Serica Energy
plc
("Serica" or the
"Company")
Operations and Financial
Update
London, 27 June 2024 - Serica Energy plc (AIM:
SQZ), a British independent upstream oil and gas company with
operations in the UK North Sea, provides the following operations
and financial update.
Guidance
Production guidance is unchanged at
41,000 boe/d to 46,000 boe/d.
Operating costs for the year to date
are consistent with the target of US$20 per boe.
Production
Average net production for the year
to date[1] is 43,781 boe/d. The average
monthly breakdown by area is as follows (all numbers in
boe/d):
|
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
June[2]
|
Total
|
Bruce Hub
|
22,670
|
23,958
|
21,458
|
23,382
|
23,555
|
25,771
|
23,355
|
Triton Hub
|
12,726
|
18,364
|
17,470
|
17,076
|
3,691
|
17,520
|
14,276
|
Other Assets
|
7,259
|
6,174
|
5,454
|
5,656
|
6,743
|
5,408
|
6,150
|
Total
|
42,655
|
48,496
|
44,382
|
46,114
|
33,989
|
48,699
|
43,781
|
Bruce Hub production has been steady
year to date. The uptick in June reflects the impact of the recent
Light Well Intervention Vessel ("LWIV") campaign on Bruce. More
production history is required to estimate the 'steady' state
levels of production from the worked over wells.
The well intervention to reinstate
production from the Keith field has also been successfully
completed. Production from the K1 well restarted on 8 June but has
been intermittent to date while topsides operations are
optimised.
This summer's programme of Bruce
field platform well interventions is on track to commence in
mid-July. The programme has a planned duration of ninety days and
includes a range of activities designed to enhance production and
routine monitoring.
A brief routine outage of the
Forties Pipeline System is scheduled in July. We plan to take
advantage of this to carry out some maintenance work on Bruce. The
Bruce Hub is scheduled to be shut-in for seven days to carry out
these activities.
At our Triton Hub, the Triton FPSO
is currently operating with a single gas export compressor with
repairs to restore two-compressor operations due in October. A trip
on the available compressor during May led to no production via the
Triton FPSO for three weeks. Full production has been
re-established but this operating vulnerability will remain until
the second compressor is repaired. The planned 2024 summer shutdown
of the Triton FPSO remains at forty days commencing on 1
July.
In our Other Assets, we are seeing
generally good performance in line with or above our targets. The
exception is Erskine which was shut-in on 26 January 2024 due to a
problem with a compressor on the host Lomond platform. Although
production was re-established in early May, it has since been taken
offline for the planned Lomond turnaround. Erskine production is
scheduled to restart in late July.
Triton Area drilling
The reservoir section of the B1z
sidetrack (re-named as the "B6" well) on the Bittern field has been
drilled successfully. Initial well logging has given
good indications of high quality, oil filled
reservoir, consistent with pre-drill expectations.
The forward plan is to complete the well and to
commence testing in August 2024 after the planned Triton summer
shutdown.
Following completion of the B6 well,
the COSL Innovator rig will move to the Gannet E field in order to
drill the GE-05 well. Production from this well is expected to
start in November 2024.
Financial
At 26 June 2024 the Company held
cash and cash equivalents of £301.6 million and debt drawings of
US$231.0 million (£182.0 million) respectively. This is after 2023
final tax payments of £58.3 million, capital spending of £80.0
million, asset acquisition costs of £17.3 million (including
completion of the Greater Buchan Area transaction and 'BKR'
transaction related payments) and the share buyback of £15.0
million.
Following the sanction of the
Belinda development, estimated cash spend on capital items during
2024 as a whole is currently estimated at about £200 million
pre-tax. It should also be noted that the schedules for tax payment
in respect of 2024 and dividends mean these cash items fall
disproportionately into the second half of the year.
AGM
presentation
At the Annual General Meeting
("AGM") today, presentations will be made by the Chairman and
Interim CEO, David Latin, and the CFO, Martin Copeland. Copies of
the presentations will be available on the Company website
www.serica-energy.com under Investors/Presentations.
The full text of the Chairman's
Statement to be delivered at the AGM by David Latin, Chairman and
Interim CEO, is below. It includes the following:
"Over just a few years Serica has been transformed from a
small international exploration focussed company into one of the
top 10 producers in the UK North Sea, safely and responsibly
operating complex facilities offshore and growing its 2P reserves
some 35 times since the beginning of 2015. To deliver these
achievements we have navigated operational challenges, oil and gas
prices hitting historic lows - remember gas prices of 10 pence a
therm in May 2020 - and pulled off multiple good
acquisitions. With the assets, financial strength, staff and
leadership now in place, we have a very solid platform for entering
the next phase of growth."
"We are rightly proud of our track record of growth and value
creation, and we aim to repeat the same in the future.
Unfortunately, recent and potential future increases in UK oil and
gas taxes make that increasingly difficult. Consequently, while we
remain watchful for opportunities in the UK that might be
attractive despite this increasingly challenging context, we are
also looking very actively overseas."
Chairman's 2024 AGM Statement
I am very honoured to be addressing
you as the Chairman of Serica Energy for the first time at an
Annual General Meeting. Following in the footsteps of the
inspirational Tony Craven Walker, I look forward to maintaining and
building on the standards that he set.
Serica is a UK success story. It has
been built largely through the acquisition of unloved assets from
the 'Majors'. Through diligent attention, investment and the
application of a good dose of skill, we have supplied much needed
energy, created substantial value, paid significant amounts of tax,
created jobs and reduced emissions. We are proud of that track
record and confident of our ability to repeat those successes where
government policies and regulations make that possible - more about
which I will cover later.
It has been an eventful twelve
months for Serica. Clearly, there has been significant change in
the leadership of the Company since our last AGM. One year ago, the
baton of chairman was passed from Tony to me, and then we
announced, firstly, that Andy Bell and, then later, Mitch Flegg
would be standing down as CFO and CEO respectively. Their
contributions to the remarkable successes of Serica over the last
several years are immense. I thank both. Andy was succeeded
as CFO by Martin Copeland, who will speak later about the 2023
financial results, and we look forward to Chris Cox starting as CEO
on the 1st of July.
In the last year the Company has
prepared for and initiated an ambitious investment programme of
well interventions and drilling. I am pleased to report that so far
execution has gone well; a testament to the capabilities of our
Operations and Technical teams. Less welcome were the unexpected
challenges encountered during the maintenance shutdowns on both our
main producing hubs last summer. By necessity, these were longer
than planned which materially impacted production.
I am particularly pleased that we
completed the acquisition of Tailwind in March last year. The
benefit of a substantially increased level of production, now
balanced between oil and gas, is clear given the changes in oil and
gas prices since we concluded the transaction. Average realised gas
prices fell 42% from 2022 to 2023 and, while realised oil prices
also fell, the reduction was less at 27%; a relative trend which
has continued in 2024. On a pro-forma basis, in 2023 we achieved a
reserves replacement ratio of over 170% with 2P year-end reserves
increased from 130 to 140 million barrels of oil equivalent despite
producing 14 million barrels of oil equivalent. Our enlarged
reserves base supports a new debt facility which increases our
financial resilience and our ability to take advantage of
attractive M&A options. Finally, despite markedly reduced sales
prices last year compared with 2022, we had sufficient post tax
cash flow and reserves to mean that today we are seeking
shareholder consent to propose a final dividend of 14p per share,
giving a total dividend in respect of 2023 of 23p per
share.
Since 2018 to the end of 2023, on a
proforma basis, Serica has produced over 50 million barrels oil
equivalent and has kept investing through the commodity price
cycle. According to independent reserves reports, Bruce/Keith/Rhum
2P reserves were higher at the end of last year than they were when
Serica bought the assets. According to those same reports, both the
Bruce and Triton hubs are now projected to be producing into the
mid-2030s, representing nearly an added decade of production
compared to expectations when the assets were acquired.
Moreover, at the same time as adding
oil and gas reserves, we have reduced the carbon emissions
associated with the facilities we operate and are developing plans
to reduce them further.
We are a publicly owned company
unashamedly seeking to create value for our shareholders. While
doing so we also deliver for a wide range of other
stakeholders. Serica has created high-quality well-paid jobs
in the UK, paid taxes of approximately £500 million to the UK
Government since 2020 and contributed - as the producer of about 5%
of the UK's gas production - to the energy security of the UK at a
time of heightened tensions in Europe.
We are rightly proud of our track
record of growth and value creation, and we aim to repeat the same
in the future. Unfortunately, recent and potential future increases
in UK oil and gas taxes make that increasingly difficult.
Consequently, while we remain watchful for opportunities in the UK
that might be attractive despite this increasingly challenging
context, we are also looking very actively overseas. You will of
course appreciate that I will not be able to comment on specific
opportunities.
Inevitably, I have to say more about
the macro issues facing UK North Sea producers today.
I have been involved in this
industry for more than 30 years and have worked all over the world.
Other than when I was responsible for a company which had
significant assets in a war zone, I have never encountered a
situation which was so challenging when it comes to making
investment decisions, and planning for the future more generally,
as it is in the UK at present.
Reliable, sustainable, and
affordable energy is the lifeblood of our modern society.
Notwithstanding the critical importance of the energy transition,
which Serica wholeheartedly supports, the fact is that oil and gas
accounts for 74% of UK primary energy consumption today and will
remain a vital and significant contributor to the power,
transportation and goods on which each person in the UK relies
every day and will do for decades to come, even in the most
ambitious Net Zero Scenarios.
The UK consumes almost twice as much
oil and gas as it produces. This deficit will persist even as the
country seeks to reduce its consumption of hydrocarbons.
Consequently, every barrel of oil and molecule of gas used but not
produced in the UK is imported. Without continued investment in our
homegrown oil and gas sector, the gap between UK production and
consumption will only widen, to be filled inevitably by imports.
These imports worsen our national balance of payments, only deliver
jobs and taxes to foreign countries and, typically, have higher
production and transportation carbon emissions by the time they get
to our shores.
We hear much reference in the UK
political debate to terms such as "proper windfall tax", "oil and
gas giants" and "closing loopholes". These phrases reflect
fundamental misconceptions.
UK oil and gas producers already pay
tax at an overall rate of 75%, three times the tax rate for UK
companies operating in other sectors. This is despite the period of
so-called "windfall" conditions for UK producers having long
passed, with oil and gas prices having returned to historically
normal levels. Yet in the current General Election, no reduction to
match the circumstances is proposed by the Conservative Party and
yet another increase in the tax rate to 78% is proposed by the
Labour Party.
As to the claim that the tax is
being paid by the "oil and gas giants", it is in fact independent
companies like Serica who are most affected. The 'Majors' account
for only around a third of UK production and the vast majority of
their profits are made overseas and are not touched by increasing
tax rates on UK production. Indeed, for those companies such as
Serica that continued to invest in their assets during periods of
lower commodity prices prior to the invasion of Ukraine, the
current fiscal regime represents a further punishment for risk
capital committed to its portfolio during the very low commodity
prices seen in the Covid period.
Closing "loopholes" in UK oil and
gas tax seems to mean different things to different people.
Whatever is meant, I wish to be crystal clear that reducing tax
relief for capital expenditure below the rate at which tax is
payable would make investment in the vast majority of UK North Sea
projects unprofitable, meaning that these projects, and the jobs
and tax revenues they would generate, simply will not
happen.
Oil and gas continue to flow only
when the mains supply of investment stays open. Without it, the
flow dries up. Even existing oil and gas fields decline and need
continuous investment to maintain production. Without investment
fields will start to shut-in and there will be a domino effect in
the interconnected and interdependent UK North Sea infrastructure.
Significantly reducing tax relief for capital expenditure will
rapidly and terminally accelerate the decline in UK oil and gas
production. The trajectory of UK production will not be a smooth
glide path. Oil and gas consumption in the UK will be reduced not
one iota, but UK jobs will be lost, imports increased, overall
emissions raised, tax receipts for the Exchequer actually reduced,
and the country's security weakened.
What I describe are not just the
arguments of oil and gas companies. They have support across the
political spectrum including the trade union movement.
On top of the fiscal uncertainties,
we also have the implications of the Supreme Court decision last
week requiring planning authorities to take account of downstream
emissions in the approvals process for oil and gas fields. We do
not take issue with consideration of the environmental impact of
planning decisions. Again, however, the choice is not between UK
oil and gas or no oil and gas; the choice is UK oil and gas or
foreign oil and gas. As was stated in the Supreme Court decision,
emissions respect no borders. The oil and gas we do not produce, we
still import and consume. Global emissions will be no less because
the oil or gas is not produced in the UK.
I hold that hydrocarbons are not
intrinsically evil. They have allowed our civilisation to escape
the bounds of subsistence. Welcome alternatives are being developed
but we - not least in the UK - will continue to depend on
hydrocarbons for decades to come and surely it is better to produce
these responsibly under world leading regulatory oversight in this
country, with all the attendant benefits in jobs and tax revenues,
than to import hydrocarbons which often arrive with a higher
environmental and social cost than domestic production.
So, I ask the next UK Government to
pursue policies which recognise the long-term importance and value
of homegrown oil and gas production as a source of essential
energy, jobs and government revenues. Specifically, this requires,
firstly, a tax system which is predictable, stable and equitable in
terms of sharing profits between private capital and the public
Exchequer. Secondly, we need a coherent regulatory system that
properly reflects that climate change is a global issue and not a
parochial one.
And yet, notwithstanding all the
headwinds we face in the UK, I am optimistic for Serica's
future.
Over just a few years Serica has
been transformed from a small international exploration focussed
company into one of the top 10 producers in the UK North Sea,
safely and responsibly operating complex facilities offshore and
growing its 2P reserves some 35 times since the beginning of 2015.
To deliver these achievements we have navigated operational
challenges, oil and gas prices hitting historic lows - remember gas
prices of 10 pence a therm in May 2020 - and pulled off multiple
good acquisitions. With the assets, financial strength, staff
and leadership now in place, we have a very solid platform for
entering the next phase of growth.
I hope that the circumstances will
allow us to keep investing in our existing portfolio for many years
to come. If necessary, however, we will adjust our strategy to
protect shareholder value. In any event, be assured that we will
continue to be diligent in delivering the most we can from our
existing assets and to search out new value accretive
opportunities, whether they be in the UK or overseas.
Enquiries:
Serica Energy plc
|
+44
(0)20 7390 0230
|
David Latin (Chairman and Interim
CEO) / Martin Copeland (CFO) / Stephen Lambert (VP Legal and
External Relations)
|
|
|
|
Peel Hunt (Nomad & Joint Broker)
|
+44
(0)20 7418 8900
|
Richard Crichton / David McKeown /
Georgia Langoulant
|
|
|
|
Jefferies (Joint Broker)
|
+44
(0)20 7029 8000
|
Sam Barnett / Will Soutar
|
|
|
|
Vigo Consulting (PR Advisor)
|
+44
(0)20 7390 0230
|
Patrick d'Ancona / Finlay
Thomson
|
serica@vigoconsulting.com
|
NOTES TO EDITORS
Serica Energy is a British
independent oil and gas exploration and production company with a
portfolio of UKCS assets.
Serica has a balance of gas and oil
production. The Company is responsible for about 5% of the natural
gas produced in the UK, a key element in the UK's energy
transition.
Serica's producing assets are
focused around two main hubs: the Bruce, Keith and Rhum fields in
the UK Northern North Sea, which it operates, and a mix of operated
and non-operated fields tied back to the Triton FPSO. Serica also
has operated interests in the producing Columbus (UK Central North
Sea) and Orlando (UK Northern North Sea) fields and a non-operated
interest in the producing Erskine field in the UK Central North
Sea.
Serica has a two-pronged strategy
for growth comprising investment in its existing portfolio and
M&A.
Further information on the Company
can be found at www.serica-energy.com.
The Company's shares are traded on the AIM market of the London
Stock Exchange under the ticker SQZ and the Company is a designated
foreign issuer on the TSX. To receive Company news releases via
email, please subscribe via the Company website.