Court's approval of merger clears way for bid for Fox assets;
deal frenzy is possible
By Shalini Ramachandran
This article is being republished as part of our daily
reproduction of WSJ.com articles that also appeared in the U.S.
print edition of The Wall Street Journal (June 13, 2018).
A court's approval of AT&T Inc.'s merger with Time Warner
Inc. paves a clear path for Comcast Corp. to bid for 21st Century
Fox assets as early as Wednesday and could trigger a round of
deal-making by smaller media companies trying to keep up with the
industry's titans.
The AT&T deal, which survived the U.S. Justice Department's
legal challenge, will create a juggernaut with an unprecedented mix
of assets spanning TV distribution, cable programming, wireless and
broadband.
Separately, Walt Disney Co. and cable giant Comcast appear
headed for a bidding war over Fox assets, including its Hollywood
studio and international properties.
For Comcast, approval of the AT&T deal bolsters its case
with Fox that a tie-up between the companies can pass muster with
regulators. Comcast is expected to submit an all-cash bid at a
substantial premium to Disney's all-stock $52.4 billion offer,
people close to the situation say.
The AT&T-Time Warner and Fox deals are the sort that media
executives hope could give them the best shot to compete in a world
where the superpowers of tech, from Netflix Inc. to Facebook Inc.,
have disrupted the old ways of doing business and consumers are
turning away from the cable TV bundle.
As the giants get even bigger, there could be a reckoning for
smaller U.S. media concerns including CBS Corp., Viacom Inc.,
Discovery Inc., AMC Networks Inc. and Lions Gate Entertainment
Corp. The combined market values of all those companies is around
$58 billion, compared with $150 billion for Comcast and around $285
billion for a combined AT&T-Time Warner.
Media stocks rose in after-hours trading following the decision,
as investors anticipate heightened deal activity. Lions Gate and
Fox shares rose around 7%, while Disney shares fell more than 1%
and Comcast shares declined more than 3% with a bidding war looming
ahead over Fox. Netflix shares fell about 1% after the ruling.
The second-tier of companies will be under pressure to find
deals of their own that don't just increase their exposure to
traditional TV, but give them the scale and mix of assets to
withstand the industry's changes, investment bankers and industry
analysts say.
"The floodgates will open," said Jessica Reif, a veteran media
and cable analyst at Bank of America Merrill Lynch.
The twin pillars of traditional TV -- revenue from cable TV
subscriptions and advertising -- are under attack. Netflix has
pioneered a model selling television directly to consumers, not
through the cable bundle. And its willingness to pay staggering
premiums for programming and tie-ups with star producers such as
Shonda Rhimes is driving up the market for talent.
Alphabet Inc.'s Google and Facebook, meanwhile, have
revolutionized advertising, channeling large amounts of data on
users to target ads at specific groups of people in a way that TV
can't match.
"The combination of new technologies and new entrants...has
changed the competitive dynamic in a dramatic way," said Jonathan
Levitsky, a mergers and acquisitions lawyer at Debevoise &
Plimpton who has played a role in several big media deals in recent
years. "This cozy ecosystem is under attack, and those changes are
what's driving people's desire to do deals."
Across the media industry, moguls are calculating whether now is
the time to exit. 21st Century Fox Executive Chairman Rupert
Murdoch's decision to sell the Fox assets he had assembled over
decades was a powerful signal to many observers that something
fundamentally had changed.
"Some of the most iconic media executives are transitioning
right now and that's a very big deal," said Jennifer Nason, global
chairman of Investment Banking at J.P. Morgan.
Until relatively recently, mergers between midsize TV network
owners seemed like a logical response to upheaval in media. The
idea was that bigger programmers could ensure widespread carriage
in cable TV packages and extract the highest fees.
But those tie-ups may not be enough in a post-cable-bundle world
where companies will need greater scale and resources for
programming; the technological know-how to create streaming
products for a direct relationships with consumers; and data to
appeal to advertisers, analysts say.
Cable tycoon John Malone, who owns stakes in Discovery, Lions
Gate and Charter Communications Inc., has been advocating for a
roll-up of content companies for years. Discovery's merger this
year with HGTV-parent Scripps Networks Interactive was one move in
that direction, and Discovery also sought unsuccessfully to acquire
beleaguered Spanish-language broadcaster Univision Communications
Inc., another likely target.
Shari Redstone, whose National Amusements Inc. controls CBS and
Viacom, has pushed for a merger of those companies. But she is
engaged in a legal power struggle with CBS and many of its
directors, who oppose the deal and are trying to strip her of
voting control.
Even if the merger happened, it would be unlikely to result in a
combined company with enough scale to compete, Bank of America's
Ms. Reif said. Ms. Redstone's endgame may be to sell the merged
company to a bigger player like Verizon Communications Inc., court
documents and people familiar with her thinking have said.
Time Warner, which owns premier cable brands like HBO and CNN as
well as the Warner Bros. studio, fits into AT&T's plans to go
after cable TV cord-cutters and build a robust advertising-sales
business. The telecom giant has promised a $15-a-month bundle of
channels without sports. And it is banking on data from its
wireless arm to help target TV ads at consumers in more
sophisticated ways.
Companies are also eager for international growth with the U.S.
pay-TV business in the early stages of a secular decline. In the
case of the battle for Fox's entertainment assets, both Disney and
Comcast are eager to acquire Fox's European, Latin American and
Indian businesses -- more so than even some domestic assets in the
mix like regional sports networks that were once considered
valuable.
Which other buyers could emerge? Two of AT&T's rivals in the
distribution arena -- Charter and Verizon -- have danced around the
idea of buying content companies but have expressed more interest
in strengthening their "pipes" through acquisitions.
Apple Inc., Google, Facebook and Amazon.com Inc. are all widely
viewed on Wall Street and among media executives as potential
acquirers of media assets, partly because of the moves they've
already made to disrupt traditional TV and film.
Amazon explored the idea of splitting up the Fox assets with
Comcast -- whereby Amazon would get the domestic properties and
Comcast would get international assets -- but the idea didn't
advance so Comcast is proceeding on its own, people familiar with
the matter said.
Apple showed interest in Time Warner -- HBO in particular -- and
considered lobbing in a bid for it before its agreement with
AT&T, people familiar with the matter have said.
Media companies will be on the lookout for partners. "There
isn't a public or private company that isn't rethinking their
assets mix," Ms. Reif said.
Write to Shalini Ramachandran at
shalini.ramachandran@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
June 13, 2018 02:47 ET (06:47 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2018 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Grafico Azioni Time Warner (NYSE:TWX)
Storico
Da Dic 2024 a Gen 2025
Grafico Azioni Time Warner (NYSE:TWX)
Storico
Da Gen 2024 a Gen 2025