If any of the securities being registered on this form are offered
on a delayed or continuous basis in reliance on Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, other than securities offered in connection
with a dividend reinvestment plan, check the following box.
x
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement
number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.
¨
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule
462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier
effective registration statement for the same offering.
¨
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule
462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier
effective registration statement for the same offering.
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated
filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated
filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large Accelerated Filer [ ] Accelerated Filer
[ ] Non-Accelerated Filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [X]
RISK FACTORS
An investment in
our securities involves certain risks relating to our business and operations. You should carefully consider these risks, together
with all of the other information included in this prospectus, before you decide whether to purchase shares of our Company. If
any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely
affected. If that happens, the trading price of our common stock could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Related to Our Business
Our auditors have
expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
Our audited financial statements
for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, were prepared assuming that we will continue our operations as a going concern.
We do not, however, have a history of operating profitably. Consequently, our independent accountants in their audit report have
expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our continued operations are highly dependent upon
our ability to increase revenues, decrease operating costs, and complete equity and/or debt financings. Such financings may not
be available or may not be available on reasonable terms. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result
from the outcome of this uncertainty. We estimate that we will not be able to continue as a going concern after June 30, 2014 unless
we are able to secure capital from one of these sources of financing. If we are unable to secure such financing, we may cease operations
and investors in our common stock could lose all of their investment.
We have not voluntarily
implemented various corporate governance measures, in the absence of which, shareholders may have more limited protections against
interested director transactions, conflicts of interest and similar matters.
Federal legislation, including
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has resulted in the adoption of various corporate governance measures designed to promote the integrity
of the corporate management and the securities markets. Some of these measures have been adopted in response to legal requirements.
Others have been adopted by companies in response to the requirements of national securities exchanges, such as the NYSE or the
Nasdaq Stock Market, on which their securities are listed. Among the corporate governance measures that are required under the
rules of national securities exchanges are those that address board of directors' independence, and audit committee oversight.
We have not yet adopted any of these corporate governance measures and, since our securities are not yet listed on a national securities
exchange, we are not required to do so. It is possible that if we were to adopt some or all of these corporate governance measures,
stockholders would benefit from somewhat greater assurances that internal corporate decisions were being made by disinterested
directors and that policies had been implemented to define responsible conduct. Prospective investors should bear in mind our current
lack of corporate governance measures in formulating their investment decisions.
As a smaller public
company, our costs of complying with SEC reporting rules are disproportionately high relative to other larger companies.
Fuelstream is considered
a “reporting issuer” under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Therefore, we incur certain costs of compliance
with applicable SEC reporting rules and regulations including, but not limited to attorneys fees, accounting and auditing fees,
other professional fees, financial printing costs and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance costs in an amount estimated at approximately $200,000
per year. In proportion to our operations, these costs are far more significant than our publicly-traded competitors. Unless we
are able to reduce these costs or increase our operating revenues, our costs to remain a reporting issuer will limit our ability
to use our cash resources for other more productive uses that could provide returns to our shareholders.
We are highly dependent
upon a few key fuel supply contracts, the termination of which would have a material adverse effect on our business and financial
condition.
Although
we intend to grow Fuelstream to become a larger provider of fuel and related services to a wide variety of corporate and individual
clients, at present we have a small customer base and are highly dependent upon
a few key
fuel supply agreements. We are therefore highly dependent upon these agreements. The termination of any of our fuel supply agreements
would have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition, and we cannot guarantee that we will be able to replace
any such agreements with other paying customers.
We extend credit
to some of our customers in connection with their purchases of fuel and related services from us, and our business, financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows will be adversely affected if we are unable to collect accounts receivable.
While
some of our customers pre-pay for fuel and related services that we provide, we extend credit to others. One element of our success
in attracting new customers has been due, in part, to our willingness to extend credit on an unsecured basis to purchasers that
would otherwise be required to prepay or post letters of credit with other of our competitors. Our exposure to credit losses depends
on the financial condition of our customers and other factors beyond our control, such as deteriorating conditions in the world
economy or in the transportation industry, political instability, terrorist activities, military action and natural disasters in
our market areas. The unprecedented levels of disruption and volatility in the credit and financial markets over the past several
years have increased our possible exposure to customer credit risk because it has made it harder for our customers to access sufficient
capital to meet their liquidity needs. This market turmoil coupled with a reduction of business activity generally increases our
risks related to our status as an unsecured creditor of these customers. Credit losses, if significant, would have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We do not presently
have a traditional credit facility with a financial institution. This absence may adversely affect our operations.
To expand our business,
we require access to capital and credit. We do not presently have a traditional credit facility with a financial institution. The
absence of a traditional credit facility with a financial institution could adversely impact our operations. If we are unable to
access lines of credit for fuel purchases, we may be unable to sell fuel to customers who would otherwise be willing to enter into
purchase contracts with us. The loss of potential and existing customers because of an inability to finance the purchase of fuel
would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We are exposed
to counterparty risk in connection with certain of our contracts. The soundness of our counterparties, which include our customers
and suppliers, could adversely affect us.
We
operate principally in the aviation services industry and have exposure to our customers and suppliers in this industry. As part
of our business, we offer our customers various pricing structures for fuel purchases, as well as ancillary products and services
incidental to air travel and logistics. For example, in the ordinary course of business we may enter into fixed forward pricing
contracts with our customers and suppliers under which we agree to sell or purchase, as the case may be, fuel at fixed prices and
they agree to purchase or sell, as the case may be, fixed volumes of fuel during the term of the contract. If there is a significant
fluctuation in the price of fuel, there is a risk they could decide to, or be forced to, default under their obligations to us.
Even if the counterparty to a fixed forward pricing contract does not default, if a customer has agreed to purchase fuel from us
at a fixed price and the price of fuel subsequently drops, we will be, in effect, extending unsecured credit to that customer at
the time the fuel is purchased. If such customer is not creditworthy or is unable to pay us, we may suffer losses from such agreements
and our operating results and financial condition would likely be materially adversely affected.
We face exposure
from changes in fuel prices because we do not employ hedging strategies.
Fuel
prices have been extremely volatile in the recent past, are likely to continue to be volatile in the future and depend on factors
outside of our control, such as:
|
·
|
expected and actual
supply and demand for fuel;
|
|
·
|
laws and regulations
related to environmental matters, including those mandating or incentivizing alternative energy sources or otherwise addressing
global climate change;
|
|
·
|
changes in pricing
or production controls by OPEC;
|
|
·
|
technological advances
affecting energy consumption and supply;
|
|
·
|
energy conservation
efforts;
|
|
·
|
price and availability
of alternative fuels; and
|
We
have not employed the use of derivatives of other hedging strategies to guard against losses caused by any of these factors in
respect of any long-term fuel supply contracts that we may enter into. Moreover, if fuel prices increase, our customers may not
be able to purchase as much fuel from us because of their credit limits, which could also adversely impact their businesses sufficiently
enough to cause them to be unable to make payments owed to us for fuel purchased on credit. They may also choose to reduce the
amount of fuel they consume in their operations to reduce costs or to otherwise comply with new environmental regulations to obtain
incentives associated therewith. We cannot assure you that the volume of orders from our customers would increase again or that
we would be able to replace lost volumes with new customers. In addition, if fuel prices increase, our own credit limits could
prevent us from purchasing enough fuel from our suppliers to meet our customers' demands or could require us to use so much cash
for fuel purchases as to impair our liquidity.
Economic, political
and other risks associated with international sales and operations could adversely affect our business and future operating results.
Because
we offer fuel products and services in the United States as well as internationally, our business is subject to risks associated
with doing business internationally. Our business and future operating results could be harmed by a variety of factors, including:
|
·
|
trade protection
measures and import or export licensing requirements, which could increase our costs of doing business internationally;
|
|
·
|
the costs of hiring
and retaining senior management or entering into joint ventures for overseas operations;
|
|
·
|
unexpected changes
in regulatory requirements, which may be costly and require significant time to implement;
|
|
·
|
laws restricting
us from repatriating profits earned from our activities within foreign countries, including the payment of distributions;
|
|
·
|
governmental actions
that may result in the deprivation of our contractual rights or the inability to obtain or retain authorizations required to conduct
our business;
|
|
·
|
political risks specific
to foreign jurisdictions; and
|
|
·
|
terrorism, war, civil
unrest and natural disasters.
|
In
particular, we are looking to expand into emerging markets in such locations as the Caribbean and continental Africa, which have
been plagued by corruption and have uncertain regulatory environments, both of which could have a negative impact on our operations
there.
Third parties who
fail to provide services to us and our customers as agreed could harm our business.
We
use third parties to provide various services to our customers, including into-plane fueling at airports, as well as concierge,
baggage handling, and travel services. The failure of these third parties to perform these services in accordance with contractual
terms for any reason, such as an interruption of their business because of weather, environmental or labor difficulties or political
unrest, could affect our relationships with our customers and subject us to claims and other liabilities which might have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. To the extent that we use third parties
in our operations in emerging markets, we are also subject to the risk that we could be held accountable for the failure of these
third parties to comply with the laws and regulations of the U.S. government and various international jurisdictions.
If the fuel we
purchase from our suppliers fails to meet our contractual specifications we have agreed to supply to our customers, our business
could be adversely affected.
We
purchase fuel from various suppliers for resale to our customers. If the fuel we resell fails to meet the specifications we have
agreed to with customers, our relationship with our customers could be adversely affected and we could be subject to claims and
other liabilities that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows. Although in most cases we have recourse against our suppliers for fuel which fails to meet contractual specifications, such
recourse cannot be assured.
Non-performance
of suppliers on their sale commitments and customers on their purchase commitments could disrupt our business.
We
enter into sale and purchase agreements with customers and suppliers for fuel at fixed prices. To the extent either a customer
or supplier fails to perform on their commitment, we may be required to sell or purchase the fuel at prevailing market prices,
which could be significantly different than the fixed price within the sale and purchase agreements and therefore significant differences
in these prices could cause losses that would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows.
Material disruptions
in the availability or supply of fuel would adversely affect our business.
The
success of our business depends on our ability to purchase, sell and coordinate delivery of fuel and fuel-related services to our
customers. Our business would be adversely affected to the extent that political instability, natural disasters, terrorist activity,
military action or other conditions disrupt the availability or supply of fuel. In addition, we rely on a single or limited number
of suppliers for the provision of fuel and related services in certain markets. These parties may have significant negotiation
leverage over us, and should they be unable or unwilling to supply us on commercially reasonable terms, our business would be adversely
affected.
If we are unable
to retain our sales staff, our business and results of operations could be harmed.
Our
ability to compete with other fuel resellers and develop our business is largely dependent on the services of Sean Wagner, our
Vice President of Sales, and other employees which assist him in securing sales of aviation fuel. If we are unable to retain Mr.
Wagner’s services and to attract other qualified senior management and key personnel on terms satisfactory to us, our business
will be adversely affected. We do not have key man life insurance covering the life of Mr. Wagner and, even if we are able to afford
such a key man policy, our coverage levels may not be sufficient to offset any losses we may suffer as a result of Mr. Wagner’s
death, disability, or other inability to perform services for us.
We may acquire
businesses and enter into joint ventures that will expose us to increased operating risks.
As
part of our growth strategy, we intend to acquire other fuel resellers and other related service businesses. We cannot provide
any assurance that we will find attractive acquisition candidates in the future, that we will be able to acquire such candidates
on economically acceptable terms or that we will be able to finance acquisitions on economically acceptable terms. Even if we are
able to acquire new businesses in the future, they could result in the
incurrence
of substantial additional indebtedness and other expenses or potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities and may affect
the market price of our common stock or restrict our operations. We have also entered into joint venture arrangements intended
to complement or expand our business and will likely continue to do so in the future. These joint ventures are subject to substantial
risks and liabilities associated with their operations, as well as the risk that our relationships with our joint venture partners
do not succeed in the manner that we anticipate.
Our international
operations require us to comply with U.S. anti-corruption laws which may cause us to lose valuable contracts.
Doing
business internationally requires us to comply with the laws and regulations of the U.S. government and various international jurisdictions.
These regulations can place restrictions on our operations, trade practices and partners and investment decisions. In particular,
our international operations are subject to U.S. and foreign anti-corruption laws and regulations, such as the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act ("FCPA"). The FCPA prohibits us from providing anything of value to foreign officials for the purposes
of influencing official decisions or obtaining or retaining business. As part of our business, we deal with state-owned business
enterprises, the employees of which are considered foreign officials for purposes of the FCPA. In addition, some of the international
locations in which we operate or seek to operate lack a developed legal system and have higher than normal levels of corruption.
Violations of the FCPA are punishable by civil penalties, including fines, denial of export privileges, injunctions, asset seizures,
debarment from government contracts and revocations or restrictions of licenses, as well as criminal fines and imprisonment. Our
competitors who are not subject to the FCPA may have greater latitude in securing key contracts with foreign airlines and commercial
aircraft owners, and we may therefore fail to compete effectively in such jurisdictions.
We face intense
competition and, if we are not able to effectively compete in our markets, our revenues may decrease.
Competitive
pressures in our markets could adversely affect our competitive position, leading to a possible loss of customers or a decrease
in prices, either of which could result in decreased revenues and profits. Our competitors are numerous, ranging from large multinational
corporations, which have significantly greater capital resources than us, to relatively small and specialized firms. In addition
to competing with fuel resellers, we also compete with the major oil producers that market fuel directly to the large commercial
airlines and private aircraft owners. Our business could be adversely affected because of increased competition from these oil
companies, who may choose to increase their direct marketing or provide less advantageous price and credit terms to us than to
our fuel reseller competitors.
Current and future
litigation could adversely affect us.
We
are currently involved in certain legal proceedings, the outcome of which we believe is material to our business and results of
operations. We are also involved in other legal proceedings in our ordinary course of business. Lawsuits and other legal proceedings
can involve substantial costs, including the costs associated with investigation, litigation and possible settlement, judgment,
penalty or fine. As a smaller company, the collective costs of litigation proceedings can represent a drain on our cash resources,
as well as an inordinate amount of our Management’s time and addition. Moreover, an adverse ruling in respect of certain
litigation could have a material adverse effect on our results of operation and financial condition.
See “Legal Proceedings”
on page 27.
We have limited
the liability of our board of directors and management.
We
have adopted provisions in our Certificate of Incorporation which limit the liability of our directors and officers and have also
adopted provisions in our bylaws which provide for indemnification by the Company of our officers and directors to the fullest
extent permitted by Delaware corporate law. Our Certificate of Incorporation generally provides that our directors shall have no
personal liability to the Company or its stockholders for monetary damages for breaches of their fiduciary duties as directors,
except for breaches of their duties of loyalty, acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or
knowing violation of law, acts involving unlawful payment of dividends or unlawful stock purchases or redemptions, or any transaction
from which a director derives an improper personal benefit. Such provisions substantially limit our shareholders’ ability
to hold directors liable for breaches of fiduciary duty.
In addition to provisions
in our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, we have also entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and officers
that provide a right of indemnification to the fullest extent permissible under Delaware law. These charter, Bylaw, and contractual
provisions may limit our shareholders’ ability to hold our directors and officers accountable for breaches of their duties,
or otherwise discourage shareholders from enforcing their rights, either directly or derivatively, against our directors or officers.
Our share structure
could impede a non-negotiated change of control of the Company.
We
have issued all 200 shares of our authorized preferred stock. Each share of preferred stock, although not convertible into common
stock, has 20,000,000 votes per share and is entitled to be voted together with our common stock on all matters. Consequently,
any attempt to take over the Company without the consent of our preferred stockholders would be extremely difficult to achieve.
Because of the disproportionate voting control of our preferred stock, the holder(s) of our preferred stock could inhibit, delay,
or frustrate entirely an attempt by others to take over control of our Company and could prevent our shareholders from obtaining
a premium for their shares. In addition, the holder(s) of our preferred stock hold a controlling beneficial interest in our Company
and may unilaterally determine the election of our board of directors and other substantive matters requiring approval of our stockholders
and, therefore, may unilaterally determine the direction of our Company.
Risks Relating To This Offering and Our
Common Stock
If the selling shareholder
sells a large number of shares all at once or in blocks, the market price of our shares would most likely decline.
The selling shareholder
is offering up to 42,505,433 shares of our common stock through this prospectus. Should the selling stockholder decide to sell
our shares at a price below the current market price at which they are quoted, such sales will cause that market price to decline.
Moreover, we believe that the offer or sale of a large number of shares at any price may cause the market price to fall. A steep
decline in the price of our common stock would adversely affect our ability to raise additional equity capital, and even if we
were successful in raising such capital, the terms of such raise may be substantially dilutive to current shareholders.
All shareholders
will experience immediate dilution from a conversion of the Note.
This prospectus covers
the registration of up to 42,505,433 shares of our common stock. As of the date of this prospectus, none of these shares have been
issued. The shares will be issuable from the conversion of a Note, which is convertible at a significant discount to the quoted
price of our common stock. Any conversion of the Note will dilute the holdings of our existing shareholders by the proportion of
our outstanding shares represented by the new shares issued to the Note holder.
The Note may convert
into a greater number of shares than we have assumed in this prospectus.
The agreements we entered
into in connection with the issuance of the Note require us to register up to 42,505,433 shares of our common stock for resale
by the selling stockholder, but the actual number of shares we may end up issuing to the selling stockholder may be substantially
higher. The conversion price for the Note is a 40% discount from the average of the three (3) lowest daily volume weighted average
prices as reported by the OTCQB for the ten (10) trading days ending on the trading day prior to the conversion date. For purposes
of this prospectus, we have assumed a conversion price of $0.0050. However, since there is no minimum conversion price and, consequently,
even though this prospectus covers only 42,505,433 shares, we may be required to issue a much larger number of shares of our common
stock if the trading price were to decrease substantially. In such a circumstance, our existing shareholders could suffer substantial
dilution and we cannot guarantee that investors would not lose their entire investment.
The market price
of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.
The market price and marketability
of shares of our common stock may be affected significantly by numerous factors, including some over which we have no control and
which may not be directly related to us. These factors include the following:
|
·
|
The lack of trading volume in our shares;
|
|
·
|
Price and volume fluctuations in the stock market from time to time, which often are unrelated
to our operating performance;
|
|
·
|
Variations in our operating results;
|
|
·
|
Any shortfall in revenue or any increase in losses from expected levels;
|
|
·
|
Announcements of new initiatives, joint ventures, or commercial arrangements; and
|
|
·
|
General economic trends and other external factors.
|
|
·
|
If the trading price of our common stock falls significantly following completion of this offering,
this may cause some of our shareholders to sell our shares, which would further adversely affect the trading market for, and liquidity
of, our common stock. If we seek to raise capital through future equity financings, this volatility may adversely affect our ability
to raise such equity capital.
|
Though our common
stock is quoted on the OTCQB, there is no established public market for our common stock, which means that it may be difficult
to sell your shares.
Our common stock is quoted
on the OTCQB under the symbol “FLST.” There is, however, presently no active public market in our shares. We cannot
assure you that such an active market for our common stock will develop. The over-the-counter market is a significantly more limited
market than established trading markets such as the New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq. Broker dealers may not be willing to make
a market in our shares. In addition, the OTCQB and similar quotation services are often characterized by low trading volumes, and
price volatility, which may make it difficult for an investor to sell our common stock on acceptable terms.
Our common stock
is subject to the “penny stock” rules of the SEC and the trading market in our securities is limited, which makes transactions
in our stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment in our stock.
Under U.S. federal securities
legislation, our common stock will constitute “penny stock”. A penny stock is any equity security that has a market
price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt,
the rules require that a broker or dealer approve a potential investor’s account for transactions in penny stocks, and the
broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the
penny stock to be purchased. In order to approve an investor’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer
must obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person, and make a reasonable determination that
the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial
matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks. The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to
any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight
form sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination. Brokers may be less willing to execute
transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose
of our common stock and cause a decline in the market value of our stock. Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing
in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and
the registered
representative, current quotations for the
securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly
statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited
market in penny stocks.
Because we do not
intend to pay any cash dividends on our common stock, our stockholders will not be able to receive a return on their shares unless
they sell them.
We have never paid a dividend
and we intend to retain any future earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business. Consequently, we do not anticipate
paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Unless we pay dividends, our stockholders will not be
able to receive a return on their shares unless they sell them. We cannot assure you that stockholders will be able to sell shares
when desired.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
All other information required in the financial
statement schedules has been incorporated in the financial statements or notes thereto or has been omitted since the information
is not applicable or not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Fuelstream, Inc.
We have audited the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Fuelstream, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the two years in
the period ended December 31, 2013. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We have conducted our
audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control
over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing
audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness
of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining,
on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Fuelstream, Inc. as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the consolidated results of their operation and cash flow for
each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.
The accompanying consolidated
financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements, the Company has sustained substantial net losses and stockholders’ deficit. These conditions
raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters also
are described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome
of this uncertainty.
/s/RBSM LLP
New York, NY
March 31, 2014
FUELSTREAM, INC.
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
43,159
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
223,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
28,000
|
|
|
$
|
223,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
826,832
|
|
|
$
|
805,718
|
|
Due to related parties
|
|
|
56,973
|
|
|
|
104,254
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
788,771
|
|
|
|
1,196,045
|
|
Convertible debenture/notes payable - short
term (net of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
discount of $286,751 and $-0-, respectively)
|
|
|
226,250
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Convertible notes payable - related parties
|
|
|
211,254
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
1,093,382
|
|
|
|
1,678,300
|
|
Notes payable - related parties
|
|
|
2,115,870
|
|
|
|
1,493,500
|
|
Derivative liability
|
|
|
558,548
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
5,877,880
|
|
|
|
5,277,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG TERM LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible debenture/notes payable (net of
discount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$50,082 and $262,006, respectively)
|
|
|
4,918
|
|
|
|
107,994
|
|
Derivative liability
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
265,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long Term Liabilities
|
|
|
4,918
|
|
|
|
373,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
|
|
5,882,798
|
|
|
|
5,651,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 200 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
authorized, 200 and 200 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 150,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and 50,000,000 shares authorized, 37,709,552
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,216,848 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
3,771
|
|
|
|
1,522
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
50,126,878
|
|
|
|
46,413,042
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(55,985,447
|
)
|
|
|
(51,842,805
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders' Deficit
|
|
|
(5,854,798
|
)
|
|
|
(5,428,241
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
$
|
28,000
|
|
|
$
|
223,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are
an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
|
FUELSTREAM, INC.
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET SALES
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,054,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COST OF SALES
|
|
|
26,895
|
|
|
|
907,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS MARGIN
|
|
|
3,105
|
|
|
|
147,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SELLING, GENERAL AND
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,000,410
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
2,795,600
|
|
|
|
13,036,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Selling, General and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
2,795,600
|
|
|
|
19,037,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS
|
|
|
(2,792,495
|
)
|
|
|
(18,889,361
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on forgiveness of debt
|
|
|
43,920
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain (Loss) on change in fair value of derivative
liability
|
|
|
233,667
|
|
|
|
(83,464
|
)
|
Non-cash finance charge
|
|
|
(464,442
|
)
|
|
|
(199,625
|
)
|
Interest expense (including amortization of
debt discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of $657,161, and $107,994, respectively)
|
|
|
(1,163,292
|
)
|
|
|
(565,091
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other (Expenses)
|
|
|
(1,350,147
|
)
|
|
|
(848,180
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
(4,142,642
|
)
|
|
|
(19,737,541
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS
|
|
$
|
(4,142,642
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,737,541
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC AND DILUTED:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.76
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
21,605,080
|
|
|
|
11,207,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are
an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
|
FUELSTREAM, INC.
|
Consolidated Statements of
Stockholders' Deficit
|
For the Period January 1,
2012 through December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Stockholders'
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Capital
|
|
Deficit
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2012
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,167,747
|
|
|
$
|
317
|
|
|
$
|
30,649,006
|
|
|
$
|
(32,105,264
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,455,941
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Aviation Fuel International, Inc.
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7,400,000
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
3,773,260
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,774,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for acquiring interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in business in September 2012
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,063,550
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
5,158,669
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,158,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for services and along
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with note payable, September 2012
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
849,966
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
850,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for services,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2012
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,220,551
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
5,533,156
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,533,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for services,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 2012
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
74,997
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial conversion feature relating to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
convertible debt
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of vested options
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
123,988
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
123,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(19,737,541
|
)
|
|
|
(19,737,541
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2012
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
15,216,848
|
|
|
$
|
1,522
|
|
|
$
|
46,413,042
|
|
|
$
|
(51,842,805
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,428,241
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for services,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2013
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
49,951
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
82,414
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
82,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of vested options
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
249,643
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
249,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for services,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2013
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
254,000
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
304,775
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
304,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for conversion of debt
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11,889,566
|
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
|
|
1,473,224
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,474,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for services,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 2013
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
606,438
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
52,269
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
52,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for services,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2013
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,600,000
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
743,240
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
743,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for services,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 2013
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,075,713
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
354,792
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
355,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial conversion feature relating to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
convertible debt
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
311,488
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
311,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock sold for cash
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,017,036
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
141,991
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
142,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(4,142,642
|
)
|
|
|
(4,142,642
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2013
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
37,709,552
|
|
|
$
|
3,771
|
|
|
$
|
50,126,878
|
|
|
$
|
(55,985,447
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,854,798
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
|
FUELSTREAM, INC.
|
Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(4,142,642
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,737,541
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable related party issued for services
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on forgiveness of debt
|
|
|
(43,920
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Common stock issued for services and finance
expenses
|
|
|
1,538,351
|
|
|
|
11,617,252
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
249,643
|
|
|
|
123,989
|
|
Operating expenses incurred by noteholders on
behalf of the Company
|
|
|
83,482
|
|
|
|
272,000
|
|
Non-cash interest expenses
|
|
|
464,441
|
|
|
|
62,125
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative liability
|
|
|
(233,669
|
)
|
|
|
83,464
|
|
Amortization of debt discounts
|
|
|
657,160
|
|
|
|
107,995
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,000,410
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
670,000
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
152,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
613,229
|
|
|
|
579,902
|
|
Due to related parties
|
|
|
73,973
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities
|
|
|
(507,952
|
)
|
|
|
(145,405
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of common stock
|
|
|
142,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from notes payable
|
|
|
400,600
|
|
|
|
188,000
|
|
Payments on notes payable
|
|
|
(78,000
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
|
|
|
464,793
|
|
|
|
188,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
$
|
(43,159
|
)
|
|
$
|
42,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
|
|
43,159
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
43,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Payments For:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
7,795
|
|
|
$
|
5,036
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial derivative liability on convertible
note payable
|
|
$
|
860,708
|
|
|
$
|
182,125
|
|
Beneficial conversion feature on convertible
note credited to additional paid in capital
|
|
$
|
311,488
|
|
|
$
|
250,000
|
|
Common stock issued for settlement of notes
payable
|
|
$
|
1,376,880
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Common stock issued for accrued expenses and
accrued interest
|
|
$
|
73,297
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Reclassification from accrued interest to note
payable - related party
|
|
$
|
837,370
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Accrued expenses paid by convertible noteholder
|
|
$
|
31,500
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Reclassification of note and accrued interest
from related party to non-related party
|
|
$
|
228,300
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Reclassification from due to related party to
convertible note payable - related party
|
|
$
|
121,254
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Acquisition of AFI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable acquired
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
850,000
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6,000,410
|
|
Accounts payable assumed
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(536,610
|
)
|
Notes payable assumed
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(1,356,300
|
)
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
4,957,500
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,774,000
|
|
Note payable issued - related party
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,000,000
|
|
Loan receivable adjusted
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
183,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are
an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
|
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATION
Fuelstream, Inc. (the “Company”)
was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on July 12, 1996 under the name of “Durwood, Inc.” From April
6, 1999 to April 9, 2010, the Company operated as a sports marketing firm under the name of “Sportsnuts.” Inc. On April
9, 2010, the Company changed its name to Fuelstream, Inc. and changed its business model to become a fuel transportation and logistics
company.
On April 11, 2011, the Company entered
into a joint venture agreement (“Joint Venture”) with Aviation Fuel International, Inc., a Florida corporation (“AFI”)
and a purchaser and reseller of aviation fuel for commercial and private aircraft. The Joint Venture required the Company to contribute
up to $200,000 in respect of supplying aviation fuel to various commercial aircraft via tanker trucks which were intended to be
acquired by the Joint Venture. The Company ultimately contributed $183,500 in connection with the Joint Venture. On January 18,
2012, the Joint Venture was terminated upon completion of the acquisition of AFI, which is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company (refer to note 3)
On May 10, 2012, the Company along
with two partners formed AFI South Africa LLC (“AFI SA”), immediately the Company purchased shares of the other partners
to become 100% owner of AFI SA (refer to note 3). AFI SA was effective as Limited Liability Company under the Act by the filing
organization with the office of the Secretary of State of Florida on May 11, 2012. The Company has been organized for the purpose
of partnering with Global Aviation for brokering the sale of Fuel for aircraft in South Africa.
NOTE 2 - GOING CONCERN CONSIDERATIONS
The accompanying consolidated
financial statements have been prepared using generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern which
contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The accumulated
deficit as of December 31, 2013 was $55,985,447 and the total stockholders’ deficit at December 31, 2013 was $5,854,798
and had working capital deficit, continued losses, and negative cash flows from operations. These factors combined, raise
substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans to address and
alleviate these concerns are as follows:
The Company’s management continues
to develop a strategy of exploring all options available to it so that it can develop successful operations and have sufficient
funds, therefore, as to be able to operate over the next twelve months. The Company is attempting to improve these conditions by
way of financial assistance through issuances of additional equity and by generating revenues by facilitating the sale of aircraft
fuel. No assurance can be given that funds will be available, or, if available, that it will be on terms deemed satisfactory to
management. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully increase market
share, margins on fuel resales, and greater industry visibility.
NOTE 3 - ACQUISITION
On January 18, 2012 the Company completed
the acquisition of 100% of the equity of Aviation Fuel International, Inc., a Florida corporation (“AFI”). AFI is a
purchaser and reseller of aviation fuel for commercial and private aircraft. The consideration for the acquisition of AFI consisted
of
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
7,400,000 shares of restricted common
stock, loan receivable adjusted for $183,500 and a note payable in the amount of $1,000,000. As part of the acquisition, the Company
recorded goodwill in the amount of $6,000,410.
|
|
|
Amount
|
Accounts receivable acquired
|
|
|
$ 850,000
|
Goodwill acquired
|
|
|
6,000,410
|
Less liabilities assumed
|
|
|
|
Note payable acquired
|
|
1,356,300
|
|
Accounts payable acquired
|
|
536,610
|
|
Net liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(1,892,910)
|
Total Purchase price
|
|
|
$ 4,957,500
|
|
|
|
|
The total purchase price was $4,957,500
which was paid by issuance of 7,400,000 shares of common stock, payment adjusted through loan receivable of $183,500 and issuance
of note payable of $1,000,000.
Goodwill represents the excess of
the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable tangible assets acquired. As of December 31, 2012, the Company impaired
the total goodwill. Management performed impairment analysis in fourth quarter of 2012 and decided to write off goodwill. Following
is a pro-forma unaudited consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 as though the acquisition of
AFI had occurred at the beginning of the period.
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
NET SALES
|
|
$
|
1,054,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COST OF SALES
|
|
|
907,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS MARGIN
|
|
|
147,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Selling, General and
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative
Expenses
|
|
|
19,037,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS
|
|
|
(18,889,361
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Income (Expenses)
|
|
|
(848,180
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
(19,737,541
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS
|
|
$
|
(19,737,541
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC AND DILUTED:
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share
|
|
$
|
(1.76
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
11,207,869
|
|
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
On May 10, 2012, the Company along
with two partners formed AFI South Africa LLC (“AFI SA”), during the year itself the Company purchased shares of the
other partners to become 100% owner of AFI SA. AFI SA was effective as Limited Liability Company under the Act by the filing organization
with the office of the Secretary of State of Florida on May 11, 2012. The Company has been organized for the purpose of partnering
with Global Aviation for brokering the sale of Fuel for aircraft in South Africa.
On September 2012, the Company issued
2,063,550 shares of Common stock to the partner to purchase there 20% interest in AFI SA. The Company charged to operation the
fair value of the shares issued of $5,158,875.
NOTE 4 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
a.
|
Principles of Consolidation
|
The consolidated financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”) and
include the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
|
b.
|
Concentrations of Credit Risk
|
For the year ended December
31, 2013 and 2012, one customer accounted for 100% and 98% of total revenue, respectively, representing a material amount of
customer concentration. For the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, one disputed customers accounted for 100% of total
accounts receivable, representing a material amount of credit risk.
|
c.
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
Cash Equivalents include short-term,
highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of acquisition.
Accounts receivable are
recorded net of the allowance for doubtful accounts of $670,000 as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company
generally offers 30-day credit terms on sales to its customers and requires no collateral. The Company maintains an allowance
for doubtful accounts which is determined based on a number of factors, including each customer’s financial condition,
general economic trends and management judgment.
Revenue from the sale of fuel is
recognized when the sales price is fixed or determinable, collectability is reasonably assured and title passes to the customer,
which is when the delivery of fuel is made to our customer directly from us, the supplier or a third-party subcontractor. Our fuel
sales are generated principally as a fuel reseller, although at some point we intend to have inventories from which we may make
deliveries. When acting as a fuel reseller, we generally purchase fuel from the supplier, mark it up and contemporaneously resell
the fuel to the customer, normally taking delivery for purchased fuel at the same place and time as the delivery is made to the
customer. We record the gross sale of the fuel as we generally take inventory risk, have latitude in establishing the sales price,
have discretion in the supplier selection, maintain credit risk and are the
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
primary obligor in the sales
arrangement. Returns or discounts, if any, are netted against gross revenues. For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012,
sales are recorded net of the allowance for returns and discounts of $-0-.
The preparation of the consolidated
financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
The Company follows the policy of
charging the costs of advertising to expense as incurred. Advertising expense is included in cost of sales in the consolidated
statements of operations as it relates directly to the revenues associated with events managed by the Company. Advertising expense
for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $-0-.
|
h.
|
Basic
and Fully Diluted Net Loss Per Share
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
Basic and fully diluted net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (numerator)
|
|
$
|
(4,142,642
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,737,541
|
)
|
Shares (denominator)
|
|
|
21,605,080
|
|
|
|
11,207,869
|
|
Per share amount
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.76
|
)
|
The basic income (loss) per
share of common stock is based on the weighted average number of shares issued and outstanding during the period of the financial
statements. Diluted EPS assumes the exercise of stock option and the conversion of convertible debt, provided the effect is not
antidilutive. The effect of computing diluted loss per share is anti-dilutive and, as such, basic and diluted loss per share is
the same for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
The Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) has issued FASB ASC 740-10. FASB ASC 740-10 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized
in an enterprise's financial statements. This standard requires a company to determine whether it is more likely than not
that a tax position will be sustained will be sustained upon examination based upon the technical merits of the position. If
the more-likely-than- not threshold is met, a company must measure the tax position to determine the amount to recognize in the
financial statements. As a result of the implementation of this standard, the Company performed a review of its material
tax positions in accordance with recognition and measurement standards established by FASB ASC 740-10.
Deferred taxes are provided on a
liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit
carryforwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
differences between the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax basis. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in
the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
At December 31, 2013 the Company
had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $14,639,000 that may be offset against future taxable income through 2033.
No tax benefits have been reported in the financial statements, because the potential tax benefits of the net operating loss carry
forwards are offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.
Due to the change in ownership provisions
of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, net operating loss carryforwards for Federal income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual
limitations.
Should a change in ownership occur,
net operating loss carryforwards may be limited as to use in the future.
Net
deferred tax assets consist of the following components as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
NOL Carryover
|
|
$
|
6,250,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,245,000
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(6,250,000
|
)
|
|
|
(5,245,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
The actual provision for income
taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the federal statutory rate to losses before income taxes at December 31, 2013
and 2012, as follows:
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
Federal income taxes at statutory rate
|
|
|
(34
|
)%
|
|
|
(34
|
)%
|
State income tax, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
Permanent differences
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
42.7
|
%
|
|
|
42.7
|
%
|
The income tax provision differs
from the amount of income tax determined by applying the U.S. federal and state income tax rates of 34% to pretax income from continuing
operations for the years ended December 31, 2013and 2012 due to the following:
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
Current Federal Tax
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Current State Tax
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Change in NOL Benefit
|
|
|
1,005,000
|
|
|
|
566,000
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(1,005,000
|
)
|
|
|
(566,000
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
At December 31, 2013, the Company
had no unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate.
The Company did not have any
tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase
or decrease within the next 12 months.
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
The Company includes interest
and penalties arising from the underpayment of income taxes in the statements of operations in the provision for income taxes.
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had no accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
The tax years that remain subject
to examination by major taxing jurisdictions are those for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.
Certain amounts in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications have
no material affect on the consolidated financial statements.
Accrued expenses consisted of the
following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
$
|
28,672
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Misc. loans payable
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Accrued interest – related party
|
|
|
255,177
|
|
|
|
892,819
|
|
Accrued interest- on note payable
|
|
|
370,894
|
|
|
|
228,278
|
|
Accrued interest- on accounts payable
|
|
|
129,028
|
|
|
|
74,948
|
|
Total accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
788,771
|
|
|
$
|
1,196,045
|
|
|
l.
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
|
We have reviewed accounting pronouncements
issued during the past two years and have adopted any that are applicable to our company. We have determined that none had a material
impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
On January 1, 2008, the Company
adopted FASB ASC 820-10-50, “
Fair Value Measurements.
” This guidance defines fair value, establishes a
three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures.
The three levels are defined as follows:
- Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology
are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
- Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology
include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability,
either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
- Level 3 inputs to valuation methodology
are unobservable and significant to the fair measurement.
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
The carrying amounts reported in
the balance sheets for the cash and cash equivalents, receivables and current liabilities each qualify as financial instruments
and are a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and
their expected realization and their current market rate of interest.
The Company accounts for its stock
based compensation under ASC 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation” using the fair value based method. Under
this method, compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the service
period, which is usually the vesting period. This guidance establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an
entity exchanges it equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities
in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled
by the issuance of those equity instruments.
NOTE 5 - ACCOUNTS
RECEIVABLE
Accounts receivable
at December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follow:
|
|
2013
|
Accounts receivable(on acquisition)
|
|
$
|
698,000
|
|
|
|
698,000
|
Less: allowance on accounts receivable
|
|
|
(670,000)
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
28,000
|
|
|
2012
|
Accounts receivable (on acquisition)
|
|
$
|
850,000
|
|
|
|
850,000
|
Less:allowance on accounts receivable
|
|
|
(670,000)
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
180,000
|
The Company was involved in disputes with the above
accounts receivable and has filed a lawsuit (refer to note 15)
NOTE 6 - ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE
The accounts payable of
$826,832, as of December 31, 2013, includes two parties who are seeking motion for entry for final garnishment judgment, The
Company has assumed these two accounts payable with the acquisition of AFI (refer to note 3). Per court order interest is
calculated at rate of 6% per annum on $325,138 on one of the accounts payable and 18% on $211,471 of the second accounts
payable. Accrued interest of $129,028 has been accounted and accrued in accrued expenses.
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
NOTE 7 - NOTES PAYABLE
Notes payable consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2013
|
|
December 31,
2012
|
Notes payable, issued on May 6, 2011, unsecured, interest at 10%per annum, due on demand.
|
|
$
|
59,500
|
|
|
$
|
59,500
|
|
Notes payable, issued on August 25, 2010, unsecured, interest at 10%per
annum due on demand.
|
|
|
172,500
|
|
|
|
172,500
|
|
Notes payable issued on May 25, 2012, secured, interest at 6%per annum, due on November 14, 2012, is in default(1)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Notes payable issued on January 28, 2012 to individual, unsecured, interest included, due on demand.(2)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
610,000
|
|
Notes payable issued on October 18, 2010 to individual, unsecured, interest at 15% per annum, due on demand.(3)
|
|
|
786,300
|
|
|
|
786,300
|
|
Notes payable issued on October 5, 2013 to individual, unsecured, interest at 8% per annum, due on demand.
|
|
|
28,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Notes payable issued on October 17, 2013 to a company, unsecured, interest at 16% per annum, due on demand.
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Notes payable issued on March 5, 2013 to individual, unsecured, interest at 8% per annum, due on demand.
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Notes payable issued on July 1, 2013 to a company, unsecured, interest at 8% per annum, due on demand.
|
|
|
28,082
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Notes payable issued on October 4, 2013 to a company, unsecured, interest at 8% per annum, due on demand.
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes payable
|
|
|
1,093,382
|
|
|
|
1,678,300
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
(1,093,382
|
)
|
|
|
(1,678,300
|
)
|
Long-term notes payable
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Maturities of notes payable are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,093,382
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,093,382
|
|
Accrued interest on notes payable
for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $363,507 and $219,978, respectively.
|
1)
|
This note payable was guaranteed by one of the shareholder. In the
year 2012, the Company also issued 25,000 shares of Common stock as a consideration for the note which was fair valued at market
rate for $62,500 and charged to expenses. The $50,000 note and the accrued interest of $3,296 were converted to stock by issuance
of 580,000 shares of common stock of the Company during the year ended December 31, 2013
|
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
|
2)
|
This note payable was assumed on the acquisition of AFI. The original
owner of AFI has pledge 1.2 million shares of the Company in escrow account.. The note was converted to stock by issuance of 2,100,000
shares of common stock of the Company during the year ended December 31, 2013
|
|
3)
|
This Note payable was assumed on the acquisition of AFI. The Company
is negotiating a settlement agreement for $786,300, inclusive of all interest on the date of settlement.
|
NOTE 8 - CONVERTIBLE
DEBENTURE/NOTES PAYABLE
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
Notes payable issued on March 21, 2012, unsecured, interest included, due on March 21, 2014,convertible into common stock at $1.00 per share (less unamortized debt discount of $12,616 and $151,869 , respectively)
|
|
$
|
92,384
|
|
|
$
|
98,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible debenture issued on October 2, 2012, unsecured, interest included, due on October 2, 2015, convertible into common stock at 60% of the lowest closing bid price for the twenty trading days immediately preceding the date of conversion, (less unamortized debt discount of $0 and $110,137, respectively)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible note issued on March 2013, unsecured, interest at 8%, due on October 05, 2013, in default.
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible note issued on July 2013, August 2013 and October 2013, unsecured, interest at 8%, due on April 22, 2014, May 27, 2014 and July 25, 2014. Unamortized debt discount of $92,011 and $0, respectively
|
|
|
81,989
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible note issued on October 2013 and December 2013, unsecured, zero interest if paid on or before 90 days otherwise one time interest charge of 12%, due on October 2, 2015 and December 2, 2015. Unamortized debt discount of $50,082 and $0, respectively
|
|
|
4,918
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible note issued on October 2013, unsecured, interest at 6%, due on October 13, 2014. Unamortized debt discount of $23,507 and $0, respectively
|
|
|
6,493
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible note issued on December 2013, unsecured, interest at 8%, due on December 12, 2014. Unamortized debt discount of $58,299 and $0, respectively
|
|
|
3,201
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible note issued on December 2013, unsecured, interest at 6%, due on December 12, 2014. Unamortized debt discount of $100,317 and $0, respectively
|
|
|
32,183
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total notes payable
|
|
|
231,168
|
|
|
|
107,994
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
(4,918
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Long-term convertible debenture/notes payable
|
|
$
|
226,250
|
|
|
$
|
107,994
|
|
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
Convertible note issued March
21, 2012
On March 21, 2012, the Company issued
a $250,000 Convertible Promissory Note which is convertible into 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at the holder’s
option, at $1.00 per share.
In accordance with ASC 470-20, the
Company recognized an embedded beneficial conversion feature present in the note. The Company allocated a portion of the proceeds
equal to the intrinsic value of that feature to additional paid-in capital. The Company recognized and measured an aggregate of
$250,000 of the proceeds, which is equal to the intrinsic value of the embedded beneficial conversion feature, to additional paid-in
capital and a discount against the note. The debt discount attributed to the beneficial conversion feature is charged to current
period operations as interest expense using the effective interest method over the term of the note.
During the years ended December
31, 2013 and 2012, the Company amortized $139,252 and $98,131 current period operations as interest expense, respectively, inclusive
of debt discount amortization. In the year 2012 the holder of the promissory note made payments of $200,000 directly to vendors
of the Company for purchase of fuel and paid $50,000 directly to the Company. As part of the joint venture agreement the Company
has agreed to pay 50% of all the profits generated by all the fuel transactions in South Africa. As of December 31, 2012 the Company
has accounted and paid $48,153 to the joint venture partner
On December 12, 2013, the Note holder
assigned $145,000 of its note to another note holder (as mentioned below).
Convertible debenture issued
October 2, 2012
On October 2, 2012, the Company
issued a $120,000 Convertible Promissory Note which bears interest at a rate of 6% and is convertible into the Company’s
common stock at the holder’s option, at the conversion rate of60% of the lowest closing bid price for the twenty trading
days immediately preceding the date of conversion. The Company also issued 30,000 of shares along with Note which valued at market
rate for $75,000 and was charged to expenses. The Company received net $88,000 from the debenture holder and balance $32,000 were
paid towards the legal expenses and due diligence fees.
The Company identified embedded
derivatives related to the Convertible Promissory Note entered into on October 2, 2012.These embedded derivatives included certain
conversion features. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record the fair value
of the derivatives as of the inception date of the Convertible Promissory Note and to adjust the fair value as of each subsequent
balance sheet date. At the inception ofthe Convertible Promissory Note, the Company determined a fair value of $182,125 of the
embedded derivative. The fair value of the embedded derivative was determined using the Binomial Lattice Model based on the following
assumptions:
Dividend yield:
|
|
|
-0-
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
313.6
|
%
|
Risk free rate:
|
|
|
0.31
|
%
|
In the year 2012 the initial fair
value of the embedded debt derivative of $182,125 was allocated as a debt discount up to the proceeds of the note ($120,000) with
the remainder($62,125) charged to current period operations as interest expense.
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
On February 1, 2013, the Company
issued a $100,000 Convertible Promissory Note which bears interest at a rate of 6% and is convertible into the Company’s
common stock at the holder’s option, at the conversion rate of 60% of the lowest closing bid price for the twenty trading
days immediately preceding the date of conversion. The Company received net $90,000 from the debenture holder and balance $10,000
were paid towards the legal expenses.
The Company identified embedded
derivatives related to the Convertible Promissory Note entered into on February 1, 2013. These embedded derivatives included certain
conversion features. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record the fair value
of the derivatives as of the inception date of the Convertible Promissory Note and to adjust the fair value as of each subsequent
balance sheet date. At the inception of the Convertible Promissory Note, the Company determined a fair value of $206,062 of the
embedded derivative. The fair value of the embedded derivative was determined using the Binomial Lattice Model based on the following
assumptions:
Dividend yield:
|
|
|
-0-
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
313.6
|
%
|
Risk free rate:
|
|
|
0.31
|
%
|
The initial fair value of the embedded
debt derivative of $206,062 was allocated as a debt discount up to the proceeds of the note ($100,000) with the remainder ($106,062)
charged to current period operations as interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2013.
During the year ended December 31,
2013, the Company issued common stock for converting $142,000 of a convertible note payable by issuance of 4,081,788 shares of
common stock of the Company and the balance of the convertible note of $78,000 along with accrued interest of $7,795 was paid in
cash. Derivative liability as of date of conversion of $334,082 was transferred to additional paid in capital included in the value
of shares issued. Excess value of shares over the converted value of note for $24,235 was charged to non-cash interest expenses.
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the
Company adjusted the recorded fair value of the derivative liability to market on both notes resulting in non-cash, non-operating
gains of $137,570 and $0, respectively.
During the years ended December
31, 2013 and 2012, the Company amortized $210,137 and $9,863 to current period operations as interest expense, respectively.
Convertible debenture July 2013,
August 2013 and October 2013
On July 19, 2013, the Company issued
a $78,500 Convertible Promissory Note which bears interest at a rate of 8%, due on April 22, 2014 and is convertible into the Company’s
common stock at the holder’s option, at the conversion rate of 60% of the lowest three day trading price for ten trading
days immediately preceding the date of conversion. Any amount of principal or interest on this Note which is not paid when due
shall bear interest at the rate of twenty two percent (22%) per annum from the due date thereof until the same is paid (“Default
Interest”) and also has prepayment penalty clause.
On August 26, 2013, the Company
issued a $53,000 Convertible Promissory Note which bears interest at a rate of 8%, due on May 27, 2014 and is convertible into
the Company’s common stock at the holder’s option, at the conversion rate of 60% of the lowest three day trading price
for ten
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
trading days immediately preceding
the date of conversion. Any amount of principal or interest on this Note which is not paid when due shall bear interest at the
rate of twenty two percent (22%) per annum from the due date thereof until the same is paid (“Default Interest”) and
also has prepayment penalty clause.
On October 23, 2013, the Company
issued a $42,500 Convertible Promissory Note which bears interest at a rate of 8%, due on July 25, 2014 and is convertible into
the Company’s common stock at the holder’s option, at the conversion rate of 60% of the lowest three day trading price
for ten trading days immediately preceding the date of conversion. Any amount of principal or interest on this Note which is not
paid when due shall bear interest at the rate of twenty two percent (22%) per annum from the due date thereof until the same is
paid (“Default Interest”) and the note also has prepayment penalty clause.
The Company received a net of $135,000
from the debenture holder, $6,500 was paid towards the accrued legal expenses and due diligence fees, $7,500 toward legal and professional
fees and$25,000 was paid toward accrued professional fees.
The Company identified embedded
derivatives related to the Convertible Promissory Note entered into in July 2013, August 2013 and October 2013. These embedded
derivatives included certain conversion features. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the
Company record the fair value of the derivatives as of the inception date of the Convertible Promissory Note and to adjust the
fair value as of each subsequent balance sheet date. At the inception of the Convertible Promissory Note, the Company determined
a fair value of $395,144 of the embedded derivative. The fair value of the embedded derivative was determined using the
Binomial Lattice Model based on
the following assumptions:
Dividend yield:
|
|
|
-0-
|
%
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
243%-312
|
%
|
|
Risk free rate:
|
|
|
0.31
|
%
|
|
The initial fair value of the embedded debt derivative
of $395,144 was allocated as a debt discount up to the proceeds of the note ($174,000) with the remainder ($221,144) charged to
current period operations as non-cash interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2013.
The fair value of the described embedded derivative of
$227,069 at December 31, 2013 was determined using the Binomial Lattice Model with the following assumptions:
Dividend yield:
|
|
|
-0-
|
%
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
292.88
|
%
|
|
Risk free rate:
|
|
|
0.08% -0.11
|
%
|
|
At December 31, 2013, the Company adjusted the recorded
fair value of the derivative liability to market on both notes resulting in non-cash, non-operating gain of $118,075 for the year
ended December 31, 2013.
During the year ended December 31,
2013 and 2012, the Company amortized $81,989 and $-0-, respectively, of beneficial debt discount to the operations as interest
expense.
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
Convertible debenture March 2013
On March 05, 2013 the Company issued
a $10,000 Convertible Promissory Note against expenses incurred, which bears interest at a rate of 8%, payable on October 05, 2013
The Maker of this Note shall have option after the affected date (October 5, 2013), in its sole discretion, to convert all or part
of the principal balance and accrued interest on this Note to common stock of the Maker at a 40% discount of the average three
lowest trading days in the ten trading days previous to the conversion.
The Company analyzed the convertible
debts for derivative accounting consideration under ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” and determined that derivative
accounting is not applicable. The Company further analyzed the convertible debts for a beneficial conversion feature under ASC
470-20 on the date of the notes and determined that a beneficial conversion feature exists. The Note was in default during the
year ended December 31, 2013 and $5,000 was charged to interest expenses as penalty.
Convertible debenture October
2013 and December 2013
On October 2, 2013, the Company
issued a $35,000 Convertible Promissory Note which bears zero interest if paid on or before 90 days otherwise one time interest
charge of 12%, due on October 2, 2015 and is convertible into the Company’s common stock at the holder’s option, at
the conversion rate of 60% of the average of the lowest two day trading price for twenty five trading days immediately preceding
the date of conversion.
On December 9, 2013, the Company
issued a $20,000 Convertible Promissory Note which bears zero interest if paid on or before 90 days otherwise one time interest
charge of 12%, due on December 9, 2015 and is convertible into the Company’s common stock at the holder’s option, at
the conversion rate of 60% of the average of the lowest two day trading price for twenty five trading days immediately preceding
the date of conversion.
The Company identified
embedded derivatives related to the Convertible Promissory Note entered into in October 2013 and December 2013. These
embedded derivatives included certain conversion features. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments
requires that the Company record the fair value of the derivatives as of the inception date of the Convertible Promissory
Note and to adjust the fair value as of each subsequent balance sheet date. At the inception of the Convertible Promissory
Note, the Company determined a fair value of $108,910 of the embedded derivative. The fair value of the embedded derivative
was determined using the
Binomial Lattice Model based on
the following assumptions:
Dividend yield:
|
|
|
-0-
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
272%-277
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
Risk free rate:
|
|
|
0.30%-0.31
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
The initial fair value of the embedded
debt derivative of $108,910 was allocated as a debt discount up to the proceeds of the note ($55,000) with the remainder ($53,911)
charged to current period operations as non-cash interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2013.
The fair value of the described
embedded derivative of $112,688 at December 31, 2013 was determined using the Binomial Lattice Model with the following assumptions:
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
Dividend yield:
|
|
|
-0-
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
292.88
|
%
|
Risk free rate:
|
|
|
0.32
|
%
|
At December 31, 2013, the Company
adjusted the recorded fair value of the derivative liability to market on both notes resulting in non-cash, non-operating loss
of $3,778 for the year ended December 31, 2013.
During the year ended December 31,
2013 and 2012, the Company amortized $4,918 and $-0-, respectively, of beneficial debt discount to the operations as interest expense.
Convertible debenture October
2013
On October 13, 2013, the Company
issued a $30,000 Convertible Promissory Note which bears interest at a rate of 6%, due on October 13, 2014 and is convertible into
the Company’s common stock at the holder’s option, at the conversion rate of 60% of the lowest five prior trading days
immediately preceding the date of conversion. Default rate of interest is 24% per annum.
The Company received a net of $26,100
from the convertible note holder, $1,500 was paid towards the legal expenses and $2,400 toward third party fees.
The Company identified embedded
derivatives related to the Convertible Promissory Note entered into in October 2013. These embedded derivatives included certain
conversion features. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record the fair value
of the derivatives as of the inception date of the Convertible Promissory Note and to adjust the fair value as of each subsequent
balance sheet date. At the inception of the Convertible Promissory Note, the Company determined a fair value of $57,750 of the
embedded derivative. The fair value of the embedded derivative was determined using the
Binomial Lattice Model based on
the following assumptions:
Dividend yield:
|
|
|
-0-
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
277
|
%
|
Risk free rate:
|
|
|
0.14
|
%
|
The initial fair value of the embedded
debt derivative of $57,750 was allocated as a debt discount up to the proceeds of the note ($30,000) with the remainder ($27,750)
charged to current period operations as non-cash interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2013.
The fair value of the described
embedded derivative of $53,437 at December 31, 2013 was determined using the Binomial Lattice Model with the following assumptions:
Dividend yield:
|
|
|
-0-
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
292.88
|
%
|
Risk free rate:
|
|
|
0.12
|
%
|
At December 31, 2013, the Company
adjusted the recorded fair value of the derivative liability to market on both notes resulting in non-cash, non-operating gain
of $4,312 for the year ended December 31, 2013.
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
During the year ended December 31,
2013 and 2012, the Company amortized $6,493 and $-0-, respectively, of beneficial debt discount to the operations as interest expense.
Convertible debenture December
2013
On December 12, 2013, the Company
issued a $61,500 Convertible Promissory Note which bears interest at a rate of 8%, due on December 12, 2014 and is convertible
into the Company’s common stock at the holder’s option, at the conversion rate of 60% of the lowest three trading price
of ten prior trading days immediately preceding the date of conversion. Default rate of interest is 22% per annum.
The Company received a net of $58,500
from the convertible note holder and $3,000 was paid towards the legal expenses.
The Company identified embedded
derivatives related to the Convertible Promissory Note entered into in December 2013. These embedded derivatives included certain
conversion features. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record the fair value
of the derivatives as of the inception date of the Convertible Promissory Note and to adjust the fair value as of each subsequent
balance sheet date. At the inception of the Convertible Promissory Note, the Company determined a fair value of $92,841 of the
embedded derivative. The fair value of the embedded derivative was determined using the
Binomial Lattice Model based on the
following assumptions
:
Dividend yield:
|
|
|
-0-
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
272
|
%
|
Risk free rate:
|
|
|
0.14
|
%
|
The initial fair value of the embedded
debt derivative of $92,841 was allocated as a debt discount up to the proceeds of the note ($61,500) with the remainder ($31,341)
charged to current period operations as non-cash interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2013.
The fair value of the described
embedded derivative of $115,353 at December 31, 2013 was determined using the Binomial Lattice Model with the following assumptions:
Dividend yield:
|
|
|
-0-
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
292.88
|
%
|
Risk free rate:
|
|
|
0.13
|
%
|
At December 31, 2013, the Company
adjusted the recorded fair value of the derivative liability to market on both notes resulting in non-cash, non-operating loss
of $22,512 for the year ended December 31, 2013.
During the year ended December 31,
2013 and 2012, the Company amortized $3,201 and $-0-, respectively, of beneficial debt discount to the operations as interest expense.
Convertible debenture December
2013
On December 12, 2013 one of above
note holder assigned its Note of $145,000 to another holder, which bears interest at a rate of 8%, payable on December 12, 2014
and is convertible into the Company’s common stock at the holder’s option at 40% discount to the lowest trading price
in five
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
days
prior to date of notice of conversion. Additionally in no event the floor price for the exercise can't go below $0.00004. If these
notes are converted at this rate, the number of shares issued would be in excess of the authorized limit of share issuance. If
the Borrower is unable to issue any shares under this provision due to the fact that there is an insufficient number of authorized
and unissued shares available, the Holder promises not to force the Borrower to issue these shares or trigger an Event of Default,
provided that Borrower takes immediate steps required to get the appropriate level of approval from shareholders or the board of
directors, where applicable to raise the number of authorized shares to satisfy the Notice of Conversion. In the event of default
the Company has to pay 150% time the sum of outstanding principal and accrued interest. T
he
note also has prepayment penalty clause.
During the year 2013, the Company
issued 527,778 shares of company common stock in exchange of convertible note of $12,500.
The Company analyzed the convertible
debts for derivative accounting consideration under ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” and determined that derivative
accounting is not applicable. The Company further analyzed the convertible debts for a beneficial conversion feature under ASC
470-20 on the date of the notes and determined that a beneficial conversion feature exists. The intrinsic value of the beneficial
conversion feature was determined to be $116,483 and was recorded as debt discount. During the year ended December 31, 2013, debt
discount of $16,166 was amortized to interest expenses.
Maturities of notes payable are as follows:
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
Amount
|
|
2014
|
|
|
$
|
513,000
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
568,000
|
|
|
Less: Unamortized debt discount
|
|
|
|
(336,833
|
)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
231,167
|
|
Accrued interest on convertible
notes payable for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $7,387 and $8,300, respectively.
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
NOTE 9 - CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE - RELATED PARTIES
Convertible Notes payable - related parties
consist of the following
|
|
December 31,
2013
|
|
December 31,
2012
|
Convertible note issued on October 2013, unsecured, interest at 8%, due on demand.
|
|
$
|
17,000
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Convertible note issued on October 2013, unsecured, interest at 8%, due on demand.
|
|
|
194,254
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total convertible notes payable - related parties
|
|
|
211,254
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
(211,254
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Long-term convertible notes payable - related parties
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Convertible debenture October
2013
On
October 1, 2013 the Company issued a $17,000 Convertible Promissory Note against the accounts payable, which bears interest at
a rate of 10%, payable on demand and is convertible into the Company’s common stock at the holder’s option at 40% discount
to the lowest trading price in five days prior to date of notice of conversion. Additionally in no event the floor price for the
exercise can't go below $0.00004. If these notes are converted at this rate, the number of shares issued would be in excess of
the authorized limit of share issuance. If the Borrower is unable to issue any shares under this provision due to the fact that
there is an insufficient number of authorized and unissued shares available, the Holder promises not to force the Borrower to issue
these shares or trigger an Event of Default, provided that Borrower takes immediate steps required to get the appropriate level
of approval from shareholders or the board of directors, where applicable to raise the number of authorized shares to satisfy the
Notice of Conversion. In the event of default the Company has to pay 150% time the sum of outstanding principal and accrued interest.
The note also has prepayment penalty clause
.
The Company analyzed the convertible
debts for derivative accounting consideration under ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” and determined that derivative
accounting is not applicable. The Company further analyzed the convertible debts for a beneficial conversion feature under ASC
470-20 on the date of the notes and determined that a beneficial conversion feature exists. The intrinsic value of the beneficial
conversion feature was determined to be $15,692 and was recorded as debt discount. During the year ended December 31, 2013, debt
discount of $15,692 was amortized.
Convertible debenture October
1, 2013
On October 2013 the Company issued
a $194,254 Convertible Promissory Note against the account payable, which bears interest at a rate of 10%, payable on demand and
is convertible into the Company’s common stock at the holder’s option at 40% discount to the lowest trading price in
five days prior to date of notice of conversion. Additionally in no event the floor price for the exercise can't go below $0.00004.
If these notes are converted at this rate, the number of shares issued would be in excess of the authorized limit of share issuance.
If the Borrower is unable to issue any shares under this provision due to the fact that there is an insufficient number of authorized
and
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
unissued shares available, the Holder
promises not to force the Borrower to issue these shares or trigger an Event of Default, provided that Borrower takes immediate
steps required to get the appropriate level of approval from shareholders or the board of directors, where applicable to raise
the number of authorized shares to satisfy the Notice of Conversion. In the event of default the Company has to pay 150% time the
sum of outstanding principal and accrued interest. The note also has prepayment penalty clause.
The Company analyzed the convertible
debts for derivative accounting consideration under ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” and determined that derivative
accounting is not applicable. The Company further analyzed the convertible debts for a beneficial conversion feature under ASC
470-20 on the date of the notes and determined that a beneficial conversion feature exists. The intrinsic value of the beneficial
conversion feature was determined to be $179,312 and was recorded as debt discount. During the year ended December 31, 2013, debt
discount of $179,312 was amortized.
For the year ended December 31,
2013 and 2012, interest expenses charged on the above two note is $4,843 and $0, respectively. Accrued interest on convertible
notes payable – related parties for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $4,843and $0, respectively
NOTE 10 - NOTES PAYABLE - RELATED PARTIES
Notes payable - related parties consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2013
|
|
December 31,
2012
|
Note payable to a related individual, secured by tangible and intangible assets of the Company, interest at 16%, principal and interest due April 1, 2000, past due. Note is convertible into common stock of the Company at $0.10 per share. Note is in default (2)
|
|
$
|
1,087,370
|
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
Note payable to a related individual, interest at 8%,past due. Note is in default(1)
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
Notes payable to related individuals, unsecured, interest at 10%, due on demand. (3)
|
|
|
28,500
|
|
|
|
43,500
|
|
Total notes payable - related parties
|
|
|
2,115,870
|
|
|
|
1,493,500
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
(2,115,870
|
)
|
|
|
(1,493,500
|
)
|
Long-term notes payable - related parties
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Maturities of notes payable - related parties are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,115,870
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,115,870
|
|
Accrued interest on notes
payable – related parties for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $250,334 and $892,819, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, total interest expense to related party was $207,380 and $150,641,
respectively.
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
|
1)
|
This note was issued for the acquisition of
AFI on January 28, 2012. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had accrued interest on the note in the amount of $154,082
and $74,082, respectively.
|
|
2)
|
This note was originally issued for $450,000.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the principle value of $450,000 along with accrued interest of $837,370 was converted
to two new notes for $1,087,370 and $200,000. The Company issued 2,100,000 shares of the common stock against settlement of the
new note of $200,000 from above.
|
|
3)
|
During the year ended December 31, 2013, one
of the note holder for $15,000 along with accrued interest of $13,300 transferred its loan to a non- related party. During the
year 2013 itself the Company issued 1,800,000 shares of the common stock to settle $28,300 of note of non- related party.
|
NOTE 11 - COMMON AND PREFERRED STOCK TRANSACTIONS
Preferred Stock
The Company is authorized
to issue 200 preferred shares of $0.0001 par value. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012 the Company has 200 shares of preferred
stock as issued and outstanding. Although the preferred stock carries no dividend, distribution, liquidation or conversion
rights, each share of preferred stock carries ten million (10,000,000) votes and holders of our preferred stock are able to
vote together with our common stockholders on all matters. Consequently, the holder of our preferred stock is able to
unilaterally control the election of our board of directors and, ultimately, the direction of our Company.
Common stock
The Company is authorized
to issue 50,000,000 shares of $0.0001 par value of common stock. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012 the Company had 37,709,552
and 15,216,848 shares of common stock as issued and outstanding.
During the year ended
December 31, 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of 7,400,000 shares of common stock for acquisition of AFI (refer to note
3). The fair value of the stock on the dates of issuance was arrived at $3,774,000 and was part of the purchase price
consideration.
During the year ended
December 31, 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of 490,000 shares of common stock to various contract personnel for
services provided. The market value of the stock on the dates of issuance was $1,219,500 and charged to statements of
operations.
During the year ended
December 31, 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,040,551 shares of common stock to two accredited investors in private
transactions as payment for services rendered during the year. The market value of the stock on the dates of issuance was
$5,101,378 and was charged to statements of operations.
During the year ended
December 31, 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,063,550 shares of common stock for acquisition of interest in AFI
South Africa, LLC (AFI SA) (refer to note 3). The market value of the stock on the dates of issuance was $5,158,875 and
charged to statements of operations.
During the year ended December
31, 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of 55,000, shares of common stock to note holder. The market value of the stock on the
dates of issuance was $137,500 and charged to finance expenses.
During the year ended December
31, 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 8,586,102 shares of common stock to various contract personnel for services provided.
The market value of the stock on the dates of issuance was $1,538,349 and charged to statements of operations.
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
During the year ended December
31, 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 11,189,566 shares of common stock for the conversion of debt and accrued interest
of $1,380,179 and $24,235 was charged to expenses for excess value of shares issued over the value of converted note.
During the year ended December
31, 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 700,000 shares of common stock for the conversion of accrued expenses of $70,000.
During the year ended December
31, 2013, the Company sold an aggregate of 2,017,036 shares of common stock for cash in the amount of $142,193.
NOTE 12 - OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
The
Company has adopted FASB ASC 718, “Share-Based Payments” (“ASC 718”) to account for its stock options.
The Company estimates the fair value of each stock award at the grant date by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The
assumptions used to calculate the fair value of options granted are evaluated and revised, as necessary, to reflect market conditions
and our experience. Compensation expense is recognized only for those options expect to vest, with forfeitures estimated at the
date of grant based on our historical experience and future expectations.
The following table summarizes the
changes in options outstanding issued to employees of the Company:
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|
Outstanding as of January 1, 2012
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
2,670,000
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
|
(2,600,000
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
1.65
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
370,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.34
|
|
Common stock options outstanding and exercisable
as of December, 2013 are:
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
Expiration
Date
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Number shares outstanding
|
|
Weighted Average Contractual Life (Years)
|
|
Number Exercisable
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2018
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
4.75
|
|
|
|
58,333
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
January 2, 2019
|
|
|
1.65
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
143,630
|
|
|
$
|
1.65
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
During the year
ended December 31, 2012, the Company granted 2,250,000 stock options with an exercise price of $0.01 out of which
1,250,000 was immediately vested and balance vesting over three years and expiring ten years from issuance. 1,250,000 of the
options were immediately cancelled by the board due to termination of the officer and the balance of 1,000,000 was
automatically canceled due to termination by clause. Hence no fair valuation was done by the company on the vested
portion.
During the year ended December 31,
2012, the Company granted 350,000 stock options with an exercise price of $0.01 vesting over three years and expiring ten years
from issuance. These options were immediately cancelled by the board and instead 150,000 shares of Company common stock were
issued which were fair valued at market rate and charged to expenses.
During the year ended
December 31, 2012, the Company granted 70,000 stock options to consultant with an exercise price of $0.01 and expiring
ten years from issuance. Out of these options 50,000 were immediately vested and 20,000 were vested over the period of three
years.
On January 28, 2013, pursuant
to its 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, the Company issued 150,000 common stock purchase options to each of their directors at an
exercise price of $1.65 per share. Out of which 75,000 were immediately vested and balance vesting over three years and
expiring six years from issuance date.
The
fair value of the vested portion (determined as described below) of $249,643 and $123,988 was charged to expenses and additional
paid in capital during the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively
.
The
fair value of these stock options granted and the significant assumptions used to determine those fair values, using a Black-Scholes
option-pricing model are as follows
:
Significant assumptions:
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate at grant date
|
|
|
1.04%-0.89
|
%
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
199.38%-344.22
|
%
|
Expected dividend payout
|
|
|
—
|
|
Expected option life-years
|
|
|
6
|
|
NOTE 13 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
From time to time, an
officer of the Company and an entity they owns paid for expenses of the Company for which he has not been reimbursed.
These unreimbursed expenses are disclosed as due to related parties. The balance due at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was
$56,973 and $104,254, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2013 the Company has charged $159,000 for service
rendered by officers. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company issued 50,000 shares for service rendered by the
officer which was fair valued at market rate for $4,500.
During the year ended December 31,
2012 the Company sold fuel to a previous partner in a joint venture who converted their interest in the joint venture to stock
of the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded sales to this party in the amount of $1,034,180.
During the year ended December
31, 2013 and 2012, the Company issued 3,539,046 and 1,826,622 shares to a major shareholder and Vice President of Sales of the
Company, for services rendered to the Company regarding business in South Africa which was fair valued at market rate for $247,733
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
and $4,566,555, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, this shareholder was also paid $162,600 and $67,500, respectively, as salary
which has been recorded in the statement of operations. No formal compensation agreement has been memorialized for this shareholder.
NOTE 14 - FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
ASC 825-10 defines fair value as
the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted
to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers
assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions,
and risk of nonperformance. ASC 825-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 825-10 establishes three levels of inputs that
may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 - Quoted prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 - Observable inputs other
than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume
or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or
can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs to
the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of fair value of assets or liabilities.
To the extent that valuation is
based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more
judgment. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In
such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is disclosed
is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Items recorded or measured at fair
value on a recurring basis in the accompanying consolidated financial statements consisted of the following items as of December
31, 2013:
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013 using:
|
|
|
December 31,
2013
|
|
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
|
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
558,548
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
558,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The debt derivative and
warrant liabilities are measured at fair value using quoted market prices and estimated volatility factors based on historical
prices for the Company’s common stock and are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
The following table provides a summary
of changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:
|
|
Debt Derivative
Liability
|
Balance, December 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Initial fair value of debt derivatives at note issuances
|
|
|
182,124
|
|
Extinguished derivative liability
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mark-to-market at December 31, 2012-Embedded debt derivatives
|
|
|
83,464
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2012
|
|
$
|
265,589
|
|
Initial fair value of debt derivatives at note issuances
|
|
|
860,708
|
|
Extinguished derivative liability
|
|
|
(334,082
|
)
|
Mark-to-market at December 31, 2013-Embedded debt derivatives
|
|
|
(233,667
|
)
|
Balance, December 31, 2013
|
|
$
|
558,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain for the period included in earnings relating to the liabilities held at December 31, 2013
|
|
$
|
233,667
|
|
Level 3 Liabilities are comprised
of our bifurcated convertible debt features on Companies our convertible notes.
NOTE 15 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
The Company is subject to certain
legal proceedings and claims, which arise in the ordinary course of its business. Although occasional adverse decisions or settlements
may occur, the Company believes that the final disposition of such matters should not have a material adverse effect on its financial
position or results of operations.
Ryan International Airlines
.
One of the Companies subsidiaries,
Aviation Fuel International ("AFI") is involved in disputes with two airlines: Ryan International Airlines, LLC ("Ryan")
and Direct Air. Both aviation fuel customers litigation arise out of disputed amounts for the delivery of Jet Fuel. Disagreements
between the parties resulted in both parties filing separate lawsuits in three actions. Ryan filed a cause of action in Case No.
09-57580,
Ryan International Airlines, Inc. v. Aviation Flight Services, LLC (“AFS”) and Aviation Fuel International,
Inc., (“AFI”)
, and sought recovery of $1,491,308.66 allegedly paid to AFS as pre-payment of aviation fuel and flight
services under a contractual relationship between Ryan and AFS. AFI moved to dismiss the action, to which, Ryan has subsequently
filed a notice of removal to the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Bankruptcy Division Case No.: 12-80802.
AFI filed an action for breach of contract for Ryan’s failure to pay certain Jet Fuel invoices for the delivery of fuel in
the amount of $678,000;
Aviation Fuel International v. Ryan International Airlines, Inc., a Kansas corporation, Wells Fargo
Bank Northwest, Trustee N.A., a Utah corporation, RUBLOFF 757-MSN24794LLC, an Illinois limited liability company, RYAN 767 LLC,
an Illinois limited liability company, AFT TRUST SUB I, a Delaware corporation, RYAN 767 N123 LLC, an Illinois limited liability
company, and RUBLOFF 440 LLC, an Illinois corporation
, Civil Action Case No. CACE 10-037788-04. AFI also filed the corresponding
claims of liens under the FAA Aircraft Registration Branch, for each plane, registered and tail wing number listed therein. This
action has also been recently noticed for been
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
removal to the Federal District
Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Bankruptcy Division Case No.: 12-80802. In addition, as a result of Ryan’s filing
a Federal Involuntary Bankruptcy Petition against Aviation Flight Services (“AFS”) on June 10, 2010, Case No.: 10-27313-JKO,
(S.D. of Fla.), our subsidiary AFI, also filed and was discharged as a creditor in the amount of $269,000.
Southern Sky Air Tours, d/b/a
Myrtle Beach Direct Air and Tours (Direct Air)
.
On or about March 13, 2012,
Southern Sky Air Tours, d/b/a Myrtle Beach Direct Air and Tours (“Direct Air”) ― a public charter operator
― ceased operations. Direct Air has subsequently filed for bankruptcy protection in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts (Worcester)(Case no. 12-40944). The Direct Air currently has $122,000 in cash in escrow with
Suntrust Bank, representing a partial payment by Direct Air for Fuel. This amount was unrecorded in the Company’s
financial statements because it has been challenged by the debtor and has been sequestered by the bankruptcy court in the
proceeding. This action is currently pending before the court, as it relates to the collection of the garnishment.
As a result of the non-payment for
jet fuel by AFI customers, certain of AFI’s suppliers have filed actions that have resulted in judgment and garnishments,
in the amount of $330,000. Most of these outstanding fuel delivery charges are secured in, and being challenged through, the Bankruptcy
action through the lien filings by both the issuer and individual fuel providers. In addition, AFI incurred certain loan and debt
obligations for which the Company are attempting to convert into our common stock.
Julian Manuel Leyva and Gabriel
Leyva
.
On June 8, 2012, Julian Manuel Leyva
and Gabriel Leyva (collectively, the “Leyvas”) filed a lawsuit in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County,
Florida, against us, our subsidiary AFI, and various others, alleging various claims in connection with efforts to collect sums
allegedly loaned to AFI between September 24, 2009 through February 11, 2011. The Leyvas are seeking damages of $570,000 plus interest
in addition to additional damages from other parties to the lawsuit. $610,000 has been accounted as payable under note payable.
During the year 2013 the Company issued 2,100,000 shares of common stock for settlement of $610,000.
Russell Adler
.
On January 11, 2013, Russell Adler,
our former Chief Executive Officer, filed a cross-complaint against the Company, AFI, and other associated persons in the Seventeenth
Judicial District Court, Broward
County, Florida. Mr. Adler’s complaint alleges various causes of action, including indemnification from the Company in respect
of litigation involving the Leyvas described above, damages for breach of Mr. Adler’s employment contract, fraud, unpaid
legal fees, unjust enrichment, and quantum meruit. The Company believe Mr. Adler’s claims are without merit and intend to
defend the same.
From time to time, the Company is
also a party to certain legal proceedings incidental to the normal course of our business including the enforcement of our rights
under contracts with purchasers and suppliers of fuel. While the outcome of these legal proceedings cannot at this time be predicted
with certainty, we do not expect that these proceedings will have a material effect upon its consolidated financial condition or
results of operations.
Lease Commitments
The Company’s headquarters
is located in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Many administrative functions such as accounting and legal are performed in an office in
Draper, UT.
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
Future minimum lease and related payments are
as follows:
2014
|
|
$
|
46,025
|
|
2015
|
|
-
|
|
2016
|
|
-
|
|
2017 and after
|
|
-
|
|
The Company’s main office
is located in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The lease had a term of 12 months, which began on August 1, 2012 and expires on July 31,
2014. The Company currently pays rent and related costs of approximately $6,575 per month.
There is no lease obligation in
its administrative office in Draper, Utah.
NOTE 16 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On January 13, 2014, the Company
issued an aggregate of 2,859,067 shares of its common stock to certain consulting personnel for services provided.
On January 14, 2014, the Company
converted into 1,660,026 shares of common stock, a portion of a loan originally received by the Company on March 21, 2012.
On January 22, 2014, the Company
issued a convertible note. The net proceeds of the Note were used to redeem and retire two 8% convertible notes that were issued
to Asher Enterprises, Inc. in the aggregate principal amount of $131,500.
On January 29, 2014, the Company
converted into 1,166,667 shares of common stock, a portion of a loan originally received by the Company on March 21, 2012.
On February 10, 2014, the Company
converted into 1,237,624 shares of common stock, a portion of a loan originally received by the Company on March 21, 2012.
On February 10, 2014, the Board
of Directors of the Company approved an amendment and restatement of the Certificate of Designation to the Company’s Certificate
of Incorporation. The Certificate of Designation concerns the rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions of Series “A”
Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Stock”). The amended and restated Certificate of Designation has increased the conversion
rights applicable to each share of Preferred Stock from ten million (10,000,000) to twenty million (20,000,000).
On February 10, 2014,
in connection with action taken by our board of directors and the holders of a majority in interest of our voting capital stock,
we effected a restatement of our Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of our common stock from
150,000,000 to 300,000,000.
On February 18, 2014, the Company
converted into 1,470,588 shares of common stock, a portion of a loan originally received by the Company on March 21, 2012.
On March 3, 2014, the Company issued
1,000,000 shares of its common stock to a consultant for services provided.
FUELSTREAM, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
On March 4, 2014, the Company converted
into 2,083,333 shares of common stock, a portion of a loan originally received by the Company on March 21, 2012.
PROSPECTUS
FUELSTREAM, INC.
UP TO 42,505,433 SHARES OF
COMMON STOCK
TO BE SOLD BY A CURRENT SECURITY HOLDER
We have not authorized any dealer, salesperson
or other person to give you written information other than this prospectus or to make representations as to matters not stated
in this prospectus. You must not rely on unauthorized information. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities or
a solicitation of your offer to buy the securities in any jurisdiction where that would not be permitted or legal. Neither the
delivery of this prospectus nor any sales made hereunder after the date of this prospectus shall create an implication that the
information contained herein nor the affairs of the issuer have not changed since the date hereof.
Until July __, 2014 (90 days after the date
of this prospectus), all dealers that effect transactions in these shares of common stock may be required to deliver a prospectus.
This is in addition to the dealer’s obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with respect to
their unsold allotments or subscriptions.
THE DATE OF THIS PROSPECTUS IS MAY __, 2014
PART II – INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED
IN PROSPECTUS
Item 13. Other Expenses and Issuance and Distribution
The expenses payable
by the Registrant in connection with the issuance and distribution of the securities being registered (other than underwriting
discounts and commissions, if any) are set forth below. Each item listed is estimated, except for the Securities and Exchange Commission
registration fee.
Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee
|
|
$
|
43.80
|
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
|
25,000.00
|
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
|
5,000.00
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
1,000.00
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
$
|
31,043.80
|
|
Item 14. Indemnification of Directors and Officers
Pursuant to our charter
and under the General Corporate Law of Delaware, our directors are not liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for
breach of fiduciary duty, except for liability in connection with a breach of duty of loyalty, for acts or omissions not in good
faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, for authorization of illegal dividend payments or
stock redemptions under Delaware law or any transaction from which a director has derived an improper personal benefit. Our charter
provides that we are authorized to provide indemnification of (and advancement of expenses) to directors, officers, employees and
agents of the Company (and any other persons to which applicable law permits the Company to provide indemnification) through by-law
provisions, agreements with such persons, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors, or otherwise, to the fullest extent
permitted by applicable law.
The Company has previously
entered into indemnification agreements with each of its current directors and officers. The indemnification agreement indemnifies
the indemnitee to the fullest extent permitted by law, including against third-party claims and claims by or in right of the Company
or any subsidiary or majority-owned partnership of the Company by reason of that person (including the advancement of expenses
subject to certain conditions) (a) being a director, officer employee or agent of the Company, or of any subsidiary or majority-owned
partnership of the Company or (b) serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer, employee or agent of another
entity. If appropriate, the Company is entitled to assume the defense of the claim with counsel selected by the Company and approved
by the indemnitee (which approval may not be unreasonably withheld). Separate counsel employed by the indemnitee will be at his
or her own expense unless (1) the employment of separate counsel has been previously authorized by the Company, (2) the
indemnitee reasonably concludes there may be a conflict of interest, or (3) the Company has not, in fact, employed counsel
to assume the defense of such claim.
Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
On May 28, 2010, the Company
issued 500,000 shares of restricted common stock to its then-Chief Executive Officer.
On April 29, 2011, the
Company issued 35,000 shares of restricted common stock to 4 persons for services rendered.
On September 16, 2011,
the Company issued 333,334 shares of restricted common stock to a consultant for services rendered.
On October 4, 2011, the
Company issued 550,000 shares of restricted common stock to 2 persons for services rendered.
On December 16, 2011, the
Company converted approximately $1.7 million in various debts of the Company in exchange for an aggregate of 891,667 shares of
restricted common stock, issued to 3 persons.
On December 16, 2011 the
Company issued 716,667 shares of restricted common stock to various service providers, including 500,000 shares of common stock
to its then-Chief Executive Officer.
On January 18, 2012, in
connection with the completion of the acquisition of Aviation Fuel International, Inc. (“AFI”), the Company issued
7,400,000 shares of common stock to Sean Wagner, the sole shareholder of AFI.
On September 7, 2012, pursuant
to the Company’s 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (“Board”) approved the grant
of 2,670,000 common stock purchase options (collectively, the “Options”) to 5 individuals at an exercise price of $0.01
per share. Only 840,000 of the Options are vested with 740,000 of such vested Options being issued to Mr. Russell Adler, former
Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The remaining 2,245,000 Options are unvested and are subject to various performance criteria
as set forth in the individual consulting and employment agreements with such option holders. The Board has subsequently canceled
2,600,000 of the options and has amended the grant date of the remaining 70,000 options to October 1, 2012.
On September 10, 2012,
the Company issued an aggregate of 290,000 shares of restricted common stock to 4 persons for services rendered.
On September 10, 2012,
the Company issued an aggregate of 2,063,550 shares of restricted common stock to its joint venture partners in AFI South Africa,
LLC to convert their joint venture interest into shares of the Company.
On October 2, 2012, the
Company issued the a convertible debenture in the principal amount of $120,000 to Peak One Opportunity Fund, L.P. (“Peak
One”).
On October 5, 2012, the
Company issued an aggregate of 150,000 restricted shares of unregistered common stock to two former employees of the Company.
On October 16, 2012, the
Company issued an aggregate of 2,040,551 restricted shares of unregistered common stock to two accredited investors in private
transactions as payment for services rendered during 2012.
On January 28, 2013, we
issued an aggregate of 49,951 shares of common stock to employees and consultants of the Company. Also on January 28, 2013, pursuant
to our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, we issued 150,000 common stock purchase options to each of our directors at an exercise price
of $1.65 per share.
On February 1, 2013, the
Company issued a convertible debenture in the principal amount of $100,000 to Peak One.
On May 31, 2013, the Company
issued an aggregate of 254,000 shares of its common stock to certain consulting personnel for services provided.
On July 16, 2013, the Company
issued 2,352,230 shares of its common stock to Peak One in connection with the conversion of a debenture issued by the Company
to Peak One in October 2012.
On July 30, 2013, the Company
issued 75,000 shares of its common stock to a consultant of the Company for services provided.
On August 5, 2013, the
Company issued 2,017,036 shares of unregistered common stock to an accredited investor in exchange for cash.
On August 6, 2013, the
Company issued 1,729,558 shares of its common stock to Peak One.
On August 20, 2013, the
Company issued an aggregate of 531,438 shares of its common stock to certain employees and consulting personnel for services provided.
On August 29, 2013, the
Company entered into a Settlement Agreement with a certain creditor and agreed to convert various loans and promissory notes in
the collective amount of $933,000 into an aggregate of 5,480,000 shares of common stock of the Company.
On October 23, 2013, the
Company issued an aggregate of 2,100,000 shares of its common stock to officers and directors, and certain consulting personnel
for services provided.
On October 30, 2013, pursuant
to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Company issued an additional 500,000 shares of common stock of the Company.
On November 20, 2013, the
Company issued an aggregate of 5,075,713 shares of its common stock to certain employees and contract personnel for services provided.
On November 21, 2013, the
Company converted into 1,800,000 shares of common stock a certain promissory note originally issued by the Company on December
7, 2004.
On December 16, 2013, the
Company converted into 250,000 shares of common stock, a portion of a loan originally received by the Company on March 21, 2012.
On December 30, 2013, the
Company converted into 277,778 shares of common stock, a portion of a loan originally received by the Company on March 21, 2012.
On January 13, 2014, the
Company issued an aggregate of 2,859,067 shares of its common stock to certain consulting personnel for services provided.
On January 14, 2014, the
Company converted into 1,660,026 shares of common stock, a portion of a loan originally received by the Company on March 21, 2012.
On January 22, 2014, the
Company issued the Note, the terms of which are more particularly described in
Summary of Convertible Note Terms and Other Transactions
with the Selling Stockholder
on page 27 herein. The net proceeds of the Note were used to redeem and retire two 8% convertible
notes that were issued to Asher Enterprises, Inc. in the aggregate principal amount of $131,500 (hereafter, collectively, the “Asher
Notes”) The Asher Notes were issued on July 19th, 2013 and August 26th, 2013.
On January 29, 2014, the
Company converted into 1,166,667 shares of common stock, a portion of a loan originally received by the Company on March 21, 2012.
On February 10, 2014, the
Company converted into 1,237,624 shares of common stock, a portion of a loan originally received by the Company on March 21, 2012.
On February 18, 2014, the
Company converted into 1,470,588 shares of common stock, a portion of a loan originally received by the Company on March 21, 2012.
On March 3, 2014, the Company
issued 1,000,000 shares of its common stock to a consultant of the Company for services provided.
On March 4, 2014, the Company
converted into 2,083,333 shares of common stock, a portion of a loan originally received by the Company on March 21, 2012.
On March 17, 2014, the
Company converted into 2,210,884 shares of common stock, a portion of a loan originally received by the Company on March 21, 2012.
On March 21, 2014, the
Company issued 1,200,000 shares of its common stock to a consultant of the Company for services provided.
On March 31, 2014, the
Company converted into 2,529,762 shares of common stock, a portion of a loan originally received by the Company on March 21, 2012.
On April 1, 2014, the Company
converted into 744,048 shares of common stock, a portion of a certain convertible promissory note originally issued by the Company
on October 1, 2014.
On April 8, 2014, the Company
converted into 1,070,205 shares of common stock, a portion of a certain convertible promissory note originally issued by the Company
on October 1, 2014.
On April 9, 2014, the Company
converted into 3,656,379 shares of common stock, a portion of a loan originally received by the Company on March 21, 2012.
With respect to the transactions
noted above. Each of the recipients of securities of the Company was an accredited investor, or is considered by the Company to
be a “sophisticated person”, inasmuch as each of them has such knowledge and experience in financial and business matters
that they are capable of evaluating the merits and risks of receiving securities of the Company. No solicitation was made and no
underwriting discounts were given or paid in connection with these transactions. The Company believes that the issuance of its
securities as described above was exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 4(2)
of the Securities Act of 1933.
Item. 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Description
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2014).
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 17, 2011).
|
5.1
|
|
Opinion of Kenneth I. Denos, P.C
.
|
10.1
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on September 18, 2012).
|
10.2
|
|
2012 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on September 18, 2012).
|
10.3
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement between the Registrant and Magna Group, L.L.P., dated January 22, 2014 (including exhibits)
.
|
10.4
|
|
Assignment Agreement between Kass Promotions, Inc. and Magna Group, LLC and Fuelstream, Inc., dated December 12, 2013
.
|
13.1
|
|
The Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2014).
|
14.1
|
|
Code of Ethics for the Registrant
.
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
.
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of RBSM LLP
.
|
Item 17. Undertakings
Undertakings of the Registrant
The Registrant hereby undertakes:
(1) To file, during
any period in which offers or sales of securities are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement to:
(i) Include any
prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”);
(ii) To reflect
in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective
amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the
registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar
value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated
maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) (Sec.230.424(b)
of this chapter) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate
offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement.
(iii) To include
any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any
material change to such information in the registration statement;
(2) That, for the purpose
of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration
statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the
initial bona fide offering thereof.
(3) To remove from registration
by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.
(4) That, for the purpose
of determining liability under the Securities Act to any purchaser:
(i) If the registrant
is subject to Rule 430C, each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering,
other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed
to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided, however,
that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document
incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration
statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that
was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately
prior to such date of first use.
(5) That, for the purpose
of determining liability of the registrant under the Securities Act to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities:
The undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration
statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or
sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser
and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:
(i) Any preliminary
prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424;
(ii) Any free
writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the
undersigned registrant;
(iii) The portion
of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned registrant
or our securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and
(iv) Any other
communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.
Limitation of Liability of Directors and
Officers; Indemnification and Advance of Expenses
Pursuant to our charter
and under the General Corporation Law of Delaware (hereafter, the “DGCL”), our directors are not liable to us or our
stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty, except for liability in connection with a breach of duty of loyalty,
for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, for authorization
of illegal dividend payments or stock redemptions under Delaware law or any transaction from which a director has derived an improper
personal benefit. Our charter provides that we are authorized to provide indemnification of (and advancement of expenses) to our
directors, officers, employees and agents (and any other persons to which applicable law permits us to provide indemnification)
through Bylaw provisions, agreements with such persons, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors, or otherwise, to the fullest
extent permitted by applicable law.
We have previously entered
into indemnification agreements with certain of our current directors and officers. The indemnification agreement indemnifies the
indemnitee to the fullest extent permitted by law, including against third-party claims and claims by or in right of the Company
or any subsidiary or majority-owned partnership of the Company by reason of that person (including the advancement of expenses
subject to certain conditions) (a) being a director, officer employee or agent of the Company, or of any subsidiary or majority-owned
partnership of the Company or (b) serving at our request as a director, officer, employee or agent of another entity. If appropriate,
we are entitled to assume the defense of the claim with counsel selected by us and approved by the indemnitee (which approval may
not be unreasonably withheld). Separate counsel employed by the indemnitee will be at his or her own expense unless (1) the employment
of separate counsel has been previously authorized by us, (2) the indemnitee reasonably concludes there may be a conflict of interest
or (3) we have not, in fact, employed counsel to assume the defense of such claim.
Disclosure of Commission Position on Indemnification
for Securities Act Liabilities
Insofar as indemnification
for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling persons pursuant to
the provisions above, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and is, therefore, unenforceable.
In the event that a claim
for indemnification against such liabilities, other than the payment by us of expenses incurred or paid by one of our directors,
officers, or controlling persons in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding, is asserted by one of our directors,
officers, or controlling persons in connection with the securities being registered, we will, unless in the opinion of our counsel
the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification
is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and we will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.