Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 20-F

 

 

 

¨ REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

 

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

OR

 

¨ SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report                     

Commission file number 001-31930

 

 

ATLATSA RESOURCES CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

NOT APPLICABLE

(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

Suite 1020, 800 West Pender Street

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6C 2V6

(Address of principal executive offices)

Boipelo Lekubo; Tel-27-11-779-6800; Fax-27-11-883-0836

4 th Floor, 82 Grayston Drive, Sandton, Johannesburg, 2146, South Africa

(Name, Telephone, E-mail, and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)


Table of Contents

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

  

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Shares without par value    None

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None

Number of outstanding shares of Registrant’s only class of common stock as of December 31, 2015:

554,421,806 common shares without par value

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act    Yes   ¨     No   x

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.    Yes   ¨     No   x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   x      No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes   ¨     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act

Large accelerated Filer   ¨                 Accelerated Filer   x                  Non-accelerated Filer   ¨

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the Registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

 

U.S. GAAP   ¨

     International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board   x    Other   ¨

If “Other” has been check in response to the previous question, by check mark which financial statement item Registrant has elected to follow:    Item 17   ¨     Item 18   ¨

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes   ¨     No   x

 

 

 


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

     7   

ITEM 1

 

IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS

     16   

ITEM 2

 

OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

     17   

ITEM 3

 

KEY INFORMATION

     18   

ITEM 4

 

INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

     33   

ITEM 4 A

 

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

     71   

ITEM 5

 

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

     72   

ITEM 6

 

DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

     88   

ITEM 7

 

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

     109   

ITEM 8

 

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

     111   

ITEM 9

 

THE OFFER AND LISTING

     112   

ITEM 10

 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

     114   

ITEM 11

 

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

     123   

ITEM 12

 

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY

     124   

ITEM 13

 

DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

     125   

ITEM 14

 

MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

     126   

ITEM 15

 

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

     127   

ITEM 16 A

 

AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

     128   

ITEM 16 B

 

CODE OF ETHICS

     129   

ITEM 16 C

 

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

     130   

ITEM 16 D

 

EXEMPTIONS FROM LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEES

     130   

ITEM 16 E

 

PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

     130   

ITEM 16 F

 

CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

     130   

ITEM 16 G

 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

     130   

ITEM 16 H

 

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

     131   

ITEM 17

 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     132   

ITEM 18

 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     133   

ITEM 19

 

EXHIBITS

     191   

 

3


Table of Contents

GENERAL MATTERS

In this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (“Annual Report”), all references to the “Company” or to “Atlatsa” refers to Atlatsa Resources Corporation and its subsidiaries, unless the context clearly requires otherwise. Certain terms used herein are defined in the text and others are included in the glossary of terms. See “Glossary of Terms”.

Atlatsa uses the Canadian dollar as its reporting currency. All references in this document to “CAD”, “dollars” or “$” are to Canadian dollars, unless otherwise indicated. On February 29, 2016, the noon exchange rate for Canadian dollars as reported by the Bank of Canada was CAD 1.00 = USD 0.7395. On February 29, 2016, the noon exchange rate for South African Rand as reported by the Bank of Canada was ZAR11.66 = USD 1.00. See ITEM 3 - “Key Information” for more detailed currency and conversion information.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, which was furnished to the Commission on a Form 6-K on March 30, 2016, is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, and forms part of the Company’s responses to certain ITEMS of this Annual Report, as stated herein.

Except as noted, the information set forth in this Annual Report is as of March 30, 2016, and all information included in this document should only be considered correct as of such date.

This Annual Report is dated March 30, 2016.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report includes certain statements that constitute forward-looking statements or forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws, including without limitation, statements relating to potential acquisitions and/or disposals, future production, reserve potential, exploration drilling, exploitation activities and events or developments that Atlatsa expects such statements appear in a number of different places in this Annual Report and can be identified by words such as “anticipate”, “estimate”, “project”, “expect”, “intend”, “believe”, “plan”, “forecasts”, “predicts”, “schedule”, “forecast”, “predict”, “will”, “could”, “may”, or their negatives or other comparable words. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause Atlatsa’s actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements that may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Atlatsa believes that such forward-looking statements are based on material factors and reasonable assumptions, including the following assumptions: open cast mining and accelerated development of underground shaft systems at Bokoni Mine will have anticipated positive impacts on operations and production; Bokoni Mine will maintain production levels in accordance with mine operating plan; the Restructure Plan (defined below) will continue to be implemented as planned (see ITEM 4. A.5. Refinance Plan (2012-2014)) and on the expected timeframes and will achieve improvements in production and operational efficiencies as anticipated; the Company’s ability to meet the conditions of utilization of the Term Loan Facility; the Platreef Projects will continue to be positive (see ITEM 4. D.19. The Platreef Project) ; contracted parties provide goods and/or services on the agreed timeframes; equipment necessary for construction and development is available as scheduled and does not incur unforeseen breakdowns; no material labour slowdowns, strikes or community unrest are incurred; plant and equipment functions as specified; geological or financial parameters do not necessitate future mine plan changes; and no geological or technical problems occur. Examples of such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

 

    Bokoni Mine is expected to achieve production levels similar to previous years.

 

    The Restructure Plan is implemented successfully (see ITEM 4. A.4. Bokoni Restructure Plan ) and is anticipated to be fully completed by Quarter 2 of 2016.

 

    The Company expects to be able to continue its financing strategy on favourable terms.

Forward-looking statements, however, are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward looking statements include: uncertainties related to the timing, implementation and financial and operational outcomes expected as a result of the Restructure Plan at Bokoni Mine (see ITEM 4. A.4. Bokoni Restructure Plan ); uncertainties related to the continued implementation of the Bokoni Mine operating plan and opencast mining operations; uncertainties related to the timing of the implementation of the Bokoni Mine deferred expansion plans; fluctuations in market prices, levels of exploitation and exploration successes; changes in and the effect of government policies with respect to mining and natural resource exploration and exploitation; continued availability of capital and financing; general economic, market or business conditions; failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; accidents, labour disputes, industrial unrest and strikes; political instability; suspension of operations and damage to mining property as a result of community unrest and safety incidents; insurrection or war; the effect of HIV/AIDS on labour force availability and turnover; delays in obtaining government approvals; and the Company’s ability to satisfy the terms and conditions of Term Loan Facility, as described in “Liquidity” in

 

4


Table of Contents

the MD&A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, which was furnished on EDGAR on Form 6-K on March 30, 2016 and is specifically incorporated by references herein in its entirety and under “Going Concern” in note 2 of the audited Consolidated Financial Statements. These factors and other risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements are described in further detail under ITEM  3D “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report.

Atlatsa advises investors that these cautionary remarks expressly qualify in their entirety all forward-looking statements attributable to Atlatsa or persons acting on its behalf. Atlatsa assumes no obligation to update its forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting such statements, except as required by law. Investors should carefully review the cautionary notes and risk factors contained in this and other documents that Atlatsa files from time to time with, or furnishes to, Canadian securities regulators or the SEC and which are publicly available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING NON-IFRS MEASURES

Earnings before net finance costs, income tax, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) is not a recognized measure under IFRS and should not be construed as an alternative to net profit or loss determined in accordance with IFRS as an indicator of the financial performance of Atlatsa or as a measure of Atlatsa’s liquidity and cash flows. While EBITDA is a useful supplemental measure of cash flow prior to debt service, changes in working capital, capital expenditures and taxes, the Atlatsa’s method of calculating EBITDA may differ from other issuers and, accordingly, EBITDA may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. Refer to note 38, entitled “Segment Information” of our audited Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal 2015 and 2014, for a reconciliation of EBITDA to net income/(loss) which is publicly available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

CAUTIONARY NOTE TO U.S. INVESTORS

This Annual Report uses the terms “measured resources” and “indicated resources”. Atlatsa advises U.S. investors that while those terms are recognized and required by Canadian securities regulators, the SEC does not recognize them. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any mineralized material in these categories, not already classified as reserves, will ever be converted into reserves. In addition, requirements of National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects of the Canadian Securities Administrators (“NI 43-101”) for identification of “reserves” are not the same as those of the SEC, and reserves reported by Atlatsa in compliance with NI 43-101 may not qualify as “reserves” under SEC standards. Under U.S. standards, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made.

This Annual Report uses the term “inferred resources”. Atlatsa advises U.S. investors that while the term “inferred resources” is recognized and required by Canadian securities regulators, the SEC does not recognize it. “Inferred resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred resources may not form the basis of economic studies, except in rare cases. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.

In addition, disclosure of “contained ounces” in a mineral resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations. However, the SEC normally only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not constitute “reserves” by SEC standards as in place tonnage and grade, without reference to unit measures. Accordingly, information concerning mineral deposits set forth herein may not be comparable to information made public by companies that report in accordance with U.S. standards.

Investors should refer to the disclosure under the heading “Resource Category (Classification) Definitions” in the “Glossary of Terms ” below.

CAUTIONARY NOTE TO READERS CONCERNING TECHNICAL REVIEW OF BOKONI MINE AND WESTERN GA-PHASHA

The following are the principal risk factors and uncertainties which, in management’s opinion, are likely to most directly affect the conclusions of the technical review of the Bokoni Mine and of (Western) Ga-Phasha. Some of the mineralized material classified as a measured and indicated resource has been used in the cash flow analysis. Under U.S. mining standards, a full feasibility study would be required in order for such mineralized material to be included in the cash flow analysis, which would require more detailed studies. Additionally, all necessary mining permits would be required in order to classify these parts of the Bokoni Mine’s and Western Ga-Phasha’s mineralized material as a mineral reserve. There can be no assurance that this mineralized material will become classifiable as a reserve and there is no assurance as to the amount, if any, which might ultimately qualify as a reserve or what the grade of such reserve amounts would be. Data is not complete and cost estimates have been developed, in part, based on the expertise of the individuals participating in the preparation of the technical review and on costs at projects believed to be comparable, and not based on firm price quotes. Costs, including design, procurement,

 

5


Table of Contents

construction and on-going operating costs and metal recoveries could be materially different from those contained in the technical review. There can be no assurance that mining can be conducted at the rates and grades assumed in the technical review. There can be no assurance that the infrastructure facilities can be developed on a timely and cost-effective basis. Energy risks include the potential for significant increases in the cost of fuel and electricity and for fluctuation in the availability of electricity. Projected metal prices have been used for the technical review. The prices of these metals are historically volatile, and the Company has no control or influence over the prices of these metals, which are determined in international markets. There can be no assurance that the prices of platinum, palladium, rhodium, gold, copper or nickel will continue at current levels or that they will not decline below the prices assumed in the technical review. Prices for these commodities have been below the price ranges assumed in the technical report at times during the past ten years and for extended periods of time. The expansion projects described herein will require major financing; probably a combination of debt and equity financing. There can be no assurance that debt and/or equity financing will be available to the Company on acceptable terms or at all. A significant increase in costs of capital could materially adversely affect the value and feasibility of constructing the expansions. Other general risks include those ordinary to large construction projects, including the general uncertainties inherent in engineering and construction cost, the need to comply with generally increasing environmental obligations and the accommodation of local and community concerns. The conclusions, assumptions and economics of the technical review are sensitive to the currency exchange rates, which have been subject to large fluctuations in the last several years. Also see ITEM 3.D. “Risk factors” .

 

6


Table of Contents

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Certain terms used in this Annual Report are defined as follows:

 

2009 Senior Debt Facility    The senior term loan facility provided by RPM to Plateau, which was paid out and extinguished on December 13, 2013.
Advance    RPM has agreed to fund the Bokoni Mine with an advance on the Purchase of Concentrate revenue on the sales made to RPM.
Affiliate    As ascribed thereto in the Securities Act (British Columbia), as amended, except as otherwise provided herein.
AG8    An adjustment to the carrying amount of the financial instrument (i.e. the New Senior Facilities Agreement) should the estimated future cash flows or the interest rate change after the calculation of the effective interest rate on initial recognition. This means that any change in expectations of future cash flows or interest rates are reflected in the adjusted carrying amount, and that change in the carrying amount is recognized immediately as a gain or loss in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.
Amendment Agreement    The Amendment Agreement effecting an increase of $19.3 million (ZAR215.7 million) was signed on May 28, 2013. This was an interim arrangement until the New Senior Facilities Agreement was in place.
Anglo Platinum    Anglo American Platinum Limited, a public company incorporated under the laws of South Africa and whose common shares are listed on the JSE, and includes its subsidiaries where the context requires, a subsidiary of Anglo American plc.
Atlatsa or the Company or the Group    Atlatsa Resources Corporation (previously Anooraq Resources Corporation), a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia and listed on the TSX and the JSE, and includes its subsidiaries where the context requires.
Atlatsa Holdings    Atlatsa Holdings Proprietary Limited, a private company incorporated under the laws of South Africa (formerly known as Pelawan Investments Proprietary Limited).
“B” Preference Shares    Collectively, the 115,800 cumulative convertible preference shares in the authorized capital of Pelawan SPV, the 115,800 cumulative convertible redeemable preference shares in the capital of Plateau and the 111,600 cumulative convertible redeemable preference shares in the capital of Plateau, and is described in ITEM: 4. A.6.3.2. Share Settled Financing – The “B” preference shares.
BIC    Bushveld Igneous Complex.
BEE    Black Economic Empowerment, as envisaged pursuant to the MPRDA and related legislation and guidelines, being a strategy aimed at substantially increasing participation by HDPs at all levels in the economy of South Africa. BEE is aimed at redressing the imbalances of the past caused by the Apartheid system in South Africa, by seeking to substantially and equitably increase the ownership and management of South Africa’s resources by the majority of its citizens and so ensure broader and more meaningful participation in the economy by HDPs.
Beneficial Shareholder    A Shareholder who beneficially owns and holds Common Shares through a broker (or some other intermediary) and who does not hold Common Shares in his, her or its own name.
Board of Directors or Board    The board of directors of Atlatsa.
Boikgantsho    Boikgantsho Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Bokoni Holdco, located on the Northern Limb of the Bushveld Complex in South Africa, on the Drenthe and Witrivier farms, and the Northern portion of the Overysel farm. RPM and Boikgantsho entered into a Sale of Assets Agreement dated March 27, pursuant to which RPM purchased the mineral properties of both farms, and were sold to RPM on December 13, 2013. This subsidiary is dormant as of December 13, 2013.
Bokoni or Bokoni Mine    Bokoni Platinum Mines Proprietary Limited, a private company incorporated under the laws of South Africa, formerly named Richtrau No. 177 Proprietary Limited and which is a wholly

 

7


Table of Contents
   owned subsidiary of Bokoni Holdco. A PGM mine, located on the Eastern Limb of the Bushveld Complex in South Africa on the Diamond, Wintersveld, Jagdlust, Middelpunt, Umkoanesstad, Brakfontein, Avoca, Klipfontein and Zeekoegat farms, formerly named the Lebowa Platinum Mine.
Bokoni Holdco    Bokoni Platinum Holdings Proprietary Limited a private company incorporated under the laws of South Africa which are the holding company of Bokoni Mine, Kwanda, Boikgantsho and Ga-Phasha. The latter two companies have been dormant from December 13, 2013.
Bokoni Group    Bokoni Holdco and all of its subsidiaries.
CAD or $ or dollars    Canadian Dollar or “dollars” or “$”, the currency of Canada.
CEO    Chief Executive Officer.
CCO    Chief Commercial Officer.
CFO    Chief Financial Officer.
COO    Chief Operating Officer.
Common Shares    Common shares without par value in the capital of the Company.
COSO    Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Disinterested Shareholders    In respect of any resolution, all Shareholders except those Shareholders that have an interest in that resolution and in the case of the resolutions to approve the Refinance Plan excludes Anglo Platinum and RPM.
DMR    The Government of South Africa acting through the Minister of Mineral Resources and the Department of Mineral Resources and their respective successors and delegates.
Eastern Ga-Phasha    The Eastern section of Ga-Phasha, located on the Eastern Limb of the Bushveld Complex in South Africa, comprising the farms Paschaskraal and De Kamp, which was sold and transferred to RPM on December 13, 2013.
EDGAR    Electronic Document Gathering and Retrieval System.
Elemental Symbols    Pt – Platinum; Pd – Palladium; Au – Gold; Ag – Silver; Cu – Copper; Cr – Chromium; Ni – Nickel; Pb – Lead; Rh – Rhodium; Ru – Ruthenium.
EBIT    Earnings before interest and taxes (as defined in the Royalty Act).
EBITDA    Earnings before net finance expense, income tax, depreciation and amortization.
Fair value    The fair value of a loan represents the fair value difference between the Company’s cost of borrowing when compared to a market related cost of borrowing available to the Company.
Farm    A term commonly used in South Africa to describe the area of a mineral interest.
Fiscal    Year ending December 31, of the calendar year.
GAAP    General Accepted Accounting Policies.
Ga-Phasha    Ga-Phasha Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited, a private company incorporated under the laws of South Africa which, as of July 1, 2009, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Bokoni Holdco. RPM and Ga-Phasha entered into a Sale of a Portion of a Mining Right Agreement dated March 27, 2013 pursuant to which RPM purchased and Ga-Phasha sold the Eastern section of the Ga-Phasha Project, comprised of Paschaskraal and De Kamp farms on December 13, 2013.
Ga-Phasha Mining Right    The Ga-Phasha Mining Right was a converted mining right, granted to Ga-Phasha, over the area comprising the farms Avoca, De Kamp, Klipfontein and Paschaskraal. The farms Paschaskraal and De Kamp were sold to RPM as noted in the Ga-Phasha Asset Sale Agreement. The Bokoni mining right (LP30/5/1/2/2/59 MR) was amended to include two mineral properties - Avoca

 

8


Table of Contents
   472 KS and Klipfontein 465 KS, which were previously considered part of Ga-Phasha
HDP    A “historically disadvantaged person” as contemplated in the Mineral Development Act, being a person who was discriminated against under the Apartheid system, and includes certain trusts and companies in which such persons has interests, as contemplated in the Bokoni Holdco Shareholders Agreement.
HDSI    Hunter Dickinson Services Inc., a corporation incorporated under the laws of Canada.
HIV/AIDS    Human immunodeficiency virus infection / acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) is a disease of the human immune system caused by infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
Holdco Shareholders Agreement    The Shareholders’ Agreement entered into between Plateau, RPM and Bokoni Holdco, dated March 28, 2008, as amended on May 6, 2009, and amended on March 27, 2013; to govern the relationship between Plateau and RPM as shareholders of Bokoni Holdco.
IFRS    International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
Intermediaries    Brokers, investment firms, cleaning houses and similar entities that own and hold Common Shares on behalf of Beneficial Shareholders.
JIBAR    Johannesburg Interbank Agreed Rate.
JSE    JSE Limited, a company incorporated in accordance with the laws of South Africa, licensed as an exchange under the South African Securities Services Act, 2004.
Ktpm    Kilo tonnes per month.
Kwanda    Kwanda Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited, a private company incorporated under the laws of South Africa which, as of July 1, 2009, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Bokoni Holdco and owns the Kwanda Project, located on the Northern Limb of the Bushveld Complex in South Africa, on 12 farms.
LOM    Life of Mine.
LTIFR    Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (including serious injuries).
Minxcon    Minxcon Proprietary Limited, a private company incorporated under the laws of South Africa.
MD&A    Management’s Discussion and Analysis.
MPH    Middlepunt Hill.
MPRDA    The Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, 2002 (South Africa) or “MPRDA”.
Mining Charter    The Broad Based Socio-Economic Empowerment Charter for the South African mining industry, signed by the DMR, the South African Chamber of Mines and others on October 11, 2002.
N1C    N1C Resources Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Atlatsa incorporated on December 2, 1999 under the laws of the Cayman Islands.
N2C    N2C Resources Inc., a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Atlatsa incorporated on December 2, 1999 under the laws of the Cayman Islands.
NI 43-101    Canadian National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.
New Senior Facilities Agreement    The senior term loan and revolving facility agreement dated March 27, 2013 between Plateau and RPM, pursuant to which RPM made available to Plateau on December 13, 2013, a senior term loan and revolving facility in a total amount of up to $205.8 million (ZAR2,300.0 million). Subsequent to the repayment of $74.8 million (ZAR750.0 million converted at transaction date: January 31, 2014) from the subscription for 125 million Common Shares, in the Company by RPM on January 31, 2014, the facility’s limit for drawdowns, was reduced to $138.7 million

 

9


Table of Contents
   (ZAR1,550.0 million). On December 9, 2015, the Senior Facilities Agreement was amended and restated to increase the availability under the facility by $6.4 million (ZAR71.4 million) to enable Plateau to advance its 51% pro rata share of the backlog of trade and other payables due to RPM of approximately $12.5 million (ZAR140.0 million) to be repaid.
NYSE MKT    NYSE MKT LLC.
OCSF    Operating Cash Flow Shortfall Facility.
Opencast    Klipfontein opencast project.
Pelawan Lock-In Amendments    The amendment agreement entered into between Atlatsa, Plateau and Atlatsa Holdings pursuant to which Atlatsa Holdings has agreed, subject to the completion of the Refinance Plan, to an extension of its lock-in undertakings contained in the Pelawan Shareholders Agreement.
Pelawan Shareholders Agreement    The shareholders agreement between Atlatsa, Plateau, the Pelawan Trust and Atlatsa Holdings dated June 12, 2009.
Pelawan SPV    The Pelawan Finance SPV Proprietary Limited, a special purpose vehicle established by, and wholly-owned subsidiary of, Atlatsa Holdings.
Pelawan Trust    The independent South African trust established in accordance with a trust deed dated September 2, 2004, the trustees of which are Andre Visser, Tumelo Motsisi and Asna Chris Harold Motaung.
PGM    Platinum group metals, comprising platinum, palladium, rhodium, ruthenium, osmium and iridium.
Plateau    Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited, a private company incorporated under the laws of South Africa, being an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Atlatsa.

Project companies or

Projects

   In Fiscal 2015 and 2014, this only included Mining exploration in Kwanda. In Fiscal 2013, this also included Boikgantsho, Kwanda and Ga-Phasha. Boikgantsho and two farms in Ga-Phasha (De Kamp and Paschaskraal) were sold to RPM and the remaining two farms in Ga-Phasha (Avoca and Klipfontein) were transferred to Bokoni Mine on December 13, 2013. See the “ segment information” (note 38) in the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal 2015 for more details.
Platreef Properties    The Platreef PGM properties located on the Northern Limb of the Bushveld Complex in South Africa, which includes the Kwanda, Boikgantsho and Rietfontein projects.
Refinancing Plan    The plan for the refinancing, recapitalization and restructure of the Company and the Bokoni Group completed between 2012 and 2014. See ITEM 4. A.5. Refinance Plan (2012-2014) .
Registered Shareholder    A Shareholder whose name appears on Atlatsa’s central security register as a registered holder of Common Shares as of the Record Date.
Restructure Plan    The restructuring as announced on September 16, 2015. See ITEM 4. A.4. Bokoni Restructure Plan.
Royalty Act    The Mineral and Petroleum Resources Royalty Act, Act No 28 of 2008, in relation to royalties to be levied by the South African state in respect of the transfer of mineral or petroleum resources.
RPM    Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, a public company incorporated under the laws of South Africa, being a wholly owned subsidiary of Anglo Platinum.
SAMREC    The principles contained in the South African Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves of 2007, revised in 2009, also known as the “SAMREC Code”
SARB    South African Reserve Bank
SEC    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

10


Table of Contents
SEDAR    System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval.
Shareholder’s Loan    The portion of the debt between RPM and Bokoni Holdco. When a transaction is with a shareholder at terms and conditions that would not be expected from a third party, it is clear that either the company or the shareholder obtained a benefit because of the shareholder relationship. In respect of loans with shareholders, the difference between the loan received and the amount recognized at fair value on initial recognition, is recognized as a fair value gain or loss directly in equity.
South Africa    The Republic of South Africa.
tpm    tonnes per month.
US or U.S.    United States of America or “United States”.
USD or US$    US Dollar, the currency of the United States of America.
Term Loan Facility    The facility that was entered into with RPM on December 9, 2015, providing a $29.9 million (ZAR334.0 million) facility to enable Plateau to advance its 51% pro-rata share of the shareholder loans to Bokoni Holdco for the sole purpose of enabling Bokoni Mine to fund operating expenses, working capital expenditure and capital expenditure costs in the event that these costs cannot be funded from Bokoni Mine cash flows.
TSX    Toronto Stock Exchange.
TSX-V    TSX Venture Exchange.
Western Ga-Phasha    The Western section of the Ga-Phasha Project, located on the Eastern Limb of the Bushveld Complex in South Africa, comprising the Klipfontein and Avoca mineral properties, which were consolidated with the Bokoni Mine’s activities on December 13, 2013.
Working Capital Facility    On December 13, 2013, Plateau and RPM entered into a Working Capital Facility whereby RPM agreed to make a maximum of $2.7 million (ZAR30 million) per year available to Atlatsa during each of 2013, 2014 and 2015 for an aggregate facility of $8.1 million (ZAR90 million), including capitalized interest to fund Atlatsa’s corporate and administrative expenses through to 2015. See ITEM 4. A.6.7. Working Capital Facility.
ZAR    South African Rand, the currency of South Africa.

 

11


Table of Contents

Geological/Exploration Terms

 

4E grade    The 4E grade is the sum of the grade of Pt, Pd, Rh and Au.
Chromitite    An igneous rock composed mostly of the mineral chromite and found in ultramafic to mafic layered intrusions.
Feldspar    A group of abundant rock-forming minerals, the most widespread of any mineral group and constituting 60% of the earth’s crust.
Feldspathic    Containing feldspar as a principal ingredient.
Gabbro    Course grained mafic igneous rock.
Lithology    Rock composition and structure.
Mafic    Composed of dark ferromagnesian minerals.
Mineral Deposit    A deposit of mineralization that may or may not be ore. Under SEC rules, a mineral reserves or ore is determined by a full feasibility study, and mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time the reserve determination is made. Under Canadian rules, mineral reserves may be determined by a preliminary feasibility study.
Mineralized Material    A mineralized body that has been delineated by appropriately spaced drilling and/or underground sampling to support a sufficient tonnage and average grade of metals to warrant further exploration. Such a deposit does not qualify as a reserve until a comprehensive evaluation based upon unit cost, grade, recoveries, and other material factors conclude legal and economic feasibility. Mineralization classified as “inferred”, is a classification that is acceptable under Canadian regulations (see “Resource Category (Classification) Definitions” below) but cannot be used in a feasibility study and is not recognized by the SEC.
Norite    A coarse-grained plutonic rock in which the chief constituent is basic plagioclase feldspar (labradorite) and the dominant mafic mineral is orthopyroxene (hypersthene).
Pyroxenite    A medium or coarse-grained rock consisting essentially of pyroxene, a common rock forming mineral.
SAMREC Code    South African Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves.
Technical Report    Means a report prepared and filed in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 on the Company’s profile with the Canadian Security Administrators on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
  

Atlatsa’s technical report titled “An Independent Qualified Persons’ Report on the Bokoni Platinum Mine, in the Mpumalanga Province 1 , South Africa” dated April 24, 2013 and filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and furnished on EDGAR at www.sec.gov on May 14, 2013.

The authors of the report were: NJ Odendaal, CJ Muller, D v Heerden, and D Clemente.

 

1   To note: Bokoni Mine is situated in the Limpopo Province and incorrectly referenced as Mpumalanga in the above report. No material change has occurred and there is therefore no need for an updated report.

 

12


Table of Contents

Resource Category (Classification) Definitions

 

Mineral Reserve    Canadian National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) states that the terms “mineral reserve”, “proven mineral reserve” and “probable mineral reserve” have the meanings ascribed to those terms by the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum as the CIM Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves adopted by CIM Council, as amended (“CIM Standards”). CIM Standards defines a “ Mineral Reserve ” as the economically mineable part of a Measured or Indicated Mineral Resource demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study. This study must include adequate information on mining, processing, metallurgical, and economic and other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic extraction can be justified. A Mineral Reserve includes diluting materials and allowances for losses that may occur when the material is mined.
   Mineral reserves are subdivided in order of increasing confidence into Probable Mineral Reserves and Proven Mineral Reserves. A Probable Mineral Reserve has a lower level of confidence than a Proven Mineral Reserve.
   (1) A “ Proven Mineral Reserve ” is the economically mineable part of a Measured Mineral Resource demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study. This study must include adequate information on mining, processing, metallurgical, economic, and other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic extraction is justified.
   (2) A “ Probable Mineral Reserve ” is the economically mineable part of an Indicated and, in some circumstances, a Measured Mineral Resource demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study. This study must include adequate information on mining, processing, metallurgical, economic, and other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic extraction can be justified.
  

Industry Guide 7 – “ Description of Property by Issuers Engaged or to be Engaged in Significant Mining Operations ” (“Industry Guide 7”) of the SEC defines a “reserve” as that part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination.

 

See “Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors” .

Mineral Resource    NI 43-101 states that the terms “mineral resource”, “inferred mineral resource”, “indicated mineral resource” and “measured mineral resource” have the meanings ascribed in those terms by CIM Standards. CIM Standards defines a “ Mineral Resource ” as a concentration or occurrence of diamonds, natural solid inorganic material, or natural solid fossilized organic material including base and precious metals, coal, and industrial minerals in or on the Earth’s crust in such form and quantity and of such a grade or quality that it has reasonable prospects for economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade, geological characteristics and continuity of a Mineral Resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge.
   Mineral Resources are sub-divided, in order of increasing geological confidence, into Inferred, Indicated and Measured categories. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applied to an Indicated Mineral Resource. An Indicated Mineral Resource has a higher level of confidence than an Inferred Mineral Resource but has a lower level of confidence than a Measured Mineral Resource.
   (1) Measured Mineral Resource. A “ Measured Mineral Resource ” is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape and other physical characteristics are so well established that they can be estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic parameters, to support production planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely enough to confirm both geological and grade continuity.
   (2) Indicated Mineral Resource . An “ Indicated Mineral Resource ” is that part of a Mineral

 

13


Table of Contents
   Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape and physical characteristics can be estimated with a level of confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic parameters, to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely enough for geological and grade continuity to be reasonably assumed. Mineralization may be classified as an Indicated Mineral Resource by the qualified person, as such term is defined in NI 43-101 (“QP”), when the nature, quality, quantity and distribution of data are such as to allow confident interpretation of the geological framework and to reasonably assume the continuity of mineralization. An Indicated Mineral Resource estimate is of sufficient quality to support a Preliminary Feasibility Study which can serve as the basis for major development decisions.
  

(3) Inferred Mineral Resource. An “ Inferred Mineral Resource ” is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade or quality can be estimated on the basis of geological evidence and limited sampling and reasonably assumed, but not verified, geological and grade continuity. The estimate is based on limited information and sampling gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes.

Due to the uncertainty that may be attached to Inferred Mineral Resources, it cannot be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource will be upgraded to an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource as a result of continued exploration. Confidence in the estimate is insufficient to allow the meaningful application of technical and economic parameters or to enable an evaluation of economic viability worthy of public disclosure. Inferred Mineral Resources must be excluded from estimates forming the basis of feasibility or other economic studies.

   Mineralization or other natural material of economic interest may be classified as a Measured Mineral Resource by the QP when the nature, quality, quantity and distribution of data are such that the tonnage and grade of the mineralization can be estimated to within close limits and that variation from the estimate would not significantly affect potential economic viability. This category requires a high level of confidence in, and understanding of, the geology and controls of the mineral deposit.
   Industry Guide 7 does not define or recognize resources. As used in this Annual Report, “mineral resources” are as defined in NI 43-101. See “Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors”.

 

14


Table of Contents

Currency and Measurement

All currency amounts in this Annual Report are stated in Canadian dollars unless otherwise indicated. See “ITEM 3 – Key Information” .

Conversion of metric units into imperial equivalents is as follows:

 

Metric Units

  

Multiply by

  

Imperial Units

hectares

   2.471    = acres

meters

   3.281    = feet

kilometres

   0.621    = miles (5,280 feet)

grams

   0.032    = ounces (troy)

tonnes

   1.102    = tons (short) (2,000 lbs)

grams/tonne

   0.029    = ounces (troy)/ton

 

15


Table of Contents

PART I

 

 

ITEM 1 IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not applicable.

 

16


Table of Contents

 

ITEM 2 OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable.

 

17


Table of Contents

 

ITEM 3 KEY INFORMATION

3.A. Selected Financial Data

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with “ITEM 5 – Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and the audited Consolidated Financial Statements, the accompanying notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

The selected consolidated financial data set forth below for the years ended as at December 31, 2015 and 2014 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015 have been derived from the Company’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in ITEM  18 of this Annual Report.

Selected consolidated financial data as at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 and for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 have been derived from the Company’s previously filed audited Consolidated Financial Statements not included in this document.

The selected consolidated financial data as at December 31, 2015 and 2014 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015 should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to, the Company’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in ITEM  18 .

The audited Consolidated Financial Statements from which the following financial data have been derived were prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IFRS”).

 

     Year ended  
     December 31, 2015      December 31, 2014  
     (CAD in thousands)  
     (Except per share info and weighted
average shares in issue)
 

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income information:

     

Revenue

     205,691         237,391   

Operating (loss)

     (416,233      (40,110

Net (loss)

     (368,982      (49,550

(Loss) attributable to owners of Atlatsa

     (167,069      (24,609

Consolidated Statement of financial position information (as at year end):

     

Total assets

     326,388         720,825   

Total equity

     52,551         415,206   

Share capital

     309,691         309,660   

Per share information (CAD cents)

     

Basic (loss)/ per share

     (30 cents      (5 cents

Diluted (loss) per share

     (30 cents      (5 cents

Weighted average shares in issue (number):

     

Average shares outstanding – basic

     553,808,838         541,956,940   

Average shares outstanding – diluted

     553,808,838         541,956,940   

No dividends have been declared for any of the periods above.

     

 

18


Table of Contents
     Year ended  
     December 31,
2013
     December 31,
2012
     December 31,
2011
 
     (CAD in thousands)  
     (Except per share info and weighted average shares in
issue)
 

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income information:

        

Revenue

     195,621         117,557         144,407   

Operating loss

     159,785         (2,548      (89,233

Net profit / (loss)

     99,869         (95,567      (147,865

Loss attributable to owners of Atlatsa

     199,492         (18,718      (81,929

Consolidated Statement of financial position information (as at year end):

        

Total assets

     773,629         814,065         893,009   

Total equity

     379,114         205,257         (28,085

Share capital

     71,967         71,967         71,967   

Per share information (CAD cents)

        

Basic profit / (loss) per share

     47 cents         (4 cents      19 cents   

Diluted profit / (loss) per share

     46 cents         (4 cents      19 cents   

Weighted average shares in issue (number):

        

Average shares outstanding – basic

     426,290,432         424,791,411         424,783,603   

Average shares outstanding – diluted

     429,288,473         424,791,411         424,783,603   

No dividends have been declared for any of the periods above.

        

Exchange rate information

The following table sets forth, for the U.S. dollars, expressed in Canadian dollars, (i) the average of the exchange rates in effect during each period, and (ii) the high and low exchange rates during each period.

 

The U.S. dollar expressed in Canadian dollars for the year ended December 31, or
the respective month (1)(2)(3)

   Average      High      Low  

2011

     0.99         1.06         0.94   

2012

     1.00         1.04         0.97   

2013

     1.03         1.07         0.99   

2014

     1.10         1.16         1.06   

2015

     1.28         1.40         1.17   

September 2015

     1.33         1.40         1.29   

October 2015

     1.31         1.32         1.29   

November 2015

     1.33         1.34         1.31   

December 2015

     1.37         1.40         1.34   

January 2016

     1.42         1.46         1.40   

February 2016

     1.38         1.40         1.35   

 

(1) The average exchange rate for each full year is calculated using the average exchange rate on each day during the year. The average exchange rate for each month is calculated using the average of the daily exchange rates during the month.
(2) Based on noon buying rates as published by the Bank of Canada.
(3) The average exchange rates for Fiscal 2015, as well as monthly data until February 2016 have been calculated with information up to February 29, 2016.

 

19


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth, for ZAR, expressed in Canadian dollars, (i) the average of the exchange rates in effect during each period, and (ii) high and low exchange rates during each period.

 

ZAR expressed in Canadian dollars for the year ended December 31, or
the respective month  (1)(2)

   Average      High      Low  

2011

     0.137         0.149         0.123   

2012

     0.122         0.132         0.111   

2013

     0.107         0.116         0.100   

2014

     0.102         0.106         0.098   

2015

     0.101         0.110         0.087   

September 2015

     0.097         0.099         0.096   

October 2015

     0.097         0.099         0.095   

November 2015

     0.094         0.096         0.092   

December 2015

     0.093         0.096         0.087   

January 2016

     0.087         0.090         0.085   

February 2016

     0.088         0.091         0.084   

 

(1) The average exchange rate for each full year is calculated using the average exchange rate on each day during the year. The average exchange rate for each month is calculated using the average of the daily exchange rates during the month.
(2) Based on noon buying rates as published by the Bank of Canada.
(3) The average exchange rates for Fiscal 2015, as well as monthly data until February 2016 have been calculated with information up to February 29, 2016.

 

ZAR expressed in U.S. dollars for the year ended December 31, or
the respective month (1)(2)

   Average      High      Low  

2011

     0.138         0.152         0.117   

2012

     0.122         0.134         0.111   

2013

     0.104         0.118         0.095   

2014

     0.092         0.097         0.085   

2015

     0.079         0.063         0.089   

September 2015

     0.073         0.072         0.075   

October 2015

     0.074         0.072         0.076   

November 2015

     0.071         0.096         0.073   

December 2015

     0.067         0.070         0.063   

January 2016

     0.061         0.064         0.059   

February 2016

     0.063         0.066         0.062   

 

(1) The average exchange rate for each full year is calculated using the average exchange rate on each day during the year. The average exchange rate for each month is calculated using the average of the daily exchange rates during the month.
(2) Based on noon buying rates as published by the Bank of Canada.
(3) The average exchange rates for Fiscal 2015, as well as monthly data until February 2016 have been calculated with information up to February 28, 2016.

3.B. Capitalization and Indebtedness

Not applicable.

3.C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

 

20


Table of Contents

3.D. Risk Factors

Investment in mining companies such as Atlatsa is highly speculative and subject to numerous and substantial risks.

The Company faces risks in executing its business plan and achieving target production and revenues. The following risks are the known, material risks that the Company faces. If any of these risks occur, the Company’s business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition could be seriously harmed and, under certain circumstances, the Company may not be able to continue business operations as a going concern. Additional risks not currently known to the Company or that the Company currently deems immaterial may also materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition.

In addition to the risks described below, see “Cautionary Note to Readers Concerning Technical Review of Bokoni Mine and Western Ga-Phasha” , for a discussion of the principal risks and uncertainties which, in management’s opinion, are likely to most directly affect the conclusions of the technical review of the Bokoni Mine.

Industry Risks

Bokoni Mine’s operations and profits continue to run the risk of being adversely affected by industrial action and new and existing labour laws

There has been and continues to be an increase in labour relation activity in South Africa, particularly as a result of the five months labour strike by the Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union (“AMCU”) during Fiscal 2014, and in recent years, there have been new labour laws introduced or amendments to existing labour laws that impose additional obligations or grant additional rights to workers, thereby increasing compliance and other costs. This strike did not impact the Company directly; however it did affect the industry as a whole.

Atlatsa did not experience serious labour unrest in Fiscal 2015; however in Quarter Four of Fiscal 2012, labour unrest had a material adverse impact on Bokoni Mine’s operations, production and financial performance. On May 11, 2015, operations at Bokoni Mine were interrupted by community unrest that took place in the Bokoni Mine area when some members of communities surrounding Bokoni Mine blocked the main road leading to the mine with burning tyres and rocks. The unrest prevented employees from reporting to work, which resulted in three days of lost production. Stability was restored to the area on May 14, 2015 and all employees returned to work shortly thereafter. The occurrence of any such events in the future could have further negative impacts upon financial performance and condition.

Greater union activity, including the entry of rival unions, has resulted in more frequent industrial disputes, including violent protests and clashes with police authorities, and has impacted labour negotiations. A number of unions in various industries have continued to threaten to or have recently gone on strike, causing work stoppages and production losses. As a result, South Africa’s sovereign debt credit rating, along with the credit ratings of a number of the country’s leading mining companies was downgraded; Standard & Poor’s ratings services have lowered the long-term foreign currency sovereign credit rating on South Africa to ‘BBB-/A3’ from ‘BBB-’ on December 4, 2015. Standard & Poor also lowered the long-term local currency rating to ‘BBB+/A-2’ from ‘BBB+’. Fitch downgraded South Africa’s long-term foreign and local currency default rating to ‘BBB-’ and ‘BBB’ on December 4, 2015. At ‘Baa2’, Moody’s announced a review to take place in March 2016 with a possible downgrade in sight.

In the event that Bokoni Mine experiences strikes or work stoppages, delays, sabotage, go-slow actions, lower productivity levels than envisaged or any other industrial relations related interruptions or increased employment related costs due to union or employee activity, these may have a material adverse effect on it business, production levels, production targets, results of operations, financial condition and reputation and future prospects. In addition lower levels of mining activity can have a longer term impact on production levels and operating costs, particularly since mining conditions can deteriorate during extended periods without production.

Metal price volatility may render continued commercial production at the Bokoni Mine uneconomic

Atlatsa’s business is strongly affected by the world market price of PGM. PGM prices can be subject to volatile price movements, which can be material and can occur over short periods of time and are affected by numerous factors, all of which are beyond Atlatsa’s control. Industry factors that may affect PGM prices are as follows: the demand in the automotive sectors; industrial and jewellery demand; central bank lending, sales and purchases of PGM; speculative trading; the impact of the five month strike in the PGM industry during Fiscal 2014 and costs of and levels of global PGM production by producers of PGM. PGM prices may also be affected by macroeconomic factors, including: expectations of the future rate of inflation; the strength of, and confidence in, the US$, the currency in which the price of PGM is generally quoted, and other currencies; interest rates; and global or regional, political or economic uncertainties.

 

21


Table of Contents

Subsequent to the strike in Fiscal 2014, it became apparent to a number of speculators that the above ground PGM inventories, particularly platinum, could be much larger than originally anticipated. As a result, PGM prices remained relatively flat and then started to decrease during the latter part of 2014. These negative price movements, together with a downturn in the global economic outlook for commodity consumption and announcements from the three largest platinum producers that their strike affected operations were ramping up to steady state faster than anticipated, resulted in a large number of speculative positions being unwound in the market, such that PGM prices then retreated significantly, back towards their lowest levels since 2008/2009.

In the future, if PGM market prices were to drop and the prices realized by Atlatsa on PGM sales were to decrease significantly and remain at such a level for any substantial period, Atlatsa’s profitability and cash flows would be negatively affected, as is currently experienced with the Company’s cost of sales exceeding its revenue. Depending on the market price of PGM, Atlatsa may determine that it is not economically feasible to continue commercial production at the Bokoni Mine, which would have an adverse impact on Atlatsa’s financial performance and results of operations. In such a circumstance, Atlatsa may also curtail or suspend some or all of its exploration activities, with the result that depleted reserves are not replaced.

Deterioration of economic conditions may adversely affect our business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition

The prices of PGM are volatile, and are affected by numerous economic factors beyond Atlatsa’s control. The level of interest rates, the rate of inflation, world supply of PGM and stability of exchange rates can all cause fluctuations in these prices. Such external economic factors are in turn influenced by changes in international investment patterns, monetary systems and political developments. In January 2016, the International Monetary Fund (“IMF”) downgraded South Africa’s growth prospects for 2016 to 0.7% compared to its previous forecast of 1.3%. The IMF also downgraded its forecast for world economic growth, which is in itself an external factor to keep in mind of world-wide economic conditions.

The prices of PGM have fluctuated in recent years, and future significant price declines could cause commercial production to be uneconomic and may have a material adverse effect on Atlatsa’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Cost of compliance with, or changes in, current and future governmental regulations may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition

The exploration and mining activities of Atlatsa are subject to various South African national, provincial and local laws governing prospecting, development, production, taxes, labour standards and occupational health, mine safety, toxic substance and other matters. Exploration activities and mining are also subject to various national, provincial and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. These laws mandate, among other things, the maintenance of certain air and water quality standards, and land reclamation. These laws also set forth limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. No assurance can be given that new rules and regulations will not be enacted or that existing rules and regulations will not be applied in a manner which could limit or curtail production or development. Amendments to current laws and regulations governing operations and activities of exploration, mining and milling or more stringent implementation thereof could have a material adverse effect on Atlatsa’s business, results of operation and financial condition.

The Company is required to obtain and renew governmental permits in order to conduct mining operations, which is often a costly and time-consuming process

The Company’s current and anticipated future operations, including continued production at the Bokoni Mine, and further exploration or the development of new projects, require permits from various governmental authorities. Obtaining or renewing governmental permits is a complex and time-consuming process. The duration and success of permitting efforts are contingent upon many variables not within the Company’s control, including the interpretation of requirements implemented by the applicable permitting authority. The Company may not be able to obtain or renew permits that are necessary to its operations, or the cost to obtain or renew permits may exceed the Company’s expectations. Failure to comply with permits may disrupt the Company’s operations. Any unexpected delays or costs associated with the permitting process could delay the development or impede the operation of a mine, which could materially adversely affect the Company’s revenues and future growth.

There are uncertainties as to title matters in the mining industry. Any defects in such title could cause the Company to lose its rights in mineral properties and jeopardize its operations

Title to mining properties is subject to potential claims by third parties claiming an interest in them. The mineral properties may be subject to previous unregistered agreements or transfers, and title may be affected by undetected defects or changes in mineral tenure laws. The Company’s mineral interests consist of mineral claims, which have not been surveyed, and therefore, the precise area and location of such claims or rights may be in doubt. The failure to comply with all applicable

 

22


Table of Contents

laws and regulations, including the failure to pay taxes or to carry out and file assessment work, may invalidate title to portions of the properties where the mineral rights are held by Atlatsa.

The Company’s property interests and operations are subject to political risks and uncertainties associated with investment in a foreign country

Changes, if any, in mining laws, investment policies or shifts in political attitude in South Africa may adversely affect Atlatsa’s operations or likelihood of future profitability. Operations may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to, but not limited to, restrictions on production, price controls, export controls, currency remittance, income taxes, royalties, expropriation of property, foreign investment, maintenance of claims, environmental legislation, land use, land claims of local people, water use and mine safety.

For instance, the South African government enacted the Royalty Act, which came into operation on March 1, 2010. The Royalty Act imposes a royalty payable to the South African government by businesses based upon financial profits made through the transfer of mineral resources. As the Bokoni Mine produces metal-in-concentrate, a royalty is payable to the South African government between 0.5% and 7% of gross sales of unrefined mineral resources. Although this royalty payable has been taken into consideration with regard to the Company’s current budgeting and other financial planning processes, any future change in the royalties payable could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Compliance with new and changing corporate governance and public disclosure requirements adds uncertainty to compliance policies and increases costs of compliance

Laws, regulations and standards relating to accounting, corporate governance and public disclosure, new SEC regulations and other listing regulations of the TSX and JSE; applicable to the Company are subject to change and can create uncertainty for companies listed under multi-judicial environments. New or changed laws, regulations and standards could lack specificity or be subject to varying interpretations. Their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty on compliance matters and higher costs of compliance as a result of ongoing revisions to such governance standards.

The Company is subject to reporting on its effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting and may determine in the future that it does not have adequate internal controls over financial reporting

Under Sections 302, 404 and 906, of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Atlatsa is required to furnish a report by management on internal control over financial reporting. The report in this Annual Report contains, among other matters, an assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the fiscal year, including a statement as to whether or not internal controls over financial reporting are effective.

In the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company concluded that it did not have adequate internal controls over financial reporting. The Company has since remediated the material weakness that it disclosed in Fiscal 2014. However; there is no assurance that a control failures or combination of control failures could reoccur in future that could materially affect the business.

The Company is in the process of implementing the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission framework that was issued on May 14, 2013.

Changes to the regulatory environment have been proposed that would significantly affect the mining industry in South Africa

The mining industry in South Africa, where the Company’s projects are located, is subject to extensive government regulation. The regulatory environment is developing, lacks clarity in a number of areas and is subject to interpretation, review and amendment as the mining industry is further developed and liberalized. In addition, the regulatory process entails a public comment process, which makes the outcome of the legislation uncertain and may cause delays in the regulatory process. A number of significant matters have not been finalized, including the legislation dealing with beneficiation.

Mineral beneficiation has become one of the major drivers in advancing the empowerment of historically disadvantaged communities in South Africa. It also presents opportunities for development of new entrepreneurs in large and small mining industries. Atlatsa cannot predict the outcome or timing of any amendments or modifications to applicable regulations or the interpretation thereof, the release of new regulations or their impact on its business.

The Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, 2002 (South Africa) (“MPRDA”), was enacted by the South African Government that deals with the state’s policy towards the future of ownership of minerals rights and the procedures for conducting mining transactions in South Africa. The MPRDA is an ambitious statute with wide-ranging objectives, including

 

23


Table of Contents

sustainable development and the promotion of equitable access to South Africa’s mineral wealth by the inclusion of historically disadvantaged persons (“HDP”) into the industry. The MPRDA came into effect in May 2004.

Proposed amendments to the MPRDA were referred back to the National Assembly in January 2015, for reconsideration and the Company will continue to evaluate any potential impact that these proposed amendments may have on its business. For the remainder of Fiscal 2015, slow progress was made in reconsidering the Amendment Bill, and in March 2016, the DMR Minister announced the establishment of a more streamlined Mineral and Mining Development Board, whom will also undertake the amendments to the MPRDA.

The South African Government issues permits and licenses for prospecting and mining rights to applicants using a “scorecard” approach. Applicants need to demonstrate their eligibility for consideration based upon the number of credits accumulated in terms of quantifiable ownership transformation criteria, such as employment equity and human resource development.

Future amendments to, and interpretations of, the economic empowerment initiatives by the South African Government and the South African courts could adversely affect the business of Atlatsa and its operations and financial condition.

Another sector trend was a focus on compliance amongst South African platinum producers in relation to their BEE credentials, as required in terms of South African mineral legislation and its associated Mining Charter. To that end; South African platinum producers are required to demonstrate compliance as at December 31, 2014, with audit assessments estimated to be finalized by March 31, 2015. Although the due date of the audit assessments have passed, feedback has not be been published. The South African Chamber of Mines, together with certain Industry participants have challenged the Minister on certain legislative and regulatory rule interpretations surrounding the so called “Once empowered always empowered” principle, resulting in parties announcing their intention to seek a declaratory ruling on the matter from the High Court.

Furthermore, while the South African Government has stated that it does not intend to nationalize mining assets or mining companies, certain new smaller political parties have stated publicly and in the media that the government should embark on a program of nationalization. Any threats of, or actual proceedings to, nationalize any of the Company’ assets, could halt or curtail operations, resulting in a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.

Operations are subject to water use licenses, which could impose significant costs and burdens

Under South African laws, the operations are subject to water use licenses that govern each operation’s water usage and that require, among other things, mining operations to achieve and maintain certain water quality limits regarding all water discharges. The Company is required to comply with these regulations under its permits and licenses and any failure to do so could result in the curtailment or halting of production at the affected locations.

Operations are subject to the risk of Land Claims

Under the Land Claims Act, as amended, any person who was dispossessed of rights in land in South Africa after June 19, 1913 as a result of past racially discriminatory laws or practices without payment of just and equitable compensation is granted certain remedies and is entitled to redress. Under the Land Claims Act, persons entitled to institute a land claim were required to lodge their claims by December 31, 1998.

The Land Claims Act also entitles the South African Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform to acquire ownership of land by way of expropriation either for claimants who are entitled to restitution of land, or, in respect of land over which no claim has been lodged but the acquisition of which is directly related to or affected by such claim, will promote restitution of land to claimants or alternative relief. Expropriation would be subject to provisions of legislation and the Constitution, which provide, in general, for just and equitable compensation.

Under the Land Claims Act a successful claimant may be granted either return of the dispossessed land (referred to as “restoration”) or equitable redress (which includes the granting of an appropriate right in alternative state-owned land; or payment of compensation). If restoration is claimed, the Land Claims Act requires, inter alia, the feasibility of such restoration to be considered. Under recent case law, restoration of land may only be given in circumstances where a claimant can use the land productively, with the feasibility of restoration being dependent on the costs.

If successful land claims granted against the Company’s assets, could result in a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.

 

24


Table of Contents

Characteristics of and changes in the tax systems in South Africa could materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations

The Company’s subsidiaries pay different types of governmental taxes in South Africa, including corporation tax, payroll taxes, VAT, state royalties, various forms of duties, dividend withholding tax and interest withholding tax. The tax regime in South Africa is subject to change. Specific areas are addressed below:

Mining Taxation Review

In the 2013 Budget Speech, the Minister of Finance announced that the mineral and petroleum royalty regime has broadened the South African tax base and allowed for increased revenue during periods of high commodity prices, while providing relief to marginal mines when commodity prices and profitability are low. The broader review of the South African tax system will consider whether this approach is sufficiently robust and assess what the most appropriate mining tax regime is to ensure that South Africa remains a competitive investment destination.

To give effect to announcements made by the Minister of Finance in his 2013 budget speech, the Davis Tax Committee was established to assess South Africa’s tax policy framework and its role in supporting the objectives of inclusive growth, employment, development and fiscal sustainability. The Terms of Reference of the Davis Tax Committee includes a review of the current mining tax regime taking account of the following: the agreement between Government, labour and business to ensure that the mining sector contributes to growth and job creation, remains a competitive investment proposition and all role players contribute to better working and living conditions; and the challenges facing the mining sector, including low commodity prices, rising costs, falling outputs and declining margins, as well as to its current contribution to tax revenues.

On June 3, 2014 the Davis Tax Committee called for interested parties to make submissions in respect of the mining taxation review. On August 13, 2015, the Davis Tax Committee released the ‘First Interim report on Mining’ for public comment, with a closing date of October 31, 2015. No further reports have been issued to date.

Carbon Tax/Climate Change Policies

In May 2013, the South African Government released the Carbon Tax Policy Paper which serves as an update to the Carbon Tax Discussion Paper on the introduction of a carbon-pricing mechanism in South Africa with the aim of reducing the emission of greenhouse gases. Currently, the Carbon Tax Policy Paper proposes that the carbon tax be implemented in accordance with a phased approach. The first phase will be for five years, effective from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020. During the first phase, it is proposed that carbon tax be introduced at ZAR120 per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent, increasing at 10% per annum. Further, 60% of emissions would initially be tax exempt. When the tax free thresholds are taken into account, the effective tax rate will range between ZAR12 and ZAR48 per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent.

The second phase for the implementation of the carbon tax will be for another 5 years from 2020 to 2025.

On November 2, 2015 the National Treasury Department issued a draft Carbon Tax bill for public comment. To date, the South African Government has not issued any further updates on the status of Carbon Tax.

The Company is subject to the risk of fluctuations in the relative values of the Canadian Dollar as compared to the South African Rand and the United States Dollar

The Company conducts operations in currencies other than United States or Canadian dollars and may be adversely affected by foreign currency fluctuations. Historically, the Company has primarily generated funds through equity investments into the Company denominated in Canadian Dollars.

In the normal course of business, the Company enters into transactions for the purchase of supplies, services, exploration, development and administrative costs are denominated in ZAR. The Company also has assets, cash and certain liabilities denominated in ZAR. The price of PGM is denominated in US$ and, accordingly, Atlatsa’s revenues, if any, are linked to the US$. As a result, fluctuations in the US$ against the ZAR could have a material adverse effect on Atlatsa’s financial results, which are reported in $.

In addition, South Africa has in the past experienced double digit rates of inflation. If South Africa experiences substantial inflation in the future, the Company’s costs in South African Rand terms will increase significantly, subject to movements in applicable exchange rates. Inflationary pressures may also curtail the Company’s ability to access global financial markets in the longer term and its ability to fund planned capital expenditures and could materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. The South African government’s response to inflation or other significant macro-economic pressures may include the introduction of policies or other measures that could increase the Company’s costs reduce operating margins and materially adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

25


Table of Contents

Price volatility and the unavailability of other commodities may adversely affect the timing and cost of the Company’s projects

The profitability of Atlatsa’s business is affected by the market prices of commodities produced as products at Atlatsa’s mines, such as platinum, palladium, rhodium, gold, nickel and certain other base metals, as well as the cost and availability of commodities which are consumed or otherwise used in connection with Atlatsa’s operations and projects, including, but not limited to, diesel fuel, natural gas, electricity, water, steel and concrete. Prices of such commodities can be subject to volatile price movements, which can be material and can occur over short periods of time, and are affected by factors that are beyond Atlatsa’s control. An increase in the cost, or decrease in the availability, of construction materials such as steel and concrete may affect the timing and cost of Atlatsa’s projects. If Atlatsa’s proceeds from the sale of products were to decrease significantly, or the costs of certain commodities consumed or otherwise used in connection with Atlatsa’s operations and projects were to increase, or their availability to decrease significantly and remain at such levels for a substantial period of time, Atlatsa may determine that it is not economically feasible to continue commercial production at some or all of Atlatsa’s operations or the development of some or all of Atlatsa’s current projects, which could have an adverse impact on Atlatsa.

A shortage of electricity and high electricity prices could adversely affect the Company’s ability to operate its business

The National Energy Regulator of South Africa (“NERSA”) revised Eskom Holdings’ (“Eskom” – the South African national power supplier) power tariff increase during February 2013. The effect of its revision is that power tariff increases in South Africa will be increased as follows:

2013 - 2018: 8% per annum

On October 3, 2014, NERSA announced its approval of Eskom’s implementation plan of the Regulatory Clearing Account balance of $697.8 million (ZAR7.8 billion) relating to the recoupment of losses after it had under-recovered money during the “multi-year-price-determination control period” between 2010 and 2013. Consumers, including Bokoni Mine, will now incur a 12.7% electricity tariff hike in 2015.

On March 1, 2016, NERSA announced its approval of Eskom’s implementation plan of the Regulatory Clearing Account balance of $1,002 million (ZAR11.2 billion) relating to the recoupment of losses after it had under-recovered money during the “multi-year-price-determination control period” between 2013 and 2014. Consumers, including the Bokoni Mine, will incur a 9.4% electricity tariff hike (above the 8% increases approved for the period 2013 to 2018) in April 2016.

The Bokoni Mine’s operations are currently mining at relatively shallow depths with no refrigeration requirements expected for the next 23 years of mining (as Bokoni’s mining license expires in 2038). Power costs currently comprise approximately 7% (varying summer and winter tariffs) of total operating costs at the mine operations. The Bokoni Mine continues to focus efforts on power usage reduction initiatives as part of the efficiency improvement initiatives currently being implemented at the operations.

Bokoni Mine is also dependent on power generated by Eskom, and continues to be at risk for electricity supply interruptions going forward. In June 2014, emergency power cuts took place countrywide after two units at two power stations tripped and a portion of the capacity usually imported from Cahora Bassa became unavailable.

Load shedding was reintroduced in early November 2014 and rolling blackouts were still announced and implemented by Eskom up to March 2015, in a bid to stop a total power grid collapse. Although Eskom and the South African Government have announced a number of short and long-term mitigation plans, there can be no assurance that the Company will not experience power supply interruptions in the future, as rolling blackouts were still happening sporadically during the latter part of Fiscal 2015.

The above increases in prices and possible supply interruptions may have a material adverse effect on Atlatsa’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

The Company is subject to extensive environmental legislation and the costs of complying with these applicable laws and regulations may be significant

Environmental legislation and regulatory compliance has resulted in more stringent environmental assessments in the South African mining industry with a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. There can be no assurance that future changes to environmental regulation, if any, will not adversely affect Atlatsa’s operations, as illustrated by the release of the financial provision regulations under the National Environmental Management Act (“NEMA”) in November 2015. Environmental hazards may exist on the properties in which Atlatsa holds interests which are unknown to Atlatsa at present and which have been caused by previous or existing owners or operators of the properties. Furthermore, compliance with environmental reclamation, closure and other requirements may involve significant costs and other liabilities.

 

26


Table of Contents

The DMR has stated that the department may increase sanctions, including closures, for mines in which fatalities occur because of violations of health and safety rules. The DMR can and does issue, in the ordinary course of its operations, instructions, including Section 54 orders, following safety incidents or accidents to partially or completely halt operations at affected mines (See ITEM 5. A.2.1.6. Safety). It is the Company’s policy to halt production at its operations when serious accidents occur in order to rectify dangerous situations and, if necessary, retrain workers. In addition, there can be no assurance that the unions will not take industrial action in response to such accidents which could lead to losses in the Company’s production. Any additional stoppages in production, or increased costs associated with such incidents, could have a material adverse effect on Atlatsa’s business, operating results and financial condition. Such incidents may also negatively affect the Company reputation with, among others, employees and unions, South African regulators and regulators in other jurisdictions in which Atlatsa operates.

The risks associated with mining and processing pose operational and environmental risks that may not be covered by insurance and may increase costs

The mining industry is subject to significant risks and hazards, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected geological conditions, labour force disruptions, civil strife, unavailability of materials and equipment, weather conditions, pit wall failures, rock bursts, cave-ins, flooding, seismic activity, water conditions and precious metal losses, most of which are beyond Atlatsa’s control. These risks and hazards could result in the following: damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties or producing facilities; personal injury or death; environmental damage; delays in mining; and monetary losses and possible legal liability. As a result, production may fall below historic or estimated levels and Atlatsa may incur significant costs or experience significant delays that could have a material adverse effect on Atlatsa’s financial performance, liquidity and results of operation.

Operations are subject to environmental and health and safety regulations, which could impose additional costs and compliance requirements and the Company, may face claims and liability for breaches, or alleged breaches, of such regulations and other applicable laws.

No assurance can be given that the Company’s insurance will cover such risks and hazards, that the insurance will continue to be available, that it will be available at economically feasible premiums, or that Atlatsa will maintain such insurance. In addition, Atlatsa does not have coverage for certain environmental losses and other risks; as such coverage cannot be purchased at a commercially reasonable cost. The lack of, or insufficiency of, insurance coverage could adversely affect Atlatsa’s cash flow and overall profitability.

Due to the nature of mining and the extensive environmental footprint of the operations, environmental and industrial accidents and pollution may result in operational disruptions such as stoppages which could result in increased production costs as well as financial and regulatory liabilities

Mining by its nature involves significant risks and hazards, including environmental hazards and industrial and mining accidents.

These may include, for example, seismic events, fires, cave-ins and blockages, flooding, discharges of gases and toxic substances, contamination of water, air or soil resources, radioactivity and other accidents or conditions resulting from mining activities including, among other things, blasting and the transport, storage and handling of hazardous materials.

The occurrence of any of these hazards could delay or halt production, increase production costs and result in financial and regulatory liability for the Company.

Atlatsa’s share price is volatile

The market price of a publicly traded stock, especially a resource company like Atlatsa, is affected by many variables not directly related to the mining and exploration success of Atlatsa, including the market for junior resource stocks, the strength of the economy generally, the availability and attractiveness of alternative investments, the liquidity of the stock, and the breadth of the public market for the stock. The effect of these and other factors on the market price of the common shares suggests Atlatsa’s share price will continue to be volatile and the common shares are currently illiquid.

The Company faces intense competition in the mining industry

The mineral exploration and mining business is competitive in all of its phases. Atlatsa competes with numerous other companies and individuals, including competitors with greater financial, technical and other resources than Atlatsa, in the search for and the acquisition of attractive mineral properties and the recruitment and retention of skilled labour. Atlatsa’s ability to acquire properties in the future will depend not only on its ability to develop its present properties, but also on its ability to select and acquire suitable producing properties or prospects for mineral exploration. There is no assurance that Atlatsa will continue to be able to compete successfully with its competitors in acquiring such properties or prospects. Further, Atlatsa has encountered increased competition from other mining companies in its efforts to hire experienced mining professionals. Competition for skilled personnel at all levels is currently very intense, particularly in the mining processing and

 

27


Table of Contents

engineering disciplines. If Atlatsa is unable to recruit and retain qualified employees, this could result in interruptions or decreases in Atlatsa’s production or exploration activities that could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Business Risks

Failure to repay long term borrowings, failure to meet the conditions precedent for financing under current sources of funding and the level of indebtedness may adversely affect the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern

As of February 29, 2016, Atlatsa had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $0.4 million and a contractual value of loans and borrowings of approximately $152.9 million. The Company incurred a net loss for Fiscal 2015 of ($369.0 million) ($31.8 million (excluding impairment loss) compared to a net loss in 2014 of $49.5 million and as of that date its total assets exceeded its total liabilities by $47.6 million (2014: $415.2 million).

After a long history of loss making activities, the profit realized for Fiscal 2013 was based on the profit on the sale of Boikgantsho and the Eastern Ga-Phasha’s mineral properties. For accounting purposes, this sale gave rise to gains of $171.1 million that is reported as “Other income” in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (also refer to note 30 in the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal 2015; shown as a comparative number).

There can be no assurance that Atlatsa will be successful in repaying all of its indebtedness. Atlatsa’s level of indebtedness could have important consequences for its operations, including:

 

    The Company will need to use a large portion of its cash flow to repay principal debt and pay interest on its debt, which will reduce the amount of funds available to finance its operations and other business activities; and

 

    The Company’s debt level may limit its ability to pursue other business opportunities, borrow money for operations or capital expenditures in the future, or implement its business strategy.

Atlatsa’s ability to meet its payment obligations will depend on its future financial performance and the successful implementation of the Restructuring Plan (see ITEM 4. A.4. Bokoni Restructure Plan ), which will be affected by financial, business, economic and other factors. Atlatsa will not be able to control many of these factors, such as economic conditions in the markets in which it operates. Atlatsa cannot be certain that its existing capital resources and future cash flows from operations will be sufficient to allow it to pay principal debt and interest on Atlatsa’s debt and meet its other obligations. If these amounts are insufficient or if there is a contravention of its debt covenants, Atlatsa may be required to refinance all or part of its existing debt, sell assets, borrow more money or issue additional equity. If the Company cannot meet the conditions for financial support provided by RPM, this would impact ability to continue as a going concern.

The repayment terms of the New Senior Facilities Agreement (see ITEM  4. A.6.6.New Senior Facilities Agreement ) include quarterly cash sweeps, when cash is available. Atlatsa will be required to reduce the outstanding balance (including capitalized interest) under the New Senior Facilities Agreement to $100.5 million (ZAR1.0 billion) by December 31, 2018, and to $50.3 million (ZAR500.0 million) by December 31, 2019 and to zero by December 31, 2020. If the Company cannot meet the conditions for financial support provided by RPM, this would impact ability to continue as a going concern.

For specific details regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, see “Going Concern” in note 2 of the audited Consolidated Financial Statements.

Atlatsa has no history of realizing net earnings on operation level

Atlatsa has a long history of losses and there can be no assurance that Atlatsa will achieve or sustain profitability. Atlatsa has not paid any dividends on its shares since incorporation. Atlatsa anticipates that it will retain future earnings and other cash resources for the future operation and development of its business. Atlatsa does not intend to declare or pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Payment of any future dividends is at the discretion of Atlatsa’s board of directors after taking into account many factors including Atlatsa’s operating results, financial conditions and anticipated cash needs.

The Company may not meet its production level and operating cost estimates and, if it does not, its results of operations may be adversely affected

Atlatsa prepares estimates of future production, cash costs and capital costs of production for particular operations. No assurance can be given that such estimates will be achieved. Failure to achieve production or cost estimates or material increases in costs could have an adverse impact on Atlatsa’s future cash flows, profitability, results of operations and financial condition.

Atlatsa’s actual production and costs may vary from estimates for a variety of reasons, including the following: actual ore mined varying from estimates of grade, tonnage, dilution and metallurgical and other characteristics; short-term operating

 

28


Table of Contents

factors relating to the ore reserves, such as the need for sequential development of orebodies and the processing of new or different ore grades; revisions to mine plans; risks and hazards associated with mining; natural phenomena, such as inclement weather conditions, water availability, floods, and earthquakes; and unexpected labour shortages or strikes. Costs of production may also be affected by a variety of factors, including: changing waste-to-ore ratios, ore grade metallurgy, labour costs, the cost of commodities, safety related stoppages, general inflationary pressures and currency exchange rates.

Delays or unexpected problems on projects may adversely affect the Company’s ability to sustain or increase the Company’s present level of production

Atlatsa’s ability to sustain or increase its present levels of PGM production is dependent on the success of its projects. There are many risks and unknowns inherent in all projects. For example, the economic feasibility of projects is based upon many factors, including the following: the accuracy of reserve estimates; metallurgical recoveries with respect to PGM; capital and operating costs of such projects; the future prices of the relevant minerals; and the ability to secure appropriate financing for product development. Projects also require the successful completion of feasibility studies, the resolution of various fiscal, tax and royalty matters, the issuance of necessary governmental permits and the acquisition of satisfactory surface or other land rights. It may also be necessary for Atlatsa to, among other things, find or generate suitable sources of power and water for a project, ensure that appropriate community infrastructure is developed by third parties to support the project, and secure appropriate financing to fund these expenditures.

The capital expenditures and time required to develop new mines or other projects are considerable and changes in costs or construction schedules can affect project economics. Thus, it is possible that actual costs may increase significantly and economic returns may differ materially from Atlatsa’s estimates, that metal prices may decrease significantly, or that Atlatsa could fail to obtain the satisfactory resolution of fiscal and tax matters or the governmental approvals necessary for the operation of a project or obtain project financing on acceptable terms and conditions or at all, in which case, the project may not proceed, either on its original timing, or at all. It is not unusual in the mining industry for new mining operations to experience unexpected problems during the start-up phase, resulting in delays and requiring more capital than anticipated.

The Company is dependent on third parties

Atlatsa’s sole revenue stream is currently derived from the sale of PGM metal-in-concentrate produced at the Bokoni Mine. All of this metal-in-concentrate is sold to RPM pursuant to a sale of concentrate agreement. Atlatsa relies on RPM as its sole revenue source, and its success in part depends on RPM performing its obligations under the sale of concentrate agreement. While not anticipated, there can be no assurance that RPM will be able to, or will, perform its obligations under the sale of concentrate agreement in the future.

Disputes or disagreements with third parties who jointly own many of the Company’s assets could adversely affect our business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition

Atlatsa holds the bulk of its assets through Plateau’s 51% ownership of Bokoni Holdco, the remaining 49% being held by RPM. Plateau’s interests in these projects are subject to the risks normally associated with the joint ownership of operations. The existence or occurrence of one or more of the following circumstances and events could have a material adverse impact on Plateau’s profitability or the viability of its interests held through Bokoni Holdco, which could have a material adverse impact on Atlatsa’s future cash flows, earnings, results of operations and financial condition: (i) disagreement with Anglo Platinum or RPM on how to proceed with exploration programs and how to develop and operate mines efficiently; (ii) inability of Atlatsa and Anglo Platinum to meet their obligations in respect of jointly owned properties; and (iii) litigation between Atlatsa and Anglo Platinum regarding jointly owned property. Future disputes and disagreements with business partners could adversely affect the business of Atlatsa and its operations and financial condition.

Actual and potential supply chain shortages and increases in the prices of production inputs may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations and profits

Atlatsa’s results of operations may be affected by the availability and pricing of raw materials and other essential production inputs, including fuel, timber, explosives and other working materials currently all sources from Anglo Platinum. The price and quality of raw materials may be substantially affected by changes in global supply and demand, weather conditions, governmental controls, a dispute between the Company and Anglo Platinum and other factors. A sustained interruption in the supply of any of these materials would require the Company to find acceptable substitute suppliers and could require it to pay higher prices for such materials. Any significant increase in the prices of these materials will increase the Company’s operating costs and affect production considerations.

Certain factors may affect our ability to support the carrying value of our property, plant and equipment, goodwill and other assets on our balance sheet

 

29


Table of Contents

The Company reviews and tests the carrying value of its assets when events or changes in circumstances suggest that this amount may not be recoverable.

At least on an annual basis for goodwill, and when there are indications that impairment of property, plant and equipment and other assets may have occurred, estimates of expected future cash flows for each group of assets are prepared. These estimates are prepared at the lowest level at which identifiable cash flows are considered as being independent of the cash flows of other mining assets and liabilities. Expected future cash flows are inherently uncertain, and could materially change over time. Such cash flows are significantly affected by reserve and production estimates, together with economic factors such as spot and forward looking platinum prices, discount rates, currency exchange rates, estimates of costs to produce reserves and future capital expenditures.

As at June 30, 2015, impairment charges in the amount of $337.1 million (converted at June 30, 2015 ruling exchange rates), relating to property, plant and equipment and other assets were recorded and if any one or a combination of these uncertainties should occur, management may be required to recognize further impairment charges, which could affect the Company’s financial results and condition.

Atlatsa utilizes information technology and communications systems, the failure of which could significantly impact its operations and business

Atlatsa utilizes and is reliant on various information technology and communications systems, in particular SAP, payroll and time and attendance applications. Damage or interruption to the Company’s information technology and communications systems, whether due to accidents, human error, natural events or malicious acts, may lead to important data being irretrievably lost or damaged, thereby adversely affecting the Company’s business, prospects and results of operations. This also includes the risk of cyber-security incidents.

The loss of key personnel and workforce unavailability could harm the Company’s mining operations and projects

Atlatsa is dependent on a relatively small number of key employees, the loss of any of whom could have an adverse effect on Atlatsa. The Company also does not maintain any “key person” insurance.

HIV/AIDS is prevalent in Southern Africa. Employees or contractors of the Company may have or could contract this potentially deadly virus. Generally, the prevalence of HIV/AIDS could cause lost employee man hours and the emigration of skilled employees could adversely affect Atlatsa’s ability to retain its employees.

Atlatsa is dependent on a workforce which is largely unionized, with the majority of the workforce belonging to three competing unions. This poses a risk in that union disputes may give rise to industrial action and work stoppages, including strikes, from time to time. Communication and negotiating forums have been established with all union representatives and employees in order to mitigate this risk.

The Company’s development to date has depended, and in the future will continue to depend, on the efforts of its senior management. The Company currently does not, and does not intend to, have key person insurance for key positions. Departures by members of senior management could have a negative impact on the Company’s business, as the Company may not be able to find suitable personnel to replace departing management on a timely basis or at all.

The loss of any member of the senior management team could impair the Company’s ability to execute its business plan and could therefore have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Capital structure and ability to raise new equity

Atlatsa’s ability to raise new equity in the equity capital markets is subject to the mandatory requirement that Atlatsa Holdings, its majority BEE shareholder, retain a 51% fully diluted shareholding in the Company up until December 31, 2020, as required by covenants given by Atlatsa Holdings and Atlatsa in favor of the South African Reserve Bank (“SARB”) and Anglo Platinum; post transaction. The ability of Atlatsa to access the bank public debt or equity capital markets on an efficient basis may be constrained by the dislocation in the credit markets, capital and/or liquidity constraints in the banking markets and equity conditions at the time of issuance.

Mineral reserves and resources are only estimates, and there can be no assurance that the estimated reserves and resources are accurate or that the Company will achieve indicated levels of PGM recovery

Atlatsa’s mineral reserves and mineral resources are estimates, and no assurance can be given that the estimated reserves and resources are accurate or that the indicated level of PGM or any other mineral will be produced. Such estimates are, in large part, based on interpretations of geological data obtained from drill holes and other sampling techniques. Actual mineralization or formations may be different from those predicted. Further, it may take many years from the initial phase of drilling before production is possible, and during that time the economic feasibility of exploiting a discovery may change.

 

30


Table of Contents

The SEC does not permit United States mining companies in their filings with the SEC to disclose estimates other than mineral reserves. However this Annual Report also contains resource estimates, which are required by NI 43-101. Mineral resource estimates that do not qualify as reserves are based, in many instances, on limited and widely spaced drill hole information, which is not necessarily indicative of the conditions between and around drill holes. Accordingly, such mineral resource estimates may require revision as more drilling information becomes available or as actual production experience is gained. No assurance can be given that any part or all of Atlatsa’s mineral resources not already qualifying as reserves will be converted into reserves. See “Cautionary Note to Investors Concerning Estimates of Measured and Indicated Resources”, “Cautionary Note to Investors Concerning Estimates of Inferred Resources” and “Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors ”. Market price fluctuations of PGM, as well as increased production and capital costs or reduced recovery rates, may render Atlatsa’s proven and probable reserves unprofitable to develop at a particular site or sites for periods of time or may render mineral reserves containing relatively lower grade mineralization uneconomic. Moreover, short-term operating factors relating to the mineral reserves, such as the need for the orderly development of orebodies or the processing of new or different ore grades, may cause mineral reserves to be reduced or Atlatsa to be unprofitable in any particular accounting period. Estimated reserves may have to be recalculated based on actual production experience. Any of these factors may require Atlatsa to reduce its mineral reserves and resources, which could have a negative impact on Atlatsa’s financial results. Failure to obtain or maintain necessary permits or government approvals or changes to applicable legislation could also cause Atlatsa to reduce its reserves. There is also no assurance that Atlatsa will achieve indicated levels of PGM recovery or obtain the prices assumed in determining such reserves.

There is no certainty that the Company’s future exploration and development activities will be commercially successful

The exploration for and development of mineral deposits involves significant risks, which even a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not eliminate. Few properties explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Significant expenditures may be required to locate and establish mineral reserves, to develop metallurgical processes and to construct mining and processing facilities at a particular site. It is impossible to ensure that the current exploration programs planned by Atlatsa will result in a profitable commercial mining operation. Significant capital investment is required to achieve commercial production from successful exploration efforts.

The commercial viability of a mineral deposit is dependent upon a number of factors. These include deposit attributes such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure, current and future metal prices (which can be cyclical), and government regulations, including those relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals and necessary supplies and environmental protection. The complete effect of these factors, either alone or in combination, cannot be entirely predicted, and their impact may result in Atlatsa not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.

The Company’s current exploration projects may not result in discoveries of commercial recoverable quantities of ore

Kwanda is in the exploration stage as opposed to the development stage and has no known body of economic mineralization. The known mineralization at the Kwanda Project has not been determined to be ore. There can be no assurance that commercially mineable ore bodies exist. There is no certainty that any expenditure made in the exploration of the Company’s undeveloped mineral properties will result in discoveries of commercially recoverable quantities of ore. Such assurance will require completion of final comprehensive feasibility studies and, possibly, further associated exploration and other work that concludes a potential mine at each of these projects is likely to be economic. In order to carry out exploration and development programs of any economic ore body and place it into commercial production, the Company must raise substantial additional funding.

Failure to replace depleted reserves will result in declining production levels over the long term

The Bokoni Mine is Atlatsa’s only producing property. Atlatsa must seek to expand the operating areas of the Bokoni Mine and develop other properties to replace reserves depleted by production to maintain production levels over the long term. Reserves also can be replaced by expanding known orebodies, locating new deposits or making acquisitions. Exploration is highly speculative in nature. Atlatsa’s exploration projects involve many risks and may be unsuccessful. Once a site with mineralization is discovered, it may take several years from the initial phases of drilling until production is possible, during which time the economic feasibility of production may change. Substantial expenditures are required to establish proven and probable reserves and to construct mining and processing facilities. As a result, there is no assurance that current or future exploration programs will be successful. There is a risk that depletion of reserves will not be offset by expansion, discoveries or acquisitions. The mineral base of Atlatsa may decline if reserves are mined without adequate development and replacement, and Atlatsa may not be able to sustain production beyond the current life of mine (“LOM”), based on current production rates and development.

Enforcement of judgments or bringing actions inside the United States against the Company or its directors and officers may be difficult for U.S. investors

The Company is a Canadian corporation, with its principal place of business in South Africa. A majority of the Company’s directors and officers and some or all of the experts named in this Annual Report are not residents of the United States and substantially all of the Company’s assets and the assets of a majority of the Company’s directors and officers and the experts

 

31


Table of Contents

named in this Annual Report are located outside the United States. Consequently, it may be difficult for U.S. investors to effect service of process within the United States upon the Company or its directors or officers or such experts who are not residents of the United States, or to rely in the United States upon judgments of courts of the United States predicated upon civil liabilities under United States securities laws. Investors should not assume that courts outside of the United States (1) would enforce judgments of United States courts obtained in actions against the Company or such directors, officers or experts predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws or the securities or “blue sky” laws of any state within the United States or (2) would enforce, in original actions, liabilities against the Company or such directors, officers or experts predicated upon the U.S. federal securities laws or any such state securities or “blue sky” laws.

The Company is subject to exchange control regulations that may affect its ability to transfer assets to or from its foreign subsidiaries and to fund its operations efficiently

South African law provides for exchange control regulations that restrict the export of capital. The exchange control regulations, which are administered by the SARB, regulate transactions involving South African residents, including legal entities, and limit a South African company’s ability to borrow from and repay loans to non-residents and to provide guarantees for the obligations of its affiliates with regard to funds obtained from non-residents.

A portion of the Company’s funding for its South African operations consist of loans advanced to its South African subsidiaries from subsidiaries that are non-residents of South Africa. The Company is in compliance with SARB regulations and is therefore not subject to restrictions on the ability of its South African subsidiaries to transfer funds to the Company or to other subsidiaries. In addition, the SARB has introduced various measures in recent years to relax the exchange controls in South Africa to entice foreign investment in the country. However, if more burdensome exchange controls were proposed or adopted by the SARB in the future, or if the Company was unable to comply with existing SARB regulations, such exchange control regulations could restrict the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to repatriate funds needed to effectively finance the Company’s operations. Any such limitations, or the perception that such limitations could exist in the future, could have an adverse impact on the Company’s business and share price.

There may be adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. shareholders if Atlatsa is or becomes a “passive foreign investment company” under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.

If Atlatsa is classified as a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder holds the Common Shares, certain adverse U.S. federal income tax rules could apply to such U.S. Holder. Atlatsa believes that it was not a PFIC in the 2015 taxable year, but has not made a determination as to its PFIC status for the 2016 taxable year or any future year. The determination of whether Atlatsa is a PFIC for a taxable year depends, in part, on the application of complex U.S. federal income tax rules, which are subject to different interpretations, and the determination will depend on the composition of Atlatsa’s income, expenses and assets from time to time and the nature of the activities performed by its officers and employees. U.S. Holders should carefully read “Taxation - U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules” for more information and consult their own tax advisors regarding the likelihood and consequences of Atlatsa being treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, including the advisability of making certain elections that may mitigate certain possible adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders.

The Company may be involved with deep groundwater pollution

Bokoni Mine has identified a future pollution risk posed by deep groundwater in certain underground shafts. Various studies have been undertaken by the mine since 2012. In view of the documentation of current information for the accurate estimation of the liability, we are unable to quantify the extent of either the existence or extent of pollution or its source, if any. As such the criteria in IAS 37 for recognizing a liability have not been met.

 

32


Table of Contents

 

ITEM 4 INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

 

4. A. History and development of the Company

4. A.1. Name, Address and Incorporation; Trading Markets

Atlatsa Resources Corporation (formerly known as Anooraq Resources Corporation) was incorporated on April 19, 1983 under the Companies Act (British Columbia), the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada. The Company was transitioned under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) on June 11, 2004, on which date the Company altered its Notice of Articles to change its authorized share structure from 200,000,000 common shares without par value to an unlimited number of common shares without par value.

The Company’s registered office is Suite 1700, Park place, 666 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 2X8, Canada, telephone: (604) 631-1300, facsimile: (604) 681-1825. The South African head office of the Company is located at 4th Floor – 82 Grayston Drive, Off Esterhysen Lane, Sandton, South Africa, 2146, telephone: +27 11 883 0800, facsimile: +27 11 883 0836.

The Company’s common shares are listed for trading on the TSX (symbol ATL), and the JSE (symbol ATL).

On July 10, 2015, the Company announced its intention to file a Form 25 (Notification of Removal from Listing and/or Registration under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) with the SEC to voluntarily withdraw its common shares from listing on the NYSE MKT. The Company filed the Form 25 on July 20, 2015 and the delisting was effective 10 days following the filing of the Form 25. The Company remains an SEC registrant and will review this position prior to the first anniversary of the delisting off the NYSE MKT. The Company’s common shares continue to be listed on the TSX and the JSE.

4. A.2. General Development of the Business

For the period 1983 to June 30, 2009, the Company was primarily an exploration company and, therefore, did not have any significant operating assets.

From 1996 to mid-1999, the Company’s mineral exploration was focused on metal prospects located in Mexico. In October 1999, the Company refocused its exploration on a South African PGM project, the Platreef Project. The Company has two active Cayman Islands subsidiaries, N1C and N2C. These two subsidiaries were incorporated on December 2, 1999 under the laws of the Cayman Islands. The Company holds 100% of the shares of N1C, which in turn holds 100% of the N2C shares.

In September 2004, the Company and Atlatsa Holdings, a private South African company, completed a transaction combining their respective PGM assets, comprising the Company’s PGM projects on the Northern and Western Limbs of the Bushveld Igneous Complex (“BIC”) and Atlatsa Holding’s 50% participation interest in Ga-Phasha (previously known as “Paschaskraal”) on the Eastern Limb of the BIC in the Republic of South Africa (“the Pelawan transaction”).

Pursuant to the terms of the Pelawan transaction, which constituted a reverse take-over under the policies of the TSX-V, the Company acquired Atlatsa Holding’s rights to its 50% participation interest in Ga-Phasha in return for 91.2 million Atlatsa common shares (63% of the total outstanding shares in Atlatsa at that time) and a cash payment of $1.4 million (ZAR15.7 million). By completing the reverse take-over with Atlatsa Holdings, Atlatsa reconstituted itself as a BEE company in South Africa with a view to positioning itself for greater opportunities within the South African mineral sector.

This strategy was successful in 2007 when Atlatsa announced a major BEE transaction with Anglo Platinum pursuant to which the two corporations determined to combine all of their existing joint venture interests, together with 100% of Anglo Platinum’s Bokoni Mine (formerly Lebowa), under a new group structure, the Bokoni Group.

The “Bokoni Transaction” was completed on July 1, 2009, which was the most important year in Atlatsa’s history. On July 1, 2009, the Company acquired 51% of the Bokoni Mine and took operational control of the Bokoni Mine and the Bokoni Group. RPM retained a 49% non-controlling interest in Bokoni Holdco. This was the first operating asset acquired by the Company that generated revenue. There was therefore a significant increase in the asset base of the Company as revenue generating assets were effectively acquired and the Company transformed from an exploration and development company into a PGM producer through the Bokoni Transaction.

The Bokoni Transaction was a step towards Atlatsa’s objective to become a significant PGM producer with a diversified PGM asset base, including production and exploration assets. Atlatsa controls a significant estimated mineral resource base of approximately 56 million ounces in the measured category, 27.7 million ounces in the indicated category and 70.5 million ounces in the inferred category. Of this estimated mineral resource base, approximately 28.5 million ounces in the measured category, 14.1 million ounces in the indicated category and 36 million ounces in the inferred category are attributable to Atlatsa. See page 13 of Atlatsa’s technical report titled “An Independent Qualified Persons’ Report on the Bokoni Platinum Mine, in the

 

33


Table of Contents

Mpumalanga Province, South Africa” dated April 24, 2013 and filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and furnished on EDGAR on Form 6-K, at www.sec.gov on May 14, 2013. 2

For the year ended December 31, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2011, Atlatsa focused on implementing the foundation for its turnaround strategy at the Bokoni Mine operations. On February 2, 2012, the Company and Anglo Platinum announced the parties’ conclusion of a term sheet comprising the first iteration of the Refinance Plan (see ITEM 4. A.5. Refinance Plan (2012-2014) ).

Subsequent to announcing the material terms of the Refinancing Plan in February 2012, the Company announced that it, together with Anglo Platinum and the management of Bokoni had undertaken a strategic review of the Bokoni Mine operations in order to assess the optimal operating and financial plan for the Bokoni Mine going forward. See ITEM 4. B.2. Atlatsa’s Business Strategy .

Until January 31, 2014, N2C held 100% of the shares of Plateau, a private South African mining corporation acquired by Atlatsa on August 28, 2001. On January 31, 2014, with the conversion of the “B” preference shares (part of the refinancing plan, see ITEM 4. A.5. Refinance Plan (2012-2014) ), Atlatsa now holds 53% and N2C 47% of Plateau. Atlatsa holds its assets and interests in South Africa through Plateau.

On September 16, 2015, the Company announced that it, together with its joint venture partner, Anglo Platinum, had determined to implement a restructure plan at Bokoni Mine. See ITEM 4. A.4. Bokoni Restructure Plan for more detail.

On August 17, 2015, the British Columbia Securities Commission issued a management cease trade order to Atlatsa for failure to file certain continuous disclosure documents as required by applicable securities law. Harold Motaung and Boipelo Lekubo each were subject to the cease trade order. Atlatsa subsequently filed the documents that were the subject of the initial default and the management cease trade order was revoked by the British Columbia Securities Commission on December 11, 2015.

On December 9, 2015, Plateau entered into a Term Loan Facility Agreement ( see ITEM 4. A.6.9. Term Loan Facility ) with RPM, providing a $29.9 million (ZAR334.0 million) facility to enable Plateau to advance its 51% pro-rate share of the shareholder loans to Holdco for the sole purpose of enabling Bokoni Mine to fund operating expenses, working capital expenditure and capital expenditure costs in the event that these costs cannot be funded from Bokoni Mine cash flows.

In addition, on December 9, 2015, the New Senior Facilities Agreement was increased by $6.4 million (ZAR71.4 million) to make available funds to Plateau to repay its share of the $12.5 million (ZAR140.0 million) backlog of trade and other payables (see ITEM 4. A.6.6.New Senior Facilities Agreement ).

In this Annual Report, Fiscal 2015 and 2014 are further discussed in detail.

4. A.3. Ownership Structure

As discussed above, the “Bokoni Transaction” was completed on July 1, 2009 and Atlatsa, through its wholly owned South African subsidiary, Plateau, holds a 51% controlling interest and management control in Bokoni Holdco. Bokoni Holdco holds a 100% interest in several PGM projects, including the operating Bokoni Mine, exploration companies Boikgantsho, Ga Phasha and Kwanda. As a result of a transaction with RPM on December 13, 2013, Boikgantsho and Ga Phasha do not currently hold any mineral properties and are now dormant.

Atlatsa also holds direct interest in the Central Block properties (see ITEM  4. D.19.4. Central Block ) and indirect in the Kwanda and Rietfontein properties (see ITEMS 4. D.19.3. Rietfontein Block and 4. D.19.5. Kwanda Project (North Block and South Block respectively).

 

2   To note: Bokoni Mine is situated in the Limpopo Province and incorrectly referenced as Mpumalanga in the above report. No material change has occurred and there is therefore no need for an updated report.

 

34


Table of Contents

The corporate structure of Atlatsa and its subsidiaries as of the date hereof, was as follows:

 

 

LOGO

 

* Black Economic Empowerment.
** ESOP Trust is consolidated into the Company.
# Dormant as of December 13, 2013.
^ Bokoni Rehabilitation Trust is consolidated into Bokoni.

4. A.4. Bokoni Restructure Plan

On September 16, 2015, the Company announced, together with Anglo Platinum, that to ensure the future optimization of Bokoni Mine, the Company will implement an operational and financial restructure plan at Bokoni Mine. The primary objective of the Restructure Plan (“Restructure Plan”) (see “Going Concern” in note 2 of the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal 2015 for the necessity of the Restructure Plan) is to enable Bokoni Mine to endure a prolonged period of depressed PGM commodity prices, by reducing its existing cost structure and increasing production volumes of higher grade ore from underground operations.

The Restructure Plan was based on the following assumptions for Fiscal 2016:

 

    Platinum price per ounce over life of mine: US$1,392

 

    4E average basket price per ounce: ZAR13,545

 

35


Table of Contents
    ZAR/US$ exchange rate: 11.92

Implementation of the Restructure Plan at Bokoni Mine is anticipated to result in:

 

    the older, high cost UM2 and Vertical Merensky shaft operations being placed on care and maintenance in August and December 2015, respectively; the relevant assets have also been impaired;

 

    continued ramp up of the Middelpunt Hill UG2 and Brakfontein Merensky development shafts to steady state production of 60,000 tonnes per month (“tpm”) the fourth quarter of 2016 and 100,000 tpm by 2019, respectively;

 

    continued mining at the Klipfontein Merensky opencast operation as a mill gap filler during ramp up of the underground operations;

 

    significant reduction in labour overheads; and

 

    reduction in Bokoni Mine’s unit cost of production.

Bokoni Mine issued a Section 189 (3) notice to relevant parties pursuant to Section 189A of the South African Labour Relations Act, 66 of 1995 (“LRA”) on September 15, 2015, for the commencement of a consultation process on the contemplated retrenchments of its employees based on operational requirements.

The anticipated costs of implementing the Restructure Plan will be financed from operating cash flows and the Term Loan Facility provided by RPM (See ITEM 4. A.6.9. Term Loan Facility ).

As at December 31, 2015 the restructure plan was underway and is anticipated to be fully completed by Quarter 2 of 2016. To date, on base cost calculated from August 2015, operational costs have reduced by 15% on average per month, which was achieved by a substantial reduction in Bokoni’s labour force. Bokoni Mine labour complement reduced by 8.0% from 6,101 as at December 31, 2014 to 5,613 as at December 31, 2015. The reduction is made up of a 13.4% decrease in contractors and a 4.3% decrease in own mine employees (see ITEM 4.D.5. Personnel ).

4. A.5. Refinance Plan (2012-2014)

On February 2, 2012, the Company and Anglo Platinum announced that the parties had concluded a term sheet comprising the first iteration of the Refinancing Plan which was carried out over two phases.

Phase One

On September 28, 2012, the Company announced that it, together with Anglo Platinum, had completed Phase One of the Refinancing Plan, whereby the Company consolidated its 2009 Senior Debt Facility, the OCSF and “A” Preference Share Facility, such that the OCSF and the “A” Preference Share Facility were repaid in full.

In Phase One of the Refinancing Plan, the 2009 Senior Debt Facility was amended to increase the total amount available under the facility, and this additional amount was utilized to repay the amounts owed to RPM under the OCSF (See ITEM  4. A.6.1. OCSF ) and to redeem the existing “A” Preference Share Facility (see ITEM 4. A.6.3.1. Cash component - “A” Preference Share Facility). These transactions resulted in all outstanding debt owing to RPM as at that date being consolidated into one single facility on terms and conditions agreed between the parties, including an interest rate adjustment, which lowered the Company’s cost of borrowing. A fair value adjustment was recorded on the 2009 Senior Debt Facility. Refer below for more detail.

Certain of the transactions completed as part of Phase One of the Refinancing Plan are “related party transactions” pursuant to Multilateral Instrument 61-101 – Protection of Minority Securityholders Interest in Special Transactions. Readers are referred to the Material Change report of the Company dated September 27, 2012, for more information regarding the related party aspects of Phase One, including details of exemptions from valuation and shareholder approval requirements relied on by Atlatsa.

When a transaction is with a shareholder at terms and conditions that would not be expected from a third party, it is clear that either the company or the shareholder obtained a benefit because of the shareholder relationship. This benefit is recognized directly in equity. In respect of loans with shareholders, the difference between the loan received and the amount recognized at fair value on initial recognition, is recognized as a fair value gain or loss directly in equity. In respect of loans with shareholders, the difference between the loan settled and the amount recognized at fair value on settlement date, is recognized as a fair value gain or loss directly in equity.

Phase Two

On March 27, 2013, the Company announced the execution of definitive agreements for Phase Two of the Refinancing Plan which included the disposal of certain mineral properties representing undeveloped estimated PGM resources to RPM and the

 

36


Table of Contents

recapitalization and refinancing of Atlatsa and the Bokoni Group, together with an undertaking to accelerate production growth at the Bokoni Mine. The first part of Phase Two was completed on December 13, 2013 and the remainder of the Phase Two transactions were completed on January 31, 2014.

Certain of the transactions completed as part of Phase Two of the Refinancing Plan are “related party transactions” pursuant to Multilateral Instrument 61-101 – Protection of Minority Securityholders Interest in Special Transactions. Readers are referred to the management information circular (as filed on SEDAR on May 31, 2013) of the Company dated May 28, 2013, for more information regarding the related party aspects of Phase Two, including details of formal valuations obtained by Atlatsa. Included in the information circular, are details of Minxcon (an independent valuator) as well as PSG (in relation to a fairness opinion over the Refinancing Plan). The following was noted in terms of the valuations of the mineral properties to be sold in Phase Two:

“Minxcon is of the opinion that, as of February 27, 2013, the fair market value of the assets of the Boikgantsho Project is estimated to be between $80.7 million (ZAR902 million) and $85.9 million (ZAR960 million). The Boikgantsho Asset Sale Agreement provides that Boikgantsho will sell and RPM will purchase the assets of the Boikgantsho Project for $85.0 million (ZAR950 million), which is within the range of the fair market values of the Boikgantsho Project as set out in the Boikgantsho Valuation”.

Management received disinterested Shareholder approval for Phase Two of the Refinancing Plan, on June 28, 2013.

As part of Phase Two of the Refinancing Plan, under the New Senior Facilities Agreement signed on March 27, 2013, Anglo Platinum agreed to make additional facilities available to the Company, after the 2009 Senior Debt had been fully utilized by the Company to finance its pro rata share of the Bokoni Mine going forward. The Company was not entitled to draw down amounts under the New Senior Facilities Agreement until, amongst other things, the conditions precedent to such drawdowns were met (these conditions precedent were met on December 12, 2013).

Due to this delay in closing the Refinancing Plan, and the fact that the Company required additional funding prior to the date the New Senior Facilities Agreement became available to the Company (i.e. December 13, 2013), the parties agreed to increase the amount available for draw down under the 2009 Senior Debt Facility by $19.3 million (ZAR215.7 million). An agreement effecting this increase was signed on May 28, 2013 (the “Amending Agreement”).

In addition to the facilities provided, RPM agreed to fund Bokoni with an advance on the Purchase of Concentrate revenue on the sale of concentrate made to RPM with an interest rate of JIBAR plus 1.41% per annum, from November 1, 2013 to December 31, 2015. This agreement is as a result of the facilities under the New Senior Facilities Agreement not being sufficient to meet the cash requirement of Bokoni Mine either because of the delay in finalizing the Refinancing Plan or after the New Senior Facilities Agreement has been fully utilized. See ITEM  4. A.6.8. Purchase of Concentrate Advance

The final conditions precedent for the completion of Phase Two of the Refinancing Plan was obtained on December 12, 2013.

On December 13, 2013; the following transactions forming part of Phase Two of the Refinancing Plan were completed:

 

    the sale and transfer of the Company’s interest in Boikgantsho and Eastern section of the Ga-Phasha to RPM for a net consideration of $152.1 million (ZAR1,700.0 million). For accounting purposes this sale gave rise to gains of $171.1 million(as at December 31, 2013) that is reported as “Other income” in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (also refer to note 30 in the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal 2015; shown as a comparative number in 2013);

 

    the purchase consideration payable for the sale of Boikgantsho was paid to the Company on December 13, 2013, excluding an amount of $2.6 million (ZAR29.0 million) in respect of Boikgantsho which is payable on the date of execution of the notarial deed of extension of the RPM Mining Right to include the Boikgantsho Prospecting Rights. The proceeds of $149.5 million (ZAR1,671 million) were used to reduce the outstanding debt to RPM;

 

    RPM subscribed for additional shares in Bokoni Holdco to the value of $173.5 million (ZAR1,939.4 million). Bokoni Holdco utilized these funds to repay the debt outstanding between Bokoni Holdco and RPM of $173.5 million (ZAR1,939.4 million);

 

    Plateau also subscribed for additional shares as part of the funding between Plateau and Bokoni Holdco, and as such Plateau’s interest in Bokoni Holdco has not been diluted. This transaction is eliminated for Group consolidation purposes;

 

   

The 2009 Senior Debt Facility was repaid in full (see ITEM  4. A.6.2. 2009 Senior Debt Facility ) and the New Senior Facilities Agreement between Plateau and RPM as signed on March 27, 2013 was made effective. The amount available under the New Senior Facilities Agreement is $205.8 million (ZAR2,300 million) of which $199.1 million

 

37


Table of Contents
 

(ZAR2,225.7 million), including interest was utilized by December 31, 2014, and fully utilized by March 31, 2014. See ITEM  4. A.6.6.New Senior Facilities Agreement ;

 

    Plateau also entered into the Working Capital Facility of $8.1 million (ZAR90.0 million) with RPM to fund Atlatsa’s corporate and administrative expenses through to the end of 2015 of which $2.7 million (ZAR30.0 million) was utilized at year-end 2015 (See ITEM  4. A.6.7. Working Capital Facility ); and

 

    the Concentrate Agreement (see ITEM  4. A.7.4. Sale of concentrate ) was extended until 2020.

During January 2014, Phase Two of the Refinancing Plan was finalized by completing the following:

 

    Pelawan SPV converted the SPV Preferred Shares held by RPM into SPV Ordinary Shares and converted the “B” Preference Shares held by Pelawan SPV in Plateau into Plateau Ordinary Shares. In addition, in accordance with the terms of the Plateau Ordinary Shares, Plateau issued Pelawan SPV a special dividend in cash of $21.6 million (ZAR241.7 million), which Pelawan SPV used to subscribe for additional Plateau Ordinary Shares.

 

    As per the Exchange Agreement, Atlatsa issued 227.4 million Common Shares to Pelawan SPV in exchange for the Plateau Ordinary Shares. Following this issuance, Pelawan SPV immediately bought back all SPV Ordinary Shares held by RPM and settled the buyback consideration by delivering to RPM 115.8 million Common Shares in the Company. On January 29, 2014, RPM sold these 115.8 million Common Shares in the Company to Atlatsa Holdings, held in trust by the Pelawan Trust in exchange for the Atlatsa Holdings Vendor Finance Loan. Atlatsa Holdings increased its shareholding in the Company to 61.85% (based on the Atlatsa Holdings’ shareholding of Common Shares as February 29, 2016);

 

    On January 29, 2014, Atlatsa Holdings, the Company’s majority shareholder; acquired the 115.8 million Common Shares in the Company from RPM on a vendor financed basis, which resulted in Atlatsa Holdings owing $41.4 million (ZAR463.2 million) to RPM, to be repaid in stages by December 31, 2020 (the “Atlatsa Holdings Vendor Finance Loan”);

 

    Pelawan SPV transferred the remaining 111.6 million Common Shares in the Company issued to Pelawan SPV pursuant to the Exchange Agreement to Atlatsa Holdings in trust for the Pelawan Trust. Such Common Shares are subject to a lock-in that prevents Pelawan SPV and Atlatsa Holdings from disposing of such Common Shares for so long as Atlatsa Holdings is required to maintain a minimum 51% shareholding in Atlatsa;

 

    Atlatsa Holdings provided security to RPM in relation to the Atlatsa Holdings Vendor Finance Loan by way of a pledge and cession of its entire shareholding in Atlatsa, which shares remain subject to a lock-in arrangement through to 2020. Should Atlatsa Holdings be unable to meet its minimum repayment commitments under the Atlatsa Holdings Vendor Finance Loan between 2018 to 2020, Atlatsa will have a discretionary right, with no obligation, to step in and remedy such obligation in order to protect its BEE shareholding status, subject to commercial terms being agreed upon between Atlatsa Holdings and Atlatsa for that purpose and receipt of the necessary regulatory and shareholder approvals; and

 

    RPM subscribed for 125 million Common Shares of the Company on January 31, 2014, for $67.1 million (ZAR750.0 million), which proceeds were used to repay a portion of the Company’s outstanding debt to RPM under the New Senior Facilities Agreement.

Fair Value adjustments on loans and borrowings:

The Company has recognized a fair value loss and AG8 adjustments of ($0.3 million) in its Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for Fiscal 2015, compared to a fair value loss and AG8 adjustments of ($2.1 million) for Fiscal 2014. The difference is due to the refinancing cash flow implications being moved out as a result of the delay in finalization of the Refinancing Plan during Fiscal 2013. In addition to this, post December 13, 2013, only the debt between Plateau and RPM was fair valued, as the 49% contribution by RPM to Bokoni Holdco was treated as a shareholders loan with the intention to capitalize these loans, which took place on March 31, 2014, therefore the 2015 fair value loss is at a minimum.

The Company has recognized a fair value loss and AG8 adjustments of $2.1 million in its Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for Fiscal 2014, compared to a fair value gain and AG8 adjustment of $48.0 million for Fiscal 2013. The non-controlling interest referred to in the audited Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity and in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, includes a fair value gain on fair valuing the outstanding debt between Bokoni Holdco and RPM of $127.8 million for Fiscal 2012, and a fair value loss of ($98.9 million) as a result of settling the debt between Bokoni Holdco and RPM, for Fiscal 2014.

As a result of the debt consolidation and associated interest rate adjustment, which took place on the completion of Phase One of the Refinancing Plan on September 28, 2012, the Company derecognized its historical debt and recognized the new

 

38


Table of Contents

consolidated 2009 Senior Debt Facility which required the debt to be classified at fair value which gave rise to fair value adjustments required to be recorded.

On December 13, 2013 the 2009 Senior Debt Facility was replaced by the New Senior Facilities Agreement between RPM and Plateau, which also gave rise to fair value adjustments as the terms have changed significantly from the 2009 Senior Debt Facility. The fair value adjustment results from the Company’s new cost of borrowing under the consolidated 2009 Senior Debt Facility and the New Senior Facilities Agreement being more favourable when compared to a market related cost of borrowing available to the Company.

The debt between Bokoni Holdco and RPM was settled on December 13, 2013, subsequent to the acquisition of additional shares by RPM in Bokoni Holdco. This resulted in a fair value loss as the contractual debt that was settled was greater than the fair value of the debt at the time.

For additional information on the Refinancing Plan refer to the press releases of Atlatsa dated February 2, 2012, March 15, 2012, March 30, 2012, May 3, 2012, June 15, 2012, July 26, 2012, September 7, 2012, September 27, 2012, October 2, 2012, October 22, 2012, December 3, 2012, January 21, 2013, March 27, 2013, March 28, 2013, April 5, 2013, July 2, 2013, August 20, 2013, August 29, 2013,October 7, 2013, October 8, 2013, October 31, 2013, December 12, 2013, December 18, 2013, January 16, 2014 and February 3, 2014 as well as the material change reports filed on February 13, 2012, September 27, 2012 and April 8, 2013 all of which are available on SEDAR www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

4. A.6. Debt Arrangements (applicable for the financial periods 2009 -2013)

The Company financed the Bokoni Transaction at the Plateau level through a combination of the 2009 Senior Debt Facility and an agreement with RPM whereby RPM provided Plateau with the operating cash flow shortfall facility (the “OCSF”) of up to a maximum of $67.1 million (ZAR750 million) (which increased to $98.4 million (ZAR1,100 million) on June 29, 2012) and access to RPM’s attributable share of the Bokoni Holdco cash flows (the “Standby Loan Facility”) which, with the Company’s portion, provided up to a maximum of 80% of all free cash flow generated from Bokoni to meet its repayment obligations in terms of the 2009 Senior Debt Facility.

The OCSF, the “A” Preference Share Facility and the 2009 Senior Debt Facility were consolidated on September 28, 2012 as part of Phase One of the Refinancing Plan (see ITEM 4. A.5. Refinance Plan (2012-2014) ). The 2009 Senior Debt Facility and the Standby Loan Facility were replaced by the New Senior Facilities Agreement on December 13, 2013.

4. A.6.1. OCSF (applicable for the financial periods 2009 -2012)

In order for Plateau to meet any required shareholder contributions in respect of operating or capital expenditure cash shortfalls at Bokoni during the initial three year ramp up phase at the Bokoni Mine, RPM provided Plateau with the OCSF which could be draw up to a maximum of $67.1 million (ZAR750 million) and was subject to certain annual draw down restrictions, in terms of quantum, during the first three years. On 29 June 2012, the OCSF facility was increased to $98.4 million (ZAR1,100 million)

The full outstanding amount under the OCSF as at September 28, 2012 was repaid and consolidated into the 2009 Senior Debt Facility, and the principal amount outstanding as at that date was $0. See ITEM  4. A.6.2. 2009 Senior Debt Facility . The OCSF is no longer available to the Company and is described herein for historical purposes only. See ITEM 4. A.5. Refinance Plan (2012-2014).

4. A.6.2. 2009 Senior Debt Facility (applicable for the financial periods 2009 -2013)

On July 1, 2009; Plateau entered into the 2009 Senior Debt Facility with Standard Charter Bank (“SCB”) for an amount of up to $67.1 million (ZAR750 million), including capitalized interest of up to a maximum of three years or $22.4 million (ZAR250 million).

The 2009 Senior Debt Facility was repayable in 12 semi-annual instalments, with the first payment due on January 31, 2013. Interest was calculated at a variable rate linked to the 3 month JIBAR plus applicable margin and mandatory cost. The 2009 Senior Debt Facility had a term of 108 months from July 1, 2009.

On December 11, 2009, 34% of the 2009 Senior Debt Facility was syndicated to First Rand Bank Limited, acting through its Rand Merchant Bank division.

SCB’s $44.7 million (ZAR500 million) and interest amounting to $12.8 million (ZAR142.8 million) at an interest rate of 11.345% was rolled up through April 28, 2011. Effective as of April 28, 2011, RPM assumed all of the rights and obligations of SCB and Rand Merchant Bank under the 2009 Senior Debt Facility.

The total amount of the interest payable on the notional amount of the 2009 Senior Debt Facility of $44.7 million (ZAR500 million) draw down on July 1, 2009 was hedged with effect from July 1, 2009 until July 31, 2012.

 

39


Table of Contents

On September 28, 2012, the full outstanding amount under the OCSF (ITEM 4. A.6.1. OCSF ) was repaid and consolidated into the 2009 Senior Debt Facility. See ITEM 4. A.5. Refinance Plan (2012-2014) for more information with respect to Phase One of the Refinancing Plan.

As part of Phase Two of the Refinancing Plan, Anglo Platinum made additional facilities available to the Company to finance its pro rata share of the Bokoni Mine operations going forward under the New Senior Facilities Agreement signed on March 27, 2013. The Company was not entitled to draw down amounts under the New Senior Facilities Agreement until, amongst other things, the conditions precedent to such drawdowns were met (these conditions precedent were met on December 12, 2013).

Due to the delay in closing of Phase Two of the Refinancing Plan, and the fact that the Company required funding prior to the New Senior Facilities Agreement becoming effective on December 13, 2013, the parties agreed to increase the amount available for draw down under the 2009 Senior Debt Facility by $19.3 million (ZAR215.7 million). The Amendment Agreement effecting this increase was signed on May 28, 2013.

A principal amount of $64.9 million (ZAR725.8 million) was drawn down on the 2009 Senior Debt Facility in the period from September 30, 2012 (the closing of Phase One of the Refinancing Plan) to December 13, 2013, (the date on which the New Senior Facilities Agreement became effective) which was added to the contractual amount outstanding under the 2009 Senior Debt Facility. In addition, during this period contractual interest of $7.3 million (ZAR81.6 million) was incurred resulting in a contractual balance of $195.8 million (ZAR2,188.8 million) being owed as at December 13, 2013 between Plateau and RPM.

On December 13, 2013 with the implementation of Phase Two of the Refinancing Plan, the 2009 Senior Debt Facility was converted to the New Senior Facilities Agreement and one of the implementation steps was to make a repayment under the 2009 Senior Debt Facility by drawing down on the New Senior Facilities Agreement, to give effect to the revised terms of the facility. On December 13, 2013, the 2009 Senior Debt Facility ceased to exist. RPM subscribed for additional shares in Bokoni Holdco to the value of $173.5 million (ZAR1,939.4 million). Bokoni Holdco utilized these funds to repay the debt outstanding between Bokoni Holdco and RPM of $173.5 million (ZAR1,939.4 million) on December 13, 2013.

The commencement of re-payments under the 2009 Senior Debt Facility was deferred by one year from January 31, 2013, to January 31, 2014. When the New Senior Facilities Agreement came into effect on December 13, 2013, the 2009 Senior Debt Facility was no longer available to the Company and is described herein for historical purposes only.

4. A.6.3. Vendor Finance Facility

On July 1, 2009, RPM provided a vendor finance facility to Plateau consisting of a cash component, the “A” Preference Share Facility of $107.4 million (ZAR1.2 billion) and a share settled component (the “Share-Settled Financing”) amounting to $98.4 million (ZAR1.1 billion). See ITEM 4. A.5. Refinance Plan (2012-2014) for details of the repayment of these facilities.

4. A.6.3.1. Cash component - “A” Preference Share Facility (applicable for the financial periods 2009 -2012)

As part of the acquisition of the Bokoni Transaction, RPM subscribed for cumulative redeemable preference shares in the capital of Plateau (the “Plateau Preferred “A” Shares”) for an aggregate sum of $107.4 million (ZAR1.2 billion) (the ““A” Preference Share Facility”). These shares were cumulative mandatory redeemable shares which attract a fixed annual cumulative dividend of 12% (fixed quarterly cumulative dividend 11.49%). Atlatsa was obligated to redeem the outstanding amount, including undeclared dividends which should have been declared within six years of issue (July 1, 2015), to the extent that Atlatsa was in the position to redeem such Plateau Preferred “A” Shares. Any Plateau Preferred “A” Shares not redeemed in six years (at July 1, 2015) would automatically roll over and be finally redeemed nine years after issue (at July 1, 2018).

During the three year period prior to the initial maturity date (between July 1, 2012 and July 1, 2015), Plateau was required to undertake a mandatory debt refinancing and use 100% of such external funding raised to settle the following amounts owing by Plateau to RPM at such time, in the following order: (i) any outstanding amounts owing to RPM in respect of the Standby Loan Facility; (ii) any outstanding amounts owing to RPM in respect of the OCSF and (iii) any amount owing to RPM in respect of the “A” Preference Share Facility. The required refinancing took place pursuant to Phase One of the Refinancing Plan (see ITEM 4. A.5. Refinance Plan (2012-2014) ) and the “A” Preference Share Facility was redeemed and repaid in full on September 28, 2012.

The “A” Preference Share Facility is no longer available to the Company and is described herein for historical purposes only.

See ITEM 4. A.5. Refinance Plan (2012-2014) for a discussion of the impact of the Refinancing Plan on this facility.

4. A.6.3.2. Share Settled Financing – The “B” preference shares (applicable for the financial periods 2009 -2014)

On July 1, 2009, RPM provided a vendor finance facility to Plateau consisting of a cash component, and a share settled component (the “Share-Settled Financing”) amounting to $98.4 million (ZAR1.1 billion).

 

40


Table of Contents

Pursuant to the Share Settled Financing, Atlatsa Holdings, the majority shareholder of Atlatsa, established a wholly owned subsidiary, Pelawan SPV, and transferred 56,691,303 Common Shares in the Company to the Pelawan SPV. RPM subscribed for convertible preferred shares in the capital of the Pelawan SPV (the “SPV Preferred Shares”) for an aggregate sum of $98.4 million (ZAR1.1 billion). The SPV Preferred Shares were convertible in one or more tranches into ordinary shares in the capital of the Pelawan SPV (“SPV Ordinary Shares”) immediately upon demand by RPM, upon the earlier of (i) the date of receipt by the Pelawan SPV of a conversion notice from RPM and (ii) July 1, 2018. Pelawan SPV received a conversion notice from RPM on January 7, 2014. Atlatsa Holdings encumbered its shareholding in the Pelawan SPV in favor of RPM as security for the obligations of the Pelawan SPV pursuant to the SPV Preferred Shares.

Pelawan SPV then subscribed for two different classes of convertible class B preferred shares (the ““B” Preference Shares”) in Plateau for $98.4 million (ZAR1.1 billion), each such class being convertible into ordinary shares in the capital of Plateau (“Plateau Ordinary Shares”) and entitling the holder of the Plateau Ordinary Shares to a special dividend in cash, which, upon receipt, would immediately be used to subscribe for additional Plateau Ordinary Shares. The “B” Preference Shares were zero coupon shares and carried no rights to preference dividends.

Pursuant to the conversion notice received on January 7, 2014, Pelawan SPV converted the SPV Preferred Shares held by RPM into SPV Ordinary Shares on January 14, 2014 and converted the “B” Preference Shares held by Pelawan SPV in Plateau into Plateau Ordinary Shares. In addition, in accordance with the terms of the Plateau Ordinary Shares, Plateau issued Pelawan SPV a special dividend in cash of $21.6 million (ZAR241.7 million), which Pelawan SPV used to subscribe for additional Plateau Ordinary Shares. (See ITEM 4. A.5. Refinance Plan (2012-2014) )

Pursuant to an agreement between Pelawan SPV and Atlatsa (the “Exchange Agreement”), upon Plateau issuing Plateau Ordinary Shares to Pelawan SPV, Atlatsa would take delivery of all such shares and, in consideration thereof, issue to Pelawan SPV such number of Common Shares that would have a value equal to the value of such Plateau Ordinary Shares. The total number of Common Shares issued on implementation of the Share-Settled Financing arrangement was 227.4 million Common Shares.

Following this issuance, Pelawan SPV immediately bought back all SPV Ordinary Shares held by RPM and settled the buyback consideration by delivering to RPM 115.8 million Common Shares in the Company. On January 29, 2014, RPM sold these 115.8 million Common Shares in the Company to Atlatsa Holdings, held in trust by the Pelawan Trust in exchange for the Atlatsa Holdings Vendor Finance Loan. Atlatsa Holdings increased its shareholding in the Company to 61.85% (based on the Atlatsa Holdings’ shareholding of Common Shares as February 29, 2016). See ITEM 4. A.7. Special Shareholder Arrangements.

On January 29, 2014, Atlatsa Holdings, the Company’s majority shareholder; acquired the 115.8 million Common Shares in the Company from RPM on a vendor financed basis, which resulted in Atlatsa Holdings owing $41.4 million (ZAR463.2 million) to RPM, to be repaid in stages by December 31, 2020 (the “Atlatsa Holdings Vendor Finance Loan”).

Pelawan SPV transferred the remaining 111.6 million Common Shares in the Company issued to Pelawan SPV pursuant to the Exchange Agreement to Atlatsa Holdings in trust for the Pelawan Trust. Such Common Shares are subject to a lock-in that prevents Pelawan SPV and Atlatsa Holdings from disposing of such Common Shares for so long as Atlatsa Holdings is required to maintain a minimum 51% shareholding in Atlatsa. See ITEM 4. A.7. Special Shareholder Arrangements .

Atlatsa Holdings provided security to RPM in relation to the Atlatsa Holdings Vendor Finance Loan by way of a pledge and cession of its entire shareholding in Atlatsa, which shares remain subject to a lock-in arrangement through to 2020. Should Atlatsa Holdings be unable to meet its minimum repayment commitments under the Atlatsa Holdings Vendor Finance Loan between 2018 to 2020, Atlatsa will have a discretionary right, with no obligation, to step in and remedy such obligation in order to protect its BEE shareholding status, subject to commercial terms being agreed upon between Atlatsa Holdings and Atlatsa for that purpose and receipt of the necessary regulatory and shareholder approvals. See ITEM  4. A.7.1. Ownership of Bokoni Holdco.

The Share Settled Financing is now complete and is described herein for historical purposes only.

4. A.6.4. Standby Loan facility (applicable for the financial periods 2009 -2013)

On July 1, 2009, Anglo Platinum has made available to Plateau the Standby Loan Facility of an amount equal to 29% of Bokoni cash flows, which Plateau may use to fund any cash flow shortfalls that may arise in Plateau funding any repayment obligations it may have under the 2009 Senior Debt Facility during its term. The Standby Loan Facility will bear interest at the prime rate of interest in South Africa (9.25% at December 31, 2015). As at December 13, 2013, with completion of the 2009 Senior Debt facility, the Standby Loan facility also came to a close.

 

41


Table of Contents

4. A.6.5.Security (applicable for the financial periods 2009 - current)

The 2009 Senior Debt Facility and now replaced by the New Senior Facilities Agreement is secured through various security instruments, guarantees and undertakings provided by Atlatsa against 51% of the cash flows generated by Bokoni, together with 51% of Bokoni’s asset base.

Atlatsa Holdings will provide security to RPM in relation to the Atlatsa Holdings Vendor Finance Loan by way of a pledge and cession of its entire shareholding in Atlatsa, which shares remain subject to a lock-in arrangement through to 2020. Should Atlatsa Holdings be unable to meet its minimum repayment commitments under the Atlatsa Holdings Vendor Finance Loan between 2018 to 2020, Atlatsa will have a discretionary right, with no obligation, to step in and remedy such obligation in order to protect its BEE shareholding status, subject to commercial terms being agreed between Atlatsa Holdings and Atlatsa for that purpose and receipt of the necessary regulatory and shareholder approvals. The Group’s debt is denominated in ZAR.

The following debt facilities were the result of the Refinancing Plan, which was concluded in 2014 (see ITEM 4. A.5. Refinance Plan (2012-2014)):

4. A.6.6.New Senior Facilities Agreement (applicable for the financial periods 2013 - current)

The total amount made available to Plateau on December 13, 2013, under the New Senior Facilities Agreement was $205.8 million (ZAR2,300.0 million). As at December 31, 2013, the balance outstanding between Plateau and RPM, was $198.8 million (ZAR2,225.7 million), including interest at year-end. Subsequently, Atlatsa used the proceeds of $74.8 million (ZAR750.0 million converted at transaction date: January 31, 2014) from RPM’s subscription for 125 million Common Shares in the Company on January 31, 2014, to reduce the amount outstanding between Plateau and RPM under the New Senior Facilities Agreement to $138.7 million (ZAR1,550.0 million); this becoming the amended maximum available under this facility.

In the event Plateau draws down on the facility available under the New Senior Facilities Agreement to fund its 51% contribution to Bokoni Holdco, RPM is obliged to meet its 49% contribution to Bokoni Holdco as a shareholder loan to Bokoni Holdco.

Pursuant to the March 27, 2013 shareholders agreement between Plateau, RPM and Bokoni Holdco (“Bokoni Holdco Shareholders Agreement”), the Board of Bokoni Holdco, which is controlled by Atlatsa, has the right to call for shareholder contributions, either by way of a shareholder loan or equity cash call. See ITEM  4. A.7.3. Funding.

RPM’s 49% contributions to Bokoni Holdco between December 13, 2013 and March 31, 2014 were treated as shareholder loans. The Board of Bokoni Holdco, as per the Bokoni Holdco Shareholders Agreement, treated these loans as shareholder’s loans. On March 31, 2014, the total of the shareholder loans was capitalized in exchange for additional ordinary shares in Bokoni Holdco. A decision was taken in Q2 2014, to also capitalize Bokoni Holdco’s loan of to Boikgantsho.

Capitalization of shareholders loans:

 

Description

   RPM’s 49% of
loan treated as
a shareholders
loan and then
capitalized as
per above
 

Drawdowns included in opening balance

   $ 3.3 million   

Drawdowns in January and March 2014

   $ 6.0 million   

Capitalized in Q1 2014 (subtotal)

   $ 9.3 million   

Bokoni Holdco’s loan to Boikgantsho and capitalized in Q2 2014

   $ 3.2 million   
  

 

 

 

Total capitalized during Q2 2014 (total for Fiscal 2014)

   $ 12.5 million
  

 

 

 

 

* Based on the exchange rate at December 31, 2014. Refer to note 20 in the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal 2014.

There are no shareholders loans as of December 31, 2015.

On December 9, 2015, the New Senior Facilities Agreement was amended and restated to increase the availability under the facility by $6.4 million (ZAR71.4 million) to make available funds to Plateau to repay its 51% pro-rata share of the $12.5 million (ZAR140.0 million) backlog of trade and other payables. As at the date of the issue of the Consolidated Financial

 

42


Table of Contents

Statements a condition precedent remains outstanding and it is anticipated will be met by Quarter 2 of 2016. On mutual agreement with RPM the repayment would take place once the condition precedent has been met.

Although the facility limit of the New Senior Facilities Agreement was fully drawn in Q1 2014, Anglo Platinum’s Board of Directors agreed to allow $14.3 million (ZAR160.0 million) in ‘to be accrued’ interest above the facility limit of $138.7 million (ZAR1,550 million) and the amendment increase of $6.4 million (ZAR71.4 million) (the Company’s pro-rata share as discussed above). This brings the total available facility to $159.4 million (ZAR1,781.4 million) . The total amount outstanding under the New Senior Facilities Agreement as of the date hereof was $159.0 million (ZAR1,658.0 million), inclusive of accrued interest.

The repayment terms of the New Senior Facilities Agreement include quarterly cash sweeps, when cash is available. Atlatsa is required to reduce the outstanding balance (including capitalized interest) under the New Senior Facilities Agreement to $89.5 million (ZAR1.0 billion) by December 31, 2018, $44.7 million (ZAR500.0 million) by December 31, 2019, and zero by December 31, 2020.

4. A.6.7. Working Capital Facility (applicable for the financial periods 2013 - current)

Prior to implementation of Phase Two of the Refinancing Plan and as an interim measure prior to the closing of the Refinancing Plan, RPM and Plateau agreed to a transaction cost loan agreement, as signed and implemented on May 28, 2013 (the “Transaction Cost Loan Agreement”), to make a $2.0 million (ZAR22.5 million) facility available to Plateau. The Transaction Cost Loan Agreement carried interest at the South African Prime Rate plus 5%. This facility was included in the increase cash of $21.6 million (ZAR215.7 million) pursuant to the Amending Agreement; which formed part of the 2009 Senior Debt Facility. See ITEM  4. A.6.6.New Senior Facilities Agreement .

On December 13, 2013, Plateau and RPM entered into a working capital facility whereby RPM agreed to provide a maximum of $2.7 million (ZAR30.0 million) to Plateau each year from 2013 to 2015, inclusive, up to an aggregate amount of $8.1 million (ZAR90.0 million), including capitalized interest, to fund Plateau’s corporate and administrative expenses through to 2015 (the “Working Capital Facility”).

On December 13, 2013, Plateau drew down on the Working Capital Facility and repaid the amount outstanding under the Transaction Cost Loan Agreement of $0.6 million (ZAR7.2 million) including interest. The Transaction Cost Loan Agreement is no longer in effect and is described herein for historical purposes only.

Pursuant to the terms of the Working Capital Facility, interest will be charged on the outstanding amounts of the Working Capital Facility at a rate of three-month JIBAR plus 4% per annum. The balance of the Working Capital Facility cannot exceed $8.1 million (ZAR90.0 million) at any time, including capitalized interest. Atlatsa is prohibited from paying any dividends until the Working Capital Facility is fully repaid. The Working Capital Facility is repayable in full by December 31, 2018.

Pursuant to amendments made to the Working Capital Facility (the “amended Working Capital Facility”) all conditions precedent were met on May 21, 2015 and an additional $2.6 million (ZAR29.0 million) became available in addition to the original $9.0 million (ZAR90.0 million).

During Q2 2015, $2.8 million (ZAR29.0 million) was advanced under the amended Working Capital Facility. RPM’s 49% contributions to Bokoni Holdco in June 2015 were treated as shareholder loans. On August 21, 2015, this shareholder loan of $2.8 million was capitalized. Refer to note 20 in the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, bringing the outstanding contractual balance to $9.1 million (ZAR101.6 million) as of the date hereof, inclusive of cumulative capitalized interest. Any shareholder loans bear no interest and have no repayment terms; however, at the end of December 31, 2015, there were no shareholders loans.

As discussed above under the New Senior Facilities Agreement, Plateau used the above drawdown on the amended Working Capital Facility, to fund its 51% contribution to Bokoni Holdco. RPM was obliged to meet its 49% contribution to Bokoni Holdco as a shareholder loan to Bokoni Holdco.

4. A.6.8. Purchase of Concentrate Advance (applicable for the financial periods 2013 - current)

In addition to the other facilities provided, RPM agreed to fund the Bokoni Mine, pursuant to the Advance on Concentrate Revenue Agreement (the “Advance”), with an advance on the sale of concentrate revenue made to RPM pursuant to the Concentrate Agreement, at an interest rate of three-month JIBAR plus 1.41% per annum, from November 1, 2013 to November 30, 2014.

The Advance provided that RPM may advance funds to Bokoni up to an amount equal to the lower of 90% of an advance on revenue for the preceding two months and $36.2 million (ZAR360.0 million), provided that the amount advanced does not exceed the actual cash requirements for that month. The terms of the Advance were re-negotiated in March 2014 to permit RPM to advance funds to Bokoni up to an amount equal to the lower of 95% of an advance on revenue for the preceding two months and $47.7 million (ZAR475.0 million), provided that the amount advanced does not exceed the actual cash requirements of

 

43


Table of Contents

Bokoni Mine for that month, and to extend the term of the Advance to March 31, 2015. In July 2014, the Advance was amended to extend the term of the agreement to December 31, 2015.

Drawdowns pursuant to the Advance of $74.5 million (ZAR832.2 million) were made against the concentrate revenue in Q4 2015, of which $48.6 million (ZAR542.8 million) was already recovered and $1.7 million (ZAR17.4 million) will be recovered as part of revenue received from RPM after the date hereof. RPM advanced additional funds (not supported by physical metal deliveries) on the purchase of concentrate agreement of $35.9 million (ZAR401.9 million) to secure short term funding until all conditions precedent on the Term Loan Facility provided by RPM, as discussed below (see ITEM 4. A.6.9. Term Loan Facility ). had been met and this facility could be utilized to fund the Bokoni operations.

4. A.6.9. Term Loan Facility (applicable for the financial period 2015 onwards)

On December 9, 2015, Plateau entered into a Term Loan Facility Agreement (the “Term Loan Facility”) with RPM, providing a $29.9 million (ZAR334.0 million) facility to enable Plateau to advance its 51% pro-rate share of the shareholder loans to Bokoni Holdco for the sole purpose of enabling Bokoni to fund operating expenses, working capital expenditure and capital expenditure costs in the event that these costs cannot be funded from Bokoni Mine cash flows. RPM will fund its 49% pro-rata share of cash calls made by Bokoni in accordance with the joint venture shareholders’ agreement between the parties.

The Term Loan Facility bears no interest and replaces the letter of support of November 10, 2014 received from RPM (see “Going Concern” in note 2 of the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal 2015.) If however, any amount which is due and payable in accordance with the Term Loan Facility is unpaid, the unpaid amount shall accrue interest at the prime rate plus 2%. The Term Loan Facility is repayable at the earlier of an event of default and December 31, 2018. There will be a mandatory repayment upon the occurrence of a change of control or a sale of all or substantially all the assets of Bokoni whether in a single transaction or a series of related transactions.

On March 8, 2016, the conditions precedent to utilization of the Facility were met, allowing for drawdowns to finance operational cash short falls and the repayment of the purchase of concentrate funding as previously discussed. For more detail on the Term Loan Facility, see “Going Concern” in note 2 of the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal 2015.

4. A.7. Special Shareholder Arrangements

The Holdco Shareholders Agreement, dated March 27, 2013, between Plateau and RPM governs the relationship between Plateau and RPM, as shareholders of Bokoni Holdco, and with respect to management of Bokoni Holdco and its subsidiaries, including Bokoni.

Pursuant to the terms of shared services agreements, Anglo Platinum provides certain services to the Bokoni Mine at a cost that is no greater than the costs charged to any other Anglo American plc group company for the same or similar services. The Company, through Plateau, provides certain management services to the Bokoni Mine pursuant to service agreements entered into with effect from July 1, 2009.

4. A.7.1. Ownership of Bokoni Holdco

Atlatsa has given certain undertakings to Anglo Platinum in relation to the maintenance of its status as an HDP controlled company pursuant to the Holdco Shareholders Agreement. During the Initial Period, Plateau is required to ensure that, among other things: (i) HDPs effectively own, through Plateau, its subsidiaries and its controlling shareholders (i.e. the Atlatsa Control Structure), at least 26% of the beneficial business ownership of Bokoni Holdco shall be HDPs, measured on a see-through basis; (ii) a majority of the directors of Bokoni Holdco are HDPs; and (iii) a majority of the directors of Atlatsa Holdings Investments Pty Limited (“Atlatsa Holdings”) are HDPs.

At any time during the term of the Holdco Shareholders Agreement, if a change in control of Bokoni Holdco occurs, Plateau is required to “remedy” the change by either restoring the status quo or procuring that the change is superseded by a further transaction that results in the acquisition of control of Atlatsa Holdings by HDPs who were beneficial owners of Atlatsa Holdings as at the date of signature of the Holdco Shareholders Agreement, or involves such shareholders expropriating the defaulting shareholder’s interest (with no attendant change in control). If Plateau fails to do so within the period specified in the Holdco Shareholders Agreement, RPM will be entitled to compel the purchase by Plateau of RPM’s interests in Bokoni Holdco for fair market value.

Through the Pelawan Trust shareholding combined as Atlatsa Holdings (see ITEM  4. A.6.3.2. Share Settled Financing – The “B” preference shares), Atlatsa currently has a BEE shareholding of 61.85% (based on the Atlatsa Holdings’ shareholding of Common Shares as February 29, 2016) and, pursuant to the Atlatsa Shareholders Agreement, the shareholding of the Pelawan Trust (or any other HDP, as defined in the Pelawan Agreements, participating in the trust) in Atlatsa cannot be diluted to below the shareholding threshold of 51% required under South African law.

 

44


Table of Contents

4. A.7.2. Bokoni Holdco Board of Directors

Plateau is entitled to nominate the majority of the directors of Bokoni Holdco and Bokoni, and has undertaken that the majority of such nominees will be HDPs. Atlatsa has given certain undertakings to Anglo Platinum in relation to the maintenance of its status as an HDP controlled group, pursuant to the Holdco Shareholders Agreement.

4. A.7.3. Funding

Pursuant to the Holdco Shareholders Agreement, the board of directors of Bokoni Holdco, which is controlled by Atlatsa, has the right to call for shareholder contributions, either by way of a shareholder loan or equity. Should a shareholder default on an equity cash call, the other shareholder may increase its equity interest in Bokoni Holdco by funding the entire cash call, provided that, until the expiry of a period from the closing date of the Bokoni Transaction until the earlier of (i) the date on which the BEE credits attributable to the Anglo Platinum group and/or arising as a result of the Bokoni Transaction become legally secure, and (ii) the date on which Plateau has repaid its Debt to RPM pursuant to the New Senior Debt Facility in full (the “Initial Period”), Plateau’s shareholding in Bokoni Holdco cannot be diluted for default in respect of equity contributions.

4. A.7.4. Sale of concentrate

Atlatsa is pursuing its mine-to-market strategy through a sale of concentrate agreement entered into between Bokoni Mine and RPM on June 26, 2009 (the “Concentrate Agreement”), amended on March 27, 2013, in respect of concentrate produced at Bokoni Mine. The Concentrate Agreement has an extended term until July 1, 2020. The Holdco Shareholders Agreement also governs the initial sale of concentrate from the Ga-Phasha Project upon commencement of production.

This metal-in-concentrate contains various payable metals, the most material of which are precious metals, being platinum, palladium, rhodium and gold, as well as base metals, containing copper and nickel. On delivery of the Bokoni Mine metal-in-concentrate to Anglo Platinum, metal assays are performed in order to assess metal content and Anglo Platinum then pays Atlatsa for such metal-in-concentrate based on a formula relating to spot metal pricing, less smelting and refining charges, as well as penalties (if applicable).

Revenue from the sale of concentrate, for Fiscal 2015 was $205.7 million (ZAR2,046.7 million) compared to Fiscal 2014 of $237.4 million (ZAR2,329.6 million). The sale of concentrate was Atlatsa’s sole revenue stream in Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014.

In addition, Atlatsa, through Ga-Phasha, entered into a limited off-take agreement with Anglo Platinum in respect of concentrate produced from the Ga-Phasha Project. This off-take agreement has an initial term of ten years and is renewable, at Atlatsa’s election, for a further period of ten years. Pursuant to the Ga-Phasha Project off-take provisions in the Holdco Shareholders Agreement (the “Ga-Phasha off-take agreement”), should Atlatsa elect to extend the Ga-Phasha off-take agreement with Anglo Platinum beyond the initial term, then Atlatsa may exercise options to acquire an ownership interest in Anglo Platinum’s Polokwane smelter complex (the “smelter options”). The first smelter option entitles Atlatsa to acquire an ownership interest in the Polokwane smelter complex equal to the percentage ratio that the concentrate feed from the Ga-Phasha properties bears to the design capacity of the Polokwane smelter complex, for a purchase consideration of ZAR1.00, plus any restructuring costs that may be required to facilitate this acquisition. The option is exercisable within 30 days after the commencement of the second ten year period of the Ga-Phasha off-take agreement. The second smelter option entitles Atlatsa to acquire an additional ownership interest in the Polokwane smelter equal to the percentage ratio that the attributable concentrate feed produced by the whole of the Atlatsa group, other than from the Ga-Phasha properties, bears to the design capacity of the Polokwane smelter, for a purchase consideration equal to the equivalent percentage of the replacement cost of the smelter, less pro-rated wear and tear. This option is exercisable within the first five years of the second ten year period of the Ga-Phasha off-take agreement. Polokwane smelter design capacity is to treat approximately 1.6 million platinum ounces per year.

4. A.7.5. Environmental Rehabilitation Trust

The rehabilitation trust provision in respect of the Bokoni Mine was transferred from the Anglo Platinum fund to the Bokoni Environmental Rehabilitation Trust. Anglo Platinum provided the trust guarantees in respect of the above mentioned trust until July 1, 2010. Subsequent to this, management considered alternative insurance products. Anglo Platinum offered to continue the guarantee at favourable terms and management accepted their proposal. The current guarantee is still in place and logged with the DMR. In connection with the Bokoni Transaction, the Company also entered into the Bokoni Platinum Mine ESOP Trust and the Atlatsa Community Participation Trust (see ITEM  4. A.7.5. Share Ownership Trusts for further information regarding the Bokoni Platinum Mine ESOP Trust and the Atlatsa Community Participation Trust).

4. A.7.5. Share Ownership Trusts

The purpose of the Bokoni Platinum Mine ESOP Trust and the Atlatsa Community Participation Trust (the “Share Ownership Trusts”) is to provide the employees of Bokoni Mine and the members of the communities affected by Atlatsa’s operations, respectively, with the opportunity to participate in, and benefit from, Atlatsa’s success.

 

45


Table of Contents

On July 1, 2009, Anglo Platinum donated $9.3 million (ZAR103.8 million) to the Atlatsa Community Participation Trust, of which $6.6 million (ZAR73.6 million) was used to subscribe for 9,799,505 common shares of Atlatsa. The balance of Anglo Platinum’s contribution will be used to assist the communities impacted by Bokoni Mine over the forthcoming periods. We have considered the purpose and objective of the trust, and it is the Group’s view that the control, decision making power and majority of the risks and benefits does not reside with Atlatsa nor does it constitute joint control and as such the Company does not consolidate the trust.

Anglo Platinum contributed an amount of $4.1 million (ZAR45.6 million) to the Bokoni Platinum Mine ESOP Trust (“ESOP Trust”) to facilitate its establishment, and approximately $3.0 million (ZAR33.8 million) of this amount was utilized by the ESOP Trust to subscribe for 4,497,062 common shares of Atlatsa. The ESOP Trust is consolidated by Atlatsa.

The Share Ownership Trusts subscribed for the common shares at a subscription price equal to $1.11, being the closing price of the common shares on the TSX-V on June 12, 2009, the day prior to the announcement of the revised Bokoni Transaction terms. As a result of the subscription by the Share Ownership Trusts, Atlatsa received proceeds of approximately $9.7 million (ZAR108 million). The Share Ownership Trusts hold the common shares along with other investments for the purpose of making distributions to their beneficiaries in accordance with their governing trust deeds.

4. B. Business Overview

4. B. 1. Atlatsa’s Principal Activities

Atlatsa is engaged in mining, exploration and development of mineral deposits located in the BIC, South Africa. South Africa has more than 80% of the world’s platinum reserves, and is the world’s largest producer of PGM. These vast resources occur together with the world’s largest reserves of chromium and vanadium ore in the unique BIC geological formation. South Africa’s PGM output is derived almost exclusively from the BIC, with only about 0.1% coming from the gold deposits of the Witwatersrand and Free State, and the Phalaborwa copper deposit.

The major market for PGMs remains the automotive sector where varied combinations of platinum, palladium and rhodium are used in autocatalytic converters which reduce the effects of harmful emissions generated by automobiles.

Despite certain signs of economic recovery in European economies, platinum demand for autocatalytic converter usage in this key diesel engine dominated sector remains weak, when compared to peak demand levels in 2007. The subdued nature of European car sales during 2015 dims the outlook even further in the short term. The current economic turmoil in Europe is having a negative impact on the outlook for platinum prices. The introduction of Euro VI emission control standards in European economies is expected to increase the demand in this sector in the medium term.

There continues to be some encouraging signs for improved palladium demand growth as manufacturing recoveries in the gasoline dominated United States and Chinese economies’ automobile sectors continue to show strong performance, with recent research estimates from IHS Automotive predicting an increase in global vehicle production from 85 million to 106 million units by 2021, with China accounting for 50% of such growth. Recent policy and legislative initiatives in China, aimed at improving air quality and the introduction of hydrogen fuel cell powered motor vehicles by major motor manufacturers, are anticipated to increase demand in the PGM sector in the medium term. Atlatsa derives its revenues from PGM production through the sale of metal-in-concentrate produced at the Bokoni Mine to RPM in terms of a dedicated concentrate sale agreement (see ITEM  4. A.7.4. Sale of concentrate ). The Bokoni Mine produces a metal-in-concentrate, all of which is sold to RPM pursuant to the Concentrate Agreement. Underground mining operations in South Africa are labour intensive with 60% of cash operational expenditure at the Bokoni Mine applied to labour. The Bokoni Mine has approximately 3,500 employees and approximately 2,100 contractors. The mine employees are represented by three labour unions and wage negotiations are normally held every two years with a one to two year wage accord being agreed subsequent to such negotiations. A two year wage accord was signed on August 13, 2014, with the recognized labour unions at Bokoni that will be reviewed in 2016.

The Company believes that its relative competitiveness within the PGM sector remains poised to improve. The Company holds a relative advantage at its operations as its average reserve grade of 4.95 grams per tonne (“g/t”) (PGM) is greater than the South African PGM grade average of 3.5 g/t. It also holds an advantage in respect of mining depth, as the Company mines at an average mining depth of approximately 300 metres below surface, while many other operations in South Africa are operating at 1,000 metres below depth.

Information on mineral rights and prospecting and mining permits is provided in ITEM 4. D. Property, Plant and Equipment.

4. B.1.1. Mining and Exploration in South Africa

The South African mining sector has undergone a series of significant legislative changes in the past decade.

 

46


Table of Contents

Atlatsa has been advised by the DMR that the Bokoni Group has received conversion of all of its mining rights, as well as its prospecting rights into new order rights. A “new order” mining right is a limited real right that may be enforced against third parties and once granted the South African government has a limited power to interfere in the right. Failure to respect to such a right could give rise to criminal liability, a civil claim for damages or an administrative justice action.

4. B.2. Atlatsa’s Business Strategy

The Company’s business strategy going forward is to optimize its business plan for the development of the Bokoni Mine on a cost effective basis. There can be no assurance that the Company will successfully execute its business strategy.

4. B.2.1. Operating Plan

Due to the announcement of the Restructure Plan at Bokoni Mine, the operating plan has been amended accordingly. See ITEM 4. A.4. Bokoni Restructure Plan .

See ITEM 4. D.10. Bokoni Mine Operations , for the history of Bokoni Mine.

4. B.3. Service agreements

The Company concluded a number of agreements with respect to services at the Bokoni Mine with RPM, on March 27, 2008. These agreements were amended on May 13, 2009 and included a limited off-take agreement whereby the Bokoni Mine sells the concentrate produced at the mine to RPM at market related prices.

Pursuant to the terms of various shared services agreements, the Anglo American plc group of companies provides certain operational services to Bokoni at a cost that is no greater than the costs charged to any other Anglo American plc group for the same or similar services. Information on mineral rights and prospecting and mining permits is provided in ITEM 4. D. Property, Plant and Equipment .

 

47


Table of Contents

4.C Organizational Structure

Below is a list of the Company’s subsidiaries.

 

Company   Country of
Incorporation
  2015     2014  

N1C Resources Incorporation

  Cayman Islands     100     100

N2C Resources Incorporation *

  Cayman Islands     100     100

Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited *

  South Africa     100     100

Bokoni Holdings Proprietary Limited *

  South Africa     51     51

Bokoni Mine Proprietary Limited *

  South Africa     51     51

Boikgantsho Proprietary Limited *#

  South Africa     51     51

Kwanda Proprietary Limited *

  South Africa     51     51

Ga-Phasha Proprietary Limited * #

  South Africa     51     51

Lebowa Platinum Mine Limited * #

  South Africa     51     51

The following are the structured entities in the group:

     

Bokoni Platinum Mine ESOP Trust **

  South Africa    
 
Consolidated
structured entity
  
  
   
 
Consolidated
structured entity
  
  

Bokoni Rehabilitation Trust ***

  South Africa    
 
Consolidated
structured entity
  
  
   
 
Consolidated
structured entity
  
  

Bokoni Platinum Mine Community Trust ****

  South Africa    
 
Unconsolidated
structured entity
  
  
   
 
Unconsolidated
structured entity
  
  

 

*

   -    Indirectly held

#

   -    These entities are dormant

**

   -    The Atlatsa group provided the funding through Bokoni Mine to construct the trust and purchase shares in Atlatsa, but is not required to provide any further financial support to this entity. The purpose of the Trust is to facilitate a share-based payment arrangement on behalf of the group. Atlatsa has the right to appoint one trustee, who has the right to reject any decision made by the other trustees. Atlatsa therefore has power of the trust.

***

   -    Atlatsa Group has power over the trust, as the sole trustee is a director of Atlatsa. All the cash resources kept by the trust is on behalf of Atlatsa, to be later utilized against any rehabilitation and decommissioning incurred.

****

   -    As per the requirements of IFRS 10, we have considered the purpose and objective of the trust, and the Group has concluded that the power over the investee, exposure or rights to variable returns and the ability to use its power over the investee to affect the amount of the investor’s return does not reside with Atlatsa. This is due to Atlatsa having the right to appoint one trustee of the trust, but do not have the deciding vote, Atlatsa has no interest in/or power over the operations of the trust. The Atlatsa group is also not required to provide any financial support to the trust.

The Company adopted IFRS 11, in prior periods. The adoption had no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

48


Table of Contents

4. D. Property, Plant and Equipment

Atlatsa holds interests in properties located in the Republic of South Africa in a geological province known as the Bushveld Complex, as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Location of the Bokoni Mine and Kwanda Properties

 

LOGO

4. D. 1. Regional Geology

The Bushveld Complex was formed when a large igneous body was emplaced in the earth’s crust. As the magma slowly cooled, silicate, sulphide, oxide and other minerals crystallized, forming texturally and mineralogically distinctive layers. During this process PGM, nickel and copper (usually occurring with, or as, sulphide minerals) became sufficiently enriched to form mineralized horizons. As a result, the BIC plays host to layered PGM deposits, usually with significant nickel and copper contents.

The BIC is situated in the northern half of South Africa and exists as an ellipse-shaped body consisting of five lobes. The BIC is the world’s largest known ultramafic igneous intrusion that extends approximately 450 km east to west and approximately 250 km north to south and forms parts of Limpopo, North-West Province, Gauteng Province and the Mpumalanga Province. It is estimated to have been formed approximately 2,000 million years ago (Ma). The BIC is host to PGM mineralisation in addition to chrome, vanadium, nickel and copper.

The five lobes are referred to as the Western, Eastern, Northern (includes both the Potgietersrus and Villa Nora compartments), South-Eastern, and Far-Western areas. The latter occurs as a limb-like extension to the west of the BIC and mainly comprises rocks of the Marginal and Lower zones, with some Critical and Main zone development. The South-Eastern BIC is completely covered by sedimentary successions of the Karoo Supergroup, while the remaining four lobes are variably exposed with some areas under extensive soil cover.

Many of the layers within the Complex, including the economically important horizons, are continuous over tens of kilometres. However, the uniformity of the Merensky and UG2 horizons is disrupted in places by small circular depressions known as potholes.

In the Western and Eastern Bushveld Complex, PGM mineralization is currently extracted from two main horizons within the layered sequence of intrusive rocks: the Merensky Reef and the UG2 chromitite (a layer consisting largely of the mineral chromite). The UG2 layer lies below and essentially sub-parallel to the Merensky Reef but the two units are separated by 15 to 400 m of intervening layered intrusive rocks. The Merensky Reef is platinum rich relative to the UG2, where platinum and

 

49


Table of Contents

palladium occur in more or less equal proportions. The UG2 typically contains significantly more rhodium than the Merensky Reef (i.e. 10% or more of total PGM in places). The Platreef occurs on the Northern Limb of the Complex. It is 100 to 250 m thick. The Platreef is mineralogically similar to the Merensky Reef but its platinum palladium ratios, at ~1:1, are more like those in the UG2 horizon.

The Merensky and UG2 are products of primary magmatic mineralization within the BIC.

Figure 2. Regional geological setting – Bushveld Igneous Complex

 

LOGO

4. D. 2. Local Geology

The Bokoni Mine is located in the Sekhukhuneland District of the Limpopo Province of South Africa, approximately 80 km southeast of Polokwane, the provincial capital city, and approximately 330 km northeast of the city of Johannesburg. The area is serviced by a tarred road between Polokwane and Burgersfort. There is direct access along a service road from the Bokoni Mine to the main tarred road.

The Bokoni Mine is an operating mine located on the North-Eastern Limb of the BIC. The platiniferous horizons of economic significance occur within the Merensky and the UG2 horizons. PGM mineralization is specifically located within the Merensky horizon and the UG2 horizon, which forms part of the Upper Critical zone of the Rustenburg Layered Suite. The mining operations consists of a vertical shaft and three decline shaft systems to access underground mine development on the Merensky and UG2 Reef horizons as well as an opencast operation on the Merensky Reef.

The mining area is located within the farms, Zeekoegat, Middelpunt, Umkoanestad, Brakfontein and Klipfontein. The north-eastern portion of the mining area is located below a range of pyroxenite hills and the south-western portion is below the valley floor and is overlain by black turf.

Both horizons sub crop and in some instances outcrop in the project area along a 16.5 km strike length. The BIC layering dips from northeast to southwest at approximately 25º in the north-western areas (Zeekoegat), and gradually decreases to approximately 18º in the south-eastern area (Brakfontein). The general structural geology is characterized by northeast and east trending dykes and faults with associated conjugated joint sets.

 

50


Table of Contents

The Merensky is a feldspathic pyroxenite reef horizon and is stratigraphically situated 350 m above the UG2 and is near the top of the Upper Critical Zone. The Merensky is located below the three to six meter thick Merensky Pyroxenite layer and above the Merensky Norite layers. Two thin chromite stringers are discontinuously developed with the upper stringer positioned 20 cm to 25 cm from the Merensky Pyroxenite hanging-wall contact, and the lower stringer located on or just above the Merensky Pyroxenite’s basal contact. In the absence of a consistently developed chromite stringer, the upper contact of the Merensky Pyroxenite layer assists to define the top position of the Merensky horizon and is a guide for sampling purposes and on-reef mining. The Merensky hanging wall stratigraphic sequence is typified by medium to coarse grained feldspathic lithologies, ranging in composition from mela-norites to anorthosites. The Merensky footwall stratigraphic sequence has a sharp footwall contact, usually marked by the lower chromite stringer. While the top contact tends to be planar, the basal contact is undulating as a result of thermo-chemical erosion of the more mafic Merensky lithologies with their underlying felsic lithologies. This contact is often associated with a thin anorthosite layer (approximately 3 cm thick) that probably formed as a secondary reaction product of thermal erosion.

The UG2 is stratigraphically situated approximately 350 m below the Merensky and is separated by a series of well layered sequences. The UG2 is comprised mainly of this well-defined chromitite layer together with minor hanging wall and or footwall constituents. The average width of the UG2 is 70 cm. It is overlain by a medium-grained poikilitic feldspathic pyroxenite that averages 9.85 m in width, and hosts a variable number (generally up to four) of very thin chromitite layers. The position of these stringers is important to the mining of the UG2. The UG2 is underlain by a pegmatoidal feldspathic pyroxenite layer of approximately 0.75 m in width which is commonly host to disseminated chromite and some base metal sulphide occurrence within close proximity to the UG2. The UG2 elevation isopachs indicate a relatively undisturbed tabular and gently dipping layer. UG2 widths generally increase to the west from an average of 67 cm on Umkoanestad to 74 cm on Zeekoegat. There is no evidence of severe undulations to this layer that would adversely affect the planned mining method. Severe undulations of the UG2 are known to hamper mining by increasing dilution and off-reef mining.

Potholes are magmatic disturbances of the reef plane that are generally deep eroded depressions that have serious structural implications in respect of reef continuity. Merensky potholes, including those at the Bokoni Mine, have been well documented. Current indications are that potholes account for approximately 16% of the estimated total geological loss of 20%.

As with the Merensky, the UG2 is known to be affected by potholes. UG2 potholes typically have a “soup-bowl” profile. The characteristics of normal UG2 are not preserved in the Bokoni Mine potholes and the succession often occurs as a variably thickened feldspathic pyroxenite package, containing disrupted and discontinuous chromitite layers. As a result, grades within potholes are highly erratic and, invariably, sub-economic. UG2 potholes at the Bokoni Mine are commonly destructive and are not economically mineable. Geological pothole losses for the UG2 are estimated at 9% of the estimated total geological loss of 15% for the Bokoni Mine UG2.

The weathered overburden (soil and calcrete) depth across the Bokoni Mine is highly variable ranging from no overburden in the rocky outcrops and hill areas, to in excess of 50 m in the valley areas. The average overburden depths below surface are Zeekoegat 10 m, Middelpunt 22 m, Umkoanestad (valley) 30 m, Umkoanestad (mountain) 2 m and Brakfontein 40 m. The depth of oxidation may be reasonably estimated by adding 25 m to the overburden depth. A mineralogical study by Paetz & Reinecke (Dec 2002) has confirmed that the depth of oxidation in the vicinity of the Vertical Shaft is approximately 40 m.

The geological structure at the Bokoni Mine is not complicated with faulting. According to existing workings, minor faulting is expected to occur, and would consist of dextral and sinistral strike-slip faults, normal and reverse dip-slip faults and faults with more complex combinations of these components. Displacements are expected to be small, at generally £ 1 m. Major conjugate joint set orientations were measured from strong macro-lineament features evident from an aeromagnetic survey image and land satellite imagery which provided orientations in the order of 99° and 159°. Joint sets may result in poor ground conditions for mining but are not considered a geological loss.

An airborne aeromagnetic survey has successfully identified three to four swarms of northeast striking dolerite dykes. Post-mineralization dyke occurrences are noted on the Zeekoegat, Middelpunt and Umkoanestad farms. Current underground workings at Umkoanestad have intersected dykes up to 10 m wide. No serious problems were encountered during mining through these features, and no significant displacements were noted to be associated with them. The estimated geological loss associated with dykes across the property is 4%. The aeromagnetic response to these features exaggerates the actual width dimension. Not all dykes have magnetic responses and a few (very minor proportion) east-west orientated dykes are known to have no magnetic response.

The BIC stratigraphy is sometimes affected by randomly occurring, late-stage replacement pegmatite bodies. These pegmatite bodies have a range of compositions from highly ultramafic to felsic. The Bokoni Mine is no exception to the occurrence of these geological features, but is noted to have minimal evidence for the more mafic replacement pegmatites. Geological losses are estimated at less than 3% for replacement pegmatites.

 

51


Table of Contents

4. D.3. Access, Climate and Topography

The Bokoni Mine is located on an undulating plain between a range of hills in the north and a range of low mountains in the south. The plain is bisected by the Rapholo River, a major river in the area, which joins the Olifants River further downstream.

The average altitude of the plain is 800 meters above mean sea-level (“mamsl”) and the average altitude of the adjacent mountains is 1,600 mamsl. The plain, hills and mountains are sparsely vegetated with grasses, shrubs and occasional small trees with stunted growth. The vegetation is a result of both the arid climate and over-grazing by cattle and sheep.

There is some subsistence agriculture in the adjacent areas which is limited to small family farmed maize fields. There are notable expanses of bare soil on the surrounding properties and erosion is evident along water-courses in the area.

The Bokoni Mine is accessed from the R35 provincial all-weather road between Polokwane, the capital of Limpopo Province and Burgersfort, a town to the south-east in the neighboring province of Mpumalanga. The nearest railway stations are at Polokwane and Steelpoort 80 km and 100 km away, respectively. However, rail is not the preferred means of transport and all stores and equipment are delivered by road-truck to the Bokoni Mine.

The nearest commercial (domestic) airport is at Polokwane but the Bokoni Mine has a private heliport which is available for emergency evacuation if required.

The nearest large town is Polokwane, which is a modern and developing town providing housing, schooling, health care, shopping, commercial and government administrative facilities.

Many of the Bokoni Mine employees reside in Polokwane in company-owned or privately-owned suburban housing and commute to the Bokoni Mine by company bus or by private vehicle. The remaining employees are housed in a mine residential ‘village’ at the Bokoni Mine, while some staff reside in local private dwellings in the surrounding rural area.

The Sekhukhuneland District of the Limpopo Province has a typical arid, temperate Southern African climate. In the summer (September/October to March/April) day-time temperatures can reach the mid to high 30°C cooling to just below 20°C overnight. Rainfall occurs between November and March and annually can be between 300 millimeters (“mm”) and 500 mm.

Winter temperatures can be below 10°C overnight but warming to the mid-20s in the daytime. Winter is characterized by clear skies and summer by clear skies with isolated clouds. In both cases the vast majority (70% or greater) of days can be classified as ‘sunny’. Extreme weather conditions occur only a few times a year and can include mist, high wind with dust, thunderstorms and occasional hail. The mine operates twelve months per year and is not affected by climate and weather.

4. D. 4. Exploration

The geological exploration and evaluation process involves reconnaissance, planning, diamond drilling, core logging and sampling, trenching and sampling, soil sampling, aeromagnetics, ground magnetics, mapping, processing, interpreting and modelling.

The Bokoni Mine has been the focus of various exploration activities since 1964, with six phases of exploration having been carried out, all involving diamond drilling. Activities have centered on the Merensky, and only since 1999 has considerable focus been directed at the UG2.

The UG2 has limited exposure along the hills located along the northern boundary of the Bokoni Mine. Where the outcrop exists on the Umkoanestad and Wintersveld farms, it has been mapped. A number of dolerite dykes outcrop in these hills and have also been mapped. During 2002, a trenching program was conducted along the western UG2 outcrop areas on the Zeekoegat farm. Twenty-six trenches were excavated across this property, resulting in an accurately mapped UG2 sub crop position.

Routine underground exploration is conducted by means of mapping and diamond drilling. This serves to enhance the detail of geological information as the mine is developed.

Limited surface exploration was performed during 2012 in order to investigate opencast potential on the Klipfontein and Zeegoegat mineral properties. The explorations consisted of limited surface diamond core drilling and trench sampling.

No significant exploration activity occurred at Bokoni Mine in 2015.

 

52


Table of Contents

4. D. 5. Mineralization

4. D. 5.1. Merensky mineralization

At the Bokoni Mine the mineralisation within the Merensky occurs at both the upper and lower chromitite stringers. Most of the PGMs are associated with the upper chromite stringer and often extend over wider intervals to below the chromite stringer. Mineralisation associated with the lower chromite stringer at the base of the Merensky is generally over a very narrow interval and is sometimes absent. High PGM grades are often associated with the lower chromite stringer, but due to its greater separation from the upper stringer, it was not included in the Mineral Resource estimates. The Merensky has visible base metal sulphides (commonly pyrite and pyrrhotite) and, as a result, may have viable concentrations of copper and nickel.

PGMs are commonly associated with base metal sulphides and are associated with the silicate and chromite minerals. The relative proportions of PGM content for the Merensky are colloquially known as the ‘prill split’. Prill splits are determined as part of the Mineral Resource estimation process. At the Bokoni Mine, the Merensky PGM prill split is Pt 61%, Pd 29%, Rh 4% and Au 6%.

4. D. 5.2. UG2 mineralization

The UG2 mineralisation is comprised mainly of PGM accumulations that are hosted within the chromitite layers and have variable occurrences in the immediate footwall rocks, but very little in the hanging wall rocks. A 95 cm resource cut in most instances allows for the complete extraction of the mineral content. In the case of the presence of internal lenses (bifurcation) of pyroxenite, anorthosite or norite, the resource cut width may have to be increased to ensure that the UG2 is completely extracted.

The PGM mineralization occurs in solid solution with sulphides, sulpharsenides, arsenides, bismuthides, tellurides, bismuthotellurides and alloys. PGM-sulphides, tellurides, and alloys are the main constituents of mineralization in the UG2. The PGM prill split for the UG2 is broadly Pt 42%, Pd 46%, Rh 9%, and Au 2%.

4. D. 6. Drilling

At the Bokoni Mine, after reconnaissance and planning, borehole drilling sites are identified using GPS technology and then drilled by a reputable South African contract drilling company. All diamond drilling of recent years has ensured intersections for both the Merensky and UG2 are drilled. The Merensky and UG2 are separated by some 350m of intermediate stratigraphy.

Surface drill holes are distributed across the Bokoni Mine mining license area, with a closer drill grid spacing across the Brakfontein property. This is due to the targeting of the Brakfontein Merensky project and its associated study level requirements for obtaining higher confidence levels. The deeper areas have appropriately increased the drill grid spacing and are confirming the presence of the Merensky horizon.

Underground drilling is conducted ahead of the mining face to determine continuity of the reef, intersect gasses and water ahead of the mining face and to identify geological structures that may impact on mining.

4. D. 7. Sampling and Analysis

4. D. 7.1. Core logging and sampling

Core logging is undertaken by qualified geologists where all boreholes and their deflections are accurately logged in terms of lithology, mineralisation, alteration and structure. Logging details are entered directly into a database, making use of the Sable software package designed for this purpose. Geotechnical and structural logging is also carried out by geotechnical staff and structural geologists.

During the logging process, the sampling interval through the mineralized succession is determined and individual samples measured, marked-off and numbered according to standards. Sampling is done continuously throughout the sample section. Measurements and marking of sample lengths/widths are carried out according to the Bokoni Mine standards.

Once the sampling and logging of the boreholes is completed, the remaining core is stored on core racks. The sample intervals and numbers are replicated onto the remaining core surface for reference, and future re-sampling if necessary. The sampling data is fully documented and recorded on site, with records of all sampling maintained.

The sampled borehole core (intersections of Merensky and UG2) is then assayed for individual PGM content, as well as density and Cu and Ni contents.

 

53


Table of Contents

4. D. 7.2. Underground sampling

All on-reef development is sampled. The interval between sections is a minimum of 10 m and a maximum of 20 m. Advanced strike gully (“ASG”) sampling is done at 20 m intervals. ASG samples are approximately 30 m apart in the true dip direction. This creates a pseudo grid of 20 m by 30 m.

The sampler is responsible for accurately recording the true distance of the sampled sections from underground survey pegs. Underground sampling is typically done by means of cutting channels using a rotary diamond saw machine powered by compressed air.

The sampler records all geological features such as reef characteristics, prominent alterations, hanging wall or footwall, faults or dykes, potholes or major rolls and occurrences of reef left in the hanging wall or footwall. Deviations and anomalies are reported to the responsible geologist.

Each sample is carefully placed in a clean plastic bag and a bar coded sampling ticket is pasted on the bag and closed. Samples are captured in the Mineral Resources Management database by the sampler on the same day. The sampler is responsible for ensuring that his sections are captured correctly.

4. D. 7.3. Sample preparation, analyses, and security

A variety of analytical techniques have previously been used in assaying samples. Since 2000, diamond core samples have been sent to Anglo Research (previously Anglo American Research Labouratory) in Crown Mines where they are analysed for PGMs, Ni and Cu. The labouratory is operated by a subsidiary of Anglo American and is International Standards Organisation 17025 accredited.

Core samples are cut, split, bagged and checked against accompanying sample requisition sheets and sample descriptions by the geology department after which they are dispatched for analysis.

Samples are analysed for Pt, Pd and Au using fire assay (lead-collector and gold as co-collector) with inductively coupled plasma (“ICP”) finish. 3E is Pt+Pd+Au, for Rh (where 3E is greater than 1.5 g/t) using fire assay (lead collector and palladium as co-collector) with ICP finish and Cu and Ni using X-ray fluorescent analysis. Density is measured using Grabner pycnometer.

The labouratory has a comprehensive assay quality control system that includes blanks, certified reference materials, in-house reference materials, and twin streaming/replicate analyses.

Care is taken during the handling of samples to avoid potential cross-contamination or misplacement of samples. High and low grade materials are processed in completely separate areas throughout the labouratory, using dedicated and clearly labelled equipment. Samples are weighed and checked upon receipt. Quarry quartz is crushed and milled between individual batches to avoid any possible carry-over. This quartz is analysed with the batch and this data reported on during progress meetings.

Apart from basic sample preparation, there is currently no analytical labouratory at the Bokoni Mine. The Bokoni Mine utilizes the facilities at the Polokwane Smelter Complex (for assays of the mill feed, tailings and underground samples) and AR (assays of concentrate samples).

4. D.8. Bokoni Mine: Mineral Rights

The Bokoni Mine property consists of two “new order” mining licenses covering an area of 19,123.16 hectares. With the implementation of the refinancing transaction that was completed in December 2013, the Bokoni mining right, LP30/5/1/2/2/59 MR was amended to include two mineral properties Avoca 472 KS and Klipfontein 465 KS. The Bokoni Mine mining area, together with license numbers and expiry dates are presented in Table 1 below.

 

54


Table of Contents

Table 1: Bokoni Mine’s Mining License Areas.

 

Property

   Area (ha)      Old Order
License No.
   Original Expiry
Date
   Date Conversion
Granted
   New Order License
Number
  

Valid For

Middelpunt 420 KS

     10,206.30       06/2003    17/12/2025    12/05/2008

 

Amended
December 11,
2013

   LP 30/5/1/2/59/MR    Up to ) 23 years (as Bokoni’s mining license expires in 2038)

Diamand 422 KS

                 

Umkoanesstad 419 KS

                 

Zeekoegat 421 KS

                 

Brakfontein 464 KS

                 

Klipfontein 465 KS

     4,394.48                  

Avoca 472 KS

                 

Wintersveld 417 KS

     2 459.75       23/2003    26/11/2013    12/05/2008    LP 30/5/1/2/65/MR   

Jagdlust 418KS

     2 062.63                  
  

 

 

                

Total

     19,123.16                  
  

 

 

                

The Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves on the above properties are located within the Merensky and the UG2 reef horizons, which outcrop and sub crop on these properties and underlie the properties, dipping from the east towards the west. The Measured and Indicated Resources are primarily located in the shallow areas above 650 m while the balance of the Mineral Resource is located in the deeper areas below 650 m and is classified as inferred resources. Similarly, the majority of the Proven and Probable Reserves are located less than 650 m below the surface. Figure 3 illustrates the locations of the areas covered by the mining licenses according to South African Surveyor General’s plans. Traditionally, South African mining rights are issued over complete properties (farms) or portions thereof.

4. D.9. Surface rights

The surface overlying the Bokoni Mine is owned by the South African government, and tenure to the required areas is currently held through various surface right permits (“SRPs”) in terms of Section 90 of the Mining Rights Act of 1967 and lease agreements. Pursuant to ITEM  9 in Schedule II to the MPRDA, such SRPs will remain in force and attach to converted mining rights. Such SRPs have been re-registered in accordance with the requirements of ITEM 9.

Surface structures

In addition to the various mine shafts, the Bokoni Mine’s surface structures include:

 

    The mine buildings including: offices, change-houses and hostel facilities;

 

    Atokia Village;

 

    Workshops, compressor houses and stores;

 

    Concentrators (which includes milling); and

 

    Tailings dams and waste rock dumps.

 

55


Table of Contents

Figure 3 is a plan indicating the Bokoni Mine’s surface infrastructure and mining licenses

 

LOGO

4. D.10. Bokoni Mine Operations

Mining operations began in 1969, initiated by Anglovaal, a traditional South African Mining House and OK Bazaars, a South African chain store. In 1970, the mine was sold to Rustenburg Platinum Mines, a subsidiary of JCI Limited (the historic mining house) in which Anglo American held a significant interest. In the mid-1990’s, JCI Limited was unbundled and its platinum interests listed separately as Lebowa, which later merged with other Anglo mines to become Anglo Platinum Limited.

The Bokoni Mine produces both Merensky and UG2 ore. Merensky production originated at the Vertical Shaft operations and was subsequently expanded to include the UM2 Decline operations and most recently the Brakfontein Shaft. UG2 production commenced in 2001 at the Middelpunt Hill operations, via a number of adits and has recently developed into underground operation at the Middelpunt Hill.

The mining operation consists of a vertical shaft and three decline shaft systems to access underground mine development on the Merensky and UG2 reef horizons. The Bokoni Mine has installed road, water and power infrastructure, as well as two processing concentrators, sufficient to meet its operational requirements up to completion of its first phase growth plans to reach 160.0 kilo tonnes per month (“ktpm”). The Bokoni Mine has an extensive shallow ore body, capable of supporting a life-of-mine plan that is estimated to exceed 23 years (as Bokoni’s mining license expires in 2038). Current mining operations are being conducted at shallow depths, on average 300m below surface. This benefits the Bokoni Mine’s operations in that there are no major refrigeration (and consequent power) requirements at shallower mining depths.

The Bokoni Mine’s production for Fiscal 2015 averaged 139.7 ktpm of ore, a decrease of 3% from the previous year. UG2 production is mined exclusively from MPH which consists of four adits and two underground levels. Merensky ore is produced from three underground shafts, namely: Vertical shaft, UM2 shaft and Brakfontein shaft and from the Klipfontein opencast operations. The Vertical shaft, which started in 1973, is the oldest of the three shafts and accounted for the bulk of the Merensky production. In the latter part of Fiscal 2015, the UM2 and Vertical Merensky shaft operations were placed on care and maintenance. The new Brakfontein shaft is in a ramp up phase and is planned to increase from its current production levels of 30.0 ktpm, to a steady state production level of 100.0 ktpm by 2018.

Given the magnitude of the Bokoni Mine’s ore body, lying open at depth with its numerous attack points, management is of the view that the Bokoni Mine has the potential to be developed into a 240.0 ktpm (265,000 PGM ounces per annum) steady state operation in the medium to longer term.

 

56


Table of Contents

The older Vertical and UM2 shafts made use of conventional mining methods for narrow tabular ore bodies. Ore broken in stopes is transported laterally by means of track bound equipment and then hoisted through a vertical shaft system at Vertical shaft and an incline shaft system at UM2 shaft.

The new Brakfontein shaft is being developed on a semi-mechanized basis, using a hybrid mining method, whereby ore broken in stopes is loaded directly onto a strike conveyor belt and taken out of the mine through a main decline conveyer belt system. This results in less human intervention in the hoisting process and a resultant lower unit operating cost of production. Development of haulages and crosscuts are effected by means of mechanized mining methods, and stoping is conducted using hand held electric drilling machines.

The MPH shaft is in the process of converting the transport of broken ore from its current mechanized hauling system to a conveyor belt transport system similar to that of Brakfontein shaft. Vamping opportunities in the older adit areas are being investigated to supplement underground mining production.

The Klipfontein opencast operations is a short life operation that mines the Merensky subcrop to a depth of about 50m below surface. The ore from this operation, about 40,000 tpm, is used to fill the spare mill capacity over the next four years until underground operations at Brakfontein and Middelpunt Hill ramp up to their steady state levels of 100,000 tpm and 60,000 tpm respectively. The remaining expected life of the opencast operation is approximately two years.

When Atlatsa took management control of the Bokoni Mine in 2009, the Company determined that the production rate should be increased significantly from levels of around 85,000 tpm to around 160,000 tpm, in order to reflect the true quality and scale of the Bokoni Mine mineral resource. The planned growth in production was to be achieved by realizing the planned production ramp up at the newly developed Brakfontein Merensky project.

Atlatsa and its 49% interest partner, Anglo Platinum, undertook a strategic review of the Bokoni Mine, as well as key technical and financial assumptions informing the Bokoni Transaction. The outcome of the review resulted in a new strategic plan for the Bokoni Mine that would look to continue with production ramp up at the Brakfontein Shaft to 100 ktpm and grow production to 60 ktpm at the Middelpunt Hill Shaft. Whilst the Brakfontein and Middelpunt Hill projects are being developed to steady state operations tonnage, the remainder of the mill gap being supplemented from opencast surface sources.

The Bokoni Mine lease area is extensive, covering some 19,500 ha including a strike length of almost 20 km and a dip length of almost 10 km. The Merensky and UG2 mineralized horizons are in the order of 300 m apart and either outcrop (in the hills) or sub crop (in the valleys) and extend to depths beyond 2,000 m below surface, towards the south-western boundary.

The above-mentioned extent of the Bokoni Mine requires a tailored depletion strategy, including various phases. Therefore the mining rights area has been divided into a series of mining blocks according to strike length, of approximately 6 km and depth, no more than nine production levels per shaft system.

The Bokoni Mine’s current depletion plan includes a generic access strategy which proposes a system of declines and vertical shafts to exploit the mining blocks. Initial access to the shallow Merensky and UG2 horizons is by means of separate decline shaft systems. These decline shaft systems will facilitate mining to a depth of approximately 650 m below surface. From the lowest level, vertical shafts will be raise-bored to surface and equipped to provide men and material access plus ventilation so that mining can continue to deeper levels. The access infrastructure is depicted in figure 4 below.

Figure 4. Bokoni Mine LOM infrastructure

 

LOGO

 

57


Table of Contents

Various mining methods are employed at the Bokoni Mine. All stoping operations are conducted by means of hand held drills, with the removal of ore from stope panels done by means of scrapers and winches. Conventional development was conducted at Vertical and UM2 shafts. Development at Brakfontein and Middelpunt Hill is done by mobile Trackless equipment. Horizontal transport of ore was done by means of track bound locomotives at Vertical shaft and UM2 shafts. At Brakfontein, and increasingly at Middelpunt Hill, ore from stopes is tipped directly on conveyor belts that transport the ore horizontally and vertically out the mine. The use of load and haul trackless equipment is used extensively to move broken waste and ore to tips at Middelpunt Hill and Brakfontein.

Merensky ore was produced from the Vertical shaft and an inclined shaft on the adjacent Umkoanestad property (UM2 Inclined shaft). Production from these shafts was stopped in the latter part of Fiscal 2015 due to the long distances between the shafts and the working places, and current Merensky production of 35,000 tpm is expected to be replaced by production from the Brakfontein Merensky Project (BRK Merensky Project), which is located in the south-eastern extremity of the Bokoni Mine.

Currently, UG2 ore is produced exclusively from the Middelpunt Hill shaft, which comprises a number of adits and underground development. Production from the adits will be exhausted in the near future and UG2 production will be replaced by production from underground development. Production at Middelpunt Hill is currently 35,000 tpm and will be increased to a steady state level of 60,000 tpm by 2018.

The Bokoni Mine currently has two concentrator plants, one for the processing of ore from the Merensky ore and the other for the processing of ore from the UG2. These concentrators are situated adjacent to one another close to the Vertical shaft.

The Merensky concentrator (capacity 100.0 ktpm) is currently dedicated to processing Merensky ore from the Vertical shaft, UM2 Inclined shaft and Brakfontein shaft. The UG2 concentrator (capacity 65.0 ktpm) is dedicated to processing ore from the Middelpunt Hill UG2 adits and decline.

4. D.10.1. Merensky MF3 Plant

The current 100.0 ktp Merensky concentrator, built in 1990/91 was upgraded in 2009 from 85.0 ktpm to 100.0 ktpm. The concentrator includes three milling stages with inter-stage flotation circuits. By today’s standards, the Merensky concentrator employs older technology but nevertheless maintains high operating efficiencies and availability.

4. D.10.2. UG2 MF2 Plant

The 65.0 ktpm UG2 concentrator includes two milling stages with inter-stage flotation circuits (MF2). It is a dedicated concentrator, constructed in 2000 to treat UG2 ore that has subsequently been mined at the Middelpunt Hill adits. The UG2 concentrator can treat Merensky ore and tests conducted, indicated that acceptable recoveries on Merensky Reef was achieved. The UG2 concentrator is located adjacent to the Merensky concentrator and is similarly well maintained, providing good operating availability.

Merensky and UG2 concentrates are stored separately ahead of the common Larox concentrate filter. Filtration is conducted on a campaign basis and the capacity is adequate for current production.

Merensky concentrate is filtered to a moisture content of about 5% and UG2 concentrate to about 14%. The difference is due to the different particle sizes of the products. The smelter requires a moisture content of less than 15%, therefore in both cases the concentrate is within the moisture specification.

All of the Bokoni Mine’s concentrate is currently supplied to Anglo Platinum’s Polokwane Smelter Complex pursuant to an agreement between the Bokoni Mine and Anglo Platinum (through RPM). The Refiner (RPM) pays Bokoni Mine monthly for Bokoni Mine’s concentrate. The price payable is based on a fixed market-related percentage of the equivalent ZAR price for the various metals for the preceding month, taking into account the costs of smelting and refining to be incurred by RPM.

As per common practice in concentrate sale agreements, various penalties, for concentrate not meeting the agreed specification, are provided for in the off-take agreement and are deductible from the price payable for concentrate.

4. D.11. Estimates of Mineralization

The Mineral Resource and Reserve estimates are compiled in accordance with the SAMREC Code.

 

58


Table of Contents

Cautionary Note to Investors Concerning Estimates of Measured and Indicated Resources

This Annual Report uses the terms “measured resources” and “indicated resources”. Atlatsa advises investors that while those terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the SEC does not recognize them. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves.

Cautionary Note to Investors Concerning Estimates of Inferred Resources

This Annual Report uses the term “inferred resources”. Atlatsa advises investors that while this term is recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the SEC does not recognize it. “Inferred resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of a mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources may not form the basis of economic studies, except in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.

As noted through-out this Annual Report, the Company prepared its reserve and resource estimates in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101rather than Industry Guide 7.

See the “Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors”.

Investors should refer to the disclosure under the heading “Resource Category (Classification) Definitions” in the “Glossary of Terms” .

Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates are reported as follows for the Bokoni Mine properties (including the existing Bokoni Mine, opencast and planned project expansions at Brakfontein and Middlepunt). Mineral Resources (Remaining Resources) are also reported for the regions outside of the existing mine plans and project expansion plans but within the Bokoni Mine properties.

The Company estimates its ore reserves and mineral resources based on information compiled by appropriately qualified persons (“QPs”) relating to the geological and technical data on the size, depth, shape and grade of the ore body and suitable production techniques and recovery rates. Such an analysis requires complex geological judgements to interpret the data. The estimation of recoverable reserves is based upon factors such as estimates of foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, future capital requirements and production costs, along with geological assumptions and judgements made in estimating the size and grade of the ore body.

The annual Mineral Resource and Reserve Statement (below) for the Bokoni Mine were updated as of December 31, 2015. The QPs responsible for the updating of the mineral resource is Mr G. Mitchell Pri. Sci. Nat., Mr A. Deiss, Pri. Sci. Nat. and Dr W.D. Northrop. (Independent consultants at ExplorMine). The QP responsible for updating the mineral reserve is Mr. B. Reddy, Pri. Sci. Nat. (Executive: Mineral strategy and exploration at Atlatsa). In the opinion of the QPs, there are no material changes in the resource and reserve estimates of 2015 as compared to the 2014 mineral resource and reserve estimates.

The Mineral Resource and Reserve Estimates as at December 31, 2015 are shown in Tables 2 and 3 below. Mineral Resource estimates in the tables include Mineral Reserves. There have been no material changes in the Mineral Resource and Reserve year on year. The major difference is due to the incorporation of The Klipfontein and Avoca mineral properties into the Bokoni Operations.

The Company estimates and reports ore reserves and mineral resources in line with the principles contained in the South African Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves of 2007, revised in 2009 (SAMREC 2009), known as the “SAMREC Code”.

 

59


Table of Contents

Table 2: Mineral Reserves Tabulation for the Bokoni Mine as at December 31, 2015

 

Bokoni Platinum Mines Proprietary Limited

   Total      Attributable to Atlatsa  
          Reef type    Mt      Grade
4E g/t
     Containing      Attributable %      Mt      Grade
4E g/t
 
               4E Moz           

Ore Reserves

   Proved    MR      28.80         4.03         3.73         51         14.69         4.03   
   Probable    MR      8.30         4.45         1.19         51         4.23         4.45   
        

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   Total Reserve    MR      37.10         4.13         4.92         51         18.92         4.13   
        

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
  

 

Proved

   UG2      27.22         5.17         4.52         51         13.88         5.17   
   Probable    UG2         5.17         2.77            8.51         5.17   
           

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 
   Total Reserve    UG2         5.17         7.30            22.39         5.17   
        

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 
   Total Reserve         81.01         4.69         12.22            41.31         4.69   
        

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Notes:

 

(1) The QP responsible for the compilation of the mineral reserves is B. Reddy, B.Sc. Pri Sci. Nat., Executive: Technical Services at Atlatsa.
(2) The mineral reserves are inclusive of dilution and recovery factors.
(3) The grade indicated is the mill delivered grade.

A cut-off grade of 3.14 g/t for the Merensky Reef was applied.

A cut-off grade of 3.42 g/t for the UG2 Reef was applied.

 

(4) Metal price assumptions of US$1,300/oz platinum, US$820/oz palladium, US$1,200/oz rhodium and US$1,300/oz gold were used in the estimation of mineral reserves. The R/$ exchange rate used was R 11.20. **
(5) 4E is the sum of platinum (Pt), palladium (Pd), rhodium (Rh) and gold (Au).

Table 3: Mineral Resources Tabulation for the Bokoni Mine as at December 31, 2015

 

Mineral Resource Category

   Reef
Type
     Tonnes
(million)
     Grade
4E
(g/t) 1
     4E
Kg’s
(‘000)
   4E
(Moz)
     Grade
4E
(g/t)
     4E
Kg’s
(‘000)
     4E
(Moz)
     Pt
grade
(g/t)
     Pd
grade
(g/t)
     Rh
grade
(g/t)
     Au
grade
(g/t)
     Cu
grade
(%)
     Ni
grade
(%)

Measured

     MR         93.28         4.90            14.68         3.01         1.39         0.17         0.31         0.08         0.21         93.28         4.90      

Indicated

     MR         49.68         4.86            7.76         2.99         1.40         0.17         0.30         0.08         0.20         49.68         4.86      

Measured + Indicated

     MR         142.96         4.88            22.44         3.00         1.39         0.17         0.31         0.08         0.21         142.96         4.88      

Inferred

     MR         201.87         5.03            32.64         3.09         1.46         0.18         0.30         0.08         0.20         201.87         5.03      

 

Mineral Resource Category

   Reef
type
     Tonnes
(million)
     Grade
4E
(g/t)
     4E
Kg’s
(‘000)
   4E
(Moz)
     4E
Kg’s
(‘000)
     4E
(Moz)
     Pt
grade
(g/t)
     Pd
grade
(g/t)
     Rh
grade
(g/t)
     Au
grade
(g/t)
     Cu
grade
(%)
     Ni
grade
(%)
 

Measured

     UG2         201.38         6.36            41.15         2.62         3.09         0.51         0.13         0.05         0.17         201.38         6.36   

Indicated

     UG2         93.97         6.44            19.46         2.65         3.14         0.52         0.13         0.05         0.17         93.97         6.44   

Measured + Indicated

     UG2         295.35         6.38            60.61         2.63         3.11         0.52         0.13         0.05         0.17         295.35         6.38   

Inferred

     UG2         182.85         6.55            38.5         2.68         3.23         0.53         0.12         0.05         0.17         182.85         6.55   

Notes:

 

(1) The QPs responsible for the compilation of the mineral resources are G. Mitchell Pri. Sci. Nat., A. Deiss Pri. Sci. Nat. and Dr. W. Northrop. All QPs are independent consultants to Atlatsa.
(2) The mineral resources are inclusive of mineral reserves.
(3) The mineral resources are inclusive of dilution and recovery factors.
(4) A cut-off grade of 2.81 g/t for the Merensky Reef was applied.

A cut-off grade of 2.96 g/t for the UG2 Reef was applied.

 

(5) Metal price assumptions of US$1,300/oz platinum, US$820/oz palladium, US$1,200/oz rhodium and US$1,300/oz gold were used in the estimation of mineral reserves. The R/$ exchange rate used was R 11.20. **
(6) 4E is the sum of platinum (Pt), palladium (Pd), rhodium (Rh) and gold (Au).

 

60


Table of Contents
** The Company’s mineral reserve and resource estimates are calculated using the best estimate of future metal pricing formulated from a combination of analyst consensus, bank consensus and an internal pricing deck provided by Anglo Platinum. The price assumptions used are based on long term metal prices looking forward and not historical averages or prices for any particular historical date or period. The Company uses the long term prices looking forward due to the long life of mine timeframe as well as the fact that two long term projects, Middelpunt Hill and Brakfontein, will only achieve steady state production levels by the fourth quarter of 2016 and 100,000 tpm by 2019, respectively.

The Company estimates and reports ore reserves and mineral resources in line with the principles contained SAMREC.

The reason the Company regards this as the most applicable method is:

 

    Bokoni Mine is in a ramp up phase and the Company considers a forward looking approach to be more appropriate;

 

    The exceptionally long life of the ore body; and

 

    The historical value would not be appropriate based on the life of mine plan.

The determination of a SAMREC resource is itself an estimation process that involves varying degrees of uncertainty depending on how the resources are classified (i.e., measured, indicated or inferred). The estimates directly impact when the Company defers exploration and evaluation expenditure.

4. D.11. Estimation Methods

The Mineral Resource estimates for precious and base metal grades, thickness, density take a practical mining width cut into account. The total 4E PGM grade is the summation of the individual prill split grades for Pt, Pd Rh and Au.

The modelling procedure adopted was as follows:

 

    the overall dip per farm was used to calculate the true reef thickness. Dip corrections were applied for true mining cut thickness per area, taking average dip angles into account:

 

    Zeekoegat and Diamand:       25°

Middelpunt:                          22°

Umkoanestad:                      18°

Brakfontein:                         16°

 

    Modelling was completed using Datamine mining software in two dimensions.

 

    The validated boreholes and underground samples were combined, compared and investigated geostatistically in order to characterize and optimize the estimation process.

 

    Statistical and variogram analyses were completed.

 

    The reef was investigated for the presence of distinct geological and statistical domains.

 

    The ordinary kriging estimation technique was used for estimation of all the variables.

 

    For the block model estimates, block size dimensions of 250 m by 250 m were used within and immediately adjacent to workings. The block dimension for the remainder of the area was 500 m by 500 m.

 

    A minimum of seven and a maximum of thirty samples were required within the search ellipse for interpolation. This was kept the same for all variables.

 

    The resource tonnages were estimated using kriged density and thickness estimates, modified by dip correction factor and geological loss factor.

 

    The Mineral Resource estimates used for mine planning and reporting are contained in a block model that is a combination of the kriged hanging wall, channel and footwall layer estimates, weighted according to the kriged density and respective thicknesses.

 

    The Mineral Resource estimate considers optimum stope width cuts.

No geotechnical considerations were necessary for consideration during resource estimation due to the absence of chromite stringers or other sharp lithological contacts located in the direct hanging wall of the Merensky.

The Mineral Resource Management (“MRM”) underground sampling database and the Sable borehole database data were used for resource estimation. The Sable database has provision for storing prill, density and base metal analysis whereas the underground sample sections (MRM) can only store 4E grades. All data used was converted to WGS84 (LO31) format in 2003.

No PGM correction factor was applied to the borehole or underground sample values.

 

61


Table of Contents

Where samples have missing density values the mean density values per rock type were assigned and then used during compositing and estimation. Assigned values were not used for statistical analysis or variogram modelling. The Resource and Reserve conversion factors used for the estimation are shown in table 4 below:

Table 4: Resource and Reserve conversion factors

 

Reef Type

   Geological
Loss
    Dip     Pillar Losses     Extraction %     Dilution by
Mining
Activities
    MCF     Off Reef
Dilution
 

UG2

     11     17 0       11     74     19.8     97     6

Merensky

     17     15 0       6     68     22.6     97     5

Known issues that materially affect mineral resources and mineral reserves

The Company is currently unaware of any issues that materially affect these Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves. The Bokoni Mine has successfully mined and processed Merensky Reef and UG2 and has economically produced 4E concentrate for the last twenty five years.

4. D.12. Life of Mine (“LOM”)

The current production strategy at Bokoni (base profile) is to produce at 160.0 ktpm from current mining infrastructure, equivalent to the installed processing capacity of the Bokoni concentrator plant. Production from the older UM2 and Vertical Shafts was stopped in August and December 2015, respectively, with both shafts being placed under care and maintenance. The shaft infrastructures will be used to supplement the pumping and ventilation requirements of the Brakfontein Shaft. Thereafter; production will increase to 240.0 ktpm, together with construction of a new concentrator plant to process the additional increase in volume. The additional production will be from an expansion of the current Middelpunt Hill Shaft from 60.0 ktpm to 120.0 ktpm and an additional 20.0 ktpm from a new project on the Zeekoegat mineral property, utilizing the Vertical Shaft infrastructure.

The figure below shows the LOM profile.

Figure 5. LOM planned ore production

 

LOGO

 

62


Table of Contents

4. D.13. Production History

The production history for the last three years is shown in Table 5 below.

Table 5. Production summary for the past three years

 

     2013      2014      2015  

Tonnes Milled

     1,312,631         1,743,781         1,676,694   

4E In Situ Grade

     4.70         4.76         5.17   

4E Oz Produced (underground)

     156,578         174,361         174,973   

Opencast 4E Oz produced

     13,717         19,675         15,766   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total 4E Oz Produced

     170,295         194,036         190,740   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

To illustrate the impact of placing the Vertical and UM2 shafts on care and maintenance, refer to the table below.

Table 6. Production summary split for the different shafts

 

Description

   Unit      YTD 2014      YTD 2015      %     Q4 2014      Q4 2015      %  

Tonnes delivered

     Tonnes         1 745 245         1 681 656         (4 %)      356 156         396 756         11

Underground

     Tonnes         967 498         1 078 286         11     221 618         274 629         24

Under care and maintenance

     Tonnes         492 278         379 417         (23 %)      108 428         58 432         (46 %) 

Opencast

     Tonnes         285 469         223 953         (22 %)      26 110         63 695         144

Tonnes milled

     Tonnes         1 743 781         1 676 694         (4 %)      454 030         430 285         (5 %) 

Underground

     Tonnes         967 011         1 082 277         12     227 050         278 540         23

Under care and maintenance

     Tonnes         491 301         374 922         (24 %)      110 626         59 518         (46 %) 

Opencast

     Tonnes         285 469         219 495         (23 %)      116 353         92 227         (21 %) 

4E Ounces

     Tonnes         194 036         190 740         (2 %)      48 414         46 698         (4 %) 

Underground

     Tonnes         118 734         132 483         12     27 960         33 968         21

Under care and maintenance

     Tonnes         55 627         42 490         (24 %)      12 846         6 103         (52 %) 

Opencast

     Tonnes         19 675         15 766         (20 %)      7 607         6 628         (13 %) 

4. D.14. Infrastructure

4. D.14.1. Power

The Bokoni Mine’s electricity requirements are provided directly from Eskom, the South African national power utility. The mine has a contract with Eskom that guarantees a notified maximum demand of 40 MVA but the actual steady state use is around 30 MVA. Eskom supplies all power to site via the Middelpunt 132/22 kV substation. In-feed to this substation is via two separate and independent 132 kV overhead line structures, each from a different substation on the Eskom grid. There is thus true ring / dual feed to site.

The power supply lines to site are robust, but there are concerns about generation at a national level. Reliability of supply was formerly good, but difficulties began to be experienced with the capacity of Eskom to meet national demand in the second half of 2007. This culminated in many South African mines having to shut down operations for a few days in January 2008, owing to the near-collapse of the national power grid. The situation was stable, however in June 2014, emergency power cuts took place countrywide after two units at two power stations tripped and a portion of the capacity usually imported from Cahora Bassa became unavailable.

Load shedding was reintroduced in early November 2014 and rolling blackouts were still announced and implemented by Eskom up to February 2015, in a bid to stop a total power grid collapse. There is still ongoing concern as to whether Eskom will

 

63


Table of Contents

successfully meet demand in future years. Bokoni Mine has installed generators that if and when the load shedding takes place, all underground employees can be evacuated.

Huge power price increases have been experienced recently, and are likely to continue for some years, as funding for new generation projects are funded by the consumer.

4. D.14.2. Water

The Bokoni Mine is supplied with raw water from the Olifants River via the Lebalelo Pipeline which was constructed and is operated by a Water Users Association predominantly made up of mines in the area. Additional water is available from the dewatering of the mines. Potable water is supplied from five boreholes supplying 30 to 50 kl per day. It is pumped into a Braithwaite tank for storage and then used on site. There is also a filtration plant used as a backup to meet plant service water needs. It is unlikely that the Bokoni Mine will suffer business interruption losses due to water shortages.

4. D.14.3 Tailings dams

There are two tailings dams at the Bokoni Mine, the Merensky tailings dam and the UG2 tailings dam, both of which are located near the Concentrators. The Merensky tailings dam has an area of approximately 70 ha and the UG2 tailings dam has an area of approximately 63 ha.

The current tailings dams have a combined capacity of 170 ktpm at a maximum rate of rise of 2.5 m per annum. This is adequate for current production levels.

4. D.14.4. Waste rock dumps

Waste rock dumps are located adjacent to the various shafts to accommodate the broken waste rock hoisted from underground. The inert waste rock is used for construction and in future may be used to clad the slopes of the tailings dams.

4. D.15. Personnel

4. D.15.1. Organizational structure and compliment

The Bokoni Mine’s organizational structure is similar to other South African mines, whereby production is divided into the departments of mining, engineering and services. Services include mineral resource management, finance, human resources, health and safety and the concentrator. Each department is managed by a head of department who reports to the general manager.

As required by South African statute, various persons are legally appointed to their positions, including the mine manager and his immediate subordinates as well as the engineering manager and his subordinates. Appointed managers are obliged to ensure that the mining activities are carried out according to the Minerals Act regulations and/or codes of practice/standard procedures drafted and adopted by the Bokoni Mine.

The Bokoni Mine at December 31, 2015 employed a total of 5,205 people across all disciplines and in all categories, as shown in Table 7 below.

Table 7. The Bokoni Mine employee compliment

 

Patterson Grade

  

Description

   Actual 2015      Actual 2014  

A (A1-A4)

   Unskilled      0         391   

B (B1-B7)

   Semi-Skilled      2,851         2,590   

C (C1-C4)

   Skilled      538         558   

D (C5-D4)

   Professionals (supervisory level) & Middle Management      79         85   

E (E2-EU)

   Senior Management      8         10   

F

   Contractors      2,134         2,467   
     

 

 

    

 

 

 

TOTAL

        5,611         6,101   
     

 

 

    

 

 

 

The above labour compliment includes all personnel necessary for the current operations. Also see ITEM 4. A.4. Bokoni Restructure Plan , where a process is being undertaken to reduce the head count at Bokoni Mine.

4. D.15.2. Employment policy

The Bokoni Mine’s employment policy is to include all core skills from rock-face to manager as permanent ‘payroll’ employees. An agreement was reached with unions to the effect that contract labour would be utilized on UM2 shaft, which had

 

64


Table of Contents

a limited life of mine, in order to enable the mine to use its own employees on the build-up of production on the long life Brakfontein mine.

The Bokoni Mine, however, continues to employ contractors in certain non-core activities.

4. D.15.3. Skills shortage and development

The Bokoni Mine suffers from the industry-wide skills shortage, particularly in the mining processing and engineering disciplines. Currently the Bokoni Mine has a Skills Retention Policy which includes various initiatives to retain employees with scarce skills including retention allowances. The skills shortage as at December 31, 2015 is summarized in Table 8.

Table 8. Current Bokoni Mine critical skills shortage

 

Description

   Actual      Required      (Shortage) / Surplus  

Shift Supervisors (C5-D1)

     49         41         8   

Miners (C1-C2)

     52         67         (15

Mine Overseers (D2)

     9         8         1   

Artisans (C2)

     120         111         9   

Engineering Foreman (C5-D1)

     17         9         8   

Engineers (D4)

     4         4         0   

Mining Managers

     5         5         0   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     256         245         11   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The skills shortage is also being addressed through training and development. The Bokoni Mine has a Mining and Engineering Learnership programme and Cadetship in order to train miners. Targeted recruitment continues to take place at the mine.

The Bokoni Mine training centre has been accredited by the Mining Qualifications Authority (“MQA”). The first intake of Rock Breaker level 1and 2 were scheduled in 2013. As per table 9; Bokoni Mine has the following learners in different stages of progress:

Table 9. Graduates Development Programmes, Work Experience, Mining and Engineering Learnership

 

Description

   2014      2015  

Community Cadetship

     83         30   

Mining Learnership (Rock Breaking 2&3)

     104         119   

Engineering Learnership

     56         60   

MQA Bokoni Graduates

     13         13   

MQA External Graduates

     12         53   

P1/P2 (Bokoni)

     8         12   

P1/P2 External

     —           45   

In-house and legal compliance training takes place for all core occupations and also for Learner Shift Supervisor programme. The mine no longer utilizes Anglo Platinum training facilities. The Bokoni Mine has an Adult Basic Education and Training programme and an HIV/AIDS Wellness programme in place. The local community also benefits from these programmes.

Bokoni Mine has also signed Service Level Agreements and Memorandum of Understanding with accredited training providers such as Further Educational and Training (“FET”) Colleges to provide portable skills through mining and engineering related courses. During 2014 the name changed to meaning Trade Vocational Education and Training (“TVET”).

Bokoni Mine also received an accreditation to provide Occupational Health and Safety for Safety training by the MQA. This includes Chamber of Mines Safety Officer Certificate (“COMSOC”) 1 and 2 in addition to the normal health and safety training.

4. D.16. Tax and Royalties

The current South African Income tax regime for companies applies to Bokoni Mine and includes the following tax regime:

 

    Company income tax rate of 28 % on taxable income.

 

65


Table of Contents
    Secondary tax on companies (“STC”), a tax on dividends declared, of 10%, until March 2012, after which STC is abolished and replaced with 15% withholding tax.

The South African mining sector enjoys immediate tax relief on capital expenditure i.e. capital expenditure can be offset against taxable profit in the year it is incurred (or can be carried forward to create a tax shield) i.e. capital expenditure is not depreciated or amortized for tax purposes.

4. D.16.1. The Royalty Act

The South African government has enacted the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Royalty Act, 2008 (Act no. 28 of 2008) (“Royalty Act”), which imposes a royalty payable to the South African government by business based upon financial profits made through the transfer of mineral resources. The legislation was passed on November 17, 2008 and came into operation on March 1, 2010.

As a result of the legislation resulting from this Royalty Act, a royalty will be levied for the benefit of the National Revenue Fund of the government of the Republic of South Africa. The amount levied is based on a percentage calculated by a formula, up to a maximum of 5% on gross sales of refined mineral resources and 7% on gross sales of unrefined mineral resources.

The ultimate royalty to be charged is formula-based, varying according to the profitability of mining operations. As the Bokoni Mine produces metal-in-concentrate (unrefined mineral resources) the minimum royalty payable with effect from March 1, 2010 is 0.5% of gross sales and the maximum royalty payable is 7% of gross sales, based on the following formula:

Royalty percentage payable on gross sales of unrefined metal produced = 0.5 + [(Earnings Before Interest and Tax (“EBIT”) x 9)/gross sales]. The calculated royalty tax percentage for Bokoni Mine was the minimum percentage of 0.5% (2012: 0.5%). The percentage cannot be less than 0.5%.

The royalty is accounted for on a monthly basis in the accounting records of Bokoni.

The payments in respect of the royalty are due in three intervals:

 

    an initial provision payment due six months into the financial year (i.e. June 30), based on actual and estimated figures;

 

    a second provisional payment due twelve months into the financial year (i.e. December 31), based on actual and estimated figures; and

 

    a final payment due six months after the financial year (i.e. June 30), based on a true up calculation.

The Fiscal 2015 royalty tax percentage and resulting royalty expenses for the Bokoni Mine were 0.5% and $0.8 million (ZAR9.3 million), respectively, representing the minimum rates. The royalty tax percentage and royalty expenses for Fiscal 2014 were 0.5% and $1.0 million (ZAR10.4 million), respectively.

4. D.17. Environmental liabilities and matters

The South African National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998, as well as the MPRDA, which applies to all prospecting and mining operations, requires that these operations are carried out in accordance with generally accepted principles of sustainable development. It is a MPRDA requirement that an applicant for a mining right must make prescribed financial provision for the rehabilitation or management of negative environmental impacts, which must be reviewed annually. The financial provisions deal with anticipated costs for premature closure; planned decommissioning and closure; and post closure management of residual and latent environmental impacts. The financial provisions deal with anticipated costs for:

 

    planned decommissioning and closure; and

 

    post closure management of residual and latent environmental impacts.

The Company makes full provision for the future cost of rehabilitating mine sites and related production facilities on a discounted basis at the time of developing the mines and installing those facilities.

The rehabilitation provision represents the present value of rehabilitation costs relating to mine sites, which are expected to be incurred up to 2039, which is when the producing mine properties are expected to cease operations. These provisions have been created on the Company’s internal estimates. Assumptions based on the current economic environment have been made, which management believes are a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the future liability. These estimates are reviewed regularly to take into account any material changes to the assumptions. However, actual rehabilitation costs will ultimately depend upon future market prices for necessary rehabilitation works required that will reflect market conditions at the relevant time.

 

66


Table of Contents

Furthermore, the timing of rehabilitation is likely to depend on when the mine ceases to produce at economically viable rates. This, in turn, will depend on future PGM prices, which are inherently uncertain.

An assessment of the Bokoni Mine was completed in Q4 2015, to determine the environmental rehabilitation liability as at December 31, 2015. The total environmental rehabilitation liability for the Bokoni Mine, in current monetary terms (discounted at the 2015 risk free rate of 9.63% (2014:7.96%)), was estimated at $13.8 million (ZAR153.9 million) compared to $13.4 million (ZAR132.9 million) as at December 31, 2014.

The undiscounted future environmental rehabilitation liability was estimated at $23.4 million (ZAR261.2 million) as at December 31, 2015, compared to $19.3 million (ZAR191.6 million) as at December 31, 2014.

The Company makes annual contributions to a dedicated trust fund (the “Environmental Trust Fund”) to cover the estimated cost of rehabilitation during and at the end of life of the Bokoni Mine. As at December 31, 2015, the amount invested in the Environmental Trust Fund was $3.7 million (ZAR41.2 million) compared to $3.7 million (ZAR37.0 million) at December 31, 2014. The $10.1 million (ZAR112.7 million) shortfall between the funds invested in the Environmental Trust Fund and the estimated rehabilitation cost is covered by a guarantee from RPM.

Atlatsa’s mining and exploration activities are subject to extensive environmental laws and regulations. These laws and regulations are continually changing and are generally becoming more restrictive. The Company has incurred, and expects to incur in future, expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations, but cannot predict the full amount of such future expenditures. Estimated future reclamation costs are based principally on current legal and regulatory requirements.

Currently, the most significant environmental liabilities that have been identified at Bokoni Mine are dust generation from the tailings dams and seepage of contaminated water from the settling dams.

The consolidated Merensky tailings dam at the Bokoni Mine has been identified as a major source of dust in this relatively arid area. At present, some remedial steps have been undertaken to allay the dust and these include partial vegetation of the slopes of the dam as well as constructing wind-screens on the top of the dam. Both are considered inadequate and in the longer term as legislation becomes stricter it is expected that the slopes and top of the tailings dams will have to be clad with rock and/or adequately vegetated.

Initial shallow underground mining at the Bokoni Mine intersected both weathered and fractured overlying aquifers. Therefore, there is an ongoing seepage of ground water into the workings from the Rapholo River. In addition, water from the decant water catchment dam below the tailings dam also seeps into the workings. Total ingress is in the order of 11,000 cubic metres per day. Subsequently there is on-going pumping of a significant amount of water out of the mines and into surface settling dams. Currently, the existing Water Usage License (“WUL”), granted in October 2008, permits discharge up to 1.9 million cubic metres of water annually into the Rapholo River until April 2009. The Bokoni Mine requested an amendment to the WUL, which was declined by the Department of Water Affairs, but an appeal was submitted to the water tribunal. Currently a water study is in progress to update the water model for the mine, to increase the understanding of the aquifer. No water was discharged into the Rapholo River during 2013 and in 2014. All discharges into the river have been stopped.

In December 31, 2013, Bokoni Mine has identified a future pollution risk posed by deep groundwater in certain underground shafts. Various studies have been undertaken by the mine since 2012. In view of the documentation of current information for the accurate estimation of the liability, we are unable to quantify the extent of either the existence or extent of pollution or its source, if any. As such the criteria in IAS 37 for recognizing a liability have not been met.

4. D.18. The Ga-Phasha Project

As per the recently completed Refinancing Plan (see ITEM  4. A.5. Refinance Plan (2012-2014) ), the Ga-Phasha project was split into two sets of mineral properties. The Paschaskraal and De Kamp mineral properties were sold to Anglo Platinum on December 13, 2013 and the Klipfontein and Avoca mineral properties were incorporated into the exiting Bokoni Mine.

4. D.19. The Platreef Project

4. D.19.1. Agreements

Atlatsa holds a 51% interest in the Kwanda through Bokoni Holdco. The Boikgantsho Project was sold in its entirety to Anglo Platinum on December 13, 2013 as part of the Refinancing Plan (see ITEM 4. A.5. Refinance Plan (2012-2014) ). Further details of Atlatsa’s interests in the Central Block and Rietfontein properties are given under Location and Property Description below.

4. D.19.2. Location and Property Description

The Platreef Project is located near the town of Mokopane (formerly Potgietersrust) in South Africa, approximately 275 km northeast of Johannesburg. The property holdings comprise all or parts of seventeen mineral properties, totaling 32,573 ha. The

 

67


Table of Contents

Platreef Project is divided into four geographical regions: the North Block, the Central Block, the Rietfontein Block and the South Block (Table 8 and Figure 6), further described below. The North and South Blocks fall under the Kwanda Project.

No surface rights have been secured on the properties to date. Once the required area has been established, it would be necessary to negotiate a purchase agreement with the surface rights owner(s). Prices are expected to range between ZAR2,000/ha ($294/ha) and ZAR5,000/ha ($736/ha) depending on the infrastructure required to be developed on the farms.

Figure 6. Property Holdings, Platreef Properties

 

LOGO

Prospecting or mineral rights held by Atlatsa, through Plateau Resources, including its 51% ownership of Bokoni Platinum Holdings is listed in table 10 below:

 

68


Table of Contents

Table 10. Platreef Mineral Rights

 

Property or Farm

  

Type and status of mineral rights

  

Duration of New Order prospecting right

 

Kwanda North:

 

Ham 699 LR

 

Gilead 729 LR

 

Elberfield 731 LR

 

Gideon 730 LR

 

Chlun 735 LR

 

Swerweskraal 736 LR

  

New order prospecting rights have been
granted. They are held jointly by Plateau and
RPM.

 

These apply to PGMs and extend also to
gold, silver, copper and nickel.

  

This right commenced on December 11,
2007, and endures for 5 years to
December 10, 2012.

 

Renewal applications have been submitted
on December 7, 2012, and the Company is
still awaiting the renewals (February 28,
2015)

     
     
     
     
     
     
     

 

Kwanda South:

 

Rondeboschje 295 KR

 

Cyferkuil 321 KR

 

Haakdoornkuil 323 KR

 

Vaalkop 325 KR

 

Naboomfontein 320 KR

     

This right commenced on July 23, 2008 and endures for 5 years to July 22, 2013.

 

The properties were considered unprospectable, and did not apply for the renewal of the prospecting rights.

     
     
     
     
     

 

Central Block:

 

Portion 2 of the Farm

Elandsfontein 766 LR

 

Malokongskop 780 LR

 

Portion 1 of the farm

Elandsfontein LR

 

Hamburg 737 LR

 

Portion 2 (a portion of portion 1) of Dorstland 768 LR

 

Portion 3 (a portion of portion 1) of Dorstland 768 LR

 

Noord Holland 775 LR

 

Mineral Area 1, excluding Mineral Area 2, on the Remaining Extent of Dorstland 768 LR

 

Remaining Extent of Portion 1 of

Dorstland 768 LR

  

New order prospecting rights have been granted to Plateau.

 

Dortsland and Malokongskop cover all minerals and oil and gas.

 

Noord Holland Right does not include oil and gas.

 

Portion 1 of Elandsfontein 766 LR and Hamburg 737 LR, includes all minerals.

  

Portion 2 of Elandsfontein 766 LR Portions 2, 3 and the Remaining Extent of Portion 1 and Mineral Area 1 of Dorstland 768 LR Remaining Extent and Portions 1 and 2 of Noord Holland 775 LR Portion 1 of Elandsfontein 766 LR and Hamburg 737 LR rights commenced March 20, 2007, and endure for 5 years to March 19, 2012.

 

As of March 30, 2012, renewal applications have been submitted and were received in February 2014, except for Portion 2 of the Farm Elandsfontein 766 LR.

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

Rietfontein Block:

 

Rietfontein 2 KS

  

New order prospecting right has been granted to Plateau.

 

It includes all mineral except precious stones and oil and gas.

   This right commenced on November 28, 2006 and endures for 5 years to November 27, 2011. On October 2, 2014, the initial prospecting right was extended for a further period of three years.

Notes:

 

(1) Atlatsa has continued to pay the prospecting fees for 2012 to 2015 but has not continued with any further exploration activities other than desktop studies.
(2) No mining activities are taking place on the Platreef Project. All properties are prospecting rights.
(3) No Resource or Reserve estimates have been estimated for the Platreef Project. The Platreef project is still in early stage exploration and no mineral resource estimates have been undertaken.

4. D.19.3. Rietfontein Block

Atlatsa has entered into an agreement (the “Agreement”) effective December 11, 2009 with Ivanhoe Nickel & Platinum Ltd. (“Ivanplats”) relating to the Rietfontein property located on the Northern Limb of the BIC. Salient terms of the Agreement are as follows:

 

    The existing joint operation (“JO”) between the parties is amended such that the current Rietfontein JO is extended to incorporate a defined area of Ivanplats’ adjacent Turfspruit mineral property. Both parties retain their existing prospecting rights in respect of mineral properties in their own names but make these rights and technical information available to the extended JO (“the Extended JO”).

 

69


Table of Contents
    Atlatsa will be entitled to appoint a member to the Extended JO technical committee and all technical programmes going forward will be carried out with input from Atlatsa.

 

    Atlatsa is awarded a 6% free carry interest in the Extended JO, provided that the Extended JO contemplates an open pit mining operation, incorporating the Rietfontein mineral property. Atlatsa has no financial obligations under the Extended JO terms and Ivanplats is required to fund the entire exploration programme to feasibility study with no financial recourse to Atlatsa. On delivery of the feasibility study, Atlatsa may elect to either:

 

    Retain a participating interest of 6% in the Extended JO and finance its pro rata share of the project development going forward; or

 

    Relinquish its participating interest of 6% in the Extended JO in consideration for a 5% net smelter return royalty in respect of mineral products extracted from those areas of the Rietfontein mineral property forming part of the Extended JO mineral properties.

The operation is dormant with no exploration activities currently taking place except for activities to maintain the prospecting right, which is for the cost of Ivanplats.

4. D.19.4. Central Block

The Central Block consists of five farms or portions thereof, acquired by Atlatsa, through Plateau, prior to its joint ventures with Anglo Platinum. It also includes one portion of the Dorstland farm acquired by way of an agreement with RPM. Dorstland 768LR was acquired through an agreement with Pinnacle Resources in 1999. Rights to the other farms or portions are administered by the DMR.

4. D.19.5. Kwanda Project (North Block and South Block)

On May 16, 2002, Atlatsa, through Plateau completed a joint venture agreement with RPM for the right to acquire up to an 80% interest in twelve PGM properties located on the Northern Limb of the Bushveld Complex.

As of July 1, 2009, the joint venture terminated and Kwanda Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Bokoni Holdco, owns the respective interest in and assets relating to the Kwanda Project. As a result of the completion of the Bokoni Transaction, Atlatsa effectively owns 51% of the Kwanda Project.

 

70


Table of Contents

 

ITEM 4A UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

 

71


Table of Contents

 

ITEM 5 OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

Overview

The audited Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS. The Company adopted IFRS as of January 1, 2009.

The Company incurred a net loss for Fiscal 2015 of ($369.0 million) ($31.8 million (excluding impairment loss) compared to a 2014 fiscal year loss of ($49.5 million). The loss for the year is primarily as a result of the softening in the platinum price during the 2015 financial year and the impact on profitability of the Company’s subsidiary, Bokoni Mine.

The Company’s current liabilities exceeded its current assets by $71.0 million. This deficit arises mainly as a result of the following:

 

    The $12.5 million (ZAR140 million) backlog of trade and other payables owed to RPM by Bokoni Mine. By initial agreement with RPM, the backlog of the trade and other payables was deferred and Bokoni was expected to start repaying $1.4 million (ZAR15.6 million) a month from April 2015 to December 2015. On December 9, 2015, the New Senior Facilities Agreement was increased by $6.4 million (ZAR71.4 million) to make available funds to Plateau to repay its 51% pro-rata share ($6.4 million (ZAR71.4 million)) of the backlog, subject to conditions precedent being met.

 

    RPM advanced additional funds (not supported by physical metal deliveries) on the purchase of concentrate agreement of $35.9 million (ZAR401,9 million) to secure short term funding until all conditions precedent on the Term Loan facility provided by RPM, as discussed below, had been met and this facility could be utilized to fund the Bokoni operations.

 

    The estimated costs associated with the Bokoni Restructure Plan of $9.5 million (ZAR106 million) having been provided for during the period (see ITEM 4. A.5. Refinance Plan (2012-2014)) .

 

    Atlatsa remains in discussions with RPM surrounding the future optimization of Bokoni Mine (see ITEM 4. A.4. Bokoni Restructure Plan). Atlatsa’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements; however; are prepared on the basis of accounting policies applicable to a going concern. Refer to note 2 of the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal 2015 as well as Section 1.11 “Liquidity” in the MD&A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 which was furnished on EDGAR on Form 6-K on March 30, 2016 and is specifically incorporated by references herein in its entirety.

For additional details with respect to historical exchange rates, see ITEM  3. Selected Financial Data - “Key Information”. The outlook for Atlatsa’s assets primarily relates to the outlook for platinum group metals.

Key drivers of the Company’s operating results and principle factors affecting its operating results

The principal uncertainties and variables facing the Company’s business and, therefore, the key drivers of its operating results are:

 

    The prices of PGM metals, which fluctuates in U.S. dollars and ZAR;

 

    The production tonnages and PGM content thereof, impacting on the amount of PGM metals the Company produces, at its operations;

 

    The cost of producing the PGM metals as a result of mining efficiencies;

 

    General economic factors, such as exchange rate fluctuations and inflation, and factors affecting mining operations, particularly in South Africa; and

 

    The availability of capital based on the full utilization of the facility between RPM and Plateau under the New Senior Facilities Agreement, the Advance and the Term Loan Facility as at December 31, 2015.

PGM prices

The Company’s revenues are derived primarily from the sale of PGM metals produced at the Bokoni Mine. As a result, the Company’s operating results are directly related to the prices of these PGM metals, which can fluctuate widely and are affected by numerous factors beyond the Company’s control, including industrial and jewellery demand, expectations with respect to the

 

72


Table of Contents

rate of inflation, the strength of the U.S. dollar (the currency in which the prices of the PGM metals are generally quoted) and of other currencies, interest rates, forward sales by producers, global or regional political or economic events, and production and cost levels in major PGM-producing regions such as South Africa. As a general rule, the Company sells the PGM metals produced at the market prices to obtain the maximum benefit from prevailing PGM metal prices.

The movements in the U.S. dollar PGM spot price for 2015, 2014 and 2013 are indicated in the following table:

 

Monthly average basket PGM prices

   2015 fiscal year      2014 fiscal year      % change  

Lowest PGM price during the fiscal year

   US$ 719       US$ 1,030         (30 %) 

Highest PGM price during the fiscal year

   US$ 1,125       US$ 1,281         (12 %) 

Average PGM price during the year

   US$ 925       US$ 1,164         (20 %) 

PGM price at end of the year

   US$ 781       US$ 1,071         (27 %) 

PGM price at beginning of the year

   US$ 1,071       US$ 1,124         (5 %) 

Monthly average basket PGM prices

   2014 fiscal year      2013 fiscal year      % change  

Lowest PGM price during the fiscal year

   US$ 1,030       US$ 1,075         (7 %) 

Highest PGM price during the fiscal year

   US$ 1,281       US$ 1,318         (3 %) 

Average PGM price during the year

   US$ 1,164       US$ 1,187         (2 %) 

PGM price at end of the year

   US$ 1,071       US$ 1,124         (5 %) 

PGM price at beginning of the year

   US$ 1,124       US$ 1,112         1

Source: revenue received as basis for basket price

Based on Atlatsa’s 2015 PGM production, the approximate sensitivity of its revenue to a 10% increase or decrease in the 2015 average market PGM price is a $20.6 million increase or decrease in revenue.

PGM production and operating costs

Production from the Bokoni Mine for Fiscal 2015 totaled 1,676,694 tonnes milled and 190,740 4E ounces at an average yield of 3.5. See ITEM  5. A. Operating Results for the production statistics of the Bokoni Mine.

The Company’s costs and expenses consist primarily of operating costs, royalties and depreciation. Operating costs include labour, contractor services, stores, electricity and other related costs, incurred in the production of PGM metals. Direct labour is the largest component of operating costs consisting 45% of direct operating costs at the Bokoni Mine in Fiscal 2015. Labour; broadly defined (i.e. including contractors) consists of 60% of direct operating costs.

General economic factors

The Bokoni Mine is situated in South Africa and the Company is exposed to a number of factors, which could affect its profitability, such as exchange rate fluctuations, inflation and other risks relating to South Africa. In conducting its mining operations, the Company recognizes the inherent risks and uncertainties of the industry, and the wasting nature of the assets.

Effect of exchange rate fluctuations

For Fiscal 2015, 100% of the Company’s revenues were generated from the Bokoni Mine in South Africa. During this period the U.S. dollar strengthened by 17.6% against the ZAR. As the price of PGM metals are denominated in U.S. dollars and the Company realizes its revenues in ZAR, the appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the ZAR increases the Company’s profitability, whereas the depreciation of the U.S. dollar against the ZAR reduces its profitability.

Commodities for example fuel and steel are paid for in ZAR, but the price is internationally driven in US$, as such a twofold negative impact could be taken in cost of sales, the price of the commodity rising as well as a deterioration in the ZAR exchange rate.

Currency hedging

Atlatsa does not engage in any hedging operations with respect to currency or in-situ minerals. Funds in excess of Atlatsa’s immediate needs are invested in short term near-cash investments pending the requirements for the funds. In addition, the Company has cash and certain liabilities denominated in ZAR. As a result, the Company is subject to foreign exchange risk from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. The Company has not entered into any derivative or other financial instruments to mitigate this foreign exchange risk.

 

73


Table of Contents

Effect of inflation

South Africa went through a period of increased inflation along with other world markets in 2008. The South African inflation rate stabilized in Fiscal 2009 and the CPI (“Consumer Price Inflation”) index was 4.58% in December 2015 (2014: 4.5%). The Company’s operating costs are directly impacted by inflation.

South African political, economic and other factors

The Company operates only in South Africa, and its mining activities in South Africa are subject to, amongst others, the following laws and regulations:

 

    The Broad-based Black Economic Empowerment Act;

 

    The Minerals Act;

 

    The MPRDA;

 

    The Royalties Act.

The Company is also subject to various local, national and regional safety, health and environmental laws and regulations. See ITEM 3.D Risk Factors and ITEM  4. B. Business Overview for a detailed discussion on the political, economic and other factors affecting South African companies.

 

74


Table of Contents

5. A. Operating Results

 

Consolidated Statements of Financial Position

   As at
December 31,
2015
     As at
December 31,
2014
     As at
December 31,
2013
 

Total assets

   $ 326,387,522       $ 720,824,611       $ 773,629,408   

Non-current liabilities (including short-term portion of loans and borrowings)

   $ 227,467,468       $ 261,313,182       $ 322,636,481   

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

   Year ended
December 31,
2015
     Year ended
December 31,
2014
     Year ended
December 31,
2013
 

Revenue

   $ 205,690,922       $ 237,390,814       $ 195,621,452   

Cost of sales

   ($ 260,574,210    ($ 264,758,202    ($ 233,776,296
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Gross loss

   ($ 54,883,288    ($ 27,367,388    ($ 38,154,844
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
        
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

(Loss) / profit for the year

   ($ 368,981,738    ($ 49,549,842    $ 99,869,277   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Basic (loss) / profit per share

   ($ 0.30    ($ 0.05    $ 0.47   

Diluted (loss) / profit per share

   ($ 0.30    ($ 0.05    $ 0.46   

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding 1

     553,808,838         541,956,940         426,290,432   

Diluted weighted number of common shares outstanding (million) 2

     553,808,838         541,956,940         429,288,473   

 

1 On a fully diluted basis, post-conversion of the “B” Preference Shares.
2 Including unvested treasury shares issued pursuant to the Company’s Employee Stock Option Plan.

With effect from July 1, 2009, Atlatsa transformed from an exploration and development company into a PGM producer as detailed in Atlatsa’s Amended Business Acquisition Report, dated September 28, 2010 (furnished to the SEC on Form 6-K on February 1, 2011). This transformation was achieved through the Bokoni Transaction. The Bokoni Transaction is discussed in detail in ITEM 4.A.

Highlights

5. A.1. Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

5. A.1.1. Fiscal 2015 compared to Fiscal 2014

The following are the key changes in financial conditions for Fiscal 2015 compared to Fiscal 2014:

 

    Atlatsa’s total assets decreased by ($394.4 million) (-54.7%) from $720.8 million at December 31, 2014 to $326.4 million at December 31, 2015. This decrease in total assets is primarily due to the following:

 

    an impairment loss of ($337.1 million) (converted at June 30, 2015 ruling exchange rates) recognized against the property, plant and equipment during Fiscal 2015;

 

    a decrease of ($4.7 million) in cash and cash equivalents;

 

    a decrease of ($10.0 million) in trade and other receivables during Fiscal 2015 as a result of the impact of utilizing the Advance; and

 

    a deterioration of (12.3%) of the ZAR against the $ since December 31, 2014.

 

    Atlatsa’s total liabilities decreased by ($31.8 million) (-10.4%) from $305.6 million at December 31, 2014 to $273.6 million at December 31, 2015. This decrease in total liabilities is primarily due to the following:

 

    a decrease in the deferred tax liability at acquisition (July 1, 2009) due to the impairment loss recognized at Bokoni Mine;

 

    a decrease of ($16.9 million) in the effect of translation of the loans and borrowings.

 

75


Table of Contents

These decreases were partially offset by:

 

    additional funds (not supported by physical metal deliveries) advanced by RPM, on the purchase of concentrate agreement of $35.9 million (ZAR401.9 million); and

 

    a net increase in the Company’s loans and borrowings (non-current and current) resulting mainly from the advance on the Working Capital Facility of $3.1 million and accrued interest capitalized of $2.6 million more in Fiscal 2015 than in Fiscal 2014.

5. A.1.2. Fiscal 2014 compared to Fiscal 2013

The following are the key changes in financial condition for Fiscal 2014 compared to Fiscal 2013:

 

    Atlatsa’s total assets decreased by ($52.8 million) (-6.8%) from $773.6 million at December 31, 2013 to $720.8 million at December 31, 2014. This decrease in total assets is primarily due to the following:

 

    a decrease of ($32.5 million) in cash and cash equivalents mainly due to the payment during Fiscal 2014 of the Value Added Tax (“VAT”) liability on the sale of the mineral properties of Boikgantsho and Eastern Ga-Phasha on December 13, 2013;

 

    a decrease of ($17.5 million) in trade and other receivables as a result of the impact of utilizing the Advance; and

 

    a deterioration of (0.8%) of the ZAR against the $ since December 31, 2013.

These decreases were partially offset by additions to capital work-in-progress of $2.0 million and an increase in inventory of $0.4 million mainly as a result of the increase in the opencast stockpile, not milled at year-end.

 

    Atlatsa’s total liabilities decreased by ($88.9 million) (-22.5%) from $394.5 million at December 31, 2013 to $305.6 million at December 31, 2014. This decrease in total liabilities is primarily due to the following:

 

    a decrease of ($30.2 million) in trade and other payables mainly as a result of the VAT incurred on the sale of the mineral properties of Boikgantsho and Eastern Ga-Phasha on December 13, 2013 being paid after December 31, 2013 and during Fiscal 2014;

 

    a net decrease in the Company’s loans and borrowings (non-current and current) of ($56.1 million) resulting mainly from $74.8 million (ZAR750.0 million – converted at transaction date: January 31, 2014) being repaid on the New Senior Facilities Agreement in Q1 2014 as part of the Restructure Plan (this was disclosed as short-term portion of loans and borrowings at December 31, 2013), additional drawdowns of $2.4 million, shareholder loans capitalized of $12.5 million and accrued interest capitalized of $17.0 million;

 

    a decrease in deferred tax of ($7.8 million); and

 

    a deterioration of (0.8%) of the ZAR against the $ since December 31, 2013.

5. A.2. Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

5. A.2.1. Fiscal 2015 compared to Fiscal 2014

 

    Atlatsa incurred a gross loss for Fiscal 2015 of ($54.9 million); which is $27.5 million more than the gross loss incurred in Fiscal 2014 of ($27.4 million).

 

    Atlatsa incurred an operating loss of ($416.2 million) and a loss before tax of ($439.9 million) for Fiscal 2015, compared to an operating loss of ($40.1 million) and loss before tax of ($56.1 million) for Fiscal 2014. This is mainly due to the impairment loss and the cost of restructuring at Bokoni recognized during the year as discussed below. Additionally the significant items are listed below:

 

    Due to the economic climate and the significant re-rate in forecasted metal prices, the Company tested the carrying value of its assets for impairment and recognized an impairment loss of ($337.1 million) at 30 June 2015 (converted at June 30, 2015 ruling exchange rates). Goodwill has been written down to zero.

 

76


Table of Contents
    The Company incurred ($14.9 million) in the year under review with regards to the estimated costs associated with a significant labour restructuring, legal, human resources and security related charges. Refer note 25 of the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended 2015 and ITEM 4. A.4. Bokoni Restructure Plan .

 

    The Company has recognized a fair value loss and AG8 adjustments of ($0.3 million) in its Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for Fiscal 2015, compared to a fair value loss and AG8 adjustments of ($2.1 million) for Fiscal 2014.

 

    The net loss (after tax) was ($369.0 million) for Fiscal 2015 as compared to a net loss (after tax) of ($49.5 million) for Fiscal 2014.

 

    The basic and diluted loss per share was ($0.30) for Fiscal 2015 as compared to the basic and diluted loss per share for Fiscal 2014 of ($0.05). The basic and diluted loss per share is based on the loss attributable to the shareholders of the Company of ($167.1 million) for Fiscal 2015 as compared to the loss attributable to the shareholders of the Company of ($24.6 million) for Fiscal 2014.

 

    During Fiscal 2015, the Bokoni Mine produced 190,740 platinum, palladium, rhodium and gold (“4E”) ounces as compared to 194,036 4E ounces during Fiscal 2014. The decrease is mainly attributable to the decrease in production tonnes milled. The UM2 and Vertical Merensky shaft operations were placed on care and maintenance in August and December 2015, respectively. To illustrate the impact of these two shafts not producing in Q4 2015, see ITEM 4. D.13. Production History – table 6.

The major contributors to the increase in a loss of by $324.4 million for Fiscal 2015 are described below under Item 5. A.2.1.1 to 5. A2.1.9:

5. A.2.1.1. Revenue

The Company has two reportable segments under IFRS: the Bokoni Mine and the Projects. All external revenue of the Company is generated by the Bokoni Mine segment. The Projects segment generated no revenue.

Revenue was $205.7 million (ZAR2,046.7 million) for Fiscal 2015 compared to $237.4 million (ZAR2,329.6 million) for Fiscal 2014 representing a (13.4%) decrease in $ terms and a (12.1%) decrease in ZAR terms as a result of the following:

 

    4E ounces produced decreased by (1.7%) to 190,740 in Fiscal 2015 when compared to Fiscal 2014 of 194,036 4E ounces. The decrease is mainly attributable to the decrease in production tonnes milled. The decrease is mainly attributable to the decrease in production tonnes milled. The UM2 and Vertical Merensky shaft operations were placed on care and maintenance in August and December 2015, respectively. To illustrate the impact of these two shafts not producing in Q4 2015, see ITEM 4. D.13. Production History – table 6 ;

 

    The 4E basket price for Fiscal 2015 was (10.6%) lower at ZAR10,730 compared to ZAR12,006 for Fiscal 2014;

 

    The average platinum price of US$1,054 during Fiscal 2015 was (23.9%) lower when compared to the average of Fiscal 2014 of US$1,385; and

 

    The average realized ZAR/US$ exchange rate for Fiscal 2015 was ZAR12.76 compared to the average realized exchange rate of ZAR10.85 for Fiscal 2014 representing a (17.6%) weakening of the ZAR.

5. A.2.1.2. Cost of Sales

Consolidated cost of sales for Fiscal 2015 was $260.6 million (ZAR2,605.9 million) which is $4.2 million (ZAR7.7 million) less than Fiscal 2014 $264.8 million (ZAR2,598.2 million). This represents a decrease of (1.6%) in $ terms and an increase of 0.3% in ZAR terms.

The main contributors to the cost variances were:

 

    Labour costs for Fiscal 2015 were $100.2 million (ZAR997.0 million), which is an increase of 3.7% in $ terms and 3.0% in ZAR terms, compared to Fiscal 2014 labour costs of $96.6 million (ZAR968.0 million). The increase in labour costs was mainly due to the average annual salary increases from July 2015.

This is partially offset by the Restructuring Plan being implemented at Bokoni, with a number of employees taking voluntary severance packages during Q4 2015.

 

77


Table of Contents
    Contractor costs for Fiscal 2015 were $34.2 million (ZAR339.8 million), which is a decrease of (17.6%) in $ terms and (16.5%) in ZAR terms compared to Fiscal 2014 contractor costs of $41.5 million (ZAR406.8 million). The decrease was due to:

 

    the opencast tonnes delivered decreased by (21.6%), and the contractor is paid per tonne delivered;

 

    this is partially offset by the higher stripping ratio (the volume of overburden (or waste material) required to be handled in order to extract some volume of ore), which entailed more costs to remove the tonnes at the opencast; and

 

    the Restructure Plan being implemented at Bokoni, which led to the retrenchment of certain contractors.

 

    Stores costs for Fiscal 2015 were $43.3 million (ZAR430.6 million), which is a decrease of (2.7%) in $ terms and (1.4%) in ZAR terms compared to Fiscal 2014 store costs of $44.5 million (ZAR436.6 million). The decrease was mainly due to a decrease of (1.0%) in square meters and (28.9%) in working cost development, as compared to Fiscal 2014.

 

    Utility costs for Fiscal 2015 were $15.8 million (ZAR157.4 million), which is an increase of 3.0% in $ terms and 4.5% in ZAR terms compared to Fiscal 2014 utility costs of $15.4 million (ZAR150.7 million). This increase was mainly due to Eskom Holdings (“Eskom”) rate increase of 12.7% (applicable from April 2015). Due to the Megaflex paying system, Eskom’s rate (Cost/kWh) changes depending on time of usage, i.e. during peak times, utilities will cost more. This is partially offset by the decrease of (3.6%) in tonnes delivered.

 

    Sundry costs for Fiscal 2015 were $29.5 million (ZAR293.4 million), which is an increase of 4.5% in $ terms and 5.9% in ZAR terms compared to Fiscal 2014 sundry costs of $28.2 million (ZAR277.0 million). This increase was mainly due to an increase in costs to third party suppliers associated with the transfer of tonnes to the concentrator and waste areas in line with a corresponding increase in underground production. The decrease is mainly attributable to the decrease in production tonnes milled. The UM2 and Vertical Merensky shaft operations were placed on care and maintenance in August and December 2015, respectively. To illustrate the impact of these two shafts not producing in Q4 2015, see ITEM 4. D.13. Production History – table 6 .

Cost per tonne milled for Fiscal 2015 was $133 (ZAR1,323) compared to $131 (ZAR1,284) in Fiscal 2014. This represents an increase of 1.6 $ terms and an increase of 3.0% in ZAR terms.

Cost per 4E ounce for Fiscal 2015 was $1,169 (ZAR11,630 as compared to $1,176 (ZAR11,540) in Fiscal 2014. This represents a decrease of (0.6%) in $ terms and an increase of 0.8% in ZAR terms.

5. A.2.1.3. Exchange Rate

For presentation purposes in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for Fiscal 2015, currencies of the South African subsidiaries are converted from ZAR to $. The average ZAR to $ exchange rate for Fiscal 2015 was ZAR9.95=$1. This represents a weakening of (1.4%) compared to the average exchange rate for Fiscal 2014 of ZAR9.81=$1.

For the Statement of Financial Position for Fiscal 2015, the closing ZAR to $ exchange rate for Fiscal 2015 was ZAR11.18=$1, representing a weakening of (12.3%) as compared to the closing exchange rate at December 31, 2014 of ZAR9.95=$1.

5. A.2.1.4. Finance Costs

The last cash drawdowns of $10.8 million (ZAR120.3 million) under the New Senior Facilities Agreement took place in 2014, thereafter the facility was fully utilized by March 31, 2014. No drawdowns took place during Fiscal 2015 under this facility.

See ITEM  4. A.6.8. Purchase of Concentrate Advance for the Advances during Fiscal 2015.

The finance costs for Fiscal 2015 were $23.9 million (ZAR243.0 million) compared to $16.3 million (ZAR165.3 million) in Fiscal 2014, which is an increase of 46.8% in $ terms due to a fully drawn New Senior Facilities Agreement, as well as finance costs on the Working Capital Facility and the Advance.

The finance costs are net of capitalized interest of $3.2 million (ZAR31.2 million) capitalized in Fiscal 2014 compared to $0.8 million (ZAR7.6 million) in Fiscal 2015.

Pursuant to the terms of the New Senior Facilities Agreement, the interest on outstanding amounts under the New Senior Facilities Agreement is calculated on the method set out below:

 

78


Table of Contents

Total Facility Outstanding

  2014   2015   2016   2017   2018

Up to ZAR1,000,000,000

  Zero interest   JIBAR minus
5.14%
  JIBAR minus
3.11%
  JIBAR minus
0.96%
  JIBAR plus
1.30%

From (and including) ZAR1,000,000,000 up to ZAR1,550,000,000

  JIBAR plus
3.02%
  JIBAR plus
2.36%
  JIBAR plus
4.39%
  JIBAR plus
6.54%
  JIBAR plus
6.30%

From (and including) ZAR1,550,000,000

  JIBAR plus
8.02%
  JIBAR plus
7.36%
  JIBAR plus
11.89%
  JIBAR plus
11.54%
  JIBAR plus
11.30%

The interest applicable on the contractual amount outstanding between Plateau and RPM under the New Senior Facilities Agreement is based on the corresponding tranche of the outstanding amount and the calendar year. See Section  1.12 – “Capital Resources” in the MD&A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, which was furnished on EDGAR on Form 6-K on March 30, 2016 and is specifically incorporated by references herein in its entirety. For accounting purposes, interest is recorded at a calculated effective interest rate. The outstanding amounts under the New Senior Facilities Agreement have an effective floating interest rate of JIBAR plus 8% for Fiscal 2015.

5. A.2.1.5. Income Tax Expense

In Fiscal 2015, an Income Tax income of $70.9 million (Fiscal 2014 - $6.5 million income) was recorded relating to a deferred tax asset, as the deferred tax liability at acquisition (July 1, 2009) was reduced, due to the impairment loss recognized at Bokoni Mine. Refer to note 22 in the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal 2015.

5. A.2.1.6. Safety

Atlatsa’s LTIFR in Fiscal 2015 of 1.10 has detoriated by (12.2%) when compared to the Fiscal 2014 LTIFR of 0.98. Nineteen (19) Section 54 stoppages were imposed by the DMR during Fiscal 2015 compared to 16 stoppages in Fiscal 2014. This equates to 3,280 4E ounces lost in Fiscal 2015, and 1,622 4E ounces lost in Fiscal 2014.

The following Section 54 stoppages were encountered during Fiscal 2015 compared to Fiscal 2014.

 

     Shafts stopped      Sections stopped      4E ounces lost  

2015

     11         9         3,280   

2014

     5         11         1,622   

In Fiscal 2015 more shafts were stopped than sections as safety is currently a priority. A section is a smaller area; each shaft may have 4 or 5 sections.

On October 8, 2014, Bokoni suspended operations at its Klipfontein opencast mine pending the outcome of an urgent and full investigation into the fatal injury of a Motsotsi community member. The Bokoni Mine resumed operations on the western side of the Klipfontein opencast on November 3, 2014. The eastern side of the opencast mine remains suspended pending finalization of the investigation by the DMR and the South African Police Services. As of the date hereof, the eastern side of the opencast mine still remains closed.

Management at the Bokoni Mine has engaged extensively with the safety authorities at the DMR and has taken action to mitigate against future incidents at the Bokoni Mine. Additional emphasis has been placed on behavior, including in-depth discussions with employees before each shift to identify any risks.

5. A.2.1.7. Capital

Total capital expenditure for Fiscal 2015 was $25.7 million (ZAR255.6 million) (compared to $31.1 million (ZAR344.1 million) for Fiscal 2014); comprising 35% sustaining capital and 65% project expansion capital (compared to 29% sustaining capital and 71% project expansion capital for Fiscal 2014). The decrease in capital expenditure is due to cash preservation strategies without having an impact on the mine’s future development plans.

5. A.2.1.8. Royalties

See ITEM  4. D.16. Tax and Royalties.

 

79


Table of Contents

5. A.2.1.9. Power Tariff Increases

See ITEM  4. D.14.1. Power .

5. A.2.2. Fiscal 2014 compared to Fiscal 2013

 

    Atlatsa incurred a gross loss for Fiscal 2014 of ($27.4 million), which is $10.8 million less than the gross loss incurred in Fiscal 2013 of ($38.2 million).

 

    Atlatsa had an operating loss of ($40.1 million) and a loss before tax of ($56.1million) for Fiscal 2014, compared to an operating profit of $159.8 million and profit before tax of $103.7 million for Fiscal 2013. This is mainly due to the profit of $171.1 million, on the sale of Boikgantsho and Eastern Ga-Phasha, as part of the Restructure Plan in Fiscal 2013.

 

    The net loss (after tax) was ($49.5 million) for Fiscal 2014 as compared to a net profit (after tax) of $99.9 million for Fiscal 2013.

 

    The Company has recognized a fair value loss and AG8 adjustments of ($2.1 million) in its Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for Fiscal 2014, compared to a fair value gain and AG8 adjustments of $48.0 million for Fiscal 2013. The difference is due to the refinancing cash flow implications being moved out as a result of the delay in finalization of the Restructure Plan during Fiscal 2013. In addition to this, post December 13, 2013, only the debt between Plateau and RPM was fair valued, as the 49% contribution by RPM to Bokoni Holdco was treated as a shareholders loan with the intention to capitalize these loans, which took place on March 31, 2014.

 

    The basic and diluted loss per share was ($0.05) for Fiscal 2014 as compared to the basic earnings per share for Fiscal 2013 of $0.47 and the diluted earnings per share for Fiscal 2013 of $0.46. The basic and diluted loss per share is based on the loss attributable to the shareholders of the Company of ($24.6 million) for Fiscal 2014 as compared to the profit attributable to the shareholders of the Company of $199.5 million for Fiscal 2013.

 

    During Fiscal 2014, the Bokoni Mine produced 194,036 platinum, palladium, rhodium and gold (“4E”) ounces as compared to 170,295 4E ounces during Fiscal 2013. The increase is mainly attributable to the increase in production tonnes mined.

The major contributors to the increase in a loss of by $149.4 million for Fiscal 2014 are described below under Item 5. A.2.2.1 to 5. A2.1.7:

5. A.2.2.1. Revenue

The Company has two reportable segments under IFRS: the Bokoni Mine and the Projects. All external revenue of the Company is generated by the Bokoni Mine segment.

 

    The Bokoni concentrator milled 1,458,312 underground tonnes during Fiscal 2014, which was 11.1% higher than the 1,312,631 underground tonnes milled during Fiscal 2013.

 

    The Klipfontein opencast milled 285,469 tonnes during Fiscal 2014, which is 33.8% more than the 213,314 underground tonnes milled during Fiscal 2013.

 

    Total tonnes milled for Fiscal 2014 was 1,743,781 tonnes, which is 14.3% more than the 1,525,945 total tonnes milled for Fiscal 2013.

 

    The Bokoni Mine produced 174,361 underground 4E ounces during Fiscal 2014, which is 11.4% more than the 156,578 4E ounces produced during Fiscal 2013.

 

    The Merensky opencast produced 19,675 4E ounces in Fiscal 2014, which is 43.4% more than the 13,717 4E ounces produced in Fiscal 2013.

Revenue was $237.4 million (ZAR2,329.6 million) for Fiscal 2014 compared to $195.6 million (ZAR1,828.2 million) for Fiscal 2013 representing a 21.4% increase as a result of the following:

 

    4E ounces produced increased by 13.9% from 170,295 ounces in Fiscal 2013 to 194,036 ounces in Fiscal 2014.

 

    The 4E basket price for Fiscal 2014 was 11.8% higher at ZAR12,006 compared to ZAR10,736 for Fiscal 2013; however, in Fiscal 2014, the US$ average basket price was US$1,107 compared to US$1,112 in Fiscal 2013, representing a marginal decrease of 0.5%.

 

80


Table of Contents

The average realized ZAR/US$ exchange rate for Fiscal 2014 was ZAR10.85 compared to the average realized exchange rate of ZAR9.65 for Fiscal 2013 representing a 12.4% weakening of the ZAR.

5. A.2.2.2. Cost of sales

Consolidated cost of sales for Fiscal 2014 was $264.8 million (ZAR2,598.2 million) which is $31.0 million (ZAR403.3 million) more than Fiscal 2013 ($233.8 million (ZAR2,195.0 million). This represents an increase of 13.3% in $ terms and 18.4% in ZAR terms.

The main contributors to the cost variances were:

 

    Labour costs for Fiscal 2014 were $96.6 million (ZAR968.0 million), which is an increase of 10.8% in $ terms and 16.3% in ZAR terms, compared to Fiscal 2013 labour costs of $89.0 million (ZAR832.1 million). The increase in labour costs was mainly due to:

 

    the average annual salary increases from July 2014;

 

    increase in labour heads (28 extra employees); and

 

    increase in bonus payments due to higher production (tonnes delivered increased by 14.5%).

 

    Contractor costs for Fiscal 2014 were $41.5 million (ZAR406.8 million), which is an increase of 42.2% in $ terms and 49.3% in ZAR terms compared to Fiscal 2013 contractor costs of $29.2 million (ZAR272.5 million). The increase was due to:

 

    the opencast tonnes delivered increased by 31.3%, and the contractor is paid per tonne delivered;

 

    the opencast is also mining with a higher stripping ratio (the volume of overburden (or waste material) required to be handled in order to extract some volume of ore), which entailed more costs to remove the tonnes; and

 

    increase in working cost primary development, re-development, and ledging. Square meters increased 12.7% (263,127 m2 compared to 233,414 m2), while working cost development increased 19.0% (25,583m compared to 21,500m) and the contractors are paid on output-based (i.e. payment per meter worked). The majority of the working cost development was completed at the Brakfontein shaft.

 

    Stores costs for Fiscal 2014 were $44.5 million (ZAR436.6 million), which is an increase of 13.9% in $ terms and 19.6% in ZAR terms compared to Fiscal 2013 store costs of $39.1 million (ZAR365.1 million). The increase was mainly due to an increase of 12.7% in square meters and 19.0% in working cost development, as compared to Fiscal 2013.

 

    Utility costs for Fiscal 2014 were $15.4 million (ZAR150.7 million), which is an increase of 10.0% in $ terms and 15.5% in ZAR terms compared to Fiscal 2013 utility costs of $14.0 million (ZAR130.5 million). This increase was mainly due to an increase of 14.5% in tonnes delivered and Eskom rate increase of 8% (applicable from April 2014). Due to the Megaflex paying system, Eskom’s rate (Cost/kWh) changes depending on time of usage, i.e. during peak times, utilities will cost more.

 

    Sundry costs for Fiscal 2014 were $28.2 million (ZAR277.0 million), which is an increase of 24.0% in $ terms and 30.2% in ZAR terms compared to Fiscal 2013 sundry costs of $22.8 million (ZAR212.8 million). This increase was mainly due to:

 

    an increase of 40% in the cost of maintenance and spare parts relating to specific drilling machinery purchased during Fiscal 2013 used by the Brakfontein shaft. Prior to purchasing the machinery, a rental contract was in place, which included the maintenance of the machinery. After purchasing the machinery, the Bokoni Mine is now responsible for the maintenance and servicing of the machinery. As a result, the Bokoni Mine has created its own repair facility. Parts are still sourced from the vendor but at a premium; and

 

    an increase in costs to third party suppliers associated with the transfer of tonnes to the concentrator and waste areas in line with a corresponding increase in production.

Cost per tonne milled for Fiscal 2014 was $131 (ZAR1,284) to $128 (ZAR1,197) in Fiscal 2013. This represents an increase of 2.1% in $ terms and an increase of 7.2% in ZAR terms.

 

81


Table of Contents

Cost per 4E ounce for Fiscal 2014 was $1,176 (ZAR11,540) as compared to $1,148 (ZAR10,728) in Fiscal 2013. This represents an increase of 2.4% in $ terms and an increase of 7.6% in ZAR terms.

5. A.2.2.3. Exchange rate

For presentation purposes in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for Fiscal 2014, currencies of the South African subsidiaries are converted from ZAR to $. The average ZAR to $ exchange rate for Fiscal 2014 was ZAR9.81=$1. This represents a weakening of 5.0% compared to the average exchange rate for Fiscal 2013 of ZAR9.35=$1.

For the Statement of Financial Position for Fiscal 2014, the closing ZAR to $ exchange rate for Fiscal 2014 was ZAR9.95=$1. This represents a weakening of 0.8% compared to the closing exchange rate for Fiscal 2013 of ZAR9.87=$1.

5. A.2.2.4. Finance expenses

There were only cash drawdowns of $12.6 million (ZAR120.3 million) under the New Senior Facilities Agreement in Q1 2014 as the facility had been fully utilized by March 31, 2014; compared to $69.2 million (ZAR644.1 million) in drawdowns for Bokoni during Fiscal 2013. $6.7 million (ZAR65.8 million) for the capital gains tax that was payable on the sale of the Eastern section of Ga-Phasha was separately drawn down in Q4 2013.

The finance costs for Fiscal 2014 were $16.3 million (ZAR165.3 million) compared to $56.4 million (ZAR517.8 million) in Fiscal 2013, which is a decrease of 71.1%. The higher finance costs in Fiscal 2013 were as a result of the delay in the finalization of the Restructure Plan. See ITEM  4. A.5. Refinance Plan (2012-2014) and 4. A.6.6.New Senior Facilities Agreement.

The finance costs are net of capitalized interest of $3.2 million (ZAR31.2 million) capitalized in Fiscal 2014 compared to $1.5 million (ZAR14.0 million) capitalized in Fiscal 2013.

Pursuant to the terms of the New Senior Facilities Agreement; the interest on outstanding amounts under the New Senior Facilities Agreement is calculated on the method set out below:

 

Total Facility Outstanding

   2014   2015   2016   2017   2018

Up to ZAR1,000,000,000

   Zero interest   JIBAR minus
5.14%
  JIBAR minus
3.11%
  JIBAR minus
0.96%
  JIBAR plus
1.30%

From (and including) ZAR1,000,000,000 up to ZAR1,550,000,000

   JIBAR plus
3.02%
  JIBAR plus
2.36%
  JIBAR plus
4.39%
  JIBAR plus
6.54%
  JIBAR plus
6.30%

From (and including) ZAR1,550,000,000

   JIBAR plus
8.02%
  JIBAR plus
7.36%
  JIBAR plus
11.89%
  JIBAR plus
11.54%
  JIBAR plus
11.30%

On January 31, 2014, Atlatsa used the proceeds of $74.8 million (ZAR750.0 million converted at transaction date) from RPM’s subscription for 125 million Common Shares in the Company to reduce the amount outstanding between Plateau and RPM under the New Senior Facilities Agreement to $155.8 million (ZAR1,550 million); this becoming the amended maximum available under this facility. Due to this part of the transaction, the tranches were different for January 2014 and Fiscal 2013:

 

Total Facility Outstanding

  2013   2014   2015   2016   2017   2018

Up to ZAR1,000,000,000

  zero interest   zero interest   JIBAR minus
5.14%
  JIBAR minus
3.11%
  JIBAR minus
0.96%
  JIBAR plus
1.30%

From (and including) ZAR1,000,000,000 up to ZAR2,000,000,000

  JIBAR minus
1.25%
  JIBAR plus
3.02%
  JIBAR plus
2.36%
  JIBAR plus
4.39%
  JIBAR plus
6.54%
  JIBAR plus
6.30%

From (and including) ZAR2,000,000,000

  JIBAR plus
8.75%
  JIBAR plus
8.02%
  JIBAR plus
7.36%
  JIBAR plus
11.89%
  JIBAR plus
11.54%
  JIBAR plus
11.30%

The interest applicable on the contractual amount outstanding between Plateau and RPM under the New Senior Facilities Agreement is based on the corresponding tranche of the outstanding amount and the calendar year. For accounting purposes,

 

82


Table of Contents

interest is recorded at a calculated effective interest rate. The outstanding amounts under the New Senior Facilities Agreement have an effective floating interest rate of JIBAR plus 8% for Fiscal 2014.

See ITEM 4. A.5. Refinance Plan (2012-2014) and 4. A.6.6.New Senior Facilities Agreement.

5. A.2.2.5. Income Tax Expense

In 2013, a portion of the tax expense related to capital gains tax paid on the sale of Eastern Ga-Phasha. Taxable losses and deductible expenditure incurred by Bokoni in Fiscal 2013, together with related deferred tax on the fair value of Bokoni’s loans resulted in a reduction in the deferred tax liabilities during the year, therefore lowering the income tax expense. In Fiscal 2014, an Income Tax income of $6.5 million (Fiscal 2013 - $3.9 million expense) was recorded based on deferred tax income that arose as a result of the reversal of temporary differences. Refer to note 34 in the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal 2014.

5. A.2.1.6. Safety

Atlatsa’s LTIFR in Fiscal 2014 of 0.98 represented a deterioration of 8.9% compared to the LTIFR of 0.90 for Fiscal 2013. The disappointing safety performance was largely attributable to non-adherence to safety standards and procedures by new contractors at the mine. Additional emphasis is being placed on behavior including in-depth discussions with employees prior to each shift.

The following Section 54 stoppages were encountered during Fiscal 2014 compared to Fiscal 2013.

 

     Shafts stopped      Sections stopped      Days lost      4E ounces lost  

2014

     5         11         56         1,622   

2013

     5         3         18         1,411   

More days were lost in Fiscal 2014, based on more Section 54’s than in Fiscal 2013. In Fiscal 2014; more sections were stopped than shafts as safety is currently a priority. A section is a smaller area; each shaft might have 4 or 5 sections.

On October 8, 2014, Bokoni suspended operations at its Klipfontein opencast mine pending the outcome of an urgent and full investigation into the fatal injury of a Mosotsi community member. Safety of Bokoni’s employees and community members remains of paramount importance to the Company. Operations and mine management at Bokoni are working closely with the SAPS, the DMR and other authorities involved in the investigation of the fatality. The Company notes with regret that after the fatal injury, members of the local community set fire to community and contractor mining property, plant and equipment, causing significant damage. This incident was investigated by the SAPS, and there is ongoing community engagement to resolve any resulting issues. Bokoni resumed operations on the western side of the Klipfontein opencast on November 3, 2014. The eastern side of the opencast remains suspended pending finalization of the investigation by the DMR and the SAPS. The eastern side remained closed as investigations are still taking place. The DMR has scheduled an inquiry for 13-15 April 2015. The impact of this closure resulted in 78,136 tpm and 5,763 4E oz decrease in production scheduled in Q4 2014.

Management at the Bokoni Mine has engaged extensively with the safety authorities at the DMR and has taken action to mitigate against future incidents at the Bokoni Mine. Additional emphasis has been placed on behavior, including in-depth discussions with employees before each shift to identify any risks.

5. A.2.2.6. Capital

Total capital expenditure for Fiscal 2014 was $35.1 million (ZAR344.1 million) (compared to $51.2 million (ZAR479.1 million) for Fiscal 2013); comprising 29% sustaining capital and 71% project expansion capital (compared to 32% sustaining capital and 68% project expansion capital for Fiscal 2013). This 32.4% decrease in capital expenditure from Fiscal 2013 to Fiscal 2014 is as a result of a strategic decision by management to reduce costs.

5. A.2.2.7. Royalties: Implementation of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Royalty Act, 2008 (Act no. 28 of 2008)

See ITEM  4. D.16. Tax and Royalties.

The Fiscal 2014 royalty tax percentage and resulting royalty expenses for the Bokoni Mine were 0.5% and $1.0 million (ZAR10.4 million), respectively, representing the minimum rates. The royalty tax percentage and royalty expenses for Fiscal 2013 were 0.5% and $0.8 million (ZAR8.4 million), respectively.

 

83


Table of Contents

5. A. 3. Bokoni Mine production statistics

 

        Fiscal
2015
(Total )
    Fiscal
2015
(opencast)
    Fiscal
2015
(underground)
    Fiscal
2014
(Total)
    Fiscal
2014
(opencast)
    Fiscal
2014
(underground)
    %
Change between
Fiscal 2015
(total) and Fiscal
2014

(total)
 

4E oz produced

  Oz     190,740        15,766        174,973        194,036        19,675        174,361        (1.7 %) 

Tonnes delivered

  T     1,681,656        223,953        1,457,704        1,745,245        289,151        1,456,094        (3.6 %) 

Tonnes milled

  T     1,676,694        219,495        1,457,199        1,743,781        285,469        1,458,312        (3.8 %) 

Recovered grade

  g/t milled,
4E
    3.5        2.2        3.7        3.6        2.10        3.89        (1.2 %) 

UG2 mined to underground output

  %     30.0         27.60            8.7

Development meters

  M     7,778            10,735            (27.5 %) 

Operating cost/tonne milled

  ZAR/t     1,301        569        1,412        1,284        653        1,407        1.3

Operating cost/4E oz

  ZAR/4E oz     11,441        7,928        11,758        11,540        9,481        11,772        (0.9 %) 
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total permanent labour (mine operations)

  Number     3,477            3,634         (4.3 %) 
   

 

 

       

 

 

       

 

 

 

Total contractors (mine operations)

  Number     2,134            2,467         (13.5 %) 
   

 

 

       

 

 

       

 

 

 

 

* 2014 restated by using the actual at reporting date

5. A. 4. Summary of Quarterly Results

 

$ Million

   Dec 31,
2015
    Sept 30,
2015
    Jun 30,
2015
    Mar 31,
2015
    Dec 31,
2014
    Sept 30,
2014
    Jun 30,
2014
    Mar 31,
2014
 

Revenue

     44.5        57.2        51.7        52.3        54.6        70.4        58.6        53.8   

Cost of sales

     (66.1     (65.0     (66.1     (63.4     (71.4     (66.7     (65.7     (61.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross loss

     (21.6     (7.8     (14.4     (11.1     (16.8     3.7        (7.2     (7.1
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss)/Profit for the period

     (17.7     (37.4     (297.1     (16.8     (24.2     (0.6     (12     (12.8

Basic (loss)/profit per share ($)

     (0.02     (0.04     (0.23     (0.02     (0.02     (0.00     (0.01     (0.01

Diluted (loss)/profit per share ($)

     (0.02     (0.04     (0.23     (0.02     (0.02     (0.00     (0.01     (0.01
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted number of Common Shares outstanding (million) 1

     554        554        554        553        542        593        531        551   

Diluted weighted number of Common Shares outstanding (million) 2

     554        554        554        553        542        593        531        554   

 

1 On a fully diluted basis, post-conversion of the “B” Preference Shares.
2 Including unvested treasury shares issued pursuant to the Company’s Employee Stock Option Plan.

Discussion of Last Eight Quarterly Results

Atlatsa is continuing its efforts to increase production in order to achieve its medium-term monthly production target rate of 160.0 ktpm.

Revenue increased to a high of $70.4 million for Q3 2014 from an all-time low of $44.5 million in Q4 2015. Fluctuations in revenue between the quarters were largely due to the following fluctuations in production, varying PGM basket prices and exchange rates:

 

   

Production has varied between periods due to production efficiencies, potholing and safety stoppages. Revenue is also impacted by concentrate grade and chrome penalties. Production levels reached a high of 56,025 4E ounces during Q3

 

84


Table of Contents
 

2014 and a low of 42,820 4E ounces during Q1 2014. The extent of this variance (30.8%) indicates the extreme production volatility experienced during the eight quarter periods referred to in the table above;

 

    Recovered grade varied between a low of 3,38 g/t in Q4 2015 and a high of to 3,76 g/t in Q3 2014, as a result of the significant increase in the amount of development at the operations, as well as lower grade material delivered and recoveries achieved from the opencast operations commissioned in Q2 2013;

 

    PGM basket prices are derived from the relevant market supply and demand that exists at that particular point in time. For the eight quarter periods referred to in the table above, the PGM basket price varied from a high of US$1,153 in Q3 2014 to a low of US$719 for Q4 2015. This 37.6% variance indicates the volatility of the PGM basket price due to fluctuations in market demand and supply; and

 

    Due to the fact that the PGM basket price is quoted in US$, the revenue for each specific period is significantly dependent on the fluctuations of the ZAR against the US$. The ZAR’s strongest quarterly average position against the US$ was experienced during Q2 2014 at an exchange rate of ZAR10.25 = US$1 and the weakest during Q4 2015, which was ZAR14.2 = US$1. The 34.7% variance indicates the volatility of the ZAR against the US$.

The period to period variations in cost of sales are mainly as a result of:

 

    Varying labour costs due to changes in labour numbers, annual salary increases, overtime hours and bonus payments;

 

    Varying use of contractors depending on management’s production and development planning requirements;

 

    Fluctuations in stores costs based predominately on tonnes milled;

 

    Varying utility costs between winter and summer tariffs, as well as annual tariff increases;

 

    Depreciation charges based on the unit-of-production method moving in line with production as well as additional depreciation when capital work-in-progress is capitalized;

 

    Commodities such as fuel and steel are paid for in ZAR, but the price is determined in US$, such that the Company may be subject to a twofold negative impact in the event that the price of the commodity rises at the same time as a deterioration in the ZAR to US$ exchange rate; and

 

    Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the $ and the ZAR – although the functional currency of the South African subsidiaries is the ZAR, the presentation currency is the $, such that the cost of sales is impacted by the weakening of the ZAR.

5. A. 4. New standards and interpretations not yet adopted

A discussion of the Registrant’s changes in accounting policies can be found in Section 1.17 “Changes in Accounting Policies” in the MD&A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, which was furnished on EDGAR on Form 6-K on March 30, 2016 and is specifically incorporated by references herein in its entirety.

5. B. Liquidity and Capital Resources

See Section  1.11 “Liquidity” and 1.12 “Capital Resources” in the MD&A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, which was furnished on EDGAR on Form 6-K on March 30, 2016 and is specifically incorporated by references herein in its entirety.

5. B. 1. Financial Instruments

Interest rate hedging

The Company currently does not have any interest hedge in place.

5. B. 2. Material Commitments for Capital Expenditures

Capital commitments already contracted for by the Company amount to $5.8 million as at December 31, 2015 (compared to $6.1 million at December 31, 2014) and are comprised primarily of capital expenditure commitments for property, plant and equipment, and capital-work-in-progress relating to the Bokoni Mine.

 

85


Table of Contents

5.C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.

Atlatsa is a resource-expenditure based corporation and, accordingly, does not have a program of intellectual property development or research and development programs generally.

5. D. Trend Information

Fiscal 2015 was a challenging year for the South African PGM industry.

PGM prices remained under significant pressure throughout the year with concerns surrounding high PGM inventory levels, sluggish global economic growth and general negative sentiment towards commodities as an investment class continuing throughout the period. The situation was exacerbated by the Volkswagen Group (“VW”) “Dieselgate” scandal which resulted in negative sentiment towards diesel powered passenger vehicle purchases, particularly in the North American vehicle markets, with concerns surrounding a potential negative spill over into key European automotive markets.

Persistent low levels of productivity, increasing costs, declining production grades and decreasing revenues, coupled with community unrest, safety challenges and the after effects of a five month long labour strike in 2013 have placed significant pressure on South African primary PGM producers. This has resulted in the commencement of a restructuring trend within the South African PGM sector from 2014 onwards.

This trend has resulted in South African PGM majors undertaking various restructurings with Anglo Platinum having announced the placing of certain of its operations on care and maintenance, together with its intention to sell off its labour intensive operations, with a view to re-positioning its asset portfolio in South Africa to become 80% mechanized by 2020. Impala Platinum Holdings Limited (“Implats”) and Lonmin Plc (“Lonmin”) have also concluded their asset portfolio reviews, with Lonmin having announced certain shaft closures and production cut backs. In addition, a number of South African platinum producers have announced cut backs on intended capital expenditure associated with previously earmarked project expansions with an anticipated reduction in previously announced production volume targets going forward.

The continued pressure building within the South African PGM sector has begun to be evidenced by announcements surrounding merger and acquisition activity, together with significant balance sheet recapitalizations taking place. To that end; Anglo Platinum announced on September 9, 2015, a transaction for the sale of its Rustenburg operations to Sibanye Gold Limited (“Sibanye Gold”), while the board and shareholders of Aquarius Platinum Limited (“Aquarius”) have voted to support a takeover bid from Sibanye Gold, expected to be finalized in Q2, 2016. In addition, both Implats and Lonmin have undertaken significant balance sheet recapitalizations through Rights Issues in an effort to guard against what the Industry now accepts as an anticipated “lower for longer” price environment for PGM metal prices for the next few years.

Demand

Despite certain signs of economic recovery in European economies, platinum demand for autocatalytic converter usage in this key diesel engine dominated sector remains weak, when compared to peak demand levels in 2007. The subdued nature of European car sales during 2015 dims the outlook even further in the short term. The current economic turmoil in Europe is having a negative impact on the outlook for platinum prices. The introduction of Euro VI emission control standards in European economies is expected to increase the demand in this sector in the medium term.

There continues to be encouraging signs for improved palladium demand growth as manufacturing recoveries in the gasoline dominated United States and Chinese economies’ automobile sectors continue to show strong performance, with recent research estimates from IHS Automotive predicting an increase in global vehicle production from 85 million to 106 million units by 2021, with China accounting for 50% of such growth. Recent policy and legislative initiatives in China, aimed at improving air quality and the introduction of hydrogen fuel cell powered motor vehicles by major motor manufacturers, are anticipated to increase demand in the PGM sector in the medium term.

Investment demand for physical platinum and palladium through Exchange Traded Funds (“ETFs”) remains robust and has now established itself firmly as a meaningful contributing factor to demand for the white metals, with the two palladium backed ETFs by ABSA Bank and Standard Bank in South Africa demonstrating high levels of demand for physical metal exposure by institutional investors.

Supply

In addition to labour unrest, the South African PGM sector remains under pressure from rising costs, largely associated with imported inflation on key materials and power utility charges, which have increased by a compounded annual rate of 15% over the last 3 years.

 

86


Table of Contents

Given the continued pressure for PGMs; it has been widely anticipated that there should be a significant supply side response from South African PGM producers by either reducing or closing uneconomic production. The anticipated supply side response has not occurred in any meaningful manner, with most South African PGM producers announcing either a slow down or reduction in further project expansions, with moderate production growth expectations going forward. The situation in South Africa is further complicated politically by the risk of significant job losses as a result of mine closures in an economy which already grapples with a 25% unemployment rate.

Pricing

During Q2 2015, Platinum prices touched U.S. Dollar (“US$”) 1,060, a six-year low on June 22, 2015. This was the fourth consecutive quarter in the longest run of losses since March 1997. During Q3 2015 this downward trend continued with platinum prices nearing towards US$ 900 per oz by the quarter end. By year end the platinum price trended below US$ 900 per oz towards US$ 830 per oz. These US$ price decreases and consequent margin squeeze have been partly offset by a depreciation of the ZAR against the US$ which has a positive impact on the PGM revenue basket received by South African miners, as export metal is sold based on US$ pricing, whilst input costs are mostly based on the ZAR.

Notwithstanding the negative trend in the ZAR/US$ exchange rate, this currency depreciation has not done enough to offset a decrease in the Rand PGM basket price of metals which trended down by approximately 15% since the beginning of 2015. It has been estimated that at current Rand PGM spot prices approximately three quarters of the South African PGM industry is loss-making.

Despite the more positive outlook for PGMs in the medium term; there remains significant negative sentiment near term, evidenced by suppressed PGM prices with no clear short term catalyst for a rebound. This negative trend is being driven by various factors, such as a slowing Chinese growth outlook and anticipated U.S. interest rate increases during 2016, all culminating in negative investor sentiment towards the white metals, as evidenced by continued ETF outflows placing downward pressure on PGM spot metal pricing.

The future market direction and catalysts for PGMs will, to a large extent, be determined by a supply side response from major South African producers in 2016 and economic growth outlooks for key economies affecting PGM demand such as the United States, Europe, Japan and China.

5. E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on its financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

5. F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

See Section  1.12 “Capital Resources” in the MD&A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, which was furnished on EDGAR on Form 6-K on March 30, 2016 and is specifically incorporated by references herein in its entirety.

5. G. Safe Harbor

The safe harbor provided in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act applies to forward-looking information provided pursuant to ITEM  5.E and F above. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in the introduction to this Annual Report.

 

87


Table of Contents

 

ITEM 6 DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

6. A. Directors and Senior Management

Name and Occupation

The information as to the number of common shares beneficially owned, controlled or directed shown below is not within the knowledge of the management of the Company and has been furnished by the respective nominees as reported in their filings at http://www.sedi.ca.

The following table states the name, province or state, and country of residence of each of the directors and executive officers of the Company as at February 29, 2016, the positions and offices presently held by them and the period or periods of time during which each has served as a directors of the Company. Each director’s terms of office expires at the next annual general meeting of the shareholders of the Company.

 

Name, position with the Company and province or state and
country of residence

  

Date appointed (and resigned) as

a Director of the Company

  

Common Shares beneficially owned,
controlled or directed
(1) (2)

Andile MABIZELA (3)(4)(5)

Independent Non-Executive Director

Gauteng, South Africa

   May 6, 2014    Nil

Bava REDDY

Executive: Technical Services

Gauteng, South Africa

   October 2008    Nil

Boipelo LEKUBO

Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”)

Gauteng, South Africa

   September 1, 2014    Nil

Bongiwe NTULI (4)(5)(7)

Independent Non-Executive Director

Durban, South Africa

   May 6, 2014    Nil

Colin Wayne CLARKE (6)(7)(8)

Lead Independent Non-Executive Director

Gauteng, South Africa

  

May 6, 2014

Appointed Lead Independent Non-Executive Director December 30, 2014

   Nil

Fikile Tebogo DE BUCK (5)(9)(10)

Independent Non-Executive Director

Gauteng, South Africa

   September 2, 2008    Nil

Harold MOTAUNG

Director and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)

Gauteng, South Africa

  

Director since September 30, 2004

CEO since April 1, 2004

   24,086,686 (12)

Joel Martin KESLER

Director and Chief Commercial Officer (“CCO”)

Gauteng, South Africa

  

Director of the Company since June 27 2014.

Officer of the Company since March 1, 2010.

   959,361

Lerato MATLOSA

Corporate Secretary

Gauteng South Africa

   January 2013    Nil

Prudence LEBINA

Head Investor Relations and Corporate Finance

Gauteng, South Africa

   May 2014    133,333

Ralph HAVENSTEIN (11)

Independent non-executive director

Gauteng, South Africa

   June 27, 2014 to June 26, 2015    Nil

 

88


Table of Contents

Name, position with the Company and province or state and
country of residence

  

Date appointed (and resigned) as

a Director of the Company

  

Common Shares beneficially owned,
controlled or directed
(1) (2)

Tumelo MOTSISI

Director and Executive Chair

Gauteng, South Africa

   September 30, 2004    83,111,143 (13)

Notes:

 

(1) The information as to number of common shares beneficially owned controlled or directed is not known to the management of the Company and has been furnished by the respective nominees as reported in their filings at www.sedi.ca.
(2) Directors personally own or control a total of 142,496,467 common shares which represent approximately 25.7% of the current outstanding shares. The directors also hold 3,450,000 options.
(3) Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee.
(4) Member of the Compensation Committee.
(5) Member of the Sustainable Development Committee.
(6) Chair of the Compensation Committee.
(7) Member of the Audit and Risk Committee.
(8) Lead Independent Director.
(9) Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee.
(10) Member of Nominating and Governance Committee.
(11) Resigned on June 26, 2015.
(12) Indirect holdings being 44 of the 1,000 ordinary shares in the issued and outstanding share capital of Atlatsa Holdings, multiplied by the number of common shares of Atlatsa (342,896,438) held by Atlatsa Holdings in trust for the Pelawan Trust. Therefore, 23,956,618 of these shares are held as an indirect interest in the 342,896,438 share.
(13) Indirect holdings being 240 of the 1,000 ordinary shares in the issued and outstanding share capital of Atlatsa Holdings, multiplied by the number of common shares of Atlatsa (342,896,438) held by Atlatsa Holdings in trust for the Pelawan Trust. Therefore, 82,295,145 of these shares are held as an indirect interest in the 342,896,438 shares.

Additional details including the principal occupation for the past five years of the above directors are as follows:

ANDILE MABIZELA, LLB (Natal), BSc (Economics) Hons (Zimbabwe) - Independent Non-Executive Director

Andile Mabizela has worked in business development and executive management roles in the aviation, financial services and supply chain sectors. He has considerable board level experience. He was a Board member of SAA (SOC) Ltd between September 2012 November 2014, and he was the Chairman of SA Express (SOC) Ltd from October 2012 until his resignation in February 2014. He currently is serving his fourth year as Board Chairperson for the Johannesburg Property Company (MOE). Mr. Mabizela previously served on Stanlib Wealth Management subsidiary boards as well as country boards of Liberty Africa Asset Management, spanning Swaziland, Lesotho, Kenya and Botswana. From March 2009 to August 2010 Mr. Mabizela worked for STANLIB Wealth Management Limited as Head of the Institutional Multi Asset Business Unit (Pension Funds) and also served as Head of Asset Management for Liberty Africa. In the past 5 years, Mr. Mabizela has been an executive director of Afrilog South Africa (Proprietary) Limited (“Afrilog”). Afrilog is an international company with extensive experience in supply chain management, as well as providing project logistics and advisory services to mining companies on the African continent through its subsidiary Multilog (Pty) Ltd.

Mr. Mabizela is not, and was not within the past five years, an officer and/or director of any public company.

BAVA REDDY, BSc. (Hons), GDE, Pr. Sci. Nat. – Executive: Technical Services

Bava Reddy is a geologist by training with more than 20 years’ experience in the South African Minerals Industry. Mr Reddy held a number of positions in the Mineral Resources Management field at AngloGold and Harmony Gold Mining Limited. He was the General Manager at Harmony Gold’s Target Mine before joining Atlatsa Resources. He is responsible for all Technical and Mineral Resource Development aspects of Atlatsa’s Exploration and Mining Projects.

Mr. Reddy is not, and was not within the past five years, an officer and/or director of any public company.

BOIPELO P. LEKUBO - CA (SA), BCom (Hons) - CFO

Boipelo Lekubo is a chartered accountant (SA) by profession with extensive experience in group financial management and reporting within the mining industry. Boipelo holds a B.Com (Hons) degree from the University of Johannesburg (formerly Rand Afrikaans University) and qualified as a chartered accountant with KPMG. Her previous finance and accounting roles were at Total Coal South Africa (Proprietary) Limited and Northam Platinum Limited, respectively. She also has experience in project finance and corporate strategy. Ms Lekubo is a member of the South African Institute of Chartered Accountants.

 

89


Table of Contents

Ms. Lekubo is, or was within the past five years, an officer and/or director of the following public company:

 

Company

  

Positions Held

  

From

  

To

Trans Hex Group Limited    Independent Non-Executive Director    August 2013    Present

BONGIWE NTULI, Chartered Accountant CA (SA) – Independent Non-Executive Director

Ms. Ntuli is a Chartered Accountant (SA). She began her career working for Anglo American plc where she held various finance, treasury and risk management positions at its subsidiaries in South Africa, Canada and the United Kingdom. Ms. Ntuli joined Grindrod Freight Services on her return to South Africa in 2008 as its CFO. In 2012, Ms. Ntuli was appointed as a member of the Grindrod group executive committee as Executive: Corporate Services. In September 2014, Ms Ntuli was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Grindrod Ports, Terminals and Rail division and executive director of Grindrod limited. Ms. Ntuli also serves as a non-executive director of Adapt IT Holdings Limited, a JSE-listed entity, where she has been Chairman of the Audit Committee since 2008.

Ms. Ntuli is or was within the past five years, an officer and/or director of the following public company:

 

Company

  

Positions Held

  

From

  

To

Atlatsa Resources Corporation    Non-Executive Director    June 2014    Present
Adapt IT Holdings    Audit Committee Chairperson and Independent Non-Executive Director    May 2008    Present

COLIN WAYNE CLARKE, BA (Political Science), University of Texas at Austin; Juris Doctorate (JD), USA, The University of Denver School of Law, USA; Master of Business Administration (MBA), Said Business School, Oxford University, UK– Independent Non-Executive Director

Mr. Clarke is presently, Chairman of Sizwe Medical Fund’s Investment Committee, the Sizwe Medical Fund, is South Africa’s sixth (6th), largest medical aid fund, and also serves as Chairman of Benguela Global Fund Managers, as South African asset manager. Since 2012 Mr. Clarke has been the Chairman of ACPI Investment Managers South Africa (“ACPI”). ACPI is a London based asset management firm operating in the fixed income, equities, special situations and private equities space between 2011 and 2012. Mr. Clarke was the Chief Investment Officer of the Sishen Iron Ore’s Community Development Trust (the “Trust”). At the time of Mr. Clarke’s involvement, the Trust had a net asset value of ZAR8.1billion and dividend inflows of ZAR600m per annum. The Trust’s investment arm is SIOC-cdt Investment Holdings (RF) (Pty) Limited (“InvestCo”), and it is mandated to make all investments on behalf of the Trust and to ensure the long-term sustainability of Trust through its investing activities. During his time with the Trust, Mr. Clarke conceptualized, created, developed and executed the Trust’s investment policy and procedures (that invests in both listed and unlisted securities). During Mr. Clarke’s tenure InvestCo created more than ZAR976m worth of enterprise value for the Trust in the unlisted securities portfolio, while the listed portfolio is performing well above agreed benchmarks.

Mr. Clarke has also served as the Chief Operating Officer (‘COO”) of the National Empowerment Fund (“NEF”) in South Africa between 2009 and 2010, where he headed the group operations as well as Asset Management, Marketing and Communications and Strategy and Planning. Mr. Clarke has many years of international legal, private equity and corporate finance experience with multinational organizations such as BP Amoco, where he served as legal counsel in their acquisitions department. Mr. Clarke has also held the position of Deputy Director for Trade and Investment at the African America Institute and Programme Director for the Africa Regional Assistance Electoral Fund, which was, established to assist African countries’ transition to democracy, located in Washington DC.

Mr. Clarke gained extensive private equity experience in Africa having served as legal counsel and partner with two southern African focused private equity funds: (i) US$120 million Southern African Enterprise Development Fund (SAEDF); and (ii) Sloan Financial Groups US$100 million New Africa Advisors Fund between 1996 and 2000.

For the past five years to date, Mr Clarke has been a director of the following companies ACPI (SA) since 2012 to date, Sherbourne Capital, Director 2011- 1 January 2015, Audit Committee member and Chairman of Investment Committee of Sizwe Medical Fund - since June 2013 - to date, CFO of Sishen Iron Ore’s, Community Development Trust since 2011to 2012 and a director of SIOC-CDT Investment Holdings (RF) Pty Ltd and Continental Coal (Pty) Ltd. Mr Clarke was appointed Lead Independent Director of Atlatsa effective December 30, 2014.

 

90


Table of Contents

Mr Clarke is, or was within the past five years, an officer and/or director of the following public companies:

 

Company

  

Positions Held

  

From

  

To

Atlatsa Resources Corporation    Lead Independent Non-Executive Lead Director (as of December 30, 2014)    June 2014    Lead Independent Non-Executive Lead Director
Sherbourne Capital    Non-Executive Director    January 2011    1 January 2015

FIKILE TEBOGO DE BUCK, BA, FCCA – Independent Non-Executive Director

Fikile Tebogo De Buck is a Fellow of the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants FCCA (UK) and has extensive experience in business operations and financial affairs with companies in the mining sector. She holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics and Accounting from the University of Swaziland. Ms. De Buck is currently a non-executive director and the lead independent director of Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited. (“Harmony”) and is a member of various board committees of Harmony, including the Audit Committee. She has also served in various positions at the Council for Medical Schemes in South Africa and the Botswana Development Corporation based in Botswana.

Ms. De Buck is, or was within the past five years, an officer and/or director of the following public companies:

 

Company

  

Positions Held

  

From

  

To

Atlatsa Resources Corporation    Non-Executive Director    November 2008    Present
Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited    Non-Executive Director    April 2006    Present
Clientele Limited    Non-Executive Director    November 2012    November 2013
Clientele Life    Non-Executive Director    November 2012    November 2013

A. H. C. (HAROLD) MOTAUNG, BSc, MBA – CEO, President and Executive Director

Harold Motaung was previously employed at the Free State and Vaal River operations of Anglo American Corporation of South Africa Limited for six years as a mining engineer and as a production supervisor. Mr. Motaung then moved to the DME as a director within the Mine Inspectorate. As a Deputy Chief Inspector, he was responsible for implementing the Mine, Health and Safety Act. Subsequently he was appointed Chief Director within the Mine Inspectorate. His portfolio included the gold, platinum and coal regions of South Africa.

In Mr. Motaung’s capacity as a Chief Director of the Mine Inspectorate, he was appointed on numerous boards of government–associated institutions including the National Nuclear Regulator, the Deep Mining Board and the Mining Qualifications Authority. Mr. Motaung also chaired the Mines Research Board, which administered a mining safety fund and he was chaired the MINTEK Board. Mr. Motaung also represented the South African government in a number of international and bi-national engagements with foreign countries, and was a member of the DME executive team responsible for the briefs and presentations at the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on the status of minerals and energy within the country, which culminated in the enactment of the Minerals & Petroleum Development Act.

Mr. Motaung left the DME to establish a mining and geological consultancy, African Minerals Professionals (Pty) Limited. Mr. Motaung has been a director of Atlatsa since September 2004 and is not a director of any other public companies. He is a founding member of Atlatsa Holdings, the controlling shareholder of Atlatsa.

Mr. Motaung is, or was within the past five years, an officer and/or director of the following public company:

 

Company

  

Positions Held

  

From

  

To

Atlatsa Resources Corporation    CEO, President and Executive Director    September 2004, appointed CEO and President on April 1, 2011    Present

 

91


Table of Contents

JOEL KESLER, B.COM, LLB (CUM LAUDE) UCT – Executive: CCO

Joel Kesler is a South African qualified lawyer with 18 years of international experience in mining finance, mergers and acquisitions, business and corporate development. He was a founding member of Atlatsa Holdings in 2002 and was a key person in effecting the Reverse Takeover of Atlatsa Resources (formerly Anooraq Resources) in 2004. From 2005 to 2014 Mr. Kesler has been serving on the Atlatsa Resources Executive as its CCO, primarily responsible for the Company’s corporate and business strategy, corporate finance and corporate communications.

Mr. Kesler is, or was within the past five years, an officer and/or director of the following public company.

 

Company

  

Positions Held

  

From

  

To

Atlatsa Resources Corporation    Executive Director    June 27, 2014    Present

LERATO D. MATLOSA - LLB, LLM (Corporate law), ACIS and Certificate in Mining and Prospecting Law

Lerato Matlosa holds an LLB degree and Masters in Corporate Law. She is a qualified Chartered Secretary with the South African Institute of Corporate Secretaries; she also completed a certificate in Prospecting and Mining Law with the University of Witwatersrand Mandela Institute. Prior to joining Atlatsa Lerato was a director of Director Focus Corporate Services, a corporate governance and compliance specialist company. Lerato is a member of the Canadian Society of Corporate Secretaries and a member of Chartered Secretaries of South Africa. She is a Trustee of the Anooraq Community Participation Trust. The Community Trust objectives are to promote social and economic development in affected communities.

Ms Matlosa is not, and was not within the past five years, an officer and/or director of any public company.

PRUDENCE LEBINA - Head Investor Relations and Corporate Finance- CA (SA)

Prudence Lebina is a chartered accountant by profession and has extensive experience in corporate finance, mergers and acquisitions and sponsor services work. She spent five years in investment banking at Deutsche Bank SA. Prior to joining Atlatsa, she was Investor Relations Manager and part of the corporate finance team at Exxaro Resources Limited.

Prudence holds a B.Com degree and a higher diploma in Accountancy from the University of Witwatersrand as well as a certificate in Business Leadership from Columbia Business School. She qualified as a chartered accountant with PwC.

Ms Lebina is and was within the past five years, an officer and/or director of the following public company:

 

Company

  

Positions Held

  

From

  

To

Gaia Infrastructure Capital Limited   

Independent Non-Executive Director

Lead Independent Director

   October 1, 2015    Present

TUMELO M. MOTSISI, BA, LLM, MBA – Executive Chair and Director

Tumelo Motsisi is a prominent South African businessperson with experience in the South African financial services, mining and energy sectors. Between 1994 and 1998 he was employed first as a senior manager and then as a director within the Negotiated Benefits Consultants division of Alexander Forbes, a South African financial services company.

In 1998 he established Kopano Ke Matla Investment Company (“KKM”), the investment arm of South Africa’s largest trade union federation, the Congress of South African Trade Unions. He was subsequently appointed as the CEO of KKM. Mr. Motsisi also served as Executive Chair of Prosperity Holdings (Proprietary) Limited, a financial services company established between KKM, NBC Financial Services (Proprietary) Limited and Peregrine (Proprietary) Limited. Mr. Motsisi is a founding member of Atlatsa Holdings, the controlling shareholder of Atlatsa.

Mr. Motsisi is, or was within the past five years, an officer and/or director of the following public company.

 

Company

  

Positions Held

  

From

  

To

Atlatsa Resources Corporation    Executive Chairman    September 2004    Present

 

92


Table of Contents

6. B. Compensation

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Compensation Committee

The Company has a Compensation Committee to assist the Board of Directors in carrying out its responsibilities relating to executive and director compensation. The Compensation Committee has the following duties, responsibilities and authority:

 

(a)   To recommend to the Board of Directors the form and amount of compensation to be paid by the Company to the Directors, including compensation to be paid in consideration of a director acting on a committee of the Board of Directors.
(b)   To review and approve corporate goals and objectives relating to the compensation of the Company’s executive officers, including the Chairman, CEO, CFO and other senior officers (collectively, the “Officers”) if applicable. The Compensation Committee evaluates the performance of the Officers in light of those goals and reviews and recommend to the Board the Officers’ annual compensation and incentive or equity plan participation levels and bases of participation. Recommendations of compensation include salary, bonus, and other incentive compensation.
(c)   To review and recommend to the Board on an annual basis the evaluation process and compensation structure for the Company’s other employees.
(d)   Based upon input and recommendations from the Officers, to review the Company’s incentive compensation plans and recommend changes in such plans to the Board of Directors as needed and to review and submit to the Board of Directors recommendations concerning new incentive compensation plans.
(e)   To administer the Company’s stock option and other equity based compensation plans and determine the grants of stock options and other equity based compensation.
(f)   To prepare and publish any annual executive compensation report in the Company’s annual information form or proxy statement.

The Compensation Committee is composed of Colin Clarke (the Lead Independent Director appointed to the Committee on 30 December 2014) Anu Dhir (resigned on 30 December 2014), Andile Mabizela (6 May 2014) and Bongiwe Ntuli (appointed to the Committee on 30 December 2014), all of whom are independent directors. During the 2015 financial year, the committee met five times and the proceedings at such meetings were documented in the form of meeting minutes.

In this section “Named Executive Officer” (or “NEO”) means each of the following individuals:

 

(a)   the Chairman;
(b)   the CEO;
(c)   the CFO;
(d)   each of the three most highly compensated executive officers, or the three most highly compensated individuals acting in a similar capacity, other than the Chairman, CEO and CFO, at the end of the most recently completed financial year whose total compensation was, individually, more than $150,000 for that financial year; and
(e)   each individual who would be a NEO under paragraph (d) but for the fact that the individual was neither an executive officer of the Company, nor acting in a similar capacity, at December 31, 2015.

Report on Executive Compensation

The Board assumes responsibility for reviewing and monitoring the long-range compensation strategy for the senior management of the Company under the guidance of the Compensation Committee. As part of its mandate, the Board determines the type and amount of compensation for the Company’s executive officers. In addition, the Board reviews the methodology utilized by the Company for approving the remuneration strategy of all employees throughout the organization.

 

93


Table of Contents

The Company’s Compensation Committee receives competitive market information on compensation levels for executives. The Company’s compensation policies and programs are designed to be competitive with similar mining companies and to recognize and reward executive performance consistent with the success of the Company’s business.

Philosophy and Objectives

The compensation program for the senior management of the Company is designed to ensure that the level and form of compensation achieves certain objectives, including:

 

(a)   attracting and retaining talented, qualified and effective executives;
(b)   motivating the short and long-term performance of these executives; and
(c)   better aligning their interests with those of the Company’s Shareholders.

In compensating its senior management, the Company has employed a combination of base salary, benefits, bonus compensation and equity participation through its stock option plan.

6. B. 1. General

Given the evolving nature of the Company’s business, the Board continues to review and redesign the overall compensation plan for NEOs so as to continue to address the objectives identified herein. The Board has not considered the implications of the risks associated with the Company’s current compensation program; however, the Company will review and consider the implications of any risks associated with the Company’s compensation program and design such compensation policies and practices in order to mitigate such risks.

There is no restriction on NEOs or directors regarding the purchase of financial instruments including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, or units of exchange funds that are designed to hedge or offset a decrease in market value of equity securities granted as compensation or held, directly or indirectly, by an NEO or a director. For the year ended December 31, 2015, no NEO or director, directly or indirectly, employed a strategy to hedge or offset a decrease in market value of equity securities granted as compensation or held.

6. B. 2. Base Salary

In the Board’s view, paying base salaries that are competitive in the markets in which the Company operates is a first step to attracting and retaining talented, qualified and effective executives. The NEOs are paid a salary in order to ensure that the compensation package offered by the Company is in line with that offered by other companies in our industry, and as an immediate means of rewarding the NEO for efforts expended on behalf of the Company.

The salary to be paid to a particular NEO is determined by gathering competitive salary information on comparable companies within the industry from a variety of sources, including surveys conducted by independent consultants and national and international sources of such listed information. The Company utilized the services of PE Corporate Services (Pty) Ltd to assess this information for the 2015 fiscal year. Payment of a cash salary fits within the objective of the compensation program since it rewards the NEO for performance of his or her duties and responsibilities. Salaries of executive officers are reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee for recommendation to the Board of Directors.

 

94


Table of Contents

6. B. 3. SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The compensation provided to NEOs of the Company during the financial year ended December 31, 2015, for each of the Company’s three most recently completed financial years, is as follows:

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE OF NEO’S at DECEMBER 31, 2015

 

                          Non-equity incentive plan
compensation
                     
     Year      Salary      Option based
awards
     Annual
incentive
plans
     Long-term
incentive
Plans
     Pension,
provident and
medical
     All other
compensation
    Total
compensation
 
            $      $      $      $      $      $     $  

Name

  

 

    

 

     (2)     

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

   

 

 

Tumelo Motsisi (1) (4)

     2015         500,439         Nil         Nil         Nil         125,467         17,487        643,393   

Director

     2014         501,217         Nil         Nil         Nil         110,917         55,109        667,243   

Executive Chairman

     2013         492,788         Nil         Nil         Nil         98,614         18,618        610,019   

Harold Motaung (1) (3) (4)

     2015         502,837         Nil         Nil         Nil         122,894         17,487        643,217   

Director

     2014         498,948         Nil         Nil         Nil         115,431         54,965        669,344   

CEO

     2013         490,823         Nil         Nil         Nil         102,367         18,618        611,809   

Joel Kesler (1)

     2015         420,574         Nil         Nil         Nil         98,372         17,487        536,433   

Director

     2014         415,092         Nil         Nil         Nil         92,415         48,675        556,181   

Executive: CCO

     2013         407,862         Nil         Nil         Nil         82,198         18,618        508,678   

Bava Reddy

     2015         222,287         Nil         Nil         Nil         59,540         20,502        302,329   

Executive: Mineral

     2014         224,378         Nil         Nil         Nil         56,522         37,759        318,660   

Strategy

     2013         231,674         Nil         Nil         Nil         53,088         21,828        306,590   

De Wet Schutte

     2013         219,117         Nil         Nil         Nil         46,015         1,498        266,630   

CFO (1) (5)

     2012         362,914         Nil         Nil         Nil         81,527         3,587        448,028   

Kogi Naicker

     2014         81,692         Nil         Nil         Nil         18,643         116,332 (7)       216,667   

Interim CFO (6)

     2013         59,481         Nil         Nil         Nil         10,840         76,347 (6)       146,667   

Boipelo Lekubo

     2015         161,485         Nil         Nil         Nil         36,464         16,399        214,348   

CFO (8)

     2014         52,142         Nil         Nil         Nil         10,950         245        63,336   

Prudence Lebina

     2015         154,627         Nil         Nil         Nil         35,194         15,552        205,373   

Head Investor Relations and Corporate Finance (9)

     2014         94,414         Nil         Nil         Nil         19,827         650        114,891   

Notes:

 

(1) Compensation of certain of the Company’s South African executives is contracted in Canadian dollars but is paid to each executive in ZAR at a month end exchange rate at the time. For the purpose of the annual amount the ZAR value for the year has been converted at 1 CAD = ZAR9.95, being the average 2015 rate. The preceding years are converted at the respective annual average exchange rate.
(2) Options granted are in terms of the Stock Option Plan. (See “Stock Option Plan”). For compensation purposes, the Black-Scholes option valuation model has been used to determine the fair value on the date of grant. The Black-Scholes option valuation is determined using the expected life of the stock option, expected volatility of the Company’s common share price, expected dividend yield, and risk-free interest rate.
(3) Mr. Motaung was appointed as CEO in April 2011.
(4) The NEOs who are also directors do not receive any compensation in their capacity as directors of the Company.
(5) Mr. Schutte resigned on August 1, 2013.
(6) Ms. Naicker was appointed Interim CFO on August 1, 2013 and is only included in the above table from that date. Included in “All other compensation” is an acting allowance of $75,972.
(7) Ms. Naicker was Interim CFO until September 1, 2014 and is only included in the above table from January 1, 2014 until said date. Included in “All other compensation” is an acting allowance of $115,762.
(8) Ms. Lekubo was appointed CFO on September 1, 2014 and is only included in the above table from that date.
(9) Ms. Lebina was appointed Head Investor Relations and Corporate Finance on May 12, 2014 and is only included in the above table from that date.

6. B. 4. Bonus Compensation

The Board considers performance, shareholder benefits, competitive factors and other matters in awarding bonuses. No other bonus arrangements have been agreed although certain NEOs may be awarded bonus compensation in 2015 based on objectives agreed to by the Board. Bonuses equivalent to a monthly base salary was paid to the CFO and Head Investor Relations and Corporate Finance in December 2015.

 

95


Table of Contents

6. B. 5. Equity Participation

The purpose of the equity incentive plans of the Corporation is to encourage equity participation by the Company’s key directors, officers, employees and consultants in order to align the interests of such persons with those of Shareholders and to assist the Company in attracting and retaining qualified directors, officers, employees and consultants.

On May 6, 2014, the Board approved the adoption, subject to Shareholder and TSX approval, of the Equity Incentive Plans. The Board has delegated to the Compensation Committee the right to administer the Equity Incentive Plans and to grant New Options, Share Appreciation Rights (“SARs”), Restricted Share Units (“RSUs”) and Conditional Share Units (“CSUs”); collectively the “New Equity Incentive Plans”. Under the Equity Incentive Plans previous grants of Options will be taken into account when considering new grants.

At the Company’s Annual General Meeting on June 27, 2014, shareholders approved the New Equity Incentive Plans and authorized issuances thereunder to entitle the applicable holders thereof to such number of Common Shares not more than 10% of the Company’s outstanding Common Shares from time to time. Upon the adoption of New Equity Incentive Plans (linked to the share price on the JSE), the prior Share Option Plan’s rules were terminated, but the Stock Options (linked to the share price on the TSX) still remain until they expire. The old Stock Options are now administered under the new rules.

During Fiscal 2015, the Company provided equity incentive compensation only through its SARS, CSUs and RSUs. The Equity Incentive Plan was designed to foster and promote the long term financial success of the Company by strengthening the ability of the Company to attract and retain highly competent non-executive directors (“NEDs”) (via Share Options), officers, employees and consultants (via the SARs, CSUs and RSUs) and to motivate the performance of such persons through the grant of equity compensation which promotes alignment between the interests of such persons and the interests of Shareholders in creating long term Shareholder value. The Equity Incentive Plan will enable employees to participate in the long term growth and financial success of the Company. Units granted pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plan were granted taking into account a number of factors, including the amount and term of Options previously granted, base salary, bonuses and competitive factors.

6. B. 5.1. Stock options

The Company has a share option plan approved by the shareholders that allows it to grant options, subject to regulatory terms and approval, to acquire up to 55,442,181 (2014: 55,428,847) common shares. As at December 31, 2015, 8,962,047 options were outstanding and 8,579,030 options remained available to be granted. (See ITEM 6. B. 5.1.1 Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans below.) The exercise price of each option is set by the Board of Directors at the time of grant but cannot be less than the market price (less permissible discounts) on the TSX. Options have a term of up to a maximum of ten years (however, the Company has historically granted options for up to a term of five years), and terminate 30 to 90 days following the termination of the optionee’s employment or term of engagement, except in the case of retirement or death or unless the Board determine otherwise.

6. B. 5.1.1 Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

 

Plan Category

  Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)
    Weighted-average exercise
price of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)
    Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance
under equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(c)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by securityholders

    8,962,047 (1)       0.66        0   

Equity compensation plans not approved by securityholders

    0        —          8,579,030 (2)  

Total

    8,962,047        0.66        8,579,030   

Notes:

 

(1) This represents the number options outstanding under the Equity Incentive Plans.
(2) This represents the number options remaining available to be granted under the Equity Incentive Plans.

The New Share Option Plan replaces and supersedes the Stock Option Plan. All Options granted under the Stock Option Plan will remain outstanding and will be governed by the terms and conditions of the New Share Option Plan as if they were granted thereunder.

 

96


Table of Contents

6. B. 5.1.2 Material Terms of the Stock Option Plan

The following is a summary of the material terms of the Stock Option Plan:

 

    all Options granted under the Stock Option Plan are non-assignable and non-transferable;

 

    for Options granted to employees or service providers (inclusive of management company employees), the Company is required to represent that the proposed Optionee is a bona fide employee or service provider (inclusive of a management company employee), as the case may be, of the Company or of any of its subsidiaries;

 

    options have a maximum term of ten years; although to date Options have generally expired five years after the date of grant. Options terminate 30 days following the termination of the Optionee’s employment or other relationship with the Company, except in the case of retirement or death. In the case of retirement, Options terminate 30 to 90 days, at management’s discretion, following retirement. In the case of death, Options terminate at the earlier of one year after the event or the expiry of the Option. Vesting of Options is at the discretion of the Compensation Committee at the time the Options are granted;

 

    point 3.2.a of the rules allow the Board to change the terms; this allowed the board to allow the resigned NED to keep their options after resignation; and

 

    the exercise price of an Option granted under the Stock Option Plan must not be less than the closing price for Common Shares of the Company as traded on the JSE on the last trading day before the date that the Option is granted less allowable discounts as permitted by JSE (depending on the price at the time of grant).

6. B. 5.1.3 Issue of options

On August 20, 2014, the Company issued 5,142,882 share options to its NEDs in terms of its approved share option plan at a strike price of ZAR3.813 ($0.39). Subsequently; 690,835 options that were originally awarded were cancelled.

For NEDs employed for more than six months as at the grant date of the options, one third of the share options will vest six months after the grant date, the second third of the share options will vest one year after the grant date and the last third will vest eighteen months after the grant date. For NEDs employed for less than six months as at the grant date of the options, one third of the share options will vest one year after the grant date, the second third of the share options will vest eighteen months after the grant date and the last third will vest two years after the grant date.

The share-based payment recognized during Fiscal 2015 was $319,490 (2014:370,891).

As at December 31, 2015 8,962,047 options were outstanding with the following terms:

 

Expiry date

   Option price      Number of options
outstanding
    Number of options
vested
     Weighted average
life (years)
 

November 30, 2016

   $ 0.84         4,010,000 (1)       4,010,000         0.92   

May 1, 2017

   $ 1.61         500,000 (1)       500,000         1.33   

August 19, 2024

   $ 0.39         4,452,047 (2)       2,274,919         8.64   
     

 

 

   

 

 

    

Total

        8,962,047        6,784,919      
     

 

 

   

 

 

    

Weighted average exercise price

      $ 0.66      $ 0.66      

 

(1) Option-based Awards (prior plan) – both NEDs and NEOs – see ITEMS 6. B. 5.1.3.1 and 6. B. 5.1.3.2 , which would indicate the different awards.
(2) Share options issued only to NEDs – see ITEM 6. B. 5. 3.1.

To be eligible for the issuance of stock option under the Equity Incentive Plan, an Optionee must be a NED.

 

97


Table of Contents

6. B. 5.1.3.1 Share options issued to the NEDs

The following table sets out all option-based awards outstanding as at December 31, 2015, for each director, excluding a director who is already set out in disclosure for a NEO for the Company:

 

     Option-based Awards  

NAME

   Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options (#)
    Option
exercise
price ($)
     Option expiration date    Value of
unexercised
in-the-money
options
($)
 

Fikile De Buck

    

 

100,000

690 835

  

  

   

 

0.84

0.39

  

  

   November 30, 2016

August 19, 2024

    

 

Nil

Nil

(1)  

 (2)  

Anu Dhir (4)

    

 

150,000

997,872

  

  

   

 

0.84

0.39

  

  

   November 30, 2016

August 19, 2024

    

 

Nil

Nil

(1)  

 (2)  

Rizelle Sampson (4)

    

 

150,000

690 835

  

  

   

 

0.84

0.39

  

  

   November 30, 2016

August 19, 2024

    

 

Nil

Nil

(1)  

 (2)  

Andile Mabizela

     690 835        0.39       August 19, 2024      Nil  (2)  

Bongiwe Ntuli

     690 835        0.39       August 19, 2024      Nil  (2)  

Colin Clarke

     690 835        0.39       August 19, 2024      Nil  (2)  

Ralph Havenstein

     Nil  (3)       Nil       Nil      Nil   

 

(1) The value at December 31, 2015 is calculated by determining the difference between the closing price of the Company’s common shares on December 31, 2015 ($0.03) underlying the option on the TSX the exercise price of the options. These were issued as option-based Awards (prior plan).
(2) The value at December 31, 2015 is calculated by determining the difference between the closing price of the Company’s common shares on December 31, 2015 ($0.03) underlying the option on the JSE the exercise price of the options. These were issued on August 20, 2014.
(3) Subsequently cancelled due to resignation.
(4) The Board of Directors approved the retention of options after resignation.

6. B. 5.1.3.2 Share options issued to the NEOs

The Stock Option Plan was previously approved by Shareholders on May 21, 2004, as amended June 17, 2005 and again on June 15, 2009. Amendments to the Stock Option Plan were approved by Atlatsa shareholders at the annual and extraordinary general meeting of the Company held on June 15, 2009.

At the annual and extraordinary general meeting of the shareholders of the Company held on June 15, 2009; all the share options issued was approved for repricing to $1.29. The following table sets out all option-based awards outstanding as at December 31, 2015 for each NEO:

 

98


Table of Contents

NAME

   Option-based Awards      Share-based Awards  
   Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options
(#)
     Option
exercise
price
($)
     Option
expiration date
   Value of
unexercised
in-the-
money
options (1)
($)
     Number of
Shares or
units of shares
that have not
vested
(#)
     Market or
payout value
of share-
based awards
that have not
vested
($)
     Market or
payout value
of vested
share-based
awards not
paid out or
distributed
($)
 

Tumelo Motsisi

     800,000         0.84       November 30,
2016
     Nil         Nil         Nil         Nil   

Harold Motaung

     510,000         0.84       November 30,
2016
     Nil         Nil         Nil         Nil   

De Wet Schutte

     500,000         1.61       May 1, 2017      Nil         Nil         Nil         Nil   

Joel Kesler

     570,000         0.84       November 30,
2016
     Nil         Nil         Nil         Nil   

Bava Reddy

     570,000         0.84       November 30,
2016
     Nil         Nil         Nil         Nil   

The value at December 31, 2015 is calculated by determining the difference between the closing price of the Company’s Common Shares on the TSX, at December 31, 2015 ($0.03) underlying the option on the TSX and the exercise price of the options.

6. B. 5.2. CSUs

On May 28, 2015, the Company awarded 26,420,300 CSUs to certain eligible employees of Plateau entitling the applicable employee to one common share of the Company on the vesting date. These CSUs will vest on March 31, 2018 after the Company’s Average Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) for the 2015, 2016 and 2017 years are assessed when compared to five specified peer comparator companies. Subsequently; 226,400 units that were originally awarded were cancelled.

On August 20, 2014, the Company awarded 9,004,500 CSUs to certain eligible employees of Plateau entitling the applicable employee to one common share of the Company on the vesting date. These CSUs will vest on March 31, 2017 after the Company’s TSR for the 2014, 2015 and 2016 years are assessed when compared to five specified peer comparator companies. Subsequently; 132,000 units that were originally awarded were cancelled. The CSUs will vest based on the following ranking in relation to the TSR:

 

Ranking of Atlatsa to peer comparator companies

   % of shares to vest  

First

     100   

Second

     90   

Third

     60   

Fourth

     40   

Fifth or below

     0   

 

99


Table of Contents

The following table sets out all the CSUs during the year ended December 31, 2015, for each NEO:

 

NAME

   YEAR   
Option based
awards - Value
vested during
the year (1)
     Share-based awards – Value
vested during the year
($)
     Equity
incentive plan
compensation – value earned
during year
 

Tumelo Motsisi

   2014      Nil         Nil         2,845,500   (1)  
   2015      Nil         Nil         7,886,600   (4)  

Harold Motaung

   2014      Nil         Nil         2,844,800   (1)  
   2015      Nil         Nil         7,884,500   (4)  

Joel Kesler

   2014      Nil         Nil         1,524,000   (1)  
   2015      Nil         Nil         4,223,900   (4)  

Bava Reddy

   2014      Nil         Nil         665,100   (1)  
   2015      Nil         Nil         2,372,500   (4)  

Kogi Naicker

   2014      Nil         Nil         Nil   (3)  
   2015      Nil         Nil         Nil   (3)  

Boipelo Lekubo

   2014      Nil         Nil         408,000   (2)  
   2015      Nil         Nil         1,604,100   (4)  

Prudence Lebina

   2014      Nil         Nil         384,600   (1)  
   2015      Nil         Nil         1,513,300   (4)  

Notes:

 

(1) These units represent the number of CSUs issued on August 20, 2014.
(2) These units represent the number of CSUs issued when the CFO joined the Company (September 1, 2014.)
(3) Subsequently cancelled due to resignation.
(4) These units represent the number of CSUs issued on May 28, 2015.

The share-based payment expense recognized during the period was $1,600,016 (2014: $nil).

6. B. 5.3. SARS

On May 28, 2015, the Company awarded 2,887,070 SARS to certain eligible employees of Plateau entitling the applicable employee to one common share of the Company on the vesting date. The Participant’s SARS granted shall vest on or after the date upon which the five day volume weighted share price as at the vesting date of December 31, 2017 shall have increased from the grant date to the vesting date by a percentage that exceeds the movement in the consumer price index over the same period.

The following table sets out the SARS (earned) during the year ended December 31, 2015, for each NEO:

 





NAME

  
Option based
awards - Value
vested during
the year (1)
     Share-based awards – Value vested
during the year
($)
     Equity
incentive plan
compensation – value earned
during year
 

Tumelo Motsisi

     Nil         Nil         1,774,478   

Harold Motaung

     Nil         Nil         Nil   

Joel Kesler

     Nil         Nil         Nil   

Bava Reddy

     Nil         Nil         177,939   

Boipelo Lekubo

     Nil         Nil         481,229   

Prudence Lebina

     Nil         Nil         113,497   

The share-based payment recognized during the period was $49,789.96.

 

100


Table of Contents

6. B. 5.4. RSUs

On November 6, 2014, the Company awarded 133,333 RSUs to eligible employees of Plateau entitling the applicable employee to one common share of the Company on the vesting date. These RSUs vested on May 31, 2015.

The total expense recognized was $31,856 (2014: $9,358) and 133,333 shares were issued.

6. B. 6. PENSION AND PROVIDENT PLAN BENEFITS

The full time employees of the Company at the corporate offices belong to the Alexander Forbes Retirement Fund (Provident and Pension schemes). The Company contributes 14% of the basic salaries of the employees on a monthly basis to the fund and the employees contribute 7% of their basic salaries on a monthly basis to the fund.

The employees of the Bokoni Mine belong to the following funds depending on their position:

 

    The Company contributes 14% of the basic salaries of certain employees to the Anglo American Platinum Group Provident Fund.

 

    The Company contributes 14% of their basic salaries of certain employees to the Anglo American Platinum Mines Retirement Fund.

Membership of these retirement funds is compulsory in all cases.

 

Provident Fund

                           

Name

   Accumulated value at
January 1, 2015
     Total growth
earned/interest earned
(employer contribution)
     Net Employer
Contributions
     Accumulated value at
December 31, 2015
 
     ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)  

Tumelo Motsisi

     420 673         55 595         49 527         525 796   

Harold Motaung

     387 522         37 995         66 972         492 489   

Joel Kesler

     324 800         31 842         56 045         412 686   

Bava Reddy

     216 085         20 958         31 344         268 388   

Boipelo Lekubo (1)

     4 729         1 219         20 688         26 636   

Prudence Lebina (2)

     9 922         1 662         19 812         31 395   

 

Pension Fund

                           

Name

   Accumulated value at
January 1, 2015
     Total growth
earned/interest earned
(employer contribution)
     Net Employer
Contributions
     Accumulated value at
December 31, 2015
 
     ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)  

Tumelo Motsisi

     245 213         22 024         46 371         313 608   

Harold Motaung

     225 983         22 061         38 860         286 904   

Joel Kesler

     189 034         18 454         32 521         240 008   

Bava Reddy

     125 872         12 166         18 191         156 229   

Boipelo Lekubo (1)

     2 758         682         12 008         15 447   

Prudence Lebina (2)

     5 776         940         11 500         18 216   

Notes:

 

(1) Ms. Lekubo was appointed CFO on September 1, 2014 and is only included in the above table from that date.
(2) Ms. Lebina was appointed Head of Investor Relations on May 12, 2014 and are only included in the above table from that date.

6. B. 7. EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS, TERMINATION AND CHANGE IN CONTROL BENEFITS

Written contracts are in place between the Company and all NEOs. It is not expected that there will be any written contracts between the Company and any independent non-executive directors which are appointed to the Board.

There are no compensatory plans or arrangements with the NEOs that entitle a NEO to receive more than $100,000 from the Company as a result of the resignation or any other termination of employment of the NEOs’ employment, a change in control of the Company or its subsidiaries or a change of the NEOs’ responsibilities following a change in control.

Written employment contracts between the Company and the Company’s NEOs provide for compensation payable under certain circumstances following termination or a change in control, inclusive of the following:

 

    a 30 day notice period applies except for the Executive Chairman, the CEO and the CCO, which is 6 months;

 

    payment of annual holiday leave;

 

    in terms of the stock option plan, all vested stock options held by the employee may be exercised within 90 days of termination.

 

101


Table of Contents

6. B. 8. INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Each director of the Company, who is not an executive officer, but an independent director, namely, Fikile De Buck, , Andile Mabizela, Bongiwe Ntuli, Colin Clarke and Ralph Havenstein were entitled to the following fees: an annual director’s fee of $45,000, plus an additional fee of $15,000 for the Audit and Risk Committee Chairperson and $11,000 for other Committee Chairpersons.

The Lead Director was entitled to an annual fee of $20,000; members attending the Audit and Risk and Compensation Committees were entitled an annual amount of $8,000 and members attending other committees are entitled to $7,000 per annum. For special committee attendance, members were entitled to $ $500.00 per meeting attended. Executive officers do not receive additional compensation for serving as directors.

The compensation provided to the directors, excluding a director who is included in disclosure for an NEO for the Company’s most recently completed financial year of December 31, 2015 is:

 

Name of Director (2)

   Fees earned
($) (1)
     Option-
based
awards
($)
     Bonus
Shares
     Non-equity
incentive
plan
compensation
     Total
($)
 

Fikile De Buck

     74,999.92         Nil         Nil         Nil         74,999.92   

Andile Mabizela

     71,999.80         Nil         Nil         Nil         71,999.80   

Bongiwe Ntuli

     68,499.80         Nil         Nil         Nil         68,499.80   

Colin Clarke

     84,999.76         Nil         Nil         Nil         84,999.76   

Ralph Havenstein (3)

     36,497.92         Nil         Nil         Nil         36,497.92   

Notes:

 

(1) Includes all fees awarded, earned, paid or payable in cash for services as a director, including annual retainer fees, committee, chair and special meeting fees.
(2) Directors who are also NEO’s and receive compensation for services as directors are included in the NEO summary compensation table.
(3) Resigned on June 26, 2015.

The following table sets out all incentive plans (value vested or earned) during the year ended December 31, 2015, for each director, excluding a director who is already set out in disclosure for a NEO for the Company:

 

NAME

   Option based
awards - Value
vested during the
year (1)
     Non-equity based
incentive
compensation –
Value earned
during year
 

Fikile De Buck

     Nil         Nil   

Andile Mabizela

     Nil         Nil   

Bongiwe Ntuli

     Nil         Nil   

Colin Clarke

     Nil         Nil   

Ralph Havenstein

     Nil         Nil   

Note:

 

(1) These amounts represent the aggregate dollar value that would have been realized if the options under the option-based award had been exercised on the vesting date. The value of each amount has been determined by taking the difference between the market price of the option at date of exercise and the exercise or base price of the option under the option-based award on the vest date.

6. C. Board Practices

ITEM  6.A. above sets out each directors’ and officers’ date of expiration of their current term of office, as applicable, and the period during which such person has served in that office

6. C. 1. Board of Directors

There is no written contract between the Company and Fikile De Buck. All other NEDs who were appointed to the Board in 2014 have written contracts with no term limits. In compliance with the TSX rules, directors are confirmed by the annual

 

102


Table of Contents

general meeting and appointed for a period of approximately one year until the next annual general meeting, unless they are not standing for reappointment or are not recommended for appointment.

Directors are considered to be independent if they have no direct or indirect material relationship with the Company. A “material relationship” is a relationship which could, in the view of the Company’s Board of Directors, be reasonably expected to interfere with the exercise of a director’s independent judgment. Examples of such material relationships include employment relationships, officer positions, and recent employment by the auditors and like matters. The majority of the directors are independent directors. The Company’s Corporate Governance Policies and Procedures Manual, which governs the conduct of the Board of Directors, are available on the Company’s website at http://www.atlatsaresources.co.za . Information contained on or accessible through the Company’s website is not a part of this Annual Report.

The Canadian Securities Administrators’ corporate governance guidance suggests that independent directors hold regularly scheduled meetings at which non-independent directors and members of management are not in attendance. The Board believes it is important that the Board of Directors regularly meet without management of the Company, but has also determined that open and candid discussion among independent directors is not necessarily inhibited by the presence of the non-independent directors and their exclusion from such meetings is not always warranted. Formal meeting of the independent directors were held quarterly after every board meeting.

The Board currently does not have an independent Chair, but has appointed a lead independent director. The Board facilitates its independent supervision over management in several ways including the holding of regular board meetings and committee meetings, informal discussions among independent directors and management and by retaining independent consultants where it deems necessary. Each of the standing board committees is also solely comprised of independent directors. Independent supervision is also achieved by the formation of special committees of the independent directors to oversee any matters in which non-independent directors who are members of management may have an interest. In addition, the Board of Directors has direct access to the Company’s external auditors, legal counsel and to any of the Company’s officers.

The independent members of the Board of Directors of the Company for Fiscal 2015 were Andile Mabizela, Bongiwe Ntuli, Colin Clarke and Fikile De Buck. Ralph Havenstein was an independent member of the Board and resigned on June 26, 2015.

The executive (non-independent) directors for Fiscal 2015 were Harold Motaung (President and CEO), Joel Kesler (CCO) and Tumelo Motsisi (Executive Chairman of the Board).

The following table sets forth the record of attendance of board and committee meetings by directors for the 12 months ended December 31, 2015.

 

Director

  

Board Meetings

  

Audit and Risk
Committee

  

Nominating and
Governance
Committee

  

Compensation
Committee

  

Sustainable
Development
Health Social and
Ethics Committee

Fikile De Buck (1) (2) (3)    6 of 6    4 of 4    3 of 3    1 of 4 (5)    4 of 4
Harold Motaung    6 of 6    Not applicable    Not applicable    Not applicable    Not applicable
Tumelo Motsisi    6 of 6    Not applicable    Not applicable    Not applicable    Not applicable
Andile Mabizela (3) (4) (7)    6 of 6    3 of 4 (5)    3 of 3    4 of 4    4 of 4
Bongiwe Ntuli (3) (6) (7)    4 of 6    3 of 4    Not applicable    2 of 4    2 of 4
Colin Clarke (6) (8) (9)    6 of 6    4 of 4    Not applicable    4 of 4    Not applicable
Ralph Havenstein (10)    2 of 6    2 of 4    2 of 3    Not applicable    2 of 4
Fikile De Buck (1) (2) (3)    6 of 6    4 of 4    3 of 3    1 of 4 (5)    4 of 4

Notes:

 

(1) Member of the Nominating and Governance Committee.

 

103


Table of Contents
(2) Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee.
(3) Member of the Sustainable Development Committee.
(4) Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee
(5) Not a member. By invitation only.
(6) Member of the Audit and Risk Committee.
(7) Member of the Compensation Committee
(8) Chair of the Compensation Committee
(9) Lead Independent Director
(10) Resigned on June 26, 2015.

6. C. 2. Orientation and Continuing Education

All new and continuing directors are encouraged to review the Board materials prepared by the Company consisting of filings, Committee Charters, Code of Business Conduct and Guidelines. New Members of the Board have participated in the Company’s Director orientation program. This program is designed to provide new directors with the foundation for a more in-depth familiarity and understanding of the Company and its business operations, industry and key personnel. In addition, directors are provided with continuing education programs, which shall include materials, presentations and programs presented at the Company by management as well as third parties. Directors are also encouraged to participate in appropriate seminars or their own choice.

6. C. 3. Ethical Business Conduct

The Board has adopted a formal ethics policy that applies to all directors, officers and employees of the Company, included in Section B-3 to the Company’s Corporate Governance Policies and Procedures Manual, which is available for download from the Company’s website ( www.atlatsaresources.co.za ). Information contained on or accessible through the Company’s website is not a part of this Annual Report. The Company’s Ethics and Business Conduct Policy is also available on www.sedar.com The Board also believes that the fiduciary duties placed on individual directors by the Company’s governing corporate legislation and the common law and the restrictions placed by applicable corporate legislation on an individual directors’ participation in decisions of the Board in which the director has an interest have been sufficient to ensure that the Board operates independently of management and in the best interests of the Company.

Compliance with the Code of Ethics is monitored by the Nomination and Governance Committee. No departures from the code were identified by the Nominating and Governance Committee during Fiscal 2015. The Board has a number of policies in place designed to ensure that directors exercise independent judgment in matters where a director or officer has a material interest. In those circumstances, the relevant director and officer must declare their interest and in the case of a director, refrain from voting and participating in the matter.

6. C. 4. Nomination of Directors

The Board considers its size each year when it considers the directors to recommend to the Shareholders for election at the annual meeting of Shareholders, taking into account the number required to carry out the Board’s duties effectively and to maintain a diversity of views and experience. The Board has a Nominating and Governance Committee, though the full Board retains responsibility for the recommendation of directors to the Shareholders for election.

6. C. 5. Compensation

The Compensation Committee considers compensation for the directors and senior executive officers and submits its compensation recommendations to the Board for approval.

6. C. 6. Board Committees

The Board has not adopted descriptions for the positions of Board chairman, and the chairman for each of the board committees, but, as at the date of this Annual Report, the roles and responsibilities for the board and for each of the board committees has been described in the Company’s Corporate Governance Policies and Procedures Manual, which is available on the Company’s website at www.atlatsaresources.co.za . Information contained on or accessible through the Company’s website is not a part of this Annual Report.

6. C. 6.1. Audit and Risk Committee

The Audit and Risk Committee is an important element of the Board’s system of monitoring and control. The Audit and Risk Committee meets at least four times a year. All the members of the Audit and Risk Committee are independent non-executive

 

104


Table of Contents

directors, financially literate and have extensive Audit and Risk Committee experience. Current members of the Audit and Risk Committee are Fikile Tebogo De Buck (Chair), Bongiwe Ntuli and Colin Clarke (the Chairman of the Board), Andile Mabizela (Independent non-executive director), the CEO, CFO, the internal auditors (outsourced function) and external auditors attend Audit and Risk Committee meetings on invitation.

The Audit and Risk Committee has been established primarily to assist the Board in overseeing:

 

    the quality and integrity of the Company’s financial statements (including group consolidated financial statements) and public disclosures in respect thereof;

 

    assessing the qualification and independence of the external auditors;

 

    the scope and effectiveness of the external audit function;

 

    the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls;

 

    compliance with legal and regulatory requirements to the extent that it might have an impact on financial statements; and

 

    Assessment of integrated risk management.

In addition to the responsibilities above, the Atlatsa Board has appointed the Audit and Risk Committee to perform on behalf of all South African subsidiaries of Atlatsa, the functions listed in section 94(7) of the South African Companies Act No 71 0f 2008.

The Board has delegated extensive powers to the Audit and Risk Committee in accordance with US corporate governance requirements and as permitted under Canadian Corporate and Securities law and the Company’s Articles to perform the above functions. In line with these requirements, the Audit and Risk Committee has, among other things, determined which categories of non-audit services provided by the external auditors should be pre-approved by the Audit and Risk Committee.

The Audit and Risk Committee meets regularly with the Company’s external auditors and managers to consider risk assessment and management, to review the audit plans of the external auditors, and to review accounting, auditing, financial reporting, and corporate governance and compliance matters. The Audit and Risk Committee approves the external auditors’ engagement letter on the terms, nature and scope of the audit function and the audit fee. Interim and annual results of the Company and trading statements of the Company are reviewed by the Audit and Risk Committee before publication. The Audit and Risk Committee usually makes recommendations and refers matters for information or approval to the Board.

Both the Audit and Risk Committee and the Board of Directors are satisfied of the independence of the external auditors.

6. C. 6.2. Nominating and Governance Committee

The committee is currently comprised of two non-executive directors, all of whom are independent.

Members: Andile Mabizela (Chair) and Fikile Tebogo De Buck.

Ralph Havenstein resigned from the Board and the Committee on June 26, 2015

The Nominating and Governance Committee’s functions include reviewing and making recommendations to the Board on the Company’s general corporate governance framework, the composition and performance of the Board and its committees, appointment of directors and group executive committee members, legal compliance and the Company’s ethics policy and programs.

The Company is in process of identifying and appointing new directors to fill the vacancy of Ralph Havenstein

6. C. 6.3. Compensation Committee

Members: Colin Clarke (Chair), Andile Mabizela and Bongiwe Ntuli.

All the members of the committee, including the chair, are independent non-executive directors. In line with the recommendations of King III (South Africa’s Code of Corporate Governance), the CEO attends the meetings of the committee at the request of the committee, but is requested to leave the meeting before any decisions are made.

The committee evaluates and monitors Atlatsa’s remuneration philosophy and practices, ensures that they are consistent with sound governance principles and management systems and are aligned with the Company’s approach to risk management, in that inappropriate risk taking is not incentivized.

 

105


Table of Contents

Other key terms of reference set out in the mandate of the committee include:

 

    providing guidance on the evaluation of the performance of NEO’s;

 

    determining and recommending to the Board, the remuneration of NEO’s and directors, whose remuneration is subject to shareholder approval;

 

    reviewing and approving total guaranteed package values including the annual short term and long term incentives granted to executive management;

 

    reviewing and approving proposals for annual salary adjustments and proposed changes to benefit fund rules across the Company;

 

    approving the principles, formulae applied and Company performance targets as well as the achievement thereof on which short-term and long-term incentives are based;

 

    reviewing and approving the terms and conditions of the executive directors’ service agreements; and

 

    annually assessing the performance of the committee and the committee members.

6. C. 6.4. Sustainable Development, Health Social and Ethics Committee (“Sustainable Development Committee”)

Members: Andile Mabizela, Bongiwe Ntuli and Fikile De Buck. Ralph Havenstein was the chairman of the Committee until he resigned on June 26, 2015.

The Sustainable Development Committee meets at least four times a year, or more frequently as circumstances dictate.

The objective of the Sustainable Development Committee is to assist the board in ensuring that the Company is and remains a committed socially responsible corporate citizen. The committee’s primary role is to supplement, support, advise and provide guidance on the effectiveness or otherwise of management’s efforts in respect of sustainable development.

The committee considers the following sustainable development issues: occupational health, safety, HIV/Aids, social investment and environmental management.

In addition and in compliance with the Companies Act, the committee monitors the Company’s activities, having regard to any relevant legislation, other legal requirements or prevailing codes of best practice, with regard to matters relating to-

 

  (i) Social and economic development, including the Company’s standing in terms of the goals and purposes of-

 

  a. the 10 principles set out in the United Nations Global Compact Principles;

 

  b. the OECD recommendations regarding corruption;

 

  c. the employment Equity Act; and

 

  d. the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act.

 

  (ii) Good corporate citizenship, including the company’s-

 

  a. promotion of equality, prevention of unfair discrimination and reduction of corruption;

 

  b. contribution to development of the communities in which its activities are predominantly conducted or within which its products or services are predominantly marketed; and

 

  c. record of sponsorship, donations and charitable giving;

 

  (iii) The environment, health and public safety, including the impact of the Company’s activities and of its products or services;

 

  (iv) Consumer relationships, including the company’s advertising, public relations and compliance with consumer protection laws; and

 

  (v) Labour and employment, including-

 

  a. the Company’s standing in terms of the International Labour Organization Protocol on decent work and working conditions; and

 

  b. the company’s employment relationships, and its contribution toward the educational development of its employees.

The Company is in process of identifying and appointing new directors. As at date of filing, Ralph Havenstein’s position on this committee has not be filled.

 

106


Table of Contents

6. C. 6.5. Special Committee

The purpose of the Special Committee is to assist and provide recommendation to the Board of directors when it must make a decision that presents a conflict of interest to some of its members. This arises in situations where directors declare a conflict and are, as a result, precluded from voting, and withdrawal from the board’s deliberations is inadequate.

In addition, a Special Committee may be constituted to evaluate unusual or special transactions which the Board considers require further independent Board consideration.

Members of the Special Committee are appointed on an ad hoc basis. Each member will serve until a replacement for him or her is appointed, or until he or she resigns or is removed from the Board. Members are only appointed as necessary in the event a transaction / or conflict arises for which the Board considers evaluation by the Company’s independent directors is necessary or desirable. The Special Committee will consist of majority of independent directors, unless the Board should from time to time otherwise determine, subject to compliance with applicable law and stock exchange rules. All of the members of the Special Committee will be “independent” as determined under National Instrument 52 110 Audit Committees, the TSX rules, as applicable, the NYSE MKT rules and applicable U.S. securities laws.

No Special Committee was formed during Fiscal 2015.

6. C. 7. Assessments

The Board monitors the adequacy of information given to directors, communication between the Board and management, and the strategic direction and processes of the Board and committees. The Board and its committees have initiated a self-assessment process.

The Board through the Audit and Risk Committee considered and was satisfied that the CFO had and has the necessary competence, qualifications, expertise and experience.

The Board considered and was satisfied that the Company Secretary has the necessary competence, qualifications and experience. The Company Secretary has an arm’s length relationship with the Board and is also not a director of the Company.

The Board is satisfied with the overall project and corporate achievements of the Company and believes this reflects well on the Board and its practices.

6. D. Employees

At December 31, 2015, Atlatsa had no employees in Canada. There were 12 employees (of which six are NEOs) in South Africa who provide administrative and compliance functions to the Company. The Company has, in the past, received many of its services from HDSI. HDSI provided administrative, compliance and management services to Atlatsa, pursuant to an administrative services agreement dated for reference December 31, 1996. Substantially all of the administrative, compliance and management services have now been transitioned to South Africa.

The Company outsources some of its functions to professional consultancy and advisory firms.

Bokoni Mine has approximately 5,200 employees (including 1,900 contractors), including approximately 10 of whom may be considered senior management.

Underground mining operations in South Africa are labour intensive with 60% of operational expenditure at the Bokoni Mine applied to labour. The mine employees are represented by three labour unions and wage negotiations are generally held every two years with a one to two year wage accord being agreed subsequent to such negotiations. The labour agreements in place with the three labour unions do not expire until 2016.

6. E. Share Ownership

ITEM 6.A. above sets out the names of members of the Board of Directors, all major offices and positions with the Company and any of its significant affiliates each holds as of December 31, 2015, each nominee’s principal occupation, the period of time during which each has been a director of the Company and the number of common shares beneficially owned by each, directly or indirectly, or over which each exercised control or direction.

ITEM 6.B . above sets out information regarding options granted to members of the Board of Directors and describes arrangements for involving employees in the capital of the Company.

 

107


Table of Contents

6. F. Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties and Sanctions

6. F.1. Corporate Cease Trade Orders

On August 17, 2015, the British Columbia Securities Commission issued a management cease trade order to Atlatsa for failure to file certain continuous disclosure documents as required by applicable securities law. Harold Motaung and Boipelo Lekubo each were subject to the cease trade order. Atlatsa subsequently filed the documents that were the subject of the initial default and the management cease trade order was revoked by the British Columbia Securities Commission on December 11, 2015.

Other than the above, to the knowledge of the Board of Directors, no director or executive officer of the Company is, at the date hereof, or was within the ten years before the date hereof, a director, CEO or CFO of any company that: (i) was subject to a cease trade order or similar order, or an order that denied the relevant company access to any exemption under securities legislation, that was in effect for a period of more than 30 consecutive days, that was issued while that person was acting in the capacity as director, CEO or CFO; or (ii) was subject to a cease trade or similar order, or an order that denied the relevant company access to any exemption under securities legislation, that was in effect for a period of more than 30 consecutive days, that was issued after that person ceased to be a director, CEO or CFO and which resulted from an event that occurred while that person was acting in the capacity as director, CEO or CFO.

6. F.2. Bankruptcies

To the knowledge of the Board of Directors, no director or executive officer of the Company, or shareholder holding a sufficient number of securities of the Company to effect materially the control of the Company: (i) is, at the date hereof, or has been within the ten years before the date hereof, a director or executive officer of any company that, while that person was acting in that capacity, or within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or has a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets; or (ii) has, within the ten years before the date hereof, become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or became subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold such persons assets.

6. F.3. Penalties or Sanctions

To the knowledge of the Board of Directors, no director of executive officer of the Company, or a shareholder holding a sufficient number of Securities of the Company to affect materially the control of the Company has been subject to any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities legislation or by a securities regulatory authority has entered into a settlement agreement with a securities authority or any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision.

6. G. Conflicts of Interest

To the best of Atlatsa’s knowledge, no actual or potential conflict of interest exists between Atlatsa, or any subsidiary, and any director or officer of Atlatsa or any subsidiary.

 

108


Table of Contents

 

ITEM 7 MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

7. A. Major Shareholders

Atlatsa’s securities are recorded on the books of its transfer agent in registered form, however, the majority of such shares are registered in the name of intermediaries such as brokerage houses and clearing houses on behalf of their respective brokerage clients, and Atlatsa does not have knowledge of or access to information about the beneficial owners thereof. To the best of its knowledge, Atlatsa is not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by a foreign government. On May 21, 2004, shareholders of the Company approved an increase in the authorized share capital from 200,000,000 common shares without par value to an unlimited number of common shares without par value.

Under the British Columbia Securities Act insiders (generally officers, directors, and holders of 10% or more of Atlatsa’s shares) are required to file insider reports of changes in their ownership within ten days of a trade in Atlatsa’s securities. Copies of such reports are available for public inspection at the offices of the British Columbia Securities Commission, 9th Floor, 701 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V7Y 1L2 (phone (604) 899-6500) or at Canadian Securities Administrators website for Insiders’ Disclosure, www.sedi.ca.

As at February 29, 2016, to the knowledge of the directors and executive officers of Atlatsa, the only persons who beneficially own, directly or indirectly, or control or direct, five percent (5%) or more of the issued and outstanding Atlatsa shares are as follows:

 

Shareholder Name and Address

   Number of
Shares Held
     Percentage of
Issued
Common
Shares
 

The Pelawan Trust, as Trustee (1)

Atlatsa Holdings Investments Proprietary Limited, as Beneficiary

4th Floor, 82 Grayston Drive

Sandton, 2196, South Africa

     342,896,438         61.85

Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited

55 Marshall Street

Johannesburg, 2001, South Africa

     125,000,000         22.6

Mr. Tumelo M. Motsisi (2)

4th Floor, 82 Grayston Drive

Sandton, South Africa

    

 

 

83,111,143

(82,295,145 as part of the 342,896,438

shown above, see note 2 below)

  

  

  

     15.0

Notes:

 

(1) These shares are registered in the name of Pelawan Trust, which holds such shares in trust for Atlatsa Holdings pursuant to escrow arrangements described in ITEM 4. A.2. General Development of the Business .
(2) Indirect holdings being 240 of the 1,000 ordinary shares in the issued and outstanding share capital of Atlatsa Holdings, multiplied by the number of common shares of Atlatsa (342,896,438) held by the Pelawan Trust. Therefore, 82,295,145 of these shares are held as an indirect interest in the 342,896,438 shares shown above.

No major shareholders have different voting rights.

As noted in the table above, the Company is indirectly controlled by Atlatsa Holdings through the Pelawan Trust, as a result of the Pelawan transaction (see ITEM 4. A.2. General Development of the Business ).

The information in the table above was supplied by Computershare Trust Company of Canada, the Company’s registrar and transfer agent, and by the individuals themselves.

 

109


Table of Contents

As of March 16, 2016, the number of registered shareholders of record (and the number and percentage of shares held by such shareholders) is as follows:

 

Location    Number of registered
shareholders of record
     Number of
shares
     Percentage of
total shares
 

Canada

     34         12,438,891         2.24

United States

     29         41,110,395         7.42

South Africa

     986         500,857,520         90.34

Other

     1         15,000         0.00
     1,050         554,421,806         100.00

Pursuant to the Bokoni Transaction at July 1, 2009, the Company issued 4,497,062 common shares to the Bokoni Platinum Mine ESOP Trust and 9,799,505 to the Atlatsa Community Participation Trust. See ITEM 4. A.7.5. Share Ownership Trusts.

As of February 29, 2016 the Company has 554,421,806 common shares outstanding.

Shares registered in intermediaries are assumed to be held by residents of the same country in which the clearing house is located.

7. B. Related Party Transactions

See Section 1.14 “Transactions with Related Parties” in the MD&A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, which was furnished on EDGAR on Form 6-K on March 30, 2016 and is specifically incorporated by references herein in its entirety.

7. C. Interests of Experts and Counsel

No technical experts named in this Annual Report have any registered or beneficial interest, directly or indirectly in any securities or property of Atlatsa or any of Atlatsa’s affiliates or associates.

 

110


Table of Contents

 

ITEM 8 FINANCIAL INFORMATION

8. A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted IFRS following approval from the Canadian Securities Administrators under National Instrument 52-107, Acceptable Accounting Principles, Auditing Standards and Reporting Currency. The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in compliance with IFRS (see ITEM 18 below for the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal 2015 ).

Legal Proceedings

As of February 29, 2016, there are pending litigation claims at year end to which Bokoni Mine is a defendant. The possible obligation amounts to $481,135 (ZAR5,378,210).

No other material legal or arbitration proceedings against Atlatsa or any of its subsidiaries, nor, to the knowledge of Atlatsa, are such proceedings pending or threatened that may have or have had in the previous 12 months a material effect on Atlatsa’s financial position.

As of February 29, 2016, no penalties or sanctions have been imposed against Atlatsa by a court relating to securities legislation or by a securities regulatory authority, nor has Atlatsa entered into any settlement agreements with a court relating to securities legislation or with a securities regulatory authority.

Dividend Policy

The Company has not paid any dividends on its outstanding common shares since its incorporation and does not anticipate that it will do so in the foreseeable future. All funds of Atlatsa are being retained to fund current operations at the Bokoni Mine, to service current debt facilities and for exploration of its projects.

8. B. Significant Changes

See note 43 of the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal 2015 for “ events after the reporting date” .

 

111


Table of Contents

 

ITEM 9 THE OFFER AND LISTING

9. A. Offer and Listing Details

High and Low Market Prices and Volume Traded

 

     TSX Exchange: ATL      NYSE: ATL*     JSE: ATL  
     High
CAD
     Low
CAD
     Volume      High
USD
    Low
USD
    Volume     High
ZAR
     Low
ZAR
     Volume  

Annual

                       

2015

     0.28         0.03         3,023,452         0.23        0.02        13,585,381        2.55         0.03         4,857,158   

2014

     0.71         0.155         1,946,915         0.67        0.15        19,151,612        6.30         1.99         4,810,148   

2013

     0.61         0.14         4,893,290         0.59        0.15        39,503,994        6.20         1.45         11,045,462   

2012

     0.66         0.12         3,759,845         0.63        0.11        27,159,321        4.73         1.15         5,940,344   

2011

     1.58         0.33         8,361,610         1.66        0.31        62,512,721        11.50         3.30         6,904,276   

By Quarter

                       

Calendar 2011

                       

First Quarter

     1.58         0.91         2,955,381         1.66        0.93        21,133,516        11.50         7.01         2,004,419   

Second Quarter

     1.25         0.58         2,701,173         1.35        0.59        24,459,222        8.68         4.50         2,430,448   

Third Quarter

     0.73         0.48         1,761,687         0.78        0.42        10,672,991        5.70         3.50         1,772,344   

Fourth Quarter

     0.63         0.33         943,369         0.67        0.31        6,246,992        5.00         3.30         697,065   

Calendar 2012

                       

First Quarter

     0.66         0.37         1,414,401         0.63        0.38        405,554        4.73         3.30         1,742,747   

Second Quarter

     0.41         0.19         405,554         0.44        0.11        6,375,131        3.68         1.70         1,816,802   

Third Quarter

     0.24         0.12         1,087,967         0.27        0.12        8,042,528        2.05         1.20         1,791,563   

Fourth Quarter

     0.24         0.14         851,923         0.24        0.11        5,253,315        1.79         1.15         589,232   

Calendar 2013

                       

First Quarter

     0.27         0.14         1,434,074         0.24        0.15        9,439,920        2.6         1.45         1,610,246   

Second Quarter

     0.23         0.16         1,254,118         0.25        0.18        7,508,546        2.8         1.50         1,215,394   

Third Quarter

     0.50         0.22         711,194         0.50        0.19        10,500,138        4.5         1.86         5,749,878   

Fourth Quarter

     0.61         0.34         1,493,904         0.59        0.36        12,055,390        6.2         3.45         2,469,944   

Calendar 2014

                       

First Quarter

     0.71         0.45         1,047,842         0.67        0.41        8,221,690        6.3         2.02         1,389,191   

Second Quarter

     0.54         0.36         350,619         0.49        0.36        3,091,774        5.3         3.84         833,241   

Third Quarter

     0.49         0.26         203,251         0.45        0.23        2,914,687        4.8         2.90         1,569,591   

Fourth Quarter

     0.32         0.16         345,203         0.32        0.15        4,923,461        3.4         1.99         1,018,125   

Calendar 2015

                       

First Quarter

     0.20         0.20         10,224         0.18        0.17        59,326        2.23         2.17         25,558   

Second Quarter

     0.14         0.13         7,277         0.14        0.12        53,956        1.64         1.58         12,640   

Third Quarter

     0.05         0.04         41,963         0.04        0.04        67,724        0.62         0.58         25,667   

Fourth Quarter

     0.04         0.04         10,267         0.03        0.03        42,292        0.48         0.46         13,217   

Monthly

                       

January 2015

     0.22         0.21         10,220         0.19        0.18        71,927        2.30         2.21         25,061   

February 2015

     0.21         0.21         6,172         0.19        0.17        70,886        2.28         2.21         35,542   

March 2015

     0.18         0.17         15,631         0.17        0.15        37,887        2.13         2.08         16,956   

April 2015

     0.17         0.16         13,510         0.15        0.14        59,241        1.79         1.73         14,749   

May 2015

     0.14         0.14         5,125         0.13        0.12        67,686        1.64         1.58         7,551   

June 2015

     0.11         0.11         2,893         0.13        0.11        36,430        1.51         1.43         15,578   

July 2015

     0.07         0.06         21,962         0.06        0.06        110,797        0.91         0.86         17,644   

August 2015

     0.03         0.03         84,366         0.03     0.03     56,016     0.46         0.40         31,762   

September 2015

     0.03         0.03         20,505         0.03     0.03     34,790     0.46         0.44         28,651   

October 2015

     0.04         0.04         16,529         0.03     0.03     41,071     0.55         0.53         5,456   

November 2015

     0.04         0.04         12,607         0.03     0.03     70,354     0.47         0.46         10,809   

December 2015

     0.03         0.03         3,125         0.03     0.02     23,412     0.43         0.40         23,756   

January 2016

     0.03         0.03         7,359         0.02     0.02     14,781     0.40         0.40         33,289   

February 2016

     0.02         0.02         12,770         0.03     0.03     20,513     0.47         0.47         17,727   

 

* On July 10, 2015, the Company announced its intention to file a Form 25 (Notification of Removal from Listing and/or Registration under section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) with the SEC to voluntarily withdraw its common shares from listing on the NYSE MKT. The Company filed the Form 25 on July 20, 2015 and the delisting was effective 10 days following the filing of the Form 25. Trading information in this chart for periods following July 2015 represents trading on the over the counter markets in the United States.

9. B. Plan of Distribution

Not applicable.

9.C. Markets

Atlatsa’s common shares are listed and posted for trading in Canada on the TSX under the symbol ATL. Atlatsa’s common shares traded on the TSX-V (and its predecessors, the Canadian Venture Exchange and the Vancouver Stock Exchange) since

 

112


Table of Contents

September 24, 1987 until the Company migrated to the TSX on February 5, 2014. Until March 12, 2004, Atlatsa’s common shares traded in the United States on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”) under the symbol ARQ.RF. Commencing March 15, 2004, Atlatsa’s common shares were traded in the United States on NYSE MKT under the symbol ATL until July 30, 2015. Atlatsa’s common shares also commenced trading on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange in South Africa under the symbol ARQ in December 2006 and from May, 14 2012 under ATL.

The Company had a primary listing on the TSX and has a secondary listing on the JSE.

On July 10, 2015, the Company announced its intention to file a Form 25 (Notification of Removal from Listing and/or Registration under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) with the SEC to voluntarily withdraw its common shares from listing on the NYSE MKT. The Company filed the Form 25 on July 20, 2015 and the delisting was effective 10 days following the filing of the Form 25. The Company remains an SEC registrant and will review this position prior to the first anniversary of the delisting off the NYSE MKT. The Company’s common shares continue to be listed on the TSX and the JSE.

9. D. Selling Shareholders

Not applicable.

9. E. Dilution

Not applicable.

9. F. Expenses of the Issue

Not applicable.

9. G. Escrow Securities

The following table sets out the number of securities of the Company held, to the knowledge of the management of the Company, in escrow as of February 29, 2016 and the percentage that number represents of the outstanding securities of that class.

 

Designation of Class

   Number of Securities held
in Escrow
     Approximate Percentage of Class  

Common shares (1)

     342,896,438         62 % (2) 

Notes:

 

(1) These shares are registered in the name of the Pelawan Trust, which holds such shares in trust for Atlatsa Holdings pursuant to escrow arrangements described in “The Acquisition - Description of lock-in Arrangements for Consideration Shares” in the August 2004 Circular. As part of the Refinancing Plan (see ITEM 4. A.5. Refinance Plan (2012-2014) ), Atlatsa Holdings will provide security to RPM in relation to the Atlatsa Holdings Vendor Finance Loan by way of a pledge and cession of its entire shareholding in Atlatsa, which shares remain subject to a lock-in arrangement through to 2020. The total number of shares held by the Pelawan Trust at February 29, 2016 was 342.9 million and in total pledged to RPM.

Pursuant to implementation of the Bokoni Transaction, Atlatsa Holdings, the sole beneficiary of the Pelawan Trust, which is the controlling shareholder of Atlatsa, established a special purpose vehicle as a wholly owned subsidiary of Atlatsa Holdings (the “Pelawan SPV”). During the conversion and the subsequent forward sale of the shares as per the Refinancing Plan; Pelawan SPV transferred 56,691,303 of its Atlatsa shareholding to the Pelawan Trust. These shares remain subject to the lock-in arrangements described above.

The Pelawan Trust holds 227,400,000 Atlatsa common shares after the conversion of the “B” preference shares on January 14, 2014. These shares remain subject to the lock-in arrangements described above.

 

(2) This percentage disclosed relates to the number of shares held in escrow, divided by the number of common shares outstanding, before dilution, as at February 29, 2016, being 554,421,806.

 

113


Table of Contents

 

ITEM 10 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

10. A. Share Capital

Common shares

The authorized share capital of the Company consists of an unlimited number of common shares without par value.

The issued share capital of the Company consists of 554,288,473 common shares, without par value, as at December 31, 2014 and 554,421,806 as at February 28, 2015.

 

Description

   Number of shares  

Closing balance – December 31, 2013

     201,888,473   

Conversion of the “B” Preference Shares – January 14, 2014

     227,400,000   

New issuance to RPM – January 31, 2014

     125,000,000   

Closing balance - December 31, 2014

     554,288,473   

New issuance

     133,333   

Total

     554,421,806   
  

 

 

 

Each common share carries one vote at all meetings of shareholders, participates rateably in any dividend declared by the directors and carries the right to receive a proportionate share of the assets of the Company available for distribution to holders of common shares in the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company. The holders of common shares have no pre-emptive or conversion rights.

Preference shares

115,800 B2 Convertible preference shares (authorized and issued) of $0.1481 each and 111,600 B3 Convertible preference shares (authorized and issued) of $0.1481 were issued during the year ended December 31, 2009.

On January 14, 2014, the “B” Preference Shares were converted into Atlatsa common shares. Pursuant to the conversion of the “B” Preference Shares, RPM received 115.8 million common shares in the Company and Pelawan SPV received 111.6 million common shares in the Company. RPM, in turn, sold its 115.8 million shares to Atlatsa Holdings to increase Atlatsa Holding’s interest to 61.85%. Pelawan SPV transferred 168,291,303 common shares in Atlatsa, being all of their shareholdings in Atlatsa to Atlatsa Holdings on January 29, 2014 by way of a dividend in specie.

10. B. Notice of Articles and Articles

Atlatsa’s Articles and Notice of Articles are filed with the British Columbia Registrar of Companies under Certificate of Incorporation No. 262963. A copy of the Articles and Memorandum was filed with Atlatsa’s initial registration on Form 20-F filed in March 2000.

The Company was transitioned under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) (the “BCA”) on June 11, 2004, on which date the Company altered its Notice of Articles (which replaced the Memorandum) to change its authorized share structure from 200,000,000 common shares without par value to an unlimited number of common shares without par value.

Objects and Purposes

Atlatsa’s Articles do not specify objects or purposes. Under British Columbia law, a British Columbia company has all the legal powers of a natural person. Corporations formed under the BCA may not undertake certain limited business activities (for example, operating as a trust company or railroad) without alterations to its form of articles and specific government consent.

Directors – Powers and Limitations

Atlatsa’s Articles do not specify a maximum number of directors but do specify that the Company shall have a minimum of three directors while the Company is a public company. The number of directors is determined annually by the shareholders at the annual general meeting of shareholders and all directors are elected at that time; there are no staggered directorships. Under the Articles the directors are entitled between successive annual general meetings to appoint one or more additional directors but not more than one-third of the number of directors fixed pursuant to the Articles and in effect at the last general meeting at which directors were elected. Directors automatically retire at each annual general meeting and such directors may be re-elected by the shareholders entitled to vote thereat.

 

114


Table of Contents

Under the Articles, a director who is, in any way, directly or indirectly interested in a proposed contract or transaction with Atlatsa or who holds any office or possesses any property whereby, directly or indirectly, a duty or interest might be created which would conflict with his duty or interest as a director shall declare the nature and extent of his interest in such contract or transaction. A director shall not vote in respect of any such contract or transaction with the Company in which he is interested and if he should vote his vote shall not be counted but he shall be counted in the quorum present at the meeting. Similarly, under the BCA directors are obligated to abstain from voting to approve a contract or transaction in which they have a disclosable interest (generally contracts or transactions in which they have a material interest) after fully disclosing such interest, otherwise they are liable to account to the Company for any profits that accrue to the directors as a result of such contract or transaction. Therefore, directors must abstain in such circumstances both under the Articles and under the BCA. Directors’ compensation is not a matter on which they must abstain.

Directors must be of the age of majority (18), and meet eligibility criteria, including not being mentally infirm, not being an undischarged bankrupt, and not having fraud related convictions in the previous five years. There is no mandatory retirement age either under Atlatsa’s Articles or under the BCA. Directors need not own any shares of Atlatsa in order to qualify as directors.

Directors’ borrowing powers are not restricted but the directors may not authorize Atlatsa to make a payment to purchase or redeem its share if doing so would render it insolvent.

Rights of Common Shareholders

Dividends may be declared by the Board out of available assets and are paid ratably to holders of common shares. No dividend may be paid if Atlatsa is, or would thereby become, insolvent.

Each Atlatsa common share is entitled to one vote on matters to which common shares ordinarily vote including the election of directors, appointment of auditors and approval of corporate changes and other matters requiring shareholder approval.

Atlatsa has no redeemable securities authorized or issued.

There are no pre-emptive rights applicable to Atlatsa which provide a right to any person to participate in offerings of Atlatsa’s securities.

All common shares of Atlatsa participate ratably in any available assets in the event of a winding up or other liquidation.

Changes to Rights of Common Shareholders

Certain changes to the Articles and Notice of Articles of Atlatsa require a “special resolution”, being a resolution passed by not less than 75% of the shares voted in person or by proxy at a duly convened shareholders meeting. Certain corporate changes, including amalgamation with another company, sale of substantially all of Atlatsa’s assets, and redomiciling out of the jurisdiction of British Columbia, not only require such 75% approval but generally also give rise to a dissent right, which is the right to be paid an agreed amount for a shareholder’s shares if the required special resolution is actually passed and Atlatsa elects to proceed with the matter notwithstanding receipt of dissent notices. A notice of a shareholders meeting at which such an action is intended to be effected must include a statement advising of the dissent right. Dissent provisions are governed by the BCA and not by the Articles of the Company.

Shareholders Meetings

Shareholders meetings are only peripherally governed by the Articles of the Company, with most shareholder protections contained in the Securities Act (British Columbia) and related securities law instruments and the BCA. The Articles provide that Atlatsa will hold an annual general meeting once in every calendar year and not more than 13 months since the last meeting and provide for certain procedural matters and rules of order with respect to conduct of the meeting. The Securities Act (British Columbia) and related securities law instruments and the BCA superimpose requirements that generally provide that shareholders meetings require advance notification within prescribed times and which govern the content and timing of mailing to shareholders of information circulars and proxies, as well as other matters typically governed by securities legislation. This legislation specifies the disclosure requirements for various corporate actions, background information on the nominees for election of directors, executive compensation paid in the previous year and full details of any unusual meeting matters. Generally, registered shareholders of Atlatsa as of the record date set in respect of a shareholders meeting are entitled to vote at the meeting and any adjournment thereof.

 

115


Table of Contents

No Limitation on Foreign Ownership

There are no limitations under Atlatsa’s Articles or in the BCA on the right of persons who are not citizens of Canada to hold or vote common shares. (See also ITEM 10D – “Exchange Controls” , below.)

Change in Control

Atlatsa has not implemented any shareholders’ rights or other “poison pill” protection against possible take-over. Atlatsa does not have any agreements which are triggered by a take-over or other change of control. There are no provisions in its Articles triggered by or affected by a change in outstanding shares which gives rise to a change in control.

Share Ownership Reporting

The Articles of Atlatsa do not require disclosure of share ownership. Share ownership of director nominees must be reported annually in proxy materials sent to Atlatsa’s shareholders. There are no requirements under British Columbia corporate law to report ownership of shares of Atlatsa but the Securities Act (British Columbia) requires disclosure of trading by insiders (including holders of 10% of voting shares) within 10 days of the trade. Controlling shareholders (generally those in excess of 20% of outstanding shares) must provide seven days advance notice of share sales.

10. C. Material Contracts

Except for contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business, the material contracts entered into by Atlatsa in the two fiscal years immediately preceding this Annual Report are the following:

1. First Amendment And Restatement Agreement To The Senior Facilities Agreement between Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited, N2C Resources Inc., N1C Resources Inc., Bokoni Platinum Holdings Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Mines Proprietary Limited, Atlatsa Resources Corporation, Micawber 603 Proprietary Limited, Micawber 634 Proprietary Limited relating to the Amended and Restated Senior Facilities Agreement dated December 9, 2015.

2. Facility Agreement – R334 000 000 Term Loan Facility provided by Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited as Lender and Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited as Borrower dated December 9, 2015.

3. First Amendment and Restated Agreement to the Working Capital Facility Agreement between Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited as Lender and Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited as Borrower and Bokoni Platinum Holdings Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Mines Proprietary Limited, Atlatsa Resources Corporation dated May 21, 2015.

10. D. Exchange Controls

Atlatsa is a corporation registered in Province of British Columbia, Canada. There is no law or governmental decree or regulation in Canada that restricts the export or import of capital, or affects the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to a non-resident holder of common shares, other than withholding tax requirements. Any such remittances to United States residents are generally subject to withholding tax. (See ITEM 10E – “Taxation” , below).

There is no limitation imposed by the laws of Canada or by the charter or other constituent documents of Atlatsa on the right of a non-resident to hold or vote the common shares, other than as provided in the Investment Canada Act (Canada) (the “ Investment Act ”). The following discussion summarizes the material features of the Investment Act for a non-resident who proposes to acquire a controlling number of common shares. It is general only, it is not a substitute for independent advice from an investor’s own advisor, and it does not anticipate statutory or regulatory amendments. Atlatsa does not believe the Investment Act will have any effect on it or on its non-Canadian shareholders due to a number of factors, including the nature of its operations and Atlatsa’s relatively small capitalization.

The Investment Act generally prohibits implementation of a reviewable investment by an individual, government or agency thereof, corporation, partnership, trust or joint venture (each an “entity”) that is not a “Canadian” as defined in the Investment Act (a “non-Canadian”), unless after review the Director of Investments appointed by the minister responsible for the Investment Act is satisfied that the investment is likely to be of net benefit to Canada. The size and nature of a proposed transaction may give rise to an obligation to notify the Director to seek an advance ruling. An investment in the common shares by a non-Canadian other than a “WTO Investor” (as that term is defined in the Investment Act and which term includes entities which are nationals of or are controlled by nationals of member states of the World Trade Organization) when Atlatsa was not controlled by a WTO Investor, would be reviewable under the Investment Act if it was an investment to acquire control of Atlatsa and the value of the assets of Atlatsa, as determined in accordance with the regulations promulgate one third under the Investment Act,

 

116


Table of Contents

was $5 million or more, or if an order for review was made by the federal cabinet on the grounds that the investment related to Canada’s cultural heritage or national identity, regardless of the value of the assets of Atlatsa. An investment in the common shares by a WTO Investor, or by a non-Canadian when Atlatsa was controlled by a WTO Investor, would be reviewable under the Investment Act if it was an investment to acquire control of Atlatsa and the value of the assets of Atlatsa, as determined in accordance with the regulations promulgated under the Investment Act , was not less than a specified amount, which for 2008 is CAD 295 million. A non-Canadian would acquire control of Atlatsa for the purposes of the Investment Act if the non-Canadian acquired a majority of the common shares. The acquisition of less than a majority but one third or more of the common shares would be presumed to be an acquisition of control of Atlatsa unless it could be established that, on the acquisition, Atlatsa was not controlled in fact by the acquirer through the ownership of the common shares.

The foregoing assumes Atlatsa will not engage in the production of uranium or own an interest in a producing uranium property in Canada, provide any financial service or transportation service or engage in a “cultural business”, as the rules governing these businesses are different.

Certain transactions relating to the common shares would be exempt from the Investment Act , including

 

(a) an acquisition of the common shares by a person in the ordinary course of that person’s business as a trader or dealer in securities,

 

(b) an acquisition of control of Atlatsa in connection with the realization of security granted for a loan or other financial assistance and not for a purpose related to the provisions of the Investment Act , and

 

(c) an acquisition of control of Atlatsa by reason of an amalgamation, merger, consolidation or corporate reorganization following which the ultimate direct or indirect control in fact of Atlatsa, through the ownership of the common shares, remained unchanged.

10. E. Taxation

Material Canadian Federal Income Tax Consequences for United States Residents

The following, in management’s understanding, summarizes the principal Canadian federal income tax consequences generally applicable to the holding and disposition of common shares by a holder (in this summary, a “U.S. Holder”) who, at all relevant times, (a) for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Tax Act”), is not resident in Canada, deals at arm’s length with Atlatsa, holds the common shares as capital property and does not use or hold the common shares in the course of carrying on, or otherwise in connection with, a business in Canada, and (b) for the purposes of the Canada-United States Tax Convention, 1980 (the “Treaty”), is a resident solely of the United States, is entitled to the full benefits of the Treaty, has never been a resident of Canada, and has not held or used (and does not hold or use) common shares in connection with a permanent establishment or fixed base in Canada. This summary does not apply to traders or dealers in securities, persons who acquired their common shares in a transaction considered for purposes of the Tax Act to be an adventure or concern in the nature of trade, limited liability companies, tax-exempt entities, insurers, financial institutions (including those to which the mark-to-market provisions of the Tax Act apply), or any other U.S. Holder to which special considerations apply.

This summary is based on the current provisions of the Tax Act including all regulations there under, the Treaty, all proposed amendments to the Tax Act, the regulations and the Treaty publicly announced by or on behalf of the Minister of Finance to the date hereof, and the current published administrative practices of the Canada Revenue Agency. It has been assumed that all currently proposed amendments will be enacted as proposed and that there will be no other relevant change in any governing law or administrative practice, although no assurances can be given in these respects. This summary does not take into account provincial, U.S., state or other foreign income tax law or practice. The tax consequences to any particular U.S. Holder will vary according to the status of that holder as an individual, trust, corporation or other entity, the jurisdictions in which that holder is subject to taxation, and generally according to that holder’s particular circumstances. Accordingly, this summary is not, and is not to be construed as, Canadian tax advice to any particular U.S. Holder. U.S. Holders should consult with their own tax advisors for advice with respect to their own particular circumstances.

Dividends

Dividends paid or credited or deemed to be paid or credited to a U.S. Holder by Atlatsa will normally be subject to Canadian withholding tax. Under the Treaty, the rate of withholding tax on dividends paid to a U.S. Holder and that beneficially owns such dividends is generally limited to 15% of the gross amount of the dividend (or 5% if the U.S. Holder is a corporation and beneficially owns at least 10% of Atlatsa’s voting shares). Atlatsa will be required to withhold the applicable withholding tax from any such dividend and remit it to the Canadian government for the U.S. Holder’s account.

 

117


Table of Contents

Disposition

A U.S. Holder is not subject to tax under the Tax Act in respect of a gain realized on the disposition of a Common Share (other than to Atlatsa) provided that the share is not “taxable Canadian property” to the holder thereof. If the common shares are listed on a designated stock exchange, which currently includes the NYSE MKT, a Common Share generally will not be taxable Canadian property to a U.S. Holder if, at any time during the 60 months preceding the disposition, the U.S. Holder or persons with whom the U.S. Holder did not deal at arm’s length alone or together owned 25% or more of Atlatsa’s issued shares of any class or series and more than 50% of the fair market value of the Common Share was derived directly or indirectly from one or any combination of: (i) real or immovable property situated in Canada; (ii) Canadian resource properties (as defined in the Tax Act); (iii) timber resource properties (as defined in the Tax Act); or (iv) options in respect of, interests in or rights in the properties described in (i) to (iii) above (whether or not such property exists).

A U.S. Holder whose common shares do constitute taxable Canadian property, and who might therefore be liable for Canadian income tax under the Tax Act on a disposition or deemed disposition of such shares, will generally be relieved from such liability under the Treaty unless the value of the shares of the Company at the time of disposition is derived principally from real property situated in Canada within the meaning of the Treaty. Management of Atlatsa believes that the value of Atlatsa’s common shares is not currently derived principally from real property situated in Canada. U.S. Holders whose common shares are taxable Canadian property should consult their own advisors regarding filing and other Canadian federal tax considerations.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations

The following discussion summarizes certain U.S. federal income tax considerations relating to the ownership and disposition of the Common Shares. It applies only to U.S. Holders (as defined below) that acquire and hold the Common Shares as capital assets (generally, property held for investment purposes). This discussion does not address all the U.S. federal income tax considerations that may be relevant to U.S. Holders in light of their particular circumstances or to holders subject to special rules, including brokers, dealers in securities or currencies, traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for securities holdings, tax-exempt organizations (including private foundations), insurance companies, banks, thrifts and other financial institutions, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies, persons liable for the alternative minimum tax, persons that hold an interest in an entity that holds the Common Shares, persons that own, or have owned, directly, indirectly or constructively 10% or more (by vote or value) of Atlatsa’s voting shares for U.S. federal income tax purposes, persons holding the Common Shares as part of a hedging transaction, wash sale, straddle, conversion transaction or other integrated transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes, persons entering into a “constructive sale” with respect to the Common Shares for U.S. federal income tax purposes, persons that have a functional currency for U.S. federal income tax purposes other than the U.S. dollar, certain former citizens or long-term residents of the United States, or entities classified as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Furthermore, it does not address any aspect of any non-U.S., state, local or estate or gift taxation or the 3.8% tax imposed on certain net investment income.

U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisers regarding the application of the U.S. federal income tax, estate and gift, and alternative minimum tax laws, as well as any consequences arising under the laws of any non-U.S., state and local tax jurisdiction.

This discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“the Code”), administrative pronouncements or rulings, judicial decisions and final, temporary and proposed U.S. Treasury regulations, in each case as in effect on the date hereof, and any of which are subject to change (possibly on a retroactive basis), or differing interpretations, so as to result in U.S. federal income tax consequences different from those discussed herein.

For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of the Common Shares that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is (i) a citizen or individual resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, created or organized under the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof, (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source, or (iv) a trust, if the trust validly elects to be treated as a U.S. person for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or if (A) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over its administration and (B) one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all of the substantial decisions of the trust.

If a partnership, or any other entity or arrangement that is treated as a partnership for U.S. federal tax income tax purposes, holds the Common Shares, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner in or owner of such partnership or pass-through entity will generally depend on the status of the partner or owner and on the activities of the partnership or pass-through entity. Partnerships or any pass-through entities that hold the Common Shares and partners in or owners of such partnerships or pass-through entities should consult their own tax advisers as to the particular U.S. federal income tax consequences of owning and disposing of the Common Shares.

 

118


Table of Contents

Distributions on Common Shares

In general, subject to the passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) rules discussed below, the gross amount of any distributions made to a U.S. Holder on the Common Shares (including amounts withheld to pay Canadian withholding taxes) will constitute a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent paid out of Atlatsa’s current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A distribution in excess of Atlatsa’s current and accumulated earnings and profits will be treated as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the Common Shares on which the distribution is paid, and as a capital gain to the extent it exceeds a U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the Common Shares.

A distribution on the Common Shares will generally be foreign-source income for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes, and should generally constitute “passive category income.” A U.S. Holder may be eligible, subject to a number of complex limitations, to claim a foreign tax credit in respect of any Canadian withholding taxes imposed on dividends received on the Common Shares. A U.S. Holder who does not elect to claim a foreign tax credit for foreign income tax withheld may instead deduct the taxes withheld, but only for a year in which the holder elects to do so for all creditable foreign income taxes. The U.S. foreign tax credit rules are complex, and U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisers regarding the availability of the foreign tax credit based on their particular circumstances.

Provided that Atlatsa is not treated as a PFIC for the taxable years ending December 31, 2015 and 2016, Atlatsa should be considered a “qualified foreign corporation,” and therefore distributions, if any, to non-corporate U.S. Holders that are treated as dividends should qualify for a reduced rate of tax for dividends received on or before December 31, 2016. As discussed below, Atlatsa believes that it was not a PFIC for the 2015 taxable year but has not made a determination of its PFIC status for the 2016 taxable year. If Atlatsa is a PFIC under the rules discussed below, distributions will be taxable at the higher ordinary income tax rates. Dividends on Common Shares will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction generally available to U.S. Holders that are corporations.

The amount of any dividend paid to U.S. Holders in Canadian dollars (including amounts withheld to pay Canadian withholding taxes) will be includible in income in a U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date of receipt, regardless of whether the dividend is in fact converted into U.S. dollars. If the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. Holder should not be required to recognize foreign currency exchange gain or loss in respect of the dividend. A U.S. Holder may have foreign currency exchange gain or loss if the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars after the date of receipt. In general, foreign currency exchange gain or loss will be treated as U.S.-source ordinary gain or loss for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes.

 

119


Table of Contents

Sale, Redemption, or other Taxable Disposition of Common Shares

In general, a U.S. Holder will recognize gain or loss upon the sale, redemption, or other taxable disposition of the Common Shares equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale or other taxable disposition and the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in its Common Shares. Gain or loss recognized by a U.S. Holder will generally be treated as U.S.-source gain or loss. Subject to the PFIC rules discussed below, gain or loss on the disposition of Common Shares will be capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder held the Common Shares for more than one year. An individual U.S. Holder may be entitled to preferential rates of taxation for net long-term capital gains; the deductibility of capital losses is limited under the Code.

Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules

A non-U.S. corporation will be considered a PFIC for any taxable year in which (1) 75% or more of its gross income is “passive income” under the PFIC rules or (2) 50% or more of the average quarterly value of its assets produce (or are held for the production of) “passive income.” For this purpose, “passive income” generally includes interest, dividends, rents, royalties, certain gains from the sale of commodities and certain gains. Interest, dividends, rents and royalties received from a related person (within the meaning of the PFIC rules) are excluded from passive income to the extent such payments are properly allocable to the active income of such related person. Moreover, for purposes of determining if the non-U.S. corporation is a PFIC, if the non-U.S. corporation owns, directly or indirectly, at least 25%, by value, of the shares of another corporation, it will be treated as if it holds directly its proportionate share of the assets and receives directly its proportionate share of the income of such other corporation. If a corporation is treated as a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder for any taxable year, the corporation will continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to that U.S. Holder in all succeeding taxable years, regardless of whether the corporation continues to meet the PFIC requirements in such years, unless certain elections are made.

The determination as to whether a non-U.S. corporation is a PFIC is based on the application of complex U.S. federal income tax rules, which are subject to differing interpretations, and the determination will depend on the composition of the income, expenses and assets of the non-U.S. corporation from time to time and the nature of the activities performed by its officers and employees. Based on the expected composition of Atlatsa’s assets and income, and the way it operates its business, Atlatsa believes that it was not a PFIC for 2015 and has not made a determination of its PFIC status for the 2016 taxable year or any future taxable year. Atlatsa’s actual PFIC status for any taxable year is uncertain and cannot be determined until after the end of such taxable year.

If Atlatsa is classified as a PFIC, a U.S. Holder that does not make any of the elections described below would be required to report any gain on the disposition of any Common Shares as ordinary income, rather than as capital gain, and to compute the tax liability on the gain and any “Excess Distribution” (as defined below) received in respect of the Common Shares as if such items had been earned ratably over each day in the U.S. Holder’s holding period (or a portion thereof) for the Common Shares. The amounts allocated to the taxable year during which the gain is realized or distribution is made, and to any taxable years in such U.S. Holder’s holding period that are before the first taxable year in which Atlatsa is treated as a PFIC with respect to the U.S. Holder, would be included in the U.S. Holder’s gross income as ordinary income for the taxable year of the gain or distribution. The amount allocated to each other taxable year would be taxed as ordinary income at the highest tax rate in effect for the U.S. Holder in that other taxable year and would be subject to an interest charge as if the income tax liabilities had been due with respect to each such prior year. For purposes of these rules, gifts, exchanges pursuant to corporate reorganizations and use of the Common Shares as security for a loan may be treated as a taxable disposition of the Common Shares. An “Excess Distribution” is the amount by which distributions during a taxable year in respect of a Common Share exceed 125% of the average amount of distributions in respect thereof during the three preceding taxable years (or, if shorter, the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the Common Shares).

Certain additional adverse tax rules will apply to a U.S. Holder for any taxable year in which Atlatsa is treated as a PFIC with respect to such U.S. Holder and any subsidiary of Atlatsa is also treated as a PFIC (a “Subsidiary PFIC”). In such a case, the U.S. Holder will generally be deemed to own its proportionate interest (by value) in any Subsidiary PFIC and be subject to the PFIC rules described above with respect to the Subsidiary PFIC regardless of such U.S. Holder’s percentage ownership in Atlatsa.

The adverse tax consequences described above may be mitigated if a U.S. Holder makes a timely “qualified electing fund” election (a “QEF election”) with respect to its interest in the PFIC. Consequently, if Atlatsa were to be classified as a PFIC, it would likely be advantageous for a U.S. Holder to elect to treat Atlatsa as a “qualified electing fund” (a “QEF”) with respect to such U.S. Holder in the first year in which it holds the Common Shares. If a U.S. Holder makes a timely QEF election with respect to Atlatsa, the electing U.S. Holder would be required in each taxable year that Atlatsa is considered a PFIC to include in gross income (i) as ordinary income, the U.S. Holder’s pro rata share of the ordinary earnings of Atlatsa and (ii) as capital gain, the U.S. Holder’s pro rata share of the net capital gain (if any) of Atlatsa, whether or not the ordinary earnings or net capital gain are distributed. An electing U.S. Holder’s basis in the Common Shares will be increased to reflect the amount of any taxed but undistributed income. Distributions of income that had previously been taxed will result in a corresponding reduction of basis in the Common Shares and will not be taxed again as distributions to the U.S. Holder.

 

120


Table of Contents

A QEF election made with respect to Atlatsa will not apply to any Subsidiary PFIC; a QEF election must be made separately for each Subsidiary PFIC (in which case the treatment described above would apply to such Subsidiary PFIC). If a U.S. Holder makes a timely QEF election with respect to a Subsidiary PFIC, it would be required in each taxable year to include in gross income it’s pro rata share of the ordinary earnings and net capital gain of such Subsidiary PFIC, but may not receive a distribution of such income. Such a U.S. Holder may, subject to certain limitations, elect to defer payment of current U.S. federal income tax on such amounts, subject to an interest charge (which would not be deductible if the U.S. Holder were an individual).

For any taxable year in which it determines that it is a PFIC, Atlatsa intends to make available to U.S. Holders, upon request and in accordance with applicable procedures, a “PFIC Annual Information Statement” with respect to Atlatsa and any subsidiary that Atlatsa has determined is likely a PFIC and in which Atlatsa owns, directly or indirectly, greater than 50% of such subsidiary’s total aggregate voting power. The “PFIC Annual Information Statement” may be used by U.S. Holders for purposes of complying with the reporting requirements applicable to a QEF election with respect to Atlatsa and any such Subsidiary PFIC.

Alternatively, if Atlatsa were to be classified as a PFIC, a U.S. Holder could also avoid certain of the rules described above by making a mark-to-market election (instead of a QEF election), provided the Common Shares are treated as regularly traded on a qualified exchange or other market within the meaning of the applicable Treasury regulations. However, a U.S. Holder will not be permitted to make a mark-to-market election with respect to a Subsidiary PFIC. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisers regarding the potential availability and consequences of a mark-to-market election.

During any taxable year in which Atlatsa or any subsidiary of Atlatsa is treated as a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder, that U.S. Holder must file U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Form 8621, Information Return by a Shareholder of a Passive Foreign Investment Company or Qualified Electing Fund. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisers concerning annual filing requirements.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding Requirement

In general, information reporting requirements will apply to payments of dividends, as well as on proceeds from the sale, redemption or other taxable disposition of the Common Shares paid within the United States (and in certain cases, outside the United States) to U.S. Holders other than certain exempt recipients (such as corporations). In addition, backup withholding may apply to such amounts if a U.S. Holder fails to furnish a correct Taxpayer Identification Number on IRS Form W-9 (or substitute IRS Form W-9) or otherwise fails to comply with applicable requirements. Amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules are not an additional tax and may be refunded or credited against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that certain required information is furnished to the IRS in a timely manner.

Certain U.S. Holders are required to report information relating to an interest in the Common Shares, subject to exceptions (including an exception for Common Shares held in accounts maintained by certain financial institutions), by attaching a complete IRS Form 8938, Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets, with its tax return for each year in which it held an interest in the Common Shares. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisers regarding information reporting requirements relating to their ownership of the Common Shares.

10. F. Dividends and Paying Agents

Not applicable.

10. G. Statement by Experts

Not applicable.

10. H. Documents on Display

Exhibits attached to this Annual Report are also available for viewing at the offices of Atlatsa, 4th Floor – 82 Grayston Drive, Off Esterhuysen Lane, Sandton, South Africa 2146, telephone: +27 11 779 6800, facsimile: +27 11 883 0836. Copies of Atlatsa’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements, the MD&A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, which was furnished on EDGAR on Form 6-K on March 30, 2016 and is specifically incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, and other continuous disclosure documents required under the Securities Act (British Columbia) are available for viewing on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov . Additional information, including directors and officers remuneration and indebtedness, principal holders of Atlatsa’s securities and securities authorized for issuance under the Company’s Stock Option Plan, is contained in Atlatsa’s information circular for its most recent annual meeting of security holders that involved the election of directors.

 

121


Table of Contents

10. I. Subsidiary Information

Atlatsa has two subsidiary companies incorporated in the Cayman Islands and one incorporated in South Africa. The articles of these companies do not have unusual provisions which would adversely affect Atlatsa’s ability to exercise control over them as their parent company.

10. J. Registrar and Transfer Agent

Computershare Trust Company of Canada (100 University Avenue, 9 th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2Y1) and Computershare Investor Services (Pty) Limited. (Ground Floor, 70 Marshall Street, Johannesburg, 2001) are the co-transfer agents and co-registrars for the common shares of Atlatsa.

 

122


Table of Contents

 

ITEM 11 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company is exposed to various market risks associated with its underlying assets, liabilities and anticipated transactions. The Company continuously monitors these exposures and enters into derivative financial instruments to reduce these risks. The Company does not enter into derivative transactions on a speculative basis. All fair values have been determined using current market pricing models. See ITEM 18 “Financial Statements – Note 8 of the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal 2015 for an overview of the Company’s derivative financial instruments.

The principal market risks (i.e. the risk of losses arising from adverse movements in market rates and prices) to which the Company is exposed are:

 

    credit risk (if customer or counterparty fails to meet its contractual obligations);

 

    liquidity risk (whether the Company is able to meet its obligations when they fall due – also see note 2 in the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal 2015);

 

    interest rate risk (on loans and borrowings);

 

    commodity price risk (mainly PGM); and

 

    capital risk management.

See ITEM 18 “Financial Statements—Note 9– Financial risk management of the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal 2015 for a qualitative and quantitative discussion of the Company’s exposure to these market risks.

 

123


Table of Contents

 

ITEM 12 DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

Not applicable.

 

124


Table of Contents

PART II

 

 

ITEM 13 DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

13. A. Indebtedness

There has been no material default in the payment or interest on the Company’s outstanding indebtedness since the date of filing of its last Annual Report on Form 20-F.

13. B. Dividends

Not applicable.

 

125


Table of Contents

 

ITEM 14 MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

 

A. There have been no material modifications to the instruments defining the rights of holders of any class of registered securities since the date of filing of the Company’s last Annual Report on Form 20-F.

 

B. Not applicable.

 

C. Not applicable.

 

D. Not applicable.

 

E. Not applicable.

 

126


Table of Contents

 

ITEM 15 CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

15. A. Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision of and with the participation of Management, including the CEO and CFO, Management evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, and required by Rule 13a-15 (b) under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period December 31, 2015 covered by this Annual Report on Form 20-F. Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of December 31, 2015. There have been no significant changes in the internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the internal controls subsequent to the date the Company completed the evaluation.

15. B. Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is defined as a process designed to provide reasonable assurance with respect to the reliability of financial reporting and the presentation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.

Under the supervision and with the participation of the CEO and CFO, Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015. In making their assessment, Management used criteria established in the framework on 1992 Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based upon that assessment, Management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2015 based on the criteria in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by COSO. Management is in process of implementing the control framework as suggested in the COSO framework that was issued on May 14, 2013.

As at December 31, 2015, Management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.

15. C. External Audits’ Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

KPMG Inc., the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the Consolidated Financial Statements and the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015. Their report on the Consolidated Financial Statements appears in this Annual Report on page 134.

15. D. Changes in internal control over financial reporting

As part of the implementation and refinement of the controls necessary to remediate the previous year’s material weakness; changes in internal control over financial reporting occurred during the period covered by this Annual Report, that have had a material effect on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. See “Internal Controls over Financial Reporting Procedures Liquidity” in the MD&A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, which was furnished on EDGAR on Form 6-K on March 30, 2016 and is specifically incorporated by reference herein, for details of the prior year’s material weakness which was remediated.

 

127


Table of Contents

 

ITEM 16

16. A. AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT AND RELATIONSHIP WITH AUDITOR

The CSA have adopted NI 52-110, which requires the Company to disclose annually in its Information Circular certain information concerning the constitution of its Audit and Risk Committee and its relationship with its independent auditor, as set forth hereafter.

The Audit and Risk Committee’s Charter

The Audit and Risk Committee is an important element of the Board’s system of monitoring and control. The text of the Audit and Risk Committee’s charter is available as Section C-1 to the Company’s Corporate Governance Policies and Procedures Manual, which is available on the Company’s website at www.atlatsaresources.co.za . Information contained on or accessible through the Company’s website is not a part of this Annual Report.

Composition of the Audit and Risk Committee

The members of the Audit and Risk Committee in Fiscal 2015 were Fikile De Buck, Colin Clarke, Bongiwe Ntuli and Ralph Havenstein (resigned on June 26, 2015). Ms. Ntuli, Ms. De Buck and Messrs. Havenstein and Clarke are financially literate and have extensive Audit and Risk Committee experience. All members of the Audit and Risk Committee are independent as such term is defined under NI 52-110 and the rules and regulations of the NYSE MKT and are financially literate.

The Executive Chair of the Board, Andile Mabizela (Independent director), the CEO, CFO, the internal auditors (outsourced function) and external auditors attend Audit and Risk Committee meetings on invitation.

The Audit and Risk Committee has been established primarily to assist the Board in overseeing:

 

    the quality and integrity of the company’s financial statements (including group financial statements) and public disclosures in respect thereof;

 

    the qualification and independence of the external auditors for Atlatsa;

 

    the scope and effectiveness of the external audit function for Atlatsa;

 

    the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls;

 

    compliance with legal and regulatory requirements to the extent that it might have an impact on financial statements; and

 

    risk.

In addition to the responsibilities above, the Board has appointed the Audit and Risk Committee to perform on behalf of all South African subsidiaries of Atlatsa, the functions listed in section 94(7) of the South African Companies Act.

The Board has delegated extensive powers in accordance with the South African Companies Act and US corporate governance requirements to the Audit and Risk Committee to perform the above functions. In line with these requirements, the Audit and Risk Committee has, among other things, determined which categories of non-audit services provided by the external auditors should be pre-approved by the Audit and Risk Committee.

The Audit and Risk Committee meets regularly with the Company’s external auditors and managers to consider risk assessment and management, to review the audit plans of the external auditors, and to review accounting, auditing, financial reporting, corporate governance and compliance matters. The Audit and Risk Committee approves the external auditors’ engagement letter on the terms, nature and scope of the audit function and the audit fee. Interim and annual results of the Company and trading statements of the Company are reviewed by the Audit and Risk Committee before publication. The Audit and Risk Committee usually makes recommendations and refers matters for information or approval to the Board.

Both the Audit and Risk Committee and the Board are satisfied that the independence of the external auditors is not in any way impaired or compromised.

 

128


Table of Contents

Relevant Education and Experience

As a result of his or her education and experience, each member of the Audit and Risk Committee has familiarity with, an understanding of, or experience in:

 

    the accounting principles used by the Company to prepare its financial statements, and the ability to assess the general application of those principles in connection with estimates, accruals and reserves;

 

    reviewing or evaluating financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the Company’s financial statements, and

 

    an understanding of internal controls and procedures for financial reporting.

Ms. De Buck is a Fellow of the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (FCCA (UK)).

Ms. Ntuli is a Chartered Accountant (SA). She began her career working for Anglo American plc where she held various finance, treasury and risk management positions at its subsidiaries in South Africa, Canada and the United Kingdom. Ms. Ntuli joined Grindrod Freight Services on her return to South Africa in 2008 as its Chief Financial Officer. Ms. Ntuli also services as a non-executive director of Adapt IT Holdings Limited, a JSE-listed entity, where she has been Chairman of the Audit Committee since 2008.

Mr Clarke holds a Master of Business Administration (MBA) and has served as the COO of the National Empowerment Fund (NEF) in South Africa. The NEF has assets under management of ZAR5.3bn where he headed the group operations as well as Asset Management, Marketing and Communications and Strategy and Planning. Colin has many years of international legal and corporate finance experience with multinational organizations such as BP Amoco, Mr. Clarke has also held the position of Deputy Director for Trade and Investment at the African America Institute (AAI) and Programme Director for the Africa Regional Assistance Electoral Fund (AREAF), established to assist African countries’ transition to democracy, located in Washington DC. In an advisory capacity, Colin was instrumental in the purchase of 15.1% of the equity in Telkom SA from SBC Corporation for US$1 billion on behalf of a South African consortium.

All of the Audit and Risk Committee members are “financially literate”, as that term is defined in NI 52-110.

Reliance on Certain Exemptions

The Company’s auditors, KPMG, have not provided any material non-audit services, except as noted in the table below. Both the Audit and Risk Committee and the Board are satisfied that the independence of its external auditors is not in any way impaired or compromised.

In Fiscal 2015 all recommendations of the Audit and Risk Committee to nominate or compensate an external auditor were adopted by the Board.

16. B. Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to the Company’s CEO, the CFO, other members of senior management and to employees and consultants generally which is included in the corporate governance policies and procedures manual amended by the Board of the Company (the “Code of Ethics”). As adopted, the Company’s Code of Ethics sets forth standards that are designed, among other things, to prevent wrongdoing and to promote:

 

    honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

 

    full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Company files with, or submits to, the SEC and in other public communications made by the Company;

 

    compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;

 

    the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Ethics to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Code of Ethics; and

 

    accountability for adherence to the Code of Ethics.

If any person becomes aware of a breach, or suspected breach, of the Code of Ethics, that person must report it immediately to his or her manager and the Company’s corporate secretary for action. If this is inappropriate or uncomfortable for the individual, the breach, or suspected breach, should be reported to another member of the senior management team and the corporate secretary for action. The Code of Ethics forms part of the conditions of employment for every one of the Company’s employees

 

129


Table of Contents

and officers, and also applies to its directors and contractors. Failure to comply with the Code of Ethics can result in disciplinary action including, where appropriate, dismissal.

16. C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The Company’s auditors, KPMG Inc., are an independent registered public accounting firm.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Company has procedures for the review and pre-approval of any services performed by its auditors. The procedures require that all proposed engagements of its auditors for audit and non-audit services be submitted to the Audit and Risk Committee for approval prior to the beginning of any such services. The Audit and Risk Committee considers such requests and, if acceptable to a majority of the Audit and Risk Committee members, pre-approves such audit and non-audit services by a resolution authorizing management to engage the Company’s auditors for such audit and non-audit services, with set maximum monetary amounts for each itemized service. During such deliberations, the Audit and Risk Committee assesses, among other factors, whether the services requested would be considered “prohibited services” as contemplated by the regulations of the SEC, and whether the services requested and the fees related to such services could impair the independence of the auditors.

External Auditor Service Fees

The Audit and Risk Committee has reviewed the nature and amount of the audit and non-audit services provided by KPMG to the Company to ensure auditor independence. Fees incurred with KPMG for audit and non-audit services in the last two fiscal years are outlined in the following table.

 

Services:

   Year ended
December 31,
2015
     % Pre-approved by
Audit and Risk
Committee
     Year ended
December 31,
2014
     % Pre-approved by
Audit and Risk
Committee
 

Audit Fees (1)

     589,775         100         477,266         100   

Audit-Related Fees (2)

     31,285         100         28,802         100   

Tax fees (3)

     —           100         —           100   

All Other (4)

     —           100         —           100   
     621,060         100         506,068         100   

Note:

 

(1) Audit fees consist of fees billed for the fiscal year 2015, including final billings for fiscal year 2014, audit services engagement and other audit services, which are those services that only the Company’s external auditor reasonably can provide, and include audits, interim reviews, comfort letters and consents, other attest services related to the audit or regulatory filings, and services associated with the filing of documents with regulatory authorities.
(2) Audit-related fees consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements or that are traditionally performed by the external auditor, and include consultations related to financial accounting and reporting matters and standards, and other periodic reports.
(3) Tax fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance (including income and royalty tax payable), tax advice and tax planning.
(4) This specifically relates to KPMG Tax services that were obtained in relation to the Refinancing Plan, assistance with a query in relation to the Company’s share based schemes to the South African Receiver of Revenue, and other minor consulting.

16. D. Exemptions from Listing Standards for Audit and Risk Committees

Not applicable.

16. E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

None.

16. F. Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

Not applicable.

16. G. Corporate Governance

Not applicable.

 

130


Table of Contents

16. H. Mine Safety Disclosure

Not applicable.

 

131


Table of Contents

 

ITEM 17 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

See ITEM  18 .

 

132


Table of Contents

 

ITEM 18 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following attached Financial Statements are incorporated herein:

 

  1. Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (KPMG Inc.) on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as at December 31, 2015 and 2014 and the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, Changes in Equity, Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 and the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting.

 

  2. Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as at December 31, 2015 and 2014.

 

  3. Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

 

  4. Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

 

  5. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

 

  6. Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

 

133


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Atlatsa Resources Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Atlatsa Resources Corporation (the “Company”) as of 31 December 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended 31 December 2015. We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying management’s report on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Atlatsa Resources Corporation as of 31 December 2015 and 2014, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended 31 December 2015, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Also in our opinion, in all material respects, the Company has maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2015, based on criteria

 

134


Table of Contents

established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

Substantial doubt

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans with regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

/s/ KPMG Inc.
KPMG Inc.
Registered Auditor
Johannesburg, South Africa
30 March 2016

 

135


Table of Contents

Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

As at December 31, 2015 and 2014

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

     Note    2015     2014  

Assets

       

Non-current assets

       

Property, plant and equipment

   9      294,924,626        646,245,336   

Capital work-in-progress

   10      9,197,977        29,272,118   

Other intangible assets

   11      226,995        289,390   

Mineral property interests

   12      6,958,857        7,339,706   

Goodwill

   13      —          8,776,080   

Platinum Producers’ Environmental Trust

   14      3,685,645        3,721,035   

Other non-current assets

        —          517   
     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-current assets

        314,994,100        695,644,182   
     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Current assets

       

Inventories

   15      1,553,872        726,343   

Trade and other receivables

   16      6,298,336        16,256,784   

Cash and cash equivalents

   17      3,495,531        8,148,558   

Restricted cash

   18      45,683        48,744   
     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

        11,393,422        25,180,429   
     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

        326,387,522        720,824,611   
     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Equity and Liabilities

       

Equity

       

Share capital

   19      309,691,439        309,659,583   

Treasury shares

   19      (4,991,726     (4,991,726

Foreign currency translation reserve

        (13,587,314     (10,558,030

Share-based payment reserve

        28,058,038        26,245,459   

Accumulated loss

        (256,352,015     (89,283,115
     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total equity attributable to equity holders of the Company

        62,818,422        231,072,171   

Non-controlling interests

        (10,267,725     184,133,904   
     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total equity

        52,550,697        415,206,075   
     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-current liabilities

       

Loans and borrowings

   20      136,837,718        130,402,292   

Finance lease liability

   21      —          283,877   

Deferred tax liability

   22      40,811,920        116,744,891   

Provisions

   23      13,769,756        13,357,268   
     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-current liabilities

        191,419,394        260,788,328   
     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Current liabilities

       

Trade and other payables

   24      36,558,488        41,670,800   

Restructuring provision

   25      9,506,434        —     

Short-term portion of loans and borrowings

   20      36,048,074        524,854   

Short-term portion of finance lease liability

   21      304,435        2,634,554   
     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

        82,417,431        44,830,208   
     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

        273,836,825        305,618,536   
     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total equity and liabilities

        326,387,522        720,824,611   
     

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Approved by the Board of Directors on March 30, 2016

 

/s/ Harold Motaung   /s/ Fikile De Buck
Harold Motaung (Director)   Fikile De Buck (Director)

 

136


Table of Contents

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

     Note    2015     2014     2013  

Revenue

   26      205,690,922        237,390,814        195,621,452   

Cost of sales

   27      (260,574,210     (264,758,202     (233,776,296
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross loss

        (54,883,288     (27,367,388     (38,154,844

General and administrative expenses

        (8,983,474     (10,195,478     (19,805,849

Restructuring costs

        (14,925,719     —          —     

Other expenses including impairment loss

   29      (337,459,411     (2,581,855     (1,688,165

Other income

   30      19,314        35,209        219,434,036   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating (loss)/profit

        (416,232,578     (40,109,512     159,785,178   

Finance income

   31      237,551        296,995        330,591   

Finance costs

   32      (23,882,654     (16,269,673     (56,393,072
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net finance costs

        (23,645,103     (15,972,678     (56,062,481
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss)/profit before income tax

   33      (439,877,681     (56,082,190     103,722,697   

Income tax

   34      70,895,943        6,532,348        (3,853,420
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss)/profit for the year

        (368,981,738     (49,549,842     99,869,277   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income

         

Foreign currency translation differences for foreign operations

        1,333,926        (2,088,318     (27,068,629
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income for the year, net of income tax

   35      1,333,926        (2,088,318     (27,068,629
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income for the year

        (367,647,812     (51,638,160     72,800,648   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss)/profit attributable to:

         

Owners of the parent

        (167,068,900     (24,609,398     199,492,438   

Non-controlling interests

        (201,912,838     (24,940,444     (99,623,161
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss)/profit for the year

        (368,981,738     (49,549,842     99,869,277   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income attributable to:

         

Owners of the parent

        (170,412,542     (25,064,244     198,879,308   

Non-controlling interests

        (197,235,270     (26,573,916     (126,078,660
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income for the year

        (367,647,812     (51,638,160     72,800,648   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic (loss)/earnings per share

   36      (30 cents     (5 cents     47 cents   

Diluted (loss)/earnings per share

   36      (30 cents     (5 cents     46 cents   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

137


Table of Contents

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

          Share capital     Treasury shares     Convertible
preference
shares
    Foreign
currency
translation
reserve
    Share-based
payment
reserve
    Accumulated
Loss
    Total
shareholders’
equity
    Non-
controlling
interests
    Total equity  
    Note     Number of
shares
    Amount     Number of
shares
    Amount                

Balance at January 1, 2013

      201,888,473        71,967,083        4,497,062        (4,991,726     162,910,000        (9,797,657     25,285,851        (264,166,155     (18,792,604     224,049,827        205,257,223   
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Acquisition of shares in Bokoni Platinum Holdings (Pty) Ltd

    28        —          —          —          —          —          —          —          —          —          199,179,381        199,179,381   

Total comprehensive income for the year

                       

Profit/(loss) for the year

      —          —          —          —          —          —          —          199,492,438        199,492,438        (99,623,161     99,869,277   

Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax

    35        —          —          —          —          —          (322,203     (290,927     —          (613,130     (26,455,499     (27,068,629
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income for the year

      —          —          —          —          —          (322,203     (290,927     199,492,438        198,879,308        (126,078,660     72,800,648   
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Transactions with owners, recognised directly in equity

                       

Contributions by and distributions to owners

                       

Fair value gain on de-recognition of debt facility in relation to the first phase of debt restructuring

      —          —          —          —          —          —          —          —          —          (98,923,006     (98,923,006

Share-based payment transactions

      —          —          —          —          —          —          799,726        —          799,726        —          799,726   
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total contributions by and distributions to owners

      —          —          —          —          —          —          799,726        —          799,726        (98,923,006     (98,123,280
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

      201,888,473        71,967,083        4,497,062        (4,991,726     162,910,000        (10,119,860     25,794,650        (64,673,717     180,886,430        198,227,542        379,113,972   
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Common shares issued

    19        125,000,000        74,782,500        —          —          —          —          —          —          74,782,500        —          74,782,500   

Conversion of convertible preference shares

      227,400,000        162,910,000        —          —          (162,910,000     —          —          —          —          —          —     

Acquisition of shares in Bokoni Platinum Holdings (Pty) Ltd

    28        —          —          —          —          —          —          —          —          —          12,480,278        12,480,278   

Total comprehensive income for the year

                       

Profit/(loss) for the year

      —          —          —          —          —          —          —          (24,609,398     (24,609,398     (24,940,444     (49,549,842

Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax

    35        —          —          —          —          —          (438,170     (16,676     —          (454,846     (1,633,472     (2,088,318
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income for the year

      —          —          —          —          —          (438,170     (16,676     (24,609,398     (25,064,244     (26,573,916     (51,638,160
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Transactions with owners, recognised directly in equity

                       

Contributions by and distributions to owners

                       

Share-based payments expense

      —          —          —          —          —          —          467,485        —          467,485        —          467,485   
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total contributions by and distributions to owners

      —          —          —          —          —          —          467,485        —          467,485        —          467,485   
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2014

      554,288,473        309,659,583        4,497,062        (4,991,726     —          (10,558,030     26,245,459        (89,283,115     231,072,171        184,133,904        415,206,075   
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Common shares issued

    19        133,333        31,856        —          —          —          —          (31,856     —          —          —          —     

Acquisition of shares in Bokoni Platinum Holdings (Pty) Ltd

    28        —          —          —          —          —          —          —          —          —          2,833,641        2,833,641   

Total comprehensive income for the year

                       

Profit/(loss) for the year

      —          —          —          —          —          —          —          (167,068,900     (167,068,900     (201,912,838     (368,981,738

Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax

    35        —          —          —          —          —          (3,029,284     (314,358     —          (3,343,642     4,677,568        1,333,926   
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income for the year

      —          —          —          —          —          (3,029,284     (314,358     (167,068,900     (170,412,542     (197,235,270     (367,647,812
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Transactions with owners, recognised directly in equity

                       

Contributions by and distributions to owners

                       

Share-based payments expense

      —          —          —          —          —          —          2,158,793        —          2,158,793        —          2,158,793   
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total contributions by and distributions to owners

      —          —          —          —          —          —          2,158,793        —          2,158,793        —          2,158,793   
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2015

      554,421,806        309,691,439        4,497,062        (4,991,726     —          (13,587,314     28,058,038        (256,352,015     62,818,422        (10,267,725     52,550,697   
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
                       
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

138


Table of Contents

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

     Note      2015     2014     2013  

Cash (utilized by)/generated from operations

     37         (18,012,427     (11,968,791     9,124,254   

Interest received

        116,848        190,369        226,073   

Interest paid

        (3,525,458     (1,595,243     (20,660

Income tax paid

        (548     (353,374     (7,043,536
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash flows (used in)/from operating activities

        (21,421,585     (13,727,039     2,286,131   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities

         

Increase in investments held by Platinum Producers’ Environmental Trust

     14         (301,318     (358,912     (431,999

Acquisition of property, plant and equipment

     9         (6,005     (1,335     (278,200

Expenditures on capital work-in-progress

     10         (25,684,322     (31,740,491     (50,987,358

Proceeds on disposal of property, plant and equipment

        —          4,076        278,200   

Proceeds on disposal of assets held for sale

        —          —          171,600,312   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash flows (used in)/from investing activities

        (25,991,645     (32,096,662     120,180,954   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities

         

Proceeds from loans and borrowings

     20         46,692,236        14,794,838        314,087,529   

Payment of loans and borrowings

     20         —          (75,365,709     (621,959,514

Acquisition of shares in Bokoni Platinum Holdings (Pty) Ltd

        —          —          207,518,927   

Finance lease repaid

     21         (2,922,491     (368,094     —     

Common shares issued

     19         —          74,782,500        —     

Other loans repaid

     20         (498,229     —          293,604   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash flows from/(used in)financing activities

        43,271,516        13,843,535        (100,059,454
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Effect of foreign currency translation

        (511,313     (526,379     3,666,586   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents

        (4,653,027     (32,506,545     26,074,217   

Cash and cash equivalents at January 1, 2015

        8,148,558        40,655,103        14,580,886   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2015

     17         3,495,531        8,148,558        40,655,103   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

139


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

1. CORPORATE AND GROUP INFORMATION

Atlatsa Resources Corporation (“the Company” or “Atlatsa”) is incorporated in the Province of British Columbia, Canada. The Company has a primary listing on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) and has a secondary listing on the JSE Limited (“JSE”). On July 10, 2015, the Company announced its intention to file a Form 25 (Notification of Removal from Listing and/or Registration under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to voluntarily withdraw its common shares from listing on the NYSE MKT. The Company filed the Form 25 on July 20, 2015 and the delisting was effective 10 days following the filing of the Form 25. The Company remains an SEC registrant and will review this position prior to the first anniversary of the delisting off the NTSE MKT. The Company’s common shares continue to be listed on the TSX and the JSE.

The consolidated financial statements comprise of the Company and its subsidiaries (together referred to as “the Group” and individually as “Group entities”). The Groups’ principal business activity is the mining and exploration of Platinum Group Metals (“PGM”) through its mineral property interests. The Company focuses on mineral property interests located in the Republic of South Africa in the Bushveld Complex. Atlatsa operates in South Africa through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited (“Plateau”) which owns the Group’s various mineral property interests and conducts the Group’s business in South Africa.

 

2. GOING CONCERN

The Group incurred a net loss for the year of $369.0 million (which includes an impairment loss of $337.1 million) compared to a 2014 fiscal year loss of $49.5 million. The loss for the year is primarily as a result of the softening in the platinum price during the 2015 financial year and the impact on profitability of the Group’s subsidiary, Bokoni Platinum Mines Proprietary Limited (“Bokoni” or “Bokoni Mine”).

The Group’s current liabilities exceeded its current assets by $71.0 million. This deficit arises mainly as a result of the following:

 

    The $12.5 million (ZAR140 million) backlog of trade and other payables owed to Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited (“RPM”) (RPM is a related party to the Group) by Bokoni. By initial agreement with RPM, the backlog of the trade and other payables was deferred and Bokoni was expected to start repaying $1.4 million (ZAR15.6 million) a month from April 2015 to December 2015. On December 9, 2015, the Senior Facilities Agreement was increased by $6.4 million (ZAR71.4 million) to make available funds to Plateau to repay its 51% pro rata share ($6.4 million (ZAR71.4 million)) of the backlog, subject to conditions precedent being met. Refer to Amended and Restated Senior Facilities Agreement below.

 

    RPM advanced additional funds (not supported by physical metal deliveries) on the purchase of concentrate agreement of $35.9 million (ZAR401,9 million) to secure short term funding until all conditions precedent on the Term Loan facility provided by RPM as discussed below, had been met and this facility could be utilized to fund the Bokoni operations.

 

    The estimated costs associated with the Bokoni Mine Restructure Plan (discussed below) of $9.5 million (ZAR106 million) having been provided for during the period.

The deficit will be financed from short term cash flows and the Term Loan facility provided by RPM as discussed below.

Bokoni Mine operations and restructure plan

The main constraint at Bokoni Mine is the current inability to produce sufficient volumes of high grade underground ore to fill the mill capacity. At current basket prices, the Mine continues to make losses, even at an operating cost level, due to the high cost of production. Even in the event of producing 160 kilo tonnes per month (ktpm) of higher grade ore from underground, Bokoni will remain marginal at these volumes.

Reviews of the operations indicated that the optimum level of production required to ensure that the Bokoni Mine is profitable and sustainable is around 240 ktpm. This review process culminated in the design and development of the current mine plan, which targets a significant increase in mining and concentrating capacity from 160 ktpm to 240 ktpm. In order for Bokoni to achieve the mining and concentrating scale of 240 ktpm targeted in the aforementioned mine plan, Bokoni would require a significant capital investment.

As a result, on September 16, 2015, the Company advised, together with Anglo American Platinum Limited (“Anglo Platinum”), that to ensure the future optimisation of Bokoni Mine, the Company has had to implement an operational and financial restructure plan at Bokoni Mine (“the Restructure Plan”). The primary objective of the Restructure Plan is to enable Bokoni Mine to endure a prolonged period of depressed PGM commodity prices, by reducing its existing cost structure and increasing production volumes of higher grade ore from underground operations.

The Restructure Plan was based on the following assumptions for fiscal 2016:

 

    Platinum price per ounce over life of mine: US$1,392

 

    4E average basket price per ounce: R13,545

 

    ZAR/US$ exchange rate: 11.92

Implementation of the Restructure Plan at Bokoni Mine is anticipated to result in:

 

    the older, high cost UM2 and Vertical Merensky shaft operations being placed on care and maintenance in August and December 2015 respectively, the relevant assets have also been impaired;

 

140


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

    continued ramp up of the Middelpunt Hill UG2 and Brakfontein Merensky development shafts to steady state production of 60,000 tonnes per month (tpm) by the fourth quarter of 2016 and 100,000 tpm by 2019, respectively;

 

    continued mining at the Klipfontein Merensky open-cast operation as a mill gap filler during ramp up of the underground operations;

 

    significant reduction in labour overheads; and

 

    reduction in Bokoni Mine’s unit cost of production.

Bokoni Mine issued a Section 189 (3) notice to relevant parties pursuant to Section 189A of the South African Labour Relations Act, 66 of 1995 (LRA) on September 15, 2015, for the commencement of a consultation process on the contemplated retrenchments of a significant number of its employees based on operational requirements.

The anticipated costs of implementing the Restructure Plan will be financed from short term cash flows and the Term Loan Facility provided by RPM as discussed below.

As at December 31, 2015 the restructure plan was underway and is anticipated to be fully completed by Quarter 2 of 2016. To date, on base cost calculated from August 2015, operational costs have reduced by 15% on average per month, which was achieved by a substantial reduction in Bokoni’s labour force.

Term Loan Facility Agreement

On December 9, 2015, a Term Loan Facility Agreement (“the Facility”), was entered into with RPM providing a $29.9 million (ZAR334.0 million) facility to enable Plateau to advance its share of the shareholder loans to Bokoni Holdco for the sole purpose of enabling Bokoni Mine to fund operating expenses, working capital expenditure and capital expenditure costs in the event that these costs cannot be funded from Bokoni Mine cash flows. RPM will fund its 49% share of cash calls made by Bokoni Mine in accordance with the joint venture shareholders’ agreement between the parties. The Facility bears no interest and replaces the letter of support of November 10, 2014 received from RPM. If however, any amount which is due and payable in accordance with the unpaid, the unpaid amount shall accrue interest at the prime rate plus 2%. The Facility is repayable at the earlier of an event of default and December 31, 2018. There will be a mandatory repayment upon the occurrence of a change of control or a sale of all or substantially all the assets of Bokoni whether in a single transaction or a series of related transactions.

In agreeing to the terms and conditions of the Facility, Atlatsa has agreed to co-operate with Anglo Platinum in relation to RPM’s acquisition of: (i) the prospecting rights held by Kwanda; (ii) the mining rights in respect of Central Block mineral properties held by Plateau (previously contemplated in the letter of support of November 10, 2014); and (iii) the disposal of all or any part of the Holdco Shareholding (collectively, the “Proposed Transaction”).

The conditions to utilisation of the $29.9 million (ZAR334.0 million) Facility include the following:

 

  1. RPM being satisfied that Bokoni Mine is implementing the Restructure Plan in accordance with its terms;

 

  2. RPM being satisfied that Bokoni Mine is optimising its operations to minimise the funding required from shareholders and that Bokoni Mine is identifying and implementing opportunities to optimise revenue, operating costs and capital expenditure (where appropriate);

 

  3. Evidence that all intercompany advances made by RPM to Bokoni Mine (primarily arising from the supply chain between such parties) are paid up to date in accordance with the applicable due date for payment as set out in the terms for payment (as set by RPM) for such transactions (which date shall be no later than the end of the month following the month in which the delivery of goods or services occurred);

 

  4. A consent letter provided by Atlatsa, Plateau, Bokoni Holdco and Bokoni Mine to RPM, consenting to the disclosure by RPM of certain Confidential Information (as defined in the Holdco Shareholders Agreement) in relation to the sale process to facilitate the transfer of the funding arrangements between RPM and Plateau and the disposal of the Holdco Shareholding as contemplated in the Proposed Transaction;

 

  5. Plateau co-operating with the RPM and at RPM’s request, doing all such things, performing all such acts and taking all such steps, and to procure the doing of all such things, within its power and control, as may be necessary for and incidental to the Parties finding a long term sustainable solution to fund Bokoni Mine including in relation to the implementation of the Proposed Transaction;

 

  6. A signed addendum to the management services agreement entered into amongst Plateau, Atlatsa, Anglo Platinum, Bokoni Holdco and Bokoni Mine on or about 19 June 2009, to facilitate a reduction in the monthly management fee payable by Bokoni Mine to Atlatsa from approximately $0.4 million (ZAR5.0 million) to an amount which is no greater than $0.4 million (ZAR4.0 million);

 

  7. The aggregate monthly operating costs of Atlatsa and Plateau have reduced by at least $0.1 million (ZAR1.0 million) per month on a sustainable basis (measured relative to the average operating costs incurred for the 6 months to November 2015);

 

  8. Plateau implementing appropriate initiatives with immediate effect, to reduce: (i) the operating cash losses; and (ii) to the extent possible, the maintenance or ‘stay-in-business’ capital (excluding project capital expenditure), at Bokoni Mine so that Bokoni Mine does not incur an operating loss (known as “Cost 4” at the measurement level);

 

  9. An operational action plan indicating how the tonnage production build-up of Brakfontein and Middelpunt Hill (Bokoni Mine underground shafts) will meet the level set out in the Restructure Plan by 1 January 2016;

 

141


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

  10. A project plan on the retrenchment process applicable to Bokoni Mine and evidence that the Bokoni Mine steering committee and the Bokoni Holdco Board of directors have evaluated and approved such retrenchment process; and

 

  11. Written confirmation from Plateau that it will: (i) consult with RPM during the process of recruiting a new General Manager and new Finance Manager of Bokoni Mine, each in a permanent capacity; (ii) obtain RPM’s prior written approval in respect of the persons to be appointed to such positions.

On March 8, 2016 the conditions precedent to utilisation of the Facility were met, allowing for draw downs to finance operational cash short falls and the repayment of the purchase of concentrate funding previously discussed.

Amended and Restated Senior Facilities Agreement

The Senior Facilities Agreement was amended and restated to increase the availability under the facility by $6.4 million (ZAR71.4 million) on December 9, 2015 to enable the backlog of the trade and other payables relating to RPM of approximately $12.5 million (ZAR140.0 million) (discussed above) to be repaid in order to manage the Group’s liquidity. As at the date of the issue of these consolidated financial statements a condition precedent remains outstanding and it is anticipated will be met by Quarter 2 of 2016. On mutual agreement with RPM the repayment would take place once the condition precedent has been met, which is anticipated shortly.

Going concern conclusion

Atlatsa remains in discussions with Anglo Platinum surrounding the future optimisation of Bokoni Mine, as contemplated in the Proposed Transaction above, as well as potential alternative financial support for the Company having regard to current challenges within the South African platinum industry. Management is continuously investigating areas to preserve cash in the short term including the possibility of a further reduction in capital projects where appropriate.

The consolidated financial statements are prepared on the basis of accounting policies applicable to a going concern. This basis presumes that the Restructure Plan will be successfully implemented, including the production profile as per the Restructure Plan being met and consensus PGM metal price forecasts strengthening to the projected forecasts for 2016, to have sufficient cash resources available to settle the Group’s liabilities in the ordinary course of business.

These conditions give rise to a material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt on the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to continue as going concerns and therefore may be unable to realise their assets and discharge their liabilities in the normal course of business.

 

3. BASIS OF PREPARATION

 

3.1 Overview

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”).

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis as set out in the accounting policies below. Certain items, including derivative financial instruments, are stated at fair value. The consolidated financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars (“$”), and all values are rounded to the nearest dollar, except where otherwise stated.

 

3.2 Basis of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of the Group as at December 31, 2015. Control is achieved when the Group is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee. Specifically, the Group controls an investee if, and only if, the Group has the following:

 

    Power over the investee (i.e., existing rights that give it the current ability to direct the relevant activities of the investee);

 

    Exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee; and

 

    The ability to use its power over the investee to affect its returns

When the Group has less than a majority of the voting, or similar, rights of an investee, it considers all relevant facts and circumstances in assessing whether it has power over an investee, including:

 

    The contractual arrangement(s) with the other vote holders of the investee;

 

    Rights arising from other contractual arrangements; and

 

    The Group’s voting rights and potential voting rights

The Group reassesses whether or not it controls an investee if facts and circumstances indicate that there are changes to one or more of the three elements of control. Consolidation of a subsidiary begins when the Group obtains control over the subsidiary and ceases when the Group loses control of the subsidiary. Assets, liabilities, income and expenses of a subsidiary acquired or disposed of during the year are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date the Group gains control until the date the Group ceases to control the subsidiary.

 

142


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Profit or loss and each component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) are attributed to the equity holders of the parent of the Group and to the non-controlling interests, even if this results in the non-controlling interests having a deficit balance. When necessary, adjustments are made to the financial statements of subsidiaries to bring their accounting policies in line with the Group’s accounting policies. All intragroup assets and liabilities, equity, income, expenses and cash flows relating to transactions between members of the Group are eliminated in full on consolidation.

A change in the ownership interest of a subsidiary, without a loss of control, is accounted for as an equity transaction.

 

3.3 Foreign currencies

The consolidated financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars, which is also the parent entity’s functional currency. The Group does have foreign operations.

 

4 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING JUDGEMENTS, ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS

The preparation of the Group’s consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities and the accompanying disclosures, and the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements.

Estimates and underlying assumptions are continually reviewed and are based on management’s experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Uncertainty about these assumptions and estimates could result in outcomes that require a material adjustment to the carrying amount of assets or liabilities affected in future periods.

In particular, the Group has identified a number of areas where significant judgements, estimates and assumptions are required. Further information on each of these areas and how they impact various accounting policies are either described within the associated accounting policy note (Note 6) or are described below.

These include:

Judgements:

 

    Exploration and evaluation expenditure (i)

 

    Recovery of deferred tax assets (ii)

 

    Functional currency (Note 6.2)

Estimates and assumptions:

 

    Ore reserve and mineral resource estimates (iii)

 

    Exploration and evaluation expenditure (i)

 

    Unit-of-production (“UOP”) depreciation (iv)

 

    Mine rehabilitation (v)

 

    Recoverability/impairment of assets (vi)

 

    Inventories (vii)

 

    Fair value measurements (viii)

 

    Contingencies (ix)

The key assumptions concerning the future and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the reporting date that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year, are described below or in the related accounting policy note (see list above for references). The Group based its assumptions and estimates on parameters available when the consolidated financial statements were prepared. Existing circumstances and assumptions about future developments, however, may change due to market change or circumstances arising beyond the control of the Group. Such changes are reflected in the assumptions when they occur.

 

(i) Exploration and evaluation expenditure

The application of the Group’s accounting policy for exploration and evaluation expenditure requires judgement to determine whether future economic benefits are likely, from either future exploration or sale, or whether activities have not reached a stage that permits a reasonable assessment of the existence of reserves.

In addition to applying judgement to determine whether future economic benefits are likely to arise from the Group’s exploration and evaluation assets or whether activities have not reached a stage that permits a reasonable assessment of the existence of reserves, the Group has to apply a number of estimates and assumptions.

The determination of a SAMREC (South African Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves) resource is itself an estimation process that involves varying degrees of uncertainty depending on how the resources are classified (i.e., measured, indicated or inferred). The estimates directly impact when the Group defers exploration and evaluation expenditure. The deferral policy requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions about future events and circumstances, particularly, whether an economically viable extraction operation can be established. Any such estimates and assumptions may change as new information becomes available. If, after

 

143


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

expenditure is capitalised, information becomes available suggesting that the recovery of expenditure is unlikely, the relevant capitalised amount is recognised in profit or loss when the new information becomes available.

 

(ii) Recovery of deferred tax assets

Deferred tax assets are recognised for unutilised tax losses, unused tax credits and deductible temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the losses can be utilised. Significant management judgement is required to determine the amount of deferred tax assets that can be recognised, based upon the likely timing and the level of future taxable profits together with future tax planning strategies.

Judgement is required to determine which arrangements are considered to be a tax on income as opposed to an operating cost. Judgement is also required to determine whether deferred tax assets are recognised in the statement of financial position. Deferred tax assets, including those arising from unutilised tax losses, require management to assess the likelihood that the Group will generate sufficient taxable earnings in future periods, in order to utilise recognised deferred tax assets. Assumptions about the generation of future taxable profits depend on management’s estimates of future cash flows. These estimates of future taxable income are based on forecast cash flows from operations (which are impacted by production and sales volumes, commodity prices, reserves, operating costs, closure and rehabilitation costs, capital expenditure, dividends and other capital management transactions) and judgement about the application of existing tax laws in each jurisdiction. To the extent that future cash flows and taxable income differ significantly from estimates, the ability of the Group to realise the net deferred tax assets recorded at the reporting date could be impacted.

In addition, future changes in tax laws in the jurisdictions in which the Group operates could limit the ability of the group to obtain tax deductions in future periods.

 

(iii) Ore reserve and mineral resource estimates

Ore reserves and mineral resource estimates are estimates of the amount of ore that can be economically and legally extracted from the Group’s mining properties. Such reserves and mineral resource estimates and changes to these may impact the Group’s reported financial position and results, in the following way:

 

    The carrying value of exploration and evaluation assets; mine properties; property, plant and equipment; and goodwill may be affected due to changes in estimated future cash flows

 

    Depreciation and amortisation charges in profit or loss may change where such charges are determined using the unit-of-production method, or where the useful life of the related assets change

 

    Capitalised stripping costs recognised in the statement of financial position as either part of mine properties or inventory or charged to profit or loss may change due to changes in stripping ratios

 

    Provisions for rehabilitation and environmental provisions may change where reserve estimate changes affect expectations about when such activities will occur and the associated cost of these activities

 

    The recognition and carrying value of deferred income tax assets may change due to changes in the judgements regarding the existence of such assets and in estimates of the likely recovery of such assets

The Group estimates its ore reserves and mineral resources based on information compiled by appropriately qualified persons relating to the geological and technical data on the size, depth, shape and grade of the ore body and suitable production techniques and recovery rates. Such an analysis requires complex geological judgements to interpret the data. The estimation of recoverable reserves is based upon factors such as estimates of foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, future capital requirements and production costs, along with geological assumptions and judgements made in estimating the size and grade of the ore body.

The Group estimates and reports ore reserves and mineral resources in line with the principles contained in the South African Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves of 2007, revised in 2009 (SAMREC 2009), known as the “SAMREC Code”.

As the economic assumptions used may change and as additional geological information is produced during the operation of a mine, estimates of reserves and mineral resources may change.

 

(iv) Unit-of-production depreciation

Estimated economically recoverable reserves are used in determining the depreciation and/or amortisation of mine-specific assets. This results in a depreciation/amortisation charge proportional to the depletion of the anticipated remaining life-of-mine production. Units of production (“UOP”) used to calculate depreciation includes proven and probable reserves only. These reserves are updated on a yearly basis as the life-of-mine plan is revised. The life of each item has regard to both its physical life limitations and present assessments of economically recoverable reserves of the mine property at which the asset is located. These calculations require the use of estimates and assumptions, including the amount of recoverable reserves and estimates of future capital expenditure.

The calculation of the UOP rate of depreciation/amortisation could be impacted to the extent that actual production in the future is different from current forecast production based on economically recoverable reserves, or if future capital expenditure estimates change.

Changes to economically recoverable reserves could arise due to changes in the factors or assumptions used in estimating reserves, including:

 

   

The effect on economically recoverable reserves of differences between actual commodity prices and commodity price assumptions;

 

144


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

 

and

 

    Unforeseen operational issues.

Changes in estimates are accounted for prospectively.

 

(v) Mine rehabilitation

The ultimate rehabilitation costs are uncertain, and cost estimates can vary in response to many factors, including estimates of the extent and costs of rehabilitation activities, technological changes, regulatory changes, cost increases as compared to the inflation rates (5.50% (2014: 5.40%)), and changes in discount rates (9.63% (2014: 7.96%)). These uncertainties may result in future actual expenditure differing from the amounts currently provided. Therefore, significant estimates and assumptions are made in determining the provision for mine rehabilitation. As a result, there could be significant adjustments to the provisions established which would affect future financial result.

The provision at reporting date represents management’s best estimate of the present value of the future rehabilitation costs required.

 

(vi) Recoverability/impairment of assets

The Group assesses each cash-generating unit (“CGU”) annually to determine whether any indication of impairment exists. Where an indicator of impairment exists, a formal estimate of the recoverable amount is made, which is considered to be the higher of the fair-value-less-costs-of-disposal and value in use. Goodwill is assessed for impairment annually, regardless of indicators. These assessments require the use of estimates and assumptions such as long-term commodity prices, discount rates, future capital requirements, exploration potential and operating performance. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or payment made to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value for mineral assets is generally determined as the present value of estimated future cash flows arising from the continued use of the asset, which includes estimates such as the cost of future expansion plans and eventual disposal, using assumptions that an independent market participant may take into account.

Impairment testing requires management to make significant judgements concerning the existence of impairment indicators, identification of CGUs, remaining useful lives of assets and estimates of projected cash flows and fair-value-less-costs-of-disposal. Management’s analysis of CGUs involves an assessment of a group of assets’ ability to independently generate cash inflows and involves analysing the extent to which different products make use of the same assets. Management’s judgement is also required when assessing whether a previously recognised impairment loss should be reversed. Cash flows are discounted by an appropriate discount rate to determine the net present value.

Management has assessed its CGU as being the Bokoni Mine, which is the lowest level for which cash flows are largely independent of other assets.

The determined value in use of the CGU is most sensitive to the platinum price, the US dollar exchange rate and the discount rate.

In assessing the value in use, key estimates and judgements were made by management, which are based on management’s interpretation of market forecasts and future inflation rates. These include long term platinum prices and USD exchange rates. Both these variables were determined based on market consensus forecast prices for the first five years after which the price for platinum was inflated using 2.22% (2014: 2.85%). The real weighted average cost of capital used to discount the future free cash flows was determined as 12.55% (2014: 10.97%).

 

(vii) Inventories

Net realisable value tests are performed at each reporting date and represent the estimated future sales price of the product the entity expects to realise when the product is processed and sold, less estimated costs to complete production and bring the product to sale. Where the time value of money is material, these future prices and costs to complete are discounted.

Stockpiles are measured by estimating the number of tonnes added and removed from the stockpile, the number of contained Platinum Group Metal (“PGM”) ounces, based on assay data, and the estimated recovery percentage, based on the expected processing method. Stockpile tonnages are verified by periodic surveys.

 

(viii) Fair value measurements

The Group measures financial instruments at fair value on initial recognition. Also, from time to time, the fair values of non-financial assets and liabilities are required to be determined, e.g. when the entity acquires a business, or where an entity measures the recoverable amount of an asset or CGU at fair-value-less-costs-of-disposal.

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value of an asset or a liability is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, assuming that market participants act in their economic best interest.

A fair value measurement of a non-financial asset takes into account a market participant’s ability to generate economic benefits by using the asset in its highest and best use or by selling it to another market participant that would use the asset in its highest and best use.

The Group uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data is available to measure fair value, maximising the use of relevant observable inputs and minimising the use of unobservable inputs. Changes in estimates and assumptions about these inputs could affect the reported fair value.

 

145


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Share-based payments

The fair value of options granted is being determined using Black-Scholes and Monte-Carlo Simulation valuation models. Refer to Note 39 for significant inputs into the models for the various share option schemes.

New Senior Facilities Agreement

Management has applied judgement when determining the fair value on initial recognition for the New Senior Facilities Agreement. The fair value of the New Senior Facilities Agreement is determined using a cash flow valuation model. The significant inputs into the model are the opening balances as contractually agreed with the counterparty, set interest rates applicable to the Company, projected drawdowns and repayments on the loan and projected forward Johannesburg Interbank Agreed Rate (“JIBAR”) rates plus a market related spread. Based on the aforementioned, an effective interest rate was established on initial recognition that would be used to build the loan back up to contractual value by date of payment.

The following assumptions in the model may change:

 

    Any additional drawdowns have to be fairly valued at initial recognition;

 

    Update of the quarter end JIBAR curve, which may have an impact on the projected JIBAR rates; and

 

    An adjustment to the estimates of cash flows.

 

(ix) Contingencies

By their nature, contingencies will be resolved only when one or more uncertain future events occur or fail to occur. The assessment of the existence and potential quantum of contingencies inherently involves the exercise of significant judgement and the use of estimates regarding the outcome of future events.

 

5 CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND DISCLOSURES

Except for the changes below, the Group has consistently applied the accounting policies set out in Note 6 to all periods presented in these consolidated financial statements.

 

5.1 Change in accounting policies

The Group adopted the following new standards and amendments to standards, including any consequential amendments to other standards, with a date of initial application of January 1, 2015:

 

    Defined Benefit Plans: Employee Contributions (Amendments to IAS 19)

 

    Improvements to IFRSs – 2010-2012 Cycle: Amendments to IFRS 13 – Short-term receivables and payables

The amendment clarifies in the Basis for Conclusions that short-term receivables and payables with no stated interest rates can be measured at invoice amounts when the effect of discounting is immaterial. The adoption of this amendment had no impact on the Group as the principle was already applied.

 

    Improvements to IFRSs – 2011-2013 Cycle: Amendments to IFRS 1 – Meaning of “effective IFRSs”

The amendment clarifies in the Basis for Conclusions that an entity may choose to apply either a current standard or a new standard that is not yet mandatory, but permits early application, provided either standard is applied consistently throughout the periods presented in the entity’s first IFRS financial statements. The adoption of this amendment had no impact on the Group as the Group already adopted IFRS in 2006.

Summary of quantitative impacts

There was no quantitative impact on the Group’s financial position, comprehensive income and cash flows due to the above changes in the accounting policies.

 

5.2 Standards issued but not yet effective

The standards and interpretations that are issued, but not yet effective, up to the date of issuance of the Group’s consolidated financial statements are disclosed below:

Effective January 1, 2016:

 

    Accounting for Acquisitions of interests in Joint Operations (Amendments to IFRS 11)

 

    Clarification of Acceptable Methods of Depreciation and Amortisation (Amendments to IAS 16 and IAS 38)

 

146


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

    Equity Method in Separate Financial Statements (Amendments to IAS 27)

 

    Sale or Contribution of Assets between an Investor and its Associate or Joint Venture (amendments to IFRS 10 and IAS 28)

 

    Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2012-2014 Cycle – various standards

 

    IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations – Changes in methods of disposal

 

    IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures – Servicing contracts

 

    IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures – Applicability of the offsetting disclosures to condensed interim financial statements

 

    IAS 19 Employee Benefits – Discount rate: regional market issues

 

    IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting – Disclosure of information ‘elsewhere in the interim financial report’

 

    Investment Entities: Applying the Consolidation Exemption (Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 28)

 

    Disclosure initiative (Amendments to IAS 1)

Effective January 1, 2018:

 

    IFRS 9 Financial Instruments

 

    IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers

Effective January 1, 2019:

 

    IFRS 16 Leases

All Standards and Interpretations will be adopted at their effective date, if applicable.

Management is currently in the process of assessing the impact of the above-mentioned changes, if any.

 

6 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

6.1 Business combinations

Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method when control is transferred to the Group. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the aggregate of the consideration transferred, measured at acquisition date fair value and the amount of any non-controlling interest (“NCI”) in the acquiree. For each business combination, the Group elects whether to measure the NCI in the acquiree at fair value or at the proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred and included in administrative expenses.

When the Group acquires a business, it assesses the assets and liabilities assumed for appropriate classification and designation in accordance with the contractual terms, economic circumstances and pertinent conditions as at the acquisition date. As part of a business combination, the Group assesses whether there are any operating lease contracts of the acquiree that may be onerous - that is, where the lease premiums being paid on that contract exceed the current market rate for such lease arrangements. Mineral reserves, resources and exploration potential that can be reliably measured are recognised separately in the assessment of fair values on acquisition. Other potential reserves, resources and rights, for which fair values cannot be reliably measured, are not recognised separately, but instead are subsumed in goodwill.

If the business combination is achieved in stages, any previously held equity interest is re-measured at its acquisition-date fair value, and any resulting gain or loss is recognised in profit or loss. It is then considered in the determination of goodwill.

Any contingent consideration to be transferred by the acquirer will be recognised at fair value at the acquisition date. Contingent consideration classified as an asset or liability that is a financial instrument and within the scope of IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement is measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognised either in profit or loss or as a change to other comprehensive income. If the contingent consideration is not within the scope of IAS 39, it is measured in accordance with the appropriate IFRS. Contingent consideration that is classified as equity is not re-measured and subsequent settlement is accounted for within equity.

Goodwill is initially measured at cost, being the excess of the aggregate of the consideration transferred and the amount recognised for NCI over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired and liabilities assumed. If the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired is in excess of the aggregate consideration transferred, the Group reassesses whether it has correctly identified all of the assets acquired and all of the liabilities assumed and reviews the procedures used to measure the amounts to be recognised at the acquisition date. If the reassessment

 

147


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

still results in an excess of the fair value of net assets acquired over the aggregate consideration transferred, then the gain is recognised in the profit or loss. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment.

After initial recognition, goodwill is measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill acquired in a business combination is, from the acquisition date, allocated to each of the Group’s CGUs that are expected to benefit from the combination, irrespective of whether other assets or liabilities of the acquiree are assigned to those units.

Where goodwill forms part of a CGU and part of the operation and that unit is disposed of, the goodwill associated with the disposed operation is included in the carrying amount of the operation when determining the gain or loss on disposal. Goodwill disposed of in these circumstances is measured based on the relative value of the disposed operation and the portion of the CGU retained.

 

(i) Acquisitions of non-controlling interests

Non-controlling interests are measured at their proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets at the acquisition date.

Acquisitions of non-controlling interests that do not result in loss of control are accounted for as transactions with equity holders in their capacity as equity holders and therefore no goodwill is recognised as a result of such transactions.

 

(ii) Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries are entities over which the Group exercises control. The Group controls an entity when it is exposed to or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity. The accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to align them with the policies adopted by the Group.

 

(iii) Transactions eliminated on consolidation

Intra-group balances and transactions, and any unrealised income and expenses arising from intra-group transactions, are eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements.

 

6.2 Foreign currencies

 

(i) Foreign currency transactions

Transactions in foreign currencies are translated to the respective functional currencies of Group entities at exchange rates at the date of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the reporting date are translated to the functional currency at the exchange rate at that date. The foreign currency gain or loss on monetary items is the difference between amortised cost in the functional currency at the beginning of the year, adjusted for effective interest and payments during the year, and the amortised cost in foreign currency translated at the exchange rate at the end of the year. Such gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss.

Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies that are measured at fair value are translated to the functional currency at the exchange rate at the date that the fair value was determined. Non-monetary items in a foreign currency that are measured in terms of historical cost are translated using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Foreign currency differences arising on translation are recognised in profit or loss.

 

(ii) Foreign operations

The financial results of Group entities that have a functional currency different from the presentation currency are translated into the presentation currency. The presentation currency of the Company is Canadian Dollars. Income and expenditure transactions of foreign operations are translated at the average rate of exchange for the year except for significant individual transactions which are translated at the rate of exchange in effect at the transaction date. All assets and liabilities, including fair value adjustments and goodwill arising on acquisition, are translated at the rate of exchange ruling at the reporting date.

Foreign currency differences are recognised in other comprehensive income, and presented in the foreign currency translation reserve (“FCTR”) in equity. However, if the foreign operation is a non-wholly owned subsidiary, then the relevant proportion of the translation difference is allocated to non-controlling interests.

When the settlement of a monetary item receivable from or payable to a foreign operation is neither planned nor likely in the foreseeable future, foreign exchange gains and losses arising from such a monetary item are considered to form part of the net investment in a foreign operation and are recognised in other comprehensive income and are included in the foreign currency translation reserve.

On disposal of part or all of the operations, such that control, significant influence or joint control is lost, the proportionate share of the related cumulative gains and losses previously recognised in the FCTR through the other income are included in determining the profit or loss on disposal of that operation recognised in profit or loss.

 

148


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

6.3 Financial instruments – initial recognition and subsequent measurement

A financial instrument is any contract that gives rise to a financial asset of one entity and a financial liability or equity instrument of another entity.

 

(i) Financial assets

Initial recognition and measurement

Financial assets are classified, at initial recognition, as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments or available-for-sale (“AFS”) financial assets, as appropriate.

All financial assets are recognised initially at fair value plus, in the case of financial assets not recorded at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs that are attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset.

Purchases or sales of financial assets that require delivery of assets in a timeframe established by regulation or convention in the marketplace (regular way trades) are recognised on the trade date, i.e. the date that the Group commits to purchase or sell the asset.

Subsequent measurement

The subsequent measurements of financial assets are classified into four categories:

 

    Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss – the Group has no financial assets at fair value through profit or loss.

 

    Loans and receivables.

 

    Held-to-maturity investments — the Group has no held-to-maturity investments.

 

    AFS financial investments — the Group has no AFS financial assets.

Loans and receivables

Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Subsequent to initial measurement loans and receivables are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment losses. Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees or costs that are an integral part of the effective interest rate. The effective interest rate amortisation is included in net finance costs in the profit or loss. The losses arising from impairment are recognised in profit or loss for loans and receivables.

Loans and receivables comprise trade and other receivables, restricted cash, investment in the Platinum Producer’s Environmental Trust and cash and cash equivalents.

Derecognition

A financial asset (or, when applicable, a part of a financial asset or part of a group of similar financial assets) is derecognised when either:

 

    The rights to receive cash flows from the asset have expired; or

 

    The Group has transferred its rights to receive cash flows from the asset or has assumed an obligation to pay the received cash flows in full without material delay to a third party under a ‘pass-through’ arrangement and either: (a) the Group has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset; or (b) the Group has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset but has transferred control of the asset.

When the Group has transferred its rights to receive cash flows from an asset or has entered into a pass-through arrangement, it evaluates if, and to what extent, it has retained the risks and rewards of ownership. When it has neither transferred nor retained substantially all of the risks and rewards of the asset, nor transferred control of the asset, the Group continues to recognise the transferred asset to the extent of the Group’s continuing involvement. In that case, the Group also recognises an associated liability. The transferred asset and the associated liability are measured on a basis that reflects the rights and obligations that the Group has retained.

 

(ii) Financial liabilities

Initial recognition and measurement

Financial liabilities are classified, at initial recognition, either as financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss or financial liabilities at amortised cost, as appropriate. All financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value and, in the case of financial liabilities at amortised cost, net of directly attributable transaction costs.

The Group’s financial liabilities include trade and other payables and loans and borrowings including bank overdrafts.

Subsequent measurement

 

149


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

The measurement of financial liabilities depends on their classification as described below.

Financial liabilities at amortised cost

After initial recognition, interest-bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss when the liabilities are derecognised.

Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees or costs that are an integral part of the effective interest rate. The effective interest rate amortisation is included as finance costs in profit or loss. This category generally applies to loans and borrowings and trade and other payables.

For loans and borrowings with a shareholder, refer to Note 6.17, Transactions with a shareholder.

Derecognition

A financial liability is derecognised when the associated obligation is discharged or cancelled or expires.

When an existing financial liability is replaced by another from the same lender on substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modified, such an exchange or modification is treated as the derecognition of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability. The difference in the respective carrying amounts is recognised in profit or loss, unless the transaction takes place with a shareholder acting in its capacity as shareholder, in which case the gain or loss is recognised directly in equity.

 

(iii) Share capital

Common shares

Common shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of common shares and share options are recognised as a deduction from equity, net of any tax effects.

Preference share capital

Preference share capital is classified as equity if it is non-redeemable, redeemable for a fixed number of the Company’s shares, or redeemable only at the Company’s option, and any dividends are discretionary. Dividends thereon are recognised as distributions within equity upon approval by the Company’s Board of Directors. Preference share capital is classified as a financial liability if it is redeemable on a specific date or at the option of the holders, or if dividend payments are not discretionary. Dividends thereon are recognised as finance expense in profit or loss as accrued.

Treasury shares

Shares issued to subsidiaries are reflected as treasury shares on consolidation.

When the shares recognised as equity are repurchased, the amount of the consideration paid, which includes directly attributable costs, net of any tax effects, is recognised as a deduction from equity. Repurchased shares are classified as treasury shares and are presented in the treasury share reserve. When treasury shares are sold or reissued subsequently, the amount received is recognised as an increase in equity and the resulting surplus or deficit on the transaction is presented within share premium.

 

(iv) Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents in the statement of financial position comprise cash at banks and on hand and short-term deposits with an original maturity of three months or less, but exclude any restricted cash. Restricted cash is not available for use by the Group and therefore is not considered highly liquid — for example, cash set aside to cover rehabilitation obligations.

For the purpose of the consolidated statement of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and short-term deposits as defined above, net of outstanding bank overdrafts.

 

6.4 Borrowing costs

Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of an asset that necessarily takes a substantial period of time to get ready for its intended use or sale (a qualifying asset) are capitalised as part of the cost of the respective asset. Borrowing costs consist of interest and other costs that an entity incurs in connection with the borrowing of funds.

Where funds are borrowed specifically to finance a project, the amount capitalised represents the actual borrowing costs incurred. Where surplus funds are available for a short term from funds borrowed specifically to finance a project, the income generated from the temporary investment of such amounts is also capitalised and deducted from the total capitalised borrowing cost. Where the funds used to finance a project form part of general borrowings, the amount capitalised is calculated using a weighted average of rates applicable to relevant general borrowings of the Group during the period.

 

150


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

All other borrowing costs are recognised in profit or loss in the period in which they are incurred.

Even though exploration and evaluation assets can be qualifying assets, they generally do not meet the ‘probable economic benefits’ test and also are rarely debt funded. Any related borrowing costs incurred during this phase are therefore generally recognised in profit or loss in the period they are incurred.

 

6.5 Mineral exploration, evaluation and development expenditure

 

(i) Pre-licence costs

Pre-licence costs relate to costs incurred before the Group has obtained legal rights to explore in a specific area. Such costs may include the acquisition of exploration data and the associated costs of analysing that data. These costs are expensed in the period in which they are incurred.

 

(ii) Exploration and evaluation expenditure

Exploration and evaluation activity involves the search for mineral resources, the determination of technical feasibility and the assessment of commercial viability of an identified resource. The feasibility of a mining operation is determined by a feasibility study, which includes the following criteria:

 

    Economic benefits,

 

    Water and power availability,

 

    Environmental management,

 

    Surface rights, and

 

    All other regulatory permitting and the successful application for a mining licence.

Exploration and evaluation costs are capitalised once the outcome of the mining operation’s feasibility study is considered favourable.

Exploration and evaluation activity includes:

 

    Researching and analysing historical exploration data;

 

    Gathering exploration data through geophysical studies;

 

    Exploratory drilling and sampling;

 

    Determining and examining the volume and grade of the resource;

 

    Surveying transportation and infrastructure requirements; and

 

    Conducting market and finance studies.

Licence costs paid in connection with a right to explore in an existing exploration area are capitalised and amortised over the term of the permit.

Once the legal right to explore has been acquired, exploration and evaluation expenditure is charged to profit or loss as incurred, unless the Group concludes that a future economic benefit is more likely than not to be realised. These costs include directly attributable employee remuneration, materials and fuel used, surveying costs, drilling costs and payments made to contractors.

In evaluating whether the expenditures meet the criteria to be capitalised, several different sources of information are used. The information that is used to determine the probability of future benefits depends on the extent of exploration and evaluation that has been performed.

Exploration and evaluation expenditure incurred on licences where a SAMREC-compliant resource has not yet been established is expensed as incurred until sufficient evaluation has occurred in order to establish a compliant resource. Costs expensed during this phase are included in ‘Other operating expenses’ in profit or loss.

Upon the establishment of a SAMREC-compliant resource (at which point, the Group considers it probable that economic benefits will be realised), the Group capitalises any further evaluation expenditure incurred for the particular licence as exploration and evaluation assets up to the point when a SAMREC-compliant reserve is established. Capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure is considered to be a tangible asset.

Exploration and evaluation assets acquired in a business combination are initially recognised at fair value, including resources and exploration potential that is value beyond proven and probable reserves. Similarly, the costs associated with acquiring an exploration and evaluation asset (that does not represent a business) are also capitalised. They are subsequently measured at cost less accumulated impairment. Once SAMREC-compliant reserves are established and development is sanctioned, exploration and evaluation assets are tested for impairment and transferred to ‘Mines under construction’ which is a sub-category of Mine properties. No amortisation is charged during the exploration and evaluation phase.

 

6.6 Property, plant and equipment

 

(i) Initial recognition

Mine development and infrastructure costs are capitalised to capital work-in-progress and transferred to property, plant and equipment when the mining venture reaches commercial production. Items of property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses.

 

151


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

The initial cost of an asset comprises its purchase price or construction cost, any costs directly attributable to bringing the asset into operation, the initial estimate of the rehabilitation obligation, and, for qualifying assets (where relevant), borrowing costs. The purchase price or construction cost is the aggregate amount paid and the fair value of any other consideration given to acquire the asset. The capitalised value of a finance lease is also included in property, plant and equipment.

 

(ii) Depreciation

Items of property, plant and equipment, excluding capitalised mine development and infrastructure costs, are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their expected useful life. Capitalised mine development and infrastructure are depreciated on a units of production basis. Depreciation is charged on mining assets from the date on which they are available for use.

Units of production used to calculate depreciation includes proved and probable reserves only. These reserves are updated on a yearly basis as the Life of Mine plan is reviewed.

When parts of an item of property, plant and equipment have different useful lives, they are accounted for as separate items (major components) of property, plant and equipment.

Property, plant and equipment are depreciated over their estimated useful lives as follows:

 

Land    Not depreciated
Mine development and infrastructure    Units of production over proved and probable reserves
Plant and equipment    1 – 30 years
Buildings    5 – 30 years
Motor vehicles    1 – 5 years
Furniture and fittings    1 – 10 years

 

(iii) Major maintenance and repairs

Expenditure on major maintenance refits or repairs comprises the cost of replacement assets or parts of assets and overhaul costs. Where an asset, or part of an asset, that was separately depreciated and is now written off is replaced, and it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group through an extended life, the expenditure is capitalised.

Where part of the asset was not separately considered as a component and therefore not depreciated separately, the replacement value is used to estimate the carrying amount of the replaced asset(s) which is immediately written off. All other day-to-day maintenance and repairs costs are expensed as incurred.

 

(iv) Subsequent expenditure

Subsequent expenditure relating to an item of property, plant and equipment is capitalised when it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the Group. All other subsequent expenditure is recognised as an expense and included in profit or loss.

 

(v) Derecognition

An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognised upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected from its use or disposal. Any gain or loss arising on derecognition of the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset) is included in profit or loss when the asset is derecognised.

 

(vi) Annual review of residual values, depreciation methods and useful lives

The assets’ residual value, depreciation method and useful life are reviewed at each reporting period and adjusted prospectively, if appropriate.

 

6.7 Intangible assets

 

(i) Other intangible assets

Other intangible assets include computer software. Intangible assets acquired separately are measured on initial recognition at cost. The cost of intangible assets acquired in a business combination is their fair value at the date of acquisition. Following initial recognition, intangible assets are carried at cost less any accumulated amortisation (calculated on a straight-line basis over their useful lives) and accumulated impairment losses, if any.

 

152


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Internally generated intangibles, excluding capitalised development costs, are not capitalised. Instead, the related expenditure is recognised in profit or loss in the period in which the expenditure is incurred. The useful lives of intangibles are assessed as either finite or indefinite.

Intangible assets with finite lives are amortised over their useful economic lives and assessed for impairment whenever there is an indication that the intangible asset may be impaired. The amortisation period and the amortisation method for an intangible asset with a finite useful life are reviewed at least at the end of each reporting period. Changes in the expected useful life or the expected pattern of consumption of future economic benefits embodied in the asset are considered to modify the amortisation period or method, as appropriate, and are treated as changes in accounting estimates. The amortisation expense on intangible assets with finite lives is recognised in profit or loss in the expense category that is consistent with the function of the intangible assets.

Gains or losses arising from derecognition of an intangible asset are measured as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and are recognised in profit or loss when the asset is derecognised.

 

(ii) Mineral property interests

Mineral property interests are carried at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses, if any. Gains and losses on disposal of mineral property interests are determined by comparing the proceeds from disposal with the cost less accumulated impairment losses of the asset and are recognised net within profit or loss.

Mineral property interests transferred between segments (subsidiaries) are recognised at the nominal amount paid. The resulting profit or loss caused by the transfer of mineral property interests is recognised in profit or loss of the segment (subsidiary).

 

6.8 Impairment of assets

 

(i) Non-financial assets

The carrying amounts of the Group’s non-financial assets, other than inventories and deferred tax assets, are reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, then the asset’s recoverable amount is estimated. For goodwill the recoverable amount is estimated each year at the same time.

The recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs of disposal. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using an after-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. For the purpose of impairment testing, assets are grouped together into the smallest group of assets that generates cash inflows from continuing use that are largely independent of the cash inflows of other assets or groups of assets (the “cash-generating unit”). The goodwill acquired in a business combination, for the purpose of impairment testing, is allocated to cash-generating units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination.

An impairment loss is recognised if the carrying amount of an asset or its cash-generating units exceeds its estimated recoverable amount. Impairment losses are recognised in profit or loss. Impairment losses recognised in respect of cash- generating units are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the units and then to reduce the carrying amounts of the other assets in the unit (group of units) on a pro rata basis.

An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is not reversed. In respect of other assets, impairment losses recognised in prior years are assessed at each reporting date for any indications that the loss has decreased or no longer exists. An impairment loss is reversed if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset’s carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or amortisation, if no impairment loss had been recognised.

 

(ii) Financial assets (including receivables)

A financial asset not measured at fair value through profit or loss is assessed at each reporting date to determine whether there is objective evidence that it is impaired. A financial asset is impaired if objective evidence indicates that a loss event has occurred after the initial recognition of the asset, for example:

 

    Default or delinquency by a debtor

 

    Indications that a debtor will enter into bankruptcy

and that the loss event had a negative effect on the estimated future cash flows of that asset that can be estimated reliably.

The Group considers evidence of impairment for loans and receivables at both a specific asset and collective level. All individually significant assets are assessed for specific impairment. Those found not to be specifically impaired are then collectively assessed for any impairment that has been incurred but not yet identified. Assets that are not individually significant are collectively assessed for impairment by grouping together assets with similar risk characteristics. In assessing collective impairment, the Group uses historical trends of the probability of default, the timing of recoveries and the amount of loss incurred, adjusted for management’s judgement as to whether current economic and credit conditions are such that the actual losses are likely to be greater or less than suggested by historical trends.

 

153


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

An impairment loss in respect of a financial asset measured at amortised cost is calculated as the difference between its carrying amount and the present value of the estimated future cash flows discounted at the asset’s original effective interest rate. Losses are recognised in profit or loss and reflected in an allowance account against receivables. Interest on the impaired asset continues to be recognised through the unwinding of the discount. When a subsequent event causes the amount of impairment loss to decrease, the decrease in impairment loss is reversed through profit or loss.

 

6.9 Inventories

Inventories, comprising of consumables and concentrate, are physically measured or estimated and valued at the lower of cost or net realisable value.

The cost of inventories is based on the average cost of ore in stockpiles and comprises all costs incurred to the stage immediately prior to stockpiling, including costs of extraction and crushing, as well as processing costs associated with ore stockpiles, based on the relevant stage of production.

Net realisable value is the estimated future sales price of the product the Group expects to realise when the product is processed and sold, less estimated costs to complete production and bring the product to sale. Where the time value of money is material, these future prices and costs to complete are discounted.

 

6.10 Employee benefits

 

(i) Defined contribution plans

A defined contribution plan is a post-employment benefit plan under which an entity pays fixed contributions into a separate entity and will have no legal or constructive obligation to pay further amounts. Obligations for contributions to defined contribution pension plans are recognised as an employee benefit expense in profit or loss in the years during which services are rendered by employees. Prepaid contributions are recognised as an asset to the extent that a cash refund or a reduction in future payments is available. Contributions to a defined contribution plan that are due more than 12 months after the end of the year in which the employees render the service are discounted to their present value.

 

(ii) Short-term employee benefits

Short-term employee benefit obligations are measured on an undiscounted basis and are expensed as the related service is provided.

A liability is recognised for the amount expected to be paid under short-term cash bonus or profit-sharing plans if the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation to pay this amount as a result of past service provided by the employee, and the obligation can be estimated reliably.

 

(iii) Share-based payment transactions

The grant date fair value of equity-settled share-based payment awards granted to employees is recognised as an employee cost, with a corresponding increase in equity, over the period that the employees unconditionally become entitled to the awards. The amount recognised as an expense is adjusted to reflect the number of awards for which the related service and non-market vesting conditions are expected to be met, such that the amount ultimately recognised as an expense is based on the number of awards that meet the related service and non-market performance conditions at the vesting date.

For share-based payment awards with non-vesting conditions, the grant date fair value of the share-based payment is measured to reflect such conditions and there is no true-up for differences between expected and actual outcomes.

The fair value of the amount payable to employees in respect of the share appreciation rights (SARs) or conditional share units (CSUs), which are settled in cash, is recognised as an expense with a corresponding increase in liabilities over the period that the employees unconditionally become entitled to payment. The liability is remeasured at each reporting date and at settlement date. Any changes in the fair value of the liability are recognised as employee costs in profit or loss.

The fair value of the employee share options is measured using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Measurement inputs include share price on measurement date, exercise price of the instrument, expected volatility (based on weighted average historic volatility adjusted for changes expected due to publicly available information), weighted average expected life of the instruments (based on historical experience and general option holder behaviour), expected dividends, and the risk-free interest rate (based on government bonds). Service and non-market performance conditions attached to the transactions are not taken into account in determining fair value.

The fair value of the cash-settled SARs is measured using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Measurement inputs include share price on measurement date, strike price of the instrument, expected volatility (based on weighted average historic volatility adjusted for changes expected due to publicly available information), vesting, expiry and exercise dates, expected dividends and the risk free interest rate (based on the Bond Exchange of South Africa).

 

154


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

The fair value of the equity-settled CSUs is measured using the Monte-Carlo simulation. Measurement inputs include share price on measurement date, expected volatility (based on weighted average historic volatility adjusted for changes expected due to publicly available information), vesting, expiry and exercise dates, expected dividends and dividend yield, the correlation of various stock prices in order to simulate correlated Brownian motions and the risk free interest rate (NACC - based on the Bond Exchange of South Africa).

Share-based payment arrangements in which the Group receives goods or services as consideration for its own equity instruments are accounted for as equity-settled share-based payment transactions, regardless of how the equity instruments are obtained by the Group.

 

(iv) Termination benefits

Termination benefits are recognised as an expense at the earlier of when Group can no longer withdraw the offer of those benefits and when Group recognizes costs for a restructuring. If benefits are not expected to be wholly settled within 12 months of the reporting date, then they are discounted.

 

6.11 Provisions

 

(i) General

Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. Where the Group expects some or all of a provision to be reimbursed — for example, under an insurance contract — the reimbursement is recognised as a separate asset, but only when the reimbursement is virtually certain.

If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are discounted using a current pre-tax rate that reflects, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability. Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognised as part of finance costs in profit or loss.

 

(ii) Environmental rehabilitation provision

Mine rehabilitation costs will be incurred by the Group either while operating, or at the end of the operating life of the Group’s facilities and mine properties. The Group assesses its mine rehabilitation provision at each reporting date. The Group recognises a rehabilitation provision where it has a legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, and it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate of the amount of obligation can be made. The nature of these restoration activities includes: dismantling and removing structures; rehabilitating mines and tailings dams; dismantling operating facilities; closing plant and waste sites; and restoring, reclaiming and revegetating affected areas.

The obligation generally arises when the asset is installed or the ground/environment is disturbed at the mining operation’s location. When the liability is initially recognised, the present value of the estimated costs is capitalised by increasing the carrying amount of the related mining assets to the extent that it was incurred as a result of the development/construction of the mine. Any rehabilitation obligations that arise through the production of inventory are recognised as part of the related inventory item. Additional disturbances which arise due to further development/construction at the mine are recognised as additions or charges to the corresponding assets and rehabilitation liability when they occur. Costs related to restoration of site damage (subsequent to start of commercial production) that is created on an ongoing basis during production are provided for at their net present values and recognised in profit or loss as extraction progresses.

Changes in the estimated timing of rehabilitation or changes to the estimated future costs are dealt with prospectively by recognising an adjustment to the rehabilitation liability and a corresponding adjustment to the asset to which it relates, if the initial estimate was originally recognised as part of an asset measured in accordance with IAS 16.

Any reduction in the rehabilitation liability and, therefore, any deduction from the asset to which it relates, may not exceed the carrying amount of that asset. If it does, any excess over the carrying value is recognised immediately in profit or loss. If the change in estimate results in an increase in the rehabilitation liability and, therefore, an addition to the carrying value of the asset, the Group considers whether this is an indication of impairment of the asset as a whole, and if so, tests for impairment. If, for mature mines, the estimate for the revised mine assets net of rehabilitation provisions exceeds the recoverable value, that portion of the increase is recognised in profit or loss.

Over time, the discounted liability is increased for the change in present value based on the discount rates that reflect current market assessments and the risks specific to the liability. The periodic unwinding of the discount is recognised in profit or loss as part of finance costs.

For closed sites, changes to estimated costs are recognised immediately in profit or loss.

 

(iii) Restructuring provision

Provisions for restructuring costs are recognised only when the general recognition criteria for provisions are met. A constructive obligation to restructure arises only when an entity has a detailed formal plan for the restructuring which identifies at least: the business or the part of the business concerned, principal locations affected, approximate number of employees that would need to be compensated for termination

 

155


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

resulting from the restructuring (along with their function and location), expenditure that would be required to carry out the restructuring, and information as to when the plan is to be implemented.

Furthermore, the recognition criteria also require that the entity should have raised a valid expectation among those affected by the restructuring that it will, in fact, carry out the restructuring by starting to implement that plan or announcing its main features to those affected by it.

The restructuring provision is measured at a best estimate of the expected expense involved in the restructuring plan. The restructuring plan that was announced has to be implemented and wound up by June 2016. Due to the short term nature of the provision there is no discounting of the expenses/liability.

 

6.12 Platinum Producers’ Environmental Trust

Contributions to the Platinum Producers Environmental Trust are determined on the basis of the estimated environmental obligation over the life of a mine. Contributions made are recognised in non-current investments, and are held by the Platinum Producers’ Environmental Trust. Interest earned on monies paid to rehabilitation trust funds is accrued on a time proportion basis and is recognised as finance income.

 

6.13 Revenue

Revenue arising from the sale of metals and intermediary products is recognised when the price is determinable, the product has been delivered in accordance with the terms of the contract, the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the customer and collection of the sales price is reasonably assured. These criteria are typically met when the concentrate reaches the smelter.

Revenue from the sale of metals and intermediary products in the course of ordinary activities is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Revenue further excludes value added tax and mining royalties.

 

6.14 Leases

The determination of whether an arrangement is, or contains, a lease is based on the substance of the arrangement at the date of inception. The arrangement is assessed to determine whether fulfilment is dependent on the use of a specific asset (or assets) and the arrangement conveys a right to use the asset (or assets), even if that right is not explicitly specified in an arrangement.

 

(i) Finance leases – Lessee

Finance leases, which transfer substantially all of the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased item to the Group, are capitalised at the commencement of the lease at the fair value of the leased property or, if lower, at the present value of the minimum lease payments.

Lease payments are apportioned between finance charges and reduction of the lease liability to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Finance charges are recognised in finance costs in profit or loss.

A leased asset is depreciated over the useful life of the asset. However, if there is no reasonable certainty that the Group will obtain ownership by the end of the lease term, the asset is depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset and the lease term.

 

(ii) Operating leases - Lessor

Operating lease payments are recognised as an operating expense in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Initial direct costs incurred in negotiating and arranging operating leases are added to the carrying amount of the leased asset and recognised as an expense over the lease term on the same basis as the lease income. Income for leases is disclosed under other income in profit or loss.

 

(iii) Operating leases - Lessee

Operating lease payments are recognised as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The difference between the amounts recognised as an expense and the contractual payments are recognised as an operating lease liability. This liability is not discounted.

Any contingent rents are expensed in the period they are incurred.

 

6.15 Finance income and finance costs

Finance income comprises interest income on funds invested and interest received on loans and receivables. Interest income is recognised as it accrues in profit or loss, using the effective interest method, which is the rate that exactly discounts the estimated future cash payments or receipts through the expected life of the financial instrument or a shorter period, where appropriate, to the net carrying amount of the financial asset or liability.

Finance costs comprise interest expense on borrowings, unwinding of the discount on provisions and dividends on preference shares classified as liabilities that are recognised in profit or loss. Borrowing costs that are not directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset are recognised in profit or loss using the effective interest method.

 

156


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

6.16 Income taxes

 

(i) Current income tax

Current income tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date in the countries where the Group operates and generates taxable income.

Current income tax relating to items recognised in other comprehensive income or equity is recognised in other comprehensive income or equity and not in profit or loss. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in the tax returns with respect to situations where applicable tax regulations are subject to interpretation and establishes provisions where appropriate.

 

(ii) Deferred tax

Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences between tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes at the reporting date.

Deferred tax is not recognised for the following temporary differences:

 

    the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss,

 

    In respect of taxable temporary differences relating to investments in subsidiaries to the extent that the group controls the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference and it is probable that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

 

    In addition, deferred tax is not recognised for taxable temporary differences arising on the initial recognition of goodwill.

A deferred tax asset is recognised for all deductible temporary differences, the carry-forward of unused tax credits and any unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which they can be utilised.

The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at the end of each reporting period and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be utilised. Unrecognised deferred tax assets are reassessed at the end of each reporting period and are recognised to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profit will be available to allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period.

Deferred tax relating to items recognised in other comprehensive income or equity is recognised in other comprehensive income or equity and not in profit or loss.

Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset, if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and the deferred taxes relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.

Tax benefits acquired as part of a business combination, but not satisfying the criteria for separate recognition at that date, are recognised subsequently if new information about facts and circumstances arises. The adjustment is either treated as a reduction to goodwill (as long as it does not exceed goodwill) if it occurred during the measurement period or if outside the measurement period, it is recognised in profit or loss.

 

(iii) Royalty taxes

In addition to corporate income taxes, the Group’s consolidated financial statements also include and recognise as taxes on income, other types of taxes on net income.

Royalty taxes are accounted for under IAS 12 Income Taxes when they have the characteristics of an income tax. This is considered to be the case when they are imposed under government authority and the amount payable is based on taxable income — rather than physical quantities produced or as a percentage of revenue — after adjustment for temporary differences. For such arrangements, current and deferred income tax is provided on the same basis as described above for other forms of taxation. Obligations arising from royalty arrangements and other types of taxes that do not satisfy these criteria are recognised as current provisions and included in cost of sales. The royalty taxes payable by the Group do not meet the criteria to be treated as part of income taxes.

 

6.17 Transactions with a shareholder

When a transaction is with a shareholder at terms and conditions that would not be expected from a third party, it is clear that either the company or the shareholder obtained a benefit because of the shareholder relationship. This benefit is recognised directly in equity.

In respect of loans with shareholders, the difference between the loan received or settled and the amount recognised at fair value on initial recognition or the carrying amount at settlement date, is recognised directly in equity.

 

157


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

7 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

A number of the Group’s accounting policies and disclosures require the determination of fair value, for both financial and non- financial assets and liabilities. Fair values have been determined for measurement and/or disclosure purposes based on the following methods.

When applicable, further information about the assumptions made in determining fair values is disclosed in the notes specific to that asset or liability.

When measuring the fair value of an asset or a liability, the Group uses market observable data as far as possible. Fair values are recognised into different levels in a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used in the valuation techniques as follows:

 

    Level 1: Quote (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

 

    Level 2: inputs other than quote prices included in level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices)

 

    Level 3: inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs)

The inputs used to measure the fair value of an asset or liability might be categorized in different levels of fair value hierarchy, then the fair value measurement is categorized in its entirety in the same level of fair value hierarchy as the lowest level input that is significant to the entire measurement.

 

8 FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT

The Group’s principal financial liabilities comprise trade and other payables, loans and borrowings. The main purpose of these financial instruments is to manage short-term cash flow and raise finance for the Group’s capital expenditure program. The Group’s principal financial assets comprise trade and other receivables, cash and cash equivalents that arise directly from its operations.

The Group manages its exposure to key financial risks in accordance with its financial risk management policy. The risk management policies are established to identify and analyse the risks faced by the Group, to set appropriate risk limits and controls, and to monitor risks and adherence to limits. Risk management policies and systems are reviewed regularly to reflect changes in market conditions and the Group’s activities. The Group, through its training and management standards and procedures, aims to develop a disciplined and constructive control environment in which all employees understand their roles and obligations.

The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the Group’s risk management framework.

Overview

The Group has exposure to the following risks from its use of financial instruments:

 

    credit risk

 

    liquidity risk

 

    interest rate risk

 

    commodity price risk

This note presents information about the Group’s exposure to each of the above risks, the Group’s objectives, policies and processes for measuring and managing risk and the Group’s management of capital. Further quantitative disclosures are included throughout these consolidated financial statements.

 

(i) Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations, and arises principally from the Group’s receivables from customers and cash and equivalents.

The carrying amount of financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure.

Trade and other receivables

Trade receivables represents sale of concentrate to RPM in terms of a concentrate off-take agreement. The carrying value represents the maximum credit risk exposure. The Group has no collateral against these receivables. The terms of the receivables are 90 days.

100% of the Group’s revenue is generated in South Africa from sale of concentrate by Bokoni Mine to RPM.

Cash and cash equivalents

 

158


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

At times when the Group’s cash position is positive, cash deposits are made with financial institutions having superior local credit ratings.

 

(ii) Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Group ensures that there is sufficient capital in order to meet short term business requirements, after taking into account cash flows from operations and the Group’s holdings of cash and cash equivalents. The New Senior Debt Facility and the Working Capital Facility were entered into on December 13, 2013. In addition to this the Group entered into the Term loan Facility Agreement and amended the Senior Facilities Agreement on 9 December 2015 (please refer to note 20). The Group’s cash and cash equivalents are invested in business accounts which are available on demand.

An alternative funding arrangement was entered into with RPM whereby an advance on the Purchase of Concentrate revenue (“Advance”) on the concentrate sales made to RPM by Bokoni was provided. This arrangement is available until December 31, 2015.

The Group operates in South Africa and is subject to currency exchange controls administered by the South African Reserve Bank (“SARB”). South African law provides for exchange control regulations that restrict the export of capital. The exchange control regulations, which are administered by SARB, regulate transactions involving South African residents, including legal entities, and limit a South African company’s ability to borrow from and repay loans to non-residents and to provide guarantees for the obligations of its affiliates with regard to funds obtained from non-residents.

A portion of the Company’s funding for its South African operations consists of loans advanced to its South African subsidiaries from subsidiaries that are non-residents of South Africa. The Company is in compliance with SARB regulations and is therefore not subject to restrictions on the ability of its South African subsidiaries to transfer funds to the Company or to other subsidiaries. In addition, the SARB has introduced various measures in recent years to relax the exchange controls in South Africa to entice foreign investment in the country.

However, if more burdensome exchange controls were proposed or adopted by the SARB in the future, or if the Company was unable to comply with existing SARB regulations, such exchange control regulations could restrict the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to repatriate funds needed to effectively finance the Company’s operations.

The maturity profile of the contractual undiscounted cash flows of financial instruments, including scheduled interest payments on loans and borrowings, at December 31, were as follows:

Non-derivative financial liabilities

 

     2016      2017      2018      2019      Thereafter      Total  

2015

                 

Loans and borrowings

     35,952,642         —           122,495,754         59,059,502         51,910,791         269,418,689   

Finance lease liability

     318,634         —           —           —           —           318,634   

Trade and other payables

     28,268,321         —           —           —           —           28,268,321   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     64,539,597         —           122,495,754         59,059,502         51,910,791         298,005,644   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     2015      2016      2017      2018      Thereafter      Total  

2014

                 

Loans and borrowings

     —           —           —           128,300,029         121,724,866         250,024,895   

Finance lease liabilities

     2,980,622         299,828         —           —           —           3,280,450   

Trade and other payables

     31,725,265         —           —           —           —           31,725,265   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     34,705,887         299,828         —           128,300,029         121,724,866         285,030,610   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Fair value is calculated based on the present value of future principal and interest cash flows, discounted at the market rate of interest at the reporting date.

 

(iii) Interest rate risk

Interest rate risk is the risk that the future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in the market interest rates. The Group’s exposure to the risk of changes in the market interest rates relates primarily to the Group’s long-term debt obligations with floating interest rates. The interest rate is linked to JIBAR.

The following demonstrates the sensitivity of the Group’s profit/(loss) before tax due to changes in the rate of loans and borrowings. All other variables are held constant.

 

159


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Increase /(decrease) in interest rate    Effect on loss
before tax for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
increase/(decrease)
     Effect on profit
before tax for the
year ended
December 31, 2014
increase/(decrease)
 

+1%

     2,474,710         2,614,340   

-1%

     (2,323,683      (2,412,597

 

(iv) Commodity price risk

The value of the Group’s revenue and resource properties depends on the prices of PGM’s and their outlook. The Group does not hedge its exposure to commodity price risk. PGM prices historically have fluctuated widely and are affected by numerous factors outside of the Group’s control, including, but not limited to, industrial and retail demand, forward sales by producers and speculators, levels of worldwide production, and short-term changes in supply and demand because of hedging activities. All other variables are kept constant.

 

Increase /(decrease) in 4E basket price    Effect on loss
before tax for the
year ended
December 31, 2015
(increase)/decrease
     Effect on profit
before tax for the
year ended
December 31, 2014
increase/(decrease)
 

+10%

     20,569,092         23,739,081   

-10%

     (20,569,092      (23,739,081

 

(v) Capital risk management

The primary objective of managing the Group’s capital is to ensure that there is sufficient capital available to support the funding and operating requirements of the Group in a way that optimises the cost of capital, maximizes shareholders’ returns, matches the current strategic business plan and ensures that the Group remains in a sound financial position.

The Group manages and makes adjustments to the capital structure which consists of debt and equity as and when borrowings mature or when funding is required. This may take the form of raising equity, market or bank debt or hybrids thereof. The Group may also adjust the amount of dividends paid, sell assets to reduce debt or schedule projects to manage the capital structure. Atlatsa’s ability to raise new equity in the equity capital markets is subject to the mandatory requirement that Atlatsa Holdings Proprietary Limited (“Atlatsa Holdings”) (formerly Pelawan Investments Proprietary Limited), its majority Black Economic Empowerment (“BEE”) shareholder, retain a 51% fully diluted shareholding in the Company up until December 31, 2020, as required by covenants given by Atlatsa Holdings and Atlatsa in favour of the South African Department of Mineral Resources (“DMR”), the SARB and Anglo Platinum.

There were no other changes to the Group’s approach to capital management during the year.

 

(vi) Summary of the carrying value of the Group’s financial instruments

 

At December 31, 2015    Loans and
receivables
     Financial liabilities
at amortised cost
 

Platinum Producers’ Environmental Trust**

     3,685,645         —     

Trade and other receivables*

     4,926,455         —     

Cash and cash equivalents**

     3,495,531         —     

Restricted cash*

     45,683         —     

Loans and borrowings***

     —           172,885,792   

Finance lease liability*

     —           304,435   

Trade and other payables*

     —           28,268,321   
At December 31, 2014    Loans and
receivables
     Financial liabilities
at amortised cost
 

Platinum Producers’ Environmental Trust**

     3,721,035         —     

Trade and other receivables*

     14,329,673         —     

 

160


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents**

     8,148,558         —     

Restricted cash*

     48,744         —     

Loans and borrowings***

     —           130,927,146   

Finance lease liabilities***

     —           2,918,431   

Trade and other payables*

     —           31,725,265   

 

* Not measured at fair value as carrying amount is a reasonable approximation of the fair value due to the short-term to maturity.
** Not measured at fair value as the carrying amount is a reasonable approximation of fair value due to this being cash deposits.
*** Not measured at fair value as the carrying amount is a reasonable approximation of fair value.

The following table shows the carrying amount and fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities, including their levels in the fair value hierarchy for financial instruments at fair value. It does not include the fair value information for financial assets and financial liabilities not measured at fair value, if the carrying value is a reasonable approximation of the fair value.

 

     2015      2014  
     Carrying value      Fair value
(level 2)
     Carrying value      Fair value
(level 2)
 

Loans and borrowings

     172,885,792         172,885,792         130,927,146         130,927,146   

The carrying amount of loans and borrowings approximates fair value. The loans were recognised at fair value on initial recognition and subsequently adjusted for all changes in cash flows.

The contractual value of the loans and borrowings (financial liabilities at amortised cost) at December 31, 2015 was $157,445,158 (ZAR1,759,950,347) (2014:$166,392,966 (ZAR1,655,651,405)).

 

  (a) Valuation techniques and unobservable inputs:

The following table shows the valuation techniques used in measuring level 2 fair values:

 

Type

  

Valuation technique

Loans and borrowings    Discounted cash flows

 

  (b) Key assumptions:

 

    JIBAR rates changing per quarter

 

    Cash flow assumption changes per quarter

 

    Drawdowns made in the quarter

 

9 PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

 

Summary of property, plant and equipment    2015      2014  

Cost

     

Balance at beginning of year

     808,038,782         780,046,204   

Additions

     6,005         2,177,645   

Transferred from capital work-in-progress

     45,392,534         33,853,496   

Disposals

     (14,510      (2,378,349

Adjustment to rehabilitation assets

     (1,387,613      975,833   

Effect of translation

     (93,596,702      (6,636,047
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

     758,438,496         808,038,782   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses

     

Balance at beginning of year

     161,793,446         128,867,722   

 

161


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Depreciation for the year

     37,867,916         36,456,360   

Impairment loss

     328,096,271         —     

Disposals

     (14,510      (2,040,078

Effect of translation

     (64,229,253      (1,490,558
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

     463,513,870         161,793,446   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Carrying value

     294,924,626         646,245,336   

 

2015    Total     Mining
Development
and
Infrastructure
    Plant and
Equipment
    Buildings     Motor
Vehicles
    Furniture
and Fittings
 

Cost

            

Balance at beginning of year

     808,038,782        674,593,701        87,539,747        40,959,742        4,438,317        507,275   

Additions

     6,005        —          —          —          —          6,005   

Transferred from capital work-in-progress

     45,392,534        43,366,300        1,572,699        26,359        427,176        —     

Disposals

     (14,510     —          —          —          (14,510     —     

Decrease in rehabilitation assets

     (1,387,613     (1,387,613     —          —          —          —     

Effect of translation

     (93,596,702     (78,716,011     (9,789,069     (4,502,354     (532,884     (56,384
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at the end of year

     758,438,496        637,856,377        79,323,377        36,483,747        4,318,099        456,896   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses

            

Balance at beginning of year

     161,793,446        127,052,109        21,975,106        8,869,011        3,409,754        487,466   

Depreciation for the year

     37,867,916        31,793,594        3,994,455        1,603,095        464,807        11,965   

Impairment

     328,096,272        310,174,968        10,156,150        7,314,289        444,261        6,604   

Disposals

     (14,510     —          —          —          (14,510     —     

Effect of translation

     (64,229,254     (57,436,818     (4,162,098     (2,093,321     (481,303     (55,714
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

     463,513,870        411,583,853        31,963,613        15,693,074        3,823,009        450,321   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Carrying Value

     294,924,626        226,272,524        47,359,764        20,790,673        495,090        6,575   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

162


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

2014    Total     Mining
Development and
Infrastructure
    Plant and
Equipment
    Buildings     Motor
Vehicles
    Furniture and
Fittings
 

Cost

            

Balance at beginning of year

     780,046,204        647,929,105        86,779,486        40,667,146        4,170,611        499,856   

Additions

     2,177,645        2,176,310        —          —          —          1,335   

Transferred from capital work-in-progress

     33,853,496        31,340,590        1,475,915        622,308        414,683        —     

Disposals

     (2,378,349     (2,268,496     —          —          (109,853     —     

Increase in rehabilitation assets

     975,833        975,833        —          —          —          —     

Effect of translation

     (6,636,047     (5,559,641     (705,604     (329,712     (37,124     (3,966
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

     808,038,782        674,593,701        87,549,797        40,959,742        4,438,317        497,225   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses

            

Balance at beginning of year

     128,867,722        101,936,589        16,801,342        6,797,720        2,903,176        428,895   

Depreciation for the year

     36,456,360        28,295,702        5,380,371        2,154,577        608,105        17,605   

Disposals

     (2,040,078     (1,965,850     —          —          (74,228     —     

Effect of translation

     (1,490,558     (1,214,332     (206,607     (83,286     (27,299     40,966   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

     161,793,446        127,052,109        21,975,106        8,869,011        3,409,754        487,466   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Carrying Value

     646,245,336        547,541,592        65,574,691        32,090,731        1,028,563        9,759   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Certain assets are encumbered. The Senior Debt Facility was secured through various security instruments, guarantees and undertakings provided by the Group against 51% of the cash flows generated by the Bokoni Mine, together with 51% of the Bokoni Mine asset base.

Due to the economic climate and the significant re-rate in forecasted metal prices, the Group tested the carrying value of its assets for impairment and recognised an impairment loss of $337,064,465 with respect to property, plant and equipment and goodwill (refer to note 13).

Management has assessed its cash-generating unit (“CGU”) as being Bokoni Mine, which is the lowest level for which cash flows are largely independent of other assets. The goodwill relates to the acquisition of Bokoni Mine. Impairment losses recognised in respect of CGU’s are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the units and then to reduce the carrying amount of other assets in the unit (group of units) on a pro rata basis (refer note 13).

The recoverable amount of mining assets and goodwill reviewed for impairment is determined based on value-in-use calculations. All mining assets and goodwill are allocated to one CGU. Key assumptions relating to this valuation include the discount rate and cash flows used to determine the value-in-use. Future cash flows are estimated based on financial budgets approved by management which is based on the mine’s life-of-mine plan. Management determines the expected performance of the mine based on past performance and its expectations of market developments which are incorporated into a life-of-mine plan.

Key assumptions used in the value-in-use calculation of the impairment assessment of mining assets were the following:

 

    Life-of-mine – 37 years (2014: 36 years).

 

    Real weighted average cost of capital – 12.55% (2014: 10.97%).

 

    Average price deck for PGM prices was used. Initial price of US$995/oz (2014: US$1,742/oz) for platinum in 2015.

 

    Range of R/US$ real exchange rates – based on market expectations. Initial exchange rate of R13.91/US$ (2014: R9.33/US$) used in 2015.

 

    South African inflation – based on market expectations. Long term inflation rate of 5.50% (2014: 5.40%).

 

    Production of 4E ounces starts at 201,868 (2014: 203,889) ounces in 2015, building up to 364,379 (2014: 370,691) ounces in 2037 and gradually scales down towards the end of the life of mine.

Sensitivity analysis:

 

Sensitivity

   Real WACC     95%      100%
(Base NPV in
millions)
     105%  

Price (4E basket)

     12.55     202.64         309.46         414.02   

 

163


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Production volumes

     12.55     202.64         309.46         414.02   

Operating cost

     12.55     383.30         309.46         234.39   

WACC

     12.55     341.55         309.46         280.84   

Capital expenditure

     12.55     323.19         309.46         295.74   

 

10 CAPITAL WORK-IN-PROGRESS

Capital work-in-progress consists of mine development and infrastructure costs relating to the Bokoni Mine and will be transferred to property, plant and equipment when the relevant projects are commissioned.

 

     2015      2014  

Balance at beginning of year

     29,272,118         27,296,481   

Additions

     25,684,322         32,891,360   

Transfer to property, plant and equipment

     (45,392,534      (33,853,496

Capitalisation of borrowing costs

     766,579         3,183,868   

Effect of translation

     (1,132,508      (246,095
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

     9,197,977         29,272,118   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Capital work-in-progress is funded through cash generated from operations and available loan facilities (refer note 20).

 

11 OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

 

Cost

     

Balance at beginning of year

     2,485,100         2,504,882   

Additions

     —           —     

Effect of translation

     (272,990      (19,782
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

     2,212,110         2,485,100   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Accumulated amortisation and impairment losses

     

Balance at beginning of year

     2,195,710         2,178,532   

Amortisation for the year

     34,383         34,862   

Effect of translation

     (244,978      (17,684
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

     1,985,115         2,195,710   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Carrying value

     226,995         289,390   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The intangible asset relates to the implementation of a SAP system throughout the Group during 2011. The asset is amortised on a straight line basis over ten years.

 

12 MINERAL PROPERTY INTERESTS

 

     2015      2014  

Balance at beginning of year

     7,339,706         7,612,443   

Amortisation

     (117,527      (251,394

Write-off*

     —           (709,665

 

164


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Effect of translation

     (263,322      688,322   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

     6,958,857         7,339,706   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

* This relates to the write off of the cost of Paschaskraal and De Kamp remaining after the sale of the two farms. Refer to (i) below.

The Group’s mineral property interest consists of various early stage exploration projects as detailed below:

 

(i) Ga-Phasha

The mineral title relating to the Ga-Phasha Project was held by Ga-Pasha Platinum Mines Proprietary Limited (“Ga-Phasha”). On December 13, 2013, the Company sold two (Paschaskraal and De Kamp) of the four farms in Ga-Phasha to RPM as part of the refinancing and restructuring plan of the Group and Klipfontein and Avoca were incorporated into Bokoni Mine.

 

(ii) Platreef

As of July 1, 2009, the Group holds an effective 51% in Platreef properties located on the Northern Limb of the Bushveld Igneous Complex (“BIC”) in South Africa. The Group has received conversion to new order prospecting rights in respect of all Platreef mineral properties.

 

(iii) Boikgantsho

As of July 1, 2009, the Boikgantsho joint venture agreements terminated and Boikgantsho Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited (“BPM”), a private company incorporated under the laws of South Africa, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bokoni Holdco, acquired the interest in and assets relating to the Boikgantsho Project. On December 13, 2013, the Company sold the BPM mineral assets to RPM as part of the refinancing and restructuring plan of the Group.

 

(iv) Kwanda

As of July 1, 2009, the Kwanda joint venture agreements terminated and Kwanda Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited, a private company incorporated under the laws of South Africa, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bokoni Holdco, acquired the interest in assets relating to the Kwanda Project. Atlatsa owns an effective 51% interest in this project. The Group received conversion to new order prospecting rights for the Kwanda North and Kwanda South properties.

 

(v) Rietfontein

The Group has entered into an agreement (the “Agreement”) effective December 11, 2009 with Ivanhoe Nickel & Platinum Limited (“Ivanplats”) relating to the Rietfontein property located on the Northern Limb of the BIC. Salient terms of the Agreement are as follows:

 

    The existing joint operation (“JO”) between the parties is amended such that the current Rietfontein JO is extended to incorporate a defined area of Ivanplats’ adjacent Turfspruit mineral property. Both parties retain their existing prospecting rights in respect of mineral properties in their own names but make these rights and technical information available to the extended JO (“the Extended JO”).

 

    Atlatsa will be entitled to appoint a member to the Extended JO technical committee and all technical programmes going forward will be carried out with input from Atlatsa.

 

    Atlatsa is awarded a 6% free carried interest in the Extended JO, provided that the Extended JO contemplates an open pit mining operation, incorporating the Rietfontein mineral property. Atlatsa has no financial obligations under the Extended JO terms and Ivanplats is required to fund the entire exploration programme to feasibility study with no financial recourse to Atlatsa. On delivery of the feasibility study, Atlatsa may elect to either:

 

    Retain a participating interest of 6% in the Extended JO and finance its pro rata share of the project development going forward; or

 

    Relinquish its participating interest of 6% in the Extended JO in consideration for a 5% net smelter return royalty in respect of mineral products extracted from those areas of the Rietfontein mineral property forming part of the Extended JO mineral properties.

The operation is dormant with no exploration activities currently taking place except for activities to maintain the prospecting right, which is for the cost of Ivanplats.

 

13 GOODWILL

 

165


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

     2015      2014  

Balance at beginning of year

     8,776,080         8,845,940   

Impairment loss

     (8,968,194      —     

Effect of translation

     192,114         (69,860
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

     —           8,776,080   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Goodwill arises principally because of the following factors:

 

    The going concern value implicit in our ability to sustain and/or grow our business by increasing reserves and resource through new discoveries

 

    The requirement to recognise deferred tax assets and liabilities for the difference between the assigned values and the tax bases of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination.

For impairment considerations, refer to notes 4 and 9. The goodwill relates to the acquisition of Bokoni Mine.

 

14 PLATINUM PRODUCERS’ ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST

The Group contributes to the Platinum Producers’ Environmental Trust annually. The Trust was created to fund the estimated cost of pollution control, rehabilitation and mine closure at the end of the lives of the Group’s mines. Contributions are determined on the basis of the estimated environmental obligation over the life of a mine. The Group’s share of the cash deposits made is reflected in non-current cash deposits held by the Platinum Producers’ Environmental Trust.

 

     2015      2014  

Balance at beginning of year

     3,721,035         3,292,979   

Contributions

     301,318         358,912   

Growth in environmental trust

     118,127         101,475   

Effect of translation

     (454,835      (32,331
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

     3,685,645         3,721,035   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The non-current cash deposits are restricted in use as it is to be used exclusively for pollution control, rehabilitation and mine closure at the end of lives of the Group’s mines. Any shortfall is covered by guarantees issued by RPM.

 

15 INVENTORIES

 

Consumables

     724,443         283,988   

Stock pile

     829,429         442,355   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
     1,553,872         726,343   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

16 TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

 

Financial assets

     

Trade receivables

     —           9,863,567   

Other trade receivables

     4,926,455         4,466,106   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
     4,926,455         14,329,673   

Non-financial assets

     

Prepayments

     677,201         1,532,489   

Lease debtor

     2,058         2,312   

Value added tax

     1,017         3,875   

Employee receivables

     691,605         388,435   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total trade and other receivables

     6,298,336         16,256,784   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Trade receivables are non-interest bearing and are on terms of 90 days. The Group has one major customer with an outstanding account within

 

166


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

the agreed payment terms. As a result, no allowance for impairment losses has been recognised (2014: $nil).

 

17 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

 

     2015      2014  

Bank balances

     3,495,531         8,148,558   

Cash at banks earns interest at floating rates based on daily bank deposit rates.

For the purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents comprise only the above balances as the Group has no bank overdrafts.

 

18 RESTRICTED CASH

 

ESOP Trust

     45,683         48,744   

Restricted cash consist of cash and cash equivalents held by the Bokoni Platinum Mine Employee Share Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) Trust. The reserve is not available to finance the Group’s day-to-day operations and therefore has been excluded from cash and cash equivalents for purposes of the statement of cash flows.

During the year, there were no distributions to beneficiaries in terms of the trust deed (2014: $224,121 (ZAR2,184,412)).

 

19 SHARE CAPITAL

Authorised and issued

 

     Number of shares  
     2015      2014  

Common shares with no par value

     554,421,806         554,288,473   

The Company’s authorised share capital consists of an unlimited number of common shares without par value. In January 2014, the Convertible Preference shares were converted into common shares. A further 125,000,000 shares were issued as part of the restructuring transaction.

 

Share capital

     

Share capital

     311,874,472         311,842,616   

Share issue costs

     (2,183,033      (2,183,033
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
     309,691,439         309,659,583   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Treasury shares

     4,991,726         4,991,726   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Treasury shares relate to shares held by the ESOP Trust in Atlatsa, which is consolidated by the Group.

 

Share capital reconciliation

     

Opening balance at 1 January

     311,842,616         311,842,616   

Shares issued

     31,856         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Closing balance as at 31 December

     311,874,472         311,842,616   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

$162.9 million (ZAR1.1 billion) was raised through share-settled financing with the issue of cumulative mandatory convertible “B” preference shares (“B Prefs”) to RPM and a subsidiary of Atlatsa Holdings to finance the 51% acquisition in Bokoni Holdco on July 1, 2009. The final effects of the share settled financing will result in RPM receiving a fixed number of 115.8 million common shares of Atlatsa and Atlatsa Holdings, Atlatsa’s controlling shareholder, receiving a fixed number of 111.6 million common shares. These preference shares are convertible upon the earlier of the date of receipt of a conversion notice from RPM and July 1, 2018. A dividend was to be declared on

 

167


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

the last business day immediately prior to the conversion date, in terms of a formula set out in the preference share subscription agreement.

On January 14, 2014, these shares were converted as a result of the Group’s refinancing plan. A dividend of $24.6 million (ZAR240.6 million) was declared on redemption at a Plateau level.

 

20 LOANS AND BORROWINGS

 

     2015      2014  

RPM – Working Capital Facility (related party)

     9,092,256         5,948,787   

RPM – New Senior Debt Facility (related party)

     127,745,462         124,453,505   

RPM – POC Advance (related party)

     35,952,642         —     

Other

     95,432         524,854   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
     172,885,792         130,927,146   

Short-term portion of loans and borrowings

     

RPM – POC Advance

     (35,952,642      —     

Other

     (95,432      (524,854
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Long-term portion of loans and borrowings

     136,837,718         130,402,292   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The carrying value of the Group’s loans and borrowings changed during the year as follows:

 

Balance at beginning of the year

     130,927,146         187,016,588   

Loans repaid – Other

     (498,229      (652,039

Loan from RPM – New Senior Debt Facility

     —           6,250,317   

Loan repaid – New Senior Debt Facility

     —           (74,782,500

Loan from RPM – Working Capital Facility

     3,477,500         2,526,305   

Loan from RPM – Shareholder loan

     2,825,282         6,005,206   

Loan from RPM – POC Advance

     40,389,454         —     

Shareholder loan capitalised

     (2,833,641      (12,480,278

Finance expenses accrued

     19,646,355         17,039,491   

Fair value gain on additional draw down of New Senior Debt Facility

     —           (1,109,648

AG8 adjustment on New Senior Debt Facility

     314,840         3,233,584   

Effect of translation

     (21,362,915      (2,119,880
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at end of the year

     172,885,792         130,927,146   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The fair value adjustments of the consolidated facility and New Senior Debt facility and subsequent adjustments are made up of the following:

 

     2015      2014  

Subsequent adjustments (refer note 28)

     314,840         3,233,584   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
     314,840         3,233,584   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The terms and conditions for the outstanding borrowings at December 31, 2015 are as follows:

 

(i) RPM – New Senior Debt Facility

On May 5, 2014, Anglo Platinum’s Board of Directors authorised an amount of $14.3 million (R160 million) of accrued and unpaid interest to accrue above the facility limit of $138.7 million (R1,550 million) up to December 31, 2015.

 

168


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

On December 9, 2015 the New Senior Facilities Agreement was amended and restated to increase the availability under the facility by $6.4 million (ZAR71.4 million). As at December 31, 2015, the facility under the New Senior Debt Facility is $145.1 million (ZAR1,621 million) (2014: $138.7 million (ZAR1,550 million)) (Refer note 2).

 

(ii) RPM – Working Capital Facility

On December 13, 2013, Plateau and RPM entered into a Working Capital Facility whereby RPM will make a maximum of $2.7 million (ZAR30 million) per year available to Plateau during each of 2013, 2014 and 2015 for an aggregate facility of $8.1 million (ZAR90 million), including capitalised interest to fund Atlatsa’s corporate and administrative expenses through to 2015.

Pursuant to the terms of the Working Capital Facility, interest will be charged on the outstanding amounts of the Working Capital Facility at a three-month JIBAR plus 4% per annum. The balance of the Working Capital Facility cannot exceed $8.1 million (ZAR90 million) at any time. Atlatsa cannot pay any dividends until the Working Capital Facility is fully repaid. The Working Capital Facility will be repayable in full by December 31, 2018. The Company was not entitled to the Working Capital Facility until, amongst other things, the conditions precedent to implement Phase Two had been met (which were only met on December 12, 2013).

Prior to implementation of Phase Two of the Restructure Plan and as an interim measure pursuant to closing of the Restructure Plan, the parties agreed to a Transaction Cost Loan Agreement, as signed and implemented on May 28, 2013. A facility of $2.0 million (ZAR22.5 million) was made available under this agreement. The additional facility of $9.8 million (ZAR110 million) under the Amendment Agreement, implemented on May 28, 2013 was inclusive of the $2.0 million (ZAR22.5 million) provided for under the Transaction Cost Loan Agreement.

As at September 30, 2013 a drawdown of $0.6 million (ZAR7 million) was made under the Transaction Cost Loan Agreement. On December 13, 2013 the $0.6 million (ZAR7 million) inclusive of interest was repaid from the draw down on the Working Capital Facility. Please refer to the going concern note for further information regarding the Working Capital Facility.

On May 25, 2015 the Working Capital facility was increased to $10.9 million (ZAR122 million). As at December 31, 2015 the outstanding contractual balance was $9.1 million (ZAR101,6 million). The amount available under the Working Capital Facility was $1.8 million (ZAR20.4 million).

 

(iii) RPM – Shareholder loan

The treatment of this shareholder’s loan is to be decided by the Bokoni Holdco Board of Directors as per the Bokoni Holdco Shareholders Agreement. This loan bears no interest and no repayment terms. The loan was capitalised (debt repaid using proceeds of share subscription) on August 21, 2015.

 

(iv) Other

This loan is between Plateau and the Deloitte Mining Shared Service Centre (“DMSSC”) relating to the financing of the SAP system (refer note 11). The loan bears interest at prime (9.75% at December 31, 2015) plus 2% (2014: 9.25% at December 31, 2014) and is payable in quarterly instalments starting March 31, 2011.

 

(v) Security

The Senior Term Loan Facility was secured through various security instruments, guarantees and undertakings provided by the Group against 51% of the cash flows generated by the Bokoni Mine, together with 51% of the Bokoni Mine asset base. The New Senior Debt Facility is secured in the same manner as the Senior Term Loan Facility.

Atlatsa Holdings will provide security to RPM in relation to the Atlatsa Holdings Vendor Finance Loan by way of a pledge and cession of its entire shareholding in Atlatsa, which shares remain subject to a lock-in arrangement through to 2020. Should Atlatsa Holdings be unable to meet its minimum repayment commitments under the Atlatsa Holdings Vendor Finance Loan between 2018 to 2020, Atlatsa will have a discretionary right, with no obligation, to step in and remedy such obligation in order to protect its BEE shareholding status, subject to commercial terms being agreed between Atlatsa Holdings and Atlatsa for that purpose and receipt of the necessary regulatory and shareholder approvals.

 

(vi) RPM – POC Advance

In addition to the other facilities provided, RPM agreed to fund the Bokoni Mine, pursuant to the Advance on Concentrate Revenue Agreement (the “POC Advance”), with an advance on the sale of concentrate revenue made to RPM pursuant to the Concentrate Agreement, at an interest rate of three-month JIBAR plus 1.41% per annum, from November 1, 2013 to November 30, 2014.

The Advance provided that RPM may advance funds to Bokoni up to an amount equal to the lower of 90% of an advance on revenue for the preceding two months and $36.2 million (ZAR360.0 million), provided that the amount advanced does not exceed the actual cash requirements for that month. The terms of the Advance were re-negotiated in March 2014 to permit RPM to advance funds to Bokoni up to an amount equal to the lower of 95% of an advance on revenue for the preceding two months and $47.7 million (ZAR475.0 million), provided that the amount

 

169


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

advanced does not exceed the actual cash requirements of Bokoni Mine for that month, and to extend the term of the Advance to March 30, 2015. In July 2014, the Advance was amended to extend the term of the agreement to December 31, 2015.

Drawdowns pursuant to the Advance of $74.5 million (ZAR832.2 million) were made against the concentrate revenue in Q4 2015, of which $48.6 million (ZAR542.8 million) was already recovered and $1.7 million (ZAR17.4 million) will be recovered as part of revenue received from RPM after the date hereof. RPM advanced additional funds (not supported by physical metal deliveries) on the purchase of concentrate agreement of $35.9 million (ZAR401,9 million) to secure short term funding until all conditions precedent on the Term Loan facility provided by RPM as discussed below, had been met and this facility could be utilized to fund the Bokoni operations (refer to note 2).

The Group’s debt is denominated in ZAR.

 

21 FINANCE LEASE LIABILITY

 

     2015      2014  

Finance lease – Fermel

     304,435         931,429   

Finance lease – Atlas Copco

     —           1,987,002   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total finance lease liability

     304,435         2,918,431   

Short-term portion of finance lease liability

     

Finance lease – Fermel

     (304,435      (647,552

Finance lease – Atlas Copco

     —           (1,987,002
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
     (304,435      (2,634,554
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Long-term portion of finance lease liability

     —           283,877   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The carrying value of the Group’s finance lease liability changed during the year as follows:

 

Balance at beginning of the year

     2,918,431         —     

Finance lease entered into – Fermel

     —           1,150,869   

Finance lease entered into – Atlas Copco

     —           2,176,310   

Lease repayment

     (2,922,491      (609,887

Finance expenses accrued

     346,064         241,794   

Effect of translation

     (37,569      (40,655
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at end of the year

     304,435         2,918,431   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The terms of the lease are as follows:

 

Interest rate

     2% - 22.1%         2% - 22.1%   

Lease term

     13 months – 2 years         13 months – 2 years   

Carrying amount of leased assets*

     955,685         2,902,602   

 

* Included under Mining Development and Infrastructure (refer to note 9).

Bokoni entered into instalment sale agreements with Fermel Proprietary Limited (“Fermel”) and Atlas Copco South Africa Proprietary Limited (“Atlas Copco”) for the lease of equipment.

Ownership of the equipment leased from Fermel will be transferred to Bokoni when all amounts due in terms of the agreements have been paid. The Atlas Copco agreement provides for an option to purchase the equipment at the end of the lease term. Management did not exercise the option to purchase the machinery at the end of the lease term.

The finance lease liabilities are payable as follows:

 

170


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

2015    Less than one year      Between two and
five years
 

Future minimum lease payments

     318,634         —     

Interest

     (14,199      —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Present value of minimum lease payments

     304,435         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
2014    Less than one year      Between two and
five years
 

Future minimum lease payments

     2,980,622         299,828   

Interest

     (346,068      (15,951
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Present value of minimum lease payments

     2,634,554         283,877   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

22 DEFERRED TAX

Deferred tax liabilities and assets on the statement of financial position relate to the following:

 

     2015      2014  

Deferred tax liabilities

     

Property plant and equipment (including capital work-in-progress)

     76,642,072         189,131,819   

Prepayments

     30,341         380,003   

Environmental trust fund contributions

     831,319         849,541   

Fair value gain on consolidated debt facility

     8,172,196         19,077,880   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liability

     85,630,928         209,439,243   

Deferred tax assets

     

Provision for environmental liabilities

     (3,855,532      (3,740,035

Unredeemed capital expenditure

     (60,429,352      (60,306,622

Accrual for employee leave liabilities

     (1,556,199      (1,467,234

Liability for share-based compensation

     (46,163      (309,186

Calculated tax losses

     (57,803,759      (56,478,438

Deferred tax asset not recognised

     85,688,864         33,394,489   

Foreign exchange losses

     (3,869,872      (2,695,622

Other items

     (2,946,995      (1,091,704
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total deferred tax asset

     (44,819,008      (92,694,352
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net deferred tax liability

     40,811,920         116,744,891   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The movement in the net deferred tax liability recognised in the statement of financial position is as follows:

 

     2015      2014  

Balance at beginning of year

     116,744,891         124,519,382   

Current year

     (70,895,943      (6,885,352

Effect of translation

     (5,037,028      (889,139
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
     40,811,920         116,744,891   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

As at December 31, the Group had not recognised the following net deferred tax assets:

 

171


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

     2015      2014  

Deferred tax assets

     85,688,864         33,394,489   

The unrecognised temporary differences are:

     

Unredeemed capital expenditure

     60,429,352         60,306,622   

Tax losses

     57,803,759         56,478,438   

Other deductible temporary differences

     (36,414,119      (86,086,193

Foreign exchange losses

     3,869,872         2,695,622   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
     85,688,864         33,394,489   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Deferred tax assets have not been recognised for the above temporary differences as it is not probable that the respective Group entities to which they relate will generate future taxable income against which to utilise the temporary differences.

Gross calculated tax losses expire as follows:

 

     2015      2014  

2016-2019

     (2,290,393      (2,121,387

Thereafter

     (10,774,480      (12,690,008

Indefinitely

     (194,310,327      (187,955,270
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
     (207,375,200      (202,766,665
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

23 PROVISIONS

 

Non-current provisions    2015      2014  

Rehabilitation provision

     

Balance at beginning of the year

     13,357,268         11,100,511   

Capitalised to property, plant and equipment

     (1,387,613      975,833   

Unwinding of interest

     1,131,355         909,842   

Recognised in profit or loss

     2,368,031         491,405   

Effect of translation

     (1,699,285      (120,323
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

     13,769,756         13,357,268   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Future net obligations

     

Undiscounted rehabilitation cost

     23,366,437         19,255,117   

Amount invested in environmental trust fund (refer note 14)

     (3,685,645      (3,721,035
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total future net obligation – Undiscounted

     19,680,792         15,534,082   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The Group makes full provision for the future cost of rehabilitating mine sites and related production facilities on a discounted basis at the time of developing the mines and installing those facilities.

The rehabilitation provision represents the present value of rehabilitation costs relating to mine sites, which are expected to be incurred up to 2039, which is when the producing mine properties are expected to cease operations. These provisions have been created on the Group’s internal estimates. Assumptions based on the current economic environment have been made, which management believes are a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the future liability. These estimates are reviewed regularly to take into account any material changes to the assumptions. However, actual rehabilitation costs will ultimately depend upon future market prices for necessary rehabilitation works required that will reflect market conditions at the relevant time. Furthermore, the timing of rehabilitation is likely to depend on when the mine ceases to produce at economically viable rates. This, in turn, will depend on future PGM prices, which are inherently uncertain.

The Group intends to finance the ultimate rehabilitation costs from the money invested in environmental trust funds, ongoing contributions as well as the proceeds on sale of assets and metals from plant clean-up at the time of mine closure.

Key assumptions used in determining the provision:

 

172


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

     2015     2014  

Discount period – Underground

     23.5 years        24.5 years  

Discount period – Opencast mine

     2.5 years        9 years   

South African discount rate (risk free rate)

     9.63     7.96

South African inflation

     5.50     5.40

The method used in the sensitivity analysis is to assume a change in basis points. The change in basis point is applied to one variable while the other variable remains constant.

 

Sensitivity – change in provision    Inflation rate (discount
rate constant)
     Inflation rate (discount
rate constant)
 

1% increase

     1,678,009         2,033,888   

1% decrease

     (1,388,698      (1,596,887
Sensitivity – change in provision    Discount rate (inflation
rate constant)
     Discount rate (inflation
rate constant)
 

1% increase

     (1,329,897      (1,498,727

1% decrease

     1,625,049         1,915,785   

 

24 TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES

 

Financial liabilities

     

Trade payables

     24,642,829         25,280,799   

Other payables

     3,625,492         6,444,466   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
     28,268,321         31,725,265   

Non-financial liabilities

     

Payroll accruals

     2,410,682         2,341,658   

Leave liabilities

     4,661,063         4,891,735   

Share-appreciation rights

     164,868         1,104,235   

Lease accrual

     37,871         42,681   

Other accruals

     69,755         87,697   

Deferred income

     873         454,561   

Value added tax

     945,055         1,022,968   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total trade and other payables

     36,558,488         41,670,800   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Trade and other payables are non-interest bearing and are normally settled on 30-day terms.

 

25 RESTRUCTURING PROVISION

 

Restructuring provision

     10,679,595         —     

Effect of translation

     (1,173,161      —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at the end of the year

     9,506,434         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

173


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

On the September 16, 2015 the Group announced the implementation of a Restructure Plan at Bokoni Mine as discussed in note 2.

Bokoni Mine remains in development with its key underground operations, Middelpunt Hill (UG2) and Brakfontein (Merensky), estimated to achieve steady state production by the fourth quarter of 2016 and by 2019, respectively. Given various operational and market related challenges experienced during the ramp up phase of the two operations, Bokoni Mine has had to ensure that its older, higher cost Merensky operations at the Vertical and UM2 shafts remained operational for longer than originally contemplated, a position which is no longer sustainable in light of limited available ore reserves remaining at these shaft operations and continued depressed Platinum Group Metal (“PGM”) prices.

To ensure the future sustainability of Bokoni Mine, the Company has had to implement an operational and financial restructure plan at Bokoni Mine (the “Restructure Plan”). The primary objective of the Restructure Plan is to enable Bokoni Mine to endure a prolonged period of depressed PGM commodity prices, by reducing its existing cost structure and increasing production volumes of higher grade ore from underground operations.

The Restructuring provision includes costs associated with a significant labour restructuring, legal, human resources and security related charges associated directly with the restructuring.

 

26 REVENUE

Revenue from mining operations by commodity:

 

     2015      2014      2013  

Platinum

     117,012,850         138,260,962         120,127,718   

Palladium

     47,796,554         51,141,257         38,233,831   

Rhodium

     9,719,897         11,367,006         8,404,880   

Nickel

     15,323,897         20,878,678         14,684,989   

Other

     15,837,724         15,742,911         14,170,034   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total revenue

     205,690,922         237,390,814         195,621,452   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Revenue consists of the sale of concentrate to RPM (a related party), net of VAT and trade discounts.

 

27 COST OF SALES

 

     2015      2014      2013  

Cost of sales includes:

        

Labour

     100,198,058         98,638,517         89,037,773   

Stores

     43,273,534         44,487,865         39,065,648   

Power and compressed air

     15,819,267         15,355,223         13,958,444   

Contractors cost

     34,154,489         41,453,468         29,155,947   

Other costs

     29,485,024         28,228,216         22,767,295   

Inventory movement

     (371,489      (182,093      422,723   

Depreciation

     38,015,327         36,777,006         39,368,466   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total cost of sales

     260,574,210         264,758,202         233,776,296   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

28 FAIR VALUE GAIN

On December 13, 2013 Atlatsa and Anglo Platinum announced the completion of the Phase Two of the refinancing plan for the refinancing, recapitalisation and restructure of the Group. In terms of Phase Two of the refinancing plan, the New Senior Debt Facility between the Company as borrower, and RPM as lender, was amended to increase the total amount available, and this amount was utilised to repay the amounts owed to RPM under the Consolidated Debt Facility.

As a result of this debt consolidation and associated interest rate adjustment, the Company has recognised fair value gains and adjustments in accordance with IAS 39, Application Guidance 8 (“AG8 adjustments”) of $47.9 million (ZAR448.6 million) in its 2013 financial statements, representing the fair value difference between the Company’s new costs of borrowing under the New Senior Debt Facility compared to a market related cost of borrowing available to the Company. During 2015, RPM acquired additional shares in Bokoni Holdco for $2,833,641 (2014: $12,480,278; 2013: $199,179,381) as part of the refinancing plan.

 

174


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

There was no fair value or AG8 adjustment attributable to non-controlling interests as their portion of the loan was capitalised.

 

2015    Through
profit/loss
(Owners of the
Company)
     Through
profit/loss (Non-
Controlling
interest)
     Total – through
profit/loss
     Directly in
equity (Non-
controlling
interest)
 

AG8 adjustments on New Senior Debt Facility

     314,480         —           314,840         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     314,480         —           314,480         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The AG8 adjustment relates to revised estimates of payments and receipts (cash flows) by the end of December 31, 2015 as compared to cash flows used in computing the fair value at December 31, 2014.

 

2014    Through
profit/loss
(Owners of the
Company)
     Through profit/loss
(Non-Controlling
interest)
     Total – through
profit/loss
     Directly in
equity (Non-
controlling
interest)
 

Fair value gain of drawdowns on the New Senior Debt Facility

     (1,109,648      —           (1,109,648      —     

AG8 adjustment on New Senior Debt Facility*

     3,233,584         —           3,233,584         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     2,123,936         —           2,123,936         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The AG8 adjustment relates to revised estimates of payments and receipts (cash flows) by the end of December 31, 2014 as compared to cash flows used in computing the fair value at December 13, 2013.

 

29 OTHER EXPENSES

 

     2015      2014      2013  

Components of other expenses:

        

Transaction costs

     80,466         457,919         1,688,165   

Impairment loss of property, plant and equipment and goodwill

     337,064,465         —           —     

Fair value loss and AG8 adjustments on loans and borrowings

     314,480         2,123,936         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     337,459,411         2,581,855         1,688,165   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

30 OTHER INCOME

 

Components of other income:

        

Realised foreign exchange gains

     —           31,133         321,476   

Profit on sale of assets

     —           4,076         171,113,397   

Rental income

     19,209         —           —     

Other fee income

     105         —           —     

Fair value gain and AG8 adjustments on loans and borrowings

     —           —           47,999,163   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     19,314         35,209         219,434,036   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

31 FINANCE INCOME

 

Financial assets at amortised cost

        

Platinum Producers’ Environmental Trust

     118,127         101,475         78,427   

Bank accounts

     119,424         195,520         252,164   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     237,551         296,995         330,591   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

175


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

32 FINANCE COSTS

 

Financial liabilities at amortised cost

        

Consolidated debt facility

     —           —           55,837,155   

New Senior Debt Facility

     18,741,815         16,500,115         1,197,435   

Working Capital Facility

     848,518         448,351         15,328   

Fermel – Instalment Sale Agreement

     75,061         60,056         —     

Atlas Copco – Instalment Sale Agreement

     271,003         181,738         —     

Transaction Cost Facility

     —           —           20,223   

Advance on Purchase of Concentrate revenue

     3,525,271         1,261,697         17,454   

Other

     56,209         91,741         160,304   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     23,517,877         18,543,698         57,247,899   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-financial liabilities

        

Notional interest – rehabilitation provision

     1,131,355         909,842         647,680   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     1,131,355         909,842         647,680   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total finance costs before interest capitalised

     24,649,232         19,453,540         57,895,579   

Interest capitalised

     (766,578      (3,183,867      (1,502,507
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total finance costs

     23,882,654         16,269,673         56,393,072   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The capitalisation rate used to determine the amount of borrowing costs eligible for capitalisation during the year is 14.11% (2014:13.72%, 2013:13.94%).

 

33 (LOSS)/PROFIT BEFORE INCOME TAX

(Loss)/profit before income tax as stated includes the following:

 

     2015      2014      2013  

Operating lease expense – buildings

     153,553         158,234         164,189   

Share-based payment expense – equity settled

     2,158,793         470,547         21,783   

Share-based payment expense – cash settled

     (919,021      (2,180,491      (837,758

Depreciation and amortisation

     38,019,826         36,742,616         39,785,169   

 

34 INCOME TAX

 

SA normal taxation

      

Deferred tax – current year

     (70,895,943     (6,885,722     (3,190,116

Capital Gains Tax

     —          —          7,043,536   

Securities Transfer Tax

     —          353,374        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
     (70,895,943     (6,532,348     3,853,420   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Tax rate reconciliation

      

Statutory Canadian tax rate

     (26.0 %)      (26.0 %)      25.75

Non-deductable expenditure

     0.42     0.04     0.07

Impairment of assets

     25.77     —          —     

 

176


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Depreciation on mineral rights

     0.13     3.87     —     

Transaction costs disallowed

     —          0.21     0.52

Non-taxable income

     (0.04 %)      —          (45.03 %) 

Equity settled share based compensation

     0.03     0.22     0.29

Investment income not taxable

     (0.01 %)      (0.05 %)      (0.02 %) 

Deferred tax assets not recognised

     15.82     4.32     14.37

Non-deductible deemed dividend (S8F)

     —          3.02     —     

Securities Transfer Tax

     —          (0.63 %)      —     

Capital gains tax

     —          —          6.79

Effect of rate differences

     —          3.35     0.98
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Effective taxation rate

     16.12     (11.65 %)      3.72
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

35 OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR, NET OF INCOME TAX

 

Components of other comprehensive income:         

Foreign currency translation differences for foreign operations

     1,333,926         (2,088,318      (27,068,629
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income for the year, net of income tax

     1,333,926         (2,088,318      (27,068,629
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
Attributable to:         

Owners of the Company

     (3,343,642      (454,846      (613,130

Non-controlling interest*

     4,677,568         (1,633,472      (26,455,499
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     1,333,926         (2,088,318      (27,068,629
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

36 EARNINGS PER SHARE

The calculation of basic earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2015 was based on the loss attributable to owners of the Company of $167,068,900 (2014: loss of $24,609,398; 2013: loss of $199,492,438), and a weighted average number of common shares of 553,808,838 (2014: 541,956,940; 2013: 426,290,432).

At December 31, 2015 and 2014, share options were excluded in determining diluted weighted average number of common shares as all the options were significantly undervalued and were not exercised.

 

     2015      2014      2013  

Issued common shares at January 1

     554,288,473         201,888,473         201,888,473   

Effect of shares issued

     78,904         114,726,027         —     

Treasury shares

     (558,539      (2,057,560      (2,998,041

“B” Preference shares converted to common shares

     —           219,300,822         —     

Convertible “B” Preference shares - issued on July 1, 2009

     —           8,099,178         227,400,000   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Weighted average number of common shares at December 31

     553,808,838         541,956,940         426,290,432   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The basic loss per share for the year ended December 31, 2015 was 30 cents (2014: loss of 5 cents; 2013: earnings of 47 cents).

The calculation of diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2015 was based on the loss attributable to owners of the Company of $167,068,900 (2014: loss of $24,609,398; 2013: loss of $199,492,438), and a weighted average number of common shares of 553,808,838 (2014: 541,956,940; 2013: 429,288,473).

 

177


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

At December 31, 2015 share options were excluded in determining diluted weighted average number of common shares as all the options were significantly undervalued and were not exercised.

 

Issued common shares at January 1

     554,288,473         201,888,473         201,888,473   

Effect of shares issued

     78,904         114,726,027         —     

Treasury shares

     (558,539      (2,057,560      —     

“B” Preference shares converted to common shares

     —           219,300,822         —     

Convertible “B” Preference shares - issued on July 1, 2009

     —           8,099,178         227,400,000   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Weighted average number of common shares at December 31

     553,808,838         541,956,940         429,288,473   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The diluted loss per share for the year ended December 31, 2015 was 30 cents (2014: loss of 5 cents; 2013: earnings of 46 cents).

 

37 CASH GENERATED FROM/(UTILISED BY) OPERATIONS

 

     2015      2014      2013  

(Loss)/profit before income tax

     (439,877,681      (56,082,190      103,722,697   

Adjusted for:

        

Finance costs

     23,882,654         16,269,673         56,393,072   

Finance income

     (237,551      (296,995      (330,591

Non-cash items:

        

Depreciation and amortisation

     38,019,826         36,742,616         39,785,169   

Impairments of property, plant and equipment

     337,064,465         —           —     

Share-based compensation

     2,158,793         479,905         799,726   

Profit on disposal of property, plant and equipment

     —           (4,076      (170,402,784

Fair value on drawdowns and AG8 Adjustments

     314,840         2,123,936         (47,999,163

Balance due on sale of mineral properties

     —           —           3,103,227   

Rehabilitation adjustment

     2,368,031         491,405         (554,415

Restructure costs

     10,679,595         —           —     

Write-off of investment in subsidiaries

     417         1,047,935         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Cash (utilised by)/generated from operations before ESOP transactions

     (25,626,613      772,209         (15,483,062

ESOP cash transactions (restricted cash)

     85,542         70,106         307,614   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Cash (utilised by)/generated from operations before working capital changes

     (25,541,071      842,315         (15,175,448

Working capital changes

        

Decrease/(increase) in trade and other receivables (i)

     9,140,049         17,425,794         (32,914,115

(Decrease)/increase in trade and other payables (ii)

     (592,117      (29,876,350      56,906,061   

(Increase)/decrease in inventories (iii)

     (1,019,288      (360,550      307,756   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Cash generated (utilised by)/from operations

     (18,012,427      (11,968,791      9,124,254   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(i) Decrease/(increase) in trade and other receivables

 

     2015      2014      2013  

Opening balance

     16,256,784         33,782,099         3,272,400   

Closing balance

     (6,298,336      (16,256,784      (33,782,099
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Movement for the year

     9,958,448         17,525,315         (30,509,699

Effect of translation

     (818,399      (99,521      (2,404,416
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     9,140,049         17,425,794         (32,914,115
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

178


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

(ii) (Decrease)/increase in trade and other payables

 

Opening balance

     (41,670,800      (71,878,950      (20,888,631

Closing balance

     36,558,488         41,670,800         71,878,950   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Movement for the year

     (5,112,312      (30,208,150      50,990,319   

Effect of translation

     4,520,195         331,800         5,915,742   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     (592,117      (29,876,350      56,906,061   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(iii) (Increase)/decrease in inventories

 

Opening balance

     726,343         373,698         769,447   

Closing balance

     (1,553,872      (726,343      (373,698
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Movement for the year

     (827,529      (352,645      395,749   

Effect of translation

     (191,759      (7,905      (87,993
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     (1,019,288      (360,550      307,756   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

38 SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Group has two reportable segments as described below. These segments are managed separately based on the nature of operations. For each of the segments, the Group’s CEO (the Group’s chief operating decision maker) reviews internal management reports monthly. The following summary describes the operations in each of the Group’s reportable segments:

 

    Bokoni Mine - Mining of PGM’s.

 

    Projects - Mining exploration in Kwanda exploration projects. Please refer to Note 12 for the sale of mineral rights.

The majority of operations and functions are performed in South Africa. An insignificant portion of administrative functions are performed in the Company’s country of domicile.

The CEO considers earnings before net finance costs, income tax expense, depreciation and amortisation (“EBITDA”) to be an appropriate measure of each segment’s performance. Accordingly, the EBITDA for each segment has been included. All external revenue is generated by the Bokoni Mine segment.

 

     December 31, 2015     December 31, 2014
     Bokoni Mine     Projects      Total     Bokoni Mine     Projects     Total     Note

Revenue

     205,690,922        —           205,690,922        237,390,814        —          237,390,814     

Cost of sales

     (257,810,562     —           (257,810,562     (263,620,401     —          (263,620,401   (i)

Impairment loss

     (351,695,167     —           (351,695,167     —          —          —        (ii)

EBITDA

     (390,248,096     —           (390,248,096     1,975,419        (20,169     1,955,250      (iii)

(Loss)/profit before income tax

     (430,328,407     —           (430,328,407     (35,897,142     (5,751     (35,902,893   (iv)

Income tax expense

     —          —           —          —          —          —        (v)

Depreciation and amortisation

     (35,251,680     —           (35,251,680     (35,639,205     —          (35,639,205   (vi)

Finance income

     230,082        —           230,082        271,001        —          271,001      (vii)

Finance costs

     (5,058,712     —           (5,058,712     (2,504,358     —          (2,504,358   (viii)

Total assets

     320,862,265        3,586         320,865,851        734,753,789        3,038,554        737,792,343      (ix)

Additions to non-current assets

     25,684,322        —           25,684,322        35,067,670        —          35,067,670      (x)

Total liabilities

     95,711,611        31,872         95,743,483        (57,325,100     (981,997     (58,307,097   (xi)

Reconciliations of reportable segment cost of sales, EBITDA, profit or loss before income tax, income tax expense, depreciation, finance income, finance costs, assets, addition to non-current assets and liabilities:

 

     2015      2014      2013  

(i) Cost of sales

        

Total cost of sales for reportable segments

     (257,810,562      (263,620,401      (234,860,426

Corporate and consolidation adjustments

     (2,763,648      (1,137,801      1,084,128   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

179


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Consolidated cost of sales

     (260,574,210      (264,758,202      (233,776,298
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

(ii) Impairment loss

        

Total cost of sales for reportable segments

     (351,695,167      —           —     

Corporate and consolidation adjustments

     14,630,702         —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Consolidated cost of sales

     (337,064,465      —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

(iii) EBITDA

        

Total EBITDA for reportable segments

     (390,248,096      1,955,250         99,153,458   

Net finance costs

     (4,828,631      (2,233,356      (25,449,376

Depreciation and amortisation

     (35,251,680      (35,639,205      (39,949,245

Corporate and consolidation adjustments

     (9,549,274      (20,164,879      69,967,860   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Consolidated (loss)/profit before income tax

     (439,877,681      (56,082,190      103,722,697   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

(iv) (Loss)/profit before income tax

        

(Loss)/profit before tax for reportable segments

     (430,328,407      (35,902,893      35,034,227   

Corporate and consolidation adjustments

     (9,549,274      (20,179,297      68,688,470   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Consolidated (loss)/profit before income tax

     (439,877,681      (56,082,190      103,722,697   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

(v) Income tax expense

        

Income tax expense for reportable segments

     —           —           6,903,122   

Corporate and consolidation adjustments

     70,895,943         6,532,348         (3,049,702
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Consolidated income tax expense

     70,895,943         6,532,348         3,853,420   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

(vi) Depreciation and amortisation

        
     2015      2014      2013  

Depreciation and amortisation for reportable segments

     (35,251,680      (35,639,205      (38,949,245

Corporate and consolidation adjustments

     (2,768,146      (1,103,411      (835,924
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Consolidated depreciation and amortisation

     (38,019,826      (36,742,616      (39,785,169
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

(vii) Finance income

        

Finance income for reportable segments

     230,082         271,001         279,389   

Corporate and consolidation adjustments

     7,469         25,994         51,202   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Consolidated finance income

     237,551         296,995         330,591   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

(viii) Finance costs

        

Finance costs for reportable segments

     (5,058,712      (2,504,358      (25,449,376

Corporate and consolidation adjustments

     (18,823,942      (13,765,315      (30,943,696
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Consolidated finance costs

     (23,882,654      (16,269,673      (56,393,072
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

(ix) Total assets

        

Assets for reportable segments

     320,865,851         737,792,343         766,906,453   

Corporate and consolidation adjustments

     5,521,671         (16,967,732      6,722,956   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Consolidated assets

     326,387,522         720,824,611         773,629,409   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

180


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

(x) Additions to non-current assets

        

Additions to non-current assets for reportable segments

     25,684,322         35,067,670         51,265,558   

Corporate and consolidation adjustments

     6,005         1,335         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Consolidated additions to non-current assets

     25,690,327         35,069,005         51,265,558   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

(xi) Total liabilities

        

Liabilities for reportable segments

     (95,743,483      (58,307,097      (101,809,455

Corporate and consolidation adjustments

     (178,093,342      (247,311,439      (292,705,976
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Consolidated liabilities

     (273,836,825      (305,618,536      (394,515,431
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

39 SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS

 

39.1 Equity-settled

 

39.1.1 Stock options

The Group has a share option plan approved by the shareholders that allows it to grant options, subject to regulatory terms and approval, to its directors, employees, officers, and consultants to acquire up to 55,442,181 (2014: 55,428,847) common shares. As at December 31, 2015, 8,962,047 options were outstanding and 8,579,030 options remained available to be granted. The exercise price of each option is set by the Board of Directors at the time of grant but cannot be less than the market price (less permissible discounts) on the TSX. Options have a term of up to a maximum of ten years (however, the Company has historically granted options for up to a term of five years), and terminate 30 to 90 days following the termination of the optionee’s employment or term of engagement, except in the case of retirement or death. Vesting of options is at the discretion of the Board of Directors at the time the options are granted. The continuity of share purchase options is as follows:

 

     Weighted average
exercise price
     Number of options      Contractual weighted
average remaining
life (years)
 

Balance – December 31, 2013

   $ 0.93         5,110,000         2.24   

Granted

   $ 0.39         5,142,882      

Exercised

     —           —        

Cancelled

     —           —        

Expired

   $ 0.96         (550,000   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance – December 31, 2014

   $ 0.64         9,702,882         6.03   

Granted

     —           —        

Exercised

     —           —        

Cancelled

   $ 0.42         (740,835   

Expired

     —           —        
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance – December 31, 2015

   $ 0.66         8,962,047         4.78   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2015 were as follows:

 

Expiry date

   Option price      Number of
options
outstanding
     Number of
options vested
     Weighted
average life
(years)
 

November 30, 2016

   $ 0.84         4,010,000         4,010,000         0.92   

May 1, 2017

   $ 1.61         500,000         500,000         1.33   

August 19, 2024

   $ 0.39         4,452,047         2,274,919         8.64   
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total

        8,962,047         6,784,919      
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

Weighted average exercise price

      $ 0.66         $ 0.66      

 

181


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

The exercise prices of all share purchase options granted during the year were equal to or greater than the market price at the grant date. Using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the assumptions noted below, the estimated fair value of all options granted have been reflected in the statement of changes in equity.

The share-based payments expense recognised during the year ended December 31, 2015 was $310,132 (2014: $370,891; 2013: $21,783). The assumptions used to estimate the fair value of options granted during the year were:

 

     2015      2014      2013  

Risk- free interest rate

     6.10% - 7.86%         6.10% – 7.86%         2.8%   

Option term

     0.5 – 8 years         0. 5 - 8 years         5 – 7 years   

Volatility

     60%         60%         83%   

Forfeiture rate

     0%         0%         0%   

Expected dividends

     Nil         Nil         Nil   

The volatility of the shares was calculated over the expected life of the option. Volatility was calculated by using available historical information on the share price for Atlatsa equal to the expected life of the scheme.

The risk free rate for periods within the contractual term of the share right is based on the Government of Canada benchmark bond yield.

 

39.1.2 Conditional Share Units – Plateau (“CSUs”)

On August 20, 2014, the Company awarded 9,004,500 CSUs to eligible employees of Plateau entitling the applicable employee to one common share of the Company on the vesting date. These CSUs will vest on December 31, 2016 after the Company’s Average Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) for the 2014, 2015 and 2016 years are assessed when compared to five specified peer comparator companies. On May 28, 2015, the Company awarded 26,274,800 CSUs to eligible employees of Plateau entitling the applicable employee to one common share of the Company on the vesting date. These CSUs will vest on December 31, 2017 after the Company’s TSR for the 2015, 2016 and 2017 years are assessed when compared to five specified peer comparator companies.

The CSUs will vest based on the following ranking in relation to the TSR:

 

Ranking of Atlatsa to peer comparator companies

     % of shares to vest   

First

     100   

Second

     90   

Third

     60   

Fourth

     40   

Fifth or below

     0   

The Monte Carlo simulation was used to simulate the future share prices by applying Geometric Brownian motion, dividends and expected vesting percentages. The performance of Atlatsa and the peer comparator companies was done at each entity’s reporting date. The final value of the schemes was calculated as the expected share price on December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017 respectively, multiplied by the expected vesting percentage, plus expected dividends (or the dividends converted to the appropriate number of additional shares) during the vesting period, discounted to the valuation date (August 20, 2014 and May 28, 2015). The inputs and assumptions used in the valuation are described below:

 

     2015      2014      2013  

Share price at grant date

     ZAR1.45         ZAR3.60         —     

Expected vesting percentage

     33.94%         24%         —     

Volatility

     29% - 85%         25% - 60%         —     

Risk-free interest rate (NACC)

     5.94% - 7.20%         6.09% - 6.68%         —     

Expected dividend and dividend yield

     0.00% - 1.77%         0.00% - 2.72%         —     

Correlation

     (5%) – 100%         (1%) - 100%         —     

The share-based payment expense recognised during the period was $1,653,341 (2014: $0).

 

39.1.3 Share Appreciation Rights – Plateau (“SARs”)

The Group currently has a scheme in place to award SARs to recognise the contributions of senior staff to the Group’s financial position and performance and to retain key employees. These SARs are linked to the share price of the Group on the JSE and are not settled in cash on the

 

182


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

exercise date. On May 28, 2015, the Company awarded 2,887,070 SARs to eligible employees of Plateau.

The 5 day volume weighted share price as at vesting date of December 31, 2017, shall have increased from grant date to the vesting date by a percentage that exceeds the movement in the consumer price index (“CPI”) over the same period. Should the vesting condition be met, all the SARs will vest.

For the Atlatsa SARs, the Black-Scholes option pricing model was used to value the share units, this is since the vesting and the vesting date and expiry date are on the same date. The SARs do not entitle the participant to any rights with respect to voting or dividends.

The assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the SARS granted during the year were:

 

     2015      2014      2013  

South African risk-free rate

     5.94% - 7.20%         —           —     

CPI on grant date

     111.41         —           —     

CPI on vesting date

     131.27         —           —     

Increase in CPI

     117.82%         —           —     

Volatility

     85%         —           —     

VWAP

     ZAR1.45         —           —     

Expected dividends

     Nil         —           —     

The volatility of the shares was calculated with the equally weighted standard approach of calculating volatility by using available historical information on the share price for Atlatsa equal to the term to maturity of the scheme.

The risk free rates were obtained from the bootstrapped zero coupon perfect fit swap curve as at December 31, 2015, sourced from the Bond Exchange of South Africa.

The following CPI linked bonds traded on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (“JSE”) were used to forecast CPI on the valuation date: R189, R197, R202, R210 and R211.

The share-based payment expense recognised during the period was $52,873 (2014: $0).

 

39.1.4 Restricted Share Units - Plateau (“RSUs”)

On November 06, 2014, the Company awarded 133,333 RSUs to eligible employees of Plateau entitling the applicable employee to one common share of the Company on the vesting date for each unit held. These RSUs vested on May 31, 2015.

The share-based expense recognised during the period was $21,590 (2014: $9,358).

 

39.1.5 Bokoni Platinum Mine ESOP trust

Prior to the acquisition of Bokoni on July 1, 2009, certain employees of Bokoni were part of the Anglo Group Employee Empowerment Scheme (“Kotula Scheme”). When Atlatsa acquired Bokoni, Anglo Platinum and Atlatsa replaced the Kotula Scheme with the Bokoni Platinum Mine ESOP Trust (“ESOP Trust”), which has similar participation benefits to the Kotula Scheme.

The purpose of the ESOP Trust scheme is to incentivize and retain employees, promote BEE and increase broad-based and effective participation in the equity of Atlatsa by historically disadvantaged persons. The ESOP Trust holds and utilises ordinary shares in Atlatsa (refer note 19) for the benefit of the beneficiaries.

Any units that the employees held in the Kotula Scheme were exchanged into units in the ESOP Trust at a ratio of 15 units in the ESOP Trust for every Kotula unit held. The remaining units in the ESOP Trust are allocated to the employees in five equal annual installments beginning March 31, 2010 and for the next four years thereafter. Employees received an equal allocation of units. Any units held by a beneficiary that are forfeited shall be added back to the number of unallocated units available for future allocation.

The ESOP Trust shall dispose of the shares held in Atlatsa to the beneficiaries as follows:

 

    One third vested in proportion to the beneficiaries units on May 16, 2013;

 

    Half of the remaining balance of ordinary shares will vest in proportion to their interest on May 16, 2014; and

 

183


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

    The remaining balance of ordinary shares will vest in proportion to their interest on May 16, 2015.

The trustees (acting as agent on behalf of the beneficiaries) shall dispose of and sell as many shares as will be necessary to settle all taxes payable by the beneficiaries. The beneficiaries may also direct the trustees to sell the distribution shares on behalf of the beneficiaries and the proceeds of such sale, net of all expenses, shall be distributed to the beneficiaries.

If a beneficiary’s employment is terminated due to death, retrenchment, retirement, disability or ill-health, Bokoni will pay a cash amount equal to the fair value of the beneficiary’s units to the beneficiary who will then cease to be a beneficiary of the ESOP Trust. The units will be transferred to Bokoni who will become a beneficiary of the ESOP Trust. Where the beneficiary’s employment is terminated prior to the termination date for any other reason, the beneficiary shall forfeit all his rights under the scheme. The forfeited units will be added back to the number of unallocated units for future allocation.

At December 31, the following units were allocated:

 

     2015      2014      2013  

Total units available for allocation

     70,000,000         70,000,000         70,000,000   

Allocation July 1, 2009

     (20,078,634      (20,078,634      (20,078,634

Allocation March 31, 2010

     (10,282,759      (10,282,759      (10,282,759

Allocation March 31, 2011

     (10,666,586      (10,666,586      (10,666,586

Allocation March 31, 2012

     (11,081,905      (11,081,905      (11,081,905

Allocation March 31, 2013

     (11,081,905      (11,081,905      (11,081,905

Allocation March 31, 2014*

     (6,808,211      (12,444,929      —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total units available for allocation at December 31, 2015

     —           (5,636,718      6,808,211   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

* The over allocation in 2014 was due to units forfeited being re-allocated again.

 

184


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Units forfeited

     277,759        819,158        1,378,332   

South African risk free rate

     7.95     7.95     6.4

Forfeiture rate

     5.0     5.0     5

Expected dividends

     Nil        Nil        Nil   

Exercise price

     Nil        Nil        Nil   

Share price at grant date (ZAR)

     N/A        5.05        8.00   

The share-based payment expense recognised during the year ended December 31, 2015 was $120,857 (2014: $99,656;

2013: $955,704).

On May 16, 2015 all ordinary distribution shares vested. The ESOP trustees agreed to purchase the distribution shares of all active employees as at June 12, 2015 at a share price of ZAR2,65 per share. That represented a 54% premium to the current market price. A total pre-tax amount of ZAR12.0 million was distributed to beneficiaries. The shares remain in the custody of the ESOP trust.

Atlatsa recognises the value added by employee beneficiaries at Bokoni Mine and has agreed that it is in the best interest of the mine and its stakeholders for employees to remain as long term shareholders of Bokoni mine. It has been agreed that Bokoni Mine will establish a special purpose trust for the future benefit of Bokoni Mine employees. The shares in custody will be transferred to the special purpose trust. As at December 31, 2015 the special purpose trust had not yet been formed.

 

39.2 Cash-settled

 

39.2.1 Share Appreciation Rights – Bokoni Platinum Mine (“SARs”)

The Group currently has a scheme in place to award SARs to recognise the contributions of senior staff to the Group’s financial position and performance and to retain key employees. These SARs are linked to the share price of the Group on the JSE and are settled in cash on the exercise date.

A third of the SARs granted are exercisable annually from the grant date with an expiry date of 4 years from the grant date for senior management and 5 years for lower and middle management. The offer price of these SARs equaled the closing market price of the underlying shares on the trading date immediately preceding the granting of the SARs.

 

Vested shares

     12,041,118         6,266,993         1,647,770   

Share appreciation rights granted

     56,940,429         21,851,994         15,166,658   

Vesting year of unvested share appreciation rights:

 

Within one year

     10,249,944         8,187,001         5,558,728   

One to two years

     10,329,567         3,774,000         7,048,597   

Two to three years

     24,319,800         3,624,000         2,559,333   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total number of shares unvested

     44,899,311         15,585,001         15,166,658   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The movement, recognised in profit and loss, for the SARs provision is calculated as an income for the year ended December 31, 2015 of $919,021 (2014: $2,189,849 expense, 2013: $4,188,348 income).

The assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the SARS granted during the year were:

 

     2015      2014      2013

South African risk-free rate

     6.38% - 8.63%         5.95% - 7.32%       5.0% - 7.3%

Volatility

     70%         65%       88% - 113%

 

185


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Share Price

     ZAR0.49         ZAR2.30         ZAR5.73   

Weighted average exercise price

     ZAR1.16         ZAR1.49         ZAR1.93   

Forfeiture rate

     0%         0%         0%   

Expected dividends

     Nil         Nil         Nil   

The only vesting condition for the scheme is that the employees should be in the employment of the Group at the time of vesting.

The volatility of the shares was calculated with the equally weighted standard approach of calculating volatility by using available historical information on the share price for Atlatsa equal to the term to maturity of the scheme.

The risk free rates were obtained from the bootstrapped zero coupon perfect fit swap curve as at December 31, 2015, sourced from the Bond Exchange of South Africa.

 

40 CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Deep Groundwater Pollution

Bokoni Mine has identified a future pollution risk posed by deep groundwater in certain underground shafts. Various studies have been undertaken by the mine since 2012. In view of the documentation of current information for the accurate estimation of the liability, we are unable to quantify the extent of either the existence or extent of pollution or its source, if any. As such the criteria in IAS 37 for recognizing a liability have not been met.

Litigation claims

There are pending litigation claims at year end to which Bokoni Mine is a defendant. The possible obligation amounts to $481,135.

 

41 RELATED PARTIES

Relationships

 

Related party

  

Nature of relationship

RPM    The Group concluded a number of shared services agreements between Bokoni and RPM, a wholly owned subsidiary of Anglo Platinum and a 49% shareholder in Bokoni Holdco. Pursuant to the terms of various shared services agreements, the Anglo Platinum group of companies will continue to provide certain services to Bokoni at a cost that is no greater than the costs charged to any other Anglo Platinum group company for the same or similar services. It is anticipated that, as Atlatsa builds its internal capacity, and makes the transformation to a fully operational PGM producer, these services will be phased out and replaced either with internal services or third party services. RPM also provides debt funding to the Group and purchases all of the Group’s PGM concentrate.
Atlatsa Holdings    Atlatsa Holdings is the Company’s controlling shareholder.
Key management    All directors directly involved in the Atlatsa Group and certain members of top management at Bokoni and Plateau.

Related party balances

 

          2015      2014  

RPM

   Loans and borrowings (refer note 20)      (172,790,360      (130,402,292
   Trade and other payables      (14,536,337      (16,493,972
   Trade and other receivables      2,594,530         12,636,881   

Related party transactions

 

186


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

RPM

   Revenue (refer note 26 )      205,690,922         (237,390,814
   Finance expense (before interest capitalised)      23,115,604         18,210,163   
   Administration expenses      8,086930         5,030,864   
   Purchases      38,775,936         49,097,952   
   Costs capitalised to capital work-in-progress      4,770,046         7,974,873   

Key Management Compensation

 

     2015      2014      2013  

Remuneration for executive directors and key management

        

-     Salaries

     3,447,281         3,330,699         3,414,860   

-     Short-term benefits

     1,217,170         2,365,772         1,655,880   

-     Share options

     —           —           21,783   

-     Share-based payments

     21,590         23,216         837,758   

-     Remuneration for non-executives

     334,997         444,665         348,408   

-     Retrenchment costs

     54,461         —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total key management compensation

     5,075,499         6,164,352         6,278,689   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

42 COMMITMENTS

 

     2015      2014  

Contracted for

     5,811,870         6,478,886   

Not yet contracted for

     4,755,473         4,959,265   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Authorised capital expenditure

     10,567,343         11,438,151   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The committed expenditures relate to property, plant and equipment and will be funded through cash generated from operations and available loan facilities.

 

43 EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING DATE

There were no events of a material nature that have occurred between the reporting date and the date of this report.

 

44 EMPLOYEE COSTS

Employee costs included in profit/(loss) for the year are as follows:

 

     2015      2014      2013  

Salaries and wages and other benefits

     102,991,364         101,276,362         91,766,785   

Retirement benefit costs

     370,995         334,483         315,949   

Medical aid contributions

     12,881         13,664         12,939   

Employment termination cost

     4,246,124         —           —     

Share-based payments – equity-settled

     120,857         99,656         799,056   

Share-based payments – cash-settled

     808,782         (2,180,491      837,758   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total employee costs

     108,551,003         99,543,674         93,732,487   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

45 GROUP ENTITIES

The following are the shareholdings of the Company in the various group entities:

 

Company

  

Country of
Incorporation

   2015     2014  

N1C Resources Incorporation

   Cayman Islands      100     100

N2C Resources Incorporation *

   Cayman Islands      100     100

 

187


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited *

   South Africa                  100     100

Bokoni Holdings Proprietary Limited *

   South Africa      51     51

Bokoni Mine Proprietary Limited *

   South Africa      51     51

Boikgantsho Proprietary Limited *

   South Africa      51     51

Kwanda Proprietary Limited *

   South Africa      51     51

Ga-Phasha Proprietary Limited *

   South Africa      51     51

Lebowa Platinum Mine Limited * #

   South Africa      51     51

The following are the structured entities in the group:

 

Bokoni Platinum Mine ESOP trust**

   South Africa        Consolidated  structured entity     Consolidated     structured entity    

Bokoni Rehabilitation Trust***

   South Africa        Consolidated  structured entity     Consolidated     structured entity    

Bokoni Platinum Mine Community Trust****

   South Africa        Unconsolidated  structured entity     Unconsolidated     structured entity    

 

* Indirectly held.
# These entities are dormant.
** The Atlatsa group provided the funding through Bokoni Mine to construct the trust and purchase shares in Atlatsa, but is not required to provide any further financial support to this entity. The purpose of the Trust is to facilitate a share-based payment arrangement on behalf of the group. Atlatsa has the right to appoint one trustee, who has the right to reject any decision made by the other trustees. Atlatsa therefore has power of the trust.
*** Atlatsa Group has power over the trust, as the sole trustee is a director of Atlatsa. All the cash resources kept by the trust is on behalf of Atlatsa, to be later utilised against any rehabilitation and decommissioning incurred.
**** As per the requirements of IFRS 10, we have considered the purpose and objective of the trust, and the Group has concluded that the power over the investee, exposure or rights to variable returns and the ability to use its power over the investee to affect the amount of the investor’s return does not reside with Atlatsa. This is due to Atlatsa having the right to appoint one trustee of the trust, but do not have the deciding vote, Atlatsa has no interest in/or power over the operations of the trust. The Atlatsa group is also not required to provide any financial support to the trust.

 

46 NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST

The only non-controlling interest is the 49% shareholding of RPM in Bokoni Holdco (please refer to organogram). Bokoni Holdco owns the Group’s various mineral property interests and operations are conducted in the Republic of South Africa in the Bushveld Complex.

 

Non-controlling interest roll forward    Note    2015      2014  

Balance beginning of year

        184,133,904         198,227,542   

Acquisition of shares in Bokoni Platinum Holdings (Pty) Ltd

   28      2,833,641         12,480,278   

Loss for the year

        (201,912,838      (24,940,444

Total other comprehensive income for the year

   35      4,677,568         (1,633,472
     

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

        (10,267,725      184,133,904   
     

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following is summarised financial information for the Bokoni Holdco subgroup, prepared in accordance with IFRS.

 

Non-current assets

     447,318,399         957,013,938   

Current assets

     11,666,534         25,194,819   

Non-current liabilities

     (13,769,756      (13,641,146

Current liabilities

     (81,976,291      (43,722,494
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net assets

     (363,238,886      924,845,117   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Revenue

     205,690,922         237,390,814   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

188


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Total comprehensive income (*)

     (435,665,912      (50,898,865
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Cash flows from operating activities

     (20,623,357      (9,208,777

Cash flows from investment activities

     (25,985,639      (34,979,248

Cash flows from financing activities

     42,699,462         12,634,923   

Effect of translation

     429,465         433,507   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

     (3,480,069      (31,119,595
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

* As Bokoni Holdco has no other comprehensive income, total comprehensive income is therefore equal to the loss for the year.

 

189


Table of Contents

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

GROUP ORGANOGRAM

 

LOGO

 

* Black Economic Empowerment.
** ESOP Trust is consolidated into the Company.
# Dormant from December 13, 2013.
^ Bokoni Rehabilitation Trust is consolidated into Bokoni.

 

190


Table of Contents

 

ITEM 19 EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report:

 

Number

  

Document

  1.    Articles of the Company. (1)
  4.01    Joint Venture Agreement between PPL and Plateau dated November 25, 2003. (2)
  4.02    Share Exchange Agreement between Pelawan and Atlatsa dated January 21, 2004. (2)
  4.03    Shareholders Agreement between Pelawan, Atlatsa and the Pelawan Trust made as of September 19, 2004. (3)
  4.04    Term Loan Agreement between Rustenburg Mines Limited and Plateau Resources (Pty) Limited signed on October 31, 2006. (4)
  4.05    The Settlement Agreement between Pelawan, Atlatsa and the Pelawan Trust made as of December 28, 2006. (4)
  4.06    Amending Agreement between Pelawan, Atlatsa and the Pelawan Trust, dated as of December 20, 2007. (6)
  4.07    Sale of Concentrate Agreement between RPM and Bokoni Mine, dated December 21, 2007. (6)
  4.09    Phase 3 Implementation Agreement between RPM, Plateau and Holdco dated March 28, 2008, as amended on May 13, 2009. (6)
  4.10    Holdco Sale of Shares Agreement amongst Plateau, RPM and Anglo Platinum, dated March 28, 2008, as amended on May 13, 2009. (6)
  4.11    Sale of Rights Agreement amongst RPM, Plateau and Boikgantsho Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited, dated March 28, 2008, as amended on May 13, 2009. (6)
  4.12    Sale of Rights Agreement amongst RPM, Plateau and Kwanda Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited (formerly Richtrau No. 207 Proprietary Limited), dated March 28, 2008, as amended on May 13, 2009. (6)
  4.13    Holdco Shareholders Agreement among Plateau Resources and Rustenburg Platinum Mines and Richtrau 179 Proprietary Ltd dated March 28, 2008. (6)
  4.14    Umbrella Services Agreement amongst Anglo Platinum, Atlatsa and Holdco, dated March 28, 2008. (6)
  4.15    Term Loan Agreement between Rustenburg Mines Limited and Plateau Resources (Pty) Limited signed on November 23, 2008. (6)
  4.16    Atlatsa Shareholders Agreement among Atlatsa Resources Corporation and Pelawan Investments and the Pelawan Trust dated June 12, 2009. (6)
  4.17    Exchange Agreement among Atlatsa, Plateau and Central Plaza Investments 78 (Pty) (to be renamed Pelawan Finance SPV (Pty) Limited) dated June 12, 2009. (6)
  4.18    Global Intercreditor Agreement between Atlatsa, Plateau, Micawber 634 (Pty) Limited and Micawber 603 (Pty) Limited, Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Standard Chartered Bank and Tumelo Motsisi and Harold Motaung on behalf of the Pelawan Dividend Trust dated June 12, 2009. (6)

 

191


Table of Contents
  4.19    Senior Term Loan Facilities Agreement dated June 12, 2009 between Plateau, Standard Chartered Bank and Micawber 634 (Pty) Limited. (6)
  4.20    Standby Loan Facility Agreement between Plateau and Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited dated June 12, 2009. (6)
  4.21    RPM Funding Loan Agreement between Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited and Holdco dated June 12, 2009. (6)
  4.22    RPM Plateau A Preference Share Subscription Agreement between Plateau, N2C Resources Inc. and Rustenburg Platinum Mines dated June 12, 2009. (6)
  4.23    Plateau Funding Loan Agreement between Plateau and Holdco dated June 12, 2009. (6)
  4.24    Operating Cash Flow Shortfall Loan Facility Agreement between Plateau and Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited dated June 12, 2009. (6)
  4.25    Opco Funding Loan Agreement between Holdco and Richtrau No. 177 (Pty) Limited dated June 12, 2009. (6)
  4.26    Conversion Implementation Agreement between the Pelawan Trust, Central Plaza Investments 78 (Pty) (to be remained Pelawan Finance SPV (Pty) Limited), Pelawan Investments (Pty) Ltd, Atlatsa, Plateau and Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited dated June 26, 2009. (6)
  4.27    RPM Funding Common Terms Agreement between, inter alia, Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Plateau, Central Plaza Investments 78 (Pty) Limited and Atlatsa dated June 12, 2009. (6)
  4.28    Amendment Agreement among Atlatsa Resources Corporation, N1C Resources Inc., N2C Resources Inc., Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Holdings Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited, Micawber 634 (RF) Proprietary Limited, Micawber 603 (RF) Proprietary Limited, Pelawan Finance SPV Proprietary Limited, the Trustees for the time being of the Pelawan Trust and the trustees for the time being of the Pelawan Dividend Trust dated May 28, 2013. (8)
  4.29    Amended and Restated Transaction Framework Agreement between Atlatsa Resources Corporation, Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Holdings Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited, Atlatsa Holdings Proprietary Limited Pelawan Finance SPV Proprietary Limited, the Trustees for the time being of the Pelawan Trust and the trustees for the time being of the Pelawan Dividend Trust dated December 12, 2013. (9)
  4.30    Amended and Restated Sale of Assets Agreement between Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited and Boikgantsho Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited dated November 15, 2013. (9)
  4.31    Amended and Restated Sale of a Portion of a Mining Right Agreement between RPM and Ga-Phasha Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited dated November 15, 2013. (9)
  4.32    Amended and Restated Global Intercreditor Agreement among Atlatsa, Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited, Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Micawber 634 (RF) Proprietary Limited, Micawber 603 (RF) Proprietary Limited, Pelawan Finance SPV Proprietary Limited, Tumelo Motsisi and Ansa Chris Harold Motaung dated March 27, 2013. (9)
  4.33    Amended and Restated Holdco Shareholders’ Agreement between Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited, Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited and Bokoni Platinum Holdings Proprietary Limited dated March 27, 2013. (9)

 

192


Table of Contents
  4.34    Implementation Agreement between Atlatsa Resources Corporation, Camipath Proprietary Limited, N1C Resources Inc., N2C Resources Inc., Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Holdings Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited, Ga-Phasha Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited, Boikgantsho Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited, Micawber 634 (RF) Proprietary Limited, Micawber 603 (RF) Proprietary Limited, Pelawan Investments Proprietary Limited, the Trustees for the time being of the Pelawan Trust and the trustees for the time being of the Pelawan Dividend Trust dated March 27, 2013. (9)
  4.35    RPM Funding Common Terms Agreement between Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited, Pelawan Finance SPV Proprietary Limited, Atlatsa Resources Corporation and certain others dated March 27, 2013.  (9)
  4.36    Amended and Restated Subscription Agreement between Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited and Atlatsa Resources Corporation dated November 15, 2013. (9)
  4.37    Senior Term Loan and Revolving Facilities Agreement between Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited, Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Micawber 634 (RF) Proprietary Limited and Micawber 603 (RF) Proprietary Limited dated March 27, 2013. (9)
  4.38    Amended and Restated Transaction Framework Agreement between Atlatsa Resources Corporation, Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Holdings Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited, Atlatsa Holdings Proprietary Limited Pelawan Finance SPV Proprietary Limited, the Trustees for the time being of the Pelawan Trust and the trustees for the time being of the Pelawan Dividend Trust dated December 12, 2013. (9)
  4.39    Working Capital Facility Agreement between Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited and Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited dated March 27, 2013. (9)
  4.40    Amendment and Interim Implementation Agreement between Atlatsa Resources Corporation, N1C Resources Inc., N2C Resources Inc., Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Holdings Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited, Micawber 634 (RF) Proprietary Limited, Micawber 603 (RF) Proprietary Limited, Pelawan Finance SPV Proprietary Limited, the Trustees for the time being of the Pelawan Trust and the trustees for the time being of the Pelawan Dividend Trust dated September 26, 2012. (9)
  4.41    First Amendment And Restatement Agreement To The Senior Facilities Agreement between Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited, N2C Resources Inc., N1C Resources Inc., Bokoni Platinum Holdings Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Mines Proprietary Limited, Atlatsa Resources Corporation, Micawber 603 Proprietary Limited, Micawber 634 Proprietary Limited relating to the Amended and Restated Senior Facilities Agreement dated December 9, 2015. *
  4.42    Facility Agreement – R334 000 000 Term Loan Facility provided by Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited as Lender and Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited as Borrower dated December 9, 2015. *
  4.43    First Amendment and Restated Agreement to the Working Capital Facility Agreement between Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited as Lender and Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited as Borrower and Bokoni Platinum Holdings Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Mines Proprietary Limited, Atlatsa Resources Corporation dated May 21, 2015. *
  8.1    List of Subsidiaries. (7)
11.1    Code of Ethics. (2)

 

193


Table of Contents
12.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
12.2    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
13.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
15.1    Corporate Governance Policies and Procedures Manual issued as of November 22, 2007. (5)
15.2    Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. (10)

 

Notes:

 

* Filed herewith
(1) Incorporated by reference to Atlatsa’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended October 31, 2000.
(2) Incorporated by reference to Atlatsa’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended October 31, 2003.
(3) Incorporated by reference to Atlatsa’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004.
(4) Incorporated by reference to Atlatsa’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006.
(6) Incorporated by reference to Atlatsa’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008.
(7) Incorporated by reference to Atlatsa’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010.
(8) Incorporated by reference to Atlatsa’s report on Form 6-K, furnished to the Commission on September 20, 2013.
(9) Incorporated by reference to Atlatsa’s report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014.
(10) Incorporated by reference to Atlatsa’s report on Form 6-K, furnished to the Commission on March 30, 2016.

 

194


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

The Registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this Annual Report on its behalf.

 

    ATLATSA RESOURCES CORPORATION
DATED: March 30, 2016     By:  

/s/ Boipelo Lekubo

      Boipelo Lekubo
      Chief Financial Officer

 

195


Table of Contents

 

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

 

  1.    Articles of the Company. (1)
  4.01    Joint Venture Agreement between PPL and Plateau dated November 25, 2003. (2)
  4.02    Share Exchange Agreement between Pelawan and Atlatsa dated January 21, 2004. (2)
  4.03    Shareholders Agreement between Pelawan, Atlatsa and the Pelawan Trust made as of September 19, 2004. (3)
  4.04    Term Loan Agreement between Rustenburg Mines Limited and Plateau Resources (Pty) Limited signed on October 31, 2006. (4)
  4.05    The Settlement Agreement between Pelawan, Atlatsa and the Pelawan Trust made as of December 28, 2006. (4)
  4.06    Amending Agreement between Pelawan, Atlatsa and the Pelawan Trust, dated as of December 20, 2007. (6)
  4.07    Sale of Concentrate Agreement between RPM and Bokoni Mine, dated December 21, 2007. (6)
  4.09    Phase 3 Implementation Agreement between RPM, Plateau and Holdco dated March 28, 2008, as amended on May 13, 2009.  (6)
  4.10    Holdco Sale of Shares Agreement amongst Plateau, RPM and Anglo Platinum, dated March 28, 2008, as amended on May 13, 2009. (6)
  4.11    Sale of Rights Agreement amongst RPM, Plateau and Boikgantsho Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited, dated March 28, 2008, as amended on May 13, 2009. (6)
  4.12    Sale of Rights Agreement amongst RPM, Plateau and Kwanda Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited (formerly Richtrau No. 207 Proprietary Limited), dated March 28, 2008, as amended on May 13, 2009. (6)
  4.13    Holdco Shareholders Agreement among Plateau Resources and Rustenburg Platinum Mines and Richtrau 179 Proprietary Ltd dated March 28, 2008. (6)
  4.14    Umbrella Services Agreement amongst Anglo Platinum, Atlatsa and Holdco, dated March 28, 2008. (6)
  4.15    Term Loan Agreement between Rustenburg Mines Limited and Plateau Resources (Pty) Limited signed on November 23, 2008. (6)
  4.16    Atlatsa Shareholders Agreement among Atlatsa Resources Corporation and Pelawan Investments and the Pelawan Trust dated June 12, 2009. (6)
  4.17    Exchange Agreement among Atlatsa, Plateau and Central Plaza Investments 78 (Pty) (to be renamed Pelawan Finance SPV (Pty) Limited) dated June 12, 2009. (6)
  4.18    Global Intercreditor Agreement between Atlatsa, Plateau, Micawber 634 (Pty) Limited and Micawber 603 (Pty) Limited, Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Standard Chartered Bank and Tumelo Motsisi and Harold Motaung on behalf of the Pelawan Dividend Trust dated June 12, 2009. (6)
  4.19    Senior Term Loan Facilities Agreement dated June 12, 2009 between Plateau, Standard Chartered Bank and Micawber 634 (Pty) Limited. (6)

 

196


Table of Contents
  4.20    Standby Loan Facility Agreement between Plateau and Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited dated June 12, 2009. (6)
  4.21    RPM Funding Loan Agreement between Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited and Holdco dated June 12, 2009. (6)
  4.22    RPM Plateau A Preference Share Subscription Agreement between Plateau, N2C Resources Inc. and Rustenburg Platinum Mines dated June 12, 2009. (6)
  4.23    Plateau Funding Loan Agreement between Plateau and Holdco dated June 12, 2009. (6)
  4.24    Operating Cash Flow Shortfall Loan Facility Agreement between Plateau and Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited dated June 12, 2009. (6)
  4.25    Opco Funding Loan Agreement between Holdco and Richtrau No. 177 (Pty) Limited dated June 12, 2009. (6)
  4.26    Conversion Implementation Agreement between the Pelawan Trust, Central Plaza Investments 78 (Pty) (to be remained Pelawan Finance SPV (Pty) Limited), Pelawan Investments (Pty) Ltd, Atlatsa, Plateau and Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited dated June 26, 2009. (6)
  4.27    RPM Funding Common Terms Agreement between, inter alia, Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Plateau, Central Plaza Investments 78 (Pty) Limited and Atlatsa dated June 12, 2009. (6)
  4.28    Amendment Agreement among Atlatsa Resources Corporation, N1C Resources Inc., N2C Resources Inc., Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Holdings Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited, Micawber 634 (RF) Proprietary Limited, Micawber 603 (RF) Proprietary Limited, Pelawan Finance SPV Proprietary Limited, the Trustees for the time being of the Pelawan Trust and the trustees for the time being of the Pelawan Dividend Trust dated May 28, 2013. (8)
  4.29    Amended and Restated Transaction Framework Agreement between Atlatsa Resources Corporation, Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Holdings Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited, Atlatsa Holdings Proprietary Limited Pelawan Finance SPV Proprietary Limited, the Trustees for the time being of the Pelawan Trust and the trustees for the time being of the Pelawan Dividend Trust dated December 12, 2013. (9)
  4.30    Amended and Restated Sale of Assets Agreement between Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited and Boikgantsho Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited dated November 15, 2013. (9)
  4.31    Amended and Restated Sale of a Portion of a Mining Right Agreement between RPM and Ga-Phasha Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited dated November 15, 2013. (9)
  4.32    Amended and Restated Global Intercreditor Agreement among Atlatsa, Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited, Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Micawber 634 (RF) Proprietary Limited, Micawber 603 (RF) Proprietary Limited, Pelawan Finance SPV Proprietary Limited, Tumelo Motsisi and Ansa Chris Harold Motaung dated March 27, 2013. (9)
  4.33    Amended and Restated Holdco Shareholders’ Agreement between Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited, Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited and Bokoni Platinum Holdings Proprietary Limited dated March 27, 2013. (9)
  4.34    Implementation Agreement between Atlatsa Resources Corporation, Camipath Proprietary Limited, N1C Resources Inc., N2C Resources Inc., Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Holdings Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited, Ga-Phasha Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited,

 

197


Table of Contents
   Boikgantsho Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited, Micawber 634 (RF) Proprietary Limited, Micawber 603 (RF) Proprietary Limited, Pelawan Investments Proprietary Limited, the Trustees for the time being of the Pelawan Trust and the trustees for the time being of the Pelawan Dividend Trust dated March 27, 2013. (9)
  4.35    RPM Funding Common Terms Agreement between Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited, Pelawan Finance SPV Proprietary Limited, Atlatsa Resources Corporation and certain others dated March 27, 2013. (9)
  4.36    Amended and Restated Subscription Agreement between Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited and Atlatsa Resources Corporation dated November 15, 2013. (9)
  4.37    Senior Term Loan and Revolving Facilities Agreement between Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited, Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Micawber 634 (RF) Proprietary Limited and Micawber 603 (RF) Proprietary Limited dated March 27, 2013. (9)
  4.38    Amended and Restated Transaction Framework Agreement between Atlatsa Resources Corporation, Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Holdings Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited, Atlatsa Holdings Proprietary Limited Pelawan Finance SPV Proprietary Limited, the Trustees for the time being of the Pelawan Trust and the trustees for the time being of the Pelawan Dividend Trust dated December 12, 2013. (9)
  4.39    Working Capital Facility Agreement between Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited and Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited dated March 27, 2013. (9)
  4.40    Amendment and Interim Implementation Agreement between Atlatsa Resources Corporation, N1C Resources Inc., N2C Resources Inc., Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Holdings Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Mine Proprietary Limited, Micawber 634 (RF) Proprietary Limited, Micawber 603 (RF) Proprietary Limited, Pelawan Finance SPV Proprietary Limited, the Trustees for the time being of the Pelawan Trust and the trustees for the time being of the Pelawan Dividend Trust dated September 26, 2012. (9)
  4.41    First Amendment And Restatement Agreement To The Senior Facilities Agreement between Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited, N2C Resources Inc., N1C Resources Inc., Bokoni Platinum Holdings Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Mines Proprietary Limited, Atlatsa Resources Corporation, Micawber 603 Proprietary Limited, Micawber 634 Proprietary Limited relating to the Amended and Restated Senior Facilities Agreement dated December 9, 2015. *
  4.42    Facility Agreement – R334 000 000 Term Loan Facility provided by Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited as Lender and Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited as Borrower dated December 9, 2015. *
  4.43    First Amendment and Restated Agreement to the Working Capital Facility Agreement between Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited as Lender and Plateau Resources Proprietary Limited as Borrower and Bokoni Platinum Holdings Proprietary Limited, Bokoni Platinum Mines Proprietary Limited, Atlatsa Resources Corporation dated May 21, 2015. *
  8.1    List of Subsidiaries. (7)
11.1    Code of Ethics. (2)
12.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
12.2    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

 

198


Table of Contents
13.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
15.1    Corporate Governance Policies and Procedures Manual issued as of November 22, 2007. (5)
15.2    Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. (10)

 

Notes:

 

* Filed herewith
(1) Incorporated by reference to Atlatsa’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended October 31, 2000.
(2) Incorporated by reference to Atlatsa’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended October 31, 2003.
(3) Incorporated by reference to Atlatsa’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004.
(4) Incorporated by reference to Atlatsa’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006.
(5) Incorporated by reference to Atlatsa’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007.
(6) Incorporated by reference to Atlatsa’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008.
(7) Incorporated by reference to Atlatsa’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010.
(8) Incorporated by reference to Atlatsa’s report on Form 6-K furnished to the Commission on September 20, 2013.
(9) Incorporated by reference to Atlatsa’s report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014
(10) Incorporated by reference to Atlatsa’s report on Form 6-K, furnished to the Commission on March 30, 2016.

 

199

Grafico Azioni Atlas Copco (PK) (USOTC:ATLRF)
Storico
Da Apr 2024 a Mag 2024 Clicca qui per i Grafici di Atlas Copco (PK)
Grafico Azioni Atlas Copco (PK) (USOTC:ATLRF)
Storico
Da Mag 2023 a Mag 2024 Clicca qui per i Grafici di Atlas Copco (PK)