UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

 

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the month of: August, 2024

 

Commission File No. 001-40381

 

NEW PACIFIC METALS CORP.
(Translation of registrant’s name into English)

 

Suite 1750 - 1066 W. Hastings Street

Vancouver BC, Canada V6E 3X1

(Address of principal executive office)

 

[Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F]

 

Form 20-F [   ]  Form 40-F  [X]




SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

Dated: August 14, 2024 NEW PACIFIC METALS CORP.  
     
  /s/ Jonathan Hoyles  
  Jonathan Hoyles  
  General Counsel & Corporate Secretary  



 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
99.1 Technical Report - Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study, with an effective date of June 19, 2024
99.2 Certificate of Leon Botham
99.3 Certificate of Andrew Holloway
99.4 Certificate of Mo Molavi
99.5 Certificate of Dinara Nussipakynova,
99.6 Certificate of Wayne Rogers
99.7 Certificate of Eugene Tucker

 


 


 Exhibit 99.1

 

AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd.  
BC0767129  
 
200 Granville Street, Suite 202
Vancouver BC V6C 1S4
Canada
 
T +1 604 669 0044  
E vancouver@amcconsultants.com  
W amcconsultants.com  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Technical Report

 

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study

New Pacific Metals Corp.

 

Potosí, Bolivia

 

In accordance with the requirements of National Instrument 43-101 “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects” (effective 09 June 2023) of the Canadian Securities Administrators

 

Qualified Persons:

E. Tucker, P.Eng.

D. Nussipakynova, P.Geo.

A. Holloway, P.Eng.

W. Rogers, P.Eng.

M. Molavi, P.Eng.

L. Botham, P.Eng.

 

 

AMC Project 0723071

Effective date 19 June 2024

 

 

EGBC Permit to Practice #: 1002350

 

 

Unearth a smarter way

 

 

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

1Summary

 

1.1Introduction

 

This 2024 Technical Report reports a Mineral Reserve estimate and provides the results of a Preliminary Feasibility Study (PFS) for the Silver Sand Property (the Property or Silver Sand), Potosí Department, Bolivia. The report has been prepared by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. (AMC Consultants) of Vancouver, Canada on behalf of New Pacific Metals Corp. (New Pacific or the Company) and has an effective date of 19 June 2024. The previous Technical Report on the Property titled “Silver Sand Deposit Preliminary Economic Assessment,” has an effective date of 30 November 2022.

 

New Pacific, through its wholly owned subsidiaries, acquired exploration and mining rights over an aggregate area of approximately 60 square kilometres (km2) covering the Silver Sand deposit and its surrounding areas. The Silver Sand area has been intermittently mined for silver from narrow high-grade mineralized veins in the Cretaceous sandstone since the early to mid-1500s.

 

The 2024 Technical Report has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101), “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects” (effective 09 June 2023) of the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) for lodgement on CSA’s “System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval” (SEDAR+).

 

1.2Property description and ownership

 

The Property is situated in the Colavi District of Potosí Department in southwestern Bolivia, 33 kilometres (km) north-east of Potosí city, the department capital. The approximate geographic centre of the Property is 19°22’ 4.97” S latitude and 65°31’ 22.93” W longitude at an elevation of 4,072 metres above sea level (masl).

 

The Property consists of multiple types of tenure under a consolidated Administrative Mining Contract (AMC) covering an area of 3.1656 km2 and is held through New Pacific’s 100% owned subsidiary Minera Alcira Sociedad Anónima Alcira S.A. (Alcira). The AMC is valid for 30 years and can be extended for an additional 30 years. In addition, New Pacific has acquired a 100% interest in three continuous mineral concessions called Jisas, Jardan and El Bronce originally owned by third party private entities. These three concessions were converted to two AMCs covering an area of 2.25 km2. The total area under full control of the Company is 5.42 km2.

 

In addition, through Alcira, New Pacific entered into a Mining Production Contract (MPC) with Corporación Minera de Bolivia (COMIBOL) on 11 January 2019 and an updated MPC was entered with COMIBOL on 19 January 2022 which covers 12 ATEs (Temporary Special Authorization) and 196 cuadriculas for an area of approximately 55 km2 that surround and overlap the Silver Sand core area. The Company continues to engage with COMIBOL, to obtain the ratification and approval of the signed MPC at the Silver Sand project by the Plurinational Legislative Assembly of Bolivia. The Company and COMIBOL have refined the MPC workplan to concentrate exclusively on claims immediately adjacent to the Silver Sand project boundary. This streamlined landholding, while maintaining the core value of the MPC to the Silver Sand project, is anticipated to facilitate progress towards ratification and approval of the MPC. For COMIBOL to obtain mining rights over such areas, AJAM (Jurisdictional Mining Administrative Authority) will have to grant them by way of AMCs or Exploration Licenses in accordance with Bolivian mining laws. In addition, the MPC must be ratified by the Congress of Bolivia (Congress) to be valid and enforceable.

 

Once the MPC has been ratified by Congress, the MPC with COMIBOL will be valid for 15 years which may be automatically renewed for an additional 15-year term and potentially, subject to submission of an acceptable work plan, for an additional 15-year term for a total of 45 years.

 

amcconsultants.comii

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

1.3Accessibility, climate, local resources, infrastructure and physiography

 

The Property is located approximately 36 km north-east of the Cerro Rico de Potosí silver and base metal mine, 46 km south-west of the city of Sucre, and 33 km north-east of the city of Potosí.

 

The Property is accessed from Sucre and Potosí by travelling along a paved highway to the community of Don Diego, and then north from Don Diego along a 27 km, maintained all-weather gravel road. Don Diego is accessed by driving 129 km to south-west from Sucre, or 29 km to the north-east from Potosí along paved Highway 5.

 

The Property is situated approximately within the central section of the Cordillera Oriental of Bolivia and consists of rolling hills with elevations ranging from 3,900 to 4,100 masl (metres above sea level). Due to the high elevation, the Property area has a cold, semi-arid desert climate despite the region’s location approximately 19 degrees south of the equator.

 

The region experiences a rainy season in the warmer summer months from December to mid-April which contributes approximately 80% of the average annual precipitation of 393 millimetres (mm). The driest period is from May to August with very little precipitation. Overall, the climate is mild and is amendable to year-round mining.

 

Vegetation on the Property is poorly developed and mainly consists of sparsely scattered low grasses and shrubs. In valleys below 4,000 m elevation, some eucalyptus trees are grown. Animals such as alpacas, llamas, vicunas, and guanacos are common in the Cordillera Oriental.

 

1.4Geological setting and mineralization

 

The Silver Sand Property is located in the south section of the polymetallic silver-tin belt in the Eastern Cordillera of the Central Andes, Bolivia. The oldest rocks observed within the Property comprise Ordovician to Silurian marine, clastic sediments which have been intensely folded and faulted.

 

Bedrock in the Property area mainly consists of weakly deformed Cretaceous continental sandstone, siltstone, and mudstone and the strongly deformed Paleozoic marine sedimentary rocks. The Cretaceous sedimentary sequence forms an open syncline which plunges gently NNW and is bounded to the SW and NE by NW trending faults.

 

The Cretaceous sedimentary sequence within the Property is divided into the lower La Puerta Formation and the upper Tarapaya Formation. The La Puerta Formation consists of sandstones and unconformably overlies the highly folded Paleozoic marine sedimentary rocks. The Tarapaya Formation conformably overlies the La Puerta sandstones in the central part of the Property and comprises siltstones and mudstones intercalated with minor sandstone.

 

Both the Cretaceous and Paleozoic sedimentary sequences are intruded by numerous small Miocene subvolcanic dacitic porphyry intrusions.

 

amcconsultants.comiii

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The Property exhibits a variety of geometries and morphology of the mineralized bodies which are controlled and hosted by local structures of tectonic transfer nature. Some are evident in outcrops, but the best examples are observed in drill cores and in underground workings. Mineralized structures usually appear as steps-overs developed between two neighbouring fault / vein segments that exhibit an echelon arrangement and may or may not be connected by lower-ranking faults / vein. These types of structures are of fractal type, which implies that they repeat their geometry, regardless of the observation scale, in arrangements of sigmoid (jogs), echelon, subparallel stepped, relay, horsetails, and extensional nets (swarms).

 

11 mineralized prospects have been identified across the Property to date. These include the Silver Sand deposit and the El Fuerte, San Antonio, Aullagas, Snake Hole, Mascota, Esperanza, North Plain, Jisas, Jardan, El Bronce, occurrences. Silver Sand, Snake Hole, Jisas, El Bronce, Aullagas, Mascota and Esperanza have been tested by drilling. Another nine prospects were defined by rock chip and grab sampling of ancient and recent artisanal mine workings and dumps and remain to be drill tested. Exploration results from surface outcrops and underground workings defined a silver mineralized belt 7.5 km long and 2 km wide.

 

At the Silver Sand deposit mineralization has been traced for more than 2,000 m along strike, to a maximum width of about 680 m and a dip extension of more than 250 m.

 

Four mineralization styles have been recognized in the Property, and these in order of importance are: (1) sandstone-hosted silver mineralization, (2) porphyritic dacitic-hosted silver mineralization, (3) diatream breccia-hosted silver mineralization, and (4) manto-type tin and base metal mineralization.

 

The mineralization in the Silver Sand project comprises silver-containing sulphosalts and sulphides occurring within sheeted veins, stockworks, veinlets, breccia infill and disseminated within host rocks. The most common silver-bearing minerals include freibergite [(Ag,Cu,Fe)12(Sb,As)4S13], miargyrite [AgSbS2], polybasite [(Ag,Cu)6(Sb,As)2S7] [Ag9CuS4], bournonite [PbCuSbS3] (some lattices of copper may be replaced by silver), andorite [PbAgSb3S6], and boulangerite [Pb5Sb4S11] (some lattices of lead may be replaced by silver). Most silver mineralization is hosted in La Puerta sandstone units with minor amounts in porphyritic dacite and diatreme breccia.

 

Silver mineralization is hosted by faults, fractures, fissures, and crackle breccia zones in the Cretaceous La Puerta (brittle) sandstone and porphyritic dacitic dikes, laccolith, and stocks. In the mineralized sandstone, open spaces are filled with silver-containing sulphosalts and sulphides in forms of sheeted veins, stockworks, and veinlets, as well as breccia fillings and minor disseminations. Most silver mineralization in the Property is structurally controlled with secondary rheological controls. The intensity of mineralization is dependent on the frequency of various mineralized vein structures developed in the brittle host rocks.

 

Silver and base metal mineralization in the Silver Sand Property was formed during the regional uplifting and erosion process associated with the Tertiary orogenic events in the Eastern Cordillera. The genetic model of silver and tin mineralization in the Property is a magmatic-hydrothermal system related to a deep-seated magmatic centre.

 

1.5Exploration

 

Since October 2017, New Pacific has carried out an extensive property-scale reconnaissance investigation program by surface and underground sampling of the mineralization outcrops and the accessible ancient underground mine workings across the Property.

 

amcconsultants.comiv

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

1,046 rock chip samples were collected from 35 separate outcrops by New Pacific. Continuous chip samples were collected at 1.5 m intervals along lines roughly perpendicular to the strike direction of the mineralization zones. Sample lines covered a total length of 2,863 m. Most of the sampled outcrops are located above or near old mine workings.

 

New Pacific has also mapped and sampled 65 historical mine workings comprising 5,780 m of underground tunnels. A total of 1,171 continuous chip samples has been collected at 1 - 2 m intervals along walls of available tunnels that cut across the mineralized zones.

 

Mine dumps from historical mining activities are scattered across a significant portion of the Property. New Pacific has collected a total of 1,408 grab samples from historical mine dumps. The majority of samples collected were remnants of high-grade narrow veins extracted from underground mining activity. Of the 1,408 samples collected from historical mine dumps to date, 439 samples (31%) returned assay results between 30 and 3,290 grams per tonne (g/t) Ag with an average grade of 194 g/t Ag.

 

Assay results of underground chip samples and surface mine dump grab samples show that silver mineralization widely occurs in the wall rocks of the previously mined-out high-grade veins in the abandoned ancient underground mining works.

 

1.6Drilling

 

From October 2017 to July 2022, New Pacific conducted intensive diamond drilling programs on the Property totalling 139,920 m in 564 drillholes. A total of 523 HQ diamond holes for a total metreage of 128,074 m was drilled over the Silver Sand core area to define the mineralization. After drilling specific exploration targets, holes were drilled on a 50 m x 50 m grid to delineate the spatial extensions of the major mineralized zones. This was followed up by drilling on a nominal 25 x 25 m grid, infilling defined areas of mineralization. Drilling was halted during 2020 and part 2021 due to COVID-19 protocols and recommenced later in 2021.

 

All holes were drilled from the surface. Drillholes were drilled up to 545 m deep at inclinations between -45° and -80° towards azimuths of 060° (~NE) and 220° (~SW) to intercept the principal trend of mineralized vein structures perpendicularly.

 

The drilling programs have covered an area of approximately 1,600 m long in the north-south direction and 800 m wide in the east-west direction and have defined silver mineralization at the Silver Sand deposit over an oblique strike length of 2 km, a collective width of 650 m and to a depth of 250 m below surface.

 

Drill coring was completed using conventional HQ (64 millimetre (mm) diameter) equipment and 3 m drill rods. Drill collars are surveyed using a Real-Time Kinematic differential global positioning system (GPS), and downhole deviation surveys are completed by the drilling contractor using a REFLEX EZ-SHOT and SPT GyroMaster downhole survey tools. Drillholes are surveyed at a depth of approximately 20 m, and on approximately 30 m intervals as drilling progresses. Upon completion of each drillhole a concrete monument is constructed with the hole details inscribed.

 

Core is collected by New Pacific personnel and drill core containing visible mineralization is wrapped in paper to minimize disturbance during transport. Logging is both carried out at the rig where a quick log is completed, and after transportation to the company’s Betanzos core processing facility, which is located approximately 1.5 hours drive from the Property. Currently data is directly collected or loaded into MX Deposit a database software from Sequent.

 

In addition to drilling in the Silver Sand core area, drilling was carried out at Snake Hole (32 drillholes for 7,457 m) and at the northern prospects, (nine drillholes for 4,298 m). These holes

 

amcconsultants.comv

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

were more exploratory in nature but the same procedures as the grid drilling in the core area were employed.

 

Core recovery from the drill programs varies between 0% (voids and overburden) and 100%, averaging 97%. More than 92% of core intervals have a core recovery of greater than 95%.

 

1.7Sample preparation, assay, and QA/QC

 

New Pacific has developed and implemented good standard procedures for sample preparation, analytical, and security protocols.

 

New Pacific manages all aspects of sampling from the collection of samples, to sample delivery to the laboratory. All samples are stored and processed at the Betanzos facility. This facility is surrounded by a brick wall, has a locked gate, and is monitored by video surveillance and security guard 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Within the facility, there are separate and locked areas for core logging, sampling, and storage.

 

Samples are transported on a weekly basis by New Pacific personnel from the Betanzos facility to the ALS laboratories (ALS) in Oruro, Bolivia for sample preparation, and then shipped to ALS in Lima, Peru for geochemical analysis. ALS Oruro and ALS Lima are part of ALS Global – an independent commercial laboratory specializing in analytical geochemistry services, all of which are accredited in accordance with ISO/IES 17025:2017, and are independent of New Pacific.

 

All core, chip, and grab samples are prepared using the following procedures: (1) crush to 70% less than 2 mm; (2) riffle split off 250 g; and (3) pulverize split to better than 85% passing a 75-micron sieve.

 

Sample analysis in 2017 and 2018 comprised an aqua regia digest followed by Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (AES) analysis of Ag, Pb, and Zn (ALS code OG46). Assay results greater than 1,500 g/t Ag were sent for fire assay and gravimetric finish analysis. In 2019 New Pacific changed its analysis protocol to include systematic multielement analysis for an initial 51 element ICP mass spectroscopy (MS) analysis. Over-limit samples were handled differently for different elements and protocols were further amended for the 2021-2022 drilling.

 

Drill programs have included Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) monitoring programs which have incorporated the insertion of certified reference materials (CRMs), blanks, and duplicates into the sample streams, and umpire (check) assays at a separate laboratory at different times.

 

Four different CRMs have been used throughout the project history. A total of 4,495 CRMs was submitted between October 2017 and July 2022 representing an average overall insertion rate of 5%. Insertion rates for CRMs have been consistently above 5% on a yearly basis with the exception of 2019.

 

Blank material from two different quarry sites has been used over time and coarse blanks have been inserted consistently at an acceptable insertion rate. While there have been some changes in failure criteria, there has been no evidence of systemic contamination and failures are dealt with by a re-assay protocol. Pulp blank samples have been inserted since 2021, but at a low insertion rate of less than 2.5%. Duplicates are also inserted, comprising field duplicates, coarse duplicates and pulp duplicates. In 2021 and 2022 they have been consistently included but at a rate of between 3.65% and 4.07%. Coarse rejects were also submitted to Actlabs Skyline as umpire samples in the 2017 to 2019 period. Actlabs Skyline is an independent geochemical laboratory certified according to ISO 9001:2015.

 

amcconsultants.comvi

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The Qualified Person (QP) has reviewed the QA/QC procedures used by New Pacific including certified reference materials, blank, duplicate and umpire data and has made some recommendations. The QP does not consider these to have a material impact on the Mineral Resource estimate and considers the assay database to be adequate for Mineral Resource estimation. The QP considers sample preparation, security, and analytical procedures employed by New Pacific to be adequate.

 

1.8Mineral Resources

 

The Mineral Resource estimate was completed using 556 drillholes on the Property comprising 136,220 m of diamond core and 92,164 assays. Grade interpolation was completed for silver, lead, zinc, copper, arsenic, and sulphur. Only silver is reported as it is the only economic metal. All estimation utilized ordinary kriging (OK) except for 127 small domains which were estimated using the inverse distance squared (ID2) method.

 

The mineralization domains were built by New Pacific using Leapfrog Geo 4.0 software. The mineralization domains were reviewed and accepted by the QP with some changes, including separating the main domain into two areas based on vein orientation.

 

The QP estimated into these domains and also estimated a background block model that was combined with the domain mineralization to form the final block model.

 

New Pacific performed 6,297 bulk density measurements on the core drilled on the Property. As the mineralization is hosted in one rock type, after reviewing the density data, the QP assigned a single bulk density measurement to the block model of 2.54 t/m3.

 

The pit-constrained Mineral Resources are reported for blocks above a conceptual pit shell based on a US$22.50/ounce silver price. There is not a reporting restriction to within the AMC claim boundary as in the 2020 Technical Report as an agreement has been reached with COMIBOL in regard to the surrounding MPC.

 

The cut-off applied for reporting the pit-constrained Mineral Resources is 30 g/t silver. Assumptions made to derive a cut-off grade (COG) included mining costs, processing costs and recoveries and were obtained from comparable industry situations. The model is depleted for historical mining activities. The assumptions are shown in Table 1.1.

 

Table 1.1 Assumptions for pit optimization

 

Input Units Value
Silver price $/oz Ag 22.5
Silver process recovery % 91
Payable silver % 99
Mining recovery factor % 100
Mining cost $/t mined 2.6
Process cost $/t minable material > COG 16
G&A cost $/t minable material > COG 2
Slope angle degrees 44 - 47

Notes:

·Sustaining capital cost has not been included.
·Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources included.

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.comvii

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The Mineral Resource for the Silver Sand deposit has been estimated by Ms Dinara Nussipakynova, P.Geo. Principal Geologist of BBA, formerly employed with AMC Consultants, who takes responsibility for the estimate.

 

Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

 

Table 1.2 Mineral Resource as of 31 October 2022

 

Resource category Tonnes (Mt) Ag (g/t) Ag (Moz)
Measured 14.88 131 62.60
Indicated 39.38 110 139.17
Measured & Indicated 54.26 116 201.77
Inferred 4.56 88 12.95

Notes:

CIM Definition Standards (2014) were used for reporting the Mineral Resources.

·The QP is Dinara Nussipakynova, P.Geo. of BBA, formerly employed with AMC Consultants.
·Mineral Resources are constrained by optimized pit shells at a metal price of US$22.50/oz Ag, recovery of 91% Ag, and COG of 30 g/t Ag.
·Drilling results up to 25 July 2022.
·The numbers may not compute exactly due to rounding.
·Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

1.9Mineral Reserves

 

Open pit life-of-mine (LOM) plans and resulting open pit Mineral Reserves are determined based on a silver price of US$23.00/oz. Reserves stated in this report are dated effective as of 19 June 2024. The mine design and Mineral Reserve estimate have been completed to a level appropriate for pre- feasibility studies.

 

Ore is converted from Mineral Resource to Mineral Reserve based primarily on positive cash flow pit optimization results, pit design, and geological classification of Measured and Indicated resources. The in-situ value is derived from the estimated grade and certain modifying factors.

 

In the process of estimating the Mineral Reserves, dilution and mining recovery factors were applied to the Mineral Resource using a block model regularization process. AMC Consultants regularized the resource model to a uniform size of 5 m x 5 m x 5 m to better reflect the minimum parcel size that can selectively be mined.

 

The Silver Sand project will be mined using a conventional open pit mining method, utilizing 115 t hydraulic backhoe excavators and haulage by off-highway 72 t capacity rear dump haul trucks. Mining is anticipated to be completed by a contract mining company. The majority of the excavated material will require drilling and blasting. Drilling and blasting will be performed on 10 m benches. Flitch height is variable depending on the material being mined. Overburden and waste will be mined in 5 m flitches and ore is to be mined in 3.3 m flitches. Ore will be hauled to a crusher or to run-of-mine (ROM) stockpiles. Waste will be hauled to external and in-pit waste rock dumps.

 

The pseudoflow pit optimization algorithm, as implemented in GEOVIA Whittle software, was used to determine the ultimate pit shell for Silver Sand. The selected pit shells were then used to produce pit designs and the mining schedule.

 

The open pit Mineral Reserves are reported within a pit design based on open pit optimization results. The Mineral Reserves represent the economically mineable part of Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources and are presented in Table 1.3.

 

amcconsultants.comviii

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 1.3 Mineral Reserve estimate as of 19 June 2024

 

  Tonnes (Mt) Ag (g/t) Ag (Moz)
Proven 15.09 121 58.84
Probable 36.92 98 116.58
Proven & Probable 52.01 105 175.42

Notes:

·CIM Definition Standards (2014) were used for reporting the Mineral Reserves.
·The Qualified Person is Wayne Rogers, P.Eng. of AMC Consultants.
·Cut-off grade of 27 g/t Ag for material inside the AMC, and 29 g/t Ag outside the AMC limit based on operating costs of 16.71 US$/t of ore, 91% Ag metallurgical recovery, 0.50 US$/oz Ag treatment and selling costs, 6% royalty within AMC, 12% royalty outside AMC, and 99.00% payable silver.
·Ag price assumed is US$23.00 per troy ounce.
·Base mine unit cost of 2.00 $/t mined plus an incremental mining cost of 0.04 $/t mined per 10 m bench.
·Ore mining costs including a process unit cost of 14.20 $/t milled, TSF 0.65 $/t milled, and G&A 1.86 $/t milled.
·Mineral Reserves include dilution and mining recovery.
·Reserves are converted from Resources through the process of pit optimization, pit design, production schedule, and supported by a positive cash flow model.
·The totals may not sum due to rounding.
·Probable Mineral Reserves are based on Indicated Mineral Resources only.
·Proven Mineral Reserves are based on Measured Mineral Resources only.
·Ag metal (Moz) represents contained metal.

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

1.10Mining methods

 

The Silver Sand open pit is comprised of one main pit that is split into eight sub-phases (MP1-8). It will be mined using a conventional open pit approach of drilling and blasting ore and waste rock, with material mined by hydraulic excavators loading into off-highway rear dump haul trucks.

 

The open pit will be dewatered using horizontally drilled drain holes and pumping from sumps. Where possible, diversion ditches will be built upslope of the pit to divert non-contact water. The dewatering plan is staged to incorporate additional dewatering measures as the mine plan expands over the life-of-mine (LOM). Additional work is recommended as part of future studies to improve the understanding of the shallow groundwater system, dewatering conditions required for major and local fault structures, and the overall hydrogeological system.

 

For the PFS study, the geological model, structural models, hydrogeological model, and rock mass characterization have been developed with variable levels of confidence. The 3D geotechnical model has allowed the geotechnical slope design parameters to be developed. The pit design criteria are appropriate and comply with industry norms. Methodologies used for the slope design are sound and to international standards. The extent of the weathered horizon and slope stability under seismic conditions have not been considered in the geotechnical slope design and should be explored in future studies.

 

The pit was designed with 20 m high benches (10 m double benches). Pit ramps were designed with a maximum gradient of 10%, at 21 m wide for double-lane traffic and 12 m wide for single-lane traffic. The bottom three benches of the pit were designed with single-lane access, with one final sub-excavation bench (also known as a “goodbye cut”) in the final pit floor. The pit is approximately 2,300 m in length, 350 m to 700 m in width, and 280 m at its deepest point.

 

The open pit contains approximately 52.0 Mt of ore with a grade of 105 g/t Ag and 181.9 Mt of waste material, with an overall waste to mineralized material strip ratio of 3.50 to 1.

 

amcconsultants.comix

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The open pit operation includes a two-year pre-production period (Years -2 & -1) and 13 years of production.

 

During the pre-production period, the schedule is driven predominately by waste stripping to achieve tailings storage facility (TSF) embankment construction requirements. Other activities during the pre-production period include haul road construction, mine development, and some ore stockpiling.

 

ROM stockpiles will be constructed near the plant for low-grade, medium-grade, and high-grade ore. The ore stockpiles will be used to allow for blending of the different grades of ore to provide a constant feed grade to the plant for sustained periods which will assist in maximizing metallurgical recovery. A maximum long-term stockpile capacity of 4.40 Mt is required.

 

Six dumping areas for waste material are planned; these include two in-pit dumps and four external dumps. Upstream of the open pit, a water dam will be constructed in the Machacamarca Creek valley using waste rock from initial waste stripping. The Valley dump, located north of the water dam, will also be constructed to establish access to the mining phases north of the creek. Waste material will also be used to construct the embankment for the TSF. Later in the mine life, waste will be dumped into depleted pits to take advantage of shorter haul distances.

 

An ex-pit production rate of 18.0 Mtpa is adequate to achieve the plant feed target of 4.0 Mtpa. MP1, MP5, and MP7 are mined first in Year -2 and waste material from these phases is used to construct the water dam and TSF embankment. Two years of pre-production mining are required to achieve the TSF embankment and water dam construction requirements. Once the water dam is constructed, higher-value phases MP2, MP3, and MP4 are mined as the mining schedule targets high-grade and low strip-ratio ore. Mining in MP7 is expedited to take advantage of short-hauling waste from MP8, towards the end of mining.

 

1.11Processing and metallurgy

 

The results of PFS metallurgical testwork (described in Section 13) have been used together with previous (PEA) testwork to progressively de-risk a straightforward mineral processing flowsheet for the Silver Sand project. Interpretation of this testwork has been used as the basis for PFS level process design criteria (PDC), mass / water / metal balances, process flowsheet and equipment specification. The PFS process plant flowsheet is described in detail in Section 17.

 

The 2022 PEA conclusions regarding the process flowsheet and equipment type have been validated by the work completed as part of the PFS. In addition, more comprehensive sample collection and characterization of these samples have enhanced the metallurgical body of knowledge for the project and allowed further optimization of input parameters such as grinding size, leaching time, cyanide dosage, and oxygen levels.

 

Agitated tank cyanidation, followed by counter current decantation (CCD) and zinc precipitation is still considered the optimum processing route when factors such as updated metallurgical performance, capital costs, and mine production schedules are considered. Various parameters affecting the performance of this flowsheet have been adjusted and updated, and the PFS base case represents a further de-risking of the processing aspects of the project.

 

The selected flowsheet represents a very conventional, proven approach to silver extraction that is similar to other operations in Bolivia. The flowsheet consists of the following unit operations:

 

·ROM receiving, single stage (primary) crushing, and crushed rock storage.
·Stockpile discharge, grinding via SAG milling and ball milling.

 

amcconsultants.comx

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

·SAG mill pebble crushing via SAG mill pebble ports, scalping screen, recycle conveyors, and cone crusher.
·Pre-leach thickening of the classified mill circuit product, and cyanide leaching of the thickener underflow using agitated, oxygen sparged tanks.
·Liquid / solid separation using a four-stage CCD circuit.
·Recovery of silver from pregnant leach solution using a zinc precipitation process followed by drying and smelting with fluxes to produce silver doré bars.
·Thickening and filtration of leach residues.
·Conveying of filter cake and long-term storage at the tailings storage area.

 

As copper will be recovered into solution along with silver, and some dissolved copper is expected to be cemented together with silver, a small copper removal leach circuit will be required within the refinery to maintain good doré quality and/or reduce circulating copper concentrations.

 

The PFS flowsheet is projected to recover an average of 90% silver into a doré product for export to established international markets.

 

1.12Infrastructure

 

As a greenfield project, the Silver Sand project will require the development of supporting infrastructure. The Property is accessible from Potosí via a 54 km long road made up of a 27 km stretch of the paved Bolivia National Highway 5 and an all-season gravel road built for mining in the Colavi District. The gravel road is currently being widened and upgraded to a paved road by the government.

 

The Silver Sand project is estimated to require a power supply of approximately 25 megawatts (MW) of electricity, which will be provided by Bolivia’s national power supply company, ENDE Transmission S.A (ENDE). A preliminary power supply plan between ENDE and New Pacific has been agreed upon and the Company has submitted a power supply application to the Bolivia Ministry of Energy.

 

The new 55 km 115 kV transmission line will connect the existing ENDE Potosí substation and a new substation that will be constructed at the Silver Sand site. ENDE has provided a quotation to the Company for the construction of the power line and the substation. Additionally, ENDE will be responsible for permitting and constructing the transmission line and the substation, which is estimated to take up to two years.

 

A rockfill water dam with an upstream geomembrane liner will be built upstream from the mine. The reservoir developed behind the dam will have a maximum capacity of approximately 3.0 million cubic metres and will provide water for the project.

 

The filtered tailings storage facility will be integrated within the waste rock storage area and located to the south of the mine and process plant. The TSF will be fully lined to protect the local surface and groundwater systems. A leachate collection system will be installed below the liner system to collect any seepage and direct it to the run-off collection ponds.

 

An initial berm of mine waste rock will be constructed on the south and east sides of the TSF to provide structural support for the tailings and liner system.

 

A starter TSF cell will be developed along the western perimeter of the waste rock storage facility, with sufficient capacity to store tailings from the first year of operations. The perimeter of the TSF will be raised as waste rock becomes available from mining operations and the liner system is extended over the operating life of the mine.

 

amcconsultants.comxi

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

It is expected that most project employees will commute from Potosí or other nearby communities. However, a camp with capacity for 100 people has been projected for workers not residing in the local area.

 

Other infrastructure such as offices, mobile equipment maintenance shop, fuel storage, warehouse, and laboratory are envisaged to be built close to the processing plant.

 

Figure 1.1 shows the proposed site layout with open pits, waste dumps, process plant, filtered TSF, ore stockpile area, crusher, site access road, and haul roads.

 

Figure 1.1 Preliminary site infrastructure layout

 

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.  

 

amcconsultants.comxii

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

1.13Environmental studies, permitting and social or community impact

 

To obtain the environmental license for the Arena de Plata (Silver Sand) mining project in the department of Potosí, New Pacific is preparing studies and activities that will allow it to provide a comprehensive Analytical Environmental Impact Assessment Study (EEIA-AI) in accordance with the current environmental legislation in force in the Plurinational State of Bolivia.

 

Following the completion of the EEIA-AI, New Pacific will commence the mandatory public consultation process, which occurs late in the Bolivian mine permitting process. A notarized act is formed as part of the consultation process. It is a legal document that will contain the points and aspects of conformity and observations of the community on the mining operation in public ponsultation and the socio-environmental impact that it could generate.

 

The mining law in Bolivia establishes that a mining operator must establish an accounting provision to cover the cost of closing operations, however, it does not establish other environmental guarantees as is the case in other countries in the Andean region.

 

1.14Capital and operating costs

 

All currency is in US dollars (US$) and cost estimates are based on prices obtained during the second quarter of 2024. Costs for the project have been estimated based on a hybrid owner- contractor project delivery model.

 

The responsibility of providing various capital and operating cost inputs for the project financial model are as follows:

 

·Mining – Costs related to the development and operation of the open pit mine, surface haul roads, and stockpiles were developed by AMC Consultants. QP Mr W Rogers has relied on HydroTechnica Ltd. to develop mine dewatering cost but accepts them as reasonable and takes responsibility for them.
·Processing – Costs related to the construction and operation of mineral processing infrastructure were developed by Halyard Inc. QP Mr A. Holloway takes responsibility for those costs.
·Tailings storage & the water dam – Costs related to the transportation and storage of tailings and the water dam were developed by NewFields Canada Mining & Environment ULC. QP Mr L. Botham takes responsibility for those costs.
·Site infrastructure – Costs related to the deployment of site infrastructure and earthworks to support the on-site camp, mobile maintenance workshop, explosives storage, fuel storage infrastructure, transmission infrastructure, communications, and network infrastructure were developed by AMC Consultants. QP Mr M. Molavi takes responsibility for those costs.
·General & Admin – Costs related to permitting, community compensation and projects, logistics, administration, and labour were developed by New Pacific. QP Mr W Rogers takes responsibility for those costs.

 

The operating cost estimate allows for all labour, equipment, supplies, power, consumables, supervision, technical services, as well as general and administrative (G&A) costs. The total operating cost was estimated at 1,281 US$ million, excluding capitalized operating costs. The estimared average operating cost over the LOM can be expressed as 8.16 US$/troy oz. of silver produced and as 24.63 US$/tonne milled. An overview of average LOM costs by activity is presented in Table 1.4.

 

amcconsultants.comxiii

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 1.4 Average LOM unit operating cost summary

 

Operating cost category Total costs Cost per payable oz produced Cost per tonne
US$M US$/troy oz US$/tonne milled
Mining 482 3.07 9.28
Processing & tailings 713 4.54 13.71
G&A 86 0.54 1.65
Total operating cost 1,281 8.16 24.63

Note: Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding.
Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

Initial project development capital costs for the Silver Sand project are estimated to be $358.3 M and sustaining capital costs are estimated to be $84.7 M, for a total of $443.0 M. See Table 1.5 for capital costs by category.

 

Table 1.5 Capital cost summary

 

Capital cost item (US$M) Total cost Initial capital costs Sustaining capital costs
Infrastructure 50.7 47.0 3.7
Mine development 76.6 76.1 0.5
Processing plant 209.4 207.3 2.0
Tailings Storage Facility 70.3 6.7 63.6
Owner’s capital costs 21.2 21.2  
Closure costs 14.9   14.9
Total 443.0 358.3 84.7

Note: Includes direct, indirect, and contingency costs. Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding.

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

1.15Economic analysis

 

All currency is in US$ unless otherwise stated. The cost estimate was prepared with a base date of the second half of Year -2 (starting 1 July) and does not include any escalation beyond this date. For net present value (NPV) estimation, all costs and revenues are discounted at 5% per year from the base date. The economic model shows the Project under construction for two years (Year -2 and Year -1), which is considered the pre-production development period, and then in production for the balance of the projected cash flows, which is considered the operating period (Years 1 to 14).

 

Project revenue is derived from the sale of silver doré. A metal price of $24.00/troy oz. was selected after discussion with New Pacific and referencing current markets and forecasts in the public domain. Refer to Section 19 for additional information on the silver price.

 

Within the AMC area, a royalty of 6.0% of gross revenue is paid to the government. Most of the Mineral Reserves lie within the AMC area. Outside of the AMC area, an additional 6.0% royalty is to be paid to COMIBOL. No other royalties or levies apply to the Project. The selling costs and payability rate, for which the QP takes responsibiltyn are based on information provided by New Pacific and Halyard. The selling costs for silver doré are summarized in Table 1.6.

 

amcconsultants.comxiv

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 1.6 Selling costs and royalties

  

Selling cost item Value Units
Payable silver 99.50% of Ag produced
Transportation & insurance costs 0.25 US$/oz
Refining charges 0.20 US$/oz
Royalty to COMIBOL (outside the AMC limit) 6.00% of gross revenue
Royalty to the Bolivian Government 6.00% of gross revenue

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp. and Halyard Inc., 2024.

 

A regular Bolivian corporate income tax rate of 25% was applied. As a mining property, the Project is subject to an additional tax of 12.5%, with a 5% reduction for companies that produce pure metal products (as is the case with the Silver Sand project producing silver doré onsite). Corporate income tax was calculated on taxable income, which also considers operating costs and depreciation.

 

A high-level economic assessment of the proposed open pit operation of the Silver Sand deposit was conducted. The project is projected to generate a post-tax NPV of $740M at a discount rate of 5% per year, with post-tax IRR of 37%.

 

Initial project capital is estimated at $358M with a payback period of 1.9 years (measured on a post-tax basis from the beginning of production, after construction is completed). Key assumptions and results of the economics assessments are provided in Table 1.7.

 

A sensitivity analysis is provided in Section 22. The results of the sensitivity analysis show that the post-tax NPV is robust and remains positive for the range of sensitivities evaluated.

 

amcconsultants.comxv

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 1.7 Silver Sand deposit – Key economic input assumptions and cost summary

 

Item Unit Value
Total process feed material kt 52,014
Total waste mined kt 181,878
Pre-production waste mined kt 24,261
Production waste mined kt 157,617
Silver feed grade g/t 105
Silver processing recovery rate % 90%
Silver selling price $/oz 24.00
Discount rate % 5%
Silver payability rate % 99.50%
Payable silver metal Moz 157
Gross revenue $M 3,770
Product selling costs & royalties $M 313
Total net revenue $M 3,457
Total capital costs $M 443
Initial capital costs $M 358
Sustaining capital costs $M 85
Total operating costs1 $M 1,281
Mine operating costs1 $M 482
Process and tailings storage operating costs1 $M 713
General and administrative operating costs1 $M 86
Operating cash cost1 (excl. selling costs) $/oz Ag 8.16
Pre-tax all in sustaining cost2 $/oz Ag 10.69
Post-tax payback period3 Yrs 1.9
Post-tax NPV5% $M 740
Post-tax IRR % 37%

Notes: Values may not sum due to rounding.

1.Does not include capitalized operating costs
2.Does not include site development (initial) capital costs.
3.The payback period is measured from the beginning of production, after construction is completed.

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

1.16Interpretation and conclusions

 

The deposit, as currently defined, remains open for expansion. Additionally, there has been no modern, district-scale exploration. While it is understood that engineering work for the feasibility study will be based on the current block model, there are some recommendations for future exploration. Some grade control drilling may also be required pre-production but has not been quantified at this stage.

 

The proposed mine plan has a two-year pre-production period, followed by 13 years of production, at a processing plant throughput rate of 4 Mtpa of ore. The mine plan includes a stockpiling strategy with low-grade, mid-grade, and high-grade ore stockpiles that will be used to maximize silver production in the early years of the project. The total annual ex-pit material mined peaks at 18.0 Mtpa, before dropping to 8.0 Mtpa at the end of the open pit mine life. The open pit is planned to be a contractor-run operation with a contractor-provided mining fleet. A total of 52.0 Mt of ore is anticipated to be mined from open pit operations over the LOM.

 

amcconsultants.comxvi

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The selected PFS flowsheet consists of comminution by crushing, followed by semi-autogenous and ball milling, agitated tank leaching with cyanidation over 72 hours, CCD, and zinc precipitation (Merrill Crowe). The silver precipitate from Merrill Crowe will be treated for copper removal, and then smelted to produce silver doré.

 

Thickened tailings from the CCD circuit will be filtered with pressure filters before being conveyed to the nearby TSF, deposited using a radial stacker and then spread using tracked dozers. The tailings will be stored behind a fully lined rock-fill embankment. The embankment will be constructed using waste rock provided from the open pit. Seepage and run-off from the TSF will be collected in a pond which will be located downstream of the facility. Upon mine closure, it is anticipated that the TSF will be capped with rock and reclaimed topsoil to provide a secure facility.

 

Process water is expected to be sourced from the water reservoir adjacent to the process plant and from recycled water from the TSF, supplemented by site runoff as required. A site-wide water balance model has been developed to maximize water recycling over the LOM.

 

There is currently no infrastructure on site apart from access roads. New Pacific has undertaken discussions with the power authorities in Bolivia to arrange for access to grid power. A water supply can be secured with the construction of a small dam across the Machacamarca Creek to create a reservoir to supply the process plant and local community.

 

There is a 54 km long road made up of a 27 km stretch of the paved Bolivia National Highway 5 and an all-season gravel road built for mining in the Colavi District. The gravel road is currently being widened and upgraded to paved road by the government.

 

1.17Recommendations

 

The main recommendation is to advance the Silver Sand project to a feasibility study (FS) level. This will require advancing the definition and engineering level of all of the mining, processing, and infrastructural aspects. While the current block model will form the basis for that study work there is further geology and exploration work that is recommended.

 

1.17.1Geology

 

There are a number of recommendations on all facets of QA/QC summarized below. These are expanded on in Section 11.

 

·Purchase an additional CRM (Certified Reference Material) at the average grade of the deposit which has been certified using similar digestion methodology.
·Investigate performance issues with CRMs CDN-ME-1603 and CDN-ME-1605 if these are to be used in future programs.
·If continue to use ME-MS41 analytical method it is recommended that the OG46 over-limit threshold be dropped from 100 g/t Ag to a level below the anticipated COG.
·Continue to include blanks in every batch of samples submitted at a rate of at least one in every 20 samples (5%) and consistently monitor them in real time on a batch-by-batch basis and ensure that remedial action is taken as issues arise.
·Ensure that all blank sample follow up is recorded.
·Implement investigative work to understand geological variance.
·Ensure that all future programs include 4 - 5% duplicate samples including field duplicates, coarse (crush) duplicates, and pulp duplicates to enable the various stages of sub-sampling to be monitored.
·In future programs, submit umpire duplicates, as was done for the October 2017 – 2019 programs.

 

amcconsultants.comxvii

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

·Submit pulp samples (rather than coarse reject) so that umpire samples only monitor analytical accuracy and variance.
·Include CRMs at the average grade and higher grades in umpire sample submissions.

 

For future Mineral Resource modelling, the following should be considered:

 

·Incorporate geometallurgical attributes into the block model.
·Verify mined-out volumes by surveying historical waste dumps. Conduct structural analysis of available data and complete initial structural / geotechnical drilling as required.
·Update the 3D geological model to include detailed geology – deposit oxidation domaining and structures.

 

The Silver Sand deposit, as currently defined, remains open for expansion at depth. While it is understood that engineering work for the PFS will be based on the current block model, it is recommended that future drilling on the deposit should consider the following:

 

·Infill drilling to upgrade areas of high-grade mineralization within the current Inferred resource area.
·Additional drilling around the current Mineral Resources, where the deposit remains open at depth.

 

The QP also notes that there has been no modern district-scale exploration outside of Silver Sand deposit.

 

1.17.2Metallurgy & mineral processing

 

The PFS metallurgical program included cyanide leach testing of 18 mineralized samples and demonstrated that cyanide leaching is a technically viable option to recover silver for the project. The work has incrementally de-risked metallurgical aspects of the project, although opportunities for improvement are believed to remain. Further metallurgical investigations are warranted to study opportunities to increase silver recovery and to reduce cyanide consumption. A summary of metallurgical and mineral processing recommendations is as follows. See Section 26.4 for detailed recommendations.

 

·Sample selection and characterization – The completion of more extensive metallurgical sampling, characterization testing, and performance modelling is recommended as infill drilling programs continue.
·Gravity concentration – Further testing is recommended to refine the gravity concentration process and optimize silver recovery.
·Cyanidation – Further cyanidation test work should continue to focus on leach conditions that include high dissolved oxygen (DO2) levels. The DO2 vs silver recovery relationship should be defined further to allow for the optimized design of oxygenation equipment in the flowsheet.
·Process water effects – Due to copper dissolution in process water during the cyanide leach, more detailed metallurgical testing is needed to study the impact of recycled process solutions.
·Pre-leach thickening – Comparative thickening testing is needed for the cyanide-leached tailing without prior cyanide destruction.
·Optimization of Merril Crowe – Testing should be conducted to reduce silver with zinc dust, without the addition of lead nitrate.
·Cyanidation methods – Cyanide leaching with a mechanically-agitated tank should be tested as the use of LifterbottleTM rolls has been demonstrated to improve silver recovery and cyanide consumption.

 

amcconsultants.comxviii

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

·Oxygen intake during cyanide leach – Additional testing for oxygen intake during the cyanide leach should be conducted so that final design parameters for an oxygen sparging system can be defined.
·Copper removal from Merril Crowe precipitates – Testing is needed to selectively dissolve copper in the presence of metallic silver while hydrogen peroxide and sulfuric acid are used.
·Preg-robbing, preg-borrowing, and instability of silver cyanide complex – A detailed investigation into the preg-robbing or preg-borrowing phenomenon, possible instability of the silver cyanide complex, possible equipment contamination, and possible unreliable assay procedures is warranted.

 

1.17.3Open pit mining

 

It is recommended that the following aspects are examined in the next study stage:

 

·Review of drillhole records and geological data for improved conceptual understanding of the shallow groundwater system.
·Sampling of the springs and wetland to the north and west of the Main Pit.
·Shallow drilling (auger or diamond drilling) to install shallow piezometers and prove the depth of the colluvial system, and whether it supports a water table upstream of the springs and within the wetland area.
·Permeability testing of the existing standpipe piezometers.
·Construction of a trial dewatering borehole in the alluvial deposits of the main river channel to investigate its hydrogeological properties and allow for a targeted dewatering strategy, if required.
·Construction of at least one trial dewatering borehole into a major fault structure and surrounding piezometer array to investigate fault properties and surrounding fracture connectivity.
·The installation of multi-level vibrating wire piezometers is recommended to improve the understanding of the hydrogeological system. The following targets are recommended:
¾At least one major and one local fault structure.
¾The shallow aquifer system in hill-slope colluvium (further to positive results from exploratory drilling).
¾The Tarapaya Formation (where saturated).
¾UH3 orthogonal to the existing standpipe piezometers for triangulation of groundwater pressure.
¾UH3 north and south of the river.
·It is recommended to develop a weathering horizon model and collect additional geotechnical data as per Section 16.3.4 to increase the geotechnical model reliability. Geotechnical slope design criteria should be updated when further information is available and pit slope stability should be assessed under static and seismic conditions.
·The ongoing geotechnical program should be continued to collect additional data for pit wall angle stability analysis.
·Soil and weathered core samples should be collected for lab testing.
·It is recommended to undertake a detailed bench height and dilution study. The study should consider lateral block extents, flitch / bench heights, equipment specifications, drill and blast, mining rates, dilution and grade control strategies, and geotechnical implications.

 

Grade control strategies, such as grade control drilling and blast movement monitoring should also be further evaluated.

 

amcconsultants.comxix

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

·It is recommended that quotes from multiple Bolivian mining contractors are collected to firm up the mining costs estimates for the open pit operations. New Pacific is recommended to acquire binding (or “firm”) quotes for the primary mining contractor to achieve a higher level of accuracy for the FS.
·Further work should be conducted to identify alternative dump locations, i.e., in the creek gully, to reduce haul distance.
·The amount of time required for site development and construction will significantly influence the value of the project. As part of the FS, New Pacific is recommended to prepare an operational readiness assessment and create a detailed development schedule to ensure the project is fully prepared for operation.

 

1.17.4Infrastructure

 

·Location and placement of accommodation camp, waste dump, crusher, and process plant to be confirmed following civil geotechnical and condemnation drilling.
·Continue to negotiate with power authorities to confirm the cost estimate, and that sufficient grid capacity can be provided.
·The site requires significant earthworks to construct the supporting infrastructure. New Pacific to investigate the potential for engaging contractors who are familiar with this type of work to obtain an accurate and dependable estimate of costs.

 

1.17.5Tailings storage

 

·The early years of the mine production schedule are driven by silver grades and the requirement to produce waste material to be used as rock fill for the tailings storage embankment. As part of the FS, it is recommended to investigate alternative configurations for tailings storage, to reduce the volume (and cost) of waste production in the early years of the project.
·Initiate a geotechnical, geological, and hydrogeological investigations to fully characterize the site conditions in the location of the proposed waste storage facility.
·Initiate detailed geochemical characterization program, including static and kinetic testing to fully characterize the tailings and waste rock materials to be produced from the mining and processing operations.
·Potential for formation of Acid Rock Drainage is not well understood. It is recommended to undertake testing to evaluate the time to acidification and the extent of Acid Rock Drainage of the waste rock.

 

1.17.6Environmental

 

·Complete the environmental baseline study, impact analysis, and mitigation plans. Permitting is required to be advanced.
·New Pacific is recommended to conduct a detailed closure and reclamation plan as part of the FS.
·Environmental programs have commenced with a reasonable set of samples characterized. As the project continues to progress towards permitting and construction, a larger set of variability samples should be submitted to develop the dataset of geochemical behaviour (acid-generation and metals leaching) in plant tailing streams and waste rock piles. FS level environmental test work should include static tests and kinetic (humidity cell) tests on filtered slurry samples generated by the most recent test work. These tests would not include cyanide detoxification as this process is no longer included in the process flowsheet.

 

amcconsultants.comxx

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

1.17.7Financial inputs

 

It is recommended that New Pacific retain a tax specialist for the FS to investigate the possibility of including tax credits and income tax planning measures, to further improve project value.

 

1.17.8Costs

 

The estimated cost of the program to complete a study to feasibility level is estimated to be $5.53M.

 

amcconsultants.comxxi

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Contents

 

1 Summary ii
  1.1 Introduction ii
  1.2 Property description and ownership ii
  1.3 Accessibility, climate, local resources, infrastructure and physiography iii
  1.4 Geological setting and mineralization iii
  1.5 Exploration iv
  1.6 Drilling v
  1.7 Sample preparation, assay, and QA/QC vi
  1.8 Mineral Resources vii
  1.9 Mineral Reserves viii
  1.10 Mining methods ix
  1.11 Processing and metallurgy x
  1.12 Infrastructure xi
  1.13 Environmental studies, permitting and social or community impact xiii
  1.14 Capital and operating costs xiii
  1.15 Economic analysis xiv
  1.16 Interpretation and conclusions xvi
  1.17 Recommendations xvii
    1.17.1 Geology xvii
    1.17.2 Metallurgy & mineral processing xviii
    1.17.3 Open pit mining xix
    1.17.4 Infrastructure xx
    1.17.5 Tailings storage xx
    1.17.6 Environmental xx
    1.17.7 Financial inputs xxi
    1.17.8 Costs xxi
         
2 Introduction 41
  2.1 General and terms of reference 41
  2.2 The Issuer 41
  2.3 Report authors 41
  2.4 Sources of information 43
  2.5 Other 43
       
3 Reliance on other experts 44
     
4 Property description and location 45
  4.1 Property location 45
  4.2 Bolivian Regulatory framework 45
    4.2.1 Overview 45
    4.2.2 Exploration and mining rights 46
    4.2.3 Environment protection 46
  4.3 Mineral tenure 46
    4.3.1 Introduction 46
    4.3.2 100% owned New Pacific tenure 48
    4.3.3 Mining production contract 48
  4.4 Environmental permits 49
  4.5 Land holding costs 49
  4.6 Surface rights 50
  4.7 Royalties and encumbrances 50
       
5 Accessibility, climate, local resources, infrastructure, and physiography 52
  5.1 Accessibility 52

 

amcconsultants.comxxii

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

  5.2 Physiography 53
  5.3 Climate and vegetation 54
  5.4 Local resources and infrastructure 56
       
6 History   57
  6.1 Property ownership 57
  6.2 Mining 57
  6.3 Exploration 57
    6.3.1 Surface and underground channel sampling 60
    6.3.2 Test drilling 61
  6.4 Historical Resource and Reserve estimate 62
  6.5 Production 62
       
7 Geological setting and mineralization 63
  7.1 Regional geology and metallogeny 63
    7.1.1 Geotectonic framework of Bolivia 63
    7.1.2 Geology of Central Andes 64
      7.1.2.1 Subandean Belt 64
      7.1.2.2 Eastern Cordillera Belt 64
      7.1.2.3 Altiplano Belt 64
      7.1.2.4 Western Cordillera Belt 64
    7.1.3 Regional metallogeny of Central Andes 64
  7.2 Geological setting and mineralization 66
    7.2.1 Property geology 66
    7.2.2 Structural control 71
      7.2.2.1 North Block 72
      7.2.2.2 South Block 72
    7.2.3 Mineralization 73
      7.2.3.1 Sandstone-hosted silver mineralization 73
      7.2.3.2 Porphyritic dacite-hosted silver mineralization 76
      7.2.3.3 Diatreme breccia-hosted silver mineralization 77
      7.2.3.4 Manto-type tin mineralization 78
    7.2.4 Relative timing of hydrothermal alteration and mineralization 78
    7.2.5 Oxidation 79
         
8 Deposit types 81
     
9 Exploration 83
  9.1 Introduction 83
  9.2 Surface chip sampling 85
  9.3 Dump sampling 86
  9.4 Underground chip sampling 86
  9.5 Discussion of exploration results 88
       
10 Drilling 93
  10.1 Drilling overview 93
  10.2 Drilling procedures 95
    10.2.1 Drillhole deviation surveys 95
    10.2.2 Core processing and logging 96
  10.3 Sample recovery 97
  10.4 Drilling programs 97
    10.4.1 Exploration drilling – 2017 - 2018 97
    10.4.2 Definition and exploration drilling - 2019 97
    10.4.3 Definition, exploration, and metallurgical drilling - 2020 98
      10.4.3.1 Definition and geotechnical drilling - 2021 98
    10.4.4 Definition, exploration North prospects, and geotechnical drilling - 2022 98

 

amcconsultants.comxxiii

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

  10.5 Discussion of drilling results   98
    10.5.1 Silver Sand 98
    10.5.2 Snake Hole 101
    10.5.3 Drilling of North prospect 103
  10.6 Review of drilling results   105
  10.7 Drilling conclusions   107
       
11 Sample preparation, analyses, and security   108
  11.1 Sampling methods   108
    11.1.1 Rock chip sampling 108
    11.1.2 Grab sampling 108
    11.1.3 Drillhole sampling 108
  11.2 Sample shipment and security   109
  11.3 Sample preparation and analysis   110
  11.4 Bulk density   111
  11.5 Quality Assurance / Quality Control   112
    11.5.1 Certified Reference Materials 113
      11.5.1.1 Description 113
      11.5.1.2 Discussion 114
      11.5.1.3 Recommendations 117
    11.5.2 Blank samples 117
      11.5.2.1 Description 117
      11.5.2.2 Discussion 118
      11.5.2.3 Recommendations 120
    11.5.3 Duplicate samples 120
      11.5.3.1 Description 120
      11.5.3.2 Discussion 121
      11.5.3.3 Recommendations 124
    11.5.4 Umpire samples 125
  11.6 Conclusions   125
       
12 Data verification   127
     
13 Mineral processing and metallurgical testing   129
  13.1 Introduction   129
  13.2 Historical testwork (2019-2021) 130
  13.3 Recent metallurgical testwork (2022-2023) 132
    13.3.1 Testwork scope 132
    13.3.2 Sample selection and head assay 132
    13.3.3 Mineralogical measurement 138
    13.3.4 Specific gravity 140
    13.3.5 Comminution testing 141
    13.3.6 Bottle roll cyanide leaching tests by Bureau Veritas Mineral / Metallurgy 142
    13.3.7 Cyanide leaching tests by ALS in Metallurgy Kamloops 149
      13.3.7.1 Met Sample 1 NEW 150
      13.3.7.2 Met Sample 1 151
      13.3.7.3 Blended samples between the oxidized domain and the transitional domain 156
      13.3.7.4 Oxidized samples 158
      13.3.7.5 Transitional samples 160
      13.3.7.6 Sulphide samples 162
    13.3.8 Gravity concentration testing 164
      13.3.8.1 Gravity concentration testing for Met Sample 1 NEW 164

 

amcconsultants.comxxiv

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

      13.3.8.2 Gravity concentration testing for Met Sample 15 164
    13.3.9 Reduction of dissolved silver using zinc dust (Merrill Crowe) 168
    13.3.10 Silver loading on the activated carbon 170
    13.3.11 Cyanide destruction 172
    13.3.12 Solid-liquid separation and slurry rheology 175
    13.3.13 Transportable moisture limit 180
    Environmental testing of the detoxed cyanide leach tailings 180
  13.4 Metallurgical predictions 182
       
14 Mineral Resource estimates 185
  14.1 Introduction 185
  14.2 Data used 186
    14.2.1 Drillhole database 186
    14.2.2 Bulk density 188
    14.2.3 Lithological domains 188
    14.2.4 Mineralization domains 188
    14.2.5 Mined-out domains 189
  14.3 Modeling approach 189
  14.4 Statistics and compositing 189
  14.5 Block model parameters 191
  14.6 Variography and grade estimation 192
  14.7 Resource classification 193
  14.8 Block model validation 194
    14.8.1 Visual checks 194
    14.8.2 Swath plots 196
    14.8.3 Statistical comparison 197
    14.8.4 Comparison with other interpolation methods 198
  14.9 Mineral Resource estimate 198
  14.10 Comparison with previous Mineral Resource estimate 200
  14.11 Recommendations 200
       
15 Mineral Reserve estimates 202
  15.1 Mineral Reserve estimates 202
  15.2 Method 203
  15.3 Mining cut-off grade 203
  15.4 Mining dilution and recovery factors 204
  15.5 Open pit optimization 205
  15.6 Mine design 207
  15.7 Items impacting Mineral Reserves 208
       
16 Mining methods 209
  16.1 General description 209
  16.2 Hydrogeological and hydrological considerations 209
    16.2.1 Hydrology and surface water management 209
    16.2.2 Hydrogeology and groundwater management 211
    16.2.3 Recommendations 212
  16.3 Geotechnical considerations 213
    16.3.1 Geotechnical investigation 213
    16.3.2 Rock mass characterization 213
      16.3.2.1 Geotechnical domain 213
      16.3.2.2 Structural model 214
      16.3.2.3 Laboratory testing 216
      16.3.2.4 Rock mass classification 217
      16.3.2.5 Strength parameters for geotechnical design 218
    16.3.3 Slope design 219

 

amcconsultants.comxxv

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

      16.3.3.1 Design acceptance criteria 219
      16.3.3.2 Kinematic analysis 219
      16.3.3.3 Inter-ramp stability analysis 220
      16.3.3.4 Overall slope stability analysis 220
    16.3.4 Gap analysis 220
    16.3.5 Conclusions and recommendations 221
  16.4 Resource model for mining 222
  16.5 Mine design 222
  16.6 Layout of other mining-related facilities 228
  16.7 Mining method 230
    16.7.1 Drill and blast 230
    16.7.2 Load and haul 231
    16.7.3 Stockpile rehandling 232
    16.7.4 Ancillary equipment 232
  16.8 Strategic mining schedule 232
    16.8.1 Approach 232
    16.8.2 Strategic schedule mining sequence 233
    16.8.3 Strategic schedule summary 234
    16.8.4 Strategic schedule process feed 235
  16.9 Tactical mining schedule 236
    16.9.1 Approach 236
    16.9.2 Input parameters 237
      16.9.2.1 Mining inventory 237
      16.9.2.2 Material destinations 237
      16.9.2.3 Scheduling assumptions 238
      16.9.2.4 Fleet assumptions 238
      16.9.2.5 Haulage cycle estimation 239
    16.9.3 Mining sequence 239
    16.9.4 Plant feed schedule 245
    16.9.5 Stockpile size 245
  16.10 Equipment and personnel requirements 246
       
17 Recovery methods 249
  17.1 Summary 249
  17.2 Process design criteria 252
  17.3 Process description 253
    17.3.1 Crushing circuit 253
    17.3.2 Grinding circuit 254
    17.3.3 Cyanide leaching circuit 255
    17.3.4 Zinc precipitation and silver dore production 255
    17.3.5 Tailing treatment 256
    17.3.6 Reagents 257
    17.3.7 Services & water 257
  17.4 Process plant flowsheets 258
  17.5 Process plant layout drawings 258
  17.6 Major equipment lists 270
  17.7 Process control philosophy 271
       
18 Project infrastructure 273
  18.1 Overview 273
  18.2 Site location 273
  18.3 Road access 276
  18.4 Power 276
  18.5 Supply water 277

 

amcconsultants.comxxvi

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

  18.6 Fuel storage 278
  18.7 Offices and warehouse 279
  18.8 Equipment maintenance workshop 279
  18.9 Explosives magazine 279
  18.10 Communications 279
  18.11 Gate house / security 279
  18.12 Accommodations 279
  18.13 Filtered tailings storage facility 279
  18.14 Process plant 282
       
19 Market studies and contracts 284
  19.1 Market studies 284
  19.2 Contracts 285
    19.2.1 Product sales contracts 285
    19.2.2 Services and supplies 286
         
20 Environmental studies, permitting and social or community impact 287
  20.1 Introduction 287
  20.2 Environmental legislation and applicable procedures 287
  20.3 Baseline conditions 288
    20.3.1 Introduction 288
    20.3.2 Baseline of surface water, groundwater, water for human consumption 288
    20.3.3 Air quality / environmental risk baseline 290
    20.3.4 Soil and sediment baseline 290
    20.3.5 Biological baseline 290
    20.3.6 Social baseline 293
    20.3.7 Archaeological baseline 294
    20.3.8 Public Consultation process 295
    20.3.9 Waste management 296
  20.4 Mine closure plan 297
  20.5 Environmental guarantees 297
       
21 Capital and operating costs 298
  21.1 Responsible parties 298
  21.2 Operating cost estimate 298
    21.2.1 Mining cost 299
      21.2.1.1 Labour 299
      21.2.1.2 Equipment operating costs 301
      21.2.1.3 Drill and blast costs 302
      21.2.1.4 Other support mining costs 302
      21.2.1.5 Open pit operating cost summary 303
    21.2.2 Processing & tailings operating costs 306
      21.2.2.1 Process operating costs 306
      21.2.2.2 Tailings Storage Facility operating cost 309
    21.2.3 General and administrative costs 309
    21.2.4 Product selling costs 310
    21.2.5 Operating cost summary 311
  21.3 Capital costs 313
    21.3.1 Infrastructure 313
    21.3.2 Mine development 313
    21.3.3 Process plant 314
      21.3.3.1 Basis of estimate 314
      21.3.3.2 Direct costs 315
      21.3.3.3 Indirect costs 316
    21.3.4 Tailings Storage Facility 317

 

amcconsultants.comxxvii

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

      21.3.4.1 Basis of estimate 318
      21.3.4.2 Direct costs 318
      21.3.4.3 Indirect & other capital costs 319
    21.3.5 Owner’s capital costs 319
      21.3.5.1 Water dam 319
      21.3.5.2 Other owner’s costs 321
  21.4 Capital cost summary 321
       
22 Economic analysis 323
  22.1 Assumptions 323
  22.2 Economic Analysis 324
  22.3 Sensitivity analyses 329
       
23 Adjacent properties 331
  23.1 Colavi Tin Polymetallic mine 331
  23.2 Canutillos Tin Polymetallic mine 331
       
24 Other relevant data and information 332
     
25 Interpretation and conclusions 333
  25.1 General and geology 333
  25.2 Metallurgy and processing 333
    25.2.1 General 333
    25.2.2 Composite characterization 334
    25.2.3 Comminution 334
    25.2.4 Gravity concentration 334
    25.2.5 Silver deportment 334
    25.2.6 Cyanidation 335
      25.2.6.1 Bottle rolling 335
    25.2.7 Process flowsheet 335
    25.2.8 Metallurgical predictions 336
  25.3 Mining and infrastructure 336
  25.4 Risks 337
  25.5 Opportunities 339
       
26 Recommendations 340
  26.1 Introduction 340
  26.2 Quality Assurance / Quality Control 340
  26.3 Mineral Resource 340
  26.4 Metallurgy and mineral processing 341
    26.4.1 Sample selection and characterization 341
    26.4.2 Gravity concentration 341
    26.4.3 Cyanidation 341
    26.4.4 Process water effects 342
    26.4.5 Pre-leach thickening 342
    26.4.6 Optimization of Merrill Crowe 342
    26.4.7 Cyanidation methods 342
    26.4.8 Oxygen intake during cyanide leach 342
    26.4.9 Copper removal from Merrill Crowe precipitates 343
    26.4.10 Preg-robbing, preg-borrowing, and instability of silver cyanide complex 343
  26.5 Hydrogeology and hydrology 343
  26.6 Geotechnical 344
  26.7 Open pit mining 344
  26.8 Infrastructure 344
  26.9 Tailings storage 344

 

amcconsultants.comxxviii

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

  26.10 Environmental 345
  26.11 Financial inputs 345
  26.12 Community and social studies 345
  26.13 Feasibility study 345
  26.14 Recommendation cost summary 345
27 References 346
28 QP Certificates 349

 

Tables

 

Table 1.1 Assumptions for pit optimization vii
Table 1.2 Mineral Resource as of 31 October 2022 viii
Table 1.3 Mineral Reserve estimate as of 19 June 2024 ix
Table 1.4 Average LOM unit operating cost summary xiv
Table 1.5 Capital cost summary xiv
Table 1.6 Selling costs and royalties xv
Table 1.7 Silver Sand deposit – Key economic input assumptions and cost summary xvi
Table 2.1 Persons who prepared or contributed to this Technical Report 42
Table 4.1 Mineral tenure controlled by New Pacific 48
Table 4.2 Fees paid to government in 2024 50
Table 4.3 Royalty applicable to silver in the AMC 50
Table 5.1 Annual weather averages in Potosí area 55
Table 6.1 Exploration work completed by NJ Mining from 2009 to 2015 58
Table 6.2 Selected result of historical surface channel sampling program 61
Table 6.3 Summary of previous drilling programs 61
Table 6.4 Results of historical drill intersections 62
Table 7.1 Mineral occurrences and styles of mineralization 73
Table 9.1 Summary of underground and surface sampling programs 83
Table 9.2 Selected underground sampling results 88
Table 9.3 Summary of underground and surface sampling results 89
Table 10.1 New Pacific drilling by year 93
Table 10.2 Summary of North Prospects drillholes 103
Table 10.3 Drill intercepts for the Silver Sand deposit 105
Table 11.1 New Pacific sample analysis 111
Table 11.2 Silver Sand QA/QC samples by year1 (October 2017 – July 2022) 112
Table 11.3 Silver Sand QA/QC submission rates1 (October 2017 – July 2022) 113
Table 11.4 Silver Sand CRMs (October 2017 – July 2022) 113
Table 11.5 Silver Sand CRM warnings and fails (October 2017 – July 2022) 114
Table 11.6 Comparison between CRM values and analytical results (2020 – July 2022) 116
Table 11.7 Silver Sand coarse blank performance (2020 – July 2022) 118
Table 11.8 Silver Sand pulp blank performance (2021 – July 2022) 120
Table 11.9 Silver sand field duplicate statistical summary (2021 – July 2022) 122
Table 11.10 Silver sand coarse reject duplicate statistical summary (2021 – July 2022) 123
Table 11.11 Silver Sand pulp duplicate statistical summary (2021 – July 2022) 124

 

amcconsultants.comxxix

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 12.1 Assay verification results 127
Table 13.1 Chemical analysis results of silver ore samples 131
Table 13.2 18 individual samples prepared using the coarse assay rejects 133
Table 13.3 16 composite samples prepared for cyanide leaching tests 134
Table 13.4 Compositions of key elements for the 18 composite samples used in the cyanide leaching tests 137
Table 13.5 Contents of minerals in the six mineralized samples 138
Table 13.6 Specific gravity values of the 15 samples used in cyanide leaching tests 141
Table 13.7 Number of drillholes, intervals and sample weights for the composite samples used for the comminution testing 141
Table 13.8 Comminution testing results 142
Table 13.9 Silver recovery, cyanide consumption, and lime consumption from the bottle roll cyanide leaching tests carried out by Bureau Veritas Mineral / Metallurgy 144
Table 13.10 Group average silver recovery and impact of activated carbon on silver recovery 146
Table 13.11 Copper dissolution during 72-hour cyanide leaching 148
Table 13.12 Cyanide leaching results for Met Sample 1 NEW in a lifterbottle 150
Table 13.13 Cyanide leaching results for Met Sample 1 NEW in a mechanically agitated tank 151
Table 13.14 Cyanide leaching results for Met Sample 1 in a lifterbottle 151
Table 13.15 Cyanide leaching results for Met Sample 1 in a mechanically agitated tank 153
Table 13.16 Cyanide leaching results for Met Sample 1 in a smooth bottle 155
Table 13.17 Cyanide leaching results for Met Sample 9 157
Table 13.18 Cyanide leaching results for Met Sample 10 158
Table 13.19 Cyanide leaching results for the oxidized samples 159
Table 13.20 Cyanide leaching results for the transitional samples 161
Table 13.21 Cyanide leaching results for the sulphide samples 163
Table 13.22 Gravity concentration results for Met Sample 15 164
Table 13.23 Cyanide leaching conditions for gravity concentrate and gravity tail for Met Sample 15 166
Table 13.24 Cyanide leaching results for gravity concentrate and gravity tail for Met Sample 15 167
Table 13.25 Operating conditions and results of Merrill Crowe zinc cementation tests 168
Table 13.26 Results of cyanide leaching tests by Kemetco Research 173
Table 13.27 Cyanide destruction operating conditions and results for Met Sample 1 174
Table 13.28 Cyanide destruction operating conditions and results for Met Samples 2, 5, and 11 175
Table 13.29 Thickener design criteria and operating parameters 176
Table 13.30 Apparent viscosity and yield stress 177
Table 13.31 Recommended pressure filter operating parameters 179
Table 13.32 Flow moisture point (FMP) and TML 180
Table 13.33 Results of ABA and NAG tests for the detoxed cyanide leach tailing solids 181
Table 13.34 Met Sample 1 NEW results summary 183
Table 13.35 Met Sample 1 results summary 184
Table 14.1 Silver Sand Mineral Resource as of 31 October 2022 185
Table 14.2 Drillhole data used in the estimate 186

 

amcconsultants.comxxx

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 14.3 Grade capping for silver and arsenic 190
Table 14.4 Ag statistics of raw, composited, and capped assay data 191
Table 14.5 Block model parameters 191
Table 14.6 Ag grade interpolation search parameters 192
Table 14.7 Class interpolation search parameters 193
Table 14.8 Statistical comparison of capped assay data and block model for Ag 198
Table 14.9 Cut-off grade and conceptual pit parameters 198
Table 14.10 Silver Sand Mineral Resource as of 31 October 2022 199
Table 14.11 Mineral Resources within and outside the AMC 199
Table 14.12 Model sensitivity to cut-offs 199
Table 14.13 Mineral Resource comparison with previous 2019 estimate 200
Table 15.1 Mineral Reserve estimate as of 19 June 2024 202
Table 15.2 Mineral Reserves within and outside the AMC 203
Table 15.3 Cut-off grade input parameters and calculations for Mineral Reserves 204
Table 15.4 Mining dilution and recovery parameters 204
Table 15.5 Slope angles for pit optimization 205
Table 15.6 Pit optimization results 206
Table 16.1 Open pit catchment areas and corresponding diversion channels 209
Table 16.2 Estimated pumping requirements 211
Table 16.3 Geotechnical domains and their correlation with lithological units 213
Table 16.4 Structural domains and their correlation with lithological units 215
Table 16.5 Mean sets for each structural domain 216
Table 16.6 Geotechnical domains and their correlation with lithological units 216
Table 16.7 RQD values for each domain 217
Table 16.8 Index properties and strength parameters for each domain 218
Table 16.9 Design acceptance criteria values (Read & Stacey, 2009) 219
Table 16.10 Slope design recommendations 220
Table 16.11 Main Pit phases 223
Table 16.12 Ore and waste tonnage within the ultimate pit design 228
Table 16.13 Stockpile capacities 230
Table 16.14 Waste dump storage capacities 230
Table 16.15 Proposed drill and blast parameters 231
Table 16.16 ROM inventory for tactical schedule 237
Table 16.17 Mine fleet productivity assumptions 238
Table 16.18 Haulage assumptions 239
Table 16.19 LOM production schedule by year 243
Table 16.20 Schedule milestones 244
Table 17.1 Process design criteria 252
Table 17.2 Equipment list summary 270
Table 19.1 Average silver prices by period 284
Table 21.1 Average LOM unit operating cost summary 298
Table 21.2 Shift coverage and crew count 299
Table 21.3 Shift schedule configuration 300

 

amcconsultants.comxxxi

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 21.4 Fixed staffing summary for the open pit 300
Table 21.5 Summary of other mining costs 303
Table 21.6 Mine operating cost summary 303
Table 21.7 Mine operating cost by period, in US$M 304
Table 21.8 Process unit cost summary 306
Table 21.9 Summary of estimated mill operating cost 307
Table 21.10 Labour details - Processing 308
Table 21.11 Steel wear parts 308
Table 21.12 Consumable details - Processing 309
Table 21.13 TSF operating costs 309
Table 21.14 G&A costs 310
Table 21.15 Product selling costs 310
Table 21.16 Operating cost by year 312
Table 21.17 Surface infrastructure project capital cost estimate 313
Table 21.18 Mine development capital costs. 314
Table 21.19 Mill area capital estimate 316
Table 21.20 Process plant direct capital breakdown by area 317
Table 21.21 Process Plant direct capital breakdown by discipline 317
Table 21.22 TSF direct capital costs 318
Table 21.23 Indirect & other capital costs for the TSF 319
Table 21.24 Water dam capital costs 320
Table 21.25 Capital cost summary 322
Table 22.1 Depreciation rates 323
Table 22.2 Selling costs 324
Table 22.3 Silver Sand deposit – Key economic input assumptions and cost summary 325
Table 22.4 Annual Silver Sand Project production and cashflow forecast 326
Table 22.5 Sensitivity analysis by input cost 329
Table 22.6 Sensitivity analysis of silver prices and discount rates 329
Table 26.1 Cost summary estimate for recommendations 345

 

Figures

 

Figure 1.1 Preliminary site infrastructure layout xii
Figure 4.1 Location of Silver Sand Property 45
Figure 4.2 Mining areas and MPC 47
Figure 5.1 Administrative location and transportation access of Silver Sand Property 52
Figure 5.2 Physiographic zones of Bolivia 53
Figure 5.3 Climate map of Bolivia 54
Figure 5.4 Vegetation map of Bolivia 55
Figure 6.1 Mineralization zones defined in previous exploration programs 59
Figure 6.2 Historical channel sampling from Zone I, Silver Sand Property 60
Figure 7.1 Bolivian geotectonic framework 63
Figure 7.2 Bolivian metallogenic belts 65
Figure 7.3 Major deposits in the Bolivian Tin Belt 66

 

amcconsultants.comxxxii

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 7.4 Unconformity and thrust fault contact 67
Figure 7.5 Thrust Fault north of Snake Hole 68
Figure 7.6 General geology of Silver Sand Property 69
Figure 7.7 Stratigraphic column for the Property 70
Figure 7.8 Transfer zones linked to mineralization at Silver Sand 71
Figure 7.9 Location of North and South Block 72
Figure 7.10 Silver mineralization in drill cores 74
Figure 7.11 Cross Section 5250, Silver Sand Zone 76
Figure 7.12 Crackle breccia intervals in altered porphyritic dacite 77
Figure 7.13 Diatreme breccia outcrop in Aullagas zone 77
Figure 7.14 Example of tin mineralization associated contact Tarapaya with Cretaceous sandstone 78
Figure 7.15 Oxidation material in core 79
Figure 7.16 Transition material in core 80
Figure 8.1 Conceptual model of mineralization controls at Silver Sand Property 82
Figure 9.1 Location of historic adits and mine dumps 84
Figure 9.2 Results from the Jesus adit trench 85
Figure 9.3 Channel sampling at the Jardan Prospect 86
Figure 9.4 Underground mapping and sampling at Mascota prospect 87
Figure 9.5 Mineralized structures and fractures in historically mined Snake zone glory hole 89
Figure 9.6 El Fuerte prospect main structure 90
Figure 9.7 Aullagas prospect outcrop 91
Figure 9.8 El Bronce prospect 91
Figure 9.9 Jisas prospect outcrop photo 92
Figure 10.1 Location map of drillholes in Silver Sand area 94
Figure 10.2 Silver Sand drilling 95
Figure 10.3 Jisas North prospect drilling, showing “quicklog” process 96
Figure 10.4 Silver Sand mineralization – plan view 99
Figure 10.5 Silver Sand mineralization – 3D perspective 100
Figure 10.6 Cross Section 5250, Silver Sand center area 100
Figure 10.7 Cross Section 6400, Silver Sand south area 101
Figure 10.8 Location of drillholes, Snake Hole prospect 102
Figure 10.9 Drillholes of North Block 104
Figure 11.1 New Pacific Betanoz core logging and sampling facility 109
Figure 11.2 New Pacific Betanoz core processing facility 110
Figure 11.3 Control chart for CDN-ME-1501 (Ag) (2019 – July 2022) 115
Figure 11.4 Control chart for CDN-ME-1603 (Ag) (2020 – July 2022) 115
Figure 11.5 Control chart for CDN-ME-1810 (Ag) (2020 – July 2022) 116
Figure 11.6 Coarse blank control chart (2020 – July 2022) 119
Figure 11.7 Pulp blank control chart (2021 – July 2022) 120
Figure 11.8 Silver Sand field duplicate RPD and scatter plot (2021 – July 2022) 122
Figure 11.9 Silver Sand coarse reject duplicate RPD and scatter plot (2021 – July 2022) 123
Figure 11.10 Silver Sand pulp duplicate RPD and scatter plot (2021 – July 2022) 124

 

amcconsultants.comxxxiii

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 13.1 Silver deportment in Met Sample 9 (15% oxide + 85% transitional), Met Sample 13 (high-grade sulphide sample), and Met Sample 15 (2020 high-grade sulphide sample) 139
Figure 13.2 Copper deportment in Met Sample 9 (15% oxide + 85% transitional), Met Sample 13 (high-grade sulphide sample), and Met Sample 15 (2020 high-grade sulphide sample) 139
Figure 13.3 Sulphur deportment in Met Sample 9 (15% oxide + 85% transitional), Met Sample 13 (high-grade sulphide sample), and Met Sample 15 (2020 high-grade sulphide sample) 140
Figure 13.4 Cyanide consumption as a function of sulphur content in the feed 147
Figure 13.5 Relationship between copper dissolution and cyanide consumption 149
Figure 13.6 Silver precipitation as a function of the ratio of zinc dust to the combined amount of dissolved silver and copper for Test 2 (JR7712) 169
Figure 13.7 Silver precipitation kinetics of Test 3 (JR7726) with single dosage of zinc dust 170 170
Figure 13.8 Silver loading on the activated carbon 171
Figure 13.9 Copper loading on activated carbon 172
Figure 13.10 pH reading during humidity cell testing for Met Sample 1 182
Figure 13.11 LOM annual ore blends 183
Figure 14.1 Silver Sand drillhole location plan 187
Figure 14.2 3D view of mineralization domains looking north-east 188
Figure 14.3 Pie-chart of the percentage volume by domains 189
Figure 14.4 Probability plot for Ag 190
Figure 14.5 3D view of the resource classification 194
Figure 14.6 Plan view of the block model and drillholes 195
Figure 14.7 Block model versus drillhole grade on Section 5200 196
Figure 14.8 All domains swath plot for silver 197
Figure 15.1 Pit optimization results 207
Figure 15.2 Final pit geometry 208
Figure 16.1 Surface water catchments for MP2, MP3, MP4, and MP5 210
Figure 16.2 Surface water catchments for MP6 and MP7 210
Figure 16.3 Surface water catchments for MP7 and MP8 211
Figure 16.4 Spatial distribution of the geotechnical domains (left: isotropic view, right: plan view) 214
Figure 16.5 Structural model (blue: regional; red: local; green: minor) 214
Figure 16.6 Spatial distribution of the structural domains (left: isotropic view, right: plan view) 215
Figure 16.7 Test results and the Hoek-Brown failure envelope for each geotechnical domain 217
Figure 16.8 Boxplot of GSI or each geotechnical domain 218
Figure 16.9 Recommended IRAk for each structural domain 219
Figure 16.10 Ultimate pit design with long sections 224
Figure 16.11 Section view A1 - A2 with Ag grade (g/t) 225
Figure 16.12 Section view B1 - B2 with Ag grade (g/t) 225
Figure 16.13 Main Pit phase designs 226
Figure 16.14 General site layout 229
Figure 16.15 Indicative value by mining area 233

 

amcconsultants.comxxxiv

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 16.16 Total material mined by phase 234
Figure 16.17 Process feed tonnes and grade 235
Figure 16.18 Strategic mine plan stockpile balance 236
Figure 16.19 Tactical schedule material flow 237
Figure 16.20 Total material mined by phase 240
Figure 16.21 Mining sequence 240
Figure 16.22 End of period plans from Year -2 to Year 2 241
Figure 16.23 End of period plans from Year 5 to the end-of-mine 242
Figure 16.24 Tactical schedule plant feed 245
Figure 16.25 Tactical schedule stockpile inventory 246
Figure 16.26 Open pit equipment requirements at peak production 247
Figure 16.27 Open-pit workforce requirements 248
Figure 17.1 Leaching-CCD PFSD 1 250
Figure 17.2 Leaching-CCD PFSD 251
Figure 17.3 Process flowsheet: Comminution 259
Figure 17.4 Process flowsheet: Leaching 260
Figure 17.5 Process flowsheet: Counter current decantation 261
Figure 17.6 Process flowsheet: Merrill Crowe (1) 262
Figure 17.7 Process flowsheet: Merrill Crowe (2) 263
Figure 17.8 Process flowsheet: Tailings dewatering 264
Figure 17.9 Process flowsheet: Refinery 265
Figure 17.10 Process flowsheet: Services (Gas) 266
Figure 17.11 Process flowsheet: Reagents 267
Figure 17.12 Process flowsheet: Services (Water) 268
Figure 17.13 Site plan: Process plant area 269
Figure 18.1 Silver Sand site location 274
Figure 18.2 Preliminary site infrastructure layout 275
Figure 18.3 Water dam overview 277
Figure 18.4 Water dam cross section 278
Figure 18.5 TSF Overview 280
Figure 18.6 TSF sectional view 281
Figure 18.7 Topography and infrastructure plant layout 283
Figure 19.1 Historical silver prices (May 2019 to May 2024) 285
Figure 20.1 Distribution of samples by location 289
Figure 21.1 Mine unit operating costs by period 305
Figure 22.1 Pre-tax project cashflow 327
Figure 22.2 Post-tax project cashflow 328
Figure 22.3 Sensitivity analysis of silver prices and discount rates graph 330

 

Distribution list

1 e-copy to New Pacific Metals Corp.

1 e-copy to AMC Vancouver office

 

amcconsultants.comxxxv

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Abbreviations & acronyms

 

Abbreviations & acronyms Description
$ United States dollar
% Percentage
° Degree
°C Degrees Celsius
µm Micron
3D Three-dimensional
AACN National Competent Environmental Authority (Autoridad Ambiental Competente Nacional)
AAS Atomic absorption spectroscopy
AES Atomic Emission Spectroscopy
Ag Silver
AJAM Jurisdictional Mining Administrative Authority (Autoridad Jurisdiccional Administrativa Minera)
Alcira Minera Alcira Sociedad Anónima Alcira S.A.
ALS ALS laboratories
AMC Administrative Mining Contract
AMC Consultants AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd.
ARD Acid Rock Drainage
As Arsenic
ATE Temporary Special Authorization
Au Gold
BFA Bench face angle
BOB Bolivian Boliviano
CaCO3 Calcium carbonate
CaO Calcium oxide
Capex Capital expenditure
CCD Counter current decantation
CCR Crusher Control Room
CIM Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
cm Centimetre
CN Cyanide
COG Cut-off grade
COMIBOL Corporación Minera de Bolivia
Congress Congress of Bolivia
CPE Political Constitution of the State (Constitución Política del Estado)
CR Critically Endangered
CRM Certified reference material
CSA Canadian Securities Administrators
Cu Copper
CV Coefficient of Variation
d Day
DDH Diamond drillhole
DIA Environmental License
DMS Dense Media Separation
dmtpa Dry metric tonnes per annum

 

amcconsultants.comxxxvi

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Abbreviations & acronyms Description
dmtph Dry metric tonnes per hour
DO2 Dissolved oxygen
DTM Digital Terrain Model
DWi Drop Weight Index
E East
EEIA-AI Analytical Environmental Impact Assessment Study
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EN Endangered
ENE East-northeast
EP Eastern pit
EPCM Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management
Excel Microsoft Excel
FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation
FNCA Environmental Categorization Form (Formulario de Categorización Ambiental)
FOS Factor of Safety
g Gram
G&A General and Administration
g/L Grams per litre
g/t Grams per tonne
GEOBOL Servicio Geologico de Bolivia
GPS Global positioning system
GU Geotechnical Unit
h Hour
Haulage Hexagon Mining’s Mineplan Haulage
HG High grade
HLS Heavy Liquids Separation
HMI Human-Machine Interface
hr Hours
ICP Inductively Coupled Plasma
ID2 Inverse distance squared
ID3 Inverse distance cubed
IES International Electrotechnical Commission
IRA Inter-Ramp Angle
IRAK Kinematic Inter-Ramp Angle
IRR Internal rate of return
ISO International Organization for Standardization
ITASCA ITASCA Chile SpA
kg Kilogram
kg/L Kilogram per litre
kg/t Kilogram per tonne
km Kilometre
km2 Square kilometre
kPa Kilopascal
kt Thousand tonnes
kV Kilovolt
kW Kilowatt

 

amcconsultants.comxxxvii

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Abbreviations & acronyms Description
kWh/t Kilowatt-hour per tonne
kWh/m3 Kilowatt-hour per cubic metre
L Litre
L/h Litre per hour
lab Laboratory
LCT Locked cycle test
Leapfrog Leapfrog Geo 4.0
LG Low grade
LOM Life-of-mine
M Million
m Metre
m2 Square metre
m3 Cubic metre
m3/h Cubic metre per hour
M m3 Million metres cubed
masl Metres above sea level
Mbcm Million bulk cubic metres
MC Master composites
MCC Motor Control Center
MCR Main Control Room
mg Milligram
mg/L Milligram per litre
MIBC Methyl isobutyl carbinol
Minemax Minemax Scheduler 7
mm Millimetre
MMAYA Ministry of Environment and Water protection (Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Agua)
MMM Ministry of Mining and Metallurgy
Moz Million ounces
MP Main pit
MPC Mining Production Contract
MS Mass spectroscopy
Mt Million tonnes
Mtpa Million tonnes per annum
mV millivolt
MW Megawatt
MWh Megawatt per hour
N North
NaCN Sodium cyanide
NaOH Sodium hydroxide
NE North-east
New Pacific New Pacific Metals Corp.
NI 43-101 National Instrument 43-101
NJ Mining Ningde Jungie Mining Industry Co. Ltd.
NN Nearest neighbour
NNE North-northeast
NNW North-northwest

 

amcconsultants.comxxxviii

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Abbreviations & acronyms Description
NP Northern pit
NPV Net Present Value
NW North-west
OK Ordinary kriging
Opex Operating expenditure
OSC Competent sectoral agency (organismo sectorial competente)
oz Troy ounce
p.a. Per annum
P80 80% Passing
Pb Lead
PCS Process Control System
PDC Process Design Criteria
PEA Preliminary Economic Assessment
PFS Pre-feasibility Study
pH pH is a measure of hydrogen ion concentration; a measure of the acidity or alkalinity of a solution
PID Proportional-integral-derivative
PLC Programmable Logic Controller
PLS Pregnant leach solution
PoF Probability of Failure
ppm Parts per million
Property Silver Sand Property
QA/QC Quality assurance and quality control
QP Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101
RAAM Environmental Regulations for Mining Activities, (Reglamento Ambiental para Actividades Mineras)
RC Reverse circulation drilling
2022 Technical Report Technical Report
RF Revenue Factor
RGGA General Environmental Management Regulation (Reglamento General de Gestión Ambiental)
RGRS Regulation for Solid Waste Management (Reglamento de Gestión de Residuos Sólidos)
RMCA Regulation on Atmospheric Contamination (Reglamento en materia de Contaminación Atmosférica)
RMCH Water Pollution Regulation (Reglamento en materia de Contaminación Hídrica)
RMSP Regulation for Handling of Hazardous Substances (Reglamento para Manejo de Sustancias Peligrosas)
ROM Run-of-Mine
RPCA Environmental Prevention and Control Regulation (Reglamento de Prevención y Control Ambiental)
RPD Relative paired difference
RQD Rock quality designation
RSD Relative standard deviation
S South; Sulphur
SAG Semi-autogenous grinding
SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
SCSE Sag circuit specific energy
SD Standard deviation

 

amcconsultants.comxxxix

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Abbreviations & acronyms Description
SEDAR System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval
SERNAP National Protected Areas Service (Servicio Nacional de Areas Protegidas)
SI units SI (Système International d’Unités) is a globally agreed system of units
Silver Sand Silver Sand Property
SIPX Sodium Isopropyl Xanthate
SMC SAG Mill Comminution
Sn Tin
SO2 Sulfur dioxide
SSE South-southeast
STU Special tax unit
SW South-west
t Tonne
t/m3 Tonne per cubic metre
t/op hr Tonnes per operating hour
TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
tpd Tonnes per day
tph Tonnes per hour
Trans. Transitional
TSF Tailings storage facility
UG Underground
UNDP United Nations Development Program
UPS Uninterruptible Power Supply
US United States
US$ United States dollar
US$/oz United States dollar per ounce
US$/t United States dollar per tonne
UTO Oruro Technical University
VAT Value-added tax
VGF Vibrating grizzly feeder
VRA Vertical rate of advance
VU Vulnerable
W West
W Tungsten
w/w Ratio of weight expressed as a percentage
Yr Year
Zn Zinc

 

amcconsultants.comx1

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

2Introduction

 

2.1General and terms of reference

 

AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. (AMC Consultants) was commissioned by New Pacific Metals Corp. (New Pacific or the Company) to prepare an independent Technical Report (2024 Technical Report) on the Silver Sand project (Property or Silver Sand) in the Potosí Department, in the Plurinational State of Bolivia (Bolivia). In preparation of this report AMC Consultants collaborated with Halyard Inc. and NewFields Canada Mining & Environment ULC. The 2024 Technical Report report provides the results of a Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS) for the Property. The previous Technical Report on the Property titled “Silver Sand Deposit Preliminary Economic Assessment for New Pacific Metals Corp. Potosí, Bolivia” (2022 Technical Report), has an effective date of 30 November 2022.

 

The 2024 Technical Report has been prepared to a standard which is in accordance with the requirements of National Instrument 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (NI 43-101), of the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) for lodgment on CSA’s System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR).

 

2.2The Issuer

 

New Pacific is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the province of British Columbia, Canada and is in the business of exploring and developing precious metal mining properties in South America and Canada. Through its three wholly owned subsidiaries Minera Alcira Sociedad Anónima Alcira S.A. (Alcira), Empresa Jisas – Jardan SRL, and Empresa El Cateador SRL, New Pacific collectively holds exploration and mining agreements over an approximate 60 square kilometres (km2) contiguous area. The Silver Sand project is located in Potosí Department, Bolivia.

 

New Pacific is listed on the TSX Exchange (symbol NUAG) and the NYSE American (symbol NEWP).

 

2.3Report authors

 

The names and details of persons who prepared, or who have assisted the Qualified Persons (QPs) in the preparation of this report, are listed in Table 2.1.

 

amcconsultants.com41

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 2.1 Persons who prepared or contributed to this Technical Report

 

Qualified Persons responsible for the preparation of this Technical Report
Qualified Person Position Employer Independent
of New Pacific
Date of last
site visit
Professional
designation
Sections of
Report
Mr E. Tucker Regional Manager – Canada / Principal Mining Engineer AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd.

Yes

No visit P.Eng. (BC)

2-6, 20, 23, 24, Part of 1, 25, 26

Ms D. Nussipakynova Principal Geologist BBA, formerly with AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. Yes 28-29 May 2022 P.Geo. (BC) 7-12, 14, Part of 1, 25, 26, 27
Mr A. Holloway Process Director Halyard Inc. Yes

14-16 Jan 2020

P.Eng.(ON)

13, 17, 19, Part of 1, 21, 25, 26, 27

Mr W. Rogers Principal Mining Engineer / Open Pit Manager AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. Yes

4-5 May 2023

P.Eng. (BC)

15, 16, 22, Part of 1, 21, 25, 26, 27

Mr M. Molavi Principal Mining Engineer AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. Yes No visit P.Eng. (BC)

Part of 1, 18, 25, 26

Mr L. Botham Principal Engineer NewFields Canada Mining & Environment ULC Yes No visit P.Eng. (SK) Part of 1, 18, 21, 25, 26
Other Experts who assisted the Qualified Persons in the preparation of this Technical Report
Expert Position Employer Independent of
New Pacific
Visited site Sections of
Report
Mr Y. (Alex) Zhang Vice President, Exploration New Pacific Metals Corp. No Yes, multiple times 1-11 and 23
Mr J. Zhang Manager, Projects New Pacific Metals Corp. No Yes All

Mr D. VanDoorselaere

Vice President, Operations New Pacific Metals Corp. No Yes All
Mr L. Kaufmann Senior Mining Engineer AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. Yes

No

Part of 1, 3, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, 25, 26

Mr H. Orrego Senior Mechanical Engineer AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. Yes

Yes (4-5 May 2023)

18
Ms K. Zunica Senior Geologist AMC Consultants Pty Ltd Yes No 11

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

AMC Consultants acknowledges the numerous contributions from New Pacific in the preparation of this report and is particularly appreciative of prompt and willing assistance of Mr Alex Zhang and Mr Jason Zhang.

 

Ms Dinara Nussipakynova visited the Property on 28-29 May 2022, while employed by AMC Mining Consultants Ltd. At the publication time of this report, she is employed by BBA. All aspects of the project were examined, specifically drill core, drilling and core processing procedures, initial Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) procedures, and database management. Mr Andrew Holloway of Halyard visited the Property in January 2020. All aspects relating to surface infrastructure, plant location, drill core, and geometallurgical considerations were inspected at that time. Mr Wayne Rogers and Mr Hector Orrego visited the Property on 4-5 May 2023, all aspects relating to mining and infrastructure were inspected at that time.

 

amcconsultants.com42

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

2.4Sources of information

 

In preparing this Report, the QPs have relied on various geological maps, reports, and other technical information provided by New Pacific. AMC Consultants has reviewed and analyzed the data provided and drawn its own conclusions augmented by its direct field observations. The key information used in this report is listed in Section 27 References, at the end of this report.

 

New Pacific’s internal technical information reviewed by the QPs was adequately documented, comprehensive and of good technical quality. It was gathered, prepared, and compiled by competent technical persons. The QPs used their professional judgement and made recommendations in this report where it deems further work is warranted.

 

2.5Other

 

This report includes the tabulation of numerical data which involves a degree of rounding for the purpose of resource and reserve estimation. The QPs do not consider any rounding of the numerical data to be material to the project.

 

All currency amounts and commodity prices are stated in US dollars and any costs provided by New Pacific were in US dollars ($). Quantities are stated in metric (SI) units. Commodity weights of measure are in grams (g) or percent (%) unless otherwise stated.

 

A draft of the report was provided to New Pacific for checking for factual accuracy. The effective date of the report is 19 June 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com43

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

3Reliance on other experts

 

The QP has relied, in respect to certain information concerning legal matters relevant to the Technical Report, upon the work of the Experts listed below. To the extent permitted under NI 43-101, the QPs disclaim responsibility for the relevant section of the Report listed below:

 

·Experts: Mattias Garrón (Partner), PPO Law Offices, La Paz, Bolivia, as advised in letters to New Pacific Metals Corp both with an effective date of 10 October 2022.
·Report, opinion, or statement relied upon: Legal Opinion regarding the Silver Sand project and re: Mining Productive Contract with Corporacion Minera de Bolivia (COMIBOL).
·Extent of reliance: full reliance following a review by the QP.
·Report, opinion, or statement relied upon: Bolivian regulatory framework from Aguirre (2019) and Bufete Aguirre Soc. Civ. (2017).
·Portion of Technical Report to which disclaimer applies: Section 4.2.
·Portion of Technical Report to which disclaimer applies: Section 4.3.

 

The QP has relied, in respect to certain information concerning environmental and social aspects relevant to the Technical Report, upon the work of the Experts listed below. This work has been summarized and provided by New Pacific. To the extent permitted under NI 43-101, the QPs disclaim responsibility for the relevant sections of the Report listed below:

 

·Experts: Independent firm, Tierralta S.R.L. La Paz, Bolivia.
·Report, opinion, or statement relied upon: Environmental baseline information for the project from the Analytical Environmental Impact Assessment Study (EEIA-AI), 30 November 2022 (updated June 2024).
·Extent of reliance: full reliance following a review by the QP.
·Portion of Technical Report to which disclaimer applies: Sections 20.1 - 20.3.5.
·Experts: Independent firm, Cumbre del Sajama S.A.
·Report, opinion, or statement relied upon: Final Report titled Socioeconomic Baseline, Risk Analysis and Community Relationship Recommendations for New Pacific Metals Corp - Silver Sands Project in the Department of Potosi-Bolivia, May 2018 (updated June 2024).
·Extent of reliance: full reliance following a review by the QP.
·Portion of Technical Report to which disclaimer applies: Section 20.3.6.
·Experts: Independent firm, CPM Investigación & Desarrollo, based in La Paz, Bolivia.
·Report, opinion, or statement relied upon: Archaeological studies, report date 29 November 2022 (updated June 2024).
·Extent of reliance: full reliance following a review by the QP.
·Portion of Technical Report to which disclaimer applies: Section 20.3.7.

 

The QP has relied, in respect to certain information concerning tax matters relevant to the Technical Report, upon the work of the Experts listed below. To the extent permitted under NI 43-101, the QPs disclaim responsibility for the relevant section of the Report listed below.

 

·Experts: PPO Legal & Tax Offices, Santa Cruz, Bolivia.
·Report, opinion, or statement relied upon: Analysis of the Bolivian Mining Surtax effective application, 8 August 2023.
·Extent of reliance: full reliance following a review by the QP.
·Portion of Technical Report to which disclaimer applies: Section 22.1.

 

amcconsultants.com44

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

4Property description and location

 

4.1Property location

 

The Property is situated in the Colavi District of Potosí Department in south-western Bolivia, 33 kilometres (km) north-east of Potosí city, the department capital. The approximate geographic centre of the Property is 19°22’ 4.97” S latitude and 65°31’ 22.93” W longitude at an elevation of 4,072 metres above sea level (masl). The location of the Property is shown in Figure 4.1.

 

Figure 4.1 Location of Silver Sand Property

 

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

4.2Bolivian Regulatory framework

 

The following section on the Bolivian Regulatory framework borrows from Aguirre (2019) and Bufete Aguirre Soc. Civ. (2017).

 

4.2.1Overview

 

Bolivia began opening the mining industry to private investment in the 1980s. In 1997, a completely new Mining Code (the 1997 Code) governing most matters relating to mining activities was enacted. The 1997 Code followed the concession system considering mining concessions as real estate property which as such could be transferred, contributed to the capital of companies, mortgaged, bartered, sold, and subject to inheritance laws under the Civil Code.

 

A new and complete Mining and Metallurgy Law No 535 was introduced on 28 May 2014 (the 2014 Mining Law), to replace the 1997 Code. The 2014 Mining Law was modified by Law No. 845 of 24 October 2016 (the 2016 Mining Law) by the Bolivian Congress.

 

The 2014 and 2016 Mining Laws set out rules in relation to:

 

·The procedures for the granting of new mining rights.
·The procedures for a change from the old mining concession system to the new system of Administrative Mining Contract (AMC) mandated by the new legislation based on the Constitution.

 

amcconsultants.com45

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

4.2.2Exploration and mining rights

 

Exploration and mining rights in Bolivia are granted by the Ministry of Mines and Metallurgy through the Jurisdictional Mining Administrative Authority (Autoridad Jurisdiccional Administrativa Minera; AJAM). Under the new Mining Laws, tenure is granted as either an AMC or an exploration license. Tenure held under previous legislation was converted to Temporary Special Authorizations (ATEs), formerly known as “mining concessions”, under the new Mining Laws. These ATEs are required to be consolidated to new 25-hectare sized cuadriculas (mining areas) and converted to AMCs, under a process that is called “Adequation”. AMCs created by conversion recognize existing rights of exploration and / or exploitation and development, including treatment, refining, and / or trading.

 

AMCs have a fixed term of 30 years and can be extended for a further 30 years if certain conditions are met. Each contract requires ongoing work and the submission of work and investment plans to AJAM.

 

Exploration licenses are valid for a maximum of five years and provide the holder with the first right of refusal for an AMC.

 

In specific areas, mineral tenure is owned by the Bolivian state mining corporation, COMIBOL. In these areas development and production agreements can be obtained by entering into a Mining Production Contract (MPC) with COMIBOL.

 

4.2.3Environment protection

 

Depending on the nature and scope of the activities to be conducted, the operator may need specific licenses or dispensations from the environmental authorities under the Ministry of Environment and Water or the Departmental Governorships. This applies to projects that may require consultation with a population that could be affected by the project.

 

The main law governing environmental protection, in general, is Law 1333 of 27 April 1992, which is regulated by various Supreme Decrees of the Executive Branch. The special Decree containing the mining rules is of primary importance. Strict parameters must be followed for the protection of the environment. Breach of environmental obligations may even trigger criminal liabilities under the Constitution.

 

Licenses must be updated depending on the changes triggered by the ongoing activities and operations. An Environmental Impact Assessment (EEIA) is normally required to obtain the appropriate license. Specialized environmental authorities follow up and control compliance. As required under the licenses, any impact on the environment must be notified to the authorities. Remediation measures and rehabilitation projects are compulsory. For mine closure, the operator must create a financial reserve that is maintained on an annual basis. A final closure study on the effect on the environment would be required in due time. Under a special law known as the “Mother Earth Law”, a certain requirement of restitution must be met.

 

4.3Mineral tenure

 

4.3.1Introduction

 

New Pacific’s Silver Sand Property encompasses a combination of 100% owned mining areas (AMCs by conversion) and an MPC with COMIBOL which gives the Company access to approximately 60 km2, in this emerging silver district.

 

amcconsultants.com46

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 4.2 Mining areas and MPC

 

 

Notes: MPC Area = Mining Production Contract with the Bolivian Mining Corporation, New Pacific Property has 100% mineral tenure ownership.

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com47

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

4.3.2100% owned New Pacific tenure

 

The Property originally comprised 17 ATEs, now converted to a consolidated AMC covering an area of 3.1656 km2. These ATEs were acquired by New Pacific in its original purchase of the interests of Alcira, now New Pacific’s wholly-owned subsidiary. They are valid for 30 years from the date of registration of the AMC (February 2020) and can be extended for an additional 30 years.

 

In accordance with the 2014 and 2016 Mining Laws, New Pacific (through Alcira) submitted to AJAM, all required documents for the consolidation and conversion of the original 17 ATEs, which comprise the core of the Silver Sand project, to cuadriculas and AMCs. The conversion was initially approved by AJAM in February 2018. On 6 January 2020, Alcira signed an AMC with AJAM pursuant to which the 17 ATEs were consolidated into one mining area named as Arena De Plata (Silver Sand) with an area of 3.1656 km2. This AMC was registered with the mining register on 14 February 2020, mining registration number 1-05-1500055-0001-21, the notary process was completed, and registration was published in the mining gazette on 15 July 2021.

 

In addition, New Pacific acquired 100% interest in three continuous concessions consisting of ATEs called Jisas, Jardan, and El Bronce originally owned by third-party private entities. These three ATE’s, were converted to AMCs, totalling 2.25 km2. The Jisas and Jardan concessions were acquired in July 2018 and are held through 100% owned subsidiary Jisasjardan SRL. The Bronce concession was acquired in late 2019 and is held through 100% owned subsidiary Empresa Minera Cateador SRL.

 

The total area of AMCs under full control of the Company is 5.42 km2. This conversion process has already been completed for all areas.

 

Table 4.1 summarizes New Pacific’s Silver Sand Mineral Tenure held on a 100% basis. All mining areas are valid for 30 years of the signing of an Administrative Resolution.

 

Table 4.1 Mineral tenure controlled by New Pacific

 

Mining Area ID Mining registry Name Concession
type
Size in
hectares
Title holder Expiry date
1500055

1-05-1500055-

0001-21

Arena De Plata AMC 316.56 Minera Alcira SA 14 February 2050
1500410

1-05-1500410-

0094-22

Jisasjardan AMC 175 Jisasjardan SRL

04 December 2050

1501194

1-05-1501194-

0093-22

Bronce AMC 50 Empresa Minera Cateador SRL 15 January 2051
  Total 541.56    

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2024.

 

4.3.3Mining production contract

 

New Pacific, through Alcira, entered into a Mining Production Contract (MPC) with COMIBOL on 11 January 2019 and an updated MPC was entered with COMIBOL on 19 January 2022 which covers 12 ATEs and 196 cuadriculas for an area of approximately 55 km2 that surround and overlap the Silver Sand core area. The Company continues to engage with COMIBOL, to obtain the ratification and approval of the signed MPC at the Silver Sand project by the Plurinational Legislative Assembly of Bolivia. The Company and COMIBOL have refined the MPC workplan to concentrate exclusively on claims immediately adjacent to the Silver Sand project boundary. This streamlined landholding, while maintaining the core value of the MPC to the Silver Sand project, is anticipated to facilitate progress towards ratification and approval of the MPC. For COMIBOL to obtain mining rights over such areas, AJAM will have to grant them by way of AMCs or Exploration Licenses in accordance

 

amcconsultants.com48

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

with Bolivian mining laws. In addition, the MPC must be ratified by the Congress of Bolivia (Congress) to be valid and enforceable.

 

Once the MPC has been ratified by Congress, the MPC with COMIBOL will be valid for 15 years which may be automatically renewed for an additional 15-year term and potentially, subject to submission of an acceptable work plan, for an additional 15-year term for a total of 45 years. According to the terms of the MPC, the Company has a minimum investment commitment of $6 million (M) during the first four years of exploration. The Company will pay COMIBOL a 6% gross sales value of the ore processed from the mining areas covered by the MPC when they are commercially exploited at a future date.

 

As of the date of this Technical Report, the MPC has not been ratified nor approved by the Plurinational Legislative Assembly of Bolivia. The Company cautions that there is no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining ratification of the MPC in a timely manner or at all, or that the ratification of the MPC will be obtained on reasonable terms.

 

4.4Environmental permits

 

New Pacific has successfully obtained environment permits from local authorities to conduct mineral exploration and drilling activities in the mineral concessions fully owned by the Company.

 

The Company is progressing with community engagement and securing surface rights for its project in Bolivia, but faces disruptions from illegal artisanal and small-scale miners (“ASMs”) whose activities conflict with project development. Legal proceedings and government support are underway to resolve the issue, with the Company optimistic about a favorable outcome that aligns with community and governmental interests. Regarding the extent of the impact of the illegal ASM activities on the Project’s Mineral Resources, the Company believes the mineralized material extracted is not significant.

 

In order to obtain the environmental license to start the development and operation of the Project, on 25 May 2023, the Ministry of Environment and Water categorized the Project as Category 1, meaning the Company must present a Comprehensive Analytical Environmental Impact Assessment Study (EEIA-AI) in a period of 12 months from the date of Categorization, which includes a Public Consultation with local communities. On 7 June 2024, the company received a six-month extension, for the presentation of the EEIA-IA, valid until the 25 November 2024. The Company is working on environmental and social baseline studies to prepare for the public consultation. If the company does not submit the EEIA-IA by 25 November 2024, then it must reapply for a new Categorization.

 

4.5Land holding costs

 

AJAM employs a special tax unit (STU), that is indexed to the “Unidad de Fomento a la Vivienda”, to calculate the annual fee (“patente”) which holders of mining areas must pay to the government. In 2024, each STU was equivalent to 2.51 Bolivianos and depending on the type and size of mineral concessions, the number of STUs varies between 404 and 746 STUs per Cuadricula. Note that the STU increases slightly each year.

 

Table 4.2 below provides details of fees paid to the government in 2024. For the mining areas covered by the MPC with COMIBOL, the Company does not have to pay any fees to the government as they are nationalized concessions. According to the terms of MPC, the Company will have to pay the annual fees to the government when COMIBOL is granted mineral concessions by AJAM. In addition, the Company will pay COMIBOL a management fee of $10,000 per month for all the concessions covered by the MPC upon ratification during the exploration phase, for a total amount of $240,000.

 

amcconsultants.com49

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 4.2 Fees paid to government in 2024

 

Concessions Title holder Fees (BOB)
Arena de plata Minera Alcira Sociedad Anonima “Alcira” S.A. 12,586
Bronce Empresa El Cateador SRL 1,988
Jisasjardan Empresa Jisas – Jardan SRL 6,958
Total BOB   21,532
Equivalent to US$   3,093

 

Notes: The fees are in local currency, Bolivian Boliviano (BOB).

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2024.

 

4.6Surface rights

 

As per the 2014 Mining Law, holders of mining rights may obtain surface rights (i) through administrative agreements entered into with AJAM. In addition, surface rights may be obtained on third-party contract areas and by neighbouring properties by the following means:

 

i.Agreement between parties;
ii.Payment of compensation; and
iii.Compliance with the regulations and procedures for authorization.

 

Once surface rights are obtained, holders of mining rights may build treatment plants, dams and tailings, infrastructure, and other infrastructure necessary to carry out mining activities. New Pacific has not yet obtained surface land rights.

 

4.7Royalties and encumbrances

 

For the MPC, if commercial production commences, “COMIBOL will receive six percent (6%) of the gross sales value of the minerals obtained from the mining activities”.

 

AMCs are subject to the following royalties and duties:

 

·Mining royalty: The royalty is applicable to all mining actors and applies to the exploitation, concentration and / or commercialization of mineral and metals non-renewable resources at the time of their internal sale or export pursuant to the 2014 Mining Law. The royalty is established according to the status of the mineral (raw, refined, etc.), on whether the mineral will be exported, and international mineral prices. The royalty applicable to silver pre- concentrates, concentrates, complexes, precipitates, bullion or molten bar and refined ingot is as shown in Table 4.3.

 

Table 4.3 Royalty applicable to silver in the AMC

 

Official silver price per troy ounce ($) %
Greater than $8.00 6
From $4.00 to $8.00 0.75 * official silver price
Less than $4.00 3

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2024.

 

·Mining Patent: This is a requirement for the mining operator to continue holding mining rights over the mining area. Patents are calculated according to the size of the area under the exploration license or contract, as set out in the 2014 Mining Law. Failure to pay for the patents will trigger the loss of the underlying exploration or mining rights.

 

amcconsultants.com50

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

With the exception of political risk discussed in Section 14.1 and the need for final execution of some land agreements, AMC Consultants is not aware of other significant factors and risks that may affect access, title, or right to perform work on the Property.

 

amcconsultants.com51

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

5Accessibility, climate, local resources, infrastructure, and physiography

 

5.1Accessibility

 

The Property is located approximately 36 km north-east of the Cerro Rico de Potosí silver and base metal mine, 46 km south-west of the city of Sucre, and 33 km north-west of city of Potosí. The Property is accessed from Sucre and Potosí by travelling along a paved highway to the community of Don Diego, and then north from Don Diego along a 27 km, maintained, all-weather gravel road. The gravel road is being upgraded to paved road by Bolivian Government. Don Diego is accessed by driving 129 km to south-west from Sucre, or 29 km to the north-east from Potosí along paved Highway 5. Key roads and locations are shown in Table 4.1.

 

Sucre has a population of 296,305 (worldpopulationreview.com) and is the constitutional capital of Bolivia and the capital city of Chuquisaca department (a department is the largest administrative division in Bolivia). Potosí has a population of 236,070 (worldpopulationreview.com) and is the capital city of Potosí department. Sucre is connected to major Bolivian cities and beyond by highways and commercial air flights. From Potosí, the Pan American highway provides access to La Paz, the capital city of Bolivia. Chilean port cities of Arica and Iquique can be accessed from Potosí via all-weather roads.

 

Figure 5.1 shows the administrative location of and transportation access to the Property.

 

Figure 5.1 Administrative location and transportation access of Silver Sand Property

 

 

Source: Provided by New Pacific 2019 adapted from Geology.com.

 

amcconsultants.com52

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

5.2Physiography

 

Bolivia is divided into five north-west-trending physiographic zones as shown in Figure 5.2. These include, from west to east; the Western Cordillera (or Cordillera Occidental), the Altiplano, the Eastern Cordillera (or Cordillera Oriental), the Sub-Andean, and the Amazon Basin to the east.

 

Figure 5.2Physiographic zones of Bolivia

 

 

Notes: Amazon Basin = green, Sub-Andean = red, Eastern Cordillera = white, Altiplano = gray, Western Cordillera = white. Red outlines represent country borders.

Source: New Pacific, 2019 - Adapted from Wikipedia: Geography of Bolivia.

 

The Property is situated approximately within the central section of the Eastern Cordillera zone and consists of rolling hills with elevation ranging from 3,900 to 4,100 masl.

 

amcconsultants.com53

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

5.3Climate and vegetation

 

Due to the high elevation, the Property area has a cold, semi-arid desert climate despite the region’s location approximately 19 degrees south of the equator. Vegetation on the Property is poorly developed and mainly consists of sparsely scattered low grasses and shrubs. In valleys below 4,000 m elevation, some eucalyptus trees are grown. Animals such as alpacas, llamas, vicunas, and guanacos are common in the Cordillera Oriental and the local peoples herd llamas and alpacas for food and wool.

 

Figure 5.3 shows a climate map of Bolivia and Figure 5.4 shows a vegetation map of Bolivia.

 

Figure 5.3 Climate map of Bolivia

 

 

Source: World Köppen Classification. Enhanced, modified, and vectorized by Ali Zifan, 20 February 2016.

 

amcconsultants.com54

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 5.4 Vegetation map of Bolivia

 

 

Source: U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, 1971.

 

Temperatures on the Property are relatively constant year-round with daily maximums between 14.8°Celsius (C) and 20.5°C. Minimum temperatures range between -5.6°C and 5.1°C. Minimum temperatures are typically below freezing between May and September.

 

The region experiences a rainy season in the warmer summer months from December to ~mid-April which contributes approximately 80% of the average annual precipitation of 393 millimetres (mm). The driest period is from May to August with very little precipitation.

 

None of these climate factors preclude operations from being conducted on a year-round basis.

 

Table 5.1 shows the annual weather averages in the Potosí area.

 

Table 5.1  Annual weather averages in Potosí area

 

  Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Avg. temperature (°C) 10.6 10.9 10.6 8.4 8 4.6 5.4 6.6 8.5 11 12.4 11.9
Min. temperature (°C) 4.1 4.6 4.1 0.3 -1.2 -5.6 -4.6 -3.1 -0.6 2 4.3 5.1
Max. temperature (°C) 17.2 17.2 17.2 16.5 17.2 14.8 15.5 16.4 17.6 20.1 20.5 18.7
Precipitation (mm) 102 79 50 13 3 2 0 3 9 21 34 77

 

Source: Data adapted from www.climate-data.org.

 

amcconsultants.com55

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

5.4Local resources and infrastructure

 

Intensive mining for silver, tin, lead, and zinc has occurred in various locations around the city of Potosí ever since the discovery of the large silver deposit Cerro Rico de Potosí (the Rich Hill) in 1545. As a result, many residents of Potosí are employed in mines or mining-related businesses, providing a potential source of workers and services that may be needed at the Property.

 

A high voltage power line services the adjacent Canutillos mine to the west, and the Colavi mine north-west of the Property. Both Canutillos and Colavi mines are adjacent to the Silver Sand Property boundary and are discussed in Section 18.

 

Water has not been a concern at the Property, though the greater Potosí area has experienced a drought in recent years. Water for domestic use can be obtained from a small lake, approximately 3.5 km north-west of the Property. Water for drilling can be sourced from nearby drainages. The previous owner, Ningde Jungie Mining Industry Co. Ltd. (NJ Mining) recorded groundwater at the Property. New Pacific have carried out some hydrological and hydrogeological work conceptual nature in 2022, and three piezometers were installed in October 2022. Desktop hydrological and hydrogeological work has been conducted in 2023 and 2024 to support the PFS. Additional work is required to determine whether there is sufficient water present to supply future production scenarios.

 

There is currently no infrastructure on site. The core processing facility is located at Betanzos, a town situated at a lower elevation where the project office is also located. Betanzos is approximately a 1.5-hour drive to the south of the Property.

 

Potential tailings storage and waste disposal areas, and potential processing plant sites are discussed in Section 18.

 

amcconsultants.com56

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

6History

 

Modern exploration on the Property commenced in 2009. The project history has been compiled from Birak (2017), Redwood (2018), Sugaki et al. (1983), and New Pacific (2017).

 

6.1Property ownership

 

In 2009, NJ Mining purchased Alcira, owner of the Silver Sand project, from Empresa Minera Tirex Ltda, a private Bolivia mining company. New Pacific entered into an agreement to acquire Alcira from NJ Mining, pursuant to the terms announced on 10 April 2017. The acquisition was finalized on the 20 July 2017.

 

New Pacific subsequently acquired 100% of the interests of a local private company who owns the mineral rights of two additional concessions (Jisas and Jardan) in July 2018. No exploration work was completed on the two concessions.

 

In December 2019, New Pacific acquired 100% of the interests of Empresa El Cateador SRL, a local private company which owns the mineral rights to a single ATE (El Bronce) located to the north of the Property. No exploration work was ever completed on this concession.

 

In January 2022, an updated MPC was signed between New Pacific’s subsidiary Alcira and COMIBOL securing access to an additional 55 km2 of prospective property surrounding the original Silver Sand concessions.

 

6.2Mining

 

Mining activity has been carried out on the Silver Sand Property and adjacent areas by various operators intermittently since the early 16th century. There are widespread small mine workings and numerous abandoned miners’ villages on the Property. Machacamarca, a historic silver mine on the Property, was mined from colonial times until the price declined in about 1890. Since then, local mining activities have focused on tin mineralization at the adjacent Colavi and Canutillos mines.

 

Historical mining activities on the Property mainly targeted high-grade vein structures.

 

Records of historical mine production are not available.

 

6.3Exploration

 

Despite the long history of mining on the Silver Sand Property and its adjacent areas, there has been little modern systematic exploration work recorded prior to 2009. The only documented exploration campaign was completed by NJ Mining between 2009 and 2015.

 

NJ Mining carried out a comprehensive exploration program across the Property. Exploration work comprised geological mapping, surface and underground sampling, trenching, and drilling as shown in Table 6.1. All exploration samples were analyzed at NJ Mining’s laboratory facilities near Potosí, Bolivia for silver and, in some cases, tin.

 

amcconsultants.com57

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 6.1 Exploration work completed by NJ Mining from 2009 to 2015

 

Type of exploration Work completed
1:5,000 geological mapping 3.15 km2
1:1,000 geological traverse surveying 7,272 m in 15 NE-SW exploration lines
Topographic survey Eight survey points
Mapping historic workings 208 m
Diamond core drilling and logging 2,334 m in 8 holes
Trenching 40 m
Reconnaissance mapping 292 points
Reconnaissance sampling 1,202 samples
Mineralogy and lithology identification 19 thin sections
Petrography study Nine thin sections
Channel sampling 1,628 m with 546 samples
Core sampling 504 samples
Specific gravity measurement 31 samples
QA/QC 215 samples

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2022.

 

Six silicified mineralization zones (Zones I, II, III, IV, IX, and X) were defined from results of the exploration program. This mineralization was defined over an area 1,500 m in length and up to 125 m in width as shown in Figure 6.1.

 

amcconsultants.com58

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 6.1 Mineralization zones defined in previous exploration programs

 

Source: New Pacific, 2019 adapted from Birak, 2017.

 

amcconsultants.com59

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

6.3.1Surface and underground channel sampling

 

NJ Mining collected channel samples from both surface outcrop and abandoned underground workings. Surface channel samples were completed along 100 m spaced, south-west trending exploration lines (sections). They were designed to target north-west trending mineralization zones. Surface and underground samples were collected between Lines 76 and 50 over a strike length of 1,300 m Section lines are shown in Figure 6.1.

 

Both surface and underground channel samples were taken from a 10 centimetre (cm) wide, 2 - 3 cm deep channel cut horizontally into rock with a diamond saw. Individual samples represented 1 to 2.5 m along the channel. An example of sampling channels from Zone 1 is shown in Figure 6.2.

 

Figure 6.2 Historical channel sampling from Zone I, Silver Sand Property

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2019.

 

Significant results from channel sampling are presented in Table 6.2.

 

amcconsultants.com60

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 6.2 Selected result of historical surface channel sampling program

 

Section

number*

Sample

location

Zone

intersected

Interval

(m)

Average silver
grade (g/t)
Number of
samples
50 Surface Zone I 62.7 174 31
54 Surface Zone I 112 127 59
58 Surface Zone I 83 93 44
Underground Zone II 21.4 263 10
62 Surface Zone I 90.7 233 48
Underground Zone I 72.1 207 36
66 Surface Zone I 71.9 145 38
70 Surface Zone I 33.8 131 18
Surface Zone II 6.7 141 4
72 Surface Zone III 16.9 198 9

 

Note: *Locations of exploration lines (sections) are shown in Table 6.2.

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2022.

 

6.3.2Test drilling

 

NJ Mining conducted two test drill programs consisting of a total of eight diamond holes to evaluate the spatial extensions of the mineralization zones defined at the surface. Table 6.3 shows a summary of the 2012 and 2015 drilling programs completed by NJ Mining.

 

Table 6.3 Summary of previous drilling programs

 

 

Year

Drillhole

ID

Collar location (UTM)

Collar elevation

(m)

Length

(m)

Azimuth
(degree)
Dip angle
(degree)
Easting Northing

 

 

2012

ZK5601 234,681.33 7,856,244.63 3,962.40 242 61 -76
ZK6401 234,808.24 7,855,854.01 4,005.90 314.5 64 -73
ZK4002 234,504.00 7,857,063.00 4,092.00 155.3 0 -90
ZK4801 234,708.00 7,856,719.00 4,052.00 64.8 0 -90
Subtotal = 776.6 m

 

 

2015

ZK4601 234,617.28 7,856,785.18 4,094.90 313.1 241 -76
ZK5401 234,824.67 7,856,443.33 4,063.80 413.7 243 -75
ZK5402 234,510.12 7,856,267.07 3,991.10 546.6 0 -90
ZK6601 235,057.10 7,855,869.01 3,926.00 284.3 258 -76
Subtotal = 1,557.7 m
Total = 2,334.3 m

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2022.

 

In 2012, two short, vertical diamond drillholes ZK4002 and ZK4801, targeting the shallow dipping tin mineralization were drilled from the hanging wall of Zone I but did not intersect silver mineralization. Two angled holes ZK5601 and ZK6401 drilled in the same period but in the footwall of Zone I also did not intercept silver mineralization.

 

Four holes were drilled in 2015. Three angled holes ZK4601, ZK5401, and ZK6601 drilled from the hanging wall of Zone I mineralization intersected significant silver mineralization. One vertical hole ZK5402 collared in the footwall missed the silver mineralization zones. The mineralization intersections from the three historical drillholes are listed in Table 6.4.

 

amcconsultants.com61

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 6.4 Results of historical drill intersections

 

Hole

number

Section

number

Average sample

length (m)

Mineralized interval
From (m) To (m) Length (m) Ag (g/t)

 

 

 

ZK4601

 

 

 

46

1.28 83.3 85.6 2.3 60
  122 277.2 155.2 179
Incl. 122 145.4 23.4 261
Incl. 170.9 231.3 60.4 266
Incl. 258.6 277.2 18.6 290

 

 

 

ZK5401

 

 

 

54

1.27 151.1 346.4 195.3 168
Incl. 151.1 177.9 26.8 302
Incl. 195.2 249.5 54.3 303
Incl. 304 321.7 17.7 284
Incl. 336.4 346.4 10 321

 

 

ZK6601

 

 

66

1.33 51.9 243.2 191.3 246
Incl. 51.9 108.1 56.2 329
Incl. 132.1 182.6 50.5 316
Incl. 200.3 243.2 42.9 283

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2022.

 

6.4Historical Resource and Reserve estimate

 

There are no known historical estimates of Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves at the Property.

 

6.5Production

 

There has been no documented production from the Property.

 

amcconsultants.com62

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

7Geological setting and mineralization

 

7.1Regional geology and metallogeny

 

7.1.1Geotectonic framework of Bolivia

 

The regional geological and tectonic framework of Bolivia can be divided into six geotectonic belts. From east to west these comprise: the Precambrian Shield, the Chaco-Beni Plains, the Subandean Zone, the Eastern Cordillera, the Altiplano, and the Western Cordillera. These are shown in Figure 7.1.

 

Four of these geotectonic belts form part of the Central Andes and are discussed in more detail below.

 

Figure 7.1 Bolivian geotectonic framework

 

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2019. Adapted from Arce-Burgoa and Goldfarb, 2009.

 

amcconsultants.com63

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

7.1.2Geology of Central Andes

 

The Bolivian Central Andes comprise the four western geotectonic belts (Arce-Burgoa and Goldfarb, 2009). These belts were configured by the Mesozoic-Cenozoic orogeny as a result of persistent compressive deformation from the subduction of the oceanic Nazca plate beneath the South American plate since the Cretaceous period. The geology of these major belts is described herein from east to west.

 

7.1.2.1Subandean Belt

 

The Subandean Belt is a series of north- and north-west-trending mountain ranges with elevations ranging from 500 to 2,000 masl. The bedrock of the Subandean belt consists of Paleozoic marine siliciclastic sedimentary rocks and Mesozoic and Tertiary continental sedimentary rocks.

 

7.1.2.2Eastern Cordillera Belt

 

The Eastern Cordillera (Cordillera Oriental) comprises a series of mountain chains that attain elevations over 4,000 masl. The bedrock of the Eastern Cordillera is comprised of up to 10 km thick, intensively deformed sequences of Paleozoic marine clastic sedimentary rocks and thinner (<3 km), less-deformed Cretaceous and Cenozoic continental sedimentary rock sequences. Granodiorite and adamellite (quartz monzonite) plutonic rocks occur as batholiths and laccoliths in the northern part of the Eastern Cordillera. Permian to Triassic igneous rocks found in the middle and southern parts of the cordillera are mainly hypabyssal and volcanic rocks occurring as stocks and volcanic necks that intruded the Paleozoic sedimentary sequences. Tertiary andesitic volcanic rocks and related hypabyssal rocks associated with the Andean orogenic movement are seen along the western portion of the Eastern Cordillera.

 

7.1.2.3Altiplano Belt

 

The Altiplano Belt is a 130 km wide series of intermontane, continental basins forming a high plateau at elevations between 3,600 and 4,100 masl (Arce-Burgoa and Goldfarb, 2009). The Altiplano Belt comprises a Proterozoic to Paleozoic basement which is covered by vast volcanic rocks and continental sediments. Miocene-aged andesitic volcanic rocks occur in the southern portion of the belt. Miocene to Pliocene rhyolitic pyroclastic rocks occur in the northern part of the belt. Continental sediments have been deposited from Cretaceous to recent times.

 

7.1.2.4Western Cordillera Belt

 

The Western Cordillera (Cordillera Occidental) is an active volcanic mountain chain consisting of spaced Miocene and Quaternary andesitic volcanoes and small volcanic centers that have erupted through a sequence of Cenozoic and Cretaceous rocks. Volcanic cones rise over 2,000 m above the general land surface, reaching elevations above 6,000 masl (Lamb et al., 1997).

 

The Western Cordillera is extensively covered by Miocene to recent volcanic rocks erupted along the uplifting axis in the north-south direction. Continental sediments lie between the volcanic bodies.

 

7.1.3Regional metallogeny of Central Andes

 

The Bolivian Central Andes is characterized by a diverse series of deposits and metallogenic belts as shown in Figure 7.2. These include the Miocene to Pliocene red-bed copper deposits, epithermal Ag-Au-Pb-Zn-Cu deposits in the Altiplano and Western Cordillera, the Mesozoic and Cenozoic Tin Belt, the Paleozoic gold antimony belt, and the lead-zinc belt in the Eastern Cordillera (Arce-Burgoa and Goldfarb, 2009).

 

amcconsultants.com64

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 7.2 Bolivian metallogenic belts

 

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022. Adapted from Arce-Burgoa and Goldfarb, 2009.

 

The Bolivian Silver-Tin Belt is a 900 km long, north-west to north-south trending belt containing significant deposits of tin, silver, and tungsten related to orogenic and magmatic processes which occurred between the late Paleozoic and late Tertiary. Pluton related Sb-W mineralization occurs within Triassic-Jurassic and Miocene aged rocks in the northern portion of the belt. Pluton related Sn-W and volcanic rock associated Sn-Ag-Pb-Zn mineralization occur within Miocene to Pliocene aged rocks in the central and southern portion of the belt (Rivas, 1979).

 

Deposits of the tin belt can be divided into four groups (Arce-Burgoa and Goldfarb, 2009):

 

1Porphyry-associated tin deposits.
2Volcanic rock-associated Sn-Ag-Pb-Zn deposits which include bonanza-type Ag and Sn.
3Sedimentary rock-hosted Sn-Ag-Pb-Zn deposits.
4Distinct pluton-related Sn-Au-W-Zn deposits.

 

Groups 2 and 3 are collectively defined as Bolivian polymetallic vein deposits which are mainly located in the southern half of the Bolivian Tin Belt (Arce-Burgoa and Goldfarb, 2009).

 

Bolivian polymetallic vein-type ore deposits are genetically related to Miocene and Pliocene subvolcanic intrusions. Mineralization occurs as veins, veinlet, stockwork, and disseminated ores hosted in Paleozoic and Mesozoic sedimentary rocks, Cenozoic volcanic rocks, and Paleozoic to Mesozoic plutons. The shallower erosion levels in the southern part of the belt results in the partial preservation of the upper silver-rich parts of deposits.

 

amcconsultants.com65

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Two world-class silver and tin deposits, the Cerro Rico de Potosí deposit, considered to be the largest silver deposit in the world, and the Llallagua deposit, considered to be the largest vein-type tin deposit discovered to date, both belong to the Bolivian polymetallic vein type. The Silver Sand Property is located about 35 km north-east of the Cerro Rico de Potosí deposit and 150 km south-east of the Llallagua deposit within the same tin metallogenic belt. Figure 7.3 shows the major deposits in the Bolivian Tin Belt.

 

Figure 7.3 Major deposits in the Bolivian Tin Belt

 

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022. Adapted from Dietrich et al., 2000.

 

7.2Geological setting and mineralization

 

7.2.1Property geology

 

The Property is located in the polymetallic tin belt in the Eastern Cordillera. Evidence of historical mining activities such as abandoned mining adits and mining villages can be seen across the Property. The oldest rocks observed within the Property comprise Ordovician to Silurian marine, clastic sediments which have been intensely folded and faulted.

 

amcconsultants.com66

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The Paleozoic basement is unconformably overlain by weakly deformed, lower Cretaceous continental sandstone, siltstone, and mudstone. These Mesozoic rocks form an open syncline that plunges gently to NNW and is bound to the SW and NE by NW trending faults. The unconformity between Mesozoic rocks and deformed Paleozoic basement is observed in the south-east part of the Property as shown in Figure 7.4. This is a panoramic view looking to the SW showing the unconformity contact between Paleozoic and Cretaceous Sedimentary Sequences at El Fuerte.

 

Figure 7.4 Unconformity and thrust fault contact

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2019.

 

There is a thrust fault observed on the east side of the Property, north of the Snake Hole prospect (shown on Figure 7.5), which faults Palaeozoic rocks over the Cretaceous sandstone.

 

amcconsultants.com67

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 7.5 Thrust Fault north of Snake Hole

 

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2019.

 

The Cretaceous sedimentary sequence within the Property is divided into the lower La Puerta Formation and the upper Tarapaya Formation.

 

The La Puerta Formation consists of a sequence of mixed aeolian and fluvial sandstones exhibiting distinct massive, bedded, cross-bedded, and bioturbated “streaky” units which unconformably overlies the Paleozoic basement. The Tarapaya Formation conformably overlies the La Puerta sandstones in the central part of the Property and comprises red siltstones and mudstones intercalated with minor sandstone.

 

Several Miocene aged subvolcanic porphyritic dacite intrusions occur within Cretaceous and Paleozoic sequences. A porphyritic dacite laccolith is exposed overlying the Cretaceous Tarapaya siltstones at the landmark San Cristobal Hill at Mascota located in the approximate centre of the Property. This laccolith is similar to that hosting polymetallic systems in the southern tin belt. Porphyritic dacite dikes are also exposed in mine workings along the eastern Cretaceous Paleozoic thrust contact. Elongate stocks up to 5 km in length are recorded to the east of the Cretaceous sequence within Paleozoic basement.

 

A number of andesitic breccias with phreatic, crackle, and other breccia textures are recorded at the Property. A large, oval body of andesitic diatreme breccia cross cutting La Puerta Formation sandstone is seen in outcrop close to the west side of the major Silver Sand mineralization zone in the southern portion of the Property. Geological mapping has defined this zone over an area of approximately 300 m in length and 200 m in width along an NNE orientation. A separate ENE-striking sub-vertical diatreme breccia dike of about 13 m in width is seen in outcrop at Aullagas, central to the Property and about 500 m west of the diatreme outcrop. This unit has welded tuff and sandstone clasts and is cemented by abundant limonite.

 

The general geology of the Property is presented in Figure 7.6.

 

amcconsultants.com68

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 7.6 General geology of Silver Sand Property

 

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.com69

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The stratigraphic column for the Silver Sand Property is presented in Figure 7.7.

 

Figure 7.7 Stratigraphic column for the Property

 

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.com70

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

7.2.2Structural control

 

The Property exhibits a variety of geometries and morphology of the mineralized bodies which are controlled and hosted by local transfer faults. Some are evident in outcrops, but the best examples are observed in drill cores (Warren & Francis-Smith, 2018) and in underground workings. Mineralized structures usually appear as steps-overs developed between two neighboring fault / vein segments that exhibit an echelon arrangement and may or may not be connected by lower-ranking faults / vein. These types of structures are of fractal type, which implies that they repeat their geometry, regardless of the observation scale, in arrangements of sigmoid (jogs), echelon, subparallel stepped, relay, horsetails, and extensional nets (swarms). Line drawings of these features are shown in Figure 7.8.

 

Figure 7.8 Transfer zones linked to mineralization at Silver Sand

 

 

Notes: a) release curvature, b) in relay, c) mineral filled jog, d) swarm, e) echelon,

f) jog with brecciated texture, g) faults parallel to bedding, h) comb style.

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

Detailed geological and structural mapping of surface and accessible underground mining workings has been carried out in the Silver Sand deposit. by the project geology team of Silver Sand from 2018 to 2022. A total of 545 structural measurements including main foliations and tectonic lineations were collected. In addition, other structural data including strike and dip measurements were collected from oriented drillholes. Based on structural style (thrust assemblages) and geometric characteristics (listric faults and conjugate steeply dipping faults), the area has been divided into two blocks, North and South Block, as shown in the location map in Figure 7.9.

 

amcconsultants.com71

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 7.9 Location of North and South Block

 

 

Notes: Machacamarca is a silver mine.

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

7.2.2.1North Block

 

This block covers an area of approximately 0.6 km2 (0.69 x 0.86 km), characterized by thrust-type pre-mineralization structures and listric faults. Penetrative conjugate fault systems in X (crossing) and Y (abutting) are superimposed on these structures and are the main hosts of mineralization, with preferential attitudes of mineralized structures N12°W/77°SW (major) and N12°W/80°NE (minor).

 

7.2.2.2South Block

 

This block covers an area of approximately 0.15 km2 (0.30 x 0.5 km), where the first order structure is constituted by the Machacamarca syncline, a cap of the Tarapaya formation (up to 30 m) and a system of penetrative conjugate fault system in X and Y being the main host of mineralization, with preferential attitudes of N20°W/74°SW (major) and N20°W/74°NE (minor).

 

amcconsultants.com72

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

7.2.3Mineralization

 

A total of eleven mineralized prospects have been identified across the Property to date. These include the Silver Sand deposit and the El Fuerte, San Antonio, Aullagas, Snake Hole, Mascota, Esperanza, North Plain, Jisas, Jardan, El Bronce, occurrences. Silver Sand, Snake Hole, Jisas, and El Bronce have been tested by drilling. The other nine prospects were defined by rock chip and grab sampling of ancient and recent artisanal mine workings and dumps. Exploration results from surface outcrops and underground workings defined a silver mineralized belt 7.5 km long and 2 km wide.

 

Table 7.1 summarizes the style of mineralization for each mineral occurrence. Each style is described in more detail in the sections below.

 

Table 7.1 Mineral occurrences and styles of mineralization

 

Style of mineralization Mineral occurrence
Sandstone-hosted silver Silver Sand, El Fuerte, San Antonio, Snake Hole, Esperanza, North Plain, and Jisas
Porphyritic dacite-hosted silver Mascota, El Bronce
Diatreme breccia- hosted silver Aullagas
Manto-type tin mineralization Tarapaya siltstone and mudstone covered areas, such as Canutillos and North Plain

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2022.

 

7.2.3.1Sandstone-hosted silver mineralization

 

The mineralization in the Silver Sand project comprises silver-containing sulphosalts and sulphides occurring within sheeted veins, stockworks, veinlets, breccia infill, and disseminated within host rocks. The most common silver-bearing minerals include freibergite [(Ag,Cu,Fe)12(Sb,As)4S13], miargyrite [AgSbS2], polybasite [(Ag,Cu)6(Sb,As)2S7] [Ag9CuS4], bournonite [PbCuSbS3] (some lattices of copper may be replaced by silver), andorite [PbAgSb3S6], and boulangerite [Pb5Sb4S11] (some lattices of lead may be replaced by silver). Most silver mineralization is hosted in La Puerta sandstone units with minor amounts in porphyritic dacite diatreme breccia.

 

The silver mineralization is the majority of mineralization occurring almost exclusively within the Cretaceous-aged red quartz sandstones of La Puerta formation, which demonstrate extensive sericitic alteration (bleaching). This style of mineralization is usually structurally controlled. The intensity of mineralization is dependent on the density of various mineralized vein structures developed in the brittle host rocks.

 

Sandstone-hosted silver mineralization is recognized at the core area of Silver Sand deposit and in all regional prospects. Figure 7.10 shows examples of silver mineralization associated to Cretaceous sandstone from drill core.

 

amcconsultants.com73

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 7.10 Silver mineralization in drill cores

 

 

Note: DSS565001 Sulphides and sulfosalts crackle breccia @ 141 m (265 g/t Ag, 0.28% Pb, 1.51% Zn).

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2019.

 

 

Note: DSS665001 Sulphides and sulfosalts crackle breccia @ 125.81 m (1,290 g/t Ag, 0.92% Pb, 4.05% Zn).

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2019.

 

amcconsultants.com74

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

 

Note: DSS5803 Sulphides and sulfosalts veinlets @ 188.20 m (205 g/t Ag).

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2019.

 

 

Note: DSS525001 Oxidized crackle breccia @ 65.30 m (892 g/t Ag).

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2019.

 

The exploration drill program confirmed the characteristics of the Silver Sand deposit. The mineralization has been traced for more than 2,000 m along strike, to a maximum width of about 680 m and a dip extension of more than 250 m. Figure 7.11 is a cross section through the central portion of the deposit illustrating the extension of mineralization across strike and downdip.

 

Other regional mineralization occurrences hosted in sandstone units have been defined by chip sampling of mineralized outcrops and grab sampling of mining dumps. The Snake Hole, El Fuerte, and Jisas mineralization have been traced along a strike length of more than 1,000 m. This strike length is defined by the distribution of old mine working and sampling results of surface outcrops and underground workings.

 

amcconsultants.com75

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 7.11 Cross Section 5250, Silver Sand Zone

 

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

7.2.3.2Porphyritic dacite-hosted silver mineralization

 

Silver mineralization within porphyritic dacite is observed at the Mascota and El Bronce prospects. These occurrences experienced extensive artisanal mining activities.

 

Moderate to strong alteration and well-developed stockwork are seen at the outcrops and in cores. Systematic grab sampling on mining dumps has returned silver grade from 50 to 500 grams per tonne (g/t) Ag. The El Bronce zone has been traced with grab sampling results for more than 1,000 m along strike. The zone is defined by silver assays > 50 parts per million (ppm). In the Jardan area north of Jisas, tin mining is also conducted along north-east-trending veins in porphyritic intrusions at Chiaraque.

 

Drilling at El Bronce prospect intersected porphyritic dacite intervals with moderate oxidation (limonite-jarosite), weak to moderate sericitic alteration, and argillization patches. Moderate to strong pyrite dissemination with stringers of pyrite, unknown fine sulphides, and minor amount of chalcopyrite, sphalerite, boulangerite, and brecciated intervals of limonite and jarosite in oxidized zones also occur.

 

amcconsultants.com76

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 7.12 Crackle breccia intervals in altered porphyritic dacite

 

 

Note: DSSJS1701 Porphyritic Dacite with oxidized crackle breccia @ 11.10 m (XRF 889 g/t Ag, Assay pending).

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

7.2.3.3Diatreme breccia-hosted silver mineralization

 

Diatreme breccia hosted silver mineralization is observed in the Aullagas zone. Based on surface mapping, the Aullagas zone occurs within a north-east-trending dike-like breccia body of about 40 m in length and 13 m width, hosted by bleached sandstone. Breccia fragments consist of ignimbrite and sandstone clasts cemented with highly ferruginous material. Surface grab samples have returned silver grades from 50 to 298 g/t Ag. Further investigation is needed to define the size and potential of the diatreme breccia.

 

Figure 7.13 Diatreme breccia outcrop in Aullagas zone

 

Note: Aullagas prospect diatreme breccia strongly oxidated. Grab Sample 293 g/t Ag.

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.com77

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

7.2.3.4Manto-type tin mineralization

 

Manto-type tin mineralization on the Property occurs as metasomatic replacement of the calcareous horizons in the siltstone and mudstone at the base of the Tarapaya Formation. Very fine-grained cassiterite is accompanied by abundant pyrite and lesser ankerite, siderite, and barite in the stratiform manto.

 

Historically, and as early as 1890, artisanal mining of the manto-type tin mineralization occurred at the contact between the La Puerta sandstone and the Tarapaya siltstone and mudstone on the Property. Some drillholes in the current exploration drilling program intersected the tin manto-type mineralization horizon in the contact of Tarapaya siltstone with La Puerta Formation nodular sandstone unit.

 

Figure 7.14 Example of tin mineralization associated contact Tarapaya with Cretaceous sandstone

 

Note: Hole DSS5803 Showing mantle type tin mineralization in contact Tarapaya formation with La Puerta Formation Sandstone.

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

7.2.4Relative timing of hydrothermal alteration and mineralization

 

At the Silver Sand deposit magmatic and hydrothermal processes are proposed to have occurred as two separate events within a single metallogenic epoch associated with the most recent orogenic event within the Eastern Cordillera. The initial event comprised an early stage of alteration and mineralization associated with a deep heat and fluid source (intrusion) within a mesothermal environment. This was followed by uplift and erosion of the Eastern Cordillera during Cenozoic orogenic events, and epithermal style mineralization.

 

The initial phase of metasomatic activity resulted in manto-type tin mineralization of selected calcareous horizons within the Tarapaya siltstone and mudstone package. The manto-type mineralization comprised high-temperature minerals indicative of a mesothermal environment including cassiterite, pyrite, magnetite, ankerite, siderite, and barite.

 

The underlying La Puerta sandstone was also intensely altered during this event. Metasomatic fluids resulted in the leaching of ferruginous cement from the sandstone, pervasive sericitization and silicification and introduction of pyrite veinlets and disseminated pyrite and sphalerite. Collectively, this alteration changed the rheological properties of the La Puerta sandstone units providing structural preparation for subsequent metasomatic events.

 

Progressive uplifting and erosion of the Eastern Cordillera during the Cenozoic orogenic events resulted in a transition to an epithermal environment. Hydrothermal activities during this time led to extensive fracturing, hydrothermal brecciation, and reactivation of earlier structures in the brittle

 

amcconsultants.com78

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

sandstone and porphyritic intrusions and deposition of silver sulphides and sulphosalts. North-west trending fractures and faults with moderate to high-angle dips are thought to have acted as conduits for mineralizing fluids. This mineralization was superimposed on rocks altered during the initial hydrothermal event.

 

This hypothesis is supported by Rivas (1979) who noted the porphyritic dacite dikes displace manto-style mineralization at the Colavi mine. At the Silver Sand deposit, veins of silver sulphides and sulphosalts crosscut earlier pyrite veinlets, and pyrite in druses are coated with later silver minerals. Silver mineralization zones are spatially associated with porphyritic dacite intrusions but are formed at a later stage than the intrusion. The abundance of low-temperature silver sulphosalts in silver veins and the widespread mineralized hydrothermal and structural breccia suggest an epithermal environment.

 

7.2.5Oxidation

 

Mineralized zones on the Property have been oxidized to a vertical depth of more than 250 m in places. The base of oxidation is commonly irregular resulting in significant mixed oxide and sulphide zones (transition zones) due to the strong local influence of fractures.

 

Oxide minerals are dominated by limonite, jarosite, goethite, and minor hematite resulting pervasive staining within sandstones, and pseudomorphic of sulphide minerals within fractures, breccias, veinlets and veins.

 

Figure 7.15 shows an example of oxidized mineralization grading into transition Material.

 

Figure 7.15 Oxidation material in core

 

Note: Hole DSS525001 Oxidation interval (Limonite, jarosite), showing silver grades.

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.com79

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 7.16 shows an example of transition mineralization intervals where oxidation is developed along fractures.

 

Figure 7.16 Transition material in core

 

Note: DSS529001 Transition interval (oxide and sulphides), showing silver grades.

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.com80

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

8Deposit types

 

Silver and base metal mineralization in the Silver Sand Property was formed during the regional uplifting and erosion process associated with the Tertiary orogenic events in the Eastern Cordillera. The genetic model of silver and tin mineralization in the Property is a magmatic-hydrothermal system related to a deep-seated magmatic center. The ore-forming processes in the Property are outlined as follows:

 

1Tin-bearing hydrothermal solutions derived from the magmatic center moved upwards through major faults cutting through the Paleozoic and Mesozoic sedimentary sequences in a mesothermal environment at the early stage of orogeny.
2The ductile and impermeable red siltstone and mudstone of the Tarapaya Formation overlying the porous and permeable La Puerta sandstone acted as a barrier to the upward movement of the high-temperature tin-bearing hydrothermal solutions. This early hydrothermal activity resulted in the extensive sericitic alteration (bleaching) the La Puerta sandstone and the formation of the stratiform metasomatic replacement (manto-type) tin and base metal mineralization at the base of the Tarapaya siltstone and mudstone.
3With persistent uplifting and erosion, the hydrothermal system evolved into an epithermal environment and subvolcanic activities developed in the Property area. Porphyritic dacite rocks intruded Paleozoic and Mesozoic sedimentary sequences and displaced the manto-type mineralization in the Tarapaya siltstone and mudstone. The subvolcanic activities likely caused intensive fracturing, faulting, and brecciation of the previously bleached brittle La Puerta sandstone.
4Following the dacitic porphyry intrusions, silver-rich, and tin-bearing hydrothermal fluid migrated though faults, fractures, and breccia structures in the La Puerta sandstone and porphyritic dacite intrusions both beneath and above the Tarapaya Formation. This later-stage hydrothermal activity is characterized by typical epithermal features such as hydrothermal brecciation and a low-temperature mineral assemblage.
5The continuous uplifting and erosion of the region has exposed the mineralization and resulted in oxidation of the mineralized zones along deep-seated fractures.

 

The stratiform metasomatic replacement tin mineralization formed in the earlier hydrothermal event is manto-type tin and base metal mineralization which is unique in the Bolivia Tin Belt. The silver and tin mineralization formed in the later hydrothermal event is typical of the Bolivian polymetallic vein-type deposits represented by the giant Cerro Rico de Potosí silver mine. The Bolivian polymetallic vein-type mineralization in the Property includes three subtypes, the sandstone-hosted, the subvolcanic-hosted, and the diatreme breccia-hosted mineralization.

 

A conceptual model of mineralization controls in the Property is established from the above discussion and is shown in a schematic format in Figure 8.1.

 

amcconsultants.com81

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 8.1Conceptual model of mineralization controls at Silver Sand Property

 

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2020.

 

amcconsultants.com82

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

9Exploration

 

9.1Introduction

 

Since the acquisition of the Property by New Pacific in October 2017, exploration work has focused on geological mapping and sampling of surface outcrops, historical mine dumps, and accessible historical underground workings. After an overview of the programs, the results are discussed in Sections 9.2 to 9.4.These samples are not truly representative and are not used in any estimates.

 

Samples collected from outcrop and underground workings were between 1 to 1.5 m long and were taken along sample lines. Representative grab samples were taken from historical mine dumps. A total of 3,625 rock samples were collected at Silver Sand between October 2017 to July 2022 as shown in Table 9.1.

 

Table 9.1 Summary of underground and surface sampling programs

 

Sample type Total samples Comments
Surface samples 1,046 Rock chips from channels, including the Silver Sand project and regional prospects.
Mine dump samples 1,408 Grab samples from historic mine dumps.
Underground samples 1,171 Rock chip samples from channels in 5,780 m of underground development in 65 locations.
Total 3,625  

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

Figure 9.1 shows the distribution of the abandoned artisanal adits and mine dumps across the Property. New Pacific has sampled all mine dumps and accessible adits with silver mineralization showings. Areas mined for tin mineralization over the Tarapaya formation rocks have not been systematically sampled.

 

amcconsultants.com83

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 9.1 Location of historic adits and mine dumps

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.com84

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

9.2Surface chip sampling

 

A total of 1,046 rock chip samples were collected from 35 separate outcrops by New Pacific since 2017. Most of the outcrops sampled were located above or proximal to historical workings. Samples were collected at 1.5 m intervals along sample lines oriented approximately perpendicular to the strike direction of mineralization, for a total length of 2,863 m. An example of surface chip sample locations is shown in Figure 9.2. A panoramic photo of chip sampling being carried out in the Jardan prospect is shown in Figure 9.3.

 

For each sample, the sample type, location, and a description of the lithology, alteration, and mineralization were recorded by New Pacific personnel using Microsoft Excel (Excel) worksheet. Geological and structural mapping was also completed at the same time. Assay data is compiled and stored in the MX Deposit central database as point data. Geological and assay data are then compiled onto a geological plan map.

 

Of the 1,046 samples collected to date, 101 samples (9.6%) returned a grade between 30 and 840 g/t Ag with an average grade of 150 g/t Ag.

 

Figure 9.2 Results from the Jesus adit trench

 

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.com85

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 9.3 Channel sampling at the Jardan Prospect

 

 

Note: Photo looking west showing channel sampling process March 2020 at the Jardan prospect.
Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

9.3Dump sampling

 

Mine dumps from historical mining activities are scattered across a significant portion of the Property. These provide valuable insight into subsurface mineralization and geology.

 

New Pacific collected a total of 1,408 grab samples from historical mine dumps. Most samples collected were remnants of high-grade narrow veins extracted from underground mining activity.

 

Of the 1,408 samples collected to date, 439 samples (31%) returned assay results between 30 and 3,290 g/t Ag with an average grade of 194 g/t Ag.

 

9.4Underground chip sampling

 

The Property encompasses significant historical underground mine workings which date back to the 16th century. A number of adits and tunnels provide access to underground workings from the surface. New Pacific has surveyed all safe and readily accessible tunnels within a 2 km wide and 6 km long area encompassing the mineralized La Puerta sandstone, and porphyritic dacite dykes and intrusions. Mine workings have typically focused on high-grade veins.

 

New Pacific has mapped and sampled 65 historical mine workings comprising 5,780 m of underground tunnels. A total of 1,171 continuous chip samples have been collected at 1 - 2 m intervals along walls of available tunnels that cut across the mineralized zones.

 

Of the 1,171 samples collected to date, 404 samples (34.5%) returned assay results between 30 and 2,710 g/t Ag with an average grade of 205 g/t Ag.

 

amcconsultants.com86

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

New Pacific geological personnel record geological features on both a map and in an Excel worksheet. Assay results are compiled in the MX Deposit central database. A compilation map comprising the surveyed mine workings, geology, and assay data is subsequently collated. An example of underground mapping and sampling is presented in Figure 9.4.

 

Figure 9.4 Underground mapping and sampling at Mascota prospect

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

Table 9.2 provides a summary of the results of underground sampling.

 

amcconsultants.com87

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 9.2 Selected underground sampling results

 

Name of adit Length (m) Sample type

Number

of

samples
Mineralized samples Host rock
Number

Grade

range Ag

(g/t)

Average

grade Ag

(g/t)

Jesus Adit Lower 145 Chips 31 14 31-2,710 371 Sandstone
Jisas Jardan Adit 1 275 Chips 44 19 31-281 109 Sandstone, Porphyry
North Porphyry Adit Lower 385 Chips 45 36 30-1,365 220 Porphyry
North Porphyry Adit Upper 290 Chips 18 15 31-812 244 Porphyry
Silver Sand PD_25 250 Chips 98 26 33-666 114 Sandstone
Silver Sand PD_62 177 Chips 77 24 34-750 179 Sandstone
Snake Hole Principal Adit 1 188 Chips 8 6 85-433 251 Sandstone
Snake Hole Zone Adit 3 82 Chips 4 4 34-495 164 Sandstone
Snake Hole Zone Middle Adit 2 76 Chips 38 22 31-1,460 157 Sandstone
South Adit 1 300 Chips 47 10 34-767 240 Sandstone
South Adit 4 Level 1-4 113 Chips 23 23 38-1,500 583 Sandstone
Esperanza Adit 1 55 Chips 13 8 75-830 337 Sandstone
Esperanza Adit 2 153 Chips 41 19 39-568 150 Sandstone
Esperanza Adit 3 195 Chips 24 10 32-536 234 Sandstone
Esperanza Adit 4 26 Chips 13 6 35-176 103 Sandstone
Esperanza Adit 5 6 Chips 3 3 189-1,300 624 Sandstone
Esperanza Adit 6 34 Chips 17 5 40-148 95 Sandstone
Esperanza Adit 7 14 Chips 7 1 118 118 Sandstone
Esperanza Adit 8 36 Chips 18 5 33-110 61 Sandstone and Porphyry
Esperanza Adit 9 52 Chips 26 0 - - Sandstone
El Bronce Main Adit 1 Upper and Lower 120 Chips 11 7 37-785 331 Porphyry
El Bronce Adit 2 30 Chips 9 7 49-318 108 Porphyry
El Fuerte Adit 2 73 Chips 7 5 86-589 261 Sandstone
El Fuerte Adit 1 100 Chips 12 8 34-214 100 Sandstone

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

9.5Discussion of exploration results

 

Assay results of underground chip samples and surface mine dump grab samples suggest historical mining focused on high-grade veins within the core of the mineralized system and that in-situ mineralized material exists outside of the principal or main veins. This material forms continuous mineralized zones from several metres to several tens of metres in width in bleached sandstone and porphyritic dacite.

 

Results of samples collected to date show comparable average grades between the underground chip samples and the grab samples from historical waste dumps. Surface rock chip sample grades are consistently lower. The significant difference in silver grades between underground and surface chip samples may be the result of oxidation and leaching of silver sulphides and sulphosalts from the host rocks on surface.

 

A summary of results from surface rock chip samples, waste dump samples, and underground chip samples is presented in Table 9.3. Mineralized samples listed in the table below are samples with > 30 g/t silver.

 

amcconsultants.com88

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 9.3 Summary of underground and surface sampling results

 

Sample type

Total
samples
Average Ag
grade of all
samples (g/t)
Number of
mineralized
samples
Grade Ag
range (g/t)
Average Ag grade
of mineralized
samples (g/t)
Surface samples 1,046 18 101 30 - 840 150
Mine dump samples 1,408 94 439 30 – 3,290 194
Underground samples 1,171 76 404 30 – 2,710 205

 

Note: Mineralized samples are samples with > 30 g/t silver.

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

The main regional prospects where mapping has been carried out are described below:

 

Snake Hole: This prospect is located approximately 600 m east of the Silver Sand deposit and consists of artisanal underground workings on structures that trend NNW-SSE. The workings and associated surface mine dumps were started in the Spanish colonial era and have continued sporadically to recent times, creating a “glory hole”. Developed in altered (bleaching) quartz sandstones, the workings are traceable over more than 1,000 m strike length with widths varying from a few metres up to 100 m. Geochemical sampling of the workings and mine dumps returned encouraging results, typically ranging from 100 g/t Ag to 300 g/t Ag.

 

Surface mapping suggests that the mineralized fracture zone remains open to the north, where it potentially trends undercover towards the Jisas prospect located approximately two kilometres to the north.

 

Figure 9.5 Mineralized structures and fractures in historically mined Snake zone glory hole

 

 

 

Notes: Historical mined structures and fractures. Left: Intersection of principal NS. Right: conjugate EW.
Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.com89

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

El Fuerte: This prospect is located south-east of the Silver Sand deposit and covers an area of 0.46 km2. The host rock is the Cretaceous La Puerta Formation with clear signs of alteration seen as bleaching. Multiple old mining works were observed in the area, showing a fracture zone with brecciated intervals and vein stocks with moderate to strong oxidation.

 

The mineralized structures and breccias consist of hematite, limonite, goethite, quartz, jarosite, and pyrolusite. A total of 170 rock samples were taken in the area. Chip sampling includes 114 samples with grades up to 589 g/t Ag. Grab / selected sampling includes 56 samples with grades up to 983 g/t.

 

Figure 9.6 El Fuerte prospect main structure

 

 

Notes: Picture looking to NE. Showing brecciated structure of 1.35 m wide (320°/85°SW).
Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

Aullagas: This prospect is located west of the Silver Sand deposit, covering an area of 0.54 km2. The host rock is also the Cretaceous La Puerta Formation with clear signs of alteration seen as bleaching.

 

The prospect contains two diatreme breccias with a northeast-southwest orientation. Both breccia bodies are subvertical or dipping south at high angles. The northern one has a reddish fine-grained matrix with polymictic subrounded clast from 0.5 to 10 cm. The southern breccia is in the center of the prospect. It has polymictic subrounded to angular clast from 0.2 to 15 cm and some up to size blocks of Anzaldo formation. The limonite and hematite content of the breccia is high.

 

The diatreme breccia bodies present a mineralogical association established by the presence of pyrite-limonite-hematite. Grab and channel sampling results have silver grades from 20 to 293 Ag g/t.

 

amcconsultants.com90

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 9.7 Aullagas prospect outcrop

 

 

Notes: Looking to West. Showing contact between Cretaceous La Puerta Formation and diatreme breccia.
Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

El Bronce: This prospect is located NW of the Silver Sand deposit, covering an area of 0.5 km2. The area has outcrops with porphyritic rhyolitic-dacitic intrusive rocks, and hosts several mineralized zones scattered with widespread historical mine workings and dumps. The mining probably dates back to colonial times. Silver minerals (acanthite-freibergite), zinc (sphalerite), copper (malachite) and some tin minerals were observed.

 

Detailed geological mapping indicates the intrusive host rock is pervasively flooded by moderate to intense alteration. This reflects the passage of silver-rich hydrothermal fluids (phylic alteration (sericite) with local argillic (kaolinite) and propylitic (chlorite-epidote) zones). Surface mapping has also identified good to moderate micro-veining and stockwork development between the principal historically exploited structures thereby forming an attractive bulk tonnage target.

 

Figure 9.8 El Bronce prospect

 

 

Notes: Mine dump sampling at El Bronce, looking south.
Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.com91

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Jisas: The prospect is located north of the Silver Sand deposit, covering an area of 1.25 km2. The host rock is whitish bleached Cretaceous La Puerta Formation sandstone bounded to the east by a regional low angle thrust overlain by strongly folded and faulted Paleozoic clastic sediments of the Anzaldo Formation. The thrust is striking NW, dipping east at a dip of around 30 degrees. Locally, dacitic intrusions are emplaced along the thrust and intrude both Cretaceous sandstone and Paleozoic sediments.

 

Three sets of mineralized fractures were identified from surface outcrops and underground workings. The major set is striking roughly NW direction and dips west at high angles. The other two minor sets strike NW and NE respectively. The mineralized structures are oxidized to various extent near surface, with mineralization characterized by quartz, cassiterite, pyrrhotite, pyrite, siderite, and barite freibergite, andorite, bournonite, blende, chalcopyrite, argentite, and malachite.

 

Figure 9.9 Jisas prospect outcrop photo

 

Notes: Contact between the Anzaldo formation and porphyry dacitic dike. The contact yellow line with direction N65°W/75°NE.

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.com92

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

10Drilling

 

10.1Drilling overview

 

This section describes diamond drill programs completed by New Pacific at the Property between October 2017 to July 2022. Drilling completed by previous operators is discussed in Section 6.

 

In total, New Pacific has completed 564 diamond core drillholes for a total of 139,920 m. Drilling programs were completed in four drill campaigns (Phases). The initial Phase consisted of drilling of the main Silver Sand target area between October 2017 and December 2018. This program was designed to test areas with anomalous surface and underground rock chip results and resulted in the discovery of the main Silver Sand deposit. Ongoing drilling resulted in a nominal 50 x 50 m spaced drill grid over an area of 1,600 m x 800 m at Silver Sand.

 

The second Phase of drilling was completed between April 2019 and December 2019 comprised infill drilling of key portions of the Silver Sand deposit to a nominal 25 x 25 m grid, as well as exploration drilling at the Snake Hole prospect, discussed in Section 10.5.2. In 2020 and 2021 the scheduled drilling programs were interrupted by country wide pandemic lockdown and this Phase spans both years. In 2022 the drilling continued at the Silver Sand deposit and commenced in the North Block prospects (El Bronce and Jisas).

 

Drill statistics by year are presented in Table 10.1.

 

Table 10.1New Pacific drilling by year

 

Year Phase Silver Sand Snake Hole North prospects Total
Holes Metres Holes Metres Holes Metres Holes Metres
2017 Phase 1 drilling 18 5,020 - - - - 18 5,020
2018 177 49,991 - - - - 177 49,991
2019 Phase 2 drilling 182 39,917 24 5,957 - - 206 45,874
2020 Phase 3 drilling 5 899 8 1,590     13 2,489
2021 Phase 3 drilling 54 12,814 - - - - 54 12,814
2022 Phase 4 drilling 87 19,433 - - 9 4,298 96 23,731
Total 523 128,074 32 7,547 9 4,298 564 139,920

 

Notes:

·Table predominantly refers to drilling inside the 100% owned New Pacific mineral tenure as shown in Figure 10.1.
·Numbers may not compute exactly due to rounding.

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2020, based on data provided by New Pacific Metals Corp.

 

A local drill grid has been developed across the Property, comprising 100 m spaced drill sections orientated 060°-240° and numbered from 32 in the north-west, to 80 in the south-east shown in Figure 10.1. Drillhole IDs comprise a prefix which reflects the drillhole section, followed by a drillhole number. Drillholes have been drilled up to 545 m deep at inclinations between -45° and -80° towards azimuths of 060° (~NE) and 240° (~SW) to intercept the principal trend of mineralized vein structures perpendicularly.

 

Figure 10.1 shows the location of New Pacific drillholes completed at the Silver Sand Property.

 

amcconsultants.com93

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 10.1 Location map of drillholes in Silver Sand area

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.com94

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

10.2Drilling procedures

 

Diamond drill programs completed at the Property were designed and managed by New Pacific personnel. Drilling was completed by contract drilling companies Maldonado Exploraciones and Leduc Drilling SRL both out of La Paz, Bolivia.

 

Drillhole collars are located by New Pacific geologists using a Real-Time Kinematic differential global positioning system (GPS) and marked with a wooden stake. The site is then cleared, and sumps constructed to manage drill water and cuttings. The drill is then positioned by the drilling contractor and the drill alignment (inclination and azimuth) is confirmed by New Pacific geologists. The coordinate system used is WGS 84 UTM Zone 20S.2. Drilling operations are carried out as two separate shifts, 24 hours per day, seven days per week.

 

Core drilling is completed using conventional HQ (64 mm diameter) equipment and 3 m drill rods. The core is placed in plastic core boxes by the drilling contractor. Core blocks are placed at the end of each drill run with the driller marking the core recovery and drillhole depth by the drilling contractor. Each core box is marked with the drillhole ID and the corresponding from and to depths.

 

At the completion of each drillhole, PVC casing is placed by the drilling contractor in the drillhole. New Pacific personnel subsequently construct a concrete monument and mark the collar with the drillhole ID, depth, dip, azimuth. Such a monument and Leduc Rig #2-hole drilling DSS565013a, are shown in Figure 10.2.

 

Figure 10.2 Silver Sand drilling

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

10.2.1Drillhole deviation surveys

 

Drillhole deviation surveys are completed by the drilling contractor using a REFLEX EZ-SHOT and SPT GyroMaster downhole survey tools. Drillholes are surveyed at a depth of approximately 20 m, and on approximately 30 m intervals as drilling progresses. A second confirmation survey is carried out once the hole is complete. This is done on 30 m intervals as the drill rods are pulled out of the hole (multi-shot).

 

amcconsultants.com95

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

10.2.2Core processing and logging

 

New Pacific’s drill site supervising geologists visit each drill at least once daily to monitor drillhole progress. Core boxes are sorted and placed in order to enable core blocks and depths to be checked. Preliminary logging is then completed. This consists of completing a “quick log” of major geological features, marking of natural breaks, and analyzing veins with a portable XRF to determine silver concentrations, markings readings of XRF gun on drill cores and taking core photos on drill site. The drill-site core photos are uploaded to the Company’s Dropbox account for the Company’s management to review on daily basis so that drill plan can be adjusted instantly based on actual drill progress and mineralization.

 

Figure 10.3 Jisas North prospect drilling, showing “quicklog” process

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2020.

 

Prior to transportation, individual segments of core are sequentially numbered, and the core box is photographed as part of the chain of custody. Core containing visible mineralization is also wrapped in paper to minimize core damage during transport. Lids are placed on core boxes prior to transport.

 

Core boxes are transported by New Pacific personnel to the Company’s secure Betanzos core processing facility (Betanzos), daily following preliminary processing at site.

 

On arrival at Betanzos, the core boxes are checked and recorded in a core handover form that is signed by the receiver. Core boxes are then moved to the logging shack where detailed logging, processing, and sampling are completed. From 2017 to 2020 logging data was collected on paper

 

amcconsultants.com96

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

templates which were later transferred to an Excel file before being exported to an Access database. Since September 2020, as part of data management improvements the data entry and database compilation has been migrated to MX Deposit software, a Sequent product.

 

In general, New Pacific’s core logging process carried out at Betanzos comprises the following:

 

·Core is cleaned and drill core segments are pieced together.
·The length of core for each drill run is measured and recovery is calculated.
·Drillhole depths are marked on the core.
·Rock quality designation (RQD) is measured and basic geotechnical features are noted (fracture frequency).
·Geological logging is completed entering the data into MX Deposit software in computer tablets. The geological data collected includes oxidation style and intensity, lithology, alteration, structure, and mineralization information using codes established by New Pacific.
·Once the logging is complete, a geologist determines the core to be sampled based on alteration and mineralization, marks sample intervals and determines what QA/QC samples to be included.
·Samples for bulk density determinations are collected approximately every 20 m or every main alteration-mineralization interval. The samples are measured at a dedicated measuring station using water immersion and the Archimedes principle.
·Prior to core cutting, photographs of wet core are taken using a high-definition camera for the entire hole.
·After photography a cutting line is marked on the core based on the observed mineralization and structures.
·Core is cut in half using a diamond core saw and sampling is completed.
·Core boxes are then stored at Betanzos.
·Samples are dispatched to the laboratory on a weekly basis.

 

Sampling, shipment, and security protocols are described in Section 11 of this report.

 

10.3Sample recovery

 

Core recovery from New Pacific drill programs varies between 0% (voids and overburden) and 100%, averaging 96.85%. More than 94.55% of core intervals have a core recovery equal or greater than 95%.

 

10.4Drilling programs

 

10.4.1Exploration drilling – 2017 - 2018

 

The 2017 – 2018 phase one drill program was designed to test the depth and continuity of mineralization delineated by surface mapping and sampling in the Silver Sand area. Positive drill results led to ongoing drilling and the definition of numerous north-northwest striking and moderate to steeply west dipping zones of silver mineralization. The completed program was at a nominal drill spacing of 50 x 50 m and over a 1,600 x 800 m area. Ninety seven percent of drillholes (190 out of 195) encountered silver mineralization.

 

10.4.2Definition and exploration drilling - 2019

 

A phase two drill program commenced in April 2019. This program was designed to infill existing drilling within the Silver Sand deposit, and to assess the potential strike extensions of major mineralized zones beneath the Tarapaya Formation north of Section 44. The phase two 2019 drill program comprised the drilling of 182 drillholes for a total of 39,917 m. Drillholes ranged from 86 to 365 m in depth, averaging 225 m.

 

amcconsultants.com97

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The assay results confirmed the continuity of mineralization delineated in previous drilling campaigns and were used in the initial Mineral Resource estimation in early 2020 and as reported in the 2020 Technical Report.

 

10.4.3Definition, exploration, and metallurgical drilling - 2020

 

A phase three drill program was carried out from February to March 2020, prior to interruption. The program included collecting samples for metallurgy testwork, infill the existing drilling grid within the Silver Sand deposit, assess the potential strike extensions of major mineralized zones beneath the Tarapaya Formation and to test the mineralized zone at Snake Hole. Due to the pandemic lockdown, the drilling programs were paused from April 2020 to July 2021. A total of 13 drillholes for 2,489 m were completed in the attenuated program with hole lengths ranging from 100 m to 292.8 m and averaging 191 m.

 

10.4.3.1Definition and geotechnical drilling - 2021

 

The phase three drill program was continued in July 2021 and completed in September 2021. 54 drillholes for a total of 12,814 were completed during this stage. Drillholes ranged from 2.1 (abandoned) to 715.95 m in depth, averaging 237 m.

 

10.4.4Definition, exploration North prospects, and geotechnical drilling - 2022

 

The phase four drill program was completed from January 2022 to July 2022. The programs were designed to infill the high-grade core area of mineralization at the Silver Sand deposit, step-out test the known mineralization zones, and drill for the geotechnical study of the initially proposed pit wall. A further facet of the program was to explore and test the North Block prospects of EL Bronce and Jisas. A total of 96 drillholes for a total of 23,731 m were completed in this period. Drillholes ranged from 54.85 to 721.5 m in depth, averaging 247 m.

 

10.5Discussion of drilling results

 

10.5.1Silver Sand

 

Drill programs completed between October 2017 and July 2022 have defined silver mineralization at the Silver Sand deposit over a strike length of 2.5 km, and a width of 650 m and to a depth of more than 250 m below surface.

 

Silver mineralization occurs predominantly associated with dissemination, brecciated intervals, fractures, veinlets, and veins within the bleached and altered La Puerta sandstone. Within the core of the system, where vein density is greatest, mineralized zones are relatively continuous along strike and to depth, reaching thicknesses of up to 300 m. The core portion of the system shows good continuity. Mineralization outside of the core occurs as discontinuous pods and lenses often only multiple metres thick.

 

North of Section 60 mineralized zones generally dip west to the west at high angles. Drilling in this area typically intersects up to 50 m of red Cretaceous Tarapaya Formation before intersecting massive, white, altered and mineralized La Puerta sandstone. The contact between the Tarapaya and La Puerta Formation commonly contains massive pyrite which is up to 2 m thick. Historical mining activity does not appear to be widespread in this area.

 

South of Section 60, massive, altered, and fractured La Puerta sandstone is exposed at surface. Zones of silver mineralization typically dip to the west at high angles, and historical mining activity appears to be extensive. Figure 10.4 and Figure 10.5 show a plan view and three-dimensional (3D) perspective of the mineralization on the Property, respectively.

 

amcconsultants.com98

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 10.4 Silver Sand mineralization – plan view

 

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.com99

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 10.5 Silver Sand mineralization – 3D perspective

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

Figure 10.6 and Figure 10.7 present cross section views through the center and south portions of deposit, showing the intersection angles of the zones by the drilling. The grade shells shown are built at a > 20 g/t Ag threshold and the mineralized intersections shown are calculated at a 30 g/t Ag cut-off.

 

Figure 10.6 Cross Section 5250, Silver Sand center area

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.com100

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 10.7 Cross Section 6400, Silver Sand south area

 

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

10.5.2Snake Hole

 

New Pacific’s Snake Hole prospect is located approximately 600 m east of the Silver Sand deposit. This prospect comprises a 1 km long NNW-SSE trend comprising extensive historical artisanal mining activities and mine dumps. Historical workings are developed in bleached sandstone and suggest mineralization is between a few metres and up to 100 m wide. Previous sampling of workings and dumps in this Snake Hole area by New Pacific returned numerous assay results between 100 g/t Ag and 300 g/t Ag. Geological mapping also suggested that mineralized structures extend north-west towards the Company’s Jisas-El Fuerte prospects.

 

A total of 32 HQ diamond drillholes totalling 7,547 m were completed to assess sub-surface mineralization within the Snake Hole prospect area between August 2019 to March 2020 Drillholes were completed on a drilling grid at a 50 m spacing along the steeply dipping structure striking NNW-SSE. Each section was drilled with at least one drillhole at an inclination between 40° and 80°. The majority of drillholes were drilled towards an azimuth of 060°, four holes were drilled towards 240° and two drillholes were drilled towards 285° and 195° respectively as part of a drill fan. Drillhole locations are presented in Figure 10.8.

 

amcconsultants.com101

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 10.8 Location of drillholes, Snake Hole prospect

 

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.com102

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

10.5.3Drilling of North prospect

 

The North prospect consists of El Bronce and Jisas, which are located approximately 3.5 km to NNW from the center of Silver Sand deposit. This prospect comprises a 2 km long NNW-SSE trend comprising extensive historical artisanal mining activities and mine dumps. Historical workings are developed in bleached sandstone and strongly altered dacitic intrusive rocks, and suggest mineralization is between a few metres and up to 100 m wide.

 

A total of nine HQ diamond drillholes totaling 4,297.9 m were completed between May to July 2022. Drillholes were completed on a drilling grid at a 50 m spacing along the East-West section lines at Jisas and along a N20E grid at El Bronce. All holes were drilled at an angle of -45°. The majority of drillholes were drilled on the grids. Only one hole (DSSJS1703) was drilled off grid. Hole DSSJS1702 was abandoned due to downhole issues. Drillhole locations are presented in Figure 10.9. Drillhole collar information is presented in Table 10.2.

 

Table 10.2 Summary of North Prospects drillholes

 

Hole ID East (m) North (m) Elevation (m) Depth (m) Azimuth (°) Dip (°)
DSSJS1901 234,197.57 7,859,527.14 3,869.13 541.5 90 -45
DSSJS1701 234,237.50 7,859,423.20 3,856.11 433.5 270 -45
DSSJS1702 234,238.25 7,859,423.60 3,856.16 223.5 90 -45
DSSJS1702B 234,237.97 7,859,424.53 3,856.19 565.5 90 -45
DSSJS1703 234,236.98 7,859,423.94 3,856.20 505.5 218 -45
DSSBR195001 234,002.18 7,860,300.51 4,102.29 301.9 60 -45
DSSJS1801 234,246.02 7,859,476.75 3,862.35 496.5 90 -45
DSSBR2101 233,986.24 7,860,359.37 4,079.55 721.5 60 -47
DSSJS1802 234,245.60 7,859,476.84 3,862.27 508.5 270 -45

 

Note: Coordinate system: WGS 84, UTM20 S.

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., based on information provided by New Pacific Minerals Corp.

 

Drill results of North Block are pending as of the effective date of this report.

 

amcconsultants.com103

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 10.9 Drillholes of North Block

 

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.com104

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

10.6Review of drilling results

 

To the end of July of 2022, a total of 139,920 m in 564 drillholes have been completed on the Property. Most holes intersected silver mineralization hosted in altered sandstones and dacitic intrusions. Drill results confirmed the extent and continuity of mineralization at the Silver Sand deposit which remains open on strike and at depth.

 

Up to July 2022, assay results for 544 of 564 drillholes have been received. Highlights of drillhole intersections are presented in Table 10.3. The grades are length-weighted average, based on intersected widths and composited at a nominal 20 g/t Ag cut-off. As to a large degree the intersections are not far off normal to the trend of the mineralization the intersected and true widths are similar. This is demonstrated in Figure 10.6 and Figure 10.7.

 

Table 10.3 Drill intercepts for the Silver Sand deposit

 

Hole_ID   From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Ag (g/t) Pb (%) Zn (%)
DSS4402

 

Incl.

69.85 214.7 144.85 86 0.03 0.05
129.50 178.0 48.50 211 0.03 0.03

 

DSS4609

  63.38 147.3 83.92 116 0.07 0.10
Incl. 84.30 94.70 10.40 398 0.28 0.04
Incl. 138.40 147.30 8.90 414 0.15 0.02
DSS505003

 

Incl.

59.85 285.67 225.82 116 0.05 0.01
185.76 285.67 99.91 244 0.09 0.01

 

DSS505004

  73.50 168.70 95.20 162 0.06 0.13
Incl. 117.70 134.40 16.70 703 0.10 0.00
Incl. 161.40 168.70 7.30 291 0.09 0.00

 

DSS5604

 

Incl.

39.92 119.40 79.48 135 0.06 0.01
39.92 62.65 22.73 330 0.05 0.01
220.66 226.60 5.94 96 0.03 0.00
DSS525009

 

Incl.

59.90 238.89 178.99 96 0.03 0.02
126.49 144.52 18.03 362 0.03 0.00

 

DSS525010

  12.00 118.40 106.40 154 0.04 0.03
Incl. 12.00 50.75 38.75 165 0.04 0.04
Incl. 92.43 96.46 4.03 2,366 0.42 0.00
DSS5407

 

Incl.

64.07 140.10 76.03 205 0.09 0.01
64.07 124.96 60.89 251 0.10 0.01

 

DSS645001

  27.46 113.00 85.54 119 0.06 0.01
Incl. 27.46 53.50 26.04 189 0.05 0.00
Incl. 81.84 113.00 31.16 156 0.09 0.02
DSS6603A

 

Incl.

7.90 73.15 65.25 181 0.08 0.10
7.90 39.90 32.00 304 0.08 0.15

 

DSS665001

  44.23 134.00 89.77 115 0.12 0.31
Incl. 44.23 48.68 4.45 394 0.06 0.01
Incl. 58.00 95.15 37.15 149 0.17 0.34

 

 

DSS642501

  23.15 137.38 114.23 117 0.06 0.02
Incl. 23.15 31.43 8.28 265 0.01 0.00
Incl. 46.20 53.09 6.89 313 0.13 0.01
Incl. 103.83 107 3.17 1,105 0.21 0.06

 

amcconsultants.com105

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Hole_ID   From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Ag (g/t) Pb (%) Zn (%)
DSS422501

 

Incl.

41.70 146.20 104.50 183 0.05 0.11
80.25 146.20 65.95 282 0.05 0.00

 

DSS507502

  82.10 165.52 83.42 116 0.03 0.04
Incl. 82.10 108.65 26.55 242 0.06 0.05
Incl. 145.38 165.52 20.14 155 0.02 0.00

 

DSS507503

  98.50 155.86 57.36 354 0.11 0.02
Incl. 98.50 116.94 18.44 403 0.16 0.01
Incl. 142.70 146.30 3.60 3,378 0.72 0.05

 

DSS522503

  62.95 244.22 181.27 100 0.04 0.01
Incl. 128.05 222.23 94.18 177 0.06 0.01
Incl. 205.55 222.23 16.68 754 0.20 0.01

 

DSS5213

  61.90 241.80 179.90 88 0.09 0.02
Incl. 114.90 132.00 17.10 265 0.59 0.01
Incl. 173.98 187.15 13.17 339 0.04 0.00

 

DSS5214

  51.60 161.35 109.75 96 0.07 0.03
Incl. 54.35 68.50 14.15 250 0.06 0.01
Incl. 87.30 103.80 16.50 228 0.11 0.02

 

DSS522506

  73.80 239.30 165.50 204 0.06 0.01
Incl. 73.80 167.30 93.50 336 0.10 0.00
Incl. 116.30 161.30 45.00 641 0.19 0.01
DSS422503

 

Incl.

65.86 209.30 143.44 110 0.04 0.03
173.30 183.47 10.17 860 0.18 0.00
DSS522510   5.30 53.39 48.09 176 0.02 0.00
213.5 216.07 2.57 748 0.35 0.00
DSS565006

 

Incl.

19.91 84.37 64.46 250 0.09 0.01
40.00 60.70 20.70 613 0.16 0.01

 

DSS645005

  27.10 235.17 208.07 73 0.11 0.28
Incl. 86.57 90.28 3.71 513 0.33 0.46
Incl. 180.74 205.00 24.26 270 0.13 0.07
DSS407502

 

Incl.

90.12 158.00 67.88 218 0.04 0.00
137.00 149.34 12.34 496 0.11 0.00
DSS522513

 

Incl.

40.32 149.3 108.98 228 0.13 0.01
43.84 98.30 54.46 414 0.20 0.01
DSS525021

 

Incl.

4.90 284.15 279.25 91 0.09 0.00
217.55 232.95 15.40 657 0.24 0.00

 

DSS527505

  40.10 118.30 78.20 245 0.17 0.16
Incl. 43.30 71.74 28.44 335 0.20 0.07
Incl. 83.10 96.30 13.20 541 0.19 0.47

 

DSS644001

  23.00 156.63 133.63 91 0.05 0.04
Incl. 56.92 65.75 8.83 296 0.11 0.00
Incl. 90.00 112.56 22.56 246 0.06 0.02
DSS325001   147.66 155.30 7.64 448 0.09 0.00
163.00 182.76 19.76 150 0.06 0.10
DSS702501   84.90 139.09 54.19 132 0.38 0.54
178.80 184.00 5.20 46 0.04 0.00

 

amcconsultants.com106

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Hole_ID   From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Ag (g/t) Pb (%) Zn (%)

 

DSS685002

 

Incl.

 

11.66 42.96 31.30 171 0.02 0.00
26.75 41.46 14.71 298 0.03 0.00
120.2 148.53 28.33 48 0.09 0.02

 

DSS7002

  25.28 40.54 15.26 285 0.02 0.00
131.59 144.7 13.11 62 0.11 0.14
180.47 183.15 2.68 215 0.19 0.14

 

 

DSS487505

 

 

 

Incl.

 

 

32.45 51.93 19.48 337 0.00 0.00
38.53 47.16 8.63 715 0.00 0.00
91.83 103.88 12.05 160 0.03 0.00
162.96 180.87 17.91 78 0.48 0.01

 

 

DSS582501

 

  30.57 75.34 44.77 214 0.10 0.00
  151.46 176.50 25.04 143 0.07 0.11
Incl. 151.46 154.00 2.54 823 0.07 0.00
Incl. 169.00 171.12 2.12 536 0.31 0.17
DSS5218

 

Incl.

60.50 132.94 72.44 279 0.06 0.04
84.95 117.91 32.96 517 0.10 0.06

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., based on information provided by New Pacific Minerals Corp.

 

10.7Drilling conclusions

 

At this time there are no known drilling, sampling, or recovery factors that could impact the accuracy and reliability of the results. Due to fine-grained mineralization occurring on fractures, there is the possibility of loss of mineralization during the drilling, transportation, and core handling processes, which may lead to underestimation of the grade.

 

amcconsultants.com107

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

11Sample preparation, analyses, and security

 

This section describes the sampling methods, analytical techniques and assay QA/QC protocols employed at the Silver Sand Property between October 2017 and July 2022, with a focus on the 2020 – July 2022 period. All exploration programs were managed by New Pacific, and all work was carried out in accordance with New Pacific’s internal procedures.

 

11.1Sampling methods

 

11.1.1Rock chip sampling

 

Rock chip samples were collected by New Pacific personnel from surface outcrop and existing underground workings. In both cases, continuous samples were collected from sample lines across mineralization using a hammer and chisel. Surface outcrop sample lines were orientated approximately perpendicular to the strike of mineralization and samples were collected at 1.5 m intervals. Underground samples were collected at 1.0 m intervals from the walls of accessible tunnels that cross-cut mineralization.

 

In both instances, samples were collected in plastic bags. Sample information was recorded in a sample tag book pre-numbered with a unique sample identifier and multiple tear-off tags. One sample tag is included in the plastic bag with the sample, before the bag is sealed. The sample number is also written on each bag with a permanent indelible marker.

 

11.1.2Grab sampling

 

Grab samples were collected by New Pacific personnel from waste rock dumps generated by historical mining operations. Samples were collected randomly from the waste dumps. The number of samples collected was dependent on the size of the dump.

 

11.1.3Drillhole sampling

 

All drilling completed at the Property between September 2021 and July 2022 was completed by contract diamond drillers using HQ (64 mm) sized equipment. Drilling, logging, and core processing procedures are described in detail in Section 10 of this report. This process is in line with the procedures which were implemented for the earlier programs which were described in the 2020 Technical Report.

 

Core sampling was completed by New Pacific personnel at Betanzos as part of the core processing workflow. After samples are logged, sample intervals are identified by the geologists based on visual parameters. Individual sample intervals are physically marked out on the core using an indelible marker or crayon at intervals between 1.0 and 1.5 m lengths and respecting geological, structural and alteration contacts and poor sample recovery (voids, sample loss) as appropriate. Sampling intervals typically extend above and below the visually mineralized zone by 2 m. Core intervals with no recovery due to core loss or intersection of historical mine workings are identified and recorded.

 

During this sampling process the geologist records the hole ID and relevant from and to interval of the sample in a sample tag book pre-numbered with a unique sample identifier and two tear-off tags. A cut line is also marked along the core axis with a marker of crayon by geologists at this time.

 

After the core has been photographed, core to be sampled is cut in half along the cut line using a diamond saw. Half of the core is then collected consistently from one side of the cutting line and placed into sample bags pre-labelled with a corresponding unique sample number. Samples intervals are cross checked with the sample tag book and the prelabelled sample bag. The outer

 

amcconsultants.com108

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

portion of the tear off sample tag is affixed to the core box at the start of the sample interval and the inner tear-off tag is placed into the sample bag.

 

Once sampling is complete the geologist checks the samples and seals the plastic sample bags with staples and tape. QA/QC samples are inserted into the sample sequence and sample bags are then placed into large poly-weave sample bags for transportation to the laboratory. Individual sample batches comprise up to 100 samples.

 

Figure 11.1 New Pacific Betanoz core logging and sampling facility

 

Notes: Left: core logging area, Right: diamond core saws.

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

11.2Sample shipment and security

 

New Pacific manages all aspects of sampling from the collection of samples to sample delivery to the laboratory. All samples are stored and processed at Betanzos. This facility is surrounded by a brick wall, has a locked gate, and is monitored by video surveillance and security guard 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Within the facility, there are separate and locked areas for core logging, sampling, and storage.

 

Drilling samples are collected from the drill site at the Property at least every 24 hours as part of routine site inspections and drill management completed by site geologists. Geological “quick logs”, portable XRF analyses and photographs of each core box are completed during the site inspection and before core boxes are transported.

 

Samples are transported from the Betanzos facility to the laboratory in Oruro, Bolivia for sample preparation. This is done on a weekly basis by New Pacific personnel. Sample shipments typically comprise up to 800 samples.

 

amcconsultants.com109

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 11.2 New Pacific Betanoz core processing facility

 

 

Notes: Left: core processing facility security, Right: core storage.

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

11.3Sample preparation and analysis

 

All drill core, chip and grab samples collected by New Pacific between September 2021 and July 2022 were dispatched to ALS laboratories (ALS) in Oruro, Bolivia for sample preparation, and then to ALS in Lima, Peru for geochemical analysis. ALS Oruro and ALS Lima are part of ALS Global – an independent commercial laboratory specializing in analytical geochemistry services. Both labs are certified in accordance with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and International Electrotechnical Commission (IES) “General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories” (ISO/IES 17025:2017).

 

All samples are prepared in accordance with ALS preparation code PREP-31 which involves crushing samples to 70% less than 2 mm, riffle splitting off 250 g and then pulverizing the split sample to better than 85% passing a 75 µm (micron) sieve.

 

All pulp samples were then transferred to ALS Lima for sample analysis. A summary of analytical methods used is presented in Table 11.2.

 

Sample analysis completed in 2017 and 2018 comprised an aqua regia digest followed by Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (AES) analysis of Ag, Pb, and Zn (ALS code OG46). Samples returning assay results greater than 1,500 g/t Ag (over-limit samples) were analyzed by fire assay and gravimetric finish (ALS code Ag-GRA21). New Pacific subsequently requested all pulp samples with Ag values greater than 5 ppm be analyzed using an ICP-AES 35 element analysis (ALS code ME-ICP41). This approach was taken primarily to understand the impact of potential credit elements gallium and indium.

 

New Pacific changed its analysis protocol in 2019 to include systematic multielement analysis. All samples were sent for an initial 51 element ICP mass spectroscopy (MS) analysis (ALS code ME-MS41). Over-limit samples (>100 ppm Ag, or >10,000 ppm Pb or >10,000 ppm Zn) were then analyzed by ALS code OG46. For the third pass, for over-limit Samples with Ag results which exceeded the upper limit of detection of the OG46 analysis (>1,500 ppm) were then subsequently analyzed by fire assay and gravimetric analysis (Ag-GRA21).

 

amcconsultants.com110

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 11.1 New Pacific sample analysis

 

Drill
campaign
ALS analysis
code*
Elements Detection range Description Protocol notes

 

 

 

 

 

2017 – 2018

Ag-OG46

Pb-OG46

Zn-OG46

Ag

Pb

Zn

1-1,500 ppm

0.001-20%

0.01-10%

0.4 g sample

Aqua-regia digest

ICP-AES analysis

Initial analysis

Ag samples > 1,500 ppm analyzed by AG-GRA21

 

Ag-GRA21

 

Ag

 

5-10,000 ppm

30 g sample

Fire assay

gravimetric analysis

 

Over limit analysis

VH-ME-ICP4

(Actlabs)

Ag

Pb, Zn

35 other elements

0.2-100 ppm

2-10,000 ppm

variable

0.5 g sample

Aqua-regia digest

ICP-OES analysis

Subsequent analysis completed on pulps with Ag >=5 ppm

 

 

 

 

 

2019
2020 - 2022

 

 

ME-MS41

Ag

Pb

Zn

48 other elements

0.01-100 ppm

0.2-10,000 ppm

2-10,000 ppm

variable

0.5 g sample

Aqua-regia digest

ICP-MS analysis

Initial analysis

Over limit samples analyzed by OG-46

Ag-OG46

Pb-OG46

Zn-OG46

Ag

Pb

Zn

1-1,500 ppm

0.001-20 %

0.01-10 %

0.4 g sample

Aqua-regia digest

ICP-AES analysis

(Over limit analysis #1)

Ag samples > 1,500 ppm analyzed by Ag-GRA21

 

Ag-GRA21

 

Ag

 

5-10,000 ppm

30 g sample

Fire assay, gravimetric

analysis

 

(Over limit analysis #2)

 

Notes: *Unless otherwise stated.

Overlimit protocols shown for 2019 but were refined for later programs as described in the text below.

Source: Compiled by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

For the 2020 – 2022 analysis protocol, there was a slight variation in how over-limit samples were defined after the ICP mass spectrometry analysis. First pass over-limit samples (Ag > 30 ppm, or > 10,000 ppm Pb or Zn) were analyzed using aqua regia digestion with Inductively Coupled Plasma- Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-AES) or Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) finish (ALS Code OG46).

 

Samples with gold mineralization went to a second pass of analysis by fire assay and AAS finish (ALS Code Au-AA25). If these samples > 100 ppm, they were analysed by fire assay with gravimetric finish (ALS Code Au-GRA21) which has an upper detection limit of 1,000 ppm. Au samples > 1,000 ppm underwent analysis by fire assay with gravimetric finish (ALS Code Au-CON01).

 

Samples with > 1,500 ppm Ag were analysed by fire assay with gravimetric finish (ALS Code Ag-GAR21) with an upper detection limit of 10,000 ppm. Ag samples > 10,000 ppm underwent analysis by fire assay with gravimetric finish (ALS Code Ag-CON01).

 

Samples with > 20% Pb, 30% Zn, and 40% Cu underwent analysis by classic titration methods (ALS Code Pb-VOL70, Zn-VOL50, and Cu-VOL61).

 

11.4Bulk density

 

Density measurements are completed by New Pacific personnel as part of routine core processing procedures. Samples are selected in both mineralized and non-mineralized areas at a rate of 1 in every 15 samples. Measurements are completed at a dedicated density weigh station using the Archimedes principle, whereby water displacement is used to approximate volume. Density is calculated by dividing the dry weight by the calculated volume. This method is considered to be

 

amcconsultants.com111

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

appropriate for competent, non-porous core samples. Weigh scale calibration is completed regularly as part of the density sampling program.

 

The QP recommends New Pacific improve density QA/QC procedures by:

 

·Incorporating the regular use of a density standard.
·Weigh samples following immersion to ensure that the sample is not absorbing water.
·Sending a portion of samples to a third-party laboratory for a density measurement check.

 

11.5Quality Assurance / Quality Control

 

New Pacific has established QA/QC procedures which cover sample collection and processing at the Silver Sand Property. All drilling programs completed on the property incorporate the insertion of certified reference materials (CRMs), blanks, and duplicates into the sample stream on a batch-by-batch basis. The QP completed a detailed review of QA/QC protocols during a site visit in 2019 and again in May 2022. The following discussion is based on the QP’s findings from the site visit and an independent review of drilling and QA/QC databases associated with the 556 drillholes for which assays have been received at the date of closure of the database for the Mineral Resource.

 

New Pacific monitors Ag, Au, Pb, Zn, and Cu assay values in CRMs, blanks, and duplicates however only the results of silver are discussed in this report as silver constitutes the majority of the value in the Mineral Resource.

 

A summary of QA/QC samples from the October 2017 – July 2022 program is presented in Table 11.2.

 

Table 11.2 Silver Sand QA/QC samples by year1 (October 2017 – July 2022)

 

Year2

Drill
Samples

CRMs3

Coarse
Blanks
Pulp
Blanks
Field
duplicates
(¼ core)
Pulp
duplicates
Coarse
reject
duplicates
Coarse reject
umpire
duplicates
2017 3,213 172 31 0 16 0 0 173
2018 34,638 1,747 1,684 0 208 0 0 1,615
2019 30,629 1,106 1,159 0 243 0 0 1,063
2020 1,735 359 422 0 0 0 0 0
2021 7,688 433 327 141 309 288 312 0
2022 12,292 678 435 305 496 449 484 0
Total 90,175 4,495 4,058 446 1,272 737 796 2,851

 

Notes:

1Based on 556 drillholes with assay results.
2Drillhole year based on the date of the Ag assay.
3CRM statistics excludes CRMs submitted with umpire duplicate samples.

Source: Compiled by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

Table 11.3 summarizes the insertion rate of these QA/QC samples. New Pacific’s QA/QC submission rate protocols are:

 

·CRMs: 5%
·Coarse blanks – 3%
·Field duplicates – 2 - 3%
·Coarse reject duplicates – 2 – 3%
·Pulp duplicates – 2 – 3%
·Umpires – 5%

 

amcconsultants.com112

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The QP recommends that insertion rates should be approximately 5% for CRMs and blanks and 6% for duplicates (2% each for field, coarse reject, and pulps duplicates) and 5% for umpires.

 

Table 11.3Silver Sand QA/QC submission rates1 (October 2017 – July 2022)

 

Year2

CRMs3

Coarse
Blanks
Pulp
Blanks
Field
duplicates
(¼ core)
Pulp
duplicates
Coarse
reject
duplicates
Coarse reject
umpire
duplicates
Total
QA/QC
2017 5.4% 1.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 5.4% 12.2%
2018 5.0% 4.9% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 4.7% 15.2%
2019 3.6% 3.8% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 3.5% 11.7%
2020 20.7% 24.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 45.0%
2021 5.7% 4.3% 1.8% 4.0% 3.8% 4.1% 0.0% 23.6%
2022 5.5% 3.5% 2.5% 4.0% 3.7% 4.0% 0.0% 23.2%
Overall 5.0% 4.5% 0.5% 1.4% 0.8% 0.9% 3.2% 16.3%

 

Notes:

1 Based on 550 drillholes with assay results.

2 Drillhole year based on the date of the Ag assay.

3 CRM statistics excludes CRMs submitted with umpire duplicate samples.

Source: Compiled by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

11.5.1Certified Reference Materials

 

11.5.1.1Description

 

Four different CRMs were used by New Pacific in the 2017 – July 2022 drill programs, one of which, CDN-ME-1605 was discontinued in 2018. All CRMs were supplied by CDN Resource Laboratories of Langley, British Columbia, Canada and are certified for Ag, Au, Pb, Cu, and Zn analysis by four acid digest and ICP. All CRMs have a relative standard deviation (RSD) of less than 5%.

 

Details of CRMs used at Silver Sand are presented in Table 11.4.

 

Table 11.4 Silver Sand CRMs (October 2017 – July 2022)

 

CRM

Ag (g/t) Number of CRMs inserted by year
Expected value Certified SD 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
CDN-ME-1501 34.6 1.15 0 0 370 133 189 231
CDN-ME-1603 86 1.5 0 999 496 144 155 285
CDN-ME-1810 154 4.5 0 0 240 82 89 162
CDN-ME-1605 274 4.5 172 748 0 0 0 0

 

Notes: All CRM values shown are certified for four-acid digest and ICP analysis, SD=standard deviation.

Source: Compiled by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

CRMs are supplied as both 100 g individual sealed packages and in bulk 1 kg containers. New Pacific personnel package bulk material into 100 g ‘zip-lock’ bags for insertion into the sample stream. Disposable gloves and spoons are used to ensure contamination does not occur during this process.

 

New Pacific’s internal procedures require that one CRM is inserted for every 20 samples. CRM performance is monitored on a batch-by-batch basis. New Pacific considers CRMs with laboratory assay results outside of three standard deviations as stipulated on the CRM certificate to have failed. Failed samples are investigated by New Pacific and sample batches are re-analyzed as required. For ME-MS41 analysis, New Pacific accepts assay results within 10% plus 2 times the detection limit of the expected value of the CRM, based on internal discussions with ALS. New Pacific has re-assayed

 

amcconsultants.com113

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

two sample batches. Batches that failed but did not contain mineralized material were not re-assayed.

 

11.5.1.2Discussion

 

CRMs contain standard, predetermined concentrations of material (Ag) which are inserted to into the sample stream to check the analytical accuracy of the laboratory. The QP recommends an insertion rate of at least 5% of the total samples assayed. CRMs should be monitored on a batch-by-batch basis and remedial action taken immediately if required. For each economic mineral, the QP recommends the use of at least three CRMs with values:

 

·At the approximate cut-off grade (COG) of the deposit.
·At the approximate expected grade of the deposit.
·At a higher grade.

 

A total of 4,495 CRMs was submitted between October 2017 and July 2022 representing an average overall insertion rate of 5.0%. Insertion rates for CRMs have been consistently above 5% on a yearly basis except for 2019.

 

The average grade of the Silver Sand open pit Mineral Resource is approximately 116 g/t Ag at a 30 g/t Ag COG. The QP considers CDN-ME-1501 (34.6 g/t Ag) to be appropriate to monitor the analytical accuracy at the COG of the deposit. CDN-ME-1603 (86 g/t Ag) and CDN-ME-1810 (154 g/t Ag) monitor analytical accuracy below and above the average grade. CDN-ME-1605 (274 g/t Ag) monitors analytical accuracy at higher grades, however this CRM was not used beyond the 2018 program. The QP notes that there was no CRM used in 2017 or 2018 to monitor laboratory accuracy at the cut-off and average grades. While there is presently no individual CRM monitoring the average grade of the deposit, the QP considers CDN-ME-1603 and CDN-ME-1810 to adequately cover the anticipated grade ranges and provide confidence in analytical results.

 

The QP typically recommends re-assaying batches where two consecutive CRMs in a batch occur outside two standard deviations (warning), or one CRM occurs outside of three standard deviations (fail) of the expected value described on the assay certificate.

 

Control charts are commonly used to monitor the analytical performance of an individual CRM over time. CRM assay results are plotted in order of analysis. Control lines are also plotted on the chart for the expected value of the CRM, two standard deviations above and below the expected value, and three standard deviations above and below the expected value. These charts show analytical drift, bias, trends, and irregularities occurring at the laboratory over time. Table 11.5 presents detail on CRM performance for the entire period October 2017 – July 2022.

 

Table 11.5 Silver Sand CRM warnings and fails (October 2017 – July 2022)

 

CRM ID

Expected
value (Ag)
Certified
SD
Number
of assays
# Low
warnings
(-2SD)
# High
warnings
(+2SD)
# Low fail
(-3SD)
High fail
(+3SD)
Fail %
(>3SD)
CDN-ME-1501 34.6 g/t 1.15 923 25 21 4 4 0.87
CDN-ME-1603 86 g/t 1.5 2,079 182 38 86 54 6.73
CDN-ME-1810 154 g/t 4.5 573 7 6 0 0 0.00
CDN-ME-1605 274 g/t 4.5 920 73 13 24 3 2.9

 

Notes: SD=standard deviation.

Source: Compiled by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

Figure 11.3 to Figure 11.5 presents CRM control charts for silver. Control charts include control lines for two and three standard deviations and show the warnings and fails. The control charts cover the

 

amcconsultants.com114

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

period from 2020 to July 2022, (2019 to July 2022 in the case of CDN-ME- 1501). Example control charts from the period of 2017 to 2019 were presented in the 2020 Technical Report.

 

Figure 11.3Control chart for CDN-ME-1501 (Ag) (2019 – July 2022)

 

 

Note: CDN-ME-1501 contains all samples from 2019, not all 2019 samples were reported in the previous Technical Report.

Source: Compiled by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

Figure 11.4 Control chart for CDN-ME-1603 (Ag) (2020 – July 2022)

 

 

Source: Compiled by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.com115

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 11.5 Control chart for CDN-ME-1810 (Ag) (2020 – July 2022)

 

 

Source: Compiled by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

Table 11.6 shows the comparison between the CRM and analytical results for the period 2020 – July 2022. There has been a slight improvement for CDN-ME-1603 since the end of 2019 onwards, the means are very similar and there is a slight reduction in the difference between the standard deviations. The other two CRMs performed similarly, with acceptable comparisons.

 

Table 11.6 Comparison between CRM values and analytical results (2020 – July 2022)

 

 

CRM

CRM Analytical results Comparison
Expected Ag
value (ppm)
SD Number
of assays
Mean SD Mean vs
expected
SD of results
vs expected
CDN-ME-1501 34.6 1.2 923 34.5 1.2 99.71% 100%
CDN-ME-1603 86 1.5 584 85.8 2.7 99.77% 144.44%
CDN-ME-1810 154 4.5 333 153.8 3.9 99.87% 85%

 

Source: Compiled by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

The QP noted the following in the previous Technical Report for the property regarding CRM performance, which covered the period October 2017 – 2019:

 

·CRMs used at Silver Sand generally show overall acceptable analytical accuracy.
·The mean and standard deviation of analytical results approximate the certified performance criteria and provide confidence in analytical results at the deposit COG and at higher grades (150 g/t Ag).
·From 2017 – 2019 CDN-ME-1603 showed poor analytical precision with a significant number of analytical results occurring outside of two standard deviations, and 5.4% of samples occurring outside of three standard deviations (failure limits).
·CRM CDN-ME-1605 also showed sub-optimal analytical precision with a significant number of analytical results occurring outside of two standard deviations and 2.9% of samples occurring outside three standard deviations (failure limits). While the average analytical results of CDN-ME-1605 are only ~1% lower than the certified mean, the majority of samples outside control limits are biased low. The standard deviation of analytical results is ~1.5 times greater than the certified value.

 

amcconsultants.com116

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

·The excessive number of warnings and failures occurring in CDN-ME-1603 and CDN-ME-1605 is concerning and should be further investigated prior to continued use. Standard deviations of analytical results from these CRMs are 1.5 times greater than the between laboratory standard deviation provided by the CRM supplier. The QP notes that CRMs were certified using a four-acid digest but that methods OG46 and ME-MS41 comprise an aqua-regia digest. This difference in sample digestion may explain poor CRM performance.

 

The QP notes that similar results are observed in CRM performance post 2019 and reiterates the following with respect to CRM performance for the 2020 – July 2022 period:

 

·CRMs used at Silver Sand generally show overall acceptable analytical accuracy.
·CRMs CDN-ME-1501 and CDN-ME-1810 still show acceptable analytical precision, exhibiting low failure rates and with the majority of results falling within the control limits (3 standard deviations).
·The number of warnings and failures occurring in CDN-ME-1603 should be further investigated prior to continued use. The QP notes that CRMs were certified using a four-acid digest but that methods OG46 and ME-MS41 comprise an aqua-regia digest. This difference in sample digestion may explain poor CRM performance.

 

11.5.1.3Recommendations

 

The QP makes the following recommendations regarding CRMs at the Silver Sand project:

 

·Purchase an additional CRM around the average grade (116 g/t Ag) of the deposit which has been certified using a similar digestion method.
·Investigate performance issues with CRM CDN-ME-1603 if this CRM is to be used in future programs. This could be done by preparing several separate sample batches comprising 20-30 CRMs each and comprising at least two different CRMs in random order. Each batch should then be sent to both the primary laboratory and at least one other check laboratory. If results occur outside of certified performance criteria, expected values and standard deviation can be calculated from laboratory results and used as performance criteria.
·Re-evaluate the use of ME-MS41 analytical method. If this method is to be used going forward it is recommended that the OG46 over-limit threshold be dropped from 100 g/t Ag to a level below the anticipated COG. This is because of the poor precision of this method for Ag.

 

11.5.2Blank samples

 

11.5.2.1Description

 

New Pacific uses material collected from quarry sites, local to the deposit as the source of coarse blank material. Cobble to boulder sized material is collected from a quarry site and broken with hammers into cm sized pieces by New Pacific personnel for insertion into the sample stream.

 

Two different sources have been used as blank material over time. Limestone from a quarry site near Betanzos was used as the initial source of blank material, however this was changed in July 2018 after receiving numerous results with elevated base metals. A new blank quarry site was subsequently sourced approximately 30 km west of Silver Sand. Blank material collected from this quarry comprises red quartz sandstone of similar age and composition to that hosting mineralization at the Silver Sand deposit. Five grab samples from this quarry site were sent for analysis at ALS using ME-MS41. Results ranged between 0.01 and 0.04 g/t Ag, averaging 0.02 g/t Ag.

 

New Pacific’s internal procedures require that one coarse blank is inserted for every 20 samples. For the period October 2017 – 2019, New Pacific considered blank samples with assay results above 1.3 g/t Ag as a warning and samples above 2.4 g/t Ag a fail. These control limits were developed by New Pacific after reviewing analytical data, removing outliers, and calculating the average

 

amcconsultants.com117

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

background grade and standard deviation of the blank material. The warning and fail limits are set at three times the standard deviation, and six times the standard deviation of background samples respectively. Commencing in August 2019 New Pacific implemented a procedure for laboratory follow up. Assays from blank samples that exceed the warning limit are investigated by New Pacific personnel and followed up as necessary. Assays from blank samples that exceed the fail limit are discussed with the laboratory and re-analyzed as required.

 

For the programs post 2019, the New Pacific protocols for the assessment of the performance of blanks has been adjusted slightly, a warning is considered above 1 Ag ppm and a failure is considered above 2 Ag ppm. The change in protocol means that the threshold for failure is lower than for the 2017 – 2019 coarse blank samples. The QP considers this adjustment reasonable.

 

Pulp blanks were submitted in 2021 and 2022. The blank material is CRM CDN-GEO-1901. The source of the CRM is from a copper-gold porphyry deposit in British Columbia. The CRM has a provisional mean for Ag of 1 ppm with a standard deviation of 0.15. The analytical method was four acid digestion with instrumental finish.

 

11.5.2.2Discussion

 

Coarse blanks

 

Coarse blanks test for contamination during both sample preparation and assaying. Blanks should be inserted in each batch sent to the laboratory. In the QP’s opinion, when using typical feed grade analytical methods, 80% of coarse blanks should be less than three times the detection limit.

 

A total of 4,058 coarse blank samples have been inserted since 2017, 1,184 of which were submitted between 2020 – July 2022, representing an overall insertion rate of 4.5%. The QP considers this an acceptable insertion rate.

 

For the October 2017 – 2019 period blank performance, New Pacific used a failure criteria for samples analyzed by ALS method OG46 as 2.4 times the Ag detection limit. The QP acknowledged that applying a failure limit of three times this detection limit (0.01 g/t Ag) may not be practical for ore grade level analysis but recommended the failure criteria level be reduced from 2.4 g/t Ag if ME-MS41 was to be used on an ongoing basis. This has been implemented. In the QP’s opinion the blank monitoring procedures implemented by New Pacific over the 2017 – 2019 period were adequate to identify significant sample contamination during sample preparation and analysis. Blank samples showed no significant systematic levels of contamination.

 

Table 11.7 summarizes the coarse blank performance based on the New Pacific failure criteria for the period 2020 – July 2022. There has been an improvement in performance since 2019. Coarse blank samples show no significant systematic levels of contamination.

 

Table 11.7 Silver Sand coarse blank performance (2020 – July 2022)

 

Year Total <1 Ag ppm
(Pass)
1 - 2 Ag ppm
(Warning)

> 2 ppm

(Fail)

2020 422 419 1 2
2021 327 326 0 1
2022 435 430 2 1
Total 1,184 1,175 3 4

 

Source: Compiled by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.com118

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 11.6 Coarse blank control chart (2020 – July 2022)

 

 

Note: The extreme value recorded in 2022 is 20.5 Ag ppm.

Source: Compiled by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

The QP notes that consistent monitoring and follow up of coarse blank samples has only been completed and clearly documented since mid-2019, in that same year two sample investigations were completed. In both cases, samples before and after the failed blank were re-analyzed. Contamination was found to have occurred during sample preparation, from a preceding high-grade Ag interval. For 2020 onwards, only three failures have been recorded in 2022. Investigation determined that this was due to elevated values in the blank sample which can happen due to the source of the material. These samples also returned slightly elevated values for base metals.

 

In the QP’s opinion, the coarse blank monitoring procedures implemented by New Pacific are adequate to identify significant sample contamination during sample preparation and analysis. Blank samples show no significant systematic levels of contamination.

 

Pulp blanks

 

Pulp blanks test for contamination occurring during the analytical process. Blanks should be inserted in each batch sent to the laboratory. In the QP’s opinion, when using typical ore grade analytical methods is that 90% of pulp blanks should be within two times of the detection limit.

 

A total of 446 pulp blank samples have been inserted since 2021, representing an overall insertion rate of 0.5%. The QP has applied the following protocols for assessing the pulp blank samples. The value of 1.3 Ag ppm is equivalent to the provisional mean of the CRM plus two times the standard deviation. This would equate to a warning value for a CRM, and a failure value of 1.45 Ag ppm (provisional mean plus three standard deviations). Table 11.8 and Figure 11.7 show the pulp blank performance. There are two samples which show contamination.

 

amcconsultants.com119

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 11.8 Silver Sand pulp blank performance (2021 – July 2022)

 

Year Total

<1.3 ppm Ag

(Pass)

1.3 to 1.45 ppm Ag
(Warning)

> 1.45 ppm Ag

(Fail)

2021 141 139 1 1
2022 305 301 3 1
Total 446 440 4 2

 

Source: Compiled by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

Figure 11.7 Pulp blank control chart (2021 – July 2022)

 

 

Note: The two extreme values are 35.5 and 18.6 Ag ppm, respectively.

Source: Compiled by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

In the QP’s opinion, the pulp blank monitoring procedures implemented by New Pacific are adequate to identify significant sample contamination during sample analysis. Blank samples show no significant systematic levels of contamination.

 

11.5.2.3Recommendations

 

The QP makes the following recommendations regarding blank samples:

 

·Continue to include coarse and pulp blanks in every batch of samples submitted at a rate of at least 1 in every 20 samples (5%).
·Continue to ensure that blanks are consistently monitored in real time on a batch-by-batch basis and that remedial action is taken as issues arise.
·Ensure that all blank sample follow up is recorded.

 

11.5.3Duplicate samples

 

11.5.3.1Description

 

New Pacific has submitted a total of 1,272 quarter core field duplicate samples during the period October 2017 – July 2022, of which 805 were submitted from 2021 – July 2022. Field duplicate samples are selected once assay results have been received to ensure that duplicate samples encompass the entire grade range. Duplicate samples are collected by cutting the remaining half core in half. One portion of the quarter core is submitted for duplicate analysis, and the remaining portion of quarter core is returned to the core tray.

 

amcconsultants.com120

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

New Pacific did not submit pulp duplicates prior to 2019, however, submitted 737 pulp duplicate samples between 2021 and July 2022.

 

New Pacific did not submit coarse reject duplicates prior to 2019, however, submitted 796 coarse reject duplicate samples between 2021 and July 2022.

 

11.5.3.2Discussion

 

Field duplicates monitor sampling variance, sample preparation and analytical variance, and geological variance. Coarse reject samples monitor sub-sampling variance, analytical variance, and geological variance. Pulp duplicates monitor analytical and geological variance.

 

The QP recommends that field, coarse and pulp duplicate samples be selected over the entire range of grades seen at the Project to ensure that the geological heterogeneity is understood. However, the majority of duplicate samples should be selected from zones of mineralization. Unmineralized or very low-grade samples should not form a significant portion of duplicate sample programs as analytical results approaching the stated limit of lower detection are commonly inaccurate, and do not provide a meaningful assessment of variance.

 

Duplicate data can be assessed using a variety of approaches. The QP typically assesses duplicate data using scatterplots and relative paired difference (RPD) plots. These plots measure the absolute difference between a sample and its duplicate. For field duplicates it is desirable to achieve 80% to 85% of the pairs having less than 20% RPD between the original assay and check assay. For coarse reject duplicates it is desirable to achieve 80% to 85% of the pairs having less than 15% RPD between the original assay and check assay. For pulp duplicates it is desirable to achieve 80% to 85% of the pairs having less than 10% RPD between the original assay and check assay. In these analyses, pairs with a mean of less than 15 times the lower limit of analytical detection are excluded. Removing these low values ensures that there is no undue influence on the RPD plots due to the higher variance of grades expected near the lower detection limit, where precision becomes poorer (Long et al., 1997). For the assessment of the 2021 – July 2022 field duplicates, a lower detection limit of 0.01 Ag ppm was used and is based on the ME-MS41 analytical method. Prior to this, a lower detection limit of 1 Ag ppm was used based on the Ag-OG46 analytical method.

 

Field duplicates

 

Submission rates for the field duplicates has varied from year to year, with < 1% submission rates prior to 2021. For 2021 and 2022, the submission rates are 4%. The overall submission rate of field duplicates for the period October 2017 – July 2022 is 1.4%.

 

Field duplicate performance for the period October 2017 – 2019 showed a relatively poor correlation between duplicate sample pairs with only 34% of samples occurring within 20% RPD. Based on these results the QP formed the opinion that that mineralization is heterogenous, that sample errors are occurring during the sampling process, or a combination of both factors. The QP recommended further work to confirm whether the friable nature of silver sulphosalts might have resulted in loss of portions of the mineralized veins during the core cutting and sampling process, resulting in progressive decrease in sample grade with each stage of processing, and an overall net underestimation of metal.

 

The results of the field duplicate performance for the period 2021 – July 2022 is presented using RPD and scatter plots shown in Figure 11.8 and a statistical comparison is presented in Table 11.9. The duplicate data ranges from 0.01 ppm – 1,540 Ag ppm, with a mean of 14.27 Ag ppm. There are 643 samples greater than 15 times the detection limit, which provides a reasonable sample size from which to make an assessment. The duplicates cover the appropriate grade range.

 

amcconsultants.com121

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 11.8 Silver Sand field duplicate RPD and scatter plot (2021 – July 2022)

 

 

Note: the scatterplot is limited to 500 Ag ppm, only 2 samples in the dataset are above 500 Ag ppm.

Source: Compiled by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.  

 

 

Table 11.9 Silver sand field duplicate statistical summary (2021 – July 2022)

 

Ag (ppm) Original Duplicate
Number of samples 805 805
Number of samples > 15 times detection limit 643 643
Mean 14.27 13.69
Maximum 1,525.00 1,540.00
Minimum 0.01 0.01
Pop Std Dev. 70.58 72.46
CV 4.95 5.29
Cor Coeff 0.94 -
Bias (all data) 4.05% -
Percent Samples <20% RPD 54.90 -

 

Source: Compiled by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

The QP notes that the performance of the field duplicates has improved significantly since 2019, although still showing poor precision. There is a slight bias towards the original sample.

 

Coarse reject duplicates

 

Submission rates for the coarse reject duplicates is approximately 4%, noting that these were only submitted between 2021 and July 2022. The QP considers the insertion rate to be reasonable.

 

The results of the coarse reject duplicate performance for the period 2021 – July 2022 is presented using RPD and scatter plots shown in Figure 11.9 and a statistical comparison is presented in Table 11.10. The duplicate data ranges from 0.01 ppm – 2,090 Ag ppm, with a mean of 19.42 Ag ppm. There are 634 samples greater than 15 times the detection limit, which provides a reasonable sample size from which to make an assessment. The duplicates cover the appropriate grade range.

 

amcconsultants.com122

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 11.9 Silver Sand coarse reject duplicate RPD and scatter plot (2021 – July 2022)

 

 

Note: the scatterplot is limited to 500 Ag ppm, only 3 samples in the dataset are above 500 Ag ppm.

Source: Compiled by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

Table 11.10 Silver sand coarse reject duplicate statistical summary (2021 – July 2022)

 

Ag (ppm) Original Duplicate
Number of samples 794 796
Number of samples > 15 times detection limit 634 634
Mean 19.42 19.81
Maximum 1,970.00 2,090.00
Minimum 0.01 0.01
Pop Std Dev. 99.36 102.78
CV 5.12 5.19
Cor Coeff 1.00  
Bias (all data) -1.98%  
Percent Samples <15% RPD 93.38  

 

Source: Compiled by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

The QP notes that the coarse reject performance is acceptable, with > 90% within 15% RPD. There is a slight negative bias towards the original sample.

 

Pulp duplicates

 

Submission rates for the pulp duplicates is just below 4%, noting that these were only submitted between 2021 and July 2022.

 

The results of the pulp duplicate performance for the period 2021 – July 2022 is presented using RPD and scatter plots shown in Figure 11.10 and a statistical comparison is presented in Table 11.11. The duplicate data ranges from 0.01 ppm – 2,060 Ag ppm, with a mean of 25.23 Ag ppm.

 

amcconsultants.com123

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

There are 595 samples greater than 15 times the detection limit, which provides a reasonable sample size from which to make an assessment. The duplicates cover the appropriate grade range.

 

Figure 11.10 Silver Sand pulp duplicate RPD and scatter plot (2021 – July 2022)

 

 

Source: Compiled by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

Table 11.11 Silver Sand pulp duplicate statistical summary (2021 – July 2022)

 

Ag (ppm) Original Duplicate
Number of samples 735 737
Number of samples > 15 times detection limit 595 595
Mean 25.23 22.86
Maximum 2,060.00 2,060.00
Minimum 0.01 0.01
Pop Std Dev. 145.60 127.79
CV 5.77 5.59
Cor Coeff 0.89  
Bias (all data) 9.39%  
Percent Samples < 10% RPD 86.22  

 

Source: Compiled by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

The QP notes that 86% of samples fall within 10% RPD. This shows good precision. There is a bias towards the original samples of approximately 9%. There is an outlying sample, where the original value is 1,875 Ag ppm and the duplicate value is 64.7 Ag ppm. Removing this sample reduces the bias to -0.47% and the mean of the original samples to 22.71 Ag ppm. As such, the QP does not consider there to be any bias between the original and duplicate samples.

 

11.5.3.3Recommendations

 

The QP notes that the field duplicates, which monitor the variance of original field sampling (core cutting), coarse reject sub-sampling, and pulp sub-sampling, show sub-optimal precision. The coarse and pulp duplicates show good analytical precision. This suggests that the majority of

 

amcconsultants.com124

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

sampling variance is occurring during the initial sampling process. This may indicate that the quarter core sample is insufficient because of geological heterogeneity at this scale.

 

·Implement investigative work to understand the geological variance. This should include:

¾In future programs consider submitting field duplicates as half core rather than quarter core to assess sub-sampling error.
 ¾Consider drilling twin holes using triple tube diamond core or RC drilling to evaluate the deposit variance on a local scale and whether loss of vein material is occurring during drilling and sampling processes.

·Ensure that all future programs include between 4 - 5% duplicate samples including field duplicates, coarse reject duplicates and pulp duplicates to enable the various stages of sub-sampling to be monitored.

 

11.5.4Umpire samples

 

New Pacific submitted a total of 2,851 coarse reject samples to Actlabs Skyline in Lima, Peru for check assay analysis during October 2017 - 2019. Actlabs Skyline is an independent geochemical laboratory certified according to ISO 9001:2015.

 

The QP compared the original and umpire duplicate assays for 2,064 sample pairs where the original and duplicate assay were 15 times the detection limit of 1 g/t Ag. These showed no sample bias and sub-optimal precision with only 62% of umpire duplicates being within 10% RPD. The sub-optimal performance may be due to additional sub-sampling variance incurred during sampling of the reject or issues with the laboratory.

 

No umpire samples were submitted from 2020 – July 2022.

 

The QP makes the following recommendations regarding umpire samples:

 

·In future programs, submit umpire duplicates, as was done for the October 2017 - 2019 programs.
·Submit pulp samples (rather than coarse reject) so that umpire samples only monitor analytical accuracy and variance.
·Include CRMs at the average grade and higher grades in umpire sample submissions.

 

11.6Conclusions

 

New Pacific has developed and implemented sound procedures which manage sample preparation, analytical and security procedures.

 

Drilling programs completed on the Property between 2017 and July 2022 have included QA/QC monitoring programs which have incorporated the insertion of CRMs, blanks, and duplicates into the sample streams, and umpire (check) assays at a separate laboratory. The QP has compiled and reviewed the available QA/QC data for 556 drillholes where assays have been received.

 

New Pacific has included CRMs, blank, coarse reject, and pulp duplicate assays as part of routine analysis at slightly less than the preferred rates of 5% for the CRMs and blanks. Duplicate insertion rates are acceptable at 3%.

 

New Pacific has used four different CRMs throughout the project history. CRMs generally show reasonable analytical accuracy; however, one of the three CRMs did not perform within certified control limits, with an excessive number of failures. The QP postulates that poor CRM performance might be due to the CRMs being certified using a four-acid digest but analyzed using aqua-regia. The QP recommends that follow up work be completed prior to further use of these CRMs.

 

amcconsultants.com125

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Blank sample results are considered acceptable and show that no significant contamination has occurred during sample preparation and analysis.

 

Quarter core field duplicate samples show improved, yet sub-optimal performance which suggest that mineralization is heterogenous, that sample errors are occurring during the sampling process, or a combination of both factors. The good performance of the coarse and pulp duplicates submitted in 2021 – July 2022 indicates that the majority of variance is occurring at the initial sampling stage. This should be investigated.

 

The QP recommends that umpire samples be submitted as pulps in future QA/QC programs.

 

The QP has reviewed the QA/QC procedures used by New Pacific including certified reference materials, blank, duplicate and umpire data and has made some recommendations. The QP does not consider these to have a material impact on the Mineral Resource estimate and considers the assay database to be adequate for Mineral Resource estimation. The QP considers sample preparation, security, and analytical procedures employed by New Pacific to be adequate.

 

amcconsultants.com126

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

12Data verification

 

Dinara Nussipakynova, P.Geo. of BBA, formerly employed with AMC Consultants, completed a site visit to the Project between 28 – 29 May 2022, and during the inspection the following activities were carried out:

 

·Review of field site of Silver Sand project.

·Review of drilling and core processing procedures.

·Review of New Pacific QA/QC procedures.

·Review of randomly selected core from seven drillholes:

¾DSS5423

¾DSS487502

¾DSS504510

¾DSS527506

¾DSS527510

¾DSS529001

¾DSS646001

·Inspected the core processing facility and core storage in Betanzos.

·Held discussions with several staff on site, in regard to data collection and quality.

·Held discussions on database management procedures.

·Observed the marked and identified collars of the recent drillholes in the field.

·Reviewed the drill management process adopted by New Pacific.

 

As reported in the 2020 Technical Report, the QP undertook random cross-checks of assay results in the database with original assay results on the assay certificates returned from ALS (Bolivia) and Actlabs (Peru) up to 31 December 2019. This verification consisted of comparing 3,616 of the 58,420 assay results in the database to those in the certificates. This is approximately 6.2% of the total samples at that time. One typing error was detected. The QP also undertook a random cross check of the original collar and survey measurements for 18 drillholes and compared them to the database. This represented 5.5% of the total drillholes. No errors were detected.

 

After the 2022 site visit, the QP undertook random cross-checks of assay results of the 2020 - 2022 drillholes with original assay results on the assay certificates returned from ALS (Bolivia) and Actlabs (Peru). This verification consisted of comparing 270 of the 5,198 assay results in the database to those in the certificates. This is approximately 5.2% of the total samples. One typing error was detected. No errors were detected.

 

As shown in Table 12.1 a total of 6.1% of the assays have been checked.

 

Table 12.1Assay verification results

 

Report Total samples # Samples selected for
verification
Errors noted % Samples
verified
2020 Technical Report 58,420 3,616 1 6.2
2022 Technical Report 5,198 270 1 5.2
Total 63,618 3,886 2 6.1

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.com127

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The drillhole file has undergone the following checks:

 

·Inconsistent FROM and TO values.

·Incorrect treatment of absent assay values.

·Duplicate records and duplicate holes.

·Downhole surveys.

·Drillhole collar elevation not matching topography wireframe.

·556 drillholes were reviewed in 3D space and these had a total of 91,164 records.

 

No inconsistencies were identified during checking the drillholes in 3D. Checking the collar locations against the Digital Terrain Model (DTM) of the topography surface showed no differences in elevation.

 

The QP considers the database fit-for-purpose and in the QP’s opinion, the geological data provided by New Pacific for the purposes of Mineral Resource estimation were collected in line with industry best practice as defined in the CIM Exploration Best Practice Guidelines and the CIM Mineral Resource, Mineral Reserve Best Practice Guidelines. As such, the data are adequate for use in the estimation of Mineral Resources.

 

amcconsultants.com128

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

13Mineral processing and metallurgical testing

 

13.1Introduction

 

A number of metallurgical testwork programs were carried out previously by SGS Lima and SGS Lakefield involving mineralogy, comminution, whole ore cyanide leaching, flotation concentrate cyanide leaching, bulk flotation, column cyanide leaching, dense medium separation, and ore sorting. The results of these early metallurgical testwork programs have been reviewed and summarized in the reports listed below. During the studies conducted to support the Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) in 2022, whole ore cyanide leaching with silver doré as a final product was chosen as a preferred processing option to further advance Silver Sand project.

 

·AMC Consultants, NI 43-101 Technical Report, Silver Sand Deposit Preliminary Economic Assessment, New Pacific Metals Corp, 30 November 2022.

·AMC Consultants, NI 43-101 Technical Report, Silver Sand Deposit Mineral Resource Report, New Pacific Metals Corp, 16 January 2020.

·Andy Holloway, Metallurgical Program, Silver Sand Project, Q4 2020 – Q2 2021, SGS Lima, Peru, July 2021.

·Ruijin Jiang, Andy Holloway and Alex Zhang, NI 43-101 Technical Report, Silver Sand Project, Potosi, Bolivia, 31 August 2019.

·SGS Lakefield, An Investigation into Mineralogical Characterization of Three Silver Feed Samples from Bolivia, Project 18131-01, 27 August 2020.

·SGS Lima, Metallurgical Tests Service by Cyanide Leaching for the Assessment of Silver Minerals, Project Silver Sand – Phase I, Project# Cz. MET 0285-2018 MIN, May 2019.

·SGS Lima, Metallurgical Report for New Pacific Metals Corp, August 2019.

·SGS Lima, Metallurgical Tests Services of Comminution, Floating and Leaching for the Evaluation of Silver Ores, Silver Sand Project, Project# Cz. MET 0169-2020 MIN, July 2021.

 

To support the current Pre-feasibility Study (PFS), 16 new composite samples from the oxidized domain, transitional domain, and sulphide domain were identified, collected, composited, and tested for the whole ore cyanide leaching process. Furthermore, two PEA program high-grade samples from the transitional domain and sulphide domain, which previously resulted in lower silver recovery from the whole ore cyanide leaching flowsheet, were re-investigated to improve silver recovery. From the set of 18 composite samples, some were selected for other metallurgical characterization testwork, including comminution, mineralogy, cyanide destruction, slurry thickening, slurry rheology, slurry filtration, and transportable moisture limit determination. The impact of activated carbon and gravity concentration on silver recovery were also investigated. Silver loading on activated carbon and reduction of dissolved silver using zinc dust (the Merrill Crowe process) were completed as well. Eight additional reports have been issued to document these metallurgical testwork programs:

 

·ALS Metallurgy Kamloops, Comminution Testwork on Composites from the Silver Sand Project, New Pacific Metals Corp, KM 6875, 8 February 2023.

·ALS Metallurgy Kamloops, Pre-Feasibility Study Metallurgical Testing for the Silver Sand Project, Bolivia, New Pacific Metals Corp, KM6855, 13 July 2023.

·ALS Metallurgy Perth, Merrill Crowe Testing, Report No. A24428, July 2023.

·Bureau Veritas Minerals / Metallurgical, Metallurgical Testing for Silver Recovery, New Pacific Metals – Silver Sand Project, Project No. 2201508, 28 October 2022.

·JKTech, SMC Test Report Silver Sand, JKTech Job No 23017/P1, January 2023.

·Kemetco Research, Cyanide Detoxification Study, Project R0703, 31 May 2023.

·Pocock Industrial, Flocculant Screening, Gravity Sedimentation, Slurry Rheology and Pressure Filtration, PI2404, May 2023.

 

amcconsultants.com129

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

·SGS Burnaby, TML Report Analysis, report reference 0000025992, 31 May 2023.

 

13.2Historical testwork (2019-2021)

 

The report of “SGS Lakefield, An Investigation into Mineralogical Characterization of Three Silver Feed Samples from Bolivia, Project 18131-01, 27 August 2020” involved three samples (106~121 g/t silver) from the oxidized, transitional and sulphide domains for determination of bulk mineralogy with focus on silver minerals. The contents of bulk minerals were 84.8~89.1% quartz, 3.1~4.9% mica / chlorite / clay, 0.7~6.4% iron oxide, 0.1~7.2% pyrite, and 0.1~0.29% Pb-Bi-Sb-Cu sulfosalts. Silver minerals from these three samples are summarized as follows:

 

·For the sample from the oxidized domain, chlorargyrite (AgCl) and argentite (Ag2S) were the main silver minerals. The combined amount of AgCl and Ag2S accounted for 97% silver. Silver was also identified in minor amounts in various oxidized sulfosalts.

·For the sample from the transitional domain, the combined amount of AgCl and Ag2S accounted for 94% silver. A small amount of silver was present as tetrahedrite and argentojarosite AgFe3(SO4)2(OH)6. A minor amount of silver was present in various oxidized sulfosalts.

·For the sample from the sulphide domain, the amount of Ag2S accounted for 52% silver, followed by 35% silver associated with tetrahedrite and 13% silver associated with various Pb-Bi-Sb-Cu sulfosalts.

 

The report of “SGS Lima, Metallurgical Tests Service by Cyanide Leaching for the Assessment of Silver Minerals, Project Silver Sand – Phase I, Project# Cz. MET 0285-2018 MIN, May 2019” involved four samples, of which, two samples (28 g/t silver and 0.15% sulphur for one sample, and 122 g/t silver and 0.21% sulphur for another sample) from the oxidized domain, one sample (157 g/t silver and 1.45% sulphur) from the transitional domain and one sample (122 g/t silver and 2.12% sulphur) from the sulphide domain. Bottle roll cyanide leaching tests were carried out under the conditions of grind size (80% passing) 50~105 µm, cyanide concentration of 0.5~4.0 g/L NaCN, air or oxygen sparging, ambient or elevated temperature (60°C), pH 10.5~11.0 and 72-hour retention time. Finer grind size, higher cyanide concentration, oxygen sparging and elevated temperature all improved silver dissolution; however, copper dissolution and cyanide consumption also increased under these conditions.

 

The report of “SGS Lima, Metallurgical Report for New Pacific Metals Corp, August 2019” included the following scope of work:

 

·Ore characterization (size-by-size silver assays, mineralogical analysis, mineral liberation and association by QEMSCAN), bulk mineralogy, silver deportment, dense medium separation for 12 samples, of which, four samples from the oxidized domain, four samples from the transitional domain, and four samples from the sulphide domain.

·Comminution testing (crusher work index, Ball Mill Work Index, Abrasion Index) for seven samples, of which, three samples from the oxidized domain, two samples from the transitional domain, and two samples from the sulphide domain.

·Bulk flotation under the conditions of grind size (80% passing) 74~105 µm, natural pH to pH 9.0, collectors (PAX, SIPX, OX100, DANA468) for three samples, of which, one sample (201 g/t silver + 0.15% sulphur) from the oxidized domain, one sample (123 g/t silver + 1.16% sulphur) from the transitional domain, and one sample (123 g/t silver + 1.88% sulphur) from the sulphide domain.

 

amcconsultants.com130

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

·Bottle roll cyanide leaching under the conditions of grind size (80% passing) 50~105 µm, cyanide concentration of 1.0~4.0 g/L NaCN, air or oxygen, ambient or elevated temperature (57°C) and 72-hour retention time for four samples, of which, two samples (29 g/t silver + 0.15% sulphur for one sample, 132 g/t silver + 0.21% sulphur for another sample) from the oxidized domain, one sample (157 g/t silver + 1.45% sulphur) from the transitional domain and one sample (124 g/t silver + 2.13% sulphur) from the sulphide domain.

·Column cyanide leaching under the conditions of crush size 100% passing 12.7 mm, cyanide concentration of 4.0 g/L NaCN and 75-day irrigation for two samples (29 g/t silver + 0.15% sulphur for one sample and 132 g/t silver + 0.21% sulphur for another sample) from the oxidized domain.

 

The report of “SGS Lima, Metallurgical Tests Services of Comminution, Floating and Leaching for the Evaluation of Silver Ores, Silver Sand Project, Project# Cz. MET 0169-2020 MIN, July 2021”, involved a total of nine samples which were composited using core intervals of four metallurgical drillholes. The concentration of silver and sulphur in the samples is presented in Table 13.1.

 

Table 13.1 Chemical analysis results of silver ore samples

 

Sample Silver (ppm) Sulphur (%) Copper (ppm)
LG individual oxide composite 28 0.09 86
HG individual oxide composite 157 0.12 104
LG individual fresh composite 19 2.58 345
HG individual fresh composite 385 2.62 1,418
LG individual transitional composite 33 0.92 265
HG individual transitional composite 306 1.73 202
Master oxide composite 91 0.10 89
Master fresh composite 119 2.60 595
Master transitional composite 113 1.16 236

 

Source: SGS Mineral Services (2021).

 

The scope of work for this program included:

 

·Size-by-size silver assays for three master samples from the oxidized, transitional, and sulphide domains.

·Dense medium separation at medium densities of 2.55, 2.60, 2.65, and 2.75 t/m3 for three master samples from the oxidized, transitional, and sulphide domains.

·Comminution testing (SMC Test®, Ball Mill Work Index, and Abrasion Index) for three master samples from the oxidized, transitional, and sulphide domains.

·Bulk flotation under the conditions of grind size (80% passing) 53~100 µm, collectors (PAX, SIPX, Aero407, AR7498) and natural pH ~ pH 8.5 for three samples from the oxidized domain, three samples from the transitional domain, and three samples from the sulphide domain.

·Bottle roll cyanide leaching under the conditions of grind size (80% passing) 53~100 µm, cyanide concentration of 1.0~3.0 g/L NaCN, pulp density of 45% solids, retention time of 48~72 hours, pH 10.5~11.0, lead nitrate addition of 0~0.30 kg/t, and air or oxygen sparging (7~15 ppm dissolved oxygen) for three samples from the oxidized domain, three samples from the transitional domain, and three samples from the sulphide domain.

·Cyanide leaching of three flotation concentrates from the oxidized, transitional, and sulphide domains.

 

amcconsultants.com131

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

·Column cyanide leaching under the conditions of crush size (100% passing) 12.7 mm, cyanide concentration of 0.60 g/L NaCN, pH 10.5 and 152-day irrigation for the master sample from the transitional domain.

·Cyanide destruction for three cyanide leach tailing samples from the oxidized, transitional, and sulphide domains.

 

13.3Recent metallurgical testwork (2022-2023)

 

13.3.1Testwork scope

 

During the study of PEA in 2022, the whole ore cyanide leaching process with a silver doré final product was chosen as a preferred processing option. As such, the scope of the metallurgical testwork in support of PFS was focused on the cyanide leaching process.

 

16 new composite samples from the oxidized, transitional, and sulphide domains and two previous high-grade samples from the transitional and sulphide domains were investigated for cyanide leaching to determine silver recovery. One significant discovery out of the recent metallurgical testwork was related to the impact of cyanide leaching reactor on silver recovery and cyanide consumption. The impact of activated carbon on silver recovery was inconclusive.

 

All of these 18 composite samples were tested for cyanide leaching. Of these 18 composite samples, 15 samples were used for specific gravity measurement and a few samples were used for mineralogy, cyanide destruction, slurry thickening, slurry rheology, slurry filtration, transportable moisture limit, and tailing environmental testing. The impacts of activated carbon and gravity concentration on silver recovery were also investigated. Silver loading on activated carbon and reduction of dissolved silver using zinc dust (Merrill Crowe process) were completed as well.

 

13.3.2Sample selection and head assay

 

A significant number of mineralized intervals were selected across multiple drillholes in the major mineralization zones of the deposit to prepare 18 individual samples. These individual samples were grouped on the basis of oxidation extent and head grade (Table 13.1). From these 18 individual samples, 16 composite samples were prepared for use in the cyanide leaching tests (see Table 13.2).

 

amcconsultants.com132

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 13.2 18 individual samples prepared using the coarse assay rejects

 

Sample

ID

Type of

material

Location in the

deposit

Head

grade

Number of

drillholes

Total length of

intervals (metre)

Sample 3

 

 

 

Oxidized
material

 

Upper half deposit

(<100 m)

149 g/t Ag 22 77.1
Sample 3A 1,101 g/t Ag 4 5.7
Sample 3B 26 g/t Ag 7 17.8
Sample 4

 

Lower half deposit

(>100 m)

115 g/t Ag 18 86.2
Sample 4A 381 g/t Ag 5 5.6
Sample 4B 29 g/t Ag 8 17.8
Sample 6

 

 

 

Transitional
material

Entire deposit 

38 g/t Ag 24 34.5
Sample 7

 

Upper half deposit

(<100 m)

146 g/t 40 142.8
Sample 7A 1,145 g/t 5 5.8
Sample 7B 28 g/t Ag 19 35.3
Sample 8

 

Lower half deposit

(>100 m)

145 g/t Ag 26 142.3
Sample 8A 1,187 g/t Ag 5 5.8
Sample 8B 27 g/t Ag 15 37.9
Sample 11

 

 

Sulphide
material

 

Entire deposit

146 g/t Ag 26 110.9
Sample 11A 1,048 g/t Ag 4 5.7
Sample 11B 27 g/t Ag 16 26.6
Sample 12

Lower half deposit

(>150 m)

33 g/t Ag 11 27.9
Sample 13 682 g/t Ag 11 24.8

 

Two life-of-mine (LOM) composite samples were prepared:

 

·The first LOM composite sample, which is labelled as “Met Sample 1”, consisted of 10% material from the oxidized domain, 80% material from the transitional domain, and 10% material from the sulphide domain with a targeted head grade of 130 g/t silver.

·The second LOM composite sample, which is labelled as “Met Sample 1 NEW”, consisted of 10% material from the oxidized domain, 65% material from the transitional domain, and 25% material from the sulphide domain with a targeted head grade of 113 g/t silver.

 

In the oxidized domain, four composite samples were prepared:

 

·The first sample, which is labelled as “Met Sample 2”, was composited with the mineralized intervals from the entire deposit to target a head grade of 130 g/t silver.

·The second sample, which is labelled as “Met Sample 3”, was composited with the mineralized intervals from the upper half deposit in depths up to 100 metres to target a head grade of 130 g/t silver.

·The third sample, which is labelled as “Met Sample 4”, was composited with the mineralized intervals from the lower half deposit in depths greater than 100 metres to target a head grade of 130 g/t silver.

·The fourth sample, which is labelled as “Met Sample 3B:4B”, was composited with the mineralized intervals from the entire deposit to target a head grade of 35 g/t silver.

 

amcconsultants.com133

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 13.3 16 composite samples prepared for cyanide leaching tests

 

Sample ID Type of material

Location in the
deposit

Head grade Met Sample
1
Met Sample
1 NEW
Met Sample
2
Met Sample
3
Met Sample
3B:4B
Met Sample
4
Met Sample
5
Met Sample
6
Met Sample
7
Met Sample
8
Met Sample
9
Met Sample
10
Met Sample
11
Met Sample
11B
Met Sample
12
Met Sample
13
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
Sample 3 Oxidized material

Upper half deposit

(<100 m)

149 g/t Ag 4.3 3.9 49.0 84.5 50.0           12.6          
Sample 3A 1,101 g/t Ag          
Sample 3B 26 g/t Ag 0.7 1.1 1.0 15.5 2.4
Sample 4

Lower half deposit

(>100 m)

115 g/t Ag 4.3 3.9 49.0   50.0 94.5           13.6        
Sample 4A 381 g/t Ag       5.5  
Sample 4B 29 g/t Ag 0.7 1.1 1.0   1.4
Sample 6 Transitional material Entire deposit 38 g/t Ag   18.0           100                
Sample 7

Upper half deposit

(<100 m)

146 g/t 34.5 20.4         43.5   86.5   73.5          
Sample 7A 1,145 g/t          
Sample 7B 28 g/t Ag 5.5 3.1 6.5 13.5 11.5
Sample 8

Lower half deposit

(>100 m)

145 g/t Ag 34.5 20.4         43.5     87.0   77.1        
Sample 8A 1,187 g/t Ag          
Sample 8B 27 g/t Ag 5.5 3.1 6.5 13.0 7.9
Sample 11 Sulphide material Entire deposit 146 g/t Ag 10.0 13.8                     86.0 100    
Sample 11A 1,048 g/t Ag    
Sample 11B 27 g/t Ag 6.7 14.0
Sample 12

Lower half deposit

(>150 m)

33 g/t Ag   4.5                         100 100
Sample 13 682 g/t Ag

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com134

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

In the transitional domain, five composite samples were prepared:

 

·The first sample, which is labelled as “Met Sample 5”, was composited with the mineralized intervals from the entire deposit to target a head grade of 130 g/t silver.

·The second sample, which is labelled as “Met Sample 7”, was composited with the mineralized intervals from the upper half deposit in depths up to 100 metres to target a head grade of 130 g/t silver.

·The third sample, which is labelled as “Met Sample 8”, was composited with the mineralized intervals from the lower half deposit in depths greater than 100 metres to target a head grade of 130 g/t silver.

·The fourth sample, which is labelled as “Met Sample 6”, was composited with the mineralized intervals from the entire deposit to target a head grade of 35 g/t silver.

·The fifth sample, which is labelled as “Met Sample 14”, was a previous high-grade sample, which resulted in less than 80% silver recovery from cyanide leaching tests in 2020. This composite sample was prepared with the 114.5 metres intervals from the four metallurgical drillholes of DSS422501T, DSS522501T, DSS525021T, and DSS642501T.

 

Between the oxidized domain and transitional domain, two composite samples were prepared:

 

·The first sample, which is labelled as “Met Sample 9”, was made up of 15% material from the oxidized domain and 85% material from the transitional domain with the mineralized intervals selected in the upper half deposit at depths up to 100 metres to target a head grade of 130 g/t silver.

·The second sample, which is labelled as “Met Sample 10”, was made up of 15% material from the oxidized domain and 85% material from the transitional domain with the mineralized intervals selected in the lower half deposit at depths greater than 100 metres to target a head grade of 130 g/t silver.

 

In the sulphide domain, five composite samples were prepared:

 

·The first sample, which is labelled as “Met Sample 11”, was composited with the mineralized intervals from the entire deposit to target a head grade of 130 g/t silver.

·The second sample, which is labelled as “Met Sample 12”, was composited with the mineralized intervals from the deposit in depths greater than 150 metres to target a head grade of 35 g/t silver.

·The third sample, which is labelled as “Met Sample 13”, was composited with the mineralized intervals from the deposit in depths greater than 150 metres to target a head grade of 682 g/t silver.

·The fourth sample, which is labelled as “Met Sample 11B”, was composited with the mineralized intervals from the entire deposit to target a head grade of 35 g/t silver.

·The fifth sample, which is labelled as “Met Sample 15”, was a previous high-grade sample, which resulted in less than 80% silver recovery from the cyanide leaching tests in 2020. This composite sample was prepared with the 23.3 metres intervals from the four metallurgical drillholes of DSS422501T, DSS522501T, DSS525021T, and DSS642501T.

 

Table 13.3 shows the compositions of these 18 composite samples. In general, the samples from the oxidized domain contained a lower level of sulphur, while the samples from the sulphide domain contained a higher level of sulphur. The content of mercury was below 0.08 ppm in all cases. The content of gold was less than 0.06 ppm. However, the content of copper was elevated. Some of the copper is expected to dissolve during cyanide leaching.

 

amcconsultants.com135

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Cyanide leaching testwork data showed that average copper dissolution during cyanide leaching was approximately 40% on average for the materials from the oxidized domain, 60% on average for the materials from the transitional domain, and 70% on average for the materials from the sulphide domain. For those two LOM composite samples, copper dissolution during cyanide leaching was 57% on average.

 

amcconsultants.com136

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 13.4 Compositions of key elements for the 18 composite samples used in the cyanide leaching tests

 

Type of sample Sample ID Description Ag
(ppm)
Au
(ppm)
S
(%)
Cu
(ppm)
Pb
%
Zn
%
Hg
(ppm)
As
(ppm)
LOM composite sample Met Sample 1 10% oxide + 80% transitional + 10% sulphide 138 0.02 1.64 303 0.10 0.03 0.05 413
Met Sample 1 NEW 10% oxide + 65% transitional + 25% sulphide 114 <0.01 1.56 279 0.08 0.05 0.05 330

Oxidized sample

Met Sample 2 Entire deposit 138 0.02 0.31 187 0.10 0.01 0.04 294
Met Sample 3 Upper half deposit (<100 m) 149 0.02 0.37 105 0.11 0.00 0.05 242
Met Sample 3B:4B Low-grade 36 0.01 0.22 83 0.12 0.01 0.03 250
Met Sample 4 Lower half deposit (>100 m) 140 0.02 0.22 278 0.17 0.02 0.03 420

Transitional sample

Met Sample 5 Entire deposit 142 0.02 1.59 271 0.10 0.04 0.04 425
Met Sample 6 Low-grade 43 0.01 1.55 163 0.05 0.04 0.03 234
Met Sample 7 Upper half deposit (<100 m) 139 0.02 1.70 317 0.07 0.02 0.07 316
Met Sample 8 Lower half deposit (>100 m) 154 0.02 1.52 230 0.12 0.03 0.02 513
Met Sample 14 High-grade from year 2020 400 0.03 1.84 226 0.13 0.01 0.06 546
Oxidized / transitional composite sample Met Sample 9 15% oxide + 85% transitional (<100 m) 140 0.02 1.64 277 0.07 0.02 0.07 328
Met Sample 10 15% oxide + 85% transitional (>100 m) 153 0.02 1.28 203 0.12 0.04 0.02 484

Sulphide sample

Met Sample 11 Entire deposit 152 0.02 2.44 643 0.09 0.12 0.03 377
Met Sample 11B Low-grade 31 0.01 1.55 232 0.01 0.03 0.01 165
Met Sample 12 Low-grade (>150 m) 53 0.01 1.72 131 0.10 0.22 0.02 182
Met Sample 13 High-grade (>150 m) 714 0.05 3.08 1,438 0.16 0.36 0.06 657
Met Sample 15 High-grade from year 2020 418 0.04 3.10 1,359 0.11 0.04 0.04 567

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com137

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

13.3.3Mineralogical measurement

 

X-ray diffraction (XRD) was conducted on five samples using a quantitative method while QEMSCAN particle mineral analysis (PMA) was conducted on another three samples. XRD uses mineral structures to identify minerals, while QEMSCAN uses element peak intensities to distinguish minerals. Mineral identification by XRD is superior for some minerals; however, mineral contents measured by QEMSCAN PMA have a significantly better accuracy. The mineral content data are summarized in Table 13.4, Figure 13.1, Figure 13.2, and Figure 13.3.

 

Pyrite was a dominant sulphide mineral in all samples between 0.5% and 6.2%. Met Sample 2 (the sample from the oxidized domain) had significantly less pyrite than other samples. Copper sulphide, silver mineral, sphalerite and galena were also measured. Non-sulphide gangue minerals were mainly quartz or mica mineral (primarily muscovite). These non-sulphide minerals are not expected to interfere with silver extraction during cyanide leaching.

 

For two samples from the sulphide domain, namely, Met Sample 13 and Met Sample 15, silver was mostly contained in the silver copper sulphide minerals, such as tetrahedrite and freibergite. The remaining silver for these two samples was almost entirely acanthite (Ag2S).

 

Ag2S was a dominant silver mineral in Met Sample 9 (15% oxide + 85% transitional), accounting for about 74% silver. Only about 14% silver in this sample was in silver copper sulphide (including tetrahedrite, freibergite, and CuSbAgFeS) and the remainder was in silver halide. These silver minerals are not expected to cause problems with silver recovery during cyanide leaching.

 

Copper was associated with a number of copper sulphide minerals. On average, about 35% copper was associated with chalcopyrite. The copper minerals other than chalcopyrite are expected to be partially soluble in cyanide solution. The buildup of dissolved copper in the process water is therefore to be expected.

 

Table 13.5 Contents of minerals in the six mineralized samples

 

 

 

 

Mineral

Met Sample
2
Met Sample
5
Met Sample
9
Met Sample
11
Met Sample
13
Met Sample
15

 

Oxidized
sample

 

Transitional
sample

15%

oxidized +
85%

transitional

 

Sulphide
sample

High-grade
sulphide
sample
2020 High-
grade sulphide
sample
XRD XRD PMA XRD PMA XRD PMA XRD
Ag/Cu/Pb sulphide mineral     0.3   1.0   1.3  
Sphalerite     <0.1   0.5   <0.1  
Pyrite 0.5 3.0 2.5 4.7 4.8 6.2 5.4 6.2
Quartz 89.7 88.7 90.3 85.8 85.1 81.7 85.4 84.7
Mica (muscovite) 8.8 7.4 2.7 8.7 6.0 11.5 5.6 8.2
Iron oxide 1.0 0.8 2.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.9
Feldspar     0.3   0.3   0.4  
Titanium mineral     0.2   0.3   0.3  
Kandite group     0.1   0.2   0.1  
Others     0.8   1.0   0.9  

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com138

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 13.1 Silver deportment in Met Sample 9 (15% oxide + 85% transitional), Met Sample 13 (high-grade sulphide sample), and Met Sample 15 (2020 high-grade sulphide sample)

 

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

Figure 13.2 Copper deportment in Met Sample 9 (15% oxide + 85% transitional), Met Sample 13 (high-grade sulphide sample), and Met Sample 15 (2020 high-grade sulphide sample)

 

 

Note: Chalcopyrite includes stannite.

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com139

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 13.3 Sulphur deportment in Met Sample 9 (15% oxide + 85% transitional), Met Sample 13 (high-grade sulphide sample), and Met Sample 15 (2020 high-grade sulphide sample)

 

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

13.3.4Specific gravity

 

One LOM composite sample, two blended samples between the oxidized domain and transitional domain, three samples from the oxidized domain, five samples from the transitional domain, and four samples from the sulphide domain were subjected to the measurement of specific gravity. The measured specific gravity values are summarized in Table 13.6 varying between 2.64 t/m3 and 2.73 t/m3 with average 2.69 t/m3.

 

amcconsultants.com140

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 13.6 Specific gravity values of the 15 samples used in cyanide leaching tests

 

Type of sample Sample ID Sample description Specific gravity
(t/m3)
LOM composite sample Met Sample 1

10% oxide + 80% transitional + 10%

sulphide

2.66

 

 

Oxidized sample

Met Sample 2 Entire deposit 2.72
Met Sample 3 Upper half deposit (<100 m) 2.71
Met Sample 4 Lower half deposit (>100 m) 2.73
Average 2.72

 

 

 

Transitional sample

Met Sample 5 Entire deposit 2.72
Met Sample 6 Low-grade 2.69
Met Sample 7 Upper half deposit (<100 m) 2.72
Met Sample 8 Lower half deposit (>100 m) 2.69
Met Sample 14 High-grade from year 2020 2.68
Average 2.70

 

Oxidized / transitional composite sample

Met Sample 9 15% oxide + 85% transitional (<100 m) 2.69
Met Sample 10 15% oxide + 85% transitional (>100 m) 2.64
Average 2.67

 

 

 

Sulphide sample

Met Sample 11 Entire deposit 2.66
Met Sample 12 Low-grade (>150 m) 2.65
Met Sample 13 High-grade (>150 m) 2.68
Met Sample 15 High-grade from year 2020 2.70
Average 2.67
Global average 2.69

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

13.3.5Comminution testing

 

Three composite samples were prepared using the quarter core intervals from the drillholes in the oxidized domain, transitional domain, and sulphide domain in Table 13.7. The composite sample from the oxidized domain consisted of 28 intervals from 18 drillholes. The composite sample from the transitional domain consisted of 27 intervals from 20 drillholes. The composite sample from the sulphide domain was made up of 27 intervals from 19 drillholes.

 

Table 13.7 Number of drillholes, intervals and sample weights for the composite samples used for the comminution testing

 

    Oxide
sample
Transitional
sample
Sulphide sample
Number of drillholes selected   18 20 19
Number of intervals selected   28 27 27
Combined length of intervals m 33.9 32.8 31.3
Combined weight of selected 1/4 core intervals kg 57.2 54.0 56.3
Expected silver content g/t 130 133 131

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

The comminution testing included SMC Test®, rod mill work index, ball mill work index, and abrasion index. The results of comminution testing are summarized in Table 13.8. The SAG circuit specific energy (SCSE) value was derived from the simulations of a standard circuit comprising a SAG mill in a closed circuit with a pebble crusher. The value of Axb is a measure of resistance to

 

amcconsultants.com141

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

impact breakage. A high value of Axb means a soft material, whilst a low value means a hard material.

 

Table 13.8 Comminution testing results

 

  Oxide
sample
Transitional
sample
Sulphide
sample
  Specific gravity   t/m3 2.48 2.57 2.57
Parameters derived A     83.1 76.6 72.6
b   0.62 0.56 0.67
from SMC Test®    
results ta     0.54 0.43 0.49
(26.5~31.5 mm)    
A x b   51.5 42.9 48.6
  SCSE   kWh/t 8.7 9.4 8.9

 

 

Measurement of Rod Mill Work Index

Feed size 100% passing µm 12,500 12,500 12,500
80% passing 8,613 8,284 8,858
Product size 100% passing µm 1,180 1,180 1,180
80% passing 751 764 752
Rod Mill Work Index kWh/t 6.6 7.8 6.9

 

 

Measurement of Ball Mill Work Index

Feed size 100% passing µm 1,866 2,172 2,010
80% passing 3,350 3,350 3,350
Product size 100% passing µm 106 106 106
80% passing 88 86 90
Ball Mill Work Index kWh/t 16.4 14.5 14.9
Abrasion Index (12.7~19.0 mm) g 0.245 0.278 0.294

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

The SMC tests were conducted on the particles sized between 26.5 and 31.5 mm. The Axb value derived from the SMC tests ranged from 42.9 to 51.5. On this basis, these samples are classified as average or medium hardness in terms of the SAG milling. The SCSE values were between 8.7 and 9.4 kWh/t.

 

The rod mill work index values were between 6.6 and 7.8 kWh/t. Based on these values, these samples are categorized as very soft with regards to the rod milling.

 

The results from the Bond ball mill work index tests were between 14.5 and 16.4 kWh/t. Based on these values, these samples are characterized as average hardness with regards to the ball milling.

 

The abrasion index values ranged between 0.245 to 0.294 g. These samples are classified as moderately abrasive.

 

13.3.6Bottle roll cyanide leaching tests by Bureau Veritas Mineral / Metallurgy

 

Fifteen bottle roll cyanide leaching tests were completed by Bureau Veritas Minerals / Metallurgy in Richmond, British Columbia, Canada. The grinding was carried out in a stainless-steel mill with stainless steel rods at natural pH using 1.0 kg sample charges. The targeted grind size was 80% passing 75 µm. After grinding, the slurry pulp density was adjusted to 40% solids, and then 0.30 kg/t lead nitrate was added.

 

After the slurry pH was adjusted to 10.5~11.0 using lime, a 4 hour pre-aeration process was carried out under continuous oxygen sparging to target over 15 ppm dissolved oxygen in the solution. Then, sodium cyanide was added to the aerated slurry to reach 3.0 g/L NaCN

 

amcconsultants.com142

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

concentration, followed by 54-hour cyanide leaching in the absence of activated carbon under continuous oxygen sparging to maintain over 15 ppm dissolved oxygen.

 

After completion of the 54-hour cyanide leaching, activated carbon was added to the slurry to reach 30 g/L concentration and cyanide leaching, carbon in pulp (CIP) was continued for another 18 hours while oxygen sparging was maintained. The data on silver recovery, cyanide consumption, and lime consumption are presented in Table 13.9 and Table 13.10.

 

amcconsultants.com143

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 13.9 Silver recovery, cyanide consumption, and lime consumption from the bottle roll cyanide leaching tests carried out by Bureau Veritas Mineral / Metallurgy

 

 

Type of sample

 

Sample ID

 

Sample description

 

Back calcd. head grade (g/t)

Silver recovery Cyanide consumption Lime consumption

DCN

after 54 h

CIP

+18 h

DCN

after 54 h

CIP

+18 h

 
% kg/t NaCN kg/t Ca(OH)2
LOM composite Met Sample 1 10% oxide + 80% transitional + 10% sulphide 137 92.6 94.4 3.39 6.24 1.6

 

 

Oxidized sample

Met Sample 2 Entire deposit 132 91.1 93.4 2.72 5.55 1.5
Met Sample 3 Upper half deposit (<100 m) 148 91.1 90.9 2.95 5.85 1.4
Met Sample 4 Lower half deposit (>100 m) 137 93.6 95.7 2.24 4.99 1.6
Average 91.9 93.3 2.64 5.46 1.5

 

 

 

Transitional sample

Met Sample 5 Entire deposit 141 93.5 95.2 3.24 6.16 1.6
Met Sample 6 Low-grade 41 88.7 90.5 2.98 5.99 1.6
Met Sample 7 Upper half deposit (<100 m) 135 93.4 95.0 3.62 6.45 1.4
Met Sample 8 Lower half deposit (>100 m) 142 94.3 95.2 3.05 5.90 1.6
Met Sample 14 High-grade from year 2020 399 94.1 96.1 3.39 6.07 1.7
Average 92.8 94.4 3.26 6.11 1.6

 

Oxidized / Transitional sample

Met Sample 9 15% oxidized + 85% transitional (<100 m) 133 91.9 94.2 2.87 5.77 1.6
Met Sample 10 15% oxidized + 85% transitional (>100 m) 159 92.2 95.1 2.78 5.33 1.7
Average 92.1 94.7 2.82 5.55 1.7

 

 

 

Sulphide sample

Met Sample 11 Entire deposit 159 70.1 82.2 3.59 6.31 1.4
Met Sample 12 Low-grade (>150 m) 59 47.4 93.3 3.16 5.93 1.5
Met Sample 13 High-grade (>150 m) 703 66.5 73.1 4.99 7.46 1.5
Met Sample 15 High-grade from year 2020 440 63.7 80.4 4.72 7.52 1.6
Average 61.9 82.3 4.12 6.81 1.5

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com144

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The LOM composite sample (Met Sample 1) achieved 94.4% silver recovery. As a group average, final silver recovery was 93.3% for the samples from the oxidized domain (Met Samples 2, 3, and 4), 94.4% for the samples from the transitional domain (Met Samples 5~8 and 14) and 82.3% for the samples from the sulphide domain (Met Samples 11~13 and 15). The blended samples between the oxidized domain and transitional domain (Met Samples 9 and 10) achieved 94.7% silver recovery. The final tail residues from each of these fifteen cyanide-leaching tests were subsequently re-assayed by ALS Metallurgy in Kamloops, and the accuracy of silver assays by Bureau Veritas for these tail solids have been verified.

 

amcconsultants.com145

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 13.10 Group average silver recovery and impact of activated carbon on silver recovery

 

 

Type of sample

 

Sample ID

 

Sample description

 

Head grade

Silver recovery

CIP recovery
minus

DCN recovery

54-h DCN 54-h DCN + 18-h CIP
Individual Average Individual Average
g/t % % %
LOM composite Met Sample 1 10% oxide + 80% transitional + 10% sulphide 137 92.6   94.4   1.8

 

Oxidized sample

Met Sample 2 Entire deposit 132 91.1

 

91.9

93.4

 

93.3

2.3
Met Sample 3 Upper half deposit (<100 m) 148 91.1 90.9

-0.2

2.1

Met Sample 4 Lower half deposit (>100 m) 137 93.6 95.7

 

 

Transitional sample

Met Sample 5 Entire deposit 141 93.5

 

 

 

92.8

95.2

 

 

 

94.4

1.7
Met Sample 6 Low-grade 41 88.7 90.5 1.8
Met Sample 7 Upper half deposit (<100 m) 135 93.4 95.0 1.6
Met Sample 8 Lower half deposit (>100 m) 142 94.3 95.2 0.9
Met Sample 14 High-grade from year 2020 399 94.1 96.1 2.0
Oxidized / transitional
composite sample
Met Sample 9 15% oxidized + 85% transitional (<100 m) 133 91.9 92.1 94.2 94.7 2.3
Met Sample 10 15% oxidized + 85% transitional (>100 m) 159 92.2 95.1 2.9

 

 

Sulphide sample

Met Sample 11 Entire deposit 159 70.1

 

 

61.9

82.2

 

 

82.3

12.1
Met Sample 12 Low-grade (>150 m) 59 47.4 93.3 45.9
Met Sample 13 High-grade (>150 m) 703 66.5 73.1 6.6
Met Sample 15 High-grade from year 2020 440 63.7 80.4 16.7

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp (2024).

 

amcconsultants.com146

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

An important observation of these fifteen cyanide leaching tests was the increase of silver recovery after the addition of activated carbon. The silver recovery increase was relatively modest for the samples from the oxidized domain and transitional domain; however, this increase was significant for the samples from the sulphide domain. Probably, the high-level sulphide minerals in these samples might be able to adsorb the dissolved silver, a phenomenon known as preg-robbing or preg borrowing. However, this phenomenon was not observed in subsequent testwork by ALS Metallurgy in Kamloops.

 

Cyanide consumptions from these fifteen cyanide leaching tests were relatively high, especially after the addition of activated carbon. It is suspected that a portion of cyanide in the solution was lost to the atmosphere due to excessive oxygen gas sparging. Also, the activated carbon might have adsorbed a significant amount of cyanide. Some cyanide was also lost to the solution samples taken for assays, and this loss was estimated to be around 0.20 kg/t NaCN. Figure 13.4 shows cyanide consumption as a function of sulphur content in the feed before activated carbon was added (at the end of the 54-hour cyanide leaching in the absence of activated carbon) and after activated carbon was added (at the end of the 54-hour DCN plus 18-hour CIP). It can be seen that the higher level of sulphide minerals in the feed consumed more cyanide.

 

Figure 13.4 Cyanide consumption as a function of sulphur content in the feed

 

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com147

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 13.11 Copper dissolution during 72-hour cyanide leaching

 

 

Type of Sample

 

Sample ID

 

Sample description

Head

grade

(g/t)

Copper

dissolution

(%)

LOM composite Met Sample 1 10% oxide + 80% transitional + 10% sulphide 303 90

 

 

Oxidized sample

Met Sample 2 Entire deposit 187 51
Met Sample 3 Upper half deposit (<100 m) 105 31
Met Sample 4 Lower half deposit (>100 m) 278 59
Average 47

 

 

 

Transitional sample

Met Sample 5 Entire deposit 271 88
Met Sample 6 Low-grade 163 56
Met Sample 7 Upper half deposit (<100 m) 317 95
Met Sample 8 Lower half deposit (>100 m) 230 61
Met Sample 14 High-grade from year 2020 226 65
Average 73

 

Oxidized / transitional composite sample

Met Sample 9 15% oxidized + 85% transitional (<100 m) 277 87
Met Sample 10 15% oxidized + 85% transitional (>100 m) 203 74
Average 80

 

 

 

Sulphide sample

Met Sample 11 Entire deposit 643 71
Met Sample 12 Low-grade (>150 m) 131 83
Met Sample 13 High-grade (>150 m) 1,438 87
Met Sample 15 High-grade from year 2020 1,359 83
Average 81
Global average 72

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

A significant amount of copper was dissolved during cyanide leaching. There was a positive correlation between copper dissolution and cyanide consumption Figure 13.5. For the LOM composite sample (Met Sample 1), copper dissolution reached 90%. As a group average, copper dissolution was 47% for the samples from the oxidized domain, 73% for the samples from the transitional domain, and 81% for the samples from the sulphide domain. For the blended samples between the oxidized domain and transitional domain, copper dissolution reached 80%. Such elevated copper dissolution is expected to be problematic for the future commercial operations because it results in an accumulation of dissolved copper in the process water. The high-level dissolved copper may interfere with silver reduction using zinc dust in the Merrill Crowe circuit.

 

amcconsultants.com148

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 13.5 Relationship between copper dissolution and cyanide consumption

 

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

13.3.7Cyanide leaching tests by ALS in Metallurgy Kamloops

 

After Bureau Veritas Mineral / Metallurgy laboratory was closed permanently in September 2002, all remaining cyanide leaching tests were moved to ALS Metallurgy in Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada. Three types of leaching reactor, namely smooth bottle, mechanically agitated tank, and lifterbottle, were used and their performances were compared. Oxygen sparging was intermittent for the initial cyanide leaching tests. For all subsequent cyanide leaching tests, oxygen sparging was continuous with a controlled flowrate. Most cyanide leaching tests were carried out for the following four samples (a limited number of cyanide leaching tests were conducted for other samples):

 

·The first sample was Met Sample 1, which consisted of 10% oxide, 80% transitional, and 10% sulphide with a head grade of 138 g/t silver.

·The second sample was Met Sample 1 NEW, which consisted of 10% oxide, 65% transitional, and 25% sulphide with a head grade of 114 g/t silver.

·The third sample was Met Sample 9, which was made up of 15% oxide and 85% transitional with a head grade of 140 g/t silver.

·The fourth sample was Met Sample 15 with a head grade of 418 g/t silver. This sample was a high-grade sample from the sulphide domain and resulted in less than 80% silver recovery when subjected to cyanide leaching tests in 2020.

 

amcconsultants.com149

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Grinding was carried out in a mild steel mill with stainless steel rods. Lime was added to the grinding mill. The investigated parameters included lead nitrate addition, cyanide concentration, leaching retention time, pulp density, grind size, pre-aeration, mild steel mill vs rubber-lined steel mill, air sparging vs oxygen sparging, intermittent oxygen sparging vs continuous oxygen sparging, oxygen sparging flowrate, bottle roller speed, small bottle vs large bottle, activated carbon addition and gravity concentration.

 

As noted during the earlier Bureau Veritas Mineral / Metallurgy work, ALS Metallurgy Kamloops also observed a significant increase of cyanide consumption after addition of activated carbon. Among the three types of reactors, silver recovery in the mechanically agitated tank was increased due to improved mixing, but cyanide consumption was higher. It is suspected that a considerable amount of air was entrained from the surface into the slurry in the mechanically agitated tank due to strong vortex on the surface. When the entrained air escaped, some cyanide was lost. If the strong vortex on the surface is prevented, cyanide consumption in a mechanically agitated tank is expected to come down significantly. This hypothesis has been verified by ALS Metallurgy Perth who achieved less than 1.0 kg/t NaCN cyanide consumption on Met Sample 1 in a mechanically agitated tank. When cyanide leaching was carried out in a smooth bottle, cyanide consumption was lower, but silver recovery was reduced due to lower levels of agitation. In comparison, the lifterbottle produced the best overall results with respect to silver recovery and cyanide consumption.

 

13.3.7.1Met Sample 1 NEW

 

Met Sample 1 NEW consisted of 10% material from the oxidized domain, 65% material from the transitional domain, and 25% material from the sulphide domain with a head grade of 114 g/t. This sample represents an average mill feed for the LOM production. Six cyanide leaching tests were completed and the results are presented in Table 13.12. For each cyanide leach test, a number of solution samples were taken for silver assays. Each removed solution sample was then supplemented by adding the tap water at a same volume to the leaching reactor. The amount of cyanide in these solution samples was included in the cyanide consumption reported by the laboratory. For the cyanide consumption numbers in Table 13.12, the amount of cyanide in these solution samples has been credited.

 

Table 13.12 Cyanide leaching results for Met Sample 1 NEW in a lifterbottle

 

 

Test ID

Sparged gas

Cyanide
concentration

(g/L NaCN)

Lead
nitrate

(kg/t)

Back calcd.
head grade
(g/t)

Silver recovery

(%)

Cyanide
consumption

(kg/t NaCN)

Lime
consumption
(kg/t CaO)

Type Flowrate (mL/min)
72CN Oxygen 19

 

 

2.00

 

 

/

111 89.2 1.16 1.3
73CN Oxygen 9 113 89.4 0.99 1.0
74CN Air 19 121 89.6 0.94 1.6
75CN Oxygen 38 114 90.6 0.96 1.3
78CN Oxygen 19 3.00 / 111 91.0 1.37 2.2
79CN Oxygen 19 2.00 0.20 116 88.0 1.18 1.3
Average 114 89.6 1.10 1.4

 

Note: 72 hour, without activated carbon, 1.0 kg solid, pulp density of 45% solids, grind size 80% passing ~75 µm, pH ~11.0.

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com150

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The results in Table 13.12 indicate that oxygen sparging flowrate and lead nitrate did not affect the final silver recovery. Also, the final silver recovery with air sparing was as good as silver recovery with oxygen sparging, although initial silver leaching rates were superior with oxygen. Nevertheless, oxygen sparging is still considered in the process plant design due to the high elevation (and low partial pressure) at the mine site and also the faster silver dissolution rate. On average, silver recovery was 89.6%, cyanide consumption was 1.10 kg/t NaCN, and lime consumption was 1.4 kg/t CaO. The copper content of Met Sample 1 NEW was 300 ppm and on average, copper dissolution from these six cyanide leaching tests was 56%.

 

As a comparison, two cyanide leaching tests were carried out in a mechanically agitated tank, and the results are presented in Table 13.13. Silver recovery was 89.6% at pulp density of 41% solids. This silver recovery is comparable to what was achieved in a lifterbottle. However, when pulp density was increased to 45% solids, silver recovery dropped slightly to 87.7%. Based on cyanide consumption figures (3.13 kg/t NaCN at pulp density of 41% solids and 1.12 kg/t NaCN at pulp density of 45% solids), slurry mixing at the higher density was probably not as vigorous and the lower silver recovery was likely a result of poor mixing.

 

Table 13.13 Cyanide leaching results for Met Sample 1 NEW in a mechanically agitated tank

 

 

Test ID

Sparged gas

Pulp
density

(% solid)

Cyanide
concentration

(g/L NaCN)

Back calcd.
head grade

(g/t)

Silver
recovery

(%)

Cyanide
consumption

(kg/t NaCN)

Lime
consumption

(kg/t CaO)

Type Flowrate (mL/min)
77CN Oxygen 19 41 2.00 105 89.6 3.13 2.2
81CN 45 118 87.7 1.12 2.0

 

Note: 72 hours, without activated carbon, 1.0 kg solid, pulp density of 45% solids, grind size 80% passing ~75 µm, pH ~11.0, continuous oxygen sparging at 19 mL/min.

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

13.3.7.2Met Sample 1

 

Met Sample 1 consisted of 10% material from the oxidized domain, 80% material from the transitional domain, and 10% material from the sulphide domain at a head grade of 145 g/t. This sample represented an average mill feed for the LOM production before the open pit was optimized. Four cyanide leaching tests were carried out in a lifterbottle, and the results are presented in Table 13.14. On average, silver recovery was 92.7%, cyanide consumption was 1.40 kg/t NaCN, and lime consumption was 1.6 kg/t CaO. The loss of cyanide to the solution samples taken for assays has been credited for the cyanide consumption numbers in Table 13.14. Copper content of Met Sample 1 was 303 ppm. Average copper dissolution from these four cyanide leaching tests was 60%.

 

Table 13.14 Cyanide leaching results for Met Sample 1 in a lifterbottle

 

 

Test ID

Pulp
density
(% solid)

Cyanide
concentration

(g/L NaCN)

Lead

nitrate
(kg/t)

Retention

time
(h)

Back calcd.

head grade
(g/t)

Silver

recovery

(%)

Cyanide
consumption
(kg/t NaCN)

Lime

consumption
(kg/t CaO)

28CN 40 3.00 0.30 72 133 92.3 1.62 1.8
38CN 40 3.00 0.30 48 138 92.0 1.23 1.5
48CN 40 3.00 0.30 48 153 92.7 1.67 1.7
66CN 45 2.00 / 72 157 93.8 1.08 1.4
Average   145 92.7 1.40 1.6

 

Note: 1.0 kg solid, grind size 80% passing ~75 µm, pH ~11.0, oxygen sparging at 19 mL/min.
Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

Comparing the results for tests with higher cyanide concentration and a shorter retention time and those with lower cyanide concentration and a longer retention time, the latter is thought to have

 

amcconsultants.com151

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

superior economic because cyanide is one of the most significant contributors to the operating cost. The results in Table 13.14 once again confirmed that lead nitrate did not appear to improve silver recovery and thus it was dropped from further testing.

 

A number of cyanide leaching tests were carried out in a mechanically agitated tank. Three types of cyanide leaching tests were carried out, namely:

 

·DCN stands for direct cyanide leach, which means that cyanide leaching was carried out in the absence of activated carbon.

·CIP stands for carbon in pulp, which means that cyanide leaching was started in the absence of activated carbon, and after 54 hours of leaching, activated carbon was added to reach 30 g/L concentration in the slurry and then cyanide leaching was continued for another 18 hours.

·CIL stands for carbon in leach, which means that cyanide leaching was started in the presence of activated carbon.

 

Nine cyanide leaching tests were conducted by ALS Metallurgy in Kamloops and one cyanide leaching test was completed by ALS Metallurgy in Perth. The results from these ten cyanide leaching tests are presented in Table 13.15. Under the conditions of 40% solids pulp density, 1.50~3.0 g/L NaCN cyanide concentration and 72 hours retention time (54-hour DCN + 18-hour CIP), average silver recovery was 92.4%, average cyanide consumption was 2.67 kg/t NaCN where the loss of cyanide to the solution samples has been credited, and average lime consumption was 1.7 kg/t CaO. This average silver recovery (92.4%) was similar to 92.2% silver recovery (Test 15CN) obtained in the absence of activated carbon. When cyanide concentration was reduced to 1.0 g/L NaCN (Test 19CN), silver recovery decreased to 87.1%. When cyanide concentration was increased to 2.0 g/L NaCN (Test 23CN), silver recovery was 90.4%. It is suspected that slurry mixing was probably somewhat compromised when pulp density was increased to 45% solids.

 

amcconsultants.com152

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 13.15 Cyanide leaching results for Met Sample 1 in a mechanically agitated tank

 

 

 

Laboratory

 

 

Type of
leach

 

 

Test
ID

 

Pulp
density

 

Oxygen
flowrate

 

Cyanide concentration

 

Lead
nitrate

 

Retention
time

 

Back calcd. 
head
grade

 

Silver
recovery

 

Cyanide

consumption

 

Lime
consumption

% solid mL/min g/L NaCN kg/t h g/t % kg/t NaCN kg/t CaO

 

 

 

 

 

ALS Kamloops

DCN 15CN 40 19 3.00 0.30 72 129 92.2 3.15 1.3
34CN 2.00 / 48 148 89.6 1.99 1.7

 

 

 

CIP

04CN

 

 

40

 

 

19

3.00 0.30

 

 

72

145 93.7 3.49 1.5
21CN 2.00 0.20 129 92.0 2.51 1.8
25CN 2.00 / 147 92.5 2.72 1.6
30CN 1.50 / 154 91.6 1.95 2.0
Average 144 92.4 2.67 1.7
Global average         91.9 2.64 1.6
CIP 19CN 45 19 1.00 / 72 123 87.1 1.68 2.2
23CN 2.00 138 90.4 2.84 1.5
CIL 35CN 40 19 2.00 / 72 152 92.5 3.37 1.6
ALS Perth DCN JR7660 40 no 2.00 / 48 133 91.2 0.83 1.9

 

Note: 1.0 kg solid, grind size 80% passing ~75 µm, continuous oxygen sparging, pH ~11.0.

 

amcconsultants.com153

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

ALS Metallurgy in Perth completed one cyanide leaching test in a mechanically agitated tank to generate the pregnant leach solution for Merrill Crowe testing. Silver recovery was 91.2%, which is similar to what was achieved by ALS Metallurgy in Kamloops. However, cyanide consumption from ALS Metallurgy in Perth was much lower. ALS Metallurgy in Perth used a baffled tank and a Rushton agitator. Probably, the slurry vortex on the surface in the tank was modest and thus a minimal amount of air was entrained into the slurry.

 

Copper content in Met Sample 1 was 303 ppm. Copper dissolution was 58% on average based on nine cyanide leaching tests by ALS Metallurgy in Kamloops, and 62% based on one cyanide leaching test by ALS Metallurgy in Perth.

 

amcconsultants.com154

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 13.16 Cyanide leaching results for Met Sample 1 in a smooth bottle

 

 

Oxygen
sparging

Bottle
size

 

Type of
leach

Test
ID
Grind size
(80%)
Cyanide
concentration
Lead
nitrate
Back calcd.
head grade
Silver
recovery
Cyanide
consumption
Lime
consumption
µm g/L NaCN kg/t g/t % kg/t NaCN kg/t CaO

 

 

 

 

 

19 mL/min continuous

 

 

 

 

 

Small bottle

 

 

 

 

CIP

01CN 74

 

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

0.30

143 90.0 0.22 1.0
03CN 74 143 91.9 1.92 1.6
05CN 74 138 89.8 1.53 1.1
12CN 74 134 90.8 1.62 2.2
13CN 48 135 90.5 1.77 2.5
14CN 75 136 91.0 2.01 1.5
Average 138 90.7 1.51 1.7
CIL 36CN 74 2.00 / 139 92.6 2.34 1.3
Large bottle DCN 29CN 74 3.00 0.30 146 89.4 4.27 2.3
Average 139 90.7 1.96 1.7

 

 

 

 

 

Intermittent oxygen sparging

 

 

 

 

 

 

Small bottle

 

 

 

CIP

07CN 74

 

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

0.30

137 90.2 1.41 1.4
08CN 74 142 88.8 1.58 1.3
09CN 50 143 91.5 1.51 1.4
10CN 75 144 89.5 1.60 1.4
11CN 75 143 90.0 1.56 1.0
Average 142 90.0 1.53 1.3

 

 

DCN

06CN

 

74

3.00

 

0.30

131 89.3 0.78 1.1
17CN 6.00 132 89.8 1.12 1.0
18CN 3.00 134 90.1 0.68 0.3
Average 89.8 1.13 0.9
Average 138 89.9 1.28 1.1
Global average 90.3 1.62 1.4

 

Note: 1.0 kg solid, pulp density 40% solids, oxygen sparging, ~ pH 11.0, 72-hour retention time.

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com155

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

A number of cyanide leaching tests were carried out in a smooth bottle under different conditions. The conditions and results are presented in Table 13.16. With continuous oxygen sparging at 19 mL/min, six cyanide leaching tests were conducted for a 72-hour retention time, in which activated carbon was added after 54 hours of leaching. Average silver recovery was 90.7% along with average 1.51 kg/t NaCN cyanide consumption and average 1.7 kg/t CaO lime consumption. Grind size finer than 74 µm did not increase silver recovery. When a large bottle was used (Test 29CN), silver recovery was not increased. However, cyanide consumption in a large bottle increased significantly to 4.27 kg/t. Due to the larger slurry surface area in the larger bottle, it is thought that the amount of cyanide lost to the atmosphere was increased. When activated carbon was added in the very beginning, i.e., the CIL, silver recovery increased to 92.6%. However, cyanide consumption also increased to 2.34 kg/t NaCN. The loss of cyanide to the solution samples taken for assays has been credited for this cyanide consumption value.

 

With intermittent oxygen sparging to the headspace inside the bottle, five cyanide leaching tests were conducted for a 72-hour retention time, in which activated carbon was added after 54 hours of leaching. Average silver recovery was 90.0% along with average 1.53 kg/t NaCN cyanide consumption and average 1.3 kg/t CaO lime consumption. These numbers are similar to those with continuous oxygen sparging (90.7% silver recovery, 1.51 kg/t NaCN cyanide consumption, and 1.7 kg/t CaO lime consumption). In the absence of activated carbon, three cyanide leaching tests were completed, average silver recovery was 89.8% along with 1.13 kg/t NaCN cyanide consumption, and 0.9 kg/t CaO lime consumption.

 

As global averages from these 16 cyanide tests in a smooth bottle, silver recovery was 90.3%, cyanide consumption was 1.62 kg/t NaCN and lime consumption was 1.4 kg/t CaO. Compared with global averages (91.9% silver recovery, 2.64 kg/t NaCN cyanide consumption, 1.6 kg/t CaO lime consumption) in a mechanically agitated tank, silver recovery was 1.6% lower; however, cyanide consumption was lower by 1.02 kg/t NaCN.

 

Copper content in Met Sample 1 was 303 ppm. Average copper dissolution was 57% under continuous oxygen sparging and 54% under intermittent oxygen sparging.

 

13.3.7.3Blended samples between the oxidized domain and the transitional domain

 

Two blended samples were composited between the oxidized domain and the transitional domain at a ratio of 15% oxidized material and 85% transitional material. Met Sample 9 consisted of the intervals from the upper half deposit at depths up to 100 metres, while Met Sample 10 consisted of the intervals from the lower half deposit at depths greater than 100 metres.

 

amcconsultants.com156

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 13.17 Cyanide leaching results for Met Sample 9

 

 

 

Reactor

 

 

Type
of test

 

Cyanide
concentration

 

 

Test
ID

 

Pulp
density

 

Lead nitrate

Back calcd. head grade

 

Silver
recovery

 

Cyanide
consumption

 

Lime
consumption

g/L NaCN

%
solid

kg/t g/t % kg/t NaCN kg/t CaO

 

Lifterbottle

CIP 2.00 57CN 40 / 146 92.1 1.16 1.7
DCN 64CN 45 / 164 92.1 1.32 2.5
Average 155 92.1 1.24 2.1
Smooth bottle CIP 3.00 02CN 40 0.30 146 91.7 0.45 1.0

 

 

 

Mechanically agitated tank

 

 

 

CIP

1.00 20CN 45 / 137 88.8 1.84 2.0
1.50 31CN 40 / 144 92.0 2.11 1.6
  22CN 40 0.20 142 93.1 2.86 1.8
2.00 24CN 45 / 156 92.4 2.70 1.7
26CN 40 / 145 92.6 2.69 1.2
  Average 148 92.7 2.75 1.6
DCN 3.00 16CN 40 0.30 133 93.4 2.51 1.4

 

Note: 1.0 kg solid, grind size P80 ~75 µm, continuous oxygen sparging at 19 mL/min, pH ~11.0, 72-hour retention time

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

Table 13.17 shows the conditions and results for Met Sample 9. When cyanide leaching was carried out in a lifterbottle, average silver recovery was 92.1% and average cyanide consumption was 1.24 kg/t NaCN. The presence of activated carbon did not improve silver recovery under these conditions. When cyanide leaching was carried out in a smooth bottle (Test 02CN), silver recovery was 91.7%. In a mechanically agitated tank at 2.0 g/L NaCN cyanide concentration, average silver recovery was 92.7% and average cyanide consumption was 2.75 kg/t NaCN. The increase of silver recovery in a mechanically agitated tank was negligible, but cyanide consumption increased significantly, again likely due to the loss of cyanide to the atmosphere. Copper content in Met Sample 9 was 277 ppm and on average, copper dissolution was 65%.

 

For Met Sample 10, two cyanide leaching tests were carried out in a lifterbottle and three cyanide leaching tests were conducted in a mechanically agitated tank. The conditions and results are summarized in Table 13.18. With the lifterbottle, average silver recovery was 94.7% and average cyanide consumption was 1.02 kg/t NaCN. The presence of activated carbon did not increase silver recovery.

 

With the mechanically agitated tank, average silver recovery was 94.6% and average cyanide consumption was 2.62 kg/t NaCN. Cyanide consumption in a mechanically agitated tank increased more than 100% compared with the lifterbottle. Copper content in Met Sample 10 was 203 ppm and average copper dissolution was 64%.

 

amcconsultants.com157

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 13.18 Cyanide leaching results for Met Sample 10

 

 

Reactor

 

Type of
leach

 

Test

ID

Pulp
density
Cyanide
concentration
Back calcd.
head grade
Silver
recovery
Cyanide
consumption
Lime
consumption

%

solid

g/L NaCN g/t % kg/t NaCN kg/t CaO

 

Lifterbottle

CIP 58CN 40 2.00 143 95.1 0.89 1.3
DCN 65CN 45 164 94.3 1.15 1.6
Average 153 94.7 1.02 1.4

 

Mechanically
agitated tank

 

CIP

51CN 40 2.00 148 95.8 2.42 1.9
59CN 45 2.00 145 95.3 2.99 1.5
60CN 40 1.50 150 92.6 2.45 1.6
Average 148 94.6 2.62 1.6

 

Note: 1.0 kg solid, grind size P80 ~75 µm, continuous oxygen sparging at 19 mL/min, pH ~11.0, 72-hour retention time.

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

13.3.7.4Oxidized samples

 

Four samples were composited with the intervals selected from the oxidized domain. The first sample, labelled as Met Sample 2, was composited with the intervals across the entire deposit. The second sample, labelled as Met Sample 3, was made up with the intervals from the upper half of the deposit at depths less than 100 metres. The third sample, labelled as Met Sample 4, consisted of the intervals from the lower half of the deposit at depths greater than 100 metres. The fourth sample, labelled as Met Sample 3B:4B, contained the low-grade intervals.

 

Table 13.19 shows the cyanide leaching conditions and results. One cyanide leaching test was carried out in a lifterbottle for Met Sample 3. Silver recovery was 89.5% and cyanide consumption was 0.68 kg/t NaCN.

 

Three cyanide leaching tests were conducted in a mechanically agitated tank. For Met Sample 3, silver recovery was 89.9% and cyanide consumption was 2.22 kg/t NaCN. Compared with the lifterbottle test, silver recovery was similar, but cyanide consumption was more than doubled. For Met Sample 2, silver recovery was 91.2% and cyanide consumption was 2.00 kg/t NaCN. For Met Sample 4, silver recovery was 91.5% and cyanide consumption was 2.95 kg/t NaCN. The loss of cyanide to the solution samples taken for assays has been credited for these cyanide consumption numbers.

 

amcconsultants.com158

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 13.19 Cyanide leaching results for the oxidized samples

 

 

Reactor

 

Sample

ID

 

Sample

description

 

Test
ID

 

Type of
leach

Pulp
density

Back calc.
head grade
Silver
recovery
Cyanide
consumption
Lime
consumption
% solid g/t % kg/t NaCN kg/t CaO
Lifterbottle Met Sample 3 Upper half deposit (<100 m) 53CN CIP 40 162 89.5 0.68 1.6

 

Mechanically agitated tank

Met Sample 2 Entire deposit 39CN

 

CIP

 

40

141 91.2 2.00 1.6
Met Sample 3 Upper half deposit (<100 m) 40CN 142 89.9 2.22 1.3
Met Sample 4 Lower half deposit (>100 m) 41CN 139 91.5 2.95 1.3
Average 141 90.9 2.39 1.4
Lifterbottle Met Sample 3B:4B Low-grade 71CN DCN 45 29 78.3 0.39 1.4

 

Note: 1.0 kg solid, grind size P80 ~75 µm, continuous oxygen sparging at 19 mL/min, pH ~11.0, 72-hour retention time, 2.0 g/L NaCN.

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com159

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The low-grade sample (Met Sample 3B:4B) resulted in lower silver recovery at 78.3%. Considering cyanide consumption was only 0.39 kg/t NaCN, it would be beneficial to apply a higher cyanide concentration for this low-grade sample, because silver recovery at higher cyanide concentration may increase.

 

13.3.7.5Transitional samples

 

Five samples were composited with the intervals from the transitional domain. The first sample, labelled as Met Sample 5, consisted of the suitable intervals selected from the entire deposit. The second sample, labelled as Met Sample 6, was made up of the low-grade intervals. The third sample, labelled as Met Sample 7, contained the intervals from the upper half of the deposit at depths up to 100 metres. The fourth sample, labelled as Met Sample 8, consisted of the intervals from the lower half of the deposit at depths greater than 100 metres. The fifth sample, labelled as Met Sample 14, was a high-grade composite sample which resulted in less than 80% silver recovery in cyanide leaching during previous testing in 2020.

 

Table 13.20 shows the cyanide leaching conditions and results. When cyanide leaching was carried out in a mechanically agitated tank, average silver recovery for Met Samples 5, 7, and 8 was 92.8% along with average cyanide consumption of 2.62 kg/t NaCN. Despite less than 80% silver recovery from previous cyanide leaching tests, silver recovery of Met Sample 14 was 94.1%. Even for the low-grade sample (Met Sample 6), silver recovery was 94.1~94.6%. Therefore, all samples from the transitional domain worked well with respect to silver recovery during cyanide leaching.

 

amcconsultants.com160

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 13.20 Cyanide leaching results for the transitional samples

 

Reactor Sample
ID
Sample
description
Test
ID
Type of
leach
Pulp
density
Back calcd.
head grade
Silver
recovery
Cyanide
consumption
Lime
consumption
% solid g/t % kg/t NaCN kg/t CaO
Mechanically
agitated tank
Met Sample 5 Entire deposit 44CN CIP 40 146 92.5 2.17 1.8
Met Sample 7 Upper half deposit (<100 m) 46CN 142 92.2 3.41 1.4
Met Sample 8 Lower half deposit (>100 m) 50CN 168 93.8 2.29 1.8
Average 152 92.8 2.62 1.6
Mechanically
agitated tank
Met Sample 14 2020 high-grade 52CN CIP 40 393 94.1 3.48 1.4
Lifterbottle Met Sample 6 Low-grade 67CN DCN 45 42 94.6 0.62 1.7
Mechanically
agitated tank
45CN CIP 40 40 94.1 2.43 1.6

Note: 1.0 kg solid, grind size P80 ~75 µm, continuous oxygen sparging at 19 mL/min, pH ~11.0, 72-hour retention time, 2.0 g/L NaCN.
Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com161

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

13.3.7.6Sulphide samples

 

Five composite samples were created using the intervals from the sulphide domain. The first sample, labelled as Met Sample 11, consisted of the intervals selected across the entire deposit. The second sample, labelled as Met Sample 12, contained the low-grade intervals from the deposit at depths greater than 150 metres. The third sample, labelled as Met Sample 13, contained the high-grade intervals from the deposit at depths greater than 150 metres. The fourth sample, labelled as Met Sample 11B, consisted of the low-grade intervals. The fifth sample, labelled as Met Sample 15, was the high-grade composite sample from 2020 which resulted in less than 80% silver recovery in cyanide leaching tests from the previous metallurgical program.

 

amcconsultants.com162

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 13.21 Cyanide leaching results for the sulphide samples

 

Sample
ID
Sample
description

 

Reactor

Test
ID
Type of
leach
Grind size
(80%)
Pulp
density
Cyanide
concentration
Lead
nitrate
Back calcd.
head grade
Silver
recovery
Cyanide
consumption
Lime
consumption
µm % solid g/L NaCN kg/t g/t % kg/t NaCN kg/t CaO
Met Sample 11 Entire deposit Mechanically agitated tank 55CN CIP 30 40 6.00 0.60 146 80.8 5.22 1.3
Met Sample 13 High-grade (>150 m) 56CN CIP 30 40 6.00 0.60 717 77.1 9.10 1.4

 

Met Sample 15

 

2020 high-grade

Lifterbottle 49CN CIP 50

 

40

 

6.00

 

0.60

384 77.6 4.82 1.8
Mechanically agitated tank 37CN CIP 50 425 88.8 10.26 1.6
54CN 30 417 87.6 7.37 1.6
Average 82.4 7.35 1.5
Met Sample 12 Low-grade (>150 m) Lifterbottle 68CN DCN 75 45 2.00 / 42 86.4 0.78 1.8
Met Sample 11B Low-grade Lifterbottle 69CN DCN 75 45 2.00 / 31 84.4 1.07 1.8
70CN 33 86.0 0.83 1.0

Note: 1.0 kg solid, continuous oxygen sparging at 19 mL/min, ~pH 11.0, 72-hour retention time.
Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com163

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 13.21 shows the cyanide leaching conditions and results. For Met Sample 11, 13, and 15, average silver recovery was 82.4% and average cyanide consumption was 7.37 kg/t NaCN. Fine grinding up to 30 µm did not increase silver recovery (Test 54CN vs Test 37CN).

 

For the previous high-grade sample from 2020 (Met Sample 15), mixing intensity seemed important to silver recovery because silver recovery in a lifterbottle (Test 49CN) was about 10% lower compared with the mechanically agitated tank. It is worth noting that two low-grade samples (Met Sample 12 and 11B) achieved 84.4~86.0% silver recovery in a lifterbottle and cyanide consumption was 0.83~1.07 kg/t NaCN at grind size of 80% passing 75 µm and cyanide concentration of 2.0 g/L NaCN.

 

13.3.8Gravity concentration testing

 

The cyanide leaching results indicated that some silver minerals were refractory and might need ultra fine grinding to increase silver recovery during cyanide leach. Several preliminary gravity concentration tests were completed to recover silver-bearing heavy minerals. The recovered gravity concentrate was then reground and then leached in cyanide solution either on its own or together with the gravity tail.

 

13.3.8.1Gravity concentration testing for Met Sample 1 NEW

 

Only one gravity concentration test was completed for Met Sample 1 NEW, which consisted of 10% oxide, 65% transitional and 25% sulphide. Primary grind size was 80% passing 75 µm. The ground slurry was passed through a lab-scale Knelson centrifugal concentrator at a concentrate mass pull of 12.3%. The gravity concentrate was reground to 80% passing 16 µm. The reground gravity concentrate was then combined with the gravity tail, followed by cyanide leaching in a lifterbottle under the conditions of 45% solids pulp density, 2.0~3.0 g/L NaCN cyanide concentration, continuous oxygen sparging at 19 mL/min, pH ~11.0 and 72-hour retention time. Overall silver recovery was 93.9% and cyanide consumption was 1.58 kg/t NaCN. Compared with the results achieved without gravity concentration (89.6% silver recovery and 1.10 kg/t NaCN cyanide consumption), silver recovery increased by 3.9%, but cyanide consumption was also increased by 0.48 kg/t NaCN. Further investigation is warranted to increase silver recovery while reducing cyanide consumption.

 

13.3.8.2Gravity concentration testing for Met Sample 15

 

Met Sample 15, the previous high-grade sulphide sample from 2020 which resulted in less than 80% silver recovery, was subjected to three gravity concentration tests. The results are summarized in Table 13.22. Silver recovery varied from 19.8% to 42.6% and silver content in the gravity concentrate ranged from 1,218 g/t to 2,480 g/t.

 

Table 13.22 Gravity concentration results for Met Sample 15

 

Gravity concentration test no. Stream Mass (%) Silver content (g/t) Recovery (%)

27

Gravity concentrate 4.4 1,726 21.0
Gravity tail 95.6 296 79.0
Feed 100.0 358 100.0

42

Gravity concentrate 3.4 2,480 19.8
Gravity Tail 96.6 353 80.2
Feed 100.0 426 100.0

61

Gravity concentrate 16.1 1,218 42.6
Gravity tail 83.9 315 57.4
Feed 100.0 460 100.0

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com164

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

One gravity concentrate was subjected to cyanide leaching in a solution containing 10.0 g/L sodium cyanide without regrinding and silver recovery was only 52.2% (Table 13.24) The second gravity concentrate was reground to 80% passing 8 µm and then subjected to cyanide leaching in a solution containing 20.0 g/L sodium cyanide, and silver recovery was 99.5%. The third gravity concentrate was reground to 80% passing 16 µm, and then subjected to cyanide leaching in a solution containing 6.0 g/L sodium cyanide, and silver recovery was 99.0%. These results indicated clearly that fine grinding was necessary to enhance silver recovery when the gravity concentrate was subjected to cyanide leaching. It may be possible that the finely reground gravity concentrate may leach well even when cyanide concentration is reduced to 3.0 g/L NaCN. These results are presented in Table 13.23 and Table 13.24.

 

amcconsultants.com165

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 13.23 Cyanide leaching conditions for gravity concentrate and gravity tail for Met Sample 15

 

Gravity concentration test no. Stream Cyanide leach test no. Type of leach Reactor Particle size (P80) pH Cyanide concentration Lead nitrate Pulp density
µm g/L NaCN kg/t %

27

Gravity conc 33CN 24-h DCN Smooth bottle 74 12.0 10.0 0.30 18
Gravity tail 32CN 72-h DCN Mechanically agitated tank 74 11.2 3.0 0.30 40

42

Gravity conc 47CN 24-h DCN Mechanically agitated tank 8 12.0 20.0 0.50 10
Gravity tail 43CN 54-h DCN + 18-h CIP Lifterbottle 69 11.1 3.0 0.30 40
61 Gravity conc 62CN 72-h DCN Mechanically agitated tank 15 11.3 6.0 0.60 10
Gravity tail 63CN 54-h DCN + 18-h CIP 72 11.1 3.0 0.30 40

Note: Continuous oxygen sparging at 19 mL/min.
Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com166

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 13.24 Cyanide leaching results for gravity concentrate and gravity tail for Met Sample 15

 

Gravity concentration Cyanide leaching
Test
No.

Stream

Mass Silver
content
Recovery Test
No.
Silver
recovery
Cyanide
consumption
Lime consumption Caustic soda
consumption
% g/t % % kg/t NaCN kg/t CaO kg/t NaOH

27

Gravity conc 4.4 1,726 21.0 33CN 52.2 15.6 / 3.6
Gravity tail 95.6 296 79.0 32CN 79.8 6.2 1.1 /
Feed   358   Average 74.0 6.6 1.0 0.2

42

Gravity conc 3.4 2,480 19.8 47CN 99.5 61.5 / 54.4
Gravity tail 96.6 353 80.2 43CN 79.4 3.8 1.5 /
Feed   426   Average 83.4 5.8 1.4 1.9

61

Gravity conc 16.1 1,218 42.6 62CN 99.0 49.1 3.7 /
Gravity tail 83.9 315 57.4 63CN 92.5 4.7 1.0 /
Feed   460   Average 95.3 11.8 1.4 /

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com167

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

In comparing silver recoveries from cyanide leaching of the gravity tails, i.e., 79.8% for Test 32CN, 79.4% for Test 43CN, and 92.5% for Test 63CN, it is clear that adequate amounts of silver-bearing heavy minerals must be removed so that gravity tail at particle size of 80% passing 75 µm can achieve over 90% silver recovery from cyanide leaching.

 

Gravity concentration Test 61, cyanide leaching Test 62CN at 6.0 g/L NaCN cyanide concentration for the gravity concentrate, and cyanide leaching Test 63CN at 3.0 g/L NaCN cyanide concentration for the gravity tail have established a guideline to improve silver recovery for the materials from the sulphide domain. From 73.7% silver recovery obtained from cyanide leaching in 2020 to 95.3% silver recovery after gravity concentration and cyanide leaching were carried out together, this represents a significant performance improvement. Further optimization is warranted to reduce cyanide consumption while silver recovery is improved.

 

13.3.9Reduction of dissolved silver using zinc dust (Merrill Crowe)

 

Four preliminary tests were conducted by ALS Metallurgy in Perth, Australia to reduce the dissolved silver using zinc dust, i.e., the Merrill Crowe process. The Merrill Crowe zinc cementation process consisted of four steps:

 

·Clarify the pregnant leach solution to remove any fine suspended solids.
·Deaerate the clarified pregnant leach solution to reduce the dissolved oxygen to less than 1.0 ppm.
·Add the required amounts of lead nitrate and zinc dust.
·Collect the silver precipitate by filtration.

 

Table 13.25 Operating conditions and results of Merrill Crowe zinc cementation tests

 

  Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 4
JR7670 JR7712 JR7726 JR7765

 

 

 

Feed solution

Volume mL 150 197 150 150
Silver ppm 71.7 71.7 71.7 71.7
Copper ppm 110 110 110 110
Sodium Cyanide g/L ~1.03 ~1.03 ~1.03 1.03
pH   11.0 11.0 11.0 10.6
Zinc dust Weight g 0.0822 0.1191 0.0480 0.0480
Mass ratio Zn / (Ag+Cu) 3.02 4.32 1.76 1.76
De-aeration time min 240 240 240 240
Dissolved oxygen after de-aeration ppm <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
Temperature   °C 60 18 20 20
Lead nitrate Weight g 0.0131 0.0247 0.0767 0.0077
Pb(NO3)2 / Zn mass ratio 0.16 0.21 1.60 0.16
Retention time for Merrill Crowe min 20 50 15 15

Tail solution

Silver ppm 1.72 0.06 0.16 1.14
Copper ppm 23 111 109 112
pH   11.2 10.9 10.4 10.0
Sodium cyanide g/L 0.980 1.180 0.950 0.980
Recovery Silver % 97.6 99.9 99.8 98.4
Copper % 79.0 0.0 0.9 0.0
Cyanide consumption kg/m3 NaCN N/A N/A N/A 0.050

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com168

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The pregnant leach solution was generated by cyanide leaching Met Sample 1 (133 g/t silver and 303 g/t copper) in a mechanically agitated tank under the conditions of grind size 80% passing 75 µm, 40% solids, pH ~11.0 (adjusted with lime), 19 mL/min oxygen sparging, 2.0 g/L NaCN cyanide concentration and 48-hour retention time.

 

Silver recovery was 91.2% and copper dissolution was 57.8%. Reagent consumptions were 0.83 kg/t NaCN for sodium cyanide and 1.85 kg/t CaO for lime. The pregnant leach solution contained 71.7 ppm silver, 110 ppm copper, 15 ppm zinc, 16 ppm iron, 30 ppm potassium, and 1,266 ppm sodium.

 

Figure 13.6 Silver precipitation as a function of the ratio of zinc dust to the combined amount of dissolved silver and copper for Test 2 (JR7712)

 

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com169

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 13.7 Silver precipitation kinetics of Test 3 (JR7726) with single dosage of zinc dust

 

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

The Merrill Crowe zinc cementation operating conditions and results are presented in Table 13.25. Selective precipitation of silver was successful through the staged addition of zinc dust at ambient temperature. This indicates that preferential reduction of silver by zinc dust occurred at a lower dosage and at ambient temperature. The optimum mass ratio of zinc dust to the combined amount of silver plus copper was 1.76:1 (Figure 13.6). The requisite time to achieve maximum silver precipitation efficiency was around 6 minutes (Figure 13.7). Silver reduction efficiency was between 98.4% and 99.9%. At elevated temperature, copper co-precipitation occurred in Test 1 (JR7670).

 

Cyanide consumption was a focus of Test 4 (JR7765), because it was found that the starting cyanide concentration of 1.03 g/L NaCN was significantly lower than the assumed 1.93 g/L NaCN at the end of cyanide leaching. Cyanide consumption for Test 4 (JR7765) was 0.050 kg/m3 NaCN.

 

13.3.10Silver loading on the activated carbon

 

The pregnant leach solution from cyanide leaching test 34CN contained 82.2 ppm silver, 108 ppm copper, and 1.56 g/L sodium cyanide at pH 10.8. This pregnant leach solution was used to determine silver loading on the activated carbon. Six carbon concentrations were chosen.

 

amcconsultants.com170

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

For each carbon concentration, fresh activated carbon was contacted with the pregnant leach solution for 48 hours, and then the solution was assayed for silver and copper concentrations to determine the quantities of silver and copper that have been adsorbed onto the activated carbon. The carbon loading values were calculated from the solution silver and copper assays. Silver loading on carbon is shown in Figure 13.8 and copper loading on carbon is shown in Figure 13.9. Silver loading on carbon was relatively high and reached 15,627 g/t when the solution contained 14.5 ppm silver. When silver concentration in solution decreased to 1.03 ppm, silver loading on carbon was 2,811 g/t. Copper loading on carbon was relatively weak. The loaded copper on carbon is expected to be displaced by silver when high-level dissolved silver is present in solution.

 

Figure 13.8 Silver loading on the activated carbon

 

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com171

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 13.9 Copper loading on activated carbon

 

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

13.3.11Cyanide destruction

 

Preliminary cyanide destruction was tested in a continuous mode by Kemetco Research in Richmond, British Columbia, Canada. Four samples were tested individually, namely, Met Sample 1 (10% oxide + 80% transitional + 10% sulphide), Met Sample 2 (100% oxide), Met Sample 5 (100% transitional) and Met Sample 11 (100% sulphide). The feed slurries were prepared by ALS Metallurgy in Kamloops with grind size 80% passing around 75 µm. Upon receipt, cyanide leaching was carried out by Kemetco Research under the conditions of 40% solids, pH ~11.0 (adjusted with lime), 2.0 g/L NaCN cyanide concentration, continuous air sparging, and 54-hour DCN plus 18-hour CIP in a mechanically agitated tank. Results are presented in Table 13.26.

 

amcconsultants.com172

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 13.26 Results of cyanide leaching tests by Kemetco Research

 

  Met
Sample 1
Met
Sample 2
Met
Sample 5
Met
Sample 11

10% oxide +
80% transitional +

10% sulphide

100%
oxide

100%
transitional

100%

sulphide

Head grade

Assayed Silver g/t 127 123 130 125
Copper g/t 303 198 262 716
Back calculated Silver g/t 133 133 124 135
Copper g/t 304 213 246 679
Assayed tail grade Silver g/t 13.6 11.6 9.8 22.1
Copper g/t 134 133 103 288
Recovery Silver   % 89.8 95.8 92.1 83.3
Copper   % 56 38 58 58
Reagent consumption Sodium cyanide, NaCN kg/t 5.3 4.7 4.7 5.3
Lime, CaO   kg/t 0.51 0.38 0.26 0.63

Note: 20 kg solid, 40% solids, 2.0 g/L NaCN, pH ~11.0, 54-hour DCN plus 18-hour CIP, air sparging.
Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

The cyanide destruction experimental set-up comprised one reaction vessel with a working volume of 1.59 litres and equipped with a Rushton impeller, baffles, a dissolved oxygen probe, a pH probe and a sparger tube to introduce oxygen gas. In addition, chemical reagent tanks were required for sodium metabisulfite (Na2S2O5), copper sulfate (CuSO4·5H2O), and hydrated lime (Ca(OH)2). The chemical reagent solutions were added using peristaltic pumps. The oxygen flow was controlled with a pressure regulator, a needle valve and a rotameter.

 

The agitator speed was 600 rpm to ensure adequate mixing. Oxygen gas was added at a flowrate of 250 mL/min to maintain the dissolved oxygen in a desired range. For Met Sample 1, the retention time was initially 2.0 hours, and later on, was reduced to 1.5 hours. The retention time was 1.5 hours for Met Sample 2, Met Sample 5, and Met Sample 11. For all cyanide destruction tests, 3~4 displacements of the reactor volume were realized before representative samples were collected for chemical analysis.

 

amcconsultants.com173

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 13.27 Cyanide destruction operating conditions and results for Met Sample 1

 

Test 1 2 3 4 5
Retention time h 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5
Stream Before
detox
After
detox
Before
detox
After
detox
Before
detox
After
detox
Before
detox
After
detox
Before
detox
After
detox
pH 11.2 9.0 11.2 9.0 11.2 9.0 11.2 9.0 11.2 9.0
WAD cyanide CNWAD ppm 1,342 1.3 1,342 <1.0 1,342 <1.0 1,342 1.0 1,342 1.3
Total cyanide CNT ppm               1.4   1.8
Thiocyanate SCN ppm             118 89    
Silver Ag ppm 2.8 <0.1 2.8 <0.1 2.8 <0.1 2.8 <0.1 2.8 <0.1
Copper Cu ppm 106 0.5 106 0.4 106 0.3 106 0.3 106 0.7
Iron Fe ppm 34 0.1 34 0.2 34 0.5 34 0.7 34 0.7
Zinc Zn ppm 13 0.2 13 0.5 13 0.2 13 0.2 13 0.2

Chemical addition

Lime g/g Na2S2O5 0.38 0.38 0.40 0.32 0.34
Sulphur dioxide g/g CNWAD 5.9 4.0 4.3 4.0 3.1
Copper (Cu2+) ppm 20 20 / / /

Note: 1.59 litres of working volume, 250 mL/min oxygen flowrate, pH 9.0.
Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com174

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 13.28 Cyanide destruction operating conditions and results for Met Samples 2, 5, and 11

 

Test Met Sample 2 Met Sample 5 Met Sample 11
Sample description 100% oxide 100% transitional 100% sulphide
Stream Before
detox
After
detox
Before
detox
After
detox
Before
detox
After
detox
WAD cyanide CNWAD ppm 931 1.95 1,015 1.15 1,142 <1.0
Total cyanide CNT ppm   6.9   8.0   4.6
Thiocyanate SCN ppm 53 46 96 80 411 276
Silver Ag ppm 1.4 <0.1 1.4 <0.1 2.4 <0.1
Copper Cu ppm 50 0.2 100 0.1 289 0.8
Iron Fe ppm 15 3.9 38 2.1 48 1.6
Zinc Zn ppm 5 <0.1 8 <0.1 90 0.4

 

Chemical addition

Lime g/g Na2S2O5 0.36 0.31 0.40
Sulphur
Dioxide
g/g CNWAD 3.73 4.00 4.00

Note: 1.59 litre working volume, 250 mL/min oxygen flowrate, pH 9.0, no copper sulfate addition,
Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

Five cyanide destruction tests were completed for Met Sample 1. The operating conditions and results are presented in Table 13.27. With the 20 ppm copper addition, the WAD cyanide concentration was reduced to 1.3 ppm when the SO2/CNWAD ratio was 5.9:1 and to less than 1.0 ppm when the SO2/CNWAD ratio was 4.0:1. Without the addition of copper sulfate, cyanide destruction remained successful with the residual WAD cyanide being less than 1.0 ppm at the SO2/CNWAD ratio of 4.3:1, 1.0 ppm WAD cyanide at the SO2/CNWAD ratio of 4.0:1, and 1.3 ppm WAD cyanide at the SO2/CNWAD ratio of 3.1:1.

 

For Met Samples 2, Met Sample 5, and Met Sample 11, the cyanide destruction operating conditions and results are presented in Table 13.28. After cyanide destruction was completed under the conditions of SO2/CNWAD ratio of 3.7:1~4.0:1 and 1.5-hour retention time, the residual WAD cyanide concentration was reduced to 1.95 ppm for Met Sample 2, 1.15 ppm for Met Sample 5, and less than 1.0 ppm for Met Sample 11.

 

13.3.12Solid-liquid separation and slurry rheology

 

Solid-liquid separation and slurry rheology were conducted by Pocock Industrial in Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Four detoxed cyanide tailing samples were used, namely, Met Sample 1 (10% oxide + 80% transitional + 10% sulphide), Met Sample 2 (100% oxide), Met Sample 5 (100% transitional), and Met Sample 11 (100% sulphide). Each tailing sample received a comprehensive testing suite that included sample characterization, flocculant screening, static thickening, dynamic thickening, thickener underflow viscosity, and thickener underflow pressure filtration.

 

Testing began with flocculant screening procedures intended to select a product which is able to provide the best overall performance with respect to overflow clarity, solid settling rate, and underflow viscosity characteristics. After a correct flocculant was selected, both static and dynamic thickening tests were performed. These tests developed a general set of data for thickener design and evaluation that included optimum flocculant dose requirements as well as the underflow and overflow characteristics that impact downstream operations. Rheology tests were then performed on the underflow samples which were generated during thickening tests. These procedures helped predict underflow density and provide the required profiles for pump, pipeline, and agitated tank design. Finally, pressure filtration tests performed on thickener

 

amcconsultants.com175

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

underflow developed a general set of data to aid in the design and operation of various types of pressure filters.

 

Table 13.29 Thickener design criteria and operating parameters

 

Sample ID

Description

Solid
SG
Feed pulp
density
Flocculant
dosage
Volumetric
loading
Solid
loading
Solid in
overflow
Solid in
underflow
t/m3 % solid g/t (m3/h)/m2 (t/h)/m2 ppm %

Met Sample 1

10% oxide +

80% oxide +

10% sulphide

2.76

25.5

45~50

2.52

0.77

<250

67

Met Sample 2 100% oxide 2.77 25.2 50~55 2.55 0.77 <250 66
Met Sample 5

100%

transitional

2.68 25.3 60~65 2.52 0.76 <250 67
Met Sample 11

100%

sulphide

2.78 25.0 45~50 2.45 0.73 <250 65

Note: Temperature 20°C, pH 9.1~9.2, flocculant SNF 905SH.
Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

Based on the dynamic thickening testing data, the thickener design criteria and operating parameters were developed and are shown in Table 13.29. These design conditions represent a moderately aggressive design philosophy and correspond to the feed pulp density, overflow solid concentration, and flocculant dosage.

 

The design hydraulic loading rate ranged from 2.45 to 2.55 (m3/h)/m2 and the corresponding solid loading rate was between 0.73 and 0.77 (t/h)/m2. The thickener underflow pulp density was expected to be 65~67% solid.

 

Rheology tests were carried out to determine apparent viscosity as a function of shear rates at given pulp density and temperature. Based on the observed relationship between shear stress and shear rate, the yield stress value was determined for the slurry in each case. Table 13.30 shows the measured apparent viscosity and yield stress values. The data show that these four thickened underflow samples displayed similar rheological behaviours. Met Sample 11 tended to display slightly higher viscosity and yield stress compared to other three samples at equivalent solid concentration. For all samples, the decreasing apparent viscosity with increasing shear rate or “shear thinning” behaviour, is characteristic of the pseudoplastic class of non-Newtonian fluids. It demonstrates the need to achieve and maintain a specific velocity gradient or shear rate in order to initiate and maintain the flow.

 

amcconsultants.com176

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 13.30 Apparent viscosity and yield stress

 

Sample ID Description Pulp density Coefficient of rigidity  Yield stress Apparent viscosity @ the following shear rates
25 50 75 100 200 400 600 800 1,000
Secˉ¹ Secˉ¹ Secˉ¹ Secˉ¹ Secˉ¹ Secˉ¹ Secˉ¹ Secˉ¹ Secˉ¹
% solid Pa Pa Pa·Sec
Met Sample 1 10% oxide + 80% oxide + 10% sulphide 68.1 0.116 41 5.47 1.92 1.22 0.78 0.50 0.32 0.24 0.20 0.17
66.6 0.084 27 3.83 1.33 0.84 0.53 0.34 0.21 0.16 0.14 0.12
65.0 0.051 18 2.67 0.87 0.54 0.33 0.21 0.13 0.10 0.08 0.07
62.6 0.032 11 1.65 0.55 0.34 0.21 0.13 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.04
59.4 0.024 5 0.98 0.31 0.19 0.12 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02
Met Sample 2 100% oxide 69.9 0.132 88 7.96 3.07 2.03 1.35 0.89 0.59 0.47 0.39 0.34
68.2 0.088 57 5.59 2.04 1.32 0.86 0.56 0.36 0.28 0.23 0.20
66.7 0.062 31 3.57 1.26 0.80 0.51 0.33 0.21 0.16 0.13 0.12
64.6 0.038 18 2.45 0.78 0.47 0.29 0.18 0.11 0.08 0.07 0.06
62.0 0.020 10 1.40 0.43 0.26 0.15 0.09 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03
Met Sample 5 100% transitional 69.6 0.134 73 7.53 2.77 1.80 1.17 0.76 0.50 0.39 0.32 0.28
68.1 0.094 44 5.17 1.84 1.18 0.76 0.49 0.31 0.24 0.20 0.17
66.2 0.057 24 3.35 1.10 0.68 0.42 0.26 0.16 0.12 0.10 0.09
63.4 0.034 13 2.01 0.61 0.37 0.22 0.13 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.04
59.9 0.022 5 1.01 0.31 0.19 0.11 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02
Met Sample 11 100% sulphide 67.9 0.115 61 6.23 2.36 1.55 1.02 0.67 0.44 0.35 0.29 0.25
66.9 0.092 45 4.61 1.81 1.21 0.81 0.54 0.36 0.29 0.24 0.21
65.4 0.056 33 3.48 1.25 0.81 0.52 0.34 0.22 0.17 0.14 0.12
62.7 0.036 22 2.69 0.88 0.54 0.33 0.21 0.13 0.10 0.08 0.07
60.6 0.028 17 2.19 0.66 0.40 0.24 0.14 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.04

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com177

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Underflow slurry exhibiting a yield stress value greater than 30 Pascal (measured on fully sheared slurry) is normally beyond the capability of standard thickening and pumping systems. Specialized equipment and design engineering are generally required when operating at underflow pulp density which exhibits yield stress value greater than 30 Pascal. In addition to the 30 Pascal limitation, the shape of the curve for the yield stress versus pulp density should also be considered when selecting a proper range for thickener and/or pump / transport pipeline design.

 

Design underflow pulp density should be selected based on the shape of the curve to avoid the exponential region, as the slurry could quickly become solidified beyond pumping capability with only a slight increase of pulp density.

 

Pressure filtration tests were carried out to generate a general set of filtration data to design and size the pressure filters. The tests examined the effect of cake thickness and dry time on the production rate and filter cake moisture. For each sample, two operational scenarios were tested, namely standard pressure form and air blow without squeeze, and standard pressure form with membrane squeeze during air blow followed by a high-pressure membrane squeeze. The standard pressure procedure (form and air blow) was performed at 5.5 bar (80 psi) and the high-pressure form procedure was completed at 16 bar (232 psi). For the scenario that utilized the membrane squeeze during air blow, 6.9 bar (100 psi) was applied until the last 30 seconds of air blow when the squeeze pressure was increased to 16 bar (232 psi) to complete the cycle. Pressure filtration tests examined the effect of form pressure, squeeze pressure, cake thickness, and air-dry duration on the production rate and filter cake moisture.

 

amcconsultants.com178

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 13.31 Recommended pressure filter operating parameters

 

Sample ID Description Feed density Design condition Dry bulk
density
Chamber & final
thickness
Sizing basis Cake formation
time
Filter cake
moisture
Total cycle
time
Production
% solid kg/m3 mm m3/t min % min (kg/h)/m2
Met Sample 1 10% oxide +
80% oxide +
10% sulphide
55 5.5 bar form and air blow,
no squeeze
1,554 60 / 60 0.80 2.79 13.9 12.0 146
16 bar final membrane
squeeze
1,653 60 / 56.4 0.76 2.69 12.6 12.5 140
Met Sample 2 100% oxide 60 5.5 bar form and air blow,
no squeeze
1,548 60 / 60 0.81 1.28 13.6 12.0 145
16 bar final membrane
squeeze
1,612 60 / 57.6 0.78 1.24 12.7 12.5 139
Met Sample 5 100% transitional 55 16 bar final membrane
squeeze
1,574 60 / 60 0.79 1.07 13.5 12.0 148
5.5 bar form and air blow,
no squeeze
1,685 60 / 56.0 0.74 1.06 12.9 12.5 142
Met Sample 11 100% sulphide 55 16 bar final membrane
squeeze
1,526 60 / 60 0.82 1.79 14.4 12.0 143
5.5 bar form and air blow,
no squeeze
1,620 60 / 56.5 0.77 1.72 13.2 12.5 137

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com179

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 13.31 shows the recommended pressure filter operating parameters, which were derived from the testwork data. For sizing of the recessed plate pressure filter, minimum cake formation time is 3.0 minutes, air dry time is 3.0 minutes, and 20 hours of operating time per day. For sizing of the membrane-type recessed pressure filter, minimum cake formation time is 3.5 minutes, air dry time is 3.0 minutes, and 20 hours of operating time per day. The air blow-only option yielded design cake moistures of approximately 13.5~13.9% within reasonable dry times for Met Samples 1, 2, and 5. Met Sample 11 yielded a slightly higher moisture of 14.4%, although it was still considered dry and acceptable. The membrane squeeze option was able to reduce design cake moisture by approximately 0.9~1.3% at comparable dry times.

 

Squeezing also produced cakes with very good discharge and stacking properties. For all samples, the area-based production rates at comparable dry times ranged between 143~148 (kg/h)/m2 for the air blow-only option and 137 – 141 (kg/h)/m2 for the light membrane squeeze during air blow followed by a full pressure membrane squeeze option. If cake washing is applied, the cycle time will be a little longer and the production rate will decrease.

 

13.3.13Transportable moisture limit

 

Transportable moisture limit (TML) is the maximum moisture content of a cargo that is considered safe for transportation in ship. If the cargo is assessed as having higher actual moisture content than its TML, IMSBC Code (International Maritime Solid Bulk Cargo) does not allow the cargo to be loaded and transported by sea unless the vessel is specially built or fitted for confining the cargo shift.

 

The TML was measured for four detoxed cyanide leach tailing samples by SGS in Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada. Its values are presented in Table 13.32. These TML values serve as a guideline to the cake moisture of pressure filtration for the future commercial operation.

 

Table 13.32 Flow moisture point (FMP) and TML

 

Sample ID Sample description FMP TML
% %
Met Sample 1 10% oxide + 80% transitional + 10% sulphide 14.0 12.6
Met Sample 2 100% oxide 15.4 13.9
Met Sample 5 100% transitional 14.9 13.4
Met Sample 11 100% sulphide 15.5 14.0
Average 15.0 13.5

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

Environmental testing of the detoxed cyanide leach tailings

 

The modified acid-base accounting (ABA) tests provided quantification of total sulphur, sulphide sulphur, sulfate contents, and maximum potential acid generation (MPA) related to the oxidation of sulphide sulphur. The procedure determined the neutralization potential (NP) of the sample by initiating a reaction with the addition of excess hydrochloric acid and then identified the quantity of acid neutralized by the sample’s NP by back-titrating to pH 8.3 with sodium hydroxide. The balance between the MPA and NP defined the potential to generate acid drainage upon exposure to oxygen (air) and water.

 

The net acid generation (NAG) testing was conducted to determine the balance between the acid consuming and acid producing components. The NAG test initiated a reaction between the sample and concentrated hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in order to force complete oxidation and reaction of the acidity produced with the neutralizing minerals present within the sample. After the reaction ceased,

 

amcconsultants.com180

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

the pH of the solution was measured (NAG pH). The acid remaining after the reaction was titrated with sodium hydroxide to pH 4.5 and the net acid generated by the reaction was calculated and expressed in unit of kg H2SO4 equivalent per tonne of solid. The NAG4.5 value indicates the contribution from free acid, aluminum, and iron. Titration from pH 4.5 to pH 7.0 can provide additional information, because the NAG7.0 is indicative of the presence of metallic ions that consume alkalinity over this pH range, such as copper and zinc.

 

Table 13.33 shows the ABA results and NAG results for four detoxed cyanide leach tailing samples. Met Sample 2 (100% oxide) is expected to be nearly neutral. Met Sample 1, 5, and 11 are expected to produce acid upon complete oxidation of sulphide minerals. Nevertheless, oxidation of sulphide minerals was slow (Figure 13.10). Over a period of 27 weeks, the pH decreased only slightly.

 

Table 13.33 Results of ABA and NAG tests for the detoxed cyanide leach tailing solids

 

  Met Sample 1 Met Sample 2 Met Sample 5 Met Sample 11
10% oxide +
80% transitional
+ 10% sulphide
100%
oxide
100%
transitional
100%
sulphide
ABA
testing
STOTAL % 1.08 0.27 0.93 2.05
SSO4 % 0.11 0.05 0.07 0.11
S2- % 0.93 0.20 0.75 1.80
CTOTAL % <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
CO2 % <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
MPA kg CaCO3/t 33.8 8.4 29.1 64.1
NP kg CaCO3/t 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0
NNP kg CaCO3/t -30.8 -5.4 -26.1 -60.1
NP/MPA Ratio   0.09 0.36 0.1 0.06
NAG
testing
pH   2.6 4.9 2.8 2.4
NAG pH 4.5 kg H2SO4/t 18.3 <0.01 13.0 26.8
NAG pH 7.0 kg H2SO4/t 22.0 0.58 18.2 34.3

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com181

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 13.10 pH reading during humidity cell testing for Met Sample 1

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

13.4Metallurgical predictions

 

Silver is the only pay metal envisaged by the PFS. Copper is noted in test results, but the concentrations of copper in solution are generally insufficient to warrant a specific copper recovery circuit for by-product credits.

 

A significant number of composite samples have been tested over the last 3 years, representing a wide variety of composition and grade. Results vary significantly depending on test conditions. Silver recovery appears to be dependent on a variety of factors including the geometallurgical type (oxide, transitional or sulphide), the cyanide and dissolved oxygen concentrations in the leach, slurry mixing intensity, the residence time and to a lesser extent the head grade. Generally speaking, one sees superior performance from oxide and transitional material compared to sulphide material. Grinds finer than ~80 µm are considered necessary for good recovery.

 

Aggressive leaching conditions, whilst good for silver, also tend to leach more copper into solution, and this can be a significant consumer of cyanide. If cyanide availability decreases due to excessive consumption, then this tends to have a detrimental impact on silver recovery.

 

The PFS flowsheet has been developed after a thorough analysis of the metallurgical test results (as reported in Section 13). The PFS mine plan has also been considered, and the mixture of geometallurgical ore types during early production periods has been assessed. Figure 13.11 shows the blend of types by year for the life of mine.

 

amcconsultants.com182

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 13.11 LOM annual ore blends

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

The blend of geometallurgical ore types for the first seven years of production is 11% oxide, 66% transitional, 21% sulphide, and 3% unknown (no ID). The weighted average grade over this period is 117 g/t Ag. These metrics correlate well with those of the “Met Sample 1 NEW” composite as tested at ALS in 2023. The results of work on this particular composite are summarized in Table 13.34 below. These tests were conducted over a 72-hour leach period without activated carbon, lifterbottle leach, a pulp density of 45% solids and a grind size of 80% passing ~75 µm.

 

Table 13.34 Met Sample 1 NEW results summary

 

 

Test ID

Sparged gas Cyanide
concentration
Lead
nitrate
Back calcd.
head grade
Silver
recovery
Cyanide
consumption
Lime
consumption
Type Flowrate
mL/min g/L NaCN kg/t g/t % kg/t NaCN kg/t CaO
72CN Oxygen 19

 

 

2.00

 

 

/

111 89.2 1.16 1.3
73CN Oxygen 9 113 89.4 0.99 1.0
74CN Air 19 121 89.6 0.94 1.6
75CN Oxygen 38 114 90.6 0.96 1.3
78CN Oxygen 19 3.00 / 111 91.0 1.37 2.2
79CN Oxygen 19 2.00 0.20 116 88.0 1.18 1.3
Average 114 89.6 1.10 1.4

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

The results indicate an average silver recovery of 89.6% with a 1% relative standard deviation. Average cyanide consumption is 1.1 kg/t.

 

After Year 7, the percentage of sulphide material increases so that the LOM average composition is 9% oxide, 59% transitional, 29% sulphide, and 3% unknown (no ID). The weighted average grade over the LOM is 105 g/t Ag.

 

amcconsultants.com183

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Similar testing was conducted on another production composite, “Met Sample 1” (as shown in Table 13.35 which had a different composition, namely 10% oxide, 80% transitional, 10% sulphide. The additional transitional material in this composite resulted in superior results with an average silver recovery of 92.7%. These results are presented in Table 13.35.

 

Table 13.35 Met Sample 1 results summary

 

 

Test ID

 

Pulp
density

 

Cyanide
concentration

 

Lead
nitrate

 

Retention
time

 

Back calcd.
head grade

 

Silver
recovery

 

Cyanide
consumption

 

Lime
consumption

% solid g/L NaCN kg/t h g/t % kg/t NaCN kg/t CaO
28CN 40 3.00 0.30 72 133 92.3 1.62 1.8
38CN 40 3.00 0.30 48 138 92.0 1.23 1.5
48CN 40 3.00 0.30 48 153 92.7 1.67 1.7
66CN 45 2.00 / 72 157 93.8 1.08 1.4
Average   145 92.7 1.40 1.6

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

This suggests that production periods with higher proportions of transitional material will see slightly higher silver recoveries, whilst those periods with higher proportions of sulphide material (e.g., Year 14) will see slightly lower silver recoveries.

 

amcconsultants.com184

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

14Mineral Resource estimates

 

14.1Introduction

 

The Mineral Resource for the Silver Sand deposit has been estimated by Ms Dinara Nussipakynova, P.Geo., of BBA, formerly employed with AMC Consultants, who takes responsibility for the estimate.

 

The estimate is dated 31 October 2022 and is an update to the initial Mineral Resource estimate on the deposit, which was discussed in the 2020 Technical Report. The data used in this estimate includes results of all drilling carried out on the Property up to 25 July 2022.

 

The estimation was carried out in Datamine™ software. Interpolation of Ag, As and S grades were carried out using ordinary kriging (OK) for the four main mineralized domains, and the background model. The remaining 127 small domains were estimated using the inverse distance squared (ID2) method. The grades for Pb, Zn, and Cu were estimated separately using the indicator method to define the higher grade zones and utilized OK for the estimation, ignoring the domains used for the estimation of the other metals. The indicator method was also used to define the location of the oxidation type.

 

The result of the current estimate is summarized in Table 14.1. The following metals were estimated: silver, lead, zinc, copper, arsenic, and sulphur. Only silver is reported as it is the only economic metal. The additional elements were estimated to enable geometallurgical modelling to be carried out. The model is depleted for historical mining activities. The Mineral Resources are reported within a conceptional pit shell and at a 30 g/t Ag COG.

 

Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

 

Table 14.1 Silver Sand Mineral Resource as of 31 October 2022

 

Resource category Tonnes (Mt) Ag (g/t) Ag (Moz)
Measured 14.88 131 62.60
Indicated 39.38 110 139.17
Measured & Indicated 54.26 116 201.77
Inferred 4.56 88 12.95

Notes:

·CIM Definition Standards (2014) were used for reporting the Mineral Resources.
·The Qualified Person is Dinara Nussipakynova, P.Geo. of BBA, formerly employed with AMC Consultants.
·Mineral Resources are constrained by optimized pit shells at a metal price of US$22.50/oz Ag, recovery of 91% Ag and COG of 30 g/t Ag.
·Drilling results up to 25 July 2022.
·The numbers may not compute exactly due to rounding.
·Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

The Company is progressing with community engagement and securing surface rights for its project in Bolivia, but faces disruptions from illegal artisanal and small-scale miners (“ASMs”) whose activities conflict with project development. Legal proceedings and government support are underway to resolve the issue, with the Company optimistic about a favorable outcome that aligns with community and governmental interests. Regarding the extent of the impact of the illegal ASM activities on the Project’s Mineral Resources, the Company believes the mineralized material extracted is not significant.

 

The Qualified Person has relied, in respect to certain information concerning environmental, permitting and social aspects relevant to the Technical Report, upon the guidance of the Company and experts outlined in Section 3. The Qualified Person is not aware of any mining, metallurgical,

 

amcconsultants.com185

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

infrastructure, permitting, environmental, political or other factors that may materially affect the current Mineral Resources.In the last five years, Bolivia experienced a transition from social turmoil to stability. The government of the current President, elected at the end of 2020 supports and encourages private and foreign investments in the economic sectors of the country. New laws were approved by congress to encourage private investments in mining sector, for example, Law 1391 (Decree 4579) waives value added tax for import of equipment and vehicles.

 

Although the country is now generally friendly to private and foreign investments in the mining sector, risks associated with instability of government caused by political polarization and visible divisions in the governing party remains. In addition, local protests and blockages by various social groups may pose unforeseen instability from time to time. Overall, political and social risks are currently manageable in Bolivia. The country has become relatively more attractive for foreign investments, and this trend is evidenced by the fact that more western exploration and mining companies started business in the country in recent years.

 

14.2Data used

 

14.2.1Drillhole database

 

The data used in the estimate consists of surface diamond drillholes only. New Pacific maintains the resource database in a Microsoft Access database and provided data to AMC Consultants as Microsoft Excel files. The number of holes and number of assays used in the AMC Consultants estimate, by year of drilling, is shown in Table 14.2.

 

Table 14.2 Drillhole data used in the estimate

 

Year drilled No. of drillholes No. of assays Metres drilled (m)
2017 18 3,337 5,020
2018 177 34,728 49,991
2019 206 30,662 45,874
2020 13 1,762 2,489
2021 54 7,835 12,815
2022 88 13,840 20,031
Total 556 92,164 136,220

Notes:

·Drillholes are surface DDHs.
·Drill data to 25 July 2022.
·Numbers may not add due to rounding.
·Number of drillholes on the Property is 566 but only 556 are in the Mineral Resource area.

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.com186

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 14.1 is a plan showing the location of the drillholes used in the estimate.

 

Figure 14.1 Silver Sand drillhole location plan

 

 

amcconsultants.com187

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

14.2.2Bulk density

 

New Pacific performed 6,297 density measurements on the core drilled on the Property. The collection of bulk density measurements is described in Section 11. As the mineralization is hosted in one rock type, after reviewing the density data, the QP assigned one density measurement to the block model of 2.54 t/m3.

 

14.2.3Lithological domains

 

The Silver Sand deposit is hosted in La Puerta Formation sandstones and is capped by the red siltstone of the Tarapaya Formation as discussed in Section 7. New Pacific provided the contact between these two formations. The contact was modelled in Leapfrog Geo 4.0 (Leapfrog). The contact was reviewed and accepted by the QP.

 

14.2.4Mineralization domains

 

Mineralization domains were constructed by New Pacific. The mineralization wireframes were built by the grade shell method in Leapfrog.

 

The mineralization domains were reviewed and accepted by the QP with minor changes including a change of the naming convention. Domains 1-4 are the main domains which contain 80% of the volume of mineralization are shown in Figure 14.2 as a red solid. In Figure 14.3 the relative percentage volumes of the domains or group of domains are shown.

 

Visual checks were carried out by the QP to ensure that the constraining wireframes respected the raw data.

 

Figure 14.2 3D view of mineralization domains looking north-east

 

 

amcconsultants.com188

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 14.3 Pie-chart of the percentage volume by domains

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

14.2.5Mined-out domains

 

New Pacific provided AMC Consultants with void solids that are interpreted to represent historical mining. The void solids were built by extrapolating voids in Leapfrog tools. Surveying of the historical mining voids could not be undertaken due to safety issues.

 

The QP compared the provided solids with the drillhole database and found them to be acceptable.

 

14.3Modeling approach

 

Grade estimation was completed using two different approaches.

 

1Ag, As, and S estimation carried out within mineralization domains as described in Section 14.2.4, (the background model was unconstrained).
2Cu, Pb, and Zn estimation was constrained into high and low grade volumes using an Indicator method.

 

An oxidation model consisting of oxide, transition and sulphide was also constrained using an Indicator method.

 

14.4Statistics and compositing

 

Sample lengths range from 0.01 m to 9.2 m within the resource area. The mean sample length is 1.19 m. Given this mean and considering the width of the mineralization, the QP chose to composite to 1.2 m lengths within the domains. Outside the domains for the background model a composite length of 2.5 m was used. Samples were composited by domain using Datamine’s dynamic

 

amcconsultants.com189

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

composting tool. This tool adjusts each composite length as necessary to achieve equal sample support and eliminate residuals (very short samples).

 

The composite data for Ag, As, and S for all mineralization domains were viewed on log probability plots, and also evaluated using the decile method, to assist with determining the capping level for higher values. The probability plot for Ag is shown in Figure 14.4.

 

Figure 14.4 Probability plot for Ag

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

Capping was applied for Ag and As after compositing with the results as shown in Table 14.3. No capping was applied for S.

 

Table 14.3Grade capping for silver and arsenic

 

Element Top cap Original mean New mean Number of
samples top cut

New mean grade as

% of original

Ag (g/t) 2,000 125 120 65 96.3%
As (ppm) 2,000 236 234 76 97.9%

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.com190

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The raw, composited, and capped assay data for silver for all the mineralized domains are shown in Table 14.4.

 

Table 14.4 Ag statistics of raw, composited, and capped assay data

 

Domain Data Number of
samples
Minimum Maximum Mean Standard
deviation
Coefficient of
variation

 

1

Raw selected 5,469 0.0 16,194 113 349.59 3.08
Composited 5,366 0.0 10,532 113 293.03 2.59
Capped 5,366 0.0 2,000 108 217.45 2.00

 

2

Raw selected 8,888 0.0 12,791 138 371.97 2.69
Composited 8,726 0.0 10,740 138 322.44 2.33
Capped 8,726 0.0 2,000 133 255.55 1.92

 

3

Raw selected 214 0.2 3,410 116 330.36 2.83
Composited 210 0.2 3,137 116 302.59 2.59
Capped 210 0.2 2,000 111 254.01 2.29

 

4

Raw selected 213 0.5 1,130 74 120.28 1.64
Composited 204 0.5 1,120 74 110.61 1.50
Capped 204 0.5 1,120 74 110.61 1.50

 

5 -131

Raw selected 2,294 0.0 7,830 108 299.12 2.78
Composited 2,238 0.0 4,009 108 257.77 2.39
Capped 2,238 0.0 2,000 104 219.31 2.11

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

14.5Block model parameters

 

The block size selected for estimating Ag, As and S within the mineralization domains was 2.5 mE x 5 mN x 2.5 mRL with sub-blocking employed. Sub-blocking resulted in minimum cell dimensions of 1.25 mE x 0.5 mN x 1.25 mRL. The background mineralization, being that outside the mineralization domains, was estimated with a parent block dimension of 10 mE x 10 mN x 10 mRL.

 

Cu, Pb and Zn and the oxidation attributes were estimated into 2.5 mE x 5 mN x 2.5 mRL blocks for the high grade and 5 mE x 10 mN x 5 mRL for the low grade. These elements and As an S were estimated for geometallurgical purposes only.

 

All models were then merged to form one model. The block model dimensions and rotation for the merged model are shown in Table 14.5. The model was rotated counter-clockwise around the Z-axis.

 

Table 14.5 Block model parameters

 

Parameter X Y Z
Origin (m) 234,500 7,854,750 3,400
Maximum block size (m)* 5 10 5
Minimum block size (m) 0.625 0.250 0.250
Rotation angle (deg) 0 0 -30
No. of blocks 500 280 200

Note: *Parent block size of merged model.

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.com191

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

14.6Variography and grade estimation

 

Variography was carried out on domains 1-4 and for the low-grade background model, for Ag, As, and S. The search distances for the grade estimation were based on the variogram ranges. Search parameters for domains 5-131 were based on vein orientation and visual continuity. Dynamic anisotropy was used in the estimation process for domains 60-68, where the internal orientation was variable.

 

Three passes were employed, each using different search distances and passes. Table 14.6 shows the search parameters for Ag.

 

Table 14.6 Ag grade interpolation search parameters

 

 

Domain

 

Pass

 

X (m)

 

Y (m)

 

Z (m)

Rotation angle axis Z Rotation angle axis X Rotation angle axis Y Minimum no. of samples Maximum no.
of samples
Minimum no. of drillholes

 

1

1 80 80 12 240 70 0 6 12 2
2 160 160 24 240 70 0 4 12 2
3 240 240 36 240 70 0 2 12 2

 

2

1 86 102 12 240 70 0 6 12 2
2 172 204 24 240 70 0 4 12 2
3 258 306 36 240 70 0 2 12 2

 

3

1 76 91 10 240 70 0 6 12 2
2 152 182 20 240 70 0 4 12 2
3 228 273 30 240 70 0 2 12 2

 

4

1 72 72 17 240 70 0 6 12 2
2 144 144 34 240 70 0 4 12 2
3 216 216 51 240 70 0 2 12 2

 

5 – 59

1 80 90 15 240 77 0 6 12 2
2 160 180 30 240 70 0 4 12 2
3 240 270 45 240 70 0 2 12 2

 

60 – 68

1 80 90 15 DA DA 0 6 12 2
2 160 180 30 DA DA 0 4 12 2
3 240 270 45 DA DA 0 2 12 2

 

69 – 131

1 40 45 8 240 77 0 2 12 -
2 80 90 16 240 70 0 2 12 -
3 120 135 24 240 70 0 2 12 -

 

Background

1 100 90 21 240 75 0 6 12 2
2 200 180 42 240 75 0 4 12 2
3 300 270 63 240 75 0 2 12 2

Note: DA - Dynamic anisotropy angles.

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

The estimation was carried out in Datamine™ software and the interpolation methods used were as follows:

 

·Domains 1-4, Ag, As, and S grades interpolated by OK
·Background model, Ag, As, and S grades interpolated by OK
·Domains 5-132, Ag, As, and S grades interpolated ID2
·Total model, Pb, Zn, and Cu interpolated by OK
·Oxidation attributes interpolated by OK

 

amcconsultants.com192

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The blocks inside the block model are coded by estimated Ag, As, S, Cu, Pb, and Zn. In addition, the oxidation type and an assigned bulk density value are included. Only silver, which has a proven metallurgical recovery method, is reported in the Mineral Resource statement.

 

14.7Resource classification

 

Mineral Resource classification was completed using an assessment of geological and mineralization continuity, data quality, and data density. Search passes, which were different from those used to estimate grade, were used as an initial guide for classification. Wireframes were then generated manually to build coherent areas defining the different classes.

 

Interpolation for classification was carried out using the OK method. Three passes were employed, each using different search distances and multiples as follows:

 

·Pass 1 = 1 x search distance
·Pass 2 = 2 x search distance
·Pass 3 = 3 x search distance

 

These are shown in Table 14.7 along with the minimum and maximum number of samples used for each pass.

 

Table 14.7 Class interpolation search parameters

 

Pass X (m) Y (m) Z (m) Minimum no.
of samples
Maximum no.
of samples
Minimum no.
of drillholes
1 30 30 10 8 24 4
2 60 60 20 6 20 3
3 90 90 30 4 20 2

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

Figure 14.5 shows a 3D view of the resource classification constrained by the domains in the block model.

 

amcconsultants.com193

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 14.5 3D view of the resource classification

 

 

14.8Block model validation

 

The block model was validated in four ways. First, visual checks were carried out to ensure that the grades respected the raw assay data. Secondly, swath plots were reviewed. Thirdly, the estimate was statistically compared to the capped assay data, with satisfactory results. Lastly the OK estimates were compared to an ID2, and inverse distance cubed (ID3) and a nearest neighbour (NN) estimate, all with acceptable results.

 

14.8.1Visual checks

 

Figure 14.6 shows a plan view of the block model showing drillhole composite silver grades on drillhole traces compared to the block model estimated grades.

 

The comparison was viewed on a number of sections and as an example Section 5200 is located on Figure 14.6 and this section is shown in Figure 14.7 as a representative section.

 

amcconsultants.com194

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 14.6 Plan view of the block model and drillholes

 

 

amcconsultants.com195

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 14.7 Block model versus drillhole grade on Section 5200

 

 

14.8.2Swath plots

 

Swath plots for all domains for the combined Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Ag mineralization are shown below in Figure 14.8. Except for some areas where there is sparse data there is acceptable agreement between drillhole and block model silver grades.

 

amcconsultants.com196

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 14.8 All domains swath plot for silver

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

The swath plots show a reasonable correlation between block model grades and composite grades.

 

14.8.3Statistical comparison

 

Table 14.8 shows the statistical comparison on the composites versus the block model grades for silver.

 

amcconsultants.com197

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 14.8 Statistical comparison of capped assay data and block model for Ag

 

Domain 1 2 3 4 5 – 131
Data Comps Model Comps Model Comps Model Comps Model Comps Model
N records 5,366 1,234,369 8,726 788,030 210 50,533 204 35,802 2,238 721,335
Minimum 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 1.33 0.50 2.80 0.00 0.00
Maximum 2,000 1,606 2,000 1,477 2,000 1,244 1,120 645 2,000 1,939
Mean 109 93 133 120 111 101 74 80 104 105
SD 217.45 72.05 255.55 92.67 254.01 105.37 110.61 60.04 219.31 118.03
CV 2.00 0.78 1.92 0.77 2.29 1.04 1.50 0.75 2.11 1.13

Notes: SD – Standard Deviation, CV – Coefficient of Variation.

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

14.8.4Comparison with other interpolation methods

 

The OK estimates were compared to an ID2, and ID3 and a NN estimate, also with acceptable results. Note, domains 5-131 were estimated by ID2 and the comparison was to ID3 and NN models.

 

14.9Mineral Resource estimate

 

The Mineral Resources are reported for blocks within a pit shell based on a $22.50/ounce Ag price. This shell includes Mineral Resources reported both within the AMC claim boundary and the MPC.

 

The cut-off applied for reporting the Mineral Resources is 30 g/t Ag. Assumptions made to derive the COG and build the pit shell included mining costs, processing costs and metallurgical recoveries. These inputs were obtained from benchmarked comparable studies and metallurgical testwork. These parameters are shown in Table 14.9. The model is depleted for historical mining activities. Measured, Indicated, and Inferred blocks were used to define the pit shell.

 

Table 14.9 Cut-off grade and conceptual pit parameters

 

Input Units Value
Silver price $/oz Ag 22.5
Silver process recovery % 91
Payable silver % 99
Mining recovery factor % 100
Mining cost $/t mined 2.6
Process cost $/t minable material > COG 16
G&A cost $/t minable material > COG 2
Slope angle Degrees 44 – 47

Notes:

·Sustaining capital cost has not been included.
·Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Mineral Resources included.
·G&A cost refers to General and Administration costs.

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.com198

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The Mineral Resource estimate is shown in Table 14.10.

 

Table 14.10

Silver Sand Mineral Resource as of 31 October 2022

 

Resource category Tonnes (Mt) Ag (g/t) Ag (Moz)
Measured 14.88 131 62.60
Indicated 39.38 110 139.17
Measured & Indicated 54.26 116 201.77
Inferred 4.56 88 12.95

Notes:

·CIM Definition Standards (2014) were used for reporting the Mineral Resources.
·The Qualified Person is Dinara Nussipakynova, P.Geo. of BBA, formerly employed withAMC Consultants.
·Mineral Resources are constrained by optimized pit shells at a metal price of US$22.50/oz Ag, recovery of 91% Ag and COG of 30 g/t Ag.
·Drilling results up to 25 July 2022.
·The numbers may not compute exactly due to rounding.
·Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

The majority of the Mineral Resources lie within the AMC. Table 14.11 shows the split of the 2022 Mineral Resource within the AMC boundary and outside the boundary. Since the 2019 Mineral Resources were reported, a subsequent agreement with COMIBOL permits the reporting of Mineral Resources outside the AMC. Mineral Resources in the MPC will be subject to a royalty of 6% payable to COMIBOL during the production stage according to the agreement reached with COMIBOL.

 

Table 14.11 Mineral Resources within and outside the AMC

 

Resource category Inside AMC boundary Outside AMC boundary
Tonnes (Mt) Ag (g/t) Ag (Moz) Tonnes (Mt) Ag (g/t) Ag (Moz)
Measured 14.57 131 61.51 0.31 108 1.08
Indicated 34.38 110 121.38 5.00 111 17.79
Measured & Indicated 48.95 116 182.90 5.31 111 18.87
Inferred 3.17 77 7.88 1.40 113 5.07

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

The results of reporting the Measured and Indicated portion of the block model at a range of cut-offs are shown in Table 14.12, with the preferred cut-off shown in bold text. The QP notes the block model is relatively insensitive to COG.

 

Table 14.12 Model sensitivity to cut-offs

 

Cut-off grade Ag (g/t) Tonnes (Mt) Ag (g/t) Ag (Moz)
25 55.46 114 202.83
30 54.26 116 201.77
35 52.41 119 199.83
40 50.02 122 196.94
45 47.36 127 193.30

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

amcconsultants.com199

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

14.10Comparison with previous Mineral Resource estimate

 

A comparison of the 2019 and 2022 Mineral Resource estimates are shown in Table 14.13. Table 14.10 and Table 14.13 list the estimate footnotes for the 2022 and 2019 estimates respectively. The differences between the estimates are most notably in silver price, recovery, and COG. An increased mining cost assumption for the 2022 estimate has resulted in an optimum pit shell that does not go as deep as the 2019 estimate. In addition, the 2022 Mineral Resource includes material within the MPC, which can now be considered available to New Pacific for reporting purposes.

 

Table 14.13 Mineral Resource comparison with previous 2019 estimate

 

  Class Tonnes (Mt) Ag (g/t) Ag (Moz)

 

2019

(cut-off 45 g/t Ag)

Measured 8.40 159 43.05
Indicated 26.99 130 112.00
Measured and Indicated 35.39 137 155.05
Inferred 9.84 112 35.55

 

2022

(cut-off 30 g/t Ag)

Measured 14.88 131 62.60
Indicated 39.38 110 139.17
Measured and Indicated 54.26 116 201.77
Inferred 4.56 88 12.95

 

 

Difference

Measured 6.48 -28 19.55
Indicated 12.39 -20 27.17
Measured and Indicated 18.87 -21 46.72
Inferred -5.28 -24 -22.60

Notes applicable to both estimates:

·CIM Definition Standards (2014) were used for reporting the Mineral Resources.
·The Qualified Person is Dinara Nussipakynova, P.Geo., of BBA, formerly employed with of AMC Consultants.
·The numbers may not compute exactly due to rounding.
·Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
2022 Mineral Resource notes:
·Mineral Resources are constrained by optimized pit shells at a metal price of US$22.50/oz Ag, recovery of 91% Ag and COG of 30 g/t Ag.
·Drilling results up to 25 July 2022.
2019 Mineral Resource notes:
·Mineral Resources are constrained by an optimized pit shell at a metal price of US$18.70/oz Ag and recovery of 90% Ag.
·COG is 45 g/t Ag.
·Mineral Resources are reported inside the AMC claim boundary.
·Pit optimization allows waste to extend outside the AMC to the NE and SW.
·Drilling results up to 31 December 2020.
Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2022.

 

14.11Recommendations

 

For future Mineral Resource modelling the following should be considered:

 

·At the next update of the model include all remaining drill data which missed the closing date.
·Incorporate geometallurgical attributes into the block model.
·Verify mined-out volumes by surveying historical waste dumps.
·Conduct structural analysis of available data and complete initial structural / geotechnical drilling as required.
·Update the 3D geological model to include detailed geology – deposit oxidation domaining and structures.

 

amcconsultants.com200

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The Silver Sand deposit, as currently defined, remains open for expansion at depth. While it is understood that engineering work for the pre-feasibility study is based on the current block model, it is recommended that future drilling on the deposit should consider the following:

 

·Infill drilling to upgrade areas of high-grade mineralization within the current Inferred resource area.
·Additional drilling around the current Mineral Resources, where the deposit remains open at depth.

 

The QP also notes that there has been no modern district scale exploration outside of Silver Sand deposit. It is recommended that additional drilling be completed at the other prospects to assess for the potential for Mineral Resources.

 

amcconsultants.com201

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

15Mineral Reserve estimates

 

15.1Mineral Reserve estimates

 

Open pit life-of-mine (LOM) plans and resulting open pit Mineral Reserves are determined based on a silver price of US$23/oz Ag. Reserves stated in this report are dated effective as of 19 June 2024. The mine design and Mineral Reserve estimate have been completed to a level appropriate for pre- feasibility studies.

 

The ore material is converted from Mineral Resource to Mineral Reserve based primarily on positive cash flow pit optimization results, pit design, and geological classification of Measured and Indicated resources. The in-situ value is derived from the estimated grade and certain modifying factors.

 

The Silver Sand project will be mined using a conventional open pit mining method, utilizing 115 t hydraulic backhoe excavators and haulage by off-highway 72 t capacity rear dump haul trucks. Mining is anticipated to be completed by a contract mining company. The majority of the excavated material will require drilling and blasting. Drilling and blasting is performed on 10 m benches. Flitch height is variable depending on the material being mined. Overburden and waste will be mined in 5 m flitches and ore is to be mined in 3.3 m flitches. Ore will be hauled to a crusher or to run-of- mine (ROM) stockpiles. Waste will be hauled to external and in-pit waste rock dumps.

 

The open pit Mineral Reserves are reported within a pit design based on open pit optimization results. The Mineral Reserves represent the economically mineable part of Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources and are presented in Table 15.1.

 

Table 15.1 Mineral Reserve estimate as of 19 June 2024

 

  Tonnes (Mt) Ag (g/t) Ag (Moz)
Proven 15.09 121 58.84
Probable 36.92 98 116.58
Proven & Probable 52.01 105 175.42

 

Notes:

·CIM Definition Standards (2014) were used for reporting the Mineral Reserves.

·The Qualified Person is Wayne Rogers, P.Eng. of AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd.
·Cut-off grade of 27 g/t Ag for material inside the AMC, and 29 g/t Ag outside the AMC limit based on operating costs of 16.71 US$/t of ore, 91% Ag metallurgical recovery, 0.50 US$/oz Ag treatment and selling costs, 6% royalty within AMC, 12% royalty outside AMC, and 99.00% payable silver.

·Ag price assumed is US$23.00 per troy ounce.
·Mineral Reserves include dilution and mining recovery.
·Reserves are converted from Resources through the process of pit optimization, pit design, production schedule, and supported by a positive cash flow model.
·The totals may not sum due to rounding.
·Probable Mineral Reserves are based on Indicated Mineral Resources only.
·Proven Mineral Reserves are based on Measured Mineral Resources only.
·Ag metal (Moz) represents contained metal.

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

The majority of the Mineral Reserves lie within the AMC claim boundary. There is not a reporting restriction to within the AMC claim boundary as an agreement has been reached with COMIBOL regarding the surrounding MPC. Table 15.2 shows the split of the Mineral Reserve within the AMC boundary and outside the boundary.

 

amcconsultants.com202

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 15.2 Mineral Reserves within and outside the AMC

 

Resource category Inside AMC boundary Outside AMC boundary
Tonnes (Mt) Ag (g/t) Ag (Moz) Tonnes (Mt) Ag (g/t) Ag (Moz)
Proven 14.79 122 57.86 0.30 99 0.97
Probable 33.08 99 105.04 3.85 93 11.54
Proven & Probable 47.86 106 162.90 4.15 94 12.52

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

15.2Method

 

To convert Mineral Resources to Mineral Reserves, the following process was applied to Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources, and is described in more detail in Section 16:

 

·Determination of cut-off grades based on metal prices and costs, processing costs and metallurgical recoveries, incremental ore mining costs, and general and administration costs.
·Selection of an appropriate mining dilution and mining recovery method to convert the resource block model into a mining block model.
·Definition of ultimate and interim pit shells using the pseudoflow algorithm as implemented in GEOVIA Whittle software.
·Design of ultimate and staged pit designs based on the selected pit shells, geotechnical, and operational mining considerations.
·Derivation of a mine plan based on the pit designs, mining equipment operational constraints, and productive capacities by material type to achieve mill feed targets and associated material movement.
·Derivation of mining costs based on the mine plan.
·Economic evaluation of the mine plan as presented in Section 22.

 

15.3Mining cut-off grade

 

The cut-off grade applied for reporting the Mineral Reserves is 27 g/t Ag within the AMC and 29 g/t Ag outside the AMC. Assumptions made to derive the COG included mining costs, processing costs and metallurgical recoveries. Table 15.3 summarizes the calculation of the open pit cut-off grade for the Silver Sand project. Inputs were either based on contractor quotes, derived from the 2023 PEA, or provided by New Pacific. The overall pit slopes used for the pit optimization were based on the Itasca (2023) Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Study for PFS Silver Sand Project and range from 45° to 47°. This includes allowances for ramps and geotechnical catch benches.

 

amcconsultants.com203

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 15.3 Cut-off grade input parameters and calculations for Mineral Reserves

 

Input Unit Value
Silver price $/oz Ag 23
Silver metallurgical recovery % 91
Payable silver % 99
Selling & transport costs $/oz Ag 0.50
Mining cost $/t mined 2.00
Incremental mining cost $/t mined / 10 m bench 0.04
Process cost $/t ore mined 14.20
TSF operating cost $/t ore mined 0.65
G&A cost $/t ore mined 1.86
Royalty % (inside AMC / outside AMC) 6 / 12
Cut-off grade Ag g/t (inside AMC / outside AMC) 27 / 29

 

Notes:

TSF cost refers to Tailings Storage Facility costs.
G&A cost refers to General and Administration costs.

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

15.4Mining dilution and recovery factors

 

In the process of estimating the Mineral Reserves, dilution and mining recovery factors were applied to the Mineral Resource using a block model regularization process.

 

The resource block model used as a basis for the study was ag_sand_mod_2022_fin.dm and created by AMC for the 2023 Silver Sand PEA. The model was a rotated sub-cell model with parent cell dimensions of 5 m x 10 m x 5 m.

 

Prior to the regularization process, the mined-out blocks were removed from the resource model to prevent additional dilution in the regularized model.

 

AMC Consultants regularized the resource model to a uniform size of 5 m x 5 m x 5 m to better reflect the minimum parcel size that can selectively be mined. This block size is considered appropriate for the backhoe excavator loading units anticipated to be used by the mining contractor. The parent cell size of the regularized model is unchanged in the X and Z directions and split in half in the Y direction. Sub-celling is maintained at the surface topography and along mined-out boundaries.

 

Globally, the metal content in the sub-cell resource model and the regularized model is the same. However, the distribution between resource categories changes slightly after the regularization due to the resource category with the maximum volume is selected.

 

The average dilution and mining recovery factors are tabulated in Table 15.4.

 

Table 15.4 Mining dilution and recovery parameters

 

Input Unit Value
Recovery % 92
Dilution % 10

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com204

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

To achieve the projected dilution, the following operational recommendations are proposed:

 

Diligent and experienced grade control and sampling personnel are employed.
Rapid turn-around of grade control assays.
Timely feedback of assay data into mine planning activities.
Blast control and monitoring of blast movement are utilized.

 

15.5Open pit optimization

 

The economic pit optimization for the Silver Sand project was conducted using GEOVIA Whittle 4.8.0. The mining block model used for the pit optimization was prepared using Datamine™ software and is based on the resource geological model.

 

Slope angles for the pit optimization were based on “PPT-682.002.03-Recommended IRAk Stage 2-R0.pdf” (Itasca, 2023), with adjustments to allow for haulage ramps in the designs. Overall pit slope angles vary by slope domain, ranging from 45° to 47°. This includes allowances for ramps and geotechnical catch benches. See Table 15.5 for the different slope domains, and Section 16.3 for additional information regarding geotechnical considerations.

 

Table 15.5 Slope angles for pit optimization

 

Azimuth (°) Overall slope angle (°)
0 – 110 47
110 – 250 45
250 – 360 47

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

The pseudoflow pit optimization algorithm, as implemented in GEOVIA Whittle software, was used to determine the ultimate pit shell for Silver Sand. The pseudoflow algorithm achieves the same result as the Lerchs-Grossman algorithm but is more computationally efficient. All economic inputs used in the pit optimization follow Table 15.3. The pit optimization was not constrained to the AMC limit and community limits.

 

The results of the pit optimization are summarized in Table 15.6 and Figure 15.1. These results are based on the pit shells produced during the optimization.

 

The graph in Figure 15.1 shows indicative discounted pit values for each revenue factor (RF) in terms of “best case”, “worst case”, and undiscounted values. The best case gives the maximum indicative discounted value and requires that each shell be mined sequentially. The indicative value calculated for the best case is theoretical and cannot be practically achieved for an optimization conducted in small revenue factor increments because there is not enough horizontal width between mining phases to practically mine them. The worst case assumes that the deposit is mined on a bench-by-bench basis across all shells and gives the lowest discounted value. Discounted values are based on a discount rate of 8% per year.

 

The pit optimization was conducted on a direct-feed basis for processing and without a pre-production period restriction. Discounted values were estimated using a fixed processing throughput limit of 4.0 Mtpa. Since the Silver Sand project is planned to be a contractor-run operation, the owner will not be required to purchase a mining fleet and is not anticipating additional costs for minor changes to the mining rate, aside from the variable cost paid to the contractor. Capital costs were not considered in the optimization process because they are not expected to vary materially for the selection of the ultimate pit.

 

amcconsultants.com205

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 15.6 Pit optimization results

 

Pit shell Revenue factor Indicative disc. value Undiscounted
value
Ore
tonnes
Waste
tonnes
Total
tonnes
Strip
ratio
Ag process feed
grade
Incremental mining
cost
Incremental disc. value
of ore
Best case Worst case
- - US$ M US$ M US$ M kt kt kt t:t g/t US$/t of ore US$/t of ore
1 0.10 11.5 11.5 11.5 60 37 97 0.6 348.6 0.00 0.00
2 0.15 42.4 42.4 42.7 348 358 707 1.0 234.3 4.39 214.11
3 0.20 106.5 106.5 109.1 1,239 1,504 2,744 1.2 178.5 4.72 143.93
4 0.25 387.2 387.0 425.5 6,419 10,592 17,011 1.7 144.6 5.84 108.33
5 0.30 738.2 727.5 883.6 15,326 31,665 46,992 2.1 131.9 7.06 77.62
6 0.35 910.6 885.1 1,141.0 21,366 45,190 66,555 2.1 125.2 6.88 54.65
7 0.40 1,009.0 970.4 1,304.4 25,948 56,436 82,384 2.2 120.3 7.52 40.10
8 0.45 1,190.5 1,120.0 1,658.1 36,275 94,695 130,971 2.6 114.6 10.49 32.06
9 0.50 1,276.9 1,188.3 1,854.8 43,408 120,800 164,208 2.8 110.6 10.92 21.68
10 0.55 1,301.2 1,205.9 1,914.7 45,763 130,916 176,679 2.9 109.5 12.97 17.78
11 0.60 1,321.3 1,218.8 1,967.4 48,253 142,344 190,597 2.9 108.2 13.56 13.23
12 0.65 1,331.5 1,223.8 1,994.2 49,626 150,250 199,875 3.0 107.6 16.48 11.12
13 0.70 1,338.4 1,225.9 2,013.5 50,788 157,795 208,582 3.1 107.1 18.49 7.75
14 0.75 1,343.6 1,225.2 2,028.8 51,844 166,599 218,443 3.2 106.7 22.08 4.28
15 0.80 1,347.0 1,224.6 2,038.4 52,714 173,799 226,514 3.3 106.3 22.76 3.17
16 0.85 1,349.3 1,222.9 2,044.9 53,534 180,529 234,063 3.4 105.8 22.76 0.73
17 0.90 1,350.5 1,220.5 2,048.4 54,075 186,018 240,092 3.4 105.6 27.63 -2.33
18 0.95 1,351.3 1,216.7 2,051.2 54,921 193,798 248,719 3.5 105.1 25.42 -3.43
19 1.00 1,351.4 1,213.9 2,051.7 55,250 197,657 252,907 3.6 105.0 30.57 -8.21
20 1.05 1,351.0 1,204.3 2,050.8 55,998 206,670 262,668 3.7 104.5 29.32 -13.48
21 1.10 1,350.6 1,200.4 2,049.5 56,359 211,577 267,936 3.8 104.4 34.62 -11.87
22 1.15 1,349.6 1,191.7 2,046.5 56,902 218,668 275,569 3.8 104.0 31.92 -17.91
23 1.20 1,348.7 1,186.5 2,044.0 57,242 223,190 280,432 3.9 103.8 33.67 -17.63
24 1.25 1,346.2 1,174.6 2,036.1 57,923 235,306 293,229 4.1 103.6 43.70 -21.30
25 1.30 1,345.2 1,169.4 2,033.2 58,168 239,111 297,279 4.1 103.4 37.43 -25.04
26 1.35 1,343.3 1,160.3 2,027.1 58,559 246,597 305,157 4.2 103.2 44.87 -28.16
27 1.40 1,339.1 1,152.1 2,013.6 59,391 258,899 318,290 4.4 102.8 42.26 -14.87
28 1.45 1,337.9 1,148.5 2,009.6 59,618 262,441 322,059 4.4 102.6 41.81 -21.28

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com206

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 15.1 Pit optimization results

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

Pit shell 17 (RF 0.90) was selected to guide the ultimate pit design, with the following justification:

 

The RF 0.90 shell satisfies New Pacific’s objective of maximizing ore tonnes.
The incremental discounted value per tonne of ore is negative beyond the RF 0.9 shell.
The RF 0.90 shell contains 98% of the ore tonnes in the RF 1.0 shell and 6% less waste material.

 

15.6Mine design

 

An ultimate pit was designed using the GEOVIA Whittle optimization shells as a guide. The ultimate pit has been divided into eight phases; refer to Section 16 for a detailed description of the phasing plan. Figure 15.2 presents the final pit geometry used to report the Mineral Reserve.

 

amcconsultants.com207

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 15.2 Final pit geometry

  

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

15.7Items impacting Mineral Reserves

 

The Qualified Person is not aware of any mining, metallurgical, infrastructure, permitting, environmental, political or other factors that may materially affect the current Mineral Reserves.

 

amcconsultants.com208

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

16Mining methods

 

16.1General description

 

Silver Sand comprises of one Main Pit split into eight phases (MP1, MP2, MP3, MP4, MP5, MP6, MP7, and MP8). Silver Sand will be mined using a conventional open pit approach of drilling and blasting ore and waste rock, with material mined by hydraulic excavators loading into off-highway rear dump haul trucks. Ore will be hauled directly to the primary crusher or to the run-of-mine (ROM) ore pad located adjacent to the ore processing plant. Waste will be hauled to ex-pit waste rock dumps. When possible, waste rock will be backfilled into the mined-out pit void once mining has progressed sufficiently to allow this activity to be completed safely.

 

16.2Hydrogeological and hydrological considerations

 

AMC Consultants engaged Hydrotechnica Ltd (Hydrotechnica) to review hydrology and hydrogeology studies prepared by P.C.A. Ingenieros Consultores S.A. and Itasca Chile SpA (Itasca), respectively. AMC Consultants has adopted the findings of Hydrotechnica for this Technical Report, and for which the QP accepts responsibility. The following information was reviewed:

 

Itasca (April 2024) Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Study for PFS Silver Sand Project.
Itasca, October 2022. Hydrological and hydrogeological conceptual study – Silver Sand Project. ITASCA-INF-682.002.01.
P.C.A. Ingenieros Consultores S.A., March 2023. DISEÑO PRELIMINAR “PRESA MACHACAMARCA”, INFORME FINAL.

 

16.2.1Hydrology and surface water management

 

Hydrotechnica reviewed rainfall data from the Tacobamba and Machacamarca weather stations and evaporation data from the Machacamarca basin, as presented in the report completed by P.C.A. This data was used to estimate effective daily rainfall and indicate an annual wet season of approximately four months. To predict the maximum amount of rainfall that could occur in a 24-hour period, an extreme rainfall analysis was conducted using frequencies of 25, 50, 100, 500, and 1000 years.

 

Diversion channels will be located up-slope of the open pit mining areas to intercept surface water run-off and direct it towards natural drainage channels. Open pit catchment areas, presented in Table 16.1, were estimated using the pit phase designs and a digital terrain model. These estimates were used to calculate pumping requirements. Catchment areas and diversion channels are presented in Figure 16.1, Figure 16.2, and Figure 16.3.

 

Table 16.1 Open pit catchment areas and corresponding diversion channels

 

Pit Catchment area (m2) Diversion channel ID
Pit 1 (MP1) n/a Pit 1
Pit 2 (MP2) 130,292 Pit 2, 3,4 & 6
Pit 3 (MP3) 105,793 Pit 2, 3,4 & 6
Pit 4 (MP4) 62,004 Pit 2, 3,4 & 6
Pit 5 (MP5) 155,782 Pit 5 U & 5 L
Pit 6 (MP6) 592,623 Pit 2, 3,4 & 6
Pit 7 (MP7) 343,955 Pit 7
Pit 8 (MP8) 786,367 Pit 8

Source: Hydrotechnica, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com209

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 16.1 Surface water catchments for MP2, MP3, MP4, and MP5

 

Source: Hydrotechnica, 2024.

 

Figure 16.2 Surface water catchments for MP6 and MP7

 

Source: Hydrotechnica, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com210

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 16.3 Surface water catchments for MP7 and MP8

 

Source: Hydrotechnica, 2024.

 

MP1 will be free draining (cut into the slope and open down gradient). Sumps will be required in all other phases. To estimate pumping requirements, a one-in-25-year, 24-hour duration rainfall event was applied to each of the open pit catchment areas with an 80% “run-off coefficient” (to allow for 20% infiltration and evaporation). A pumping capacity of 15,000 m3/day and a drawdown period of five days were assumed. The estimated pumping requirements are summarized in Table 16.2.

 

Table 16.2 Estimated pumping requirements

 

Catchment Daily volume (1 in 25 year, 24-hour event) Typical pump capacity (m3/day) Number of pumps
Pit 2 57,855 15,000 1.0
Pit 3 46,976 15,000 1.0
Pit 4 27,532 15,000 1.0
Pit 5 69,173 15,000 1.0
Pit 6 263,148 15,000 4.0
Pit 7 152,730 15,000 3.0
Pit 8 349,178 15,000 5.0

Source: Hydrotechnica, 2024.

 

16.2.2Hydrogeology and groundwater management

 

At the time of Hydrotechnica’s review, no site-specific hydrogeological data was available. Three boreholes were installed with standpipe piezometers to measure a deep-water table, located between approximately 3910 – 4020 metres above sea level.

 

Water table contour maps are presented by Itasca for two aquifer systems: shallow and deep. Itasca notes there is uncertainty in the contours of the shallow system.

 

amcconsultants.com211

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The level of the contours, approximately 50 m below ground level suggests an aquifer in the shallow fractured rock, potentially compartmentalized by faults. However, there are numerous springs, particularly to the north and west of Main Pit 4 (MP4), suggesting a shallower groundwater system. The source of water in the nearby springs and wetlands is not known, some of the springs appear associated with the shallow alluvial-colluvial system, while others may issue at geological contacts or structures in the fresh rock.

 

Itasca refers to published literature values for a potential range in hydraulic conductivity (the key hydraulic property) for three “domains”:

 

UH, the alluvial system which comprises alluvium, colluvium, and glacial deposits. The hydraulic conductivity range assigned is 10 to 100 m/d.
UH2, the relatively shallow Tarapaya Formation and Breccia Diatreme, which geotechnical logging shows to have an average RQD of 66%, equivalent to a ‘fair’ rock quality designation. The hydraulic conductivity range assigned is 1.0 to 0.1 m/d; and,
The remaining fresh rock underlies the Tarapaya formation where present and extends to depth across the project area. Geotechnical logging shows this domain to have an average RQD of 86%, equivalent to a “good” rock quality designation. The hydraulic conductivity range assigned is 0.01 to 0.0001 m/d.

 

Itasca presents a basic estimate of groundwater inflow to the open pits using the hydraulic gradient from the stand-pipe piezometers (0.5) and a hydraulic conductivity of 0.005 m/d. Inflow is not considered from the alluvial system (UH1) nor the Tarapaya Formation (UH2). The inflow estimate for MP4 is 9.6 L/s. This is very low and would likely be managed by a combination of evaporation and sump pumping. Higher inflows are likely from discrete permeable horizons, such as the north-south orientated geological structures.

 

Dewatering boreholes (and a hydraulic curtain) are not considered appropriate for the PFS based on the inflows predicted by Itasca. Instead, horizontal drain holes are recommended for depressurization.

 

16.2.3Recommendations

 

Hydrotechnica recommends the following steps be taken to further develop an understanding of the hydrological and hydrogeological parameters impacting the Silver Sand project:

 

Review of drillhole records and geological data for improved conceptual understanding of the shallow groundwater system.
Sampling of the springs and wetland to the north and west of the Main Pit.
Shallow drilling (auger or diamond drilling) to install shallow piezometers and prove the depth of the colluvial system, and whether it supports a water table upstream of the springs and within the wetland area.
Permeability testing of the existing standpipe piezometers.
Construction of a trial dewatering borehole in the alluvial deposits of the main river channel to investigate its hydrogeological properties and allow for a targeted dewatering strategy, if required.
Construction of at least one trial dewatering borehole into a major fault structure and surrounding piezometer array to investigate fault properties and surrounding fracture connectivity.
The installation of multi-level vibrating wire piezometers is recommended to improve the understanding of the hydrogeological system. The following targets are recommended:
¾At least one major and one local fault structure;

 

amcconsultants.com212

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

¾The shallow aquifer system in hill-slope colluvium (further to positive results from exploratory drilling);
¾The Tarapaya Formation (where saturated);
¾UH3 orthogonal to the existing standpipe piezometers for triangulation of groundwater pressure; and,
¾UH3 north and south of the river.

 

16.3Geotechnical considerations

 

The QP has reviewed the geotechnical work completed for the open pit and adopted the findings for this Technical Report. The following information was provided to support the QP’s, findings and conclusions:

 

Itasca (April 2024) Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Study for PFS Silver Sand Project.
Itasca (October 2022) Hydrological and Hydrogeological Conceptual Study – Silver Sand Project.
Itasca (May 2023) PPT-682.002.04 – Preliminary Recommendation of Inter-ramp Angles for Silver Sand Open Pit.
Core photographs of 2022 geotechnical drillholes.
Drillhole historical data.

 

16.3.1Geotechnical investigation

 

Geotechnical investigations completed to support the geotechnical assessments for the PFS include:

 

Historical drilling and logging from the 2017 and 2022 programs. In the 2022 geotechnical campaign, there were 15 geotechnical drillholes of 2,650 metres completed for geotechnical data collection. Most of the core logging includes geological parameters, RQD, and basic geotechnical features such as core recovery and fracture count.
Oriented drill core measurements of historical geological drilling campaigns and the 2022 geotechnical campaign.
Laboratory testing of typical intact rock units. For the PFS study, 52 Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) tests, 63 Triaxial Compressive Strength (Tx) tests, and 50 Tensile Strength (Ti) tests have been undertaken.

 

16.3.2Rock mass characterization

 

16.3.2.1Geotechnical domain

 

The rock mass at Silver Sand was divided into five geotechnical domains based on the lithology domains. Table 16.3 presents the geotechnical domains and their correlation with the lithological units for the pit and areas within 150 m away from the pit. Figure 16.4 shows the spatial distribution of the geotechnical domains over the pre-mining topography.

 

Table 16.3 Geotechnical domains and their correlation with lithological units

 

Lithology Description Geotechnical domain
SSdOtl-BHY Breccia Diatreme UG1
SsdOtl-HEM, SSdTar-SSN La Puerta Formation Sandstone – Nodular UG2
SsdLap-SSM La Puerta Formation Sandstone – Massive UG3
SsdLap-SSS-SSX

La Puerta Formation Sandstone – Dune Cross Bedded, Sandstone Streaky

UG4
SSTar-SLT-SST Tarapaya Formation Siltstone (Upper) – Sandstone (Upper) UG5

Source: Itasca, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com213

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 16.4 Spatial distribution of the geotechnical domains (left: isotropic view, right: plan view)

 

Source: Itasca, 2024.

 

16.3.2.2Structural model

 

The structural model developed for the PFS contains two regional faults, 14 local faults, and more than 50 minor faults, as shown in Figure 16.5.

 

Figure 16.5 Structural model (blue: regional; red: local; green: minor)

 

Source: Itasca, 2024.

 

Based on stereographic analysis of oriented structural data, a total of three structural domains have been defined for the Silver Sand project. Table 16.4 presents the structural domains and their correlation with the lithological units for the pit. Figure 16.6 shows the spatial distribution of the structural domains over the pre-mining topography.

 

amcconsultants.com214

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 16.4 Structural domains and their correlation with lithological units

 

Lithology Structural domain
SsdLap-SSM UG3
SsdOtl-HEM SSdTar-SSN Dom2
SSTar-SLT-SST
SsdLap-SSS-SSX Dom3
SSdOtl-BHY

Source: Itasca, 2024.

 

Figure 16.6 Spatial distribution of the structural domains (left: isotropic view, right: plan view)

 

Source: Itasca, 2024.

 

Table 16.5 presents the mean sets identified for each domain, the sets for each domain are primarily sub-vertical, with preferential dip directions from NNW to NNE and with small variations among domains.

 

amcconsultants.com215

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 16.5 Mean sets for each structural domain

 

Domain Type Set Dip (°) Dip direction (°)

 

 

 

 

 

Dom1

 

 

Joints

J1 89 81
J2 82 115
J3 83 233
J4 78 319

 

 

Faults

F1 85 82
F2 80 253
F3 80 225
F4 84 121

 

 

 

 

 

Dom2

 

 

Joints

J1 89 253
J2 83 97
J3 81 125
J4 82 229

 

 

 

Faults

F1 84 87
F2 80 253
F3 83 121
F4 82 256
F5 18 256

 

 

 

 

 

Dom3

 

 

Joints

J1 86 254
J2 85 112
J3 87 93
J4 79 225

 

 

 

Faults

F1 87 112
F2 78 84
F3 80 260
F4 82 136
F5 78 333

Source: Itasca, 2024.

 

16.3.2.3Laboratory testing

 

Table 16.6 shows a summary of tests and meters logged in the 2020 geotechnical campaign. The 35th percentile strength properties were used to develop the failure envelope for each domain. Figure 16.7 presents the test results and the Hoek-Brown failure envelope for each geotechnical domain.

 

Table 16.6 Geotechnical domains and their correlation with lithological units

 

Geotechnical domain UCS Tx Ti Metres logged
UG1 4 6 3 99
UG2 9 15 7 425
UG3 10 16 9 234
UG4 17 29 16 1460
UG5 12 17 15 426

Source: Itasca, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com216

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 16.7 Test results and the Hoek-Brown failure envelope for each geotechnical domain

 

 

Source: Itasca, 2024.

 

No Young’s modulus or Poisson’s ratio have been obtained from the UCS tests. No tests have been undertaken to obtain shear strength parameters of typical joints or faults.

 

16.3.2.4Rock mass classification

 

RQD values of core intervals were collected in core logging. Table 16.7 summarizes the mean and average RQD values for each domain.

 

Table 16.7 RQD values for each domain

 

Geotechnical domain RQD median RQD average1
UG1 70 66
UG2 90 85
UG3 93 87
UG4 92 86
UG5 73 66

Note: 1Derived from Itasca conceptual study.

 

amcconsultants.com217

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Other geotechnical parameters of RMR or Q system were not recorded / collected. The Geological Strength Index (GSI) was estimated by Itasca using the quantitative approach proposed by Cai et al. (2004), as shown in Figure 16.8 It remains unclear how the parameters of joint spacing and joint surface conditions (roughness, weathering, and infilling) are determined.

 

Figure 16.8 Boxplot of GSI or each geotechnical domain

 

Source: Itasca, 2024.

 

Overall, the data indicates generally ‘fair’ to ‘good’; rock mass conditions throughout the mining area with poorer quality rock masses being expected in UG5 and the near-surface overburden and highly weathered zone.

 

16.3.2.5Strength parameters for geotechnical design

 

The Hoek-Brown strength parameters of intact rock for geotechnical design are summarized in Table 16.8.

 

Table 16.8 Index properties and strength parameters for each domain

 

Geotechnical domain Density (kg/m3) σci P35 (MPa) mi P35 GSI P35
UG1 2500 116 16 58
UG2 2460 86 20 55
UG3 2500 119 19 61
UG4 2380 95 19 54
UG5 2400 52 14 41

Source: Itasca, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com218

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

16.3.3Slope design

 

16.3.3.1Design acceptance criteria

 

The design acceptance criteria in the PFS study are adopted based on the guidelines (Read & Stacey, 2009) for large open pit mines, and is shown in Table 16.9. Only static conditions were assessed in the PFS study.

 

Table 16.9 Design acceptance criteria values (Read & Stacey, 2009)

 

Slope scale Consequence of failure Acceptance criteria
FOS (Min.) - Static FOS (Min.) - Dynamic PoF (Max.)
Bench Low – high 1.1 - 25% – 50%

 

Inter-ramp

Low 1.15 – 1.2 1.0 25%
Moderate 1.2 1.0 20%
High 1.2 – 1.3 1.1 10%

 

Overall

Low 1.2 – 1.3 1.0 15% – 20%
Moderate 1.3 1.05 10%
High 1.3 – 1.5 1.1 5%

Notes: FOS = Factor of Safety; PoF = Probability of Failure; values in bold are adopted FOS and PoF.

 

16.3.3.2Kinematic analysis

 

A bench scale kinematic analyses were conducted using commercial software KATS (Kinematic Analysis for Slopes) to estimate the potential structural failure for three primary modes: planar, wedge, and toppling. The POF of each joint set identified in each structural domain was assessed for a design bench height of 20 m and bench face angle of 80° under the following assumed conditions and joint properties:

 

A friction angle of 30° and zero cohesion on joints.
Joint persistence of 15 m.
Dry bench face.
The 70th percentile of the back-break.
The 80th percentile of the spill length.

 

The results indicate that flexural toppling is most likely to occur due to the dominant sub-vertical trend of the joint sets. The recommended kinematic Inter-Ramp Angle (IRAk) per domain and wall orientation is shown in Figure 16.9 The slope design recommendations for the Silver Sand open pit are summarized in Table 16.10.

 

Figure 16.9 Recommended IRAk for each structural domain

 

Source: Itasca, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com219

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 16.10 Slope design recommendations

 

Domain Dom1 Dom2 Dom3
Bench height (m) 20 20 20
BFA (deg) 80 80 80
Berm width (m) 9.5 – 10.5 9.5 – 11.0 10.5 – 11.0
IRA (deg) 55 - 57 54 - 57 54 - 55

Source: Itasca, 2024.

 

16.3.3.3Inter-ramp stability analysis

 

Inter-ramp stability analyses were conducted using commercial software, FLAC2D, to develop a FOS design chart of the inter-ramp angle (IRArm) controlled by rock mass strength versus inter-ramp heights for each geotechnical domain. Two scenarios (dry and wet conditions) were analyzed under the following assumed conditions:

 

Maximum IRA of 60° and maximum inter-ramp height of 200 m.
Modelling inputs being shown in Table 16.8, with the disturbance factor D being taken as 1.0 to account for large production blasting.

Groundwater table being 25 m behind slope wall for the wet scenario.

 

The results indicate that the IRArm of 60° with the inter-ramp height of 200 m can be achieved under both dry and wet conditions for all geotechnical domains (UG1 through UG4) except UG5, which has relatively weaker rock mass strength. For UG5, the maximum inter-ramp heights are 80 m and 75 m at IRArm of 60° for dry and wet conditions, respectively. Nevertheless, it is recommended that the inter-ramp height be limited to 150 m or less, and a geotechnical berm of up to 25 m every 150 m be considered.

 

16.3.3.4Overall slope stability analysis

 

In addition to the inter-ramp stability analyses, the overall slope stability analyses have been performed for each geotechnical domain by incorporating faults which are sub-parallel to the pit slope. Two scenarios (dry and wet conditions) were considered. A total of six sections were analyzed under the following assumed conditions and model inputs:

 

·A friction angle of 35° and a cohesion of 75 kPa for faults.
Lithostatic pre-mining stress (the horizontal stresses are equal to the vertical stress).
The phreatic lines for wet conditions are estimated based on hydraulic parameters selected from literature for each hydrogeological unit.

 

The results indicate that the FOS of all sections exceeds the design criteria under both dry and wet conditions.

 

16.3.4Gap analysis

 

A geotechnical data gap analysis has been completed by AMC Consultants to determine the data confidence level for PFS and data requirements to support a feasibility study level geotechnical design for the Silver Sand project. The available data were evaluated based on the guidelines for the confidence level required for geological, hydrogeological, and geotechnical data provided in Read and Stacey (2009).

 

amcconsultants.com220

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The data gaps for the PFS are summarized below:

 

·Geotechnical parameters including intact rock strength, joint conditions, joint spacing, joint shape and roughness, weathering, and ground water condition have not been collected in geotechnical core logging. As a result, rock mass ratings cannot be determined directly from geotechnical logging but estimated from empirical estimates. The weathering horizon model (weathered, transitional, and fresh) has not been developed and considered in the slope stability assessment. As a result, the BFA and IRArm could be too steep for the near-surface overburden and weathered zone. Shear strength testing has not been undertaken on structural defects to define strength parameters of defects in each geotechnical domain. Defects may include bedding, joints, shear, and faults.
·No pumping or packer testing have been conducted to establish initial hydrogeological parameters across all geotechnical domains.

 

The results of the gap analysis indicate several important factors that required additional work. For feasibility studies, a higher level of data confidence is required, and the geotechnical and hydrogeological models will need to be updated with additional data. Recommended geotechnical data collection and interpretation tasks are outlined as below:

 

·Conduct geotechnical core logging using Bieniawski’s 1989 rock mass rating. Geotechnical parameters including intact rock strength, RQD, joint conditions, joint spacing, joint shape and roughness, weathering, and groundwater conditions should be collected in geotechnical core logging.
·Geotechnical drilling programs must include orientation of the drill core and collect structural orientation data.
·Select typical samples of typical joints from geotechnical drill cores for satellite pits and perform direct shear testing. Determine strength parameters of joints and justify design assumptions made in the PFS.
·Select typical samples of rock units from geotechnical drill cores for satellite pits and perform UCS, Tx, and Ti testing.
·Conduct packer and pumping tests to develop hydrogeological parameters and justify design assumptions made in the PFS.

 

Rock mass characterization should be updated with updated data, including:

 

·Geotechnical domain
·Structural domain
·Lithological domain
·Rock mass classification
·Weathering horizon model
·Strength parameters for geotechnical design
·Hydrogeological model

 

16.3.5Conclusions and recommendations

 

For the PFS study, the geological model, structural models (major and fabric), hydrogeological model, and rock mass characterization have been developed with variable levels of confidence. The 3D geotechnical model has allowed the geotechnical design parameters to be developed. The pit design criteria are appropriate and comply with industry norms. Methodologies used for the slope design are sound and to international standards.

 

amcconsultants.com221

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

There are two uncertainties for the project that should be explored in future studies:

 

·The extent of the weathered horizon remains unknown. The geotechnical PFS has not considered a weathered zone in the pit slope design.
·The Silver Sand project is in the medium seismic hazard zone. The pit slope stability under seismic conditions has not been assessed.

 

It is recommended to develop a weathering horizon model and collect additional geotechnical data as per Section 16.3.4 to increase the geotechnical model reliability. Geotechnical slope design criteria should be updated when further information is available and pit slope stability should be assessed under static and seismic conditions.

 

16.4Resource model for mining

 

The Mineral Resource block model used for evaluating the open pit mining potential at the Silver Sand project was ag_sand_mod_2022_fin.dm. The block model is a sub-celled, rotated model, with parent block dimensions of 5 m in the X (east) direction by 10 m in the Y (north) direction by 5 m in the Z (vertical) direction. The model was developed using Datamine™ software.

 

In the process of estimating the Mineral Reserves, dilution, and mining recovery factors were applied to the Mineral Resource using a block model regularization process. For more information, please refer to Section 15.4.

 

16.5Mine design

 

Details of the pit optimization and shell selection for the ultimate pit are provided in Section 15.5 of this report.

 

Pit shell 17 (RF 0.90) was selected to guide the ultimate pit design, with the following justification:

 

·The RF 0.90 shell satisfies New Pacific’s objective of maximizing ore tonnes.
·The incremental discounted value per tonne of ore is negative beyond the RF 0.9 shell.
·The RF 0.90 shell contains 98% of the ore tonnes in the RF 1.0 shell and 6% less waste material.

 

To enable the deferment of waste stripping and access to high-grade ore earlier in the mine life intermediate phases were designed. Pit shells 4 (RF 0.25), 5 (RF 0.30), and 8 (RF 0.45) were selected to guide pit phase designs within the footprint of the Main Pit. These shells were selected with consideration of minimum mining width requirements between pushbacks (25 m) as well as ore tonnage requirements.

 

The Main Pit is approximately 2,300 m in length, 350 m to 700 m in width, and 280 m at its deepest point. Using the selected shells as guidance, eight sub-phases were designed. The phases and their corresponding shells are summarized in Table 16.11. All pit designs were completed in accordance with the geotechnical parameters discussed in Section 16.3.

 

amcconsultants.com222

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 16.11Main Pit phases

 

Phase Pit shell
MP1 RF 0.30
MP2 RF 0.25
MP3 RF 0.30
MP4 RF 0.30
MP5 RF 0.45
MP6 RF 0.45
MP7 (ultimate pit south of Machacamarca Creek) RF 0.90
MP8 (ultimate pit north of Machacamarca Creek) RF 0.90

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

Haulage ramps were designed at a maximum 10% gradient, with widths of 21 m for double-lane traffic, and 12 m for single-lane traffic. The bottom three benches of all pits were designed with single-lane access, with one final sub-excavation bench (also known as a “goodbye cut”) in the final pit floor.

 

The ultimate pit design, Main Pit phase designs, and representative sections through the pits displaying Ag grade (g/t) are presented in Figure 16.10 to Figure 16.13.

 

amcconsultants.com223

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 16.10Ultimate pit design with long sections

 

 

amcconsultants.com224

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 16.11Section view A1 - A2 with Ag grade (g/t)

 

 

Figure 16.12Section view B1 - B2 with Ag grade (g/t)

 

 

amcconsultants.com225

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 16.13Main Pit phase designs

 

 

amcconsultants.com226

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

 

amcconsultants.com227

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

A summary of the tonnes of ore and waste contained within the ultimate pit design is presented in Table 16.12. Tonnes in Table 16.12 do not match the tonnes presented in the pit optimization results (Table 15.1) due to minor differences in whittle shell versus design, and the three smaller satellite pits have not been included due to their marginal economic value and current social and community relations concerns.

 

Table 16.12Ore and waste tonnage within the ultimate pit design

 

Item Values
Ore tonnage (Mt) 52.0
Waste tonnage (Mt) 181.9
Total tonnage (Mt) 233.9
Stripping ratio (t:t) 3.5:1

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

16.6Layout of other mining-related facilities

 

A general overview of the Silver Sand site layout showing surface infrastructure is presented in Figure 16.14. Additional information on site infrastructure is presented in Section 18.

 

amcconsultants.com228

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 16.14General site layout

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com229

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

ROM stockpiles will be constructed near the plant for low-grade, medium-grade, and high-grade ore. The capacities of the stockpiles are shown in Table 16.13. The ore stockpiles will be used to allow for blending of the different grades of ore to provide a constant feed grade to the plant for sustained periods which will assist in maximizing metallurgical recovery.

 

Table 16.13Stockpile capacities

 

Stockpile Capacity (Mt)
Low grade 3.3
Medium grade 1.1
High grade 2.0

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

Six dumping areas for waste material are planned; these include two in-pit dumps and four external dumps. Upstream of the open pit, a water dam will be constructed in the Machacamarca Creek valley using waste rock from initial waste stripping. The valley dump, located north of the water dam, will also be constructed to establish access to the mining phases north of the creek. Waste material will also be used to construct the embankment for the tailings storage facility (TSF).

 

Later in the mine life, waste will be dumped into depleted pits to take advantage of shorter haul distances. Waste dumps and their designed capacities are listed in Table 16.14. For mine closure the waste dumps will be rehabilitated by re-shaping the dumps to a final slope, capping with a layer of topsoil, and revegetating. Approximately 30 cm of topsoil will be removed from the surface of the footprint of the pits, mine roads, stockpiles, and ex-pit dumps to be stored on a topsoil stockpile for use in future rehabilitation.

 

Table 16.14Waste dump storage capacities

 

Dump ID Capacity (Mm3)
Water dam 0.72
Valley 0.43
WD1 22.9
TSF embankment 78.2
IPD1 5.1
IPD2 10.9
Topsoil stockpile 0.14

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

16.7Mining method

 

The Silver Sand project will be mined using a conventional open pit mining method, utilizing 115 t hydraulic backhoe excavators and haulage by off-highway 72 t capacity rear-dump haul trucks. Mining is anticipated to be completed by a contract mining company. The majority of the excavated material will require drilling and blasting.

 

16.7.1Drill and blast

 

Drilling and blasting will be performed on 10 m benches. Proposed drilling parameters for ore and waste are presented in Table 16.15; these parameters may be adjusted as operational experience is gained.

 

amcconsultants.com230

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 16.15Proposed drill and blast parameters

 

Parameter Unit Ore Waste
Bench height m 10 10
Burden m 4.4 4.8
Spacing m 5.1 5.5
Hole diameter mm 165 165
Subdrill m 1.0 1.0
Powder factor kg/t 0.24 0.20

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

Explosives will be stored on-site. At least four weeks of explosives storage capacity is recommended given the remoteness of the project. An Ammonium Nitrate Fuel Oil (ANFO) storage facility will be constructed and operated by the mining contractor. The site will also require two explosive magazines (one for detonators and one for high-powered explosives). The magazines will be located at least 1,000 m from other occupied infrastructure. The number of mobile manufacturing units (MMU) supplied by the contractor will depend on site arrangements. With ANFO to be stored one-site, one MMU with 12 to 18 tonnes of capacity is expected to be sufficient.

 

It is estimated that the mine will consume between 3,500 – 3,800 tonnes of ANFO per year during peak production. It is estimated that 25,000 – 30,000 blastholes per year will be required during peak production.

 

It has been assumed that in-pit dewatering will be suitable to ensure that the groundwater table remains below the bottom of the pit. Therefore, ANFO is considered suitable for the anticipated dry hole blasting conditions. ANFO is a dry and free-flowing product and can be delivered to the hole by loose pour or pneumatic loading.

 

Down-the-hole hammer drill rigs will be equipped with blasthole sampling equipment to collect samples for grade control. Where possible, blast boundaries will be designed to preserve the ore-waste contact. Separate blasts for ore and waste will be used wherever possible to eliminate the mixing of grade boundaries that result in excessive ore loss and dilution. Monitoring of material movement within blasts will be carried out to predict the post-blast position of the ore-waste boundaries.

 

Controlled blasting techniques will be used to prevent excessive movement of ore. Blasting against final pit walls will be done using specialized techniques including trim and pre-split blasting. Pre-splitting will utilize small diameter holes and will be drilled at 20 m vertical depths. Decoupled or decked explosive charges will be used for blasting along final walls. Trim blasting is expected to be required to buffer final walls against production blasts.

 

16.7.2Load and haul

 

A conventional open pit truck and excavator mining method will be employed at Silver Sand. Following drilling and blasting activities, loading will take place on variable height flitches. Waste will be mined in two 5 m flitches per bench, and ore will be mined in three 3.3 m flitches per bench. Mining ore in smaller flitches will improve ore selectivity and reduce dilution. A backhoe configuration (XCMG XE1250G excavators) will be used for mining ore and waste. The average productivity of the XE1250G excavators in blasted material is expected to be approximately 830 t/op hr.

 

amcconsultants.com231

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Ore and waste will be hauled 72 t off-highway trucks (XCMG XDR80T). Ore will be hauled to the primary crusher or the ore stockpiles. Waste will be hauled to the TSF, external, and in-pit waste dumps.

 

16.7.3Stockpile rehandling

 

Stockpiled material will be reclaimed as required to meet grade blending requirements at the plant. The high-grade stockpile will be reclaimed with a front-end loader (XCMG XC958U) to feed material directly into the primary crusher. Stockpiled low and medium-grade material will be rehandled using hydraulic excavators (XCMG XE700D) and 65 t off-highway trucks (XCMG XDR70T).

 

Stockpiles were designed according to the storage requirements of the tactical schedule (see Section 16.9). Peak storage requirements do not occur simultaneously, which will allow the mine to expand stockpiles into underused areas of the stockpile platform.

 

16.7.4Ancillary equipment

 

Ancillary equipment requirements have been estimated based on total production fleet numbers and operational experience. Activities considered when selecting the ancillary equipment fleet include:

 

·Dust suppression and haul road maintenance.
·Waste dump construction and maintenance.
·Servicing of the production fleet.
·Clean-up and preparation of drilling and digging areas.
·Topsoil clearing.

 

The support fleet consists of three 50-tonne dozers (such as the CAT D9) that will be used for clearing topsoil, constructing waste dumps, the TSF embankment, and managing stockpiles. The dozers will also be used for developing pioneering roads to access mining and dumping areas at the start of the mine life. During production, the dozers will provide support in the pits and waste dumps. At the end of the mine life, the dozer fleet will be used for reclamation activities, such as re-contouring of disturbed areas.

 

In addition, three motor graders with 5 m blades (such as the CAT 16) graders will be required for road maintenance, drill pattern leveling, and post-mining reclamation. Two water trucks will be used as required for dust suppression on haul roads as well as mining and dumping areas. When not required for stockpile reclaim, the front-end loader (XCMG XC958U) will be used for in-pit support and spill-rock clean-up on haul roads. Equipment numbers reflect planned operating requirements; the mining contractor may keep additional pieces of key ancillary mining equipment on site to ensure that adequate backup is available.

 

16.8Strategic mining schedule

 

16.8.1Approach

 

The strategic mining schedule was developed using Minemax Scheduler 7 software (Minemax). Minemax is a schedule optimizer that seeks to maximize the discounted operating cash flows while honouring constraints related to processing and mining inputs. The objective of the strategic schedule is to maximize the net present value (NPV) of the plan while achieving a realistic mining sequence and maintaining a steady plant throughput rate. The strategic schedule was developed on an annual basis using a discount rate of 8% per annum.

 

amcconsultants.com232

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The main inputs to the strategic schedule include the regularized mining model, the pit designs discussed in Section 16.5, preliminary external and in-pit waste dump designs, and haulage cycle times. To estimate cycle times, a comprehensive haulage network model was developed using Micromine Alastri’s Haul Infinity software. Cycle times were defined from the centroid of each bench to each destination. The following scheduling constraints were applied when developing the strategic schedule:

 

·Achieve planned plant feed tonnage of 4 Mtpa. Including a 3-month ramp-up period in year one for a total 3.7 Mtpa feed.
·Maximum stockpile capacity of 5 Mt.
·Produce a smooth total material movement and haul truck requirement.
·Pre-strip sufficient waste material to achieve TSF embankment and water dam construction requirements.
·Limit vertical advance rate to 10 benches per year, per phase.
·Limit the number of phases mined to a maximum of four per year.

 

16.8.2Strategic schedule mining sequence

 

To optimize the overall value of the project and the sequence of mining, the value of each pit phase was estimated. The value, defined as the indicative undiscounted cash flow per tonne of mineralized material, accounts for preliminary mining costs, G&A, and processing costs.

 

The projected value from each source and consideration of practical scheduling constraints provided a basis for the order in which the pits are scheduled. The indicative value by mining area is shown in Figure 16.15.

 

Figure 16.15Indicative value by mining area

 

  

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

MP2, MP3, and MP4 are the highest-value phases, but they are located north of the Machacamarca Creek. The water dam spanning the creek valley needs to be constructed before they can be mined. Therefore, phases MP1, MP5, and MP7 are mined first in Year -2 and waste material from these phases is used to construct the water dam. More information on the water dam is presented in Section 18.

 

amcconsultants.com233

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

In addition to considering the value by mining area when developing the preferred mining sequence, consideration was also given to mining in a sequence that supports backfilling the pit with waste from phase MP8.

 

During the pre-strip period (Year -2 and Year -1), the schedule is driven predominately by waste stripping to achieve TSF embankment construction requirements. Other activities during the pre-strip period include haul road construction, mine development, and some ore stockpiling.

 

16.8.3Strategic schedule summary

 

Multiple strategic mine plans were developed to test the project’s NPV on a pre-tax basis against different silver production profiles, mining rates, and stockpile sizes.

 

A strategic mine plan resulting in annual payable output exceeding 15 Moz of silver in the first three years of production was selected for this study. Relative to the other plans considered, this mine plan produced a value close to the highest NPV case, a stable production profile, limited stockpile reclamation costs, and was in line with New Pacific’s corporate goals.

 

Mining is planned to extend over 13 years, excluding the 2-year pre-production period. An ex-pit production rate of 17.5 Mtpa is adequate to achieve the plant feed target of 4.0 Mtpa. This included consideration of the vertical advance rate. The LOM ex-pit total material movement (TMM) profile is presented in Figure 16.16.

 

Figure 16.16Total material mined by phase

 

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com234

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

MP1, MP5, and MP7 are mined first in Year -2 and waste material from these phases is used to construct the water dam and TSF embankment. Two years of pre-production mining are required to achieve the TSF embankment and water dam construction requirements. Once the water dam is constructed, higher-value phases MP2, MP3, and MP4 are mined as the strategic schedule targets high-grade and low strip-ratio ore. Mining in MP7 is expedited to take advantage of short-hauling waste from MP8, towards the end of mining.

 

16.8.4Strategic schedule process feed

 

The strategic schedule confirmed that stockpiling and reclaiming plant feed allows the ex-pit mining profile to be smoothed, and revenue to be brought forward by maximizing head grade based on available feedstock.

 

The head grade to the process plant is over 160 g/t in Year 1 and over 130 g/t for the first three years of production. Plant production includes a 3-month ramp-up in Year 1. Feeding low-grade ore during ramp-up was not included in the strategic schedule. Low-grade feed was incorporated into the tactical schedule discussed in Section 16.9.

 

The strategic schedule process feed tonnes and grade profile are presented in Figure 16.17. Figure 16.18 shows the strategic mine plan stockpile balance.

 

Figure 16.17Process feed tonnes and grade

 

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com235

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 16.18Strategic mine plan stockpile balance

 

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

16.9Tactical mining schedule

 

16.9.1Approach

 

The life-of-mine tactical mining schedule is a refined, detailed schedule that uses the strategic schedule as a guide for mine sequencing, total material movement, plant feed, and waste dumping strategy. The lengths of scheduling periods were reduced early in the schedule to provide sufficient detail to ensure that the mining sequence is practical and achievable. Haulage is estimated for each parcel and is optimized to minimize haulage for the entire schedule based on the sequence constraints.

 

The Deswik suite of software was used to develop the tactical schedule. Tactical schedule results were used to develop detailed equipment fleet requirements, the basis for Mineral Reserves, and mine operating and capital cost estimation.

 

The tactical schedule considered:

 

·The strategic schedule developed in Minemax.
·Phased pit designs.
·In-pit and external waste dump designs.
·TSF construction requirements.
·Haulage profiles: in-pit ramps, pioneering roads, and dump access.
·Fleet sizes and productivities.
·Consistent bench sequencing.
·Vertical advance rates and proximity of mining equipment.
·Advanced destination scheduling in Deswik.LHS (Deswik’s haulage modelling module).
·Material flows as shown in Figure 16.19.

 

amcconsultants.com236

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 16.19Tactical schedule material flow

 

 

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

16.9.2Input parameters

 

16.9.2.1Mining inventory

 

The ROM inventory for each phase was calculated in Deswik and is summarized in Table 16.16. Only economic material classified as a Measured or Indicated Resource was considered as ore.

 

Table 16.16ROM inventory for tactical schedule

 

Phase Total tonnes (Mt) Ore tonnes (Mt) Waste tonnes (Mt) Strip Ratio1 (t:t)
MP1 9.73 3.96 5.77 1.46
MP2 11.71 3.73 7.98 2.14
MP3 14.25 4.71 9.50 2.03
MP4 7.67 1.19 6.49 5.47
MP5 9.00 1.55 7.46 4.82
MP6 73.76 17.45 56.3 3.23
MP7 27.79 7.13 20.66 2.90
MP8 79.97 12.30 67.67 5.50
Total 233.89 52.01 181.88 3.50

 

Notes:

1.Strip ratio includes material mined during pre-production period.

2.  The ore tonnage includes a dilution rate of 10% and a mining recovery rate of 92%. A COG of 27 g/t Ag was applied to ore within the AMC limit and a COG of 29 g/t was applied for ore outside of the AMC limit.

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

16.9.2.2Material destinations

 

The tactical schedule included advanced destination scheduling to model material movements as follows:

 

·Ag ≥ 90 g/t: HG stockpile or direct feed to plant.
·60 g/t ≤ Ag < 90 g/t: MG stockpile or direct feed to plant.
·COG g/t ≤ Ag < 60 g/t: LG stockpile or direct feed to plant.
·Ag < COG g/t: in-pit and external waste dumps.

 

amcconsultants.com237

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Note that the HG and VHG stockpiles were separate during the strategic schedule but have been combined for the tactical schedule because very little material was considered VHG and it was a short-lived stockpile. The pits, phases, and dumps are all divided by bench and smaller scheduling parcels.

 

The pit inventory was aggregated into schedule blocks of dimensions 50 mE x 50 mN x 10 mZ for each individual pit phase and bench. Waste is to be mined on a 5 m flitch and ore is to be mined on a 3.3 m flitch.

 

The waste dumps were aggregated into 100 mE x 100 mN x 10 mZ blocks within lifts to model haulage as the waste dump faces advance.

 

The schedule block aggregation size for the pit and dumping destinations is considered appropriate to represent the required granularity of mining and dumping for the tactical mining schedule.

 

16.9.2.3Scheduling assumptions

 

The start date of the tactical schedule is Year -2. Two years of pre-production mining beginning in Year -2 are required to achieve TSF embankment and water dam construction requirements. Year -2 was sequenced in months, Years -1 and 1 were sequenced in quarters, and the remainder of the mine life was sequenced in annual periods. 350 operating days per year were used in the tactical schedule. Mining constraints applied to the tactical schedule include a minimum distance of 50 metres between excavators, a maximum vertical advance rate of 10 benches per year (with a minimum threshold of 100,000 tonnes), and a maximum of 4 active mining phases per year.

 

The process plant throughput capacity targets were provided by Halyard for use in mine scheduling. It is assumed that the plant will require a 3-month ramp-up period starting in Year 1. The plant will run at 50% capacity in month 1, 66.7% capacity in month 2, and will reach full throughput in month 3. Steady-state plant throughput will be 4 million tonnes per year.

 

16.9.2.4Fleet assumptions

 

The mine fleet productivity assumptions used in the tactical schedule were derived from the experience of the QP. These are summarized in Table 16.17.

 

Table 16.17Mine fleet productivity assumptions

 

  Unit XE1250G XE700D XC958U XDR80T XDR70T Epiroc D65
Equipment type   Excavator Excavator Loader Truck Truck Drill

Use criteria

  Ore &
waste
mining
Ore reclaim
from LG &
MG stockpiles
Ore reclaim
from HG
stockpile
Ore &
waste
mining
Ore reclaim
from LG & MG
stockpiles
Production
drilling
Mechanical availability % 85 85 85 85 85 85
Utilization % 85 85 85 85 85 85
Operating efficiency % 85 85 85 87.5 87.5 82.5
Productivity t/h 830 585 530 72 891 18 m/hr
Operating hours per year h/year 5,183 5,183 5,183 5,310 5,310 5,007

 

Notes:

1 Based on LOM average cycle time 46 mins.

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com238

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

16.9.2.5Haulage cycle estimation

 

A comprehensive haulage network was modelled in the Deswik.LHS module using the in-pit haulage ramps designed for each phase, pioneering roads, and ex-pit access roads.

 

The Deswik.LHS module accounts for dynamic changes in haul path due to increased depth of mining within the pit as well as increased dump lift height, dump lateral extension, and haul truck specific performance parameters.

 

Fuel burn rates were estimated for each haulage route within the Deswik.LHS model using estimated rimpull and retard curve engine load factors. These were accumulated to determine an overall variable fuel consumption per haulage cycle.

 

The haulage travel times, fuel burn rates, and haulage distances for each haul truck were evaluated and reported according to the tactical schedule destination. Key haulage assumptions are presented in Table 16.18

 

Table 16.18 Haulage assumptions

 

  Unit Value
Ex-pit mining (ore and waste)
Queue at loader min 0.5
Spot at loader min 0.35
Load time min 2.6
Spot and dump min 0.85
Total min 4.3
Stockpile reclaim
Queue at loader min 0
Spot at loader min 0.35
Load time min 2.6
Spot and dump min 0.85
Total min 3.8
Max truck speed on ramp (loaded / unloaded) km/h 20 / 20
Max truck speed ex-pit (loaded / unloaded) km/h 40 / 40
Max truck speed on bench / on dump km/h 20 / 20
Max truck speed corners (loaded / unloaded) km/h 15 / 15
Rolling resistance % 2

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

16.9.3Mining sequence

 

Figure 16.20 shows the total material mined by phase. Figure 16.21 shows the mining sequence on 3-year intervals. End-of-period plans are presented in Figure 16.22 and Figure 16.23.

 

Table 16.19 summarizes the LOM production schedule by year and includes the process feed, stockpile balances, ex-pit material movements, drill and blast, and load and haul equipment operating hours.

 

amcconsultants.com239

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 16.20Total material mined by phase

 

 

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

Figure 16.21Mining sequence

 

 

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com240

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 16.22 End of period plans from Year -2 to Year 2

 

 

amcconsultants.com241

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 16.23 End of period plans from Year 5 to the end-of-mine.

 

 

amcconsultants.com242

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 16.19 LOM production schedule by year

 

  Units Year -2 Year -1 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14
Plant summary
Process feed
Feed tonnes Mt     3.73 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.29
Feed grade Ag g/t 147 144 135 101 100 98 93 107 92 81 85 110 78 43
Direct feed tonnes Mt 1.25 4.00 3.42 3.32 3.58 3.48 3.25 4.00 3.87 2.69 2.30 4.00 3.11 0.00
Stockpile reclaim tonnes Mt 2.48   0.58 0.68 0.42 0.52 0.75   0.13 1.31 1.70   0.89 0.29
Stockpile closing balance
HG stockpile Mt 1.23 1.73 0.69 0.58                        
Grade AG g/t 162 163 158 158                      
MG stockpile Mt 0.57 0.87 1.47 1.74 1.74 1.06 0.64 0.11              
Grade AG g/t 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74              
LG stockpile Mt 0.43 0.89 0.83 1.81 2.69 3.13 3.40 3.55 2.95 3.16 3.10 1.88 0.19 1.17 0.29
Grade AG g/t 48 47 46 46 46 45 45 45 45 44 44 44 43 43 43
Material movement Summary
Waste (ex-pit) Mt 9.15 15.11 13.16 9.69 10.04 10.75 13.54 13.38 14.19 13.81 13.64 15.24 13.96 11.33 4.89  
Ore (ex-pit) Mt 2.22 1.54 2.98 5.11 4.30 3.76 3.85 3.63 3.28 4.21 3.95 2.77 2.32 4.98 3.11  
Total mined (ex-pit) Mt 11.38 16.65 16.14 14.80 14.33 14.51 17.39 17.01 17.47 18.02 17.59 18.02 16.28 16.31 8.00  
Reclaimed ore Mt     2.48 0.00 0.58 0.68 0.42 0.52 0.75   0.13 1.31 1.70   0.89 0.29
Total mined & reclaimed Mt 11.38 16.65 18.62 14.80 14.91 15.19 17.81 17.53 18.21 18.02 17.71 19.33 17.98 16.31 8.89 0.29
Total movement (ex-pit) by pit
MP1 Mt 4.23       5.50            

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18.02

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16.28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16.31

   
MP2 Mt   6.52 2.92 2.28                
MP3 Mt   2.85 4.76 5.51 1.13              
MP4 Mt   5.46 2.21                  
MP5 Mt 6.45               2.56      
MP6 Mt   1.82 6.25 7.01 7.70 12.54 11.53 14.00 8.00 4.01 0.95  
MP7 Mt 0.70               3.89 8.00 8.63 6.56
MP8 Mt           1.98 5.85 3.00 3.01 6.01 8.01 1.44
Equipment summary
Trucks
XDR80T operating hours (ex-pit) hrs x1,000 99.7 192.3 177.1 154.3 158.3 166.6 194.1 209.0 199.1 206.2 199.0 220.7 198.4 178.5 81.6  
XDR80T average productivity (ex-pit) tph 114.2 86.6 91.1 95.9 90.5 87.1 89.6 81.4 87.7 87.4 88.4 81.6 82.0 91.4 98.0
XDR80T average cycle time (ex-pit) mins 37.1 48.7 46.3 44.0 46.6 48.4 47.1 51.8 48.1 48.3 47.7 51.7 51.4 46.2 43.0
XDR80T total trucks # 19 36 33 29 30 31 37 39 37 39 37 42 37 34 15
Excavators  
XE1250G operating hours hrs x1,000 13.7 20.1 19.4 17.8 17.3 17.5 20.9 20.5 21.0 21.7 21.2 21.7 19.6 19.7 9.6  
XE700D operating hours hrs x1,000 1.2 1.2 0.7 0.9 1.3 0.0 0.2 2.2 2.9 1.5
Drills  
Drill metres m x1,000 210.1 344.6 282.6 271.4 255.7 277.4 305.0 272.7 303.4 311.6 238.0 318.4 250.4 251.9 116.2  
Drill operating hours hrs x1,000 11.7 19.1 15.7 15.1 14.2 15.4 16.9 15.1 16.9 17.3 13.2 17.7 13.9 14.0 6.5
Waste dump summary
TSF embankment Mm3 3.54 7.73 6.74 4.96 5.14 5.50 6.93 6.85 7.26 7.07 6.98 7.80 1.74  

 

 

 2.50

 
WD1 Mm3     5.40 5.01
Valley dump Mm3   0.43    
Water dam Mm3 0.72      
Inpit dumps Mm3       0.79

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com243

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Some important milestones of the mining schedule are presented in Table 16.20.

 

Table 16.20 Schedule milestones

 

Date Milestones
Year -2

Mine haul road construction starts (MP1 / MP5 to Process Plant, Water Dam)

Mine haul road construction starts (Process Plant to TSF and WD1)

Road construction starts (to topsoil stockpile, magazines, camp / office)

Topsoil clearing under TSF, magazine, plant, camp, and other infrastructure

Topsoil clearing and pre-strip starts MP1, MP5, and MP7

Stockpile platform construction starts

Water dam construction starts

TSF embankment construction starts

Year -1

Mine haul road construction starts (MP2 / MP3 / MP4 to Valley dump, Water Dam)

Topsoil clearing and pre-strip starts MP2, MP3, MP4, and MP6

Topsoil clearing under the Valley dump

Valley dump construction starts

Year 1 Plant production commences with a ramp-up period
Year 2 Plant feed at full capacity
MP2 mining complete
Year 3 MP1 and MP3 mining complete
Year 4 Topsoil clearing and mining starts MP8
Year 7 MP5 mining complete
Year 9 MP6 mining complete
Year 10 Topsoil clearing under WD1
WD1 dump construction starts
Year 11 TSF embankment construction complete
Year 12 In-pit dumping starts
Year 13 End of mining operations. Rehabilitation commenced
Year 14 Final ore from the low-grade stockpiles is processed
Year 18 Rehabilitation completed

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

The main outcomes of the tactical schedule are presented below:

 

·Mining operations will take 15 years, including the pre-production period.
·Processing will last 14 years, the last year of which will be stockpile re-handle only (partial year).
·Total annual ex-pit material movement peaks at approximately 18 Mtpa.
·Ex-pit tonnes average 40 ktpd over the LOM.
·The silver production profile follows the strategic schedule with at least 15 Moz for the first three years of mill production.
·In-pit dumping starts in year 12.
·A maximum long-term stockpile capacity of 4.40 Mt is required as seen in Figure 16.25. The majority of this stockpile is made up of the lowest grade material, which is being stored for plant feed at the end of the mine life. It has been assumed that there will be no detrimental effect to the metallurgical recovery of the stockpiled ore.

 

amcconsultants.com244

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

16.9.4Plant feed schedule

 

Figure 16.24 shows the plant feed tonnes and grades.

 

Figure 16.24 Tactical schedule plant feed

 

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

16.9.5Stockpile size

 

The inventory of the stockpiles over the mine life is presented in Figure 16.25.

 

amcconsultants.com245

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 16.25 Tactical schedule stockpile inventory

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

16.10Equipment and personnel requirements

 

It is assumed that the management and technical staff will be part of the owner’s team. Contractor personnel numbers were estimated for mine supervision, mine operations, and mobile equipment maintenance.

 

All staff are planned to work the same shift roster. Features of this roster are:

 

·14 days on shift and seven days off shift, per shift cycle
·12 hours per shift
·20 days per year of vacation leave
·Five days of absenteeism /sick / special leave per year
·Five days of training / professional development per year.

 

Allowances have been made to the number of staff to ensure that shift coverage will be available for mine supervision, operations, and mobile equipment maintenance personnel on leave. Allowances have not been made for coverage of management and technical staff positions. It was assumed that other personnel from the owner’s team could provide coverage, or additional support could be sourced from contractors and consultants.

 

amcconsultants.com246

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Management and technical roles are staffed for a single day shift only. Limiting these roles to a single shift will cause gaps in staffing that may be partially alleviated by staggering when each person starts their shift. Operations, maintenance, and support personnel will be staffed day and night, for two shifts per day. Since personnel are scheduled for 14 days on and seven days off, the starting day of each shift will be staggered by seven days to ensure that staff are scheduled year-round for day and night shifts.

 

The above roster and mining schedules were used to derive peak equipment requirements. The open pit equipment requirement at peak production is summarized in Figure 16.26.

 

Figure 16.26 Open pit equipment requirements at peak production

 

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

Note: 1Equipment models indicated are for sizing and costing purposes only and are not meant to be recommendations regarding equipment manufacturers for purchasing decisions.

 

Total operator numbers required were calculated for the number of machines on-site at any given time, taking into account rosters, sick, and vacation leave. Production equipment such as haul trucks, loading units, drills, and dozers were considered to be staffed at all times.

 

The number of personnel required for mobile equipment maintenance was determined using maintenance labour ratios and the quantity of each type of equipment required by the period in the tactical schedule. The maintenance labour ratios were estimated from the QP’s field experience and are based on the number of hours of maintenance to the number of hours of operation. Ratios varied depending on the type of equipment.

 

Mining production and maintenance positions are expected to be filled by the local workforce. It was assumed that the local workforce would be accommodated in nearby towns and villages.

 

amcconsultants.com247

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Management staff, technical staff, and expatriates will be accommodated in the camp built at the mine site.

 

The yearly requirement for the open pit workforce peaks at 283 people in Year 10 and is presented for the LOM in Figure 16.27.

 

Figure 16.27 Open-pit workforce requirements

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com248

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

17Recovery methods

 

17.1Summary

 

The results from recent metallurgical testwork programs (described in Section 13) have been used as a basis for confirming the selected mineral processing flowsheet for the Silver Sand project. Interpretation of the testwork data has enabled the preparation of a preliminary process design criteria, mass and metal balances, equipment selections and a flowsheet.

 

Several processing options have been considered by the metallurgical team, including heap leaching, froth flotation and agitated tank cyanidation (with and without activated carbon). The findings of preliminary trade-off studies that compared the capital cost, operating cost and metallurgical efficiency of these different options have been verified by the most recent metallurgical work, and an agitated tank cyanidation process has been selected for the PFS.

 

The selected flowsheet represents a commonly practiced, low-risk approach to silver extraction, and consists of the following unit operations:

 

·ROM receiving, crushing and crushed rock stockpiling.
·Stockpile draw-down, followed by grinding using a conventional SAG mill and ball mill configuration.
·SAG mill pebble crushing, utilizing SAG mill pebble ports, a scalping screen, recycle conveyors and a cone crusher.
·Pre-leach thickening of the milled slurry, followed by cyanide leaching using agitated, oxygen and air sparged tanks.
·Liquid / solid separation using counter-current decantation (thickeners).
·Recovery of silver from pregnant leach solution using a zinc precipitation process followed by drying and smelting of the silver precipitates with a mixture of fluxes to produce silver doré bars.
·Filtration of leach residues.
·Conveying of tailing filter cake and long-term storage at the tailing storage area.

The processing rate was selected to match the mine production rate of 12,000 tpd or 4,000,000 tpa. Simplified flow diagrams for the full processing plant are given in Figure 17.1 and Figure 17.2.

 

amcconsultants.com249

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 17.1 Leaching-CCD PFSD 1

 

 

 

amcconsultants.com250

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 17.2 Leaching-CCD PFSD

 

 

amcconsultants.com251

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

17.2Process design criteria

 

The Process Design Criteria (PDC) developed as a basis for flowsheet design and costing in the PFS is summarized in Table 17.1 below.

 

Table 17.1 Process design criteria

 

Criteria Unit Design
Mean Annual Throughput dmtpa 4,000,000
Crushing Circuit Availability % 75
  Operating hours per annum h 6,570
  Hourly feed rate dmtpoh 667
Grinding Circuit Availability % 91.3
  Operating Hours per annum h 8,000
  hourly feed rate dmtpoh 500
ROM Characteristics Solids Specific Gravity t/m3 2.56
(average blend) Crushing Work Index kW.h/t 10.3
  Abrasion Index g 0.28
  Axb - 45.2
  Rod Mill Work Index kW.h/t 7.5
  Bond Ball Work Index kW.h/t 14.8
  Silver grade (average) g/t 113
  Copper grade g/t 319
Crushing Circuit Feed top size mm 700
  Feed size, F80 mm 450
  Product size, P80 mm 125
  Peak hourly throughput dmtpoh 670
Grinding Circuit Feed top size mm 220
  Configuration   SABC
  SAG mill feed size, F80 mm 125
  Cyclone overflow size, P80 µm 75
  Applied energy kWh/t 23.8
  Hourly Throughput dmtpoh 500
Pre-Leach Thickener Diameter m 30
  Unit area t/m2/d 15.5
  Underflow % solids % 48
Leaching Circuit Retention time h 72
  No of tanks   15
  Each tank volume m3 3,925
  pH range   10.5 – 11.0
  NaCN concentration g/L 2.0
  Pulp density % solid 45
  DO2 levels ppm 12-15
  Silver dissolution rate % 91.0

 

amcconsultants.com252

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Criteria Unit Design
CCD No of stages   4
  Thickener diameter m 35x1, 30x3
  Unit area t/m2/d 11.4, 15.5
  Wash water / solids ratio w/w 3.0
  Underflow %solids % 50-55
  Wash efficiency % 99.5
Merrill Crowe Clarifying Filters # 5 (4+1)
  Filtration area of each filter m2 188
  Zinc addition rate kg Zn/kg Ag 1.5
  Lead nitrate kg Pb(NO3)2/kg Ag 0.6
  Precipitation Filters # 6 (5+1)
  Precipitation cycle time days 1
Refinery

Precipitate cake handling

Moisture content of filter cake

t/d

%

10 (wet)

30

  Drying ovens # 3
  Induction furnace kW 800
  Overall Silver Recovery into doré % 91.0
Tailings      
  Tail filter feed slurry density t/m3 1.51
  % Solids % (w/w) 55
  Tailings filter capacity dmtph 500
  Number of filters # 7
  Total filtration area m2 5,600

 

17.3Process description

 

The 4 Mtpa processing plant is described in the following subsections and illustrated in Figure 17.3 to Figure 17.13.

 

17.3.1Crushing circuit

 

ROM ore will be delivered to the plant area in 70-tonne trucks and dumped via an earth ramp into an inload bin. The maximum particle size accepted into the plant will be 700 mm. The inload bin will be discharged by a variable speed vibrating grizzly feeder (VGF) allowing both fines bypass and throughput control for the primary jaw crusher. Approximately 50% of the ore will report to the crusher, whilst the finer fractions will pass through the VGF onto the conveyor beneath, bypassing the crusher.

 

The jaw crusher, a 1200 mm x 1400 mm unit, will crush VGF oversize material with discharge falling onto a short sacrificial conveyor together with VGF fines. The sacrificial conveyor will transfer primary crushed ore onto the stockpile feed conveyor via a lined chute that will also present the material to a magnet that can remove tramp steel that might be present from time to time. The stockpile feed conveyor will transport the crushed ore from the crushing station to the top of an uncovered conical stockpile that will provide a 16-hour throughput buffer at nominal rates.

 

Dust extraction and/or suppression units will assist with the control of fugitive dust emissions around transfer points and will return captured fine material back to process via internal recirculation.

 

The crushing circuit design is based on an average 669 dmtph throughput rate, with an assumed operational availability of 75%.

 

amcconsultants.com253

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

17.3.2Grinding circuit

 

The crushed ore stockpile will be drawn down using three variable speed vibratory feeders (two running, one on standby). The feeders control the rate at which the stockpile will be drawn onto the SAG Mill feed conveyor. A weightometer located on the SAG mill feed conveyor will measure and accumulate tonnage rates, allowing for accurate process control and metallurgical accounting.

 

Lime will be added to the SAG mill feed conveyor in powdered form to bring the pre-leach thickener feed slurry pH up to 9.5 - 9.8. The balance of lime (required to raise pH to 10.5) will be added as a slurry directly to the first 2 leach tanks.

 

An 8.5 m diameter x 4.0 m EGL, SAG mill with 5,500 kW single pinion drive will be fed with primary crushed ore via the SAG mill feed conveyor, whereupon it will be mixed with cyanide-bearing process water and ground to a coarse pulp using 5” steel balls and other large rocks already part of the mill charge. The SAG mill will be equipped with a VFD for speed control. As the slurry / pebble mixture is drawn from the SAG mill via internal pan lifters and a discharge grate, it will pass over a vibrating screen fitted with 15 mm aperture panels. This screen will protect the slurry pumps from oversize material, directing it instead into the pebble crushing circuit. The screen undersize stream, a coarsely ground slurry of roughly 55% solids content by weight, will gravitate into the common mill discharge pumpbox where it will combine with ball mill discharge slurry.

 

Scalping screen oversize material, consisting mainly of pebbles, will discharge onto a recycle conveyor system equipped with self-cleaning magnets and a metal detector. The pebble stream will discharge into a storage bin sized to provide a 15 to 20-minute capacity buffer. This storage bin will be discharged using a vibrating pan feeder into the pebble crusher before being conveyed back to the SAG mill as a recycle stream. The pebble crusher will reduce 50-60mm pebbles to 80% passing 10 mm.

 

Back at the SAG mill, discharge screen undersize slurry will combine with ball mill discharge slurry and process water in the common mill discharge pumpbox. From here, the slurry mixture will be pumped to a hydrocyclone cluster for classification. The cyclone underflow slurry (containing the coarse size fractions) will gravitate to the ball mill for additional grinding, while the cyclone overflow slurry (containing the finer size fractions) will gravitate to the pre-leaching thickener. Because of the presence of cyanide in the process water, a significant amount of silver is expected to dissolve during grinding.

 

The ball mill will be a 6.2 m diameter x 10.8 m EGL rubber lined overflow discharge unit with a 7,500 kW drive arrangement. A trommel screen on the mill discharge will protect pumps and help to remove tramp steel and other coarse material that may exit via the mill overflow.

 

Grinding balls (125 mm diameter for the SAG mill and 40 mm diameter for the ball mill) will be added to the SAG and ball mills on a regular basis in 2-tonne lots using a system of electric hoists, magnets and ball loading kibbles.

 

Slurry spilled within the grinding area will be directed into floor sumps, where vertical sump pumps will pump the collected spillage slurry back into the process.

 

The grinding circuit product (cyclone overflow) will have a size specification of 80% passing 75 µm.

 

The grinding area structural steelwork will be designed from day one to accommodate a future gravity concentration circuit (including concentrate regrinding) as this option has shown promise in the recent testwork to increase silver recovery. The gravity concentration circuit is not included in base-case PFS designs but is viewed as an obvious opportunity for further process improvement (via higher recovery, faster leach kinetics or reduced cyanide consumption).

 

amcconsultants.com254

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

17.3.3Cyanide leaching circuit

 

Cyclone overflow slurry at 33% solids will gravitate from the grinding area to the pre-leach thickener area via a two-stage sampling station that will automatically collect shift samples for metallurgical accounting purposes. Slurry bypassing the sampler will be directed onto a pair of trash screens before entering the pre-leach thickener feed launder. A dilute flocculant solution will be mixed into the thickener feed slurry to accelerate settling rates and to improve thickener overflow clarity.

 

As the finely ground solids settle within the pre-leach thickener, rotating rakes within the thickener will direct material to the centre cone, and into the suction side of the thickener underflow pumps. The thickener underflow pumps will pump thickened slurry from the thickener into the leaching tanks.

 

The leaching circuit will consist of 15 agitated tanks in series. Each tank will contain roughly 4,000 m3 of slurry and will be equipped with a 200kW twin blade agitator. Tanks will be cascaded, to allow gravity flow through the circuit. Lime slurry will be added to the first 2 or 3 leach tanks to ensure that pH is maintained above 10.5 during the cyanidation process. A cyanide dosing system will be provided to allow controlled addition to any tank. 72 hours of retention time will be provided by the leaching tanks, assuming a slurry density of 1.42 t/m3 (i.e. 48 weight % solids). Higher densities may be achievable in practice, and this would increase retention time (and possibly silver extraction rate) accordingly. Oxygen availability is a particularly important aspect of the silver leaching process, and testwork has already demonstrated how initial dissolved oxygen levels of >10 ppm are very beneficial to both silver extraction kinetics and cyanide consumption. To aid the efficient transfer of oxygen into the circuit, an on-site oxygen plant and high-velocity gas injection spargers will be included in the leach tank design.

 

Slurry overflow from leach tank #15 will gravitate into the feed mixing box of counter current decantation (CCD) thickener #1. A train of 4 CCD thickeners operating with a wash ratio of 3:1 will provide the necessary solids / liquid separation after the leaching process to achieve a wash efficiency of greater than 99%. Each CCD thickener will be equipped with flocculant dosing and mixing facilities, to accelerate solids settling rates and to improve overflow clarity.

 

The CCD circuit will employ counter-current washing of leached solids with barren solution to reduce residue solution silver losses to minimum practical levels. The thickened underflow slurry from each CCD thickener will be pumped downstream (i.e. thickener #1 underflow is pumped to thickener #2 feed), whilst the overflow solution from each thickener will gravitate from thickener #4 to #3 to #2 to #1. Efficient mixing of the upstream slurry and downstream solution prior to entering the thickener is an important aspect of the design, and this will be effected through the use of static mixing boxes directly ahead of each CCD thickener.

 

The overflow solution from CCD thickener #1 will be the pregnant leach solution (PLS) and it is expected that this will contain about 99.5% of the silver dissolved during leaching. Mass and solution balance calculations for the overall flowsheet indicate a PLS flowrate of approximately 1,850 m3/h.

 

17.3.4Zinc precipitation and silver dore production

 

The PLS from CCD thickener #1 will be pumped into a surge / storage tank ahead of the zinc cementation circuit. The 1,600 m3 tank will provide close to 1-hour of surge capacity in case the zinc cementation (Merrill Crowe) plant is shut down temporarily.

 

From the PLS storage tank, pregnant solution will be pumped to the zinc precipitation circuit. This plant area will follow the standard Merrill Crowe flowsheet, with PLS solution clarification, vacuum deaeration, zinc dust and lead nitrate addition, silver precipitate filtration, and precipitate handling. Two stages of solution clarification have been allowed for, with a large sand filter providing

 

amcconsultants.com255

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

additional solids removal capacity under non-ideal conditions. Thereafter, a set of five automatic leaf filters (4 operating, one on standby) will further reduce solids content to no more than 1 ppm. An automatic precoat system will be employed to assist the capture of ultrafine solid particles whilst maintaining reasonable media permeability. Diatomaceous Earth is used as the precoat medium and is added as a slurry at the commencement of a clarification cycle (pre-coat) and during the cycle (body feed).

 

Silver precipitate filter cake will be removed from the precipitate filter presses at a rate of roughly 2 tonnes (wet) per press every 2-day cycle, with an assumed 75% silver+copper grade and a 30% cake moisture content. As the precipitate is expected to contain significant quantities of copper in some cases, the flowsheet makes allowance for an oxidative sulphuric acid leaching stage, which will preferentially leach copper into solution without mobilizing silver. This is standard operating practice when copper levels become problematic for precious metal doré production. The sulphuric acid leaching area will be very well ventilated due to the risk of HCN generation. Likewise, the acid solution storage/reticulation will be closely monitored and strictly contained within a small area of the refinery. A small amount of silver may dissolve in sulphuric acid solution under the oxidizing conditions. When this happens, the dissolved silver will be precipitated with the addition of sodium chloride.

 

As copper levels in the sulphuric leach solutions reach a threshold level, then a solution bleed will become necessary. Allowance has been made for the bleed stream to be neutralized and pumped to tailings as required (The precipitated copper will dissolve instantaneously upon contacting with cyanide in the tailing slurry. Therefore, it is better to filter it separately and then dispose it separately in an isolated area at the TSF).

 

Sulphuric leach residues will be silver rich, and these will be filtered and dried in ovens prior to transportation to the doré smelting area. Dry residue material will be mixed with fluxes in a flux mixing area, and then added to one of three induction furnaces for smelting. Once smelting is completed, slag is skimmed from the melt surface and the molten doré metal is poured into pre-heated moulds. The resultant doré bars will be cleaned and stored within the refinery vault.

 

As the Merrill Crowe process is expected to be ~99% efficient, filtrate from the silver precipitation pressure filter will contain only traces of silver although it will still contain significant cyanide levels. The filtrate, known as “barren solution”, will be directed to a 1,600 m3 surge tank – sized to give almost 1 hour of surge capacity. From the surge tank, pumps will distribute barren solution back into the grinding, leaching and CCD process areas to ensure efficient recycling of cyanide whilst also retaining any residual dissolved silver.

 

17.3.5Tailing treatment

 

As a result of the relatively high cyanide concentrations required for effective silver dissolution, the solution within CCD residue slurry will still contain a significant amount of free cyanide. Effective dewatering of the residue prior to disposal on the tailing storage facility is therefore important, for environmental and economic reasons.

 

The residue slurry is pumped at roughly 60% solids (by weight) from the CCD area to the tailing filtration area for thorough dewatering before disposal. An agitated tailing filter feed tank provides over 1-hour of surge capacity between the CCD circuit and the pressure filtration plant.

 

Slurry from the filter feed tank will be pumped to one of seven tailings pressure filters for further dewatering. Each tailing filter will use high pressure feed pumping, followed by membrane squeezing and air blowing to drive remaining moisture levels down to give a filter cake product that achieves transportable moisture targets (less than 15% moisture). Each filter will discharge automatically using plate shifters to allow a rapid cycle time and high throughput rates.

 

amcconsultants.com256

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Cake from each press will gravitate via platework onto a dedicated discharge conveyor belt which in turn feeds onto the overland tailing conveyor.

 

The overland tailing conveyor will transfer cake from the process area to the tailing storage area. The overland conveyor will discharge onto a radial stacking conveyor which will deposit cake in a large semi-circular pile near the edge of the storage facility. The radial stacking arrangement will operate on a highly compacted pad area and will allow for safe cake removal and distribution using bulldozers.

 

Filtrate recovered from residue slurry by the tailing pressure filters will be directed to a filtrate holding tank and then pumped back to the process water tank where it will be re-used within the process area.

 

The filter cake will be washed using cyanide-free make-up water to achieve 50% wash efficiency in order to improve recovery of cyanide.

 

17.3.6Reagents

 

Reagents will be delivered to site by road, and suitable offloading, storage, mixing and dosing facilities will be provided within the process area. Addition of the following chemicals is anticipated:

 

·Hydrated lime
·Sodium cyanide
·Caustic soda (NaOH)
·Lead nitrate
·Flocculant
·Sulphuric acid
·Hydrogen peroxide
·Antiscalent
·Zinc powder
·Fluxes

 

Where practical, dry reagents (flocculant, lead nitrate, zinc powder etc.) will be offloaded and stored within the dedicated reagents storage area. Lime will be offloaded into and stored in a lime silo adjacent to the plant. Lime slaking, slurry storage and distribution will be located inside the building, within the reagents area.

 

A ventilated storage and mixing area will be provided for sodium cyanide and this will be kept apart from other reagent areas. Fixed HCN (hydrogen cyanide) gas detectors will be located within the building at strategic points, and personnel will wear appropriate personal protective equipment and portable HCN monitors.

 

Flocculant will be mixed in packaged mixing/dosing systems that will include mixing / hydration tanks and storage tanks.

 

Acid, caustic soda, hydrogen peroxide and antiscalent will be delivered in 1,000 litre FIBC containers and the reagents will be dosed directly from these as required using reagent dosing pumps.

 

17.3.7Services & water

 

Raw water will be pumped to site (by others) and stored within several storage tanks and earth impoundments, to ensure that sufficient water will always be available for processing.

 

amcconsultants.com257

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Raw water and process water pumps will distribute water as required throughout the process plant. Process water is recovered from the tailing thickener and recycled within the plant.

 

A significant volume of pregnant and barren solutions will also add to the volume of water stored and recycled within the process plant.

 

Instrument grade compressed air will be distributed throughput the plant for actuation of control valves and operation of other instruments.

 

Oxygen will be generated using vacuum pressure swing technology and piped to spargers on leach tanks at roughly 600 kPa. The spargers allow rapid oxygenation of slurry within the early stages of leaching.

 

17.4Process plant flowsheets

 

The process plant is illustrated via a series of Process Flow Diagrams (PFD’s) in Figure 17.3 to Figure 17.12 on the following pages.

 

17.5Process plant layout drawings

 

The process plant is further described by layout drawings, shown in Figure 17.13.

 

These drawings form the basis for the estimation of material quantities used in the capital cost estimate (discussed in Section 21).

 

amcconsultants.com258

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 17.3 Process flowsheet: Comminution

 

 

amcconsultants.com259

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 17.4 Process flowsheet: Leaching

 

 

amcconsultants.com260

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 17.5Process flowsheet: Counter current decantation

 

 

amcconsultants.com261

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 17.6Process flowsheet: Merrill Crowe (1)

   

amcconsultants.com262

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 17.7Process flowsheet: Merrill Crowe (2)

 

 

amcconsultants.com263

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 17.8Process flowsheet: Tailings dewatering

 

 

amcconsultants.com264

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 17.9Process flowsheet: Refinery

 

 

amcconsultants.com265

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 17.10 Process flowsheet: Services (Gas)

 

 

amcconsultants.com266

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 17.11 Process flowsheet: Reagents

 

 

amcconsultants.com267

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 17.12 Process flowsheet: Services (Water)

 

 

amcconsultants.com268

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 17.13 Site plan: Process plant area

 

 

amcconsultants.com269

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

17.6Major equipment lists

 

The following table lists the major equipment items by process area, together with installed power ratings (where applicable).

 

Table 17.2Equipment list summary

 

Plant area No. off Equipment description Installed power, kW
Unit Total

 

 

 

Crushing

1 Vibrating Grizzly Feeder 30 30
1 Primary Jaw Crusher 200 200
1 Dust Extraction Systems 11 11
1 Sacrificial Conveyor 30 30
1 Magnets/Metal Detectors 5 5
1 Stockpile Feed Conveyor 75 75

 

Ore Storage

3 SAG Mill Stockpile feeders 30 90
1 Dust Extraction Systems 7.5 7.5
1 SAG Mill Feed Conveyor 45 45

 

 

 

 

 

Grinding

1 SAG Mill 5500 5,500
1 Ball Mill 7500 7,500
1 Scalping Screen 55 55
2 Cyclone Feed Pumps 600 1,200
1 Cyclone Pack - -
1 Cyclone Overflow Sampler 11 11
2 Grinding Area Sump Pumps (2 off) 22 44
1 Misc. minor Items 100 100

 

Pebble Crushing

3 Pebble Crusher Conveyors 15 45
1 Magnets/Metal Detectors 7.5 7.5
1 Feeder 7.5 7.5
1 Pebble Crusher 132 132

 

 

 

 

Leaching & CCD

1 Pre-Leach Thickener 15 15
2 Pre-Leach Thickener U/F Pump 250 500
15 Leaching Tanks, 4,000m3 - -
15 Leaching Tank Agitator 175 2,625
2 Samplers 5.5 11
4 CCD Thickener 15 60
8 CCD Thickener U/F Pumps 125 1000
2 CCD Area Sump Pump 15 30

 

 

 

 

 

Tailings

5 Tailings Filter Press 300 1,500
5 Cake discharge Feeder 11 55
1 Filtrate Tank - -
2 Filtrate Pumps 55 110
1 Tailings Filter Press Feed Tank - -
1 Filter Press Feed Tank Agitator 55 110
2 Tailings Filter O/Land Conveyors 70 140
3 Tailings Filter Press Feed Pump 110 330
1 Misc. minor Items 40 40

 

amcconsultants.com270

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Plant area No. off Equipment description Installed power, kW
Unit Total

 

 

 

 

Merrill
Crowe +
Smelting

1 Pregnant Solution Tank - -
2 Pregnant Solution Pump 150 300
5 Merrill Crowe: Leaf Filters 75 150
1 Merrill Crowe: Crowe Tower 55 55
4 Merrill Crowe: Zinc Precipitation 30 60
1 Precoat/Body Coat System 30 30
1 Merrill Crowe Smelting/Refining Package 1250 1,250
1 Acid leaching and filtration package 55 55
1 Misc. minor Items 40 40

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reagents

1 Cyanide Mixing & Dosing System 50 50
1 Lime Vendor Package 120 120
2 Lime Dosing Pump 45 90
1 NaOH mixing & dosing package 22 22
1 Surfactant mixing & dosing package 10 10
1 Flocculant mixing & dosing package 30 30
1 Lead Nitrate mixing/dosing package 22 22
1 Oxygen Plant Package 600 600
2 Reagent Storage area ventilation fans 15 30
1 Misc. minor Items 40 40

 

 

 

 

Services

1 Process Water Tank - -
2 Process Water Pump 250 500
2 Gland Water Pump 30 60
2 Fresh Water Pump 90 180
1 Fire Water System 15 15
1 Misc. minor Items 40 40
2 Compressors 300 600

 

The process plant equipment includes an installed power rating of approximately 24.5MW. Initial estimates of power consumption for this process plant under normal operating conditions gives an applied power of 36.4 kWh/t.

 

17.7Process control philosophy

 

A control philosophy will be implemented for the Project that is typical of those used in similar modern processing operations.

 

Field instruments will provide analog and digital inputs to a group of Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs) or a Distributed Control System (DCS). Process control cubicles will be located within the local Motor Control Centres (MCCs) and will contain the system hardware, power supplies and I/O cards for instrument monitoring and loop control.

 

The PLC/DCS infrastructure will assist the plant operators with process control functions by providing the following services:

 

·Communicating the status information of all drives, instruments, and vendor packages.
·Allowing remote drive control (stop / start) and required process interlocking.
·Providing PID (proportional-integral-derivative) control for various control loops.

 

amcconsultants.com271

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The main Human-Machine Interface (HMI) will be in a Main Control Room (MCR) and a Crusher Control Room (CCR), consisting of PC-based terminals with industrial keyboards and mice. The Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system architecture will be configured to provide outputs to alarms, control the function of process equipment, and provide logging and trending facilities to assist in analysis of plant operations.

 

The control rooms will be purpose-built structures. Much of the plant will be controlled from the MCR, to be located adjacent to the grinding area. Operator control stations are fully redundant so that the failure of one station does not affect the operability of the other station or control of the plant. Control stations are supplied from an Uninterruptible Power Supply unit (UPS) with at least 30 minutes standby capability.

 

Drives that form part of a vendor package will be controlled from the vendor’s control panel. As a minimum requirement, ‘Run’ and ‘Fault’ signals from each vendor control panel are made available to the SCADA system via the PLC.

 

The general control strategy adopted for the Project will be as follows:

 

·Integrated control via the Process Control System (PCS) for areas where equipment requires sequencing and process interlocking.
·Hard-wired interlocks for personnel safety.
·Motor controls for starting and stopping of drives at local control stations via the PCS or hard-wired, depending on the drive classification. All drives can always be stopped from the local control station. Local and remote starting is dependent on the drive class and control mode.
·Control loops via the PCS except where exceptional circumstances apply.
·Monitoring of all relevant operating conditions on the PCS and recording selected information for data logging or trending.

 

Trip and alarm inputs to the PCS will be failsafe in operation, i.e., the signal reverts to the de-energized state when a fault occurs.

 

amcconsultants.com272

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

18Project infrastructure

 

18.1Overview

 

As a comprehensive greenfield project, the Silver Sand project will require the development of supporting infrastructure. This would include the following items:

 

·A process plant that will include crushing, conveying, grinding, leaching, counter current decantation (CCD), leach residue dewatering and disposal, zinc precipitation (Merrill Crowe), and doré smelting.
·An assay lab in close proximity to the process plant.
·A fuel farm.
·A warehouse and truck shop.
·Administration offices and supporting infrastructure.
·Filtered TSF and structural earth dams, initial waste rock piles.
·A network of access and on-site roads.
·Fresh water reservoir.
·A fresh water supply and distribution system.
·Power supply and distribution, including a power transmission line, a substation at the plant site, and power distribution lines throughout the site.
·Owners mine camp.
·Contractor’s camp and facilities.

 

Tentative locations have been identified for the above facilities. The final location of these facilities is dependant on further exploration drilling program to ensure there is no sterilization of Mineral Resources as well as accessibility. All facilities will be located close to the plant site in an elevated and dry area.

 

18.2Site location

 

Figure 18.1 shows the location of the Property in relation to city of Potosí and principal supporting infrastructure. As there is no rail access to the mine / concentrator site, delivery of all supplies and services, and reagents to the site will be by truck.

 

amcconsultants.com273

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 18.1 Silver Sand site location

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2022.

 

Figure 18.2 shows the proposed site layout with the ultimate pit, waste dumps, process plant, filtered TSF, ore stockpiles, crusher, site access road, water reservoir, truckshop, accommodations, explosives magazine and haul roads.

 

amcconsultants.com274

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 18.2Preliminary site infrastructure layout

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com275

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

18.3Road access

 

The Property is situated in the Colavi District of Potosí Department in southwestern Bolivia, 25 km north-east of Potosí city, the department capital. The current access road is shown in the above figure.

 

The Property is accessible from Potosí via a 54 km long road made up of a 27 km stretch of the paved Bolivia National Highway 5 and an all-season gravel road built for mining in the Colavi District. The gravel road is currently being widened and upgraded to paved road by the government.

 

Plant roads will be constructed in and around the process plant area to provide access to buildings and equipment for deliveries, operation, and maintenance access. These roads will be two-way unsealed roadways nominally 10 m wide to accommodate highway trucks and other site equipment as required.

 

18.4Power

 

The Silver Sand project is estimated to require approximately 25 MW of power annually.

 

New Pacific has engaged with Bolivia’s national power supply companies CNDC and ENDE. A preliminary power supply plan for the Silver Sand future operations has been discussed and agreed upon. The Company has submitted a power supply application to the Bolivia Ministry of Energy following the formal procedure in the country. The Ministry of Energy has issued an official letter to the Company acknowledging the application.

 

A transmission line connects to the Potosí existing ENDE substation, and a substation on the Silver Sand site needs to be constructed. CNDC and ENDE have provided a quotation to Silver Sand project to construct a 55 km powerline from Potosí to the project site. When the Company commits to building the power supply infrastructure, ENDE will be responsible for permitting and constructing the transmission line and the substation at the Silver Sand site. It is estimated that the permitting and construction of the transmission line and the substation will take up to two years.

 

Figure 18.2 which is the site plan shows the alignment of the proposed powerline to the Silver Sand property.

 

Bolivia is a country with an abundant quantity of energy. There are many suppliers of power. National grid power supply for the Silver Sand project has been determined to be the most suitable choice for the project. However, the company is also very active in pursuing green mine concept and is studying the use of solar and windmill energies.

 

The main substation at site will consist of disconnect switches, circuit breakers, protection equipment, utility-tie transformers, power factor correction capacitors, and medium voltage switchgear. The calculated total running load of the facility is approximately 25 MVA. Two 115/6.6 kV transformers will be installed, with the load being distributed evenly to each in normal operation. Each transformer will be sized such that in the event of a failure of one transformer, the remaining one can provide the total required plant load capacity. Two 2,500 kW diesel generators will be installed at the main substation to provide critical backup in the event of a utility outage.

 

Three 6.6 kV feeders will be run from the substation to the process plant – main feeder 1, main feeder 2, and an emergency feeder. In normal operation, the two main feeders will be utilized. The emergency feeder will be energized in the event of a failure of one of the two main feeders. Additional overhead line feeder circuits will be run to the camp and workshop areas of the facility, as well as the explosives magazine.

 

amcconsultants.com276

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

18.5Supply water

 

Water has not been a concern at the Property. Water for domestic use can be sourced from a small lake, approximately 3.5 km north-west of the Property. Water for drilling can be sourced from nearby drainages.

 

A hydrological and hydrogeological conceptual study was completed by Itasca Chile in October 2022. 3 piezometers were also installed in the main open pit area to monitor the groundwater flow.

 

A water dam will be built upstream from the mine (Figure 18.3) in the narrowest part of the creek to hold the water in a reservoir with a capacity of about 3.0 million cubic metres. A cross-section through the dam is shown in Figure 18.4.

 

The water dam will be constructed as a rockfill embankment with an upstream Bituminous Geomembrane Liner system. Run-of-mine rockfill will be used to construct the majority of the embankment. Upstream zones of select run-of-mine rock, transition and bedding will be constructed below the liner system, to provide a smooth surface for construction of the liner. The liner will be anchored and sealed to bedrock at the upstream toe of the dam, to provide a cutoff and reduce potential seepage losses from the reservoir. An emergency overflow spillway will be excavated through rock on the north abutment to pass runoff from extreme storm events once the reservoir has reached the full supply level.

 

Figure 18.3 Water dam overview

 

 

Source: NewFields Canada Mining & Environment ULC, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com277

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 18.4 Water dam cross section

 

Source: NewFields Canada Mining & Environment ULC, 2024.

 

This will provide water for the mineral processing plant and mining camp and could supply downstream residents for farming and daily life water needs if required. It is expected that the water dam will reach full supply level within about four years of start of filling, under average precipitation conditions, while also providing make-up water to the process plant.

 

The average make-up water requirement for the process plant is estimated at about 2,200 m3 per day, that is equivalent to the maximum water usage per year of the project estimated at 0.8 million m3. This is below the capacity of the reservoir of 3.0 million m3. However, Silver Sand project area has about eight months of dry season every year.

 

Most of the processing water will be recycled and reused, except the moisture trapped in the dry tailings that either remains locked within voids or evaporates. No processing water will be discharged without treatment.

 

18.6Fuel storage

 

A small fuel storage facility with a capacity for one week of operations or approximately 400,000 litres has been allowed for. This will be needed to supply fuels to the onsite light vehicles and mill maintenance equipment. Mining will be contracted to third-party companies. They will build their own fuel storage facilities onsite. Initially the contractor will be providing its own fuel requirements.

 

amcconsultants.com278

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

18.7Offices and warehouse

 

Offices with a capacity of 35 employees has been designed and costed for the project and warehouses are planned to be built onsite, close to the processing plant.

 

18.8Equipment maintenance workshop

 

Heavy equipment maintenance workshop is planned to be built and used by the mining contractor. Silver Sand has also costed a 6-bay truck shop equipped with a 5-tonne travelling crane for the shop.

 

18.9Explosives magazine

 

Explosive and accessory depots will be built, with all the standards and specifications required by the government for the use and handling of explosives. The consumption is expected to be approximately 3,500 – 3,800 tonnes per year.

 

18.10Communications

 

The Silver Sand site has an excellent cell phone signal. Most mobile phones can receive 3G / LTE signal on site. However, a radio communication system is planned to be constructed for everyday operations communication.

 

18.11Gate house / security

 

Security gates and fences are planned to be built around the mine operations area.

 

18.12Accommodations

 

Most employees will be commuting from the nearby Potosí. However, a camp with capacity for 100 persons has been allowed for those who will be working at site and not residing in the area. Accommodations are envisaged to be built close to the processing plant.

 

18.13Filtered tailings storage facility

 

The filtered TSF will be integrated within the waste rock storage area. The TSF will be fully lined to provide protection against release of potentially contaminated water to the local surface and groundwater systems. A leachate collection system will be installed below the liner system to collect any seepage that may occur through small holes in the TSF liner system.

 

The TSF will be developed in a valley to the south of the mine and process plant as shown in Figure 18.2. A seepage and runoff collection pond will be developed downstream of the TSF. An initial starter berm of mine waste rock will be constructed on the south and east sides of the facility to provide structural support for the tailings and liner system. A starter TSF cell will be developed along the western perimeter of the waste rock storage facility, with sufficient capacity to store tailings from the first one year of operations. The general layout of the TSF and waste rock storage facility is shown in plan in Figure 18.5 and a section view of the waste dump and TSF is shown in Figure 18.6.

 

The TSF will be raised as required over the operating life of the facility. Suitable waste rock is expected to be place continuously as it becomes available from the mining operations. Compaction of the waste rock will be provided by the fully loaded mine haul trucks and dozers used for spreading the rockfill in thin layers.

 

As discussed, the TSF will be fully lined with a linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) liner system, which will be constructed over a prepared foundation of the base of the facility and will extend up the upstream slope of the perimeter waste rock containment berm. On the perimeter berm, zones

 

amcconsultants.com279

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

of processed transition and liner bedding material will be placed over the bulk rockfill, to provide a smooth surface on which to construct the liner. The transition and bedding materials will be compacted using a vibratory drum roller.

 

Figure 18.5 TSF Overview

 


Source: NewFields Canada Mining & Environment ULC, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com280

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 18.6TSF sectional view

 

 

Source: NewFields Canada Mining & Environment ULC, 2024.

 

Filtered tailings will be transported approximately 1,000 m from the process plant to the filtered TSF via an overland conveyor. The overland conveyor will discharge the tailings onto a radial stacking conveyor which will discharge the tailings onto a semi-circular pile within the lined facility. Tailings deposited onto the radial stacking conveyor stockpile will be removed, spread and nominally compacted using a bulldozer. As containment of the tailings will be provided through the placement of waste rock to the south and east of the TSF, safe operation of the TSF will only require sufficient compaction to provide a safe working surface for the mobile equipment.

 

As noted above, the perimeter containment berms for the TSF will be constructed of run-of-mine waste rock. Based on the chemical analysis completed, waste rock will be separated into three categories based on the total suphur content of the waste (<1% Sulphur, 1% to 2% Sulphur and >2% Sulphur). Approximately 3% of the total waste rock has a total sulphur content greater than 2%. This material will be disposed in the TSF and intermingled with the placed tailings, to limit oxygen exposure of this material. In general, waste rock with less than 1% Sulphur will be used for construction of the perimeter containment berms for the TSF.

 

As the tailings will be filtered, there will be no excess tailings transport water which will require management throughout operations. The main source of excess water will be runoff from precipitation events during the wet seasons at the site. Any tailings contact water from precipitation events will be collected in internal sumps or the Seepage Collection Pond at the downstream end of the facility and recirculated to the process plant for re-use in the milling process.

 

amcconsultants.com281

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

To reduce the volume of water that will contact the placed tailings and waste rock during precipitation events, a series of diversion ditches will be excavated around the perimeter of the TSF. The diversion ditches will direct non-contact runoff around the TSF to natural drainage courses downstream of the facility. Contact run-off will be collected in a seepage and runoff collection pond which will be constructed at the south end of the facility. Water collected within the pond, will be pumped back to the process plant for use as process water. It is anticipated that the seepage and runoff collection pond will be dry for at least four months of the year.

 

A site wide water balance was developed for the project. Based on the available climate and operational data, it is estimated that the operation will require approximately 2,200 m3/day of make-up water on average over the operating life of the mine. The make-up water will come from a number of sources including runoff from the waste storage facility (seepage collection pond), plant site runoff and from the water supply reservoir. Make-up water will only be taken from the water supply reservoir when insufficient make-up water is available from other sources of contact water on site. The remainder of the process water requirements will come from recycle from the thickeners and filter plant, as well as seepage and runoff recycled from the seepage and runoff collection pond.

 

18.14Process plant

 

For further detailed description refer to Section 17. The selected flowsheet represents a very conventional, low-risk approach to silver extraction, and consists of the following unit operations:

 

·ROM receiving, crushing, and crushed rock storage.
·Stockpile discharge, grinding via SAG milling, and ball milling.
·SAG mill pebble crushing via SAG mill pebble ports, scalping screen, recycle conveyors, and cone crusher.
·Pre-leach thickening and cyanide leaching using stirred, oxygen sparged tanks.
·Liquid / solid separation using counter-current decantation (thickeners).
·Recovery of silver from pregnant leach solution using a zinc precipitation process followed by drying and smelting with fluxes to produce silver doré bars.
·Filtration of leach residues.
·Conveying of filter cake and long-term storage at the tailing storage area.
·Crusher and conveyor locations shown in plant layout below.

 

There is currently no infrastructure on site.

 

The plant layout is shown in Figure 18.7.

 

amcconsultants.com282

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 18.7Topography and infrastructure plant layout

  

Source: Halyard Inc., 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com283

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

19Market studies and contracts

 

19.1Market studies

 

The Silver Sand Project will produce doré bars that will contain at least 95% silver. Impurities consist mainly of base metals, which must be removed to produce silver bullion of 99.9% purity. The global market for silver doré of this quality is very well established, and refineries around the world are willing to purchase and refine doré for bullion production.

 

Silver, whether in 99.9% bullion form or otherwise, is considered a global commodity and is widely traded through a variety of outlets. As such, a project-specific market study is considered unnecessary at this stage of the project. Silver bullion is commonly traded through the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) and via futures contracts on The Commodity Exchange Inc. (COMEX) in New York.

 

Relative to global markets such as copper or gold, the global silver market is less significant in value. According to data published by the Silver Institute, total silver supply in 2023 reached 1,011 million ounces (Moz) and demand outstripped that by approximately 184 Moz. Global mine production fell by 1% (year on year) in 2023 to 830 Moz with primary silver production making up 28% (235 Moz) of that amount.

 

With an average 2023 spot silver price of US$23.35 per ounce, the value of total silver supply in 2023 reached US$23.6 billion.

 

As a result of its relatively small market value, the price of silver can be somewhat variable/volatile. This makes short-term predictions and/or forecasts less reliable. However, plotting the price of silver over the last 5 years (Figure 19.1) a long-term rising price trend is readily apparent. Calculating average prices over various time periods within this 5-year window, the average values are noted in Table 19.1.

 

Table 19.1Average silver prices by period

 

Period Value (US$/Oz)
June 2019 – May 2024 (5 Years) 22.2
June 2020 – May 2024 (4 Years) 23.6
June 2021 – May 2024 (3 Years) 23.3
June 2022 – May 2024 (2 Years) 22.9
June 2023 – May 2024 (1 Year) 24.2

 

amcconsultants.com284

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 19.1Historical silver prices (May 2019 to May 2024)

 

 

Source: LBMA (London Bullion Market Association) London PM Fix, 2024.

 

For the Silver Sand project, the QP has reviewed a selection of consensus forecasts and public disclosures by existing silver producers, in addition to recent publications by the Silver Institute and the CPM Group. These references, together with the price history and trend analysis given above, indicate that a silver price of US$24.00 per troy ounce is an applicable input to the PFS economic analysis.

 

Other price assumptions, used for resource and reserve calculations, are given in Section 14 and Section 15, respectively.

 

19.2Contracts

 

Several contracts are envisaged for the project, however none of these are in place or are being negotiated at the time of writing.

 

19.2.1Product sales contracts

 

Although these are considered necessary once operations commence, no contracts for the sale of silver doré are in place at this stage of project development.

 

amcconsultants.com285

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The PFS has assumed typical contract terms for the product, including a 99.5% payable for the silver content of doré, and a $0.20 per troy ounce refining charge.

 

Doré must be transported from site to the refinery, and a transportation and insurance cost of $0.25 per troy ounce has been included in the PFS economic analysis.

 

New Pacific does not presently plan to hedge silver sales, and the PFS has assumed products would be sold on the spot market.

 

19.2.2Services and supplies

 

In addition to the typical supply contracts for various consumables including grinding media, explosives, process plant reagents, and maintenance spares, the PFS envisages several contract services, including inter alia:

 

·Supply of power
·Mining operations contractor
·Specialized services for processing
·Miscellaneous consulting services
·Transportation of personnel

 

These would typically be negotiated and finalized closer to the commencement of operations.

 

amcconsultants.com286

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

20Environmental studies, permitting and social or community impact

 

20.1Introduction

 

In order to obtain the environmental license for the Arena de Plata (Silver Sand) mining project in the department of Potosí, New Pacific is preparing studies and activities that will allow it to provide a comprehensive Analytical Environmental Impact Assessment Study (EEIA-AI) in accordance with the current environmental legislation in force in the Plurinational State of Bolivia, a study that is prepared by an independent engineering firm and registered with the Plurinational State of Bolivia (www.tierralta.org).

 

In the area there are current sources of pollution that come from activities other than those proposed by New Pacific, such as mining carried out by local community members and/or mining cooperatives and agricultural activities. Additionally, within the sector there is evidence of abandoned mining operations with environmental liabilities, that in some cases are sources of contamination such as Acid Rock Drainage (ARD).

 

20.2Environmental legislation and applicable procedures

 

According to the model of living well, in harmony, balance, care and protection of Mother Earth, the Silver Sand mining project, is subject to compliance with Bolivian laws and regulations on environmental matters, it is important to highlight:

 

·The Political Constitution of the State (CPE), decreed on 7 February 2009, has the purposes and goals of constituting a just and harmonious society, to guarantee the well-being, preserving plurinational diversity as historical and human heritage and promoting the responsible and planned use of natural resources in preserving the environment, for the well-being of current and future generations.
·Law 071, Law on the Rights of Mother Earth, enacted on 21 December 2010, aims to recognize the rights of Mother Earth, as well as the obligations and duties of the Plurinational State and society to ensure respect for these rights.
·Law 300, Framework Law of Mother Earth and Integral Development for Living Well, promulgated on 15 October 2012, establishes the vision and foundations of integral development in harmony and balance with Mother Earth for Living Well, within the framework of the complementarity of rights, obligations and duties of all sectors of the central level of the Plurinational State of Bolivia and the autonomous territorial entities.
·Law No. 1333 “Environmental Law” enacted on 27 April 1992, is the fundamental axis of national environmental policy and marks the formal beginning of the Bolivian environmental regulation process. The main objective of this Law is to protect and conserve the environment without affecting the development of the country. This Law includes aspects related to renewable and non-renewable natural resources, environmental education, citizen participation, sanctions, and others.
·The Regulations of the Environmental Law, promulgated by Supreme Decree 24176 of 8 December 1995, issue six regulations referring to:

¾General Environmental Management Regulation (Reglamento General de Gestión Ambiental; RGGA).
¾Environmental Prevention and Control Regulation (Reglamento de Prevención y Control Ambiental; RPCA).
¾Regulation on Atmospheric Contamination (Reglamento en materia de Contaminación Atmosférica; RMCA).
¾Water Pollution Regulation (Reglamento en materia de Contaminación Hídrica; RMCH).
¾Regulation for Handling of Hazardous Substances (Reglamento para Manejo de Sustancias Peligrosas; RMSP).

 

amcconsultants.com287

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

¾Regulation for Solid Waste Management (Reglamento de Gestión de Residuos Sólidos; RGRS).

·The Environmental Regulations for Mining Activities (Reglamento Ambiental para Actividades Mineras; RAAM), promulgated by Supreme Decree 24782 in 1997. The RAAM expressly points out the need for comprehensive environmental management in mining from its inception, from the exploration phase to the closure and abandonment of mining activities.
·Law No. 535, the Mining and Metallurgy Law, enacted on 28 May 2014, aims to regulate mining-metallurgical activities by establishing principles, guidelines, and procedures for the development and continuity of activities in a responsible, planned, and sustainable manner.

 

In addition, for the preparation of the studies, related regulations are considered, among which Law No. 530 of the Bolivian Archaeological Heritage and its regulations, Ministerial Resolutions, Administrative Resolutions issued by national, departmental and/or municipal authorities, environmental guides, among others, stand out.

 

According to the legal procedure, the review of the Environmental Categorization Form (Formulario de Categorización Ambiental; FNCA) and the Environmental Impact Assessment Study (EEIA-AI) will be executed by:

 

·The competent sectoral body (Organismo Sectorial Competente; OSC): Environment Unit of the Directorate of Environment and Public consultation under the Ministry of Mining and Metallurgy (MMM).
·National Competent Environmental Authority (Autoridad Ambiental Competente Nacional; AACN): General Directorate of Environment and Climate Change, under the Ministry of Environment and Water (Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Agua; MMAYA).

 

As it is a project that is not located within a protected area, the national service of protected areas (or Servicio Nacional de Areas Protegidas; SERNAP) does not participate in the review of the studies.

 

20.3Baseline conditions

 

20.3.1Introduction

 

The socio-environmental description and characterization of the area includes the studies of the abiotic, biotic, and socioeconomic environments that could potentially be positively or negatively affected by the mining project in its areas of influence.

 

From the environmental point of view, the areas of influence (direct and indirect) have been defined based on guidelines established in the Methodology for the Identification of Environmental Impacts published by the Ministry of Environment and Water, a document that is not exhaustive and that was complemented with contributions from a multidisciplinary team of environmental science professionals, social sciences, and other specialties.

 

20.3.2Baseline of surface water, groundwater, water for human consumption

 

Sampling has been carried out since 2019, prioritizing a monitoring network design, constantly updated, which allows establishing evaluation sites with a basin approach, prioritizing the collection of monthly data and the collection of data in representative periods of dry season (September) and rainy season (March).

 

Within the study area, and for the purposes of the surface water baseline, three basins have been identified, in which 20 evaluation sites have been defined, which allow establishing, on a monthly basis, the current conditions of the watercourses, specifically the quality of the waters and their flow.

 

amcconsultants.com288

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

For water quality, 59 parameters were analyzed on a monthly basis, including physical, chemical, and microbiological in 20 evaluation sites. These sites have been modified based on the dynamics of the monitoring plan, as a result of the need to obtain data from more relevant sites within the areas of influence and area of study.

 

New Pacific has data for 154 samples, obtained between 2019 and 2023. Figure 20.1 shows the distribution of samples by location.

 

Figure 20.1Distribution of samples by location

 

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp, 2024.

 

Measurement of flows were carried out at different evaluation sites to obtain flow data from watercourses with and without permanent flow.

 

The monitoring network for surface water considered the collection of data in headwaters, middle, and lower parts of the micro-basins and basins that are part of the study area, an aspect that allows the identification of the environmental conditions of the project in these sectors.

 

In general, existing heavy metal acid contamination was found in the area, especially sectors of the Aullagas, Machacamarca, Aguas abajo de San Andrés de Huayllani, Canutillos and Ancomarca.

 

All the data obtained have been compared with permissible limits established in the Water Pollution Regulation and with the Environmental Regulation for Mining Activities (RAAM) as applicable and appropriate. For the specific case of groundwater, hydrological, and hydrogeological studies have been carried out to determine the hydrogeological units: one alluvial aquifer unit and two fractured aquifers. Preliminary piezometry indicates that groundwater flow follows topography and major surface water streams, such as the Machacamarca River.

 

amcconsultants.com289

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Hydrochemistry indicates that the surface water samples correspond to fresh water, close to the recharge area of the basin, with the exception of the samples located downstream, which have different chemical composition, probably due to local mining activities, an aspect that coincides with the information obtained from surface water sampling.

 

Regarding the quality of drinking water, water samples have been taken from water supply sources for human consumption in the communities where the project has influence, to determine the quality, origin, storage, accessibility, in addition to other data collected in surveys or local interviews. Obtaining water quality data from different sources of supply (public pool, household pools, wells, waterwheels, cisterns, springs, others) in the communities that are part of the areas of influence allows us to determine the current situation with respect to a basic elementary service. For the purposes of interpreting the results, the regulatory compendium for drinking water, published by the Ministry of Environment and Water (NB 512, Regulation NB 512, NB 495, NB 496), was used as a reference.

 

20.3.3Air quality / environmental risk baseline

 

Regarding air quality, the execution of semi-annual monitoring has been considered for more representative parameters and defined in the Atmospheric Pollution Regulation (RMCA), prioritizing the collection of data in representative periods of dry season and rainy season, to date between the period 2022 and 2023, 11 measurements have been obtained in different evaluation sites that have been established in a monitoring program, prioritizing the homes within communities present in the study area, existing roads, and in sectors where infrastructure that will be part of the mining operation will be implemented in the future. Environmental noise has been monitored at the same evaluation sites.

 

20.3.4Soil and sediment baseline

 

Regarding the baseline for soil and sediments, Bolivia does not have environmental regulations to allow comparisons to determine the quality, however, the baseline makes comparisons based on soil environmental regulations of other countries in addition to other guidelines prepared by institutions such as the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).

 

Regarding soil / sediment quality, the execution of semi-annual monitoring for 42 parameters has been considered, prioritizing the collection of data in representative periods of dry season and rainy season, between the period 2022 and 2023, 18 samples have been obtained at evaluation sites that have been established in the monitoring program, prioritizing places such as: cultivated soils, uncultivated soils, special sectors, sediments of the most representative watercourses or sectors with the presence of contamination by other activities existing in the study area (illegal mining, mining cooperatives, mining environmental liabilities of others).

 

20.3.5Biological baseline

 

Based on the main findings of the biological baseline study in dry and wet seasons it can be concluded that:

 

Flora:

 

·Flora was reviewed at 17 designated sites and 3,272 plant data and 1,319 physical records (stone, soil, stubble, and feces) have been recorded. 30 families, 57 genres, and 87 species have been identified.

 

amcconsultants.com290

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

·Four threatened species have been recorded: Azorella compacta “yareta” and Polylepis tomentella and Polylepis besserim both “keñua”, both in the Endangered (EN) category, and Trichocereus cf. tarijensis “cardón” in the Vulnerable (VU) category. All of the cacti species are listed in CITES Appendix II.

 

Large and small mammals:

 

·In the sites evaluated in the localities Huayllani, Calimali, El Fuerte and Ancomarca, a total of 17 species of mammals were identified during both seasons, these species are distributed in five orders, 11 families and 15 genres. The family with the highest number of species was Cricetidae with five species, the rest of the families with only one species, respectively.
·The locality with the highest number of records was Calimali with 12 species, followed by Ancomarca with 11, then Villa Trapiche with 10, San Andrés de Huayllani with 9 and finally Del Fuerte, with four species.
·Of all the mammal species recorded, one species Leopardus geoffroyi is found in CITES I. From all the data obtained in the field, local inhabitants indicate that this species still maintains stable populations in the vicinity (mountain ranges) of the communities of Ancomarca and Calimali, so its food availability and habitats are likely also abundant.
·In the present study, no species have been reported in the Red Book of Vertebrate Wildlife of Bolivia (2009), but they have been reported in CITES I (Leopardus geoffroyi).
·A species of wide global distribution and invasive was identified, Lepus europaeus (hare). It was recorded at all study sites.

 

Herpetology:

 

·A total of ten species were recorded, six amphibians and four reptiles.
·The species recorded represent the typical community for species of puna habitats above 4000 masl, made up of Rhinella spinulosa, one to two species of Telmatobius spp., Boana riojana, Gastrotheca marsupiata, Pleurodema cinereum, and in reptiles, two to three species of lizards of the genus Liolaemus spp., and the altoantine snake Tachymenis peruviana, so it can be indicated that in terms of richness and composition the study achieved results that adequately represented the herpetofauna community for the High Andean Puna area, in the case of the lowest points corresponding to inter-Andean dry valleys (3600 to 3800 masl), it would be expected to record some additional species with a longer sampling time.
·The presence of two endemic species, Telmatobius cf. hintoni and Telmatobius cf. simonsi, both, under some category of threat at the national level (both as Vulnerable (VU)); and global (Telmatobius cf. hintoni as Vulnerable (VU) and Telmatobius cf. simonsi Critically Endangered (CR)). The case of T. cf. simonsi, which would constitute the first record for Potosí, expanding its geographical and altitudinal distribution. From indications of dead individuals, it is very possible that there is chytrid in the study area, therefore, the record of good populations for aquatic amphibian species is an important reference in terms of actions to be taken for their conservation. The record of Rhinella spinulosa is highlighted, since its populations have been reported in Bolivia in decline, being apparently stable in this area. In the case of reptiles, there is a record of a probable new species of Liolaemus sp. nov., however, to be confirmed, field scientific collections are required, as for Telmatobius spp.

 

amcconsultants.com291

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Ornithology

 

·A total of 61 species of birds distributed in 25 families and 16 orders were recorded. Among the species evaluated, two have been found with national and international threat status, being the Andean condor (Vultur gryphus) with the category of Vulnerable (VU) and the giant coot (Fulica gigantea) with national category of Vulnerable (VU), whose threats are closely linked to anthropogenic activities and particularly mining.
·No species under national or international extinction category have been detected, however, it was possible to register an endemic species of Bolivia, the chickadee flowerhopper (Diglossa carbonaria) which is closely associated with Kewiña forests (Polylepis sp.), likewise two species with a threatened category have been registered during the evaluation time period. These were the Andean condor (Vultur gryphus) with the category of Vulnerable (VU) and the giant coot (Fulica gigantea) with the national category of Vulnerable (VU), whose threats are closely linked to anthropogenic activities and particularly to mining.
·Evidence of disturbance identified is primarily due to existing mining activities (cooperatives and illegal mining), either due to discharges into the tributaries and effluents of the different basins within the study area or also in the form of noise pollution, which causes many of the bird species to be deterred from remaining in the area. since they are very sensitive to disturbances in their environment.

 

Aquatic Life / Ichthyology

 

·All the aquatic systems analyzed present some degree of contamination, mainly of mining origin (mining cooperatives, illegal mining, environmental liabilities). In most of the systems analyzed, biological communities with very low richness and diversity are found, with aquatic systems with a total absence of aquatic vegetation (filamentous algae and higher aquatic plants), as well as aquatic fauna (zooplankton, benthos or aquatic macroinvertebrates), also resulting in the absence of fish communities.
·In the study area, the presence of a single species belonging to the genus Trichomycterus is found. The species was captured in an aquatic system in the town of Calimali, also presenting an evident low density.
·All the aquatic systems in the study area show evidence of material contribution, which increases the presence of dissolved solids that precipitate in the beds of rivers and streams mainly in the form of sand.
·The main source of contamination and disturbances is local mining activity, which is also associated with other activities related to the extraction and transport of minerals, the construction of road and road infrastructure affects aquatic systems, particularly with the construction of speed bumps that cross rivers, affecting their structure and flows.

 

Aquatic life / macroinvertebrates

 

·The evaluation sites have a higher percentage of aquatic macroinvertebrates tolerant to pollution and in turn this group is composed of abundant taxa. This situation may be due to three types of impacts on the study area, mining, human settlements, and agriculture. These impacts have an impact on water quality, which was evidenced by the calculation of the BMWP / Bol index, categorizing the 16 evaluation sites in biological condition of Doubtful, Critical, and Very Critical.
·In terms of the Ecological Integrity Index, which brings together both the biological conditions and the characteristics of the riverbank, river habitat and anthropogenic impact, it resulted in two categories which are Terrible and Bad.

 

Baseline dry season studies conclude that the species accumulation curve indicates higher probability of finding more species in the assessment during the wet season.

 

amcconsultants.com292

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

20.3.6Social baseline

 

As established in the document “Methodology for the Identification of Environmental Impacts” by the Ministry of Environment and Water of Bolivia, the baseline describes “the current conditions of the area of influence (direct and indirect) of the activity, work or project (...)”.

 

The scope of the social baseline (LBS) covers the surface territory of the communities of Machacamarca, San Andrés de Huayllani, El Fuerte, as part of the area of direct social influence; and Canutillos and Orko Cocha, as part of the area of indirect influence. All of these are located in the municipality of Tacobamba. This municipality is in the province of Cornelio Saavedra, in the department of Potosí.

 

The characterization of the communities was carried out with different secondary sources, using quantitative and qualitative techniques. The following dimensions were addressed:

 

·Demography: total population, five-year age groups, population by sex, number of households, dwellings and household members, migration, emigration.
·Housing: type of tenure, type of property, property titles, building materials, type of water supply, toilets, lighting, sources of energy for domestic use, solid waste management mode, main communication routes, transportation.
·Culture: mother tongue, religion, belonging to indigenous or native peoples.
·Education: educational attainment, illiteracy rate, student rate, school attendance, dropout and school backwardness; access to basic, intermediate and higher education, and main professional careers.
·Health: causes and rates of morbidity and mortality, available health centers, traditional practices, rate of doctors, promoters, and beds by population, and average transportation time to the health center.
·Economic activities: working-age population, economically active and inactive population, and occupation categories.
·Territory: use of soil and natural resources, characteristics of agricultural production.

 

The sources of information used are presented below. Updated information from the education and health sectors with jurisdiction in the communities in the area of social influence from the following sources was used:

 

·INE: National Population and Housing Census 2012.
·INE: Agricultural Census 2013.
·“Final Report: Socioeconomic Baseline, Risk Analysis and Community Engagement Recommendations for New Pacific Metals Corp – Silver Sands Project in the Department of Potosí-Bolivia, 2018”.
·“Territorial Plan for Integral Development 2016-2020” of the Autonomous Municipal Government of Tacobamba.

 

In general terms, it is a mainly rural environment, with a population with a slight male predominance, which has migrated permanently or intermittently to nearby cities such as Potosí. Therefore, the bulk of the population is mainly in the range of 0 to 24 years of age. As for the houses, they are their own, although built with precarious materials (adobe walls, dirt floors, thatched or calamine roofs). Access to water supply, toilets, and lighting is limited. The population has Quechua as their mother tongue.

 

Access to educational services within the communities is limited, with a high rate of illiteracy and educational attainment, mainly primary. While access to health services is through public

 

amcconsultants.com293

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

establishments in Colavi and traditional doctors in their own communities. The main economic activity is agriculture, although mining cooperatives have also been identified in Machacamarca and San Andrés de Huayllani, which are dedicated to extracting silver, which is marketed to mills in the area, rescuers or other informal buyers. However, in San Andrés de Huayllani it was declared that it was also sold to formal marketers. As for the use of the territory, a large part of the land is destined for the homes of the community members and other inhabitants, as well as for agriculture and livestock, linked to the productive land given to each community member. Likewise, there is land on which the educational units and local health establishments are located. Another important activity, linked to land use, is mining, with areas of exploitation by cooperatives or independent miners. The breeding of large animals, mainly sheep and camelids, was recorded; and small animals.

 

It should be noted that the presence of New Pacific (and the previous owners of the project) in the communities dates back to the exploration stage of the Project in 2012. Since New Pacific (and previous owners of the project) have had a presence in the communities in the area of social influence, it has participated in multiple communal assemblies, meetings with authorities and conversations with interest groups and community members. Various activities were discussed that will benefit the population, such as the construction of social infrastructure, education scholarships, water supply, hiring of community members, transportation services, among others.

 

Likewise, a Community Relations Plan specific to the exploitation stage has been developed, which has three programs: Social Impact Management Program, Local Benefit Generation Programs, and Stakeholder Involvement Program. It has also made available to community members and authorities various mechanisms for citizen participation, such as attending the Information Office in the city of Potosí, preparing and delivering informative material, and holding informative meetings. In order to achieve a successful process, this community relations strategy will continue, expanding the mechanisms and spaces for dialogue.

 

20.3.7Archaeological baseline

 

An archaeological baseline study was conducted in the study area of the project, this research documented 32 archaeological, historical, and ethnographic entities that include a total of 463 architectural and landscape features, which have been identified, recorded, and evaluated for their archaeological importance, their heritage value and the potential impact they could suffer from the project activity.

 

The results of the extensive explorations and stratigraphic surveys do not report the detection or finding of archaeological material evidence that accounts for the presence of pre-Hispanic settlements within the area covered by the project.

 

Only 10 of the 32 architectural complexes recorded presented material antecedents of occupation during the colonial phase, but most of these were rebuilt and remodeled in later phases, mainly during the Republican Phase, which runs between 1830 and 1920.

 

The archaeological assessment of the registered sites indicates that only 11 sites show values of archaeological interest and of these, only six show high value, among which are Piquiza, Machacamarca Antiguo, the Camp around the Machacamarca Rescue Bank, and the mills located in Huayllani and the streams that converge in the town of Machacamarca.

 

amcconsultants.com294

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

At the heritage level, seven groups have sufficient attributes to enter this category, three with medium value, two with high value, and two with very high value, the main ones being those that are protected by municipal (LM 038/2020) and departmental (LD 144/2020) laws and groups ten of Huayllani (Ingenio de San Andrés) and 19 of Jatun Pampa (Poblado de Piquiza).

 

The possibility of a potentially zero impact on 25 entities (78%), mild on one entity (3%), moderate on one unit (3%), severe on one entity (3%) and a potentially critical impact on four entities (13%) has been observed. These last four entities are the ones that include 60% of the architectural structures in the study area (Complexes of old Machacamarca, Rescue Bank of Machacamarca or San Jorge, Aullagas, and the upper area of the Alalaypata ravine).

 

Based on the above results, and in accordance with current regulations, mitigation measures have been defined for each identified architectural complex, considering the following possibilities: Strict Exclusion, Effective Precaution, Preventive Precaution, and Compensatory Measures; all of them subject to the definition of zoning in the Management Plan of the heritage area proposed by local laws.

 

20.3.8Public Consultation process

 

The Public Consultation is a mechanism for citizen participation that allows citizens, communities, and indigenous peoples to have access to information on mining ventures and projects.

 

The Public Consultation is mandatory and concludes when the operator submits its report to the competent environmental authority, justifying if the criteria of the population affected by the mining operation have been taken into account.

 

Public Consultation is fully instituted in the Political Constitution of the State, applying to activities that involve the exploitation of natural resources, which may directly affect the affected population, so that the use and exploitation of natural resources must be subject to compliance with technical regulations. It is therefore possible to implement a process that complements to the methodology of the Public Consultation for Environmental Impact Assessment Studies. As part of the application of the environmental impact assessment systems and environmental quality control, without exception and in a transversal manner to all activities of production of goods and services that use, transforms or affects natural resources and the environment, since non-compliance with the law will lead to the reversion or annulment of the rights of use or exploitation in accordance with the provisions of Article 358 of the Magna Carta.

 

The participation of the social actors linked to the EEIA is established in current environmental regulations and it establishes that during the review phase of the Environmental Category Level Form, the EEIA, or the granting of the Environmental License (EIS), any natural or collective person through the territorial grassroots organizations, may make known in writing its observations, criticisms and proposals regarding a project, work or activity, before the competent environmental authority, competent sectoral body or municipal government, within the scope of its jurisdiction, in a technically and legally supported manner.

 

The regulations establish that, in the phase of identification of impacts, in order to consider an EEIA, the Public Consultation must be carried out, to take into account the observations, suggestions, and recommendations of the beneficiary and/or affected population, in the area of intervention of the project, for this it must have dissemination documentation in addition to the documentation of the EEIA, which must be made known to the population through procedures established in the regulations.

 

amcconsultants.com295

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Once the mining company completes the preparation of its EEIA-AI, it will promote the execution of the Public Consultation, in which a notarized act must be generated, that is, a legal document that will contain the points and aspects of conformity and observations of the community on the mining operation in Public Consultation and the socio-environmental impact that it could generate. In Bolivia, the Public Consultation process occurs late in the permitting process and has not currently been initiated for the Silver Sand Project.

 

20.3.9Waste management

 

Based on the provisions of mining environmental regulations, the accumulations of solid mining-metallurgical waste must be classified based on their volume and hazardousness, in this sense, according to the size of the facilities that will store solid and/or liquid waste, the execution of a project for the accumulation of large volume waste (total projected volume greater than 50,000 m3), which must consider technical guidelines established in the environmental regulations for the mining sector.

 

A total of ten core samples and 50 samples of coarse assay reject materials were analyzed to assess the potential for acid generation within the waste rock materials. Samples were analyzed.

 

Based on the analysis completed, the waste rock materials have been classified by total sulphur content as follows:

 

·Sulphur content less than 1.0%;
·Sulphur content between 1.0% and 2.0%; and
·Sulphur content greater than 2.0%.

 

Static testing on all samples of waste rock included: Whole Rock Analysis, ICP Elemental Analysis, and Acid Base Accounting (Modified Sobek). In addition, kinetic testing was completed on three samples of waste rock within the ranges of sulphur content noted above, to assess the potential rate of acidification that may occur by Humidity Cell testing.

 

Based on the test work completed to date, the waste rock with higher total sulphur content (>2%) appears to have a higher potential for generating acidity than lower sulphur content waste rock materials. In addition, samples of this material tend to consume the buffering capacity of the waste rock, resulting in acidification, in a shorter period of time in the testing completed, when compared to the lower sulphur content waste rock.

 

The testing also indicated that all samples tested in the humidity cells showed a slightly depressed pH from the first week of testing, while there was limited change in pH over the 30 weeks of testing. The test results also show that leachate from the waste rock has slightly elevated levels of some metals following the first weekly testing cycle, with concentration of these metals remaining relatively constant over the full period of testing.

 

A total of four samples of process detox tailings were characterized using the same suite of testing as completed for the waste rock samples. While the neutralizing potential of the tailings was assessed to be lower than that acid potential, during the 27 weeks of testing, none of the samples produced acidic leachate. Some samples showed elevated levels of dissolved Silver, Cadmium, and Copper after the first weekly testing cycle, with limited change in the concentrations over the remaining period of testing of the samples.

 

For the Silver Sand Project, waste rock from the pit, tailings from the processing plant, and general waste have been considered. Waste rock that is not potentially acid generating, or not shown to generate acidic runoff, will be used in the construction of the TSF embankment, the water dam and for other projects on site, with the remainder placed in the in-pit and external waste dumps.

 

amcconsultants.com296

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Waste rock from the open pit that is shown to go acidic in the humidity cell tests will be placed inside the lined containment of the TSF and co-mingled with the process tailings. Approximately 3% of the waste rock is expected to be in this category.

 

Encapsulating of the high sulphur content waste rock within the tailings will preclude exposure to oxidation which will ultimately result in generation of acidity. In addition, encapsulation will provide additional buffering capacity in the tailings to neutralize any acidity generated in the waste rock.

 

Tailings from the process plant will be placed within the lined TSF. Any surface contact water collected within this facility will be reclaimed to the process plant for re-use in the milling process. General waste from the site office and shop facilities will be treated in accordance with local requirements and legislation.

 

20.4Mine closure plan

 

The closure plan is an environmental management instrument that establishes guidelines to be carried out in a mining operation, in order to rehabilitate the intervened and impacted areas.

 

The Mining Law in Bolivia establishes that a mining operator must establish an accounting provision to cover the cost of closing operations.

 

The Environmental Regulations for Mining Activities oblige the concessionaire or mining operator to close and rehabilitate the area of its mining activity when it ends, in whole or in part, its activities in accordance with its environmental license; or when it abandons its mining operations or activities for more than three years.

 

The closure plans minimally consider: i) the objectives of the closure and rehabilitation of the area; ii) a program for the closure of operations and rehabilitation of the area, iii) the control of pollutant flows and the physical and chemical stabilization of waste accumulations; (iv) rehabilitation of the area, surface drainage and erosion control; v) post-closure actions, which are the control of the stability of the structure of the accumulations of waste and the monitoring of the flows of drains, tank gutters, dams or closed fills and batteries of infiltration monitoring wells.

 

New Pacific have been in contact with local communities to discuss options for the closure plan and will continue these discussions through the development of the final closure plan. The closure plan is expected to be completed following operations. At this stage the closure plan considers re-sloping of disturbed areas and the placement of topsoil as possible followed by revegetation. The TSF will be capped and covered with topsoil and revegetated. Facilities will be removed where possible. Surface drainages will be rehabilitated to manage erosion. Monitoring of water and drainage from the disturbed areas will continue post closure to ensure commitments have been met prior to return of the project to the government and communities.

 

20.5Environmental guarantees

 

The mining law in Bolivia establishes that a mining operator must establish an accounting provision to cover the cost of closing operations, however, it does not establish other environmental guarantees as is the case in other countries in the Andean region.

 

amcconsultants.com297

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

21Capital and operating costs

 

All currency is in US dollars (US$) and are based on prices obtained during the second quarter of 2024 (Q2 2024). Costs for the project have been estimated based on a hybrid owner-contractor project delivery model.

 

21.1Responsible parties

 

The responsibility of providing various capital and operating cost inputs for the project financial model are as follows:

 

·Mining – Costs related to the development and operation of the open pit mine, surface haul roads, and stockpiles were developed by AMC Consultants. QP Mr W Rogers has relied on HydroTechnica Ltd. to develop mine dewatering costs but accepts them as reasonable and takes responsibility for them.
·Processing – Costs related to the construction and operation of mineral processing infrastructure were developed by Halyard Inc. QP Mr A Holloway takes responsibility for those costs.
·Tailings storage & the water dam – Costs related to the transportation and storage of tailings and the water dam were developed by NewFields Canada Mining & Environment ULC. QP Mr L. Botham takes responsibility for those costs.
·Site Infrastructure – Costs related to the deployment of site infrastructure and earthworks to support the on-site camp, mobile maintenance workshop, explosives storage, fuel storage infrastructure, transmission infrastructure, communications, and network infrastructure were developed by AMC Consultants. QP Mr M Molavi takes responsibility for those costs.
·General & admin – Costs related to permitting, community compensation and projects, logistics, administration, and labour were developed by New Pacific. QP Mr W Rogers takes responsibility for those costs.

 

21.2Operating cost estimate

 

The operating cost estimate allows for all labour, equipment, supplies, power, consumables, supervision, technical services, as well as general and administrative (G&A) costs. The overall operating cost was estimated at 1,281 US$ million (US$M), excluding capitalized operating costs. The average operating cost over the LOM can be expressed as 8.16 US$/Troy Oz. of silver produced and as 24.63 US$/tonne milled. An overview of average LOM costs by activity is presented in Table 21.1.

 

Table 21.1Average LOM unit operating cost summary

 

Operating cost category Total costs Cost per payable Oz produced Cost per tonne
US$M US$/Troy Oz. US$/tonne milled
Mining 482 3.07 9.28
Processing & tailings 713 4.54 13.71
G&A 86 0.54 1.65
Total operating cost 1,281 8.16 24.63

 

Notes: The totals may not sum due to rounding.

 

amcconsultants.com298

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

21.2.1Mining cost

 

Open pit mining costs were estimated for a contract mining operation. Costs were built up on a first principles basis using supporting data from quotes provided by New Pacific, quotes from contractors, and AMC Consultant’s internal database of costs. The open pit operating cost is composed of the following items and activities:

 

·Drilling and blasting.
·Loading and hauling to the processing plant, waste dump, and stockpiles.
·Stockpile re-handle.
·Pit, waste dump, and stockpile dozing.
·Haul road maintenance.
·Auxiliary activities and equipment costs for items such as pickup trucks, crew buses, light plants, generators, utility equipment, and logistics equipment such as forklifts, equipment float trucks, and flat deck transportation trucks.
·Mobile equipment maintenance.
·Management and technical staff.
·Pit dewatering.
·Geotechnical support for the pit walls and waste rock dumps.
·Grade control sampling for drilling and blasting.

 

21.2.1.1Labour

 

Staff were divided into two broad categories for the open pit operating cost estimate:

 

·Fixed staffing – Fixed staff requirements are constant and independent of mine production. This includes management, admin, and technical staff.
·Variable staff – Variable staff requirements are based on mine production & equipment productivity. Variable staffing requirements vary by schedule period. This includes equipment operators, blasters, and mobile maintenance staff.

 

All staff were assigned to a two-weeks on, one-week off shift schedule. Personnel from the contractor’s team will be staffed around the clock with three crews in total. Two crews will be active on day and night shift at a time, with an inactive third crew on days off. The three-crew roster requires the start and end time of each shift set to be staggered by 7 days. Only one crew was assigned to the owner’s team. This is summarized in Table 21.2, with the shift configuration summarized in Table 21.3.

 

Table 21.2Shift coverage and crew count

 

Team Shift coverage Number of crews
Owner’s team Day shift only 1
Contractor’s team Day and night shift 3

 

amcconsultants.com299

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 21.3Shift schedule configuration

 

  Shift schedule
Item Units 2 WK ON / 1 WK OFF
Shift configuration
Shift length Hours / day 12
Days on Days / shift cycle 14
Days off Days / shift cycle 7
Leave
Annual leave / other Days / year 20
Long service / sick leave / special leave Days / year 5
Training / professional development Days / year 5
Annual leave / other Equiv. # of cycles / year 2.1
Shift cycles
No. of shift cycles before leave Cycle / year 17.4
Effective no. cycles per year Cycle / year 15.2
Avg. on-days per year, per shift Days / year 213
Avg. off-days per year, per shift Days / year 122

 

Projected salary cost estimates were obtained by New Pacific and provided to AMC Consultants for estimating labour costs. Salary costs were quoted in Bolivian Bolivianos (BS) per month at a FOREX rate of 6.96 BS/US$. Salary cost estimates were not available for all positions on-site. Salaries for unlisted positions were based on rates for similar positions. For instance, salary rates for drillers were assumed to be similar to those of dozer operators. Contractor salaries include a 15% mark-up.

 

Salary and on-costs do not include expenses for ex-patriots (ex-pats) travelling to and from the site, or camp costs. Travel costs and camp costs are included as part of G&A costs in Section 21.2.3. Salary costs were escalated at a rate of 3% per year with the guidance of New Pacific.

 

AMC Consultants assumed that most positions will be staffed by locals. Select fixed staff positions are fly-in, fly-out (FIFO) and are designated for ex-pats. Fixed staffing requirements are presented in Table 21.4.

 

Table 21.4Fixed staffing summary for the open pit

 

Staff position Total people required
Mine Manager 1
Mine Superintendent 1
Mine Supervisor 3
Mine Foreman 3
Maintenance Superintendent 1
Maintenance Supervisor 1
Maintenance Foreman 1
Administration Assistant 1
Sr. Mining Engineer 1
Mining Engineer 3
Sr. Geologist 1
Geologist 2
Surveyor 2

 

amcconsultants.com300

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The open pit portion of the mine is planned to have a maximum of 283 people employed. Staffing requirements for the open pit are presented by year in Section 16.10.

 

21.2.1.2Equipment operating costs

 

Operating costs for equipment were built up from three components:

 

·Operator labour
·Fuel, maintenance parts, lube, and consumables
·Maintenance labour

 

Labour requirements for each piece of equipment were based on equipment productivity, annual operating hours and delays, and mine production requirements. Costs for fuel, maintenance parts, lube, and tires were based on average hourly cost quotes for equivalent equipment at similar operations, from AMC Consultant’s internal database. Operating costs were adjusted from similiar-sized equipment based on the sixth-tenths cost estimation methodology for items where costs were unavailable. The sixth-tenths methodology assumes a non-linear relationship between cost and capacity for equipment. An unknown equipment cost can be estimated by applying a factor to a known equipment cost, where the factor is calculated by dividing the capacity of the unknown equipment by that of the known equipment and raising the quotient to the power of 0.6. The QP believes that this methodology was applied reasonably considering the development stage of this project.

 

Labour costs for mechanics and welders were based on labour ratio assumptions for the number of maintenance staff required per operating machine. Labour ratios were assigned based on the type of machine to weigh maintenance labour requirements reasonably. Maintenance labour requirements vary over time according to the required operating fleet.

 

Equipment requirements for haul trucks, loading units, and drills were based on equipment productivity rates and scheduled mine production requirements. This is discussed further in Section 16.9.2. Other ancillary and support equipment requirements were derived from production requirements and assumptions by AMC Consultants for the following items:

 

·Pit dozing (building in-pit roads & ramps, building berms, dozing blast heaves, and preparing blast patterns for drilling)
·Waste dump dozing
·TSF dozing (spreading run-of-mine waste rock for constructing the TSF embankment)
·Stockpile dozing
·Grading haul roads
·Pit clean up (dig face clean up and haul road spillage clean up)
·Haul road dust suppression

 

Based on experience, AMC Consultants also made assumptions on requirements for the following supporting equipment:

 

·Pickup trucks
·Crew buses
·Mobile maintenance trucks and welding trucks
·Light plants
·Mine rescue ambulance
·Utility excavator
·Utility tractor

 

amcconsultants.com301

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

·Forklift
·Flat deck truck and trailer
·Equipment float truck
·Gensets
·Fuel truck
·Lube truck

 

21.2.1.3Drill and blast costs

 

Drill and blast costs were estimated based on AMC Consultant’s first principles cost build-up and a non-binding contractor quote. The combined drill and blast costs were estimated to be US$0.65/tonne mined. This cost includes the following items:

 

·Drill operating cost, including fuel, maintenance, consumables, and labour.
·Explosives and blasting accessories
·Blast crew labour and supporting equipment such as pickup trucks
·Stemming – sourcing / manufacturing, delivery, and loading
·Mobile mixing units (MMUs) for loading bulk explosives

 

21.2.1.4Other support mining costs

 

The mine operating cost also includes costs for other items such as dewatering the pit, grade control sampling, and geotechnical support services.

 

Dewatering costs include the operating cost of sump pumps as well as the development of horizontal drain holes. HydroTechnica estimated the annual operating cost by pit phase for sump pumping and assumed an energy cost of US$0.053/kWh for electricity. The cost of developing horizontal drain holes is estimated to be approximately US$125,000 per year.

 

AMC Consultants referenced similar projects for grade control sampling costs. AMC estimated grade control costs on the basis that all blastholes that are anticipated to contain ore will be sampled, and that 25% of blastholes are anticipated to contain waste will be sampled. Samples will be collected at a rate of one sample / selected blasthole. Sample testing costs were estimated to be US$6.00/sample.

 

The QP included an allowance for geotechnical support services for the open pit, waste rock dumps, and stockpiles. This includes monitoring, ongoing material testing, and consulting support (design revisions, site inspections, regulatory reporting, etc.). These costs are assumed to be higher during site development and will decrease to a steady state for ongoing reporting and inspections. Costs are assumed to increase in the final two full years of production. Other support mining costs include supervision staff from the contractor’s team, pit services (support) personnel for operations, and personnel from the owner’s team that are specifically assigned to support open pit operations. This includes:

 

·Mine Foreman
·Maintenance Superintendent
·Maintenance Foreman
·Sr. Mining Engineer
·Mining Engineers
·Sr. Geologist
·Geologists
·Surveyors

 

amcconsultants.com302

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The cost of other personnel from the owner’s team is included as part of general & administrative costs in Section 21.2.3 of this report.

 

Note that costs incurred during the pre-production period are capitalized. A summary of other mine operating costs is summarized in Table 21.5. Costs for dewatering and grade control sampling include a 15% contractor markup as they are part of the contractor’s operations.

 

Table 21.5 Summary of other mining costs

 

Other mining costs US$M (LOM total1)
Contractor supervision staff 4.9
Pit services support staff 3.1
Owner’s team (mining only) 12.9
Pit dewatering 2.3
Grade control sampling 1.0
Geotechnical support services 3.1
Total 27.3

 

Note1: Excludes capitalized operating costs.

 

21.2.1.5Open pit operating cost summary

 

Operating costs for the LOM have been summarized in Table 21.6. Operating costs presented do not include capitalized operating costs. These costs only include operating the open pit and do not include processing or tailings, general and administrative costs (G&A), capital costs, or any other costs.

 

Mine operating costs by period are presented in Table 21.7 and Figure 21.1.

 

Table 21.6 Mine operating cost summary

 

Mine unit operating costs Total US$M US$/tonne mined Percentage of total (%)
Loading 45.4 0.22 9
Hauling 220.1 1.07 46
Drilling 29.2 0.14 6
Blasting 103.7 0.50 21
Dozing 21.8 0.11 5
Road maintenance 23.8 0.12 5
Supporting equipment 11.2 0.05 2
Other mine operating costs 27.3 0.13 6
Total 482.5 2.34 100

 

Notes: The totals may not sum due to rounding.

 

amcconsultants.com303

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 21.7Mine operating cost by period, in US$M

 

Mine operating costs (US$M) Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Loading 45.4 3.7 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.7 3.7 3.9 3.8 3.8 4.1 3.8 3.4 2.0 0.1
Hauling 220.1 16.2 14.1 14.5 15.5 18.0 19.5 18.7 19.2 18.8 21.0 19.2 17.1 8.2 0.1
Drilling 29.2 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.0 2.7 2.2 2.2 1.1 0.0
Blasting 103.7 8.0 7.4 7.2 7.3 8.7 8.5 8.7 9.0 8.8 9.1 8.2 8.3 4.4 0.0
Dozing 21.8 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.6 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.2 1.3 1.1 0.5 0.0
Road maintenance 23.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.2 0.0
Supporting equipment 11.2 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.1
Other mine operating costs 27.3 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 3.1 3.1 0.1
Total 482.5 36.6 32.6 32.8 34.3 39.5 40.5 40.6 41.6 40.3 44.1 39.7 38.0 21.4 0.3

 

Notes: The totals may not sum due to rounding.

 

amcconsultants.com304

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 21.1Mine unit operating costs by period

 

 

Note: Mining is scheduled to finish in year 13. Costs planned post-year 13 are not shown in the above chart because they are not measured in terms of US$/tonne mined. The processing plant was scheduled to process the remaining stockpiled material in year 14.

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com305

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

21.2.2Processing & tailings operating costs

 

21.2.2.1Process operating costs

 

An estimate of operating costs for the 4 Mtpa process plant described in Section 17 was generated by Halyard Inc. The estimate was developed from first principles, using data from recent metallurgical test work, New Pacific’s in-country salary / benefit guidelines, established process design criteria, mass balance calculations, engineered process area specifications, equipment counts, and benchmarking against historical data for similar process plants. High-quality globally sourced suppliers were selected to supply the site via Chilean ports.

 

The operating cost breakdown includes reagents, consumables, personnel, electrical power, maintenance, and laboratory testing. The consumables accounted for in the operating costs include spare parts, grinding media, and liner and screen components. The main operating costs for the process plant are grinding media, electrical power, and reagents. The bulk of the reagent costs are associated with cyanide leaching.

 

Wear parts and maintenance allocations were calculated as a ratio of the value of purchased equipment (inclusive of transportation to the site), applied annually to project the cost of replacing mechanical equipment due to normal wear and tear.

 

The annual cost of grinding media for the SAG and ball mill was estimated using the ore abrasion index, the expected media consumption (g/kWh), and the cost per tonne of steel media. The unit cost of media ($/t steel media) was established using a quotation from a reputable supplier.

 

Oxygen (required to assist leaching) is produced on-site by oxygen generation equipment. Other process reagents will be delivered from North America and China, and other parts of the world in bulk containers with appropriate on-site unloading and storage facilities.

 

An annual operating cost of $51.6M has been estimated (assuming 4 Mtpa throughput). The costs cover all plant operations from the ROM receiving and primary crushing through to doré truck loading and tailings filtering and transportation via conveyors. Average process plant operating costs over the project LOM are estimated to be $12.89/t of processed ore in Table 21.8. A summary of processing unit costs and their relative proportions is presented in Table 21.9.

 

Table 21.8 Process unit cost summary

 

Item Unit cost ($/t milled) Percentage of total
Reagents 6.45 50%
Wear parts and maintenance supplies 0.79 6%
Personnel costs 0.77 6%
Grinding media and liners 2.41 19%
Power costs 1.92 15%
Lesser cost components 0.56 4%
Total 12.89 100%

 

Note: Values may not sum due to rounding.

 

Costs have also been categorized either as fixed (independent of throughput) or variable (proportional to throughput).

 

amcconsultants.com306

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 21.9 Summary of estimated mill operating cost

 

Category $M per annum Total ($/t milled)
Fixed costs
Labour – salaried 1.11 0.28
Labour – hourly 1.96 0.49
Tools / equipment / safety supplies 0.13 0.03
Maintenance supplies 0.60 0.15
Assaying & general laboratory 0.10 0.03
Subtotal fixed 3.90 0.98
Variable costs
Power 7.70 1.92
Tailings Filtration consumables 0.75 0.19
Water usage 0.38 0.09
Reagents 25.79 6.45
Grinding media 6.84 1.71
Liners (Crusher + Mills) 2.80 0.70
Maintenance supplies 1.82 0.45
In-plant piping replacement 0.45 0.11
Lubricants 0.16 0.04
Misc contracts and supplies 0.25 0.06
Abnormal / miscellaneous Items 0.75 0.19
Subtotal variable 47.67 11.92
Total 51.57 12.89

 

Source: Halyard Inc.

 

The management team size, operations and maintenance personnel headcounts per area were developed for a 12,000 tpd process plant, with a 33.4% burden applied to gross earnings (base + bonuses) to derive the total labor costs. The personnel costs incorporate requirements for plant management, metallurgy, operations, maintenance, site services, and a contractor allowance. Salaries and benefits guidelines were provided by New Pacific via their HR plan. A total of 105 employees are accounted for in the process operating costs.

 

A summary of labour requirements and costs are summarized in Table 21.10.

 

amcconsultants.com307

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 21.10 Labour details - Processing

 

  # Total US$M p.a.
Salaried positions
Management & training 4 0.37
Engineering management 5 0.34
Metallurgical / lab 5 0.39
Total salaried 14 1.11
Hourly positions
Plant operations 56 1.35
Plant maintenance 25 0.45
Sampling / analytical 10 0.16
Total hourly 91 1.96
Total salaried + hourly 105 3.06

 

Source: Halyard Inc.

 

Inputs from various equipment vendors and power calculations for smaller plant equipment assisted in the determination of average annual power requirements for processing. Total plant power consumption is estimated at 36.2 kWh per tonne processed. Power supply rates were obtained from written minutes of recent discussions between New Pacific and a Bolivian national utility company. A straight unit rate for power (i.e., no maximum demand tariff) of $53 per MWh has been used. At an annual power consumption of 145,200 MWh per annum, the annual power cost is estimated to be $7.7M.

 

A quotation for the supply (through a Chilean Port) of grinding balls for SAG and Ball mills, and testwork consumption rates were used to calculate the required quantities of each. The estimate includes agent handling and site delivery costs. This is presented in Table 21.11.

 

Table 21.11 Steel wear parts

 

  Tonnes p.a. Total US$M p.a.
Steel wear parts
Mill balls 6,380 6.84
Crusher and chute liners 364 2.80
Total   9.63

 

Source: Halyard Inc.

 

Budget quotations were obtained from suppliers for many of the process reagents, including sodium cyanide (the most significant reagent cost). Where quotations were not provided, rates from recent North American Projects were used. The estimate includes agent handling and site delivery costs.

 

amcconsultants.com308

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 21.12Consumable details - Processing

 

  Tonnes p.a. Total $M p.a.
Reagents
Lime 5,200 1.81
Flocculant 320 1.95
Sodium Cyanide 6,200 14.88
Zinc Powder 655 3.63
Lead Nitrate 164 0.73
NaOH 300 0.26
H2SO4 40 0.02
H2O2 40 0.17
Fluxes 180 0.32
Anti-Scalant 40 0.21
Diatomaceous Earth 1,200 1.80
Total 14,339 25.79

 

Source: Halyard Inc.

 

Water used by the process facilities is assumed to be supplied at an average cost of $0.40 per m3. Plant makeup water volume is estimated to be 0.88 Mm3 per annum.

 

21.2.2.2Tailings Storage Facility operating cost

 

An estimate of operating costs for the TSF described in Section 18 was generated by NewFields Canada Mining & Environment ULC. The estimate was developed from first principles, using performance data from heavy equipment supplier specifications. Labour costs were provided by New Pacific Metals.

 

The operating cost breakdown includes equipment, personnel and fuel costs. Transportation of tailings by conveyor from the process plant to the TSF are included in the processing costs developed by Halyard.

 

An annual operating cost of $3.0M has been estimated (assuming 4.0 Mtpa throughput). The costs are summarized in Table 21.13. Wear parts and maintenance allocations are included within the hourly operating costs for the equipment, which is included in the costs below.

 

Table 21.13 TSF operating costs

 

Item $M per annum Total ($/m3 of tailings)
Filtered tailings – placement & compaction 2.2 0.81
Surface water management – collection & pumping 0.3 0.10
ARD collection & treatment 0.5 0.20
Total 3.0 1.11

 

21.2.3General and administrative costs

 

The following general and administrative (G&A costs) were prepared by New Pacific for the Silver Sand Project.

 

·Ongoing land compensation costs for the community
·An allowance for ongoing permitting and technical studies
·General support personnel for site security, operating the warehouse, and general site support

 

amcconsultants.com309

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

·Software
·Insurance for mine operations
·General management and supervision
·Travel costs for FIFO personnel
·Camp operating costs for FIFO personnel

 

A summary of G&A costs is presented in Table 21.14. G&A costs incurred during the pre-production period have been capitalized as part of site development costs. G&A costs for year 1 and onwards are considered to be operating costs.

 

Table 21.14 G&A costs

 

G&A cost Annual cost ($M)
Ongoing land compensation 1.0
Allowance for ongoing permitting & studies 0.1
General support personnel 1.5
Software 0.3
Mine operations insurance 1.0
General management & supervision1 0.3
Travel costs 0.5
Camp costs 1.5
Total 6.1

 

Note: Values may not sum due to rounding.

1General management & supervision costs escalate each year according to labour cost escalations.

 

21.2.4Product selling costs

 

The Silver Sand Project is planned to produce silver doré on site. Halyard provided estimates for product payability rates product transportation, product insurance, and refining charges. New Pacific provided royalty selling costs for royalties due to the Bolivian government and the Bolivian Mining Corporation (COMIBOL). Royalties are calculated on gross revenue. The royalty to COMIBOL only applies to gross revenue from silver mined outside the AMC limit. Selling costs are summarized in Table 21.15.

 

Table 21.15 Product selling costs

 

Selling cost item Value Units
Payable silver 99.50% of Ag produced
Transportation & insurance costs 0.25 US$/Oz
Refining charges 0.20 US$/Oz
Royalty to COMIBOL (outside the AMC limit) 6.00% of gross revenue
Royalty to the Bolivian Government 6.00% of gross revenue

 

amcconsultants.com310

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

21.2.5Operating cost summary

 

The operating cost for the Silver Sand Project is summarized by the following items in Table 21.16.

 

·Mining operating cost
·Processing and tailings storage operating cost
·G&A costs
·Product transportation and insurance costs
·Doré refining costs
·Royalty to the Bolivian Mining Corporation
·Royalty to the Bolivian government

 

amcconsultants.com311

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 21.16Operating cost by year

 

Production Schedule Units Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Material mined Mt 205.9 16.1 14.8 14.3 14.5 17.4 17.0 17.5 18.0 17.6 18.0 16.3 16.3 8.0 -
Material moved Mt 215.6 18.6 14.8 14.9 15.2 17.8 17.5 18.2 18.0 17.7 19.3 18.0 16.3 8.9 0.3
Material processed Mt 52.0 3.7 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.3
Payable silver produced Moz. 157.1 15.8 16.5 15.6 11.6 11.5 11.3 10.7 12.3 10.6 9.3 9.7 12.6 9.0 0.4
Operating costs
Mining US$M 482.5 36.6 32.6 32.8 34.3 39.5 40.5 40.6 41.6 40.3 44.1 39.7 38.0 21.4 0.3
Processing & tailings US$M 713.0 51.1 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 7.5
G&A US$M 85.6 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 5.8
Product transportation &
insurance
US$M 39.3 3.9 4.1 3.9 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.7 3.1 2.6 2.3 2.4 3.2 2.3 0.1
Refining costs US$M 31.4 3.2 3.3 3.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.5 2.1 1.9 1.9 2.5 1.8 0.1
Royalty to the Bolivian Mining Corporation (COMIBOL) US$M 16.1 2.4 - 2.0 0.2 0.1 0.2 3.2 4.6 2.3 0.1 0.2 - 0.8 0.0
Royalty to the Bolivian Government US$M 226.2 22.7 23.8 22.4 16.7 16.6 16.3 15.5 17.7 15.2 13.4 14.0 18.2 13.0 0.5
Total operating cost US$M 1,594.1 126.0 124.5 124.9 117.1 122.1 122.8 124.8 130.1 123.3 122.6 119.0 122.6 100.0 14.4

 

Note: Values may not sum due to rounding.

 

amcconsultants.com312

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

21.3Capital costs

 

21.3.1Infrastructure

 

The project capital cost estimate for the surface infrastructure is based upon quoted cost estimates from a Bolivian national utility company, and quotes from various earthworks contractors, building suppliers, and QP experience regarding unit rates.

 

The project capital cost estimate for surface infrastructure, including surface ancillary equipment, is $50.7M, and is summarized in Table 21.17. The major components of this cost estimate are grid power, local electrical distribution, site access roads, and camp construction. Other items include an on-site office and maintenance workshop. Water for the mine site and processing plant will be supplied from the water dam reservoir to be constructed using waste material from the pit. Infrastructure costs include an average contingency of 15%.

 

Table 21.17 Surface infrastructure project capital cost estimate

 

Description Total cost ($M)
Power to site and one mine site substation 16.64
Access roads and upgrading 8.19
Site prep and excavations for foundations 2.13
Stockpile site preparation 3.50
Camp 1.90
Electrical distribution, communications, yard lighting 7.70
Critical spares 2.30
Explosives magazine 0.50
Warehouse, light vehicle shop, tools, and lube oil 2.20
Fuel storage 0.24
Indirect costs including EPCM 5.40
Total 50.70

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

Costs detailed in Table 21.25 include $47.0M of initial project capital costs and $3.7M of sustaining capital costs. Sustaining capital costs were estimated to be 1% per year of direct infrastructure costs. Sustaining capital costs include rebuilds, repairs, and replacements of site infrastructure (and associated equipment).

 

21.3.2Mine development

 

Mine development capital costs consist of:

 

·Pit development including mine road construction, and clearing land for the pit and waste storage facility
·Capitalized pre-production mining (waste stripping)
·Dewatering

 

Land clearing costs were estimated to cost $0.60/m2, in addition to a 15% contingency cost and a 15% contractor markup. Land clearing costs were based on quotes from similar studies within AMC Consultants internal database. Land clearing costs were timed on an as-needed basis to allocate capital appropriately. Pre-production mining was planned to provide fill material for site earthworks and to open access to the ore body. The cost of pre-production mining was estimated based on the first-principles operating costs prepared by the QP for the mine production schedule.

 

amcconsultants.com313

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The QP has relied on hydrogeological consultants HydroTechnica Ltd. to estimate mine dewatering costs. Sump pumping costs are treated as a capital cost item and the cost of establishing free-draining boreholes was treated as an operating cost because they’ll have to be established on an ongoing basis and they will be excavated as mining progresses.

 

A summary of mine development costs is presented in Table 21.18.

 

Table 21.18 Mine development capital costs.

 

Mine development CAPEX item Initial CAPEX ($M) Sustaining CAPEX ($M) Total ($M)
Pit development land clearing 4.2 0.4 4.6
Land clearing for the waste storage facility 0.3 - 0.3
Dewatering 0.5 0.1 0.5
Capitalized pre-production mining 71.2 - 71.2
Total 76.1 0.5 76.6

 

Note: Values may not sum due to rounding.

 

Procurement of a mining fleet is not included in the capital cost estimate since this will be a contract mining operation, with contractor-supplied equipment. New Pacific has conveyed to the QP that a fleet mobilization fee will be charged to New Pacific upon commissioning the fleet on-site, and this mobilization fee will be credited back to New Pacific against ongoing operating costs charged by the contractor. This will be credited over the first few months of operations.

 

21.3.3Process plant

 

An estimate of capital cost for the 4 Mtpa process plant described in Section 17 was generated by Andy Holloway of Halyard Inc. The estimate was built up by plant area and by engineering discipline using appropriate estimating methodology. The engineering work completed for this study is preliminary, but it provides the level of detail necessary to enable the bottom-up estimation of costs to AACE Class 4 standards.

 

21.3.3.1Basis of estimate

 

The capital cost for process plant facilities includes the supply to site, construction, and installation of all structures, utilities, materials, and equipment, as well as all associated indirect and management costs. It encompasses contractor and engineering support to commission the process plant and ensure all systems are operational. At the point of handover of the plant to the client, all operational costs, including ramp-up to full production, are considered operating costs. The capital cost estimate is based on a 24-month base case development schedule, starting with the receipt of the necessary Bolivian regulatory construction permits.

 

The estimate describes the base case operating scenario, includes all process areas and ancillary buildings of the plant, and encompasses:

 

·Direct costs including construction and commissioning of all structures, utilities, and equipment
·Indirect costs associated with design, construction and commissioning
·Provisions for contingency

 

amcconsultants.com314

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Cost estimates are expressed in Q2 2024 US dollars with no allowances for escalation, currency fluctuation or interest during construction. Costs quoted in foreign currencies were converted to US dollars at the following exchange rates:

 

·1.36 Canadian dollars
·0.65 Australian dollars
·1.08 Euros

 

The following references were used as support for the capital estimate:

 

·Overall site plan and layout drawings for each process area.
·Process flow diagrams (PFDs).
·Material take-offs per area.
·Equipment datasheets.
·Equipment list per area.
·Mass and water balance for the plant.
·Consumables consumption calculations.
·Single line diagrams.
·Electrical load list.
·MCC, transformers, and switchgear specifications.
·Written budgetary quotations from vendors, based on equipment specifications from Halyard.
·Halyard’s internal project cost database.

 

No fixed / firm quotations were used to prepare this estimate. For larger equipment items, multiple budgetary quotations were generally requested from vendors, whereas for smaller items, single quotations or database costs were used. Greater than 85% of the mechanical equipment supply budget is derived from budget quotations.

 

The process plant will be located mostly outdoors. However, a brick/steel building to enclose the high-security areas (Merrill Crowe and the furnace / refinery) has been included in the capital estimate and the cost for this includes the building shell, HVAC, and electrical.

 

21.3.3.2Direct costs

 

The estimates for mechanical and electrical equipment capital expenditures are based on various data sources, including budget quotations from well-established equipment vendors in China and North America, and cost databases from similar recent projects. The process team prepared a mechanical equipment list by area, containing information on ratings, power, size, and weight. Requests for quotations, which included equipment datasheets, were issued to vendors to obtain budgetary proposals for major equipment items, including large platework items such as leach tanks.

 

Budgets for other platework items were estimated by calculating weights and fabricators’ unit rates from recent projects.

 

Equipment installation man-hours were derived based on Halyard’s installation man-hour norms. These norms are North American unit work hours and thus considered ideal working conditions, which were then adjusted using a productivity factor to account for conditions at the project site. Wage rates for equipment installation crews were established based on discussions with local contractors in Bolivia.

 

amcconsultants.com315

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

These productivity factors were incorporated into the labour unit work hours as multipliers on the base man-hours. Estimates for contractors’ construction equipment are included in the direct costs.

 

The QP relied upon Halyard’s civil engineering team to derive preliminary material take-offs (MTOs) based on the mechanical layouts of the plant areas. MTOs contain calculated quantities of concrete, structural steel, rebar, earthwork, and architectural elements by area. Halyard’s procurement team engaged Bolivian construction companies to obtain “all-inclusive” supply and install (erection) rates in the form of formal proposals. The estimating team used MTO quantities and supplied rates to estimate the civil, structural, earthwork, and architectural costs for each area of the plant.

 

Budgets for pipework, electrical bulk items, and general instrumentation items were estimated using plant area-specific factors from other similar gold/silver projects. The budgets include transportation to the site, which is either factored (for North American supply) or based on budget quotations (for containerized and bulk shipping to the site from Shanghai, PRC).

 

21.3.3.3Indirect costs

 

Indirect costs are accounted for using quoted, calculated, and factored values. Construction contractor site costs were described in quotations from multiple Bolivian contractors based on the provided scope of work and engineering deliverables. These indirect costs include mobilization and demobilization, mobile equipment costs, consumables, accommodation, food and transport for workers, management and supervision, and miscellaneous items.

 

Vendor commissioning services costs were calculated based on obtained formal proposals. The plant’s first fill expenditures were calculated based on required reagent and grinding media quantities and proposals from suppliers. EPCM (Engineering, Procurement, and Construction Management), consultants and spare parts inventory costs were factored.

 

Transportation costs for each piece of equipment are adjusted based on recent quotes from other projects.

 

Contingency has been applied based on a joint risk assessment discussion between Halyard and the client, which involved defining the level of contingency per engineering discipline. Established contingency factors were then applied to the direct costs of each discipline.

 

No allowances were made within the direct cost estimate to cover for material wastage, weather delays, rework and claims and extras.

 

The process plant capital cost estimate is $209.4M, which includes $148.5M direct capital, $36.1M of indirect capital and $24.8M of contingency. A high-level breakdown of plant area capital is given in Table 21.19.

 

Table 21.19 Mill area capital estimate

 

Description Total cost ($M)
Direct capital 148.49
Indirect capital 36.11
Contingency 24.75
Total 209.35

 

Source: Halyard Inc.

 

amcconsultants.com316

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The $148.5M direct capital budget is broken down by plant area in Table 21.20. The direct capital budget includes the estimated cost of civil and earthworks, the supply, delivery to the site, and installation of mechanical equipment, structural steel, platework, piping, and electrical / instrumentation items. It also includes any buildings and mobile equipment items (plant trucks, mobile crane, forklift, skid-steer, etc.).

 

Table 21.20 Process plant direct capital breakdown by area

 

Plant area Total cost ($M)
Site preparation 13.5
Crushing 4.9
Coarse ore storage 2.4
Grinding (SAG, ball & pebble crushing) 24.3
Pre-leach thickener 4.2
Leaching 32.1
CCD 15.0
Merrill Crowe 11.5
Refinery 4.5
Tailings (dewatering and overland conveyors) 12.9
Reagents 6.5
Services 8.6
Refinery building & laboratory 0.5
Transportation 6.9
Mobile equipment 0.7
Total 148.5

 

Source: Halyard Inc.

 

The same budget is broken down by engineering discipline in Table 21.21.

 

Table 21.21Process Plant direct capital breakdown by discipline

 

Discipline Total cost ($M)
Civil and earthworks 33.6
Mechanical equipment 42.6
Structural steel 17.4
Platework 19.8
Piping 8.3
Electrical and instrumentation 19.2
Misc (buildings / architectural / transport) 7.6
Total 148.5

 

Source: Halyard Inc.

 

21.3.4Tailings Storage Facility

 

An estimate of capital cost for the waste storage facility described in Section 18 was generated by NewFields Canada Mining & Environment ULC.

 

amcconsultants.com317

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

21.3.4.1Basis of estimate

 

The capital cost for the TSF includes the processing, placement and compaction of fill materials required for the liner for the tailings disposal area, as well as supply to site and installation of the geomembrane liner materials. The costs associated with the bulk rockfill for construction of the perimeter containment berms are included in the mining costs as fill materials will be transported directly from the open pit mining operation. The capital cost estimate is based on a 24-month base case development schedule, starting with the receipt of the necessary Bolivian regulatory construction permits.

 

The capital cost estimate includes:

 

·Direct costs including construction of the liner and required transition and bedding zones in the containment berms
·Indirect costs associated with design and construction
·Provisions for contingency

 

Cost estimates are expressed in Q2 2024 US dollars with no allowances for escalation, currency fluctuation, or interest during construction.

 

The following references were used as support for the capital estimate:

 

·Layout drawings for the TSF
·Material take-offs
·NewFields’ internal project cost database

 

No fixed / firm quotations were used to prepare this estimate.

 

21.3.4.2Direct costs

 

The estimates for construction are based on budgetary quotations for liner supply, construction equipment supplier performance specifications, and internal databases for liner installation production rates. Costs for bulk fill for the containment embankments are excluded as they have been accounted for as part of the mining costs. Wage rates for construction crews were provided by New Pacific.

 

Preliminary MTOs based on the layout of the TSF and typical cross-sections for the perimeter embankments. Estimates of site stripping and preparation were developed based on experience in similar settings. A summary of direct capital costs for the TSF are summarized in Table 21.22.

 

Table 21.22TSF direct capital costs

 

TSF capital costs Total cost (US$M) Initial capital costs Sustaining capital costs
TSF earthworks 3.3 1.3 2.0
TSF geosynthetics 4.3 3.2 1.2
Stormwater management 0.2 0.1 0.1
TSF Instrumentation 0.1 0.1 -
Water treatment plant 5.0 - 5.0
Subtotal – Direct costs 12.9 4.7 8.2

 

amcconsultants.com318

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

21.3.4.3Indirect & other capital costs

 

Indirect costs are accounted for using the following factors applied to direct costs:

 

·Engineering – 8%
·Construction management – 7%
·Quality assurance and quality control – 5%
·Third-part surveying – 3%

 

No allowances were made within the direct cost estimate for material wastage, weather delays, rework, claims, and extras. A contingency of 15% of direct and indirect costs was applied. New Pacific also included an allowance of US$1.00/tonne of tailings produced as part of sustaining capital costs, based on operating data from similar TSF facilities, to account for costs for tailings raises and compaction. A summary of indirect, contingency, and construction allowance costs are presented in Table 21.23.

 

Table 21.23 Indirect & other capital costs for the TSF

 

Tailings Storage Facility capital costs Total cost (US$M) Initial capital costs Sustaining capital costs
Indirect construction costs 3.0 1.1 1.9
Contingency costs 2.4 0.9 1.5
Dam raises and material compaction costs 52.0 - 52.0
Subtotal - Other costs 57.4 2.0 55.4

 

21.3.5Owner’s capital costs

 

Costs related to the water reservoir, community compensation, and project permitting have been treated as owner’s costs. New Pacific has estimated costs in the project budget for the following items related to the local community:

 

·Community projects
·Relocating the community cemetery
·Land compensation

 

New Pacific has also made an allowance for additional support for project permitting. Costs for the above items have been estimated by New Pacific.

 

New Fields has prepared an estimate for construction costs for the water reservoir dam. This estimate excludes the cost of mining and hauling fill material to the dam site, which is included in the project’s budget as capitalized pre-production mining cost.

 

21.3.5.1Water dam

 

An estimate of capital cost for the water dam as described in Section 18 was generated by NewFields Canada Mining & Environment ULC.

 

The capital cost for the water dam includes the processing, placement, and compaction of fill materials required for the liner for the dam, as well as supply to the site and installation of the geomembrane liner materials. The costs associated with the bulk rockfill for the construction of the water dam are included in the mining costs as fill materials will be transported directly from the open pit mining operation. The capital cost estimate is based on a 24-month base case development schedule, starting with the receipt of the necessary Bolivian regulatory construction permits.

 

amcconsultants.com319

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The estimate includes the base case scenario and encompasses:

 

·Direct costs including construction of the liner and required transition and bedding zones in the containment berms.
·Indirect costs associated with design and construction.
·Provisions for contingency.

 

Cost estimates are expressed in Q2 2024 US dollars with no allowances for escalation, currency fluctuation, or interest during construction.

 

The following references were used as support for the capital estimate:

 

·Layout drawings for the water dam
·Material take-offs
·NewFields’ internal project cost database

 

No fixed / firm quotations were used to prepare this estimate.

 

The estimates for construction are based on budgetary quotations for liner supply, construction equipment supplier performance specifications and internal databases for liner installation production rates. Costs for bulk fill for the containment embankments are excluded as they have been accounted for in the mining costs. Wage rates for construction crews were provided by New Pacific.

 

Preliminary MTOs based on the layout of the water dam facility and typical cross-sections for the embankment. Estimates of site stripping and preparation were developed based on experience in similar settings. Indirect costs are accounted for using factored values, in the same manner as the TSF (Section 21.3.4.3).

 

No allowances were made within the direct cost estimate to cover for material wastage, weather delays, rework and claims, and extras.

 

The water dam capital cost estimate is $3.9M, which includes $2.8M of direct capital, $0.6M of indirect capital and $0.5M of contingency. A high-level breakdown of plant area capital is given in Table 21.24.

 

Table 21.24 Water dam capital costs

 

Water dam capital costs Total cost (US$M)
Direct costs
Water dam earthworks 1.6
Water dam geosynthetics 1.0
Water dam instrumentation 0.1
Stormwater management 0.1
Subtotal - Direct costs 2.8
Other costs
Indirect construction costs 0.6
Contingency costs 0.5
Subtotal - Other costs 1.1
Total 3.9

 

amcconsultants.com320

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

21.3.5.2Other owner’s costs

 

Costs related to the following items have been included as part of the owner’s capital costs.

 

·An allowance for community projects
·Cemetery relocation costs
·An allowance for additional project permitting
·Land compensation payments to the community
·Capitalized operating costs for project development
·Mine closure and rehabilitation

 

The QP has reviewed the cost estimates and determined them to be reasonable at the PFS stage. A 15% contingency cost has been included. Community engagement and consultation is an ongoing process. As such, these costs have been kept confidential.

 

The owner’s sustaining capital costs also include closure and post-closure monitoring. A detailed closure and reclamation plan has not been conducted for the Silver Sand Project. The QP has assumed reclamation costs of $10 million.

 

This cost was split over two years immediately following final production (years 14 and 15 of the production schedule). AMC Consultants also assumed post-closure monitoring & maintenance costs of $250k/year for five years following final production (years 14-18). A 15% contractor markup and 15% contingency were applied to closure and reclamation costs. The total closure and reclamation cost was estimated to be $14.9M. Bolivian environmental consultants engaged by New Pacific have communicated to New Pacific that they are not required to post a reclamation bond or other financial security before commencing site development.

 

21.4Capital cost summary

 

Capital costs for initial project construction and development are planned to be expended over a two-year pre-production period. This period covers years -2 and -1 in the project schedule. The pre-production period includes the following activities:

 

·Building haul roads to connect working areas
·Pre-production mining, to provide rock fill and construct ore stockpiles
·Earthworks and construction of site infrastructure such as:
¾Mineral processing plant
¾Stockpiles platforms
¾Main substation and electrical infrastructure
¾Mobile equipment maintenance shop
¾Communications network
¾Explosives magazine
¾Fuel depot
¾On-site camp
·TSF site clearing and construction
·Waste rock storage site clearing
·Constructing the water reservoir dam
·Installing a dewatering system

 

amcconsultants.com321

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

New Pacific has also made allowances during the pre-production period for community related costs pertaining to:

 

·Community projects
·Relocating a cemetery
·Land compensation to affected stakeholders
·Additional studies and project permitting

 

A summary of initial and sustaining capital costs is presented in Table 21.25.

 

Table 21.25     Capital cost summary

 

Capital cost item (US$M) Total cost Initial capital costs Sustaining capital costs
Infrastructure 50.7 47.0 3.7
Mine development 76.6 76.1 0.5
Processing plant 209.4 207.3 2.0
Tailings Storage Facility 70.3 6.7 63.6
Owner's capital costs 21.2 21.2 0.0
Closure costs 14.9 0.0 14.9
Total 443.0 358.3 84.7

 

amcconsultants.com322

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

22Economic analysis

 

An economic model was developed to estimate annual cash flows and sensitivities of the Silver Sand project. Pre-tax estimates of project values were prepared for comparative purposes, while post-tax estimates were developed in conjunction with New Pacific, and are likely to approximate the true investment value.

 

22.1Assumptions

 

All currency is in US$ unless otherwise stated. The cost estimate was prepared with a base date of Year -2 and does not include any escalation beyond this date. For net present value (NPV) estimation, all costs and revenues are discounted at 5% from the second half of Year -2 (1 July). The economic model shows the Project under construction for two years (Year -2 and Year -1), which is considered the development phase which is followed by the production phase for the balance of the projected cash flows, which is considered operating (Years 1 to 14). The mine closure phase of the project is from Years 15 to 18.

 

A regular Bolivian corporate income tax rate of 25% is applied. As a mining property, the Project is subject to an additional tax of 12.5%, with a 5% reduction for companies that produce pure metal products (as is the case with the Silver Sand project producing silver doré onsite). A tax schedule was prepared for corporate income tax based on information provided by New Pacific. No tax credits have been applied.

 

No tax planning has been applied for corporate income tax, all historical tax attributes such as any loss carry forwards, recapture, mineral property, exploration costs or net tax basis of capital assets are ignored. Taxes are paid in the year they are incurred.

 

The project’s economics were assessed to determine if the Bolivian Mining Surtax (Surtax) would be applicable. The Surtax policy applies an additional 25% corporate income tax when extraordinary profits are generated from mining within Bolivia. Based on the economic parameters defined in this technical report, a Surtax liability will not be incurred at the assumed silver selling price of $24.00/oz. A Surtax payment may be due if the project’s economics change. The Surtax assessment was conducted by AMC Consultants and New Pacific. It is based on information provided in the memo titled “Analysis of the Bolivian Mining Surtax effective application” (8 August 2023) by PPO Legal & Tax (New Pacific’s taxation experts in Bolivia).

 

Initial capital expended in Year -2 and Year -1 for developing the project was depreciated at fixed rates per year. Capital costs were depreciated to reduce taxable profit in year 1, and onwards. The rates of depreciation listed in Table 22.1 were provided by New Pacific, based on information provided by local tax experts.

 

Table 22.1 Depreciation rates

 

Item Rate of depreciation
Pre-production mining 33.3%
Owner’s capital costs 33.3%
Mine development costs (land clearing) 33.3%
Mineral processing capital costs 12.5%
Tailings storage facility capital costs 20.0%
G&A costs* 7.1%
Infrastructure capital costs 10.0%

 

*G&A costs were assumed to be depreciated evenly over the LOM.

Source: PPO Legal & Tax Offices, 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com323

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Sustaining capital costs were depreciated proportionally to the remaining life of the project because they are ongoing costs. The allowance for unforeseen construction challenges related to the TSF (discussed in Section 21.3.4.3) was completely depreciated in a given year due to the unforeseen nature of these costs. Operating costs were counted against taxable profit each year to calculate income tax.

 

The estimates of capital and operating costs have been developed specifically for this project and are summarized in Section 21 of this report. The economic analysis has been run with no inflation (constant dollar basis).

 

Project revenue is derived from the sale of silver doré. A metal price of $24.00/Troy Oz. was selected after discussion with New Pacific and referencing current markets and forecasts in the public domain. The selling costs for silver doré are summarized in Table 22.2. The selling costs and payability rate are based on information provided by New Pacific and Halyard.

 

Table 22.2 Selling costs

 

Selling cost item Value Units
Payable Silver 99.50% of Ag produced
Transportation & Insurance Costs 0.25 US$/Oz
Refining Charges 0.20 US$/Oz
Royalty to COMIBOL (outside the AMC limit) 6.00% of gross revenue
Royalty to the Bolivian Government 6.00% of gross revenue

 

Source: New Pacific Metals Corp. and Halyard Inc., 2024.

 

A 6.00% royalty on gross revenue is applied to all silver doré produced. An additional 6.00% royalty is paid to the Bolivian Mining Corporation (COMIBOL) for silver produced from ore mined outside of the AMC area (i.e. silver produced in the MPC area).

 

A discount rate of 5.0% per year was applied for the project. Discount rates applied to projected cash flows also recognize the time value of money as well the risks and variables associated with the project, such as metal price fluctuation, marketability of the commodity, location of the project, stage of development, and experience of the owner.

 

It is assumed that silver doré produced each year is considered sold in the same period with no inventories of work-in-process or finished goods.

 

22.2Economic Analysis

 

A high-level economic assessment of the proposed open pit operation of the Silver Sand deposit was conducted. The project is projected to generate a pre-tax NPV of $1,135M and a post-tax NPV of $740M at a discount rate of 5% per year, with a pre-tax IRR of 50% and post-tax IRR of 37%.

 

Initial project capital is estimated at $358M with a payback period of 1.9 years (measured on a post-tax basis from the beginning of production, after construction is completed). Key assumptions and results of the economics are provided in Table 22.3. The LOM production schedule, average metal grades, recovered metal, and cash flow forecast are shown in Table 22.4. Pre-tax and post-tax cashflow graphs are presented in Figure 22.1 and Figure 22.2.

 

amcconsultants.com324

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 22.3 Silver Sand deposit – Key economic input assumptions and cost summary

 

Item Unit Value
Total process feed material kt 52,014
Total waste mined kt 181,878
Pre-production waste mined kt 24,261
Production waste mined kt 157,617
Silver feed grade g/t 105
Silver processing recovery rate % 90.00%
Silver selling price $/oz 24.00
Discount rate % 5%
Silver payability rate % 99.50%
Payable silver metal Moz 157
Gross revenue $M 3,770
Product selling costs & royalties $M 313
Total net revenue $M 3,457
Total capital costs $M 443
Initial capital costs $M 358
Sustaining capital costs $M 85
Total operating costs1 $M 1,281
Mine operating costs1 $M 482
Process and tailings storage operating costs1 $M 713
General and administrative operating costs1 $M 86
Operating cash cost1 (excl. selling costs) $/oz Ag payable 8.16
Pre-tax all in sustaining cost2 $/oz Ag payable 10.69
Pre-tax payback period3 Yrs 1.4
Post-tax payback period3 Yrs 1.9
Pre-tax NPV5% $M 1,135
Pre-tax IRR % 50%
Post-tax NPV5% $M 740
Post-tax IRR % 37%

 

Notes:

Values may not sum due to rounding.

1.Does not include capitalized operating costs
2.Does not include site development (initial) capital costs.
3.The payback period is measured from the beginning of production, after construction is completed.
Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com325

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Table 22.4 Annual Silver Sand Project production and cashflow forecast

 

Item / parameter Unit Total -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Total ore mined Mt 52 2 2 3 5 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 2 5 3          
Total waste mined Mt 182 9 15 13 10 10 11 14 13 14 14 14 15 14 11 5          
Total plant feed Mt 52     4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4          
Silver feed grade g/t 105     147 144 135 101 100 98 93 107 92 81 85 110 78 43        
Silver recovery % 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Gross revenue $M 3,770     378 397 374 279 277 272 258 295 254 224 234 303 217 9        
Selling costs $M 313     32 31 31 22 22 22 24 28 22 18 19 24 18 1        
Silver payability rate % 99.5 99.5 99.5 99.5 99.5 99.5 99.5 99.5 99.5 99.5 99.5 99.5 99.5 99.5 99.5 99.5 99.5 99.5 99.5 99.5 99.5
Payable Silver produced Moz 157     16 17 16 12 12 11 11 12 11 9 10 13 9          
Total net revenue $M 3,457     346 365 342 257 255 251 234 267 232 206 215 280 199 8        
Mining $M 482     37 33 33 34 40 41 41 42 40 44 40 38 21          
Processing & Tailings $M 713 51 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 8
G&A $M 86 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Total operating cost $M 1,281     94 93 93 95 100 101 101 102 101 105 100 99 82 14        
Initial capital $M 358 160 199

 

10

 

8

 

5

 

5

 

6

 

4

 

4

 

5

 

4

 

4

 

5

 

4

 

4

 

7

 

7

     
Sustaining capital $M 85
Total capital cost $M 443 160 199 10 8 5 5 6 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 7 7 0.3 0.3 0.3
Undiscounted cash flows (pre-tax) $M 1,733 -160 -199 242 264 244 157 149 145 129 160 126 97 110 177 112 -13 -7      
Undiscounted cash flows (post-tax) $M 1,162 -160 -199 181 197 184 117 111 109 97 118 87 68 75 120 77 -13 -7
Discounted cash flows (pre-tax) $M 1,135 -156 -185 215 223 196 120 109 101 85 100 76 55 60 91 55 -6 -3
Discounted cash flows (post-tax) $M 740 -156 -185 160 166 148 89 81 75 64 74 52 39 41 62 38 -6 -3

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com326

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 22.1 Pre-tax project cashflow

 

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com327

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 22.2 Post-tax project cashflow

 

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com328

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

22.3Sensitivity analyses

 

A sensitivity analysis was performed for variations in capital costs and operating costs to determine their relative importance as project value drivers. The sensitivity analysis examined the impact on post-tax NPV (at a discount rate of 5% per year) and IRR by varying the following input items by +/-10 to +/-20%.

 

·Mine operating cost
·Process operating cost
·LOM capital costs

 

The results of the cost sensitivity analysis are summarized in Table 22.5.

 

Table 22.5 Sensitivity analysis by input cost

 

  Cost sensitivity - NPV US$ M / IRR (%)
Sensitivity input items -20% -10% 0% +10% +20%
Base Case
Mine operating cost 784 / 38% 762 / 37% 740 / 37% 719 / 36% 697 / 36%
Process operating cost 803 / 39% 773 / 38% 740 / 37% 708 / 36% 676 / 35%
Life-of-Mine CAPEX 797 / 46% 770 / 41% 740 / 37% 711 / 33% 682 / 30%

 

Note: This table presents NPV / IRR by varying the input sensitivity items. For example, if LOM CAPEX changes by +20%, while other costs remain the same as the “Base Case”, the NPV becomes $682 M and IRR is 30%. NPV values are discounted at a rate of 5% per annum.

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

An additional sensitivity analysis was conducted for the silver metal price and the discount rate. The change in NPV and IRR is presented in Table 22.6 and Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

An additional sensitivity analysis was conducted for the silver metal price and the discount rate. The change in NPV and IRR is presented in Table 22.6 and Figure 22.3.

 

Table 22.6 Sensitivity analysis of silver prices and discount rates

 

  Silver price (US$/Troy Oz.)
$18.00 $21.00 $24.00 $27.00 $30.00

 

 

 

Discount rate

5.0% 329 / 22% 535 / 30% 740 / 37% 936 / 43% 1,124 / 48%
6.5% 277 / 22% 463 / 30% 649 / 37% 825 / 43% 994 / 48%
8.0% 232 / 22% 401 / 30% 569 / 37% 729 / 43% 882 / 48%
9.5% 192 / 22% 346 / 30% 500 / 37% 645 / 43% 783 / 48%
11.0% 157 / 22% 298 / 30% 438 / 37% 571 / 43% 697 / 48%

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

amcconsultants.com329

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Figure 22.3 Sensitivity analysis of silver prices and discount rates graph

 

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024.

 

The results of the sensitivity analysis show that the post-tax NPV is robust and remains positive for the range of sensitivities evaluated. The post-tax NPV is most sensitive to changes in the silver price and the discount rate. The NPV is moderately sensitive to changes in the capital cost and changes in operating cost.

 

amcconsultants.com330

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

23Adjacent properties

 

COMIBOL, the state-owned Bolivian Mining Corporation, holds the exploration and mining rights of the adjacent areas surrounding the concessions owned by New Pacific. New Pacific acquired the exploration and mining rights of the direct neighbouring 57 km2 area around its concessions through an MPC (see Section 4.2) with COMIBOL, except for a few operating mines which are subleased to small operators by COMIBOL.

 

The Colavi mine to the north-west and the Canutillos mine to the west of the Property are two adjacent operating mines.

 

23.1Colavi Tin Polymetallic mine

 

The host rock in the Colavi mine area consists of Ordovician shale and sandstone, and Cretaceous sandstone and dacitic tuffs. Some dacitic intrusive rocks are found in Ordovician and Cretaceous sequences as stocks, sills, or dykes. Six manto-type mineralized horizons with thicknesses ranging from 0.8 to 1 m were concordantly developed in a horizon of calcareous sandstone within the Cretaceous red sandstone and tuffs sequence. The mineralized calcareous sandstone gently dips to the west and occupies an area of 2 km wide and 6 km long. Ore minerals are mainly composed of pyrite, hematite, and cassiterite. Sphalerite and galena are very rare, and quartz is absent. Volcanism and mineralization are closely related. Manto mineralization formed first associated with earlier magmatic intrusions, and dacite sills successively intruded the Cretaceous sedimentary sequence and displaced the manto-type mineralization. Later cassiterite veins occur in dacite (Rivas 1979; Sugaki et al., 1983).

 

Mining activities for tin at Colavi can be traced back to 1890. In 1912, the recorded production capacity of the mine was 100 tons per day and produced up to 5,000 tons of ore grading more than 3% Sn (Redwood, 2018). Production of the Colavi mine in June 1981 was 5,700 t ore grading 0.7% Sn. Mine workers hand-picked and screened the crude ore to produce 650 to 1,000 t semi-concentrate containing 2 – 3% Sn, per month (Sugaki et al., 1983).

 

The United Nations Development Program (UNDP) and Servicio Geologico de Bolivia (GEOBOL) jointly carried out a reconnaissance exploration for tin and silver at Colavi in 1989 and 1990 and estimated a potential resource of 3 to 5 million tons grading 0.5 to 0.9% Sn over a 4 km strike length (Redwood, 2018). The QP has been unable to verify the reported resource and the resource is not indicative of the mineralization on the Property that is the subject of the Technical Report.

 

23.2Canutillos Tin Polymetallic mine

 

Limited literature on Canutillos shows that COMIBOL began operation at the mine in 1964 and Empresa Minera Tirex Ltda began to conduct silver heap leach in 2010 (Redwood, 2018). No exploration and production data are available from public sources.

 

amcconsultants.com331

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

24Other relevant data and information

 

The QPs are not aware of any additional information or explanation that is necessary to make the Technical Report understandable and not misleading.

 

amcconsultants.com332

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

25Interpretation and conclusions

 

25.1General and geology

 

Indicative financial results indicate that the Silver Sand Project has attractive economics and should be progressed to the next stage of study. The results of the economic evaluation estimate approximately $1,135M pre-tax NPV and $740M post-tax NPV at a 5% discount rate, pre-tax IRR of 50% and post-tax IRR of 37%.

 

Silver mineralization at the Property occurs in ten areas: Silver Sand, El Fuerte, Snake Hole, North Plain, San Antonio, Esperanza, Jisas, El Bronce, Mascota, and Aullagas. The mineralization identified in the Property belongs to the Bolivian polymetallic vein-type deposits represented by the giant Cerro Rico de Potosí silver mine in Potosí.

 

Logging, mapping, sampling, and analyzing procedures of New Pacific’s on-going exploration programs follow common industry practice. Results of QA/QC programs are deemed acceptable by the QP.

 

The Silver Sand deposit is defined by exploration drilling and has a conceptual pit constrained Mineral Resource using a 30 g/t Ag cut-off of Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources of 54.26 million tonnes grading 116 g/t silver. Dinara Nussipakynova, P.Geo. of BBA (formerly employed with AMC Consultants) takes responsibility for these estimates.

 

The deposit as currently defined remains open for expansion and there has been no modern district-scale exploration. While it is understood that engineering work for the feasibility study will be based on the current block model, there are some recommendations for future exploration. Some drilling pre-production may be required and this may take the form of grade control drilling and that has not been quantified at this stage.

 

25.2Metallurgy and processing

 

25.2.1General

 

The metallurgical work described within Section 13 was completed by several accredited North American laboratories with the specific aim of supporting a pre-feasibility study and builds upon the earlier work completed over a 2-year period at SGS Lima, Peru.

 

The underlying process approach, having been established during the PEA, continues to be whole ore leaching with sodium cyanide followed by silver reduction using zinc dust (Merrill Crowe) and smelting / refining. For this reason, the PFS testwork focused on cyanidation (in tanks and using heap leach methods) but also included comminution testwork, gravity concentration, mineralogical analysis and various characterization tests. The entire PFS work program was completed under the close supervision of Dr. Jinxing Ji, on behalf of New Pacific, and was subsequently reviewed by the QP.

 

The PFS testwork was carried out on several composite samples of mineralization that were selected to represent the established geometallurgical units and to provide a degree of spatial variability. Additional work was completed on blended composites (blends of sulphide, oxide and transitional) in order to establish the metallurgical response of typical production blends. The work on blended composites was predictable and forms the basis for the metallurgical projections used in the PFS.

 

The work completed within the updated metallurgical program has progressed understanding of the metallurgical behaviour of mineralization from the Silver Sand Project.

 

amcconsultants.com333

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The metallurgical efficiency with which a mineral processing plant might recover metal into a saleable product can have a significant impact on the potential for economic extraction. The mineral resource estimate used a constrained pit shell calculation that included a 90% metallurgical recovery assumption for silver, and this is considered appropriate and reasonable by the QP given the test work results presented in this section. Attention should be given to the fact that the metallurgical programs discussed below are still somewhat preliminary in nature and are therefore limited in their ability to represent the full extent of the deposit. Future metallurgical programs are planned however, and it is expected that these will further de-risk the project in this area.

 

25.2.2Composite characterization

 

After consideration of the updated resource estimate and mine plans, the range of silver grades tested in PFS work programs (described in Section 13) are considered by the QP to be a good representation of average run of mine head grades. Sufficient work was completed to gain insight into the likely variation in metallurgical response resulting from different head grades and geometallurgical unit blends.

 

25.2.3Comminution

 

The database of comminution information for the Project is still somewhat preliminary, although data has been relatively consistent so far. The latest SAG Mill amenability results indicate an average or medium hardness, whereas finer testing gives Bond Work Index values of 14.5 kWh/t to 16.4 kWh/t. More comprehensive comminution testing, especially at the coarser sizes, is planned for future programs.

 

25.2.4Gravity concentration

 

The impact of gravity concentration ahead of cyanidation was preliminarily tested as part of the PFS metallurgical program. The results of this work suggest that a gravity circuit can be configured to recover approximately 5% of the densest material in the cyclone overflow, and that this material can subsequently be reground to a fine size (approximately 80% -15 µm). If this reground product is then re-inserted into the cyanidation circuit for leaching, then the cyanidation characteristics of the product appear to be enhanced, and this results in a higher overall recovery of silver.

 

Despite these encouraging initial results, gravity concentration was not included in the PFS base case, as testwork is still considered preliminary in nature. The additional preproduction capital required to include this element of the flowsheet would be approximately $15M.

 

Further gravity testwork is considered necessary before the gravity process can be incorporated into the overall flowsheet.

 

25.2.5Silver deportment

 

Although stated to be semi-quantitative in nature, the silver deportment data derived from the SGS Lakefield TIMA-X mineralogy program (2022) is still quite useful as it highlights significant differences that help to explain metallurgical behaviour.

 

The following points were noted in the PEA:

 

·Silver within the Oxide and Transition units is found almost entirely within Argentite / Chloroargyrite whereas these minerals carry only half the silver within the sulphide unit.
·The high concentration of silver (~80%) within these minerals helps with the generation of high-grade flotation concentrates, as seen in the Oxide Master Composite locked cycle test.

 

amcconsultants.com334

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

·Approximately one third of the silver found within the sulphide unit is in tetrahedrite. As this mineral tends to be richer in copper and antimony than silver, then one should expect significant concentrations of these elements in flotation products from the sulphide unit.
·The sulphosalts carry a minority of silver in each unit, ranging from 2.3% in the oxide composite to 12.7% in the sulphide composite. These minerals float well in a sulphide flotation environment and are also amenable to cyanide leaching.

 

Subsequent mineralogical work for the PFS examined individual geometallurgical units with XRD (semi-quantitative) and the production composites with QEMScan (quantitative). Silver deportment data continues to identify silver-copper sulphide minerals, acanthite and silver halide minerals as the main carriers of this paymetal. Copper is found in chalcopyrite and other cyanide soluble sulphides.

 

In general, all major silver-bearing minerals are amenable to cyanidation, assuming adequate liberation is achieved.

 

25.2.6Cyanidation

 

25.2.6.1Bottle rolling

 

A new program of bottle roll testing allowed further study of the amenability of tank leaching with cyanide. Composites samples were tested under a range of conditions including variable grind, leaching time, cyanide concentration, dissolved oxygen concentration, and lead nitrate addition. Bottle rolls equipped with internal lifter bars (for additional agitation) gave good results compared to those tests conducted without lifters.

 

Leach kinetics were noted to be rather slow, which is quite typical for cyanidation of silver minerals. 72 hour leaching in a 2.0 gpL sodium cyanide solution appears to be necessary to achieve the desired extraction rates.

 

The best leaching results are achieved with high dissolved oxygen levels. For this reason, the injection of oxygen with high-energy spargers into some of the early leaching tanks is a feature of the flowsheet.

 

Copper is present in most samples at Silver Sand, and the copper minerals are often partially soluble in cyanide solutions. Dissolution of copper is approximately 50% on average and this is responsible for a significant proportion of the cyanide consumption. The copper can either be rejected in the zinc precipitation process, or recovered to precipitate, depending on the temperature of feed solutions. If copper is recovered to the silver precipitate, it can be selectively removed using acidic atmospheric oxidative leaching followed by copper precipitation. Whilst this represents additional complexity in the flowsheet, the scale is small, and the circuit prevents a buildup of copper in process water and the increase of cyanide consumption.

 

25.2.7Process flowsheet

 

The process flowsheet selected for this PFS represents a very conventional approach and is similar to those practiced by nearby Bolivian operations.

 

Key elements of the flowsheet include primary crushing with a single jaw crusher, grinding to 75 µm with a SAG mill and ball mill combination, pre-leach thickening, cyanidation in 15 large agitated and oxygenated / aerated tanks, solid-liquid separation using CCD thickeners, and silver precipitation and recovery in a standard Merrill Crowe type refinery.

 

amcconsultants.com335

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The cyanidation circuit is currently quite large compared to typical gold leaching circuits – a result of the slower leaching kinetics typically seen with silver compared to gold. Initial designs used Chinese equipment and platework, but fabrication / shipping challenges were reported by vendors to limit the practical size of leach tanks to about 17 m diameter and 18.7 m high. This results in a larger leach circuit footprint and higher civil costs. Subsequent optimization work has considered the use of larger tanks (22 m diameter x 23 m high) and agitators supplied from North American fabricators. Although this was too late for incorporation into the PFS, an optimized smaller footprint design will be considered in subsequent studies. This represents an opportunity for capital optimization.

 

The incorporation of continuous gravity equipment into the grinding circuit is considered to be another opportunity as initial testwork has shown that fine grinding of gravity concentrates has the potential to improve the overall circuit extraction rates. Again, this has been excluded from the PFS flowsheet but is earmarked for additional testwork and potential incorporation into future flowsheet designs.

 

25.2.8Metallurgical predictions

 

Analysis of metallurgical results and PFS mine plan data has determined that a simple fixed recovery model is adequate for the financial analysis of the project. Several more complex models were tested with similar outcomes.

 

For the PFS, a fixed recovery of 90% Ag has been used, based on a Y1-7 mill feed composition of 11% Oxide, 66% Transitional, and 21% sulphide. 3% of the mine plan material was reported as “unknown ID”.

 

25.3Mining and infrastructure

 

The Silver Sand open pit is split into two areas by the Machacamarca Creek. The ultimate pit is split into eight sub-phases. The ultimate pit is approximately 2,300 m long, 350 – 700 m wide, and has a maximum depth of 280 m.

 

Slope angles used for pit designs are steep and reflect the good condition of the surrounding rock but will require appropriate wall control blasting and mining practices to ensure that walls can be maintained at the proposed angles. It is recommended to develop a weathering horizon model and collect additional geotechnical data as per Section 16.3.4 to increase the geotechnical model reliability. Geotechnical slope design criteria should be updated when further information is available and pit slope stability should be assessed under static and seismic conditions.

 

The open pit is proposed to be mined using a conventional truck and excavator mining method using 72 t payload trucks and 115 t excavators. Ore and waste will be mined on 10 m benches, with waste mined in two 5 m flitches, and ore mined in three 3.3 m flitches per bench. The open pit is planned to be a contractor-run operation with a contractor-provided mining fleet.

 

The mine production schedule requires an average fleet size of 35 haul trucks and 5 loading units. The required fleet varies according to production requirements. At peak production in year 10, the mine requires 43 haul trucks and 6 loading units to fulfill production requirements. Staffing levels fluctuate based on the mining schedule and equipment requirements, with a peak of 283 staff required for the open pit in year 10 of operations.

 

Waste material is planned to be used as fill for earthworks for infrastructure, such as the water dam and TSF embankment.

 

amcconsultants.com336

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Waste material not used to support construction has been scheduled to be stored in the Valley Dump immediately west of the pit, and the main waste dump (WD1), which is south of the processing plant. Two in-pit dumps have also been designed in the main pit to provide flexibility and cost savings for waste placement.

 

The open pits contain approximately 52.0 Mt of ore with an average grade of 105 g/t Ag, and 181.9 Mt of waste material, with an overall waste-to-mineralized material strip ratio of 3.50 to 1 (including pre-production mining). The open pit operation includes two years of pre-production mining (starting in Year -2) and 13 years of production.

 

The production plan is based on delivering 4.0 Mtpa of ore to the processing plant. The mine plan includes a stockpiling strategy with low-grade, mid-grade, and high-grade ore stockpiles that will be used to maximize silver production in the early years of the project. A maximum stockpile size of 4.4 Mt of ore is required. The total annual ex-pit material mined peaks at 18.0 Mtpa, before dropping to 8.0 Mtpa at the end of the open pit mine life.

 

A rockfill water dam with an upstream geomembrane liner will be built upstream from the mine. The reservoir developed behind the dam will have a maximum capacity of about 3.0 million cubic metres. The reservoir will provide water for the mineral processing plant and mining camp and could supply downstream residents for farming and daily life water requirements if required.

 

The processing plant will produce filtered tailings that will be stored in a valley adjacent to the plant. Filtered tailings will be conveyed to the storage facility and deposited using a radial stacker spread using tracked dozers. Tailings will be stored behind a fully lined rock-fill embankment. The embankment will be constructed using waste rock provided from the open pit. Diversion ditches will be constructed around the TSF to re-route non-contact water. Seepage and run-off from the TSF will be collected in a pond which will be located downstream of the facility. Water from this pond will be pumped back to the processing plant to be re-used for mineral processing.

 

There is currently no significant infrastructure on site aside from access roads. New Pacific has undertaken discussions with the power authorities in Bolivia to arrange for access to grid power. A water supply can be secured with the construction of a small dam across the Machacamarca Creek to create a reservoir to supply the mill and local community.

 

There is a 54 km long road made up of a 27 km stretch of the paved Bolivia National Highway 5 and an all-season gravel road built for mining in the Colavi District. The gravel road is currently being widened and upgraded to paved road by the government.

 

The infrastructure has been costed at a suitable level of accuracy for this type of study. The mine will have a small on-site camp to house select management personnel. All other staff are planned to be housed in nearby communities.

 

Risks and opportunities relating to this project are discussed below.

 

25.4Risks

 

·Mineral reserves are based on modifying factors applied to the mineral resource. Deviation from the modifying factors will change the mineral reserve. Until mineral reserves are mined and processed, the quantity of mineralization and grades must be considered as estimates only.
·Portions of the Silver Sand deposit have been mined intermittently since the 16th century. Activities conducted by artisanal miners are not well documented, so it is not possible to quantify the extent of deposit depletion. Depletion is believed to be a minor risk to the project’s economics.

 

amcconsultants.com337

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

·Mining risks include greater-than-expected dilution and ore loss. Greater dilution can have a severe impact on project economics. The mine must ensure adequate drilling and blasting practices, and ore control processes, are implemented to minimize dilution from wall rock and other low-grade mineralized zones.
·Other mining risks and control measures identified included a large number of typical mining risks such as heavy vehicle interaction with light vehicles and personnel, haul ramp failure, pit wall failure, excessive ore dilution, and waste dump failure. Controls to be implemented to mitigate these risks include development of a traffic management plan, targeted geotechnical drilling and investigation, development of a ground control management plan, surface water study, grade control drilling, and design of facilities to the required codes and standards.
·Historical buildings exist on small portions of the Silver Sand deposit, south of the Machacamarca creek. This is a risk that requires further investigation and reflect in the Historical Buildings Management Plan.
·Opposition to the project from the community is seen as a risk to the timely and successful execution of the project.
·The government of the current President, elected at the end of 2020, supports and encourages private and foreign investments in the economic sectors of the country. New laws were approved by congress to encourage private investments in the mining sector, for example, Law 1391 (Supreme Decree 4579, 2021) to waive value-added tax for the import of equipment and vehicles.
·Although the country is generally friendly to private and foreign investments in mining sector, risks associated with government instability caused by political polarization and visible divisions in the governing party are noteworthy. For instance, Bolivia experienced a failed coup d’etat led by the military on 26 June 2024. (Ramos, 2024). Additionally, local protests and blockages by various social groups may pose unforeseen instability from time to time. Bolivia has experienced intermittent periods of socioeconomic and political instability that can lead to social unrest and economic uncertainty.
·The amount of time required for site development and construction will significantly influence the value of the project. Delays during the construction period pose a significant risk to the project’s economics.
·Potential for formation of Acid Rock Drainage is not well understood. Testing indicates that most waste rock has the potential to generate Acid Rock Drainage, but testing to evaluate the time to acidification and the extent of Acid Rock Drainage has not been completed.
·The Bolivian government provides significant subsidies to lower the cost of diesel fuel, at a high fiscal cost to the government. The removal or reduction of the fuel subsidy would adversely impact the economics of the Silver Sand Project. Escalations to the operating costs have been evaluated under the sensitivities presented in Section 22.
·Should Silver Sand not be able to get access to grid power, diesel power generation must be considered, though this is considered low risk.
·The water dam is upstream from the pit. Should there be a breach of the dam, the pit could potentially flood.
·Metallurgical testwork has characterized a growing set of composite samples that have been compiled using lengths of half and quarter core from resource drilling. The sample set is judged to be adequate for the PFS, but more work should be completed to enrich the data set with more variability analysis (silver / copper grade, deposit location etc.) as this will allow a more complete analysis of economic drivers such as silver recovery and cyanide consumption. Certain areas of the reserve may be found to provide lower recoveries or higher cyanide consumptions than the average values estimated for the PFS.

 

amcconsultants.com338

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

·The process flowsheet selected for the Project is straightforward, uses commonly available mineral processing equipment and is in many ways similar to established silver operations in the region. However, the leaching of silver is slow (compared to gold), and the negative influence of copper on cyanide consumption and potentially also silver recovery should not be underestimated. Further testwork will focus on the characterization of these effects, in addition to other development work.
·The filtration of tailings at 4 Mtpa rate is a significant undertaking that requires several large pressure filters to be in operation simultaneously. The buildup of ultra fines within the filter media can, over time, blind filtration media which reduce the availability of this critical equipment and causes production bottlenecks. The PFS process designs have made some allowance for this potential issue, and further testwork should examine the phenomenon to ensure that design contingencies are adequate.

 

25.5Opportunities

 

·Three potential satellite pit locations have been identified to the north and east of the main pit. These satellite pits were evaluated at a high level at a silver price of US$23.00/Troy Oz. These pits had marginal value and could be included in the mine plan at higher silver prices.
·Longer term, there is potential for expansion and upgrading of the Silver Sand deposit through additional drilling.
·Work to identify alternative dump locations with short hauls to provide flexibility and costs savings for waste placement. One potential area identified is the Machacamarca Creek gully adjacent to the main pit.
·Revisions to the TSF configuration could potentially reduce the volume of fill (waste) material required for constructing the embankment. A lower waste mining requirement in the early years of the project would reduce the mine development capital costs and would allow for a more flexible mining sequence, that may be able to extract more additional-grade ore in the early years of production.
·Geotechnical and hydrogeological investigations have not been completed in the area of the proposed waste and tailings storage facilities. Identification of suitable low-permeability surficial soils could preclude the requirement for the inclusion of a geomembrane liner over the base of the tailings storage facility.
·Several areas of the process plant flowsheet are open to improvement, as testwork and engineering is developed. Opportunities such as the use of fewer (larger) leaching tanks for a smaller footprint. The development of gravity concentration and regrind milling, particularly for sulphide-rich areas of the deposit, have shown the potential to significantly improve silver recovery.
·Many areas of the Silver Sand deposit include concentrations of copper. The copper can be a complication for cyanidation circuits as it tends to consume cyanide. For Silver Sand, the process flowsheet allows for the removal of copper, thereby avoiding buildup of this element to more challenging levels. Production of a copper-rich byproduct represents an opportunity to increase revenues slightly, although current metal prices may not support this option.
·New Pacific should retain a tax specialist for the FS to investigate the possibility of including tax credits (i.e. royalty tax credit) and income tax planning measures, to further improve project value.
·The presence of traceable gold in the ore feed, measured at approximately 0.02 g/t, presents an opportunity to enhance the economic outcomes of the project. While the primary focus remains on silver production, the recovery of even small quantities of gold can contribute positively to the overall project economics.

 

amcconsultants.com339

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

26Recommendations

 

26.1Introduction

 

The main recommendation is to advance the Silver Sand project to a feasibility study level. This will require advancing the definition and engineering level of all of the mining, processing, and infrastructural aspects.

 

26.2Quality Assurance / Quality Control

 

There are a number of recommendations on all facets of QA/QC summarized below. These are expanded on in Section 11.

 

·Purchase an additional CRM at the average grade of the deposit which has been certified using similar digestion methodology.
·Investigate performance issues with CRMs CDN-ME-1603 and CDN-ME-1605 if these are to be used in future programs.
·If the ME-MS41 analytical method continues to be used going forward it is recommended that the OG46 over-limit threshold be dropped from 100 g/t Ag to a level below the anticipated COG.
·Continue to include blanks in every batch of samples submitted at a rate of at least 1 in every 20 samples (5%) and consistently monitor them in real time on a batch-by-batch basis and that remedial action is taken as issues arise.
·Ensure that all blank sample follow up is recorded.
·Implement investigative work to understand geological variance.
·Ensure that all future programs include 4 - 5% duplicate samples including field duplicates, coarse (crush) duplicates, and pulp duplicates to enable the various stages of sub-sampling to be monitored.
·In future programs, submit umpire duplicates, as was done for the October 2017 – 2019 programs.
·Submit pulp samples (rather than coarse reject) so that umpire samples only monitor analytical accuracy and variance.
·Include CRMs at the average grade and higher grades in umpire sample submissions.

 

26.3Mineral Resource

 

For future Mineral Resource modelling, the following should be considered:

 

·At the next update of the model include all remaining drill data which missed the closing date.
·Incorporate geometallurgical attributes into the block model.
·Verify mined-out volumes by surveying historical waste dumps.
·Conduct structural analysis of available data and complete initial structural / geotechnical drilling as required.
·Update the 3D geological model to include detailed geology – deposit oxidation domaining and structures.

 

The Silver Sand deposit, as currently defined, remains open for expansion at depth. It is recommended that future drilling on the deposit should consider the following:

 

·Infill drilling to upgrade areas of high-grade mineralization within the current Inferred Resource area.
·Additional drilling around the current Mineral Resources, where the deposit remains open at depth.

 

amcconsultants.com340

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The QP also notes that there has been no modern district-scale exploration outside of Silver Sand deposit. It is recommended that additional drilling be completed at the other prospects to assess for the potential for Mineral Resources.

 

26.4Metallurgy and mineral processing

 

The PFS metallurgical program included extensive cyanide leach testing of 18 mineralized samples, and this has demonstrated that cyanide leaching is a technically viable option to recover silver for the project. The work has incrementally de-risked metallurgical aspects of the project, although opportunities for improvement are believed to remain. Further metallurgical investigations are warranted to increase silver recovery and to reduce cyanide consumption.

 

26.4.1Sample selection and characterization

 

Sampling and compositing of material for the various metallurgical programs completed over the last three years has been based on a consistent geometallurgical model that identifies material by the degree of oxidation of host rock as either Oxidized, Transitional, or Fresh (Sulphide) material. Although relatively straightforward, these models have generated a robust data set that highlights slightly different metallurgical responses.

 

Despite the different degrees of host rock oxidation, the nature of silver mineralization is less variable, and cyanide leaching behaviour is relatively consistent under the right conditions.

 

The further development of metallurgical programs is encouraged, and it is expected that these will further refine the metallurgical performance predictions – primarily silver recovery, copper recovery, and cyanide consumption rate. The completion of more extensive metallurgical sampling, characterization testing, and performance modelling is recommended as infill drilling programs continue.

 

The physical characterization of metallurgical composites has highlighted a relatively low level of variability within the deposit, and a marginal trend towards harder samples as oxidation levels increase. Accurate sizing and selection of comminution equipment requires additional data, and an extended variability program in this area is recommended as part of a feasibility program. The involvement of comminution specialists will become more important as the designs progress towards “for construction” status.

 

Additional quantitative mineralogy programs will assist in understanding silver deportment within geometallurgical zones and is recommended for inclusion in future metallurgical programs.

 

26.4.2Gravity concentration

 

Gravity concentration with the fine grinding of the resultant gravity concentrate has been demonstrated to significantly increase silver recovery for the high-grade sample from the sulphide domain. Further testing is needed to optimize the consumption of cyanide while silver recovery is being improved. Also, the testing of gravity concentration should be extended to determine the necessary gravity concentrate mass pull and the minimum regrind size. Further testing should include the joint cyanide leach where the finely reground gravity concentrate is leached together with the gravity tail.

 

26.4.3Cyanidation

 

The latest metallurgical studies have highlighted some of the sensitivities within a typical cyanidation leach circuit – such as those practiced by nearby Bolivian operations. In particular, a large capacity leaching circuit appears necessary, to provide long leach times.

 

amcconsultants.com341

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The cost of imported sodium cyanide together with the significant consumption of this key reagent is the single largest operating cost, and further work to optimize process conditions to minimize cyanide consumption is recommended.

 

As the process plant will be located at a high altitude (>4,000 m), it is important that further cyanidation test work continues to focus on leach conditions that include high dissolved oxygen (DO2) levels. The DO2 vs silver recovery relationship should be defined further to allow optimized design oxygenation equipment in the flowsheet.

 

Heap leach is not considered to be a viable option for the project at this point in time, due primarily to the expectation that day-to-day operation at a high elevation will be problematic.

 

26.4.4Process water effects

 

When process water is recycled to the grinding circuit and other circuits in the process plant, a number of phenomena occur. For instance, the recirculation of cyanide means that silver dissolution will start during grinding, and this will likely have a positive impact on silver recovery. Also, the dissolved copper cyanide complex and zinc cyanide complex will likely be able to dissolve silver. If this happens, then sodium cyanide consumption is likely to decrease. However, because of copper dissolution during the cyanide leach, the level of dissolved copper will tend to accumulate over time. Higher levels of dissolved copper in the process water may interfere with cyanide titration and the reduction of dissolved silver within the Merrill Crowe circuit.

 

If the copper in solution precipitates together with silver in the Merrill Crowe circuit, the separation between copper and silver will become necessary for the silver precipitate before smelting. Therefore, more detailed metallurgical testing is needed to study the impact of recycled process solutions.

 

26.4.5Pre-leach thickening

 

The PFS metallurgical program included thickening test work that used the detoxed cyanide leach residue slurry. As the flowsheet does not include a detoxification step then comparative thickening testing is needed for the cyanide-leached tailing without prior cyanide destruction.

 

26.4.6Optimization of Merrill Crowe

 

Silver reduction using zinc dust should be tried without the addition of lead nitrate. Also, further testing should be carried out with a lower dosage of zinc dust. The impact of the elevated level of dissolved copper on the reduction of silver needs to be fully investigated.

 

26.4.7Cyanidation methods

 

Although the use of a lifterbottle roll has been demonstrated to produce good results with respect to silver recovery and cyanide consumption, cyanide leach testing in a mechanically agitated tank should be investigated further. The tank should have an adequately sized agitator, the impeller should be properly positioned (i.e., vertically), and the depth of slurry to the tank diameter should be close to 1:1. This is particularly important since test work has demonstrated a sensitivity to these details.

 

26.4.8Oxygen intake during cyanide leach

 

Air entrainment from atmosphere into the slurry is often significant when cyanide leach is carried out in a small tank / bottle in the laboratory. However, for a large tank in commercial operation, air entrainment from atmosphere into the slurry is negligible. As a result, oxygen intake during the cyanide leaching process must be measured correctly.

 

amcconsultants.com342

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

The measured oxygen intake data will be used for final air / oxygen sparging system designs and to set sparging rates during future commercial operations.

 

26.4.9Copper removal from Merrill Crowe precipitates

 

Considering the dissolved copper may precipitate together with silver in the Merrill Crowe circuit, testing is needed to selectively dissolve copper in the presence of metallic silver while hydrogen peroxide and sulphuric acid are used. Process variables such as temperature, retention time, and hydrogen peroxide utilization need to be investigated and optimized.

 

26.4.10Preg-robbing, preg-borrowing, and instability of silver cyanide complex

 

A significant risk remains in that the preg-robbing or preg-borrowing phenomenon, which was experienced by Bureau Veritas Mineral / Metallurgy, did not occur at ALS Metallurgy in Kamloops, BC. In addition, ALS Metallurgy in Kamloops experienced issues where additional silver was generated midway through the cyanide leaching process.

 

It is thought that these issues could be related to the instability of the silver complex in cyanide solutions, the contamination of sample bottles, the carry-over of mild steel from the grinding mill (or media), and unreliable silver assay procedures. Detailed investigations are warranted in these specific areas.

 

26.5Hydrogeology and hydrology

 

It is recommended the following steps be taken to further develop an understanding of the hydrological and hydrogeological parameters impacting the Silver Sand project:

 

·Review of drillhole records and geological data for improved conceptual understanding of the shallow groundwater system.
·Sampling of the springs and wetland to the north and west of the Main Pit.
·Shallow drilling (auger or diamond drilling) to install shallow piezometers and prove the depth of the colluvial system, and whether it supports a water table upstream of the springs and within the wetland area.
·Permeability testing of the existing standpipe piezometers.
·Construction of a trial dewatering borehole in the alluvial deposits of the main river channel to investigate its hydrogeological properties and allow for a targeted dewatering strategy, if required.
·Construction of at least one trial dewatering borehole into a major fault structure and surrounding piezometer array to investigate fault properties and surrounding fracture connectivity.
·The installation of multi-level vibrating wire piezometers is recommended to improve the understanding of the hydrogeological system. The following targets are recommended:
¾At least one major and one local fault structure.
¾The shallow aquifer system in hill-slope colluvium (further to positive results from exploratory drilling).
¾The Tarapaya Formation (where saturated).
¾UH3 orthogonal to the existing standpipe piezometers for triangulation of groundwater pressure.
¾UH3 north and south of the river.

 

amcconsultants.com343

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

26.6Geotechnical

 

·It is recommended to develop a weathering horizon model and collect additional geotechnical data as per Section 16.3.4 to increase the geotechnical model reliability. Geotechnical slope design criteria should be updated when further information is available and pit slope stability should be assessed under static and seismic conditions.
·The ongoing geotechnical program should be continued to collect additional data for pit wall angle stability analysis.
·In addition, soil and weathered core samples should be collected for lab testing.

 

26.7Open pit mining

 

It is recommended that the following aspects are examined in the next study stage:

 

·It is recommended to undertake a detailed bench height and dilution study. The study should consider lateral block extents, flitch / bench heights, equipment specifications, drill and blast, mining rates, dilution and grade control strategies, and geotechnical implications. Grade control strategies, such as grade control drilling and blast movement monitoring should also be further evaluated.
·It is recommended that quotes from multiple Bolivian mining contractors are collected to firm up the mining costs estimates for the open pit operations. New Pacific is recommended to acquire binding (or “firm”) quotes for the primary mining contractor to achieve a higher level of accuracy for the FS.
·Further work should be conducted to identify alternative dump locations, i.e., in the creek gully, to reduce haul distance.
·The amount of time required for site development and construction will significantly influence the value of the project. As part of the FS, New Pacific is recommended to prepare an operational readiness assessment and create a detailed development schedule to ensure the project is fully prepared for operation.

 

26.8Infrastructure

 

·It is recommended that all technical and commercial aspects of site infrastructure are pursued to a higher level of accuracy as part of the feasibility study.
·Location and placement of accommodation camp, waste dump, crusher, and process plant be confirmed following civil geotechnical and condemnation drilling.
·Continue to negotiate with power authorities to confirm the cost estimate, and that sufficient grid capacity can be provided.
·The site requires significant earthworks to construct the supporting infrastructure. New Pacific should investigate the potential for engaging contractors who are familiar with this type of work to obtain an accurate and dependable estimate of costs.

 

26.9Tailings storage

 

·The early years of the mine production schedule are driven by silver grades and the requirement to produce waste material to be used as rock fill for the tailings storage embankment. As part of the FS, it is recommended to investigate alternative configurations for tailings storage, to reduce the volume (and cost) of waste production in the early years of the project.
·Initiate geotechnical, geological, and hydrogeological investigations to fully characterize the site conditions in the location of the proposed waste storage facility.

 

amcconsultants.com344

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

·Initiate detailed geochemical characterization program, including static and kinetic testing to fully characterize the tailings and waste rock materials to be produced from the mining and processing operations.
·Potential for formation of Acid Rock Drainage is not well understood. It is recommended to undertake testing to evaluate the time to acidification and the extent of Acid Rock Drainage of the waste rock.

 

26.10Environmental

 

·Complete the environmental baseline study, impact analysis, and mitigation plans. Permitting has to be advanced.
·New Pacific is recommended to conduct a detailed closure and reclamation plan as part of the FS.
·Environmental programs have commenced with a reasonable set of samples characterized. As the project continues to progress towards permitting and construction, a larger set of variability samples should be submitted to develop the dataset of geochemical behavior (acid- generation and metals leaching) in plant tailing streams and waste rock piles. FS level environmental test work should include static tests and kinetic (humidity cell) tests on filtered slurry samples generated by the most recent test work. These tests would not include cyanide detoxification as this process is no longer included in the process flowsheet.

 

26.11Financial inputs

 

It is recommended that New Pacific retain a tax specialist for the FS to investigate the possibility of including tax credits and income tax planning measures, to further improve project value.

 

26.12Community and social studies

 

It is recommended that community and social studies are continued and expanded to levels appropriate for the FS.

 

26.13Feasibility study

 

The above activities will be managed and collated as part of an FS report.

 

26.14Recommendation cost summary

 

The estimated costs for the recommended programs including contingency are tabulated below in Table 26.1.

 

Table 26.1Cost summary estimate for recommendations

 

Cost category Budget totals (US$)
Geometallurgical addition to the block model 30,000
Metallurgical & mineral processing test work 200,000
Geotechnical, hydrogeology, and hydrology 1,000,000
Open pit mining 250,000
Infrastructure engineering 200,000
Tailings storage 1,100,000
Environmental studies and permitting 750,000
Community & social studies and programs 500,000
Completion of FS reporting 1,000,000
Contingency – 10% 500,000
Grand total 5,530,000

 

Source: AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., 2024, with input from New Pacific, Halyard, and Newfields.

 

amcconsultants.com345

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

27References

 

Aguirre, F.B. 2019, Bufete Aguirre Soc. Civ., Mining in Bolivia: overview, Practical Law Country Q&A w-010-2113.

 

ALS Metallurgy Kamloops, Comminution Testwork on Composites from the Silver Sand Project, New Pacific Metals Corp, KM 6875, 8 February 2023.

 

ALS Metallurgy Kamloops, Pre-Feasibility Study Metallurgical Testing for the Silver Sand Project, Bolivia, New Pacific Metals Corp, KM6855, 13 July 2023.

 

ALS Metallurgy Perth, Merrill Crowe Testing, Report No. A24428, July 2023.

 

AMC Consultants, NI 43-101 Technical Report, Silver Sand Deposit Preliminary Economic Assessment, New Pacific Metals Corp, 30 November 2022.

 

AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. 2020, “Silver Sand Deposit Mineral Resource Report (Amended) for New Pacific Metals Corp Property Potosí, Bolivia”, effective date 16 January 2020, amended date 3 June 2020.

 

Arce-Burgoa, O. & Goldfarb, R. 2009, Metallogeny of Bolivia, SEG Newsletter, No.79.

 

Autonomous Municipal Government of Tacobamba. N.d. Territorial Plan for Integral Development 2016-2020.

 

Bieniawski, Z. T., 1989. Engineering Rock Mass Classification. New York: Wiley.

 

Birak, D.J. 2017, “NI 43-101 Technical Report on Silver Sand Project”, Potosí Department, Bolivia, 15 August 2017.

 

Bolivian Ministry of Environment and Water 2018, Methodology for the Identification of Environmental Impacts, p. 2.

 

Bufete Aguirre Soc. Civ. 2017, Basics of Mining Law in Bolivia, GlobalMineTM Basics of Mining Law 2017, pp. 26-41.

 

Bureau Veritas Minerals / Metallurgical, Metallurgical Testing for Silver Recovery, New Pacific Metals – Silver Sand Project, Project No. 2201508, 28 October 2022.

 

Cai, M., Kaiser, P.K., Uno, H., Tasaka, Y. and Minami, M. (2004). “Estimation of rock mass deformation modulus and strength of jointed hard rock masses using the GSI system”. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 41(1), pp. 3-19

 

Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). (14 February 2021). Appendices I, II and III.

 

Dietrich, A., Lehmann, B., & Wallianos, A. 2000, Bulk rock and melt inclusion geochemistry of Bolivian tin porphyry systems, Economic Geology, Vol. 95, 2000, pp. 313–326.

 

Holloway, Andy, Metallurgical Program, Silver Sand Project, Q4 2020 – Q2 2021, SGS Lima, Peru, July 2021.

 

amcconsultants.com346

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Itasca, PPT-682.002.03 - Preliminary Recommendation of Inter-ramp Angles for Silver Sand Open pit, May 2023.

 

Itasca, Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Study for PFS Silver Sand Project, April 2024.

 

Itasca, Hydrological, and Hydrogeological Conceptual Study – Silver Sand Project, October 2022.

 

JKTech, SMC Test Report Silver Sand, JKTech Job No 23017/P1, January 2023.

 

Kemetco Research, Cyanide Detoxification Study, Project R0703, 31 May 2023.

 

Lamb, S., Hoke, L., Kennan, L., & Dewey, J. 1997, “Cenozoic evolution of the Central Andes in Bolivia and northern Chile”, Geological Society of London, Special Publications, Vol. 121, pp. 237-264.

 

London Bullion Market Association, London PM Fix, May 2024.

 

Long, S.D., Parker, H.M., & Françis-Bongarçon, D. 1997, “Assay quality assurance quality control programme for drilling projects at the prefeasibility to feasibility report level”, Prepared by Mineral Resources Development Inc. (MRDI) August 1997.

 

Ministerio de La Presidencia, (1 September 2021). Decreto Supremo 4579. Edición: 1424NEC Gaceta Oficial del Estado plurinacional de bolivia (http://www.gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/edicions/view/1424NEC).

 

Ministry of Environment and Water, (2009). Red Book of Vertebrate Wildlife of Bolivia. National Institute of Statistics (INE) (2012). National Population and Housing Census 2012.

 

National Institute of Statistics (INE). (2013). Agricultural Census 2013.

 

New Pacific Metals Corp 2017, News Release, 10 April 2017.

 

New Pacific Metals Corp (2018). Final Report: Socioeconomic Baseline, Risk Analysis and Community Engagement Recommendations for New Pacific Metals Corp – Silver Sands Project in the Department of Potosí-Bolivia.

 

P.C.A Ingenieros Consultores S.A. – DISEÑO PRELIMINAR “PRESA MACHACAMARCA”, INFORME FINAL, March 2023.

 

PPO Legal & Tax (8 August 2023). Analysis of the Bolivian Mining Surtax effective application.

 

Plurinational State of Bolivia. (1997). Supreme Decree No. 24,782 the Environmental Regulations for Mining Activities, Bolivia.

 

Plurinational State of Bolivia. (2009). Constitution of Bolivia.

 

Plurinational State of Bolivia. (21 December 2010). Law No. 71 - Law of Rights of Mother Earth.

 

Plurinational State of Bolivia. (15 October 2021). Law 300, Framework Law of Mother Earth and Integral Development for Living Well.

 

Plurinational State of Bolivia. (23 May 2014). Law No. 535, Bolivian Cultural Heritage Law.

 

amcconsultants.com347

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Plurinational State of Bolivia. (28 May 2014). Law No. 535, the Mining and Metallurgy Law.

 

Plurinational State of Bolivia. (27 April 1992). Law No. 1333, Environmental Law.

 

Plurinational State of Bolivia. (8 December 1995). Supreme Decree No. 24,176 - Regulation of the Environmental Law. Regulations for activities with dangerous substances.

 

Pratt, W. & Francis-Smith, B. (2018). Structural Control on Mineralization at Silver Sands, Bolivia. Technical Report.

 

Pocock Industrial, Flocculant Screening, Gravity Sedimentation, Slurry Rheology and Pressure Filtration, PI2404, May 2023.

 

Ramos, D. (2024a, June 27). Bolivia coup attempt fails after military assault on Presidential Palace | Reuters. Reuters (https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/bolivias-president-slams-irregular- mobilization-army-units-2024-06-26/).

 

Read, J. & Stacey, P., 2009. Guildelines for Open Pit Slope Design. s.l.:CSIRO PUBLISHING.

 

Redwood, S.D. 2018, New Pacific Internal Report, A review on the Silver Sand Project, Potosí, Bolivia, 27 December 2018.

 

Rivas, S. 1979, Geology of the principal tin deposits of Bolivia. Geological Society of Malaysia, Bulletin 11, December 1979, pp. 161-180.

 

Ruijin Jiang, Andy Holloway and Alex Zhang, NI 43-101 Technical Report, Silver Sand Project, Potosí, Bolivia, 31 August 2019.

 

SGS Burnaby, TML Report Analysis, report reference 0000025992, 31 May 2023.

 

SGS Lakefield, An Investigation into Mineralogical Characterization of Three Silver Feed Samples from Bolivia, Project 18131-01, 27 August 2020.

 

SGS Lima, Metallurgical Report for New Pacific Metals Corp, August 2019.

 

SGS Lima, Metallurgical Tests Service by Cyanide Leaching for the Assessment of Silver Minerals, Project Silver Sand – Phase I, Project# Cz. MET 0285-2018 MIN, May 2019.

 

SGS Lima, Metallurgical Tests Services of Comminution, Floating and Leaching for the Evaluation of Silver Ores, Silver Sand Project, Project# Cz. MET 0169-2020 MIN, July 2021.

 

Sugaki, A., Ueno, H., Kitakaze, A., Hayashi, K., Shimada, N., Kusachi, I., & Sanjines, O. 1983, “Geological study on the polymetallic ore deposits in the Potosí district, Bolivia”, The Science Reports of the Tohoku University, Series III, Vol. XV, No. 3.

 

U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in 1971, map no. 78499 1971, available from the website of The University of Texas at Austin (https://legacy.lib.utexas.edu/maps/bolivia.html).

 

World Population Review. (2024). Potosí Population. Retrieved 19 July 2024 from worldpopulationreview.com/world-cities/potosi-population.

 

World Population Review. (2024). Sucre Population. Retrieved 19 July 2024 from https://worldpopulationreview.com/world-cities/sucre-population.

 

amcconsultants.com348

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

28QP Certificates

 

CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR

 

I, Eugene Tucker, P.Eng., of Vancouver, British Columbia, do hereby certify that:

 

1I am currently employed as a Principal Mining Engineer and Regional Manager - Canada with AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. (EGBC #1002350), with an office at Suite 202, 200 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 1S4.

2This certificate applies to the technical report titled “Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study”, with an effective date of 19 June 2024, (the “Technical Report”) prepared for New Pacific Metals Corp. (“the Issuer”) in respect of the Issuer’s Silver Sand property (the “Property”).

3I am a graduate of the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada (Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering in 1996 and Master of Engineering in 1999). I am a registered member in good standing with Engineers and Geoscientists British Columbia (License #30131) and Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta (License #60027). I have worked as a Mining Engineer for a total of 25 years and have relevant experience in open pit mining of gold, base metals and coal, design and planning, mine production and financial evaluation, reserve estimation, technical reviews, feasibility and pre-feasibility studies, project and construction management, contracts management and cost estimation.

I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a “qualified person” for the purposes of NI 43-101.

4I have not visited the Property.

5I am responsible for Sections 2-6, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26 and part of 1 of the Technical Report.

6I am independent of the Issuer and any related companies as described in Section 1.5 of the NI 43-101;

7I have not had prior involvement with the property that is the subject of the Technical Report;

8I have read NI 43-101, and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with NI 43- 101 and Form 43-101F1.

9As of the effective date of the Technical Report and the date of this certificate, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, this Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

 

Effective Date: 19 June 2024

Signing Date: 6 August 2024

 

Original signed and sealed by

Eugene Tucker, P.Eng.

Regional Manager – Canada / Principal Mining Engineer

AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd.

 

amcconsultants.com349

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR

 

I, Dinara Nussipakynova, P.Geo., of North Vancouver, British Columbia, do hereby certify that:

 

1I am currently employed as a Principal Geologist with BBA Engineering Ltd., with an office at 1050 West Pender Street, Suite 800, Vancouver, British Columbia V6E 3S7.

2This certificate applies to the Technical Report titled “Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study”, with an effective date of 19 June 2024 (the “Technical Report”), prepared for New Pacific Metals Corp. (“the Issuer”).

3I am a graduate of Kazakh National Polytechnic University (Bachelor of Science and Master of Science in Geology in 1987). I am a member in good standing of the Association of Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia (Registration #37412) and the Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario (Registration #1298). I have practiced my profession continuously since 1987 and have been involved in mineral exploration and mine geology for a total of 35 years since my graduation from university. My experience is principally in Mineral Resource estimation, database management, and geological interpretation.

I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a “qualified person” for the purposes of NI 43-101.

4I visited the Property from 28 - 29 May 2022 for 2 days.

5I am responsible for Sections 7 - 12, 14 and parts of 1, 25, 26, and 27 of the Technical Report.

6I am independent of the Issuer and related companies applying all of the tests in Section 1.5 of the NI 43-101.

7I have had prior involvement with the Property in that I was a qualified person for previous AMC Technical Report in 2020 (dated 25 May 2020, amended and restated on 3 June 2020 with an effective date of 16 January 2020), as well as the AMC Technical Report in 2022 (effective date of 30 November 2022).

8I have read NI 43-101 and the sections of the Technical Report for which I am responsible have been prepared in compliance with NI 43-101.

9As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the sections of the Technical Report for which I am responsible contain all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

 

Effective Date: 19 June 2024

Signing Date: 1 August 2024

 

Original signed and sealed by

Dinara Nussipakynova, P.Geo.

Principal Geologist

BBA Engineering Ltd.

 

amcconsultants.com350

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR

 

I, Andrew Holloway, P.Eng., do hereby certify that:

 

1I am currently employed as Process Director with Halyard Inc., with an office at 212 King St. West, Suite 501, Toronto, Ontario M5H 1K5.

2This certificate applies to the Technical Report titled “Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study”, with an effective date of 19 June 2024 (the “Technical Report”), prepared for New Pacific Metals Corp. (“the Issuer”) in respect of the Issuer’s Silver Sand property (the “Property”).

3I graduated from the University of Newcastle upon Tyne, England, B.Eng. (Hons) Metallurgy, 1989. I am a registered member in good standing of the Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario (Membership #100082475). I have practiced my profession in the mining industry continuously since graduation.

My relevant experience with respect to process plant engineering, precious metals metallurgy and metals marketing includes 34 years’ experience in the mining sector, working for operating mining companies, engineering companies and mining consultancies.

I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a “qualified person” for the purposes of NI 43-101.

4I visited the Property from 14 - 16 January 2020.

5I am responsible for Sections 13, 17, 19 and parts of 1, 21, 25, 26, and 27 of the Technical Report.

6I am independent of the Issuer and related companies applying all of the tests in Section 1.5 of the NI 43-101.

7I have had prior involvement with the Property in that I was a qualified person for the previous AMC Preliminary Economic Assessment Report on the Silver Sand Property in 2022 (date 30 November 2022).

8I have read NI 43-101 and the sections of the Technical Report for which I am responsible have been prepared in compliance with NI 43-101.

9As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the sections of the Technical Report for which I am responsible contain all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

 

Effective Date: 19 June 2024

Signing Date: 1 August 2024

 

Original signed and sealed by

Andrew Holloway, P.Eng.

Process Director

Halyard Inc.

 

amcconsultants.com351

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR

 

I, Wayne Rogers, P.Eng., of Vancouver, British Columbia, do hereby certify that:

 

1I am currently employed as a Principal Mining Engineer and Open Pit Manager with AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. (EGBC #1002350), with an office at Suite 202, 200 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 1S4.

2This certificate applies to the Technical Report titled “Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study”, with an effective date of 19 June 2024, (the “Technical Report”), prepared for New Pacific Metals Corp. (“the Issuer”) in respect of the Issuer’s Silver Sand property (the “Property”).

3I am a graduate of the University of Western Australia in Perth, Australia (Bachelor of Mining Engineering in 2005) and the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia (Master of Philosophy (MPhil) in Mining Engineering in 2014). I am a member in good standing of the Engineers and Geoscientists British Columbia (Registration #49953). I have worked as a Mining Engineer for a total of 19 years since my graduation from university and have relevant experience in project management, feasibility studies, and technical report preparations for mining projects. My expertise includes strategic and tactical mine planning, mine design, mine optimization, feasibility studies, and drill and blast.

I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a “qualified person” for the purposes of NI 43-101.

4I visited the Property from 4-5 May 2023 for 2 days.

5I am responsible for Sections 15, 16, 22 and parts of 1, 21, 25, 26, and 27 of the Technical Report.

6I am independent of the Issuer and related companies applying all of the tests in Section 1.5 of the NI 43-101.

7I have had prior involvement with the Property in that I was a qualified person for the AMC Technical Report in 2022 (effective date of 30 November 2022).

8I have read NI 43-101 and the sections of the Technical Report for which I am responsible have been prepared in compliance with NI 43-101.

9As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the sections of the Technical Report for which I am responsible contain all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

 

Effective Date: 19 June 2024

Signing Date: 31 July 2024

 

Original signed and sealed by

Wayne Rogers, P.Eng.

Open Pit Manager / Principal Mining Engineer

AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd.

 

amcconsultants.com352

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR

 

I, Mo Molavi, P.Eng., of Vancouver, British Columbia, do hereby certify that:

 

1I am currently employed as a Director / Mining Services Manager / Principal Mining Engineer with AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. (EGBC #1002350), with an office at Suite 202, 200 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 1S4.

2This certificate applies to the Technical Report titled “Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study”, with an effective date of 19 June 2024 (the “Technical Report”), prepared for New Pacific Metals Corp. (“the Issuer”) in respect of the Issuer’s Silver Sand property (the “Property”).

3I am a graduate from Laurentian University in Sudbury, Canada (Bachelor of Engineering in 1979) and McGill University of Montreal, Canada (Master of Engineering in Rock Mechanics and Mining Methods in 1987). I am a registered member in good standing of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Saskatchewan (License #5646), the Engineers and Geoscientists British Columbia (Registration #37594), and a Member of the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum. I have worked as a Mining Engineer for a total of 45 years since my graduation from university and have relevant experience in project management, feasibility studies, and technical report preparations for mining projects.

I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a “qualified person” for the purposes of NI 43-101.

4I have not visited the Property.

5I am responsible for parts of Sections 1, 18, 25, and 26 of the Technical Report.

6I am independent of the Issuer and related companies applying all of the tests in Section 1.5 of the NI 43-101.

7I have had prior involvement with the Property in that I was a qualified person for the AMC Technical Report in 2022 (effective date of 30 November 2022).

8I have read NI 43-101 and the sections of the Technical Report for which I am responsible have been prepared in compliance with NI 43-101.

9As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the sections of the Technical Report for which I am responsible contain all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

 

Effective Date: 19 June 2024

Signing Date: 31 July 2024

 

Original signed and sealed by

Mo Molavi, P.Eng.

Director / Mining Services Manager / Principal Mining Engineer

AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd.

 

amcconsultants.com353

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR

 

I, Leon Botham, P.Eng., of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, do hereby certify that:

 

1I am currently employed as a Principal Engineer with NewFields Canada Mining & Environment ULC, with an office at 640 Broadway Avenue, Suite 204, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 1A9.

2This certificate applies to the Technical Report titled “Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study”, with an effective date of 19 June 2024 (the “Technical Report”), prepared for New Pacific Metals Corp. (“the Issuer”) in respect of the Issuer’s Silver Sand property (the “Property”).

3I am a graduate of the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon, Canada (B.E. Civil Engineering in 1988) and Purdue University in Indiana, United States (MSCE Civil/Geotechnical Engineering in 1991). I am a registered member in good standing of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Saskatchewan (License #06604 ), the Engineers and Geoscientists British Columbia (License #35852), the Professional Engineers of Ontario (License #90325408), the Engineers Yukon (License #1482), the Northwest Territories and Nunavut Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists (License #L1194) and a Member of the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum. I have worked in the field of Mine Waste Management, Mine Water Management and Geotechnical Engineering for a total of 35 years since my graduation from university. I have relevant experience in tailings facility design, construction, feasibility studies and technical report preparation for projects in Canada and internationally.

I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a “qualified person” for the purposes of NI 43-101.

4I have not visited the Property.

5I am responsible for parts of Sections 1, 18, 21, 25, and 26 of the Technical Report.

6I am independent of the Issuer and related companies applying all of the tests in Section 1.5 of the NI 43-101.

7I have had prior involvement with the Property in that I was a qualified person for the AMC Technical Report in 2022 (effective date of 30 November 2022).

8I have read NI 43-101 and the sections of the Technical Report for which I am responsible have been prepared in compliance with NI 43-101.

9As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the sections of the Technical Report for which I am responsible contain all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

 

Effective Date: 19 June 2024

Signing Date: 2 August 2024

 

Original signed and sealed by

Leon Botham, P.Eng.

Principal Engineer

NewFields Canada Mining & Environment ULC

 

amcconsultants.com354

Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study
 New Pacific Metals Corp.0723071

 

Our offices

 

Australia  

Adelaide

Level 1, 12 Pirie Street

Adelaide SA 5000 Australia

 

T +61 8 8201 1800

E adelaide@amcconsultants.com

Brisbane

Level 15, 100 Creek Street

Brisbane Qld 4000 Australia

 

T +61 7 3230 9000

E brisbane@amcconsultants.com

   

Melbourne

Level 12, 477 Collins Street

Melbourne Vic 3000 Australia

 

T +61 3 8601 3300

E melbourne@amcconsultants.com

Perth

Level 1, 1100 Hay Street

West Perth WA 6005 Australia

 

T +61 8 6330 1100

E perth@amcconsultants.com

   
Canada  

Toronto

140 Yonge Street, Suite 200

Toronto ON M5C 1X6 Canada

 

T +1 647 953 9730

E toronto@amcconsultants.com

Vancouver

200 Granville Street, Suite 202

Vancouver BC V6C 1S4 Canada

 

T +1 604 669 0044

E vancouver@amcconsultants.com

   
South Africa United Kingdom

Cape Town

First Floor, Willowbridge Centre

Carl Cronje Drive

Cape Town 7530 South Africa

 

T +27 720 833 231

E capetown@amcconsultants.com

Maidenhead

Registered in England and Wales

Company No. 3688365

Building 3, 1st Floor

Concorde Park, Concorde Road

Maidenhead SL6 4BY United Kingdom

 

T +44 1628 778 256

E maidenhead@amcconsultants.com

 

Registered Office:

The Kinetic Centre

Theobald Street

Elstree

Hertfordshire WD6 4PG United Kingdom

 

amcconsultants.com



CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR

I, Leon Botham, P.Eng., of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, do hereby certify that:

1     

I am currently employed as a Principal Engineer with NewFields Canada Mining & Environment ULC, with an office at 640 Broadway Avenue, Suite 204, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 1A9.

 

2     

This certificate applies to the Technical Report titled “Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study” with an effective date of 19 June 2024 (the “Technical Report”), prepared for New Pacific Metals Corp. (“the Issuer”) in respect of the Issuer's Silver Sand property (the "Property").

 

3     

I am a graduate of the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon, Canada (B.E. Civil Engineering in 1988) and Purdue University in Indiana, United States (MSCE Civil/Geotechnical Engineering in 1991). I am a registered member in good standing of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Saskatchewan (License #06604), the Engineers and Geoscientists British Columbia (License #35852), the Professional Engineers of Ontario (License #90325408), the Engineers Yukon (License #1482), the Northwest Territories and Nunavut Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists (License #L1194) and a Member of the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum. I have worked in the field of Mine Waste Management, Mine Water Management and Geotechnical Engineering for a total of 35 years since my graduation from university. I have relevant experience in tailings facility design, construction, feasibility studies and technical report preparation for projects in Canada and internationally.

 

 

I have read the definition of "qualified person" set out in National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a "qualified person" for the purposes of NI 43-101.

 

4     

I have not visited the Property.

 

5     

I am responsible for parts of Sections 1, 18, 21, 25, and 26 of the Technical Report.

 

6     

I am independent of the Issuer and related companies applying all of the tests in Section 1.5 of the NI 43-101.

 

7     

I have had prior involvement with the Property in that I was a qualified person for the AMC Technical Report in 2022 (effective date of 30 November 2022).

 

8     

I have read NI 43-101 and the sections of the Technical Report for which I am responsible have been prepared in compliance with NI 43-101.

 

9     

As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the sections of the Technical Report for which I am responsible contain all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

Effective Date: 19 June 2024
Signing Date: 2 August 2024

Original signed by

Leon Botham, P.Eng.
Principal Engineer
NewFields Canada Mining & Environment ULC




CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR

I, Andrew Holloway, P.Eng., do hereby certify that:

1     

I am currently employed as Process Director with Halyard Inc., with an office at 212 King St. West, Suite 501, Toronto, Ontario M5H 1K5.

 

2     

This certificate applies to the Technical Report titled “Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study” with an effective date of 19 June 2024 (the “Technical Report”), prepared for New Pacific Metals Corp. (“the Issuer”) in respect of the Issuer's Silver Sand property (the "Property").

 

3     

I graduated from the University of Newcastle upon Tyne, England, B.Eng. (Hons) Metallurgy, 1989. I am a registered member in good standing of the Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario (Membership #100082475). I have practiced my profession in the mining industry continuously since graduation.

 

 

My relevant experience with respect to process plant engineering, precious metals metallurgy and metals marketing includes 34 years’ experience in the mining sector, working for operating mining companies, engineering companies and mining consultancies.

 
 

I have read the definition of "qualified person" set out in National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a "qualified person" for the purposes of NI 43-101.

 

4     

I visited the Property from 14 - 16 January 2020 for 3 days.

 

5     

I am responsible for Sections 13, 17, 19 and parts of 1, 21, 25, 26, and 27 of the Technical Report.

 

6     

I am independent of the Issuer and related companies applying all of the tests in Section 1.5 of the NI 43-101.

 

7     

I have had prior involvement with the Property in that I was a qualified person for previous AMC Technical Report on the Silver Sand Property in 2020 (dated 25 May 2020, amended and restated on 3 June 2020 with an effective date of 16 January 2020) and for the AMC Technical Report in 2022 (effective date of 30 November 2022).

 

8     

I have read NI 43-101 and the sections of the Technical Report for which I am responsible have been prepared in compliance with NI 43-101.

 

9     

As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the sections of the Technical Report for which I am responsible contain all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

Effective Date: 19 June 2024
Signing Date: 1 August 2024

Original signed by

Andrew Holloway, P.Eng.
Process Director, Halyard Inc.





CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR

I, Mo Molavi, P.Eng., of Vancouver, British Columbia, do hereby certify that:

1     

I am currently employed as a Director / Mining Services Manager / Principal Mining Engineer with AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., with an office at Suite 202, 200 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 1S4.

 

2     

This certificate applies to the Technical Report titled “Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study” with an effective date of 19 June 2024 (the “Technical Report”), prepared for New Pacific Metals Corp. (“the Issuer”) in respect of the Issuer's Silver Sand property (the "Property").

 

3     

I am a graduate from Laurentian University in Sudbury, Canada (Bachelor of Engineering in 1979) and McGill University of Montreal, Canada (Master of Engineering in Rock Mechanics and Mining Methods in 1987). I am a registered member in good standing of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Saskatchewan (License #5646), the Engineers and Geoscientists British Columbia (Registration #37594), and a Member of the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum. I have worked as a Mining Engineer for a total of 45 years since my graduation from university and have relevant experience in project management, feasibility studies, and technical report preparations for mining projects.

 

 

I have read the definition of "qualified person" set out in National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a "qualified person" for the purposes of NI 43-101.

 

4     

I have not visited the Property.

 

5     

I am responsible for parts of Sections 1, 18, 25, and 26 of the Technical Report.

 

6     

I am independent of the Issuer and related companies applying all of the tests in Section 1.5 of the NI 43-101.

 

7     

I have had prior involvement with the Property in that I was a qualified person for the AMC Technical Report in 2022 (effective date of 30 November 2022).

 

8     

I have read NI 43-101 and the sections of the Technical Report for which I am responsible have been prepared in compliance with NI 43-101.

 

9     

As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the sections of the Technical Report for which I am responsible contain all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

Effective Date: 19 June 2024
Signing Date: 31 July 2024

Original signed by

Mo Molavi, P.Eng.
Director / Mining Services Manager / Principal Mining Engineer
AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd.




CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR

I, Dinara Nussipakynova, P.Geo., of North Vancouver, British Columbia, do hereby certify that:

1     

I am currently employed as a Principal Geologist with BBA Engineering Ltd., with an office at 1050 West Pender Street, Suite 800, Vancouver, British Columbia V6E 3S7.

 

2     

This certificate applies to the Technical Report titled “Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study” with an effective date of 19 June 2024 (the “Technical Report”), prepared for New Pacific Metals Corp. (“the Issuer”).

 

3     

I am a graduate of Kazakh National Polytechnic University (Bachelor of Science and Master of Science in Geology in 1987). I am a member in good standing of the Association of Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia (Registration #37412) and the Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario (Registration #1298). I have practiced my profession continuously since 1987 and have been involved in mineral exploration and mine geology for a total of 35 years since my graduation from university. My experience is principally in Mineral Resource estimation, database management, and geological interpretation.

 

 

I have read the definition of "qualified person" set out in National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a "qualified person" for the purposes of NI 43-101.

 

4     

I visited the Property from 28 - 29 May 2022 for 2 days.

 

5     

I am responsible for Sections 7 - 12, 14 and parts of 1, 25, 26, and 27 of the Technical Report.

 

6     

I am independent of the Issuer and related companies applying all of the tests in Section 1.5 of the NI 43-101.

 

7     

I have had prior involvement with the Property in that I was a qualified person for previous AMC Technical Report in 2020 (dated 25 May 2020, amended and restated on 3 June 2020 with an effective date of 16 January 2020), as well as the AMC Technical Report in 2022 (effective date of 30 November 2022).

 

8     

I have read NI 43-101 and the sections of the Technical Report for which I am responsible have been prepared in compliance with NI 43-101.

 

9     

As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the sections of the Technical Report for which I am responsible contain all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

Effective Date: 19 June 2024
Signing Date: 1 August 2024

Original signed by

Dinara Nussipakynova, P.Geo.
Principal Geologist
BBA Engineering Ltd.





CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR

I, Wayne Rogers, P.Eng., of Vancouver, British Columbia, do hereby certify that:

1     

I am currently employed as a Principal Mining Engineer and Open Pit Manager with AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., with an office at Suite 202, 200 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 1S4.

 

2      

This certificate applies to the Technical Report titled “Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study” with an effective date of 19 June 2024, (the “Technical Report”), prepared for New Pacific Metals Corp. (“the Issuer”) in respect of the Issuer's Silver Sand property (the "Property").

 

3     

I am a graduate of the University of Western Australia in Perth, Australia (Bachelor of Mining Engineering in 2005) and the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia (Master of Philosophy (MPhil) in Mining Engineering in 2014). I am a member in good standing of the Engineers and Geoscientists British Columbia (Registration #49953). I have worked as a Mining Engineer for a total of 19 years since my graduation from university and have relevant experience in project management, feasibility studies, and technical report preparations for mining projects. My expertise includes strategic and tactical mine planning, mine design, mine optimization, feasibility studies, and drill and blast.

 

 

I have read the definition of "qualified person" set out in National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a "qualified person" for the purposes of NI 43-101.

 

4     

I visited the Property from 4-5 May 2023 for 2 days.

 

5     

I am responsible for Sections 15, 16, 22 and parts of 1, 21, 25, 26, and 27 of the Technical Report.

 

6     

I am independent of the Issuer and related companies applying all of the tests in Section 1.5 of the NI 43-101.

 

7     

I have had prior involvement with the Property in that I was a qualified person for the AMC Technical Report in 2022 (effective date of 30 November 2022).

 

8     

I have read NI 43-101 and the sections of the Technical Report for which I am responsible have been prepared in compliance with NI 43-101.

 

9     

As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the sections of the Technical Report for which I am responsible contain all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

Effective Date: 19 June 2024
Signing Date: 31 July 2024

Original signed by

Wayne Rogers, P.Eng.
Open Pit Manager / Principal Mining Engineer
AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd.





CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR

I, Eugene Tucker, P.Eng., of Vancouver, British Columbia, do hereby certify that:

1     

I am currently employed as a Principal Mining Engineer and Regional Manager - Canada with AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. with an office at Suite 202, 200 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 1S4.

 

2     

This certificate applies to the technical report titled “Silver Sand Project Pre-Feasibility Study”, with an effective date of 19 June 2024, (the “Technical Report”) prepared for New Pacific Metals Corp. (“the Issuer”) in respect of the Issuer's Silver Sand property (the "Property").

 

3     

I am a graduate of the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada (Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering in 1996 and Master of Engineering in 1999). I am a registered member in good standing with Engineers and Geoscientists British Columbia (License #30131) and Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta (License #60027). I have worked as a Mining Engineer for a total of 25 years and have relevant experience in open pit mining of gold, base metals and coal, design and planning, mine production and financial evaluation, reserve estimation, technical reviews, feasibility and pre-feasibility studies, project and construction management, contracts management and cost estimation.

 

 

I have read the definition of "qualified person" set out in National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a "qualified person" for the purposes of NI 43-101.

 

4     

I have not visited the Property.

 

5     

I am responsible for Sections 2-6, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26 and part of 1 of the Technical Report.

 

6     

I am independent of the Issuer and any related companies as described in Section 1.5 of the NI 43-101;

 

7     

I have not had prior involvement with the property that is the subject of the Technical Report;

 

8     

I have read NI 43-101, and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with NI 43- 101 and Form 43-101F1.

 

9     

As of the effective date of the Technical Report and the date of this certificate, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, this Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

Effective Date: 19 June 2024
Signing Date: 6 August 2024

Original signed by

Eugene Tucker, P.Eng.
Regional Manager – Canada / Principal Mining Engineer
AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd.




Grafico Azioni New Pacific Metals (AMEX:NEWP)
Storico
Da Nov 2024 a Dic 2024 Clicca qui per i Grafici di New Pacific Metals
Grafico Azioni New Pacific Metals (AMEX:NEWP)
Storico
Da Dic 2023 a Dic 2024 Clicca qui per i Grafici di New Pacific Metals