VANCOUVER, June 19, 2018 /CNW/ - IDM Mining Ltd. (TSXV: IDM)
(OTCQB: IDMMF)("IDM" or the "Company") is pleased to announce the
results of an updated mineral resource estimate for its 100%-owned
Red Mountain Gold Project ("Red Mountain" or the "Project"),
located in the Golden Triangle of northwestern British Columbia, near the town of
Stewart, BC. The updated mineral
resource estimate includes the results from additional drilling
completed by IDM during 2017, primarily from the underground
workings and incorporates a more robust geological model. The
resource estimate is authored by Dr. Gilles
Arseneau, P.Geo and Andrew
Hamilton, P.Geo with input from IDM's technical team.
Highlights at a 3.0 g/t Au cut-off are as follows, with changes
relative to the 2017 mineral resource estimate:
- 39.2% increase in measured gold ounces or 147,600 oz Au and
measured tonnes increased by 581,900 or 46.7%, maintaining a
high-grade of 8.92 g/t Au and 28.30 g/t Ag;
- 20.7% increase in measured and indicated ("M&I") gold
ounces or 120,900 oz Au to 704,600 ounces of gold plus 2,026,800
ounces of silver at an average grade of 7.91 g/t Au and 22.75 g/t
Ag;
- Measured and indicated tonnes increased by 33.6% or 696,600
tonnes to 2,771,300 tonnes;
- Inferred Resources of 61,400 ounces of gold averaging 6.04 g/t
Au, a slight decrease in ounces of 5.2% primarily due to strong
resource conversion;
- Vast majority of inferred resources in the Marc, AV and JW
converted to M&I;
- Initial resources reported for Smit, SF, Bray, Chicka and Cambria Zones;
- This updated mineral resource estimate, along with improved
geological interpretation and engineering optimization work will
support an updated feasibility study expected to be completed in
the autumn of 2018.
"Our 2017 underground drilling program successfully increased
and upgraded high-grade, bulk-mineable resources at Red Mountain
and demonstrated significant expansion potential with the addition
of several new zones," said Robert
McLeod, President and CEO of IDM Mining. "Coupled
with the advanced stage of the EA and EIS review, along with the
ongoing and thorough consultations with the Nisga'a Lisims
Government, we believe that Red Mountain will be the next
underground gold mine in BC."
"The increase in tonnage and contained metal in the measured
and indicated categories is a material addition to the
deposit," said Ryan Weymark, VP
Project Development. "These additional resources will be
included within an update to the 2017 Feasibility Study, which will
also incorporate an optimized underground mine plan incorporating
opportunities identified through the Value Engineering
phase."
Mineral Resource Estimate
The updated mineral resources for the Red Mountain Project are
reported at a 3.0 g/t Au cut-off with an effective date of
June 15, 2018.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification
|
Tonnes
|
Au
(g/t)
|
Ag
(g/t)
|
Ounces
Au
|
Ounces
Ag
|
Measured
|
1,827,900
|
8.92
|
28.30
|
524,000
|
1,663,300
|
Indicated
|
943,400
|
5.95
|
11.98
|
180,600
|
363,500
|
Measured +
Indicated
|
2,771,300
|
7.91
|
22.75
|
704,600
|
2,026,800
|
Inferred
|
316,000
|
6.04
|
7.60
|
61,400
|
77,200
|
The resource update incorporates information from previous
drilling, plus results from 29,312 meters of drilling completed
during 2017 (104 additional underground, eight surface and three
geotechnical core holes), and local trenching/channel
sampling. Mineralization was primarily modelled at
approximately 2.5 g/t gold grade based on the underground,
bulk-mineable nature of the orebody, primarily amendable to long
hole stoping for main mineralized areas including: Marc, AV, JW and
peripheral zones, with consideration for sulphide mineralization
(primarily pyrite, with local pyrrhotite and sphalerite) and
alteration zonation (primarily sericite and silica).
Mineralized zones generally follow brecciated contacts between host
intrusive (Hillside porphyry) with sediments and volcanic
rocks. The mineralized horizon folded by large amplitude
(>150 meter) folds and separated into different blocks and zones
by post-mineralization faults.
The current mineral resource estimate, effective date
June 15th 2018, was
prepared by Dr. Gilles Arseneau,
P.Geo, and Andrew Hamilton, P.Geo,
using 3D GEMS block modeling software. Resources were
estimated from 415 surface and underground core holes with 622
intercepts within 20 different solids into 4 x 4 x 4 meter
blocks. Interpolation was by ordinary kriging, or
inverse-distance squared methods on smaller or dispersed data sets,
with anisotropic search ellipsoids designed to fit the strike and
dips of the zones. An extensive quality control and quality
assurance ("QA/QC") review was completed on all 2017 and previous
exploration work and a comparative analysis was performed on drill
hole data, underground bulk sampling and geology. Bulk density was
interpolated using inverse-distance squared method where there was
sufficient data populations. For zones with sparse data,
average values from the data available for a given zone were
applied. Comprehensive metallurgical studies have indicated gold
recoveries for the main resource zones (Marc, AV, JW, 141) range
from 88.1% to 92.8% and average 90.9% (tonnage weighted).
Mineral Resource Statement by zone for the Red Mountain
Project at a 3.0 g/t Au cut-off Grade*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zone
|
Class
|
Tonnes
|
Au
(g/t)
|
Ag
(g/t)
|
Ounces
Au
|
Ounces
Ag
|
|
Measured
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marc
|
|
715,100
|
10.65
|
41.46
|
244,800
|
953,300
|
AV
|
|
837,200
|
7.75
|
19.77
|
208,700
|
532,200
|
JW
|
|
275,600
|
7.96
|
20.07
|
70,500
|
177,800
|
|
Total
|
1,827,900
|
8.92
|
28.30
|
524,000
|
1,663,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marc
|
|
9,300
|
11.02
|
45.63
|
3,300
|
13,700
|
AV
|
|
116,500
|
8.47
|
20.81
|
31,700
|
78,000
|
JW
|
|
150,500
|
7.24
|
18.48
|
35,000
|
89,400
|
141
|
|
234,700
|
4.86
|
7.04
|
36,700
|
53,100
|
Smit
|
|
241,400
|
4.54
|
4.64
|
35,200
|
36,000
|
Marc FW
|
|
28,600
|
5.76
|
10.79
|
5,300
|
9,900
|
Marc
Outliers
|
|
12,100
|
5.24
|
28.64
|
2,000
|
11,100
|
NK
|
|
37,500
|
7.40
|
8.26
|
8,900
|
9,900
|
JW HW
|
|
39,900
|
5.66
|
32.28
|
7,300
|
41,400
|
Bray
|
|
57,100
|
5.68
|
10.43
|
10,400
|
19,100
|
Chicka
|
|
15,800
|
9.46
|
3.82
|
4,800
|
1,900
|
|
Total
|
943,400
|
5.95
|
11.98
|
180,600
|
363,500
|
|
M&I
Total
|
2,771,300
|
7.91
|
22.75
|
704,600
|
2,026,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
AV
|
|
3,200
|
9.32
|
12.27
|
900
|
1,200
|
JW
|
|
4,900
|
8.83
|
16.88
|
1,400
|
2,600
|
141
|
|
18,000
|
4.67
|
3.86
|
2,700
|
2,200
|
Smit
|
|
48,100
|
5.28
|
2.26
|
8,200
|
3,500
|
Marc FW
|
|
21,400
|
4.61
|
1.95
|
3,200
|
1,300
|
NK
|
|
500
|
6.79
|
8.19
|
100
|
100
|
JW HW
|
|
2,100
|
7.22
|
3.55
|
500
|
200
|
JW FW
|
|
4,800
|
16.09
|
33.78
|
2,500
|
5,200
|
SF
|
|
54,600
|
6.88
|
17.55
|
12,100
|
30,800
|
Bray
|
|
73,800
|
4.66
|
7.49
|
11,100
|
17,800
|
Chicka
|
|
600
|
5.30
|
1.57
|
100
|
0
|
Cambria
|
|
84,000
|
6.89
|
4.54
|
18600
|
12,300
|
|
Total
|
316,000
|
6.04
|
7.60
|
61,400
|
77,200
|
*Note: 3.0 g/t Au is used as the cut-off grade for
underground mining. Due to typical large thicknesses, bulk mining
methods, primarily longhole stoping are envisioned. Totals may not
add due to rounding.
In the 2017 mineral resource estimate, grade estimates were
based on capped 1.5 meter composited assay data. Gold values
were top cut to 55 g/t and silver values were top cut to 220
g/t. For the updated 2018 mineral resource estimate, it was
decided to cap raw assays with top cuts for gold and silver on a
zone by zone basis, as per the following table, prior to
compositing to 1.5 meters.
Zone
|
Au
Cap
|
Ag
Cap
|
Estimation
Method
|
Marc
|
75.00
|
500.00
|
OK
|
Marc FW &
HW
|
75.00
|
No cap
|
OK
|
NK
|
No cap
|
No cap
|
OK
|
AV
|
55.00
|
200.00
|
OK
|
JW, JW HW & FW,
141
|
40.00
|
200.00
|
OK
|
Smit
|
55.00
|
No cap
|
OK
|
SF, Bray
|
55.00
|
No cap
|
ID2
|
Chicka,
Cambria
|
No cap
|
No cap
|
ID2
|
OK = ordinary kriging; ID2 = inverse distance squared
Sensitivity
The 2018 mineral resource estimate is reported at a 3.0 g/t Au
cut-off grade. Cut-off grades may be re-evaluated considering
prevailing market conditions (including gold prices, exchange rates
and mining costs). Opportunities identified during the Value
Engineering phase show potential for reduced operating costs and
the potential for lowering the cut-off, which will be validated
through the proposed update to the 2017 Feasibility Study. For
example, potentially lowering the cut-off to 2.5 g/t Au would add
301,000 additional M&I tonnes and 85,500 additional inferred
tonnes.
Class
|
Cut
Off
|
Tonnes
|
Au
g/t
|
Ag
g/t
|
Oz
Au
|
Oz
Ag
|
Measured
|
>4.0gpt
|
1,713,200
|
9.27
|
29.04
|
510,800
|
1,599,700
|
>3.5gpt
|
1,780,400
|
9.07
|
28.59
|
519,000
|
1,636,300
|
>3.0gpt
|
1,827,900
|
8.92
|
28.30
|
524,000
|
1,663,300
|
>2.5gpt
|
1,853,600
|
8.83
|
28.16
|
526,300
|
1,678,400
|
>2.0gpt
|
1,868,200
|
8.78
|
28.13
|
527,300
|
1,689,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicated
|
>4.0gpt
|
644,300
|
7.13
|
14.98
|
147,700
|
310,200
|
>3.5gpt
|
759,700
|
6.61
|
13.63
|
161,600
|
332,800
|
>3.0gpt
|
943,400
|
5.95
|
11.98
|
180,600
|
363,500
|
>2.5gpt
|
1,218,600
|
5.23
|
10.02
|
204,900
|
392,600
|
>2.0gpt
|
1,626,000
|
4.48
|
8.01
|
234,200
|
418,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inferred
|
>4.0gpt
|
204,000
|
7.47
|
9.59
|
49,000
|
62,900
|
>3.5gpt
|
247,400
|
6.81
|
8.76
|
54,200
|
69,700
|
>3.0gpt
|
316,000
|
6.04
|
7.60
|
61,400
|
77,200
|
>2.5gpt
|
401,500
|
5.33
|
6.78
|
68,800
|
87,500
|
>2.0gpt
|
532,000
|
4.57
|
5.78
|
78,200
|
98,900
|
The reader is cautioned that the figures in this table are
not a Mineral Resource Statement. The figures are only presented to
show the sensitivity of the resource estimates to the selection of
cut-off grade.
IDM acknowledges the team of geologists that executed the
successful 2017 drilling program ahead of schedule, under budget
and without a lost time incident, as well as completing the
geological and resource modelling herein, specifically:
Natalie King, Marilyne Lacasse, Andrew
Hamilton, John Tejeda,
Christopher Smith, Harley Hoiles, Wes
Hodson and Robert McLeod.
Next Steps
During 2017, step-out holes on 25 meter spacings were completed
on all of the major zones. Geological interpretation
subsequent to the completion of the drilling program noted that
high amplitude folding deformed a brecciated intrusive/sediment
contact zone (see IDM News Release February
13, 2018). Future drilling will target expansion to
gold mineralization along the brecciated horizon, in high-priority
areas such as; between the Marc and 141 Zones, north and west of
the Smit Zone and east of the SF Zone. Additionally, conversion of
inferred resources would be targeted.
IDM intends to update the 2017 Feasibility Study incorporating
the updated M&I resources into the mine plan, as well as the
multiple potential operating and capital efficiencies that were
identified during the Value Engineering phase (see IDM News
Releases November 30, 2017 and
March 20, 2018).
About IDM and Red Mountain
IDM Mining Ltd. is an exploration and development company based
in Vancouver, BC, Canada focused on advancing the Red Mountain
Gold Project towards production. The 17,125 hectare Red
Mountain Gold Project is located in northwestern BC, 15 km
northeast of the mining town of Stewart. In 2017, IDM
announced the results of a Feasibility Study for a high-grade,
underground gold mine, which includes primarily bulk underground
mining methods and the production of gold doré on site. The
Project is advancing through the provincial and federal
environmental assessment processes, with comprehensive, thorough,
and ongoing consultation with Nisga'a Nation. The Project is
currently in the formal review phase of the BC Environmental
Assessment Office and the Canadian Environmental Assessment
Agency.
Technical Report
A technical report, which will include this resource estimate,
will be posted on the Company's website at www.IDMmining.com and
filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com within 45 days.
IDM's updated resource estimate and a virtual tour of the Red
Mountain Gold Project can be viewed at www.Vrify.com and Apple
users can download from the App store. Additional figures and
tables can be viewed in an updated corporate presentation on IDM's
website.
Dr. Gilles Arseneau, P.Geo, a
'Qualified Person' for the purpose of National Instrument 43-101
Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects of the Canadian
securities administrators ("NI 43-101") has approved the disclosure
of, and is the qualified person responsible for, the scientific and
technical information in this news release inclusive of the
resource estimate information. He has verified the data
disclosed.
Rob McLeod, P. Geo, President and
CEO of IDM Mining Ltd. and Ryan
Weymark, P.Eng., Vice-President of Project Development have
reviewed and approved the technical content of this release.
Both are 'Qualified Persons' under NI 43-101.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD
of IDM Mining Ltd.
"Robert McLeod"
President, CEO and Director
"Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services
Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture
Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of
this release."
Forward-Looking Statements: Some statements in
this news release contain forward-looking information or
forward-looking statements for the purposes of applicable
securities laws. These statements include, among others,
statements with respect to the proposed exploration and development
activities and their timing, resource estimates and potential
mineralization, the Company's plan to update its current
feasibility study, These statements address future events and
conditions and, as such, involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors, which may cause the actual
results, performance or achievements to be materially different
from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or
implied by the statements. Such factors include, among others
and in addition to those described elsewhere in this release,
timing and success of future exploration and development
activities, exploration and development risks, delays in obtaining
or inability to obtain required government or other regulatory
approvals, permits or financing, the risk of unexpected variations
in mineral resources, grade or recovery rates, of failure of plant,
equipment or processes to operate as anticipated, of accidents,
labor disputes, and unanticipated delays in completing other
development activities, the risk that estimated costs will be
higher than anticipated and the risk that the proposed mine plan
and recoveries will not be achieved, equipment breakdowns and bad
weather, the timing and success of future exploration and
development activities, exploration and development risks, mineral
resources are not as estimated, title matters, third party
consents, operating hazards, metal prices, political and economic
factors, competitive factors and general economic conditions.
In making the forward-looking statements, the Company has applied
several material assumptions including, but not limited to, the
assumptions that: required regulatory approval, permits and
financing will be obtained; the proposed exploration and
development will proceed as planned; with respect to mineral
resource estimates, the key assumptions and parameters on which
such estimates are based; that the proposed mine plan and
recoveries will be achieved, that capital costs and sustaining
costs will be as estimated, and that no unforeseen accident, fire,
ground instability, flooding, labor disruption, equipment failure,
metallurgical, environmental or other events that could delay or
increase the cost of development will occur, and market
fundamentals will result in sustained metals and minerals
prices. The Company expressly disclaims any intention or
obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise
except as otherwise required by applicable securities
legislation.
View original content with
multimedia:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/idm-mining-announces-resource-update-at-the-red-mountain-gold-project-and-reports-significant-increase-in-measured-and-indicated-resources-300668135.html
SOURCE IDM Mining Ltd.