CHAIR'S STATEMENT
Dear
Shareholder,
I am pleased to report another resilient year for the
Company. Occupancy on our portfolio of grocery stores was 100%, as
was rent collection, and indeed annualised passing rent grew year
on year by 12%, due to accretive acquisitions and inflation
protection in over 80% of our leases. Our vigilance on our cost
base was again notable and we have one of the lowest EPRA cost
ratios of our peers. We expect our cost ratio to reduce over the
next 12 months as we focus on further operational efficiencies
across the business. Once again, we are benefitting from our
interest rate hedging strategy and we expect the interest rate
backdrop to be more supportive from this point in the cycle.
All of this is permitting us to recommend a further,
if modest, increase to our dividend for the coming year to 6.12
pence per share (2024: 6.06 pence per share). This is in the
context of our stated aim to deliver sustainable, long-term,
growing income from the grocery real estate industry. The last
three years have seen some challenging macroeconomic headwinds but
we have weathered the storm and increased the dividend every year.
We believe we have now seen the worst of it. Our job is to maximise
our earnings and continue to increase the dividend on a covered
basis, and benefit from the inherent affordability of the rents our
grocery tenants pay us.
The background to the challenging nature of the last
three years has been the fact that we have all had to get used to
operating in a higher interest rate environment compared to that in
the 2010s. Those higher interest rates seem to have peaked during
the summer of 2023, with 5-year swap rates exceeding 5% in July
2023. At that time, the Company prudently paid down debt to run at
a lower LTV of 33%. This strategically conservative approach to
leverage has, however, meant that 2024 earnings growth has been
modest. On the other hand, we believe that property valuations
reached a floor in December 2023. Consequently, we have been
confident in 2024 to increase leverage, including through our
oversubscribed debut Private Placement debt issuance, to help drive
earnings growth through acquisitions which will benefit future
years.
In growing through acquisitions, the Investment
Adviser's position as a sector specialist gives the Company unique
access to off-market opportunities to acquire these assets at
yields which are above the cost of our debt financing. We have been
highly selective in our acquisitions and maintain our focus of
investing in top trading omnichannel stores let to the strongest
grocery operators.
While continuing to pursue our core UK strategy, we
have also sought to broaden our investible universe and enhance the
diversity and covenant strength of our tenant base through a highly
selective expansion into Europe.
In April, we made our first investment into the €290
billion French grocery sector with an off-market, direct sale and
leaseback of 17 omnichannel stores with Carrefour. The transaction
was the culmination of over 12 months of discussions, leveraging
the Investment Adviser's deep grocery expertise and long-standing
sector relationships. This was Carrefour's first sale and leaseback
in France in 12 years and underlines the Company's credentials as a
trusted and expert counterparty.
The transaction highlights the attractive
opportunities to acquire and finance omnichannel supermarkets let
to high-quality covenants with highly affordable rents in Europe.
The acquisition was made at a 6.3% net initial yield and financed
at an accretive 4.4% fixed cost of funding in Euros. However, this
was a tentative exploration into non-UK property assets,
representing some 4% of the portfolio.
We continue to see interesting opportunities such as
this and if we decide to increase further our exposure to
continental European grocery assets, we will first consult with
shareholders and seek shareholder approval to revise our Investment
Policy accordingly.
Our thesis at IPO in 2017 was focussed on the mission
critical nature of omnichannel stores as last mile fulfilment hubs
and the long-term attractiveness of owning these
infrastructure-like assets. This thesis is as valid as ever in 2024
in both the UK and France.
The strong performance of the UK and French grocery
sectors and our omnichannel stores within them means our stores
benefit from higher sales densities. This ensures rents remain
affordable for our tenants. Rent to Turnover ("RTO") at store level
is the key affordability measure in the sector. The Company's UK
portfolio is at an average 4% RTO which is in-line with the
long-standing industry standard level for high-quality stores.
The discount to EPRA NTA at which the Company's shares
have traded through the year is a frustration for the Board and
closing this discount is a key focus for the Company. We
continually review how best to allocate our shareholders' capital.
The Board believes that over the medium term, earnings growth and
the sustainability of the dividend will serve to narrow the
discount. We are also focused on capital recycling opportunities
through the sale of individual stores or larger JV
opportunities.
We regularly assess the use of share buybacks and at a
certain price and in sufficient quantity they make mathematical
sense if one can achieve both at the same time. However, the Board
has given the Investment Adviser a mandate to achieve growth, on
the basis that growing earnings through a selective approach to
acquisitions will generate a higher return than that offered by
share buybacks over the medium to long term. This position has
remained under continuous review over the past year and will
continue to be debated while our shares trade at a discount to EPRA
NTA.
I am particularly pleased this year with the progress
being made on the Company's sustainability activities. A key
milestone has been achieved with the validation and approval of the
Company's science-based targets by the Science Based Target
initiative ("SBTi"). We have also seen the continued addition of EV
charging and solar panels at a number of our stores. Our tenants
have also made ambitious net zero commitments and a benefit of
owning mission critical real estate is the continuing capital
expenditure our tenants make into our stores to meet their own
commitments particularly in the area of refrigeration. Our Task
Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures ("TCFD") compliant
annual report is accompanied by our second standalone
sustainability report published today. The Company has prepared
EPRA Sustainability Best Practices Recommendations ("sBPR")
disclosures for the first time and is also currently preparing its
first net zero transition plan.
In the coming months we also expect to proceed with a
secondary listing on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange ("JSE"). Based
on positive investor feedback following a non-deal roadshow
undertaken in February 2024, we believe that the secondary listing
will help improve trading liquidity and the diversity of our
shareholder base. Such listings require minimal additional
reporting and have relatively low ongoing costs to maintain. I look
forward to welcoming South African investors to the shareholder
register and in time we hope that these investors will grow to
represent a strong and supportive addition to the Company's
register.
As part of Board's succession planning, we appointed
Sapna Shah as head of the Nominations Committee and as Senior
Independent Director ("SID"). She, along with the other members of
the Nominations Committee, will be determining the process for
identifying and recruiting three new NEDs over the coming two years
including a new Audit Chair and a new Chair. We thank Vince Prior
for his service as Chair of the Nominations Committee and SID.
Outlook
In the context of the recently challenging macro
headwinds, we can now begin to consider the possibility of a more
favourable interest rate environment. Market expectations of modest
interest rate cuts over the coming months, albeit not returning to
the levels of the 2010s, provide confidence that we have now seen
the floor in this current cycle. We have a balance sheet and asset
portfolio which will enable us to deliver sustainable, long-term,
earnings growth even at these new 'normal' interest rate levels. I
am hopeful that as the equity markets re-focus on the
attractiveness of real estate, the quality of our assets and the
secure nature of our growing income stream will once again be
recognised.
In the meantime, due to our sector specialism, we
continue to be able to selectively add attractive assets to our
portfolio to grow earnings and ultimately dividend. Due to the
prudent steps taken to run lower leverage throughout 2023, the
Company has had the balance sheet capacity during 2024 to take
advantage as these opportunities arise. Earnings will also be
enhanced through our programme of even stricter cost control
delivering a low EPRA cost ratio of 14.7% which we expect to reduce
further over the next 12 months, in search of our goal to be the
company with the lowest EPRA cost ratio of our externally managed
peers.
Nick
Hewson
Chair
17 September 2024
A conversation with Justin
King about the future of the UK grocery sector
Justin King is a senior adviser to Atrato Capital, the
Group's Investment Adviser. Justin is recognised as one of the UK's
most successful grocery sector leaders, having served as CEO of
Sainsbury's for over a decade and previously held senior roles at
Marks & Spencer, Asda, PepsiCo and Mars.
He is currently Non-Executive Director of Marks &
Spencer and Chairman of Allwyn Entertainment which operates the
National Lottery licence, Ovo Energy and Dexters, London's leading
estate agent. Justin also advises a series of high-profile
consumer-focused companies including Itsu Grocery and Snappy
Shopper. Justin is an advocate for responsible business, has been
instrumental in launching several charitable concerns including the
charity Made by Sport, which championed the power of sport to
change young lives. Justin brings an unrivalled wealth of grocery
sector experience and a deep understanding of grocery property
strategy.
Question 1: The
Carrefour sale and leaseback provided a unique entry point into the
French grocery market. Do you consider this this market to be very
different to the UK market?
It's less different than many think! It's a
significant €290 billion market12, with supermarkets
being the most dominant channel and the four top grocers holding
over 70% of the market. Just like the UK, this operator
concentration has been achieved through very well-located shops,
great customer service, well-developed supply chains and an
increasing focus on omnichannel business models.
Carrefour is one of the largest grocers in the world,
has a 19.6%13 share of the French grocery market and
provides an excellent addition to SUPR's portfolio, further
diversifying its tenant mix. So, taken all together, the
transaction capitalises on the opportunity to leverage the
Company's grocery specialism in generating attractive investment
prospects whilst also being highly complementary to the existing
portfolio and strategy.
Of course, entering any new market comes with risk. I
believe an essential component to managing that risk is through
developing strong partnerships with leading operators. It is
noteworthy that Atrato has entered this market via a direct sale
and leaseback with Carrefour, benefiting from the insights derived
from this relationship-based model which has always been a core
part of the Company's strategy.
Question 2: You
mention the benefits of leveraging sector specialism. How important
do you think Atrato's deep knowledge of the omnichannel model will
be when considering investing in grocery property markets like
France?
Firstly, it's important to remember that the UK's
grocers were early pioneers in online grocery, resulting in one of
the highest penetration rates for online grocery sales globally.
This success was driven by an early transition to multi-channel
stores which have been able to provide seamless integration between
online and offline channels. I think it's fair to say that
operators across the world have long looked at the UK as a template
and we are seeing a global convergence to the omnichannel
model.
SUPR is the largest landlord of omnichannel grocery
stores in the UK. That makes the Company an attractive property
partner for grocers looking to capitalise on the online opportunity
thorough transitioning toward omnichannel trading strategies. It
also provides a valuable pathway to source attractive future
investment opportunities.
Carrefour's objective of growing its omnichannel
customer base to 30% and online sales to €10 billion annually by
202614 is a clear recognition of the additional value to
be captured through leveraging its supermarket estate and I know
this was a key consideration in Carrefour selecting SUPR as its
partner in the sale and leaseback transaction.
Question 3: How
should the market think about affordability of rent on grocery
property and how that impacts market rents in
particular?
For grocery operators, a key metric for determining
the affordability of rent is the ratio of rent to store turnover,
with c.4% being the long-standing industry benchmark in the UK.
This equates to roughly two weeks of store sales and is considered
affordable by operators, comparing favourably to other asset
classes such as retail parks at c.12%, hotels at c.20% and shopping
centres at c.25%.
Whilst it's important to note that the grocery sector
has lower margins than some of these comparable retail or leisure
sectors, it is also important to note that typical EBITDAR margins
at the store level are around 12%. This provides approximately 3x
cover of rent at the market standard rent to turnover, which makes
rents highly sustainable at that level.
Currently, SUPR's portfolio sits at c.4% rent to
turnover and is therefore considered to be approximately rack
rented from a UK grocery property perspective.
I believe the affordability of rent is one of the
reasons that supermarket property investment performance over the
last 15 years has been a stand-out positive performer relative to
other asset classes despite multiple periods of macro-economic
uncertainty. Having said that, not all supermarket property is
equal and specialists like the Atrato Capital team are essential to
ensure the right asset selection for the long term.
Question 4:
Like-for-like sales growth in 2024 is lower than 2023 with staffing
costs rising, does this signal margin pressure for the multichannel
grocers?
A key point here is that disinflation rather than
deflation is taking effect across the grocery sector - prices are
rising more slowly, rather than falling. In the four weeks to July
2024, the rate was 1.6%, the lowest rate since September 2021 and
far below the recent peak of 19.0% seen in March last year. Against
that backdrop, like-for-like sales growth will be naturally subdued
verses the inflation-fuelled comparatives.
However, living standards for the average customer are
gradually improving, with wage growth outpacing price inflation for
several quarters, which will in turn feed both enhanced sales
volumes and improved product mix for the grocers. We are clearly
seeing the benefits of that in the latest grocery market share data
with Tesco and Sainsbury's capturing a further 100bps combined
market share over their rivals and reaffirming their profit
targets.
This is why traditional grocers carry an extensive
range and mix in their supermarkets to cater for the changing needs
and buying trends of the customers' shopping basket and that
customer focus has sustained the success of the grocers for the
last 100 years
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
We set out below our key performance indicators for
the Company.
KPI
|
Definition
|
Performance
|
1. Total Shareholder
Return
|
Shareholder return is one of the Group's principal
measures of performance.
Total Shareholder Return ("TSR") is measured by
reference to the growth in the Group's share price over a period,
plus dividends declared for that period.
|
8% for the year to 30 June
2024
(Six months ended
31 December 2023: 23.2%, 30 June 2023: -34%)
|
2. WAULT
|
WAULT measures the average unexpired lease term of the
Property Portfolio, weighted by the Portfolio valuations.
|
12 years WAULT as at 30
June 2024 (31 December 2023: 13 years, 30 June 2023: 14
years)
|
3. EPRA NTA per share
|
The value of our assets (based on an independent
valuation) less the book value of our liabilities, attributable to
Shareholders and calculated in accordance with EPRA guidelines.
EPRA states three measures of NAV to be used; of which the Group
deem EPRA NTA as the most meaningful measure. See Note 27 for more
information.
|
87 pence per share as at 30
June 2024 (31 December 2023: 88p, 30 June 2023: 93p)
|
4. Net Loan to Value
|
The proportion of our Portfolio gross asset value that
is funded by borrowings calculated as balance sheet borrowings less
cash balances divided by total investment properties valuation.
|
37% as at 30 June 2024 (31
December 2023: 33%, 30 June 2023: 37%)
|
5. Adjusted EPS*
|
EPRA earnings adjusted for company specific items to
reflect the underlying profitability of the business.
|
6.1 pence per share for the
year ended 30 June 2024 (31 December 2023: 2.9p, 30 June 2023:
5.8p)
|
Adjusted earnings is a performance measure used by
the Board to assess the Group's financial performance and dividend
payments. The metric adjusts EPRA earnings by deducting one-off
items such as debt restructuring costs and adding back finance
income on derivatives held at fair value through profit and loss.
Adjusted Earnings is considered a better reflection of the measure
over which the Board assesses the Group's trading performance and
dividend cover. Finance income received from derivatives held at
fair value through profit and loss are added back to EPRA earnings
as this reflects the cash received from the derivative hedges in
the period and therefore gives a better reflection of the Group's
net finance costs. Debt restructuring costs relate to the
acceleration of unamortised arrangement fees following the
refinancing of the Group's debt facilities during the year.
Adjusted EPS reflects the adjusted earnings defined
above attributable to each shareholder.
The Group uses alternative performance measures
including the European Public Real Estate ("EPRA") Best Practice
Recommendations ("BPR") to supplement its IFRS measures as the
Board considers that these measures give users of the annual report
and financial information the best understanding of the underlying
performance of the Group's property portfolio. The EPRA measures
are widely recognised and used by public real estate companies and
investors and seek to improve transparency, comparability and
relevance of published results in the sector.
Reconciliations between EPRA measures and the IFRS
financial statements can be found in Notes 11 and 27 to the
financial information.
EPRA PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
The table below shows additional performance
measures, calculated in accordance with the Best Practices
Recommendations of the European Public Real Estate Association. We
provide these measures to aid comparison with other European real
estate businesses.
For a full reconciliation of all EPRA performance
indicators, please see the Notes to EPRA measures within the
supplementary section of the financial information.
Measure
|
Definition
|
Performance
|
1. EPRA EPS
|
A measure of EPS designed by EPRA to present
underlying earnings from core operating activities.
|
4.3 pence per share for the
year ended 30 June 2024 (30 June 2023: 4.6p)
|
2. EPRA Net Reinstatement Value
("NRV") per share
|
An EPRA NAV per share metric which assumes that
entities never sell assets and aims to represent the value required
to rebuild the entity.
|
97 pence per share as at 30
June 2024 (30 June 2023: 103p)
|
3. EPRA Net Tangible Assets
("NTA") per share
|
An EPRA NAV per share metric which assumes entities
buy and sell assets, thereby crystallising certain levels of
unavoidable deferred tax.
|
87 pence per share as at 30
June 2024 (30 June 2023: 93p)
|
4. EPRA Net Disposal Value
("NDV") per share
|
An EPRA NAV per share metric which represents the
Shareholders' value under a disposal scenario, where deferred tax,
financial instruments and certain other adjustments are calculated
to the full extent of their liability, net of any resulting
tax.
|
90 pence per share as at 30
June 2024 (30 June 2023: 98p)
|
5. EPRA Net Initial Yield ("NIY")
& EPRA "Topped-Up" Net Initial Yield
|
Annualised rental income based on the cash rents
passing at the balance sheet date, less non-recoverable property
operating expenses, divided by the market value of the property,
increased with (estimated) purchasers' costs.
|
5.9% as at 30 June 2024 (30
June 2023: 5.5%)
|
6. EPRA Vacancy Rate
|
Estimated Market Rental Value ("ERV") of vacant space
divided by ERV of the whole portfolio.
|
0.5% as at 30 June 2024 (30
June 2023: 0.4%)
|
7. EPRA Cost Ratio (Including
direct vacancy costs)
|
Administrative & operating costs (including costs
of direct vacancy) divided by gross rental income.
|
14.7% for the year ended 30
June 2024 (30 June 2023: 15.5%)
|
8. EPRA Cost Ratio (Excluding
direct vacancy costs)
|
Administrative & operating costs (excluding costs
of direct vacancy) divided by gross rental income.
|
14.4% for the year ended 30
June 2024 (30 June 2023: 15.2%)
|
9. EPRA LTV
|
Net debt divided by total property portfolio and other
eligible assets.
|
38.8% as at 30 June 2024
(30 June 2023: 35.2%)
|
10. EPRA Like-for-like Rental
Growth
|
Changes in net rental income for those properties held
for the duration of both the current and comparative reporting
period.
|
Rental increase of 2.1% for
the year ended 30 June 2024 (30 June 2023: 2.7%)
|
11. EPRA Capital Expenditure
|
Amounts spent for the purchase and development of
investment properties (including any capitalised transaction
costs).
|
£146.2 million for the
year ended 30 June 2024 (30 June 2023: £377.3
million)
|
INVESTMENT ADVISER'S
REPORT
Atrato is the Company's Investment Adviser. Ben Green
(Principal) and Robert Abraham (Fund Manager) discuss SUPR's
performance and the long-term outlook for the business.
SUPR's performance remains strong at the
operational level
The Company's operational performance remains
strong. It has been another year in which SUPR has achieved 100%
rent collection and 100% occupancy from its tenant base of leading
supermarket operators. Coupled with this, the Company has achieved
4.0% like-for-like rental growth on leases that have been subject
to review in the year, driven by inflation-linked contractual
uplifts.
Our key tenants continue to perform strongly with
impressive revenue growth. This is particularly true of the types
of the omnichannel stores that SUPR owns in the UK and France.
Sainsbury's and Tesco, which represent 77% of the portfolio by
value have reported like-for-like sales growth of
10.3%15 and 7.7%16 respectively in their full
year results. They reported even higher sales growth figures from
their large format stores, like those owned by SUPR, up by
11.0%15 and 8.2%16 respectively. Importantly,
such revenue growth remains ahead of rental increases, which
ensures that rents remain affordable. Our newest tenant Carrefour
has also performed strongly in its home market in France with ROI
margins up 6.2%17, underpinned by accelerated price
investments which have been more than offset by cost
discipline.
Proactively positioning SUPR for a higher
interest rate world
Our strong operational performance has been largely
offset by higher financing costs due to the higher interest rate
environment and our decision to reduce leverage. This has led to
lower earnings growth and only a modest increase in dividend as we
and the Board seek to position SUPR with a sustainable, long-term,
progressive dividend.
We took two key steps to position the Company for a
higher interest rate world. First, we fixed SUPR's cost of debt
through the period of highest expected interest rates. Second, we
recycled the proceeds from the final tranche of the Sainsbury's
Reversion Portfolio disposal in July 2023 into reducing debt.
Through the second half of the year, as debt costs
reduced, we had the opportunity to grow earnings through accretive
acquisitions. As a result of the prudent actions taken to protect
the balance sheet the Company has been in a strong position to take
advantage of these opportunities.
Taken together with our contracted rental growth and
rigorous cost control, we have positioned SUPR to deliver a
sustainable, progressive dividend in the new higher interest rate
environment.
In our view, valuations have bottomed
out
We saw a valuation decline as at the December
balance sheet date due to the impact on the grocery property market
of higher interest rate expectations. The sterling 5-year swap rate
peaked in July 2023 and this negatively impacted the investment
market in the first half of our financial year.
Valuations held flat over the second half of the
year with the market now having adjusted to expectations of a
long-term UK base rate of around 3.5%. Investment returns at
current market yields look attractive, particularly when
considering the defensive characteristics of grocery.
We have observed a similar dynamic in the French
market with reducing interest rate pressure and valuations at the
bottom of the cycle.
We are of the view that the next movement in
valuations, when it comes, should be positive.
Supermarket rents, affordability and
ERVs
Within the UK supermarket sector, 4% rent to
turnover is seen as the affordable rental level that operators are
willing to pay to secure long-term occupation for strong trading
stores.
Increasing store turnover, has improved the
affordability of supermarket rents and has resulted in SUPR's
portfolio having a ratio of 4% RTO.
Our view is that the valuers systematically
underestimate the rents that UK grocers are willing to pay to
secure trading from a site. This is important for two reasons.
First, it provides us with value opportunities at the point of
acquisition because vendors often underestimate rental potential.
Second, we believe that there is significant embedded value in the
Portfolio which is not reflected in the valuation or the NAV.
A detailed case study on this topic is available on
pages 30 to 32.
Valuation yield metrics for the SUPR
portfolio
Measure
|
Jun-23
|
Dec-23
|
June-24
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
|
NIY
|
5.6%
|
5.8%
|
5.9%
|
UK supermarkets
|
|
|
|
NIY
|
5.4%
|
5.7%
|
5.8%
|
NRY
|
4.6%
|
5.0%
|
5.1%
|
NEY
|
5.5%
|
5.7%
|
5.8%
|
The Net Reversionary Yield ("NRY") provided by our
valuer for our UK supermarkets applies an average ERV of £22 per
square foot ("per sq.ft.") to SUPR's portfolio which is broadly
in-line with the UK average.
In practice we expect our leases to be extended
(regeared) prior to expiry and at a level which would be higher
than this average, due to the strong performing nature of the
stores owned by SUPR.
Assuming UK supermarket rents regeared to 4% of
turnover it would produce an NRY closer to the 5.9% current NIY on
the portfolio, demonstrating the potential reversionary upside that
can be achieved on the portfolio.
As an off-market sale and leaseback transaction, our
Carrefour rents are set at 2.1% RTO, versus the average of 2.5% in
France.
Attractiveness of French grocery market and
Carrefour
The Company's entry into the €290 billion French
grocery market18 was the most strategically significant
development of the year.
The European grocery property market provides the
Company the opportunity to benefit from a diversification of the
portfolio, an increased exposure to investment grade tenant
covenants and lower cost of financing. Due to the size of the
European market, we can be highly selective in assessing investment
opportunities.
The French market has attractive similarities to the
UK. Supermarkets are the primary grocery sales channel and the
French market is dominated by a small number of operators. France
also has Europe's largest online grocery market, which is primarily
serviced by an omnichannel store network and is growing
rapidly.
Carrefour is one of the largest grocery operators in
the world with forecast annual global sales of €100.4 billion in
202419. In France, Carrefour holds a similar position to
Sainsbury's in the UK as the second largest operator with 19.6% of
grocery sales20. As part of its 2026 strategic plan
outlined in 2022, Carrefour has set ambitious online growth targets
to increase online sales to 30% of total sales by 2026, and its
online channel is forecast to grow by 8.25% in
202421.
Growing earnings through highly selective,
accretive acquisitions
1) First
international acquisition via a sale and lease back transaction
with Carrefour
In April 2024, SUPR acquired a sale and leaseback
portfolio of 17 strong trading omnichannel stores in France through
a direct transaction with Carrefour.
The stores were selected based on a detailed
analysis including trading performance, local demographics and
competition. The stores have highly affordable rents and were
acquired at an attractive 6.3% NIY.
The transaction was financed through an existing
revolving credit facility with HSBC, and post period end was
refinanced via a Euro denominated private placement at a cost of
4.4%. The positive cash yield is accretive to the portfolio and
supportive of earnings growth through long-term, index-linked
leases. A case study on the transaction is provided on pages 20 to
22.
We were able to leverage our deep sector
relationships and reputation as a trusted counterparty to leading
grocery operators, to work with Carrefour on this off-market
transaction. This was only the second ever sale and leaseback
transaction conducted by Carrefour in France, and the first in 12
years.
2) The
continued attractiveness of the UK, albeit a reduced addressable
market
With the UK grocery market continuing to perform
strongly, we see attractive opportunities in the UK supermarket
space, albeit now focused on Tesco and Sainsbury's due to
comparatively less attractive covenants of the more highly
leveraged multichannel operators, Asda and Morrisons.
In the UK we have focused on shorter lease assets,
particularly those which we view as being mispriced by the market
due to an underestimation of affordable market rent. The target
assets are let to strong tenant covenants (i.e., Tesco or
Sainsbury's), with an attractive yield providing an accretive
spread to the current cost of debt. These opportunities are
currently more accretive to earnings than longer lease, rack rented
assets, which are currently pricing more keenly. An example
transaction is Tesco Stoke, acquired in March 2024 and on which
there is a case study on pages 16 to 17.
A tale of two halves for the UK investment
market, while operator activity across both sale and leaseback and
store buybacks has been prominent
Investment market volumes for the 12 months remained
broadly in line with the £1.7 billion average since the Company's
IPO, as liquidity for the asset class remains strong. Unlike other
sectors which have seen volumes fall away in a higher interest rate
environment, through rapid repricing and continued investor demand,
supermarket volumes have remained consistent. Supermarkets are a
defensive asset class with investment appetite from a broad range
of purchasers from institutions through to high net worth
individuals.
5 yearly supermarket investment
volumes22
We are however beginning to see more limited supply
- particularly of stock in the UK which is suitable for SUPR in
terms of being accretive to the cost of debt and therefore to
earnings, whilst maintaining tenant quality.
2024 transactions
breakdown22
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vendors
|
Value (£m)
|
|
Purchasers
|
Value (£m)
|
|
Asda
|
650
|
|
Realty
Income Corporation
|
825
|
|
Morrisons
|
196
|
|
Tesco
Plc
|
127
|
|
Abrdn
|
162
|
|
M&G
|
125
|
|
Lothbury
IM
|
133
|
|
ICG
|
103
|
|
Waitrose
|
125
|
|
MDSR
|
98
|
|
Other
|
723
|
|
Other
|
711
|
Total
|
1,989
|
|
Total
|
1,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the UK, the two largest sellers of assets during
the year were operators. Asda (£650 million) and Morrisons (£196
million) both sold stores to Realty Income, subject to 20-year
inflation linked leases. Waitrose also undertook a £125 million
sale & leaseback with M&G. Each of these transactions
attracted a lot of institutional interest. Asda and Morrisons also
separately sold off their petrol forecourts to reduce leverage. We
believe that the capital raised in these processes makes further
significant sale and leaseback activity from these operators
unlikely.
Tesco spent £127 million during the year buying back
stores, including a 111,000 sq.ft. store in Sutton Coldfield for
c.£40 million - a large format omnichannel store, highlighting the
strategic importance of such assets. We continue to see Tesco
selectively participate in the investment market, depending on
capital made available to the property team at any given time. Our
tenants' competing demands for capital dictate their level of
activity in the buyback market - this means that we continue to be
able to buy some of Tesco's best performing stores. However, we do
have the risk of a shrinking opportunity, as each store bought back
by an operator is unlikely to return to the leasehold market in the
future.
In addition to M&G, this year has also seen the
return of other traditional institutional supermarket landlords as
buyers in L&G (£46 million), Abrdn (£18 million), and DTZ
Investors (£56 million).
Investment volumes in France were below average in
2023 totalling €320 million. However, volumes in H1 2024 reached
€306 million which is a 135% increase year-on-year and 13% ahead of
average since H1 2014. New retail development is at a 20 year low,
a trend which we think will continue due to the net
artificialisation (ZAN) of land by 2050. We expect a shift towards
redevelopment of existing assets into mixed-use spaces rather than
new developments. This will therefore reduce the amount of retail
space making existing assets more valuable.
Tight control of costs delivering one of
the lowest EPRA cost ratios in the sector
In seeking to drive earnings growth we also maintain
a tight control of costs. The Company's cost base is already one of
the lowest across FTSE 350-listed REITs, with an EPRA cost ratio of
14.7% and is targeting a lower EPRA cost ratio in the coming year,
in line with our goal of having the lowest cost ratio amongst the
externally managed FTSE 350-listed REITs.
EPRA cost ratios (including direct vacancy
costs): FTSE 350-listed REITs23
Defensive nature of supermarket real estate
continues to prove attractive to debt markets
During the year we agreed new debt facilities with
SMBC of £104.5 million. Post balance sheet we agreed a new £100
million unsecured facility with ING and a private placement of €83
million loan notes at an all in fixed cost of 4.4% for seven
years.
Both of the bank facilities are attractively priced
at an average margin of 1.5% over SONIA. We have fully fixed the
cost of these financings through hedging.
The cost of the private placement is fixed at 4.4%
and is highly attractive when compared to the yield on our French
supermarket assets. In addition, the Euro denomination provides a
natural hedge for the Company's investment in the Carrefour
portfolio acquisition in France.
These transactions, along with our BBB+ Fitch
rating, underscore the Company's strong balance sheet, high-quality
assets and tenants and our ongoing ability to secure debt from
financially strong international lenders.
The ability to raise debt has allowed the Company to
cautiously increase leverage up to 37% to enable it to take
advantage of attractive acquisition opportunities, while
maintaining significant headroom in debt covenants.
Including post balance sheet events, the Company has
100% of drawn debt fixed or hedged at a weighted average finance
cost of 3.8% (30 June 2023: 3.1%).
Continued progress on sustainability
reporting
Investing responsibly for long-term value creation
remains at the heart of the Company's business model. The Company
has continued to refine its approach this year improving ESG data
processes and setting long-term targets for the Company.
The Company's refreshed sustainability strategy
consists of three key pillars:
1. Climate and Environment
2. Tenant and Community Engagement
3. Responsible Business
These pillars are underpinned by the UN Sustainable
Development Goals the Company has identified as most material to
the business, and by the Investment Adviser's ongoing responsible
investment commitments including in respect of the Net Zero Asset
Managers initiative, UN Global Compact and UN Principles for
Responsible Investment.
The Company has published its second standalone
Sustainability Report which details its sustainability performance
and progress against the three pillars of the sustainability
strategy and plans for the year ahead. Highlights from the
Sustainability Report, beyond the Company's science-based target
setting, include the Company's first donation to the Atrato
Foundation, improvements in ESG data sharing with tenants and
further environmental asset management initiatives to benefit
occupiers and communities. For the first time the Company has also
undertaken external assurance over its reported location-based
Scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG figures for FY24. The Assurance Report is
available on the Sustainability section of the Company's
website.
In addition to the Company's Sustainability Report,
disclosures in line with the TCFD recommended disclosures and the
Company's Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting ("SECR"), have
been included within the Annual Report on pages 39 to 51.
Secondary listing on the Johannesburg Stock
Exchange ("JSE")
The Company is in the process of applying for a
secondary inward listing on the Main Board of the Johannesburg
Stock Exchange by introduction. The listing of the Company on the
JSE is expected to become effective by the end of the calendar
year, subject to various regulatory approvals in South Africa.
The Company will not place or issue any new shares
in connection with its application for a secondary listing on the
JSE and will remain listed on the Closed-ended investment funds
category of the FCA's Official List and traded on the LSE's Main
Market. PSG Capital Proprietary Limited has been appointed as
Corporate Advisor and Sponsor in South Africa.
The Company believes that admission to trading of
the shares on the JSE will be beneficial to the Company and its
shareholders. The secondary listing should contribute to liquidity
in the Group's shares through its increased profile and improved
accessibility in the South African market, where a number of
investors have already shown strong interest in investing in the
Company, driven by its high-quality portfolio of omnichannel
supermarkets and secure income providing an attractive
dividend.
Outlook
We remain resolutely focused on delivering
sustainable earnings growth for the Company in our role as
Investment Adviser. Whilst acknowledging the ongoing impact of
macro factors such as interest rates which are ultimately outside
of our control, we continue to drive strong performance at an
operational level. We believe this will translate into positive
momentum for the Company.
In the Company's core UK market we see accretive
opportunities that meet our disciplined approach to capital
deployment, albeit in a reduced addressable market. France offers
an extension of this strategy and an attractive potential further
source of earnings growth. Opportunities in geographies outside of
the UK will only be considered where asset quality can be
maintained and where we see attractive relative value. Should we
look to further increase the Company's exposure to this market, we
would first consult with shareholders and revisit the Company's
Investment Policy.
Following receipt of the final portion of the
Sainsbury's Reversion Portfolio disposal proceeds received at the
beginning of the year, the most prudent decision was to pay down
debt rather than deploy that capital into new assets and expose the
Company to higher leverage and potential valuation decline. As
valuations have stabilised and market sentiment has improved, we
are more comfortable in gradually normalising leverage levels.
We continue to consider all options for the Company
to achieve earnings growth. We are also exploring disposal and JV
opportunities which present capital recycling opportunities, the
benefit of which comes both through proving the portfolio NAV in
the open market and through opportunities to redeploy sales
proceeds in the most earnings accretive manner for shareholders at
that time.
We currently consider that the Company's debt
finance capacity is best deployed into accretive acquisitions to
grow earnings. However, the option of share buybacks is
continuously under review by the Investment Adviser and the
Board.
In summary, we are focused on delivering earnings
accretion through a rigorous approach to capital allocation. This,
combined with tight cost controls in the business, as evidenced
through the Company's continually decreasing EPRA cost ratio,
should deliver efficient earnings growth and increased returns to
shareholders.
THE COMPANY'S PORTFOLIO
The Company has built a portfolio of strong trading,
'mission critical' omnichannel supermarkets backed by leading
grocery operators.
The central pillar of the Company's investment policy
is to acquire omnichannel supermarkets that form a key part of our
tenants' last mile fulfilment networks. These stores offer both an
online provision and in-store shopping, helping to capture a
greater share of the grocery market. Currently 93% of our
supermarket assets are omnichannel, by value.
The portfolio benefits from long unexpired lease terms
with predominantly upwards only, index linked leases, helping to
provide long-term income with contractional rental growth.
Within the UK, operators typically look at the
affordability of rent based on a benchmark of c.4% rent to
turnover, simply seen as two weeks of trade. The Group's UK
supermarkets average rent to turnover is 4%, which equates to £24
per sq.ft. We have highly secure income with 100% rent collection
during the year and Tesco and Sainsbury's accounting for 75% of the
Company's rent roll.
During the year, the Group acquired a hand-picked
portfolio of Carrefour supermarkets in an off market, direct sale
and leaseback with the operator. The assets form a key part of
Carrefour's omnichannel operation with 15 stores operating Drive
"Click & Collect". This channel accounts for 80% of online
grocery in France.
The standalone stores are subject to annual, uncapped
inflation-linked rent reviews with 12 year unexpired lease terms
(tenant only break at year 10) and are let on low and affordable
rents of €7 per sq.ft. with an average RTO of 2.1%, below the RTO
average of 2.5% in France. The rents produce a low capital value of
€110 per sq.ft. The transaction helps to increase the Group's
exposure to strong tenant covenants, further diversifies the
portfolio and promotes further income growth through index-linked
rent reviews.
As part of the Company's investment strategy to
acquire high-quality, strong trading supermarkets, it is sometimes
necessary to acquire complementary non-grocery units that are
co-located with the store. These units often create a retail
destination helping to drive further footfall into the supermarket.
Non-grocery assets represent 6% of the Portfolio by value.
During the year, the Company selectively strengthened
its Portfolio with the addition of 20 supermarkets for a combined
total of £135.8 million24.
· July 2023: A Sainsbury's in Gloucester, for
£17.4 million24. The store has a 15-year unexpired lease
term25 and is subject to 5-yearly upwards only, open
market rent reviews.
· July 2023: A Sainsbury's in Derby, for £19.0
million24. The store has a 15-year unexpired lease
term25 and is subject to 5-yearly upwards only, open
market rent reviews.
· March 2024: A Tesco in Stoke-on-Trent,
for £34.7 million24. The store has a 11-year unexpired
lease term and is subject to annual upwards only RPI-linked rent
reviews.
· April 2024: A portfolio of 17 Carrefour
supermarkets located in north and north west France, for £64.7
million24. The portfolio was a direct sale and leaseback
with Carrefour with 12-year unexpired lease terms25 and
subject to annual, uncapped inflation-linked, rent review.
The acquisitions during the year were purchased at an
average net initial yield of 6.7% (7.0% UK, 6.3% EUR) providing an
attractive spread to the Group's incremental cost of debt and were
immediately accretive to earnings. The increased exposure to
index-linked income also generates further contractual earnings
growth underpinned by strong tenants.
Acquisitions during the year were financed using
existing headroom within our debt facilities and subsequently
through the €83 million private placement which was announced in
July 2024.
For more information on financing arrangements refer
to note 19 of the financial information.
|
Tenant
|
Exposure
by
rent roll
|
Exposure
by
Valuation
|
Tesco
|
48%
|
48%
|
Sainsbury's
|
27%
|
29%
|
Morrisons
|
5%
|
5%
|
Waitrose
|
4%
|
4%
|
Carrefour
|
4%
|
4%
|
Asda
|
2%
|
2%
|
Aldi
|
1%
|
1%
|
M&S
|
1%
|
1%
|
Non-food
|
8%
|
6%
|
Total
|
100%
|
100%
|
|
The Portfolio's weighting towards investment grade
tenants provides secure long-term income with a weighted average
unexpired lease term of 12 years. In addition, the portfolio is
heavily weighted towards upwards only inflation-linked rent
reviews. The average cap on our inflation-linked leases' rental
uplifts is 4%.
The Portfolio's weighting towards upwards only,
inflation-linked rent reviews is 80% with 58% of the Portfolio
being reviewed annually.
Indexation
|
Income mix by
rent review type
|
RPI
|
70%
|
CPI
|
6%
|
ILC
|
4%
|
Fixed
|
2%
|
OMV
|
18%
|
Total
|
100%
|
|
Rent
review
|
Income mix by
rent review type
|
Annual
|
58%
|
5
yearly
|
41%
|
7
yearly
|
1%
|
Total
|
100%
|
|
UK rental
caps
|
% of UK supermarket
index-linked portfolio
|
0-1
%
|
0%
|
1-2
%
|
1%
|
2-3
%
|
13%
|
3-4
%
|
64%
|
4-5
%
|
22%
|
Total
|
100%
|
|
The rent profile of the supermarkets is broadly in
line with the market at 4% RTO. The rental maturity profile is well
dispersed with the first material regear in 2029.
WAULT
|
WAULT
breakdown
|
WAULT
rental breakdown
|
WAULT
count breakdown
|
0-1
yrs
|
0.0%
|
-
|
0
|
1-2
yrs
|
0.0%
|
-
|
0
|
2-3
yrs
|
0.2%
|
0.2
|
1
|
3-4
yrs
|
0.0%
|
-
|
0
|
4-5
yrs
|
0.0%
|
-
|
0
|
5-6
yrs
|
3.0%
|
3.1
|
1
|
6-7
yrs
|
4.4%
|
4.6
|
2
|
7-8
yrs
|
6.1%
|
6.4
|
4
|
8-9
yrs
|
4.8%
|
5.0
|
5
|
9-10
yrs
|
12.1%
|
12.6
|
21
|
10+
yrs
|
69.4%
|
72.3
|
39
|
Total
|
100.0%
|
104.2
|
73
|
|
|
|
The environmental efficiency of our stores continues
to be a key priority for our asset management initiatives,
selective acquisitions and is supported by the ongoing investment
by grocery tenants into respective store estates. A breakdown of
our supermarket EPC ratings can be seen below:
Supermarket EPC
breakdown
|
EPC rating
|
% of UK
supermarket
Portfolio by
value
|
A
|
4%
|
B
|
52%
|
C
|
31%
|
D
|
13%
|
Total
|
100%
|
|
Active asset management
delivering additional value and improving sustainability of
sites
The Company continues to seek sustainability and
value creation initiatives at our larger sites which are not fully
demised to the core supermarket tenants and therefore benefit from
greater landlord control.
Alongside our tenants, we are looking at ways to
increase the number of Electric Vehicle ("EV") charging points at
larger sites. We now have 58 EV charging bays across five sites,
all completed at zero capex cost to the Company. Current EV
sites:
· Morrisons,
Workington
· Morrisons,
Wisbech
· Tesco,
Bradley Stoke
· Tesco,
Chineham
· Tesco,
Beaumont Leys
Works were completed at Tesco, Thetford in
partnership with Atrato Onsite Energy plc where Tesco entered into
a 20-year Power Purchase Agreement ("PPA") for a new solar
installation on the rooftop at the store. The EPC rating was
re-assessed post installation and improved from a C to a B.
Opportunities to add complementary discount grocery
operators continue to progress. At Tesco, Chineham, the existing
planning consent was successfully implemented and terms are agreed
with a discount grocery retailer. We have had three additional
offers for new discount food stores across the portfolio.
At Tesco, Chineham, McDonald's has commenced fit out
works of a unit with a new 25-year lease. In addition to this, Pets
Corner is upsizing into a new unit. At Tesco, Bradley Stoke, works
are currently being undertaken to amalgamate two units, one of
which was vacant at acquisition and the other let on a
concessionary basis, with B&M committing to a new 10-year
lease, rendering the site 100% let.
Other developments are being considered at
Sainsbury's, Newcastle, Morrisons, Workington and Tesco, Bradley
Stoke and various negotiations are ongoing with potential tenants
for those sites.
Portfolio valuation
Cushman & Wakefield valued the Portfolio as at 30
June 2024, in accordance with the RICS Valuation - Global Standards
which incorporate the International Valuation Standards and the
RICS UK Valuation Standards edition current at the valuation
date.
The properties were valued individually without any
premium/discount applying to the Portfolio as a whole. The
Portfolio market value was £1,775.7 million, an increase of £82.8
million reflecting a valuation decline of £53.0 million (including
currency exchange movements), which was offset by new acquisitions
of £135.8 million pre acquisition costs. This valuation reflects a
net initial yield of 5.9% and a like-for-like valuation decline of
3.2% since 30 June 2023. The benchmark MSCI All Property Capital
Index during the same period was down 4.5%.
The decline in valuation reflects the outward shift in
property yields applied by valuers across the real estate sector as
a result of higher interest rates and the macroeconomic
environment. This was largely recognised in the first half of the
year, with a like-for-like valuation decline of 3.2% reported in
the Company's valuation as at 31 December 2023. Valuations remained
broadly flat in the second half of the year.
The valuation decline in the year has however been
partially mitigated by our contractual inflation-linked rental
uplifts. The average annualised increase in rent from rent reviews
performed during the year was 4.0%. 82% of the Company's leases
benefit from contractual rental uplifts, with 80% linked to
inflation and 2% with fixed uplifts.
THE GROCERY MARKET
UK
Non-discretionary grocery market continuing to
experience strong growth
The UK grocery market has highlighted its defensive,
non-discretionary characteristics this year with sales growth of
5.8% against a very strong inflation-led comparator of 9.2% for
2023. Total grocery market sales are forecast to be £251.6 billion
in 2024, an increase of £59.6 billion or 31% since pre-pandemic
levels in 2019.
While the sector growth will continue to ease as
inflation moderates in 2025 in year-on-year percentage terms, IGD
projects continued healthy absolute sales growth in the coming
years. With forecast annual growth of around 3% to 2029, the UK
grocery market is expected to reach £296 billion in the same
year.
The growth from 2019 out to IGD's projected total
sales figure would represent a 4.4% compound annual growth rate.
The future projected growth is in line with long run RPI/CPI
projections and underlines the grocers' ability to efficiently pass
through inflation to consumers. The increased sales revenue at the
store level will support higher rents over the medium term.
Institute of Grocery Distribution ("IGD") UK
Grocery Market Value 2019-2029 (forecast)
This track record of strong growth in the sector has
attracted new institutional investors into the grocery real estate
investment market and has also seen a continued programme of store
buybacks by Tesco with four stores purchased by the grocery
operator in the year.
Online grocery channel
returned to growth following a rebase post
pandemic
Online grocery now accounts for 12%
of the total market. Online market share has fallen back from the
pandemic peak of 15%, but having rebased to 12%, it is still one of
the fastest growing channels according to Kantar. The online
channel was permanently enlarged throughout the pandemic - over 50%
of online grocery shoppers during 2020 were new to the
channel26 and much of this change in consumer behaviour
has been sticky.
Omnichannel stores are optimally
placed to benefit from the combined growth of both in store sales
and online. Operators are able to increase online capacity at low
cost and benefit from shorter drive times due to their existing
omnichannel stores' proximity to customers. This results in a
greater number of deliveries per hour and drives greater
profitability than the centralised fulfilment (or 'dark store')
model. Tesco recently announced that online sales participation is
stable at 13% of UK sales with basket sizes up 4.2% and online
sales up 10%. The return to growth of the online channel is evident
in the latest IGD forecast which predicts growth of 27% (£6
billion) by 2029.
Online grocery spend (UK)
(2017 to 2023 actual, 2024 to 2026 forecasted)
Omnichannel stores capture the largest share
of growth
Large format omnichannel stores, such as those which
the Company targets, have captured the largest share of sales
growth in the sector since 201927. In that time the
total UK grocery sector has increased from £192 billion in 2019 to
£252 billion, with omnichannel supermarkets accounting for £20
billion of that growth.
Importantly, this growth is being generated from
existing store estates meaning this is like-for-like sales growth,
resulting in improved sales densities and enhanced profitability at
the store level. From a landlord perspective, this ensures that
rents remain affordable for tenants, particularly as sales growth
has been running ahead of capped rental uplifts. It also provides a
strong backdrop for higher rents in the future.
Large format stores have the scale to offer the full
product range giving customers the widest product choice, whilst
also offering the best value to customers through in-store only and
loyalty scheme product offers. In the current inflationary
environment shoppers are looking to achieve best value on their
purchases. Tesco and Sainsbury's loyalty schemes which offer
attractive discounts to members, have been very successful
Sainsbury's reporting that nine out of ten £80+ weekly shopping
baskets are sold to customers using their Nectar loyalty card.
Tesco and Sainsbury's
maintained market share whilst discounter growth begins to
slow
The UK grocery market is highly consolidated with the
six leading operators accounting for 83% of the market. These
operators can be divided into two groups: the four multichannel
(in-store and online) operators, Tesco, Sainsbury's, Asda and
Morrisons, and two limited range in-store only discounters, Aldi
and Lidl.
5-year operator market share (UK) (June 2019 -
June 2024)28
Tesco and Sainsbury's, the Company's key tenants,
continue to be the leading players in the UK grocery space with
27.7% and 15.2% market share respectively. Both operators have
increased market share in the last 12 months and are seeing the
benefit of investments in their stores, product ranges and loyalty
schemes. Asda and Morrisons (12.8% and 8.7% market share
respectively) have continued to lose market share following their
highly leveraged takeovers in 2020 and in the face of competition
from the limited range discounters.
Discounter portfolio size (UK),
2017-2023
While Aldi and Lidl achieved impressive growth which
accelerated in the period from 2020 to 2023, with Aldi's market
share growing from 7.5% to 10.2% and Lidl's growing from 5.8% to
8.1% in the period, this growth appears to have slowed. In the case
of Aldi, this growth reversed in 2024 with market share marginally
declining to 10.0% while Lidl increased market share at a lower
annual rate to 8.1%. This lower growth can be linked to several
factors including a reduced rate of store openings which had
previously been the key driver of market share growth.
The challenge for the discounters will be achieving
further growth whilst maintaining profitability. 98% of the
Company's UK portfolio already has a discounter present within a
10-minute drivetime. We expect new store opening by the discounters
to cannibalise existing discounter trade and therefore the marginal
profit of new stores will be diluted.
Lower inflation expected to drive grocery
profitability
Grocery price inflation has driven significantly
higher revenues for supermarkets in recent years. Whilst the
ability for supermarkets to pass through inflation to consumers
highlights the non-discretionary nature of grocery, there has of
course been an impact on consumers' shopping habits. Cost of living
pressures have decreased consumer purchasing power, which has
resulted in a trading down to supermarkets' own brand and value
ranges. Through investment in cost reduction programmes and
improved efficiency, coupled with product price increases,
operators have largely been able to preserve squeezed margins.
As food price inflation begins to moderate, we expect
consumers to again adjust their behaviour, driving volume growth.
However, the operators will continue to benefit from the cost
efficiencies the high inflation rates of recent years have required
and therefore we see volume growth in the coming years being a
driver of increased profitability.
The highly competitive and ultra-low margin nature of
the Discount market has meant Aldi and Lidl have had to increase
prices faster than other operators in order to protect thin margins
of 1-2%. Whilst the Discount channel has seen increasing market
share, this has primarily been driven by increasing prices with
Lidl and Aldi inflating prices by 25.7% and 23.1% respectively over
the three months to April 202329.
ONS: Grocery inflation (Jun 2020 - Jun
2024)
With inflation beginning to moderate, grocery volumes
are expected to increase as household cost pressures reduce,
encouraging higher spending and purchasing a broader range of
products, including non-essentials and premium items.
Tesco and Sainsbury's have both recently announced a
return to volume growth with increased basket sizes.
FRANCE
France Grocery Market Value (2019-2023,
2024-2028 (forecast))30
The French grocery market, one of the largest in the
world by total value, has shown consistent growth over a prolonged
period. The defensive and non-discretionary sector has experienced
YoY sales growth of 2.1% against a strong average inflation-led
comparator of 5.6% for 2023. Total market sales are forecasted to
be €290 billion in 2024, an increase of €44 billion or 18% since
2019. The French grocery sector is expected to reach €321 billion
by 2028 representing an annual increase of c.3%.
Insee: Grocery inflation (Jun 2020 - Jun
2024)
Similar to the UK, France has seen significant
inflation pressure in recent years, helping to drive revenue growth
at the expense of volumes as consumers changed purchasing habits to
manage budgets. Grocery inflation increased to an all-time high of
over 15% in 2023, up from 0.8% in 2020. As inflationary pressures
ease, we expect to see volumes increase and consumers return to
more traditional shopping habits.
French grocery market share (July
2024)31
The French grocery market is highly consolidated with
60% of total market share controlled by three grocery operators;
E.Leclerc, Carrefour and Intermarche. Over the last 6 months,
Carrefour has increased market share by 0.3% to 19.6%. It has
accelerated its price investment programme, the effect of which has
been to increase market share in the face of competition from
cheaper alternative grocers, while preserving profitability.
Carrefour's increase in market share was also driven by volume
growth as consumers return to traditional shopping habits and the
effects of inflation subside.
French Online grocery spend
(2017 to 2023 actual, 2024 to 2026 forecasted)
Online market share in France has been permanently
enlarged due to an increase in take up throughout the pandemic. The
channel has grown by 93% between 2018 and 2024. The channel has
been further strengthened by investment programmes by operators
such as Carrefour which, across the group, is planning to invest €3
billion in the online channel32 and for omnichannel
customers to represent 30% of all customers by
202633.
Due to geographic differences between the UK and
France, 80% of online sales are fulfilled via Click & Collect
vs 20% in the UK. Operators will use large fulfilment centres
'hubs' to pick and pack dry goods which are then delivered to
stores which operate as 'spokes'. These stores are responsible for
picking fresh goods with the combined order collected by the
customer in the car park.
Whilst the French online model is different, it is
built around mission critical omnichannel stores, in strong
locations which provide last mile fulfilment to
consumers.
FINANCIAL OVERVIEW
Atrato Capital Limited, the
Investment Adviser to the Group, is pleased to report the financial
results of the Group for the 12 months ended 30 June 2024.
Financial results
|
30 June 2024
|
30 June 2023
|
|
£'000
|
£'000
|
Net rental income
|
107,232
|
95,244
|
Administrative expenses
|
(15,218)
|
(15,429)
|
Net income from joint
ventures
|
-
|
11,746
|
Net finance
expenses34
|
(16,192)
|
(19,162)
|
Adjusted earnings
|
75,822
|
72,399
|
Net rental
income
In the year, the portfolio generated net rental
income of £107.2 million (30 June 2023: £95.2 million),
representing an increase of £12.0 million or 12.6% compared to the
prior year. The growth in net rental income was driven by a full
period of rental income from property acquisitions and the effect
of contracted rent reviews.
On a like-for-like basis, EPRA net rental income
increased by 2.1%. During the year we successfully completed 22
rent reviews increasing annualised passing rent by £2.9 million,
with the reviews being settled on average 4.8% ahead of previous
passing rent (or 4.0% on an annualised basis).
Net service charge expenditure remained broadly flat
at £0.6 million (30 June 2023: £0.6 million), however our gross to
net margin continues to be among the highest in the sector at 99.4%
(30 June 2023: 99.4%), reflecting the strength of our core
single-let strategy and further highlighting the covenant quality
of our tenant base.
Rent collection rates were 100% for the year to 30
June 2024 (30 June 2023: 100%), as our focus on top trading stores
and covenant quality provided exceptional income security.
Administrative and
other expenses and EPRA cost ratio
Administrative and other expenses, which include all
operational costs of running the business, decreased by £0.2
million to £15.2 million (30 June 2023: £15.4 million). We continue
to monitor the operational efficiency of the Group through its EPRA
cost ratio, which is among the lowest in the sector, and improved
by 80bps to 14.7%.
|
30 June
|
30 June
|
|
2024
|
2023
|
EPRA cost ratio including
direct vacancy costs
|
14.7%
|
15.5%
|
EPRA cost ratio excluding
direct vacancy costs
|
14.4%
|
15.2%
|
Net finance
expenses35
During the year, the Group received £134.9 million
following the divestment of its interest in the Sainsbury's
Reversion Portfolio Joint Venture. Part of the proceeds were
utilised to pay down debt, subsequent to which the Group increased
its debt facilities with a new SMBC facility.
Net finance expenses reduced by £3.0 million to
£16.2 million compared to the prior year, primarily due to the
short-term loan in relation to the Joint Venture in the prior year
and a lower average debt cost.
Adjusted
earnings
The Directors consider adjusted earnings a key
measure of the Company's underlying operating results, and a
reference through which the Board measures dividend cover. Adjusted
earnings therefore excludes one-off items which are non-recurring
in nature and includes finance income on derivatives held at fair
value through profit on loss. Adjusted earnings for the year to 30
June 2024 were £75.8 million (30 June 2023: £72.4 million). On a
per share basis, adjusted earnings increased by 0.3 pence per share
to 6.1 pence for the year to 30 June 2024, an increase of 4% (30
June 2023: 5.8 pence).
A full reconciliation between IFRS and Adjusted
earnings can be found in note 11 of the financial information.
Dividend
In the financial year ended 30 June 2024, the
Company paid the following interim dividends:
Declared
|
Amount
pence per share
|
In respect of the
financial year ended
|
Paid/
to be paid
|
6 July 2023
|
1.500p
|
30 June 2023
|
4 August 2023
|
5 October 2023
|
1.515p
|
30 June 2024
|
16 November 2023
|
4 January 2024
|
1.515p
|
30 June 2024
|
14 February 2024
|
4 April 2024
|
1.515p
|
30 June 2024
|
16 May 2024
|
Post period end, the Company declared an interim
dividend in respect of the financial year ended 30 June 2024 of
1.515 pence per Ordinary Share (the "Fourth Quarterly Dividend").
The Fourth Quarterly Dividend was paid on 16 August 2024 as a
Property Income Distribution ("PID") to shareholders on the
register as of 12 July 2024. The Company has now declared four
quarterly dividends totalling 6.06 pence per Ordinary Share in
respect of the financial year ended 30 June 2024.
EPRA net tangible
assets and IFRS net asset
|
|
30 June 2024
|
30 June 2023
|
|
|
£'000
|
£'000
|
Investment property
|
|
1,768,216
|
1,685,690
|
Bank and other
borrowings
|
|
(694,168)
|
(667,465)
|
Cash
|
|
38,691
|
37,481
|
Other net
(liabilities)/assets
|
|
(28,207)
|
100,828
|
EPRA net tangible assets
|
|
1,084,532
|
1,156,534
|
Fair value of interest rate
derivatives
|
|
31,449
|
57,583
|
Fair value adjustment for
financial assets held at amortised cost
|
|
3,493
|
3,609
|
IFRS net assets
|
|
1,119,474
|
1,217,726
|
EPRA net tangible assets ("EPRA NTA") is considered
to be the most relevant asset measure for the Group, and includes
both income and capital returns, but excludes the fair value of
interest rate derivatives and includes a revaluation to fair value
of investment properties held at amortised cost.
At 30 June 2024, EPRA NTA was £1,085 million (30
June 2023: £1,157 million), representing an EPRA NTA per share of
87 pence, a decrease of 6.3% since 30 June 2023 primarily due to
the portfolio revaluation deficit of £65.8 million or 5 pence per
share.
Portfolio
Valuation
The value of the portfolio at 30 June 2024,
including the fair value of investment properties held at amortised
cost, was £1,776 million (30 June 2023: £1,693 million). During the
Year, the Group invested £135.8 million in 20 omnichannel
supermarkets (excluding transaction costs). On a like-for-like
basis, the portfolio recognised a revaluation deficit of £53.8
million, or 3.2%, which reflects the outward shift in property
yields applied by valuers across the real estate sector as a result
of higher interest rates and the macroeconomic environment.
Cash Flow and Net
Debt
Cash flows from operating activities before changes
in working capital increased by £12.6 million to £89.6 million,
primarily due to increased rental income received from rent reviews
and property acquisitions.
During the year, the Group received £134.9 million
following the disposal of its interest in the Sainsbury's Reversion
Portfolio Joint Venture. Part of the proceeds were used to acquire
two omnichannel supermarkets with a combined acquisition cost of
£36.4 million (excluding transaction costs), providing earnings
growth in line with the Group's strategy, with the remaining
proceeds used to reduce drawn debt.
In the second half of the year, the Group drew down
£106.8 million from facilities with existing lenders, to fund the
acquisition of 18 supermarkets.
Net debt increased by £25.5 million over the year to
30 June 2024, to £655.5 million, and represents a loan to value of
37% (30 June 2023: 37%). The Group continues to maintain a
conservative leverage policy, with a medium-term target LTV of
30-40%.
Financing
|
|
30 June 2024
|
30 June 2023
|
Undrawn
facilities36
|
|
£104m
|
£190m
|
Loan to value
|
|
37%
|
37%
|
Net debt / EBITDA ratio
|
|
7.1x
|
7.9x
|
Weighted average cost of
debt37,38
|
|
3.8%
|
2.9%
|
Interest cover
|
|
6.2x
|
4.1x
|
Average debt
maturity39,42
|
|
4.0 years
|
3.7 years
|
% of drawn debt which is
fixed/hedged37
|
|
100%
|
100%
|
In the first half of the year, the Group completed a
comprehensive debt refinancing exercise, completing a new £67
million unsecured facility with Sumitomo Mitsui Banking
Corporation, at the same time reducing its HSBC facility from £150
million to £50 million and cancelling its Barclays/RBC facility of
£77.5 million.
In the second half of the year, the Group increased
its unsecured facility with Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation by
£37.5 million to £104.5 million, to facilitate the acquisition of a
Tesco omnichannel supermarket in Stoke-on-Trent.
In April 2024, the Group drew down €81.7 million
from its existing HSBC revolving credit facility, having also
increased the total size of the facility by £25 million. The funds
were used to acquire a portfolio of 17 supermarket stores from
Carrefour.
At 30 June 2024, the Group has gross borrowings of
£698 million diversified across eight lenders, including £415
million of unsecured borrowings and £283 million of secured
borrowings. In addition, the Group has available undrawn facilities
of £104 million (which includes a £50 million accordion) and plenty
of headroom under banking covenants, providing the capacity to
execute opportunistic transactions as they arise.
Post year end, the Group announced the completion of
a £170 million refinancing through its first private placement
issuance and a new unsecured bank facility.
As part of the refinancing, the Company completed an
agreement with a group of institutional investors for a private
placement of €83 million new senior unsecured notes, which have a
maturity of 7 years and a fixed rate coupon of 4.44%.
In addition, the Group also refinanced its existing
£97 million secured debt facility with Deka through a new £100
million unsecured debt facility with ING Bank N.V., London Branch.
The facility comprises a £75 million term loan and a £25 million
revolving credit facility, which has a maturity of three-years and
has two one-year extension options. Following the refinancing, the
Company has a weighted average debt maturity of 4 years, a weighted
average debt cost of 3.8% and available undrawn facilities of £176
million (including £50 million accordion).
The Group's interest rate risk is mitigated through
a combination of fixed debt and derivative interest rate swaps and
caps. During the year, the Group utilised the value of its existing
in-the-money interest rate hedges to extend the term of its hedging
arrangements by 12 months through terminating existing derivatives
and acquiring new instruments that aligned with the expiry of the
Group's debt portfolio. This exercise was performed at no
additional cost to the Company.
The Group maintains good long-term relationships
with all lenders and is currently in discussions regarding
refinancing requirements over the next financial year.
The Group continues to monitor its banking covenants
and maintains significant headroom on its LTV and ICR covenants. As
at 30 June 2024, property values would need to fall by around 38%
before breaching the unsecured gearing covenant. Similarly, net
rental income would need to fall by 72% before breaching the
unsecured interest cover covenant.
Fitch Ratings, as part of
its annual review, reaffirmed the Group's BBB+ rating with a stable
outlook.
TCFD COMPLIANT REPORT
Energy and Carbon
Foreword
The Company recognises the urgent need to address
climate change and is committed to supporting the required
transition to a net zero economy.
This year, the Company reached a significant milestone
with the Climate and Environment pillar of its Sustainability
Strategy, with the setting of a formalised 2050 net-zero commitment
and associated GHG emissions reduction targets. These targets were
approved by the SBTi in March 2024, and include a commitment by the
Company to reduce Scope 1 and 2 emissions 42% by 2030 and to reduce
Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions 90% by 2050 (from a FY23 base year).
The Company's Board and the Investment Adviser
recognise the importance of transparent, decision-useful
sustainability reporting to improve our accountability to
stakeholders. As such, the Company's SECR and TCFD Report can be
found below on pages 39 to 51. In addition, the Company has
published a standalone Sustainability Report covering its wider ESG
performance.
The Company remains committed to further progressing
its climate-related strategy and emissions reductions activities,
as it continues to identify opportunities to reduce operational
carbon and energy use and contribute towards a net zero future.
Streamlined Energy
and Carbon Reporting
The below table and supporting narrative summarise the
SECR disclosure. As a listed entity, Supermarket Income REIT plc is
required to comply with the SECR regulations under the Companies
(Directors' Report) and Limited Liability Partnerships (Energy and
Carbon Report) Regulations 2018. Data for the year 2022-2023 and
2023-2024 is included as this is the Company's second year of
SECR.
Compared to the previous reporting year (2022-2023),
there has been a slight increase in Scope 1 fuel consumption and a
decrease in Scope 2 purchased electricity consumption. Overall,
this has resulted in a decrease in total Scope 1 and 2 emissions
from 111 tCO2e in the previous reporting year to 103
tCO2e (7% reduction) in the current reporting year. Due
to this overall decrease in the Company's Scope 1 and 2 emissions,
emissions from Fuel and Energy related activities ("FERA") (Scope 3
category 3) have also decreased from 37 to 32 tCO2e (14%
reduction) for this reporting year.40 Emissions from
Purchased Goods and Services (Scope 3 category 1) have decreased
from 3,132 to 2,215 tCO2e (30% reduction) for this
reporting year, due to a decrease in total included spend as
exclusions were more rigorous this year. This year exclusions from
spend include service charge costs and costs that are recharged to
tenants in full. This is due to a spend-based approach being used
for the Scope 3 Purchased Goods and Services, which supports the
Company in prioritising its suppliers for engagement on
decarbonisation. This year no newly built properties have been
added to the portfolio; therefore, no emissions are attributed to
Capital Goods (Scope 3 category 2) this year.
Two new supermarket sites have been acquired by the
Company in this reporting year. Even with the two new sites
acquired, Scope 3 energy consumption and resultant emissions from
Downstream Leased Assets (Scope 3 category 13),
which includes tenant Scope 1 and 2 emissions, have decreased
from 83,794 to 81,931 tCO2e
(1% decrease) for this reporting year due to improved estimation
methods. Overall, total Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions have decreased
from 87,537 tCO2e in the
previous reporting year to 84,281 tCO2e (4% reduction) in the current reporting year.
An error in the supermarket refrigerant emission
calculation was found for the previous reporting year (2022-2023),
resulting in missing Scope 3 downstream leased asset emissions
reported last year. This has now been rectified and restated
figures are included in the table below. The correction has
resulted in an 8% increase in total emissions for the reporting
year 2022-2023. In April 2024, the Company acquired a portfolio of
Carrefour omnichannel supermarkets in France through a sale and
leaseback transaction. Given the timing of this transaction, full
year energy and carbon data has not yet been collected for these
French assets. Therefore, the disclosures in this SECR Report focus
on the energy and carbon performance of the Company's UK portfolio
only. However, the Company intends to collect the required energy
and carbon performance data from these French assets over the next
reporting period to ensure the Company's next SECR Report covers
both UK and French assets.
Report
|
Previous reporting year:
1st July 2022 -
30th June 2023
|
As restated: 1st July 2022 - 30th June
2023
|
Current reporting year:
1st July 2023 -
30th June 2024
|
Location
|
UK
|
UK
|
UK
|
Emissions from the
combustion of fuel and operation of facilities (tCO2e)
(Scope 1)
|
10
|
10
|
11
|
Emissions from purchase of
electricity (location-based) (tCO2e) (Scope
2)
|
101
|
101
|
92
|
Emissions from business
travel in rental cars or employee-owned vehicles where company is
responsible for purchasing the fuel (tCO2e) (Scope
3)41
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Total mandatory emissions
(tCO2e)42
|
111
|
111
|
103
|
Voluntary: Emissions from
Fuel and Energy related activity (location-based)
(tCO2e) (Scope 3)
|
37
|
37
|
32
|
Voluntary: Emissions from
Purchased Goods and Services (tCO2e) (Scope
3)
|
3,132
|
3,132
|
2,215
|
Voluntary: Emissions from
Capital Goods (tCO2e) (Scope 3)
|
463
|
463
|
N/A
|
Voluntary: Emissions from
Downstream Leased Assets (tCO2e) (Scope
3)43
|
77,274
|
83,794
|
81,931
|
Total gross emissions
(tCO2e)44
|
81,017
|
87,537
|
84,281
|
Energy consumption used to
calculate Scope 1 emissions (kWh)
|
606,629
|
52,726
|
56,568
|
Energy consumption used to
calculate Scope 2 emissions (kWh)
|
521,321
|
521,321
|
443,555
|
Energy consumption used to
calculate Scope 3 emissions (kWh)45
|
186,704,059
|
187,756,005
|
174,876,336
|
Total energy consumption
(kWh)
|
187,832,009
|
188,330,052
|
175,376,459
|
Intensity ratio:
tCO2e (gross Scope 1 + 2) per m2 of floor
area46
|
0.00045
|
0.00045
|
0.00037
|
Intensity ratio:
tCO2e (gross Scope 1, 2 + 3) per m2 of floor
area47
|
0.14
|
0.14
|
0.10
|
Methodology
The 2023/24 footprint within the scope of SECR
reporting is equivalent to 84,281 tCO2e, including
voluntary emissions, with the largest portion being made up of
emissions from downstream leased assets at 81,931
tCO2e.
Anthesis has calculated the above GHG emissions to
cover all material sources of emissions for which the Company is
responsible. The methodology used was that of the GHG Protocol: A
Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (revised edition,
2015). Responsibility for emissions sources was determined using
the operational control approach. All emissions sources required
under The Companies (Directors' Report) and Limited Liability
Partnerships (Energy and Carbon Report) Regulations 2018 are
included.
Raw data captured in spreadsheets including energy
spend and consumption data has been collected by the Company. Where
actual consumption data was available for natural gas and
electricity use, this was used. To address data gaps, the most
appropriate proxy was applied by using either previous year's data,
actual data to calculate average monthly consumption, or by
applying the average floor area intensity from sites with actual
data. Fuel oil was estimated by applying the average 2023 UK fuel
oil price to the budgeted spend for fuel oil. Energy was then
converted to GHG emissions using the UK Government's GHG Conversion
Factors for Company Reporting 2023. Scope 3 emissions have been
calculated for relevant material categories using consumption data,
spend data, floor area and EPC data. Fuel and Energy related
activities includes well-to-tank ("WTT") and transmission and
distribution ("T&D") upstream emissions from Scope 1&2. For
Purchased Goods and Services, Environmentally Extended Input Output
("EEIO") has been used. Spend data was provided per supplier and
mapped to 2023 DEFRA Input/Output ("IO") categories. No newly built
sites were acquired during this reporting year, therefore there
were no Capital Goods this year. Where actual data was not
available for Downstream Leased Assets, a combination of CIBSE
benchmarks were used against EPC data on energy use and heating
type. Publicly available air conditioning ("AC") certificates were
used to determine the type and amount of refrigerants. Where this
was not available, other similar sites were used as proxies. As per
EPA data, the size of the air conditioning equipment used was
dependent on the amount of refrigerant used and the floor area.
Supermarket refrigeration and non-food air conditioning was
estimated using an intensity estimate from EPA data as no activity
data was available. Refrigerant loss rate for refrigeration was
taken from Direct Emissions from Use of Refrigeration, Air
Conditioning Equipment and Heat Pumps from DEFRA.
The Company continued its efforts to improve energy
efficiency across landlord-controlled areas and to support
tenant-led energy efficiency measures between 1 July 2023 and 30
June 2024. A number of sites have been identified for LED lighting
upgrades across car park and communal areas which will have a
positive impact on the Company's Scope 2 emissions. Tenant-led
investments in store upgrades have also focused on energy
efficiency and resulted in EPC rating improvements, as discussed in
the Sainsbury's Cheltenham case study above.
Approach to GHG
emissions restatements
To improve its GHG reporting, the Company may restate
previously reported data to provide a more accurate representation
of previous performance and its decarbonisation journey, should a
significant change or error be identified, such as:
· Significant
changes in company structure and activities
· Methodology changes
such as improvements in emissions factors, data access and
calculation methodologies
· Discovery of
significant error(s) in previously reported data
The Company will restate the baseline used for its
Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions reductions targets if any of the changes
above result in a change of 5% or more, in line with the
requirements of the SBTi. The Company will review the impact of the
Carrefour portfolio acquisition on its SBT baseline once full year
energy and carbon data is collected for these French assets.
Taskforce on
Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)
Introduction
The following report contains the Company's voluntary
climate-related financial disclosures for the reporting period 1
July 2023 - 30 June 2024 in relation to governance, strategy, risk
management and metrics and targets. It addresses all four core
elements and 11 Recommended Disclosures as detailed in
"Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial
Disclosures".48
Governance
Describe how the
board exercises oversight of climate-related risks and
opportunities:
The Board is responsible for setting the Company's
sustainability strategy and overseeing the Company's approach to
climate-related risks and opportunities affecting the business.
Both the Board and JTC Global AIFM Solutions Limited,
the Company's Alternative Investment Fund Manager (the "AIFM"), are
responsible for the investment decisions of the Company and
directing the delivery of services by the Investment Adviser to
ensure that climate-related priorities are incorporated into the
execution of the investment strategy. In support of this objective,
the Board established its ESG Committee in May 2022, whose role
helps to ensure that sustainability issues, including climate
change, are discussed in sufficient detail and given appropriate
focus at the Board level. The ESG Committee, which is Chaired by
Frances Davies and attended by all of the Company's Directors,
meets at least four times a year and has responsibility for
overseeing the delivery of the Company's Sustainability Strategy,
including identification and management of climate-related risks.
The Board is primarily informed of climate-related issues by the
Investment Adviser through the meetings of the ESG Committee. The
Board also considers climate-related issues when making decisions
on acquisitions and this process is described below under the
managing climate-related risks section of this report. See Figure 1
for an overview of the Company's governance structure related to
climate-related risks and opportunities.
Figure 1 |
Governance structure related to climate-related risks and
opportunities
The Board reviewed and approved a refreshed
Sustainability Strategy for the Company in March 2024, of which
"Climate and Environment" is one of three key pillars. The ESG
Committee receives a report and verbal update from the Investment
Adviser at every quarterly meeting in relation to this aspect of
the strategy, and the other two pillars (namely, Tenant and
Community Engagement and Responsible Business). The ESG Committee
update includes the Company's quarterly performance against
environmental measures outlined in the Company's last
TCFD Report (reporting period 1 July 2022 to 30 June
2023). The update also covers the broader delivery of the Company's
sustainability strategy, including activities such as the roll-out
of rooftop solar photovoltaic ("PV") and EV charging, improvement
of Energy Performance Certificate ("EPC") ratings, ESG-related
investor engagement and climate transition planning. These updates
allow the ESG Committee to oversee the Investment Adviser's
performance against the agreed deliverables under the
sustainability strategy, as well as holding it to account for
non-performance. In addition, at the annual Board strategy day
event, sustainability strategy is included as a core agenda item.
The ESG Committee is also involved in the review process and
ultimate approval of the Company's TCFD Report. The Investment
Adviser's Managing Director, ESG, is responsible for leading the
delivery of these services to the ESG Committee on behalf of the
Investment Adviser.
The Board is committed to ongoing improvement of the
Company's climate-related disclosures. During the reporting year,
sustainability consultancy Anthesis was again engaged to provide
external support to help shape the Company's response and alignment
to the TCFD recommendations. As part of this support, Anthesis
conducted an independent peer review. In addition, they provided
analysis of and recommendations on the Company's final disclosures
to further advance its progress against best practice approaches
and identify focus areas for the Company to address in upcoming
disclosures. The Board is invested in enhancing the Company's
understanding of climate risks and opportunities and, as part of
this, approved budget allocation for ongoing climate-related
activities, for the next reporting year. This facilitates forward
planning and preparation of ESG matters targeted for the next
reporting year.
The Board recognises that appropriate training and
upskilling is a key enabler to ensure successful implementation of
the Company's sustainability strategy and, specifically, the
integration of sustainability factors into the investment process.
In 2023 and 2024, Climate Risk training was delivered to the
Investment Adviser and the Board respectively, to improve
understanding of climate-related risks and opportunities and their
tracking and oversight in order to support the management of these
issues in the Company's activities.
Describe management's
role in assessing and managing climate-related risks and
opportunities:
Investment Adviser
The Investment Adviser is responsible for the
day-to-day delivery of the sustainability strategy as approved by
the Board on behalf of the Company, including the assessment,
management and reporting of climate-related risks and
opportunities.
Steve Windsor, Principal and Sustainability Champion
at the Investment Adviser, is responsible for oversight, monitoring
and management of sustainability risks and opportunities including
those related to climate change. The Investment Adviser's Managing
Director, ESG, is responsible for the operational delivery of
climate-related risks and opportunities measures within the
Investment Adviser's operations and leads the provision of climate
risk advice to the Company.
The Investment Adviser's Managing Director, ESG, and
Fund Management team meet fortnightly to discuss ESG issues
impacting the Company, and climate risk is a standing agenda item
as part of these meetings. The Managing Director, ESG is also a
standing attendee at the Investment Adviser's Investment Committee,
assuming responsibility for implementation and alignment with the
Investment Adviser's sustainability systems and controls,
co-ordination of third-party service providers, and management of
the Company's sustainability activities including climate-related
reporting.
Where the Company has appointed a third-party service
provider, the Investment Adviser will require and hold regular
project progress meetings with the service provider, where delivery
is tracked against an agreed project timeline. The results of the
progress will be communicated to the ESG Committee by the
Investment Adviser in the context of its progress against the
agreed sustainability strategy. In order to formalise oversight of
the TCFD reporting process, the Investment Adviser plans to
formally establish a dedicated Climate Risk and TCFD Working Group
in the next reporting period. This Working Group will be led by the
Investment Adviser's Managing Director, ESG, and consist of members
of the wider Investment Adviser team, including from fund
management and finance, to ensure appropriate assignment of
climate-related responsibilities and monitoring of climate-related
issues.
Strategy
Describe the
climate-related risks and opportunities the organization has
identified over the short, medium, and long term.
In accordance with TCFD recommended disclosures, the
Company has identified climate-related risks and opportunities
across two key categories: (1) physical risks related to the physical
impacts of climate change (acute and chronic) and (2) transition risks related to the
transition to a low carbon economy (policy, legal, technology, and
market).
The Company considered these risks over three key time
periods: from now until 2030 (near-term), from 2030 to 2050
(medium-term) and 2050 to 2100 (long-term).
Time
Horizon
|
Details
|
Near-term (until
2030)
|
The near-term time horizon
(2024-2030) aligns to both the Company's near-term Science Based
Target (2030) and the anticipated compliance deadline for the
proposed Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards ("MEES") regulation.
The Investment Adviser anticipates 2030 as the target year for a
minimum B EPC ratings. Due to the 12 year
weighted average unexpired lease term ("WAULT") of its portfolio,
the Company expects that there will be a limited number of lease
renewals and few changes to its existing leases during this time
period.
|
Medium-term (from 2030 to
2050)
|
The medium-term time horizon (from
2030) aligns with a period of current lease renewals for the
majority of the Company's assets, during which physical and
transition risks associated with the Company's portfolio may have
greater influence on lease agreements with existing and new
tenants.
|
Long-term (2050 to
2100)
|
The long-term time horizon aligns
with both the Company's long-term / net-zero Science Based Target
and with a potential increase in the likelihood and severity of
physical climate risks impacting the Company's portfolio. This
allows for the creation of long-term strategies and planning
regarding portfolio management in response to these
risks.
|
The Company considered two key temperature scenarios
as part of its scenario analysis conducted this year:
Scenario
|
Details
|
1.5°C / REMIND / SSP2 /
Orderly ("1.5°C Net Zero")
|
Net Zero 2050 is an ambitious
scenario that limits global warming to 1.5 °C through stringent
climate policies and innovation, reaching net zero CO₂ emissions
around 2050.
|
3°C / REMIND / SSP2 / "3°C:
Current Policies"
|
Current Policies Scenario. No
additional climate policies are applied leading to significant
global warming (exceeding 3°C) with severe physical risks and
irreversible impacts like sea-level rise.
|
Further details on the hazard level model and data
sets used as part of the Company's scenario analysis is included in
the appendix of this TCFD Report.
The Company has utilised the
MSCI Real Assets (Real Estate) Climate Risk Tool (the
"MSCI tool") and associated Climate Value at Risk ("Climate VaR")
outputs to quantify the physical risks across the post-2050
(long-term) time horizon.49 The outputs provide a
qualitative risk assessment using set Financial Risk Categories
determined based on the asset's Climate VaR. For each hazard and
for the transition risk, the Climate VaR is classified into one of
seven buckets as shown in Figure 2 below50:
Figure 2 | Financial
Risk Category
The Company recognises the MSCI tool is only one of
many different scenario analysis tools currently available on the
market. In addition, such tools and the underlying data models and
inputs they utilise are constantly evolving as climate research and
available data sets continue to advance. Therefore, the Company has
adopted this method of scenario analysis as an efficient way to
review its portfolio, but any findings will require further
investigation to establish their accuracy. The Company's plans in
this respect are outlined in more detail under the 3°C (Current
Policies) temperature scenario results shared below on page 45. The
Company also intends to collaborate with MSCI, and other data
providers that may be used in future, to provide feedback on the
tools and data inputs and to challenge assumptions and outputs when
necessary.
In FY23 the sustainability consultancy, Anthesis, was
engaged to conduct a preliminary climate risk assessment and
qualitative scenario analysis as part of preparing the Company's
2023 TCFD Report. During this assessment, the following risks were
considered as potentially most material to the Company determined
based on their relative likelihood and potential financial
impact:
1. Physical
Risk:
a. Flooding
(Acute & Chronic): Increased insurance premiums and increased
capital expenditure required on adaptative or remediation
measures.
b. Extreme
Heat (Acute): Increasing operating costs for tenants through
increased energy demand required for cooling; supply chain
disruption, stock damage and write off. This may increase capital
expenditure, repairs and maintenance, and reduced tenant demand
and/or rent premiums for less energy efficient buildings.
2. Transition
Risk
a. Policy and
Legal Risk: Currently represented by the proposed MEES regulation,
but could include new or additional regulations. Any properties not
compliant with MEES could reduce tenant demand, reduce rent
premiums or result in fines.
b. Market:
Energy costs may increase for tenants, shifting preferences for
more energy efficient buildings and renewables.
c.
Reputation: Tenants demand preferences may shift to lower carbon,
highly energy efficient buildings, due to Net Zero commitments and
their customer demands, reducing tenant demand and/or rent
premiums.
This initial analysis has been expanded on in this
reporting year with further qualitative and quantitative analysis
undertaken over three potential risks, namely:
·
Physical risk of flooding (both coastal and
pluvial);
·
Extreme heat; and
·
Transition risks related to MEES, as discussed
in the Strategy section above
These risks were selected due to their potential
impact over different time horizons, with the proposed MEES
regulations identified as a key near-term risk and flooding and
extreme heat identified as potential longer-term risks, allowing a
broader assessment of the Company's strategic response and
resilience. The Company will look to further explore market and
reputation related transition risks (both longer term transition
risks) in the next reporting period.
In FY23, the Company also identified the following
climate-related opportunity:
1.
Climate-related opportunities:
a. Market: By
accelerating deployment of energy efficient measures, setting a
Science Based Target ("SBT") and better aligning with tenant
preferences, the Company could gain a competitive advantage
relative to other commercial landlords who are not as progressive
on in their climate and sustainability related ambitions. This
could enable increased tenant demand and rent premiums.
During the reporting period, the Company has acted
on both the opportunity to set a SBT and continued deployment of
energy efficient measures - including progressing roll out of
rooftop solar PV and installation of EV across the portfolio. These
measures and the Company's targets in relation to climate-related
opportunities are discussed in more detail under the Metrics and
Targets section of this report, in Tables B and E.
As identified above, a key progress milestone in the
maturity of the Company's climate risk processes achieved in this
reporting period is the adoption of the MSCI tool. The Company has
used this tool to assist with quantitative scenario analysis and an
assessment of the portfolio's exposure to climate-related physical
risks and associated value at risk. The Physical Risk model
integrated within the MSCI tool assesses the cost of physical risks
on buildings, using climate data for the given locations of assets
incorporating the hazards of extreme heat, extreme cold, fluvial
and coastal flooding, tropical cyclones and wildfire (see Figure
3). A summary of the key climate data sets integrated into the MSCI
Physical Risk model is included in the appendix of this TCFD
Report.
Figure 3 |
Physical Risk Hazards:
In addition to other result outputs considered, the
MSCI tool was also used to conduct a physical risk assessment,
identifying the percentage of the Company's assets at above
negligible risk51. The assessment was undertaken against
the two key physical risks that were qualitatively analysed in the
Company's 2023 TCFD analysis, namely flood risk and extreme
heat.
This is the first stage in the Company's project to
develop plans to mitigate any material climate risks at an asset
level.
The outputs of this assessment under the high
emissions 3°C (Current Policies)
temperature scenario (aggressive outcome)52
highlighted the following results for the
portfolio53:
·
When considering both flood and extreme heat
independently, the majority of the Company's portfolio properties
are exposed to negligible (>0 to 0.5% VaR) or no identifiable
risk. The same can be said when considering aggregate physical risk
overall.
·
In terms of coastal flood risk, 89% of the
portfolio properties has either no identifiable or negligible
exposure to coastal flooding risk.
·
In terms of fluvial flood risk, 83% of the
portfolio properties has either no identifiable or negligible
exposure to fluvial flooding risk.
·
In terms of extreme heat risk, the results
showed that no assets in the portfolio face more than negligible
exposure to extreme heat under this scenario. Therefore,
highlighting flood risk rather than extreme heat as a priority for
further analysis. This is in line with the benchmark of MSCI UK
Quarterly Supermarket Index which also identifies extreme heat as a
negligible risk under this scenario.
These risks reduce under an Average Outcome 3°C (Current Policies)
temperature scenario, and further reduce under a
1.5°C (Orderly) temperature
scenario (under both an Aggressive and Average Outcome).
Over the next reporting cycle, the Company will
undertake the next phase of its risk mitigation project and look to
conduct further analysis over the outputs from this assessment.
This will involve specific review into the assets identified from
this assessment as being at above negligible exposure to flooding,
including:
·
Further investigation into the results through
review of any historic flood or extreme heat events;
·
Comparison against UK GOV flood risk scores and
other publicly available research; and
·
Review of any existing tenant or local
government adaptation plans.
Through this ongoing work, the Company will aim to
validate the results and to determine an appropriate strategic
response and any planning required to address any identified risks,
for example, the development of site-specific flood management
plans or engagement of further environmental surveys.
While the outputs from the MSCI tool in terms of heat
risk showed that this risk is financially immaterial at a direct
asset level, the Company recognises that extreme heat still poses a
potential indirect risk to the Company through the potential impact
on its tenants and their supply chains.
In terms of transition risk, policy and legal risk
related to the proposed MEES regulation was chosen as the key risk
for the Company's transition risk analysis. Over the next reporting
period, the Company intends to conduct a high-level assessment of
the cost to retrofit our current portfolio to achieve compliance
with the proposed MEES regulations in lieu of expected tenant-led
investment. The Company also has a project underway to develop its
first Transition Plan which will further outline the Company's
actions and resources associated with its transition to net zero
and actions to reduce the Company's GHG emissions in line with its
science-based emissions reductions targets.
Going forward, the Company intends to take an
iterative approach to scenario analysis as a strategic planning
tool over time, as external tools and analytical choices evolve and
the Company's analysis further matures.
Describe the impact
of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organization's
businesses, strategy, and financial planning.
The Company has identified two material risks, one per
transition and physical, from the outputs of the scenario analysis
conducted over this reporting period. The impact of each risk is
likely to vary in magnitude across different time horizons and
climate scenarios (as listed in Table A), and so the Company will
continue to monitor and analyse these risks to better understand
how they may unfold.
Table A below provides a description of each risk and
the Company's assessment of potential impact and risk management
strategy (including mitigating actions).
Table
A | Climate-related risks summary
TCFD Risk
Category
|
Risk
Description
|
Time
Horizon
|
Potential Impact and
Strategy (including mitigating actions)
|
Transition Risk: Policy and
Legal
|
Proposed
MEES regulation requiring portfolio assets to achieve a minimum of
EPC B rating by 2030.
|
Near-term (from now until
2030)
|
1.5°C
scenario (Net Zero): higher
risk
3°C
(Current Policies) scenario: lower risk
The proposed MEES regulation is
expected to require all commercial property to be a minimum EPC B
by 2030. 56% of the Company's portfolio is currently rated B or
above.
This risk (and other policy and
legal risks) is higher under a 1.5°C scenario which assumes the
implementation of stringent climate policies required to reach net
zero.
The direct impact of the proposed
regulation is reduced given the Full Repairing and Insuring ("FRI")
nature of the leases54, and the ambitious emissions
reduction and associated energy efficiency targets of the Company's
major tenants. 75% of the UK portfolio is leased to Tesco and
Sainsbury's, with both these tenants having set net zero by 2050
science-based targets, supported by commitments to retrofit their
stores to improve energy efficiency over the near and medium-term.
This tenant-led investment in energy efficiency measures (including
upgrades to heating and cooling systems and refrigeration units)
not reduces energy consumption but has also led to EPC rating
improvements at no cost to the Company.
In addition, SUPR has introduced a
policy under which no asset with an EPC below C can be acquired
unless a demonstrable EPC improvement plan is developed, the cost
of which is reflected in the investment case for the asset
acquisition. Opportunities for the installation of energy
efficiency and renewable technology in support of the Net Zero
transition (such as rooftop solar PV and EV charging) are also
considered as part of the investment case.
|
Physical Risk:
Flooding
|
Impact of
acute physical risk of fluvial and coastal flooding.
|
Long-term
(2050 to 2100)
|
1.5°C
scenario (Net Zero): lower
risk
3°C
(Current Policies) scenario: higher risk
The key potential impact of
fluvial and coastal flooding is asset damage (building damage
costs). This risk is higher under a 3°C scenario which assumes no
additional climate policies are applied leading to significant
global warming (exceeding 3°C) with severe physical risks including
from sea-level rise, intense rainfall and associated
flooding.
The direct impact of flooding risk
on the Company is reduced given the majority of the assets are on
FRI leases, meaning the tenants have full insurance
obligations.
Flood risk is a key risk assessed
as part of the Company's acquisition due diligence process. The
Company has expanded upon its assessment of flood risk from initial
UK Government online Flood Risk tool assessments to also utilise
the flood risk assessment within the MSCI tool. If flood risk is
identified in an acquisition opportunity further due diligence will
be undertaken, for example additional site surveys and analysis,
and consideration of any adaptation measures.
The Company has identified the
assets exposed to above negligible risk of flooding under different
scenarios. The Company will explore how further changes to its
strategy and financial planning may be required in light of this
information, over the next reporting period. The Company's focus on
investing in strong performing stores and the long-dated nature of
the Company's leases already creates an incentive for the Company's
tenants to build physical climate-resilience considerations into
their own long-term management strategies for the stores they
occupy. As the Company continues to enhance its climate-related
engagement with tenants, it will also look to engage further on
adaptation planning and tenants' plans in this respect.
|
Describe the
resilience of the organisation's strategy, taking into
consideration different climate-related scenarios, including a 2°C
or lower scenario.
The Company's scenario analysis outputs have
highlighted the following findings:
·
Overall, the current portfolio is not highly
exposed to physical risks given the location of the assets.
·
Of the physical risks assessed, flood risk is
the most material risk for the portfolio.
·
The impact of climate-related physical risks to
the portfolio is expected to become more relevant in the long term
under a high emissions scenario.
·
Transitional risks are expected to be higher in
the short term under a 1.5°C scenario driven by policy and legal
changes, such as minimum EPC rating requirements, whereas under a
3°C scenario transition risks remain low over the short to
medium-term until the point whereby policy and legal changes
(particularly adaptation measures) are required to address
increasing physical impacts.
The Company recognises that its strategy and
financial planning regarding climate related risks and
opportunities, will need to continue to evolve over the long term,
particularly under a high emissions climate scenario. However, a
benefit of owning mission critical real estate is that the
Company's tenants make significant investments in maintaining,
upgrading and decarbonising the Company's store estate. These
investments are linked to the ambitious net zero targets and
associated energy efficiency commitments of the Company's largest
tenants. Not only do these investments drive improvements in energy
consumption at the store level, they have also helped the Company
to see an improvement in EPC ratings, supporting the Company with
progress against its EPC-related improvement targets. In addition
to acting as a transition risk mitigant, these decarbonisation
investments and the long-dated nature of the Company's leases also
create an incentive for the Company's tenants to build physical
climate-resilience considerations into their own long-term
management strategies for the stores they occupy.
During the reporting period, the Company has
undertaken a range of initiatives aimed at enhancing its resilience
to climate-related risks and capitalising on climate-related
opportunities. This includes an ESG data sharing initiative,
focused on gaining a better understanding of the energy consumption
performance of the Company's tenants. For the first time, as
outlined above, the Company has also conducted quantitative climate
scenario analysis as part of the Company's efforts to better
understand and manage the portfolio's exposure to climate-related
risks and opportunities.
A key climate-related milestone for the Company has
been the development of science-based emissions reduction targets.
These targets were approved and validated by the SBTi at the
beginning of 2024, they include a commitment to reduce our Scope 1
and 2 emissions by 42% by 2030 and to reduce Scope 1, 2 and 3
emissions 90% by 2050 (from a FY23 baseline). More details on the
Company's SBTs are provided under the Metrics & Targets section
of this report on page 48. As part of the development of the
targets, the Company engaged external consultants, Anthesis, to
prepare a high-level decarbonisation plan. The Company is currently
building upon this initial plan through the development of its
first Transition Plan. During the reporting period, the Company
continued to seek out other opportunities to enhance the
environmental performance of its assets and contribute to the net
zero transition. This includes the continued roll out of EV
charging and rooftop solar across the portfolio and the Company's
efforts to encourage energy efficiency improvements by its
tenants.
Risk
Management
Describe the organisation's processes for
identifying and assessing climate-related risks.
The Company's approach to risk assessment is as set
out in the Our Principal Risks Section on pages 52 to 54.
The Board and the AIFM together have joint overall
responsibility for the Company's risk management and internal
controls, with the Audit and Risk Committee reviewing the
effectiveness of the Board's risk management processes on its
behalf. The ESG Committee is responsible under the delegated
authority of the Board for the identification and monitoring of
climate-related risks which are incorporated into the risk
management process.
The ESG Committee considers both physical and
transition climate-related risks, including existing and emerging
regulatory requirements related to climate change.
The climate-related risks included in SUPR's Risk
Register have since been updated to reflect the findings from this
climate risk assessment.
Climate risk is also a standing agenda item at the
fortnightly ESG meetings held between the Investment Adviser's
Managing Director, ESG, and its Fund Management team. Additionally,
the Investment Adviser seeks to ensure climate-related issues are a
standing item when engaging with the Company's tenants. This
includes discussion on topics such as any planned tenant-led
investments in store refurbishments and energy efficiency upgrades,
energy consumption data sharing and improvements to EPC ratings.
Such engagement occurs multiple times per year and more frequently
with larger site tenants.
Describe the organisation's processes for
managing climate-related risks.
As part of the acquisition due diligence process, the
Investment Adviser undertakes an assessment of each asset against a
set of sustainability criteria. This includes consideration of
climate-related risk, such as flood risk (using both the UK
Government online Flood Risk tool and the MSCI tool) and assessing
the emissions reduction targets of tenants to assess alignment with
SUPR's own targets, as part of each transition review. The Company
also obtains external environmental surveys on all acquisitions,
which address the short-term risk of climate related damage to
group properties. A summary of the climate-related risk assessments
undertaken is included as part of each Investment Committee
paper.
The Company will not recommend the acquisition of
assets with an EPC of below a C unless a deliverable EPC
improvement plan is prepared to improve an asset to an EPC rating
of C or better. The cost of delivering the EPC Improvement plan
forms part of the acquisition investment case. EPC rating
assessments for existing assets in the portfolio are conducted on a
rolling basis when there are known sustainable improvements to
assets, on expiry or following a change to EPC calculation
methodology. These ratings, as the Company's responsibility, are
undertaken by the Company's consultants when required.
Both physical and transition climate risks associated
with the Company's portfolio are assessed and included in the risk
register. Materiality and prioritisation determinations are made
through impact, likelihood, and risk scoring as a part of the risk
register. Inherent and residual probabilities are assigned to each
risk, from which a risk score is derived. Mitigating actions are
described in detail in the risk register, laying out governance
structure and processes in place aimed at mitigating each risk.
Finally, actions taken to mitigate risks are tracked and recorded
in the register.
Describe how processes for identifying,
assessing, and managing climate-related risks are integrated into
the organization's overall risk management.
The Company's approach to risk assessment is as set
out in the Our Principal Risks Section on pages 52 to 54.
The Company manages its risk related to its emissions,
and associated regulatory risk, by monitoring, measuring, and
disclosing its Scope 1, 2, and 3 GHG emissions, and identifying
available decarbonisation levers. This includes the preparation of
the Company's first Transition Plan, currently under development,
which builds off the decarbonisation analysis completed to prepare
the Company's SBTs.
Tenant engagement is a core pillar of the Company's
Sustainability Strategy and includes engagement on energy
efficiency measures and support of tenants' own decarbonisation
efforts and targets. As part of Scope 3 emissions initiatives over
the last reporting period the Company has undertaken increased
engagement efforts with tenants on energy consumption and other ESG
performance data.
Should there be an incidence of flood, it is
anticipated that a flooding report would be submitted by the
tenants to the Investment Adviser. These can be consulted to inform
the Company's risk and investment strategy.
Metrics and
Targets
Disclose the metrics
used by the organization to assess climate-related risks and
opportunities in line with its strategy and risk management
process.
To better understand and manage its climate-related
risks and opportunities in line with its strategy and risk
management process, the Company measures a number of
climate-related metrics, see Table B below.
Table B |
Climate-related metrics
Metric
category
|
Metric
|
FY23
|
FY24
|
Transition
risks
|
% EPCs of UK supermarkets B or
above (by valuations)
|
50%55
|
56%
|
% EPCs of UK ancillary units B or
above (by valuations)
|
35%55
|
53%
|
% of actual energy consumption
data from UK supermarket tenants used for GHG Inventory (vs
estimated data)
|
14%
|
26%56
|
Physical
risks
|
% of UK supermarket assets in the
portfolio screened for physical climate hazards
|
Screening
only at acquisition
|
95%57
|
Climate-related
opportunities
|
% of UK supermarket assets with
on-site renewable energy generation
|
20%55
|
20%
|
% of UK supermarket assets with
on-site EV charging
|
20%
|
30%
|
The Company has set ambitious climate-related targets,
including both near-term and long-term/net zero emissions reduction
targets. The Company is committed to ongoing reporting of progress
against these targets as a means of transparency and
accountability. A summary of the Company's science based targets
and other core climate-related targets is provided in Table D and
E.
Disclose Scope 1,
Scope 2, and, if appropriate, Scope 3 GHG emissions, and the
related risks.
The Company engaged external consultants, Anthesis,
to prepare its GHG inventory for FY24, covering Scope 1, 2 and 3
emissions. The Company's full GHG inventory, prepared in line with
the GHG Protocol methodology is disclosed below in Table
C (see Appendix A
for further details of the methodology).
Table C | GHG Inventory58
|
FY23 (as
restated)59
|
FY24
|
Location-based
tCO2e
|
Location-based
tCO2e
|
Market-based
tCO2e
|
Market-based (S1&2 &
DLA) tCO2e
|
Scope 1
Total
|
10.49
|
11.46
|
11.46
|
11.46
|
Scope 2
Total
|
100.81
|
91.87
|
162.38
|
162.38
|
1:
Purchased Goods and Services
|
3,131.50
|
2,214.70
|
2,214.70
|
2,214.70
|
2:
Capital Goods
|
463.49
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3: Fuel-
and Energy-Related Activities
|
37.46
|
32.15
|
45.16
|
45.16
|
13:
Downstream Leased Assets ("DLA")
|
72,902.93
|
72,030.53
|
72,030.53
|
67,008.85
|
Scope 3
Total
|
76,535.38
|
74,277.38
|
74,290.39
|
69,268.71
|
Scope 1,2,3
Total
|
76,646.68
|
74,380.71
|
74,464.23
|
69,442.55
|
Intensity
ratio: tCO2e (gross Scope 1 & 2) per m2
of floor area
|
0.00047
|
0.00037
|
0.00062
|
0.00062
|
Intensity
ratio: tCO2e (gross Scope 1, 2 & 3) per
m2 of floor area
|
0.09201
|
0.08345
|
0.08355
|
0.07791
|
The Company's scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions total 74,381
tCO2e (location-based) in its FY24 reporting year.
Scope 3 accounts for the vast majority of the Company's emissions
at more than 99%, totalling 74,277 tCO2e
(location-based). This is to be expected as the Company's scope 1
and 2 emissions from the communal spaces of its assets is
relatively immaterial, producing 103 tCO2e
(location-based) collectively. The majority of the Company's
emissions come from their leased properties which sit under scope
3, category 13 downstream leased assets.
The GHG Inventory figures have removed FERA emissions
that are categorised under Scope 3 category 13: Downstream Leased
Assets ("DLA") to align with the SBTi minimum boundary alignment.
These FERA emissions are associated with the tenants Scope 1 and 2
emissions that are also categorised under Scope 3 DLA. The figures
reported in SECR Report above account for a fuller view of DLA
emissions by including FERA emissions under Scope 3 DLA. Therefore,
Scope 3 DLA and consequentially, total Scope 3 figures reported in
the SECR Report are higher than figures reported for TCFD due to
the exclusion of Scope 3 FERA under DLA in TCFD.
[The Company engaged Grant Thornton UK LLP to
provide independent limited assurance over the Company's
location-based GHG emission data disclosed in the table above,
using the assurance standard ISAE 3000 (Revised) and ISAE 3410, for
the year ending 30 June 2024. Grant Thornton has issued an
unqualified opinion over the selected data and the full assurance
report is available on the Sustainability page of the Company's
website: Sustainability
- Supermarket Income REIT].
Improving the quantity of actual (vs. estimated)
energy consumption data, has been a priority for the Company over
the reporting period. As a result, the amount of estimated data has
reduced, from 84% estimated in FY23 to 71% estimated data for this
reporting period. The majority of the Company's emissions from
downstream leased assets come from assets leased out to
supermarkets. Therefore, the Company has prioritised engagement on
data sharing with its supermarket tenants. As a result of these
engagement efforts with supermarket tenants specifically the
following improvements have been made:
·
The amount of actual purchased electricity data
in FY23 was 23%, improving to 52% actual data in FY24;
·
The amount of actual natural gas consumption
data in FY23 was 27%, improving to 70% actual data in FY24.
This has subsequently improved the overall accuracy
of the Company's emissions disclosures on prior year. This is a
marked improvement from FY22 where 100% of emissions were
estimated. This was achieved through a combination of measures
including the development of new tenant data request template,
aligned to the reporting requirements of EPRA sBPR and the
Sustainability Accounting Standards Board ("SASB") real estate
standard. The Company has identified engagement with supermarket
tenants on refrigeration gas data, which is currently 100%
estimated, as a key priority over the next reporting year. Details
of the remaining assumptions and proxies used to complete the
Company's GHG inventory where actual data was not available, are
outlined in the Appendix
A.
During the reporting period, the Company worked with
external consultants, Anthesis, to prepare and submit science-based
emissions reductions targets to the SBTi, see Table D below. These
targets were validated and approved by the SBTi at the beginning of
2024.
Table
D | - Science Based Targets
Target
|
Description
|
Near-term
|
The Company commits to reduce
scope 1 and scope 2 emissions 42% by 2030 from a FY23
baseline.
|
Long-term
|
The Company commits to reduce
scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions 90% by 2050 from a FY23
baseline.
|
Net Zero
|
The Company commits to reach
net-zero by 2050.
|
Describe the targets
used by the organization to manage climate-related risks and
opportunities and performance against targets.
In addition to the Company's science-based targets,
a number of other climate-related targets are used by the Company
to manage climate-related risks and opportunities, see Table E
below. These targets have been developed to link to the transition
and physical risks identified as part of the Company's TCFD
reporting.
Table
E | - Climate-related targets linked
to metrics
Metric
category
|
Metric
|
Target
|
Transition
risks
|
% EPCs of
UK supermarkets B or above (by valuations)
|
All UK supermarkets60 B
or above by 2030
|
% EPCs of
UK ancillary units B or above (by valuations)
|
All UK ancillary
units61 B or above by 2030
|
%
of actual energy consumption data
from UK supermarket tenants used for GHG Inventory (vs estimated data)
|
YoY increase in % actual energy
consumption data from UK supermarket tenants used for GHG
Inventory
|
Physical
risks
|
% of UK
supermarket assets in the portfolio screened for physical climate
hazards
|
All
assets included in annual portfolio climate risk
analysis
|
Climate-related
opportunities
|
% of UK
supermarket assets with on-site renewable energy
generation
|
YoY
increase in % of supermarket assets with on-site renewable energy
generation
|
% of UK
supermarket assets with on-site EV charging
|
YoY
increase in % of supermarket assets with on-site EV
charging
|
Given the FRI nature of the majority of the
Company's lease arrangements and associated limitations to site
control, the Company has not yet set further specific targets with
regards to the percentage of on-site solar PV installed and on-site
EV charging. However, the Company is committed to increasing the
number of assets with both on-site solar PV installed and on-site
EV charging and continues to actively engage with tenants on such
opportunities and to support installations wherever feasible.
During the reporting year, the Company achieved the
following two climate-related targets that were included in its
FY23 TCFD Report:
Target
|
Metric
|
Status
|
100% of Investment Adviser staff receive training on climate
risks and opportunities by end of 2023
|
Percentage of staff
trained
|
100%. Target achieved.
|
Five sites with Company-owned and managed car parks with
electronic vehicle charging
|
Number of EV charging
stations
|
5 of 5. Target
achieved.
|
Additional climate-related training will continue be
rolled out on an ad-hoc basis to the Investment Adviser team and to
new joiners. Most recently, this has covered topics such as
quantitative scenario analysis and transition planning
fundamentals. The Company will review its selection of
climate-related metrics and targets over the next reporting period
to ensure that it continues to measure and manage its
climate-related risks and evolve its approach to meet best practice
guidance and stakeholder expectations.
Appendix A:
Methodology notes for GHG inventory
Methodology and
Assumptions
The 2022 Conversion Factors published by the UK
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero ("DESNZ") and
Department for Business, Energy, and Industrial Strategy ("BEIS")
was the main source used for emission factors. All relevant
categories have been included and any exclusions are described
below.
Scope 1 & 2
For electricity and natural gas, some actual
consumption data was provided for communal areas where energy
consumption is controlled by SUPR. Where there were gaps,
estimations were made using the data from previous year or floor
area intensities (based on similar sites within the portfolio) as
proxies. For fuel oil, spend was used as a proxy due to a lack of
activity data.
Scope 3 (1. Purchased Goods &
Services)
This category was estimated using spend as a proxy
and applying Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs
("DEFRA") input-output factors kgCO2/GBP) to expenditure.
Scope 3 (13. Downstream Leased Assets)
The majority of emissions relate to tenant energy
use, particularly for supermarket branches. Some supermarket
tenants, including Tesco, Sainsbury's and M&S provided actual
consumption data for electricity and heating. Where no consumption
data was available, estimations were made using benchmark intensity
data based on floor area. The majority of refrigerant consumption
was estimated for all sites.
A smaller amount of emissions arises from the
communal areas of sites where the Company owns the land but is not
responsible for paying for the energy. These emissions were
estimated using the floor area intensities of similar sites with
actual data.
MSCI Physical Risk Model Data
Inputs
Hazard Level Main
Models and Datasets:
Hazard
|
Type
|
Severity
|
Resolution
|
Main Models and Datasets
|
Extreme Cold
|
Chronic
|
Number of
days <0°C and <-10°C
|
56km v
42km
|
·
CMIP6 climate models:
GFDL-ESM4, IPSL-CM6A-LR, MPI-ESM1-2-HR, MRI-ESM2-0,
UKESM1-0-LL
·
Climate projections are
bias-adjusted
|
Extreme Heat
|
Chronic
|
Number of
days >30°C and >35°C
|
56km v
42km
|
Coastal Flooding
|
Acute
|
Inundation depth (metres)
Flood
distribution from 1yr to >10,000yr event
|
90m x
70m
|
·
Regional sea level rise
projections from Integrated Climate Data Center
·
Elevation data from Coastal
DEM (upgraded Digital Elevation Model - Climate Central /
NASA)
|
Fluvial Flooding
|
Acute
|
Inundation depth (metres)
Flood
distribution from 1yr to >10,000yr event
|
90m x
70m
|
·
Dailing fluvial flooding
timeseries provided by Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact
Research
·
Elevation data from Coastal
DEM from Climate Central which is complemented by data from
SRTM
|
Tropical Cyclones
|
Acute
|
Wind
speed (metres/second)
Cyclone
distribution from 1yr to >10,000yr event
|
11km x
9km
|
·
CLIMADA
·
International Best Track
Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTRaCS)
|
Wildfire
|
Acute
|
Fire
probability (% annual)
|
460m x
355m
|
·
4 components: fire weather,
fire ignition, fire spread and fire intensity
·
Fire weather & ignition:
Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index (FWI)
·
Fire spread: Global Land
Cover 2000 dataset; Elevation is derived from the GMTED2010
dataset
·
Fire intensity: Global Fire
Atlas
|
Principal Risks and Uncertainties
The Board and JTC Global AIFM Solutions Limited, the
Company's Alternative Investment Fund Manager (the "AIFM"),
together have joint overall responsibility for the Company's risk
management and internal controls, with the Audit and Risk Committee
reviewing the effectiveness of the Board's risk management process
on its behalf.
To ensure that risks are recognised and
appropriately managed, the Board has agreed a formal risk
management framework. This framework sets out the mechanisms
through which the Board identifies, evaluates and monitors its
principal risks and the effectiveness of the controls in place to
mitigate them.
The Board and the AIFM recognise that effective risk
management is key to the Group's success. Risk management ensures a
defined approach to decision making that seeks to decrease the
uncertainty surrounding anticipated outcomes, balanced against the
objective of creating value for shareholders.
The Board determines the level of risk it will
accept in achieving its business objectives and this has not
changed during the year. We have no appetite for risk in relation
to regulatory compliance or the health, safety and welfare of our
tenants, service providers and the wider community in which we
work. We continue to have a moderate appetite for risk in relation
to activities which drive revenues and increase financial returns
for our investors.
There are a number of potential risks and
uncertainties which could have a material impact on the Company's
performance over the forthcoming financial year and could cause
actual results to differ materially from expected and historical
results.
The risk management process includes the Board's
identification, consideration and assessment of those emerging
risks which may impact the Group.
Emerging risks are specifically covered in the risk
framework, with assessments made both during the regular risk
review and as potential significant risks arise. The assessment
includes input from the Investment Adviser and review of
information by the AIFM prior to consideration by the Audit and
Risk Committee.
During the year, the Audit and Risk Committee,
together with the AIFM and Investment Adviser, undertook a review
of the risk management reporting framework. As a result of this
exercise, the Board reviewed all risks and decided to rationalise
the principal risks from 17 risks, as set out in the 2023 Annual
Report, to 10 risks.
The matrix below illustrates our assessment of the
impact and the probability of the principal risks identified. The
rationale for the perceived increases and decreases in the risks
identified is contained in the commentary for each risk
category.
Key
|
|
1
|
There can be no guarantee
that the dividend will grow in line with inflation.
|
2
|
The lower-than-expected
performance of the property portfolio leading to a significant fall
in property valuations.
|
3
|
Shareholders may not be
able to realise their shares at a price above or the same as they
paid for the shares or at all.
|
4
|
The default of one or more
of our grocery tenants would reduce revenue and may affect our
ability to pay dividends.
|
5
|
Inflationary pressure on
the valuation of the portfolio.
|
6
|
Ability to source assets
may be affected by competition for investment properties in the
supermarket sector.
|
7
|
The Company is reliant on
the continuance of the Investment Adviser.
|
8
|
Impact of geopolitical
conflict / major events.
|
9
|
Changes in regulatory
policy could lead to our assets becoming unlettable.
|
10
|
We operate as a UK REIT and
have a tax-efficient corporate structure. Loss of REIT status could
have adverse tax consequences for UK shareholders.
|
Risk
|
Impact
|
Mitigation
|
Change in
Year
|
1. There can
be no guarantee that the dividend will grow in line with
inflation.
|
The Company has a stated
ambition to grow its dividend progressively and its prospectus
refers to providing investors with inflation protection.
Although the Company has
received 100% of rent demanded, has increased rents in line with
its contractual rent reviews and has one of the lowest EPRA cost
ratios in the sector, it has been unable to increase its earnings
and dividend in line with inflation.
This has been caused
primarily by the cap on rental uplifts in the majority of the
Company's leases and the increase in cost of debt due to higher
interest rates.
Increases in interest rates
result in higher cost of debt and lower earnings.
|
The Company has entered
into interest rate swaps and caps to manage its exposure to further
increases in interest rates.
Interest rates have started
to decline from their highs last year which, if continued, would be
supportive of earnings and dividend growth over the long term
beyond expiry of current interest rate hedges.
The Company is proactively
pursuing a number of measures to grow earnings, such as accretive
acquisitions and cost reductions.
|
|
2. The
lower-than-expected performance of the property portfolio leading
to a significant fall in property valuations.
|
An adverse change in our
property valuations may lead to a breach of our banking covenants.
Market conditions may also reduce the revenues we earn from our
property assets, which affect our ability to pay dividends to
shareholders. A severe fall in values may result in us selling
assets to repay our loan commitments, resulting in a fall in our
net asset value.
|
Our portfolio is 99.5% let
(100% of supermarket units are let) with long weighted unexpired
lease terms and let to institutional-grade tenants.
We own a portfolio of
handpicked, high-quality supermarkets which deliver low-risk and
growing income returns that are resilient through economic
cycles.
We manage our activities to
operate within our banking covenants and constantly monitor our
covenant headroom on loan to value and interest cover.
|
|
3.
Shareholders may not be able to realise their shares at a
price above or the same as they paid for the shares or at all.
|
The Company's ordinary
shares have continued to be traded at a discount to net tangible
assets ("NTA"). This is largely a function of supply and demand for
the ordinary shares in the market and cannot therefore be
controlled by the Board.
|
The Company may seek to
address any significant discount to NTA at which its ordinary
shares may be trading by purchasing its own ordinary shares in the
market on an ad-hoc basis.
Ordinary shares will be
repurchased only at prices below the prevailing NTA per Ordinary
share, which should have the effect of increasing the NTA per
Ordinary share for remaining shareholders.
Investors should note that
the repurchase of Ordinary shares is entirely at the discretion of
the Board and no expectation or reliance should be placed on such
discretion being exercised on any one or more occasions or as to
the proportion of Ordinary shares that may be repurchased.
|
|
4. The default
of one or more of our grocery tenants would reduce revenue and may
affect our ability to pay dividends.
|
Our focus on supermarket
property means we directly rely on the performance of supermarket
operators. Insolvencies could affect our revenues earned and
property valuations.
|
Our investment policy
requires the Group to derive at least 60% of its rental income from
a portfolio let to the largest four supermarket operators in the UK
by market share. Focusing our investments on assets let to tenants
with strong financial covenants and limiting exposure to smaller
operators in the sector decreases the probability of a tenant
default.
At 30 June 2024, 75% of
SUPR's income was from assets let to Tesco and Sainsbury's who are
deemed investment grade credit quality. The portfolio continues to
be geographically diversified with no individual tenant operating
within more than 10-15 minutes of one of the Group's assets in any
single geographical area.
Our investment strategy is
to acquire assets in strong trading grocery locations, which in
many cases have been supermarkets for between 30 and 50 years. Our
investment underwriting targets strong tenants with strong property
fundamentals (good location, large sites with low site cover) and
which should be attractive to other occupiers or have strong
alternative use value should the current occupier fail.
|
|
5.
Inflationary pressure on the valuation of the portfolio.
|
Continued high inflation
may cause rents to exceed market levels and result in the softening
of valuation yields. Where leases have capped rental uplifts, high
inflation may cause rent reviews to cap out at maximum values,
causing rental uplifts to fall behind inflation.
|
Inflation is monitored
closely by the Investment Adviser. The Group's portfolio rent
reviews include a mixture of fixed, upward only capped as well as
open market rent reviews, to hedge against a variety of
inflationary outcomes.
|
|
6. Ability to
source assets may be affected by competition for investment
properties in the supermarket sector.
|
The Company faces
competition from other property investors. Competitors may have
greater financial resources than the Company and a greater ability
to borrow funds to acquire properties.
The supermarket investment
market continues to be considered a safe asset class for investors
seeking long-term secure cash flows which is maintaining
competition for quality assets. This has led to increased demand
for supermarket assets without a comparable increase in supply,
which potentially increases prices and makes it more difficult to
deploy capital.
|
The investment Adviser has
extensive contacts in the sector and we often benefit from
off-market transactions. They also maintain close relationships
with a number of investors and agents in the sector, giving us the
best possible opportunity to secure future acquisitions for the
Group.
The Company has acquired
assets which are anchored by supermarket properties but which also
have ancillary retail on site, and these acquisitions allow the
Company to access quality supermarket assets whilst providing
additional asset management opportunities.
We are not exclusively
reliant on acquisitions to grow the portfolio. Our leases contain
upward-only rent review clauses, which mean we can generate
additional income and value from the current portfolio. We also
have the potential to add value through active asset management and
we are actively exploring opportunities for all our sites.
We maintain a disciplined
approach to appraising and acquiring assets, engaging in detailed
due diligence and do not engage in bidding wars which drive up
prices in excess of underwriting.
|
|
7. The Company
is reliant on the continuance of the Investment Adviser.
|
We rely on the Investment
Adviser's services and reputation to execute our investment
strategy. Our performance will depend to some extent on the
Investment Adviser's ability and the retention of its key
staff.
|
The interests of the
Company and the Investment Adviser are aligned due to (a) key staff
of the Investment Adviser having personal equity investments in the
Company and (b) any fees paid to the Investment Adviser in shares
of the Company are due to be held for a minimum period of 12
months. The Board can pay up to 25% of the Investment Adviser's fee
in shares of the Company.
The Management Engagement
Committee assesses the performance of the Investment Adviser and
ensures the Company maintains a positive working relationship.
The AIFM receives and
reviews regular reporting from the Investment Adviser and reports
to the Board on the Investment Adviser's performance. The AIFM also
reviews and makes recommendations to the Board on any investments
or significant asset management initiatives proposed by the
Investment Adviser.
|
|
8. Impact of
geopolitical conflict / major events.
|
Global, regional and
national events, such as terrorism, pandemics, and geopolitical
conflict could adversely impact the Company, and present challenges
to our tenants resulting in impairment of asset values and/or a
reduction in revenue.
|
Supermarket operators have
historically been able to successfully pass on inflationary
increases through price increases to the end consumer.
Whilst sales volumes may
fall in a recessionary environment, the nature of food means that
demand is relatively inelastic.
Our tenants have strong
balance sheets with robust and diversified supply chains. The
tenants are therefore well positioned to deal with any disruption
that may occur.
|
|
9. Changes in
regulatory policy could lead to our assets becoming unlettable.
|
Changes in regulations
(currently represented by Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards
(MEES)) could lead to the possibility of our assets becoming
unlettable. Any properties not compliant with MEES could attract
reduced tenant demand, reduced rental income and/or be subject to
fines.
|
The ESG committee stays
informed about changes in legislation by working closely with the
Investment Adviser and seeks input from specialist ESG experts
where necessary.
Proposed updates to MEES,
together with updates on businesses to develop Net Zero transition
plans are being closely monitored.
|
|
10. We operate as a
UK REIT and have a tax-efficient corporate structure, with
advantageous consequences for UK shareholders.
|
If the Company fails to
remain a REIT for UK tax purposes, our profits and gains will be
subject to UK corporation tax.
|
The Board takes direct
responsibility for ensuring we adhere to the UK REIT regime by
monitoring REIT compliance. The Board has also engaged third-party
tax advisers to help monitor REIT compliance requirements and the
AIFM monitors compliance by the Company with the REIT regime.
|
|
SECTION 172(1) STATEMENT
The Directors consider that
in conducting the business of the Company over the course of the
year ended 30 June 2024, they have acted to promote the long-term
success of the Company for the benefit of shareholders, whilst
having regard to the matters set out in section 172(1)(a-f) of the
Companies Act 2006 (the "Act").
Details of our key stakeholders and how the Board
engages with them can be found on pages 56 to 59. Further details
of the Board activities and principal decisions are set out on
pages 72 to 73 providing insight into how the Board makes decisions
and their link to strategy.
Other disclosures relating to our consideration of
the matters set out in s172(1)(a-f) of the Act have been noted as
follows:
s.172 Factor
|
Our approach
|
Relevant disclosures
|
A.
The likely consequences of any decision in the
long-term
|
The Board has regard to its
wider obligations under Section 172 of the Act. As such strategic
discussions involve careful considerations of the longer-term
consequences of any decisions and their implications on
shareholders and other stakeholders and the risk to the longer-term
success of the business. Any recommendation is supported by
detailed cash flow projections based on various scenarios, which
include: availability of funding; borrowing; as well as the wider
economic conditions and market performance.
|
Key decisions of the Board
during the year on page 73.
Our Key Stakeholder
Relationships on pages 56 to 59.
Board Activities during the
year on pages 72.
|
B.
The interests of the Company's
employees
|
The Group does not have any
employees as a result of its external management structure.
The Board's main working
relationship is with the Investment Adviser. Consequently, the
Directors have regard to the interests of the individuals who are
responsible for delivery of the investment advisory services to the
Company to the extent that they are able to do so.
|
Our Key Stakeholder
Relationships on pages 56 to 59.
Culture on page 69.
|
C.
The need to foster the Company's business
relationships with suppliers, customers and others
|
The Company's key service
providers and customers include the Investment Adviser,
professional firms such as lenders, property agents, accounting and
law firms, tenants with which we have longstanding relationships
and transaction counterparties which are generally large and
sophisticated businesses or institutions.
|
Our Key Stakeholder
Relationships on pages 56 to 59.
|
D.
The impact of the Company's operations on the
community and the environment
|
As an owner of assets
located in communities across the UK and France, we aim to ensure
that our buildings and their surroundings provide safe and
comfortable environments for all users.
The Board and the
Investment Adviser have committed to limiting the impact of the
business on the environment where possible and engage with tenants
to seek to improve the ESG credentials of the properties owned by
the Company.
|
Our Key Stakeholder
Relationships on pages 56 to 59.
Details of the ESG policy
and strategy are included on pages 39 to 51.
The Board's approach to
sustainability is also explained in the Company's standalone
sustainability report available on the Company website.
|
E.
The desirability of the Company maintaining a
reputation for high standards of business conduct
|
The Board is mindful that
the ability of the Company to continue to conduct its investment
business and to finance its activities depends in part on the
reputation of the Board, the Investment Adviser and Investment
Advisory Team.
The risk of falling short
of the high standards expected and thereby risking business
reputation is included in the Audit and Risk Committee's review of
the Company's risk register, which is conducted at least
annually.
|
Chair's Letter on Corporate
Governance on page 63.
Our Principal Risks and
Uncertainties on pages 52 to 54.
Our Culture on page 69.
|
F.
The need to act fairly as between members of the
Company
|
The Board recognises the
importance of treating all members fairly and oversees investor
relations initiatives to ensure that views and opinions of
shareholders can be considered when setting strategy.
|
Chair's Letter on Corporate
Governance on pages 63.
Our Key Stakeholder
Relationships on pages 56 to 59.
|
Going
Concern and Viability
Statement
The Directors have considered on the appropriateness
of adopting the going concern basis in preparing the Group's and
Company's financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2024. In
assessing the going concern basis of accounting, the Directors have
considered the prospects of the Group over the period up to 30
September 2025.
Liquidity
At 30 June 2024, the Group generated net cash flow
from operating activities of £92.1 million, held cash of £38.7
million and undrawn committed facilities totalling £104.2 million
(including £50 million accordion) with no capital commitments or
contingent liabilities.
After the year end, the Group also increased its
debt capacity from £752.0 million to £825.4 million (see Note 19
for more information), leaving undrawn committed facilities of
£176.0 million available (including £50 million accordion).
The Directors are of the belief that the Group
continues to be well funded during the going concern period with no
concerns over its liquidity.
Refinancing events
At the date of signing the financial statements, the
Wells Fargo £39 million loan facility (of which £30 million is
drawn) and £50 million of the syndicate unsecured term loan fall
due for repayment during the going concern period. It is intended
that the facilities will be refinanced prior to maturity, or if
required, paid down in full utilising the Group's available cash
balances and undrawn committed facilities of over £117 million
(including post balance sheet events). All lenders have been
supportive during the year and have expressed commitment to the
long-term relationship they wish to build with the
Company.
Covenants
The Group's debt facilities include covenants in
respect of LTV and interest cover, both projected and historic. All
debt facilities, except for the unsecured facilities, are
ring-fenced with each specific lender.
The Directors have evaluated a number of scenarios
as part of the Group's going concern assessment and considered the
impact of these scenarios on the Group's continued compliance with
debt covenants. The key assumptions that have been sensitised
within these scenarios are falls in rental income and increases in
administrative cost inflation.
As at the date of issuance of this financial
information 100% of contractual rent for the period has been
collected. The Group benefits from a secure income stream from its
property assets that are let to tenants with excellent covenant
strength under long leases that are subject to upward only rent
reviews.
The list of scenarios are below and are all on top
of the base case model which includes prudent assumptions on
valuations and cost inflation. The Group is 100% fixed or hedged
(including post period end refinancings). No sensitivity for
movements in interest rates have been modelled for the hedged debt
during the going concern assessment period.
Scenario
|
Rental Income
|
Costs
|
Base case scenario (Scenario
1)
|
100% contractual rent received
when due and rent reviews based on forward looking inflation curve,
capped at the contractual rate of the individual leases.
|
Investment adviser fee based on
terms of the signed agreement (percentage of NAV as per note 27),
other costs in line with contractual
terms.
|
Scenario 2
|
Rental income to fall by
20%
|
Costs expected to remain the same
as the base case.
|
Scenario 3
|
Rental Income expected to remain
the same as the base case.
|
10% increases on base case costs
to all administrative expenses
|
The Group continues to maintain covenant compliance
for its LTV and ICR thresholds throughout the going concern
assessment period under each of the scenarios modelled. The lowest
amount of ICR headroom experienced in the worst-case stress
scenarios was 42%. Based on the latest bank commissioned
valuations, property values would have to fall by more than 26%
before LTV covenants are breached, and 19% against 30 June 2024
Company valuations. Similarly, the strictest interest cover
covenant within each of the ring-fenced banking groups is 225%,
where the portfolio is forecast to have an average interest cover
ratio of 425% during the going concern period.
Having reviewed and
considered the scenarios, the Directors consider that the Group has adequate
resources in place for at least 12 months from the date of these
results and have therefore adopted the going concern basis of
accounting in preparing the Annual Report.
Assessment of
viability
The period over which the Directors consider it
feasible and appropriate to report on the Group's viability is the
five-year period to 30 June 2029. This period has been selected
because it is the period that is used for the Group's medium-term
business plans and individual asset performance forecasts. The
assumptions underpinning these forecast cash flows and covenant
compliance forecasts were sensitised to explore the resilience of
the Group to the potential impact of the Group's significant risks,
or a combination of those risks. The principal risks on pages 52 to
54 summarise those matters that could prevent the Group from
delivering on its strategy. A number of these principal risks,
because of their nature or potential impact, could also threaten
the Group's ability to continue in business in its current form if
they were to occur. The Directors paid particular attention to the
risk of a deterioration in economic outlook which could impact
property fundamentals, including investor and occupier demand which
would have a negative impact on valuations, and give rise to a
reduction in the availability of finance.
The sensitivities performed were designed to be
severe but plausible; and to take full account of the availability
of mitigating actions that could be taken to avoid or reduce the
impact or occurrence of the underlying risks.
Viability Statement
The Board has assessed the prospects of the Group over
the five years from the balance sheet date to 30 June 2029, which
is the period covered by the Group's medium-term financial
projections.
The Board considers the resilience of projected
liquidity, as well as compliance with secured debt covenants and UK
REIT rules, under a range of inflation and property valuation
assumptions.
The principal risks and the key assumptions that were
relevant to this assessment are as follows:
Risk
|
Assumption
|
Borrowing risk
|
The Group continues to comply with all relevant loan
covenants. The Group is able to refinance all debt falling due
within the viability assessment period on acceptable
terms.
|
Interest Rate Risk
|
The increase in variable interest rates are managed by
reduction of variable debt from cash inflows and utilising interest
rate derivatives to limit the exposure to variable debt.
|
Liquidity risk
|
The Group continues to generate sufficient cash to
cover its costs while retaining the ability to make distributions.
|
Tenant risk
|
Tenants (or guarantors where relevant) comply with
their rental obligations over the term of their leases and no key
tenant suffers an insolvency event over the term of the review.
|
Based on the work performed, the Board has a
reasonable expectation that the Group will be able to continue in
business over the five-year period of its assessment.
Other disclosures
Disclosures in relation to the Company's business
model and strategy have been included within the Investment
Adviser's Report on pages 14 to 22. Disclosures in relation to the
main industry trends and factors that are likely to affect the
future performance and position of the business have been included
within The UK Grocery Market on pages 25 to 33. Disclosures in
relation to environmental and social issues have been included
within the TCFD Report on pages 39 to 51. Employee diversity
disclosures have not been included as the Directors do not consider
these to be relevant to the Company.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
The KPIs and EPRA performance
measures used by the Group in assessing its strategic progress have
been included on pages 34 to
35.
The Strategic Report was approved
by the Board and signed on its behalf by:
Nick Hewson
Chair
17 September
2024
DIRECTORS'
REPORT
The Directors present their report together with the
audited financial information for the year ended 30 June 2024. The
Corporate Governance Statement on pages 74 to 75 forms part of this
report.
Principal
activities and status
The Company is registered as a UK public limited
company under the Companies Act 2006. It is an Investment Company
as defined by Section 833 of the Companies Act 2006 and has been
established as a Closed-ended investment company with an indefinite
life. The Company has a single class of shares in issue which were
traded during the year on the on the Closed-ended investment funds
category of the LSE's Main Market. The Group has entered the Real
Estate Investment Trust regime for the purposes of UK
taxation.
The Company is a member of the Association of
Investment Companies (the "AIC").
Results and
dividends
The results for the year are set out in the attached
financial information. It is the policy of the Board to declare and
pay dividends as quarterly interim dividends.
In respect of the 30 June 2024 financial year, the
Company has declared the following interim dividends amounting to
6.06 pence per share (2023: 6.00 pence per share).
Relevant Period
|
Dividend per share (pence)
|
Ex-dividend date
|
Record date
|
Date paid
|
Quarter ended
30 September 2023
|
1.515
|
12 October 2023
|
13 October 2023
|
16 November 2023
|
Quarter ended
31 December 2023
|
1.515
|
11 January 2024
|
12 January 2024
|
14 February 2024
|
Quarter ended
31 March 2024
|
1.515
|
11 April 2024
|
12 April 2024
|
16 May 2024
|
Quarter ended
30 June 2024
|
1.515
|
11 July 2024
|
12 July 2024
|
16 August 2024
|
Dividend
policy
Subject to market conditions and performance,
financial position and outlook, it is the Directors' intention to
pay an attractive level of dividend income to shareholders on a
quarterly basis. The Company intends to grow the dividend
progressively through investment in supermarket properties with
upward-only, predominantly inflation-protected, long-term lease
agreements.
Directors
The names of the Directors who served in the year
ended 30 June 2024 are set out in the Board of Directors section on
pages 64 to 65 together with their biographical details and
principal external appointments.
Powers of
Directors
The Board will manage the Company's business and may
exercise all the Company's powers, subject to the Articles, the
Companies Act and in certain circumstances, are subject to the
authority being given to the Directors by shareholders in the
general meeting.
The Board's role is to provide entrepreneurial
leadership of the Company within a framework of prudent and
effective controls that enable risk to be assessed and managed. It
also sets up the Group's strategic aims, ensuring that the
necessary resources are in place for the Group to meet its
objectives and review investment performance. The Board also sets
the Group's values, standards and culture. Further details on the
Board's role can be found in the Corporate Governance Report on
page 63.
Appointment and replacement of Directors
All Directors were elected or re-elected at the AGM on
7 December 2023. In accordance with the AIC Code, all the Directors
will retire and those who wish to continue to serve will offer
themselves for election or re-election at the forthcoming Annual
General Meeting.
Directors'
indemnity
The Company maintains £35 million of Directors' and
Officers' Liability Insurance cover for the benefit of the
Directors, which was in place throughout the year. The level of
cover was increased to £40 million on 4 July 2024 and continues in
effect at the date of this report.
Significant
shareholdings
The table below shows the interests in shares notified
to the Company in accordance with Chapter 5 of the Disclosure
Guidance and Transparency Rules issued by the Financial Conduct
Authority who have a disclosable interest of 3% or more in the
ordinary shares of the Company as at 30 June 2024.
|
Number of shares
|
Percentage of issued share
capital
|
Blackrock Inc.
|
68,196,517
|
5.46%
|
Schroders Plc
|
63,131,941
|
5.08%
|
Close Brothers Asset Management
|
62,147,569
|
4.99%
|
Quilter Plc
|
62,058,617
|
4.99%
|
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
|
61,728,272
|
4.98%
|
Since the year end, and up to 17 September 2024, the
Company has not received any further notifications of changes of
interest in its ordinary shares in accordance with DTR 5. The
information provided is correct as at the date of notification.
Donations and
contributions
The Group approved a donation of £120,000 to The
Atrato Foundation during the year which was settled post year
end.
Branches outside
the UK
The Company has no branches outside the UK.
Financial risk
management
The Group's exposure to, and management of, capital
risk, market risk and liquidity risk is set out in note 21 to the
Group's financial information.
Amendments to the
Articles
The Articles may only be amended with shareholders'
approval in accordance with the relevant legislation.
Employees
The Group has no employees and therefore no employee
share scheme or policies for the employment of disabled persons or
employee engagement.
Anti-bribery
policy
The Company has a zero-tolerance policy towards
bribery and is committed to carrying out its business fairly,
honestly and openly. The anti-bribery policies and procedures apply
to all its Directors and to those who represent the Company.
Human
Rights
The Company has a zero-tolerance approach to modern
slavery and human trafficking and is committed to ensuring its
organisation and business partners operate with the same values.
The Company's modern slavery and human trafficking statement can be
found on the Company's website.
Research and
development
No expenditure on research and development was made
during the period.
Related party
transactions
Related party transactions for the year ended 30
June 2024 can be found in note 28 of the financial
information.
Annual General
Meeting
The Annual General Meeting of the Company will be
held on 3 December 2024.
Greenhouse gas
emissions
As a listed entity, the Company is required to
comply with the SECR regulations under the Companies (Directors'
Report) and Limited Liability Partnerships (Energy and Carbon
Report) Regulations 2018. Information regarding emissions arising
from the Group's activities are included within the TCFD aligned
report on pages 39 to 51.
Disclosure of
information to auditor
All of the Directors have taken all the steps that
they ought to have taken to make themselves aware of any
information needed by the auditor for the purposes of their audit
and to establish that the Auditor is aware of that information. The
Directors are not aware of any relevant audit information of which
the auditor is unaware.
Significant
agreements
There are no agreements with the Company or a
subsidiary in which a Director is or was materially interested or
to which a controlling shareholder was party.
Share capital
structure
As at 30 June 2024, the Company's issued share capital
consisted of 1,246,239,185 ordinary shares of one penny each, all
fully paid and listed on the Closed-ended investment funds category
of the FCA's Official List of the LSE's Main Market. Further
details of the share capital, including changes throughout the year
are summarised in note 22 of the financial information.
Subject to authorisation by Shareholder resolution,
the Company may purchase its own shares in accordance with the
Companies Act 2006. At the Annual General Meeting held in 2023,
shareholders authorised the Company to make market purchases of up
to 186,811,253 Ordinary Shares. The Company has not repurchased any
of its ordinary shares under this authority, which is due to expire
at the AGM in 2024 and appropriate renewals will be sought.
There are no restrictions on transfer or limitations
on the holding of the ordinary shares. None of the shares carry any
special rights with regard to the control of the Company. There are
no known arrangements under which financial rights are held by a
person other than the holder of the shares and no known agreements
on restrictions on share transfers and voting rights.
Post balance sheet
events
For details of events since the year end date, please
refer to note 29 of the consolidated financial information.
Corporate
Governance
The Company's statement on corporate governance can be
found in the Corporate Governance Report on pages 74 to 75 of this
Annual Report. The Corporate Governance Report forms part of this
directors' report and is incorporated into it by
cross-reference.
Information included
in the strategic report
The information that fulfils the reporting
requirements relating to the Group's business during the year and
likely future developments can be found on pages 14 to 38.
This Directors' Report was approved by the Board and
is signed on its behalf by:
Nick
Hewson
Chair
17 September 2024
ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT FUND MANAGER'S
REPORT
Background
The Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive
(the "AIFMD") came into force on 22 July 2013. The objective of the
AIFMD was to ensure a common regulatory regime for funds marketed
in or into the EU which are not regulated under the UCITS regime.
This was primarily for investors' protection and also to enable
European regulators to obtain adequate information in relation to
funds being marketed in or into the EU to assist their monitoring
and control of systemic risk issues.
The AIFM is a non-EU Alternative Investment Fund
Manager (a "Non-EU AIFM"),
the Company is a non-EU Alternative Investment Fund (a
"Non-EU AIF") and the
Company is marketed primarily into the UK, but also into the EEA.
Although the AIFM is a non-EU AIFM, so the depositary rules in
Article 21 of the AIFMD do not apply, the transparency requirements
of Articles 22 (Annual report) and 23 (Disclosure to investors) of
the AIFMD do apply to the AIFM and therefore to the Company. In
compliance with those articles, the following information is
provided to the Company's shareholders by the AIFM.
1. Material Changes
in the Disclosures to Investors
During the financial year under review, there were no
material changes to the information required to be made available
to investors before they invest in the Company under Article 23 of
the AIFMD from that information set out in the Company's prospectus
dated 1 October, 2021, save as updated in the supplementary
prospectus dated 7 April, 2022, as disclosed below and in certain
sections of the Strategic Report, those being the Chair's
Statement, Investment Adviser's Report, TCFD Compliant Report, Our
Principal Risks and the Section 172(1) Statement, together with the
Corporate Governance Report in this annual financial report.
2. Risks and Risk
Management Policy
The current principal risks facing the Company and the
main features of the risk management systems employed by AIFM and
the Company to manage those risks are set out in the Strategic
Report (Our Principal Risks and Risk and Going Concern), the Audit
and Risk Committee Report and the Directors' Report.
3. Leverage and
borrowing
The Company is entitled to employ leverage in
accordance with its investment policy and as described in the
Chair's Statement, the sections entitled "Financial Highlights" and
"Financial Overview" in the Strategic Report and the notes to the
financial information. Other than as disclosed therein, there were
no changes in the Company's borrowing powers and policies.
4. Environmental,
Social and Governance (ESG) Issues and Regulation (EU) 2019/2099 on
Sustainability-Related Disclosures in the Financial Services Sector
(the "SFDR")
As a member of the JTC group of Companies, the AIFM's
ultimate beneficial owner and controlling party is JTC Plc, a
Jersey-incorporated company whose shares have been admitted to the
Official List of the UK's Financial Conduct Authority and to
trading on the London Stock Exchange's Main Market for Listed
Securities (mnemonic JTC LN, LEI 213800DVUG4KLF2ASK33). In the
conduct of its own affairs, the AIFM is committed to best practice
in relation to ESG matters and has therefore adopted JTC Plc's ESG
framework, which can be viewed online at
https://www.jtcgroup.com/esg/. JTC Plc's sustainability report can
also be viewed online in its annual financial report located at
https://www.jtcgroup.com/investor-relations/annual-review/.
As at the date of this report, JTC Plc is a signatory
of the U.N. Principles for Responsible Investment. The JTC group is
also carbon neutral and works to support the achievement of ten of
the U.N.'s Sustainable Development Goals. JTC Plc reports under
TCFD and under the SASB framework. JTC Plc also reported publicly
to the Carbon Disclosure Project in 2023 and selected the Science
Based Targets initiative as its chosen net zero framework.
From the perspective of the SFDR, although the AIFM is
a non-EU AIFM, the Company is marketed into the EEA, so that the
AIFM is required to comply with the SFDR in so far as it applies to
the Company and the AIFM's management of the Company, which the
Company has classified as being within the scope of Article 6 of
the SFDR.
The AIFM and Atrato Capital Limited ("Atrato") as the Company's Alternative
Investment Fund Manager and Investment Adviser respectively do
consider ESG matters in their respective capacities, as explained
in SUPR's prospectus dated 1 October 2021, as updated by SUPR's
supplementary prospectus dated 7 April 2022. Copies of both of
those documents can be viewed on the AIFM's website
at https://jtcglobalaifmsolutions.com/clients/supermarket-income-reit-plc/.
Since the publication of those documents, the AIFM,
Atrato and the Company have continued to enhance their collective
approach to ESG matters and detailed reporting on (a) enhancements
made to each party's policies, procedures and operational practices
and (b) our collective future intentions and aspirations is
included in the TCFD Compliant Report included in the Strategic
Report and the ESG Committee Report in this annual financial
report. The Company is also publishing a separate Sustainability
Report alongside this report which is available on the website.
The AIFM also has a comprehensive risk matrix (the
"Matrix"), which is used to
identify, monitor and manage material risks to which the Company is
exposed, including ESG and sustainability risks, the latter being
an environmental, social or governance event or condition that, if
it occurred, could cause an actual or a potential material negative
impact on the value of an investment. We also consider
sustainability factors, those being environmental, social and
employee matters, respect for human rights, anti-corruption and
anti-bribery matters.
The AIFM is cognisant of the announcement published by
H.M. Treasury in the UK of its intention to make mandatory by 2025
disclosures aligned with the recommendations of the Task Force on
Climate-related Financial Disclosures, with a significant
proportion of disclosures mandatory by 2023. The AIFM also notes
the roadmap and interim report of the UK's Joint
Government-Regulator TCFD Taskforce published by H.M. Treasury on 9
November 2020. The AIFM continues to monitor developments and
intends to comply with the UK's regime to the extent either
mandatory or desirable as a matter of best practice.
5. Remuneration of
the AIFM's Directors and Employees
During the financial year under review, no separate
remuneration was paid by the AIFM to two of its executive
directors, Graham Taylor and Kobus Cronje, because they were both
employees of the JTC group of companies, of which the AIFM forms
part. The third executive director, Matthew Tostevin, is paid a
fixed fee of £10,000 for acting as a director. Mr Tostevin is paid
additional remuneration on a time spent basis for services rendered
to the AIFM and its clients. Other than the directors, the AIFM has
no employees. The Company has no agreement to pay any carried
interest to the AIFM. During the year under review, the AIFM paid
£10,000 in fixed fees and £46,211 in variable remuneration to Mr
Tostevin.
6. Remuneration of the AIFM Payable by the
Company
The AIFM was during the year under review paid a fee
of 0.04% per annum of the
net asset value of the Company up to £1 billion and 0.03% of the
Company's net asset value in excess of £1 billion, subject to a
minimum of £50,000 per
annum, such fee being payable quarterly in arrears. The
total fees paid to the AIFM during the year under review were £0.44
million.
JTC Global AIFM
Solutions Limited
Alternative
Investment Fund Manager
17 September
2024
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
For the year ended 30 June 2024
|
Notes
|
Year to
30 June 2024 £'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023
£'000
|
Gross rental income
|
4
|
107,851
|
95,823
|
Service charge income
|
4
|
6,822
|
5,939
|
Service charge expense
|
5
|
(7,441)
|
(6,518)
|
Net Rental
Income
|
|
107,232
|
95,244
|
Administrative and other expenses
|
6
|
(15,218)
|
(15,429)
|
Operating profit
before changes in fair value of investment properties and share of
income and profit on disposal from joint venture
|
|
92,014
|
79,815
|
Changes in fair value of
investment properties
|
13
|
(65,825)
|
(256,066)
|
|
|
|
|
Share of income from joint venture
|
|
-
|
23,232
|
Profit on disposal of joint venture
|
|
-
|
19,940
|
Operating
profit/(loss)
|
|
26,189
|
(133,079)
|
|
|
|
|
Finance income
|
9
|
23,781
|
14,626
|
Finance expense
|
9
|
(40,043)
|
(39,315)
|
Changes in fair value on interest rate
derivatives
|
18
|
(31,251)
|
10,024
|
Profit on disposal of interest rate derivatives
|
|
-
|
2,878
|
Loss before
taxation
|
|
(21,324)
|
(144,866)
|
|
|
|
|
Tax credit / (charge) for the year
|
10
|
140
|
-
|
Loss for the
year
|
|
(21,184)
|
(144,866)
|
|
|
|
|
Items to be reclassified to profit or loss
in
subsequent
periods
|
|
|
|
Fair value movements in
interest rate derivatives
|
18
|
(1,765)
|
1,068
|
Foreign exchange
movement
|
|
32
|
-
|
Total comprehensive
expense for the year
|
|
(22,917)
|
(143,798)
|
Total comprehensive
expense for the year attributable
to ordinary
Shareholders
|
|
(22,917)
|
(143,798)
|
Earnings per share
- basic and diluted
|
11
|
(1.7)
pence
|
(11.7)
pence-
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL
POSITION
As at 30 June 2024
|
Notes
|
As at
30 June 2024 £'000
|
As at
30 June 2023 £'000
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
Investment properties
|
13
|
1,768,216
|
1,685,690
|
Financial asset arising from sale and leaseback
transactions
|
15
|
11,023
|
10,819
|
Interest rate derivatives
|
18
|
15,741
|
37,198
|
Total non-current
assets
|
|
1,794,980
|
1,733,707
|
Current
assets
|
|
|
|
Interest rate derivatives
|
18
|
15,708
|
20,384
|
Trade and other receivables
|
16
|
11,900
|
142,155
|
Deferred tax asset
|
20
|
140
|
-
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
38,691
|
37,481
|
Total current
assets
|
|
66,439
|
200,020
|
Total
assets
|
|
1,861,419
|
1,933,727
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
Bank borrowings
|
19
|
597,652
|
605,609
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
1,045
|
-
|
Total non-current
liabilities
|
|
598,697
|
605,609
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
Bank borrowings due within one year
|
19
|
96,516
|
61,856
|
Deferred rental income
|
|
24,759
|
21,557
|
Trade and other payables
|
17
|
21,973
|
26,979
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
143,248
|
110,392
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
741,945
|
716,001
|
Net
assets
|
|
1,119,474
|
1,217,726
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
Share capital
|
22
|
12,462
|
12,462
|
Share premium reserve
|
22
|
500,386
|
500,386
|
Capital reduction reserve
|
22
|
629,196
|
704,531
|
Retained earnings
|
|
(24,141)
|
(2,957)
|
Cash flow hedge reserve
|
23
|
1,539
|
3,304
|
|
Other reserves
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
Total
equity
|
|
1,119,474
|
1,217,726
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value per
share - basic and diluted
|
27
|
90 pence
|
98 pence
|
EPRA NTA per
share
|
27
|
87 pence
|
93 pence
|
The consolidated financial
information was approved and authorised for issue by the Board of
Directors on 17 September 2024 and were signed on its behalf
by Nick Hewson (Chair).
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the year ended 30 June
2024
|
Share capital £'000
|
Share premium
reserve £'000
|
Cash flow hedge reserve
£'000
|
Other reserve
£'000
|
Capital reduction
reserve
£'000
|
Retained earnings £'000
|
Total £'000
|
As at 1 July 2023
|
12,462
|
500,386
|
3,304
|
-
|
704,531
|
(2,957)
|
1,217,726
|
Comprehensive income for the
year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss for the year
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(21,184)
|
(21,184)
|
Recycled from comprehensive
loss to profit and loss
|
-
|
-
|
(1,154)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,154)
|
Other comprehensive
loss
|
-
|
-
|
(611)
|
32
|
-
|
-
|
(579)
|
Total comprehensive loss for the
year
|
-
|
-
|
(1,765)
|
32
|
-
|
(21,184)
|
(22,917)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions with owners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interim dividends paid
(note 12)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(75,335)
|
-
|
(75,335)
|
As at 30 June 2024
|
12,462
|
500,386
|
1,539
|
32
|
629,196
|
(24,141)
|
1,119,474
|
For the year ended 30 June 2023
|
Share capital £'000
|
Share premium
reserve £'000
|
Cash flow hedge reserve
£'000
|
Capital reduction
reserve
£'000
|
Retained earnings £'000
|
Total £'000
|
As at 1 July
2022
|
12,399
|
494,174
|
5,114
|
778,859
|
141,909
|
1,432,455
|
Comprehensive
income for
the
year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss for the year
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(144,866)
|
(144,866)
|
Cash flow hedge reserve to profit for the year on
disposal of interest rate derivatives
|
-
|
-
|
(2,878)
|
-
|
-
|
(2,878)
|
Other comprehensive income
|
-
|
-
|
1,068
|
-
|
-
|
1,068
|
Total comprehensive
loss for the year
|
-
|
-
|
(1,810)
|
-
|
(144,866)
|
(146,676)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions with owners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares issued at a premium during the
year
|
63
|
6,301
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6,364
|
Share issue costs
|
-
|
(89)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(89)
|
Interim dividends paid (note 12)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(74,328)
|
-
|
(74,328)
|
As at 30 June
2023
|
12,462
|
500,386
|
3,304
|
704,531
|
(2,957)
|
1,217,726
|
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW
statement
For the year ended 30 June 2024
|
Notes
|
Year to
30 June 2024 £'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023 £'000
|
Operating
activities
|
|
|
|
Loss for the year (attributable to ordinary
shareholders)
|
|
(21,184)
|
(144,866)
|
Adjustments for:
|
|
|
|
Tax credit
|
|
(140)
|
-
|
Changes in fair value of interest rate derivatives
measured at fair value through profit and loss
|
|
31,251
|
(10,024)
|
Changes in fair value of
investment properties and associated rent guarantees
|
13
|
65,825
|
256,066
|
Movement in rent smoothing and lease incentive
adjustments
|
4
|
(2,434)
|
(2,763)
|
Amortisation of lease fees
|
|
18
|
-
|
Finance income
|
9
|
(23,781)
|
(14,626)
|
Finance expense
|
9
|
40,043
|
39,281
|
Share of income from joint venture
|
|
-
|
(23,232)
|
Profit on disposal of interest rate derivative
|
|
-
|
(2,878)
|
Profit on disposal of Joint Venture
|
|
-
|
(19,941)
|
Cash flows from
operating activities before changes
in working capital
|
|
89,598
|
77,017
|
(Increase) in trade and other receivables
|
|
(2,996)
|
(548)
|
Decrease in rent guarantee receivables
|
|
-
|
191
|
Increase in deferred rental income
|
|
3,202
|
5,198
|
Increase in trade and other payables
|
|
2,252
|
2,461
|
Net cash flows from
operating activities
|
|
92,056
|
84,319
|
|
|
|
|
Investing
activities
|
|
|
|
Disposal of Property, Plant & Equipment
|
|
-
|
222
|
Acquisition and development
of investment properties
|
13
|
(136,184)
|
(362,630)
|
Capitalised acquisition costs
|
|
(10,266)
|
(14,681)
|
Bank interest received
|
|
78
|
-
|
Receipts from other financial assets
|
|
290
|
290
|
Investment in joint venture
|
|
-
|
(189,528)
|
Settlement of Joint Venture carried interest
|
|
(7,500)
|
-
|
Proceeds from disposal of Joint Venture
|
|
134,912
|
292,636
|
Net cash flows used
in investing activities
|
|
(18,670)
|
(273,691)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
Year to
30 June 2024
£'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023 £'000
|
Financing
activities
|
|
|
|
Costs of share issues
|
|
-
|
(89)
|
Bank borrowings drawn
|
19
|
217,560
|
912,114
|
Bank borrowings repaid
|
19
|
(191,077)
|
(598,486)
|
Loan arrangement fees paid
|
|
(1,318)
|
(5,010)
|
Bank interest paid
|
|
(35,275)
|
(22,408)
|
Settlement of interest rate derivatives
|
|
21,182
|
8,646
|
Settlement of Joint Venture Carried Interest
|
|
-
|
(8,066)
|
Sale of interest rate derivatives
|
18
|
38,482
|
2,878
|
Purchase of interest rate derivative
|
18
|
(45,364)
|
(44,255)
|
Bank commitment fees paid
|
|
(1,031)
|
(1,708)
|
Dividends paid to equity holders
|
|
(75,335)
|
(67,963)
|
Net cash flows
(used in) / from financing activities
|
|
(72,176)
|
175,653
|
Net movement in
cash and cash equivalents in the year
|
|
1,210
|
(13,719)
|
Cash and cash
equivalents at the beginning of the year
|
|
37,481
|
51,200
|
Cash and cash
equivalents at the end of the year
|
|
38,691
|
37,481
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Basis of preparation
General information
Supermarket Income REIT plc (the "Company") is a
company registered in England and Wales with its registered office
at The Scalpel, 18th Floor, 52 Lime Street, London, EC3M
7AF. The principal activity of the Company and its subsidiaries
(the "Group") is to provide its Shareholders with an attractive
level of income together with the potential for capital growth by
investing in a diversified portfolio of supermarket real estate
assets in the UK.
At 30 June 2024 the Group comprised the Company and
its wholly owned subsidiaries as set out in Note 14.
Basis of preparation
The consolidated financial
information set out in this preliminary announcement covers the
year to 30 June 2024, with comparative figures relating to the year
to 30 June 2023, and includes the results and net assets of the
Group. The financial information has been prepared on the basis of
the accounting policies set out in the financial statements for the
year ended 30 June 2024. Whilst the financial information included
in this announcement has been computed in accordance with the
recognition and measurement requirements of UK adopted
international accounting standards this announcement does not
itself contain sufficient information to comply with
IFRS.
The financial information does not
constitute the Group's financial statements for the years ended 30
June 2024 or 30 June 2023, but is derived from those financial
statements. Those financial statements give a true and fair view of
the assets, liabilities, financial position and results of the
Group. Financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2023 have
been delivered to the Registrar of Companies and those for the year
ended 30 June 2024 will be delivered following the Company's AGM.
The auditors' reports on both the 30 June 2024 and 30 June 2023
financial statements were unqualified; did not draw attention to
any matters by way of emphasis; and did not contain statements
under section 498 (2) or (3) of the Companies Act 2006.
The principal accounting policies
applied in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements
are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to
all years presented, other than where new policies have been
adopted.
Going concern
In light of the current macroeconomic backdrop, the
Directors have placed a particular focus on the appropriateness of
adopting the going concern basis in preparing the Group's and
Company's financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2024. In
assessing the going concern basis of accounting, the Directors have
considered the prospects of the Group over the period up to 30
September 2025.
Liquidity
At 30 June 2024, the Group generated net cash flow
from operating activities of £92.1 million, held cash of £38.7
million and undrawn committed facilities totalling £54.2 million
with no capital commitments or contingent
liabilities.
After the year end, the Group also increased its
debt capacity from £752.0 million to £825.4 million (see Note 19
for more information), leaving undrawn committed facilities of
£176.0 million available (including £50.0 million accordion).
The Directors are of the belief that the Group
continues to be well funded during the going concern period with no
concerns over its liquidity.
Refinancing
events
At the date of signing the
financial statements, the Wells Fargo facility and £50 million of
the syndicate unsecured term loan fall due for repayment during the
going concern period. It is intended that the facilities
will be refinanced prior to maturity, or if required, paid down in
full utilising the Group's available cash balances and undrawn
committed facilities of over £117 million (including post balance
sheet events). All lenders have been supportive during the year and
have expressed commitment to the long-term relationship they wish
to build with the Company.
Covenants
The Group's debt facilities include covenants in
respect of LTV and interest cover, both projected and historic. All
debt facilities, except for the unsecured facilities, are
ring-fenced with each specific lender.
The Directors have evaluated a number of scenarios
as part of the Group's going concern assessment and considered the
impact of these scenarios on the Group's continued compliance with
debt covenants. The key assumptions that have been sensitised
within these scenarios are falls in rental income and increases in
administrative cost inflation.
As at the date of issuance of this Annual Report
100% of contractual rent for the period has been collected. The
Group benefits from a secure income stream from the majority of its
property assets that are let to tenants with excellent covenant
strength under long leases that are subject to upward only rent
reviews.
The list of scenarios are below and are all on top
of the base case model which includes prudent assumptions on
valuations and cost inflation. The Group is 100% hedged (including
post balance sheet events), no sensitivity for movements in
interest rates have been modelled for the hedged debt during the
going concern assessment period.
Scenario
|
Rental
Income
|
Costs
|
Base case scenario (Scenario 1)
|
100% contractual rent received when due and rent
reviews based on forward looking inflation curve, capped at the
contractual rate of the individual leases.
|
Investment adviser fee based on terms of the signed
agreement (percentage of NAV as per note 27), other costs in line
with contractual terms.
|
Scenario 2
|
Rental income to fall by 20%.
|
Costs expected to remain the same as the base
case.
|
Scenario 3
|
Rental Income expected to remain the same as the
base case.
|
10% increases on base case costs to all
administrative expenses.
|
The Group continues to maintain covenant compliance
for its LTV and ICR thresholds throughout the going concern
assessment period under each of the scenarios modelled. The lowest
amount of ICR headroom experienced in the worst-case stress
scenarios was 42%. Based on the latest bank commissioned
valuations, property values would have to fall by more than 26%
before LTV covenants are breached, and 19% against 30 June 2024
Company valuations. Similarly, the strictest interest cover
covenant within each of the ring-fenced banking groups is 225%,
where the portfolio is forecast to have an average interest cover
ratio of 425% during the going concern period.
Having reviewed and considered
three modelled scenarios, the Directors consider that the Group has
adequate resources in place for at least 12 months from the date of
issue of this annual report and have therefore adopted the going
concern basis of accounting in preparing the Annual
Report.
Accounting convention and currency
The consolidated financial information (the "financial
information") has been prepared on a historical cost basis, except
that investment properties, rental guarantees and interest rate
derivatives measured at fair value.
The financial information is presented in Pounds
Sterling and all values are rounded to the nearest thousand
(£'000), except where otherwise indicated. Pounds Sterling is the
functional currency of the Company and the presentation currency of
the Group.
Euro denominated results of the French operation have
been converted to Sterling at the average exchange rate for the
period from acquisition to 30 June 2024 of €1:£0.85, which is
considered not to produce materially different results from using
the actual rates at the date of the transactions. Year end balances
have been converted to sterling at the 30 June 2024 exchange rate
of €1:£0.85. The accounting policy for foreign currency translation
is in note 2.
Adoption of new and revised standards
There were a number of new
standards and amendments to existing standards which are required
for the Group's accounting period beginning on 1 July
2023.
The following amendments are
effective for the period beginning 1 July 2023:
- IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts
- Amendments to IAS 1 and IFRS Practice Statement 2 - Disclosure
of accounting policies
- Definition of Accounting Estimates (Amendments to IAS 8
Accounting policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and
Errors)
- Amendments to IAS 12 - Deferred tax related to assets and
liabilities arising from a single transaction
- International Tax Reform - Pillar Two Model Rules (Amendments
to IAS 12 - International tax reform - Pillar Two model
rules)
There was no material effect from
the adoption of the above-mentioned amendments to IFRS effective in
the period. They have no significant impact to the Group as they
are either not relevant to the Group's activities or require
accounting which is already consistent with the Group's current
accounting policies.
In the current financial year, the Group has adopted a
number of minor amendments to standards effective in the year
issued by the IASB as adopted by the UK Endorsement Board, none of
which have had a material impact on the Group.
There was no material effect from the adoption of
other amendments to IFRS effective in the year. They have no
significant impact on the Group as they are either not relevant to
the Group's activities or require accounting which is consistent
with the Group's current accounting policies.
Standards and interpretations in issue not yet
adopted
The following are new standards,
interpretations and amendments, which are not yet effective, and
have not been early adopted in this financial information, that
will or may have an effect on the Group's future financial
statements:
· Amendments to IAS 1 which are
intended to clarify the requirements that an
entity applies in determining whether a liability is classified as
current or non-current. The amendments are intended to be
narrow-scope in nature and are meant to clarify the requirements in
IAS 1 rather than modify the underlying principles
(effective for periods beginning on or after 1
January 2024).
The amendments include
clarifications relating to:
- How events
after the end of the reporting period affect liability
classification
- What the
rights of an entity must be in order to classify a liability as
non-current
- How an entity
assesses compliance with conditions of a liability (e.g. bank
covenants)
- How
conversion features in liabilities affect their
classification
The amendment is not expected to
have an impact on the presentation or classification of the
liabilities in the Group based on rights that are in existence at
the end of the reporting period.
· IFRS S1 General Requirements for Disclosure of
Sustainability-related Financial Information. IFRS S1 sets out
general requirements for the disclosure of material information
about sustainability-related financial risks and opportunities and
other general reporting requirements (periods beginning after 1
January 2024).
· IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures. IFRS S2 sets out
disclosure requirements that are specific to climate-related
matters (periods beginning after 1 January 2024).
·
IFRS 18 - Presentation and
Disclosure in Financial Statements. IFRS 18 sets out significant
new requirements for how financial statements are presented, with
particular focus on the statement of profit or loss, including
requirements for mandatory sub-totals to be presented, aggregation
and disaggregation of information, as well as disclosures related
to management-defined performance measures. This new standard will
first be effective for the Group for the period commencing 1 July
2027.
The Group expects to review and
determine the impact of the new standard on the Group's reporting
and financial information over the coming financial
year.
The Group acknowledges the issue of these new
standards by the International Sustainability Standards Board's
("ISSB") will monitor the consultation and decision process being
undertaken by the UK Government and FCA in determining how these
standards are implemented by UK companies.
There are other new standards and amendments to
standards and interpretations which have been issued that are
effective in future accounting periods, and which the Group has
decided not to adopt early. None of these are expected to have a
material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements
of the Group.
Significant accounting judgements, estimates and
assumptions
The preparation of this financial information in
accordance with IFRS requires the Directors of the Company to make
judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts recognised in the financial information.
Key
estimate: Fair value of investment properties
The fair value of the Group's investment properties is
determined by the Group's independent valuer on the basis of market
value in accordance with the RICS Valuation - Global Standards (the
"Red Book"). Recognised valuation techniques are used by the
independent valuer which are in accordance with those recommended
by the International Valuation Standard Committee and compliant
with IFRS 13 'Fair Value Measurement.'
The independent valuer did not include any material
valuation uncertainty clause in relation to the valuation of the
Group's investment property for 30 June 2024 or 30 June 2023.
The independent valuer is considered to have
sufficient current local and national knowledge of the supermarket
property market and the requisite skills and understanding to
undertake the valuation competently.
In forming an opinion as to fair value, the
independent valuer makes a series of assumptions, which are
typically market-related, such as those in relation to net initial
yields and expected rental values. These are based on the
independent valuer's professional judgement. Other factors taken
into account by the independent valuer in arriving at the valuation
of the Group's investment properties include the length of property
leases, the location of the properties and the strength of tenant
covenants.
The fair value of the Group's
investment properties as determined by the independent valuer,
along with the significant methods and assumptions used in
estimating this fair value, are set out in note 13.
Key judgement: Acquisition of investment properties
The Group has acquired and intends to acquire further
investment properties. At the time of each purchase the Directors
assess whether an acquisition represents the acquisition of an
asset or the acquisition of a business.
Under the Definition of a Business (Amendments to IFRS
3 "Business Combinations"), to be considered as a business, an
acquired set of activities and assets must include, at a minimum,
an input and a substantive process that together significantly
contribute to the ability to create outputs. The optional
'concentration test' is also applied, where if substantially all of
the fair value of gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single
asset (or a group of similar assets), the assets acquired would not
represent a business.
During the year, the group completed four
acquisitions; this includes the acquisition of 17 French properties
in a single transaction. In four cases the concentration test was
applied and met, resulting in the acquisitions being accounted for
as asset purchases.
All £135.8 million of acquisitions during the year
were accounted for as asset purchases.
Key judgement: Sale and leaseback transactions
The Group acquires properties under a sale and
leaseback arrangement. At the time of the purchase the Directors
assess whether the acquisition represents a true sale to determine
whether the assets can be accounted for as Investment Properties
under IFRS 16.
Under IFRS 15, for the transfer of an asset to be
accounted for as a true sale, satisfying a performance obligation
of transferring control of an asset must be met for this to be
deemed a property transaction and accounted for under IFRS 16.
During the year, the Group acquired 17 stores in
France under sale and leaseback arrangements. The terms of the sale
and underlying lease were reviewed for indicators of control and
deemed that the significant risks and rewards to ownership were
transferred to the Group and will therefore be accounted for as an
investment property acquisition.
2. Summary of material accounting
policies
The material accounting policies applied in the
preparation of the consolidated financial information is set out
below.
2.1. Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial information comprises the
financial information of the Company and all of its subsidiaries
drawn up to 30 June 2024.
Subsidiaries are those entities including special
purpose entities, directly or indirectly controlled
by the Company. Control exists when the Company is exposed or has
rights to variable returns from
its investment with the investee and has the ability to affect
those returns through its power over
the investee. In assessing control, potential voting rights that
presently are exercisable are taken
into account.
The financial information of subsidiaries are included
in the consolidated financial information from
the date that control commences until the date that control
ceases.
In preparing the consolidated financial information,
intra group balances, transactions and unrealised gains or losses
are eliminated in full.
Uniform accounting policies are adopted for all
entities within the Group.
2.2. Rental income
Rental income arising on investment properties is
accounted for in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the
lease term, as adjusted for the following:
· Any rental income
from fixed and minimum guaranteed rent review uplifts is recognised
on
a straight-line basis over the lease term, variable lease uplift
calculations are not rebased when a rent review occurs and the
variable payment becomes fixed;
· Lease incentives and
initial costs to arrange leases are spread evenly over the lease
term, even if payments are not made on such a basis. The lease term
is the non-cancellable period of the lease together with any
further term for which the tenant has the option to continue the
lease, where, at the inception of the lease, the Directors are
reasonably certain that the tenant will exercise that option.
Contingent rents, such as those arising from
indexed-linked rent uplifts or market based rent reviews, are
recognised in the period in which they are earned.
Where income is recognised in advance of the related
cash flows due to fixed and minimum guaranteed rent review uplifts
or lease incentives, an adjustment is made to ensure that the
carrying value of the relevant property, including the accrued rent
relating to such uplifts or lease incentives, does not exceed the
external valuation.
Rental income is invoiced in advance
with that element of invoiced rental income that relates to a
future period being included within deferred rental income
in the consolidated statement of financial position.
Surrender premiums received in the period are included
in rental income.
Leases classified under IFRS 9 as financial assets
recognise income received from the tenant between finance income
and a reduction of the asset value, based on the interest rate
implicit in the lease.
2.3. Service charge income
Service charge income represents amounts billed to
tenants for services provided in conjunction with leased properties
based on budgeted service charge expenditure for a given property
over a given service charge year. The Company recognises service
charge income on a straight-line basis over the service charge
term.
2.4. Service charge expense
Service charge expense represents a wide range of
costs related to the operation and upkeep of the leased properties.
These costs are allocated and charged to tenants based on agreed
terms and calculations as outlined in the lease agreements with a
portion being borne by the landlord where agreed.
2.5. Finance income
Finance income consists principally of interest
receivable from interest rate derivatives and income from financial
assets held at amortised cost. An adjustment is applied to
reclassify amounts received upon periodic settlement of interest
rate derivatives assets from change in fair value to interest
income.
2.6. Finance expense
Finance expenses consist principally of interest
payable and the amortisation of loan arrangement fees.
Loan arrangement fees are expensed using the effective
interest method over the term of the relevant loan. Interest
payable and other finance costs, including commitment fees, which
the Group incurs in connection with bank borrowings, are expensed
in the period to which they relate.
2.7. Administrative and other expenses
Administrative and other expenses, including the
investment advisory fees payable to the Investment Adviser, are
recognised as a profit or loss on an accruals basis.
2.8. Dividends payable to Shareholders
Dividends to the Company's Shareholders are recognised
when they become legally payable, as a reduction in equity in the
financial information. Interim equity dividends are recognised when
paid. Final equity dividends will be recognised when approved by
Shareholders at an AGM.
2.9. Taxation
Non-REIT taxable income
Taxation on the Group's profit or loss for the year
that is not exempt from tax under the UK-REIT regulations comprises
current and deferred tax, as applicable. Tax is recognised in
profit or loss except to the extent that it relates to items
recognised as direct movements in equity, in which case it is
similarly recognised as a direct movement in equity.
Deferred tax is provided in full using the Balance
Sheet liability method on temporary differences between the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. Deferred tax
is determined using tax rates that have been enacted or
substantively enacted by the reporting date and are expected to
apply when the asset is realised or the liability is settled.
Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that
it is probable that suitable taxable profits will be available
against which deductible temporary differences can be utilised.
Current tax is tax payable on any non-REIT taxable
income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively
enacted at the end of the relevant period.
Entry to the UK-REIT regime
The Group obtained its UK-REIT status effective from
21 December 2017. Entry to the regime results in, subject to
continuing relevant UK-REIT criteria being met, the profits of the
Group's property rental business, comprising both income and
capital gains, being exempt from UK taxation.
The Group intends to ensure that it complies with the
UK-REIT regulations on an on-going basis and regularly monitors the
conditions required to maintain REIT status.
2.10. Investment
properties
Investment properties consist of land and buildings
which are held to earn income together with the potential for
capital growth.
Investment properties are recognised when the risks
and rewards of ownership have been transferred and are measured
initially at cost, being the fair value of the consideration given,
including transaction costs. Where the purchase price (or
proportion thereof) of an investment property is settled through
the issue of new ordinary shares in the Company,
the number of shares issued is such that the fair value
of the share consideration is equal to the fair
value of the asset being acquired. Transaction costs include
transfer taxes and professional fees for legal services. Any
subsequent capital expenditure incurred in improving investment
properties is capitalised in the period incurred and included
within the book cost of the property. All other property
expenditure is written off in profit or loss as incurred.
After initial recognition, investment properties are
measured at fair value, with gains and losses recognised in profit
or loss in the period in which they arise.
Gains and losses on disposals of
investment properties will be determined as the difference between
the net disposal proceeds and the carrying value of the
relevant asset. These will be recognised in profit or loss in the
period in which they arise.
Initially, rental guarantees are recognised at their
fair value and separated from the purchase price on initial
recognition of the property being purchased. They are subsequently
measured at their fair value at each reporting date with any
movements recognised in the profit or loss.
2.11. Foreign
currency transactions
Foreign currency transactions are translated to the
respective functional currency of Group entities at the foreign
exchange rate ruling on the transaction date. Foreign exchange
gains and losses resulting from settling these, or from
retranslating monetary assets and liabilities held in foreign
currencies, are booked in the Income Statement. The exception is
for foreign currency loans and derivatives that hedge investments
in foreign subsidiaries, where exchange differences are booked in
other reserves until the investment is realised.
Assets and liabilities of foreign entities are
translated into sterling at exchange rates ruling at the Balance
Sheet date. Their income, expenses and cash flows are translated at
the average rate for the period or at spot rate for significant
items. Resultant exchange differences are booked in Other
Comprehensive Income and recognised in the Group Income Statement
when the operation is sold.
Exchange difference on non-monetary items measured at
fair value through profit or loss, being the value movement of the
investment properties, are recognised as part of the total fair
value movement for the portfolio.
2.12. Financial
assets and liabilities
Financial assets and liabilities are recognised when
the relevant Group entity becomes a party to the unconditional
contractual terms of an instrument. Unless otherwise indicated, the
carrying amounts
of financial assets and liabilities are considered by the Directors
to be reasonable estimates of their
fair values.
Financial
assets
Financial assets are recognised initially at their
fair value. All of the Group's financial assets, except interest
rate derivatives, are held at amortised cost using the effective
interest method, less any impairment.
For assets where changes in cash flows are linked to
changes in an inflation index, the Group updates the effective
interest rate at the end of each reporting period and this is
reflected in the carrying amount of the asset each reporting period
until the asset is derecognised.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash in hand and
short-term deposits in banks with an original maturity of three
months or less.
Trade and other receivables
Trade and other receivables, including rents
receivable, are recognised and carried at the lower of their
original invoiced value and recoverable amount. Provisions for
impairment are calculated using an expected credit loss model.
Balances will be written-off in profit or loss in circumstances
where the probability of recovery is assessed as being remote.
Trade and other payables
Trade and other payables are recognised initially at
their fair value and subsequently at amortised cost.
Bank borrowings
Bank borrowings are initially recognised at fair value
net of attributable transaction costs. After initial recognition,
bank borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost, using
the effective interest method. The effective interest rate is
calculated to include all associated transaction costs.
In the event of a modification to the terms of a loan
agreement, the Group considers both the quantitative and
qualitative impact of the changes. Where a modification is
considered substantial, the existing facility is treated as settled
and the new facility is recognised. Where the modification is not
considered substantial, the carrying value of the liability is
restated to the present value of the cash flows of the modified
arrangement, discounted using the effective interest rate of the
original arrangement. The difference is recognised as a gain or
loss on refinancing through the statement of comprehensive
income.
Derivative financial instruments and hedge
accounting
The Group's derivative financial instruments currently
comprise of interest rate swaps/caps. Derivatives designated as
hedging instruments utilise hedge accounting under IAS 39.
Derivatives not designated under hedge accounting are accounted for
under IFRS 9.
These instruments are used to manage the Group's cash
flow interest rate risk.
The instruments are initially recognised at fair value
on the date that the derivative contract is entered into, being the
cost of any premium paid at inception, and are subsequently
re-measured at their fair value at each reporting date.
Fair value measurement of derivative financial
instruments
The fair value of derivative financial instruments is
the estimated amount that the Group would receive or pay to
terminate the agreement at the period end date, taking into account
current interest rate expectations and the current credit rating of
the relevant group entity and its counterparties.
The Group uses valuation techniques that are
appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data is
available to measure fair value, maximising the use of relevant
observable inputs and minimising the use of unobservable inputs
significant to the fair value measurement as a whole.
A number of assumptions are used in determining the
fair values including estimations over future interest rates and
therefore future cash flows. The fair value represents the net
present value of the difference between the cash flows produced by
the contract rate and the valuation rate.
Hedge accounting
At the inception of a hedging transaction, the Group
documents the relationship between hedging instruments and hedged
items, as well as its risk management objectives and strategy for
undertaking the hedging transaction.
The Group also documents its assessment, both at hedge
inception and on an ongoing basis, of whether the derivatives that
are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting
changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items.
Assuming the criteria for applying hedge accounting
continue to be met the effective portion of gains and losses on the
revaluation of such instruments are recognised in other
comprehensive income and accumulated in the cash flow hedging
reserve. Any ineffective portion of such gains and losses will be
recognised in profit or loss within finance income or expense as
appropriate. The cumulative gain or loss recognised in other
comprehensive income is reclassified from the cash flow hedge
reserve to profit or loss (finance expense) at the same time as the
related hedged interest expense is recognised.
Interest rate derivatives that do not qualify under
hedge accounting are carried in the Group Statement of Financial
Position at fair value, with changes in fair value recognised in
the Group Statement of Comprehensive Income, net of interest
receivable/payable from the derivatives shown in the finance income
or expense line.
2.13. Equity
instruments
Equity instruments issued by the Company are recorded
at the amount of the proceeds received, net of directly
attributable issue costs. Costs not directly attributable to the
issue are immediately expensed in profit or loss.
No shares were issued in the period.
2.14. Fair value
measurements and hierarchy
Fair value is the price that would be received on the
sale of an asset, or paid to transfer a liability,
in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. The fair value measurement is based on the
presumption that the transaction takes place either in the
principal market for the asset or liability, or in the absence of a
principal market, in the most advantageous market. It is based on
the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the
asset
or liability, assuming they act in their economic best interest. A
fair value measurement of a non-financial asset takes into account
the best and highest value use for that asset.
The fair value hierarchy to be applied under IFRS 13
is as follows:
Level 1:
Quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities.
Level 2:
Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is
significant to the fair value measurement is directly or indirectly
observable.
Level 3:
Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is
significant to the fair value measurement is unobservable.
For assets and liabilities that are carried at fair
value and which will be recorded in the financial information on a
recurring basis, the Group will determine whether transfers have
occurred between levels in the hierarchy by reassessing
categorisation at the end of each reporting period.
3. Operating Segments
Operating segments are identified on the basis of
internal financial reports about components of the Group that are
regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker (which in
the Group's case is the Board, comprising the Non-Executive
Directors, and the Investment Adviser) in order to allocate
resources to the segments and to assess their performance.
The internal financial reports contain financial
information at a Group level as a whole and there are no
reconciling items between the results contained in these reports
and the amounts reported in the consolidated financial information.
These internal financial reports include the IFRS figures but also
report the non-IFRS figures for the EPRA and alternative
performance measures as disclosed in Notes 11, 27 and the
Additional Information.
The Group's property portfolio comprises investment
property. The Board considers that all the properties have similar
economic characteristics. Therefore, in the view of the Board,
there is one reportable segment.
The geographical split of revenue and material
applicable non-current assets was:
Revenue
|
Year to
30 June 2024 £'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023 £'000
|
UK
|
107,063
|
95,823
|
France
|
788
|
-
|
|
107,851
|
95,823
|
|
|
|
Investment
Properties
|
As at
30 June
2024
£'000
|
As at
30 June 2023
£'000
|
UK
|
1,704,280
|
1,685,690
|
France
|
63,936
|
-
|
|
1,768,216
|
1,685,690
|
4. Gross rental income
|
Year to
30 June 2024 £'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023 £'000
|
Rental income - freehold property
|
58,345
|
53,119
|
Rental income - long leasehold property
|
49,063
|
42,669
|
Lease surrender income
|
443
|
35
|
Gross rental
income
|
107,851
|
95,823
|
|
|
|
|
Year to
30 June
2024
£'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023
£'000
|
Property insurance recoverable
|
621
|
585
|
Service charge recoverable
|
6,201
|
5,354
|
Total property
insurance and service charge income
|
6,822
|
5,939
|
Total property
income
|
114,673
|
101,762
|
Included within rental income is a £2,197,000 (2023:
£2,512,000) rent smoothing adjustment that arises as a result of
IFRS 16 'Leases' requiring that rental income in respect of leases
with rents increasing by a fixed percentage be
accounted for on straight-line basis over the lease term. During
the year this resulted in an increase in
rental income and an offsetting entry being recognised in profit or
loss as an adjustment to the investment property
revaluation.
Also included in rental income is a £237,000 (year to
30 June 2023: £499,000) adjustment for lease incentives. Tenant
lease incentives are recognised on a straight-line basis over the
lease term as an adjustment to rental income. During the year this
resulted in an increase in rental income and an offsetting entry
being recognised in profit or loss as an adjustment to the
investment property revaluation.
On an annualised basis, rental income comprises
£54,258,000 (2023: £49,620,000) relating to the Group's largest
tenant and £30,790,000 (2023: £27,194,000)
relating to the Group's second largest tenant. There were no
further tenants representing more than 10% of annualised gross
rental income during either year.
5. Service charge expense
|
Year to
30 June 2024 £'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023 £'000
|
Property insurance expenses
|
714
|
715
|
Service charge expenses
|
6,727
|
5,803
|
Total property
insurance and service charge expense
|
7,441
|
6,518
|
6. Administrative and other
expenses
|
Year to
30 June 2024 £'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023 £'000
|
Investment Adviser fees (Note 28)
|
9,472
|
10,292
|
Directors' remuneration (Note 8)
|
410
|
364
|
Corporate administration fees
|
1,049
|
1,108
|
Legal and professional fees
|
1,475
|
1,626
|
Other administrative expenses
|
2,812
|
2,039
|
Total
administrative and other expenses
|
15,218
|
15,429
|
7. Operating profit/(loss)
Operating profit/(loss) is stated after charging fees
for:
|
Year to
30 June 2024 £'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023 £'000
|
Audit of the Company's consolidated and
individual
financial statements
|
292
|
260
|
Audit of subsidiaries, pursuant to legislation
|
88
|
95
|
Total audit
services
|
380
|
355
|
Audit related services: interim review
|
42
|
38
|
Total audit and
audit related services
|
422
|
393
|
Not included in the table above is £95,000 of
additional audit fees paid to BDO relating to the year ended 30
June 2023.
The Group's auditor also provided the following
services in relation to corporate finance services:
|
Year to
30 June 2024 £'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023 £'000
|
Other non-audit services: corporate finance
services
|
-
|
65
|
Total other
non-audit services
|
-
|
65
|
Total fees charged
by the Group's auditor
|
422
|
458
|
8. Directors' remuneration
The Group had no employees in the current or prior
year. The Directors, who are the key management personnel of the
Company, are appointed under letters of appointment for services.
Directors' remuneration, all of which represents fees for services
provided, was as follows:
|
Year to
30 June 2024 £'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023 £'000
|
Directors' fees
|
371
|
330
|
Employer's National Insurance Contribution
|
39
|
34
|
Total Directors'
remuneration
|
410
|
364
|
The highest paid Director received £75,000 (2023:
£75,000) for services during the year.
9. Finance income and expense
Finance income
|
Year to
30 June 2024 £'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023 £'000
|
Interest received on bank deposits
|
306
|
53
|
Income from financial assets held at amortised cost
(note 15)
|
494
|
483
|
Finance income on unwinding of discounted
receivable
|
203
|
2,376
|
Finance income on settlement of interest rate
derivatives (note 18)
|
22,778
|
11,714
|
Total finance
income
|
23,781
|
14,626
|
Finance expense
|
Year to
30 June 2024 £'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023 £'000
|
Interest payable on bank borrowings
|
36,823
|
29,707
|
Commitment fees payable on bank borrowings
|
817
|
1,571
|
Amortisation of loan arrangement fees*
|
2,403
|
8,037
|
Total finance
expense
|
40,043
|
39,315
|
*This includes a non-recurring exceptional charge of
£70,000 (June 2023: £1.52 million), relating to the acceleration of
unamortised arrangement fees in respect of the modification of loan
facilities under IFRS 9. Prior year also included a one-off loan
arrangement fee for the short-term J.P. Morgan loan of £4.0
million.
The above finance expense includes the following in
respect of liabilities not classified as fair value through profit
and loss:
|
Year to
30 June 2024 £'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023 £'000
|
Total interest expense on financial liabilities held
at amortised cost
|
39,226
|
37,744
|
Fee expense not part of effective interest rate for
financial liabilities held at amortised cost
|
817
|
1,571
|
Total finance
expense
|
40,043
|
39,315
|
10. Taxation
A) Tax charge in profit or loss
|
Year to
30 June 2024 £'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023 £'000
|
UK Corporation tax
|
-
|
-
|
France Corporation Tax
|
-
|
-
|
UK deferred tax
|
-
|
-
|
France deferred tax (note 20)
|
(140)
|
-
|
|
(140)
|
-
|
|
|
|
B) Total tax
expense
|
|
|
Tax (credit)/charge in profit and loss as per the
above
|
(140)
|
-
|
Share of tax expense of equity accounted joint
ventures
|
-
|
(400)
|
Total tax
(credit)/expense
|
(140)
|
(400)
|
The Company and its subsidiaries
operate as a UK Group REIT. Subject to continuing compliance with
certain rules, the UK REIT regime exempts the profits of the
Group's property rental business from UK corporation tax. To
operate as a UK Group REIT a number of conditions had to be
satisfied in respect of the Company, the Group's qualifying
activity and the Group's balance of business. Since the 21 December
2017 the Group has met all such applicable conditions.
The reconciliation of the loss before tax multiplied
by the standard rate of corporation tax for the year of 25% (2023:
20.4%) to the total tax charge is as follows:
C)
Reconciliation of the total tax charge for the year
|
Year to
30 June 2024 £'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023 £'000
|
Loss on ordinary activities before taxation
|
(21,324)
|
(144,866)
|
Theoretical tax at UK standard corporation tax rate
of 25% (2023: 20.4%)
|
(5,331)
|
(29,553)
|
Effects of:
|
|
|
Investment property and derivative revaluation not
taxable
|
24,269
|
49,680
|
Disposal of interest rate derivative
|
-
|
(587)
|
Residual business losses
|
2,481
|
4,428
|
French subsidiary allowable expenses
|
(140)
|
-
|
Other non-taxable items
|
-
|
(8,807)
|
REIT exempt income
|
(21,419)
|
(15,161)
|
Share of tax expense of equity accounted joint
ventures
|
-
|
(400)
|
Total tax
(credit)/expense for the year
|
(140)
|
(400)
|
UK REIT exempt income
includes property rental income that is exempt from UK corporation
tax in accordance with Part 12 of CTA 2010.
No deferred tax asset has been recognised in
respect of the Group's residual carried forward tax losses of £43.4
million (2023: £36.2 million) as, given the Group's REIT status, it
is considered unlikely that these losses will be utilised. The
Group is subject to French Corporation tax on its French property
rental business at a rate of 25%.
11. Earnings per share
Earnings per share ("EPS") amounts
are calculated by dividing the profit or loss for the period
attributable to ordinary equity holders of the Company by the
weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the
period. As there are no dilutive instruments outstanding, basic and
diluted earnings per share are identical.
The European Public Real Estate
Association ("EPRA") publishes guidelines for calculating on a
comparable basis. EPRA EPS is a measure of EPS designed by EPRA to
enable entities to present underlying earnings from core operating
activities, which excludes fair value movements on investment
properties and derivatives.
The Company has also included an
additional earnings measure called "Adjusted Earnings" and
"Adjusted EPS." Adjusted earnings62 is a
performance measure used by the Board to assess the Group's
financial performance and dividend payments. The metric adjusts
EPRA earnings by deducting one-off items such as debt restructuring
costs and the Joint Venture acquisition loan arrangement fee which
are non-recurring in nature and adding back finance income on
derivatives held at fair value through profit and loss. Adjusted
Earnings is considered a better reflection of the measure over
which the Board assesses the Group's trading performance and
dividend cover.
Finance income received from derivatives held at fair
value through profit and loss are added back to EPRA earnings as
this reflects the cash received from the derivatives in the period
and therefore gives a better reflection of the Group's net finance
costs.
Debt restructuring costs relate to the acceleration of
unamortised arrangement fees following the restructuring of the
Group's debt facilities during the period.
The reconciliation of IFRS Earnings, EPRA Earnings
and Adjusted Earnings is shown below:
|
Year to
30 June 2024
|
Year to
30 June 2023
|
|
£' 000
|
£' 000
|
|
Net (loss) attributable to ordinary shareholders
|
(21,184)
|
(144,866)
|
EPRA
adjustments:
|
|
|
Changes in fair
value of investment properties and rental guarantees
|
65,825
|
256,066
|
Changes in fair
value of interest rate derivatives measured at fair value through
profit and loss
|
31,251
|
(10,024)
|
Profit on disposal
of interest rate derivatives
|
-
|
(2,878)
|
Group share of
changes in fair value of joint venture investment
properties
|
-
|
(11,486)
|
Gain on disposal
of investments in joint venture
|
-
|
(19,940)
|
Deferred tax
credit
|
(140)
|
-
|
Finance income
received on interest rate derivatives held at fair value through
profit and loss
|
(22,469)
|
(9,671)
|
EPRA
Earnings
|
53,283
|
57,201
|
Adjustments
for:
|
|
|
Finance income
received on interest rate derivatives held at fair value through
profit and loss
|
22,469
|
9,671
|
Restructuring
costs in relation to the acceleration of unamortised arrangement
fees
|
70
|
1,518
|
Joint Venture
acquisition loan arrangement fee
|
-
|
4,009
|
Adjusted Earnings
|
75,822
|
72,399
|
|
Number1
|
Number1
|
Weighted average number of ordinary shares
|
1,246,239,185
|
1,242,574,505
|
1 Based on the weighted average number of ordinary
shares in issue
|
Year to
30 June 2024
|
Year to
30 June 2023
|
|
Pence per share ('p')
|
Pence per share ('p')
|
Basic and Diluted EPS
|
(1.7)
|
(11.7)
|
EPRA
adjustments:
|
|
|
Changes in fair
value of interest rate derivatives measured at FVTPL
|
2.5
|
(0.8)
|
Changes in fair
value of investment properties
and rent guarantees
|
5.3
|
20.6
|
Group share of
changes in fair value of joint venture investment
properties
|
-
|
(0.9)
|
Profit on disposal
of interest rate derivatives
|
-
|
(0.2)
|
Group share of
gain on disposal of joint venture investment properties
|
-
|
(1.6)
|
Deferred tax
credit
|
-
|
-
|
Finance income
received on interest rate derivatives held at fair value through
profit and loss
|
(1.8)
|
(0.8)
|
EPRA EPS
|
4.3
|
4.6
|
Adjustments
for:
|
|
|
Finance income
received on interest rate derivatives held at fair value through
profit and loss
|
1.8
|
0.8
|
One-off
restructuring costs in relation to the acceleration of unamortised
arrangement fees
|
-
|
0.1
|
Joint Venture
acquisition loan arrangement fee
|
-
|
0.3
|
Adjusted EPRA EPS
|
6.1
|
5.8
|
12. Dividends
|
Year to
30 June 2024 £'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023 £'000
|
Amounts recognised
as a distribution to ordinary Shareholders
in the
year:
|
|
|
Dividends
|
75,335
|
74,328
|
On 6 July 2023, the Board declared a fourth interim
dividend for the year ended 30 June 2023 of 1.500 pence per share,
which was paid on 4 August 2023 to shareholders on the register on
14 July 2023.
On 5 October 2023 the Board declared a first interim
dividend for the year ending 30 June 2024 of 1.515 pence per share,
which was paid on 16 November 2023 to shareholders on the register
on 13 October 2023.
On 4 January 2024 the Board declared a second interim
dividend for the year ending 30 June 2024 of 1.515 pence per share,
which was paid on 14 February 2024 to shareholders on the register
on 12 January 2024.
On 4 April 2024 the Board declared a third interim
dividend for the year ending 30 June 2024 of 1.515 pence per share,
which was paid on 16 May 2024 to shareholders on the register on 12
April 2024.
On 4 July 2024, the Board declared a fourth interim
dividend for the year ending 30 June 2024 of 1.515 pence per share,
which was paid on 16 August 2024 to shareholders on the register on
12 July 2024. This has not been included as a liability as at 30
June 2024.
13. Investment properties
In accordance with IAS 40 "Investment Property", the
Group's investment properties have been independently valued at
fair value by Cushman & Wakefield, an accredited independent
valuer with
a recognised and relevant professional qualification and with
recent experience in the locations and categories
of the investment properties being valued. The valuations have been
prepared in accordance with the RICS Valuation - Global
Standards and incorporate the recommendations
of the International Valuation Standards Committee which are
consistent with the principles set out
in IFRS 13.
The independent valuer in forming its opinion on
valuation makes a series of assumptions. As explained in note 2,
all the valuations of the Group's investment property at 30 June
2024 are classified as 'level 3' in the fair value hierarchy
defined in IFRS 13.
The valuations are ultimately the responsibility of
the Directors. Accordingly, the critical assumptions used in
establishing the independent valuation are reviewed by the
Board.
|
Freehold £'000
|
Long Leasehold £'000
|
Total £'000
|
At 1 July 2023
|
899,440
|
786,250
|
1,685,690
|
Property additions
|
101,104
|
34,700
|
135,804
|
Capitalised acquisition costs
|
8,093
|
2,317
|
10,410
|
Currency exchange movement
|
(874)
|
-
|
(874)
|
Revaluation movement
|
(35,747)
|
(27,067)
|
(62,814)
|
Valuation at 30
June 2024
|
972,016
|
796,200
|
1,768,216
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 July 2022
|
903,850
|
657,740
|
1,561,590
|
Property additions
|
131,600
|
231,030
|
362,630
|
Capitalised acquisition costs
|
4,132
|
10,549
|
14,681
|
Revaluation movement
|
(140,142)
|
(113,069)
|
(253,211)
|
Valuation at 30
June 2023
|
899,440
|
786,250
|
1,685,690
|
Reconciliation of
Investment Property to Independent Property Valuation
|
Year to
30 June 2024 £'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023
£'000
|
Investment Property at fair value per Group
Statement of Financial Position
|
1,768,216
|
1,685,690
|
Market Value of Property classified as Financial
Assets held at amortised cost (Note 15)
|
7,530
|
7,210
|
Total Independent
Property Valuation
|
1,775,746
|
1,692,900
|
There were four property acquisitions during the year,
all of which were direct purchases of the assets and not
acquisition of a corporate structure. They are all treated as asset
purchases.
Included within the carrying value of investment
properties at 30 June 2024 is £10,920,000 (2023: £8,724,000) in
respect of the smoothing of fixed contractual rent uplifts as
described in note 4. The difference between rents on a
straight-line basis and rents actually receivable is included
within the carrying value of the investment properties but does not
increase that carrying value over fair value.
Included within the carrying values of investment
properties at 30 June 2024 is £1,033,000 (year to 30 June
2023: £251,000) in respect of the lease incentives with
tenants in the form of rent free debtors as described in note 4 and
capitalised letting fees.
The effect of these adjustments on the revaluation
movement during the year is as follows:
|
Year to
30 June 2024 £'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023 £'000
|
Revaluation movement per above
|
(62,814)
|
(253,211)
|
Rent smoothing adjustment (note 4)
|
(2,197)
|
(2,512)
|
Movements in associated rent guarantees
|
-
|
(343)
|
Movement in Lease incentives
|
(564)
|
-
|
Movements in capitalised letting fees
|
(218)
|
-
|
Foreign exchange movement
through OCI
|
(32)
|
-
|
Change in fair
value recognised in profit or loss
|
(65,825)
|
(256,066)
|
Valuation techniques and key unobservable inputs
Valuation techniques used to derive
fair values
The valuations have been prepared on the basis of
market value which is defined in the RICS Valuation Standards as
'the estimated amount for which an asset or liability should
exchange on the date of
the valuation between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an
arm's length transaction after proper marketing wherein the parties
had each acted knowledgeably, prudently and without compulsion'.
Market value as defined in the RICS Valuation Standards is the
equivalent of fair value under IFRS.
The yield methodology approach is used when valuing
the Group's properties which uses market rental values capitalised with a market capitalisation rate. This is
sense-checked against the market comparable method (or
market comparable approach) where a property's fair value is
estimated based on comparable transactions in the market.
Unobservable inputs
Significant unobservable inputs include: the estimated
rental value ("ERV") based on market conditions prevailing at the
valuation date and net initial yield. Other unobservable inputs
include but are not limited to the future rental growth - the
estimated average increase in rent based on both market estimations
and contractual situations, and the physical condition of the
individual properties determined by inspection.
A decrease in ERV would decrease the fair value. A
decrease in net initial yield would increase the
fair value.
Sensitivity of measurement of significant valuation
inputs
As described in note 2 the determination of the
valuation of the Group's investment property portfolio is open to
judgement and is inherently subjective by nature.
Sensitivity analysis - impact of
changes in net initial yields and rental values
Year ended 30 June 2024
|
UK
|
France
|
Total
|
Fair
value
|
£1,704.3m
|
£63.9m
|
£1,768.2
|
Range of Net Initial Yields
|
4.6% -
8.0%
|
4.2% -
6.8%
|
4.6% -
8.0%
|
Range of Rental values (passing rents or ERV as
relevant) of Group's Investment Properties
|
£0.3m -
£5.1m
|
£0.6m -
£0.8m
|
£0.3m -
£5.1m
|
Weighted average of Net
Initial Yields
|
5.9%
|
6.3%
|
5.9%
|
Weighted average of Rental values (passing rents or
ERV as relevant) of Group's Investment Properties
|
£2.9m
|
£0.7m
|
£2.9m
|
Year ended 30 June 2023
|
UK
|
France
|
Total
|
Fair
value
|
£1,685.7m
|
-
|
£1,685.7m
|
Range of Net Initial Yields
|
4.7% - 7.4%
|
-
|
4.7% - 7.4%
|
Range of Rental values (passing rents or ERV as
relevant) of Group's Investment Properties
|
£0.3m - £5.1m
|
-
|
£0.3m - £5.1m
|
Weighted average of Net
Initial Yields
|
5.6%
|
-
|
5.6%
|
Weighted average of Rental values (passing rents or
ERV as relevant) of Group's Investment Properties
|
£2.8m
|
-
|
£2.8m
|
The table below analyses the sensitivity on the fair
value of investment properties for changes in rental values and net
initial yields:
|
+2%
Rental value
£m
|
-2%
Rental value
£m
|
+0.5% Net Initial Yield
£m
|
-0.5%
Net Initial Yield
£m
|
(Decrease)/increase
in the fair value of investment properties as at 30 June
2024
|
35.4
|
(35.4)
|
(138.1)
|
164.1
|
(Decrease)/increase in the fair value of investment
properties as at 30 June 2023
|
33.7
|
(33.7)
|
(139.9)
|
168.1
|
14. Subsidiaries
The entities listed in the following table were the
subsidiary undertakings of the Company at 30 June 2024 all of which
are wholly owned. All but those noted as Jersey or French entities
below are subsidiary undertakings incorporated in England.
Company name
|
Holding
type
|
Nature of business
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK
Limited+
|
Direct
|
Intermediate parent company
|
Supermarket Income Investments (Midco2) UK
Limited+
|
Direct
|
Intermediate parent company
|
Supermarket Income Investments (Midco3) UK
Limited+
|
Direct
|
Intermediate parent company
|
Supermarket Income Investments (Midco4) UK
Limited+
|
Direct
|
Intermediate parent company
|
SII UK Halliwell (MIDCO) LTD+
|
Direct
|
Intermediate parent company
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (Midco6)
Limited+
|
Direct
|
Intermediate parent company
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (Midco7)
Limited+
|
Direct
|
Intermediate parent company
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (Midco8)
Limited*+
|
Direct
|
Intermediate parent company
|
SUPR Green Energy Limited+
|
Direct
|
Energy provision company
|
SUPR Finco Limited+
|
Direct
|
Holding company
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO1)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO2)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO3)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO4)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO5)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO6)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO7)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO8)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO9)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO10)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO11)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO12)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO16)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO16a)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO16b)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO16c)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO17)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
TPP Investments Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
T (Partnership) Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
The TBL Property Partnership
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO19)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO20)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO21)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO22)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO23)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO24)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO25)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO26)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO27)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO28)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO29)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO30)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO31)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO32)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO33)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO34)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO35)
Limited^-
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO36)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO37)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO38)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO39)
Limited^-
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO40)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO41)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO42)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO43)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO44)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO45)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO47)
Limited+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO48)
Limited*+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments UK (NO49)
Limited*+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
The Brookmaker Unit Trust^-
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Brookmaker Limited Partnership#
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Brookmaker (GP) Limited#
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Brookmaker (Nominee) Limited#
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Horner (GP) Limited^-
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Horner (Jersey) Limited Partnership^-
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Horner REIT^-
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments France 1"*¨
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments France 2"*¨
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments France 3"*¨
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments France 4"*¨
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments France 5"*¨
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
Supermarket Income Investments France 6"*¨
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
SII UK Halliwell (No1) LTD+
|
Indirect
|
Investment in Joint venture
|
SII UK Halliwell (No2) LTD+
|
Indirect
|
Property investment
|
SII UK Halliwell (No3) LTD+
|
Indirect
|
Investment in Joint venture
|
SII UK Halliwell (No4) LTD+
|
Indirect
|
Investment in Joint venture
|
SII UK Halliwell (No5) LTD+
|
Indirect
|
Investment in Joint venture
|
SII UK Halliwell (No6) LTD+
|
Indirect
|
Investment in Joint venture
|
* New subsidiaries incorporated during the year ended
30 June 2024
** Subsidiaries acquired during the year ended 30
June 2024
^ Jersey registered entity
" France registered entity
+ Registered office: The Scalpel 18th
Floor, 52 Lime Street, London, United Kingdom, EC3M 7AF
- Registered office:
3rd Floor, Gaspe House, 66-72 Esplanade, St
Helier, Jersey, JE1 2LH
# Registered office:
8th Floor 1 Fleet Place, London, United Kingdom,
EC4M 7RA
¨ Registered office: Tour Pacific,
11-13 Cours Valmy, 92977 Paris La Défense Cedex
The following subsidiaries will be exempt from the
requirements of the Companies Act 2006 relating to the audit of
individual accounts by virtue of Section 479A of that Act.
Company name
|
Companies House
Registration Number
|
SII UK Halliwell (MIDCO) LTD
|
12473355
|
SUPR Green Energy Limited
|
12890276
|
SII UK Halliwell (No1) LTD
|
12475261
|
SII UK Halliwell (No2) LTD
|
12475599
|
SII UK Halliwell (No3) LTD
|
12478141
|
SII UK Halliwell (No4) LTD
|
12604032
|
SII UK Halliwell (No5) LTD
|
12605175
|
SII UK Halliwell (No6) LTD
|
12606144
|
SUPR Finco Limited
|
14292760
|
15. Financial asset arising from sale and
leaseback transactions
|
Year to
30 June 2024 £'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023
£'000
|
At start of year
|
10,819
|
10,626
|
Additions
|
-
|
-
|
Interest income recognised in profit and loss (note
9)
|
494
|
483
|
Lease payments received during the period
|
(290)
|
(290)
|
At end of
period
|
11,023
|
10,819
|
On 8 June 2022, the Group acquired an Asda store in Carcroft, via a
sale and leaseback transaction for £10.6 million, this has been
recognised in the Statement of Financial Position as a Financial
asset in accordance with IFRS 9. The financial asset is measured
using the amortised cost model, which recognises the rental
payments as financial income and reductions of the asset value
based on the implicit interest rate in the lease. As at 30 June
2024 the market value of the property was estimated at £7.5 million
(2023: £7.2 million).
Assets held at amortised cost are assessed annually
for impairment with any impairment recognised as an allowance for
expected credit losses measured at an amount equal to the lifetime
expected credit losses. The Group considers historic, current and
forward-looking information to determine expected credit losses
arising from either a change in the interest rate implicit in the
lease or factors impacting the customer's ability to make lease
payments. Based on the information currently available the Group
does not expect any credit losses and the asset has not been
impaired in the period.
16. Trade and other receivables
|
As at
30 June 2024 £'000
|
As at
30 June 2023
£'000
|
Interest receivable on settlement of derivatives
|
4,946
|
3,122
|
Other receivables
|
6,077
|
1,601
|
Receivable from joint venture disposal
|
-
|
136,582
|
Prepayments and accrued income
|
877
|
850
|
Total trade and
other receivables
|
11,900
|
142,155
|
The Group applies the IFRS 9 simplified approach to
measuring expected credit losses using a lifetime expected credit
loss provision for trade receivables. To measure expected credit
losses on a collective basis, trade receivables are grouped based
on similar credit risk and ageing. The expected loss rates are
based on the Group's historical credit losses experienced over the
period from incorporation to 30 June 2024. The historical loss
rates are then adjusted for current and forward-looking information
on macro-economic factors affecting the Group's customers. Both the
expected credit loss provision and the incurred loss provision in
the current and prior year are immaterial. No reasonable possible
changes in the assumptions underpinning the expected credit loss
provision would give rise to a material expected credit loss.
17. Trade and other payables
|
As at
30 June 2024 £'000
|
As at
30 June 2023
£'000
|
Accrued interest payable
|
8,072
|
6,524
|
Other corporate accruals
|
9,516
|
15,945
|
VAT payable
|
4,385
|
4,510
|
Total trade and
other payables
|
21,973
|
26,979
|
18. Interest rate derivatives
|
As at
30 June 2024 £'000
|
As at
30 June 2023
£'000
|
Non-current asset: Interest rate swaps
|
12,499
|
35,601
|
Non-current asset: Interest rate caps
|
3,242
|
1,597
|
Current Asset: Interest rate swaps
|
13,456
|
16,800
|
Current Asset: Interest rate cap
|
2,252
|
3,584
|
31,449
57,583
The rate swaps are remeasured to fair value by the
counterparty bank on a quarterly basis.
The fair value at the end of year comprises:
|
Year to 30 June 2024 £'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023
£'000
|
At start of year (net)
|
57,583
|
5,114
|
Interest rate derivative premium paid on
inception
|
47,494
|
44,255
|
Disposal of interest rate derivatives
|
(40,612)
|
(2,878)
|
Changes in fair value of interest rate derivative in
the year (P&L)
|
(8,782)
|
19,695
|
Changes in fair value of interest rate derivative in
the year (OCI)
|
(1,456)
|
3,111
|
(Credit)/Charge to the income statement (P&L)
(note 9)
|
(22,469)
|
(9,671)
|
(Credit)/Charge to the income statement (OCI) (note
9)
|
(309)
|
(2,043)
|
Fair value at end
of year (net)
|
31,449
|
57,583
|
To partially mitigate the interest rate risk that
arises as a result of entering into the floating rate debt
facilities referred to in note 19, the Group has entered into
derivative interest rate swaps and caps.
A summary of these derivatives as at 30 June 2024 are
shown in the table below:
Issuer
|
Derivative
Type
|
Notional
amount £m
|
Premium
Paid £m
|
Mark to
Market 30 June 2024 £m
|
Average
Strike Rate
|
Effective
Date
|
|
Maturity
Date
|
BLB
|
Interest Rate Swap
|
£37.3
|
£1.7
|
£1.2
|
2.58%
|
Mar-23
|
|
Mar-26
|
BLB
|
Interest Rate Swap
|
£22.2
|
£1.0
|
£0.7
|
2.58%
|
Mar-23
|
|
Mar-26
|
BLB
|
Interest Rate Swap
|
£27.4
|
£1.2
|
£0.9
|
2.58%
|
Mar-23
|
|
Mar-26
|
Wells Fargo
|
Interest Rate Swap
|
£30.0
|
£2.3
|
£1.1
|
1.33%
|
Sep-23
|
|
Jul-25
|
SMBC
|
Interest Rate Swap
|
£50.0
|
£3.7
|
£1.7
|
1.33%
|
Sep-23
|
|
Jul-25
|
SMBC
|
Interest Rate Swap
|
£67.0
|
£6.5
|
£3.7
|
1.73%
|
Sep-23
|
|
Sep-26
|
Barclays
|
Interest Rate Cap
|
£96.6
|
£2.9
|
£2.8
|
1.40%
|
Aug-24
|
|
Jul-25
|
Wells Fargo
|
Interest Rate Swap
|
£204.3
|
£22.2
|
£12.9
|
1.96%
|
Sep-23
|
|
Jul-27
|
Wells Fargo
|
Interest Rate Swap
|
£50.0
|
£4.8
|
£2.7
|
1.66%
|
Sep-23
|
|
Jul-26
|
Wells Fargo
|
Interest Rate Swap
|
£3.2
|
£0.4
|
£0.4
|
0.00%
|
Feb -24
|
|
Jul-27
|
SMBC
|
Interest Rate Cap
|
£96.6
|
£1.4
|
£1.3
|
1.40%
|
Jul-25
|
|
Jan-26
|
SMBC
|
Interest Rate Cap
|
£30.0
|
£0.4
|
£0.4
|
1.40%
|
Jul-25
|
|
Jan-26
|
SMBC
|
Interest Rate Cap
|
£50.0
|
£0.8
|
£0.7
|
1.40%
|
Jul-25
|
|
Jan-26
|
SMBC
|
Interest Rate Cap
|
£3.0
|
£0.4
|
£0.3
|
1.21%
|
Nov-23
|
|
Jun-27
|
SMBC
|
Interest Rate Swap
|
£37.5
|
£0.6
|
£0.6
|
3.61%
|
Mar-24
|
|
Sep-26
|
Total
|
|
|
£50.3
|
£31.4
|
-
|
-
|
|
-
|
90% of the Group's outstanding debt as at 30 June 2024
was hedged through the use of fixed rate debt or financial
instruments (30 June 2023: 100%). It is the Group's target to hedge
at least 50% of the Group's total debt at any time using fixed rate
loans or interest rate derivatives.
The Group restructured its derivatives during the year
to match the changes in its borrowings, the movements in the
Group's fair value derivatives are recognised in the profit and
loss. There was one derivative terminated in the year that hedged
the Wells facility and was accounted for under hedge accounting; on
derecognition of hedge accounting, the cash flow hedge reserve is
recycled to the profit and loss over the remaining term of the
Wells Fargo facility.
The derivatives have been valued in accordance with
IFRS 13 by reference to interbank bid market rates as at the close
of business on the last working day prior to each balance sheet
date. The fair values are calculated using the present values of
future cash flows, based on market forecasts of interest rates and
adjusted for the credit risk of the counterparties. The amounts and
timing of future cash flows are projected on the basis of the
contractual terms.
All interest rate derivatives are classified as level
2 in the fair value hierarchy as defined under IFRS 13 and there
were no transfers to or from other levels of the fair value
hierarchy during the year.
19. Bank borrowings
Amounts falling due within one year:
|
As at
30 June 2024 £'000
|
As at
30 June 2023
£'000
|
Secured debt
|
96,560
|
-
|
Unsecured debt
|
-
|
62,090
|
Less: Unamortised finance costs
|
(44)
|
(234)
|
Bank borrowings per
the consolidated statement of financial position
|
96,516
|
61,856
|
Amounts falling due
after more than one year:
|
|
|
Secured debt
|
186,225
|
291,551
|
Unsecured debt
|
414,981
|
318,508
|
Less: Unamortised finance costs
|
(3,554)
|
(4,450)
|
Bank borrowings per
the consolidated statement of financial position
|
597,652
|
605,609
|
Total bank
borrowings
|
694,168
|
667,465
|
A summary of the Group's borrowing facilities as at 30
June 2024 are shown below:
Lender
|
Facility
|
Expiry
|
Expiry[63]
|
Credit
Margin
|
Variable/
hedged^
|
Loan
commitment
£m
|
Amount
drawn
30 June
2024
£m
|
HSBC
|
Revolving
credit facility
|
Sep
2026
|
Sep
2028
|
1.7%
|
EURIBOR -
3.71%
|
£75.0
|
£69.3
|
Deka
|
Term
Loan
|
Aug
2024
|
Aug
2024
|
1.35%
|
0.54%
|
£47.6
|
£47.6
|
Deka
|
Term
Loan
|
Aug
2024
|
Aug
2024
|
1.35%
|
0.70%
|
£29.0
|
£29.0
|
Deka
|
Term
Loan
|
Aug
2024
|
Aug
2024
|
1.40%
|
0.32%
|
£20.0
|
£20.0
|
BLB
|
Term
Loan
|
Mar
2026
|
Mar
2026
|
1.65%
|
SWAP -
2.58%
|
£86.9
|
£86.9
|
Wells
Fargo
|
Revolving
credit facility
|
Jul
2025
|
Jul
2025
|
2.00%
|
SWAP -
1.33%
|
£30.0
|
£30.0
|
Wells
Fargo
|
Revolving
credit facility
|
Jul
2025
|
Jul
2025
|
2.00%
|
SONIA -
5.20%
|
£9.0
|
-
|
Syndicate
|
Revolving
credit facility
|
Jul
2027
|
Jul
2029
|
1.50%
|
SWAP -
1.92%
|
£250.0
|
£210.5
|
Syndicate
|
Term
Loan
|
Jul
2025
|
Jul
2026
|
1.50%
|
SWAP -
1.33%
|
£50.0
|
£50.0
|
Syndicate
|
Term
Loan
|
Jul
2026
|
Jul
2027
|
1.50%
|
SWAP -
1.66%
|
£50.0
|
£50.0
|
SMBC
|
Term
Loan
|
Sep
2026
|
Sept
2028
|
1.40%
|
SWAP -
1.73%
|
£67.0
|
£67.0
|
SMBC
|
Term
Loan
|
Sep
2026
|
Sept
2028
|
1.55%
|
SWAP -
3.61%
|
£37.5
|
£37.5
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
£752.0
|
£697.8
|
*Includes
extension options that can be utilised following approval from all
parties.
^ Average rate from 1 July 2024 to expiry of the debt excluding
extension options.
The Group has been in compliance with all of the
financial covenants across the Group's bank facilities as
applicable throughout the periods covered by this financial
information.
Any associated fees in arranging the bank borrowings
that are unamortised as at the end of the year are offset against
amounts drawn under the facility as shown in the table above. The
debt is secured
by charges over the Group's investment properties and by charges
over the shares of certain Group undertakings, not including the
Company itself. There have been no defaults of breaches of any loan
covenants during the current year or any prior period.
The Group's borrowings carried at amortised cost are
considered to be approximate to their fair value.
Post year end, the Deka facility matured in August
2024, the Group announced the arrangement of a new £100.0 million
unsecured facility with ING Bank to replace the Deka facility. The
Group also completed an agreement with a group of institutional
investors for a private placement of €83.0 million of new senior
unsecured notes. For more information see note 29.
20. Deferred tax
The deferred tax asset relates entirely to unutilised
trading losses on the Group's French resident companies.
|
Audited
|
Audited
|
|
Year to
|
Year to
|
30 June 2024
|
30 June 2023
|
£'000
|
£'000
|
At the start of the year
|
-
|
-
|
Deferred tax on unutilised French trading losses
|
(140)
|
-
|
Net credit to income statement (note 10)
|
(140)
|
-
|
|
|
|
At the end of the
year
|
(140)
|
-
|
Deferred tax has been calculated based on local rates applicable
under local legislation substantively enacted at the balance sheet
date.
A deferred tax asset of £0.1 million has been
recognised for unutilised trading losses arising on the French
Companies in the period. It is the expectation that these losses
will be offset against trading profits for the French companies to
reduce French Corporation Tax charges in future years. Included in
the investment property revaluation movement in the period is a
£6.1 million decrease in the fair value of the French properties
relating to capitalised acquisition costs. No deferred tax asset
has been recognised in respect of unrealised capital losses that
would be available on disposal of the properties at a loss at the
current market value as it is considered there would not be
additional French properties to benefit against the capital
loss.
21. Categories of financial instruments
|
As at
30 June 2024 £'000
|
As at
30 June 2023
£'000
|
Financial
assets
|
|
|
Financial assets
at amortised cost:
|
|
|
Financial asset arising from sale and leaseback
transaction
|
11,023
|
10,819
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
38,691
|
37,481
|
Trade and other receivables
|
11,023
|
141,305
|
Financial assets
at fair value:
|
|
|
Interest rate derivative
|
31,449
|
54,278
|
Derivatives in
effective hedges:
|
|
|
Interest rate derivative
|
-
|
3,304
|
Total financial
assets
|
92,186
|
247,187
|
|
|
|
Financial
liabilities
|
|
|
Financial
liabilities at amortised cost:
|
|
|
Secured debt
|
281,635
|
289,736
|
Unsecured debt
|
412,533
|
377,729
|
Trade and other payables (note 17)
|
18,634
|
22,469
|
Total financial
liabilities
|
712,802
|
689,934
|
At the year end, all financial assets and liabilities
were measured at amortised cost except for the interest rate
derivatives which are measured at fair value. The interest rate
derivative valuation is classified as 'level 2' in the fair value
hierarchy as defined in IFRS 13 and its fair value was calculated
using the present values of future cash flows, based on market
forecasts of interest rates and adjusted for the credit risk of the
counterparties.
Financial risk management
Through the Group's operations and use of debt
financing it is exposed to certain risks. The Group's financial
risk management objective is to minimise the effect of these risks,
for example by using interest rate cap and interest rate swap
derivatives to partially mitigate exposure to fluctuations in
interest rates, as described in note 18.
The exposure to each financial risk considered
potentially material to the Group, how it arises and the policy for
managing it is summarised below.
Market risk - Interest rate risk
Market risk is defined as the risk that the fair value
or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate
because of changes in market prices. The Group's market risk
arises from open positions in interest bearing assets and
liabilities, to the extent that these are exposed to general and
specific market movements.
The Group's interest-bearing financial instruments
comprise cash and cash equivalents and bank borrowings. 90% of the
borrowings are hedged and therefore at a fixed rate. Changes in
market interest rates therefore effects the value of the
derivatives for the hedged debt and for the unhedged portion it
affects the Group's finance income and costs. The Group's
sensitivity to changes in interest rates, calculated on the basis
of a ten-basis point increase in the three-month SONIA daily rate/
EURIBOR, was as follows:
|
Year to
30 June 2024
£'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023 £'000
|
Effect on profit
|
1,187
|
1,383
|
Effect on other
comprehensive income and equity
|
-
|
58
|
Trade and other receivables and payables are interest
free as long as they are paid in accordance with their terms, and
have payment terms of less than one year, so it is assumed that
there is no material market risk associated with these financial
instruments.
Market risk - currency risk
The Group prepares its financial
information in Sterling. 4% of the Group's Investment Properties
are denominated in Euros and as a result the group is subject to
foreign currency exchange risk. This risk is partially hedged
because within the Group's French operations, rental income,
interest costs and the majority of both assets and liabilities are
Euro denominated. An unhedged currency risk remains on the value of
the Group's net investment in, and net returns from, its French
operations.
The Group's sensitivity to changes
in foreign currency exchange rates, calculated on a 10% increase in
average and closing Sterling rates against the Euro, was as
follows, with a 10% decrease having the opposite effect:
|
Year to
30 June 2024
£'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023 £'000
|
Increase/(decrease) in net
assets
|
(580)
|
-
|
Increase in profit/(loss)
for the year
|
(584)
|
-
|
Market risk - inflation
Inflation risk arises from the impact of inflation on
the Group's income and expenditure. The majority of the Group's
passing rent at 30 June 2024 is subject to inflation-linked rent
reviews. Consequently, the Group is exposed to movements in the
Retail Prices Index ("RPI"), which is the relevant inflation
benchmark. However, all RPI-linked rent review provisions provide
those rents will only be subject to upwards review and never
downwards. As a result, the Group is not exposed to a fall in rent
in deflationary conditions.
The Group does not expect inflation risk to have a
material effect on the Group's administrative expenses, with the
exception of the investment advisory fee which is determined as a
function of the reported net asset value of the Group.
Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group
if a counterparty fails to meet its contractual obligations. The
principal counterparties are the Group's tenants (in respect of
rent receivables arising under operating leases) and banks (as
holders of the Group's cash deposits).
The credit risk of rent receivables is considered low
because the counterparties to the operating leases are considered
by the Board to be high quality tenants and any lease guarantors
are of appropriate financial strength. Rent collection dates and
statistics are monitored to identify any problems at an early
stage, and if necessary rigorous credit control procedures will be
applied to facilitate the recovery of rent receivables. The credit
risk on cash deposits is limited because the counterparties are
banks with credit ratings which are acceptable to the Board and are
kept under review each quarter.
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk arises from the Group's management of
working capital and the finance costs and principal repayments on
its secured debt. It is the risk that the Group will not be able to
meet its financial obligations as they fall due.
The Group seeks to manage its liquidity risk by
ensuring that sufficient cash is available to meet its foreseeable
needs. These liquidity needs are relatively modest and are capable
of being satisfied by the surplus available after rental receipts
have been applied in payment of interest as required by the credit
agreement relating to the Group's secured debt.
Before entering into any financing arrangements, the
Board assesses the resources that are expected to be available to
the Group to meet its liabilities when they fall due. These
assessments are made on the basis of both base case and downside
scenarios. The Group prepares detailed management accounts which
are reviewed by the Board at least quarterly to assess ongoing
liquidity requirements and compliance with loan covenants. The
Board also keeps under review the maturity profile of the Group's
cash deposits in order to have reasonable assurance that cash will
be available for the settlement of liabilities when they fall
due.
The following table shows the maturity analysis for
financial assets and liabilities. The table has been drawn up based
on the undiscounted cash flows of non-derivative financial
instruments, including future interest payments, based on the
earliest date on which the Group can be required to pay and
assuming that the SONIA daily and EURIBOR rate remains at the 30
June 2024 rate. Interest rate derivatives are shown at fair value
and not at their gross undiscounted amounts.
As at 30
June 2024
|
Less than one year £'000
|
One to two years £'000
|
Two to five years £'000
|
More than five years £'000
|
Total
£'000
|
Financial
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
38,691
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
38,691
|
Trade and other receivables
|
11,023
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
11,023
|
Amortised cost asset
|
290
|
290
|
946
|
74,602
|
76,128
|
Interest rate derivatives
|
15,708
|
12,209
|
3,532
|
-
|
31,449
|
Total financial
assets
|
65,712
|
12,499
|
4,478
|
74,602
|
157,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank borrowings
|
119,810
|
186,374
|
443,364
|
-
|
749,548
|
Trade and other payables
|
17,589
|
-
|
-
|
1,045
|
18,634
|
Total financial
liabilities
|
137,399
|
186,374
|
443,364
|
1,045
|
768,182
|
As at 30 June
2023
|
Less than one year £'000
|
One to two years £'000
|
Two to five years £'000
|
More than five years £'000
|
Total
£'000
|
Financial
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
37,481
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
37,481
|
Trade and other receivables
|
141,305
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
141,305
|
Amortised cost asset
|
290
|
290
|
908
|
74,930
|
76,418
|
Interest rate derivatives
|
20,384
|
20,564
|
16,635
|
-
|
57,583
|
Total financial
assets
|
199,460
|
20,854
|
17,543
|
74,930
|
312,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank borrowings
|
81,545
|
94,080
|
549,575
|
-
|
725,200
|
Trade and other payables
|
22,469
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
22,469
|
Total financial
liabilities
|
104,014
|
94,080
|
549,575
|
-
|
747,669
|
Capital risk management
The Board's primary objective when monitoring capital
is to preserve the Group's ability to continue as a going concern,
while ensuring it remains within its debt covenants so as to
safeguard secured assets and avoid financial penalties.
Bank borrowings on secured facilities are secured on
the Group's property portfolio by way of fixed charges over
property assets and over the shares in the property-owning
subsidiaries and any intermediary holding companies of those
subsidiaries.
At 30 June 2024, the capital structure of the Group
consisted of bank borrowings (note 19), cash and cash equivalents,
and equity attributable to the Shareholders of the Company
(comprising share capital, retained earnings and the other reserves
referred to in notes 22 to 24).
In managing the Group's capital structure, the Board
considers the Group's cost of capital. In order to maintain or
adjust the capital structure, the Group keeps under review the
amount of any dividends or other returns to Shareholders and
monitors the extent to which the issue of new shares or the
realisation of assets may be required.
Reconciliation of
financial liabilities relating to financing activities
|
Total bank borrowings
£'000
|
Interest and commitment fees payable
£'000
|
Interest rate derivatives
£'000
|
Total
£'000
|
As at 1 July
2023
|
667,465
|
6,837
|
(57,583)
|
616,719
|
Cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
Debt drawdowns in the year
|
217,560
|
-
|
-
|
217,560
|
Debt repayments in the year
|
(191,077)
|
-
|
-
|
(191,077)
|
Interest and commitment fees paid
|
-
|
(36,305)
|
-
|
(36,305)
|
Loan arrangement fees paid
|
(1,318)
|
-
|
-
|
(1,318)
|
Interest rate premium paid
|
-
|
-
|
(45,364)
|
(45,364)
|
Interest rate derivative disposal
|
-
|
-
|
38,482
|
38,482
|
Non-cash movements:
|
|
|
|
|
Finance costs in the statement of comprehensive
income
|
2,403
|
37,605
|
-
|
40,008
|
Finance income in the statement of comprehensive
income
|
-
|
-
|
22,778
|
22,778
|
Fair value changes
|
-
|
-
|
10,238
|
10,238
|
Foreign exchange movement
|
(865)
|
-
|
-
|
(865)
|
As at 30 June
2024
|
694,168
|
8,137
|
(31,449)
|
670,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at 1 July
2022
|
348,546
|
1,939
|
(5,114)
|
345,371
|
Cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
Debt drawdowns in the year
|
912,114
|
-
|
-
|
912,114
|
Debt repayments in the year
|
(598,486)
|
-
|
-
|
(598,486)
|
Interest and commitment fees paid
|
-
|
(24,116)
|
-
|
(24,116)
|
Loan arrangement fees paid
|
(5,010)
|
-
|
-
|
(5,010)
|
Interest rate premium paid
|
-
|
-
|
(44,255)
|
(44,255)
|
Interest rate derivative disposal
|
-
|
-
|
2,878
|
2,878
|
Non-cash movements:
|
|
|
|
|
Finance costs in the statement of comprehensive
income
|
10,301
|
29,014
|
(22,806)
|
16,509
|
Fair value changes
|
-
|
-
|
11,714
|
11,714
|
As at 30 June
2023
|
667,465
|
6,837
|
(57,583)
|
616,719
|
Movements in respect to share capital are disclosed in
note 22 below.
The interest and commitment fees payable are included
within the corporate accruals balance in note 17. Cash flow
movements are included in the consolidated statement of cash flows
and the non-cash movements are included in note 9. The movements in
the interest rate derivative financial liabilities can be found in
note 18.
22. Share capital
|
Ordinary Shares
of 1 pence
Number
|
Share capital £'000
|
Share premium reserve
£'000
|
Capital reduction reserve
£'000
|
Total
£'000
|
As at 1 July
2023
|
1,246,239,185
|
12,462
|
500,386
|
704,531
|
1,217,379
|
Dividend paid in the period (note 12)
|
|
|
|
(75,335)
|
(75,335)
|
As at 30 June
2024
|
1,246,239,185
|
12,462
|
500,386
|
629,196
|
1,142,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at 1 July
2022
|
1,239,868,420
|
12,399
|
494,174
|
778,859
|
1,285,432
|
Scrip Dividends issued and fully paid - 22
August 2022
|
1,898,161
|
19
|
2,316
|
-
|
2,335
|
Scrip Dividends issued and fully paid - 16
November 2022
|
866,474
|
9
|
869
|
-
|
878
|
Scrip Dividends issued and fully paid - 23
February 2023
|
729,198
|
7
|
721
|
-
|
728
|
Scrip Dividends issued and fully paid - 26 May
2023
|
2,876,932
|
28
|
2,395
|
-
|
2,423
|
Share issue costs
|
-
|
-
|
(89)
|
-
|
(89)
|
Dividend paid in the period (note 12)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(74,328)
|
(74,328)
|
As at 30 June
2023
|
1,246,239,185
|
12,462
|
500,386
|
704,531
|
1,217,379
|
23. Cash flow hedge reserve
|
Year to
30 June 2024
£'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023 £'000
|
At start of the period
|
3,304
|
5,114
|
Recycled comprehensive loss
to profit and loss
|
(1,154)
|
-
|
Cash flow hedge reserve
taken to profit or loss for the period on disposal of interest rate
derivatives
|
-
|
(2,878)
|
Fair value movement of
interest rate derivatives in effective hedges
|
(611)
|
1,068
|
At the end of the period
|
1,539
|
3,304
|
During the period, a previously
hedge accounted derivative in relation to the Wells Fargo facility
was terminated. The residual balance of the derivative is recycled
to the income statement over the remaining period of the Wells
Fargo facility to July 2025.
24. Reserves
The nature and purpose of each of the reserves
included within equity at 30 June 2024 are as follows:
· Share premium
reserve: represents the surplus of the gross proceeds of share
issues over the nominal value of the shares, net of the direct
costs of equity issues
· Cash flow hedge
reserve: represents cumulative gains or losses, net of tax, on
effective cash flow hedging instruments
· Capital reduction
reserve: represents a distributable reserve created following a
Court approved reduction in capital less dividends paid
· Retained earnings
represent cumulative net gains and losses recognised in the
statement
of comprehensive income.
· Other reserves
represents cumulative gains or losses, net of tax, of foreign
currency exchange rate differences recognised in a period as other
comprehensive income.
The only movements in these reserves during the year
are disclosed in the consolidated statement of changes in
equity.
25. Capital commitments
The Group had no capital commitments outstanding as at
30 June 2024 and 30 June 2023.
26. Operating leases
The Group's principal assets are investment properties
which are leased to third parties under non-cancellable operating
leases. The weighted average remaining lease term based on rental
income at 30 June 2024 is 12.4 years (2023: 13.6 years). The leases
contain predominately fixed or inflation-linked uplifts.
The future minimum lease payments receivable under the
Group's leases, are as follows:
|
As at
30 June 2024
£'000
|
As at
30 June 2023
£'000
|
Year 1
|
112,127
|
100,156
|
Year 2
|
111,887
|
98,941
|
Year 3
|
111,048
|
98,614
|
Year 4
|
108,241
|
97,552
|
Year 5
|
106,936
|
97,177
|
Year 6-10
|
475,626
|
452,219
|
Year 11-15
|
281,725
|
310,150
|
Year 16-20
|
62,285
|
94,875
|
Year 21-25
|
20,626
|
23,358
|
More than 25 years
|
9,998
|
12,743
|
Total
|
1,400,499
|
1,385,785
|
27. Net asset value per share
NAV per share is calculated by dividing the Group's
net assets as shown in the consolidated statement of financial
position, by the number of ordinary shares outstanding at the end
of the year. As there are no dilutive instruments outstanding,
basic and diluted NAV per share are identical.
The Group uses EPRA Net Tangible Assets as the most
meaningful measure of long-term performance and the measure which
is being adopted by the majority of UK REITs, establishing it as
the industry standard benchmark. It excludes items that are
considered to have no impact in the long-term, such as the fair
value of derivatives.
NAV and EPRA NTA per share calculation are as
follows:
|
As at
30 June 2024
£'000
|
As at
30 June 2023
£'000
|
Net assets per the consolidated statement of
financial position
|
1,119,474
|
1,217,726
|
Fair value of financial assets at
amortised cost
|
(3,493)
|
(3,609)
|
Fair value of interest rate derivatives
|
(31,449)
|
(57,583)
|
EPRA NTA
|
1,084,532
|
1,156,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares in issue at 30 June
|
1,246,239,185
|
1,246,239,185
|
NAV per share - Basic and diluted (pence)
|
90p
|
98p
|
EPRA NTA per share (pence)
|
87p
|
93p
|
28. Transactions with related parties
Details of the related parties to the Group in the
year and the transactions with these related parties were as
follows:
a. Directors
Directors' fees
The table below shows the fees per
annum for the roles performed by the Board for the year ended 30
June 2024:
Role
|
Jon
Austen
|
Frances
Davies
|
Nick
Hewson
|
Vince
Prior
|
Sapna
Shah
|
Cathryn
Vanderspar
|
|
Chair of Board of
Directors
|
-
|
-
|
£75,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Director
|
£52,500
|
£52,500
|
-
|
£52,500
|
£52,500
|
£52,500
|
|
Audit and Risk Committee
Chair
|
£9,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Nomination Committee
Chair*
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
£4,000
|
£4,000
|
-
|
|
Senior Independent
Director*
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
£5,000
|
£5,000
|
-
|
|
Remuneration Committee
Chair
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
£5,000
|
|
ESG Committee Chair
|
-
|
£5,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Management Engagement
Committee Chair*
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
£5,000
|
£5,000
|
-
|
|
*From 21 May 2024, Sapna Shah became Senior
Independent Director and Nomination Committee Chair in place of
Vince Prior. Vince Prior became Management Engagement Committee
Chair in place of Sapna Shah.
The table below shows the total fees
received by each member of the Board for the year ended 30 June
2024:
|
Year to
30 June 2024
£'000
|
Year to
30 June 2023 £'000
|
Nick Hewson
|
75
|
75
|
Jon Austen
|
62
|
62
|
Vince Prior
|
61
|
62
|
Cathryn Vanderspar
|
58
|
58
|
Frances Davies
|
58
|
58
|
Sapna Shah*
|
58
|
18
|
* Appointed 1 March 2023
The total remuneration payable to the Directors in
respect of the current year and previous year are disclosed in note
8.
Directors' interests
Details of the direct and indirect interests of the
Directors and their close families in the ordinary shares of one
pence each in the Company at 30 June 2024 and at the date of the
signing of the accounts were as follows:
· Nick Hewson:
1,330,609 shares (0.11% of issued share capital)
· Jon Austen: 305,339
shares (0.02% of issued share capital)
· Vince Prior: 213,432
shares (0.02% of issued share capital)
· Cathryn Vanderspar:
125,802 shares (0.01% of issued share capital)
· Frances Davies:
36,774 shares (0.00% of issued share capital)
· Sapna Shah: 70,081
shares (0.01% of issued share capital)
b. Investment Adviser
Investment advisory and accounting
fees
The investment adviser to the Group, Atrato Capital
Limited (the "Investment Adviser"), is entitled to certain advisory
fees under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement (the
"Agreement") dated 14 July 2021.
The entitlement of the Investment Adviser to advisory
fees is by way of what are termed 'Monthly Management Fees' and
'Semi-Annual Management Fees' both of which are calculated by
reference to the net asset value of the Group at particular dates,
as adjusted for the financial impact of certain investment events
and after deducting any uninvested proceeds from share issues up to
the date of the calculation of the relevant fee (these adjusted
amounts are referred to as 'Adjusted Net Asset Value' for the
purpose of calculation of the fees in accordance with the
Agreement).
Until the Adjusted Net Value of the Group exceeds
£1,500 million, the entitlements to advisory fees can be summarised
as follows:
· Monthly Management Fee
payable monthly in arrears: 1/12th of 0.7125% per calendar month of
Adjusted Net Asset Value up to or equal to £500 million, 1/12th of
0.5625% per calendar month of Adjusted Net Asset Value above £500
million and up to or equal to £1,000 million and 1/12th
of 0.4875% per calendar month of Adjusted Net Asset Value above
£1,000 and up to or equal to £1,500 million.
· Semi-Annual
Management Fee payable semi-annually in arrears: 0.11875% of
Adjusted Net Asset Value up to or equal to £500 million, 0.09375%
of Adjusted Net Asset Value above £500 million and up to or equal
to £1,000 million and 0.08125% of Adjusted Net Asset Value above
£1,000 million and up to or equal to £1,500 million.
For the year to 30 June 2024 the total advisory fees
payable to the Investment Adviser were £9,472,218 (2023:
£10,292,302) of which £1,745,960 (2023: £1,845,144) is included in
trade and other payables in the consolidated statement of financial
position as at 30 June 2024.
The Investment Adviser is also entitled to an annual
accounting and administration service fee equal to: £54,107; plus
(i) £4,386 for any indirect subsidiary of the Company and (ii)
£1,702 for each direct subsidiary of the Company. A full list of
the Company and its direct and indirect subsidiary undertakings is
listed in Note 14 of this financial information.
For the year to 30 June 2024 the total accounting and
administration service fee payable to the Investment Adviser was
£363,869 (2023: £297,475) of which £91,950 (2023: £83,614) is
included in trade and other payables in the consolidated statement
of financial position as at 30 June 2024.
Introducer Services
Atrato Partners, an affiliate of the Investment
Adviser, is entitled to fees in relation to the successful
introduction of prospective investors in connection with
subscriptions for ordinary share capital in
the Company.
The entitlement of the Investment Adviser to
introducer fees is by fees and/or commission which can be
summarised as follows:
· Commission basis: 1%
of total subscription in respect of ordinary shares subscribed
for
by any prospective investor introduced by Atrato Partners.
For the year to 30 June 2024 the total introducer fees
payable to the affiliate of the Investment Adviser were £nil (2023:
£nil).
Interest in shares of the
Company
Details of the direct and indirect interests of the
Directors of the Investment Adviser and their close families in the
ordinary shares of one pence each in the Company at 30 June 2024
were as follows:
· Ben Green: 2,337,286
shares (0.19% of issued share capital)
· Steve Windsor:
1,764,679 shares (0.14% of issued share capital)
· Steven Noble: 246,885
shares (0.02% of issued share capital)
· Natalie Markham:
71,039 shares (0.01% of issued share capital)
On 9 September 2024, the Company
announced that Steven Noble stepped down as Chief Investment
Officer of the Company's Investment Adviser, Atrato Capital
Limited.
Charitable
donations
The Company approved a policy to make charitable
donations of £150,000 per annum. During the year £120,000 was
approved by the Board and paid post year end (2023: Nil). The
donations will be made to the Atrato Foundation, a corporate
charity registered with the Charity Commission and Companies House,
whose Trustees are Lara Townsend (COO of the Investment Adviser)
and Natalie Markham (CFO of the Investment Adviser). The donations
will be made in the form of a restricted grant, the funds will be
directed to charitable causes specified by the Board of the
Company. For further information on the Company's charitable
activities, please refer to page 11.
29. Subsequent events
Debt financing
· In July
2024, the Group announced the arrangement of a new £100.0 million
facility with ING bank at a margin of 1.55% over SONIA. The
facility comprises a £75.0 million term loan and a £25.0 million
revolving credit facility. The term of the loan is for three-years
with two further one-year extension options.
· In July
2024, the Group announced the completed an agreement with a group
of institutional investors for a private placement of €83.0 million
of new senior unsecured notes. The notes have a term of 7 years and
a fixed rate coupon of 4.4%.
· In August
2024, the Deka facility of £96.6 million matured and was settled
with the proceeds of the new ING facility.
COMPANY STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
As at 30 June 2024
Registered number: 10799126
|
Notes
|
As at
30 June 2024
£'000
|
As at
30 June 2023
£'000
|
Non-current
assets
|
|
|
|
Investments in subsidiaries
|
D
|
1,139,114
|
1,564,226
|
Intercompany receivables
|
D
|
491,566
|
-
|
Interest rate derivatives
|
|
14,312
|
29,318
|
Total non-current
assets
|
|
1,644,992
|
1,593,544
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
|
|
Interest rate derivatives
|
|
13,258
|
13,397
|
Trade and other receivables
|
E
|
4,013
|
11,412
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
382
|
2,928
|
Total current
assets
|
|
17,653
|
27,737
|
Total
assets
|
|
1,662,645
|
1,621,281
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
Bank Borrowings
|
G
|
-
|
61,856
|
Trade and other payables
|
F
|
227,194
|
127,027
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
227,194
|
188,883
|
Non-Current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
Bank borrowings
|
G
|
412,533
|
315,873
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
639,727
|
504,756
|
Total net
assets
|
|
1,022,918
|
1,116,525
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
Share capital
|
H
|
12,462
|
12,462
|
Share premium reserve
|
|
500,386
|
500,386
|
Capital reduction reserve
|
|
629,196
|
704,531
|
Retained earnings
|
|
(119,126)
|
(100,854)
|
Total
equity
|
|
1,022,918
|
1,116,525
|
The notes on pages 140 to 141 form
part of these financial statements.
The Company has taken advantage of
the exemption within section 408 of the Companies Act 2006 not to
present its own profit and loss account. The accumulated loss for
the year dealt with the financial statements of the Company
was £18,272,000 (2023:
loss £164,541,000).
As at 30 June 2024 the Company has distributable reserves
of £510.0 million (2023:
£603.7
million).
The Company financial statements
were approved and authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on
17 September 2024 and were signed on its behalf by
Nick Hewson (Chair).
COMPANY STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the year ended 30 June
2024
|
Share capital £'000
|
Share premium reserve
£'000
|
Capital reduction reserve
£'000
|
Retained earnings £'000
|
Total £'000
|
As at 1 July
2023
|
12,462
|
500,386
|
704,531
|
(100,854)
|
1,116,525
|
Loss and total comprehensive loss for the year
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(18,272)
|
(18,272)
|
Transactions with owners
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interim dividends paid
|
-
|
-
|
(75,335)
|
-
|
(75,335)
|
As at 30 June
2024
|
12,462
|
500,386
|
629,196
|
(119,126)
|
1,022,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at 1 July
2022
|
12,399
|
494,174
|
778,859
|
63,687
|
1,349,119
|
Loss and total comprehensive loss for the year
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(164,541)
|
(164,541)
|
Transactions with owners
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares issued at a premium during the
year
|
63
|
6,301
|
-
|
-
|
6,364
|
Transfer to capital reduction reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share issue costs
|
-
|
(89)
|
-
|
-
|
(89)
|
Interim dividends paid
|
-
|
-
|
(74,328)
|
-
|
(74,328)
|
As at 30 June
2023
|
12,462
|
500,386
|
704,531
|
(100,854)
|
1,116,525
|
NOTES TO THE COMPANY
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
A. Basis of preparation
The Company's financial statements have been prepared
in accordance with FRS 102, the Financial Reporting Standard
applicable in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland.
The principal accounting policies relevant to the
Company are as follows:
· Investments in
subsidiaries are recognised at cost less provision for any
impairment
· Loans and receivables are
recognised initially at fair value plus transaction costs less
provision for impairment
· Trade payables are
recognised initially at fair value and subsequently at amortised
cost
· Equity instruments
are recognised as the value of proceeds received net of direct
issue
costs
· Dividends are
recognised as a financial liability and deduction from equity in
the period in which they are declared
In preparing the Company's financial statements,
advantage has been taken of the following disclosure exemptions
available in FRS 102:
· No cash flow
statement has been presented
· Disclosures in
respect of the Company's financial instruments have not been
presented as equivalent disclosures have been provided in respect
of the Group
· No reconciliation of
the number of shares outstanding at the beginning and end of the
year has been presented as it is identical to the reconciliation
for the Group shown in note 22
to the Group financial statements
· No disclosure has
been given for the aggregate remuneration of the key management
personnel of the Company as their remuneration is shown in note 8
to the Group
financial statements
In the year to 30 June 2024, the Company intends to
continue to use these disclosure exemptions unless objections are
received from Shareholders.
B. Significant accounting judgements, estimates and
assumptions
In preparing the financial statements of the Company,
the Directors have made the following judgements:
· Determine whether there are
any indicators of impairment of the investments in subsidiary
undertakings. Factors taken into consideration in reaching such a
decision include the financial position and expected future
performance of the subsidiary entity. Where indicators of
impairment are identified the carrying value of investments in
subsidiaries will be compared to their recoverable amount and an
impairment charge recognised where this is lower than carrying
value. The net asset value of the individual subsidiary entities is
considered to be a reasonable proxy for fair value less costs to
sell as the underlying investment properties held within these
entities is carried at fair value.
C. Auditor's remuneration
The remuneration of the auditor in respect of the
audit of the Company's consolidated and individual financial
statements for the year was £292,150 (2023: £260,000). Fees payable
for audit and non-audit services provided to the Company and the
rest of the Group are disclosed in note 7 to the Group financial
statements.
D. Investment in subsidiary undertakings
The Company's wholly owned direct subsidiaries are
Supermarket Income Investments UK Limited, Supermarket Income
Investments (Midco2) UK Limited, Supermarket Income Investments
(Midco3) UK Limited, Supermarket Income Investments (Midco4) UK
Limited, SII UK Halliwell (Midco) Limited, Supermarket Income
Investments (Midco 6) UK Limited , Supermarket Income Investments
(Midco7) UK Limited, Supermarket Income Investments (Midco 8), SUPR
Finco Limited and SUPR Green Energy Limited all of which are
incorporated and operating in England with a registered address of
The Scalpel 18th Floor, 52 Lime Street, London, United Kingdom,
EC3M 7AF. The full list of subsidiary entities directly and
indirectly owned by the Company is disclosed in note 14 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
The movement in the year was as follows:
|
Year to
30 June 2024
£'000
|
Opening
balance
|
1,564,226
|
Additions
|
1
|
Disposals
|
(359,865)
|
Closing
balance
|
1,204,362
|
Impairments of investments in subsidiaries
|
(65,248)
|
As at 30 June
2024
|
1,139,114
|
Non-current loans receivable
|
491,566
|
Closing balance as
at 30 June 2024
|
1,630,680
|
During the year a number of the Company's subsidiaries
undertook buybacks of their own shares. The proceeds of these
buybacks were left outstanding as intercompany loans provided by
the Company to the respective subsidiaries. These transactions are
responsible for the increase in the Company's intercompany loan
receivable balance as at 30 June 2024.
|
Year to
30 June 2023
£'000
|
Opening
balance
|
1,329,108
|
Additions
|
1,066,634
|
Closing
balance
|
2,395,742
|
Impairments of investments in subsidiaries
|
(831,516)
|
As at 30 June
2023
|
1,564,226
|
An impairment of investments in subsidiaries was
recognised during both the current and previous year following the
payment of upstream dividends to the Company. Following the payment
of dividends, the net assets of certain dividend
paying subsidiaries no longer support the carrying value of the
Company's investment in those entities and thus an
impairment charge was recognised to bring the carrying value
of the investments in line with the recoverable
amount, which was also considered to be its value in
use.
E. Trade and other receivables
|
As at
30 June 2024
£'000
|
As at
30 June 2023
£'000
|
Intercompany receivables
|
3,645
|
9,345
|
Prepayments and accrued income
|
209
|
223
|
VAT receivable
|
159
|
-
|
Other receivables
|
-
|
1,844
|
Total trade and
other receivables
|
4,013
|
11,412
|
F. Trade and other
payables
|
|
|
Trade creditors
|
2,120
|
2,235
|
Corporate accruals
|
6,491
|
5,122
|
VAT payable
|
-
|
114
|
Intercompany payables
|
218,583
|
119,556
|
Total trade and
other payables
|
227,194
|
127,027
|
G. Bank Borrowings
|
As at
30 June 2024 £'000
|
As at
30 June 2023
£'000
|
Amounts falling due within one year:
|
|
|
Unsecured debt
|
-
|
62,090
|
Less: Unamortised finance costs
|
-
|
(234)
|
Bank borrowings per
the Company's statement of financial position
|
-
|
61,856
|
Amounts falling due
after more than one year:
|
|
|
Unsecured debt
|
414,981
|
318,508
|
Less: Unamortised finance costs
|
(2,448)
|
(2,635)
|
Bank borrowings per
the Company's statement of financial position
|
412,533
|
315,873
|
Total bank
borrowings
|
412,533
|
377,729
|
Any associated fees in arranging the bank borrowings
that are unamortised as at the end of the year are offset against
amounts drawn under the facility as shown in the table above.
Details of the bank borrowings of the Company are
disclosed in note 19 to the Group financial statements.
H. Share capital
Details of the share capital of the Company are
disclosed in note 22 to the Group financial statements.
I. Related party transactions
Details of related party transactions are disclosed in
note 28 to the Group financial statements.
Notes to EPRA and other Key Performance
Indicators
1. EPRA
Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per Share
For the period from 1 July 2023 to 30 June 2024
|
Net profit attributable
to ordinary Shareholders
£'000
|
Weighted average number of ordinary
shares1
Number
|
Earnings/
per share
Pence
|
Net (loss) attributable to ordinary Shareholders
|
(21,184)
|
1,246,239,185
|
(1.7)
|
Adjustments to
remove:
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value of investment properties and
associated rent guarantees
|
65,825
|
|
5.3
|
Changes in fair value of interest rate derivatives
measured at FVTPL
|
31,251
|
|
2.5
|
Deferred Tax
|
(140)
|
|
-
|
Finance income received on interest rate derivatives
held at fair value through profit and loss
|
(22,469)
|
|
(1.8)
|
EPRA
earnings
|
53,283
|
1,246,239,185
|
4.3
|
Add finance income received on interest rate
derivatives held at fair value through profit and loss
|
22,469
|
|
1.8
|
Add accelerated finance costs
|
70
|
|
-
|
Adjusted EPRA
earnings
|
75,822
|
1,246,239,185
|
6.1
|
1 Based on the weighted average number of
ordinary shares in issue in the year ended 30 June 2024.
For the period from 1 July 2022 to 30 June 2023
|
Net profit attributable
to ordinary Shareholders
£'000
|
Weighted average number of ordinary
shares1
Number
|
Earnings/
per share
Pence
|
Net (loss) attributable to ordinary Shareholders
|
(144,866)
|
1,242,574,505
|
(11.7)
|
Adjustments to
remove:
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value of investment properties and
associated rent guarantees
|
256,066
|
-
|
20.6
|
Changes in fair value of interest rate derivatives
measured at FVTPL
|
(10,024)
|
-
|
(0.8)
|
Profit on disposal of interest rate derivatives
|
(2,878)
|
-
|
(0.2)
|
Group share of changes in fair value of joint
venture investment properties
|
(11,486)
|
-
|
(0.9)
|
Profit on disposal of groups interest in joint
venture
|
(19,940)
|
-
|
(1.6)
|
Finance income received on interest rate derivatives
held at fair value through profit and loss
|
(9,671)
|
-
|
(0.8)
|
EPRA
earnings
|
57,201
|
1,242,574,505
|
4.6
|
Add finance income received on interest rate
derivatives held at fair value through profit and loss
|
9,671
|
-
|
0.8
|
Add accelerated finance costs
|
1,518
|
-
|
0.1
|
Add Joint Venture acquisition loan arrangement
fee
|
4,009
|
-
|
0.3
|
Adjusted EPRA
earnings
|
72,399
|
1,242,574,505
|
5.8
|
2 Based on the
weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue in the year
ended 30 June 2023.
2. EPRA NTA per share
EPRA NTA is considered to be the most relevant measure
for the Group and is now the primary measure of net assets,
replacing the previously reported EPRA Net Asset Value metric. For
the current period EPRA NTA is calculated as net assets per the
consolidated statement of financial position excluding the fair
value of interest rate derivatives.
30 June 2024
|
EPRA NTA
£'000
|
EPRA NRV
£'000
|
EPRA NDV £'000
|
IFRS NAV
attributable to ordinary Shareholders
|
1,119,474
|
1,119,474
|
1,119,474
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of Financial asset held at amortised
cost
|
(3,493)
|
(3,493)
|
(3,493)
|
Fair value of interest rate derivatives
|
(31,449)
|
(31,449)
|
-
|
Purchasers' costs
|
-
|
120,239
|
-
|
Fair value of debt
|
-
|
-
|
149
|
EPRA
metric
|
1,084,532
|
1,204,771
|
1,116,130
|
EPRA metric per
share
|
87p
|
97p
|
90p
|
|
|
|
|
30 June 2023
|
EPRA NTA
£'000
|
EPRA NRV
£'000
|
EPRA NDV £'000
|
IFRS NAV
attributable to ordinary Shareholders
|
1,217,726
|
1,217,726
|
1,217,726
|
Fair value of interest rate derivatives
|
(3,609)
|
(3,609)
|
(3,609)
|
Fair value of Financial asset held at amortised
cost
|
(57,583)
|
(57,583)
|
-
|
Intangibles
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Purchasers' costs
|
-
|
122,990
|
-
|
Fair value of debt
|
-
|
-
|
4,876
|
EPRA
metric
|
1,156,534
|
1,279,524
|
1,218,993
|
EPRA metric per
share
|
93p
|
103p
|
98p
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. EPRA Net Initial Yield (NIY) and
EPRA "topped up" NIY
|
As at
30 June 2024 £'000
|
As at
30 June 2023 £'000
|
Investment Property - wholly owned (note 13)
|
1,768,216
|
1,685,690
|
Investment Property - share of joint ventures
|
-
|
-
|
Completed Property
Portfolio
|
1,768,216
|
1,685,690
|
Allowance for estimated purchasers' costs
|
120,239
|
122,990
|
Grossed up
completed property portfolio valuation (B)
|
1,888,455
|
1,808,680
|
Annualised passing rental income - wholly owned
|
112,338
|
99,910
|
Annualised non-recoverable property outgoings
|
(1,116)
|
(1,117)
|
Annualised net
rents (A)
|
111,222
|
98,793
|
Rent expiration of rent-free periods and fixed
uplifts
|
440
|
447
|
Topped up
annualised net rents (C)
|
111,662
|
99,240
|
EPRA NIY
(A/B)
|
5.89%
|
5.46%
|
EPRA "topped up"
NIY (C/B)
|
5.91%
|
5.49%
|
All rent free periods expire within the year to 30 June
2024
4. EPRA Vacancy Rate
EPRA Vacancy Rate
|
As at
30 June 2024 £'000
|
As at
30 June 2023 £'000
|
Estimated rental value of vacant space
|
591
|
439
|
Estimated rental value of the whole portfolio
|
113,660
|
100,797
|
EPRA Vacancy
Rate
|
0.5%
|
0.4%
|
The EPRA vacancy rate is calculated as the ERV of the
unrented, lettable space as a proportion of the total rental value
of the Investment Property portfolio. This is expected to continue
to be a highly immaterial percentage as the majority of the
portfolio is let to the largest supermarket operators in the
UK.
5. EPRA Cost Ratio
|
As at
30 June 2024 £'000
|
As at
30 June 2023 £'000
|
Administration
expenses per IFRS
|
15,218
|
15,429
|
|
|
|
Service charge income
|
(6,822)
|
(5,939)
|
Service charge costs
|
7,441
|
6,518
|
Net Service charge
costs
|
619
|
579
|
Share of joint venture expenses
|
-
|
938
|
Total costs
(including direct vacant property costs) (A)
|
15,837
|
16,946
|
Vacant property costs
|
(331)
|
(328)
|
Total costs
(excluding direct vacant property costs) (B)
|
15,506
|
16,618
|
|
|
|
Gross rental income
per IFRS
|
107,851
|
95,823
|
Less: service charge components of gross rental
income
|
-
|
-
|
Add: Share of Gross rental income from Joint
Ventures
|
-
|
13,529
|
Gross rental income
(C)
|
107,851
|
109,352
|
|
|
|
EPRA Cost ratio
(including direct vacant property costs) (A/C)
|
14.7%
|
15.50%
|
EPRA Cost ratio
(excluding vacant property costs) (B/C)
|
14.4%
|
15.20%
|
1.
The Company does not have any overhead costs capitalised as it has
no assets under development.
6. EPRA LTV
|
As at
|
As at
|
|
30 June 2024
£'000
|
30 June 2023
£'000
|
Group Net Debt
|
|
|
Borrowings from financial
institutions
|
694,168
|
667,465
|
Net payables
|
34,832
|
-
|
|
|
|
Less: Cash and cash
equivalents
|
(38,691)
|
(37,481)
|
Group Net Debt Total (A)
|
690,309
|
629,984
|
Group Property Value
|
|
|
Investment properties at fair
value
|
1,768,216
|
1,685,690
|
Intangibles
|
-
|
-
|
Net receivables
|
-
|
93,620
|
Financial assets
|
11,023
|
10,819
|
Total Group Property Value (B)
|
1,779,239
|
1,790,129
|
Group LTV (A-B)
|
38.80%
|
35.19%
|
|
|
|
Share of Joint Ventures Debt
|
|
|
Bond loans
|
-
|
-
|
Net payables
|
-
|
-
|
JV Net Debt Total (A)
|
-
|
-
|
Group Property Value
|
|
|
Owner-occupied property
|
|
|
Investment properties at fair
value
|
-
|
-
|
Total JV Property Value (B)
|
-
|
-
|
JV LTV (A-B)
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
|
|
|
Combined Net Debt (A)
|
690,309
|
629,984
|
Combined Property Value
(B)
|
1,779,239
|
1,790,129
|
Combined LTV (A-B)
|
38.80%
|
35.19%
|
7. EPRA Like-for-Like Rental Growth
Sector
|
Year ended 30 June 2024
£'000
|
Year ended 30 June 2023
£'000
|
Like-for-Like rental growth
%
|
UK
|
82,003
|
80,329
|
2.1%
|
The like-for-like rental growth is based on changes in net
rental income for those properties which have been held for the
duration of both the current and comparative reporting. This
represents a portfolio valuation, as assessed by the valuer of
£1.30 billion (30 June 2023: £1.35 billion).
8. EPRA Property Related Capital
Expenditure
|
As at
|
As at
|
|
30 June 2024
£'000
|
30 June 2023
£'000
|
Group
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
145,834
|
377,311
|
Development
|
380
|
-
|
Investment properties
|
-
|
-
|
Group Total
CapEx
|
146,214
|
377,311
|
|
|
|
Joint Venture
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
-
|
-
|
Development
|
-
|
-
|
Investment properties
|
-
|
-
|
Joint Venture
CapEx
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Total CapEx
|
146,214
|
377,311
|
Acquisitions relate to purchase of investment properties in
the year and includes capitalised acquisition costs. Development
relates to capitalised costs in relation to development expenditure
on the property portfolio.
9. Total Shareholder Return
Total Shareholder Return
|
Year to
30 June 2024 Pence per share
('p')
|
Year to
30 June 2023 Pence per share
('p')
|
Share price at start of the year
|
73.00
|
119.50
|
Share price at the end of the year
|
72.50
|
73.00
|
Increase in share price
|
(0.50)
|
(46.50)
|
Dividends declared for the year
|
6.06
|
6.00
|
Increase /
(decrease) in share price plus dividends
|
5.56
|
(40.50)
|
Share price at
start of year
|
73.00
|
119.50
|
Total Shareholder Return
|
8%
|
(34%)
|
10. Net loan to value ratio
The proportion of our gross asset value that is funded
by borrowings calculated as statement of financial position
borrowings less cash balances divided by total investment
properties valuation.
Net loan to value
|
As at
30 June 2024 £'000
|
As at
30 June 2023 £'000
|
Bank borrowings
|
694,168
|
667,465
|
Less cash and cash equivalents
|
(38,691)
|
(37,481)
|
Net borrowings
|
655,477
|
629,984
|
Investment properties valuation
|
1,768,216
|
1,685,690
|
Net loan to value
ratio
|
37%
|
37%
|
11. Annualised passing rent
Annualised passing rent is the
annualised cash rental income being received as at the stated
date.
GLOSSARY
AGM
|
Annual
General Meeting
|
AIFMD
|
Alternative Investment Fund
Managers Directive
|
EPRA
|
European Public Real Estate
Association
|
EPS
|
Earnings per share,
calculated as the profit for the period after tax attributable to
members of the parent company divided by the weighted average
number of shares in issue in the period
|
FCA
|
Financial Conduct Authority
of the United Kingdom
|
FRI
|
A lease granted on an FRI
basis means that all repairing and insuring obligations are imposed
on the tenant, relieving the landlord from all liability for the
cost of insurance and repairs
|
IFRS
|
UK adopted international
accounting standards
|
IPO
|
An initial public offering
(IPO) refers to the process of offering shares of
a corporation to the public
in a new stock issuance
|
LSE
|
London Stock Exchange
|
LTV
|
Loan to Value: the
outstanding amount of a loan as a percentage of property value
|
NAV
|
Net Asset Value
|
Net Initial Yield
|
Annualised net rents on
investment properties as a percentage of the investment property
valuation, less assumed purchaser's costs of 6.8%
|
Net Loan to Value
or Net LTV
|
LTV calculated on the gross
loan amount less cash balances
|
Omnichannel
|
Stores offering both
instore picking and online fulfilment
|
REIT
|
Real Estate Investment
Trust
|
Running yield
|
The anticipated Net Initial
Yield at a future date, taking account of any rent reviews in the
intervening period
|
Sainsbury's
Reversion Portfolio (SRP)
|
A portfolio consisting of
the freehold interest in 26 geographically diverse high quality
Sainsbury's supermarkets
|
Total Shareholder Return (TSR)
|
The movement in share price
over a period plus dividends declared for
the same period expressed
as a percentage of the share price at the start
of the Period
|
WAULT
|
Weighted Average Unexpired
Lease Term. It is used by property companies as an indicator of the
average remaining life of the leases within their portfolios
|
CONTACTS INFORMATION
Directors
|
Nick Hewson (Non-Executive Chair)
Vince Prior (Chair of Management
Engagement Committee)
Jon Austen (Chair of Audit and Risk
Committee)
Cathryn Vanderspar (Chair of
Remuneration Committee)
Frances Davies (Chair of ESG
Committee)
Sapna Shah (Chair of Nomination
Committee & Senior Independent Director)
|
Company Secretary
|
Hanway Advisory Limited
The Scalpel 18th Floor, 52
Lime Street, London, United Kingdom, EC3M 7AF
|
Registrar
|
Link Asset Services
The Registry, 34 Beckenham
Road, Beckenham,
Kent, BR3 4TU
|
AIFM
|
JTC Global AIFM Solutions Limited
Ground floor, Dorey Court,
Admiral Park, St Peter Port, Guernsey, Channel Islands, GY1 2HT
|
Investment Adviser
|
Atrato Capital Limited
3rd Floor, 10 Bishops
Square, London E1 6EG
|
Financial adviser,
Joint Corporate Broker and Placing
Agent
|
Stifel Nicolaus Europe Limited
150 Cheapside, London, EC2V
6ET
|
|
|
Joint Corporate Broker
|
Goldman Sachs
International
Plumtree Court, 25 Shoe
Lane, London, EC4A 4AU
|
Auditors
|
BDO LLP
55 Baker Street, London,
W1U 7EU
|
Property Valuers
|
Cushman & Wakefield
125 Old Broad Street,
London, EC2N 1AR
|
Financial PR Advisers
|
FTI
200 Aldersgate Street,
London, EC1A 4HD
|
Website
|
www.supermarketincomereit.com
|
Registered Office
|
The Scalpel 18th Floor, 52
Lime Street, London, EC3M 7AF
|
Stock exchange ticker ISIN
|
SUPR
GB00BF345X11
|
This report will be
available on the Company's website.