CISSV C3is Inc

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(4)
Registration No. 333-276868

PROSPECTUS

C3IS INC.

120,000,000 Units consisting of

Common Shares or Pre-Funded Warrants and Class C-1 Warrants to

purchase Common Shares and Class C-2 Warrants to purchase

Common Shares

(and Common Shares underlying the Pre-Funded Warrants, Class C-1

Warrants and Class C-2 Warrants)

We are offering 120,000,000 Units (the “Units”), each Unit consisting of one share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (each, a “Common Share”), one half of a Class C-1 warrant to purchase one Common Share (each, a “Class C-1 Warrant”) and one Class C-2 warrant to purchase one Common Share (each, a “Class C-2 Warrant”, and together with the Class C-1 Warrants, the “Class C Warrants”), at a public offering price of $0.05 per Unit. Each Class C-1 Warrant will be immediately exercisable for one Common Share at an exercise price of $0.075 per share (a multiple of 1.5 times the offering price per Unit) and expire five years after the issuance date. Each Class C-2 Warrant will be immediately exercisable for one Common Share at an exercise price of $0.085 per share (a multiple of 1.7 times the offering price per Unit) and expire five years after the issuance date. We are also offering to each purchaser of Units that would otherwise result in the purchaser’s beneficial ownership exceeding 4.99% (or, at the election of the holder, 9.99%) of our outstanding Common Shares immediately following the consummation of this offering, the opportunity to purchase Units consisting of one pre-funded warrant (in lieu of one Common Share) and one half of a Class C-1 Warrant and one Class C-2 Warrant. Subject to limited exceptions, a holder of pre-funded warrants will not have the right to exercise any portion of its pre-funded warrants if the holder, together with its affiliates, would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% (or, at the election of the holder, 9.99%) of the number of Common Shares outstanding immediately after giving effect to such exercise. Each pre-funded warrant will be exercisable for one Common Share. The purchase price of each Unit including a pre-funded warrant will be equal to the price per Unit including one Common Share, minus $0.01, and the remaining exercise price of each pre-funded warrant will equal $0.01 per share. The pre-funded warrants will be immediately exercisable (subject to the beneficial ownership cap) and may be exercised at any time until all of the pre-funded warrants are exercised in full. For each Unit including a pre-funded warrant we sell (without regard to any limitation on exercise set forth therein), the number of Units including one Common Share we are offering will be decreased on a one-for-one basis. The Common Shares and pre-funded warrants, if any, can each be purchased in this offering only with the accompanying one half Class C-1 Warrant and one Class C-2 Warrant as part of a Unit, but the components of the Units will immediately separate upon issuance. See “Description of Securities We Are Offering” in this prospectus for more information.

We are also registering the Common Shares included in the Units and the Common Shares issuable from time to time upon exercise of the Class C-1 Warrants, Class C-2 Warrants and pre-funded warrants offered hereby. This prospectus also covers any additional securities that may become issuable by reason of share splits, share dividends or other similar transactions.

Our Common Shares are listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”) and began trading (regular way) on June 22, 2023 under the symbol “CISS”. On March 14, 2024, the closing sale price as reported on Nasdaq of the Common Shares was $0.079 per share. There is no established trading market for the pre-funded warrants, Class C-1 Warrants, or Class C-2 Warrants and we do not expect an active trading market to develop. We do not intend to list the pre-funded warrants, Class C-1 Warrants, or Class C-2 Warrants on any securities exchange or other trading market. Without an active trading market, the liquidity of these securities will be limited.

We are an “emerging growth company” as that term is used in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and, as such, we may elect to comply with certain reduced public company reporting requirements. See “Risk Factors” and “Prospectus Summary—Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company.”

Investing in our securities involves risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 18 of this prospectus for a discussion of information that should be considered in connection with an investment in our securities.

We have granted the underwriters an option for a period of up to 45 days to purchase up to 18,000,000 additional Common Shares and/or pre-funded warrants and/or up to an additional 9,000,000 Class C-1 Warrants and/or 18,000,000 Class C-2 Warrants. The underwriter may exercise the over-allotment option with respect to Common Shares only, Pre-Funded Warrants only, Class C-1 Warrants only, Class C-2 Warrants only, or any combination thereof.

The underwriters expect to deliver the securities to purchasers on or about March 19, 2024.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed on the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Aegis Capital Corp.

Prospectus dated March 15, 2024.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

-i-

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS

This prospectus is part of a registration statement on Form F-1 that we filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for the offering by us of Units consisting of Common Shares, pre-funded warrants, Class C-1 Warrants and Class C-2 Warrants.

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus and in any free writing prospectus filed by us with the SEC. Neither we, nor the Underwriter, have authorized anyone to provide you with different or additional information or to make representations other than those contained in this prospectus. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not making an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer is not permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus or such other date stated in this prospectus, and our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or prospects may have changed since those dates.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to “C3is,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” “us” or similar terms refer to the registrant, C3is Inc., and its subsidiaries, except where the context otherwise requires.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future results of our operations or our performance. Words such as “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify the forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, no assurance can be given that such expectations will prove to have been correct. These statements involve known and unknown risks and are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates which are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding:

1

WE UNDERTAKE NO OBLIGATION TO PUBLICLY UPDATE OR REVISE ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS OR THE DOCUMENTS TO WHICH WE REFER YOU IN THIS PROSPECTUS, TO REFLECT ANY CHANGE IN OUR EXPECTATIONS WITH RESPECT TO SUCH STATEMENTS OR ANY CHANGE IN EVENTS, CONDITIONS OR CIRCUMSTANCES ON WHICH ANY STATEMENT IS BASED, EXCEPT AS REQUIRED BY LAW.

2

ENFORCEABILITY OF CIVIL LIABILITIES

We are incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands and our principal executive offices are located outside the United States. Our directors and officers reside outside the United States. In addition, substantially all of our assets and the assets of our directors and officers are located outside the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for you to serve legal process within the United States upon us or any of these persons. It may also not be possible for you to enforce, both in and outside the United States, judgments you may obtain in United States courts against us or these persons in any action, including actions based upon the civil liability provisions of U.S. federal or state securities laws.

Furthermore, there is substantial doubt that courts in jurisdictions outside the U.S. (i) would enforce judgments of U.S. courts obtained in actions against us or our directors or officers based upon the civil liability provisions of applicable U.S. federal and state securities laws or (ii) would enforce, in original actions, liabilities against us or our directors or officers based on those laws.

MARKET DATA

The Company uses market data throughout this prospectus. The Company has obtained certain market data from publicly available information and industry publications. These sources generally state that the information they provide has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the accuracy and completeness of the information are not guaranteed. The forecasts and projections are based on industry surveys and the preparers’ experience in the industry, and there is no assurance that any of the projections or forecasts will be achieved. The Company believes that the surveys and market research others have performed are reliable, but the Company has not independently verified this information.

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

RISK FACTORS

Any investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the following factors, as well as the other information set forth in this prospectus, before making an investment in our securities. Any of the described risks could significantly and negatively affect our business, financial condition, operating results and price of our securities. The following risk factors describe the material risks that are presently known to us.

Risk Factors Summary

Risks Related to our Industry

Risks Related to our Business

18

Risks Related to Taxation

Risks Related to an Investment in a Marshall Islands Corporation

Risks Related to our Common Shares and this Offering

Risks Related to the Spin-off

19

Risks Related to our Industry

Charter rates for dry bulk vessels are volatile and may decrease in the future, which may adversely affect our earnings and our financial condition.

The dry bulk shipping industry continues to be cyclical with high volatility in charter rates and profitability among the various types of dry bulk vessels. In 2021, charter rates for dry bulk vessels increased significantly from lower levels that prevailed during previous years. The Baltic Dry Index, or the “BDI”, an index published by The Baltic Exchange of shipping rates for key dry bulk routes, declined in 2020, principally as a result of the global economic slowdown caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Strong global growth and increased infrastructure spending led to a rise in demand for commodities, which combined with a historically low orderbook and port delays and congestion, resulted in an increase in BDI in 2021 and the first half of 2022, before moderating and declining significantly in the second half of 2022 as port congestion eased and Chinese demand for drybulk commodities weakened and stood at the lows for the year at the end of December 2022, and stood at 1,460 on January 29, 2024. Average handysize drybulk carrier spot rates ranged in 2022 from a low of $10,833 per day on December 30, 2022 and a high of $33,333 per day on March 25, 2022. During 2023, average handysize drybulk carrier spot rates ranged from a low of $7,000 per day on August 4, 2023 and a high of $18,250 per day on December 15, 2023, and stood at $11,250 per day on January 26, 2024.

The factors affecting the supply and demand for drybulk vessels are outside of our control and are difficult to predict with confidence. As a result, the nature, timing, direction and degree of changes in industry conditions are also unpredictable.

Factors that influence demand for drybulk vessel capacity include:

Factors that influence the supply of drybulk vessel capacity include:

20

Factors influencing the supply of and demand for shipping capacity are outside of our control, and we may not be able to correctly assess the nature, timing and degree of changes in industry conditions. We anticipate that the future demand for our drybulk vessels and, in turn, drybulk charter rates, will be dependent, among other things, upon economic growth in the world’s economies, seasonal and regional changes in demand, changes in the capacity of the global drybulk vessel fleet and the sources and supply of drybulk cargo to be transported by sea. A decline in demand for commodities transported in drybulk vessels or an increase in supply of drybulk vessels could cause a significant decline in charter rates, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance as to the sustainability of future economic growth, if any, due to unexpected demand shocks.

The tanker industry is cyclical and volatile, which may adversely affect our earnings and available cash flow.

The tanker industry is both cyclical and volatile in terms of charter rates and profitability. Periodic adjustments to the supply of and demand for crude oil and product tankers cause the industry to be cyclical in nature. We expect continued volatility in market rates for tankers in the foreseeable future with a consequent effect on our short and medium-term liquidity. A worsening of current global economic conditions may cause tanker charter rates to decline and thereby adversely affect our ability to charter or re-charter our tanker and any renewal or replacement charters that we enter into, may not be sufficient to allow us to operate our tanker profitably. In addition, the conflict in Ukraine is disrupting energy production and trade patterns, including shipping in the Black Sea and elsewhere, and its impact on energy prices and tanker rates, which initially have increased, is uncertain. Fluctuations in charter rates and vessel values result from changes in the supply and demand for tanker capacity and changes in the supply and demand for oil and oil products. The factors affecting the supply and demand for tankers are outside of our control, and the nature, timing and degree of changes in industry conditions are unpredictable.

The factors that influence demand for tanker capacity include:

21

The factors that influence the supply of tanker capacity include:

In addition to the prevailing and anticipated freight rates, factors that affect the rate of newbuilding, scrapping and laying-up include newbuilding prices, secondhand vessel values in relation to scrap prices, costs of

22

bunkers and other operating costs, costs associated with classification society surveys, normal maintenance costs, insurance coverage costs, the efficiency and age profile of the existing tanker fleet in the market, and government and industry regulation of maritime transportation practices, particularly environmental protection laws and regulations. These factors influencing the supply of and demand for shipping capacity are outside of our control, and we may not be able to correctly assess the nature, timing and degree of changes in industry conditions.

We anticipate that the future demand for our tanker, and any additional tankers we acquire, will be dependent upon economic growth in the world’s economies, seasonal and regional changes in demand, changes in the capacity of the global tanker fleet and the sources and supply of oil and petroleum products to be transported by sea. Given the number of new tankers currently on order with shipyards, the capacity of the global tanker fleet seems likely to increase and there can be no assurance as to the timing or extent of future economic growth. Adverse economic, political, social or other developments could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.

Declines in oil and natural gas prices for an extended period of time, or market expectations of potential decreases in these prices, could negatively affect our future growth in the tanker sector. Sustained periods of low oil and natural gas prices typically result in reduced exploration and extraction because oil and natural gas companies’ capital expenditure budgets are subject to cash flow from such activities and are therefore sensitive to changes in energy prices. These changes in commodity prices can have a material effect on demand for our services, and periods of low demand can cause excess vessel supply and intensify the competition in the industry, which often results in vessels, particularly older and less technologically-advanced vessels, being idle for long periods of time. We cannot predict the future level of demand for our crude oil transportation services or future conditions of the oil and natural gas industry. Any decrease in exploration, development or production expenditures by oil and natural gas companies could reduce our revenues and materially harm our business and results of operations.

Our financial results and operations may be adversely affected by health crises, such as the recent COVID-19 pandemic, and related governmental responses.

From the beginning of calendar year 2020 into early 2023, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in numerous actions taken by governments and governmental agencies in an attempt to mitigate the spread or any resurgence of the virus, including travel bans, quarantines, and other emergency public health measures such as lockdown measures. These measures, which have since been relaxed, negatively impacted regional and global economies and trade patterns in markets in which we operate, the way we operate our business, and the businesses of our charterers and suppliers. Companies, including us, also took precautions, such as requiring employees to work remotely and imposing travel restrictions, while some other businesses were required to close entirely. Moreover, we face significant risks to our personnel and operations due to health crises, including our crews which travel to ports throughout the world, as well as our shore-based personnel.

Measures against COVID-19 restricted crew rotations on our vessels, and, as a result, we experienced disruptions to our normal vessel operations caused by increased deviation time associated with positioning our vessels to countries in which we can undertake a crew rotation in compliance with such measures. Delays in crew rotations leads to issues with crew fatigue, which can result in delays or other operational issues. Health crises could lead to increased expenses due to incremental fuel consumption and days in which our vessels are unable to earn revenue in order to deviate to certain ports on which we would ordinarily not call during a typical voyage. We may also incur additional expenses associated with testing, personal protective equipment, quarantines, and travel expenses such as airfare costs in order to perform crew rotations in the current environment, and compensation for crew. The impact of COVID-19 also resulted in periodic reduction of industrial activity globally with temporary closures of factories and other facilities, labor shortages and restrictions on travel on a regional basis, depending on the spread of COVID-19 in each particular geography, which impacted demand for some cargoes at times in recent years.

23

Future health crises may affect personnel operating payment systems through which we receive revenues from the chartering of our vessels or pay for our expenses, resulting in delays in payments. We continue to focus on our employees’ well- being, whilst making sure that their operations continue undisrupted and at the same time, adapting to the new ways of operating. As such employees are encouraged and in certain cases required to operate remotely which significantly increases the risk of cyber security attacks.

While currently the COVID-19 pandemic has ceased to significantly impact our business, the occurrence of any of the foregoing events in connection with future health crises, including any significant resurgence of COVID-19, or other pandemics, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition, and value of our vessels.

Global economic conditions may negatively impact the shipping industry.

The world economy is currently facing a number of ongoing challenges, including as a result of recent turmoil and hostilities in various regions, including Syria, Iraq, North Korea, Venezuela, Gaza, the Red Sea North Africa and Ukraine, and lingering impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in certain regions, including China where its zero COVID policy restrictions were only lifted earlier this year. The periodic weaknesses in the global economy in recent years have caused, and may continue to cause, a decrease in worldwide demand for certain goods and, thus, shipping.

Beginning in February of 2022, President Biden and several European leaders announced various economic sanctions against Russia in connection with the aforementioned conflicts in the Ukraine region, which may adversely impact our business. Our business could also be adversely impacted by trade tariffs, trade embargoes or other economic sanctions that limit trading activities by the United States or other countries against countries in the Middle East, Asia or elsewhere as a result of terrorist attacks, hostilities or diplomatic or political pressures. On March 8, 2022, President Biden issued an executive order prohibiting the import of certain Russian energy products into the United States, including crude oil, petroleum, petroleum fuels, oils, liquefied natural gas and coal. Additionally, the executive order prohibits any investments in the Russian energy sector by US persons, among other restrictions.

The U.K. formally exited the EU on January 31, 2020 (informally known as “Brexit). On December 24, 2020, the U.K. and EU entered into a trade and cooperation agreement (the “Trade and Cooperation Agreement”), which was entered into force on May 1, 2021 following ratification by the EU. Brexit has led to ongoing political and economic uncertainty and periods of increased volatility in both the U.K. and in wider European markets for some time. Brexit’s long-term effects will depend on the effects of the implementation and application of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement and any other relevant agreements between the U.K. and EU. Brexit has also given rise to calls of other EU member states’ governments to consider withdrawal. These developments and uncertainties, or the perception that they may occur, have had and may continue to have a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets, and may significantly reduce global market liquidity and restrict the ability of key market participants to operate in certain financial markets. Additionally, Brexit or similar events in other jurisdictions, could impact global markets, including foreign exchange and securities markets. The foregoing factors could depress economic activity and restrict our access to capital, causing a material adverse effect on our business and on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and our ability to pay distributions.

The U.S. government has recently made statements and taken certain actions that may lead to potential changes to U.S. and international trade policies, including recently-imposed tariffs affecting certain Chinese industries. It is unknown whether and to what extent new tariffs (or other new laws or regulations) will be adopted, or the effect that any such actions would have on us or our industry. If any new tariffs, legislation and/or regulations are implemented, or if existing trade agreements are renegotiated or, in particular, if the U.S. government takes retaliatory trade actions due to the recent U.S.-China trade tension, such changes could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

24

Economic slowdown in the Asia Pacific region, particularly in China, may have a material adverse effect on us, as we anticipate a significant number of the port calls made by our vessels will continue to involve the loading or discharging of dry bulk commodities in ports in the Asia Pacific region. Port calls in China represented 11% and 6% of our worldwide port calls in 2021 and 2022, respectively, and revenues from Chinese charterers represented less than 10% of our revenues in 2021 and 2022, respectively. During the first nine months of 2023, there were no port calls in China and no revenues from Chinese charterers. We expect that a substantial portion of our business will continue to involve port calls in China or Chinese counter parties. Changes in the economic conditions of China, and policies adopted by the government to regulate its economy, including with regards to tax matters and environmental concerns (such as achieving carbon neutrality), and their implementation by local authorities could affect our vessels that are either chartered to Chinese customers or that call to Chinese ports, our vessels that undergo dry docking at Chinese shipyards and any financial institutions with whom we enter into financing agreements, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

While global economic conditions have generally improved, relatively weak global economic conditions have had and may continue to have a number of adverse consequences for dry bulk, tankers and other shipping sectors, including, among other things; low charter rates, particularly for vessels employed on short-term time charters or in the spot market; decreases in the market value of dry bulk and tanker vessels and limited secondhand market for the sale of vessels; limited financing for vessels; widespread loan covenant defaults; and declaration of bankruptcy by certain vessel operators, vessel owners, shipyards and charterers. The occurrence of one or more of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

An over-supply of drybulk vessel capacity may depress the current charter rates and, in turn, adversely affect our profitability.

The market supply of drybulk vessels increased due to the high level of new deliveries in recent years. Drybulk newbuildings were delivered in significant numbers starting at the beginning of 2006 and continued to be delivered in significant numbers through 2017, before declining to more moderate levels of newbuilding deliveries. In addition, the drybulk newbuilding orderbook may increase in proportion to the existing fleet. Even though the overall level of the orderbook has declined over the past years, an over-supply of drybulk vessel capacity could depress the current charter rates. Factors that influence the supply of vessel capacity include:

If drybulk vessel capacity increases but the demand for vessel capacity does not increase or increases at a slower rate, charter rates could materially decline, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

The tanker industry is highly dependent upon the crude oil and petroleum products industries.

The employment of our subsidiaries’ vessels is driven by the availability of and demand for crude oil and petroleum products, the availability of modern tanker capacity and the scrapping, conversion, or loss of older

25

vessels. Historically, the world oil and petroleum markets have been volatile and cyclical because of the many conditions and events that affect the supply, price, production and transport of oil, including:

As a result of any reduction in demand or output, the charter rates that we earn from our vessels employed on charters related to market rates may decline or remain at low levels, as they did from the second half of 2020 until the third quarter of 2022, due to the worldwide turbulence caused by COVID-19 pandemic which resulted in demand for oil and oil products to decline.

An over-supply of tankers may lead to a reduction in charter rates, vessel values and profitability.

The market supply of tankers is affected by a number of factors, such as supply and demand for energy resources, including oil and petroleum products, supply and demand for seaborne transportation of such energy resources, and the current and expected purchase orders for new-buildings. While currently the orderbook for tankers is at low levels compared to historical standards, if the capacity of new tankers delivered exceeds the capacity of such vessel types being scrapped and converted to non-trading vessels, global fleet capacity will increase. If the supply of tanker capacity, for the vessel class sizes comprising our fleet in particular, increases, and if the demand for the capacity of such vessel types decreases, or does not increase correspondingly, charter rates could materially decline. A reduction in charter rates and the value of our tankers may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

The market value of drybulk and tanker vessels is highly volatile, and the market values of our vessels may decline and over time may fluctuate significantly. When the market values of our vessels are low, we may incur a loss on sale of a vessel or record an impairment charge, which may adversely affect our profitability

The market value of our vessels may fluctuate significantly, and experienced significant declines during the economic crisis. Currently tanker values are at relatively high levels, but until the second half of 2022 were at relatively low levels for most of the period since the financial crisis in 2008. Drybulk carrier values are currently at relatively low levels, after recent highs from late 2020 through the latter part of 2022, and remain well below the highs reached in 2007 and 2008. The market values of our vessels are subject to potential significant fluctuations depending on a number of factors including:

26

If we sell vessels, the sale may be for less than the vessel’s carrying value in our financial statements, resulting in a reduction in profitability. Furthermore, if vessel values or anticipated future cash flows experience declines, we may have to record an impairment adjustment in our financial statements, which would also result in a reduction in our profits. If we enter into loan agreements in the future to finance or refinance our vessels, and the market value of our fleet subsequently declines, we may not be in compliance with certain provisions of these loan agreements and we may not be able to refinance our debt or obtain additional financing. The loss of our vessels would mean we could not run our business.

Increasing scrutiny and changing expectations from investors, lenders and other market participants with respect to our ESG policies may impose additional costs on us or expose us to additional risks.

Companies across all industries, including the shipping industry, are facing increased scrutiny relating to their ESG policies. Investor advocacy groups, certain institutional investors, investment funds, lenders and other market participants are increasingly focused on ESG practices and in recent years have placed increasing importance on the implications and social cost of their investments. The increased focus and activism related to ESG and similar matters may hinder access to capital, as investors and lenders may decide to reallocate capital or to not commit capital as a result of their assessment of a company’s ESG practices. Companies which do not adapt to or comply with investor, lender or other industry shareholder expectations and standards, which are evolving, or which are perceived to have not responded appropriately to the growing concern for ESG issues, regardless of whether there is a legal requirement to do so, may suffer from reputational damage and the business, financial condition, and/or the stock price of such a company could be materially and adversely affected. As a result, we may be required to implement more stringent ESG procedures or standards so that we continue to have access to capital and our existing and future investors and lenders remain invested in us and make further investments in us.

Specifically, we may face increasing pressures from investors, lenders and other market participants, who are increasingly focused on climate change, to prioritize sustainable energy practices, reduce our carbon footprint and promote sustainability. Additionally, certain investors and lenders may exclude shipping companies, such as us, from their investing portfolios altogether due to environmental, social and governance factors. If we are faced with limitations in the debt and/or equity markets as a result of these concerns, or if we are unable to access alternative means of financing on acceptable terms, or at all, we may be unable to access funds to implement our business strategy or service our indebtedness, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

27

If we cannot meet our charterers’ quality and compliance requirements, including regulations or costs associated with the environmental impact of our vessels, we may not be able to operate our vessels profitably which could have an adverse effect on our future performance, results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

Customers have a high focus on quality, emissions and compliance standards with their suppliers across the entire value chain, including shipping and transportation. There is also increasing focus on the environmental footprint of marine transportation. We are required to maintain operating standards for all of our vessels that emphasize operational safety, quality maintenance, continuous training of our officers and crews and compliance with United States and international regulations, and are subject vetting processes conducted by prospective charterers. In addition, RightShip, which is a voluntary compliance requirement but a desirable chartering verifier among top charterers, is also demanding compliance with their standards regarding environmental acceptability based on a number of variables and factors important in the maritime industry. If we or our manager, or other affiliated entities, including Stealth Maritime, StealthGas or Imperial Petroleum, are rated low or otherwise perform poorly on RightShip evaluations or other vetting processes conducted by charterers, it could lead to the loss of approval to conduct business with us and in turn the loss of revenue under existing charters or future chartering opportunities.

Our continuous compliance with existing and new standards and quality requirements is vital for our operations. Related risks could materialize in multiple ways, including a sudden and unexpected breach in quality and/or compliance concerning one or more vessels and/or a continuous decrease in the quality concerning one or more vessels occurring over time. For instance, in June 2021, the IMO, working with the Marine Environmental Protection Committee, passed amendments to Annex VI aimed at reducing carbon emissions produced by vessels and include two new metrics for measuring a vessel’s overall energy efficiency and actual carbon dioxide emissions: Energy Efficiency Existing Shipping Index (“EEXI”) and Carbon Intensity Indicator (“CII”). If our vessels are only able to comply with the maximum EEXI and CII thresholds by reducing their speed, our vessels may be less attractive to charterers, and we may only be able to charter our vessels for lower charter rates or to less creditworthy charters, if we are able to do so at all. Non-compliance by us, either suddenly or over a period of time, or an increase in requirements by our charterers above and beyond what we deliver, may have a material adverse effect on our future performance, results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

We are subject to regulations and liability under environmental laws that require significant expenditures, which can affect the ability and competitiveness of our vessels to trade, our results of operations and financial condition.

Our business and the operation of our vessels are regulated under international conventions, national, state and local laws and regulations in force in the jurisdictions in which our vessels operate, as well as in the country or countries of their registration, in order to protect against potential environmental impacts. Regulations of vessels, particularly environmental regulations have become more stringent and are expected to be further revised and become stricter in the future, including air emissions (nitrogen and sulfur oxides, particulate matter, etc.), marine pollution, BWTS implementation, GHG emissions, etc. As a result, significant capital expenditures may be required on our vessels to keep them in compliance, and we may be required to pay increased prices for newbuild and secondhand vessels that meet these requirements. See “Business-Environmental and Other Regulations” for more information.

In addition, the heightened environmental, quality and security concerns of the public, regulators, insurance underwriters, financing sources and charterers may generally lead to additional regulatory requirements, including enhanced risk assessment and security requirements, greater inspection, and safety requirements on all vessels in the marine transportation markets and possibly restrictions on the emissions of greenhouse gases from the operation of vessels. These requirements are likely to add incremental costs to our operations and the failure to comply with these requirements may affect the ability of our vessels to obtain and, possibly, collect on insurance or to obtain the required certificates for entry into the different ports where we operate. We could also

28

incur material liabilities, including cleanup obligations and claims for natural resource, personal injury and property damages in the event that there is a release of petroleum or other hazardous materials from our vessels or otherwise in connection with our operations. Violations of, or liabilities under, environmental regulations can result in substantial penalties, fines and other sanctions, including, in certain instances, seizure or detention of our vessels. Any such actual or alleged environmental laws regulations and policies violation, under negligence, willful misconduct or fault, could result in substantial fines, civil and/or criminal penalties or curtailment of operations in certain jurisdictions, and might adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. In addition, actual or alleged violations could damage our reputation and ability to do business. Furthermore, detecting, investigating and resolving actual or alleged violations is expensive and can consume significant time and attention of our senior management. Events of this nature would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Environmental regulations in relation to climate change and greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions may increase operational and financial restrictions, and environmental compliance costs and our non–scrubber fitted vessels may face difficulties in competing with scrubber-fitted vessels.

GHG reduction measures adopted, or further additional measures to be adopted by the IMO, EU and other jurisdictions for achieving 2030 goals may impose operational and financial restrictions, carbon taxes or an emission trading system on less efficient vessels starting from 2023, gradually affecting younger vessels, even newbuilds after 2030, reducing their trade and competitiveness, increasing their environmental compliance costs, imposing additional energy efficiency investments, or even making such vessels obsolete. This or other developments may lead to environmental taxation affecting less energy efficient vessels, reduce their trade and competitiveness and make certain vessels in our fleet obsolete, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. See “Business-Environmental and Other Regulations” for more information.

Our vessels are not retrofitted with scrubbers and need to use low sulfur fuel containing 0.5% sulfur content, which is currently more expensive than standard marine fuel containing 3.5% sulfur content. If the cost differential between low sulfur fuel and high sulfur fuel is significantly higher than anticipated, or if low sulfur fuel is not available at ports on certain trading routes, it may not be feasible or competitive to operate vessels on certain trading routes without installing scrubbers or without incurring deviation time to obtain compliant fuel. Our vessels may therefore face difficulties in competing with vessels equipped with scrubbers.

Our vessels are subject to periodic inspections by a classification society.

The hull and machinery of every commercial vessel must be classed by a classification society authorized by its country of registry. The classification society certifies that a vessel is safe and seaworthy in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the country of registry of the vessel and the Safety of Life at Sea Convention. Our fleet is currently classed with Lloyds Register of Shipping and Bureau Veritas.

A vessel must undergo annual surveys, intermediate surveys and special surveys. In lieu of a special survey, a vessel’s machinery may be on a continuous survey cycle, under which the machinery would be surveyed periodically over a five-year period. Our vessels are on special survey cycles for hull inspection and continuous survey cycles for machinery inspection. Every vessel is also required to be dry docked every two to three years for inspection of the underwater parts of such vessel. However, for vessels not exceeding 15 years that have means to facilitate underwater inspection in lieu of dry docking, the dry docking may be skipped and be conducted concurrently with the special survey.

If a vessel does not maintain its class and/or fails any annual survey, intermediate survey or special survey, the vessel will be unable to trade between ports and will be unemployable; we would then be in violation of covenants in our insurance contracts, and any future loan agreements or other financing arrangements. This would adversely impact our operations and revenues.

29

Changes in fuel, or bunker, prices may adversely affect profits.

While we do not bear the cost of fuel or bunkers under time and bareboat charters, fuel is a significant expense in our shipping operations when vessels are deployed under spot charters. The cost of fuel, including the fuel efficiency or capability to use lower priced fuel, can also be an important factor considered by charterers in negotiating charter rates. Changes in the price of fuel may adversely affect our profitability. The price and supply of fuel is unpredictable and fluctuates based on events outside our control, including geopolitical developments, supply and demand for oil and gas, actions by the OPEC (“Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries”) and other oil and gas producers, war and unrest in oil producing countries and regions, regional production patterns and environmental concerns. Furthermore, fuel may become significantly more expensive in the future, which may reduce our profitability. In addition, the recent entry into force, on January 1, 2020, of the 0.5% global sulfur cap in marine fuels used by vessels that are not equipped with scrubbers under the International Convention for Prevention of Pollution from Ships (“MARPOL”) Annex VI may lead to changes in the production quantities and prices of different grades of marine fuel by refineries and introduces an additional element of uncertainty in fuel markets, which could result in additional costs and adversely affect our cash flows, earnings and results from operations.

Maritime claimants could arrest our vessels, which could interrupt our cash flow.

Crew members, suppliers of goods and services to a vessel, shippers of cargo and others may be entitled to a maritime lien against that vessel for unsatisfied debts, claims or damages. In many jurisdictions, a maritime lien holder may enforce its lien by arresting a vessel through foreclosure proceedings. The arrest or attachment of one or more of our vessels could interrupt our cash flow and require us to pay large sums of funds to have the arrest lifted.

In addition, in some jurisdictions, such as South Africa, under the “sister ship” theory of liability, a claimant may arrest both the vessel which is subject to the claimant’s maritime lien and any “associated” vessel, which is any vessel owned or controlled by the same owner. Claimants could try to assert “sister ship” liability against one vessel in our fleet for claims relating to another of our ships or, possibly, another vessel managed by Brave Maritime.

Governments could requisition our vessels during a period of war or emergency, resulting in loss of revenues.

A government could requisition for title or seize our vessels. Requisition for title occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and becomes the owner. Also, a government could requisition our vessels for hire. Requisition for hire occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and effectively becomes the charterer at dictated charter rates. Generally, requisitions occur during a period of war or emergency. Government requisition of one or more of our vessels would adversely impact our operations and revenues, thereby resulting in loss of revenues.

Risks involved with operating ocean-going vessels could affect our business and reputation, which would adversely affect our revenues and stock price.

The operation of an ocean-going vessel carries inherent risks. These risks include the possibility of:

30

Any of these circumstances or events could increase our costs or lower our revenues. The involvement of our vessels in a serious accident could harm our reputation as a safe and reliable vessel operator and lead to a loss of business.

The operation of drybulk vessels has particular operational risks.

The operation of drybulk vessels has certain unique risks. With a drybulk vessel, the cargo itself and its interaction with the vessel can be an operational risk. By their nature, drybulk cargoes are often heavy, dense, easily shifted, and react badly to water exposure. In addition, drybulk vessels are often subjected to battering treatment during discharging operations with grabs, jackhammers (to pry encrusted cargoes out of the hold) and small bulldozers. This treatment may cause damage to the vessel. Vessels damaged due to treatment during discharging procedures may affect a vessel’s seaworthiness while at sea. Hull fractures in drybulk vessels may lead to the flooding of the vessels’ holds. If a drybulk vessel suffers flooding in its forward holds, the bulk cargo may become so dense and waterlogged that its pressure may buckle the vessel’s bulkheads, leading to the loss of a vessel. If we are unable to adequately maintain our drybulk vessels and other vessels we may acquire, we may be unable to prevent these events. Any of these circumstances or events could negatively impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our vessels may suffer damage and we may face unexpected repair costs, which could affect our cash flow and financial condition.

If our vessels suffer damages, they may need to be repaired at a shipyard facility. The costs of repairs are unpredictable and can be substantial. For example, the conflict in Ukraine may increase the risk that our vessels may suffer damages or face unexpected repair costs, and increase the cost of war risk insurance premiums. We may have to pay repair costs that our insurance does not cover. The loss of earnings while these vessels are being repaired and repositioned, as well as the actual cost of these repairs, would have an adverse effect on our cash flow and financial condition. We do not intend to carry business interruption insurance.

Acts of piracy on ocean-going vessels could adversely affect our business.

Acts of piracy have historically affected ocean-going vessels trading in regions of the world such as the South China Sea, the Indian Ocean and in the Gulf of Aden, off the coast of Somalia. If these piracy attacks occur in regions in which our vessels are deployed and are characterized by insurers as “war risk” zones, as the Gulf of Aden continues to be, or Joint War Committee (JWC) “war and strikes” listed areas, premiums payable for such coverage, for which we are responsible with respect to vessels employed on spot charters, but not vessels employed on bareboat or time charters, could increase significantly and such insurance coverage may be more difficult to obtain. In addition, crew costs, including employing onboard security guards, could increase in such circumstances. We usually employ armed guards on board the vessels on time and spot charters that transit areas where Somali pirates operate. We may not be adequately insured to cover losses from these incidents, which could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, detention hijacking as a result of an act of piracy against our vessels, or an increase in cost, or unavailability of insurance for our vessels, could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

World events, including terrorist attacks, international hostilities and potential disruption of shipping routes due to events outside of our control, including the conflict in Ukraine, could negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We conduct most of our operations outside of the U.S. and our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to pay dividends, if any, in the future may be adversely affected by changing

31

economic, political and government conditions in the countries and regions where our vessels are employed or registered. Moreover, we operate in a sector of the economy that is likely to be adversely impacted by the effects of political conflicts, including the current political instability in the Middle East, North Africa and other countries and geographic areas, terrorist or other attacks and war or international hostilities. Terrorist attacks and the continuing response of the U.S. and others to these attacks, as well as the threat of future terrorist attacks around the world, continues to cause uncertainty in the world’s financial markets and may affect our business, operating results and financial condition. Continuing conflicts and recent developments in the Middle East, including the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the escalation of conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and the presence of U.S. or other armed forces in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and various other regions, may lead to additional acts of terrorism and armed conflict around the world, which may contribute to further economic instability in the global financial markets. These uncertainties could also adversely affect our ability to obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to us or at all. In the past, political conflicts have also resulted in attacks on vessels, mining of waterways and other efforts to disrupt international shipping, particularly in the Arabian Gulf region. These types of attacks have also affected vessels trading in regions such as the Black Sea, South China Sea and the Gulf of Aden off the coast of Somalia. The Company is still taking ships through the Suez Canal, and there is a high risk that Houthis might attack our vessels. Although our vessels are insured, there is a risk that insurers may deny cover, or delay payment if an attack does take place, which attack could destroy our ships or partially damage them. The IMO’s extraordinary council session held on 10th and 11th March 2022, addressed the impacts on shipping and seafarers, as a result of the conflict in the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov. The IMO called for the need to preserve the integrity of maritime supply chains and the safety and welfare of seafarers and any spillover effects of the military action on global shipping, logistics and supply chains, in particular the impacts on the delivery of commodities and food to developing nations and the impacts on energy supplies. Any of these occurrences could have a material adverse impact on our operating results, revenues and costs.

The conflict between Russia and Ukraine, which commenced in February 2022, has disrupted supply chains and caused instability and significant volatility in the global economy. Much uncertainty remains regarding the global impact of the conflict in Ukraine, and it is possible that such instability, uncertainty and resulting volatility could significantly increase our costs and adversely affect our business, including our ability to secure charters and financing on attractive terms, and as a result, adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operation and cash flows.

As a result of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, Switzerland, the US, the EU, the UK and others have announced unprecedented levels of sanctions and other measures against Russia and certain Russian entities and nationals. Such sanctions against Russia may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operation and cash flows. For example, apart from the immediate commercial disruptions caused in the conflict zone, escalating tensions among the two countries and fears of potential shortages in the supply of Russian crude have caused the price of oil to trade at high levels. The ongoing conflict could result in the imposition of further economic sanctions against Russia, with uncertain impacts on the drybulk carrier and tanker markets and the world economy. While we do not have any Ukrainian or Russian crew, our vessels currently do sail in the Black Sea and we otherwise conduct limited operations in Russia and Ukraine, it is possible that the conflict in Ukraine, including any increased shipping costs, disruptions of global shipping routes, any impact on the global supply chain and any impact on current or potential customers caused by the events in Russia and Ukraine, could adversely affect our operations or financial performance.

Political uncertainty and an increase in trade protectionism could have a material adverse impact on our charterers’ business and, in turn, could cause a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Our operations expose us to the risk that increased trade protectionism from China, other countries in the Asian region, the United States or other nations will adversely affect our business. If the global recovery is undermined by downside risks and the economic downturn returns, or if the regulatory environment otherwise dictates, governments may turn to trade barriers to protect their domestic industries against foreign imports,

32

thereby depressing the demand for shipping. Specifically, increasing trade protectionism affecting the markets that our charterers serve may cause (i) a decrease in cargoes available to our charterers in favor of domestic charterers and domestically owned ships and (ii) an increase in the risks associated with importing goods to such markets. For instance, the government of China has implemented economic policies aimed at increasing domestic consumption of Chinese-made goods and restricting currency exchanges within China. Further, on January 23, 2017, former President Trump signed an executive order withdrawing the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a global trade agreement intended to include the United States, Canada, Mexico, Peru and a number of Asian countries. Further, in January 2019, the United States announced expanded sanctions against Venezuela, which may have an effect on its oil output and in turn affect global oil supply. Throughout 2018 and 2019, former President Trump called for substantial changes to foreign trade policy with China and raised, and proposed to further raise in the future, tariffs on several Chinese goods in order to reverse what he perceived as unfair trade practices that have negatively impacted U.S. businesses. The announcement of such tariffs has triggered retaliatory actions from foreign governments, including China, and may trigger retaliatory actions by other foreign governments, which resulted in a “trade war.” The trade war has had the effect of reducing the supply of goods available for import or export and has therefore resulted in a decrease in demand for shipping. On January 15, 2020, the United States and China signed the Phase One Deal, agreeing to the rollback of tariffs, expansion of trade purchases, and renewed commitments on intellectual property, technology transfer, and currency practices deescalating the trade war. Under the Phase One Deal the U.S. has committed to reduce tariffs from 15 % to 7.5% on US$120 billion worth of goods and China has agreed to halve tariffs on 1,717 U.S. goods, lowering the tariff on some items from 10% to 5%, and others from 5 % to 2.5 %, which both took effect on February 14, 2020. U.S. President Biden has stated that there are no immediate plans to cancel the Phase One Deal, but the administration is expected to make changes to the U.S.-China tariff policies.

There is no certainty that the de-escalation of the trade war between the U.S. and China will continue and there is no certainty that additional tariffs will not be imposed by the U.S. or China. Should the de-escalation of the trade war discontinue or an increase in trade barriers or restrictions on trade occur or be perceived to become likely, such events may have an adverse effect on global market conditions, may have an adverse impact on global trade and our charterers’ business, operating results and financial condition and could thereby affect their ability to make timely charter hire payments to us and to renew and increase the number of their time charters with us. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Increased inspection procedures, tighter import and export controls and new security regulations could increase costs and cause disruption of our business.

International shipping is subject to security and customs inspection and related procedures in countries of origin, destination and trans-shipment points. Under the U.S. Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002 (the “MTSA”), the United States Coast Guard (“USCG”) issued regulations requiring the implementation of certain security requirements aboard vessels operating in waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and at certain ports and facilities. These security procedures can result in the seizure of contents of our vessels, delays in the loading, offloading, trans-shipment or delivery and the levying of customs duties, fines or other penalties against us. Changes to inspection procedures could impose additional financial and legal obligations on us, could also impose additional costs and obligations on our customers and may, in certain cases, render the shipment of certain types of cargo uneconomical or impractical. These additional costs could reduce the volume of goods shipped, resulting in a decreased demand for vessels and have a negative effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and our ability to pay dividends.

33

Changes in labor laws and regulations, collective bargaining negotiations and labor disputes, and potential challenges for crew availability due to the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, could increase our crew costs and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to pay dividends.

Crew costs are a significant expense for us under our charters. There is a limited supply of well-qualified crew. We bear crewing costs under our charters. Increases in crew costs may adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, labor disputes or unrest, including work stoppages, strikes and/or work disruptions or increases imposed by collective bargaining agreements covering the majority of our officers on board our vessels could result in higher personnel costs and significantly affect our financial performance. Furthermore, while we do not have any Ukrainian or Russian crew, the Company’s vessels currently do sail in the Black Sea and the Company otherwise conducts limited operations in Russia and Ukraine, the extent to which this will impact the Company’s future results of operations and financial condition will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted. Changes in labor laws and regulations, collective bargaining negotiations and labor disputes, and potential shortage of crew due to the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, could increase our crew costs and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

The smuggling of drugs or other contraband onto our vessels may lead to governmental claims against us.

Our vessels call in ports in certain geographic areas where smugglers attempt to hide drugs and other contraband on vessels, with or without the knowledge of crew members. To the extent our vessels are found with contraband, whether inside or attached to the hull of our vessel and whether with or without the knowledge of any of our crew, we may face governmental or other regulatory claims or penalties which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Our vessels may call on ports located in countries that are subject to sanctions and embargoes imposed by the U.S. or other governments, which could adversely affect our reputation and the market for our Common Shares.

From time to time on charterers’ instructions, our vessels have called and may again call on ports located in countries subject to sanctions and embargoes imposed by the United States government and countries identified by the United States government as state sponsors of terrorism, such as Iran, Syria and North Korea. The U.S. sanctions and embargo laws and regulations vary in their application, as they do not all apply to the same covered persons or proscribe the same activities, and such sanctions and embargo laws and regulations may be amended or strengthened over time. On January 16, 2016, “Implementation Day” for the Iran Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the United States lifted its nuclear-related secondary sanctions against Iran which prohibited certain conduct by non-U.S. companies and individuals that occurred entirely outside of U.S. jurisdiction involving specified industry sectors in Iran, including the energy, petrochemical, automotive, financial, banking, mining, shipbuilding and shipping sectors. By lifting the secondary sanctions against Iran, the U.S. government effectively removed U.S. imposed restraints on dealings by non-U.S. companies, such as our Company, and individuals with these formerly targeted Iranian business sectors.

Non-U.S. companies continued to be prohibited under U.S. sanctions from (i) knowingly engaging in conduct that seeks to evade U.S. restrictions on transactions or dealings with Iran or that causes the export of goods or services from the United States to Iran, (ii) exporting, re-exporting or transferring to Iran any goods, technology, or services originally exported from the U.S. and / or subject to U.S. export jurisdiction and (iii) conducting transactions with of the Iranian or Iran-related individuals and entities that remain or are placed in the future on OFAC’s list of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN List), notwithstanding the lifting of secondary sanctions. However, on August 6, 2018, the U.S. re-imposed an initial round of secondary sanctions and as of November 5, 2018, all of the secondary sanctions the U.S. had suspended under the JCPOA were re-imposed.

The U.S. government’s primary Iran sanctions have remained largely unchanged, including during the period from the JCPOA Implementation Day to the re-imposition of secondary sanctions in 2018, and as a

34

consequence, U.S. persons also continue to be broadly prohibited from engaging in transactions or dealings with the Government of Iran and Iranian financial institutions, which effectively impacts the transfer of funds to, from, or through the U.S. financial system whether denominated in US dollars or any other currency.

We believe all of our vessels port calls have been made in full compliance with applicable economic sanctions laws and regulations, including those of the United States, the EU and other relevant jurisdictions. Our charter agreements include provisions that restrict trades of our vessels to countries targeted by economic sanctions unless such transportation activities involving sanctioned countries are permitted under applicable economic sanctions and embargo regimes. Our ordinary chartering policy is to seek to include similar provisions in all of our period charters. Prior to agreeing to waive existing charter party restrictions on carrying cargoes to or from ports that may implicate sanctions risks, we ensure that the charterers have proof of compliance with international and U.S. sanctions requirements, or applicable licenses or other exemptions.

Although we believe that we are in compliance with all applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations and intend to maintain such compliance, there can be no assurance that we will be in compliance in the future, particularly as the scope of certain laws may vary or may be subject to changing interpretations, and sanctions imposed by different countries conflict to some extent, and we may be unable to prevent our charterers from violating contractual and legal restrictions on their operations of the vessels. Any such violation could result in fines or other penalties for us and could result in some investors deciding, or being required, to divest their interest, or not to invest, in the Company. Additionally, some investors may decide to divest their interest, or not to invest, in the Company simply because we, or our affiliates, do business with companies that do lawful business in sanctioned countries. Moreover, our charterers may violate applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations as a result of actions that do not involve us or our vessels, and those violations could in turn negatively affect our reputation. Investor perception of the value of our Common Shares may also be adversely affected by the consequences of war, the effects of terrorism, civil unrest and governmental actions in these and surrounding countries. In particular, the ongoing conflict in Ukraine could result in the imposition of further economic sanctions by the United States and the European Union against Russia and regions of Ukraine.

Failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other anti-bribery legislation in other jurisdictions could result in fines, criminal penalties, contract terminations and an adverse effect on our business.

We operate in a number of countries through the world, including countries that may be known to have a reputation for corruption. We are committed to doing business in accordance with applicable anti-corruption laws and have adopted policies which are consistent and in full compliance with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (the “FCPA”) and other anti-bribery laws. We are subject, however, to the risk that we, our affiliated entities or their respective officers, directors, employees and agents may take actions determined to be in violation of such anti-corruption laws, including the FCPA. Any such violation could result in substantial fines, sanctions, civil and/or criminal penalties, curtailment of operations in certain jurisdictions, and might adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. In addition, actual or alleged violations could damage our reputation and ability to do business. Furthermore, detecting, investigating, and resolving actual or alleged violations is expensive and can consume significant time and attention of our senior management.

A cyber-attack could materially disrupt our business.

Our business operations could be targeted by individuals or groups seeking to sabotage or disrupt our information technology systems and networks, or to steal data. A successful cyber-attack could materially disrupt our operations, including the safety of our operations, or lead to unauthorized release of information or alteration of information on our systems. Any such attack or other breach of our information technology systems could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

35

Seasonal fluctuations in industry demand could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and the amount of available cash with which we can pay dividends.

We operate our vessels in markets that have historically exhibited seasonal variations in demand and, as a result, in charter rates. Seasonality is related to several factors and may result in quarter-to-quarter volatility in our results of operations, which could affect the amount of dividends, if any, that we may pay to our shareholders. For example, the market for marine drybulk transportation services is typically stronger in the fall months in anticipation of increased consumption of coal in the northern hemisphere during the winter months and the grain export season from North America. Similarly, the market for marine drybulk transportation services is typically stronger in the spring months in anticipation of the South American grain export season due to increased distance traveled by vessels to their end destination known as ton mile effect, as well as increased coal imports in parts of Asia due to additional electricity demand for cooling during the summer months. Demand for marine drybulk transportation services is typically weaker at the beginning of the calendar year and during the summer months. In addition, unpredictable weather patterns during these periods tend to disrupt vessel scheduling and supplies of certain commodities. Tanker markets are typically stronger in the winter months as a result of increased oil consumption in the northern hemisphere, but weaker in the summer months as a result of lower oil consumption in the northern hemisphere and refinery maintenance. In addition, unpredictable weather patterns in these months tend to disrupt vessel scheduling and supplies of certain commodities. This seasonality could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related To Our Business

Our fleet consists of two drybulk carriers and one Aframax tanker. The small size of our fleet and any limitation in the availability or operation of these vessels could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our fleet consists of two Handysize drybulk carriers and one Aframax tanker. Unless and until we identify and acquire additional vessels, we will depend upon these three vessels for all of our revenue. If any of our vessels are unable to generate revenues as a result of off-hire time, early termination of the applicable charter or otherwise, our business, results of operations financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

In addition, due to the relatively small size of our fleet we may face additional difficulty arranging debt financing from lenders to fund the expansion of our fleet, or refinance then existing debt upon maturity or otherwise, on favorable terms or at all and achieving acceptance from top tier charterers, which increasingly seek to do business with established shipping companies with substantial resources.

We are dependent on the ability and willingness of our charterers to honor their commitments to us for all our revenues.

We derive all our revenues from the payment of charter hire by charterers of our vessels. The ability and willingness of each of our counterparties to perform their obligations under charter agreements with us will depend on a number of factors that are beyond our control and may include, among other things, general economic conditions, the condition of the drybulk carrier sector of the shipping industry or the condition of the crude tanker sector of the shipping industry, as applicable, and the overall financial condition of the counterparties. In addition, in depressed market conditions, charterers may seek to renegotiate their charters or may default on their obligations under charters and our charterers may fail to pay charter hire or attempt to renegotiate charter rates. Should a counterparty fail to honor its obligations under agreements with us, it may be difficult to secure substitute employment for such vessel, and any new charter arrangements we secure in the spot market or on bareboat or time charters could be at lower rates. If we lose a charter, we may be unable to re-deploy the related vessel on terms as favorable to us. We would not receive any revenues from such a vessel while it remained unchartered, but we may be required to pay expenses necessary to maintain the vessel in proper operating condition, insure it and service any indebtedness secured by such vessel. The failure by charterers to meet their obligations to us or an attempt by charterers to renegotiate our charter agreements could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, results of operations and financial condition.

36

Employment of our vessels on time or bareboat charters may prevent us from taking advantage of rising spot charter rates.

The spot market for drybulk carriers may fluctuate significantly based upon drybulk carrier supply and demand and the spot market for Aframax tankers may fluctuate significantly based upon tanker supply and demand. The factors affecting supply and demand for drybulk carriers and Aframax tankers are outside of our control, and the nature, timing and degree of changes in industry conditions are unpredictable. We currently have both of our drybulk vessels under time charter employment of short duration and our tanker operating in the spot market. We expect that we will continue to seek to employ vessels in the spot market, if market conditions seem favorable. If we employ our vessels on time and bareboat charters, the charter rates for such vessels will be fixed for a specified time period. We cannot assure you that charter rates will not increase during the period of such employment. If our vessels are employed on time or bareboat charters during a period of rising spot market charter rates, we would be unable to pursue opportunities to charter our vessels at such higher charter rates.

Charters at attractive rates may not be available when the charters for our vessels expire, which would have an adverse impact on our revenues and financial condition.

As of March 1, 2024, our two drybulk Handysize vessels were under time charter contracts expiring in April 2024, and our crude oil tanker was operating in the spot market. We will be exposed to prevailing charter rates in the drybulk carrier and crude oil tanker sectors, as applicable, when our vessels existing charters expire, and in the future to the extent the counterparties to our fixed-rate time or bareboat charter contracts fail to honor their obligations to us. The successful operation of our vessels in the competitive and highly volatile spot charter market will depend on, among other things, obtaining profitable spot charters, which depends greatly on vessel supply and demand, and minimizing, to the extent possible, time spent waiting for charters and time spent traveling unladen to pick up cargo. When the current charters for our fleet expire or are terminated, it may not be possible to re-charter these vessels at similar rates, or at all, or to secure charters for any vessels we agree to acquire at similarly profitable rates, or at all. As a result, we may have to accept lower rates or experience off hire time for our vessels, which would adversely impact our revenues, results of operations and financial condition.

We depend upon a few significant customers, due to the small size of our fleet, for our revenues. The loss of one or more of these customers could adversely affect our financial performance.

We derive a significant part of our revenue from a small number of charterers. We anticipate a limited number of customers will continue to represent significant amounts of our revenue. If these customers cease doing business or do not fulfill their obligations under the charters of our vessels, due to the increasing financial pressure on these customers or otherwise, our results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected. Further, if we encounter any difficulties in our relationships with these charterers, our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Technological innovation could reduce our charter hire income and the value of our vessels.

The charter hire rates and the value and operational life of a vessel are determined by a number of factors including the vessel’s efficiency, operational flexibility and physical life. Efficiency includes speed, fuel economy and the ability to load and discharge cargo quickly, including the ability to use alternative combustion fuels. Flexibility includes the ability to enter harbors, utilize related docking facilities and pass through canals and straits. The length of a vessel’s physical life is related to its original design and construction, its maintenance and the impact of the stress of operations. More technologically advanced vessels have been built since our vessels, which have an average age of 13.6 years as of March 1, 2024, were constructed and vessels with further advancements may be built that are even more efficient or more flexible or have longer physical lives, including new vessels powered by alternative fuels or which are otherwise perceived as more environmentally friendly by charterers. Competition from these more technologically advanced vessels could adversely affect the

37

amount of charter hire payments we receive for our vessels, and the resale value of our vessels could significantly decrease, which could also result in impairment costs. In these circumstances, we may also be forced to charter our vessels to less creditworthy charterers, either because top tier charters will not charter older and less technologically advanced vessels or will only charter such vessels at lower contracted charter rates than we are able to obtain from these less creditworthy, second tier charterers. Consequently, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

The aging of our fleet may result in our vessels being less attractive to charterers and in increased operating costs in the future, which could adversely affect our earnings.

Our fleet’s average age, which as of March 1, 2024 was approximately 13.6 years, equals the average age of our drybulk carriers and our tanker vessel. These are above the average age of the drybulk and tanker carrier fleet, and as our vessels’ age, we may have difficulty competing with younger, more technologically advanced drybulk carriers and crude oil tankers, as applicable, for charters from top-tier charterers. In general, the costs to maintain a vessel in good operating condition increase with the age of the vessel. Older vessels are typically less fuel-efficient and more costly to maintain than more recently constructed vessels due to improvements in engine technology. Cargo insurance rates also increase with the age of a vessel, as do charterer’s concerns regarding the perceived reliability of the vessel’s technical performance. As a result, older vessels are generally less desirable to charterers, particularly more creditworthy charterers.

Unless we set aside reserves for vessel replacement, at the end of a vessel’s useful life, our revenue will decline, which would adversely affect our cash flows and income.

As of March 1, 2024, the vessels in our fleet had an average age of approximately 13.6 years. Unless we maintain cash reserves for vessel replacement, we may be unable to replace the vessels in our fleet upon the expiration of their useful lives. We estimate the useful life of our vessels to be 25 years from the completion of their construction. Our cash flows and income are dependent on the revenues we earn by chartering our vessels to customers. If we are unable to replace the vessels in our fleet upon the expiration of their useful lives, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected. Any reserves set aside for vessel replacement would not be available for other cash needs or dividends, if any.

We will need to obtain substantial additional funds for the remaining purchase price obligation for our Aframax tanker.

We expect to finance the $38.7 million remaining acquisition consideration for our Aframax tanker, which is payable by July 14, 2024, with cash on hand, cashflow from operations, possible proceeds from equity offerings and possibly the incurrence of senior secured bank debt. Financing this amount will, in addition to requiring that we dedicate a significant portion of our cash from operations, likely require us to raise additional amounts from issuances of our securities or bank borrowings which we would need to seek to arrange. If financing is not available when needed, including potentially through equity financings or bank borrrowings, or is available only on unfavorable terms, we may be unable to meet our purchase price payment obligations.

Our future financing arrangements may contain, restrictive covenants that may limit our liquidity and corporate activities.

We expect our future financing arrangements may, impose, operating and financial restrictions on us. These restrictions may limit our ability to:

38

Our future credit facilities will require us to maintain specified financial ratios, satisfy financial covenants and contain cross-default clauses. As a result of the restrictions in our future financing arrangements we may enter into with respect to future vessels which we have yet to identify, we may need to seek permission from our lenders in order to engage in some corporate actions. Our lenders’ interests may be different from ours, and we may not be able to obtain their permission when needed. This may prevent us from taking actions that we believe are in our best interest which may adversely impact our revenues, results of operations and financial condition.

A failure by us to meet our payment and other obligations, including our financial covenants and security coverage requirement, could lead to defaults under our secured loan agreements. Our lenders could then accelerate our indebtedness and foreclose on our fleet. The loss of our vessels would mean we could not run our business.

The market values of our vessels may decrease, which could cause us to breach covenants in our future credit facilities, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our future credit facilities, which will be secured by liens on our vessels, will likely contain various financial covenants, including requirements that relate to our financial condition, operating performance and liquidity. For example, we may be required to maintain a maximum consolidated leverage ratio that is based, in part, upon the market value of the vessels securing the applicable loan, as well as a minimum ratio of the market value of vessels securing a loan to the principal amount outstanding under such loan. The market value of drybulk carriers and tankers is sensitive to, among other things, changes in the drybulk carrier and tanker charter markets, respectively, with vessel values deteriorating in times when drybulk carrier charter rates or tanker charter rates, as applicable, are falling and improving when charter rates are anticipated to rise. Lower charter rates coupled with the difficulty in obtaining financing for vessel purchases have adversely affected drybulk carrier and tanker values in the recent past. A return of these conditions could lead to a significant decline in the fair market values of our vessels, which may affect our ability to comply with these loan covenants. If the value of our vessels deteriorates, we may have to record an impairment adjustment in our financial statements which would adversely affect our financial results and could further hinder our ability to raise capital.

A failure to comply with our future covenants and/or obtain covenant waivers or modifications could result in our lenders requiring us to post additional collateral, enhance our equity and liquidity, increase our interest payments or pay down our indebtedness to a level where we are in compliance with our loan covenants, sell vessels in our fleet or accelerate our indebtedness, which would impair our ability to continue to conduct our business. If our indebtedness is accelerated, we may not be able to refinance our debt or obtain additional financing and could lose our vessels if our lenders foreclose their liens. In addition, if we find it necessary to sell our vessels at a time when vessel prices are low, we will recognize losses and a reduction in our earnings, which could affect our ability to raise additional capital necessary for us to comply with our loan agreements.

Our ability to obtain additional debt financing may be dependent on the performance of our then existing charters and the creditworthiness of our charterers, as well as the perceived impact of emissions by our vessels on the climate.

The actual or perceived credit quality of our charterers, and any defaults by them, may materially affect our ability to obtain the additional capital resources that we will require in order to purchase additional vessels or

39

may significantly increase our costs of obtaining such capital. Our inability to obtain additional financing, or obtain financing at a higher than anticipated cost may materially affect our results of operation and our ability to implement our business strategy.

In 2019, a number of leading lenders to the shipping industry and other industry participants announced a global framework by which financial institutions can assess the climate alignment of their ship finance portfolios, called the Poseidon Principles, and additional lenders have subsequently announced their intention to adhere to such principles. If the ships in our fleet are deemed not to satisfy the emissions and other sustainability standards contemplated by the Poseidon Principles, or other Environmental Social Governance (ESG) standards required by lenders or investors, the availability and cost of bank financing for such vessels may be adversely affected.

A significant increase in our debt levels may adversely affect us and our cash flows.

We do not currently have any outstanding indebtedness, however, we may incur indebtedness in connection with financing the remaining purchase price for our Aframax tanker, which is payable by July 14, 2024, and any further expansion of our fleet, and possibly to refinance our existing vessels with debt secured by such vessels.

An increase in the level of indebtedness and the need to service the indebtedness may impact our profitability and cash available for growth of our fleet, working capital and dividends if any. Additionally, any further increases in interest rate levels, which have in the last couple of years increased significantly from historically low levels, may increase the cost of servicing our indebtedness with similar results.

To finance our future fleet expansion program beyond our current fleet, we expect to incur secured debt. We would then have to dedicate a portion of our cash flow from operations to pay the principal and interest on our debt. These payments would limit funds otherwise available for working capital, capital expenditures, and other purposes, including any distributions of cash to our stockholders, and our inability to service our debt could lead to acceleration of our debt and foreclosure on our fleet.

Moreover, carrying secured indebtedness would expose us to increased risks if the demand for seaborne transportation of drybulk cargoes and/or crude oil decreases and charter rates and vessel values are adversely affected.

We expect to be exposed to volatility in interest rates

We expect debt we incur in the future will be advanced at a floating rate, which can affect the amount of interest payable on our debt, and which, in turn, could have an adverse effect on our earnings and cash flow. In addition, interest rate benchmarks, including SOFR, have increased significantly. Our financial condition could be materially adversely affected at any time that we have not entered into interest rate hedging arrangements to hedge our exposure to the interest rates applicable to our credit facilities and any other financing arrangements we may enter into in the future. Even if we enter into interest rate swaps or other derivative instruments for the purpose of managing our interest rate exposure, our hedging strategies may not be effective and we may incur substantial losses.

The derivative contracts we may enter into to hedge our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates could result in higher than market interest rates and charges against our income, as well as reductions in our stockholders’ equity.

We may enter into interest rate swaps for purposes of managing our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates applicable to indebtedness under our future credit facilities which may be advanced at floating rates. Our hedging strategies, however, may not be effective and we may incur substantial losses if interest rates or currencies move materially differently from our expectations.

40

To the extent our interest rate swaps do not qualify for treatment as hedges for accounting purposes, we recognize fluctuations in the fair value of such contracts in our statement of operations. In addition, changes in the fair value of any derivative contracts that do qualify for treatment as hedges, are recognized in “Accumulated other comprehensive income” on our balance sheet. Our financial condition could also be materially adversely affected to the extent we do not hedge our exposure to interest rate fluctuations under our financing arrangements under which loans have been advanced at a floating rate.

In addition, we may enter in the future into foreign currency derivative contracts in order to hedge an exposure to foreign currencies related to shipbuilding contracts.

Any hedging activities we engage in may not effectively manage our interest rate and foreign exchange exposure or have the desired impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

Inflation could adversely affect our business and financial results.

Inflation could adversely affect our business and financial results by increasing the costs of labor and materials needed to operate our business. During the year ended December 31, 2021 and the year ended December 31, 2022, we experienced increases in vessel operating expenses due to increased costs for crew, due largely to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as moderate increases in spares and stores in 2022 compared to 2021, which costs generally continued to increase in the second half of 2022, before such cost increases stabilized in late 2022 and remained stable up until September 30, 2023. In an inflationary environment such as the current economic environment, depending on the drybulk industry, the tanker industry and other economic conditions, we may be unable to raise our charter rates enough to offset the increasing costs of our operations, which would decrease our profit margins. Inflation may also raise our costs of capital and decrease our purchasing power, making it more difficult to maintain sufficient funds to operate our business. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Inflation.”

Because we generate all of our revenues in U.S. dollars but incur a portion of our expenses in other currencies, exchange rate fluctuations could adversely affect our results of operations.

We generate all of our revenues in U.S. dollars and the majority of our expenses are also in U.S. dollars. However, a relatively small portion of our overall expenses is incurred in Euros, and we also incur executive compensation expense in Euros. This could lead to fluctuations in net income due to changes in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the other currencies, in particular the Euro. Expenses incurred in foreign currencies against which the U.S. dollar falls in value can thereby increase, decreasing our net income.

We are dependent on our relationship with Brave Maritime.

Brave Maritime serves as our commercial and technical manager for the vessels in our fleet. We are accordingly dependent upon our fleet manager, Brave Maritime, for:

The loss of Brave Maritime’s services or its failure to perform its obligations to us properly for financial or other reasons could materially and adversely affect our business and the results of our operations. Although we

41

may have rights against Brave Maritime if it defaults on its obligations to us, you would have no recourse against Brave Maritime. In addition, in such a case or if our management agreement were to be terminated we might not be able to find a replacement manager on terms as favorable as those currently in place with Brave Maritime.

Further, we expect that we will need to seek approval from our lenders under any future financing arrangements we enter into to change our manager. In addition, if Brave Maritime, Stealth Maritime or their affiliates suffers material damage to its reputation or relationships, including as a result of a spill or other environmental incident or an accident, or any violation or alleged violation of U.S., EU or other sanctions, involving ships managed by Brave Maritime or their affiliates whether or not owned by us, it may harm the ability of our company or our subsidiaries to successfully compete in our industry.

Management fees are payable to our Manager regardless of our profitability, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Pursuant to our Management Agreement, we pay our manager a daily ship management fee of $440 per day per vessel for providing commercial, technical and administrative services (see the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Management Fees” for more information). In addition, we pay our manager certain commissions and fees with respect to vessel purchases, sales and newbuilds. The management fees do not cover expenses such as voyage expenses, vessel operating expenses, maintenance expenses, crewing costs, insurance premiums, commissions and certain company administration expenses such as directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, legal and accounting fees and other similar company administration expenses, which are reimbursed or paid by us. The management fees are payable whether or not our vessels are employed, and regardless of our profitability, and we have no ability to require our manager to reduce the management fees if our profitability decreases, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Since our manager, Brave Maritime, is a privately held company and there is little or no publicly available information about it, an investor could have little advance warning of potential financial and other problems that might affect our manager that could have a material adverse effect on us.

We would be materially adversely affected if our manager becomes unable or unwilling to provide services for our benefit at the level of quality they have provided such services to our vessels in the past and at comparable costs as are currently in effect, which are the same as they have charged with respect to our vessels while owned by Imperial Petroleum prior to the Spin-Off. If we were required to employ a ship management company other than our manager, we cannot offer any assurances that the terms of such management agreements would be equally or more beneficial to us in the long term.

Our manager’s ability to render management services depends in part on its own financial strength. Circumstances beyond our control could impair Brave Maritime’s financial strength, and because it is a privately held company, information about its financial strength is not publicly available. As a result, we might have little advance warning of financial or other problems affecting our manager even though their financial or other problems could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our management team has limited experience running a public company, and no member of the Vafias family which founded our predecessor and our manager, serve as an officer of the Company and this may impact the performance of our business and our ability to obtain financing.

While our CEO, Dr. Diamantis Andriotis, has been actively involved in the management and operation of vessels for several years as an employee of Vafias family interests, he has not had prior experience as a CEO of a public company. Our CFO, Nina Pyndiah, has been the internal auditor of StealthGas Inc. since 2006, and has not had prior experience as the CFO or executive officer of a public company. Mr. Harry Vafias, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Imperial Petroleum and a member of the Vafias family who founded

42

Brave Maritime, is not engaged in our day-to-day operations as an officer. Dr. Diamantis Andriotis relies on the experience of Brave Maritime for the management of our vessels, as well as the advice and oversight of the Board of Directors, in his role as our CEO.

The inexperience of our management with operating a public company and the limited involvement of the Vafias family, which has long-standing relationships with lenders and other financing sources in the shipping industry, may make it more difficult for us to obtain bank debt and other financing to fund our operations and growth.

Certain companies affiliated with us and our management manage and own vessels that may compete with our fleet.

Entities affiliated with other members of the Vafias family own vessels that operate in various sectors of the shipping industry, including a number of drybulk carriers and tankers. Accordingly, it is possible that Imperial Petroleum, StealthGas, Stealth Maritime, Brave Maritime or other companies affiliated with the Vafias family or Brave Maritime may face conflicts between their own interests and their obligations to us. These conflicts may arise in connection with the chartering, purchase, sale and operations of the vessels in our fleet versus other vessels in which these persons or entities have an interest. Accordingly, our management and our manager might be faced with conflicts of interest with respect to their own interests and their obligations to us. These conflicts of interests may have an adverse effect on our business and your interests as stockholders.

We may enter into certain significant transactions with companies affiliated with members of the Vafias family which may result in conflicts of interests.

In addition to our management contract with Brave Maritime, a company controlled by members of the Vafias family, from time to time we may enter into other transactions with companies affiliated with members of the Vafias family. Brave Maritime also contracts for the crewing of vessels in our fleet with Hellenic Manning Overseas Inc., which is 25% owned by an affiliate of Brave Maritime. In July 2023, we acquired the Aframax tanker from Imperial Petroleum. Such transactions could create conflicts of interest that could adversely affect our business or your interests as holders of our Common Shares, as well as our financial position, results of operations and our future prospects.

As our fleet grows in size, we will have to improve our operations and financial systems, staff and crew; if we cannot maintain these systems or continue to recruit suitable employees, our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.

As we expand our fleet, we and Brave Maritime will have to invest considerable sums in upgrading its operating and financial systems, as well as hiring additional well-qualified personnel to manage the vessels. In addition, as we expand our fleet, we will have to rely on our technical managers to recruit suitable additional seafarers and shoreside administrative and management personnel. Brave Maritime and those technical managers may not be able to continue to hire suitable employees to the extent we continue to expand our fleet. Our vessels require a technically skilled staff with specialized training. If the technical managers’ crewing agents are unable to employ such technically skilled staff, they may not be able to adequately staff our vessels. If Brave Maritime is unable to operate our financial and operations systems effectively or our technical managers are unable to recruit suitable employees as we expand our fleet, our results of operation and our ability to expand our fleet may be adversely affected.

Delays in the delivery of any newbuilding or secondhand vessels we agree to acquire could harm our operating results.

Delays in the delivery of any new-building or second-hand vessels we may agree to acquire in the future, would delay our receipt of revenues generated by these vessels and, to the extent we have arranged charter

43

employment for these vessels, could possibly result in the cancellation of those charters, and therefore adversely affect our anticipated results of operations. Although this would delay our funding requirements for the installment payments to purchase these vessels, it would also delay our receipt of revenues under any charters we arrange for such vessels. The delivery of newbuilding vessels could be delayed, other than at our request, because of, among other things, work stoppages or other labor disturbances; bankruptcy or other financial crisis of the shipyard building the vessel; hostilities, health pandemics such as COVID-19 or political or economic disturbances in the countries where the vessels are being built, including any escalation of tensions involving North Korea; weather interference or catastrophic event, such as a major earthquake, tsunami or fire; our requests for changes to the original vessel specifications; requests from our customers, with whom we have arranged any charters for such vessels, to delay construction and delivery of such vessels due to weak economic conditions and shipping demand and a dispute with the shipyard building the vessel.

In addition, the refund guarantors under the newbuilding contracts, which are banks, financial institutions and other credit agencies, may also be affected by financial market conditions in the same manner as our lenders and, as a result, may be unable or unwilling to meet their obligations under their refund guarantees. If the shipbuilders or refund guarantors are unable or unwilling to meet their obligations to the sellers of the vessels, this may impact our acquisition of vessels and may materially and adversely affect our operations and our obligations under our credit facilities. The delivery of any secondhand vessels could be delayed because of, among other things, hostilities or political disturbances, non-performance of the purchase agreement with respect to the vessels by the seller, our inability to obtain requisite permits, approvals or financing or damage to or destruction of the vessels while being operated by the seller prior to the delivery date.

If we fail to manage our growth properly, we may not be able to successfully expand our market share.

As and when market conditions permit, we intend to continue to prudently grow our fleet over the long term. The acquisition of such additional vessels could impose significant additional responsibilities on our management and staff, and may necessitate that we, and they, increase the number of personnel. In the future, we may not be able to identify suitable vessels, acquire vessels on advantageous terms or obtain financing for such acquisitions. Any future growth will depend on:

Growing a business by acquisition presents numerous risks such as undisclosed liabilities and obligations, difficulty in obtaining additional qualified personnel, managing relationships with customers and our commercial and technical managers and integrating newly acquired vessels into existing infrastructures. We may not be successful in executing any growth initiatives and may incur significant expenses and losses in connection therewith.

We may be unable to attract and retain key management personnel and other employees in the shipping industry, which may negatively affect the effectiveness of our management and our results of operation.

Our success depends to a significant extent upon the abilities and efforts of our management team, including our Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Diamantis Andriotis and our Chairman, Harry Vafias. In addition, Harry Vafias is a member of the Vafias family, which controls Brave Maritime, our fleet manager. Our success depends upon our and Brave Maritime’s ability to hire and retain qualified managers to oversee our operations. The loss of any of these individuals could adversely affect our business prospects and financial condition. Difficulty in hiring and

44

retaining personnel could adversely affect our results of operations. We do not have employment agreements directly with our key personnel who are employees of Brave Maritime, our fleet manager, although under our management agreement with Brave Maritime, our relationship is governed by terms substantially similar to those typically included in employment agreements. We do not maintain “key man” life insurance on any of our officers.

The international drybulk and tanker shipping industries are highly competitive, and we may not be able to compete successfully for charters with new entrants or established companies with greater resources.

We employ our vessels in a highly competitive market that is capital intensive and highly fragmented. Competition arises primarily from other vessel owners, some of whom have substantially greater resources than we do. Competition for the transportation of drybulk cargo and crude oil by sea is intense and depends on price, customer relationships, operating expertise, professional reputation and size, age, location and condition of the vessel. Due in part to the highly fragmented market, additional competitors with greater resources could enter the drybulk and tanker shipping industries and operate larger fleets through consolidations or acquisitions and may be able to offer lower charter rates than we are able to offer, which could have a material adverse effect on our fleet utilization and, accordingly, our results of operations.

Purchasing and operating previously owned, or secondhand, vessels may result in increased operating costs and vessels off-hire, which could adversely affect our revenues.

Our examination of secondhand vessels, which may not include physical inspection prior to purchase, does not provide us with the same knowledge about their condition and cost of any required (or anticipated) repairs that we would have had if these vessels had been built for and operated exclusively by us. Generally, we do not receive the benefit of warranties on secondhand vessels.

In general, the cost of maintaining a vessel in good operating condition increases with its age. As of March 1, 2024, the average age of the vessels in our fleet was approximately 13.6 years. Older vessels are typically less fuel efficient and more costly to maintain and operate than more recently constructed vessels due to improvements in engine technology. Cargo insurance rates increase with the age of a vessel, making older vessels less desirable to charterers.

Governmental regulations, safety or other equipment standards related to the age of vessels may require expenditures for alterations, or the addition of new equipment, to our vessels and may restrict the type of activities in which the vessels may engage. As our vessels age, market conditions may not justify those expenditures or enable us to operate our vessels profitably during the remainder of their useful lives. If we sell vessels, the sales prices may not equal and could be less than their carrying values at that time and thereby negatively affect our profitability.

The shipping industry has inherent operational risks that may not be adequately covered by our insurance.

We procure hull and machinery insurance, protection and indemnity insurance, which include environmental damage and pollution insurance coverage, and war risk insurance for our fleet. While we endeavor to be adequately insured against all known risks related to the operation of our ships, there remains the possibility that a liability may not be adequately covered and we may not be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage for our fleet in the future. The insurers may also not pay particular claims. Even if our insurance coverage is adequate, we may not be able to timely obtain a replacement vessel in the event of a loss. Our insurance policies contain deductibles for which we will be responsible and limitations and exclusions which may increase our costs or lower our revenue.

We procure hull and machinery insurance, protection and indemnity insurance, which include environmental damage and pollution insurance coverage, war risk and other insurance coverage for our fleet with

45

insurance carriers that also provide insurance coverage for ships owned by affiliated entities, including StealthGas, Imperial Petroleum and private Vafias family interests. Accordingly, if one of our ships, or other ships managed by Brave Maritime or Stealth Maritime and owned by an affiliated entity of Brave Maritime or Stealth Maritime, including StealthGas and Imperial Petroleum, were to incur significant costs from an accident, spill or other environmental liability or were subject to insurance fraud or other incident, our insurance premiums and costs could increase significantly or we may not be able to obtain insurance for our ships. We also maintain directors and officers liability insurance with insurance carriers that also provide similar insurance coverage for affiliated entities including StealthGas and Imperial Petroleum, and any claims under such insurance policies could impact the cost of premiums and availability of our directors and officers insurance.

In addition, if one of our ships, or other ships managed by Brave Maritime or Stealth Maritime and owned by an affiliated entity of Brave Maritime or Stealth Maritime, including StealthGas and Imperial Petroleum, were to incur significant costs from an accident, spill or other environmental liability or were subject to insurance fraud or other incident, our insurance premiums and costs could increase significantly or we may not be able to obtain insurance for our ships.

We are a holding company, and we depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to distribute funds to us in order to satisfy our financial obligations or to make dividend payments, if any.

We are a holding company and our subsidiaries, which are all wholly-owned by us, conduct all of our operations and own all of our operating assets. We have no significant assets other than the equity interests in our wholly-owned subsidiaries. As a result, our ability to make dividend payments to you depends on our subsidiaries and their ability to distribute funds to us. If we are unable to obtain funds from our subsidiaries, we may be unable or our Board of Directors may exercise its discretion not to pay dividends.

We may be subject to lawsuits for damages and penalties.

The nature of our business exposes us to the risk of lawsuits for damages or penalties relating to, among other things, personal injury, property casualty and environmental contamination. From time to time, we may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business, principally personal injury and property casualty claims. We expect that these claims would be covered by insurance, subject to customary deductibles. However, such claims, even if lacking merit, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.

Regulatory and legal risks as a result of our global operations, including with respect to sanctioned countries, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial conditions.

Our global operations increase both the number and the level of complexity of U.S. or foreign laws and regulations applicable to us, some of which can conflict with one another, as is the case, for instance, with certain sanctions issued by U.S., E.U. and U.K., or campaigns by interest group organizations such as United Against Nuclear Iran (UNAI). These laws and regulations include international labor laws; U.S. laws such as the FCPA and other laws and regulations established by the Office of Foreign Assets Control; local laws such as the U.K. Bribery Act 2010; data privacy requirements like the European General Data Protection Regulation, enforceable as of May 25, 2018; and the E.U.-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework, adopted by the European Commission on July 12, 2016. We may inadvertently breach some provisions of those laws and regulations which could result in cease of business activities, criminal sanctions against us, our officers or our employees, fines and materially damage our reputation. In addition, detecting, investigating and resolving such cases of actual or alleged violations may be expensive and time consuming for our senior management.

Our vessels made three voyages in 2022 and five voyages in 2023 carrying cargoes originating in the Russian ports of St. Petersburg and Ust-Luga and may from time to time in the future carry cargoes originating in Russia, Ukraine or sanctioned countries. It is possible that such cargoes, despite our belief that they are compliant

46

with applicable sanctions, are alleged to have originated from sources that are not in compliance with such sanctions, which could result in penalties against us, including blacklisting of a vessel which would preclude chartering or selling such vessel, and negatively impact our acceptability to potential charterers and harm our business. In addition, it may not be possible for us to obtain war risk or other insurances for any vessel loading cargoes originating in such countries, as has been the case for certain of our vessels’ voyages this year. In such a case, if the vessel was involved in an accident, spill or was otherwise damaged in connection with such a voyage, which could result in losses up to the total loss of the vessel, we would have to bear the repair, clean-up or other costs associated with such an incident, as well as the lack of revenue from any off-hire period, in reliance on our existing cash resources, and we would remain obligated to service and repay our outstanding indebtedness secured by such vessel. In addition, any deemed non-compliance with sanctions could constitute an event of default under any loan agreements secured by such vessel, and our lenders may seek to accelerate for immediate repayment any indebtedness outstanding thereunder. Any such occurrences could adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. In addition, actual or alleged violations could damage our reputation and ability to do business.

Furthermore, if ships managed by Brave Maritime or Stealth Maritime, including those not owned by us, and ships owned by an affiliated entity of Brave Maritime or Stealth Maritime, including StealthGas and Imperial Petroleum, were deemed to have violated sanctions or other laws and regulations, we could face similar consequences, including an inability to charter, insure or sell our ships, access our bank accounts or have our assets frozen, if we, such affiliated entities or our ships are blacklisted by authorities.

Obligations associated with being a public company require significant company resources and management attention.

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and the other rules and regulations of the SEC, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Sarbanes-Oxley. Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley requires that we evaluate and determine the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

We work with our legal, accounting and financial advisors to identify any areas in which changes should be made to our financial and management control systems to manage our growth and our obligations as a public company. We evaluate areas such as corporate governance, corporate control, internal audit, disclosure controls and procedures and financial reporting and accounting systems. We will make changes in any of these and other areas, including our internal control over financial reporting, which we believe are necessary. However, these and other measures we may take may not be sufficient to allow us to satisfy our obligations as a public company on a timely and reliable basis. In addition, compliance with reporting and other requirements applicable to public companies do create additional costs for us and will require the time and attention of management. Our limited management resources may exacerbate the difficulties in complying with these reporting and other requirements while focusing on executing our business strategy. We may not be able to predict or estimate the amount of the additional costs we may incur, the timing of such costs or the degree of impact that our management’s attention to these matters will have on our business.

If management is unable to provide reports as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, investors could lose confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which could result in a decrease in the value of our Common Shares.

Under Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley, we are required to include in each of our annual reports on Form 20-F, beginning with the second such annual report on Form 20-F after the Spin–Off Distribution, a report containing our management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. If, in such annual reports on Form 20-F, our management cannot provide a report as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as required by Section 404, investors could lose confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which could result in a decrease in the value of our Common Shares.

47

Risks Related to Taxation

If we were to be subject to corporate income tax in jurisdictions in which we operate, our financial results would be adversely affected.

We and our subsidiaries may be subject to tax in the jurisdictions in which we are organized or operate, reducing the amount of our net income and cash flows, including cash available for dividend payments. Under current Marshall Islands law, there is no income, corporate or profits tax or withholding tax, capital gains tax or capital transfer tax, estate or inheritance tax payable by us or our stockholders, other than stockholders ordinarily resident in the Republic of the Marshall Islands, if any. We believe that we should not be subject to tax under the laws of various countries, other than the United States, in which our subsidiaries’ vessels conduct activities or in which our subsidiaries’ customers are located. However, our belief is based on our understanding of the tax laws of those countries, and our tax position is subject to review and possible challenge by taxing authorities and to possible changes in law or interpretation. We cannot determine in advance the extent to which certain jurisdictions may require us to pay corporate income tax or to make payments in lieu of such tax. In addition, payments due to us from our subsidiaries’ customers may be subject to tax claims. In computing our tax obligation in these jurisdictions, we may be required to take various tax accounting and reporting positions on matters that are not entirely free from doubt and for which we have not received rulings from the governing authorities. We cannot assure you that upon review of these positions the applicable authorities will agree with our positions. A successful challenge by a tax authority could result in additional tax imposed on us or our subsidiaries, further reducing the cash available for distribution. In addition, changes in our operations or ownership could result in additional tax being imposed on us or our subsidiaries in jurisdictions in which operations are conducted.

In accordance with the currently applicable Greek law, foreign flagged vessels that are managed by Greek or foreign ship management companies having established an office in Greece are subject to duties towards the Greek state which are calculated on the basis of the relevant vessels’ tonnage. The payment of said duties exhausts the tax liability of the foreign ship owning company and the relevant manager against any tax, duty, charge or contribution payable on income from the exploitation of the foreign flagged vessel. As our manager is located in Greece, we will have to pay these duties. Our operations in Greece may be subjected to new regulations that may require us to incur new or additional compliance or other administrative costs, which may include requirements that we pay to the Greek government new taxes or other fees, including changes or increases in the current tonnage tax.

In addition, China has enacted a new tax for non-resident international transportation enterprises engaged in the provision of services of passengers or cargo, among other items, in and out of China using their own, chartered or leased vessels, including any stevedore, warehousing and other services connected with the transportation. The new regulation broadens the range of international transportation companies which may find themselves liable for Chinese enterprise income tax on profits generated from international transportation services passing through Chinese ports.

We may have to pay tax on United States-source income, which would reduce our earnings.

Under the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, 50% of the gross shipping income of vessel owning or chartering corporations, such as our subsidiaries, that is attributable to transportation that begins or ends, but does not both begin and end, in the United States is characterized as United States-source shipping income. United States-source shipping income is subject to either a (i) 4% United States federal income tax without allowance for deductions or (ii) taxation at the standard United States federal income tax rates (and potentially to a 30% branch profits tax), unless derived by a corporation that qualifies for exemption from tax under Section 883 of the Code and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder.

Generally, we and our subsidiaries will qualify for this exemption for a taxable year if our shares are treated as “primarily and regularly traded” on an established securities market in the United States. Our Common Shares

48

will be so treated if (i) the aggregate number of our Common Shares traded during such year on an established securities market in the United States exceeds the aggregate number of our Common Shares traded during that year on established securities markets in any other single country, (ii) either (x) our Common Shares are regularly quoted during such year by dealers making a market in our shares or (y) trades in our Common Shares are effected, other than in de minimis quantities, on an established securities market in the United States on at least 60 days during such taxable year and the aggregate number of our Common Shares traded on an established securities market in the United States during such year equals at least 10% of the average number of our Common Shares outstanding during such taxable year and (iii) our Common Shares are not “closely held” during such taxable year. For these purposes, our Common Shares will be treated as closely held during a taxable year if, for more than one-half the number of days in such taxable year, one or more persons each of whom owns either directly or under applicable attribution rules, at least 5% of our Common Shares, own, in the aggregate, 50% or more of our Common Shares, unless we can establish, in accordance with applicable documentation requirements, that a sufficient number of the Common Shares in the closely-held block are owned, directly or indirectly, by persons that are residents of foreign jurisdictions that provide United States shipping companies with an exemption from tax that is equivalent to that provided by Section 883 to preclude other stockholders in the closely-held block from owning 50% or more of the closely-held block of Common Shares. We or any of our subsidiaries may not qualify for the benefits of Section 883 for any year.

In the future it may be the case that, one or more persons each of whom owns, either directly or under applicable attribution rules, at least 5% of our Common Shares own, in the aggregate, 50% or more of our Common Shares. In such circumstances, we and our subsidiaries may qualify for the exemption provided in Section 883 of the Code only if a sufficient number of shares of the closely-held block of our Common Shares were owned or treated as owned by “qualified shareholders” so it could not be the case that, for more than half of the days in the taxable year, the Common Shares in the closely-held block not owned or treated as owned by qualified shareholders represented 50% or more of our Common Shares. For these purposes, a “qualified shareholder” includes an individual that owns or is treated as owning Common Shares and is a resident of a jurisdiction that provides an exemption that is equivalent to that provided by Section 883 of the Code and certain other persons; provided in each case that such individual or other person complies with certain documentation and certification requirements set forth in the Section 883 regulations and designed to establish status as a qualified shareholder.

If we or our subsidiaries do not qualify for the exemption under Section 883 of the Code for any taxable year, then we or our subsidiaries would be subject for those years to the 4% United States federal income tax on gross United States shipping income or, in certain circumstances, to net income taxation at the standard United States federal income tax rates (and potentially also to a 30% branch profits tax). The imposition of such tax could have a negative effect on our business and would result in decreased earnings and cash flow.

We could become a “passive foreign investment company,” which would have adverse United States federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders and, in turn, us.

A foreign corporation will be treated as a “passive foreign investment company,” or PFIC, for United States federal income tax purposes if either (1) at least 75% of its gross income for any taxable year consists of certain types of “passive income” or (2) at least 50% of the average value of the corporation’s assets produce or are held for the production of those types of “passive income.” For purposes of these tests, “passive income” includes dividends, interest, and gains from the sale or exchange of investment property and rents and royalties other than rents and royalties which are received from unrelated parties in connection with the active conduct of a trade or business. For purposes of these tests, income derived from the performance of services does not constitute “passive income” and working capital and similar assets held pending investment in vessels will generally be treated as an asset which produces passive income. United States stockholders of a PFIC are subject to a disadvantageous United States federal income tax regime with respect to the income derived by the PFIC, the distributions they receive from the PFIC and the gain, if any, they derive from the sale or other disposition of their shares in the PFIC.

49

In connection with determining our PFIC status we treat and intend to continue to treat the gross income that we derive or are deemed to derive from our time chartering and voyage chartering activities as services income, rather than rental income. We believe that our income from time chartering and voyage chartering activities does not constitute “passive income” and that the assets that we own and operate in connection with the production of that income do not constitute assets held for the production of passive income. We treat and intend to continue to treat, for purposes of the PFIC rules, the income that we derive from bareboat charters as passive income and the assets giving rise to such income as assets held for the production of passive income. There is, however, no legal authority specifically under the PFIC rules regarding our current and proposed method of operation and it is possible that the United States Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, may not accept our positions and that a court may uphold such challenge, in which case we and certain of our subsidiaries could be treated as PFICs. In this regard we note that a federal court decision addressing the characterization of time charters concludes that they constitute leases for federal income tax purposes and employs an analysis which, if applied to our time charters, could result in our treatment and the treatment of our vessel-owning subsidiaries as PFICs. In addition, in making the determination as to whether we are a PFIC, we intend to treat the deposits that we make on our newbuilding contracts and that are with respect to vessels we do not expect to bareboat charter as assets which are not held for the production of passive income for purposes of determining whether we are a PFIC. We note that there is no direct authority on this point and it is possible that the IRS may disagree with our position.

On the basis of the foregoing assumptions, we do not believe that we were a PFIC for our 2022 taxable year, and we do not expect to be a PFIC for 2023 or the current taxable year. This belief is based in part upon our beliefs regarding the value of the assets that we hold for the production of or in connection with the production of passive income relative to the value of our other assets. Should these beliefs turn out to be incorrect, then we and certain of our subsidiaries could be treated as PFICs for 2022 or 2023. There can be no assurance that the IRS or a court will not determine values for our assets that would cause us to be treated as a PFIC for 2022, 2023, or a subsequent year.

In addition, although we do not believe that we were a PFIC for 2022, and we do not expect to be a PFIC for 2023, we may choose to operate our business in the current or in future taxable years in a manner that could cause us to become a PFIC for those years. Because our status as a PFIC for any taxable year will not be determinable until after the end of the taxable year, and depends upon our assets, income and operations in that taxable year, there can be no assurance that we will not be considered a PFIC for 2022, 2023, or any future taxable year.

If the IRS were to find that we are or have been a PFIC for any taxable year, our United States stockholders would face adverse United States tax consequences. Under the PFIC rules, unless those stockholders make an election available under the Code (which election could itself have adverse consequences for such stockholders, as discussed below under “Tax Considerations—United States Federal Income Taxation of U.S. Holders”), such stockholders would be liable to pay United States federal income tax at the then prevailing income tax rates on ordinary income plus interest upon excess distributions and upon any gain from the disposition of our Common Shares, as if the excess distribution or gain had been recognized ratably over the stockholder’s holding period of our Common Shares. Similar rules would apply to holders of our Class C Warrants or pre-funded warrants. See “Tax Considerations—United States Federal Income Tax Consequences—United States Federal Income Taxation of U.S. Holders” for a more comprehensive discussion of the United States federal income tax consequences to United States stockholders if we are treated as a PFIC. As a result of these adverse tax consequences to United States stockholders, such a finding by the IRS may result in sales of our Common Shares by United States stockholders, which could lower the price of our Common Shares and adversely affect our ability to raise capital.

The United States federal income taxation of the pre-funded warrants is uncertain.

We and holders of our pre-funded warrants may have to take positions that are not yet settled under current U.S. federal income tax law with respect to the pre-funded warrants. In particular, the precise application of the

50

Code section 883 exemption and the PFIC rules to the pre-funded warrants is unclear. The IRS may disagree with the positions taken by the Company, which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences for us and our stockholders, including holders of the pre-funded warrants. Prospective investors are urged to consult their personal income tax advisers in this regard.

Risk Related to an Investment in a Marshall Islands Corporation

As a foreign private issuer we are entitled to claim exemptions from certain Nasdaq corporate governance standards, and to the extent we rely on these exemptions, you may not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the Nasdaq corporate governance requirements.

As a foreign private issuer, we are entitled to claim an exemption from many of Nasdaq’s corporate governance practices. Currently, our corporate governance practices comply with the Nasdaq corporate governance standards applicable to U.S. listed companies other than that we only have two members on our audit committee whereas a domestic U.S. company would be required to have three members on its audit committee and a board of directors composed of two independent and two non-independent directors, whereas a domestic U.S. public company would be required to have a majority of independent members. In lieu of obtaining shareholder approval prior to the issuance of certain designated securities issuances, the Company will comply with provisions of the Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act providing that the Board of Directors approves share issuances. To the extent we rely on these or other exemptions you may not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the Nasdaq corporate governance requirements.

We are incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands, which does not have a well-developed body of corporate law or a bankruptcy act.

Our corporate affairs are governed by our articles of incorporation and bylaws and by the Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act, or BCA. The provisions of the BCA resemble provisions of the corporation laws of a number of states in the United States. However, there have been few judicial cases in the Republic of the Marshall Islands interpreting the BCA. The rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under the law of the Republic of the Marshall Islands are not as clearly established as the rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under statutes or judicial precedent in existence in certain U.S. jurisdictions. Stockholder rights may differ as well. While the BCA does specifically incorporate the non-statutory law, or judicial case law, of the State of Delaware and other states with substantially similar legislative provisions, our public stockholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions by the management, directors or controlling stockholders than would stockholders of a corporation incorporated in a U.S. jurisdiction. The Marshall Islands has no established bankruptcy act, and as a result, any bankruptcy action involving our company would have to be initiated outside the Marshall Islands, and our public stockholders may find it difficult or impossible to pursue their claims in such other jurisdictions.

It may be difficult to enforce service of process and judgments against us and our officers and directors.

We are a Marshall Islands company, and our executive offices are located outside of the United States. All of our directors and officers reside outside of the United States, and most of our assets and their assets are located outside the United States. As a result, you may have difficulty serving legal process within the United States upon us or any of these persons. You may also have difficulty enforcing, both in and outside the United States, judgments you may obtain in the U.S. courts against us or these persons in any action, including actions based upon the civil liability provisions of U.S. federal or state securities laws. There is also substantial doubt that the courts of the Marshall Islands would enter judgments in original actions brought in those courts predicated on U.S., federal or state securities laws.

51

Risks Relating To Our Common Shares

Prior to the Spin Off, our Common Shares were never publicly traded. An active trading market that will provide you with adequate liquidity for our Common Shares may be limited.

There is a limited public market for our Common Shares and there is a limited liquid trading market for our Common Shares on Nasdaq. We cannot predict the extent to which investor interest will lead to the development of an active and liquid trading market on Nasdaq for our Common Shares or, if such market develops, whether it will be maintained. The lack of an active trading market on Nasdaq and low trading volume for our Common Shares, may make it more difficult for you to sell our Common Shares and could lead to our share price becoming depressed or volatile.

There can be no assurance that an active trading market for our Common Shares on either Nasdaq or any other exchange will develop. If an active and liquid trading market does not develop, relatively small sales of our Common Shares could have a significant negative impact on the price of our Common Shares.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or publish negative reports about our business, our share price and trading volume could decline.

There is currently no analyst coverage of the Company. The trading market for our Common Shares will depend, in part, upon the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. We do not have any control over analysts as to whether they will cover us, and if they do, whether such coverage will continue. If analysts do not commence coverage of the Company, or if one or more of these analysts cease coverage of the Company or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our share price or trading volume to decline. In addition, if one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our shares or change their opinion of our shares, our share price may likely decline.

You may experience future dilution as a result of future equity offerings, which we expect to be a significant component of the financing for the planned expansion of our fleet, and other issuances of our Common Shares, preferred shares or other securities, including Common Shares issued upon conversion of our Series A Convertible Preferred Shares and exercise of our outstanding warrants.

In order to raise additional capital, including to fund the remaining purchase price obligation for our recently-acquired Aframax tanker and support our further growth plans, or in connection with equity awards, strategic transactions or otherwise, we may in the future offer additional Common Shares, preferred shares, or other securities convertible into or exchangeable for our Common Shares, including convertible debt. We expect that a significant component of the financing for the planned expansion of our fleet will be through equity offerings. We cannot predict the size of future issuances or sales of our Common Shares, preferred shares or other securities, including those made in connection with future acquisitions or capital raising activities, or the effect that such issuances or sales may have on the market price of our Common Shares. The issuance and sale of substantial amounts of Common Shares, preferred shares or other equity-linked securities, or announcement that such issuance and sales may occur, could adversely affect the market price of our Common Shares.

As a result of the Spin-Off, Imperial Petroleum owns 93,750,000 Series A Convertible Preferred Shares, with an aggregate liquidation preference of $15,000,000, that currently are convertible into our Common Shares at a conversion price of $0.16. The conversion price of the Series A Convertible Preferred Shares will be adjusted to the lowest price of issuance of Common Shares by the Company in any registered offering of Common Shares after the original issuance of Series A Convertible Preferred Shares, including this offering. As a result, we may issue a significantly larger number of Common Shares upon conversion of the Series A Convertible Preferred Shares. The issuance of such Common Shares upon conversion of the Series A Convertible Preferred Shares could result in substantial dilution to investors in our Common Shares if the conversion price at the time of

52

conversion of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock is lower than the price per share of Common Shares paid by investor. We also have Class A Warrants outstanding that are excisable for 4,765,000 of our Common Shares at an exercise price of $1.05 per share, Class B-1 Warrants outstanding that are currently exercisable for 8,780,000 of our Common Shares at an exercise price of $0.375 per share or pursuant to an alternative cashless exercise option for no consideration and Class B-2 Warrants outstanding that are currently exercisable for 32,200,000 of our Common Shares at an exercise price of $0.425 per share.

The exercise price of our outstanding Class B-1 and Class B-2 Warrants will be adjusted in certain circumstances. If (1) there occurs any share split, share dividend, share combination recapitalization or other similar transaction involving our Common Shares and the lowest daily volume weighted average price during the period commencing five consecutive trading days immediately preceding and the five consecutive trading days immediately following such event is less than the exercise price then in effect, then the exercise price shall be reduced to the lowest daily volume weighted average price during such five day period and the number of Common Shares issuable upon exercise will be proportionately adjusted such that the aggregate exercise price the Class B-1 Warrants and Class B-2 Warrants will remain unchanged, and (2) we sell, enter into an agreement to sell, or grant any option to purchase, or sell, enter into an agreement to sell, or grant any right to reprice, or otherwise dispose of or issue (or announce any offer, sale, grant or any option to purchase or other disposition) any Common Shares or convertible security, at an effective price per share less than the exercise price of the Class B-2 Warrant then in effect, the exercise price of the Class B-1 Warrants and Class B-2 Warrants will be reduced to such price, provide that, the exercise price will not be less than $0.10, and the number of Common Shares issuable upon exercise of the Class B-2 Warrants will be proportionately adjusted such that the aggregate exercise price will remain unchanged. As a result, we may issue a significantly larger number of Common Shares upon exercise of the Class B-1 Warrants and Class B-2 Warrants.

In addition, sales of a substantial number of shares of our outstanding Common Shares in the public market could occur at any time. These sales, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of Common Shares intend to sell shares, could reduce the market price of our Common Shares.

It is likely that we will need to seek to effect a reverse stock split of our common shares in order to attempt to comply with the Nasdaq Minimum Bid Price Requirement (as defined in Risk Factors-“We may fail to meet the Nasdaq continuous listing criteria and Nasdaq may delist our Common Shares from its exchange, which could limit your ability to make transactions in our securities and subject us to additional trading restrictions.” and/or due to the closing bid price of our Common Shares being at or below $0.10 for ten consecutive trading days, which could occur in the near term. Our stockholders previously approved an amendment of our amended and restated articles of incorporation giving our Board of Directors authority, in its discretion, to effect one or more reverse stock splits of the shares of our common stock issued and outstanding at the time of the reverse split at an exchange ratio of between one-for-two and one-for-five hundred prior to the third anniversary of the June 2023 spin-out of our Company. See “Description of Capital Stock—Authorized Capital—Common Stock.” Any reverse stock split that is effected is likely to result in a decrease in the exercise price and an increase in the number of Common Shares issuable upon exercise of our outstanding Class B-1 Warrants and Class B-2 Warrants. The conversion price of our Series A Convertible Preferred Shares would also adjust in the event of certain adjustments to the consideration per Common Share payable upon exercise of our outstanding warrants.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to make future sales of our Common Shares, preferred shares or other securities in any other offering at a price per share that is equal to or greater than the price per share paid by investors, and investors purchasing shares or other securities in the future could have rights that are superior to existing shareholders. The issuance of additional Common Shares, preferred shares or other securities, including upon conversion of our Series A Convertible Preferred Shares or exercise of our outstanding warrants, could adversely impact the trading price of our Common Shares.

The market price of our Common Shares may be subject to significant fluctuations.

The market price of our Common Shares may be subject to significant fluctuations as a result of many factors, some of which are beyond our control. Among the factors that could affect our stock price are:

53

The international drybulk and tanker shipping industry has been highly unpredictable. In addition, the stock markets in general, and the markets for drybulk and tanker shipping and shipping stocks in general, have experienced extreme volatility that has sometimes been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our Common Shares.

We may fail to meet the Nasdaq continuous listing criteria and Nasdaq may delist our Common Shares from its exchange, which could limit your ability to make transactions in our securities and subject us to additional trading restrictions.

We received written notification from Nasdaq, dated August 24, 2023, indicating that because the closing bid price of our Common Shares for 30 consecutive business days, from July 13, 2023 through August 23, 2023, was below the minimum $1.00 per share bid price requirement for continued listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market, the Company was not in compliance with the minimum bid price requirement of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) (the “Nasdaq Minimum Price Requirement”). Pursuant to the Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), the applicable grace period to regain compliance is 180 days, or February 22, 2024. On February 21, 2024, we received a letter from Nasdaq notifying us that we have been granted an additional 180 days, or until August 19, 2024, to regain compliance with the Nasdaq Minimum Price Requirement. We have notified Nasdaq that it is our intention to cure the deficiency during this additional 180-day period by effecting a reverse stock split, if necessary. In order to regain compliance, our Common Shares would need to maintain a minimum closing bid price of at least $1.00 per share for a minimum of 10 consecutive trading days prior to August 19, 2024. On March 14, 2024, the closing price of our Common Shares reported on the Nasdaq Capital Market was $0.079.

We may still be unable to meet the minimum bid price requirement within the additional 180-day period, we may be unable to complete a reverse stock split, if necessary, and we may be unable to meet other applicable Nasdaq listing requirements, including maintaining minimum levels of stockholders’ equity or market values of our Common Shares, in which case our Common Shares could be delisted. If during any compliance period, our Common Shares have a closing bid price of $0.10 or less for ten consecutive trading days as occurred on March 14, 2024, Nasdaq will issue a Staff Delisting Determination under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810 with respect to our Common Shares. If our Common Shares were to be delisted, the liquidity of our Common Shares would be adversely affected, and the market price of our Common Shares could decrease. In addition, the delisting of our

54

Common Shares from a national exchange would have a material adverse effect on our access to capital markets, and any limitation on market liquidity or reduction in the price of our Common Shares as a result of that delisting could materially adversely affect the Company’s ability to raise capital on terms acceptable to the Company, or at all.

It is likely that we will need to seek to effect a reverse stock split of our common shares in order to attempt to comply with the Nasdaq minimum bid price requirement and/or due to the closing bid price of our Common Shares being at or below $0.10 for ten consecutive trading days, which could occur in the near term. Any reverse stock split that is effected is likely to result in a decrease in the exercise price and an increase in the number of Common Shares issuable upon exercise of our outstanding Class B-1 Warrants and Class B-2 Warrants. The conversion price of our Series A Convertible Preferred Shares would also adjust in the event of certain adjustments to the consideration per Common Share payable upon exercise of our outstanding warrants.

If we are unable to regain compliance, our Common Shares may be suspended or delisted at the discretion of Nasdaq. If a suspension or delisting of our Common Shares were to occur, there would be significantly less liquidity in the suspended or delisted Common Shares. In addition, our ability to raise additional capital through equity or debt financing would be greatly impaired. There can be no assurance that we will regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement and, if we regain compliance, there can be no assurance that we will maintain compliance in the future.

Our amended and restated articles of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain anti-takeover provisions that may discourage, delay or prevent (1) our merger or acquisition and/or (2) the removal of incumbent directors and officers and (3) the ability of public shareholders to benefit from a change in control.

Our amended and restated articles of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain certain anti-takeover provisions. These provisions include blank check preferred stock, the prohibition of cumulative voting in the election of directors, a classified Board of Directors, advance written notice for shareholder nominations for directors, removal of directors only for cause, advance written notice of shareholder proposals for the removal of directors and limitations on action by shareholders. These anti-takeover provisions, either individually or in the aggregate, may discourage, delay or prevent (1) our merger or acquisition by means of a tender offer, a proxy contest or otherwise, that a shareholder may consider in its best interest, (2) the removal of incumbent directors and officers, and (3) the ability of public shareholders to benefit from a change in control. These anti-takeover provisions could substantially impede the ability of shareholders to benefit from a change in control and, as a result, may adversely affect the market price of our Common Shares and shareholders’ ability to realize any potential change of control premium.

We are an emerging growth company and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our Common Shares less attractive to investors.

We are an emerging growth company, as defined in the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. We cannot predict if investors will find our Common Shares less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our Common Shares less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our Common Shares and our share price may be more volatile.

In addition, under the JOBS Act, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for so long as we are an emerging growth company.

For as long as we take advantage of the reduced reporting obligations, the information that we provide our shareholders may be different from information provided by other public companies.

55

Imperial Petroleum will be able to exert considerable control over matters on which our shareholders are entitled to vote.

In connection with the contribution of the vessels comprising our initial fleet to us by Imperial Petroleum and $5,000,000 in working capital in connection with our Spin-Off, we issued 600,000 Series A Convertible Preferred Shares to Imperial Petroleum. These Series A Convertible Preferred Shares vote with our Common Shares and each Series A Preferred Share entitles the holder thereof to the right to cast a number of votes for all matters on which our shareholders are entitled to vote equal to the number of Common Shares into which such shares are convertible multiplied by 30, subject to certain limitations that will prevent the Imperial Petroleum from exercising more than 49.99% of the aggregate voting power derived from any voting security then held by Imperial Petroleum on any matter put to shareholders. While the Imperial Petroleum has no agreement, arrangement or understanding relating to the voting of the Series A Convertible Preferred Shares, it is able to influence the outcome of matters on which our shareholders are entitled to vote, including the election of directors and other significant corporate actions. This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control, merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination. This concentration of ownership could also discourage a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us, which could in turn have an adverse effect on the market price of our shares. So long as Imperial Petroleum continues to own a significant amount of our equity, even though the amount is less than 50% of our voting power, it will continue to be able to exercise considerable influence over our decisions. The interests of Imperial Petroleum may be different from your interests.

Our Common Shares rank junior to the Series A Convertible Preferred Shares with respect to dividends and amounts payable in the event of our liquidation.

Our Common Shares rank junior to our Series A Convertible Preferred Shares with respect to the payment of dividends and amounts payable in the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding-up. This means that, unless accumulated dividends have been paid or set aside for payment on all of our outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred Shares for all past completed dividend periods, no dividends may be declared or paid on our Common Shares subject to limited exceptions. Likewise, in the event of our voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, no distribution of our assets may be made to holders of our Common Shares until we have paid to holders of our Series A Convertible Preferred Shares a liquidation preference equal to $25.00 per share plus accumulated and unpaid dividends. Accordingly, the Series A Convertible Preferred Shares may adversely affect the market price of the Common Shares. In addition, the Series A Convertible Preferred Shares are convertible into our Common Shares, at a conversion price equal to $0.16, which will be further adjusted to the lowest price per share sold in a registered public offering, including this offering.

Risk Factors Relating To The Spin-Off

Our historical financial information may not be representative of the results we would have achieved as a stand-alone public company and may not be a reliable indicator of our future results.

The historical financial information that we have included in this prospectus may not necessarily reflect what our financial position, results of operations or cash flows would have been had we been an independent entity during the periods presented or those that we will achieve in the future. The costs and expenses reflected in our historical financial information include an allocation for certain corporate functions historically provided by Imperial Petroleum, that may be different from the comparable expenses that we would have incurred had we operated as a stand-alone company. Our historical financial information does not reflect changes that will occur in our cost structure, financing and operations as a result of our transition to becoming a stand-alone public company, including potential increased costs associated with reduced economies of scale and increased costs associated with SEC reporting and Nasdaq requirements.

We have made allocations based upon available information and assumptions that we believe are reasonable to reflect these factors, among others, in our historical combined financial data. However, our assumptions may

56

prove not to be accurate, and accordingly, the historical combined financial data presented in this prospectus forms a part should not be assumed to be indicative of what our financial condition or results of operations actually would have been as an independent publicly traded company nor to be a reliable indicator of what our financial condition or results of operations actually may be in the future.

We may have difficulty operating as an independent, publicly traded company.

We may not be able to achieve some or all of the benefits that we believe we can achieve as an independent company in the time we expect, if at all. Because our business has previously operated as part of the wider Imperial Petroleum organization, we may not be able to successfully implement the changes necessary to operate independently and may incur additional costs that could adversely affect our business.

As an independent, publicly traded company, we may not enjoy the same benefits that we did as part of Imperial Petroleum.

There is a risk that, by separating from Imperial Petroleum, we may become more susceptible to market fluctuations and other adverse events than we would have been if we were still a part of the current Imperial Petroleum organizational structure. As part of Imperial Petroleum, we were able to enjoy certain benefits from Imperial Petroleum’s operating diversity, available capital for investments and opportunities to pursue integrated strategies with Imperial Petroleum’s other businesses. As an independent, publicly traded company, we will not have similar available capital or integration opportunities and may not have similar access to capital markets.

Our ability to meet our capital needs may be harmed by the loss of financial support from Imperial Petroleum.

The loss of financial support from Imperial Petroleum could harm our ability to meet our capital needs. Since the Spin-Off, we expect to obtain any funds needed in excess of the amounts generated by our operating activities through the capital markets or bank financing, and not from Imperial Petroleum. However, given the smaller relative size of our company as compared to Imperial Petroleum after the spin-off, we may incur higher debt servicing and other costs than we would have otherwise incurred as a part of Imperial Petroleum. Further, we cannot guarantee you that we will be able to obtain capital market financing or credit on favorable terms, or at all, in the future. We cannot assure you that our ability to meet our capital needs will not be harmed by the loss of financial support from Imperial Petroleum.

We may not have the surplus or net profits required by law to pay dividends.

We have not declared any dividends on our Common Shares and we may not make dividend payments in the future as we may not earn sufficient revenues or we may incur expenses or liabilities that would reduce or eliminate the cash available for distribution as dividends. As of the date of this prospectus, we did not have any outstanding debt or loan agreements, however, any future loan agreement either for the financing of existing vessels in our fleet or any vessel acquisitions may limit the amount of dividends we can pay under some circumstances.

The declaration and payment of any dividends on our Common Shares or Series A Convertible Preferred Shares will be subject at all times to the discretion of our Board of Directors. The timing and amount of dividends will depend on our earnings, financial condition, cash requirements and availability, restrictions in our loan agreements, growth strategy, charter rates in the drybulk and tanker shipping industry, the provisions of Marshall Islands law affecting the payment of dividends and other factors. Marshall Islands law generally prohibits the payment of dividends other than from surplus (retained earnings and the excess of consideration received for the sale of shares above the par value of the shares), but, if there is no surplus, dividends may be declared out of the net profits (basically, the excess of our revenue over our expenses) for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared or the preceding fiscal year. Marshall Islands law also prohibits the payment of dividends while a company is insolvent or if it would be rendered insolvent upon the payment of a dividend. We may not have the required surplus or net profits to pay dividends, or our Board of Directors may determine to not declare any dividends for the foreseeable future.

57

Our ability to seek a claim against Imperial Petroleum for potential liabilities relating to the operation of the vessels comprising our fleet prior to our separation from Imperial Petroleum and the Spin-Off may be limited.

In connection with the contribution to us by Imperial Petroleum of the subsidiaries that own the vessels comprising our fleet, we agreed to acquire the vessels in “as is”, “where is” condition and Imperial Petroleum will not be obligated to indemnify us for any claims made against us that arise out of or relate to the operation of the vessels comprising our fleet prior to the Spin-Off. Although we may be able to seek recourse against Imperial Petroleum in connection with claims relating to operation of the vessels comprising our fleet prior to our separation from Imperial Petroleum and the Spin-Off, there can be no assurance that such efforts would be successful. Any liabilities relating to such claims may be significant and could negatively impact our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions – Contribution and Distribution Agreement.”

Certain of our directors and executive officers are director and/or executive officers of Imperial Petroleum and own shares of Imperial Petroleum common stock, which could cause conflicts of interests.

The interests of our President and Chief Executive Officer, Non-Executive Chairman and other directors and officers in Imperial Petroleum common stock and the presence of certain of Imperial Petroleum’s executives and directors on our board of directors could create, or appear to create, conflicts of interest with respect to matters involving both us and Imperial Petroleum that could have different implications for Imperial Petroleum than they do for us. As a result, we may be precluded from pursuing certain opportunities on which we would otherwise act, including growth opportunities.

We do not intend to adopt specific policies or procedures to address conflicts of interests that may arise as a result of certain of our directors and officers owning Imperial Petroleum common stock or our directors being an executive officer and/or director of Imperial Petroleum. We have, however, adopted a Related Person Transactions Policy to provide guidance in identifying, reviewing and, where appropriate, approving or ratifying transactions with related persons.

Risks Relating to this Offering

We have broad discretion in the use of the net proceeds from this offering and may use the net proceeds in ways with which you disagree.

Our management will have broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds from this offering and could spend the proceeds in ways that do not improve our results of operations or enhance the value of our securities. You will be relying on the judgment of our management with regard to the use of these net proceeds, and you will not have the opportunity, as part of your investment decision, to assess whether the net proceeds are being used appropriately. The failure by our management to apply these funds effectively could result in financial losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and cash flows, and cause the price of our securities to decline. Pending the application of these funds, we may invest the net proceeds from this offering in a manner that does not produce income or that loses value.

The Class C Warrants are speculative in nature.

The Class C Warrants will be exercisable for five years from the date of initial issuance at an initial exercise price equal to 150% and 170%, respectively, of the public offering price per Unit. There can be no assurance that the market price of the Common Shares will ever equal or exceed the exercise price of the Class C Warrants. Although the exercise price of the Class C Warrants will adjust upon the occurrence of certain events in accordance with the terms of the Class C Warrants, there are limits to these adjustments in certain circumstances, including that the exercise price shall not be adjusted below $0.10 per share in connection with a dilutive issuance of Common Shares and/or securities convertible or exchangeable for Common Shares. In the event that the price of our Common Shares does not exceed the exercise price of the Class C Warrants during the period when the Class C Warrants are exercisable, a holder of Class C Warrants may be unable to profit from exercising such Class C Warrants before they expire.

58

Except as otherwise provided in the Class C Warrants and pre-funded warrants, holders of Class C Warrants and pre-funded warrants purchased in this offering will have no rights as stockholders until such holders exercise their Class C Warrants or pre-funded warrants and acquire our Common Shares.

Except as otherwise provided in the Class C Warrants and pre-funded warrants, until holders of Class C Warrants or pre-funded warrants acquire our Common Shares upon exercise of the Class C Warrants or pre-funded Warrants, holders of Class C Warrants and pre-funded warrants will have no rights with respect to our Common Shares underlying such Class C Warrants and pre-funded warrants. Upon exercise of the Class C Warrants and pre-funded Warrants, the holders will be entitled to exercise the rights of a holder of our Common Shares only as to matters for which the record date occurs after the exercise date.

There is no public market for the Class C Warrants or pre-funded warrants being offered in this offering and we do not expect one to develop.

There is presently no established public trading market for the Class C Warrants or pre-funded warrants being offered in this offering and we do not expect a market to develop. In addition, we do not intend to apply to list the Class C Warrants or pre-funded warrants on any securities exchange or nationally recognized trading system, including the Nasdaq. Without an active market, the liquidity of the Class C Warrants and pre-funded warrants will be limited.

Holders may be subject to tax if we make or fail to make certain adjustments to the exercise price of the Class C Warrants even though holders do not receive a corresponding cash distribution.

The exercise price of the Class C Warrants is subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. See “Description of Securities We Are Offering—Class C Warrants.” If, as a result of an adjustment, a holder’s interest in our assets or earnings and profits is increased, such holder may be deemed to have received for U.S. federal income tax purposes a taxable dividend without the receipt of any cash or property. In addition, a failure to adjust (or to adjust adequately) the exercise price after an event that increases a holder’s proportionate interest in the Company could be treated as a deemed taxable dividend to such holder. For a Non-U.S. Holder (as defined in “Tax Considerations—U.S. Federal Income Taxation of ‘Non-U.S. Holders”’), any deemed dividend generally will be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax (currently at a 30% rate, or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable treaty), which may be withheld from subsequent payments on any Common Shares received upon the exercise of the Class C Warrants. Holders should consult their tax advisers regarding the proper U.S. federal income tax treatment of any adjustments to (or failure to adjust, or adjust adequately) the exercise price of the Class C Warrants. See “Tax Considerations—U.S. Federal Income Taxation of Our Company” for a further discussion of U.S. federal income tax implications for investors.

59

USE OF PROCEEDS

We estimate that we will receive net proceeds of approximately $5.1 million from this offering (or $5.9 million, if the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional securities in full), after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and expenses payable by us related to this offering, assuming full exercise for cash of any pre-funded warrants sold in this offering and assuming no exercise of the Class C Warrants sold in this offering.

We intend to use the net proceeds of this offering for capital expenditures, including for payment towards the $38.7 million remaining purchase price for the Aframax tanker we acquired in July 2023, or acquisitions of additional vessels which we have not yet identified, which may include vessels in seaborne transportation sectors other than the drybulk and tanker sectors in which we currently operate, working capital and for other general corporate purposes, or a combination thereof.

These expected uses represent our intentions based upon our current plans and business conditions, which could change in the future as our plans and business conditions evolve. The amounts and timing of our actual expenditures may vary significantly depending on numerous factors. As a result, our management will have broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds from this offering, and investors will be relying on the judgment of our management regarding the application of the net proceeds from this offering. The timing and amount of our actual expenditures will be based on many factors, including cash flows from operations and the anticipated growth of our business.

60

CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth our consolidated capitalization at September 30, 2023:

Other than these adjustments, there have been no other material changes to our capitalization from debt or equity issuances, re-capitalizations, special dividends, or debt repayments as adjusted in the table below between October 1, 2023 and the date of this prospectus.

Please read “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere herein.

61

62

DIVIDEND POLICY

We currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business. Our board of directors will, however, evaluate our dividend policy consistent with our cash flows and liquidity requirements and we may consider paying dividends on our Common Shares depending on future performance of our business and financial condition. Declaration and payment of any future dividend is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors. The timing and amount of dividend payments will be dependent upon our earnings, financial condition, cash requirements and availability, restrictions in our loan agreements, or other financing arrangements, the provisions of Marshall Islands law affecting the payment of distributions to stockholders and other factors, and will be subject to the priority of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, which, as described elsewhere in this prospectus, earn dividends at a dividend rate of 5.00% per annum per $25.00 of liquidation preference per share. Because we are a holding company with no material assets other than the stock of our subsidiaries, our ability to pay dividends will depend on the earnings and cash flow of our subsidiaries and their ability to pay dividends to us. Marshall Islands law generally prohibits the payment of dividends other than from surplus or while a company is insolvent or would be rendered insolvent upon the payment thereof.

63

DILUTION

Dilution or accretion is the amount by which the offering price paid by the purchasers of our Units in this offering exceeds or is lower than, respectively, the net tangible book value per Common Share after the offering. Net tangible book value per Common Share represents our total tangible assets less total liabilities divided by the number of Common Shares outstanding.

Our net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2023 was $6.32. Our pro forma net tangible book value as of September 30, 2023 after giving effect to the issuance of 794,768 restricted shares in November 2023, a total of 36,055,159 Common Shares comprising the issuance and sale of 27,940,391 Common Shares, including 21,280,391 upon exercise of 21,340,000 pre-funded warrants, 16,100,000 Class B-1 Warrants and 32,200,000 Class B-2 Warrants, for aggregate net proceeds of $6.1 million, in a registered public offering consummated in January 2024 and the issuance of 7,320,000 Common Shares upon the exercise of 7,320,000 such Class B-1 Warrants pursuant to alternative cashless exercise options as well as the dividends relating to our Series A Convertible Preferred Shares amounting to $0.2 million, was $56.18 million in total and $1.28 per Common Share.

Dilution to Existing Shareholders and Accretion to New Investors

As adjusted to give effect to the sale by us of 120,000,000 Units, each consisting of one of our Common Shares or one pre-funded warrant, one-half of one Class C-1 Warrant and one Class C-2 Warrant, offered by this prospectus, and after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, our adjusted pro forma net tangible book value as of September 30, 2023 would have been $61.29 million, or $0.37 per Common Share. This represents an immediate decrease in net tangible book value of approximately $0.91 per share to existing stockholders and an immediate accretion of approximately $0.32 per share to new investors purchasing our Common Shares in this offering.

The following table illustrates this calculation on a per share basis:

The number of Common Shares to be outstanding after this offering of 164,002,840 is based on the 120,000,000 Common Shares issued in this offering and the 7,947,681 Common Shares outstanding on September 30, 2023, as adjusted for the issuance of 794,768 restricted shares in November 2023 and the issuance and sale of 27,940,391 Common Shares, including 21,280,391 upon exercise of 21,340,000 pre-funded warrants, 16,100,000 Class B-1 Warrants and 32,200,000 Class B-2 Warrants, in a registered public offering consummated in January 2024 and the issuance of 7,320,000 Common Shares upon the exercise of 7,320,000 such Class B-1 Warrants pursuant to alternative cashless exercise options, and assumes (1) no exercise of the Class C Warrants issued in this offering, (2) no exercise of our outstanding Class A Warrants, Class B-1 Warrants and Class B-2 Warrants and (3) no conversion of our outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred Shares. See “Description of Capital Stock— Series A Convertible Preferred Stock,—Class B-1 Warrants and—Class B-2 Warrants.” It also assumes no sale of pre-funded warrants in this offering, which, if sold, would reduce the number of Common Shares that we are offering on a one-for-one basis.

The tables and discussion above are based on 44,002,840 Common Shares outstanding as of March 1, 2024 and excludes as of such date:

64

65

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

The following presentation of management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with (1) the combined financial statements of C3is Inc. Predecessor, and (2) the consolidated financial statements of C3is Inc. accompanying notes thereto and other financial information, appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. C3is Inc. was incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands on July 25, 2022. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, such as those set forth in the section entitled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus. You should also carefully read the following discussion with “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements.” The (1) combined financial statements of C3is Inc. Predecessor, and (2) consolidated financial statements of C3is Inc. have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Throughout this prospectus, all references to “we,” “our,” “us” and the “Company” refer to C3is Inc. and its subsidiaries. We use the term deadweight ton, or dwt, in describing the size of vessels. Dwt, expressed in metric tons, each of which is equivalent to 1,000 kilograms, refers to the maximum weight of cargo and supplies that a vessel can carry. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to “dollars” and “$” in this report are to, and amounts are presented in, U.S. dollars.

Overview

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands on July 25, 2022 to serve as the holding company of two subsidiaries, each owning one of the drybulk carriers in our initial fleet, that Imperial Petroleum subsequently contributed to us in connection with the Spin-Off (as defined below), together with $5,000,000 in cash for working capital in return for our Common Shares and Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. On June 21, 2023, Imperial Petroleum distributed all of our outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Shares”), to its stockholders and warrantholders, which completed our separation from Imperial Petroleum (the “Spin Off” or the “Spin-Off”). Upon the completion of the Spin-Off on June 21, 2023, we began operating as a separate company from Imperial Petroleum, the Nasdaq- listed ship-owning company serving the petroleum products, crude oil and drybulk sectors of the international shipping industry, of which we were previously a part. In July 2023, we acquired an Aframax tanker for $43 million, of which we have paid $4.3 million, with the remainder payable by July 14, 2024.

The financial statements presented in this prospectus relate to the historical operations of the assets that were contributed to us and that comprise our business after the Spin-Off. The historical financial statements included in this prospectus include:

66

We are a provider of international seaborne transportation services to drybulk charterers, including major national and private industrial users, commodity producers and traders, and oil producers, refineries and commodities traders and producers. As of the date of this prospectus, we own and operate a fleet of two drybulk carriers that transport major bulks such as iron ore, coal and grains, and minor bulks such as bauxite, phosphate and fertilizers, and one Aframax crude oil tanker that transports crude oil. The total cargo carrying capacity of our fleet is 179,804 dwt.

We will actively manage the deployment of our fleet placing emphasis on employing our drybulk carriers on time charter trips or spot voyages of short term duration and our tanker vessel mostly on the spot market. Some of our vessels may participate in shipping pools, or, in some cases in contracts of affreightment. As of March 1, 2024, our dry bulk carriers were under time charter contracts expiring in April 2024, and our tanker was operating in the spot market.

Vessels operating on period charters, principally time and bareboat charters, provide more predictable cash flows but can yield lower profit margins than vessels operating in the spot market during periods characterized by favorable market conditions. Vessels operating in the spot market generate revenues that are less predictable but may enable us to achieve increased profit margins during periods of high rates in the charter market, although we are exposed to the risk of having to seek to employ our vessels at low prevailing rates in weak market conditions, which may have a materially adverse impact on our overall financial performance. Vessels operating in pools benefit from better scheduling, and thus increased utilization, and better access to contracts of affreightment due to the larger commercial operation of the pool. We carefully evaluate the length and the rate of the time or bareboat charter contract at the time of fixing or renewing a contract considering market conditions, trends and expectations.

Compared to operating in the spot market both time and bareboat period charters offer (1) higher utilization rates, particularly in weaker markets, (2) lower costs, particularly for bareboat charters under which we are not responsible for voyage or operating expenses, while under time charters we are responsible for operating expenses and in the spot market we are responsible for both voyage and operating expenses, and (3) may generate higher or lower revenues and profit margins depending on market conditions in the drybulk carrier and tanker charter markets, as applicable, with generally higher rates than spot charters in weak markets and lower rates than spot charters in stronger markets, and at what point in the charter market cycle the bareboat or time charters were entered into. The proportion of time our fleet operates on bareboat charters, if any, versus time charters would affect our revenues and expenses, as vessels employed on bareboat charters generate lower revenues and expenses, because under bareboat charters we are not responsible for either voyage expenses or, unlike time charters, operating expenses, and the charter rates for bareboat charters are correspondingly lower. Profit margins for vessels employed on bareboat charters are generally somewhat lower than time charters, reflecting the lack of exposure to operational risk and the risk of operating expense increases. See “—Basis of Presentation and General Information—Revenues” for additional information regarding the different types of charters on which we employ our vessels. We have not employed our vessels on bareboat charters to date and expect that bareboat charters generally will not constitute a significant type of charter employment for our vessels in most future periods.

We will be evaluating vessel purchase opportunities to expand our fleet accretive to our earnings and cash flow. Additionally, while we do not have any plans to do so in the near term, we will consider selling vessels when favorable sales opportunities present themselves in the future. If, at the time of sale, the carrying value is lower than the sales price, we will realize a gain on sale, which will increase our earnings, but if, at the time of sale, the carrying value of a vessel is more than the sales price, we will realize a loss on sale, which will negatively impact our earnings.

67

Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations

We believe that the important measures for analyzing trends in the results of our operations consist of the following:

68

Our ability to control our fixed and variable expenses, including those for commission expenses, crew wages and related costs, the cost of insurance, expenses for repairs and maintenance, the cost of spares and consumable stores, tonnage taxes and other miscellaneous expenses also affect our financial results. Factors beyond our control, such as developments relating to market premiums for insurance and the value of the U.S. dollar compared to currencies in which certain of our expenses, primarily crew wages are denominated, can also cause our vessel operating expenses to increase. In addition, our net income may be affected by any financing arrangements, including any potential future interest rate swap arrangements, we enter into in the future.

Basis of Presentation and General Information

Revenues

Our voyage revenues are driven primarily by the number of vessels in our fleet, the number of voyage days during which our vessels generate revenues, the mix of charters our vessels are employed on and hire that our vessels earn under charters which, in turn, are affected by a number of factors, including our decisions relating to vessel acquisitions and disposals, the amount of time that we spend positioning our vessels, the amount of time that our vessels spend in dry dock undergoing repairs, maintenance and upgrade work, the age, condition and specifications of our vessels and the levels of supply and demand in the Handysize drybulk charter market, and the Aframax tanker market since our acquisition of the Afrapearl II (ex. Stealth Berana) in July 2023.

We may employ our vessels under either time or spot charters. We may also in the future employ our vessels under bareboat charters, which provide for the charterer to bear the cost of operating the vessel and as such typically market rates for bareboat charters are lower than those for time charters. Vessels operating on period charters, principally time and bareboat charters, provide more predictable cash flows, but can yield lower profit margins than vessels operating in the spot charter market during periods characterized by favorable market conditions. As a result, during the time our vessels are committed on period charters we will be unable, during periods of improving charter markets, to take advantage of improving charter rates as we could if our vessels were employed only on spot charters. Vessels operating in the spot charter market generate revenues that are less predictable but may enable us to capture increased profit margins during periods of high rates in the charter market, although we are exposed to the risk of having to seek to employ our vessels at low prevailing rates in weak market conditions, and may have a materially adverse impact on our overall financial performance. If we commit vessels on period charters, future spot market rates may be higher or lower than those rates at which we have time chartered our vessels.

Voyage Expenses

Voyage expenses include port and canal charges, bunker (fuel oil) expenses and commissions. These charges and expenses increase in periods during which vessels are employed on the spot market, because under these charters, these expenses are for the account of the vessel owner. Under period charters, these charges and expenses, including bunkers (fuel oil) but excluding commissions which are always paid by the vessel owner, are paid by the charterer. Bunkers (fuel oil) accounted for 39% of total voyage expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2023, 79.2% of total voyage expenses for the period from July 25, 2022 to September 30, 2022, 4.5% of total voyage expenses for the period from January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022 (Predecessor), 60.0% of total voyage expenses for the period from July 25, 2022 to December 31, 2022, nil for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 (Predecessor) and 7.8% of total voyage expenses for the period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021 (Predecessor). Commissions on hire are paid to our manager and/or third-party brokers. From delivery of the vessels comprising our fleet to Imperial Petroleum on September 21, 2022 and October 19, 2022, respectively, until the completion of the Spin-Off, Imperial Petroleum pays Stealth Maritime, and after the Spin-Off we pay Brave Maritime, a fixed brokerage commission of 1.25% on freight, hire and demurrage for each vessel based on our management agreement.

69

Vessel Operating Expenses

Vessel operating expenses include crew wages and related costs, the cost of insurance, expenses for repairs and maintenance, the cost of spares and consumable stores, tonnage taxes and other miscellaneous expenses. Our ability to control these fixed and variable expenses, also affects our financial results. In addition, the type of charter under which our vessels are employed (time, bareboat or spot charter) also affects our operating expenses because we do not pay the operating expenses of vessels that we deploy on bareboat charters. Factors beyond our control, some of which may affect the shipping industry in general, including, for instance, developments relating to market prices for insurance and regulations related to safety and environmental matters may also cause these expenses to increase.

Management Fees

For the period from June 21, 2023 to September 30, 2023, following the Spin-off, the nine-month period ended September 30, 2022, the period from January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022 and the period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021 (Predecessor), we paid Brave Maritime, our fleet manager, a fixed rate management fee of $440 per day for each vessel in our fleet under spot or time charter. For the period from January 1, 2023 to June 20, 2023, and the period from July 25, 2022 to December 31, 2022, we paid Stealth Maritime the same daily rates according to each vessel’s fleet employment status. Following the conclusion of the Spin- Off Distribution and pursuant to the management agreement with Brave Maritime rates remain the same. From delivery of the vessels comprising our fleet to Imperial Petroleum on September 21, 2022 and October 19, 2022, respectively, until the completion of the Spin-Off, Imperial Petroleum paid Stealth Maritime for these services pursuant to its management agreement with Stealth Maritime at the same fee levels, and Stealth Maritime subcontracted these services to Brave Maritime. Our Manager also receives a fee equal to 1.0% calculated on the price stated in the relevant memorandum of agreement for any vessel bought or sold by them on our behalf, excluding vessels contributed as it will be the case of the spin-off.

General and Administrative Expenses

We incur general and administrative expenses that consist primarily of legal fees, audit fees, office rental fees, officers and board remuneration or reimbursement, directors’ and officers’ insurance, listing fees and other general and administrative expenses. Our general and administrative expenses also include our direct compensation expenses and the value of non-cash executive services provided through, and other expenses arising from, our management agreement with Brave Maritime, our directors’ compensation and the value of the lease expense for the space we rent from Brave Maritime. For our compensation expenses, pursuant to our management agreement, we reimburse Brave Maritime for its payment of the compensation of our executive officers for the first 12 months following the spin- off and then our Board will agree upon any further management compensation. We expect the aggregate cash compensation to our officers in the first year following the Spin-Off to be approximately €0.4 million.

Inflation

Recently there has been a significant increase in inflation throughout the world economy. Such global inflationary pressures, and related central bank actions, have also resulted in higher prevailing interest rates, which would increase the interest rates payable under any floating rate financing agreements we enter into in the future. To date inflation has had a moderate impact on our vessel operating expenses. In particular, crew expenses increased significantly in 2021 and 2022, primarily due to the impact of COVID-19 (see “—Impact of COVID-19 on our Business”), and the cost of spares and stores increased moderately in 2022, which in turn resulted in increases in our vessel operating expenses in 2022 compared to 2021. In addition, increasing interest rates increased our financing expenses up to the time of the repayment of our outstanding floating rate debt in August 2022. Although the impact of COVID-19 on crew expenses and increases in other operating expenses leveled off in late 2022 and the first half of 2023, if inflation and interest rates were to increase further in the future it could result in further increased operating and potential financing expenses.

70

We continue to seek to control operating expenses, capital expenditures, financing and other costs through our regular cost-control processes, including seeking competitive bids for services and supplies where appropriate and managing the timing and location for incurring expenses to the extent feasible. We have not entered into any bunker fuel, interest rate or other hedging arrangements to date.

Depreciation and Dry docking

The carrying value of our vessels includes the original cost of the vessels plus capitalized expenses since acquisition relating to improvements and upgrading of the vessels, less accumulated depreciation and less any impairment. We depreciate our vessels on a straight-line basis, from the date they were originally built over their estimated useful lives, determined to be 25 years. Depreciation is based on cost less the estimated scrap value of the vessels which equals $350 per light weight ton. We expense costs associated with dry dockings and special and intermediate surveys as incurred which may affect the volatility of our results.

Interest Expense and Finance Costs

In August 2022, C3is Inc. Predecessor repaid $6.8 million of outstanding bank debt, net of deferred finance charges, which was secured by the vessels in our initial fleet, with cash generated from operations. As of September 30, 2023 and the date of this prospectus, we did not have any outstanding bank debt. We had a financial liability of $36.3 million relating to the remaining purchase price for our Aframax tanker, which bears interest at a rate of 8.1% per annum and is payable by July 14, 2024 in the total amount of $38.7 million. We expect, however, to incur indebtedness, on which we will incur interest expenses, under any new credit facilities we enter into to finance or refinance the purchase price of additional vessels we may agree to acquire. We may also incur indebtedness secured by the vessels in our initial fleet. We will also incur financing costs in connection with establishing those facilities, which will be deferred and amortized over the period of the facility, which we will also include in interest expense.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our combined financial statements for C3is Inc. Predecessor and our consolidated financial statements for C3is Inc., which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of those financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Critical accounting estimates are those that reflect significant judgments or uncertainties, and potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. We have described below what we believe are our most critical accounting estimates that involve a high degree of judgment and the methods of their application. For a description of all of our significant accounting policies, see Note 2 to the combined financial statements of C3is Inc. Predecessor and Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements of C3is Inc. included elsewhere herein.

Impairment or disposal of long-lived assets:

We follow the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Subtopic 360-10, “Property, Plant and Equipment” (“ASC 360-10”), which requires long-lived assets used in operations be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. On a quarterly basis, in case an impairment indicator exists, we perform an analysis of the anticipated undiscounted future net cash flows of our long-lived assets. If the carrying value of the related asset exceeds the undiscounted cash flows and the fair market value of the asset, the carrying value is reduced to its fair value and the difference is recorded as an impairment loss in the consolidated statement of operations.

71

We review certain indicators of potential impairment, such as vessel fair values, vessel sales and purchases, business plans and overall market conditions including any regulatory changes that may have a material impact on the vessel lives. The decline in the values of our vessels was considered to be an indicator of potential impairment. As of September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, we performed step one, the undiscounted cash flow test as required by the ASC guidance. We determined undiscounted projected net operating cash flows for each vessel with carrying value exceeding its fair value and compared it to the vessel’s carrying value. This assessment was made at the individual vessel level since separately identifiable cash flow information for each vessel was available. In developing estimates of future cash flows to be generated over remaining useful lives of the vessels, we made assumptions about the future, such as: (1) vessel charter rates, (2) vessel utilization rates, (3) vessel operating expenses, (4) dry docking costs, (5) vessel scrap values at the end of vessels’ remaining useful lives and (6) the remaining useful lives of the vessels. These assumptions were based on historical trends as well as future expectations in line with our historical performance and our expectations for future fleet utilization under our current fleet deployment strategy, vessel sales and purchases, and overall market conditions.

Projected cash flows were determined for the vessels by considering the revenues from existing charters as of September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, and revenue estimates based on nine-year historical average rates (base rate) for periods for which there is no charter in place. With regards to operating expenses and utilization rate, these were based on historical trends. Such assumptions are highly subjective.

The carrying values of our vessels may not represent their fair market value at any point in time since the market prices of second-hand vessels tend to fluctuate with changes in charter rates and the cost of new-buildings.

Sensitivity Analysis.

The impairment test is highly sensitive to variances in future charter rates. When we conducted the analysis of the impairment test as of September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 we also performed a sensitivity analysis related to the future cash flow estimates. Set forth below is an analysis, as of September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, of the percentage difference between the current actual average rates for our fleet compared with the base rates used in the impairment test as described above, as well as an analysis of the impact on our impairment analysis if we were to utilize the most recent five-year, three-year and one-year historical average rates, which shows the number of vessels whose carrying value would not have been recovered and the related impairment charge.

Although we believe that the assumptions used to evaluate potential impairment are reasonable and appropriate, such assumptions are highly subjective. There can be no assurance as to how long charter rates and vessel values will remain at their current levels or whether they will improve by any significant degree. Charter rates may remain at relatively low levels for some time, or decline, which could adversely affect our revenue and profitability, and future assessments of vessel impairment.

72

Based on the carrying value of each of our vessels held for use as of September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, and based on what we believe the charter-free market values of each of these vessels was as of these dates, two of our three owned vessels in the water had current carrying values above their market values. We believe that the aggregate carrying value of these vessels, assessed separately, exceeds their aggregate charter-free market value by approximately $9.3 million as of September 30, 2023 and $11.3 million as of December 31, 2022. This served as an indicator for impairment. The undiscounted cash flows of each vessel exceeded their carrying amount and as a result no impairment loss was recognized as of September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022.

Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company

We had less than $1.235 billion in revenue during our last fiscal year, which means that we qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, or JOBS Act. An emerging growth company may take advantage or specified reduced reporting and other burdens that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies. These provisions include:

We may take advantage of these provisions until the end of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the Spin-Off or such earlier time that we are no longer an emerging growth company. We will cease to be an emerging growth company if, among other things, we have more than $1.235 billion in “total annual gross revenues” during the most recently completed fiscal year. We may choose to take advantage of some, but not all, of these reduced burdens. For as long as we take advantage of the reduced reporting obligations, the information that we provide shareholders may be different from information provided by other public companies. We are choosing to “opt out” of the extended transition period relating to the exemption from new or revised financial accounting standards and as a result, we will comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for non-emerging growth public companies. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that our decision to opt out of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards is irrevocable.

Results of Operations

Nine months ended September 30, 2023

The average number of vessels in our fleet was 2.3 for the nine months ended September 30, 2023.

REVENUES—Voyage revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2023 were $15.0 million mainly as a result of the increase in the average number of our vessels. Total calendar days for our fleet were 625 days for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. Of the total calendar days in this period, 506 or 81% were time charter days. Our fleet operational utilization was 93.6% for this period.

VOYAGE EXPENSES—Voyage expenses were $3.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. Voyage expenses mainly included bunker costs of $1.3 million corresponding to 39% of total voyage expenses, and commissions to third parties of $0.7 million corresponding to 21% of total voyage expenses.

VESSEL OPERATING EXPENSES—Vessel operating expenses were $3.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. Operating expenses mainly included crew expenses of $1.9 million corresponding to

73

58% of total operating expenses, spares and consumables costs of $0.7 million representing 21%, and maintenance expenses of $0.3 million representing works and repairs on the vessels, corresponding to 9% of total vessel operating expenses.

DRY-DOCKING COSTS—Dry-docking costs were $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023 and mainly related to one of our vessels.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES—General and administrative expenses were $0.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023 mainly related to the portion of general and administrative expenses incurred by Imperial Petroleum, the former Parent of C3is Inc., that were allocated to C3is Inc, as well as to expenses incurred as a result of operating as a separate public company.

MANAGEMENT FEES – RELATED PARTY—Management fees – related party were $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. The daily management fees per vessel is $440 per day for vessels under time and spot charter.

DEPRECIATION—Depreciation expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2023 were $2.7 million.

NET INCOME—As a result of the above factors, we recorded net income of $3.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023.

Nine months ended September 30, 2022 (Predecessor)

The average number of vessels in our fleet was 1.30 for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 (Predecessor).

REVENUES—Voyage revenues amounted to $12.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022. Total calendar days for our fleet were 413 for the nine months ended September 30, 2022. Of the total calendar days in this period, 315 or 85% were time charter days, while our fleet operational utilization was 85%

VOYAGE EXPENSES—Voyage expenses were $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022. Voyage expenses mainly included commissions to third parties.

VESSEL OPERATING EXPENSES—Vessel operating expenses were $2.3 million for the nine months September 30, 2022. Operating expenses mainly included crew expenses of $1.2 million corresponding to 52.2% of total operating expenses, spares and consumables costs of $0.3 million representing 13.0%, and maintenance expenses of $0.3 million representing works and repairs on the vessels, corresponding to 13.0% of total vessel operating expenses.

DRY DOCKING COSTS—Dry docking costs were $0.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 as our drybulk carrier, the Eco Bushfire, underwent drydocking services along with ballast water system treatment installation.

MANAGEMENT FEES – RELATED PARTY—Management fees – related party were $0.2 million for the nine months period ended September 30, 2022. The daily management fees per vessel is $440 per day for vessels under time and spot charter.

DEPRECIATION—Depreciation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 was $0.5 million.

GAIN ON VESSEL SALE – RELATED PARTY —During the nine months period ended September 30, 2022, we sold to Imperial Petroleum Inc., the Eco Bushfire, delivered to Imperial Petroleum Inc., on September 21, 2022, for which an aggregate gain on the sale of vessel of $9.3 million was recognized.

74

NET INCOME—As a result of the above factors, we recorded net income of $16.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022.

Period from July 25, 2022 to December 31, 2022

The average number of vessels in our fleet was 1.74 for the period from July 25, 2022 to December 31, 2022.

REVENUES—Voyage revenues for the period from July 25, 2022 to December 31, 2022 were $3.3 million. Total calendar days for our fleet were 176 days for the period from July 25, 2022 to December 31, 2022. Of the total calendar days in this period, 131 or 74.4% were time charter days. Our fleet operational utilization was 75.6% for this period.

VOYAGE EXPENSES—Voyage expenses were $0.5 million for the period from July 25, 2022 to December 31, 2022. Voyage expenses mainly included bunker costs of $0.3 million corresponding to 60.0% of total voyage expenses, and commissions to third parties of $0.2 million corresponding to 40.0% of total voyage expenses.

VESSEL OPERATING EXPENSES—Vessel operating expenses were $0.9 million for the period from July 25, 2022 to December 31, 2022 or $5,092 per calendar day. Operating expenses mainly included crew expenses of $0.5 million corresponding to 55.6% of total operating expenses, spares and consumables costs of $0.2 million representing fitting costs for the recently delivered vessels representing 22.2%, and maintenance expenses of $0.1 million representing works and repairs on the recently delivered vessels, corresponding to 11.1% of total vessel operating expenses.

DRY DOCKING COSTS—Dry docking costs were $0.6 million for the period from July 25, 2022 to December 31, 2022 related to the dry docking of the dry bulk carrier Eco Angelbay.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES – RELATED PARTY—General and administrative expenses – related party were $0.1 million for the period from July 25, 2022 to December 31, 2022 related to Imperial Petroleum general and administrative expenses allocated to the carve-out entities of C3is Inc.

MANAGEMENT FEES – RELATED PARTY—Management fees – related party were $0.08 million for the period from July 25, 2022 to December 31, 2022. The daily management fees per vessel is $440 per day for vessels under time and spot charter.

DEPRECIATION—Depreciation expenses for the period from July 25, 2022 to December 31, 2022 were $0.6 million.

NET INCOME—As a result of the above factors, we recorded net income of $0.6 million for the period from July 25, 2022 to December 31, 2022.

Period from January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022 (Predecessor)

The average number of vessels in our fleet was 1.49 for the period from January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022 (Predecessor).

REVENUES—Voyage revenues amounted to $12.8 million for the period January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022 and $6.3 million for the period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021. The increase in voyage revenues by $6.5 million or 103.2% was due to the increase in the average number of vessels along with an improvement in market charter rates. Total calendar days for our fleet were 431 for the period from January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022 compared to 281 for the period March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021. Of the total calendar days for the period January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022, 369 or 85.6% were time charter days, while, our fleet operational utilization was 85.8%.

75

VOYAGE EXPENSES—Voyage expenses were $0.7 million for the period January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022 compared to $0.4 million for the period March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021. The increase in voyage expenses by $0.3 million or 75.0% was due to the increase in the size of our fleet by one drybulk carrier in May 2022. Voyage expenses for the period January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022 mainly included commissions to third parties of $0.6 million, corresponding to 85.7% of total voyage expenses.

VESSEL OPERATING EXPENSES—Vessel operating expenses were $2.4 million for the period January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022 compared to $1.5 million for the period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021. The increase in operating expenses by $0.9 million or 60.0% was mainly due to the increase of our fleet by one drybulk carrier in May 2022.

DRY DOCKING COSTS—Dry docking costs were $0.8 million for the Period January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022 compared to $0.1 million for the period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021. During the period January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022 our drybulk carrier, the Eco Bushfire, underwent drydocking services along with ballast water system treatment installation. The drydocking cost of $0.1 million for the period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021 related to the preparation for the Eco Bushfire drydocking services.

MANAGEMENT FEES – RELATED PARTY—Management fees – related party were $0.2 million for the period January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022 compared to $0.1 million for the period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021. The increase of management fees by $0.1 million is due to the increase of our fleet by one drybulk carrier in May 2022.

DEPRECIATION—Depreciation expenses for the period January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022 were $0.5 million. For the period March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021 depreciation expenses were $0.4 million. The $0.1 million increase between the two periods is attribute to the increase in the average number of our vessels.

GAIN ON VESSEL SALE- During the period January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022, we sold to Imperial Petroleum, and on September 21, 2022 delivered to Imperial Petroleum, the Eco Bushfire, for which an aggregate gain on the sale of vessel of $9.3 million was recognized.

NET INCOME—As a result of the above factors, we recorded net income of $17.5 million for the period January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022. For the period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021 net income was $3.6 million. The increase in net income of $13.9 million between the two periods is due to the increase of our fleet in conjunction with the improvement of market rates, along with a net gain on vessel sold of $9.3 million.

Period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021

The average number of vessels in our fleet was 0.77 for the period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021.

REVENUES—Voyage revenues for the period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021 were $6.3 million. Total calendar days for our fleet were 281 for the period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021. Of the total calendar days in the 2021 period, 275 or 97.9% were time charter days. Our fleet operational utilization was 97.9% for this period.

VOYAGE EXPENSES—Voyage expenses were $0.4 million for the period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021. Voyage expenses mainly included commissions to third parties of $0.3 million, corresponding to 75.0% of total voyage expenses.

76

VESSEL OPERATING EXPENSES—Vessel operating expenses were $1.5 million for the period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021 or $5,492 per calendar day. Crew expenses, which constitute a majority of our vessel operating expenses, were elevated largely due to the effects of COVID-19.

DRY DOCKING COSTS—Dry docking costs were $0.1 million for the period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021 related to the preparation for dry docking of the dry bulk carrier Eco Bushfire.

MANAGEMENT FEES – RELATED PARTY—Management fees – related party were $0.1 million for the period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021. The daily management fees per vessel is $440 per day for vessels under time and spot charter. This rate charge is effective from June 1, 2021 onwards as prior to this the vessel was managed by a third party.

DEPRECIATION—Depreciation expenses for the period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021 were $0.4 million.

NET INCOME—As a result of the above factors, we recorded net income of $3.6 million for the period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of September 30, 2023, we had cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash of $8.9 million.

Our principal sources of funds for our liquidity needs have been cash flows from operations, as well as contribution from our former Parent Company, and in July 2023 net proceeds of $4.7 million from a public offering of equity securities, as well as net proceeds of $6.1 million from a public offering of equity securities in January 2024. Potential additional sources of funds may include equity offerings and bank borrowings. We expect future equity offerings and other issuances of our Common Shares, preferred stock or other securities, which may dilute our common shareholders if issued at lower prices than the price they acquired their shares, as well as possibly bank borrowings, to be a significant component of the financing for our fleet growth plan. Our principal use of funds has been to acquire our vessels, maintain the quality of our vessels and fund working capital requirements.

Our liquidity needs, as of September 30, 2023, primarily relate to the funding of the remaining purchase price of $38.7 million for the Aframax tanker we agreed to acquire in July 2023 from a related party which is payable by July 14, 2024, expenses for operating our vessels, any vessel improvements that may be required and general and administrative expenses.

As of September 30, 2023, we had no outstanding bank debt and a financial liability of $36.3 million relating to the remaining purchase price for our Aframax tanker, which bears interest at a rate of 8.1% per annum and is payable in July 2024 in the total amount of $38.7 million which is inclusive of interest. We may incur indebtedness in the future to finance the growth of our fleet. We expect to finance the $38.7 million remaining acquisition consideration for our Aframax tanker with cash on hand, cashflow from operations, possible equity offerings and the incurrence of senior secured bank debt, if needed, within the twelve-month period following the vessel’s delivery to the Company. We may also incur indebtedness secured by the two drybulk vessels in our initial fleet.

Under our management agreement with Brave Maritime that we entered into in conjunction with the Spin-Off, we have contractual obligations relating to payments to Brave Maritime which represent management fees, executive compensation, of which about $0.9 million is expected to be payable within one year commencing September 30, 2023, based on the current size of our fleet.

We believe that the sources of funds available to us will be sufficient, subject to the successful completion of equity offerings or the incurrence of bank debt, to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements. We believe that, unless there is a major and sustained downturn in market conditions applicable to our specific

77

shipping industry segment and subject to the successful completion of equity offerings or the incurrence of bank debt, our internally generated cash flows will be sufficient to fund our current operations, including working capital requirements, for at least 12 months taking into account any possible capital commitments and debt service requirements.

Our dividend policy will also affect our liquidity position. See “Dividend Policy.” We also have approximately 600,000 Series A Convertible Preferred Shares outstanding as a result of the Spin-Off, which have a dividend rate of 5.00% per annum per $25.00 of liquidation preference per share.

Cash Flows

The following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in) operating, financing and investing activities for the periods presented.

As of September 30, 2023, we had a working capital deficit of $26.3 million, and our cash balance was $8.9 million.

Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities

Nine months ended September 30, 2023

Net cash provided by operating activities—was $5.4 million for the period ended September 30, 2023 as a result of our operating profitability.

Nine months ended September 30, 2022 (Predecessor)

Net cash provided by operating activities—was $8.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 mainly as a result of our operating profitability along with favorable movements in working capital.

Period from July 25, 2022 to December 31, 2022

Net cash provided by operating activities—was $1.1 million for the period July 25, 2022 to December 31, 2022 as a result of our operating profitability along with favorable movements in working capital.

Period from January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022 (Predecessor) compared to period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021

Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities—was operating cash inflows of $9.0 million for the period January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022 compared to an operating cash outflow of $0.01 million for the period March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021. This increase in operating cash flow of approximately $9.0 million was due to increased voyage revenues in conjunction with favorable movements in working capital.

78

Net cash (used in)/ provided by investing activities

Nine months ended September 30, 2023

Net cash used in investing activities—was $4.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023 relating to the 10% of the acquisition price of our Aframax tanker paid in July 2023.

Nine months ended September 30, 2022 (Predecessor)

Net cash provided by investing activities—was $4.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and represents net proceeds received from the sale of one of our vessels amounting to $20.4 million, net of capital deployed for the acquisition of one of our vessels amounting to $16.0 million.

Period from July 25, 2022 to December 31, 2022

Net cash used in investing activities—was $39.4 million for the period July 25, 2022 to December 31, 2022 as a result of $39.4 million used for vessel acquisitions.

Period from January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022 (Predecessor) compared to period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021

Net cash (used in)/ provided by investing activities—net cash provided by investing activities was $4.4 million for the period January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022, compared to net cash used in investing activities of $11.6 million for the period March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021. During the period from January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022 the Company had $20.3 million of proceeds from the sale of vessel Eco Bushfire partially offset by $16.0 million of capital used for the acquisition of the drybulk carrier Eco Angelbay. During the period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021, the Company used $11.6 million on vessel acquisition and vessel improvements.

Net cash provided by financing activities

Nine months ended September 30, 2023

Net cash provided by financing activities—was $7.9 million for the nine months September 30, 2023 representing net transfers from the former Parent Company amounting to $3.3 million and net proceeds from our equity offering concluded in July 2023 amounting to $4.6 million.

Nine months ended September 30, 2022 (Predecessor)

Net cash provided by financing activities—was $9.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 relating to shareholders’ contribution of $16.7 million, net of debt repayments of $7.3 million.

Period from July 25, 2022 to December 31, 2022

Net cash provided by financing activities—was $38.3 million for the period July 25, 2022 to December 31, 2022 representing net transfers from the parent company.

Period from January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022 (Predecessor) compared to period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021

Net cash provided by financing activities— was $9.4 million for the period from January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022, compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $12.4 million for the period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021. During the period from January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022 the Company received $16.7 million from its shareholders which were mainly utilized for the acquisition of the drybulk

79

carrier the Eco Angelbay and fully repaid its outstanding loan of $7.3 million within August 2022. During the period March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021, the Company received net shareholders contributions of $5.1 million and received proceeds from long term debt of $7.3 million.

As and when we identify assets that we believe will provide attractive returns, we generally expect to enter into specific term loan facilities and borrow amounts under these facilities as the vessels are delivered to us. This is the primary driver of the timing and amount of cash provided to us by our financing activities, however, from time to time to bolster our cash position and take advantage of financing opportunities, including to refinance the acquisition cost of vessels acquired earlier, we may in the future borrow under credit facilities secured by previously unencumbered vessels in our then-existing fleet.

We may make capital expenditures from time to time in connection with our vessel acquisitions. As of the date of this prospectus, we do not have any agreements to acquire additional vessels or for any other material capital expenditures. Please refer to section above “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Cash Flows” for a discussion of how we plan to cover our working capital requirements and possible capital commitments.

Trend Information

Drybulk Carrier Sector

Our results of operations depend primarily on the charter rates earned by our vessels. Over the course of 2021, the BDI registered a low of 1,303 on February 10, 2021 and a high of 5,650 on October 7, 2021. Similarly, in 2022, the BDI registered a low of 965 on August 31, 2022 and a high of 3,369 on May 23, 2022. In 2023, the BDI registered a low of 530 on February 16, 2023 and a high of 3,346 on December 4, 2023. On January 29, 2024, the BDI stood at 1,460.

Since the start of the financial crisis in 2008 the performance of the BDI has been characterized by high volatility, as the growth in the size of the drybulk fleet outpaced growth in vessel demand for an extended period of time.

Specifically, in the period from 2010 to 2020, the size of the fleet in terms of deadweight tons grew by an annual average of 6.4% while the corresponding growth in tonne-mile demand for drybulk carriers grew by 4.3%, resulting in a drop of about 61% in the value of the BDI over the period. In 2022, the total size of the drybulk fleet in deadweight tons rose by about 2.9%, compared to a decline in tonne-mile demand of 1.5%, which resulted in a year over year drop of about 34% in the value of the BDI. According to preliminary industry estimates, the total size of the drybulk fleet is expected to rise by about 2.3% in 2024, compared to tonne-mile demand growth of 1.6%.

Meanwhile, the war in Ukraine has amplified the volatility in the drybulk market with the BDI ranging between 965 and 3,369 in 2022. Specifically, the BDI ranged from a low of 965 on August 31, 2022 and a high of 3,369 on May 23, 2022. During 2023, the BDI ranged from a low of 530 on February 16, 2023 and a high of 3,346 on December 4, 2023, while it stood at 1,460 on January 29, 2024. Similarly, average handysize drybulk carrier spot rates ranged from a low of $10,833 per day on December 30, 2022 and a high of $33,333 per day on March 25, 2022. During 2023, average handysize drybulk carrier spot rates ranged from a low of $7,000 per day on August 4, 2023 and a high of $18,250 per day on December 15, 2023 and stood at $11,250 per day on January 26, 2024. In the short term, the effect of the invasion of Ukraine has been mildly positive for the drybulk market, yet the overall longer-term effect on ton-mile demand is uncertain given that cargoes such as grains, coal and iron ore exported previously from Ukraine and Russia will need to be substituted by cargoes from different sources. Overall, the BDI declined significantly in the second half of 2022, which was attributed in part to the easing of port congestion which positively affected the drybulk carrier demand in 2021 as well as to the weakening Chinese demand for drybulk commodities. Nevertheless, signs of recovering activity in Chinese import volumes were evident in 2023, supporting demand for drybulk commodities.

80

In addition, the continuing war in Ukraine led to increased economic uncertainty amidst fears of a more generalized military conflict or significant inflationary pressures, due to the increases in fuel and grain prices following the sanctions imposed on Russia. Whether the present dislocation in the markets and resultant inflationary pressures will transition to a long-term inflationary environment is uncertain, and the effects of such a development on charter rates, vessel demand and operating expenses in the sector in which we operate are uncertain. As described above, the initial effect of the invasion in Ukraine on the drybulk freight market ranged from neutral to positive, despite the short-term volatility in charter rates and increases on specific items of operating costs, mainly in the context of increased crew costs. If these conditions are sustained, the longer-term net impact on the drybulk freight market and our business would be difficult to predict. Historically, a positive relationship is registered between global inflation and drybulk vessel freight rates, and therefore the inflationary trends have not, and we do not expect them to have, a material impact on our results of operations. However, such events may have unpredictable consequences, and contribute to instability in global economy, a decrease in supply or cause a decrease in worldwide demand for certain goods and, thus, shipping. Regarding the possible impact of supply chain disruptions that have or may emanate from the military conflict in Ukraine, our operations have not been affected materially and we do not expect them to be in the future. Our vessels have made three voyages in 2022 and five voyages in 2023, carrying cargoes originating in the Russian ports of St. Petersburg and Ust-Luga, and may from time to time in the future carry cargoes originating in Russia, Ukraine or sanctioned countries, to the extent permitted by sanctions. It is possible that such cargoes, despite our belief that they are compliant with applicable sanctions, are alleged to have originated from sources that are not in compliance with such sanctions, which could result in penalties against us, including blacklisting of a vessel which would preclude chartering or selling such vessel, and negatively impact our acceptability to potential charterers and harm our business. In addition, it may not be possible for us to obtain war risk or other insurances for any vessel loading cargoes originating in such countries. Another potential area of impact has to do with the crewing of our vessels, as Ukraine, Russia and Belarus are all major crewing hubs for the shipping industry. As a result, we expect disruptions and increased costs might be encountered in sourcing crew members for our fleet. This is expected to be a general issue for the shipping industry, which we do not expect will materially worsen our competitive position in the market. See “Risk Factors—Regulatory and legal risks as a result of our global operations, including with respect to sanctioned countries, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial conditions.”

Since its outbreak in late 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused severe global disruptions and may continue to affect the economic conditions regionally as well as globally and otherwise impact our operations and the operations of our customers and suppliers. The reopening of the global economy and consequent increased demand across key drybulk commodities has positively affected our revenues. However, there is still high uncertainty on how the pandemic will evolve, with new variants emerging, forcing governments in affected countries to impose travel bans, quarantines and other emergency public health measures depending on the severity of the situation on each case. The zero-covid policy lockdowns in certain cities in China, which were only recently lifted, have caused disruptions in the country’s production and supply chain and further continuation or expansion of these lockdowns may have an adverse impact on the global economy, including volatility in the market for drybulk commodities. The long-term impacts on the drybulk sector remain uncertain. An increase in the severity or duration or a resurgence of the COVID-19 pandemic could have an adverse impact on the Company’s business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition, the carrying value of the Company’s assets and the fair values of the Company’s vessels.

See “Business—The Drybulk Shipping Industry.”

Tanker Vessel Sector

The tanker industry is both cyclical and volatile in terms of charter rates and profitability while geopolitical events affect the demand for seaborne transportation. Indicatively, during the ten-year period from the first quarter of 2014 through the fourth quarter of 2023, average earnings for an Aframax tanker fluctuated between $3,479 to $90,991 per day on a quarterly basis while they stood at $74,605 per day on January 26, 2024. Asset

81

values are also subject to price fluctuations and market cyclicality. For example, the price of a 5-year-old Aframax tanker fluctuated between $29.0 million and $70.5 million during the ten-year period from the first quarter of 2014 through the fourth quarter of 2023 while it stood at $72.0 million on January 26, 2024.

In late 2019 and during the first half of 2020, tanker shipping charter rates reached near record highs driven mainly by extraordinary floating storage demand and dropped to less than operating cost levels by the end of the year. Specifically, average Aframax tanker earnings spiked over $50,000 per day in the fourth quarter of 2019 as compared to approximately $5,700 per day in the fourth quarter of 2020, $7,648 per day in the second quarter of 2021 and $11,093 in the fourth quarter of 2021. The geopolitical crisis between Russia and Ukraine caused tanker charter rates to rise significantly. Indicatively, average Aframax tanker earnings stood at $32,266 per day in the first quarter of 2022, spiked to $90,991 per day in the fourth quarter of 2022, to subsequently decline in the fourth quarter of 2023 at $61,277 per day. Seaborne crude oil trade was significantly affected by the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic through disruptions arising from lockdowns in many countries and OPEC+ production cuts. Specifically, crude oil trade contracted by 2.3% to 292.2 million dwt in 2021 as compared to 7.6% or 298.2 million dwt in 2020. Nevertheless, in 2022 crude oil trade increased by 9.1% to 319.0 million dwt while in 2023 it is estimated to have increased by 5.9% or 337.6 million dwt and in 2024 it is expected to increase by 3.8% or 350.4 million dwt. The ongoing war in Ukraine and the embargo imposed by the European Union to Russian crude oil and refined petroleum products is creating shifts in trade patterns, benefiting longer-haul routes and thus supporting tanker tonne-mile demand and tanker vessel charter rates. Specifically, crude tanker demand in tonne-mile terms is estimated to have increased by 6.3% in 2023 and is currently expected to increase by 4.1% in 2024. On the supply side, the crude tanker trading fleet is estimated to have increased by 3.7% in 2023 and is currently expected to grow by just 0.2% in 2024 supported by a moderate tanker vessel orderbook which stood at 6.6% of fleet capacity at the end of December 2023 (Clarksons Oil &Trade Trades Outlook, January 2024).

See “Business—Tanker Shipping Industry.”

82

BUSINESS

History and Development of the Company

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands on July 25, 2022 to serve as the holding company of two subsidiaries each owning one of the drybulk carriers in our initial fleet that, Imperial Petroleum subsequently contributed to us in connection with the Spin-Off (as defined below). Imperial Petroleum contributed these subsidiaries to the Company and $5,000,000 in cash for working capital in return for our Common Shares and Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. On June 21, 2023, Imperial Petroleum distributed all of our outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Shares”), to its stockholders and warrantholders, which completed our separation from Imperial Petroleum (the “Spin Off” or the “Spin-Off”). Upon the completion of the Spin-Off on June 21, 2023, we began operating as a separate company from Imperial Petroleum, the Nasdaq-listed ship-owning company serving the petroleum products, crude oil and drybulk sectors of the international shipping industry, of which we were previously a part

We are a provider of international seaborne transportation services to drybulk charterers, including major national and private industrial users, commodity producers and traders, and oil producers, refineries and commodities traders and producers. As of the date of this prospectus, we own and operate a fleet of two drybulk carriers that transport major bulks such as iron ore, coal and grains, and minor bulks such as bauxite, phosphate and fertilizers, and one Aframax crude oil tanker that transports crude oil. The total cargo carrying capacity of our fleet is 179,804 dwt.

Our principal executive offices are located at 331 Kifissias Avenue, Erithrea 14561 Athens, Greece. Our telephone number from the United States is 011 30 210 625 0001. Our website address is http://c3is.pro. The information contained on or linked to from our website is not incorporated herein by reference.

Business Overview

Our fleet consists of two drybulk carriers that transport major bulks such as iron ore, coal and grains, and minor bulks such as bauxite, phosphate and fertilizers, and one Aframax crude oil tanker that transports crude oil. The total cargo carrying capacity of our fleet is 179,804 dwt. Please see information in the section “Our Fleet”, below.

Our business strategy is focused on carefully selecting the timing and the structure of our investments in vessels and reliably, safely and competitively operating the vessels we own, through our affiliate, Brave Maritime.

Our Fleet

As of March 1, 2024, the profile and deployment of our fleet is the following:

83

We plan to expand our fleet by investing in high-quality, Japanese or Korean-built drybulk carriers, which may include vessels in class sizes ranging from Handysize class vessels of 28,000-40,000 dwt to Capesize class vessels of 100,000+ dwt, and potentially tankers of all sizes. We may also acquire vessels in these or other seaborne transportation sectors in addition to the drybulk and tanker sectors, under favorable market conditions. We do not, however, currently have any agreements or commitments to acquire additional vessels. We also intend to take advantage of the cyclical nature of the market by buying and selling ships when we believe favorable opportunities exist.

We will deploy our drybulk carriers either on time charter trips or spot voyages of short term duration while our tanker vessel will mostly be employed in the spot market as conditions are favorable in the near term. In the long run, our fleet could potentially be employed on a mix of period charters, including time charters which can last up to several years, and spot market charters, which generally last from one to six months, and in pools, according to our assessment of market conditions. As of March 1, 2024, our dry bulk carriers were under time charter contracts expiring in April 2024, and our tanker was operating in the spot market.

We refer you to the risk factor entitled “The market values of our vessels may decline and over time may fluctuate significantly. When the market values of our vessels are low, we may incur a loss on sale of a vessel or record an impairment charge, which may adversely affect our profitability and possibly lead to defaults under loan agreements” and the discussion in the section of this prospectus entitled “Risk Factors – Industry Risk Factors”.

Commercial and Technical Management of Our Fleet

We have entered into a management agreement with Brave Maritime, pursuant to which Brave Maritime will provide us with technical, administrative, commercial and certain other services. Brave Maritime is a leading ship-management company based in Greece, established in 1987 in order to provide shipping companies with a range of services. Our manager’s safety management system is ISM certified in compliance with IMO’s regulations by Lloyd’s Register. In relation to the technical services, Brave Maritime is responsible for arranging for the crewing of the vessels, the day to day operations, inspections and vetting, maintenance, repairs, dry-docking and insurance. Administrative functions include, but are not limited to accounting, back-office, reporting, legal and secretarial services. In addition, Brave Maritime provides services for the chartering of our vessels and monitoring thereof, freight collection, and sale and purchase.

Under the management agreement with Brave Maritime, we pay Brave Maritime a fixed management fee of $440 per vessel operating under a voyage or time charter per day on a monthly basis in advance, pro-rated for the calendar days we own the vessels. We pay a fixed fee of $125 per vessel per day for each of our vessels operating on bareboat charter. We are obligated to pay Brave Maritime a fee equal to 1.25% of the gross freight, demurrage and charter hire collected from the employment of our vessels. Brave Maritime also earns a fee equal to 1.0% of the contract price of any vessel bought or sold by them on our behalf.

The initial term of our management agreement with Brave Maritime will expire on December 31, 2025. Unless six months’ notice of non-renewal is given by either party prior to the end of the then current term, this agreement will automatically extend for additional 12-month periods.

For additional information about the management agreement, including the calculation of management fees and termination provisions, see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Management and Other Fees.”

Crewing and Employees

Brave Maritime ensures that all seamen have the qualifications and licenses required to comply with international regulations and shipping conventions, and that our vessels employ experienced and competent

84

personnel. Since 2021, Hellenic Manning Overseas Inc, formerly known as Navis Maritime Services Inc., based in Manila, has been responsible for providing the crewing of our fleet, under Brave Maritime’s technical management. These responsibilities include training, compensation, transportation and additional insurance of the crew.

Chartering of the Fleet

We, through Brave Maritime, manage the employment of our fleet. We deploy our vessels on period charters, including time and bareboat charters that can last up to several years, and spot market charters (through voyage charters and short-term time charters), which generally last from one to six months, subject to market conditions. Time and bareboat charters are for a fixed period of time, but could also occasionally include optional periods giving charterers the right to extend the charter. A voyage charter is generally a contract to carry a specific cargo from a loading port to a discharging port for an agreed-upon total charge. Under voyage charters we pay for voyage expenses such as port, canal and fuel costs. Under a time charter the charterer pays for voyage expenses while under a bareboat charter the charterer pays for voyage expenses and operating expenses such as crewing, supplies, maintenance and repairs including special survey and dry-docking costs.

Vessels operating in the spot market generate revenues that are less predictable but may enable us to capture increased profit margins during periods of improvements in drybulk charter rates, although we are then exposed to the risk of declining drybulk charter rates.

For our tanker vessel current chartering strategy, due to favorable market rates, is either spot employment or short time charter employment up to a period of three months. As charter market conditions change, we may consider longer term employment for our tanker.

Typically spot market charters can last from a few days up to two months. If we commit vessels to period charters, future spot market rates may be higher or lower than those rates at which we have period chartered our vessels.

In formulating our chartering strategy, we evaluate past, present and future performance of the freight markets and balance the mix of our chartering arrangements in order to achieve optimal results for the fleet. We will deploy our drybulk carriers either on time charter trips or spot voyages of short term duration while our tanker vessel will mostly be employed in the spot market as conditions are favorable in the near term. In the long run, our fleet could potentially be employed on a mix of period charters, including time charters which can last up to several years, and spot market charters, which generally last from one to six months, and in pools, according to our assessment of market conditions. As of March 1, 2024, our dry bulk carriers were under time charter contracts, expiring in February and April 2024, and our tanker was operating in the spot market. See “—Current Charters” below.

Our vessels trade globally. Some of the areas where we usually operate are the Middle East- Far East range, the Mediterranean, North West Europe range, Africa, USA and Latin America. As freight rates usually vary between these areas as well as voyage and operating expenses, we evaluate such parameters when positioning our vessels for new employment.

Set forth below are brief descriptions of the types of charters under which our vessels may be employed.

85

Current Charters

Our tanker is currently operating in the spot market. Each of our two drybulk carriers vessels are currently fixed on time charter trips with durations of less than three months. Specifically, the Eco Angelbay and Eco Bushfire, are employed on time charter trips, scheduled to expire in February and March 2024. A time charter trip is a contract to charter a vessel for a fixed period of time at a set daily rate and can last from a few days up to several years. Under our time charters the Charterer pays for most voyage expenses, which generally include, among other things, daily hire, fuel costs, port and canal charges, pilotages, towages, agencies, commissions, extra war risks insurance and any other expenses related to the cargoes or ports, and Owners pay for vessel

86

operating expenses, which generally include, among other costs, costs for crewing, provisions, stores, lubricants, insurance, maintenance and repairs, dry-docking and intermediate and special surveys. A time charter trip is usually a short term time charter where the vessel performs a single voyage between load port(s) and discharge port(s) and the Charterer pays a fixed daily hire rate on a semi-monthly or monthly basis for use of the vessel. The difference between a time charter trip and a voyage charter trip is in the payment methodology for use of the vessel and the respective financial and commercial responsibilities between Charterer and Ship-owner for vessel’s operating as described under time charter and voyage charter.

The following discussion describes the material terms of the current trip time charters for our two drybulk vessels, which we will need to replace with new employment for our vessels upon expiration of such charters in February and March 2024.

Initial Term, Extensions and Redelivery. The initial terms of the time charters for the Eco Angelbay and Eco Bushfire, which both began in August 2023, and will terminate in February and March 2024. The charters have a fixed term and do not include any extension options and provide for redelivery of the ship to us at the expiration of the term, or upon earlier termination of the charter (as described below).

Hire Rate Provisions. “Hire” rate refers to the basic payment from the customer for use of the ship. Under all of our time charters, the hire rate is payable to us every 15 days in advance in U.S. dollars. Our charters contain fixed daily hire rate provisions that apply during the fixed term of the charters.

Off-Hire. When a ship is “off-hire”, or not available for service, a time charterer generally is not required to pay the hire rate, and we remain responsible for all costs. A ship generally will be deemed off-hire under our time charters if there is a specified time outside of the annual allowance period when the ship is not available for the charterer’s use due to, among other things, operational deficiencies (including the failure to maintain a certain guaranteed speed), dry-docking for examination or painting bottom, maintenance or inspection, equipment breakdowns, deficiency of personnel or neglect of duty by the ship’s officers or crew, deviation from course, or delays due to arrests, requisition, ship detentions or similar problems. The vessels are only to be drydocked during the term of the charters in the event of emergency, in which case, the vessels would be considered to be off-hire under these trip time charters during such periods.

Ship Management and Maintenance. Under the charters, we are responsible for the technical management of our vessels, including engaging and providing qualified crews, maintaining the vessel, arranging supply of stores and equipment, periodic dry-docking, cleaning and painting and ensuring compliance with applicable regulations, including licensing and certification requirements.

Termination. Under our time charters, each party has the right to cancel the charter under certain circumstances, which include, our right to withdraw the vessel from the service of the charterers for failure to make punctual and regular payment of the hire and each party’s right to terminate a charter if the vessel is already performing an employment to which a sanction or trading prohibition is applied after entry into the charter.

Customers

Our assessment of a charterer’s financial condition and reliability is an important factor in negotiating employment for our vessels. Principal charterers include national, major and other independent companies and commodities traders, and industrial users of those products. For the nine months ended September 30, 2023, we had three customers accounting for 62% of our total revenues, while for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 (Predecessor), we had four customers accounting for 85% of our total revenues. For the period from January 1, 2022 to October 18, 2022 (Predecessor) and for the period from July 25, 2022 to December 31, 2022 we had four customers in both periods accounting for 80.1% and 99.3% of our total revenues respectively. For the period from March 12, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021 we had two customers accounting for 99.6% of our total

87

revenues. In addition, any vessels employed under bareboat charter in the future may be sub-chartered to third parties.

Our fleet’s average age is slightly above the average age of the drybulk carrier and tanker fleet, and as our vessels age we may have difficulty competing with younger, more technologically advanced drybulk carriers for charters from top-tier charterers. In these circumstances, we may also be forced to charter our vessels to less creditworthy charterers, either because top tier charters will not charter older and less technologically advanced vessels or will only charter such vessels at lower contracted charter rates than we are able to obtain from other charterers.

Dry-BMS (RightShip Standards)

This program is designed to allow ship managers to measure their SMS against agreed industry standards, with the aim of improving fleet performance and risk management. This will ensure that policies align with the industry’s best practice to both advance our vessels’ performance and attain high standards of health, safety, security and pollution prevention. The draft guidelines focus on 30 areas of management practice across the four most serious risk areas faced in vessel operations: performance, people, plant and process. This grades the excellence of a company’s SMS against measurable expectations and targets without involving the burdens of excessive inspections. This standard is not meant to replace any pre-existing system or rule but rather to enhance their existing application and raise the levels of excellence achieved. The minimum benefits of this venture would (a) cover all relevant ship management issues in one document, (b) be relevant to the entire dry bulk shipping industry worldwide, (c) complement other statutory requirements and industry guidance and (d) be frequently evaluated to drive continuous improvement across the management companies on an international level.

Environmental and other Regulations

Government regulations significantly affect the ownership and operation of our vessels. They are subject to international conventions and national, state and local laws and regulations in force in the countries in which they may operate or are registered.

A variety of governmental and private entities subject our vessels to both scheduled and unscheduled inspections. These entities include the local port authorities (United States Coast Guard, harbor master or equivalent), classification societies, flag state administration (country of registry), charterers and particularly terminal operators. Certain of these entities require us to obtain permits, licenses, certificates and financial assurances for the operation of our vessels. Failure to maintain necessary permits or approvals could require us to incur substantial costs or result in the temporary suspension of operation of one or more of our vessels.

We believe that the heightened level of environmental and quality concerns among insurance underwriters, regulators and charterers is leading to greater inspection and safety requirements on all vessels and may accelerate the scrapping of older vessels throughout the industry. Increasing environmental concerns have created a demand for vessels that conform to the stricter environmental standards. We are required to maintain operating standards for all of our vessels that emphasize operational safety, quality maintenance, continuous training of our officers and crews and compliance with United States and international regulations. We believe that the operation of our vessels is in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations. However, because such laws and regulations are frequently changed and may impose increasingly stricter requirements, any future requirements may limit our ability to do business, increase our operating costs, force the early retirement of one or more of our vessels, and/or affect their resale value, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Environmental Regulations—International Maritime Organization (“IMO”)

The IMO, the United Nations agency for maritime safety and the prevention of pollution by ships, has negotiated international conventions relating to pollution by ships. In 1973, IMO adopted the MARPOL, which

88

has been periodically updated with relevant amendments. MARPOL addresses pollution from ships by oil, noxious liquid substances carried in bulk, harmful substances carried by sea in packaged form, sewage, garbage, and air emissions. Our vessels are subject to standards imposed by the IMO.

In September 1997, the IMO adopted MARPOL Annex VI to address air pollution from ships. Effective in May 2005, Annex VI set limits on SOx and nitrogen oxide (“NOx”) emissions from ship exhausts and prohibited deliberate emissions of ozone depleting substances, such as chlorofluorocarbons. Annex VI also included a global cap on the sulfur content of fuel oil and allowed for special areas to be established with more stringent controls on emissions. Options for complying with the requirements of Annex VI include use of low sulfur fuels, modifications to vessel engines, or the addition of post combustion emission controls. Annex VI has been ratified by some, but not all IMO member states. Vessels that are subject to Annex VI must obtain an International Air Pollution Prevention Certificate evidencing compliance with Annex VI.

In October 2008, the IMO adopted amendments to Annex VI, and the United States ratified the Annex VI amendments in October 2008. Beginning in 2011 the amendments required a progressive reduction of sulfur levels in bunker fuels to be phased in by 2020 and imposed more stringent NOx emission standards on marine diesel engines, depending on their date of installation. Since January 1, 2020, the amended Annex VI required that fuel oil contain no more than 0.50% sulfur. It is up to individual parties to MARPOL to enforce fines and sanctions, and several major port state regimes have announced plans to do so. We may incur costs to comply with the amended Annex VI requirements.

We currently have no committed capital expenditure obligations or plans for the installation of scrubbers on our vessels. To comply with emissions regulations, our vessels are not retrofitted with scrubbers need to use low sulfur fuel containing 0.5% sulfur content, which is currently more expensive than standard marine fuel containing 3.5% sulfur content. If the cost differential between low sulfur fuel and high sulfur fuel is significantly higher than anticipated, or if low sulfur fuel is not available at ports on certain trading routes, it may not be feasible or competitive to operate vessels on certain trading routes without installing scrubbers or without incurring deviation time to obtain compliant fuel. Our vessels may therefore face difficulties in competing with vessels equipped with scrubbers. See “Risk Factors-Industry Risk Factors-Environmental regulations in relation to climate change and greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions may increase operational and financial restrictions, and environmental compliance costs, and our non–scrubber fitted vessels may face difficulties in competing with scrubber-fitted vessels.”

More stringent emission standards apply in coastal areas designated by the IMO as SOx Emission Control Areas, or ECAs, such as the Baltic and North Seas, United States (including Hawaii) and Canadian (including the French territories of St. Pierre and Miquelon) coastal areas, and the United States Caribbean Sea (including Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands). Similar restrictions apply in Icelandic and inland Chinese waters. Specifically, as of January 1, 2019, China expanded the scope of its Domestic Emission Control Areas to include all coastal waters within 12 nautical miles of the mainland. Vessels operating within an ECA or an area with equivalent standards must use fuel with a sulfur content that does not exceed 0.10%. Additionally, two new NOx ECAs, the Baltic Sea and the North Sea, will be enforced for ships constructed (keel laying) on or after January 1, 2021, or existing ships which replace an engine with “non-identical” engines, or install an “additional” engine. Other ECAs may be designated, and the jurisdictions in which our vessels operate may adopt more stringent emission standards independent of IMO. We have obtained International Air Pollution Prevention Certificates for all of our vessels and believe they are compliant in all material respects with current Annex VI requirements.

Many countries have ratified and follow the liability plan adopted by the IMO and set out in the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage of 1969 (the “CLC”) (the United States, with its separate OPA regime described below, is not a party to the CLC). This convention generally applies to vessels that carry oil in bulk as cargo. Under this convention and depending on whether the country in which the damage results is a party to the 1992 Protocol to the CLC, the registered owner of a regulated vessel is strictly

89

liable for pollution damage in the territorial waters or exclusive economic zone of a contracting state caused by the discharge of any oil from the ship, subject to certain defenses. Under an amendment to the 1992 Protocol that became effective on November 1, 2003, for vessels of 5,000 to 140,000 gross tons, liability per incident is limited to 4.51 million Special Drawing Rights (“SDR”) plus 631 SDR for each additional gross ton over 5,000. For a vessel over 140,000 gross tons, liability is limited to 89.77 million SDR. The SDR is an International Monetary Fund unit pegged to a basket of currencies. The right to limit liability under the CLC is forfeited where the spill is caused by the owner’s actual fault and, under the 1992 Protocol, where the spill is caused by the owner’s intentional or reckless conduct. Vessels trading in states that are parties to the CLC must provide evidence of insurance covering the liability of the owner. In jurisdictions where the CLC has not been adopted, various legislative schemes or common law regimes govern, and liability is imposed either on the basis of fault or in a manner similar to that convention. We believe that our protection and indemnity insurance will cover any liability under the CLC.

In 2001, the IMO adopted the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, or the Bunker Convention, which imposes strict liability on ship owners for pollution damage caused by discharges of bunker oil in jurisdictional waters of ratifying states. The Bunker Convention also requires registered owners of ships over 1,000 gross tons to maintain insurance for pollution damage in an amount equal to the limits of liability under the applicable national or international limitation regime (but not exceeding the amount calculated in accordance with the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims of 1976, as amended). Because the Bunker Convention does not apply to pollution damage governed by the CLC, it applies only to discharges from any of our vessels that are not transporting oil. The Bunker Convention entered into force on November 21, 2008. Liability limits under the Bunker Convention were increased as of June 2015. In jurisdictions where the Bunker Convention has not been adopted, such as the United States, liability for spill or releases of oil from ship’s bunkers typically is determined by national or other domestic laws in the jurisdiction where the events occur.

The IMO adopted the BWM Convention in February 2004. The Convention’s implementing regulations call for a phased introduction of mandatory ballast water exchange requirements, to be replaced in time with mandatory concentration limits. The BWM Convention took effect on September 8, 2017. Many of the implementation dates originally contained in the BWM Convention had already passed prior to its effectiveness, so that the period for installation of mandatory ballast water exchange requirements would be very short, with several thousand ships per year needing to install the systems. Consequently, the IMO Assembly passed a resolution in December 2013 revising the dates for implementation of the ballast water management requirements so that they are triggered by the entry into force date. In effect, this makes all vessels constructed before September 8, 2017 “existing” vessels, allowing for the installation of ballast water management systems on such vessels at the first renewal International Oil Pollution Prevention (“IOPP”) survey following entry into force of the BWM Convention. In July 2017, the implementation scheme was further changed to require vessels with IOPP certificates expiring between September 8, 2017 and September 8, 2019 to comply at their second IOPP renewal. All ships must have installed a ballast water treatment system by September 8, 2024. Each vessel in our current fleet has ballast water treatment systems installed and has been issued with an International Ballast Water Management Certificate by the classification society with respect to the applicable IMO regulations and guidelines. The cost of compliance could increase for our vessels as a result of these requirements, although it is difficult to predict the overall impact of such a requirement on our operations.

The operation of our vessels is also affected by the requirements set forth in the ISM Code of the IMO. The ISM Code requires ship owners and bareboat charterers to develop and maintain an extensive SMS that includes the adoption of a safety and environmental protection policy setting forth instructions and procedures for safe operation and describing procedures for dealing with emergencies. Vessel operators must obtain a “Safety Management Certificate” from the government of the vessel’s flag state to verify that it is being operated in compliance with its approved SMS. The failure of a ship owner or bareboat charterer to comply with the ISM Code may subject such party to increased liability, decrease available insurance coverage for the affected vessels

90

and result in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports. Currently, each of the vessels in our fleet is ISM code-certified. However, there can be no assurance that such certification will be maintained indefinitely.

Environmental Regulations—The United States Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA”) and the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”)

The United States Oil Pollution Act of 1990, or OPA, established an extensive regulatory and liability regime for the protection and cleanup of the environment from oil spills. OPA applies to discharges of any oil from a vessel, including discharges of fuel oil (bunkers) and lubricants. OPA affects all owners and operators whose vessels trade in the United States, its territories and possessions or whose vessels operate in United States waters, which include the United States’ territorial sea and its two hundred nautical mile exclusive economic zone. The United States has also enacted the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, or CERCLA, which applies to the discharge of hazardous substances other than oil, whether on land or at sea. OPA and CERCLA both define “owner and operator” in the case of a vessel as any person owning, operating or chartering by demise, the vessel. Accordingly, both OPA and CERCLA impact our operations.

Under OPA, vessel owners, operators and bareboat charterers are “responsible parties” and are jointly, severally and strictly liable (unless the discharge of pollutants results solely from the act or omission of a third party, an act of God or an act of war) for all containment and clean-up costs and other damages arising from discharges or threatened discharges of pollutants from their vessels. OPA broadly defines these other damages to include:

The current limits of OPA liability for double-hulled tank vessels larger than 3,000 gross tons are the greater of $2,300 per gross ton or $19,943,400, subject to adjustment for inflation by the United States Coast Guard every three years. These limits of liability do not apply if an incident was directly caused by violation of applicable United States federal safety, construction or operating regulations or by a responsible party’s gross negligence or willful misconduct, or if the responsible party fails or refuses to report the incident or to cooperate and assist in connection with oil removal activities.

OPA requires owners and operators of vessels over 300 gross tons to establish and maintain with the United States Coast Guard evidence of financial responsibility sufficient to meet their potential liabilities under the OPA. Under the United States Coast Guard regulations implementing OPA, vessel owners and operators may evidence their financial responsibility by showing proof of insurance, surety bond, self-insurance, or guaranty. Under the OPA regulations, an owner or operator of a fleet of vessels is required only to demonstrate evidence of financial responsibility in an amount sufficient to cover the vessels in the fleet having the greatest maximum liability under OPA.

CERCLA contains a similar liability regime whereby owners and operators of vessels are liable for cleanup, removal and remedial costs, as well as damage for injury to, or destruction or loss of, natural resources, including the reasonable costs associated with assessing same, and health assessments or health effects studies. There is no liability if the discharge of a hazardous substance results solely from the act or omission of a third party, an act of God or an act of war. Liability under CERCLA is limited to the greater of $300 per gross ton or $5 million for vessels carrying a hazardous substance as cargo and the greater of $300 per gross ton or $500,000 for any other

91

vessel. These limits do not apply (rendering the responsible person liable for the total cost of response and damages) if the release or threat of release of a hazardous substance resulted from willful misconduct or negligence, or the primary cause of the release was a violation of applicable safety, construction or operating standards or regulations. The limitation on liability also does not apply if the responsible person fails or refused to provide all reasonable cooperation and assistance as requested in connection with response activities where the vessel is subject to OPA.

We currently maintain, for each of our vessels, pollution liability coverage insurance in the amount of $1 billion per vessel per incident. In addition, we carry hull and machinery and protection and indemnity insurance to cover the risks of fire and explosion. Under certain circumstances, fire and explosion could result in a catastrophic loss. While we believe that our present insurance coverage is adequate, not all risks can be insured, and there can be no guarantee that any specific claim will be paid, or that we will always be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates. If the damages from a catastrophic spill exceeded our insurance coverage, it would have a severe effect on us and could possibly result in our insolvency.

OPA and CERCLA both require owners and operators of vessels to establish and maintain with the United States Coast Guard evidence of financial responsibility sufficient to meet the maximum amount of liability to which the particular responsible person may be subject as discussed above. Under the self-insurance provisions, the ship owner or operator must have a net worth and working capital, measured in assets located in the United States against liabilities located anywhere in the world, that exceeds the applicable amount of financial responsibility. We have complied with the United States Coast Guard regulations by providing a financial guaranty evidencing sufficient self-insurance.

OPA specifically permits individual states to impose their own liability regimes with regard to oil pollution incidents occurring within their boundaries, and some states have enacted legislation providing for unlimited liability for oil spills. In some cases, states, which have enacted such legislation, have not yet issued implementing regulations defining vessels owners’ responsibilities under these laws. We intend to comply with all applicable state regulations in the ports where our vessels call.

Environmental Regulations—Other Environmental Initiatives

The EU has adopted legislation that: (1) requires member states to refuse access to their ports to certain sub-standard vessels, according to vessel type, flag and number of previous detentions; (2) creates an obligation on member states to inspect at least 25% of vessels using their ports annually and provides for increased surveillance of vessels posing a high risk to maritime safety or the marine environment; (3) provides the EU with greater authority and control over classification societies, including the ability to seek to suspend or revoke the authority of negligent societies; and (4) requires member states to impose criminal sanctions for certain pollution events, such as the unauthorized discharge of tank washings. It is impossible to predict what additional legislation or regulations, if any, may be promulgated by the EU or any other country or authority.

On March 23, 2012, the United States Coast Guard adopted ballast water discharge standards under the U.S. National Invasive Species Act, or NISA. The regulations, which became effective on June 21, 2012, set maximum acceptable discharge limits for living organisms and established standards for ballast water management systems, and they are consistent with the requirements under the BWM Convention described above. The requirements are being phased in based on the size of the vessel and its next dry docking date. As of the date of this prospectus, the United States Coast Guard has approved forty Ballast Water Treatment Systems. A list of approved equipment can be found on the Coast Guard Maritime Information Exchange web page. Several U.S. states, such as California, have also adopted more stringent legislation or regulations relating to the permitting and management of ballast water discharges compared to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) regulations.

The U.S. Clean Water Act (“CWA”) prohibits the discharge of oil or hazardous substances in navigable waters and imposes strict liability in the form of penalties for any unauthorized discharges. The CWA also

92

imposes substantial liability for the costs of removal, remediation and damages and complements the remedies available under OPA. Under EPA regulations we are required to obtain a CWA permit to discharge ballast water and other wastewaters incidental to the normal operation of our vessels if we operate within the three mile territorial waters or inland waters of the United States. This permit, which the EPA has designated as the Vessel General Permit for Discharges Incidental to the Normal Operation of Vessels, or VGP, incorporates the current United States Coast Guard requirements for ballast water management, as well as supplemental ballast water requirements, and includes requirements applicable to 26 specific discharge streams, such as deck runoff, bilge water and gray water. The United States Coast Guard and the EPA have entered into a memorandum of understanding which provides for collaboration on the enforcement of the VGP requirements. As a result, the United States Coast Guard includes the VGP as part of its normal Port State Control inspections. The EPA issued a VGP that became effective in December 2013. Among other things, it contained numeric ballast water discharge limits for most vessels and more stringent requirements for exhaust gas scrubbers and required the use of environmentally friendly lubricants. We have submitted NOIs (Notices Of Intent) for Discharges Incidental to the Normal Operation of a Vessel under the 2013 VGP to the U.S. EPA for all our ships trading in U.S. waters. The 2013 VGP was set to expire on December 13, 2018; however, its provisions will remain in effect until the regulations under the 2018 Vessel Incidental Discharge Act (“VIDA”) are final and enforceable. VIDA, signed into law on December 4, 2018, establishes a new framework for the regulation of vessel incidental discharges under CWA Section 312(p). VIDA requires the EPA to develop performance standards for those discharges within two years of enactment, and requires the United States Coast Guard to develop implementation, compliance, and enforcement regulations within two years of the EPA’s promulgation of its performance standards. All provisions of the 2013 VGP will remain in force and effect until the United States Coast Guard regulations under VIDA are finalized. On October 26, 2020, the EPA published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking – Vessel Incident Discharge National Standards of Performance in the Federal Register for public comment. The comment period closed on November 25, 2020. Compliance with the EPA and United States Coast Guard ballast water management regulations could require the installation of equipment on our vessels to treat ballast water before it is discharged or the implementation of other port facility disposal arrangements at potentially substantial cost, or may otherwise restrict our vessels from entering United States waters.

Climate Control Initiatives

Although the Kyoto Protocol requires adopting countries to implement national programs to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, emissions of greenhouse gases from international shipping are not currently subject to the Kyoto Protocol. The Kyoto Protocol was extended to 2020 at the 2012 United Nations Climate Change Conference, with the hope that a new climate change treaty would be adopted by 2015 and come into effect by 2020. The Paris Agreement adopted under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in December 2015 contemplates commitments from each nation party thereto to take action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and limit increases in global temperatures but did not include any restrictions or other measures specific to shipping emissions. However, restrictions on shipping emissions are likely to continue to be considered and a new treaty may be adopted in the future that includes restrictions on shipping emissions. International or multi-national bodies or individual countries may adopt their own climate change regulatory initiatives. The IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee adopted two sets of mandatory requirements to address greenhouse gas emissions from shipping that entered into force in January 2013. The Energy Efficiency Design Index establishes minimum energy efficiency levels per capacity mile and applies to new vessels of 400 gross tons or greater. Currently operating vessels must develop and implement Ship Energy Efficiency Plans. By 2025, all new ships built must be 30% more energy efficient than those built in 2014, but it is likely that the IMO will increase these requirements such that new ships must be up to 50% more energy efficient than those built in 2014 by 2022. These new requirements could cause us to incur additional costs to comply. Draft MARPOL amendments released in November 2020 and adopted in June 2021 build on the EEDI and SEEMP by requiring ships to reduce carbon intensity based on a new Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index and reduce operational carbon intensity reductions based on a new operational carbon intensity indicator, in line with the IMO strategy which aims to reduce carbon intensity of international shipping by 40% by 2030. The EEXI, which entered into force in January 2023, requires alterations to a vessel’s design, machinery or

93

arrangements to meet a certain goal of CO2 grams emitted per capacity tonne mile under certain reference conditions. This measure accounts for the vessel’s engine power, fuel consumption and CO2 conversion capacity, all of which make it impossible to effect EEXI compliance by merely reducing the ship’s speed or cargo load. Alongside the EEXI, a mandatory Carbon Intensity Indicator (“CII”) was introduced on January 1, 2023. This measure of annual efficiency is used to rate vessels based on the grams of CO2 they emit per dwt-mile, giving all cargo vessels above 5,000 GT a rating of A to E every year. The rating thresholds will become increasingly stringent towards 2030. For ships that achieve a D rating for three consecutive years or an E rating, a corrective action plan needs to be developed as part of the SEEMP and approved. These changes were accompanied by the introduction of the so-called “Enhanced SEEMP,” a strengthened version of SEEMP that includes new mandatory content, such as a CII target implementation plan, on top of being subject to approval by appropriate authorities. These new requirements for existing ships will be reviewed by the end of 2025, with particular focus on the enforcement of the carbon intensity rating requirements.

The IMO is also considering the development of market-based mechanisms for limiting greenhouse gas emissions from ships, but it is impossible to predict the likelihood of adoption of such a standard or the impact on our operations. In April 2015, the EU adopted regulations requiring the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions from marine vessels (of over 5,000 gross tons) which went into effect in January 2018. In June 2022, the European Union revised proposed amendments to these regulations which would effectively impose an Emissions Trading System (“ETS”) on Marine Shipping going through ports or routes under the E.U.’s regulatory jurisdiction. If adopted, these amendments would impose an additional regulatory burden on us to ensure that our vessels meet the revised EU requirements, as well as potential additional costs related to the ETS. The EPA has issued a finding that greenhouse gas emissions endanger the public health and safety and has adopted regulations under the Clean Air Act to limit emissions of greenhouse gases from certain mobile sources and proposed regulations to limit greenhouse gas emissions from large stationary sources, although the mobile source regulations do not apply to greenhouse gas emissions from vessels. Any passage of climate control initiatives by the IMO, the EU or the individual countries in which we operate that limit greenhouse gas emissions from vessels could require us to limit our operations or make significant financial expenditures that we cannot predict with certainty at this time. Passage of climate control initiatives that affect the demand for oil may also materially affect our business. Even in the absence of climate control legislation and regulations, our business may be materially affected to the extent that climate change may result in sea level changes or more intense weather events.

The China Maritime Safety Administration (the “China MSA”) issued the Regulation on Data Collection of Energy Consumption for Ships in November 2018. This regulation is effective as of January 1, 2019 and requires ships calling on Chinese ports to report fuel consumption and transport work details directly to the China MSA. This regulation also contains additional requirements for Chinese-flagged vessels (domestic and international) and other non-Chinese-flagged international navigating vessels. In November 2022, the China MSA published an additional Regulation of Administrative Measures of Ship Energy Consumption Data and Carbon Intensity, which came into effect on December 22, 2022. This regulation was essentially enacted to implement MARPOL Annex VI to Chinese-flagged vessels, though a few of its provisions also apply to foreign ships with a gross tonnage of at least 400 entering and exiting Chinese ports. This Regulation essentially applies more stringent rules around that collection and reporting of data related to ships’ energy consumption, as is already required by the 2018 regulation.

On June 29, 2017, the Global Industry Alliance, or the GIA, was officially inaugurated. The GIA is a program, under the Global Environmental Facility-United Nations Development Program-IMO project, which supports shipping, and related industries, as they move towards a low carbon future. Organizations including, but not limited to, ship owners, operators, classification societies, and oil companies, signed to launch the GIA.

In addition, the United States is currently experiencing changes in its environmental policy, the results of which have yet to be fully determined. Additional legislation or regulation applicable to the operation of our ships that may be implemented in the future could negatively affect our profitability. Furthermore, recent action

94

by the IMO’s Maritime Safety Committee and U.S. agencies indicate that cybersecurity regulations for the maritime industry are likely to be further developed in the near future in an attempt to combat cybersecurity threats, as described below. This might cause companies to cultivate additional procedures for monitoring cybersecurity, which could require additional expenses and/or capital expenditures. However, the impact of such regulations is difficult to predict at this time.

Vessel Security Regulations

Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, there have been a variety of initiatives intended to enhance vessel security. On November 25, 2002, the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002, or MTSA, came into effect in the United States. To implement certain portions of the MTSA, in July 2003, the United States Coast Guard issued regulations requiring the implementation of certain security requirements aboard vessels operating in waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Similarly, in December 2002, amendments to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, or SOLAS, created a new chapter of the convention dealing specifically with maritime security. The chapter went into effect in July 2004, and imposes various detailed security obligations on vessels and port authorities, most of which are contained in the newly created International Ship and Port Facilities Security or, ISPS, Code. Among the various requirements are:

The United States Coast Guard regulation’s aim to align with international maritime security standards exempted non-United States vessels from MTSA vessel security measures provided such vessels have on board, by July 1, 2004, a valid International Ship Security Certificate (“ISSC”) that attests to the vessel’s compliance with SOLAS security requirements and the ISPS Code. We have obtained ISSCs for all of our vessels and implemented the various security measures addressed by the MTSA, SOLAS and the ISPS Codes to ensure that our vessels attain compliance with all applicable security requirements within the prescribed time periods. We do not believe these requirements will have a material financial impact on our operations.

IMO Cyber Security

The Maritime Safety Committee, at its 98th session in June 2017, adopted Resolution MSC.428(98)— Maritime Cyber Risk Management in Safety Management Systems. The resolution encourages administrations to ensure that cyber risks are appropriately addressed in existing safety management systems (as defined in the ISM Code) no later than the first annual verification of the company’s Document of Compliance after January 1, 2021. Owners risk having ships detained if they have not included cyber security in the SMS of ships by January 1, 2021.

Vessel Recycling Regulations

The EU has adopted a regulation that seeks to facilitate the ratification of the IMO Recycling Convention and sets forth rules relating to vessel recycling and management of hazardous materials on vessels. In addition to new requirements for the recycling of vessels, the new regulation contains rules for the control and proper management of hazardous materials on vessels and prohibits or restricts the installation or use of certain hazardous materials on vessels. The new regulation applies to vessels flying the flag of an EU member state and certain of its provisions apply to vessels flying the flag of a third country calling at a port or anchorage of a member state. For example, when calling at a port or anchorage of a member state, a vessel flying the flag of a

95

third country will be required, among other things, to have on board an inventory of hazardous materials that complies with the requirements of the new regulation and the vessel must be able to submit to the relevant authorities of that member state a copy of a statement of compliance issued by the relevant authorities of the country of the vessel’s flag verifying the inventory. The new regulation took effect on non-EU-flagged vessels calling on EU ports of call beginning on December 31, 2020.

Classification and Inspection

All our vessels are certified as being “in class” by a classification society member of the International Association of Classification Societies such as Lloyds Register of Shipping and Bureau Veritas. All new and secondhand vessels that we purchase must be certified prior to their delivery under our standard contracts and memoranda of agreement. If the vessel is not certified on the date of closing, we have no obligation to take delivery of the vessel. Most insurance underwriters make it a condition for insurance coverage that a vessel be certified as “in class” by a classification society that is a member of the International Association of Classification Societies. Every vessel’s hull and machinery is “classed” by a classification society authorized by its country of registry. The classification society certifies that the vessel has been built and maintained in accordance with the rules of such classification society and complies with applicable rules and regulations of the country of registry of the vessel and the international conventions of which that country is a member. Each vessel is inspected by a surveyor of the classification society every year—an annual survey, every two to three years— an intermediate survey, and every four to five years—a special survey. Vessels also may be required, as part of the intermediate survey process, to be dry-docked every 30 to 36 months for inspection of the underwater parts of the vessel and for necessary repairs related to such inspection; alternatively, such requirements may be dealt concurrently with the special survey.

In addition to the classification inspections, many of our customers, including the major charterers regularly inspect our vessels as a pre-condition to chartering voyages on these vessels. We believe that our well-maintained, high quality tonnage should provide us with a competitive advantage in the current environment of increasing regulations, and customer emphasis on quality of service.

All areas subject to surveys as defined by the classification society, are required to be surveyed at least once per class period, unless shorter intervals between surveys are prescribed elsewhere. The period between two subsequent surveys of each area must not exceed five years.

Vessels are dry docked for the special survey for inspection of the underwater parts and for repairs related to inspections. If any defects are found, the classification surveyor will issue a “recommendation” which must be rectified by the ship owner within the prescribed time limits.

Risk of Loss and Liability Insurance

General

The operation of any cargo vessel includes amongst others the handling and management of situations such as mechanical failure and/or physical damage to the ship, collision, third party property loss, cargo loss or damage, business interruption due to political circumstances in foreign countries, hostilities and labor strikes. In addition, there is always an inherent possibility of marine disaster, including environmental mishaps, and the liabilities arising from owning and operating vessels in international trade. While we believe that our present insurance coverage is adequate, not all risks can be insured, and there can be no guarantee that any specific claim will be paid, or that we will always be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates.

We procure hull and machinery insurance, protection and indemnity insurance, which include environmental damage and pollution insurance coverage, war risk and other insurance coverage for our fleet with insurance carriers that also provide insurance coverage for ships owned by affiliated entities, including

96

StealthGas, Imperial Petroleum and private Vafias family interests. Accordingly, if one of our ships, or other ships managed by Brave Maritime or Stealth Maritime and owned by an affiliated entity of Brave Maritime or Stealth Maritime, including StealthGas and Imperial Petroleum, were to incur significant costs from an accident, spill or other environmental liability or were subject to insurance fraud or other incident, our insurance premiums and costs could increase significantly or we may not be able to obtain insurance for our ships.

Hull and Machinery Insurance

We have in place Fleet Marine Hull and Machinery and Fleet War Risk insurance policies, providing cover for particular damage to the vessel, salvage and towage costs following a casualty as well as for vessel Actual or Constructive Total Loss. The vessels are each insured up to at least fair market value, subject to a deductibles of $150,000 per incident.

We also maintain Increased Value insurance. Under the Increased Value insurance, in case of total loss of a vessel, we will be able to recover the sum insured under the Increased Value policy in addition to the sum insured under the Hull and Machinery policy. Increased Value insurance also covers excess liabilities which are not recoverable in full by the Hull and Machinery policies by reason of under insurance.

Protection and Indemnity Insurance

Protection and indemnity insurance, is a form of mutual indemnity insurance, which designed to covers third party liabilities likely to arise out of our shipping activities. It is provided by non-profit-making insurance organizations commonly known as Protection and Indemnity Associations or “P&I Clubs”. This insurance aims to respond towards third-party liability claims and other related expenses arising amongst others from injury or death of crew, passengers and other third parties, loss of or damage to cargoes, claims arising from collisions with other vessels, damage to third-party properties, pollution arising from oil or other substances, salvage costs to the extent that they aim to control or mitigate the environmental effect following a casualty, wreck removal and other discretionary costs.

Our current protection and indemnity insurance provides cover for Oil Pollution up to $1.0 billion per vessel per incident. The 13 P&I Associations that comprise the International Group insure approximately 90% of the world’s commercial tonnage and have entered into a pooling agreement to reinsure each association’s liabilities. Claims pooling between the clubs is regulated by the Pooling Agreement which defines the risks that can be pooled and how losses are to be shared between the participating clubs. The Pool provides a mechanism for sharing all claims in excess of $10 million up to, approximately $3.1 billion.

Under the current structure, clubs’ contributions to claims in the lower pool layer from $10 million to $30 million are assessed on a tripartite formula which takes account of each club’s contributing tonnage, premium and claims record. For claims falling in the upper pool layer from $50 million to $100 million, 7.5% is retained by the club bringing the claim and 92.5% is shared by all on a tonnage-weighted basis.

The International Group clubs arrange a common market reinsurance contract to provide reinsurance for claims which exceed the upper limit of the pool $100 million) up to an amount of $3.1 billion any one claim (US $1 billion for Oil Pollution claims). It is said to be the largest single marine reinsurance contract in the market.

As members of Mutual P&I Associations, we may become subject to unbudgeted supplementary calls payable to the P&I Club depending on its financial year results that they are determined by 3 main parameters, i.e., their exposure from payment of claims, the income through premium and the income arising from investments. Our aim at every renewal is to conclude our P&I insurance with “A rated” P&I clubs as this, amongst other benefits, eliminates the risk of unbudgeted supplementary calls being imposed.

97

Competition

We operate in a highly competitive global market based primarily on supply and demand of vessels and cargoes.

The drybulk sector is characterized by relatively low barriers to entry, and ownership of drybulk vessels is highly fragmented. In general, we compete with other owners of drybulk vessels for charters based upon price, customer relationships, operating expertise, professional reputation and size, age, location and condition of the vessel. We negotiate the terms of our charters (whether voyage charters, period time charters, bareboat charters or pools) based on market conditions. We currently compete primarily with other owners of drybulk vessels, many of which may have more resources than us and may operate vessels that are newer, and therefore more attractive to charterers than vessels we may operate. We currently compete primarily with owners of drybulk vessels in the handymax and handysize class sizes.

Ownership of crude oil tankers capable of transporting crude oil is highly diversified and is divided among many independent tanker owners. Many oil companies and other oil trading companies, the principal charterers of crude oil tankers, also operate their own vessels and transport oil for themselves and third-party charterers in direct competition with independent owners and operators. Competition for charters, including for the transportation of oil and oil products, can be intense and depends on price as well as on the location, size, age, condition, specifications and acceptability of the vessel and its operator to the charterer and is frequently tied to having an available vessel with the appropriate approvals from oil majors. Principal factors that are important to our charterers include the quality and suitability of the vessel, its age, technical sophistication, safety record, compliance with IMO standards and the heightened industry standards that have been set by some energy companies, and the competitiveness of the bid in terms of overall price.

Seasonality

Coal, iron ore and grains, which are the major bulks of the drybulk shipping industry, are somewhat seasonal in nature. The energy markets primarily affect the demand for coal, with increases during hot summer periods when air conditioning and refrigeration require more electricity and towards the end of the calendar year in anticipation of the forthcoming winter period. The demand for iron ore tends to decline in the summer months because many of the major steel users, such as automobile makers, reduce their level of production significantly during the summer holidays. Grain trades are seasonal as they are driven by the harvest within a climate zone. Because three of the five largest grain producers (the United States of America, Canada and the European Union) are located in the northern hemisphere and the other two (Argentina and Australia) are located in the southern hemisphere, harvests occur throughout the year and grains transportation requires drybulk shipping accordingly.

Tanker markets are typically stronger in the winter months as a result of increased oil consumption in the northern hemisphere, but weaker in the summer months as a result of lower oil consumption in the northern hemisphere and refinery maintenance. In addition, unpredictable weather patterns in these months tend to disrupt vessel scheduling and supplies of certain commodities. As a result, our revenues may be stronger in fiscal quarters ended December 31 and March 31 and relatively weaker during the fiscal quarters ended June 30 and September 30.

The Drybulk Shipping Industry

The global drybulk vessel fleet is divided into four principal categories based on a vessel’s carrying capacity. These categories are:

Capesize. Capesize vessels have a carrying capacity of exceeding 100,000 dwt. Only the largest ports around the world possess the infrastructure to accommodate vessels of this size. Capesize vessels are primarily used to transport iron ore or coal and, to a much lesser extent, grains, primarily on long-haul routes.

98

Panamax. Panamax vessels have a carrying capacity of between 60,000 and 100,000 dwt. These vessels are designed to meet the physical restrictions of the Panama Canal locks (hence their name “Panamax” — the largest vessels able to transit the Panama Canal prior to its 2016 expansion, making them more versatile than larger vessels). These vessels carry coal, grains, and, to a lesser extent, minerals such as bauxite/alumina and phosphate rock.

Handymax/Supramax. Handymax vessels have a carrying capacity of between 40,000 and 60,000 dwt. These vessels operate on a large number of geographically dispersed global trade routes, carrying primarily grains and minor bulks. The standard vessels are usually built with 25-30 ton cargo gear, enabling them to discharge cargo where grabs are required (particularly industrial minerals), and to conduct cargo operations in countries and ports with limited infrastructure. This type of vessel offers good trading flexibility and can, therefore, be used in a wide variety of bulk and neobulk trades, such as steel products.

Handysize. Handysize vessels have a carrying capacity of between 28,000 and to 40,000 dwt. These vessels are almost exclusively carry minor bulk cargo. Increasingly, vessels of this type operate on regional trading routes, and may serve as trans-shipment feeders for larger vessels. Handysize vessels are well suited for small ports with length and draft restrictions. Their cargo gear enables them to service ports lacking the infrastructure for cargo loading and discharging.

The supply of drybulk vessels is dependent on the delivery of new vessels and the removal of vessels from the global fleet, either through scrapping or loss. The level of scrapping activity is generally a function of scrapping prices in relation to current and prospective charter market conditions, as well as operating, repair and survey costs.

The demand for drybulk vessel capacity is determined by the underlying demand for commodities transported in drybulk vessels, which in turn is influenced by trends in the global economy. Demand for drybulk vessel capacity is also affected by the operating efficiency of the global fleet, with port congestion, which has been a feature of the market since 2004, absorbing tonnage and therefore leading to a tighter balance between supply and demand. In evaluating demand factors for drybulk vessel capacity, we believe that drybulk vessels can be the most versatile element of the global shipping fleets in terms of employment alternatives.

The Tanker Shipping Industry

In broad terms, demand for oil and oil products traded by sea is primarily affected by global and regional economic conditions, as well as other factors such as changes in the location of productive capacity, and variations in regional prices. Demand for shipping capacity is a product of the physical quantity of the cargo (measured, depending on the cargo in terms of tons or cubic metrics), together with the distance the cargo is carried. Demand cycles move broadly in line with developments in the global economy, with growth rate of demand for products slowing significantly and becoming negative in some years in the period immediately after the onset of the global economic downturn in late 2008, before recovering gradually from 2011 with general improvement in the global macro-economic environment. Low crude prices between 2015 and 2017 induced greater consumption, which led to increased seaborne trade of crude oil as well as refined products. Growth in seaborne trade slowed in 2018 because of inventory drawdown in crude as well as refined products. In 2019, the decline in seaborne trade was on account of lower refinery runs and weaker economic growth. Refineries underwent maintenance in the first half of 2019 to prepare for low sulfur fuel oil and MGO demand related with IMO 2020 regulations on the control of Sulphur emission, while refinery runs were lower in the second half of 2019 due to weaker economic growth.

The outbreak of COVID-19 severely affected the demand for crude oil and refined petroleum products in 2020 and 2021 as several major economies enforced lockdowns to contain the spread of the virus and mitigate the damage caused by the pandemic. The decline in trade was mainly led by a sharp decline in both crude oil and oil products trade following restrictions enforced by authorities in several major economies. In 2022, oil demand

99

and trade improved significantly as Covid-19 restrictions were being eased out and longer haul routes started emerging as a result of the war in Ukraine. Specifically, in 2022, 3,369 million tons of crude oil, products and vegetable oils/chemicals were moved by sea. Of this, crude shipments constituted 1,967 million tons of cargo and products 1,032 million tons, with the balance made up of other bulk liquids, including vegetable oils, chemicals and associated products. Products trades have received a boost in the last decade as a result of developments in exploration and production activity in the U.S. Horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing have triggered a shale oil revolution and rising crude oil production has also ensured the availability of cheaper feedstocks to local refineries. As a result, the U.S. has become a major net exporter of products.

Crude oil is transported in uncoated vessels, which range upwards in size from 55,000 dwt. Products are carried predominantly in coated ships and include commodities such as gas oil, gasoline, jet fuel, kerosene and naphtha (often referred to as ‘clean products’), and fuel oil and vacuum gas oil (often referred to as ‘dirty products’). In addition, some product tankers are also able to carry bulk liquid chemicals and edible oils and fats if they have the appropriate International Maritime Organization (IMO) certification. These vessels are classified as product/chemical tankers, and as such, they represent a swing element in supply, having the ability to move between trades depending on market conditions. Clean petroleum products are therefore carried by non-IMO product tankers and IMO certified product/chemical tankers. IMO tankers will also carry, depending on their tank coatings, a range of other products including organic and inorganic bulk liquid chemicals, vegetable oils and animal fats and special products such as molasses.

Two other important factors are likely to affect product tanker supply in the future. The first is the requirement to retrofit Ballast Water Management Systems (BWTS) to existing vessels. In February 2004, the IMO adopted the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments. The IMO Ballast Water Management (BWM) Convention contains an environmentally protective numeric standard for the treatment of a ship’s ballast water before it is discharged. This standard, detailed in Regulation ‘D-2’ of the BWM Convention, sets out the numbers of organisms allowed in specific volumes of treated discharge water. The IMO ‘D-2’ standard is also the standard that has been adopted by the U.S. Coast Guard’s ballast water regulations and the U.S. EPA’s Vessel General Permit. The BWM Convention also contains an implementation schedule for the installation of IMO member state type approved treatment systems in existing ships and in new vessels, requirements for the development of vessel ballast water management plans, requirements for the safe removal of sediments from ballast tanks, and guidelines for the testing and type approval of ballast water treatment technologies. In July 2017, the IMO extended the regulatory requirement of compliance to the BWM Convention from September 8, 2017 to September 8, 2019. Vessels trading internationally will have to comply with the BWM Convention upon their next special survey after that date. Expenditure of this kind has become another factor impacting the decision to scrap older vessels after BWM Convention came into force in 2019.

The second factor that is likely to impact future vessel supply is the drive to control sulfur emission from ships. Heavy fuel oil (HFO) has been the main fuel of the shipping industry for many years. It is relatively inexpensive and widely available, but it is ‘dirty’ from an environmental point of view. The sulfur content of HFO consumed by ships has been about 3.5% until the end of 2019. It is the reason that maritime shipping accounts for 8% of global emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2), an important source for acid rain, as well as respiratory diseases. In some port cities, such as Hong Kong, shipping is the largest single source of SO2 emissions, as well as emissions of particulate matter (PM), which are directly tied to the sulfur content of the fuel. One estimate suggests that PM emissions from maritime shipping led to 87,000 premature deaths worldwide in 2012.

Vessel chartering

Product tankers and crude oil tankers are ordinarily chartered either through a voyage charter or a time charter, under a longer term contract of affreightment (“COA”) or in pools. Under a voyage charter, the owner agrees to provide a vessel for the transport of cargo between specific ports in return for the payment of an agreed

100

freight rate per ton of cargo or an agreed dollar lump sum amount. Voyage costs, such as canal and port charges and bunker expenses, are the responsibility of the owner. Under a time charter, the ship owner places the vessel at the disposal of a charterer for a given period of time in return for a specified rate (either hire per day or a specified rate per dwt capacity per month) with the voyage costs being the responsibility of the charterer. In both voyage charters and time charters, operating costs (such as repairs and maintenance, crew wages and insurance premiums), as well as drydockings and special surveys, are the responsibility of the ship owner. The duration of time charters varies, depending on the evaluation of market trends by the ship owner and by charterers. Occasionally, tankers are chartered on a bareboat basis. Under a bareboat charter, operations of the vessels and all operating costs are the responsibility of the charterer, while the owner only pays the financing costs of the vessel. A COA is another type of charter relationship where a charterer and a ship owner enter into a written agreement pursuant to which a specific cargo will be carried over a specified period of time. COAs benefit charterers by providing them with fixed transport costs for a commodity over an identified period of time. COAs benefit ship owners by offering ascertainable revenue over that same period of time and eliminating the uncertainty that would otherwise be caused by the volatility of the charter market. A shipping pool is a collection of similar vessel types under various ownerships, placed under the care of a single commercial manager. The manager markets the vessels as a single fleet and collects the earnings which are distributed to individual owners under a pre-arranged weighing system by which each participating vessel receives its share. Pools have the size and scope to combine voyage charters, time charters and COA with freight forward agreements for hedging purposes, to perform more efficient vessel scheduling thereby increasing fleet utilization.

Market cyclicality and trends

The international tanker shipping industry is cyclical and volatile, having reached historical highs in 2008 and historical lows in 2016. Charter rates improved in the first half of 2020; before declining sharply in the second half of 2020 and remaining at low levels in 2021 and early 2022, before significantly improving in the second half of 2022 and the first quarter of 2023. Tanker charter hire rates and vessel values for all tankers are influenced by the supply-demand dynamics of the tanker market. Demand for vessels depends on the international trade of oil and refined petroleum products, including the availability of crude oil. Also, in general terms, time charter rates are less volatile than spot rates as they reflect the fact that the vessel is fixed for a longer period of time. In the spot market, rates will reflect the immediate underlying conditions in vessel supply and demand, and are thus prone to more volatility.

At the same time, the supply of tankers vessels cannot be changed drastically in the short term as it takes about nine months to build a ship and, usually, there is a lag of, at least, fifteen to eighteen months between placing an order to build a vessel and its delivery. In the near term, supply is limited by the existing number of vessels and can only be adjusted by increasing or decreasing the operating speed of a vessel but various economic and operational factors could limit the range of such adjustments.

Typically, periods of high charter rates result in an increased rate of new vessel ordering, often more than what the demand levels warrant; these vessels begin to be delivered eighteen months or more later when demand growth for vessels may have slowed down thus creating oversupply and quick correction of charter rates. The cyclicality of charter rates is also reflected in vessel values.

Drybulk Charter Hire Rates Charter hire rates fluctuate by varying degrees among drybulk vessel size categories. The volume and pattern of trade in a small number of commodities (major bulks) affect demand for larger vessels. Therefore, charter rates and vessel values of larger vessels often show greater volatility. Conversely, trade in a greater number of commodities (minor bulks) drives demand for smaller drybulk vessels. Accordingly, charter rates and vessel values for those vessels are subject to less volatility.

Charter hire rates paid for drybulk vessels are primarily a function of the underlying balance between vessel supply and demand, although at times other factors may play a role. Furthermore, the pattern seen in charter rates is broadly mirrored across the different charter types and the different drybulk vessel categories. However,

101

because demand for larger drybulk vessels is affected by the volume and pattern of trade in a relatively small number of commodities, charter hire rates (and vessel values) of larger ships tend to be more volatile than those for smaller vessels.

In the time charter market, rates vary depending on the length of the charter period and vessel specific factors such as age, speed and fuel consumption.

In the voyage charter market, rates are influenced by cargo size, commodity, port dues and canal transit fees, as well as commencement and termination regions. In general, a larger cargo size is quoted at a lower rate per ton than a smaller cargo size. Routes with costly ports or canals generally command higher rates than routes with low port dues and no canals to transit. Voyages with a load port within a region that includes ports where vessels usually discharge cargo or a discharge port within a region with ports where vessels load cargo also are generally quoted at lower rates, because such voyages generally increase vessel utilization by reducing the unloaded portion (or ballast leg) that is included in the calculation of the return charter to a loading area.

Within the drybulk shipping industry, the charter hire rate references most likely to be monitored are the freight rate indexes issued by the Baltic Exchange. These references are based on actual charter hire rates under charters entered into by market participants as well as daily assessments provided to the Baltic Exchange by a panel of major shipbrokers.

Legal Proceedings

To our knowledge, there are no material legal proceedings to which we are a party or to which any of our properties are subject, other than routine litigation incidental to our business. In our opinion, the disposition of these lawsuits should not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

See Note 10 “Commitments and Contingencies” to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of C3is Inc. included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Properties

Other than our vessels, we do not own any material property. Brave Maritime provides office space to us without charge and will continue to do so until one year from the completion of the Spin-Off, and thereafter the lease rate will be €5,000 per month.

102

MANAGEMENT

Directors and Senior Management

The following sets forth the name and position of each of our directors and executive officers. The business address for each director and executive officer is the address of our principal executive office which is located at 331 Kifissias Avenue, Erithrea 14561, Athens, Greece.

Certain biographical information about each of these individuals is set forth below.

Harry N. Vafias is Non-executive Chairman of the Board of our company. He has also been Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer and President of Imperial Petroleum Inc., which is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, since its inception in May 2021 and the President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of StealthGas Inc., which is listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, since its inception in December 2004 and its Chief Financial Officer since January 2014. Mr. Vafias has been actively involved in the drybulk, tanker and gas shipping industry since 1999. Mr. Vafias worked at Seascope, a leading ship brokering firm specializing in sale and purchase of vessels and chartering of oil tankers. Mr. Vafias also worked at Braemar, a leading ship brokering firm, where he gained extensive experience in tanker and dry cargo chartering. Seascope and Braemar merged in 2001 to form Braemar Seascope Group plc, a public company quoted on the London Stock Exchange and one of the world’s largest ship brokering and shipping service groups. From 2000 until 2004, he worked at Stealth Maritime and Brave Maritime, companies providing comprehensive ship management services, where Mr. Vafias headed the operations and chartering departments of Brave Maritime and served as manager for the sale and purchase departments of both Stealth Maritime and Brave Maritime. Mr. Vafias graduated from City University Business School in the City of London in 1999 with a B.A. in Management Science and from Metropolitan University in 2000 with a Masters degree in Shipping, Trade and Transport.

Dr. Diamantis Andriotis has been our Chief Executive Officer, President and a member of the Board of Directors of our company since its inception in July 2022. Since 2008, Dr. Andriotis has worked for Stealth Maritime Corporation SA, where he holds the position of the Chief Executive Officer, and since 2014 he has been the Chief Technical Officer of StealthGas Inc. He has actively participated in the design of several new ships towards improved efficiency, reduced environmental footprint and maximizing operability as well as compliance with chartering requirements. Working for Vafias family companies he has contributed to the expansion of the fleet having gained extensive experience in every aspect of ship management. Dr. Andriotis studied Mechanical Engineering at City University, London. His Doctorate degree, under sponsorship by the world’s largest marine engine manufacturer, MAN B&W, involved experimental and numerical investigations of Diesel Engine fuel systems. During and after his PhD he performed research at City University for various companies including Caterpillar (USA) and participated to various projects like the DTi project for the design of radically low emission diesel fuels. Dr. Andriotis is an active member of the committees of the leading classification societies as well as other shipping industry organizations.

103

John Kostoyannis has served on our Board of Directors since June 2023. He has also been a member of the Board of Directors of Imperial Petroleum since 2021 and StealthGas since 2010. Mr. Kostoyannis is a Managing Director at Allied Shipbroking Inc., a leading shipbroking house in Greece, providing Sale and Purchase and Chartering services in the shipping industry. Before joining Allied Shipbroking, from 1991 until September 2001, Mr. Kostoyannis worked in several prominent shipbroking houses in London and Piraeus. He is a member of the Hellenic Shipbrokers Association. Mr. Kostoyannis graduated from the City of London Polytechnic in 1988 where he studied Shipping and Economics.

George Xiradakis has served on our Board of Directors since 2023. He has also been a member of the Board of Directors of Imperial Petroleum since 2021. Mr. Xiradakis is the founder and Managing Director of XRTC Business Consultants Ltd. (“XRTC”) (January 1999). The company was established in order to represent financial institutions in the Greek territory and initially acted as the exclusive Shipping Representative of Credit Lyonnais Group in Greece. XRTC expanded its scope as Financial and Advisor Consultant for Greek Shipping, offering its services in national and International Institutions and Organizations. From February 2005 to 2008, XRTC acted as shipping finance consultant of the French banking group NATIXIS. He is also the General Secretary of the Association of Banking and Financial Executives of Hellenic Shipping, Vice President of China Hellenic Chamber (HCCI), Vice President (International and Financial Relations) of the China-Greece Association. He served as the President of the International Propeller Club, Port of Piraeus from 2013 to 2019 and he acted as a VP of the International Propeller Club of the United States. He is now Emeritus President of International Propeller Club, Port of Piraeus, Emeritus Member of The Piraeus Chamber of Commerce & Industry, Member of the Mediterranean Committee of China Classification Society, Piraeus Marine Club, Hellenic Maritime Museum and Hellas Liberty Floating Museum. He has also been a Board Member of other US listed shipping companies.

Nina Pyndiah is our Chief Financial Officer. She has served as our Chief Financial Officer since the completion of the Spin-Off. Ms. Pyndiah is a Certified Internal Auditor (CIA), with over 30 years’ experience in private, public and industry practices in London and Athens. Her areas of expertise include Internal Audit, External Audit, Financial Controller, Internal Controls over Financial Reporting (ICFR), Accounting and Investigations. She has been the Internal Auditor of StealthGas Inc. since 2006. Ms. Pyndiah is a member of the Institute of Internal Auditors.

Our officers and the other individuals providing services to us or our subsidiaries may face a conflict regarding the allocation of their time between our business and the other business interests of Imperial Petroleum or its affiliates. The amount of time our officers and such other individuals providing services to us will allocate between our business and the business of Imperial Petroleum and its affiliates will vary from time to time depending on various circumstances and needs of the businesses, such as the level of strategic activity of each business. While there are no formal requirements or guidelines for the allocation of time spent between our business and the other businesses they are involved in, the performance of their duties are subject to the ongoing oversight of our board of directors.

Board of Directors

We have four members on our board of directors. The board of directors may change the number of directors to not less than three, nor more than 12, by a vote of a majority of the entire board. Each director shall be elected to serve until the third succeeding annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor shall have been duly elected and qualified, except in the event of death, resignation or removal. A vacancy on the board created by death, resignation, removal (which may only be for cause), or failure of the stockholders to elect the entire class of directors to be elected at any election of directors or for any other reason, may be filled only by an affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors then in office, even if less than a quorum, at any special meeting called for that purpose or at any regular meeting of the board of directors. The current term of our Class I director expires in 2024, the term of our Class II director expires in 2025 and the term of our Class III directors expires in 2026.

104

We are a “foreign private issuer” under the securities laws of the United States and the rules of the Nasdaq Capital Market. Under the securities laws of the United States, “foreign private issuers” are subject to different disclosure requirements than U.S. domiciled registrants, as well as different financial reporting requirements. Under the Nasdaq Capital Market rules, a “foreign private issuer” is subject to less stringent corporate governance requirements. Subject to certain exceptions, the rules of the Nasdaq Capital Market permit a “foreign private issuer” to follow its home country practice in lieu of the listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market. As permitted by these exemptions, as well as by our bylaws and the laws of the Marshall Islands, we currently intend to have an audit committee composed solely of two independent committee members, whereas a domestic U.S. public company would be required to have three such independent members and a board of directors composed of two independent and two non-independent directors, whereas a domestic U.S. public company would be required to have a majority of independent members. In addition, in lieu of obtaining shareholder approval prior to the issuance of designated securities, the Company will comply with provisions of the Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act, providing that the Board of Directors approves share issuances.

Committees of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors has established an Audit Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a Compensation Committee. The members of the Audit Committee are George Xiradakis (Chairman), and John Kostoyannis. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consists of John Kostoyannis (Chairman) and George Xiradakis. The Compensation Committee consists of George Xiradakis (Chairman) and John Kostoyannis. Each of the directors on the Audit Committee has been determined by our Board of Directors to be independent.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is governed by a written charter, which is approved and annually adopted by the Board. The Board has determined that the members of the Audit Committee meet the applicable independence requirements of the SEC and the Nasdaq Stock Market, that all members of the Audit Committee fulfill the requirement of being financially literate and that George Xiradakis is an Audit Committee financial expert as defined under current SEC regulations.

The Audit Committee is appointed by the Board and is responsible for, among other matters overseeing the: