NYSE: VZLA TSX-V:
VZLA
After-Tax NPV (5%) of US$1,137 million, After-Tax IRR of 85.7%, Initial
Capex of US$224 million,
Average Annual Production of 15.2 million oz AgEq at AISC of
US$9.40 per oz AgEq
VANCOUVER, BC, July 24,
2024 /PRNewswire/ - Vizsla Silver Corp.
(TSXV: VZLA) (NYSE: VZLA) (Frankfurt: 0G3) ("Vizsla Silver" or the
"Company") is pleased to announce the results from the
independent preliminary economic assessment ("PEA") on its
100%-owned flagship Panuco
silver-gold project ("Panuco" or the "Panuco Project")
located in Mexico.
The PEA, completed by Ausenco Engineering Canada ULC
("Ausenco"), supported by Entech Mining Ltd.
("Entech") and SGS Canada Inc. ("SGS"), provides a
robust base case assessment for developing Panuco as a long-life, high-margin underground
precious metals mine with low initial capital requirements and a
fast timeline to production.
"An estimated after-tax NPV (5%) of more than US$1.1 billion, an after-tax IRR of 85.7% and a
payback period of approximately nine months, helps solidify
Panuco as a world class
development project in the precious metals space," commented
Michael Konnert, President and CEO.
"The PEA, based on conservative metals prices of US$26/oz silver and US$1,975/oz gold, outlines a high-margin,
underground silver primary mine with substantial silver-gold
production of 162.1 million silver-equivalent ounces over an
initial 11-year mine life. Annually, the mine is projected to
produce an average of 15.2 million silver-equivalent ounces,
providing exceptional free cash flow, particularly in the early
years, allowing for a very rapid payback of the estimated low
initial Capex of US$224 million. It's
important to note, that this PEA represents only a snapshot of the
potential value of Panuco, as we
have only explored less than 30% of the known targets in the
district. Furthermore, ongoing drilling with two drill rigs
continues to expand and convert high-grade veins in and around the
proposed mine plan, enhancing the potential for improved economics
in a feasibility study planned for the second half of 2025.
Panuco benefits from excellent
access to existing infrastructure, significant exploration upside
potential to discover new mineralized centers and potentially new
standalone projects hosting similar economics to that outlined in
today's study. As such, it's becoming increasingly clear that
Panuco will be a meaningful
contributor to the silver industry for decades to come. I would
like to thank everyone at Vizsla Silver, our stakeholders and
community members for all the hard work over the years to reach
this monumental milestone."
The Company cautions that the results of the PEA are preliminary
in nature and include inferred mineral resources that are
considered too speculative geologically to have economic
consideration applied to them to be classified as mineral reserves.
There is no certainty that the results of the PEA will be realized.
Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have
demonstrated economic viability.
PEA Webcast
Vizsla Silver will be hosting a webcast to discuss the PEA at
10:00 am PT (1:00 pm ET) on Thursday,
July 25, 2024. To register, please click here.
PEA Highlights (Base Case)
- 3,300 tonnes per day ("tpd") production rate for the
first three years, expanding to 4,000 tpd in year 4, producing
silver-gold doré with an initial mine life of 10.6 years.
- High-grade underground mine with mineralized
material1 averaging US$253/t NSR value (diluted) comprising
Copala deposit with 5.3 Mt
averaging 316g/t Ag, 1.97 g/t Au.
- Life of Mine ("LOM") average annual payable production
of 15,225 koz AgEq2 per year (9,268 koz Ag per year and
78 koz Au per year).
- Years 1-2 average annual payable production of 20,185 koz AgEq
per year (13,756 koz Ag per year and 85 koz Au per year).
- LOM cash costs3 of US$7.98/oz payable AgEq on a co-product basis,
LOM all-in sustaining costs (AISC4) of US$9.40/oz payable AgEq on a co-product
basis.
- Initial capital expenditures of USD$224M.
- After-tax NPV (5%) of US$1,137M
and 85.7% IRR at US$26/oz Ag and
US$1,975/oz Au.
- After-tax payback period of 9 months.
Notes:
|
1.
|
Underground mineralized
material contains, Indicated and Inferred Resources
|
2.
|
Payable Silver
Equivalent (AgEq.) calculated by dividing gross sales revenue by
$26.00 (silver price)
|
3.
|
Total cash costs
consist of operating cash costs plus royalties and offsite
(refining & transport) charges
|
4.
|
AISC consist of total
cash costs plus sustaining capital
|
|
|
PEA Overview
The PEA considers two contiguous underground mines, the Copala
Mine and the Napoleon Mine, with on-site treatment of the mined
material processed through a 3-stage crushing-grinding circuit,
along with a leach and Merrill Crowe circuit to produce silver-gold
doré bars. The mines will be contractor-operated utilizing
ramp-access and a combination of long-hole stoping and
drift-and-fill mining methods.
The processing throughput capacity of 3,300 tonnes per day for
the first three years, expanding to 4,000 tonnes per day in year
four, results in an initial mine life of 10.6 years. The PEA
leverages Panuco's existing
infrastructure, including all-weather access roads, permits, power
and its proximity to the Concordia Municipality with its skilled
labour pool.
The PEA is derived using the Company's mineral resource estimate
published on September 01, 2023 (the
"MRE"). The effective date of the PEA is July 24, 2024, and a technical report (the
"Technical Report") will be filed on the Company's website
and SEDAR+ within 45 days of this news release.
General
|
LOM Total /
Avg.
|
Gold Price
(US$/oz)
|
1,975
|
Silver Price
(US$/oz)
|
26.00
|
Mine Life
(Years)
|
10.6
|
Total Processed Feed
Tonnes (kt)
|
14,607
|
Total Waste Tonnes
(kt)
|
4,975
|
Production
|
LOM Total / Avg.
|
Head Grade – Ag
(g/t)
|
228
|
Head Grade – Au
(g/t)
|
1.90
|
Recovery Rate – Ag (%)
to doré
|
92.2 %
|
Recovery Rate – Au (%)
to doré
|
93.8 %
|
Total Metal Payable –
Ag (koz)
|
98,697
|
Total Metal Payable –
Au (koz)
|
835
|
Average Annual Payable
Production – Ag (koz)
|
9,268
|
Average Annual Payable
Production – Au (koz)
|
78
|
Average Annual Payable
Production – AgEq. (koz)
|
15,225
|
Average Annual Payable
Production (Yrs 1-2) – AgEq. (koz)
|
20,185
|
Operating Costs
|
LOM Total / Avg.
|
Mining Cost (US$/t
Processed)
|
47.21
|
Processing Cost (US$/t
Processed) (incl. TSF)
|
21.96
|
G&A Cost (US$/t
Processed)
|
7.24
|
Total Operating Costs
(US$/t Processed)
|
76.40
|
Cash Costs (Co-Product
Basis) (US$/oz Ag)*
|
7.98
|
AISC (Co-Product Basis)
(US$/oz Ag)**
|
9.40
|
Capital Costs
|
LOM Total / Avg.
|
Initial Capital
(US$M)
|
223.6
|
Expansion Capital
(US$M)
|
11.1
|
Sustaining Capital
(US$M)
|
230.2
|
Closure Capital
(US$M)
|
31.8
|
Salvage Value
(US$M)
|
9.5
|
Financials
|
Pre-Tax
|
NPV (5%)
(US$M)
|
1,778
|
IRR (%)
|
124.1 %
|
Payback
(Years)
|
0.6
|
Financials
|
Post-Tax
|
NPV (5%)
(US$M)
|
1,137
|
IRR (%)
|
85.7 %
|
Payback
(Years)
|
0.8
|
Post-Tax NPV/Initial
Capital
|
5.1
|
* Total cash costs
consist of operating cash costs plus royalties and offsite
(refining & transport) charges
|
** AISC consist of
total cash costs plus sustaining capital
|
|
Table 1: Panuco PEA Detailed Parameters and Outputs
NPV remains positive for changes of +/-20% in revenue drivers
including metal prices, head grade, recovery, initial capital
expenditure and operating costs. After-tax economic sensitivities
are presented in Tables 2 and 3 below. Additional project
sensitivities will be presented in the Technical Report.
Inputs
|
Sensitivity Summary
Post-Tax NPV 5% (US$M)
|
(+/-%)
|
(20.0 %)
|
(10.0 %)
|
PEA
|
10.0 %
|
20.0 %
|
Metal
Price
|
$747
|
$942
|
$1,137
|
$1,333
|
$1,528
|
Head Grade
|
$732
|
$935
|
$1,137
|
$1,335
|
$1,531
|
Recovery
|
$751
|
$944
|
$1,137
|
$1,281
|
$1,288
|
Operating
Costs
|
$1,241
|
$1,189
|
$1,137
|
$1,086
|
$1,034
|
Initial
Capex
|
$1,185
|
$1,161
|
$1,137
|
$1,113
|
$1,089
|
Table 2: Sensitivity Summary Post Tax NPV 5% (US$M)
Inputs
|
Sensitivity Summary
Post-Tax IRR (%)
|
(+/-%)
|
(20.0 %)
|
(10.0 %)
|
PEA
|
10.0 %
|
20.0 %
|
Metal Price
|
62.9 %
|
74.6 %
|
85.7 %
|
96.3 %
|
106.5 %
|
Head Grade
|
60.9 %
|
73.6 %
|
85.7 %
|
96.4 %
|
106.7 %
|
Recovery
|
63.2 %
|
74.7 %
|
85.7 %
|
93.7 %
|
94.3 %
|
Operating
Costs
|
89.7 %
|
87.7 %
|
85.7 %
|
83.6 %
|
81.5 %
|
Initial
Capex
|
105.9 %
|
94.8 %
|
85.7 %
|
78.0 %
|
71.6 %
|
Table 3: Sensitivity Summary Post Tax IRR (%)
Mineral Resources
The MRE forms the basis for this PEA. The MRE is based on a
total drill database of 822 holes (302,931 metres) completed by
Vizsla Silver between November 2019
and September 2023.
Indicated mineral resources are estimated in the MRE at 9.5 Mt
grading 289 g/t silver, 2.41 g/t gold, 0.27% lead, and 0.84% zinc
(511 g/t AgEq). The MRE includes indicated mineral resources of
88.2 million ounces ("Moz") of silver, 736 koz of gold, 25.4
kt of lead, and 79.9 kt of zinc (155.8 Moz AgEq).
Inferred mineral resources are estimated in the MRE at 12.2 Mt
grading 239 g/t silver, 1.93 g/t gold, 0.29% lead, and 1.03% zinc
(433 g/t AgEq). The MRE includes inferred mineral resources of 93.7
Moz of silver, 758 koz of gold, 35.4 kt of lead, and 125.3 kt of
zinc (169.6 Moz AgEq).
Classification
|
Tonnes
|
Average
Grade
|
Contained
Metal
|
Ag
|
Au
|
Pb
|
Zn
|
AgEq
|
Au Eq
|
Ag
|
Au
|
Pb
|
Zn
|
AgEq
|
AuEq
|
(Mt)
|
(g/t)
|
(g/t)
|
( %)
|
( %)
|
(g/t)
|
(g/t)
|
(koz)
|
(koz)
|
(kt)
|
(kt)
|
(koz)
|
(koz)
|
Indicated
|
Copala
|
4.5
|
380
|
2.46
|
0.08
|
0.15
|
573
|
7.64
|
55,201
|
358
|
3.7
|
6.9
|
83,270
|
1,110
|
Tajitos
|
0.6
|
358
|
2.24
|
0.12
|
0.21
|
538
|
7.18
|
7,295
|
46
|
0.7
|
1.3
|
10,953
|
146
|
Cristiano
|
0.2
|
581
|
3.37
|
0.25
|
0.43
|
858
|
11.45
|
3,961
|
23
|
0.5
|
0.9
|
5,851
|
78
|
Copala Area
Total
|
5.4
|
385
|
2.48
|
0.09
|
0.17
|
580
|
7.74
|
66,457
|
427
|
5.0
|
9.2
|
100,074
|
1,343
|
Napoleon
|
3.3
|
162
|
2.39
|
0.52
|
1.73
|
425
|
5.66
|
17,276
|
255
|
17.2
|
57.4
|
45,223
|
603
|
Napoleon HW
|
0.4
|
164
|
1.72
|
0.42
|
1.53
|
365
|
4.87
|
2,259
|
24
|
1.8
|
6.5
|
5,029
|
67
|
Luisa
|
0.3
|
177
|
2.56
|
0.39
|
2.01
|
459
|
6.12
|
1556
|
22
|
1.1
|
5.5
|
4,027
|
54
|
Josephine
|
0.1
|
221
|
2.88
|
0.39
|
1.11
|
492
|
6.56
|
491
|
6
|
0.3
|
0.8
|
1,092
|
15
|
Cruz
|
0.0
|
144
|
2.01
|
0.37
|
1.71
|
373
|
4.97
|
153
|
2
|
0.1
|
0.6
|
396
|
5
|
NP Area
Total
|
4.1
|
164
|
2.34
|
0.50
|
1.72
|
421
|
5.66
|
21,735
|
309
|
20.4
|
70.7
|
55,767
|
743
|
Total
Indicated
|
9.5
|
289
|
2.41
|
0.27
|
0.84
|
511
|
6.81
|
88,192
|
736
|
25.4
|
79.9
|
155,841
|
2,076
|
Inferred
|
Copala
|
3.2
|
332
|
1.77
|
0.12
|
0.20
|
476
|
6.34
|
33,722
|
179
|
3.7
|
6.2
|
48,320
|
644
|
Tajitos
|
1.0
|
365
|
2.04
|
0.22
|
0.39
|
540
|
7.21
|
12,260
|
69
|
2.3
|
4.0
|
18,140
|
242
|
Cristiano
|
0.7
|
443
|
2.54
|
0.15
|
0.29
|
650
|
8.66
|
10,213
|
59
|
1.1
|
2.0
|
14,974
|
200
|
Copala Area
Total
|
4.9
|
355
|
1.94
|
0.15
|
0.25
|
515
|
6.86
|
56,195
|
307
|
7.1
|
12.3
|
81,434
|
1,081
|
Napoleon
|
3.2
|
137
|
1.64
|
0.45
|
1.76
|
342
|
4.57
|
14,045
|
168
|
14.4
|
55.9
|
35,063
|
467
|
Napoleon HW
|
0.8
|
220
|
2.17
|
0.59
|
2.02
|
479
|
6.39
|
5,976
|
59
|
5.0
|
17.0
|
13,027
|
174
|
La Luisa
|
2.0
|
159
|
2.13
|
0.30
|
1.51
|
386
|
5.15
|
10,439
|
139
|
6.0
|
30.8
|
25,326
|
338
|
Josephine
|
0.2
|
161
|
2.05
|
0.33
|
1.00
|
364
|
4.85
|
1161
|
15
|
0.7
|
2.2
|
2,618
|
35
|
Cruz
|
0.3
|
170
|
3.75
|
0.31
|
1.48
|
519
|
6.91
|
1698
|
37
|
1.0
|
4.6
|
5,169
|
69
|
NP Area
Total
|
6.6
|
157
|
1.97
|
0.41
|
1.68
|
383
|
5.10
|
33,319
|
418
|
27.1
|
110.6
|
81,203
|
1,082
|
San Antonio
|
0.3
|
226
|
1.30
|
0.01
|
0.03
|
325
|
4.33
|
2,038
|
12
|
0.0
|
0.1
|
2,936
|
39
|
*Animas
|
0.4
|
169
|
1.68
|
0.29
|
0.60
|
327
|
4.37
|
2,101
|
21
|
1.1
|
2.3
|
4,074
|
54
|
Total
Inferred
|
12.2
|
239
|
1.93
|
0.29
|
1.03
|
433
|
5.76
|
93,653
|
758
|
35.4
|
125.3
|
169,647
|
2,261
|
*Animas is Rosarito and
Cuevillas veins
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 4: Mineral Resources Reported at 150 g/t AgEq
cut-off (effective date September 01,
2023)
Capital and Operating Costs
The PEA estimates initial capital requirements of US$224 million and cumulative sustaining capital
of US$230 million. LOM operating
costs for Panuco are estimated to
average US$76.4 per tonne
processed.
Sustaining capital is expected to average approximately
US$21.6 million per year largely
attributable to continual mine development. In Year 3, with the
mill expansion and increase in underground development associated
with opening up the Napoleon Area veins, an expansion cost of
US$11.1 million is added (to be
funded through initial cash flows). The projected timing of
increases in capital expenditures in year 3 may be pushed further
into the future with continued exploration success along the
Copala structure.
The PEA is based on contractor underground mining, which has an
estimated LOM cost of US$47.21 per
tonne milled. Processing costs are estimated at US$21.96 per tonne milled, which includes TSF
handlings of US$0.33 per tonne
milled. G&A costs are estimated at US$7.24 per tonne milled.
The capital and operating cost estimate was developed in Q3 2024
United States Dollars (US$). The capital cost summary is presented
in Table 5 and the operating cost summary is presented in Table
6.
WBS Description
|
Initial Capital Cost
(US$M)
|
Sustaining Capital Cost
(US$M)
|
Expansion Cost
(US$M)
|
Total Cost
(US$M)
|
Mining
|
64.5
|
207.7
|
|
272.3
|
Process
Plant
|
63.2
|
|
7.2
|
70.4
|
Additional
Facilities
|
8.7
|
22.4
|
|
31.1
|
On-Site
Infrastructure
|
13.5
|
-
|
-
|
13.5
|
Off-Site
Infrastructure
|
0.8
|
-
|
-
|
0.8
|
Total
Directs
|
150.7
|
230.2
|
7.2
|
388.2
|
Project
Indirects
|
6.1
|
|
0.6
|
6.7
|
Project
Delivery
|
12.9
|
-
|
0.7
|
13.7
|
Total
Indirects
|
19.0
|
-
|
1.3
|
20.4
|
Owner's Cost
|
7.5
|
-
|
0.4
|
7.9
|
Provisions
(Contingency)
|
46.3
|
|
2.1
|
48.5
|
Closure (Incl.
Contingency)
|
-
|
31.8
|
-
|
31.8
|
Project
Totals
|
223.5
|
262.0
|
11.1
|
496.7
|
Table 5: Project Capital Cost Estimates (US$M) (totals may
differ due to rounding)
Cost Area
|
Average Annual Costs (US$M)
|
US$/t Processed
|
Mining
|
64.7
|
47.21
|
Process
|
29.7
|
21.96
|
G&A
|
9.9
|
7.24
|
Total
|
104.3
|
76.40
|
Table 6: Project Operating Cost Estimates (US$M) (totals may
differ due to rounding)
Mining
The Panuco Project is a collection of silver-gold deposits
located in the Panuco-Copala mining district in Sinaloa, Mexico, which extend from surface to
over 600 m in depth. The deposits
range in thickness from 1.5 m to
greater than 20 m.
Based on the characteristics of the deposit, long-hole stoping
("LHS") was selected as the primary mining method for all
deposits, with drift-and-fill ("DAF") selected for the
northern portion of the Copala North Zone which is located directly
under the Copala township. A
sublevel spacing of 20 m was selected
with variable stope strike lengths for LHS to be used dependant on
prevailing ground conditions, and 4 m
high DAF drifts (five lifts per sublevel).
The mining methods considered for the Panuco Project are
proposed to use a combination of cemented rock backfill
("CRF"), uncemented rock backfill, and paste backfill for
stope support.
For the preliminary design of the Panuco Project, planned
dilution and unplanned rock dilution were accounted for using the
Datamine Mineable Shape Optimiser® ("MSO"). Mineralized and
unmineralized dilution within MSO was estimated at 52.8% and
additional unplanned dilution from backfill dilution, stope
development and DAF mining was estimated at 9.2%. Mining recovery
of 92% for LHS and 98% for DAF was applied as a factor to the
shapes created by MSO within the production schedule.
A Net Smelter Return ("NSR") model was used to estimate
the revenue of the mineralized material. Preliminary process
recoveries, doré grades, smelting and refining terms, and
transportation costs were assumed to determine the NSR value. A
Cut-Off Value ("COV") was used to flag material by whether
the revenue in a block exceeds the costs of extraction and
processing of that block. There were three COVs used to assess
mining at Panuco: An Elevated COV,
a Fully Costed COV and the Marginal COV.
The Fully Costed COV represents the break-even value of
mineralized material required to cover all the associated operating
and sustaining capital costs of extraction and processing. Fully
costed COVs were assumed for Panuco at US$
106.6/t for LHS and US$
120.7/t for DAF. The Elevated COV of US$200/t was considered during the pre-production
period and the first two years of processing. The Marginal COV of
US$22/t was assumed when the
operation has committed to development and preparation of stoping
blocks. The Marginal COV includes the assumption that the material
value exceeds the costs of the incremental haulage, surface
handling, processing, and G&A.
Due to the distance between the various geological deposits, the
Panuco Project is separated into two separate underground mines.
The Copala Mine, the larger of the two, accesses the Copala, Cristiano, and Tajitos deposits. The Napoleon Mine which is
located to the west of the Copala Mine accesses the Napoleon, La
Luisa, Cruz Negra, and Josephine
deposits.
Contractor mining is currently proposed for the Panuco Project
to minimize upfront capital and achieve higher productivity.
Period
|
Waste
|
Development
|
Stoping
|
Total
Mineralized
Material
|
Total Mined
Material
|
kt
|
kt
|
kt
|
kt
|
kt
|
YEAR
TOTAL
|
4,974.9
|
2,847.7
|
11,759.1
|
14,606.8
|
19,581.7
|
Y-02
|
226.9
|
26.3
|
-
|
26.3
|
253.2
|
Y-01
|
177.8
|
226.3
|
182.5
|
408.8
|
586.5
|
Y01
|
497.7
|
193.7
|
596.7
|
790.4
|
1,288.1
|
Y02
|
710.7
|
169.5
|
1,115.6
|
1,285.1
|
1,995.8
|
Y03
|
697.0
|
231.2
|
1,166.2
|
1,397.5
|
2,094.4
|
Y04
|
573.8
|
336.5
|
1,212.6
|
1,549.1
|
2,122.9
|
Y05
|
401.6
|
395.5
|
1,130.7
|
1,526.2
|
1,927.8
|
Y06
|
477.0
|
369.4
|
1,035.1
|
1,404.4
|
1,881.5
|
Y07
|
534.5
|
354.9
|
1,026.3
|
1,381.2
|
1,915.8
|
Y08
|
491.7
|
387.9
|
1,023.7
|
1,411.7
|
1,903.4
|
Y09
|
186.2
|
155.8
|
1,243.8
|
1,399.6
|
1,585.8
|
Y10
|
-
|
0.6
|
1,403.4
|
1,404.0
|
1,404.0
|
Y11
|
-
|
-
|
622.5
|
622.5
|
622.5
|
Table 7: Total and Annual Material Movement Schedule
for the Panuco Project
Processing and Metallurgy
Three rounds of metallurgical test work have been completed to
date by Vizsla Silver on the main deposits for the Panuco Project
dating back to 2021. Flowsheet development, undertaken by Ausenco
using samples from the Napoleon, Tajitos and Copala deposits has focused on comminution
testing, Drop Weight tests, bond ball tests, mineralogical
assessments, froth flotation tests, cyanide leach and whole feed
leaching as well as extrapolation of a primary grind size of 70µm
P80. Based on the envisioned circuit and corresponding
laboratory test response, the overall process recoveries based on
the samples tested for all deposits were indicated to be roughly
85-92% Ag and 90-94% Au after 96 hours of leach residence time. The
PEA assumes LOM average recoveries of 92.2% for silver and 93.8%
for gold. Ongoing test work continues to highlight improved
recoveries.
The PEA envisages a two phased approach to mill development.
Phase 1, with an initial throughput of 3,300 tpd, assumes
run-of-mine ("ROM") material is crushed and screened before
grinding using a ball mill. The ground material reports to the
leach circuit for a total of 96 hours. Discharge from the whole ore
leaching tank will gravitate to the counter current decantation
("CCD") circuit where leached solids will be cleaned of
pregnant solution through a series of counter-current decantation
thickeners to facilitate extraction and recovery of silver and gold
by cyanide leach - Merrill Crowe process and refining to doré bars.
Part of the plant tailings is distributed to the paste plant and
the rest is deposited onto a wet tailings storage facility.
In Phase 2, the process plant expands to process 4,000 tpd and a
flotation and concentrate leaching circuit is introduced to the
flowsheet to support improved recoveries from Year 4.
Project Enhancement Opportunities
The PEA demonstrates that Panuco has the potential to become a
commercially robust project. Additional opportunities to enhance
Project value include:
- Continued exploration and infill drilling for conversion of
Inferred Mineral Resources to the Measured and Indicated
categories.
- Mine scheduling investigations allowing for the further
optimization of blending scenarios.
- Supplementary metallurgical optimizations including
deposit-wide variability testing and host rock
characterization.
- Optimization of the flotation recovery and concentrate quality
as well as the leach-Merrill Crowe process.
- Further optimization of tailings and water management
infrastructure, including surface geotechnical site investigations,
laboratory testing, physical waste characterization, water balance
modelling, and engineering studies.
Next Steps (Feasibility Study and Test Mine)
With the PEA completed, Vizsla Silver is moving forward with a
feasibility study for the Panuco Project (the "Feasibility
Study"). The Company is targeting completion of the Feasibility
Study in the second half of 2025 and intends to make a production
decision only following the release of a positive Feasibility
Study. There are currently two drill rigs focused on infill
drilling to upgrade inferred resources into the indicated category
and indicated resources to the measured category, for inclusion in
the Feasibility Study reserves.
The fully funded and permitted bulk sample test-mine will
commence at Copala in the fourth
quarter of 2024. Access to high-grade mineralization at
Copala will allow us to conduct
detailed feasibility work including reconciling underground grades
with the resource model, assess geotechnical conditions, determine
more accurate development costs, complete test mining to define the
optimum mining method and stockpile high-grade mineralization on
surface for plant commissioning.
Qualified Persons
In accordance with NI 43-101, Jesus
Velador, Ph.D. MMSA QP., Vice President of Exploration, is
the Qualified Person for the Company and has reviewed and approved
the technical and scientific content of this news release.
Additionally, a team of independent Qualified Persons (as such
term is defined under NI 43-101) at Ausenco, Entech and SGS have
led the PEA and have reviewed and verified the technical disclosure
in this press release, including:
- Peter Mehrfert, P.Eng., of Ausenco is an independent Qualified
Person responsible for process and recovery methods, market studies
and contracts and economic analysis in the PEA.
- James Millard, P.Geo., of Ausenco is an independent Qualified
Person responsible for the environmental and permitting studies in
the PEA.
- Allan Armitage, P.Eng., FEC, CET., of SGS is an independent
Qualified Person responsible for the Property description and
location, mineral resource estimate and discussion of adjacent
properties in the PEA.
- Ramon Mendoza, P.Eng., of Entech is an independent Qualified
Person responsible for the mining methods and mining cost
estimation in the PEA.
- Ben Eggers, P. Geo of SGS is an independent Qualified Person
responsible for the history, regional geology, exploration and
drilling and sampling work in the PEA.
About Vizsla Silver and the Panuco Project
Vizsla Silver's flagship Panuco
project is host to a high-grade epithermal silver-gold deposit
which has been the subject of the PEA with an effective date of
July 24, 2024, and a Mineral Resource
Estimate1 on the Panuco Property with an effective date
of September 01, 2023. The Mineral
Resource Estimate is centered on the western portion of
Panuco, encompassing ~8 km of the
known 86km of cumulative vein strike in the district. The Mineral
Resource Estimate includes 178 infill/expansion holes (100,222
metres) completed by Vizsla Silver between September 2022 and September 2023. In total, the Mineral Resource
Estimate is based on a total drill database of 822 holes (302,931
metres) completed by Vizsla Silver since November 2019 (please refer to the Technical
Report on Updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Panuco
Ag-Au-Pb-Zn Project, Sinaloa State, Mexico, by Allan Armitage, Ben Eggers and
Peter Mehrfert, dated February 12,
2024 and to the Company´s press release dated January 8, 2024).
- Indicated: 9.48 Mt grading 289 g/t silver, 2.41 g/t gold, 0.27%
lead, and 0.84% zinc (511 AgEq). The current MRE includes indicated
mineral resources of 88.2 Moz of silver, 736 koz of gold, 56 Mlbs
of lead, and 176 Mlbs of zinc (155.8 Moz AgEq).
- Inferred: 12.19 Mt grading 239 g/t silver, 1.93 g/t gold, 0.29%
lead, and 1.03% zinc (433 g/t AgEq). The current MRE includes
inferred mineral resources of 93.7 Moz of silver, 758 koz of gold,
78 Mlbs of lead, and 276 Mlbs of zinc (169.6 Moz AgEq).
About Ausenco
Ausenco is a global diversified engineering, environmental,
construction and project management company providing consulting,
project delivery and asset management solutions to the resources,
energy, and infrastructure sectors. Ausenco's experience in
poly-metallic projects ranges from conceptual, pre-feasibility and
feasibility studies for new project developments to project
execution with EPCM delivery. Ausenco is currently engaged on
several global projects with similar characteristics and to the
Panuco Project.
Information Concerning Estimates of Mineral Resources
The scientific and technical information in this news release
was prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 which differs
significantly from the requirements of the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). The terms "measured mineral
resource", "indicated mineral resource" and "inferred mineral
resource" used herein are in reference to the mining terms defined
in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
Standards (the "CIM Definition Standards"), which
definitions have been adopted by NI 43-101. Accordingly,
information contained herein providing descriptions of our mineral
deposits in accordance with NI 43-101 may not be comparable to
similar information made public by other U.S. companies subject to
the United States federal
securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.
You are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral
resources will ever be converted into reserves. Pursuant to CIM
Definition Standards, "inferred mineral resources" are that part of
a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality are
estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and sampling.
Such geological evidence is sufficient to imply but not verify
geological and grade or quality continuity. An inferred mineral
resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an
indicated mineral resource and must not be converted to a mineral
reserve. However, it is reasonably expected that the majority of
inferred mineral resources could be upgraded to indicated mineral
resources with continued exploration. Under Canadian rules,
estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of
feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases.
Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an
inferred mineral resource is economically or legally mineable.
Disclosure of "contained ounces" in a resource is permitted
disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the SEC normally
only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not
constitute "reserves" by SEC standards as in place tonnage and
grade without reference to unit measures.
Canadian standards, including the CIM Definition Standards and
NI 43-101, differ significantly from standards in the SEC Industry
Guide 7. Effective February 25, 2019,
the SEC adopted new mining disclosure rules under subpart 1300 of
Regulation S-K of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the "SEC Modernization Rules"), with compliance
required for the first fiscal year beginning on or after
January 1, 2021. The SEC
Modernization Rules replace the historical property disclosure
requirements included in SEC Industry Guide 7. As a result of the
adoption of the SEC Modernization Rules, the SEC now recognizes
estimates of "measured mineral resources", "indicated mineral
resources" and "inferred mineral resources". Information regarding
mineral resources contained or referenced herein may not be
comparable to similar information made public by companies that
report according to U.S. standards. While the SEC Modernization
Rules are purported to be "substantially similar" to the CIM
Definition Standards, readers are cautioned that there are
differences between the SEC Modernization Rules and the CIM
Definitions Standards. Accordingly, there is no assurance any
mineral resources that the Company may report as "measured mineral
resources", "indicated mineral resources" and "inferred mineral
resources" under NI 43-101 would be the same had the Company
prepared the resource estimates under the standards adopted under
the SEC Modernization Rules.
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services
Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture
Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of
this release.
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This news release includes certain "Forward–Looking Statements"
within the meaning of the United States Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and "forward–looking information"
under applicable Canadian securities laws. When used in this news
release, the words "anticipate", "believe", "estimate", "expect",
"target", "plan", "forecast", "may", "would", "could", "schedule"
and similar words or expressions, identify forward–looking
statements or information. These forward–looking statements or
information relate to, among other things: the exploration,
development, and production at Panuco, the highlights of the PEA, the
publication of the Technical Report, enhancement opportunities at
the Panuco Project, and next steps at Panuco including the completion of the
Feasibility Study and test mining.
Forward–looking statements and forward–looking information
relating to any future mineral production, liquidity, enhanced
value and capital markets profile of Vizsla Silver, future growth
potential for Vizsla Silver and its business, and future
exploration plans are based on management's reasonable assumptions,
estimates, expectations, analyses and opinions, which are based on
management's experience and perception of trends, current
conditions and expected developments, and other factors that
management believes are relevant and reasonable in the
circumstances, but which may prove to be incorrect. Assumptions
have been made regarding, among other things, the price of silver,
gold, and other metals; costs of exploration and development; the
estimated costs of development of exploration projects; Vizsla
Silver's ability to operate in a safe and effective manner and its
ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms.
These statements reflect Vizsla Silver's respective current
views with respect to future events and are necessarily based upon
a number of other assumptions and estimates that, while considered
reasonable by management, are inherently subject to significant
business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties
and contingencies. Many factors, both known and unknown, could
cause actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially
different from the results, performance or achievements that are or
may be expressed or implied by such forward–looking statements or
forward-looking information and Vizsla Silver has made assumptions
and estimates based on or related to many of these factors. Such
factors include, without limitation: the Company's dependence on
one mineral project; precious metals price volatility; risks
associated with the conduct of the Company's mining activities in
Mexico; regulatory, consent or
permitting delays; risks relating to reliance on the Company's
management team and outside contractors; risks regarding mineral
resources and reserves; the Company's inability to obtain insurance
to cover all risks, on a commercially reasonable basis or at all;
currency fluctuations; risks regarding the failure to generate
sufficient cash flow from operations; risks relating to project
financing and equity issuances; risks and unknowns inherent in all
mining projects, including the inaccuracy of reserves and
resources, metallurgical recoveries and capital and operating costs
of such projects; contests over title to properties, particularly
title to undeveloped properties; laws and regulations governing the
environment, health and safety; operating or technical difficulties
in connection with mining or development activities; employee
relations, labour unrest or unavailability; the Company's
interactions with surrounding communities and artisanal miners; the
Company's ability to successfully integrate acquired assets; the
speculative nature of exploration and development, including the
risks of diminishing quantities or grades of reserves; stock market
volatility; conflicts of interest among certain directors and
officers; lack of liquidity for shareholders of the Company;
litigation risk; and the factors identified under the caption "Risk
Factors" in Vizsla Silver's management discussion and analysis.
Readers are cautioned against attributing undue certainty to
forward–looking statements or forward-looking information. Although
Vizsla Silver has attempted to identify important factors that
could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other
factors that cause results not to be anticipated, estimated or
intended. Vizsla Silver does not intend, and does not assume any
obligation, to update these forward–looking statements or
forward-looking information to reflect changes in assumptions or
changes in circumstances or any other events affecting such
statements or information, other than as required by applicable
law.
View original content to download
multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/vizsla-silver-delivers-exceptional-economics-for-panuco-in-preliminary-economic-assessment-302204999.html
SOURCE Vizsla Silver Corp.