NEWS RELEASE | 31 January
2025
Quarterly Report December 2024
Summary:
·
Exploration at
Conchas Project
Subsequent to the end of the
quarter, Berkeley Energia Limited (Berkeley or Company) announced the results of the
recent reverse circulation (RC) and diamond drilling program
completed at the Conchas project (Conchas Project), as part of its
ongoing exploration initiative targeting critical minerals in
Spain. Highlights included:
· Assay results
demonstrate shallow, thick zones of lithium and rubidium
mineralisation, hosted within a muscovitic leucogranite,
intersected in all 33 RC holes.
|
· Drill
intercepts include:
|
o 14m
@ 0.95% Li2O & 0.39% Rb2O (from
40m)
|
o 18m
@ 0.55% Li2O & 0.23% Rb2O (from
surface)
|
o 61m
@ 0.50% Li2O & 0.21% Rb2O (from
surface)
|
o 27m
@ 0.44% Li2O & 0.21% Rb2O (from
surface)
|
o 56m
@ 0.48% Li2O & 0.21% Rb2O (from
surface)
|
· Samples
collected from an additional three diamond holes completed in the
drill program have been sent for preliminary metallurgical test
work with results anticipated in the current quarter.
|
· Next steps include
3D modelling of the drilling data and completion of the preliminary
metallurgical test work program.
|
·
Rubidium is a critical raw material for advanced
technology and industrial applications used in key sectors
including defence and military, aerospace, communications, medical
and renewable energy. The U.S. and Japan have both classified
rubidium as a Critical Mineral due to its strategic importance and
growing demand in high-tech applications.
|
·
International
Arbitration against Spain
In May 2024, Berkeley advised that
its wholly owned subsidiary, Berkeley Exploration Limited
(BEL), had filed a Request
for Arbitration (Request)
for its investments in Spain through its Spanish subsidiary,
Berkeley Minera España SA (BME), initiating arbitration
proceedings against the Kingdom of Spain (Spain) before the International Centre
for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID).
As part of its Request, BEL alleges
that Spain's actions against BME and the Salamanca project
(Salamanca Project) have
violated multiple provisions of the Energy Charter Treaty
(ECT), and that BEL is
seeking preliminary compensation in the order of US$1 billion
(US$1,000,000,000) for these violations.
During the quarter, the Registration
of the Arbitration was published on the ICSID website and the
proceedings advanced to the current phase which involves tribunal
members being selected and appointed, thereby formally establishing
the tribunal.
Notwithstanding the investment
dispute, BEL remains committed to the Salamanca Project and
continues to be open to a constructive dialogue with Spain. BEL is
ready and open to collaborate with the relevant Spanish authorities
to find an amicable resolution to the permitting situation and
remains hopeful discussions can take place in the near
term.
·
Global Nuclear
Power and Uranium Market:
The uranium spot price weakened
during the quarter and closed down at US$73 per pound. The two
longer term uranium price indicators also weakened in the quarter
as the 3-yr Forward price decreased to US$88.00 per pound while the
5-yr Forward Price declined to US$95 per pound. The Long-Term Price
remained fairly stable at US$79.00 per pound.
The outlook for nuclear power and
the uranium market continued to strengthen during and subsequent to
the end of the quarter, with a number of important recent
developments, including:
· Spain -
Demonstrations
o According to figures from Spain's Civil Guard, approximately
7,000 people attended a demonstration against the planned closure
of the Almaraz nuclear power plant in Extremadura as part of the
country's nuclear phase-out policy.
The demonstration was called by the
municipalities in the area of influence of the Almaraz nuclear
power plant and the citizens' platform "Yes to Almaraz, Yes to the
Future" to demand the continuation of the activity of the
Extremadura plant in light of the closure planned by the central
government.
The Mayor of Almaraz was quoted as
saying the nuclear plant is the "most necessary industry in
Extremadura", while insisting that "not a minute can be wasted in
defending its continuity [if you want to avoid job loss and
increased depopulation]." "Today the fight
begins, and I ask the Government of the nation to rectify it,
because it is brave to recognise mistakes," the Mayor said about
the plant.
· Spain - Nuclear Power Plant
Continuation
o One
of Spain's nuclear operators, said it has received notification of
the ministerial order extending the operating permit for the Trillo
nuclear power plant until November 2034. The Ministry for
Ecological Transition and the Demographic Challenge (MITECO) had considered the favourable
report issued on by the Nuclear Safety Council (NSC) in its decision to grant the
operating extension.
· Google
o Google and Kairos Power, a nuclear technology, engineering and
manufacturing company focused on commercialisation of the fluoride
salt-cooled, high-temperature reactor, executed a Master Plant
Development Agreement for the deployment of advanced nuclear power
projects totalling 500 MW by 2035.
· Amazon
o Amazon agreed to anchor a Series C-1 financing round of
~US$500 million to support the completion of X-energy's reactor
design and licensing, as well as fund the first phase of the
TRISO-X fuel fabrication facility. In addition, the two companies
are collaborating to bring more than 5 GW of new power projects
online across the U.S. by 2029.
· Facebook
o Facebook owner Meta seeks up to 4 GW nuclear capacity. Meta is
the latest tech company to seek nuclear as an energy source for its
growing data needs as it seeks proposals for as much as 4 GW of
nuclear capacity in the U.S. by the early 2030s.
· U.S.
o Constellation Energy (Constellation) will supply U.S. federal
sector nuclear power under a record contract. The ten-year, US$840
million contract to supply electricity to 13 federal facilities is
the first-ever long-term multi-agency purchase of electricity by
the U.S. General Services Administration, and will support licence
extensions and capacity uprates at Constellation's nuclear
plants.
o Constellation will also sell the power to Microsoft, for its
artificial intelligence (AI) data centres as part of a 20-year
power deal with the tech company. Constellation plans to invest
US$1.6 billion to restart a reactor for this purpose.
· Russia
o In
November 2024, the Russian Federation government passed a decree
rescinding TENEX's (Russian nuclear fuel export agency) general
license to export low enriched uranium (LEU) to the U.S, effective through
December 2025; reportedly in retaliation for the U.S. legislation
signed into law (H.R. 1042 "Prohibiting Russian Uranium Imports
Act"; August 2024). This decree bans the importation of
Russian-sourced LEU subject to U.S. Department of Energy waivers,
which may be granted through December 2027 when the ban will be
fully enforced.
TENEX is now required to apply for
specific export licenses issued by the Federal Service for
Technical and Export Control, which may be on a case-by-case basis
under the current suspension.
· International Atomic Energy
Agency (IAEA)
o IAEA
published a new report, Climate Change and Nuclear Power 2024,
which focused on the financial requirements to pursue increased
nuclear power capacity. The report concluded that in order to reach
the 2050 high case nuclear capacity forecast (2.5 times current
global nuclear capacity) contained in the agency's recent
projection, the annual global investment in nuclear power reactor
maintenance and new build would need to increase from the average
of US$50 billion/year experienced 2017-2023, up to US$125
billion/year. Tripling current nuclear capacity would necessitate
annual investment of US$150 billion.
· United Nations Climate Change
Conference (COP29)
o COP29 convened in Baku, Azerbaijan during November 2024. The
IAEA reported that nuclear power was highlighted during the
gathering observing that "Reaching global decarbonisation targets
by 2050 will require a significant expansion of nuclear power."
During the international conference, an additional six countries
added their support to the Declaration to Triple Nuclear Energy,
bringing the total to 31 signatory countries.
·
Balance
Sheet
The Company is in a strong financial
position with A$79 million in cash reserves and no debt.
Classification: 2.2 This announcement contains inside
information
For
further information please contact:
Robert
Behets
Francisco
Bellón
Acting Managing
Director
Chief Operations Officer
+61 8 9322
6322
+34 923 193 903
info@berkeleyenergia.com
Salamanca Project Summary
The Salamanca Project is being
developed in a historic uranium mining area in Western Spain about
three hours west of Madrid.
The Company has received more than
120 European Union and National level approvals and favourable
reports required for the initial development of the project to
date.
The project has the potential to
generate measurable social and environmental benefits in the form
of jobs and skills training in a depressed rural community. It can
also make a significant contribution to the security of supply of
Europe's zero carbon energy needs.
The Project hosts a Mineral Resource
of 89.3Mlb uranium, with more than two thirds in the Measured and
Indicated categories. In 2016, Berkeley published the results of a
robust Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) for Salamanca confirming that the
Project could be one of the world's lowest cost producers, capable
of generating strong after-tax cash flows.
Figure 1:
Location of the
Salamanca Project, Spain
Salamanca Project Update
During the quarter, the Company
continued with its commitment to health, safety and the environment
as a priority.
External audits of the Company's
Environmental Management System according to ISO 14001 Standards,
and Sustainable Mining Management System according to UNE 22470/80
Standards, were completed by independent consultant AENOR during
the quarter. No non-compliance issues were identified during the
audit and the final report noted that BME continues to improve its
climate change and sustainability processes. AENOR concluded that
the Environmental Management System and Sustainable Mining
Management System meet the requirements of the Standards and the
audit criteria.
The Company was also certified under
the ISO 45001:2023 its Occupational Health and Safety Management
System during the quarter. The Company has as one of its
fundamental pillars the search for excellence in the execution of
its activities, which go beyond strict regulatory compliance. In
the past the Company was certified in OSHA:18001 for the Health and
Safety Management System but has now obtained certification under
ISO 45001:2023, its successor, which demonstrates the Company's
commitment to continuous improvement. The certificate has been
issued by AENOR.
Regarding CO2 footprint,
the Company submitted all the required documentation for the
Registration of Berkeley's Carbon Footprint for 2023 to MITECO. The
objective of this registration is to get the "Calculo y Reduzco"
("I measure and reduce") stamp for 2023.
Exploration
During the quarter, the Company
continued with its exploration program focusing on critical
minerals in Spain. The exploration initiative is targeting lithium,
rubidium, tin, tantalum, niobium, tungsten, and other battery and
critical metals, within the Company's existing tenements in western
Spain that do not form part of Berkeley's main undertaking being
the development of the Salamanca Project.
Conchas
Project
The Investigation Permit
(IP) Conchas is located in
the very western part of the Salamanca province, close to the
Portuguese border (Figure 2). The tenement covers an area of
~31km2 in the western part of the Ciudad Rodrigo Basin
and is largely covered by Cenozoic aged sediments. Only the
north-western part of the tenement is uncovered and dominated by
the Guarda Batholith intrusion. The tenement hosts a number of
sites where small-scale historical tin and tungsten mining was
undertaken. In addition, several mineral occurrences (tin,
tungsten, titanium, lithium) have been identified during historical
mapping and stream sediment sampling programs.
Figure 2: IP Conchas
Location Plans and Geology / Drill Hole Location
Plan
Billiton PLC undertook exploration
on the IP Conchas between 1981 and 1983, with a focus on tin and
tantalum (lithium, rubidium and other elements were not taken into
account). Billiton's work programs comprised regional and detailed
geological mapping, geochemistry, trenching and limited
drilling.
Soil sampling programs completed by
Berkeley in the northern and central portions of the tenement
during 2021 (200m by 200m) and 2022 (100m by 100m) defined a
tin-lithium anomaly covering approximately 1.1km by 0.7km which
correlated with a mapped aplo-pegmatitic leucogranite.
Based on the results of the soil
sampling programs and information gleaned from a review of the
available historical data, a small initial drilling program was
implemented in 2022 to test the tin-lithium anomaly.
The drill program comprised five
broad spaced RC holes for a total of 282m. Anomalous results for
lithium (Li), tin (Sn), rubidium (Rb), cesium (Cs), niobium (Nb)
and tantalum (Ta) obtained from multi-element analysis of drill
samples were reported in April 2023, demonstrating Conchas'
exploration potential for several critical and strategic raw
materials included in the European Commission's Critical Raw
Materials Act (CRMA). The
drill results included 25m @ 0.56% Li2O and 0.22%
Rb2O from surface (CCR0002).
The occurrence of these six elements
is observed to be largely associated with a sub-horizontal
muscovitic leucogranite unit that locally outcrops at surface. The
muscovitic leucogranite has a mapped extent of approximately 2km
(in a NE-SW orientation) by 1.2km (on average in a NW-SE
orientation) (Figure 2) and varies in thickness from 7m to over
170m in the drill holes (Figure 3).
A number of mineralogical studies
have been undertaken to determine the mineral species present and
understand their characteristics and properties. Results of these
studies indicate the mineralised muscovitic leucogranite is
composed mainly of plagioclase (average content of 55%) and quartz
(average content of 25%), with potassium feldspar, muscovite mica,
and Li-mica making up remainder of the rock. The samples have an
average Li-mica content of 3%.
2024 Drilling
Program
A follow-up RC and diamond core
drilling program focused on improving confidence in the geology,
continuity, and grade distribution of the zone of multi-element
mineralisation was completed in late 2024. The drilling program
comprised 33 RC holes for 1,857m drilled on a 100m by 100m grid,
with depths ranging from 16m to a maximum of 169m. In addition,
three diamond core holes for 230m were drilled to collect samples
for metallurgical test work purposes.
All drill holes intersected
muscovitic leucogranite hosted mineralisation, confirming and
improving upon the results obtained in the 2022 drilling campaign.
Select intercepts include:
Hole No.
|
Down Hole
Intercept
|
From Depth
(Down Hole)
|
CCR006
|
27m @
0.44% Li2O &
0.21% Rb2O
14m @
0.95% Li2O &
0.39% Rb2O
|
surface
40m
|
CCR011
|
55m @
0.31% Li2O &
0.18% Rb2O
|
surface
|
CCR012
|
61m
@ 0.50% Li2O &
0.21% Rb2O
|
surface
|
CCR017
|
18m @
0.55% Li2O &
0.23% Rb2O
|
surface
|
CCR025
|
56m @
0.48% Li2O &
0.21% Rb2O
|
surface
|
CCR033
|
19m @
0.35% Li2O &
0.21% Rb2O
|
surface
|
Based on geological logging of all
drill holes and the assay results returned from the RC holes, the
following observations were made regarding geology, continuity, and
grade distribution:
· the
mineralised muscovite leucogranite is very homogeneous in terms of
mineralogy
· the
distribution of Rb mineralisation is the most consistent among all
anomalous elements within the zone of mineralisation
· there
is a strong positive correlation between Li and Rb grades, which
may be associated with the varying presence of micas
· there
is a positive correlation between Nb and Ta grades, which appears
to be associated with the presence of columbo-tantalite and/or
cassiterite
· the
southern zone of mineralisation contains the highest grades
overall, with individual assay values exceeding 2.5%
Li2O. In this area, all holes penetrated the host
muscovitic leucogranite and ended in the underlying regional
granite (Figure 3)
· In the
northeast, the muscovite leucogranite is significantly thicker
(>169m in CCR020) and all holes returned Rb2O grades
exceeding 1,000ppm (Figure 4) however, Li2O grades are
lower than in the south and northwest areas
· None
of the northeastern most holes reached the underlying regional
granite, suggesting a potential feeder zone
· Drilling in the northwest recorded the highest grades of both
Li2O and Rb2O, as well as the highest grades
of other elements
Surface geological mapping was also
conducted as part of the recent exploration activities. Based on
field observations, the surface area occupied by the muscovitic
leucogranite is greater than indicated by historical mapping, which
when combined with the drilling results, expands the scale of the
host unit.
Figure 3: IP Conchas
4,492,225 North Cross Section
Figure 4: IP Conchas
4,492,925 North Cross Section
Next Steps
Representative samples obtained from
the three diamond core holes drilled in the 2024 program have been
sent to the Oviedo School of Mines' laboratory for preliminary
metallurgical test work.
The metallurgical testwork program
has been designed to assess the potential recovery of Li, Rb and
the other elements of economic interest, and will comprise crushing
and grinding (bond index calculation), gravity (jigs, shaking
tables and multi gravity separator), high intensity wet and dry
magnetic separation on the concentrates, froth flotation, and
characterisation of the samples.
3D modelling of the drilling data
will also be undertaken to refine the geological interpretation and
assess volumes, average grades and grade distributions for the Li
and Rb mineralisation at different cut-offs.
Rubidium1,2,3,4,5
Rubidium is a critical raw material
with growing significance in advanced technology and industrial
applications, including in the defence and military, aerospace,
communications, biomedical and renewable energy sectors.
Its unique properties make it
indispensable for producing special crystals used in night-vision
equipment and fibre-optic telecommunications systems. Other
applications include precision timekeeping in atomic clocks, which
are vital for global positioning systems (GPS), telecommunications, and space
exploration.
Rubidium compounds play a key role
in the production of specialty glasses, cutting-edge electronics,
radiation detection devices and medical imaging technologies,
ensuring their relevance across multiple high-growth
sectors.
Specialty glasses, currently the
largest market for rubidium, are utilised in night vision equipment
and fibre-optic telecommunications systems. Rubidium carbonate is
used as an additive to these types of glass, lowering electrical
conductivity and improving stability and durability.
Rubidium's photo-emissive properties
lead to its application in motion-sensor devices, night-vision
devices, photoelectric cells, and photomultiplier tubes. These
applications highlight its importance in advanced electronic
devices, particularly in sectors requiring precision and
reliability.
Its application in photocells, which
convert light into electric currents, is significant. These
photocells are primarily used as sensors to regulate lighting in
buildings, showcasing rubidium's role in energy-efficient
technologies.
Rubidium-based atomic clocks are
used in military communication systems, navigation equipment, and
precision-guided weapons. The increasing focus on defence
modernisation and the need for secure and reliable communication
systems are expected to drive the demand for rubidium in the
military sector.
Rubidium is also increasingly used
as a key component in advanced batteries, particularly in the
development of high-energy-density batteries for electric vehicles
and renewable energy applications.
Global production of rubidium is
limited, with no rubidium production recorded globally outside of
China in 2023.
Due to its strategic importance and
growing demand in high-tech applications used in key industry
sectors, the United States of America and Japan have both
classified rubidium as a Critical Mineral, essential to their
economic or national security, and with a supply chain vulnerable
to disruption.
Oliva and La Majada
Projects
These projects comprise three
tenements within two project areas in Spain which are considered
prospective for tungsten, cobalt, antimony, and other
metals.
The Company has designed exploration
programs for both projects, communicated with the relevant
authorities and conducted the required studies e.g. a birdlife
study at the La Majada Project, to progress the pending grant of
the IPs for two of the tenements.
The birdlife study at the La Majada
Project has been completed and the Exploration Program is currently
being updated to align it to new legislation recently introduced
for the Castilla La Mancha Region. This documentation will be
submitted to the relevant authorities in the coming
quarter.
International Arbitration Dispute
In May 2024, the Company's wholly
owned subsidiary, Berkeley Exploration
Limited (BEL), filed a
Request for Arbitration (Request) for its investments in Spain
through its Spanish subsidiary, Berkeley Minera España SA
(BME), initiating
arbitration proceedings against the Kingdom of Spain (Spain) before International Centre for
Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID).
As part of its Request, BEL alleges
that Spain's actions against BME and the Salamanca Project have
violated multiple provisions of the Energy Charter Treaty
(ECT), and that BEL is
seeking preliminary compensation in the order of US$1 billion
(US$1,000,000,000) for these violations.
In November 2022, BEL submitted a
written notification of an investment dispute to the Prime Minister
of Spain and the MITECO informing them of the nature of the dispute
and the ECT breaches, and that it proposed to seek prompt
negotiations for an amicable solution pursuant to article 26.1 of
the ECT. The Spanish government has not engaged in any discussions
related to the dispute to date, and BEL filed its Request in order
to enforce its rights at the Salamanca Project through
international arbitration.
The Request was jointly submitted by
specialist teams at Herbert Smith Freehills Spain LLP and Riano
Abogados (previously LCS Abogados) who are representing BEL in the
arbitration proceedings.
BEL has received the Notice of
Registration from ICSID, and during the quarter, the Registration
of the Arbitration was published on the ICSID website. The
proceedings have now advanced to the current phase which involves
tribunal members being selected and appointed, thereby formally
establishing the tribunal.
Notwithstanding the investment
dispute, BEL remains committed to the Salamanca Project and
continues to be open to a constructive dialogue with Spain. BEL is
ready and open to collaborate with the relevant Spanish authorities
to find an amicable resolution to the permitting situation and
remains hopeful discussions can take place in the near
term.
Background to Dispute
In April 2021, the Spanish
Government approved an amendment to the draft climate change and
energy transition bill relating to the investigation and
exploitation of radioactive minerals (e.g. uranium). The Government
reviewed and approved the amendment to Article 10 under which: (i)
new applications for exploration, investigation and direct
exploitation concessions for radioactive materials, and their
extensions, would not be accepted following the entry into force of
this law; and (ii) existing concessions, and open proceedings and
applications related to these, would continue as per normal based
on the previous legislation. The new law was published in the
Official Spanish State Gazette and came into effect in May
2021.
The Company's wholly owned
subsidiary, BME, currently holds legal, valid and consolidated
rights for the investigation and exploitation of its mining
projects, including the 30-year mining licence (renewable for two
further periods of 30 years) for the Salamanca Project, however any
new proceedings opened by the Company is now not allowed under the
aforementioned new law.
In November 2021, BME received
formal notification from MITECO that it had rejected the
construction of the plant as a radioactive facility (NSC II) at the Company's Salamanca
Project following an unfavourable report for the grant of NSC II
issued by the Board of the NSC in July 2021.
BEL strongly refutes the NSC's
assessment and, in its opinion, the NSC adopted an arbitrary
decision with the technical issues used as justification to issue
the unfavourable report lacking in both technical and legal
support.
BME submitted documentation,
including an 'Improvement Report' to supplement its initial NSC II
application, along with the corresponding arguments that address
all the issues raised by the NSC, and a request for its
reassessment by the NSC, to MITECO in July 2021.
Further documentation was submitted
to MITECO in August 2021, in which BME, with strongly supported
arguments, dismantled all of the technical issues used by the NSC
as justification to issue the unfavourable report. BME again
restated that the project is compliant with all requirements for
NSC II to be awarded and requested its NSC II Application be
reassessed by the NSC.
In addition, BME requested from
MITECO access to the files associated with the Authorisation for
Construction and Authorisation for Dismantling and Closure for the
radioactive facilities at La Haba (Badajoz) and Saelices El Chico
(Salamanca), which are owned by ENUSA Industrias Avandas S.A., in
order to verify and contrast the conditions approved by the
competent administrative and regulatory bodies for other similar
uranium projects in Spain.
Based on a detailed comparison of
the different licensing files undertaken by BME following receipt
of these files, it is clear that BME, in its NSC II submission, has
been required to provide information that does not correspond to:
(i) the regulatory framework, (ii) the scope of the current
procedural stage (i.e., at the NSC II stage), and/or (iii) the
criteria applied in other licensing processes for similar
radioactive facilities). Accordingly, BEL considers that the NSC
has acted in a discriminatory and arbitrary manner when assessing
the NSC II application for the Salamanca Project.
In BEL's strong opinion, MITECO has
rejected BME's NSC II Application without following the legally
established procedure, as the Improvement Report has not been taken
into account and sent to the NSC for its assessment, as requested
on multiple occasions by BME.
In this regard, BEL believes that
MITECO have infringed regulations on administrative procedures in
Spain but also under protection afforded to BEL under the ECT,
which would imply that the decision on the rejection of BME's NSC
II Application is not legal.
In April 2023, BME submitted a
contentious-administrative appeal before the Spanish National Court
in an attempt to overturn the MITECO decision denying NSC
II.
Further, the BME received formal
notifications in December 2023 which upheld appeals submitted by a
non-governmental organisation, Plataforma Stop Uranio, and the city
council of Villavieja de Yeltes (the appellants) to revoke the first
instance judgements related to the Authorisation of Exceptional
Land Use (AEUL) and the
Urbanism License (UL),
which annuled both the AEUL and UL.
The AEUL and the UL were granted to
BME in July 2017 and August 2020 by the Regional Commission of
Environment and Urbanism, and the Municipality of Retortillo
respectively.
The appellants subsequently filed
administrative appeals against the AEUL and the UL at the first
instance courts in Salamanca. The administrative appeals against
the AEUL and UL were dismissed in September 2022 and January 2023
respectively.
One of the appellants subsequently
lodged appeals before the High Court of Justice of Castilla y León
(TSJ), with the TSJ
delivering judgements in December 2023 to revoke the first instance
judgements and declare the AEUL and the UL null.
BME strongly disagrees with the
fundamentals of the TSJ's judgement and having previously submitted
cassation appeals against the TSJ judgements before the Spanish
Supreme Court, BME has withdrawn the appeals to preserve BEL's
rights under international arbitration.
Additional Information on the Global Nuclear Power and Uranium
Market
The outlook for nuclear power and
the uranium market continued to strengthen during the quarter, with
several other important recent developments in the sector,
including:
· UK
government considering a role for small modular reactors in AI
expansion. A new AI Energy Council is to be established to study
the opportunities for "renewable and innovative energy solutions,
including small modular reactors" as part of the UK government's
plan for AI.
· Orano
announced that the SOMAIR / Arlit uranium mine in Niger,
majority-owned (63.4%) and operated by the company would suspend
operations as of the end of October due to escalating
project-related financial issues. Orano has been unable to export
the facility's production subsequent to the military coup in Niger
(July 2023) and that SOPAMIN, the shareholder representing the
State of Niger (36.6%), had failed to pay any of its
project-related debts.
· The
Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) convened its annual industry
conference, "International Uranium Fuel Seminar - 2024" in October
2024 in Kansas City, Missouri. The gathering drew about 200
participants principally focused on the U.S. nuclear utility sector
but with representatives from the global nuclear fuel supply chain
in attendance
Several presenters summarised issues
in the current and projected global nuclear fuel markets including
the UxC Executive V.P., International, who presented a detailed
assessment of the current situation with Russian nuclear fuel and
concluded that "Russia urgently needs to secure uranium going
forward."
Additionally, Kazatomprom's Managing
Director, Sales, provided an update on the company's uranium
production and transport but also an overview of long-term supply /
demand dynamics containing the observation "new potential
production is not sufficient to cover demand post-2030."
· Japan's Nippon.com reports that the Tohoku Electric Power
Company brought the number 2 reactor at Onagawa Nuclear Power
Station back online, 13 years after the plant was shut-down
following the March 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and subsequent
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident. The reactor
initially entered commercial operation in July 1995.
· Korea
Hydro & Nuclear Power (KHNP) initiated construction of the Shin
Hanul 3 & 4 reactors in South Korea during the quarter. KHNP
applied for construction licenses in 2016 with projected operation
in 2022-2023. However, the election of President Moon Jae-in and
the government's nuclear phase-out policy resulted in the units
being suspended. South Korea's Nuclear Safety and Security
Commission issued construction licenses for the reactors in
September 2024.
· Vietnam's National Assembly approved the resumption of the
delayed Ninh Thuan Nuclear Power Project. Initially approved in
2005, a siting study resulted in the selection of a coastal site in
Ninh Thuan Province for the two-reactor development; however, the
government suspended the project in 2016 due to safety, funding and
technical issues.
· Sweden
is considering taking a stake in the new nuclear power plants it
wants the private sector to construct over the coming decades to
meet an expected surge in demand for fossil-free electricity. The
government wants the equivalent of two large-scale reactors built
in the next decade, which will cost ~US$37 billion. A
government-appointed commission said the government should be ready
to provide loans to cover 75% of the total amount and to guarantee
prices for 40 years.
Further, the government inquiry
recommends lifting Swedish uranium ban. Sweden should remove its
prohibition on uranium mining to allow it to be exploited like
other natural resources regulated under the Swedish Minerals Act, a
government inquiry has concluded.
· Romania is resuming uranium production to power its own
nuclear reactors as part of the country's energy strategy for
2025-2035 with production of electricity from renewable and nuclear
sources for Romania's "green transition".
· Kazatomprom released its 3Q 2024 operations and trading
results on 1 November 2024, reporting that aggregate uranium
production for the three months ending 30 September rose 16%
year-on-year, reaching 15.3Mlb in 3Q 2024. Total uranium output for
the first nine months of 2024 rose to 43.6Mlb, an increase of 9%
over the comparable period of 2023.
Full year guidance for uranium
production remained at 58.5-61.1Mlb, at an all-in sustaining cost
(AISC) of US$27.75-29.25
per pound, which was a slight increase from the 2Q 2024 estimate of
US$26.00-27.50 per pound. Both capital expenditures and AISC
estimates rose due to changes in the construction schedules of new
facilities, including increased development costs for
infrastructure at three development projects, coupled with
increased prices of construction services and drilling
materials.
Further, Kazatomprom announced in
the quarter JV partner changes from Russian to Chinese partners.
Rosatom sold it's 49.98% share in Zerechnoye (9Mlb in Reserves,
completes in 2028) to State Nuclear Uranium Development Co (China).
Uranium One is expected to sell it's 30% interests in JV Korasan
(86Mlb in Reserves with life until 2038) and Kyzylkum (processing
facility) to China Uranium Development.
· Cameco
reported the company's Q3 2024 results on 7 November 2024. Uranium
production is now expected to total 37.0Mlb (100%), while Cameco's
share should equate to up to 23.1Mlb. The principal contribution to
the incremental increase is the anticipated output of the Key Lake
mill, which is now forecast to reach 19.0Mlb, as compared to the
previous planned 18.0Mlb. However, Cameco now expects that its
purchases from JV Inkai (Kazakhstan) will be incrementally reduced
as the project appears to be operating below its planned output of
8.3Mlb (100% basis) due to "the differences in the annual mine
plan, a shift in acidification schedule for new wellfields, and
unstable acid supply throughout the year."
For the first nine months of 2024,
Cameco reports an increase in average realised sales price
year-on-year, which rose from US$48.62 per pound in 2023 to
US$58.28 per pound in 2024.
Forward Looking
Statements
Statements regarding plans with respect to Berkeley's mineral
properties are forward-looking statements. There can be no
assurance that Berkeley's plans for development of its mineral
properties will proceed as currently expected. There can also be no
assurance that Berkeley will be able to confirm the presence of
additional mineral deposits, that any mineralisation will prove to
be economic or that a mine will successfully be developed on any of
Berkeley mineral properties. These forward-looking statements are
based on Berkeley's expectations and beliefs concerning future
events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to
risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside
the control of Berkeley, which could cause actual results to differ
materially from such statements. Berkeley makes no undertaking to
subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made
in this announcement, to reflect the circumstances or events after
the date of that report.
Competent Persons
Statements
The information in this announcement that relates to
Exploration Results is extracted from an announcement dated 29
January 2025, entitled 'Shallow, thick zones of lithium and
rubidium mineralisation intersected in drilling at Conchas
Project', which is available to view at www.berkeleyenergia.com.
Berkeley confirms that: a) it is not aware of any new information
or data that materially affects the information included in the
original announcement; b) all material assumptions and technical
parameters underpinning the Exploration Results in the original
announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and
c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons'
findings are presented in this announcement have not been
materially modified from the original
announcement.
The information in this announcement that relates to the
Mineral Resource Estimate is extracted from an announcement dated
27 August 2024 entitled 'Annual Report 2024', which is available to
view at www.berkeleyenergia.com
and is based on,
and fairly represents information compiled by Mr Enrique Martínez,
a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of
Mining and Metallurgy. Berkeley confirms that: a) it is not aware
of any new information or data that materially affects the
information included in the original announcement; b) all material
assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the Mineral
Resource Estimate in the original announcement continue to apply
and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in
which the relevant Competent Persons' findings are presented in
this announcement have not been materially modified from the
original announcement.
References
1 www.mordorintelligence.com/es/industry-reports/rubidium-market
2 www.straitsresearch.com/report/rubidium-market
3 www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/rubidium-market-27298
4 U.S Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries, January
2024 - Rubidium
5 www.usgs.gov/news/national-news-release/us-geological-survey-releases-2022-list-critical-minerals
The information contained within this announcement is deemed
by the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under
the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014 as it forms part of
UK domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act
2018 ('MAR'). Upon the publication of this announcement via
Regulatory Information Service ('RIS'), this inside information is
now considered to be in the public domain.
Appendix 1: Mineral Resource at Salamanca
Deposit
Name
|
Resource Category
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
U3O8
(ppm)
|
U3O8
(Mlbs)
|
Retortillo
|
Measured
|
4.1
|
498
|
4.5
|
|
Indicated
|
11.3
|
395
|
9.8
|
|
Inferred
|
0.2
|
368
|
0.2
|
|
Total
|
15.6
|
422
|
14.5
|
Zona 7
|
Measured
Indicated
|
5.2
10.5
|
674
761
|
7.8
17.6
|
|
Inferred
|
6.0
|
364
|
4.8
|
|
Total
|
21.7
|
631
|
30.2
|
Alameda
|
Indicated
|
20.0
|
455
|
20.1
|
|
Inferred
|
0.7
|
657
|
1.0
|
|
Total
|
20.7
|
462
|
21.1
|
Las Carbas
|
Inferred
|
0.6
|
443
|
0.6
|
Cristina
|
Inferred
|
0.8
|
460
|
0.8
|
Caridad
|
Inferred
|
0.4
|
382
|
0.4
|
Villares
|
Inferred
|
0.7
|
672
|
1.1
|
Villares North
|
Inferred
|
0.3
|
388
|
0.2
|
Total Retortillo
Satellites
|
Total
|
2.8
|
492
|
3.0
|
Villar
|
Inferred
|
5.0
|
446
|
4.9
|
Alameda Nth Zone 2
|
Inferred
|
1.2
|
472
|
1.3
|
Alameda Nth Zone 19
|
Inferred
|
1.1
|
492
|
1.2
|
Alameda Nth Zone 21
|
Inferred
|
1.8
|
531
|
2.1
|
Total Alameda
Satellites
|
Total
|
9.1
|
472
|
9.5
|
Gambuta
|
Inferred
|
12.7
|
394
|
11.1
|
Salamanca Project
Total
|
Measured
|
9.3
|
597
|
12.3
|
Indicated
|
41.8
|
516
|
47.5
|
Inferred
|
31.5
|
395
|
29.6
|
Total (*)
|
82.6
|
514
|
89.3
|
Appendix 2: Summary of Mining Tenements
As at 31 December 2024, the Company
had an interest in the following tenements:
Location
|
Tenement Name
|
Percentage
Interest
|
Status
|
Spain
|
|
|
|
Salamanca
|
D.S.R Salamanca 28
(Alameda)
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
D.S.R Salamanca 29
(Villar)
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
E.C. Retortillo-Santidad
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
E.C. Lucero
|
100%
|
Pending
|
|
I.P. Abedules
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Abetos
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Alcornoques
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Alisos
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Bardal
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Barquilla
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Berzosa
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Campillo
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Castaños 2
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Ciervo
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Conchas
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Dehesa
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. El Águila
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. El
Vaqueril
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Espinera
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Horcajada
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Lis
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Mailleras
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Mimbre
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Pedreras
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
E.P. Herradura*
|
100%
|
Granted
|
Cáceres
|
I.P. Almendro
E.C. Gambuta
|
100%
100%
|
Granted^
Pending^
|
|
I.P. Ibor
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Olmos
|
100%
|
Granted
|
Badajoz
|
I.P. Los Bélicos
|
100%
|
Granted**
|
|
I.P.A. Ampliación Los
Bélicos
|
100%
|
Pending**
|
Ciudad Real
|
I.P.A. La Majada
|
100%
|
Pending**
|
*An application for a 1-year
extension at E.P. Herradura
was previously rejected however this decision has
been appealed and the Company awaits the decision regarding its
appeal.
^The Company has applied for an
Exploitation Concession from the existing IP Almendro.
**Exploracion de Recuros
Minerales S.L.U (ERM), a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, has entered into a Tenement
Sale and Purchase Agreement and Royalty Deed to acquire IP Los
Bélicos, IPA
Ampliación Los Bélicos, and IPA La Majada.
Appendix 3: Related Party Payments
During the quarter ended 31 December
2024, the Company made payments of $82,000 to related parties and
their associates. These payments relate to existing remuneration
arrangements (director and consulting fees plus statutory
superannuation).
Appendix 4: Exploration and Mining
Expenditure
During the quarter ended 31 December
2024, the Company made the following payments in relation to
exploration and development activities:
Activity
|
A$000
|
Permitting related expenditure
(including legal costs)
|
467
|
Drilling related costs
|
187
|
Assay costs, radiological protection
and monitoring
|
62
|
Consultants and other
expenditure
|
229
|
Payment/(return) of VAT and other
social taxes in Spain
|
59
|
Total as reported in the Appendix 5B
|
1,004
|
There were no mining or production
activities and expenses incurred during the quarter ended 31
December 2024.
Appendix 5B
Mining exploration entity or oil and gas exploration
entity
quarterly cash flow report
(a) Name of
entity
|
Berkeley Energia Limited
|
(b) ABN
|
(c)
|
Quarter ended ("current
quarter")
|
40 052 468 569
|
|
31 December 2024
|
Consolidated statement of cash flows
|
Current quarter
$A'000
|
Year to date
(6 months)
$A'000
|
1.
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
-
|
-
|
1.1
|
Receipts from customers
|
1.2
|
Payments for
|
(1,004)
|
(1,623)
|
|
(a) exploration &
evaluation
|
|
(b)
development
|
-
|
-
|
|
(c)
production
|
-
|
-
|
|
(d) staff
costs
|
(442)
|
(737)
|
|
(e) administration and
corporate costs
|
(346)
|
(599)
|
1.3
|
Dividends received (see
note 3)
|
-
|
-
|
1.4
|
Interest received
|
794
|
1,642
|
1.5
|
Interest and other costs of finance
paid
|
-
|
-
|
1.6
|
Income taxes paid
|
-
|
-
|
1.7
|
Government grants and tax
incentives
|
-
|
-
|
1.8
|
Other (provide details if
material)
(a) Business
Development
(b) Arbitration related
expenses
|
(28)
-
|
(113)
(1,298)
|
1.9
|
Net
cash from / (used in) operating activities
|
(1,026)
|
(2,728)
|
|
2.
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
-
|
-
|
2.1
|
Payments to acquire or
for:
|
|
(a) entities
|
|
(b) tenements
|
-
|
-
|
|
(c) property, plant and
equipment
|
-
|
-
|
|
(d) exploration &
evaluation
|
-
|
-
|
|
(e)
investments
|
-
|
-
|
|
(f) other
non-current assets
|
-
|
-
|
2.2
|
Proceeds from the disposal
of:
|
-
|
-
|
|
(a) entities
|
|
(b) tenements
|
-
|
-
|
|
(c) property, plant and
equipment
|
-
|
-
|
|
(d)
investments
|
-
|
-
|
|
(e) other non-current
assets
|
-
|
-
|
2.3
|
Cash flows from loans to other
entities
|
-
|
-
|
2.4
|
Dividends received (see
note 3)
|
-
|
-
|
2.5
|
Other (provide details if
material)
|
-
|
-
|
2.6
|
Net
cash from / (used in) investing activities
|
-
|
-
|
|
3.
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
-
|
-
|
3.1
|
Proceeds from issues of equity
securities (excluding convertible debt securities)
|
3.2
|
Proceeds from issue of convertible
debt securities
|
-
|
-
|
3.3
|
Proceeds from exercise of
options
|
-
|
-
|
3.4
|
Transaction costs related to issues
of equity securities or convertible debt securities
|
-
|
-
|
3.5
|
Proceeds from borrowings
|
-
|
-
|
3.6
|
Repayment of borrowings
|
-
|
-
|
3.7
|
Transaction costs related to loans
and borrowings
|
-
|
-
|
3.8
|
Dividends paid
|
-
|
-
|
3.9
|
Other (provide details if
material)
|
-
|
-
|
3.10
|
Net
cash from / (used in) financing activities
|
-
|
-
|
|
4.
|
Net
increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents for the
period
|
|
|
4.1
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
72,385
|
77,345
|
4.2
|
Net cash from / (used in) operating
activities (item 1.9 above)
|
(1,026)
|
(2,728)
|
4.3
|
Net cash from / (used in) investing
activities (item 2.6 above)
|
-
|
-
|
4.4
|
Net cash from / (used in) financing
activities (item 3.10 above)
|
-
|
-
|
4.5
|
Effect of movement in exchange rates
on cash held
|
8,070
|
4,812
|
4.6
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
79,429
|
79,429
|
5.
|
Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents
at the end of the quarter (as shown in the
consolidated statement of cash flows) to the related items in the
accounts
|
Current quarter
$A'000
|
Previous quarter
$A'000
|
5.1
|
Bank balances
|
79,379
|
72,335
|
5.2
|
Call deposits
|
50
|
50
|
5.3
|
Bank overdrafts
|
-
|
-
|
5.4
|
Other (provide details)
|
-
|
-
|
5.5
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of quarter (should equal
item 4.6 above)
|
79,429
|
72,385
|
6.
|
Payments to related parties of the entity and their
associates
|
Current quarter
$A'000
|
6.1
|
Aggregate amount of payments to
related parties and their associates included in
item 1
|
(82)
|
6.2
|
Aggregate amount of payments to
related parties and their associates included in
item 2
|
-
|
Note: if any amounts are shown in items 6.1 or 6.2, your
quarterly activity report must include a description of, and an
explanation for, such payments.
|
7.
|
Financing facilities Note: the term "facility'
includes all forms of financing arrangements available to the
entity.
Add notes as necessary for an understanding of the sources of
finance available to the entity.
|
Total facility amount at
quarter end
$A'000
|
Amount drawn at quarter end
$A'000
|
7.1
|
Loan facilities
|
-
|
-
|
7.2
|
Credit standby
arrangements
|
-
|
-
|
7.3
|
Other (please specify)
|
-
|
-
|
7.4
|
Total financing facilities
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
Unused financing facilities available at quarter
end
|
-
|
7.6
|
Include in the box below a
description of each facility above, including the lender, interest
rate, maturity date and whether it is secured or unsecured. If any
additional financing facilities have been entered into or are
proposed to be entered into after quarter end, include a note
providing details of those facilities as well.
|
Not applicable
|
8.
|
Estimated cash available for future operating
activities
|
$A'000
|
8.1
|
Net cash from / (used in) operating
activities (item 1.9)
|
(1,026)
|
8.2
|
(Payments for exploration & evaluation classified as investing
activities) (item 2.1(d))
|
-
|
8.3
|
Total relevant outgoings
(item 8.1 + item 8.2)
|
(1,026)
|
8.4
|
Cash and cash equivalents at quarter
end (item 4.6)
|
79,429
|
8.5
|
Unused finance facilities available
at quarter end (item 7.5)
|
-
|
8.6
|
Total available funding
(item 8.4 + item 8.5)
|
79,429
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
Estimated quarters of funding available (item 8.6 divided
by item 8.3)
|
>10
|
Note: if the entity has reported positive relevant outgoings
(ie a net cash inflow) in item 8.3, answer item 8.7 as
"N/A". Otherwise, a figure for the estimated quarters of funding
available must be included in item 8.7.
|
8.8
|
If item 8.7 is less than
2 quarters, please provide answers to the following
questions:
|
|
8.8.1 Does
the entity expect that it will continue to have the current level
of net operating cash flows for the time being and, if not, why
not?
|
|
Answer: Not applicable
|
|
8.8.2 Has
the entity taken any steps, or does it propose to take any steps,
to raise further cash to fund its operations and, if so, what are
those steps and how likely does it believe that they will be
successful?
|
|
Answer: Not applicable
|
|
8.8.3 Does
the entity expect to be able to continue its operations and to meet
its business objectives and, if so, on what basis?
|
|
Answer: Not applicable
|
|
Note: where item 8.7 is less than 2 quarters, all of
questions 8.8.1, 8.8.2 and 8.8.3 above must be
answered.
|
Compliance statement
1 This statement has
been prepared in accordance with accounting standards and policies
which comply with Listing Rule 19.11A.
2 This statement
gives a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.
Date:
31 January 2025
Authorised by: Company
Secretary
(Name of body or officer authorising
release - see note 4)
Notes
1. This
quarterly cash flow report and the accompanying activity report
provide a basis for informing the market about the entity's
activities for the past quarter, how they have been financed and
the effect this has had on its cash position. An entity that wishes
to disclose additional information over and above the minimum
required under the Listing Rules is encouraged to do so.
2. If
this quarterly cash flow report has been prepared in accordance
with Australian Accounting Standards, the definitions in, and
provisions of, AASB 6:
Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and
AASB 107: Statement of Cash
Flows apply to this report. If this quarterly cash flow
report has been prepared in accordance with other accounting
standards agreed by ASX pursuant to Listing Rule 19.11A, the
corresponding equivalent standards apply to this report.
3.
Dividends received may be classified either as cash flows from
operating activities or cash flows from investing activities,
depending on the accounting policy of the entity.
4. If
this report has been authorised for release to the market by your
board of directors, you can insert here: "By the board". If it has
been authorised for release to the market by a committee of your
board of directors, you can insert here: "By the [name of board committee - eg Audit and Risk Committee]". If it
has been authorised for release to the market by a disclosure
committee, you can insert here: "By the Disclosure
Committee".
5. If
this report has been authorised for release to the market by your
board of directors and you wish to hold yourself out as complying
with recommendation 4.2 of the ASX Corporate Governance
Council's Corporate Governance
Principles and Recommendations, the board should have
received a declaration from its CEO and CFO that, in their opinion,
the financial records of the entity have been properly maintained,
that this report complies with the appropriate accounting standards
and gives a true and fair view of the cash flows of the entity, and
that their opinion has been formed on the basis of a sound system
of risk management and internal control which is operating
effectively.