As
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 5,
2008
Registration
No. 333-123159
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
POST-EFFECTIVE
AMENDMENT NO. 5
TO
FORM
S-1
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
IMAGENETIX, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada
|
2833
|
87-0463772
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
(Primary
Standard Industrial
Classification
Code Number)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
Number)
|
10845
Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 105
San
Diego, California 92127
(858) 674-8455
(Address,
including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s
principal executive offices)
William
P. Spencer, Chief Executive Officer
10845
Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 105
San
Diego, California 92127
(858) 674-8455
(Name,
address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of
agent
for service)
Copies
to:
Gary
A. Agron, Esquire
5445
DTC Parkway, Suite 520
Greenwood
Village, CO 80111
(303) 770-7254
(Telephone)
(303) 770-7257
(Facsimile)
Approximate
date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable
after the effective date of this registration statement.
If
any
securities being registered on this form are to be offered on a delayed or
continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act, check the
following box:
x
If
this
form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to
Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box
and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier
effective registration statement for the same offering.
¨
If
this
form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the
Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering.
x
333-123159
If
this
form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the
Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering.
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company
x
|
Explanatory
Notes
This
post-effective amendment on Form S-1 serves as a post-effective amendment to
the
initial registration statement on Form SB-2. The purpose of this
post-effective amendment is to update the financials and other information,
and
to eliminate or modify information regarding those selling stockholders listed
in the initial registration statement who have sold or otherwise ceased
beneficial ownership of their shares pursuant to this registration
statement.
CALCULATION
OF REGISTRATION FEE
Title
of Each Class of
Securities
to be Registered
|
|
Amount To Be
Registered
|
|
Proposed Maximum Offering
Price Per Share
|
|
Proposed Maximum Aggregate
Offering Price
|
|
Amount of
Registration Fee
|
|
Common
Stock, $.001 par value, underlying Common Stock Purchase
Warrants
|
|
|
3,110,710 Shares
|
|
$
|
1.95
|
(1)
|
$
|
6,065,885
|
|
$
|
2,384
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,110,710 Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,384
|
(2)
|
|
(1)
|
Based
on the highest exercise price under the warrants and
options.
|
In
addition to the number of shares set forth above, the amount registered includes
any shares of common stock issued as a result of stock splits, stock dividends
and similar transactions in accordance with Rule 416.
The
Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per Share and the Proposed Maximum Aggregate
Offering Price in the table above were estimated solely for the purpose of
calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(c) promulgated
under the Securities Act of 1933.
The
Registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates
as
may be necessary to delay its effective date until it shall file a further
amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the
Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become
effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting
pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not
sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell
these securities and we are not soliciting an offer to buy these securities
in
any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
Subject
to change
|
Dated September 5, 2008
|
3,110,710
Shares of Common Stock
Underlying
Common Stock Purchase Warrants
IMAGENETIX, INC.
This
prospectus covers the resale of 3,110,710 shares of our common stock underlying
common stock purchase warrants. The shares of common stock and shares underlying
the common stock purchase warrants may be offered by our selling stockholders
from time to time in open market transactions at prevailing market prices.
Our
common stock trades on the Electronic Bulletin Board under the symbol “IAGX.” On
September 2, 2008 the closing price of the common stock was $0.60 per share.
Investing
in our common stock involves substantial risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on
page 4.
The
Securities and Exchange Commission and state securities regulators have not
approved or disapproved these securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy
of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The
date
of this prospectus is September 5, 2008.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
About
this Prospectus
|
1
|
Summary
|
1
|
Risk
Factors
|
4
|
Forward-Looking
Statements
|
7
|
Price
Range of Common Stock
|
7
|
Use
of Proceeds
|
8
|
Capitalization
|
8
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
8
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation
|
9
|
Business
|
19
|
Management
|
27
|
Security
Ownership of Executive Officers, Directors and Beneficial Owners
of
Greater than 5% of Our Common Stock
|
32
|
Selling
Stockholders
|
33
|
Related
Party and Other Material Transactions
|
37
|
Description
of Capital Stock
|
38
|
Shares
Eligible for Future Sale
|
39
|
Experts
|
40
|
Changes
In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
|
40
|
Legal
Matters
|
40
|
Where
You Can Find More Information
|
42
|
Financial
Statements
|
F-1
|
ABOUT
THIS PROSPECTUS
You
should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus as we have
not
authorized any other person to provide you with different information. If anyone
provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely
on
it. We are not making an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction
where such an offer or sale is not permitted.
SUMMARY
This
summary highlights material information regarding our company and the offering
contained in this prospectus. However, you should read the entire prospectus
carefully, including the financial information and related notes, before making
an investment decision.
Business
We
develop, formulate and market over-the-counter, natural-based nutritional
supplements and skin care products. Our products are proprietary, often
supported by scientific studies which we request and are offered through
multiple channels of distribution, including direct marketing companies, also
known as network marketing or multi-level marketing companies, and chain store
retailers. Our primary product is Celadrin® a product formulation which we sell
to the mass market through retailers and on a private label basis to wholesale
customers.
A
key
part of our marketing strategy is to provide to our wholesale customers a
"turnkey" approach to the marketing and distribution of our products. This
turnkey approach provides these customers with all the services necessary to
market our products, including developing specific product formulations,
providing supporting scientific studies regarding the effectiveness of the
product and arranging for the manufacture and marketing of the product.
We
sell
directly to the mass markets through retailers InflameAway, our own Celadrin®
branded product. We also develop and sell products and formulations to
businesses and organizations that market these products through multiple
channels of distribution, including direct marketing companies, mass marketing
companies, medical, health and nutritional professionals, medical newsletters
and direct response radio and television. We also offer Celadrin® products
through wholesale customers that in turn offer their products containing
Celadrin® to mass market retailers.
Our
two
largest customers accounted for 29% and 16% of our net sales for the year ended
March 31, 2008 and 23% and 15% of our net sales for the year ended
March 31, 2007.
Our
management and key personnel have many years experience in developing and
selling nutritional products to direct marketers, health food stores and mass
market merchandisers.
History
We
were
organized as a Nevada corporation in March 1988 under the name Capital
Growth, Inc. and completed an initial public offering of our securities in
1989. Imagenetix, Inc. was incorporated in Colorado in July 1996 under
the name Internet International Business Management, Inc. and changed its
name to Imagenetix, Inc. in April 1999. In October 2000 we merged
with Imagenetix, Inc. Under the terms of the merger, we issued 6,550,000
shares of our common stock and 3,315,000 common stock purchase warrants and
stock options to the Imagenetix security holders to acquire all 6,550,000 shares
of Imagenetix Inc.’s outstanding common stock, along with all of its stock
options and common stock purchase warrants. Our principal executive offices
are
located at 10845 Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 105, San Diego, California 92127,
and our telephone number is (858) 674-8455.
The
Offering
Securities
offered by our
Selling
stockholders
|
3,110,710
shares of common stock underlying common stock purchase
warrants.
|
|
|
Securities
outstanding prior to
and
after the offering
|
10,960,788
shares of common stock, which does not include shares issuable upon
exercise of the 3,110,710 outstanding common stock purchase warrants
and
stock options.
|
|
|
Use
of proceeds
|
Any
proceeds we receive from the exercise of common stock purchase warrants
will be added to our working capital.
|
|
|
Electronic
Bulletin Board symbol
|
IAGX
|
Description
of Selling Stockholders
Through
this prospectus, we are registering the resale of up to 3,110,710 shares of
common stock underlying common stock purchase warrants which were registered
for
resale by our prospectuses dated July 26, 2002 and March 18, 2005 and our post
effective amendments dated August 25, 2003, November 14, 2005, September 28,
2006 and July 30, 2007 and were issued by us in 2000 and 2001 and extended
in
2006 and 2007 in consideration of equity investments by accredited individual
investors. None of our selling stockholders are broker dealers.
SUMMARY
FINANCIAL DATA
The
following summary financial data should be read in conjunction with
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation” and our audited
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Consolidated
Statement of Income Data:
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
1,394,358
|
|
$
|
1,126,991
|
|
$
|
5,569,593
|
|
$
|
5,596,725
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
587,076
|
|
$
|
(435,526
|
)
|
$
|
(1,776,642
|
)
|
$
|
(667,639
|
)
|
Net
income (loss) per basic share
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
$
|
(0.16
|
)
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working
capital
|
|
$
|
3,740,977
|
|
$
|
3,083,227
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
5,497,285
|
|
$
|
4,384,872
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,380,951
|
|
$
|
932,280
|
|
Stockholders’
equity
|
|
$
|
4,116,334
|
|
$
|
3,452,592
|
|
RISK
FACTORS
The
shares of common stock offered by this prospectus involve a high degree of
risk
and represent a highly speculative investment. You should not purchase these
shares if you cannot afford the loss of your entire investment. In addition
to
the other information contained in this prospectus, you should carefully
consider the following risk factors in evaluating our company, our business
prospects and an investment in our shares of common stock.
There
Is Only One Supplier for Celadrin®. If We Are Unable to Purchase Celadrin® from
This Supplier, Our Business Would Be Harmed.
There
is
only one supplier for Celadrin®, which we use in approximately 58% of our
products and which represented approximately 74% of our sales for the year
ended
March 31, 2008. We will rely upon Celadrin® to expand our product lines and
revenue in the future. If our Celadrin® supplier goes out of business or elects
for any reason not to supply us with Celadrin®, we would have to find another
Celadrin® supplier or suffer a significant reduction in our
revenue.
We
Rely upon a Limited Number of Customers the Loss of Which Would Reduce Our
Revenue and Any Earnings.
Our
largest customers accounted for 29% and 16% of our net sales for the year ended
March 31, 2008 and 23% and 15% of our net sales for the year ended March 31,
2007. The loss of any of these customers could significantly reduce our revenue
and adversely affect our cash flow and earnings, if any.
We
Rely upon Other Outside Suppliers to Produce Our Products Which Could Delay
Our
Product Deliveries.
All
of
our products are produced by outside manufacturers who process ingredients
provided to them by our suppliers and with whom we have contracts. Our profit
margins and our ability to deliver products on a timely basis are dependent
upon
these manufacturers and suppliers. Should any of these manufacturers or
suppliers fail to provide us with product, we would be required to obtain new
manufacturers and suppliers, which would be costly and time consuming and could
delay our product deliveries.
Product
Liability Claims Against Us Could Be Costly.
Some
of
our nutritional supplements contain newly-introduced ingredients or combinations
of ingredients, and we have little long-term health information about
individuals consuming those ingredients. If any of these products were thought
or proved to be harmful, we could be subject to litigation. Although we carry
product liability insurance in the face amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence
and
$2,000,000 in the aggregate and require our suppliers and manufacturers to
include us as insured parties on their product liability insurance policies,
our
coverage may not be adequate to protect us from potential product liability
claims and costs of defense.
We
Are Subject to Intense Competition from Other Nutritional Supplement Marketers
Which Could Reduce Our Revenue and Profit Margins.
Competition
in the nutritional supplement market is intense. We compete with numerous
companies that have longer operating histories, more products and greater name
recognition and financial resources than we do. In order to compete, we could
be
forced to lower our product prices, which would reduce our revenue and profit
margins.
We
Are Highly Regulated, Which Increases Our Costs of Doing Business.
We
are
subject to laws and regulations which cover:
|
•
|
the
formulation, manufacturing, packaging, labeling, distribution,
importation, sale and storage of
our
products;
|
|
•
|
the
health and safety of food and drugs;
|
|
•
|
trade
practice and direct selling laws; and
|
|
•
|
product
claims and advertising by us; or for which we may be held responsible.
|
Compliance
with these laws and regulations is time consuming and expensive. Moreover,
new
regulations could be adopted that would severely restrict the products we sell
or our ability to continue our business. We are unable to predict the nature
of
any future laws, regulations, interpretations or applications, nor can we
predict what effect additional governmental regulations or administrative
orders, when and if promulgated, would have on our business in the future.
These
future changes could, however, require the reformulation or elimination of
certain products; imposition of additional record keeping and documentation
requirements; imposition of new federal reporting and application requirements;
modified methods of importing, manufacturing, storing or distributing certain
products; and expanded or different labeling and substantiation requirements
for
certain products and ingredients. Any or all of these requirements could harm
our business.
There
Are Limitations on the Liability of Our Officers and Directors Which May
Restrict Our Stockholders from Bringing Claims.
Our
Bylaws substantially limit the liability of our officers and directors to us
and
our stockholders for negligence and breach of fiduciary or other duties to
us.
This limitation may prevent stockholders from bringing claims against our
officers and directors in the future.
Shares
of Our Common Stock Which Are Eligible for Sale by Our Stockholders May Decrease
the Price of Our Common Stock.
We
have
10,960,788 common shares outstanding which are freely tradeable or saleable
under Rule 144. We also have outstanding common stock warrants and stock options
exercisable into up to 5,176,957 shares of common stock which could become
free
trading if exercised. If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common
stock, the market price of our common stock could decrease.
There
is a Limited but Potentially Volatile Trading Market in Our Common Stock, Which
May Adversely Affect Our Stock Price.
Our
common stock trades on the Electronic Bulletin Board. The Bulletin Board tends
to be highly illiquid, in part because there is no national quotation system
by
which potential investors can track the market price of shares except through
information received or generated by a limited number of broker-dealers that
make a market in particular stocks. There is a greater chance of market
volatility for securities that trade on the Bulletin Board as opposed to a
national exchange or quotation system. This volatility may be caused by a
variety of factors, including:
|
•
|
The
lack of readily available price quotations;
|
|
•
|
The
absence of consistent administrative supervision of "bid" and "ask"
quotations;
|
|
•
|
Lower
trading volume; and
|
There
could be wide fluctuations in the market price of our common stock. These
fluctuations may have an extremely negative effect on the market price of our
securities and may prevent you from obtaining a market price equal to your
purchase price when you attempt to sell our securities in the open market.
In
these situations, you may be required to either sell our securities at a market
price which is lower than your purchase price, or to hold our securities for
a
longer period of time than you planned.
Because
Our Common Stock May Be Classified as "Penny Stock," Trading in it Could Be
Limited, and Our Stock Price Could Decline.
In
the
future, our common stock may fall under the definition of "penny stock" if
our
net tangible assets decline below $2,500,000. In such event, trading in our
common stock would be limited because broker-dealers will be required to provide
their customers with disclosure documents prior to allowing them to participate
in transactions involving our common stock. These disclosure requirements are
burdensome to broker-dealers and may discourage them from allowing their
customers to participate in transactions involving our common stock.
"Penny
stocks" are equity securities with a market price below $5.00 per share, other
than a security that is registered on a national exchange or included for
quotation on the Nasdaq system, unless, as in our case, the issuer has net
tangible assets of more than $2,000,000 and has been in continuous operation
for
greater than three years. Issuers who have been in operation for less than
three
years must have net tangible assets of at least $5,000,000.
Rules
promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 15(g) of
the
Exchange Act require broker-dealers engaging in transactions in penny stocks,
to
first provide to their customers a series of disclosures and documents,
including:
|
•
|
A
standardized risk disclosure document identifying the risks inherent
in
investment in penny
stocks;
|
|
•
|
All
compensation received by the broker-dealer in connection with the
transaction;
|
|
•
|
Current
quotation prices and other relevant market data; and
|
|
•
|
Monthly
account statements reflecting the fair market value of the securities.
In
addition, these
|
rules
require that a broker-dealer obtain financial and other information from a
customer, determine that transactions in penny stocks are suitable for such
customer and deliver a written statement to such customer setting forth the
basis for this determination.
In
addition, under the Exchange Act and its regulations, any person engaged in
a
distribution of shares of our common stock offered by this prospectus may not
simultaneously engage in market making activities with respect to the common
stock during the applicable “cooling off” periods prior to the commencement of
this distribution.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This
prospectus contains statements that plan for or anticipate the future. These
forward-looking statements include statements about the future of nutritional
products, statements about our future business plans and strategies, and other
statements that are not historical in nature. In this prospectus forward-looking
statements are generally identified by the words “anticipate,” “plan,”
“believe,” “expect,” “estimate,” and the like. Although we believe that the
forward-looking statements made in this prospectus are reasonable, because
forward-looking statements involve future risks and uncertainties, there are
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed or implied. For example, uncertainties that could affect the accuracy
of forward-looking statements, besides the specific factors identified in the
“Risk Factors” section of this prospectus, including the following:
|
•
|
Changes
in general economic and business conditions affecting the nutritional
supplement and personal care industries;
|
|
•
|
Changes
in our business strategies; and
|
|
•
|
Market
acceptance of our products.
|
PRICE
RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
Our
common stock trades on the over-the-counter Electronic Bulletin Board of the
NASD under the symbol “IAGX.” The range of high and low closing prices for our
common stock during the quarters indicated is shown below. Prices are
inter-dealer quotations as reported by the NASD and do not necessarily reflect
transactions, retail markups, mark downs or commissions.
Quarter
Ended:
|
|
Closing
Price
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
Quarter
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
Second
Quarter (through September 2, 2008)
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
Quarter
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
$
|
1.42
|
|
$
|
0.94
|
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
$
|
1.22
|
|
$
|
0.77
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
Quarter
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
We
have
not declared any cash dividends on our common stock and do not intend to declare
dividends in the foreseeable future. We intend to use our available funds for
the development of our business. There are no material restrictions limiting,
or
likely to limit, our ability to pay dividends on our common stock.
As
of
June 30, 2008, we had approximately 314 stockholders of record.
USE
OF PROCEEDS
Any
proceeds we receive from the exercise of the 3,110,710 common stock purchase
warrants will be added to our working capital.
CAPITALIZATION
The
following table sets forth our capitalization as of June 30 and March 31, 2008.
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
Preferred
Stock, $.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares outstanding
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Common
Stock, $.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 10,960,788
shares
issued and outstanding
|
|
|
10,960
|
|
|
10,960
|
|
Capital
in excess of par value
|
|
|
12,558,073
|
|
|
12,481,407
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(8,452,699
|
)
|
|
(9,039,775
|
)
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
4,116,334
|
|
$
|
3,452,592
|
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
The
following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Consolidated
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
1,394,358
|
|
$
|
1,126,991
|
|
$
|
5,569,593
|
|
$
|
5,596,725
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
587,076
|
|
$
|
(435,526
|
)
|
$
|
(1,776,642
|
)
|
$
|
(667,639
|
)
|
Net
income (loss) per basic share
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
$
|
(0.16
|
)
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
Balance
Sheet Data:
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working
capital
|
|
$
|
3,740,977
|
|
$
|
3,083,227
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
5,497,285
|
|
$
|
4,384,872
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,380,951
|
|
$
|
932,280
|
|
Stockholders’
equity
|
|
$
|
4,116,334
|
|
$
|
3,452,592
|
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR
PLAN
OF OPERATION
Preliminary
Notes Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Investors
should understand that several factors govern whether any forward-looking
statement contained herein will be or can be achieved. Any one of those factors
could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected herein.
These forward-looking statements include plans and objectives of management
for
future operations, including plans and objectives relating to our products
and
future economic performance. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve
judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive
and
market conditions, future business decisions, and the time and money required
to
successfully complete development projects, all of which are beyond our control.
Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking
statements contained herein are reasonable, any of those assumptions could
prove
inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the results
contemplated in any of the forward-looking statements contained herein will
be
realized. Based on actual experience and business developments, the impact
of
which may cause us to alter our marketing, capital expenditure plans or other
budgets, which may in turn affect our results of operations in light of the
other significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements
included herein, the inclusion of any such statement should not be regarded
as a
representation by us or any other person that our objectives or plans will
be
achieved.
Overview
We
develop, formulate and market over-the-counter, natural-based nutritional
supplements and skin care products. Our products are proprietary, often
supported by scientific studies which we request and are offered through
multiple channels of distribution, including direct marketing companies, also
known as network marketing or multi-level marketing companies, and chain store
retailers. Our primary product is Celadrin® a product formulation which we sell
to the mass market through retailers and on a private label basis to wholesale
customers.
A
key
part of our marketing strategy is to provide to our wholesale customers a
"turnkey" approach to the marketing and distribution of our products. This
turnkey approach provides these customers with all the services necessary to
market our products, including developing specific product formulations,
providing supporting scientific studies regarding the effectiveness of the
product and arranging for the manufacture and marketing of the product.
We
sell
directly to the mass markets through retailers InflameAway, our own Celadrin®
branded product. We also develop and sell products and formulations to
businesses and organizations that market these products through multiple
channels of distribution, including direct marketing companies, mass marketing
companies, medical, health and nutritional professionals, medical newsletters
and direct response radio and television. We also offer Celadrin® products
through wholesale customers that in turn offer their products containing
Celadrin® to mass market retailers.
Management's
discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition are
based upon the Company's financial statements. These statements have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. These principles require management to make certain
estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates based on
historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are
not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
We
have
identified eight accounting principles that we believe are key to an
understanding of our financial statements. These important accounting policies
require management's most difficult, subjective judgments.
1.
Cash and Cash Equivalents.
For
purposes of the financial statements, we consider all highly liquid debt
investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents.
2.
Accounts receivable
.
Accounts
receivable are carried at the expected net realizable value. The allowance
for
doubtful accounts is based on management’s assessment of the collectibility of
specific customer accounts and the aging of the accounts receivable. If there
were a deterioration of a major customer’s creditworthiness, or actual defaults
were higher than historical experience, our estimates of the recoverability
of
amounts due to us could be overstated, which could have a negative impact on
operations.
3.
Inventory
Inventory
is carried at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by the first-in
first-out method.
4.
Property and Equipment
Property
and equipment are stated at cost. Expenditures for major renewals and
betterments that extend the useful lives of property and equipment are
capitalized, upon being placed in service. Expenditures for maintenance and
repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is computed over the
estimated useful life of three to seven years, except leasehold improvements
which are depreciated over the lesser of the remaining lease life or the life
of
the asset, using the straight-line method. We follow the provisions of the
Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards ("SFAS") No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-lived
Assets." Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be held
and
used by us are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. We continuously evaluate the recoverability of our long-lived
assets based on estimated future cash flows and the estimated fair value of
such
long-lived assets, and provide for impairment if such undiscounted cash flows
are insufficient to recover the carrying amount of the long-lived
asset.
5.
Trademarks and Patents
Patents
and trademarks are carried at cost less accumulated amortization and are
amortized over their estimated useful lives of from 8 to 17 years for patents
and 10 years for trademarks. The carrying value of patents and trademarks is
periodically reviewed and impairments, if any, are recognized when the expected
future benefit to be derived from individual intangible assets is less than
its
carrying value determined based on the provisions of SFAS No. 144 as discussed
above.
6.
Stock
Based Compensation
We
adopted SFAS No.123R effective January 1, 2006, which requires that share-based
payments be reflected as an expense based upon the grant-date fair value of
those awards. The expense is recognized over the remaining vesting periods
of
the awards. The Company estimates the fair value of these awards, including
stock options and warrants, using the Black-Scholes model. This model requires
management to make certain estimates in the assumptions used in this model,
including the expected term the award will be held, volatility of the underlying
common stock, discount rate and forfeiture rate. We develop our assumptions
based on our past historical trends as well as consider changes for future
expectations.
7.
Revenue Recognition
We
recognize revenue in accordance with the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 104, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” (SAB104), Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 48, “Revenue Recognition When Right
of Return Exists” (SFAS 48), and Emerging Issues Task Force Abstract (EITF)
No. 01-9, “Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer
(Including a Reseller of the Vendor’s Products.” SAB 104 requires that four
basic criteria be met before revenue can be recognized: 1) there is evidence
that an arrangement exists; 2) delivery has occurred; 3) the fee is fixed or
determinable; and 4) collectibility is reasonably assured. SFAS 48 states that
revenue from sales transactions where the buyer has the right to return the
product shall be recognized at the time of sale only if (1) the seller’s
price to the buyer is substantially fixed or determinable at the date of sale;
(2) the buyer has paid the seller, or the buyer is obligated to pay the
seller and the obligation is not contingent on resale of the product;
(3) the buyer’s obligation to the seller would not be changed in the event
of theft or physical destruction or damage of the product; (4) the buyer
acquiring the product for resale has economic substance apart from that provided
by the seller; (5) the seller does not have significant obligations for
future performance to directly bring about resale of the product by the buyer;
and (6) the amount of future returns can be reasonably estimated. We
recognize revenue upon determination that all criteria for revenue recognition
have been met. The criteria are usually met at the time title passes to the
customer, which usually occurs upon shipment. Revenue from shipments where
title
passes upon delivery is deferred until the shipment has been delivered.
We
account for payments made to customers in accordance with EITF 01-09, which
states that cash consideration (including a sales incentive) given by a vendor
to a customer is presumed to be a reduction of the selling prices of the
vendor’s products or services and, therefore, should be characterized as a
reduction of revenue when recognized in the vendor’s income statement, rather
than a sales and marketing expense. We have various agreements with customers
that provide for discounts and rebates. These agreements are classified as
a
reduction of revenue. Certain other costs associated with customers that meet
the requirements of EITF 01-09 are recorded as sales and marketing expense.
Vendor considerations recorded as a reduction of sales were $893,000 and
$232,000 for the years ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
We
guarantee customer satisfaction. Our policy requires the customer to return
the
unused product to the retailer from whom they originally purchased it. We pay
the retailer for the returned product plus a handling cost. We periodically
assess the adequacy of this policy and will record a liability as necessary.
For
the years ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, there were no returns that would
suggest a liability needed to be recorded.
We
review
gross revenue for estimated returns of private label contract manufacturing
products and direct-to-consumer products. The estimated returns are based upon
the trailing six months of private label contract manufacturing gross sales
and
our historical experience for both private label contract manufacturing and
direct-to-consumer product returns. However, the estimate for product returns
does not reflect the impact of a large product recall resulting from product
nonconformance or other factors as such events are not predictable nor is the
related economic impact estimable. For the years ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
there were no returns that would suggest a liability needed to be
recorded.
As
part
of the services we provide to our private label contract manufacturing
customers, we may perform, but are not required to perform, certain research
and
development activities related to the development or improvement of their
products. While our customers typically do not pay directly for this service,
the cost of this service is included as a component of the price we charge
to
manufacture and deliver their products.
8.
Income Taxes
We
account for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” This statement requires an
asset and liability approach for accounting for income taxes.
Selected
Financial Information
Results
of Operations
Year
Ended March 31, 2008 Compared to Year Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/31/08
|
|
3/31/07
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements
of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
5,569,593
|
|
$
|
5,596,725
|
|
$
|
(27,132
|
)
|
|
-0.5
|
%
|
Cost
of goods sold
|
|
|
3,344,034
|
|
|
2,969,002
|
|
|
375,032
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
%
of net sales
|
|
|
60.04
|
%
|
|
53.05
|
%
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
2,225,559
|
|
|
2,627,723
|
|
|
(402,164
|
)
|
|
-15.3
|
%
|
%
of net sales
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
-7
|
%
|
|
-14.9
|
%
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
2,456,192
|
|
|
1,407,996
|
|
|
1,048,196
|
|
|
74.4
|
%
|
Payroll
expense
|
|
|
1,037,775
|
|
|
712,945
|
|
|
324,830
|
|
|
45.6
|
%
|
Consulting
expense
|
|
|
961,349
|
|
|
1,339,515
|
|
|
(378,166
|
)
|
|
-28.2
|
%
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
4,455,316
|
|
|
3,460,456
|
|
|
994,860
|
|
|
28.7
|
%
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(4,367
|
)
|
|
(6,791
|
)
|
|
(2,424
|
)
|
|
-35.7
|
%
|
Other
income
|
|
|
32,182
|
|
|
32,885
|
|
|
(703
|
)
|
|
-2.1
|
%
|
Income
tax benefit
|
|
|
425,300
|
|
|
139,000
|
|
|
286,300
|
|
|
206.0
|
%
|
Net
(loss)
|
|
|
(1,776,642
|
)
|
|
(667,639
|
)
|
|
1,109,003
|
|
|
166.1
|
%
|
Net
(loss) per share basic and diluted
|
|
|
(0.16
|
)
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
160.9
|
%
|
Net
Sales
Net
sales
for the year ended March 31, 2008 decreased $27,132, 0.5%, to $5,569,593
compared to $5,596,725 for the year ended March 31, 2007. Gross sales increased
by approximately $1 million due to our initiating a direct mass market strategy
with our own product, InflameAway, that identifies Celadrin
â
as its
marquee ingredient. This sales increase was offset by a like amount in product
rebates and giveaways in support of marketing InflameAway through retail
distribution channels. We anticipate, the new marketing program coupled with
additional distribution agreements to wholesale and multi-level marketing
customers to result in improved sales during our next fiscal year.
Cost
of Goods Sold
Cost
of
goods sold as a percentage of net sales increased from 53% for the year ended
March 31, 2007 to 60% for the year ended March 31, 2008. This increase was
primarily due to the costs associated with the rebate and giveaway
marketing strategy discussed above which resulted in InflameAway product being
provided at no cost to the eventual customer. Although rebate and giveaway
programs are customary in the mass market distribution channel, we do not
anticipate this year’s level of activity used to launch the awareness of
InflameAway to continue during the next fiscal year.
General
and Administrative
General
and administrative expenses increased by $1,048,196, a 74.4% increase, to
$2,456,192 for the year ended March 31, 2008 from $1,407,996 for the year ended
March 31, 2007. The primary reasons for the increase were an approximate
increase of $1,268,000 of marketing and advertising costs related to the media
campaign to introduce InflameAway to the mass market offset by an approximate
$231,000 decrease in research and development costs during the current fiscal
year.
Payroll
Expense
Payroll
expense increased to $1,037,775 for the year ended March 31, 2008, an increase
of 45.6% or $324,830, compared to $712,945 for the year ended March 31, 2007.
This increase was a result of non-cash compensation expense of approximately
$269,000 related to the issuance of employee stock options and approximately
$55,000 in normal salary and bonus increases during the current fiscal year.
Consulting
Expenses
Consulting
expenses decreased to $961,349 for the year ended March 31, 2008, a decrease
of
28.2% or $378,166, compared to $1,339,515 for the year ended March 31, 2007.
This decrease was a result of a decrease in litigation expenses of approximately
$100,000, a decrease in consulting related to new product introduction including
our periodontal application of approximately $204,000, and a reduction in
accounting and other professional and technical expenses across the
board.
Provision
for Income Taxes
As
a
result of the loss during the year ended March 31, 2008, we reflected an income
tax benefit of $425,300 compared to income tax benefit of $139,000 for the
year
ended March 31, 2007. Since we have used up our federal and state tax loss
carry-forwards, we anticipate income tax expense to increase in the future
relative to income before taxes.
Capital
Resources
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
3/31/08
|
|
3/31/07
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working
Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
$
|
4,012,527
|
|
$
|
4,583,149
|
|
$
|
(570,622
|
)
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
929,300
|
|
|
650,602
|
|
|
278,698
|
|
Working
capital
|
|
$
|
3,083,227
|
|
$
|
3,932,547
|
|
$
|
(849,320
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt
|
|
$
|
2,980
|
|
$
|
37,239
|
|
$
|
(34,259
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity
|
|
$
|
3,452,592
|
|
$
|
4,572,762
|
|
$
|
(1,120,170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements
of Cash Flows Select Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash provided (used) by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
activities
|
|
$
|
(116,736
|
)
|
$
|
(819,292
|
)
|
$
|
702,556
|
|
Investing
activities
|
|
$
|
(30,626
|
)
|
$
|
(51,838
|
)
|
$
|
21,212
|
|
Financing
activities
|
|
$
|
211,021
|
|
$
|
22,010
|
|
$
|
189,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet Select Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,022,555
|
|
$
|
958,896
|
|
$
|
63,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
|
$
|
765,492
|
|
$
|
1,576,641
|
|
$
|
(811,149
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory,
net
|
|
$
|
1,109,845
|
|
$
|
1,284,458
|
|
$
|
(174,613
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
785,625
|
|
$
|
432,354
|
|
$
|
353,271
|
|
Liquidity
We
have
historically financed our operations internally and through debt and equity
financings. At March 31, 2008, we had cash holdings of $1,022,555, an increase
of $63,659 compared to March 31, 2007. Our net working capital position at
March
31, 2008, was $3,083,227 compared to $3,932,547 as of March 31, 2007. This
reduction was primarily the result of a decrease in accounts receivable and
inventory. We believe that our cash position is sufficient to fund our operating
activities for at least the next 12 months.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In
December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued SFAS
No. 161,
Disclosures
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 133.
This
standard requires companies to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and
why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and
related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related
interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items
affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.
This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
and
interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application
encouraged. The Company has not yet adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 161,
but
does not expect it to have a material impact on its consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
In
December 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 110 regarding
the use of a "simplified" method, as discussed in SAB No. 107 (SAB 107), in
developing an estimate of expected term of "plain vanilla" share options in
accordance with SFAS No. 123 (R),
Share-Based
Payment
. In
particular, the staff indicated in SAB 107 that it will accept a company's
election to use the simplified method, regardless of whether the company has
sufficient information to make more refined estimates of expected term. At
the
time SAB 107 was issued, the staff believed that more detailed external
information about employee exercise behavior (e.g., employee exercise patterns
by industry and/or other categories of companies) would, over time, become
readily available to companies. Therefore, the staff stated in SAB 107 that
it
would not expect a company to use the simplified method for share option grants
after December 31, 2007. The staff understands that such detailed information
about employee exercise behavior may not be widely available by December 31,
2007. Accordingly, the staff will continue to accept, under certain
circumstances, the use of the simplified method beyond December 31, 2007. The
Company currently uses the simplified method for “plain vanilla” share options
and warrants, and will assess the impact of SAB 110 for fiscal year 2009. It
is
not believed that this will have an impact on the Company’s consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
—an
amendment of ARB No. 51. This statement amends ARB 51 to establish
accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a
subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the
consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated
financial statements. Before this statement was issued, limited guidance existed
for reporting noncontrolling interests. As a result, considerable diversity
in
practice existed. So-called minority interests were reported in the consolidated
statement of financial position as liabilities or in the mezzanine section
between liabilities and equity. This statement improves comparability by
eliminating that diversity. This statement is effective for fiscal years, and
interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15,
2008 (that is, January 1, 2009, for entities with calendar year-ends). Earlier
adoption is prohibited. The effective date of this statement is the same as
that
of the related Statement 141 (revised 2007). The Company will adopt this
Statement beginning April 1, 2009. It is not believed that this will have an
impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.
In
December 2007, the FASB, issued FAS No. 141 (revised 2007),
Business
Combinations.
’This
Statement replaces FASB Statement No. 141,
Business
Combinations
,
but
retains the fundamental requirements in Statement 141. This
Statement establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer: (a)
recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree; (b) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business
combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and (c) determines what
information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate
the nature and financial effects of the business combination. This statement
applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date
is
on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on
or
after December 15, 2008. An entity may not apply it before that date. The
effective date of this statement is the same as that of the related FASB
Statement No. 160,
Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
. The
Company will adopt this statement beginning April 1, 2009. It is not believed
that this will have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
In
February 2007, the FASB, issued SFAS No. 159,
The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities
—Including
an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This standard permits an
entity to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items
at fair value. This option is available to all entities. Most of the provisions
in FAS 159 are elective; however, an amendment to FAS 115
Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities
applies
to all entities with available for sale or trading securities. Some requirements
apply differently to entities that do not report net income. SFAS No. 159 is
effective as of the beginning of an entities first fiscal year that begins
after
November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of the
previous fiscal year provided that the entity makes that choice in the first
120
days of that fiscal year and also elects to apply the provisions of SFAS No.
157
Fair
Value Measurements
. The
Company will adopt SFAS No. 159 beginning April 1, 2008 and is currently
evaluating the potential impact the adoption of this pronouncement will have
on
its consolidated financial statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair
Value Measurements
This
statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value
in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements. This statement applies under other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the Board having
previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is
the
relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, this statement does not require
any
new fair value measurements. However, for some entities, the application of
this
statement will change current practice. This statement is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007,
and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is
encouraged, provided that the reporting entity has not yet issued financial
statements for that fiscal year, including financial statements for an interim
period within that fiscal year. The Company will adopt this statement April
1,
2008, and it is not believed that this will have an impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
Results
of Operations
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30,
2007
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/30/08
|
|
6/30/07
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements
of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
1,394,358
|
|
$
|
1,126,991
|
|
$
|
267,367
|
|
|
23.7
|
%
|
Cost
of goods sold
|
|
|
819,711
|
|
|
536,604
|
|
|
283,107
|
|
|
52.8
|
%
|
%
of net sales
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
574,647
|
|
|
590,387
|
|
|
(15,740
|
)
|
|
-2.7
|
%
|
%
of net sales
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
-11
|
%
|
|
-21.3
|
%
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
605,472
|
|
|
646,509
|
|
|
(41,037
|
)
|
|
-6.3
|
%
|
Payroll
expense
|
|
|
372,190
|
|
|
356,497
|
|
|
15,693
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
Consulting
expense
|
|
|
345,761
|
|
|
251,524
|
|
|
94,237
|
|
|
37.5
|
%
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
1,323,423
|
|
|
1,254,530
|
|
|
68,893
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(690
|
)
|
|
(1,327
|
)
|
|
(637
|
)
|
|
-48.0
|
%
|
Settlement
income
|
|
|
1,785,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,785,000
|
|
|
NM
|
|
Other
income
|
|
|
7,742
|
|
|
6,944
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
Provision
for (benefit from) taxes
|
|
|
456,200
|
|
|
(223,000
|
)
|
|
(679,200
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
|
587,076
|
|
|
(435,526
|
)
|
|
1,022,602
|
|
|
NM
|
|
Net
income (loss) per share basic
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
NM
|
|
Net
Sales
Net
sales
for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 increased $267,367, a 23.7% increase, to
$1,394,358 compared to $1,126,991 for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. The
primary reason for the sales increase was attributed to increased sales to
a
distributor of our raw material. Sales of our own branded product, Inflame
Away,
that identifies Celadrin
â
as its
marquee ingredient, continued to increase but was offset by product rebates
and
giveaways in support of marketing InflameAway through retail distribution
channels. In addition, sales of our weight loss product increased during the
first fiscal quarter. We anticipate, the new marketing program coupled with
additional distribution agreements to wholesale and multi-level marketing
customers to result in improved sales during the balance of our current fiscal
year.
Cost
of Goods Sold
Cost
of
goods sold as a percentage of net sales increased from 48% for the quarter
ended
June 30, 2007 to 59% for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. This increase was
primarily due to the costs associated with the rebate and giveaway marketing
strategy discussed above which resulted in InflameAway product being provided
at
no cost to the eventual customer. Rebate and giveaway programs are customary
in
the mass market distribution channel. We anticipate levels of promotional
activities used to launch the awareness of InflameAway will be reduced in the
future.
General
and Administrative
General
and administrative expenses decreased by $41,037, a 6.3% decrease, to $605,472
for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 from $646,509 for the quarter ended June
30,
2007. The primary reasons for the decrease were an approximate $73,000 decrease
in advertising expenses related to the launch of InflameAway offset by an
increase in expenses related to clinical research studies and travel expenses.
We anticipate continued increases in general and administrative expenses as
a
result of increasing our advertising campaign for our Inflame Away product
and
an increase in clinical research studies.
Payroll
Expense
Payroll
expense increased to $372,190 for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, an increase
of 4.4% or $15,693, compared to $356,497 for the quarter ended June 30, 2007.
This increase was a result of normal salary increases.
Consulting
Expenses
Consulting
expenses increased to $345,761 for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, an increase
of 37.5% or $94,237 compared to $251,524 for the quarter ended June 30, 2007.
This increase was a result of increased litigation expenses related to the
settlement of a potential trademark infringement case coupled with increased
audit fees related to requirements to include management’s assessment of
internal controls in financial statements. We anticipate consulting fees to
decrease since litigation has been successfully concluded.
Settlement
Income
During
the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we received $2,100,000 ($1,785,000 after costs)
as a result of entering into a settlement agreement with a company we alleged
was infringing on the Celadrin trademark. In addition, we entered into a supply
agreement with the same company whereby we will provide Celadrin for use in
their products.
Provision
for Income Taxes
As
a
result of income for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, an income tax expense
of
$456,200 was recognized during the current quarter compared to $223,000 of
income tax benefit being recognized during the quarter ended June 30, 2007.
Capital
Resources
Working
Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
6/30/08
|
|
3/31/08
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
$
|
5,121,928
|
|
$
|
4,012,527
|
|
$
|
1,109,401
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
1,380,951
|
|
|
929,300
|
|
|
451,651
|
|
Working
capital
|
|
$
|
3,740,977
|
|
$
|
3,083,227
|
|
$
|
657,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
2,980
|
|
$
|
(2,980
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity
|
|
$
|
4,116,334
|
|
$
|
3,452,592
|
|
$
|
663,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements
of Cash Flows Select Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
|
6/30/08
|
|
|
6/30/07
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
Net
cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
activities
|
|
$
|
1,074,111
|
|
$
|
632,085
|
|
$
|
442,026
|
|
Investing
activities
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
(12,840
|
)
|
$
|
12,840
|
|
Financing
activities
|
|
$
|
(31,410
|
)
|
$
|
(32,658
|
)
|
$
|
1,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet Select Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
|
6/30/08
|
|
|
3/31/08
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalients
|
|
$
|
2,065,256
|
|
$
|
1,022,555
|
|
$
|
1,042,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
|
$
|
1,249,603
|
|
$
|
765,492
|
|
$
|
484,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories,
net
|
|
$
|
1,246,851
|
|
$
|
1,109,845
|
|
$
|
137,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
1,089,388
|
|
$
|
785,625
|
|
$
|
303,763
|
|
Liquidity
We
have
historically financed our operations internally and through debt and equity
financings. At June 30, 2008, we had cash holdings of $2,065,256, an increase
of
$1,042,701 compared to March 31, 2008. Our net working capital position at
June
30, 2008, was $3,740,977 compared to $3,083,227 as of March 31, 2008. We have
initiated a direct mass market strategy with our own product, Inflame Away.
Although, a significant portion of our working capital may be needed to
implement this strategy, we believe that our cash position is sufficient to
fund
our operating activities for at least the next 12 months.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In
March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS No. 161”). SFAS
No. 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirement for FASB Statement
No. 133, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS
No. 133”). It requires enhanced disclosure about (i) how and why an
entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how derivative instruments and
related hedge items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related
interpretations, and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedge
items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash
flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for the Company as of April 1, 2009.
The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS 161 on its consolidated
financial position and results of operations.
In
May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles.” SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of
accounting principles and provides entities with a framework for selecting
the
principles used in preparation of financial statements that are presented in
conformity with GAAP. The current GAAP hierarchy has been criticized because
it
is directed to the auditor rather than the entity, it is complex, and it ranks
FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts, which are subject to the
same
level of due process as FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Standards,
below
industry practices that are widely recognized as generally accepted but that
are
not subject to due process. The Board believes the GAAP hierarchy should be
directed to entities because it is the entity (not its auditors) that is
responsible for selecting accounting principles for financial statements that
are presented in conformity with GAAP. The adoption of FASB 162 is not expected
to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and
results of operations.
In
April 2008, the FASB issued FSP 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets”, (FSP 142-3). FSP 142-3 amends the factors that should be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine
the
useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets”. FSP 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently assessing the impact of
FSP 142-3 on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
BUSINESS
Our
Business
We
develop, formulate and market over-the-counter, natural-based nutritional
supplements and skin care products. Our products are proprietary, often
supported by scientific studies which we request and are offered through
multiple channels of distribution including direct sales to the mass market
through retailers, direct marketing companies, medical, health and nutritional
professionals, medical newsletters and direct response radio and television.
A
key
part of our marketing strategy is to provide a "turnkey" approach to the
marketing and distribution of our products. Our "turnkey" approach provides:
|
•
|
Specific
product formulations requested by our customers;
|
|
•
|
Scientific
studies to support claims made for our products;
|
|
•
|
Assistance
in complying with U.S. laws and regulations;
|
|
•
|
Assistance
in obtaining foreign country regulatory approval for sale of our
products;
|
|
•
|
Marketing
materials and marketing assistance to support product sales; and
|
|
•
|
Manufacture
of products with delivery directly to the customer.
|
Following
development of a new product, and on behalf of our customers, we:
|
•
|
Conduct
and complete any scientific studies necessary for regulatory
compliance;
|
|
•
|
Arrange
for the manufacture of finished products to our specifications;
and
|
|
•
|
Develop
marketing tools and plans to promote product sales, including labels
and
graphic designs, promotional brochures and providing speakers to
promote
the
products.
|
Our
management and key personnel have many years experience in developing and
selling nutritional products to domestic and international marketers, including
direct marketers, health food stores and mass market merchandisers.
Our
largest customers accounted for 29% and 16% for the year ended March 31, 2008
and 23% and 15% of our net sales for the year ended March 31, 2007.
Our
Strategy
We
are a
developer, formulator and supplier of natural-based products, designed to
enhance human and animal health. We develop, formulate over-the-counter topical
creams, nutritional and skin care products marketed globally through multiple
channels of distribution. Our strategy involves:
•
Continuing
to develop innovative and proprietary nutritional and skin care
products;
•
Continuing
to offer "turnkey" services, including product development, regulatory
compliance,
manufacturing
and marketing services, to assist our customers in quickly bringing new products
to
market;
•
Marketing
our products internationally by assisting our customers in registering their
products for sale in foreign countries.
To
date,
we have completed the registration of over 25 products in foreign countries,
including Japan, Australia, Norway, Venezuela, Germany, India and Canada. Most
of the products registered contain our proprietary Celadrin® compound.
Industry
Overview
The
dietary supplement industry is highly diversified and intensely competitive.
It
includes companies that manufacture, distribute and sell products that are
generally intended to supplement our daily diets with nutrients that may enhance
the body's performance and well-being. Dietary supplements include vitamins,
minerals, herbs, botanicals, amino acids and compounds. Specific statutory
provisions governing the dietary supplement industry were codified in the
Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act. This act provides new statutory
protections for dietary supplements and allows for statements that inform
consumers of the effect dietary supplements have upon the structure or functions
of the body.
We
expect
that the following factors will contribute to the ongoing growth of the domestic
nutritional supplement industry:
•
The
aging
of the American population, which is likely to cause increased consumption
of
nutritional
supplements;
•
New
product introductions in response to new research supporting the positive
health
effects of certain nutrients;
•
The
nationwide trend toward preventative medicine resulting from rising health
care
costs;
•
Increased
consumer interest in alternative health products such as herb-based nutritional
supplements;
•
A
heightened awareness of the connection between diet and health.
Nutritional
supplements are sold primarily through:
•
Mass
market retailers, including mass merchandisers, drug stores, supermarkets
and
discount
stores;
•
Mail
order companies; and
•
Direct
sales organizations, including network marketing companies.
Products
We
offer
a variety of specialized proprietary nutritional formulations, over-the-counter
topical creams, and skin care products. Since beginning operations in February
1999, we have developed and sold over 90 products and formulations to businesses
and organizations that market these products through multiple channels of
distribution, including direct selling, sales to mass market retailers, direct
response radio, nutritional newsletters and medical care professionals. Our
product formulations may be developed by our customers, co-developed by us
and
our customers or developed exclusively by us for the customer.
Our
leading product is Celadrin®, a nutritional supplement compound comprised of a
complex of fatty acid esters which plays a role in human and animal joint health
and scientifically supported by our clinical studies. For the year ended March
31, 2008, approximately 74% of our revenue, was generated from the sale of
various formulations containing Celadrin®. We offer Celadrin® as part of a
formulated branded or private label product and also as a branded ingredient
to
be used by our wholesale customers in their own product formulations.
A
number
of safety and efficacy studies have been conducted on Celadrin®'s principal
composition, cetylated fatty acids. Studies have been presented at international
scientific conferences, with two studies having been published in the Journal
of
Rheumatology and one study published in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning
Research. We are continuing research to determine Celadrin®'s effects on the
body, including any role it may play in providing support for the normal
functioning of muscles and joints. We produce a wide range of formulas using
the
Celadrin® compounds and market these formulations through multiple distribution
channels. Our wholesale customers resell Celadrin® and other formulated products
under their own labels and trade names. We do not own or have any ownership
interest in the labels or trade names under which these products are sold.
Using
multiple manufacturing processes to produce Celadrin®, we offer the product to
our customers in soft gel capsule, tablet, two-piece capsules and topical cream
forms.
In
January 2005 our Celadrin® compound was approved by the government of India as a
prescription drug for treating joint pain. Previously, in August 2002 we entered
into an exclusive purchase and supply agreement with Cymbiotics to distribute
Celadrin® to hospitals and clinics in India and certain other countries. The
agreement expired on December 31, 2005 and was replaced by a letter agreement
in
February 2006.
In
June
2004 we entered into an agreement with Proprietary Nutritionals Inc. to globally
promote and market our Celadrin® compound on a non-exclusive basis throughout
the world, except India and China. In 2007, we renegotiated and extended the
agreement.
We
use
paid consultants who are medical doctors, scientific research consultants,
independent scientific researchers and laboratories and universities to assist
us in the development and testing of our products. We believe Celadrin® will
continue to be our principal compound. We intend to expand the number of
customers who use this compound in formulas and to develop other formulas for
new customers.
In
addition to Celadrin®, which we sell in many formulations including an oral
product, a cream, and as a pet product, we have also developed other natural
based products designed to address specific health issues, including compounds
and formulations involving a proprietary blend of fruit and vegetable extracts
which represented approximately 12% of our sales and a weight loss product
which
represented approximately 13% of our sales for the year ended March 31, 2008.
We
also
are at the early stage of developing therapies for the treatment of inflammatory
conditions, such as periodontal disease. We have conducted in-vivo and in-vitro
efficacy and safety studies on our drug compound for the treatment of gum
disease including periodontitis.
Raw
Materials and Manufacturing
We
develop and formulate proprietary, natural based, nutritional supplements,
over-the-counter topical creams and skin care products but do not manufacture
any of these products. We currently purchase ingredients from suppliers for
delivery to manufacturers chosen by us. We have an agreement with our sole
supplier of Celadrin® to purchase sufficient quantities of the compound to meet
our anticipated needs through January 2012. We believe this agreement can be
extended although we can give no such assurance. All other ingredients can
be
obtained from a number of suppliers, although the loss of any supplier could
adversely affect our business.
We
use a
number of manufacturers to combine ingredients furnished by our suppliers into
our nutritional and skin care products. By outsourcing product manufacture,
we
eliminate the capital required to manufacture our own products and increase
the
flexibility of our manufacturing resources. We have written confidentiality
and
exclusivity agreements with key manufacturers and believe suitable replacement
manufacturers are available. However, the loss of a manufacturer could adversely
affect our business.
Marketing
and Distribution.
We
market
our products to customers in multiple channels of distribution. Our marketing
strategy consists of:
•
Continuing to offer our proprietary products to existing customers while
seeking new customers, emphasizing those engaged in the direct selling and
mass
marketing of nutraceutical supplements and other nutraceutical products;
•
Continuing to assist our customers in designing new nutritional, topical, and
skin care products using our formulations;
•
Continuing to design marketing materials, provide marketing spokespersons and
offering other value added services to assist customers in expanding their
sales
of our product;
•
Developing and offering new products to direct marketing and mass marketing
companies;
•
Offering products for distribution through medical and nutritional
oriented professionals;
•
Offering products for distribution through direct response radio and television.
We
will
continue to offer our customers a turn key approach to their product needs.
This
approach emphasizes providing the customer with the support necessary to allow
them to sell our products, including providing the scientific studies required
by U.S. and foreign regulators, tailoring our product formulations specifically
for each customer, obtaining approvals in foreign countries for our customers
to
market there, providing full marketing support for the products, including
product information, product descriptions and speakers to discuss products
at
customer conventions and seminars and arranging for manufacture and shipment
of
the products according to customer instructions.
Approximate
sales by principal geographic area (as a percentage of sales) for fiscal years
ended March 31 were as follows:
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
sales
|
|
|
88.2
|
%
|
|
96.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
India
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Taiwan
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Total
foreign sales
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
sales
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
All
of
our operating assets are located within the United States. While sales to
certain geographic areas generally vary from year to year, we do not expect
that
changes in the geographic composition of sales will have a material adverse
effect on operations.
Competition
The
nutritional supplement and skin care industries are large and intensely
competitive. We compete generally with companies that manufacture and market
competitive nutritional products in each of our product lines, including
companies such as Twin Labs, Weider Nutrition, IVC Industries and Perrigo.
We
also compete with companies that supply nutritional products to direct
distribution companies, such as Leiner Health, Natural Alternatives and
Vitatech. We also compete with companies that develop and sell skin care
products, such as West Coast Cosmetics, CA Botana and Cosmetic Products
International.
Competitive
factors in the nutritional supplement and skin care markets include product
effectiveness, scientific validation, proprietary formulations, price, quality
of products, reliability of product delivery and marketing services offered
to
customers. We believe we compete favorably with respect to each of these
factors. Nevertheless, most of our competitors have longer operating histories,
wider product offerings, greater name recognition and financial resources than
do we. However, we believe our turnkey approach of offering our customers
significant regulatory and marketing support, as well as unique, scientifically
validated products, improves our competitive position.
Government
Regulation
In
both
the United States and foreign markets, we are subject to extensive laws and
governmental regulations at the federal, state and local levels. For example,
we
are subject, directly or indirectly, to regulations pertaining to:
•
Dietary ingredients;
•
The manufacturing, packaging, labeling, promotion, distribution, importation,
sale and storage of our products;
•
Product claims, labeling and advertising (including direct claims and
advertising by us as well as claims in labeling and advertising by others,
for
which we may be held responsible);
•
Transfer pricing and similar regulations that affect the level of foreign
taxable income and customs duties; and
•
Taxation, which in some instances may impose an obligation on us to collect
taxes and maintain appropriate records.
The
dietary ingredients, manufacturing, packaging, storing, labeling, advertising,
promotion, distribution and sale of our products are subject to regulation
by
one or more governmental agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration,
the Federal Trade Commission, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the
Department of Agriculture, the Department of Customs, the Patent and Trademark
Office, and the Environmental Protection Agency. Our activities are, or may
be,
regulated by various agencies of the states, localities and foreign countries
in
which our products are manufactured, distributed and/or sold. The FDA, in
particular, regulates the ingredients, manufacture, packaging, storage,
labeling, promotion, distribution and sale of foods, dietary supplements and
over-the-counter drugs, such as those we distribute. We and our suppliers are
required by FDA regulations to meet relevant current good manufacturing practice
guidelines for the preparation, packing and storage of foods and drugs. The
FDA
has also published proposed rules for the establishment of good manufacturing
practices for dietary supplements, but it has not yet issued a proposal rule.
The FDA conducts unannounced inspections of companies that manufacture,
distribute and sell dietary supplements, issues warning letters for rule
violations found during these inspections and refers matters to the U.S.
Attorney and Justice Department for prosecution under the Federal Food, Drug
and
Cosmetic Act. There can be no assurance that the FDA will not question our
labeling or other operations in the future.
The
Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act revised the provisions governing
dietary ingredients and labeling of dietary supplements. The legislation created
a new statutory class of "dietary supplements." This new class includes
vitamins, minerals, herbs, botanicals, other dietary substances to supplement
the daily diet, and concentrates, metabolites, constituents, extracts and
combinations thereof. The legislation requires no federal pre-market approval
for the sale of dietary ingredients that were on the market before October
15,
1994. Since cetylated fatty acids, the primary ingredient in Celadrin®, was on
the market prior to October 15, 1994, we have not been required to provide
the
FDA with any proof as to safety or efficacy of Celadrin®. Dietary ingredients
first marketed after October 15, 1994 may not be distributed or marketed in
interstate commerce unless:
•
The manufacturer has proof that the dietary ingredient has been present in
the food supply as an article used for food and in a form in which the food
has
not been chemically altered, or
•
The manufacturer supplies the FDA with proof to the FDA's satisfaction of the
dietary ingredient's
safety.
Manufacturers
and distributors of dietary supplements may include statements of nutritional
support, including structure and function claims, on labels and in advertising
if:
•
The claims are corroborated by "competent and reliable scientific evidence"
consistent with FTC standards for advertising review;
•
The claims for labels and labeling are filed in a certified notice with the
FDA
no later than 30 days after first market use of the claims;
•
The manufacturer retains substantiation that the claims are truthful and
non-misleading;
•
Each claim on labels and in labeling is cross-referenced by an asterisk to
a
mandatory FDA
disclaimer.
The
majority of the products marketed, or proposed to be marketed, by us are
classified as dietary supplements. In September 1997, the FDA issued regulations
governing the labeling and marketing of dietary supplement products. The
regulations cover:
•
The identification of dietary supplements and their nutrition and
ingredient labeling;
•
The terminology to be used for nutrient content claims, health claims and
statements of nutritional support, including structure and function claims;
•
Labeling requirements for dietary supplements for which "high potency" and
"antioxidant" claims are made;
•
Notification procedures for statements of nutritional support, including
structure and function
claims,
on dietary supplement labels and in their labeling;
•
Pre-market notification procedures for new dietary ingredients in dietary
supplements.
Dietary
supplements are subject to federal laws dealing with drugs and regulations
imposed by the FDA. Those laws regulate, among other things, health claims,
ingredient labeling and nutrition content claims characterizing the level of
nutrient in the product. They also prohibit the use of any health claim for
dietary supplements, unless the health claim is supported by significant
scientific agreement and is pre-approved by the FDA. A federal court has ruled
that the FDA must authorize health claims presented to the agency in health
claims petitions unless they are inherently misleading and must rely on
disclaimers to eliminate any potentially misleading connotation conveyed by
a
claim. The court also held that even claims not supported by significant
scientific agreement must be allowed if disclaimers can correct misleading
connotations.
Prior
to
permitting sales of our products in foreign markets, we may be required to
obtain an approval, license or certification from the country's ministry of
health or comparable agency. The approval process generally would require us
to
present each product and product ingredient to appropriate regulators and,
in
some instances, arrange for testing of products by local technicians for
ingredient analysis. These approvals may be conditioned on reformulation of
our
products or may be unavailable with respect to certain products or certain
ingredients. We must also comply with product labeling and packaging regulations
that vary from country to country.
The
Federal Trade Commission, which exercises jurisdiction over the marketing
practices and advertising of products similar to those we offer, has in the
past
several years instituted enforcement actions against several dietary supplement
companies for deceptive marketing and advertising practices. These enforcement
actions have frequently resulted in consent orders and agreements. In certain
instances, these actions have resulted in the imposition of monetary redress
requirements. Importantly, the commission requires that "competent and reliable
scientific evidence" corroborate each claim of health benefit made in
advertising before the advertising is first made. A failure to have that
evidence on hand at the time an advertisement is first made violates federal
law. While we have not been the subject to enforcement action for the
advertising of its products, there can be no assurance that this agency will
not
question our advertising or other operations in the future.
We
believe we are in compliance with all material government regulations which
apply to our products. However, we are unable to predict the nature of any
future laws, regulations, interpretations or applications, nor can we predict
what effect additional governmental regulations or administrative orders, when
and if promulgated, would have on our business in the future. These future
changes could, however, require the reformulation or elimination of certain
products; imposition of additional record keeping and documentation
requirements; imposition of new federal reporting and application requirements;
modified methods of importing, manufacturing, storing or distributing certain
products; and expanded or different labeling and substantiation requirements
for
certain products and ingredients. Any or all of these requirements could harm
our business.
Trademarks
and Patents
We
received a trademark for "Celadrin" in February 2002.
In
March
2003 we filed a patent application for Genepril, seeking approval of claims
for
the prevention and treatment of various types of arthritis and other
inflammatory joint diseases, as well as periodontal, psoriasis, lupus and
cardiovascular conditions. In June 2005 we received notification that the
application had been approved and that a patent could be issued. Subsequent
to
the notification, we requested additional claims be added to the application.
Accordingly, the patent office is continuing its review of our application.
There can be no assurance that others may not develop compounds superior to
Genepril.
Employees
At
March
31, 2008, we had seven full-time employees and four part-time consultants,
including our executive officers.
Facilities
We
conduct our corporate functions and manufacturing, product development, sales
and marketing activities in San Diego, California. We rent 5,426 square feet
of
office space at 10845 Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 105, San Diego, California
92127 under a seven-year lease ending December 2012 for a monthly rent ranging
from a current level of $11,044 increasing annually to $12,673 for the seventh
year. The average monthly rent for the seven-year period is $11,212. In addition
we rent 4,575 square feet of distribution and storage space at 1420 Decision
Street, Suite B, Vista, California 92083 under a three-year lease ending August
31, 2009 for a monthly rent of $3,889. This space is intended to meet our needs
for the foreseeable future.
Litigation
We
are
not aware of any legal proceedings, pending or threatened, to which we are
a
party.
MANAGEMENT
Directors
and Executive Officers
The
following table and biographical summaries set forth information, including
principal occupations and business experience, about our directors and the
executive officer at June 30, 2008:
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
William
P. Spencer
|
|
56
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer, President and Director
|
Debra
L. Spencer
|
|
56
|
|
Secretary,
Treasurer and Director
|
Lowell
W. Giffhorn
|
|
61
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
Derek
C. Boosey
|
|
66
|
|
Vice
President—International
|
Jeffrey
G. McGonegal
|
|
57
|
|
Director
|
Robert
Burg
|
|
51
|
|
Director
|
Barry
S. King
|
|
62
|
|
Director
|
Biographical
Information
William
P. Spencer
has
served as a director and has been our president since January 1999. From
January 1986 to December 1996 he served as chief operating officer,
chief financial officer and executive vice-president of Natural Alternatives
International, Inc., a company engaged in the formulation and production of
encapsulated vitamins and nutrients. He was president of NAI from
December 1996 to October 1998 and was a director from
January 1986 to October 1998. From 1976 to 1988 he was a regional vice
president for San Diego Trust and Savings Bank. Mr. Spencer earned a B.S.
degree in finance and an MBA degree from San Diego State University.
Debra
L. Spencer
has
served as a director and has been our secretary since March 1999 and served
as
our treasurer from March 1999 to July 2005. Her responsibilities also include
product label copy and graphic design in compliance with FDA regulations as
well
as developing marketing materials for our private label products. From 1970
to
1981 she was an Executive Assistant to the Vice President of a local San Diego
bank. She was a homemaker from 1981 to 1987. From 1987 to 1993 she served as
vice president, secretary and treasurer for Vitamin Direct, Inc., a
consumer mail order vitamin company.
Derek
C. Boosey
has
served as our vice-president
—
international
since September 1999. From 1994 to September 1999, he was new business
manager for National Alternatives International, Inc., and from 1990 to
1994 was director of marketing for Athletics Canada. From 1984 to 1990,
Mr. Boosey was a technical advisor to the Korean Ministry of Sports and a
sports and marketing consultant for MKC International. He earned degrees in
physical education from Keele University (England) and Opu University (England)
and is the Senior Olympics world record holder in the triple jump in the age
55
to 60 class.
Barry
S. King
joined
our board in 2003. He was the Director of Marketing for the United States
Olympic Committee from 1987 to 2002. Since 2002, Mr. King has been the Vice
President and General Manager of Triactive America. Mr. King graduated with
a B.A. degree from the University of Colorado in 1969.
Lowell
W. Giffhorn
has
served as our Chief Financial Officer since July 2005. Since October 2005,
Mr.
Giffhorn also has served as the Chief Financial Officer and, since December
2005, has served on the board of directors of Brendan Technologies, Inc., a
publicly held company that provides computer software to the pharmaceutical
and
life science industries. F
rom
November 1996 to June 2005, Mr. Giffhorn was the Chief Financial Officer of
Patriot Scientific Corp., a publicly held semiconductor and intellectual
property company. From June 1992 to August 1996 and from September 1987 to
June
1990 he was the CFO of Sym-Tek Systems, Inc. and Vice President of Finance
for
its successor, Sym-Tek Inc., a supplier of capital equipment to the
semiconductor industry. Mr. Giffhorn obtained a M.B.A. degree from National
University in 1976 and he obtained a B.S. in Accountancy from the University
of
Illinois in 1969. Mr. Giffhorn is also a director and chairman of the audit
committee of DND Technologies, Inc., a publicly held company. Mr. Giffhorn
devotes approximately 50% of his time to our affairs.
Jeffrey
G. McGonegal
joined
our board in 2005. He also serves as the chief financial officer of AspenBio
Pharma, Inc., a publicly-held biomedical company and of Security with Advanced
Technology, Inc., a publicly held security products and services company and
as
senior vice president — finance of Cambridge Holdings, a publicly-held real
estate and business development firm with limited activities, and since 1997,
Mr. McGonegal has served as managing director of McGonegal and Co., a company
engaged in providing accounting and business consulting services. From 1974
to
1997, he was an accountant with BDO Seidman LLP. While at BDO Seidman, Mr.
McGonegal served as managing partner of the Denver, Colorado office. Until
April
2007, following its sale he was also a member of the board of directors of
Applied Medical Devices, Inc., a publicly-held shell company. Mr. McGonegal
received a B.A. degree in accounting from Florida State University and he is
a
certified public accountant licensed in Colorado.
Robert
Burg
joined
our board in 2005. Since 1998, Mr. Burg has been the owner of The Burg Group,
a
business development company based in the sports industry. From 1992 to 1998,
Mr. Burg held several executive level positions, including President from 1995
to 1998, with Royal Grip, Inc., a publicly traded company that designed and
distributed golf club grips and athletic headware. He received a B.A. degree
in
Business from Western State College in 1977.
William
P. Spencer and Debra L. Spencer are married to each other.
Significant
Employees and Consultants
Robert
L.
Hesslink, Jr. Sc.D., Director of Research and Development, coordinates and
evaluates clinical research conducted on our products. Dr. Hesslink
received his Doctorate of Science from the Department of Health Sciences at
Boston University in 1987. Following his 1986 commission into the U.S. Navy
Medical Services Corp., he was stationed at the Naval Medical Research
Institute, Bethesda, MD from 1986 to 1990. During his tenure, Dr. Hesslink
published research pertaining to cold water immersion and cold habituation
in
the Journal of Applied Physiology and the American Journal of Physiology.
Dr. Hesslink has consulted for national and international companies on
research projects directed at applied nutrition and physiology since 1990.
He
has coordinated over 20 studies in the last three years for academic
institutions, including the University of Maryland School of Medicine,
University of California, San Diego, Department of Animal Sciences, Ball State
University, Human Performance Laboratory, University of Utah, Division of Food
Sciences and Nutrition and the Uniform Services University of Health Sciences,
Department of Military Medicine.
Executive
Compensation
There
is
shown below information concerning the compensation of our principal executive
officer and the most highly compensated executive officers whose total
compensation exceeded $100,000 (each a “Named Officer”) for the fiscal years
ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
Name and
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary ($)
|
|
Bonus ($)
|
|
Awards ($)
|
|
Compensation ($)
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
[a]
|
|
[b]
|
|
[c]
|
|
[d]
|
|
[f]
|
|
[i]
|
|
[j]
|
|
William
P. Spencer
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
178,956
|
|
$
|
30,500
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
$
|
9,903
|
|
$
|
239,359
|
|
President,
CEO and Director
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
174,386
|
|
$
|
39,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
9,903
|
|
$
|
223,289
|
|
The
amount included in other compensation during the year ended March 31, 2008,
is a
car allowance paid to Mr. Spencer. We estimate the fair value of the option
issued to Mr. Spencer at the issuance date by using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for
those options issued during the year ended March 31, 2008: dividend yield of
zero percent; expected volatility of 71%, risk-free interest rates of 4.55%;
and
expected life of 5 years.
OUTSTANDING
EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
Name
|
|
Number
|
|
Number
|
|
Option
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
of
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
Price
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
[a]
|
|
[b]
|
|
[c]
|
|
[e]
|
|
[f]
|
|
William
P. Spencer
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
Aug.
21, 2010
|
|
President,
CEO and
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
1.95
|
|
|
July
1, 2010
|
|
Director
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
|
May
8, 2012
|
|
Employment
Contracts
We
do not
have employment contracts with any of our executive officers.
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION
Name
|
|
Fees
|
|
Option
|
|
All
Other
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Earned
|
|
Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
($)
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid
In
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[a]
|
|
[b]
|
|
(d)
|
|
[g]
|
|
[h]
|
|
Debra
Spencer
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
$
|
86,371
|
|
$
|
106,371
|
|
Jeffrey
McGonegal
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
$
|
16,000
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
26,000
|
|
Barry
King
|
|
$
|
4,800
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
16,800
|
|
Robert
Burg
|
|
$
|
7,500
|
|
$
|
16,000
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
23,500
|
|
Mrs.
Spencer is an employee and director of ours. The amount reflected as other
compensation is the amount she was paid as an employee. She received no
compensation for being a director.
We
estimate the fair value of the options issued to our directors at the issuance
date by using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following
weighted-average assumptions used for those options issued during the year
ended
March 31, 2008: dividend yield of zero percent; expected volatility of 71%,
risk-free interest rates of 4.55%; and expected life of 5 years.
Stock
Option Plan
In
August 2000 we adopted a Stock Option Plan, which we refer to as the
“Plan,” which provides for the grant of stock options intended to qualify as
“incentive stock options” and “nonqualified stock options” (collectively “stock
options”) within the meaning of Section 422 of the United States Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”). Stock options may be issued to any of our
officers, directors, key employees or consultants.
Under
the
Plan, we have reserved 1,500,000 shares underlying stock options for issuance,
of which 1,249,000 options have been granted to executive officers, employees
and consultants at prices ranging from $.65 to $2.00 per share. The Plan is
administered by the full Board of Directors, who determine which individuals
shall received stock options, the time period during which the stock options
may
be exercised, the number of shares of common stock that may be purchased under
each stock option and the stock option price.
The
per
share exercise price of incentive stock options may not be less than the fair
market value of the common stock on the date the option is granted. The
aggregate fair market value (determined as of the date the stock option is
granted) of the common stock that any person may purchase under an incentive
stock option in any calendar year pursuant to the exercise of incentive stock
options will not exceed $100,000. No person who owns, directly or indirectly,
at
the time of the granting of an incentive stock option, more than 10% of the
total combined voting power of all classes of our stock is eligible to receive
incentive stock options under the Plan unless the stock option price is at
least
110% of the fair market value of the common stock subject to the stock option
on
the date of grant.
No
incentive stock options may be transferred by an optionee other than by will
or
the laws of descent and distribution, and, during the lifetime of an optionee,
the stock option may only be exercisable by the optionee. Except as otherwise
determined by the Board of Directors, stock options may be exercised only if
the
stock option holder remains continuously associated with us from the date of
grant to the date of exercise. The exercise date of a stock option granted
under
the Plan may not be later than ten years from the date of grant. Any stock
options that expire unexercised or that terminate upon an optionee’s ceasing to
be employed by us will become available once again for issuance. Shares issued
upon exercise of a stock option will rank equally with other shares then
outstanding. No stock options will be granted by us at an exercise price less
than 85% of the fair market value of the stock underlying the option on the
date
the option is granted.
Liability
and Indemnification of Officers and Directors
Our
Articles of Incorporation provides that our directors will not be liable for
monetary damages for breach of their fiduciary duty as directors, other than
the
liability of a director for:
|
•
|
A
breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to our company or our
stockholders;
|
|
•
|
Acts
or omissions by the director not in good faith or which involve
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
|
|
•
|
Willful
or negligent declaration of an unlawful dividend, stock purchase
or
redemption; or
|
|
•
|
Transactions
from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.
|
Our
Articles of Incorporation require us to indemnify all persons whom we may
indemnify pursuant to Nevada law to the full extent permitted by Nevada law.
Our
bylaws require us to indemnify our officers and directors and other persons
against expenses, judgments, fines and amounts incurred or paid in settlement
in
connection with civil or criminal claims, actions, suits or proceedings against
such persons by reason of serving or having served as officers, directors,
or in
other capacities, if such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person
reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to our best interests and, in a
criminal action or proceeding, if he had no reasonable cause to believe that
his/her conduct was unlawful. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding
by judgment, order, settlement, conviction or upon a plea of no contest or
its
equivalent shall not, of itself, create a presumption that the person did not
act in good faith and in a manner which he or she reasonably believed to be
in
or not opposed to our best interests or that he or she had reasonable cause
to
believe his or her conduct was unlawful. Indemnification as provided in our
bylaws shall be made only as authorized in a specific case and upon a
determination that the person met the applicable standards of conduct. Insofar
as the limitation of, or indemnification for, liabilities arising under the
Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers, or persons
controlling us pursuant to the foregoing, or otherwise, we have been advised
that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such limitation
or indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities
Act
of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable.
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, DIRECTORS AND
BENEFICIAL
OWNERS OF GREATER THAN 5% OF OUR COMMON STOCK
The
following table sets forth certain information concerning our common stock
ownership as of June 25, 2008, by (1) each person who is known by us to be
the
beneficial owner of more than five percent of our common stock; (2) each of
our
executive officers and directors; and (3) all of our directors and executive
officers as a group. The address of each such stockholder is in care of us
at
10845 Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 105, San Diego, California 92127.
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Amount of Benefical
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
Ownership (1)(2)
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William
P.and Debra L. Spencer (3)
|
|
|
2,918,000
|
|
|
26.2
|
%
|
Gary
J. McAdam (4)
|
|
|
2,988,108
|
|
|
23.9
|
%
|
Estate
of James Scibelli (5)
|
|
|
901,625
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
Barry
S. King (6)
|
|
|
24,000
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robert
Burg (7)
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jeffrey
G. McGonegal (7)
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
*
|
|
Lowell
W. Giffhorn (8)
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
*
|
|
Derek
C. Boosey (9)
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
All
officers and directors as a group (6 persons) (10)
|
|
|
3,377,000
|
|
|
29.3
|
%
|
*
Represents
less than 1%
(1)
|
Reflects
amounts as to which the beneficial owner has sole voting power and
sole
investment power.
|
(2)
|
Includes
stock options and common stock purchase warrants exercisable within
60
days from the date
hereof.
|
(3)
|
Comprised
of 2,740,000 shares and 178,000 stock options. William P. and Debra
Spencer are
husband
and wife and are deemed to share beneficial ownership of these shares
and
options.
|
(4)
|
Comprised
of 1,435,557 shares and 1,552,551 common stock purchase warrants,
all of
which are
owned
by entities controlled by Mr. McAdam.
|
(5)
|
Includes
370,000 shares and 531,625 common stock purchase warrants, all of
which
are owned by
entities
controlled by the estate of Mr. Scibelli.
|
(6)
|
Comprised
of 24,000 stock options.
|
(7)
|
Comprised
of 70,000 stock options.
|
(8)
|
Comprised
of 30,000 shares and 40,000 stock options.
|
(9)
|
Comprised
of 50,000 shares and 175,000 stock
options.
|
(10)
|
Comprised
of 2,820,000 shares and 557,000 stock
options.
|
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining available
|
|
|
|
Number of securities
|
|
|
|
for issuance under
|
|
|
|
to be issued upon
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
equity compensaton
|
|
|
|
exercise of
|
|
exercise price of
|
|
plans (excluding
|
|
|
|
outstanding options,
|
|
outstanding options,
|
|
securities reflected in
|
|
|
|
warrants and rights
|
|
warrants and rights
|
|
column (a))
|
|
Plan
Category
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
plans
approved by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
security
holders
|
|
|
944,000
|
|
$
|
1.76
|
|
|
771,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
plans
not approved
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by
security holders
|
|
|
3,902,957
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,846,957
|
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
|
771,000
|
|
Common
shares issuable on the exercise of common stock warrants have not been approved
by the security holders and, accordingly, have been segregated in the above
table.
SELLING
STOCKHOLDERS
We
have
outstanding and are registering by this prospectus an aggregate of 3,110,710
shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of common stock purchase warrants.
The warrants are comprised of the following:
|
•
|
777,736
Class A warrants exercisable at $0.95 per share issued as
consideration for loans advanced to us in 2000;
|
|
•
|
1,530,000
Class B warrants exercisable at $1.05 per share issued as
consideration for loans advanced to us in 2000;
|
|
•
|
412,500
Class C warrants exercisable at $1.95 per share, issued as a part of
a private placement of our securities in October 2000;
|
|
•
|
100,000
Class D warrants exercisable at $1.70 per share issued for consulting
services;
|
|
•
|
250,000
Class E warrants exercisable at $.65 per share issued as additional
consideration for a $1,000,000 credit facility;
and
|
|
•
|
40,474
warrants exercisable at $0.95 issued to our stockholders of record
as of
September 14, 2000.
|
We
are
registering for resale the common stock underlying all of the above warrants.
The Class A, Class B, Class C, Class D and Class E warrants
and the 40,474 warrants expire in October 2010.
The
following table sets forth the names of the selling stockholders and the number
of shares of our common stock underlying the common stock purchase warrants
held
by each selling stockholder.
The
following shares underlying the warrants may be offered from time to time by
the
selling stockholders named below. The selling stockholders are under no
obligation to sell all or any portion of these shares of our common stock.
Since
the selling stockholders may sell all or part of the shares of common stock
offered in this prospectus, we cannot estimate the number of shares of our
common stock that will be held by the selling stockholders upon termination
of
this offering.
We
have
footnoted below any material relationship between the stockholder and us over
the last three years. The address of each selling stockholder is in care of
our
company at 10845 Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 105, San Diego, California
92127. Asterisks (*) indicate ownership of less than 1%.
Class A
Warrant Holders
Name
|
|
Number of
Shares Underlying Warrants
|
|
Total
Number of
Shares
Owned
|
|
Number of
Shares
Offered for
Sale
|
|
Number of
Shares To Be Owned
Following
The Offering
|
|
Percentage To
Be Owned
Following The
Offering
|
|
Great
Expectations Family Limited Partnership(1)
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
395,000
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
370,000
|
|
|
3.37
|
%
|
Fortune
Seekers Inc.
|
|
|
11,250
|
|
|
73,125
|
|
|
11,250
|
|
|
61,875
|
|
|
*
|
|
Fortune
Seekers Inc.
|
|
|
11,750
|
|
|
170,625
|
|
|
11,750
|
|
|
158,875
|
|
|
1.45
|
%
|
Gulfstream
1998 Irrevocable Trust
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
*
|
|
GJM
Trading Partners, LTD(1)
|
|
|
380,000
|
|
|
1,815,557
|
|
|
380,000
|
|
|
1,435,557
|
|
|
12.66
|
%
|
Thomas
McAdam
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
|
J
Paul Consulting Corp.(3)
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
|
GM/CM
Family Partners, LTD(1)
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
1,485,557
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
1,435,557
|
|
|
13.04
|
%
|
Carol
Scibelli, Executor
|
|
|
15,500
|
|
|
385,500
|
|
|
15,500
|
|
|
370,000
|
|
|
3.37
|
%
|
NFS
FBO Rick Boyles
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
|
NFS
FBO Paula Kay Boyles
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
|
Gary
McAdam TTEE FBO Growth
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
|
Growth
Ventures Inc.
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
|
Kearney
Holdings LLC
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
*
|
|
Total
Class A Warrants
|
|
|
777,736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B
Warrant Holders
Name
|
|
Number of
Shares Underlying Warrants
|
|
Total
Number
of
Shares
Owned
|
|
Number of
Shares
Offered for
Sale
|
|
Number of
Shares To Be Owned Following
The Offering
|
|
Percentage To Be
Owned Following The Offering
|
|
GJM
Trading Partners, LTD(1)
|
|
|
520,000
|
|
|
1,955,557
|
|
|
520,000
|
|
|
1,435,557
|
|
|
12.50
|
%
|
Thomas
McAdam
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
|
Rae
Smolowitz
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robert
McAdam
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
|
Carol
Scibelli, Executor
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
|
J
Paul Consulting Corp.
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
|
Growth
Venture
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
|
Thomas
McAdam
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
|
Helen
Kaplan
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robert
and Christi Kaplan
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
|
Total
Class B Warrants
|
|
|
1,530,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class
C
Warrant Holders
Name
|
|
Number of
Shares
Underlying
Warrants
|
|
Total
Number of
Shares
Owned
|
|
Number of
Shares
Offered for
Sale
|
|
Number
of
Shares To Be
Owned
Following
The Offering
|
|
Percentage
To
Be
Owned
Following The
Offering
|
|
Gary
A. Agron(3)
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
Great
Expectations Family Ltd. Partnership(1)
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
445,000
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
370,000
|
|
|
3.35
|
%
|
Growth
Ventures
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
Growth
Ventures
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
Growth
Ventures
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
290,000
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
|
2.18
|
%
|
Growth
Ventures
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
R.A.
Strahl
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
Carol
Scibelli, Executor
|
|
|
77,500
|
|
|
447,500
|
|
|
77,500
|
|
|
370,000
|
|
|
3.35
|
%
|
GJM
Trading Partners, LTD(1)
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
1,525,557
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
1,435,557
|
|
|
12.99
|
%
|
GJM
Trading Partners, LTD(1)
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
Total
Class C Warrants
|
|
|
412,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class D
Warrant Holders
Name
|
|
Number of
Shares
Underlying
Warrants
|
|
Total
Number of
Shares
Owned
|
|
Number of
Shares
Offered for
Sale
|
|
Number of
Shares To Be
Owned
Following
The Offering
|
|
Percentage To Be
Owned Following
The
Offering
|
|
Carol
Scibelli, Executor
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
470,000
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
370,000
|
|
|
3.35
|
%
|
Total
Class D Warrants
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class E
Warrant Holders
Name
|
|
Number of
Shares
Underlying
Warrants
|
|
Total
Number of
Shares
Owned
|
|
Number of
Shares
Offered for
Sale
|
|
Number of
Shares To Be
Owned
Following
The Offering
|
|
Percentage To Be
Owned Following
The Offering
|
|
GJM
Trading Partners, Ltd.(1)
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
1,560,557
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
1,435,557
|
|
|
12.95
|
%
|
Carol
Scibelli, Executor
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
Total
Class E Warrants
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class
Paper Warrant Holders
Name
|
|
Total
Number of
Shares
Owned
|
|
Number of
Shares
Offered for
Sale
|
|
Number of
Shares To Be
Owned
Following
The Offering
|
|
Percentage
To Be Owned
Following
The Offering
|
|
Gary
McAdam
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
David
Cook
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
Clifford
Goff
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
|
Growth
Ventures Inc. FBO Thomas A. Forti
|
|
|
10,500
|
|
|
10,500
|
|
|
10500
|
|
|
|
|
Gary
McAdam
|
|
|
26,312
|
|
|
26,312
|
|
|
26,312
|
|
|
|
|
Growth
Ventures Inc.
|
|
|
2,402
|
|
|
2,402
|
|
|
2,402
|
|
|
|
|
Deane
Noirot
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
Karlan
Osada
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
Dorthoy
Seely
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
Craig
and Michelle Tracy
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Stock
|
|
|
40,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
5%
or greater stockholder
|
(2)
|
Former
5% stockholder
|
(3)
|
Our
securities counsel
|
Plan
of Distribution
The
shares of our common stock which the selling stockholders or their pledgees,
donees, transferees or other successors in interest may offer for resale will
be
sold from time to time in one or more of the following transactions:
|
•
|
Transactions
on the Bulletin Board or on such other market on which our common
stock
may from time to time be trading;
|
|
•
|
Privately
negotiated transactions;
|
|
•
|
Through
the writing of options on the shares;
|
|
•
|
Any
combination of these transactions.
|
The
sale
price to the public in these transactions may be:
|
•
|
The
market price prevailing at the time of sale;
|
|
•
|
A
price related to the prevailing market price;
|
|
•
|
Such
other price as the selling stockholders determine from time to time.
|
In
the
event that we permit or cause this prospectus to lapse, the selling stockholders
may only sell shares of our common stock pursuant to Rule 144 under the
Securities Act of 1933. The selling stockholders will have the sole and absolute
discretion not to accept any purchase offer or make any sale of these shares
of
our common stock if they deem the purchase price to be unsatisfactory at any
particular time.
The
selling stockholders or their pledges, donees, transferees or other successors
in interest, may also sell these shares of our common stock directly to market
makers acting as principals and/or broker-dealers acting as agents for
themselves or their customers. These broker-dealers may receive compensation
in
the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the selling stockholders
and/or the purchasers of these shares of our common stock for whom such
broker-dealers may act as agents or to whom they sell as principal, or both.
As
to a particular broker-dealer, this compensation might be in excess of customary
commissions. Market makers and block purchasers purchasing these shares of
our
common stock will do so for their own account and at their own risk. It is
possible that a selling stockholder will attempt to sell shares of our common
stock in block transactions to market makers or other purchasers at a price
per
share which may be below the prevailing market price of our common stock. There
can be no assurance that all or any of these shares of our common stock offered
hereby will be issued to, or sold by, the selling stockholders. Upon effecting
the sale of any of these shares of our common stock offered under this
prospectus, the selling stockholders and any brokers, dealers or agents, hereby,
may be deemed “underwriters” as that term is defined under the Securities Act of
1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the rules and regulations
thereunder.
Alternatively,
the selling stockholders may sell all or any part of the shares of our common
stock offered hereby through an underwriter. No selling stockholder has entered
into any agreement with a prospective underwriter and there is no assurance
that
any such agreement will be entered into. If a selling stockholder enters into
an
agreement or agreements with an underwriter, then the relevant details will
be
set forth in a post effective amendment to the registration statement of which
this prospectus is a part. A post effective amendment is a supplement or
revision to this prospectus.
The
selling stockholders and any other persons participating in the sale or
distribution of these shares of our common stock will be subject to applicable
provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules and regulations
thereunder including, without limitation, Regulation M. These provisions
may restrict activities of, and limit the timing of purchases and sales of
any
of these shares of our common stock by, the selling stockholders. Furthermore,
pursuant to Regulation M, a person engaged in a distribution of securities
is prohibited from bidding for, purchasing or attempting to induce any person
to
bid for or purchase our securities for a period beginning five
business days prior to the date of this prospectus until such person is no
longer a selling stockholder. These regulations may affect the marketability
of
these shares of our common stock.
We
will
pay substantially all of the expenses incident to the registration and offering
of our common stock, other than commissions or discounts of underwriters,
broker-dealers or agents.
RELATED
PARTY AND OTHER MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS
GJM
Trading Partners, Ltd., an entity controlled by Gary McAdam, a principal
stockholder, holds exclusive rights to market some of our products through
certain e-commerce distribution channels.
In
January 2005 we entered into a consulting agreement with Business Partners
Operations, LLC., a company in which Mr. McAdam is an officer and principal
stockholder. Under the agreement, Mr. McAdam provides us with business
consulting in the areas of finance and marketing strategies. The agreement
calls
for us to pay a fee of $6,500 per month and can be terminated by either party
with a 30 day notice.
We
believe that the above transactions were fair, reasonable and upon terms at
least as favorable to us as those we might have obtained from unaffiliated
third
parties.
DESCRIPTION
OF CAPITAL STOCK
General
We
are
authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares of common stock, $.001 par value per
share, and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $.001 par value per share.
Common
Stock
We
have
10,960,788 shares of common stock outstanding. The holders of common stock
are
entitled to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a vote of
stockholders, including the election of directors. There is no right to cumulate
votes in the election of directors. The holders of common stock are entitled
to
any dividends that may be declared by the Board of Directors out of funds
legally available therefor subject to the prior rights of holders of preferred
stock and any contractual restrictions we have against the payment of dividends
on common stock. In the event of our liquidation or dissolution, holders of
common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment
of liabilities and the liquidation preferences of any outstanding shares of
preferred stock.
Holders
of common stock have no preemptive rights and have no right to convert their
common stock into any other securities. All of the outstanding shares of common
stock are fully paid and nonassessable.
Preferred
Stock
We
are
authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series
with such designations, voting powers, if any, preferences and relative,
participating, optional or other special rights, and such qualifications,
limitations and restrictions, as are determined by resolution of our Board
of
Directors. The issuance of preferred stock may have the effect of delaying,
deferring or preventing a change in control of our company without further
action by stockholders and could adversely affect the rights and powers,
including voting rights, of the holders of common stock. In certain
circumstances, the issuance of preferred stock could depress the market price
of
the common stock. There are no shares of Preferred Stock outstanding.
Warrants
and Stock Options
We
have
an aggregate of 5,176,957 common stock purchase warrants and stock options
outstanding, comprised of the following:
|
•
|
777,736
Class A warrants exercisable at $0.95 per share issued as
consideration for loans advanced to us in 2000;
|
|
•
|
1,530,000
Class B warrants exercisable at $1.05 per share issued as
consideration for loans advanced to us in 2000;
|
|
•
|
412,500
Class C warrants exercisable at $1.95 per share, issued as a part of
a private placement of our securities in October 2000;
|
|
•
|
100,000
Class D warrants exercisable at $1.70 per share issued for consulting
services;
|
|
•
|
1,067,250
Class E warrants exercisable at $.65 to $3.45 per share issued as
additional consideration for a $1,000,000 credit facility and for
services
rendered from 2001-2008;
|
|
•
|
1,249,000
stock options issued to employees, executive officers and consultants;
and
|
|
•
|
40,471
warrants exercisable at $0.95 per share to be issued to 11 stockholders
of
record as of September 14, 2000; and
|
We
are
registering for resale the common stock underlying only the warrants which
were
outstanding as of the original filing of this prospectus. The Class A,
Class B, Class C, Class D and Class E and 40,471 warrants expire
in October 2010.
Limitation
on Liability
Our
certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that a director shall not be
personally liable to us or our stockholders for any action taken or any failure
to act to the full extent permitted under Nevada law. The effect of this
provision is to eliminate our rights and the rights of our stockholders, through
stockholders’ derivative suits on our behalf, to recover monetary damages from a
director for breach of the fiduciary duty of care as a director, including
breaches resulting from negligent or grossly negligent behavior. This provision
does not limit or eliminate any stockholder or us from seeking non-monetary
relief such as an injunction or rescission in the event of a breach of a
director’s duty of care or to seek monetary damages for (i) a violation of
criminal law, (ii) unlawful payment of dividends or other distribution
under Nevada law, (iii) a transaction in which a director derived an
improper personal benefit, (iv) willful misconduct, or (v) reckless,
malicious or wanton acts.
Dividends
We
have
not declared any cash dividends on our common stock and do not intend to declare
dividends in the foreseeable future. We intend to use our available funds for
the development of our business. There are no material restrictions limiting,
or
likely to limit, our ability to pay dividends on our common stock.
Transfer
Agent
Interwest
Transfer Co., Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah, is our transfer and warrant agent.
SHARES
ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
We
have
10,960,788 common shares outstanding which are freely tradeable or saleable
under Rule 144. We also may have up to 5,176,957 shares outstanding which may
be
issued upon exercise of our common stock purchase warrants and stock options.
In
general, under Rule 144, a person, or persons whose shares are aggregated,
who owns shares that were purchased from us, or any affiliate of ours, at least
six months previously, may sell such shares subject to manner of sale
provisions, notice requirements and the availability of current public
information about us, including a person who may be deemed our affiliate, is
entitled to sell within any three month period 1% of the then outstanding shares
of our common stock.
Any
person who is not deemed to have been our affiliate at any time during the
90 days preceding a sale, and who owns shares within the definition of
“restricted securities” under Rule 144 under the Securities Act that were
purchased from us, or any affiliate of ours, at least one year previously,
is entitled to sell such shares under Rule 144(k) without regard to
the volume limitations, manner of sale provisions, public information
requirements or notice requirements.
Future
sales of restricted common stock under Rule 144 or otherwise or of the
shares which we are registering under this prospectus could negatively impact
the market price of our common stock. We are unable to estimate the number
of
shares that may be sold in the future by our existing stockholders or the
effect, if any, that sales of shares by such stockholders will have on the
market price of our common stock prevailing from time to time. Sales of
substantial amounts of our common stock by existing stockholders could adversely
affect prevailing market prices.
EXPERTS
Our
financial statements included in this prospectus as of and for the years
ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007 have been included in reliance on
the report of HJ Associates & Consultants LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm, given on the authority of this firm as experts in accounting
and auditing.
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
None.
LEGAL
MATTERS
The
validity of our common stock offered hereby will be passed upon for us by the
Law Office of Gary A. Agron, Greenwood Village, Colorado. Mr. Agron owns
50,000 Class C warrants.
WHERE
YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We
have
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C. 20549,
a
post-effective amendment to our registration statement on Form S-1 under the
Securities Act of 1933 with respect to our common stock offered by this
prospectus. This prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth
in
the registration statement and the exhibits to the registration statement.
For
further information with respect to Imagenetix, Inc., and our common stock
offered hereby, reference is made to the registration statement and the exhibits
filed as part of the registration statement. We are required to file periodic
reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including quarterly
reports, annual reports which include our audited financial statements and
proxy
statements. The registration statement, including exhibits thereto, and all
of
our periodic reports may be inspected without charge at the Securities and
Exchange Commission’s principal office in Washington, D.C., and copies of all or
any part thereof may be obtained from the Public Reference Section of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549,
after payment of fees prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
You
may obtain additional information regarding the operation of the Public
Reference Section by calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at
1-800-SEC-0330. The Securities and Exchange Commission also maintains a World
Wide Web site which provides online access to reports, proxy and information
statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically
with the Securities and Exchange Commission at the address: http://www.sec.gov.
Index
to Consolidated Financial Statements
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets, March 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operation, for the years ended March 31, 2008 and
2007
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of Stockholders' Equity, for the years ended March 31,
2008 and
2007
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows, for the years ended March 31, 2008 and
2007
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
F-7-F-25
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2008 (unaudited) and March
31,
2008
|
|
F-26
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended
June 30,
2008 and 2007 (unaudited)
|
|
F-27
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended
June 30,
2008 and 2007 (unaudited)
|
|
F-28
|
|
|
|
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
F
-29-F 33
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To
the
Board of Directors
Imagenetix,
Inc.
San
Diego, California
We
have
audited the consolidated balance sheets of Imagenetix, Inc. and subsidiary
as of
March 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In
our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Imagenetix,
Inc. and subsidiary as of March 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We
were
not engaged to examine management's assertion about the effectiveness of
Imagenetix, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31,
2008 included in the accompanying Form 10-KSB and, accordingly, we do not
express an opinion thereon.
/S/
HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP
|
|
HJ
Associates & Consultants, LLP
|
Salt
Lake City, Utah
|
June
23, 2008
|
Imagenetix,
Inc.
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
March
31,
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,022,555
|
|
$
|
958,896
|
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
|
|
765,492
|
|
|
1,576,641
|
|
Inventories,
net
|
|
|
1,109,845
|
|
|
1,284,458
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
252,138
|
|
|
384,217
|
|
Income
tax receivable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
269,140
|
|
Deferred
tax asset
|
|
|
862,497
|
|
|
109,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
4,012,527
|
|
|
4,583,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and equipment,
net
|
|
|
112,190
|
|
|
125,456
|
|
Long-term
prepaid expenses
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
218,155
|
|
|
551,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$
|
4,384,872
|
|
$
|
5,260,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$
|
713,324
|
|
$
|
368,089
|
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
72,301
|
|
|
64,265
|
|
Customer
deposits
|
|
|
63,216
|
|
|
136,645
|
|
Contract
payable
|
|
|
46,200
|
|
|
49,970
|
|
Short
term license payable
|
|
|
34,259
|
|
|
31,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
929,300
|
|
|
650,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long
term license payable
|
|
|
2,980
|
|
|
37,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities
|
|
|
932,280
|
|
|
687,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized: none
outstanding
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Common
stock, $.001par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized: 10,960,788 and
10,871,400 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively
|
|
|
10,960
|
|
|
10,871
|
|
Capital
in excess of par value
|
|
|
12,481,407
|
|
|
10,734,945
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(9,039,775
|
)
|
|
(6,173,054
|
)
|
Total
stockholders' equity
|
|
|
3,452,592
|
|
|
4,572,762
|
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
|
$
|
4,384,872
|
|
$
|
5,260,603
|
|
See
accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm, summary
of
accounting policies and notes to consolidated financial
statements.
Imagenetix,
Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Operation
Years
Ended March 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
5,569,593
|
|
$
|
5,596,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
3,344,034
|
|
|
2,969,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
2,225,559
|
|
|
2,627,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
2,456,192
|
|
|
1,407,996
|
|
Payroll
expense
|
|
|
1,037,775
|
|
|
712,945
|
|
Consulting
expense
|
|
|
961,349
|
|
|
1,339,515
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
4,455,316
|
|
|
3,460,456
|
|
Operating
(loss)
|
|
|
(2,229,757
|
)
|
|
(832,733
|
)
|
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income
|
|
|
32,182
|
|
|
32,885
|
|
Interest
expense (Note 6)
|
|
|
(4,367
|
)
|
|
(6,791
|
)
|
Other
income (expense)
|
|
|
27,815
|
|
|
26,094
|
|
Loss
before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,201,942
|
)
|
|
(806,639
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
from taxes (Note 10)
|
|
|
(425,300
|
)
|
|
(139,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,776,642
|
)
|
$
|
(667,639
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.16
|
)
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
See
accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm, summary
of
accounting
polices
and notes to consolidated financial statements.
Imagenetix,
Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders' Equity
Years
Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Capital in excess
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
Stockholders'
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
of Par Value
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
April 1, 2006
|
|
|
10,721,400
|
|
|
10,721
|
|
|
10,342,395
|
|
|
(5,398,019
|
)
|
|
4,955,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of common stock for services at $.94 per share
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
140,850
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
141,000
|
|
Purchase
price of warrants
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
Value
of warrants issued
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
143,054
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
143,054
|
|
Non-cash
dividend issued to certain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
warrant
holders
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
107,396
|
|
|
(107,396
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
Net
(loss) for the year ended March 3l, 2007
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(667,639
|
)
|
|
(667,639
|
)
|
Balance
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
10,871,400
|
|
$
|
10,871
|
|
$
|
10,734,945
|
|
$
|
(6,173,054
|
)
|
$
|
4,572,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
exercised at $1.00 to $1.10 per share
|
|
|
89,388
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
90,799
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
90,888
|
|
Cash
received on extension of warrants
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
155,536
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
155,536
|
|
Value
of stock options and warrants issued
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
410,048
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
410,048
|
|
Non-cash
dividend issued to certain warrant holders
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,090,079
|
|
|
(1,090,079
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
Net
(loss) for the year ended March 3l, 2008
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1,776,642
|
)
|
|
(1,776,642
|
)
|
Balance
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
10,960,788
|
|
$
|
10,960
|
|
$
|
12,481,407
|
|
$
|
(9,039,775
|
)
|
$
|
3,452,592
|
|
See
accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm, summary
of
accounting policies and notes to consolidated finacial
statements.
Imagenetix,
Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
Years
Ended March 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,776,642
|
)
|
$
|
(667,639
|
)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net (loss) to cash provided (used) by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
and depreciation
|
|
|
50,334
|
|
|
41,410
|
|
Provision
for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
Provision
for inventory obsolescence
|
|
|
15,454
|
|
|
(61,380
|
)
|
Non
cash expense related to issuance of warrants and stock
options
|
|
|
410,048
|
|
|
143,054
|
|
Stock
issued for services
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
141,000
|
|
Change
in deferred taxes
|
|
|
(425,300
|
)
|
|
(100,497
|
)
|
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in accounts receivable
|
|
|
796,149
|
|
|
(805,443
|
)
|
(Increase)
decrease in employee receivable
|
|
|
3,177
|
|
|
2,870
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in inventory
|
|
|
159,159
|
|
|
518,390
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in other assets
|
|
|
86,904
|
|
|
(147,591
|
)
|
Increase
(decrease) in accounts payable
|
|
|
345,234
|
|
|
(372,372
|
)
|
Increase
(decrease) in accrued liabilities
|
|
|
8,036
|
|
|
12,316
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in customer deposits
|
|
|
(73,429
|
)
|
|
88,160
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in income taxes payable
|
|
|
269,140
|
|
|
348,430
|
|
Net
cash (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(116,736
|
)
|
|
(819,292
|
)
|
Investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of office equipment and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
(19,014
|
)
|
|
(51,838
|
)
|
Trademarks,
patents and infomercial
|
|
|
(11,612
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(30,626
|
)
|
|
(51,838
|
)
|
Financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from extension of warrants
|
|
|
155,536
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds
from exercise of warrants
|
|
|
90,888
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds
from issuance of warrant
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
Proceed
from contracts payable
|
|
|
95,605
|
|
|
102,143
|
|
Payments
on contracts payable
|
|
|
(99,375
|
)
|
|
(52,173
|
)
|
Payments
on patent license financed
|
|
|
(31,633
|
)
|
|
(29,210
|
)
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
211,021
|
|
|
22,010
|
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
63,659
|
|
|
(849,120
|
)
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
, beginning of year
|
|
|
958,896
|
|
|
1,808,016
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents,
end of year
|
|
$
|
1,022,555
|
|
$
|
958,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
4,367
|
|
$
|
6,791
|
|
Income
taxes
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Non
Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash
dividend issued to certain warrant holders
|
|
$
|
1,090,079
|
|
$
|
107,396
|
|
Non-cash
expense related to issuance of warrants and options
|
|
$
|
410,048
|
|
$
|
143,054
|
|
Stock
issued for services
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
141,000
|
|
See
accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm, summary
of
accounting policies and notes to consolidated financial
statements.
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to
the Consolidated Financial Statements
March
31,
2008 and 2007
NOTE
1 -
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements represent the accounts of
Imagenetix, Inc. [“Parent”] organized under the laws of the State of Nevada on
March 28, 1988; and its subsidiary Imagenetix, Inc [“Subsidiary”] organized
under the laws of the state of Colorado on July 26, 1996 and its subsidiary
Imagenetix [“Imagenetix CA”] organized under the laws of the State of California
on January 7, 1999. We are engaged in the business of developing and marketing
nutritional supplements and skin care products primarily in domestic
markets.
On
March
23, 1999, Subsidiary completed an exchange agreement with Imagenetix CA wherein
Subsidiary issued 3,900,000 shares of its common stock in exchange for all
of
the outstanding common stock of Imagenetix CA. The Acquisition was accounted
for
as a recapitalization of Imagenetix CA as the shareholders of the Imagenetix
CA
controlled the combined entity after the acquisition. There was no adjustment
to
the carrying values of the assets or liabilities of the Subsidiary or Imagenetix
CA as a result of the recapitalization.
During
October 2000, the Subsidiary entered into a definitive merger agreement and
plan
of reorganization with Parent. The transaction was accounted for as a
recapitalization of the Subsidiary, wherein the Subsidiary became a wholly
owned
subsidiary of the Parent. After giving effect to the preceding transaction,
the
parent had 8,550,000 shares of common stock, 3,183,750 warrants, and 525,000
options outstanding. In connection with the reverse acquisition, the Parent
changed its name to Imagenetix, Inc.
We
have,
at the present time, not paid any dividends, and any dividends that may be
paid
in the future will depend upon our financial requirements and other relevant
factors.
Consolidation
All
significant intercompany transactions between the Parent, Subsidiary, and
Imagenetix CA have been eliminated in consolidation.
Accounting
Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that effect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues
and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimated by management.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
For
purposes of the financial statements, we consider all highly liquid debt
investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. At various times throughout the year, we have exceeded federally
insured limits.
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to
the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
March
31,
2008 and 2007
Accounts
receivable
Accounts
receivable are carried at the expected net realizable value. The allowance
for
doubtful accounts is based on management’s assessment of the collectibility of
specific customer accounts and the aging of the accounts receivable. If there
were a deterioration of a major customer’s creditworthiness, or actual defaults
were higher than historical experience, our estimates of the recoverability
of
amounts due to us could be overstated, which could have a negative impact on
operations.
Inventory
Inventory
is carried at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by the first-in
first-out method. Indirect overhead costs are allocated to inventory.
Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment are stated at cost. Expenditures for major renewals and
betterments that extend the useful lives of property and equipment are
capitalized, upon being placed in service. Expenditures for maintenance and
repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is computed over the
estimated useful life of three to seven years, except leasehold improvements
which are depreciated over the lesser of the remaining lease life or the life
of
the asset, using the straight-line method. We follow the provisions of the
Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards ("SFAS") No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-lived
Assets." Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be held
and
used by us are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. We continuously evaluate the recoverability of our long-lived
assets based on estimated future cash flows and the estimated fair value of
such
long-lived assets, and provide for impairment if such undiscounted cash flows
are insufficient to recover the carrying amount of the long-lived
asset.
Trademarks
and Patents
Patents
and trademarks are carried at cost less accumulated amortization and are
amortized over their estimated useful lives of from 8 to 17 years for patents
and 10 years for trademarks. The carrying value of patents and trademarks is
periodically reviewed and impairments, if any, are recognized when the expected
future benefit to be derived from individual intangible assets is less than
its
carrying value determined based on the provisions of SFAS No. 144 as discussed
above.
Stock
Based Compensation
Effective
January 1, 2006, we adopted FASB Statement No. 123R, “Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation” (“SFAS 123R”). SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to
employees, including grants of employee stock options and restricted stock,
to
be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. Under
SFAS
123R, the pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS 123R are no
longer an alternative to financial statement recognition.
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to
the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
March
31,
2008 and 2007
We
have
selected the Black-Scholes method of valuation for share-based compensation
and
have adopted the modified prospective transition method under SFAS 123R, which
requires that compensation cost be recorded, as earned, for all unvested stock
options outstanding at the beginning of the first quarter of adoption of SFAS
123R. As permitted by SFAS 123R, prior periods have not been restated. The
charge is being recognized in non cash compensation, which is included in
stock-based compensation expense, on a straight-line basis over the remaining
service period after the adoption date based on the options’ original estimate
of fair value. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company applied the
intrinsic-value-based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 25 (“APB 25”), “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.”
Under this method, compensation cost was recorded only if the market price
of
the underlying stock on the grant date exceeded the exercise price. As permitted
by SFAS 123, the Company elected the disclosure only requirements of SFAS 123.
The fair-value based method used to determine historical pro forma amounts
under
SFAS 123 was similar in most respects to the method used to determine
stock-based compensation expense under SFAS 123R.
Revenue
Recognition
We
recognize revenue in accordance with the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 104, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” (SAB104), Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 48, “Revenue Recognition When Right
of Return Exists” (SFAS 48), and Emerging Issues Task Force Abstract (EITF)
No. 01-9, “Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer
(Including a Reseller of the Vendor’s Products.” SAB 104 requires that four
basic criteria be met before revenue can be recognized: 1) there is evidence
that an arrangement exists; 2) delivery has occurred; 3) the fee is fixed or
determinable; and 4) collectibility is reasonably assured. SFAS 48 states that
revenue from sales transactions where the buyer has the right to return the
product shall be recognized at the time of sale only if (1) the seller’s
price to the buyer is substantially fixed or determinable at the date of sale;
(2) the buyer has paid the seller, or the buyer is obligated to pay the
seller and the obligation is not contingent on resale of the product;
(3) the buyer’s obligation to the seller would not be changed in the event
of theft or physical destruction or damage of the product; (4) the buyer
acquiring the product for resale has economic substance apart from that provided
by the seller; (5) the seller does not have significant obligations for
future performance to directly bring about resale of the product by the buyer;
and (6) the amount of future returns can be reasonably estimated. We
recognize revenue upon determination that all criteria for revenue recognition
have been met. The criteria are usually met at the time title passes to the
customer, which usually occurs upon shipment. Revenue from shipments where
title
passes upon delivery is deferred until the shipment has been delivered.
We
account for payments made to customers in accordance with EITF 01-09, which
states that cash consideration (including a sales incentive) given by a vendor
to a customer is presumed to be a reduction of the selling prices of the
vendor’s products or services and, therefore, should be characterized as a
reduction of revenue when recognized in the vendor’s income statement, rather
than a sales and marketing expense. We have various agreements with customers
that provide for discounts and rebates. These agreements are classified as
a
reduction of revenue. Certain other costs associated with customers that meet
the requirements of EITF 01-09 are recorded as sales and marketing expense.
Vendor considerations recorded as a reduction of sales were $893,000 and
$232,000 for the years ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to
the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
March
31,
2008 and 2007
We
guarantee customer satisfaction. Our policy requires the customer to return
the
unused product to the retailer from whom they originally purchased it. We pay
the retailer for the returned product plus a handling cost. We periodically
assess the adequacy of this policy and will record a liability as necessary.
For
the year ended March 31, 2008, there were no returns that would suggest a
liability needed to be recorded.
We
review
gross revenue for estimated returns of private label contract manufacturing
products and direct-to-consumer products. The estimated returns are based upon
the trailing six months of private label contract manufacturing gross sales
and
our historical experience for both private label contract manufacturing and
direct-to-consumer product returns. However, the estimate for product returns
does not reflect the impact of a large product recall resulting from product
nonconformance or other factors as such events are not predictable nor is the
related economic impact estimable. For the year ended March 31, 2008 there
were
no returns that would suggest a liability needed to be recorded.
As
part
of the services we provide to our private label contract manufacturing
customers, we may perform, but are not required to perform, certain research
and
development activities related to the development or improvement of their
products. While our customers typically do not pay directly for this service,
the cost of this service is included as a component of the price we charge
to
manufacture and deliver their products.
Income
Taxes
We
account for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” This statement requires an
asset and liability approach for accounting for income taxes (See Note
10).
Earnings
Per Share
The
computation of earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of
shares outstanding during the period presented in accordance with Statement
of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, “Earnings Per Share” (See Note
11).
Recently
Enacted Accounting Standards
In
December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued SFAS
No. 161,
Disclosures
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 133.
This
standard requires companies to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and
why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and
related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related
interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items
affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.
This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
and
interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application
encouraged. The Company has not yet adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 161,
but
does not expect it to have a material impact on its consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to
the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
March
31,
2008 and 2007
In
December 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 110 regarding
the use of a "simplified" method, as discussed in SAB No. 107 (SAB 107), in
developing an estimate of expected term of "plain vanilla" share options in
accordance with SFAS No. 123 (R),
Share-Based
Payment
. In
particular, the staff indicated in SAB 107 that it will accept a company's
election to use the simplified method, regardless of whether the company has
sufficient information to make more refined estimates of expected term. At
the
time SAB 107 was issued, the staff believed that more detailed external
information about employee exercise behavior (e.g., employee exercise patterns
by industry and/or other categories of companies) would, over time, become
readily available to companies. Therefore, the staff stated in SAB 107 that
it
would not expect a company to use the simplified method for share option grants
after December 31, 2007. The staff understands that such detailed information
about employee exercise behavior may not be widely available by December 31,
2007. Accordingly, the staff will continue to accept, under certain
circumstances, the use of the simplified method beyond December 31, 2007. The
Company currently uses the simplified method for “plain vanilla” share options
and warrants, and will assess the impact of SAB 110 for fiscal year 2009. It
is
not believed that this will have an impact on the Company’s consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
—an
amendment of ARB No. 51. This statement amends ARB 51 to establish
accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a
subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the
consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated
financial statements. Before this statement was issued, limited guidance existed
for reporting noncontrolling interests. As a result, considerable diversity
in
practice existed. So-called minority interests were reported in the consolidated
statement of financial position as liabilities or in the mezzanine section
between liabilities and equity. This statement improves comparability by
eliminating that diversity. This statement is effective for fiscal years, and
interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15,
2008 (that is, January 1, 2009, for entities with calendar year-ends). Earlier
adoption is prohibited. The effective date of this statement is the same as
that
of the related Statement 141 (revised 2007). The Company will adopt this
Statement beginning April 1, 2009. It is not believed that this will have an
impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.
In
December 2007, the FASB, issued FAS No. 141 (revised 2007),
Business
Combinations.
’This
Statement replaces FASB Statement No. 141,
Business
Combinations
,
but
retains the fundamental requirements in Statement 141. This
Statement establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer: (a)
recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree; (b) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business
combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and (c) determines what
information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate
the nature and financial effects of the business combination. This statement
applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date
is
on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on
or
after December 15, 2008. An entity may not apply it before that date. The
effective date of this statement is the same as that of the related FASB
Statement No. 160,
Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
. The
Company will adopt this statement beginning April 1, 2009. It is not believed
that this will have an impact on the
Company’s
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to
the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
March
31,
2008 and 2007
In
February 2007, the FASB, issued SFAS No. 159,
The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities
—Including
an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This standard permits an
entity to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items
at fair value. This option is available to all entities. Most of the provisions
in FAS 159 are elective; however, an amendment to FAS 115
Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities
applies
to all entities with available for sale or trading securities. Some requirements
apply differently to entities that do not report net income. SFAS No. 159 is
effective as of the beginning of an entities first fiscal year that begins
after
November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of the
previous fiscal year provided that the entity makes that choice in the first
120
days of that fiscal year and also elects to apply the provisions of SFAS No.
157
Fair
Value Measurements
. The
Company will adopt SFAS No. 159 beginning April 1, 2008 and is currently
evaluating the potential impact the adoption of this pronouncement will have
on
its consolidated financial statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair
Value Measurements
This
statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value
in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements. This statement applies under other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the Board having
previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is
the
relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, this statement does not require
any
new fair value measurements. However, for some entities, the application of
this
statement will change current practice. This statement is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007,
and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is
encouraged, provided that the reporting entity has not yet issued financial
statements for that fiscal year, including financial statements for an interim
period within that fiscal year. The Company will adopt this statement April
1,
2008, and it is not believed that this will have an impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
NOTE
2 –
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Accounts
receivable are carried at the expected realizable value. Accounts receivable
consisted of the following:
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to
the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
March
31,
2008 and 2007
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable - trade
|
|
$
|
870,492
|
|
$
|
1,666,641
|
|
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(105,000
|
)
|
|
(90,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
|
$
|
765,492
|
|
$
|
1,576,641
|
|
NOTE
3 –
INVENTORY
Inventory
consisted of the following:
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw
materials
|
|
$
|
824,807
|
|
$
|
797,498
|
|
Finished
products
|
|
|
295,615
|
|
|
401,895
|
|
Boxes,
labels, tubes & bottles
|
|
|
139,965
|
|
|
220,153
|
|
|
|
|
1,260,387
|
|
|
1,419,546
|
|
Reserve
for obsolescence
|
|
|
(150,542
|
)
|
|
(135,088
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
1,109,845
|
|
$
|
1,284,458
|
|
NOTE
4 -
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
The
following is a summary of equipment, at cost, less accumulated
depreciation:
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office
equipment
|
|
$
|
72,632
|
|
$
|
66,456
|
|
Lease-hold
improvements
|
|
|
139,191
|
|
|
126,353
|
|
|
|
|
211,823
|
|
|
192,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
99,633
|
|
|
67,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
112,190
|
|
$
|
125,456
|
|
Depreciation
expense for the year ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was $32,280 and $23,956,
respectively.
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to
the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
March
31,
2008 and 2007
NOTE
5 –
OTHER ASSETS
The
following is a summary of other assets included on the face of the balance
sheet:
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
$
|
13,032
|
|
$
|
13,032
|
|
Patent
|
|
|
172,965
|
|
|
161,353
|
|
Deferred
tax asset
|
|
|
87,700
|
|
|
415,100
|
|
|
|
|
273,697
|
|
|
589,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less
accumulated amortization
|
|
|
55,542
|
|
|
37,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
218,155
|
|
$
|
551,998
|
|
For
the
year ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 amortization expense was $18,054 and $17,454,
respectively. The estimated future amortization expense related to intangible
assets as of March 31, 2008 is as follows:
Year
Ended March 31.
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
19,858
|
|
2010
|
|
|
19,858
|
|
2011
|
|
|
19,858
|
|
2012
|
|
|
19,757
|
|
2013
and thereafter
|
|
|
51,124
|
|
NOTE
6
-
LICENSE
AND ROYALTY PAYABLE
In
May,
2005, we entered into an agreement with EHP Products, Inc. acquiring a
non-exclusive world-wide license to make, use and sell products relating to
Cetyl Myristoleate covered under U.S. Patent No. 5,569,676. The agreement
provides for payments of $3,000 per month from May, 2005 through April, 2009,
at
which time EHP Products, Inc. has agreed to convey ownership of the patent
to
us.
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to
the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
March
31,
2008 and 2007
As
of
March 31, 2008 the following obligations were outstanding related to this
license:
|
|
As of March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patent
License and Royalty Payable
|
|
$
|
37,239
|
|
$
|
68,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less
current portion
|
|
|
34,259
|
|
|
31,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long
term license payable
|
|
$
|
2,980
|
|
$
|
37,239
|
|
NOTE
7 –
LEASES OBLIGATIONS
Operating
Lease
We
entered into a seven-year building lease for our office commencing in January
2006 and expiring in December 2012. In addition we entered into a three-year
lease for warehouse space commencing in September 2006 and expiring in August
2009. Lease expense for the years ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 amounted to
$165,207 and $160,902, respectively. The following is a schedule of minimum
annual rental payments for the next five years.
Years
ending March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
184,491
|
|
2010
|
|
|
158,993
|
|
2011
|
|
|
143,206
|
|
2012
|
|
|
148,218
|
|
2013
|
|
|
114,056
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
748,964
|
|
NOTE
8 –
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGINCIES
Contingencies
We
are
involved in litigation from time to time in the normal course of business.
Management
believes there are no such claims, which would have a material effect on our
financial position.
Other
agreements
We
routinely enter into contracts and agreements with suppliers, manufacturers,
consultants, product marketing, and sales representatives in the normal course
of doing business. These agreements can be either short or long term and are
normally limited to specific products and marketing opportunities. We are
committed
to purchase a minimum of $1,680,000 each year through 2012 of the major
ingredient in our current products. However, we have in the past entered into
waivers, which have eliminated a portion of the purchase
commitment.
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to
the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
March
31,
2008 and 2007
NOTE
9 –
CAPITAL STOCK
Preferred
Stock
We
have
authorized 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $.001 par value, with such
rights, preferences and designations and to be issued in such series as
determined by the Board of Directors. No shares are issued and outstanding
at
March 31, 2008.
Common
Stock
The
Company has authorized 50,000,000 shares of common stock at $.001 par value.
At
March 31, 2008, the Company had 10,960,788 shares of common stock issued and
outstanding.
During
the year ended March 31, 2008, we issued 89,388 shares of common stock for
proceeds of $90,888. The shares were issued upon shareholders exercising
warrants with exercise prices ranging from $1.00 to $1.10 per
share.
During
the year ended March 31, 2007, we issued 150,000 shares of common stock to
one
individual in exchange for services he will provide to the company. The services
to be performed were valued based on the price of the common stock on the date
of issuance, $0.94 per share or $141,000 in the aggregate. This amount is being
amortized over 24 months, the life of the contract under which the services
are
to be provided, as non-cash expense.
Stock
Bonus Plan
During
the year ended March 31, 2000, our board of directors adopted a stock bonus
plan. The plan provides for the granting of awards of up to 724,500 shares
of
common stock to officers, directors, consultants and employees. Awards under
the
plan will be granted as determined by the board of directors. As of March 31,
2008, 499,500 shares have been granted under the plan.
Warrants
A
summary
of the status of the warrants granted under various agreements at March 31,
2008
and 2007, and changes during the years then ended is presented
below:
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to
the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
March
31,
2008 and 2007
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Price
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding,
April 1, 2006
|
|
|
4,107,100
|
|
|
1.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
Outstanding,
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
4,357,100
|
|
$
|
1.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
1.30
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(89,388
|
)
|
|
1.02
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/
Expired
|
|
|
(539,755
|
)
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding,
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
3,902,957
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable,
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
4,357,100
|
|
$
|
1.26
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable,
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
3,902,957
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
|
|
|
During
the year ended March 31, 2008, we issued warrants to three individuals for
services valued at $140,588 which we expensed to general and administrative
expenses. We estimated the fair value of each warrant at the issuance date
by
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumptions used for the year ended March 31, 2008: dividend yield of zero
percent; expected volatility of 71%, risk-free interest rates of 4.55%; and
expected lives of 5 years.
During
the year ended March 31, 2007, we issued warrants to one individual for services
valued at $143,054 which we are amortizing to general and administrative
expenses over 24 months. We estimated the fair value of each warrant at the
issuance date by using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following
weighted-average assumptions used for the year ended March 31, 2007: dividend
yield of zero percent; expected volatility of 71%, risk-free interest rates
of
4.83%; and expected lives of 5 years.
During
the year ended March 31, 2008, we offered warrant holders with warrants
scheduled to expire on October 23, 2007, the right to extend their warrants
for
three additional years in exchange for a warrant extension fee of $0.05 per
warrant share, such amount to be reduced from the existing exercise price,
and a
right for us to call the warrants should our common stock trade at a 20% premium
to the revised exercise price for 10 business days. As a result of this offer,
53 warrants with exercise prices ranging from $0.75 to $2.00 totaling 3,110,710
warrant shares were extended until October 23, 2010 at an accumulated fee of
$155,536. We determined that the offering was a modification of warrants which
were originally issued as part of equity transactions. We calculated the
incremental fair value of the modified warrants by using the Black Sholes
pricing model and recorded a non-cash dividend of $1,090,079 for the year ended
March 31, 2008.
We
estimated the fair value of the non-cash dividends declared during the year
ended March 31, 2008 by using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following
weighted average assumptions: dividend yield of zero percent; expected
volatility of 55%; risk free interest rate of 3.09%; and expected lives of
3
years.
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to
the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
March
31,
2008 and 2007
During
the year ended March 31, 2007, we extended the expiration date on warrants
exercisable for up to 415,375 shares of common stock to October 23, 2007. These
warrants were issued in 2000 and 2001 as part of an equity unit sale. By the
terms of the warrants, we were to use our best efforts to maintain a
registration statement under which the holders could resell the common shares
on
the exercise of the warrants. Since we failed to maintain a timely registration
statement, we decided to extend the expiration date of the warrants. Due to
this
modification, we recorded non-cash dividends of $107,396 for the year ended
March 31, 2007. We estimated the fair value of the non-cash dividends declared
during the year ended March 31, 2007 by using the Black-Scholes pricing model
with the following weighted average assumptions: dividend yield of zero percent;
expected volatility of 70% to 72%; risk free interest rate of 4.56% to 4.87%;
and expected lives of 13 to 18 months.
A
summary
of the status of the warrants granted under the various agreements at
March
31,
2008, are presented in the table below:
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Range of
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Number
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Number
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Prices
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Life
|
|
Price
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.65-0.95
|
|
|
1,068,210
|
|
|
2.56
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
1,068,210
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
$
|
1.00-1.05
|
|
|
1,780,000
|
|
|
2.46
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
1,780,000
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
$
|
1.20-1.70
|
|
|
522,250
|
|
|
2.76
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
|
522,250
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
$
|
1.95
|
|
|
457,500
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
$
|
1.95
|
|
|
457,500
|
|
$
|
1.95
|
|
$
|
2.33-3.45
|
|
|
74,997
|
|
|
2.17
|
|
$
|
2.85
|
|
|
74,997
|
|
$
|
2.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,902,957
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
|
3,902,957
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
Stock
Option Plan
In
August 2000 we adopted a Stock Option Plan, which we refer to as the
"Plan," which provides for the grant of stock options intended to qualify as
"incentive stock options" and "nonqualified stock options" (collectively "stock
options") within the meaning of Section 422 of the United States Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"). Stock options may be issued to any of our
officers, directors, key employees or consultants.
Under
the
Plan, we have reserved 1.5 million shares underlying stock options for
issuance, of which 1,139,000 options have been granted to executive officers,
employees and consultants at prices ranging from $.86 to $2.00 per share. The
Plan is administered by the full Board of Directors, who determine which
individuals shall receive stock options, the time period during which the stock
options may be exercised,
the
number of shares of common stock that may be purchased under each stock option
and the stock option price.
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to
the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
March
31,
2008 and 2007
The
per
share exercise price of incentive stock options may not be less than the fair
market value of the common stock on the date the option is granted. The
aggregate fair market value (determined as of the date the stock option is
granted) of the common stock that any person may purchase under an incentive
stock option in any calendar year pursuant to the exercise of incentive stock
options will not exceed $100,000. No person who owns, directly or indirectly,
at
the time of the granting of an incentive stock option, more than 10% of the
total combined voting power of all classes of our stock is eligible to receive
incentive stock options under the Plan unless the stock option price is at
least
110% of the fair market value of the common stock subject to the stock option
on
the date of grant.
No
incentive stock options may be transferred by an optionee other than by will
or
the laws of descent and distribution, and, during the lifetime of an optionee,
the stock option may only be exercisable by the optionee. Except as otherwise
determined by the Board of Directors, stock options may be exercised only if
the
stock option holder remains continuously associated with us from the date of
grant to the date of exercise. The exercise date of a stock option granted
under
the Plan may not be later than ten years from the date of grant. Any stock
options that expire unexercised or that terminate upon an optionee's ceasing
to
be employed by us will become available once again for issuance. Shares issued
upon exercise of a stock option will rank equally with other shares then
outstanding. No stock options will be granted by us at an exercise price less
than 85% of the fair market value of the stock underlying the option on the
date
the option is granted. During the years ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 there
were
options granted to purchase up to 350,000 and 0, respectively, shares of common
stock and there were no options exercised.
A
summary
of the status of the options granted under the Company’s 2000 stock option plan
and other agreements at March 31, 2008 and 2007, and changes during the years
then ended is presented below:
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to
the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
March
31,
2008 and 2007
|
|
Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Price
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding,
April 1, 2006
|
|
|
1,129,000
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding,
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,129,000
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(535,000
|
)
|
$
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding,
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
944,000
|
|
$
|
1.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable,
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,129,000
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable,
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
769,000
|
|
$
|
1.87
|
|
|
|
|
A
summary
of the status of the options granted under the stock option plan and other
agreements at March 31, 2008, are presented in the table below:
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Range of
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Number
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Number
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Prices
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Life
|
|
Price
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
4.09
|
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
$
|
1.95
|
|
|
249,000
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
$
|
1.95
|
|
|
249,000
|
|
$
|
1.95
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
245,000
|
|
|
2.39
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
245,000
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
$
|
2.35
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
2.47
|
|
$
|
2.35
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
$
|
2.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
944,000
|
|
|
2.99
|
|
$
|
1.76
|
|
|
769,000
|
|
$
|
1.87
|
|
NOTE
10 -
INCOME TAXES
At
March
31, 2008 and 2007, the total of all deferred tax assets was approximately
$950,197 and $524,897, respectively. There are no deferred tax liabilities
for
either year.
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to
the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
March
31,
2008 and 2007
The
temporary differences gave rise to the following deferred tax asset
(liability):
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess
of financial accounting over tax depreciation
|
|
$
|
21,700
|
|
$
|
17,100
|
|
State
income tax benefits
|
|
|
211,597
|
|
|
12,497
|
|
Net
operating loss carryforward
|
|
|
541,400
|
|
|
-
|
|
Allowance
for obsolete inventory
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
53,800
|
|
Allowance
for bad debts
|
|
|
41,800
|
|
|
35,800
|
|
Valuation
of stock options and warrants
|
|
|
66,000
|
|
|
398,000
|
|
Vacation
accrual
|
|
|
7,700
|
|
|
7,700
|
|
Net
deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
950,197
|
|
$
|
524,897
|
|
The
reconciliation of income tax from continuing operations computed at the U.S.
federal statutory tax rate to our effective rate is as follows for the year
ended:
March
31,
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
income tax expense computed at the Federal statutory rate
|
|
$
|
(748,700
|
)
|
$
|
(274,300
|
)
|
State
income tax expense net of Federal benefit
|
|
|
(153,100
|
)
|
|
(46,300
|
)
|
Other-
permanent differences
|
|
|
476,500
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
Other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
177,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$
|
(425,300
|
)
|
$
|
(139,000
|
)
|
The
components of federal income tax (benefit) expense from continuing operations
consisted of the following for the year ended:
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to
the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
March
31,
2008 and 2007
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
income tax expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
(97,300
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
current tax expense
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
(97,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
tax expense (benefit) resulted from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess
of financial accounting over tax depreciation
|
|
$
|
(4,500
|
)
|
$
|
(11,200
|
)
|
State
income tax benefits
|
|
|
(199,200
|
)
|
|
35,100
|
|
Valuation
of stock options and warrants
|
|
|
332,000
|
|
|
(73,700
|
)
|
Net
operating loss
|
|
|
(541,400
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
Allowance
for obsolete inventory
|
|
|
(6,200
|
)
|
|
24,400
|
|
Vacation
accrual
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
Allowance
for bad debts
|
|
|
(6,000
|
)
|
|
(15,900
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
deferred tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$
|
(425,300
|
)
|
$
|
(41,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(425,300
|
)
|
$
|
(139,000
|
)
|
Deferred
income tax expense (benefit) results primarily from the reversal of temporary
timing differences between tax and financial statement income.
At
March
31, 2008, the Company has net operating loss carry forwards for income tax
reporting purposes of approximately $1,592,000 and $2,394,000 available to
offset future federal and California taxable income, respectively. Based on
current tax law, the Company’s federal net operating loss carry forward will
begin to expire in the year ending March 31, 2028 and the state net operating
loss carry forward will begin to expire in the year ending March 31,
2016.
We
periodically evaluate the likelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets,
and adjust the carrying amount of the deferred tax assets by the valuation
allowance to the extent the future realization of the deferred tax assets is
not
judged to be more likely than not. We consider many factors when assessing
the
likelihood of future realization of our deferred tax assets, including our
recent cumulative earnings experience by taxing jurisdiction, expectations
of
future taxable income or loss, the carry forward periods available to us for
tax
reporting purposes, and other relevant factors.
At
March
31, 2008, based on the weight of available evidence, including cumulative losses
in recent years and expectations of future taxable income, the Company
determined that it was more likely that its deferred tax assets would be
realized and has not recorded a valuation allowance associated with its deferred
tax assets.
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to
the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
March
31,
2008 and 2007
On
April
1, 2007, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation
No. 48,
Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income taxes
(FIN
48). FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model of how a company should
recognize, measure, present, and disclose in its financial statements uncertain
tax positions that the company has taken or expects to take on a tax
return. FIN 48 states that a tax benefit from an uncertain position
may be recognized if it is "more likely than not" that the position is
sustainable, based upon its technical merits. The tax benefit of a qualifying
position is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent
likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority having
full knowledge of all relevant information.
Upon
adoption of FIN 48, there was no impact to the Company's consolidated financial
statements. The Company estimates that the unrecognized tax benefit
will not change significantly within the next twelve months. The
Company will continue to classify income tax penalties and interest as part
of
general and administrative expense in its statements of
operations. Accrued interest on uncertain tax positions is not
significant. There are no penalties accrued as of March 31,
2008. The following table summarizes the open tax years for each
major jurisdiction:
Jurisdiction
|
|
Open
Tax
Years
|
|
Federal
|
|
2004
– 2006
|
|
California
|
|
2004
- 2006
|
|
As
the
Company has significant net operating loss carry forwards, even if certain
of
the Company’s tax positions were disallowed, it is not foreseen that the Company
would have to pay any taxes in the near future. Consequently, the Company does
not calculate the impact of interest or penalties on amounts that might be
disallowed.
NOTE
11 –
EARNINGS PER SHARE
The
following data show the amounts used in computing earnings per share of common
stock for the period presented:
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to
the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
March
31,
2008 and 2007
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) available to common shareholders (Numerator)
|
|
$
|
(1,776,642
|
)
|
$
|
(667,639
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding used in basic income
per share
during the period (Denominator)
|
|
|
10,936,657
|
|
|
10,745,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding used in diluted income
per
share during the period (Denominator)
|
|
|
10,936,657
|
|
|
10,745,647
|
|
At
March
31, 2008, we had options to purchase 944,000 shares of common stock at prices
ranging from $1.30 to $2.35 per share and warrants to purchase 3,902,957 shares
of common stock at prices ranging from $0.88 to $2.85 per share that were not
included in the computation of earnings per share because their effects are
anti-dilutive due to a loss being recognized for the year then
ended.
At
March
31, 2007, we had options to purchase 1,129,000 shares of common stock at prices
ranging from $0.86 to $2.00 per share and warrants to purchase 4,387,100 shares
of common stock at prices ranging from $0.70 to $3.45 per share that were not
included in the computation of earnings per share because their effects are
anti-dilutive due to a loss being recognized for the year then
ended.
NOTE
12 –
CONCENTRATIONS
Sales
During
the year ended March 31, 2008, we had two significant customers which accounted
for 29%, and 16% of sales.
During
the year ended March 31, 2007, we had two significant customers which accounted
for 23% and 15% of sales.
Supplier
We
also
have a single source and exclusive supplier arrangement with the supplier of
a
specific raw material, which is used as part of products which accounts for
approximately 74% of our sales. The interruption of raw materials provided
by
this supplier or the loss of a significant customer would adversely affect
our
business and financial condition.
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to
the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
March
31,
2008 and 2007
During
the year ended March 31, 2008, we had one significant vendor who accounted
for
29% of cost of sales.
During
the year ended March 31, 2007, we had one significant vendor which accounted
for
12% of cost of sales.
Accounts
Receivable
At
March
31, 2008, we had two customers which accounted for 16% and 12% of our accounts
receivable balances.
At
March
31, 2007, we had two customers which accounted for 47% and 16% of our accounts
receivable balances.
NOTE
13 –
SUBSEQUENT EVENT
In
May
2008, we received $2,100,000 ($1,750,000 after costs) as a result of entering
into a settlement agreement with a company we alleged was infringing on the
Celadrin trademark. In addition, we entered into a supply agreement with the
same company whereby we will provide Celadrin for use in their
products.
Imagenetix,
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
June 30,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
2,065,256
|
|
$
|
1,022,555
|
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
|
|
1,249,603
|
|
|
765,492
|
|
Inventories,
net
|
|
|
1,246,851
|
|
|
1,109,845
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
170,121
|
|
|
252,138
|
|
Deferred
tax asset
|
|
|
390,097
|
|
|
862,497
|
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
5,121,928
|
|
|
4,012,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
|
|
104,652
|
|
|
112,190
|
|
Long-term
prepaid expenses
|
|
|
39,000
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
231,705
|
|
|
218,155
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$
|
5,497,285
|
|
$
|
4,384,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$
|
974,378
|
|
$
|
713,324
|
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
91,878
|
|
|
72,301
|
|
Customer
deposits
|
|
|
262,666
|
|
|
63,216
|
|
Contract
payable
|
|
|
23,100
|
|
|
46,200
|
|
Short
term license payable
|
|
|
28,929
|
|
|
34,259
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
1,380,951
|
|
|
929,300
|
|
Long
term license payable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,980
|
|
Total
Liabilities
|
|
|
1,380,951
|
|
|
932,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
authorized:
none outstanding
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Common
stock, $.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
authorized:
10,960,788 issued and outstanding at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June
30 and March 31, 2008
|
|
|
10,960
|
|
|
10,960
|
|
Capital
in excess of par value
|
|
|
12,558,073
|
|
|
12,481,407
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(8,452,699
|
)
|
|
(9,039,775
|
)
|
Total
stockholders' equity
|
|
|
4,116,334
|
|
|
3,452,592
|
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
|
$
|
5,497,285
|
|
$
|
4,384,872
|
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
Imagenetix,
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
1,394,358
|
|
$
|
1,126,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
819,711
|
|
|
536,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
574,647
|
|
|
590,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
605,472
|
|
|
646,509
|
|
Payroll
expense
|
|
|
372,190
|
|
|
356,497
|
|
Consulting
expense
|
|
|
345,761
|
|
|
251,524
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
1,323,423
|
|
|
1,254,530
|
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
|
|
(748,776
|
)
|
|
(664,143
|
)
|
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income
|
|
|
7,742
|
|
|
6,944
|
|
Settlement
income
|
|
|
1,785,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(690
|
)
|
|
(1,327
|
)
|
Other
income
|
|
|
1,792,052
|
|
|
5,617
|
|
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
1,043,276
|
|
|
(658,526
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
456,200
|
|
|
(223,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss)
|
|
$
|
587,076
|
|
$
|
(435,526
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
10,960,788
|
|
|
10,871,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
11,021,173
|
|
|
10,871,400
|
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
Imagenetix,
Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
Operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
587,076
|
|
$
|
(435,526
|
)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to
cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
and depreciation
|
|
|
10,188
|
|
|
12,176
|
|
Provision
for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Provision
for inventory obsolescence
|
|
|
(12,003
|
)
|
|
22,105
|
|
Non
cash expense related to issuance of warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
granting of stock options
|
|
|
76,666
|
|
|
304,607
|
|
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in accounts receivable
|
|
|
(484,111
|
)
|
|
656,053
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in employee receivable
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
764
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in inventories
|
|
|
(125,003
|
)
|
|
(152,389
|
)
|
(Increase)
decrease in other assets
|
|
|
84,171
|
|
|
(11,434
|
)
|
(Increase)
decrease in deferred taxes
|
|
|
456,200
|
|
|
(223,000
|
)
|
Increase
(decrease) in accounts payable
|
|
|
261,055
|
|
|
57,410
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in accrued liabilities
|
|
|
19,577
|
|
|
11,319
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in customer deposits
|
|
|
199,450
|
|
|
375,000
|
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
1,074,111
|
|
|
632,085
|
|
Investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(12,840
|
)
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(12,840
|
)
|
Financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
on contracts payable
|
|
|
(23,100
|
)
|
|
(24,985
|
)
|
Payments
on patent license financed
|
|
|
(8,310
|
)
|
|
(7,673
|
)
|
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(31,410
|
)
|
|
(32,658
|
)
|
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,042,701
|
|
|
586,587
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
,
beginning of period
|
|
|
1,022,555
|
|
|
958,896
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents,
end of period
|
|
$
|
2,065,256
|
|
$
|
1,545,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
690
|
|
$
|
1,327
|
|
Income
taxes
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
The
consolidated financial statements of Imagenetix, Inc. ("Imagenetix") presented
herein have been prepared pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission for quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. These statements should be read in conjunction
with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included
in
Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2008.
In
the
opinion of management, the interim consolidated financial statements reflect
all
adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary for a fair statement of
the
results for interim periods. Operating results for the three month period is
not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year.
Earnings
Per Share
We
follow
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 128, "Earnings per
Share." Under SFAS No. 128, basic earnings per share is calculated as earnings
available to common stockholders divided by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is calculated as net
income divided by the diluted weighted average number of common shares. The
diluted weighted average number of common shares is calculated using the
treasury stock method for common stock issuable pursuant to outstanding stock
options and common stock warrants. See Note 6 for discussion of commitments
to
issue additional shares of common stock and warrants.
Stock
Based Compensation
Effective
January 1, 2006, we adopted FASB Statement No. 123R, “Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation” (“SFAS 123R”). SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to
employees, including grants of employee stock options and restricted stock,
to
be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values.
We
have
selected the Black-Scholes method of valuation for share-based compensation.
The
charge is recognized in non cash compensation, which is included in stock-based
compensation expense, on a straight-line basis over the remaining service period
based on the options’ original estimate of fair value.
We
apply
SFAS No. 123 in valuing options granted to consultants and estimate the fair
value of such options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The fair
value is recorded as consulting expense as services are provided. Options
granted to consultants for which vesting is contingent based on future
performance are measured at their then current fair value at each period end,
until vested.
2.
|
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
|
In
March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS No. 161”). SFAS
No. 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirement for FASB Statement
No. 133, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS
No. 133”). It requires enhanced disclosure about (i) how and why an
entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how derivative instruments and
related hedge items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related
interpretations, and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedge
items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash
flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for the Company as of April 1, 2009.
The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS 161 on its consolidated
financial position and results of operations.
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
In
May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles.” SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of
accounting principles and provides entities with a framework for selecting
the
principles used in preparation of financial statements that are presented in
conformity with GAAP. The current GAAP hierarchy has been criticized because
it
is directed to the auditor rather than the entity, it is complex, and it ranks
FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts, which are subject to the
same
level of due process as FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Standards,
below
industry practices that are widely recognized as generally accepted but that
are
not subject to due process. The Board believes the GAAP hierarchy should be
directed to entities because it is the entity (not its auditors) that is
responsible for selecting accounting principles for financial statements that
are presented in conformity with GAAP. The adoption of FASB 162 is not expected
to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and
results of operations.
In
April 2008, the FASB issued FSP 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets”, (FSP 142-3). FSP 142-3 amends the factors that should be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine
the
useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets”. FSP 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently assessing the impact of
FSP 142-3 on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
3.
ACCOUNTS
RECEIVABLE
Accounts
receivable are carried at the expected realizable value. Accounts receivable
consisted of the following:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable - trade
|
|
$
|
1,354,603
|
|
$
|
870,492
|
|
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(105,000
|
)
|
|
(105,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
|
$
|
1,249,603
|
|
$
|
765,492
|
|
At
June
30, 2008, we had two customers which accounted for 46% and 19% of our accounts
receivable balances.
At
March
31, 2008, we had two customers which accounted for 16% and 12% of our accounts
receivable balances.
For
the
three months ended June 30, 2008, we had two significant customers which
accounted for 48%, and 26% of sales. For the three months ended June 30, 2007,
we had three significant customers which accounted for 28%, 11% and 11% of
sales.
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
4.
INVENTORIES
Inventories
consist of the following:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw
materials
|
|
$
|
940,746
|
|
$
|
824,807
|
|
Finished
products
|
|
|
236,242
|
|
|
295,615
|
|
Boxes,
labels, tubes & bottles
|
|
|
208,402
|
|
|
139,965
|
|
|
|
|
1,385,390
|
|
|
1,260,387
|
|
Reserve
for obsolescence
|
|
|
(138,539
|
)
|
|
(150,542
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
1,246,851
|
|
$
|
1,109,845
|
|
The
following is a summary of intangible assets which are included in “Other Assets”
on the face of the balance sheet:
|
|
June
30,
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
$
|
13,032
|
|
$
|
13,032
|
|
Patent
|
|
|
172,965
|
|
|
172,965
|
|
Deferred
tax asset
|
|
|
103,900
|
|
|
87,700
|
|
|
|
|
289,897
|
|
|
273,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less
accumulated amortization
|
|
|
58,192
|
|
|
55,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
231,705
|
|
$
|
218,155
|
|
6.
EQUITY
TRANSACTIONS
We
recorded non-cash compensation expense for stock options and warrants issued
to
employees and consultants of $76,666 for the three months ended June 30, 2008
and $164,019 for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Also, we recorded
non-cash general and administrative expense for warrants granted to individuals
of $140,588 for the three months ended June 30, 2007.
The
significant assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model to estimate the
compensation and general and administrative expense for the issuance of stock
options and warrants are as follows:
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
Expected
term of options and warrants
|
5 years
|
|
5 years
|
Expected
volatility
|
61%
|
|
71%
|
Expected
dividends
|
None
|
|
None
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
3.36 to 3.54%
|
|
4.55%
|
Forfeitures
|
0%
|
|
0%
|
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
A
summary
of the options outstanding follows:
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Options
|
|
Shares
|
|
Price
|
|
Outstanding
at beginning of year
|
|
|
944,000
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
305,000
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding
at end of the period
|
|
|
1,249,000
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable
at end of the the period
|
|
|
1,096,500
|
|
$
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average fair value of options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
granted
during the period
|
|
|
305,000
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
As
of
June 30, 2008, the unamortized portion of stock compensation expense on all
existing stock options was $54,562.
A
summary
of warrants outstanding follows:
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Warrants
|
|
Shares
|
|
Price
|
|
Outstanding
at beginning of year
|
|
|
3,902,957
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding
at end of the period
|
|
|
3,927,957
|
|
|
1.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable
at end of the the period
|
|
|
3,927,957
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average fair value of warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
granted
during the period
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
7.
INCOME
TAXES
We
file
income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and the state of California.
With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local
or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before
2004.
We
adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,
on April
1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of Interpretation 48, we did not
recognize
an increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits. No unrecognized
tax
benefits are being reported for the three months ended June 30,
2008.
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
Notes
to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Included
in the balance at April 1, 2007, were no tax positions for which the ultimate
deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the
timing of such deductibility. Because of the impact of deferred tax accounting,
other than interest and penalties, the disallowance of the shorter deductibility
period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate
the
payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period.
Our
policy is to recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits
in
interest expense and penalties in operating expenses.
Until
the completion of the resale of the
|
|
|
|
Common
stock included in this prospectus,
|
|
|
|
all
dealers that effect transactions in these
|
|
|
The
Resale of
|
securities,
whether or not participating in
|
|
|
|
this
offering, may be required to deliver
|
|
|
3,110,710
Shares
|
a
prospectus. This is in addition to the
|
|
|
|
dealers’
obligation to deliver a prospectus
|
|
|
Of
|
when
acting as underwriters and with
|
|
|
|
respect
to their unsold allotments or
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
subscriptions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offered
by
|
|
|
|
|
Table
of Contents
|
|
|
Selling
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
About
this Prospectus
|
1
|
|
|
Summary
|
1
|
|
|
Risk
Factors
|
4
|
|
|
Forward
Looking Statements
|
8
|
|
|
Price
Range of Common Stock
|
8
|
|
IMAGENETIX,
INC.
|
Use
of Proceeds
|
9
|
|
|
Capitalization
|
9
|
|
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
9
|
|
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis or
|
|
|
|
Plan
of Operation
|
10
|
|
PROSPECTUS
|
Business
|
20
|
|
|
Management
|
28
|
|
|
Security
Ownership of Executive Officers,
|
|
|
|
Directors
and Beneficial Owners of Greater
|
|
|
|
than
5% of Our Common Stock
|
32
|
|
|
Selling
Stockholders
|
34
|
|
|
Related
Party and Other Material Transactions
|
39
|
|
|
Description
of Capital Stock
|
39
|
|
|
Shares
Eligible for Future Sale
|
41
|
|
|
Experts
|
41
|
|
Subject
to Completion,
|
Changes
In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
|
41
|
|
September
5, 2008
|
Legal
Matters
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where
You Can Find More Information
|
42
|
|
|
Financial
Statements
|
F-1
|
|
|
PART
II
INFORMATION
NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
ITEM
13. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION(1)
SEC
Registration Fee
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
Blue
Sky Filing Fees
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
Blue
Sky Legal Fees
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
Printing
Expenses
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
Legal
Fees
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
Accounting
Fees
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
Miscellaneous
Expenses
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
22,000
|
|
(1)
All
expenses are estimated.
ITEM
14. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Our
bylaws require us to indemnify our officers and directors and other persons
against expenses, judgments, fines and amounts incurred or paid in settlement
in
connection with civil or criminal claims, actions, suits or proceedings against
such persons by reason of serving or having served as officers, directors,
or in
other capacities, if such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person
reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to our best interests and, in a
criminal action or proceeding, if he had no reasonable cause to believe that
his/her conduct was unlawful. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding
by judgment, order, settlement, conviction or upon a plea of no contest or
its
equivalent shall not, of itself, create a presumption that the person did not
act in good faith and in a manner which he or she reasonably believed to be
in
or not opposed to our best interests or that he or she had reasonable cause
to
believe his or her conduct was unlawful. Indemnification as provided in our
bylaws shall be made only as authorized in a specific case and upon a
determination that the person met the applicable standards of conduct. Insofar
as the limitation of, or indemnification for, liabilities arising under the
Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers, or persons
controlling us pursuant to the foregoing, or otherwise, we have been advised
that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such limitation
or indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities
Act
of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable.
ITEM
15. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
During
the last three years, we sold the following securities which were not
registered under the Securities Act, as amended:
(i)
Stock
Issued for Services:
|
|
Date
|
|
Per Share
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Donald
Radcliffe
|
|
|
2/1/07
|
|
$
|
.94
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Expire Date
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Donald
Radcliffe
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
2/1/07
|
|
|
2/1/12
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
Tom
Hall
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
5/2/07
|
|
|
5/2/12
|
|
|
1.30
|
|
Frank
Sajovic
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
5/2/07
|
|
|
5/2/12
|
|
|
1.30
|
|
Gary
McAdam
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
5/2/07
|
|
|
5/2/12
|
|
|
1.30
|
|
Yueling
Chen
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
5/28/08
|
|
|
5/28/13
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
During
the year ended March 31, 2008, we offered warrant holders with warrants
scheduled to expire on October 23, 2007, the right to extend their warrants
for
three additional years in exchange for a warrant extension fee of $0.05 per
warrant share, such amount to be reduced from the existing exercise price,
and a
right for us to call the warrants should our common stock trade at a 20% premium
to the revised exercise price for 10 business days. As a result of this offer,
53 warrants with exercise prices ranging from $0.75 to $2.00 totaling 3,110,710
warrant shares were extended until October 23, 2010 at an accumulated fee of
$155,536.
With
respect to the above securities issuances, the Registrant relied on exemptions
provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
“Securities Act”) and Rule 506 under the Securities Act. No advertising or
general solicitation was employed in offering the securities. The securities
were issued to a limited number of persons all of whom were accredited investors
as that term is defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D under the
Securities Act. All were capable of analyzing the merits and risks of their
investment, acknowledged in writing that they were acquiring the securities
for
investment and not with a view toward distribution or resale, and understood
the
speculative nature of their investment. All securities issued contained a
restrictive legend prohibiting transfer of the shares except in accordance
with
federal securities laws.
ITEM
16. EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No.
|
|
Title
|
3.01
|
|
Articles
of Incorporation of the Registrant (1)
|
3.02
|
|
Bylaws
of the Registrant (1)
|
3.03
|
|
Amendment
to Articles of Incorporation (Name change) (2)
|
4.01
|
|
Stock
Option Plan (6)
|
5.01
|
|
Opinion
of Gary A. Agron regarding legality
|
10.01
|
|
Celadrin®
Supply Agreement with Organic Technologies (2)
|
10.19
|
|
Business
Partners Operations Agreement (4)
|
10.20
|
|
Office
Lease Agreement with Bernardo Gateway Partners (5)
|
10.21
|
|
Patent
License with University of Minnesota
(5)
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Title
|
10.22
|
|
Patent
License with EHP Products, Inc. (5)
|
14
|
|
Code
of Ethics (3)
|
23.01
|
|
Consent
of Gary A. Agron (see 5.01 above)
|
23.02
|
|
Consent
of HJ Associates & Consultants LLP—Independent Registered
Public
Accountants
|
(1)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Registration Statement on Form SB-1, file number
333-87535, filed on September 22, 1999.
|
(2)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2, File Number
333-71756, declared effective on July 26, 2002 and post-effective
amendment No. 1 thereto declared effective on August 25, 2003.
|
(3)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
March
31, 2005.
|
(4)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2, file number
333-123159 declared effective on March 18,
2005.
|
(5)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
March
31, 2006
|
(6)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-8, File Number
333-146318, filed on September 26,
2007.
|
ITEM
17. UNDERTAKINGS
|
The
Registrant hereby undertakes:
|
(a)
That
insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
may
be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant,
the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed
in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for
indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
Registration of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling
person to the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding) is asserted by such director or controlling person in connection
with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion
of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit
to a
court of appropriate jurisdiction the question of whether such indemnification
by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed
by
the final adjudication of such issue.
(b)
That
subject to the terms and conditions of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, it will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission
such supplementary and periodic information, documents and reports as may be
prescribed by any rule or regulation of the Commission heretofore or hereafter
duly adopted pursuant to authority conferred in that section.
(c)
That
any
post-effective amendment filed will comply with the applicable forms, rules
and
regulations of the Commission in effect at the time such post-effective
amendment is filed.
(d)
To
file,
during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective
amendment to this registration statement:
|
|
(i)
|
To
include any prospectus required by section 10(a)(3) of the
Securities Act;
|
|
|
(ii)
|
To
reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective
date of the registration statement (or the most recent post- effective
amendment thereof), which, individually or in the aggregate, represent
a
fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration
statement;
|
|
|
(iii)
|
To
include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution
not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material
change to such information in the registration statement.
|
(e)
That,
for
the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each such
post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities
at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(f)
To
remove
from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities
being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the Offering.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Act, as amended, the Registrant certifies
that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements
of filing Form SB-2 and has caused this Registration Statement to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in San Diego,
California, on September 5, 2008.
|
IMAGENETIX, INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/
WILLIAM
P. SPENCER
William
P. Spencer
Chief
Executive Officer
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Act, as amended, this Registration
Statement has been signed below by the following persons on September 5,
2008.
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
/s/
William P. Spencer
William
P. Spencer
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer, President and Director
|
|
|
|
/s/
Debra L. Spencer
Debra
L. Spencer
|
|
Secretary,
Treasurer and Director
|
|
|
|
/s/
Lowell W. Giffhorn
Lowell
W. Giffhorn
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/
Barry S. King
Barry
S. King
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/
Robert Burg
Robert
Burg
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/
Jeffrey McGonegal
Jeffrey
McGonegal
|
|
Director
|
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit No.
|
|
Title
|
3.01
|
|
Articles
of Incorporation of the Registrant (1)
|
3.02
|
|
Bylaws
of the Registrant (1)
|
3.03
|
|
Amendment
to Articles of Incorporation (Name change) (2)
|
4.01
|
|
Stock
Option Plan (6)
|
5.01
|
|
Opinion
of Gary A. Agron regarding legality
|
10.01
|
|
Celadrin®
Supply Agreement with Organic Technologies (2)
|
10.19
|
|
Business
Partners Operations Agreement (4)
|
10.20
|
|
Office
Lease Agreement with Bernardo Gateway Partners (5)
|
10.21
|
|
Patent
License with University of Minnesota (5)
|
10.22
|
|
Patent
License with EHP Products, Inc. (5)
|
14
|
|
Code
of Ethics (3)
|
23.01
|
|
Consent
of Gary A. Agron (see 5.01 above)
|
23.02
|
|
Consent
of HJ Associates & Consultants LLP—Independent Registered Public
Accountants
|
(1)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Registration Statement on Form SB-1, file number
333-87535, filed on September 22, 1999.
|
(2)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2, File Number
333-71756, declared effective on July 26, 2002 and post-effective
amendment No. 1 thereto declared effective on August 25, 2003.
|
(3)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
March
31, 2005.
|
(4)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2, file number
333-123159 declared effective on March 18,
2005.
|
(5)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
March
31, 2006
|
(6)
|
Incorporated
by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-8, File Number
333-146318, filed on September 26,
2007.
|
Grafico Azioni Imagenetix (CE) (USOTC:IAGX)
Storico
Da Ott 2024 a Nov 2024
Grafico Azioni Imagenetix (CE) (USOTC:IAGX)
Storico
Da Nov 2023 a Nov 2024