TBC
BANK GROUP PLC ("TBC Bank")
2Q AND 1H 2024 UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL RESULTS
Forward-looking statements
This document contains forward-looking statements; such
forward-looking statements contain known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other important factors, which may cause the
actual results, performance or achievements of TBC Bank Group PLC
("the Bank" or "the Group") to be materially different from any
future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by
such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are
based on numerous assumptions regarding the Bank's present and
future business strategies and the environment in which the Bank
will operate in the future. Important factors that, in the view of
the Bank, could cause actual results to differ materially from
those discussed in the forward-looking statements include, among
others: the achievement of anticipated levels of profitability;
growth, cost and recent acquisitions; the impact of competitive
pricing; the ability to obtain the necessary regulatory approvals
and licenses; the impact of developments in the Georgian and Uzbek
economies; the impact of Russia-Ukraine war; the political and
legal environment; financial risk management; and the impact of
general business and global economic conditions.
None of the future projections, expectations, estimates or
prospects in this document should be taken as forecasts or
promises, nor should they be taken as implying any indication,
assurance or guarantee that the assumptions on which such future
projections, expectations, estimates or prospects are based are
accurate or exhaustive or, in the case of the assumptions, entirely
covered in the document. These forward-looking statements speak
only as of the date they are made, and, subject to compliance with
applicable law and regulations, the Bank expressly disclaims any
obligation or undertaking to disseminate any updates or revisions
to any forward-looking statements contained in the document to
reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in
factors affecting those statements.
Certain financial information contained in this management
report, which is prepared on the basis of the Group's accounting
policies applied consistently from year to year, has been extracted
from the Group's unaudited management accounts and financial
statements. The areas in which the management accounts might differ
from the International Financial Reporting Standards and/or
generally accepted U.S. accounting principles could be significant;
you should consult your own professional advisors and/or conduct
your own due diligence for a complete and detailed understanding of
such differences and any implications they might have on the
relevant financial information contained in this presentation. Some
numerical figures included in this report have been subjected to
rounding adjustments. Accordingly, the numerical figures shown as
totals in certain tables might not be an arithmetic aggregation of
the figures that preceded them.
2Q and 1H 2024 consolidated financial results conference call
details
TBC Bank Group PLC ("TBC PLC") has
published its unaudited consolidated financial results for the 2Q
and 1H 2024 on Friday, 9 August 2024 at 7.00 AM BST. The management
team will host a conference call at 2.00 PM BST.
To participate in the conference
call live video webinar, please register using the following
link:
https://www.netroadshow.com/events/login?show=49b65e57&confId=69026
You will receive access details via email.
Contacts
Andrew Keeley
Director of Investor Relations
E-mail: AKeeley@tbcbank.com.ge
Tel: +44 (0) 7791
569834
Web: www.tbcbankgroup.com
|
Anna
Romelashvili
Head of Investor Relations
E-mail: ARomelashvili@tbcbank.com.ge
Tel: +(995) 577 205
290
Web: www.tbcbankgroup.com
|
Investor Relations Department
E-mail: IR@tbcbank.com.ge
Tel: +(995 32) 227 27
27
Web: www.tbcbankgroup.com
|
Table of contents
2Q and 1H 2024
unaudited consolidated financial results announcement
Interim management report
Financial highlights
Operational highlights
Letter from the Chief Executive
Officer
Economic overview
Unaudited consolidated financial results overview
for 2Q 2024
Unaudited consolidated financial results overview
for 1H 2024
Additional information
1)
Financial disclosures by business lines
2)
Glossary
3)
Ratio definitions and exchange rates
Risk management
Material Existing and Emerging
Risks
Statement of Directors'
Responsibilities
Condensed consolidated interim financial statements
(unaudited)
Independent Review Report
..…………………………………………………………………....……….…………… 50
Condensed Consolidated Interim
Statement of Financial Position……………………………………….….………...
52
Condensed Consolidated Interim
Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive
Income…….…...……….... 53
Condensed Consolidated Interim
Statement of Changes in Equity……………………....…………………..…….….
54
Condensed Consolidated Interim
Statement of Cash Flows…………………………………………..……….……… 55
Notes to the Condensed
Consolidated Interim Financial Statements……………………………………………..
…...
56
2Q and 1H 2024 unaudited
consolidated financial results
2Q 2024 profit of GEL 329
million, up by 12% YoY, with ROE at 27.1%.
1H 2024 profit of GEL 626
million, up by 14% YoY, with ROE at 26.0%.
European Union Market Abuse
Regulation EU 596/2014 requires TBC Bank Group PLC to disclose that
this announcement contains Inside Information, as defined in that
Regulation.
Financial highlights
Income statement
In
thousands of GEL
|
2Q'24
|
1Q'24
|
2Q'23
|
Change YoY
|
Change QoQ
|
1H'24
|
1H'23
|
Change YoY
|
Net interest income
|
458,111
|
442,844
|
399,338
|
14.7%
|
3.4%
|
900,955
|
766,129
|
17.6%
|
Net fee and commission
income
|
123,398
|
104,303
|
105,636
|
16.8%
|
18.3%
|
227,701
|
198,074
|
15.0%
|
Other non-interest income
|
96,922
|
70,833
|
81,792
|
18.5%
|
36.8%
|
167,755
|
154,802
|
8.4%
|
Total operating income
|
678,431
|
617,980
|
586,766
|
15.6%
|
9.8%
|
1,296,411
|
1,119,005
|
15.9%
|
Total credit loss
allowance
|
(31,565)
|
(45,131)
|
(33,934)
|
-7.0%
|
-30.1%
|
(76,696)
|
(87,102)
|
-11.9%
|
Operating expenses
|
(256,577)
|
(229,671)
|
(203,560)
|
26.0%
|
11.7%
|
(486,248)
|
(386,340)
|
25.9%
|
Profit before tax
|
390,289
|
343,178
|
349,272
|
11.7%
|
13.7%
|
733,467
|
645,563
|
13.6%
|
Income tax expense
|
(60,991)
|
(46,707)
|
(56,186)
|
8.6%
|
30.6%
|
(107,698)
|
(97,517)
|
10.4%
|
Profit for the period
|
329,298
|
296,471
|
293,086
|
12.4%
|
11.1%
|
625,769
|
548,046
|
14.2%
|
Balance sheet
In
thousands of GEL
|
Jun'24
|
Mar'24
|
Jun'23
|
Change YoY
|
Change QoQ
|
Total assets
|
35,780,415
|
33,261,535
|
28,878,826
|
23.9%
|
7.6%
|
Gross loans
|
24,128,807
|
22,545,189
|
19,360,689
|
24.6%
|
7.0%
|
Customer deposits
|
21,464,578
|
20,838,768
|
18,992,492
|
13.0%
|
3.0%
|
Total equity
|
5,079,760
|
4,853,916
|
4,331,529
|
17.3%
|
4.7%
|
Number of ordinary shares
|
55,361,967
|
55,393,664
|
55,140,216
|
0.4%
|
-0.1%
|
Key ratios
|
2Q'24
|
1Q'24
|
2Q'23
|
Change YoY
|
Change QoQ
|
1H'24
|
1H'23
|
Change YoY
|
ROE
|
27.1%
|
25.1%
|
28.1%
|
-1.0 pp
|
2.0 pp
|
26.0%
|
26.7%
|
-0.7 pp
|
ROA
|
3.8%
|
3.6%
|
4.2%
|
-0.4 pp
|
0.2 pp
|
3.7%
|
3.9%
|
-0.2 pp
|
NIM
|
6.4%
|
6.5%
|
6.8%
|
-0.4 pp
|
-0.1 pp
|
6.4%
|
6.6%
|
-0.2 pp
|
Cost to income
|
37.8%
|
37.2%
|
34.7%
|
3.1 pp
|
0.6 pp
|
37.5%
|
34.5%
|
3.0 pp
|
Cost of risk
|
0.5%
|
0.8%
|
0.6%
|
-0.1 pp
|
-0.3 pp
|
0.6%
|
0.9%
|
-0.3 pp
|
NPL to gross loans
|
2.0%
|
2.2%
|
2.1%
|
-0.1 pp
|
-0.2 pp
|
2.0%
|
2.1%
|
-0.1 pp
|
NPL provision coverage
ratio
|
75.5%
|
74.4%
|
89.3%
|
-13.8 pp
|
1.1 pp
|
75.5%
|
89.3%
|
-13.8 pp
|
Total NPL coverage ratio
|
141.9%
|
140.3%
|
153.7%
|
-11.8 pp
|
1.6 pp
|
141.9%
|
153.7%
|
-11.8 pp
|
Leverage (x)
|
7.0x
|
6.9x
|
6.7x
|
0.3x
|
0.1x
|
7.0x
|
6.7x
|
0.3x
|
EPS (GEL)
|
5.94
|
5.39
|
5.33
|
11.4%
|
10.2%
|
11.33
|
9.90
|
14.4%
|
Diluted EPS (GEL)
|
5.91
|
5.36
|
5.25
|
12.6%
|
10.3%
|
11.28
|
9.76
|
15.6%
|
BVPS (GEL)
|
90.32
|
86.11
|
78.21
|
15.5%
|
4.9%
|
90.32
|
78.21
|
15.5%
|
Georgia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CET 1 CAR
|
16.8%
|
16.6%
|
18.3%
|
-1.5 pp
|
0.2 pp
|
16.8%
|
18.3%
|
-1.5 pp
|
Tier 1 CAR
|
22.3%
|
18.8%
|
20.7%
|
1.6 pp
|
3.5 pp
|
22.3%
|
20.7%
|
1.6 pp
|
Total CAR
|
25.9%
|
21.5%
|
23.1%
|
2.8 pp
|
4.4 pp
|
25.9%
|
23.1%
|
2.8 pp
|
Uzbekistan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CET 1 CAR
|
12.6%
|
12.7%
|
17.8%
|
-5.2 pp
|
-0.1 pp
|
12.6%
|
17.8%
|
-5.2 pp
|
Tier 1 CAR
|
12.6%
|
12.7%
|
17.8%
|
-5.2 pp
|
-0.1 pp
|
12.6%
|
17.8%
|
-5.2 pp
|
Total CAR
|
16.4%
|
16.2%
|
18.6%
|
-2.2 pp
|
0.2 pp
|
16.4%
|
18.6%
|
-2.2 pp
|
Operational highlights
Customer base
In
thousands
|
Jun'24
|
Mar'24
|
Jun'23
|
Change YoY
|
Change QoQ
|
Total unique registered users
|
19,051
|
17,884
|
14,260
|
34%
|
7%
|
Georgia
|
3,360
|
3,317
|
3,157
|
6%
|
1%
|
Uzbekistan
|
15,691
|
14,567
|
11,103
|
41%
|
8%
|
Total monthly active customers
|
6,378
|
6,331
|
4,996
|
28%
|
1%
|
Georgia
|
1,633
|
1,615
|
1,550
|
5%
|
1%
|
Uzbekistan
|
4,745
|
4,716
|
3,446
|
38%
|
1%
|
Total digital monthly active users (digital
MAU)
|
5,695
|
5,646
|
4,295
|
33%
|
1%
|
Georgia
|
950
|
930
|
849
|
12%
|
2%
|
Uzbekistan
|
4,745
|
4,716
|
3,446
|
38%
|
1%
|
Total digital daily active users (digital
DAU)
|
1,884
|
1,760
|
1,434
|
31%
|
7%
|
Georgia
|
441
|
413
|
381
|
16%
|
7%
|
Uzbekistan
|
1,443
|
1,347
|
1,053
|
37%
|
7%
|
Digital DAU/MAU
|
33%
|
31%
|
33%
|
0 pp
|
2 pp
|
Georgia
|
46%
|
44%
|
45%
|
1 pp
|
2 pp
|
Uzbekistan
|
30%
|
29%
|
31%
|
-1 pp
|
1 pp
|
Uzbekistan - key highlights
In
thousands of GEL
|
Jun'24
|
Mar'24
|
Jun'23
|
Change YoY
|
Change QoQ
|
Gross loans and advances to
customers
|
1,122,400
|
928,553
|
526,843
|
113.0%
|
20.9%
|
Customer accounts
|
721,632
|
657,190
|
457,340
|
57.8%
|
9.8%
|
In
thousands of GEL
|
2Q'24
|
1Q'24
|
2Q'23
|
Change YoY
|
Change QoQ
|
1H'24
|
1H'23
|
Change YoY
|
Total operating income
|
91,081
|
74,045
|
48,291
|
88.6%
|
23.0%
|
165,126
|
88,373
|
86.9%
|
Profit for the period
|
23,779
|
18,437
|
12,505
|
90.2%
|
29.0%
|
42,216
|
25,212
|
67.4%
|
ROE, %
|
27.8%
|
23.7%
|
22.1%
|
5.7 pp
|
4.1 pp
|
25.7%
|
25.1%
|
0.6 pp
|
Letter from the Chief Executive
Officer[1]
I am pleased to announce that in
2Q 2024 we have continued to build on the strong momentum from 1Q
2024. Consequently, we achieved a record quarterly net profit of
GEL 329 million, marking a 12% increase compared to the previous
year, with a return on equity of 27.1%.
For 1H 2024, our net profit
reached GEL 626 million, up by 14% year-on-year, and our return on
equity was 26.0%. Notably, our digital banking ecosystem in
Uzbekistan contributed 7% of the Group's net profit, with its
return on equity reaching 25.7%. At the same time, our digital
monthly active users ("MAU") reached 5.7 million at the Group
level, up by 33% year-on-year. We have also added almost half a
million digital daily active users ("DAU") over the past year,
which is a great testament to the increasing breadth, quality and
convenience of digital financial services that our Group
offers.
2Q 2024 total operating
income up by 16% year-on-year
In 2Q 2024, our total operating
income increased by 16% year-on-year, reaching GEL 678 million.
This growth was driven by a 15% rise in net interest income and a
17% increase in net fee and commission income, while the Group's
net interest margin stood
at 6.4%.
Strong growth dynamics in
both Georgia and Uzbekistan
Our financial services in Georgia
continued their robust and profitable growth in 2Q 2024 with our
loan book increasing by 19% year-on-year on a constant currency
basis, with net profit up 9% year-on-year and 26.9% ROE.
During the same period, our deposits grew by 9% year-on-year on a
constant currency basis. At the same
time, our capital positions remained strong with CET1, Tier 1 and
Total Capital ratios standing at 16.8%, 22.3% and 25.9%,
respectively, significantly above the regulatory limits by 2.2 pp,
5.4 pp and 5.9 pp. This robust capital position was supported by
the issuance of USD 300 million AT1 capital notes in April
2024.
I am particularly pleased with the
performance of our digital banking ecosystem in Uzbekistan which
continues to deliver remarkable results. In 2Q 2024, Uzbekistan
generated GEL 91 million in total operating income and GEL 24
million in net profit, up 89% and 90% year-on-year, respectively,
and contributing 13% and 7% of the Group totals. Over the same
period, the ROE of our Uzbek operations amounted to 27.8%. In terms
of the balance sheet, TBC UZ's retail loans amounted to GEL 1.1
billion, up by 113% year-on-year and accounting for 44% of the
Group's consumer loans with a micro loan market
share[2]
of 15.8%. At the same time, TBC UZ retail
deposits reached GEL 722 million, up by 58% year-on-year,
representing 8% of the Group's retail deposits and capturing 3.3%
retail deposit market share3.
To support the rapid development
of our Uzbekistan business, we invested an additional USD 23
million into TBC UZ capital, while the European Bank for
Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and the International Finance
Corporation (IFC) each invested USD 7.6 million. These capital
injections provide a great platform for further growth of our core
lending products in 2H 2024 and beyond.
Interim dividend of GEL 2.55
per share declared
As we look ahead, we remain
confident in our ability to continue delivering a strong financial
performance and maintaining our leadership position in Georgia, as
well as capturing the immense growth opportunities in
Uzbekistan.
Finally, given our robust capital
position, I am pleased to report that the Board has declared an
interim dividend of GEL 2.55 per share, payable in November
2024.
Vakhtang
Butskhrikidze
CEO, TBC
Bank Group PLC
Economic overview
Georgia
Economic growth stronger than expected
Economic activity accelerated in
2Q 2024, with real GDP increasing by 9.5%, following 7.5% growth in
2023 and 8.4% in 1Q 2024. One important driver of this growth has
been tourism. Tourist revenues (excluding Russia, Ukraine and
Belarus) increased by 13.8% YoY in 2Q 2024, while overall tourism
including the migration impact, as estimated by the NBG, grew by
8.1%, given that migrants are gradually being counted as residents
by the central bank and hence excluded from the tourism sector.
Another positive driver has been remittances, which, according to
the balance of payments (BOP) data increased by 14.9%[3] YoY in 1Q 2024 and by 16.2% in 2Q 2024, based on
estimates.
On the other hand, the moderation
in external sector activity continued in 2Q 2024, negatively
affected by lower international commodity prices and reduced motor
car re-exports, while domestic exports performed slightly better
with a noticable recovery in ferro-alloys. Total exports of goods
denominated in US dollars decreased by 4.4% YoY in 2Q 2024, with
domestic exports reducing by 1.2%, while imports grew by 1.9%
compared to the previous year. FDI in 1Q 2024 decreased by 64.5%
YoY, however, this was primarily due to the base effect of one
large transaction in the manufacturing sector last year.
Fiscal consolidation continues in
2Q
The government remains focused on
fiscal consolidation by reducing the budget deficit relative to
GDP. Following a sizable surplus in 1Q 2024, the cumulative budget
balance[4] stood at 0.6% of GDP as of half
year 2024. The government targets 2.5% deficit for the full year,
similar to 2023.
Credit growth remains strong
Another driver of strong economic
growth, bank credit growth remains very robust, increasing from
17.2% YoY as of March 2024 to 17.7% as of June 2024, at constant
exchange rates[5]. At the same time, as low
and stable inflation persisted, YoY growth in real credit also
remained high at 15.2%. Credit growth remains stronger for legal
entities, increasing by 20.5% YoY, while lending to individuals was
up by 15.3% in 1Q 2024. The gradual dedollarization of bank lending
continues, wth the share of FX loans slightly decreasing to 44.4%
at the end of 2Q 2024, down from 45.0% at the end of 1Q
2024.
GEL recovering after brief weakening, while still low
inflation slowly approaches the NBG target
Having remained stable throughout
the first quarter and April 2024, worsened sentiment drove a slight
GEL depreciation in May and June, with the USD/GEL exchange rate
increasing from 2.7 at the end of March to 2.81 at the end of June
2024. However, while the NBG sold around USD 220 million on the FX
market in May and June to curb excess volatility, the GEL also
remained supported by strong foreign currency inflows, resulting in
improved sentiment and the GEL returning to 2.7 GEL per USD level
in mid-July.
CPI inflation is gradually approaching the NBG's 3% target, standing at
2.2% YoY in June, with relative
acceleration evident in domestic and service inflation measures.
Nevertheless, still low though increasing overall inflation led the
NBG to deliver only one 25 pp rate cut in the second quarter,
reducing the monetary policy rate (MPR) to 8.0%.
Uzbekistan
Continued strong economic performance
Strong expansion in economic activity was
also evident in Uzbekistan, with 6.6% real GDP growth in 2Q 2024,
following 6.2% growth in 1Q 2024. As for external trade, exports of
goods in 2Q decreased by 8.8%[6] YoY due to high
base effect of gold exports, while imports of goods increased by
15.1% boosted by higher energy imports. Retail credit growth
continued to decelerate, driven by cooling growth in non-mortgage
loans, although it still remained robust at 30%6 YoY at
the end of March, with mortgage credit expanding by 21% and
non-mortgage credit by 36%.
Annual inflation in Uzbekistan
increased from 8.0%6 in March to 10.6% in June 2024,
while the CBU kept its monetary policy rate unchanged at 14.0% (but
has subsequently reduced the rate to 13.5% in July). The UZS stood
at 12,5556 relative to the USD at the end of June 2024,
appreciating by around 0.5% in 2Q 2024, supported by slower credit
growth, the CBU's tight stance to bring inflation down and higher
gold prices.
Upgrading economic growth forecasts
Given the strong start to 2024 and
even stronger second quarter, we recently upgraded our forecast for
real GDP growth in Georgia to 7.4% (from 6.4%), while our
projection for Uzbekistan now stands at 6.1% (instead of
5.6%).
More
information on the Georgian economy and financial sector can be
found at www.tbccapital.ge.
Unaudited consolidated financial results overview for
2Q 2024
This statement provides a summary of the business and
financial trends for 2Q 2024 for TBC Bank Group plc and its
subsidiaries. The financial information and trends are
unaudited.
Please note that there might be slight differences in
previous periods' figures due to rounding.
Consolidated income statement and other comprehensive
income
In
thousands of GEL
|
2Q'24
|
1Q'24
|
2Q'23
|
Change YoY
|
Change QoQ
|
Interest income
|
878,549
|
840,354
|
711,820
|
23.4%
|
4.5%
|
Interest expense
|
(420,438)
|
(397,510)
|
(312,482)
|
34.5%
|
5.8%
|
Net
interest income
|
458,111
|
442,844
|
399,338
|
14.7%
|
3.4%
|
Fee and commission income
|
200,874
|
179,488
|
161,729
|
24.2%
|
11.9%
|
Fee and commission
expense
|
(77,476)
|
(75,185)
|
(56,093)
|
38.1%
|
3.0%
|
Net
fee and commission income
|
123,398
|
104,303
|
105,636
|
16.8%
|
18.3%
|
Net insurance income
|
9,100
|
7,803
|
6,184
|
47.2%
|
16.6%
|
Net gains from currency derivatives,
foreign currency operations and translation
|
85,647
|
61,469
|
61,127
|
40.1%
|
39.3%
|
Other operating income
|
2,029
|
1,602
|
14,213
|
-85.7%
|
26.7%
|
Share of profit/(loss) of
associates
|
146
|
(41)
|
268
|
-45.5%
|
NMF
|
Other operating non-interest income
|
96,922
|
70,833
|
81,792
|
18.5%
|
36.8%
|
Credit loss allowance for loans to
customers
|
(27,665)
|
(43,900)
|
(29,384)
|
-5.9%
|
-37.0%
|
Credit loss allowance for other
financial items and net impairment for non-financial
assets
|
(3,900)
|
(1,231)
|
(4,550)
|
-14.3%
|
NMF
|
Operating income after expected credit
losses
|
646,866
|
572,849
|
552,832
|
17.0%
|
12.9%
|
Staff costs
|
(135,653)
|
(126,563)
|
(108,724)
|
24.8%
|
7.2%
|
Depreciation and
amortisation
|
(35,614)
|
(34,108)
|
(29,587)
|
20.4%
|
4.4%
|
Administrative and other operating
expenses
|
(85,310)
|
(69,000)
|
(65,249)
|
30.7%
|
23.6%
|
Operating expenses
|
(256,577)
|
(229,671)
|
(203,560)
|
26.0%
|
11.7%
|
Profit before tax
|
390,289
|
343,178
|
349,272
|
11.7%
|
13.7%
|
Income tax expense
|
(60,991)
|
(46,707)
|
(56,186)
|
8.6%
|
30.6%
|
Profit for the period
|
329,298
|
296,471
|
293,086
|
12.4%
|
11.1%
|
Profit attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Shareholders of
TBCG
|
324,595
|
292,805
|
288,791
|
12.4%
|
10.9%
|
- Non-controlling
interest
|
4,703
|
3,666
|
4,295
|
9.5%
|
28.3%
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (expense)/income
for the period
|
(41,840)
|
7,676
|
7,178
|
NMF
|
NMF
|
Total comprehensive income for the period
|
287,458
|
304,147
|
300,264
|
-4.3%
|
-5.5%
|
Consolidated balance sheet
In
thousands of GEL
|
Jun'24
|
Mar'24
|
Change QoQ
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
3,688,366
|
3,147,389
|
17.2%
|
Due from other banks
|
20,742
|
24,296
|
-14.6%
|
Mandatory cash balances with the NBG
and the CBU
|
1,511,508
|
1,557,221
|
-2.9%
|
Loans and advances to
customers
|
23,757,851
|
22,183,529
|
7.1%
|
Investment securities measured at
fair value through other comprehensive income
|
4,110,036
|
3,875,799
|
6.0%
|
Bonds carried at amortised
cost
|
103,070
|
73,098
|
41.0%
|
Finance lease receivables
|
468,395
|
411,386
|
13.9%
|
Investment properties
|
14,506
|
15,921
|
-8.9%
|
Investments in associates
|
3,871
|
3,493
|
10.8%
|
Current income tax
prepayment
|
1,704
|
5,446
|
-68.7%
|
Deferred income tax asset
|
990
|
4,371
|
-77.4%
|
Other financial assets
|
306,561
|
311,427
|
-1.6%
|
Other assets
|
1,203,426
|
1,098,750
|
9.5%
|
Intangible assets
|
529,425
|
489,445
|
8.2%
|
Goodwill
|
59,964
|
59,964
|
0.0%
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
35,780,415
|
33,261,535
|
7.6%
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
Due to credit
institutions
|
4,846,332
|
3,702,517
|
30.9%
|
Customer accounts
|
21,464,578
|
20,838,768
|
3.0%
|
Other financial
liabilities
|
683,382
|
636,939
|
7.3%
|
Current income tax
liability
|
4,350
|
11,946
|
-63.6%
|
Deferred income tax
liability
|
52,882
|
53,315
|
-0.8%
|
Debt Securities in issue
|
1,849,800
|
1,501,651
|
23.2%
|
Other liabilities
|
226,562
|
236,942
|
-4.4%
|
Subordinated debt
|
1,152,841
|
1,050,191
|
9.8%
|
Redemption liability
|
419,928
|
375,350
|
11.9%
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
30,700,655
|
28,407,619
|
8.1%
|
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
Share capital
|
1,689
|
1,690
|
0.1%
|
Shares held by trust
|
(66,982)
|
(45,675)
|
46.6%
|
Share premium
|
292,734
|
295,605
|
-1.0%
|
Retained earnings
|
4,796,051
|
4,470,376
|
7.3%
|
Other reserves
|
(101,634)
|
(8,188)
|
NMF
|
Equity attributable to owners of the parent
|
4,921,858
|
4,713,808
|
4.4%
|
Non-controlling interest
|
157,902
|
140,108
|
12.7%
|
TOTAL EQUITY
|
5,079,760
|
4,853,916
|
4.7%
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
35,780,415
|
33,261,535
|
7.6%
|
Ratios
Ratios (based on monthly averages, where
applicable)
|
2Q'24
|
1Q'24
|
2Q'23
|
Profitability ratios:
|
|
|
|
ROE1
|
27.1%
|
25.1%
|
28.1%
|
ROA2
|
3.8%
|
3.6%
|
4.2%
|
Cost to
income3
|
37.8%
|
37.2%
|
34.7%
|
NIM4
|
6.4%
|
6.5%
|
6.8%
|
Loan yields5
|
12.6%
|
12.7%
|
12.8%
|
Deposit rates6
|
5.2%
|
5.4%
|
4.9%
|
Cost of
funding7
|
6.0%
|
6.0%
|
5.6%
|
Asset quality & portfolio
concentration:
|
|
|
|
Cost of risk9
|
0.5%
|
0.8%
|
0.6%
|
PAR 90 to gross
loans9
|
1.4%
|
1.2%
|
1.2%
|
NPLs to gross
loans10
|
2.0%
|
2.2%
|
2.1%
|
NPL provision
coverage11
|
75.5%
|
74.4%
|
89.3%
|
Total NPL
coverage12
|
141.9%
|
140.3%
|
153.7%
|
Credit loss level to gross
loans13
|
1.5%
|
1.6%
|
1.8%
|
Related party loans to gross
loans14
|
0.1%
|
0.1%
|
0.1%
|
Top 10 borrowers to total
portfolio15
|
5.9%
|
5.9%
|
5.8%
|
Top 20 borrowers to total
portfolio16
|
8.7%
|
8.8%
|
8.7%
|
Capital & liquidity positions:
|
|
|
|
Net loans to deposits plus IFI
funding17
|
100.0%
|
96.7%
|
90.6%
|
Leverage (x)18
|
7.0x
|
6.9x
|
6.7x
|
Georgia
|
|
|
|
Net stable funding
ratio19
|
118.2%
|
114.8%
|
129.8%
|
Liquidity coverage
ratio20
|
118.1%
|
114.6%
|
124.5%
|
CET 1 CAR21
|
16.8%
|
16.6%
|
18.3%
|
Tier 1 CAR22
|
22.3%
|
18.8%
|
20.7%
|
Total 1 CAR23
|
25.9%
|
21.5%
|
23.1%
|
Uzbekistan
|
|
|
|
CET 1 CAR24
|
12.6%
|
12.7%
|
17.8%
|
Tier 1 CAR25
|
12.6%
|
12.7%
|
17.8%
|
Total 1 CAR26
|
16.4%
|
16.2%
|
18.6%
|
Funding and liquidity in Georgia
|
Jun'24
|
Mar'24
|
Change QoQ
|
Minimum net stable funding ratio, as defined by the
NBG
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
0.0 pp
|
Net stable funding ratio as defined
by the NBG
|
118.2%
|
114.8%
|
3.4 pp
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum total liquidity coverage ratio, as defined by the
NBG
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
0.0 pp
|
Minimum LCR in GEL, as defined by the NBG
|
75%
|
75.0%
|
0.0 pp
|
Minimum LCR in FC, as defined by the NBG
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
0.0 pp
|
|
|
|
|
Total liquidity coverage ratio, as
defined by the NBG
|
118.1%
|
114.6%
|
3.5 pp
|
LCR in GEL, as defined by the
NBG
|
100.0%
|
114.8%
|
-14.8 pp
|
LCR in FC, as defined by the
NBG
|
129.5%
|
114.4%
|
15.1 pp
|
Regulatory capital
The quarterly increase in Tier 1
and total capital ratios was related to the issuance of USD 300
million AT1 capital notes in April 2024.
Georgia
In
thousands of GEL
|
Jun'24
|
Mar'24
|
Change QoQ
|
CET 1 capital
|
4,344,472
|
4,096,919
|
6.0%
|
Tier 1 capital
|
5,749,522
|
4,635,979
|
24.0%
|
Total capital
|
6,671,739
|
5,290,327
|
26.1%
|
Total risk-weighted
assets
|
25,791,645
|
24,607,358
|
4.8%
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum CET 1 ratio
|
14.6%
|
14.5%
|
0.1 pp
|
CET 1 capital adequacy
ratio
|
16.8%
|
16.6%
|
0.2 pp
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Tier 1 ratio
|
16.9%
|
16.8%
|
0.1 pp
|
Tier 1 capital adequacy
ratio
|
22.3%
|
18.8%
|
3.5 pp
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum total capital adequacy ratio
|
20.0%
|
19.9%
|
0.1 pp
|
Total capital adequacy
ratio
|
25.9%
|
21.5%
|
4.4 pp
|
Uzbekistan
TBC UZ received USD 11.7 million
capital injection in June 2024, which is reflected in the capital
adequacy ratios below. In July 2024, additional USD 26.5 million
was injected, which makes a total of USD 38.2 million
YTD.
|
Jun'24
|
Mar'24
|
Change QoQ
|
Minimum CET 1 ratio
|
8.0%
|
8.0%
|
0.0 pp
|
CET 1 capital adequacy
ratio
|
12.6%
|
12.7%
|
-0.1 pp
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Tier 1 ratio
|
10.0%
|
10.0%
|
0.0 pp
|
Tier 1 capital adequacy
ratio
|
12.6%
|
12.7%
|
-0.1 pp
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum total capital adequacy ratio
|
13.0%
|
13.0%
|
0.0 pp
|
Total capital adequacy
ratio
|
16.4%
|
16.2%
|
0.2 pp
|
Loan portfolio
As of 30 June 2024, the gross loan
portfolio reached GEL 24,128.8 million, up by 7.0% QoQ, or up by
4.9% QoQ on a constant currency basis.
In 2Q 2024, our Georgian financial
services loan portfolio increased by 6.4% on a QoQ basis and
reached GEL 22,983.0 million, with 4.4% QoQ growth on a constant
currency basis. Over the same period, our Uzbek portfolio increased
by 20.9% QoQ or 15.6% on a constant currency basis.
In
thousands of GEL
Gross loans and advances to customers
|
Jun'24
|
Mar'24
|
Change QoQ
|
Georgian financial services (Georgia FS)*
|
22,983,036
|
21,594,026
|
6.4%
|
Retail Georgia
|
8,137,555
|
7,682,858
|
5.9%
|
CIB Georgia
|
9,082,113
|
8,419,450
|
7.9%
|
MSME Georgia
|
5,778,382
|
5,506,736
|
4.9%
|
Uzbekistan
|
1,122,400
|
928,553
|
20.9%
|
Total gross loans and advances to
customers**
|
24,128,807
|
22,545,189
|
7.0%
|
* Georgian FS includes sub-segment eliminations
** Total gross
loans and advances to
customers include Azerbaijan loan
portfolio
|
2Q'24
|
1Q'24
|
2Q'23
|
Change YoY
|
Change QoQ
|
Loan yields
|
12.6%
|
12.7%
|
12.8%
|
-0.2 pp
|
-0.1 pp
|
GEL
|
13.7%
|
14.1%
|
15.4%
|
-1.7 pp
|
-0.4 pp
|
FC
|
8.5%
|
8.6%
|
8.4%
|
0.1 pp
|
-0.1 pp
|
UZS
|
44.2%
|
43.2%
|
43.0%
|
1.2 pp
|
1.0 pp
|
Georgia FS
|
11.1%
|
11.4%
|
12.0%
|
-0.9 pp
|
-0.3 pp
|
GEL
|
13.7%
|
14.1%
|
15.4%
|
-1.7 pp
|
-0.4 pp
|
FC
|
8.5%
|
8.6%
|
8.4%
|
0.1 pp
|
-0.1 pp
|
Uzbekistan
|
44.2%
|
43.2%
|
43.0%
|
1.2 pp
|
1.0 pp
|
UZS
|
44.2%
|
43.2%
|
43.0%
|
1.2 pp
|
1.0 pp
|
Total loan yields*
|
12.6%
|
12.7%
|
12.8%
|
-0.2 pp
|
-0.1 pp
|
*
Total loans yields include Azerbaijan
Loan portfolio quality
PAR
90
|
Jun'24
|
Mar'24
|
Change QoQ
|
Georgia FS*
|
1.3%
|
1.2%
|
0.1 pp
|
Retail Georgia
|
0.7%
|
0.8%
|
-0.1 pp
|
CIB Georgia
|
0.9%
|
0.7%
|
0.2 pp
|
MSME Georgia
|
2.9%
|
2.5%
|
0.4 pp
|
Uzbekistan
|
2.5%
|
2.1%
|
0.4 pp
|
Total PAR 90**
|
1.4%
|
1.2%
|
0.2 pp
|
* Georgian FS includes sub-segment
eliminations
** Total PAR 90 includes
Azerbaijan
In
thousands of GEL Non-performing Loans
(NPL)
|
Jun'24
|
Mar'24
|
Change QoQ
|
Georgia FS*
|
462,500
|
466,110
|
-0.8%
|
Retail Georgia
|
112,924
|
125,625
|
-10.1%
|
CIB Georgia
|
137,804
|
137,849
|
0.0%
|
MSME Georgia
|
211,772
|
202,636
|
4.5%
|
Uzbekistan
|
27,699
|
19,222
|
44.1%
|
Total non-performing loans**
|
491,068
|
486,058
|
1.0%
|
* Georgian FS includes sub-segment
eliminations
** Total non-performing
loans include Azerbaijan NPLs
NPL
to gross loans
|
Jun'24
|
Mar'24
|
Change QoQ
|
Georgia FS*
|
2.0%
|
2.2%
|
-0.2 pp
|
Retail Georgia
|
1.4%
|
1.6%
|
-0.2 pp
|
CIB Georgia
|
1.5%
|
1.6%
|
-0.1 pp
|
MSME Georgia
|
3.7%
|
3.7%
|
0.0 pp
|
Uzbekistan
|
2.5%
|
2.1%
|
0.4 pp
|
Total NPL to gross loans**
|
2.0%
|
2.2%
|
-0.2 pp
|
* Georgian FS includes sub-segment
eliminations
** Total NPL to gross loans
include Azerbaijan NPLs
|
Jun'24
|
Mar'24
|
NPL
Coverage
|
Provision
Coverage
|
Total
Coverage***
|
Provision
Coverage
|
Total
Coverage***
|
Georgia FS*
|
68.2%
|
138.4%
|
68.1%
|
136.6%
|
Retail Georgia
|
133.1%
|
195.6%
|
121.3%
|
183.6%
|
CIB Georgia
|
44.1%
|
108.8%
|
44.0%
|
105.2%
|
MSME Georgia
|
49.2%
|
127.2%
|
51.5%
|
128.8%
|
Uzbekistan
|
192.8%
|
192.8%
|
220.8%
|
220.8%
|
Total NPL coverage**
|
75.5%
|
141.9%
|
74.4%
|
140.3%
|
* Georgian FS includes
sub-segment eliminations
** Total NPL coverage
include Azerbaijan loans coverage
*** Total NPL coverage
ratio includes provision and collateral coverage
The Georgia FS cost of risk
improved both QoQ and YoY due to strong asset quality across all
segments as well as a one-off recovery in the amount of GEL 9.3
million.
Cost of risk (CoR)
|
2Q'24
|
1Q'24
|
2Q'23
|
Change YoY
|
Change QoQ
|
Georgia FS*
|
0.3%
|
0.7%
|
0.5%
|
-0.2 pp
|
-0.4 pp
|
Retail Georgia
|
0.4%
|
1.1%
|
0.5%
|
-0.1 pp
|
-0.7 pp
|
CIB Georgia
|
-0.1%
|
0.4%
|
0.1%
|
-0.2 pp
|
-0.5 pp
|
MSME Georgia
|
0.5%
|
0.7%
|
0.9%
|
-0.4 pp
|
-0.2 pp
|
Uzbekistan
|
5.5%
|
5.5%
|
6.6%
|
-1.1 pp
|
0.0 pp
|
Total cost of risk**
|
0.5%
|
0.8%
|
0.6%
|
-0.1 pp
|
-0.3 pp
|
* Georgian FS includes sub-segment
eliminations
** Total cost of risk
includes Azerbaijan CoR
Deposit portfolio
As of 30 June 2024, deposit
portfolio reached GEL 21,464.6 million, up by 3.0% QoQ, or up by
1.0% QoQ on a constant currency basis.
In 2Q 2024, our Georgia FS deposit
portfolio increased by 3.2% on a QoQ basis and reached GEL 20,867.5
million, with 1.3% QoQ growth on a constant currency basis. Over
the same period, our Uzbek portfolio increased by 9.8% QoQ or
5.0% on a
constant currency basis.
In
thousands of GEL
Customer accounts
|
Jun'24
|
Mar'24
|
Change QoQ
|
Georgia FS*
|
20,867,540
|
20,219,932
|
3.2%
|
Retail Georgia
|
7,830,406
|
7,498,419
|
4.4%
|
CIB Georgia
|
10,417,043
|
9,833,975
|
5.9%
|
MSME Georgia
|
1,960,795
|
1,869,140
|
4.9%
|
MOF
|
765,096
|
1,110,024
|
-31.1%
|
Uzbekistan
|
721,632
|
657,190
|
9.8%
|
Total customer accounts**
|
21,464,578
|
20,838,768
|
3.0%
|
* Georgian FS includes
sub-segment eliminations
** Total customer accounts
are adjusted for eliminations
|
2Q'24
|
1Q'24
|
2Q'23
|
Change YoY
|
Change QoQ
|
Deposit rates
|
5.2%
|
5.4%
|
4.9%
|
0.3 pp
|
-0.2 pp
|
GEL
|
7.6%
|
8.0%
|
8.3%
|
-0.7 pp
|
-0.4 pp
|
FC
|
1.3%
|
1.3%
|
0.8%
|
0.5 pp
|
0.0 pp
|
UZS
|
24.8%
|
25.5%
|
25.0%
|
-0.2 pp
|
-0.7 pp
|
Georgian financial services
|
4.6%
|
4.8%
|
4.5%
|
0.1 pp
|
-0.2 pp
|
GEL
|
7.6%
|
8.0%
|
8.4%
|
-0.8 pp
|
-0.4 pp
|
FC
|
1.3%
|
1.3%
|
0.8%
|
0.5 pp
|
0.0 pp
|
Uzbek business
|
24.8%
|
25.4%
|
24.9%
|
-0.1 pp
|
-0.6 pp
|
UZS
|
24.8%
|
25.5%
|
25.0%
|
-0.2 pp
|
-0.7 pp
|
FC
|
2.3%
|
3.7%
|
4.7%
|
-2.4 pp
|
-1.4 pp
|
Total deposit rates*
|
5.2%
|
5.4%
|
4.9%
|
0.3 pp
|
-0.2 pp
|
* Total deposits rates include MOF deposits
Unaudited consolidated financial results overview for
1H 2024
This statement provides a summary of the business and
financial trends for 1H 2024 for TBC Bank Group plc and its
subsidiaries. The financial information and trends are
unaudited.
Please note that there might be slight differences in
previous periods' figures due to rounding.
Consolidated income statement and other comprehensive
income
In
thousands of GEL
|
1H'24
|
1H'23
|
Change YoY
|
Interest income
|
1,718,903
|
1,383,970
|
24.2%
|
Interest expense
|
(817,948)
|
(617,841)
|
32.4%
|
Net
interest income
|
900,955
|
766,129
|
17.6%
|
Fee and commission income
|
380,362
|
313,530
|
21.3%
|
Fee and commission
expense
|
(152,661)
|
(115,456)
|
32.2%
|
Net
fee and commission income
|
227,701
|
198,074
|
15.0%
|
Net insurance income
|
16,903
|
12,402
|
36.3%
|
Net gains from currency derivatives,
foreign currency operations and translation
|
147,116
|
121,728
|
20.9%
|
Other operating income
|
3,631
|
20,130
|
-82.0%
|
Share of profit of
associates
|
105
|
542
|
-80.6%
|
Other operating non-interest income
|
167,755
|
154,802
|
8.4%
|
Credit loss allowance for loans to
customers
|
(71,565)
|
(79,424)
|
-9.9%
|
Credit loss allowance for other
financial items and net impairment for non-financial
assets
|
(5,131)
|
(7,678)
|
-33.2%
|
Operating income after expected credit and non-financial
asset impairment losses
|
1,219,715
|
1,031,903
|
18.2%
|
Staff costs
|
(262,216)
|
(212,150)
|
23.6%
|
Depreciation and
amortisation
|
(69,722)
|
(57,948)
|
20.3%
|
Administrative and other operating
expenses
|
(154,310)
|
(116,242)
|
32.7%
|
Operating expenses
|
(486,248)
|
(386,340)
|
25.9%
|
Profit before tax
|
733,467
|
645,563
|
13.6%
|
Income tax expense
|
(107,698)
|
(97,517)
|
10.4%
|
Profit for the period
|
625,769
|
548,046
|
14.2%
|
Profit attributable to:
|
|
|
|
- Shareholders of
TBCG
|
617,400
|
537,459
|
14.9%
|
- Non-controlling
interest
|
8,369
|
10,587
|
-21.0%
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (expense)/income
for the period
|
(34,164)
|
10,048
|
NMF
|
Total comprehensive income for the period
|
591,605
|
558,094
|
6.0%
|
Consolidated balance sheet
In
thousands of GEL
|
Jun'24
|
Jun'23
|
Change YoY
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
3,688,366
|
2,940,359
|
25.4%
|
Due from other banks
|
20,742
|
52,550
|
-60.5%
|
Mandatory cash balances with NBG and
the CBU
|
1,511,508
|
1,706,981
|
-11.5%
|
Loans and advances to
customers
|
23,757,851
|
19,002,657
|
25.0%
|
Investment securities measured at
fair value through other comprehensive income
|
4,110,036
|
2,942,679
|
39.7%
|
Bonds carried at amortised
cost
|
103,070
|
87,213
|
18.2%
|
Finance lease receivables
|
468,395
|
338,203
|
38.5%
|
Investment properties
|
14,506
|
20,741
|
-30.1%
|
Investments in associates
|
3,871
|
3,667
|
5.6%
|
Current income tax
prepayment
|
1,704
|
3,005
|
-43.3%
|
Deferred income tax asset
|
990
|
12,573
|
-92.1%
|
Other financial assets
|
306,561
|
266,969
|
14.8%
|
Other assets
|
1,203,426
|
1,022,797
|
17.7%
|
Intangible assets
|
529,425
|
418,468
|
26.5%
|
Goodwill
|
59,964
|
59,964
|
0.0%
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
35,780,415
|
28,878,826
|
23.9%
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
Due to credit
institutions
|
4,846,332
|
2,448,662
|
97.9%
|
Customer accounts
|
21,464,578
|
18,992,492
|
13.0%
|
Other financial
liabilities
|
683,382
|
387,595
|
76.3%
|
Current income tax
liability
|
4,350
|
27,559
|
-84.2%
|
Deferred income tax
liability
|
52,882
|
112,095
|
-52.8%
|
Debt Securities in issue
|
1,849,800
|
1,392,872
|
32.8%
|
Other liabilities
|
226,562
|
199,930
|
13.3%
|
Subordinated debt
|
1,152,841
|
639,048
|
80.4%
|
Redemption liability
|
419,928
|
347,044
|
21.0%
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
30,700,655
|
24,547,297
|
25.1%
|
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
Share capital
|
1,689
|
1,682
|
0.5%
|
Shares held by trust
|
(66,982)
|
(75,470)
|
-11.2%
|
Share premium
|
292,734
|
272,930
|
7.3%
|
Retained earnings
|
4,796,051
|
3,984,493
|
20.4%
|
Other reserves
|
(101,634)
|
40,656
|
NMF
|
Equity attributable to owners of the parent
|
4,921,858
|
4,224,291
|
16.5%
|
Non-controlling interest
|
157,902
|
107,238
|
47.2%
|
TOTAL EQUITY
|
5,079,760
|
4,331,529
|
17.3%
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
35,780,415
|
28,878,826
|
23.9%
|
Ratios
Ratios (based on monthly averages, where
applicable)
|
1H'24
|
1H'23
|
Profitability ratios:
|
|
|
ROE1
|
26.0%
|
26.7%
|
ROA2
|
3.7%
|
3.9%
|
Cost to
income3
|
37.5%
|
34.5%
|
NIM4
|
6.4%
|
6.6%
|
Loan yields5
|
12.6%
|
12.6%
|
Deposit rates6
|
5.3%
|
4.9%
|
Cost of
funding7
|
5.9%
|
5.5%
|
Asset quality & portfolio
concentration:
|
|
|
Cost of risk9
|
0.6%
|
0.9%
|
PAR 90 to gross
loans9
|
1.4%
|
1.2%
|
NPLs to gross
loans10
|
2.0%
|
2.1%
|
NPL provision
coverage11
|
75.5%
|
89.3%
|
Total NPL
coverage12
|
141.9%
|
153.7%
|
Credit loss level to gross
loans13
|
1.5%
|
1.8%
|
Related party loans to gross
loans14
|
0.1%
|
0.1%
|
Top 10 borrowers to total
portfolio15
|
5.9%
|
5.8%
|
Top 20 borrowers to total
portfolio16
|
8.7%
|
8.7%
|
Capital & liquidity positions:
|
|
|
Net loans to deposits plus IFI
funding17
|
100.0%
|
90.6%
|
Leverage (x)18
|
7.0x
|
6.7x
|
Georgia
|
|
|
Net stable funding
ratio19
|
118.2%
|
129.8%
|
Liquidity coverage
ratio20
|
118.1%
|
124.5%
|
CET 1 CAR21
|
16.8%
|
18.3%
|
Tier 1 CAR22
|
22.3%
|
20.7%
|
Total 1 CAR23
|
25.9%
|
23.1%
|
Uzbekistan
|
|
|
CET 1 CAR24
|
12.6%
|
17.8%
|
Tier 1 CAR25
|
12.6%
|
17.8%
|
Total 1 CAR26
|
16.4%
|
18.6%
|
Funding and liquidity in Georgia
|
Jun'24
|
Jun'23
|
Change YoY
|
Minimum net stable funding ratio, as defined by the
NBG
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
0.0 pp
|
Net stable funding ratio as defined
by the NBG
|
118.2%
|
129.8%
|
-11.6 pp
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum total liquidity coverage ratio, as defined by the
NBG
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
0.0 pp
|
Minimum LCR in GEL, as defined by the NBG
|
75%
|
75.0%
|
0.0 pp
|
Minimum LCR in FC, as defined by the NBG
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
0.0 pp
|
|
|
|
|
Total liquidity coverage ratio, as
defined by the NBG
|
118.1%
|
124.5%
|
-6.4 pp
|
LCR in GEL, as defined by the
NBG
|
100.0%
|
130.4%
|
-30.4 pp
|
LCR in FC, as defined by the
NBG
|
129.5%
|
119.2%
|
10.3 pp
|
Regulatory capital
The quarterly increase in Tier 1
and total capital ratios was related to the issuance of USD 300
million AT1 capital notes in April 2024.
Georgia
In
thousands of GEL
|
Jun'24
|
Jun'23
|
Change YoY
|
CET 1 capital
|
4,344,472
|
3,920,004
|
10.8%
|
Tier 1 capital
|
5,749,522
|
4,443,544
|
29.4%
|
Total capital
|
6,671,739
|
4,947,830
|
34.8%
|
Total risk-weighted
assets
|
25,791,645
|
21,452,808
|
20.2%
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum CET 1 ratio
|
14.6%
|
14.4%
|
0.2 pp
|
CET 1 capital adequacy
ratio
|
16.8%
|
18.3%
|
-1.5 pp
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Tier 1 ratio
|
16.9%
|
16.8%
|
0.1 pp
|
Tier 1 capital adequacy
ratio
|
22.3%
|
20.7%
|
1.6 pp
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum total capital adequacy ratio
|
20.0%
|
19.9%
|
0.1 pp
|
Total capital adequacy
ratio
|
25.9%
|
23.1%
|
2.8 pp
|
Uzbekistan
The YoY decrease in our capital
ratios for Uzbek Bank was driven by the rapid growth in the loan
book.
TBC UZ received USD 11.7 million
capital injection in June 2024, which is reflected in the capital
adequacy ratios below. In July 2024, additional USD 26.5 million
was injected, which makes a total of USD 38.2 million
YTD.
|
Jun'24
|
Jun'23
|
Change YoY
|
Minimum CET 1 ratio
|
8.0%
|
8.0%
|
0.0 pp
|
CET 1 capital adequacy
ratio
|
12.6%
|
17.8%
|
-5.2 pp
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Tier 1 ratio
|
10.0%
|
10.0%
|
0.0 pp
|
Tier 1 capital adequacy
ratio
|
12.6%
|
17.8%
|
-5.2 pp
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum total capital adequacy ratio
|
13.0%
|
13.0%
|
0.0 pp
|
Total capital adequacy
ratio
|
16.4%
|
18.6%
|
-2.2 pp
|
Loan portfolio
As of 30 June 2024, the gross loan
portfolio reached GEL 24,128.8 million, up by 24.6% YoY, or up by
21.2% YoY on a constant currency basis.
In 1H 2024, our Georgia FS loan
portfolio increased by 22.1% on a YoY and reached GEL 22,983.0
million, with 18.5% YoY growth on a constant currency basis. Over
the same period, our Uzbek portfolio increased by 113.0% or 116.9%
on a constant currency basis.
In
thousands of GEL
Gross loans and advances to customers
|
Jun'24
|
Jun'23
|
Change YoY
|
Georgian financial services (Georgia FS)*
|
22,983,036
|
18,816,052
|
22.1%
|
Retail Georgia
|
8,137,555
|
6,945,911
|
17.2%
|
CIB Georgia
|
9,082,113
|
6,928,632
|
31.1%
|
MSME Georgia
|
5,778,382
|
4,949,878
|
16.7%
|
Uzbekistan
|
1,122,400
|
526,843
|
113.0%
|
Total gross loans and advances to
customers**
|
24,128,807
|
19,360,689
|
24.6%
|
* Georgian FS includes sub-segment eliminations
** Total gross
loans and advances to
customers include Azerbaijan loan
portfolio
|
1H'24
|
1H'23
|
Change YoY
|
Loan yields
|
12.6%
|
12.6%
|
0.0 pp
|
GEL
|
13.9%
|
15.2%
|
-1.3 pp
|
FC
|
8.6%
|
8.3%
|
0.3 pp
|
UZS
|
43.7%
|
43.1%
|
0.6 pp
|
Georgia FS
|
11.3%
|
11.9%
|
-0.6 pp
|
GEL
|
13.9%
|
15.2%
|
-1.3 pp
|
FC
|
8.5%
|
8.3%
|
0.2 pp
|
Uzbekistan
|
43.7%
|
43.1%
|
0.6 pp
|
UZS
|
43.7%
|
43.1%
|
0.6 pp
|
Total loan yields*
|
12.6%
|
12.6%
|
0.0 pp
|
*
Total loans yields include Azerbaijan
Loan portfolio quality
PAR
90
|
Jun'24
|
Jun'23
|
Change YoY
|
Georgia FS*
|
1.3%
|
1.1%
|
0.2 pp
|
Retail Georgia
|
0.7%
|
0.9%
|
-0.2 pp
|
CIB Georgia
|
0.9%
|
0.6%
|
0.3 pp
|
MSME Georgia
|
2.9%
|
2.3%
|
0.6 pp
|
Uzbekistan
|
2.5%
|
2.2%
|
0.3 pp
|
Total PAR 90**
|
1.4%
|
1.2%
|
0.2 pp
|
* Georgian FS includes sub-segment
eliminations
** Total PAR 90 includes
Azerbaijan
In
thousands of GEL Non-performing Loans
(NPL)
|
Jun'24
|
Jun'23
|
Change YoY
|
Georgia FS*
|
462,500
|
387,626
|
19.3%
|
Retail Georgia
|
112,924
|
127,833
|
-11.7%
|
CIB Georgia
|
137,804
|
98,374
|
40.1%
|
MSME Georgia
|
211,772
|
161,419
|
31.2%
|
Uzbekistan
|
27,699
|
11,646
|
137.8%
|
Total non-performing loans**
|
491,068
|
400,989
|
22.5%
|
* Georgian FS includes sub-segment
eliminations
** Total non-performing
loans include Azerbaijan NPLs
NPL
to gross loans
|
Jun'24
|
Jun'23
|
Change YoY
|
Georgia FS*
|
2.0%
|
2.1%
|
-0.1 pp
|
Retail Georgia
|
1.4%
|
1.8%
|
-0.4 pp
|
CIB Georgia
|
1.5%
|
1.4%
|
0.1 pp
|
MSME Georgia
|
3.7%
|
3.3%
|
0.4 pp
|
Uzbekistan
|
2.5%
|
2.2%
|
0.3 pp
|
Total NPL to gross loans**
|
2.0%
|
2.1%
|
-0.1 pp
|
* Georgian FS includes sub-segment
eliminations
** Total NPL to gross loans
include Azerbaijan NPLs
|
Jun'24
|
Jun'23
|
NPL
Coverage
|
Provision
Coverage
|
Total
Coverage***
|
Provision
Coverage
|
Total
Coverage***
|
Georgia FS*
|
68.2%
|
138.4%
|
85.3%
|
150.9%
|
Retail Georgia
|
133.1%
|
195.6%
|
141.8%
|
192.4%
|
CIB Georgia
|
44.1%
|
108.8%
|
49.4%
|
110.5%
|
MSME Georgia
|
49.2%
|
127.2%
|
62.6%
|
142.7%
|
Uzbekistan
|
192.8%
|
192.8%
|
180.0%
|
180.0%
|
Total NPL coverage**
|
75.5%
|
141.9%
|
89.3%
|
153.7%
|
* Georgian FS includes
sub-segment eliminations
** Total NPL coverage
include Azerbaijan loans coverage
*** Total NPL coverage
ratio includes provision and collateral coverage
In the first half of 2024, Georgia
FS cost of risk improved YoY mainly due to strong asset quality
across retail and micro sub-segments as well as a one-off recovery
in the amount of GEL 9.3 million.
Cost of risk (CoR)
|
1H'24
|
1H'23
|
Change YoY
|
Georgia FS*
|
0.5%
|
0.8%
|
-0.3 pp
|
Retail Georgia
|
0.8%
|
1.0%
|
-0.2 pp
|
CIB Georgia
|
0.1%
|
0.0%
|
0.1 pp
|
MSME Georgia
|
0.6%
|
1.5%
|
-0.9 pp
|
Uzbekistan
|
5.5%
|
6.1%
|
-0.6 pp
|
Total cost of risk**
|
0.6%
|
0.9%
|
-0.3 pp
|
* Georgian FS includes sub-segment
eliminations
** Total cost of risk
includes Azerbaijan CoR
Deposit portfolio
As of 30 June 2024, deposit
portfolio reached GEL 21,464.6 million, up by 13.0% YoY, or up by
9.7% YoY on a constant currency basis.
In 1H 2024, our Georgia FS deposit
portfolio increased by 12.0% on a YoY and reached GEL 20,867.5
million, with 8.5% YoY growth on a constant currency basis. Over
the same period, our Uzbek portfolio increased by 57.8% YoY or
60.6% on a constant currency basis.
In
thousands of GEL
Customer accounts
|
Jun'24
|
Jun'23
|
Change YoY
|
Georgia FS*
|
20,867,540
|
18,639,911
|
12.0%
|
Retail Georgia
|
7,830,406
|
6,985,211
|
12.1%
|
CIB Georgia
|
10,417,043
|
9,144,331
|
13.9%
|
MSME Georgia
|
1,960,795
|
1,641,639
|
19.4%
|
MOF
|
765,096
|
967,133
|
-20.9%
|
Uzbekistan
|
721,632
|
457,340
|
57.8%
|
Total customer accounts**
|
21,464,578
|
18,992,492
|
13.0%
|
* Georgian FS includes
sub-segment eliminations
** Total customer accounts
are adjusted for eliminations
|
1H'24
|
1H'23
|
Change YoY
|
Deposit rates
|
5.3%
|
4.9%
|
0.4 pp
|
GEL
|
7.8%
|
8.5%
|
-0.7 pp
|
FC
|
1.3%
|
0.7%
|
0.6 pp
|
UZS
|
25.2%
|
25.1%
|
0.1 pp
|
Georgian financial services
|
4.7%
|
4.5%
|
0.2 pp
|
GEL
|
7.8%
|
8.6%
|
-0.8 pp
|
FC
|
1.3%
|
0.8%
|
0.5 pp
|
Uzbek business
|
25.1%
|
25.0%
|
0.1 pp
|
UZS
|
25.2%
|
25.1%
|
0.1pp
|
FC
|
2.9%
|
4.8%
|
-1.9 pp
|
Total deposit rates*
|
5.3%
|
4.9%
|
0.4 pp
|
* Total deposits rates include MOF deposits
Additional information
1) Financial
disclosures by business lines
Business line definitions
The operating segments are defined
as follows:
· Georgian financial services
(GFS) - include JSC TBC Bank with
its Georgian subsidiaries and JSC TBC Insurance with its
subsidiary. The Georgia financial service segment consists of three
major business sub-segments, while the treasury, leasing and
insurance businesses are combined into the corporate and other
sub-segments:
o Corporate and investment
banking (CIB) - a legal
entity/group of affiliated entities with an annual revenue
exceeding GEL 20 million or which has been granted facilities of
more than GEL 7.5 million. Some other business customers may also
be assigned to the CIB segment or transferred to the micro, small
and medium enterprises segment on a discretionary basis. In
addition, CIB includes Wealth Management private banking services
to high-net-worth individuals with a threshold of USD 250,000 on
assets under management (AUM), as well as on discretionary
basis;
o Retail
- non-business individual customers;
o Micro, small and medium
enterprises (MSME) - business
customers who are not included in the CIB sub-segment.
· Uzbekistan
- TBC Bank Uzbekistan with respective
subsidiaries and Payme (Inspired LLC).
· Other
- includes non-material or non-financial
subsidiaries of the group and intra-group eliminations.
Georgian financial
services
Profit and loss statement
In
thousands of GEL
|
2Q'24
|
1Q'24
|
2Q'23
|
Change YoY
|
Change QoQ
|
1H'24
|
1H'23
|
Change YoY
|
Interest income
|
752,671
|
736,833
|
653,209
|
15.2%
|
2.1%
|
1,489,504
|
1,277,525
|
16.6%
|
Interest expense
|
(364,481)
|
(351,165)
|
(285,241)
|
27.8%
|
3.8%
|
(715,646)
|
(565,246)
|
26.6%
|
Net
interest income
|
388,190
|
385,668
|
367,968
|
5.5%
|
0.7%
|
773,858
|
712,279
|
8.6%
|
Fee and commission income
|
164,483
|
148,492
|
136,481
|
20.5%
|
10.8%
|
312,975
|
266,221
|
17.6%
|
Fee and commission
expense
|
(66,562)
|
(67,249)
|
(49,501)
|
34.5%
|
-1.0%
|
(133,811)
|
(104,820)
|
27.7%
|
Net
fee and commission income
|
97,921
|
81,243
|
86,980
|
12.6%
|
20.5%
|
179,164
|
161,401
|
11.0%
|
Net insurance income
|
9,290
|
7,976
|
6,362
|
46.0%
|
16.5%
|
17,266
|
12,760
|
35.3%
|
Net gains from currency derivatives,
foreign currency operations and translation
|
88,170
|
64,629
|
70,405
|
25.2%
|
36.4%
|
152,799
|
133,319
|
14.6%
|
Other operating income
|
1,917
|
1,552
|
11,344
|
-83.1%
|
23.5%
|
3,469
|
16,233
|
-78.6%
|
Share of profit/(loss) of
associates
|
146
|
(41)
|
268
|
-45.5%
|
NMF
|
105
|
542
|
-80.6%
|
Other operating non-interest income
|
99,523
|
74,116
|
88,379
|
12.6%
|
34.3%
|
173,639
|
162,854
|
6.6%
|
Credit loss allowance for loans to
customers
|
(14,103)
|
(36,825)
|
(22,054)
|
-36.1%
|
-61.7%
|
(50,928)
|
(67,252)
|
-24.3%
|
Credit loss allowance for other
financial items and net impairment for non-financial
assets
|
(2,792)
|
(590)
|
(3,763)
|
-25.8%
|
NMF
|
(3,382)
|
(5,876)
|
-42.4%
|
Operating income after expected credit and non-financial
asset impairment losses
|
568,739
|
503,612
|
517,510
|
9.9%
|
12.9%
|
1,072,351
|
963,406
|
11.3%
|
Staff costs
|
(105,855)
|
(101,240)
|
(90,862)
|
16.5%
|
4.6%
|
(207,095)
|
(177,469)
|
16.7%
|
Depreciation and
amortisation
|
(30,013)
|
(29,265)
|
(25,706)
|
16.8%
|
2.6%
|
(59,278)
|
(50,293)
|
17.9%
|
Administrative and other operating
expenses
|
(51,998)
|
(44,764)
|
(47,538)
|
9.4%
|
16.2%
|
(96,762)
|
(86,412)
|
12.0%
|
Operating expenses
|
(187,866)
|
(175,269)
|
(164,106)
|
14.5%
|
7.2%
|
(363,135)
|
(314,174)
|
15.6%
|
Profit before tax
|
380,873
|
328,343
|
353,404
|
7.8%
|
16.0%
|
709,216
|
649,232
|
9.2%
|
Income tax expense
|
(57,166)
|
(43,704)
|
(54,942)
|
4.0%
|
30.8%
|
(100,870)
|
(95,958)
|
5.1%
|
Profit for the period
|
323,707
|
284,639
|
298,462
|
8.5%
|
13.7%
|
608,346
|
553,274
|
10.0%
|
Balance sheet highlights
In
thousands of GEL
|
Jun'24
|
Mar'24
|
Jun'23
|
Change YoY
|
Change QoQ
|
Cash & NBG mandatory
reserves
|
5,000,618
|
4,521,806
|
4,569,805
|
9.4%
|
10.6%
|
Due from other banks
|
20,708
|
24,268
|
52,523
|
-60.6%
|
-14.7%
|
Loans and advances to
customers
|
22,667,567
|
21,276,764
|
18,485,251
|
22.6%
|
6.5%
|
Investment securities measured at
fair value through OCI
|
4,110,036
|
3,875,799
|
2,942,679
|
39.7%
|
6.0%
|
Intangible assets and
Goodwill
|
406,942
|
396,070
|
358,114
|
13.6%
|
2.7%
|
Other assets
|
1,877,077
|
1,753,261
|
1,618,366
|
16.0%
|
7.1%
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
34,082,948
|
31,847,968
|
28,026,738
|
21.6%
|
7.0%
|
Due to credit
institutions
|
4,675,711
|
3,601,828
|
2,417,293
|
93.4%
|
29.8%
|
Customer accounts
|
20,867,540
|
20,219,932
|
18,639,911
|
12.0%
|
3.2%
|
Subordinated debt and debt
securities in issue
|
2,682,703
|
2,337,185
|
1,862,767
|
44.0%
|
14.8%
|
Other liabilities
|
902,091
|
972,875
|
665,864
|
35.5%
|
-7.3%
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
29,128,045
|
27,131,820
|
23,585,835
|
23.5%
|
7.4%
|
Equity attributable to
shareholders
|
4,954,687
|
4,715,946
|
4,440,718
|
11.6%
|
5.1%
|
Non-controlling interest
|
216
|
202
|
185
|
16.8%
|
6.9%
|
TOTAL EQUITY
|
4,954,903
|
4,716,148
|
4,440,903
|
11.6%
|
5.1%
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
34,082,948
|
31,847,968
|
28,026,738
|
21.6%
|
7.0%
|
Key ratios
Georgian financial
services
|
2Q'24
|
1Q'24
|
2Q'23
|
Change YoY
|
Change QoQ
|
1H'24
|
1H'23
|
Change YoY
|
Profitability ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE1
|
26.9%
|
24.0%
|
27.8%
|
-0.9 pp
|
2.9 pp
|
25.4%
|
25.7%
|
-0.3 pp
|
ROA2
|
3.9%
|
3.6%
|
4.5%
|
-0.6 pp
|
0.3 pp
|
3.8%
|
4.1%
|
-0.3 pp
|
Cost to
income3
|
32.1%
|
32.4%
|
30.2%
|
1.9 pp
|
-0.3 pp
|
32.2%
|
30.3%
|
1.9 pp
|
NIM4
|
5.6%
|
5.9%
|
6.5%
|
-0.9 pp
|
-0.3 pp
|
5.7%
|
6.3%
|
-0.6 pp
|
Loan yields5
|
11.1%
|
11.4%
|
12.0%
|
-0.9 pp
|
-0.3 pp
|
11.3%
|
11.9%
|
-0.6 pp
|
Deposit rates6
|
4.6%
|
4.8%
|
4.5%
|
0.1 pp
|
-0.2 pp
|
4.7%
|
4.5%
|
0.2 pp
|
Cost of
funding7
|
5.4%
|
5.4%
|
5.2%
|
0.2 pp
|
0.0 pp
|
5.4%
|
5.2%
|
0.2 pp
|
Asset quality & portfolio
concentration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of risk8
|
0.3%
|
0.7%
|
0.5%
|
-0.2 pp
|
-0.4 pp
|
0.5%
|
0.8%
|
-0.3 pp
|
PAR 90 to gross
loans9
|
1.3%
|
1.2%
|
1.1%
|
0.2 pp
|
0.1 pp
|
1.3%
|
1.1%
|
0.2 pp
|
NPLs to gross
loans10
|
2.0%
|
2.2%
|
2.1%
|
-0.1 pp
|
-0.2 pp
|
2.0%
|
2.1%
|
-0.1 pp
|
NPL provision
coverage11
|
68.2%
|
68.1%
|
85.3%
|
-17.1 pp
|
0.1 pp
|
68.2%
|
85.3%
|
-17.1 pp
|
Total NPL
coverage12
|
138.4%
|
136.6%
|
150.9%
|
-12.5 pp
|
1.8 pp
|
138.4%
|
150.9%
|
-12.5 pp
|
For the ratio definitions and exchange rates, please refer to
appendix 3.
Uzbekistan
business
Profit and loss statement
In
thousands of GEL
|
2Q'24
|
1Q'24
|
2Q'23
|
Change YoY
|
Change QoQ
|
1H'24
|
1H'23
|
Change YoY
|
Interest income
|
123,740
|
101,324
|
56,989
|
NMF
|
22.1%
|
225,064
|
103,255
|
NMF
|
Interest expense
|
(56,729)
|
(47,028)
|
(27,228)
|
NMF
|
20.6%
|
(103,757)
|
(50,366)
|
NMF
|
Net
interest income
|
67,011
|
54,296
|
29,761
|
NMF
|
23.4%
|
121,307
|
52,889
|
NMF
|
Fee and commission income
|
34,861
|
28,073
|
24,978
|
39.6%
|
24.2%
|
62,934
|
45,841
|
37.3%
|
Fee and commission
expense
|
(10,771)
|
(7,899)
|
(6,467)
|
66.6%
|
36.4%
|
(18,670)
|
(10,472)
|
78.3%
|
Net
fee and commission income
|
24,090
|
20,174
|
18,511
|
30.1%
|
19.4%
|
44,264
|
35,369
|
25.1%
|
Net gains from currency derivatives,
foreign currency operations and translation
|
(30)
|
(426)
|
15
|
NMF
|
-93.0%
|
(456)
|
83
|
NMF
|
Other operating income
|
10
|
1
|
4
|
NMF
|
NMF
|
11
|
32
|
-65.6%
|
Other operating non-interest (expense)/income
|
(20)
|
(425)
|
19
|
NMF
|
-95.3%
|
(445)
|
115
|
NMF
|
Credit loss allowance for loans to
customers
|
(14,050)
|
(11,753)
|
(7,641)
|
83.9%
|
19.5%
|
(25,803)
|
(12,882)
|
NMF
|
Credit loss allowance for other
financial items and net impairment for non-financial
assets
|
(1,029)
|
(523)
|
(692)
|
48.7%
|
96.7%
|
(1,552)
|
(1,301)
|
19.3%
|
Operating income after expected credit and non-financial
asset impairment losses
|
76,002
|
61,769
|
39,958
|
90.2%
|
23.0%
|
137,771
|
74,190
|
86%
|
Staff costs
|
(15,028)
|
(12,974)
|
(9,310)
|
61.4%
|
15.8%
|
(28,002)
|
(18,300)
|
53.0%
|
Depreciation and
amortisation
|
(3,153)
|
(2,759)
|
(2,120)
|
48.7%
|
14.3%
|
(5,912)
|
(4,230)
|
39.8%
|
Administrative and other operating
expenses
|
(30,181)
|
(24,635)
|
(14,711)
|
NMF
|
22.5%
|
(54,816)
|
(24,825)
|
NMF
|
Operating expenses
|
(48,362)
|
(40,368)
|
(26,141)
|
85.0%
|
19.8%
|
(88,730)
|
(47,355)
|
87.4%
|
Profit before tax
|
27,640
|
21,401
|
13,817
|
100.0%
|
29.2%
|
49,041
|
26,835
|
82.8%
|
Income tax expense
|
(3,861)
|
(2,964)
|
(1,312)
|
NMF
|
30.3%
|
(6,825)
|
(1,623)
|
NMF
|
Profit for the period
|
23,779
|
18,437
|
12,505
|
90.2%
|
29.0%
|
42,216
|
25,212
|
67.4%
|
Balance sheet highlights
In
thousands of GEL
|
Jun'24
|
Mar'24
|
Jun'23
|
Change YoY
|
Change QoQ
|
Cash & CBU mandatory
reserves
|
207,848
|
190,926
|
72,114
|
NMF
|
8.9%
|
Loans and advances to
customers
|
1,068,992
|
886,119
|
505,878
|
NMF
|
20.6%
|
Intangible assets and
Goodwill
|
60,633
|
33,990
|
24,828
|
NMF
|
78.4%
|
Other assets
|
228,993
|
185,619
|
153,768
|
48.9%
|
23.4%
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
1,566,466
|
1,296,654
|
756,588
|
NMF
|
20.8%
|
Due to credit
institutions
|
331,137
|
183,940
|
29,083
|
NMF
|
80.0%
|
Customer accounts
|
721,632
|
657,190
|
457,340
|
57.8%
|
9.8%
|
Subordinated debt and debt
securities in issue
|
46,869
|
43,151
|
-
|
NMF
|
8.6%
|
Other liabilities
|
78,852
|
91,471
|
39,059
|
NMF
|
-13.8%
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
1,178,490
|
975,752
|
525,482
|
NMF
|
20.8%
|
Equity attributable to
shareholders
|
387,976
|
320,902
|
231,106
|
67.9%
|
20.9%
|
TOTQL EQUITY
|
387,976
|
320,902
|
231,106
|
67.9%
|
20.9%
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
1,566,466
|
1,296,654
|
756,588
|
NMF
|
20.8%
|
Key ratios
Uzbekistan business
|
2Q'24
|
1Q'24
|
2Q'23
|
Change YoY
|
Change QoQ
|
1H'24
|
1H'23
|
Change YoY
|
Profitability ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE1
|
27.8%
|
23.7%
|
22.1%
|
5.7 pp
|
4.1 pp
|
25.7%
|
25.1%
|
0.6 pp
|
ROA2
|
6.9%
|
6.5%
|
7.1%
|
-0.2 pp
|
0.4 pp
|
6.7%
|
8.0%
|
-1.3 pp
|
Cost to
income3
|
53.1%
|
54.5%
|
54.1%
|
-1.0 pp
|
-1.4 pp
|
53.7%
|
53.6%
|
0.1 pp
|
NIM4
|
24.4%
|
23.6%
|
20.1%
|
4.2 pp
|
0.7 pp
|
24.0%
|
20.1%
|
3.7 pp
|
Loan yields5
|
44.2%
|
43.2%
|
43.0%
|
1.2 pp
|
1.0 pp
|
43.7%
|
43.1%
|
0.6 pp
|
Deposit rates6
|
24.8%
|
25.4%
|
24.9%
|
-0.1 pp
|
-0.6 pp
|
25.1%
|
25.0%
|
0.1 pp
|
Cost of
funding7
|
23.1%
|
24.1%
|
24.5%
|
-1.4 pp
|
-1.0 pp
|
23.6%
|
24.6%
|
-1.0 pp
|
Asset quality & portfolio
concentration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of risk8
|
5.5%
|
5.5%
|
6.6%
|
-1.1 pp
|
0.0 pp
|
5.5%
|
6.1%
|
-0.6 pp
|
PAR 90 to gross
loans9
|
2.5%
|
2.1%
|
2.2%
|
0.3 pp
|
0.4 pp
|
2.5%
|
2.2%
|
0.3 pp
|
NPLs to gross
loans10
|
2.5%
|
2.1%
|
2.2%
|
0.3 pp
|
0.4 pp
|
2.5%
|
2.2%
|
0.3 pp
|
NPL provision
coverage11
|
192.8%
|
220.8%
|
180.0%
|
12.8 pp
|
-28.0 pp
|
192.8%
|
180.0%
|
12.8 pp
|
Total NPL
coverage12
|
192.8%
|
220.8%
|
180.0%
|
12.8 pp
|
-28.0 pp
|
192.8%
|
180.0%
|
12.8 pp
|
For the ratio definitions and exchange rates, please refer to
appendix 3.
2) Glossary
Terminology
|
Definition
|
BVPS
|
Book value per share
|
CBU
|
Central Bank of
Uzbekistan
|
Consumer loans
|
Unsecured loans to
individuals
|
Digital daily active users (Digital
DAU)
|
The number of retail digital users,
who logged into our digital channels at least once per
day
|
Digital monthly active users
(Digital MAU)
|
The number of retail digital users,
who logged into our digital channels at least once a
month
|
EPS
|
Earnings per share
|
Gross merchandise value
(GMV)
|
GMV equals the total value of sales
over the given period, including auctions through housing
and auto platforms, as
well as listing fees
|
Monthly active customers
(MAC)
|
For Georgian business, an individual
user who has at least one active product as of the reporting date
or performed at least one transaction during the past month. For
Uzbek business, an individual user who logged into the digital
application at least once during the month
|
NBG
|
National Bank of Georgia
|
3) Ratio
definitions and exchange rates
Ratio definitions
1. Return on average total equity
(ROE) equals profit attributable to owners divided by the monthly
average of total shareholders' equity attributable to the PLC's
equity holders for the same period; annualised where
applicable.
2. Return on average total assets
(ROA) equals profit of the period divided by monthly average total
assets for the same period; annualised where applicable.
3. Cost to income ratio equals
total operating expenses for the period divided by the total
revenue for the same period. (Revenue represents the sum of net
interest income, net fee and commission income and other
non-interest income).
4. Net interest margin (NIM) is
net interest income divided by monthly average interest-earning
assets; annualised where applicable. Interest-earning assets
include investment securities (excluding CIB shares), net
investment in finance lease, net loans, and amounts due from credit
institutions.
5. Loan yields equal interest
income on loans and advances to customers divided by monthly
average gross loans and advances to customers; annualised where
applicable.
6. Deposit rates equal interest
expense on customer accounts divided by monthly average total
customer deposits; annualised where applicable.
7. Cost of funding equals sum of
the total interest expense and net interest gains on currency swaps
(entered for funding management purposes), divided by monthly
average interest-bearing liabilities; annualised where
applicable.
8. Cost of risk equals credit loss
allowance for loans to customers divided by monthly average gross
loans and advances to customers; annualised where
applicable.
9. PAR 90 to gross loans ratio
equals loans for which principal or interest repayment is overdue
for more than 90 days divided by the gross loan portfolio for the
same period.
10. NPLs to gross loans equals
loans with 90 days past due on principal or interest payments, and
loans with a well-defined weakness, regardless of the existence of
any past-due amount or of the number of days past due divided by
the gross loan portfolio for the same period.
11. NPL provision coverage equals
total credit loss allowance for loans to customers divided by the
NPL loans.
12. Total NPL coverage equals
total credit loss allowance plus the minimum of collateral amount
of the respective NPL loan (after applying haircuts in the range of
0%-50% for cash, gold, real estate and PPE) and its gross loan
exposure divided by the gross exposure of total NPL
loans.
13. Credit loss level to gross
loans equals credit loss allowance for loans to customers divided
by the gross loan portfolio for the same period.
14. Related party loans to total
loans equals related party loans divided by the gross loan
portfolio.
15. Top 10 borrowers to total
portfolio equals the total loan amount of the top 10 borrowers
divided by the gross loan portfolio.
16. Top 20 borrowers to total
portfolio equals the total loan amount of the top 20 borrowers
divided by the gross loan portfolio.
17. Net loans to deposits plus IFI
funding ratio equals net loans divided by total deposits plus
borrowings received from international financial
institutions.
18. Leverage equals total assets
to total equity.
19. Net stable funding ratio
equals the available amount of stable funding divided by the
required amount of stable funding as defined by NBG in line with
Basel III guidelines. Calculations are made for TBC Bank
standalone.
20. Liquidity coverage ratio
equals high-quality liquid assets divided by the total net cash
outflow amount as defined by the NBG. Calculations are made for TBC
Bank standalone.
21. CET 1 CAR equals CET 1 capital
divided by total risk weighted assets, both calculated in
accordance with requirements of the NBG Basel III standards.
Calculations are made for TBC Bank standalone.
22. Tier 1 CAR equals tier I
capital divided by total risk weighted assets, both calculated in
accordance with the requirements of the NBG Basel III standards.
Calculations are made for TBC Bank standalone.
23. Total CAR equals total capital
divided by total risk weighted assets, both calculated in
accordance with the requirements of the NBG Basel III standards.
Calculations are made for TBC Bank standalone.
24. CET 1 CAR equals CET 1 capital
divided by total risk weighted assets, both calculated in
accordance with requirements of the CBU in national accounting
standards. Calculations are made for TBC UZ Bank
standalone.
25. Tier 1 CAR equals tier I
capital divided by total risk weighted assets, both calculated in
accordance with the requirements of the CBU in national accounting
standards. Calculations are made for TBC UZ Bank
standalone.
26. Total CAR equals total capital
divided by total risk weighted assets, both calculated in
accordance with the requirements of the CBU in national accounting
standards. Calculations are made for TBC UZ Bank
standalone.
Exchange rates
To calculate the QoQ growth of the
balance sheet items without the currency exchange rate effect, we
used the USD/GEL exchange rate of 2.6953 as of 31 March 2024. To
calculate the YoY growth without the currency exchange rate effect,
we used the USD/GEL exchange rate of 2.6177 as of 30 June 2023. As
of 30 June 2024, the USD/GEL exchange rate equalled 2.8101. For
P&L items growth calculations without the currency effect, we
used the average USD/GEL exchange rate for the following periods:
1Q 2024 of 2.6713 and 2Q 2023 of 2.5586. As of 2Q 2024, the USD/GEL
exchange rate equalled 2.7396, 1H 2024 of 2.7054, 1H 2023 of
2.5975.
Risk management
Overview
The Group operates a strong,
independent, business-minded risk management system. Its main
objective is to safeguard the sustainable earnings capacity of the
balance sheet on the basis of risk-adjusted returns through the
implementation of an efficient risk management system. The Group
has adopted four primary risk management principles to better
accomplish its major objectives:
· Govern risks transparently to ensure cross-functional,
harmonised understanding and trust. Consistency and transparency in
risk-related processes and policies are preconditions for gaining
the trust of multiple stakeholders. Communicating risk goals and
strategic priorities to governing bodies and providing a
comprehensive follow-up in an accountable manner are key priorities
for the staff responsible for risk management;
· Manage risks prudently to promote sustainable earnings growth
and resilience. Risk management acts as a backstop against
unrewarded or even excessive risk-taking. Strong risk management
with a well established, forward-looking stress testing framework
ensures the Group's sustainability and resilience;
· Ensure that risk management underpins the implementation of
strategy. Staff responsible for risk management provide assurance
on the feasibility of achieving objectives through risk
identification and management. The risk management function
provides a framework under which stakeholders are empowered to make
risk-based decisions by identifying, quantifying, and adequately
pricing risks. It also creates the conditions for formulating
risk mitigation actions, thus supporting the long term generation
of desired returns and the achievement of planned
targets;
· Use
risk management to gain a competitive advantage. Providing tools
for faster decision-making and supporting business operations,
ensuring the sustainability and resilience of the business model,
establishes risk management as a core component of the Group's
competitive strategy.
Risk management framework
The Group employs a comprehensive
enterprise-wide Risk Management Framework, placing a strong
emphasis on cultivating a robust risk culture throughout the
organisation. This framework is strategically designed to ensure
that effective governance capabilities and methodologies are in
place, facilitating sound risk management and informed
decision-making.
Aligned with the Group's
overarching strategic objectives, the risk management framework
establishes standards and objectives while delineating roles and
responsibilities. The Group's principal risks, as detailed in this
section, are systematically controlled and managed within the
framework, promoting consistency across the organisation and its
subsidiaries.
Led by the Chief Risk Officer and
developed by the Group's independent Risk function, the framework
undergoes an annual review and approval process by the Board. It
encompasses risk governance through the Group's three lines of
defence operating model.
The Group's risk appetite,
supported by a robust set of principles, policies, and practices,
defines acceptable levels of tolerance for various risks. This
structured approach guides risk-taking within established
boundaries, ensuring a proactive and disciplined risk management
stance.
The Group operates under the
principle that all teams share responsibility for managing risk,
with a particular emphasis on those facing the client. However, the
Risk function assumes a crucial role in overseeing and monitoring
risk management activities. This includes development of the
framework and ensuring adherence to supporting policies, standards,
and operational procedures. The Chief Risk Officer regularly
reports to the Board Risk Committee on the Group's risk profile and
performance as well as on the effectiveness of the Group's system
of internal control.
Moreover, the Group has instituted
a rigorous process to identify and manage material and emerging
threats. These threats, which are deemed to potentially adversely
affect the Group's ability to meet its strategic objectives, are
regularly reported to the Board. The Group's applied, comprehensive
approach considers the interdependence of material and emerging
threats, enhancing the overall risk intelligence provided to
stakeholders.
Governance
The Group's risk governance
structure is crafted to ensure robust oversight and strategic
decision-making within risk management. At its core, risk-focused
committees and risk functions assume pivotal roles in orchestrating
effective risk management practices within the Group as a whole and
its individual subsidiaries.
At the Supervisory Board level,
while the boards are responsible for overseeing risk management, in
some instances, activities within risk management and control are
delegated to risk committees for effective handling.
Responsibilities encompass aligning risk practices with strategic
goals, setting risk appetite, discussing and approving risk
policies, fostering a culture of responsible risk-taking, and
monitoring risk identification and assessment processes. The
committees are tasked with overseeing regular assessments of
emerging and principal risks that could impact the business model,
performance, solvency, and liquidity. Their leadership is critical
for effective risk management and the long-term viability of the
Group.
At the management board level,
committees assume a crucial role in steering effective risk
management within subsidiaries. Whether through a single risk
committee or multiple committees with more granular scopes (e.g.
financial risks, reputational risk, or information security), their
responsibilities include closely overseeing risk exposures and
making key decisions on risk mitigation and control. While specific
duties may differ, the overall mission remains consistent: aligning
risk management practices with regulatory requirements and risk
tolerance. In cases where Group companies are of a smaller scale,
risk committees may not be present, and the management board itself
assumes these responsibilities.
Risk culture and three lines of defence
At the core of the Group's Risk
Management Framework and practices is a robust risk culture that
underscores the institution's commitment to prudent and strategic
risk-taking. The Group expects its leaders to demonstrate strong
risk management behaviour, providing clarity on the desired level
of risk taking, developing their respective capabilities and
frameworks , and motivating employees to ensure risk-minded
decision making.
The key principles governing risk
culture across all the Group's subsidiaries include: Board
leadership (the Board sets the tone and establishes a foundation
for a risk-aware culture throughout the organization); employee
understanding and accountability (the Group ensures that employees
at every level understand the institution's approach to risk and
there is a clear understanding that individuals are accountable for
their actions concerning risk-taking behaviors aligned with the
Group's standards); communication (open, transparent, and effective
communication is fundamental to the Group's risk culture); and
remuneration incentives (the Group reinforces its risk culture by
aligning remuneration incentives with sound risk management
practices).
This holistic approach to risk
culture ensures that the Group and its subsidiaries are equipped
with a resilient and proactive mindset, where risk management is
ingrained in the organisational DNA.
To comprehensively manage risks,
the Group ensures adherence to the three lines of defence
model:
· First Line of Defence: Business lines, as frontline
defenders, engage in risk-taking activities with awareness of their
impact on risks that may contribute to or hinder the achievement of
the Group's objectives. A well established risk culture is a
foundation for risk-taking decisions.
· Second Line of Defence: Risk management functions ensure
effective risk management and controls by consolidating expertise,
identifying, measuring, and monitoring risks, and assisting the
first line. They act independently from the business lines and
provide frameworks and tools for effective risk
management.
· Third Line of Defence: The internal audit function provides
assurance to the Board of Directors that the risk management and
control efforts of both the first and second lines of defence meet
the expectations set by the Board of Directors.
Risk appetite
Risk appetite is defined as the set
of acceptable limits that shape the combinatory level of risk that
the Group or its key subsidiaries are prepared to accept in pursuit
of return and value creation consistent with the approved strategy.
The Group's Risk Appetite Framework, which governs enterprise risk
management, establishes the extent and process of permissible
risk-taking to guide the Group's business outcomes.
Considering the ever-changing risk
profile of the Group, the risk appetite frameworks of the Group and
its key subsidiaries are regularly reviewed, updated, and approved
by the Board to make sure they remain aligned with the Group's
desired level of risk-taking.
Risk identification
The identification of risks serves
as the foundational step in the Group's risk management process.
This process systematically recognises and documents any potential
direct or indirect risks that could impact the achievement of
organizational objectives. It is imperative that this
identification leverages input from the Group's lines of defence
within the organisation as well as external stakeholders to ensure
a comprehensive and anticipatory definition.
The risk identification process
within the Group is governed by the Risk Registry Framework.
Regular reviews and adjustments of the Risk Registry are undertaken
to ensure its consistent relevance and effectiveness.
Risk measurement
The Group places significant
emphasis on a comprehensive approach to risk measurement, aligning
with its commitment towards proactive risk management practices.
Each identified risk direction is accompanied by tools for
quantitative and qualitative measurement. The process is dynamic,
continuously adapting to changes in the financial landscape and
regulatory environment. Regular reviews and assessments ensure the
effectiveness of the risk measurement tools and
methodologies.
Risk mitigation
Risk mitigation is a proactive
approach aimed at minimizing the potential negative consequences of
risks. To proactively approach every material risk, the Group
develops and implements harmonised risk policies and frameworks,
which play a key role by:
· Setting standards and guidelines - risk policies outline the
standards and guidelines for how risks should be managed within the
organisation and provide a structured approach to addressing risks,
ensuring consistency and compliance with regulatory and internal
requirements.
· Defining roles and responsibilities - risk policies clarify
the roles and responsibilities of different individuals and
departments in the risk mitigation process.
· Establishing procedures - risk policies provide a guiding
framework for developing procedures for risk mitigation
activities.
All policies are subject to
regular reviews and updates to adapt to new challenges and refine
its risk management strategies over time.
Risk monitoring and reporting
Risk reporting stands as a
cornerstone within the Group's robust risk management framework.
The Group and its subsidiaries are mandated to establish robust
risk reporting processes. These processes are designed to regularly
communicate material risk exposures and the overall risk profile to
the Supervisory and Management Boards as well as senior
management.
Regular monitoring is essential to
ensure compliance with established risk appetite and regulatory
limits. It serves as a proactive measure to observe the evolution
of the prevailing risk environment. The Group emphasises a
structured approach to risk reporting, encompassing monitoring, to
effectively capture, assess, and communicate risks. This ensures
the provision of clear and timely information, fostering
accountability among stakeholders in managing and addressing
risks.
In addition to routine reporting,
ad-hoc reporting can be triggered by key vulnerabilities,
significant risk identification, or deviations from the targeted
risk profile. This agile approach ensures that the risk reporting
mechanism remains responsive to emerging risks and evolving
circumstances.
Internal control
TBC Group is introducing its
streamlined Integrated Control Assurance Framework, seamlessly
aligning risk, control, compliance, and internal audit functions
for integrity, efficiency, and regulatory compliance. This
comprehensive framework ensures meticulous adherence to policies
and procedures, catering to the diverse needs of our products and
services. The integrated view enables a collective audit asset
database that is generated across first, second, and third lines of
defence as well as regulatory and legal, reflecting our commitment
to transparency and accountability.
The Internal Control Framework
extends to the evaluation, testing, and follow-up of high and
critical-risk processes, while simultaneously focusing on enhancing
risk awareness and refining internal controls. Continuous
monitoring and improvement initiatives are integral components,
enhancing operational effectiveness within the framework. This
approach fosters a culture of internal control, showcasing our
dedication to excellence in managing internal controls and
risks.
Stress testing and contingency planning
It is essential for the Group to
examine its financial performance under conditions that diverge
from baseline expectations. For that reason, the Group subjects
itself to various stress scenarios with the intent to identify
vulnerabilities, quantify potential losses, and assess the
sufficiency of risk mitigation measures. Currently, JSC TBC Bank
has established its own comprehensive stress testing framework,
which encompasses a range of scenarios to assess its resilience.
This includes scenarios related to capital, liquidity, credit,
cyber and other risk factors relevant to the prevailing risk
environment. Stress testing is crucial to evaluate the ability to
withstand adverse conditions, such as economic downturns, market
volatility, and unforeseen events. Regular reviews and adjustments
are essential to ensure the consistent relevance and effectiveness
of the stress testing frameworks.
The Bank regularly performs stress
test exercises. Stress tests are conducted either within predefined
frameworks such as ICAAP, ILAAP and Recovery Planning,
or/and on an ad-hoc basis to assess the impact of certain
system-wide or idiosyncatic events on the Bank's capital,
liquidity, and financial positions. Although the overall stress
testing approach is consistent, the severity of the stress
scenarios differ according to the relevant framework.
In addition to stress testing
analysis, the Recovery Plan serves as a strategic blueprint for
both the Supervisory Board and the management to ensure readiness
for specific stress conditions. The Recovery Plan provides clear
recovery options with specific steps to be undertaken including
transparent and timely communication to internal and external
stakeholders. The framework is subject to regular reviews and
adjustments to ensure its consistent relevance and
effectiveness.
The Bank also has a Business
Continuity Plan in place. This plan ensures that the organisation
is prepared to respond effectively to disruptions. By outlining
strategies to maintain revenue streams and minimize financial
losses during disruptions, these practices help to safeguard the
organisation's financial stability and long-term viability.
Material Existing and Emerging
Risks
Risk Management is a critical
pillar of the Group's strategy. It is essential to identify
emerging risks and uncertainties that could adversely impact the
Group's performance, financial condition, and prospects. This
section analyses the material principal and emerging risks and
uncertainties that the Group faces. However, we cannot exclude the
possibility of the Group's performance being affected by risks and
uncertainties other than those listed below.
The Board has undertaken a robust
assessment of both the principal and emerging risks facing the
Group and the long-term viability of the Group's operations, in
order to determine whether to adopt the going concern basis of
accounting.
PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
Specific focus in 1H 2024
1.
The Group's performance may be compromised by internal political
instability or adverse developments in the region, in particular
the war in Ukraine, the possible spread of the geopolitical crisis
and/or the potential outflow of migrants from Georgia as well as
further military escalation in the middle east, which could have a
material impact on the operating environment in Georgia and
Uzbekistan.
Risk description
The Group's performance is highly
vulnerable to geopolitical developments in its two major operation
markets - Georgia and Uzbekistan.
Although inflows to the Georgian
economy are quite diversified, the country is still vulnerable to
geopolitical and economic developments in the region. In
particular, the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the consequent
sanctions imposed on Russia and the resulting elevated
uncertainties may have an adverse impact on the Georgian economy.
The country is also exposed to the risks of renewed military
conflicts in its breakaway regions occupied by Russia and potential
political instability related to the 2024 parliamentary elections,
while some relatively distant conflicts, such as the escalation in
the Middle East, might affect the Georgian economy through a
stronger USD, higher oil prices, migration flows, etc.
While the migration effect
continues to make an important contribution to economic activity,
any sizeable outflow could lead to a deterioration in the business
environment. The reverse would probably be the case in any rapid
conflict resolution scenario, which would create positive economic
spillovers as well, such as the likely stronger rebound of growth
in Russia and Ukraine.
Moreover, the Russian invasion of
Ukraine and related economic policy and geopolitical uncertainties
pose a risk to the business environment in Uzbekistan, including
but not limited to the geopolitical tensions in Central
Asia.
Materialisation of these risks
could severely hamper economic activity in Georgia and Uzbekistan,
and negatively impact the business environment and client and
customer base of the Group.
Risk mitigation
The Group actively employs stress
testing and other risk measurement and monitoring tools to ensure
that early triggers are identified and translated into specific
action plans to minimise any negative impact on the Bank's capital
adequacy, liquidity, and portfolio quality. In extreme stress
cases, where regulatory requirements may be breached, the Bank has
a Recovery Plan in place, which helps to guide the Board and
the management through the process of recovery of the capital
and/or liquidity positions within a prescribed
timeframe.
2.
The Group's operating region introduces financial crime
risk.
Risk description
Financial crime risk covers money
laundering, terrorist financing, bribery and corruption, and
sanctions risks. The risks associated with sanctions have
increased, particularly in recent years. Therefore the Group's
specific focus in 2024 remained on managing sanctions
risk.
Historically, Georgia has enjoyed
close business relations with Russia and Ukraine. The aggression
launched by the Russian Federation against Ukraine on the 24th of
February 2022 resulted in a vigorous international response, which
included the imposition of tough economic sanctions by the US, the
EU, the UK and other countries. As a consequence, Russian and
Belarusian members of legislative and government agencies,
oligarchs, businessmen, state-owned companies, financial
institutions and other legal entities have been directly
sanctioned, while numerous economic restrictions and trade
prohibitions have been enforced on specific sectors of activity and
categories of goods and services in Russia, Belarus, Crimea, and
other occupied territories. Leading countries are tightening and
expanding the sanctions programme by extending some restrictions
and adding new entities and individuals to their list. Moreover, as
a consequence of the conflict, many Russian citizens have relocated
to Georgia. Considering the level of interaction between the Group,
Russia and Russian citizens, and the breadth of the sanctions'
prohibitions and restrictions, the risk of being involved in
attempts to circumvent sanctions has substantially
increased.
The executive order of December
2023 by US's sanctioning authority OFAC has caused Georgian
financial institutions to conduct their operations responding to
the requirements of the decree. Namely, in accordance with this
restriction, the transactions involving Russian entities operating
in main fields of Russian economy or somehow connected to Russian
Military-Industrial bases are now falling under the increased
scrutiny from the Bank.
In addition to the sanctions risk
related to Russia, a significant increase in international shipping
costs and the crisis in the Red Sea have led to a surge in freight
shipping from China instead of sea routes. This situation has
exposed Georgia to the risk of financing transshipments via Iran
for its import and export activities with Asian countries, a
practice prohibited by the US government. Breaches of the US, EU
and UK sanctions regime would expose the Group to fines and
regulatory actions by the local regulator, the National Bank of
Georgia, and by US, EU and UK authorities and enforcement agencies.
In addition to the regulatory risk, the Group also faces a
reputational risk, mainly with its correspondent banks and other
financial third party relationships.
Risk mitigation
The Group has a zero tolerance
stance towards any prospect of breaching or facilitating the breach
or avoidance of UN, UK, US and EU sanctions. The Group is committed
to avoiding any deals or transactions with direct or indirect
sanctioned parties or goods or services.
The Group has adopted a Group-wide
Financial Crime Policy that sets requirements in the following key
risk areas: money laundering, terrorist fianancing, bribery,
corruption, and sanctions. The policy applies to all Group member
companies, business activities and employees. Employees receive
trainings on financial crime risk management. The employees are
made aware of the Group's appetite for and approach to financial
crime management as well as the potential consequences
following the failure to comply with the financial crime
policy.
The Group aims to protect its
customers, shareholders, and society from financial crime and any
resulting threat. The Group is fully committed to complying with
applicable international and domestic laws and regulations related
to financial crime as well as relevant legislation in other
countries where Group member financial institutions operate. It has
a long-standing ambition to meet the respective industry best
practice standards.
The Group has implemented internal
policies, procedures and detailed instructions designed to prevent
any association with money laundering, financing of terrorism, or
any other unlawful activities such as bribery, corruption,
sanctions or tax evasion. The Group's AML/CTF compliance programme,
as implemented, comprises written policies, procedures, internal
controls and systems including, but not limited to: policies and
procedures to ensure compliance with AML laws and regulations; KYC
and customer due diligence procedures; a customer acceptance
policy; screening against a global list of terrorists, vessels,
specially designated nationalities, relevant financial and other
sanctions lists; regular staff training and awareness raising; and
procedures for monitoring and reporting suspicious activities by
the Bank's customers.
The Bank has dedicated material
resources to sanctions risk management. It has:
· Purchased software and databases that assist the Bank
on sanctions risk mitigation;
· Engaged external advisers in to produce recommendations on
improvements in sanctions risk management;
· Engaged external audits to assess internal policies and
procedures;
· Empowered dedicated staff with the relevant, specific
knowledge;
· Made
new arrangements within Compliance Departmanet, as part of which
new human resources were added to the divisions.
As part of the second line of
defence, the Bank's Compliance Department seeks to manage risk in
accordance with the risk appetite defined by the Group and promotes
a strong risk culture throughout the organisation.The Group has a
sophisticated, artificial intelligence-based AML solution in place
to enable AML Officers to monitor clients' transactions and
identify suspicious behaviour. Using data analytics and machine
learning, the Group developed an anomaly detection tool to bring
very complex cases to the surface, using client network analysis to
identify organized money laundering cases and enriched pre-defined
patterns to create an automated system. This approach has an
immense business value as it uncovers cases in ways that would
otherwise be prohibitively expensive, since manual analysis of
these transactions is an extremely time-consuming process for AML
officers. The tool compiles all these incidents into dashboards and
presents them to AML officers for further action.
The Bank's Compliance Department
works on constantly improving the software to increase operational
efficiency and decrease false-positive alerts, in light of which
the new external consultant company was hired. The Bank performs an
enterprise-wide AML/CTF/Sanctions Risk Assessment annually, in line
with the approved methodology. Overall Group-wide residual risks
for the year 2023 were assessed as medium. The Bank's Compliance
Department addresses areas of attention in a timely and proper
manner. In response to the ever emerging challenges in sanctions
compliance, the new divison of Sanctions Control has been
established within the Compliance Department, which is hiring new
staff in order to better address threats of sanctions
circumvention.
FINANCIAL RISKS
1.
The majority of the Group's earnings capacity is generated via
credit risk bearing asset side elements.
Risk description
Credit risk is the greatest
material risk faced by the Group, given that the Group is
principally engaged in traditional lending activities. It is the
risk of losses due to the failure of a customer or counterparty to
meet their obligations to settle outstanding amounts in accordance
with agreed terms. The Group's customers include legal entities as
well as individual borrowers. Due to the high level of
dollarisation in Georgia's financial sector, currency-induced
credit risk is a component of credit risk, which relates to risks
arising from foreign currency-denominated loans to unhedged
borrowers in the Group's portfolio. Credit risk also includes
concentration risk, which is the risk related to credit portfolio
quality deterioration as a result of large exposures to single
borrowers or groups of connected borrowers, or loan concentration
in certain economic industries. Losses incurred due to credit risk
may be further aggravated by unfavourable macroeconomic
conditions.
Currency-induced credit risk (CICR)
- While the Group's banking business in Uzbekistan is focused on
lending in the local currency, the banking business in Georgia has
a significant credit portfolio in foreign currencies. A potential
material GEL depreciation is one of the most significant risks that
could negatively impact credit portfolio quality. As of 30 June
2024, 51.2% of the Group's total gross loans and advances to
customers (before provision for loan impairment) was denominated in
foreign currencies. The income of many customers is directly linked
to foreign currencies via remittances, tourism or exports.
Nevertheless, customers may not be protected against significant
fluctuations in the GEL exchange rate against the currency of the
loan. The GEL remains in free float and is exposed to a range of
internal and external factors that, in some circumstances, could
lead to its depreciation. In the first half of 2024, the average
US$/GEL currency exchange rate depreciated by 4.2%
year-on-year.
Concentration risk - Although the
Group is exposed to single-name and sectoral concentration
risks, the Group's portfolio is well diversified both across
sectors and single-name borrowers, resulting in only a moderate
vulnerability to concentration risks. However, should exposure to
common risk drivers increase, the risks are expected to amplify
accordingly. At a consolidated level, the Group's maximum exposure
to the single largest industry (real estate) stood at 11% of the
loan portfolio as of 30 June 2024. At the same time, exposure to
the 20 largest borrowers stood at 8.7% of the loan
portfolio.
In addition, credit risk also
includes counterparty credit risk, as the Group engages in various
financial transactions with both banking and non-banking financial
institutions. Through performing banking services such as lending
in the interbank money market, settling a transaction in the
interbank foreign exchange market, entering into interbank
transactions related to trade finance or investing in securities,
the Group is exposed to the risk of losses due to the failure of a
counterparty bank to meet its obligations.
Risk mitigation
A comprehensive Credit Risk
Assessment Framework is in place with a clear division of duties
among the parties involved in the credit analysis and approval
process. The credit assessment and monitoring processes differ by
segment and product type to reflect the diverse nature of these
asset classes. The Group's credit portfolio is highly diversified
across customer types, product types and industry segments, which
minimises credit risk at the Group level. As of 30 June 2024, the
retail segment represented 38.4% of the total portfolio, which was
comprised of 53.7% mortgage and 46.3% non-mortgage exposures. No
single business sector represented more than 11% of the total
portfolio as of 30 June 2024.
Credit approval
The Group focuses on robust
credit-granting by establishing clear lending criteria and
efficient credit risk assessment processes, including CICR and
concentration risk.
Credit assessments vary by segment
and product, reflecting the characteristics of the different asset
classes. Decisions are either automated or manually assessed,
following segment-specific guidelines. Automated decisions use
internal credit risk scorecards, aiming for increased automation to
enhance decision speed and competitive advantage. For loans needing
manual review or unsuited to automation, credit committees decide,
based on the client's indebtedness and risk profile, in legal
compliance. These committees, structured in multiple tiers, review
and approve loans, differing by size and risk of the credit
product.
To address the CICR, the client's
ability to withstand a certain amount of exchange rate depreciation
is incorporated into the credit underwriting standards, which also
include significant currency depreciation buffers for unhedged
borrowers.
Credit monitoring
The Group emphasizes proactive risk
management, with credit risk monitoring as a core element. We use a
robust system to quickly respond to macro and micro changes,
identifying vulnerabilities in our credit portfolio to make
informed decisions. Our risk resilience involves regular monitoring
of concentration risk, CICR, and other credit risk factors. We
employ a portfolio supervision system to detect weaknesses in
credit exposures, analyse risk trends, and recommend actions
against emerging risks. Particular attention is paid to
currency-induced credit risk, due to the high share of loans
denominated in foreign currencies in the Bank's portfolio. The
vulnerability to exchange rate depreciation is monitored in order
to promptly implement an action plan, as and when needed. Given the
experience and knowledge built through recent currency volatility,
the Bank is in a good position to promptly mitigate exchange rate
depreciation risks.
Tailoring monitoring to segment
specifics, we focus on individual credit exposures, portfolio
performance, and external trends affecting risk profiles. Our
vigilant stance includes early-warning systems to identify
financial deterioration or fraud in clients' positions. These
systems track signs like overdue days, refinancing, LTV changes, or
tax liens. Large overdue exposures receive individual monitoring to
assess clients' loan servicing capabilities.
In fraud prevention, we monitor
first payment defaults across credit experts, bank branches, or
companies employing our clients. Our institutions have credit
monitoring and reporting processes for their Supervisory and
Management Boards or risk committees, ensuring transparency and
informed decision-making.
In addition to our underwriting and
monitoring efforts, relevant buffers are built into our capital
adequacy requirements to ensure that our banks are sufficiently
capitalised to cover CICR, concentration risk, and credit risk in
general. We utilize stress testing and sensitivity analysis to
assess our credit portfolio's resilience, preparing for different
economic conditions and evolving client needs.
Credit risk appetite
The credit risk appetite of the
Group is defined by the Risk Appetite Frameworks of the Group and
its financial institution subsidiaries, guiding credit risk-taking.
These frameworks offer qualitative guidance and quantitative limits
to set acceptable credit risk levels. Key quantitative metrics
include NPL proportion, cost of risk, and NPL coverage. Risk
appetite frameworks also set strict limits and ensure close
monitoring of Currency-Induced Credit Risk and Concentration Risk,
covering sectoral and single-name concentrations.
Credit ratings are essential in
determining credit risk tolerance. They provide a thorough
assessment of a borrower's creditworthiness, which is crucial for
understanding their ability to fulfill their financial commitments.
These ratings are fundamental in establishing guidelines for
acceptable risk levels and are integrated into our risk management
framework. They enhance our ability to define and manage credit
risk, allowing for a detailed understanding of borrower
creditworthiness, leading to informed decision-making and
appropriate risk threshold setting.
We approach credit risk by
combining comprehensive risk appetite frameworks with the strategic
use of credit ratings. This integrated approach enables the Group
to effectively navigate the changing credit risk landscape with
resilience and agility.
Collateral management
In our Georgian bank, collateral is
a key factor in mitigating credit risk, forming a large part of
loan portfolios, while in our Uzbekistan bank, the loan portfolio
is solely unsecured. The Georgian bank accepts diverse collaterals
like real estate, cash deposits, vehicles, equipment, inventory,
precious metals, securities, and third-party guarantees, according
to credit product type and the borrower's credit risk. Real estate
is a major collateral component, while a centralised unit oversees
collateral management, ensuring its adequacy in credit risk
mitigation.
The Collateral Management Framework
includes policy-making, independent valuation, a haircut system
during underwriting, monitoring (revaluations, statistical
analysis), and portfolio analysis. The Bank's Collateral Management
and Appraisal Department defines collateral management policies and
procedures, which are approved by the Board. The department aligns
appraisal services with International Valuation Standards, acting
regulations of the National Bank of Georgia and internal rules,
authorizes appraisal reports, and manages the collateral monitoring
process. High-value assets are revaluated annually, while low-value
collaterals undergo statistical monitoring.
The Collateral Management and
Appraisal Department's quality checks for valuations involves
internal staff reviews and external company assessments. Collateral
management activities are largely automated through a web
application, with support from market research from the Real Estate
Market laboratory project.
Collections and recoveries
In managing credit risk, the Group
activates collection and recovery procedures when clients miss
payments or their financial standing deteriorates, threatening
exposure coverage. This process begins after failed attempts at
restructuring non-performing exposures. Specialised teams in each
segment handle overdue exposures, creating loan recovery plans
tailored to clients' specific situations and adhering to our
ethical code.
Our collections processes involve
supporting clients struggling to meet their obligations. The
strategies depend on exposure size and type, with customised plans
for different customer subgroups based on their risk levels. The
goal is to negotiate with clients to secure cash recoveries through
revised payment schedules as the primary repayment source. If
acceptable terms are not reached, recovery may involve selling
assets or repossessing collateral. Foreclosure may be initiated
through legal processes if negotiation fails. Additional recovery
strategies include sale of the unsecured portfolio to third parties
(debt collection agencies)..
These measures reflect our
commitment to responsible credit risk management, safeguarding
financial stability, and maintaining ethical standards within the
Group.
Counterparty risk
To manage counterparty risk, the
Group defines limits on an individual basis for each counterparty,
while on a portfolio basis it limits the expected loss from both
treasury and trade finance exposures. As of 30 June 2024, the
Bank's interbank exposure was concentrated with banks that external
agencies, such as Fitch, Moody's and Standard and Poor's, have
assigned high A-grade credit ratings.
2.
The Bank underwrites the responsibility to adhere at all times to
minimum regulatory requirements on capital, which may compromise
growth and strategic targets. Additionally, adverse changes in FX
rates may impact capital adequacy ratios.
Risk description
Capital risk is a significant focus
area for the Group. Capital risk is the risk that a bank may not
have a sufficient level of capital to maintain its normal business
activities, and to meet its regulatory capital requirements under
normal or stressed operating conditions. The management's
objectives in terms of capital management are to maintain
appropriate levels of capital to support the business strategy,
meet regulatory and stress testing-related requirements, and
safeguard the Group's ability to continue as a going
concern.
The Group's ability to comply with
regulatory requirements can be affected by both internal and
external factors. Some key concerns include the deterioration of
asset quality leading to losses, reductions in income, rising
expenses, and potential difficulties in raising capital.
Local currency volatility has been
and remains a significant risk for the JSC TBC Bank's capital
adequacy. A 10% GEL depreciation would translate into a 0.8pp,
0.6pp and 0.5pp drop in JSC TBC Bank's excess CET 1, Tier 1 and Total
regulatory capital, respectively.
Risk mitigation
The Group's entities undertake
stress testing and sensitivity analysis to quantify extra capital
consumption under different scenarios. Such analyses indicate that
the Bank holds sufficient capital to meet the current minimum
regulatory requirements. Capital forecasts, as well as the results
of stress testing and what-if scenarios, are actively monitored
with the involvement of the Bank's Executive Management and the
Risk Committee of the Supervisory Board to help ensure prudent
management and timely action, when needed.These analyses are used
to set appropriate risk appetite buffers internally, on top of the
regulatory requirements.
The Bank regularly performs stress
tests serving multiple purposes. They are performed routinely,
either under the frameworks listed or on an ad-hoc basis, to assess
the magnitude of certain stressful environments. Stress tests are
performed for the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process
(ICAAP), regulatory stress tests and the Recovery Plan, among other
purposes.
The key objective of the regulatory
stress test is to define the net stress test buffer under the
capital adequacy minimum requirement framework. Starting from 2018,
regulatory stress tests are performed and submitted to the
regulator upon their request.
The purpose of the ICAAP is to
identify all the material risks faced by the Bank and to have an
internal view of the capital needed to cover those risks. The
objective of the ICAAP is to contribute to the Bank's continuity
from a capital perspective by ensuring that it has sufficient
capital to bear its risks, absorb losses and follow a sustainable
strategy, even during a stress period.
Stress testing under the Recovery
Plan assumes more severe stress scenarios, specifically aimed at
breaching regulatory requirements and assessing the Bank's ability
to recover the capital position with the help of viable recovery
options within a reasonable timeframe.
Under the risk appetite and the
capital planning process, the Bank sets aside capital as a buffer
to withstand certain amount of local currency
fluctuation.
3.
The Group inherently is exposed to funding and market liquidity
risks.
Liquidity risk is the risk
that the Group either may not have sufficient financial resources
available to meet all its obligations and commitments as they fall
due, or may only be able to access those resources at a high
cost.
Liquidity risk is categorised into
two risk types: funding liquidity risk and market liquidity
risk.
a. Funding
liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to
efficiently meet both expected and unexpected current and future
cash flows without affecting either its daily operations or its
financial condition under both normal conditions and during a
crisis.
b. Market
liquidity risk is the risk that the Group cannot easily offset or
eliminate a position at the then-current market price because of
inadequate market depth or market disruption.
While the Group currently has
sufficient financial resources available to meet its obligations as
they fall due, liquidity risk is inherent in banking operations and
can be heightened by numerous factors. These include an
over-reliance on, or an inability to access, a particular source of
funding, as well as changes in credit ratings or market-wide
phenomena. Access to credit for companies in emerging markets is
significantly influenced by the level of investor confidence and,
as such, any factors affecting investor confidence (e.g. a
downgrade in credit ratings, central bank or state interventions,
or debt restructurings in a relevant industry) could influence the
price or the ability to access the funding necessary to make
payments in respect of the Group's future indebtedness.
Both funding and market liquidity
risks can emerge from a number of factors that are beyond the
Group's control. There is adequate liquidity to withstand
significant withdrawals of customer deposits, but the unexpected
and rapid withdrawal of a substantial number of deposits could have
a material adverse impact on the Group's business, financial
condition, and results of operations and/or prospects.
Risk mitigation
The Group's liquidity risk is
managed though the Board's Group Liquidity Risk Management Policy.
The Assets and Liabilities Management Committee (ALCO) is the core
asset-liability management body ensuring that the principal
objectives of the Group's Liquidity Risk Management Policy are met
on a daily basis. The approved Liquidity Risk Management Framework
ensures the Group meets it payment obligations under both normal
and stress situations.
To mitigate the liquidity
risk, the Group holds a solid liquidity position by maintaining
comfortable buffers over the regulatory minimum requirements. All
regulatory ratios are monitored regularly, with an early-warning
system in place to detect potential adverse liquidity events. This
is facilitated by the Risk Appetite Frameworks of the Group's
relevant financial institutions, which set buffers over the
regulatory limits, ensuring early detection of potential liquidity
vulnarabilities. The liquidity risk position and compliance with
internal limits are closely monitored by the ALCOs of JSC TBC Bank
and JSC UZ TBC Bank.
JSC TBC Bank's liquidity risk is
managed by the Balance Sheet Management division and Treasury
department and is monitored by the Management Board and the ALCO,
within their pre-defined functions. The Financial Risk Management
(FRM) division is responsible for developing procedures and policy
documents and setting risk appetites on funding and market
liquidity risk management. In addition, the FRM performs
liquidity risk assessments and communicates the results to the
Management Board and the Risk Committee of the Supervisory Board on
a regular basis.
The Bank maintains a diversified
funding structure to manage the respective liquidity risks. The
Bank's principal sources of liquidity include customer deposits and
accounts, borrowings from local and international banks and
financial institutions, subordinated loans from international
financial institution investors, local interbank short-duration
term deposits and loans, proceeds from the sale of investment
securities, principal repayments on loans, interest income, and fee
and commission income. The Bank relies on relatively stable
deposits from Georgia as its main source of funding. The Bank also
monitors the deposit concentration for large deposits and sets
limits for deposits by non-Georgian residents in its deposit
portfolio.
To maintain and further enhance its
liability structure, the Bank sets targets for deposits and funds
received from international financial institution investors in its
risk appetite via the respective ratios. The loan to deposit and
IFI funding ratio (defined as the total value of gross loans
divided by the sum of the total value of deposits and funds
received from international financial institutions) stood at
100.0%, 90.6% and 97.7%, as at 30 June 2024, 2023 and 2022,
respectively.
The management believes that, in
spite of a substantial portion of customers' accounts being on
demand, the diversification of these deposits by the number and
type of depositors, coupled with the Bank's past experience,
indicates that these customer accounts provide a long-term and
stable source of funding for the Bank. Moreover, the Bank's
liquidity risk management includes the estimation of maturities for
its current deposits. The estimate is based on statistical methods
applied to historic information about the fluctuations of customer
account balances.
Stress testing is a major tool for
managing liquidity risk. Stress testing exercises are performed
within the ILAAP and Recovery Plan Frameworks as well as on an ad
hoc basis, when there is a significant change in the prevailing
risk environment. The former assesses the adequacy of the liquidity
position and relevant buffers and whether they can sustain
plausible severe shocks, while the latter provides a set of
possible actions that could be taken in the unlikely event of
regulatory requirement breaches to support a fast recovery in the
liquidity position. The recovery plan encompasses a Liquidity
Contingency Funding Plan which, along with the risk indicators and
mitigation actions, outlines the roles and responsibilities of
those involved in executing the plan. Both the ILAAP and the
Recovery Plan are performed by the Bank on an annual
basis.
4.
Market risk arises from optimising capital allocation and asset
liability management operations.
Risk description
Market risk is the risk that the
fair value or future cash flows of financial instruments will
fluctuate due to changes in market variables such as interest
rates, foreign exchange rates, and equity prices.
Foreign exchange (FX) risk arises
from the potential change in foreign currency exchange rates, which
can affect the value of a financial instrument. This risk stems
from the open currency positions created due to mismatches in
foreign currency assets and liabilities. The Group identifies,
assesses, monitors, and communicates the risk arising from exchange
rate movements and the factors that influence this risk.
Interest rate risk arises from
potential changes in market interest rates that can adversely
affect the value of the Group's financial assets and liabilities.
This risk can arise from maturity mismatches between assets and
liabilities, as well as from the re-pricing characteristics of such
assets and liabilities.
The biggest share of the Bank's
deposits and part of the loans are at fixed interest rates, while
major part of the Bank's borrowings is at a floating interest rate.
In addition, the Bank actively uses floating and combined
interest rate structures in its loan portfolio. Since the assets
and liabilities have different repricing characteristics, their
corresponding interest margins may increase or decrease as a result
of market interest rate changes potentially entailing negative
effect on net interest income.
Risk Mitigation
The Group's market risk is governed
through the Board's Group FX Risk Management and Group Interest
Rate Risk Management policies.
FX
Risk: To mitigate FX Risk, the
Group sets risk appetite and operational limits on the level of
exposure by currency as well as on aggregate exposure positions
that are more conservative than those set by the regulators.
Compliance with the limits is closely monitored by the respective
ALCOs of JSC TBC Bank and JSC UZ TBC Bank. Compliance with these
limits is also reported periodically to the Management Board and to
the Supervisory Board and its Risk Committee.
In addition, the treasury
department and financial risk management division separately
monitor JSC TBC Bank's compliance with the set limits daily. In
order to safeguard against the inherent volatility in the foreign
exchange market, the Bank employs a risk management process aimed
at mitigating FX risk. This involves the strategic use of spot,
forward, and swap transactions.
To assess currency risk, JSC TBC
Bank performs a VAR sensitivity analysis on a regular basis. This
analysis calculates the effect on the Group's income determined by
the worst possible movements of currency rates against the Georgian
Lari, with all other variables held constant. During the years
ended 30 June 2024 and 2023, this sensitivity analysis did not
reveal any significant potential effect on the Group's equity: as
of 30 June 2024, the maximum loss with a 99% confidence interval
was equal to GEL 11.7 million, compared to a maximum loss of GEL
3.7 million as of 30 June 2023.
Interest Rate Risk: To
mitigate interest rate risk, JSC TBC Bank considers numerous stress
scenarios, including different yield curve shifts and behavioural
adjustments to cash flows (such as deposit withdrawals or loan
prepayments), to calculate the impact on one year profitability and
the enterprise value of equity. In addition, appropriate limits on
both net interest income (NII) and economic value of equity (EVE)
sensitivities are set within the Risk Appetite Framework approved
by the Supervisory Board. Please see details in Interest Rate Risk
in Note 22.
Interest rate risk in JSC TBC Bank
is managed by the Balance Sheet Management division and the
Treasury department and is monitored by the ALCO. The ALCO decides
on actions that are necessary for effective interest rate risk
management and follows up on their implementation. The Financial
Risk Management division is responsible for developing guidelines
and policy documents and setting the risk appetite for interest
rate risk. The major aspects of interest rate risk management
development and the respective reporting are periodically provided
to the Management Board, the Supervisory Board, and the Risk
Committee.
To minimize interest rate risk, the
Bank regularly monitors interest rate (re-pricing) gaps by
currencies and, in case of need, decides to enter into interest
rate derivatives contracts.
Furthermore, many of the Bank's
loans to customers contain a clause allowing it to adjust the
interest rate on the loan in case of adverse interest rate
movements, thereby limiting exposure to interest rate risk. The
management also believes that the Group's interest rate margins
provide a reasonable buffer to mitigate the effect of a possible
adverse interest rate movement.
5.
Any decline in the Group's net interest income or net interest
margin (NIM) could lead to a reduction in profitability, impacting
the accumulation of organic capital.
Risk description
Net interest income accounts for
most of the Group's total income. Potential new regulations, along
with a high level of competition in Georgia and Uzbekistan,
may negatively impact the Group's net interest margin. At the same
time, the cost of funding is largely exogenous to the Group and is
derived from both local and international markets.
In 1H 2024, NIM amounted to 6.4%, a
decrease of 0.2pp YoY, primarily due to a reduction in loan yields
in GEL because of the impact of the monetary easing policy and FX
funding composition. However, Uzbekistan continues to contribute
positively to the Group
NIM.
Risk mitigation
The Group continues to focus on the
growth of fee and commission income, driven by increased efforts
towards customer experience-related initiatives and innovative
products in both the Georgian and Uzbekistan markets. This
safeguards the Group from potential margin compressions on lending
and deposit products in the future. Additionally, the scale-up of
operations in Uzbekistan prevents a decrease in NIM on a Group
level and ensures the diversification of income streams, aligning
with the Group's profitability goals in compliance with the
strategy and medium-term targets.
To meet its asset-liability
objectives and manage the interest rate risk, the Group uses a
high-quality investment securities portfolio, long-term funding,
and derivative contracts.
6.
The Group's performance may be compromised by adverse developments
in the economic environment.
Risk description
A potential slowdown in economic
growth in Georgia or Uzbekistan will likely have an adverse impact
on the repayment capacity of borrowers, restraining their future
investment and expansion plans. Negative macroeconomic developments
could compromise the Group's performance in various ways, such as
exchange rate depreciation, a sizable decline in gold prices, a
spike in interest rates, rising unemployment, a decrease in
household disposable income, falling property prices, worsening
loan collateralisation, or falling debt service capabilities of
companies as a result of decreasing sales. Potential political and
economic instability in Georgia's or Uzbekistan's neighbouring
countries and main trading/economic partners could negatively
affect their economic outlook through worsening current and
financial accounts in the balance of payments (e.g. decreased
exports, tourism inflows, remittances and foreign direct
investments).
After two years of consecutive
double-digit expansion, Georgia's economic growth moderated
somewhat, though, remained still strong at 7.5% in 2023. The trend
of only gradual moderation of record-high currency inflows driven
by the post-pandemic recovery, commodity price shocks, and
redirection of trade and migration flows due to the
Russian-Ukrainian war appears to be persisting in 2024 as well. At
the same time, while external trade slightly moderated, the
domestic demand and conventional tourism remained resilient, while
migration-related spending stabilized, the combination of these
factors resulting in a very strong 9.0% average annual economic
growth in the first half of 2024. As the disinflationary
pass-through from international markets gradually dried up and
import prices stabilized, the consumer price dynamics became more
domestically driven, causing the tamed CPI inflation to start
normalizing towards the NBG target, standing at 2.2% YoY in June
2024. Broadly resilient inflows enabled the GEL to remain stable
throughout the most of the first half of the year, allowing the NBG
to purchase USD 287 million from the FX market in the January-April
period. However, starting from May, mostly driven by the worsened
sentiments, the GEL depreciated slightly, standing at 2.81 GEL per
USD as of June 30. Curbing the excess volatility, the NBG supplied
around USD 220 million to the market in May and June. The gross
international reserves as of June 2024 stood at USD 4.6 billion. At
the same time, the central bank delivered three rate cuts
throughout the first half of 2024, decreasing the monetary policy
rate from 9.5% to 8.0%.
Uzbekistan, the second country of
the Group's operations, also demonstrated solid economic activity,
with 6.4% real GDP growth in the first half of 2024. As in Georgia,
the annual inflation started to accelerate in Uzbekistan,
increasing from 8.8% in December 2023 to 10.6% in June 2024, while
the CBU kept its monetary policy rate unchanged at 14.0% throughout
the period. External trade growth has moderated as exports of goods
increased by 0.4% and imports by 8.0% YoY. After dropping from the
high levels of 2022 in the last year, remittances to Uzbekistan
increased by 25% YoY according to the CBU, while the share of
Russia notably moderated. The USD/UZS maintained its slight
depreciation trend until around the middle of May, when it started
appreciating and then stabilized at broadly the same level,
standing at 12,555 at the end of June 2024. In terms of REER
against Uzbekistan's main trade partners' currencies the UZS only
marginally, though, still gained some value in the first half of
the year.
Risk mitigation
To decrease its vulnerability to
economic cycles, the Group identifies cyclical industries and
proactively manages its underwriting approach and clients within
its Risk Appetite Framework. The Group has in place a macroeconomic
monitoring process that relies on close, recurrent observation of
the economic developments in Georgia and neighbouring countries to
identify early warning signals indicating imminent economic risks.
This system allows the Group to promptly assess significant
economic and political events and analyse their implications for
the Group's performance. These implications are duly translated
into specific action plans with regards to reviewing underwriting
standards, risk appetite metrics and limits, including the limits
for each of the most vulnerable industries. Additionally, the
stress testing and scenario analysis conducted during the credit
review and portfolio-monitoring processes enable the Group to
evaluate the impact of macroeconomic shocks on its business in
advance. Resilience towards a changing macroeconomic environment is
incorporated into the Group's credit underwriting standards. As
such, borrowers are expected to withstand certain adverse economic
developments through prudent financials, debt-servicing
capabilities and conservative collateral coverage.
Taking into account the regional
crisis, the Group adjusted its Risk Management Framework,
leveraging its pre-existing stress testing practices. This included
more thorough and frequent monitoring of the portfolio as well as
stress testing, to ensure close control of changes in capital,
liquidity, and portfolio quality in times of increased
uncertainty.
NON-FINANCIAL RISKS
1.
The Group is exposed to regulatory and enforcement action
risk.
Risk description
The Group's activities are highly
regulated and thus face regulatory risk. In Georgia, the NBG sets
lending limits and other economic ratios (including, but not
limited to, lending, liquidity, and investment ratios) along with
the mandatory capital adequacy ratio. In addition to complying with
the minimum reserves and financial ratios, the Bank is required to
submit periodic reports. It is also subject to the Georgian tax
code and other relevant laws.
As a consequence of the
Company's listing on the London Stock Exchange's premium segment,
the Group became subject to increased regulations from the UK
Financial Conduct Authority. In addition to its banking operations,
the Group also offers other regulated financial services products,
including leasing, insurance, and brokerage services. As a result
of its expansion into Uzbekistan, the Group's regulatory compliance
requirements have increased. Uzbekistan has a highly regulated
banking environment.
The Group is also subject to
financial covenants in its debt agreements. For more information,
see the Group's Audited Financial Statements.
Risk mitigation
The Group has established systems
and processes to ensure full regulatory compliance, which are
embedded in all levels of the Group's operations. The Group's
"three lines of defence" model defines the roles and
responsibilities for risk management.
The first line of defence is
responsible for compliance risk, strongly supported by the Bank's
compliance department as the second line of defence. The Chief
Compliance Officer oversees compliance within the Bank and reports
quarterly to the relevant committee of the Supervisory Board, with
a managerial reporting line to the CEO. The Group's Audit Committee
is responsible for ensuring regulatory compliance at the Board
level.
The Bank's compliance programme
provides compliance policies, trainings, risk-based oversight and
ensures compliance with regulatory requirements.
The Bank's Compliance Department
manages regulatory risk by:
· ensuring that applicable changes in laws and regulations are
implemented by the process owners in a timely manner;
· participating in the new product/process risk approval
process;
· conducting analysis of customer complaints, the operational
risk event database, internal audit findings and litigation cases
to proactively reveal process weaknesses; and
· conducting an annual compliance risk assessment (RCSA) of
internal processes.
The Bank's Compliance Department
ensures that all outcomes of the above mentioned analysis and
processes are addressed in a timely and appropriate manner.
Additionally, as a second line of defence the Compliance Department
defines the risk metrics and monitors them at the frequencies
defined by the Bank's Risk Appetite Framework. The Compliance
Department is responsible for escalating breaches of defined limits
to the relevant boards.
2.
The Group is exposed to legal risk.
Risk description
Legal risk refers to the potential
for loss, whether financial or reputational, resulting from
penalties, damages, fines, or other forms of financial detriment,
which impacts or could impact one or more entities of the Group
and/or its employees, business lines, operations, products and/or
its services, and results from the failure of the Group to meet its
legal obligations, including regulatory, contractual or
non-contractual requirements.
Risk mitigation
The legal function as a second line
of defence is an independent function hierarchically integrated
with all the Group's legal teams. The Group's businesses and lines
have responsibility for identifying and escalating legal risk in
their area to the legal function.
The legal function is entrusted
with the responsibility of (a) managing (including prevention)
legal risks; and (b) interpreting the laws and regulations
applicable to the Group's activities and providing legal advice and
guidance to the Group. The management of the legal risks includes
defining the relevant legal risk policies, developing Group-wide
risk appetite for legal risk, and oversight of the implementation
of controls to manage and escalate legal risk. The advisory
responsibility of the legal function is to provide legal advice to
Executive Officers and the Board of Directors in a manner that
meets the highest standards.
The senior management of the legal
function oversees, challenges and monitors the legal risk profile
and effectiveness of the legal risk control environment across the
Group. The legal risk profile and control environment are reviewed
by management through business risk committees and control
committees. The Group Risk Committee is the most senior executive
body responsible for reviewing and monitoring the effectiveness of
legal risk management across the Group.
3.
The Group's operational complexity generates operational risk that
could in turn adversely impact profitability and
reputation.
Risk description
One of the main risks that the
Group faces is operational risk, which is the risk of loss
resulting from internal and external fraud events, inadequate
processes or products, business disruptions and systems failures,
human error or damages to assets. Operational risk also implies
losses driven by legal, compliance, or cybersecurity
risks.
The Group is exposed to many types
of operational risk, including: fraudulent and other internal and
external criminal activities; breakdowns in processes, controls or
procedures; and system failures or cyber-attacks from an external
party with the intention of making the Group's services or
supporting infrastructure unavailable to its intended users, which
in turn may jeopardize sensitive information and the financial
transactions of the Group, its clients, counterparties, or
customers.
Moreover, the Group is subject to
risks that cause disruption to systems performing critical
functions or business disruption arising from events wholly or
partially beyond its control, such as natural disasters, transport
or utility failures, etc., which may result in losses or reductions
in service to customers and/or economic losses to the
Group.
The operational risks discussed
above are also applicable where the Group relies on outsourcing
services from third parties. Considering the dynamic environment
and sophistication of both banking services and possible
fraudsters, the importance of constantly improving processes,
controls, procedures and systems is heightened to ensure risk
prevention and reduce the risk of loss to the Group.
The increased complexity and
diversification of operations, coupled with the digitalisation of
the banking sector, mean that fraud risks are evolving. External
fraud events may arise from the actions of third parties against
the Group, most frequently involving events related to banking
cards, loans, and client phishing. Internal fraud events arise from
actions committed by the Group's employees, although such events
happen less frequently. During the reporting period, the Group
faced several instances of fraud, none of which had a material
impact on the Group's profit and loss statement. The rapid growth
in digital crime has exacerbated the threat of fraud, with
fraudsters adopting new techniques and approaches to obtain funds
illegally. Therefore, unless properly monitored and managed, the
potential impact could become substantial.
Risk mitigation
To oversee and mitigate operational
risk, the Group maintains an Operational Risk Management Framework,
which is an overarching document that outlines the general
principles for effective operational risk management and defines
the roles and responsibilities of the various parties involved in
the process. Policies and procedures enabling the effective
management of operational risks complement the framework. The
Management Board ensures a strong internal control culture within
the Group, where control activities are an integral part of
operations. The Board sets the operational risk appetite and
compliance with the established risk appetite limits is monitored
regularly by the Risk Committee of the Board.
The Group utillises the three lines
of defence principle, where the operational risk management
department serves as a second line of defence, responsible for
implementing the framework and appropriate policies and
methodologies to enable the Group to manage operational
risks.
The Group actively monitors,
detects, and prevents risks arising from operational risk events
and has permanent monitoring processes in place to detect unusual
activities or process weaknesses in a timely manner. The risk and
control self-assessment exercise (RCSA) focuses on identifying
residual risks in key processes, subject to the respective
corrective actions. Through our continuous efforts to monitor and
mitigate operational risks, coupled with the high level of
sophistication of our internal processes, the Group ensures the
timely identification and control of operational risk-related
activities.Various policies, processes, and procedures are in place
to control and mitigate operational risks, including, but not
limited to:
· the
Group's Risk Assessment Policy, which enables thorough risk
evaluation prior to the adoption of new products, services, or
procedures;
· the
Group's Outsourcing Risk Management Policy, which enables the Group
to control outsourcing (vendor) risk arising from adverse events
and risk concentrations due to failures in vendor selection,
insufficient controls and oversight over a vendor and/or services
provided by a vendor, and other impacts on the vendor;
· The
Risk and Control Self-Assessment (RCSA) Policy, which enables the
Group to continuously evaluate existing and potential risks,
establish risk mitigation strategies and systematically monitor the
progress of risk mitigation plans. The completion of these plans is
also part of the respective managers' key performance
indicators;
· The
Group's Operational Risk Event Identification Policy, which enables
the Group to promptly report on operational risk events, perform
systematic root-cause analysis of such events, and take corrective
measures to prevent the recurrence of significant losses. A unified
operational loss database enhances further quantitative and
qualitative analysis. The Operational Risk Event Identification
Policy also oversees the occurrence of IT incidents and the
respective activities targeted at solving the identified
problems;
· The
Group's Operational Risk Awareness Programme, which provides
regular trainings to the Group's employees and strengthens the
Group's internal risk culture;
· The
Group also utilises risk transfer strategies, including obtaining
various insurance policies to transfer the risks of critical
operational losses.
The Operational Risk Management
Department has reinforced its risk assessment teams and
methodologies to further fine-tune the existing control
environment. The same applies to the set of actions aimed at
homogenising operational risk management processes throughout the
Group's member companies.
During the reporting period, one of
the key operational risk management focus areas was the Risk and
Control Self-Assessment (RCSA) exercise, under which the Group's
top priority processes were reviewed and areas of improvement were
identified.
Moreover, to further mitigate
operational risks driven by fraudulent activities, the Group has
introduced a sophiticated ditigal fraud prevention system, which
analyses client behaviour to further minimise external fraud
threats.
The Operational Risk Management
Framework and its complementary policies were updated to ensure
effective execution of the operational risk management
programme.
4.
The Group's digitally oriented operational footprint faces a
growing and evolving threat of cyber-attacks.
Risk description
The Group's rising dependency on IT
systems increases its exposure to potential cyber-attacks. Given
their increasing sophistication, potential cyber-attacks may lead
to significant security breaches. Such risks change rapidly and
require continued focus and investment.
No material cyber-security breaches
have happened at the Bank in recent years, however, one of the
bank's software suppliers faced a ransomware attack. We received
timely information about the incident and responded in accordance
with our incident response procedures. After conducting thorough
analysis and investigations, we confirmed that there was no risk to
the bank's infrastructure, software, or production services. While
we investigated and responded to the incident, only some new
feature development processes experienced delays. The development
process was reinstated once we ensured that the vendors had fully
resolved the incident and its root causes.
Risk mitigation
The Group has in place a
comprehensive system in place to mitigate the risk of
cyber-attacks, as described below.
Threat landscape
In order to adequately address the
challenges posed by cyberattacks, we are continuously analysing the
Group's cyber threat landscape and assessing all relevant threat
scenarios and actors, considering their intentions and
capabilities, as well as the tactics, techniques, and procedures
they are using or may use during their campaigns. Our focus is to
be prepared against Advanced Persistent Threats. Among the many
different threat vectors we are covering and monitoring, the top
four are below:
· Attacks against internet facing applications and
infrastructure;
· Software supply chain attacks;
· Phishing attacks against our customers;
· Phishing attacks against our employees.
Our vision and strategic objectives
Information and cyber security are
an integral part of the Group's governance practices and strategic
development. The Group's cyber security vision and strategy is
fully aligned with its business vision and strategy and addresses
all the challenges identified during the threat landscape
analysis.
Our vision is to strengthen our
security in depth approach, enable secure and innovative
businesses, and maintain a continuous improvement cycle. Our
strategic objectives are:
· To
maintain our defence in depth approach by strengthening the team
and implementing cutting-edge technologies, in order to maintain
resilience against Advanced Persistent Threats, which may come from
state-sponsored actors or organised cybercriminals;
· To
maintain compliance with industry leading information and cyber
security standards, sustain a continuous improvement cycle for our
information and business continuity management systems, and be one
step ahead of regulatory requirements; and
· To
optimize and automate security processes, and provide security
services seamlessly to the Group's business (where
possible).
Our security in depth approach and cyber-resilience
program
In order to follow our vision and
achieve our strategic objectives, we run effective information and
cyber security programmes, functions and systems, as
follows:
· Layered preventive controls are in place, covering all
relevant logical and physical segments and layers of the
organisation and infrastructure in order to minimise the likelihood
of successful initial access:
o Data security controls
o Identity and access controls
o Endpoint security controls
o Infrastructure security controls
o Application security controls
o Internal and perimeter network security controls
o Physical security controls
· A
professional team is in charge of effectively implementing,
assuring the effectiveness of, maintaining and fine-tuning the
preventive controls mentioned above. The number and level of
expertise of the team members is significant. Our team members hold
industry leading certificates and work on a daily basis to
strengthen and extend their professional skill sets.
· Layers of preventive controls in conjunction with a
comprehensive awareness programme provide the best combination in
order to minimise the likelihood of successful attacks. Our robust
awareness programme helps employees and customers to improve their
cyber hygiene, understand the risks associated with their actions,
identify cyberattacks they might face during day-to-day operations,
and improve the overall risk culture. Our awareness program
provides relevant materials to all key roles, from the Management
Board to IT engineers and developers. It covers annual trainings
and attestations for all employees, newcomer trainings and
attestations, social engineering simulations, security tips and
notifications for all employees, security awareness raising
campaigns for customers, and more.
· Since we believe that 100% prevention is not achievable, the
Group has threat hunting capabilities and a security operations
centre in place to monitor every possible anomaly in near real-time
that is identified across the organisation's network in order to
detect potential incidents and respond in a timely and effective
manner to minimise the negative impact of possible attacks. To be
up-to-date and track the techniques and tactics of our adversaries,
we are elaborating cyber threat intelligence procedures according
to industry best practices and following the MITRE ATTACK
framework.
· Information security governance and effective risk management
processes ensure that the Bank has the correct guidance, makes
risk-informed decisions in compliance with its risk appetite,
complies with regulatory requirements and achieves a continuous
improvement cycle. The Information Security Committee, which is
chaired by the CEO, has the ultimate responsibility to assure that
an appropriate level of security is maintained and a continuous
improvement cycle of management processes is achieved. The Bank is
in compliance with the NIST Cyber Security Management Framework and
its Information Security Management System is ISO 27001
certified.
· On
top of all of the above, the Bank further strengthens its cyber
resilience through an effective Business Continuity Management
System and cyber insurance policy, in order to manage contingencies
and recover from serious disruptions with minimum possible
impact.
How we measure and assure an acceptable level of
security
To assess and assure an acceptable
level of information and cyber security, we rely on
external/internal audit reports, red teaming exercise reports, and
the results of penetration tests, which are conducted by our high
professional internal team and reputable external third party
partners.
· On
an annual basis we conduct:
o An external audit of SWIFT Customer Protection
Framework;
o An external audit of the NBG's Cyber Security Framework,
which is based on the NIST Cyber Security Management
Framework;
o External surveillance audits of ISO 27001;
o Penetration tests against internet facing applications and
critical infrastructure with help of our highly reputable
partners.
· Our
internal team is in charge of continuous penetration tests of
internal and external applications and infrastructure.
· We
conduct regular red and purple teaming exercises and assess our
security capabilities against real world advanced threat
actors.
5.
The Group identifies risk in its growing dependence on
data.
Risk description
In the domain of data management
and data governance within the Group, two prominent risks are
noteworthy, each presenting unique challenges to the preservation
and efficacy of the Group's information assets. The first risk
centres on the imperative need for data quality, a cornerstone for
sound decision-making, regulatory compliance, and overall risk
management. This challenge emanates from diverse sources,
encompassing errors during data entry, the lack of standardised
formats, and inconsistencies across data sources. The ramifications
of compromised data quality include financial losses, operational
inefficiencies, regulatory non-compliance, and reputational damage.
The complexity is further heightened in dynamic market
environments, necessitating robust mechanisms for data validation
and cleansing.
Simultaneously, the Group confronts
a second pivotal risk associated with outdated and sometimes
obsolete infrastructure. Legacy systems, characterized by outdated
hardware and software, present a formidable challenge by impeding
the seamless flow of data and obstructing the adoption of
cutting-edge technologies. The risk intensifies with the rapid pace
of technological advancements, rendering legacy infrastructure
susceptible to security vulnerabilities and compliance issues.
Moreover, the limited scalability of outdated systems constrains
the Group 's ability to process and analyse vast datasets
efficiently, thereby impinging on the agility required for informed
decision-making in the fast-paced financial landscape.
Risk mitigation
Mitigating these data risks
requires a holistic and strategic approach tailored to the Group.
To address the challenge of data quality, the Bank is adopting
advanced data quality management systems, implementing data
profiling techniques, and enforces stringent data governance
policies. Strategic investments in technologies like machine
learning and artificial intelligence can automate the detection and
correction of data anomalies, fostering a proactive stance towards
maintaining accurate and consistent data. Cultivating a data-driven
culture within the organisation, along with clear data lineage and
documentation practices, enhances transparency and
traceability.
In tackling the risks associated
with outdated infrastructure, the Group has embarked on a strategic
and phased modernization approach. Investing in state-of-the-art
technologies such as cloud computing and virtualization is
imperative for increased flexibility, scalability, and security. A
comprehensive assessment of the existing infrastructure, coupled
with a roadmap for migration and upgrades, enables a systematic
transition without disrupting critical operations. Embracing DevOps
practices facilitates continuous integration and deployment,
fostering a culture of agility and adaptability. Through these
proactive measures, the Group is positioning itself to capitalise
on emerging opportunities while effectively mitigating the risks
associated with both compromised data quality and outdated
technological foundations.
6.
The Group is exposed to Model Risk.
Risk description
Statistical, machine learning and
artificial intelligence models are increasingly used in key
business processes due to the rapid adoption of big data
technologies and advanced data modelling techniques. In line with
regulatory guidance and best practices, the Group defines a model
as a quantitative method, system, or approach that applies
statistical, economic, financial, or mathematical theories,
techniques, and assumptions to process input data into quantitative
estimates. The Group has also developed model identification
standards to operationalise the model definition.
Increasing reliance on models
increases the need for proactive model risk management. The Group
defines model risk as a risk of adverse consequences (e.g.,
financial loss, reputational damage, etc.) arising from decisions
based on incorrectly developed, implemented, or used
models.
Risk mitigation
The Model Risk Management (MRM)
function is the second line of defence and is responsible for
identifying, measuring, and managing model risk in the Group. MRM
is organized around two components - governance and validation. The
governance component of MRM develops and implements the policy,
risk appetite and standards that define the roles and
responsibilities of the different stakeholders and encompass all
phases of the model lifecycle, from planning and development to
initial model validation, model use, model monitoring, ongoing
model validation and model retirement. It is also responsible for
managing the model inventory and keeping model risk within the risk
appetite. The validation component of the MRM is responsible for
conceptual and technical model validations in line with the policy
and standards developed and implemented by the governance
component.
To mitigate model risk, the MRM
function uses a risk-based approach during model validation
processes. Model risk is identified during initial and ongoing
model validations. Countermeasures to mitigate model risk and keep
it within the risk appetite depend on the nature of the identified
risk and can include actions like increasing validation frequency
and/or depth, and calibration or redevelopment of the
model.
7.
The Group remains exposed to reputational risk.
Risk description
There are reputational risks to
which the Group may be exposed, such as country risks related to
international sanctions imposed on Russia in response to the war in
Ukraine, relations with correspondent banks and international
financial institutions. There are risks of phishing, other
cybercrimes, and temporary service interruptions, which can be
viewed as reputational risks due to the increasing digitalisation
of services that the Group provides. There may also be isolated
cases of anti-banking narratives in the mass media, which
particularly intensify in the run-up to elections. However, most of
these risks are not unique to the Group as they apply to the entire
banking sector.
Risk mitigation
To mitigate the possibility of
reputational risks, the Group works continuously to maintain strong
brand recognition among its stakeholders. The Group follows all
relevant external and internal policies and procedures and
prevention mechanisms to minimise the impact of direct and indirect
reputational risks. The Group monitors its brand value through
public opinion studies and surveys and by receiving feedback from
stakeholders on an ongoing basis. Dedicated internal and external
marketing and communications teams actively monitor mainstream
media and social media coverage on a daily basis. These teams
monitor risks and develop prevention policies, risk scenarios, and
contingency plans. The Group tries to identify early warning signs
of potential reputational or brand damage in order to mitigate and
elevate them to the attention of the Board before they escalate. A
special Task Force is in place at the top management level,
comprised of the management, strategic communications, marketing
and legal teams to manage reputational risks when they occur.
Communications and cyber security teams conduct extensive
awareness-raising campaigns on cyber security and financial
literacy, involving the media, the Banking Association of Georgia
and Edufin (TBC's inhouse financial education platform), aimed at
mitigating and preventing cyber threats and phishing
cases.
8.
The Group faces the risk that its strategic initiatives do not
translate into long-term sustainable value for its
stakeholders.
Risk description
The Group may face the risk of
developing a business strategy that ensures sustained value
creation, adapting to evolving customer needs, heightened
competition, and regulatory restrictions. Additionally,
uncertainties from economic and social disruptions, such as the
ongoing war in Ukraine and the developing market in Uzbekistan, may
hinder the Group's timely execution of its strategy, potentially
compromising its capacity for long-term value creation.
Risk mitigation
To mitigate the combined risks from
a local and international perspective, the Group employs a
multifaceted approach.
The formation of our strategic
portfolio is primarily driven by the Group's strategy to broaden
and diversify our business revenue streams. Thorough curation is
conducted in the execution of strategy involving the Board, the
executive management, and middle management. These sessions serve
as crucial checkpoints to ensure alignment with our strategic
long-term objectives and our company's guiding principles that
steer our course.
Moreover, monitoring of the
performance of strategic projects extends to quarterly analyses and
tracking of metrics used to measure strategy execution. In cases of
significant deviations, corrective or mitigation actions are
promptly implemented.
9.
The Group is exposed to risks related to its ability to attract and
retain highly qualified employees.
Risk description
As the Group becomes increasingly
digitally focused, it requires more IT professionals in its various
departments. This shift accentuates the risk of potentially losing
key personnel. In the highly competitive tech job market, this
challenge extends not only to retaining these valuable employees
but also to attracting, developing, and keeping new skilled
workers. Ensuring these employees align with the Group's objectives
is vital. The situation calls for strategic planning in human
resources to effectively manage this risk while supporting the
Group's digital evolution.
Risk mitigation
The aim of the Group is to adapt to
the rapidly changing business environment, increase leadership
capabilities, achieve a high level of engagement among employees,
and equip them with the necessary skills. To this end, the Group
actively monitors the labour market both in Georgia and abroad,
proactively recruiting the best candidates and expanding its
networks of key personnel. We create a robust international talent
pipeline by regularly engaging with potential candidates, including
passive job seekers with diverse profiles. We work on
building an attractive international hiring brand.The Group treats
all employees equally and fairly, supporting and coaching them to
succeed.
We equip our people with the tools
and frameworks for continuous learning, supported by a constant
feedback loop. We give our staff an opportunity to grow and expand
internationally. We have a Succession Planning Framework developed
for senior positions in order to ensure a smooth transition and to
offer promotion opportunities to employees. In addition, we have
launched a Talent Management Framework, ensuring the constant
identification of talented staff and monitoring their development
within the Group.
We monitor human capital risks and
measure efficiency using the following metrics: Employee turnover
and retention, Quality of hire, Mobility rate, Employee Net
Promoter Score (ENPS) - engagement, Employee Pulse surveys, Key
employee metrics, Performance management and Individual Development
Plans (IDPs), Customer Net Promoter Score (NPS). In terms of
compensation, we conduct multiple salary market studies to ensure
we provide competitive conditions for our employees
The Group reviews and updates
organizational policies to ensure they are inclusive and equitable.
This includes flexible work arrangements, accommodations for
diverse needs, and inclusive benefits packages.
Since its establishment in 2019,
our internal IT Academy has been a hub for technological education,
offering a diverse array of courses in front-end, back-end
development, DevOps, test automation, and other critical topics.
These courses are accessible at no cost to both our employees and
potential candidates. Under the guidance of experienced staff and
industry professionals, the Academy has successfully trained over
1,500 individuals from outside the organization and 1,700 within
it. This initiative has resulted in the recruitment of 330 skilled
professionals to TBC Group, thereby enhancing the overall IT
ecosystem in the country.
In 2023, our IT Academy launched a
collaborative project with USAID, focused on empowering women in
the regional areas of Georgia. The project aims to train over 700
participants through nine newly designed courses, led by top
industry experts, lecturers, and mentors. Additionally, the IT
Academy has introduced an iOS Laboratory, providing students
without access to Apple products the opportunity to study at no
cost.
10. The Group is exposed to conduct risk.
Risk description
Conduct risk is defined as the risk
of failing to achieve fair outcomes for customers and other
stakeholders. The Bank's Code of Ethics serves as a moral compass
for all staff and sets high ethical standards that each employee is
required to uphold. The Bank's employees undertake and perform
their responsibilities with honesty and integrity. They are
critical to maintaining trust and confidence in its operations and
upholding important values of trust, loyalty, prudence and
care.
Additionally, the Bank's management
understands that it bears responsibility for a diversified group of
domestic and international investors, and needs to embrace the
rules and mechanisms to protect customers and maintain the
confidence of investors and financial markets. The Group's
directors strive to establish the "tone from the top", which sets
out the messages describing and illustrating the core components of
good conduct.
Risk mitigation
In managing conduct risk, the Bank
entrusts different departments and divisions with carrying out the
task of managing, mitigating, and eliminating conduct risk across
all of the Bank's operations with clients and other stakeholders.
The Compliance, Human Capital and Operational Risk departments
cooperate to create a unified conduct Risk Management Framework and
assist business lines and departments, in the following
ways:
1.
Developing and maintaining policies and procedures to ensure that
individual employees and departments comply with regulatory
provisions, best practices, the Code of Conduct, and the Code of
Ethics;
2.
Maintaining liaison with the Compliance Department, administering
policies and procedures in conjunction with the compliance
department and investigating complaints about the conduct of the
department, its manager, or its employees;
3. The
front-line employees of the organization should ensure that product
information is accurate and complete, and is conveyed both in
writing and orally in a simple, understandable manner, regardless
of the level of sophistication of the client;
4. Keeping
records of client interactions and emails containing sensitive and
sales-related information, such as information in relation to the
acquisition of new clients and the formulation of complex product
offers;
5. By
providing periodic training to all employees regarding evolving
compliance standards within the Group, we ensure that new employees
are educated regarding proper conduct;
6. By
creating a culture of openness that encourages employees to speak
out without fear of punishment, we are preventing and detecting
conflicts of interest, creating moral incentive programmes,
creating bonuses, and achieving a risk-adequate incentive and
disciplinary policy for the Group;
7.
Investing considerable time and effort in investigating, analysing,
implementing, and monitoring sales and after-sales activities, and
putting proper conduct into the required job skills, which ensures
that conduct risk is not just managed by risk management units,
including compliance departments.
EMERGING RISKS
The Group recognizes its exposure to risks arising from
climate change.
Risk description
The risks associated with climate
change have both a physical impact, arising from more frequent and
severe weather changes, and a transitional impact that may entail
extensive policy, legal, and technological changes to reduce the
ecological footprint of households and businesses. For the Group,
both risks could materialise through impaired asset values and the
deteriorating creditworthiness of our customers, which could result
in a reduction of the Group's profitability. The Group may also
become exposed to reputational risks because of its lending to, or
other business operations with, customers deemed to be contributing
to climate change.
Risk mitigation
The Group has in place an
Environmental and Climate Change Policy. The policy governs
its Environmental Management System ("EMS") and ensures that the
Group's operations adhere to the applicable environmental, health,
safety, and labor regulations and practices. We take all reasonable
steps to support our customers in fulfilling their environmental
and social responsibilities. The management of environmental and
social risks is embedded in the Group's lending process through the
application of the EMS. The Group has developed risk management
procedures to identify, assess, manage, and monitor environmental
and social risks. These procedures are fully integrated in the
Group's credit risk management process. To identify, assess and
manage risks associated with climate change, the Group introduced
an overall climate risk assessment and conducted a general analysis
to understand the maturity level of the climate-related framework.
The general analysis process covered assessment of the existing
policies and procedures, identification of areas for further
development, and gap analysis. Based on the analysis, the main
focus areas were identified and reflected in the climate action
strategy, considering the Group's business strategy. Furthermore,
our Environmental and Climate Change Policy is fully compliant with
local environmental legislation and follows international best
practices (the full policy is available at www.tbcbankgroup.com).
In order to increase our
understanding of climate-related risks to the Bank's loan
portfolio, the Bank performed a high-level sectoral risk
assessment, since different sectors might be vulnerable to
different climate-related risks over different time horizons. In
2022, we advanced our TCFD framework further, especially in
strategic planning and risk management, and performed climate
stress testing. In 2023, we reviewed our climate stress testing
model in order to consider new approaches, where available. For
more details, please see the Annual Report 2023, pages
140-164.
The Bank aims to increase its
understanding of climate-related risks and their longer-term
impacts over the coming years, which will enable it to further
develop its approach to mitigation. Furthermore, the Group's
portfolio has strong collateral coverage, with around 75% of the
loan book collateralised with cash, real estate, or gold. Since the
collateral evaluation procedure includes monitoring, any need to
change collateral values arises from our regular collateral
monitoring process.
In June 2024, the Group released
its full-scale sustainability report for the year 2023 in
accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) standards.
The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) helps the private sector to
understand and realise its role and influence on sustainable
development issues such as climate change, human rights and
governance. The report is designed for all interested parties and
groups in Georgia and abroad and aims to give them clear,
fact-based information about the social, economic, and
environmental impact of our activities in 2023. It presents our
endeavours to create value for our employees, clients, suppliers,
partners, and society as a whole. The Sustainability Report 2023 is
available at www.tbcbankgroup.com.
At the executive level,
responsibility for ESG and climate-related matters is assigned to
the ESG Steering Committee, which was established by the Management
Board in March 2021 and is responsible for implementing the ESG and
climate action strategy and approving detailed annual and other
action plans for key projects. The ESG Committee meets on a
quarterly basis.
In January 2022, the Group
established an Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) and
Ethics Committee at the Board level, as well as at the Supervisory
Board level in line with the Company's "mirror boards" structure.
This reflects the importance of sustainability in TBC's corporate
governance and allows Board members to dedicate more time and focus
to ESG topics. The Committee provides strategic guidance on
climate-related matters and reports to the Board, which has overall
oversight. For more details about the management of ESG matters,
please see our ESG strategy section on pages 38-40 of the Annual
Report 2023.
Selected regulations on Financial Risks
Capital adequacy
The Group's objectives in terms of
capital management are to maintain appropriate levels of capital to
support the business strategy, meet regulatory and stress
testing-related requirements, and safeguard the Group's ability to
continue as a going concern.
The Group complied with all its
internally and externally imposed capital requirements throughout
the first half of 2024.
Georgian subsidiary - JSC TBC Bank
In December 2017, the NBG adopted
amendments to the regulations relating to capital adequacy
requirements. The changes include amendments to the regulation on
capital adequacy requirements for commercial banks, and the
introduction of new requirements (i) on additional capital buffer
requirements for commercial banks within Pillar 2; (ii) on the
determination of the countercyclical buffer rate; and (iii) on the
identification of systematically important banks and determining
systemic buffer requirements. The purpose of these amendments is to
improve the quality of banks' regulatory capital and achieve better
compliance with the Basel III framework.
In 2020-2022, the NBG developed the
concept and changes for the transition to IFRS. In January 2023, in
line with the finalisation of the IFRS transition process, the NBG
adopted amendments to the regulations relating to capital adequacy
requirements. According to the new amendments, commercial banks
must comply with supervisory regulations with IFRS-based numbers
and approaches. Under the IFRS transition process, the NBG
introduced a credit risk adjustment (CRA) buffer. The CRA buffer
was implemented as a Pillar 2 requirement and was fully set on CET
1 capital.
In January 2023, the NBG made
amendments to the systemic risk buffer calculation methodology.
According to the new methodology, the current systemic risk buffer
for JSC TBC Bank amounts 2.5% and can be increased by 0.5% if the
Bank's non-banking deposits market share in the previous
three-month period exceeds 40%. The Bank must comply with the
increased requirement in a 12-month period unless the average
market share of the previous 12-month period falls below
40%.
In March 2023, the Financial
Stability Committee of the NBG decided to set the neutral (base)
rate of the countercyclical buffer at 1%. Banks are required to
accumulate a countercyclical capital buffer according to a
predetermined schedule: 0.25% by March 2024, 0.50% by March 2025,
0.75% by March 2026 and fully phased-in 1% by March 2027. The
countercyclical buffer could be increased at times of strong credit
activity and suspended during periods of stress.
In May 2023, The NBG introduced new
requirement regarding eligible liabilities and own funds (MREL)
under Bank Recovery and Resolution Framework. According to the new
requirement, commercial banks will have to hold specific amounts of
equity and subordinated debt, and of qualifying non-deposit senior
debt that could be subject to bail-in in the event of bank failure.
However, this should not affect risks for existing senior creditors
because the bank resolution legislation in Georgia already provides
a credible mechanism for the bail-in of senior obligations.
MREL implementation will be phased in gradually, starting from 10%
of total liabilities and own funds (TLOF) on 1 January 2024, before
increasing to 15% at end-2025, and 20% at end-2027. MREL-eligible
instruments will include regulatory capital and senior unsecured
non-deposit obligations with maturities of at least one year,
subject to the National Bank of Georgia's approval.
In November 2023, the National Bank
of Georgia introduced the concept of foreseeable dividend, which
should be deducted from retained earnings. According to the
regulation, foreseeable dividend is considered to be the amount of
dividend approved or submitted for approval by the relevant entity
defined by the charter of the commercial bank (Supervisory
Board).
The following table presents the
capital adequacy ratios and minimum requirements:
|
Jun'24
|
Mar'24
|
Jun'23
|
CET 1 capital
|
4,344,472
|
4,096,919
|
3,920,004
|
Tier 1 capital
|
5,749,522
|
4,635,979
|
4,443,544
|
Tier 2 capital
|
922,217
|
654,348
|
504,286
|
Total regulatory capital
|
6,671,739
|
5,290,327
|
4,947,830
|
Risk-weighted exposures:
|
|
|
Credit Risk-weighted
exposures
|
22,459,700
|
21,334,427
|
18,796,064
|
Risk-weighted exposures for Market
Risk
|
83,580
|
24,566
|
20,085
|
Risk-weighted exposures for
Operational Risk
|
3,248,365
|
3,248,365
|
2,636,659
|
Total Risk-weighted exposures
|
25,791,645
|
24,607,358
|
21,452,808
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum CET 1 ratio
|
14.6%
|
14.5%
|
14.4%
|
CET 1 capital adequacy
ratio
|
16.8%
|
16.6%
|
18.3%
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Tier 1 ratio
|
16.9%
|
16.8%
|
16.8%
|
Tier 1 capital adequacy
ratio
|
22.3%
|
18.8%
|
20.7%
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum total capital adequacy ratio
|
20.0%
|
19.9%
|
19.9%
|
Total capital adequacy
ratio
|
25.9%
|
21.5%
|
23.1%
|
GEL volatility has been and
remains a significant risk to the Bank's capital adequacy. A 10%
GEL depreciation would translate into a 0.8pp, 0.6pp and 0.5pp drop
in the Bank's excess CET 1, Tier 1 and Total regulatory capital,
respectively.
Uzbekistan subsidiary - TBC UZ
In the management of capital, the
Bank has the following objectives: compliance with the capital
requirements established by the Central Bank of Uzbekistan (CBU)
and, in particular, the requirements of the deposit insurance
system; ensuring the Bank's ability to function as a going concern;
and maintaining the capital base at the level necessary to ensure
the compliance of the capital adequacy ratio with the requirements
of the CBU. The compliance with the capital adequacy ratio
established by the CBU is monitored monthly through the forecast
and actual data, which contain the relevant calculations and are
verified and vetted by the Bank's management.
As at 30 June 2024, the Bank met
the requirements to regulatory capital set by Regulation On the
Requirements for the Adequacy of the Capital of Commercial Banks
No. 2693 dated July 6, 2015.
Liquidity
The Group's objectives in terms of
liquidity management are to maintain appropriate levels of
liquidity to support the business strategy, meet regulatory and
stress testing-related requirements, and safeguard the Group's
ability to continue as a going concern.
The Group complied with all its
internally and externally imposed liquidity requirements half year
2024.
Georgian subsidiary - JSC TBC Bank
The Bank assesses LCR and NSFR per
NBG guidelines, whereby the ratios are implemented by the NBG have
more conservative approaches than those set by Basel III standards.
The LCR enhances short-term resilence. In addition to the total LCR
limit set at 100%, the NBG defines limits per currency for the GEL
and foreign currencies (FC). To promote larisation in Georgia, the
NBG set a lower limit for the GEL LCR than that for the FC
LCR.
The NSFR is used for long-term
liquidity risk management to promote resilience over a longer time
horizon by creating additional incentives for JSC TBC Bank to
rely on more stable sources of funding on a continuing basis. The
regulatory limit is set at 100%.
As of 30 June 2024, the ratios were
well above the prudential limits set by the NBG, as
follows:
Funding & Liquidity
|
Jun'24
|
Mar'24
|
Jun'23
|
Minimum net stable funding ratio, as defined by the
NBG
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
Net stable funding ratio as defined
by the NBG
|
118.2%
|
114.8%
|
129.8%
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum total liquidity coverage ratio, as defined by the
NBG
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
Minimum LCR in GEL, as defined by the NBG
|
75%
|
75.0%
|
75.0%
|
Minimum LCR in FC, as defined by the NBG
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
|
Total liquidity coverage ratio, as
defined by the NBG
|
118.1%
|
114.6%
|
124.5%
|
LCR in GEL, as defined by the
NBG
|
100.0%
|
114.8%
|
130.4%
|
LCR in FC, as defined by the
NBG
|
129.5%
|
114.4%
|
119.2%
|
Uzbekistan subsidiary - TBC UZ
The regulatory framework
established by the Central Bank of Uzbekistan (CBU) mandates
specific liquidity ratios for financial institutions to uphold
financial stability and mitigate potential risks. In compliance
with these regulations, financial institutions are required to
maintain a High Quality Liquid Assets/Total Assets ratio of 10%,
ensuring a sufficient buffer of liquid assets to cover a proportion
of their total assets.
Moreover, institutions are
obligated to maintain a 25% Instant Liquidity Ratio, ensuring
prompt liquidity availability for unforeseen financial obligations.
Further reinforcing risk resilience, a Liquidity Coverage Ratio
(LCR) of ≥100% is mandated, requiring sufficient high-quality
liquid assets to offset potential liquidity shortfalls during
stress periods.
Complementary to these measures,
financial entities must sustain a Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR)
of ≥100%, highlighting the need for a stable funding structure over
an extended time horizon to mitigate liquidity risks effectively.
As of 30 June 2024, the Bank met the requirements set by the
Regulator.
Market risk
The Group's objectives in terms of
market risk management are to support the business strategy, meet
regulatory and stress testing-related requirements and safeguard
the Group's ability to continue as a going concern.
The Group complied with all its
internally and externally imposed market risk requirements half
year 2024.
FX
risk
JSC TBC Bank (Georgia) and TBC Bank
Uzbekistan are required to maintain open currency positions in line
with NBG's and CBU's limits respectively.
· The
NBG requires the Bank to monitor both balance sheet and total
aggregate (including off-balance sheet) open currency positions and
to maintain the later one within 20% of the Bank's regulatory
capital.
· CBU
limits are set separately for aggregate OCP and for each foreign
currency position at 15% and 10% of UZ TBC's regulatory capital
respectively.
Interest rate risk
JSC TBC Bank (Georgia) assess
interest rate risk from both the NII and Economic Value of Equity
(EVE) perspectives. As per regulatory requirements, the Bank
assesses the impact of interest rate shock scenarios on EVE and
NII. According to NBG guidelines, the NII sensitivity under
parallel shifts of interest rate scenarios is maintained for
monitoring purposes, while EVE sensitivity is calculated under six
predefined stress scenarios of interest rate changes, with the
limit applied to the result of the worst case scenario. As of 30
June 2024, TBC Bank's EVE ratio stood at 7.78%, comfortably below
the regulatory limit (15%).
Statement of Directors' Responsibilities
The Directors are required to
prepare the condensed consolidated financial statements on a going
concern basis unless it is not appropriate. They are satisfied that
the Group has the resources to continue in business for the
foreseeable future and that the financial statements continue to be
prepared on a going concern basis.
The Directors confirm that to the
best of their knowledge:
· the
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34
'Interim Financial Reporting' as adopted by the UK, and the
Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules ('DTR') sourcebook of
the UK's Financial Conduct Authority;
· this
Interim Report 2024 gives a true, fair, balanced and understandable
view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or
loss of the Company; and
· this
Interim Report 2024 includes a fair review of the information
required by:
o DTR 4.2.7R, being an indication of: important events that
have occurred during the first six months of the financial year
ending 31 December 2024 and their impact on the condensed set of
financial statements; and a description of the principal risks and
uncertainties for the remaining six months of the financial year;
and
o DTR 4.2.8R, being: related party transactions that have taken
place in the first six months of the financial year ending
31 December 2024, which have materially affected
the financial position or performance of TBC Bank during that
period; and any changes in the related parties transactions
described in the Annual Report and Accounts 2023 that could
materially affect the financial position or performance of TBC Bank
during the first six months of the financial year ending 31
December 2024.
Signed on behalf of the Board
by:
Vakhtang Butskhrikidze
CEO
8 August
2024
TBC Bank Group PLC Board of
Directors:
Chairman
Arne Berggren
|
|
Executive Directors
Vakhtang Butskhrikidze
(CEO)
|
Non-executive Directors
Eran Klein
Tsira Kemularia
Janet Heckman
Per Anders Fasth
Thymios Kyriakopoulos
Nino Suknidze
Rajeev Sawhney
|
TBC BANK GROUP PLC
Condensed Consolidated Interim
Financial
Statements (Unaudited)
30 June 2024