UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
ý
|
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
OR
o
|
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the
Transition period from
to
Commission File Number: 001-31569
CANTERBURY PARK HOLDING CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Minnesota
|
|
41-1775532
|
(State or Other
Jurisdiction
of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
1100
Canterbury Road
Shakopee, MN 55379
(Address of
principal executive offices and zip code)
Registrants
telephone number, including area code:
(952) 445-7223
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common
Stock, $.01 par value
|
|
American
Stock Exchange
|
Title of Each
Class
|
|
Name of Exchange
on which Registered
|
Indicate by check mark if
the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act.
Indicate by check mark if
the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of
the Act.
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark if
disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
|
Large accelerated filer
|
o
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
o
|
|
|
Accelerated filer
|
o
|
Smaller reporting company
|
x
|
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange
Act Rule 12b-2).
The aggregate market
value of the shares of voting and non-voting common equity held by
non-affiliates based on the price at which the Companys common stock was last
sold on the American Stock Exchange, on June 30, 2007, the last business
day of the registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter was
approximately $31,410,000.
On March 14, 2008,
the Company had 4,122,285 shares of common stock, $.01 par value, outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Companys
definitive Proxy Statement for its 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be
held on June 5, 2008, are incorporated by reference into Part III of
this Form 10-K.
CANTERBURY PARK HOLDING CORPORATION
FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Item
1.
BUSINESS
(a) General
Development of the Business
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (the Company)
conducts pari-mutuel wagering operations and hosts unbanked card games at its
Canterbury Park Racetrack and Card Club facility (the Racetrack) in Shakopee,
Minnesota. The Companys pari-mutuel
wagering operations include both wagering on live thoroughbred and quarter
horse races at the Racetrack and wagering on races held at out-of-state
racetracks that are televised simultaneously at the Racetrack (simulcasting). Unbanked card games, in which patrons compete
against each other, are hosted in the Card Club at the Racetrack. The Company also derives revenues from
related services and activities, such as concessions, parking, advertising,
admissions, programs, a recreational vehicle park and from other entertainment
events held at the Racetrack.
The
Company was incorporated under the laws of Minnesota on March 24, 1994,
acquired the Racetrack on March 29, 1994, commenced seven day a week
simulcast operations on May 6, 1994, and, beginning in May 1995, launched
live horse racing and related pari-mutuel wagering on a seasonal basis,
generally from early May to early September. The Company opened the Card Club on April 19,
2000 with 43 tables and expanded to 50 tables (the maximum permitted by law) in
2001. The ownership and operation of the
Racetrack and the Card Club are significantly regulated by the Minnesota Racing
Commission (the MRC).
The
Company maintains a website at www.canterburypark.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, our
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and our periodic reports on Form 8-K
(and any amendments to these reports) are available free of charge on our
website.
(b) Financial Information About Segments
The
Company divides its business into three segments: horse racing, card club and
concessions. The horse racing segment represents simulcast and live racing
operations. The card club segment
represents operations of the Card Club, and the concessions segment represents
food and beverage services for simulcast and live racing, the Card Club and
during special events. Further information regarding the Companys business
segments is set forth in Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements under Item 8 of this Form 10-K, and such information is
incorporated herein by reference.
(c) Narrative Description of Business
(i)
Horse Racing Operations
The Companys horse racing operations consist of
year-round pari-mutuel wagering on simulcast horse races (simulcasting) and
live thoroughbred and quarter horse races (live meets) held on a seasonal
basis beginning in May and concluding in September.
Live Racing.
In 2007, the Racetrack hosted 68 days of live racing
beginning May 5th and concluding September 3rd. The meet included 45 days of mixed
thoroughbred and quarter horse racing and 23
days
of thoroughbred only racing. The 2006
live meet was also 68 days long, beginning May 6th and ending September 4th,
and consisted of 44 days of mixed thoroughbred and quarter horse racing and 24
days of thoroughbred only racing.
Currently, Minnesota law
requires the Racetrack to schedule a minimum of 125 days of live racing
annually, unless the Minnesota Horsemens Benevolent and Protective Association
(the MHBPA) agrees to a lesser number of live racing days. Since 1995, the MHBPA has agreed to waive the
125-day requirement and has allowed the Company to run a live meet of at least
50 days each year. After 2008, no
assurance can be given that the MHBPA will agree to a shorter live meet than
the 125-day statutory minimum. If the
MHBPA does not agree to a live meet shorter than 125 days, the Companys
operations could be adversely impacted by a decrease in the daily purses,
potential reduction in quality of horses, lower attendance, lower overall
handle and increased operating expenses.
3
Simulcasting.
Simulcasting is the process by which live horse races
held at one facility (the host track) are transmitted simultaneously to other
locations that allow patrons at each receiving location (the guest track) to
place wagers on races transmitted from the host track. Monies are collected at the guest track and
the information with respect to the total amount wagered is electronically
transmitted to the host track. All of
the amounts wagered at guest tracks are combined into the appropriate pools at
the host track with the final odds and payouts determined upon all the monies
in the respective pools.
The Company offers full card simulcast racing
(broadcasting of another racetracks entire daily live racing program) from up
to 20 racetracks per day, seven days a week, 364 days per year, including
Churchill Downs, Hollywood Park, Santa Anita, Gulfstream Park, Belmont Park and
Saratoga Racecourse. In addition, races
of national interest, such as the Kentucky Derby, Preakness Stakes and Breeders
Cup, supplement the regular simulcast program.
The Company regularly evaluates its agreements with other racetracks in
order to offer the most popular simulcast signals of live horse racing that are
feasible.
Under applicable provisions of federal and state law,
the Racetrack must obtain the consent of the states regulatory authority and
the organization which represents the majority of the owners and trainers of
the horses who race at the Racetrack with respect to simulcast operations both
as a host and guest track. In Minnesota,
such consent must be obtained from the MHBPA and the MRC.
(ii)
Card Club Operations
The Card Club is open 24
hours per day, seven days per week, offering two variations of unbanked card
games: Poker and Casino Games.
Poker games, including
Texas Hold Em, 7-Card Stud and Omaha, with betting limits ranging between $2
and $60, are currently offered on a maximum of 34 tables in the poker
room. A dealer, employed by the Company,
regulates the play of the game at each table and deals the cards but does not
participate in play. In poker games, the
Company is allowed to deduct a percentage from the accumulated wagers and
impose other charges for hosting the activity but does not have an interest in
the outcome of a game. The Company may
add additional prizes, awards or money to any game for promotional
purposes. The Company collects a rake
of 10% of each addition to the pot, up to a maximum of $5.00 per hand, as its
collection revenue. In addition, poker
games offer progressive jackpots for most games. In order to fund the jackpot pool, the dealer
withholds $1.00 from each final pot in excess of the $15 minimum.
Casino Games, including Pai Gow Poker, Blackjack,
Caribbean Stud, Let-It-Ride, Three Card Poker and Four Card Poker, are
currently offered at 16 of the 50 tables in the Card Club. The Companys Casino Games are required by
law to be unbanked. Unbanked refers
to a wagering system or game where wagers lost or won in card games are
accumulated into a player pool liability for purposes of enhancing the total
amount paid back to winning players. The Company may only serve as custodian of
the player pool, may not have an active interest in any card game and does not
recognize amounts that dealers win or lose during the course of play as
revenue. The Company also takes a rake
of $.50 to $3.00 per wager, depending on the game and size of wager, for the
Companys collection revenue. The only
casino game to offer a progressive jackpot is Caribbean Stud. The player has the option of playing the
jackpot and has the opportunity to win some or all of the jackpot amount,
depending upon his hand.
(iii)
Special Events
While pari-mutuel horse racing and Card Club operations
are the Companys principal businesses, the Companys facilities are capable of
being used for multiple purposes. In an
effort to more fully utilize the property and to generate additional revenues,
the Company has increasingly used its grandstand, grounds and parking lot for
special events and rentals. While the
use of the Companys facilities for particular special events and purposes
varies from year to year, the following are among the types of events and
purposes for which the
4
Companys facilities have
been used: snowmobile races, major arts and crafts shows, trade shows,
concerts, fundraisers, automobile shows and competitions, vehicle and boat
storage and private parties.
(iv)
Sources of Revenue
General.
The Companys revenues are principally derived from
Card Club operations, wagering on live and simulcast horse races and concession
sales. For the fiscal year ended December 31,
2007, revenues from Card Club operations represented 53.8% of total revenues,
wagering on horse races generated 28.7% of total revenues and concessions
revenue represented 11.4% of total revenues.
Card Club
Operations.
The
Company receives revenue from its Card Club, which operates 24 hours per day,
seven days per week. The Company
currently receives collection revenue from 34 poker tables and 16 tables
offering casino games. Under Minnesota
law, the Company is required to pay 10% of the first $6 million of gross Card
Club revenues towards purses for live horse racing at the Racetrack. After meeting the $6 million threshold, the
Company must pay 14% of gross Card Club revenues as purse monies, although by
agreement with the MHBPA, the Company paid 15% of Card Club collection revenues
into the purse fund in 2007 and 2006. Of
funds allocated for purses, the Company pays 10% of the purse monies to the
State of Minnesota Breeders Fund, with the remaining 90% of purse monies
divided between thoroughbred (90%), quarter horse (9%) and standard bred (1%)
purse funds.
Pari-mutuel wagering General.
In pari-mutuel wagering,
bettors wager against each other in a pool, rather than against the operator of
the facility or with preset odds. From
the total amount wagered (handle), the Minnesota Pari-Mutuel Horse Racing Act
(the Racing Act) specifies the maximum percentage, referred to as the takeout,
which may be withheld by the Racetrack, with the balance returned to the
winning bettors. The takeout constitutes
one of the Racetracks primary sources of operating revenue. From the takeout, funds are set aside for
purses and paid to the State of Minnesota for pari-mutuel taxes and the
Minnesota Breeders Fund (the Breeders Fund), which is a fund apportioned by
the MRC among various purposes related to Minnesotas horse breeding and horse
racing industries. The balance of the
takeout remaining after these deductions is commonly referred to as the retainage.
The various forms of pari-mutuel wagering can be
divided into two categories: straight wagering pools and multiple wagering
pools, which are also referred to as exotic wagering pools. Examples of straight wagers include: win (a
wager on one specific horse to finish first); place (a wager on one specific
horse to finish first or second); and show (a wager on one specific horse to
finish first, second or third). Examples
of exotic wagers include: daily double (a wager in which the bettor selects
the horses that will win two consecutive races); exacta (a wager in which the bettor selects
the horses that will finish first and second, in order); trifecta (a wager in
which the bettor selects the horses that will finish first, second and third,
in order); and pick six (a wager in which the bettor selects the horses that
will finish first in six consecutive races).
The amount of takeout earned by the Company depends on
where the race is run and the form of wager (straight or exotic). Net revenues from pari-mutuel wagering on
live races run at the Racetrack consist of the total amount wagered, less the
amounts paid (i) to winning patrons, (ii) for purses, (iii) to
the Breeders Fund and (iv) for pari-mutuel taxes to the State of
Minnesota. Net revenues from pari-mutuel
wagering on races being run at out-of-state racetracks and simulcast to the
Racetrack have similar expenses but also include a host fee payment to the host
track. The host fee, which is calculated
as a percentage of monies wagered (generally 2.50% to 4.50%), is negotiated
with the host track and must comply with state laws governing the host track.
5
Wagering on Live Races.
The Racing Act establishes the maximum takeout that
may be deducted from the handle. The
takeout percentage on live races depends on the type of wager. The total maximum takeouts are 17% from
straight wagering pools and 23% from exotic wagering pools. From this takeout, Minnesota law requires
deductions for purses, pari-mutuel taxes and the Breeders Fund.
While the Racing Act provides that a minimum of 8.4%
of the live racing handle is to be paid as purses to the owners of the horses,
the size of the purse is subject to further agreement with the horsepersons
associations. The Breeders Fund
receives 1% of the handle. The
pari-mutuel tax applicable to wagering on all simulcast and live races is 6% of
takeout in excess of $12 million during the twelve-month period beginning July 1
and ending the following June 30.
The following table sets forth the percentage
distribution of each dollar wagered on live races at the Racetrack, as
established by the Racing Act, and the Racetracks retainage for the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
Live Racing
|
|
|
|
Straight
|
|
Exotic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Returned to
Winning Patrons
|
|
|
|
83.00
|
%
|
|
|
77.00
|
%
|
Purse (1)
|
|
8.40
|
|
|
|
8.40
|
|
|
|
Minnesota
Breeders Fund
|
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
Minnesota
Pari-Mutuel Taxes (2)
|
|
.17
|
|
|
|
.23
|
|
|
|
Racetrack
Retainage (1)
|
|
7.43
|
|
|
|
13.37
|
|
|
|
Total Takeout
|
|
|
|
17.00
|
|
|
|
23.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Handle
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
(1)
Minnesota law provides that the 8.40% purse payment is
a minimum. The actual percentage, if
any, above the minimum is determined between the Racetrack and the MHBPA. Any additional amounts paid for purses
decrease the Racetracks retainage.
(2)
The current pari-mutuel tax structure exempts the
first $12 million of takeout during a statutorily mandated twelve-month
period. The total pari-mutuel tax
liability for a twelve-month period will depend upon the total takeout during
that period.
Wagering
on Simulcast Races.
The amount of takeout from simulcast wagering is
determined by the laws of the state in which the host track is located. In addition, the Racing Act establishes a
minimum that must be set aside from simulcasting for purse payments on racing
within Minnesota. Different amounts are
deducted for purses from the takeout depending on whether simulcasting occurs
during the Racing Season, a statutorily defined 25-week period beginning in
early May each year, or outside of the Racing Season. If simulcasting occurs during the Racing
Season, the amount set aside for purses further depends on whether the
simulcasting is part of a full racing card that occurs during the part of the
day that live races are conducted at the Racetrack. For races that are part of a full simulcast
racing card that takes place within the time of live races at the Racetrack,
the amount reserved for purse payout is 8.4%.
For simulcasting conducted during the Racing Season that does not occur
within the time period of live races, the purse is equal to 50% of the takeout
remaining after deductions for pari-mutuel taxes, payments to the Breeders
Fund and payments to the host racetrack for host track fees. For simulcasting conducted outside of the
Racing Season, the amount that must be contributed to the purses is 25% of the
takeout after deducting pari-mutuel taxes, payments to the Minnesota Breeders
Fund and host fee payments to the host racetrack.
6
The
following table sets forth the approximate percentage distribution of each
dollar wagered for races simulcast at the Racetrack and the Racetracks
retainage for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
During Racing Season
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concurrent with
Live Card
|
|
Not Concurrent with
Live Card
|
|
Outside of Racing
Season
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Returned to
Winning Patrons (1)
|
|
|
|
80.50
|
%
|
|
|
80.50
|
%
|
|
|
80.50
|
%
|
Minnesota
Breeders Fund
|
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
Minnesota
Pari-Mutuel Taxes (2)
|
|
.19
|
|
|
|
.19
|
|
|
|
.19
|
|
|
|
Purse (3)
|
|
8.40
|
|
|
|
7.49
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
|
|
|
Host Track Fees
(4)
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
Racetrack
Retainage (3)
|
|
6.41
|
|
|
|
7.32
|
|
|
|
13.01
|
|
|
|
Total Takeout
|
|
|
|
19.50
|
|
|
|
19.50
|
|
|
|
19.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Handle
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
(1)
This amount will depend upon the takeout
at the host racetrack. This percentage is determined by local and state law
applicable to the host track and ranges from 75.0% to 85.0%.
(2)
The current pari-mutuel tax structure
exempts the first $12 million of takeout during a statutorily mandated
twelve-month period. The total
pari-mutuel tax liability for a twelve-month period will depend upon the total
takeout during that period.
(3)
Although Minnesota law specifies purse
percentages, the actual percentage is determined by agreement between the
Racetrack and the MHBPA. For the year
ended December 31, 2006, the MHBPA allowed a 3.7% expense deduction, and
in 2007, the expense deduction allowed was 2.1%. In 2008, the expense deduction is estimated
to be 2.1%.
(4)
Payments to the host track generally
range from 2.5% to 4.5% of total handle, subject to negotiation with each host
track. For purposes of this table, the
host track fee is assumed to be 3.5%.
Concessions
Revenue.
The Company earns revenue
from food and beverage sales in its restaurant, group catering areas and
numerous concession stands located throughout the facility. Food and beverage sales are offered during
live and simulcast racing in the Card Club and during special events.
Other
Revenue.
The Company generates cash revenues from the receipt
of admission and reserved seating charges, preferred and valet parking and the
sales of various daily pari-mutuel publications. Additional revenues are derived from the operation
of an RV Park during the summer months and the use of the facility year round
for special events such as concerts, trade and craft shows, snowmobile racing,
business meetings, private parties, horse expositions and sales, boat and
automobile storage and community events.
The Company also generates revenue from providing advertising signage
space, similar to that appearing at many sports stadiums, and leases excess
parking lot space for various automotive activities and vehicle storage.
(v)
Competition
From 1994 through 2004, the Company was the only
racetrack licensed to operate in the State of Minnesota. On January 20, 2005, the MRC granted a
license to the North Metro Harness Initiative, LLC (NMHI) to construct and
operate a harness racetrack in Columbus Township, Anoka County, MN. Columbus Township is approximately 50 miles
from Canterbury Park. This license
authorizes NMHI to engage in pari-mutuel wagering on live and simulcast racing
for standardbred (harness) horses. NMHI
has stated they intend to commence operations in April 2008. Current Minnesota state law permits licensed
racetracks to operate a card room with up to 50 tables subject to completion of
a 50-day live race meet and regulatory approval of a card room plan of
operation. NMHI has publicly stated its
intentions to obtain a license to operate a card room at the completion of the
minimum 50 live race days. Currently,
NMHI has also proposed a bill to allow pari-
7
mutuel simulcast racing
of all breeds at its racetrack. As of
the date of this report, this bill had passed the floor of the Senate in the
Minnesota Legislature but had yet to be voted on by the House of
Representatives.
The Company competes with other forms of gaming,
principally casino-style gambling including slots and blackjack offered at
numerous tribal casinos located throughout the State of Minnesota, including a
large casino located approximately four miles from the Racetrack. More recently, unbanked card games have also
become available at some tribal casinos.
In addition, the Company competes against charitable gambling (bingo and
pull tabs) and various state lottery products. The Company also faces
increasing competition from offshore and out-of-state simulcast operations
offering Internet and telephone account home wagering systems to Minnesota
residents, although Minnesota regulatory authorities consider such wagering to
be illegal.
The Company also competes with other forms of
entertainment in the Minneapolis-Saint Paul metropolitan area, including a wide
range of live and televised professional and collegiate sporting events. In addition, live horse racing competes with
a wide variety of summer attractions, including amusements parks, sporting
events and other local activities.
The Company competes with
racetracks located throughout the United States in securing horses to run at
the Racetrack. Attracting owners and
trainers is largely dependent on the ability to offer large purses. The Company experiences significant
competition for horses from racetracks located near Des Moines, Iowa and
Chicago, Illinois, both of which offer substantially larger purses than the
Company. This competition is expected to
continue for the foreseeable future.
(vi)
Regulation
General.
The ownership and operation of the Racetrack in
Minnesota is subject to significant regulation by the MRC under the Racing Act
and the rules adopted by the MRC.
The Racing Act provides for the allocation of each wagering pool to
winning bettors, the Racetrack, purses, pari-mutuel taxes and the Breeders
Fund and empowers the MRC to license and regulate substantially all aspects of
horse racing in the State. The MRC,
among other things, grants operating licenses to racetracks after an
application process and public hearings, licenses all employees of a racetrack,
jockeys, trainers, veterinarians and other participants, regulates the transfer
of ownership interests in licenses, allocates live race days and simulcast-only
race days, approves race programs, regulates the conduct of races, sets
specifications for the racing ovals, animal facilities, employee quarters and
public areas of racetracks, regulates the types of wagers on horse races, and
approves significant contractual arrangements with racetracks, including
management agreements, simulcast arrangements, totalizator contracts and
concessionaire agreements.
A federal statute, the
Interstate Horse Racing Act of 1978, also provides that a racetrack must obtain
the consent of the group representing the horsepersons (owners and trainers)
racing the breed of horses that race a majority of the time at the racetrack,
and the consent of the state agency regulating the racetrack, in order to
transmit simulcast signals of its live races or to receive and use simulcast
signals from other racetracks. The
Company has obtained the consent of the MHBPA and MRC for receiving and sending
simulcast signals.
Issuance of Class A, and Class B Licenses
to the Company.
The Company holds a Class A License, issued by
the MRC, which allows the Company to own and operate the Racetrack. The Class A License is effective until
revoked, suspended by the MRC or relinquished by the licensee. Currently, the fee for a Class A License
is $253,000 per fiscal year.
The Company also holds a Class B License, issued
by the MRC, that allows the Company to sponsor and manage horse racing on which
pari-mutuel wagering is conducted at its Class A licensed racetrack and on
other horse races run at out-of-state locations as authorized by the MRC. The Class B License is renewable each
year by the MRC after a public hearing (if required by the MRC). Currently, the fee for the Class B
License is $500 for each assigned race day on which live racing is actually
conducted and $100 for each day on which simulcasting is authorized and
actually takes place.
8
Limitation on the Number of Class A, and Class B
Licenses.
Pursuant to the Racing Act, so long as the Racetrack
maintains its Class A License, no other Class A License may be issued
to operate a racetrack in the seven county metropolitan area (the counties of
Hennepin, Ramsey, Washington, Scott, Dakota, Anoka and Carver), except the MRC
may issue an additional Class A License within the seven county
metropolitan area, provided that the additional license may only be issued for
a facility which, among other conditions, is located more than 20 miles from
the Racetrack, contains a track no larger than five-eighths of a mile in
circumference, and is used exclusively for standardbred (harness) racing. An additional Class A license was issued
to NMHI on January 20, 2005 (see Competition above). However, as long as the Company holds its Class A
License, only the Company may own and operate a racetrack in the seven county
metropolitan area where thoroughbred horses and quarter horses may be raced.
Limitation on Ownership and Management of an
Entity, which holds a Class A License and/or Class B License.
The Racing Act requires prior MRC approval of all
officers, directors, 5% shareholders or other persons having a present or
future direct or indirect financial or management interest in any person
applying for a Class A and Class B license, and if a change of
ownership of more than 5% of the licensees shares is made after an application
is filed or the license issued, the applicant or licensee must notify the MRC
of the changes within five days of this occurrence and provide the information
required by the Racing Act.
Card Club
Regulation.
The
MRC is authorized by law to regulate Card Club operations, and the law requires
that the Company reimburse the MRC for its actual costs, including personnel
costs, of regulating the Card Club. For
fiscal years ended December 31, 2007, and 2006, the Company paid $128,000
and $120,000, respectively, to the MRC as reimbursement for costs of regulating
card club operations.
The
MRC issued an additional Class B License to the Company on January 19,
2000 that authorizes the Company to host unbanked card games. The Class B License is renewable each
year by the MRC after a public hearing (if required by the MRC). Currently, the Class B License Fee of
$10,000 per calendar year is included in the Class A License Fee of
$253,000 per calendar year.
Local Regulation.
The Companys operations are subject to state and
local laws, regulations, ordinances and other provisions affecting zoning and
other matters which may have the effect of restricting the uses to which the
Companys land and other assets may be used.
Also, any development of the Racetrack site is, among other things,
subject to applicable zoning ordinances and requires approval by the City of
Shakopee and other authorities and there can be no assurance such approvals
would be obtained if any development was undertaken.
(vii)
Legislation
The Company did not propose or support any legislation
during the 2007 biannual session of the Minnesota Legislature to pursue our
Racino proposal that has been discussed in our previous flings with the SEC,
mainly because the composition of the Minnesota Legislature following the November 2006
elections was viewed as unlikely to favorably entertain our Racino
proposal. Based on the success of
several Racinos in other states, we continue to believe that if a Racino was
authorized at the Racetrack, it would enhance horseracing with increased
purses, provide growth and development opportunities for the Company and
provide significant new tax revenues for state and local governments.
In May 2007, a bill
passed in the Minnesota Legislature severely restricting smoking in all public
places in Minnesota, including at the Racetrack, effective October 1,
2007. Tribal casinos located in
Minnesota are not covered by this legislation and will continue to offer
various gaming alternatives, including card games, in an environment that
allows smoking. Since October 1,
2007, this legislation has had, and may continue to have, a
9
significant adverse
effect on the Companys revenues and profits.
The Company believes that simulcast customers who smoke and have left
our facilities are wagering on the Internet.
The Company also believes card club customers who smoke are now
patronizing tribal casinos where smoking is permitted.
(viii)
Marketing
The Companys primary market is the seven-county
Minneapolis-Saint Paul metropolitan area plus the two counties to the south of
the Racetrack. Current demographic information indicates that approximately 2.2
million adults age 18 and older reside within the primary market. The City of Shakopee, located in the
southwestern portion of the metropolitan area, is one of the fastest growing
communities in the region and Scott County is one of the fastest growing
counties in the country. Between 2005
and 2010, the population of adults age 18 and older in the primary market is
expected to increase by an estimated 6.7%.
To support its pari-mutuel horse racing and Card Club
businesses, the Company conducts year-round marketing efforts to maintain the
loyalty of live racing and simulcast patrons and attract new racing and Card
Club customers. The Company utilizes
newspapers and television advertising, the Internet, other print media, radio
and direct mail. Often, the Company
combines its marketing efforts to communicate the excitement of both wagering
on horse racing and card playing. In
addition to its regular advertising program, the Company conducts numerous
special promotions and handicapping contests to increase simulcast patronage
and maintains successful pari-mutuel player and Casino Games player rewards
programs. In addition, the development
and maintenance of a customer database over the past several years has enabled
the Company to effectively utilize direct mail advertising.
Because wagering on horse racing and playing poker and
casino style card games are more complex than many other forms of gaming, such
as slot machines or various lottery products, the Company continues to develop
and conduct various educational programs, such as complimentary poker and
casino games lessons, tours of the Racetrack, wagering and handicapping classes
and contests that it believes will make pari-mutuel wagering on horse racing
and card playing more understandable to the general public.
(ix)
Employees
At March 24, 2008, the Company had 381 full-time
employees and 273 part-time employees.
On a seasonal basis, the Company adds approximately 120 full-time and
250 part-time employees for live racing operations from early May until
early September. The Companys
management believes its employee relations are good.
(x)
Executive Officers
The executive officers of the Company, their ages and
their positions with the Company are as follows:
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position with Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randall D. Sampson
|
|
49
|
|
President, CEO and
General Manager
|
|
|
|
|
|
David C. Hansen
|
|
51
|
|
Vice President of
Finance, CFO and Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark A. Erickson
|
|
51
|
|
Vice President of
Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jerrold J. Fuller
|
|
63
|
|
Vice President of Card
Club Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Garin
|
|
52
|
|
Vice President of
Hospitality and Assistant Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eric A. Halstrom
|
|
39
|
|
Vice President of
Racing and Simulcasting
|
|
|
|
|
|
John R. Harty
|
|
63
|
|
Vice President of
Marketing
|
10
Randall D. Sampson has
been President and Chief Executive Officer since the formation of the Company
in March 1994 and General Manager since September 1995. He has been active in horse industry
associations, currently serving on the Board of Directors of the Thoroughbred
Racetracks of America and is past President of the Minnesota Thoroughbred
Association. Mr. Sampson also
currently serves as a director of Communications Systems, Inc. (AMEX:JCS),
a manufacturer of telecommunications and data communications products based in
Hector, Minnesota. Mr. Sampson is
the son of Curtis A. Sampson, the Companys Chairman of the Board and the
beneficial owner of approximately 22% of the Companys common stock.
David
C. Hansen joined the Company in July 2001 as Vice President of Finance and
Chief Financial Officer. From 2000 to
2001, Mr. Hansen served as Director of Accounting for Prairie Meadows
Racetrack and Casino in Altoona, IA, one of the nations first Racino
operations. He served as Controller and
later Director of Finance at Treasure Island Resort & Casino, in Red
Wing, MN, from 1993 until 2000. Mr. Hansen
earned his CPA certification in 1983. Mr. Hansen
is a member of the Minnesota Society of Certified Public Accountants, the
Hospitality Financial and Technology Professionals Association, and the
Financial Executive International.
Mark A. Erickson has been
Vice President of Facilities since May 1997, serving as the Racetracks
Director of Facilities since April 1994.
From 1992 to 1994, Mr. Erickson served as Maintenance Supervisor
for the Mall of America, supervising the interior maintenance for one of the
largest shopping malls in North America.
Mr. Erickson was Master Electrician for Canterbury Downs from 1986
to 1992, supervising the installation and maintenance of all electrical
equipment.
Jerrold J. Fuller has been Vice President of Card Club
Operations since June of 2005. He
previously worked in various capacities for the Company including most recently
as the Executive Director of Card Club Operations. He joined the Company in February 2000
as a Poker Shift Manager and played a significant role in the opening of the
Card Club in April of that year. Mr. Fuller
has been employed in the gaming industry since 1968 in California, Montana, and
Louisiana and is currently a member of the Poker Tournament Directors
Association of America.
Michael J. Garin has been
Vice President of Hospitality since May of 1997. He had served as
President of Canterbury Park Concessions, Inc. since September 1995. From 1993 to 1994, Mr. Garin served as
Food & Beverage Supervisor for Little Six, Inc., one of the
largest tribal casino operations in the country. Mr. Garin was President of MMR Vending, Inc.,
a regional vending company, from 1988 to 1992.
Prior to 1988, he was a Regional Director at General Mills Restaurant
Group overseeing seven restaurants in three states.
Eric A. Halstrom has been
Vice President of Racing and Simulcasting since June of 2005. Employed at Canterbury Park since 1997, Mr. Halstrom
has worked in various capacities for the Company including most recently as the
Executive Director of Teleracing Operations.
Prior to his employment with Canterbury Park, Mr. Halstrom worked
for Churchill Downs Management Company from 1994 to 1997 and was their Director
of Off-Track Betting Operations in Indiana.
Mr. Halstrom serves on the Board of Directors of the North Star
Problem Gambling Alliance and the Minnesota affiliate of the National Council
on Problem Gambling.
John R. Harty joined the Company in February 2000
as Vice President of Marketing. From
1996 to 1999, Mr. Harty served as President of Minneapolis based Sun
Products, a manufacturer of sporting goods and pet products. He served that company as Vice President of
Sales and Marketing from 1992 to 1996.
From 1977 to 1991, Mr. Harty worked for Genesco, a billion dollar
footwear company. He served as Executive
Vice President in charge of Sales and Marketing for its Hosiery Divisions
located in New York City. Mr. Harty
currently serves on the Board and as Vice Chairman of the Shakopee Area Chamber
of Commerce.
Item
1A. RISK FACTORS
The Company is subject to risk factors that may affect
our operating results. Such risk factors
include, but are not limited to, the matters discussed below as well as the
additional risks discussed under Forward Looking Statements on page 28 of
this Form 10-K for additional risks to which the Company is exposed.
11
We face
significant competition from other gaming operations that could have a material
adverse effect on our operations.
We face intense competition in our market,
particularly competition from tribal casinos.
Such facilities have the advantage of being exempt from certain state
and federal taxes. We also compete with
Internet wagering on horse races, other forms of gambling, other forms of
entertainment and other racetracks throughout the country as previously
discussed under
Competition
above.
In addition, another
racetrack will begin competing with the Company. In early 2005, the MRC granted a license to
NMHI to construct and operate a harness racetrack in Columbus Township, Anoka
County, MN, which is approximately 50 miles from the Racetrack. This license authorizes NMHI to engage in
pari-mutuel wagering on live and simulcast racing for standardbred (harness)
horses. In addition, Minnesota law
permits licensed racetracks to operate a card room with up to 50 tables after
completing a 50-day live race meet and regulatory approval of a card room plan
of operation. NMHI has publicly stated
its intentions to obtain a license to operate a card room at the completion of
the minimum 50 live race days.
Currently, NMHI has also proposed a bill to allow pari-mutuel simulcast
racing of all breeds at its racetrack.
As of the date of this report, this bill had passed the floor of the
Senate in the Minnesota Legislature but had yet to be voted on by the House of
Representatives.
We expect competition for
our existing and future operations to increase both from NMHI and as existing
tribal casinos expand their operations.
In addition, several of our tribal gaming competitors have substantially
larger marketing and financial resources than we do. We are unable to predict with any certainty
the effects of existing and future competition on our operating results.
We are
subject to extensive regulation from gaming authorities that could adversely
affect us.
The ownership and operation of our Racetrack and Card
Club are subject to significant regulation by the MRC under the Racing Act and
the rules adopted by the MRC. The
MRC has the authority to impose increases in the Class A and Class B
license fees. In addition, State law
requires that we reimburse the MRC for its actual costs of regulating the Card
Club, including personnel costs.
Increases in these licensing and regulatory costs could adversely affect
our results of operations.
Decisions by the MRC in regard to any one or more of
the following matters could also adversely affect the Companys
operations: the granting of operating
licenses to Canterbury Park and other racetracks after an application process
and public hearings; the licensing of all employees of a racetrack, jockeys,
trainers, veterinarians and other participants; regulating the transfer of ownership
interests in licenses, allocating live race days and simulcast-only race days,
approving race programs, regulating the conduct of races, setting
specifications for the racing ovals, animal facilities, employee quarters and
public areas of racetracks; changes to the types of wagers on horse races; and
approval of significant contractual agreements.
We are
subject to changes in the laws that govern our business, including the
possibility of an increase in gaming taxes, which would increase our costs, and
changes in other laws may adversely affect our ability to compete.
Our operations and oversight by the MRC are ultimately
subject to the laws of Minnesota and there exists the risk that these laws may
be amended in ways adverse to our operations.
In particular, we are required to pay taxes and fees in addition to
normal federal, state and local income taxes, and such taxes and fees are
subject to increase at any time. From
time to time, state and local legislators and officials have proposed changes in
tax laws, or in the administration of laws affecting our industry, such as the
allocation of each wagering pool to winning bettors, the Racetrack, purses and
the Breeders Fund. In addition, poor
economic conditions could intensify the efforts of state and local governments
to raise revenues through increases in gaming taxes. It is not possible to determine with
certainty the likelihood of changes in tax laws or in the administration of
such laws. Such changes, if adopted,
could have a material adverse effect on our operations.
We are also subject to laws in Minnesota that affect
businesses generally. It is possible, as a result of the legislative
process, that legislation directly or indirectly adverse to the Company may be
enacted into law. As
12
previously discussed under
Legislation
above,
in May 2007, a bill passed in the
Minnesota Legislature severely restricting smoking in all public places in
Minnesota, including at the Racetrack, effective October 1, 2007. Tribal casinos located in Minnesota are not
covered by this legislation and will continue to offer various gaming
alternatives, including card games, in an environment that allows smoking. Since October 1, 2007, this legislation
has had, and may continue to have, a significant adverse effect on the Companys
revenues and profits. The Company
believes that simulcast customers who smoke and have left our facilities are
wagering on the Internet. The Company
also believes card club customers who smoke are now patronizing tribal casinos
where smoking is permitted.
Energy
and fuel price increases may adversely affect our costs of operations and our
revenues.
Our
facility uses significant amounts of electricity, natural gas and other forms
of energy. Increases in the cost of
electricity or natural gas negatively affect our results of operations. In addition, energy and fuel price increases
could negatively impact our operations by reducing disposable income of
potential customers and decreasing visitation to our facility.
A
downturn in general economic conditions may adversely affect our results of
operations.
Our business is subject to changes in national and
local economic conditions, including changes in the economy related to
threatened or actual terrorist attacks and related to the war with Iraq. A recession or downturn in the general or
regional economy could result in fewer customers visiting our facility,
adversely affecting our results of operations.
Item
1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not
Applicable.
Item 2.
PROPERTIES
General.
The Companys facilities, which are operated under the
name Canterbury Park Racetrack and Card Club, are a modern complex of
buildings and grounds, generally comparable to other major racetracks located throughout
the country. The Racetracks grandstand
has a patron capacity of approximately 10,000 within enclosed areas and a
maximum patron capacity of over 30,000 including outside areas around the
grandstand. The grandstand and most
public outdoor areas contain numerous pari-mutuel windows, odds information
boards, video monitors, concessions stands and other amenities. The audio/visual system includes over 600
television monitors with most areas providing multi-screen viewing of the
races.
The Racetrack is located approximately 25 miles
southwest of downtown Minneapolis. The
area immediately surrounding the Racetrack consists of commercial and
industrial buildings, farmland and residential areas. The Racetrack is in reasonable proximity to a
number of major entertainment destinations including: Valleyfair, an amusement park about two miles
from the Racetrack which annually attracts approximately more than one million
visitors during the spring and summer; the Renaissance Festival, a
seven-weekend late summer annual event attracting approximately 300,000
visitors, located about five miles from the Racetrack; and Mystic Lake Casino,
located about four miles from the Racetrack, which draws approximately 5.2
million patrons annually. The Mall of
America, the largest enclosed shopping mall in the United States, which
attracts more than 40 million visitors per year, is approximately 17 miles from
the Racetrack.
Racing Surfaces.
The racing surfaces consist of a one-mile oval
dirt/limestone track and a 7/8 mile oval turf course. The dirt track includes a mile and
one-quarter front stretch chute, a 6-1/2 furlong backstretch chute and a 3-½
furlong chute and is lighted for night racing.
13
Grandstand.
The grandstand is a modern, air-conditioned enclosed
structure of approximately 275,000 square feet with a variety of facilities on
six levels. The lower level contains
space for support functions such as jockey quarters, administrative offices,
Racing Commission offices, first aid, mechanical and electrical rooms. The track level includes pari-mutuel windows,
restrooms, a variety of concession stands and other services as well as the
Card Club which occupies 27,000 square feet on the track level. The mezzanine
level contains 1,320 fixed seats in a glass-enclosed, air-conditioned area and
an additional 3,000 seats located outside.
In addition to the seats, the mezzanine Level contains pari-mutuel
windows, restrooms, concession stands and other guest facilities. A portion of
the mezzanine level is currently being used as a simulcast center during live
racing, and for banquets and other events during the off-season. The kitchen level is an intermediate level
located between the mezzanine and clubhouse floors. It contains a full-service kitchen which
supports a full dining menu for the track-side dining terraces on the clubhouse
level and food preparation for the other concession areas. The clubhouse level is a multi-purpose area
serving as a simulcast center during wagering sessions on televised races, as
well as a full-service dining area during the live racing season. The clubhouse level includes 325 trackside
tables, each equipped with a television set, with a total seating capacity of
1,200 patrons and an additional 1,000 seats are located in lounges located
throughout the area. The press box and
officials level is located in the roof trusses over the clubhouse and contains
work areas for the press, racing officials, closed-circuit television, photo
finish and the track announcer. In
addition, the grandstand was structurally built to accommodate skyboxes under
the press box/officials level, although none have yet been constructed. Escalators and elevators are available to
move patrons among the various levels within the grandstand.
Barn and Backside Facilities.
The stable area consists of 33 barns with a total of
approximately 1,650 stalls. In the
stable area, there are 216 dormitory rooms for the grooms and others working at
the Racetrack. The stable area also
contains a combination racing office and cafeteria/recreation building for
stable personnel, two blacksmith buildings and a one half mile training track.
Parking.
Approximately 7,500 paved parking spaces are available
for patron and employee automobiles at the Racetrack, including parking spaces
that are reserved for handicapped patrons.
The Racetrack also has unpaved areas available for overflow parking for
approximately 5,000 additional automobiles.
Areas are also reserved for bus parking.
RV
Park.
The Company owns and operates a recreational vehicle
(RV) park, located two miles from the Racetrack in Shakopee, Minnesota on
approximately 29 acres adjacent to the Minnesota River. The RV Park has 68 independent sites and 40
dependent sites, an indoor swimming pool, laundry facilities, game room and
mini store. The sites are rented to
horsemen participating in Canterburys racing operations, seasonal employees
and the general public.
Undeveloped
Land.
Approximately 100 acres of the 380 acres owned by the
Company are not necessary for current operations. This property could be sold in whole or in
part, depending upon future opportunities.
The Company regularly evaluates other business activities and
development opportunities that would maximize the use of the real estate
surrounding the Racetrack and which would complement the Companys primary
businesses of horse racing and card club operations. In 2007, the Company conducted planning and
research to develop a portion of our land into a unique retail and
entertainment destination.
14
Item 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There are no material legal proceedings pending
against the Company. From time to time,
the Company is party to ordinary and routine litigation incidental to our
business. We do not expect the outcome
of any such pending litigation to have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Item 4.
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE
OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
Not Applicable.
PART II
Item 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON
EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
(a)
MARKET INFORMATION
The Companys Common Stock trades on the American
Stock Exchange under the symbol ECP. The
table set forth below indicates the high and low sale prices for the Common
Stock in the quarterly periods ending December 31, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
14.51
|
|
$
|
13.06
|
|
$
|
15.00
|
|
$
|
13.60
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
14.69
|
|
11.00
|
|
14.50
|
|
13.35
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
13.55
|
|
11.45
|
|
13.80
|
|
12.50
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
12.94
|
|
10.01
|
|
13.69
|
|
12.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
HOLDERS
At March 14, 2008, the Company had 768 holders of
record of its common stock. In addition,
on that date, a depository company held approximately 2,617,000 shares as
nominee for an estimated 1,733 beneficial holders.
(c)
DIVIDENDS
The Company paid special cash dividends on its common
stock of $.25 per share on July 13, 2007 and $.25 per share on July 14,
2006. The Company has not adopted any
policy regarding the payment of dividends and further dividend payments, if
any, would require Board of Director approval.
15
(d)
INFORMATION REGARDING EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
The
following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2007 regarding
our equity compensation plans.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans
Plan Category (1)
|
|
(a)
Number of shares of
common stock to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
|
|
(b)
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
|
|
(c)
Number of shares of
common stock
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding shares in
column (a))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 Stock Plan
|
|
605,900
|
|
$
|
11.00
|
|
173,500
|
|
1995 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Option
Plan for Non-Employee Consultants and Advisors (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
172,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
605,900
|
|
|
|
467,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The Company does not have individual compensation arrangements
involving the granting of options, warrants, rights or restricted stock.
(2) Adopted
by the Companys Board of Directors in 1997, the purpose of the Stock Option
Plan for Non-Employee Consultants and Advisors is to attract and retain the
services of experienced and knowledgeable non-employee consultants and advisors
to assist in projects having strategic significance for the Company, to provide
an alternative form of cash compensation to such persons and to provide such persons
with the opportunity to participate in the Companys long term progress and
success.
(e)
INFORMATION REQUIRED BY ITEM 201(e) OF REGULATION
S-K
Canterbury Park is not
required to provide the information requested by this Item as it qualifies as a
smaller reporting company.
(f)
INFORMATION REQUIRED BY ITEM 701
OF REGULATION S-K
Not applicable.
16
(g)
INFORMATION REQUIRED BY ITEM 703
OF REGULATION S-K
As reflected in
the following table, on November 2, 2006 the Company announced that its
Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 100,000 shares of the
Companys common stock. On December 6,
2006, the Company repurchased 53,050 shares of common stock at a price of
$13.10 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $694,955. During 2007, the Company repurchased the
remaining 46,950 shares at an average price of $11.59 per share for a total of
$544,110. A month-by-month breakdown of
purchases is included in the following table.
Period
|
|
Total Number of
Shares
Purchased
|
|
Average Price
Paid per Share
|
|
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plan
|
|
Maximum Number
of Shares that May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plan
|
|
Nov 1 to Nov 30,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Dec 1 to Dec 31,
2006
|
|
53,050
|
|
$
|
13.10
|
|
53,050
|
|
46,950
|
|
Jan 1 to Jan 31,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,950
|
|
Feb 1 to Feb 28,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,950
|
|
Mar 1 to Mar 31,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,950
|
|
Apr 1 to Apr 30,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,950
|
|
May 1 to
May 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,950
|
|
Jun 1 to Jun 30,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,950
|
|
Jul 1 to Jul 31,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,950
|
|
Aug 1 to Aug 31,
2007
|
|
3,555
|
|
$
|
12.54
|
|
56,605
|
|
43,395
|
|
Sept 1 to Sept
30, 2007
|
|
826
|
|
$
|
12.56
|
|
57,431
|
|
42,569
|
|
Oct 1 to Oct 31,
2007
|
|
16,925
|
|
$
|
12.02
|
|
74,356
|
|
25,644
|
|
Nov 1 to Nov 30,
2007
|
|
20,602
|
|
$
|
11.12
|
|
94,958
|
|
5,042
|
|
Dec 1 to Dec 31,
2007
|
|
5,042
|
|
$
|
11.25
|
|
100,000
|
|
0
|
|
Total
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
0
|
|
17
Item 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(In thousands except for
per share amounts)
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING
DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
$
|
52,880
|
|
$
|
55,840
|
|
$
|
54,920
|
|
$
|
54,428
|
|
$
|
47,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
48,723
|
|
50,660
|
|
49,474
|
|
47,661
|
|
42,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before
Income Tax Expense
|
|
4,486
|
|
5,459
|
|
5,565
|
|
6,801
|
|
5,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax
Expense
|
|
(1,865
|
)
|
(2,334
|
)
|
(2,512
|
)
|
(2,939
|
)
|
(2,429
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
2,621
|
|
$
|
3,125
|
|
$
|
3,053
|
|
$
|
3,862
|
|
$
|
2,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Net Income
per Share
|
|
$
|
.65
|
|
$
|
.78
|
|
$
|
.78
|
|
$
|
1.02
|
|
$
|
.78
|
|
Diluted Net
Income per Share
|
|
.62
|
|
.74
|
|
.73
|
|
.92
|
|
.70
|
|
Dividends per
Share
|
|
.25
|
|
.25
|
|
.25
|
|
.25
|
|
.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from
Operations
|
|
$
|
4,608
|
|
$
|
5,973
|
|
$
|
4,714
|
|
$
|
6,336
|
|
$
|
4,702
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE
SHEET DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land,
Buildings & Equipment
|
|
$
|
25,038
|
|
$
|
24,904
|
|
$
|
22,694
|
|
$
|
20,439
|
|
$
|
17,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
36,106
|
|
34,351
|
|
31,440
|
|
28,223
|
|
22,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders
Equity
|
|
28,578
|
|
26,860
|
|
24,358
|
|
20,996
|
|
16,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book Value per
Share
|
|
$
|
7.00
|
|
$
|
6.63
|
|
$
|
6.15
|
|
$
|
5.47
|
|
$
|
4.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Common
Shares Outstanding at Year End
|
|
4,084
|
|
4,051
|
|
3,960
|
|
3,836
|
|
3,714
|
|
18
I
tem 7.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) is intended to help
the reader understand Canterbury Park Holding Corporation, our operations and
our present business environment. This
MD&A is provided as a supplement to and should be read in conjunction
with our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the
financial statements (the Notes).
STRATEGIC
OVERVIEW
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (the Company)
was incorporated under the laws of Minnesota and acquired land and buildings to
conduct pari-mutuel horse racing operations (the Racetrack) in March 1994. The Racetrack is located in Shakopee,
Minnesota, approximately 25 miles southwest of downtown Minneapolis. In May 1994, we commenced year-round
horse racing simulcast operations and hosted the first annual live race meet
during the summer of 1995. Our live
racing operations are a seasonal business as we host live race meets each year
from early May until Labor Day. We
earn additional pari-mutuel revenue by televising our live racing to
out-of-state Racetracks around the country.
We also derive revenues from related services and activities, such as advertising,
admissions, parking and publication sales and from other entertainment events
and activities held at the Racetrack.
In April 2000, we
opened Canterbury Parks Card Club (the Card Club). The Card Club operates 24 hours a day, seven
days a week and is limited by Minnesota State law to a maximum of 50
tables. The Card Club currently offers
34 tables of Poker Games and 16 tables of Casino Games.
Our three largest
sources of revenues, Card Club operations, pari-mutuel operations and
concessions sales, generate cash revenues.
Consequently, the Company is highly liquid and has not utilized its line
of credit in over five years.
Financial Performance Summary
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
$
|
52,880
|
|
$
|
55,840
|
|
$
|
54,920
|
|
$
|
54,428
|
|
$
|
47,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Expenses
|
|
48,723
|
|
50,660
|
|
49,474
|
|
47,661
|
|
42,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before
Income Tax Expense
|
|
4,486
|
|
5,459
|
|
5,565
|
|
6,801
|
|
5,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax
Expense
|
|
(1,865
|
)
|
(2,334
|
)
|
(2,512
|
)
|
(2,939
|
)
|
(2,429
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
2,621
|
|
$
|
3,125
|
|
$
|
3,053
|
|
$
|
3,862
|
|
$
|
2,870
|
|
The primary strengths of
Canterbury Park are our dedicated and capable staff, our first-class facilities
and 380-acre property and the legal authority to offer our unique gaming
products in our market area.
Our management
team has extensive knowledge of the horse racing and card businesses and our
staff has demonstrated a commitment to our customers. We continue to implement improvements to our comprehensive customer satisfaction
measurement and enhancement program. Our management team has a good relationship
with our workforce and is able to retain qualified personnel as demonstrated by
our low turnover rate.
Our facilities are modern
by racetrack industry standards, and we have invested heavily in the past few
years to update and upgrade them to meet the needs of our customers and
horsemen. Our 380-acre property with a
prime location in one of the fastest-growing counties in Minnesota provides us
with great long-term growth and development opportunities. Our Board of Directors has begun the process
of conducting research to determine the highest and best potential uses of our
underutilized land. Our long-term
strategic direction is to enhance the character of our property as a unique
gaming and entertainment destination.
19
We have a strong
commitment to live racing and have been particularly successful in attracting
new customers and providing a quality live racing experience for our horse
racing fans as well as the horsemen who participate in the live racing at
Canterbury Park. The success of the Card
Club has greatly enhanced our ability to offer a more competitive purse
structure for live racing and has allowed us to make significant improvements
to our Grandstand and the backside stabling and training facilities. As a result, we have been near capacity for
horses stabled at Canterbury Park during our recent live race meets. We have also increased live racing attendance
during a time when the industry trend has generally been downward.
Currently,
we are the only facility offering live and simulcast racing in our market,
although we do have competition in the simulcast market from Internet horse
racing sites. While a number of tribal
casinos located in Minnesota operate the same unbanked card games offered at
Canterbury Park, we are currently the only non-tribal operator, and we have the
only non-tribal Poker room operating within the seven-county Twin Cities
metropolitan area. However, in January 2005,
the Minnesota Racing Commission (MRC) granted a second license for the
construction and operation of a harness racetrack in Columbus Township, Anoka
County, MN. Under current law, this licensee
would be allowed to offer live and simulcast wagering only on harness
races. The harness racetrack is
scheduled to begin live racing in mid-April.
Current law also permits the licensee to receive a license to host
unbanked card games in a card room similar to the Companys Card Club after it
conducts a 50-day live harness racing meet.
The harness racetrack has submitted their plan of operation and received
approval from the MRC and expects to open their card room in July.
We continue to
believe that our best option for long-term growth is to gain authority under
Minnesota law to offer additional
gaming options, which would enhance horse racing with increased purses, provide
growth and development opportunities and produce significant new tax revenues
for state and local governments. The
effort to obtain legislative authority for these initiatives has required, and
will continue to require, substantial expenditures. Due to the inherent uncertainty of the
outcome of legislative activities, there can be no assurance that any bills
favorable to the Companys interests will be enacted into law, and it is
possible, as a result of the legislative process, that legislation directly or
indirectly adverse to the Company may be enacted into law.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The
preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We base our assumptions,
estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends and other
factors that management believes to be relevant at the time the consolidated
financial statements are prepared. On a
regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates
and judgments to ensure that our financial statements are presented fairly and
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. However, because future events and their
effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from
our assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material.
Our
significant accounting policies are included in Note 1 to our consolidated
financial statements. We believe the following critical accounting policies
affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of
our consolidated financial statements.
Property
and Equipment -
We
have significant capital invested in our property and equipment, which
represents approximately 69.3% of our total assets at December 31, 2007.
We utilize our judgment in various ways including: determining whether an
expenditure is considered a maintenance expense or a capital asset; determining
the estimated useful lives of assets; and determining if or when an asset has
been impaired. Management periodically
reviews the carrying value of property and equipment for potential impairment
by comparing the carrying value of these assets with their related expected
future net cash flows. Should the sum of
the related expected future net cash flows be less than the carrying value, we
will determine whether an impairment loss should be recognized. An impairment loss would be measured by the
amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the
asset. To date, we have determined that
no impairment of these assets exists.
20
Stock
Based Employee Compensation
- In December 2004, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) revised SFAS No.123, Share Based
Payment (SFAS No. 123R). This
Statement supercedes APB Opinion No. 25, which resulted in no stock-based
employee compensation cost related to stock options if the options granted had
an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on
the date of grant. SFAS No. 123R
requires recognition of employee services provided in exchange for a
share-based payment based on the grant date fair market value. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123R as of January 1,
2006. As of the effective date, this
Statement applies to all new awards issued as well as awards modified,
repurchased or cancelled. Additionally,
for stock-based awards issued prior to the effective date, compensation cost
attributable to future services will be recognized as the remaining service is
rendered. The Company elected to apply
the modified prospective method of adoption of SFAS No.123R.
Regulation
-
Our
business can be materially impacted both positively and negatively by
legislative and regulatory changes, such as those previously described. Significant negative changes resulting from
these activities could result in an impairment of our property and equipment in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Additional information regarding how our
business can be impacted by regulatory and legislative changes are included in
Item 1 (vi) and Item 1 (vii), respectively, in this Form 10-K.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48),
which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a
companys financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes.
FIN 48
describes when an uncertain tax item should be recorded in the financial
statements and for how much, provides guidance on recording interest and
penalties and accounting and reporting for income taxes in interim periods.
FIN 48 was effective for the Companys year beginning January 1,
2007. The adoption of FIN 48 had no
effect on the amounts previously recognized for income taxes. See Note 3 of notes to consolidated financial
statements for further discussion on income taxes.
In September 2006,
the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair
Value Measurements,
which defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 are effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007.
The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of SFAS No. 157
will have on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
In February 2007,
the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 115
. SFAS No. 159 permits
entities to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election
dates and report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value
option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS No. 159
is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The
Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of SFAS No. 159 will have on
its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
In December 2007,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141(revised) Business Combinations.
Statement No. 141(R) applies to all business combinations. Under SFAS
No. 141(R) an entity is required to recognize the assets acquired,
liabilities assumed, contractual contingencies, and contingent consideration at
their fair values on the acquisition date. We are required to adopt this
statement starting in 2009 and it is to be applied to business combinations
occurring in 2009 and after. Early adoption of this statement is prohibited. The Company is evaluating the impact the
adoption of SFAS No. 141 (R) will have on its consolidated results of
operations and financial condition.
In December 2007,
the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements. Statement No. 160 applies to the accounting for
noncontrolling interests and transactions with noncontrolling interest holders
in consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 160 changes the accounting
and reporting for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as
noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. We are
required to adopt this statement beginning in 2009. Early adoption of this
21
statement
is prohibited and we are currently in the process of evaluating the effect that
this statement will have on our consolidated results of operations and
financial condition.
CONTINGENCIES
In
connection with the purchase of the Racetrack, the Company entered into an Earn
Out Promissory Note dated March 29, 1994. In accordance with the Earn Out
Note, if (i) off-track betting becomes legally permissible in the State of
Minnesota and (ii) we begin to conduct off-track betting with respect to
or in connection with its operations, we will be required to pay to the IMR
Fund, L.P. the greater of $700,000 per operating year as defined, or 20% of the
net pretax profit as defined, for each of five operating years. At this time, we believe that the likelihood
that these two conditions will be met and that we will be required to pay these
amounts is remote. At the date (if any)
that these two conditions are met, the five minimum payments will be discounted
back to their present value and the sum of those discounted payments will be
capitalized as part of the purchase price in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. The purchase
price will be further increased if payments become due under the 20% of Net
Pretax Profit calculation. The first
payment is to be made 90 days after the end of the third operating year in
which off-track betting is conducted by us.
Remaining payments would be made within 90 days of the end of each of
the next four operating years.
The
Company is periodically involved in various legal actions arising in the normal
course of business. At December 31,
2007, management believes that the resolution of any legal actions outstanding
will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
OPERATIONS REVIEW
YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006
OPERATING REVENUES
Total net operating
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007 were $52.9 million, a
decrease of $2,960,000, or 5.3%,
compared to total operating revenues of $55.8 million for the year ended December 31,
2006. Total Card Club revenues decreased
5.1%, pari-mutuel revenues decreased 7.2% and concession revenues remained
relatively unchanged in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006. Discussions of pari-mutuel and Card Club
revenues follow.
SUMMARY OF PARI-MUTUEL OPERATING DATA:
|
|
Year Ended
12/31/07
|
|
Year Ended
12/31/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Racing
Days
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simulcast only
days
|
|
296
|
|
296
|
|
Live and
simulcast days
|
|
68
|
|
68
|
|
Total
Racing Days
|
|
364
|
|
364
|
|
On-Track
Handle
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simulcast handle
on non-live race days
|
|
$
|
37,906,000
|
|
$
|
41,291,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simulcast handle
on live race days
|
|
15,912,000
|
|
16,772,000
|
|
Total simulcast
handle
|
|
53,818,000
|
|
58,063,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Live racing
handle
|
|
15,375,000
|
|
16,877,000
|
|
Total
On-Track Handle
|
|
69,193,000
|
|
74,940,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Out-of-state
Live Handle
|
|
19,572,000
|
|
19,246,000
|
|
Total
Handle
|
|
$
|
88,765,000
|
|
$
|
94,186,000
|
|
On-Track
Average Daily Handle
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simulcast only
days
|
|
$
|
128,000
|
|
$
|
139,500
|
|
Live and
simulcast days
|
|
460,000
|
|
495,000
|
|
22
Pari-mutuel revenues include commission and breakage
revenues on live on-track and simulcast racing, fees received from out-of-state
racetracks for wagering on our live races and proceeds from uncashed winning
tickets. Pari-mutuel revenues decreased
to $15.2 million from $16.4 million in 2006, primarily reflecting a decrease in
on-track live racing and simulcast handle in 2007 compared to 2006.
Total handle wagered on simulcast races in 2007
decreased $4,245,000, or 7.3%, compared to 2006. Lower patron wagering can be partially
attributed to growing competition from Internet wagering considered to be
illegal in the state of Minnesota. Also,
the general downturn in economic conditions during 2007 and the unfavorable
legislation severely restricting smoking in all public places in Minnesota,
which became effective October 1, 2007, has resulted in lower handle.
On-track live handle decreased by $1,502,000, or 8.9%,
for the 2007 live meet compared to the live meet in 2006 due partly to the fact
that in 2007, the Company offered 30 fewer races to achieve the desired purse
structure. Also, in 2007, Canterbury
Park did not hold the Claiming Crown event, which resulted in less on-track
handle being recorded compared to the same weekend in 2006 in which the
Claiming Crown was held.
Wagering at out-of-state tracks on races conducted at
the Racetrack during the 2007 live meet increased $326,000, or 1.7%, compared
to the 2006 meet primarily due to increased wagering at certain out-of-state
locations.
Revenues recognized on
proceeds from winning pari-mutuel tickets which were not presented for payment
within one year of the end of the respective race meets decreased approximately
$25,000 in 2007 compared to 2006, primarily due to reduced amounts wagered on
simulcast horse races.
SUMMARY OF CARD CLUB REVENUES:
|
|
Year Ended
12/31/07
|
|
Year Ended
12/31/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poker Games
|
|
$
|
17,753,000
|
|
$
|
18,281,000
|
|
Casino Games
|
|
9,740,000
|
|
10,948,000
|
|
Total Collection
Revenue
|
|
27,493,000
|
|
29,229,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Revenue
|
|
1,126,000
|
|
939,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Card Club
Revenue
|
|
$
|
28,619,000
|
|
$
|
30,168,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Days
Offered
|
|
364
|
|
364
|
|
Average Revenue
per Day
|
|
$
|
78,600
|
|
$
|
82,900
|
|
The primary source of Card Club revenue is a
percentage of the wagers received from the players as compensation for
providing the Card Club facility and services, referred to as collection
revenue. Other Revenue presented above
includes fees collected for the administration of tournaments and amounts
earned as reimbursement for the administrative costs of maintaining the jackpot
funds.
The
Card Club is divided into two areas, the poker area and the casino games
area. The average daily collection
amount per game is dependent upon the number of tables utilized to offer the
game. Patron demand determines the
number of tables to be used for a specific game. Since December 2005, there have been a
total of 34 tables in the poker area and 16 tables in the casino games area.
Total Card Club revenue
decreased $1,549,000, or 5.1%, compared to 2006. The decrease in Card Club revenue is due
primarily to the decrease in casino games revenue of $1,208,000, or 11.0%, in
2007 over 2006. Casino games revenue has
decreased as a result of the unfavorable smoking legislation that went into
effect on October 1, 2007. Tribal
casinos located in Minnesota are not bound by this legislation and will
continue
23
to
offer various gaming alternatives in an environment that allows smoking. Revenue in the poker room also decreased
$528,000, or 2.8%, in 2007 over 2006 primarily as a result of this legislation.
Card Club revenues represent 54.1% and 54.0% of net
revenues for 2007 and 2006, respectively.
We expect that competition from Internet wagering and
tribal casinos will continue to put pressure on Card Club operating revenues in
future periods. Also, the Company
anticipates an unfavorable impact due to new competition in the card club and
casino games industry with the opening of the harness racetrack. As a result, we continue to search for
opportunities to make Canterbury Park the most attractive alternative when our
customers want to wager on card games.
Concession revenues remained relatively stable in
2007, $6,077,000 compared to $6,049,000 in 2006.
The Company experienced an increase in admission and
parking revenues due to fewer days of free admission being offered. Publication sales revenues slightly decreased
due to the decrease in the amount of pari-mutuel wagering.
Other operating revenue
decreased $293,000, or 12.7%, to $2,019,000 in fiscal year 2007 compared to
2006. The decrease in 2007 was due
primarily to a decrease in the corporate sponsorships and advertising revenues
of $97,000, a decrease in the gain on sale of assets of $85,000, and a decrease
in cash services fees of $51,000 resulting from decreased patronage in the Card
Club. Promotional allowances remained relatively stable year-over-year but
increased as a percentage in total net revenues due to the addition of a player
tracking system that allows the Company to now offer promotional awards to
players in the poker room in addition to those already being offered in the
casino games room.
OPERATING
EXPENSES
Total operating expenses decreased approximately
$1,937,000, or 3.8%, to $48,723,000 in 2007, from $50,660,000 in 2006 primarily
due to decreases in statutory purses, salaries, wages and benefit costs,
advertising and marketing and insurance. See below for a detailed
quantification of each of these items.
Total operating expenses as a percentage of net revenues increased to
92.1% from 90.7% in 2006. We experienced a decrease in pari-mutuel and card
club revenues in 2007. As a result,
despite decreases in variable pari-mutuel expenses, salaries and benefits, and
purse expenses, operating expenses became a larger percentage of total
revenues.
Total purse expense
decreased $467,000, or 5.3%, in 2007 compared to 2006 as presented in the table
below. Minnesota law requires us to
allocate a portion of funds received from betting in the Card Club and wagering
on simulcast and live horse races for future payment as purses for live horse
races or other uses of Minnesotas horsepersons associations. Purse expense relates to card club, simulcast,
and live racing. A description of how
the purse expense is calculated for these three expenses is given below. The decline in Card Club revenues in 2007
compared to 2006 resulted in the decreases in Card Club purse and MBF expense
shown in the table below. Total purse
expense associated with simulcast racing decreased in 2007 compared to 2006 due
to lower wagering levels. We experienced
a decrease in live racing purse expense, which is attributable to lower
on-track wagering.
|
|
Purse Expense
|
|
Minnesota Breeders Fund
Expense
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Card Club
|
|
$
|
3,864,000
|
|
$
|
4,073,000
|
|
$
|
429,000
|
|
$
|
453,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simulcast Racing
|
|
2,976,000
|
|
3,043,000
|
|
600,000
|
|
646,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Live Racing
|
|
1,505,000
|
|
1,696,000
|
|
154,000
|
|
169,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,345,000
|
|
$
|
8,812,000
|
|
$
|
1,183,000
|
|
$
|
1,268,000
|
|
24
While we are obligated
by state law to pay up to 14% of Card Club revenues to the purse fund and MBF, pursuant
to an agreement with the MHBPA, we paid a total of 15% of total Card Club
revenues to these funds in 2007 and 2006.
The amounts paid are allocated 90% to the purse funds and 10% to the
MBF.
The amounts paid to the
purse fund for simulcast racing differ depending upon whether the simulcast
wagering occurs during the Racing Season, a statutorily defined 25-week
period beginning in early May each year, or outside of the Racing
Season. We paid an average of 5.53% of
handle to the purse fund in 2007, compared to 5.24% in 2006. We pay 5.50% of pari-mutuel simulcast
commission revenues to the MBF; consequently, lower revenues result in lower
MBF expense.
Minnesota law generally
provides that a minimum of 8.4% of the on-track live racing handle be paid to
the purse fund. The amount paid to the
purse fund for wagers at out-of-state racetracks is 50% of the net of fees
collected less costs incurred to provide the uplink signal. We pay 1.0% of on-track live handle to the
MBF.
We also experienced a
reduction in host fees of $117,000, or 5.4%, in 2007 compared to 2006 due to
lower wagering experienced in 2007 compared to 2006.
Salary and benefit
expenses decreased by $888,000, or 4.0%, for the twelve months ended December 31,
2007 compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. The decrease in salaries and benefits expense
is primarily attributable to a reduction in force initiative that was
implemented during 2007. Wages directly
related to non full-time employees decreased $447,000 due to general efforts to
control labor costs in that area. In
addition, the cost of providing health and medical benefits to our employees
decreased by $170,000 in 2007 compared to 2006 as a result of this initiative.
Depreciation expense increased $165,000, or 9.0%, in
2007 compared to 2006 and reflects significant investments in our facilities
during the past several years. Beginning
in late 2004, we have continually added improvements to the stable area and
training facilities. We have made
various other investments in building improvements and furniture, fixtures and
equipment in both 2007 and 2006.
Utilities expense increased $166,000, or 12.0%, in
2007 primarily due to higher energy costs for electricity and natural gas
compared to 2006.
The Company experienced
decreases in repair and maintenance of $87,000 and a decrease in advertising
and marketing expenses of $251,000 primarily due to focused efforts on expense
reduction in 2007 compared to 2006.
Insurance expense
decreased $165,000, or 14.7%, in 2007 compared to 2006. The decrease is attributable to rate
decreases, lower volumes of business activity and a decrease in labor costs for
the company in 2007.
Net other income
increased $50,000, or 17.9%, in 2007 compared to 2006. This increase is primarily attributable to a
$45,000 increase in interest income on our primary bank account balance during
2007. The average balance in our primary
cash account increased throughout 2007 compared to 2006, although the interest
rate earned on those balances decreased from 4.39% at the end of 2006 to 3.29%
at the end of 2007.
Income tax expense
as a percentage of pre-tax income decreased to 41.6% for the year ended December 31,
2007 from 42.8% for the year ended December 31, 2006. The decrease is
primarily attributable to a reduced level of non-deductible lobbying expenses
in 2007 compared to 2006.
As a result of all
of the above, net income decreased $504,000, or 16.1%, to $2,621,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $3,125,000 for the year ended December 31,
2006.
25
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At December 31, 2007, we had cash and cash
equivalents of $7.0 million compared to $5.7 million at December 31,
2006. This $1,300,000 increase consists
of $4.6 million net cash provided by operating activities, offset by $2.1
million net cash used in investing activities and $1.2 million net cash used in
financing activities. In addition, as of
December 31, 2007, we had $2.25 million of capacity under a commercial
revolving credit line as part of a general credit and security agreement with
Bremer Bank. In April 2007, this
agreement was renewed for an additional one-year term. We had no borrowings under the credit line in
2007 or 2006.
Our three largest sources of revenue, pari-mutuel
wagering, card club operations and concessions, are all based on cash
transactions. Consequently, we have
significant inflows of cash on a daily basis.
We designate cash balances which will be required to satisfy certain short-term
liabilities such as progressive jackpots, the player pool and amounts due
horsemen for purses and awards as restricted.
The Companys Casino Games are required by law to be unbanked. Unbanked refers to a wagering system or
game where wagers lost or won by the host are accumulated into a player
pool liability for purposes of enhancing the total amount paid back to players
in any other card game. The Company may
only serve as custodian of the player pool.
It may not have an active interest in any card game and does not
recognize net wins or losses as revenue.
The Company is required to return accumulated player pool funds to the
players through giveaways, promotional items, prizes or by other means. The player pool liability was approximately
$833,000 at December 31, 2007 compared to $137,000 at December 31,
2006.
The Card Club offers progressive jackpots for Poker
games. Amounts collected for these
jackpot funds are accrued as liabilities until paid to winners. At December 31, 2007, accrued jackpot
funds totaled approximately $742,000 compared to $897,000 at December 31,
2006. The MRC regulates the operation
of the player pool and progressive jackpot pools. These liabilities have the potential for
significant fluctuation on a daily basis.
All games in the Card Club are played using
chips. The value of chips issued and
outstanding, referred to as the outstanding chip liability, was approximately
$248,000 at December 31, 2007, compared to $226,000 at December 31,
2006. This liability has the potential for significant fluctuation on a daily
basis depending upon the demand for chip redemptions and sales.
Our second largest
operating expense item is purse expense.
Pursuant to an agreement with the MHBPA, we transferred into a trust
account or paid directly to the MHBPA approximately $7,575,000 and $7,825,000
in purse funds for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Minnesota Statutes specify
that amounts transferred into trust are the property of the trust and not the
Company. Unpaid purse fund obligations
due the MHBPA were $56,951 and $140,281 at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. The weighted average
interest rates on any purses accrued but not transferred into the trust were
7.25% and 8.25% at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Unrestricted cash
balances at December 31, 2007 were $7,050,389 compared to $5,745,556 at December 31,
2006. The Company believes that the funds available in its cash accounts,
amounts available under the general credit and security agreement, along with
funds generated from operations, will be sufficient to satisfy its liquidity
and capital resource requirements for regular operations for the foreseeable
future.
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net cash provided by
operations during the year ended December 31, 2007 was $4,608,025, which
resulted primarily from net income of $2,620,740, depreciation of $1,999,006,
and an increase in card club accruals of $340,433, offset by a decrease in
income taxes payable of $321,512. Card
club accruals increased primarily due to a reduction in promotions that were
offered in 2007. The decrease in income
taxes payable was a result of the Company having decreased net income in 2007,
resulting in overpayments of income tax.
Net cash provided by operations during the year ended December 31,
2006 was $5,973,305, which resulted primarily from net income of $3,125,043,
depreciation of $1,834,012, an increase in accounts payable
26
and accrued wages and payroll taxes of $498,704, an increase in
stock-based compensation expense of $239,428 and a decrease in restricted cash
of $73,925. The increase in accounts
payable and accrued wages and payroll taxes includes an increase of $320,478 in
accrued wages and payroll taxes and an increase of $178,226 in accounts payable
and accruals. Year-end payroll accruals
increased $331,000 due to an increase in the number of days payable as of
year-end 2006. The increase in accounts
payable is primarily due to increases in payables to other racetracks for fees
and settlements of $100,000 and to an increase in trade payables and expense
accruals of $47,000, and an increase of $28,196 representing the net effect of
non-cash investing activities for additions to land, buildings and equipment
funded through accounts payable during the year ended December 31,
2006. The decrease in restricted cash
results primarily from a decrease of $305,000 in the player pool, attributable
to an increase in promotions and giveaways to patrons during the fourth quarter
of 2006, partially offset by an increase in the progressive jackpot pools of
$218,000.
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31,
2007 totaled $2,138,871 and primarily reflects capital improvements to
buildings and land, including the backside barns and a mutuel island remodel,
and additions to furniture and equipment, including new boilers, digital video
equipment and a player tracking system in the Card Club.
Cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31,
2006 totaled $4,000,467 and primarily reflects capital improvements to
buildings and land, including a new Card Club lounge area and backside barns,
and additions to furniture and equipment, including a video messaging display
for the racetrack infield.
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net cash used in
financing activities was $1,164,321 for the year ended December 31, 2007
compared to cash used in financing activities of $1,066,648 for the year ended December 31,
2006. The 2007 net cash outflows resulted primarily from a $.25 per share cash
dividend totaling $1,027,696 paid in July 2007. In addition, during the second half of 2007
and pursuant to a Stock Repurchase Plan approved in November 2006, the
Company repurchased 46,950 shares of common stock at an average price of $11.59
per share for a total price of $544,110.
These outflows were partially offset by proceeds of $338,934 received
upon the issuance of common stock due to the exercise of stock options and
shares of common stock purchased by employees pursuant to our Employee Stock
Purchase Plan and the related excess tax benefit of $68,551.
Cash used in financing
activities was $1,066,648 for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to
cash used in financing activities of $200,762 for the year ended December 31,
2005. The 2006 net cash outflows resulted primarily from a $.25 per share cash
dividend totaling $1,010,796 paid in July 2006. In addition, on December 6, 2006,
pursuant to a Stock Repurchase Plan approved in November 2006, the Company
repurchased 53,050 shares of common stock at a price of $13.10 per share for a
total price of $694,955. These outflows were partially offset by proceeds of
$532,956 received upon the issuance of common stock due to the exercise of
stock options and shares of common stock purchased by employees pursuant to our
Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the related excess tax benefit of $106,147.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The Company currently
has no off-balance sheet arrangements and has no intent to enter into any such
agreements in the near future.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
In
January 2004, the Company entered into a five-year totalizator services
agreement with Scientific Games Inc. (formerly Autotote Systems, Inc.). Pursuant to the agreement, Scientific Games
provides totalizator equipment and computer programs which record and process
all wagers and calculate odds and payoffs.
Amounts charged to operations under this agreement for the years ended December 31,
2007 and 2006 were approximately $315,000 and $342,000, respectively. During annual live race meets, Scientific
Games provides uplink services, which enables the Company to simulcast horse
races held at Canterbury Park to out-of-state
27
racetracks. These services resulted in amounts charged to
operations in 2007 and 2006 of approximately $136,000 and $138,000,
respectively. Effective March 1,
2008, the company renegotiated its totalizator services agreement with
Scientific Games and entered into a six-year agreement with Scientific Games,
whereby the performance of Scientific Games remains consistent with what is
described above.
We have entered into operating leases for rental
of office equipment and equipment to print certain publications. Amounts charged to operations under these
agreements for the years ended December 31, 2007, and December 31,
2006 were approximately $94,000 and $96,000, respectively. All such leases expire on or before April 30,
2010.
Since December 31, 2007, there have been no
material changes outside the ordinary course of business to our contractual
obligations as set forth above. As of December 31,
2007, we had no borrowings pursuant to our line of credit and were not party to
capital lease obligations, significant purchase obligations or other long-term
obligations.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
From
time to time, in reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in
press releases, and in other communications to shareholders or the investing
public, we may make forward-looking statements concerning possible or
anticipated future financial performance, prospective business activities or
plans which are typically preceded by words such as believes, expects, anticipates,
intends or similar expressions. For
such forward-looking statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for
forward-looking statements contained in federal securities laws. Shareholders and the investing public should
understand that such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and
uncertainties which could affect our actual results, and cause actual results
to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are
not limited to: material fluctuations in attendance at the Racetrack, material
changes in the level of wagering by patrons, decline in interest in the
unbanked card games offered at the Card Club, competition from other venues
offering unbanked card games, or other forms of wagering, competition from
other sports and entertainment options, costs associated with our efforts to
obtain legislative authority for additional gaming options, increases in compensation
and employee benefit costs; increases in the percentage of revenues allocated
for purse fund payments; higher than expected expense related to new marketing
initiatives; the impact of wagering products and technologies introduced by
competitors; legislative and regulatory decisions and changes; the general
health of the gaming sector; and other factors that are beyond our ability to
control or predict.
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES
ABOUT MARKET RISK
Canterbury Park is not required to provide the
information requested by this Item as it qualifies as a smaller reporting
company.
28
Item 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
(a)
Financial Statements
The following financial
statements of the Company are set forth on pages 30 through 46 of the Form 10-K:
29
MANAGEMENTS
REPORT ON COMPANYS INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management is responsible
for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over
financial reporting of the Company. This system is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The Companys internal control
over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors
of the Company; (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or
timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
Companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent
limitations, internal control over financial reporting can only provide
reasonable assurance and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to
the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
Management conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the system of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. In making this evaluation,
management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in
Internal Control Integrated Framework.
Based on managements
evaluation and those criteria, management concluded that the Companys system
of internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31,
2007.
This annual report does
not include an attestation report of the companys registered public accounting
firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report
was not subject to attestation by the Companys registered public accounting
firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission
that permit the company to provide only managements report in this annual
report.
Date: March 31, 2008
|
/s/ Randall D. Sampson
|
|
|
Randall D. Sampson
|
|
|
President
and
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
Date: March 31, 2008
|
/s/ David C. Hansen
|
|
|
David C. Hansen
|
|
|
Vice
President and
|
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
Further discussion of the
Companys internal controls and procedures is included in Item 9A(T) of
this report, under the caption Controls and Procedures.
30
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors
and Stockholders of
Canterbury Park Holding
Corporation
Shakopee, Minnesota
We have audited the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Canterbury Park Holding Corporation
and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash
flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2007. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits
in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged
to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our
audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances,
but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no
such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe
that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such
consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of Canterbury Park Holding Corporation and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the results of their operations and
their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31,
2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
Deloitte &
Touche LLP
March 27, 2008
Minneapolis, Minnesota
31
CANTERBURY PARK HOLDING
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
7,050,389
|
|
$
|
5,745,556
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
2,032,632
|
|
1,915,057
|
|
Short-term
investments
|
|
80,688
|
|
78,231
|
|
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance of $46,400 and $38,600, respectively
|
|
749,782
|
|
559,146
|
|
Inventory
|
|
169,801
|
|
159,918
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
453,350
|
|
733,979
|
|
Income taxes
receivable
|
|
215,594
|
|
|
|
Deferred income
taxes (Note 3)
|
|
295,900
|
|
235,200
|
|
Total current
assets
|
|
11,048,136
|
|
9,427,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
20,000
|
|
20,000
|
|
Land, buildings
and equipment, net (Note 2)
|
|
25,037,636
|
|
24,903,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,105,772
|
|
$
|
34,351,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
2,209,639
|
|
$
|
2,032,953
|
|
Card club
accruals
|
|
2,413,796
|
|
2,073,363
|
|
Accrued wages
and payroll taxes
|
|
1,851,140
|
|
1,866,633
|
|
Accrued interest
payable
|
|
5,196
|
|
7,303
|
|
Due to MHBPA
(Note 1)
|
|
56,951
|
|
140,281
|
|
Accrued property
taxes
|
|
491,630
|
|
457,331
|
|
Income taxes
payable
|
|
|
|
105,918
|
|
Payable to
horsepersons
|
|
162,931
|
|
346,779
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
7,191,283
|
|
7,030,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEFERRED INCOME
TAXES (Note 3)
|
|
336,400
|
|
460,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES (Notes 8 and 9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY (Notes 4 and 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock,
$.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, 4,084,087 and 4,050,782,
respectively, shares issued and outstanding
|
|
40,841
|
|
40,508
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
15,395,778
|
|
14,914,328
|
|
Accumulated
earnings
|
|
13,141,470
|
|
11,904,736
|
|
Total
stockholders equity
|
|
28,578,089
|
|
26,859,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,105,772
|
|
$
|
34,351,033
|
|
See notes to consolidated
financial statements.
32
CANTERBURY PARK HOLDING
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2007 AND 2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING
REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pari-mutuel
|
|
$
|
15,240,131
|
|
$
|
16,432,014
|
|
Card Club
|
|
28,619,331
|
|
30,168,349
|
|
Concessions
|
|
6,077,176
|
|
6,049,334
|
|
Admissions and
parking
|
|
726,941
|
|
668,235
|
|
Publications
|
|
466,267
|
|
475,886
|
|
Other operating
revenue
|
|
2,018,571
|
|
2,311,716
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
53,148,417
|
|
56,105,534
|
|
Less Promotional
allowances
|
|
(268,861
|
)
|
(265,837
|
)
|
Net Revenues
|
|
52,879,556
|
|
55,839,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING
EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purses
|
|
8,344,707
|
|
8,811,943
|
|
Minnesota
Breeders Fund
|
|
1,183,487
|
|
1,267,656
|
|
Host track fees
|
|
2,041,139
|
|
2,158,267
|
|
Pari-mutuel
taxes
|
|
128,564
|
|
210,886
|
|
Salaries and
benefits
|
|
21,526,015
|
|
22,414,363
|
|
Cost of
concessions and publication sales
|
|
3,455,449
|
|
3,438,597
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
1,999,006
|
|
1,834,012
|
|
Utilities
|
|
1,548,273
|
|
1,382,356
|
|
Repairs,
maintenance and supplies
|
|
1,213,330
|
|
1,300,566
|
|
License fees and
property taxes
|
|
810,018
|
|
786,153
|
|
Advertising and
marketing
|
|
1,592,930
|
|
1,843,832
|
|
Insurance
|
|
957,075
|
|
1,122,266
|
|
Other operating
expenses
|
|
3,923,325
|
|
4,089,266
|
|
Total Operating
Expenses
|
|
48,723,318
|
|
50,660,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER (EXPENSE)
INCOME:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
(Note 7)
|
|
(3,863
|
)
|
(1,521
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
333,066
|
|
280,729
|
|
Net Other Income
|
|
329,203
|
|
279,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
|
|
4,485,441
|
|
5,458,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax
expense (Note 3)
|
|
(1,864,701
|
)
|
(2,333,699
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$
|
2,620,740
|
|
$
|
3,125,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
|
|
4,062,866
|
|
4,000,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC NET INCOME
PER COMMON SHARE (Note 6)
|
|
$
|
.65
|
|
$
|
.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED NET
INCOME PER COMMON SHARE (Note 6)
|
|
$
|
.62
|
|
$
|
.74
|
|
See notes to consolidated
financial statements.
33
CANTERBURY PARK HOLDING
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND
2006
|
|
Number
of Shares
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
|
Accumulated
Earnings
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2005
|
|
3,959,885
|
|
$
|
39,599
|
|
$
|
14,045,248
|
|
$
|
10,273,244
|
|
$
|
24,358,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividend
paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,010,796
|
)
|
(1,010,796
|
)
|
Exercise of
stock options and issuance of restricted stock and stock options
|
|
126,400
|
|
1,264
|
|
680,808
|
|
|
|
682,072
|
|
Tax benefit of
stock option exercises
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,199
|
|
|
|
177,199
|
|
Common stock
repurchase
|
|
(53,050
|
)
|
(530
|
)
|
(211,670
|
)
|
(482,755
|
)
|
(694,955
|
)
|
Shares issued
under Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
7,501
|
|
75
|
|
90,237
|
|
|
|
90,312
|
|
Shares issued
under Employee Stock Ownership Plan
|
|
10,046
|
|
100
|
|
132,506
|
|
|
|
132,606
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,125,043
|
|
3,125,043
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2006
|
|
4,050,782
|
|
$
|
40,508
|
|
$
|
14,914,328
|
|
$
|
11,904,736
|
|
$
|
26,859,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividend
paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,027,696
|
)
|
(1,027,696
|
)
|
Exercise of
stock options and issuance of restricted stock and stock options
|
|
75,650
|
|
756
|
|
506,717
|
|
|
|
507,473
|
|
Tax benefit of
stock option exercises
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,413
|
|
|
|
103,413
|
|
Common stock
repurchase
|
|
(46,950
|
)
|
(469
|
)
|
(187,331
|
)
|
(356,310
|
)
|
(544,110
|
)
|
Shares issued
under Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
5,105
|
|
51
|
|
58,656
|
|
|
|
58,707
|
|
Forfeited
restricted shares
|
|
(500
|
)
|
(5
|
)
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,620,740
|
|
2,620,740
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
|
4,084,087
|
|
$
|
40,841
|
|
$
|
15,395,778
|
|
$
|
13,141,470
|
|
$
|
28,578,089
|
|
See notes to consolidated
financial statements.
34
CANTERBURY PARK HOLDING
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2007 AND 2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Operating
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2,620,740
|
|
$
|
3,125,043
|
|
Adjustments to
reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
1,999,006
|
|
1,834,012
|
|
Stockbased
compensation expense
|
|
227,281
|
|
239,428
|
|
Excess tax
benefit from exercise of stock options
|
|
(68,551
|
)
|
(106,147
|
)
|
Loss (gain) on
sale of land, buildings & equipment
|
|
10,526
|
|
(74,480
|
)
|
Contribution of
common stock to ESOP
|
|
|
|
132,606
|
|
(Decrease)
increase in deferred income taxes
|
|
(81,787
|
)
|
13,199
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in accounts receivable
|
|
(190,636
|
)
|
137,711
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in restricted cash
|
|
(117,575
|
)
|
73,925
|
|
Decrease in
other current assets
|
|
270,746
|
|
28,549
|
|
(Decrease)
increase in income taxes payable
|
|
(321,512
|
)
|
39,810
|
|
Increase in
accounts payable and accrued wages & payroll taxes
|
|
154,340
|
|
498,704
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in card club accruals
|
|
340,433
|
|
(48,970
|
)
|
Decrease in
accrued interest
|
|
(2,107
|
)
|
|
|
Increase in
accrued property taxes
|
|
34,299
|
|
53,974
|
|
Decrease in
payable to horsepersons
|
|
(183,848
|
)
|
(19,487
|
)
|
(Decrease)
increase in due to MHBPA
|
|
(83,330
|
)
|
45,428
|
|
Net cash
provided by operations
|
|
4,608,025
|
|
5,973,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to
land, buildings and equipment
|
|
(2,144,144
|
)
|
(4,071,716
|
)
|
Proceeds from
sale of equipment
|
|
7,730
|
|
74,480
|
|
Increase in
short-term investments
|
|
(2,457
|
)
|
(3,231
|
)
|
Net cash used in
investing activities
|
|
(2,138,871
|
)
|
(4,000,467
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from
issuance of common stock
|
|
338,934
|
|
532,956
|
|
Common stock
repurchase
|
|
(544,110
|
)
|
(694,955
|
)
|
Cash dividend to
shareholders
|
|
(1,027,696
|
)
|
(1,010,796
|
)
|
Excess tax
benefit from exercise of stock options
|
|
68,551
|
|
106,147
|
|
Net cash used in
financing activities
|
|
(1,164,321
|
)
|
(1,066,648
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in
cash
|
|
1,304,833
|
|
906,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at
beginning of year
|
|
5,745,556
|
|
4,839,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of
year
|
|
$
|
7,050,389
|
|
$
|
5,745,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosure of non-cash investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to
land, buildings and equipment funded through accounts payable
|
|
$
|
94,198
|
|
$
|
87,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
paid, net of refunds
|
|
$
|
2,268,000
|
|
$
|
2,225,000
|
|
See notes to consolidated
financial statements.
35
CANTERBURY PARK HOLDING
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND
2006
1.
SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Business
- Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (the Company) was incorporated on March 24,
1994. On March 29, 1994 the Company acquired all the outstanding
securities of Jacobs Realty, Inc. (JRI) from Irwin Jacobs and IMR Fund,
L.P. (an investment fund for various pension plans and trusts). JRI was merged
into the Company and the acquisition was accounted for under the purchase
method of accounting whereby the acquired assets and liabilities have been
recorded at the Companys cost. The primary asset of JRI was Canterbury Downs
Racetrack and the 325 acres of surrounding land.
On May 20,
1994, the Company adopted a plan of Reorganization pursuant to which the sole
shareholder of Canterbury Park Concessions, Inc. (CPC), and majority
shareholder of the Company, agreed to exchange his shares of CPC stock for
198,888 shares of the Companys common stock concurrent with the closing of a
public offering. Pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, CPC became a wholly
owned subsidiary of the Company in August 1994 when the Company completed
the initial public offering of its common stock. This reorganization was
treated in a manner similar to a pooling of interests. Net proceeds received by
the Company from the public offering were approximately $4,847,000, which along
with additional borrowings under the Companys line of credit with the majority
shareholder, were used to pay off the remaining notes payable from the
acquisition of JRI.
The consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of the Company, CPC and Shakopee
Valley RV Park Acquisition Company, LLC after elimination of intercompany accounts
and transactions.
Revenue
Recognition -
Our
revenues are derived primarily from the operations of a Card Club, pari-mutuel
wagering on simulcast and live horse races, concession sales and related
activities. Collection revenue from Card Club operations and pari-mutuel
commission and fee revenues are recognized at the time that the wagering
process is complete. Revenues related to wagering activities including
concession and publication sales, and parking and admission fees are recognized
as revenue when the service has been performed or the product has been
delivered.
Estimates
- The
preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from these estimates.
Restricted
Cash
Restricted cash represents refundable deposits and
amounts due to horsemen for purses, stakes and awards, and amounts accumulated
in card game progressive jackpot pools, the Player Pool and Poker Promotional
Fund to be used to repay card players in the form of promotions, giveaways,
prizes, or by other means.
Uncashed
Winning Tickets
Pari-mutuel tickets which are not cashed
within one year of the end of the respective race meet become the property of
the Company. The Company records revenue associated with the uncashed winning
tickets at the time that, based on historical experience, management can
reasonably estimate the amount of additional winning tickets from a race meet
that will be presented for payment.
Promotional Allowances
The Company offers certain promotional
allowances at no charge to patrons who participate in our player rewards
program. The retail value of these promotional items is shown as a deduction from
total revenues on the Companys consolidated statements of operations.
Pari-mutuel
Taxes
The
first $12 million of pari-mutuel revenue is exempt from the 6% pari-mutuel tax.
Pari-mutuel taxes are estimated for each 12-month period from July 1
through June 30, and an estimated annual effective tax rate is applied to
all pari-mutuel commission revenues.
Due to
Minnesota Horsemens Benevolent and Protective Association, Inc. (MHBPA)
- The Minnesota Pari-Mutuel Horse Racing Act specifies that the Company is
required to segregate a portion of funds (recorded as purse expense in the
statements of operations), received from card club operations and
36
wagering on
simulcast and live horse races, for future payment as purses for live horse
races or other uses of the horsepersons associations. Pursuant to an agreement
with the MHBPA, the Company has transferred into a trust account or paid
directly to the MHBPA, approximately $7,575,000 and $7,825,000 for the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, related to thoroughbred
races. Minnesota Statutes specify that amounts transferred into the trust
account are the property of the trust and not of the Company. The interest
rates on any purses accrued but not transferred into the trust were 7.25% and
8.25% at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets -
Management of the Company periodically
reviews the carrying value of property and equipment for potential impairment
by comparing the carrying value of these assets with their related expected
future net cash flows. Should the sum of the related expected future net cash
flows be less than the carrying value, management will determine whether an
impairment loss should be recognized. An impairment loss would be measured by
the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds the fair value of
the asset. To date, management has determined that no impairment of these
assets exists.
Depreciation
- Buildings and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the
estimated useful lives of the assets, generally 5 to 39 years.
Card
Club Accruals
Minnesota law allows
the Company to collect amounts from patrons to fund progressive jackpot pools
in the Card Club. These amounts, along with amounts earned by the player pool,
promotional pools and the outstanding chip liability, are accrued as short-term
liabilities at each balance sheet date.
Income
Taxes
- Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and
liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the
estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and
their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured
using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary
differences are expected to reverse.
The Company
adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
interpretation of FASB No. 109,
(FIN 48), on January 1,
2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with FASB
Statement 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes,
and
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be
taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition. Interest and penalties associated with uncertain
income tax positions are presented in income tax expense. The Company has not
recorded any significant income tax related interest or penalties during any of
the periods presented. Upon implementation, we determined all recorded benefits
and income tax positions were more-likely-than-not. Therefore, no cumulative
effect relating to the adoption of FIN 48 was recorded. See Note 3 of
notes to consolidated financial statements for further discussion on income
taxes.
Net
Income Per Share
- Basic net income per common share is based
on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each year. Diluted
net income per common share takes into effect the dilutive effect of potential
common shares outstanding. The Companys only potential common shares
outstanding are stock options and shares of unvested restricted stock.
Comprehensive
Income
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 130,
Reporting Comprehensive Income,
establishes
standards for reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components
in a full set of financial statements. Comprehensive income includes all
changes in stockholders equity except those resulting from investments by and
distributions to owners. SFAS No. 130 is not currently applicable for the
Company because the Company did not have any items of other comprehensive
income in any of the periods presented.
Fair
Values of Financial Instruments
Due to the current classification of all financial instruments of the Company
and given the short-term nature of the related account balances, carrying
amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets approximate fair value.
Stock
Based Employee Compensation
- In December 2004, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) revised SFAS No.123, Share Based
Payment (SFAS No. 123R). This Statement supercedes APB Opinion No. 25,
which resulted in no stock-based employee compensation cost related to stock
options if
37
the options
granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying
common stock on the date of grant. SFAS No. 123R requires recognition of
employee services provided in exchange for a share-based payment based on the
grant date fair market value. In April 2005 the effective date of SFAS No. 123R
was deferred to the fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005. Consequently,
the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R as of January 1, 2006. As of the
effective date, this Statement applies to all new awards issued as well as
awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled. Additionally, for stock-based
awards issued prior to the effective date, compensation cost attributable to
future services will be recognized as the remaining service is rendered. The
Company elected to apply the modified prospective method of adoption of SFAS
No.123R.
SFAS 123(R) requires the use of a fair value based measurement
method when granting stock options.
The Company selected the
Black-Scholes method to measure the compensation cost for stock options. The
Black-Scholes method requires the use of significant assumptions to estimate
the fair value of the stock option awards. The expected term of the board of
director options is equivalent to the historical exercise experience for these
options. The expected term of the key employee options was the term of the
option as the individuals have exhibited a pattern of exercising options at or
near the expiration date. The expected volatility was calculated primarily with
reliance on historical volatility rates. The Company has no reason to believe
that future
volatility of the share price over the expected option term is likely to
differ from its past. The Company assumed a dividend yield equivalent to
historical dividend rates over the vesting period. The risk-free rate utilized
in the Black-Scholes calculations was the U.S. Constant Maturity Treasury
Security for the period equivalent to the term of the option.
The fair value of
options granted under the 1994 Stock Plan during 2007 and 2006 were estimated
on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the
following weighted average assumptions and results:
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
1.82
|
%
|
1.74
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
22
|
%
|
25
|
%
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
|
4.86
|
%
|
4.50
|
%
|
Expected term of
options in years
|
|
7.2
|
|
8.6
|
|
Fair value of
options on grant date
|
|
$
|
58,400
|
|
$
|
135,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For more
information on our stock-based compensation plans, see Note 5.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In 2006, the FASB issued
Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48), which clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a companys financial
statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes.
FIN 48
describes when an uncertain tax item should be recorded in the financial
statements and for how much, provides guidance on recording interest and
penalties and accounting and reporting for income taxes in interim periods.
FIN 48 was effective for the Companys year beginning January 1,
2007. Upon implementation, we determined our positions would be
more-likely-than-not sustained if challenged. Therefore, no cumulative effect
relating to the adoption of FIN 48 resulted. See Note 3 of notes to
consolidated financial statements for further discussion on income taxes.
In September 2006, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements,
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS No. 157
are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The
Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on
its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
In February 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115
. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose
to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates and report
unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been
elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS No. 159 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company
is evaluating the impact the adoption of SFAS No. 159 will have on its
consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
In December 2007, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 141(revised) Business Combinations. Statement No. 141(R) applies
to all business combinations. Under SFAS No. 141(R) an entity is
required to recognize the assets acquired,
38
liabilities assumed, contractual
contingencies, and contingent consideration at their fair values on the
acquisition date. We are required to adopt this statement starting in 2009 and
it is to be applied to business combinations occurring in 2009 and after. Early
adoption of this statement is prohibited. The Company is evaluating the impact
the adoption of SFAS No. 141 (R) will have on its consolidated
results of operations and financial condition.
In December 2007,
the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements. Statement No. 160 applies to the accounting for
noncontrolling interests and transactions with noncontrolling interest holders
in consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 160 changes the accounting
and reporting for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as
noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. We are
required to adopt this statement beginning in 2009. Early adoption of this
statement is prohibited.
2.
LAND, BUILDINGS AND
EQUIPMENT
Land, buildings
and equipment consists of the following at December 31:
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
6,673,076
|
|
$
|
6,673,076
|
|
Buildings and
building improvements
|
|
18,174,151
|
|
18,238,651
|
|
Furniture and
equipment
|
|
14,783,606
|
|
13,074,400
|
|
|
|
39,630,833
|
|
37,986,127
|
|
Accumulated
depreciation
|
|
(14,593,197
|
)
|
(13,082,181
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
25,037,636
|
|
$
|
24,903,946
|
|
3.
INCOME TAXES
A reconciliation
between income taxes computed at the statutory federal income tax rate and the
effective tax rate is as follows:
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal tax
expense computed at statutory rate
|
|
$
|
1,525,000
|
|
$
|
1,856,000
|
|
Nondeductible
lobbying expense
|
|
33,400
|
|
65,700
|
|
State expense,
net of federal impact
|
|
298,000
|
|
368,000
|
|
Other
|
|
8,301
|
|
43,999
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,864,701
|
|
$
|
2,333,699
|
|
Income tax expense for
the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 consists of the following:
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
1,585,500
|
|
$
|
1,930,600
|
|
State
|
|
464,401
|
|
567,100
|
|
|
|
2,049,901
|
|
2,497,700
|
|
Deferred,
primarily Federal
|
|
(185,200
|
)
|
(164,001
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
1,864,701
|
|
$
|
2,333,699
|
|
39
Current and long
term temporary differences and tax carryforwards at December 31 are as
follows:
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacation accrual
|
|
$
|
128,400
|
|
$
|
125,700
|
|
Player rewards
program accrual
|
|
126,400
|
|
83,200
|
|
Other
|
|
41,100
|
|
26,300
|
|
Net current
deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
295,900
|
|
$
|
235,200
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax depreciation
greater than book depreciation
|
|
$
|
(423,400
|
)
|
$
|
(483,700
|
)
|
Deferred gain on
sale of land
|
|
(104,000
|
)
|
(104,000
|
)
|
Stock options
|
|
162,600
|
|
79,400
|
|
Other
|
|
28,400
|
|
47,400
|
|
Net long-term
deferred tax liability
|
|
$
|
(336,400
|
)
|
$
|
(460,900
|
)
|
We
adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
,
on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in
income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance
with FASB Statement No. 109,
Accounting
for Income Taxes
. FIN 48 also prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement
of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Additionally,
FIN 48 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 was
effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN
48 had no effect on the amounts previously recognized for income taxes.
Interest and penalties associated with uncertain income tax positions
are presented in income tax expense. During the twelve months ended December 31,
2007, we have not recognized expense for interest and penalties, and, do not
have any amounts accrued at December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006
respectively, for the payment of interest and penalties.
The
Company is subject to U.S. and Minnesota taxation. The Companys tax years for
2004, 2005, and 2006 are subject to examination by the tax authorities. With
few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to US federal, state, local or
foreign examinations by tax authorities for years before 2004.
4.
STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
Stock
Options:
The Companys 1994
Stock Plan (the Plan) provides for the granting of awards in the form of
stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, and deferred stock
to key employees and non-employees, including directors of and consultants to
the Company and any subsidiary, to purchase up to a maximum of 1,450,000 shares
of common stock. Options that are granted under the Plan may be either options
that qualify as incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (Incentive Stock Options), or
those that do not qualify as Incentive Stock Options (Non-Qualified Stock
Options). The Plan is administered by the Board of Directors, or a committee
designated by the Board, which determines the persons who are to receive awards
under the Plan, the type of award to be granted, the number of shares subject
to each award and, if an option, the exercise price of each option. The Plan
also provides for formula grants of Non-Qualified Stock Options to non-employee
directors of the Company.
The Plan provides that payment of the exercise price may be made in the
form of unrestricted shares of common stock already owned by the optionee. The
Company calculates the fair market value of unrestricted shares as the average
of the high and low sales prices on the date of exercise.
40
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan:
On April 3,
1995, the Board of Directors adopted an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the ESPP). The ESPP is open to all employees of the
Company working more than 15 hours per week.
The ESPP consists of one-year phases.
The phases commence on October 1 of each year and under the terms
of the plan, employees are allowed to set aside a portion of their payroll
earnings to purchase shares of the Companys common stock. The purchase price is 95% of the fair market
value of the shares on the termination date of the phase. The plan provides for the sale of up to
350,000 shares. The plan issued 5,105
and 7,501 shares in 2007 and 2006, respectively. The ESPP has issued a total of 228,605 shares
since the inception of the ESPP.
401(k) Plan:
On June 1,
1998 the Company established a defined contribution savings plan for employees
who had completed one year of service, as defined in the Plan document. The defined contribution savings plan allows
for employee compensation deferral contributions under Section 401(k) of
the Internal Revenue Code and discretionary contributions by the Company. Employer contributions charged to operations
in 2007 and 2006 were approximately $292,000 and $376,000, respectively.
Employee
Stock Ownership Plan:
In December 2004,
the Companys Board of Directors approved an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the
ESOP) effective for calendar years beginning January 1, 2004. All eligible employees of the Company
participate in the ESOP after completing one full calendar year of
service. Contributions to the ESOP are
determined by the Board of Directors and can be made in cash or shares of the
Companys common stock. Annual
contributions are allocated to each participant based on compensation and vest
in accordance with a seven year graded vesting schedule. Compensation expense for the ESOP is
determined based on the average fair value of shares on the date the Company
commits to the contribution to the ESOP.
For the purposes of earnings per share, ESOP shares are included in
weighted-average common shares outstanding at year-end as the shares are
committed to be contributed on that date.
On February 12, 2008, the Company committed to contribute 10,000
shares of the Companys common stock valued at $109,000. The shares were issued in March 2008 and
will be allocated to the accounts of eligible employees based upon their 2007
compensation during the first quarter of 2008.
For calendar year 2006, the Company committed to contribute 10,000
shares of the Companys common stock valued at $132,000. The shares were issued in February 2007
and were allocated to the accounts of eligible employees based upon their 2006
compensation during the first quarter of 2007.
During 2006, the Company contributed an additional 46 shares valued at
$606 for calendar year 2005.
Stock
Repurchase Plan:
On November 2,
2006 the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a program
to repurchase up to 100,000 shares of the Companys common stock. On December 6, 2006 the Company
repurchased 53,050 shares of common stock at a price of $13.10 per share for a
total of $694,955. During 2007, the
Company repurchased the remaining 46,950 shares at an average price of $11.59
per share for a total of $544,110.
On January 16,
2008, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a
program to repurchase up to an additional 250,000 shares of the Companys
common stock. No repurchases under this
plan have been made as of the date of this filing.
5. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Plan, an
equity based compensation plan, provides for the granting of awards in the form
of stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, and deferred
stock to key employees and non-employees, including directors of and consultants
to the Company and any subsidiary, for up to a maximum of 1,450,000 shares of
common stock. During the first quarter
of 2007, the Company issued non-qualified options to the members of the Board
of Directors.
41
Stock option
activity related to the Plan during the years ended December 31, 2007 and
2006 is summarized below:
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
beginning of year
|
|
666,550
|
|
$
|
10.12
|
|
721,950
|
|
$
|
9.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
15,000
|
|
13.67
|
|
30,000
|
|
14.43
|
|
Exercised
|
|
(75,650
|
)
|
3.70
|
|
(85,400
|
)
|
5.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
end of year
|
|
605,900
|
|
$
|
11.00
|
|
666,550
|
|
$
|
10.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
exercisable at end of year
|
|
594,650
|
|
$
|
10.94
|
|
651,550
|
|
$
|
10.01
|
|
The grant-date
fair value of options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2007 is
$3,193,000 and $3,137,000, respectively.
The weighted average remaining contractual term of these options is 2.4
and 2.3 years, respectively. The Company
estimates no forfeitures related to these options.
The
weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the years 2007
and 2006 was $58,350 and $135,300, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options
exercised during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $182,000
and $204,000, respectively.
The following
table summarizes information concerning all options outstanding and options
exercisable as of December 31, 2007:
Range of Exercise Price
|
|
Options
Outstanding
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in Years
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Options
Exercisable
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
$
|
1.75 2.50
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
.1
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
28,000
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
2.50 5.00
|
|
|
75,400
|
|
1.1
|
|
4.07
|
|
75,400
|
|
4.07
|
|
|
|
5.00 7.50
|
|
|
167,500
|
|
2.6
|
|
6.17
|
|
167,500
|
|
6.17
|
|
|
|
7.50 17.25
|
|
|
335,000
|
|
2.9
|
|
15.69
|
|
323,750
|
|
15.73
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
605,900
|
|
2.4
|
|
$
|
11.00
|
|
594,650
|
|
$
|
10.94
|
|
2007
Grants
Each member of the
Board of Directors receives an annual recurring grant of 3,000 non-qualified
stock options. On February 1, 2007,
15,000 options were granted to the five board members with an exercise price
equal to the market price on the date of grant of $13.76. The stock options vest over a six-month
period and expire in ten years.
The compensation cost associated with the
Board of Director options is $58,400 to be recognized as expense over the
six-month vesting period. The
compensation cost associated with the employee stock option grant in 2006 is
being recognized ratably over the four-year vesting period.
In accordance with the modified prospective method,
the compensation cost related to these employee option awards included in
salaries and benefits expense for 2007 was $21,600. As of December 31, 2007, there was
$17,100 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options which
is expected to be recognized over 2.1 years.
The total income tax benefit recognized in the income statement for
stock-based compensation arrangements was $103,000 and $177,000 for 2007 and
2006, respectively.
42
A summary of the
status of the Companys restricted stock as of December 31, 2007, and
changes during the year then ended are presented below:
Restricted Stock
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at
beginning of year
|
|
41,000
|
|
$
|
14.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
0
|
|
0.00
|
|
Vested
|
|
0
|
|
0.00
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
(500
|
)
|
14.55
|
|
Unvested at end
of year
|
|
40,500
|
|
$
|
14.55
|
|
The compensation
cost associated with the restricted stock grant was calculated as the market
price on the date of grant of $14.55 for the 41,000 shares (reduced by
estimated forfeitures) of $589,275. In
accordance with the modified prospective method, the compensation cost related
to these awards included in salaries and benefits expense for the year ended December 31,
2007 and 2006 was $147,319 and $135,042, respectively. As of December 31, 2007, there was $306,914
of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock
compensation arrangements granted under the Plan which is expected to be
recognized over a period of 2.1 years.
6. EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATIONS
The following is a
reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the earnings per common
share computations:
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
(numerator) amounts used for basic and diluted per share computations:
|
|
$
|
2,620,740
|
|
$
|
3,125,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
shares (denominator) of common stock outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
4,062,866
|
|
4,000,505
|
|
Plus dilutive
effect of stock options
|
|
178,036
|
|
230,743
|
|
Diluted
|
|
4,240,902
|
|
4,231,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per
common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.65
|
|
$
|
.78
|
|
Diluted
|
|
.62
|
|
.74
|
|
Options to purchase
309,250 shares of common stock at an average of $16.01 per share were
outstanding at December 31, 2007 but were not included in the computation
of diluted EPS because the options exercise price was greater than the average
market price of the common shares. The
options expire in an average of 2.9 years.
Options to purchase
290,500 shares of common stock at an average of $16.15 per share were
outstanding at December 31, 2006 but were not included in the computation
of diluted EPS because the options exercise price was greater than the average
market price of the common shares.
7. LINES OF CREDIT
The Company has a
general credit and security agreement with Bremer Bank, N.A. Borrowings under the credit agreement include
a commercial revolving credit line, which provides for maximum advances of
$2,250,000 with interest at the prime rate until April 30, 2008. The Company had no borrowings under the
credit line during the year 2007. The
credit agreement contains covenants requiring the Company to maintain certain
financial ratios. The Company was in
compliance with these requirements as of December 31, 2007.
43
8. OPERATING LEASES AND COMMITMENTS
In January 2004
the Company entered into a five-year totalizator services agreement with
Scientific Games Inc. (formerly Autotote Systems, Inc.). Pursuant to the agreement, Scientific Games
provides totalizator equipment and computer programs which record and process
all wagers and calculate the odds and payoffs.
Amounts charged to operations under this agreement for the years ended December 31,
2007 and 2006 were approximately $315,000 and $342,000, respectively. During annual live race meets, Autotote
provides uplink services, which enables the Company to simulcast horse races
held at Canterbury Park to out-of-state racetracks. These services resulted in amounts charged to
operations in 2007 and 2006 of approximately $136,000 and $138,000,
respectively. Effective March 1, 2008,
the company renegotiated its totalizator services agreement with Scientific
Games and entered into a six-year agreement with Scientific Games, whereby the
performance of Scientific Games remains consistent with what is described
above.
The Company has
entered into operating leases for rental of office equipment and equipment to
print certain publications. Amounts
charged to operations under these agreements for the years ended December 31,
2007 and 2006 were approximately $94,000 and $96,000, respectively. All such leases expire on or before April 30,
2010. Future lease payment obligations
under these leases are provided in the contractual obligations table below.
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS TABLE
The following table reflects our
contractual obligations as of December 31, 2007:
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
Contractual Obligation (1)
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
Less than
1 year
|
|
1 3
years
|
|
3 5
years
|
|
More
than
5 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Lease
Obligations (2)
|
|
$
|
129,200
|
|
$
|
80,700
|
|
$
|
48,500
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Totalizator
lease obligations as discussed above are excluded from the table as the expense
is entirely dependent upon wagering levels.
(2) Includes operating lease obligations
for general office and printing equipment rental.
Since December 31,
2007, there have been no material changes outside the ordinary course of
business to our contractual obligations as set forth above. As of December 31, 2007, we had no
borrowings pursuant to our line of credit and were not party to capital lease
obligations, significant purchase obligations or other long-term obligations.
9. CONTINGENCIES
In connection with
the purchase of the Racetrack (Note 1), the Company entered into an Earn Out
Promissory Note dated March 29, 1994. In accordance with the Earn Out
Note, if (i) off-track betting becomes legally permissible in the State of
Minnesota and (ii) the Company begins to conduct off-track betting with
respect to or in connection with its operations, the Company will be required
to pay to the IMR Fund, L.P. the greater of $700,000 per operating year, as
defined, or 20% of the net pretax profit, as defined for each of five operating
years. At this time, management believes
that the likelihood that these two conditions will be met, and that the Company
will be required to pay these amounts is remote. At the date (if any) that these two
conditions are met, the five minimum payments will be discounted back to their
present value and the sum of those discounted payments will be capitalized as
part of the purchase price in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. The purchase price will be
further increased if payments become due under the 20% of Net Pretax Profit
calculation. The first payment is to be
made 90 days after the end of the third operating year in which off-track
betting is conducted by the Company.
Remaining payments would be made within 90 days of the end of each of
the next four operating years.
The Company is
periodically involved in various legal actions arising in the normal course of
business. At December 31, 2007,
management believes that the resolution of any legal actions outstanding will
not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
44
The Company
guarantees payment of statutory distributions under a $500,000 bond issued to
the Minnesota Racing Commission.
10. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company paid a
total of $50,100 in 2007 and $50,100 in 2006 to the Chair and Vice Chair of the
Company in consideration for the services they provided pursuant to consulting
agreements. In addition, another
non-employee Board member received $12,000 in 2007 and $0 in 2006 for services
regarding the Companys strategic planning matters.
11. OPERATING SEGMENTS
The Company has
three reportable operating segments:
horse racing, card club, and concessions. The horse racing segment includes simulcast
and live horse racing operations, the card club segment includes operations of
Canterbury Parks Card Club, and the concessions segment provides concessions
during simulcast and live racing, in the card club and during special
events. The Companys reportable
operating segments are strategic business units that offer different products
and services. They are managed separately
because the segments differ in the nature of the products and services
provided, as well as processes to produce those products and services. The horse racing and card club segments are
regulated by the Minnesota Racing Commission.
The accounting policies
of the operating segments are the same as those described in the summary of
significant accounting policies
Depreciation,
interest expense and income taxes are allocated to the segments but no
allocation is made to concessions for shared facilities. The concessions segment paid approximately
25% of gross revenues on live racing and special event days to the horse racing
segment for use of the facilities in 2007 and 2006.
The following tables
provide information about the Companys operating segments (in 000s):
|
|
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Horse Racing
|
|
Card Club
|
|
Concessions
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
from external customers
|
|
$
|
18,141
|
|
$
|
28,619
|
|
$
|
6,120
|
|
$
|
52,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment
revenues
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
2,047
|
|
2,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
income (expense)
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
1,259
|
|
596
|
|
144
|
|
1,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income
before income taxes
|
|
(381
|
)
|
4,850
|
|
1,485
|
|
5,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Assets
|
|
$
|
31,431
|
|
$
|
3,857
|
|
$
|
7,723
|
|
$
|
43,011
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Horse Racing
|
|
Card Club
|
|
Concessions
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
from external customers
|
|
$
|
19,556
|
|
$
|
30,168
|
|
$
|
6,116
|
|
$
|
55,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment
revenues
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
2,231
|
|
2,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
income (expense)
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
1,124
|
|
584
|
|
126
|
|
1,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income
before income taxes
|
|
(621
|
)
|
6,032
|
|
1,397
|
|
6,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Assets
|
|
$
|
29,867
|
|
$
|
3,676
|
|
$
|
6,258
|
|
$
|
39,801
|
|
45
Included in horse
racing segment revenues for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 is
approximately $253,000 and $271,000, respectively, for rental of the racing
facility for special events and storage.
The following are
reconciliations of reportable segment revenue, income before income taxes, and
assets, to the Companys consolidated totals (in 000s):
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues for
reportable segments
|
|
$
|
55,660
|
|
$
|
58,444
|
|
Elimination of
intersegment revenues
|
|
(2,780
|
)
|
(2,604
|
)
|
Total
consolidated net revenues
|
|
$
|
52,880
|
|
$
|
55,840
|
|
Income before
income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment
income before income taxes
|
|
$
|
5,954
|
|
$
|
6,808
|
|
Elimination of
intersegment income before income taxes
|
|
(1,469
|
)
|
(1,349
|
)
|
Total
consolidated income before income taxes
|
|
$
|
4,485
|
|
$
|
5,459
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2007
|
|
December 31,
2006
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset for
reportable segments
|
|
$
|
43,011
|
|
$
|
39,801
|
|
Elimination of
intercompany receivables
|
|
(6,905
|
)
|
(5,450
|
)
|
Total
consolidated assets
|
|
$
|
36,106
|
|
$
|
34,351
|
|
12.
SUPPLEMENTARY
FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
|
|
2007 Quarter Ended:
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
June 30
|
|
September 30
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
11,468,589
|
|
$
|
14,626,023
|
|
$
|
15,522,631
|
|
$
|
11,262,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
10,017,588
|
|
13,823,606
|
|
14,633,716
|
|
10,248,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
892,377
|
|
502,993
|
|
589,992
|
|
635,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings
per share
|
|
.22
|
|
.12
|
|
.14
|
|
.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings
per share
|
|
.21
|
|
.12
|
|
.14
|
|
.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Quarter Ended:
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
June 30
|
|
September 30
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
12,096,377
|
|
$
|
14,845,784
|
|
$
|
16,313,694
|
|
$
|
12,583,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
10,110,314
|
|
14,308,164
|
|
15,492,843
|
|
10,748,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
1,162,647
|
|
345,358
|
|
524,433
|
|
1,092,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings
per share
|
|
.29
|
|
.08
|
|
.13
|
|
.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings
per share
|
|
.26
|
|
.08
|
|
.12
|
|
.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
Item 9. CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
Not Applicable.
Item
9A(T). CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls
and Procedures:
The Companys Chief Executive Officer,
Randall D. Sampson, and Chief Financial Officer, David C. Hansen, have reviewed
the Companys disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b) as
of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon this review, these officers have
concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective
to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the
Company files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the
SEC and that the disclosure controls are also effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the Companys Exchange Act reports is
accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive
officer and chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
(b)
Managements
annual report on internal control over financial reporting:
The Companys internal control report is
included in this report after Item 8, under the caption Managements
Report on Companys Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
(c)
Changes in Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting:
There has been no change in our internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that occurred during our fiscal quarter ended December 31,
2007, that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item
9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Not Applicable.
PART III
Item 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information Incorporated by Reference
.
Information required under Item 402 of Regulation S-K
to the extent applicable with respect to the directors will be set forth in a
section captioned Election of Directors in the Companys Proxy Statement for
the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 5, 2008 (the 2008
Proxy Statement), a definitive copy of which will be filed with the Commission
within 120 days of the close of the 2007 fiscal year, which information is
incorporated herein by reference.
Information required under Item 402 of Regulation S-K regarding
executive officers is presented under Item 1(c)(x) herein. Information required under Item 405 regarding
Exchange Act Section 16a compliance to the extent required will be set
forth in a section titled Section 16a Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
in the 2008 Proxy statement.
Code of Ethics
The Company has adopted a code of ethics applicable to
all employees of and consultants to the Company. A copy of the Code of Conduct can be obtained
free of charge upon written request directed to the Companys Secretary at the
executive offices of the Company.
47
Item 11. EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Information
required under Item 402 of Regulation S-K will be set forth in a section
entitled Executive Compensation and Other Information in the Companys 2008
Proxy Statement which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information
required under Item 403 of Regulation S-K will be set forth in a section
entitled Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Election of
Directors in the Companys 2008 Proxy Statement which information is
incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS, RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Information, if any, required by Item 404 of
Regulation S-K will be set forth in a section entitled Certain Transactions
in the Companys 2008 Proxy Statement which information is incorporated herein
by reference.
Item 14. PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Information required by Item 14 of this Form 10-K
and Item 9(e) of Schedule 14A will be set forth in a section entitled The
Companys Auditors in the Companys 2008 Proxy statement which information is
incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
Item
15.
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a).
|
|
The following Consolidated Financial
Statements of Canterbury Park Holding Corporation and subsidiaries are
included in Part II, Item 8 pages 30-46:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Report on Companys
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements Of Operations
for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in
Stockholders Equity for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial
statements
|
|
|
|
(b).
|
|
The exhibits listed on the Exhibits
Index on pages 50 & 51 are filed with this Form 10-K or
incorporated by reference in this report.
|
|
|
|
(c).
|
|
No financial statement schedules are
required by Item 8 and Item 15(c) of Form 10-K.
|
48
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the
requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: March 31,
2008
|
CANTERBURY PARK HOLDING
CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
/s/ Randall D.
Sampson
|
|
|
Randall D.
Sampson
|
|
|
President and
Chief Executive Officer
|
Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the following persons on
behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and the dates indicated have
signed this report below.
Power of Attorney
Each person whose
signature appears below constitutes and appoints CURTIS A. SAMPSON, DALE H.
SCHENIAN and RANDALL D. SAMPSON as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and
agents, each acting alone, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign
any of all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the
same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith,
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in
and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all said attorneys-in-fact
and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Curtis A. Sampson
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
Curtis A. Sampson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Dale H. Schenian
|
|
Director; Vice Chairman
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
Dale H. Schenian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Randall D. Sampson
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President,
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
Randall D. Sampson
|
|
General Manager, Treasurer and
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David C. Hansen
|
|
Chief Financial Officer*
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
David C. Hansen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Patrick R. Cruzen
|
|
Director
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
Patrick R. Cruzen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Carin J. Offerman
|
|
Director
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
Carin J. Offerman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Burton F. Dahlberg
|
|
Director
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
Burton F. Dahlberg
|
|
|
|
|
* Principal
Accounting Officer
49
CANTERBURY PARK HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
Exhibit Index To
Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31,
2007
Regulation
S-B
Exhibit Table
Reference
|
|
Title of Document
|
|
Location in Consecutive Numbering
System as Filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of
Incorporation, as amended.
|
|
Filed as Exhibit 3.1
to the Forms SB-2 Registration Statement of the Company, File
No. 33-81262C, (the SB-2 Registration Statement) and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws, as amended
|
|
Filed as
Exhibit 3.2 to the SB-2 Registration Statement and incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Plan of Reorganization
dated as of May 20, 1994 between Canterbury Park Holding Corporation and
Canterbury Park Concessions, Inc.
|
|
Filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the SB-2 Registration Statement and incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Restated Stock Purchase
Agreement
|
|
Filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to the SB-2 Registration Statement and incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Letter dated
April 4, 1994 from the Minnesota Horsemens Benevolent and Protective Association, Inc.
to Minnesota Racing Commission waiving 125 day racing minimum
|
|
Filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to the SB-2 Registration Statement and incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Stock Option Plan, as
amended*
|
|
Filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of the
Company filed on August 28, 1997 (File No. 333-34509) and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Form of
Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement
|
|
Filed as
Exhibit 10.6 to the SB-2 Registration Statement and incorporated herein
by reference.
|
* Denotes an exhibit that covers management
contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements.
50
Regulation S-B
Exhibit Table
Reference
|
|
Title of Document
|
|
Location in Consecutive Numbering
System as Filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Curtis A. Sampson Guaranty to HRA
|
|
Filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the SB-2 Registration
Statement and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
General Credit and Security Agreement dated as of
June 3, 1998 between Canterbury Park Holding Corporation and Bremer Bank
N.A. (previously First American Bank, N.A.) This exhibit 10.10 replaces
exhibit 10.10 filed previously as an exhibit to the SB-2 Registration
Statement.
|
|
Filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Stock Purchase Savings Plan
|
|
Filed as Exhibit 10.11 to Form 10-KSB for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Consultants and
Advisors
|
|
Filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of the Company filed on August 28, 1997 (File
No. 333-34509) and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Power of Attorney
|
|
Included in signature page at page 49.
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 0f 2002
|
|
Filed herewith
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Filed herewith
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
The exhibits
referred to in this Exhibit will be supplied to a shareholder at a charge
of $.25 per page upon written request directed to Canterbury Park Holding
Corporation at the executive offices of the Company.
51
Grafico Azioni Canterbury Park Hl (AMEX:ECP)
Storico
Da Apr 2024 a Mag 2024
Grafico Azioni Canterbury Park Hl (AMEX:ECP)
Storico
Da Mag 2023 a Mag 2024