Notice of Capital One Financial Corporation’s
2025 Annual Stockholder Meeting
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for
the Stockholder Meeting to be held on May 8, 2025
The Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders are available at www.proxyvote.com
The 2025 Annual Stockholder Meeting of Capital One Financial Corporation (“Capital One” or “Company”) will be held at Capital One’s campus at 1600 Capital One Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102 on May 8, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time.
Items of Business
As a stockholder, you will be asked to:
|
|
|
1. |
|
Elect twelve nominated directors, who are listed in the proxy statement, as directors of Capital One; |
|
|
2. |
|
Approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, our Named Executive Officer compensation (“Say on Pay”); |
|
|
3. |
|
Ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2025; and |
|
|
4. |
|
Consider a stockholder proposal, if properly presented at the meeting. |
Stockholders will also transact other business that may properly come before the meeting.
Record Date
You may vote if you held shares of Capital One common stock as of the close of business on March 12, 2025 (“Record Date”).
Proxy Voting
Your vote is important. You may vote your shares in advance of the meeting via the Internet, by telephone, by mail, or in person at the 2025 Annual Stockholder Meeting. Please refer to the section “How do I vote?” in the proxy statement for detailed voting instructions. If you vote via the Internet, by telephone, or plan to vote in person during the 2025 Annual Stockholder Meeting, you do not need to mail in a proxy card.
2025 Annual Stockholder Meeting Admission
Due to space limitations, attendance is limited to stockholders and persons holding valid legal proxies from those stockholders. Admission to the meeting is on a first-come, first-served basis. Registration will begin at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time. Valid government-issued identification must be presented to attend the meeting. If you hold Capital One common stock through a broker, bank, trust, or other nominee, you must bring a copy of a statement reflecting your stock ownership as of the Record Date, and if you wish to vote in person, you must also bring a legal proxy from your broker, bank, trust, or other nominee. Cameras, recording devices, and other electronic devices are not permitted. If you require special assistance at the meeting, please contact the Corporate Secretary at 1600 Capital One Drive, McLean, VA 22102.
We look forward to seeing you at the meeting.
On behalf of the Board,
Matthew W. Cooper
Corporate Secretary
March 27, 2025
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One
Overview of Corporate Governance at Capital One
Capital One is dedicated to strong and effective corporate governance that is designed to provide the appropriate framework for the Board to engage with and oversee the management of the Company. Robust and dynamic corporate governance policies and practices are the foundation of an effective and well-functioning board and are vital to preserving the trust of our stakeholders, including customers, stockholders, regulators, suppliers, associates, our communities, and the general public.
Information About Our Corporate Governance Policies and Guidelines
The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines to formalize its governance practices and provide its view of effective governance. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines embody many of our long-standing practices, policies, and procedures, which collectively form a corporate governance framework that promotes the long-term interests of our stockholders, promotes responsible decision-making and accountability, and fosters a culture that allows our Board and management to pursue Capital One’s strategic objectives.
To maintain and enhance independent oversight, our Board regularly reviews and refreshes its governance policies and practices in connection with changes in corporate strategy, the regulatory environment, financial market conditions, industry best practices, or other significant events, as well as in response to investor and other stakeholder feedback and engagement.
The Board has also adopted Capital One’s Code of Conduct, which applies to Capital One’s directors, executives, and associates, including Capital One’s CEO, CFO, Principal Accounting Officer, Chief Risk Officers, and other associates performing similar functions. The Code of Conduct reflects Capital One’s commitment to honesty, fair dealing, and integrity, and guides the ethical actions and working relationships of Capital One’s directors, executives, and associates.
For a description of the key governance practices of our Board, see “Key Board Governance Practices” beginning on page 24.
The following corporate governance documents are available at www.capitalone.com under “Investors,” then “Governance & Leadership,” then “Board of Directors and Committee Documents” or “Organizational and Governance Documents,” as applicable.
|
∎ |
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws |
|
∎ |
|
Corporate Governance Guidelines |
|
∎ |
|
Board Committee Charters |
|
∎ |
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation |
Board Leadership Structure
The Independent Directors annually evaluate the continued effectiveness of the Board’s leadership structure, including the effectiveness of the combined Chairman/CEO and Lead Independent Director leadership structure, in the context of Capital One’s specific circumstances, culture, strategic objectives, and challenges. The Board currently believes that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders that the Chairman and CEO roles should be held by the same person.
We believe that our existing Board leadership structure of a combined Chairman/CEO and a Lead Independent Director provides the most effective governance framework and allows our Company to benefit from Mr. Fairbank’s talent, knowledge, and leadership as the founder of Capital One and allows him to use the in-depth
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
|
2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
21 |
|
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
Stockholders may nominate directors by submitting the names and other relevant information as required by, and in compliance with, Capital One’s Bylaws to the Corporate Secretary as well as to the Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee at Capital One’s address set forth in the section “How to Contact Us” on page 49.
In addition, an eligible stockholder or group of stockholders may use Capital One’s “proxy access” Bylaws to include stockholder-nominated director candidates in the Company’s proxy materials for the annual stockholder meeting. Our Bylaws permit up to 20 stockholders or beneficial owners owning 3% or more in the aggregate of the Company’s outstanding common shares of voting stock continuously for at least three years to nominate and include in the Company’s proxy materials director nominees constituting up to two individuals or 20% of the Board (whichever is greater) provided that the stockholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in the Bylaws.
Written notices pursuant to the above Bylaws provisions must be submitted in accordance with the general procedures for stockholder nominations (including deadlines for notice to be received by the Corporate Secretary), which are summarized under the caption “Stockholder Proposals for 2026 Annual Stockholder Meeting” on page 129.
Director Independence
Except for our CEO, who is the Company’s founder, the Board has affirmatively determined that all nominees for election to our Board are independent under Capital One’s Director Independence Standards (“Independence Standards”), which have been adopted by the Board as part of Capital One’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Independence Standards reflect the director independence requirements set forth in the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules and other applicable legal and regulatory rules, and also describe certain categorical relationships that the Board has determined to be immaterial for purposes of determining director independence.
The categorical relationships that the Board has deemed immaterial for purposes of determining director independence are: (i) relationships between Capital One and an entity where the director serves solely as a non-management director; (ii) transactions between Capital One and a director or a director’s immediate family member (or their primary business affiliations) that fall below the numerical thresholds in the NYSE rules (or do not otherwise preclude independence under those standards), and that are ordinary course, on arm’s-length market terms, and, in the case of extensions of credit, followed usual underwriting procedures, present no more than the normal collectability risk, or other unfavorable features and are in compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements; and (iii) discretionary contributions made by Capital One to not-for-profit organizations, foundations, or universities in which a director (or immediate family member) serves as an executive officer that in any single fiscal year within the last three years do not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of that entity’s consolidated gross revenues.
In making its independence recommendations, the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board evaluate information regarding each director’s relationships, transactions, or arrangements with Capital One, and those of their immediate family members and primary business or charitable affiliations and other potential conflicts of interest, including information obtained from non-management directors’ annual questionnaires. In assessing the materiality of relationships with Capital One, the Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances.
Capital One’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, including information relating to the Independence Standards, are available at www.capitalone.com under “Investors,” then “Governance & Leadership,” then “Organizational and Governance Documents.”
Director Onboarding and Education
The Company, in consultation with the Governance and Nominating Committee, has established director onboarding and continuing director education programs to support our directors in fulfilling their responsibilities and to assist them in keeping current on industry, corporate, regulatory, and other developments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
|
2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
All new directors participate in the Company’s director onboarding program, which provides training relating to the Company’s values, strategic plans, accounting policies, financial reporting, risk management, code of ethics, key regulatory issues, competition, and industry dynamics. As part of this onboarding program, over a period of approximately 18 months, new directors meet with members of senior management serving in various roles and functions, as well as Board committee chairs, the Lead Independent Director, and individual directors, to review and discuss information about the Company, the business, the boardroom, and individual director roles and responsibilities. Additionally, new directors are assigned an experienced director to serve as a mentor to facilitate their onboarding to the Board and the Company.
As we continue to enhance our director onboarding experience, the Company developed committee onboarding programs, which are designed to facilitate and accelerate directors’ integration and contribution to the committees on which they serve.
Our continuing director education program is designed to provide: (i) regular updates on external opportunities for continuing education offered by applicable regulators, professional organizations, and academic institutions; (ii) internal director education programs; (iii) various board-related publications; and (iv) access to various peer-to-peer networks. Our directors are also encouraged to pursue other educational opportunities, at the Company’s expense, to enhance directors’ ability to perform their duties.
Executive Sessions
Our Independent Directors regularly convene executive sessions led by the Lead Independent Director at Board and committee meetings, as needed. The executive sessions allow the Independent Directors to discuss strategy, CEO and senior management performance and compensation, succession planning, Board effectiveness, and other matters without management present.
During these executive sessions, the Independent Directors have access to members of senior management upon request, including, but not limited to, the CEO, CFO, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Chief Risk Officers, Chief Audit Officer, Chief Information Security Officer, Chief Technology Risk Officer, Chief Credit Review Officer, and Chief Compliance Officer.
Directors Are Actively Engaged Outside of Board Meetings
Engagement outside of Board meetings provides our directors with additional insight into our business and industry. It also provides our Board with a valuable perspective on the performance of our Company, Board, CEO, and other members of senior management.
|
∎ |
|
Our committee chairs and Lead Independent Director meet and communicate regularly with each other and with both the CEO and members of our management team, as well as with our federal regulators, often independently of the CEO. |
|
∎ |
|
Our committee chairs and Lead Independent Director conduct pre-meeting reviews of agendas and meeting materials, and provide feedback directly to management, and conduct post-meeting debriefs with management to discuss any follow-up items. |
|
∎ |
|
Individual directors confer with each other, our CEO, members of our senior management team, and other key associates, as needed. |
Annual Board and Committee Evaluations
Annually, in compliance with the NYSE rules and other applicable laws, rules, and regulations and our committee charters, the Board and its committees conduct formal self-evaluations to assess and improve the Board’s effectiveness and functionality. The Board believes that in addition to serving as a tool to evaluate and improve
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
|
2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
27 |
|
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
challenge to management. Based on her performance, the Independent Directors unanimously supported Ms. Hackett’s re-election as Lead Independent Director for a one-year term beginning May 2024.
Annual Performance Assessment of the CEO
Led by the Lead Independent Director, the Independent Directors annually assess the performance of Mr. Fairbank as Capital One’s CEO through a process developed and overseen by the Governance and Nominating Committee. This process includes an in-depth discussion of the CEO’s performance by the Independent Directors in executive session at a joint meeting of the Compensation Committee and the Board during which directors consider a variety of factors. The areas assessed relate to overall CEO performance, leadership, financial and operating performance, governance and risk management, strategic performance, and customer and associate satisfaction. The Independent Directors also consider feedback from the Board and self-assessment materials provided by Mr. Fairbank regarding his and the Company’s performance and achievements during the performance year. For additional information, see “Chief Executive Officer Compensation” beginning on page 67.
The annual CEO performance assessment is completed as part of Capital One’s year-end compensation process. The Compensation Committee manages year-end compensation decisions within the context of such assessment and recommends compensation for the CEO based on such assessment to the Independent Directors for approval. The Lead Independent Director and Chair of the Compensation Committee jointly share the feedback from the CEO performance assessment with Mr. Fairbank in a closed session.
The Board’s Role in Corporate Oversight
Capital One is dedicated to strong and effective corporate governance that provides the appropriate framework for the Board to engage with and oversee the Company. Our Board is accountable for oversight of Capital One’s business affairs and operations. In carrying out this responsibility, among other things, the Board and its committees oversee management’s development and implementation of the Company’s (i): corporate culture; (ii) corporate strategy; (iii) financial performance and associated risks; (iv) enterprise-wide risk management framework, including cybersecurity and technology risk; (v) succession planning for the Company’s CEO and other key executives; (vi) compensation policies and practices; and (vii) policies, programs, and strategies related to ESG matters.
The Board and its committees regularly review and approve key governance policies and plans, including our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which facilitate efficient and effective Board oversight. These Guidelines enable our Board to engage in responsible decision-making, work with management to pursue Capital One’s strategic objectives, and promote the long-term interests of our stockholders.
Corporate Culture
Capital One believes that a strong, ethical corporate culture is a key element of sound and sustainable corporate governance practices, beginning at the top with the CEO and other senior leadership. The Board plays a critical role in supporting and overseeing Capital One’s corporate culture, mission, and values, and sets the “tone at the top” by adopting policies, a code of ethics, a philosophy for hiring, and compensation practices that promote ethical behavior, compliance with laws and regulations (including those pertaining to consumer protection and privacy), effective internal controls and risk management, and sound governance. The Company’s programs, policies, and practices also support a strong and sustainable culture in several ways, including through the corporate governance framework, risk management program, ethics program, and talent management and compensation policies and practices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
|
2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
The Board and its committees oversee and regularly engage with management on the Company’s culture including, among other things:
|
∎ |
|
Reviewing and overseeing Capital One’s strategy, engaging in constructive dialogue with the CEO and senior executives on the alignment of the Company’s culture, mission, and values with its long-term strategy during the annual Board strategy meeting (which is further discussed below under “Corporate Strategy”) and periodically throughout the year; |
|
∎ |
|
Reviewing and adopting employment policies, compensation plans and incentive structures that promote effective internal controls and governance and overall ethical behavior; |
|
∎ |
|
Engaging with the Chief Human Resources Officer regarding associate engagement surveys (which include associate feedback on the Company’s culture, mission, and values), associate retention and turnover metrics, employment policies and benefits, and the Company’s diversity, inclusion, and belonging efforts and results; and |
|
∎ |
|
Approving and overseeing implementation of the Company’s Code of Conduct, and receiving regular reporting from the Chief Compliance Officer on the Company’s ethics program and associate conduct. |
Corporate Strategy
Capital One’s Board is responsible for reviewing, overseeing, and approving the creation and implementation of the Company’s strategy. Management, with guidance from the Board, is responsible for developing, communicating, and implementing a strategy that is designed to allow Capital One to: (i) invest in long-term capabilities and opportunities; (ii) secure competitive, endgame positions in our key businesses; (iii) attract and retain customers; (iv) grow resiliently; (v) promote ethical behavior and compliance with applicable laws and regulations; (vi) withstand economic stress and market volatility; and (vii) adhere to the Board’s established risk appetite programs. These strategies allow Capital One to deliver long-term value to our stockholders while helping customers succeed, associates grow, and communities thrive.
The development, vetting, and communication of Capital One’s strategy is an ongoing, iterative process that involves the Board, the CEO, the Presidents of our lines of business, the CFO, the General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, the Chief Enterprise Risk Officer, all other Executive Committee members, the Chief Audit Officer, the Corporate Strategy team, and other leaders across the enterprise. Each year, the Board participates in a set of dedicated meetings focused on long-term strategy where the CEO and key senior leaders present the Company’s top strategic priorities and initiatives to the Board. The Board provides input, feedback and effective challenge that guide the Company’s strategic priorities and investments. Following these sessions, the Board reviews assessments of the Company’s strategic initiatives, performed by the independent risk management and internal audit functions, as well as approves the Company’s formal Strategic Plan. Furthermore, the independent risk management function regularly provides the Risk Committee with, among other things, reporting on the Company’s performance against its risk appetite metrics, assessments of the external environment, and positioning in the context of key risk categories.
The Board regularly reviews the financial, competitive, and risk performance of the Company and receives updates on key strategic initiatives. Each line of business also reports to the Board the progress on their strategic and financial initiatives on an annual basis. Capital One assesses performance against strategic initiatives by reviewing the Company’s financial performance, competitive positioning and market share, technology capabilities, performance against risk appetites and limits, customer satisfaction and advocacy scores, talent management, system availability and downtime statistics, risk ratings and measurements, market-based indicators, and other quantitative and qualitative performance assessments. Utilizing a diversity of measurement tools, the Board remains informed and can carefully monitor and assess the progress and effectiveness of our strategic positioning and performance. The Board also regularly engages management in discussions regarding financial performance and trajectory, stockholder feedback, capital allocation, strategy implementation, risk mitigation plans, and other matters affecting the Company’s long-term strategy, as appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
|
2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
31 |
|
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
Financial Performance and Associated Risks
The Board oversees the Company’s financial performance by reviewing with management, on a regular basis, the Company’s quarterly and annual financial statements. The Audit Committee oversees the integrity of the Company’s financial statements by, among other things, obtaining independent assurance as to the completeness and accuracy of the Company’s financial statements from an independent registered public accounting firm, whose qualifications, independence, and performance it reviews on an annual basis. The Audit Committee also oversees the integrity of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting by, among other things, reviewing periodic assessments of the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company’s financial controls performed by both the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and the Company’s internal audit function. In addition, the Board, either directly or through the Risk Committee, plays an integral role in the oversight of capital management, funding of the balance sheet, liquidity and market risk management, management of the Company’s investment portfolio, and the management of other asset and liability risk matters.
Enterprise-Wide Risk Management Framework
Effective risk management and control processes are critical to our safety and soundness, our ability to comply with laws, rules and regulations, our ability to predict and manage the challenges that Capital One and the financial services industry face and, ultimately, our long-term corporate success. The enterprise-wide risk management framework defines the Board’s appetite for risk taking and enables senior management to understand, manage and report on risk. The risk management framework is implemented enterprise-wide and includes seven major risk categories: compliance, credit, liquidity, market, operational, reputation, and strategic.
The Board’s role in risk oversight of Capital One is consistent with its leadership structure, with the CEO and other members of senior management having responsibility for assessing and managing Capital One’s risk exposure on a day-to-day basis, and the Board and its committees providing oversight in connection with these efforts. The full Board, with the support of its committees, oversees the entire enterprise-wide risk management framework for the Company. The Board’s oversight focuses on our material risks and any notable emerging risks to ensure that Capital One’s risk management is adequate. The Chair of the Risk Committee, in collaboration with the Lead Independent Director, helps ensure that the Board has appropriate discussions on risk topics. The Risk Committee is responsible for setting and recommending to the Board for approval risk appetites taking into account the Company’s structure, risk profile, complexity, activities, size, and other appropriate risk-related factors. The Risk Committee considers both current risk, including timeframes reflected by those risks, as well as emerging risks and future threats.
At the management level, senior management committees serve as governance forums for the CEO, Chief Risk Officers, and other members of senior management to receive and discuss risk management information, reports, views, and escalated matters from the lines of business, the independent risk management function, the internal audit function, and other areas of the Company. Enterprise-wide risk management is generally the responsibility of the Chief Risk Officers. The Chief Enterprise Risk Officer has accountability for proposing risk appetites, limits, and reporting levels related to compliance, operational, reputation, and strategic risk, and the Chief Credit and Financial Risk Officer has accountability for proposing risk appetites, limits, and reporting levels related to credit, liquidity, and market risk. The Chief Enterprise Risk Officer is also responsible for ensuring that the Company has an overall enterprise risk framework and that it routinely assesses and reports on enterprise level risks. The Chief Risk Officers report both to the CEO and to the Risk Committee, and update the Risk Committee regularly on a variety of risk matters, including the Company’s performance against risk metrics, in addition to ad hoc reports on emerging risks. In addition, the Risk Committee and the Board participate in periodic education sessions on emerging trends and risk matters, such as evolving cybersecurity threats and generative artificial intelligence.
The Board and its committees meet with outside advisors periodically, as appropriate and necessary, and are empowered to consult at any time with outside advisors to support their oversight responsibilities. The Audit Committee also plays an important risk oversight function, including oversight of financial risks as further discussed above in “Financial Performance and Associated Risks.” The Compensation Committee oversees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
|
2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
compensation policies and practices to ensure balanced risk-taking in our compensation programs, practices, and decisions as further described in “Compensation Policies and Practices” below.
Cybersecurity and Technology Risk
As a financial services company entrusted with the safeguarding of sensitive information, including sensitive personal information, we believe that a strong enterprise cybersecurity program is a vital component of effectively managing risks related to the confidentiality, integrity, availability, and security of our data. The Risk Committee of the Board is responsible for overseeing our enterprise risk management framework, including cybersecurity and technology risk. At least quarterly, the Risk Committee receives reports from management on our cybersecurity and technology risk, key enterprise cybersecurity initiatives, and on any identified significant threats or incidents, or new risk developments.
The Risk Committee coordinates with the full Board regarding the strategic implications of cyber and technology risks. At least annually, the Board, either directly or through the Risk Committee, reviews the Company’s technology strategy with the Chief Information Officer; reviews the Company’s information security program with the Chief Information Security Officer and Chief Technology Risk Officer; and approves the Company’s information security program.
Succession Planning
Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board is responsible for maintaining a succession plan for the CEO and certain senior executive positions. A planning process has been developed and maintained to identify, develop, and assess successors to the CEO and such positions. The Board reviews and updates these succession plans at least annually, including the most recent review and update in late 2024. Our Board believes that the directors and the CEO should work together on executive succession planning and that the entire Board should be involved. Each year, as part of the succession planning process, our CEO provides the Board with recommendations on, and evaluations of, potential CEO successors. The Board considers a number of factors such as experience, skills, competencies, and potential in its review of the senior executive team to assess which executives possess or can develop the attributes that the Board believes are necessary to lead and achieve the Company’s goals. Among other steps taken to promote this process throughout the year, executives one and two levels below the CEO often attend Board meetings and present to the Board, providing the Board with numerous opportunities to interact with our senior management and assess their leadership capabilities. Additionally, each line of business, independent risk management, internal audit, and finance functions engage in succession planning for key roles at least once per year. The Chief Human Resources Officer reviews these line of business and functional area succession plans.
In addition to the general succession plan, our Board proactively reviewed plans for temporary successors across key roles in 2024. The temporary succession plan is intended to identify the leaders who can assume the responsibilities in the immediate short-term to ensure business continuity, day-to-day management of the team and business for our senior management, and other key roles. Our Board also has established steps to address emergency CEO succession planning for an unplanned CEO succession event. Our emergency CEO succession planning is intended to enable our Company to respond to an unexpected CEO transition by continuing our Company’s safe and sound operation and minimizing potential disruption or loss of continuity to our Company’s operations and strategy. The Board reviews annually the CEO’s emergency successor recommendations. As a result of this evergreen process, there is a named CEO emergency successor should the CEO become unexpectedly unable to serve.
Compensation Policies and Practices
The Compensation Committee oversees all of our compensation policies and practices, including our incentive compensation policies and practices, with a view toward ensuring that such policies and practices encourage balanced risk-taking, are compatible with effective controls and risk management, align with our business
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
|
2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
33 |
|
Section II - Corporate Governance at Capital One |
strategy, and enable the Company to attract and retain top talent, especially in key job functions. Every two years, the Compensation Committee reviews and approves the Incentive Compensation Governance Policy, which applies to all Company associates and governs incentive compensation decisions. The Incentive Compensation Governance Policy provides the framework for oversight of the design of incentive compensation programs. In setting executive compensation, the Compensation Committee assesses each of the NEOs against one or more performance objectives specifically designed to evaluate the degree to which the NEOs balanced risks inherent in their specific roles. The Compensation Committee also implements additional risk-balancing features for certain equity awards, as described in more detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 55.
In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews the Company’s NEO and other senior executive compensation programs, as well as any other material incentive compensation programs, plans, or agreements. During these reviews, the Compensation Committee discusses the Company’s most significant risks, including the Company’s status with respect to managing those risks and the relationship of those risks to compensation programs. The review includes discussion and analysis of risk-balancing features embedded in these incentive compensation programs and other actions taken by the Company to appropriately balance risk and achieve conformance with regulatory guidance. The Compensation Committee also discusses these programs with the Company’s Chief Enterprise Risk Officer, Chief Human Resources Officer, and the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, as appropriate. Based on these discussions, the Compensation Committee believes our compensation programs are consistent with safety and soundness, operate in a manner that appropriately balances risk, and are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Compensation Committee also administers the Company’s Clawback Policy.
The Compensation Committee’s active oversight, together with the Company’s interactions and discussions with its regulators, has further enhanced the Company’s risk management and control processes with respect to incentive compensation at the Company and supported our continued compliance with the interagency guidance on sound incentive compensation practices.
Policies, Programs, and Strategies Related to ESG Matters
For information regarding the Board’s role in oversight of the Company’s policies, programs, and strategies related to environmental and social practices, see “Corporate Impact at Capital One” beginning on page 45.
Stockholder Engagement
We value the input and insights of a variety of stakeholders including equity investors, debt investors, rating agencies, and analysts. We are committed to continued meaningful engagement with these stakeholders. As a result, we engage in continuous outreach throughout the year to discuss the issues that are important to them, listen to their expectations for us, and share our views. During our discussions, we also seek to provide visibility and transparency into our business, our performance, and our governance and compensation practices. We report feedback to our Board to help them respond to stockholders’ concerns and feedback.
Stockholder Engagement Program
Management and our Investor Relations team engaged in direct outreach and discussions with stockholders in a variety of forums. In 2024, our teams attended 17 investor conferences and hosted over 300 investor engagements. Key topics of focus included Company strategy, financial performance, business trends, ESG matters, executive compensation, and board composition. Key features of our stockholder engagement program include: (i) continuous, year-round outreach; (ii) meaningful board-driven engagement; (iii) regular board reporting; and (iv) stockholder-driven improvements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
|
2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Executive Summary
Capital One’s executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain, motivate, and reward leaders who drive growth and innovation, deliver strong business results, and facilitate the long-term success of the Company. The Committee is responsible for, among other matters, developing, approving, monitoring, and managing the compensation of all our executive officers, including the named executive officers defined below. Final decisions regarding the compensation of our executive officers, including our CEO, are made by the Committee and the Independent Directors. This Compensation Discussion and Analysis will review the compensation of the following executive officers for 2024:
|
|
|
|
|
Named Executive Officer |
|
Position |
Richard D. Fairbank |
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
Andrew M. Young |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Frank G. LaPrade, III |
|
Chief Enterprise Services Officer and Chief of Staff to the CEO |
Matthew W. Cooper |
|
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary |
Sanjiv Yajnik |
|
President, Financial Services |
Unless otherwise indicated, “NEOs” will be used throughout this proxy statement to mean the CEO and the four executive officers listed above, collectively.
2024 Company Performance and Compensation Highlights
Each year the Committee and the Independent Directors review and evaluate the Company’s qualitative and quantitative performance to make determinations regarding the compensation of our NEOs based on Capital One’s pay-for-performance philosophy. The Committee seeks to directly link the compensation of the NEOs with the Company’s performance and the executives’ contributions to that performance.
In 2024, Capital One delivered strong financial results and made significant progress on our long-term strategic initiatives, enabled by years of transformation and growth as well as key investments in talent, technology, and risk management. The Company also announced the Discover Transaction in February 2024. The proposed transaction is subject to regulatory approval and closing conditions and we anticipate the Discover Transaction will close in early 2025.
Financial and business line financial results in 2024 were strong. The combination of strong top-line growth and disciplined expense management drove solid profitability and capital generation. Consumer credit losses continued to be impacted by delayed charge-offs from the pandemic. However, Capital One’s ability to monitor and analyze portfolio and competitive trends coming out of the pandemic, as well as management’s actions in response to these insights, has enabled the Company to successfully navigate the post-pandemic credit environment and drive favorable momentum on consumer credit results versus industry peers. Our Domestic Card business delivered strong and resilient returns and record account originations. We continued to expand our digital-first national retail bank, grow insured deposits, and drive very strong growth in checking accounts. Our Auto Finance business continued to deliver strong returns and credit performance. The Commercial Bank delivered solid results, improved credit losses and resilience amid challenging industry headwinds.
Capital One’s stock price ended 2024 at $178.32, up 36% from year-end 2023 and outperformed the KBW Bank Index by 3.2 percentage points. Capital One’s TSR, which includes the combined effect of share price change plus common dividends, was 38.3% in 2024, outpacing the KBW Bank Index and significantly outperforming the S&P 500.
Net revenue increased 6% to $39.1 billion, driven by strong Card growth and improved net interest margin. We improved our operating efficiency ratio(1) by 106 bps to 43.3%, while our adjusted operating efficiency ratio(2)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
|
2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
Section V - Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
compiled and reviewed the assessment for the Chief Enterprise Risk Officer and Chief Credit and Financial Risk Officer, before such assessments were presented to the Committee and the Independent Directors for their consideration.
In February 2025, the Committee and the Independent Directors granted long-term incentive awards, consisting of stock-settled RSUs and performance shares, to the NEOs, as recognition for individual NEO performance in 2024 and to drive further long-term performance. The long-term incentive awards granted to these NEOs for performance year 2024 ranged from approximately $2.9 million to $3.8 million. Long-term incentive awards are linked to performance in two ways:
|
∎ |
|
The size of the award is based on each NEO’s individual performance assessment for the year just completed |
|
∎ |
|
The ultimate value of the award is dependent on Capital One’s performance over time |
The terms of the performance share awards are substantially similar to the terms of the Financial Performance Shares awarded to our CEO for performance year 2024, as described earlier under “Performance Share Award Metrics” beginning on page 69. The NEOs do not receive TSR Performance Shares. The NEO stock-settled RSUs vest ratably in one-third increments starting on the first anniversary of the grant date.
2024 NEO Year-End Incentive Compensation Decisions
Andrew M. Young - Chief Financial Officer
Mr. Young was awarded a cash incentive of $1,950,000 and long-term incentive awards consisting of 6,497 stock-settled RSUs and a target amount of 7,796 performance shares with a total grant date fair value for both awards of $2,860,315. The Committee and the Independent Directors determined to grant these awards based upon Mr. Young’s leadership of the Company’s finance organization, his evaluation and integration preparation efforts relating to the Discover Transaction, his skillful approach to maintaining relationships with stockholders, his well-managed execution of key corporate initiatives, and his robust risk management. In addition, the Committee and the Independent Directors also considered Mr. Young’s collaborative partnership across the management team, sound judgment, maintenance of a strong balance sheet, funding and liquidity management, and commitment to talent development and Company culture.
Frank G. LaPrade, III - Chief Enterprise Services Officer and Chief of Staff to the CEO
Mr. LaPrade was awarded a cash incentive of $2,602,500 and long-term incentive awards consisting of 8,670 stock-settled RSUs and a target amount of 10,404 performance shares with a total grant date fair value for both awards of $3,817,089. The Committee and the Independent Directors determined to grant these awards based upon Mr. LaPrade’s role in key strategic initiatives, including the Discover Transaction and technology and data transformation initiatives, his work on critical vendor arrangements, the exceptional performance of the Company’s brand marketing, his sound judgment, and his thoughtful and rigorous management of risk. The Committee and the Independent Directors also considered Mr. LaPrade’s inspirational leadership and problem solving, as well as his demonstrated talent in recruiting, developing, and retaining strong talent.
Matthew W. Cooper - General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Mr. Cooper was awarded a cash incentive of $2,089,500 and long-term incentive awards consisting of 8,001 stock-settled RSUs and a target amount of 9,601 performance shares with a total grant date fair value for both awards of $3,522,512. The Committee and the Independent Directors determined to grant these awards to Mr. Cooper based upon his excellent execution of significant and complex legal matters, his support of international expansion and advisory work on strategic initiatives, and his leadership of regulatory and integration matters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
|
2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
Section VI - Named Executive Officer Compensation |
Mr. Young’s agreement also provides that, for a period of two years following separation from Capital One, he shall not, directly or indirectly, (i) solicit or induce any covered Capital One associate to become employed by any other person or entity, (ii) hire or otherwise engage any covered Capital One associate (or a person who was a covered associate and resigned in the prior three months) to work for or provide services to any other person or entity, or (iii) solicit or induce any Capital One employee to leave or cease their employment with Capital One, or to hire or otherwise engage any Capital One employee to work for or provide services to any other person or entity, if based on confidential information he learned about such employee while employed by Capital One.
Payments Under Certain Termination Scenarios
Upon separation from the Company, the NEOs, regardless of the reason for termination, receive certain earned, but previously unpaid, payments, such as accrued but unused vacation pay, and amounts vested under the Company’s qualified and non-qualified retirement programs. In addition, cash-settled RSUs granted to NEOs, other than the CEO, after the end of a performance year continue to vest according to the original provisions of such grants upon involuntary separation for any reason other than cause or as soon as practicable following a “double trigger” change of control (as discussed below).
Voluntary Termination
An NEO, other than the CEO, who voluntarily terminates employment with Capital One may receive payments related to non-competition covenants (described above, if applicable) and any contractual payments to which the NEO may otherwise be entitled. In addition, the NEO has the ability following separation to exercise vested but unexercised options for three months following voluntary termination.
Involuntary Termination Without Cause
An NEO, other than the CEO, whose employment with Capital One is terminated involuntarily, for performance or job elimination, is entitled to receive the amounts set forth in the Company’s executive severance plan (“Executive Severance Plan”) in exchange for executing a release of claims against the Company. For 2024, potential payments under the Executive Severance Plan were 30% of total target compensation, plus a severance bonus based on such NEO’s target cash incentive in the event of termination due to restructuring. Additional benefits include healthcare continuation subsidy through COBRA, outplacement services, and any contractual payments to which the NEO may otherwise have been entitled. Further, an NEO, other than the CEO, whose employment is terminated involuntarily without cause and not due to death or disability may receive payments related to non-competition covenants (as described above, if applicable).
Generally, performance shares granted to NEOs will vest in full, based on actual Company performance and stock-settled RSUs granted to NEOs will continue to vest, subject to the NEO’s execution of a release of claims against the Company. In addition, NEOs can exercise vested but unexercised options for two years following separation. If an NEO’s employment with Capital One is terminated because of death or disability, the NEO’s unvested RSUs and performance shares will vest in full based on target Company performance.
Payments Upon Retirement
As with all executives who are eligible for retirement, NEOs who retire from Capital One may receive the following amounts: payments related to non-competition covenants as if they had terminated voluntarily (as described above); up to 18 months of subsidized COBRA coverage; any contractual payments to which they may otherwise be entitled; and, for Messrs. Fairbank and Yajnik, who became eligible to retire on or before December 31, 2012, a retiree medical subsidy and access to a variety of medical plans through a private exchange. Retirees eligible for subsidized retiree medical coverage receive funding through a HRA which can be used to pay for health care insurance premiums or eligible claims expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
|
2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
107 |
|
Section XII - Stockholder Proposal (Item 4 on Proxy Card) |
Moreover, the change of control provisions in our equity grants protect stockholders from misaligned incentives in a change of control situation. Long-term equity compensation serves an important purpose to maintain alignment between management and stockholder interests. By protecting entitlement to that compensation during a change of control, these change of control provisions protect these aligned incentives.
The Executive Severance Plan likewise includes important protections for stockholders. In order to receive any benefits under the plan, the NEO must execute a valid release of claims against the Company. If the NEO receives severance payments under the plan, the NEO must comply with confidentiality obligations, and would be required to repay a portion of the severance payment if, among other reasons, it is subsequently determined that the NEO’s employment could have been terminated for cause. Notably, our CEO does not participate in the Executive Severance Plan.
Given that the Company’s existing severance and termination arrangements already provide reasonable, appropriate, market-competitive post-termination compensation with important stockholder protections, this proposal is unnecessary.
Our Practices Are Consistent with Market Practice for Large Financial Institutions and the Proposal Would Harm Stockholders by Placing Us at a Substantial Competitive Disadvantage in Attracting and Retaining Executive Talent.
Our severance programs and practices are consistent with market practices for large financial institutions. In addition, the arrangements are fair and are designed to protect executives financially if they are terminated through no fault of their own. They provide reasonable and appropriate post-termination cash compensation while giving the executives an opportunity to share in Company value that they helped create as part of historical, stockholder-approved annual compensation equity grants.
Given that these arrangements are customary market practice, the Board and its Compensation Committee believe that such arrangements are vital for recruiting and retaining highly qualified executives. The Company operates a global enterprise in a highly competitive business environment, and competes for talented executives with many of the world’s largest companies across business sectors. This proposal would impose restrictions on compensation arrangements that materially deviate from reasonable market norms, placing the Company at a competitive disadvantage in recruiting and retaining qualified executives.
Payments to Terminated NEOs Are Subject to Robust Governance and Oversight.
Our severance arrangements and equity compensation plan are subject to the ongoing oversight of the Board and its Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee engages an independent compensation consultant to review external benchmarking data and assist in developing our post-employment compensation and benefits within our broader executive compensation and benefit programs. The Board reviews our executive compensation program, including provisions of our severance program, at least annually. In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews each executive officer’s separation on a case-by-case basis and exercises its business judgment, with the approval of the Independent Directors, to customize the terms of the separation in consideration of relevant circumstances, including the reasons for the separation, market competitive practices for comparable separation scenarios, and other important considerations. We believe our robust governance and compensation setting processes and procedures provide reasonable and appropriate oversight over the post-employment compensation and benefits afforded to our NEOs.
In addition, unlike most non-financial institutions, our compensation programs are subject to regulatory guidance that banking organizations should ensure that the structure and terms of any golden parachute arrangements are appropriate from a safety and soundness perspective.
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
|
2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
127 |
Pay vs Performance Disclosure
|
12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2024
USD ($)
|
Dec. 31, 2023
USD ($)
|
Dec. 31, 2022
USD ($)
|
Dec. 31, 2021
USD ($)
|
Dec. 31, 2020
USD ($)
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure, Table |
As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act, we are providing the information below to illustrate the relationship between the SEC-defined compensation actually paid (“CAP”) and various measures used to gauge the Company’s financial performance in conformance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. CAP is calculated in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K and differs from compensation shown in the Summary Compensation Table on page 96 and CEO and other NEO performance year compensation tables shown on pages 78 and 85, respectively. See below for a reconciliation of the total compensation shown in the Summary Compensation Table to CAP. The Committee does not utilize CAP as the basis for making compensation decisions. For further information concerning our compensation philosophy and how we align executive compensation with our performance, see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section beginning on page 55. Pay versus Performance Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Compensation Table Total for Principal |
|
Compensation Actually Paid to PEO (1)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Initial Fixed $100 Invested Based on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 |
|
|
|
$30,829,070 |
|
|
|
|
$56,390,154 |
|
|
|
|
$7,434,305 |
|
|
|
|
$10,043,898 |
|
|
|
|
$189.44 |
|
|
|
|
$173.90 |
|
|
|
|
$4,750 |
|
|
|
|
9.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023 |
|
|
|
$28,589,573 |
|
|
|
|
$56,015,379 |
|
|
|
|
$7,171,356 |
|
|
|
|
$9,620,815 |
|
|
|
|
$137.03 |
|
|
|
|
$133.20 |
|
|
|
|
$4,887 |
|
|
|
|
18.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 |
|
|
|
$27,605,311 |
|
|
|
|
$(758,823) |
|
|
|
|
$11,374,302 |
|
|
|
|
$7,425,259 |
|
|
|
|
$94.95 |
|
|
|
|
$118.77 |
|
|
|
|
$7,360 |
|
|
|
|
(11.3)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
$20,457,553 |
|
|
|
|
$44,692,866 |
|
|
|
|
$5,404,513 |
|
|
|
|
$7,652,216 |
|
|
|
|
$145.28 |
|
|
|
|
$132.75 |
|
|
|
|
$12,390 |
|
|
|
|
15.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
$20,119,971 |
|
|
|
|
$13,578,561 |
|
|
|
|
$5,578,452 |
|
|
|
|
$4,068,566 |
|
|
|
|
$97.32 |
|
|
|
|
$98.31 |
|
|
|
|
$2,714 |
|
|
|
|
6.7% |
|
(1) |
Mr. Fairbank is represented as the principal executive officer (“PEO”) for each of the years shown. For performance year 2024, Messrs. Young, LaPrade, and Cooper are represented as the non-PEO named executive officers (“Non-PEO NEOs”). For performance year 2023, Messrs. Young, LaPrade, Yajnik, and Robert M. Alexander are represented as the Non-PEO NEOs. For performance year 2022, Messrs. Young, Neal A. Blinde, LaPrade, and Yajnik are represented as the Non-PEO NEOs. For performance year 2021, Messrs. Young, R. Scott Blackley, LaPrade, Michael J. Wassmer, and Yajnik are represented as the Non-PEO NEOs. For performance year 2020, Messrs. Blackley, LaPrade, Wassmer, and Yajnik are represented as the Non-PEO NEOs. |
(2) |
The calculation of CAP requires that we make adjustments to amounts previously reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the five years presented. The SEC’s valuation and calculation methods for CAP differ from those required in the Summary Compensation Table. The table below summarizes compensation values presented in the Summary Compensation Table and the adjusted values required to reconcile these values to the CAP presented above. The amounts shown below for Non-PEO NEOs represents an average of all Non-PEO NEOs. CAP to the PEO and Non-PEO NEOs represents Summary Compensation Table total compensation adjusted by the following amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Compensation Table Total to CAP Reconciliation (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Compensation Table Total (b) |
|
Change in Pension Value Deduction (c) |
|
Less Fair Value of Equity Awards Reported in the Summary Compensation Table in the Covered Year |
|
Plus Fair Value of Covered Year Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End |
|
Change in Fair Value of Prior Years’ Equity Awards Unvested at Fiscal Year-End |
|
Change in Fair Value of Prior Years’ Equity Awards Vested in the Covered Year |
|
Less Fair Value of Prior Year Awards Forfeited in the Covered Year (d) |
|
Plus Fair Value of Incremental Dividends or Earnings on Stock Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PEO 2024 |
|
|
|
$30,829,070 |
|
|
|
|
$(12,143) |
|
|
|
|
$(25,206,709) |
|
|
|
|
$32,092,806 |
|
|
|
|
$14,835,622 |
|
|
|
|
$2,715,253 |
|
|
|
|
$— |
|
|
|
|
$1,136,255 |
|
|
|
|
$56,390,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEOs 2024 |
|
|
|
$7,434,305 |
|
|
|
|
$— |
|
|
|
|
$(3,443,874) |
|
|
|
|
$4,415,292 |
|
|
|
|
$1,181,753 |
|
|
|
|
$346,736 |
|
|
|
|
$— |
|
|
|
|
$109,686 |
|
|
|
|
$10,043,898 |
|
|
(a) |
Fair values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 as of the end of the fiscal year, other than awards that vest in the covered year, which are valued as of the applicable vesting dates. There were no awards granted in each of the covered years that vested in the same year. |
|
(b) |
Reflects the total compensation amount reported in the Summary Compensation Table the year shown. |
|
(c) |
Reflects the aggregate change in pension value for all defined benefit plans. There are no service costs or prior service costs associated with pension benefits since the Cash Balance Pension Plan and the Excess Cash Balance Pension Plan are frozen. |
|
(d) |
Reflects awards that failed to meet vesting conditions during the covered year. |
|
(e) |
Reflects the actual CAP for the PEO and average CAP for the Non-PEO NEOs. |
(3) |
TSR is cumulative for the measurement periods beginning on December 31, 2019, and ending on the last fiscal day in 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively, calculated in accordance with Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K. “Peer Group” represents the S&P Financial Index for each year disclosed in the table. |
(4) |
D+TBV is a non-GAAP metric. D+TBV is calculated as the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of (i) the Company’s tangible book value per share at the end of each year, plus total common dividends per share paid during such year, to (ii) the Company’s tangible book value per share at the beginning of each corresponding year. |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Selected Measure Name |
Common Dividends + Growth of Tangible Book Value Per Common Share
|
|
|
|
|
Named Executive Officers, Footnote |
Mr. Fairbank is represented as the principal executive officer (“PEO”) for each of the years shown. For performance year 2024, Messrs. Young, LaPrade, and Cooper are represented as the non-PEO named executive officers (“Non-PEO NEOs”). For performance year 2023, Messrs. Young, LaPrade, Yajnik, and Robert M. Alexander are represented as the Non-PEO NEOs. For performance year 2022, Messrs. Young, Neal A. Blinde, LaPrade, and Yajnik are represented as the Non-PEO NEOs. For performance year 2021, Messrs. Young, R. Scott Blackley, LaPrade, Michael J. Wassmer, and Yajnik are represented as the Non-PEO NEOs. For performance year 2020, Messrs. Blackley, LaPrade, Wassmer, and Yajnik are represented as the Non-PEO NEOs.
|
|
|
|
|
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote |
TSR is cumulative for the measurement periods beginning on December 31, 2019, and ending on the last fiscal day in 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively, calculated in accordance with Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K. “Peer Group” represents the S&P Financial Index for each year disclosed in the table.
|
|
|
|
|
PEO Total Compensation Amount |
$ 30,829,070
|
$ 28,589,573
|
$ 27,605,311
|
$ 20,457,553
|
$ 20,119,971
|
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount |
$ 56,390,154
|
56,015,379
|
(758,823)
|
44,692,866
|
13,578,561
|
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote |
(2) |
The calculation of CAP requires that we make adjustments to amounts previously reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the five years presented. The SEC’s valuation and calculation methods for CAP differ from those required in the Summary Compensation Table. The table below summarizes compensation values presented in the Summary Compensation Table and the adjusted values required to reconcile these values to the CAP presented above. The amounts shown below for Non-PEO NEOs represents an average of all Non-PEO NEOs. CAP to the PEO and Non-PEO NEOs represents Summary Compensation Table total compensation adjusted by the following amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Compensation Table Total to CAP Reconciliation (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Compensation Table Total (b) |
|
Change in Pension Value Deduction (c) |
|
Less Fair Value of Equity Awards Reported in the Summary Compensation Table in the Covered Year |
|
Plus Fair Value of Covered Year Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End |
|
Change in Fair Value of Prior Years’ Equity Awards Unvested at Fiscal Year-End |
|
Change in Fair Value of Prior Years’ Equity Awards Vested in the Covered Year |
|
Less Fair Value of Prior Year Awards Forfeited in the Covered Year (d) |
|
Plus Fair Value of Incremental Dividends or Earnings on Stock Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PEO 2024 |
|
|
|
$30,829,070 |
|
|
|
|
$(12,143) |
|
|
|
|
$(25,206,709) |
|
|
|
|
$32,092,806 |
|
|
|
|
$14,835,622 |
|
|
|
|
$2,715,253 |
|
|
|
|
$— |
|
|
|
|
$1,136,255 |
|
|
|
|
$56,390,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEOs 2024 |
|
|
|
$7,434,305 |
|
|
|
|
$— |
|
|
|
|
$(3,443,874) |
|
|
|
|
$4,415,292 |
|
|
|
|
$1,181,753 |
|
|
|
|
$346,736 |
|
|
|
|
$— |
|
|
|
|
$109,686 |
|
|
|
|
$10,043,898 |
|
|
(a) |
Fair values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 as of the end of the fiscal year, other than awards that vest in the covered year, which are valued as of the applicable vesting dates. There were no awards granted in each of the covered years that vested in the same year. |
|
(b) |
Reflects the total compensation amount reported in the Summary Compensation Table the year shown. |
|
(c) |
Reflects the aggregate change in pension value for all defined benefit plans. There are no service costs or prior service costs associated with pension benefits since the Cash Balance Pension Plan and the Excess Cash Balance Pension Plan are frozen. |
|
(d) |
Reflects awards that failed to meet vesting conditions during the covered year. |
|
(e) |
Reflects the actual CAP for the PEO and average CAP for the Non-PEO NEOs. |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount |
$ 7,434,305
|
7,171,356
|
11,374,302
|
5,404,513
|
5,578,452
|
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount |
$ 10,043,898
|
9,620,815
|
7,425,259
|
7,652,216
|
4,068,566
|
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote |
(2) |
The calculation of CAP requires that we make adjustments to amounts previously reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the five years presented. The SEC’s valuation and calculation methods for CAP differ from those required in the Summary Compensation Table. The table below summarizes compensation values presented in the Summary Compensation Table and the adjusted values required to reconcile these values to the CAP presented above. The amounts shown below for Non-PEO NEOs represents an average of all Non-PEO NEOs. CAP to the PEO and Non-PEO NEOs represents Summary Compensation Table total compensation adjusted by the following amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Compensation Table Total to CAP Reconciliation (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Compensation Table Total (b) |
|
Change in Pension Value Deduction (c) |
|
Less Fair Value of Equity Awards Reported in the Summary Compensation Table in the Covered Year |
|
Plus Fair Value of Covered Year Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End |
|
Change in Fair Value of Prior Years’ Equity Awards Unvested at Fiscal Year-End |
|
Change in Fair Value of Prior Years’ Equity Awards Vested in the Covered Year |
|
Less Fair Value of Prior Year Awards Forfeited in the Covered Year (d) |
|
Plus Fair Value of Incremental Dividends or Earnings on Stock Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PEO 2024 |
|
|
|
$30,829,070 |
|
|
|
|
$(12,143) |
|
|
|
|
$(25,206,709) |
|
|
|
|
$32,092,806 |
|
|
|
|
$14,835,622 |
|
|
|
|
$2,715,253 |
|
|
|
|
$— |
|
|
|
|
$1,136,255 |
|
|
|
|
$56,390,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEOs 2024 |
|
|
|
$7,434,305 |
|
|
|
|
$— |
|
|
|
|
$(3,443,874) |
|
|
|
|
$4,415,292 |
|
|
|
|
$1,181,753 |
|
|
|
|
$346,736 |
|
|
|
|
$— |
|
|
|
|
$109,686 |
|
|
|
|
$10,043,898 |
|
|
(a) |
Fair values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 as of the end of the fiscal year, other than awards that vest in the covered year, which are valued as of the applicable vesting dates. There were no awards granted in each of the covered years that vested in the same year. |
|
(b) |
Reflects the total compensation amount reported in the Summary Compensation Table the year shown. |
|
(c) |
Reflects the aggregate change in pension value for all defined benefit plans. There are no service costs or prior service costs associated with pension benefits since the Cash Balance Pension Plan and the Excess Cash Balance Pension Plan are frozen. |
|
(d) |
Reflects awards that failed to meet vesting conditions during the covered year. |
|
(e) |
Reflects the actual CAP for the PEO and average CAP for the Non-PEO NEOs. |
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return |
As shown in the chart above, the PEO and other NEO’s CAP amounts are aligned with the Company’s TSR. This alignment is due to the Company’s executive compensation program being composed of primarily equity, with 50% of PEO and approximately 84% of all Non-PEO NEO’s total compensation for the 2024 performance year being comprised of equity-based compensation, similar to prior years. In addition, a portion of PEO compensation is directly linked to the Company’s TSR and vests entirely on the Company’s TSR performance relative to the Performance Share Peers over a three-year period.
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income |
As shown in the chart above, the Company’s net income has varied over the measurement period. While net income has increased and decreased directionally with PEO and other NEO CAP for certain years in the performance period, the changes are not proportionally correlated with CAP. This is due in large part to the large portion of PEO and other NEO compensation that is equity-based compensation as well as the significant volatility of GAAP net income that resulted from the pandemic and post-pandemic periods of economic volatility that were covered by a portion of the measurement period. In addition, while net income is one of several factors used to assess Company performance, the Company does not use net income as a primary metric to determine compensation levels or incentive plan payout.
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure |
As shown in the chart above, the PEO and other NEO’s CAP amounts are aligned with the Company selected measure of D+TBV. This alignment is partially due to a large portion of PEO and other NEO compensation being comprised of Financial Performance Shares (as described on page 79). For the 2024 performance year, 54% of PEO total compensation and an average of 27% of other NEO total compensation was granted in the form of Financial Performance Shares, similar to prior years. For Financial Performance Shares taken into consideration in the calculation of CAP, two-thirds of the payout of each Financial Performance Share upon vesting is based on D+TBV for the years covered in the chart above.
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group |
Company TSR versus Peer Group TSR As shown in the chart above, the TSR peer group is based on the S&P Financial Index, which reflects the Company’s industry sector. The Company’s cumulative TSR was above that of the S&P Financial Index during the period covered by the table above. The financial services industry faced challenges and volatility over the measured period including a pandemic-driven economic downturn, substantial changes in interest rates, regional bank failures and the resulting bank funding stress. Strong liquidity, the stability of Capital One’s insured deposit base, the strength of our credit performance relative to peers, and investor confidence in our results and our future buoyed our stock price and balance sheet strength.
|
|
|
|
|
Tabular List, Table |
|
∎ |
|
D+TBV rewards strong operational results, balanced stewardship of capital, and long-term stockholder value creation by measuring the value distributed to stockholders (common dividends per share) and the growth of company value created for common stockholders (tangible book value per common share). |
|
∎ |
|
D+TBV is calculated as the average of the ratios, expressed as a percentage, of (i) the Company’s tangible book value per common share at the end of each year within the performance period, plus total common dividends per share paid during such year, to (ii) the Company’s tangible book value per common share at the beginning of each corresponding year within the performance period. |
|
∎ |
|
Adjusted ROTCE rewards balanced capital management and stewardship while capturing current and historical business performance and profitability as compared to the size of our stockholders’ investment in the Company. ROTCE is broadly used in banking as a key performance indicator and component in peer executive compensation programs. |
|
∎ |
|
Adjusted ROTCE is calculated as the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of (i) the Company’s net income available to common stockholders, excluding, on a tax-adjusted basis, the impact of impairment, amortization and re-measurement of intangible assets, to (ii) the Company’s average tangible common equity. |
|
∎ |
|
Net revenue, and the growth of net revenue, reflects the Company’s ability to grow new customer relationships, deepen existing relationships, and expand into new businesses and areas of focus and market opportunity. Net revenue serves as the key driver for long-term earnings power and requires delivery of compelling products and experiences as well as a sustainable, through-cycle pricing strategy and business model. |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholder Return Amount |
$ 189.44
|
137.03
|
94.95
|
145.28
|
97.32
|
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount |
173.9
|
133.2
|
118.77
|
132.75
|
98.31
|
Net Income (Loss) |
$ 4,750,000,000
|
$ 4,887,000,000
|
$ 7,360,000,000
|
$ 12,390,000,000
|
$ 2,714,000,000
|
Company Selected Measure Amount |
9.6
|
18.7
|
(11.3)
|
15.8
|
6.7
|
PEO Name |
Mr. Fairbank
|
|
|
|
|
Measure:: 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
D+TBV
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP Measure Description |
D+TBV is a non-GAAP metric. D+TBV is calculated as the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of (i) the Company’s tangible book value per share at the end of each year, plus total common dividends per share paid during such year, to (ii) the Company’s tangible book value per share at the beginning of each corresponding year.
|
|
|
|
|
Measure:: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
Adjusted ROTCE
|
|
|
|
|
Measure:: 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
Net Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
PEO | Aggregate Change in Present Value of Accumulated Benefit for All Pension Plans Reported in Summary Compensation Table |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
$ (12,143)
|
|
|
|
|
PEO | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
(25,206,709)
|
|
|
|
|
PEO | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
32,092,806
|
|
|
|
|
PEO | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
14,835,622
|
|
|
|
|
PEO | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
2,715,253
|
|
|
|
|
PEO | Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Total Compensation for Covered Year |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
1,136,255
|
|
|
|
|
Non-PEO NEO | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
(3,443,874)
|
|
|
|
|
Non-PEO NEO | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
4,415,292
|
|
|
|
|
Non-PEO NEO | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
1,181,753
|
|
|
|
|
Non-PEO NEO | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
346,736
|
|
|
|
|
Non-PEO NEO | Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Total Compensation for Covered Year |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
$ 109,686
|
|
|
|
|