UPDATE: House Proposal Seen Cementing Futures Market Rules
23 Giugno 2010 - 10:40PM
Dow Jones News
U.S. lawmakers Wednesday floated an amendment to sweeping new
financial regulations that would cement the near-monopoly held by
futures exchanges over many product lines.
The amendment to commodities market law, offered by the House,
would prevent any clearinghouse from having to take on the credit
risk of another clearinghouse.
While the final language remains subject to change, its
insertion would maintain the barrier to so-called
"inter-operability" between clearinghouses set up to handle futures
trades.
Futures markets are often viewed as natural monopolies because
trading tends to flow to the largest pool of business because
traders can secure the best price, even if trading costs on a rival
platform are lower.
The inability to switch positions between clearinghouses has
helped create a near-duopoly in futures trading by CME Group Inc.
(CME) and IntercontinentalExchange Inc. (ICE), despite some overlap
and the expansion plans of NYSE Euronext (NYX) and new entrants
such as ELX Futures LP.
"This limit will tend to concentrate business at the biggest
exchanges/clearing houses," said analysts at Concept Capital in
Washington.
The amendment is backed by CME and ICE, and comes as lawmakers
near completion in crafting broad new rules for U.S. financial
markets, after the credit crunch of 2008 exposed numerous risks to
the system.
Debate on the House offer is set to commence Thursday. Once the
final changes have been made, it will be sent to the Senate, which
must accept, reject or counter the offer.
Clearinghouses serve as central counterparties to trading
activity, standing between transactions to reduce the risk to the
market if a member of the clearinghouse defaults.
In U.S. securities and options markets, trades go through one
clearinghouse set up for each asset class. But in futures markets,
exchanges can own their own clearinghouses, which handle specific
contracts traded on each market.
Under this structure, traders who want to trade on CME's
interest-rate futures markets must clear their transactions at the
exchange's own clearinghouse, whereas investors seeking to buy or
sell shares in General Electric Co. (GE), for example, could trade
the stock on any platform.
Competing futures exchanges have launched copycat versions of
CME's products, but the critical mass of trading activity held by
CME has made it tough for rivals to gain much traction.
Futures exchange operators such as CME and ICE have warned that
tearing down the walls between their clearinghouses could increase
systemic risk. They have cautioned that as more and more
clearinghouses are set up to handle derivatives, standards
governing risk and collateral could fall as the units compete for
business.
Making one clearinghouse take on positions held at another venue
could introduce risk that the first clearinghouse isn't comfortable
holding.
"We support lawmakers' efforts to reduce systemic risk in the
financial markets, and as markets become increasingly
interconnected, central counterparties have to carefully manage
risk and not be forced to assume counterparty credit risk of other
clearinghouses," said a CME spokesman.
Neal Wolkoff, chief executive of upstart exchange operator ELX
Futures LP, told lawmakers in a letter that the "vague" amendment
would make it harder for other markets to compete against CME,
which is "seeking to protect the status quo."
The proposal could prove problematic for ELX, which is locked in
a dispute with CME over a rule that would let customers arrange to
move futures positions between the two exchanges' clearinghouses.
ELX is pushing for the rule, while CME has vowed to block such
transactions. Regulators have yet to decide the matter.
In addition to the amendment on inter-operability, CME scored a
separate victory in a proposal that would exclude futures from
"open access," wherein traders of over-the-counter derivatives are
allowed to decide where their transactions are cleared.
Commodity Futures Trading Commission Chairman Gary Gensler has
supported open access for swap products as a way to promote
competition among clearing venues. Separating out futures from the
provision protects CME's home turf by ensuring that trades on CME's
markets cannot be cleared elsewhere.
-By Jacob Bunge and Sarah N. Lynch, Dow Jones Newswires; (312)
750 4117; jacob.bunge@dowjones.com
Grafico Azioni NYSE Group (NYSE:NYX)
Storico
Da Giu 2024 a Lug 2024
Grafico Azioni NYSE Group (NYSE:NYX)
Storico
Da Lug 2023 a Lug 2024