Proposal No. 1 - Election of Directors (page 21)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Board Engagement | | Nominee Average Age |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 5 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Relevant Skills and Experience | |
The nominees possess a balance of leadership experiences, diverse perspectives, strategic skill sets and professional expertise that are essential in furthering our business strategy and objectives, including: | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Retail Industry | | | | | | | | Business Transformation | | | | |
| | | | | 6 | | | | | | | | | | | | 8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Marketing & Customer Experience | | | | | CEO Experience | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 8 | | | | | | | 5 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Online Scale & Growth | | | | | | | Financial Expertise | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 8 | | | | | | | | | | 8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Risk & Crisis Management | | | | | | Technology Expertise | | | | | |
| | | | | 6 | | | | | | | | 4 | | | | | |
The Board recommends a vote FOR each Director nominee.
Proposal No. 2 - Ratification of Independent Accountants (page 29)
Qualified and Experienced Independent Auditors
•Deloitte is an independent registered accounting firm that has served Nordstrom for more than 50 years.
•The firm’s expertise and fees are appropriate for the scope of the Company’s needs.
The Board recommends a vote FOR this proposal.
Proposal No. 3 - Advisory Vote Regarding Executive Compensation (page 59)
Compensation Aligned with Performance
•Our executive compensation program aligns with our strategy and our pay-for-performance philosophy.
•We deliver the majority of compensation through a pay-for-performance framework where incentives are based on achieving results. Approximately 85% of our CEO’s fiscal 2021 target compensation was variable or linked to our financial or market results.
•Our Incentive Adjusted EBIT achievement exceeded our target of $612 million and Incentive Adjusted ROIC exceeded the threshold of 5.5%, resulting in a 128% bonus payout.
•PSUs for the 2019 - 2021 fiscal year performance cycle did not meet the minimum thresholds for Free Cash Flow Growth and EBIT Margin % required for payout. As a result, none of these PSUs vested.
Fiscal Year 2021 Target Compensation
| | | | | |
CEO and President & Chief Brand Officer | Average of all Other NEOs |
| |
| |
85% | 75% |
Performance Based | Performance Based |
The Board recommends a vote FOR this proposal.
INDEX OF KEY TERMS
| | | | | |
Term | Definition |
2021 Annual Report | Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2022 |
| |
| |
2025 Corporate Social Responsibility Goals | Review our 2025 Corporate Social Responsibility goals at nordstromcares.com |
AFC | Audit and Finance Committee of the Board of Directors |
ASC 718 | Accounting Standards Codification 718, Stock Compensation |
Board | The Board of Directors |
Broadridge | Broadridge Investor Communication Services |
CD&A | Compensation Discussion & Analysis |
CAO | Chief Accounting Officer |
CEO | Chief Executive Officer |
CFO | Chief Financial Officer |
CGNC | Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors |
Chairman | Our Board Chairman, a non-Executive position |
Common Stock | Nordstrom common stock |
CPCC | Compensation, People and Culture Committee of the Board of Directors |
DDCP | Nordstrom Directors Deferred Compensation Plan |
Deloitte | Deloitte & Touche LLP |
Diversity, Inclusion and Belonging Goals | Review our Diversity, Inclusion and Belonging goals at nordstrom.com/diversity |
EBIT | Earnings (Loss) Before Interest and Taxes |
EIP | Equity Incentive Plan |
EMBP | Executive Management Bonus Plan |
ERG | Employee Resource Group |
ESG | Environmental, Social and Governance |
ESPP | Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
Exchange Act | Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
FASB | Financial Accounting Standards Board |
GAAP | U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles |
Incentive Adjusted EBIT | Incentive Adjusted Earnings (Loss) Before Interest and Income Tax Expense |
Incentive Adjusted ROIC | Incentive Adjusted Return on Invested Capital |
Investor Relations Website | Our investor relations website, found at investor.nordstrom.com |
IRC | Internal Revenue Code |
Lease Standard | Accounting Standards Update 2018-11, Leases |
LTI | Long-Term Incentives |
NDCP | Nordstrom Deferred Compensation Plan |
NEO | Named Executive Officer |
Notice | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders |
NYSE | New York Stock Exchange |
PEO | Principal Executive Officer |
Plan Trustee | Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee of the Nordstrom 401(k) Plan |
PSU | Performance Share Unit |
Record Date | March 9, 2022 |
| |
RSU | Restricted Stock Unit |
SEC | Securities and Exchange Commission |
Semler Brossy | Semler Brossy Consulting Group, LLC |
SERP | Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan |
TC | Technology Committee of the Board of Directors |
TSR | Total Shareholder Return |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 7 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
[This page intentionally left blank.]
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 9 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Our Corporate Governance Framework
Since its founding, our Company’s leaders and employees have always sought to maintain the highest ethical standards in every aspect of our business. Our corporate governance framework is designed to support this tradition of integrity, trust and unyielding commitment to doing the right thing, which has served our customers and shareholders well over the years. Our corporate governance framework, more fully discussed on the following pages, includes the following highlights:
Board Responsibilities, Leadership Structure, and Role in Risk Oversight
The Board oversees, counsels and directs management in promoting the long-term interests of the Company and our shareholders. The Board’s responsibilities include:
•determining the appropriate structure for the senior leadership of the Company;
•selecting and evaluating the performance of the CEO and President and Chief Brand Officer;
•planning for succession with respect to the position of the CEO and monitoring management’s succession planning for other senior executives;
•reviewing and approving our major financial objectives, our strategic and operational plans and other significant actions;
•monitoring the conduct of our business and the assessment of our business risks to promote the proper management of the business;
•overseeing the management of cybersecurity, including oversight of appropriate risk mitigation strategies, systems, processes and controls; and
•overseeing the processes for maintaining integrity with regard to our financial statements and other public disclosures, and compliance with laws and our Codes of Business Conduct and Ethics.
At this time, the Board believes different people should hold the positions of Chairman and CEO, as this may strengthen corporate governance and aid in the Board’s oversight of management. Currently, Brad Smith serves as Chairman and Erik Nordstrom serves as the CEO. The CEO is responsible for day-to-day leadership and performance of the Company, while the Chairman provides guidance to the CEO and presides over the full Board. The Board believes this leadership structure also aids in the Board’s oversight and management of risk.
The full Board has primary responsibility for oversight of risk management and has assigned to the Board’s standing Committees the task of focusing on the specific risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight. The full Board:
•considers and determines the Company’s risk appetite, which is the amount of risk the organization is willing to accept;
•oversees management’s implementation of an appropriate system to manage risks (i.e., to identify, assess, mitigate, monitor and communicate these risks) and monitors the effectiveness of this process as the business environment changes;
•provides risk oversight through the Board’s committee structure and processes; and
•directly manages certain risks, in particular, the risks associated with the Company’s strategic direction, which are reviewed at an annual strategy planning meeting and periodically throughout the year.
The Company has a comprehensive, structured approach to managing risks, which are identified, assessed, prioritized and managed at all levels within the Company through an enterprise risk management process which is aligned with the Company’s strategy. Within this framework, management is responsible for assessing and managing the Company’s exposure to risks. Management regularly reports on risks to the relevant Committee or the Board. The Board and its Committees discuss the various risks confronting the Company throughout the year, particularly when reviewing operating and strategic plans and when considering specific actions for approval. The risks are classified into four major categories: Strategic, Compliance, Operational and Financial, and are mapped for appropriate management and Board (and Committee) oversight.
Through the risk oversight process, the Board:
•obtains an understanding of the risks inherent in the Company’s strategy and management’s execution of the strategy within the agreed risk appetite;
•accesses useful information from internal and external sources about the critical assumptions underlying the strategy;
•is alert for possible dysfunctional behavior within the organization which might lead to excessive risk taking;
•provides input to executive management regarding critical risk issues on a timely basis; and
•encourages open communication and appropriate escalation of reporting of risk throughout the enterprise, striving to ensure that risk management is part of the corporate culture.
The Board’s leadership structure and the collective knowledge and experience of its members promotes a broad perspective, open dialogue and useful insights regarding risk, thereby increasing the effectiveness of the Board’s role in risk oversight.
Board Oversight of ESG Issues
The Board views effective oversight and management of ESG issues and their associated risks as vital to the Company’s ability to execute its business strategy and achieve sustainable long-term growth. The Board coordinates with its Committees to provide active Board and Committee level oversight of the Company’s ESG risks. Specifically:
| | |
Our Board views effective oversight and management of ESG issues as vital to the Company’s long-term growth. |
•The Board oversees ESG risks as part of its oversight of the Company’s business, strategy and enterprise risk management. As part of this oversight, the Board and its Committees receive regular reports on ESG-related matters, including but not limited to updates on the Company’s progress towards its sustainability and corporate social responsibility goals, status updates on the Company’s Diversity, Inclusion and Belonging Goals, reports on any ESG-related engagements with shareholders, and information on recent ESG developments, so that the Board can ensure that any material ESG risks and opportunities are appropriately integrated into the Company’s long-term strategy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 11 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
•The CGNC is charged with direct responsibility for oversight of risks relating to corporate governance, shareholder engagement, corporate social responsibility and sustainability. The work of the CGNC reflects the Company’s commitment to improving the sustainability of our operations and supply chains, including finding ways to continue to reduce our carbon emissions, reduce waste through innovative programs like BEAUTYCYCLE and increase the number of sustainably sourced products we make available to our customers. The CGNC also has oversight over Board effectiveness, including identifying and recruiting Board members with the appropriate skills and experience, including experience with ESG initiatives, to lead our Company into the future.
•The CPCC oversees risks that impact our employees, including training, development, benefits, employee health and wellness, and diversity, inclusion, and belonging. The CPCC has been integral in allowing the Company to quickly adapt to the ever-evolving challenges presented by the pandemic, including overseeing our efforts to offer employees flexible work models, new wellness and mental health resources and to ensure our frontline employees feel supported with the safest possible work environments, all of which have allowed our employees to focus on serving the needs of our customers.
To learn more about our ESG initiatives, please refer to our most recent corporate social responsibility report and other information available on our website at nordstrom.com/browse/nordstrom-cares.
Director Independence
A Director is considered independent when our Board affirmatively determines the Director has no material relationship with the Company, other than as a Director. Our Board makes this determination in accordance with the standards set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are consistent with the listing standards of the NYSE and SEC rules. In making this determination, the Board considers existing relationships between the Company and the Director, whether directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company. The Board has affirmatively determined that each of the Director nominees, except Erik Nordstrom and Peter Nordstrom, is independent within the meaning of the listing standards of the NYSE, SEC rules and the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Chairman of the Board and Presiding Director
The Company has a Chairman of the Board who is also an independent Director and who serves as the Presiding Director within the meaning of the listing standards of the NYSE. Currently, Brad D. Smith serves as the Company’s Chairman. Brad D. Smith is not seeking re-election and will be retiring from the Board at the end of his current term in May 2022, at which point the Board will appoint a new Chairman.
The Chairman is appointed annually by the Board. As described in the Company’s Bylaws, Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charter of the CGNC, the Chairman:
•presides at meetings of the Board;
•assists in establishing the agenda for each Board and Board Committee meeting;
•serves as the Presiding Director to lead executive sessions at each meeting of the Board in which only independent Directors participate;
•calls special meetings of the Board and/or the shareholders;
•provides input and support to the Chair of the CGNC on nominees to fill vacant Board seats and the selection of Committee Chairs and membership on Board Committees;
•advises the CEO and other members of the executive team on such matters as strategic direction, corporate governance and overall risk assessment; and
•performs such other duties as the Board may from time to time delegate to assist the Board in the fulfillment of its responsibilities.
Director Elections
The Company’s Bylaws provide that, in an uncontested election, a Director nominee will be elected if the number of votes cast for the nominee’s election exceeds the number of votes cast against the nominee’s election. An incumbent Director nominee who fails to receive the requisite votes for election will continue to serve as a Director until the earlier of: (i) 90 days from the date on which the voting results of the election are determined; or (ii) the date on which an individual is selected by the Board to fill the position held by such Director. In any election which is a contested election (meaning that the number of Director nominees exceeds the number of Directors to be elected), the standard for election of Directors is a plurality of the votes cast by holders of shares entitled to vote in the election at a meeting.
Management Succession Planning
The Board and management believe that one of their primary responsibilities is to ensure the Company has the appropriate leadership to effectively deliver upon its business commitments. The Company’s management is actively engaged and involved in leadership development, having regular discussions of the leadership capabilities of the organization and the attraction, development and retention of critical talent to promote future success. In addition to the Company’s regular review of leadership capabilities, the Board annually conducts a detailed review of the talent strategies for the entire organization and reviews succession plans for senior leadership positions, including that of the CEO. The Board reviews high-potential employees, evaluates plans to develop their management and
leadership capabilities and sanctions the strategies used to deploy these individuals most effectively. In addition to the annual review, succession is regularly discussed in executive sessions of the Board and in Board Committee meetings, as applicable. Directors become familiar with potential successors for key leadership positions through various means, including the comprehensive annual talent and succession review, Board meeting presentations and less formal interactions throughout the course of the year.
Our entire Board is responsible for implementing succession procedures for the CEO. We believe the Board, led by our Chairman, should collaborate with the CEO on the critical aspects of the succession planning process, including establishing selection criteria, identifying and evaluating candidates and making management succession decisions. The Board has procedures in place to respond to an unexpected vacancy in the CEO position, including a detailed review of the succession plan annually by the Board. It is the Board’s practice to be prepared for a planned or unplanned change in leadership in order to ensure the stability of the Company.
Board Committees and Charters
The Board has four standing Committees: Audit and Finance (“AFC”); Compensation, People and Culture (“CPCC”); Corporate Governance and Nominating (“CGNC”); and Technology (“TC”). Each Committee has a Board-approved charter which is reviewed annually by the respective Committee. Recommended changes to the charter, if any, are submitted to the CGNC and the Board for approval. The Board makes Committee and Committee Chair assignments annually at the Board meeting held in tandem with the Annual Meeting, although further changes to Committee assignments may be made from time to time as deemed appropriate by the Board. The Board has determined that the Chairs and all Committee members are independent under the applicable NYSE rules. Committee charters and current Committee membership are posted on our Investor Relations Website.
In addition to the responsibilities described below and on the following pages, the Board and its Committees also have oversight over ESG issues. For additional information on how risk oversight over ESG issues is allocated between the Board and its Committees, please see Board Oversight of ESG Issues beginning on page 11.
| | |
Audit and Finance Committee |
As more fully described in its charter, the primary responsibilities of the AFC are to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility by:
•reviewing the Company’s financial statements and ensuring the integrity of those statements;
•evaluating the accounting, auditing and financial reporting processes of the Company;
•managing business and financial risk and the internal controls environment;
•assessing the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and ethics programs as established by management and the Board, in conjunction with any recommendations by the CGNC with respect to corporate governance standards; and
•reviewing the reports resulting from the performance of audits by the independent auditor and the internal audit team.
In addition, the AFC provides financial oversight by:
•evaluating the qualifications, independence and performance of the Company’s independent auditors;
•assessing performance of the Company’s internal audit team;
•advising on the Company’s capital structure, financial policies, capital investments, business and financial planning and related matters;
•reviewing the Company’s tax strategies and the implications of actual or proposed tax law changes;
•overseeing the Company’s dividend payment and share repurchase strategies, banking relationships, borrowing facilities and cash management; and
•monitoring the Company’s compliance with covenants under its outstanding indebtedness and borrowing facilities.
| | | | | |
| The Audit and Finance Committee provides financial oversight of the Company's management, internal audit function and independent auditors. |
The AFC regularly reviews cybersecurity matters, enterprise risk management, compliance with laws and regulations, and audit results for corporate social responsibility metrics. The AFC also meets privately and separately with the independent registered public accounting firm, the CFO and the Vice President, Internal Audit.
In addition to meeting the independence requirement for audit committee members, the Board has determined that each current member of the AFC also meets the financial literacy and experience requirements contained in the corporate governance listing standards of the NYSE. While the members of the AFC are not professionally engaged in the practice of auditing or accounting and are not technical experts in auditing or accounting, the Board has determined that all AFC members qualify as “audit committee financial experts” under the regulations of the SEC.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 13 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
| | |
Compensation, People and Culture Committee |
As more fully described in its charter, the primary responsibilities of the CPCC are to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility by:
•developing the overall compensation philosophy for the Company’s Executive Officers in light of the Company’s goals and objectives. The Executive Officers are referenced on pages 30 and 31 and include the NEOs shown in the CD&A on page 32 and other business unit presidents and Company executives with responsibility for major organizational functions who report to the CEO or other senior executives;
•selecting performance measures aligned with the Company’s business strategy;
•administering the Company’s cash and equity-based compensation plans for executives;
•performing the annual review of the overall performance of the CEO and President and Chief Brand Officer;
| | |
|
Our Compensation, People and Culture Committee oversees our strategies and goals relating to the development of our employees throughout the organization. |
|
•administering benefit plans, retirement and deferred compensation or other perquisites offered to the Executive Officers and other eligible employees;
•assessing risk relating to compensation; and
•overseeing key talent initiatives such as diversity, inclusion and belonging.
The CPCC has the sole authority to retain such consultants and advisors as it may deem appropriate and to approve related fees and other retention terms. The CPCC has retained Semler Brossy, an independent compensation consulting firm, to advise the CPCC on executive compensation and benefit matters. Semler Brossy provides services only as directed by the CPCC. During fiscal year 2021, Semler Brossy’s services included a review of executive and Director pay programs, a review of the compensation peer group, and other pay-related matters specific to the CPCC’s charter. With respect to Director pay, Semler Brossy provides its services to the CGNC. The CPCC has determined that Semler Brossy is independent under the rules of the NYSE and that its work for the CPCC does not raise any conflict of interest.
A consultant from Semler Brossy attends CPCC meetings and supports the CPCC by providing independent expertise on market practices and trends in executive compensation within the general industry and the peer group defined for such purposes. Additionally, the consultant provides advice regarding the composition of the Company’s peer group and analysis of peer group practices for base salary, performance-based bonus, LTIs and other compensation elements, and advice on management’s proposed levels of executive compensation. Semler Brossy also advises the CPCC on compensation program design, including incentive structure, stock ownership guidelines, regulatory requirements related to executive compensation, plans submitted to shareholders for approval, governance responsibilities, and such other matters as assigned by the CPCC from time to time as necessary to carry out its responsibilities under its charter.
| | |
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee |
As more fully described in its charter, the primary responsibilities of the CGNC are to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility by:
•evaluating potential nominees for election to the Board and determining the composition of Board Committees;
| | |
|
Our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee regularly reviews best practices to ensure the proper functioning of the Board and its Committees. |
|
•evaluating possible conflicts of interest of Board members and the Company’s Executive Officers;
•approving the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines;
•establishing the corporate governance standards contained in the Company’s Codes of Business Conduct and Ethics;
•advising on policies and practices of the Company in the area of corporate governance;
•evaluating and recommending to the Board the form and amount of Director compensation;
•performing the annual performance evaluation of the Board, the Directors and each Committee of the Board; and
•overseeing succession procedures to be followed in the case of an emergency or the retirement of the CEO.
As more fully described in its charter, the primary responsibilities of the TC are to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility by:
| | |
Our Technology Committee meets quarterly to oversee risks related to cybersecurity, technology, and data governance. |
•advising on the Company’s technology strategy;
•overseeing the Company’s technology acquisition and development process to ensure ongoing business growth;
•evaluating the Company’s data management and automation processes and measurement and tracking systems;
•reviewing the Company’s technology risk management, including but not limited to the Company’s policies and safeguards for information technology, cybersecurity, data security and privacy, as well as risks and incidents with respect to information technology and data security; and
•overseeing material technology investments.
With the oversight of the TC:
•the Company’s information security program has been assessed by a third-party advisor three of the last four years to evaluate team maturity and to evaluate any improvements or opportunities; and
•the Company delivers information security and privacy awareness training annually, with additional technical security training provided to engineers, and also performs quarterly phishing exercises and security awareness campaigns.
The TC also regularly reviews any information technology and data security incidents as a standing agenda item each time the TC meets.
Board Meetings and Attendance
The Board held six formal meetings during fiscal year 2021, one of which was devoted principally to Company strategy. During the past fiscal year, the AFC held nine formal meetings, the CPCC held four formal meetings, the CGNC held six formal meetings, and the TC held four formal meetings. Each Director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of all formal meetings of the Board and the Committees on which they served during the year, and overall attendance at formal meetings, on a combined basis, was 97%. Independent members of the Board met at each formal meeting of the Board in executive session without management present. Directors are expected to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, if practicable. All Directors attended the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 15 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
Director Compensation and Stock Ownership Guidelines
The Company’s pay-for-performance philosophy for Director compensation reflects the Board’s belief that payment of a majority of the Director fees in the form of Common Stock aligns the interests of Directors with the interests of the Company’s shareholders and enhances Director compensation when the Company performs well. The Board believes the Director fees paid by the Company should be competitive with other companies having similar characteristics. Employee Directors of the Company are not paid any fees for serving as members of the Board. Non-employee Director compensation is discussed below and on the following page.
| | | | | |
Annual Compensation Elements for 2021 | Amount ($)* |
Director Retainer | 85,000 | |
AFC Chair Retainer | 30,000 | |
CPCC Chair Retainer | 20,000 | |
CGNC Chair Retainer | 15,000 | |
TC Chair Retainer | 15,000 | |
Director Equity Grant of Common Stock having a grant date value of | 150,000 | |
Chairman of the Board Equity Grant of Common Stock having a grant date value of | 200,000 | |
* Directors may elect to take some or all of their cash retainer fees in Common Stock.
| | |
|
Our Directors are required to hold stock having a value of at least $450,000, in excess of 5x the annual Board retainer, by their fifth anniversary of joining the Board. |
|
Under the Director Stock Ownership Guidelines, Directors are currently required to own Common Stock having a value of at least $450,000, in excess of five times the annual Director cash retainer, by their fifth anniversary of joining the Board. As of the Record Date, each nominee for election at the Annual Meeting had either satisfied this obligation or had time remaining to do so. Under the Company’s policy, a Director is deemed to be in compliance with the Stock Ownership Guidelines once their holdings of Common Stock meet or exceed the threshold, and will remain in compliance, notwithstanding any decline in the value of Common Stock, unless and until the Director sells shares.
No changes were made to Director Compensation for fiscal year 2022.
| | |
Director Summary Compensation Table |
During the fiscal year ended January 29, 2022, non-employee Directors of the Company received the following compensation for their services: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(a)(b) | Stock Awards ($)(b)(c) | All Other Compensation ($)(d) | Total ($) |
Shellye L. Archambeau | 100,000 | | 149,994 | | 2,049 | | 252,043 |
Stacy Brown-Philpot | 100,000 | | 149,994 | | 8,545 | | 258,539 |
Tanya L. Domier* | — | | — | | 18,175 | | 18,175 |
James L. Donald | 85,000 | | 149,994 | | 9,924 | | 244,918 |
Kirsten A. Green | 85,000 | | 149,994 | | 581 | | 235,575 |
Glenda G. McNeal | 85,000 | | 149,994 | | 27,052 | | 262,046 |
Brad D. Smith | 85,000 | | 349,997 | | 6,110 | | 441,107 |
Bradley D. Tilden | 115,000 | | 149,994 | | 4,934 | | 269,928 |
Mark J. Tritton | 105,000 | | 149,994 | | 12,282 | | 267,276 |
* Tanya Domier retired from the Board at the end of her term in May 2021 and did not receive director fees during the fiscal year ended January 29, 2022.
(a) Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
The amounts reported reflect the cash fees paid to each non-employee Director, whether or not such fees were deferred. Shellye Archambeau received $15,000 in cash for service as Chair of the CGNC. Stacy Brown-Philpot received $15,000 in cash for service as Chair of the TC. Bradley Tilden received $30,000 in cash for service as Chair of the AFC. Mark Tritton received $20,000 in cash for service as Chair of the CPCC.
(b) Deferred Compensation Program
Non-employee Directors may elect to defer all or a part of their cash retainers and stock awards under the DDCP. Directors are required to make advance elections to defer the receipt of fees or stock awards, and all deferral elections generally are irrevocable. Directors are also required to make advance elections about the form and timing of distribution of their deferred cash fees or stock awards.
In 2021, cash deferrals could be directed among 9 deemed investment alternatives and gains and losses for cash deferrals were posted to the Director’s account daily based on their investment elections. In addition, plan participants were offered a fixed rate option of 4.31% in 2021, which was not subsidized by the Company, but rather was a rate based on guaranteed contractual returns from a third-party insurance company provider. Deferred stock awards are credited to the Director’s account as units. Each unit in the DDCP is equal in value to the price of one share of Common Stock. Each deferred unit is credited with dividends, in the form of additional units, to the same extent as a share of Common Stock.
During the fiscal year which ended January 29, 2022, Ms. Brown-Philpot deferred 100% of her stock award into the DDCP.
(c) Stock Awards
The amounts reported reflect the grant date fair value associated with each Director’s stock awards. Fractional shares are not awarded or paid in cash. In recognition of the significant time and attention in performing the duties required of the position, our Chairman of the Board is annually awarded, on the first open trading day following the Annual Meeting, an additional stock award having a grant date fair value of $200,000.
(d) All Other Compensation
All Directors, their spouses and eligible children may participate in the Company’s employee merchandise discount program. The program provides a discount of 33% for purchases at Nordstrom stores, Nordstrom.com, Trunk Club and TrunkClub.com and 20% for purchases at Nordstrom Rack stores, NordstromRack.com and our restaurants. A 40% discount is available at certain times of the year on specific merchandise. The merchandise discount provided to the Directors is the same as for all other eligible management and high-performing non-management employees. During the fiscal year ended January 29, 2022, All Other Compensation consisted only of merchandise discounts for all Directors.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Compensation, People and Culture Committee Report The CPCC has reviewed and discussed with management the CD&A included in this Proxy Statement. The CPCC believes the CD&A represents the intent and actions of the CPCC with regard to executive compensation and has recommended to the Board that it be included in this Proxy Statement for filing with the SEC. | |
| Compensation, People and Culture Committee | | |
| | | | | |
| Mark J. Tritton, Chair | Glenda G. McNeal | Brad D. Smith | | |
| | | | | |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Table of Contents
This section describes our executive compensation program and the compensation decisions made for our fiscal year 2021 NEOs.
| | | | | | | | |
Erik B. Nordstrom | | Chief Executive Officer |
Anne L. Bramman | | Chief Financial Officer |
Peter E. Nordstrom | | President and Chief Brand Officer |
Kenneth J. Worzel | | Chief Customer Officer |
Edmond Mesrobian | | Chief Technology Officer |
We made progress this year on our strategic initiatives and met our 2021 financial targets, giving us line of sight to achieving our February 2021 Investor Event targets in the near term. We continue to work with urgency to build additional capabilities to better serve customers, expand market share and deliver greater profitability.
We ended the year laser focused on three key areas: improving Nordstrom Rack performance, increasing profitability and optimizing our supply chain and inventory flow.
We also continue to make progress in the key strategic growth priorities we laid out at our Investor Event: winning in our most important markets, broadening the reach of Nordstrom Rack and increasing our digital velocity.
Winning in our most important markets: We continue to scale the enhanced options we launched in 2020, like the expansion of order pickup and ship-to-store to all Nordstrom Rack stores. Additionally, one-third of fourth quarter next-day Nordstrom.com demand was picked up at Nordstrom Rack stores, demonstrating the power of integrating capabilities across our two brands and across our digital and physical platforms.
Broadening the reach of Nordstrom Rack: As we improve our supply of premium brands and fine tune our assortment to better align with customer needs, we expect to achieve a better balance of price points at Nordstrom Rack. Through this set of actions, as well as strengthening Nordstrom Rack brand awareness and driving traffic, we seek to drive continued improvement in Nordstrom Rack performance throughout 2022.
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Increasing our digital velocity: We maintained strong growth at Nordstrom.com and NordstromRack.com in 2021, with digital sales increasing 24% compared with 2019. With continued growth in digital, our total penetration has increased by 10 percentage points over the past two years to 42% in 2021. In the fourth quarter, we also saw record high mobile app usage, with mobile users representing approximately 70% of total digital traffic.
Though we still have work to do on our transformation, the progress we have made gives us confidence in our strategic plans and business outlook for 2022. We believe there is a meaningful opportunity ahead for us to better serve customers by improving Nordstrom Rack performance and transforming our supply chain, leading to increased profitability and shareholder value creation. We have line of sight to achieving the financial targets outlined at our Investor Event while building the capabilities to profitably grow market share beyond that.
Shareholders Support our Compensation Program
Our shareholders approved our Board’s recommendation to hold executive compensation advisory votes on an annual basis so that they may frequently and openly express their views about the compensation of our NEOs. Each year since 2011, more than 90% of the votes cast have been supportive of our compensation programs. The CPCC took investors’ sustained support into account as it continued to implement similar compensation policies and programs in fiscal year 2021.
We Emphasize Variable Pay and Balance Short- and Long-Term Incentive Values
In accordance with our pay-for-performance philosophy, the compensation program for our NEOs is straightforward in design and includes four primary elements: base salary, performance-based bonus, LTIs and benefits. Within these pay elements, we emphasize variable pay over fixed pay, with at least 70% of each NEO’s target compensation linked to our financial or market results. The program also balances the importance of these executives achieving both critical short-term objectives and strategic long-term priorities. The following graphics represent fiscal year 2021 target direct compensation (excluding benefits) for the CEO and the President and Chief Brand Officer and for the other NEOs.
| | | | | |
CEO and President & Chief Brand Officer | Average of All Other NEOs |
| |
| |
85% | 75% |
Performance Based | Performance Based |
Our Variable Pay Reflects Company Performance
Our pay-for-performance design includes rigorous performance goals and high performance standards. Further, with a substantial portion of pay in the form of Common Stock, pay outcomes align with our shareholders’ interests. This is evidenced by our NEOs’ recent incentive compensation payouts and actual and grant realizable values as of our 2021 fiscal year-end, as shown in the tables on the following page.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 33 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2021 |
FINANCIAL RESULTS | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Earnings (Loss) | | $437 | M | | $564 | M | | $496 | M | | ($690 | M) | | $178 | M |
EBIT | | $926 | M | | $837 | M | | $784 | M | | ($1,047 | M) | | $492 | M |
Return on Assets | | 5.4 | % | | 6.8 | % | | 5.1 | % | | (7.1 | %) | | 1.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PAYOUTS | | | | | | | | | | |
Incentive Adjusted EBIT(a) | | $952 | M | | $909 | M | | $808 | M | | ($1,047 | M) | | $666 | M |
Incentive Adjusted ROIC | | 10.0 | % | | 12.8 | % | | 11.2 | % | | (8.5 | %) | | 7.0 | % |
Annual bonus payout as a % of Target on Incentive Adjusted EBIT measure(b) | | 96 | % | | 89 | % | | 44 | % | | 0 | % | | 128 | % |
3-year TSR percentile ranking within the S&P 500(c) | | 10%ile | | 24%ile | | 20%ile | | N/A | | N/A |
PSU vesting (payout as a % of Target) | | 0 | % | | 0 | % | | 0 | % | | N/A (d) | | 0 | % |
(a) In fiscal year 2021, our Incentive Adjusted EBIT measure excluded certain performance-based compensation elements in order to be more reflective of business performance.
(b) For the CEO and the President and Chief Brand Officer, actual bonus payouts as a percent of target for fiscal years 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021 were 94%, 63%, 47%, 0% and 128%, respectively.
(c) 2019 PSU grant results are based on internal measures.
(d) No PSU performance cycles ended in fiscal year 2020.
Incentive Adjusted EBIT and Incentive Adjusted ROIC are not measures of financial performance under GAAP and should be considered in addition to, and not a substitute for, return on assets, net earnings, total assets or other GAAP financial measures. See Appendix A for a reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. In fiscal year 2021, our Incentive Adjusted EBIT measure excluded certain performance-based compensation elements in order to be more reflective of business performance.
PSU vesting as shown in the table above corresponds to the performance periods ending in fiscal years 2017 through 2021. Three-year TSR percentile ranking is based on our relative TSR performance over three-year rolling periods between fiscal years 2015 and 2019 versus the S&P 500, with the exception of the 2019 PSU grant. For the 2019 PSU grant, we changed our performance measure from relative TSR to internal measures, structured with two performance periods. Two-thirds of the PSUs granted in 2019 had a three-year performance period which ended January 29, 2022. At the end of the performance cycle, our Free Cash Flow Growth and EBIT Margin % did not meet the minimum thresholds, required for payout. As a result, none of these PSUs vested. One-third of the PSUs granted in 2019 had a one-year performance period which ended February 1, 2020. As disclosed in our 2020 Proxy Statement, none of these PSUs vested as our Free Cash Flow Growth and EBIT Margin % did not meet the minimum thresholds required for payout.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
GRANT REALIZABLE VALUES | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2021 |
PSUs (realizable value as a % of grant value) | | 0 | % | | N/A | | 0 | % | | N/A | | N/A |
RSUs (realizable value as a % of grant value) | | 93 | % | | 64 | % | | 71 | % | | 112 | % | | 66 | % |
Stock options (realizable value as a % of grant value) | | 5 | % | | N/A | | 0 | % | | 95 | % | | 0 | % |
Realizable values, reflected above, are based on the actual values at time of vest and current unvested values using our 2021 fiscal year end stock price of $21.85, shown as a percent of grant value. PSUs, RSUs and stock options are shown in the column matching the year of grant.
The PSUs granted on March 9, 2020 were cancelled on August 18, 2020, as discussed on page 43, and are not reflected in the above table.
The CPCC reviews these results and other analyses with the goal of ensuring that the NEOs’ aggregate compensation aligns with shareholder interests. Based on these and other outcomes, the CPCC believes that total direct compensation for our NEOs reflects our pay-for-performance philosophy and is well aligned with shareholder interests.
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Effective Corporate Governance Reinforces Our Compensation Program
Our compensation philosophy for our executive team, including our NEOs, is reflected in governance practices that support the needs of our business, drive performance and align with our shareholders’ long-term interests. Below is a summary of what we do and don’t do in that regard.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
WHAT WE DO | | WHAT WE DON’T DO |
ü | Pay for performance: Our compensation program for NEOs emphasizes variable pay over fixed pay, with at least 70% of each NEO’s target compensation linked to our financial or market results. | | | Provide employment agreements. |
ü | Retain meaningful stock ownership guidelines: Our expectations for ownership align executives’ interests with those of our shareholders, and all NEOs have exceeded their targets. | | | Offer separation benefits to NEOs who are Nordstrom family members. |
ü | Mitigate undue risk: We have caps on potential performance-based bonus payments, a clawback policy on performance-based compensation and active and engaged oversight and risk management systems, including those related to compensation-related risk. | | | Offer special perquisites to our NEOs. |
| | | Maintain separate change in control agreements. |
ü | Engage an independent compensation consulting firm: The CPCC’s consultant does not provide any other services to the Company. | | | Gross up taxes, except in the case of selected relocation expenses. |
ü | Apply conservative post-employment and change in control provisions. | | | Reprice underwater stock options. |
ü | Limit accelerated vesting: Our equity plan provides for accelerated vesting of equity awards after a change in control only if an executive is involuntarily terminated by the Company or resigns for good reason, a provision referred to as a “double trigger.” | | | Issue grants below 100% fair market value. |
| | | Pay dividends on any unearned or unvested equity awards. |
ü | Restrict pledging activity: All Executive Officers are subject to pre-clearance requirements and restrictions. | | | Permit hedging or short-sale transactions. |
ü | Receive strong shareholder support: Each year since 2011, more than 90% of the votes cast have been supportive of our compensation programs. | | | Count pledged shares toward stock ownership targets. |
| | |
Framework for Executive Compensation |
Our Pay and Benefits Philosophy
•We believe that if our customers win, our employees and shareholders win – our interests are aligned.
•We pay for performance by investing in talent that delivers results and demonstrates the behaviors that drive our success, while not encouraging excessive risk taking.
•We deliver competitive pay and benefits for all jobs and differentiate pay for critical jobs that directly impact our ability to deliver on our strategy.
•We use objective market data to design flexible pay and benefits programs to help attract, retain, motivate and reward our employees and meet the needs of specific talent groups.
•We provide equal pay and promotion opportunities for all employees and give them the information they need to clearly understand their pay and effectively manage their careers.
Each Element of Compensation Has Its Own Purpose
Our compensation program for NEOs is made up of four primary elements outlined on the following table. Each element has its own purpose based on our fundamental premise of pay for performance and our pay and benefits philosophy, described above. Additional information is provided on the following pages.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 35 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
| | | | | | | | |
Compensation Element | | Purpose |
Base Salary (Page 36) | | Reflect scope of the role and individual performance through base-line cash compensation. |
Performance-Based Annual Cash Bonus (Page 37) | | Motivate and reward contributions to annual operating performance and long-term business strategy with cash that varies based on results. |
LTIs (Pages 38-39) | | Promote alignment of executive decisions with Company goals and shareholder interests where value varies with Company stock performance. |
Benefits (Page 39) | | Provide meaningful and competitive broad-based, leadership and retirement benefits that support healthy lifestyles and contribute to financial security. |
Pay Changes for 2021
On an annual basis, the CPCC reviews base salary, performance-based bonus target opportunity and LTI target grant value for each of the NEOs in consideration of the upcoming fiscal year. Committee decisions for fiscal year 2021 are summarized below and shown as a year over year comparison.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Base Salary ($) | | Performance-Based Annual Cash Bonus (Target Opportunity as a % of Base Salary) | | LTI Annual Grant (Target Grant Value as a % of Base Salary) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | | FYE 2020 | | FYE 2021 | | FYE 2020 | | FYE 2021 | | FYE 2020 | | FYE 2021 |
Erik B. Nordstrom | | 758,500 | | | 758,500 | | | 200 | | | 200 | | | 350 | | | 350 | |
Anne L. Bramman | | 800,000 | | | 815,000 | | | 100 | | | 100 | | | 200 | | | 200 | |
Peter E. Nordstrom | | 758,500 | | | 758,500 | | | 200 | | | 200 | | | 350 | | | 350 | |
Kenneth J. Worzel | | 875,000 | | | 895,000 | | | 125 | | | 125 | | | 250 | | | 250 | |
Edmond Mesrobian | | 775,000 | | | 800,000 | | | 80 | | | 80 | | | 150 | | | 150 | |
In 2021, the CPCC approved modest increases to base salary for Anne Bramman, Kenneth Worzel and Edmond Mesrobian, as shown above, to maintain their relative market competitiveness. These increases were effective March 28, 2021. Erik Nordstrom and Peter Nordstrom’s base salaries remained unchanged.
In addition, the CPCC made no changes to target bonus opportunities or to target LTI grant values for any of the NEOs.
LTI annual grant in the table above reflects target grant value as a percent of base salary. The CPCC retains discretion to approve grants above and below targets in any given year to reflect an individual’s contributions to delivering shareholder value. In 2021, the CPCC used its discretion to increase the LTI annual grant for the NEOs to recognize the criticality of their roles in continuing to deliver on strategic objectives that position the company for future growth.
•Erik Nordstrom’s LTI annual grant was 488% of base salary to recognize his critical role in delivering results to shareholders over the next few years. The increase in Erik Nordstrom’s LTI grant value continues to result in competitive pay positioning below median of CEO roles within our peer group.
•Peter Nordstrom’s LTI annual grant was 488% of base salary, to recognize the importance of his role in transforming our merchandising capabilities, optimizing inventory flow and expanding our supplier partnership models.
•Anne Bramman’s LTI annual grant was 275% of base salary to recognize her role in ensuring the long-term sustainability of the organization and leading critical initiatives to maintain our financial disciplines.
•Kenneth Worzel’s LTI annual grant was 275% of base salary to recognize his leadership on our growing local market strategy and on the ongoing integration of customer touchpoints that will deliver key customer outcomes and capture market share.
•Edmond Mesrobian’s LTI annual grant was 300% of base salary to recognize his role in delivering significant technology innovation that will be critical to the achievement of our business strategy in years to come.
Base Salary
The CPCC begins its annual review of base salary for the NEOs through discussion with the CEO and the President and Chief Brand Officer on the expectations and achievements of each executive during the previous year, as well as their pay history and pay equity with other internal roles. The CPCC then references similar roles in peer companies to ensure they are within a competitive range of the peer group median. NEOs do not necessarily receive increases in base salary every year. When they do, the changes are effective on or about April 1st following their annual performance review, which includes a discussion about individual results against defined expectations.
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Performance-Based Annual Cash Bonus
The opportunity for annual performance-based cash awards under our shareholder-approved Nordstrom, Inc. EMBP is designed to focus the NEOs on the alignment between annual operating performance and long-term business strategy.
In determining the target bonus opportunities, the CPCC takes into account the mix of pay elements, market pay information for similar roles within our peer group and the internal relationship between roles within the Company.
In support of our pay-for-performance philosophy, the maximum bonus payout, which is associated with superior performance, is 2.5 times an executive’s target bonus opportunity. This maximum is higher than is common among our retail peers because we believe it is important to continue encouraging and paying rewards when we achieve truly superior results. Under our approach, truly superior results are rarely achieved. In the past 10 years, we have not paid out bonuses in excess of 150% of target.
The following table shows the measures, weighting and opportunity for individual differentiation for the bonus opportunity for the CEO and President and Chief Brand Officer, and for the other NEOs for fiscal year 2021. The CPCC maintained the same financial performance measures of Incentive Adjusted EBIT, which emphasizes the importance of earnings and its role in driving shareholder value, and Incentive Adjusted ROIC, which ensures our overall performance aligns directly with shareholder returns over the long term.
In 2021, the bonus opportunity for the NEOs, excluding the CEO and President and Chief Brand Officer, was modified to place even greater emphasis on delivering profitable results by eliminating individual performance as a separate weighted metric. The CPCC retained the ability to differentiate payouts based on individual contributions and execution against goals. Any individual bonus differentiation is applied after the calculation of outcomes on the financial performance measures described below.
| | | | | | | | |
| Measure and Weighting | Opportunity for Individual Bonus Differentiation |
| |
CEO and President and Chief Brand Officer | 100% Incentive Adjusted EBIT subject to achievement of the Incentive Adjusted ROIC threshold | No |
Other NEOs | 100% Incentive Adjusted EBIT subject to achievement of the Incentive Adjusted ROIC threshold | Yes |
The CPCC defines financial milestones for Incentive Adjusted ROIC (as a threshold) and Incentive Adjusted EBIT (as a range) that relate to varying percentages of bonus payout. The difficulty level in achieving the milestones reflects the CPCC’s belief that there should be a balance between executive pay opportunity, reinvestment in the Company and return to shareholders.
In accordance with our EMBP, Incentive Adjusted EBIT and Incentive Adjusted ROIC achievement used to determine bonus payout may differ from EBIT and ROIC, as reported in our 2021 Annual Report, due to the exclusion of certain one-time gains or losses. In fiscal year 2021, our Incentive Adjusted EBIT measure excluded certain performance-based compensation elements in order to be more reflective of business performance. Incentive Adjusted EBIT and Incentive Adjusted ROIC are not measures of financial performance under GAAP and should be considered in addition to, and not a substitute for, return on assets, net earnings, total assets or other financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. See Appendix A for a reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures.
2021 Bonus Measure Outcomes and Payouts
Our Incentive Adjusted EBIT achievement exceeded the threshold milestone of $612 million and Incentive Adjusted ROIC exceeded the threshold of 5.5%, resulting in a 128% payout. In fiscal year 2021, our Incentive Adjusted EBIT measure excluded certain performance-based compensation elements in order to be more reflective of business performance.
The bonus payouts for Anne Bramman, Kenneth Worzel and Edmond Mesrobian were not differentiated for individual performance. Each individual’s performance against strategic priorities was evaluated by the CEO and the President and Chief Brand Officer and the payout results were approved by the CPCC.
The performance-based annual cash bonus results are summarized in the following table.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Milestones | |
Name | Bonus Measures | Threshold | Target | Superior | Actual |
All NEOs | Incentive Adjusted EBIT | $375 | M | $612 | M | $900 | M | $666M |
% of Payout | 25 | % | 100 | % | 250 | % | 128 | % |
Subject to Incentive Adjusted ROIC threshold | 5.5% | 7.0 | % |
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 37 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
LTIs
Annual grants of LTI under our shareholder-approved EIP are intended to provide the NEOs with additional incentive to create shareholder value and receive financial rewards. In establishing the LTI annual grant value for each NEO, the CPCC considers the mix of pay elements, market pay information for similar roles within our peer group, our annual share usage and dilution, performance and internal equity of grant size by role. The CPCC typically approves LTI annual grants during the February CPCC meeting, which is scheduled at least a year in advance. The February meeting occurs after performance results for the prior year are known, which allows the CPCC to align compensation elements with our performance and business goals.
Due to the challenges of setting goals for PSUs in a highly variable environment, the CPCC approved changes in both the mix and vesting of LTI grants for the NEOs for fiscal year 2021.
•Erik Nordstrom and Peter Nordstrom’s target LTI mix changed from 40% stock options and 60% PSUs to 100% price-vested stock options. Stock option vesting changed from 25% each year over four years to 50% on March 10, 2024 and 50% on March 10, 2025, to account for the elimination of PSUs, which typically had a three-year cliff vest, and to emphasize the long-term nature of the award. Vesting is subject to the condition that the average daily closing price of our Common Stock meets or exceeds $45 per share for any twenty consecutive trading day period prior to March 10, 2025. For reference, our average closing price in fiscal year 2019 (pre-COVID) was $37.
•Anne Bramman, Kenneth Worzel and Edmond Mesrobian’s target LTI mix changed from 40% RSUs and 60% PSUs to 60% RSUs and 40% stock options. The CPCC made no change to RSU vesting, which vest 25% each year over four years. Stock option vesting changed from 25% each year over four years to 50% on March 10, 2024 and 50% on March 10, 2025, to account for the elimination of PSUs, which typically had a three-year cliff vest, and to emphasize the long-term nature of the award.
2019 PSUs Did Not Pay Out
Two-thirds of the PSUs granted in 2019 had a three-year performance period which ended January 29, 2022. At the end of the performance cycle, our Free Cash Flow Growth and EBIT Margin % did not meet the minimum thresholds, as shown below, required for payout. As a result, none of these PSUs vested. One-third of the PSUs granted in 2019 had a one-year performance period which ended February 1, 2020. As disclosed in our 2020 Proxy Statement, none of these PSUs vested as our Free Cash Flow Growth and EBIT Margin % did not meet the minimum thresholds required for payout.
| | | | | | | | |
Performance Measures for Performance Period: February 3, 2019 – January 29, 2022 |
Free Cash Flow Growth | EBIT Margin % | Percentage of Units that will Vest |
≥31.4% | ≥7.1% | 200% |
28.9% | 6.8% | 100% |
26.3% | 6.5% | 50% |
<26.3% | <6.5% | 0% |
Stock Ownership Guidelines Align Executives and Shareholders
Ownership of Common Stock by our NEOs and other Executive Officers is encouraged by management and the Board, and our stock ownership guidelines were formally established in 2004. Ownership shares are made up of all forms of Common Stock, as well as vested PSUs that are deferred and unvested RSUs. Ownership shares do not include unvested or vested stock options, unvested PSUs or pledged shares.
The NEOs and other Executive Officers have an annual share target defined as base salary on each April 1st multiplied by their ownership multiple of base salary divided by a 52-week average closing stock price. The ownership multiples of base salary depend on the executive’s role in the Company and are as shown in the following table for the NEOs. The CPCC has assigned these particular multiples to match or exceed market practice, and to represent a significant portion of the overall compensation package to reinforce the alignment of management’s decision-making with shareholder interests. Executives will be deemed to be in compliance with the Stock Ownership Guidelines once their holdings of Common Stock meet or exceed the threshold, and will remain in compliance, notwithstanding any decline in the value of Common Stock, unless and until the executive sells shares. However, a new target will be determined at the time an executive receives a promotion that results in an increased multiple of base salary or in the case of a one-time base salary increase greater than 20%, at which point the executive will have five years to achieve the new target.
| | | | | |
Position | Multiple of Base Salary Used to Establish Ownership Target |
Chief Executive Officer | 10x |
Chief Financial Officer | 4x |
President and Chief Brand Officer | 10x |
Chief Customer Officer | 4x |
Chief Technology Officer | 3x |
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Under our guidelines, NEOs and other Executive Officers are required to conduct any open market transactions in Common Stock only in accordance with an SEC Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. These plans predetermine the timing, number of shares and price at which an Executive Officer may buy or sell Company shares. The Executive Officers must also achieve and retain a minimum holding of 100% of their ownership targets before they may sell or otherwise dispose of Company shares.
The CPCC regularly reviews stock ownership status for the NEOs. All of the NEOs have exceeded their ownership targets.
Benefits
The Company offers the NEOs a comprehensive program of broad-based, leadership and retirement benefits. Their purpose varies by benefit, but in general they enhance total compensation with meaningful and competitive offerings that support healthy lifestyles and contribute to financial security. These benefits are regularly reviewed for consistency with our pay and benefits philosophy, organizational culture and market practices.
Additional information on 2021 benefits is provided in the table below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Benefit | | Where to Learn More |
Broad- Based | ● | Company contribution to medical, dental and vision coverage; short- and long-term disability; life insurance; adoption assistance; and employee referral assistance. Employee access to accident insurance; health savings account and flexible spending accounts; ESPP and merchandise discount. Paid time off (or Self-Managed Time Away for executives) | ● | For merchandise discount, see All Other Compensation in Fiscal Year 2021, footnote (a) on page 44. |
Leadership | ● | Long-term disability coverage; life insurance | ● | For long-term disability and life insurance, see All Other Compensation in Fiscal Year 2021, footnote (c) on page 45. |
| ● | NDCP; including Company match for eligible participants | ● | See Nonqualified Deferred Compensation beginning on page 52. |
| ● | Executive Severance Plan | ● | See Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control at Fiscal Year-End 2021, footnote (e) on pages 57 and 58. |
Retirement | ●
| 401(k) match; Company matching contributions are made each pay period an employee contributes to the 401(k) Plan, equal to a dollar for dollar match up to 1% of eligible pay then $0.50 per dollar on the next 6% of eligible pay, up to a maximum of 4% of eligible pay and IRC limits | ● | See All Other Compensation in Fiscal Year 2021, footnote (b) on page 45. |
● | Retiree health care (closed to new entrants in 2013; Erik Nordstrom, Peter Nordstrom and Kenneth Worzel are participants as they were eligible prior to the closure to new entrants) | ● | See Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control at Fiscal Year-End 2021, footnote (d) on page 57. |
● | SERP (annual benefit capped for current participants; closed to new entrants in 2012; Erik Nordstrom, Peter Nordstrom and Kenneth Worzel are participants as they were eligible prior to the closure to new entrants) | ● | See Pension Benefits beginning on page 51. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 39 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Changes for 2022
Each year, the CPCC reviews the design of our total compensation elements and makes changes as needed to improve alignment with our pay and benefits philosophy. At the February 2022 meeting, the CPCC approved the following changes for fiscal year 2022:
Base Salary
Anne Bramman’s base salary was increased by 4% effective March 27, 2022, to maintain her relative market competitiveness. The base salaries of all other NEOs remained unchanged.
Performance-Based Annual Cash Bonus
The CPCC determined that the target bonus opportunity as a percent of base salary for the NEOs will remain unchanged for 2022.
LTIs
•Performance-based equity was reintroduced into the LTI annual grant mix. The 2022 target annual grant mix for all NEOs was changed to 60% PSUs and 40% stock options. The PSUs will pay out based on the cumulative sales and EBIT margin % over a three-year performance period. Goals for the PSUs are aligned with the Company’s forward-looking strategy communicated at the February 2021 Investor Event. The CPCC believes that these measures reflect the Company’s key areas of strategic focus over the next three years. The minimum percentage of PSUs that can be earned at the end of the three-year performance cycle is 75% and the maximum is 150%. To emphasize the long-term nature of the award, the stock options will continue to vest 50% at the end of year 3 and 50% at the end of year 4.
•Anne Bramman’s target LTI grant value as a percent of base salary increased from 200% to 250% to maintain her relative market competitiveness for the Chief Financial Officer role. The target LTI grant as a percent of base salary of all other NEOs remained unchanged. The CPCC did not use its discretion to modify any NEO target LTI grants for 2022.
Our Roles in Determining Compensation Are Well-Defined
Compensation, People and Culture Committee
Our CPCC oversees the development and delivery of our pay and benefits philosophy and compensation plans for the NEOs and other executives as described in the CPCC charter on our Investor Relations Website.
As part of that oversight, the CPCC ensures the NEOs’ aggregate compensation aligns with shareholder interests by reviewing analyses that include:
•Cash alignment to evaluate the short-term incentive payouts relative to our financial performance.
•Relative pay and performance to compare the percentile rankings of our total direct compensation (base salary + performance-based bonus + LTIs) with financial performance metrics of our peer group.
CPCC Consultant
The CPCC has retained Semler Brossy. A consultant from the firm attends CPCC meetings and in support of the CPCC’s role, provides independent expertise on market practices, compensation program design and related subjects as described on page 14. Semler Brossy provides services only as directed by the CPCC. During fiscal year 2021, Semler Brossy’s services included a review of executive and Director pay programs, a review of the compensation peer group, and other pay-related matters specific to the CPCC’s charter. With respect to Director pay, Semler Brossy provides its services to the CGNC.
Management
Our CEO and the President and Chief Brand Officer provide input to the CPCC on the level and design of compensation elements for the NEOs and other Executive Officers, excluding themselves. Our Chief Human Resources Officer attends CPCC meetings to provide perspective and expertise relevant to the agenda. Management supports the CPCC’s activity by providing analyses and recommendations developed internally, or occasionally, with the assistance of external consulting firms other than the CPCC’s independent consultant.
Market Data Provides a Reference Point for Compensation
The CPCC believes that knowledge of market practices, particularly those of our peers listed on the following page, is helpful in assessing the design and targeted level of our executive compensation package. In reviewing peer group information, the CPCC uses survey data provided by external consultants, monitors general market movement for executive pay and references proxy statements for specific roles.
While the CPCC considers the 50th percentile (median) of our peer group as a reference, there is no specific percentage of target total direct compensation targeted by the CPCC other than to remain generally competitive with similarly situated peer companies. Target opportunities for individual pay elements vary by executive role based on scope of responsibilities and expected contributions.
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Target total direct compensation for 2021 for Erik Nordstrom and Peter Nordstrom was below our peer group median, as it has been in previous years. Based on the CPCC’s review of relevant market data and internal pay equity, the CPCC believes the target total direct compensation for Anne Bramman, Kenneth Worzel and Edmond Mesrobian was within a competitive range of the peer group median. Actual pay for the NEOs can exceed our established targets or peer group actual pay through the variable compensation elements when pre-determined performance milestones established by the CPCC are achieved.
Peer Group Companies Represent Our Business
Each year, the CPCC reviews the appropriateness of our peer group for comparison on pay and related practices. Collectively, the peer group companies represent our primary business areas, including our Nordstrom, Nordstrom Rack, in-store and online businesses and private label products. The peer group companies generally meet the following selection criteria:
•fall within the Consumer Discretionary and Staples sectors;
•fall within a reasonable range of our size, defined as one-fourth to four times our revenue and one-fifth to five times our market capitalization;
•share similar talent, operational and/or business characteristics, including a retail-focused business model;
•have a similar or related product focus and place a high value on customer experience;
•are part of our industry group as defined by institutional shareholders and shareholder service organizations; and
•are a public company subject to similar market pressures.
Our peer group used for evaluating compensation for fiscal year 2021 was comprised of the following retail companies:
| | | | | | | | |
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. | Kohl’s Corporation | Tapestry, Inc. |
Capri Holdings Limited | Bath & Body Works, Inc.* | The TJX Companies, Inc. |
Dillard’s, Inc. | Macy’s, Inc. | Urban Outfitters, Inc. |
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. | Ralph Lauren Corporation | V.F. Corporation |
Foot Locker, Inc. | Ross Stores, Inc. | Williams-Sonoma, Inc. |
The Gap, Inc. | | |
*In July 2021, L Brands announced separation of the Victoria’s Secret business into an independent, publicly traded company and made a name change from L Brands, Inc. to Bath & Body Works, Inc.
During 2021, as part of its annual review of peer companies to be used for compensation comparison purposes, the CPCC determined that J.C. Penney Company, Inc. and Tiffany & Co. should be removed due to the unavailability of publicly disclosed pay data going forward.
Compensation Risk Assessment Supports Integrity of Our Pay Practices
The CPCC oversees an extensive review of the Company’s pay-for-performance philosophy, the composition and balance of elements in the compensation package and the alignment of plans with shareholder interests to ensure these practices do not pose a material adverse risk to the organization. The review is conducted every other year as underlying programs and practices are generally consistent over time. The last review, for fiscal year 2020, concluded with the following perspectives:
•The goals of the Company’s compensation programs are to attract and retain the best talent and to motivate and reward our people in ways that are aligned with the long-term interests of our shareholders. This has been a long-standing objective of our pay-for-performance philosophy. We believe that the strong alignment of our employee compensation plans with performance has well-served our stakeholders, and our shareholders in particular. The strength of this alignment is regularly reviewed and monitored by the CPCC.
•We have systems in place to identify, monitor and control risks, making it difficult for a single individual or a group of individuals to expose the Company to material compensation risk.
•Our compensation program rewards both short- and long-term performance. Performance measures for Company leaders are predominantly team-oriented rather than individually focused and tied to measurable factors that are both transparent to shareholders and drivers of their shareholder return.
•The compensation program balances the importance of achieving critical short-term objectives with a focus on realizing strategic long-term priorities. Strong stock ownership guidelines are in place for Company leaders, and mechanisms, such as an executive clawback policy, exist to address inappropriate rewards.
•The CPCC is actively engaged in establishing compensation plans, monitoring these plans during the year and using discretion in making rewards, as necessary.
•The Company has active and engaged oversight systems in place. The AFC and the full Board closely monitor and certify the performance that drives employee rewards through detailed and transparent financial reporting, which is in place to provide strong, timely insight into the performance of the Company.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 41 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Based on this review, the CPCC believes the Company’s compensation plans do not encourage risk taking that is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Executive Compensation Clawback Policy Applies to Performance-Based Pay
In February 2008, the Board adopted a formal executive compensation clawback policy that applies to any performance-based bonus, equity, equity equivalent or other incentive compensation awarded to an Executive Officer, beginning in that fiscal year. Under that policy, in the event of a material restatement of the Company’s financial results, the Board will review the circumstances that caused the restatement and consider accountability to determine whether an Executive Officer was negligent or engaged in misconduct. If so, and if the amount or vesting of an award would have been less had the financial statements been correct, the Board will seek to recover compensation from the Executive Officer as it deems appropriate. This policy is in addition to any requirements which might be imposed pursuant to applicable law.
LTI Grants Are Effective On the First Day of the Open Trading Window
The CPCC approves annual equity-based awards at its annual February meeting, which is typically held approximately three weeks after fiscal year end. Annual grants are customarily effective on the first day of the Company’s next open trading window following CPCC approval. The CPCC may approve one-time equity-based grants to executives on other dates for reasons such as newly hired executives or for retention purposes. Such grants are generally effective on the first day of the Company’s next open trading window following approval by the CPCC.
Termination and Change in Control Provisions are CPCC-Directed
Under our Nordstrom, Inc. Executive Severance Plan, eligible Executive Officers, including certain NEOs, are entitled to receive severance benefits upon involuntary termination of employment by the Company to assist in the transition from active employment. To be eligible to participate in the Plan upon involuntary termination, the NEO must have signed a non-competition and non-solicitation agreement. Erik Nordstrom and Peter Nordstrom are not eligible for separation benefits under the Plan, and Anne Bramman has elected not to participate in the Plan. Separation benefits are described in the Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control section beginning on page 53.
As described in the same section, the NEOs are generally not entitled to any payment or accelerated benefit in connection with a change in control of the Company. However, the NEOs are entitled to accelerated vesting of equity if they experience a qualifying termination (termination by the Company without cause or termination by the executive for good reason) within 12 months following a change in control, unless the Company and the CPCC does not act to cause the NEOs to receive, on account of the equity award, cash or other property being paid to shareholders in the change in control transaction.
Tax and Accounting Considerations Underlie the Compensation Elements
The CPCC recognizes the tax and regulatory factors that can influence the structure of executive compensation programs, including:
•Section 162(m) of the IRC, which disallows a tax deduction to public companies for annual compensation over $1 million paid to “covered employees” which generally includes NEOs. Certain performance-based compensation under arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017 are not subject to the limitation. Therefore, compensation in excess of $1 million paid to our NEOs is generally expected to be nondeductible by the Company.
•FASB ASC 718, where stock options, PSUs and RSUs are accounted for based on their grant date fair value (see the notes to the financial statements contained within the Company’s 2021 Annual Report). The CPCC regularly considers the accounting implications of our equity-based awards.
•Section 409A of the IRC, the limitations of which primarily relate to the deferral and payment of benefits under the NDCP and SERP. The CPCC continues to consider the impact of Section 409A and in general, the evolving tax and regulatory landscape in which its compensation decisions are made.
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the total compensation paid or accrued by the Company for services provided by the NEOs for fiscal years ended January 29, 2022, January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and Principal Position | Fiscal Year | Salary ($)(a) | Bonus ($)(b) | Stock Awards ($)(c) | Option Awards ($)(d) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(e) | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)(f) | All Other Compensation ($)(g) | Total ($) |
Erik B. Nordstrom | 2021 | | 758,700 | | — | | — | | 3,699,999 | | 1,941,761 | | (692,013) | | 44,686 | | 5,753,133 | |
Chief Executive Officer | 2020 | | 367,419 | | — | | 1,592,846 | | 2,654,740 | | — | | 1,010,681 | | 21,984 | | 5,647,670 | |
| 2019 | | 756,393 | | — | | 1,592,836 | | 1,061,897 | | 708,591 | | 2,700,516 | | 52,070 | | 6,872,303 | |
Anne L. Bramman | 2021 | | 812,892 | | — | | 1,319,977 | | 879,995 | | 1,040,246 | | — | | 24,679 | | 4,077,789 | |
Chief Financial Officer | 2020 | | 699,231 | | — | | 1,999,988 | | 1,824,997 | | — | | — | | 14,411 | | 4,538,627 | |
| 2019 | | 793,750 | | — | | 1,549,974 | | 1,859,994 | | 564,500 | | — | | 39,912 | | 4,808,130 | |
Peter E. Nordstrom | 2021 | | 758,700 | | — | | — | | 3,699,999 | | 1,941,761 | | (1,364,580) | | 56,475 | | 5,092,355 | |
President and Chief Brand Officer | 2020 | | 367,419 | | — | | 1,592,846 | | 2,654,740 | | — | | 1,055,774 | | 24,849 | | 5,695,628 | |
2019 | | 756,393 | | — | | 1,592,836 | | 1,061,897 | | 708,591 | | 2,782,378 | | 77,355 | | 6,979,450 | |
Kenneth J. Worzel | 2021 | | 892,123 | | — | | 1,443,737 | | 962,494 | | 1,427,077 | | 1,389,900 | | 32,195 | | 6,147,526 | |
Chief Customer Officer | 2020 | | 764,597 | | — | | 2,624,977 | | 2,374,996 | | — | | 864,312 | | 18,367 | | 6,647,249 | |
2019 | | 826,111 | | — | | 1,999,970 | | 2,400,000 | | 645,433 | | 1,589,618 | | 37,080 | | 7,498,212 | |
Edmond Mesrobian | 2021 | | 827,123 | | — | | 1,394,971 | | 929,995 | | 815,262 | | — | | 12,158 | | 3,979,509 | |
Chief Technology Officer | 2020 | | 677,214 | | — | | 1,549,973 | | 1,374,995 | | — | | — | | 7,917 | | 3,610,099 | |
2019 | | 743,542 | | — | | 2,087,450 | | 1,304,995 | | 420,971 | | — | | 10,225 | | 4,567,183 | |
(a)Salary
The amounts shown represent base salary earned during the fiscal year. The numbers shown for all fiscal years vary somewhat from annual base salaries due to the fact that our fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest to January 31st and salary increases are effective on or about April 1st of each year. The 2021 base salaries were $758,500 each for Erik Nordstrom and Peter Nordstrom, $815,000 for Anne Bramman, $895,000 for Kenneth Worzel and $800,000 for Edmond Mesrobian.
Anne Bramman elected to defer 10% of her base salary earned during calendar year 2022 into the NDCP. Kenneth Worzel elected to defer $50,000 of his base salary earned during calendar year 2021 and 10% of his base earned during calendar year 2022 into the NDCP. Due to the timing of our fiscal year ends, $3,135 and $51,442 were attributed to fiscal year 2021 deferrals for Anne Bramman and Kenneth Worzel, respectively, as reported in the Fiscal Year 2021 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table on page 53.
Each of the NEOs contributed a portion of their base salary earned during fiscal year 2021 to the 401(k) Plan.
The amounts reported for fiscal year 2020 reflect the reduced base salaries of the NEOs, as part of the Company’s response to business impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic. Base salaries were reduced from March 29, 2020 to October 3, 2020, as follows: Erik Nordstrom and Peter Nordstrom received no base salary, while Anne Bramman, Kenneth Worzel and Edmond Mesrobian received a 25% base salary reduction.
(b) Bonus
This column refers to one-time payments not made under the EMBP. No amounts were paid to NEOs.
(c) Stock Awards
The amounts reported reflect the grant date fair value of RSUs and PSUs granted during the fiscal year under the 2010 and 2019 EIPs. The amounts reported are not the value actually received.
The value the NEOs may receive from their RSUs will depend on whether the time-based vesting requirement is met and the market price of Common Stock on the vesting date. The amounts reported were calculated in accordance with ASC 718. See column (c) of the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2021 table on page 46 for the number of RSUs granted in fiscal year 2021.
No PSU amounts are reported for fiscal year 2021 as the Company did not award PSUs during the fiscal year. The PSU amounts reported in fiscal year 2020 reflects grants of PSUs that were subsequently cancelled 6 months later as part of the Company’s response to COVID. The cancelled PSU grants to Erik Nordstrom and Peter Nordstrom each had a grant date fair value of $1,592,846. The cancelled PSU grants to Anne Bramman, Kenneth Worzel and Edmond Mesrobian had a grant date fair value of $1,199,989, $1,574,982 and $929,983, respectively. As discussed on page 38, the 2019 PSUs did not meet the performance thresholds required for payout. As a result, none of the 2019 PSUs vested. The amounts reported were calculated in accordance with ASC 718.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 43 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
(d) Option Awards
The amounts reported reflect the grant date fair value of stock options granted during the fiscal year under the 2010 and 2019 EIPs. This is not the value received. The NEOs will only realize value from stock options if the market price of Common Stock is higher than the exercise price of the options at the time of exercise. The amounts reported were calculated in accordance with ASC 718. See column (d) of the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2021 table on page 46 for the number of stock options granted in fiscal year 2021.
Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in the notes to the financial statements contained within the Company’s 2021 Annual Report.
(e) Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
The amounts reported reflect the annual performance-based cash awards under the EMBP, as described on page 37.
(f) Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
The amounts reported are the changes in actuarial present value from 2020 fiscal year-end to 2021 fiscal year-end for each of the eligible NEO’s benefit under the SERP. The present value of the benefit is affected by current earnings, credited years of service, the executive’s age and time until normal retirement eligibility, the age of the executive’s spouse or life partner as the potential beneficiary and economic assumptions (discount rate and mortality table used to determine the present value of the benefit).
The present value of Erik Nordstrom’s and Peter Nordstrom’s benefits decreased from 2020 fiscal year-end by $692,013 and $1,364,580, respectively. The decreases were primarily the result of an increase in the discount rate used to determine the present value of the benefits. The interest rate used is the same as the discount rate used for financial reporting purposes for the SERP which changed from 2.62% to 3.19%. The present value of Kenneth Worzel’s benefit increased by $1,389,900, primarily due to an increase to service and pay, which more than offset any decrease due to the change in the discount rate, as mentioned above. Amounts are not reported for Anne Bramman and Edmond Mesrobian because the SERP was closed to new entrants prior to when they joined the Company. See the Pension Benefits section beginning on page 51 for more information about the SERP.
The amounts were calculated using the same discount rate assumptions as those used in the Company’s financial statements to calculate the Company’s obligations under the SERP. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in the notes to the financial statements contained within the Company’s 2021 Annual Report.
Anne Bramman, Kenneth Worzel and Edmond Mesrobian had account balances in the NDCP in fiscal year 2021, as shown on page 53. They did not receive above-market-rate or preferential earnings on their deferred compensation, so no amounts for these types of earnings are included in the table.
(g) All Other Compensation
Each component of all other compensation paid to the NEOs is shown in the table below.
| | |
|
All Other Compensation in Fiscal Year 2021 |
The table below shows each component of “All Other Compensation” for fiscal year 2021, reported in column (g) of the Summary Compensation Table on page 43, calculated at the aggregate incremental cost to the Company.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | Merchandise Discount ($)(a) | | 401(k) Plan Company Match ($)(b) | | Premium on Insurance ($)(c) | | Personal Use of Company Aircraft ($)(d) | | | | Total ($) |
Erik B. Nordstrom | 36,826 | | | 5,812 | | | 2,048 | | | — | | | | | 44,686 | |
Anne L. Bramman | 10,659 | | | 11,833 | | | 2,187 | | | — | | | | | 24,679 | |
Peter E. Nordstrom | 34,977 | | | 8,145 | | | 2,048 | | | 11,305 | | | | | 56,475 | |
Kenneth J. Worzel | 17,214 | | | 12,583 | | | 2,398 | | | — | | | | | 32,195 | |
Edmond Mesrobian | 1,835 | | | 8,187 | | | 2,136 | | | — | | | | | 12,158 | |
(a)Merchandise Discount
The Company provides a broad-based merchandise discount for its employees. The NEOs, their spouses and eligible children, were provided a discount of 33% for purchases at Nordstrom stores, Nordstrom.com, Trunk Club and TrunkClub.com and 20% for purchases at Nordstrom Rack stores, NordstromRack.com, and our restaurants. A 40% discount is available at certain times of the year on specific merchandise. The merchandise discount provided to the NEOs is the same as for all other eligible management and high-performing non-management employees of the Company, and its Board, as described on page 17. The amounts reported are the total discount the NEOs received on their Nordstrom purchases during fiscal year 2021.
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
(b)401(k) Plan Company Match
The Company offers a matching contribution on employee 401(k) contributions under the 401(k) Plan to all eligible employees, including the NEOs. The NEOs and all other Company employees, may defer up to 50% of their eligible pay (i.e., base salary, performance-based bonus and other taxable wages) into the 401(k) Plan, subject to IRC limits.
Company matching contributions are made each pay period an employee contributes to the 401(k) Plan, equal to a dollar for dollar match up to 1% of eligible pay then $0.50 per dollar on the next 6% of eligible pay, up to a maximum of 4% of eligible pay and IRC limits. The total Company matching contribution each of the NEOs received, as shown on the previous page, reflects this matching formula for fiscal year 2021.
Contributions under the 401(k) Plan may be directed to custom target retirement date funds or to any of 9 individual investment alternatives, including Common Stock. The Plan also offers a self-directed brokerage option.
(c)Premium on Insurance
The Company provides life insurance to the NEOs in an amount equal to approximately 1.25 times their base salary and additional disability insurance. The amounts reported are the annual Company-paid premiums.
(d) Personal Use of Company Aircraft
The Company has a fractional ownership interest in an aircraft which it charters for business purposes. On rare occasions, a NEO may have a guest accompany them on a business trip as an additional passenger. Only the direct variable costs (i.e., costs the Company incurs solely as a result of the passenger being on the aircraft) are included in determining the aggregate incremental cost to the Company. When travel does not meet the IRS standard for business travel, the cost of the travel is imputed as income to the executive, which is the Company’s practice to fully disclose. The Company does not reimburse the NEOs for taxes incurred as a result of the imputed income.
In fiscal year 2021, Peter Nordstrom was accompanied by a family member on one business trip. The costs reported are the total direct variable costs associated with the family member’s travel, which include the tax deduction the Company was not able to take as a result of the nondeductible portion of the aircraft operating costs.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 45 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2021
The following table discloses the potential range of payouts for:
•non-equity incentive plan awards granted in fiscal year 2021. These awards are performance-based cash bonuses granted under the EMBP, as described on page 37;
•the number, price and grant date fair value of stock options granted under the 2019 EIP in fiscal year 2021, as described on page 38; and
•the number and grant date fair value of RSUs granted under the 2019 EIP in fiscal year 2021, as described on page 38.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (b) | | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)(c) | All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)(d) | Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)(e) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(f) |
Name and Award | Grant Date (a) | Approval Date | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) |
Erik B. Nordstrom | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EMBP | | | 379,250 | | 1,517,001 | | 3,792,502 | | | | | | | | | |
Stock Option | 3/4/2021 | 2/23/2021 | | | | | | | | | 297,619 | | 35.52 | | 3,699,999 | |
Anne L. Bramman | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EMBP | | | 203,173 | | 812,692 | | 2,031,730 | | | | | | | | | |
RSU | 3/4/2021 | 2/23/2021 | | | | | | | | 40,060 | | | 1,319,977 | |
Stock Option | 3/4/2021 | 2/23/2021 | | | | | | | | | 63,008 | | 35.52 | | 879,995 | |
Peter E. Nordstrom | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EMBP | | | 379,250 | | 1,517,001 | | 3,792,502 | | | | | | | | | |
Stock Option | 3/4/2021 | 2/23/2021 | | | | | | | | | 297,619 | | 35.52 | | 3,699,999 | |
Kenneth J. Worzel | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EMBP | | | 278,726 | | 1,114,904 | | 2,787,260 | | | | | | | | | |
RSU | 3/4/2021 | 2/23/2021 | | | | | | | | 43,816 | | | 1,443,737 | |
Stock Option | 3/4/2021 | 2/23/2021 | | | | | | | | | 68,915 | | 35.52 | | 962,494 | |
Edmond Mesrobian | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EMBP | | | 159,231 | | 636,923 | | 1,592,307 | | | | | | | | | |
RSU | 3/4/2021 | 2/23/2021 | | | | | | | | 42,336 | | | 1,394,971 | |
Stock Option | 3/4/2021 | 2/23/2021 | | | | | | | | | 66,588 | | 35.52 | | 929,995 | |
(a) Grant Date
The grant date is the first business day of the open trading window that falls on or after the CPCC approval of the grant.
(b) Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
The amounts shown report the range of possible cash payouts for fiscal year 2021 associated with established levels of performance or achievement under the EMBP. The amounts shown in the “Threshold,” “Target” and “Maximum” columns reflect the payout opportunity associated with established levels of performance or achievement, as discussed on page 37. For there to be any payout, minimum performance milestones or achievement must be met.
Although the column heading refers to future payouts, fiscal year 2021 performance-based bonuses have already been earned and were paid to the NEOs in March 2022, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 43, in column (e), “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.”
(c) All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units
The numbers shown report the number of RSUs granted to the NEOs in fiscal year 2021 under the 2019 EIP. RSUs were granted on March 4, 2021 to Anne Bramman, Kenneth Worzel and Edmond Mesrobian and will vest equally over four years, beginning on March 10, 2022.
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
(d) All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options
The numbers shown report the number of stock options granted to the NEOs in fiscal year 2021 under the 2019 EIP. Stock options were granted on March 4, 2021 and become exercisable on March 10, 2024 and March 10, 2025.
(e) Exercise or Base Price of Options Awards
The exercise price of the stock options granted on March 4, 2021 of $35.52 was the closing price of Common Stock on the grant date.
(f) Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards
The grant date fair value of RSUs and stock options was calculated in accordance with ASC 718.
The reported value for RSUs was calculated by multiplying the number of RSUs awarded by the fair value of a RSU on the date of grant, which was $32.95 on March 4, 2021. The actual value the NEOs may receive will depend on whether the time-based vesting requirement is met and the market price of Common Stock at the time of any vesting.
The reported value of stock options was calculated by multiplying the number of options awarded by the fair value of an option on the date of grant. After taking into account the vesting price hurdle relevant to their awards, the fair value for the stock option grant on March 4, 2021 to Erik Nordstrom and Peter Nordstrom was $12.43. The fair value for the stock option grants on March 4, 2021 to Anne Bramman, Kenneth Worzel and Edmond Mesrobian was $13.96. The actual value received by the NEOs will be the number of options exercised multiplied by the difference between the stock price at the future exercise date and the grant price. The grant price on March 4, 2021 was $35.52.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 47 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2021
The following table provides information on the current holdings of stock options and stock awards by the NEOs as of the fiscal year ended January 29, 2022. The table includes vested but unexercised stock options, unvested stock options, and unvested RSUs. The vesting schedules for outstanding stock options and RSUs are provided on pages 49 and 50, respectively. Information about the amount of Common Stock beneficially owned by the NEOs is provided in the Beneficial Ownership Table on page 61.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Option Awards | | Stock Awards |
| | | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexer- cised Unearned Options (#) | | | | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(b) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(c) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(d) |
| | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | |
Name | Grant Date | Exer- cisable | Unexer- cisable (a) | |
Erik B. Nordstrom | 2/22/2012 | 68,244 | | — | | | 49.15 | | 2/22/2022 | | | | | |
3/4/2013 | 99,563 | | — | | | 50.26 | | 3/4/2023 | | | | | |
| 3/3/2014 | 60,747 | | — | | | 57.16 | | 3/3/2024 | | | | | |
| 2/24/2015 | 45,996 | | — | | | 75.23 | | 2/24/2025 | | | | | |
| 2/29/2016 | 82,141 | | — | | | 51.32 | | 2/28/2026 | | | | | |
| 6/7/2016 | 10,838 | | — | | | 40.50 | | 6/7/2026 | | | | | |
| 2/28/2017 | 38,653 | | — | | | 46.66 | | 2/28/2027 | | | | | |
| 3/6/2018 | | | | | | | 13,053 | | 285,208 | | | |
| 3/5/2019 | 36,534 | | 36,535 | | | 45.33 | | 3/5/2029 | | | | | |
| 3/9/2020 | 36,851 | | 110,556 | | | 26.79 | | 3/9/2030 | | | | | |
| 8/27/2020 | — | | 245,829 | | | 14.79 | | 8/27/2030 | | | | | |
| 3/4/2021 | — | | 297,619 | | | 35.52 | | 3/4/2031 | | | | | |
Anne L. Bramman | 3/6/2018 | | | | | | | 11,492 | 251,100 | | |
3/6/2018 | | | | | | | 6,704 | 146,482 | | |
| 3/5/2019 | — | 123,554 | | 45.33 | 3/5/2029 | | | | | |
| 3/5/2019 | | | | | | | 7,481 | 163,460 | | |
| 3/9/2020 | | | | | | | 25,986 | 567,794 | | |
| 8/27/2020 | — | 281,657 | | 14.79 | 8/27/2030 | | | | | |
| 3/4/2021 | — | 63,008 | | 35.52 | 3/4/2031 | | | | | |
| 3/4/2021 | | | | | | | 40,060 | 875,311 | | |
Peter E. Nordstrom | 2/22/2012 | 68,244 | — | | 49.15 | 2/22/2022 | | | | | |
3/4/2013 | 99,563 | — | | 50.26 | 3/4/2023 | | | | | |
| 3/3/2014 | 60,747 | — | | 57.16 | 3/3/2024 | | | | | |
| 2/24/2015 | 45,996 | — | | 75.23 | 2/24/2025 | | | | | |
| 2/29/2016 | 82,141 | — | | 51.32 | 2/28/2026 | | | | | |
| 6/7/2016 | 10,838 | — | | 40.50 | 6/7/2026 | | | | | |
| 2/28/2017 | 38,653 | — | | 46.66 | 2/28/2027 | | | | | |
| 3/6/2018 | | | | | | | 13,053 | 285,208 | | |
| 3/5/2019 | 36,534 | 36,535 | | 45.33 | 3/5/2029 | | | | | |
| 3/9/2020 | 36,851 | 110,556 | | 26.79 | 3/9/2030 | | | | | |
| 8/27/2020 | — | 245,829 | | 14.79 | 8/27/2030 | | | | | |
| 3/4/2021 | — | 297,619 | | 35.52 | 3/4/2031 | | | | | |
Kenneth J. Worzel | 3/4/2013 | 40,536 | — | | 50.26 | 3/4/2023 | | | | | |
3/3/2014 | 26,141 | — | | 57.16 | 3/3/2024 | | | | | |
| 2/24/2015 | 20,585 | — | | 75.23 | 2/24/2025 | | | | | |
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Option Awards | | Stock Awards |
| | | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexer- cised Unearned Options (#) | | | | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(b) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(c) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(d) |
| | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | |
Name | Grant Date | Exer- cisable | Unexer- cisable (a) | |
| 2/29/2016 | 38,057 | — | | 51.32 | 2/28/2026 | | | | | |
| 6/7/2016 | 23,433 | — | | 40.50 | 6/7/2026 | | | | | |
| 2/28/2017 | 16,464 | — | | 46.66 | 2/28/2027 | | | | | |
| 3/6/2018 | | | | | | | 6,453 | 140,998 | | |
| 3/6/2018 | | | | | | | 11,492 | 251,100 | | |
| 3/5/2019 | — | 159,425 | | 45.33 | 3/5/2029 | | | | | |
| 3/5/2019 | | | | | | | 9,292 | 203,030 | | |
| 3/9/2020 | | | | | | | 32,833 | 717,401 | | |
| 8/27/2020 | — | 366,540 | | 14.79 | 8/27/2030 | | | | | |
| 3/4/2021 | — | 68,915 | | 35.52 | 3/4/2031 | | | | | |
| 3/4/2021 | | | | | | | 42,181 | 921,655 | | |
Edmond Mesrobian | 8/27/2018 | | | | | | | 9,526 | 208,143 | | |
3/5/2019 | — | 86,687 | | 45.33 | 3/5/2029 | | | | | |
| 3/5/2019 | | | | | | | 5,249 | 114,691 | | |
| 8/26/2019 | | | | | | | 12,840 | 280,554 | | |
| 3/9/2020 | | | | | | | 20,139 | 440,037 | | |
| 8/27/2020 | — | 212,207 | | 14.79 | 8/27/2030 | | | | | |
| 3/4/2021 | — | 66,588 | | 35.52 | 3/4/2031 | | | | | |
| 3/4/2021 | | | | | | | 42,336 | 925,042 | | |
(a)Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options: Unexercisable
The following table shows the grant date, vesting schedule and expiration date for all unvested stock options as of the fiscal year ended January 29, 2022. On March 5, 2019, Erik Nordstrom and Peter Nordstrom received a stock option grant with a four-year vesting schedule of 25% per year. On March 5, 2019, Anne Bramman, Kenneth Worzel and Edmond Mesrobian received a stock option grant with a four-year vesting schedule of 50% on March 10, 2022 and 50% March 10, 2023. On March 4, 2021, Erik Nordstrom and Peter Nordstrom received a stock option grant that vests 50% on March 10, 2024 and 50% March 10, 2025 subject to the condition that the average daily closing price of our Common Stock meets or exceeds $45 per share for any twenty consecutive trading day period prior to March 10, 2025. On March 4, 2021, Anne Bramman, Kenneth Worzel and Edmond Mesrobian also received a stock option grant that vests 50% on March 10, 2024 and 50% March 10, 2025, and is not subject to a price condition for vesting.
| | | | | | | | |
Grant Date | Vesting Schedule | Expiration Date |
3/5/2019 | 25% per year with remaining vesting dates of 3/10/2022 and 3/10/2023 | 3/5/2029 |
3/5/2019 | 50% on 3/10/2022 and 50% on 3/10/2023 | 3/5/2029 |
3/9/2020 | 25% per year with remaining vesting dates of 3/10/2022, 3/10/2023 and 3/10/2024 | 3/9/2030 |
8/27/2020 | 100% vest on 9/10/2022 | 8/27/2030 |
3/4/2021 | 50% on 3/10/2024 and 50% on 3/10/2025 | 3/4/2031 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 49 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
(b) Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
The following table shows the grant date and vesting schedule for all unvested RSUs as of the fiscal year ended January 29, 2022.
| | | | | |
Grant Date | Vesting Schedule |
3/6/2018 | 25% per year with a remaining vesting date of 3/10/2022 |
8/27/2018 | 25% per year with a remaining vesting date of 9/10/2022 |
3/5/2019 | 25% per year with remaining vesting dates of 3/10/2022 and 3/10/2023 |
8/26/2019 | 33% in years one and two and 34% in the final year with a remaining vesting date of 9/10/2022 |
3/9/2020 | 25% per year with remaining vesting dates of 3/10/2022, 3/10/2023 and 3/10/2024 |
3/4/2021 | 25% per year with vesting dates of 3/10/2022, 3/10/2023, 3/10/2024 and 3/10/2025 |
(c) Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
The PSUs granted on March 9, 2020 were cancelled on August 18, 2020, as discussed on page 43, and are not reflected in the table beginning on page 48.
(d) Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
The PSUs granted on March 9, 2020 were cancelled on August 18, 2020, as discussed on page 43, and are not reflected in the table beginning on page 48.
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal Year 2021
The following table provides information for the NEOs on the number of shares of Common Stock acquired and value realized from RSUs that vested with respect to fiscal year 2021.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Option Awards | | Stock Awards |
Name | | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | | Value Realized on Exercise ($) | | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)(a) | | Value Realized on Vesting ($)(b) |
| | | | | | | | |
Erik B. Nordstrom | | — | | | — | | | 19,961 | | | 752,729 | |
Anne L. Bramman | | — | | | — | | | 30,595 | | | 1,153,737 | |
Peter E. Nordstrom | | — | | | — | | | 19,950 | | | 752,315 | |
Kenneth J. Worzel | | — | | | — | | | 38,111 | | | 1,410,499 | |
Edmond Mesrobian | | — | | | — | | | 31,702 | | | 945,207 | |
(a) Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting
The numbers reported are the RSUs that vested during the fiscal year.
(b) Value Realized on Vesting
The amounts reported are the value realized for the RSUs that vested during the fiscal year.
Pension Benefits
The Company’s original SERP was introduced in the 1980s. Over the years, the plan design changed to better meet the purpose of encouraging designated executives to stay with Nordstrom throughout their careers and rewarding their significant and sustained contribution to the Company’s success by adding to their financial security upon retirement. Beginning in 2012, the SERP was closed to new entrants.
The NEOs, except Anne Bramman and Edmond Mesrobian, who both joined the Company after the SERP had been closed to new entrants, are eligible for the SERP. The eligible NEOs are entitled to receive their full retirement benefit at age 58. Their full benefit is equal to 1.6% multiplied by final average pay, as described in the following paragraph, and their years of credited service, up to a maximum of 25 years. They may retire early and could receive a reduced benefit if they are between the ages of 53 and 57, inclusive, with at least 10 years of credited service and the Board approves the early retirement. The early retirement benefit is reduced 10% for each year that their retirement age is less than 58. If they retire after age 58, they are entitled to their full retirement benefit, increased with interest of 5% per year, compounded annually, for each full year worked beyond age 58, for a maximum of 10 years. The annual SERP benefit is capped at $700,000 after any early retirement reductions are applied.
Final average pay is the average base salary and annual performance-based cash bonus of the highest 36 months over the longer of:
•the most recent five years of service; or
•the entire period of service after the executive’s 53rd birthday.
The annual SERP benefit is paid upon retirement for the remaining life of the executive with a 50% annuity paid to a surviving spouse or life partner after the executive’s death. A surviving spouse or life partner also receives a 50% survivor benefit if the executive dies before retiring. The amount of this survivor benefit depends on the executive’s age and years of credited service at the time of death.
The SERP provides that no benefit will be paid to an executive whose employment is terminated for cause, which includes competitive behavior against the Company, as determined by the CPCC in the exercise of its discretion in accordance with the Plan. The CPCC also has discretion to discontinue payment of benefits under the SERP if the retired executive is found to have engaged in misconduct or in competitive behavior against the Company.
Information about payment of the SERP benefit related to change in control is provided on pages 56 and 57 in footnote (b) to the Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control at Fiscal Year-End 2021 table.
Because the SERP is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan, the Company is not obligated to fund it. If the Company were to become insolvent, participants would be unsecured general creditors, and there is no guarantee that funds would be available to pay all creditors in full. See the notes to the financial statements contained within the Company’s 2021 Annual Report for a discussion of the benefit obligation.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 51 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Fiscal Year 2021 Pension Benefits Table
The following table shows the present value of the accumulated SERP benefit payable to each of the NEOs, based on the number of years of service credited under the Plan to each NEO and actuarial assumptions consistent with those used in the Company’s 2021 Annual Report to calculate the Company’s obligations under the Plan. See Note 8: Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan to the financial statements contained within the Company’s 2021 Annual Report for a discussion of the benefit obligation and assumptions used.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Present Value of Accumulated Benefit | | |
Name | | Plan Name | | Age (a) | | Number of Years Credited Service (#)(b) | | Full Retirement Benefit ($)(c) | | Early Retirement Benefit ($)(d) | | Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($) |
Erik B. Nordstrom | | SERP | | 58 | | | 25 | | | 13,595,960 | | | — | | | — | |
Anne L. Bramman | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Peter E. Nordstrom | | SERP | | 59 | | | 25 | | | 13,706,490 | | | — | | | — | |
Kenneth J. Worzel | | SERP | | 57 | | | 12 | | | 6,780,714 | | | 6,395,816 | | | — | |
Edmond Mesrobian | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Age is as of January 29, 2022, the last day of the fiscal year.
(b) Number of Years Credited Service
Although Erik Nordstrom and Peter Nordstrom each have more than 25 years of service, the number of years of credited service under the SERP is capped at 25.
(c) Present Value of Accumulated Benefit: Full Retirement Benefit
The amounts shown are based on the full retirement age of 58. Erik Nordstrom and Peter Nordstrom have met the minimum full retirement age with at least 10 years of credited service and would be eligible to receive the SERP benefit having the present values as shown in the table above. Kenneth Worzel will be eligible for full retirement on his 58th birthday, and his present value for full retirement is shown in the table above.
(d) Present Value of Accumulated Benefit: Early Retirement Benefit
Kenneth Worzel has met the minimum early retirement age with at least 10 years of credited service and would be eligible for early retirement with prior approval from the Board. The present value of his early retirement benefit is shown in the table above. Early retirement benefits are not applicable for Erik Nordstrom and Peter Nordstrom, as they have both met the minimum full retirement age of 58.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
The Company offers participation in the NDCP to employees, including the NEOs, who meet a minimum compensation threshold. Under this Plan, a participant may defer up to 80% of base salary, up to 100% of performance-based bonus earned under the Company’s bonus plan and up to 100% of any vested PSUs, less applicable payroll taxes. Deferral elections are irrevocable and are made in compliance with Section 409A of the IRC. If a participant’s NDCP deferrals cause a reduction in the Company’s 401(k) match contribution, the Company may deposit a make-up contribution into the participant’s NDCP account. The Company may also provide a matching contribution, up to 4% of eligible pay over the 401(k) calendar year compensation limit, on deferrals into the NDCP by eligible participants. Participants in the Company’s SERP are not eligible for this matching contribution.
Plan participants may direct their cash deferrals to deemed investment alternatives, priced and valued similar to retail mutual funds. As of the end of the fiscal year, the Company offered 9 deemed investment alternatives. In addition, Plan participants are offered a fixed rate option, which was 4.31% for calendar year 2021 and 4.36% for calendar year 2022, which is not subsidized by the Company but rather is a rate based on guaranteed contractual returns from a third-party insurance company provider. With the exception of the fixed rate fund, participants may change their investment allocations among these investment alternatives daily. Gains and losses for cash deferrals are credited to participant accounts daily, based on their investment elections. The deemed investment alternatives for cash do not include Common Stock. Vested PSUs that are deferred into the NDCP remain as stock units until distribution.
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Fiscal Year 2021 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table
The following table discloses information on nonqualified deferred compensation for the NEOs under the Company’s NDCP for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2022. The Company’s SERP is also a nonqualified plan. Information regarding benefits payable to NEOs under the SERP is provided on pages 51 and 52.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | | Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)(a) | | Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($) | | Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($)(b) | | Aggregate Withdrawals/Distributions ($) | | Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year-End ($)(c) |
Erik B. Nordstrom | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Anne L. Bramman | | 3,135 | | | — | | | 10,273 | | | — | | | 252,080 | |
Peter E. Nordstrom | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Kenneth J. Worzel | | 51,442 | | | — | | | (16,408) | | | — | | | 888,438 | |
Edmond Mesrobian | | — | | | — | | | 11,381 | | | — | | | 200,533 | |
(a) Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year
The amounts reported are the deferrals made during the fiscal year.
(b) Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year
The amounts include the total interest or other earnings accrued in fiscal year 2021 on the entire NDCP account balance, including deferred PSUs.
(c) Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year-End
The amounts shown are the total NDCP balances, including earnings on deferrals, as of January 29, 2022.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
The information on the following pages describes and quantifies certain amounts that would become payable under existing compensation plans if the NEOs’ employment had terminated on January 29, 2022, the last day of the fiscal year. The amounts are based on each executive’s compensation and years of service as of that date and, if applicable, based on the closing price of Common Stock on January 28, 2022, the last market trading day of the fiscal year, of $21.85. The estimates are based on all relevant plans effective at the end of the fiscal year and information available at that time. Actual values would reflect specific circumstances at the time of any termination, the plans and provisions effective if and when a termination event occurs and any other applicable factors.
The Company does not have employment agreements with any Nordstrom employees, including the NEOs. The Company maintains an executive severance plan to provide certain NEOs an appropriate level of severance benefits in the event of involuntary separation of service, not for cause. Except as described on the following pages, there are no agreements, arrangements or plans that entitle the NEOs to enhanced benefits upon termination of their employment.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 53 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
| | |
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control at Fiscal Year-End 2021 |
The following table shows various termination scenarios and payments that would be triggered under the Company’s compensation plans.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and Potential Payment | | Death ($) | | Disability ($) | | Retirement ($) | | Termination without Cause ($) | | Qualifying Termination Following a Change in Control ($) |
Erik B. Nordstrom | | | | | | | | | | |
Continued or Accelerated Vesting of Equity Awards(a) | | 1,486,745 | | | 1,486,745 | | | 285,208 | | | 285,208 | | | 2,020,761 | |
Vested SERP Benefit(b) | | 6,525,225 | | | 13,595,960 | | | 13,595,960 | | | 13,595,960 | | | 13,595,960 | |
Life Insurance Proceeds(c) | | 948,125 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Retiree Health Care Benefit(d) | | 196,102 | | | 412,427 | | | 412,427 | | | 412,427 | | | 412,427 | |
Separation Benefit(e) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Disability Insurance Benefit(f) | | — | | | 35,000 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Executive Management Bonus(g) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total Value of Incremental Benefits | | 9,156,197 | | | 15,530,132 | | | 14,293,595 | | | 14,293,595 | | | 16,029,148 | |
Anne L. Bramman | | | | | | | | | | |
Continued or Accelerated Vesting of Equity Awards(a) | | 3,380,800 | | | 3,380,800 | | | — | | | — | | | 3,992,646 | |
Vested SERP Benefit(b) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Life Insurance Proceeds(c) | | 1,018,750 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Retiree Health Care Benefit(d) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Separation Benefit(e) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Disability Insurance Benefit(f) | | — | | | 35,000 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Executive Management Bonus(g) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total Value of Incremental Benefits | | 4,399,550 | | | 3,415,800 | | | — | | | — | | | 3,992,646 | |
Peter E. Nordstrom | | | | | | | | | | |
Continued or Accelerated Vesting of Equity Awards(a) | | 1,486,745 | | | 1,486,745 | | | 285,208 | | | 285,208 | | | 2,020,761 | |
Vested SERP Benefit(b) | | 7,028,770 | | | 13,706,490 | | | 13,706,490 | | | 13,706,490 | | | 13,706,490 | |
Life Insurance Proceeds(c) | | 948,125 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Retiree Health Care Benefit(d) | | 180,909 | | | 372,074 | | | 372,074 | | | 372,074 | | | 372,074 | |
Separation Benefit(e) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Disability Insurance Benefit(f) | | — | | | 35,000 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Executive Management Bonus(g) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total Value of Incremental Benefits | | 9,644,549 | | | 15,600,309 | | | 14,363,772 | | | 14,363,772 | | | 16,099,325 | |
Kenneth J. Worzel | | | | | | | | | | |
Continued or Accelerated Vesting of Equity Awards(a) | | 4,025,719 | | | 4,025,719 | | | 1,983,084 | | | 1,983,084 | | | 4,821,957 | |
Vested SERP Benefit(b) | | 3,275,006 | | | — | | | 6,395,816 | | | 6,395,816 | | | 6,395,816 | |
Life Insurance Proceeds(c) | | 1,118,750 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Retiree Health Care Benefit(d) | | 203,177 | | | 431,582 | | | 431,582 | | | 431,582 | | | 431,582 | |
Separation Benefit(e) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,164,498 | | | — | |
Disability Insurance Benefit(f) | | — | | | 35,000 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Executive Management Bonus(g) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total Value of Incremental Benefits | | 8,622,652 | | | 4,492,301 | | | 8,810,482 | | | 9,974,980 | | | 11,649,355 | |
Edmond Mesrobian | | | | | | | | | | |
Continued or Accelerated Vesting of Equity Awards(a) | | 2,946,605 | | | 2,946,605 | | | — | | | — | | | 3,466,648 | |
Vested SERP Benefit(b) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Life Insurance Proceeds(c) | | 1,000,000 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Retiree Health Care Benefit(d) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Separation Benefit(e) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,604,200 | | | — | |
Disability Insurance Benefit(f) | | — | | | 35,000 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Executive Management Bonus(g) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total Value of Incremental Benefits | | 3,946,605 | | | 2,981,605 | | | — | | | 1,604,200 | | | 3,466,648 | |
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
(a) Continued or Accelerated Vesting of Equity Awards
As of the end of fiscal year 2021, the NEOs had outstanding equity awards under our 2010 and 2019 EIPs. Treatment of the awards under various termination scenarios is described below.
Stock Options
Death or Disability
The stock option agreements under the Company’s 2010 and 2019 EIPs generally provide that if a participant’s employment is terminated by reason of death or disability, all unvested stock options will immediately vest, with the exception of one-time stock option grants. The one-time stock option grant made on August 27, 2020 to each of the NEOs, as well as other one-time stock option grants which are not reflected in the table on page 54 because they carry exercise prices in excess of the value of our Common Stock as of end of fiscal year 2021, provides that if a participant’s employment is terminated by reason of death or disability, a prorated number of the stock options granted will immediately vest based on the number of full months employed. All outstanding stock option agreements provide that if a participant’s employment is terminated by reason of death or disability, vested stock options may be exercised by the participant or participant’s beneficiary during the period ending four years after termination, provided the 10-year term of the grant has not expired.
The amounts shown in the table include the unvested values, as of the end of fiscal year 2021, that would immediately vest and be exercisable during the earlier of four years after termination or the 10-year term date of the grant. Outstanding stock option grants that carry exercise prices in excess of the value of our Common Stock as of end of fiscal year 2021 are not reflected in the table.
If, during the term of any outstanding grant, the executive engages in any business competitive with the Company or divulges or improperly uses any of the Company’s confidential or proprietary information, then the post-separation vesting and exercise rights will cease immediately and all outstanding vested and unvested options and any shares of Common Stock delivered under such grants will be automatically forfeited.
Retirement or Termination without Cause
The stock option agreements under the Company’s 2010 and 2019 EIPs for annual grants generally provide that if a participant satisfies a minimum age and years of service requirement and the participant’s employment is terminated by reason of retirement or termination without cause, stock options granted more than six months prior to termination will continue to vest and may be exercised during the period ending four years after termination, provided the 10-year term of the grant has not expired. Erik Nordstrom, Peter Nordstrom and Kenneth Worzel qualify for this continued vesting for their annual stock option grants as they have reached the minimum retirement age of 55 with at least 10 years of service. The one-time stock option grant made on August 27, 2020 to each of the NEOs does not provide for continued vesting upon retirement or termination without cause, so no amounts are shown for this grant.
The amounts shown in the table include the unvested values, as of the end of fiscal year 2021, that would continue to vest and be exercisable during the earlier of four years after termination or the 10-year term date of the grant. Outstanding stock option grants that carry exercise prices in excess of the value of our Common Stock as of end of fiscal year 2021 are not reflected in the table.
If, during the term of any outstanding grant, the executive engages in any business competitive with the Company or divulges or improperly uses any of the Company’s confidential or proprietary information, then the post-separation vesting and exercise rights will cease immediately and all outstanding vested and unvested options and any shares of Common Stock delivered under such grants will be automatically forfeited.
Qualifying Termination Following a Change in Control
The NEOs are not entitled to any payment or accelerated benefit upon a change in control with respect to their awards. However, under the 2010 and 2019 EIPs, a NEO will generally be entitled to accelerated vesting if the executive experiences a qualifying termination (termination by the Company without cause or termination by the executive for good reason) within 12 months following a change in control of the Company, unless the CPCC has acted to cause the NEO to receive, on account of the award, cash or other property being paid to shareholders in the change in control transaction, or the award is of a type which would continue in effect notwithstanding the occurrence of the change in control. Generally, a change in control occurs upon:
•the merger or consolidation of the Company with or into another entity;
•the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all the Company’s assets;
•a change in composition of 50% or more of the Board; or
•any transaction as a result of which any person is the “beneficial owner” of securities of the Company representing at least 30% of the total voting power of the Company’s outstanding voting securities.
The amounts shown in the table include the unvested values, as of the end of fiscal year 2021, that would immediately vest and be exercisable if the NEOs experienced a qualifying termination within 12 months following a change in control of the Company and the CPCC did not act to cause the NEOs to receive, on account of the award, cash or other property being paid to shareholders in the change in control transaction. Outstanding stock option grants that carry exercise prices in excess of the value of our Common Stock as of end of fiscal year 2021 are not reflected in the table.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 55 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Restricted Stock Units
Death or Disability
The RSU agreements under the 2010 and 2019 EIPs generally provide that if a participant’s employment is terminated by reason of death or disability, all unvested RSUs will immediately vest, with the exception of the one-time RSU grant made on August 26, 2019. The one-time RSU grant made on August 26, 2019 to Edmond Mesrobian provides that if his employment is terminated by reason of death or disability, a prorated number of the RSUs will immediately vest based on the number of full months employed.
The amounts shown in the table include the values, as of the end of fiscal year 2021, of unvested RSUs that would immediately vest.
If, during the term of any outstanding grant, the executive engages in any business competitive with the Company or divulges or improperly uses any of the Company’s confidential or proprietary information, then any unvested RSUs and any Common Stock delivered on vesting under such grants will be automatically forfeited.
Retirement or Termination without Cause
The RSU agreements for annual grants under the 2010 and 2019 EIPs generally provide that if a participant satisfies a minimum age and years of service requirement and the participant’s employment is terminated by reason of retirement or termination without cause, RSUs granted more than six months prior to termination will continue to vest.
The amounts shown in the table for Erik Nordstrom, Peter Nordstrom and Kenneth Worzel include the values, as of the end of fiscal year 2021, of unvested RSUs for their annual grants that would continue to vest after termination. These executives qualify for this continued vesting as of the end of the fiscal year since they have each reached the minimum retirement age of 55 with at least 10 years of service. The one-time RSU grant made on March 6, 2018 to Kenneth Worzel does not provide for continued vesting for termination by reason of retirement or without cause, so no amounts are shown for this grant.
If, during the term of any outstanding grant, the executive engages in any business competitive with the Company or divulges or improperly uses any of the Company’s confidential or proprietary information, then any unvested RSUs and any Common Stock delivered on vesting under such grants will be automatically forfeited.
Qualifying Termination Following a Change in Control
Under the 2010 and 2019 EIPs, the NEOs are not entitled to any payment or accelerated benefit upon a change in control with respect to their RSUs. However, a NEO will generally be entitled to accelerated vesting if the executive experiences a qualifying termination (termination by the Company without cause or termination by the executive for good reason) within 12 months following a change in control of the Company, unless the CPCC has acted to cause the NEO to receive, on account of the award, cash or other property being paid to shareholders in the change in control transaction, or the award is of a type which would continue in effect notwithstanding the occurrence of the change in control. See the Change in Control paragraph under Stock Options on page 55 for information about when a change in control occurs.
The amounts shown include the values, as of the end of fiscal year 2021, of unvested RSUs that would vest if the NEOs experienced a qualifying termination within 12 months following a change in control of the Company and the CPCC did not act to cause the NEO to receive, on account of the award, cash or other property being paid to shareholders in the change in control transaction.
(b) Vested SERP Benefit
The annual SERP benefit is paid upon retirement for the remaining life of the executive with a 50% survivor annuity paid to the surviving spouse or life partner for the remainder of their life after the executive’s death, as described in the Pension Benefits section on pages 51 and 52.
Death
The amounts shown are the present values of the 50% survivor annuity, payable in equal installments to the spouse or life partner of the executive, and would continue for the remaining lifetime of the spouse or life partner.
Disability
The amounts shown for Erik Nordstrom and Peter Nordstrom are the present values of their SERP benefits as they have met the minimum age of 58 with at least 10 years of service and would be eligible for their full retirement benefits under the SERP. The amounts shown would be paid in equal installments on the Company’s regular payroll dates, assuming the payments would begin as of the last day of fiscal year 2021. No amount is shown for Kenneth Worzel, the other eligible NEO, as he has not reached the normal retirement age of 58, which is the earliest eligibility for the SERP disability benefit.
Retirement or Termination without Cause
The amounts shown for Erik Nordstrom and Peter Nordstrom are the present values of their SERP benefits as they have met the minimum age of 58 with at least 10 years of service and would be eligible for their full retirement benefits under the SERP. The amount shown for Kenneth Worzel is the present value of his SERP benefit for early retirement, as he has met the minimum early retirement age of 53 with at least 10 years of service and would be eligible for early retirement with prior approval from the Board. The amounts payable to Erik Nordstrom, Peter Nordstrom and Kenneth Worzel would be paid in equal installments on the Company’s regular payroll dates, assuming the payments would begin as of the last day of fiscal year 2021.
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Qualifying Termination Following a Change in Control
No benefits are paid solely due to a change in control, although a change in control triggers immediate vesting and an obligation for the Company to fully fund accrued benefits through a trust. If an executive was separated from the Company after a change in control, a deferred annuity would be payable upon the executive reaching retirement age. If the separation occurred before the executive’s retirement age of 58, the benefit would be paid as an early retirement benefit at age 53, or the executive’s actual age, if older. In this case, the requirement for Board approval of the early retirement is waived.
The amounts shown for Erik Nordstrom and Peter Nordstrom are the present values of their SERP benefits as they have met the minimum age of 58 with at least 10 years of service and would be eligible for their full retirement benefits under the SERP. The amount shown for Kenneth Worzel is the present value of his SERP benefit for early retirement, as he has met the minimum early retirement age of 53 with at least 10 years of service and would be eligible for early retirement. The amounts payable to Erik Nordstrom, Peter Nordstrom and Kenneth Worzel would be paid in equal installments on the Company’s regular payroll dates, assuming the payments would begin as of the last day of fiscal year 2021.
The CPCC has discretion to discontinue payment of benefits under the SERP if the retired executive is found to have engaged in misconduct or in competitive behavior against the Company.
(c) Life Insurance Proceeds
The Company provides life insurance for the NEOs of approximately 1.25 times annual base salary. The amounts reported in the table represent the life insurance proceeds that would be payable if the NEOs had died as of the last day of the fiscal year. The premiums paid for the Company-provided life insurance are included in column (c) in the All Other Compensation in Fiscal Year 2021 table on page 44.
(d) Retiree Health Care Benefit
The Company provides continued health care coverage for the eligible NEOs if they separate from the Company after age 55 with at least 10 profit sharing years of service. These benefits include medical, behavioral health/substance abuse, vision, prescription drug and dental coverage. The NEOs and their spouses or registered domestic partners and eligible dependents would be covered under the retiree health plan, and the executive and the Company would continue to share in the cost of the insurance premium. Coverage and cost sharing would continue for the surviving spouse or registered domestic partner and eligible dependents after the executive’s death. Effective November 1, 2013, the retiree health plan was closed to new entrants.
The amounts in the table for the eligible NEOs are the present values of the health care cost that would be payable by the Company if they had separated on the last day of the fiscal year. Erik Nordstrom, Peter Nordstrom and Kenneth Worzel have met the minimum retirement age of 55 with at least 10 profit sharing years of service and would be eligible for retirement. Assumptions used in determining these amounts include a discount rate of 3.23% and the PRI2012 White Collar, Fully Generational Mortality Table with projection scale MP2021.
An executive who is terminated for cause, as determined by the Company in the exercise of its discretion in accordance with the Plan, is not eligible to receive the retiree health care benefit.
(e) Separation Benefit
Under the Nordstrom, Inc. Executive Severance Plan, Kenneth Worzel and Edmond Mesrobian are eligible to receive benefits upon involuntary termination of employment by the Company, not for cause. To be eligible to participate in the Plan upon involuntary termination, the eligible NEO must have signed a non-competition and non-solicitation agreement.
Erik Nordstrom and Peter Nordstrom are not eligible under the Plan. Anne Bramman has elected not to participate in the Plan. The benefits for eligible and participating employees include:
•lump sum cash payment for severance: 18 or 24 months of base salary for Executive Officers, depending on their roles. This is reduced by an amount equal to the participant’s gross monthly SERP benefit multiplied by the number of months used to calculate the severance payment, if applicable;
•lump sum cash payment for health coverage: the cost of the Company-paid portion of the employee’s currently elected health coverage for 12 months, unless the employee is eligible for the retiree health care benefit, as described in footnote (d), “Retiree Health Care Benefit”; and
•six months of outplacement services.
Kenneth Worzel’s estimated separation payment shown on the following page is reduced by an amount equal to his estimated gross monthly SERP benefit multiplied by the number of months used to calculate his separation payment. No amount is included for the Company-paid portion of medical benefits as he qualifies for retiree health care benefits. No amount is included for the Company-paid portion of medical benefits for Edmond Mesrobian as he is not participating in the Company’s medical benefit plans.
To be eligible to receive any benefits under the Nordstrom, Inc. Executive Severance Plan, the NEO must sign a release in which the executive agrees, among other things, not to disclose to anyone at any time any confidential information acquired during employment with the Company, and not to publish any statement, or instigate, assist or participate in the making or publication of any statement which is disparaging or detrimental in any way to the Company, except in each case as required by applicable law.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 57 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The potential separation benefits for the NEOs are shown below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | | Separation Payment ($) | | Company-Paid Portion of Medical Benefits ($) | | Cost of Outplacement Services ($) | | Total Separation Benefit ($) |
Erik B. Nordstrom | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Anne L. Bramman | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Peter E. Nordstrom | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Kenneth J. Worzel | | 1,160,298 | | | — | | | 4,200 | | | 1,164,498 | |
Edmond Mesrobian | | 1,600,000 | | | — | | | 4,200 | | | 1,604,200 | |
(f) Disability Insurance Benefit
The Company provides long-term disability insurance for the NEOs. The amount reported in the table for each NEO is the long-term disability benefit provided of up to $35,000 per month. The premiums for the Company-provided disability insurance are included in column (c) in the All Other Compensation in Fiscal Year 2021 table on page 44.
(g) Executive Management Bonus
The performance period under the EMBP is the fiscal year. Therefore, a termination event that occurred on the last day of the fiscal year would not result in any additional or accelerated benefits under this Plan. However, if an employee died, became disabled or retired (after having met certain age and years of service requirements) during the fiscal year, the CPCC would have the sole discretion to determine what amounts, if any, an executive would remain eligible to receive as a performance-based bonus award. Any bonus award would be prorated to reflect the period of service during the fiscal year.
Pay Ratio Disclosure
SEC rules require that U.S. publicly traded companies disclose the ratio of their PEO’s compensation to that of their median employee. Our PEO is our CEO, Erik Nordstrom.
For fiscal year 2021:
•the annual total compensation of Erik Nordstrom was $5,753,133; and
•the estimated median of the annual total compensation of all employees of our Company, other than Erik Nordstrom, was $26,479.
Based on this information, for 2021 the ratio of the annual total compensation of Erik Nordstrom, our Chief Executive Officer and PEO, to the median of the annual compensation of all employees was 217 to 1.
The SEC rules for identifying the median employee and calculating the pay ratio permit companies to use various methodologies and assumptions, to apply certain exclusions and to make reasonable estimates that reflect their employee population and compensation practices. As a result, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio that we have reported.
To identify the median employee, we used the total compensation as reported on the 2021 W-2 for all of our U.S. employees, excluding our PEO, and the Canadian equivalent T4 for all of our Canadian employees, who were employed by us on January 29, 2022, the last day of our fiscal year. We included full-time, part-time, seasonal and temporary employees and did not annualize the compensation for our permanent full-time and part-time employees who were not employed with us for the entire fiscal year. We applied a Canadian to U.S. dollar exchange rate to the compensation elements paid in Canadian currency. Similar to other large retail companies, a significant portion of our workforce is employed on a part-time and seasonal basis. As of the end of fiscal year 2021, approximately 37,000 of our 67,000 employees – or 55% of our workforce – were either part-time or seasonal.
After identifying the median employee, we calculated annual total compensation for the median employee using the same methodology we used for determining total compensation for our NEOs as shown in the 2021 Summary Compensation Table on page 43.
| | | | | |
PROPOSAL 3: | ADVISORY VOTE REGARDING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
The Board recommends a vote FOR this proposal.
The Company is providing shareholders with an advisory (nonbinding) vote on the compensation program of our NEOs as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. At the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, over 95% of the votes cast approved our Board’s recommendation to hold advisory votes on an annual basis.
At the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, over 90% of the votes cast were supportive of our compensation program. In light of this support of the compensation program for our NEOs, the CPCC continues to apply the same pay and benefits philosophy which underlies our pay-for-performance philosophy.
| | |
Compensation Program Highlights |
As described in the CD&A beginning on page 32, our NEOs are rewarded when defined performance milestones are achieved and when value is created for our shareholders. Our CPCC and Board believe that our compensation program is effective in implementing our executive compensation philosophy and establishing a solid link between compensation and shareholder interests. Highlights of our compensation program include the following:
•We deliver the majority of compensation through a pay-for-performance framework where incentives are based on achieving results. At least 70% of the value of the targeted compensation package for each of our NEOs is weighted toward pay for performance and variable compensation to reinforce our philosophy of compensating our executives when they and the Company are successful in ways that support shareholder interests.
•Each year, the CPCC establishes the performance-based bonus measures that focus executives on the most important Company objectives. In 2021, the CPCC maintained the same financial performance measures of Incentive Adjusted EBIT, which emphasizes the importance of earnings and its role in driving shareholder value, and Incentive Adjusted ROIC, which ensures our overall performance aligns directly with shareholder returns over the long term. For additional detail on our performance-based annual bonus program, see page 37.
•While the CPCC considers the 50th percentile (median) of our peer group as a reference, there is no specific percentage of target total direct compensation targeted by the CPCC other than to remain generally competitive with similarly situated peer companies. Target opportunities for individual pay elements vary by executive role based on scope of responsibilities and expected contributions.
•We maintain meaningful executive stock ownership guidelines so that our executives’ interests, as shareholders, are aligned with our broader shareholder base.
•We have an executive compensation clawback policy that applies to performance-based compensation.
•The CPCC has retained and directs an independent compensation consultant.
•We do not have employment agreements with our executives.
•We do not provide tax gross-ups, except those related to relocation expenses when an executive must move to assume Company responsibilities.
•We do not allow stock option grant repricing or backdating, nor do we grant options below 100% of fair market value.
•We have a derivative and hedging policy that prohibits Directors and Executive Officers (as well as other key insiders and their immediate families) from engaging in hedging transactions with respect to any equity securities of the Company held by them.
•We have restrictions on pledging of Common Stock.
We are asking our shareholders to indicate their support for our NEOs’ compensation as described in this Proxy Statement.
This proposal gives our shareholders the opportunity to express their views on the compensation of our NEOs. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our NEOs and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement. Accordingly, we ask our shareholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the 2022 Annual Meeting: “RESOLVED, that the Company’s shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s NEOs, as disclosed in the CD&A, the compensation tables and the related narrative disclosure in this Proxy Statement.”
Our Board has adopted a policy of annual executive compensation advisory votes. As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding on the Company. However, our CPCC and Board value the opinions of our shareholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions regarding the Company’s NEOs.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 59 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
The following table provides information as of the fiscal year ended January 29, 2022 about Common Stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options and rights that have been or may be granted to employees and members of the Board under all of the Company’s existing equity compensation plans.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Plan Category | Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (1) (#) | | Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (2) ($) | | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (excluding securities to be issued as reflected in column (1)) (3) (#) | |
Equity compensation plans approved by the Company’s shareholders (a) | 15,122,224 | | (b) | 39 | | | 20,706,533 | | (c) |
Equity compensation plans not approved by the Company’s shareholders (d) | 993 | | | 6 | | | — | | |
TOTAL | 15,123,217 | | | 39 | | | 20,706,533 | | |
(a)Consist of the 2010 and 2019 EIP and the ESPP. PSUs and RSUs do not have an exercise price and therefore have been excluded from the weighted average exercise price calculation in column (2).
(b)Includes 38,699 of deferred Director awards and 62,922 related to deferred PSUs.
(c)Includes 17,446,360 shares from the 2019 EIP, and 3,260,173 shares from the ESPP.
(d)Consist of plans created in connection with our subsidiaries.
OTHER MATTERS
The Board knows of no other matters that will be presented at the Annual Meeting. However, if any other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting or any convening or reconvening of the Annual Meeting upon an adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named as proxies to vote in accordance with their best judgment.
2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS INFORMATION
Requirements and Deadlines for Submission of Proxy Proposals, Nomination of Directors, and Other Business of Shareholders
If a shareholder wants the Company to include a shareholder proposal in our Proxy Statement for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Exchange Act, our Corporate Secretary must receive the proposal at our principal executive offices no later than December 8, 2022. Any such proposal must comply with all the requirements of Rule 14a-8.
If a shareholder intends to solicit proxies for a Director nominee in accordance with Rule 14a-19, our Corporate Secretary must receive notice of such intention at our executive offices no later than the close of business on March 19, 2023. Any such notice of intent to solicit proxies must comply with all the requirements of Rule 14a-19. The requirements of Rule 14a-19 are in addition to the requirements under our Bylaws with respect to advance notice of Director nominations.
Under our Bylaws, shareholders must follow certain procedures to nominate a person for election as a Director at an annual or special meeting, or to introduce an item of business at an annual meeting. Under these advance-notice procedures, shareholders must submit the proposed nominee or item of business by delivering a notice to the Corporate Secretary of the Company at our principal executive offices. We must receive notice as follows:
•We must receive notice of a shareholder’s intention to introduce a nomination or proposed item of business for an annual meeting not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days before the first anniversary of the prior year’s meeting. Assuming that the Annual Meeting is held on schedule, we must receive notice pertaining to the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders no earlier than January 18, 2023 and no later than February 17, 2023.
•However, if we hold the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on a date that is not within 30 days before or after such anniversary date, we must receive the notice no later than ten days after the earlier of the date we first provide notice of the meeting to shareholders or announce it publicly.
•If we hold a special meeting to elect Directors, we must receive a shareholder’s notice of intention to introduce a nomination no later than ten days following the day on which notice of the annual meeting was mailed to shareholders.
Our Bylaws provide that notice of a proposed nomination must include certain information about the shareholder and the nominee, as well as a written consent of the proposed nominee to serve if elected. A notice of a proposed item of business must include a description of and the reasons for bringing the proposed business to the meeting, any material interest of the shareholder in the business and certain other information about the shareholder. Any notice (other than a proposal pursuant to Rule 14a-8) that is received after the times specified herein for proposed items of business will be considered untimely under Rule 14a-4c under the Exchange Act. The persons named in the proxy for the meeting may exercise their discretionary voting power with respect to all such matters, including voting against them. All Director nominations and shareholder proposals, other than shareholder proposals made pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, must comply with the requirements of the Company’s Bylaws. You may obtain a copy of the Company’s Bylaws at no cost from the Company’s Corporate Secretary or on the Company’s Investor Relations Website. The contact information for the Company’s Corporate Secretary is on page 69.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
| | | | | |
1. | Why am I receiving these materials? |
We have made these materials available to you on the internet or, upon your request, delivered printed versions of these materials to you by mail, because you were a shareholder of the Company as of the Record Date, and were entitled to receive notice of the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and to vote on matters that will be presented at the Annual Meeting.
| | | | | |
2. | What items will be voted on at the Annual Meeting? |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Shareholders will vote on the following matters at the Annual Meeting: | Board Recommendation: | Page Reference (for more detail): |
| | | |
Proposal 1 | To elect nine Director nominees named in this Proxy Statement to the Board to serve until the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | FOR each Director Nominee | |
Proposal 2 | To ratify the appointment of Deloitte as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to serve for the fiscal year ending January 28, 2023 | FOR | |
Proposal 3 | To conduct an advisory vote regarding the compensation of our NEOs | FOR | |
Other | Such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof | | |
| | | | | |
3. | What is the date and time of the Annual Meeting? |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Date & Time: | May 18, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time | Virtual Meeting Access: | virtualshareholdermeeting.com/JWN2022 |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
This Proxy Statement was first mailed to shareholders on or about April 7, 2022. It is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board to be voted during the Annual Meeting for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice. Shareholders who execute proxies retain the right to revoke them at any time before the shares are voted by proxy during the meeting. A shareholder may revoke a proxy by delivering a signed statement to our Corporate Secretary prior to or during the Annual Meeting or by timely executing and delivering, by internet, telephone, or mail, another proxy dated as of a later date. | | | | | |
4. | How do I participate in the Meeting? |
This year’s Annual Meeting will be accessible through the internet. We have adopted a virtual format for our Annual Meeting to make participation accessible for shareholders from any geographic location with internet connectivity. We have worked to offer the same participation opportunities as were provided at the in-person portion of our past meetings while further enhancing the online experience available to all shareholders regardless of their location. The accompanying proxy materials include instructions on how to participate in the meeting and how you may vote your shares of Company stock.
You are entitled to participate in the Annual Meeting if you were a shareholder as of the close of business on the Record Date or hold a valid proxy for the meeting. To be admitted to the Annual Meeting at virtualshareholdermeeting.com/JWN2022, you must enter the 16-digit control number found next to the label “Control Number” for postal mail recipients or within the body of the email sending you the Proxy Statement.
Whether or not you participate in the Annual Meeting, it is important that your shares be part of the voting process. You may log on to proxyvote.com and enter your Control Number.
This year’s shareholder question and answer session will include questions submitted in advance of, and questions submitted live during, the Annual Meeting. You may submit a question in advance of the meeting at proxyvote.com after logging in with your Control Number. Questions may be submitted during the Annual Meeting through virtualshareholdermeeting.com/JWN2022. We will post questions and answers if applicable to Nordstrom’s business on the Nordstrom Investor Relations website shortly after the meeting.
We encourage you to access the Annual Meeting before it begins. Online check-in will start shortly before the meeting on May 18, 2022. Should you have any difficulty accessing the meeting, please call the numbers found at the top of the log-in page found at virtualshareholdermeeting.com/JWN2022 for technical assistance.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 65 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
| | | | | |
5. | Why did I receive a Notice instead of a full set of proxy materials? How can I access the proxy materials online? |
We are furnishing proxy materials to our shareholders primarily via the internet as the holders of a majority of our shares prefer that method. By doing so, we increase the convenience of our proxy materials, reduce the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting, and save costs. On or about April 7, 2022, we mailed a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to our shareholders who had not previously requested printed materials.
The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials contains instructions about how to access our proxy materials and vote online. If you would like to receive a paper copy of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. If you have previously chosen to receive our proxy materials electronically, you will receive access to these materials via email unless you elect otherwise.
| | | | | |
6. | What is a proxy statement, and what is a proxy? |
A proxy statement is a document that SEC rules require us to provide you when we ask you to vote on certain matters at a meeting of our shareholders or when we ask you to sign a proxy designating certain individuals to vote on those matters on your behalf. A proxy is your legal designation of another person to vote the shares you own at a meeting of our shareholders. By signing the proxy card we provide to you, you will designate Anne L. Bramman, our Chief Financial Officer, and Ann Munson Steines, our Chief Legal Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, as your proxies to vote your shares as you have directed during the Annual Meeting. Our Board is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares during the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. Nordstrom pays the cost of soliciting your proxy and reimburses brokers and others for forwarding you the Proxy Statement, proxy card or voting instruction form, 2021 Annual Report and Notice.
| | | | | |
7. | What is the difference between a shareholder of record and a street name shareholder? |
Many Company shareholders hold their shares through a stockbroker, bank or other nominee rather than directly in their own names. As summarized below, there are some distinctions between shares held as a shareholder of record and those held in street name.
•Shareholders of record: If your shares are registered directly in your name with the Company’s transfer agent, Computershare, you are considered the “shareholder of record” or a “registered shareholder,” and the Notice or proxy materials are being sent directly to you by the Company. As the shareholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to the Company or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting.
•Street name shareholders: If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank, trustee or nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and the Notice or proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record who is considered the shareholder of record. As the street name shareholder you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other holder of record on how to vote your shares and you are invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Your broker, bank, trustee or nominee is obligated to provide you with a voting instruction form for you to use.
We encourage you to vote in advance of the meeting on the internet or by telephone. It is convenient, and it saves us significant postage and processing costs. In addition, when you vote on the internet or by telephone, your vote is recorded immediately and there is no risk that postal delays will cause your vote to arrive late and therefore not be counted. The method by which you vote your proxy will not limit your right to vote at the Annual Meeting if you decide to attend the Annual Meeting virtually.
Shareholders of record: The internet and telephone voting procedures are designed to verify that you are a shareholder of record by using a control number and allowing you to confirm that your voting instructions have been properly recorded. Internet and telephone voting for shareholders of record are available 24 hours a day. You can vote by any of the following methods:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
You may vote in advance of the meeting, until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 17, 2022 using any of the following methods: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Online At proxyvote.com | | | Toll-free Phone Call 1-800-690-6903 | | | Mail Vote Processing c/o Broadridge 51 Mercedes Way Edgewood, NY 11717 | | | Scanned QR Code Using your mobile device |
Street name shareholders: You may vote by the method explained on the proxy card or the information you receive from the bank, broker or other record holder. If you are a street name shareholder, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the bank, broker or other holder of record to be able to vote in person at the Annual Meeting.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
Shareholders holding shares invested in the Company’s 401(k) Plan: If you participate in the Company’s 401(k) Plan, the number of shares of Common Stock in your account as of the Record Date are reflected on your proxy notice and may be voted as described above for shareholders of record. However, if your vote on those shares is not received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 15, 2022, then the Plan Trustee will vote those shares in the same proportion as all other 401(k) Plan shares that have been voted.
Shareholders holding shares purchased through the Company’s ESPP: If you hold Common Stock that you acquired through the Company’s ESPP, you are the beneficial owner of those shares and your shares may be voted as described above for street name shareholders.
| | | | | |
9. | What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice or package of proxy materials? |
This means that you have multiple accounts holding Nordstrom shares. These may include: accounts with our transfer agent, Computershare; shares held in the Nordstrom 401(k) Plan or purchased through the ESPP; and accounts with a broker, bank or other holder of record. Please vote all Notices, voting instruction forms and proxy cards that you receive to ensure that all of your shares are voted.
| | | | | |
10. | Why did multiple shareholders at my address only receive one Notice or package of proxy materials? |
SEC rules allow us to use a procedure called “householding” to deliver only one copy of our Notice, and for those shareholders that received a paper copy of proxy materials in the mail, one copy of our 2021 Annual Report, to multiple shareholders who share the same address (if they appear to be members of the same family) unless we have received contrary instructions from an affected shareholder. Shareholders who participate in householding will continue to receive proxy cards if they received a paper copy of proxy materials in the mail. By using the householding process, we reduce our printing costs, mailing costs and fees, and reduce the environmental impact of our annual meeting. If you are a shareholder, share an address and last name with one or more other shareholders, and would like to revoke your householding consent, or you are a shareholder eligible for householding and would like to participate, please contact Broadridge, either by calling toll free at (866) 540-7095 or by writing to Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717. You will be removed from the householding program within 30 days of receipt of the revocation of your consent. A number of brokerage firms have also instituted householding. If you hold your shares in street name, please contact your bank, broker or other holder of record to request information about householding.
| | | | | |
11. | What is a quorum and what is the voting requirement to approve each of the proposals? |
We will have a quorum and will be able to conduct the business of the Annual Meeting if at least 79,699,289 shares, a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock as of the Record Date, are present at the Annual Meeting, either in person or by proxy. Your shares will be counted toward the number needed for a quorum if you: (i) vote on the internet or by telephone; (ii) submit a valid proxy card or voting instruction form; or (iii) in the case of a shareholder of record, attend the Annual Meeting and vote your shares in person.
To elect Directors and adopt the other proposals, the following votes are required:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Proposal | Vote Required | | Discretionary Voting Allowed? |
Election of nine Directors to serve until the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Majority of Votes Cast | | No |
Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to serve for the 2023 fiscal year | Majority of Votes Cast | | Yes |
To conduct an advisory vote regarding the compensation of our NEOs | Majority of Votes Cast | | No |
Under Washington corporation law and our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, the approval of any corporate action taken at a shareholder meeting is based on votes cast. “Votes cast” means votes actually cast “for” or “against” a particular proposal, whether by proxy or in person. Broker nonvotes (broker nonvotes and discretionary voting are explained in the answers to Questions 13. and 14.) and abstentions are not considered “votes cast” and have no effect on the proposals.
•Election of Nine Directors; Majority Vote Policy: In the election of Directors, the Company has adopted a majority voting standard as described in more detail on page 12 under Director Elections. Because this is an uncontested election, an incumbent Director nominee will be elected if the votes cast “for” the nominee’s election exceed the votes cast “against” the nominee. If a Director nominee does not receive the requisite votes, that Director’s term will end on the date on which an individual is selected by the Board to fill the position held by such Director or 90 days after the date the election results are determined, whichever occurs first. You may vote “for,” “against” or “abstain” with respect to the election of each nominee.
•Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm: Under the Company’s Bylaws, the votes cast “for” must exceed the votes cast “against” to ratify the appointment of Deloitte as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 28, 2023. You may vote “for,” “against” or “abstain” on this proposal.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 67 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
•Advisory Vote Regarding Executive Compensation: The votes cast “for” must exceed the votes cast “against” to approve, on an advisory basis, the Company’s executive compensation program. You may vote “for,” “against” or “abstain” on this proposal.
The Board recommends a vote FOR each of the foregoing proposals.
| | | | | |
12. | Can I change my mind after I vote? |
Yes, if you vote by proxy, you may revoke that proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting. You may do this by:
•voting again on the internet or by telephone prior to the Annual Meeting; or
•signing another proxy card with a later date and mailing it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717, prior to the Annual Meeting; or
•delivering your proxy or casting a ballot during the meeting.
| | | | | |
13. | What if I do not return my proxy card or voting instruction form or do not provide voting instructions? |
•Shareholders of record: If you are a registered shareholder and do not vote by internet or phone or return your voted proxy card, your shares will not be voted. If you submit your proxy card with an unclear voting designation or no voting designation at all, your shares will be voted for the ratification of Deloitte, but not on any of the other proposals.
•Street name shareholders: If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held by a broker, your broker has discretionary voting authority under NYSE rules to vote your shares for the ratification of Deloitte even if the broker does not receive voting instructions from you. However, your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote on the election of Directors, the advisory vote regarding executive compensation or on any shareholder proposal without instructions from you, in which case a broker nonvote will occur. Since shares that constitute broker nonvotes will not be included in vote totals and have no effect on the outcome of the election of Directors, the advisory vote regarding executive compensation or any other matters properly brought before the meeting, it is important that you instruct your broker on how to vote your shares.
•Shareholders with shares invested in the Company’s 401(k) Plan: If your vote of shares held through the Company’s 401(k) Plan is not received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 15, 2022, then the Plan Trustee will vote your shares in the same proportion as shares that have been voted in the 401(k) Plan. If you submit your proxy card with an unclear voting designation or no voting designation at all, your shares will be voted by the Plan Trustee “for” all proposals. If any additional proposals are properly presented at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment thereof, the Plan Trustee will vote on the additional proposals in accordance with its discretion.
| | | | | |
14. | Will abstentions or broker nonvotes affect the voting results? |
If you abstain from voting on a proposal, or if a broker or bank indicates it does not have discretionary authority to vote on a proposal, the shares will be counted for the purpose of determining if a quorum is present, but will have no effect on the other proposals to be considered at the Annual Meeting since these actions do not represent votes cast by shareholders.
| | | | | |
15. | Who will count the vote? |
Broadridge was appointed by the Board to tabulate the vote and act as Inspector of Election. Information about Broadridge is available at broadridge.com. Proxies and ballots that identify the votes of individual shareholders are kept confidential from the Company’s management and Directors. Only Broadridge, as the proxy tabulator and the Inspector of Election, has access to the ballots, proxy forms and voting instructions. Broadridge will disclose information taken from the ballots, proxy forms and voting instructions only in the event of a proxy contest or as otherwise required by law.
| | | | | |
16. | Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting? |
We intend to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and publish final results on a current report on Form 8-K within four business days of the Annual Meeting. The Form 8-K will be available online under the “SEC Filings” tab at the Investor Relations Website.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
| | | | | |
17. | How can I communicate with the Board of Directors? |
Shareholders and other interested parties may communicate with Directors by contacting the Corporate Secretary’s Office at:
| | | | | | | | |
| Telephone: 206-303-2541 |
| | |
| E-mail: board@nordstrom.com |
| | |
| Mail: Nordstrom, Inc. 1617 Sixth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 Attn: Corporate Secretary |
The Corporate Secretary will relay the question or message to the specific Director with whom the shareholder or interested party wishes to communicate.
If no specific Director is requested, the Corporate Secretary will relay the question or message to the Chairman. Certain items that are unrelated to the duties and responsibilities of the Board, such as business solicitations, advertisements, junk mail and other mass mailings, will not be relayed to Directors.
The AFC has established procedures to respond to possible concerns about ethics and accounting-related practices. To report your concerns, you may use the Company’s confidential Whistleblower Hotline at:
| | | | | | | | |
| Telephone: 1-888-832-8358 |
| | |
| Internet: ethicspoint.com |
Your concerns will be investigated and communicated to the AFC, as necessary.
| | | | | |
18. | What if I have additional questions that are not addressed here? |
You may e-mail Investor Relations at InvRelations@Nordstrom.com, or call the Corporate Secretary’s Office at 206-303-2541.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 69 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
| | | | | |
APPENDIX A: | RECONCILIATION OF GAAP AND NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES |
Incentive Adjusted ROIC and Incentive Adjusted EBIT
We believe that Incentive Adjusted ROIC is a useful financial measure for investors in evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of the capital we have invested in our business to generate returns over time. In addition, we have incorporated it in our executive incentive measures and we believe it is an important indicator of shareholders’ return over the long term.
For 2021, 2020 and 2019, income statement activity for adjusted net operating profit and balance sheet amounts for average invested capital are measured under the Lease Standard and the remaining years disclosed are under the previous lease standard. Under the previous lease standard, we estimated the value of our operating leases as if they met the criteria for capital leases or we had purchased the properties. This provided additional supplemental information that estimated the investment in our operating leases. Estimated depreciation on capitalized operating leases and average estimated asset base of capitalized operating leases are not calculated in accordance with, nor an alternative for, GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for our results as reported under GAAP.
We define Incentive Adjusted ROIC as our adjusted net operating profit after tax divided by our average invested capital. Incentive Adjusted EBIT represents net earnings before income tax expense, interest expense and interest income, and contemplates non-operating related adjustments. These metrics are not measures of financial performance under GAAP and should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, return on assets, net earnings, total assets or other GAAP financial measures. Our method of calculating a non-GAAP financial measure may differ from other companies’ methods and therefore may not be comparable to those used by other companies. The financial measures calculated under GAAP which are most directly comparable to Incentive Adjusted EBIT and Incentive Adjusted ROIC are net earnings and return on assets. The following is a reconciliation of return on assets to Incentive Adjusted ROIC:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 12 Fiscal Months Ended |
($ in millions) | February 3, 2018 | February 2, 2019 | February 1, 2020 | January 30, 2021 | January 29, 2022 |
Net earnings (loss) | $ | 437 | $ | 564 | $ | 496 | $ | (690) | $ | 178 |
Add (Less): income tax expense (benefit) | 353 | 169 | 186 | (538) | 68 |
Add: interest expense, net | 136 | 104 | 102 | 181 | 246 |
EBIT | 926 | 837 | 784 | (1,047) | 492 |
Add (Less): non-operating related adjustments | 26 | 72 | 24 | — | (32) |
Add: interest income | 5 | 15 | 10 | 3 | 1 |
Add: operating lease interest(a) | — | — | 101 | 95 | 87 |
Add: rent expense, net | 250 | 251 | — | — | — |
Less: estimated depreciation on capitalized operating leases(b) | (133) | (134) | — | — | — |
Adjusted net operating profit (loss) | 1,074 | 1,041 | 919 | (949) | 548 |
(Less) Add: estimated income tax (expense) benefit(c) | (480) | (248) | (244) | 416 | (150) |
Adjusted net operating profit (loss) after tax | $ | 594 | $ | 793 | $ | 675 | $ | (533) | $ | 398 |
Average total assets | $ | 8,055 | $ | 8,282 | $ | 9,765 | $ | 9,718 | $ | 9,301 |
Add: average estimated asset base of capitalized operating leases(b) | 1,805 | 2,018 | — | — | — |
Less: average deferred property incentives and deferred rent liability | (644) | (616) | — | — | — |
Less: average deferred property incentives in excess of right-of-use assets(d) | — | — | (307) | (276) | (232) |
Less: average non-interest-bearing current liabilities | (3,261) | (3,479) | (3,439) | (3,138) | (3,352) |
Add: non-operating related adjustments | 3 | 4 | — | — | — |
Average invested capital | $ | 5,958 | $ | 6,209 | $ | 6,019 | $ | 6,304 | $ | 5,717 |
Return on assets | 5.4 | % | 6.8 | % | 5.1 | % | (7.1 | %) | 1.9 | % |
Incentive Adjusted ROIC | 10.0 | % | 12.8 | % | 11.2 | % | (8.5 | %) | 7.0 | % |
(a) We add back the operating lease interest to reflect how we manage our business. Operating lease interest is a component of operating lease cost recorded in occupancy costs.
(b) Capitalized operating leases is our best estimate of the asset base we would record for our leases that are classified as operating under the previous lease standard if they had met the criteria for a finance lease or we had purchased the property. The asset base for each quarter is calculated as the trailing four quarters of rent expense multiplied by eight, a commonly used method to estimate the asset base we would record for our capitalized operating leases.
(c) Estimated income tax (expense) benefit is calculated by multiplying the adjusted net operating profit (loss) by the effective tax rate for the trailing twelve month period. The effective tax rate is calculated by dividing income tax expense (benefit) by earnings (loss) before income taxes for the same trailing twelve month periods.
(d) For leases with property incentives that exceed the right-of-use assets, we reclassify the amount from assets to other current liabilities and other liabilities and reduce average total assets, as this better reflects how we manage our business.
APPENDIX A: RECONCILIATION OF GAAP AND NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
The following is a reconciliation of net earnings (loss) to Incentive Adjusted EBIT:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 12 Fiscal Months Ended |
($ in millions) | February 3, 2018 | February 2, 2019 | February 1, 2020 | January 30, 2021 | January 29, 2022 |
Net earnings (loss) | $ | 437 | $ | 564 | $ | 496 | $ | (690) | $ | 178 |
Add (Less): income tax expense (benefit) | 353 | 169 | 186 | (538) | 68 |
Add: interest expense, net | 136 | 104 | 102 | 181 | 246 |
EBIT | 926 | 837 | 784 | (1,047) | 492 |
Add: non-operating related and other adjustments(a) | 26 | 72 | 24 | — | 174 |
Incentive Adjusted EBIT | 952 | 909 | 808 | (1,047) | 666 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
(a) Beginning in the 12 fiscal months ended January 29, 2022, the Incentive Adjusted EBIT measure excludes certain performance-based compensation elements in order to be more reflective of business performance.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| A-2 | 2022 Proxy Statement | NORDSTROM, INC. | |
[This page intentionally left blank.]
[This page intentionally left blank.]