The “Neuberger Berman” name and logo and “Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC” name are
registered service marks of Neuberger Berman Group LLC. The individual Fund name in this piece is either a service mark or registered service mark of Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC. ©2022 Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC. All
rights reserved.
I am pleased to present the annual report for Neuberger Berman MLP and Energy Income Fund Inc. (NYSE American: NML) (the Fund) for the 12 months ended November 30, 2022 (the reporting
period). The report includes a portfolio commentary, a listing of the Fund’s investments, and its audited financial statements for the reporting period.
The Fund seeks to provide total return with an emphasis on cash distributions. The Fund remains committed to its investment strategy, which is based on analysis of high-quality master limited
partnerships and energy companies with an emphasis on the midstream natural resources sector.
During the reporting period, the Fund announced four increases to its monthly distribution rate. At the beginning of the reporting period, the Fund’s monthly distribution rate was $0.0163 per
share of common stock. As previously communicated, the Fund increased its monthly distribution rate in January 2022, March 2022, July 2022 and, most recently, in November 2022, when the Fund announced an increase in its monthly distribution rate
to $0.0584 per share of common stock, representing an increase of approximately 157% from the prior monthly distribution rate of $0.02266 per share of common stock. This recent distribution increase also represented the seventh increase in the
Fund’s distribution rate since June 2020 and an overall increase of approximately 400% in the Fund’s monthly distribution rate over that time period. Neuberger Berman and the Fund’s Board of Directors continue to closely monitor market conditions
and the Fund’s ability to generate distributable cash flow, and will continue to consider strategies or transactions that may mitigate the discount that the Fund’s common stock trades relative to its net asset value.
Thank you for your confidence in the Fund. We will continue to do our best to retain your trust in the years to come.
Joseph V. Amato
Neuberger Berman MLP and Energy Income Fund Inc.
Neuberger Berman MLP and Energy Income Fund Inc. (the Fund) produced a 43.39% total return on a net asset value (NAV) basis for the 12 months ended November 30, 2022 (the reporting period),
outperforming its benchmark, the Alerian MLP Index (the Index), which posted a 42.25% total return for the same period. The use of leverage (typically a performance enhancer in up markets and a detractor during market retreats) contributed
positively to the Fund’s performance during the reporting period. (Fund performance on a market price basis is provided in the table immediately following this commentary.)
The Energy sector as a whole delivered excellent albeit volatile performance during the reporting period. It was marked by macro events such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February,
historically high levels of global inflation, the continued reopening of global economies following the pandemic, and the passage of legislation (the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022) which we anticipate will have a long-term impact on energy
markets.
In February 2022, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine resulted in widespread sanctions on Russian oil and natural gas. Energy prices surged as the world feared global energy shortages. In response, the
United States agreed to supply Europe with an increased amount of liquefied natural gas (LNG) through 2030—a boon to the United States and its energy industry. We believe that this additional demand should support rising U.S. natural gas
production and a further buildout of LNG export facilities.
In addition to Europe increasingly viewing LNG as both a decarbonization tool as well as a national security imperative, demand from Asia is increasing. LNG exporting is relatively new for the
United States, only taking off in earnest over the last five years. Yet the U.S. has become a top LNG exporting country. We believe this will likely benefit the Fund’s midstream holdings, which provide the infrastructure needed to transport LNG.
While demand for LNG surges, support for investment in renewable energy remains strong. In August, the Inflation Reduction Act (the Act) passed, with a focus on supporting domestic energy
production and security. The Act provides extensions for solar and wind tax credits to promote clean energy production, which we believe are positive for some of the Fund’s holdings. The Act also provides incentives for much-needed investment in
upgrading the electrical grid, which could potentially benefit select utility holdings in the Fund. There are also several important ancillary provisions in the Act that may help to streamline the pipeline permitting process, which may also
benefit some Fund holdings.
Another driver, we believe, of midstream equities’ outperformance during the reporting period was the resumption of meaningful distribution growth. Improvements in balance sheets and the continued
building of cash flow coverage in relation to distribution payments has provided support to both sustain and begin growing distribution payouts in certain cases. We view the increases in distribution payments to investors as a testament to the
strength in the long-term fundamentals of these businesses.
Despite the threat of an economic recession, we believe the Energy sector could provide solid investment opportunities over the next several years. While the war in Ukraine initially put immediate
upward pressure on commodity and energy stock prices, we believe these higher commodity and stock prices may be maintained, in part, as we continue to observe large public energy companies employ steady discipline on capital allocation and
prioritize the return of free cash flow to investors over growth in exploration and production. This focus may improve shareholder returns, limit production, and put upward pressure on commodity prices. We believe the transition to cleaner energy
consumption will take place over the coming decades; however, this may take longer than many expect. Therefore, all sources of energy must be tapped. Robust consumption combined with limited supply growth could help sustain a higher price
environment, potentially allowing energy companies to improve margins. Further, we believe lower capital expenditures and a higher free cash flow profile may enable energy companies to return higher levels of capital in the form of increasing
distributions and share buybacks. We believe the Fund’s mix of high-quality midstream companies, renewable yield companies, and select utilities are well positioned to participate in these long-term trends.
The portfolio composition, industries and holdings of the Fund are subject to change without notice.
The opinions expressed are those of the Fund’s portfolio managers. The opinions are as of the date of this report and are subject to change without notice.
The value of securities owned by the Fund, as well as the market value of shares of the Fund’s common stock, may decline in response to certain events, including those directly involving the issuers
whose securities are owned by the Fund; conditions affecting the general economy; overall market changes; local, regional, national or global political, social or economic instability; regulatory or legislative developments; price, currency and
interest rate fluctuations, including those resulting from changes in central bank policies; and changes in investor sentiment.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Neuberger Berman MLP and Energy Income Fund Inc. (the “Fund”), including the schedule of
investments, as of November 30, 2022 and the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, the financial highlights for each
of the five years in the period then ended and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund at
November 30, 2022, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and its financial highlights for each of the five years in the period
then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Fund’s financial statements based on
our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Fund in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws
and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. As part of
our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we
express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing
procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of November 30,
2022, by correspondence with the custodian. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe
that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have served as the auditor of one or more Neuberger Berman investment companies since 1954.
Boston, Massachusetts
January 27, 2023
22
Table of Contents
Fund Investment Objective, Policies and Risks
Investment Objective and Policies
The Fund’s investment objective is to seek total return with an emphasis on cash distributions. There is no assurance that the Fund will achieve its investment objective.
Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests at least 80% of its total assets in master limited partnerships (“MLPs”) or energy companies (the “80% policy”). For purposes of the 80%
policy, the Fund’s MLP investments may include, but are not limited to, MLPs structured as limited partnerships (“LPs”) or limited liability companies (“LLCs”); MLPs that are organized as LPs or LLCs, but taxed as “C” corporations; equity
securities that represent an indirect interest in an MLP issued by an MLP affiliate, including institutional units and MLP general partner (“GP”) or managing member interests; “C” corporations whose predominant assets are interests in MLPs; MLP
equity securities, including MLP common units, MLP subordinated units, MLP convertible subordinated units and MLP preferred units; private investments in public equities issued by MLPs; MLP debt securities; and other U.S. and non-U.S. equity
and fixed income securities and derivative instruments that provide exposure to the MLP market, including pooled investment vehicles that primarily hold MLP interests and exchange-traded notes. Under the 80% policy, the Fund’s energy
investments other than MLPs may include equity and fixed income securities of U.S. and non-U.S. companies that (i) operate within the oil and gas storage, transportation, refining, marketing, equipment and services, drilling, exploration or
production sub-industries or (ii) have at least 50% of their assets, income, sales or profits committed to, or derived from, the exploration, development, production, gathering, transportation (including marine), transmission, terminal
operation, processing, storage, refining, distribution, mining or marketing of natural gas, natural gas liquids (including propane), crude oil, refined petroleum products, electricity or other energy sources, including renewable energy,
energy-related equipment or services. The Fund is non-diversified under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), and thus may invest a greater percentage of its assets in a single issuer than a diversified fund. The
Fund’s investment objective and 80% policy are not fundamental and may be changed by the Fund’s Board of Directors without stockholder approval, however stockholders would be provided at least 60 days’ notice of any changes.
The Fund may invest up to 20% of its total assets in income-producing securities of non-MLP or energy-related issuers, such as common and preferred equity securities. The Fund may also
invest in securities and other instruments issued by U.S. and Canadian income and royalty trusts and other issuers.
The Fund’s investments in MLPs are expected to emphasize companies that the portfolio managers believe have growth potential and operate in the midstream natural resources sector. These MLPs
are anticipated to have 1) stable and reliable cash flows, 2) low correlation to commodity prices, and 3) multi-year contracts that charge flat fees to produce steady payments. Companies that are primarily engaged in activities such as the
transportation, storage, gathering and processing of natural resources are generally referred to as midstream MLPs. While the Fund expects to emphasize midstream MLP investments, the Fund may invest in other sectors of the natural resources
industry (including companies engaged in “upstream” or “downstream” production activities) or in non-energy securities. Furthermore, the Fund may selectively invest in non-MLP long positions in companies involved in any aspect of the natural
resources industry. The natural resources industry includes companies involved in: exploration and production, refining and marketing, oilfield service, drilling, integrated natural gas midstream services, transportation and storage, shipping,
electricity generation and distribution and renewable resources.
In pursuing the Fund’s investment objective, the portfolio managers intend to focus on midstream MLP investments and energy companies that they believe have the ability to provide attractive
total return and cash distributions. In doing so, the portfolio managers expect to emphasize securities that they believe have an attractive risk/return profile and low correlation to interest rate fluctuations.
23
Table of Contents
Because of its concentration in MLP investments, the Fund is not eligible to be a regulated investment company under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Accordingly, the Fund is
treated as a taxable regular corporation, or so-called “C” corporation, for federal tax purposes. As a result, the Fund is subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at the graduated rates applicable to corporations (currently at a
maximum rate of 21%) as well as state and local income taxes. The investment strategy of investing a substantial portion of its total assets in MLPs—and thus being treated as a “C” corporation, rather than as a regulated investment company, for
federal income tax purposes—involves complicated and in some cases unsettled accounting, tax and net asset and share valuation aspects that cause the Fund to differ significantly from most other closed-end registered investment companies. This
may result in unexpected and potentially significant accounting, tax and valuation consequences for the Fund and for its common stockholders. In addition, accounting, tax and valuation practices in this area are still developing, and there may
not always be a clear consensus among industry participants as to the most appropriate approach. This may result in changes over time in the practices applied by the Fund, which, in turn, could have material adverse consequences on the Fund and
its common stockholders.
The Fund uses leverage to pursue its investment objective. The Fund currently utilizes leverage through a secured credit facility, and may borrow money or use a variety of additional
strategies to increase funds available for investment. Under the 1940 Act, the Fund is permitted to issue debt up to 33 1/3% of its total managed assets or equity securities (e.g., preferred shares) up to 50% of its total managed assets. The
Fund may voluntarily elect to limit its leverage to less than the maximum amount permitted under the 1940 Act.
Risk Factors
This section contains a discussion of principal risks of investing in the Fund. The net asset value per share (“NAV”) and market price of, and distributions paid on, the Fund’s shares of
common stock will fluctuate with and be affected by, among other things, the risks more fully described below. As with any fund, there can be no guarantee that the Fund will meet its investment objective or that the Fund’s performance will be
positive for any period of time. Each of the following risks, which are described in alphabetical order and not in order of importance, can significantly affect the Fund’s performance. The relative importance of, or potential exposure as a
result of, each of these risks will vary based on market and other investment-specific considerations. The Fund may be subject to other risks in addition to those identified below.
Anti-Takeover and Other Provisions in the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. The Fund’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws include provisions that could limit the ability of
other entities or persons to acquire control of the Fund, to cause it to engage in certain transactions or to modify its structure. Such provisions may limit the ability of common stockholders to sell their shares at a premium over the
then-current market prices and may have the effect of inhibiting structural changes to the Fund, such as a conversion to an open-end investment company.
Call Risk. Upon the issuer’s desire to call a security, or under other circumstances where a security is called, including when interest rates are low and issuers opt to repay the
obligation underlying a “callable security” early, the Fund may have to reinvest the proceeds in an investment offering a lower yield and may not benefit from any increase in value that might otherwise result from declining interest rates.
Credit Risk. Credit risk is the risk that issuers, guarantors, or insurers may fail, or become less able or unwilling, to pay interest and/or principal when due. Changes in the actual
or perceived creditworthiness of an issuer or a downgrade or default affecting any of the Fund’s securities could affect the Fund’s performance by affecting the credit quality or value of the Fund’s securities. Generally, the longer the
maturity and the lower the credit quality of a security, the more sensitive it is to credit risk.
Dividend Risk. There is no guarantee that the companies in which the Fund invests will declare dividends in the future or that dividends, if declared, will remain at current levels or
increase over time. Securities that pay dividends may be sensitive to changes in interest rates, and as interest rates rise or fall, the prices of such securities may fall.
24
Table of Contents
Energy Sector Risk. The Fund concentrates its investments in the energy sector, and will therefore be susceptible to adverse economic, business, social, political, environmental,
regulatory or other developments affecting that sector. The energy sector has historically experienced substantial price volatility. MLPs, energy infrastructure companies and other companies operating in the energy sector are subject to
specific risks, including, among others: fluctuations in commodity prices and/or interest rates; increased governmental or environmental regulation; reduced availability of natural gas or other commodities for transporting, processing, storing
or delivering; declines in domestic or foreign production; slowdowns in new construction; extreme weather or other natural disasters; and threats of attack by terrorists on energy assets. Energy companies can be significantly affected by the
supply of, and demand for, particular energy products (such as oil and natural gas), which may result in overproduction or underproduction. Additionally, changes in the regulatory environment for energy companies may adversely impact their
profitability. Over time, depletion of natural gas reserves and other energy reserves may also affect the profitability of energy companies.
During periods of heightened volatility, energy producers that are burdened with debt may seek bankruptcy relief. Bankruptcy laws may permit the revocation or renegotiation of contracts
between energy producers and MLPs/energy infrastructure companies, which could have a dramatic impact on the ability of MLPs/energy infrastructure companies to pay distributions to its investors, including the Fund, which in turn could impact
the ability of the Fund to pay distributions and dramatically impact the value of the Fund’s investments.
Interest Rate Risk. The Fund’s distribution rate and NAV will fluctuate in response to changes in interest rates. In general, the value of investments with interest rate risk, such as
debt securities, will move in the direction opposite to movements in interest rates. If interest rates rise, the value of such securities may decline. Typically, the longer the maturity or duration of a debt security, the greater the effect a
change in interest rates could have on the security’s price. Thus, the sensitivity of the Fund’s debt securities to interest rate risk will increase with any increase in the duration of those securities.
Issuer-Specific Risk. An individual security may be more volatile, and may perform differently, than the market as a whole. The Fund’s portfolio may contain fewer securities than the
portfolios of other funds, which increases the risk that the value of the Fund could go down because of the poor performance of one or a few investments.
Leverage Risk. The Fund’s use of leverage may cause higher volatility for the Fund’s NAV, market price, and distribution rate. Leverage typically magnifies the total return of the
Fund’s portfolio, whether that return is positive or negative. Leverage is intended to increase common stock net income, but there is no assurance that the Fund’s leveraging strategy will be successful or that the use of leverage will result in
a higher yield on the Fund’s shares of common stock. Leverage may also increase the Fund’s liquidity risk, as the Fund may need to sell securities at inopportune times to stay within Fund, contractual or regulatory limits. The Fund’s use of
leverage may increase operating costs, which may reduce total return. The Fund’s use of leverage may increase or decrease from time to time in its discretion and the Fund may, in the future, determine not to use leverage.
Liquidity Risk. From time to time, the trading market for a particular investment in which the Fund invests, or a particular type of instrument in which the Fund is invested, may
become less liquid or even illiquid. Illiquid investments frequently can be more difficult to purchase or sell at an advantageous price or time, and there is a greater risk that the investments may not be sold for the price at which the Fund is
carrying them. Certain investments that were liquid when the Fund purchased them may become illiquid, sometimes abruptly. Additionally, market closures due to holidays or other factors may render a security or group of securities (e.g.,
securities tied to a particular country or geographic region) illiquid for a period of time. An inability to sell a portfolio position can adversely affect the Fund’s value or prevent the Fund from being able to take advantage of other
investment opportunities. Market prices for such securities or other investments may be volatile. During periods of substantial market volatility, an investment or even an entire market segment may become illiquid, sometimes abruptly, which can
adversely affect the Fund’s ability to limit losses.
25
Table of Contents
Market Premium/Discount Risk. The market price of the Fund’s shares of common stock will generally fluctuate in accordance with changes in the Fund’s NAV as well as the relative
supply of and demand for shares on the secondary market. The Fund’s investment advisor cannot predict whether shares will trade below, at or above their NAV because the shares trade on the secondary market at market prices and not at NAV.
Because the market price of the Fund’s shares of common stock will be determined by factors such as relative supply of and demand for the Fund’s common stock in the market, general market and economic circumstances, and other factors beyond the
control of the Fund, the Fund cannot predict whether its shares of common stock will trade at, below or above NAV. This characteristic is a risk separate and distinct from the risk that the Fund’s NAV could decrease as a result of investment
activities. Common stockholders bear a risk of loss to the extent that the price at which they sell their shares is lower than at the time of purchase.
Market Volatility Risk. Markets may be volatile and values of individual securities and other investments, including those of a particular type, may decline significantly in response
to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, economic or other developments that may cause broad changes in market value, public perceptions concerning these developments, and adverse investor sentiment or publicity. Geopolitical and other
risks, including environmental and public health risks may add to instability in world economies and markets generally. Changes in value may be temporary or may last for extended periods. If the Fund sells a portfolio position before it reaches
its market peak, it may miss out on opportunities for better performance.
Master Limited Partnership Risk. Investing in MLPs involves certain risks related to investing in the underlying assets of the MLPs and risks associated with pooled investment
vehicles. MLPs holding credit-related investments are subject to interest rate risk and the risk of default on payment obligations by debt issuers. MLPs that concentrate in a particular industry or a particular geographic region are subject to
risks associated with such industry or region. Investments held by MLPs may be relatively illiquid, limiting the MLPs’ ability to vary their portfolios promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions. MLPs may have limited
financial resources, their securities may trade infrequently and in limited volume, and they may be subject to more abrupt or erratic price movements than securities of larger or more broadly based companies, and may be difficult to value. MLPs
involve certain other risks, including risks related to limited control and voting rights on matters affecting MLPs, risks related to potential conflicts of interest between an MLP and the MLP’s general partner, cash flow risks, dilution risks,
and risks related to the general partner’s right to require unitholders to sell their common units at an undesirable time or price. Distributions from an MLP may consist in part of a return of the amount originally invested, which would not be
taxable to the extent the distributions do not exceed the investor’s adjusted basis in its MLP interest. These reductions in the Fund’s adjusted tax basis in the MLP securities will increase the amount of gain (or decrease the amount of loss)
recognized by the Fund on a subsequent sale of the securities.
Much of the benefit the Fund derives from its investment in equity securities of MLPs is a result of MLPs generally being treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A
change in current tax law, or a change in the business of a given MLP, could result in an MLP being treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes and subject to corporate level tax on its income, and could reduce the amount of
cash available for distribution by the MLP to its unit holders, such as the Fund. If an MLP were classified as a corporation for federal income tax purposes, the MLP may incur significant federal and state tax liability, likely causing a
reduction in the value of the Fund’s shares.
The risks of investing in an MLP generally include those inherent in investing in a partnership as opposed to a corporation. For example, state law governing partnerships is often less
restrictive than state law governing corporations. Accordingly, there may be fewer protections afforded investors in an MLP than investors in a corporation. Although unitholders of an MLP are generally limited in their liability, similar to a
corporation’s shareholders, creditors typically have the right to seek the return of distributions made to unitholders if the liability in question arose before the distributions were paid. This liability may stay attached to a unitholder even
after it sells its units.
26
Table of Contents
Master Limited Partnership Tax Risk. MLPs are generally treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Partnerships do not pay U.S. federal income tax at the
partnership level. Rather, each partner is allocated a share of the partnership’s income, gains, losses, deductions and expenses. A change in current tax law or a change in the underlying business mix of a given MLP could result in an MLP being
treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which would result in the MLP being required to pay U.S. federal income tax (as well as state and local income taxes) on its taxable income. This would have the effect of reducing
the amount of cash available for distribution by the MLP and could result in a reduction in the value of the Fund’s investment in the MLP and lower income to the Fund. To the extent a distribution received by the Fund from an MLP is treated as
a return of capital, the Fund’s adjusted tax basis in the interests of the MLP may be reduced, which will result in an increase in an amount of income or gain (or decrease in the amount of loss) that will be recognized by the Fund for tax
purposes upon the sale of any such interests or upon subsequent distributions in respect of such interests. Furthermore, any return of capital distribution received from the MLP may require the Fund to restate the character of its distributions
and amend any shareholder tax reporting previously issued. Moreover, a change in current tax law, or a change in the underlying business mix of a given MLP, could result in an MLP investment being treated as a corporation for U.S. federal
income tax purposes, which could result in a reduction of the value of the Fund’s investment in the MLP and lower income to the Fund.
The Fund may invest in MLPs taxed as C corporations. Such MLPs are obligated to pay federal income tax on their taxable income at the corporate tax rate and the amount of cash available for
distribution by such MLPs would generally be reduced by any such tax. Additionally, distributions received by the Fund would be taxed under federal income tax laws applicable to corporate dividends (as dividend income, potentially subject to
the corporate dividends received deduction, return of capital, or capital gain). Thus, investment in MLPs taxed as C corporations could result in a reduction of the value of your investment in the Fund and lower income, as compared to
investments in MLPs that are classified as partnerships for tax purposes.
Non-Diversified Fund Risk. The Fund is classified as non-diversified. As such, the percentage of the Fund’s assets invested in any single issuer or a few issuers is not limited as
much as it is for a fund classified as diversified. Investing a higher percentage of its assets in any one or a few issuers could increase the Fund’s risk of loss and its share price volatility, because the value of its shares would be more
susceptible to adverse events affecting those issuers.
Operational and Cybersecurity Risk. The Fund and its service providers, and your ability to transact with the Fund, may be negatively impacted due to operational matters arising from,
among other problems, human errors, systems and technology disruptions or failures, or cybersecurity incidents. Cybersecurity incidents may allow an unauthorized party to gain access to fund assets, customer data, or proprietary information, or
cause the Fund or its service providers, as well as the securities trading venues and their service providers, to suffer data corruption or lose operational functionality. Cybersecurity incidents can result from deliberate attacks or
unintentional events. It is not possible for NBIA or the other Fund service providers to identify all of the cybersecurity or other operational risks that may affect the Fund or to develop processes and controls to completely eliminate or
mitigate their occurrence or effects. Most issuers in which the Fund invests are heavily dependent on computers for data storage and operations, and require ready access to the internet to conduct their business. Thus, cybersecurity incidents
could also affect issuers of securities in which the Fund invests, leading to significant loss of value.
Private Placements and Other Restricted Securities Risk. Private placements and other restricted securities, including securities for which Fund management has material non-public
information, are securities that are subject to legal and/ or contractual restrictions on their sales. These securities may not be sold to the public unless certain conditions are met, which may include registration under the applicable
securities laws. As a result of the absence of a public trading market, the prices of these securities may be more difficult to determine than publicly traded securities and these securities may involve heightened risk as compared to
investments in securities of publicly traded companies. Private placements and other restricted securities may be illiquid, and it frequently can be difficult to sell them at a time when it may otherwise be desirable to do so or the Fund may be
able to sell them only at prices that are less than what the Fund regards as their fair market value. Transaction costs may be higher for these securities. In addition, the Fund may get only limited information about the issuer of a private
placement or other restricted security.
27
Table of Contents
Recent Market Conditions. Both U.S. and international markets have experienced significant volatility in recent months and years. As a result of such volatility, investment returns
may fluctuate significantly. National economies are substantially interconnected, as are global financial markets, which creates the possibility that conditions in one country or region might adversely impact issuers in a different country or
region. However, the interconnectedness of economies and/or markets may be diminishing, which may impact such economies and markets in ways that cannot be foreseen at this time.
Although interest rates were unusually low in recent years in the U.S. and abroad, recently, the Federal Reserve and certain foreign central banks began to raise interest rates as part of
their efforts to address rising inflation. In addition, ongoing inflation pressures from tight labor markets and supply chain disruptions could continue to cause an increase in interest rates and/or negatively impact companies. It is difficult
to accurately predict the pace at which interest rates might increase, or the timing, frequency or magnitude of any such increases in interest rates. Additionally, various economic and political factors could cause the Federal Reserve or other
foreign central banks to change their approach in the future and such actions may result in an economic slowdown both in the U.S. and abroad. Deteriorating economic fundamentals may, in turn, increase the risk of default or insolvency of
particular issuers, negatively impact market value, increase market volatility, cause credit spreads to widen, and reduce liquidity. Unexpected increases in interest rates could lead to market volatility or reduce liquidity in certain sectors
of the market. Also, regulators have expressed concern that rate increases may cause investors to sell fixed income securities faster than the market can absorb them, contributing to price volatility. Over the longer term, rising interest rates
may present a greater risk than has historically been the case due to the prior period of relatively low rates and the effect of government fiscal and monetary policy initiatives and potential market reaction to those initiatives, or their
alteration or cessation. Historical patterns of correlation among asset classes may break down in unanticipated ways during times of high volatility, disrupting investment programs and potentially causing losses.
Some countries, including the U.S., have in recent years adopted more protectionist trade policies. Slowing global economic growth, the rise in protectionist trade policies, changes to some
major international trade agreements, risks associated with the trade agreement between the United Kingdom and the European Union, and the risks associated with ongoing trade negotiations with China, could affect the economies of many nations
in ways that cannot necessarily be foreseen at the present time.
Russia’s invasion of the Ukraine, and corresponding events in late February 2022, have had, and could continue to have, severe adverse effects on regional and global economic markets for
securities and commodities. Following Russia’s actions, various governments, including the United States, have issued broad-ranging economic sanctions against Russia, including, among other actions, a prohibition on doing business with certain
Russian companies, large financial institutions, officials and oligarchs; the removal by certain countries and the European Union of selected Russian banks from the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications (“SWIFT”), the
electronic banking network that connects banks globally; and restrictive measures to prevent the Russian Central Bank from undermining the impact of the sanctions. The current events, including sanctions and the potential for future sanctions,
including any impacting Russia’s energy sector, and other actions, and Russia’s retaliatory responses to those sanctions and actions, may continue to adversely impact the Russian economy and economies of surrounding countries and may result in
the further decline of the value and liquidity of Russian securities and securities of surrounding countries, a continued weakening of currencies in the region and continued exchange closures, and may have other adverse consequences on the
economies of countries in the region that could impact the value of investments in the region and impair the ability of a Fund to buy, sell, receive or deliver securities of companies in the region or a Fund’s ability to collect interest
payments on fixed income securities in the region. Moreover, those events have, and could continue to have, an adverse effect on global markets performance and liquidity, thereby negatively affecting the value of a Fund’s investments beyond any
direct exposure to issuers in the region. The duration of ongoing hostilities and the vast array of sanctions and related events cannot be predicted. Those events present material uncertainty and risk with respect to markets globally and the
performance of a Fund and its investments or operations could be negatively impacted.
28
Table of Contents
Certain illnesses spread rapidly and have the potential to significantly and adversely affect the global economy. Outbreaks such as the novel coronavirus, COVID-19, or other similarly
infectious diseases may have material adverse impacts on a Fund. Epidemics and/or pandemics, such as the coronavirus, have and may further result in, among other things, closing borders, extended quarantines and stay-at-home orders, order
cancellations, disruptions to supply chains and customer activity, widespread business closures and layoffs, as well as general concern and uncertainty. The impact of this virus, and other epidemics and/or pandemics that may arise in the
future, has negatively affected and may continue to affect the economies of many nations, individual companies and the global securities and commodities markets, including their liquidity, in ways that cannot necessarily be foreseen at the
present time. The impact of any outbreak may last for an extended period of time.
High public debt in the U.S. and other countries creates ongoing systemic and market risks and policymaking uncertainty. There is no assurance that the U.S. Congress will act to raise the
nation’s debt ceiling; a failure to do so could cause market turmoil and substantial investment risks that cannot now be fully predicted. Unexpected political, regulatory and diplomatic events within the U.S. and abroad may affect investor and
consumer confidence and may adversely impact financial markets and the broader economy.
China’s economy, which has been sustained in recent years largely through a debt-financed housing boom, may be approaching the limits of that strategy and may experience a significant
slowdown as a result of debt that cannot be repaid. Due to the size of China’s economy, such a slowdown could impact a number of other countries.
There is widespread concern about the potential effects of global climate change on property and security values. Certain issuers, industries and regions may be adversely affected by the
impact of climate change in ways that cannot be foreseen. The impact of legislation, regulation and international accords related to climate change may negatively impact certain issuers and/or industries.
A rise in sea levels, a change in weather patterns, including an increase in powerful storms and large wildfires, and/or a climate-driven increase in flooding could cause properties to lose
value or become unmarketable altogether. Unlike previous declines in the real estate market, properties in affected zones may not ever recover their value. The U.S. administration appears concerned about the climate change problem and is
focusing regulatory and public works projects around those concerns. Regulatory changes and divestment movements tied to concerns about climate change could adversely affect the value of certain land and the viability of industries whose
activities or products are seen as accelerating climate change.
Losses related to climate change could adversely affect corporate issuers and mortgage lenders, the value of mortgage-backed securities, the bonds of municipalities that depend on tax or
other revenues and tourist dollars generated by affected properties, and insurers of the property and/or of corporate, municipal or mortgage-backed securities. Since property and security values are driven largely by buyers’ perceptions, it is
difficult to know the time period over which these market effects might unfold.
Risk Management. Risk is an essential part of investing. No risk management program can eliminate the Fund’s exposure to adverse events; at best, it may only reduce the possibility
that the Fund will be affected by such events, and especially those risks that are not intrinsic to the Fund’s investment program. The Fund could experience losses if judgments about risk prove to be incorrect.
Sector Risk. From time to time, based on market or economic conditions, the Fund may have significant positions in one or more sectors of the market. To the extent the Fund invests
more heavily in particular sectors, its performance will be especially sensitive to developments that significantly affect those sectors. Individual sectors may be more volatile, and may perform differently, than the broader market. The
industries that constitute a sector may all react in the same way to economic, political or regulatory events.
29
Table of Contents
Shareholder Activism Risk. Shareholder activism can take many forms, including making public demands that the Fund consider certain alternatives, engaging in public campaigns to
attempt to influence the Fund’s governance and/or management, commencing proxy contests in an effort to elect the activists’ representatives or others to the Fund’s Board of Directors or to seek other actions such as a tender offer or Fund
liquidation, and commencing litigation. Shareholder activism arises in a variety of situations, and has been increasing in the closed-end fund space recently, including litigation challenging closed-end fund defenses. While the Fund is
currently not subject to any shareholder activism, due to the potential volatility of the Fund’s common stock market price and for a variety of other reasons, the Fund may in the future become the target of shareholder activism. Shareholder
activism could result in substantial costs and divert Management’s and the Fund’s Board’s attention and resources from its business. Also, the Fund may be required to incur significant legal and other expenses related to any activist
shareholder matters. Further, the Fund’s stock price could be subject to significant fluctuation or otherwise be adversely affected by the events, risks and uncertainties of any shareholder activism. Shareholder activists seek short-term
actions that can increase Fund costs per share and be detrimental to long-term stockholders.
Small- and Mid-Cap Companies Risk. At times, small- and mid-cap companies may be out of favor with investors. Compared to larger companies, small- and mid-cap companies may depend on
a more limited management group, may have a shorter history of operations, less publicly available information, less stable earnings, and limited product lines, markets or financial resources. The securities of small- and mid-cap companies are
often more volatile, which at times can be rapid and unpredictable, and less liquid than the securities of larger companies and may be more affected than other types of securities by the underperformance of a sector, during market downturns or
by adverse publicity and investor perceptions.
Tax Risk. Unlike other closed-end funds that are structured as regulated investment companies for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Fund will be taxable as a regular corporation,
or “C” corporation, for U.S. federal income tax purposes. This means the Fund generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on its taxable income at the rates applicable to corporations (currently at a maximum rate of 21%), and will also
be subject to state and local income taxes.
Valuation Risk. The Fund may not be able to sell an investment at the price at which the Fund has valued the investment. Such differences could be significant, particularly for
illiquid securities and securities that trade in relatively thin markets and/or markets that experience extreme volatility. If market or other conditions make it difficult to value an investment, the Fund may be required to value such
investments using more subjective methods, known as fair value methodologies. Using fair value methodologies to price investments may result in a value that is different from an investment’s most recent price and from the prices used by other
funds to calculate their NAVs. The Fund uses pricing services to provide values for certain securities and there is no assurance that the Fund will be able to sell an investment at the price established by such pricing services. The Fund’s
ability to value its investments in an accurate and timely manner may be impacted by technological issues and/or errors by third party service providers, such as pricing services or accounting agents.
30
Table of Contents
Distribution Reinvestment Plan
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC (the “Plan Agent”) will act as Plan Agent for stockholders who have not elected in writing to receive dividends and other distributions in
cash (each a “Participant”), will open an account for each Participant under the Distribution Reinvestment Plan (“Plan”) in the same name as its then-current shares of the Fund’s common stock (“Shares”) are registered, and will put the Plan
into effect for each Participant as of the first record date for a dividend or other distribution after the account is opened.
Whenever the Fund declares a dividend or distribution with respect to the Shares, each Participant will receive such dividends and other distributions in additional Shares, including
fractional Shares acquired by the Plan Agent and credited to each Participant’s account. If on the payment date for a cash dividend or distribution, the net asset value is equal to or less than the market price per Share plus estimated
brokerage commissions, the Plan Agent shall automatically receive such Shares, including fractions, for each Participant’s account. Except in the circumstances described in the next paragraph, the number of additional Shares to be credited to
each Participant’s account shall be determined by dividing the dollar amount of the dividend or distribution payable on its Shares by the greater of the net asset value per Share determined as of the date of purchase or 95% of the then-current
market price per Share on the payment date.
Should the net asset value per Share exceed the market price per Share plus estimated brokerage commissions on the payment date for a cash dividend or distribution, the Fund may, but is not
required to, issue new Shares. If the Fund does not issue new Shares, and the net asset value per Share exceeds the market price per Share plus estimated brokerage commissions on the payment date for a cash dividend or distribution, then the
Plan Agent or a broker-dealer selected by the Plan Agent shall endeavor, for a purchase period lasting until the last business day before the next date on which the Shares trade on an “ex-distribution” basis, but in no event, except as provided
below, more than 30 days after the payment date, to apply the amount of such dividend or distribution on each Participant’s Shares (less their pro rata share of brokerage commissions incurred with respect to the Plan Agent’s open-market
purchases in connection with the reinvestment of such dividend or distribution) to purchase Shares on the open market for each Participant’s account.
No such purchases may be made more than 30 days after the payment date for such dividend or distribution except where temporary curtailment or suspension of purchase is necessary to comply
with applicable provisions of federal securities laws. If, at the close of business on any day during the purchase period the net asset value per Share equals or is less than the market price per Share plus estimated brokerage commissions, the
Plan Agent will not make any further open-market purchases in connection with the reinvestment of such dividend or distribution. If the Plan Agent is unable to invest the full dividend or distribution amount through open-market purchases during
the purchase period, the Plan Agent shall request that, with respect to the uninvested portion of such dividend or distribution amount, the Fund issue new Shares at the close of business on the earlier of the last day of the purchase period or
the first day during the purchase period on which the net asset value per Share equals or is less than the market price per Share, plus estimated brokerage commissions, such Shares to be issued in accordance with the terms specified in the
third paragraph hereof. These newly issued Shares will be valued at the then-current market price per Share at the time such Shares are to be issued.
For purposes of making the reinvestment purchase comparison under the Plan, (a) the market price of the Shares on a particular date shall be the last sales price on the New York Stock
Exchange (or if the Shares are not listed on the New York Stock Exchange, such other exchange on which the Shares are principally traded) on that date, or, if there is no sale on such Exchange (or if not so listed, in the over-the-counter
market) on that date, then the mean between the closing bid and asked quotations for such Shares on such Exchange on such date and (b) the net asset value per Share on a particular date shall be the net asset value per Share most recently
calculated by or on behalf of the Fund. All dividends, distributions and other payments (whether made in cash or Shares) shall be made net of any applicable withholding tax.
31
Table of Contents
Open-market purchases provided for above may be made on any securities exchange where the Fund’s Shares are traded, in the over-the-counter market or in negotiated transactions and may be on
such terms as to price, delivery and otherwise as the Plan Agent shall determine. Each Participant’s uninvested funds held by the Plan Agent will not bear interest, and it is understood that, in any event, the Plan Agent shall have no liability
in connection with any inability to purchase Shares within 30 days after the initial date of such purchase as herein provided, or with the timing of any purchases effected. The Plan Agent shall have no responsibility as to the value of the
Shares acquired for each Participant’s account. For the purpose of cash investments, the Plan Agent may commingle each Participant’s funds with those of other stockholders of the Fund for whom the Plan Agent similarly acts as agent, and the
average price (including brokerage commissions) of all Shares purchased by the Plan Agent as Plan Agent shall be the price per Share allocable to each Participant in connection therewith.
The Plan Agent may hold each Participant’s Shares acquired pursuant to the Plan together with the Shares of other stockholders of the Fund acquired pursuant to the Plan in noncertificated
form in the Plan Agent’s name or that of the Plan Agent’s nominee. The Plan Agent will forward to each Participant any proxy solicitation material and will vote any Shares so held for each Participant only in accordance with the instructions
set forth on proxies returned by the Participant to the Fund.
The Plan Agent will confirm to each Participant each acquisition made for its account as soon as practicable but not later than 60 days after the date thereof. Although each Participant may
from time to time have an undivided fractional interest (computed to three decimal places) in a Share, no certificates for a fractional Share will be issued. However, dividends and distributions on fractional Shares will be credited to each
Participant’s account. In the event of termination of a Participant’s account under the Plan, the Plan Agent will adjust for any such undivided fractional interest in cash at the market value of the Shares at the time of termination, less the
pro rata expense of any sale required to make such an adjustment.
Any Share dividends or split Shares distributed by the Fund on Shares held by the Plan Agent for Participants will be credited to their accounts. In the event that the Fund makes available
to its stockholders rights to purchase additional Shares or other securities, the Shares held for each Participant under the Plan will be added to other Shares held by the Participant in calculating the number of rights to be issued to each
Participant.
The Plan Agent’s service fee for handling capital gains and other distributions or income dividends will be paid by the Fund. Participants will be charged their pro rata share of brokerage
commissions on all open-market purchases.
Each Participant may terminate its account under the Plan by notifying the Plan Agent in writing. Such termination will be effective immediately if the Participant’s notice is received by
the Plan Agent not less than ten days prior to any dividend or distribution record date, otherwise such termination will be effective the first trading day after the payment date for such dividend or distribution with respect to any subsequent
dividend or distribution. The Plan may be terminated by the Plan Agent or the Fund upon notice in writing mailed to each Participant at least 30 days prior to any record date for the payment of any dividend or distribution by the Fund.
These terms and conditions may be amended or supplemented by the Plan Agent or the Fund at any time or times but, except when necessary or appropriate to comply with applicable law or the
rules or policies of the Securities and Exchange Commission or any other regulatory authority, only by mailing to each Participant appropriate written notice at least 30 days prior to the effective date thereof. The amendment or supplement
shall be deemed to be accepted by each Participant unless, prior to the effective date thereof, the Plan Agent receives written notice of the termination of its account under the Plan. Any such amendment may include an appointment by the Plan
Agent in its place and stead of a successor Plan Agent under these terms and conditions, with full power and authority to perform all or any of the acts to be performed by the Plan Agent under these terms and conditions. Upon any such
appointment of any Plan Agent for the purpose of receiving dividends and other distributions, the Fund will be authorized to pay to such successor Plan Agent, for each Participant’s account, all dividends and other distributions payable on
Shares held in its name or under the Plan for retention or application by such successor Plan Agent as provided in these terms and conditions.
32
Table of Contents
The Plan Agent shall at all times act in good faith and agrees to use its best efforts within reasonable limits to ensure the accuracy of all services performed under this Agreement and to
comply with applicable law, but assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable for loss or damage due to errors unless such error is caused by the Plan Agent’s negligence, bad faith, or willful misconduct or that of its employees. These
terms and conditions are governed by the laws of the State of Maryland.
Reinvested dividends and distributions are taxed in the same manner as cash dividends and distributions — i.e., reinvestment in additional Shares does not relieve stockholders of, or defer
the need to pay, any income tax that may be payable (or that is required to be withheld) on Fund dividends and distributions. Participants should contact their tax professionals for information on how the Plan impacts their personal tax
situation. For additional information about the Plan, please contact the Plan Agent by telephone at 1-866-227-2136 or by mail at 6201 15th Avenue, Brooklyn, NY, 11219 or online at www.astfinancial.com.
33
Table of Contents
Directory
Investment Manager and Administrator
Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC
1290 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10104-0002
877.461.1899
Custodian
U.S. Bank, National Association
1555 North Rivercenter Drive, Suite 302
Milwaukee, WI 53212
Transfer Agent
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC
6201 15th Avenue
Brooklyn, NY 11219
Shareholder Services 866.227.2136
Plan Agent
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC
Plan Administration Department
P.O. Box 922
Wall Street Station
New York, NY 10269-0560
Overnight correspondence should be sent to:
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC
6201 15th Avenue
Brooklyn, NY 11219
Legal Counsel
K&L Gates LLP
1601 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006-1600
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Ernst & Young LLP
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
34
Table of Contents
Report of Votes of Stockholders
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on September 16, 2022. Stockholders voted to elect three Class II Directors to serve until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2025, or until
their successors are elected and qualified. The Class I Directors (which include Marc Gary, Michael M. Knetter and Tom D. Seip) and the Class III Directors (which include Joseph V. Amato, Martha C. Goss and James G. Stavridis) continue to hold
office until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2024 and 2023, respectively, or until their successors are elected and qualified.
To elect three Class II Directors to serve until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2025 or until their successors are elected and qualified.
Shares of Common Stock
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes
Withheld |
|
Abstentions |
|
Broker
Non-Votes |
Michael J. Cosgrove |
|
31,073,344 |
|
14,586,166 |
|
— |
|
— |
Deborah C. McLean |
|
31,082,732 |
|
14,576,779 |
|
— |
|
— |
George W. Morriss |
|
31,261,005 |
|
14,398,505 |
|
— |
|
— |
45
Table of Contents
Board Consideration of the Management Agreement
On an annual basis, the Board of Directors (the “Board or “Directors”) of Neuberger Berman MLP and Energy Income Fund Inc. (the “Fund”), including the Directors who are not “interested
persons” of the Fund or of Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC (“Management”) (including its affiliates), as such term is defined under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (“1940 Act”), (“Independent Fund Directors”), considers
whether to continue the Fund’s management agreement with Management (the “Agreement”). Throughout the process, the Independent Fund Directors are advised by counsel that is experienced in 1940 Act matters and that is independent of Management
(“Independent Counsel”). At a meeting held on September 29, 2022, the Board, including the Independent Fund Directors, approved the continuation of the Agreement for the Fund.
In evaluating the Agreement, the Board, including the Independent Fund Directors, reviewed extensive materials provided by Management in response to questions submitted by the Independent
Fund Directors and Independent Counsel, and met with senior representatives of Management regarding its personnel, operations, and profitability as they relate to the Fund. The annual contract review extends over at least two regular meetings
of the Board to ensure that Management has time to respond to any questions the Independent Fund Directors may have on their initial review of the materials and that the Independent Fund Directors have time to consider those responses.
Additionally, the Board considered the impact of significant periods of market volatility that occurred during and after the period for which information was requested in conducting its evaluation of Management.
In connection with its deliberations, the Board also considered the broad range of information relevant to the annual contract review that is provided to the Board (including its various
standing committees) at meetings throughout the year, including reports on investment performance based on net asset value and common stock market prices, portfolio risk, use of leverage, information regarding share price premiums and/or
discounts, and other portfolio information for the Fund, as well as periodic reports on, among other matters, pricing and valuation; quality and cost of portfolio trade execution; compliance; and stockholder and other services provided by
Management and its affiliates. The Contract Review Committee, which is comprised solely of Independent Fund Directors, was established by the Board to assist in its evaluation and analysis of materials for the annual contract review. The Board
has also established other committees that focus throughout the year on specific areas relevant to the annual contract review, such as Fund performance or compliance matters, and that are charged with specific responsibilities regarding the
annual contract review. Those committees provide reports to the full Board, including the members of the Contract Review Committee, which considers that information as part of the annual contract review process. The Contract Review Committee
annually considers and updates the questions it asks of Management in light of legal advice furnished to it by Independent Counsel; its own business judgment; and developments in the industry, in the markets, in fund regulation and litigation,
and in Management’s business model.
The Independent Fund Directors received from Independent Counsel a memorandum discussing the legal standards for their consideration of the proposed continuation of the Agreement. During
the course of the year and during their deliberations regarding the annual contract review, the Contract Review Committee and the Independent Fund Directors met with Independent Counsel separately from representatives of Management.
Provided below is a description of the Board’s contract approval process and material factors that the Board considered at its meetings regarding renewals of the Agreement and the
compensation to be paid thereunder. In connection with its approval of the continuation of the Agreement, the Board evaluated the terms of the Agreement, the overall fairness of the Agreement to the Fund, and whether the Agreement was in the
best interests of the Fund and Fund stockholders. The Board’s determination to approve the continuation of the Agreement was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Board throughout the year and specifically in
connection with the annual contract review.
46
Table of Contents
This description is not intended to include all of the factors considered by the Board. The Board members did not identify any particular information or factor that was all-important or
controlling, and each Director may have attributed different weights to the various factors. The Board focused on the costs and benefits of the Agreement to the Fund and, through the Fund, Fund stockholders.
Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services
With respect to the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided, the Board considered the investment philosophy and decision-making processes of, and the qualifications,
experience, and capabilities of, and the resources available to, the portfolio management personnel of Management who perform services for the Fund. The Board also considered Management’s long history and experience in managing and operating
closed-end funds, such as the Fund, including experience monitoring and assessing discounts and premiums and complying with securities exchange requirements. The Board noted that Management also provides certain administrative services,
including fund accounting and compliance services. The Board also considered Management’s policies and practices regarding brokerage, commissions, other trading costs, and allocation of portfolio transactions and reviewed the quality of the
execution services that Management had provided. The Board also reviewed Management’s use of brokers to execute Fund transactions that provide research services to Management. Moreover, the Board considered Management’s approach to potential
conflicts of interest both generally and between the Fund’s investments and those of other funds or accounts managed by Management.
The Board recognized the extensive range of services that Management provides to the Fund beyond the investment management services. The Board noted that Management is also responsible
for monitoring compliance with the Fund’s investment objective, policies, and restrictions, as well as compliance with applicable law, including implementing rulemaking initiatives of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition,
the Board considered that Management has developed a leverage structure for the Fund tailored to its investment strategy and needs, has monitored the Fund’s ongoing compliance with legal and other restrictions associated with its leverage, and
has recommended changes in and/or amendments to the amount or structure of its leverage over time. The Board also considered that Management assumes significant ongoing entrepreneurial and business risks as the investment adviser and sponsor to
the Fund, for which it is entitled to reasonable compensation. The Directors also considered that Management’s responsibilities include continual management of investment, operational, cybersecurity, enterprise, legal, regulatory, and
compliance risks as they relate to the Fund, and the Board considers on a regular basis information regarding Management’s processes for monitoring and managing risk. In addition, the Board noted that when Management launches a new fund, it
assumes entrepreneurial risk with respect to that fund, and that some funds have been liquidated without ever having been profitable to Management.
The Board also reviewed and evaluated Management’s activities under its contractual obligation to oversee the Fund’s various outside service providers, including its evaluation of service
providers’ infrastructure, cybersecurity programs, compliance programs, and business continuity programs, among other matters. The Board also considered Management’s ongoing development of its own infrastructure and information technology to
support the Fund through, among other things, cybersecurity, business continuity planning, and risk management. The Board noted Management’s largely seamless implementation of its business continuity plan in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
and its success in continuously providing services to the Fund not withstanding the disruptions caused by the pandemic. In addition, the Board noted the positive compliance history of Management, as no significant compliance problems were
reported to the Board with respect to Management. The Board also considered the general structure of the portfolio managers’ compensation and whether this structure provides appropriate incentives to act in the best interests of the Fund. The
Board also considered the ability of Management to attract and retain qualified personnel to service the Fund.
47
Table of Contents
As in past years, the Board also considered the manner in which Management addressed various matters that arose during the year, some of them a result of developments in the broader fund
industry or the regulations governing it. In addition, the Board considered actions taken by Management in response to recent market conditions, such as the economic dislocation and rise in volatility related to the efforts to stem the spread
of COVID-19, and considered the overall performance of Management in this context. The Board also noted that Management actively monitors any discount from net asset value per share at which the Fund’s common stock trades and evaluates
potential ways to mitigate the discount and potential impacts on the discount, including the level of distributions that the Fund pays. The Board likewise took into account that Management monitors, to the extent information is publicly
available, events that may disrupt the Fund’s long-term investment program.
Fund Performance
The Board requested a report from an outside consulting firm that specializes in the analysis of fund industry data that compared the Fund’s performance, along with its fees and other
expenses, to a group of industry peers (“Expense Group”) and to a broader universe of funds pursuing generally similar strategies with the same investment classification and/or objective (“Performance Universe”). The Board considered the Fund’s
performance and fees in light of the limitations inherent in the methodology for constructing such comparative groups and determining which investment companies should be included in the comparative groups, noting differences as compared to
certain fund industry ranking and rating systems. The Board also considered the impact and inherent limitation on the comparisons due to the small number of funds included in the Expense Group and Performance Universe. In this regard, the Board
recognized that the number of leveraged closed-end funds pursuing similar strategies with the same investment classification and/or objective as the Fund has decreased over time. The Board also recognized the limitations inherent in comparing
the Fund’s performance to a benchmark index due to the Fund’s use of leverage and pursuit of an investment strategy that is not tied directly to an index. The Board also recognized the inherent limitations in comparing performance of peer funds
utilizing leverage in light of, among other things, the impacts due to the level and type of leverage utilized and when peer funds entered into their leverage arrangements (which can impact pricing and, therefore, cost and performance). The
Board also considered the premium/discount levels at which peer funds traded along with the distribution rates and yields of those funds.
With respect to investment performance, the Board considered information regarding the Fund’s short- and intermediate-term performance, net of the Fund’s fees and expenses, on an absolute
basis, relative to a benchmark index that does not deduct the fees or expenses of investing, and compared to the performance of its Expense Group and Performance Universe, each constructed by the consulting firm. The Board also reviewed
performance in relation to certain measures of the degree of investment risk undertaken by the portfolio managers.
The Performance Universe referenced in this section was identified by the consulting firm, as discussed above and the risk/return ratios referenced are the Sharpe ratios provided by the
consulting firm. In the case of underperformance for any of the periods reported, the Board considered the magnitude and duration of that underperformance relative to the Performance Universe and/or the benchmark (e.g., the amount by which the
Fund underperformed, including, for example, whether the Fund slightly underperformed or significantly underperformed its benchmark). With respect to performance quintile rankings for the Fund compared to its Performance Universe, the first
quintile represents the highest (best) performance and the fifth quintile represents the lowest performance.
The Board considered that, based on performance data for the periods ended December 31, 2021: (1) as compared to its benchmark, the Fund’s performance was higher for the 1-year period and
lower for the 3- and 5-year periods; and (2) as compared to its Performance Universe, the Fund’s performance was in the second quintile for the 1-year period and the first quintile for the 3- and 5-year periods. The Fund was launched in 2013
and therefore does not have 10-year performance. The Board also took into account that the Fund showed a risk/return ratio that was better than the
48
Table of Contents
median of its Performance Universe for the 3- and 5-year periods, meaning that per unit of risk taken versus a presumed risk-free investment, the Fund achieved a higher level of return
than the median of its Performance Universe for those same periods.
The Board’s Closed-End Funds Committee also met with the portfolio managers of the Fund during the 12 months prior to voting on the contract renewal to discuss the Fund’s performance,
distribution levels, and the use of leverage. The Board noted that the type, amount and term of the leverage are consistent with the portfolio managers’ preferences for the Fund’s investment strategy. The Board also took into account the
positive impact the Fund’s leverage arrangements had on performance. The Board also considered Management’s responsiveness with respect to the relative performance. The Board recognized that the performance data reflects a snapshot of a period
as of a particular date and that selecting a different performance period could produce significantly different results. The Board further acknowledged that long-term performance could be impacted by even one period of significant
outperformance or underperformance, and that a single investment theme could disproportionately affect performance. In this regard, the Board noted that performance, especially short-term performance, is only one of the factors that it deems
relevant to its consideration of the Agreement and that, after considering all relevant factors, it determined to approve the continuation of the Agreement.
Fee Rates, Profitability, and Fall-out Benefits
With respect to the overall fairness of the Agreement, the Board considered the fee structure for the Fund under the Agreement as compared to the Expense Group provided by the consulting
firm, as discussed above. The Board reviewed a comparison of the Fund’s management fee to its Expense Group. The Board noted that the comparative management fee analysis includes, in the Fund’s management fee, the separate administrative fees
paid to Management. However, the Board noted that some funds in the Expense Group pay directly from fund assets for certain services that Management covers out of the administration fees for the Fund. Accordingly, the Board also considered the
Fund’s total expense ratio as compared with its Expense Group as a way of taking account of these differences. The Board considered that only leveraged closed-end funds were considered for inclusion in the Expense Group presented for comparison
with the Fund but also noted the challenges associated with making comparisons regarding expenses for leveraged closed-end funds. The Board took into account Management’s representations that relevant expenses would be difficult for the
consulting firm to fully and accurately identify due to, among other things, differences in the type of leverage used and the way such leverage costs are reported. The Board also considered Management’s representations regarding the potential
impact on expenses due to the time at which the funds in the Expense Group entered into their leverage arrangements and the funds’ fiscal year-ends (which determine the time period for which leverage costs are reported). With this
understanding, the Board also considered the impact of investment-related expenses and taxes on the total expenses of the Fund and the funds in the Expense Group that the consulting firm was able to identify. The Board also considered
Management’s representations that there were certain characteristics of leverage that increased leverage expenses but provided benefits and value to stockholders that were not reflected in the Fund’s expense ratio. The Board also considered
that, in comparison to certain other products managed by Management, including open-end funds, there are additional portfolio management challenges in managing closed-end funds such as the Fund, including those associated with less liquid
holdings and the use of leverage.
The Board considered the Fund’s contractual management fee on managed assets (generally consisting of net assets plus leverage proceeds), as well as the actual management fee on managed
assets as a percentage of assets attributable to common stockholders as compared to the Fund’s Expense Group. The Board was aware of the additional expenses borne by common stockholders as a result of the Fund’s leveraged structure. The Board
took into account that Management has a financial incentive for the Fund to continue to use leverage, which may create a conflict of interest. It also considered Management’s representation that it continues to believe the use of leverage is in
the best interests of the Fund’s stockholders regardless of the level of compensation Management receives. With respect to the quintile rankings
49
Table of Contents
for fees and total expenses (net of waivers or other adjustments, if any) on managed assets for the Fund compared to its Expense Group, the first quintile represents the lowest (best)
fees and/or total expenses and the fifth quintile represents the highest fees and/or total expenses.
The Board considered that, as compared to its Expense Group, the Fund’s contractual management fee and total expenses each ranked in the first quintile, and the actual management fee and
total expenses excluding the investment-related expenses and taxes identified by the consulting firm each ranked in the second quintile.
In determining to renew the Agreement, the Board took into account Management’s representations regarding the effect that the cost of leverage had on the Fund’s total expenses relative to
its peers with different types and levels of leverage and noted Management’s efforts to ensure the Fund’s leverage arrangements were among the best available for a fund of its size and investment strategy and with its preferences regarding
types and levels of leverage at the time the Fund entered into its leverage arrangements. In addition, the Board considered its Closed-End Fund Committee’s ongoing evaluation of the Fund, including the use of leverage and the specific leverage
arrangements.
In concluding that the benefits accruing to Management and its affiliates by virtue of their relationship with the Fund were reasonable in light of the costs of providing the investment
advisory and other services and the benefits accruing to the Fund, the Board reviewed specific data as to Management’s estimated profit on the Fund for a recent period on a pre-tax basis without regard to distribution expenses, but including
year-over-year changes in each of Management’s reported expense categories. (The Board also reviewed data on Management’s estimated profit on the Fund after distribution/servicing expenses and taxes were factored in, as indicators of the health
of the business and the extent to which Management is directing its profits into the growth of the business.) The Board considered the cost allocation methodology that Management used in developing its estimated profitability figures. In recent
years, the Board engaged an independent forensic accountant to review the profitability methodology utilized by Management when preparing this information and discussed with the consultant its conclusion that Management’s process for
calculating and reporting its estimated profit was not unreasonable.
Recognizing that there is no uniform methodology regarding the allocation of firm-wide or complex-wide expenses within the asset management industry for determining profitability for this
purpose and that the use of different reasonable methodologies can give rise to different profit and loss results, the Board, in recent years, requested from Management examples of profitability calculated by different methods and noted that
the estimated profitability levels were still reasonable when calculated by these other methods. The Board further noted Management’s representation that its estimate of profitability is derived using methodology that is consistent with the
methodology used to assess and/or report measures of profitability elsewhere at the firm. In addition, the Board recognized that Management’s calculations regarding its costs may not reflect all risks, including regulatory, legal, operational,
cybersecurity, reputational, and, where appropriate, entrepreneurial risks, associated with offering and managing a closed-end fund in the current regulatory and market environment. The Board also considered any fall-out (i.e., indirect)
benefits likely to accrue to Management or its affiliates from their relationship with the Fund, such as research it may receive from broker-dealers executing the Fund’s portfolio transactions on an agency basis. The Board recognized that
Management and its affiliates should be entitled to earn a reasonable level of profits for services they provide to the Fund and, based on review, concluded that Management’s reported level of estimated profitability on the Fund was reasonable.
50
Table of Contents
Information Regarding Services to Other Clients
The Board also considered whether there were other funds or separate accounts that were advised or sub-advised by Management or its affiliates with investment objectives, policies, and
strategies that were similar to those of the Fund. The Board compared the fees charged to the Fund to the fees charged to such comparable funds, noting Management’s representation that there were no such separate accounts. The Board considered
the appropriateness and reasonableness of any differences between the fees charged to the Fund and such comparable funds, and determined that differences in fees and fee structures were consistent with the differences in the management and
other services provided. The Board explored with Management its assertion that although, generally, the rates of fees paid by such funds, except other Neuberger Berman mutual funds, were lower than the fee rates paid by the Fund, the
differences reflected Management’s greater level of responsibilities and significantly broader scope of services to the Fund, the more extensive regulatory obligations and risks associated with managing the Fund, and other financial
considerations with respect to creation and sponsorship of the Fund.
Economies of Scale
The Board also evaluated apparent or anticipated economies of scale in relation to the services Management provides to the Fund and noted that there is little expectation that closed-end
funds will show significant economies of scale. The Board considered that, as a closed-end investment company, the Fund does not continually offer new shares to raise additional assets (as does a typical open-end investment company), but may
experience asset growth through investment performance and/or the increased use of leverage. The Board also considered that Management has provided, at no added cost to the Fund, certain additional services, including but not limited to,
services required by new regulations or regulatory interpretations, services impelled by changes in the securities markets or the business landscape, and/or services requested by the Board. The Board considered that this is a way of sharing
economies of scale with the Fund and its stockholders.
Conclusions
In approving the continuation of the Agreement, the Board concluded that, in its business judgment, the terms of the Agreement are fair and reasonable to the Fund and that approval of the
continuation of the Agreement is in the best interests of the Fund and Fund stockholders. In reaching this determination, the Board considered that Management could be expected to continue to provide a high level of service to the Fund; that
the Board retained confidence in Management’s capabilities to manage the Fund; that the Fund’s fee structure appeared to the Board to be reasonable given the nature, extent, and quality of services provided; and that the benefits accruing to
Management and Management’s affiliates by virtue of their relationship with the Fund were reasonable in light of the costs of providing the investment advisory and other services and the benefits accruing to the Fund. The Board’s conclusions
may be based in part on its consideration of materials prepared in connection with the approval or continuance of the Agreement in prior years and on the Board’s ongoing regular review of Fund performance and operations throughout the year, in
addition to material prepared specifically for the most recent annual review of the Agreement.
51
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC
1290 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10104–0002
Internal Sales & Services
877.461.1899
www.nb.com
Statistics and projections in this report are derived from sources deemed to be reliable but cannot be regarded as a representation of future results of the
Fund. This report is prepared for the general information of stockholders and is not an offer for shares of the Fund.
N0372 01/23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|