UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number: 1-11238
NYMAGIC, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
New York
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
13-3534162
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
919 Third Avenue
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
10022
(Zip Code)
|
212 551-0600
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
submit and post such files).
Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the
definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting
company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at November 1, 2010
|
|
Common Stock, $1.00 par value per share
|
|
8,499,513 shares
|
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains certain forward-looking statements concerning the Companys
operations, economic performance and financial condition, including, in particular, the
likelihood of the Companys success in developing and expanding its business. Any
forward-looking statements concerning the Companys operations, economic performance and
financial condition contained herein, including statements related to the outlook for the
Companys performance in 2010 and beyond, are made under the safe harbor provisions of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based upon a
number of assumptions and estimates which inherently are subject to uncertainties and
contingencies, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. Some of these
assumptions may not materialize and unanticipated events may occur which could cause
actual results to differ materially from such statements. These include, but are not
limited to, the failure of the Company to close its pending merger with ProSight
Specialty Insurance Holdings, Inc., the cyclical nature of the insurance and reinsurance
industry, premium rates, investment results, hedge fund results, the estimation of loss
reserves and loss reserve development, uncertainties associated with asbestos and
environmental claims, including difficulties with assessing latent injuries and the
impact of litigation settlements, bankruptcies and potential legislation, the uncertainty
surrounding the losses related to the attacks of September 11, 2001, and those associated
with catastrophic hurricanes, the occurrence and effects of wars and acts of terrorism,
net loss retention, the effect of competition, the ability to collect reinsurance
receivables and the timing of such collections, the availability and cost of reinsurance,
the possibility that the outcome of any litigation or arbitration proceeding is
unfavorable, the ability to pay dividends, regulatory changes, changes in the ratings
assigned to the Company by rating agencies, failure to retain key personnel, the
possibility that our relationship with Mariner Partners, Inc. could terminate or change,
and the fact that ownership of our common stock is concentrated among a few major
stockholders and is subject to the voting agreement, as well as assumptions underlying
any of the foregoing and are generally expressed with words such as intends, intend,
intended, believes, estimates, expects, anticipates, plans, projects,
forecasts, goals, could have, may have and similar expressions. These risks could
cause actual results for the 2010 year and beyond to differ materially from those
expressed in any forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to
update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements.
Item 1.
Financial Statements
NYMAGIC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity at adjusted amortized cost (fair value $52,573,853 and
$59,327,813)
|
|
$
|
52,483,006
|
|
|
$
|
56,589,704
|
|
Available for sale at fair value (amortized cost $18,926,409 and $385,378,334)
|
|
|
19,258,656
|
|
|
|
386,519,408
|
|
Equity securities available for sale at fair value (cost $101,780 and $117,968)
|
|
|
101,780
|
|
|
|
117,968
|
|
Commercial loans at fair value (amortized cost $6,299,314 and $7,738,677)
|
|
|
3,018,117
|
|
|
|
5,001,118
|
|
Limited partnerships at equity (cost $116,319,546 and $127,379,526)
|
|
|
132,222,970
|
|
|
|
151,891,838
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
13,900,340
|
|
|
|
8,788,718
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
420,350,759
|
|
|
|
66,755,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and investments
|
|
|
641,335,628
|
|
|
|
675,664,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
323,856
|
|
|
|
3,365,535
|
|
Premiums and other receivables, net
|
|
|
30,021,257
|
|
|
|
24,753,976
|
|
Receivable for investments disposed
|
|
|
51,845,890
|
|
|
|
4,221,356
|
|
Reinsurance receivables on unpaid losses, net
|
|
|
181,212,201
|
|
|
|
205,077,080
|
|
Reinsurance receivables on paid losses, net
|
|
|
25,097,392
|
|
|
|
13,116,607
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
21,302,824
|
|
|
|
16,438,088
|
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
|
|
|
21,095,472
|
|
|
|
19,643,170
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
29,097,197
|
|
|
|
29,251,550
|
|
Property, improvements and equipment, net
|
|
|
4,967,512
|
|
|
|
14,602,141
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
7,607,191
|
|
|
|
4,074,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,013,906,420
|
|
|
$
|
1,010,208,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
$
|
538,252,703
|
|
|
$
|
555,485,502
|
|
Reserve for unearned premiums
|
|
|
109,614,222
|
|
|
|
89,458,244
|
|
Ceded reinsurance payable
|
|
|
14,833,012
|
|
|
|
13,580,535
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
Dividends payable
|
|
|
1,185,029
|
|
|
|
737,308
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
27,717,805
|
|
|
|
34,937,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
791,602,771
|
|
|
|
794,198,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
15,833,490
|
|
|
|
15,796,465
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
54,187,320
|
|
|
|
51,699,572
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(21,353,928
|
)
|
|
|
(22,977,781
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
261,673,358
|
|
|
|
259,527,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310,340,240
|
|
|
|
304,046,223
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 7,333,977 shares
|
|
|
(88,036,591
|
)
|
|
|
(88,036,591
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
222,303,649
|
|
|
|
216,009,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,013,906,420
|
|
|
$
|
1,010,208,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
- 2 -
NYMAGIC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
$
|
136,616,078
|
|
|
$
|
117,676,922
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
7,640,954
|
|
|
|
15,365,438
|
|
Equity in earnings of limited partnerships
|
|
|
12,605,833
|
|
|
|
18,955,203
|
|
Net realized investment gains
|
|
|
7,207,898
|
|
|
|
2,320,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other-than-temporary impairments
|
|
|
(300,199
|
)
|
|
|
(478,407
|
)
|
Portion of loss recognized in OCI (before taxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings
|
|
|
(300,199
|
)
|
|
|
(478,407
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (loss) income, net
|
|
|
(8,069,072
|
)
|
|
|
3,439,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
155,701,492
|
|
|
|
157,278,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred
|
|
|
83,846,049
|
|
|
|
57,843,159
|
|
Policy acquisition expenses
|
|
|
32,076,067
|
|
|
|
26,899,347
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
35,511,326
|
|
|
|
30,876,796
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
5,101,160
|
|
|
|
5,047,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
156,534,602
|
|
|
|
120,666,571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(833,110
|
)
|
|
|
36,611,920
|
|
Income tax provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
(4,917,883
|
)
|
|
|
4,712,535
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(720,031
|
)
|
|
|
(357,982
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(5,637,914
|
)
|
|
|
4,354,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
4,804,804
|
|
|
$
|
32,257,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding-basic
|
|
|
8,490,509
|
|
|
|
8,422,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
.57
|
|
|
$
|
3.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding-diluted
|
|
|
8,814,282
|
|
|
|
8,624,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
.55
|
|
|
$
|
3.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share
|
|
$
|
.30
|
|
|
$
|
.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
- 3 -
NYMAGIC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
$
|
47,335,512
|
|
|
$
|
38,506,255
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
85,903
|
|
|
|
3,792,061
|
|
Equity in earnings of limited partnerships
|
|
|
5,734,440
|
|
|
|
10,785,876
|
|
Net realized investment gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
545,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other-than-temporary impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion of loss recognized in OCI (before taxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (loss) income, net
|
|
|
(8,154,688
|
)
|
|
|
3,311,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
45,001,167
|
|
|
|
56,941,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred
|
|
|
31,363,254
|
|
|
|
19,831,468
|
|
Policy acquisition expenses
|
|
|
11,449,707
|
|
|
|
9,072,957
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
12,655,086
|
|
|
|
10,398,637
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,730,044
|
|
|
|
1,683,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
57,198,091
|
|
|
|
40,986,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(12,196,924
|
)
|
|
|
15,955,214
|
|
Income tax provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
(652,353
|
)
|
|
|
4,353,745
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(2,618,192
|
)
|
|
|
(2,973,658
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(3,270,545
|
)
|
|
|
1,380,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(8,926,379
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,575,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding-basic
|
|
|
8,499,573
|
|
|
|
8,431,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(1.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding-diluted
|
|
|
8,499,573
|
|
|
|
8,657,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(1.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share
|
|
$
|
.10
|
|
|
$
|
.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
- 4 -
NYMAGIC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Cash flows (used in) provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
4,804,804
|
|
|
$
|
32,257,367
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for deferred taxes
|
|
|
(720,031
|
)
|
|
|
(357,982
|
)
|
Net realized investment gain
|
|
|
(7,207,898
|
)
|
|
|
(2,320,323
|
)
|
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings
|
|
|
300,199
|
|
|
|
478,407
|
|
Equity in earnings of limited partnerships
|
|
|
(12,143,046
|
)
|
|
|
(20,492,356
|
)
|
Net amortization from bonds and commercial loans
|
|
|
(55,183
|
)
|
|
|
821,888
|
|
Depreciation and other, net
|
|
|
958,621
|
|
|
|
1,024,857
|
|
Trading portfolio activities
|
|
|
3,198
|
|
|
|
29,217,972
|
|
Commercial loan activities
|
|
|
2,019,817
|
|
|
|
(1,615,100
|
)
|
Loss on abandonment of computer equipment and software
|
|
|
8,176,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and other receivables
|
|
|
(5,267,281
|
)
|
|
|
(5,029,248
|
)
|
Reinsurance receivables paid and unpaid, net
|
|
|
11,884,094
|
|
|
|
13,248,570
|
|
Ceded reinsurance payable
|
|
|
1,252,477
|
|
|
|
(236,064
|
)
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
3,041,679
|
|
|
|
1,558,475
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
(4,864,736
|
)
|
|
|
(2,425,142
|
)
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
|
|
|
(1,452,302
|
)
|
|
|
(3,862,221
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(3,532,766
|
)
|
|
|
18,492,809
|
|
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
(17,232,799
|
)
|
|
|
10,015,374
|
|
Reserve for unearned premiums
|
|
|
20,155,978
|
|
|
|
12,177,356
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(7,219,564
|
)
|
|
|
6,862,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
(11,903,318
|
)
|
|
|
57,559,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(7,098,514
|
)
|
|
|
89,817,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity fixed maturities matured, repaid and redeemed
|
|
|
7,461,777
|
|
|
|
6,712,876
|
|
Available for sale fixed maturities acquired
|
|
|
(345,751,451
|
)
|
|
|
(423,889,045
|
)
|
Available for sale fixed maturities sold
|
|
|
719,040,449
|
|
|
|
264,735,655
|
|
Available for sale equity securities sold
|
|
|
53,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributed to limited partnerships
|
|
|
(45,929,970
|
)
|
|
|
(27,235,000
|
)
|
Distributions and redemptions from limited partnerships
|
|
|
77,741,891
|
|
|
|
11,856,894
|
|
Net purchase of short-term investments
|
|
|
(5,111,622
|
)
|
|
|
45,254,806
|
|
Receivable for investments disposed and not yet settled
|
|
|
(47,624,534
|
)
|
|
|
23,843,597
|
|
Payable for securities not yet settled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,445,700
|
|
Acquisition of property & equipment, net
|
|
|
499,783
|
|
|
|
(4,759,347
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
360,380,283
|
|
|
|
(98,033,864
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock issuance and other
|
|
|
2,524,773
|
|
|
|
1,569,104
|
|
Cash dividends paid to stockholders
|
|
|
(2,211,692
|
)
|
|
|
(1,133,072
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
313,081
|
|
|
|
436,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
353,594,850
|
|
|
|
(7,780,647
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
66,755,909
|
|
|
|
75,672,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
420,350,759
|
|
|
$
|
67,891,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
6,542,867
|
|
|
$
|
6,501,388
|
|
Net federal income tax received
|
|
$
|
100,763
|
|
|
$
|
9,148,020
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
- 5 -
(1) Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies
Basis of presentation
The interim consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and are unaudited. In the opinion of
management, all material adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of results have
been reflected for such periods. Adjustments to financial statements consist of normal
recurring items. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily
indicative of results for the full year. These financial statements and related notes
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and claims and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Beginning in the third quarter of 2010, the Company presents the equity in earnings of
partnership separately from net investment income on the income statement.
Adoption of new accounting pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing (ASC 860). ASC 860
amends the derecognition guidance in Statement 140 and eliminates the concept of
qualifying special-purpose entities (QSPEs). ACS 860 is effective for fiscal years and
interim periods beginning after November 15, 2009. Early adoption of ASC 860 was
prohibited. The Company adopted ASC 860 during the first quarter of 2010 and the adoption
did not have an effect on its results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 810, (ASC 810), which amends the consolidation
guidance applicable to variable interest entities (VIE). An entity would consolidate a
VIE, as the primary beneficiary, when the entity has both of the following
characteristics: (a) The power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly
impact the entitys economic performance and (b) The obligation to absorb losses of the
entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits
from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Ongoing reassessment of
whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE is required. ASC 810 amends
interpretation 46(R) to eliminate the quantitative approach previously required for
determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE. This Statement is effective for fiscal
years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company adopted ASC 810
during the first quarter of 2010 and the adoption did not have an effect on its results
of operations, financial position or liquidity.
In June 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09,
Amendments to Certain Recognition and
Disclosure Requirements.
ASU 2010-09 is an amendment of ASC 855,
Subsequent Events.
ASC
855 established that an entity should disclose the date through which subsequent events
have been evaluated. ASU 2010-09 amends ASC 855 to state that an SEC filer is not
required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. The
Company adopted ASU 2010-09 during the third quarter of 2010 and the adoption did not
have an effect on its results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
Future adoption of new accounting pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06,
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements.
ASU 2010-06 is an amendment of ASC 820,
Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures.
ASU 2010-06 provides additional disclosures for transfers in and out of the
Levels I and II and for activity in Level III as well as clarifies certain existing
disclosure requirements including level of desegregation and disclosures around inputs
and valuation techniques. The final amendments to ASU 2010-06 were effective for annual
and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the
requirement to provide the Level 3 activity for purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements on a gross basis. That requirement will be effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The
Company adopted ASU 2010-06 during the first quarter of 2010 and the adoption did not
have an effect on its results of operations, financial position or liquidity. The portion
of ASU 2010-06 that has not yet been adopted is not expected to have a material impact on
our Companys financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
In October 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-26,
Financial Services Insurance (Topic 944):
Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts.
ASU 2010-26
clarifies the definition of acquisition costs that are eligible for deferral. Acquisition
costs are to include only those costs that are directly related to the successful
acquisition or renewal of insurance contracts; incremental direct costs of contract
acquisition that are incurred in transactions with either independent third parties or
employees; and advertising costs meeting the capitalization criteria for direct-response
advertising. This guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2011, and interim periods within those years. This guidance may be applied prospectively
upon the date of adoption, with retrospective application permitted, but not required. Early
adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt this guidance in the first quarter of 2012.
The Company has not yet determined the impact adoption will have on its results of
operations, financial position or liquidity.
- 6 -
(2) Investments:
A summary of the Companys investment portfolio components at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities held to maturity (adjusted
amortized cost):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
52,483,006
|
|
|
|
8.18
|
%
|
|
$
|
56,589,704
|
|
|
|
8.37
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities held to maturity
|
|
$
|
52,483,006
|
|
|
|
8.18
|
%
|
|
$
|
56,589,704
|
|
|
|
8.37
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale (fair value):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$
|
18,434,108
|
|
|
|
2.87
|
%
|
|
$
|
385,715,035
|
|
|
|
57.09
|
%
|
Municipal obligations
|
|
|
824,548
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
%
|
|
|
804,373
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities available for sale
|
|
$
|
19,258,656
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
386,519,408
|
|
|
|
57.21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities
|
|
$
|
71,741,662
|
|
|
|
11.18
|
%
|
|
$
|
443,109,112
|
|
|
|
65.58
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities available for sale (fair value):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
$
|
101,780
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
$
|
117,968
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities
|
|
$
|
101,780
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
$
|
117,968
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
|
|
$
|
434,251,099
|
|
|
|
67.71
|
%
|
|
$
|
75,544,627
|
|
|
|
11.18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities, equity securities, cash,
cash equivalents and short-term investments
|
|
$
|
506,094,541
|
|
|
|
78.91
|
%
|
|
$
|
518,771,707
|
|
|
|
76.78
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans (fair value)
|
|
$
|
3,018,117
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,001,118
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
%
|
Limited partnership hedge funds (equity)
|
|
$
|
132,222,970
|
|
|
|
20.62
|
%
|
|
$
|
151,891,838
|
|
|
|
22.48
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment portfolio
|
|
$
|
641,335,628
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
675,664,663
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010, 92.1% of the Companys fixed income and short-term
investment portfolios were considered investment grade by S&P.
Short-term investments, which have maturity of one year or less from the date of
purchase, are carried at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. The Company
considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three
months or less to be cash equivalents. The Companys investment in limited partnerships
at equity include hedge fund interests in limited partnerships and limited liability
companies.
Pursuant to certain
covenants in the Agreement and Plan of Merger with ProSight Specialty Insurance
Holdings, Inc., dated July 15, 2010, the Company has submitted redemption
notices for all of its hedge fund investments except for its investment in
Tiptree Financial Partners, LP.
The Company’s investment in
Tiptree Financial Partners, LP is valued at approximately $35 million at
September 30, 2010. During the quarter, Tiptree Financial Partners, LP
completed the acquisition of an entity for which the initial acquisition
accounting is not yet completed. While the Company believes the purchase price
approximates the fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities
assumed, the ultimate valuation of such assets and liabilities, including
intangibles, which is still in process, may result in the recording of goodwill
or a gain on bargain purchase.
- 7 -
Details of the residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) portfolio as of September
30, 2010, including publicly available qualitative information, are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan to
|
|
|
FICO
|
|
|
D60+
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
S&P
|
|
|
Moodys
|
|
Security
|
|
|
|
|
|
amortized cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value %
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
Delinquency
|
|
|
Support
|
|
|
Rating
|
|
|
Rating
|
|
description
|
|
Issue date
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
Score (2)
|
|
|
Rate (3)
|
|
|
Level (4)
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
AHMA 2006-3
|
|
|
7/2006
|
|
|
$
|
10,457,012
|
|
|
$
|
9,707,649
|
|
|
|
84.8
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
|
|
35.3
|
|
|
AA
|
|
Caa1
|
CWALT 2005-69
|
|
|
11/2005
|
|
|
|
6,677,549
|
|
|
|
6,077,223
|
|
|
|
80.1
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
55.3
|
|
|
|
47.6
|
|
|
CCC
|
|
Ba3
|
CWALT 2005-76
|
|
|
12/2005
|
|
|
|
6,605,873
|
|
|
|
6,341,236
|
|
|
|
81.4
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
|
47.1
|
|
|
CCC
|
|
B2
|
RALI 2005-QO3
|
|
|
10/2005
|
|
|
|
7,042,417
|
|
|
|
5,525,030
|
|
|
|
80.2
|
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
43.2
|
|
|
|
38.3
|
|
|
|
B-
|
|
|
B1
|
WaMu 2005-AR17
|
|
|
12/2005
|
|
|
|
5,688,359
|
|
|
|
6,976,057
|
|
|
|
72.4
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
29.2
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
A1
|
WaMu 2006-AR9
|
|
|
7/2006
|
|
|
|
7,842,748
|
|
|
|
8,649,699
|
|
|
|
73.7
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
33.4
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
Ba1
|
WaMu 2006-AR13
|
|
|
9/2006
|
|
|
|
8,169,048
|
|
|
|
9,296,959
|
|
|
|
75.1
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
|
|
|
22.9
|
|
|
CCC
|
|
B3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,483,006
|
|
|
$
|
52,573,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The dollar-weighted average amortized loan-to-original value of the underlying loans at
October 25, 2010.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Average FICO credit score at origination of remaining borrowers in the loan pool at October 25, 2010.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The percentage of the current outstanding principal balance that is more than 60 days
delinquent as of October 25, 2010. This includes loans that are in foreclosure and real estate
owned.
|
|
(4)
|
|
The current credit support provided by subordinate ranking tranches within the overall
security structure at October 25, 2010.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Ratings as of October 25, 2010.
|
|
(6)
|
|
After OTTI recognized in OCI.
|
The Companys cash flow analysis for each of these securities attempts to estimate
the likelihood of any future impairment. While the Company does not believe there are any
other than temporary impairments (OTTI) currently, future estimates may change
depending upon the actual performance statistics reported for each security to the
Company. This may result in future charges based upon revised estimates for delinquency
rates, severity rates or prepayment patterns. These changes in estimates may be material.
These securities are collateralized by pools of Alt-A mortgages, and receive priority
payments from these pools. The Companys securities rank senior to subordinated tranches
of debt collateralized by each respective pool of mortgages. The Company has collected
all applicable interest and principal repayments on such securities to date. As of
October 25, 2010, the levels of subordination ranged from 22.5% to 49.3% of the total
debt outstanding for each pool. Delinquencies within the underlying mortgage pools ranged
from 29.2% to 55.3% of total amounts outstanding. For comparison purposes, as of
October 25, 2009, delinquencies ranged from 28.7% to 51.1%, while subordination levels
ranged from 25.7% to 51.0%. Delinquency rates are not the same as severity rates, or
actual loss, but are an indication of the potential for losses of some degree in future
periods.
The fair value of each RMBS investment is based on the framework established in ASC 820
(See Note 3). Fair value is determined by estimating the price at which an asset might be
sold on the measurement date. There has been a considerable amount of turmoil in the U.S.
housing market since 2007, which has led to market declines in the Companys RMBS
securities. Because the pricing of these investments is complex and has many variables
affecting price including, projected delinquency rates, projected severity rates,
estimated loan to value ratios, vintage year, subordination levels, projected prepayment
speeds and expected rates of return required by prospective purchasers, the estimated
price of such securities will differ among brokers depending on these facts and
assumptions. While many of the inputs utilized in pricing are observable, many other
inputs are unobservable and will vary depending upon the broker. During periods of market
dislocation, such as current market conditions, it is increasingly difficult to value
such investments because trading becomes less frequent and/or market data becomes less
observable. As a result, valuations may include inputs and assumptions that are less
observable or require greater estimation and judgment as well as valuation methods that
are more complex. For example, assumptions regarding projected delinquency and severity
rates have become very pessimistic due to uncertainties associated with the residential
real estate markets. Additionally, there are only a limited number of prospective
purchasers of such securities and such purchasers generally demand high expected returns
in the current market. This has resulted in lower quotes from securities dealers, who
are, themselves, reluctant to position such securities because of financing
uncertainties. Accordingly, the dealer quotes used to establish fair value may not be
reflective of the expected future cash flows from a security and, therefore, not
reflective of its intrinsic value.
- 8 -
As of September 30, 2010, there was no significant variance in RMBS securities prices
from different pricing sources. Accordingly, the Company determined fair value using
prices obtained from its custodian. From September 30, 2009 to
June 30, 2010, there was variance in RMBS securities prices from different pricing sources, therefore, the Company determined fair
value using a matrix pricing analysis.
There are government sponsored programs that may affect the performance of the Companys
RMBS. Further there has been recent moratoriums on foreclosures and extensive litigation
regarding placing mortgages back to the originators, The Company is uncertain as to the
impact, if any, these programs or events will have on the fair value of the Companys
RMBS. The fair value of such securities at September 30, 2010 was approximately
$52.6 million.
The gross unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturities held to maturity and available
for sale at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTTI
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
In OCI (a)
|
|
|
(after OTTI)
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
RMBS
|
|
$
|
85,667,249
|
|
|
$
|
(33,184,243
|
)
|
|
$
|
52,483,006
|
|
|
$
|
3,222,560
|
|
|
$
|
(3,131,713
|
)
|
|
$
|
52,573,853
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities available for sale
|
|
|
18,185,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,185,942
|
|
|
|
248,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,434,108
|
|
Municipal obligations available for sale
|
|
|
740,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
740,467
|
|
|
|
84,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
824,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
104,593,658
|
|
|
$
|
(33,184,243
|
)
|
|
$
|
71,409,415
|
|
|
$
|
3,554,807
|
|
|
$
|
(3,131,713
|
)
|
|
$
|
71,832,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTTI
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
In OCI (a)
|
|
|
(after OTTI)
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
RMBS
|
|
$
|
93,081,210
|
|
|
$
|
(36,491,506
|
)
|
|
$
|
56,589,704
|
|
|
$
|
5,077,950
|
|
|
$
|
(2,339,841
|
)
|
|
$
|
59,327,813
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities available for sale
|
|
|
384,638,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384,638,048
|
|
|
|
1,317,809
|
|
|
|
(240,822
|
)
|
|
|
385,715,035
|
|
Municipal obligations available for sale
|
|
|
740,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
740,286
|
|
|
|
64,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
804,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
478,459,544
|
|
|
$
|
(36,491,506
|
)
|
|
$
|
441,968,038
|
|
|
$
|
6,459,846
|
|
|
$
|
(2,580,663
|
)
|
|
$
|
445,847,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Effective April 1, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard resulting in a
reclassification in the amount of $40.1 million of non-credit investment impairment losses
previously recognized on the Companys RMBS holdings that are currently being held to
maturity. These securities are categorized as non-credit based on the Companys impairment
analysis. The Company is accreting from OCI to the amortized cost of the RMBS over their
remaining life in a prospective manner on the basis of the amount and timing of future cash
flows. The amount of the accretion was $3.3 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010. The amount of accretion for the period April 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009 was
$3.7 million.
|
- 9 -
Net investment income from each major category of investments for the periods
indicated is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Fixed maturities held to maturity
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Investment expenses
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
7.6
|
|
|
$
|
15.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Details related to investment income from commercial loans and trading activities
presented in the preceding table are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Interest and dividends earned
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
Net realized gains (losses)
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
Net unrealized (depreciation) appreciation
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income from commercial
loans and trading activities
|
|
$
|
3.4
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 10 -
The following tables summarize all fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss
position at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, disclosing the aggregate fair value
and gross unrealized loss for less than as well as more than 12 months:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
|
12 months or longer
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
mortgage-backed
securities held to
maturity
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,573,853
|
|
|
$
|
(33,093,396
|
)
|
|
$
|
52,573,853
|
|
|
$
|
(33,093,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily
impaired securities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,573,853
|
|
|
$
|
(33,093,396
|
)
|
|
$
|
52,573,853
|
|
|
$
|
(33,093,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
|
12 months or longer
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
mortgage-backed
securities held to
maturity
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
59,327,813
|
|
|
$
|
(33,753,397
|
)
|
|
$
|
59,327,813
|
|
|
$
|
(33,753,397
|
)
|
U.S. Treasury Securities
|
|
|
198,588,058
|
|
|
|
(240,822
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,588,058
|
|
|
|
(240,822
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily
impaired securities
|
|
$
|
198,588,058
|
|
|
|
(240,822
|
)
|
|
$
|
59,327,813
|
|
|
$
|
(33,753,397
|
)
|
|
$
|
257,915,871
|
|
|
$
|
(33,994,219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2010, the Company was holding seven fixed maturity securities that
were in an unrealized loss position. The Company believes these unrealized losses are
temporary, as they resulted from changes in market conditions, including interest rates
or sector spreads, and are not considered to be credit risk related. The Company does not
intend to sell nor does it expect to be required to sell the securities outlined above.
The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities that are not included in the
Companys commercial loan portfolio at September 30, 2010 are shown below by contractual
maturity. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities, because borrowers
may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment
penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
15,864,433
|
|
|
$
|
15,956,866
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
2,321,509
|
|
|
|
2,477,242
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
482,492
|
|
|
|
528,505
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
257,975
|
|
|
|
296,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
18,926,409
|
|
|
|
19,258,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
52,483,006
|
|
|
|
52,573,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
71,409,415
|
|
|
$
|
71,832,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 11 -
The components for net realized gains (losses) for the nine months ended September
30, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains (losses) on investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities gains
|
|
$
|
7,424,553
|
|
|
$
|
4,830,332
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,035,485
|
|
Equity securities gains
|
|
|
37,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities losses
|
|
|
(254,427
|
)
|
|
|
(2,378,981
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(496,513
|
)
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131,028
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains before impairments
|
|
|
7,207,898
|
|
|
|
2,320,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
545,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities impairments
|
|
|
(300,199
|
)
|
|
|
(478,407
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains after impairments
|
|
$
|
6,907,699
|
|
|
$
|
1,841,916
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
545,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from redemptions in investments held to maturity or disposals of fixed
income investments available for sale for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009 were $726,502,226 and $271,448,477, respectively.
The OTTI of $300,199 recognized for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 resulted
from the Companys intention to sell certain U.S. Treasury securities under circumstances
in which those securities are not expected to recover their entire amortized cost prior
to sale. The Company recorded declines in values of investments considered to be OTTI of
$478,407 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, resulting from the Companys
intention to sell certain municipal securities whereby those securities were not expected
to recover their entire amortized cost prior to sale.
The Company maintains a portfolio of municipal bonds that has an average S&P rating of
AAA. The average S&P rating includes certain municipal bonds that carry the benefit of
insurance that provides credit enhancement. Excluding the benefit of this credit
enhancement, the portfolio of municipal bonds has an average underlying S&P rating of A+.
The Company purchases municipal bonds with the intent to rely upon the underlying credit
rating of the security exclusive of the credit enhancement provided by any financial
guarantor.
The following table lists the financial guarantors, as well as the average S&P ratings
and the average underlying S&P ratings, excluding the impact of credit enhancement, of
the guaranteed municipal bonds in our investment portfolio in which there are a total of
two municipal securities with a fair value of approximately $825,000 containing credit
enhancements. The Company does not have any investments directly in the following
financial guarantors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
S&P
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Financial Guarantors
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Rating
|
|
|
Rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
AAA
|
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corporation
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
AA+
|
|
BBB-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 12 -
(3) Fair Value Measurements:
The Companys estimates of fair value for financial assets and financial liabilities are
based on the framework established in ASC 820. The framework is based on the inputs used
in valuation and gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and
requires that observable inputs be used in the valuations when available. The disclosure
of fair value estimates in the ASC 820 hierarchy is based on whether the significant
inputs into the valuation are observable. In determining the level of the hierarchy in
which the estimate is disclosed, the highest priority is given to unadjusted quoted
prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs that reflect the
Companys significant market assumptions. The standard describes three levels of inputs
that may be used to measure fair value and categorize the assets and liabilities within
the hierarchy:
Level 1
Fair value is based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are
accessible to the Company for identical assets or liabilities. These prices generally
provide the most reliable evidence and are used to measure fair value whenever available.
Active markets are defined as having the following for the measured asset/liability: i)
many transactions, ii) current prices, iii) price quotes not varying substantially among
market makers, iv) narrow bid/ask spreads and v) most information publicly available.
The Companys Level 1 assets are comprised of U.S. Treasury securities, which are highly
liquid and traded in active exchange markets.
The Company uses the quoted market prices as fair value for assets classified as Level 1.
The Company receives quoted market prices from a third party, a nationally recognized
pricing service. Prices are obtained from available sources for market transactions
involving identical assets. For the majority of Level 1 investments, the Company receives
quoted market prices from an independent pricing service. The Company validates primary
source prices by back testing to trade data to confirm that the pricing services
significant inputs are observable. The Company also compares the prices received from the
third party service to other third party sources to validate the consistency of the
prices received on securities.
Level 2
Fair value is based on significant inputs, other than Level 1 inputs, that are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially
the full term of the asset through corroboration with observable market data. Level 2
inputs include quoted market prices in active markets for similar assets, non-binding
quotes in markets that are not active for identical or similar assets and other market
observable inputs (e.g., interest rates, yield curves, prepayment speeds, default rates
loss severities, etc.).
The Companys Level 2 assets include municipal debt obligations.
The Company generally obtains valuations from third party pricing services and/or
security dealers for identical or comparable assets or liabilities by obtaining
non-binding broker quotes (when pricing service information is not available) in order to
determine an estimate of fair value. The Company bases all of its estimates of fair value
for assets on the bid price as it represents what a third party market participant would
be willing to pay in an arms length transaction. Prices from pricing services are
validated by the Company through comparison to prices from corroborating sources and are
validated by back testing to trade data to confirm that the pricing services significant
inputs are observable. Under certain conditions, the Company may conclude the prices
received from independent third party pricing services or brokers are not reasonable or
reflective of market activity or that significant inputs are not observable, in which
case it may choose to over-ride the third-party pricing information or quotes received
and apply internally developed values to the related assets or liabilities. In such
cases, those valuations would be generally classified as Level 3. Generally, the Company
utilizes an independent pricing service to price its municipal debt obligations.
Currently, these securities are exhibiting low trade volume. The Company considers such
investments to be in the Level 2 category.
Level 3
Fair value is based on at least one or more significant unobservable inputs
that are supported by little or no market activity for the asset. These inputs reflect
the Companys understanding about the assumptions market participants would use in
pricing the asset or liability.
The Companys Level 3 assets include its RMBS, commercial loans and common stocks as they
are illiquid and trade in inactive markets. These markets are considered inactive as a
result of the low level of trades of such investments. The RMBS investments are not
considered within the Level 3 tabular disclosure, because they have been transferred to
held to maturity category effective October 1, 2008. Held to maturity investments are
not measured at fair value on a recurring basis and as such do not fall within the scope
of ASC 820. See Note 2, Investments for a complete discussion regarding the Companys
RMBS portfolio.
The primary pricing sources for the Companys commercial loan and common stock portfolios
are reviewed for reasonableness, based on the Companys understanding of the respective
market. Prices may then be determined using valuation methodologies such as discounted
cash flow models, as well as matrix pricing analyses performed on non-binding quotes from
brokers or other market-makers. As of September 30, 2010, the Company did not utilize an
alternate valuation methodology for its RMBS, commercial loan or common stock portfolios.
- 13 -
The following are the major categories of assets measured at fair value on a recurring
basis for the periods ended September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, using quoted prices
in active markets for identical assets (Level 1); significant other observable inputs
(Level 2); and significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Level 1:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in
|
|
|
Level 2:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Level 3:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Total at
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale
|
|
$
|
18,434,108
|
|
|
$
|
824,548
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,258,656
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,018,117
|
|
|
|
3,018,117
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,780
|
|
|
|
101,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
18,434,108
|
|
|
$
|
824,548
|
|
|
$
|
3,119,897
|
|
|
$
|
22,378,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Level 1:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in
|
|
|
Level 2:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Level 3:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Total at
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale
|
|
$
|
385,715,035
|
|
|
$
|
804,373
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
386,519,408
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,001,118
|
|
|
|
5,001,118
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,968
|
|
|
|
117,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
385,715,035
|
|
|
$
|
804,373
|
|
|
$
|
5,119,086
|
|
|
$
|
391,638,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 14 -
The investments classified as Level 3 in the above table consist of commercial loans
and common stock, for which the Company has determined that quoted market prices of
similar investments are not determinative of fair value. The following table presents a
reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for all investments measured at fair
value using Level 3 inputs during the nine months and three months ended September 30,
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Stocks
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Stocks
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
5,001,118
|
|
|
$
|
117,968
|
|
|
$
|
5,119,086
|
|
|
$
|
3,351,132
|
|
|
$
|
101,780
|
|
|
$
|
3,452,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains or losses
(realized/unrealized):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
(or changes in net
assets)
|
|
|
(517,862
|
)
|
|
|
37,772
|
|
|
|
(480,090
|
)
|
|
|
(485,114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(485,114
|
)
|
Included in other
comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, sales,
maturities, repayments,
redemptions and
amortization
|
|
|
(1,465,139
|
)
|
|
|
(53,960
|
)
|
|
|
(1,519,099
|
)
|
|
|
152,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers from Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers to Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
3,018,117
|
|
|
$
|
101,780
|
|
|
$
|
3,119,897
|
|
|
$
|
3,018,117
|
|
|
$
|
101,780
|
|
|
$
|
3,119,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management believes that the use of the fair value option to record commercial loan
purchases is consistent with its objective for such investments. As such, the entire
commercial loan portfolio, consisting of three securities valued at $3.0 million at
September 30, 2010 was recorded at fair value. All loans are current with respect to
interest payments. The Company also has one small common stock position at September 30,
2010, which was recorded at fair value.
(4) Income Taxes:
The Company files tax returns subject to the tax regulations of federal, state and local
tax authorities. A tax benefit taken in the tax return but not in the financial
statements is known as an unrecognized tax benefit. The Company had no unrecognized tax
benefits at either September 30, 2010 or September 30, 2009. The Companys policy is to
record interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits to income tax expense.
The Company did not incur any interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits
for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009.
At September 30, 2010, state net operating losses that can be carried forward are
$12,913,839. The range of years in which the state NOL carryforwards, which are primarily
in the State of New York, can be carried forward against future tax liabilities is from
2010 to 2029. At September 30, 2010, federal realized capital losses that can be carried
forward are $1,294,556. The range of years in which the federal capital loss
carryforwards can be carried forward is from 2010 to 2014. The estimate for federal
capital losses may differ from the actual amount ultimately filed in the Companys tax
return.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance of $4,960,384
with respect to the uncertainty in the realization of capital loss carryforwards. The
Company considered various tax planning strategies to support the recoverability of
existing deferred income taxes for capital loss carryforwards. This included an analysis
of the timing and availability of unrealized positions in the Companys investment
portfolio. Included in changes in the valuation allowance were tax benefits of $6,359,026
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as a result of the reversal of the deferred
tax valuation allowance previously provided for capital losses that are now considered
ordinary and a reversal of the deferred tax valuation resulting from sales of U.S.
Treasury securities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded
tax benefits of $5,924,398 as a result of the partial reversal of the deferred tax
valuation previously provided for capital losses. This resulted from capital gains
achieved within the investment portfolio. Management believes the deferred tax asset, net
of the recorded valuation allowance account, as of September 30, 2010 will
more-likely-than-not be fully realized.
- 15 -
The provision for federal income (benefit) expense is different from that which would be
obtained by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before taxes. The
significant items causing this difference for the nine months and three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision computed at
statutory rate
|
|
$
|
(292
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
12,814
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(4,269
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,584
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt interest
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
(1,846
|
)
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(631
|
)
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
Dividends received deduction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proration
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(5,428
|
)
|
|
|
651.6
|
|
|
|
(4,749
|
)
|
|
|
(13.0
|
)
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
(2,120
|
)
|
|
|
(13.3
|
)
|
State taxes
|
|
|
(927
|
)
|
|
|
111.3
|
|
|
|
(1,144
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
(521
|
)
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
Merger transaction costs
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
(91.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,128
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,128
|
)
|
|
|
(7.1
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
(30.4
|
)
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax
(benefit) expense
|
|
$
|
(5,638
|
)
|
|
|
(676.8
|
)%
|
|
$
|
4,355
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
(3,271
|
)
|
|
|
(26.8
|
)%
|
|
$
|
1,380
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) Comprehensive Income
The Companys comparative comprehensive income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,805
|
|
|
$
|
32,257
|
|
|
$
|
(8,926
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,575
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of deferred taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains on securities, net of deferred
tax (benefit) expense of $(3,086), $5,306, $(138)
and $2,197
|
|
|
9,184
|
|
|
|
9,854
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
4,079
|
|
Noncredit component of other than temporarily impaired
securities (a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity, net of deferred benefit of $0,
$(14,053), $0 and $0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,099
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of noncredit portion of impairment on
held-to-maturity, net of deferred tax expense of $1,158,
$729, $384 and $376
|
|
|
2,150
|
|
|
|
1,355
|
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains realized in
net income, net of tax (benefit) expense of $(2,802),
$812, $(130) and $191
|
|
|
10,010
|
|
|
|
1,508
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
Less: reclassification adjustment for impairment losses
recognized in net income, net of tax benefit of $(105),
$(167), $0 and $0
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
1,624
|
|
|
|
(16,087
|
)
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
|
4,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
6,429
|
|
|
$
|
16,170
|
|
|
$
|
(8,229
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 16 -
(6) Earnings per share:
Reconciliations of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per
share (EPS) computations for each of the periods reported herein are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
(Numerator)
|
|
|
(Denominator)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
(Numerator)
|
|
|
(Denominator)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for per share data)
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
$
|
4,805
|
|
|
|
8,491
|
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
32,257
|
|
|
|
8,422
|
|
|
$
|
3.83
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity awards and purchased options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
$
|
(.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
$
|
(.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
$
|
4,805
|
|
|
|
8,814
|
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
|
$
|
32,257
|
|
|
|
8,624
|
|
|
$
|
3.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
(Numerator)
|
|
|
(Denominator)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
(Numerator)
|
|
|
(Denominator)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for per share data)
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
$
|
(8,926
|
)
|
|
|
8,500
|
|
|
$
|
(1.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,575
|
|
|
|
8,432
|
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity awards and purchased options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
$
|
(.05
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
$
|
(8,926
|
)
|
|
|
8,500
|
|
|
$
|
(1.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,575
|
|
|
|
8,657
|
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7) Incentive Compensation:
Share-based Plans:
The Company records compensation costs using the fair value of all share awards.
Compensation expense is recorded pro-rata over the vesting period of the award.
The Company has established three share-based incentive compensation plans (the Plans),
which are described below. Management believes that the Plans provide a means whereby the
Company may attract and retain persons of ability to exert their best efforts on behalf
of the Company. The Plans generally allow for the issuance of grants and exercises
through newly issued shares, treasury stock, or any combination thereof to officers, key
employees and directors who are employed by, or provide services to the Company. The
compensation cost that has been charged against income for the Plans was approximately
$2,512,000 and $1,647,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The approximate total income tax benefit accrued and recognized in the
Companys financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
related to share-based compensation expenses was approximately $770,000 and $577,000,
respectively.
1991 and 2002 Stock Option Plans
The 1991 and 2002 Stock Option Plans (the Option Plans) were adopted by the Companys
Board of Directors and approved by its shareholders in each of their respective years.
The plans provide for the grant of non-qualified options to purchase shares of the
Companys common stock. Both of the plans authorize the issuance of options to purchase
up to 500,000 shares of the Companys common stock at not less than 95 percent of the
fair market value at the date of grant. Option awards are exercisable over the period
specified in each contract and expire at a maximum term of ten years.
- 17 -
2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan
The NYMAGIC, INC. Amended and Restated 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the LTIP) was
adopted by the Companys Board of Directors and approved by its shareholders in 2004. The
LTIP authorizes the Board of Directors to grant non-qualified options to purchase shares
of Companys common stock, share appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted share
units, unrestricted share awards, deferred share units and performance awards. The LTIP
allows for the issuance of share-based awards up to the equivalent of 450,000 shares of
the Companys common stock at not less than 95 percent of the fair market value at the
date of grant. Share grants awarded under the LTIP are exercisable over the period
specified in each contract and expire at a maximum term of ten years. The LTIP was
amended and restated in 2008 to change the amount of share equivalents that may be issued
under it from 450,000 to 900,000.
Under the LTIP, the Company has granted restricted share units (RSUs), deferred share
units (DSUs) and performance share awards (performance shares), as well as
unrestricted common stock awards (i.e., vested and unencumbered shares). Grantees
generally have the option to defer the receipt of shares of common stock that would
otherwise be acquired upon vesting of restricted share units, which allows for
preferential tax treatment by the recipient of the award.
Stock Options
The fair value of each option award has been estimated as of the respective grant-date
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model assuming the following inputs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
41.5-67.3
|
%
|
Expected dividends
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1.21-1.62
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
3-4
|
|
Risk-free rate
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1.34-1.43
|
%
|
The Company did not grant any stock option awards through the Option Plans during the
nine months ended September 30, 2010. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of
options granted for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $0 and $3.00
per share, respectively. There was $46,673 of unrecognized compensation cost related to
unvested options awarded pursuant to the Option Plans as of September 30, 2010, which
will be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of approximately
1.9 years. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 was approximately $9,551. As of September 30, 2010, the aggregate
intrinsic value was $2,925,040 for both options outstanding and vested and exercisable.
The following table sets forth stock option activity for the Option Plans for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Shares Under Option
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
Outstanding, beginning of year
|
|
|
314,950
|
|
|
$
|
15.76
|
|
|
|
185,950
|
|
|
$
|
16.48
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
$
|
14.80
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(2,500
|
)
|
|
$
|
14.47
|
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
12.59
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(15,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
19.15
|
|
|
|
(6,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
14.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of period
|
|
|
297,450
|
|
|
$
|
15.85
|
|
|
|
304,950
|
|
|
$
|
15.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, end of period
|
|
|
284,950
|
|
|
$
|
15.69
|
|
|
|
159,950
|
|
|
$
|
16.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average remaining contractual term as of September 30, 2010 for options
outstanding and options vested and exercisable was approximately 2.5 and 2.1 years,
respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, the
Company received approximately $36,000 and $62,950, respectively, in cash for the
exercise of stock options granted under the Option Plans.
- 18 -
Restricted Share Units (RSUs) and Deferred Share Units (DSUs)
RSUs, as well as restricted shares, become vested and convertible into shares of common
stock when the restrictions applicable to them lapse. In accordance with ASC 718, the
fair value of nonvested shares is estimated on the date of grant based on the market
price of the Companys stock and is amortized to compensation expense on a straight-line
basis over the related vesting periods. As of September 30, 2010, there was $1,920,514 of
unrecognized compensation cost related to RSUs, which is expected to be recognized over a
remaining weighted-average vesting period of approximately two years. The total fair
value of RSUs vested and converted to shares of common stock during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $323,690 and $398,334, respectively.
The Company has settled annual Board of Directors fees, in part, through the issuance of
DSUs. DSUs are vested immediately and are typically converted into shares of the
Companys common stock upon the departure of the grantee director. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, fees of $641,200, have been settled by the grant of 36,831
DSUs.
The following table sets forth activity for the LTIP as it relates to RSUs and DSUs for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date Fair
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Value
|
|
RSUs and DSUs
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
Nonvested, beginning of year
|
|
|
113,292
|
|
|
$
|
24.49
|
|
|
|
136,900
|
|
|
$
|
27.14
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
132,856
|
|
|
$
|
17.93
|
|
|
|
32,466
|
|
|
$
|
16.01
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(111,316
|
)
|
|
$
|
20.86
|
|
|
|
(86,066
|
)
|
|
$
|
22.59
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(4,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
40.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, end of period
|
|
|
130,832
|
|
|
$
|
20.21
|
|
|
|
83,300
|
|
|
$
|
27.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted shares of the Companys common stock have been granted pursuant to the
LTIP. 17,525 shares were granted to George Kallop, the former Chief Executive Officer and
director of the Company, during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The
unrestricted stock awards settled compensation costs of $300,028. There were no
unrestricted stock awards granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Company established the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the ESPP) in 2004. The ESPP
allows eligible employees of the Company and its designated affiliates to purchase,
through payroll deductions, shares of common stock of the Company. The ESPP is designed
to retain and motivate the employees of the Company and its designated affiliates by
encouraging them to acquire ownership in the Company on a tax-favored basis. The price
per common share sold under the ESPP is 85% (or more if the Board of Directors or the
committee administering the plan so provides) of the closing price of the Companys
shares on the New York Stock Exchange on the day the Common Stock is offered. The Company
has reserved 50,000 shares for issuance under the ESPP. There were no shares issued under
the ESPP during the nine and three month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
(8) Nature of Business and Segment Information:
The Companys subsidiaries include three insurance companies and three insurance
agencies. These subsidiaries underwrite commercial insurance in three major lines of
business. The Company considers ocean marine, inland marine/fire and other liability as
appropriate segments for purposes of evaluating the Companys overall performance. A
final segment includes the aircraft business. The Company ceased writing any new policies
covering common carrier aircraft risks subsequent to September 30, 2002, although in
October 2009 it began to write policies on small, non-common carrier aircraft. The
Company evaluates revenues and income or loss by the aforementioned segments. Revenues
include premiums earned and commission income. Income or loss includes premiums earned
and commission income less the sum of losses incurred and policy acquisition costs.
- 19 -
The financial information by segment is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
Ocean marine
|
|
$
|
36,565
|
|
|
$
|
19,463
|
|
|
$
|
39,756
|
|
|
$
|
22,576
|
|
Inland marine/fire
|
|
|
6,142
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
4,078
|
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
Other liability
|
|
|
93,830
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
74,055
|
|
|
|
6,826
|
|
Aircraft
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
2,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
136,690
|
|
|
|
20,768
|
|
|
|
117,826
|
|
|
|
33,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
7,641
|
|
|
|
7,641
|
|
|
|
15,366
|
|
|
|
15,366
|
|
Equity in earnings of limited partnerships
|
|
|
12,606
|
|
|
|
12,606
|
|
|
|
18,955
|
|
|
|
18,955
|
|
Net realized investment gains
|
|
|
7,208
|
|
|
|
7,208
|
|
|
|
2,320
|
|
|
|
2,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other-than-temporary impairments
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
Portion of loss recognized in OCI (before taxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (loss) income, net
|
|
|
(8,143
|
)
|
|
|
(8,143
|
)
|
|
|
3,289
|
|
|
|
3,289
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,512
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,877
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,047
|
)
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,355
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
155,702
|
|
|
$
|
4,805
|
|
|
$
|
157,278
|
|
|
$
|
32,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
Ocean marine
|
|
$
|
11,534
|
|
|
$
|
6,880
|
|
|
$
|
12,367
|
|
|
$
|
8,684
|
|
Inland marine/fire
|
|
|
1,829
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
1,329
|
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
Other liability
|
|
|
33,933
|
|
|
|
(2,547
|
)
|
|
|
24,811
|
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
Aircraft
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
47,330
|
|
|
|
4,517
|
|
|
|
38,593
|
|
|
|
9,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
3,792
|
|
|
|
3,792
|
|
Equity in earnings of limited partnerships
|
|
|
5,734
|
|
|
|
5,734
|
|
|
|
10,786
|
|
|
|
10,786
|
|
Net realized investment gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other-than-temporary impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion of loss recognized in OCI (before taxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (loss) income, net
|
|
|
(8,149
|
)
|
|
|
(8,149
|
)
|
|
|
3,224
|
|
|
|
3,224
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,655
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,399
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,730
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,683
|
)
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,380
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
45,001
|
|
|
$
|
(8,926
|
)
|
|
$
|
56,941
|
|
|
$
|
14,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 20 -
(9) Computer Systems:
During the preparation and review of our financial
statements for this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, the Company determined that certain computer
equipment and software no longer possessed any future service potential and accounted for it as an
abandoned asset. Accordingly, the Company charged off $8.1 million relating to disposition of the
computer systems.
(10) Related Party Transactions:
The Company entered into an investment management agreement with Mariner Partners, Inc.
(Mariner) effective October 1, 2002, which was amended and restated on December 6,
2002. Under the terms of this agreement, Mariner manages the Companys and its
subsidiaries, New York Marine And General Insurance Companys and Gotham Insurance
Companys investment portfolios. Fees to be paid to Mariner are based on a percentage of
the investment portfolios as follows: .20% of liquid assets, .30% of fixed maturity
investments and 1.25% of limited partnership (hedge fund) and equity security
investments. Another of the Companys subsidiaries, Southwest Marine And General
Insurance Company, entered into an investment management agreement, the substantive terms
of which are identical to those set forth above, with a subsidiary of Mariner, Mariner
Investment Group, Inc. (Mariner Group) effective March 1, 2007. William J.
Michaelcheck, a former director of the Company, is the Chairman and the beneficial owner
of a substantial number of shares of Mariner. George R. Trumbull, a director and the
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, A. George Kallop, formerly
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company, and William D. Shaw,
Jr., Vice Chairman and a director of the Company, are also associated with Mariner.
Investment fees incurred under the agreements with Mariner were $1,587,384,548 and
$1,537,156 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company held approximately $95.7 million in limited
partnership and limited liability company interests in hedge funds, which are selected or
directly managed by Mariner.
(11) Legal Proceedings:
Two former pool members, Utica Mutual Insurance Company (Utica Mutual) and Arkwright
Mutual Insurance Company (Arkwright), which is currently part of the FM Global Group,
withdrew from the pools in 1994 and 1996, respectively, and retained the liability for
their effective pool participation for all loss reserves, including losses incurred but
not reported (IBNR) and unearned premium reserves attributable to policies effective
prior to their withdrawal from the pools. In December, 2007, MMO, which has been managing
the pools without compensation pursuant to a Restated Management Agreement entered into
with pool members in 1986, served notice on the pool members of its intent to terminate
the Restated Management Agreement, effective December 31, 2009. Two of the pool members,
Utica Mutual and Arkwright, rejected MMOs notice of intent to terminate, and MMO
initiated an arbitration against them, seeking an arbitral award, confirming its right to
terminate the Restated Management Agreement, or in the alternative, seeking a reformation
of the Restated Management Agreement. An arbitration hearing was held in January and
February, 2010, but an award is not expected until December 2010, at the earliest.
The Company is not aware of any facts that could result in any possible defaults by
either Arkwright or Utica Mutual with respect to their pool obligations, which might
impact liquidity or results of operations of the Company, but there can be no assurance
that such events will not occur.
In February 2010, the Company paid approximately $33 million in gross claims with respect
to the WTC Attack. The ceded recovery with respect to this claim is approximately
$22 million. While the claim payment adversely impacted cash flows from operations, it
did not have a substantial impact on results of operations or financial position. Several
reinsurers are currently disputing payment of the recovery to the Company based upon
their denial of any obligation to pay property settlements and their interpretation as to
the number of occurrences as defined in the aircraft ceded reinsurance treaties. The
Company intends to vigorously pursue such balances through arbitrations, settlements or
commutations, if necessary, but an unfavorable resolution of such collection efforts
could have a material adverse impact to our results of operations.
The Companys insurance subsidiaries are subject to disputes, including litigation and
arbitration, arising out of the ordinary course of business. The Companys estimates of
the costs of settling such matters are reflected in its reserves for losses and loss
expenses, and the Company does not believe that the ultimate outcome of such matters will
have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
- 21 -
(12) Subsequent Events:
Proposed Merger
On July 15, 2010 the Company announced that it entered into a definitive agreement to be
acquired by ProSight Specialty Insurance Holdings, Inc. for $25.75 per share. ProSight
Specialty Insurance was founded by a group of senior executives from the property and
casualty industry and is backed by affiliates of TPG Capital and GS Capital Partners.
Under the terms of the agreement, NYMAGIC stockholders will receive $25.75 per share in
cash. The transaction will be 100% equity funded by ProSight Specialty Insurance.
Completion of the transaction, which is expected to occur in the fourth quarter of 2010,
is subject to the approval of NYMAGIC stockholders, the Company having a minimum tangible
book value of at least $205 million, customary closing conditions and regulatory
approvals.
Litigation Relating to the Proposed Merger
Between July 16 and July 26, 2010, four substantially similar putative class action
lawsuits were commenced by stockholders of NYMAGIC against the Company, its board of
directors and ProSight in the Supreme Court of the State of New York for the County of
New York challenging the proposed merger, captioned, Gross v. NYMAGIC, Inc., No.
650979/2010 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. filed July 16, 2010), Kahn v. Trumbull, No. 651033/2010 (N.Y.
Sup. Ct. filed July 20, 2010), Cambridge Retirement System v. NYMAGIC, Inc., No.
651058/2010 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. filed July 21, 2010), and Walker v. NYMAGIC, Inc., No.
109851/2010 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. filed July 26, 2010), respectively. The complaints, each of
which purports to be brought as a class action on behalf of all of the Companys
stockholders, excluding the defendants and their affiliates, allege that the
consideration that stockholders will receive in connection with the merger is inadequate
and that the Companys directors breached their fiduciary duties to stockholders in
negotiating and approving the merger agreement. The complaints further allege that the
Company and/or ProSight aided and abetted the alleged breaches by the Companys
directors. The complaints seek various forms of relief, including injunctive relief to
prevent consummation of the merger.
On September 1, 2010, the actions were consolidated and, on September 3, 2010, the
plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint. In addition to the allegations set
forth above, the consolidated amended complaint also alleges that the Companys directors
breached their fiduciary duties in disseminating incomplete and/or inaccurate information
regarding the proposed merger, and added Goldman, Sachs & Co. as a defendant based on
allegations that it aided and abetted the directors alleged breach of their fiduciary
duties.
Although the Company believes that the claims asserted in the actions are without merit,
on October 22, 2010, the parties entered into a memorandum of understanding reflecting an
agreement in principle to settle and dismiss the actions on the basis that certain
additional disclosures would be made in the Proxy Statement provided to the Companys
shareholders. The proposed settlement is subject to court approval and other conditions.
- 22 -
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Description of Business
NYMAGIC, INC., a New York corporation (the Company or NYMAGIC), is a holding company
which owns and operates insurance companies, risk bearing entities and insurance
underwriters and managers.
Insurance Companies:
New York Marine And General Insurance Company (New York Marine)
Gotham Insurance Company (Gotham)
Southwest Marine And General Insurance Company (Southwest Marine)
Insurance Underwriters and Managers:
Mutual Marine Office, Inc. (MMO)
Pacific Mutual Marine Office, Inc. (PMMO)
Mutual Marine Office of the Midwest, Inc. (Midwest)
New York Marine and Gotham each currently holds a financial strength rating of A
(Excellent) and Southwest Marine currently holds a financial strength rating of A-
(Excellent) and an issuer credit rating of a- from A.M. Best Company. These are the
third and fourth highest of fifteen rating levels in A.M. Bests classification system.
The Companys insureds rely on ratings issued by rating agencies. Any adverse change in
the ratings assigned to New York Marine, Gotham or Southwest Marine may adversely impact
their ability to write premiums.
The Company specializes in underwriting ocean marine, inland marine/fire and other
liability insurance through insurance pools managed by the Companys insurance
underwriters and managers, MMO, PMMO and Midwest (collectively referred to as MMO). The
original members of the pools were insurance companies that were not affiliated with the
Company. Subsequently, New York Marine and Gotham joined the pools. Over the years, New
York Marine and Gotham steadily increased their participation in the pools, while the
unaffiliated insurance companies reduced their participation or withdrew from the pools
entirely. Since January 1, 1997, New York Marine and Gotham have been the only members of
the pools, and therefore we now write 100% of all of the business produced by the pools.
In prior years, the Company issued policies covering aircraft insurance; however, the
Company ceased writing any new policies covering aircraft risks as of September 30, 2002.
The Company decided to exit the commercial aviation insurance business, because it is
highly competitive, generated underwriting losses during the 1990s and is highly
dependent on the purchase of substantial amounts of reinsurance, which became
increasingly expensive after the events of September 11, 2001. In 2009, however, the
Company began underwriting policies covering single engine non-commercial aircraft.
In 2005, the Company formed Southwest Marine And General Insurance Company (Southwest
Marine), as a wholly owned subsidiary in the State of Arizona. Southwest Marine writes,
among other lines of insurance, excess and surplus lines in New York and surety business
in others states where it is licensed to write policies.
In 2008, the Company acquired a book of professional liability business oriented to
insurance brokers and agents and also formed MMO Agencies, which focuses on generating
additional premium growth through a network of general agents with binding authority
subject to underwriting criteria established and monitored by MMO.
Results of Operations
The Company reported a net loss for the third quarter ended September 30, 2010 of $(8.9)
million, or $(1.05) per diluted share, compared with net income of $14.6 million, or
$1.68 per diluted share, for the third quarter of 2009. The decrease in results of
operations for the third quarter of 2010 when compared to the same period of 2009 was
primarily attributable to an after tax write-off of $5.3 million relating to its computer
systems that we determined to make during the preparation and review of our financial
statements for this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, as well as an increase in losses
incurred and a decrease in investment income.
The Company reported net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 of $4.8
million, or $.55 per diluted share, compared with $32.3 million, or $3.74 per diluted
share, for the same period in 2009. The decrease in results of operations for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 when compared to the same period of 2009 was primarily
attributable to the after tax write-off of $5.3 million relating to its computer systems
referred to in the preceding paragraph, as well as an increase in incurred losses and a
decrease in investment income, which was partially offset by an increase in realized
investment gains and tax benefits of $6.3 million, or $.71 per diluted share, as a result
of the partial reversal of the deferred tax valuation allowance previously provided for
capital losses.
- 23 -
Shareholders equity increased to $222.3 million as of September 30, 2010 compared to
$216.0 million as of December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to net
income for the period which was partially offset by dividends declared.
The Companys gross premiums written, net premiums written and net premiums earned
increased by 13%, 23% and 16%, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30,
2010, when compared to the same period of 2009.
Premiums for each segment were as follows:
NYMAGIC Gross Premiums Written By Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Ocean marine
|
|
$
|
55,479
|
|
|
$
|
61,414
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
$
|
16,998
|
|
|
$
|
16,814
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Inland marine/fire
|
|
|
15,516
|
|
|
|
15,750
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
4,416
|
|
|
|
4,458
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
Other liability
|
|
|
117,083
|
|
|
|
90,161
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
40,315
|
|
|
|
28,121
|
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
188,078
|
|
|
|
167,325
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
61,729
|
|
|
|
49,393
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
Runoff lines (Aircraft)
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
188,598
|
|
|
$
|
167,403
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
$
|
61,887
|
|
|
$
|
49,462
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYMAGIC Net Premiums Written By Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Ocean marine
|
|
$
|
39,420
|
|
|
$
|
41,664
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
12,205
|
|
|
$
|
11,727
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Inland marine/fire
|
|
|
7,497
|
|
|
|
5,181
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
Other liability
|
|
|
107,964
|
|
|
|
79,210
|
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
36,629
|
|
|
|
24,470
|
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
154,881
|
|
|
|
126,055
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
50,185
|
|
|
|
37,602
|
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
Runoff lines (Aircraft)
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
155,320
|
|
|
$
|
125,992
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
$
|
50,260
|
|
|
$
|
37,688
|
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYMAGIC Net Premiums Earned By Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Ocean marine
|
|
$
|
36,501
|
|
|
$
|
39,689
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
$
|
11,549
|
|
|
$
|
12,264
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
Inland marine/fire
|
|
|
6,142
|
|
|
|
4,078
|
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
1,829
|
|
|
|
1,329
|
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
Other liability
|
|
|
93,820
|
|
|
|
73,973
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
33,923
|
|
|
|
24,827
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
136,463
|
|
|
|
117,740
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
47,301
|
|
|
|
38,420
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
Runoff lines (Aircraft)
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
136,616
|
|
|
$
|
117,677
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
$
|
47,335
|
|
|
$
|
38,506
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean marine gross premiums written for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
decreased by 10%, primarily reflecting reduced volume due to competitive markets as well
as slightly lower premium rates in the various marine classes. Ocean marine net premiums
written and net premiums earned for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 decreased by
5% and 8%, respectively, when compared to the same period of 2009 and largely reflected
the decline in gross premiums written which was
partially offset by lower excess of loss reinsurance costs resulting from larger net loss
retentions on business written in the current policy year.
- 24 -
Ocean marine gross premiums written for the three months ended September 30, 2010
increased by 1%, primarily reflecting rate increases on rig premiums which were partially
offset by slightly lower premium rates in the other various marine classes. Ocean marine
net premiums written and net premiums earned for the three months ended September 30,
2010 increased by 4% and decreased by 6%, respectively, when compared to the same period
of 2009 and largely reflected lower excess of loss reinsurance costs.
In 2009, the Company maintained a net loss retention of $5 million per risk in the ocean
marine line. In 2009, an additional amount up to $5 million, depending upon the gross
loss to the Company in excess of $5 million, was ceded to reinsurers. Effective January
1, 2010, the Company maintained its $5 million per risk net loss retention in the ocean
marine line that was in existence during 2009; however, the Company could retain an
additional amount up to $5 million depending upon the gross loss to the Company in excess
of $5 million. In addition, certain losses are limited to $2 million plus reinsurance
reinstatement costs. The quota share reinsurance protection for energy business remains
in effect for 2010 and energy business was also included within the ocean marine
reinsurance program.
Inland marine/fire gross premiums written decreased 1% and net premiums written increased
by 45% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, when compared to the
same period of 2009. Net premiums earned for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
increased by 51%. Gross premiums reflected mildly lower market rates and lower production
in the fire class, which were partially offset by increases in production in surety
business that were attributable to an additional agent appointment. The increase in net
premiums written and net premiums earned reflected larger net retention levels of fire
premiums when compared to the prior years first nine months as well as larger amounts of
surety premiums which are written net of reinsurance.
Inland marine/fire gross premiums and net premiums written decreased by 1% and 4%,
respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2010 when compared to the same
period of 2009. Gross premiums written for the three months ended September 30, 2010
reflect decreases in production and mild rate decreases in fire premiums that were
partially offset by increasing business in surety risks. Net premiums earned for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 increased by 38% largely reflecting increased net
premiums from earlier in the year.
Other liability gross premiums written and net premiums written increased 30% and 36%,
respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 when compared to the same
period in 2009. Net premiums earned for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
increased by 27% when compared to the same period in 2009. The increases in premiums are
primarily due to production from MMO Agencies, which was formed in 2008 to write premiums
through a network of general agents with binding authority subject to underwriting
criteria established and monitored by the Company. In addition, commercial auto liability
premiums grew largely as a result of the appointment of a new agent that focuses on
trucking business written primarily in California. Net premiums written reflected the
increase in gross written premiums as well as higher net retention levels in the
professional liability class.
Other liability gross premiums written and net premiums written increased 43% and 50%,
respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2010 when compared to the same
period in 2009. Net premiums earned for the three months ended September 30, 2010
increased by 37% when compared to the same period in 2009. The increase in gross and net
premiums written is largely attributable to premiums from MMO Agencies, commercial auto
premiums resulting from the new agent appointment and production increases in excess
workers compensation premiums.
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred as a percentage of net premiums earned
(the loss ratio) was 66.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to
51.5% for the same period of 2009. The loss ratio was 61.4% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to 49.2% for the same period in 2009. Contributing to the
higher loss ratios in 2010 were increased severity losses in the ocean marine and inland
marine/fire lines of business, larger than expected loss ratios in the professional
liability and commercial auto classes as well as lower amounts of overall favorable
reserve development. Contributing to a higher ocean marine loss ratio in 2010 were larger
severity losses. The other liability loss ratio increased due to
larger than expected loss ratios in the professional liability class due to a greater
frequency of losses as well as larger severity losses, which were partially offset by
lower loss estimates used for contractors liability business. The inland marine/fire
segment reflected a higher loss ratio in 2010 largely attributable to severity losses and
lower amounts of favorable loss reserve development.
The Company reported favorable development of prior year loss reserves of $2.7 million
during the first nine months of 2010 as a result of favorable reported loss trends
arising from the ocean marine, excess workers compensation and contractors liability
lines of business in 2010, which was partially offset by adverse development in the
professional liability class. Adverse development of prior year loss reserves of $(1.0)
million during the third quarter of 2010 was largely attributable to the professional
liability class in accident years 2007 and 2008, but partially offset by favorable
development in the ocean marine and excess workers compensation classes. In addition,
partially contributing to the favorable loss development in 2010 was
approximately $0.6 million and $0.3 million in the nine months and third quarter ended
September 30, respectively, in favorable loss development in the aviation line.
- 25 -
The Company reported favorable development of prior year loss reserves of $13.2 million
and $3.9 million during the first nine months and third quarter of 2009, respectively, as
a result of favorable reported loss trends arising from the ocean marine and other
liability lines of business in 2009, including the favorable resolution of large severity
claims and lower than expected emergence of claims. In addition, partially contributing
to the favorable loss development in 2009 were approximately $2.3 million and $0.2
million in the nine months and third quarter ended September 30, respectively, in
favorable loss development in the aviation line.
Policy acquisition costs as a percentage of net premiums earned (the acquisition cost
ratio) for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 were 24.2%
and 23.6%, respectively. The acquisition cost ratios for the nine months ended September
30, 2010 and 2009 were 23.5% and 22.9%, respectively. The slightly higher acquisition
cost ratio for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was largely
attributable to increased writings within the other liability line of business which have
higher acquisition costs associated with them. The inland marine/fire segment also
reported higher acquisition cost ratios in 2010 when compared to the three months and
nine months ended September 30, 2009 largely as a result of increased surety premiums and
lower reinsurance commissions in the fire class due to lower premium cessions to
reinsurers. The ocean marine class also reported a lower acquisition cost ratio in 2010
when compared to 2009 largely due to lower excess of loss reinsurance costs in rig
premiums which have lower net commissions.
General and administrative expenses increased by 22% and 15% for the third quarter and
nine months ended September 30, 2010 when compared to the same period of 2009. Larger
expenses were incurred in 2010 due to compensation and related benefits to service the
growth in the Companys business operations, merger expenses of $2.1 million, and
arbitration expenses including legal expenses from disputes arising from reinsurance
receivables.
The Companys combined ratio (the loss ratio, the acquisition cost ratio and general and
administrative expenses divided by net premiums earned) was 117.2% for the three months
ended September 30, 2010 as compared to 102.1% for the same period in 2009. The Companys
combined ratio was 110.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to
98.3% for the same period in 2009.
Interest expense of $5.1 million and $1.7 million for the nine and three months ended
September 30, 2010 was comparable to the same periods of 2009.
Net investment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $7.6 million as
compared to $15.4 million for the same period of 2009. Net investment income in 2010
decreased primarily as a result of lower investment yields on a larger short-term investment portfolio. Investment
income from fixed maturities, available for sale, was lower in 2010 primarily due to
lower investment balances carried when compared to the prior years first nine months.
Investment income from commercial loans was greater in 2009 when compared to 2010
primarily due to unrealized appreciation in such investments. Trading portfolio income of
$3.4 million in 2010 resulted primarily from realized gains associated with sales of U.S.
Treasury securities as compared to $4.5 million for 2009, which resulted primarily from
increases in the market value of tax-exempt securities.
Net investment income for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was $86,000 as
compared to $3.8 million for the same period of 2009. Net investment income in 2010
reflected decreased primarily as a result of lower investment yields on a larger short-term
investment portfolio. Investment income from fixed
maturities, available for sale, was lower in 2010 primarily due to lower investment
balances carried when compared to the prior years third quarter. Trading portfolio
income of $0.0 million in 2010 compared to $0.8 million for 2009, which resulted
primarily from increases in the market value of tax-exempt securities.
- 26 -
Investment income, net of investment fees, from each major category of investments was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Fixed maturities held to maturity
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Investment expenses
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
7.6
|
|
|
$
|
15.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of limited partnerships for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
was $12.6 million as compared to $19.0 million for the same period of 2009. Limited
partnership income for the first nine months of 2010 decreased from the same period of
the prior year as a result of lower returns amounting to 9.0% as compared to 14.6% for
the same period of 2009. For the first nine months of 2010, G-7 fund arbitrage strategies
and our investment in Tiptree Financial Partners LP (when compared to our prior
investment in Altrion), reported lower returns than the prior years comparable period.
Partially offsetting this decline was an increase in returns from multi-strategy funds.
Equity in earnings of limited partnerships for the three months ended September 30, 2010
was $5.7 million as compared to $10.8 million for the same period of 2009. The decrease
in limited partnership income was largely due to the performance of the Companys
investments in G-7 arbitrage strategies and Tiptree Financial Partners, LP. Limited
partnerships reported lower overall yields of 4.8% in 2010 as compared to 7.0% in 2009.
As of September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, investments in limited partnerships
amounted to approximately $132.1 million and $158.8 million, respectively. The equity
method of accounting is used to account for the Companys limited partnership hedge fund
investments. Under the equity method, the Company records all changes in the underlying
value of the limited partnership hedge fund to results of operations.
As of September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, investments in the trading and
commercial loan portfolios collectively amounted to approximately $3.0 million and $4.3
million, respectively. Net investment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009 reflected approximately $3.4 million and $6.6 million, respectively, derived
from combined trading portfolio and commercial loan activities. These activities
primarily include the trading of U.S. Treasury securities, commercial loans, municipal
obligations and preferred stocks. The Companys trading and commercial loan portfolios
are marked to market with the change recognized in net investment income during the
current period. Any realized gains or losses resulting from the sales of trading and
commercial loan investments are also recognized in net investment income.
The Companys investment income results may be volatile depending upon the level of
limited partnerships, commercial loans and trading portfolio investments held. If the
Company invests a greater percentage of its investment portfolio in limited partnership
hedge funds, and/or if the fair value of trading and/or commercial loan investments held
varies significantly during different periods, there may also be a greater volatility
associated with the Companys investment income.
Other (loss) income decreased to $(8.2) million for the three months ended September 30,
2010 from $3.3 million for the same period in the prior year. Other (loss) income
decreased to $(8.1) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $3.4
million for the same period in the prior year. During the preparation and review of our
financial statements for this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, the Company determined that certain
computer equipment and software no longer possessed any future service potential and accounted
for it as an abandoned asset. Accordingly, the Company charged off $8.1 million relating to disposition
of the computer systems. The income in
2009 was attributable to the Companys receipt of $3.2 million in the third quarter of
2009 as beneficiary of a life insurance policy on a former director.
There were no realized gains for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to
net realized investment gains of $0.5 million for the same period in the prior year. Net
realized investment gains were $6.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
as compared to net realized gains of $2.3 million for the same period in the prior year.
Net realized investment gains in 2010 and 2009 primarily reflected gains from the sales
of U.S. Treasury securities.
- 27 -
Write-downs from OTTI in the fair value of securities amounted to $0 and $0.3 million for
the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively as compared to$0
and $0.5 million for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009. The OTTI
recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was attributable to the Companys
intention to sell U.S. Treasury securities that were not expected to recover their entire
amortized cost prior to sale. The OTTI recorded for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 was attributable to the Companys intention to sell certain municipal securities
that were not expected to recover their entire amortized cost prior to sale.
Total income tax (benefit) expense amounted to $(3.3) million and $1.4 million,
respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. Total income tax
expense amounted to $(5.6) million and $4.4 million, respectively, for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. The lower tax amounts for the third quarter and nine
months ended September 30, 2010 include tax benefits of $0 and $6.3 million, or $.72 per
diluted share, respectively, as a result of the partial reversal of the deferred tax
valuation allowance previously provided for capital losses. This compares to the partial
reversal of the deferred tax valuation allowance during the third quarter and nine months
ended September 30, 2009 of $3.3 million, or $.38 per diluted share.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Total cash and investments and receivable for securities disposed decreased from $679.9
million at December 31, 2009 to $641.3 million at September 30, 2010, principally due to
receivables for securities sold of $51.8 million and an increase in paid losses mainly
attributable to the payment of aviation claims relating to the terrorist attacks of
September 11, 2001 on the World Trade Center, which was partially offset by the
collection of premiums and sales of appreciated investments. The Company is in the
process of liquidating a majority of its investments in limited partnerships. This will
serve to increase the level of cash and short term investments upon the receipt of the
proceeds from such sales. At September 30, 2010, the level of cash and short-term
investments of $434.3 million reflected the Companys high liquidity position and
conservative investing posture.
Cash flows used in operating activities were $7.1 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to cash flows provided by operating activities of $89.8
million for the same period in 2009. Trading portfolio and commercial loan activities of
$2.0 million favorably affected cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
while such activities favorably affected cash flows by $27.6 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009. Trading portfolio activities include the purchase and sale of
U.S. Treasury securities, preferred stocks and municipal bonds. Commercial loan
activities include the purchase and sale of middle market loans made to commercial
companies. As the Companys trading and commercial loan portfolio balances may fluctuate
significantly from period to period, cash flows from operating activities may also be
significantly impacted by such activities. Contributing to a decrease in operating cash
flows, other than trading and commercial loan activities, during 2010 was an increase in
paid losses mainly attributable to the gross payment of $33 million of aviation claims
relating to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 on the World Trade Center.
Approximately $22 million was ceded to reinsurers, of which $11 million was outstanding
as of September 30, 2010. Contributing to an increase in operating cash flows, other than
trading and commercial loan activities during 2009, was the collection of premiums and
reinsurance recoverable balances and lower amounts of paid losses.
Cash flows provided by investing activities were $360.4 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to cash flows used in investing activities of $98.0
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The cash flows for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 were favorably impacted by the net sale of fixed maturities
available for sale, which primarily includes U.S. Treasuries. The favorable cash flows
were partially offset by increased investments in limited partnerships. The cash flows
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were adversely impacted by the net purchase
of fixed maturity available for sale investments. This resulted primarily from the sale
of selected municipal securities, U.S. Treasury securities and net sale of short-term
investments of $45.3 million undertaken to further reposition the Companys holdings into
corporate bonds.
Cash flows provided by financing activities were $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. In 2010 and 2009, cash
inflows from the proceeds, including tax benefits, of stock issuances were partially
offset by cash dividends.
On March 10, 2010, the Company declared a dividend to shareholders of ten (10) cents per
share payable on April 7, 2010 to shareholders of record on March 31, 2010. On March 10,
2009, the Company declared a dividend to shareholders of four (4) cents per share payable
on April 7, 2009 to shareholders of record on March 31, 2009. On May 20, 2010, the
Company declared a dividend to shareholders of ten (10) cents per share payable on July
8, 2010 to shareholders of record on June 30, 2010. On May 21, 2009, the Company declared
a dividend to shareholders of four (4) cents per share payable on July 7, 2009 to
shareholders of record on June 30, 2009. On September 20, 2010, the Company declared a
dividend of ten (10) cents per share to
shareholders of record on September 30, 2010, payable on October 6, 2010. On September
17, 2009, the Company declared a dividend of six (6) cents per share to shareholders of
record on September 30, 2009, payable on October 6, 2009.
- 28 -
New York Marine and Gotham declared and paid ordinary dividends of $10.0 million and $0.4
million, respectively, to the Company during the first nine months of 2010. New York
Marine and Gotham declared $5.0 million and $0.6 million, respectively, in ordinary
dividends to the Company during the first nine months of 2009.
Under the NYMAGIC, INC. Amended and Restated 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the LTIP),
the Company granted 132,856 restricted shares and deferred share units to officers and
Directors of the Company, 17,525 unrestricted shares of Common Stock to the President and
Chief Executive Officer and 36,831 deferred shares units to the Companys Directors
during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Under the LTIP, the Company granted 8,000 restricted share units, and up to 49,000
performance share units and 100,000 stock options to the President and Chief Executive
Officer during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The market price per share and
option price per share on the grant date of the stock option were $9.88 and $15.00 per
share, respectively. The Company also granted 30,000 stock options to certain directors.
The market price per share equaled the option price per share on the grant date of the
stock options which ranged from $12.41 to $15.00 per share, respectively.
Under the Common Stock Repurchase Plan (the Plan), the Company may purchase up to $75
million of the Companys issued and outstanding shares of common stock on the open
market. During the first nine months of 2010 and 2009, there were no repurchases of
common stock made under the Plan.
Premiums and other receivables, net increased to $30.0 million as of September 30, 2010
from $24.8 million as of December 31, 2009, and the reserve for unearned premiums
increased to $109.6 million as of September 30, 2010 from $89.5 million as of December
31, 2009, primarily as a result of excess workers compensation gross writings, which are
substantially written during the first half of the calendar year and increased writings
from MMO Agencies and commercial auto.
Deferred acquisition costs increased to $21.3 million as of September 30, 2010 from $16.4
million as of December 31, 2009 largely as a result of the increase in the unearned
premiums in the other liability segment.
Reinsurance receivables on paid balances, net as of September 30, 2010, increased to
$25.1 million from $13.1 million as of December 31, 2009 and reinsurance receivables on
unpaid balances, net at September 30, 2010 decreased to $181.2 million from $205.1
million as of December 31, 2009 largely as a result of the cession of approximately $22
million to reinsurers that resulted from $33 million in gross aviation payments relating
to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 on the World Trade Center. Unpaid losses
and loss adjustment expenses as of September 30, 2010, decreased to $538.3 million from
$555.5 million as of December 31, 2009 primarily as a result of gross loss payments in
the aviation segment.
Other assets at September 30, 2010 increased to $7.6 million from $4.1 million as of
December 31, 2009 largely as a result of an increase in federal income tax recoverable.
Other liabilities at September 30, 2010 decreased to $27.7 million from $34.9 million as
of December 31, 2009 largely as a result of a decrease in accrued expenses, interest
expense payable and amounts to MMO pool members.
- 29 -
Investments
A summary of the Companys investment components at September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Fixed maturities held to maturity (adjusted amortized cost):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
52,483,006
|
|
|
|
8.18
|
%
|
|
$
|
56,589,704
|
|
|
|
8.37
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities held to maturity
|
|
$
|
52,483,006
|
|
|
|
8.18
|
%
|
|
$
|
56,589,704
|
|
|
|
8.37
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale (fair value):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$
|
18,434,108
|
|
|
|
2.87
|
%
|
|
$
|
385,715,035
|
|
|
|
57.09
|
%
|
Municipal obligations
|
|
|
824,548
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
%
|
|
|
804,373
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities available for sale
|
|
$
|
19,258,656
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
386,519,408
|
|
|
|
57.21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities
|
|
$
|
71,741,662
|
|
|
|
11.18
|
%
|
|
$
|
443,109,112
|
|
|
|
65.58
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities available for sale (fair value):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
$
|
101,780
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
$
|
117,968
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities
|
|
$
|
101,780
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
$
|
117,968
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
|
|
$
|
434,251,099
|
|
|
|
67.71
|
%
|
|
$
|
75,544,627
|
|
|
|
11.18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities, equity securities, cash, cash
equivalents and short-term investments
|
|
$
|
506,094,541
|
|
|
|
78.91
|
%
|
|
$
|
518,771,707
|
|
|
|
76.78
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans (fair value)
|
|
$
|
3,018,117
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,001,118
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
%
|
Limited partnership hedge funds (equity)
|
|
$
|
132,222,970
|
|
|
|
20.62
|
%
|
|
$
|
151,891,838
|
|
|
|
22.48
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment portfolio
|
|
$
|
641,335,628
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
675,664,663
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010, 92.1% of the Companys fixed income and short-term investment
portfolios were considered investment grade by S&P. As of September 30, 2010, the Company
invested approximately $40.1 million in fixed maturities that were below investment
grade.
- 30 -
Details of the RMBS portfolio as of September 30, 2010, including publicly available
qualitative information, are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan to
|
|
|
FICO
|
|
|
D60+
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
S&P
|
|
Moodys
|
Security
|
|
|
|
|
|
amortized cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value %
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
Delinquency
|
|
|
Support
|
|
|
Rating
|
|
Rating
|
description
|
|
Issue date
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
Score (2)
|
|
|
Rate (3)
|
|
|
Level (4)
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
(5)
|
AHMA 2006-3
|
|
|
7/2006
|
|
|
$
|
10,457,012
|
|
|
$
|
9,707,649
|
|
|
|
84.8
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
|
|
35.3
|
|
|
AA
|
|
Caa1
|
CWALT 2005-69
|
|
|
11/2005
|
|
|
|
6,677,549
|
|
|
|
6,077,223
|
|
|
|
80.1
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
55.3
|
|
|
|
47.6
|
|
|
CCC
|
|
Ba3
|
CWALT 2005-76
|
|
|
12/2005
|
|
|
|
6,605,873
|
|
|
|
6,341,236
|
|
|
|
81.4
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
|
47.1
|
|
|
CCC
|
|
B2
|
RALI 2005-QO3
|
|
|
10/2005
|
|
|
|
7,042,417
|
|
|
|
5,525,030
|
|
|
|
80.2
|
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
43.2
|
|
|
|
38.3
|
|
|
B-
|
|
B1
|
WaMu 2005-AR17
|
|
|
12/2005
|
|
|
|
5,688,359
|
|
|
|
6,976,057
|
|
|
|
72.4
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
29.2
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
A1
|
WaMu 2006-AR9
|
|
|
7/2006
|
|
|
|
7,842,748
|
|
|
|
8,649,699
|
|
|
|
73.7
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
33.4
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
B
|
|
Ba1
|
WaMu 2006-AR13
|
|
|
9/2006
|
|
|
|
8,169,048
|
|
|
|
9,296,959
|
|
|
|
75.1
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
|
|
|
22.9
|
|
|
CCC
|
|
B3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,483,006
|
|
|
$
|
52,573,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The dollar-weighted average amortized loan-to-original value of the underlying loans at
October 25, 2010.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Average FICO credit score at origination of remaining borrowers in the loan pool at October 25, 2010.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The percentage of the current outstanding principal balance that is more than 60 days
delinquent as of October 25, 2010. This includes loans that are in foreclosure and real estate
owned.
|
|
(4)
|
|
The current credit support provided by subordinate ranking tranches within the overall
security structure at October 25, 2010.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Ratings as of October 25, 2010.
|
|
(6)
|
|
After OTTI recognized in OCI.
|
The Companys cash flow analysis for each of these securities attempts to estimate the
likelihood of any future impairment. While the Company does not believe there are any
other than temporary impairments (OTTI) currently, future estimates may change
depending upon the actual performance statistics reported for each security to the
Company. This may result in future charges based upon revised estimates for delinquency
rates, severity rates or prepayment patterns. These changes in estimates may be material.
These securities are collateralized by pools of Alt-A mortgages, and receive priority
payments from these pools. The Companys securities rank senior to subordinated tranches
of debt collateralized by each respective pool of mortgages. The Company has collected
all applicable interest and principal repayments on such securities to date. As of
October 25, 2010, the levels of subordination ranged from 22.5% to 49.3% of the total
debt outstanding for each pool. Delinquencies within the underlying mortgage pools ranged
from 29.2% to 55.3% of total amounts outstanding. For comparison purposes, as of October
25, 2009, delinquencies ranged from 28.7% to 51.1%, while subordination levels ranged
from 25.7% to 51.0%. Delinquency rates are not the same as severity rates, or actual
loss, but are an indication of the potential for losses of some degree in future periods.
The fair value of each RMBS investment is based on the framework established in ASC 820
(See Note 3). Fair value is determined by estimating the price at which an asset might be
sold on the measurement date. There has been a considerable amount of turmoil in the U.S.
housing market since 2007, which has led to market declines in the Companys RMBS
securities. Because the pricing of these investments is complex and has many variables
affecting price including, projected delinquency rates, projected severity rates,
estimated loan to value ratios, vintage year, subordination levels, projected prepayment
speeds and expected rates of return required by prospective purchasers, the estimated
price of such securities will differ among brokers depending on these facts and
assumptions. While many of the inputs utilized in pricing are observable, many other
inputs are unobservable and will vary depending upon the broker. During periods of market
dislocation, such as current market conditions, it is increasingly difficult to value
such investments because trading becomes less frequent and/or market data becomes less
observable. As a result, valuations may include inputs and assumptions that are less
observable or require greater estimation and judgment as well as valuation methods that
are more complex. For example, assumptions regarding projected delinquency and severity
rates have become very pessimistic due to uncertainties associated with the residential
real estate markets. Additionally, there are only a limited number of prospective
purchasers of such securities and such purchasers generally demand high expected returns
in the current market. This has resulted in lower quotes from securities dealers, who
are, themselves, reluctant to position such securities because of financing
uncertainties. Accordingly, the dealer quotes used to establish fair value may not be
reflective of the expected future cash flows from a security and, therefore, not
reflective of its intrinsic value.
- 31 -
As of September 30, 2010, there was no significant variance in RMBS securities prices
from different pricing sources. Accordingly, the Company determined fair value using
prices obtained from its custodian. From September 30, 2009 to June 30, 2010, there was variance in RMBS
securities prices from different pricing sources, therefore, the Company determined fair
value using a matrix pricing analysis.
There are government sponsored programs that may affect the performance of the Companys
RMBS. Further there has been recent moratoriums on foreclosures and extensive litigation
regarding placing mortgages back to the originators, The Company is uncertain as to the
impact, if any, these programs or events will have on the fair value of the Companys
RMBS. The fair value of such securities at September 30, 2010 was approximately $52.6
million.
The Companys estimates of fair value for financial assets and financial liabilities are
based on the framework established in ASC 820. The framework is based on the inputs used
in valuation and gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and
requires that observable inputs be used in the valuations when available. The disclosure
of fair value estimates in the ASC 820 hierarchy is based on whether the significant
inputs into the valuation are observable. In determining the level of the hierarchy in
which the estimate is disclosed, the highest priority is given to unadjusted quoted
prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs that reflect the
Companys significant market assumptions. The standard describes three levels of inputs
that may be used to measure fair value and categorize the assets and liabilities within
the hierarchy:
Level 1
Fair value is based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are
accessible to the Company for identical assets or liabilities. These prices generally
provide the most reliable evidence and are used to measure fair value whenever available.
Active markets are defined as having the following for the measured asset/liability: i)
many transactions, ii) current prices, iii) price quotes not varying substantially among
market makers, iv) narrow bid/ask spreads and v) most information publicly available.
The Companys Level 1 assets are comprised of U.S. Treasury securities, which are highly
liquid and traded in active exchange markets.
The Company uses the quoted market prices as fair value for assets classified as Level 1.
The Company receives quoted market prices from a third party, a nationally recognized
pricing service. Prices are obtained from available sources for market transactions
involving identical assets. For the majority of Level 1 investments, the Company receives
quoted market prices from an independent pricing service. The Company validates primary
source prices by back testing to trade data to confirm that the pricing services
significant inputs are observable. The Company also compares the prices received from the
third party service to other third party sources to validate the consistency of the
prices received on securities.
Level 2
Fair value is based on significant inputs, other than Level 1 inputs, that are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially
the full term of the asset through corroboration with observable market data. Level 2
inputs include quoted market prices in active markets for similar assets, non-binding
quotes in markets that are not active for identical or similar assets and other market
observable inputs (e.g., interest rates, yield curves, prepayment speeds, default rates
loss severities, etc.).
The Companys Level 2 assets include municipal debt obligations.
The Company generally obtains valuations from third party pricing services and/or
security dealers for identical or comparable assets or liabilities by obtaining
non-binding broker quotes (when pricing service information is not available) in order to
determine an estimate of fair value. The Company bases all of its estimates of fair value
for assets on the bid price as it represents what a third party market participant would
be willing to pay in an arms length transaction. Prices from pricing services are
validated by the Company through comparison to prices from corroborating sources and are
validated by back testing to trade data to confirm that the pricing services significant
inputs are observable. Under certain conditions, the Company may conclude the prices
received from independent third party pricing services or brokers are not reasonable or
reflective of market activity or that significant inputs are not observable, in which
case it may choose to over-ride the third-party pricing information or quotes received
and apply internally developed values to the related assets or liabilities. In such
cases, those valuations would be generally classified as Level 3. Generally, the Company
utilizes an independent pricing service to price its municipal debt obligations.
Currently, these securities are exhibiting low trade volume. The Company considers such
investments to be in the Level 2 category.
Level 3
Fair value is based on at least one or more significant unobservable inputs
that are supported by little or no market activity for the asset. These inputs reflect
the Companys understanding about the assumptions market participants would use in
pricing the asset or liability.
The Companys Level 3 assets include its RMBS, commercial loans and common stocks as they
are illiquid and trade in inactive markets. These markets are considered inactive as a
result of the low level of trades of such investments. The RMBS investments are not
considered within the Level 3 tabular disclosure, because they have been transferred to
held to maturity category
effective October 1, 2008. Held to maturity investments are not measured at fair value on
a recurring basis and as such do not fall within the scope of ASC 820. See Note 2,
Investments for a complete discussion regarding the Companys RMBS portfolio.
- 32 -
The primary pricing sources for the Companys commercial loan and common stock portfolios
are reviewed for reasonableness, based on the Companys understanding of the respective
market. Prices may then be determined using valuation methodologies such as discounted
cash flow models, as well as matrix pricing analyses performed on non-binding quotes from
brokers or other market-makers. As of September 30, 2010, the Company did not utilize an
alternate valuation methodology for its RMBS, commercial loan or common stock portfolios.
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses for each segment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Ocean marine
|
|
$
|
127,989
|
|
|
$
|
85,539
|
|
|
$
|
145,064
|
|
|
$
|
95,334
|
|
Inland marine/fire
|
|
|
20,296
|
|
|
|
7,431
|
|
|
|
19,254
|
|
|
|
6,580
|
|
Other liability
|
|
|
305,902
|
|
|
|
254,400
|
|
|
|
272,554
|
|
|
|
225,010
|
|
Aircraft
|
|
|
84,066
|
|
|
|
9,671
|
|
|
|
118,614
|
|
|
|
23,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
538,253
|
|
|
$
|
357,041
|
|
|
$
|
555,486
|
|
|
$
|
350,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our long tail business is primarily in ocean marine liability, aircraft and non-marine
liability insurance. These classes historically have extended periods of time between the
occurrence of an insurable event, reporting the claim to the Company and final
settlement. In such cases, we estimate reserves, with the possibility of making several
adjustments, because of emerging differences in actual versus expected loss development,
which may result from shock losses (large losses), changes in loss payout patterns and
material adjustments to case reserves due to adverse or favorable judicial or arbitral
results during this time period.
By contrast, other classes of insurance that we write, such as property, which includes
certain ocean marine classes (hull and cargo) and our inland marine/fire segment, and
claims-made non-marine liability, historically have had shorter periods of time between
the occurrence of an insurable event, reporting of the claim to the Company and final
settlement. The reserves for these classes are estimated as described above, but these
reserves are less likely to be readjusted, because it is not likely that they will have
significant differences resulting from expected loss development, shock or large losses,
changes in loss payout patterns and material adjustments to case reserves over their
short tails.
As the Company increases its production in its other liability lines of business, its
reported loss reserves from period to period may vary depending upon the long tail, short
tail and product mix within this segment. Our professional liability class, for example,
is written on a claims-made basis, but other sources of recent production, such as excess
workers compensation, are derived from liability classes written on an occurrence basis.
Therefore, the overall level of loss reserves reported by the Company at the end of any
reporting period may vary as a function of the level of writings achieved in each of
these classes.
In 2001, the Company recorded losses in its aircraft line of business as a result of the
terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 on the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and the
hijacked airliner that crashed in Pennsylvania (collectively, the WTC Attack). At the
time, because of the amount of the potential liability to our insureds (United Airlines
and American Airlines) occasioned by the WTC Attack, we established reserves based upon
our estimate of our insureds policy limits for gross and net liability losses. In 2004
we determined that a reduction in the loss reserves relating to the terrorist attacks of
September 11, 2001 on the Pentagon and the hijacked airliner that crashed in Pennsylvania
was warranted, because a significant number of claims that could have been made against
our insureds were waived by prospective claimants when they opted to participate in the
September 11th Victim Compensation Fund of 2001 (the Fund), and the statutes of
limitations for wrongful death in New York and for bodily injury and property damage,
generally, had expired, the latter on September 11, 2004. Our analysis of claims against
our insureds, undertaken in conjunction with the industrys lead underwriters in London,
indicated that, because such a significant number of claims potentially emanating from
the attack on the Pentagon and the crash in Shanksville had been filed with the Fund, or
were time barred as a result of the expiration of relevant statutes of limitations, those
same claims would not be made against our insureds. Therefore, we concluded that our
insureds liability and our ultimate insured loss would be substantially reduced.
Consequently, we re-estimated our insureds potential liability for the terrorist attacks
of September 11, 2001 on the Pentagon and the hijacked airliner that crashed in
Pennsylvania, and in 2004 we reduced our gross and net loss reserves by $16.3 million and
$8.3 million, respectively.
- 33 -
In light of the magnitude of the potential losses to our insureds resulting from the WTC
Attack, we did not reduce reserves for these losses until we had a high degree of
certainty that a substantial amount of these claims were waived by victims
participation in the Fund, or were time barred by the expiry of statutes of limitations,
and we did not reach that level of certainty until September 2004, when the last of the
significant statutes of limitations, that applicable to bodily injury and property
damage, expired.
In 2006, the Company recorded adverse loss development of approximately $850,000 in the
aircraft line of business resulting primarily from losses assumed from the WTC Attack
which were partially offset by a reduction in reserves relating to the loss sustained at
the Pentagon after re-estimating the reserve based upon lower than expected settlements
of claims paid during the year.
In February 2010, the Company paid approximately $33 million in gross claims with respect
to the WTC Attack. The ceded recovery with respect to this claim is approximately $22
million. While the claim payment adversely impacted cash flows from operations, it did
not have a substantial impact on results of operations or financial position. Several
reinsurers are currently disputing payment of the recovery to the Company based upon
their denial of any obligation to pay property settlements and their interpretation as to
the number of occurrences as defined in the aircraft ceded reinsurance treaties. The
Company intends to vigorously pursue such balances through arbitrations, settlements or
commutations, if necessary, but an unfavorable resolution of such collection efforts
could have a material adverse impact to our results of operations.
The process of establishing reserves for claims involves uncertainties and requires the
use of informed estimates and judgments. Our estimates and judgments may be revised as
claims develop and as additional experience and other data become available and are
reviewed, as new or improved methodologies are developed or as current laws change. The
Company realized $2.7 million in favorable development for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 largely as a result of favorable reported loss trends arising from the
ocean marine line of business although offset by adverse development in the professional
liability class. The Company realized $13.2 million in favorable development for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 as a result of favorable reported loss trends arising
from the ocean marine and other liability lines of business as well as recoveries in the
aviation line of business. Other than specifically disclosed herein, there were no
significant changes in assumptions made in the evaluation of loss reserves during 2010.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement
The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company discloses significant accounting policies in the notes to its financial
statements. Management considers certain accounting policies to be critical with respect
to the understanding of the Companys financial statements. Such policies require
significant management judgment and the resulting estimates have a material effect on
reported results and will vary to the extent that future events affect such estimates and
cause them to differ from the estimates provided currently. These critical accounting
policies include unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses, allowance for doubtful
accounts, impairment of investments, limited partnerships and trading portfolios,
reinstatement reinsurance premiums and stock compensation.
The Company maintains reserves for the future payment of losses and loss adjustment
expenses with respect to both case (reported) and IBNR (incurred but not reported) losses
under insurance policies issued by the Company. IBNR losses are those losses, based upon
historical experience, industry loss data and underwriter expectations, that the Company
estimates will be reported under these policies. Case loss reserves are determined by
evaluating reported claims on the basis of the type of loss involved, knowledge of the
circumstances surrounding the claim and the policy provisions relating to the type of
loss. Case reserves can be difficult to estimate depending upon the class of business,
claim complexity, judicial interpretations and legislative changes that affect the
estimation process. Case reserves are reviewed and monitored on a regular basis, which
may result in changes (favorable or unfavorable) to the initial estimate until the claim
is ultimately paid and settled. Unpaid losses with respect to asbestos/environmental
risks are difficult for management to estimate and require considerable judgment due to
the uncertainty regarding the significant issues surrounding such claims. Unpaid losses
with respect to catastrophe losses, such as hurricanes Katrina and Rita that occurred in
2005 and hurricanes Ike and Gustav in 2008, are also difficult to estimate due to the
high severity of the risks we insure. Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses amounted
to $538.3 million and $555.5 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance amounted to
$357.0 million and $350.4 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. Management continually reviews and updates the estimates for unpaid losses,
and any changes resulting therefrom are reflected in operating results currently. The
potential for future adverse or favorable loss development is highly uncertain and
subject to a variety of factors including, but not limited to, court decisions,
legislative actions and inflation.
The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on managements review of amounts due from
insolvent or financially impaired companies. Allowances are estimated for both premium
receivables and reinsurance receivables. Management continually reviews and updates such
estimates for any changes in the financial status of companies. The allowance for
doubtful accounts for both premiums and reinsurance receivables amounted to $16.1 million and $17.9 million as
of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
- 34 -
Impairment of investments, included in realized investment gains or losses, results from
declines in the fair value of investments which are considered by management to be
other-than-temporary.
Impairment of investments, included in realized investment gains or losses, results from
declines in the fair value of investments which are considered by management to be
other-than-temporary. Management reviews investments for impairment based upon specific
criteria that include the duration and extent of declines in fair value of the security
below its cost or amortized cost. The Company performs a qualitative and quantitative
review of all securities in a loss position in order to determine if any impairment is
considered to be other-than-temporary. The Company also reviews all securities with any
rating agency declines during the reporting period. This review includes considering the
effect of rising interest rates and the Companys intent and ability to hold impaired
securities in the foreseeable future to recoup any losses. In addition to subjecting its
securities to the objective tests of percent declines in fair value and downgrades by
major rating agencies, when it determines whether declines in the fair value of its
securities are other-than-temporary, the Company also considers the facts and
circumstances that may have caused the declines in the value of such securities. As to
any specific security, it may consider general market conditions, changes in interest
rates, adverse changes in the regulatory environment of the issuer, the duration for
which the Company expects to hold the security and the length of any forecasted recovery.
Effective April 1, 2009, under ASC 320 and ASC 958,
Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
impairment is considered to be other than temporary if
an entity (1) intends to sell the security, (2) more likely than not will be required to
sell the security before recovering its amortized cost basis, or (3) does not expect to
recover the securitys entire amortized cost basis. The OTTI of $0.3 million and $0.5
million recognized for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009,
respectively, resulted from the Companys intention to sell certain U.S. Treasury and
other securities under circumstances in which those securities are not expected to
recover their entire amortized cost prior to sale. Credit impairment occurs under ASC 320
if the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security is
less than the amortized cost basis of the security. There were no credit impairments
recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Gross
unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturity investments available for sale amounted to
approximately $0.3 million and $0, respectively, at September 30, 2010. Gross unrealized
gains and losses on fixed maturity investments available for sale amounted to
approximately $3.9 million and $(0.7) million, respectively, at December 31, 2009. The
Company believes the unrealized losses are temporary and result from changes in market
conditions, including interest rates or sector spreads.
The Company has investments in residential RMBS amounting to $52.5 million (amortized
value) at September 30, 2010. These securities are classified as held to maturity after
the Company transferred these holdings from the available for sale portfolio effective
October 1, 2008. Upon acquisition of the RMBS portfolio and prior to October 1, 2008, the
Company was uncertain as to the duration for which it would hold the RMBS portfolio and
appropriately classified such securities as available for sale.
The Company utilizes the equity method of accounting to account for its limited
partnership hedge fund investments. Under the equity method, the Company records all
changes in the underlying value of the limited partnership to net investment income in
results of operations. Net investment income derived from investments in limited
partnerships amounted to $14.0 million and $20.5 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. See Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk with respect to market risks associated with investments
in limited partnership hedge funds.
The Company maintained a commercial loan portfolio at September 30, 2010 consisting of
commercial middle market loans. As a result of utilizing the fair value election under
ASC 825 on these investments, they are marked to market with the change recognized in net
investment income during the current period. Any realized gains or losses resulting from
the sales of such securities are also recognized in net investment income. The Company
recorded $0 and $2.1 million in commercial loan portfolio income before expenses for each
of the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. See Item 3
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk with respect to market risks
associated with investments in illiquid investments.
Reinsurance reinstatement premiums are recorded, as a result of losses incurred by the
Company, in accordance with the provisions of our reinsurance contracts. Upon the
occurrence of a large severity or catastrophe loss, the Company may be obligated to pay
additional reinstatement premiums under its excess of loss reinsurance treaties up to the
amount of the original premium paid under such treaties. There were no reinsurance
reinstatement premiums incurred for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
The Company records compensation costs at the fair value of all share options, restricted
shares units, deferred share units and performance share units over their related vesting
period or service period. Total stock compensation cost recognized in earnings for all
share-based incentive compensation awards was approximately $2.5 million and $1.6 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted ASC 820, which establishes a consistent
framework for measuring fair value. The framework is based on the inputs used in
valuation and gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and requires
that observable inputs be used in the valuations when available. The disclosure of fair
value estimates in the ASC 820
hierarchy is based on whether the significant inputs into the valuation are observable.
For an updated discussion of the application of estimates and assumptions around the
valuation of investments, see Fair value measurements.
- 35 -
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The investment portfolio has exposure to market risks, which include the effect on the
investment portfolio of adverse changes in interest rates, credit quality, hedge fund
values, and illiquid securities including commercial loans and residential
mortgage-backed securities. Interest rate risk includes the changes in the fair value of
fixed maturities based upon changes in interest rates. Credit quality risk includes the
risk of default by issuers of debt securities. Hedge fund risk includes the potential
loss from the diminution in the value of the underlying investment of the hedge fund.
Illiquid securities risk includes exposure to the private placement market including its
lack of liquidity and volatility in changes in market prices. The only significant change
to the Companys exposure to market risks during the nine months ended September 30, 2010
as compared to those disclosed in the Companys financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2009 related to the level of investments in limited partnerships. The
investment in limited partnerships amounted to $132.2 million and $152.0 million as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Pursuant to certain covenants in the Agreement and Plan of Merger with ProSight Specialty
Insurance Holdings, Inc., dated July 15, 2010, the Company has submitted redemption
notices for all of its hedge fund investments except for its investment in Tiptree
Financial Partners, LP. The Companys investment in Tiptree Financial Partners, LP is
valued at approximately $35 million at September 30, 2010.
At September 30, 2010, the Company held $3.0 million of commercial loans, which consisted
of loans to middle market companies. The Company has elected to account for such debt
instruments utilizing the fair value election under SFAS 159. Accordingly, the changes in
the fair value of these debt instruments are recorded in investment income. The markets
for these types of investments can be illiquid and, therefore, the price obtained from
dealers on these investments is subject to change, depending upon the underlying market
conditions of these investments, including the potential for downgrades or defaults on
the underlying collateral of the investment. The Company seeks to mitigate market risk
associated with commercial loans by maintaining a small portion of its investment
portfolio in commercial loans. As such, less than 1% of the Companys investment
portfolio is maintained in such investments at September 30, 2010.
Hedge fund risk includes the potential loss from the diminution in the value of the
underlying investment of the hedge fund. Hedge fund investments are subject to various
economic and market risks. The risks associated with hedge fund investments may be
substantially greater than the risks associated with fixed income investments.
Consequently, our hedge fund portfolio may be more volatile, and the risk of loss
greater, than that associated with fixed income investments. In accordance with the
investment policy for each of the Companys New York insurance company subsidiaries,
hedge fund investments are limited to the greater of 30% of invested assets or 50% of
policyholders surplus. The Companys Arizona insurance subsidiary does not invest in
hedge funds.
The Company also seeks to mitigate market risk associated with its investments in hedge
funds by maintaining a diversified portfolio of hedge fund investments. Diversification
is achieved through the use of many investment managers employing a variety of different
investment strategies in determining the underlying characteristics of their hedge funds.
The Company is dependent upon these managers to obtain market prices for the underlying
investments of the hedge funds. Some of these investments may be difficult to value and
actual values may differ from reported amounts. The hedge funds in which we invest
usually impose limitations on the timing of withdrawals from the hedge funds (most are
within 90 days), and may affect our liquidity.
- 36 -
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report was made under
the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our President and
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based upon this evaluation, our
President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures (a) are effective to ensure that information required
to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act is
timely recorded, processed, summarized and reported and (b) include, without limitation,
controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
us in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls
There have been no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting
(as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act) that occurred during the
period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
- 37 -
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Two former pool members, Utica Mutual Insurance Company (Utica Mutual) and Arkwright
Mutual Insurance Company (Arkwright), which is currently part of the FM Global Group,
withdrew from the pools in 1994 and 1996, respectively, and retained the liability for
their effective pool participation for all loss reserves, including losses incurred but
not reported (IBNR) and unearned premium reserves attributable to policies effective
prior to their withdrawal from the pools. In December, 2007, MMO, which has been managing
the pools without compensation pursuant to a Restated Management Agreement entered into
with pool members in 1986, served notice on the pool members of its intent to terminate
the Restated Management Agreement, effective December 31, 2009. Two of the pool members,
Utica Mutual and Arkwright, rejected MMOs notice of intent to terminate, and MMO
initiated an arbitration against them, seeking an arbitral award, confirming its right to
terminate the Restated Management Agreement, or in the alternative, seeking a reformation
of the Restated Management Agreement. An arbitration hearing was held in January and
February, 2010, but an award is not expected until December 2010, at the earliest.
The Company is not aware of any facts that could result in any possible defaults by
either Arkwright or Utica Mutual with respect to their pool obligations, which might
impact liquidity or results of operations of the Company, but there can be no assurance
that such events will not occur.
In February 2010, the Company paid approximately $33 million in gross claims with respect
to the WTC Attack. The ceded recovery with respect to this claim is approximately $22
million. While the claim payment adversely impacted cash flows from operations, it did
not have a substantial impact on results of operations or financial position. Several
reinsurers are currently disputing payment of the recovery to the Company based upon
their denial of any obligation to pay property settlements and their interpretation as to
the number of occurrences as defined in the aircraft ceded reinsurance treaties. The
Company intends to vigorously pursue such balances through arbitrations, settlements or
commutations, if necessary, but an unfavorable resolution of such collection efforts
could have a material adverse impact to our results of operations.
The Companys insurance subsidiaries are subject to disputes, including litigation and
arbitration, arising out of the ordinary course of business. The Companys estimates of
the costs of settling such matters are reflected in its reserves for losses and loss
expenses, and the Company does not believe that the ultimate outcome of such matters will
have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
Between July 16 and July 26, 2010, four substantially similar putative class action
lawsuits were commenced by stockholders of NYMAGIC against the Company, its board of
directors and ProSight in the Supreme Court of the State of New York for the County of
New York challenging the proposed merger, captioned, Gross v. NYMAGIC, Inc., No.
650979/2010 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. filed July 16, 2010), Kahn v. Trumbull, No. 651033/2010 (N.Y.
Sup. Ct. filed July 20, 2010), Cambridge Retirement System v. NYMAGIC, Inc., No.
651058/2010 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. filed July 21, 2010), and Walker v. NYMAGIC, Inc., No.
109851/2010 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. filed July 26, 2010), respectively. The complaints, each of
which purports to be brought as a class action on behalf of all of the Companys
stockholders, excluding the defendants and their affiliates, allege that the
consideration that stockholders will receive in connection with the merger is inadequate
and that the Companys directors breached their fiduciary duties to stockholders in
negotiating and approving the merger agreement. The complaints further allege that the
Company and/or ProSight aided and abetted the alleged breaches by the Companys
directors. The complaints seek various forms of relief, including injunctive relief to
prevent consummation of the merger.
On September 1, 2010, the actions were consolidated and, on September 3, 2010, the
plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint. In addition to the allegations set
forth above, the consolidated amended complaint also alleges that the Companys directors
breached their fiduciary duties in disseminating incomplete and/or inaccurate information
regarding the proposed merger, and added Goldman, Sachs & Co. as a defendant based on
allegations that it aided and abetted the directors alleged breach of their fiduciary
duties.
Although the Company believes that the claims asserted in the actions are without merit,
on October 22, 2010, the parties entered into a memorandum of understanding reflecting an
agreement in principle to settle and dismiss the actions on the basis that certain
additional disclosures would be made in the Proxy Statement provided to the Companys
shareholders. The proposed settlement is subject to court approval and other conditions.
- 38 -
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There were no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, except as noted below.
The Failure to Complete the Pending Sale of the Company Could have a Materially Adverse
Impact.
On July 15, 2010, we entered into a definitive agreement to be acquired by ProSight
Specialty Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the Merger). ProSight Specialty Insurance Holdings,
Inc. (ProSight) was founded by a group of senior executives from the property and
casualty industry and is backed by affiliates of TPG Capital and GS Capital Partners.
Consummation of the Merger is subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement and
Plan of Merger, including, but not limited to, the approval of the Companys shareholders
and obtaining certain required regulatory approvals. There can be no assurance that the
Companys shareholders will approve the Merger or that the other conditions to the
completion of the Merger will be satisfied. If the Merger is not completed for any
reason, the price of the Companys common stock will likely decline to the extent that
the market price of the common stock reflects market assumptions that the Merger will be
completed. Additionally, the Company is subject to additional risks in connection with
the Merger, including: (1) the occurrence of an event, change or circumstance that could
give rise to the payment of a termination fee to ProSight pursuant to the terms of the
Agreement and Plan of Merger, (2) the outcome of any legal proceedings that have been or
may be instituted against the Company and others relating to the transactions
contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger, (3) the failure of the Merger to close
for any reason, (4) the restrictions imposed on the Companys business, properties and
operations pursuant to the affirmative and negative covenants set forth in the Agreement
and Plan of Merger and the potential impact of such covenants on the Companys business,
(5) the risk that the proposed transaction will divert managements attention resulting
in a potential disruption of the Companys current business plan, (6) potential
difficulties in employee retention arising from the Merger, (7) the effect of the
announcement of the Merger on the Companys business relationships, operating results and
business generally and (8) the amount of fees, expenses and charges incurred by the
Company in connection with the Merger.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
- 39 -
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
Charter of NYMAGIC, INC. (filed as Exhibit 99.1
to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on December 16, 2003 (File No. 1-11238) and
incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws. (filed as Exhibit
3.3 to the Companys Current Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999
(Commission File No. 1-11238) and incorporated
herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
Executive Severance Agreement, dated as of
October 8, 2010, between the Company and Paul J.
Hart (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 22,
2010 (file No. 1-11238) and incorporated herein
by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
Executive Severance Agreement, dated as of
October 8, 2010, between the Company and Thomas
J. Iacopelli (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
October 22, 2010 (file No. 1-11238) and
incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*31.1
|
|
|
Certification of George R. Trumbull, Chief
Executive Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*31.2
|
|
|
Certification of Thomas J. Iacopelli, Chief
Financial Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*32.1
|
|
|
Certification of George R. Trumbull, Chief
Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*32.2
|
|
|
Certification of Thomas J. Iacopelli, Chief
Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYMAGIC, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: November 9, 2010
|
/s/ George R. Trumbull
|
|
|
George R. Trumbull
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 9, 2010
|
/s/ Thomas J. Iacopelli
|
|
|
Thomas J. Iacopelli
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
- 40 -
Grafico Azioni Nymagic (NYSE:NYM)
Storico
Da Dic 2024 a Gen 2025
Grafico Azioni Nymagic (NYSE:NYM)
Storico
Da Gen 2024 a Gen 2025