. Such intra-group losses may point to the impairment of assets which is tested and accounted
for as specified below.
Transactions with
non-controlling interests in subsidiaries which do not result in loss of control in the subsidiaries are accounted for as transactions
with owners. In these transactions, the difference between the fair value of any consideration paid or received and the amount
of adjustment of the non-controlling interests to reflect the changes in their relative rights in the subsidiaries is directly
recognized in equity and attributed to the equity holders of the parent.
Associate
An associate is an
entity over which the Group exercises significant influence, but not control, which is usually expressed in holding 20%-50% of
the voting rights. The investment in an associate is presented using the equity method of accounting. According to the equity
method of accounting, the investment is initially recognized at cost and its carrying amount varies to the extent that the Group
recognizes its share of the associate’s earnings or losses from the acquisition date.
The Group’s
share in the earnings or losses of associates after the acquisition date is carried to profit or loss and its share in the other
comprehensive income movements after the acquisition date is carried to other comprehensive income against the carrying amount
of the investment.
Intangible assets
|
1.
|
Brand
name and technology:
|
Brand name and technology acquired
in a business combination are recognized at fair value on the acquisition date. Brand name and technology have a finite useful
life and are presented at cost net of accumulated amortization and impairment losses. The amortization is calculated using the
straight-line method over the expected useful life (9-10 years).
Acquired licenses to use computer
software are capitalized based on costs incurred in acquiring the specific software and preparing it for use. These costs are
amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life (five years). Costs relating to computer software upkeep
are recognized as expenses as incurred.
|
3.
|
Unamortized intangible
assets (licenses and patent rights)
|
The amortization of an asset
on a straight-line basis over its useful life begins when the development procedure is completed and the asset is available for
use. These assets are reviewed for impairment once a year or whenever there are indicators of a possible impairment, in accordance
with the provisions of IAS 36, “Impairment of Assets”.
|
4.
|
Research and development
|
Research expenditures are recognized
as expenses when incurred. Costs arising from development projects are recognized as intangible assets when the following criteria
are met:
|
·
|
it
is technically feasible to complete the intangible asset so that it will be available
for use;
|
|
·
|
management intends
to complete the intangible asset and use or sell it;
|
|
·
|
there is an ability
to use or sell the intangible asset;
|
|
·
|
it can be demonstrated
how the intangible asset will generate probable future economic benefits;
|
|
·
|
adequate technical,
financial and other resources to complete the development and to use or sell the intangible asset are available; and
|
|
·
|
the expenditure
attributable to the intangible asset during its development can be reliably measured.
|
Other development expenditures
that do not meet these criteria are recognized as an expense when incurred. Development costs that were previously recognized
as an expense are not recognized as an asset in a later period. During the three years ended December 31, 2016, the Group did
not capitalize development costs to intangible assets.
Impairment of intangible assets
Intangible assets
which are not yet available for use are not depreciated and impairment in their respect is tested every year. Depreciable assets
are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The
recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use. For the purposes of assessing
impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cash-generating units).
Non-financial assets that sustained impairment are reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment at each date of the statement
of financial position.
Share capital
The Company’s
ordinary shares are classified as share capital. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issuance of new shares or options
are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the issuance proceeds.
When Group companies
purchase Company shares (treasury shares), the consideration paid, including incremental costs directly attributable to the purchase
(less the effect of taxes on income), is deducted from the equity attributable to equity holders of the parent until the shares
are eliminated or reissued. When these shares are reissued in subsequent periods, the consideration received, less incremental
costs directly attributable to the transaction and less the effect of taxes on income, is included in equity attributable to equity
holders of the parent.
Share-based payment
The Group operates
a number of share-based payment plans to employees and to other service providers who render services that are similar to employees’
services that are settled with the Group’s equity instruments. In this framework, the Group grants employees, from time
to time, and at its sole discretion, options to purchase shares of the Group companies. The fair value of services received from
employees in consideration of the grant of options is recognized as an expense in the statement of comprehensive income (loss)
and correspondingly carried to equity. The total amount recognized as an expense over the vesting term of the options (the term
over which all pre-established vesting conditions are expected to be satisfied) is determined by reference to the fair value of
the options granted at grant date, except the effect of any non-market vesting conditions.
Non-market vesting
conditions are included in the assumptions used in estimating the number of options that are expected to vest. The total expense
is recognized over the vesting period, which is the period over which all of the specified vesting conditions of the share-based
payment arrangement are to be satisfied.
In each reporting
date, the Company revises its estimates of the number of options that are expected to vest based on the non-market vesting conditions
and recognizes the impact of the revision to original estimates, if any, in the statement of comprehensive income (loss) with
a corresponding adjustment in equity.
When the options are
exercised, the Company issues new shares. The proceeds net of any directly attributable transaction costs are credited to share
capital (nominal value) and share premium.
Share-based payment
transactions in which the Company acquired assets as consideration for the Company’s equity instruments are measured at
the value of the assets acquired.
Provisions
A provision in accordance
to IAS 37 is recognized when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of an event that occurred
in the past, it is probable that the Group will be required to use economic resources to settle the obligation and it can be reliably
estimated. The group recognizes a provision for warranty when the product is sold to the customer or when the service is provided
to the customer. Initial recognition is based on past experience. The estimated provision is re-tested every year.
Non-current assets (or disposal groups)
held for sale
Non-current assets
(or disposal groups) are classified as held for sale when their carrying amount will be recovered principally through a sale transaction
rather than through continuing use.
Discontinued operations
A discontinued operation
is a component of an entity that either has been disposed of, or is classified as held for sale, and represents a separate major
line of business or geographical area of operations, or is part of a single coordinated plan to dispose of a separate major line
of business or geographical area of operations or is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to resale.
Revenues and expenses
attributable to discontinued operations are presented in the statement of comprehensive loss under the item “Total
loss
from discontinued operations
”, for all years presented.
Critical Accounting Estimates and
Judgments
Estimates and judgments
are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that
are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
|
1.
|
Critical accounting
estimates and assumptions
|
Accounting estimates will,
by definition, seldom equal the related actual results. The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing
a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are addressed below.
|
(i)
|
In
testing impairment of research and development assets, the Company’s management
is required to estimate, among other things, the probable endpoints of trials conducted
by the Company, the commercial technical feasibility of the development and the resulting
economic benefits. Actual results and estimates to be made in the future may significantly
differ from current estimates.
|
|
(ii)
|
The Group is required
to determine at the end of each reporting period whether there is any indication that an asset may be impaired. If indicators
for impairment are identified, the Group estimates the assets’ recoverable amount, which is the higher of an asset’s
fair value less costs to sell and its value-in-use. The value-in-use calculations require management to make estimates of
the projected future cash flows. Determining the estimates of the future cash flows is based on management past experience
and best estimate for the economic conditions that will exist over the remaining useful economic life of the Cash Generating
Unit (CGU).
|
|
·
|
Share-based payments
– in evaluating the fair value and the recognition method of share-based payment, the Company’s management is
required to estimate, among others, different parameters included in the computation of the fair value of the options and
the Company’s results and the number of options that will vest.
|
Impact of Inflation and Currency
Fluctuations
We
hold most of our cash, cash equivalents and bank deposits in US dollars. While a substantial amount of our operating expenses
are in US dollars, we incur a portion of our expenses in New Israeli Shekels. In addition, we also pay for some of our services
and supplies in the local currencies of our suppliers. As a result, we are exposed to the risk that the US dollar will be devalued
against the New Israeli Shekel or other currencies, and as result our financial results could be harmed if we are unable to protect
against currency fluctuations in Israel or other countries in which services and supplies are obtained in the future. Accordingly,
we may enter into currency hedging transactions to decrease the risk of financial exposure from fluctuations in the exchange rates
of currencies. The Company’s treasury’s risk management policy is to hold NIS-denominated cash and cash equivalents
and short-term deposits in the amount of the anticipated NIS-denominated liabilities for six consecutive months from time to time
in line with the directives of the Company’s Board. These measures, however, may not adequately protect us from the adverse
effects of inflation in Israel. In addition, we are exposed to the risk that the rate of inflation in Israel will exceed the rate
of devaluation of the New Israeli Shekel in relation to the US Dollar or that the timing of any devaluation may lag behind inflation
in Israel. Future activities may lead us to perform a clinical trial in Israel, which may lead us to reassess our use of the US
dollar as our functional currency.
As
of December 31, 2016, had the Group’s functional currency weakened by 10% against the NIS with all other variables remaining
constant, loss for the year would have been $22 thousand lower (2015 loss approximately $20 thousand lower; 2014 - loss approximately
$85 thousand lower), mainly as a result of exchange rate changes on translation of other accounts receivable, net and exchange
rate changes on NIS-denominated cash and cash equivalents and short-term deposits. Loss was less sensitive to fluctuations in
the exchange rate in relation to the NIS in 2016 than in 2015 mainly because of the decreased amount of the NIS-denominated balances
in the items of cash, receivables and payables of the Group.
Governmental Economic, Fiscal,
Monetary or Political Policies that Materially Affected or Could Materially Affect Our Operations
Tax
rates applicable to the Company:
|
·
|
Taxable
income of the Company is subject to a corporate tax rate as follow: 2015 - 26.5% and
2016 - 25%.
|
|
·
|
On January 5,
2016, the Israeli Parliament officially published the Law for the Amendment of the Israeli Tax Ordinance (Amendment 216),
that reduces the standard corporate income tax rate from 26.5% to 25%.
|
|
·
|
In December 2016,
the Israeli Parliament approved the Economic Efficiency Law (Legislative Amendments for Applying the Economic Policy for the
2017 and 2018 Budget Years), 2016 which reduces the corporate income tax rate to 24% (instead of 25%) effective from January
1, 2017 and to 23% effective from January 1, 2018.
|
As
of December 31, 2016, XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. did not have any taxable income. As of December 31, 2016, our net operating
loss carry forwards for Israeli tax purposes registered on behalf of XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. amounted to approximately $30
million. Under Israeli law, these net-operating losses may be carried forward indefinitely and offset within XTL Biopharmaceuticals
Ltd only, against future taxable income, including capital gains from the sale of assets used in the business, with no expiration
date.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have financed
our operations from inception primarily through various proceeds from various private and public offerings of our securities and
option and warrant exercises. As of September 30, 2017, we received net proceeds of approximately $85.5 million from various private
placement transactions, public offerings and exercises of warrants, including most recently $2.8 million from our private placement
in March 2017.
The discussion
of our liquidity and capital resources below excludes any balances in InterCure, as it is considered a discontinued operation
as of December 31, 2014.
As of September
30, 2017, we had approximately $6.1 million in cash and cash equivalents, an increase of approximately $4.1 million from December
31, 2016.
Net cash used in
operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $0.8 million, compared to net cash used in operating activities
of $1.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The decrease in net cash used in operating activities is mainly
due to decrease in our research and development expenses.
Net cash provided
by (used in) investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $1,000 compared to net cash used in investing
activities of $(66,000) for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The decrease in net cash provided by investing activities
is primarily due to intangible asset purchase in 2016.
Net cash provided
by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $4.8 million compared to net cash provided by investing
activities of $0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The increase in net cash provided by finance activities
is due to the proceeds from issuing shares and warrants during 2017.
We have incurred
continuing losses and depend on outside financing resources to continue our activities. We have decided to reduce our research
and development expenditures in connection with execution of our clinical trials until full funding for the trials or cooperation
with a strategic partner is secured. In parallel, we will look to identify additional assets to add to our portfolio.
Subject to receiving
adequate financing and/or entering into a collaboration agreement, we plan to:
|
·
|
initiate an international,
prospective advanced clinical study intended to assess the safety and efficacy of hCDR1 when given to patients with SLE;
|
|
·
|
initiate
a prospective Phase 2 study intended to assess the safety and efficacy of hCDR1 when
given to patients with pSS; and
|
|
·
|
continually build
our pipeline of therapeutic candidates.
|
Based on existing
business plans, our management estimates that our outstanding cash and cash equivalent balances will allow us to finance our activities
for an additional period of at least 12 months from the date of this prospectus. However, the amount of cash which we will need
in practice to finance our activities depends on numerous factors which include, but are not limited to, the timing, planning
and execution of clinical trials of existing drugs and future projects which we might acquire or other business development activities
such as acquiring new technologies and/or changes in circumstances which are liable to cause significant expenses to us in excess
of management’s current and known expectations as of the date of these financial statements and which will require us to
reallocate funds against plans, also due to circumstances beyond our control.
We expect to incur
additional losses through the end of 2018 and beyond arising from research and development activities, testing additional technologies
and operating activities, which will be reflected in negative cash flows from operating activities. In order to perform the clinical
trials aimed at developing a product until obtaining its marketing approval, we may be required to raise additional funds in the
future by issuing securities. Should we fail to raise additional capital in the future under standard terms, we will be required
to minimize our activities or sell or grant a sublicense to third parties to use all or part of its technologies.
Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, Etc.
Research
and development costs in 2016, 2015, 2014 and the nine months ended September 30, 2017 substantially derived from costs related
to the hCDR1 and, to a lesser degree, rHuEPO, development plans. As part of the preparations for a planned clinical study of hCDR1,
the Company engaged regulatory and clinical consultants and completed work on CMC, including production and testing of the drug
substance and drug product.
hCDR1 for the Treatment of SLE
The
Company is expanding its IP portfolio surrounding hCDR1 and has decided to reduce its R&D expenditure in connection with execution
of its clinical trials until full funding for the trials or cooperation with a strategic partner is secured.
Subject to receiving
adequate financing and/or entering into a collaboration agreement, we plan to:
|
·
|
initiate an international,
prospective advanced clinical study intended to assess the safety and efficacy of hCDR1 when given to patients with SLE;
|
|
·
|
initiate
a prospective Phase 2 study intended to assess the safety and efficacy of hCDR1 when
given to patients with pSS; and
|
|
·
|
continually build
our pipeline of therapeutic candidates.
|
rHuEPO for the Treatment of
Multiple Myeloma
We
have decided to concentrate our efforts and resources on the development of hCDR1 and therefore do not expect to initiate any
activities related to rHuEPO and are currently negotiating licensing of the rHuEPO to a third party.
The
following table sets forth the research and development costs for the years 2016, 2015 and 2014 including all costs related to
the clinical-stage projects, our pre-clinical activities, and all other research and development. We in-licensed hCDR1 in January
2014 and started preparations for clinical development of this asset during the year. We started preparations for rHuEPO clinical
development in the last quarter of 2010 (after the completion of the Bio-Gal transaction on August 2010). We in-licensed SAM-101
in November 2011 and in June 2015, the Company terminated the license agreement and all rights in and to the licensed technology
reverted to MinoGuard. Whether or not and how quickly we commence and complete development of our clinical stage projects is dependent
on a variety of factors, including the rate at which we are able to engage clinical trial sites and the rate of enrollment of
patients. As such, the costs associated with the development of our drug candidates will probably increase significantly.
|
|
Nine months
ended
September
|
|
|
Research and development
Expenses in thousand US$
|
|
|
|
30,
|
|
|
Year ended December
31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hCDR1
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
rHuEPO
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
SAM-101
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Total Research and Development
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
Trend Information.
We are a development
stage company and it is not possible for us to predict with any degree of accuracy the outcome of our research, development or
commercialization efforts. As such, it is not possible for us to predict with any degree of accuracy any significant trends, uncertainties,
demands, commitments or events that are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our net sales or revenues, income from
continuing operations, profitability, liquidity or capital resources, or that would cause financial information to not necessarily
be indicative of future operating results or financial condition. However, to the extent possible, certain trends, uncertainties,
demands, commitments and events are identified in the preceding subsections.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.
We have not entered
into any transactions with unconsolidated entities whereby we have financial guarantees, subordinated retained interests, derivative
instruments or other contingent arrangements that expose us to material continuing risks, contingent liabilities, or any other
obligations under a variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that provides us with financing, liquidity, market risk or credit
risk support.
Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations.
As
of December 31, 2016, we had known contractual obligations, commitments and contingencies of approximately $10 thousand which
related to lease obligations for our previous offices in Ra’anana, all of which were due within the next year. In April
2015, we signed an operational lease agreement for our previous offices in Ra’anana. In addition, we entered into an agreement
with subtenants to lease part of the office space in exchange for approximately $1,200 per month. The agreement was in effect
until April 2017. In November 2017 we signed a new lease agreement for our offices in Herzeliya, Israel. Under this agreement,
we pay approximately $1,200 per month for rent. In addition, we may terminate the lease agreement in any event upon 60 days notice.
We
do not carry any contractual obligations, commitments or contingencies relates to research and development operations.
Payment
due by period as of December 31, 2016 (in thousands of US$)
|
Contractual
obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less
than 1 year
|
|
|
More
than 1 year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
lease obligations
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
As of September
30, 2017 the Company's did not have any contractual obligations are for an operating lease of office space.
Pursuant
to our asset purchase agreement to acquire the rights to develop rHuEPO for the treatment of Multiple Myeloma from Bio-Gal Ltd.,
we are obligated to pay 1% royalties on net sales of the product, as well as a fixed royalty payment in the total amount of $350
thousand upon the successful completion of Phase 2. The payment of $350 thousand is to be made to Yeda upon the earlier of (i)
six months from the successful completion of Phase 2 or (ii) the completion of a successful fundraising by XTL at any time after
the completion of the Phase 2 in an amount of at least $2 million. No Phase 2 study has been initiated on this compound.
According
to the licensing agreement signed with Yeda to develop hCDR1, a Phase II-ready asset for the treatment of SLE. The terms of the
licensing agreement include, among other things, expense reimbursement for patent expenses payable in six installments (as of
December 31, 2016 four out of the six installments have been paid in cash or through issuance of shares), certain milestone payments
to Yeda, low single-digit royalties based on net sales, and additional customary royalties to the Office of the Chief Scientist.
BUSINESS
Business Overview
We
are a biopharmaceutical company engaged in the acquisition and development of pharmaceutical drugs for the treatment of autoimmune
diseases. Our current lead drug candidate hCDR1 is for the treatment of (1) systemic lupus erythematosus, or SLE, and (2) Sjogren’s
syndrome, or SS.
hCDR1
is a Phase II-ready asset for the treatment of SLE. There is currently no known cure for SLE. The current treatment of SLE aims
to control disease activity by using hydroxychloroquine, and, based on disease activity and severity, treatment may also require
corticosteroids and various immunosuppressives such as cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine. Only one new treatment,
Benlysta, has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, in the last 50 years for SLE. SLE is a chronic autoimmune
disease involving many systems in the human body, including joints, kidneys, the central nervous system, heart, the hematological
system and others. The biologic basis of the disease is a defect in the immune (defense) system, leading to production of self
(auto) antibodies, attacking healthy organs and causing irreversible damage. According to research estimates of the Lupus Foundation
of America, at least 1.5 million Americans have the disease (more than 5 million worldwide) with more than 16,000 new cases diagnosed
each year in the United States.
hCDR1
is a peptide that is administered subcutaneously and acts as a disease-specific treatment to modify the SLE-related autoimmune
process. It does so by specific upstream immunomodulation through the generation of regulatory T cells, reducing inflammation
and resuming immune balance. More than 40 peer-reviewed papers have been published on hCDR1. Two placebo controlled Phase I trials
and a placebo controlled Phase 2 trial, or the PRELUDE trial, were conducted on patients with SLE by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries,
Ltd., or Teva, which had previously in-licensed hCDR1 from Yeda Research and Development, or Yeda. The studies consisted of over
400 patients and demonstrated that hCDR1 is well tolerated by patients and has a favorable safety profile. The PRELUDE trial did
not achieve its primary efficacy endpoint based on the SLE Disease Activity Index, or SLEDAI scale, resulting in Teva returning
the asset to Yeda. However, the PRELUDE trial showed encouraging results in its secondary clinical endpoint, the British Isles
Lupus Activity Group index, or BILAG index, and, in fact, the 0.5 mg weekly dose showed a substantial effect. Multiple post-hoc
analyses also showed impressive results for this dose using the BILAG index. Such dose will be the focus of the clinical development
plan moving forward. Subsequent to Teva’s return of the program to Yeda, the FDA directed that the primary endpoint in future
trials for SLE therapies, including those for hCDR1, should be based on either the BILAG index or the SLE Responder Index (“SRI”).
The FDA has provided the Company with written guidance confirming the acceptability of BILAG as the primary endpoint in our planned
study. Given the FDA’s recommendation and the positive findings from the PRELUDE trial (which showed a substantial effect
in the BILAG index), we intend to initiate a new advanced clinical trial, which will include the 0.5 mg dose, subject to receipt
of adequate financing .
hCDR1is
also Phase II-ready for the treatment of SS. SS is a chronic autoimmune disorder affecting lacrimal and salivary gland function
(glandular) but may also affect other organs and systems (extraglandular) such as the kidneys, gastrointestinal system, blood
vessels, lungs, liver, pancreas, and the nervous system. There is currently no known cure for SS. The only specific treatments
available, such as Salagen and Evoxac, are symptomatic, aiming to alleviate dry eyes and dry mouth. A number of immunomodulatory
agents including corticosteroids, hydroxychloroquine, cyclosporine, and other immunosuppressive agents are used to treat systemic
manifestations of SS. The biologic basis of the disease is a defect in the immune system, leading to production of antibodies
that attack healthy organs causing irreversible damage. Disease prevalence estimations vary from 2.5 million patients (Global
Data Research 2016) to 4 million patients (Sjogren’s Syndrome Foundation) in the US alone, with a worldwide estimate of
up to an aggregate of 7.7 million in in the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom, and Japan by the year
2024 (Global Data Research).
In preclinical
studies, blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from blood samples of patients with primary SS (pSS) were incubated in vitro
in the presence of hCDR1 and a control peptide. Following 48 hours of incubation, cells were collected and mRNA was prepared from
all samples. The expression of various genes was determined using real-time PCR. The results obtained to date indicate that in
vitro incubation of PBMCs of pSS patients with hCDR1 resulted in a significant reduction of gene expression of four pathogenic
cytokines known to be involved in SS and lupus (including B-lymphocyte stimulator or BLyS), as well as upregulation of two immunosuppressive
genes, one of which is a marker for activity of regulatory T cells. The vast majority of such effects were previously seen in
similar studies involving lupus patients.. Because amelioration of SLE manifestations in murine models as well as in SLE patients
was associated with down-regulation of pathogenic cytokines, it is likely that hCDR1 is capable of beneficially affecting SS patients.
In addition, based on hCDR1’s favorable safety profile in over 400 SLE patients (as noted above), as well as the same route
of administration as in SLE and similar doses, we believe we can begin the clinical; development of hCDR1 in SS with a Phase 2
trial.
Our second
drug candidate is recombinant human erythropoietin, or rHuEPO, which we have licensed from Yeda Research and Development, or Yeda,
and Mor Research Applications, or Mor, for the extension of survival of patients with advanced/end-stage multiple myeloma. Multiple
myeloma is a severe and incurable malignant hematological cancer of plasma cells.
A clinical observation
confirmed the high success rate of rHuEPO in treating the anemia in patients with multiple myeloma. Six patients with very poor
prognostic features of multiple myeloma, whose expected survival was less than six months continued treatment with rHuEPO beyond
the initial designed 12 week period, and they lived for 45–133 months cumulatively with the multiple myeloma diagnosis and
38–94 months with rHuEPO (with a good quality of life). We were granted an Orphan-drug designation from the FDA in May 2011,
for rHuEPO.
As our focus
is currently on the development of our lead drug candidate, we do not anticipate conducting material research and development
activities for rHuEPO and are currently negotiating the licensing of the rHuEPO to a third party for the purpose of its development.
Our Strategy
Our
objective is to be a leading biopharmaceutical company engaged in the acquisition and development of pharmaceutical products for
the treatment of autoimmune diseases.
Under
our current near-term strategy with respect to our pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical products, subject to receipt of adequate
financing and/or entering into a collaborative agreement, we plan to:
|
·
|
initiate
an international, prospective advanced clinical study intended to assess the safety and
efficacy of hCDR1 when given to patients with SLE;
|
|
·
|
initiate a prospective
Phase 2 study intended to assess the safety and efficacy of hCDR1 when given to patients with pSS;
|
|
·
|
continually build
our pipeline of therapeutic candidates; and
|
|
·
|
develop collaborations
with large pharmaceutical companies to sublicense/develop, and market our hCDR1 and rHuEPO drug development programs.
|
Recent Developments
In February 2017,
we authorized The Bank of New York Mellon, as depository, to effect on February 10, 2017 a change in the ratio from one ADS representing
20 ordinary shares to a new ratio of one ADS representing 100 ordinary shares.
In February 2017,
we entered into security purchase agreements providing for the issuance of an aggregate of 1,000,000 ADSs in a registered direct
offering at $2.50 per ADS for aggregate gross proceeds of $2,500,000. In addition, we issued unregistered warrants to purchase
an aggregate of 1,000,000 ADSs to investors in the offering and unregistered warrants to purchase an aggregate of 50,000,000 ADSs
to the placement agent and affiliates of the placement agent. The warrants may be exercised after six months from issuance and
terminate five and a half years from issuance and have an exercise price of $4.10 per ADS, subject to adjustment as set forth
therein.
In March 2017,
we entered into security purchase agreements providing for the issuance of an aggregate of 1,400,000 ADSs in a private placement
transaction at $2.00 per ADS for aggregate gross proceeds of $2,800,000. In addition, we issued unregistered warrants to purchase
1,400,000 ADSs. The Company agreed to hold a shareholder meeting to increase its authorized ordinary shares to allow for the full
exercise of the warrants (the “Authorized Capital Increase”). The warrants have a term of five and a half years,
an exercise price of $2.30 per ADS and shall be exercisable on the later of the effectiveness of the Authorized Share Increase
or six months following the issuance date. We effected the Authorized Capital Increase on August 3, 2017.
In April 2017,
Alexander Rabinovitch was appointed to our board of directors, Dudu Bassa resigned from our board of directors and David Kestenbaum
resigned as our Chief Financial Officer.
In July 2017, Itay
Weinstein was appointed as our Chief Financial Officer.
In August 2017
our shareholders approved the Authorized Capital Increase, authorizing us to increase our share capital by NIS 75,000,000, such
that following effectiveness of the Authorized Capital Increase, our authorized share capital would be equal to the quotient of
NIS 145,000,000 divided into 1,450,000,000 ordinary shares, par value NIS 0.1 each. As a result, we amended our articles of association
accordingly. Also in August 2017, our shareholders approved the re-appointment of Kesselman & Kesselman, Israel CPAs, a member
firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for
the year ending December 31, 2017, the re-election of Alexander Rabinovitch, Dr. Jonathan Schapiro, Shlomo Shalev, Doron Turgeman
and Dr. Dobroslav Melamed to our board of directors, our new employment agreement with our Chief Executive Officer Joshua Levine,
including the issuance of options to purchase 1,000,000 ordinary shares, and our new compensation policy in accordance with the
requirements of the Israeli Companies Law 5759-1999.
Products Under Development
hCDR1 for the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Market Opportunity
hCDR1
(edratide) is a Phase 2-ready asset for the treatment of SLE, the most prominent type of lupus. SLE is a heterogenous, chronic,
debilitating inflammatory autoimmune disease characterized by the production of an array of autoantibodies, including antibodies
to double-stranded DNA, to other nuclear antigens, and to ribonucleoproteins. Although SLE can affect any part of the body, most
patients experience systemic symptoms including fever, fatigue and malaise along with symptoms in one or only a few organs. The
most common signs and symptoms are arthralgia, arthritis, fatigue, fever, skin rashes, including a characteristic butterfly-shaped
rash across the cheeks and nose, anemia and pleurisy. The clinical course of SLE may also include periods in which few, if any,
symptoms are evident and other times when the disease becomes more active.
According
to research estimates of the Lupus Foundation of America, at least 1.5 million Americans have the disease (more than 5 million
worldwide) with more than 16,000 new cases diagnosed each year in the United States. The Lupus Foundation of America reports that
lupus affects mostly women of childbearing age (15-44). SLE is one of the most common forms of lupus, affecting over 70% of lupus
patients.
SLE
treatment is highly individualized and is based on a patient’s disease severity, organ involvement and previous response.
Mild forms of SLE may be treated with antimalarial medications, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and topical and/or low-dose
glucocorticoids, although treatment with methotrexate may be needed. In addition, low-dose oral steroids or intramuscular injections
of depot steroid preparations can be used for mild disease. More severe cases of SLE may be treated with high-dose glucocorticoids
and immunosuppressive or cytotoxic drugs to suppress the immune system. GlaxoSmithKline’s Benlysta (belimumab), a monoclonal
antibody, is a newer medication that is FDA-approved for patients with mild to moderate SLE currently taking standard therapy
who have not yet experienced an adequate response. Benlysta is the first product to gain marketing approval for patients with
SLE in more than 50 years, paving the way for the introduction of new disease-modifying therapies and reigniting the interest
of pharmaceutical developers in this therapy area. GlaxoSmithKline reported that its 2016 sales of Benlysta were £306 million,
up 19% on the prior year.
Decision
Resources estimates the drug sales for SLE in 2012 were approximately $900 million across the markets covered in its forecast.
By the end of the forecast period of 2022, sales are estimated to grow to $4.0 billion with a CAGR of 16.1%. This growth is expected
to be driven by improved uptake of Benlysta, the introduction of new biological therapies and the overall increase in prevalent
cases of SLE, mainly due to the increasing population in these markets.
hCDR1: General
& Mechanism of Action
hCDR1 is a synthetic
peptide composed of 19 amino-acid residues. It was developed by Teva in collaboration with Prof. Edna Mozes of the Weizmann Institute
of Science, Rehovot, Israel. The sequence of the peptide is based on the complementarity determining region 1 (CDR1) of a pathogenic
human anti-dsDNA mAb that bears the 16/6 idiotype. The idiotype was found to have clinical relevance in SLE patients.
Accumulating
data from
in vivo
and
in vitro
studies demonstrate that hCDR1 functions by inducing regulatory
T cell function through multiple pathways. Administration of hCDR1 to mice has been shown to induce CD4
+
CD25
+
cells
using regulatory and suppressor characteristics such as CD45RB
LOW
, TGF-, CTLA-4 and Foxp3. This induction
suppresses autoreactive CD4
+
cell activation, indicated by the reduced expression of CD69 and Fas ligand;
ultimately, resulting in reduced rates of activation-induced apoptosis. Inhibition by hCDR1-induced CD4
+
CD25
+
cells
is mediated through the immunosuppressive cytokine TGF-. TGF- secretion is up regulated and activated autoreactive cells are decreased;
both are associated with a decrease of pathogenic cytokines such as interferon gamma (IFN-), interleukin-10 (IL-10), interleukin-1
beta (IL-1), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-). Effects on TGF- and Foxp3 have been shown to correlate with a significant
decrease in SLEDAI-2K and BILAG scores in patients treated with hCDR1 in comparison with patients treated with placebo. Another
subset of T cells (CD8
+
CD28
-
) expresses Foxp3 and has been shown to be essential
for the induction and the optimal suppressive function of CD4
+
CD25
+
cells. The function
of hCDR1-induced subsets of regulatory T cells result in the effective suppression, ultimately leading to the modulation of the
underlying aberrancy of the immune system, which culminates in the diminished activity of the disease.
hCDR1
is currently under investigation for its ability to down-regulate the autoimmune response elicited by the pathogenic antibodies
and autoreactive T cells in SLE and up-regulate the expression of gene markers, such as TGF-β and FoxP3. hCDR1 may attenuate
the general SLE-associated autoimmune process and provide effective treatment for many clinical manifestations of SLE. The clinical
development plan is thus designed to demonstrate the efficacy of hCDR1 in the systemic disease.
Clinical Trial
History
Prior
to being licensed to us by Yeda, hCDR1 was licensed to Teva which performed two placebo controlled Phase I trials and a placebo
controlled Phase 2 trial, or the PRELUDE trial. The Phase I and Phase 2 studies consisted of over 400 patients, demonstrating
that hCDR1 is well tolerated by patients and has a favorable safety profile.
The
PRELUDE trial was a 26-week study conducted at 48 centers in 12 countries: Canada, France, Germany, Holland, Hungary, Israel,
Italy, Mexico, Russia, Spain, UK and U.S. enrolling 340 patients with mild to moderate SLE. The PRELUDE trial did not achieve
its primary efficacy endpoint based on the SLEDAI scale, resulting in Teva returning the asset to Yeda in 2009. However, the PRELUDE
trial showed encouraging results in its secondary clinical endpoint, the BILAG index, and, in fact, the 0.5 mg weekly dose showed
a substantial effect. Multiple post-hoc analyses also showed impressive results for this dose using the BILAG index. Such dose
will be the focus of clinical development moving forward. Subsequent to Teva’s return of the program to Yeda, in 2010 the
FDA directed that the primary endpoint in future trials for lupus therapies, including those for hCDR1, should be based on either
the BILAG index or the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index. The FDA has provided the Company with written guidance confirming
the acceptability of BILAG as the primary endpoint in our planned study, subject to receipt of adequate financing.
Planned Clinical
Trial
Given
the FDA’s recommendation and the positive findings from the PRELUDE trial (which showed a substantial effect in the BILAG
index), subject to receipt of adequate financing and/or entry into a collaboration agreement, we intend to initiate a multinational,
randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, multiple dose, parallel group study to assess the efficacy, tolerability and safety
of hCDR1 administered subcutaneously to patients with active SLE. We estimate that the trial will take over one year to enroll
patients, 26 weeks for the treatment phase, and additional time to analyze the results for a total of approximately two years.
We intend to include an interim analysis which will provide a read-out of data prior to the end date of the study.
The
Company submitted a pre-Investigational New Drug (“IND”) meeting package, including a draft protocol for our planned
clinical trial, to the FDA in December 2015. In January 2016, the Company received a written response to its pre-IND meeting package
in which the FDA provided guidance on several key aspects of its proposed clinical trial including: acceptance of the primary
efficacy endpoint to be based on the BILAG index, a measure of lupus disease activity which was the secondary efficacy endpoint
in the PRELUDE trial and confirmation of the appropriate patient population and total number of patients required to prove safety
for a new drug application (NDA) for marketing approval. The FDA recommended that the trial be a Phase 2 study and also provided
additional guidance on other aspects of the trial design including doses and study duration. Based on the FDA’s response,
subject to receipt of adequate financing and/or entry into a collaboration agreement, XTL plans to file its IND, and in the coming
quarters initiate a global clinical trial for hCDR1 in the treatment of SLE.
hCDR1 for the Treatment of Sjogren’s
Syndrome
Market
Opportunity
hCDR1
(Edratide) is a Phase 2-ready asset for the treatment of SS. SS is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease characterized by lymphocytic
infiltration of exocrine glands. Sjogren's syndrome may be an isolated disease, termed primary Sjogren syndrome (pSS) or may accompany
another autoimmune disease, thus termed secondary Sjogren’s syndrome. Clinical presentation varies from mild symptoms such
as classic sicca symptoms of dry eyes (xerophthalmia), dry mouth (xerostomia) and parotid gland enlargements to severe systemic
symptoms involving multiple organ systems such as arthritis, arthralgia, myalgia, pulmonary disease, gastrointestinal disease,
neuropathy and lymphoma.
Similar
to SLE, SS is a heterogenous, chronic, inflammatory autoimmune disease. Some of the autoantibodies characteristic of pSS
occur in SLE as well, including antinuclear antibody (ANA), anti-Ro (also termed anti SSA), anti-La (also termed anti SSB) as
well as rheumatoid factor (RF). Hypergammaglobulinemia is common as well. pSS affects the salivary and lacrimal glands with chronic
inflammation leading to the most common symptoms seen in SS including dry eyes and dry mouth. In addition, SS may affect multiple
systems with clinical manifestations similar to those seen in SLE including fever, fatigue and malaise along with symptoms in
one or only a few organs including arthralgia, arthritis, fatigue, vasculitic rashes, interstitial lung disease, kidney disease
as well as neurologic manifestations.
Disease
prevalence estimations vary from 2.5 million (Global Data Research 2016) to 4 million patients (Sjogren’s Syndrome Fopundation)
in the US alone, with a worldwide estimate of up to 7.7 million in the 7 Major Markets (US, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the
UK and Japan) by the year 2024 (Global Data Research). pSS affects mostly middle aged women (40-50 years of age) with a female
to male prevalence ratio of 9:1 (some estimates even go as far as 20:1). pSS patients have an increased risk of developing non-Hodgkin’s
B cell lymphoma (relative risk of 13.76.)
pSS
treatment is highly individualized and is based on a patient’s disease severity, organ involvement and previous response.
Mild forms of pSS may be treated symptomatically with artificial tears and salivary flow stimulation. Fatigue and arthralgia may
respond to antimalarial medications. More severe, systemic manifestations may be treated with high-dose glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive
or cytotoxic drugs to suppress the immune system.
Global
Data estimates the drug sales for SS in 2014 were approximately $990 million in the US and $1.1 billion across the markets covered
in its forecast. By the end of the forecast period of 2024, sales are estimated to grow to $1.9 billion in the US and $2.2 billion
across the markets covered in its forecast with a Compound Annual Growth Rate of 7.2%. The market size estimate in 2014 includes
Salagen (pilocarpine) and Evoxac (cevimeline), the only two agents to ever be approved for SS, and the use of off-label agents,
such as biologics approved for other autoimmune diseases, and systemic and topical immunosuppressants and corticosteroids. This
growth is expected to be driven by the anticipated approval of Orencia for use in patients with SS in the US and EU in 2021 and
Japan in 2022.
hCDR1:
General & Mechanism of Action
See above discussion
regarding the Mechanism of Action of hCDR1 for SLE.
Since
SS is an autoimmune disease similar to SLE with some autoantibodies and clinical manifestations identical with those detected
in SLE, and since there is no specific treatment for Sjogren’s syndrome, the experiments were undertaken on the Company's
behalf by Professor Edna Mozes of the Weizmann Institute in Israel to determine the ability of hCDR1 to beneficially affect autoimmune
responses related to this disease. To this end, PBMCs obtained from blood samples of pSS patients were incubated in vitro in the
presence of hCDR1 and a control peptide. Following 48 hours of incubation, cells were collected and mRNA was prepared from all
samples. The expression of various genes was determined using real-time PCR. The results obtained to date indicate that in vitro
incubation of PBMCs of pSS patients with hCDR1 resulted in a significant reduction of gene expression of four pathogenic cytokines
known to be involved in SS and lupus (including B-lymphocyte stimulator or BLyS), as well as upregulation of two immunosuppressive
genes, one of which is a marker for activity of regulatory T cells. The vast majority of such effects were previously seen in
similar studies involving lupus patients.
Clinical
Trial History
No
clinical trials with hCDR1 in SS have been performed to date.
Planned
Clinical Trial
As
noted above, hCDR1 has been tested in greater than 400 SLE patients to date. Given its clean safety profile, shown in three different
clinical studies, subject to receipt of adequate financing and/or entry into a collaboration agreement, we will consider whether
to test hCDR1 in a small Phase 2 clinical trial in pSS. The objectives of the study will be to test the safety & efficacy
of different doses of hCDR1 in pSS patients in addition to a control arm. Such study is not being actively considered due to financial
constraints and, therefore, we do not have accurate forecasts regarding the size and duration of such study..
rHuEPO
for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
As
our focus is currently on the development of our lead drug candidate, we do not anticipate conducting material research and development
activities for rHuEPO and are currently negotiating the licensing of the rHuEPO to a third party for the purpose of its development.
Intellectual Property
Patents
General
Patents
and other proprietary rights are very important to the development of our business. We will be able to protect our proprietary
technologies from unauthorized use by third parties only to the extent that our proprietary rights are covered by valid and enforceable
patents or are effectively maintained as trade secrets. We intend to seek and maintain patent and trade secret protection for
our drug candidates and our proprietary technologies. As part of our business strategy, our policy is to file patent applications
in the U.S. and internationally to cover methods of use, new chemical compounds, pharmaceutical compositions and dosing of the
compounds and compositions and improvements in each of these. We also rely on trade secret information, technical know-how, innovation
and agreements with third parties to continuously expand and protect our competitive position. Because of the extensive time required
for development, testing and regulatory review of a potential product, it is possible that before we commercialize any of our
products, any related patent may expire or remain in existence for only a short period following commercialization, thus reducing
any commercial advantage or financial value attributable to the patent.
Generally,
patent applications in the U.S. are maintained in secrecy for a period of at least 18 months. Since publication of discoveries
in the scientific or patent literature often lag behind actual discoveries, we are not certain that we were the first to make
the inventions covered by each of our pending patent applications or that we were the first to file those patent applications.
The patent positions of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies are highly uncertain and involve complex legal and factual
questions. Therefore, we cannot predict the breadth of claims allowed in biotechnology and pharmaceutical patents, or their enforceability.
To date, there has been no consistent policy regarding the breadth of claims allowed in biotechnology patents. Third parties or
competitors may challenge or circumvent our patents or patent applications, if issued. Granted patents can be challenged and ruled
invalid at any time, therefore the grant of a patent is not of itself sufficient to demonstrate our entitlement to a proprietary
right. The disallowance of a claim or invalidation of a patent in any one territory can have adverse commercial consequences in
other territories.
If
our competitors prepare and file patent applications in the U.S. that claim technology also claimed by us, we may choose to challenge
competing patent rights, which could result in substantial cost, even if the eventual outcome is favorable to us. While we have
the right to defend patent rights related to our licensed drug candidates and technologies, we are not obligated to do so. In
the event that we decide to defend our licensed patent rights, we will be obligated to cover all of the expenses associated with
that effort.
If
a patent is issued to a third party containing one or more preclusive or conflicting claims, and those claims are ultimately determined
to be valid and enforceable, we may be required to obtain a license under such patent or to develop or obtain alternative technology.
In the event of a litigation involving a third party claim, an adverse outcome in the litigation could subject us to significant
liabilities to such third party, require us to seek a license for the disputed rights from such third party, and/or require us
to cease use of the technology. Further, our breach of an existing license or failure to obtain a license to technology required
to commercialize our products may seriously harm our business. We also may need to commence litigation to enforce any patents
issued to us or to determine the scope, validity and/or enforceability of third-party proprietary rights. Litigation would involve
substantial costs.
hCDR1
for the Treatment of SLE and SS
We
have exclusively licensed from Yeda, two families of patents relating to hCDR1.
|
·
|
A
basic patent family entitled “Synthetic Human Peptides and Pharmaceutical Compositions
Comprising Them” for the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus” that
covers the active pharmaceutical agent, the Edratide peptide. The patent has been granted
in a large number of jurisdictions: U.S., Europe (Austria, Denmark, Finland, France,
Germany, Ireland, Italy, Liechtenstein, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, The Netherlands and
the UK), Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, India, Israel, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Norway, Hungary
and Russia. The patent expires on February 26, 2022 except in the case of the U.S., which
expires on September 22, 2022.
|
|
·
|
A patent family
for the formulation entitled “Parenteral Formulations of Peptides for the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus”
that covers a very specific pharmaceutical composition comprising Edratide. It has been granted in the U.S., Europe (Switzerland,
Germany, Denmark, Spain, Finland, France, Great Britain, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands and Sweden), China, India, Israel, Japan,
and Mexico, and is allowed in Canada. The patent expires on January 14, 2024.
|
|
|
Two patent applications
for specific treatment regimens were filed in the U.S. on August 10, 2017 and three provisional patent applications for treatment
of Sjögren's syndrome were filed on January 5, 2017, April 5, 2017 and September 12, 2017.
|
rHuEPO
for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
We
have exclusively licensed from Yeda and Mor a family of patents relating to rHuEPO.
|
·
|
A main use patent
entitled “Use of Erythropoietin in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma that covers the active pharmaceutical agent, EPO.
The main claims of this patent is directed to a method for the treatment of a multiple myeloma patient, comprising the administration
of Erythropoietin or Recombinant Human Erythropoietin, for the inhibition of tumor growth, triggering of tumor regression
or inhibition of multiple myeloma cell metastasis in the said patient. The patent was granted in the United States, Europe
(Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Great Britain, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland), Israel, Japan,
Hong Kong and Canada. The issued patent will expire on March 30, 2019.
|
Other
Intellectual Property Rights
We depend upon trademarks,
trade secrets, know-how and continuing technological advances to develop and maintain our competitive position. To maintain the
confidentiality of trade secrets and proprietary information, we require our employees, scientific advisors, consultants and collaborators,
upon commencement of a relationship with us, to execute confidentiality agreements and, in the case of parties other than our
research and development collaborators, to agree to assign their inventions to us. These agreements are designed to protect our
proprietary information and to grant us ownership of technologies that are developed in connection with their relationship with
us. These agreements may not, however, provide protection for our trade secrets in the event of unauthorized disclosure of such
information.
Licensing
Agreements and Collaborations
hCDR1
On January 7, 2014,
we entered into a license agreement with Yeda, as amended on September 6, 2015, which grants us the exclusive worldwide right
to research, develop, and commercialize hCDR1 for all indications. Yeda is the commercial arm of the Weizmann Institute of Science.
In consideration,
we are responsible for a patent expense reimbursement to Yeda in six installments totaling $382,989. On May 14, 2014, we issued
222,605 of our ordinary shares to Yeda, as the first of six installments, representing a value of approximately $38,000. On January
21, 2015, we issued a further 802,912 of our ordinary shares to Yeda as the second of six installments, representing a value of
approximately $84,000. The remaining installments of approximately $64,000 each, payable in cash, are due every six months commencing
on July 1, 2015, with the final payment due on January 1, 2017. In July 2016, the Company and Yeda signed a second amendment to
the license agreement whereby, the final two payments due under the Agreement will be made on April 7, 2017, provided that if
we receive funding of at least $5,000,000 then we shall be required to promptly pay Yeda any unpaid patent expense reimbursement
in one lump-sum cash payment. To this date the patent expenses were incurred but not yet paid and the Company and Yeda are currently
negotiating further amendment to the payment scheme under the license agreement.
Under the license
agreement, we are required to make milestone payments of up to $2.2 million: $200,000 upon starting a Phase 3 clinical trial,
$1 million upon FDA approval to market in the U.S., and $250,000 for marketing approval in each of China and three of the European
Union’s Group of Five. In addition, we are required to pay 2-3% royalties of annual net sales and sublicense fees of 15-20%
of whatever we receive from any sub-licensee. Under the license agreement, we are also required to meet certain development milestones
including the delivery of a trial protocol to Yeda by January 1, 2016 (which we delivered), receipt of investment of at least
$5 million by August 1, 2016 (of which $4 million was received in April 2015) and commencement of a Phase II clinical trial by
January 1, 2017. In subsequent amendments signed between the Company and Yeda, the parties agreed to postpone the last two installments
of the patent expense reimbursement until April 7, 2017, receipt of the remainder of the required $5 million investment by May
1, 2017 and commencement of a Phase 2 clinical trial in respect of hCDR1 by October 1, 2017. To this date the Company and Yeda
are currently negotiating further amendment to the payment scheme under the license agreement.
The term of the license
agreement is the later of the date of expiry of the last of the licensed patents or the expiry of a continuous period of 11 years
after first commercial sale in any country during which there shall not have been a first commercial sale in the U.S., EU, Japan,
China or any OECD member. The license agreement may be terminated by us without cause upon 60 days prior written notice. The license
agreement may also be terminated by Yeda if either we fail to meet certain development milestones or commercial sale shall have
commenced and there shall be a period of 6 months of no sales, subject to certain exceptions. Yeda shall also be entitled to terminate
the license agreement if we were to commence legal action against Yeda challenging the validity of any of the licensed patents,
and we were unsuccessful in such challenge, in which event we would be required to pay to Yeda liquidated damages of $8 million.
Either party may also terminate the license agreement in the case of a material breach that remains uncured or certain bankruptcy
events.
rHuEPO
In August 2010 we
acquired from Bio-Gal, the rights to develop rHuEPO for the treatment of multiple myeloma under a research and license agreement
with Yeda and Mor. Bio-Gal had previously performed certain research and development studies under the research and license agreement.
Mor is the Israeli corporation and licensing arm of Kupat Holim Clalit, one of the largest HMOs in Israel.
We are obligated
to pay 1% royalties on net sales of the product, as well as a fixed royalty payment in the total amount of $350,000 upon the successful
completion of Phase 2. Such payment of $350,000 is payable to Yeda upon the earlier of (i) six months from the successful completion
of Phase 2 or (ii) the completion of a successful fundraising by XTL at any time after the completion of the Phase 2 of at least
$2 million. The Company is currently negotiating the licensing of the rHuEPO to a third party.
Competition
Competition
in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries is intense. Our competitors include pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology
companies, as well as universities and public and private research institutions. In addition, companies that are active in different
but related fields represent substantial competition for us. Many of our competitors have significantly greater capital resources,
larger research and development staffs and facilities and greater experience in drug development, regulation, manufacturing and
marketing than we do. These organizations also compete with us to recruit qualified personnel, attract partners for joint ventures
or other collaborations, and license technologies that are competitive with ours. To compete successfully in this industry we
must identify novel and unique drugs or methods of treatment and then complete the development of those drugs as treatments in
advance of our competitors.
The
drugs that we are attempting to develop will have to compete with existing therapies. In addition, a large number of companies
are pursuing the development of pharmaceuticals that target the same diseases and conditions that we are targeting. Other companies
have products or drug candidates in various stages of pre-clinical or clinical development to treat diseases for which we are
also seeking to discover and develop drug candidates. Some of these potential competing drugs are further advanced in development
than our drug candidates and may be commercialized earlier.
Competing
Products for Treatment of SLE
There
is only one drug that has been approved for SLE in the last 50 years, GlaxoSmithKline’s Benlysta (belimumab) which was approved
in 2011. Other current therapies include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, anti-malarials and immunosuppressants.
Corticosteroids and immunosuppressants lead to broad, non-selective immunosuppression often associated with significant adverse
events. In addition these therapies are not effective in all SLE patients.
Despite
initial enthusiasm following approval of Benlysta as the first drug approved for SLE with a selective target, it has been approved
to date only in patients with mild to moderate disease, without active renal or CNS disease, its onset of action is slow and sales
have been lower than expected. Additional drugs are being evaluated or developed to treat SLE including, among others, anifrolumab
developed by MedImmune, blisibimod developed by Anthera Pharmaceuticals, forigerimod acetate (lupuzor) developed by Immupharma,
abatacept developed by Bristol-Myers Squibb, ACT-334441 developed by Actelion, atacicept developed by Merck Serono, CC-220 developed
by Celgene, and INV-103 being developed by Invion. In the past eighteen months, there have been two late stage drugs, tabalumab
developed by Eli Lilly and epratuzumab developed by UCB/Immunomedics, for the treatment of SLE which have both failed to meet
the primary endpoint in Phase 3 trials.
Competing
Products for Treatment of pSS
No
specific drug has been approved for pSS so far apart from the symptomatic relief of signs and symptoms with the use of cholinergic
agonists e.g. Salagen (pilocarpine) and Evoxac (cevilemine). Immunomodulatory treatments, usually for extra-glandular disease,
which may be used include cyclosporine (ocular inflammation), hydroxychloroquine (mild inflammatory symptoms of joints, muscles
& skin), corticosteroids (rare but serious symptoms: vasculitic rash, interstitial lung disease, interstitial nephritis, glomerulonephritis),
immunosuppressive agents e.g. methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide (used to treat serious internal organ manifestations)
and biologic agents e.g. rituximab. Corticosteroids and immunosuppressants lead to broad, non-selective immunosuppression often
associated with significant adverse events.
The pipeline of
drugs in development for the indication of SS is relatively small with only one product in Phase 3, Orencia (abatacept), being
developed by Bristol-Myers Squibb, and a number of drugs in Phase 1 or 2 stages of development including AMG/MEDI5872 developed
by Amgen, BIIB063 developed by Biogen, CFZ533 and VAY736 developed by Novartis, GSK618960 developed by GSK, LY3090106 developed
by Eli Lilly, MEDI4920 developed by MedImmune, RG7625 developed by Roche, RSLV developed by Resolve Therapeutics and Actemra (tocilizumab)
developed by the University Hospital of Strasbourg. In addition, there is an ongoing Phase 2 combination study combining Benlysta
(belimumab) and Rituxan (rituximab).
Seasonality
Our business and operations
are generally not affected by seasonal fluctuations or factors.
Raw Materials and Suppliers
We believe that the
raw materials that we require to manufacture hCDR1 and rHuEPO are widely available from numerous suppliers and are generally considered
to be generic industrial chemical supplies. We do not rely on a single or unique supplier for the current production of any therapeutic
small molecule in our pipeline.
Manufacturing
We currently have
no manufacturing capabilities and do not intend to establish any such capabilities.
With
respect to our drug candidate, hCDR1, we believe that we will be able to outsource production to a contract manufacturer in order
to obtain sufficient inventory to satisfy the clinical supply needs for our future development for the treatment of SLE and SS.
With respect to our drug candidate rHuEPO, we believe that we will either be able to purchase rHuEPO from existing pharmaceutical
companies or to enter into collaborative agreements with contract manufacturers or other third-parties.
At
the time of commercial sale, to the extent that it is possible and commercially practicable, we plan to engage a back-up supplier
for each of our product candidates. Until such time, we expect that we will rely on a single contract manufacturer to produce
each of our product candidates under cGMP regulations. Our third-party manufacturers have a limited number of facilities in which
our product candidates can be produced and will have limited experience in manufacturing our product candidates in quantities
sufficient for conducting clinical trials or for commercialization. Our third-party manufacturers will have other clients and
may have other priorities that could affect our contractor’s ability to perform the work satisfactorily and/or on a timely
basis. Both of these occurrences would be beyond our control. We anticipate that we will similarly rely on contract manufacturers
for our future proprietary product candidates.
We
expect to similarly rely on contract manufacturing relationships for any products that we may in-license or acquire in the future.
However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully contract with such manufacturers on terms acceptable to
us, or at all.
Contract
manufacturers are subject to ongoing periodic inspections by the FDA, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency and corresponding state
and local agencies to ensure strict compliance with cGMP and other state and federal regulations. We do not have control over
third-party manufacturers’ compliance with these regulations and standards, other than through contractual obligations.
If
we need to change manufacturers, the FDA and corresponding foreign regulatory agencies must approve these new manufacturers in
advance, which will involve testing and additional inspections to ensure compliance with FDA regulations and standards and may
require significant lead times and delay. Furthermore, switching manufacturers may be difficult because the number of potential
manufacturers is limited. It may be difficult or impossible for us to find a replacement manufacturer quickly or on terms acceptable
to us, or at all.
Environmental Matters
We may from time to
time be subject to various environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing air emissions, water
and wastewater discharges, noise emissions, the use, management and disposal of hazardous, radioactive and biological materials
and wastes and the cleanup of contaminated sites. We believe that our business, operations and facilities are being operated in
compliance in all material respects with applicable environmental and health and safety laws and regulations. Based on information
currently available to us, we do not expect environmental costs and contingencies to have a material adverse effect on us. The
operation of our testing facilities, however, entails risks in these areas. Significant expenditures could be required in the
future if these facilities are required to comply with new or more stringent environmental or health and safety laws, regulations
or requirements.
Government and Industry Regulation
Numerous governmental
authorities, principally the FDA and corresponding state and foreign regulatory agencies, impose substantial regulations upon
the clinical development, manufacture and marketing of our drug candidates and technologies, as well as our ongoing research and
development activities. None of our drug candidates have been approved for sale in any market in which we have marketing rights.
Before marketing in the U.S., any drug that we develop must undergo rigorous pre-clinical testing and clinical trials and an extensive
regulatory approval process implemented by the FDA, under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938, as amended. The FDA
regulates, among other things, the pre-clinical and clinical testing, safety, efficacy, approval, manufacturing, record keeping,
adverse event reporting, packaging, labeling, storage, advertising, promotion, export, sale and distribution of biopharmaceutical
products.
The
regulatory review and approval process is lengthy, expensive and uncertain. We are required to submit extensive pre-clinical and
clinical data and supporting information to the FDA for each indication or use to establish a drug candidate’s safety and
efficacy before we can secure FDA approval. The approval process takes many years, requires the expenditure of substantial resources
and may involve ongoing requirements for post-marketing studies or surveillance. According to the FDA, before commencing clinical
trials in humans, we must submit an IND to the FDA containing, among other things, pre-clinical data, chemistry, manufacturing
and control information, and an investigative plan. Our submission of an IND may not result in FDA authorization to commence a
clinical trial.
We
were granted an Orphan-drug designation from the FDA in May 2011, for rHuEPO. In the U.S., Orphan-drug designation is granted
by the FDA Office of Orphan Drug Products to novel drugs or biologics that treat a rare disease or condition affecting fewer than
200,000 patients in the U.S.. The designation provides the drug developer with a seven-year period of U.S. marketing exclusivity
if the drug is the first of its type approved for the specified indication or if it demonstrates superior safety, efficacy, or
a major contribution to patient care versus another drug of its type previously granted the designation for the same indication,
as well as with tax credits for clinical research costs, the ability to apply for annual grant funding, clinical research trial
design assistance and waiver of Prescription Drug User Fee Act filing fees.
We
may apply to the European Medicines Agency in order to obtain Orphan-drug designation for its Recombinant Erythropoietin in Europe.
Orphan designation is granted by the European Medicines Agency, following a positive opinion from the Committee for Orphan Medicinal
Products, to a medicinal product that is intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a life-threatening or a chronically
debilitating condition affecting not more than five in 10,000 persons in the European Community when the application for designation
is submitted. Orphan drug designation provides the sponsor with access to the Centralized Procedure for the application for marketing
authorization, protocol assistance, up to a 100% reduction in fees related to a marketing authorization application, pre-authorization
inspection and post-authorization activities, and could provide ten years of market exclusivity in the EU, once approved for the
treatment of Multiple Myeloma.
The
FDA may permit expedited development, evaluation, and marketing of new therapies intended to treat persons with serious or life-threatening
conditions for which there is an unmet medical need under its fast track drug development programs. A sponsor can apply for fast
track designation at the time of submission of an IND, or at any time prior to receiving marketing approval of the NDA. To receive
fast track designation, an applicant must demonstrate that the drug:
|
·
|
is
intended to treat a serious or life-threatening condition;
|
|
·
|
is intended to treat
a serious aspect of the condition; and
|
|
·
|
has the potential
to address unmet medical needs, and this potential is being evaluated in the planned drug development program.
|
Clinical
testing must meet requirements for institutional review board oversight, informed consent and good clinical practices, and must
be conducted pursuant to an IND, unless exempted.
For
purposes of NDA approval, clinical trials are typically conducted in the following sequential phases:
|
·
|
Phase 1: The drug
is administered to a small group of humans, either healthy volunteers or patients, to test for safety, dosage tolerance, absorption,
metabolism, excretion, and clinical pharmacology.
|
|
·
|
Phase 2: Studies
are conducted on a larger number of patients to assess the efficacy of the product, to ascertain dose tolerance and the optimal
dose range, and to gather additional data relating to safety and potential adverse events.
|
|
·
|
Phase 3: Studies
establish safety and efficacy in an expanded patient population.
|
|
·
|
Phase 4: The FDA
may require Phase 4 post-marketing studies to find out more about the drug’s long-term risks, benefits, and optimal
use, or to test the drug in different populations, such as children.
|
The
length of time necessary to complete clinical trials varies significantly and may be difficult to predict. Clinical results are
frequently susceptible to varying interpretations that may delay, limit or prevent regulatory approvals. Additional factors that
can cause delay or termination of our clinical trials, or that may increase the costs of these trials, include:
|
·
|
slow patient enrollment
due to the nature of the clinical trial plan, the proximity of patients to clinical sites, the eligibility criteria for participation
in the study or other factors, and the number of sites participating in the trial;
|
|
·
|
inadequately trained
or insufficient personnel at the study site to assist in overseeing and monitoring clinical trials or delays in approvals
from a study site’s review board;
|
|
·
|
longer treatment
time required to demonstrate efficacy or determine the appropriate product dose;
|
|
·
|
insufficient supply
of the drug candidates;
|
|
·
|
adverse medical
events or side effects in treated patients; and
|
|
·
|
ineffectiveness
of the drug candidates.
|
In
addition, the FDA may place a clinical trial on hold or terminate it if it concludes that subjects are being exposed to an unacceptable
health risk. Any drug is likely to produce some toxicity or undesirable side effects when administered at sufficiently high doses
and/or for a sufficiently long period of time. Unacceptable toxicity or side effects may occur at any dose level at any time in
the course of studies designed to identify unacceptable effects of a drug candidate, known as toxicological studies, or clinical
trials of drug candidates. The appearance of any unacceptable toxicity or side effect could bring us or regulatory authorities
to interrupt, limit, delay or abort the development of any of our drug candidates and could ultimately prevent approval by the
FDA or foreign regulatory authorities for any or all targeted indications.
Before
receiving FDA approval to market a product, we must demonstrate that the product is safe and effective for its intended use by
submitting to the FDA an NDA containing the pre-clinical and clinical data that have been accumulated, together with chemistry
and manufacturing and controls specifications and information, and proposed labeling, among other things. The FDA may refuse to
accept an NDA for filing if certain content criteria are not met and, even after accepting an NDA, the FDA may often require additional
information, including clinical data, before approval of marketing a product.
As
part of the approval process, the FDA must inspect and approve each manufacturing facility. Among the conditions of approval is
the requirement that a manufacturer’s quality control and manufacturing procedures conform to cGMP. Manufacturers must expend
time, money and effort to ensure compliance with cGMP, and the FDA conducts periodic inspections to certify compliance. It may
be difficult for our manufacturers or us to comply with the applicable cGMP and other FDA regulatory requirements. If we or our
contract manufacturers fail to comply, then the FDA will not allow us to market products that have been affected by the failure.
If
the FDA grants approval, the approval will be limited to those disease states, conditions and patient populations for which the
product is safe and effective, as demonstrated through clinical studies. Further, a product may be marketed only in those dosage
forms and for those indications approved in the NDA. Certain changes to an approved NDA, including, with certain exceptions, any
changes to labeling, require approval of a supplemental application before the drug may be marketed as changed. Any products that
we manufacture or distribute pursuant to FDA approvals are subject to continuing regulation by the FDA, including compliance with
cGMP and the reporting of adverse experiences with the drugs. The nature of marketing claims that the FDA will permit us to make
in the labeling and advertising of our products will be limited to those specified in an FDA approval, and the advertising of
our products will be subject to comprehensive regulation by the FDA. Claims exceeding those that are approved will constitute
a violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or regulatory
requirements at any time during the product development process, approval process, or after approval may result in agency enforcement
actions, including withdrawal of approval, recall, seizure of products, injunctions, fines and/or civil or criminal penalties.
Any agency enforcement action could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Should
we wish to market our products in countries other than the U.S., we must receive marketing authorization from the appropriate
regulatory authorities. The requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, marketing authorization, pricing and reimbursement
vary widely from country to country. At present, companies are typically required to apply for foreign marketing authorizations
at a national level. However, within the EU, registration procedures are available to companies wishing to market a product in
more than one EU member state. Typically, if the regulatory authority is satisfied that a company has presented adequate evidence
of safety, quality and efficacy, then the regulatory authority will grant a marketing authorization. This regulatory approval
process, however, involves risks similar or identical to the risks associated with FDA approval discussed above, and therefore
we cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain the appropriate marketing authorization for any product in any particular country.
Our current development strategy calls for us to seek marketing authorization for our drug candidates in countries other than
the United States.
Failure
to comply with applicable laws and regulations would likely have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, laws
and regulations regarding the manufacture and sale of new drugs are subject to future changes. We cannot predict the likelihood,
nature, effect or extent of adverse governmental regulation that might arise from future legislative or administrative action.
Property, Plant and Equipment
We entered into
an agreement to lease offices in Herzlia, Israel in November 2017 for an initial lease term of 12 months. We have the option to
extend the lease term as early as sixty (60) days prior to the expiration of the lease agreement. In addition, we have the ability
to terminate the lease during its term or extended term, as the case may be and for any reason, without limitation, by providing
a 60 days prior written notice.
To our knowledge,
there are no environmental issues that affect our use of the properties that we lease.
Employees
As of January 9,
2018, we have one part-time employee, our Chief Executive Officer, and five part-time service providers. We and our Israeli employees
are subject, by an extension order of the Israeli Ministry of Welfare, to certain provisions of collective bargaining agreements
between the Histadrut, the General Federation of Labor Unions in Israel and the Coordination Bureau of Economic Organizations,
including the Industrialists Associations. Our part-time service providers are not subject to these collective bargaining agreements.
These provisions principally address cost of living increases, recreation pay, travel expenses, vacation pay and other conditions
of employment. We provide our employees with benefits and working conditions equal to or above the required minimum. Other than
those provisions, our employees are not represented by a labor union.
Historical Background and Corporate
Structure
Our
legal and commercial name is XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. We were established as a private company limited by shares under the
laws of the State of Israel on March 9, 1993, under the name Xenograft Technologies Ltd. We re-registered as a public company
on June 7, 1993, in Israel, and changed our name to XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. on July 3, 1995.
We
commenced operations to use and commercialize technology developed at the Weizmann Institute, in Rehovot, Israel. Since 1993 we
pursued therapeutic and pharmaceutical development programs for the treatment of a variety of indications including hepatitis
B, hepatitis C, diabetic neuropathic pain, schizophrenia, SLE and multiple myeloma, most of which have terminated. Our current
drug development program is currently focused on the treatment of SLE and multiple myeloma.
We
currently have one subsidiary, Xtepo Ltd., a private company limited by shares under the laws of the State of Israel which holds
a license for the exclusive use of rHuEPO for the treatment of multiple myeloma. As of January 2018, we hold approximately 3.78%
of the issued and outstanding share capital of InterCure Ltd., a now former subsidiary of ours.
The
ADSs are listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “XTLB.” Our ordinary shares are traded on
the TASE under the symbol “XTLB.” We operate under the laws of the State of Israel under the Israeli Companies Law,
and in the U.S., the Securities Act and the Exchange Act.
Our
principal offices are located at 5 Badner St., Ramat Gan 5218102, Israel, and our telephone number is (972) 3-6116600. Our primary
internet address is www.xtlbio.com. None of the information on our website is incorporated by reference herein.
MANAGEMENT
Directors and Senior Management.
The following table
sets forth the members of our senior management and board of directors:
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
Shlomo Shalev
|
|
56
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
Osnat Hillel Fain
|
|
52
|
|
Non-Executive and External Director
|
Oded Nagar
|
|
49
|
|
Non-Executive and External Director
|
Alexander Rabinovich
|
|
47
|
|
Non-Executive Director
|
Doron Turgeman
|
|
49
|
|
Non-Executive Director
|
Dr. Jonathan Schapiro
|
|
57
|
|
Non-Executive Director
|
Dr. Dobroslav Melamed
|
|
40
|
|
Non-Executive Director
|
Josh Levine
|
|
53
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
Itay Weinstein
|
|
46
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Shlomo Shalev
joined our Board of Directors in December 2014 and in August 2015 was appointed to serve as interim Chairman. He most
recently served as Chairman of the Board of Micronet, a TASE listed company. In addition to serving as a board member on a number
of NASDAQ and TASE listed companies, such as OphirOptronics, Arel Communications and PowerDsine, Mr. Shalev was the Senior Vice
President of Investments for Ampal. He has also worked on a number of transactions in mergers and acquisitions and initial public
offerings. With an educational background in economics, Mr. Shalev was Israel’s Consul for Economic Affairs and the Economic
Advisor to the Director General, Ministry of Industry and Trade. Mr. Shalev holds an MBA from the University of San Francisco
and a B.A. degree in Economics from the University of Ben Gurion, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Osnat Hillel
Fain
joined our Board of Directors in March 2015. She most recently served as Founder, Director and Managing Partner of
Newton Propulsion Technologies LTD. In addition to serving as a board member on a number of TASE listed companies, including First
ET View LTD, Priortech LTD, Aran R&D (1982) LTD, LeumiStart Fund and SDS LTD, Ms. Fain was the Business Development Manager
at Giora Eiland Ltd., a representative of The Cheyne Capital Group in Israel, CEO of InterVision, Co-manager of the Aran Medical
Ventures hedge fund, Marketing Manager at Datasphere Ltd. and an independent marketing consultant for TCB. She earned an Executive
MBA and a BA in Humanities at Tel Aviv University and completed a one year course in Management at the Tel Aviv campus of the
College of Management.
Oded Nagar
joined our Board of Directors in March 2015. He currently serves as CEO and Owner of ABC – Advance Business Consulting Ltd,
as the CEO of Galaxy Properties and Real Estate LTD and as a board member of Bunkersec Ltd. In addition to serving as a board
member on a number of TASE listed companies, including IDB Development LTD, Gamatronic Electronic Industries LTD and Biri-Barashi
Ltd., Mr. Nagar was the CEO and Founder of Pretium Group LTD/Pretium Renewable Energy LTD, VP Finance and Operations at Matrix
IT (Formula Group) and the CFO of Bashan Systems (Formula Group). Previously, Oded worked in the Department of the General Controller
at the Ministry of Finance in Israel, as an accountant at KPMG Israel and as an Economist at Bank Leumi. He earned an MBA in Finance
and Banking and Information Systems and a BA in Accounting and Economics from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Mr. Nagar is
also a Certified Public Accountant in Israel.
Alexander
Rabinovich
joined our Board of Directors in April 2017. He has significant public company experience with both NASDAQ
and TASE listed companies. Mr. Rabinovich is currently the Chief Executive Officer and director of Green Forest Holdings Ltd.,
a fully owned company engaged in capital investments. He served as director in Pilat Media Global PLC, public company listed on
TASE and on the Alternative Investment Market of the London Stock Exchange and several other private companies such as Visualety
Systems Ltd. Mr. Rabinovich holds a B.A. degree in Economics and Accounting from the University of Haifa.
Doron Turgeman
joined our Board of Directors in December 2014. He has significant public company experience with both NASDAQ and TASE
listed companies. Mr. Turgeman is currently the Chief Executive Officer of B Communications (BCOM) and Internet Gold (IGLD), both
of which are listed on the NASDAQ. He has gained considerable experience in mergers and acquisitions involving both debt and equity,
with, among other things, the purchase of the controlling interest of Bezeq by B Communications. He is knowledgeable in capital
markets in Israel, the U.S. and Europe as well as SEC and TASE reporting standards. Throughout his career, he has proved to be
a strong manager and has developed close relationships with key constituents throughout the industry .Mr. Turgeman holds a B.A.
degree in Economics and Accounting from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and is a certified public accountant in Israel.
Dr. Jonathan
Schapiro
joined our Board of Directors in December 2014. He is currently an Adjunct Clinical Assistant Professor in the
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine at Stanford University School of Medicine and
a Director of HIV/AIDS at the National Hemophilia Center at Sheba Medical Center in Tel-Aviv, Israel. He has served as a committee
member on the United States Food and Drug Administration Antiviral Drugs Advisory Committee and is a member of the World Health
Organization Global HIV Drug Resistance Network Steering Group. Dr. Schapiro is on the organizing and scientific committee of
international conferences on antiviral drug development, clinical pharmacology and resistance, as well as contributing to guidelines
publications. His research has appeared in major journals such as Lancet and Annals of Internal Medicine. He has served on the
scientific advisory boards of major pharmaceutical and molecular diagnostic companies and has been involved in the development
of multiple antiviral drugs over the last 20 years. Dr. Schapiro has devoted his career to HIV clinical care, research and education
since completing his Fellowship in Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine at Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford
CA. He graduated from the Ben Gurion University School of Medicine and completed his Medical Residency at the Rabin Medical Center
in Israel.
Dr. Dobroslav
Melamed
joined our Board of Directors in December 2014. He is a biotech entrepreneur with over 10 years of experience
in the life science industry. He has demonstrated success in taking drugs from the lab to the shelf by identifying target markets,
planning regulatory strategy, raising capital, executing successful clinical trials and scaling up to commercial production. He
is currently establishing two companies involved in the development of a treatment for Ebola and novel drug delivery. Until September
2014, he was the President of SciVac (formerly SciGen IL), a high growth biopharmaceutical company that develops, manufactures
and markets recombinant human health care biotechnology derived products, including vaccines. Dr. Melamed was responsible for
SciVac’s operations, clinical trials and new business. Dr. Melamed is the co-founder of Periness LTD, a developer of new
drugs for male infertility and Oshadi LTD, a developer of oral carriers for proteins like insulin. He has also been a researcher
at Bar-Ilan University’s Male Fertility clinic, where he assisted in the development of new drugs for male infertility;
and QBI, where he worked in the Pre-clinical and Research Pharmacology Department establishing In-Vivo models for drug discovery
and delivery. Dr. Melamed earned a PhD in Biotechnology and a Bachelor of Arts degree in Biotechnology from the Bar-Ilan University,
Israel.
Josh Levine
was appointed our Chief Executive Officer in October 2013. Mr. Levine was the Chief Executive Officer of Proteologics
Ltd. (TASE: PRTL) from January 2011 until October 2013. Previously, from September 2008 until September 2010, he was Chairman
of the Board of Proteologics Ltd. Concurrently, he was Senior Director at Teva Innovative Ventures responsible for, among other
things, business development as well as alliance management for the unit. He had also held several executive positions within
venture capital funds and boutique investment banks. Previously, he was a corporate attorney at a large New York City law firm.
Mr. Levine holds a JD degree from Columbia University Law School and a BA degree in Chemistry from Yeshiva University.
Itay Weinstein
was appointed our Chief Financial Officer in July, 2017. Mr. Itay Weinstein is a Partner at Shimony C.P.A. and has been
employed there since 1999. Mr. Weinstein served as the Controller of Can-Fite BioPharma Ltd. since 2003 and as the Chief Financial
Officer of Ophthalix Inc. from November 2011 through November 2017. Prior to joining Shimony C.P.A, Mr. Weinstein served as an
auditor at Oren Horowitz. Mr. Weinstein holds a B.A. in economics and accounting from the Tel Aviv University, Israel, and has
been a licensed CPA since 1999. Mr. Weinstein is also a board member of Uno Management and Consulting Ltd.
Compensation
The
aggregate compensation paid by us to all persons who served as directors or officers for the year 2017 (10 persons) was approximately
$415,000-. This amount includes payments of approximately $31,000 made for social security, pension, disability insurance and
health insurance premiums, severance accruals, payments made in lieu of statutory severance, payments for continuing education
plans and payments made for the redemption of accrued vacation.
The
aggregate compensation paid by us to all persons who served as directors or officers for the year 2016 (10 persons) was approximately
$552,000. This amount includes payments of approximately $37,000 made for social security, pension, disability insurance and health
insurance premiums, severance accruals, payments made in lieu of statutory severance, payments for continuing education plans
and payments made for the redemption of accrued vacation.
In accordance with
the requirements of Israeli Law, we determine our directors’ compensation in the following manner:
|
·
|
first, our compensation
committee reviews the proposal for compensation.
|
|
·
|
second, provided
that the compensation committee approves the proposed compensation, the proposal is then submitted to our Board of Directors
for review, except that a director who is the beneficiary of the proposed compensation does not participate in any discussion
or voting with respect to such proposal; and
|
|
·
|
finally, if our
Board of Directors approves the proposal, it must then submit its recommendation to our shareholders, which is usually done
in connection with our shareholders’ general meeting.
|
The approval of a
majority of the shareholders voting at a duly convened shareholders meeting is required to implement any such compensation proposal.
Employment and Service Agreements
Joshua Levine
On August 3, 2017,
we entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Levine, our Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, effective as of June 14, 2017
(Effective Date”). This agreement replaced our prior agreement with Mr. Levine originally entered into in September 2013.
Under the terms of the new agreement, Mr. Levine shall be employed at a 50% to 100% capacity and is entitled to a gross monthly
salary of NIS 40,000, which shall be adjusted at a pro rata basis if he is engaged at below 100% capacity. As of June 11, 2017,
and through the date of this prospectus, Mr. Levine was engaged at 50% capacity. All ancillary benefits derived from the monthly
salary shall be adjusted on a pro rata basis to his level of engagement. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Levine was issued
options to purchase 1,000,000 ordinary shares at an exercise price of NIS 0.11. The options shall vest on a quarterly basis over
36 months, such that one-third of the options shall vest within 12 months of the effective date of the agreement and thereafter
1/12 of the options shall vest on the last day of each three month period, provided that on such date Mr. Levine is still employed
by the Company. All vested options shall remain exercisable for a period of 12 months from the end or termination of the agreement.
The employment agreement also provides that Mr. Levine will be entitled to benefits such as convalescence pay, managers’
insurance, a study fund and a company car. The agreement may be terminated by the Company or Mr. Levine without cause, subject
to each party giving the other party four months advance written notice. Following delivery of the notice, Mr. Levine shall be
entitled to four months of base salary and an additional adaptation fee to compensate him as if he were working on a full time
basis through the notice period. Mr. Levine, or his estate, shall receive four months of salary, as was actually paid, following
termination for disability or death. In the event of a transaction with a third party regarding the Company’s lupus property
and/or HCDR1 product, alone or as part of a combination therapy for any indication (sale / cooperation / joint trial) provided
that on such date Mr. Levine is employed by the Company, he shall be entitled to a onetime cash bonus of NIS 180,000 and the options
issued to him in connection with this agreement June 2017 shall vest immediately. Upon its approval by the Company's shareholders
obtained on August 3, 2017, the agreement became effective as of the Effective Date and shall remain in effect until terminated
by either party subject to a 4 months prior written notice.
On September 11,
2013, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Levine, and amended this agreement on January 30, 2014. The agreement became
effective upon approval by the shareholders on March 17, 2014. Pursuant to the prior agreement, he was entitled to a monthly gross
base salary of NIS 40,000 (NIS 480,000 annually). The employment agreement provided that upon the successful completion of cash
fund raising of at least $3 million in a public offering or private placement of equity securities, including securities convertible
or exercisable into equity of the Company or any entity under its control (which for this purpose means ownership by the Company
of greater than 50% of the outstanding voting securities), as long as Mr. Levine was appointed as such entity’s CEO, during
the thirty six month period from the date of the agreement, the Company would pay Mr. Levine a bonus equal to 1% of the above
fund raising amount, up to a maximum aggregate amount of $200,000 in any calendar year. The employment agreement further provided
that in the event the Company or any of its wholly-owned subsidiaries or any entity under its control, as long as Mr. Levine was
appointed as such entity’s CEO, receives payment in connection with any collaboration or other transaction relating to their
respective products or technologies, excluding payments made to finance specific research and development activity and royalty
payments, Mr. Levine would be entitled to payment of 1% of the cash actually received by the Company in such transaction, up to
an aggregate maximum amount of $200,000 in any calendar year. Furthermore, the employment agreement provided that in the event
the Company or any of its wholly-owned subsidiaries or any entity under its control, as long as Mr. Levine was appointed as such
entity’s CEO, received payment in connection with payments made to finance specific research and development activity, Mr.
Levine would be entitled to receive payment of 0.5% of such funding actually received by the Company up to an aggregate maximum
of $200,000 in any calendar year and per single research and development funding. The aggregate of all such bonuses payable to
Mr. Levine in any calendar year could not exceed $300,000. In addition, the employment agreement provided that Mr. Levine would
be entitled to an annual bonus of NIS 66,000 upon meeting goals set by the Board of Directors. The employment agreement also provided
that Mr. Levine would be entitled to benefits such as convalescence pay, managers’ insurance, a study fund and a company
car.
In consideration for
his service as our CEO, under the employment agreement, on March 17, 2014, Mr. Levine was granted options to purchase 1,500,000
ordinary shares. 600,000 of the options are exercisable at NIS 0.60 each and 900,000 of the options are exercisable at NIS 0.90
each. The options vest over 36 months from October 20, 2013 in 12 equal installments at the end of each calendar quarter for as
long as Mr. Levine’s employment with us has not terminated. The options have a term of ten years.
On March 25, 2015,
a special meeting of shareholders approved a grant to Mr. Levine of an additional bonus of 0.5% of any funds raised by us from
any non-existing shareholder of ours up to $36,000 as well as options to purchase 100,000 ordinary shares exercisable at NIS 0.40
per share. Half the options vest upon grant and half vest in equal quarterly installments over 36 months provided Mr. Levine remains
employed or provides services to us. The options have a term of ten years. Such grant was made in consideration of Mr. Levine’s
consent to waive 10% of his monthly compensation until the later of a qualified financing and December 31, 2015.
On March 31, 2016,
a general meeting of shareholders of the Company approved the allocation of 1,000,000 stock options to the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer, exercisable into 1,000,000 ordinary shares of NIS 0.1 par value each of the Company, for an exercise price
of NIS 0.6 per stock option. The exercise period of the stock options is a maximum of ten years from the grant date. 33.33% of
the stock options vest following the lapse of 12 months from the grant date, and the remaining 66.67% vest in eight equal portions
each quarter over a period of two years from the first anniversary.
Itay Weinstein
In July 2017, we
entered into a service agreement with Mr. Itay Weinstein pursuant to which he serves as our Chief Financial Officer on a part
time basis. Mr. Weinstein is entitled to a monthly gross payment of NIS 11,000 (NIS 131,000 annually).
In addition, we
pay Shimony C.P.A, the accounting firm of which Mr. Weinstein is a Partner, monthly fees of NIS 14,000 for controller and bookkeeping
services.
David Kestenbaum
We entered into
an employment agreement dated as of January 9, 2014 with Mr. David Kestenbaum, our former Chief Financial Officer, or CFO. Mr.
Kestenbaum was entitled to a monthly gross base salary of NIS 33,000 (NIS 396,000 annually).
The employment
agreement provided that upon the successful completion of fund raising of at least $3 million in a public offering or private
placement of equity securities, including securities convertible or exercisable into equity by the Company within a period of
three years as of the effective date and, as long as Mr. Kestenbaum was employed by us as CFO, Mr. Kestenbaum would be entitled
to a one-time bonus payment equal to 0.6% of the funds raised, and up to maximum aggregate payment of $120,000 per year. The employment
agreement further provided that upon the successful completion of a transaction made by the Company or any of its fully owned
subsidiaries or any entity in its controls received payment in connection with any collaboration or other transaction relating
to their respective products or technologies, excluding payments made to finance specific research and development activity and
royalty payment, as long as the Mr. Kestenbaum was employed by us as CFO, Mr. Kestenbaum would be entitled to a one-time payment
equal to 0.5% of the transaction amount actually received by us in such transaction, whether as upfront payments, milestone payments
or payments of any other form, and up to maximum aggregate payment of $100,000 per year. Furthermore, the employment agreement
provided that upon the successful completion of a research and development funding in the Company, Mr. Kestenbaum would be entitled
to a one-time bonus payment equal to 0.4% of the funding amount, and up to a maximum aggregate payment of $75,000 per year. The
aggregate of all such bonuses payable to Mr. Kestenbaum in any calendar year could not exceed $150,000. The employment agreement
also provided that Mr. Kestenbaum would be entitled to pension and severance benefits, managers’ insurance as commonly acceptable
for office holders and a company car.
In consideration
for his service as our CFO, under the employment agreement, on December 30, 2013, Mr. Kestenbaum was granted options to purchase
750,000 ordinary shares at an exercise price of NIS 0.5328 per share. The options vested over 36 months in 12 equal installments
at the end of each calendar quarter following the grant date for as long as Mr. Kestenbaum’s employment with us has not
terminated. The options have a term of ten years.
The employment
agreement had a three-year term from the effective date of January 5, 2014. Either party may terminate the employment agreement
without cause upon 60 days’ advance written notice. The employment agreement is renewed automatically for an additional
period of 12 months unless terminated by either party with 60 day prior written notice to the other party. In the case of death
or disability, as such terms are defined in the employment agreement, Mr. Kestenbaum or his heirs shall be entitled to four months’
salary in addition to any severance pay under applicable law.
On March 25, 2015,
we granted to Mr. Kestenbaum options to purchase 100,000 ordinary shares at an exercise price of NIS 0.40 per share. Half the
options vest upon grant and half vest in equal quarterly installments over 36 months provided Mr. Kestenbaum remains employed
or provides services to us. The options have a term of ten years.
On June 1, 2015, we
granted to Mr. Kestenbaum options to purchase 200,000 ordinary shares at an exercise price of NIS 0.4283 per share. One third
of the options vest on the twelve month anniversary of the grant date, and the remaining two thirds vest on a quarterly basis
over the following two years provided Mr. Kestenbaum remains employed or provides services to us. The options have a term of ten
years.
On May 31, 2016, we
granted to Mr. Kestenbaum options to purchase 400,000 ordinary shares at an exercise price of NIS 0.60 per share. One third of
the options vest on the twelve month anniversary of the grant date, and the remaining two thirds vest on a quarterly basis over
the following 2 years provided Mr. Kestenbaum remains employed or provides services to us. The options have a term of ten years.
Mr. Kestenbaum
resigned as our Chief Financial Officer effective July 4, 2017. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, his pension amounts were
released to him upon resignation. In addition, on July 4th, 2017, the Company modified the terms of the options granted to Mr.
Kestenbaum by revising the exercise period to 12 months from the employee's cessation date.
Shlomo Shalev
On December 28, 2015,
our Board of Directors approved the terms upon which Shlomo Shalev shall serve as Chairman, subject to shareholder approval. Commencing
September 1, 2015, Mr. Shalev shall be entitled to a monthly fee of NIS 20,000 for at least 65 hours per month. In addition, Mr.
Shalev shall be entitled to options to purchase 1,500,000 ordinary shares at an exercise price of NIS 0.60 per share. One third
of the options vest on the twelve month anniversary of the grant date, and the remaining two thirds vest on a quarterly basis
over the following two years provided Mr. Shalev provides services to us. The options have a term of ten years. On March 31, 2016,
Mr. Shalev’s remuneration as Chairman was approved by an annual general meeting of the Company’s shareholders.
Jonathan Schapiro
We entered into a
consulting agreement dated January 1, 2015 with Dr. Jonathan Schapiro, a director. Commencing on such date, Dr. Schapiro shall
serve as a consultant to us for a monthly fee of $1,500 increasing to $3,000 upon the successful completion of a cash fund raising
of at least $3 million in a public offering or private placement of equity securities, including securities convertible or exercisable
into equity by us or any entity in our control. In addition under the consulting agreement, on December 30, 2014, Dr. Schapiro
was granted options to purchase 150,000 ordinary shares at an exercise price of NIS 0.4915 per share (in addition to the options
granted to him as a director on the same day as described above). One third of the options vest on the twelve month anniversary
of the grant date, and the remaining two thirds vest on a quarterly basis over the following two years provided Dr. Schapiro provides
services to us. The options have a term of ten years. The consulting agreement continues in force unless terminated without cause
upon 30 days’ advance written notice.
Share Option Plans
We
maintain the following share option plans for our and our subsidiary’s employees, directors and consultants. In addition
to the discussion below, see note 16 of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Our
Board of Directors administers our share option plans and has the authority to designate all terms of the options granted under
our plans including the grantees, exercise prices, grant dates, vesting schedules and expiration dates, which may be no more than
ten years after the grant date. Options may not be granted with an exercise price of less than the fair market value of our ordinary
shares on the date of grant, unless otherwise determined by our Board of Directors.
As
of December 31, 2017, we have granted to employees, directors and consultants options that are outstanding to purchase up to 7,385,833
ordinary shares under two share option plans.
2001 Share Option Plan
Under
a share option plan established in 2001, referred to as the 2001 Plan, we granted options between 2001 and 2011, at exercise prices
between $0.03 and $1.58 per ordinary share. Up to 2,200,000 ordinary shares were available to be granted under the 2001 Plan.
On July 29, 2009, the option pool was increased by 5,000,000 unissued additional ordinary shares, as well as forfeited and expired
options that reverted to the pool due to departure of employees. Options granted to Israeli employees were made in accordance
with section 102 of the Tax Ordinance, under the capital gains option set out in section 102(b)(2) of the ordinance. The options
are non-transferable.
As
of December 31, 2017, options to purchase 60,000 ordinary shares were outstanding, all of which were fully vested. The option
term is for a period of ten years from the grant date. On May 2, 2011, the 2001 Plan expired and no further options may be granted
under this plan. These options will expire in January 2018.
2011 Share Option Plan
On
August 29, 2011, our Board of Directors approved the adoption of an employee stock option scheme for the grant of options exercisable
into shares of the Company according to section 102 to the Israeli Tax Ordinance, or the 2011 Plan, and to reserve up to 10 million
ordinary shares in the framework of the 2011 Plan, for options allocation to employees, directors and consultants.
The
2011 Plan shall be subject to section 102 of the Israeli Tax Ordinance. According to the Capital Gain Track, which was adopted
by us and the abovementioned section 102, we are not entitled to receive a tax deduction that relates to remuneration paid to
our employees, including amounts recorded as salary benefit in our accounts for options granted to employees in the framework
of the 2011 Plan, except the yield benefit component, if available, that was determined on the grant date. The terms of the options
which will be granted according to the 2011 Plan, including option period, exercise price, vesting period and exercise period,
shall be determined by our Board of Directors on the date of the actual allocation.
As
of the December 31, 2017, we have granted options to purchase 7,325,833 ordinary shares under the 2011 Plan at exercise prices
between $0.03 and $0.25 per ordinary share.
Board Practices
Election of Directors and Terms of Office
Our Board of Directors
currently consists of seven members, including our non-executive Chairman. Other than our two external directors, our directors
are elected by an ordinary resolution at the annual general meeting of our shareholders. The nomination of our directors is proposed
by our Board of Directors or a designated nomination committee composed of three members of our Board of Directors, whose proposal
is then approved by the board. Our board, following receipt of a proposal of the nomination committee, has the authority to add
additional directors up to the maximum number of 12 directors allowed under our Articles. Such directors appointed by the board
serve until the next annual general meeting of the shareholders. Unless they resign before the end of their term or are removed
in accordance with our Articles, all of our directors, other than our external directors, will serve as directors until our next
annual general meeting of shareholders. On December 30, 2014, the annual general meeting of our shareholders appointed four new
members to the Company’s board of directors - Dr. Jonathan Schapiro, Dr. Dobroslav Melamed, Doron Turgeman and Shlomo Shalev.
At the same annual general meeting, Mr. David Bassa was re-elected to serve as a director of the Company. On March 25, 2015, Osnat
Hillel Fain and Oded Nagar were elected as external directors to serve for a three-year term until March 24, 2018. On August 31,
2015, David Bassa resigned as Chairman of the Board of Directors (though he remained a director) and Shlomo Shalev was appointed
to serve as interim Chairman of the Board of Directors on such date. On March 31, 2016, an annual general meeting of the Company’s
shareholders approved the appointment of Shlomo Shalev as Chairman of the Board of Directors. At the same general meeting, Dr.
Jonathan Schapiro, Dr. Dobroslav Melamed, Doron Turgeman and David Bassa were re-elected to serve as directors of the Company.
On April 27, 2017, David Bassa resigned as a director and Alexander Rabinovich was appointed a director. On August 3, 2017, our
shareholders at the annual general meeting elected Mr. Rabinovitch and re-elected Dr. Jonathan Schapiro, Mr. Shlomo Shalev, Mr.
Doron Turgeman and Dr. Dobroslav Melamed as directors of the Company.
None
of our directors or officers has any family relationship with any other director or officer.
Our
Articles permit us to maintain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and to indemnify our directors and officers
for actions performed on behalf of us, subject to specified limitations. We maintain a directors and officers insurance policy
which covers the liability of our directors and officers as allowed under Israeli Companies Law.
There
are no service contracts or similar arrangements with any director that provide for benefits upon termination of a directorship.
External and Independent Directors
The Israeli Companies
Law requires Israeli companies with shares that have been offered to the public either in or outside of Israel to appoint two
external directors. No person may be appointed as an external director if that person or that person’s relative, partner,
employer or any entity under the person’s control, has or had, on or within the two years preceding the date of that person’s
appointment to serve as an external director, any affiliation with the company or any entity controlling, controlled by or under
common control with the company. The term affiliation includes:
|
·
|
an
employment relationship;
|
|
·
|
a business or professional
relationship maintained on a regular basis;
|
|
·
|
service as an office
holder, other than service as an officer for a period of not more than three months, during which the company first offered
shares to the public.
|
No person may serve
as an external director if that person’s position or business activities create, or may create, a conflict of interest with
that person’s responsibilities as an external director or may otherwise interfere with his/her ability to serve as an external
director. If, at the time external directors are to be appointed, all current members of the Board of Directors are of the same
gender, then at least one external director must be of the other gender. A director in one company shall not be appointed as an
external director in another company if at that time a director of the other company serves as an external director in the first
company. In addition, no person may be appointed as an external director if he/she is a member or employee of the Israeli Security
Authority, and also not if he/she is a member of the Board of Directors or an employee of a stock exchange in Israel.
External directors
are to be elected by a majority vote at a shareholders’ meeting, provided that either:
|
·
|
the majority of
shares voted at the meeting, including at least one-half of the shares held by non-controlling shareholders or other shareholders
who have a personal interest in such election voted at the meeting, vote in favor of election of the director, with abstaining
votes not being counted in this vote; or
|
|
·
|
the total number
of shares held by non-controlling shareholders voted against the election of the director does not exceed two percent of the
aggregate voting rights in the company.
|
The initial term of
an external director is three years and may be extended for two additional three-year terms. An external director may be removed
only by the same percentage of shareholders as is required for their election, or by a court, and then only if such external director
ceases to meet the statutory qualifications for their appointment or violates his or her duty of loyalty to the company. Both
external directors must serve on every committee that is empowered to exercise one of the functions of the Board of Directors.
An external director
is entitled to compensation as provided in regulations adopted under the Israeli Companies Law and is otherwise prohibited from
receiving any other compensation, directly or indirectly, in connection with service provided as an external director.
Osnat Hillel Fain
and Oded Nagar serve as external directors pursuant to the provisions of the Israeli Companies Law. They both serve on our audit
committee, our committee for the approval of financial statements, our nomination committee and our compensation committee.
Audit Committee
The Israeli Companies
Law requires public companies to appoint an audit committee. The responsibilities of the audit committee include identifying irregularities
in the management of the company’s business and approving related party transactions as required by law. An audit committee
must consist of at least three directors, including all of its external directors. The chairman of the Board of Directors, any
director employed by or otherwise providing services to the company, and a controlling shareholder or any relative of a controlling
shareholder, may not serve as members of the audit committee. An audit committee may not approve an action or a transaction with
a controlling shareholder, or with an office holder, unless at the time of approval two external directors are serving as members
of the audit committee and at least one of the external directors was present at the meeting in which an approval was granted.
Our audit committee
is currently comprised of three independent non-executive directors. The audit committee is chaired by Osnat Hillel Fain, with
Doron Turgeman, who serves as the audit committee financial expert, and Oded Nagar as members. The audit committee meets at least
four times a year and monitors the adequacy of our internal controls, accounting policies and financial reporting. It regularly
reviews the results of the ongoing risk self-assessment process, which we undertake, and our interim and annual reports prior
to their submission for approval by the full Board of Directors. The audit committee oversees the activities of the internal auditor,
sets its annual tasks and goals and reviews its reports. The audit committee reviews the objectivity and independence of the external
auditors and also considers the scope of their work and fees.
We have adopted a
written charter for our audit committee, setting forth its responsibilities as outlined by the regulations of the SEC. In addition,
our audit committee has adopted procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints we may receive regarding accounting,
internal accounting controls, or auditing matters and the submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting
or auditing matters. In addition, SEC rules mandate that the audit committee of a listed issuer consist of at least three members,
all of whom must be independent, as such term is defined by rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC. We are in compliance
with the independence requirements of the SEC rules.
Financial Statement Examination
Committee
According to regulations
promulgated under the Companies law and since we are considered as a “Small Corporation” under the Israeli Securities
law Regulation, we are not required to appoint a financial statement examination committee, therefore our financial statements
are examined and approved by our board of directors.
Compensation Committee
Under the Companies
Law, the board of directors of any public company must establish a compensation committee and to adopt a compensation policy with
respect to its officers, or the Compensation Policy. In addition, the Companies Law sets forth the approval process required for
a public company’s engagement with its officers (with specific reference to a director, a non-director officer, a chief
executive officer and controlling shareholders and their relatives who are employed by the company).
The compensation
committee shall be nominated by the board of directors and be comprised of its members. The compensation committee must consist
of at least three members. All of the external directors must serve on the compensation committee and constitute a majority of
its members. The remaining members of the compensation committee must be directors who qualify to serve as members of the audit
committee (including the fact that they are independent) and their compensation should be identical to the compensation paid to
the external directors of the company. The approval of the compensation committee is required in order to approve terms of office
and/or employment of office holders. The Company’s Compensation Policy was duly approved on August 3, 2017.
Similar to the rules
that apply to the audit committee, the compensation committee may not include the chairman of the board, or any director employed
by the company, by a controlling shareholder or by any entity controlled by a controlling shareholder, or any director providing
services to the company, to a controlling shareholder or to any entity controlled by a controlling shareholder on a regular basis,
or any director whose primary income is dependent on a controlling shareholder, and may not include a controlling shareholder
or any of its relatives. Individuals who are not permitted to be compensation committee members may not participate in the committee’s
meetings other than to present a particular issue; provided, however, that an employee that is not a controlling shareholder or
relative may participate in the committee’s discussions, but not in any vote, and the company’s legal counsel and
corporate secretary may participate in the committee’s discussions and votes if requested by the committee.
The roles of the compensation
committee are, among other things, to: (i) recommend to the board of directors the Compensation Policy for office holders and
recommend to the board once every three years the extension of a Compensation Policy that had been approved for a period of more
than three years; (ii) recommend to the directors any update of the Compensation Policy, from time to time, and examine its implementation;
(iii) decide whether to approve the terms of office and of employment of office holders that require approval of the compensation
committee; and (iv) decide, in certain circumstances, whether to exempt the approval of terms of office of a chief executive officer
from the requirement of shareholder approval.
The Compensation Policy
requires the approval of the general meeting of shareholders with a “Special Majority”, which requires a majority
of the shareholders of the company who are not either a controlling shareholder or an “interested party” in the proposed
resolution, or the shareholders holding less than 2% of the voting power in the company voted against the proposed resolution
at such meeting. However, under special circumstances, the board of directors may approve the Compensation Policy without shareholder
approval, if the compensation committee and thereafter the board of directors decided, based on substantiated reasons after they
have reviewed the compensation policy again, that the Compensation Policy is in the best interest of the company.
The compensation
policy must serve as the basis for decisions concerning the financial terms of employment or engagement of executive officers
and directors, including exculpation, insurance, indemnification or any monetary payment or obligation of payment in respect of
employment or engagement. The Compensation Policy must relate to certain factors, including advancement of the company’s
objectives, the company’s business and its long-term strategy, and creation of appropriate incentives for executives. It
must also consider, among other things, the company’s risk management, size and the nature of its operations. The Compensation
Policy must furthermore consider the following additional factors:
|
●
|
the knowledge, skills,
expertise and accomplishments of the relevant director or executive;
|
|
●
|
the director’s
or executive’s roles and responsibilities and prior compensation agreements with
him or her;
|
|
●
|
the relationship between
the terms offered and the average and median compensation of the other employees of the
company;
|
|
●
|
the impact of disparities
in salary upon work relationships in the company;
|
|
●
|
the possibility of
reducing variable compensation at the discretion of the board of directors; and the possibility
of setting a limit on the exercise value of non-cash variable compensation; and
|
|
●
|
as to severance compensation,
the period of service of the director or executive, the terms of his or her compensation
during such service period, the company’s performance during that period of service,
the person’s contribution towards the company’s achievement of its goals
and the maximization of its profits, and the circumstances under which the person is
leaving the company.
|
The compensation
policy must also include the following principles:
|
●
|
the link between variable
compensation and long-term performance and measurable criteria;
|
|
●
|
the relationship between
variable and fixed compensation, and the ceiling for the value of variable compensation;
|
|
●
|
the conditions under
which a director or executive would be required to repay compensation paid to him or
her if it was later shown that the data upon which such compensation was based was inaccurate
and was required to be restated in the company’s financial statements;
|
|
●
|
the minimum holding
or vesting period for variable, equity-based compensation; and
|
|
●
|
maximum limits for
severance compensation.
|
The compensation policy must also consider
appropriate incentives from a long-term perspective and maximum limits for severance compensation.
Osnat Hillel Fain
is the chairman of our compensation committee. Doron Turgeman and Oded Nagar serve as the other members of our compensation committee.
Approval of Compensation to Our
Officers
The Israeli Companies
Law prescribes that compensation to officers must be approved by a company’s board of directors.
As detailed above,
our compensation committee consists of three independent directors: Doron Turgeman, Osnat Hillel Fain and Oded Nagar. The responsibilities
of the compensation committee are to set our overall policy on executive remuneration and to decide the specific remuneration,
benefits and terms of employment for directors, officers and the Chief Executive Officer.
The objectives of
the compensation committee’s policies are that such individuals should receive compensation which is appropriate given their
performance, level of responsibility and experience. Compensation packages should also allow us to attract and retain executives
of the necessary caliber while, at the same time, motivating them to achieve the highest level of corporate performance in line
with the best interests of shareholders. In order to determine the elements and level of remuneration appropriate to each executive
director, the compensation committee reviews surveys on executive pay, obtains external professional advice and considers individual
performance.
Internal Auditor
Under the Israeli
Companies Law, the board of directors must appoint an internal auditor, nominated by the audit committee. Our internal auditor
is Daniel Spira. The role of the internal auditor is to examine, among other matters, whether the company’s actions comply
with the law and orderly business procedure. Under the Israeli Companies Law, an internal auditor may not be:
|
·
|
a
person (or a relative of a person) who holds more than 5% of the company’s shares;
|
|
·
|
a
person (or a relative of a person) who has the power to appoint a director or the general
manager of the company;
|
|
·
|
an
executive officer or director of the company; or
|
|
·
|
a member of the
company’s independent accounting firm.
|
We comply with
the requirement of the Israeli Companies Law relating to internal auditors. Our internal auditors examine whether our various
activities comply with the law and orderly business procedure. Our internal auditor is not our employee, but the managing partner
of a firm which specializes in internal auditing.
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The following is a
description of some of the transactions with related parties to which we, or our subsidiaries, are party, and which were in effect
within the past three fiscal years. The descriptions provided below are summaries of the terms of such agreements, do not purport
to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by the complete agreements.
We believe that we
have executed all of our transactions with related parties on terms no less favorable to us than those we could have obtained
from unaffiliated third parties. We are required by Israeli law to ensure that all future transactions between us and our officers,
directors and principal shareholders and their affiliates are approved by a majority of our board of directors, including a majority
of the independent and disinterested members of our board of directors, and that they are on terms no less favorable to us than
those that we could obtain from unaffiliated third parties.
Employment and Consulting Agreements
We have or have had
employment, consulting or related agreements with each member of our senior management. See “Management—Compensation—Employment
Agreements”.
InterCure
In July 2012, we acquired
the control over InterCure Ltd, or InterCure, a public company whose shares are traded on the TASE and which develops a home therapeutic
device for non-medicinal and non-invasive treatment of various diseases such as hypertension, heart failure, sleeplessness and
mental stress and markets and sells a home therapeutic device for hypertension. As a result of a series of transactions including
a transaction, that closed in February 2015, between InterCure and Green Forest Global Ltd., or Green Forest, a company wholly
owned by Mr. Alexander Rabinovitch (a greater than 5% shareholder of ours), our holdings in Intercure were diluted to 5.82% of
the issued and outstanding share capital of Intercure.
More specifically,
on November 3, 2014, InterCure announced that on November 2, 2014, its Audit Committee and Board of Directors approved the signing
of an agreement with Green Forest which was then approved by Intercure’s shareholders on December 23, 2014. The agreement
closed on February 15, 2015 with the following material events occurring between February 1, 2015 and April 2, 2015:
|
·
|
On
February 1, 2015, in accordance with a request made by the Israeli Securities Authority
to increase public holdings in InterCure prior to the execution of the agreement, we
sold 2,166,667 shares of InterCure to a non-related third party, for an amount of approximately
$17,000.
|
|
·
|
On February 8, 2015,
InterCure effected a 1 for 10 reverse split.
|
|
·
|
On February 15,
2015, an outstanding loan of $50,000 owed by InterCure to us was converted into 569,470 ordinary shares of InterCure. At the
same time, Green Forest was issued 2,622,647 ordinary shares of Intercure.
|
|
·
|
On March 23, 2015,
InterCure issued 37,804,012 ordinary shares as part of a rights offering dated February 22, 2015.
|
|
·
|
On March 31, 2015,
we and Green Forest mutually agreed to terminate the voting agreement signed by the parties on February 12, 2015. Following
said termination, the directors appointed by us resigned from the board of directors of InterCure.
|
|
·
|
On April 2, 2015,
Green Forest was issued an additional 2,622,647 ordinary shares of Intercure
|
The foregoing information is
based on public filings made by InterCure to the Israeli Securities Authorities.
Alexander Rabinovitch
In
April 2015, Alexander Rabinovitch, director and a holder of more than 5% of our ordinary shares, entered into a security purchase
agreement resulting in the issuance of an aggregate of 31,111 ADSs representing 3,111,120 ordinary shares in a registered direct
offering at $11.25 per ADS for a purchase price of $350,001. In addition, we issued unregistered warrants to purchase 15,556 ADSs
representing 1,555,560 ordinary shares in a private placement. The warrants may be exercised at any time for a period of five
and one-half years from issuance and have an exercise price of $11.25 per ADS, subject to adjustment as set forth therein.
In
March 2017, Alexander Rabinovitch entered into a security purchase agreement resulting in the issuance of an aggregate of 250,000
unregistered ADSs representing 25,000,000 ordinary shares at $2.00 per ADS for a purchase price of $500,000 and unregistered warrants
to purchase 250,000 ADSs representing 25,000,000 ordinary shares. The warrants may be exercised at any time for a period of five
and one-half years from issuance and have an exercise price of $2.30 per ADS, subject to adjustment as set forth therein.
David Bassa
In
April 2015, David Bassa, a holder of more than 5% of our ordinary shares, entered into a security purchase agreement resulting
in the issuance of an aggregate of 14,222 ADSs representing 1,422,240 ordinary shares in a registered direct offering at $11.25
per ADS for a purchase price of $160,002. In addition, we issued unregistered warrants to purchase 7,112 ADSs representing 711,120
ordinary shares in a private placement. The warrants may be exercised at any time for a period of five and one-half years from
issuance and have an exercise price of $11.25 per ADS, subject to adjustment as set forth therein.
In
March 2017, David Bassa entered into a security purchase agreement resulting in the issuance of an aggregate of 122,500 unregistered
ADSs representing 12,250,000 ordinary shares at $2.00 per ADS for a purchase price of $245,000 and unregistered warrants to purchase
122,500 ADSs representing 12,250,000 ordinary shares. The warrants may be exercised at any time for a period of five and one-half
years from issuance and have an exercise price of $2.30 per ADS, subject to adjustment as set forth therein.
Indemnification Agreements
Israeli
law permits a company to insure an office holder in respect of liabilities incurred by him or her as a result of an act or omission
in the capacity of an office holder for:
|
·
|
a
breach of the office holder’s duty of care towards the company or towards another
person;
|
|
·
|
a
breach of the office holder’s fiduciary duty to the company, provided that he or
she acted in good faith and had reasonable cause to believe that the act would not prejudice
the company; and
|
|
·
|
a
financial liability imposed upon the office holder in favor of another person.
|
|
·
|
A
financial liability imposed on the office holder's for all victims of the violation in
an Administrative Proceeding.
|
|
·
|
Expenses
incurred by the office holder's in connection with an Administrative Proceeding conducted
in his or her case, including litigation expenses and reasonable legal fees.
|
Moreover,
a company can indemnify an office holder for any of the following obligations or expenses incurred in connection with the acts
or omissions of such person in his or her capacity as an office holder:
|
·
|
monetary
liability imposed upon him or her in favor of a third party by a judgment, including
a settlement or an arbitral award confirmed by the court; and
|
|
·
|
reasonable
litigation expenses, including legal fees, actually incurred by the office holder or
imposed upon him or her by a court, in a proceeding brought against him or her by or
on behalf of the company or by a third party, or in a criminal action in which he or
she was acquitted, or in a criminal action which does not require criminal intent in
which he or she was convicted; furthermore, a company can, with a limited exception,
exculpate an office holder in advance, in whole or in part, from liability for damages
sustained by a breach of duty of care to the company.
|
|
·
|
financial
liability imposed on the office holder for all victims of the violation in an Administrative
Proceeding.
|
|
·
|
expenses
incurred by the office holder in connection with an Administrative Proceeding conducted
in his or her case, including litigation expenses and reasonable legal fees.
|
Our
Articles of Association allow for insurance, exculpation and indemnification of office holders to the fullest extent permitted
by law. We have entered into indemnification, insurance and exculpation agreements with our directors and executive officers,
following shareholder approval of these agreements. We have directors’ and officers’ liability insurance covering
our officers and directors for a claim imposed upon them as a result of an action carried out while serving as an officer or director,
for (a) the breach of duty of care towards us or towards another person, (b) the breach of fiduciary duty towards us, provided
that the officer or director acted in good faith and had reasonable grounds to assume that the action would not harm our interests,
and (c) a monetary liability imposed upon him in favor of a third party.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP
OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table
sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our outstanding ordinary shares as of January 18, 2018 by the members
of our senior management, board of directors, individually and as a group, and each person who we know beneficially owns 5% or
more of our outstanding ordinary shares. The beneficial ownership of ordinary shares is based on 514,205,799 ordinary shares outstanding
as of January 18, 2018 and is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes any ordinary shares over
which a person exercises sole or shared voting or investment power. For purposes of the table below, we deem shares subject to
options or warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of January 18, 2018, to be outstanding and to
be beneficially owned by the person holding the options or warrants for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of
that person but we do not treat them as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Number of
Ordinary
Shares
|
|
|
Percentage of
Class*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
Management and Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shlomo
Shalev
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
1,400,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Josh
Levine
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2,262,499
|
(2)
|
|
|
*
|
|
David
Kestenbaum
Former Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
1,095,833
|
(3)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Osnat
Hillel Fain
Director
|
|
|
150,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Oded
Nagar
Director
|
|
|
150,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Alexander
Rabinovich
Director
|
|
|
154,432,787
|
(5)
|
|
|
28.59
|
%
|
Jonathan
Schapiro
Director
|
|
|
300,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dobroslav
Melamed
Director
|
|
|
150,000
|
(7)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Doron
Turgeman
Director
|
|
|
640,000
|
(8)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors
and Senior Management as a group (9 persons)
|
|
|
160,581,119
|
|
|
|
29.79
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial owners of 5% or more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alexander
Rabinovitch
|
|
|
154,432,787
|
|
|
|
28.59
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David
Bassa
|
|
|
48,399,347
|
(9)
|
|
|
6.16
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Includes
(i) 150,000 ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of options at an exercise price
of NIS 0.4325 per share exercisable until December 29, 2024 (ii) 1,250,000 ordinary shares
issuable upon the exercise of options at an exercise price of NIS 0.6 per share exercisable
until March 30, 2026. Excludes options to purchase 250,000 ordinary shares that vest
in more than 60 days from the date hereof.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes
(i) 600,000 ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of options at an exercise price
of NIS 0.60 per share exercisable until October 13, 2023, (ii) 900,000 ordinary shares
issuable upon the exercise of options at an exercise price of NIS 0.90 per share exercisable
until October 13, 2023, (iii) 95,833 ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of options
at an exercise price of NIS 0.40 per share exercisable until March 24, 2025 and (iv)
666,666 ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of options at an exercise price of
NIS 0.60 per share exercisable until March 30, 2026. Excludes 1,337,502 ordinary shares
issuable upon the exercise of options that vest in more than 60 days from the date hereof.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes
(i) 750,000 ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of options at an exercise price
of NIS 0.5328 per share exercisable until July 4, 2018, (ii) 87,500 ordinary shares issuable
upon the exercise of options at an exercise price of NIS 0.40 per share exercisable until
July 4, 2018, (iii) 125,000 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of options at an exercise
price of NIS 0.4283 per share until July 4, 2018 and (iv) 133,333 ordinary shares issuable
upon exercise of options at an exercise price of NIS 0.6 per share until July 5, 2018.
|
|
(4)
|
Includes
150,000 ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of options at an exercise price of
NIS 0.4 per share exercisable until March 24, 2025.
|
|
(5)
|
Includes
(i) 62,149,487 ordinary shares, (ii) 663,944 ADSs representing 66,394,400 ordinary shares,
(iii) warrants to purchase 8,889 ADSs representing 888,896 ordinary shares at $11.25
per ADS until March 31, 2020 and (iv) warrants to purchase 250,000 ADSs representing
25,000,000 ordinary shares at $2.30 per ADS until September 21, 2022. Pursuant to the
terms of the foregoing warrants the holder cannot exercise such warrants if it would
beneficially own, after any such exercise, more than 4.99% of the outstanding ordinary
shares. The percentage in the table above does not give effect to the blocker.
|
|
(6)
|
Includes
(i) 150,000 ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of options at an exercise price
of NIS 0.4325 per share exercisable until December 29, 2024, and (ii) 150,000 ordinary
shares issuable upon the exercise of options at an exercise price of NIS 0.4915 per share
exercisable until December 29, 2024.
|
|
(7)
|
Includes
(i) 150,000 ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of options at an exercise price
of NIS 0.4325 per share exercisable until December 29, 2024.
|
|
(8)
|
Includes
(i) 340,000 ordinary shares represented by 3,400 ADSs, (ii) 150,000 ordinary shares,
and (iii) 150,000 ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of options at an exercise
price of NIS 0.4325 per share exercisable until December 29, 2024.
|
|
(9)
|
Includes
(i) 35,378,227 ordinary shares represented by 353,782 ADSs; (ii) 12,250,000 ordinary
shares represented by 1,250,000 ADSs issuable upon the exercise of warrant at a price
of $2.30 per share; and (iii) 7,111 ADSs representing 711,120 ordinary shares. This
shareholder is a former director of our company.
|
SELLING
SHAREHOLDERS
This prospectus
relates to the offer for sale of up to 385,000,000 ordinary shares represented by 3,850,000 American Depositary Shares, or
ADSs, which consists of (i) 140,000,000 ordinary shares represented by 1,400,000 unregistered ADSs originally issued to investors
in a private placement in March 2017; (ii) 140,000,000 ordinary shares represented by 1,400,000 ADSs issuable upon exercise of
unregistered warrants originally issued to investors in a private placement in March 2017; (iii) 100,000,000 ordinary shares represented
by 1,000,000 ADSs issuable upon exercise of unregistered warrants originally issued to investors in a private placement in February
2017 and (iv) 5,000,000 ordinary shares represented by 50,000 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants issued to the placement
agent and its affiliates in connection with the February 2017 private placement. Each ADS represents 100 ordinary shares.
For additional
information regarding the issuance of those ADSs and warrants to purchase ADSs, see the descriptions of the March 2017 and February
2017 financings in the “Prospectus Summary” above. We are registering the ordinary shares represented by ADSs in order
to permit the selling shareholders to offer the ordinary shares represented by ADSs for resale from time to time. Other than with
respect to H.C. Wainwright & Co. LLC, or H.C. Wainwright, which acted as our placement agent in the February 2017 financing,
or as disclosed elsewhere in this prospectus, except for the ownership of the ADSs and warrants issued, and the ADSs issued and
issuable, pursuant to prior financings, the selling shareholders have not had any material relationship with us within the past
three years.
The table below
lists the selling shareholders and other information regarding the beneficial ownership of the ordinary shares represented by
ADSs by each of the selling shareholders. The second column lists the number of ordinary shares represented by ADSs beneficially
owned by each selling stockholder, based on its ownership of ADSs and warrants to purchase ADSs, as of January 31, 2018, assuming
exercise of the warrants held by the selling shareholders on that date, without regard to any limitations on conversions or exercises.
The third column lists the maximum number of ordinary shares represented by ADSs being offered in this prospectus by the selling
shareholders. The fourth and fifth columns list the amount of ordinary shares represented by ADSs owned after the offering, by
number of ordinary shares represented by ADSs and percentage of outstanding ordinary shares, assuming in both cases the sale of
all of the ordinary shares represented by ADSs offered by the selling shareholders pursuant to this prospectus.
Under the terms
of the warrants, a selling stockholder may not exercise the warrants to the extent such exercise would cause such selling stockholder,
together with its affiliates, to beneficially own a number of ordinary shares which would exceed 4.99% of our then outstanding
ordinary shares following such exercise, excluding for purposes of such determination ordinary shares not yet issuable upon exercise
of the warrants which have not been exercised. The number of shares does not reflect this limitation. The selling shareholders
may sell all, some or none of their ordinary shares represented by ADSs or warrants in this offering. See “Plan of Distribution.”
Selling Shareholder
|
|
Number of
Ordinary Shares
Owned Prior to
Offering
|
|
|
Maximum
Number
of Ordinary
Shares to be
Sold Pursuant
to this
Prospectus
|
|
|
Number of
Ordinary
Shares Owned
After the
Offering
|
|
|
Percentage of
Ordinary
Shares
Owned After
the
Offering**
|
|
Hudson Bay Master Fund
Ltd. (1)
|
|
|
40,000,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
20,000,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
20,000,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
3.74
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intracoastal Capital, LLC (5)
|
|
|
40,000,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
20,000,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
20,000,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
3.74
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warberg WF V LP (6)
|
|
|
40,000,000
|
(7)
|
|
|
40,000,000
|
(7)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CVI Investments, Inc. (8)
|
|
|
40,000,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
20,000,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
20,000,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
3.74
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alexander Rabinovich (9)
|
|
|
154,432,787
|
(10)
|
|
|
50,000,000
|
(11)
|
|
|
104,432,787
|
(12)
|
|
|
19.34
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Bassa (13)
|
|
|
48,339,347
|
(14)
|
|
|
24,500,000
|
(15)
|
|
|
23,839,347
|
(16)
|
|
|
4.52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benjamin Guzman
|
|
|
9,000,020
|
(17)
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
(18)
|
|
|
4,000,020
|
(19)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costanza Private Wealth Management AG (20)
|
|
|
20,000,000
|
(21)
|
|
|
20,000,000
|
(21)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tomer Abir Zimmerman
|
|
|
8,200,000
|
(22)
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
(23)
|
|
|
1,200,000
|
(24)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ido Seltenreich
|
|
|
880,075
|
(25)
|
|
|
500,000
|
(25)
|
|
|
380,075
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zamir Bar Zion
|
|
|
4,222,200
|
(26)
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
(26)
|
|
|
1,722,200
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yaakov Tannenbaum
|
|
|
8,500,000
|
(27)
|
|
|
8,500,000
|
(27)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adi Yaniv
|
|
|
8,500,000
|
(27)
|
|
|
8,500,000
|
(27)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronen Waisserberg
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
(28)
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
(28)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avi Gantz
|
|
|
10,444,400
|
(28)
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
(28)
|
|
|
3,444,400
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Or Elovitz
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
(29)
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
(29)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orna Elovitz
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
(29)
|
|
|
3,500,000
|
(29)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amikam Shorer
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
(29)
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
(29)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petrichor Ventures Limited Partnership (30)
|
|
|
6,500,000
|
(31)
|
|
|
6,500,000
|
(31)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iory Rabinovitch
|
|
|
44,500,000
|
(32)
|
|
|
44,500,000
|
(32)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariann Rosza Bassa (13)
|
|
|
14,000,000
|
(33)
|
|
|
14,000,000
|
(33)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noked Opportunity LP (34)
|
|
|
42,048,244
|
(35)
|
|
|
38,000,000
|
(36)
|
|
|
4,048,244
|
(37)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lacrimed Israel LTD (38)
|
|
|
20,000,000
|
(21)
|
|
|
20,000,000
|
(21)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meir Mazuz
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
(39)
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
(39)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gilai Dolev (Lagos Consulting) (40)
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
(39)
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
(39)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Itai Feirberg
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
(26)
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
(26)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Vasinkevich (41)
|
|
|
5,448,400
|
(42)
|
|
|
3,225,000
|
(43)
|
|
|
2,223,400
|
(44)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noam Rubinstein (41)
|
|
|
3,605,000
|
(45)
|
|
|
1,575,000
|
(46)
|
|
|
2,030,000
|
(47)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Viklund (41)
|
|
|
343,400
|
(48)
|
|
|
150,000
|
(49)
|
|
|
193,400
|
(50)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles Worthman (41)
|
|
|
114,500
|
(51)
|
|
|
50,000
|
(52)
|
|
|
64,500
|
(53)
|
|
|
*
|
|
* Denotes less than 1%
**Assumes that all shares are sold.
Applicable percentage ownership is based on 514,205,799 ordinary shares outstanding as of January 31, 2018. “Beneficial
ownership” includes shares for which an individual, directly or indirectly, has or shares voting or investment power, or
both, and also includes options that are exercisable within 60 days of January 31, 2018. Unless otherwise indicated, all of the
listed persons have sole voting and investment power over the shares listed opposite their names. Beneficial ownership as reported
in the above table has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act. In computing the percentage ownership
of any person, the amount of shares outstanding is deemed to include the amount of shares beneficially owned by such person (and
only such person) by reason of these acquisition rights.
|
(1)
|
Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd.
Capital Management LP, the investment manager of Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd., has sole
voting and investment power over these securities. Sander Gerber is the managing member
of Hudson Bay Capital GP LLC, which is the general partner of Hudson Bay Capital Management
LP. Each of Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd. and Sander Gerber disclaims beneficial ownership
over these securities.
|
|
(2)
|
Represents (i) 20,000,000
ordinary shares represented by 200,000ADSs issued in our February 2017 private placement
and (ii) 20,000,000 ordinary shares represented by 200,000 ADSs issuable upon exercise
of warrants issued in our February 2017 private placement.
|
|
(3)
|
Represents 20,000,000 ordinary
shares represented by 200,000 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants issued in our February
2017 private placement
|
|
(4)
|
Represents 20,000,000 ordinary
shares represented by 200,000 ADSs issued in our February 2017 private placement.
|
|
(5)
|
Mitchell P. Kopin, or Mr.
Kopin, and Daniel B. Asher, or Mr. Asher, each of whom are managers of Intracoastal Capital
LLC, or Intracoastal, have shared voting control and investment discretion over the securities
reported herein that are held by Intracoastal. As a result, each of Mr. Kopin and Mr.
Asher may be deemed to have beneficial ownership (as determined under Section 13(d) of
Exchange Act) of the securities reported herein that are held by Intracoastal.
|
In the aggregate, Mr. Kopin
and Mr. Asher may be deemed to have beneficial ownership (as determined under Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act) of 40,000,000
ordinary shares, which consists of (i) 20,000,000 ordinary shares represented by 200,000 ADSs issued in our February 2017 private
placement and (ii) 20,000,000 ordinary shares represented by 200,000 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants issued in our February
2017 private placement.
Mr. Asher, who is a manager
of Intracoastal, is also a control person of a broker-dealer. As a result of such common control, Intracoastal may be deemed to
be an affiliate of a broker-dealer. Intracoastal acquired the ordinary shares being registered hereunder in the ordinary course
of business, and at the time of acquisition of the ordinary shares and warrants described herein, Intracoastal did not have any
arrangements or undertakings with any person to distribute such securities.
|
(6)
|
Daniel Warsh and Jonathan
Blumberg are each managers of Warberg WF V LP. Messrs. Warsh and Blumberg have shared
voting and dispositive power over these securities.
|
|
(7)
|
Represents 40,000,000 ordinary
shares represented by 400,000 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants issued in our February
2017 private placement.
|
|
(8)
|
Heights Capital Management,
Inc., the authorized agent of CVI Investments, Inc. (“CVI”), has discretionary
authority to vote and dispose of the shares held by CVI and may be deemed to be the beneficial
owner of these shares. Martin Kobinger, in his capacity as investment manager of Heights
Capital Management, Inc., may also be deemed to have investment discretion and voting
power over the shares held by CVI. Mr. Kobinger disclaims any such beneficial ownership
of the shares.
|
|
(9)
|
The selling shareholder is
a member of the Board of Directors of the Company.
|
|
(10)
|
Represents (i) 103,543,887
ordinary shares, (ii) 4,444,500 ordinary shares represented by ADSs underlying warrants,
(iii) 25,000,000 ordinary shares represented by 250,000 ADSs issued in our March 2017
private placement and (iv) 25,000,000 ordinary shares represented by 250,000 ADSs underlying
warrants issuable upon exercise of warrants issued in our March 2017 private placement.
|
|
(11)
|
Represents (i) 25,000,000
ordinary shares represented by 250,000 ADSs issued in our March 2017 private placement
and (ii) 25,000,000 ordinary shares represented by 250,000 ADSs underlying warrants issuable
upon exercise of warrants issued in our March 2017 private placement.
|
|
(12)
|
Represents (i) 103,543,887
ordinary shares and (ii) 4,444,500 ordinary shares represented by ADSs underlying warrants.
|
|
(13)
|
The selling shareholder
is a former member of the Board of Directors of the Company. Mariann Rosza Bassa is Mr.
Bassa’s spouse. Together, they own directly and indirectly approximately 7.93%
of the Company’s securities.
|
|
(14)
|
Represents (i) 21,705,987
ordinary shares; (ii) 1,422,240 ordinary shares represented by 142,222 ADSs; (iii) 711,120
ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of warrants; (iv) 12,250,000 ordinary shares represented
by 122,500 ADSs issued in our March 2017 private placement; and (v) 12,500,000 ordinary
shares represented by 122,500 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants issued in our March
2017 private placement.
|
|
(15)
|
Represents (i) 12,250,000
ordinary shares represented by 122,500 ADSs issued in our March 2017 private placement
and (ii) 12,500,000 ordinary shares represented by 122,500 ADSs issuable upon exercise
of warrants issued in our March 2017 private placement.
|
|
(16)
|
Represents (i) 23,128,227
ordinary shares and (ii) 711,120 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of warrants.
|
|
(17)
|
Represents (i) 2,666,680
ordinary shares; (ii) 1,333,340 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of warrants; (iii)
2,500,000 ordinary shares represented by 25,000 ADSs issued in our March 2017 private
placement; and (iv) 2,500,000 ordinary shares represented by 25,000 ADSs issuable upon
exercise of warrants issued in our March 2017 private placement.
|
|
(18)
|
Represents (i) 2,500,000
ordinary shares represented by 25,000 ADSs issued in our March 2017 private placement
and (ii) 2,500,000 ordinary shares represented by 25,000 ADSs issuable upon exercise
of warrants issued in our March 2017 private placement.
|
|
(19)
|
Represents (i) 2,666,680
ordinary shares and (ii) 1,333,340 ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of warrants.
|
(20)
|
Benjamin
Guzman, chief executive officer of Costanza Private Wealth Management, holds sole voting and dispositive power over these
securities.
|
|
(21)
|
Represents (i) 10,000,000
ordinary shares represented by 100,000 ADSs issued in our March 2017 private placement
and (ii) 10,000,000 ordinary shares represented by 100,000 ADSs issuable upon exercise
of warrants issued in our March 2017 private placement
|
|
(22)
|
Represents (i) 800,000 ordinary
shares represented by 8,000 ADSs; (ii) 40,000 ordinary shares represented by 4,000 ADSs
issuable upon exercise of warrants; (iii) 3,500,000 ordinary shares represented by 35,000
ADSs issued in our March 2017 private placement; and (iv) 3,500,000 ordinary shares represented
by 35,000 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants issued in our March 2017 private placement.
|
|
(23)
|
Represents (i) 3,500,000
ordinary shares represented by 35,000 ADSs issued in our March 2017 private placement
and (ii) 3,500,000 ordinary shares represented by 35,000 ADSs issuable upon exercise
of warrants issued in our March 2017 private placement.
|
|
(24)
|
Represents (i) 800,000 ordinary
shares represented by 8,000 ADSs and (ii) 40,000 ordinary shares represented by 4,000
ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants.
|
|
(25)
|
Represents (i) 250,000 ordinary
shares represented by 2,500 ADSs issued in our March 2017 private placement;(ii) 250,000
ordinary shares represented by 2,500 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants issued in
our March 2017 private placement; and (iii) 380,075 ordinary shares which publicly trade
under the symbol “XTLB” on TASE.
|
|
(26)
|
Represents (i) 1,250,000
ordinary shares represented by 12,500 ADSs issued in our March 2017 private placement;
(ii) 1,250,000 ordinary shares represented by 12,500 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants
issued in our March 2017 private placement; (iii) 1,500,000 ordinary shares represented
by 15,000 ADSs; and (iv) 222,200 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants.
|
|
(27)
|
Represents (i) 4,250,000
ordinary shares represented by 42,500 ADSs issued in our March 2017 private placement
and (ii) 4,250,000 ordinary shares represented by 42,500 ADSs issuable upon exercise
of warrants issued in our March 2017 private placement.
|
|
(28)
|
Represents (i) 3,500,000
ordinary shares represented by 35,000 ADSs issued in our March 2017 private placement;
(ii) 3,500,000 ordinary shares represented by 35,000 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants
issued in our March 2017 private placement; (iii) 3,000,000 ordinary shares represented
by 30,000 ADSs; and (iv) 444,440 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants.
|
|
(29)
|
Represents (i) 1,750,000
ordinary shares represented by 17,500 ADSs issued in our March 2017 private placement
and (ii) 1,750,000 ordinary shares represented by 17,500 ADSs issuable upon exercise
of warrants issued in our March 2017 private placement.
|
|
(30)
|
Eschar Erez, chief executive
officer of Petrichor Ventures Limited Partners, holds sole voting and dispositive power
over these securities.
|
|
(31)
|
Represents (i) 3,250,000
ordinary shares represented by 32,500 ADSs issued in our March 2017 private placement
and (ii) 3,250,000 ordinary shares represented by 32,500 ADSs issuable upon exercise
of warrants issued in our March 2017 private placement.
|
|
(32)
|
Represents (i) 22,250,000
ordinary shares represented by 222,500 ADSs issued in our March 2017 private placement
and (ii) 22,250,000 ordinary shares represented by 222,500 ADSs issuable upon exercise
of warrants issued in our March 2017 private placement.
|
|
(33)
|
Represents (i) 7,000,000
ordinary shares represented by 70,000 ADSs issued in our March 2017 private placement
and (ii) 7,000,000 ordinary shares represented by 70,000 ADSs issuable upon exercise
of warrants issued in our March 2017 private placement.
|
|
(34)
|
Noked Capital Ltd., the
general partner of Noked Opportunity LP, has sole voting and dispositive power over these
securities. Roy Vermus, Michal Vermus, Shlomo Bracha and Ariel Chilkiyahu are each shareholders
of Noked Capital Ltd. As a result, each may be deemed to have beneficial ownership (as
determined under Section 13(d) of Exchange Act) of the securities reported herein that
are held by Noked Capital
|
|
(35)
|
Represents (i) 888,880 ordinary
shares represented by ADSs; (ii) 444,440 ordinary shares represented by ADSs issuable
upon exercise of warrants; (iii) 19,000,000 ordinary shares represented by 190,000 ADSs
issued in our March 2017 private placement; (iv) 19,000,000 ordinary shares represented
by 190,000 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants issued in our March 2017 private placement;
and (v) 2,714,904 ordinary shares purchased on the market.
|
|
(36)
|
Represents (i) 19,000,000
ordinary shares represented by 190,000 ADSs issued in our March 2017 private placement
and (ii) 19,000,000 ordinary shares represented by 190,000 ADSs issuable upon exercise
of warrants issued in our March 2017 private placement.
|
|
(37)
|
Represents (i) 888,880 ordinary
shares represented by ADSs and (ii) 444,440 ordinary shares represented by ADSs issuable
upon exercise of warrants.
|
|
(38)
|
Represents (i) 10,000,000
ordinary shares represented by 100,000 ADSs and (ii) 10,000,000 ordinary shares represented
by 10,000 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants issued in our March 2017 private placement.
Yair Morad, owner, holds sole voting and dispositive power over these securities.
|
|
(39)
|
Represents (i) 1,000,000
ordinary shares represented by 10,000 ADSs issued in our March 2017 private placement
and (ii) 1,000,000 ordinary shares represented by 10,000 ADSs issuable upon exercise
of warrants issued in our March 2017 private placement.
|
|
(40)
|
Gilai Dolev, chief executive
officer of Legos Consulting, holds sole voting and dispositive power over these securities.
|
|
(41)
|
The referenced person is
affiliated with H.C. Wainwright, a registered broker dealer.
|
|
(42)
|
Represents (i) 2,223,400
ordinary shares represented by 22,234 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants and (ii)
3,225,000 ordinary shares represented by 32,250 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants
issued in our February 2017 private placement.
|
|
(43)
|
Represents 3,225,000 ordinary
shares represented by 32,250 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants issued in our February
2017 private placement.
|
|
(44)
|
Represents 2,223,400 ordinary
shares represented by 22,234 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants.
|
|
(45)
|
Represents (i) 2,030,000
ordinary shares represented by 20,030 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants; and (ii)
1,575,000 ordinary shares represented by 15,750 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants
issued in our February 2017 private placement.
|
|
(46)
|
Represents 1,575,000 ordinary
shares represented by 15,750 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants issued in our February
2017 private placement.
|
|
(47)
|
Represents 2,030,000 ordinary
shares represented by 20,030 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants.
|
|
(48)
|
Represents (i) 193,400 ordinary
shares represented by 1,934 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants and (ii) 150,000
ordinary shares represented by 1,500 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants issued in
our February 2017 private placement.
|
|
(49)
|
Represents 150,000 ordinary
shares represented by 1,500 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants issued in our February
2017 private placement.
|
|
(50)
|
Represents 193,400 ordinary
shares represented by 1,934 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants
|
|
(51)
|
Represents (i) 64,500 ordinary
shares represented by 645 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants and (ii) 50,000 ordinary
shares represented by 500 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants issued in our February
2017 private placement.
|
|
(52)
|
Represents 50,000 ordinary
shares represented by 500 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants issued in our February
2017 private placement.
|
|
(53)
|
Represents 64,500 ordinary
shares represented by 645 ADSs issuable upon exercise of warrants.
|
DESCRIPTION OF
SHARE CAPITAL
The following description
of our share capital summarizes certain provisions of our Articles of Association. Such summaries do not purport to be complete
and are subject to, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to, all of the provisions of our Articles of Association,
copies of which have been filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.
Memorandum and Articles of Association
Objects and Purposes of the Company
Pursuant to Part B, Section 3 of our Articles
of Association, we may undertake any lawful activity.
Powers and Obligations of the Directors
Pursuant to the Israeli
Companies Law and our Articles of Association, a director is not permitted to vote on a proposal, arrangement or contract in which
he or she has a personal interest. Also, the directors may not vote on compensation to themselves or any members of their body,
as that term is defined under Israeli law, without the approval of our audit committee and our shareholders at a general meeting.
The power of our directors to enter into borrowing arrangements on our behalf is limited to the same extent as any other transaction
by us.
The Israeli Companies
Law codifies the fiduciary duties that office holders, including directors and executive officers, owe to a company. An office
holder’s fiduciary duties consist of a duty of care and a duty of loyalty. The duty of care generally requires an office
holder to act with the same level of care as a reasonable office holder in the same position would employ under the same circumstances.
The duty of loyalty includes avoiding any conflict of interest between the office holder’s position in the company and such
person’s personal affairs, avoiding any competition with the company, avoiding exploiting any corporate opportunity of the
company in order to receive personal advantage for such person or others, and revealing to the company any information or documents
relating to the company’s affairs which the office holder has received due to his or her position as an office holder.
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers; Limitations on Liability
Israeli
law permits a company to insure an office holder in respect of liabilities incurred by him or her as a result of an act or omission
in the capacity of an office holder for:
|
·
|
a
breach of the office holder’s duty of care towards the company or towards another
person;
|
|
·
|
a
breach of the office holder’s fiduciary duty to the company, provided that he or
she acted in good faith and had reasonable cause to believe that the act would not prejudice
the company; and
|
|
·
|
a
financial liability imposed upon the office holder in favor of another person.
|
|
·
|
A
financial liability imposed on the office holder's for all victims of the violation in
an Administrative Proceeding.
|
|
·
|
Expenses
incurred by the office holder's in connection with an Administrative Proceeding conducted
in his or her case, including litigation expenses and reasonable legal fees.
|
Moreover,
a company can indemnify an office holder for any of the following obligations or expenses incurred in connection with the acts
or omissions of such person in his or her capacity as an office holder:
|
·
|
monetary
liability imposed upon him or her in favor of a third party by a judgment, including
a settlement or an arbitral award confirmed by the court; and
|
|
·
|
reasonable
litigation expenses, including legal fees, actually incurred by the office holder or
imposed upon him or her by a court, in a proceeding brought against him or her by or
on behalf of the company or by a third party, or in a criminal action in which he or
she was acquitted, or in a criminal action which does not require criminal intent in
which he or she was convicted; furthermore, a company can, with a limited exception,
exculpate an office holder in advance, in whole or in part, from liability for damages
sustained by a breach of duty of care to the company.
|
|
·
|
financial
liability imposed on the office holder for all victims of the violation in an Administrative
Proceeding.
|
|
·
|
expenses
incurred by the office holder in connection with an Administrative Proceeding conducted
in his or her case, including litigation expenses and reasonable legal fees.
|
Our
Articles of Association allow for insurance, exculpation and indemnification of office holders to the fullest extent permitted
by law. We have entered into indemnification, insurance and exculpation agreements with our directors and executive officers,
following shareholder approval of these agreements. We have directors’ and officers’ liability insurance covering
our officers and directors for a claim imposed upon them as a result of an action carried out while serving as an officer or director,
for (a) the breach of duty of care towards us or towards another person, (b) the breach of fiduciary duty towards us, provided
that the officer or director acted in good faith and had reasonable grounds to assume that the action would not harm our interests,
and (c) a monetary liability imposed upon him in favor of a third party.
Approval
of Related Party Transactions under the Israeli Companies Law
Fiduciary
duties of the office holders
The
Israeli Companies Law imposes a duty of care and a duty of loyalty on all office holders of a company. The duty of care of an
office holder is based on the duty of care set forth in connection with the tort of negligence under the Israeli Torts Ordinance
(New Version) 5728-1968. This duty of care requires an office holder to act with the degree of proficiency with which a reasonable
office holder in the same position would have acted under the same circumstances. The duty of care includes a duty to use reasonable
means, in light of the circumstances, to obtain:
|
·
|
information
on the advisability of a given action brought for his or her approval or performed by
virtue of his or her position; and
|
|
·
|
All
other important information pertaining to these actions.
|
The
duty of loyalty requires an office holder to act in good faith and for the benefit of the company, and includes the duty to:
|
·
|
refrain
from any act involving a conflict of interest between the performance of his or her duties
in the company and his or her other duties or personal affairs;
|
|
·
|
refrain
from any activity that is competitive with the business of the company;
|
|
·
|
refrain
from exploiting any business opportunity of the company for the purpose of gaining a
personal advantage for himself or herself or others; and
|
|
·
|
disclose
to the company any information or documents relating to the company’s affairs which
the office holder received as a result of his or her position as an office holder.
|
We
may approve an act performed in breach of the duty of loyalty of an office holder provided that the office holder acted in good
faith, the act or its approval does not harm the company, and the office holder discloses his or her personal interest, as described
below.
Disclosure
of personal interests of an office holder and approval of acts and transactions
The
Israeli Companies Law requires that an office holder promptly disclose to the company any personal interest that he or she may
have and all related material information or documents relating to any existing or proposed transaction by the company. An interested
office holder’s disclosure must be made promptly and in any event no later than the first meeting of the board of directors
at which the transaction is considered. An office holder is not obligated to disclose such information if the personal interest
of the office holder derives solely from the personal interest of his or her relative in a transaction that is not considered
as an extraordinary transaction.
The
term personal interest is defined under the Israeli Companies Law to include the personal interest of a person in an action or
in the business of a company, including the personal interest of such person’s relative or the interest of any corporation
in which the person is an interested party, but excluding a personal interest stemming solely from the fact of holding shares
in the company. A personal interest furthermore includes the personal interest of a person for whom the office holder holds a
voting proxy or the interest of the office holder with respect to his or her vote on behalf of the shareholder for whom he or
she holds a proxy even if such shareholder itself has no personal interest in the approval of the matter. An office holder is
not, however, obligated to disclose a personal interest if it derives solely from the personal interest of his or her relative
in a transaction that is not considered an extraordinary transaction.
Under
the Israeli Companies Law, an extraordinary transaction which requires approval is defined any of the following:
|
·
|
a
transaction other than in the ordinary course of business;
|
|
·
|
a transaction that
is not on market terms; or
|
|
·
|
a transaction that
may have a material impact on the company’s profitability, assets or liabilities.
|
Under the Israeli
Companies Law, once an office holder has complied with the disclosure requirement described above, a company may approve a transaction
between the company and the office holder or a third party in which the office holder has a personal interest, or approve an action
by the office holder that would otherwise be deemed a breach of duty of loyalty. However, a company may not approve a transaction
or action that is adverse to the company’s interest or that is not performed by the office holder in good faith.
Under
the Companies Law, unless the articles of association of a company provide otherwise, a transaction with an office holder, a transaction
with a third party in which the office holder has a personal interest, and an action of an office holder that would otherwise
be deemed a breach of duty of loyalty requires approval by the board of directors. Our Articles of Association do not provide
otherwise. If the transaction or action considered is (i) an extraordinary transaction, (ii) an action of an office holder that
would otherwise be deemed a breach of duty of loyalty and may have a material impact on a company’s profitability, assets
or liabilities, (iii) an undertaking to indemnify or insure an office holder who is not a director, or (iv) for matters considered
an undertaking concerning the terms of compensation of an office holder who is not a director, including, an undertaking to indemnify
or insure such office holder, then approval by the audit committee is required prior to approval by the board of directors. Arrangements
regarding the compensation, indemnification or insurance of a director require the approval of the audit committee, board of directors
and shareholders, in that order.
A
director who has a personal interest in a matter that is considered at a meeting of the board of directors or the audit committee
may generally not be present at the meeting or vote on the matter, unless a majority of the directors or members of the audit
committee have a personal interest in the matter or the chairman of the audit committee or board of directors, as applicable,
determines that he or she should be present to present the transaction that is subject to approval. If a majority of the directors
have a personal interest in the matter, such matter would also require approval of the shareholders of the company.
Disclosure of personal interests of
a controlling shareholder and approval of transactions
Under
the Israeli Companies Law, the disclosure requirements that apply to an office holder also apply to a controlling shareholder
of a public company. See “Audit Committee” for a definition of controlling shareholder. Extraordinary transactions
with a controlling shareholder or in which a controlling shareholder has a personal interest, including a private placement in
which a controlling shareholder has a personal interest, as well as transactions for the provision of services whether directly
or indirectly by a controlling shareholder or his or her relative, or a company such controlling shareholder controls, and transactions
concerning the terms of engagement of a controlling shareholder or a controlling shareholder’s relative, whether as an office
holder or an employee, require the approval of the audit committee, the board of directors and a majority of the shares voted
by the shareholders of the company participating and voting on the matter in a shareholders’ meeting. In addition, such
shareholder approval must fulfill one of the following requirements:
|
·
|
at least a majority
of the shares held by shareholders who have no personal interest in the transaction and are voting at the meeting must be
voted in favor of approving the transaction, excluding abstentions; or
|
|
·
|
the shares voted
by shareholders who have no personal interest in the transaction who vote against the transaction represent no more than 2%
of the voting rights in the company.
|
To
the extent that any such transaction with a controlling shareholder is for a period extending beyond three years, approval is
required once every three years, unless the audit committee determines that the duration of the transaction is reasonable given
the circumstances related thereto.
Duties of
shareholders
Under
the Israeli Companies Law, a shareholder has a duty to refrain from abusing its power in the company and to act in good faith
and in an acceptable manner in exercising its rights and performing its obligations to the company and other shareholders, including,
among other things, voting at general meetings of shareholders on the following matters:
|
·
|
an amendment to
the articles of association;
|
|
·
|
an increase in the
company’s authorized share capital;
|
|
·
|
an increase in the
company’s authorized share capital; and
|
|
·
|
the approval of
related party transactions and acts of office holders that require shareholder approval.
|
A
shareholder also has a general duty to refrain from discriminating against other shareholders.
The
remedies generally available upon a breach of contract will also apply to a breach of the above mentioned duties, and in the event
of discrimination against other shareholders, additional remedies are available to the injured shareholder.
In
addition, any controlling shareholder, any shareholder that knows that its vote can determine the outcome of a shareholder vote
and any shareholder that, under a company’s articles of association, has the power to appoint or prevent the appointment
of an office holder, or has another power with respect to a company, is under a duty to act with fairness towards the company.
The Israeli Companies Law does not describe the substance of this duty except to state that the remedies generally available upon
a breach of contract will also apply in the event of a breach of the duty to act with fairness, taking the shareholder’s
position in the company into account.
Ordinary Shares
Rights Attached to Ordinary Shares
Through March 18,
2009, our authorized share capital was NIS 10,000,000 consisting of 500,000,000 ordinary shares, par value NIS 0.02 per share.
On March 18, 2009, pursuant to a shareholder’s meeting, the share capital of our company was consolidated and re-divided
so that each five (5) shares of NIS 0.02 nominal value was consolidated into one (1) share of NIS 0.1 nominal value so that following
such consolidation and re-division, our authorized share capital consisted of 100,000,000 ordinary shares, par value NIS 0.10
per share. In addition, the authorized share capital of our company was increased from NIS 10,000,000 to NIS 70,000,000 divided
into 700,000,000 ordinary shares, NIS 0.10 nominal value. The share consolidation was effected in June 22, 2009. Effective August
3, 2017, the authorized share capital of the company increased from NIS 70,000,000 divided into 700,000,000 ordinary shares to
NIS 145,000,000 divided into 1,450,000,000 ordinary shares.
Holders of ordinary
shares have one vote per share, and are entitled to participate equally in the payment of dividends and share distributions and,
in the event of our liquidation, in the distribution of assets after satisfaction of liabilities to creditors. No preferred shares
are currently authorized. All outstanding ordinary shares are validly issued and fully paid.
Transfer of Shares
Fully paid ordinary
shares are issued in registered form and may be freely transferred under our Articles of Association unless the transfer is restricted
or prohibited by another instrument or applicable securities laws.
Dividend and Liquidation Rights
We may declare a dividend
to be paid to the holders of ordinary shares according to their rights and interests in our profits. In the event of our liquidation,
after satisfaction of liabilities to creditors, our assets will be distributed to the holders of ordinary shares in proportion
to the nominal value of their holdings.
This right may be
affected by the grant of preferential dividend or distribution rights, to the holders of a class of shares with preferential rights
that may be authorized in the future. Under the Israeli Companies Law, the declaration of a dividend does not require the approval
of the shareholders of the company, unless the company’s articles of association require otherwise. Our Articles provide
that the Board of Directors may declare and distribute dividends without the approval of the shareholders.
Annual and Extraordinary General
Meetings
We must hold our annual
general meeting of shareholders each year and no later than 15 months from the last annual meeting, at a time and place determined
by the Board of Directors, upon at least 21 days’ prior notice to our shareholders, to which we need to add an additional
three days for notices sent outside of Israel. A special meeting may be convened by request of two directors, 25% of the directors
then in office, one or more shareholders holding at least 5% of our issued share capital and at least 1% of our issued voting
rights, or one or more shareholders holding at least 5% of our issued voting rights. Notice of a general meeting must set forth
the date, time and place of the meeting. Such notice must be given at least 21 days but not more than 45 days prior to the general
meeting. The quorum required for a meeting of shareholders consists of at least two shareholders present in person or by proxy
who hold or represent between them at least one-third of the voting rights in the company. A meeting adjourned for lack of a quorum
generally is adjourned to the same day in the following week at the same time and place (with no need for any notice to the shareholders)
or until such other later time if such time is specified in the original notice convening the general meeting, or if we serve
notice to the shareholders no less than seven days before the date fixed for the adjourned meeting. If at an adjourned meeting
there is no quorum present half an hour after the time set for the meeting, any number participating in the meeting shall represent
a quorum and shall be entitled to discuss the matters set down on the agenda for the original meeting. All shareholders who are
registered in our registrar on the record date, or who will provide us with proof of ownership on that date as applicable to the
relevant registered shareholder, are entitled to participate in a general meeting and may vote as described in “Voting Rights”
and “Voting by Proxy and in Other Manners,” below.
Voting Rights
Our ordinary shares
do not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors. As a result, the holders of ordinary shares that represent
more than 50% of the voting power represented at a shareholders meeting in which a quorum is present have the power to elect all
of our directors, except the external directors whose election requires a special majority.
Holders of ordinary
shares have one vote for each ordinary share held on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders. Shareholders may vote in
person or by proxy. These voting rights may be affected by the grant of any special voting rights to the holders of a class of
shares with preferential rights that may be authorized in the future.
Under the Israeli
Companies Law, unless otherwise provided in the Articles of Association or by applicable law, all resolutions of the shareholders
require a simple majority. Our Articles of Association provide that all decisions may be made by a simple majority. See “–Approval
of Certain Transactions” above for certain duties of shareholders towards the company.
Voting by Proxy and in Other Manners
Our Articles of Association
enable a shareholder to appoint a proxy, who need not be a shareholder, to vote at any shareholders meeting. We require that the
appointment of a proxy be in writing signed by the person making the appointment or by an attorney authorized for this purpose,
and if the person making the appointment is a corporation, by a person or persons authorized to bind the corporation. In the document
appointing a proxy, each shareholder may specify how the proxy should vote on any matter presented at a shareholders meeting.
The document appointing the proxy shall be deposited in our offices or at such other address as shall be specified in the notice
of the meeting not less than 48 hours before the time of the meeting at which the person specified in the appointment is due to
vote.
The Israeli Companies
Law and our Articles of Association do not permit resolutions of the shareholders to be adopted by way of written consent, for
as long as our ordinary shares are publicly traded.
Limitations on the Rights to Own
Securities
The ownership or voting
of ordinary shares by non-residents of Israel is not restricted in any way by our Articles of Association or the laws of the State
of Israel, except that nationals of countries which are, or have been, in a state of war with Israel may not be recognized as
owners of ordinary shares.
Anti-Takeover Provisions under Israeli
Law
The Israeli Companies
Law permits merger transactions with the approval of each party’s board of directors and shareholders. In accordance with
the Israeli Companies Law, a merger may be approved at a shareholders meeting by a majority of the voting power represented at
the meeting, in person or by proxy, and voting on that resolution. In determining whether the required majority has approved the
merger, shares held by the other party to the merger, any person holding at least 25% of the outstanding voting shares or means
of appointing the board of directors of the other party to the merger, or the relatives or companies controlled by these persons,
are excluded from the vote.
Under the Israeli
Companies Law, a merging company must inform its creditors of the proposed merger. Any creditor of a party to the merger may seek
a court order blocking the merger, if there is a reasonable concern that the surviving company will not be able to satisfy all
of the obligations of the parties to the merger. Moreover, a merger may not be completed until at least 30 days have passed from
the time the merger was approved in a general meeting of each of the merging companies, and at least 50 days have passed from
the time that a merger proposal was filed with the Israeli Registrar of Companies.
Israeli corporate
law provides that an acquisition of shares in a public company must be made by means of a tender offer if, as a result of such
acquisition, the purchaser would become a 25% or greater shareholder of the company. This rule does not apply if there is already
another shareholder with 25% or greater shares in the company. Similarly, Israeli corporate law provides that an acquisition of
shares in a public company must be made by means of a tender offer if, as a result of the acquisition, the purchaser’s shareholdings
would entitle the purchaser to over 45% of the shares in the company, unless there is a shareholder with 45% or more of the shares
in the company. These requirements do not apply if, in general, the acquisition (1) was made in a private placement that received
the approval of the company’s shareholders; (2) was from a 25% or greater shareholder of the company which resulted in the
purchaser becoming a 25% or greater shareholder of the company, or (3) was from a 45% or greater shareholder of the company which
resulted in the acquirer becoming a 45% or greater shareholder of the company. These rules do not apply if the acquisition is
made by way of a merger. Regulations promulgated under the Israeli Companies Law provide that these tender offer requirements
do not apply to companies whose shares are listed for trading external of Israel if, according to the law in the country in which
the shares are traded, including the rules and regulations of the stock exchange or which the shares are traded, either:
|
·
|
there is a limitation
on acquisition of any level of control of the company; or
|
|
·
|
the acquisition
of any level of control requires the purchaser to do so by means of a tender offer to the public.
|
The Israeli Companies
Law provides specific rules and procedures for the acquisition of shares held by minority shareholders, if the majority shareholder
holds more than 90% of the outstanding shares. If, as a result of an acquisition of shares, the purchaser will hold more than
90% of a company’s outstanding shares, the acquisition must be made by means of a tender offer for all of the outstanding
shares. If less than 5% of the outstanding shares are not tendered in the tender offer, all the shares that the purchaser offered
to purchase will be transferred to it. The Israeli Companies Law provides for appraisal rights if any shareholder files a request
in court within three months following the consummation of a full tender offer. If more than 5% of the outstanding shares are
not tendered in the tender offer, then the purchaser may not acquire shares in the tender offer that will cause his shareholding
to exceed 90% of the outstanding shares of the company. Israeli tax law treats specified acquisitions, including a stock-for-stock
swap between an Israeli company and a foreign company, less favorably than does U.S. tax law. These laws may have the effect of
delaying or deterring a change in control of us, thereby limiting the opportunity for shareholders to receive a premium for their
shares and possibly affecting the price that some investors are willing to pay for our securities.
Rights of Shareholders
Under the Israeli
Companies Law, our shareholders have the right to inspect certain documents and registers including the minutes of general meetings,
the register of shareholders and the register of substantial shareholders, any document held by us that relates to an act or transaction
requiring the consent of the general meeting as stated above under “Approval of Certain Transactions,” our Articles
of Association and our financial statements, and any other document which we are required to file under the Israeli Companies
Law or under any law with the Registrar of Companies or the Israeli Securities Authority, and is available for public inspection
at the Registrar of Companies or the Securities Authority, as the case may be.
If the document required
for inspection by one of our shareholders relates to an act or transaction requiring the consent of the general meeting as stated
above, we may refuse the request of the shareholder if in our opinion the request was not made in good faith, the documents requested
contain a commercial secret or a patent, or disclosure of the documents could prejudice our good in some other way.
The Israeli Companies
Law provides that with the approval of the court any of our shareholders or directors may file a derivative action on our behalf
if the court finds the action is a priori, to our benefit, and the person demanding the action is acting in good faith. The demand
to take action can be filed with the court only after it is serviced to us, and we decline or omit to act in accordance to this
demand.
Enforceability of Civil Liabilities
We are incorporated
in Israel and most of our directors and officers and the Israeli experts named in this
prospectus
reside outside the U.S.
Service of process upon them may be difficult to effect within the U.S. Furthermore, because substantially all of our assets,
and those of our non-U.S. directors and officers and the Israeli experts named herein, are located outside the U.S., any judgment
obtained in the U.S. against us or any of these persons may not be collectible within the U.S.
We have been informed
by our legal counsel in Israel, Doron Tikotsky Kantor Gutman & Amit Gross, that there is doubt as to the enforceability of
civil liabilities under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, pursuant to original actions instituted in Israel. However, subject
to particular time limitations, executory judgments of a U.S. court for monetary damages in civil matters may be enforced by an
Israeli court, provided that:
|
·
|
the judgment was
obtained after due process before a court of competent jurisdiction, that recognizes and enforces similar judgments of Israeli
courts, and the court had authority according to the rules of private international law currently prevailing in Israel;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
adequate service
of process was effected and the defendant had a reasonable opportunity to be heard;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
the judgment is
not contrary to the law, public policy, security or sovereignty of the State of Israel and its enforcement is not contrary
to the laws governing enforcement of judgments;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
the judgment was
not obtained by fraud and does not conflict with any other valid judgment in the same matter between the same parties;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
the judgment is
no longer appealable; and
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
an action between
the same parties in the same matter is not pending in any Israeli court at the time the lawsuit is instituted in the foreign
court.
|
Foreign judgments
enforced by Israeli courts generally will be payable in Israeli currency. The usual practice in an action before an Israeli court
to recover an amount in a non-Israeli currency is for the Israeli court to render judgment for the equivalent amount in Israeli
currency at the rate of exchange in force on the date of the judgment. Under existing Israeli law, a foreign judgment payable
in foreign currency may be paid in Israeli currency at the rate of exchange for the foreign currency published on the day before
date of payment. Current Israeli exchange control regulations also permit a judgment debtor to make payment in foreign currency.
Pending collection, the amount of the judgment of an Israeli court stated in Israeli currency ordinarily may be linked to Israel’s
consumer price index plus interest at the annual statutory rate set by Israeli regulations prevailing at that time. Judgment creditors
must bear the risk of unfavorable exchange rates.
American Depositary
Shares
We
have issued and deposited ordinary shares with Bank Hapoalim B.M., The Bank of New York’s custodian in Tel Aviv, Israel.
The Bank of New York in turn issued American Depositary Shares, or ADSs, representing American Depositary Shares, or ADSs. One
ADS represents an ownership interest in one hundred of our ordinary shares. Each ADS also represents securities, cash or other
property deposited with The Bank of New York but not distributed to ADS holders. The Bank of New York’s Corporate Trust
Office is located at 101 Barclay Street, New York, NY 10286, U.S.A. Their principal executive office is located at One Wall Street,
New York, NY 10286, U.S.A.
You
may hold ADSs either directly or indirectly through your broker or other financial institution. If you hold ADSs directly, you
are an ADS holder. This description assumes you hold your ADSs directly. If you hold the ADSs indirectly, you must rely on the
procedures of your broker or other financial institution to assert the rights of ADS holders described in this section. You should
consult with your broker or financial institution to find out what those procedures are.
Because
The Bank of New York will actually hold the ordinary shares, you must rely on it to exercise the rights of a shareholder. The
obligations of The Bank of New York are set out in a deposit agreement among us, The Bank of New York and you, as an ADS holder.
The agreement and the ADSs are generally governed by New York law.
The
following is a summary of the agreement. Because it is a summary, it does not contain all the information that may be important
to you. For more complete information, you should read the entire agreement and the ADS. Directions on how to obtain copies of
these are provided in the section entitled “Available Information.”
Share Dividends and Other Distributions
The Bank of New York
has agreed to pay to you the cash dividends or other distributions it or the custodian receives on shares or other deposited securities
after deducting its fees and expenses. You will receive these distributions in proportion to the number of shares your ADSs represent.
Cash.
The
Bank of New York will convert any cash dividend or other cash distribution we pay on the shares into U.S. dollars, if it can do
so on a reasonable basis and can transfer the U.S. dollars to the U.S. If that is not possible or if any approval from any government
or agency thereof is needed and cannot be obtained, the agreement allows The Bank of New York to distribute the foreign currency
only to those ADS holders to whom it is possible to do so. It will hold the foreign currency it cannot convert for the account
of the ADS holders who have not been paid. It will not invest the foreign currency and it will not be liable for the interest.
Before
making a distribution, any withholding taxes that must be paid under U.S. law will be deducted. The Bank of New York will distribute
only whole U.S. dollars and cents and will round fractional cents to the nearest whole cent. If the exchange rates fluctuate during
a time when The Bank of New York cannot convert the foreign currency, you may lose some or all of the value of the distribution.
Shares.
The
Bank of New York may distribute new ADSs representing any shares we may distribute as a dividend or free distribution, if we furnish
it promptly with satisfactory evidence that it is legal to do so. The Bank of New York will only distribute whole ADSs. It will
sell shares which would require it to use a fractional ADS and distribute the net proceeds in the same way as it does with cash.
If The Bank of New York does not distribute additional ADSs, each ADS will also represent the new shares.
Rights
to receive additional shares
. If we offer holders of our ordinary shares any rights to subscribe for additional shares or
any other rights, The Bank of New York may make these rights available to you. We must first instruct The Bank of New York to
do so and furnish it with satisfactory evidence that it is legal to do so. If we do not furnish this evidence and/or give these
instructions, and The Bank of New York decides it is practical to sell the rights, The Bank of New York will sell the rights and
distribute the proceeds, in the same way as it does with cash. The Bank of New York may allow rights that are not distributed
or sold to lapse. In that case, you will receive no value for them. If The Bank of New York makes rights available to you, upon
instruction from you, it will exercise the rights and purchase the shares on your behalf. The Bank of New York will then deposit
the shares and issue ADSs to you. It will only exercise rights if you pay it the exercise price and any other charges the rights
require you to pay.
U.S.
securities laws may restrict the sale, deposit, cancellation and transfer of the ADSs issued after exercise of rights. For example,
you may not be able to trade the ADSs freely in the U.S. In this case, The Bank of New York may issue the ADSs under a separate
restricted deposit agreement which will contain the same provisions as the agreement, except for the changes needed to put the
restrictions in place.
Other
Distributions
. The Bank of New York will send to you anything else we distribute on deposited securities by any means it thinks
is legal, fair and practical. If it cannot make the distribution in that way, The Bank of New York has a choice. It may decide
to sell what we distributed and distribute the net proceeds in the same way as it does with cash or it may decide to hold what
we distributed, in which case the ADSs will also represent the newly distributed property.
The
Bank of New York is not responsible if it decides that it is unlawful or impractical to make a distribution available to any ADS
holders. We have no obligation to register ADSs, shares, rights or other securities under the Securities Act. We also have no
obligation to take any other action to permit the distribution of ADSs, shares, rights or anything else to ADS holders. This means
that you may not receive the distribution we make on our shares or any value for them if it is illegal or impractical for us to
make them available to you.
Deposit, Withdrawal and Cancellation
The Bank of New York
will issue ADSs if you or your broker deposits shares or evidence of rights to receive shares with the custodian upon payment
of its fees and expenses and of any taxes or charges, such as stamp taxes or stock transfer taxes or fees. The Bank of New York
will register the appropriate number of ADSs in the names you request and will deliver the ADSs at its office to the persons you
request.
You may turn in your
ADSs at The Bank of New York’s office. Upon payment of its fees and expenses and of any taxes or charges, such as stamp
taxes or stock transfer taxes or fees, The Bank of New York will deliver (1) the underlying shares to an account designated by
you and (2) any other deposited securities underlying the ADS at the office of the custodian; or, at your request, risk and expense,
The Bank of New York will deliver the deposited securities at its office.
Voting Rights
You may instruct The
Bank of New York to vote the shares underlying your ADSs but only if we ask The Bank of New York to ask for your instructions.
Otherwise, you will not be able to exercise your right to vote unless you withdraw the shares. However, you may not know about
the meeting enough in advance to withdraw the shares.
If we ask for your
instructions, The Bank of New York will notify you of the upcoming vote and arrange to deliver our voting materials to you. The
materials will (1) describe the matters to be voted on and (2) explain how you, on a certain date, may instruct The Bank of New
York to vote the shares or other deposited securities underlying your ADSs as you direct. For instructions to be valid, The Bank
of New York must receive them on or before the date specified. The Bank of New York will try, as far as practical, subject to
Israeli law and the provisions of our Articles of Association, to vote or to have its agents vote the shares or other deposited
securities as you instruct. The Bank of New York will only vote or attempt to vote as you instruct. However, if The Bank of New
York does not receive your voting instructions, it will deem you to have instructed it to give a discretionary proxy to vote the
shares underlying your ADSs to a person designated by us provided that no such instruction shall be deemed given and no such discretionary
proxy shall be given with respect to any matter as to which we inform The Bank of New York that (x) we do not wish such proxy
given, (y) substantial opposition exists, (z) such matter materially affects the rights of the holders of the shares underlying
the ADSs.
We cannot assure you
that you will receive the voting materials in time to ensure that you can instruct The Bank of New York to vote your shares. In
addition, The Bank of New York and its agents are not responsible for failing to carry out voting instructions or for the manner
of carrying out voting instructions. This means that you may not be able to exercise your right to vote and there may be nothing
you can do if your shares are not voted as you requested.
Rights of Non-Israeli Shareholders
to Vote
The ADSs may be freely
held and traded pursuant to the General Permit and the Currency Control Law. The ownership or voting of ADSs by non-residents
of Israel is not restricted in any way by our Articles of Association or by the laws of the State of Israel.
Fees and Expenses
ADS holders must pay:
|
|
For:
|
$5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs
(or portion thereof)
|
|
Each issuance of an ADS, including
as a result of a distribution of shares or rights or other property.
Each cancellation of an ADS, including
if the agreement terminates.
|
|
|
|
$0.05 (or less) per ADS
|
|
Any cash payment.
|
|
|
|
Registration or
Transfer Fees
|
|
Transfer and registration
of shares on the share register of the Foreign Registrar from your name to the name of The Bank of New York or its agent when
you deposit or withdraw shares.
|
|
|
|
Expenses of The
Bank of New York
|
|
Conversion of foreign currency
to U.S. dollars.
Cable, telex and facsimile transmission
expenses.
Servicing of shares or deposited
securities.
|
|
|
|
$0.02 (or less)
per ADS per calendar year (if the depositary has not collected any cash distribution fee during that year)
|
|
Depositary services.
|
|
|
|
Taxes and other
governmental charges
|
|
As necessary The
Bank of New York or the Custodian have to pay on any ADS or share underlying an ADS, for example, stock transfer taxes, stamp
duty or withholding taxes.
|
|
|
|
A fee equivalent
to the fee that would be payable if securities distributed to you had been ordinary shares and the ordinary shares had been
deposited for issuance of ADSs
|
|
Distribution of
securities distributed to holders of deposited securities which are distributed by the depositary to ADS holders.
|
Payment of Taxes
You will be responsible
for any taxes or other governmental charges payable on your ADSs or on the deposited securities underlying your ADSs. The Bank
of New York may refuse to transfer your ADSs or allow you to withdraw the deposited securities underlying your ADSs until such
taxes or other charges are paid. It may apply payments owed to you or sell deposited securities underlying your ADSs to pay any
taxes owed and you will remain liable for any deficiency. If it sells deposited securities, it will, if appropriate, reduce the
number of ADSs to reflect the sale and pay to you any proceeds, or send to you any property, remaining after it has paid the taxes.
Reclassifications, Recapitalizations and Mergers
If
we:
|
|
Then:
|
Change the nominal or par value of our shares;
|
|
The cash, shares
or other securities received by The Bank of New York will become deposited securities. Each ADS will automatically represent
its equal share of the new deposited securities. The Bank of New York may, and will if we ask it to, distribute some or all
of the cash, shares or other securities it received. It may also issue new ADSs or ask you to surrender your outstanding ADSs
in exchange for new ADSs, identifying the new deposited securities.
|
|
|
|
Reclassify, split up or consolidate any of the
deposited securities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribute securities on the shares that are
not distributed to you; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recapitalize, reorganize, merge, liquidate,
sell all or substantially all of our assets, or takes any similar action.
|
|
|
Amendment and Termination
We may agree with
The Bank of New York to amend the agreement and the ADSs without your consent for any reason. If the amendment adds or increases
fees or charges, except for taxes and other governmental charges or registration fees, cable, telex or facsimile transmission
costs, delivery costs or other such expenses, or prejudices an important right of ADS holders, it will only become effective thirty
days after The Bank of New York notifies you of the amendment. At the time an amendment becomes effective, you are considered,
by continuing to hold your ADS, to agree to the amendment and to be bound by the ADSs and the agreement is amended.
The Bank of New York
will terminate the agreement if we ask it to do so. The Bank of New York may also terminate the agreement if The Bank of New York
has told us that it would like to resign and we have not appointed a new depositary bank within ninety days. In both cases, The
Bank of New York must notify you at least ninety days before termination.
After termination,
The Bank of New York and its agents will be required to do only the following under the agreement: (1) advise you that the agreement
is terminated, and (2) collect distributions on the deposited securities and deliver shares and other deposited securities upon
cancellation of ADSs. After termination, The Bank of New York will, if practical, sell any remaining deposited securities by public
or private sale. After that, The Bank of New York will hold the proceeds of the sale, as well as any other cash it is holding
under the agreement for the pro rata benefit of the ADS holders that have not surrendered their ADSs. It will not invest the money
and will have no liability for interest. The Bank of New York’s only obligations will be to account for the proceeds of
the sale and other cash. After termination our only obligations will be with respect to indemnification and to pay certain amounts
to The Bank of New York.
Limitations
on Obligations and Liability to ADS Holders
The
agreement expressly limits our obligations and the obligations of The Bank of New York, and it limits our liability and the liability
of The Bank of New York. We and The Bank of New York:
|
·
|
are
only obligated to take the actions specifically set forth in the agreement without negligence
or bad faith;
|
|
·
|
are
not liable if either is prevented or delayed by law or circumstances beyond their control
from performing their obligations under the agreement;
|
|
·
|
are
not liable if either exercises discretion permitted under the agreement;
|
|
·
|
have
no obligation to become involved in a lawsuit or other proceeding related to the ADSs
or the agreement on your behalf or on behalf of any other party; and
|
|
·
|
may
rely upon any documents they believe in good faith to be genuine and to have been signed
or presented by the proper party.
|
In
the agreement, we and The Bank of New York agree to indemnify each other under certain circumstances.
Requirements
for Depositary Actions
Before
The Bank of New York will issue or register transfer of an ADS, make a distribution on an ADS, or make a withdrawal of shares,
The Bank of New York may require payment of stock transfer or other taxes or other governmental charges and transfer or registration
fees charged by third parties for the:
|
·
|
transfer
of any shares or other deposited securities;
|
|
·
|
production
of satisfactory proof of the identity and genuineness of any signature or other information
it deems necessary, and
|
|
·
|
compliance
with regulations it may establish, from time to time, consistent with the agreement,
including presentation of transfer documents.
|
The
Bank of New York may refuse to deliver, transfer, or register transfers of ADSs generally when the books of The Bank of New York
or our books are closed, or at any time if The Bank of New York or we think it advisable to do so. You have the right to cancel
your ADSs and withdraw the underlying shares at any time except:
|
·
|
when
temporary delays arise because: (1) The Bank of New York or we have closed its transfer
books; (2) the transfer of shares is blocked to permit voting at a shareholders’
meeting; or (3) we are paying a dividend on the shares; or
|
|
·
|
when
it is necessary to prohibit withdrawals in order to comply with any laws or governmental
regulations that apply to ADSs or to the withdrawal of shares or other deposited securities.
|
This
right of withdrawal may not be limited by any other provision of the agreement.
Pre-Release of ADSs
In certain circumstances,
subject to the provisions of the agreement, The Bank of New York may issue ADSs before deposit of the underlying shares. This
is called a pre-release of the ADS. The Bank of New York may also deliver shares upon cancellation of pre-released ADSs (even
if the ADSs are cancelled before the pre-release transaction has been closed out). A pre-release is closed out as soon as the
underlying shares are delivered to The Bank of New York. The Bank of New York may receive ADSs instead of shares to close out
a pre-release. The Bank of New York may pre-release ADSs only under the following conditions: (1) before or at the time of the
pre-release, the person to whom the pre-release is being made must represent to The Bank of New York in writing that it or its
customer owns the shares or ADSs to be deposited; (2) the pre-release must be fully collateralized with cash or other collateral
that The Bank of New York considers appropriate; and (3) The Bank of New York must be able to close out the pre-release on not
more than five business days’ notice. In addition, The Bank of New York will limit the number of ADSs that may be outstanding
at any time as a result of prerelease, although The Bank of New York may disregard the limit from time to time, if it thinks it
is appropriate to do so.
Inspection of Books of the Depositary
Under the terms of
the agreement, holders of ADSs may inspect the transfer books of the depositary at any reasonable time, provided that such inspection
shall not be for the purpose of communicating with holders of ADSs in the interest of a business or object other than either our
business or a matter related to the deposit agreement or ADSs.
Book-Entry Only Issuance - The Depository
Trust Company
The Depository Trust
Company, or DTC, New York, New York, will act as securities depository for the ADSs. The ADSs will be represented by one global
security that will be deposited with and registered in the name of Cede & Co. (DTC’s partnership nominee), or such other
name as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. This means that we will not issue certificates to you for the
ADSs. One global security will be issued to DTC, which will keep a computerized record of its participants (for example, your
broker) whose clients have purchased the ADSs. Each participant will then keep a record of its clients. Unless it is exchanged
in whole or in part for a certificated security, a global security may not be transferred. However, DTC, its nominees, and their
successors may transfer a global security as a whole to one another. Beneficial interests in the global security will be shown
on, and transfers of the global security will be made only through, records maintained by DTC and its participants.
DTC is a limited-purpose
trust company organized under the New York Banking Law, a “banking organization” within the meaning of the New York
Banking Law, a member of the United States Federal Reserve System, a “clearing corporation” within the meaning of
the New York Uniform Commercial Code and a “clearing agency” registered under the provisions of Section 17A of the
Exchange Act. DTC holds securities that its participants (direct participants) deposit with DTC. DTC also records the settlement
among direct participants of securities transactions, such as transfers and pledges, in deposited securities through computerized
records for direct participant’s accounts. This eliminates the need to exchange certificates. Direct participants include
securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations and certain other organizations.
DTC’s book-entry
system is also used by other organizations such as securities brokers and dealers, banks and trust companies that work through
a direct participant. The rules that apply to DTC and its participants are on file with the SEC.
DTC is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation, or DTCC. DTCC is, in turn, owned by a number of DTC’s direct
participants and by the New York Stock Exchange, Inc., the American Stock Exchange, Inc. and the National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.
When you purchase
ADSs through the DTC system, the purchases must be made by or through a direct participant, who will receive credit for the ADSs
on DTC’s records. Since you actually own the ADSs, you are the beneficial owner and your ownership interest will only be
recorded on the direct (or indirect) participants’ records. DTC has no knowledge of your individual ownership of the ADSs.
DTC’s records only show the identity of the direct participants and the amount of ADSs held by or through them. You will
not receive a written confirmation of your purchase or sale or any periodic account statement directly from DTC. You will receive
these from your direct (or indirect) participant. Thus the direct (or indirect) participants are responsible for keeping accurate
account of the holdings of their customers like you.
We will wire dividend
payments to DTC’s nominee, and we will treat DTC’s nominee as the owner of the global security for all purposes. Accordingly,
we will have no direct responsibility or liability to pay amounts due on the global security to you or any other beneficial owners
in the global security.
Any redemption notices
will be sent by us directly to DTC, who will in turn inform the direct participants, who will then contact you as a beneficial
holder.
It is DTC’s
current practice, upon receipt of any payment of dividends or liquidation amount, to credit direct participants’ accounts
on the payment date based on their holdings of beneficial interests in the global securities as shown on DTC’s records.
In addition, it is DTC’s current practice to assign any consenting or voting rights to direct participants whose accounts
are credited with preferred securities on a record date, by using an omnibus proxy. Payments by participants to owners of beneficial
interests in the global securities, and voting by participants, will be based on the customary practices between the participants
and owners of beneficial interests, as is the case with the ADSs held for the account of customers registered in “street
name.” However, payments will be the responsibility of the participants and not of DTC or us.
ADSs
represented by a global security will be exchangeable for certificated securities with the same terms in authorized denominations
only if:
|
·
|
DTC
is unwilling or unable to continue as depositary or if DTC ceases to be a clearing agency
registered under applicable law and a successor depositary is not appointed by us within
90 days; or
|
|
·
|
we
determine not to require all of the ADSs to be represented by a global security.
|
If
the book-entry only system is discontinued, the transfer agent will keep the registration books for the ADSs at its corporate
office.
The information in
this section concerning DTC and DTC’s book-entry system has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, but we
take no responsibility for the accuracy thereof.
TAXATION
The following discussion
summarizes certain Israeli and U.S. federal income tax consequences that may be material to our shareholders, but is not intended,
and should not be construed, as legal or professional tax advice and does not exhaust all possible tax considerations that may
be relevant to holders of our ordinary shares. This discussion is based on existing law, judicial authorities and administrative
interpretations, all of which are subject to change or differing interpretations, possibly with retroactive effect. This summary
does not purport to be a complete analysis of all potential tax consequences of owning our ordinary shares. In particular, this
discussion does not take into account the specific circumstances of any particular holder or holders who may be subject to special
rules, such as tax-exempt entities, broker-dealers, shareholders subject to Alternative Minimum Tax, shareholders that actually
or constructively own 10% or more of our voting securities, shareholders that hold ordinary shares or ADSs as part of straddle
or hedging or conversion transaction, traders in securities that elect mark to market, banks and other financial institutions
or partnerships or other pass-through entities. The following tax considerations are not relevant to employees of the company
or any controlling shareholders. The tax aspects do not include reference to the Encouragement of Capital Investments Law and
the Encouragement of Industry Taxes Law.
We urge shareholders
to consult their own tax advisors as to the potential U.S., Israeli, or other tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and
disposition of ordinary shares and ADSs, including, in particular, the effect of any foreign, state or local taxes. For purposes
of the entire Taxation discussion, we refer to ordinary shares and ADSs collectively as ordinary shares.
Israeli Tax Considerations
The following discussion
refers to the current tax law applicable to companies in Israel, with special reference to its effect on us. This discussion also
includes specified Israeli tax consequences to holders of our ordinary shares and Israeli Government programs benefiting us. This
summary does not discuss all the aspects of Israeli income tax law that may be relevant to a particular investor in light of his
or her personal investment circumstances or to some types of investors subject to special treatment under Israeli law. Examples
of this kind of investor include residents of Israel or traders in securities who are subject to special tax regimes not covered
in this discussion. To the extent that the discussion is based on new tax legislation that has not yet been subject to judicial
or administrative interpretation, we cannot assure you that the appropriate tax authorities or the courts will accept the views
expressed in this discussion. This summary is based on laws and regulations in effect as of the date of this prospectus and does
not take into account possible future amendments which may be under consideration."
Corporate Tax Rate
The corporate tax
rate in Israel was 26.5%, 26.5% and 25% for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
In December 2016,
the Israeli Parliament approved the Economic Efficiency Law (Legislative Amendments for Applying the Economic Policy for the 2017
and 2018 Budget Years), 2016 which reduces the corporate income tax rate to 24% (instead of 25%) effective from January 1, 2017
and to 23% effective from January 1, 2018 and thereafter.
Capital gains derived
by an Israeli resident company are generally subject to tax at the same rate as the corporate tax rate. Under Israeli tax legislation,
a corporation will be considered as an “Israeli Resident” if it meets one of the following: (a) it was incorporated
in Israel; or (b) the control and management of its business are exercised in Israel.
Tax Benefits for Research and Development
Israeli tax law allows,
under specific conditions, a tax deduction in the year incurred for expenditures, including capital expenditures, relating to
scientific research and development projects, if the expenditures are approved by the relevant Israeli government ministry, determined
by the field of research, and the research and development is for the promotion of the company and is carried out by or on behalf
of the company seeking the deduction. Expenditures not so approved are deductible over a three-year period. In the past, expenditures
that were made out of proceeds made available to us through government grants were automatically deducted during a one year period.
Israeli Estate and Gift Taxes
Israel law presently
does not impose estate or gift taxes.
Capital Gains Tax on Sales of our Ordinary Shares by
Both Residents and Non-Residents of Israel
The Israeli Income
Tax Ordinance of 1961 (New Version), or the Ordinance, generally imposes a capital gains tax on the sale of capital assets either
(i) located in Israel; (ii) are shares or a right to a share in an Israeli resident corporation, or (iii) the sold asset is abroad
and it essentially represent, directly or indirectly, rights to assets located in Israel, , by both residents and non-residents
of Israel, unless a specific exemption is available or unless a treaty between Israel and the country of the non-resident provides
otherwise. The law distinguishes between the inflationary surplus and the real capital gain. The inflationary surplus is the portion
of the total capital gain, which is equivalent to the increase of the relevant asset’s purchase price attributable to the
increase in the Israeli consumer price index from the date of purchase to the date of sale. The real capital gain is the excess
of the total capital gain over the inflationary surplus. A non-resident that invests in taxable assets with foreign currency may
elect to calculate the inflationary amount by using such foreign currency.
Non-Israeli residents
are generally exempt from Israeli capital gains tax on any gains derived from the sale of shares publicly traded on a stock exchange
recognized by the Israeli Ministry of Finance (including the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange and Nasdaq), provided such shareholders did
not acquire their shares prior to an initial public offering and that such capital gains are not derived by a permanent establishment
of the foreign resident in Israel. Notwithstanding the foregoing, dealers in securities in Israel are taxed at the regular tax
rates applicable to business income. However, Non-Israeli corporations will not be entitled to such exemption if an Israeli resident
(1) has, directly, or indirectly, along or together with another, a controlling interest of 25% or more of the means of control
in such non-Israeli corporation, or (2) is the beneficiary of, or is entitled to, 25% or more of the revenue or profits of such
non-Israeli corporation, whether directly or indirectly. In such case the sale, exchange or disposition of ordinary shares would
be subject to Israeli tax, to the extant applicable.
In addition, pursuant
to the Convention Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Israel with Respect to Taxes on
Income, as amended (the “United States- Israel Tax Treaty”), the sale, exchange or disposition of ordinary shares
by a person who qualifies as a resident of the U.S. within the meaning of the United States-Israel Tax Treaty and who is entitled
to claim the benefits afforded to such person by the United States- Israel Tax Treaty (a “Treaty United States Resident”)
generally will not be subject to the Israeli capital gains tax unless such Treaty United States Resident holds, directly or indirectly,
shares representing 10% or more of our voting power during any part of the twelve- month period preceding such sale, exchange
or disposition, subject to certain conditions or if the capital gains from such sale are considered as business income attributable
to a permanent establishment of the U.S. resident in Israel. However, under the United States-Israel Tax Treaty, such “Treaty
United States Resident” would be permitted to claim a credit for such taxes against the U.S. federal income tax imposed
with respect to such sale, exchange or disposition, subject to the limitations in U.S. laws applicable to foreign tax credits.
The income tax
rate applicable to real capital gain (capital gain less inflationary surplus) derived by an Israeli individual from the sale of
our ordinary shares, is 25%. However, if such shareholder is considered a “Substantial Shareholder” (as defined below)
at the time of sale or at any time during the preceding 12-month period, such gain will be taxed at the rate of 30%.
Real capital gains
derived by a shareholder who is a dealer or trader in securities, or to whom such income is otherwise taxable as ordinary business
income instead of capital gain which , are taxed in Israel at the marginal tax rates applicable to business income (up to50% for
individuals, including Excess Tax). With respect to the above mentioned, VAT implication may be applicable. A “substantial
shareholder” is defined as someone who alone, or together with another person, holds, directly or indirectly, at least 10%
in one or all of any of the means of control in the corporation (including, among other things, the right to receive profits of
the company, voting rights, the right to receive the company's liquidation proceeds and the right to appoint a director). With
respect to Israeli tax resident corporate investors, capital gains tax at the regular corporate rate will be imposed on such taxpayers
on the sale of traded shares.
Either the purchaser,
the Israeli stockbrokers or financial institution through which the shares are held is obliged, subject to the above mentioned
exemptions, to withhold tax in the amount of consideration (applicable to individual) paid upon the sale of securities (or the
Real Capital Gain realized on the sale applicable company, if known) at the Israeli corporate tax rate (23% in 2018 and thereafter)
or 25% in case the seller is an individual.
At the sale of
securities traded on a stock exchange a detailed return, including a computation of the tax due, must be filed and an advanced
payment must be paid on January 31 and June 30 of every tax year in respect of sales of securities made within the previous six
months. However, if all tax due was withheld at source according to applicable provisions of the Ordinance and regulations promulgated
thereunder the aforementioned return need not be filed and no advance payment must be paid. Capital gain is also reportable on
the annual income tax return.
Excess Tax
Individuals who
are subject to tax in Israel, are also subject to an additional tax on annual income exceeding NIS 640,000 in 2018 at a rate of
3%, including, but not limited to, income derived from dividends, interest and capital gain.
Taxation of Dividends
Israeli tax resident
individuals or non-Israeli resident individuals are generally subject to Israeli income tax on the receipt of dividends paid on
our ordinary Shares at the rate of 25% or 30%, if such recipient is a “substantial shareholders" at the time receiving
the dividend or on any date in the 12 months preceding such date, unless a lower tax rate is provided in a tax treaty between
Israel and the shareholder's country of residence and if a certificate for a reduce withholding tax rate would be provided in
advance from the Israeli Tax Authority.
Payers of dividends
on our common shares, including the Israeli stockbroker effectuating the transaction, or the financial institution through which
the securities are held, are generally required, subject to any of the foregoing exemptions, reduced tax rates and the demonstration
of a shareholder regarding his, her or its foreign residency, and subject to a certificate for a reduced withholding tax rate
from the Israeli tax authority, to withhold tax upon the distribution of dividend at the rate of 25%, so long as the shares are
registered with a Nominee Company (for corporations and individuals).
Under the U.S.-Israel
Tax Treaty, the maximum Israeli tax and withholding tax on dividends paid to a holder of ordinary shares who is a resident of
the U.S. is generally 25%, but is reduced to 12.5% if the dividends are paid to a U.S. corporation that holds in excess of 10%
of the voting rights of a company during the company’s taxable year preceding the distribution of the dividend and the portion
of the company’s taxable year in which the dividend was distributed as well as during the previous tax year, provided than
not more than 25% of the gross income for such preceding year (if any) consists of certain types of interest or dividends and
if a certificate for a reduced withholding tax rate is obtained in advance from the Israeli tax authority.
A non-resident
of Israel who has dividend income derived from or accrued in Israel, from which full tax was withheld at the source, is generally
exempt from the duty to file tax returns in Israel in respect of such income, provided such income was not derived from a business
conducted in Israel by the taxpayer and the taxpayer has no other taxable sources of income in Israel with respect to which a
tax return is required to be filed.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE
WITH U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT CIRCULAR 230, PROSPECTIVE HOLDERS OF ORDINARY SHARES ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT: (A) ANY DISCUSSION
OF U.S. FEDERAL TAX ISSUES IN THIS MEMORANDUM IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN TO BE RELIED UPON, AND CANNOT BE RELIED UPON, BY HOLDERS
OF ORDINARY SHARES FOR THE PURPOSE OF AVOIDING PENALTIES THAT MAY BE IMPOSED ON SUCH HOLDERS UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF
1986, AS AMENDED (THE “CODE”); (B) SUCH DISCUSSION IS WRITTEN IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROMOTION OR MARKETING OF THE
TRANSACTIONS OR MATTERS ADDRESSED HEREIN; AND (C) PROSPECTIVE HOLDERS OF ORDINARY SHARES SHOULD SEEK ADVICE BASED ON THEIR PARTICULAR
CIRCUMSTANCES FROM AN INDEPENDENT TAX ADVISOR.
The following discussion
applies only to a holder of our ordinary shares who qualifies as a “U.S. holder”. For purposes of this discussion
a “U.S. holder” is a beneficial owner of our ordinary shares that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
·
|
an
individual who is a U.S. citizen or U.S. resident alien;
|
|
·
|
a corporation (or
other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) that was created or organized under the laws of
the U.S., any state thereof or the District of Columbia;
|
|
·
|
an estate whose
income is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
|
|
·
|
a trust (i) if a
U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more “United States
persons” (as defined in the Code) have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust, or (ii) if the
trust has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to be treated as a “United States person.”
|
This discussion
is based on current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which we refer to as the Code, current and proposed
Treasury regulations promulgated under the Code, and administrative and judicial decisions as of the date of this
prospectus
, all of which are subject to change or differing interpretation, possibly on a retroactive basis. This discussion does not
address any aspect of state, local or non-U.S. tax laws. Except where noted, this discussion addresses only those holders who
hold our shares as capital assets. This discussion does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations
that may be relevant to U.S. holders entitled to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax laws, for example, financial
institutions, insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations and broker/dealers, and it does not address all aspects of U.S. federal
income taxation that may be relevant to any particular shareholder based on the shareholder’s individual circumstances.
In particular, this discussion does not address the potential application of the alternative minimum tax, or the special U.S.
federal income tax rules applicable in special circumstances, including to U.S. holders who:
|
·
|
have elected mark-to-market
accounting;
|
|
·
|
hold our ordinary
shares as part of a straddle, hedge or conversion transaction with other investments;
|
|
·
|
own directly, indirectly
or by attribution at least 10% of our voting power;
|
|
·
|
are tax exempt entities;
|
|
·
|
are persons who
acquire shares in connection with employment or other performance of services; and
|
|
·
|
have a functional
currency that is not the U.S. dollar.
|
Additionally, this
discussion does not consider the tax treatment of partnerships or persons who hold ordinary shares through a partnership or other
pass-through entity or the possible application of U.S. federal gift or estate taxes.
EACH PROSPECTIVE
SHAREHOLDER IS URGED TO CONSULT ITS TAX ADVISOR REGARDING THE PARTICULAR TAX CONSEQUENCES TO SUCH HOLDER OF OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION
OF OUR SHARES, AS WELL AS ANY TAX CONSEQUENCES THAT MAY ARISE UNDER THE LAWS OF ANY OTHER RELEVANT FOREIGN, STATE, LOCAL, OR OTHER
TAXING JURISDICTION.
Taxation of Distributions Paid on
Ordinary Shares
Subject to the
description of the passive foreign investment company rules below, a U.S. holder will be required to include in gross income as
ordinary income from sources outside of the U.S. the amount of any distribution paid on ordinary shares, including any Israeli
taxes withheld from the amount paid, to the extent the distribution is paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits
as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Distributions in excess of these earnings and profits will be applied against
and will reduce the U.S. holder’s basis in the ordinary shares and, to the extent in excess of this basis, will be treated
as gain from the sale or exchange of ordinary shares. We do not expect to maintain calculations of our earnings and profits under
U.S. federal income tax principles and, therefore, U.S. holder should expect that the entire amount of any distribution generally
will be reported as dividend income.
On December 22,
2017, President Trump signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or the TCJA. The TCJA provides a 100% deduction for the foreign-source
portion of dividends received from “specified 10-percent owned foreign corporations” by U.S. corporate holders, subject
to a one-year holding period. No foreign tax credit, including Israeli withholding tax (or deduction for foreign taxes paid with
respect to qualifying dividends) would be permitted for foreign taxes paid or accrued with respect to a qualifying dividend. Deduction
would be unavailable for “hybrid dividends.” The dividend received deduction enacted under the TCJA may not apply
to dividends from a passive foreign investment company, as discussed below.
Certain dividend income
may be eligible for a reduced rate of taxation. Dividend income will be taxed to a non-corporate holder at the applicable long-term
capital gains rate if the dividend is received from a “qualified foreign corporation,” and the shareholder of such
foreign corporation holds such stock for more than 60 days during the 121 day period that begins on the date that is 60 days before
the ex-dividend date for the stock. The holding period is tolled for any days on which the shareholder has reduced his risk of
loss with respect to the stock. A “qualified foreign corporation” is either a corporation that is eligible for the
benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the U.S. or a corporation whose stock, the shares of which are with respect
to any dividend paid by such corporation, is readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States (including,
for this purpose, ADSs traded on a securities market in the United States with respect to the foreign corporation’s shares).
However, a foreign corporation will not be treated as a “qualified foreign corporation” if it is a passive foreign
investment company (as discussed below) for the year in which the dividend was paid or the preceding year. Distributions of current
or accumulated earnings and profits paid in foreign currency to a U.S. holder will be includible in the income of a U.S. holder
in a U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the day the distribution is received by the
U.S. holder (or, in the case of ADSs, on the day the distribution is received by the depository). A U.S. holder that receives
a foreign currency distribution and converts the foreign currency into U.S. dollars subsequent to receipt will have foreign exchange
gain or loss based on any appreciation or depreciation in the value of the foreign currency against the U.S. dollar, which will
generally be U.S. source ordinary income or loss.
As described above,
we will generally be required to withhold Israeli income tax from any dividends paid to holders who are not residents of Israel.
See “- Israeli Tax Considerations—Taxation of Dividends” above.
With respect to
certain non-corporate U.S. Holders, including individual U.S. Holders, dividends may be taxed at the lower capital gain rates
applicable to “qualified dividend income,” provided (1) our ordinary shares are readily tradable on an established
securities market in the United States (such as Nasdaq), (2) we are neither a PFIC nor treated as such with respect to you (as
discussed above) for either the taxable year in which the dividend was paid or the preceding taxable year, (3) certain holding
period requirements are met and (4) you are not under an obligation to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially
similar or related property. As discussed above under “Passive foreign investment company,” there is a significant
risk that we will be a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and, as a result, the qualified dividend rate may be unavailable
with respect to dividends we pay.
The amount of any
distribution paid in a currency other than U.S. dollars will be equal to the U.S. dollar value of such currency on the date such
distribution is includible in your income, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars at that time.
The amount of any distribution of property other than cash will be the fair market value of such property on the date of distribution.
Any dividends will
constitute foreign source income for foreign tax credit limitation purposes. If the dividends are taxed as qualified dividend
income (as discussed above), the amount of the dividend taken into account for purposes of calculating the foreign tax credit
limitation will in general be limited to the gross amount of the dividend, multiplied by the reduced tax rate applicable to qualified
dividend income and divided by the highest tax rate normally applicable to dividends. The limitation on foreign taxes eligible
for credit is calculated separately with respect to specific classes of income. For this purpose, dividends distributed by us
with respect to our ordinary shares will generally constitute “passive category income” but could, in the case of
certain U.S. Holders, constitute “general category income.”
If Israeli withholding
taxes apply to any dividends paid to you with respect to our ordinary shares, subject to certain conditions and limitations, such
withholding taxes may be treated as foreign taxes eligible for credit against your U.S. federal income tax liability. Instead
of claiming a credit, you may elect to deduct such taxes in computing taxable income, subject to applicable limitations. If a
refund of the tax withheld is available under the applicable laws of Israel or under the Israel-U.S. income tax treaty (the “Treaty”),
the amount of tax withheld that is refundable will not be eligible for such credit against your U.S. federal income tax liability
(and will not be eligible for the deduction against your U.S. federal taxable income). The rules relating to the determination
of the foreign tax credit are complex, and you should consult your tax advisor regarding the availability of a foreign tax credit
in your particular circumstances, including the effects of the Treaty.
Special rules, described
below, apply if we are a passive foreign investment company.
Taxation of the Disposition of Ordinary
Shares
Subject to the description
of the passive foreign investment company rules below, upon the sale, exchange or other disposition of our ordinary shares, a
U.S. holder will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the U.S. holder’s basis in
the ordinary shares, which is usually the cost of those shares, and the amount realized on the disposition. Capital gain from
the sale, exchange or other disposition of ordinary shares held more than one year is long-term capital gain and is eligible for
a reduced rate of taxation for non-corporate holders. In general, gain realized by a U.S. holder on a sale, exchange or other
disposition of ordinary shares generally will be treated as U.S. source income for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. A loss realized
by a U.S. holder on the sale, exchange or other disposition of ordinary shares is generally allocated to U.S. source income. However,
regulations require the loss to be allocated to foreign source income to the extent certain dividends were received by the taxpayer
within the 24-month period preceding the date on which the taxpayer recognized the loss. The deductibility of a loss realized
on the sale, exchange or other disposition of ordinary shares is subject to limitations for both corporate and individual shareholders.
A U.S. holder that
uses the cash method of accounting calculates the U.S. dollar value of the proceeds received from a sale of ordinary shares as
of the date that the sale settles, and will generally have no additional foreign currency gain or loss on the sale, while a U.S.
holder that uses the accrual method of accounting is required to calculate the value of the proceeds of the sale as of the trade
date and may therefore realize foreign currency gain or loss, unless the U.S. holder has elected to use the settlement date to
determine its proceeds of sale for purposes of calculating this foreign currency gain or loss. In addition, a U.S. holder that
receives foreign currency upon disposition of our ordinary shares and converts the foreign currency into U.S. dollars subsequent
to receipt will have foreign exchange gain or loss based on any appreciation or depreciation in the value of the foreign currency
against the U.S. dollar, which will generally be U.S. source ordinary income or loss.
Tax Consequences if we are a Passive
Foreign Investment Company
Special federal
income tax rules apply to the timing and character of income received by a U.S. holder of a PFIC. We will be a PFIC if either
75% or more of our gross income in a tax year is passive income or the average percentage of our assets (by value) that produce
or are held for the production of passive income in a tax year is at least 50%. The IRS has indicated that cash balances, even
if held as working capital, are considered to be assets that produce passive income. Therefore, any determination of PFIC status
will depend upon the sources of our income, and the relative values of passive and non- passive assets, including goodwill. Furthermore,
because the goodwill of a publicly-traded corporation is largely a function of the trading price of its shares, the valuation
of that goodwill is subject to significant change throughout each year. A determination as to a corporation’s status as
a PFIC must be made annually. We believe we may be a PFIC during 2017 and although we have not determined whether we will be a
PFIC in 2018, or in any subsequent year, our operating results for any such years may cause us to be a PFIC. Although we may not
be a PFIC in any one year, the PFIC taint remains with respect to those years in which we were or are a PFIC and the special PFIC
taxation regime will continue to apply.
If we are classified
as a PFIC, a special tax regime would apply to both (a) any “excess distribution” by us (generally, the U.S. holder’s
ratable share of distributions in any year that are greater than 125% of the average annual distributions received by such U.S.
holder in the three preceding years or its holding period, if shorter) and (b) any gain recognized on the sale or other disposition
of your ordinary shares. Under this special regime, any excess distribution and recognized gain would be treated as ordinary income
and the federal income tax on such ordinary income would be determined as follows: (i) the amount of the excess distribution or
gain would be allocated ratably over the U.S. holder’s holding period for our ordinary shares; (ii) U.S. federal income
tax would be determined for the amounts allocated to the first year in the holding period in which we were classified as a PFIC
and for all subsequent years (except the year in which the excess distribution was received or the sale occurred) by applying
the highest applicable tax rate in effect in the year to which the income was allocated; (iii) an interest charge would be added
to this tax, calculated by applying the underpayment interest rate to the tax for each year determined under the preceding sentence
from the due date of the income tax return for such year to the due date of the return for the year in which the excess distribution
or sale occurs; and (iv) amounts allocated to a year prior to the first year in the U.S. holder’s holding period in which
we were classified as a PFIC or to the year in which the excess distribution or the disposition occurred would be taxed as ordinary
income but without the imposition of an interest charge.
A U.S. holder may
generally avoid the PFIC “excess distribution” regime by electing to treat his PFIC shares as a “qualified electing
fund.” If a U.S. holder elects to treat PFIC shares as a qualified electing fund, also known as a “QEF Election,”
the U.S. holder must include annually in gross income (for each year in which PFIC status is met) his
pro rata
share of
the PFIC’s ordinary earnings and net capital gains, whether or not such amounts are actually distributed to the U.S. holder.
A U.S. holder may make a QEF Election with respect to a PFIC for any taxable year in which he was a shareholder. A QEF Election
is effective for the year in which the election is made and all subsequent taxable years of the U.S. holder. Procedures exist
for both retroactive elections and the filing of protective statements. A U.S. holder making the QEF Election must make the election
on or before the due date, as extended, for the filing of the U.S. holder’s income tax return for the first taxable year
to which the election will apply.
A QEF Election is
made on a shareholder-by-shareholder basis. A U.S. holder must make a QEF Election by completing Form 8621, Return by a Shareholder
of a Passive Foreign Investment Company or Qualified Electing Fund, and attaching it to the holder’s timely filed U.S. federal
income tax return.
Alternatively, a U.S.
holder may also generally avoid the PFIC regime by making a so-called “mark-to-market” election. Such an election
may be made by a U.S. holder with respect to ordinary shares owned at the close of such holder’s taxable year, provided
that we are a PFIC and the ordinary shares are considered “marketable stock.” The ordinary shares will be marketable
stock if they are regularly traded on a national securities exchange that is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
or the national market system established pursuant to section 11A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or an equivalent regulated
and supervised foreign securities exchange.
If a U.S. holder were
to make a mark-to-market election with respect to ordinary shares, such holder generally will be required to include in its annual
gross income the excess of the fair market value of the PFIC shares at year-end over such shareholder’s adjusted tax basis
in the ordinary shares. Such amounts will be taxable to the U.S. holder as ordinary income, and will increase the holder’s
tax basis in the ordinary shares. Alternatively, if in any year, a United States holder’s tax basis exceeds the fair market
value of the ordinary shares at year-end, then the U.S. holder generally may take an ordinary loss deduction to the extent of
the aggregate amount of ordinary income inclusions for prior years not previously recovered through loss deductions and any loss
deductions taken will reduce the shareholder’s tax basis in the ordinary shares. Gains from an actual sale or other disposition
of the ordinary shares with a “mark-to-market” election will be treated as ordinary income, and any losses incurred
on an actual sale or other disposition of the ordinary shares will be treated as an ordinary loss to the extent of any prior “unreversed
inclusions” as defined in Section 1296(d) of the Code.
The mark-to-market
election is made on a shareholder-by-shareholder basis. The mark-to-market election is made by completing Form 8621, Return by
a Shareholder of a Passive Foreign Investment Company or Qualified Electing Fund, and attaching it to the holder’s timely
filed U.S. federal income tax return for the year of election. Such election is effective for the taxable year for which made
and all subsequent years until either (a) the ordinary shares cease to be marketable stock or (b) the election is revoked with
the consent of the IRS.
In view of the
complexity of the issues regarding our treatment as a PFIC, U.S. shareholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors for
guidance as to our status as a PFIC.
Information Reporting and Back-Up
Withholding
U.S. holders generally
are subject to information reporting requirements with respect to dividends paid in the U.S. on ordinary shares. Existing regulations
impose information reporting and back-up withholding on dividends paid in the U.S. on ordinary shares and on proceeds from the
disposition of ordinary shares unless the U.S. holder provides IRS Form W-9 or otherwise establishes an exemption.
Prospective investors
should consult their tax advisors concerning the effect, if any, of these Treasury regulations on an investment in ordinary shares.
Back-up withholding is not an additional tax. The amount of any back-up withholding will be allowed as a credit against a holder’s
U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle the holder to a refund, provided that specified required information is furnished
to the IRS on a timely basis.
PLAN
OF DISTRIBUTION
We
are registering the ordinary shares represented by ADSs and the ordinary shares represented by ADSs issuable upon exercise of
the warrants issued in our February 2017 and March 2017 private placements to permit the resale of these ordinary shares represented
by ADSs from time to time after the date of this prospectus. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale by the selling
shareholders of the ordinary shares represented by ADSs other than proceeds from the cash exercise of the warrants. We will bear
all fees and expenses incident to our obligation to register the ordinary shares represented by ADSs.
The
selling shareholders may sell all or a portion of the ordinary shares represented by ADSs beneficially owned by them and offered
hereby from time to time directly or through one or more underwriters, broker-dealers or agents. If the ordinary shares represented
by ADSs are sold through underwriters or broker-dealers, the selling shareholders will be responsible for underwriting discounts
or commissions or agent's commissions. The ordinary shares represented by ADSs may be sold in one or more transactions at fixed
prices, at prevailing market prices at the time of the sale, at varying prices determined at the time of sale, or at negotiated
prices. These sales may be effected in transactions, which may involve crosses or block transactions,
|
●
|
on any national
securities exchange or quotation service on which the securities may be listed or quoted at the time of sale;
|
|
●
|
in the over-the-counter market;
|
|
●
|
in transactions otherwise than on these exchanges
or systems or in the over-the-counter market;
|
|
●
|
through the writing of options, whether such
options are listed on an options exchange or otherwise;
|
|
●
|
ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions
in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;
|
|
●
|
block trades
in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as
principal to facilitate the transaction;
|
|
●
|
purchases by a broker-dealer as principal
and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;
|
|
●
|
an exchange distribution in accordance with
the rules of the applicable exchange;
|
|
●
|
privately negotiated transactions;
|
|
●
|
sales pursuant to Rule 144;
|
|
●
|
broker-dealers
may agree with the selling securityholders to sell a specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share;
|
|
●
|
a combination of any such methods of sale;
and
|
|
●
|
any other method permitted pursuant to applicable
law.
|
If
the selling shareholders effect such transactions by selling ordinary shares represented by ADSs to or through underwriters, broker-dealers
or agents, such underwriters, broker-dealers or agents may receive commissions in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions
from the selling shareholders or commissions from purchasers of the ordinary shares represented by ADSs for whom they may act
as agent or to whom they may sell as principal (which discounts, concessions or commissions as to particular underwriters, broker-dealers
or agents may be in excess of those customary in the types of transactions involved). In connection with sales of ordinary shares
represented by ADSs or otherwise, the selling shareholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers, which may
in turn engage in short sales of the ordinary shares represented by ADSs in the course of hedging in positions they assume. The
selling shareholders may also sell ordinary shares represented by ADSs short and deliver ordinary shares represented by ADSs covered
by this prospectus to close out short positions and to return borrowed shares in connection with such short sales. The selling
shareholders may also loan or pledge ordinary shares represented by ADSs to broker-dealers that in turn may sell such shares.
The
selling shareholders may pledge or grant a security interest in some or all of the warrants or ADSs owned by them and, if they
default in the performance of their secured obligations, the pledgees or secured parties may offer and sell the ordinary shares
represented by ADSs from time to time pursuant to this prospectus or any amendment to this prospectus under Rule 424(b)(3) or
other applicable provision of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, amending, if necessary, the list of selling shareholders
to include the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest as selling shareholders under this prospectus. The selling
shareholders also may transfer and donate the ordinary shares represented by ADSs in other circumstances in which case the transferees,
donees, pledgees or other successors in interest will be the selling beneficial owners for purposes of this prospectus.
The
selling shareholders and any broker-dealer participating in the distribution of the ordinary shares represented by ADSs may be
deemed to be "underwriters" within the meaning of the Securities Act, and any commission paid, or any discounts or concessions
allowed to, any such broker-dealer may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. At the
time a particular offering of the ordinary shares represented by ADSs is made, a prospectus supplement, if required, will be distributed
which will set forth the aggregate amount of ordinary shares represented by ADSs being offered and the terms of the offering,
including the name or names of any broker-dealers or agents, any discounts, commissions and other terms constituting compensation
from the selling shareholders and any discounts, commissions or concessions allowed or reallowed or paid to broker-dealers.
Under
the securities laws of some states ordinary shares represented by ADSs may be sold in such states only through registered or licensed
brokers or dealers. In addition, in some states ordinary shares represented by ADSs may not be sold unless such ordinary shares
have been registered or qualified for sale in such state or an exemption from registration or qualification is available and is
complied with.
There
can be no assurance that any selling shareholder will sell any or all of the ordinary shares represented by ADSs registered pursuant
to the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part.
The
selling shareholders and any other person participating in such distribution will be subject to applicable provisions of the Exchange
Act, and the rules and regulations thereunder, including, without limitation, Regulation M of the Exchange Act, which may limit
the timing of purchases and sales of any of the ordinary shares represented by ADSs by the selling shareholders and any other
participating person. Regulation M may also restrict the ability of any person engaged in the distribution of the ordinary shares
represented by ADSs to engage in market-making activities with respect to the ordinary shares represented by ADSs. All of the
foregoing may affect the marketability of the ordinary shares represented by ADSs and the ability of any person or entity to engage
in market-making activities with respect to the ordinary shares represented by ADSs.
We
will pay all expenses of the registration of the ordinary shares represented by ADSs, estimated to be $50,000 in total, including,
without limitation, Securities and Exchange Commission filing fees and expenses of compliance with state securities or "blue
sky" laws; provided, however, that a selling shareholder will pay all underwriting discounts and selling commissions, if
any.
Once
sold under the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part, the ordinary shares represented by ADSs will be
freely tradable in the hands of persons other than our affiliates.
EXPERTS
The financial statements
as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016 included in this prospectus
have been so included in reliance on the report of Kesselman & Kesselman, Israel CPAs, a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers
International Limited, an independent registered accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in accounting
and auditing.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of
the ordinary shares represented by ADSs being offered by this prospectus and other legal matters concerning this offering relating
to Israeli law will be passed upon for us by Doron Tikotzky Kantor Gutman & Amit Gross., Bnei Brak, Israel. Certain legal
matters under United States law relating to this offering will be passed upon for us by Sichenzia Ross Ference Kesner LLP, New
York, New York.
INDEMNIFICATION
FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES
Insofar as indemnification
for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling persons pursuant
to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, we have been informed that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against
public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.
ENFORCEABILITY
OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS
We are incorporated
under the laws of the State of Israel. Service of process upon us, our Israeli subsidiaries, our directors and officers and the
Israeli experts, if any, named in this prospectus, substantially all of whom reside outside the United States, may be difficult
to obtain within the United States. Furthermore, because the majority of our assets and investments, and substantially all of
our directors, officers and such Israeli experts, if any, are located outside the United States, any judgment obtained in the
United States against us or any of them may be difficult to collect within the United States.
We have been informed
by our legal counsel in Israel that it may also be difficult to assert U.S. securities law claims in original actions instituted
in Israel. Israeli courts may refuse to hear a claim based on an alleged violation of U.S. securities laws reasoning that Israel
is not the most appropriate forum to bring such a claim. In addition, even if an Israeli court agrees to hear a claim, it may
determine that Israeli law and not U.S. law is applicable to the claim. There is little binding case law in Israel addressing
these matters. If U.S. law is found to be applicable, the content of applicable U.S. law must be proved as a fact, which can be
a time-consuming and costly process. Certain matters of procedure will also be governed by Israeli law.
Subject to specified
time limitations and legal procedures, under the rules of private international law currently prevailing in Israel, Israeli courts
may enforce a U.S. judgment in a civil matter, including a judgment based upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. securities
laws, as well as a monetary or compensatory judgment in a non-civil matter, provided that the following conditions are met:
|
·
|
subject to limited exceptions, the judgment
is final and non-appealable;
|
|
·
|
the judgment was given by a court competent
under the laws of the state of the court and is otherwise enforceable in such state;
|
|
·
|
the judgment was rendered by a court competent
under the rules of private international law applicable in Israel;
|
|
·
|
the laws of the state in which the judgment
was given provide for the enforcement of judgments of Israeli courts;
|
|
·
|
adequate service of process has been effected
and the defendant has had a reasonable opportunity to present his arguments and evidence;
|
|
·
|
the judgment and its enforcement are not contrary
to the law, public policy, security or sovereignty of the State of Israel;
|
|
·
|
the judgment was not obtained by fraud and does
not conflict with any other valid judgment in the same matter between the same parties; and
|
|
·
|
an action between the same parties in the same
matter was not pending in any Israeli court at the time the lawsuit was instituted in the U.S. court.
|
We have appointed
Corporation Trust Company as our agent to receive service of process in any action against us in any United States federal or
state court arising out of this offering or any purchase or sale of securities in connection with this offering.
If a foreign judgment
is enforced by an Israeli court, it generally will be payable in Israeli currency, which can then be converted into non-Israeli
currency and transferred out of Israel. The usual practice in an action before an Israeli court to recover an amount in a non-Israeli
currency is for the Israeli court to issue a judgment for the equivalent amount in Israeli currency at the rate of exchange in
force on the date of the judgment, but the judgment debtor may make payment in foreign currency. Pending collection, the amount
of the judgment of an Israeli court stated in Israeli currency ordinarily will be linked to the Israeli consumer price index plus
interest at the annual statutory rate set by Israeli regulations prevailing at the time. Judgment creditors must bear the risk
of unfavorable exchange rates.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
We have filed with
the SEC a registration statement on Form F-1, including amendments and relevant exhibits and schedules, under the Securities Act
covering the ordinary shares represented by ADSs to be sold in this offering. This prospectus, which constitutes a part of the
registration statement, summarizes material provisions of contracts and other documents that we refer to in the prospectus. Since
this prospectus does not contain all of the information contained in the registration statement, you should read the registration
statement and its exhibits and schedules for further information with respect to us and our ordinary shares and the ADSs. You
may review and copy the registration statement, reports and other information we file at the SEC's public reference room at 100
F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may also request copies of these documents upon payment of a duplicating fee by writing
to the SEC. For further information on the public reference facility, please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Our SEC filings,
including the registration statement, are also available to you on the SEC's Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
In addition, since
our ordinary shares are traded on the TASE, in the past we filed Hebrew language periodic and immediate reports with, and furnished
information to, the TASE and the Israel Securities Authority, or the ISA, as required under Chapter Six of the Israel Securities
Law, 1968. Copies of our SEC filings and submissions are submitted to the Israeli Securities Authority and TASE. Such copies can
be retrieved electronically through the MAGNA distribution site of the Israeli Securities Authority (www.magna.isa.gov.il) and
the TASE website (maya.tase.co.il).
We are subject to
the information reporting requirements of the Exchange Act that are applicable to foreign private issuers, and under those requirements
we file reports with the SEC. Those other reports or other information may be inspected without charge at the locations described
above. As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the rules under the Exchange Act related to the furnishing and content
of proxy statements, and our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit
recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, we are not required under the Exchange Act to file
annual, quarterly and current reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as United States companies
whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act. However, we anticipate filing with the SEC, within four months after the
end of each fiscal year, an Annual Report on Form 20-F containing financial statements audited by an independent accounting firm.
We also file with the SEC Current Reports on Form 6-K.
We also maintain a
website at
http://www.xtlbio.com
, but information contained on our website does not constitute a part of this prospectus
and is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus.
INCORPORATION
BY REFERENCE
We
are allowed to incorporate by reference the information we file with the SEC, which means that we can disclose important information
to you by referring to those documents. The information incorporated by reference is considered to be part of this prospectus.
We incorporate by reference in this prospectus the documents listed below:
|
(1)
|
Our Annual Report
on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2016 filed with the SEC on April 4, 2017;
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Our Form 6-Ks
filed with the SEC on April 4, 2017, April 5, 2017, April 27, 2017, June 15, 2017, June 22, 2017, July 27, 2017, August 3,
2017, September 12, 2017, September 26, 2017,October 23, 2017, 2017, November 27, 2017 and December 6, 2017; and
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
The description
of our ADSs and ordinary shares contained in our Form 8-A filed with the SEC on July 11, 2013 including any amendment or report
filed for the purpose of updating such description.
|
The
information relating to us contained in this prospectus does not purport to be comprehensive and should be read together with
the information contained in the documents incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by reference in this prospectus.
As
you read the above documents, you may find inconsistencies in information from one document to another. If you find inconsistencies
between the documents and this prospectus, you should rely on the statements made in the most recent document. All information
appearing in this prospectus is qualified in its entirety by the information and financial statements, including the notes thereto,
contained in the documents incorporated by reference herein.
We
will provide to each person, including any beneficial owner, to whom this prospectus is delivered, a copy of these filings, at
no cost, upon written or oral request to us at the following address:
|
XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd.
5 Badner St.,
Ramat Gan 5218102, Israel
Tel: (972) 3-6116600
|
You
also may access the incorporated reports and other documents referenced above on our website at
www.canfite.com
. The
information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not part of this prospectus.
You
should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus or a prospectus supplement. We
have not authorized any other person to provide you with different information. If anyone provides you with different
or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not making an offer to sell these securities in any
jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. You should assume that the information appearing in this prospectus is
accurate only as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus, or such earlier date, that is indicated in this prospectus.
Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date.
XTL
BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016
INDEX
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the shareholders of
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS
LTD.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
statements of financial position of XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd and its subsidiary as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related
consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2016. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s Board of Directors and management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.
An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the Company’s Board of Directors
and management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial
statements referred to above, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd.
and its subsidiary as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2016 in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)
as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”).
|
/s/
Kesselman
& Kesselman
|
Tel-Aviv, Israel
|
Kesselman & Kesselman
|
March 30, 2017
|
Certified Public Accountants (lsr.)
|
|
A member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited
|
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS
LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF FINANCIAL POSITION
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
6
|
|
|
2,019
|
|
|
|
3,817
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
7
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
Other accounts receivable
|
|
8
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,754
|
|
|
|
4,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted deposit
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
10
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
1,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
3,017
|
|
|
|
5,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
11
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Other accounts payable
|
|
12
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY ATTRIBUTABLE TO EQUITY HOLDERS OF THE COMPANY:
|
|
15, 16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital - ordinary shares of NIS 0.1 par value: authorized
- December 31, 2016 and 2015 - 700,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016 and 2015 - 274,205,799 and 273,525,799 shares,
respectively
|
|
|
|
|
6,624
|
|
|
|
6,606
|
|
Premium on shares, options and warrants
|
|
|
|
|
150,784
|
|
|
|
150,748
|
|
Reserve from transactions with non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
|
|
(154,904
|
)
|
|
|
(152,487
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
|
|
2,687
|
|
|
|
4,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
|
|
3,017
|
|
|
|
5,323
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
Shlomo Shalev
|
|
Josh Levine
|
|
David Kestenbaum
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Date of approval of the financial statements by the Company’s
Board of Directors: March 30, 2017.
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS
LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
|
|
|
|
Year ended December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
(except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
17
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
(578
|
)
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
18
|
|
|
(1,270
|
)
|
|
|
(1,419
|
)
|
|
|
(1,744
|
)
|
Impairment of intangible assets
|
|
10
|
|
|
(848
|
)
|
|
|
(1,604
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other losses
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
(2,561
|
)
|
|
|
(3,611
|
)
|
|
|
(2,022
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance income
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Finance expenses
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance income (expenses), net
|
|
19
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
|
|
(3,622
|
)
|
|
|
(2,119
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
5
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(689
|
)
|
|
|
(746
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss
|
|
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
|
|
(4,311
|
)
|
|
|
(2,865
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the Company
|
|
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
|
|
(4,313
|
)
|
|
|
(2,527
|
)
|
Non-controlling interests from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss
|
|
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
|
|
(4,311
|
)
|
|
|
(2,865
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the fair value of available-for-sale financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Realized gain from sale available-for-sale financial
assets
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
*)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
(2,382
|
)
|
|
|
(4,311
|
)
|
|
|
(2,865
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the Company
|
|
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
|
|
(4,313
|
)
|
|
|
(2,527
|
)
|
Non-controlling interests from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
|
|
(4,311
|
)
|
|
|
(2,865
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the Company
|
|
|
|
|
(2,382
|
)
|
|
|
(4,313
|
)
|
|
|
(2,527
|
)
|
Non-controlling interests from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,382
|
)
|
|
|
(4,311
|
)
|
|
|
(2,865
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
(0.009
|
)
|
|
|
(0.014
|
)
|
|
|
(0.009
|
)
|
From discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(0.003
|
)
|
|
|
(0.002
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share for the period
|
|
|
|
|
(0.009
|
)
|
|
|
(0.017
|
)
|
|
|
(0.011
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of issued ordinary shares
|
|
|
|
|
274,035,533
|
|
|
|
263,730,467
|
|
|
|
231,224,512
|
|
*) Representing
amount less than $1 thousand
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS
LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
|
|
Attributable to equity
holders of the Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share
capital
|
|
|
Premium on
shares,
options and
warrants
|
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive
income
|
|
|
Reserve from
transactions
with non-
controlling
interests
|
|
|
Total
equity
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2016
|
|
|
6,606
|
|
|
|
150,748
|
|
|
|
(152,487
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
4,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
Changes in the fair value of available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
Share-based payment to employees and non-employees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
Issuance of shares
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
6,624
|
|
|
|
150,784
|
|
|
|
(154,904
|
)
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
2,687
|
|
|
|
Attributable to equity
holders of the Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share
capital
|
|
|
Premium
on
shares,
options and
warrants
|
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
Treasury
shares
|
|
|
Reserve from
transactions
with non-
controlling
interests
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Non-
controlling
interests
|
|
|
Total
equity
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2015
|
|
|
6,198
|
|
|
|
148,276
|
|
|
|
(148,322
|
)
|
|
|
(1,501
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
4,660
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
4,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,313
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,313
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(4,311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment to employees and non-employees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
Purchase of intangible assets through issuance of
equity
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Issuance of shares and warrants
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
2,983
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,383
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,383
|
|
Transaction with non-controlling interests in InterCure
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Loss of control in InterCure
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(587
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2015
|
|
|
6,606
|
|
|
|
150,748
|
|
|
|
(152,487
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
4,887
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,887
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS
LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
|
|
Attributable to equity holders of
the Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share
capital
|
|
|
Premium
on
shares,
options
and
warrants
|
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
Treasury
shares
|
|
|
Reserve
from
transactions
with non-
controlling
interests
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Non-
controlling
interests
|
|
|
Total
equity
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2014
|
|
|
6,093
|
|
|
|
148,327
|
|
|
|
(146,073
|
)
|
|
|
(2,091
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6,265
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
6,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,527
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,527
|
)
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
(2,865
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment to employees and non-employees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
Issuance of ordinary shares
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
Sale of treasury shares
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
230
|
|
Exercise of options into shares
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2014
|
|
|
6,198
|
|
|
|
148,276
|
|
|
|
(148,322
|
)
|
|
|
(1,501
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
4,660
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
4,679
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS
LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
Year
ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
U.S.
dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
for the year
|
|
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
|
|
(4,311
|
)
|
|
|
(2,865
|
)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile loss to net cash used in operating activities (a)
|
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
2,450
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
(1,732
|
)
|
|
|
(1,861
|
)
|
|
|
(2,470
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deconsolidation of subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from
sale of investment in associate
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
Proceeds from
maturity of restricted deposit
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Investment in
restricted deposit
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from
maturity of short-term bank deposits
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
Purchase of property
and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Purchase
of intangible assets
|
|
10
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from
issuance of shares and warrants
|
|
15
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,559
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Proceeds from
sale of available-for-sale financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
*)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
Sale of subsidiary's shares
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Sale of treasury
shares
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,579
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease)
in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
(1,798
|
)
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
(662
|
)
|
Losses from exchange
rate differences on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
*)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Reclassification
of cash in subsidiary to assets of disposal group held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
3,817
|
|
|
|
2,159
|
|
|
|
2,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
|
|
|
2,019
|
|
|
|
3,817
|
|
|
|
2,159
|
|
|
*)
|
Representing
amount less than $1 thousand
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
XTL
BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile
loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and expenses not involving cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
Loss from disposal of property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
Loss from disposal of intangible assets
|
|
10
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment transactions to employees
and non-employees
|
|
16
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
Revaluation of short-term bank deposits
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
Gains from exchange rate differences on cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
*)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
Disposal of investment in subsidiary
|
|
5
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Change in employee benefit liabilities, net
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
Impairment of intangible assets
|
|
10
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
1,604
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Other financial expenses
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
2,466
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating asset and liability items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in trade receivables
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in other accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
(130)
|
|
|
|
Decrease in inventories
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
Decrease in trade payables
|
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
(210)
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in other
accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
(68)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
(166)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
2,450
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b)
|
|
Additional information
on cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest received
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
Non-cash transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment to
third party
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
De-consolidation of subsidiary:
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Disposal of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Negative premium from disposal of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(587
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Investment in associate at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(482
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Loss from disposal of subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(464
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
*)
|
Representing
amount less than $1 thousand
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS
LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER
31, 2016
|
a.
|
A general description
of the Company and its activity:
|
XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. (the
“Company”) is engaged in the development of therapeutics for the treatment of unmet medical needs. The Company was
incorporated under the Israeli Companies Law on March 9, 1993. The registered office of the Company is located at 5 HaCharoshet
Street, Raanana, Israel.
The Company’s American Depository
Shares (“ADSs”) are listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”) and its ordinary shares
are traded on the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange (“TASE”).
As of December 31, 2016, the Company
has a wholly-owned subsidiary, Xtepo Ltd. (“Xtepo”), which was incorporated in Israel and which holds a license for
the exclusive use of the patent for rHuEPO drug for treating Multiple Myeloma patients.
The Company and Xtepo are heretofore
referred to as the Group.
|
b.
|
The Company has incurred
continuing losses and depends on outside financing resources to continue its activities.
Based on existing business plans, the Company’s management estimates that its outstanding
cash and cash equivalent balances will allow the Company to finance its activities for
an additional period of at least 12 months from the date of this report. However, the
amount of cash which the Company will need in practice to finance its activities depends
on numerous factors which include, but are not limited to, the timing, planning and execution
of clinical trials of existing drugs and future projects which the Company might acquire
or other business development activities such as acquiring new technologies and/or changes
in circumstances which are liable to cause significant expenses to the Company in excess
of management’s current and known expectations as of the date of these Financial
Statements and which will require the Company to reallocate funds against plans, also
due to circumstances beyond its control.
|
The Company expects to incur additional
losses in 2017 arising from research and development activities, testing additional technologies and operating activities, which
will be reflected in negative cash flows from operating activities. In order to perform the clinical trials aimed at developing
a product until obtaining its marketing approval, the Company will need to raise additional funds by issuing securities. Should
the Company fail to raise additional capital at terms acceptable to the Company, it will be required to further reduce its development
activities or sell or grant a sublicense to third parties to use all or part of its technologies.
|
c.
|
On February 17, 2017,
the Company raised gross proceeds amounted to $2,500 thousand from institutional investors
by issuance of 1,000,000 registered ADSs and 1,000,000 warrants to purchase one ADSs
(see also Note 23b).
|
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER
31, 2016
|
NOTE 2:
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
The following is a discussion
of significant accounting policies relating to continuing operations of the Group. For a discussion of significant accounting
policies with regard to discontinued operations, see also Note 5 below.
|
a.
|
Basis of presentation
of the consolidated financial statements:
|
The consolidated financial statements
of the Company (the “Financial Statements”) have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRSs), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
The accounting policies have
been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated and have been prepared under the historical cost
convention, as adjusted for financial assets measured at fair value.
The preparation of Financial
Statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires the Group’s
management to exercise its judgment in the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies. The areas that involve judgment
which have significant effect or complexity or where assumptions and estimates are significant to the Financial Statements are
disclosed in note 3. Actual results could significantly differ from the estimates and assumptions used by the Group’s management.
|
b.
|
Consolidated financial
statements:
|
|
1.
|
Subsidiary consolidation
and business combinations:
|
The consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of the Company and entities controlled by the Company. Control exists when the Company has the power over
the investee; has exposure, or rights, to variable returns from involvement in the investee; and has the ability to use its power
over the investee to affect its returns.
Subsidiary is fully consolidated
starting from the date on which control therein is attained by the Company. The consolidation ceases when such control is discontinued.
Intra-group balances and transactions,
including revenues and expenses in respect of transactions between the Group companies, are eliminated.
|
2.
|
Transactions with non-controlling
interests which do not result in loss of control:
|
Transactions with non-controlling
interests in subsidiary which do not result in loss of control in the subsidiary are accounted for as transactions with owners.
In these transactions, the difference between the fair value of any consideration paid or received and the amount of adjustment
of the non-controlling interests to reflect the changes in their relative rights in the subsidiary is directly recognized in equity
and attributed to the equity holders of the parent.
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER
31, 2016
|
NOTE 2:
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
c.
|
Translation of balances
and transactions in foreign currency:
|
|
1.
|
Functional currency and
presentation currency:
|
Items included in the Financial
Statements of each of the Group’s entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which
the entity operates (the “Functional Currency”). The consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars,
which is the Functional Currency of each of the Group’s entities and the Company’s presentation currency.
Below are the exchange rate
of the U.S. dollar in relation to the NIS:
|
|
Exchange rate
|
|
As of
|
|
of U.S. $ 1
|
|
|
|
NIS
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
3.845
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
3.902
|
|
|
2.
|
Transactions and balances:
|
Transactions in a currency other
than the Functional Currency (“Foreign Currency”) are translated into the Functional Currency using the exchange rates
at the dates of the transactions. After initial recognition, monetary assets and liabilities denominated in Foreign Currency are
translated at the end of each reporting period into the Functional Currency at the exchange rate at that date. Exchange differences
are recognized in the statement of comprehensive loss in the line item finance income (expenses), net. Non-monetary assets and
liabilities denominated in foreign currency and measured at cost are translated at the exchange rate at the date of the transaction.
|
d.
|
Property and equipment:
|
Items of property and equipment
are measured at cost with the addition of direct acquisition costs, less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses.
Depreciation of property and equipment
is calculated on a straight-line basis to reduce their cost to their residual value over their useful life as follows:
|
|
% per-year
|
|
|
|
Computers
|
|
33
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
|
6 - 15 (mainly 6)
|
An asset’s carrying amount
is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset’s carrying amount is greater than its estimated recoverable
amount (see also Note 2f).
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER
31, 2016
|
NOTE 2:
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
1.
|
Unamortized
intangible assets (licenses and patent rights):
|
These assets
are reviewed for impairment once a year and whenever there are indicators of a possible impairment, in accordance with the provisions
of IAS 36,
Impairment of Assets
(see also Note 10). The amortization of an asset on a straight-line basis over its useful
life begins when the development procedure is completed and the asset is available for use.
|
2.
|
Research and development:
|
Research expenditures
are recognized as expenses when incurred. Costs arising from development projects are recognized as intangible assets when the
following criteria are met:
|
-
|
it is technically feasible
to complete the intangible asset so that it will be available for use;
|
|
-
|
management intends to
complete the intangible asset and use or sell it;
|
|
-
|
there is an ability to
use or sell the intangible asset;
|
|
-
|
it can be demonstrated
how the intangible asset will generate probable future economic benefits;
|
|
-
|
adequate technical, financial
and other resources to complete the development and to use or sell the intangible asset
are available; and
|
|
-
|
the expenditure attributable
to the intangible asset during its development can be reliably measured.
|
Other development
expenditures that do not meet these criteria are recognized as an expense when incurred. Development costs that were previously
recognized as an expense are not recognized as an asset in a later period. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Group did not
capitalize development project costs as intangible assets.
|
f.
|
Impairment of non-financial
assets:
|
Intangible assets
which are not yet available for use are not depreciated and impairment in their respect is tested at least every year. Depreciable
assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The
recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use. For the purposes of assessing
impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cash-generating units).
Non-financial assets that sustained impairment are reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment at each date of the statement
of financial position.
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER
31, 2016
|
NOTE 2:
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
The Group classifies its financial
assets into the loans and receivables and available for sale categories. The classification depends on the purpose for which the
financial assets were acquired. The Group’s management determines the classification of its financial assets at initial
recognition.
Loans and receivables:
Loans and receivables are non-derivative
financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They are included in current assets,
except for maturities greater than 12 months after the date of the statement of financial position. The Group’s loans and
receivables are included in the line items: “other accounts receivable”, “cash and cash equivalents”,
and “restricted deposits” in the statement of financial position.
Financial assets available
for sale:
Available-for-sale financial
assets are non-derivatives that are either designated in this category or not classified in any of the other categories. They
are included in non-current assets unless the investment matures or management intends to dispose of it within 12 months of the
end of the reporting period. The financial assets of the Company are marketable securities.
|
2.
|
Recognition and measurement:
|
Regular purchases and sales
of financial assets are recognized in the books of the Group companies on the transaction settlement date which is the date on
which the asset is transferred to the Group or transferred by the Group. Investments are initially recognized at fair value plus
transaction costs and are subsequently carried at fair value through other comprehensive income (loss). Loans and receivables
are subsequently carried at amortized cost using the effective interest method.
|
3.
|
Impairment of financial
assets:
|
Assets classified as available-for-sale
If there is objective evidence
of impairment for available-for-sale financial assets, the cumulative loss is measured as the difference between the acquisition
cost and the current fair value, less any impairment loss on that financial asset previously recognized in profit or loss is removed
from equity and recognized in profit or loss. Impairment losses on equity instruments that were recognized in profit or loss are
not reversed through profit or loss in a subsequent period.
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER
31, 2016
|
NOTE 2:
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
Financial assets carried
at amortized cost:
The Group assesses at the date
of each statement of financial position whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or group of financial assets
is impaired. Impairment losses are incurred only if there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events
that occurred after the initial recognition of the asset (a “loss event”) and that loss event (or events) has an impact
on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or group of financial assets that can be reliably estimated.
The amount of the loss is measured
as the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows (excluding future
credit losses that have not been incurred) discounted at the financial asset’s original effective interest rate. The carrying
amount of the asset is reduced and the amount of the loss is recognized in profit or loss
|
h.
|
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
Cash and cash
equivalents include cash at hand and short-term bank deposits with original maturities of three months or less, that are not restricted
as to withdrawal or use, and are therefore considered to be cash equivalents.
The Company’s
ordinary shares are classified as share capital. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issuance of new shares, options
and warrants are shown in equity as a deduction, from the issuance proceeds.
Trade payables
are the Group’s obligations to pay for goods or services that have been acquired in the ordinary course of business from
suppliers. Trade payables are initially recognized at fair value and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective
interest method.
|
1.
|
Employment benefits for
retirement compensation/pension:
|
The Group
operates various pension plans. The plans are generally funded through payments to insurance companies or trustee-administered
funds. Said pension plans qualify for the criteria of defined contribution plan based on their terms.
|
2.
|
Vacation
and recreation benefits
:
|
According
to the Law, an employee is entitled to paid annual leave and sick leave on an annual basis. The entitlement is based on the number
of years of service. The Company recognizes an obligation and expense for paid annual leave and sick leave based on the benefit
accumulated for each employee.
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER
31, 2016
|
NOTE 2:
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
The Group operates a number of
share-based payment plan to employees, directors, officers and to other service providers who render services that are settled
with the Group’s equity instruments. In this framework, the Company grants employees, from time to time, and, at its discretion,
options to purchase shares of the Company. The fair value of services received from employees in consideration of the grant of
options is measured according to the Black-Scholes model as of the date of grant (the date of the Company's Board of Directors'
decision unless shareholders’ approval is required) and recognized as an expense in the statement of comprehensive loss
and correspondingly carried to equity. The total amount recognized as an expense over the vesting term of the options (the term
over which all pre-established vesting conditions are expected to be satisfied) is determined by reference to the fair value of
the options granted at grant date.
At each reporting date, the Company
revises its estimates of the number of options that are expected to vest based on the non-market vesting conditions and recognizes
the impact of the revision to original estimates, if any, in the statement of comprehensive loss with a corresponding adjustment
in equity.
When options are exercised, the
Company issues new shares. The proceeds net of any directly attributable transaction costs are credited to share capital (nominal
value) and share premium.
Share-based payment transactions
in which the Company acquired assets as consideration for the Company’s equity instruments are measured at the value of
the intangible assets acquired.
Operating leases in which a significant
portion of the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor are classified as operating leases. Payments made under
operating leases are charged to the statement of comprehensive loss on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.
Basic loss per share is calculated
by dividing the loss attributable to equity holders of the Company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding
during the period, less treasury shares.
In calculating diluted loss per
share, in addition to the average of ordinary shares (net of treasury shares) used for calculating basic loss per share, the weighted
average number of shares that will be issued assuming that all the potentially dilutive shares are converted into shares is also
taken into consideration. Potential shares are taken into account as above only when their effect is dilutive by increasing the
loss per share. For each of the three years ended December 31, 2016, the effect of potential shares was anti-dilutive, and therefore
were not taken into consideration when calculating loss per share.
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER
31, 2016
|
NOTE 2:
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
|
o.
|
New and amended IFRS
standards:
|
Certain new accounting standards
and interpretations have been published that are not mandatory for December 31, 2016 reporting periods and have not been early
adopted by the Company:
International Financial Reporting
Standard No. 9 “Financial Instruments” )“IFRS 9”)
IFRS 9 addresses the classification,
measurement and recognition of financial assets and financial liabilities. The complete version of IFRS 9 was issued in July 2014.
It replaces the guidance in IAS 39 that relates to the classification and measurement of financial instruments. IFRS 9 retains
but simplifies the mixed measurement model and establishes three primary measurement categories for financial assets: amortized
cost, fair value through other comprehensive income and fair value through profit or loss. The basis of classification depends
on the entity’s business model and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial asset. Investments in equity
instruments are required to be measured at fair value through profit or loss with the irrevocable option at inception to present
changes in fair value in other comprehensive income. Further, the expected credit losses model replaces the incurred loss impairment
model used in IAS 39. For financial liabilities, there were no changes to classification and measurement except for the recognition
of changes in the Company’s own credit risk in other comprehensive income for liabilities designated at fair value through
profit or loss.
The new impairment model requires
the recognition of impairment provisions based on expected credit losses (ECL) rather than only incurred credit losses as is the
case under IAS 39. It applies to financial assets classified at amortized cost, debt instruments measured at FVOCI, contract assets
under IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers, lease receivables, loan commitments and certain financial guarantee
contracts. While the group has not yet undertaken a detailed assessment of how its impairment provisions would be affected by
the new model, it may result in an earlier recognition of credit losses
The standard is effective for accounting
periods beginning on or after 1 January, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of IFRS
9. International Financial Reporting Standard No. 16 “Leases” (“IFRS 16”)
IFRS 16 defines a lease as a contract,
or part of a contract, that conveys the right to use an asset (the underlying asset) for a period of time in exchange for consideration.
Under IFRS 16, lessees have to recognize a lease liability reflecting future lease payments and a ‘right-of-use asset’
for almost all lease contracts.
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER
31, 2016
|
NOTE 2:
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
|
The standard replaces the current
guidance in IAS 17. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019. The Company is currently
assessing the impact of adopting IFRS 16.
|
NOTE 3:
|
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS
|
Estimates and judgments are continually
evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed
to be reasonable under the circumstances.
|
a.
|
Critical accounting estimates and assumptions:
|
Accounting estimates will, by definition,
seldom equal the related actual results. The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment
to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are addressed below.
|
(i)
|
In
testing impairment of
unamortized intangible assets (licenses and patent rights)
,
the Company’s management is required to estimate, among other things, the probable
endpoints of trials conducted by the Company, the commercial technical feasibility of
the development and the resulting economic benefits. Actual results and estimates to
be made in the future may significantly differ from current estimates.
|
|
(ii)
|
The Group is required
to determine at the end of each reporting period whether there is any indication that
an asset may be impaired. If indicators for impairment are identified, the Group estimates
the assets’ recoverable amount, which is the higher of an asset’s fair value
less costs to sell and its value-in-use.
|
See note 10 below for further information regarding
impairment of intangible assets.
|
2.
|
Share-based payments -
in evaluating the fair value of share-based payment, the Company’s management is
required to estimate, among others, different parameters included in the computation
of the fair value of the options and the number of options that will vest.
|
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER
31, 2016
|
NOTE 4:
|
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS AND FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
|
|
a.
|
Financial risk management:
|
|
1.
|
Financial risk factors:
|
The Group’s activities
expose it to a variety of financial risks: market risks, currency risk and liquidity risk. The Group’s overall risk management
program focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimize potential adverse effects on the Group’s
financial performance.
Risk management is carried out
by the Group’s management under policies approved by the Board. The Group’s treasury identifies, evaluates and defines
financial risks. The Board provides written principles for overall risk management, as well as written policies covering specific
areas, such as foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk and investment of excess liquidity.
Foreign currency exchange rate risk:
The Group operates internationally
and is exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from various currency exposures with respect to the NIS. Foreign exchange risk
arises from assets and liabilities denominated in currency that is other than the functional currency.
The Company treasury’s
risk management policy is to hold NIS-denominated cash and cash equivalents in the amount of the anticipated NIS-denominated liabilities
for six to twelve consecutive months from time to time and this in line with the directives of the Company’s Board.
As of December 31, 2016, had
the Group’s functional currency weakened by 10% against the NIS with all other variables remaining constant, post-tax loss
for the year would have been $22 thousand lower (2015 - loss approximately $20 thousand lower; 2014 - loss approximately $85 thousand
lower), mainly as a result of exchange rate changes on translation of other accounts receivable and exchange rate changes on NIS-denominated
cash and cash equivalents.
Cash flow forecasting is performed
by the Group’s management both in the entities of the Group and aggregated by the Group. The Group’s management monitors
rolling forecasts of the Group’s liquidity requirements to ensure it has sufficient cash to meet operations. The Group does
not use borrowing credit facilities.
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER
31, 2016
|
NOTE 4:
|
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS AND FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (Cont.)
|
Surplus cash held to finance
operating activities is invested in interest bearing current accounts and time deposits. These channels were chosen by reference
to their appropriate maturities or liquidity to provide sufficient cash balances to the Group as determined by the abovementioned
forecasts.
As of December 31, 2016
and 2015, the maturity of the Group’s financial liabilities is less than one year from each of the reporting dates.
The Group’s objectives
when managing capital are to ensure the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to provide returns on investments
for shareholders and benefits for other interested parties and to maintain an optimal capital structure to reduce the cost of
capital.
In order to maintain or adjust
the capital structure, the Group may take a variety of measures such as issue new shares or sell assets to reduce liabilities.
|
b.
|
Financial instruments by category:
|
As of December 31, 2016
and 2015, all financial assets were classified in one of two categories: (a) loans and receivables, measured at amortized cost,
and (b) marketable securities measured at fair value. All financial liabilities as of such dates were classified in the category
of other financial liabilities at amortized cost.
|
NOTE 5:
|
INTERCURE
- DISCONTINUED OPERATION
|
On June 13,
2012, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire the control over InterCure Ltd. (“InterCure”) for a consideration
of approximately $2.7 million.
On July 25,
2012, the transaction was completed after all the prerequisites had been met and the Company acquired 16,839,532 ordinary shares
of InterCure with no par value, in consideration of a private placement of 7,165,662 ordinary shares of the Company of NIS 0.1
par value each, whose value on the date of signing the agreement, measured according to the quoted market price of the Company’s
shares on the TASE, was approximately $2.2 million, and which represents a value of InterCure of $1.75 million before the money,
but after all of InterCure’s debts were converted as described above (“InterCure’s Adjusted Value”). The
fair value of the Company’s shares on the date of consummation of the transaction was approximately $2.5 million. In
the year ended December 31, 2013, InterCure sold 1,097,719 shares of the Company for an aggregate amount of approximately $283
thousand. In addition, the Company provided InterCure an amount of approximately $150 thousand in cash on the basis of InterCure’s
Adjusted Value. After affecting the above allocation, the Company held approximately 50.79% of the issued and outstanding share
capital of InterCure. The investment of Medica Fund on the date of closing on the basis of InterCure’s Adjusted Value amounted
to approximately $460 thousand.
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER
31, 2016
|
NOTE 5:
|
INTERCURE
- DISCONTINUED OPERATION (Cont.)
|
On May 16, 2013,
the Company informed InterCure of its decision to convert its entire convertible loan which had been extended by the Company in
the context of the acquisition into 7,620,695 ordinary shares of InterCure, as predetermined in the original acquisition agreement.
Upon conversion, the Company held approximately 54.72% of InterCure’s issued and outstanding share capital.
In November 2014,
InterCure announced that its Audit Committee and Board of Directors approved the signing of an agreement with Green Forest Global
Ltd. (the “Agreement” and “Green Forest”, respectively) a company wholly owned by Mr. Alexander Rabinovitch,
an interested party in the Company.
Pursuant to the
Agreement, following a reverse split in InterCure shares at a 10:1 ratio, Green Forest was allotted 2,622,647 ordinary shares
of InterCure (the “First Round Allotted Shares”) representing 34.23% of the issued and outstanding shares of InterCure
at the time of the allotment for an investment of $230 thousand. Further, upon InterCure’s shares return to the main list
of the TASE, an additional 2,622,648 ordinary shares of InterCure were allotted to Green Forest for an additional investment of
$230 thousand (the “Second Round Allotted Shares”).
In addition,
the Agreement granted Green Forest the following three options:
|
1.
|
Option
to purchase up to an additional 3,416,818 ordinary shares of InterCure for $300 thousand
(representing an exercise price of $0.0878 per share), exercisable within 12 months of
the Transaction Completion Date, as defined in the Agreement.
|
|
2.
|
Option
to acquire the Company shares held by InterCure at a price of NIS 0.35 per share, exercisable
within 6 months of the Transaction Completion Date.
|
|
3.
|
Option
to acquire InterCure’s assets, rights and obligations relating to the “Resperate”
business at the cost of inventory held at the time of the exercise of the option, exercisable
within 6 months of the Transaction Completion Date.
|
Under the Agreement,
Green Forest provided InterCure with a qualifying, non-secured, non-guaranteed, non-interest bearing and non-indexed loan of $40
thousand for a period of 60 days. At the time of the completion of the transaction, the loan was repaid by the sale of shares
of the Company held by InterCure to Green Forest for the value of the loan ($40 thousand) at a price of NIS 0.30 per share.
InterCure was
granted the right to a Put option to sell all or part of the Company’s shares held by InterCure at the Put option exercise
date, for an exercise price of NIS 0.30 per share, exercisable within 6 months of the Transaction Completion Date.
In addition,
at the time of and as a condition for the completion of the transaction, the outstanding loan of $50 thousand owed by InterCure
to the Company was be converted to 569,470 ordinary shares of InterCure.
On December 23,
2014, the extraordinary general meeting of InterCure approved the Agreement. Upon receiving the required approval to the Agreement
from TASE, the Agreement turned effective as of February 12, 2015.
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER
31, 2016
|
NOTE 5:
|
INTERCURE
- DISCONTINUED OPERATION (Cont.)
|
On February 1,
2015, in accordance with a request made by the Israeli Securities Authority to increase public holdings in InterCure prior to
the execution of the Agreement, the Company sold 2,166,667 shares of InterCure to a non-related third party, for an amount of
approximately $17 thousand. As a result, the Company’s holding in InterCure’s issued and outstanding share capital
decreased to approximately 49.87%. The sale of InterCure shares was considered as a transaction with non-controlling interests
without loss of control.
After the issuance
of the 2,622,647 First Round Allotted Shares, as well as the conversion of the loan granted to InterCure into 569,470 ordinary
shares of InterCure, the Company’s holdings in InterCure were diluted to 36.53% of the issued and outstanding share capital
of InterCure. The Company’s management then determined that implementation of the Agreement constituted a loss of control
in InterCure as of the same date.
On March 23,
2015, InterCure issued 37,804,012 ordinary shares as part of a rights offering, thus diluting the Company’s holding in InterCure’s
issued and outstanding share capital to approximately 6.16%.
On March 31,
2015, the Company and Green Forest mutually agreed to terminate the voting agreement signed by the parties on February 12, 2015.
Following said termination, the directors appointed by the Company resigned from the board of directors of InterCure.
On April 2, 2015,
InterCure issued the Second Round Allotted Shares, thus diluting the Company’s holding in InterCure’s issued and outstanding
share capital to approximately 5.82%.
As a result of
the accounting treatment of the deconsolidation of InterCure, the Company recorded a loss from discontinued operations of $689
thousand. In addition, the Company recorded its remaining investment in InterCure shares at a fair value of $482 thousand, as
quoted on the TASE as of the loss of control date. Following the aforementioned rights offering, the Company recorded a loss from
the change in fair value of InterCure shares in the amount of $225 thousand.
As for intangible
assets recognized for the first time after the completion of the InterCure transaction, as presented above, and due to a significant
decline in InterCure’s share price as quoted on the TASE as of December 31, 2013, the Company hired the services of an external
independent expert in order to establish whether or not an impairment exists in connection with the technology and brand name
assets recognized in the purchase price allocation study of InterCure.
The recoverable
amount was assessed by management with the assistance of a consultant. In light of recent developments in InterCure, namely conclusions
reached by its management and board of directors regarding its ability to continue operating as a going concern, several scenarios
were taken into account by the expert. Each scenario was assigned a different weight in order to accommodate all scenarios into
a weighted-average discounted cash flow. Such scenarios were as follows:
|
(i)
|
The
liquidation scenario, under which the realizable value of InterCure’s net operational
assets was estimated, was assigned a weighting of 60%.
|
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER
31, 2016
|
NOTE 5:
|
INTERCURE
- DISCONTINUED OPERATION (Cont.)
|
|
(ii)
|
The
going concern scenario, establishing the value-in-use of InterCure’s operations
using the discounted cash flow method, was assigned a weighting of 40%. The value-in-use
calculations use pre-tax cash flow projections covering an eight-year period and using
extrapolation with specific adjustments expected until 2021, and a pre-tax discount rate
of 33.3%. The value-in-use calculations included all factors in nominal terms.
|
The impairment
test was based on assessments of financial performance and future strategies in light of current and expected market and economic
conditions. Trends in the economic and financial environment, competition and regulatory authorities’ decisions, or changes
in competitors’ behavior in response to the economic environment may affect the estimate of recoverable amounts in future
periods.
For the purpose
of the impairment test, InterCure was considered the lowest level for which there are separately identifiable cash flows - a Cash
Generating Unit (“CGU”). Upon examination, the expert concluded that an impairment exists, and that InterCure’s
recoverable amount stands at $ 300 thousand. The impairment loss in the amount of $1.8 million was recognized in loss from operations,
and allocated between said intangible assets of the CGU pro rata, based on their respective carrying amounts (net of amortization),
in the following amounts:
Technology -
$1.4 million;
Brand Name -
$357 thousand.
Since termination
of the voting agreement between the Company and Green Forest on March 31, 2015, the Company’s investment in InterCure is
classified as marketable securities.
|
a.
|
Analysis of the results
of discontinued operations is as follows:
|
|
|
Period from
January 1 to
February
12,
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(2,197
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gain (loss)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(746
|
)
|
|
b.
|
Analysis of cash flow of
discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2014, is as follows:
|
|
|
Period from
January 1 to
February
12,
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flows
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(487
|
)
|
Investing cash flows
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
Financing cash flows
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash flows
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER
31, 2016
|
NOTE 6:
|
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash in banks and on hand
|
|
|
2,019
|
|
|
|
3,347
|
|
Bank deposits with original maturities of three months or less
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,019
|
|
|
|
3,817
|
|
The currencies in which the cash and cash equivalents
are denominated or linked to are:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars
|
|
|
1,908
|
|
|
|
3,683
|
|
NIS (not linked to the Israeli CPI)
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Other currencies
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,019
|
|
|
|
3,817
|
|
|
NOTE 7:
|
MARKETABLE
SECURITIES
|
|
a.
|
All
marketable securities held by the Company constitute Level 1 financial instruments, as
defined in IFRS 13 - “
Fair Value Measurement
”.
Level 1 inputs
are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
that the entity can access at the measurement date.
|
|
b.
|
The Company holds the following financial instruments:
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets available for sale
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
c.
|
Changes in marketable
securities for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, were as follows:
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value opening balance
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
Changes in fair value during the period
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER
31, 2016
|
NOTE 8:
|
OTHER
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
|
Composition:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government authorities (*)
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Other
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
(*)
|
The government authorities and others are monetary
items which are denominated or linked is NIS.
|
The carrying amount of other
accounts receivable is a reasonable approximation of the fair value because the effect of discounting is immaterial.
|
NOTE 9:
|
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION ABOUT INVESTMENT IN INVESTEES
|
Name and country of
incorporation of
subsidiary
|
|
Date
|
|
Equity
interests
and
voting rights
|
|
|
Scope
of
investments
in
investee
(in $ 000)
|
|
|
Stock Exchange data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Xtepo, incorporated in Israel
|
|
31.12.2016
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
2,668
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
31.12.2015
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
2,668
|
|
|
-
|
2
|
|
InterCure, incorporated in
Israel
|
|
31.12.2016
|
|
|
3.78
|
%
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
TASE, value of shares as of 31.12.16 - $414
|
|
|
|
|
31.12.2015
|
|
|
5.82
|
%
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
TASE, value of shares as of 31.12.15 - $251 thousand
|
|
NOTE 10:
|
INTANGIBLE
ASSETS
|
|
a.
|
On August 3, 2010, the
Company completed the share swap transaction with the shareholders of Bio-Gal Ltd. (the
“Transaction”) in which the Company acquired 100% of the shares of Xtepo,
which for the Transaction purposes held an exclusive license to use the patented recombinant
EPO (rHuEPO) drug for treating Multiple Myeloma and also held cash totaling approximately
$1.5 million on the date of completion of the transaction, in return for the allocation
of 133,063,688 ordinary shares of NIS 0.1 par value each, representing approximately
69.44% of the Company’s issued and outstanding share capital after completion of
the Transaction.
|
Following the closing of the Transaction,
the Company recognized in its accounts an intangible asset representing the license for the exclusive use of the patent for the
rHuEPO drug for Multiple Myeloma as well as every clinical study and accumulated knowhow underlying the patent in a total of approximately
$2,265 thousand (excluding transaction costs of approximately $187 thousand), based on its fair value as of the date of closing
of the Transaction according to an independent external valuation.
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER
31, 2016
|
NOTE 10:
|
INTANGIBLE
ASSETS (Cont.)
|
On May 29, 2011, the Company received
the approval of the FDA, a subdivision of the U.S. Health and Human Services, for orphan drug status for the rHuEPO drug which
is patented by the Company until 2019.
According to the guidance of IAS
38, this asset is not ready for usage according to the Company's management intention and therefore has not amortized yet and
the Company reviews the asset for impairment once a year or more frequently if indicators show that the asset may be impaired.
In December 2015, the Company tested
the asset for impairment in accordance with the guidance of IAS 36. According to the valuation performed, as of December 31, 2015,
the book value amounted to $2,452 thousand of the rHuEPO intangible asset exceeded its recoverable amount by $1,604 thousand.
Therefore, a loss from impairment should be recorded regarding the asset. The recoverable amount was determined as fair value
less costs of disposal, which was determined on the basis of the discounted future cash flow method for the years 2016 to 2029
less costs of disposal. The discount period was determined on the basis of the estimated timelines to perform the clinical trials
in order to approve the drug for marketing and under the limitation of the patent years and the orphan drug designation as above.
The key assumptions used in measuring
the recoverable amount related to the rHuEPO intangible asset as of December 31, 2015 include: duration of phase 2 and 3 clinical
trials of 2.5 and 3.5 years, respectively, expected penetration levels from 10% in 2023 to 55% in 2027-2029 out of an estimate
of 67,566 new cases of Multiple Myeloma diagnosed each year, royalties at the rate of 12.5% and (post-tax) discount rate of 24%.
In March 2017, the Company’s
Board of Directors decided on the abandonment of the EPO development and therefore the carrying amount of the rHuEPO intangible
asset of $848 has been reduced to zero as of December 31, 2016 in a separate line in the statement of comprehensive loss.
|
b.
|
On
January 7, 2014, the Company signed a licensing agreement with Yeda to develop hCDR1,
a Phase II-ready asset for the treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (“SLE”).
The terms of the licensing agreement include, among other things, expense reimbursement
for patent expenses payable in six installments, certain milestone payments to Yeda,
low single-digit royalties based on net sales, and additional customary royalties to
the Office of the Chief Scientist.
|
On May 14, 2014, the Company issued
222,605 ordinary shares of the Company of NIS 0.1 par value each to Yeda, as the first of six installments for the aforementioned
patent expenses reimbursement, representing a value of approximately $38 thousand.
On January 21, 2015, the Company
issued Yeda 802,912 ordinary shares of the Company of NIS 0.1 par value each, as the second of six installments for the aforementioned
patent expenses reimbursement, representing a value of approximately $84 thousand.
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016
|
NOTE 10:
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Cont.)
|
On August 3, 2015, the Company
paid Yeda an amount of approximately $64 thousand, as the third of six installments for the aforementioned patent expenses reimbursement.
On February 1, 2016, the
Company paid Yeda an amount of approximately $64 thousand, as the fourth of six installments for the aforementioned patent expenses
reimbursement.
In July 2016, the Company
and Yeda signed a second amendment to the license agreement whereby, the final two payments due under the Agreement will be made
on April 7, 2017, provided that if the Company receives funding of at least $5,000 thousand then the Company shall be required
to promptly pay Yeda any unpaid patent expense reimbursement in one lump-sum cash payment.
In order to measure the
fair value of the hCDR1 asset, Company management deducted the fair value of its other assets and liabilities from the amount
representing its market value as of December 31, 2016. The resulting fair value attributable to the hCDR1 asset was higher than
the book value of the hCDR1 asset and therefore no impairment was recorded in the Company's financial statements as of December
31, 2016.
|
c.
|
Composition
and movement:
|
The composition of intangible
assets, net, by major classes, and the movement therein in the three years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, are:
|
|
rHuEPO
|
|
|
hCDR1
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2016
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions during the year
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Impairment of intangible assets
|
|
|
(848
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
rHuEPO
|
|
|
hCDR1
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2015
|
|
|
2,452
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions during the year
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
Impairment of intangible assets
|
|
|
(1,604
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,604
|
)
|
Disposal
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016
|
NOTE 10:
|
INTANGIBLE
ASSETS (Cont.)
|
|
|
rHuEPO
|
|
|
hCDR1
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2014
|
|
|
2,452
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions during the year
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost at December 31, 2014
|
|
|
2,452
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open accounts
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Checks payable
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
The carrying amount of trade
payables is a reasonable approximation of their fair value because the effect of discounting is immaterial.
|
b.
|
The
carrying amount of trade payables is denominated in the following currencies:
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
NIS (not linked to the Israeli CPI)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
NOTE 12:
|
OTHER
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees, consultants and payroll accruals
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016
|
NOTE 12:
|
OTHER
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE (Cont.)
|
The carrying amount of other
accounts payable is a reasonable approximation of their fair value because the effect of discounting is immaterial.
|
b.
|
The
carrying amount of other accounts payable is denominated in the following currencies:
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
NIS (not linked to the Israeli CPI)
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
Other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
NOTE 13:
|
EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT LIABILITIES
|
According
to the effective labor laws and employment agreements in Israel, the Company is obligated to pay compensation and/or pension to
employees who are dismissed and, under certain circumstances, to employees who retire.
The Company’s
obligation for pension payment in Israel and the Company’s obligation for compensation payments to employees in Israel for
whom the applicable obligation is pursuant to section 14 to the Severance Pay Law, are covered by fixed contributions into defined
contribution plans. The amounts contributed as above are not reflected in the statements of financial position. Section 14 to
the Severance Pay Law applies to all of the Company’s employees.
The amounts
recognized as expenses for defined contribution plans for employees of the Company in 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $17, $16 and $25
thousand, respectively.
|
a.
|
Royalty
and contingent milestone payments:
|
On August 3, 2010,
the Company entered into Asset Purchase Agreement ("APA") to acquire from Bio-Gal the rights to develop rHuEPO for the
treatment of multiple myeloma under the research and license agreement with Yeda (see also Note 10b). According to the APA, the
Company is obligated to pay 1% royalties on net sales of the developed product as well as a fixed royalty payment in the amount
of $350 thousand upon the successful completion of a phase 2 clinical trial. The payment conditions for the above amount are at
the earlier of occurrence of the following events:
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016
|
NOTE 14:
|
COMMITMENTS
(Cont.)
|
|
(i)
|
Raising capital of
at least $2 million by the Company or Xtepo after a successful completion of a phase
2 clinical trial;
|
|
(ii)
|
Six
months after the successful completion of a phase 2 clinical trial.
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2016, the Company
has not completed the phase 2 clinical trial and therefore no royalty expenses have been
recorded.
|
|
b.
|
Operating
lease commitments:
|
The Company entered into
an operating lease agreement on the offices it uses, which is in effect until April 2017 with an option upon the Company's discretion
for extension of additional two years. The lease fees are stated in NIS and are not linked to the Israeli CPI. To secure the lease,
the Company provided a bank guarantee, which is secured by a restricted NIS deposit of approximately $10 thousand.The expected
lease fees and management fees for subsequent years under the prevailing lease fees as of December 31, 2016 are as follows:
|
|
U.S.
dollars
in
thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
10
|
|
The Company entered into
an agreement with subtenants to lease part of the office space in exchange for approximately $1.2 thousand per month. The sublease
agreement is in effect until April 2017.
|
NOTE 15:
|
SHARE
CAPITAL, RESERVES AND RETAINED EARNINGS
|
|
a.
|
The
Company’s Ordinary shares of NIS 0.1 are traded on the TASE. The Company’s
ADSs are listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market in the U.S. The share price
was NIS 0.116 as of December 31, 2016.
|
|
b.
|
Ordinary
shares confer upon their holders voting rights and right to participate in the shareholders’
meeting, right to receive dividends and the right to participate in the excess of assets
upon liquidation of the Company.
|
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016
|
NOTE 15:
|
SHARE
CAPITAL, RESERVES AND RETAINED EARNINGS (Cont.)
|
|
c.
|
On June 1, 2012, the Company
applied for the relisting of its ADSs on the Nasdaq (after the ADSs had been delisted from trade on the Nasdaq in July 2009),
subject to compliance with all the criteria reviewed by the Nasdaq admissions committee, including minimum ADS price (according
to the various listing criteria). On September 24, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a change in the number
of shares underlying the ADSs such that 20 ordinary shares of the Company will constitute a single ADS, this in order to support
the Company’s compliance with the Nasdaq’s ADS listing conditions. The record date of change in the ADS ratio
is October 4, 2012. On July 10, 2013, the Company’s management received a notice from Nasdaq representatives stating
that the admission committee had approved the Company’s application to relist its ADSs for trading on the Nasdaq Capital
Market. Accordingly, on July 15, 2013, the Company’s ADSs began trading on Nasdaq.
|
Effective February 10, 2017,
the number of shares underlying the ADSs was changed such that 100 ordinary shares of the Company will constitute a single ADS
(see also Note 23a).
In April 2015, the Company
raised gross funds amounted to $4.0 million by means of issuing a total of 355,556 ADSs to several investors. In addition, under
the share purchase agreements, the investors received unregistered warrants to purchase 177,778 ADSs (excluding warrant to purchase
up to 17,978 ADSs that has been issued to placement agent). The warrants may be exercised from the six-month anniversary of the
issuance date and for five years thereafter and have an exercise price of $11.25 per ADS, subject to standard adjustments as set
forth therein.
|
d.
|
In
February 2016 and May 2016, the Company issued total of 680,000 ordinary shares, represented
by 6,800 ADSs, to a service provider, as part of the terms of a investor relationship
service agreement signed in January 2016. Consequently, the Company recorded expenses
amounted to $54 thousand, which representing the fair value of the ordinary shares in
January 2016.
|
|
NOTE 16:
|
SHARE-BASED
PAYMENT
|
On August 29, 2011, the Company’s
Board of Directors approved the adoption of an employee share option plan for the grant of options exercisable into shares of
the Company in accordance with section 102 to the Israeli Tax Ordinance (the “2011 Plan”) which ended after 10 years,
and the holding of up to 10,000,000 shares in the framework of the 2011 Plan, for option allocation to Company employees, directors
and consultants. The terms of the options which will be granted according to the 2011 Plan, including the option period, exercise
price, vesting period and exercise period shall be determined by the Company’s Board of Directors on the date of the actual
allocation. As of December 31, 2016, the remaining number of options available for grant under the 2011 Plan is 3,180,000
options.
Movements
in the number of share options and their related weighted average exercise prices (in dollars) during the years ended December
31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016
|
NOTE 16:
|
SHARE-BASED
PAYMENT (Cont.)
|
|
|
Year ended December
31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
Number of
options
|
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
(USD)
|
|
|
Number of
options
|
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
|
|
|
Number of
options
|
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
4,870,000
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
6,683,862
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
8,038,000
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2,950,000
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
3,030,000
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,160,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(1,070,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
(2,513,862
|
)
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,224,138
|
)
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
6,750,000
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
4,870,000
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
6,683,862
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of year
|
|
|
3,833,333
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
2,939,168
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
4,275,525
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
Below is
information about the exercise price (in dollars) and the remaining contractual life (in years) for options outstanding at end
of year:
December 31,
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Options
outstanding
at
end of year
|
|
|
Range
of
exercise prices
(NIS)
|
|
|
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
life
|
|
|
Options
outstanding
at end of
year
|
|
|
Range of
exercise
prices (NIS)
|
|
|
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,450,000
|
|
|
|
0
- 0.5
|
|
|
|
8.13
|
|
|
|
4,810,000
|
|
|
|
0
- 0.5
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
5,300,000
|
|
|
|
0.5
-1.6
|
|
|
|
7.93
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
1.5
– 1.6
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,750,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,870,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net expenses
recognized in the Company’s statements of comprehensive loss for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 for grant
of options to employees were $182 (($54 thousand out of which related to certain service provider as detailed in Note 15d) , $148
and $278 thousand, respectively.
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER
31, 2016
|
NOTE 16:
|
SHARE-BASED
PAYMENT (Cont.)
|
The table below summarizes
the outstanding options as of December 31, 2016 that have been granted to the Company’s executives, directors and consultants
-
Options
outstanding
|
|
|
Position
|
|
Grant
date (*)
|
|
Exercise
price
in
NIS
|
|
|
Fair
value
USD
|
|
|
Vesting schedule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
Legal counsel
|
|
January 15, 2008
|
|
|
1.575
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
25% on grant date and 25% on each year over a period of 3 years from the grant
date
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
Bookkeeper
|
|
April 12, 2012
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
12 equal portions each quarter over a period of 3 years from the grant date
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
October 15, 2013
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
12 equal portions each quarter over a period of 3 years from the grant date
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
October 15, 2013
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
12 equal portions each quarter over a period of 3 years from the grant date
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
December 30, 2013
|
|
|
0.5328
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
12 equal portions each quarter over a period of 3 years from the grant date
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
Consultant
|
|
February 26, 2014
|
|
|
0.644
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
12 equal portions each month over a period of one year from the grant date
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
Four Directors
|
|
December 30, 2014
|
|
|
0.4325
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
33.33% of the stock options vest following the lapse of 12 months from the grant date, and
the remaining 66.67% vest in 8 equal portions each quarter over a period of 2 years from the first
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
Consultant
|
|
December 30, 2014
|
|
|
0.4915
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
33.33% of the stock options vest following the lapse of 12 months from the grant date, and
the remaining 66.67% vest in 8 equal portions each quarter over a period of 2 years from the first
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
Two Directors
|
|
March 25, 2015
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
33.33% of the stock options vest following the lapse of 12 months from the grant date, and
the remaining 66.67% vest in 8 equal portions each quarter over a period of 2 years from the first
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
March 25, 2015
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
33.33% of the stock options vest following the lapse of 12 months from the grant date, and
the remaining 66.67% vest in 8 equal portions each quarter over a period of 2 years from the first
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
Chief Executive Office
|
|
March 25, 2015
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
33.33% of the stock options vest following the lapse of 12 months from the grant date, and
the remaining 66.67% vest in 8 equal portions each quarter over a period of 2 years from the first
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
June 1, 2015
|
|
|
0.4283
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
12 equal portions each quarter over a period of 3 years from the grant date
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
Medical Director
|
|
March 4, 2016
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
12 equal portions each quarter over a period of 3 years from the date of grant
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
Chairman of Board
|
|
March 31, 2016
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
12 equal portions each quarter over a period of 3 years from the date of grant
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
March 31, 2016
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
33.33% of the stock options vest following the lapse of 12 months from the grant date, and
the remaining 66.67% vest in 8 equal portions each quarter over a period of 2 years from the first anniversary
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
May 31, 2016
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
33.33% of the stock options vest following the lapse of 12 months from
the grant date, and the remaining 66.67% vest in 8 equal portions each quarter over a period of 2 years from the first
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,750,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
Date
of the Company's Board of Directors’ decision (or shareholders, if required).
|
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016
|
NOTE 16:
|
SHARE-BASED
PAYMENT (Cont.)
|
The fair value for options
granted in 2016 and 2015 is estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes-Merton Options pricing model with the following
weighted average assumptions:
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
74.4%
|
|
|
|
75.56%
|
|
Risk-free interest
|
|
|
1.97%
|
|
|
|
1.39%-2.68%
|
|
Expected life (years)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
We have calculated the volatility
based on the company's historical volatility and comparable companies' historical volatility. The share price was set according
to the Company's share market value as of grant date.
|
NOTE 17:
|
RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES
|
|
|
Year ended December
31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees related to service providers
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Expenses relating to options to employees and non-employees
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Professional consulting
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
Lab materials
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
Other
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
NOTE 18:
|
GENERAL
AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
|
|
|
Year ended December
31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and expenses relating to employees
and service providers
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
Expenses relating to options and shares to employees
and non-employees
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
Patents and fees
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
Directors’ fees
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Investor relations and travel
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
Rent and office maintenance
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
Vehicle maintenance
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
Depreciation and loss from disposal
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Other
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
1,744
|
|
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER
31, 2016
|
NOTE 19:
|
FINANCE
INCOME (EXPENSES), NET
|
|
|
Year ended December
31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
Finance expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Bank account management fees and commissions
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other financial expenses
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total finance expenses
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on bank deposits
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Exchange differences
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total finance income
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance income (expenses),
net
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
a.
|
Tax rates applicable to the Company:
|
|
1.
|
Taxable income of the
Company is subject to a corporate tax rate as follow: 2015 - 26.5% and 2016 - 25%.
|
|
2.
|
On January 5, 2016, the
Israeli Parliament officially published the Law for the Amendment of the Israeli Tax
Ordinance (Amendment 216), that reduces the standard corporate income tax rate from 26.5%
to 25%.
|
|
3.
|
In December 2016, the
Israeli Parliament approved the Economic Efficiency Law (Legislative Amendments for Applying
the Economic Policy for the 2017 and 2018 Budget Years), 2016 which reduces the corporate
income tax rate to 24% (instead of 25%) effective from January 1, 2017 and to 23% effective
from January 1, 2018.
|
|
c.
|
The
Group’s carryforward tax losses as of December 31, 2016, totaled approximately
$30 million which may be carried forward and offset against taxable income in the future
for an indefinite period. The Company did not recognize deferred taxes for carryforward
losses and temporary differences, as well as capital losses and real losses, because
their utilization in the foreseeable future is not probable.
|
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016
|
NOTE 20:
|
TAXES
ON INCOME (Cont.)
|
|
d.
|
Below
is the reconciliation between the “theoretical” tax expense, assuming that
all the income were taxed at the regular tax rate applicable to companies in Israel and
the taxes recorded in the statements of comprehensive income in the reporting year:
|
|
|
Year ended December
31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before taxes
on income, as reported in the statements of comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
|
|
(4,311
|
)
|
|
|
(2,865
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theoretical tax saving on this loss
|
|
|
(636
|
)
|
|
|
(1,142
|
)
|
|
|
(759
|
)
|
Decrease in taxes resulting from different tax rates
for foreign subsidiaries
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Expenses not deductible for tax purposes
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Effect of lower tax rates on capital gains
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Increase in taxes resulting
mainly from taxable losses in the reported year for which no deferred taxes were recognized
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
1,102
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
The Company filed self-assessments
that are deemed final through the 2012 tax year. Xtepo has not received tax assessments since its incorporation in November 2009.
|
NOTE 21:
|
TRANSACTIONS
AND BALANCES WITH RELATED PARTIES
|
“Related party” - as the term is defined
in IAS 24,
“Related Party Disclosures”
(“IAS 24”).
The Company’s key management
personnel who are included, along with other factors, in the definition of related party, as above in IAS 24, includes directors
and members of the executive committee.
Compensation to key management
personnel:
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER
31, 2016
|
NOTE 21:
|
TRANSACTIONS
AND BALANCES WITH RELATED PARTIES (Cont.)
|
The compensation to key management
personnel for employee services provided to the Company is shown below:
|
|
Year ended December
31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, management and consulting
fees and other short-term benefits
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
Share-based payments, net
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of persons
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
As of December 31, 2016 and
2015, the Company’s balances with related parties total approximately $61 thousand ($46 thousand out of which were linked
to the NIS) and $58 thousand (of which $37 thousand were linked to the NIS), respectively.
For further information regarding
share-based payment to related parties, see also Note 16 above.
|
NOTE 22:
|
SEGMENT
INFORMATION
|
The Group’s management
establishes operating segments in accordance with reports reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”)
and which are used to make strategic decisions. Given the deconsolidation of InterCure and the classification of related results
to discontinued operations, the Company operates in one operating segment.
|
NOTE 23:
|
EVENTS
AFTER THE REPORTING DATE
|
|
a.
|
On January 17, 2017, the
Company's Board of Directors approved the change which was effective as of February 10,
2017 in the number of shares underlying the ADSs such that 100 ordinary shares of the
Company will constitute a single ADS, this in order to support the Company’s compliance
with the Nasdaq’s ADS listing conditions.
|
All ADS data was adjusted
to reflect the current ADS to ordinary share ratio, meaning 1:100.
|
b.
|
On
February 17, 2017, the Company entered into Securities Purchase Agreement ("SPA")
with Institutional Investors ("Investors") for the sale of 1,000,000 registered
ADSs for gross proceeds of $2,500 thousand, representing a purchase price of $2.50 per
ADS in a registered direct offering ("Offering"). Additionally, for each ADS
purchased by Investors, the Investors received an unregistered warrant to purchase one
ADS ("Warrant"). The Warrant has an exercise price of $4.10 per ADS, shall
be exercisable six months following the issuance date and will expire five and one-half
years from the issuance date. The closing of the offering took place on February 23,
2017.
|
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016
|
NOTE 23:
|
EVENTS
AFTER THE REPORTING DATE (Cont.)
|
In addition, the Company
entered into engagement agreement ("Agreement") with an exclusive placement agent ("Agent") pursuant to which
at the closing of each Offering, the Company will compensate the Agent for its service under the Agreement as follows:
|
§
|
Cash
fee equal to 7% of the aggregate gross proceeds raised in each Offering, except that
in relation to any proceeds raised from certain existing shareholders of the Company
participating in an Offering and listed in the Agreement ("Existing Shareholders"),
the Company shall pay to the Agent a cash fee equal to 3.5% of the aggregate gross proceeds
raised from such Existing Shareholders in each such Offering. In addition, the Company
shall pay the Agent a cash management fee equal to 1% of the aggregate gross proceeds
raised in each Offering.
|
|
§
|
Warrants
to purchase ADSs equal to 5% of the aggregate number of warrants to purchase ADSs placed
in each Offering. The Warrant shall have the same terms as the warrants, if any, issued
to investors in the applicable Offering. If no warrants are issued to investors in an
Offering, the Warrant shall have a term of five years and an exercise price equal to
120% of the then market price of the ADSs.
|
|
§
|
Expense
allowance equal to (i) $35 thousand for accountable fees and expenses of HCW (other than
legal) as defined in the Agreement and (ii) the greater of $75 thousand and 1% of the
gross proceeds raised in such Offering for legal counsel fees and expenses.
|
The direct and incremental
costs (in addition to the aforesaid Agent's compensation) related to the aforementioned Offering under SPA amounted to approximately
$423 thousand.
|
c.
|
On March 6, 2017, the Company
entered into private placement transaction with existing investors pursuant to which
1,400,000 ADSs have been issued at a purchase price of $2.00 per ADS for total gross
consideration of $2,800 thousand. The direct and incremental costs related to the aforesaid
transaction amounted to $67 thousand. For each ADS purchased by investors, the investors
will receive an unregistered warrant to purchase one ADS subject to authorized capital
increase through the Company's shareholders meeting. The warrants have a term of five
and a half years, an exercise price of $2.30 per ADS and shall be exercisable on the
later of the effectiveness of the authorized share increase or six months following the
issuance date. The closing of the offering has taken place on March 22, 2017.
|
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2017
UNAUDITED
INDEX
- - - - - - - - - - - -
XTL
BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Unaudited
|
|
|
Audited
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
6,085
|
|
|
|
2,322
|
|
|
|
2,019
|
|
Restricted deposit
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
Other accounts receivable
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,444
|
|
|
|
2,934
|
|
|
|
2,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted deposit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
1,122
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
6,825
|
|
|
|
4,056
|
|
|
|
3,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Other accounts payable
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WARRANTS AT FAIR VALUE
|
|
|
2,919
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY ATTRIBUTABLE TO EQUITY HOLDERS OF THE COMPANY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital - ordinary shares of NIS 0.1 par
value: authorized - September 30, 2017 (unaudited) and December 31, 2016 - 1,450,000,000 and 700,000,000 shares, respectively;
issued and outstanding: September 30, 2017 (unaudited) and December 31, 2016 - 514,205,799 and 274,205,799 shares, respectively
|
|
|
13,182
|
|
|
|
6,624
|
|
|
|
6,624
|
|
Premium on shares, options and warrants
|
|
|
146,003
|
|
|
|
150,784
|
|
|
|
150,784
|
|
Reserve from transactions with non-controlling
interests
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(155,651
|
)
|
|
|
(153,721
|
)
|
|
|
(154,904
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
3,620
|
|
|
|
3,825
|
|
|
|
2,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
6,825
|
|
|
|
4,056
|
|
|
|
3,017
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of the interim consolidated financial statements
|
|
|
|
|
Shlomo Shalev
|
|
Josh Levine
|
|
Itay Weinstein
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Approval date of the interim consolidated
financial statements by the Company's Board: November XX, 2017.
XTL
BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
|
|
Nine
months ended
September
30,
|
|
|
Three
months ended
September
30,
|
|
|
Year
ended
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
(except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(913
|
)
|
|
|
(978
|
)
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
(265
|
)
|
|
|
(1,270
|
)
|
Impairment of intangible assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(960
|
)
|
|
|
(1,368
|
)
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
(2,561
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance cost related to warrants to investors
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Revaluation of warrants to purchase ADS's
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,780
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other finance income
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Other finance expenses
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance income, net
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
1,776
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total profit (loss) for the
period
|
|
|
(779
|
)
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
|
|
(286
|
)
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the fair value of available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
Realized gain from sale available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
(loss)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
for the period
|
|
|
(876
|
)
|
|
|
(1,222
|
)
|
|
|
1,527
|
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
|
|
(2,382
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings
(loss) per share (in U.S. dollars):
|
|
|
(0.002
|
)
|
|
|
(0.005
|
)
|
|
|
0.003
|
|
|
|
(0.001
|
)
|
|
|
(0.009
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of
Ordinary Shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share
|
|
|
455,300,468
|
|
|
|
273,977,887
|
|
|
|
514,205,799
|
|
|
|
274,205,799
|
|
|
|
274,035,533
|
|
|
*)
|
Representing
an amount less than $1 thousand
|
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of the interim consolidated financial statements
XTL
BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
Share
capital
|
|
|
Premium
on
shares,
options
and
warrants
|
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
Reserve
from
transactions
with non-
controlling
interests
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive
income
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2017
|
|
|
6,624
|
|
|
|
150,784
|
|
|
|
(154,904
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
2,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss for the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(779
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(779
|
)
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(779
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(876
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Issuance of Ordinary Shares,
net of issuance costs ($ 175 thousands)
|
|
|
6,558
|
|
|
|
(4,781
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30,
2017 (unaudited)
|
|
|
13,182
|
|
|
|
146,003
|
|
|
|
(155,651
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
3,620
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30, 2016
|
|
|
|
Share
capital
|
|
|
Premium
on
shares,
options
and
warrants
|
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
Reserve
from
transactions
with non-
controlling
interests
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive
income
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2016
|
|
|
6,606
|
|
|
|
150,748
|
|
|
|
(152,487
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss for the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
(1,222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Issuance of Ordinary Shares
to third party
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30,
2016 (unaudited)
|
|
|
6,624
|
|
|
|
150,784
|
|
|
|
(153,721
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
3,825
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of the interim consolidated financial statements
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
|
|
Three months ended
September 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
Share
capital
|
|
|
Premium
on
shares,
options
and
warrants
|
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
Reserve
from
transactions
with non-
controlling
interests
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive
income
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 1, 2017
|
|
|
13,182
|
|
|
|
146,003
|
|
|
|
(157,240
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
2,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
1,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30,
2017 (unaudited)
|
|
|
13,182
|
|
|
|
146,003
|
|
|
|
(155,651
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
3,620
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
September 30, 2016
|
|
|
|
Share
capital
|
|
|
Premium
on
shares,
options
and
warrants
|
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
Reserve
from
transactions
with non-
controlling
interests
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive
income
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 1, 2016
|
|
|
6,624
|
|
|
|
150,784
|
|
|
|
(153,460
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
4,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss for the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(286
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(286
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(286
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30,
2016 (unaudited)
|
|
|
6,624
|
|
|
|
150,784
|
|
|
|
(153,721
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
3,825
|
|
|
|
Year ended December
31, 2016
|
|
|
|
Share
capital
|
|
|
Premium
on
shares,
options
and
warrants
|
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
Reserve
from
transactions
with non-
controlling
interests
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive
income
|
|
|
Total
equity
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2016
|
|
|
6,606
|
|
|
|
150,748
|
|
|
|
(152,487
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss for the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
Issuance of shares
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31,
2016
|
|
|
6,624
|
|
|
|
150,784
|
|
|
|
(154,904
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
2,687
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of the interim consolidated financial statements
XTL
BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
Nine
months ended
September
30,
|
|
|
Three
months ended
September
30,
|
|
|
Year
ended
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit (loss) for the period
|
|
|
(779
|
)
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
|
|
(286
|
)
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile loss
to net cash used in operating activities (a)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(1,826
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
|
(824
|
)
|
|
|
(1,432
|
)
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
(283
|
)
|
|
|
(1,732
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Selling of property and equipment
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Purchase of intangible assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used
in) investing activities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of units comprised from Ordinary
Shares and warrants, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
4,881
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
4,881
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,058
|
|
|
|
(1,498
|
)
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
|
|
(1,798
|
)
|
Gains from exchange rate differences on cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
*)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
the beginning of the period
|
|
|
2,019
|
|
|
|
3,817
|
|
|
|
6,325
|
|
|
|
2,605
|
|
|
|
3,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
at the end of the period
|
|
|
6,085
|
|
|
|
2,322
|
|
|
|
6,085
|
|
|
|
2,322
|
|
|
|
2,019
|
|
|
*)
|
Representing
amount less than $1 thousand
|
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of the interim consolidated financial statements
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
Nine
months ended
September
30,
|
|
|
Three
months ended
September
30,
|
|
|
Year
ended
December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars in thousands
|
|
(a)
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and expenses not involving cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
Loss from disposal of property and equipment
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
Gains from exchange rate differences on restricted
deposit
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Gains from exchange rate differences on cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
*)
|
|
|
Impairment of intangible assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Ordinary Shares to third party
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Issuance cost related to warrants to investors
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Revaluation of warrants to
purchase ADS's
|
|
|
(513
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,780
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
(1,778
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating asset and liability items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in other accounts receivable
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in trade payables
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
Decrease in other accounts
payable
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(1,826
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
Non-cash activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Ordinary Shares
to third party
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchasing of intangible
assets versus other accounts payable
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*)
|
Representing
amount less than $1 thousand
|
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of the interim consolidated financial statements
XTL
BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES
TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT
SEPTEMBER
30, 2017 (UNAUDITED)
|
a.
|
A general description
of the Company and its activity:
|
XTL Biopharmaceuticals
Ltd. (the "Company") is engaged in the development of therapeutics for the treatment of unmet medical needs. The Company
was incorporated under the Israeli Companies Law on March 9, 1993. The registered office of the Company is located at 5 Badner
Street, Ramat Gan, Israel.
The Company’s American
Depository Shares ("ADS's") are listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market ("Nasdaq") and its ordinary
shares are traded on the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange ("TASE").
As of September 30, 2017,
the Company has a wholly-owned subsidiary, Xtepo Ltd. ("Xtepo"), which was incorporated in Israel and which holds a
license for the exclusive use of the patent for rHuEPO drug for treating Multiple Myeloma patients.
In March 2017, the Company’s
Board of Directors decided on the abandonment of the EPO development and therefore the rHuEPO intangible asset was reduced to
zero as of December 31, 2016.
|
b.
|
The Company has incurred
continuing losses and depends on outside financing resources to continue its activities.
Based on existing business plans, the Company’s management estimates that its outstanding
cash and cash equivalent balances will allow the Company to finance its activities for
an additional period of at least 12 months from the date of this report. However, the
amount of cash which the Company will need in practice to finance its activities depends
on numerous factors which include, but are not limited to, the timing, planning and execution
of clinical trials of existing drugs and future projects which the Company might acquire
or other business development activities such as acquiring new technologies and/or changes
in circumstances which are liable to cause significant expenses to the Company in excess
of management’s current and known expectations as of the date of these financial
statements and which will require the Company to reallocate funds against plans, also
due to circumstances beyond its control.
|
The Company expects to
incur additional losses in 2017 arising from research and development activities, testing additional technologies and operating
activities, which will be reflected in negative cash flows from operating activities. In order to perform the clinical trials
aimed at developing a product until obtaining its marketing approval, the Company will be required to raise additional funds in
the future by issuing securities. Should the Company fail to raise additional capital in the future under standard terms, it will
be required to minimize its activities or sell or grant a sublicense to third parties to use all or part of its technologies.
|
c.
|
On April 4, 2017, Mr.
David Kestenbaum announced his desire to cease his services as the Company’s Chief
Financial Officer. Based on agreement with the Company it was agreed that notice period
will be ended on July 4, 2017 (the "Termination Date"). Among the others, it
was decided that the options of Mr. David Kestenbaum will be extended for another year
following Termination Date. Such extension will be accounted as modification under IFRS
2 "Share-based Payment" ("IFRS 2") (see also Note 5d1).
|
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES
TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT
SEPTEMBER
30, 2017 (UNAUDITED)
|
d.
|
On August 3, 2017,
the Company held its Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, pursuant to which, inter
alia, it was decided to increase the Company’s authorized share capital from 700,000,000
Ordinary Shares to 1,450,000,000 Ordinary Shares (see also Note 5b) and approving the
terms of the new Employment Agreement with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer
("CEO") which includes among the others reduction in his capacity to 50% commencing
June 11, 2017, one-time bonus upon achieving milestones, grant of 1,000,000 options to
purchase 1,000,000 Ordinary Shares of the Company at an exercise price of NIS 0.11 (see
also Note 5d2) and acceleration of vesting period of the aforementioned granted options
upon specific milestone achievement regarding the lupus property and/or HCDR1 product
and.
|
|
NOTE 2:
|
BASIS
OF PREPARATION OF THE UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
a.
|
The condensed unaudited
consolidated financial information of the Company as of September 30, 2017 and 2016,
and for the respective interim periods of nine and three months then ended ("interim
financial information") has been prepared in accordance with IAS 34, "Interim
Financial Reporting" ("IAS 34"). This interim financial information does
not contain all the information and disclosures that are required in the framework of
the annual financial statements. This interim financial information should be read in
conjunction with the annual financial statements for 2016 and the accompanying notes
which have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards
("IFRS") as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
|
|
b.
|
Estimates and Judgments
- the preparation of the interim consolidated financial statements requires the Company's
management to make judgments and to use accounting estimates and assumptions that have
an effect on the application of the Company's accounting policies and on the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
|
The Company's significant
accounting policies and methods of computation adopted in the preparation of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements
are consistent with those followed in the preparation of the annual consolidated financial statements for the year ended on December
31, 2016.
In addition, during 2017
the Company issued warrants (see also note 4 and 5 to the condensed financial statements), and therefore used assumptions for
calculation of their fair value. In accordance with International Accounting Standard 32: "Financial Instruments: Presentation",
warrants allotted to investors with a cashless exercise mechanism are a "financial liability". As the aforementioned
liability is a non-equity derivative financial instrument, it is classified in accordance with International Accounting Standard
32 "Financial Instruments: Presentation " as a financial liability at fair value through profit or loss, which is measured
at its fair value at each date of the balance sheet, with changes in the fair value carried to "revaluation of warrants to
purchase ADS's" in the statements of comprehensive loss.
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES
TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT
SEPTEMBER
30, 2017 (UNAUDITED)
|
NOTE 3:
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
The Company's significant
accounting policies and methods of computation adopted in the preparation of the interim consolidated financial statements are
consistent with those followed in the preparation of the annual consolidated financial statements for 2016.
Warrants
issued during the year ended on December 31, 2017:
The
issuance gross proceeds were allocated to the issuance components as follows:
Since the warrants were
classified as financial liabilities, the Company has initially recognized them, based on IAS 39, at fair value as of the date
of issuance (measured through third-party appraiser, using a Black and Scholes model);
The amount recognized in
shareholders equity, which represents the funds attributed to the ordinary shares issued, was calculated as the difference between
the total issuance proceeds and the fair value of the warrants at that date.
Incremental and direct issuance
costs allocated by the Company based on the relative value of the warrants (as calculated on the date of issuance) and the Ordinary
Shares (calculated as the difference between the proceeds and the fair value of the warrants). The portion of issuance costs that
was allocated to the warrants is recognized immediately as finance expenses in the statement of comprehensive loss and the portion
of issuance costs related to the Ordinary Shares is deducted from additional-paid in capital.
New standards not yet adopted
by the Company:
IFRS 9 addresses the classification,
measurement and derecognition of financial assets and financial liabilities, introduces new rules for hedge accounting and a new
impairment model for financial assets.
The Company has reviewed
its financial assets and liabilities and is not expecting material impact on its financial statements except of the following:
The Company's marketable
securities, which are currently equity instruments classified as Available-For-Sale financial assets, will be measured at fair
value through profit or loss under IFRS 9. Therefore, the accumulated appreciation of such marketable securities, which is
currently included in accumulated other comprehensive income, will be reclassified to the opening balance of retained earnings
as of January 1, 2018.
IFRS 16 defines a lease
as a contract, or part of a contract, that conveys the right to use an asset (the underlying asset) for a period of time in exchange
for consideration. Under IFRS 16, lessees have to recognize a lease liability reflecting future lease payments and a ‘right-of-use
asset’ for almost all lease contracts.
As of the date of approval
of these condensed financial statements, since the Company doesn't have lease contracts in material amounts, it does not expect
that the adoption of IFRS 16 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
|
NOTE 4:-
|
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
|
During the three months
period ended March 31, 2017, the Company raised gross funds amounted to $5,300 thousand by issuance 2,400,000 ADS's and 2,400,000
warrants to purchase the same amount of ADS's. The warrant shall be exercisable six months following the issuance date and will
expire five and one-half years from the issuance date. The numbers of warrant and its exercise price may be adjusted upon standard
anti-dilution protections clauses and subject to cashless exercise mechanism (see also Note 5c).
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES
TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT
SEPTEMBER
30, 2017 (UNAUDITED)
|
NOTE 4:-
|
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT (Cont.)
|
IFRS 13 "
Fair Value
Measurement
", ("IFRS 13"), defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the
fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal
or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market
participants would use when
pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions and risk of nonperformance.
IFRS 13 also establishes
a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs
when measuring fair value. A financial instrument's categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level
of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. IFRS 13 establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure
fair value.
|
Level 1 -
|
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
|
|
Level 2 -
|
inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted
prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in
markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially
the full term of the assets or liabilities; or
|
|
Level 3 -
|
unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant
to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
|
The Company accounted for
the warrants issued to investors with a cashless exercise mechanism as a non-current liability according to provisions of IAS
32. Based on IAS 39, the Company measured the warrants at fair value by using a Black and Scholes model. Such warrants will be
measured in each reporting period until they are exercised or expired, with changes in the fair value being recognized in the
Company`s statement of comprehensive income/loss as financial income or expense, as appropriate. The warrants are classified as
level 3.
The
Company used the following assumptions to estimate the Investors' warrants:
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
March 7,
|
|
|
February 17,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate (1)
|
|
|
1.92
|
%
|
|
|
2.11
|
%
|
|
|
2.05
|
%
|
Expected volatility (2)
|
|
|
64.2
|
%
|
|
|
70.26
|
%
|
|
|
70.22
|
%
|
Expected life (in years) (3)
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
Dividend yield (4)
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Risk-free interest
rate - based on yield rates of non-index linked U.S. Federal Reserve treasury bonds.
|
|
(2)
|
Expected
volatility - was calculated based on actual historical share price movements of the Company
over a term that is equivalent to the expected term of the option. If the change in standard
deviation for these warrants shifted +/- 5%, the impact on profit or loss for the
|
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES
TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT
SEPTEMBER
30, 2017 (UNAUDITED)
|
NOTE 4:-
|
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT (Cont.)
|
Nine
months ended September 30, 2017, would be $206,003 and $(213,407) , respectively. The higher the standard deviation, the higher
the fair value.
|
(3)
|
Expected life - the
expected life was based on the expiration date of the warrants.
|
|
(4)
|
Dividend yield - was
based on the fact that the Company has not paid dividends to its shareholders in the
past and does not expect to pay dividends to its shareholders in the future.
|
The changes
in Level 3 liabilities associated with the warrants that were issued to investors are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
The following tabular presentation reflects the components of the liability associated with such warrants as of September 30,
2017 (unaudited):
|
|
Fair value
of liability
related to
warrants
|
|
|
|
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2017
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of warrants granted to
U.S.
institutional and
existing
investors
|
|
|
3,432
|
|
Revaluation of warrants to
purchase ADS's
|
|
|
(513
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30,
2017 (unaudited)
|
|
$
|
2,919
|
|
As of
September 30, 2017, none of the aforesaid warrants has been exercised.
In addition, the Company’s
financial instruments also include cash and cash equivalents, other accounts receivable, trade payables and other accounts payables.
As of September 30, 2017, the fair value of these financial instruments was not materially different from their carrying values
due to the short-term maturities of such instruments.
All marketable securities
held by the Company constitute Level 1 financial instruments.
|
NOTE 5:
|
SIGNIFICANT
EVENTS DURING THE PERIOD
|
|
a.
|
On January 17, 2017,
the Company's Board of Directors approved the change, effective as of February 10, 2017,
in the number of shares underlying the ADS's such that 100 ordinary shares of the Company
constitute a single ADS, this in order to support the Company’s compliance with
the Nasdaq’s ADS listing conditions.
|
All ADS's data was adjusted
to reflect the current ADS's to ordinary share ratio.
|
b.
|
As discussed in Note
1d, On August 3, 2017, the Company’s Annual General Meeting of Shareholders decided
to increase the Company’s authorized share capital by NIS 75,000,000, such that
following the increase, the authorized share capital shall equal NIS 145,000,000 divided
into 1,450,000,000 ordinary shares, par value NIS 0.1 each.
|
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES
TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT
SEPTEMBER
30, 2017 (UNAUDITED)
|
NOTE 5:
|
SIGNIFICANT
EVENTS DURING THE PERIOD (Cont.)
|
|
1.
|
On February 17, 2017,
the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement ("SPA") with Institutional
Investors ("Investors") for the sale of 1,000,000 registered ADS's for gross
proceeds of $2,500 thousand, representing a purchase price of $2.50 per ADS in a registered
direct offering ("Offering"). Additionally, for each ADS purchased by Investors,
the Investors received an unregistered warrant to purchase one ADS ("Warrant").
The Warrant has an exercise price of $4.10 per ADS, shall be exercisable six months following
the issuance date and will expire five and one-half years from the issuance date. The
closing of the Offering took place on February 23, 2017.
|
In addition, the Company
entered into engagement agreement ("Agreement") with an exclusive Placement Agent ("Agent") pursuant to which
at the closing of each Offering, the Company will compensate the Agent for its service under the Agreement as follows:
Cash fee equal to 7% of
the aggregate gross proceeds raised in each Offering, except that in relation to any proceeds raised from certain existing shareholders
of the Company participating in an Offering and listed in the Agreement ("Existing Shareholders"), the Company shall
pay to the Agent a cash fee equal to 3.5% of the aggregate gross proceeds raised from such Existing Shareholders in each such
Offering. In addition, the Company shall pay the Agent a cash management fee equal to 1% of the aggregate gross proceeds raised
in each Offering.
|
§
|
Warrants
to purchase ADS's equal to 5% of the aggregate number of warrants to purchase ADS's placed
in each Offering. The Warrant shall have the same terms as the warrants, if any, issued
to investors in the applicable Offering. If no warrants are issued to investors in an
Offering, the Warrant shall have a term of five years and an exercise price equal to
120% of the then market price of the ADS's. The fair value of such warrants amounted
to $84 thousand at the issuance date.
|
|
§
|
Expense
allowance equal to $35 thousand for accountable fees and expenses of HCW (other than
legal) as defined in the Agreement.
|
The direct and incremental
costs related to the aforementioned Offering under SPA amounted to approximately $439 thousand ($84 thousand related to warrants
granted to Agent's).
|
2.
|
On March
7
,
2017, the Company entered into private placement transaction with existing investors
pursuant to which 1,400,000 ADS's have been issued at a purchase price of $2.00 per ADS
for total gross consideration of $2,800 thousand. The direct and incremental costs related
to the aforesaid transaction amounted to $82 thousand ($18 thousand out of which has
not been paid as of September 30, 2017). For each
|
XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
NOTES
TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT
SEPTEMBER
30, 2017 (UNAUDITED)
|
NOTE 5:
|
SIGNIFICANT
EVENTS DURING THE PERIOD (Cont.)
|
ADS's purchased by investors,
the investors will receive an unregistered warrant to purchase one ADS subject to authorized capital increase through the Company's
shareholders meeting. The warrants have a term of five and a half years, an exercise price of $2.30 per ADS and shall be exercisable
on the later of the effectiveness of the authorized share increase or six months following the issuance date. The closing of the
offering took place on March 22, 2017.
The exercise price of the
aforementioned warrants is adjusted upon standard anti-dilution protections clauses but the number of warrants is subject to cashless
exercise mechanism pursuant to which the fixed to fixed test is not met and therefore the warrants are accounted for as a non-current
liability (see also Note 4).
The Company allocated the
issuance costs based on the relative value of the warrants (as calculated on the date of issuance) and the Ordinary Shares (calculated
as the difference between the proceeds and the fair value of the warrants). The portion of issuance costs that related to the
warrants is recognized immediately as finance expenses in the statement of comprehensive loss and the portion of issuance costs
related to the Ordinary
Shares is deducted from
additional-paid in capital.
Total amount of $346 thousand
($298 thousand related to the investment during February 2017 and $48 thousands related to the investment during March 2017) was
recognized as finance expenses which is reflecting the portion of issuance costs that were allocated the issued warrants.
Amount of $175 thousand
was deducted from additional-paid in capital as it was allocated to the Ordinary Shares.
|
d.
|
Stock-based compensation
|
As discussed in Note 1d,
on August 3, 2017, the Company’s annual general meeting of the shareholders approved the allocation of 1,000,000 stock options
to the Company’s CEO, exercisable into 1,000,000 ordinary shares of NIS 0.1 par value each of the Company, for an exercise
price of NIS 0.11 per stock option. The fair value of all the stock options according to the Black-Scholes model pursuant to IFRS
2 as of the date of grant (the date of the annual general meeting) was approximately $28 thousand. The exercise period of the
stock options is a maximum of ten years from the grant date. The options shall vest on a quarterly basis over 36 months, such
that 1/3 of the options shall vest 12 months from June 11, 2017 and thereafter 1/12 of the options shall vest on the last day
of each three months, provided that on such date the CEO is still employed by the Company. All vested options shall remain exercisable
for a period of 12 months from the end or termination of the Agreement. The value of each stock option is based on the following
assumptions: expected dividend rate of 0%, expected standard deviation of 76.75%, risk-free interest rates of 1.87% and expected
life until exercise of 10 years.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
3,850,000 American Depositary Shares
Each American Depositary Share Represents
100 Ordinary Shares
PROSPECTUS
The date of this prospectus is March 6,
2018.
Grafico Azioni XTL Biopharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:XTLB)
Storico
Da Ott 2024 a Nov 2024
Grafico Azioni XTL Biopharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:XTLB)
Storico
Da Nov 2023 a Nov 2024