ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
Wesco Aircraft Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2019
|
|
September 30,
2018
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
45,418
|
|
|
$
|
46,222
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,909 and $2,877 at June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively
|
333,446
|
|
|
283,775
|
|
Inventories
|
879,565
|
|
|
884,212
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
18,110
|
|
|
15,291
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
2,602
|
|
|
2,017
|
|
Total current assets
|
1,279,141
|
|
|
1,231,517
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
54,186
|
|
|
44,205
|
|
Deferred debt issuance costs, net
|
1,848
|
|
|
2,827
|
|
Goodwill
|
266,644
|
|
|
266,644
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
152,241
|
|
|
163,438
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
67,823
|
|
|
65,135
|
|
Other assets
|
14,300
|
|
|
15,710
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
1,836,183
|
|
|
$
|
1,789,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
$
|
216,400
|
|
|
$
|
180,494
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
52,569
|
|
|
42,767
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
4,111
|
|
|
2,295
|
|
Capital lease obligations, current portion
|
1,877
|
|
|
2,205
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
|
58,000
|
|
|
74,000
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
332,957
|
|
|
301,761
|
|
Capital lease obligations, less current portion
|
1,475
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion
|
759,712
|
|
|
771,777
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
3,507
|
|
|
2,803
|
|
Other liabilities
|
12,440
|
|
|
18,337
|
|
Total liabilities
|
1,110,091
|
|
|
1,097,007
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share: 50,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 950,000,000 shares authorized, 99,749,063 and 99,557,885 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively
|
100
|
|
|
99
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
451,544
|
|
|
444,531
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
(88,788
|
)
|
|
(82,980
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
363,236
|
|
|
330,819
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
726,092
|
|
|
692,469
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
1,836,183
|
|
|
$
|
1,789,476
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
Wesco Aircraft Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Income
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Net sales
|
$
|
442,374
|
|
|
$
|
410,359
|
|
|
$
|
1,264,159
|
|
|
$
|
1,163,633
|
|
Cost of sales
|
336,504
|
|
|
306,162
|
|
|
951,200
|
|
|
859,277
|
|
Gross profit
|
105,870
|
|
|
104,197
|
|
|
312,959
|
|
|
304,356
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
83,368
|
|
|
74,869
|
|
|
238,539
|
|
|
217,260
|
|
Income from operations
|
22,502
|
|
|
29,328
|
|
|
74,420
|
|
|
87,096
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
(12,878
|
)
|
|
(12,717
|
)
|
|
(38,180
|
)
|
|
(36,520
|
)
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
(630
|
)
|
|
239
|
|
|
(1,161
|
)
|
|
391
|
|
Income before income taxes and equity method investment impairment charge
|
8,994
|
|
|
16,850
|
|
|
35,079
|
|
|
50,967
|
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
7,377
|
|
|
(6,096
|
)
|
|
(405
|
)
|
|
(25,587
|
)
|
Income before equity method investment impairment charge
|
16,371
|
|
|
10,754
|
|
|
34,674
|
|
|
25,380
|
|
Equity method investment impairment charge, net of income taxes
|
(2,257
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2,257
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Net income
|
14,114
|
|
|
10,754
|
|
|
32,417
|
|
|
25,380
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of income taxes
|
(1,576
|
)
|
|
(3,106
|
)
|
|
(5,808
|
)
|
|
1,009
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
$
|
12,538
|
|
|
$
|
7,648
|
|
|
$
|
26,609
|
|
|
$
|
26,389
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
99,647,188
|
|
|
99,180,632
|
|
|
99,586,122
|
|
|
99,137,710
|
|
Diluted
|
100,205,475
|
|
|
99,739,217
|
|
|
100,029,458
|
|
|
99,396,613
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
Wesco Aircraft Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
$
|
32,417
|
|
|
$
|
25,380
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
21,327
|
|
|
21,909
|
|
Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs
|
3,914
|
|
|
4,300
|
|
Bad debt and sales return reserve
|
232
|
|
|
503
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
7,418
|
|
|
6,286
|
|
Net inventory provision
|
(1,555
|
)
|
|
10,976
|
|
Equity method investment impairment charge
|
2,966
|
|
|
—
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
(24
|
)
|
|
523
|
|
Other non-cash items
|
(556
|
)
|
|
(678
|
)
|
Subtotal
|
66,139
|
|
|
69,199
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
(50,321
|
)
|
|
(47,008
|
)
|
Income taxes receivable
|
(582
|
)
|
|
995
|
|
Inventories
|
6,219
|
|
|
(76,884
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
(6,476
|
)
|
|
1,608
|
|
Accounts payable
|
33,400
|
|
|
9,122
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
(870
|
)
|
|
14,648
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
1,805
|
|
|
9,255
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
49,314
|
|
|
(19,065
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
(16,481
|
)
|
|
(4,009
|
)
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(16,481
|
)
|
|
(4,009
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from short-term borrowings
|
57,000
|
|
|
67,500
|
|
Repayment of short-term borrowings
|
(73,000
|
)
|
|
(41,000
|
)
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
(15,000
|
)
|
|
(15,000
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
—
|
|
|
(1,900
|
)
|
Repayment of capital lease obligations
|
(2,094
|
)
|
|
(2,207
|
)
|
Net proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
37
|
|
|
63
|
|
Settlement on restricted stock tax withholding
|
(442
|
)
|
|
(126
|
)
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(33,499
|
)
|
|
7,330
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents
|
(138
|
)
|
|
(293
|
)
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(804
|
)
|
|
(16,037
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
46,222
|
|
|
61,625
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$
|
45,418
|
|
|
$
|
45,588
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
Wesco Aircraft Holdings, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Wesco Aircraft Holdings, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (referred to herein as Wesco or the Company) prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. The financial statements presented herein have not been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm but include all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for fair statement of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the period. However, these results are not necessarily indicative of results for any other interim period or for the full fiscal year. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make certain estimates and assumptions for the reporting periods covered by the financial statements. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent liabilities. Actual amounts could differ from these estimates. Our financial statements have been prepared under the assumption that our Company will continue as a going concern.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements in accordance with GAAP have been omitted pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2018 filed with the SEC on November 16, 2018 (the 2018 Form 10-K).
Except for the changes below, no material changes have been made to our significant accounting policies disclosed in Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of the 2018 Form 10-K.
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Pursuant to Accounting Standard Codification Topic 606,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(ASC 606)
,
we
recognize revenue when our customer obtains control of promised goods or services, in an amount that reflects the consideration that we expect to receive in exchange for those goods or services. To determine revenue recognition for arrangements that we determine are within the scope of ASC 606, we perform the following five steps: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. We recognize revenue in the amount of the transaction price that is allocated to the respective performance obligation when (or as) the performance obligation is satisfied.
Typically, our master purchase contracts with our customer run for three to
five years
without minimum purchase requirements annually or for over the term of the contract, and contain termination for convenience provisions, which generally allow for our customers to terminate their contracts on short notice without meaningful penalties. Pursuant to ASC 606, we have concluded that for revenue recognition purposes, our customers’ purchase orders (P.O.'s) are considered contracts, which are supplemented by certain contract terms such as service fee arrangements and variable price considerations in our master purchase contracts. The P.O.'s are typically fulfilled within
one year
.
Our contracts for hardware and chemical product sales have a single performance obligation. Revenues from these contract sales are recognized when the customer obtains control of our products, which occurs at a point in time, typically upon delivery in accordance with the terms of the sales contract. Services under our hardware just-in-time (JIT) arrangements are provided by us contemporaneously with the delivery of these products and are not separately identifiable from the products, and as such, once the products are delivered, we do not have a post-delivery obligation to provide services to the customer. Accordingly, the price of such services is generally included in the price of the products delivered to the customer, and revenue is recognized upon delivery of the products. Payment is generally due within
30
to
90
days of delivery; therefore, our contracts do not create significant financing components. Warranties are limited to replacement of goods that are defective upon delivery. The Company does not provide service-type warranties.
Our chemical management services (CMS) contracts include the sale of chemical products as well as services such as product procurement, receiving and quality inspection, warehouse and inventory management, and waste disposal. The CMS contracts represent an end-to-end integrated chemical management solution. While each of the products and various services benefits the customer, we determined that they are a single output in the context of the CMS contract due to the significant
commercial integration of these products and services. Therefore, chemical products and services provided under a CMS contract represent a single performance obligation and revenue is recognized over time for these contracts using product deliveries as our output measure of progress under the CMS contract to depict the transfer of control to the customer.
We report revenue on a gross or net basis in our presentation of net sales and costs of sales based on management’s assessment of whether we act as a principal or agent in the transaction. If we are the principal in the transaction and have control of the specified good or service before that good or service is transferred to a customer, the transactions are recorded as gross in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. If we do not act as a principal in the transaction, the transactions are recorded on a net basis in the consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive income. This assessment requires significant judgment to evaluate indicators of control within our contracts. We base our judgment on various indicators that include whether we take possession of the products, whether we are responsible for their acceptability, whether we have inventory risk, and whether we have discretion in establishing the price paid by the customer. The majority of our revenue is recorded on a gross basis with the exception of certain gas, energy and chemical management service contracts that are recorded on a net basis.
With respect to variable consideration,
we apply judgment in estimating its impact to determine the amount of revenue to recognize.
Sales rebates and profit-sharing arrangements are accounted for as a reduction to gross sales and recorded based upon estimates at the time products are sold. These estimates are based upon historical experience for similar programs and products. We review such rebates and profit-sharing arrangements on an ongoing basis and accruals are adjusted, if necessary, as additional information becomes available. We provide allowances for credits and returns based on historic experience and adjust such allowances as considered necessary. To date, such provisions have been within the range of our expectations and the allowance established.
Returns and refunds are allowed only for materials that are defective or not compliant with the customer’s order.
Sales tax collected from customers is excluded from net sales in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
We have determined that sales backlog is not a relevant measure of our business. Few, if any, of our contracts include minimum purchase requirements, annually or over the term of the agreement. As a result, we have no material sales backlog.
Equity Method Investment
We apply the equity method of accounting for investments in which we have significant influence but not a controlling interest. Our APAC reporting unit has an equity investment in a joint venture in China, the carrying value of which was
$7.4 million
and
$10.4 million
as of June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively, and was included in “Other assets” in the unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the three months ended June 30, 2019, we recorded an impairment charge of
$3.0 million
(
$2.3 million
net of income taxes) resulting from a decline in value below the carrying amount of our equity method investment which we determined was other than temporary in nature.
Note 2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Changes to GAAP are established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in the form of Accounting Standards Updates (ASUs) to the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification (ASC).
We consider the applicability and impact of all ASUs. ASUs not listed below were assessed and determined to be either not applicable or are expected to have minimal impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
New Accounting Standards Issued
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04,
Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment
, which simplifies the current requirements for testing goodwill for impairment by eliminating the second step of the two-step impairment test to measure the amount of an impairment loss. ASU 2017-04 is effective for the Company in fiscal year 2021, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period, and all annual and interim reporting periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842).
ASU 2016-02 is amended by ASU 2018-01, ASU2018-10, ASU 2018-11, ASU 2018-20 and ASU 2019-01, which FASB issued in January 2018, July 2018, July 2018, December 2018 and March 2019, respectively (collectively, the amended ASU 2016-02). The amended ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a right-of-use asset, representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term, and a lease liability for all leases with terms greater than 12 months. The recognition, measurement, and presentation of
expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee have not significantly changed from current GAAP. The amended ASU 2016-02 retains a distinction between finance leases (i.e. capital leases under current GAAP) and operating leases. The classification criteria for distinguishing between finance leases and operating leases will be substantially similar to the classification criteria for distinguishing between capital leases and operating leases under current GAAP. The amended ASU 2016-02 also requires qualitative and quantitative disclosures designed to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. A modified retrospective transition approach is permitted to be used when an entity adopts the amended ASU 2016-02, which includes a number of optional practical expedients that entities may elect to apply. The amended ASU 2016-02 is effective for the Company in fiscal year 2020 and interim periods therein, with early application permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on our consolidated financial statements. We have compiled our worldwide lease population, completed our evaluation of the completeness of our lease population and are in the process of uploading our leases into a new cloud-based lease accounting system. The adoption of the amended ASU 2016-02 is expected to result in material increases to our balance sheet for the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities. As of September 30, 2018, total future minimum payments under our operating leases amounted to
$50.8 million
.
Adopted Accounting Standards
On October 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2016-01,
Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,
which affects the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option and the presentation and disclosure requirements of financial instruments. The adoption of ASU 2016-01 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
On October 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2017-09,
Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting,
which specifies the modification accounting applicable to any entity that changes the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The adoption of ASU 2017-09 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).
ASU 2014-09 is amended by ASU 2015-14, ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10, ASU 2016-11, ASU 2016-12, ASU 2016-20, ASU 2017-10, ASU 2017-13 and ASU 2017-14, which the FASB issued in
August 2015, March 2016, April 2016, May 2016, May 2016, December 2016, May 2017, September 2017 and November 2017, respectively (collectively, the amended ASU 2014-09). The amended ASU 2014-09 provides a single comprehensive model for the recognition of revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. It requires an entity to recognize revenue when the entity transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The amended ASU 2014-09 creates a five-step model that requires entities to exercise judgment when considering the terms of contract(s), which includes (1) identifying the contract(s) with the customer, (2) identifying the separate performance obligations in the contract, (3) determining the transaction price, (4) allocating the transaction price to the separate performance obligations, and (5) recognizing revenue as each performance obligation is satisfied. The amended ASU 2014-09 requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including qualitative and quantitative information about contracts with customers, significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract.
Effective October 1, 2018, we adopted the amended ASU 2014-09 (ASC 606)
using the modified retrospective method of adoption, which resulted in no changes to our opening consolidated balance sheet at the beginning of October 1, 2018. Our initial and incremental contract acquisition costs including sign up commissions and set up costs, which are required to be capitalized under ASC 606, are insignificant and expensed as incurred. Our revenues recognized under ASC 606 for the three and
nine months ended June 30, 2019
were not materially different from what would have been recognized under the previous revenue standard, ASC 605, that is superseded. Prior period consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive income remain unchanged.
We have designed and implemented internal controls, policies and processes to comply with ASC 606
.
The additional disclosures required by ASC 606 are included in Note 1 and Note 9.
Note 3. Inventory
Our inventory is comprised solely of finished goods. We record provisions to write down excess and obsolete (E&O) inventory to estimated net realizable value.
We continually assess and refine our methodology for evaluating E&O inventory based on current facts and circumstances. Our hardware inventory E&O assessment requires the use of subjective judgments and estimates including the forecasted demand for each part. The forecasted demand considers a number of factors, including historical sales trends, current and forecasted customer demand, including customer liability provisions based on selected contractual rights, consideration of available sales channels and the time horizon over which we expect the hardware part to be sold.
During the
three months ended June 30,
2019
and
2018
, net adjustments to cost of sales related to E&O inventory related activities were
$(4.1) million
and
$6.2 million
, respectively. The net adjustments for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 reflect a combination of additional expense for E&O related provisions (
$2.4 million
and
$12.9 million
, respectively) offset by sales and disposals (
$6.5 million
and
$6.7 million
, respectively) of inventory for which an E&O provision was provided previously through expense recognized in prior periods. During the
nine months ended June 30, 2019
and
2018
, net adjustments to cost of sales related to E&O inventory related activities were
$(1.6) million
and
$11.0 million
, respectively. The net adjustments for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 reflect a combination of additional expense for E&O related provisions (
$17.0 million
and
$28.1 million
, respectively) offset by sales and disposals (
$18.6 million
and
$17.1 million
, respectively) of inventory for which an E&O provision was provided previously through expense recognized in prior periods. We believe that these amounts appropriately write-down our inventory to its net realizable value.
Note 4. Goodwill
As of
June 30, 2019
, goodwill consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
APAC
|
|
Total
|
Goodwill as of September 30, 2018, gross
|
|
$
|
773,384
|
|
|
$
|
51,190
|
|
|
$
|
16,955
|
|
|
$
|
841,529
|
|
Accumulated impairment
|
|
(569,201
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(5,684
|
)
|
|
(574,885
|
)
|
Goodwill as of September 30, 2018, net
|
|
204,183
|
|
|
51,190
|
|
|
11,271
|
|
|
266,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes during the period
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill as of June 30, 2019, gross
|
|
773,384
|
|
|
51,190
|
|
|
16,955
|
|
|
841,529
|
|
Accumulated impairment
|
|
(569,201
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(5,684
|
)
|
|
(574,885
|
)
|
Goodwill as of June 30, 2019, net
|
|
$
|
204,183
|
|
|
$
|
51,190
|
|
|
$
|
11,271
|
|
|
$
|
266,644
|
|
Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Derivative Financial Instruments
Our primary objective in using financial derivatives is to reduce the volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and changes in interest rates. Our use of financial derivatives exposes us to credit risk to the extent that associated counter-parties may be unable to meet the terms of the derivatives. We, however, seek to mitigate such risks by limiting our counter-parties to major financial institutions. In addition, the potential risk of loss with any one counter-party resulting from this type of credit risk is monitored. Management does not expect material losses as a result of defaults by counter-parties.
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
Our objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish these objectives, we primarily use interest rate swaps as part of our interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty in exchange for our making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. We have
three
interest rate swap agreements outstanding, which we have designated as cash flow hedges, in order to reduce our exposure to variability in cash flows related to interest payments on a portion of our outstanding debt. The first interest rate swap agreement (the "First Swap Agreement") has an amortizing notional amount, which was
$200.0 million
on
June 30, 2019
, and matures on September 30, 2019, giving us the contractual right to pay a fixed interest rate
of
2.2625%
plus the applicable margin under the term loan B facility (as defined in Note 6 below; see Note 6 for the applicable margin). The remaining
two
interest rate swap agreements (the “Remaining Swap Agreements”), entered into on May 14, 2018, have variable notional amounts which initially will increase in amount approximately equal to amortization of the notional amount of the First Swap Agreement and then amortize thereafter. The Remaining Swap Agreements totaled
$198.3 million
on
June 30, 2019
, and mature on February 26, 2021, giving us the contractual right to pay a fixed interest rate of
2.79%
plus the applicable margin under the term loan B facility (as defined in Note 6 below; see Note 6 for the applicable margin).
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. During the
nine months ended June 30, 2019
, such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing variable-rate debt. No portion of our interest rate swap agreements is excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
Amounts reported in AOCI related to derivatives and the related deferred tax are reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on our variable-rate debt. As of
June 30, 2019
, we expect to reclassify
$3.0 million
from accumulated other comprehensive loss and the related deferred tax to earnings as an increase to interest expense over the next
12 months
when the underlying hedged item impacts earnings.
Non-Designated Derivatives
From time to time, we enter into foreign currency forward contracts to partially reduce our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations for a subsidiary's net monetary assets, which are denominated in a foreign currency. The derivatives are not designated as a hedging instrument. The change in their fair value is recognized as periodic gain or loss in the other income, net line of our consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive income. We did not have foreign currency forward contracts as of
June 30, 2019
and
September 30, 2018
.
The following table summarizes the notional principal amounts at
June 30, 2019
, and
September 30, 2018
of our outstanding interest rate swap agreements discussed above (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Notional
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2019
|
|
September 30, 2018
|
Instruments designated as accounting hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
|
$
|
398,300
|
|
|
$
|
435,800
|
|
The following table provides the location and fair value amounts of our financial instruments, which are reported in our consolidated balance sheets as of
June 30, 2019
and
September 30, 2018
(in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Locations
|
|
June 30, 2019
|
|
September 30, 2018
|
Instruments designated as accounting hedge:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
1,045
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
|
Other assets
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
3,038
|
|
|
289
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
2,431
|
|
|
—
|
|
The following table provides the (gain) losses of our cash flow hedging instruments (net of income tax benefit), which were transferred from AOCI to interest expense on our consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive income during the three and
nine
months ended
June 30, 2019
and
2018
(in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location in Consolidated
Statements of Earnings and
Comprehensive Income
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Hedge
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
|
Interest (income) expense, net
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
$
|
841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense, net presented in the consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive income in which the above effects of cash flow hedges are recorded
|
|
$
|
12,878
|
|
|
$
|
12,717
|
|
|
$
|
38,180
|
|
|
$
|
36,520
|
|
The following table provides the effective portion of the amount of (loss) gain recognized in other comprehensive income (net of income taxes) for the three and
nine
months ended
June 30, 2019
and
2018
(in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Hedge
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
|
$
|
(1,892
|
)
|
|
$
|
(91
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,174
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,740
|
|
The following table provides a summary of changes to our AOCI related to our cash flow hedging instrument (net of income taxes) during the three and
nine
months ended
June 30, 2019
(in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AOCI - Unrealized (Loss) Gain on Hedging Instruments
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2019
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
(1,977
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,375
|
|
Change in fair value of hedging instruments
|
|
(1,892
|
)
|
|
(5,174
|
)
|
Amounts reclassified to earnings
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
(97
|
)
|
Net current period other comprehensive loss
|
|
(1,919
|
)
|
|
(5,271
|
)
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
(3,896
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,896
|
)
|
Other Financial Instruments
Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities, and the Credit Facilities (as defined below in Note 6). The carrying amounts of these instruments approximate fair value because of their short-term duration. The fair value of interest rate swap agreements is determined using pricing models that use observable market inputs as of the balance sheet date, a Level 2 measurement (as defined below). The fair value of the long-term debt instruments is determined using current applicable rates for similar instruments as of the balance sheet date, a Level 2 measurement (as defined below). The principal amounts and fair values of the debt instruments and interest rate swap agreements were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2019
|
|
September 30, 2018
|
|
Principal
Amount
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Principal
Amount
|
|
Fair
Value
|
Term loan A facility
|
$
|
345,000
|
|
|
$
|
341,550
|
|
|
$
|
360,000
|
|
|
$
|
357,840
|
|
Term loan B facility
|
440,562
|
|
|
433,514
|
|
|
440,562
|
|
|
432,192
|
|
Revolving facility
|
38,000
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
Interest rate swap contract liability (assets), net
|
5,435
|
|
|
5,435
|
|
|
(1,807
|
)
|
|
(1,807
|
)
|
Fair Value Measurement
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. To determine fair value, we primarily utilize reported market transactions and discounted cash flow analysis. We use a three-tier fair value hierarchy that maximizes the use of observable inputs and
minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques into three broad levels whereby the highest priority is given to Level 1 inputs and the lowest to Level 3 inputs. The three broad categories are:
|
|
|
Level 1:
|
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
|
Level 2:
|
Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
|
Level 3:
|
Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
|
The definition of fair value includes the consideration of nonperformance risk. Nonperformance risk refers to the risk that an obligation (either by a counter-party or us) will not be fulfilled. For financial assets traded in an active market (Level 1), the nonperformance risk is included in the market price. For certain other financial assets and liabilities (Level 2 and 3), our fair value calculations have been adjusted accordingly.
There were no transfers between the assets and liabilities under Level 1 and Level 2 during the
nine
months ended
June 30, 2019
. The following tables provide the valuation hierarchy classification of assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value and measured on a recurring basis in our consolidated balance sheets as of
June 30, 2019
and
September 30, 2018
(in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2019
|
Balance Sheet Locations
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruments designated as accounting hedge:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
Other current assets
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
3,038
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,038
|
|
|
—
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
Other liabilities
|
|
2,431
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,431
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2018
|
Balance Sheet Locations
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instrument designated as accounting hedge:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
Other current assets
|
|
$
|
1,045
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,045
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
Other assets
|
|
1,051
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
|
—
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
289
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
—
|
|
We use observable market-based inputs to calculate fair value of our interest rate swap agreements and outstanding debt instruments, in which case the measurements are classified within Level 2. If quoted or observable market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed models that use, where possible, current market‑based parameters such as interest rates, yield curves and currency rates. These measurements are classified within Level 3.
Note 6. Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2019
|
|
September 30, 2018
|
|
|
Principal
Amount
|
|
Deferred Debt Issuance Costs
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Principal
Amount
|
|
Deferred Debt Issuance Costs
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
Term loan A facility
|
|
$
|
345,000
|
|
|
$
|
(3,820
|
)
|
|
$
|
341,180
|
|
|
$
|
360,000
|
|
|
$
|
(5,842
|
)
|
|
$
|
354,158
|
|
Term loan B facility
|
|
440,562
|
|
|
(2,030
|
)
|
|
438,532
|
|
|
440,562
|
|
|
(2,943
|
)
|
|
437,619
|
|
Revolving facility
|
|
38,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
|
|
823,562
|
|
|
(5,850
|
)
|
|
817,712
|
|
|
854,562
|
|
|
(8,785
|
)
|
|
845,777
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
58,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
58,000
|
|
|
74,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
74,000
|
|
Non-current portion
|
|
$
|
765,562
|
|
|
$
|
(5,850
|
)
|
|
$
|
759,712
|
|
|
$
|
780,562
|
|
|
$
|
(8,785
|
)
|
|
$
|
771,777
|
|
Senior Secured Credit Facilities
The credit agreement, dated as of December 7, 2012 (as amended, the Credit Agreement), by and among the Company, Wesco Aircraft Hardware Corp. and the lenders and agents party thereto, which governs our senior secured credit facilities, provides for (1) a
$400.0 million
senior secured term loan A facility (the term loan A facility), (2) a
$180.0 million
revolving facility (the revolving facility) and (3) a
$525.0 million
senior secured term loan B facility (the term loan B facility). We refer to the term loan A facility, the revolving facility and the term loan B facility, together, as the “Credit Facilities.”
As of
June 30, 2019
, our outstanding indebtedness under our Credit Facilities was
$823.6 million
, which consisted of (1)
$345.0 million
of indebtedness under the term loan A facility, (2)
$38.0 million
of indebtedness under the revolving facility, and (3)
$440.6 million
of indebtedness under the term loan B facility. As of
June 30, 2019
, a
$1.0 million
letter of credit was outstanding and
$141.0 million
was available for borrowing under the revolving facility to fund our operating and investing activities without breaching any covenants contained in the Credit Agreement.
During the
nine
months ended
June 30, 2019
, we borrowed
$57.0 million
under the revolving facility, and made our required quarterly payments of
$15.0 million
on our term loan A facility and voluntary prepayments totaling
$73.0 million
on our borrowings under the revolving facility.
The interest rate for the term loan A facility is based on our Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio (as such term is defined in the Credit Agreement) as determined in the most recently delivered financial statements, with the respective margins ranging from
2.00%
to
3.00%
for Eurocurrency loans and
1.00%
to
2.00%
for ABR loans. The term loan A facility amortizes in equal quarterly installments of
1.25%
of the original principal amount of
$400.0 million
with the balance due on the earlier of (1) 90 days before the maturity of the term loan B facility, and (2) October 4, 2021. As of
June 30, 2019
, the interest rate for borrowings under the term loan A facility was
5.44%
, which approximated the effective interest rate.
The interest rate for the term loan B facility has a margin of
2.50%
per annum for Eurocurrency loans (subject to a minimum Eurocurrency rate floor of
0.75%
per annum) or
1.50%
per annum for ABR loans (subject to a minimum ABR floor of
1.75%
per annum). The term loan B facility amortizes in equal quarterly installments of
0.25%
of the original principal amount of
$525.0 million
, with the balance due at maturity on February 28, 2021. As of
June 30, 2019
, the interest rate for borrowings under the term loan B facility was
4.94%
, which approximated the effective interest rate. We have an interest rate swap agreement relating to this indebtedness, which is described in greater detail in Note 5 above.
The interest rate for the revolving facility is based on our Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio as determined in the most recently delivered financial statements, with the respective margins ranging from
2.00%
to
3.00%
for Eurocurrency loans and
1.00%
to
2.00%
for ABR loans. The revolving facility expires on the earlier of (1)
90 days
before the maturity of the term loan B facility, and (2) October 4, 2021. As of
June 30, 2019
, the weighted-average interest rate for borrowings under the revolving facility was
5.42%
.
Our borrowings under the Credit Facilities are guaranteed by us and all of our direct and indirect, wholly-owned, domestic restricted subsidiaries (subject to certain exceptions) and secured by a first lien on substantially all of our assets and the assets of our guarantor subsidiaries, including capital stock of the subsidiaries (in each case, subject to certain exceptions).
The Credit Agreement contains customary negative covenants, including restrictions on our and our restricted subsidiaries’ ability to merge and consolidate with other companies, incur indebtedness, grant liens or security interests on assets, make acquisitions, loans, advances or investments, pay dividends, sell or otherwise transfer assets, optionally prepay or modify terms of any junior indebtedness or enter into transactions with affiliates. Our borrowings under the Credit Facilities are subject to a financial covenant based upon our Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio, with the maximum ratio set at
5.25
for the quarter ending
June 30, 2019
. As of
June 30, 2019
, we were in compliance with all of the foregoing covenants, and our Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio was
4.02
. The Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio requirement for the financial covenant
is scheduled to step-down to
4.75
for the quarters ending September 30, 2019, December 31, 2019 and March 31, 2020;
4.00
for the quarters ending June 30, 2020, September 30, 2020, December 31, 2020 and March 31, 2021; and
3.00
for the quarter ending June 30, 2021 and thereafter. Based on our current covenants and forecasts, we expect to be in compliance for the one-year period after
August 8, 2019
.
The Credit Agreement also includes an Excess Cash Flow Percentage (as such term is defined in the Credit Agreement), which is currently set at
75%
, provided that the Excess Cash Flow Percentage shall be reduced to (1)
50%
, if the Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio is less than
4.00
but greater than or equal to
3.00
, (2)
25%
, if the Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio is less than
3.00
but greater than or equal to
2.50
, and (3)
0%
, if the Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio is less than
2.50
. The excess cash flow payment calculation is determined annually, and for fiscal year 2018, no excess cash flow payment was required.
The following table summarizes the total deferred debt issuance costs for the term loan A facility, the term loan B facility and the revolving facility as of
June 30, 2019
and
September 30, 2018
(dollars in thousands). The remaining deferred debt issuance costs as of
June 30, 2019
will be amortized over their remaining terms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Loan A Facility
|
|
Term Loan B Facility
|
|
Revolving Facility
|
|
Total
|
Deferred debt issuance costs as of September 30, 2018
|
|
$
|
5,842
|
|
|
$
|
2,943
|
|
|
$
|
2,827
|
|
|
$
|
11,612
|
|
Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs
|
|
(2,022
|
)
|
|
(913
|
)
|
|
(979
|
)
|
|
(3,914
|
)
|
Deferred debt issuance costs as of June 30, 2019
|
|
$
|
3,820
|
|
|
$
|
2,030
|
|
|
$
|
1,848
|
|
|
$
|
7,698
|
|
UK Line of Credit
Our subsidiary, Wesco Aircraft EMEA, Ltd., has a
£5.0 million
(
$6.3 million
based on the
June 30, 2019
exchange rate) line of credit that automatically renews annually on November 1 (the UK line of credit). The line of credit bears interest based on the base rate plus an applicable margin of
1.65%
. As of
June 30, 2019
, the full
£5.0 million
was available for borrowing under the UK line of credit without breaching any covenants contained in the agreements governing our indebtedness.
Note 7. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income, which is net of income taxes, consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Net income
|
$
|
14,114
|
|
|
$
|
10,754
|
|
|
$
|
32,417
|
|
|
$
|
25,380
|
|
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)
|
343
|
|
|
(3,015
|
)
|
|
(537
|
)
|
|
(1,731
|
)
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on cash flow hedging instruments
|
(1,919
|
)
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
(5,271
|
)
|
|
2,740
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
$
|
12,538
|
|
|
$
|
7,648
|
|
|
$
|
26,609
|
|
|
$
|
26,389
|
|
Note 8. Net Income Per Share
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share includes the dilutive effect of both outstanding stock options and restricted stock, if any, calculated using the treasury stock method. Assumed proceeds from in-the-money awards are calculated under the “as-if” method as prescribed by ASC 718,
Compensation—Stock Compensation
. The following table provides our basic and diluted net income per share for the three and
nine
months ended
June 30, 2019
and
2018
(dollars in thousands except share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Net income
|
$
|
14,114
|
|
|
$
|
10,754
|
|
|
$
|
32,417
|
|
|
$
|
25,380
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
99,647,188
|
|
|
99,180,632
|
|
|
99,586,122
|
|
|
99,137,710
|
|
Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock
|
558,287
|
|
|
558,585
|
|
|
443,336
|
|
|
258,903
|
|
Dilutive weighted average shares outstanding
|
100,205,475
|
|
|
99,739,217
|
|
|
100,029,458
|
|
|
99,396,613
|
|
Basic net income per share
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
Diluted net income per share
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
For the three months ended
June 30, 2019
and
2018
,
2,498,189
and
2,367,729
shares of common stock equivalents, respectively, were not included in the diluted calculation due to their anti-dilutive effect. For the
nine
months ended
June 30, 2019
and
2018
,
3,122,135
and
2,874,825
shares of common stock equivalents, respectively, were not included in the diluted calculation due to their anti-dilutive effect.
Note 9. Segment Reporting
We are organized based on geographical location. We conduct our business through
three
reportable segments: the Americas, EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) and APAC (Asia Pacific).
We evaluate segment performance based primarily on segment income from operations. Each segment reports its results of operations and makes requests for capital expenditures and working capital needs to our chief operating decision-maker (CODM). Our Chief Executive Officer serves as our CODM.
The following tables present operating and financial information by business segment (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
APAC
|
|
Unallocated Corporate Costs
|
|
Consolidated
|
Net sales
|
$
|
364,098
|
|
|
$
|
63,634
|
|
|
$
|
14,642
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
442,374
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
32,852
|
|
|
(1,948
|
)
|
|
1,492
|
|
|
(9,894
|
)
|
|
22,502
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
(11,518
|
)
|
|
(1,336
|
)
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(12,878
|
)
|
Capital expenditures
|
8,271
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8,485
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
6,160
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
APAC
|
|
Unallocated Corporate Costs
|
|
Consolidated
|
Net sales
|
$
|
333,602
|
|
|
$
|
66,728
|
|
|
$
|
10,029
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
410,359
|
|
Income from operations
|
35,979
|
|
|
4,749
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
(11,732
|
)
|
|
29,328
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
(11,115
|
)
|
|
(1,578
|
)
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(12,717
|
)
|
Capital expenditures
|
997
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
6,417
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2019
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
APAC
|
|
Unallocated Corporate Costs
|
|
Consolidated
|
Net sales
|
$
|
1,032,524
|
|
|
$
|
191,672
|
|
|
$
|
39,963
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,264,159
|
|
Income from operations
|
97,236
|
|
|
2,326
|
|
|
3,722
|
|
|
(28,864
|
)
|
|
74,420
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
(33,918
|
)
|
|
(4,187
|
)
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(38,180
|
)
|
Capital expenditures
|
14,818
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
16,481
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
18,441
|
|
|
2,612
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
21,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2018
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
APAC
|
|
Unallocated Corporate Costs
|
|
Consolidated
|
Net sales
|
$
|
936,367
|
|
|
$
|
199,113
|
|
|
$
|
28,153
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,163,633
|
|
Income from operations
|
96,867
|
|
|
16,731
|
|
|
2,607
|
|
|
(29,109
|
)
|
|
87,096
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
(32,706
|
)
|
|
(3,739
|
)
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(36,520
|
)
|
Capital expenditures
|
3,367
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,009
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
19,076
|
|
|
2,598
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
21,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2019
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
APAC
|
|
Consolidated
|
Total assets
|
$
|
1,498,600
|
|
|
$
|
270,957
|
|
|
$
|
66,626
|
|
|
$
|
1,836,183
|
|
Goodwill
|
204,183
|
|
|
51,190
|
|
|
11,271
|
|
|
266,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2018
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
APAC
|
|
Consolidated
|
Total assets
|
$
|
1,485,453
|
|
|
$
|
248,937
|
|
|
$
|
55,086
|
|
|
$
|
1,789,476
|
|
Goodwill
|
204,183
|
|
|
51,190
|
|
|
11,271
|
|
|
266,644
|
|
Product and Service Information
Net sales by product categories for the three months and
nine
months ended
June 30, 2019
were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
APAC
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Sales
|
|
% of
Total
|
|
Sales
|
|
% of
Total
|
|
Sales
|
|
% of
Total
|
|
Sales
|
|
% of
Total
|
Hardware
|
$
|
168,220
|
|
|
46.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
28,253
|
|
|
44.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,675
|
|
|
38.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
202,148
|
|
|
45.7
|
%
|
Chemicals (1)
|
148,985
|
|
|
40.9
|
%
|
|
31,379
|
|
|
49.3
|
%
|
|
7,668
|
|
|
52.4
|
%
|
|
188,032
|
|
|
42.5
|
%
|
Electronic components
|
31,530
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
2,107
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
310
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
33,947
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
Bearings
|
7,946
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
1,176
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
546
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
9,668
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
Machined parts and other
|
7,417
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
719
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
443
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
8,579
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
Total
|
$
|
364,098
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
63,634
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
14,642
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
442,374
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2019
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
APAC
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Sales
|
|
% of
Total
|
|
Sales
|
|
% of
Total
|
|
Sales
|
|
% of
Total
|
|
Sales
|
|
% of
Total
|
Hardware
|
$
|
484,380
|
|
|
46.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
84,858
|
|
|
44.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
13,768
|
|
|
34.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
583,006
|
|
|
46.1
|
%
|
Chemicals (1)
|
420,890
|
|
|
40.8
|
%
|
|
92,374
|
|
|
48.2
|
%
|
|
21,382
|
|
|
53.5
|
%
|
|
534,646
|
|
|
42.3
|
%
|
Electronic components
|
87,454
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
5,901
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
948
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
94,303
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
Bearings
|
17,275
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
4,189
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
2,730
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
24,194
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
Machined parts and other
|
22,525
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
4,350
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
1,135
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
28,010
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
Total
|
$
|
1,032,524
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
191,672
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
39,963
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,264,159
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
(1) Includes CMS contracts
Note 10. Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
$
|
7,377
|
|
|
$
|
(6,096
|
)
|
|
$
|
(405
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,587
|
)
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
(82.0
|
)%
|
|
36.2
|
%
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
50.2
|
%
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2019, our effective tax rate changed
118.2
percentage points compared to the same period in the prior year and also reflects a movement from tax expense to a tax benefit in the current quarter. The difference in effective tax rates is primarily related to a favorable
$9.2 million
adjustment to the one-time tax imposed on accumulated earnings and profits of foreign operations (the “Transition Tax”) as a result of the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) on December 22, 2017. Without consideration of this discrete adjustment, our effective tax rate would have been
19.0%
for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and
32.8%
for three months ended June 30, 2018. The decrease of our effective tax rate without consideration of discrete adjustments reflects other impacts of the Tax Act, including the reduction of the U.S. federal statutory tax rate, the inclusion of certain foreign earnings under the global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) rules and changes to the foreign tax credit provisions.
For the nine months ended June 30, 2019, our effective tax rate decreased
49.0
percentage points compared to the same period in the prior year. The difference in effective tax rates is primarily related to a favorable
$9.2 million
adjustment to the Transition Tax which occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2019 as well as a provisional
$37.7 million
charge to tax expense related to the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities, a provisional
$37.7 million
tax benefit related to the partial reversal of a deferred tax liability for unremitted foreign earnings and a provisional
$8.8 million
Transition Tax charge,
each of which occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2018 as a result of the Tax Act. An additional
$0.4 million
Transition Tax charge was recorded in subsequent quarters. Without consideration of these discrete adjustments, our effective tax rate would have been
26.4%
for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and
30.3%
for the nine months ended June 30, 2018. The decrease of our effective tax rate without consideration of discrete adjustments reflects other impacts of the Tax Act, including the reduction of the U.S. federal statutory tax rate, the inclusion of certain foreign earnings under the GILTI rules and changes to the foreign tax credit provisions.
The completion of our calculations for the fiscal year 2018 U.S. federal tax return during the three months ended June 30, 2019 resulted in a
$9.2 million
adjustment to the Transition Tax which we had previously recorded. The adjustment results from the utilization of additional foreign tax credits for which we had previously recorded a valuation allowance. Our tax return calculation of the Transition Tax complies with the Tax Act as enacted, which is inconsistent with final regulations issued by the U.S. Treasury Department on June 21, 2019 and proposed regulations which were previously issued on November 28, 2018. Based on the final regulations, we would incur an additional Transition Tax liability of
$7.1 million
but would also utilize, and release the valuation allowance on, an additional
$7.1 million
of foreign tax credits to offset the additional Transition Tax liability, with the result being that no Transition Tax payment would be required. We therefore recorded an uncertain tax position of
$7.1 million
for the potential Transaction Tax liability, reduced our foreign tax credits by
$7.1 million
and released a
$7.1 million
valuation allowance against the foreign tax credits. Taking into consideration the foreign tax credits which we utilized related to both the
$9.2 million
adjustment to the Transition Tax and the additional
$7.1 million
of foreign tax credits which we would utilize to offset the Transition Tax liability under the final regulations, we had a foreign tax credit carryforward of
$10.6 million
as of September 30, 2018.
The Company also recorded a
$0.7 million
tax benefit related to an impairment loss from equity method investment. This tax benefit is not included in the Company’s provision for income taxes but rather is a component of the impairment loss, which is shown separately as equity method investment impairment charge, net of income taxes.
In May 2019 we received a letter from the Canada Revenue Agency for the 2014 fiscal year. The letter addressed the purchase price paid by our Canadian subsidiary to our U.K. subsidiary in September 2014 for the transfer of the Canadian portion of the Interfast business which our U.K. subsidiary had previously acquired in July 2012. The letter does not represent an assessment of tax from the Canada Revenue Agency, nor has any assessment been received as of the date of this filing. Based on limited information received at this time we believe that we have been, and continue to be, in compliance with Canadian tax law. As a result we have not recorded a contingent liability for an uncertain tax position in connection with the letter. If an assessment of tax were to occur, an unfavorable resolution of this matter could have a material effect on our result of operations or cash flows in the period or periods in which an adjustment is recorded or the tax is due or paid. In the event of a Canadian tax assessment, the Company may seek corresponding U.K. tax relief through administrative proceedings in the U.K. but it is uncertain whether any tax relief would be granted.
Note 11. Shareholders' Equity
The following tables provide changes to our shareholders' equity for the three months ended
June 30, 2019
and
2018
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
Total Shareholders'
Equity
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2019
|
99,743,379
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
449,173
|
|
|
$
|
(87,212
|
)
|
|
$
|
349,122
|
|
|
$
|
711,183
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
5,684
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
25
|
|
Settlement on restricted stock tax withholding
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,360
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,360
|
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
14,114
|
|
|
14,114
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,576
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,576
|
)
|
Balance at June 30, 2019
|
99,749,063
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
451,544
|
|
|
$
|
(88,788
|
)
|
|
$
|
363,236
|
|
|
$
|
726,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
Total Shareholders'
Equity
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2018
|
99,490,648
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
440,143
|
|
|
$
|
(80,511
|
)
|
|
$
|
312,361
|
|
|
$
|
672,092
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
3,234
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
31
|
|
Settlement on restricted stock tax withholding
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,598
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,598
|
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10,754
|
|
|
10,754
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3,106
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3,106
|
)
|
Balance at June 30, 2018
|
99,493,882
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
442,745
|
|
|
$
|
(83,617
|
)
|
|
$
|
323,116
|
|
|
$
|
682,343
|
|
The following tables provide changes to our shareholders' equity for the
nine
months ended
June 30, 2019
and
2018
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
Total Shareholders'
Equity
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2018
|
99,557,885
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
444,531
|
|
|
$
|
(82,980
|
)
|
|
$
|
330,819
|
|
|
$
|
692,469
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
191,178
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
38
|
|
Settlement on restricted stock tax withholding
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(442
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(442
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7,418
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7,418
|
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
32,417
|
|
|
32,417
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(5,808
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(5,808
|
)
|
Balance at June 30, 2019
|
99,749,063
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
451,544
|
|
|
$
|
(88,788
|
)
|
|
$
|
363,236
|
|
|
$
|
726,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
Total Shareholders'
Equity
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2017
|
99,450,902
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
436,522
|
|
|
$
|
(84,626
|
)
|
|
$
|
297,736
|
|
|
$
|
649,731
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
42,980
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
63
|
|
Settlement on restricted stock tax withholding
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6,286
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6,286
|
|
Net income
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
25,380
|
|
|
25,380
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2018
|
99,493,882
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
442,745
|
|
|
$
|
(83,617
|
)
|
|
$
|
323,116
|
|
|
$
|
682,343
|
|
Note 12. Commitments and Contingencies
We are involved in various legal matters that arise in the ordinary course of business. Our management, after consulting with outside legal counsel, believes that the ultimate outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows. There can be no assurance, however, that such actions will not be material or adversely affect our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Note 13. Subsequent Event
On August 8, 2019, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) with Wolverine Intermediate Holding II Corporation, a Delaware corporation (Parent), and Wolverine Merger Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (Merger Sub). Parent and Merger Sub are subsidiaries of investment funds advised by Platinum Equity Advisors, LLC, a New-York-based private equity firm. Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined have the meanings set forth in the Merger Agreement.
The Merger Agreement provides, among other things and subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, (i) Merger Sub will be merged with and into the Company, with the Company surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (the Merger), and (ii) at the Effective Time, and as a result of the Merger, each share of common stock, par value
$0.001
per share, of the Company (each a Share and collectively, the Shares), that is issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time, other than shares to be cancelled pursuant to Section 2.1(b) of the Merger Agreement or Dissenting Shares, shall be automatically converted into the right to receive
$11.05
in cash, without interest, subject to any withholding of Taxes required by applicable law as provided in Section 2.5 of the Merger Agreement.
The closing of the Merger is subject to various closing conditions, including (i) adoption of the Merger Agreement by holders of a majority of the Shares then outstanding, (ii) the expiration or early termination of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and receipt of requisite competition and merger controls approvals in the United Kingdom, Germany, Poland and Canada, (iii) the absence of any order of any court of competent jurisdiction or any other Governmental Entity enjoining or prohibiting the consummation of the Merger which continues to be in effect, (iv) authorization of the Transactions by the French Ministry of Economy and Finance pursuant to French foreign investment regulations and (v) subject to Company Material Adverse Effect and other customary materiality qualifications, the accuracy of the representations and warranties contained in the Merger Agreement and compliance with the covenants and agreements contained in the Merger Agreement as of the Closing of the Merger. The closing of the Merger is not subject to a financing condition. Assuming the satisfaction of the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, the Company expects the Merger to close in the fourth calendar quarter of 2019. Upon the closing of the Merger, the Shares will be delisted from the New York Stock Exchange and deregistered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis is intended to help the reader understand our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and capital resources. You should read this discussion in conjunction with our consolidated interim financial statements and the related notes contained elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
The statements in this discussion regarding industry trends, our expectations regarding our future performance, liquidity and capital resources and other non-historical statements are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties described in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2018 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on November 16, 2018 (the 2018 Form 10-K) and "
—
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements." Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statements.
Unless otherwise noted in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the term “Wesco Aircraft” means Wesco Aircraft Holdings, Inc., our top-level holding company, and the terms “Wesco,” “the Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and “our company” mean Wesco Aircraft and its subsidiaries. References to “fiscal year” mean the year ending or ended September 30. For example, “fiscal year
2019
” or “fiscal
2019
” means the period from October 1,
2018
to September 30,
2019
.
Agreement and Plan of Merger
Subsequent to quarter end, on August 8, 2019, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) with Wolverine Intermediate Holding II Corporation, a Delaware corporation (Parent), and Wolverine Merger Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (Merger Sub), pursuant to which Parent will acquire the Company for $11.05 per share through the merger of Merger Sub with and into the Company, with the Company surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (the “Merger”). Parent and Merger Sub are affiliates of Platinum
Equity Advisors, LLC. The closing of the Merger is subject to customary closing conditions, including the approval of the Company’s stockholders and regulatory approvals.
Executive Overview
We are one of the world’s leading distributors and providers of comprehensive supply chain management services to the global aerospace industry, based on annual sales. Our services range from traditional distribution to the management of supplier relationships, quality assurance, kitting, just-in-time (JIT) delivery, chemical management services (CMS), third-party logistics (3PL) or fourth-party logistics (4PL) programs and point-of-use inventory management. We supply over 550,000 active stock-keeping units (SKUs), including C-class hardware, chemicals, electronic components, bearings, tools and machined parts. We serve our customers under both (1) long-term contractual arrangements (Contracts), which include JIT contracts that govern the provision of comprehensive outsourced supply chain management services and long-term agreements (LTAs) that typically set prices for specific products, and (2) ad hoc sales.
Founded in 1953 by the father of our current Chairman of the Board of Directors, we have grown to serve over 7,000 customers, which are primarily in the commercial, military and general aviation sectors, including the leading original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and their subcontractors, through which we support nearly all major Western aircraft programs, and also sell products to airline-affiliated and independent maintenance, repair and overhaul providers. We also service customers in the automotive, energy, health care, industrial, pharmaceutical and space sectors.
Industry Trends Affecting Our Business
We rely on demand for new commercial and military aircraft for a significant portion of our sales. Commercial aircraft demand is driven by many factors, including the global economy, industry passenger volumes and capacity utilization, airline profitability, introduction of new models and the lifecycle of current fleets. Demand for business jets is closely correlated to regional economic conditions and corporate profits, but also influenced by new models and changes in ownership dynamics. Military aircraft demand is primarily driven by government spending, the timing of orders and evolving U.S. Department of Defense strategies and policies.
Aftermarket demand is affected by many of the same trends as those in OEM channels, as well as requirements to maintain aging aircraft and the cost of fuel, which can lead to greater utilization of existing planes. Demand in the military aftermarket is further driven by changes in overall fleet size and the level of U.S. military operational activity domestically and overseas.
Supply chain service providers and distributors have been aided by these trends along with an increase in outsourcing activities, as OEMs and their suppliers focus on reducing their capital commitments and operating costs.
Commercial Aerospace Market
Over the past three years, major airlines have ordered new aircraft at a robust pace, aided by strong profits and increasing passenger volumes. At the same time, volatile fuel prices have led to greater demand for fuel-efficient models and new engine options for existing aircraft designs. The rise of emerging markets has added to the growth in overall demand at a
stronger pace than seen historically. Large commercial OEMs have indicated that they expect a high level of deliveries with the exception of the Boeing Company's 737 MAX aircraft impact, primarily due to continued demand and their unprecedented level of backlogs.
The recent pause in deliveries and reduced production rate of the 737 MAX aircraft by the Boeing company could negatively affect total large commercial aircraft deliveries. The impact is dependent upon when the aircraft returns to service, which will be determined by factors such as certification by the FAA and other regulatory authorities, when the OEM resumes deliveries and returns to its previous production schedule and whether or not the delay creates disruptions to the related supply chain.
Business aviation has lagged the larger commercial market, reflecting a deeper downturn in the last recession, changes in corporate spending patterns and an uncertain economic outlook. While overall business aviation production levels remain below their pre-recession peak, recent indicators point to improved market conditions. Production has increased for new models, and the number of pre-owned aircraft relative to the total business aviation in-service fleet has fallen to multi-year lows. Whether these improved conditions lead to increased deliveries in the future remains uncertain.
Military Aerospace Market
Military production has fluctuated for many aircraft programs in the past few years. Increases in the U.S. Department of Defense budget for fiscal years 2018 and 2019 have supported greater production of certain military programs. In particular, we believe the services we provide the Joint Strike Fighter program will benefit our business as production for that program increases. We believe increased sales from other established programs that directly benefit from these changes also will benefit our business.
U.S. Department of Defense spending continues to be uncertain for fiscal years 2020 through 2023, given that the limits imposed upon U.S. government discretionary spending by the Budget Control Act and the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 remain in effect for these fiscal years, unless Congress acts to raise the spending limits or repeal or suspend the provisions of these laws. Future budget cuts or changes in spending priorities could result in existing program delays, changes or cancellations.
Goodwill
For the EMEA reporting unit, our most recent Step 1 goodwill impairment test occurred on July 1, 2018, which reflected fair value in excess of carrying value of 32.4%. For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2019, EMEA has underperformed relative to the forecasts included in the July 1, 2018 Step 1 analysis. On June 30, 2019, we evaluated whether there were any events or changes in circumstances that would indicate that it was more likely than not that the EMEA reporting unit's carrying value was less than its fair value. Our evaluation considered macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance, Wesco entity specific operating results and other relevant Wesco entity specific events. Our evaluation did not indicate it was more likely than not that the carrying value of the EMEA reporting unit exceeded its fair value. We consider our current forecasts to be reasonable and achievable based upon our historical performance and management’s actions currently being executed; and have concluded, as a result, that no interim triggering event has occurred. We will perform our next annual goodwill impairment test on July 1, 2019.
Equity Method Investment
We apply the equity method of accounting for investments in which we have significant influence but not a controlling interest. Our APAC reporting unit has an equity investment in a joint venture in China, the carrying value of which was $7.4 million and $10.4 million as of June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively, and was included in “Other assets” in the unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the three months ended June 30, 2019, we recorded an impairment charge of $3.0 million ($2.3 million net of income taxes) resulting from a decline in value below the carrying amount of our equity method investment, which we determined was other than temporary in nature.
Other Factors Affecting Our Financial Results
Fluctuations in Revenue
There are many factors, such as changes in customer aircraft build rates, customer plant shut downs, variation in customer working days, changes in selling prices, the amount of new customers’ consigned or owned inventory and increases or decreases in customer inventory levels, that can cause fluctuations in our financial results from quarter to quarter. Ad hoc business also can be further influenced by the amount of supply chain disruption in the market due to changes in aircraft build rates, new aircraft introduction, customer or site consolidations, and other factors. While we try to mitigate the degree of fluctuations in our ad hoc business through establishing longer-term contractual relationships with our customers, such variability still will occur. We consider both shorter-term fluctuations and longer-term trends in the operation of our business which can affect quarterly trends of financial results at any given time.
We will continue our strategy of seeking to expand our relationships with existing ad hoc customers by transitioning them to Contracts, as well as expanding relationships with our existing Contract customers to include additional customer sites, additional SKUs and additional levels of service. New Contract customers and expansion of existing Contract customers to additional sites and SKUs sometimes leads to a corresponding decrease in ad hoc sales as a portion of the SKUs sold under Contracts were previously sold to the same customer as ad hoc sales. We believe this strategy serves to mitigate some of the fluctuations in our net sales. Our sales to Contract customers may fail to meet our expectations for a variety of reasons, in particular if industry build rates are lower than expected or, for certain newer JIT customers, if their consigned or owned inventory, which must be exhausted before corresponding products are purchased directly from us, is greater than we expected.
If any of our customers are acquired or controlled by a company that elects not to utilize our services, or attempts to implement in-sourcing initiatives, it could have a negative effect on our strategy to mitigate fluctuations in our net sales. Additionally, although we derive a significant portion of our net sales from the building of new commercial and military aircraft, we have not typically experienced extreme fluctuations in our net sales when sales for an individual aircraft program decrease, which we believe is attributable to our diverse base of customers and programs.
Fluctuations in Margins
Our gross margins are primarily impacted by changes in the product mix of our sales, the price of our products and the cost of our inventory. Generally, our hardware products have higher gross profit margins than chemicals and electronic components and ad hoc hardware products have a higher margin than Contract hardware products.
We also believe that our strategy of growing our Contract sales and converting ad hoc customers into Contract customers could negatively affect our gross profit margins, as gross profit margins tend to be higher on ad hoc sales than they are on portions of Contract-related sales. However, we believe any potential adverse impact on our gross profit margins would be outweighed by the benefits of a more stable long-term revenue stream attributable to Contract customers as well as potential market share growth and higher revenues and gross profit supported by more aggressive product pricing to compete.
Our Contracts generally provide for fixed prices, which can expose us to risks if the prices we pay to our suppliers rise due to increased raw material or other costs. However, we believe our expansive product offerings and inventories, our ad hoc sales and, where possible, our longer-term agreements with suppliers have enabled us to mitigate this risk. Some of our Contracts are denominated in foreign currencies and fixed prices in these Contracts can expose us to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates with the U.S. dollar.
Fluctuations in Cash Flow
Our cash flows are principally affected by fluctuations in our inventory. When we are awarded new programs, we generally increase our inventory to prepare for expected sales related to the new programs, which often take time to materialize, and to achieve minimum stock requirements, if any. As a result, if certain programs for which we have procured inventory are delayed or if certain newer JIT customers’ consigned inventory is larger than we expected, we may experience a more sustained inventory increase.
Inventory fluctuations may also be attributable to general industry trends. Factors that may contribute to fluctuations in inventory levels in the future could include (1) purchases to take advantage of favorable pricing; (2) purchases to acquire high-volume products that are typically difficult to obtain in sufficient quantities; (3) changes in supplier lead times and the timing of inventory deliveries; (4) purchases made in anticipation of future growth; and (5) purchases made in connection with new customer Contracts or the expansion of existing Contracts. Customer liability provisions in many of our Contracts also may serve to mitigate our risk to related inventory remaining at the time a Contract expires or is terminated. Because effective inventory management is a key competitive skill, we continuously work to improve our procurement planning and management practices to mitigate the negative impact of inventory buildups on our cash flow.
Our accounts receivable balance as a percentage of net sales may fluctuate from quarter to quarter. These fluctuations are primarily driven by changes, from quarter to quarter, in the timing and magnitude of sales within the quarter and variation in the time required to collect the payments. The completion of customer Contracts with accelerated payment terms can also contribute to these quarter-to-quarter fluctuations. Similarly, our accounts payable may fluctuate from quarter to quarter, which is primarily driven by the timing required to make payments and the volume of purchases or payments made to our suppliers.
Segment Presentation
We conduct our business through three reportable segments: the Americas, EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa), and APAC (Asia Pacific). We evaluate segment performance based primarily on segment income or loss from operations. Each segment reports its results of operations and makes requests for capital expenditures and working capital needs to our chief operating decision maker (CODM). Our Chief Executive Officer serves as our CODM.
Key Components of Our Results of Operations
The following is a discussion of the key line items included in our financial statements for the periods presented below under the heading “Results of Operations.” These are the measures that management utilizes to assess our results of operations, anticipate future trends and evaluate risks in our business.
Net Sales
Our net sales include sales of hardware, chemicals, electronic components, bearings, tools and machined parts, and eliminate all intercompany sales. We also provide certain services to our customers, including quality assurance, kitting, JIT delivery, CMS, 3PL or 4PL programs and point-of-use inventory management.
Services under our hardware JIT arrangements are provided by us contemporaneously with the delivery of these products, and as such, once the products are delivered, we do not have a post-delivery obligation to provide services to the customer. Accordingly, the price of such services is generally included in the price of the products delivered to the customer, and revenue is recognized upon delivery of the products.
Our CMS contracts also include the sale of chemical products as well as services. The CMS contracts represent an end-to-end integrated chemical management solution. While each of the products and various services benefits the customer, we determined that they are a single output in the context of a CMS contract and revenue is recognized over time using product deliveries as our output measure of progress under the CMS contract.
We serve our customers under Contracts, which include JIT contracts and LTAs, and with ad hoc sales. Under JIT contracts, customers typically commit to purchase specified products from us at a fixed price, on an as-needed basis, and we are responsible for maintaining stock availability of those products. LTAs are typically negotiated price lists for customers or individual customer sites that cover a range of pre-determined products, purchased on an as-needed basis. Ad hoc purchases are made by customers on an as-needed basis and are generally supplied out of our existing inventory. Contract customers often purchase products that are not captured under their Contract on an ad hoc basis.
Income from Operations
Income from operations is the result of subtracting the cost of sales and selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses from net sales and is one of several key measures to evaluate our performance and profitability.
The principal component of our cost of sales is product cost, which was 94.2% and 94.4% of our total cost of sales for the three months ended
June 30, 2019
and
2018
, respectively, and 94.4% of our total cost of sales for both the
nine
months ended
June 30, 2019
and
2018
. The remaining components are freight and expediting fees, import duties, tooling repair charges, packaging supplies, excess and obsolete (E&O) inventory and inventory valuation adjustments.
Product cost is determined by the current weighted average cost of each inventory item, except for chemical parts for which the first-in, first-out method is used, and the provision, if any, for E&O inventory. The inventory provision is calculated to write-down the value of excess and obsolete inventory to its net realizable value. We review inventory for excess quantities and obsolescence quarterly. For a description of our E&O provision policy, see Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Inventories” in the 2018 Form 10-K. During the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, net adjustments to cost of sales related to E&O inventory related activities were $(4.1) million and $6.2 million, respectively. The net adjustments for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 reflect a combination of additional expense for E&O related provisions ($2.4 million and $12.9 million, respectively) offset by sales and disposals ($6.5 million and $6.7 million, respectively) of inventory for which an E&O provision was provided previously through expense recognized in prior periods. During the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, net adjustments to cost of sales related to E&O inventory related activities were $(1.6) million and $11.0 million, respectively. The net adjustments for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 reflect a combination of additional expense for E&O related provisions ($17.0 million and $28.1 million, respectively) offset by sales and disposals ($18.6 million and $17.1 million, respectively) of inventory for which an E&O provision was provided previously through expense recognized in prior periods. We believe that these amounts appropriately write-down E&O inventory to its net realizable value.
The principal components of our SG&A expenses are salaries, wages, benefits and bonuses paid to our employees; stock-based compensation; commissions paid to outside sales representatives; travel and other business expenses; training and recruitment costs; marketing, advertising and promotional event costs; rent; bad debt expense; fees for professional services (including consulting, legal, audit and tax); and other ordinary day-to-day business expenses. Depreciation and amortization expense is also included in SG&A expenses, and consists primarily of scheduled depreciation for leasehold improvements, machinery and equipment, vehicles, computers, software and furniture and fixtures. Depreciation and amortization also includes intangible asset amortization expense.
Other Expenses
Interest Expense, Net.
Interest expense, net consists of the interest we pay on our long-term debt, interest and fees on our revolving facility (as defined below under “
—
Liquidity and Capital Resources
—
Credit Facilities”) and our line-of-credit and deferred debt issuance costs, net of interest income.
Other (Expense) Income, Net.
Other (expense) income, net is primarily comprised of foreign exchange gain or loss associated with transactions denominated in currencies other than the respective functional currency of the reporting subsidiary.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The methods, estimates, and judgments we use in applying our most critical accounting policies have a significant impact on the results we report in our financial statements. We evaluate our estimates and judgments on an on-going basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Our experience and assumptions form the basis for our judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may vary from what we anticipate, and different assumptions or estimates about the future could change our reported results. For a description of our critical accounting policies and estimates, see Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in the 2018 Form 10-K.
Effective October 1, 2018, we adopted the amended ASU 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
(ASC 606). The following describes our new accounting policy related to our recognition of revenue from contracts with customers pursuant to ASC 606.
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Pursuant to Accounting Standard Codification Topic 606,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(ASC 606)
,
we
recognize revenue when our customer obtains control of promised goods or services, in an amount that reflects the consideration that we expect to receive in exchange for those goods or services. To determine revenue recognition for arrangements that we determine are within the scope of ASC 606, we perform the following five steps: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. We recognize revenue in the amount of the transaction price that is allocated to the respective performance obligation when (or as) the performance obligation is satisfied.
Typically, our master purchase contracts with our customer run for three to five years without minimum purchase requirements annually or over the term of the contract and contain termination for convenience provisions, which generally allow for our customers to terminate their contracts on short notice without meaningful penalties. Pursuant to ASC 606, we have concluded that for revenue recognition purposes, our customers’ purchase orders (P.O.'s) are considered contracts, which are supplemented by certain contract terms such as service fee arrangements and variable price considerations in our master purchase contracts. The P.O.'s are typically fulfilled within one year.
Our contracts for hardware and chemical product sales have a single performance obligation. Revenues from these contract sales are recognized when the customer obtains control of our products, which occurs at a point in time, typically upon delivery in accordance with the terms of the sales contract. Services under our hardware JIT arrangements are provided
by us contemporaneously with the delivery of these products and are not separately identifiable from the products, and as such, once the products are delivered, we do not have a post-delivery obligation to provide services to the customer. Accordingly, the price of such services is generally included in the price of the products delivered to the customer, and revenue is recognized upon delivery of the products. Payment is generally due within 30 to 90 days of delivery; therefore, our contracts do not create significant financing components. Warranties are limited to replacement of goods that are defective upon delivery; and the Company does not give service-type warranties.
Our CMS contracts include the sale of chemical products as well as services such as product procurement, receiving and quality inspection, warehouse and inventory management, and waste disposal. The CMS contracts represent an end-to-end integrated chemical management solution. While each of the products and various services benefits the customer, we determined that they are a single output in the context of the CMS contract due to the significant integration of these products and services. Therefore, chemical products and services provided under a CMS contract represent a single performance obligation and revenue is recognized for these contracts over time using product deliveries as our output measure of progress under the CMS contract to depict the transfer of control to the customer.
We report revenue on a gross or net basis in our presentation of net sales and costs of sales based on management’s assessment of whether we act as a principal or agent in the transaction. If we are the principal in the transaction and have control of the specified good or service before that good or service is transferred to a customer, the transactions are recorded as gross in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. If we do not act as a principal in the transaction, the transactions are recorded on a net basis in the consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive income. This assessment requires significant judgment to evaluate indicators of control within our contracts. We base our judgment on various indicators that include whether we take possession of the products, whether we are responsible for their acceptability, whether we have inventory risk, and whether we have discretion in establishing the price paid by the customer. The majority of our revenue is recorded on a gross basis with the exception of certain gas, energy and chemical management service contracts that are recorded on a net basis.
With respect to variable consideration,
we apply judgment in estimating its impact to determine the amount of revenue to recognize.
Sales rebates and profit-sharing arrangements are accounted for as a reduction to gross sales and recorded based upon estimates at the time products are sold. These estimates are based upon historical experience for similar programs and products. We review such rebates and profit-sharing arrangements on an ongoing basis and accruals are adjusted, if necessary, as additional information becomes available. We provide allowances for credits and returns based on historic experience and adjust such allowances as considered necessary. To date such provisions have been within the range of our expectations and the allowances established.
Returns and refunds are allowed only for materials that are defective or not compliant with the customer’s order.
Sales tax collected from customers is excluded from net sales in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
We have determined that sales backlog is not a relevant measure of our business. Few, if any, of our contracts include minimum purchase requirements, annually or over the term of the agreement. As a result, we have no material sales backlog.
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
|
Consolidated Results of Operations
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
442,374
|
|
|
$
|
410,359
|
|
|
$
|
1,264,159
|
|
|
$
|
1,163,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
105,870
|
|
|
$
|
104,197
|
|
|
$
|
312,959
|
|
|
$
|
304,356
|
|
Selling, general & administrative expenses
|
|
83,368
|
|
|
74,869
|
|
|
238,539
|
|
|
217,260
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
22,502
|
|
|
29,328
|
|
|
74,420
|
|
|
87,096
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
(12,878
|
)
|
|
(12,717
|
)
|
|
(38,180
|
)
|
|
(36,520
|
)
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
(630
|
)
|
|
239
|
|
|
(1,161
|
)
|
|
391
|
|
Income before income taxes and equity method investment impairment charge
|
|
8,994
|
|
|
16,850
|
|
|
35,079
|
|
|
50,967
|
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
7,377
|
|
|
(6,096
|
)
|
|
(405
|
)
|
|
(25,587
|
)
|
Income before equity method investment impairment charge
|
|
16,371
|
|
|
10,754
|
|
|
34,674
|
|
|
25,380
|
|
Equity method investment impairment charge, net of income taxes
|
|
(2,257
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2,257
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
14,114
|
|
|
$
|
10,754
|
|
|
$
|
32,417
|
|
|
$
|
25,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(as a percentage of net sales,
numbers rounded)
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
23.9
|
%
|
|
25.4
|
%
|
|
24.8
|
%
|
|
26.2
|
%
|
Selling, general & administrative expenses
|
|
18.8
|
%
|
|
18.3
|
%
|
|
18.9
|
%
|
|
18.7
|
%
|
Income from operations
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
(2.9
|
)%
|
|
(3.1
|
)%
|
|
(3.0
|
)%
|
|
(3.1
|
)%
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
—
|
%
|
Income before income taxes and equity method investment impairment charge
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
(2.2
|
)%
|
Income before equity method investment impairment charge
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
Equity method investment impairment charge, net of income taxes
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
—
|
%
|
Net income
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
compared with
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
Net Sales
Consolidated net sales
increase
d
$32.0 million
, or
7.8%
to
$442.4 million
for the
three months ended June 30,
2019
compared to
$410.4 million
for the same period in the prior year. The
$32.0 million
or
7.8%
increase
reflects primarily 10.8% higher sales in total for Contract hardware products and chemical products, partially offset by a 1.1%
decline in ad hoc hardware sales compared with the same period in the prior year. Net sales benefited from continued market growth, and reflects the company’s strong position with major customers. In addition, approximately one-third of the
$32.0 million
net sales increase in the current year represents higher revenue from sales related to contract liability claims compared with the same period in the prior year. Ad hoc hardware sales and Contract sales as a percentage of net sales represented 22% and 78%, respectively, for the
three months ended June 30,
2019
, as compared to 24% and 76% respectively, for the same period in the prior year.
Income from Operations
Consolidated income from operations
decline
d
$6.8 million
to
$22.5 million
for the
three months ended June 30,
2019
compared to
$29.3 million
for the same period in the prior year. The
$6.8 million
decline
in income from operations was due to an
$8.5 million
increase
in SG&A expenses, partially offset by higher gross profit of
$1.7 million
. Income from operations as a percentage of net sales
decline
d
2.0
percentage points compared with the same period in the prior year.
The higher gross profit was driven by increases in sales volume compared with the same period in the prior year, partially offset by a decline in gross margin. Gross margins declined 1.5 percentage points overall, primarily reflecting weaker margins in the EMEA segment resulting from more aggressive pricing for hardware products, including for certain Contract renewals, and lower chemical margins due to increased pass-through sales, as well as the impact on revenues of weaker British Pound and Euro exchange rates versus the U.S. dollar for local currency denominated business. The gross margin decline also reflects the effect of lower margins in the Americas segment reflecting several factors: for Contract hardware sales, margins on end of contract related sales were significantly higher in the prior year period; for ad hoc sales of hardware products, lower current year margins reflect more aggressive pricing to gain sales volume; a shift in product mix towards lower margin chemical and certain contracted hardware sales. The overall gross profit was also higher as a result of lower net write-downs to net realizable value for excess and obsolete inventory and other inventory adjustments for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared with the same period in the prior year.
SG&A expenses
increase
d
$8.5 million
, primarily reflecting increases in personnel related costs of $5.8 million, warehouse related costs of $2.1 million and professional services costs of $0.7 million largely related to the Wesco 2020 project and business growth. While higher personnel related costs primarily reflect investment to execute Wesco 2020 initiatives, the majority of these cost increases are the result of execution steps that are expected to have a defined end point. Key examples include duplicative staffing costs required during transition and consolidation of single product warehouses into multi-product service centers, severance expense and project performance incentives. The Wesco 2020 related costs, including professional fees for consulting support, totaled $10.6 million for the
three months ended June 30,
2019
, compared with $7.5 million for the same period in the prior year. The company estimates that the 2020 initiatives have captured approximately $2.9 million of savings for the quarter, excluding temporary and one-time costs, which more than offset higher personnel related costs supporting revenue growth and related activities. SG&A as a percent of net sales increased
0.5
percentage points compared with the same period in the prior year, including the increased staffing, severance, performance incentives, and site related costs related to Wesco 2020 initiatives.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net was
$12.9 million
for the
three months ended June 30,
2019
compared to
$12.7 million
for the same period in the prior year. The increase was primarily due to an increase in interest rates, partially offset by a decreased average borrowing amount compared with the same period in the prior year.
Benefit (Provision) for Income Taxes
The income tax benefit for the
three months ended June 30,
2019
was
$7.4 million
, compared to an income tax provision of
$6.1 million
for the same period in the prior year. As a result, for the three months ended June 30, 2019, our effective tax rate changed 118.2 percentage points compared to the same period in the prior year. The difference in effective tax rates is primarily related to a favorable $9.2 million adjustment to the one-time tax imposed on accumulated earnings and profits of foreign operations (the “Transition Tax”) as a result of the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) on December 22, 2017. Without consideration of this discrete adjustment, our effective tax rate would have been 19.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 32.8% for three months ended June 30, 2018. The decrease of our effective tax rate without consideration of discrete adjustments reflects other impacts of the Tax Act, including the reduction of the U.S. federal statutory tax rate, the inclusion of certain foreign earnings under the global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) rules and changes to the foreign tax credit provisions.
Equity Method Investment Impairment Charge, net of Income Taxes
Our APAC segment has an investment in a joint venture in China for which we apply the equity method of accounting. During the
three months ended June 30,
2019
, we recorded a $3.0 million impairment resulting from a decline in the carrying value of this investment, which was determined to be other than temporary in nature. This impairment charge was partially
offset by $0.7 million of the related income tax benefit. See further discussion of this impairment under “
—Equity Method Investment
” section above.
Net Income
Net income for the
three months ended June 30,
2019
was
$14.1 million
, compared to net income of
$10.8 million
for the same period in the prior year. The decline in income from operations and equity method investment impairment charge were more than offset by the favorable change in income tax.
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2019
compared with
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2018
Net Sales
Consolidated net sales
increase
d
$100.5 million
, or
8.6%
to
$1,264.2 million
for the
nine months ended June 30, 2019
compared to
$1,163.6 million
for the same period in the prior year. The
$100.5 million
increase reflects higher sales across all major product categories including chemicals, Contract hardware and ad hoc hardware. The net sales increase benefited from continued market growth, and reflects the company’s strong position with major customers. Ad hoc hardware sales and Contract sales as a percentage of net sales represented 24% and 76%, respectively, for both the
nine months ended June 30,
2019
and 2018.
Income from Operations
Consolidated income from operations
decline
d
$12.7 million
to
$74.4 million
for the
nine months ended June 30,
2019
compared to
$87.1 million
for the same period in the prior year. The
$12.7 million
decline
in income from operations was due to an increase in SG&A expenses of
$21.3 million
, partially offset by higher gross profit of
$8.6 million
. Income from operations as a percentage of net sales
decline
d
1.6
percentage points compared with the same period in the prior year.
The higher gross profit was driven by increases in sales volume compared with the same period in the prior year, partially offset by a decline in gross margin. Gross margins declined
1.4
percentage points, primarily reflecting weaker margins in the EMEA segment resulting from more aggressive pricing for hardware products, including for certain Contract renewals, and lower chemical margins due to increased pass-through sales, as well as the impact on revenues of weaker British Pound and Euro exchange rates versus the U.S. dollar for local currency denominated business. The gross margin decline also reflects the effect of lower margins in the Americas segment reflecting several factors: for Contract hardware sales, margins on end of contract related sales were significantly higher in the prior year period; for ad hoc sales of hardware products, lower current year margins reflect more aggressive pricing to gain sales volume; and a shift in product mix towards lower margin chemical and certain contracted hardware sales. The overall gross profit was also higher as a result of lower net write-downs to net realizable value for excess and obsolete inventory and other inventory adjustments for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 compared with the same period in the prior year.
The
$21.3 million
increase in SG&A expenses largely reflects increases in payroll and other personnel related costs of $15.1 million, building and equipment costs of $2.8 million and professional fees of $2.1 million. While higher personnel related costs primarily reflect investment to execute Wesco 2020 initiatives, the majority of these cost increases are the result of execution steps that have a defined end point. Key examples include duplicative staffing costs required during transition and consolidation of single product warehouses into multi-product service centers, severance expense and project performance incentives. The Wesco 2020 related costs, including professional fees for consulting support, totaled $28.3 million for the
nine months ended June 30,
2019
, compared with $13.3 million for the same period in the prior year. The company estimates that the 2020 initiatives have captured approximately $8.2 million of savings for the nine months of this year, excluding temporary and one-time costs, which more than offset higher personnel related costs supporting revenue growth and related activities. SG&A as a percent of net sales increased
0.2
percentage points compared with the same period in the prior year, including the increase in expense in the current year due to increased staffing, severance, performance incentives, and site related costs required for the execution of Wesco 2020 initiatives.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net was
$38.2 million
for the
nine months ended June 30,
2019
compared to
$36.5 million
for the same period in the prior year. The increase was primarily due to an increase in interest rates, partially offset by a decreased average borrowing amount compared with the same period in the prior year.
Provision for Income Taxes
The income tax provision for the
nine months ended June 30,
2019
was
$0.4 million
, compared to
$25.6 million
for the same period in the prior year. For the nine months ended June 30, 2019, our effective tax rate decreased 49.0 percentage points compared to the same period in the prior year. The difference in effective tax rates is primarily related to a favorable $9.2 million adjustment to the Transition Tax which occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2019 as well as a provisional $37.7 million charge to tax expense related to the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities, a provisional $37.7 million tax benefit related to the partial reversal of a deferred tax liability for unremitted foreign earnings and a provisional $8.8 million Transition Tax charge, each of which occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2018 as a result of the Tax Act. An additional $0.4 million Transition Tax charge was recorded in subsequent quarters. Without consideration of these discrete adjustments, our effective tax rate would have been 26.4% for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 30.3% for the nine months ended June 30, 2018. The decrease of our effective tax rate without consideration of discrete adjustments reflects other impacts of the Tax Act, including the reduction of the U.S. federal statutory tax rate, the inclusion of certain foreign earnings under the GILTI rules and changes to the foreign tax credit provisions.
Equity Method Investment Impairment Charge, net of Income Taxes
Our APAC segment has an investment in a joint venture in China for which we apply the equity method of accounting. During the
three months ended June 30,
2019
, we recorded a $3.0 million impairment resulting from a decline in the carrying value of this investment, which was determined to be other than temporary in nature. This impairment charge was partially
offset by $0.7 million of related income tax benefit. See further discussion of this impairment under “
—Equity Method Investment
” section above.
Net Income
Net income for the
nine months ended June 30,
2019
was
$32.4 million
, compared to a net income of
$25.4 million
for the same period in the prior year. The decline in income from operations and equity method investment impairment charge were more than offset by the favorable change in income tax.
Americas Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
Americas Results of Operations
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
364,098
|
|
|
$
|
333,602
|
|
|
$
|
1,032,524
|
|
|
$
|
936,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
92,092
|
|
|
$
|
85,532
|
|
|
$
|
265,034
|
|
|
$
|
244,863
|
|
Selling, general & administrative expenses
|
|
59,240
|
|
|
49,553
|
|
|
167,798
|
|
|
147,996
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$
|
32,852
|
|
|
$
|
35,979
|
|
|
$
|
97,236
|
|
|
$
|
96,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(as a percentage of net sales,
numbers rounded)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
25.3
|
%
|
|
25.6
|
%
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
|
26.2
|
%
|
Selling, general & administrative expenses
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
14.8
|
%
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
15.9
|
%
|
Income from operations
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
compared with
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
Net Sales
Net sales for our Americas segment
increase
d $
30.5 million
, or
9.1%
, to $
364.1 million
for the
three months ended June 30, 2019
, compared to
$333.6 million
for the same period in the prior year. The
$30.5 million
increase
in net sales for the
three months ended June 30, 2019
reflects growth in chemicals and Contract hardware sales with ad hoc hardware sales relatively flat. In addition, approximately one-third of the $30.5 million net sales increase in the current year represents higher revenue from sales related to contract liability claims compared with the same period in the prior year.
Income from Operations
Income from operations
decline
d
$3.1 million
to
$32.9 million
for the
three months ended June 30, 2019
, compared to
$36.0 million
for the same period in the prior year. The
$3.1 million
decline
in income from operations resulted from an increase in SG&A expenses of
$9.7 million
, which was offset partially by higher gross profit of
$6.6 million
. Income from operations as a percentage of net sales
decrease
d
1.8
percentage points, compared with the same period in the prior year.
The
$6.6 million
increase in gross profit reflects the result of sales increases, partially offset by a decline in gross margin. A gross margin
decline
of
0.3
percentage points reflects lower margins on ad hoc hardware and Contract sales largely related to more aggressive pricing in hardware as well as a change in overall product mix. The overall gross profit was also higher as a result of lower net write-downs to net realizable value for excess and obsolete inventory and other inventory adjustments for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared with the same period in the prior year.
The
$9.7 million
increase
in SG&A expenses primarily reflects increases in payroll and other personnel related costs of $7.4 million, warehouse-related costs of $1.5 million and professional fees of $0.8 million. While higher personnel related costs primarily reflect investment to execute Wesco 2020 initiatives, the majority of these cost increases are the result of execution steps that have a defined end point. Key examples include duplicative staffing costs required during transition and consolidation of single product warehouses into multi-product service centers, severance expense and project performance incentives. The Wesco 2020 related costs totaled $4.7 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2019
. The company estimates that the 2020 initiatives have captured approximately $2.3 million of savings for the quarter, excluding temporary and one-time costs, which more than offset higher personnel related costs supporting revenue growth and related activities. SG&A as a percent of net sales increased
1.4
percentage points, including the increase in expense that was due to increased staffing, severance, performance incentives, and site related costs required for the execution of Wesco 2020 initiatives.
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2019
compared with
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2018
Net Sales
Net sales for our Americas segment
increase
d $96.1 million, or
10.3%
, to $
1,032.5 million
for the
nine months ended June 30, 2019
, compared to
$936.4 million
for the same period in the prior year. The $96.1 million
increase
in net sales for the
nine months ended June 30, 2019
reflects growth across all product groups including chemicals, ad hoc hardware and Contract hardware sales.
Income from Operations
Income from operations
increase
d $0.3 million to
$97.2 million
for the
nine months ended June 30, 2019
, compared to income from operations of
$96.9 million
for the same period in the prior year. The $0.3 million
increase
in income from operations resulted from higher gross profit of $20.1 million, offset by an increase in SG&A expenses of
$19.8 million
. Income from operations as a percentage of net sales
decrease
d
0.9
percentage points, compared with the same period in the prior year.
The $20.1 million increase in gross profit reflects the result of sales increases, partially offset by a decline in gross margin. A gross margin
decline
of
0.5
percentage points reflects lower margins on ad hoc hardware and Contract sales largely related to more aggressive pricing in hardware as well as a change in overall product mix. The overall gross profit was also higher as a result of lower net write-downs to net realizable value for excess and obsolete inventory and other inventory adjustments for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 compared with the same period in the prior year.
The
$19.8 million
increase in SG&A expenses primarily reflects increases in payroll and other personnel related costs of $16.6 million, professional fees of $1.2 million and information technology related costs of $0.9 million related to the investment in infrastructure and overall IT capabilities. While higher personnel related costs primarily reflect investment to
execute Wesco 2020 initiatives, the majority of these cost increases are the result of execution steps that have a defined end point. Key examples include duplicative staffing costs required during transition and consolidation of single product warehouses into multi-product service centers, severance expense and project performance incentives. The Wesco 2020 related costs totaled $12.6 million for the
nine months ended June 30, 2019
. The company estimates that the 2020 initiatives have captured approximately $6.6 million of savings for the year to date, excluding temporary and one-time costs, which more than offset higher personnel related costs supporting revenue growth and related activities. SG&A as a percent of net sales increased
0.4
percentage point, including the increase in expense that was due to increased staffing, severance, performance incentives, and site related costs required for the execution of Wesco 2020 initiatives.
EMEA Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
EMEA Results of Operations
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
63,634
|
|
|
$
|
66,728
|
|
|
$
|
191,672
|
|
|
$
|
199,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
11,065
|
|
|
$
|
16,571
|
|
|
$
|
38,871
|
|
|
$
|
52,354
|
|
Selling, general & administrative expenses
|
|
13,013
|
|
|
11,822
|
|
|
36,545
|
|
|
35,623
|
|
(Loss) income from operations
|
|
$
|
(1,948
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,749
|
|
|
$
|
2,326
|
|
|
$
|
16,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(as a percentage of net sales,
numbers rounded)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
17.4
|
%
|
|
24.8
|
%
|
|
20.3
|
%
|
|
26.3
|
%
|
Selling, general & administrative expenses
|
|
20.5
|
%
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
|
19.1
|
%
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
(Loss) income from operations
|
|
(3.1
|
)%
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
compared with
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
Net Sales
Net sales for our EMEA segment
decline
d
$3.1 million
, or
4.6%
, to
$63.6 million
for the
three months ended June 30, 2019
, compared to
$66.7 million
for the same period in the prior year. The lower net sales for the
three months ended June 30, 2019
, reflects primarily a decline in ad hoc hardware sales, and to a lesser degree, chemical product sales, partially offset by higher hardware Contract sales compared with the same period in the prior year.
(Loss) income from Operations
Income from operations
decline
d
$6.7 million
, or
141.0%
, to a loss from operations of
$1.9 million
for the
three months ended June 30, 2019
, compared to income from operations of
$4.7 million
for the same period in the prior year. The
$6.7 million
decline
in income from operations was comprised primarily of a
decline
in gross profit of
$5.5 million
as well as an increase in SG&A expenses of $1.2 million. Loss from operations as a percentage of net sales was
3.1%
for the
three months ended June 30, 2019
, compared to income from operations as a percentage of net sales of
7.1%
for the same period in the prior year, a
decline
of
10.2
percentage points.
The
$5.5 million
decline
in gross profit was partially driven by lower chemical product sales and ad hoc hardware sales compared with the same period in the prior year. Average gross margins
decline
d
7.4
percentage points primarily reflecting more aggressive pricing for hardware products, including for certain Contract renewals, and the impact of weaker Euro and British Pound exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar for local currency denominated business. In addition, for chemical products, the gross margin decline resulted primarily from a higher volume of pass-through revenues. Supply costs were also higher for certain chemicals Contracts, and there were higher costs related to inventory write-downs to net realizable value.
SG&A expenses were
$13.0 million
for
three months ended June 30, 2019
, compared to
$11.8 million
same period of last year. SG&A as a percent of net sales
increase
d
2.8
percentage points. The increase in SG&A expenses of $1.2 million was
due primarily to the professional fees and warehouse related costs incurred to support performance improvement initiatives that primarily reflect investment to execute Wesco 2020 initiatives.
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2019
compared with
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2018
Net Sales
Net sales for our EMEA segment
decline
d
$7.4 million
, or
3.7%
, to
$191.7 million
for the
nine months ended June 30, 2019
, compared to
$199.1 million
for the same period in the prior year. The lower net sales for the
nine months ended June 30, 2019
, primarily reflects a decline in ad hoc hardware sales, and to lesser degree, chemical product sales, partially offset by higher hardware Contract sales compared with the same period in the prior year.
Income from Operations
Income from operations
decline
d
$14.4 million
, or
86.1%
, to
$2.3 million
for the
nine months ended June 30, 2019
, compared to
$16.7 million
for the same period in the prior year. The
$14.4 million
decline
in income from operations was comprised of a
decline
in gross profit of
$13.5 million
and an
increase
in SG&A expenses of
$0.9 million
. Income from operations as a percentage of net sales was
1.2%
for the
nine months ended June 30, 2019
, compared to
8.4%
for the same period in the prior year, a
decline
of
7.2
percentage points.
The
$13.5 million
decline
in gross profit was primarily driven by lower ad hoc hardware sales and chemical sales as well as a gross margin decline on ad hoc hardware sales, chemical sales and hardware Contract sales compared with the same period in the prior year. Average gross margins
decline
d
6.0
percentage points primarily reflecting more aggressive pricing for hardware products, including for certain Contract renewals, and the impact of weaker Euro and British Pound exchange rates for local currency denominated business. In addition, for chemical products, the gross margin decline resulted primarily from a higher volume of pass-through revenues. Supply costs were also higher for certain chemicals Contracts, and there were higher costs related to inventory write-downs to net realizable value.
The
$0.9 million
increase
in SG&A expenses primarily reflects increases in professional fees and warehouse-related costs incurred to support performance improvement initiatives that primarily reflect investment to execute Wesco 2020 initiatives. SG&A as a percent of net sales increased 1.2 percentage points.
APAC Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
APAC Results of Operations
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
14,642
|
|
|
$
|
10,029
|
|
|
$
|
39,963
|
|
|
$
|
28,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
2,713
|
|
|
$
|
2,094
|
|
|
$
|
9,054
|
|
|
$
|
7,139
|
|
Selling, general & administrative expenses
|
|
1,221
|
|
|
1,762
|
|
|
5,332
|
|
|
4,532
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$
|
1,492
|
|
|
$
|
332
|
|
|
$
|
3,722
|
|
|
$
|
2,607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(as a percentage of net sales,
numbers rounded)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
18.5
|
%
|
|
20.9
|
%
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
|
25.4
|
%
|
Selling, general & administrative expenses
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
16.1
|
%
|
Income from operations
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
compared with
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
Net Sales
Net sales for our APAC segment
increase
d
$4.6 million
, or
46.0%
, to
$14.6 million
for the
three months ended June 30, 2019
, compared to
$10.0 million
for the same period in the prior year. The
$4.6 million
increase
in net sales for the
three months ended June 30, 2019
primarily reflects increases in hardware Contract sales, chemical sales and ad hoc hardware sales compared with the same period in the prior year.
Income from Operations
Income from operations
increase
d
$1.2 million
to
$1.5 million
for the
three months ended June 30, 2019
, compared to
$0.3 million
for the same period in the prior year. The
$1.2 million
increase
in income from operations is due primarily to an
increase
in gross profit of
$0.6 million
and a decrease in SG&A expenses of $0.6 million. Income from operations as a percentage of net sales
increase
d
6.9
percentage points compared with the same period in the prior year.
The
$0.6 million
increase
in gross profit was primarily driven by increases in hardware Contract sales, chemical sales and ad hoc hardware sales compared with the same period in the prior year. Average gross margins
decline
d
2.4
percentage points due primarily to a weaker sales mix and slightly lower margins for chemical product sales, partially offset by higher margins for hardware Contract sales compared with the same period in the prior year.
The $0.6 million
decrease
in SG&A expenses was due primarily to decreases in payroll and other personnel related costs of $0.8 million, partially offset by increased rent expenses of $0.2 million reflecting investments made to grow the business in this area of the world. SG&A as a percent of net sales
decrease
d
9.3
percentage points.
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2019
compared with
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2018
Net Sales
Net sales for our APAC segment
increase
d
$11.8 million
, or
41.9%
, to
$40.0 million
for the
nine months ended June 30, 2019
, compared to
$28.2 million
for the same period in the prior year. The
$11.8 million
increase
in net sales for the
nine months ended June 30, 2019
primarily reflects increases in chemical sales and ad hoc hardware sales compared with the same period in the prior year.
Income from Operations
Income from operations
increase
d $1.1 million to
$3.7 million
for the
nine months ended June 30, 2019
, compared to
$2.6 million
for the same period in the prior year. The $1.1 million increase in income from operations is primarily due to an
increase
in gross profit of
$1.9 million
, partially offset by an
increase
in SG&A expenses of
$0.8 million
. Income from operations as a percentage of net sales
increase
d
0.1
percentage point compared with the same period in the prior year.
The
$1.9 million
increase in gross profit was primarily driven by increases in hardware Contract sales, chemical sales and ad hoc hardware sales compared with the same period in the prior year. Average gross margins
decline
d
2.7
percentage points due primarily to a weaker sales mix and lower margins for ad hoc hardware sales, partially offset by higher margins for hardware Contract sales compared with the same period in the prior year.
The
$0.8 million
increase
in SG&A expenses was due primarily to increases in payroll and other personnel related costs of $0.1 million and building and equipment costs of $0.4 million, reflecting investment being made to grow the business in this area of the world. SG&A as a percent of net sales
decrease
d
2.8
percentage points.
Unallocated Corporate Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2019
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
APAC
|
|
Unallocated Corporate Costs
|
|
Consolidated
|
2019
|
|
$
|
59,240
|
|
|
$
|
13,013
|
|
|
$
|
1,221
|
|
|
$
|
9,894
|
|
|
$
|
83,368
|
|
2018
|
|
49,553
|
|
|
11,822
|
|
|
1,762
|
|
|
11,732
|
|
|
74,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Americas
|
|
EMEA
|
|
APAC
|
|
Unallocated Corporate Costs
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
2019
|
|
$
|
167,798
|
|
|
$
|
36,545
|
|
|
$
|
5,332
|
|
|
$
|
28,864
|
|
|
$
|
238,539
|
|
2018
|
|
147,996
|
|
|
35,623
|
|
|
4,532
|
|
|
29,109
|
|
|
217,260
|
|
SG&A expenses for the Americas, EMEA and APAC segments are discussed previously. The following is a discussion of SG&A expenses not allocated to the three segments. Unallocated corporate costs include costs for corporate headquarters, along with our Wesco 2020 initiatives.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
compared with
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
Unallocated corporate costs were
$1.8 million
lower than the same period in the prior year, primarily driven by decreases in payroll related costs of $0.7 million and professional fees of $0.9 million reflecting costs for outside consultants assisting with the Company's Wesco 2020 initiatives. Unallocated costs included $4.8 million of Wesco 2020 costs in the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $7.0 million for the same period in the prior year.
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2019
compared with
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2018
Unallocated corporate costs were
$0.2 million
lower than the same period in the prior year, primarily driven by decreases in payroll related costs of $1.0 million and professional fees of $0.3 million, reflecting costs for outside consultants assisting with the Company's Wesco 2020 initiatives. Those decreases were partially offset by an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $1.1 million related to the Wesco 2020 initiatives. Unallocated costs included $13.5 million of Wesco 2020 costs in the nine months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $12.8 million for the same period in the prior year.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flow from operations and available borrowings under our revolving facility. We have historically funded our operations, debt payments, capital expenditures and discretionary funding needs from our cash from operations. We had total available cash and cash equivalents of
$45.4 million
and
$46.2 million
as of
June 30, 2019
and September 30,
2018
, respectively, of which $34.1 million, or 75.1%, and $21.3 million, or 46.1%, was held by our foreign subsidiaries as of
June 30, 2019
and September 30,
2018
, respectively. All of our cash and cash equivalents as of
June 30, 2019
and September 30,
2018
were non-restricted. All of our foreign cash and cash equivalents are readily convertible into U.S. dollars or other foreign currencies.
Our primary uses of cash currently are for:
|
|
|
•
|
Operating expenses;
|
•
|
Working capital requirements to fund the growth of our business, principally inventory;
|
•
|
Capital expenditures that primarily relate to IT equipment, software development and implementation and our warehouse operations; and
|
•
|
Debt service requirements, including interest expense, for borrowings under the Credit Facilities (as defined below under “—Credit Facilities”).
|
Generally, cash provided by operating activities has been adequate to fund our operations. Due to fluctuations in our cash flows, including for investment in working capital to fund growth in operations, it is necessary from time to time to borrow under our revolving facility to meet cash demands. Provided we are in compliance with applicable covenants, we can borrow up to $180.0 million on our revolving credit facility of which
$141.0 million
was available as of
June 30, 2019
. We anticipate that cash provided by operating activities, cash and cash equivalents and borrowing capacity under our revolving facility will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements for the next twelve months. For additional information about our revolving facility, see “—Credit Facilities” below. As of
June 30, 2019
, we did not have any material capital expenditure commitments.
Cash Flows
Our cash and cash equivalents declined by
$0.8 million
during the
nine
months ended
June 30, 2019
. The decrease was primarily due to cash used in investing and financing activities, partially offset by cash provided by operating activities.
A summary of our operating, investing and financing activities are shown in the following table (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows data:
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
32,417
|
|
|
$
|
25,380
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
33,722
|
|
|
43,819
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
66,139
|
|
|
69,199
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities
|
|
(16,825
|
)
|
|
(88,264
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
49,314
|
|
|
(19,065
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
(16,481
|
)
|
|
(4,009
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
(33,499
|
)
|
|
7,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
(293
|
)
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(804
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,037
|
)
|
Operating Activities
Our cash flows from operating activities fluctuate based on the level of profitability during the period as well as the timing of investments in inventory, collections of cash from our customers, payments of cash to our suppliers, and the timing of cash payments or receipts associated with other working capital accounts such as changes in our prepaid expenses and accrued liabilities or the timing of our tax payments.
Our operating activities provided
$49.3 million
of cash in the
nine months ended June 30, 2019
, a
$68.4 million
increase from the
$19.1 million
of cash used in operating activities for the same period in the prior year. The
$68.4 million
increase in net cash provided by operating activities reflects a $3.0 million decrease in cash provided from net income excluding non-cash items and a series of year-over-year differences in balance sheet changes increasing cash provided by operations for
$71.4 million
. Comparing the
nine months ended June 30, 2019
with the
nine months ended June 30, 2018
, the key balance sheet changes include:
|
|
•
|
a favorable change of
$83.1 million
as a result of lower cash used for inventory,
|
|
|
•
|
a
$24.3 million
favorable difference in the change for accounts payable due to the timing of payments and accruals,
|
|
|
•
|
a
$3.3 million
unfavorable impact due to higher accounts receivable largely driven by the timing of collections along with increased sales,
|
|
|
•
|
a
$15.5 million
unfavorable impact due to a change in accrued expenses and other liabilities as a result of the timing of accruals and actual payments,
|
|
|
•
|
a net
$9.0 million
unfavorable change in combined income taxes payable and receivable, and
|
|
|
•
|
an
$8.1 million
unfavorable difference in the change in prepaid expenses and other assets.
|
Investing Activities
Our investing activities used
$16.5 million
of cash during the
nine months ended June 30, 2019
as compared to $4.0 million used during the
nine months ended June 30, 2018
. Investing activities consist primarily of software development and implementation and the purchase of property and equipment related to Wesco 2020 initiatives.
Financing Activities
Our financing activities used $
33.5 million
cash during the
nine months ended June 30, 2019
, which consisted primarily of $73 million and $15.0 million for repayments of our borrowings under our revolving facility and long-term debt, respectively, and $2.1 million for repayments of our capital lease obligations, partially offset by
$57.0 million
of short-term borrowings (see Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1. of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q).
Our financing activities were a net source of $7.3 million of cash during the
nine months ended June 30, 2018
, which consisted primarily of $67.5 million of short-term borrowings, partially offset by $41.0 million and $15.0 million for repayments of our borrowings under our revolving facility and long-term debt, respectively, $2.2 million for repayments of our capital lease obligations and a $1.9 million payment for debt issuance costs.
Credit Facilities
The credit agreement, dated as of December 7, 2012 (as amended, the Credit Agreement), by and among the Company, Wesco Aircraft Hardware Corp. and the lenders and agents party thereto, which governs our senior secured credit facilities, provides for (1) a $400.0 million senior secured term loan A facility (the term loan A facility), (2) a $180.0 million revolving facility (the revolving facility) and (3) a $525.0 million senior secured term loan B facility (the term loan B facility). We refer to the term loan A facility, the revolving facility and the term loan B facility, together, as the “Credit Facilities.” See Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1. of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a summary of the Credit Facilities and the Credit Agreement.
As of
June 30, 2019
, our outstanding indebtedness under our Credit Facilities was
$823.6 million
, which consisted of (1)
$345.0 million
of indebtedness under the term loan A facility, (2)
$38.0 million
of indebtedness under the revolving facility, and (3)
$440.6 million
of indebtedness under the term loan B facility. As of
June 30, 2019
, a
$1.0 million
letter of credit was outstanding and
$141.0 million
was available for borrowing under the revolving facility to fund our operating and investing activities without breaching any covenants contained in the Credit Agreement.
As disclosed in Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part 1, Item 1. of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our borrowings under the Credit Facilities are subject to a financial covenant based upon our Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio, with the maximum ratio set at 5.25 for the quarter ended
June 30, 2019
. In addition, the Excess Cash Flow Percentage (as such term is defined in the Credit Agreement) is currently set at 75%, provided that the Excess Cash Flow Percentage shall be reduced to (1) 50%, if the Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio is less than 4.00 but greater than or equal to 3.00, (2) 25%, if the Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio is less than 3.00 but greater than or equal to 2.50, and (3) 0%, if the Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio is less than 2.50. The excess cash flow payment calculation is determined annually, and for fiscal year 2018, no excess cash flow payment was required.
The Credit Agreement also contains customary negative covenants, including restrictions on our and our restricted subsidiaries’ ability to merge and consolidate with other companies, incur indebtedness, grant liens or security interests on assets, make acquisitions, loans, advances or investments, pay dividends, sell or otherwise transfer assets, optionally prepay or modify terms of any junior indebtedness or enter into transactions with affiliates. As of
June 30, 2019
, we were in compliance with all of the foregoing covenants, and our Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio was
4.02
.
A breach of the Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio covenant or any of other covenants contained in the Credit Agreement could result in an event of default in which case the lenders may elect to declare all outstanding amounts to be immediately due and payable. If the debt under the Credit Facilities were to be accelerated, our available cash would not be sufficient to repay our debt in full.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We are not a party to any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1. of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a summary of recent accounting pronouncements.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements (including within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) concerning Wesco and other matters. These statements may discuss goals, intentions and expectations as to future plans, trends, events, results of operations or financial condition, or otherwise, based on current beliefs of management, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management. Forward-looking statements may be accompanied by words such as “achieve,” “aim,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “drive,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “future,” “grow,” “improve,” “increase,” “intend,” “may,” “outlook,” “plan,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would” or similar words, phrases or expressions. These forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside our control. Therefore, you should not place undue reliance on such statements.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following: our inability to consummate the Merger within the anticipated time period, or at all, due to any reason, including the failure to obtain stockholder approval to adopt the Merger Agreement, the failure to obtain required regulatory approvals or the failure to satisfy the other conditions to the consummation of the Merger; the failure by Parent or Merger Sub to obtain the necessary debt and equity financing arrangements set forth in the commitment letters received in connection with the Merger; the risk that the Merger Agreement may be terminated in circumstances requiring us to pay a termination fee of approximately $39 million; the risk that the Merger disrupts our current plans and operations or diverts management’s attention from our ongoing business; the effect of the announcement of the Merger on our ability to retain and hire key personnel and maintain relationships with our customers, suppliers and others with whom we does business; the effect of the announcement of the Merger on our operating results and business generally; the amount of costs, fees and expenses related to the Merger; the risk that our stock price may decline significantly if the Merger is not consummated; the nature, cost and outcome of any litigation and other legal proceedings, including any such proceedings related to the Merger and instituted against us and others; general economic and industry conditions; conditions in the credit markets; changes in military spending; risks unique to suppliers of equipment and services to the U.S. government; risks associated with the loss of significant customers, a material reduction in purchase orders by significant customers or the delay, scaling back or elimination of significant programs on which we rely; our ability to effectively compete in our industry; risks associated with our long-term, fixed-price agreements that have no guarantee of future sales volumes; our ability to effectively manage our inventory; our suppliers’ ability to provide us with the products we sell in a timely manner, in adequate quantities and/or at a reasonable cost, while also meeting our customers’ quality standards;
our abil
ity to maintain effective information technology systems and effectively implement our new warehouse management system; our ability to successfully execute and realize the expected financial benefits from our “Wesco 2020” initiative; our ability to retain key personnel; risks associated with our international operations, including exposure to foreign currency movements; changes in trade policies; risks associated with assumptions we make in connection with our critical accounting estimates (including goodwill, excess and obsolete inventory and valuation allowance of our deferred tax assets) and legal proceedings; changes in U.S. income tax law; our dependence on third-party package delivery companies; fuel price risks; fluctuations in our financial results from period-to-period; environmental risks; risks related to the handling, transportation and storage of chemical products; risks related to the aerospace industry and the regulation thereof; risks related to our indebtedness; and other risks and uncertainties.
The foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive. You should carefully consider the foregoing factors and the other risks and uncertainties that affect our business, including those described under Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in the 2018 Form 10-K, Part II, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the other documents we file from time to time with the SEC. All forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (including information included or incorporated by reference herein) are based upon information available to us as of the date hereof, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.