625 N.
Washington Street, Suite 301
Alexandria,
Virginia 22314
[Date]
, 2010
Dear
Fellow Stockholders:
You are
cordially invited to attend a Special Meeting of Stockholders of Comtex News
Network, Inc. (the “Company” or “Comtex”) to be held on
[date]
, 2010 at
[time]
a.m. (Eastern Standard
Time) at the
[location]
.
At this
meeting, you will be asked to vote, in person or by proxy, on the following
matters: (i) the election of six directors to the Company’s Board of Directors;
(ii) a proposal to approve amendments to the Company’s Certificate of
Incorporation which would (a) effect a reverse stock split pursuant to which
each 1,000 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock, par value $0.01
(“Common Stock”), will be converted into one share of Common Stock (with
shareholders owning less than one share of Common Stock after giving effect to
the reverse stock split receiving a cash payment of $0.29 per share) (the
“Reverse Stock Split”), (b) reduce the number of authorized shares of Common
Stock, and (c) permit actions of the Company’s stockholders to be taken by
written consent; (iii) the ratification of the appointment of Turner, Stone
& Co., LLP as the Company’s independent auditors; and (iv) any other
business as may properly come before the meeting.
The text of the proposed amendments to
the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation referred to in item (ii) above is set
forth in the accompanying Proxy Statement. If item (ii) is approved
and carried out as described, the Company will have fewer than 500
stockholders. The purpose of the amendment related to the Reverse
Stock Split is to permit Comtex to terminate the registration of its Common
Stock under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)
and cease being a reporting public company. In such event, the Common
Stock will no longer be publicly traded, and the Company will no longer file
certain periodic reports with the SEC as required under the Exchange
Act.
The Board of Directors has fully
reviewed and considered the terms and conditions of the proposed Reverse Stock
Split (including the payment of cash in lieu of the issuance of fractional
shares) and has unanimously determined that the transaction, taken as a whole,
is fair to, and in best interests of, the Company’s
stockholders. Promptly following the completion of the Reverse Stock
Split, the Company will send a form of letter of transmittal to all stockholders
for their use in converting their stock certificates into cash and/or
surrendering their old stock certificates for new stock
certificates. Please do not send in your stock certificates until you
receive the form of letter of transmittal.
|
Sincerely,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.W.
Gilluly
|
|
|
Chairman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chip
Brian
|
|
|
President
and CEO
|
|
Comtex
News Network, Inc.
Notice
of Special Meeting of Stockholders
[Date],
2010
TO THE
STOCKHOLDERS:
NOTICE IS
HEREBY GIVEN that a Special Meeting of Stockholders (the “Special Meeting”) of
Comtex News Network, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company” or “Comtex”),
is scheduled to be held on
[date]
, 2010 at
[time]
a.m. (Eastern Standard
Time), at the
[location]
for the following purposes:
|
1.
|
To
elect six directors to serve for the term of office specified in the
accompanying Proxy Statement and until their successors are duly elected
and qualified;
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
To
approve amendments to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation which
would (a) effect a reverse stock split pursuant to which each 1,000 shares
of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock, par value $0.01 (“Common
Stock”), will be converted into one share of Common Stock (with
shareholders owning less than one share of Common Stock after giving
effect to the reverse stock split receiving a cash payment of $0.29 per
share) (the “Reverse Stock Split”), (b) reduce the number of authorized
shares of the Common Stock, and (c) permit actions of the Company’s
stockholders to be taken by written consent.
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
To
ratify the appointment of Turner, Stone & Co. LLP as independent
auditors for the Company for fiscal year 2010; and
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
To
transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting and
any adjournment thereof.
|
Only
stockholders of record at the close of business on February 4, 2010 are entitled
to notice of, and to vote at, the Special Meeting and any adjournment
thereof. All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Special
Meeting in person. However, to assure your representation at the
meeting, you are urged to download, complete, sign and date the proxy card and
vote it promptly. Stockholders who have submitted a proxy card may
revoke their proxy in writing, or by attending the meeting and voting in
person.
Comtex is
making the proxy materials available to its stockholders on the Internet on
[date]
, 2010. You may
read, print and download the Company’s 2009 Annual Report on Form
10K and the Proxy Statement at
[Internet
address]
. On
[date]
, 2010, the Company
mailed a notice to its stockholders containing instructions on how to access the
proxy materials online. In addition, ten days after mailing such notice, the
Company will mail a proxy card and voting instructions to stockholders for
voting their shares. On an ongoing basis, stockholders may request to receive
proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by
e-mail.
|
FOR
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.
Amber Gordon
|
|
|
Corporate
Secretary
|
|
Alexandria,
Virginia
[Date]
, 2010
Comtex
News Network, Inc.
PROXY
STATEMENT
GENERAL
INFORMATION
Proxy
Solicitation
This
Proxy Statement is furnished to the holders of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per
share (“Common Stock”), of Comtex News Network, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company” or “Comtex”), in connection with the solicitation on behalf of
the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) of proxies to be used at the
Special Meeting of Stockholders (the “Special Meeting”), which will be held on
[date]
, 2010 at
[time]
a.m. (Eastern
Standard Time) at the
[location]
, or at any
adjournment thereof, pursuant to the accompanying Notice of Special Meeting of
Stockholders. The purposes of the Special Meeting and the matters to
be acted upon are set forth in the accompanying Notice of Special Meeting of
Stockholders. The Board is not currently aware of any other matters that will
come before the Special Meeting.
Pursuant
to SEC Notice and Access regulations, the Company has chosen to post all proxy
materials on a public, independent Internet Website (the “Website”) and send the
Company’s stockholders a notice (the “Notice”) specifying precisely where the
materials are available and how to access them. If a stockholder
wishes to receive printed copies of the materials, the instructions on how to
request such materials are also contained in the Notice. Furthermore,
the Company will make arrangements with brokerage houses and other custodians,
nominees and fiduciaries to send such Notice to the beneficial owners of shares
and will reimburse them for their expenses in so doing.
Revocability
and Voting of Proxy
A form of
proxy card (the “Proxy Card”) for use at the Special Meeting is posted on the
Website, and can be downloaded and mailed to the address specified on the Proxy
Card. Stockholders may revoke the authority granted by their
execution of Proxy Cards at any time before their effective exercise by filing
with the Corporate Secretary of the Company a written notice of revocation or a
duly executed Proxy Card bearing a later date, or by voting in person at the
Special Meeting. Shares of Common Stock represented by executed and
unrevoked Proxy Cards will be voted in accordance with the choice or
instructions specified thereon. If executed Proxy Cards are returned
to the Company with no provided specifications, the proxies intend to vote the
shares of Common Stock represented thereby in favor of the nominee(s) for
director set forth in Proposal No. 1 below, and to approve Proposals No. 2 and 3
as set forth below and, in accordance with their best judgment, on any other
matters which may properly come before the Special Meeting.
Record
Date and Voting Rights
Only
stockholders of record at the close of business on February 4, 2010 are entitled
to notice of, and to vote at, the Special Meeting. As of February 4,
2010, 15,794,200 shares of Common Stock were issued and
outstanding. This is the only class of shares authorized by the
Company for which stock is outstanding. Each share of Common Stock is
entitled to a single non-cumulative vote on all matters that may properly come
before the Special Meeting. The holders of a majority of the votes of
shares of Common Stock entitled to vote at the Special Meeting will constitute a
quorum at the Special Meeting.
Under Delaware law, (i) a
plurality of the votes cast at the Special Meeting is necessary to elect
directors; (ii) the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding
shares of Common Stock represented in person or by proxy at the Special Meeting
is required to approve amendments to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation
which would (a) effect a reverse stock split pursuant to which each 1,000 shares
of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock will be converted into one share of
Common Stock (with shareholders owning less than one share of Common Stock after
giving effect to the reverse stock split receiving a cash payment of $0.29 per
share) (the “Reverse Stock Split”), (b) reduce the number of authorized shares
of the Company’s Common Stock, and (c) permit actions of the Company’s
stockholders to be taken by written consent; and (iii) the affirmative vote
of a majority of the votes cast at the Special Meeting is required to ratify the
appointment of Turner, Stone & Co. LLP as the Company’s independent auditors
for the fiscal year 2010. Broker “non-votes” and shares of Common
Stock as to which a stockholder abstains from voting are included for the
purposes of determining whether a quorum of stockholders is present at the
Special Meeting. A broker “non-vote” occurs when a nominee holding
shares of Common Stock for a beneficial owner does not have discretionary voting
power with respect to a proposal set forth in this Proxy Statement and has not
received voting instructions from the beneficial owner. Brokers will
not have discretionary voting power with respect to Proposal 2, so broker
non-votes will have the same effect as a vote “against” Proposal 2.
Votes at
the Special Meeting will be tabulated by Inspectors of Election appointed by the
Company.
STOCKHOLDER
LIST
A list of
stockholders entitled to vote at the Special Meeting will be available at the
Company’s offices, located at 625 N. Washington Street, Suite 301, Alexandria,
Virginia 22314, for a period of ten days prior to the Special Meeting for
examination by any stockholder, and at the Special Meeting itself.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This Proxy Statement contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”). These statements are subject to a variety of risks and
uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, which could cause
actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in these
forward-looking statements. In particular, the risks and
uncertainties include those described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009, and in the Company’s other periodic
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) filings. These risks and
uncertainties include, among other things, the consolidation of the Internet
news market; competition with the Company’s markets; the financial stability of
the Company’s customers; maintaining a secure and reliable news-delivery
network; maintaining relationships with key content providers; attracting and
retaining key personnel; the volatility of the Common Stock price; control of
operating expenses; and successful marketing of the Company’s services to
current and new customers.
PROPOSAL
NO. 1
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
Pursuant to the Company’s
Certificate of Incorporation, each member of the Board serves for a three-year
term, and the Board is divided into three classes with terms expiring in
successive years. Accordingly, the six nominees are being nominated for election
to serve on the Board for varying terms, as follows: (i) for the term expiring
in 2011 will be Messrs. Hendricks and Lynch; (ii) for the term expiring in 2012
will be Dr. Gilluly and Mr. Howard; and (iii) for the term expiring in 2013 will
be Messrs. Brian and VanBennekom. All nominees have consented to be
named and have indicated their intent to serve on the Board, if
elected.
The names
of the nominees and certain other information about them are set forth
below:
|
|
|
|
|
Chip
Brian
|
|
39
|
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
C.W.
Gilluly, Ed.D.
|
|
64
|
|
Chairman
|
Erik
Hendricks
|
|
66
|
|
Director
|
William
J. Howard
|
|
62
|
|
Director
|
Robert
J. Lynch, Jr.
|
|
76
|
|
Director
|
Pieter
VanBennekom
|
|
64
|
|
Director
|
CHIP
BRIAN, 39, has not previously served as a director of the
Company. Mr. Brian was appointed Chief Executive Officer in November
2006, in addition to his role as President of the Company. He had
been named President and Chief Operating Officer in May 2005 and served as Vice
President, Operations since April 2004. Mr. Brian has extensive
experience in providing operating management and technology solutions to
companies in the financial services industry. From 2003 until 2004,
he was the Manager, Product Operations Group for Nyfix Incorporated, where his
responsibilities included providing management solutions for technicians serving
the broker community on the floor of the New York Stock
Exchange. From the end of 2000 until 2003, Mr. Brian was the Manager,
Trading Support Operations for the BNY Brokerage division of The Bank of New
York.
C.W.
GILLULY, Ed.D., 64, has served as a director of the Company since
1992. He served as President from June 1992 until September 1997, as
Chairman of the Board from June 1992 until December 2002 and from February 2004
until the present, as Vice-Chairman from December 2002 through June 2003 and as
interim Chief Executive Officer from February 2004 until November
2006. Dr. Gilluly has served as Chairman of the Board and President
of AMASYS Corporation and its predecessor, Infotechnology, Inc., since June
1992. Dr. Gilluly also served as a director of Analex Corporation
until March 2003, and as a director of Mobile Nation, Inc., from October 2003
through June 2008.
WILLIAM
J. HOWARD, 62, has served as a director of the Company since January
2003. Mr. Howard has extensive experience in journalism and is
currently President of Visitors TV Network, the premiere producer of hotel and
destination videos in the United States. Mr. Howard has also
participated in real estate development and the restoration of historical
sites. In Maryland, he has received Governor’s Citations from three
different governors for his community service work, particularly in Talbot
County.
ROBERT J.
LYNCH, JR., 76, has served as a director of the Company since January
2003. Mr. Lynch has been President of American & Foreign
Enterprises, Inc. (“AFE”), an investment firm, for more than 20
years. Among its many enterprises, AFE is partnered with Hochtief,
A.G., Germany’s largest engineering/construction group. AFE has
worked with international investment banks such as Goldman Sachs & Co., BV
Bank of Munich and Citibank. Mr. Lynch has been a director of many
public companies including AMASYS, Dames & Moore, Data Broadcasting
Corporation, and Turner Construction Company. Mr. Lynch also serves
as a director of IX Energy, a solar and renewable energy solutions
provider.
ERIK
HENDRICKS, 65, has served as a director of the Company since
1991. Now retired, Mr. Hendricks served as the Executive Director and
Chief Operating Officer of the Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of
Cruelty to Animals, a non-profit humane society, for more than twenty five
years.
PIETER
VANBENNEKOM, 64, has served as a director of the Company since February
2004. Mr. VanBennekom has extensive experience in the news,
information and publishing industries and has worked with Progressive Business
Publications, Inc. (“PBP”) a diversified business information services
publishing company, since 1994. He joined PBP as Senior Editor,
became Group Publisher in 1996 and was promoted to Editorial Director, in
1998. Prior to joining PBP, Mr. VanBennekom worked with the worldwide
wire service United Press International (“UPI”) for more than 20 years, where
his final position was President and CEO.
Executive
Officers
The
following table contains information as of February 4, 2010 as to the executive
officers of the Company who are not also directors of the Company:
Name
|
Age
|
Office Held With Company
|
|
|
|
Kathy
Ballard
|
58
|
Vice
President, Operations
|
|
|
|
Paul
Sledz
|
51
|
Controller
and Treasurer
|
Ms.
Ballard’s career includes more than twenty years in various research and
management positions in the information industry. She has been with
Comtex since 1999, where she served as Director, Product Operations/Client
Services until assuming her present position in 2004. Previously, she
worked with LEXIS/NEXIS for more than twelve years, held positions in the
education arena and worked with the New York Times Information
Service.
Mr. Sledz
joined Comtex in March 2007 as Controller and was appointed Treasurer in May
2007. Mr. Sledz has broad accounting and financial management
experience, with both large corporations and entrepreneurial
businesses. He came to the Company from General Dynamics, where he
had been Finance Manager for an Information Systems division since
2005. Beginning in 2000, he served as the Manager of Corporate
Planning and Budgeting for the Airline Tariff Publishing Company.
There are
no family relationships among the directors or executive officers of the
Company.
Meetings
of the Board
The Board
held a total of seven meetings during the Company’s fiscal year ended June 30,
2009. Each director attended in person or telephonically at least 80%
of the meetings held.
Committees
of the Board
The
Audit Committee
The Audit
Committee, which held five meetings during fiscal year 2009, is comprised of
Messrs. Lynch, Howard and VanBennekom. The Audit Committee selects
and engages the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, reviews
and evaluates the Company’s audit and control functions, reviews the results and
scope of the audit and other services provided by the Company’s independent
registered public accounting firm, and performs such other duties as may from
time to time be determined by the Board. The Board has determined
that Mr. Lynch is an “audit committee financial expert.” Each of
Messrs. Lynch, Howard and VanBennekom is an “independent director” as defined in
Rule 5605 of the Marketplace Rules of NASDAQ.
Report
of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
The Audit
Committee has issued a report that states as follows:
We have
reviewed and discussed with management the Company’s audited consolidated
financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009;
We have
discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters
required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61;
and
We have
received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered
public accounting firm required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1,
“Independence Discussions with Audit Committees,” and have discussed with the
registered public accounting firm their independence.
Based on
the review and discussions referred to above, we recommend to the Board that the
audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.
|
Submitted
by the Audit Committee
|
|
|
Robert
J. Lynch, Jr., Chairman
|
|
|
William
J. Howard
|
|
|
Pieter
VanBennekom
|
|
The
preceding report on Audit Committee procedures shall not be deemed incorporated
by reference into any of the Company’s previous filings under the Securities Act
or the Exchange Act which might incorporate filings made by the Company under
those acts, nor will such report be incorporated by reference into any future
filings made by the Company under those acts, except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporate this information by reference.
The
Compensation Committee
The
Compensation Committee of the Board, which held five meetings during fiscal year
2009, is comprised of Messrs. Howard, Hendricks, Lynch and
VanBennekom. The Compensation Committee evaluates management’s
recommendations and makes its own recommendations to the Board concerning the
compensation of the Company’s executive officers. It is also
responsible for the formulation of the Company’s executive compensation policy
and the research, analysis and subsequent recommendation regarding the
administration of the Company’s 1995 Stock Option Plan, which expired in October
2005, and the Company’s 2003 Stock Incentive Plan.
Compliance
with IRC Section 162(m)
Section
162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “IRC”) disallows a
tax deduction to publicly held companies for compensation paid to certain of
their executive officers, to the extent that such compensation, whether payable
in cash or stock, exceeds $1 million per covered officer in any fiscal
year. The limitation applies only to compensation that is not
considered to be performance-based. Non-performance-based
compensation paid to the Company’s executive officers for the 2009 fiscal year
did not exceed the $1 million limit per officer, and the Compensation Committee
does not anticipate that any non-performance-based compensation payable to the
executive officers for the 2009 fiscal year will exceed such
limit. Because it is unlikely that the actual compensation payable to
any of the Company’s executive officers in the foreseeable future will approach
the $1 million limit, the Compensation Committee has decided at this time not to
take any action to limit or restructure the elements of cash compensation
payable to the Company’s executive officers. The Compensation
Committee shall reconsider this decision should the individual cash compensation
of any executive officer ever approach the $1 million level.
The
preceding report on executive compensation shall not be deemed incorporated by
reference into any of the Company’s previous filings under the Securities Act or
the Exchange Act which might incorporate filings made by the Company under those
acts, nor will such report be incorporated by reference into any future filings
made by the Company under those acts, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporate this information by reference.
The
Executive Committee
The
Executive Committee of the Board, which held no meetings during fiscal year
2009, is comprised of Messrs. VanBennekom, Hendricks and Lynch. The
Executive Committee is chartered to act in place of the full Board between Board
meetings, if actions are required, and to fulfill the function of reviewing any
initial merger and acquisition and/or partnering proposals.
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board, which held no
meetings during fiscal year 2009, is comprised of Messrs. Hendricks, Howard and
VanBennekom. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets
in order to evaluate and nominate candidates for membership to the Board and to
serve as officers of the Company.
Executive
Compensation
Summary
Compensation Table
The
following table sets forth information concerning all compensation paid or
accrued by the Company to its Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial
Officer and the other executive officers who earned total compensation in excess
of $100,000 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009:
Name
and
principal
position
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Stock
awards
|
|
|
Option
awards
|
|
Nonequity
incentive plan compensation
|
|
|
Nonqualified
deferred compensation earnings
|
|
|
All other
compensation
(4)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chip
Brian
(1)
|
2009
|
|
$
|
230,847
|
|
|
$
|
94,630
|
|
|
$
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
360,477
|
|
President
and
|
2008
|
|
|
213,062
|
|
|
|
168,888
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
381,950
|
|
Chief
Executive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kathy
Ballard
(2)
|
2009
|
|
$
|
121,549
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
121,549
|
|
VP
Content
|
2008
|
|
|
117,123
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
127,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul
Sledz
(3)
|
2009
|
|
$
|
116,860
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
116,860
|
|
Controller/
|
2008
|
|
|
105,656
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
105,656
|
|
Treasurer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
____________________________
(1)
|
Mr.
Brian was appointed Vice President, Operations in April 2004 and was
appointed President and Chief Operating Officer in May 2005, and President
and CEO in November 2006.
|
(2)
|
Ms.
Ballard was appointed Vice President of Content in May
2004.
|
(3)
|
Mr.
Sledz was appointed Treasurer in May of 2007.
|
(4)
|
In
the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, there were no perquisites
exceeding $10,000 for the above referenced
years.
|
Agreements
with Executives
On
October 31, 2008, Comtex entered into a new employment agreement (the
“Employment Agreement”) with its President and Chief Executive Officer, Chip
Brian (the “Officer”). The Employment Agreement is for a two-year
term, effective October 1, 2008, and may be extended by written agreement
between the parties. The Officer will receive an annual base salary
of $235,000, to be increased to $250,000 on October 1, 2009. The
Officer is eligible for annual and incentive bonuses, and is eligible to
participate in Company-sponsored employee benefit plans.
The
Officer owned an option to purchase 750,000 shares of Common Stock (the
“Option”) granted under the Company’s option plans, the exercise price of which
was significantly higher than the current trading price of shares of the
Company’s Common Stock. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Officer
forfeited the Option in exchange for a grant of 500,000 shares of unregistered
Common Stock, effective as of December 3, 2008.
Under the
Agreement, upon the Officer’s termination for any reason other than for cause or
voluntarily by the Officer without good reason during the one-year period
subsequent to an occurrence of a “change in control” (as defined in the
Employment Agreement), the Company shall pay the Officer a cash lump sum equal
to the greater of his annual base salary or the remainder of the salary due for
the term of the Employment Agreement. The Employment Agreement also
contains non-competition and non-solicitation provisions.
Stock
Option Grants
There
were no stock options granted during the fiscal year ended June 30,
2009. No stock options were exercised during the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2009.
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
|
|
|
Name
and
principal
position
|
|
Number
of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options
exercisable
|
|
|
Number
of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options
unexercisable
|
|
|
Equity
incentive
plan
awards:
Number
of
securities
underlying
unexercised
unearned
options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chip
Brian
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
7/15/2014
|
President
and
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
7/16/2014
|
Chief
Executive
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
5/20/2015
|
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kathy
Ballard
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
10/1/2011
|
VP
Content
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
1/2/2012
|
|
|
|
15,800
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
3/12/2013
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
3/19/2014
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
7/15/2014
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
9/25/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul
Sledz
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Treasurer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There
were no outstanding stock awards at the end of fiscal 2009.
Stock Option
Plans
In
October 1995, the Board approved the Comtex News Network, Inc. 1995 Stock Option
Plan (the “1995 Plan”), which was approved by stockholders in December
1995. In July 2003, the Board approved the Comtex News Network, Inc.
2003 Incentive Stock Plan, which was approved by stockholders in October
2003. The plans provide for the issuance of incentive stock options
(within the meaning of Section 422 of the IRC) and non-qualified stock options
and stock awards in order to recruit and retain key employees, consultants and
directors. The 1995 Plan has expired and the Company currently has no
plan to renew it or replace it with a new stock option plan.
Compensation
of Directors
The
following table discloses total compensation paid to the Company’s directors for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Fees
earned
or
paid
in
cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-equity
incentive
plan
compensation
|
|
|
Nonqualified
deferred
compensation
earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.W.
Gilluly
(1)
|
|
$
|
39,282
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
39,282
|
|
Erik
Hendricks
(2)
|
|
$
|
9,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
9,000
|
|
William
J. Howard
(2)
|
|
$
|
9,500
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
9,500
|
|
Robert
J. Lynch, Jr.
(2)
|
|
$
|
9,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
9,000
|
|
Pieter
VanBennekom
(2)
|
|
$
|
9,500
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
9,500
|
|
____________________________
(1)
|
Dr.
Gilluly is paid a salary by the Company, but is not compensated for Board
Meetings
|
(2)
|
All
amounts represent fees paid for Board
Meetings.
|
Non-employee
members of the Board are paid a fee of $1,000 per meeting
attended. Members of Board Committees are paid an additional fee of
$500 per Committee Meeting, but only if such meeting is held on a different day
than the Board Meeting.
Dr.
Gilluly is employed as Chairman of the Company, through June 30, 2010, for an
annual salary of $60,000.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None.
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
Persons
and groups who beneficially own in excess of 5% of the Common Stock are required
to file certain reports with the SEC regarding such ownership. Based
on these reports, the following table sets forth, as of January 10, 2010, the
shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by persons who beneficially own more
than 5% of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock.
Beneficial
Ownership of Common Stock
The
following table sets forth information as of January 10, 2010 regarding the
beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock, of (i) each person known to the
Company to be the beneficial owner, within the meaning of Section 13(d) of the
Exchange Act, of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, (ii)
each director of the Company, (iii) each executive officer of the Company named
in the Summary Compensation Table (
see
“Executive Compensation”
above), and (iv) all executive officers and directors of the Company as a
group. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each named
beneficial owner is c/o Comtex News Network, Inc., 625 N. Washington Street,
Suite 301, Alexandria, Virginia 22314. Except to the extent indicated
in the footnotes, each of the beneficial owners named below has sole voting and
investment power with respect to the shares of Common Stock
listed.
Name
and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Amount
and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Tepco
Ltd.
The
Continental Building
25
Church Street, Hamilton HM 12, Bermuda
|
|
|
3,669,924
|
|
|
|
23.2
|
%
|
Dr.
and Mrs. Hanina and Amy Hibshoosh
560
Riverside Dr., New York, NY 10027
|
|
|
970,725
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
C.W.
Gilluly, Ed.D., Chairman
|
|
|
2,537,506
|
(2)
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
Erik
Hendricks, Director
|
|
|
75,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
*
|
|
William
J. Howard, Director
|
|
|
30,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robert
J. Lynch, Jr., Director
|
|
|
30,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Pieter
VanBennekom, Director
|
|
|
20,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Chip
Brian, President and CEO
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
Kathy
Ballard, VP Content
|
|
|
205,880
|
(7)
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Paul
Sledz, Treasurer and Controller
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
Directors and executive officers as a group
(8
Persons)
|
|
|
4,148,386
|
(8)
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
*
|
|
Less
than 1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
______________________________
|
(1)
|
Beneficial
ownership is direct and no shares are pledged as collateral unless
otherwise indicated.
|
(2)
|
Includes
370,000 shares of Common Stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of
vested options granted under the Comtex News Network, Inc. 1995 Stock
Option Plan and the 2003 Stock Option Plan, and 2,167,506 shares of Common
Stock held jointly by Dr. Gilluly and his spouse.
|
(3)
|
Includes
60,000 shares of Common Stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of
vested options granted under the Comtex News Network, Inc. 1995 Stock
Option Plan.
|
(4)
|
Includes
30,000 shares of Common Stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of
vested options granted under the Comtex News Network, Inc. 1995 Stock
Option Plan.
|
(5)
|
Includes
20,000 shares of Common Stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of
vested options granted under the Comtex News Network, Inc. 1995 Stock
Option Plan
|
(6)
|
Includes
750,000 shares of Common Stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of
vested options granted under the Comtex News Network, Inc. 1995 Stock
Option Plan.
|
(7)
|
Includes
197,800 shares of Common Stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of
vested options granted under the Comtex News Network, Inc. 1995 Stock
Option Plan.
|
(8)
|
Includes
1,457,800 shares of Common Stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of
vested options granted under the Comtex News Network, Inc. 1995 Stock
Option Plan and the 2003 Stock Option
Plan.
|
Independent
Directors
The Board
has determined that all of its current directors are “independent” as defined in
the NASDAQ corporate governance listing standards except for C.W. Gilluly due to
his position as an employee of Comtex.
THE
BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE
FOR
THE
ELECTION OF THE DIRECTORS NAMED AS THE NOMINEES.
PROPOSAL
NO. 2
APPROVAL
OF AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPANY’S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO
(A)
EFFECT THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT, (B) REDUCE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED
SHARES
OF
COMMON STOCK, AND (C) PERMIT STOCKHOLDER ACTIONS BY WRITTEN CONSENT
Purpose
of and Reasons for the Reverse Stock Split
Purpose
The
purpose of the Reverse Stock Split is to reduce the number of stockholders of
record of the Company to fewer than 500, which will allow the Company to
terminate the registration of the Common Stock under the Exchange Act, thereby
suspending the Company’s duty to file periodic reports with the SEC under the
Exchange Act. If the number of record holders were reduced to fewer
than 500, the Company would be eligible to deregister the Common Stock under the
Exchange Act and would no longer be subject to the SEC periodic filing and
reporting requirements imposed on public companies. The Company
intends to achieve this result by acquiring for cash all fractional shares of
Common Stock resulting from the Reverse Stock Split.
Stockholder
Information
As of
February 4, 2010, the Company had 459 record holders of its Common Stock, of
which 305, or 66%, each owned fewer than 1,000 shares of Common
Stock. These record holders owned in total approximately 80,400
shares, or 0.5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock.
The
average daily closing price per share of the Common Stock on the
Over-the-Counter Electronic Bulletin Board of the National Association of
Securities Dealer, Inc. (the “OTCBB”) for the ten trading days immediately
preceding the record date of the Special Meeting was $0.23 per
share.
Determination
of Price to be Paid in Cash in Lieu of Fractional Shares
The
Company chose to use a multiple-trading-day-average-price to determine the fair
value of the Common Stock. The price to be paid in cash in lieu of
the issuance of fractional shares of Common Stock represents a premium of
approximately 30% over the fair value of the Common Stock.
In order
to determine the fair price to be paid in lieu of issuing fractional shares, the
Board and the Special Transaction Committee utilized the “fair value” definition
proscribed by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles: “The price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement
date.” This method of determining fair value was selected by the
Company for several reasons: (a) it is objectively determined by
measurement of quantified factors, rather than by subjective valuation criteria;
(b) it is market-based rather than entity-specific; and (c) the input
information is the most reliable, since it is based on direct observations of
transactions (
i.e.
,
quoted prices) rather than on unobservable data or a reporting entity’s own
assumptions, which would provide less reliable data.
Reasons
for the Reverse Stock Split
Significant
Expenses Attendant to Being a Public Company
The Company incurs direct and indirect
costs in complying with the Exchange Act’s periodic filing and reporting
requirements imposed on public companies. The cost of this compliance
has increased significantly with the implementation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, as amended (“Sarbanes-Oxley”). In addition, the Company pays
substantially higher premiums for its directors’ and officers’ liability
insurance policy as a public reporting company than it would if the Common Stock
was not registered under the Exchange Act. The Company also incurs
substantial costs as a result of, among other things, the Company’s management
time expended in preparing and reviewing the Company’s periodic public
filings. The Company believes that these costs have, and are expected
to continue to have, a significant and adverse effect on the operations and
financial performance of the Company.
The cost of administering each
stockholder's account and the amount of time spent by the Company’s management
in responding to stockholder requests is the same regardless of the number of
shares held in the account. Accordingly, the burden to the Company of
maintaining many small accounts is disproportionately high when compared with
the total number of shares involved. While the Company does have an
employee whose responsibilities include managing investor relations, the
executive officers are nevertheless called upon to regularly participate in
preparing the Company’s responses to stockholder requests. This
administrative burden distracts the Company’s management from allocating their
time and energies to managing the Company’s operations and to strategic
planning. The Company believes that it and its stockholders would
significantly benefit from the elimination of the administrative burden and cost
associated with the approximately 305 record stockholders accounts containing
approximately 80,400 total shares of Common Stock.
The
Company expects that, by deregistering the Common Stock under the Exchange Act
and terminating the Company’s periodic filing and reporting obligations, it will
benefit from savings in historical costs including (a) a reduction in auditing
related fees; (b) a reduction in legal fees related to securities law compliance
and the less complicated and extensive disclosure entailed by the Company’s
private status; (c) the elimination of requisite filing fees for various
periodic filing and reporting with the SEC; (d) the expected savings in fees and
expenses of the Company’s transfer agent and others external service providers
for postage, stock transfer and other administrative expenses to service public
stockholders; (e) the lower printing and mailing costs attributable to the
reduction in the number of the Company’s stockholders; and (f) the expected
reduction in premiums for directors’ and officers’ liability
insurance. In total, the Company expects to save in excess of $95,000
per year in expenses as a result of deregistering the Common Stock under the
Exchange Act and terminating the Company’s periodic filing and reporting
obligations. The foregoing estimate is based upon (i) the actual
costs to the Company of the services and disbursements in each of the categories
described above and (ii) the allocation to each category of the Company’s
estimates of the portion of the expenses and disbursements in such category
believed to be solely or primarily attributable to the Company’s periodic public
reporting status. The actual savings the Company will realize from
becoming a private company may be higher or lower than the foregoing
estimate.
In some
instances, the Company’s cost-saving expectations set forth above were based on
information provided from external sources or upon verifiable
assumptions. For example, the Company’s auditors have informally
discussed a reduction in auditing fees if the Company ceases to be a public
company. In addition, the costs associated with retaining legal
counsel to assist with complying with the Exchange Act periodic reporting
requirements will be eliminated if the Company no longer files reports with the
SEC and is otherwise not required to comply with the disclosure requirements
that apply to publicly reporting companies. Other estimates were more
subjective and included the savings in transfer agent fees that could be
expected due to (i) the reduction in the number of accounts to be handled by the
transfer agent, (ii) the lower printing and mailing costs attributable to such a
reduction, (iii) the less complicated disclosure required by the Company’s
private status, and (iv) the reduction in direct miscellaneous clerical and
other expenses (
e.g.
,
word processing and other internal charges associated with Exchange Act filings
and the elimination of the charges imposed by brokers and banks to forward
materials to beneficial holders of Common Stock).
In
addition to these annual estimated cost savings, the completion of the Reverse
Stock Split and subsequent deregistration of the Common Stock under the Exchange
Act would enable the Company to experience significant cost savings by avoiding
expected increases in operating expenses resulting from Sarbanes-Oxley and
related regulations – specifically regarding implementation of Section 404 of
Sarbanes-Oxley. These costs are expected to comprise (i) a one-time
incremental cost of $50,000 or more in computer software and fees to external
service providers for planning, assessment, documentation and testing to comply
with the new internal-control audit requirements imposed by Section 404 of
Sarbanes-Oxley and (ii) in excess of $25,000 in annual expenses
thereafter.
By way of
comparison, assuming that the Company will save approximately $95,000 in
historical costs and $25,000 in anticipated future costs (by avoiding
implementation of Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley) by deregistering the Common
Stock under the Exchange Act and terminating the Company’s periodic filing and
reporting obligations, such estimated total savings of $120,000 would have
represented 1.9% of the Company’s revenue of $6,401,518 for the fiscal
year-ended June 30, 2009, and 130.5% of the Company net income of $91,927 for
the fiscal year-ended June 30, 2009, each as reported in the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.
The Company expects the actual cost
savings of being a non-reporting, private company to be greater than simply
eliminating the estimated historical out-of-pocket costs. The
legislative and litigation environment resulting from recent corporate
governance abuses is expected to cause the costs, compliance burdens and
potential liabilities of being a publicly reporting company to continue
increasing in the near future. The Company believes it is likely to
incur continued increased audit fees and other costs of compliance such as
securities counsel fees, increased outside director fees and increased potential
liability faced by the Company’s directors and executive officers.
Inability
to Realize Benefits Normally Realized
By
Publicly Reporting Companies
The
Company believes that neither it nor its stockholders realize many of the
benefits normally presumed to result from the Company’s publicly reporting
status. Though publicly-traded, there is a very limited trading
market for the Common Stock, especially for sales of larger blocks of
stock. The Company's small public float and limited trading volume
have restricted the stockholders’ ability to sell a significant number of their
shares without impacting the trading price of the Common
Stock. During the twelve months prior to the announcement of the
proposed Reverse Stock Split on February 5, 2010, the average daily trading
volume of the Common Stock was approximately 7,600 shares.
Furthermore,
the Company does not believe itself to be in a position to use its status as a
public company to raise capital through sales of securities in a public offering
in the future or to otherwise access the public markets to raise equity or debt
financing or to acquire other business entities using the Common Stock as the
consideration for any such acquisition. The poor performance of the
Common Stock in the public market has also been a detriment to attracting and
retaining high quality employees because of the perceived negative image that a
low stock price creates and the fact that stock options are not a meaningful
method of compensation.
Operational
Considerations
The
Reverse Stock Split will permit the Company’s management to focus on long-term
value, rather than on the short-term earnings that are often the focus of public
reporting companies. With the Company privately held, the pressure
imposed on it by the investing community to generate short-term earnings and to
disclose strategic initiatives will no longer exist, and operating decisions can
be made with a longer-term perspective.
In
addition, the disclosures contained in the Company’s Exchange Act periodic
filings, including information related to its business operations and financial
condition, are available to the public and thus can be readily analyzed by
various parties such as competitors, vendors and customers, whose interests may
be significantly disparate from with those of the Company. Moreover,
the Company does not have access to similar information concerning its
competitors, many of which are private companies, thus aggravating the Company’s
competitive disadvantage. Upon the termination of the registration of
the Common Stock under the Exchange Act and the termination of the duty to file
periodic reports with the SEC under the Exchange Act, the Company will be better
able to control the dissemination of certain business information.
Conclusion
The Company believes its and its
stockholders’ best interests would be served by eliminating the administrative
burden and costs associated with maintaining the Company’s status as a public
reporting company and its small stockholder accounts. The Company has
proposed the Reverse Stock Split at this time to allow the Company to quickly
cease incurring the expenses and burdens of being a public company (which are
expected to increase in the future) and to quickly make available to holders of
a fractional share of Common Stock (as a result of the Reverse Stock Split) a
cash payment for reinvestment or other use.
Effects
of the Reverse Stock Split
If the
Reverse Stock Split is completed, the Company intends to file a notice of
termination of registration of the Common Stock under the Exchange Act as soon
as practicable thereafter. The Reverse Stock Split is expected to
reduce the number of stockholders of record of the Company from approximately
459 to approximately 154. Upon termination of the Company’s periodic
reporting obligations under the Exchange Act, the Common Stock may be eligible
for listing and trading in the Pink Sheets® (a centralized quotation service
that collects and publishes market maker quotations for securities), as
described below. However, the completion of the Reverse Stock Split
and the deregistration of the Common Stock under the Exchange Act will likely
cause the trading market for shares of the Common Stock to be substantially
reduced or eliminated.
As the
base price of the Common Stock (the “Base Price”), the Company used the average
closing price of the Common Stock over the ten trading days prior to the
announcement of the proposed Reverse Split and the filing of the preliminary
Proxy Statement with the SEC. The price to be paid in cash in lieu of
the issuance of fractional shares of Common Stock represents a premium of
approximately 30% over the Base Price of the Common Stock.
Effects
on Stockholders Holding Fewer
Than
1,000 Shares of Common Stock
If the Reverse Stock Split is
completed, the stockholders holding fewer than 1,000 shares of Common Stock
immediately prior thereto (“Cashed-Out Stockholders”):
|
-
|
Will
not receive a fractional share of Common Stock in the
transaction;
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
Will
instead receive $0.29 in cash for each share of Common Stock held
immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split in accordance with the
procedures described in this Proxy Statement;
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
Will
have no further ownership interest in the Company and will therefore no
longer be entitled to vote on matters presented to stockholders of the
Company; and
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
Will
not have to pay any service charges or brokerage commissions in connection
with the Reverse Stock Split.
|
Cashed-Out
Stockholders holding stock certificates representing their Common Stock will
receive from the Company soon after the effective date of the completion of the
Reverse Stock Split (the “Effective Date”) a letter of transmittal containing
instructions on how to surrender their current stock certificates to the
Company’s transfer agent in exchange for their cash payments.
Effects
on Stockholders Holding
1,000
or More Shares of Common Stock
If the Reverse Stock Split is
completed, stockholders holding 1,000 or more shares of Common Stock immediately
prior thereto (“Continuing Stockholders”):
|
-
|
Will
receive (i) one share of Common Stock for each 1,000 shares of Common
Stock held immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split and (ii) $0.29 in
cash for each share of Common Stock held immediately prior to the Reverse
Stock Split exceeding 1,000 shares or a multiple of 1,000 shares owned,
both in accordance with the procedures described in this Proxy
Statement.
|
|
-
|
Will
have a reduced equity interest in the Company and reduced participation in
future potential earnings or growth as a result of the receipt of cash in
lieu of any fractional shares;
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
Will,
immediately following the completion of the Reverse Stock Split, be the
only persons entitled to vote on matters presented to stockholders of the
Company;
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
Will
experience a reduction in liquidity with respect to the Common Stock as a
result of (i) the termination of the registration and (ii) the cessation
of OTCBB trading of the Common Stock;
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
Will
no longer have the same degree of access to financial and other
information about the Company inasmuch as the Company will no longer be
required to publicly file periodic reports with the SEC under the Exchange
Act. Moreover, the executive officers of the Company will no
longer be required to certify the accuracy of the financial information
that is made available to the stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
Will
have no preemptive or other preferential rights to purchase any Common
Stock that may be issued in the future unless such rights are specifically
granted to the stockholders.
|
Continuing
Stockholders holding stock certificates representing their Common Stock will
receive from the Company soon after the Effective Date a form of letter of
transmittal containing instructions on how to surrender their current stock
certificates to the Company’s transfer agent in exchange for certificates
representing whole shares of Common Stock and any cash payments to which they
are entitled in lieu of the issuance of fractional shares of Common
Stock.
If the
Company terminates the registration of the Common Stock under the Exchange Act,
the Common Stock will not be eligible for trading on any securities market
except the Pink Sheets®, and even this source of liquidity may not be
available. In order for the Common Stock to be quoted in the Pink
Sheets®, it will be necessary that one or more broker-dealers act as market
makers and sponsor the Common Stock in the Pink Sheets®. Following
completion of the Reverse Stock Split and in the absence of current information
about the Company being filed under the Exchange Act, there can be no assurance
that any broker-dealer will be willing to act as a market maker in the Common
Stock. There is also no assurance that shares of the Common Stock
will be available to be bought or sold after the Reverse Stock
Split.
Effect
on Option Holders
If the
Reverse Stock Split is completed, the number of shares of Common Stock subject
to each outstanding stock option will be automatically decreased by a factor of
1,000, and the exercise price of each such outstanding stock option will be
automatically increased by a factor of 1,000. Any vested option for
fewer than 1,000 shares of pre-split Common Stock will be automatically
converted into a right to receive a cash payment of $0.29 per such share (less
an amount equal to the exercise price), and will result in the elimination of
any rights to acquire fractional shares of Common Stock. If the value
of this right is $0.00 or less, there will be no cash payment and the option
will be cancelled. Each option for more than 1,000 shares will be
adjusted so that the holder will own 1/1,000
th
as
many options exercisable at a price 1,000 times the pre-split exercise
price. Any unvested options for fewer than 1,000 shares of pre-split
Common Stock, regardless of exercise price, will be cancelled in the Reverse
Stock Split. The vesting schedule related to the options still
outstanding after the Reverse Stock Split will remain unchanged.
Effects
on the Company
The
Company’s Certificate of Incorporation currently authorizes the issuance of
25,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 5,000,000 shares of Preferred
Stock. Subsequent to the Reverse Stock Split, the Company’s
Certificate of Incorporation will be amended to authorize the issuance of 25,000
shares of Common Stock and 5,000 shares of Preferred Stock. As of the
record date for the Special Meeting, the number of outstanding shares of Common
Stock was 15,794,200, and there were no shares of Preferred Stock
outstanding. Based upon the Company’s best estimates, if the Reverse
Stock Split had been completed as of the record date, the number of outstanding
shares of Common Stock would have been reduced from
[
l
]
to approximately
[
l
]
, the Company
would have paid cash for approximately
[
l
]
shares and the
number of record holders of Common Stock would have been reduced from
[
l
]
to approximately
[
l
]
.
The
Company expects that upon completion of the Reverse Stock Split, the shares
beneficially owned by its directors and executive officers as a group will
represent
[
l
]
% of the then
issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock, as compared to 24%, prior to the
Reverse Stock Split.
The
Common Stock is currently registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act,
and the Company is accordingly subject to the periodic filing and reporting of
the Exchange Act. As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, the Company
will have fewer than 500 holders of record of its Common Stock and will be
eligible to terminate the registration of its shares of Common Stock and suspend
its obligation to continue periodic filing and reporting under the Exchange
Act. Following the completion of the Reverse Stock Split, the Company
intends to file a Form 15 with the SEC in order to terminate the registration of
its shares of Common Stock and suspend its obligation to continue periodic
filing and reporting under the Exchange Act.
In
connection with the Reverse Stock Split, the Company has filed with the SEC a
Transaction Statement on Schedule 13E-3 pursuant to Rule 13e-3 under the
Exchange Act (the "Schedule 13E-3"), which incorporates by reference the
information contained in this Proxy Statement regarding the Reverse Stock
Split.
After the
completion of the Reverse Stock Split, the Company will have 25,000 authorized
shares of Common Stock, of which approximately
[
l
]
will be issued
and outstanding.
Other
than issuances pursuant to the exercise of outstanding employee stock options,
the Company has no current plans, arrangements or understandings to issue any
Common Stock. However, it reserves the right to do so at any time and
from time to time at such prices and on such other terms and conditions as the
Board determines to be in the best interest of the Company.
The
Reverse Stock Split is not expected to have any material tax consequences for
the Company except that a substantial portion of the transaction expenses may
not be deductible by the Company for federal and state income tax
purposes.
Background
Events
Various
factors during the last five years, principally changes in marketplace
circumstances and a continued contraction in the Company’s business, have
necessitated a re-evaluation of the Company’s manner of doing
business. During this time, the Company implemented a long-term
strategy, which included rebuilding the senior management team, developing new
products, discontinuing non-core products, launching an intensive program of
distributor contact and support, introducing product-pricing programs,
streamlining its asset base, simplifying its technology platforms and generally
reducing overhead in various areas.
During
the current stage of this business consolidation and expansion program, the
Board recognized that a significant number of stockholders owned fewer than
1,000 shares each and that practically no public market exists for the Common
Stock. Further, in that context the Board began to consider whether,
on balance, it was necessary or desirable for the Company to remain a public
company.
The Board
created a Special Transaction Committee, in 2004, to consider and recommend to
the Board as to the advisability, from the Company’s standpoint and that of its
stockholders, of the Company terminating the registration of its stock under the
Exchange Act and becoming a privately held entity. If the Special
Transaction Committee advised in favor of such action, it was further charged to
recommend to the Board a suitable plan to achieve this result.
The
Special Transaction Committee consists of three of the Company’s independent
directors: William J. Howard (Chairman), Erik Hendricks and Pieter
VanBennekom. The remaining directors not appointed to the committee
are C.W. Gilluly, who is an employee of the Company, and Robert J. Lynch, Jr.,
who was formerly an affiliate of the Company.
At
various times over the last several years, the Special Transaction Committee
considered the advisability of the Company’s going private and of achieving this
result through the Reverse Stock Split. It also considered the
appropriate terms of the transaction, including determining a fair cash price
for fractional shares of Common Stock. In February 2010, the Special
Transaction Committee presented the Board with its unanimous recommendation to
implement the Reverse Stock Split. The Special Transaction
Committee’s recommendation of a fair price to be paid in lieu of the issuance of
fractional shares of Common Stock was based on the closing prices of the Common
Stock for the ten trading days preceding the filing of the Preliminary Proxy
Statement with the SEC.
At a
meeting held on February 3, 2010, the Board considered the recommendation of the
Special Transaction Committee, and the Board adopted the recommendations of the
Special Transaction Committee, which comprise the major terms of the Reverse
Stock Split described in this Proxy Statement. The Board adopted
resolutions approving the Reverse Stock Split, but deferred the fixing of a
definitive price to be paid in lieu of the issuance of fractional shares of
Common Stock until the filing of the Preliminary Proxy Statement with the
SEC. The Board approved 1,000-for-1 as an appropriate conversion
ratio for the Reverse Stock Split to result in the Company’s having fewer than
500 stockholders of record immediately following completion of the
transaction. At a meeting held on February 3, 2010, the Board
approved a definitive price of $0.29 per share for fractional
shares.
Detriments
of the Reverse Stock Split
The
Company views the following issues as the main detriments of the Reverse Stock
Split:
|
-
|
The
Company’s working capital or assets will be decreased to fund (i) the cash
payment in lieu of the issuance of fractional shares of Common Stock and
(ii) the costs of the transaction.
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
The
Continuing Stockholders will experience reduced liquidity for their shares
of Common Stock because the shares will no longer be registered with the
SEC or traded on the OTCBB.
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
The
Continuing Stockholders will also experience a reduced equity interest in
the Company and concomitant reduced participation in the Company’s
potential future earnings or growth since most of these stockholders will
receive cash in lieu of fractional shares of Common
Stock.
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
Less
public information about the Company will be available after the Reverse
Stock Split to the Continuing Stockholders because the Company will no
longer be required to file periodic and other reports with the
SEC. Moreover, the executive officers of the Company will have
no further obligation to certify the accuracy of the financial information
of the Company that is made available to the Continuing
Stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
The
Cashed-Out Stockholders will not have an opportunity to sell their shares
at a time and for a price of their choosing and will be unable to
participate in any future earnings or growth of the
Company. However, the Board concluded that the completion of
the Reverse Stock Split will be an overall benefit to the Cashed-Out
Stockholders because of the liquidity provided to them at a fair price and
without transaction costs.
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
The
Company will experience the effective elimination of its already limited
ability to access the public capital markets or to use the Common Stock as
acquisition currency.
|
Interests
of Executive Officers and Directors in the Reverse Stock Split
The
Company’s executive officers and directors own beneficially an aggregate of
4,148,386 shares, or approximately 24%, of Common Stock, including currently
exercisable options to purchase an aggregate of 1,457,800 shares of Common
Stock. Each of these individuals holds shares or vested options
exceeding 1,000 shares and will therefore retain shares of Common Stock or
options to purchase shares of Common Stock immediately following the completion
of the Reverse Stock Split.
See
“Proposal 1 - Beneficial
Ownership of Common Stock.” None of the Company’s executive officers
and directors has indicated to the Company that he or she intends to sell some
or all of his or her shares of the Common Stock during the period between the
public announcement of the Reverse Stock Split and the Effective
Date. Moreover, none of the Company’s executive officers and
directors has indicated his or her intention to divide his or her shares of
Common Stock among different record holders with fewer than 1,000 shares in each
account, so that the record holders, and therefore such directors and officers,
would receive cash in lieu of fractional shares.
As stated, each of the Company’s
executive officers and directors has indicated to the Company his or her
intention to vote all their respective shares of Common Stock in favor of
Proposal No. 2 and the Reverse Stock Split.
As a
result of the Reverse Stock Split, assuming that no transfers described in the
foregoing paragraphs are made, it is expected that the percentage of ownership
of outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company held beneficially by the
Company’s executive officers and directors as a group will increase from
approximately 24% to approximately
[
l
]
% after the
completion of the transaction, based on the number of shares outstanding on
[
l
]
,
2010.
The three
members of the Special Transaction Committee were paid a total of $1,000 in fees
during fiscal 2009 and 2010 for having served on the Special Transaction
Committee. These fees were in addition to director fees and fees for
service on other committees of the Board.
Exchange of Stock
Certificates
Stockholders should not send their
stock certificates to the Company. Stockholders should send them to
the Company’s transfer agent
only
after
they have received
the form of letter of transmittal from the Company. This will be
mailed as soon as practicable after the Reverse Stock Split is
complete.
Promptly
following the completion of the Reverse Stock Split, the Company will send to
all stockholders of record a form of letter of transmittal for use in
transmitting Common Stock certificates to the Company’s transfer
agent. Upon proper completion and execution of a letter of
transmittal and its return to the transfer agent, together with Common Stock
certificates, the stockholder will receive a new Common Stock certificate and/or
cash in the amount to which the holder is entitled as a result of the Reverse
Stock Split. After the completion of the Reverse Stock Split and
until surrendered, each outstanding Common Stock certificate held by a
stockholder of record who held fewer than 1,000 shares of Common Stock prior to
the completion of the Reverse Stock Split will be deemed for all purposes to
represent only the right to receive the amount of cash to which the holder is
entitled to receive pursuant to the Reverse Stock Split.
In connection with the Reverse Stock
Split, the Common Stock will be identified by a new CUSIP number, which will
appear on all newly issued certificates representing shares of Common
Stock. After the Effective Date, each certificate representing shares
of Common Stock that were outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Date
and that were held by a stockholder of record of more than 1,000 shares
immediately prior to the completion of the Reverse Stock Split, until
surrendered and exchanged for a new Common Stock certificate, will be deemed for
all corporate purposes to evidence ownership of 1/1,000
th
of
the number of shares of Common Stock set forth on the face of the Common Stock
certificate, rounded down to the nearest whole share of Common Stock, plus the
right to receive the amount of cash to which the holder is entitled with respect
to holdings not evenly divisible by 1,000 pursuant to the Reverse Stock
Split. Any stockholder desiring to receive a new Common Stock
certificate bearing the new CUSIP number can do so at any time after the
Effective Date in accordance with instructions set forth in the form of letter
of transmittal or otherwise by contacting the Company’s transfer agent as set
forth in the form of letter of transmittal for surrendering his or her old
Common Stock certificates. After the Effective Date, an old Common
Stock certificate presented to the Company’s transfer agent in settlement of a
trade will be exchanged for a new Common Stock certificate bearing the new CUSIP
number.
No service charges or brokerage
commissions will be payable by the Company’s stockholders in connection with the
Reverse Stock Split. The Company will not pay any interest on any
cash amounts payable to its stockholders as a result of the Reverse Stock
Split.
The fractional shares of Common Stock
for which the Company pays cash in the Reverse Stock Split will be adjusted on a
1,000-for-1 basis and such adjusted shares of Common Stock will be cancelled and
thereafter become authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock. The Company’s
repurchase of the fractional shares of Common Stock will be considered a
purchase and retirement of its own Common Stock. The purchase will be
treated as a reduction of stockholders’ equity.
Alternatives
to the Reverse Stock Split
The Board
and the Special Transaction Committee have each concluded that the Reverse Stock
Split is the most expeditious and economical alternative for changing the
Company's status from that of a public reporting company to that of a private
non-reporting company. In making its recommendation to the Board, the
Special Transaction Committee considered the feasibility of various alternative
transactions, and the Board concurred in the Special Transaction Committee’s
determinations.
Issuer
Tender Offer
The
Special Transaction Committee considered recommending that the Company make a
cash tender offer to all the Company’s stockholders with a view to reducing the
number of record stockholders to fewer than 500, but it ultimately determined
the Reverse Stock Split to be preferable. The Special Transaction
Committee believed that an issuer tender offer would not assure a reduction in
the number of record holders to fewer than 500 because many small holders would
not bother tendering their shares of Common Stock. The Special
Transaction Committee further expected the cost of completing the issuer tender
offer to be significant relative to the value of the shares of Common Stock
sought to be purchased by the Company. In addition, an excessive
number of tenders - something the Company could not control - could require the
Company to expend a substantially greater amount of funds than otherwise
necessary to achieve the Company’s objective. Purchasing on a pro
rata basis only a specified portion of the shares of Common Stock tendered by
each stockholder would be an inappropriate solution because this would not
reduce the actual number of record holders. In contrast, the Reverse
Stock Split does not share these uncertainties and has a high probability of
allowing the Company to achieve its objective at a relatively fixed
cost.
Traditional Stock Repurchase
Program
The
Special Transaction Committee considered the advisability of a plan for the
Company periodically to repurchase shares of the Common Stock on the open market
at then current market prices. However, given the limited public
trading activity in the Common Stock and the random self-selection of the
selling stockholders in such transactions, it was thought highly unlikely that
the Company could acquire the entire holdings of a sufficient number of record
holders within any reasonable time frame or assured cost, if at all, to
accomplish a going-private objective.
Odd-Lot
Repurchase Program
The
Special Transaction Committee considered the feasibility of a program by which
the Company would offer to repurchase at a specified price all the shares of
Common Stock held by any stockholder holding of record fewer than 100
shares. However, because stockholder participation would be entirely
voluntary and therefore unpredictable, the Company could not be assured that
enough eligible stockholders would sell their shares of Common Stock so as to
cause the total number of holders of record to be reduced to below
500. Moreover, such a program, especially allowing for likely
extensions of deadlines for responding, would likely entail a more protracted
time frame and greater expense than that of the Reverse Stock
Split.
Merger
or Buy-Out of the Company
The
Company has neither sought nor received any proposals from any persons for the
merger or consolidation of the Company, or for the sale or other transfer of all
or substantially all of the Company's assets, or for the issuance of securities
of the Company that would enable the holder thereof to exercise control of the
Company. The Company did not seek any such proposals because such
transactions are inconsistent with the purpose of the proposed transaction,
which is the continued operation of the Company as a privately-held company for
the benefit of its current stockholders. The Special Transaction
Committee believed that implementation of the Reverse Stock Split would enable
management to devote full time and attention to the Company's business and
result in a significant reduction in the Company’s expenses. This is
expected, in turn, to enable the Company to improve its financial performance,
which could result in increased shareholder value over time. The
Special Transaction Committee was also concerned that exploring the sale of the
Company could create an unstable environment for various employees whose
commitment is critical key to the Company's operations, thus potentially
disrupting and adversely affecting the Company's business and
operations.
Maintaining
the Status Quo
The
Special Transaction Committee considered maintaining the status quo, in which
case the Company would continue to incur the expenses of being a publicly
reporting company without enjoying the benefits typically associated with
public-company status. The Special Transaction Committee considered
this alternative to be detrimental to the continued future success of the
Company, and therefore to all of the Company’s stockholders, and accordingly
determined that it was not in the best interest of the Company and its
stockholders and rejected it.
Proposed
Language Amending the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation Regarding the
Reverse Stock Split
The
following is the text of a new paragraph in Article FOURTH of the Company’s
Certificate of Incorporation substantially as it is proposed to be amended by
filing a Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation with the
Delaware Secretary of State to effect the Reverse Stock Split
:
"Effective
at 11:59 p.m., Delaware time, on the date of filing of this Certificate of
Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of
Delaware (the "Effective Time"), each 1,000 shares of Common Stock of the
Corporation then issued and outstanding will be automatically reclassified as
and changed into one share of Common Stock, without any change to par value
(such transaction, the "Reverse Stock Split"). If immediately prior
to the Reverse Stock Split a stockholder holds less than 1,000 shares of Common
Stock or a number of shares of Common Stock that is not evenly divisible by
1,000, the Corporation will make a cash payment at the rate of $0.29
(the
"Purchase Price") for each fractional share of Common Stock immediately
following the completion of the Reverse Stock Split. Upon completion
of the Reverse Stock Split:
(i) each
stockholder of record holding less than 1,000 shares of Common Stock immediately
prior to the completion of the Reverse Stock Split will have only the right to
receive cash based upon the Purchase Price, and the equity interest of each such
stockholder in the Corporation will be terminated and shall no longer confer on
such stockholder any further right to vote as a stockholder or share in the
Corporation's assets, earnings or profits following the completion of the
Reverse Stock Split; and
(ii) each
such stockholder of record holding 1,000 or more shares of Common Stock
immediately prior to the completion of the Reverse Stock Split shall be entitled
to receive, upon the surrender of the certificate or certificates representing
the shares of Common Stock, at the office of the transfer agent of the
Corporation in such form and accompanied by such documents, if any, as may be
prescribed by such transfer agent, a new certificate or certificates
representing the number of shares of Common Stock of which he or she is the
record owner after giving effect to the provisions of this Article
FOURTH.”
The total
number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company shall have the
authority to issue is thirty thousand (30,000) consisting of:
|
1.
|
Five
thousand (5,000) shares of Preferred Stock, par value one cent ($.01) per
share (the “Preferred Stock”); and
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Twenty
five thousand (25,000) shares of Common Stock, par value one cent ($.01)
per share (the “Common Stock”).
|
Federal
Income Tax Consequences
A summary of the federal income tax
consequences of the Reverse Stock Split is set forth below. The
discussion is based on present federal income tax law. The discussion
is not, and should not be relied on as, a comprehensive analysis of the tax
issues arising from or relating to the transaction. This summary does
not purport to deal with all aspects of federal income taxation that may be
relevant to a particular stockholder of the Company in light of such
stockholder's personal investment circumstances or to certain types of
stockholders subject to special treatment under the IRC (including, financial
institutions, broker-dealers, regulated investment companies, life insurance
companies, tax-exempt organizations, foreign corporations and non-resident
aliens).
Stockholders are urged to consult
their personal tax advisors for an analysis of the effect of the Reverse Stock
Split based on their own tax situations, including consequences under applicable
state, local or foreign tax laws.
The Company believes that the receipt
of cash for a fractional share of Common Stock will be deemed a sale of the
fractional share for income tax purposes and that the gain or loss to be
recognized will be the difference between the amount of cash received for the
fractional share and the stockholder's tax basis in such fractional
share. The gain or loss will generally be a short term or long term
capital gain or loss, depending on the length of time the share of Common Stock
was held.
The
Company believes the combination of shares of Common Stock in the Reverse Stock
Split will qualify as a recapitalization under Section 368 of the IRC to the
extent that outstanding shares of existing Common Stock are combined into a
reduced number of shares of Common Stock. Therefore, the combination
of shares into fewer shares of Common Stock will result in neither the Company
nor its stockholders recognizing any gain or loss for federal income tax
purposes.
The
shares of Common Stock to be issued to each Continuing Stockholder in the
Reverse Stock Split will have an aggregate basis, for computing gain or loss,
equal to the aggregate basis of the shares of existing Common Stock held by such
stockholder immediately prior to the completion of the Reverse Stock Split,
less
the basis of any
fractional shares for which he or she receives cash. A stockholder's
holding period for the shares of Common Stock will include the holding period
prior to the Effective Date; provided, that such outstanding shares of existing
Common Stock were held by the stockholder as a capital asset on the Effective
Date.
Stockholders
will be required to provide their Social Security or other taxpayer
identification numbers (or in some instances additional information) to the
Company’s transfer agent in connection with the Reverse Stock Split to avoid
backup withholding requirements that might otherwise apply. The form
of letter of transmittal will require each stockholder to deliver this
information when he or she surrenders the Common Stock certificates following
the Effective Date. Failure to provide this information may result in
backup withholding.
No
Dissenters’ Rights
Stockholders
who dissent from the Reverse Stock Split will have no appraisal rights under
Delaware law or under the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation or
By-Laws. There may exist other rights or actions under state law for
stockholders who can demonstrate that they have been damaged by the Reverse
Stock Split. Although the nature and extent of such rights or actions
are uncertain and may vary depending upon facts or circumstances, stockholder
challenges to corporate actions in general are related to the fiduciary
responsibilities of corporate officers and directors and to the fairness of
corporate transactions.
Conduct
of the Company’s Business after the Reverse Stock Split
The
Company expects the Reverse Stock Split not to have any effect upon its business
or operations, which are anticipated to continue as currently conducted except
as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. The Company expects to realize
time and cost savings as a result of terminating its public company
status.
The
Company plans, as a result of the Reverse Stock Split, to become a privately
held company. As stated throughout this Proxy Statement, the Company
believes that there are significant advantages in going private and the Company
plans to avail itself of any opportunities it may have as a private company,
including improving its ability to compete in the marketplace, making itself a
more viable candidate with respect to a merger or acquisition transaction with
any one of its competitors or entering into a joint venture or other
arrangement. Although the Company currently is not pursuing any
negotiations with respect to any transaction, the Company may enter into an
arrangement at any time in the future.
The
Company does not have any current plans or proposals to effect any extraordinary
corporate transaction, such as a merger, reorganization or liquidation; to sell
or transfer any material amount of its assets; to change its Board or
management; to change materially its indebtedness or capitalization; or
otherwise to effect any material change in its corporate structure or
business. There are no plans to change any material term of any
severance agreement or retention bonus plan agreement with any of the Company's
executive officers. However, the Company may engage in such a
transaction in the future to the extent that management and the Board determine
it to be in the interest of the Company and its stockholders.
PRICE
RANGE OF COMMON STOCK; DIVIDENDS; TRADING VOLUME
The
Common Stock is traded on the OTCBB. The range of high and low bid
quotations for the Common Stock, as reported on the OTCBB, for each quarterly
period during fiscal years 2009 and 2008 is shown below:
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
First
Quarter (7/1/08 to 9/30/08)
|
0.32
|
|
0.16
|
Second
Quarter (10/1/08 to 12/31/08)
|
0.21
|
|
0.06
|
Third
Quarter (1/1/09 to 3/31/09)
|
0.08
|
|
0.05
|
Fourth
Quarter (4/1/09 to 6/30/09)
|
0.12
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, 2008
|
First
Quarter (7/1/07 to 9/30/07)
|
0.25
|
|
0.18
|
Second
Quarter (10/1/07 to 12/31/07)
|
0.24
|
|
0.18
|
Third
Quarter (1/1 /08to 3/31/08)
|
0.25
|
|
0.17
|
Fourth
Quarter (4/1/08 to 6/30/08)
|
0.35
|
|
0.17
|
As of
February 4, 2010, there were 15,794,200 shares of Common Stock outstanding, held
by approximately 459 holders of record.
The
Company has neither declared nor paid a cash dividend to date, nor does it
anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future.
The
average closing price of the Common Stock for the ten days ended February 4,
2010 was $0.23. The average daily trading volume during the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2009 was approximately 7,600 shares of Common
Stock; and the average daily volume during the ten trading days ended February
4, 2010 was 6,400 shares of Common Stock.
Recommendation
of the Board;
Fairness
of the Transaction
The Board
and the Special Transaction Committee each unanimously approved the amendments
to the Certificate of Incorporation and believe the Reverse Stock Split, taken
as a whole, is in the best interest of the Company and is substantively and
procedurally fair to both the Cashed-Out Stockholders and the Continuing
Stockholders.
AMENDMENT
OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO PERMIT ACTIONS OF THE COMPANY’S STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE TAKEN BY WRITTEN CONSENT
Purpose
of and Reasons for the Proposed Amendment
The
Company’s Certificate of Incorporation currently requires that any action
required or permitted to be taken by the stockholders of the Company must be
effected at a duly called annual or special meeting of stockholders and may not
be effected by any written consent by such stockholders. The
Company’s By-Laws contain similar restrictions. The Company’s
Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws relating to this provision are more
restrictive than Delaware law generally allow for companies incorporated
therein. Specifically, Delaware law allows for actions to be taken by
stockholders by written consent if certain procedures are
followed. The Company believes that amending its Certificate of
Incorporation to allow for actions of the Company’s stockholders to be taken by
written consent to the extent authorized by Delaware law would allow it
increased flexibility to act on corporate matters as events warrant,
particularly following the Reverse Stock Split.
Proposed
Language Amending the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to Permit Actions
of the Company’s Stockholders to be Taken by Written Consent
The
following is the text of a new paragraph in Article FIFTH, Section C of the
Company’s Certificate of Incorporation substantially as it is proposed to be
amended by the Certificate of Amendment
:
ARTICLE
FIFTH, SECTION C:
Subject
to the rights of any class or series of Preferred Stock of the Corporation, any
action required or permitted to be taken by the stockholders of the Corporation
may be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting of stockholders of
the Corporation or by any consent in writing by such stockholders as authorized
by Delaware law.
The Board
of the Company will amend the Company’s By-Laws to provide for stockholder
action by written consent only if this amendment to the Certificate of
Incorporation is approved by stockholders.
THE
BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL AND
ADOPTION
OF THE AMENDMENTS TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION.
PROPOSAL
NO. 3
RATIFICATION
OF APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS
The Board
has appointed the firm of Turner, Stone & Co., LLP as the Company’s
independent auditors for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010. The
Board believes it is appropriate to seek stockholder ratification of this
appointment in light of the critical role played by independent auditors in
maintaining the integrity of Company’s financial controls and
reporting.
A
representative of Turner, Stone & Co., LLP is expected to attend the Special
Meeting. The representative will have the opportunity to make a
statement, if he or she so desires, and will be available to respond to
appropriate questions from stockholders.
The following table sets forth the
aggregate fees billed to the Company by Turner, Stone & Co., LLP for the
fiscal years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
Fiscal
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit
Fees
|
|
$
|
59,340
|
|
|
$
|
90,000
|
|
Audit
Related Fees
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
All
Other Fees
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Tax
Fees
|
|
|
5,414
|
|
|
|
5,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Fees
|
|
$
|
64,754
|
|
|
$
|
95,788
|
|
Vote
Not Required; Recommendation of the Board
Although not required to be
submitted to stockholders for approval, the Board believes it is appropriate to
seek stockholder ratification of this appointment.
The Audit
Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services, which
relate primarily to tax consulting services rendered, is compatible with
maintaining the independence of Turner, Stone & Co, LLP. The Audit
Committee concluded that performing such services does not affect the
independence of Turner, Stone & Co., LLP in performing its function as the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.
The Audit
Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided
by the independent registered public accounting firm, either by approving an
engagement prior to the engagement or pursuant to a pre-approval policy with
respect to particular services. These services may include audit
services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. The
Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority to the Chairman of the
Audit Committee when expedition of services is necessary. The independent
registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically
report to the full Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by
the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with this
pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. All
audit-related fees, tax fees and all other fees described above were approved
either as part of the Company’s engagement of Turner, Stone & Co., LLP or
pursuant to the pre-approval policy described above.
In order
to ratify the appointment of Turner, Stone & Co., LLP as the independent
registered public accounting firm of the Company for the year ending June 30,
2010, the proposal must receive at least a majority of the votes represented at
the annual meeting, without regard to broker non-votes, in favor of such
ratification. The Audit Committee of the Board recommends a vote “FOR” the
ratification of Turner, Stone & Co., LLP as the independent registered
public accounting firm for the year ended June 30, 2010.
THE
BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION
OF
THE
APPOINTMENT OF TURNER, STONE & CO., LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR
THE
COMPANY
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010.
OTHER INFORMATION
Incorporation by
Reference
Certain
of the Company’s filings with the SEC are incorporated herein by reference. This
means that the Company is referring its stockholders to information that it has
filed separately with the SEC. The information incorporated by
reference should be considered part of this Proxy Statement, except for any
information superseded by information contained directly in this Proxy
Statement.
This
Proxy Statement is accompanied by and incorporates by reference the following
documents, which the Company has previously filed with the SEC and which contain
important information about Company and its financial condition:
|
●
|
The
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
Company’s Schedule 13E-3
|
Also
incorporated by reference are any additional documents that the Company may file
with the SEC under Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act
between the date of this Proxy Statement and the date of the Special
Meeting. The Company will provide, without charge, to each person to
whom this Proxy Statement is delivered, upon written or oral request of such
person and by first class mail or other equally prompt means within one business
day of receipt of such request, a copy of any and all such additional
documents. You may obtain a copy of these documents and any
amendments thereto by writing to Corporate Secretary, Comtrex News Network,
Inc., 625 N. Washington St., Alexandria, VA 22314.
All
documents incorporated by reference are also included in the Company’s filings
with the SEC, which you can access electronically at the SEC’s website at
http://www.sec.gov
.
This
Proxy Statement is delivered to you as part of the information materials for the
Special Meeting. This Proxy Statement does not constitute an offer to
purchase or sale of the Common Stock.
Where You Can Find More
Information
The
Reverse Stock Split will constitute a “going private” transaction subject to
Rule 13e-3 of the Exchange Act. The Company has filed a
Rule 13e-3 Transaction Statement on Schedule 13E-3 under the Exchange
Act with respect to the Reverse Stock Split. The Schedule 13E-3
contains additional information about the Company. Copies of the
Schedule 13E-3 are available for inspection and copying at the principal
executive offices of the Company during regular business hours by any interested
stockholder of the Company, or a representative who has been so designated in
writing, and may be inspected and copied, or obtained by mail, by written
request directed to Corporate Secretary, Comtex News Network, Inc., 625 N.
Washington St., Alexandria, VA 22314.
The
Company is currently subject to the information requirements of the Exchange Act
and files periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC
relating to its business, financial and other matters. Such reports,
proxy statements and other information, as well as the Schedule 13E-3, may
be copied (at prescribed rates) at the public reference facilities maintained by
the SEC at Room 1024, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Judiciary Plaza, Washington,
D.C. 20549. For further information concerning the SEC’s public
reference rooms, you may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. This information may
also be accessed on the Internet at the SEC’s Website,
http://www.sec.gov
.
The
Common Stock is listed on the OTCBB under the ticker symbol “CMTX.”
STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS
The
Company’s By-Laws treat annual meetings and special meetings differently with
respect to stockholder proposals.
Special
Meetings
Generally,
only such business shall be conducted at a special meeting of stockholders as
shall have been brought before the meeting pursuant to the Company’s notice of
meeting. However, nominations of persons for election to the Board
may be made at a special meeting of stockholders at which directors are to be
elected pursuant to the Company’s notice of meeting (a) by or at the direction
of the Board or (b) by any stockholder of record of the Company who is a
stockholder of record at the time of giving of notice provided for in this
paragraph, who shall be entitled to vote at the meeting and who complies with
the notice procedures set forth below under “—Annual
Meetings.” Nominations by stockholders of persons for election to the
Board may be made at such a special meeting of stockholders if the stockholder’s
notice described below under “—Annual Meetings” is delivered to the Secretary at
the principal executive offices of the Company not later than the close of
business on the later of the 90
th
day
prior to such special meeting or the 10
th
day
following the day on which public announcement is first made of the date of the
special meeting and of the nominees proposed by the Board to be elected as such
meeting.
Annual
Meetings
For
nominations or other business to be properly brought before an annual meeting by
a stockholder, (a) the stockholder must have given timely notice thereof in
writing to the Secretary of the Company, (b) such business must be a proper
matter for stockholder action under Delaware law, (c) if the stockholder, or the
beneficial owner on whose behalf any such proposal or nomination is made, has
provided the Company with a Solicitation Notice, such stockholder or beneficial
owner must, in the case of a proposal, have delivered a proxy statement and form
of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of the Company’s voting shares
required under applicable law to carry any such proposal, or, in the case of a
nomination or nominations, have delivered a proxy statement and form of proxy to
holders of a percentage of the Company’s voting shares reasonably believed by
such stockholder or beneficial holder to be sufficient to elect the nominee or
nominees proposed to be nominated by such stockholder, and must, in either case,
have included in such materials the Solicitation Notice, and (d) if no
Solicitation Notice relating thereto has been timely provided pursuant to this
section, the stockholder or beneficial owner proposing such business or
nomination must not have solicited a number of proxies sufficient to have
required the delivery of such a Solicitation Notice under this
section.
To be
timely, a stockholder’s notice shall be delivered to the Secretary at the
principal executive offices of the Company not less than 90 days prior to the
date of the Company’s proxy materials for the preceding year’s annual meeting of
stockholders (“Proxy Statement Date”);
provided
,
that
if the date of
the annual meeting is advanced more than 30 days prior to or delayed by more
than 30 days after the anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting,
notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so delivered not later than the
close of business on the 10
th
day
following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is
first made.
Such
stockholder’s notice shall set forth: (a) as to each person whom the stockholder
proposes to nominate for election or reelection as a director all information
relating to such person as would be required to be disclosed in solicitations of
proxies for the election of such nominees as directors pursuant to Regulation
14A under the Exchange Act, and such person’s written consent to serve as a
director if elected; (b) as to any other business that the stockholder proposes
to bring before the meeting, a brief description of such business, the reasons
for conducting such business at the meeting and any material interest in such
business of such stockholder and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf
the proposal is made; and (c) as to the stockholder giving the notice and the
beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made (i)
the name and address of such stockholder, as they appear on the Company’s books,
and of such beneficial owner, (ii) the class and number of shares of the Company
that are owned beneficially and of record by such stockholder and such
beneficial owner, and (iii) a Solicitation Notice. A “Solicitation
Notice” is an affirmative statement as to whether either such stockholder or
beneficial owner intends to deliver a proxy statement and form of proxy to
holders if, in the case of a proposal, at least the percentage of the Company’s
voting shares required under applicable law to carry the proposal or, in the
case of a nomination or nominations, a sufficient number of holders of the
Company’s voting shares to elect such nominee or nominees.
OTHER
MATTERS
The Board knows of no other business
to be acted upon at the Special Meeting other than the matters referred to in
this Proxy Statement.
|
By
Order of the Board of Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.
Amber Gordon
|
|
|
Corporate
Secretary
|
|
Date:
[Date]
,
2010