As part of the Company’s commitment to good corporate governance practices and principles and in furtherance of Board refreshment initiatives, in 2018, the Board adopted as part of its corporate governance principles a mandatory director retirement age of 75 and set a director term limit of 12 years, subject to certain exceptions to allow for terms of up to no more than 15 years as necessary to ensure an orderly transition of Board members and leadership positions. In December 2020, the Board made revisions to the mandatory director retirement age to allow the Board, on the recommendation of the Environmental, Social, Governance and Nominating Committee and for good cause shown, to provide up to two, one-year waivers of this retirement requirement.
In December 2020, the Board, upon the recommendation of the Environmental, Social, Governance and Nominating Committee, voted to utilize the exception to the director term limit policy to allow Mr. England to stand for re-election at the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders despite his having achieved 12 years of Board service, in order to ensure continuity of leadership, due to the small size of the Board and in consideration of Mr. England’s leadership and capabilities.
In January 2022, the Board, upon the recommendation of the Environmental, Social, Governance and Nominating Committee, voted to utilize the exception to the director term limit and mandatory retirement age policy to allow Mr. England to stand for re-election at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2022 Annual Meeting”) notwithstanding his having achieved more than 12 years of Board service and having reached the age of 75. This decision was made in consideration of Mr. England’s unique leadership strengths — he was (and continues to be) the only independent Director nominee with chief executive officer experience — and his deep understanding of the Company and service on the Board helps to provide balance and continuity of leadership given the significant number of new Board members elected in 2021.
In December 2022, the Board further amended the Company’s corporate governance principles to allow the Board, on the recommendation of the Environmental, Social, Governance and Nominating Committee, for good cause shown, to waive the mandatory retirement age requirement as to any Director if it deems such waiver to be in the best interest of the Company (without limiting the number of waivers available to a Director). In addition, the director term limit provisions of the corporate governance principles were further amended to provide that the Board shall not nominate for re-election any Director that has completed 12 years of service as a Director of the Company on or prior to the date of election to which such nomination relates; provided, however, that the Board, on the recommendation of the Environmental, Social, Governance and Nominating Committee, may exempt a director from this restriction provided that such Director has not completed more than 20 years of service as a Director of the Company on or prior to the date of election to which such nomination relates.
In December 2022, the Board, upon the recommendation of the Environmental, Social, Governance and Nominating Committee, voted to utilize the exceptions to the mandatory retirement age and director term limit policy to allow Mr. England to stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting despite his having attained the age of 75 and having achieved more than 12 years of Board service, in order to ensure continuity of leadership and in consideration for Mr. England’s leadership and capabilities.
DIRECTOR ORIENTATION
As part of our Director orientation process, each new Director is provided with orientation materials, attends a presentation by the management team with the opportunity for questions and engagement and participates in a tour of the Company’s manufacturing facility.
MAJORITY VOTING STANDARD IN DIRECTOR ELECTIONS
In 2016, the Board approved an amendment to the Company’s by-laws to, among other changes, adopt a majority voting standard in uncontested Director elections, providing that each Director shall be elected by a majority of votes cast. Under our amended and restated by-laws, a majority of the votes cast standard requires that the number of shares voted “for” a Director must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that Director’s election. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not counted as votes cast with respect to a Director’s election.
In addition, following certification of the stockholder vote in an uncontested election, if any incumbent Director receives a greater number of votes “against” his or her election than votes “for” his or her election, the Director shall promptly tender his or her resignation to the Chairman of the Board. The Environmental, Social, Governance and Nominating Committee shall promptly consider such resignation and recommend to the Board whether to accept the tendered resignation or reject it. In deciding upon its recommendation, the Environmental, Social, Governance and Nominating Committee shall consider all relevant factors including, without limitation, the length of service and qualifications of the Director and the Director’s contributions to the Company and the Board.