Zinnwald
Lithium plc / EPIC: ZNWD.L / Market: AIM / Sector:
Mining
21 February 2024
Zinnwald Lithium plc
("Zinnwald Lithium" or the "Company")
445% Increase in Mineral
Resource Estimate
Zinnwald Lithium Project
established as the second largest hard rock lithium project in the
EU
Zinnwald Lithium plc, the European
focused lithium company, is pleased to announce the publication of
an updated independent Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") for its
100% owned Zinnwald lithium project ("Zinnwald" or the "Project")
located in Saxony, eastern Germany.
The 2024 MRE update incorporates
26,911 metres of new diamond core drilling across 84 drill holes
and a reinterpreted and updated geological model since the previous
MRE which was released in September 2018.
In addition to the high-grade
greisen mineralisation, focus of the recent 2022/2023 drilling was
the lithium mineralisation hosted by the broader zone of altered
albite granite, which includes internal lenses of higher-grade
greisen. The inclusion of this mineralised zone allows for a higher
production rate and a potential optimisation of overall project
economics.
2024 Resource Highlights:
·
A 445 % increase in tonnes and a 243% increase in
contained lithium ("Li") in the Measured and Indicated category
versus the previous 2018 MRE.
·
Total contained Li of 429kt compared with the 2018
MRE of 125kt in the Measured and Indicated category.
·
11.3 Mt grading 3,420ppm Li (0.736%
Li2O) in the Measured category.
·
193.5 Mt grading 2,220ppm Li (0.478%
Li2O) in the Measured and Indicated category.
·
33.3 Mt grading 2,140 ppm Li (0.461%
Li2O) in the Inferred category.
·
Increase in overall tonnage predominantly due to
the incorporation of a broad zone of mineralised granite, as well
as contribution of an extra 26,911 metres of new drilling over 84
holes.
·
Measured classification only applied to the
external greisen domains due to a higher metallurgical confidence;
Snowden Optiro recommends further metallurgical variability
testwork in the broad mineralisation zone domain to further
increase confidence.
·
Demonstrated dimensions of the mineralised zone
(true thickness c. 80 metres) and continuity of ore supports highly
efficient mining methods with minimal waste rock
production.
·
Mineral Resources reported using a 1,100ppm Li
cutoff grade and a stope optimisation to constrain
an RPEEE Resource.
Zinnwald Lithium CEO, Anton du Plessis,
commented: "We are delighted to be able to announce a
substantial increase of our Mineral Resource at the Zinnwald
Project with a 3.4x increase in contained lithium in the Measured
and Indicated categories. This establishes the Project as the
second largest hard rock lithium project by both resource size and
contained lithium in the EU and clearly highlights its scale and
strategic importance.
"The inclusion of the mineralised granite in the resource and
ultimately the mine plan will allow more efficient bulk underground
mining techniques with the potential to meaningfully increase the
lithium production from what was contemplated in the PEA published
in 2022."
Detailed Information
The following statement of Mineral
Resources has been prepared in accordance with National Instrument
43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects of the Canadian
Securities Administrators ("NI 43-101") by independent consulting
firm Snowden Optiro Ltd ("Datamine International") of Bristol,
United Kingdom.
Table 1.1
Mineral Resource Statement for Zinnwald Lithium Project, effective
20th February 2024.
Classification
|
Domain
|
Tonnes
|
Mean Grade
|
Contained Metal
|
(Mt)
|
Li (ppm)
|
Li2O (%)
|
Li (kt)
|
LCE (kt)
|
Measured
|
External Greisen
(1)
|
11.3
|
3,420
|
0.736
|
39
|
206
|
Mineralised Zone
(2)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Internal
Greisen
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Mineralised
Granite
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
SubTotal (1) and
(2)
|
11.3
|
3,420
|
0.736
|
39
|
206
|
Indicated
|
External Greisen
(1)
|
2.1
|
3,510
|
0.756
|
7
|
40
|
Mineralised Zone
(2)
|
180.0
|
2,120
|
0.456
|
383
|
2,037
|
Internal
Greisen
|
14.6
|
3,320
|
0.715
|
49
|
259
|
Mineralised
Granite
|
165.4
|
2,020
|
0.435
|
334
|
1,778
|
SubTotal (1) and
(2)
|
182.2
|
2,140
|
0.461
|
390
|
2,077
|
Measured + Indicated
SubTotal
|
193.5
|
2,220
|
0.478
|
429
|
2,283
|
Inferred
|
External Greisen
(1)
|
0.8
|
3,510
|
0.756
|
3
|
15
|
Mineralised Zone
(2)
|
32.5
|
2,110
|
0.454
|
68
|
364
|
Internal
Greisen
|
0.6
|
2,880
|
0.620
|
2
|
9
|
Mineralised
Granite
|
31.9
|
2,090
|
0.450
|
67
|
355
|
SubTotal (1) and
(2)
|
33.3
|
2,140
|
0.461
|
71
|
379
|
Notes
§ Mineral
Resource statement has an effective date of 20th
February 2024.
§ A Mineral
Resource is reported using a cut-off grade of 1,100 ppm Li, which
was calculated using the following assumptions: lithium hydroxide
monohydrate price USD 23,800 /t, operating costs of USD $ 121.5/ t
ROM; Li recovery of 69%; mining dilution and recovery of
10%.
§ The requirement
of a reasonable prospect of eventual economic extraction is met by
having a minimum modelling width for mineralized zones, a cut-off
grade based on reasonable inputs and an economic binding volume
that lends itself to a potential scenario of underground extraction
for undiluted in-situ resources.
§ The Mineral
Resource is reported at a minimum of 20m below historical
underground mine workings (to avoid historic underground workings),
and within Germany only.
§ All tonnages
reported are dry metric tonnes.
§ Minor
discrepancies may occur due to rounding and use of appropriate
significant figures.
§ LCE (lithium
carbonate equivalent) calculation used - 5.323 x Li metal. LiOH*H2O
(lithium hydroxide monohydrate) calculation used - 6.045 x Li
Metal.
§ Mineral
resources which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated
economic viability. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level
of confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource
and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably
expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be
upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued
exploration.
§ The results
from the stope optimization are used solely for the purpose of
testing the "reasonable prospects for economic extraction" by
underground methods and do not represent an attempt to estimate
mineral reserves. There are no mineral reserves reported in this NI
43-101 resource update. The results are used as a guide to assist
in the preparation of a Mineral Resource statement and to select an
appropriate resource reporting cut-off grade. Stope optimisation
does not represent an economic study.
§ The estimate of
Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental,
permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or
other relevant issues.
§ The Author is
not aware of any known mining, processing, metallurgical,
environmental, infrastructure, economic, permitting, legal, title,
taxation, socio-political, or marketing issues, or any other
relevant factors, that could materially affect the current Mineral
Resource Estimate.
Mineral Resource Estimate
Zinnwald Lithium has recently
completed an infill drilling campaign in order to increase
confidence in the geological block model and to produce an updated
MRE. This update to the MRE has been completed in conjunction with
other technical work contributing to an updated feasibility
study.
This MRE required a reinterpretation
and an updated geological model in order to represent the
geological and mineralogical domains that have been defined by the
most recent drilling campaign undertaken by the Company during 2022
and 2023. The geological model includes mineralisation domains that
are represented by the higher grade greisens "external", as well as
a broader zone of lithium mineralisation contained within a
mineralised albite lithium mica granite and "internal" higher grade
greisens. The higher-grade external greisens are narrow in places
but can reach up to 40 metres in true thickness, they outcrop above
the mineralised zone of granite and internal greisens, with a
typical separation but variable distance of approximately 10
metres. The broader mineralised zone has an average true thickness
of approximately 80 metres and contains lenses of greisen that
locally exhibit higher grades of lithium mineralisation. Both the
mineralisation zone and the greisens mirror the strike and dip of
the host rock intrusion- the albite granite, as is typical of many
greisen related roof zone deposits.
Lithium mineralisation within all
geological domains is hosted exclusively by polylithionite micas,
or better known as "zinnwaldite" type micas.
Lithium has been estimated using
ordinary kriging methods and density using simple kriging methods.
Estimation has honoured the hard boundaries of the external
greisens, internal greisens and mineralised granite domains, as
well as using a dynamic anisotropic search method to honour the
varying dip and dip directions of all estimation domains
(Figure 1.2,
Figure 1.3 and
Figure 1.4).
This updated MRE differs from the
previous MRE, completed in 2018, by incorporating the broader
mineralised zone. The incorporation of the mineralised zone has
allowed for a higher production rate and a reduction in unit
processing costs.
Figure 1.2 - 3D view looking north
west. Updated resource block model showing distribution of lithium
metal (Li_ppm) grades
Block model showing lithium (Li_ppm) grade
distribution.
Figure
1.3 - North-South long
section through the resource block model.
Block model showing lithium (Li_ppm) grade
distribution, red line denotes reportable limit as defined by a
20-metre safety pillar below historical mine workings, black line
denotes topography.
Figure
1.4 - West-East cross
section through the resource block model.
Block model showing lithium (Li_ppm) grade
distribution, red line denotes reportable limit as defined by a
20-metre safety pillar below historical mine workings, black line
denotes topography.
Classification
Snowden Optiro has taken multiple
factors into account when considering classification:
·
Drillhole spacing
·
Geological model confidence
·
Mineralisation continuity
·
Metallurgical confidence
·
Estimation pass
·
Mineralisation thickness
The classification criteria for the
resource are as follows:
·
Measured: External greisen
units, below the 20 metre safety buffer, showing consistently
mineralised zones supported by several drilling intersections at a
spacing of approximately 80 metres. This corresponds to parts
of the model where the geo-metallurgical behaviour is well
understood, and the mineralisation shows suitable continuity.
The classification does not include any extrapolated material
beyond appropriately spaced drillholes and must be estimated in the
first search pass.
·
Indicated: External greisen
units and the mineralisation zone, below the 20 metre safety
buffer, supported by drilling intersections on a spacing of 80-120
metres. The classification does not include any extrapolated
material beyond appropriately spaced drillholes and must be
estimated in the first search pass.
·
Inferred: External greisen
units and the mineralisation zone, below the 20 metre safety
buffer, supported by wider-spaced drilling. This corresponds
to less certainty in geological / mineralisation continuity and
consists of material estimated in the first and second pass and
extrapolated beyond drillholes at the periphery of the model up to
half drillhole spacing.
It is the opinion of Snowden Optiro
that given the metallurgical understanding of the mineralisation
zone of the albite granite, it would not be appropriate to apply a
classification of higher confidence than Indicated to the broad
mineralisation zone. Snowden Optiro considers that due to lower
mineralogical variability within the high grade greisens, and
greater metallurgical test work coverage, portions of the
high-grade greisen can be classified as Measured. Snowden
Optiro has recommended to Zinnwald Lithium that a geo-metallurgical
testwork program be undertaken to provide a higher level of
confidence in the Mineral Resource within the broader
mineralisation zone. Snowden Optiro has provided Zinnwald Lithium
guidance in sample selection and the metallurgical testwork
programme.
Reasonable Prospects for Eventual Economic
Extraction
NI 43-101 defines a mineral resource
as that portion of the mineral inventory that has reasonable
prospects for economic extraction ("RPEEE"). CIM Best
Practice Guidelines for estimating mineral resources require the
factors significant to project economics be current, reasonably
developed and based on generally accepted industry practice and
experience. In establishing the cut-off grade, it must
realistically reflect the location, deposit scale, continuity,
assumed mining method, metallurgical processes, costs and
reasonable long-term metal prices appropriate for the
deposit.
Key assumptions have been provided
to Snowden Optiro by Zinnwald Lithium for this MRE; these have been
adjusted in accordance with the Company's understanding of costs
associated with a higher production rate expected when mining a
greater volume of material at a lower grade. This includes
metallurgical recoveries and mineral processing costs based on the
results of ongoing metallurgical testwork.
The grade-tonnage curve in
Figure 1.5 demonstrate the
robustness of the estimation to changes in cut-off grade around the
1,100 ppm Li grade.
Figure
1.5 - Grade-tonnage
curve for the Zinnwald Lithium deposit, Measured and Indicated
only.
Comparison with Previous Estimates
The most recent MRE for the deposit
was completed on 30 September 2018 by G.E.O.S.
Ingenieurgesellschaft GmbH and was prepared using the terminology
and definitions given in the Canadian securities National
Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI
43-101"). The previous MRE focussed only on the greisens and not on
the mineralised granite. The Snowden Optiro updated MRE has
included the mineralised granite and incorporated internal greisens
within a mineralised zone. A direct comparison is provided
in Table 1.3,
noting that the mineralised zone contains greisens as defined as
type 1 in the 2018 MRE.
Table 1.3
- Comparison of the GEOS 2018 MRE with the updated
Snowden Optiro 2024 MRE
Model
|
Classification
|
Type
|
Tonnes
|
Mean Grade
|
Contained Metal
|
(Mt)
|
Li (ppm)
|
Li (kt)
|
GEOS
(2018)
|
Measured
|
External
Greisen (1)
|
18.5
|
3,630
|
67
|
|
|
Mineralised Zone (2)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Indicated
|
External
Greisen (1)
|
17
|
3,399
|
58
|
|
|
Mineralised Zone (2)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Measured
+ Indicated
|
|
35.5
|
3,519
|
125
|
|
Inferred
|
External
Greisen (1)
|
4.9
|
3,549
|
17
|
|
|
Mineralised Zone (2)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Snowden
Optiro (2024)
|
Measured
|
External
Greisen (1)
|
11.3
|
3,420
|
39
|
|
|
Mineralised Zone (2)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Indicated
|
External
Greisen (1)
|
2.1
|
3,510
|
7
|
|
|
Mineralised Zone (2)
|
180.0
|
2,120
|
383
|
|
Measured
+ Indicated
|
|
193.5
|
2,220
|
429
|
|
Inferred
|
External
Greisen (1)
|
0.8
|
3,510
|
3
|
|
|
Mineralised Zone (2)
|
32.5
|
2,110
|
68
|
Cut-off grade used for the GEOS 2018
MRE was 2,500ppm (due to lower expected processing throughputs) and
1,100ppm for the Snowden Optiro 2024 MRE.
The 2024 MRE shows a 445 % increase
in tonnage in the Measured and Indicated category over the 2018
MRE. This is predominantly due to the incorporation of the broad
mineralised zone, as well as the significant increase in drilling
meters (27,000m) and sampling intervals contributed by the
2022-2023 campaign. A slight drop in the Measured category is in
part due to the incorporation of internal greisens within the
mineralised zone, and a more appropriate classification of higher
confidence parts of the resource, taking into account, drillhole
spacing, geological model confidence, mineralogical &
metallurgical confidence and estimation quality. Snowden Optiro has
recommended to Zinnwald Lithium that further metallurgical testing
of the mineralisation zone be undertaken in order to convert parts
of the mineralised zone currently defined as Indicated.
Qualified Persons
Laurie Hassall, Senior Consultant,
MSci FIMMM '689775' FGS '1044219', of Snowden Optiro is the main
author of the 2024 MRE and is responsible for the technical
information in this announcement. Mr Hassall is a Qualified
Person under the terms of NI 43-101 and is independent of the
Company.
In accordance with the AIM Rules -
Note for Mining and Oil & Gas Companies, the information in
this announcement has been reviewed and approved by Qualified
Person EurGeol (#641) Christian Masurenko of Zinnwald Lithium,
Dipl. Geo., Member EFG, Fellow SEG
*ENDS*
For further information
visit www.zinnwaldlithium.com or
contact:
Anton du Plessis
Cherif Rifaat
|
Zinnwald Lithium plc
|
info@zinnwaldlithium.com
|
David Hart
Dan Dearden-Williams
|
Allenby Capital
(Nominated Adviser)
|
+44 (0) 20 3328 5656
|
Michael Seabrook
Adam Pollock
|
Oberon Capital Ltd
(Joint Broker)
|
+44 (0) 20 3179 5300
|
Richard Greenfield
Charles Bendon
|
Tamesis Partner LLP
(Joint Broker)
|
+44 (0) 20 3882 2868
|
Isabel de Salis
Paul Dulieu
|
St Brides Partners
(Financial PR)
|
zinnwald@stbridespartners.co.uk
|
Notes
AIM quoted Zinnwald Lithium
plc (EPIC: ZNWD.L) is focused on becoming an important
supplier of lithium hydroxide to Europe's fast-growing
battery sector. The Company owns 100% of the Zinnwald Lithium
Project in Germany, which has an approved mining licence,
is located in the
heart of Europe's chemical and automotive industries and
has the potential to be one of Europe's more advanced
battery grade lithium projects.
Glossary and definition of
terms
Title
|
Explanation
|
Cut-off grade
|
The lowest grade or quality of
mineralized material that qualifies as economically mineable and
available in a given deposit. May be defined on the basis of
economic evaluation or on physical or chemical attributes that
define an acceptable product specification.
|
Indicated Mineral Resource
|
That part of a Mineral Resource for
which tonnage, densities, shape, physical characteristics, grade
and mineral content can be estimated with a reasonable level of
confidence. It is based sampling and testing information
gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as
outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes. The
locations are too widely or inappropriately spaced to confirm
geological and/or grade continuity but are spaced closely enough
for continuity to be assumed.
|
Inferred Mineral Resource
|
That part of a Mineral Resource for
which tonnage, densities, shape, physical characteristics, grade
and mineral content can be estimated with a low level of
confidence. It is inferred from geological evidence and
assumed but not verified geological and/or grady continuity.
It is based on information gathered through appropriate techniques
from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill
holes that may be limited or of uncertain quality and
reliability.
|
Measured Mineral Resource
|
That part of a Mineral Resource for
which tonnage, densities, shape, physical characteristics, grade
and mineral content can be estimated with a high level of
confidence. It is based on detailed and reliable exploration,
sampling and testing information gathered through appropriate
techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits,
workings and drill holes. The locations are spaced closely
enough to confirm geological and grade continuity.
|