PART I
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors
Not applicable.
Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
Not applicable.
Item 3. Key Information
Selected Financial Data
The following
table sets forth selected consolidated financial data for the periods indicated. This information is qualified by and should be
read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the Notes thereto included in Part III of this annual report,
as well as Item 5, ‘‘Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.’’ The selected balance sheet data as
of December 31, 2019 and 2018 and the selected income statement data for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 set
forth below have been derived from our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. Our consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. To date, we have not been required, and presently are not required
under French law, to prepare consolidated financial statements under French GAAP or IFRS, nor have we done so.
|
|
Year Ended
and at December 31,
|
In
thousands of euro, except
per
share data in euro
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME STATEMENT DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
44,912
|
|
|
|
39,183
|
|
|
|
35,746
|
|
|
|
35,611
|
|
|
|
32,253
|
|
Total netsales
|
|
|
44,859
|
|
|
|
39,163
|
|
|
|
35,686
|
|
|
|
35,579
|
|
|
|
32,218
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
21,002
|
|
|
|
16,917
|
|
|
|
14,808
|
|
|
|
16,411
|
|
|
|
13,785
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
(18,802
|
)
|
|
|
(18,232
|
)
|
|
|
(16,835
|
)
|
|
|
(16,019
|
)
|
|
|
(13,298
|
)
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
2,201
|
|
|
|
(1,315
|
)
|
|
|
(2,027
|
)
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
Basic Income (loss) from operations per common share
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
Diluted Income (loss) from operations per common
share
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
2,191
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
4,444
|
|
|
|
(907
|
)
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(679
|
)
|
|
|
(358
|
)
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
(602
|
)
|
|
|
(759
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
1,512
|
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
(681
|
)
|
|
|
3,842
|
|
|
|
(1,667
|
)
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
Dividends per share(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
29,016,118
|
|
|
|
28,997,866
|
|
|
|
28,961,928
|
|
|
|
27,823,313
|
|
|
|
25,021,966
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
29,615,466
|
|
|
|
28,997,866
|
|
|
|
28,961,928
|
|
|
|
29,365,583
|
|
|
|
25,021,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
42,097
|
|
|
|
40,376
|
|
|
|
39,574
|
|
|
|
40,502
|
|
|
|
32,992
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
4,069
|
|
|
|
4,208
|
|
|
|
3,682
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
53,068
|
|
|
|
48,740
|
|
|
|
46,897
|
|
|
|
46,591
|
|
|
|
38,581
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
17,493
|
|
|
|
16,812
|
|
|
|
16,134
|
|
|
|
15,010
|
|
|
|
16,271
|
|
Financing lease obligations, less current portion(2)
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion
|
|
|
957
|
|
|
|
1,339
|
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
3,665
|
|
|
|
4,798
|
|
Common stock, €0.13 par value; 29,433,994 and
29,368,394 shares issued and 29,141,566 and 28,997,866 shares outstanding; at December 31, 2019 and 2018 respectively
|
|
|
3,826
|
|
|
|
3,818
|
|
|
|
3,818
|
|
|
|
3,783
|
|
|
|
3,348
|
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
27,359
|
|
|
|
24,964
|
|
|
|
25,158
|
|
|
|
24,451
|
|
|
|
14,430
|
|
|
(1)
|
No
dividends were paid with respect to fiscal years 2015 through 2018 and subject to approval
of the annual shareholders’ meeting to be held in 2018 the Company does not anticipate
paying any dividend with respect to fiscal year 2019. See Item 8, ‘‘Financial
Information — Dividends and Dividend Policy.’’
|
|
(2)
|
Financing
lease obligations for 2019 and capital lease obligations for previous years
|
RISK FACTORS
In addition to the
other information contained in this annual report, the following risk factors should be carefully considered in evaluating us
and our business. These statements are intended to highlight the material risk factors that may cause actual financial, business,
research or operating results to differ materially from expectations disclosed in this annual report. See also factors disclosed
under “Cautionary statement on forward-looking information”.
Risks Relating to Our Business
Worldwide contagious, epidemic
diseases may impact our international activities and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
Epidemic, contagious and even pandemic diseases,
such as the current coronavirus, which started in China in December 2019 and has spread throughout Europe and around the world,
is expected to impact the development of our business worldwide as we have taken the previously announced steps of requiring the
majority of our employees to work remotely, maintaining minimum supply chain activity and curtailing all business travel. Further,
from April 1, 2020, our facility in Lyon, France has been closed with only minimal staff to expedite shipments of disposals at
planned intervals. The pandemic may result in further postponement and/or cancelation of the sale and installation of new devices
and disposables in hospitals or clinics situated in an infected area. These occurrences could also prevent us from servicing our
installed base of devices and we have noted cancelations of treatments in certain circumstances. The pandemic could also result
in the postponement of clinical trials using our devices. An outbreak of a contagious disease could also negatively affect hospital
admission rates and disrupt our global business, including our ability to manufacture and distribute our devices, for example
due to quarantine measures. Although we are monitoring the impact across our businesses of the recent coronavirus outbreak which
has already caused disruption of our activities, the severity of the operational and financial impact will depend on how long
and widespread the disruption proves to be. Finally, we cannot predict the impact that COVID-19 will have on our customers, suppliers
and other business partners, and the financial conditions of these actors; however, any material effect on these parties could
adversely impact us. The impact of COVID-19 may also exacerbate other risks discussed in this section, any of which could have
a material effect on us. This situation is changing rapidly and additional impacts may arise that we are not aware of currently.
We have a history of operating
losses and although we achieved profitability in 2019, it is uncertain whether we can maintain profitability in the future.
Although we achieved
operational profitability in 2019, we have incurred operating losses in 2018 and 2017 and in each previous fiscal year prior to
2015, since 1998. We expect that our marketing, selling and research and development expenses will increase as we attempt to further
develop and commercialize our lithotripsy and particularly our HIFU devices. We may not, however, generate a sufficient level
of revenue to offset these expenses and may not be able to adjust spending in a timely manner to respond to any unanticipated
decline in revenue. We cannot guarantee that we will realize sufficient revenue to sustain profitability in the future. See Item
5, ‘‘Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.’’
Our future revenue growth and
income depend, among other things, on the success of our HIFU technology.
We depend on the
success of our HIFU technology for future revenue growth and net income. In particular, we are dependent on the successful development
and commercialization of other product lines, such as medical devices based on HIFU particularly but not limited to the Focal
One, to generate significant additional revenues, achieve, and sustain profitability in the future. Our Extracorporeal Shockwave
Lithotripsy (“ESWL”) line of products competes in a mature market that has experienced overall declining unit sales
prices in recent years.
Although we are
particularly dependent on the success of our HIFU technology to grow our business, other revenues, generated by our Urology Devices
and Services (“UDS”) division and directly linked to the distribution of other complementary products on behalf of
medical companies, continue to increase significantly and contribute to our revenue growth. While we believe that our UDS division
can successfully pursue the marketing of its worldwide distribution platform, any termination of distribution commitments from
such medical third parties could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
See “—Item 4, “Information on the Company—UDS Division— UDS Division Sales and Distribution of Products.”
We utilize distributors for our
sales abroad, which subjects us to a number of risks that could harm our business.
We have developed
strategic relationships with a number of distributors for sales and service of our devices in certain foreign countries where
we are not directly represented by a subsidiary. If these relationships are terminated and not replaced, our revenues and/or ability
to market or service our devices in the related territories could be adversely affected. Our distributors’ actions may affect
our ability to effectively market our devices in certain foreign countries if, for example, a distributor holds the regulatory
authorizations in such countries and causes, by action or inaction, the suspension of such regulatory authorizations or sanctions
for non-compliance. It may be difficult, expensive, and time consuming for us to re-establish reputation, market access or regulatory
compliance in such case. Moreover, our distributors must be in compliance with anti-corruption laws, such as the U.S. Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act, and other local laws prohibiting corrupt payments to governmental officials or to customers and we may
not be able to trace or be kept informed of such corruption. In addition, we may be named as a defendant in lawsuits against our
distributors related to sales or service of our devices performed by these distributors. See our risk factor below: “We
face a significant risk of exposure to product liability claims in the event that the use of our products results in personal
injury or death.”
We operate in a highly regulated
industry and our future success depends on obtaining and maintaining government regulatory approval of our products, which we
may not receive or be able to maintain or which may be delayed for a significant period of time.
Government regulation
significantly impacts the development and marketing of our products, particularly in the United States, EU and Japan. We are regulated
in each of our major markets with respect to preclinical and clinical testing, manufacturing, labeling, distribution, sale, marketing,
advertising and promotion of our products. To market and sell products, we are required to obtain approval or clearance from the
relevant regulatory agencies, including the FDA with respect to the United States. The regulatory agencies may not act favorably
or quickly in their review of our submissions, or we may encounter significant difficulties in our efforts to obtain their clearance
or approval, or to maintain our existing approvals, all of which could delay or preclude the sale of new or existing products
in the related territories. In the European Union, the regulation of medical devices is being updated by the European Medical
Device Regulation (“MDR”) effective as of May 26, 2020, following the expiration of the three-year transition period,
imposing stricter requirements on the conformity assessment and the commercialization of our products. An MDR compliance action
plan is currently being performed in preparation of MDR enforcement within the expected timelines. We are implementing regulatory
actions to ensure our HIFU & ESWL devices may be distributed on the European and international market after May 2020.
The process of applying
for regulatory approval is often lengthy and requires the expenditure of substantial resources. Further, there can be no assurance
that we will receive the required approvals for our products from the required regulatory authorities or, if we do receive the
required approvals, that we will receive them on a timely basis, on the conditions and for the indications we seek, or that we
will otherwise be able to satisfy the conditions of such approval, if any.
Even if regulatory
approval to market a product is granted, it may include limitations on the indicated uses for which the product may be marketed.
Failure to comply with regulatory requirements can result in fines, suspension or withdrawal of regulatory approvals, product
recalls, seizure of products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecutions. Regulatory policy may change and additional government
regulations may be established that could prevent or delay regulatory approval of our products. Any delay, failure to receive
regulatory approval or the loss of previously received approvals could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. For more information on the regulation of our business, see Item 4, ‘‘Information
on the Company—Government Regulation’’ and “Information on the Company—HIFU Division—HIFU
Division Clinical and Regulatory Status.”
Moreover, we may
also be required to abandon previous strategies for regulatory approval, despite having made significant financial and time investments,
or refocus our efforts on alternative regulatory strategies, resulting in increased costs and efforts of management, without any
guarantee of success, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Furthermore, we
are also subject to healthcare laws and regulations pertaining to physician payment transparency, privacy and regulations. These
regulations include, but are not limited to (i) the U.S. federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”)
of 1996, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, which governs the conduct of certain
electronic healthcare transactions and protects the security and privacy of protected health information; (ii) the U.S. federal
Physician Payment Sunshine Act (the “Sunshine Act”), which requires manufacturers of medical devices for which payment
is available under Medicare, Medicaid, to report annually to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”)
information related to payments or other “transfers of value” made to physicians, (iii) two main sets of laws enacted
in France about transparency requirements: “The French Anti-Gift Law” which regulates the provision of gifts, discounts
and other incentives to physicians and the “Bertrand law” which imposes disclosure obligations on companies relating
to benefits and remunerations granted to, and agreements concluded with, physicians. Any failure to comply with these regulations
may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Finally, changes
to regulatory policies or the adoption of additional statutes or regulations that affect our business could impose substantial
additional costs or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our clinical trials related to
products using HIFU technology may not be successful and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approvals necessary for commercialization
of all of our HIFU products.
Before obtaining
regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of any of our devices under development, we must demonstrate through preclinical
testing and clinical trials that the device is safe and effective for use in each indication. Product development, including pre-clinical
studies and clinical trials is a long, expensive and uncertain process, and is subject to delays and failures at any stage. We
or the relevant regulatory authorities may suspend or terminate clinical trials at any time and regulating agencies may even refuse
to grant exemptions to pursue clinical trials. The results from preclinical testing and early clinical trials may not predict
the results that will be obtained in large-scale clinical trials. Companies can suffer significant setbacks in advanced clinical
trials, even after promising results in earlier trials. Furthermore, data obtained from a trial can be insufficient to demonstrate
that our products are safe, effective, and marketable. The commencement, continuation or completion of any of our clinical trials
may be delayed or halted, or inadequate to support approval of an application to regulatory authorities for numerous reasons including,
but not limited to:
|
·
|
that
regulatory authorities do not approve a clinical trial protocol or a clinical trial,
or place a clinical trial on hold, discussions with regulatory authorities to improve
our clinical protocols may prove difficult and lengthy; see Item 4, ‘‘Information
on the Company—HIFU Division Clinical and Regulatory Status.’’
|
|
·
|
slower
than expected rates of patient recruitment and enrolment;
|
|
·
|
inability
to adequately monitor patient during or after treatment;
|
|
·
|
failure
of patients to complete the clinical trial;
|
|
·
|
prevalence
and severity of adverse events and other unforeseen safety issues;
|
|
·
|
third-party
organizations not performing data collection and analysis in a timely and accurate manner;
|
|
·
|
governmental
and regulatory delays or changes in regulatory requirements, policies or guidelines;
|
|
·
|
the
interim or final results of a clinical trial are inconclusive or unfavorable as to safety
or efficacy; and
|
|
·
|
that
regulatory authorities conclude that our trial design is inadequate to demonstrate safety
and efficacy.
|
The data we collect
from our current clinical trials, our preclinical studies and other clinical trials may not be sufficient to support requested
regulatory approval. Additionally, certain regulatory authorities may disagree with our interpretation of the data from our preclinical
studies and clinical trials, or may find the clinical trial design, conduct or results inadequate to prove safety or efficacy,
and may require us to pursue additional preclinical studies or clinical trials, which would increase costs and could further delay
the approval of our products. If we are unable to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our products in our clinical trials,
we will be unable to obtain regulatory approval to market our products.
Our robotic HIFU
devices that have not received regulatory approval may not prove to be effective or safe in clinical trials or may not be approved
by the appropriate regulatory authorities. If our HIFU devices do not prove to be effective and safe in clinical trials to the
satisfaction of the relevant regulatory authorities, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially
adversely affected.
The commercial success of our
products depends on whether procedures performed by those products are eligible for reimbursement approved by national health
authorities and third-party payers.
Our success depends,
among other things, on the extent to which reimbursement can be obtained from healthcare payers for procedures performed with
our products. In the United States, we are dependent upon favorable decisions by CMS for Medicare reimbursement, individual managed
care organizations, private insurers and other payers. These decisions may be revised from time to time, which could negatively
affect reimbursement for procedures performed using our devices. In May 2017, CMS granted a C-code for the use of HIFU for prostate
tissue ablation, effective July 1st, 2017. This C-code covers hospital practical fees and remains temporary. In May
2019, the American Medical Association’s CPT Editorial Panel accepted our request to establish a new Category 1 CPT code
that will facilitate reimbursement for the ablation of malignant prostate tissue with HIFU. The CPT specific code description
selected by the panel is “Ablation of malignant prostate tissue, transrectal with high intensity focused ultrasound guidance.”
The establishment of a CPT code allows for reimbursement for both the technical fee as well as additional reimbursement to the
surgeon. We are currently in discussion with private insurers to advance on the reimbursement of HIFU procedures for prostate
tissue ablation. Outside the United States, and in particular in the European Union and Japan, third-party reimbursement is generally
conditioned upon decisions by national health authorities. In the European Union, there is no harmonized procedure for obtaining
reimbursement and, consequently, we must seek regulatory approval in each Member State. Procedures performed with our HIFU devices
are not reimbursed in the European Union with the exception of Italy, Germany, in the United Kingdom (where procedures are partially
reimbursed by either public healthcare systems or private insurers) and in France under certain conditions. In 2014, the French
healthcare government authorities announced the reimbursement of prostate cancer treatment procedures using HIFU as part of a
specific process (“Forfait Innovation”) to further validate breakthrough therapies and to accelerate their related
reimbursement process based on clinical trials and data registries. HIFU patients are still being treated and entered into the
dedicated registry. Under this specific process, French healthcare government authorities will review the clinical data gathered
following this decision in view of granting definitive reimbursement for HIFU. However, we cannot guarantee that a definitive
reimbursement code will finally be granted.
Lithotripsy procedures
currently are reimbursed by public healthcare systems in the European Union, in Japan and in the United States. However, a decision
in any of those countries to modify reimbursement policies for these procedures could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial conditions and results of operations. For example, in April 2016, the Japanese authorities decided to stop reimbursing
lithotripters’ disposables (electrodes) necessary to perform a lithotripsy procedure. This decision had and will have a
material effect on our current and future sales of lithotripsy disposables in Japan.
We cannot assure
investors that additional reimbursement approvals will be obtained in the near future. If reimbursement for our products is unavailable,
limited in scope or amount, or if pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels, and if we fail to establish or maintain a certain level
of reimbursement or full reimbursement from healthcare payers or governments and private healthcare payers’ policies change,
it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
HIFU technology may not be adopted
by the medical community and may never become a standard of care.
Our robotic HIFU
devices represent new therapies for the conditions that they are designed to treat. Notwithstanding any positive clinical results
that our HIFU devices may have achieved or may achieve in the future in terms of safety and efficacy and any marketing approvals
that we have obtained or may obtain in the future, there can be no assurance that such products will gain adoption by the medical
community. Physician adoption depends, among other things, on evidence of the cost effectiveness of a therapy as compared to existing
therapies and on adequate reimbursement from healthcare payers. Furthermore, acceptance by patients depends in part on physician
recommendations, as well as other factors, including the degree of invasiveness, the rate and severity of complications and other
side effects associated with the therapy as compared to other therapies.
If our robotic
HIFU devices do not achieve an adequate level of acceptance by physicians, patients, health care payers and the medical community
and never become a standard of care, we may not generate or maintain positive cash flows and we may not become profitable or be
able to sustain profitability. If we do achieve market acceptance of our products, we may not be able to sustain it or otherwise
achieve it to a degree, which would support the ongoing viability of our operations.
Our cash flow
is highly dependent on demand for our products.
Our cash flow has
historically been subject to significant fluctuations over the course of any given financial year due to cyclical demand for medical
devices, and the resulting annual and quarterly fluctuations in trade and other receivables and inventories. This has in the past
resulted in significant variations in working capital requirements and operating cash flows. Since we anticipate relying on cash
flow from operating activities to meet our liquidity requirements, a decrease in the demand for our products, or the inability
of our customers or distributors to meet their financial obligations to us, would reduce the funds available to us. In the future,
our liquidity may be constrained and our cash flows may be uncertain, negative or significantly different from period to period.
Our future cash flow will be affected by increased expenses in clinical trials, sales efforts as well as marketing campaigns and
promotional tools, particularly to implement our expanded U.S. and global strategy following the FDA clearance of Ablatherm, and
Focal One, while there is no assurance that this will result in an increase in the demand for our products and services. Our future
cash flow may also be affected by the decrease in revenues directly linked to delay and postponing of treatments and sales projects
due to COVID-19 crisis. It may also be affected by the increase in expenses linked to the management of the COVID-19 virus.
Competition in the markets in
which we operate is intense and is expected to increase in the future.
Competition in
the markets in which we operate is intense and is expected to increase in the future. In each of our main businesses, we face
competition both directly from other manufacturers of medical devices that apply the same technologies that we use, as well as
indirectly from existing or emerging therapies for the treatment of urological disorders.
In the markets that
we target for our robotic HIFU products, competition comes from new market entrants and alternative therapies, as well as from
current manufacturers of robotic medical devices. In the HIFU market, our devices, in particular the Ablatherm and the Focal One,
compete with all current treatments for localized tumors, including surgery, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy and cryotherapy.
Other energies addressing prostate cancer ablation are also currently being developed such as electroporation and microwave. Other
companies working with HIFU technology for the minimally invasive treatment of tumors include SonaCare Medical, a U.S. company
that markets a device called the Sonablate for the ablation of prostatic tissue. Sonablate was approved by the FDA for commercialization
in the U.S. in October 2015. Profound Medical, a Canadian company, is developing transurethral ultrasound therapy for prostate
cancer. Profound Medical acquired Philips Healthcare’s HIFU activity, integrating the development of HIFU devices addressing
uterine fibroids, breast tumors and drug delivery activated by HIFU. Insightec, an Israeli company owned mainly by General Electric,
Elbit Medical Imaging and Koch Industries, has developed a device using HIFU technology to treat uterine fibroids, painful bone
tumors and brain disorders. Theraclion, a French company licensed by EDAP to use of some of our HIFU patents, is currently marketing
the Echopulse HIFU device to treat thyroid tumors, benign breast tumors and varicose veins. Haifu, a Chinese company, is developing
HIFU products addressing various types of cancers. In addition, we believe that because ESWL has long been the standard treatment
for urinary tract calculus disease, competition in that market comes principally from current manufacturers of lithotripters,
including Wolf, Storz and Dornier. See Item 4, ‘‘Information on the Company—HIFU Division— HIFU Competition’’
and Item 4, ‘‘Information on the Company—UDS Division.’’
Many of our competitors
have significantly greater financial, technical, research, marketing, sales, distribution and other resources than we have and
may have more experience in developing, manufacturing, marketing and supporting new medical devices. In addition, our future success
will depend in large part on our ability to maintain a leading position in technological innovation, and we cannot assure investors
that we will be able to develop new products or enhance our current ones to compete successfully with new or existing technologies.
Rapid technological development by competitors may result in our products becoming obsolete before we recover a significant portion
of the research, development and commercialization expenses incurred with respect to those products.
We also face competition
for our maintenance and service contracts. Larger hospitals often utilize their in-house maintenance departments instead of contracting
with equipment manufacturers like us to maintain and repair their medical equipment. In addition, third-party medical equipment
maintenance companies increasingly compete with equipment manufacturers by offering broad repair and maintenance service contracts
to hospitals and clinics. This increased competition for medical devices and maintenance and service contracts could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our manufacturing operations are
highly regulated and failure to comply with those regulations would harm our business.
Our manufacturing
operations must comply with regulations established by regulatory agencies in the United States, the European Union and other
countries, and in particular with the Current Good Manufacturing Practices (‘‘CGMP’’) mandated by the
FDA and European Union standards for quality assurance and manufacturing process control. Since such standards may change, we
may not, at all times, comply with all applicable standards
and, as a result would be unable to manufacture our products for commercial sale. Our manufacturing facilities are subject to
inspection by regulatory authorities at any time. If any inspection by the regulatory authorities reveals deficiencies in manufacturing,
we could be required to take immediate remedial actions, suspend production or close the current and future production facilities,
which would disrupt our manufacturing processes. Accordingly, failure to comply with these regulations could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We depend on a single site to
manufacture our products, and any interruption of operations could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Most of our manufacturing currently takes
place in a single facility located in Vaulx-en-Velin, on the outskirts of Lyon, France. In the event of a significant interruption
in the operations of our sole facility for any reason, such as fire, flood or other natural disaster or pandemic diseases such
the COVID-19 virus necessitating quarantine implementation or a failure to obtain or maintain required regulatory approvals, we
would have no other means of manufacturing our products until we were able to restore the manufacturing capabilities at our facility
or develop alternative facilities, which could take considerable time and resources and have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations. Since mid-March 2019, we have taken the previously announced steps of
requiring the majority of our employees to work remotely, maintaining minimum supply chain activity and curtailing all business
travel. If we are unable to manufacture a sufficient or consistent supply of our products or products we are developing, or if
we cannot do so efficiently, our revenue, business and financial prospects would be adversely affected.
For certain components or services,
we depend on a single supplier who, due to events beyond our control may fail to deliver sufficient supplies to us or increase
the cost of items supplied, which would interrupt our production processes or negatively impact our results of operations.
We purchase the
majority of the components used in our products from a number of suppliers, but rely on a single supplier for some key components.
In addition, we rely on single suppliers for certain services. If the supply of these components or services were interrupted
for any reason, our manufacturing and marketing of the affected products would be delayed. These delays could be extensive, especially
in situations where a component substitution would require regulatory approval. In addition, such suppliers could decide unilaterally
to increase the price of supplied items and therefore cause additional charges for the Company. We expect to continue to depend
upon our suppliers for the foreseeable future. Failure to obtain adequate supplies of components or services in a timely manner
and at the agreed price could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may have
difficulties in attracting and recruiting highly qualified experts in software, design and development of high technology devices
such as our HIFU and ESWL products
Our devices require
highly qualified individuals as well as high-level of expertise and experience in design, software, mechanics and electronics.
We are highly dependent on our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel and engineers to develop our devices. In addition,
the learning curve required to master our systems is lengthy and, if we do not find qualified experts and engineers, we may not
be able to meet our development schedule and obtain market approval in due time, which in time may delay market introduction of
new products. Failure to recruit and attract experts in a timely manner may have a material adverse effect on our development,
business, financial condition and results of operations.
New device developments
and introductions may adversely impact our financial results.
From time to time,
we develop and introduce new devices with enhanced features and extended capabilities, targeting new clinical applications or
improving existing approaches. The success of new device introductions depends on a number of factors including, but not limited
to, timely and successful research and development, regulatory clearances or approvals, pricing, competition, market and consumer
acceptance, the manufacturing and supply costs, and the risk that new devices may have quality or other defects in the early stages
of introduction.
We invest in various
research and development projects to expand our product offerings. Our research and development efforts are critical to our success,
and our research and development projects may not be successful. We may be unable to develop and market new products successfully,
and the products we invest in and develop may not be well-received by customers or meet our expectations. Our research and development
investments may not generate significant operating income or contribute to our future operating results for several years, and
such contributions may not meet our expectations or even cover the costs of such investments.
If we fail to
effectively develop new products, obtain regulatory clearances or approval and manage new product introductions in the future,
our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows could be materially and adversely impacted.
Our gross profit margins may vary
overtime and could adversely impact our financial results.
Our gross profit
margins may be adversely impacted by various factors, including but not limited to: changes in product mix, in business models
(sales of devices, treatment procedures or leases), introduction of new devices which may generate lower margins than our existing
products, changes in manufacturing and labor costs, sale prices, market conditions.
If we fail to
actively reduce or mitigate the potential negative impact of the above factors our gross profit margins, our business, financial
condition, results of operations, or cash flows could be materially adversely affected.
Intellectual
property rights are essential to protect our medical devices, and any dispute with respect to these rights could be costly and
have an uncertain outcome.
Our success depends
in large part on our ability to develop proprietary products and technologies and to establish and protect the related intellectual
property rights, without infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties. The validity and scope of claims covered
in medical technology patents involve complex legal and factual questions and, therefore, the outcome of such claims may be highly
uncertain. The medical device industry has been characterized by extensive patents and other intellectual property rights litigation.
From time to time we may receive letters from third parties drawing our attention to their patent rights. Our products, including
our HIFU devices, may be subject to litigation involving claims of patent infringement or violation of other intellectual property
rights of third parties. The defense and prosecution of intellectual property suits, patent opposition proceedings and related
legal and administrative proceedings are both costly and time consuming and may result in a significant diversion of effort and
resources by our technical and management personnel. An adverse determination in any such litigation or proceeding to which we
become a party could subject us to significant liability to third parties, require us to seek licenses from third parties and
pay ongoing royalties, require us to redesign certain products or subject us to injunctions preventing the manufacture, use or
sale of the affected products. In addition to being costly, drawn-out litigation to defend or prosecute intellectual property
rights could cause our customers or potential customers to defer or limit their purchase or use of our products until the litigation
is resolved. See Item 4, ‘‘Information on the Company—HIFU Division—HIFU Division Patents and Intellectual
Property’’ and Item 4, ‘‘Information on the Company—UDS Division—UDS Division Patents and
Intellectual Property.’’
We own patents covering
several of our technologies and have additional patent applications pending in the United States, the European Union, Japan and
elsewhere. The process of seeking patent protection can be long and expensive and there can be no assurance that our patent applications
will result in the issuance of patents. We also cannot assure investors that our current or future patents are or will be sufficient
to provide meaningful protection or commercial advantage to us. Our patents or patent applications could be challenged, invalidated
or circumvented in the future. Failure to maintain or obtain necessary patents, licenses or other intellectual property rights
from third parties on acceptable terms or the invalidation or cancellation of material patents could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Litigation may be necessary to enforce patents issued to us or
to determine the enforceability, scope and validity of the proprietary rights of others. Our competitors, many of which have substantial
resources and have made substantial investments in competing technologies, may apply for and obtain patents that will interfere
with our ability to make, use or sell certain products, including our HIFU devices, either in the United States or in foreign
markets.
We also rely on
trade secrets and proprietary know-how, which we seek to protect through non-disclosure agreements with employees, consultants
and other parties. It is possible, however, that those non-disclosure agreements will be breached, that we will not have adequate
remedies for any such breach, or that our trade secrets will become known to, or independently developed by, competitors. Litigation
may be necessary to protect trade secrets or know-how owned by us. In addition, effective copyright and trade secret protection
may be unavailable or limited in certain countries.
The occurrence
of any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and result of operations.
We face a significant risk of
exposure to product liability claims in the event that the use of our products results in personal injury or death.
Our products are
designed to be used in the treatment of severe affections and conditions. Despite the use of our products, patients may suffer
personal injury or death, and we may, as a result, face significant product liability claims. We maintain separate product liability
insurance policies for the United States and Canada and for the other markets in which we sell our products. Product liability
insurance is expensive and there can be no assurance that it will continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms or
at all. In addition, our insurance may not cover certain product liability claims or our liability for any claims may exceed our
coverage limits. A product liability claim or series of claims brought against us with respect to uninsured liabilities or in
excess of our insurance coverage, or any claim or product recall that results in significant cost to or adverse publicity against
us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, if any of our products
prove to be defective, we may be required to recall or redesign the product which could result in costly corrective actions and
harm to our business reputation, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are exposed to risks related to cybersecurity threats
and incidents.
In the conduct of
our business, we collect, use, transmit and store data on information technology systems. This data includes confidential information
belonging to us, our customers and other business partners, as well as personally identifiable information of individuals. We
also store data related to our clinical trials on our information technology systems. We also rely in part on the reliability
of certain tested third parties' cybersecurity measures, including firewalls, virus solutions and backup solutions. Cybersecurity
incidents, such as breaches of data security, disruptions of information technology systems and cyber threats, may result in business
disruption, the misappropriation, corruption or loss of confidential information and critical data (ours or that of third parties),
reputational damage, litigation with third parties, diminution in the value of our investment in research and development, data
privacy issues and increased cybersecurity protection and remediation costs. Like many companies, we may experience certain of
these incidents given that the external cyber-attack threat continues to grow. Moreover, we devote significant resources to network
security, data encryption and other measures to protect our systems and data from unauthorized access or misuse, including meeting
certain information security standards that may be required by our customers, all of which increases cybersecurity protection
costs. We have not experienced any significant or material cybersecurity threats or incidents through the date of this annual
report. As these threats, and government and regulatory oversight of associated risks, continue to grow, we may be required to
expend additional resources to enhance or expand upon the security measures we currently maintain.
There can be no
assurance that our efforts or those of our third-party service providers to implement adequate security and control measures would
be sufficient to protect against breakdowns, service disruption, data deterioration or loss in the event of a system malfunction,
or prevent data from being stolen or corrupted in the event of a cyber-attack, security breach, industrial espionage attacks or
insider threat attacks which could result in financial, legal, business or reputational harm. Future cybersecurity breaches or
incidents or further increases in cybersecurity protection costs may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition or results of operations.
The expansion
of social media platforms and new technologies present risks and challenges for our business and reputation.
We
increasingly rely on social media and new technologies to communicate about our products and technologies. The use of these media
requires specific attention. Unauthorized communications, such as press releases or posts on social media, purported to be issued
by the Company, may contain information that is false or otherwise damaging and could have an adverse impact on our stock price.
Negative or inaccurate posts or comments about the Company, our business, directors or officers on any social networking website
could seriously damage our reputation. In addition, our employees and partners may use social media and mobile technologies inappropriately,
which may give rise to liability for the Company, or which could lead to breaches of data security, loss of trade secrets or other
intellectual property or public disclosure of sensitive information, including information about our employees, clinical trials
or customers. Such uses of social media, mobile technologies, or information technology more generally could have a material adverse
effect on our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our French and international operations
expose us to additional costs and legal and regulatory risks, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results
of operations and financial condition.
We have significant
French and international operations. We have direct distribution channels in over fifty countries outside of France, our country
of incorporation, and through our foreign subsidiaries. Compliance with complex foreign and French laws and regulations that apply
to our international operations increases our cost of doing business. These regulations include, among others, U.S. laws such
as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and other U.S. federal laws and regulations established by the Office of Foreign
Asset Control, laws such as the UK Bribery Act 2010 or other local laws, which prohibit corrupt payments to governmental officials
or certain payments or remunerations to customers. We have adopted a Code of Ethics that requires employees to comply with applicable
laws and regulations and particularly with Article 8 of law n°2016-1691 (known as Sapin II law). In accordance with Sapin
II law, we have implemented a whistle-blowing policy. These numerous and sometimes conflicting laws and regulations include, among
others, data privacy requirements, labor relations laws, tax laws, anti-competition regulations, “Know Your Customer”
requirements, import and trade restrictions, export requirements.
Given the high level
of complexity of these laws, there is a risk that we may inadvertently breach some provisions, for example, through fraudulent
or negligent behavior of individual employees, our failure to comply with certain formal documentation requirements, or otherwise.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to anticipate these risks and manage these challenges. We have a dispersed international
sales organization, and this structure makes it more difficult for us to ensure that our international selling operations comply
with our global policies and procedures.
Violations of these laws and regulations could result in fines, criminal sanctions against us, our officers or our employees,
requirements to obtain export licenses, cessation of business activities in sanctioned countries and prohibitions on the conduct
of our business. Violations of laws and regulations also could result in prohibitions on our ability to offer our products in
one or more countries and could materially damage our reputation, our brand, our international expansion efforts, our ability
to attract and retain employees, or our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In May 2018, the
new EU data protection framework, the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) took effect. The GDPR significantly
increases the level of data protection and imposes a greater compliance burden on companies. In particular, it now also treats
clinical data as personal data, requiring us or our subcontractors to implement more extensive procedures in the collection and
processing of clinical trial data. Furthermore, the GDPR significantly increases the level of sanctions for non-compliance. The
European Union data protection authorities have the power to impose administrative fines of up to a maximum of €20 million
or 4% of the Company’s consolidated revenues for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher. We believe that the
regulation did not have a material impact on our business or the way our technologies operate. However, due to the small size
of the Company, we may not be able to adequately document all data collection, to obtain related consents in due time, to adequately
protect private collected data or to react in due time to address an individual request linked to the GDPR application.
We sell our products in many parts
of the world and, as a result, our business is affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
We are exposed
to foreign currency exchange rate risk because the mix of currencies in which our costs are denominated is different from the
mix of currencies in which we earn our revenue. In 2019, approximately 74% of our total costs of sales and operating expenses
were denominated in euro, while approximately 51% of our sales were denominated in currencies other than euro (primarily the U.S.
dollar and the Japanese yen). Our operating profitability could be materially adversely affected by large fluctuations in the
rate of exchange between the euro and other currencies. For instance, a decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar or the Japanese
yen against the euro would have a negative effect on our revenues, which may not be offset by an equal reduction in operating
expenses and would therefore negatively impact operating profitability. From time to time we enter into foreign exchange forward
sale contracts to hedge against fluctuations in the exchange rates of the principal foreign currencies in which our receivables
are denominated (in particular, the U.S. dollar and the Japanese yen), but there can be no assurance that such hedging activities
will limit the effect of movements in exchange rates on our results of operations. As of December 31, 2019, we had no outstanding
hedging instruments. In addition, since any dividends that we may declare will be denominated in euro, exchange rate fluctuations
will affect the U.S. dollar equivalent of any dividends received by holders of ADSs. For more information concerning our exchange
rate exposure, see Item 11. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.”
Our results of operations have
fluctuated significantly from quarter to quarter in the past and may continue to do so in the future, as we experience long and
variable product sales cycles which are long and seasonal
Our results of operations
have fluctuated in the past and are expected to continue to fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter depending upon numerous
factors, including, but not limited to, the timing and results of clinical trials, changes in healthcare reimbursement policies,
cyclicality of demand for our products, changes in pricing policies by us or our competitors, new product announcements by us
or our competitors, customer order deferrals in anticipation of new or enhanced products offered by us or our competitors, product
quality problems and exchange rate fluctuations. Furthermore, because our main products have relatively high unit prices, the
amount and timing of individual orders can have a substantial effect on our results of operations in any given quarter.
The sales cycle
of our products is lengthy as our products are high value capital items for our customers that purchase generally requires the
approval of management or Boards of hospitals, purchasing groups and government authorities if applicable. In addition, some sales
are subject to public tender offer processes and approvals which could happen to be lengthy and as a result, hospitals may delay
their purchase orders according to their timelines and budget allocation. It is difficult to predict the exact timing for closing
product sales directly linked to the length of capital expenditure cycles. Historically, our sales of products have tended to
be stronger during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year.
Our results of operations and
financial condition could be adversely affected by the adverse economic, geo-political and financial developments.
The current geo-political,
economic and financial environment has affected the level of public and private spending in the healthcare
sector generally. A cautious or negative outlook may cause our customers to further delay or cancel investment in medical
equipment, which would adversely affect our revenues.
In addition, we
rely on the credit market to secure dedicated lease financings to fund the development of our Revenue-Per-Procedure (“RPP”)
business model related to the sale of treatments’ procedures. Due
to the limited availability of lending, we may be unable to access sufficient
lease financing. Without lease financing, we may be unable to continue the development of our RPP model or we may need
to fund such activity out of our existing working capital.
Similarly, some of our clients rely on lease financing to finance their purchases of equipment. Limited
availability of lease financing facilities may also
affect their purchasing decisions and may adversely impact our equipment sales.
The
United Kingdom (the “UK”) held a referendum in 2016 in which voters approved an exit from the European Union (the
“EU”), commonly referred to as “Brexit.” On March 29, 2017, the UK formally notified the EU of its intention
to withdraw pursuant to Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty. The EU and UK have negotiated a withdrawal agreement, which was ratified
by the British Parliament on January 9, 2020. The UK left the EU on January 31, 2020There will then be a transition period with
negotiations between UK and EU to determine future relationship between the UK and EU countries. It is possible that there will
be greater restrictions on imports and exports (i.e. custom duties) between the UK and EU countries, increased regulatory complexities
(in particular in terms of approval of devices), and economic and political uncertainty in the region. We sell devices and spare
parts in the UK and need to regularly maintain and service our installed base of equipment. Such restrictions on imports and exports
may have a significant impact on our business in the UK. This impact will depend on the trade negotiations and the length of the
transition period.
We have been and we may in the
future be the target of securities class action or other litigation, which could be costly and time consuming to defend.
In the past, securities
class action litigation has often been brought against companies following a decline in the market price of its securities. This
risk is especially relevant for us because innovative life sciences and medical device companies have experienced significant
stock price volatility in recent years.
Any litigation,
if instituted, could cause us to incur substantial costs and our management resources may be diverted to defending such litigation,
which could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.
We have identified a material
weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting and, if we fail to remediate adequately this material weakness and
achieve an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to report our financial results accurately. In addition,
the trading price of our securities may be adversely affected by a related negative market reaction.
As a publicly traded company, we are subject
to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We have incurred, and expect to continue
to incur, significant continuing costs, including accounting fees and staffing costs, to maintain compliance with the internal
control requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. As of December 31, 2019, as part of our internal control over financial
reporting and following the re-assessment of the material weakness reported in our Annual Report on 20-F for 2018 under item 15,
we have reviewed our remediation plan and found that although we have implemented certain new controls during 2019, some of these
controls were not considered as sufficiently robust. Also, part of the remediation plan was delayed due to IT staff shortage.
As such, we considered that the 2018 material weakness was not fully remediated. Based on this evaluation, management identified
a material weakness in our 2019 internal control over financial reporting with respect to this not fully executed 2018 remediation
plan. Execution was found deficient as it related to the implementation of IT program development changes and more specifically the
logging of change requests, the tracking of application change validations, the acceptance testing documentation and a lack of
segregation of duties upon IT changes implementation due to small size of our IT structure and organization.
Although we have
started additional remediation actions to close this material weakness, we may not be able, or our auditors may find that we have
not been able, to fully address the identified deficiencies and consistently execute on the Company’s internal controls
over financial reporting in a satisfactory manner.
Furthermore, the
ongoing requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may place a strain on our systems and resources. Our management is required to
evaluate the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of each year-end, and we are required to disclose
management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, including any material weakness
in our internal control over financial reporting.
Our internal control
over financial reporting has been designed to provide our management and Board of Directors with reasonable assurance regarding
the preparation and fair presentation of our consolidated financial statements. On an on-going basis, we are reviewing, documenting
and testing our internal control procedures. In order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures and internal control over financial reporting, and as our business develops, additional resources and management oversight
may be required.
Additional procedures were performed for year-end
2019 to demonstrate that no inappropriate use of our IT occurred as of December 31, 2019, and that this material weakness did
not result in a material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019 or restatement
of any prior period previously reported by the Company.
Any
failure to complete our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, to remediate any material weaknesses that
we have identified or may identify in the future, any failure to implement new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered
in their implementation, could harm our operating results, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations or result in material
misstatements in our financial statements. Any failure to maintain adequate internal controls over financial reporting and provide
accurate financial statements may subject us to litigation, render future financings more difficult or expensive, and could cause
the trading price of our common stock to decrease substantially. Inferior controls and procedures could cause investors to lose
confidence in our reported financial information, which may give rise to a class action and have a negative effect on the trading
price of our common stock. Any such failure could also adversely affect the results of the periodic management evaluations of
our internal controls and, in the case of a failure to remediate any material weaknesses that we have identified or may identify
in the future, would adversely affect the annual auditor attestation reports regarding the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting that are required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Risks Relating
to Ownership of Securities
Our
securities may be affected by volume fluctuations, and may fluctuate significantly in price, causing you to lose some or all of
your investment.
Our
ADSs are currently traded
on the NASDAQ Global Market. The average daily trading volume of our ADSs in 2019 was 177,251, the high and low bid price of our
ADSs for the last two financial years ended on December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, was $5.42 and $1.78, and $4.25 and $1.35,
respectively. Our ADSs have experienced, and are likely to experience in the future, significant price and volume fluctuations,
which could adversely affect the market price of our ADSs without regard to our operating performance. For example, average daily
trading volume of our ADSs in December 2018 was 90,875 as opposed to 120,648 for the same period of 2019. The price of our securities
and our ADSs in particular, may fluctuate as a result of a variety of factors, including changes in our business, operations and
prospects, and factors beyond our control, including regulatory considerations, results of clinical trials of our products or those
of our competitors, developments in patents and other proprietary rights, general market and economic conditions and results of
operations being below analysts’ or investors’ expectations. Any downward pressure on the price of ADSs caused
by the sale of ADS’s could also encourage short sales by third parties. In a short sale, a prospective seller borrows shares
from a shareholder or broker and sells the borrowed shares. The prospective seller hopes that the share price will decline, at
which time the seller can purchase shares at a lower price for delivery back to the lender. The seller profits when the share price
declines because it is purchasing shares at a price lower than the sale price of the borrowed shares. Such sales could place downward
pressure on the price of our ADSs by increasing the number of ADSs being sold, which could further contribute to any decline in
the market price of our ADSs.
These broad market
and industry factors may adversely affect the market price of our ADSs, regardless of our operating performance. If you invest
in our ADSs, you could lose some or all of your investment.
In addition, following
periods of volatility in the market price of a company's securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted.
Any additional litigation, if instituted, causes and could cause us to incur substantial costs and our management resources are
and could be diverted to defending such litigation, which could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.
We may issue
additional securities that may be dilutive to our existing shareholders.
On June 28, 2019,
our shareholders adopted resolutions allowing the Board of Directors to issue new shares in an aggregate maximum amount of 10
million shares in order to meet any fundraising opportunities that may be necessary to finance the Company’s development.
On June 28, 2019, our shareholders also adopted a resolution allowing the Board of Directors to issue 1 million new shares under
the form of subscription options to motivate and reward teams dedicated to successfully implementing our U.S. and worldwide expansion
plans. As of December 31, 2019, no additional shares were issued nor options allocated as authorized under this Plan.
The
issuance of additional ordinary shares, including any additional ordinary shares issuable pursuant to the exercise of preferential
subscription rights that may not be available to all of our shareholders, would reduce the proportionate ownership and voting
power of the then-existing shareholders.
We
are subject to different corporate disclosure standards that may limit the information available to holders of our ADSs.
As
a foreign private issuer, we are not required to comply with the notice and disclosure requirements under the Exchange Act relating
to the solicitation of proxies for shareholder meetings. Although we are subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the
Exchange Act, the periodic disclosure required of foreign private issuers under the Exchange Act is more limited than the periodic
disclosure required of U.S. issuers. Therefore, there may be less publicly available information about us than is regularly published
by or about other public companies in the United States.
We currently
do not intend to pay dividends, and cannot assure shareholders that we will make dividend payments in the future.
We
have never paid any dividend on our shares and do not anticipate paying any dividends for the foreseeable future. Thereafter,
declaration of dividends on our shares will depend upon, among other things, future earnings, if any, the operating and financial
condition of our business, our capital requirements, general business conditions and such other factors as our Board of Directors
deems relevant. See Item 8, “Financial Information—Dividends and Dividend Policy.”
Judgments
of U.S. courts, including those predicated on the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States,
may not be enforceable in French courts.
An
investor in the United States may find it difficult to:
|
•
|
effect
service of process upon or obtain jurisdiction over us or our non-U.S. resident directors and officers in the United States;
|
|
•
|
enforce
U.S. court judgments based upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us and our non-U.S.
resident directors and officers in France; or the United States; or
|
|
•
|
bring
an original action in a French court to enforce liabilities based upon the U.S. federal securities laws against us and
our non-U.S. resident directors and officers.
|
Holders
of ADSs have fewer rights than shareholders and must act through the Depositary to exercise those rights.
Holders
of ADSs do not have the same rights as shareholders and accordingly, cannot exercise rights of shareholders against us. The Bank
of New York Mellon, as Depositary (the “Depositary”), is the registered shareholder of the deposited shares underlying
the ADSs, and therefore holders of ADSs will generally have to exercise the rights attached to those shares through the Depositary.
We have used and will continue to use reasonable efforts to request that the Depositary notify the holders of ADSs of upcoming
votes and ask for voting instructions from them. If a holder fails to return a voting instruction card to the Depositary by the
date established by it for receipt of such voting instructions, or if the Depositary receives an improperly completed or blank
voting instruction card, or if the voting instructions included in the voting instruction card are illegible or unclear, then
such holder will be deemed to have instructed the Depositary to vote its shares and the Depositary shall vote such shares in favor
of any resolution proposed or approved by our Board of Directors and against any resolution not so proposed or approved.
Preferential
subscription rights may not be available for U.S. persons.
Under
French law, shareholders have preferential rights to subscribe for cash issuances of new shares or other securities giving rights
to acquire additional shares on a pro rata basis. U.S. holders of our securities may not be able to exercise preferential
subscription rights for their shares unless a registration statement under the Securities Act is effective with respect to such
rights or an exemption from the registration requirements imposed by the Securities Act is available. We may, from time to time,
issue new shares or other securities giving rights to acquire additional shares (such as warrants) at a time when no registration
statement is in effect and no Securities Act exemption is available. If so, U.S. holders of our securities will be unable to exercise
their preferential rights and their interests will be diluted. We are under no obligation to file any registration statement in
connection with any issuance of new shares or other securities.
For
holders of ADSs, the Depositary may make these rights or other distributions available to holders after we instruct it to do so
and provide it with evidence that it is legal to do so. If we fail to do this and the Depositary determines that it is impractical
to sell the rights, it may allow these rights to lapse. In that case, the holders of ADSs will receive no value for them.
Holders of our ADSs may be exposed
to increased transaction costs as a result of proposed European financial transaction taxes.
On February
14, 2013, the EU Commission adopted a proposal for a Council Directive (the "Draft Directive") on a common financial
transaction tax (the "FTT"). According to the Draft Directive, the FTT should have been implemented and should have
entered into effect in 10 EU Member States (Austria, Belgium, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Slovakia,
and Slovenia, each a “Participating Member State”). In March of 2016, Estonia indicated its withdrawal from enhanced
cooperation.
Pursuant to the
Draft Directive, the FTT was to be payable on financial transactions provided at least one party to the financial transaction
was established or deemed established in a Participating Member State and there was a financial institution established or deemed
established in a Participating Member State which was a party to the financial transaction, or was acting in the name of a party
to the transaction. Under the Draft Directive, the FTT should
not have applied, however, to (inter alia) primary market transactions referred to in Article 5(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1287/2006,
including the activity of underwriting and subsequent allocation of financial instruments in the framework of their issue.
The rates of the FTT were to be fixed by each Participating Member State but for transactions involving financial instruments
other than derivatives would have amounted to at least 0.1 per cent of the taxable amount. The taxable amount for such transactions
would have been generally determined by reference to the consideration paid or owed in return for the transfer. The
FTT would have been payable by each financial institution established or deemed established in a Participating Member State which
was either a party to the financial transaction, or acting in the name of a party to the transaction or where the transaction
had been carried out on its account. Where the FTT due had not been paid within the applicable time limits, each party to a financial
transaction, including persons other than financial institutions, would have become jointly and severally liable for the payment
of the FTT due.
The
Draft Directive has not been adopted. The FTT proposal is still subject to negotiation between the Participating Member States
and therefore may be changed at any time. In this respect, a new FTT proposal was submitted in December 2019. Under this new proposal,
the FTT would be imposed at a 0.2 per cent rate on the purchase of shares in domestically listed companies with a market capitalization
in excess of €1.0 billion, and would also apply to depositary receipts issued domestically and abroad and which are backed
by shares in these companies.
Moreover, once
a final agreement on such FTT proposal will be reached (the "FTT Directive"), it will need to be implemented into the
respective domestic laws of the Participating Member States and the domestic provisions implementing the FTT Directive might deviate
from the FTT Directive itself. See Item 10, "Additional Information - Certain Income Tax Considerations."
Prospective holders
should therefore note, in particular, that any sale, purchase, or exchange of the Shares or ADSs could become subject to the FTT
at a minimum rate of 0.1 per cent. The holder may be liable to itself pay this charge or reimburse a financial institution for
the charge, and / or may affect the value of the Shares or ADSs.
In
any case, prospective holders should consult their own advisers in relation to the consequences of the FTT associated with subscribing
for, purchasing, holding and disposing of ADSs.
Item 4. Information on the Company
We develop and
market robotic HIFU devices, advanced choices for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. HIFU treatment is shown to be a
minimally invasive and effective treatment option for localized prostate cancer (T1-T2) with a low occurrence of side effects.
Our HIFU devices are also used for patients who failed a radiotherapy treatment. In addition, we are developing a HIFU platform
for the treatment of various types of tumors including rectal endometriosis, liver and pancreatic cancer, but also breast and
gynecological tumors. We also produce and commercialize medical equipment for the treatment of urinary tract stones using ESWL
and distribute other types of urology devices in certain countries.
History and Development of the Company
Our legal name is
EDAP TMS S.A. and our commercial name is EDAP TMS. EDAP TMS S.A. was incorporated on December 3, 1979 as a société
anonyme organized under the laws of the Republic of France for a duration of 60 years from the date of incorporation. Our
principal executive offices are located at Parc d’Activités la Poudrette- Lamartine, 4/6, rue du Dauphiné,
69120 Vaulx-en-Velin, France and our telephone number is +33 (0) 4 72 15 31 50. Corporation Service Company, 251 Little Falls
Drive, Wilmington, DE19808-1674, United States, is our agent for service of process in the United States. The SEC maintains an
Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding the Company’s electronic
filings with the SEC. Such electronic filings can be found by visiting the SEC web site at http://www.sec.gov or the Company’s
web site at http://www.edap-tms.com, section “Investor Relations”.
On September 11,
2017, we submitted a (510K) application for our Focal One HIFU device in accordance with FDA guidance.
On June 7, 2018,
we obtained FDA clearance for our Focal One device dedicated to the focal ablation of prostate cancer. It incorporates our proprietary
fusion software, which merges MRI and ultrasound images, providing increased accuracy during planning and prostate treatment for
physicians. Focal approach in the treatment of localized prostate cancer reduces side effects and improves patients’ quality
of life.
In May 2019, the
American Medical Association’s (“AMA”) CPT Editorial Panel accepted our request to establish a new Category
1 CPT code that will facilitate reimbursement for the ablation of malignant prostate tissue with HIFU. The establishment of a
CPT code allows for reimbursement for both the technical fee as well as additional reimbursement to the surgeon. AMA’s decision
is expected in January 2021.
On October 30,
2019, we introduced a new concept of endourology multi-modality Platform Endo-UP designed for the management of urinary stones,
responding to the rapidly evolving urinary calculi paradigm. Endo-UP Platform is expected to be commercially available in 2020
in Europe, when CE mark is granted,
Additional information
regarding the principal capital expenditures and divestitures can be found in Item 5, ‘‘Operating and Financial Review
and Prospects’’.
Business Overview & Strategy
EDAP TMS S.A. is
a holding company and is responsible for providing common services to its subsidiaries, including preparation and consolidation
of the financial statements for the group, complying with the requirements of various regulatory agencies and maintaining the
listing of its publicly held securities and, in conjunction with its Board of Directors, directing the overall strategy of our
group.
Our activity is
organized in two divisions: HIFU and UDS (including lithotripsy activities). Through these two divisions, we develop, produce
and market minimally invasive medical devices, mainly for urological diseases. We believe that the creation of these two divisions
has allowed us to expand our market share by optimizing worldwide distribution capabilities, all of which is coordinated through
our subsidiaries.
Our HIFU and UDS
divisions operate in Europe, the Americas, Asia and the rest of the world. Total net sales for the HIFU division (in net contributions
to total consolidated sales) were €14.1 million, €11.0 million and €9.5 million for 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Those sales are generated in Europe, the United States and the rest of the world, excluding certain countries in Asia (including
Japan) where our HIFU devices are not approved yet. Total net sales for the UDS division were €30.8 million (including €17.5million
in Asia and €13.3 million in Europe and the rest of the world), €28.1 million (including €13.9 million in Asia
and €14.2 million in Europe and the rest of the world), and €26.2 million (including €13.4 million in Asia and
€12.8 million in Europe and the rest of the world), each for 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
See Note 28 to our
consolidated financial statements for a breakdown of total sales and revenue during the past three fiscal years by operating division
and Item 5, “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”
HIFU Division
The HIFU division
is engaged in the development, manufacturing and marketing of medical devices based on HIFU technology for the minimally invasive
treatment of urological and other clinical indications. Our HIFU business is cyclical and generally linked to lengthy hospital
decision and investment processes. Hence, our quarterly revenues are often impacted and fluctuate according to these parameters,
possibly resulting in a higher purchasing activity in the last quarter of the year. The HIFU division contributed
€14.1 million to our consolidated net sales during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.
HIFU Division Business Overview
The HIFU division
currently develops, manufactures and markets robotic devices for the minimally invasive ablation of certain types of localized
tumors using HIFU technology. HIFU technology uses a high-intensity convergent ultrasound beam generated by high power transducers
to produce heat. HIFU technology is intended to allow the surgeon to destroy a well-defined area of diseased tissue without damaging
surrounding tissue and organs, thereby eliminating the need for incisions, transfusions and general anesthesia and associated
complications. The HIFU division markets three HIFU devices: the Ablatherm, the Ablatherm Fusion and the Focal One. The Ablatherm
and Ablatherm Fusion are dedicated to the treatment of organ-confined prostate cancer, referred to as T1-T2 stage. The Focal One
high-end device is a HIFU fully robotic device dedicated to the focal therapy of localized prostate cancer of T1-T2 stage, thereby
destroying targeted cancer cells only. The robotic features of our HIFU devices make the treatment procedure much safer for the
patient and less operator dependent. All three devices can be used for patients who are not candidates for surgery or who have
failed a radiotherapy treatment.
In addition to selling
HIFU devices, the HIFU division also records revenues driven from HIFU treatments performance (“HIFU Treatment Driven Revenues”)
which include net sales of (i) disposables, (ii) leases (iii) revenue-per-procedure (“RPP”) and (iv) treatment related
services. The HIFU mobile treatment option provides access to our HIFU devices without requiring hospitals and clinics to make
an up-front investment in the equipment. Instead, hospitals and clinics perform treatments using these devices and remunerate
us on a RPP basis (i.e., on the basis of the number of individual treatments provided). With this model, once the treatment is
established in the medical community, a permanent installation may become more attractive, leading to the sale of the device in
some of the larger locations.
In addition, the
HIFU division also generates revenues from net sales of maintenance services associated to our HIFU devices installed base. As
of December 31, 2019, the HIFU division had an installed base of 153 HIFU devices of which 44 Focal One machines.
HIFU Division Business Strategy
The HIFU division’s
business strategy is to capitalize on its expertise in HIFU and its position in urology to achieve long-term growth as a leader
in the development, manufacturing, marketing and distribution of minimally invasive medical devices for urological and other indications,
using HIFU technology, while preserving patient quality of life. The HIFU division believes that minimally invasive treatments
using HIFU could provide an alternative to current invasive therapies on the basis of reduced cost and reduced morbidity for a
number of different indications. The key elements of the HIFU division’s strategy to achieve that objective are:
|
·
|
Provide
Minimally Invasive Solutions to Treat Localized Prostate Cancer using HIFU. Building
upon our established position in the ESWL market, our HIFU division is striving to become
the leading provider of our minimally invasive HIFU treatment option for prostate cancer.
We believe that there is a large market opportunity with an increase in incidence linked
to the aging male population, an increase in screening and recent campaigns to increase
awareness about prostate cancer. We also believe that HIFU could represent a credible
alternative to surgery, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy and cryotherapy for
the treatment of organ-confined prostate cancer without the cost, in-patient hospitalization
and adverse side effects associated with those therapies. With the growing demand for
more focused treatments destroying the tumor only (focal therapy) while continuously
controlling the disease, HIFU and its focused approach, is well positioned to address
this new clinical approach. The HIFU division intends to achieve this through a direct
sales network in key European countries and the United States and through selected distributors
in other European countries and in Asia. The HIFU division has built a strong clinical
credibility based on clinical articles published in peer-reviewed journals. We ensure
effective patient and physician education through a focused communication program.
|
|
·
|
Achieve
Long-Term Growth by Expanding HIFU Applications Beyond Prostate Cancer. The HIFU
division’s long-term growth strategy is to apply our HIFU technology toward the
treatment of other medical
conditions beyond prostate cancer. We believe that HIFU could represent an alternative
to surgery and radiotherapy for the treatment of many tumors without the cost, in-patient
hospitalization and adverse side effects associated with those therapies. The HIFU division
is working on various other applications such as rectal endometriosis, liver, pancreatic
cancers, breast and gynecological tumors where HIFU could provide an alternative to current
therapies. In 2019, the HIFU division maintained gross expenses at
levels similar to 2018 on research and development (“R&D”) projects
to develop HIFU applications beyond prostate cancer. The division is considering increasing
levels of R&D spending in 2020 and future years to strengthen its technological leadership
in HIFU and expand its application beyond urology.
|
HIFU Products
Currently, we commercialize
three products utilizing the HIFU technology. Cell destruction by HIFU is accomplished by a combination of thermal and cavitation
effects caused by focused application of piezoelectric-generated high-intensity ultrasound; HIFU procedures are performed under
general or spinal anesthesia.
|
·
|
The Ablatherm is an ultrasound guided robotic HIFU device for the treatment of organ-confined prostate cancer. It consists
of a treatment module, including a HIFU endorectal probe, a control table with a computer and a computer screen, and a diagnostic
ultrasound device connected to the treatment module. After insertion of an endorectal probe, the physician visualizes the
prostate using ultrasound imaging and defines the area to be treated. The computer automatically calculates the optimum treatment
distribution of lesions. During the treatment, the probe automatically moves and fires HIFU beams at each predefined lesion
until the entire targeted area has been treated. At the same time, the physician is able to control and visualize the treatment
in real time due to the integrated imaging system.
|
|
·
|
Ablatherm Fusion is an evolution of Ablatherm, and incorporates the Company’s proprietary fusion software which merges
MRI and ultrasound images providing physicians with increased accuracy during planning and treatment.
|
|
·
|
The
Focal One is a HIFU fully robotic device dedicated to the focal therapy of prostate cancer.
Focal One combines the three essential components to efficiently perform a focal treatment
of localized prostate cancer: (i) high-quality imaging to localize tumors with the use
of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with real-time ultrasound, (ii) high precision
of HIFU treatment focused on identified targeted cancer areas and (iii) immediate feedback
on treatment efficacy utilizing Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging. Focal One provides
an effective and accurate ablative treatment of localized tumors with the capacities
of being flexible and repeatable, while preserving patient quality of life.
|
HIFU
Division Patents and Intellectual Property
As of December 31,
2019, the HIFU division’s patent portfolio contained 40 patents consisting of 12 granted patents in the United States, 22
patents in the European Union and Japan and 6 patents in both Israel and the rest of the world. They belong to 16 groups of patents
covering key technologies related to therapeutic ultrasound principles, systems and associated software.
During 2019, one
patent, covering ultrasound imaging of HIFU lesions within the liver has been granted in the United States. Two additional patents
were granted in France. One covers a specific transducer cooling process adapted to high ultrasound energy emission and the other
one concerns the design of a detachable probe part, used to easily fix disposable coupling covers or engineering tools servicing
the probe.
Nine additional
patents covering certain other aspects of our HIFU technology in the European Union and Japan (five), the United States (two),
and the rest of the world (two) are currently under review. Our ongoing research and development objectives are to maintain our
leadership position in the treatment of prostate cancer and to extend the HIFU technology to new applications and minimally invasive
systems. These research projects are conducted in cooperation with the French National Institute for Health and Medical Research
(“INSERM”) which give rise in some cases to the filing of patents, followed by the grant of co-owned patents. We have
entered into various license agreements with INSERM whereby we commit to pay a fixed amount of royalties to INSERM based on the
net revenues generated from the sales of HIFU devices using co-owned patents. Under these agreements, which last for the life
of each co-owned patent, we have the exclusive right to the commercial use of the co-owned patents, including the right to out-license
such commercial rights.
In August 2004,
we licensed our HIFU technology for the specific treatment of the ‘‘cervicofacial’’ lesions, including
the thyroid, to Theraclion, a French company created by our former director of research and development. On January 11, 2011,
we extended the above license by granting Theraclion exclusivity for the treatment of benign breast tumors and by granting a non-exclusive
license for the treatment of malignant breast tumors. This license agreement provides for the payment of certain royalties calculated
on the basis of Theraclion’s sales of devices. We determined that we could not invest in these specific applications at
that time and this license agreement therefore allows Theraclion to pursue the development of HIFU for these applications. We
own no interest in Theraclion.
Although we believe
that our HIFU patents are valid and should be enforceable against third parties and that our patent applications should, if successfully
pursued, result in the issuance of additional enforceable patents, there can be no assurance that any or all of these patents
or patent applications will provide effective protection for the HIFU division’s proprietary rights in such technology.
HIFU devices, as they are currently or may in the future be designed, may also be subject to claims of infringement of patents
owned by third parties, which could result in an adverse effect on our ability to market HIFU systems. See Item 3, “Risk
Factors – Risks relating to Intellectual Property Rights.”
HIFU Division
Clinical and Regulatory Status
Clinical and
Regulatory Status in Europe
Ablatherm devices
previously placed on the market are maintained for use according to applicable regulation and any new placement of HIFU devices,
in Europe or in territory covered by CE Marking, is being addressed with a Focal One new generation device. Based on clinical
study results, we obtained a CE Marking for Focal One in June 2013, which allowed us to market the Focal One in the European Union
and in worldwide territories where CE Marking is required. Our current notified body has recently expanded our Focal One CE certificate
until May 2024.
Clinical and
Regulatory Status in the United States
In 2005, EDAP started
an Investigational Device Exemption (“IDE”) study (G050103) to assess the safety and effectiveness of Ablatherm HIFU
in the U.S. for the treatment of low risk, localized prostate cancer. This study was designed as a pivotal study to support PMA
approval. This study was planned as a multicentric, prospective, non-randomized, concurrently controlled clinical trial comparing
Ablatherm HIFU to cryotherapy in patients with low risk, localized prostate cancer. Due to accrual difficulties, particularly
in the cryosurgery arm, this planned study was not completed. Of the planned 205 patients per arm, 136 and five patients were
recruited to the Ablatherm HIFU and cryosurgery arms, respectively. We completed the treatment of 134 patients in June 2010, the
required two years’ follow-up phase was completed in June 2012. Clinical outcomes from these patients combined with our
strong European long-term database formed the foundation of our PMA submission to the FDA on January 31, 2013.
On March 9, 2015,
we announced that based on our collaborative discussions with the FDA, we planned to seek clearance of Ablatherm HIFU by way of
a direct de novo 510(k) application as opposed to the PMA application amendment we had been considering. The FDA indicated that
while PMA approval would be required for specific claims regarding treatment of prostate cancer, a prostate tissue ablation claim
could be cleared via a direct de novo 510(k) application.
In November 2015,
we received 510(k) clearance from the FDA to market Ablatherm® Integrated Imaging HIFU in the U.S. for the ablation
of prostate tissue and in October 2017, we were granted a 510(k) clearance for our Ablatherm Fusion device.
On June 7, 2018,
based on Ablatherm clearance and European pre-market and post-market clinical data, we obtained FDA 510(k) clearance for our Focal
One device.
Clinical and
Regulatory Status in Japan
We have initiated discussions with the Japanese
authorities (“PMDA”) on the best process to apply to obtain Japanese approval for our Focal One device. We will need
to conduct a clinical trial in Japan to obtain clearance for our HIFU Focal One device. The process of requesting approval to
market the Focal One in Japan may be long and may never result in the approval to market the Focal One in Japan. See Item 3, ‘‘Risk
Factors—Our future revenue growth and income depend, among other things, on the success of our HIFU technology—
and — Our clinical trials related to products using HIFU technology may not be successful and we may not be able to obtain
regulatory approvals necessary for commercialization of all of our HIFU products.”
Clinical and
Regulatory Status in China
We did not obtain marketing clearance of our HIFU devices by Chinese
authorities due to lengthy and complex processes. We are currently reviewing our regulatory strategy to address the China market.
Clinical and
Regulatory Status in the Rest of the World
The Ablatherm
is cleared for distribution in Canada, Costa Rica, Peru, Russia, Taiwan, Australia, Brazil, South Korea and Ecuador.
The Focal One
device is cleared for distribution in Saudi Arabia, Argentina, Brazil, Canada, South Korea, Costa Rica, United Arab Emirates,
Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, Russia, Singapore, Ukraine and Venezuela.
See Item 3, “Risk
Factors” – “We operate in a highly regulated industry and our future success depends on government regulatory
approval of our products, which we may not receive or which may be delayed for a significant period of time.”
HIFU Clinical
Developments
HIFU in Prostate
Cancer
The clinical study initiated in 2015 within the scope of “Forfait
Innovation” (the “HIFI” study) and piloted by the French Association of Urology (“AFU”) aimed at
evaluating the reimbursement of HIFU in France. The patients’ inclusion period closed on September 30, 2019. Patients included
in the HIFI study will be followed for 30 months ahead of data analysis and results publication. During that follow-up period,
we will be able to pursue patient treatments using HIFU under the specific Forfait Innovation coverage process, but these patients
will not be followed as part of HIFI Study.
In July 2017, we,
together with our academic, scientific and clinical partners, initiated a collaborative project (the “PERFUSE” project)
under the “French National Investment Program for the Future”. The overall objective of the PERFUSE project is two-fold:
(i) to set-up several clinical studies to assess focal therapy using the Focal One device in view of a better understanding of
focal therapy in prostate cancer management and, (ii) to prepare a change of paradigm in the treatment of prostate cancer via
technical innovations such as focal therapy. The whole project was awarded funding of €8 million over five years. We, as
a partner of the PERFUSE project, are to receive €1.2 million over the period as a non-refundable grant.
As part of PERFUSE
project, several studies have already been initiated and sponsored by academic partner Edouard Herriot Hospital. In September
2018, we launched a phase 2 multicentric study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HIFU focal therapy in patients with intermediate-risk
single-lobed prostate cancer (the “FOCAL” study). 170 patients are to be included in the FOCAL study. In October 2018,
we initiated a phase 3, multicentric, randomized study aiming at evaluating the efficacy of focal HIFU versus active surveillance
hence reducing the need for radical treatment for low-risk prostate cancer patients (the “HIFUSA” study). 146 patients
are to be included in the study. In February 2020, French regulatory authorities authorized the initiation of a phase 1 study
aiming at evaluating the use of HIFU guided by a new imaging modality (“PSMA-PET-MRI”) to evaluate prostate cancer
recurrence after radiotherapy (the “PMSA” study). 40 patients are to be included in the study.
In early 2018, a
new database, called the Focal Robotic Ultrasound Ablation Registry (“FoR-UsA”), has been established to initially
collect high quality clinical data of U.S. patients treated with Ablatherm Robotic HIFU. Clinical data from Focal One treatments
is now being added to the Registry. The FoR-UsA Registry is the first in the U.S. that specifically collects data on patients
who have had HIFU focal therapy for prostate tissue ablation, giving urologists around the U.S. greater access to short and long-term
HIFU outcomes. The registry also holds the potential for the FDA, which cleared HIFU for prostate tissue ablation in 2015, to
re-evaluate the technology in the future for a prostate cancer indication. Likewise, health insurance reimbursements on a wider
scale are also possible with a registry documenting HIFU data from patients in the U.S.
HIFU in Liver
Cancer
In June 2015, we entered into a multi-partner liver cancer development
project organized by the HECAM consortium. This project aims at developing innovative diagnostic, imaging and therapeutic technologies
to address liver cancer. Our focus within the HECAM consortium is on developing a novel HIFU treatment for liver cancer. To fund
this development program, EDAP is to receive a maximum of €2.4 million in non-dilutive financing from Bpifrance over the five-year
project period. We received the first instalment of €0.7 million in June 2015 and a second installment of €0.8 million
in June 2017 (i.e. a total of €1.5 million including €1.0 million as a conditional subsidy and €0.5 million as a
grant). The HECAM project is currently being finalized and a multicentric phase II study will be initiated based on a first mono-centric
study successfully implemented with Lyon’s Centre Leon Bérard cancer center.
HIFU in Deep Endometriosis
In 2020, we plan
to initiate a multicentric study to investigate further the use of Focal One HIFU in the treatment of certain types of deep endometriosis
situated in the low rectum. This study will complement a phase I study successfully finalized in 2019 which reported promising
results with a significant improvement of the outcomes and in patient quality of life at six months.
HIFU Clinical
Publications
To date, clinical
results related to our HIFU devices have been published in renowned peer-reviewed journals.
In October 2016,
clinical results were published in the European Urology journal (Rischmann et al.). They validated a new focal HIFU strategy
in the treatment of prostate cancer localized in a single lobe of the prostate (hemi-ablation treatment). The goal of focal treatment
as opposed to “radical” treatment is to reduce the complications associated with standard treatments, particularly
the risks of incontinence and impotence.
In December 2016,
Professor Roland van Velthoven from Institut Bordet Oncology Center, Brussels, Belgium published in the Journal of Endourology
a matched pair analysis of HIFU Hemi-ablation vs robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. In this study, 55 patients with
prostate cancer localized in a single lobe of the prostate were treated using Ablatherm-HIFU and their outcomes were compared
1:1 with patients having similar clinical criteria but who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
In 2017, Crouzet
et al. from Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France, reported in the British Journal of Urology (BJU), oncological outcomes
of salvage HIFU for locally recurrent prostate cancer after External Beam Radiotherapy (“EBRT”). This retrospective
study comprises patients from nine centers with local recurrent cancer after EBRT treated with HIFU from 1995 to 2009. The publication
is the largest series of salvage treatment confirming very positive oncological outcomes.
More recently,
Ganzer & al., Germany, evaluated focal HIFU Hemi-ablation in a prospective trial. Their data were published in the Journal
of Urology in April 2018. In their conclusion, they reported that focal therapy Hemi-ablation is safe with acceptable oncologic
outcome.
In November 2019,
Philip CA et al, from Croix Rousse Hospital, Lyon, France, published in Ultrasound Obstet Gynecology journal, the results
of the treatment of 20 patients with deep rectal endometriosis using Focal One HIFU. This study is the first one on the use of
HIFU in this indication. The authors reported very promising results with low morbidity and significant efficiency on intestinal
and gynecological symptoms as well as in the quality of life.
In September 2019,
Dupré et al. from Leon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France, published in the Journal of Visualized Experiments
an evaluation of the feasibility, safety and accuracy of an Intraoperative HIFU device for treating liver metastases. Results
are promising and a multicentric phase II study is to be initiated.
In February 2020,
Tourhino-Barbosa et al. from Institut Mutualiste Monsouris, Paris, France, published in the Journal of Urology a retrospective
study presenting their results of focal prostate cancer treatments (HIFU and cryotherapy) in their institution.
HIFU Division Market Potential
Prostate cancer
is currently the first or second most common form of cancer among men in many populations. In the United States, the American
Cancer Society estimates the number of new prostate cancers diagnosed for 2020 to be approximately 191,930, of which approximately
70% are diagnosed with localized stage prostate cancer. Additionally, the HIFU division believes, based on figures provided by
the World Health Organization that the worldwide incidence of localized prostate cancer is approximately twice this U.S. figure.
A more effective diagnostic method for prostate cancer, the PSA test, has increased public awareness of the disease in developed
countries since its introduction. PSA levels jump sharply when cancer is present. Prostate cancer is an age-related disease, and
its incidence in developed countries is expected to increase as the population ages.
Management believes
that HIFU therapy could be expanded to other medical conditions,
such as rectal endometriosis, liver, certain localized thyroid, breast, gynecological, bladder, kidney, brain, pancreatic and
retroperitoneal tumors. We decided to focus on developing HIFU for certain types of pathologies.
For example, in
2019 we successfully finalized a clinical phase 1 study using Focal One HIFU to address certain types of deep endometriosis located
in the low rectum. The study results are promising and show a decrease of symptoms in the treated patients. A multi-centric study
is to be initiated in 2020 to investigate further the use of HIFU in this pathology. As per the European Society of Human Reproduction
and Embryology, endometriosis is estimated to affect approximately one in 10 women of reproductive age.
In view of addressing
liver cancer using HIFU technology, we entered into a multi-partner liver cancer development project named the HECAM consortium
in 2015 to develop a novel HIFU approach to treat liver metastasis. The HECAM project is being finalized and a multicentric study
is to be initiated based on a first mono-centric study implemented with Lyon’s Centre Leon Bérard cancer center.
We also anticipate
to develop HIFU technology to address pancreatic, breast and gynecological tumors. However, the expansion of the use of HIFU to
other areas of treatment will require a significant investment in research and development, an investment we will undertake gradually
while focusing on the acceptance of HIFU as a treatment for localized prostate cancer.
HIFU Competition
The principal
current therapies for prostate cancer carry side effects that can seriously affect a patient’s quality of life. One of the
current therapies is radical prostatectomy (surgery), which involves the ablation of the entire prostate gland. Radical prostatectomy
requires several days of hospital stay and several weeks of recovery, usually with catheterization, and may result in partial
and/or total urinary incontinence. In addition, it almost invariably renders patients impotent. A new surgical technique, nerve-sparing
prostatectomy, has been developed to address that problem. However, the procedure can only be applied when the tumor is not located
close to the surface of the prostate and it requires a very skilled surgeon. Other therapies for localized prostate cancer include
brachytherapy, a therapy that involves the implantation of radioisotopes into the prostate gland, EBRT and cryotherapy.
Our robotic HIFU
devices compete with all current treatments for localized tumors, which include surgery, brachytherapy, radiotherapy, cryotherapy
and electroporation. We believe that HIFU competes against those treatments on the basis of efficacy, limited side effects and
cost-effectiveness.
We also believe
that Focal One will be well positioned to address the growing demand for a “focal” approach of localized prostate
cancer which cannot be answered by surgery or radiation therapy. “Focal” treatment (also known as “partial”
or “zonal” treatment, as opposed to “radical” treatment) provides an effective and accurate ablative treatment
of localized tumors with the capacities of being flexible and repeatable, while preserving patient quality of life.
Other companies
are working with HIFU for the minimally invasive treatment of tumors. See Item 3, “Risk Factors – Competition in
the markets in which we operate is intense and is expected to increase in the future.”
Certain existing
and potential competitors of our HIFU division may have substantially greater financial, research and development, sales and marketing
and personnel resources than us and may have more experience in developing, manufacturing, marketing and supporting new products.
We believe that an important factor in the potential future market for HIFU treatments will be the ability to make the substantial
investments in research and development required to advance the technology beyond the treatment of prostate cancer. These future
investments are wholly dependent on the successful acceptance of the device for the treatment of prostate cancer.
HIFU Division Sales and Distribution
of Products
The HIFU division
markets and sells its products through our own direct marketing and sales organization as well as through selected third-party
distributors and agents in several countries. Using our direct subsidiaries or representative offices network, the HIFU division
maintains direct marketing and sales forces in France, the United States, Germany, Russia and Italy, which currently represent
its largest HIFU markets. Additionally, the HIFU division markets and sells its products through our distribution platform in
the Middle East, South Korea and South East Asia.
The HIFU division’s
customers are located worldwide and have historically been principally public and private hospitals and urology clinics. The HIFU
division believes that as it increases its customer base it will gain further access to the medical community, which will enable
it to monitor the urological market as well as other new targeted markets, introduce new products and conduct trials addressing
new pathologies under satisfactory conditions. No single customer of the HIFU division represents a significant portion of the
division’s installed base.
The HIFU division’s
marketing efforts currently include the organization of information and training programs for urologists, mainly in key European
countries and in the United States where HIFU awareness is growing, comprehensive media and web programs to educate patients on
the availability of HIFU technology to treat localized prostate cancer and strong participation in focused dedicated urological
events. Our dedicated web site www.hifu-prostate.com for patients and physicians is visited regularly. The information contained
on that website is not incorporated by reference herein.
The HIFU division
is also committed to exclusively distribute HIFU products on behalf of Theraclion, in France, including the Echopulse device dedicated
to the treatment of benign breast tumors and thyroid tumors.
UDS Division
The UDS division
is engaged in the development, marketing, manufacturing and servicing of medical devices for the minimally invasive diagnosis
or treatment of urological disorders, mainly urinary stones, and other clinical indications. The UDS division contributed
€30.8 million to our consolidated net sales during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.
Our UDS business
is quite cyclical and generally linked to lengthy hospital decision and investment processes and their activities. Hence our quarterly
revenues are often impacted and fluctuate according to these parameters, generally resulting in a possible higher selling activity
in the last quarter of the year.
UDS Division Business Overview
The UDS division’s
primary business is producing and marketing devices, known as lithotripters, for the treatment of urinary tract stones by means
of ESWL technology. ESWL uses extracorporeal shockwaves, which can be focused at urinary stones within the human body to fragment
the stones, thereby permitting their natural elimination and preventing the need for incisions, transfusions, general anesthesia,
and the resulting complications. The UDS division currently markets two models of lithotripters: the Sonolith i-move and the Sonolith
i-sys high-end model. The Company will stop manufacturing the Sonolith i-sys in 2020 as the UDS division recently introduced a
new high-end endourology platform Endo-UP® designed for the complete stone management; Endo-UP platform is to be
commercially available in 2020. As of December 31, 2019, the UDS division has an actively maintained
or otherwise serviced installed base of 753 lithotripters.
In addition to its
manufacturing and selling of lithotripters, the UDS division also generates revenues from the leasing of lithotripters, as well
as from the sale of disposables, spare parts and maintenance services. It also derives revenues from the distribution of urodynamics
products and urology lasers.
UDS Division Business Strategy
The business strategy
for the UDS division is to capitalize on its expertise in ESWL and its position in urology to achieve long-term growth as a leader
in the development, production, marketing and distribution of minimally invasive medical devices for urological and other clinical
indications. The UDS division manufactures its own products as part of EDAP TMS France SAS (“EDAP TMS France”), our
wholly owned subsidiary. The key elements of the UDS division’s strategy are:
|
·
|
Capitalize
on the Current ESWL Installed Base. The UDS division’s long-term growth strategy
relies on its ability to capitalize on its extensive installed base of ESWL lithotripters
to recognize ongoing revenue from sales of disposables, accessories, services and replacement
machines. We believe that offering highly innovative units that are easily adaptable
to various treatment environments, as well as a commitment to quality and service will
allow the UDS division to achieve this goal. See ‘‘Information on the Company—UDS
Division Products’’.
|
|
·
|
Capitalize
on an Established Distribution Platform in Urology by Expanding Distribution Possibilities.
We believe that we can achieve additional long-term growth by offering our established
distribution platform in urology to other developers of medical technologies and acting
as a distributor for their devices. Our distribution platform in urology consists of
a series of well-established subsidiaries in Europe, the United States, the Middle East
and Asia as well as a network of third-party distributors worldwide.
|
|
·
|
Provide
Manufacturing Solutions to Other Developers of Medical Technologies. Building upon
its established position in the high-tech medical devices market, we believe that the
UDS division can become a provider of manufacturing alternatives to other developers
of medical technologies that do not have or do not wish to invest in their own manufacturing
facilities. We believe that our FDA-inspected and ISO 13485: 2016 certified facilities
allow us to offer manufacturing services to a wide range of potential medical equipment
developers.
|
UDS Division Products
The UDS division
currently offers the Sonolith i-move extracorporeal shockwave lithotripter to small and mid-size hospitals, and will offer the
Endo-UP platform, when cleared and commercially available, to various sized hospitals and clinical sites as a complete stone management
platform. The UDS division also sells disposable parts for lithotripters, including the piezoelectric elements of the LT02, (a
machine we discontinued manufacturing in 2002) and the electrodes of the Sonolith line, which need to be replaced approximately
every ten treatments. These parts incorporate key proprietary technologies, and the UDS division has retained sole marketing rights
for these parts.
The Sonolith i-move
and the shockwave generator integrated in the Endo-UP platform rely on the electroconductive technology for shockwave generation.
The electroconductive technology, which is derived from the electrohydraulic technology on which the first ESWL lithotripters
were based, permits improved focusing of the shockwave, reduces the variability in the shockwave pressure and allows a better
transfer of energy to the calculus. These features result in a faster, more effective treatment as compared to electrohydraulic
lithotripters.
The
UDS division’s ESWL customers are located worldwide and have historically been principally large hospitals, urology clinics
and research institutions. To increase its penetration of the market segment of smaller hospitals and outpatient clinics, the
UDS division developed the Sonolith i-move, an electroconductive lithotripter designed for smaller clinics. It is more compact
than the Sonolith i-sys, which is more fully integrated and dedicated to larger hospitals and can be used as a urological workstation
to perform endourological procedures. The Sonolith i-move offers a wide range of configurations to suit various budgets and various
local market needs. Our ESWL range has also been very successful thanks to its innovative Visio-Track ultrasound stone localization:
a unique three-dimensional virtual system that uses infrared stereovision proprietary technology to guide the treatment robotically.
The
recently introduced Endo-UP platform is designed for the management of urinary stones. EDAP’s new complete urology platform
combines a fully dedicated endourology table with X-ray and Ultrasound imaging systems, an integrated shockwave generator together
with an Holmium laser source. This unique all-in-one concept will allow surgeons to choose from among multiple stone treatment
strategies, including ESWL, Ureteroscopy (URS), Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL), or even a combination of therapeutic approaches.
UDS Division
Patents and Intellectual Property
As of December 31,
2019, the UDS division’s patent portfolio contained 12 granted patents consisting of two patents in the United States, eight
patents in the European Union and Japan and two patents in Israel and the rest of the world. During 2019, one patent covering
ultrasound stone tracking has been delivered in the United States.
These patents belong
to five groups of patents covering key technologies relating to ESWL systems and associated software capabilities. The UDS division’s
patents cover both piezoelectric and electroconductive technologies associated to ESWL generator, localization systems and device
design. The UDS division’s ongoing R&D objectives in ESWL are to further increase the clinical efficacy, the cost-effectiveness
and the ease of use of its products to make them accessible to wider patient and user populations.
As with the development
of our HIFU technology, we cooperated with INSERM to develop our ESWL technology. This cooperation gave rise to co-owned patents
in some cases. We have entered in the past into various license agreements with INSERM whereby we committed to pay a fixed amount
of royalties to INSERM based on the net revenues generated from the sales of ESWL devices using co-owned patents. Under these
agreements, we had the exclusive right to the commercial use of the co-owned patents, including the right to out-license such
commercial rights. These license agreements expired in 2016, allowing EDAP to freely use the related patents.
UDS Division Regulatory Status
The Sonolith i-move
is cleared and available for commercial distribution in the European Union, South Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, Taiwan, Singapore,
Russia, Serbia, Peru, Colombia, Costa Rica, Argentina, Japan, the United States, Saudi Arabia,Mexico, Egypt, India, Indonesia,
Koweit, Palestine and Brazil.
The Sonolith i-sys is cleared and under active registration in the
European Union, South Korea, Canada, the United States, Peru, Colombia, Mexico, Costa Rica, Chile, Russia, Serbia, Japan, Malaysia,
Singapore, Vietnam, Saudi Arabia, China, Australia and Taiwan.
The UDS division
continues to provide disposables, replacement parts and services for the current installed base of Sonolith Praktis, even though
we discontinued the manufacture of these machines.
Endo-UP platform
is not yet CE cleared. The file to be submitted to European authorities for CE clearance is being finalized.
UDS Division Market Potential
We estimate that
roughly 5% of the world population suffers from kidney or ureteric stones during their lifetime and that urinary calculi are responsible
for 10% of urological hospital admissions worldwide. Although urinary calculi may be eliminated naturally by the body, natural
elimination is frequently accompanied by considerable pain and very often by serious complications, such as obstruction and infection
of the urinary tract.
Since
its introduction in clinical practice more than 35 years ago, ESWL has become the standard treatment for urinary calculi. ESWL
consists of fragmenting calculi within the body using extracorporeal shockwaves without any surgery. We believe that the market
for lithotripters includes both buyers looking for a sophisticated, higher-priced machine (generally hospitals and larger urology
clinics) and buyers looking for simpler and less expensive machines (typically smaller clinics). We also believe that after a
period of fast growth in the mid-1980s and early 1990s, the market for lithotripters is now mature and has become primarily a
replacement and service and maintenance market in most of the world. We believe that companies with a large installed base of
ESWL lithotripters will be most successful in the replacement market. Consequently, we intend to capitalize on our share of the
installed base of ESWL lithotripters to gain a significant position in the replacement market for those machines. Several geographical
opportunities remain in under-equipped countries or in some countries where the national health system strategy is being reviewed
for hospitals and clinics equipment. ESWL is today in competition with less costly stone laser devices. Consequently, in order
to remain competitive, EDAP integrated stone laser products into its ESWL product range.
Finally, responding
to the rapidly evolving urinary stone treatment paradigm, the Company’s new complete Endo-UP urology platform combines a
fully dedicated endourology table with X-ray and Ultrasound imaging systems, an integrated shockwave generator and an Holmium
laser source. The idea of having all the tools instantaneously available to surgeons, and providing surgeons with the ability
to select the best approach or combination of treatment approaches depending on the patient and the stone represents a true breakthrough
in the management of urinary stones.
We expect the ESWL
business to continue to contribute, at historically consistent levels, to the UDS division’s financial results despite the
mature nature of the market, due to revenues from maintenance contracts and demand for replacement machines. See Item 5, ‘‘Operating
and Financial Review and Prospects’’.
UDS Division
Competition
The ESWL market
is characterized by severe price competition among manufacturers, with the result that, in recent years, the average unit price
of ESWL lithotripters has declined. The UDS division expects this trend to continue. See Item 5, ‘‘Operating and Financial
Review and Prospects.’’ The UDS division’s major competitors in developed countries are Wolf, Storz Medical
and Dornier Medtech.
UDS Division
Sales and Distribution of Products
The UDS division
markets, sells and services its products through our direct sales and service platform in France, Italy, Germany, the United States,
Japan, South Korea, Malaysia and, most recently, in the United Arab Emirates through our representative office in Dubai. The UDS
division also markets its products through agents and third-party distributors in several other countries.
The UDS division’s
customers are located worldwide and have historically been mainly public and private hospitals and urology clinics. We believe
that the division’s customer base provides it with excellent access to the urological community and enables it to introduce
new products and conduct trials under satisfactory conditions.
No single customer
of the UDS division represents a significant portion of the division’s installed base. The UDS division’s marketing
efforts include the organization of training programs for urologists worldwide.
The UDS division
is also pursuing various distribution options that use its strong network of worldwide subsidiaries and agents. In Japan, the
UDS division distributes urodynamics products on behalf of Laborie Company and also distributes x-ray imaging systems for the
diagnosis of musculoskeletal pathologies and orthopedic surgical care on behalf of French company EOS Imaging (recently acquired
by the U.S. based company Alphatec Holdings). In France, the UDS division distributes laser urology solutions from Lumenis and
from Quanta System in Asia and the Middle East. It also distributes Innovex flexible ureterorenoscopes products in France on behalf
of the Chinese company Shanghai Anqing Medical Instrument Co. Ltd. We believe that the laser use in endo-urology will increase
in the coming years, for both the treatment of urinary stones and for other urological procedures such as HoLEP (Holmium Laser
Enucleation of Prostate). We believe that the UDS division can successfully market its worldwide distribution platform to a wide
range of medical equipment development companies, thus allowing for quick, easy and economically sound entry for these companies
into markets covering most of the world.
Manufacturing
Our current manufacturing
operations consist of manufacturing medical products in our facility, which is FDA-approved and certified under international
ISO 13485: 2016 standards. We believe that this facility could possibly extend its outsourced services to provide device and disposable
development and manufacturing services to a range of medical equipment development companies. Each division manufactures its own
products through EDAP TMS France.
We manufacture
the critical components for our devices and accessories, unless a subcontractor can manufacture the component more cost-effectively,
and we also perform final assembly and quality control processes and maintain our own set of production standards. We purchase
the majority of the raw materials used in our products from a number of suppliers, but for several components of our products,
we rely on a single source. Furthermore, we conduct regular quality audits of suppliers’ manufacturing facilities. Our principal
suppliers are located in France, Germany, Denmark, South Korea and the United States. Management believes that the relationships
with our suppliers are good.
Quality and Design Control
The manufacturing
operations of EDAP TMS France must comply with all regulations of countries where we market our products, including the GMP regulations
enacted by the FDA, which establish requirements for assuring quality by controlling components, processes and document traceability
and retention, among other things. EDAP TMS France’s facilities are also subject to inspections performed by the FDA. EDAP
TMS France is ISO 13485: 2016 certified which indicates compliance by EDAP TMS France’s manufacturing facilities with international
standards for quality assurance, design and manufacturing process control. EDAP TMS France also complies with the applicable requirements
that will allow it to affix the CE Marking to certain of its products. Our manufacturing site also complies with Taiwanese, Japanese
and Canadian regulations, as well as with the U.S. Quality System Regulation. See ‘‘Information on the Company—Government
Regulation—Healthcare Regulation in the United States’’ and ‘‘—Government Regulation—Healthcare
Regulation in the European Union.’’
Organizational Structure
The following
table sets forth the fully consolidated subsidiaries of the Company as of the date of this annual report:
Name of the Company
|
|
Jurisdiction of Establishment
|
|
Percentage Owned(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
EDAP TMS France SAS
|
|
France
|
|
|
100%
|
|
EDAP Technomed Inc.
|
|
United States
|
|
|
100%
|
|
EDAP Technomed Co. Ltd
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
100%
|
|
EDAP Technomed Sdn Bhd
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
100%
|
|
EDAP Technomed Srl(2)
|
|
Italy
|
|
|
100%
|
|
EDAP TMS GmbH
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
(1)
|
Percentage of equity capital owned
by EDAP TMS S.A. directly or indirectly through subsidiaries (percentage of capital owned
and voting rights are the same).
|
|
(2)
|
EDAP Technomed Srl is currently
in liquidation process
|
Property and Equipment
We have one principal
facility, which is located in Vaulx-en-Velin, on the outskirts of Lyon, France. The premises comprise 4,150 square meters and
are leased to us under a renewable ten-year commercial lease agreement signed on July 1, 2015. We use this facility to manufacture
our device portfolio. We believe the terms of the lease reflect commercial practice and market rates. We are not aware of any
environmental issues that could affect utilization of the facility.
In addition, we
lease office and/or warehouse facilities in Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia), Rome (Italy), Flensburg (Germany), Austin (U.S.), Moscow
(Russia), Seoul (South Korea), Fukuoka, Osaka, Sapporo and Tokyo (Japan) and Dubai (United Arab Emirates).
Government Regulation
Government regulation
in our major markets, in particular the United States, the European Union and Japan, is a significant factor in the development
and marketing of our products and in our ongoing research and development activities. See Item 3, “Risk Factors –Risks
Related to Government Regulations.”
Regulation
in the United States
We and our products
are regulated in the United States by the FDA under a number of statutes including the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (‘‘FDC
Act’’). Pursuant to the FDC Act, the FDA regulates the preclinical and clinical testing, manufacturing, labeling,
distribution, sale, marketing, advertising and promotion of medical devices in the United States. Medical devices are classified
in the United States into one of three classes - Class I, II or III - on the basis of the controls reasonably necessary to ensure
their safety and effectiveness. Class I devices are those whose safety and effectiveness can be ensured through general controls,
such as establishment and registration, medical device listing, FDA-mandated CGMP and labeling. Most Class I devices are exempt
from premarket notification (510(k)). Class II devices are those whose safety and effectiveness can reasonably be ensured through
the use of general controls and ‘‘special controls,’’ such as special labeling requirements, mandatory
performance standards, and post-market surveillance. Class II medical devices require 510(k) submission and clearance. The FDA
may also require the submission of clinical data as part of the 510(k) for Class II devices. The FDA introduced the de novo 510(k)
process for novel devices that present low to moderate risk where there is no suitable predicate device to support a standard
510(k) submission. Class III devices are those that require submission of a PMA by the FDA to ensure their safety and effectiveness.
The PMA process is expensive and often lengthy, typically requiring several years, and may not necessarily result in approval.
The manufacturer or the distributor of the device must obtain an IDE approval from the FDA before commencing human clinical trials
in the United States in support of the PMA. Some newer PMA devices must also go before a clinical review panel before FDA approval.
Our lithotripsy range of products is now classified by the FDA as Class II devices. As far as our Ablatherm or
Focal One HIFU devices are concerned, they also have been classified as Class II. Advertising and promotional activities
in the United States are subject to regulation by the FDA and, in certain instances, by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission. The
FDC Act also regulates quality and manufacturing procedures by requiring us to demonstrate and maintain compliance with current
Quality System Regulations (QSR). Our manufacturing facilities are in compliance with the requirements of the QSR.
Regulation
in the European Union
In the European
Union, we annually perform ISO 13485: 2016 certification audits, showing that we comply with standards for quality assurance,
manufacturing and design control.
In 2017, the European
Union enacted the new Medical Device Regulation (“MDR”). Manufacturers with currently approved medical devices in
their portfolio have had a transition time of three years, i.e. until May 26, 2020 to meet new MDR requirements. The MDR introduces
substantial changes to the way medical device manufacturers bring their devices to the European market and how they maintain compliance
throughout the product's life cycle. MDR will replace the EU’s current Medical Device Directive (93/42/EEC) (“MDD”).
We are currently updating our organization and quality system as well as our product development to be able to handle the MDR
enforcement within the expected timelines for our existing devices ranges and the devices under development. We have implemented
regulatory actions to ensure our devices may be marketed in the European and international markets after May 2020.
The MDD and the
MDR provide that medical devices that meet certain safety standards must bear a certification of conformity, the European Community
approval ‘‘CE Marking.’’ Except in limited circumstances, member
states of the European Union may not prohibit or restrict the sale, free movement or use for its intended purpose of a
medical device bearing the CE Marking. Medical devices marketed throughout the European Union must comply with the requirement
of the MDD and MDR as applicable to bear a CE Marking (subject to certain exceptions).
Pursuant to the
MDD and MDR, medical devices are classified into different classes on the basis of their invasiveness and the duration of their
use. The classification serves as a basis for determining the conformity assessment procedures that apply to medical devices to
be eligible to receive a CE Marking. The conformity assessment procedures for Class I devices can be carried out, as a general
rule, under the sole responsibility of the manufacturer, while for devices of other classes, the involvement of a notified body
is required. The extent of the involvement of such body in the development and manufacturing of a device varies according to the
class under which it falls, with Class III devices being subject to the greatest degree of supervision. All of the devices currently
marketed by us are Class IIb devices.
Regulation in Japan
The import and
sales of medical devices in Japan is regulated by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (‘the “MHLW’’)
under the license “Marketing Authorization Holder” Our Japanese subsidiary has obtained a general license as well
as specific approvals to import our products that have been approved in Japan. Our Japanese subsidiary is also operating under
the statute of Designated Marketing Authorization Holder (“DMAH”) on behalf of some companies to act as their representative
in the Japanese Territory, before Japanese regulatory authorities. The MHLW also administers various national health insurance
programs to which each Japanese citizen is required to subscribe. These programs cover, among other things, the cost of medical
devices used in operations. The MHLW establishes a price list of reimbursable prices applicable to certain medical devices under
the national health insurance programs and until a new device is included in this list its costs are not covered by the programs.
The LT02, the Sonolith Praktis, the Sonolith Vision, the Sonolith i-sys and the Sonolith i-move are all included on the MHLW’s
list for reimbursement.
Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review
and Prospects
The following
discussion of our results of operations and liquidity and capital resources for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 2018
and 2017 is based on, and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included
in Item 18 of this annual report. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and refer
to the new topic-based FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
The following discussion
contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those
contained in such forward-looking statements. See ‘‘Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Information’’
at the beginning of this annual report.
Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion
and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon the consolidated financial statements, which
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these
financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues
and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including
those related to revenue recognition, accounts receivable, bad debts, inventories, warranty obligations, employee stock-option
plans, goodwill impairment, provisions for retirement indemnities, litigation and deferred tax assets. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates
and assumptions form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe our more
significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements are made in connection with
the following critical accounting policies.
Revenue Recognition
The Company adopted
ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, on January 1, 2018.
The Company’s
revenue consists of:
- Sales of goods
(devices and consumables), where invoicing takes place upon delivery.
- Revenue-per-Procedures
(“RPP”) and leases: they comprise (i) revenues on a per treatment basis which are invoiced after each treatment, or
in advance, or on a periodic basis, (ii) leases of devices, which are generally invoiced on a monthly or quarterly basis, and
(iii) lease components arising from multiple-element arrangements, where specific sales terms are negotiated in accordance with
each customer’s individual requirements and which are generally invoiced based on contract terms,
- Sales of spare
parts and services (maintenance, upgrades, mobility and others). Spare parts are invoiced when delivered. Regarding services,
invoicing is performed either on a subscription basis (in advance or at the end of the period) or when services are performed.
The Company invoices
its customers based on the billing schedules in its sales arrangements. Payments are generally due between one to three months
from the date of invoice.
The Company accounts
for a contract with a customer when there is a legally enforceable contract between the Company and its customer, the rights of
the goods or services and their payment terms can be identified, the contract has commercial substance, collectability of the
contract consideration is probable, it is approved and the parties are committed to their obligations.
Our sale arrangements
may contain multiple elements, including device(s), consumables and services. For these multiple-element arrangements, the Company
accounts for individual goods and services as separate performance obligations: (i) if they are a distinct good or service that
is separately identifiable from other items in the multiple-element arrangement; and (ii) if a customer can benefit from the good
or service on its own or with other resources that are readily available to the customer. The Company’s sale arrangements
may include a combination of the following performance obligations: device(s), consumables, leases and services (such as, but
not limited to, warranty extension).
For multiple-element arrangements, revenue
is allocated to each performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price. Standalone selling prices are based
on observable prices at which the Company separately sells the goods or services. If a standalone selling price is not directly
observable, then the Company estimates the standalone selling price considering market conditions and entity-specific factors
including, but not limited to, features and functionality of the goods and services, geographies, and type of customer. The Company
regularly reviews standalone selling prices and updates these estimates as necessary.
The Company recognizes revenue when the performance
obligations are satisfied by transferring control over the good or service to a customer.
The Company’s revenue consists of the
following:
Sales of goods:
Sales of goods are and
have historically been comprised of net sales of medical devices (ESWL lithotripters and HIFU devices) and net sales of disposables
(mostly Ablapaks and Focalpaks in the HIFU division and electrodes in the UDS division). Sales of goods also includes products
such as urology laser and urodynamics devices distributed through our agents and third-party distributors.
For devices and disposables, revenue is recognized
when the Company transfers control to the customer (i.e. when the customer has the ability to direct the use of, and obtain substantially
all of the remaining benefit from, the device or disposables), which is generally at the point of delivery or installation, depending
on the terms of the arrangement (i.e. when the customer can use the good to provide services or sell or exchange the good), and
based on contractual incoterms.
The Company’s sales arrangements do not provide a right of return. The goods are generally
covered by a period of one to two years standard warranty upon installation. The Company also provides training associated with
the sales of goods; such training-related costs are immaterial in the context of the contract with the customer and do not constitute
a distinct performance obligation.
Sales of RPPs
and leases:
Sales of RPP and
leases include the revenues from the sale of treatment procedures and from the leasing of machines. We provide machines to clinics
and hospitals for free for a limited period, rather than selling the devices. These hospitals and clinics perform treatments using
the devices and usually pay us based on the number of individual treatments provided.
Revenues related
to the sale of treatments invoiced on a ‘‘Revenue-Per-Procedure’’ (‘‘RPP’’) basis
are recognized when the treatment procedure has been completed. Revenues from devices leased to customers under operating leases
are recognized on a straight-line basis.
Regarding multiple-element
arrangements with a lease component, a portion of the contract is allocated to the lease component on the basis of observable
market prices applied by the Company for similar devices under operating leases. The lease component is recognized on a straight
line basis over the contractual period. Other components under the contract are recognized in accordance with their nature.
Sales of spare
parts and services:
Revenues related
to spare parts are recognized when spare parts are delivered to distributors who perform their own maintenance services. Spare
parts used in the performance of EDAP’s own maintenance and repair services are generally not recognized separately, unless
specified in the contract.
Revenues related
to services mainly consist of maintenance contracts which rarely exceed one year and are recognized on a straight line basis over
the term of the service period as the customer benefits from the service throughout the service contract period. For services
rendered when no maintenance contract is in place or for services not included in the scope of a maintenance contract, revenues
are recorded when services are performed.
The Company recognizes
revenue for extended warranties included in the multiple-element arrangements as a separate performance obligation in sales of
services on a straight-line basis over the extended warranty period. In the majority of countries in which the Company operates,
the statutory warranty period is one to two years and the extended warranty covers periods beyond this statutory period. Standard
warranties do not constitute a separate performance obligation. The Company accrues for the warranty costs at the time of sale
of the device through the multiple-element arrangement.
Agents and
distributors:
As part of its
sale process in countries other than continental France, when the Company does not have a local subsidiary, sales of goods to
end-customers are performed through agent and distributors. Such agent and distributors are primarily responsible for the sales’
process, bear the inventory risk, and are free to determine the sale prices. Sales of goods to agents and distributors are recognized
at the time of the sale to the related agent or distributor, based on contractual incoterms.
Deferred revenue:
Deferred revenue
for the periods presented primarily relates to service contracts where the service fees are billed up-front, generally quarterly
or annually, prior to those services having been performed, and consists primarily of billing or cash receipts in advance of services
due under maintenance contracts or extended warranty contracts. The associated deferred revenue is generally recognized ratably
over the service period.
Disaggregation of revenue:
Disaggregation
by primary geographical market, and timing of revenue recognition is reported in Note 17.
Contract Balances:
Details on contract liabilities
are reported on Note 10.
The Company applies
the practical expedient in paragraph 606-10-50-14 and does not disclose information about remaining performance obligations that
have original expected durations of one year or less. This relates mainly to maintenance services.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
We evaluate the
collectability of our accounts receivable based on the individual circumstances of each customer on a quarterly basis. In circumstances
where we are aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to us (e.g., bankruptcy filings,
substantial downgrading of credit scores), we record a specific reserve for bad debts against amounts due to reduce the net recognized
receivable to the amount we reasonably believe we will collect. If circumstances change (i.e. higher than expected defaults or
an unexpected material adverse change in a major customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations to us), our estimates
of the recoverability of amounts due to us could be reduced by a material amount.
Operating Results
Overview
Total revenues
include sales of our medical devices and sales of disposables (“sales of goods”), sales of RPPs and leases, and sales
of spare parts and services, all net of commissions, as well as other revenues.
Sales of goods have
historically been comprised of net sales of medical devices (ESWL lithotripters and HIFU devices) and net sales of disposables
(mostly Ablapaks and Focalpaks in the HIFU division and electrodes in the UDS division). Sales of goods also included products
such as urology laser and urodynamics devices distributed through our agents and third-party distributors. The sale price of our
medical devices is subject to variation based on a number of factors, including market competition, warranties and payment terms.
Consequently, a particular sale of a medical device may, depending on its terms, result in significant fluctuations in the average
unit sale price of the product for a given period, which may not be indicative of a market trend.
Sales of RPP and
leases include the revenues from the sale of Ablatherm and Focal One treatment procedures and from the leasing of Ablatherm and
Focal One devices. We provide Ablatherm and Focal One devices to clinics and hospitals for free for a limited period, rather than
selling the devices. These hospitals and clinics perform treatments using the devices and usually pay us based on the number of
individual treatments provided. With this business model, the hospital or clinic does not make an initial investment until the
increase in patient demand justifies the purchase of a HIFU device. Consequently, we are able to make Ablatherm or Focal One treatments
available to a larger number of hospitals and clinics, which we believe should serve to create more long-term interest in the
product. Compared to the sale of devices, this business model initially generates a smaller, although more predictable stream
of revenue and, if successful, should lead to more purchases of Ablatherm and Focal One devices by hospitals and clinics in the
long term.
In 2019, 2018 and
2017, our UDS sales activity benefited from the success
of our ESWL devices, together with a sustained commercial
effort in distributing additional urology devices which allowed us to capture market share worldwide. We believe that the market
for ESWL lithotripters is now mature and has become primarily a replacement and maintenance market, with intense competition.
As a result, we expect total market volumes for our UDS Division to remain stable in the foreseeable future. The commercialization
of our high-end Endo-UP platform for the management of stone diseases should contribute to the stability of our UDS Division’s
activity.
Sales of spare parts
and services include revenues arising from maintenance services furnished by us for the installed base of ESWL lithotripters and
HIFU devices.
We derive a significant portion of both net
sales of medical devices and disposables and net sales of spare parts and services from our operations in Asia, through our wholly-owned
subsidiaries or representative offices in Japan (Edap Technomed Co. Ltd), Malaysia (Edap Technomed Sdh Bhd) and South Korea (Edap
Technomed Korea). Net sales derived from our operations in Asia represented approximately 40% of our total consolidated net sales
in 2019. Net sales of goods in Asia represented approximately 46% of such sales in 2019 and consisted mainly of sales of urology
devices and disposables. Net sales of spare parts, supplies and services in Asia represented approximately 39% of such sales in
2019 and related primarily to ESWL lithotripters, reflecting the fact that approximately 50% of the installed base of our ESWL
lithotripters that we actively maintain or otherwise serve is located in Asia. See Note 28 of our consolidated financial statements.
We sell our products in many parts of the world and, as a result, our business is affected by fluctuations in currency exchange
rates. We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk because the mix of currencies in which our costs are denominated
is different from the mix of currencies in which we earn revenues. In 2019, approximately 57% of our costs of sales and research
and development, selling, marketing and general and administrative expenses were denominated in euro, while approximately 51%
of our sales were denominated in currencies other than euro (primarily the U.S. Dollar and Japanese yen). Our operating profitability
could be materially affected by large fluctuations in the rate of exchange between the euro and such other currencies. To minimize
our exposure to exchange rate risks, we sometimes use certain financial instruments for hedging purposes. See Item 3, ‘‘Risk
Factors—We sell our products in many parts of the world and, as a result, our business is affected by fluctuations in currency
exchange rates’’ and Item 11, ‘‘Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk’’
for a description of the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on our business and results of operations.
Reserves for slow-moving
and obsolete inventory are determined based upon quarterly reviews of all inventory items. Items which are not expected to be
sold or used in production, based on management’s analysis, are written down to their net realizable value, which is their
fair market value or zero in the case of spare parts or disposable parts for devices that are no longer in commercial production.
Consolidated research
and development expenses include all costs related to the development of new technologies and products and the enhancement of
existing products, including the costs of organizing clinical trials and of obtaining patents and regulatory approvals. We do
not capitalize any of our research and development expenses, except for the expenses relating to the production of machines to
be used in clinical trials and that have alternative future uses as equipment or components for future research projects.
Consolidated research
and development expenses, as described above, amounted to €3.7 million, €4.1million and €3.9 million in 2019, 2018
and 2017, respectively, representing approximately 8.3%, 10.4% and 10.9% of total revenues in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Research and development government grants and tax credits are deducted from our consolidated research and development expenses
for amounts of €1.0 million, €0.8 million and €0.7 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Beginning in 2020,
management expects the budget for research and development expenses in Europe to increase at approximately 10.6% of total revenues,
which we expect will allow us to maintain our strategy to launch new clinical studies (thus strengthening our clinical credibility),
to continue to focus our efforts on obtaining regulatory approvals in Japan in particular, and reimbursement in key countries,
to continue to develop our HIFU and ESWL product range and to fund projects to expand the use of HIFU beyond the treatment of
prostate cancer.
Consolidated selling
and marketing expenses amounted to €10.9 million in 2019, €10.6 million in 2018 and €9.5 million in 2017. Selling
and marketing expenses included net impact of allowances for doubtful accounts of €0.1 million in 2019, €0.4 million
in 2018 and €0.1 million in 2017. The €0.3 million or 2.8% increase in selling and marketing expenses from 2018 to 2019
was primarily a result of the increase in global sales and marketing activity. Management expects marketing and sales efforts
to stay at significant levels in the future to consolidate the Ablatherm and Focal One HIFU technology’s status as a standard
of care for prostate pathologies, and to sustain the Company’s worldwide market position in urology. Beginning in 2020,
management expects selling and marketing expenses to continue to increase in view of the Company’s expansion.
The novel COVID-19 virus which has profoundly
impacted the whole worldwide economy in early 2020 represents a new challenge for us all. We are currently closely monitoring
the situation and have implemented numerous precautions and protective measures to safeguard our employees and to ensure an uninterrupted
supply of our devices and disposables, including requiring the majority of our employees to work remotely, maintaining minimum
supply chain activity and curtailing all business travel. Further, from April 1, 2020, our facility in Lyon, France has been closed
with only minimal staff to expedite shipments of disposals at planned intervals. In the near term, we expect this situation to
continue to cause decreased activity in our recurring usual business activity with some cancellations of ESWL and HIFU treatments.
We also anticipate that device sales projects may be postponed on a near-term basis as hospital purchase and investment decisions
are put on hold. However, our sales cycles are long and we have in inventory several devices and accessories that are ready to
be shipped when order activity resumes. The Company therefore hopes to be well positioned to resume delivery activities as soon
as that becomes possible. Importantly, in this unique and unknown global crisis, EDAP has a solid cash position, which is expected
to minimize disruption to the extent possible. . See Item 3. ‘‘Risk Factors” and “—Liquidity and
Capital Resources.’’
Fiscal Year Ended December
31, 2019 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2018
We report our segment
information on a “net contribution” basis, so that each segment’s results comprise the elimination of our intra-group
revenues and expenses and thus reflect the true contribution to consolidated results of the segment. See Note 28 to our consolidated
financial statements.
(in millions of euros)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
44.9
|
|
|
|
39.2
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
|
44.9
|
|
|
|
39.2
|
|
Of which HIFU
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
Of which UDS
|
|
|
30.8
|
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
Total cost of sales
|
|
|
(23.9
|
)
|
|
|
(22.3
|
)
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
Gross profit as a percentage of total net sales
|
|
|
46.8%
|
|
|
|
43.2%
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
(18.8
|
)
|
|
|
(18.2
|
)
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Total revenues
Our total revenues
increased 14.6% from €39.2 million in 2018 to €44.9 million in 2019.
HIFU division.
The HIFU division’s total revenues increased by 28.1% from
€11.0 million in 2018 to €14.1 million in 2019.
The HIFU division’s
net sales of medical devices increased 63.8% to €5.9 million in 2019, with two Ablatherm units and eleven Focal One units
sold, as compared to €3.6
million, with one Ablatherm and six Focal One units sold in 2018. This growth is primarily driven by the US market activity since
we sold nine HIFU devices in the U.S. in 2019 as compared to two in 2018.
Treatment-driven
revenue, which includes net sales of RPP & leases, net sales of disposables and treatments related services, increased by
15.3% to €7.0 million in 2019.
Net sales of HIFU
maintenance services slightly decreased from €1.3 million in 2018 to €1.2 million in 2019 in spite of the increase of
the installed base, since new sold machines are still under warranty.
Other HIFU-related
revenues increased to €52 thousand in 2019 from €19 thousand in 2018 and were comprised of license-based revenues from
Theraclion and training to customers.
UDS division.
The UDS division’s total revenues increased 9.3 % from €28.1 million in 2018 to €30.8 million in 2019, mostly
due to the increase in distribution products both in machines and consumables revenues.
The UDS division’s
net sales of medical devices increased 6.3% from €15.3 million in 2018 to €16.3 million in 2019 with 28 ESWL devices
sold in 2019 compared to 33 ESWL units sold in 2018. The increase was driven by a 15% growth in the sales of distribution machines.
Net sales of UDS-related
consumables, spare parts, supplies, RPP, leasing and services increased 13.0% from €12.8 million in 2018 to €14.5 million
in 2019, as a result of the larger installed base of UDS machines and the development of the distribution products revenues.
Cost of sales.
Cost of sales increased
7.4% from €22.3 million in 2018 to €23.9 million in 2019, and represented 53.3% as a percentage of net sales in 2019,
down from 56.9% as a percentage of net sales in 2018. This improvement is driven primarily by the increase in the percentage of
HIFU revenue to overall revenue (since HIFU activity has better margin than UDS); and the effect of the increase of net sales
on the fixed costs.
Operating
expenses.
Operating expenses
increased 3.1%, or €0.6 million, from €18.2 million in 2018 to €18.8 million in 2019.
Marketing and sales
expenses increased €0.3 million, or 2.8% at €10.9 million, reflecting the sales and marketing efforts on expanding the
business.
Research and development
expenses decreased 8.8% at €3.7 million in 2019 from €4.1 million in 2018, which included regulatory expenses for the
Focal One clearance in the U.S., and are net of R&D grants and tax credits of €1.0 million in 2019 and €0.8 million
2018.
General and administrative
expenses increased 17.6% to €4.2 million in 2019, mainly due to the higher level of activity and the implementation of the
SAP program.
Operating
profit (loss).
As a result of the
factors discussed above, we recorded a consolidated operating income of €2.2 million in 2019,
as compared to a consolidated operating loss of €1.3 million in 2018.
We realized an operating
profit in the HIFU division of €0.5 million in 2019, as compared with an operating loss of €2.3 million in 2018, and
an operating profit in the UDS division of €3.0 million in 2019, as compared to an operating profit of €2.3 million
in 2018.
Financial
(expense) income, net.
Net financial expense was €0.1 million in 2019, compared with
a net financial income of €0.8 million in 2018, including a €0.9 million income
due to fair value adjustments of warrants. There were no more outstanding warrants at the end of 2018 and 2019.
In 2019, we recorded a net foreign currency exchange income of €0.1
million, mainly due to the variation of the Euro against the U.S. Dollar and the Japanese Yen, compared to an income of €0.5
million in 2018.
Income taxes.
Income tax was an
expense of €0.7 million in 2019, compared to an expense of 0.4 million in 2018, reflecting the growth of the Income before
taxes
Net income
/ (loss)
As a result of the
above, we realized a consolidated net income of €1.5 million in 2019 compared with a consolidated net loss of €0.3 million
in 2018.
Fiscal Year Ended December
31, 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2017
The discussion of our operating and financial review and prospects for the years ended
December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 can be found in Part I, Item 5 ‘‘Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
– Operating Results’’ of our Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on April 12, 2019, which is available on our Company’s
website, in the Investors section (www.edap-tms.com/investors information / Financial Information / SEC filings”) and on
the SEC’s website via EDGAR. The contents of our website is not incorporated by reference or otherwise included in this Annual
Report on Form 20-F.
Effect of Inflation
Management believes
that the impact of inflation was not material to our net sales or loss from operations in the three years ended December 31, 2019.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Our cash flow
has historically been subject to significant fluctuations over the course of any given financial year due to cyclical demand for
medical devices. Cyclical demand has historically resulted in significant annual and quarterly fluctuations in trade and other
receivables and inventories, and therefore led to significant variations in working capital requirements and operating cash flows
that were not necessarily indicative of changes in our business. We believe our working capital is sufficient for our present
working capital requirements although we have in the past experienced negative cash flows and associated risks to liquidity, and
may in the future experience the same. Our cash flow situation is
described in more detail below.
We anticipate that
cash flow in future periods will be derived mainly from ongoing operations. As of the date of this annual report we do not employ
any off-balance sheet financing. Because we anticipate relying principally on cash and cash equivalent balances to meet our liquidity
requirements, a decrease in the demand for our products, or the inability of our customers to meet their financial obligations
to us due to operating difficulties or adverse market conditions, would reduce the availability of funds to us.
(in thousands of euros)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash generated by/(used in) in operating activities
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
(3,059
|
)
|
Net cash generated by/(used in) in investing activities
|
|
|
(1,532
|
)
|
|
|
(1,569
|
)
|
|
|
(2,032
|
)
|
Net cash generated by/(used in) in financing activities
|
|
|
(664
|
)
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
|
2,871
|
|
Net effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
(323
|
)
|
|
|
235
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,422
|
|
|
|
(539
|
)
|
|
|
(1,985
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year
|
|
|
19,464
|
|
|
|
20,004
|
|
|
|
21,989
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year
|
|
|
20,886
|
|
|
|
19,464
|
|
|
|
20,004
|
|
Our cash position
as of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, was €20.9 million (with no short-term treasury investments), €19.5 million (with
no short-term treasury investments) and €20.0 million (with no short-term treasury investments), respectively. We experienced
positive cash flows of €1.4 million in 2019, negative cash flows of €0.5 million in 2018 and negative cash flows of
€2.0 million in 2017.
In 2019, our positive net cash flow was primarily
due to the high level of cash generated by operating activities, partly offset by cash used in investing activities and
net cash used in financing activities which included a repayment of long term borrowing (€1.1 million). In 2018, our negative
net cash flow was primarily due to the high level of cash used in investing activities partly offset by net cash generated by
financing activities which included the new Long Term debt (€1.0 million) granted during the year. In 2017, our negative
net cash flow was primarily due to the negative cash flow from operations and the high level of cash used in investing activities.
In 2019, net cash generated by operating activities was €3.8 million compared with net cash generated by operating activities
of €0.2 million in 2018 and compared with net cash used in operating activities of €3.1 million in 2017.
In 2019, net cash
generated by operating activities reflected principally
|
-
|
a net income of €1.5 million;
|
|
-
|
elimination
of €2.3 million of net loss without effects on cash, including €1.9 million
of depreciation and amortization and €0.3 million of non-cash compensation linked
to stock-options plans;
|
|
-
|
an unchanged
level in working capital reflecting the growth of activity on the inventories level,
offset by the lower level of net sales recorded in December 2019 as compared to December
2018.
|
In 2018, net cash
generated by operating activities reflected principally
|
-
|
a net loss of €0.3million;
|
|
-
|
elimination
of €1.8 million of net loss without effects on cash, including a gain of €0.9
million due to fair value variations of financial instruments, €1.6 million of depreciation
and amortization, and €0.3 million of non-cash compensation linked to stock-options
plans;
|
|
-
|
an increase in working capital of €1.3
million reflecting the higher level of activity and the high level of net sales recorded
in December 2018 which has been collected in 2019.
|
In 2017, net cash
used in operating activities reflected principally:
|
-
|
a net loss of €0.7 million;
|
|
-
|
elimination
of €0.7 million of net gain without effects on cash, including a gain of €2.7
million due to fair value variations of financial instruments, €1.6 million of depreciation
and amortization, and €0.4 million of non-cash compensation linked to stock-options
plans;
|
|
-
|
an increase in trade accounts and other
receivables of €1.7 million;
|
|
-
|
a decrease in inventories of €0.7
million;
|
|
-
|
an increase in payables of €0.4
million;
|
|
-
|
a decrease in
accrued expenses and other current liabilities of €1.0 million.
|
In 2019, net cash
used in investing activities was €1.5 million compared with net cash used in investing activities of €1.6 million in
2018 and compared with net cash used in investing activities of €2.0 million in 2017.
Net cash used in
investing activities of €1.5 million in 2019 reflected mainly
|
-
|
investments
of €1.0 million in capitalized assets produced by the Company (devices), mostly
for RPP activity (€0.3 million), HIFU treatments probes (€0.4 million) and
R&D program (€0.3 million);
|
|
-
|
investment
of €0.4 million in property, equipment (including €0.2 million of equipment
for demo) and IT and offices equipment (€0.2 million).
|
Net cash used in
investing activities of €1.6 million in 2018 reflected
|
-
|
investments
of €0.8 million in capitalized assets produced by the Company (devices), mostly
for RPP activity (€0.3 million) and R&D program (€0.5 million),
|
|
-
|
investment
of €1.1 million in property, equipment (including €0.3 million of equipment
for mobile activity) and software (including new Enterprise Resource Planning “ERP”
implementation for €0.4 million),
|
|
-
|
and
net proceeds from sales of leased-back assets of €0.4 million.
|
Net cash used in
investing activities of €2.0 million in 2017 reflected
|
-
|
investments
of €1.0 million in capitalized assets produced by the Company (devices), mostly
for RPP activity (€0.5 million) and R&D program (€0.3 million)
|
|
-
|
investment
of €1.0 million in property, equipment and software (including new Enterprise Resource
Planning “ERP” implementation for €0.5 million),
|
|
-
|
and net
proceeds from sales of leased-back assets of €0.1 million.
|
In 2019,
net cash used in financing activities was €0.7 million compared with net cash generated in financing activities of €1.2
million in 2018 compared with a net cash generated in financing activities of €2.9 million in 2017.
Net cash used in financing
activities of €0.7 million in 2019 reflected principally the net proceeds of €0.3 million from the exercise of stock
options, the new long term borrowings of €0.7 million in Japan, the repayments of long-term borrowings and financing lease
for €1.5 million (including €0.7 million of early repayment in Japan) and a decrease of short-term borrowings of €0.2
million.
Net cash generated
in financing activities of €1.1 million in 2018 reflected principally the new long term borrowings of €1.0 million in
Germany and Japan, repayment of long-term borrowings and lease financing for €0.8 million and an increase of short-term borrowings
of €0.9 million.
Net cash generated
in financing activities of €2.9 million in 2017 reflected principally the net proceeds of €0.7 million from the exercise
of stock options and warrants, but also new long term borrowings of €0.8 million related to new investments financing, €0.8
million of conditional advances to finance the HECAM research project, repayment of long-term borrowings and lease financing for
€0.5 million and an increase of short-term borrowings of €1.1 million.
Our policy is that
our treasury department should maintain liquidity with the use of short-term borrowings and the minimal use of long-term borrowings.
The treasury department currently adheres to this objective by using fixed-rate debt, which normally consists of long-term borrowing
and with certain long-term borrowings consisting of sale and leaseback equipment financing. Currently the short-term debt consists
of account receivables factored and for which the Company is supporting the collection risk. We maintain bank accounts for each
of our subsidiaries in the local currencies of each subsidiary. The primary currencies in which we maintain balances are the euro,
the U.S. dollar and the Japanese yen. To minimize our exposure to exchange rate risks, we may use certain financial instruments
for hedging purposes from time to time. As of December 31, 2019, there were no outstanding hedging instruments. See Notes 13 and
14 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on our borrowings.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments as
of December 31, 2019 (in thousands of euro)
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Less than 1 year
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
4-5 years
|
|
More than 5 years
|
Short-Term Debt
|
|
|
3,513
|
|
|
|
3,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Financing Lease Obligations
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Operating Leases Obligations
|
|
|
2,684
|
|
|
|
958
|
|
|
|
1,210
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See “NOTE
1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES -- 1.25
Recent Accounting Pronouncements” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of recent accounting
pronouncements including the respective expected dates of adoption and estimated effects, if any, on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Research and Development,
Patents and Licenses
See “Item
5—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Operating
Results—Overview” and Item 4, ‘‘Information
on the Company—HIFU Division—HIFU Division Patents and Intellectual Property’’ and ‘‘Information
on the Company—UDS Division—UDS Division Patents and Intellectual Property.’’
The French government
provides tax credits to companies for innovative research and development. This tax credit is calculated based on a percentage
of eligible research and development costs and it can be refundable in cash.
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
At December 31,
2019, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements other than those specified in Note 13-1 of our consolidated financial statements.
Item 6. Directors, Senior Management
and Employees
Senior Executive
Officers
The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each
of our Senior Executive Officers as of April 16, 2020. The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer listed below
have entered into employment contracts with us or our subsidiaries (which permit the employee to resign subject to varying notice
periods). In addition, in case of a change of control of the Company, or of a termination of their employment contract by the Company
without cause, the Senior Executive Officers are entitled to receive severance packages totaling approximately €0.8 million.
Name
|
Position
|
|
|
Marc Oczachowski
|
Chief Executive Officer of EDAP
TMS S.A. and Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
Age: 50
|
President of EDAP TMS France SAS and EDAP Technomed, Inc.
|
|
Marc Oczachowski joined the Company in May 1997 as Area Sales Manager, based in Lyon, France. From March 2001 to January 2004, he held management positions as General Manager of EDAP Technomed Malaysia. He was appointed Chief Operating Officer of EDAP TMS in November 2004 and became Chief Executive Officer of the Company on March 31, 2007. From July 2012 to July 2017, he relocated to Austin, Texas to manage EDAP’s U.S. operations. On March 25, 2020, he was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors following Philippe Chauveau’s decision to step down from this position. Previously he worked for Sodem Systems, which manufactures orthopedic power tools, as Area Sales Manager. He is a graduate of Institut Commercial de Lyon, France.
|
|
|
|
François Dietsch
|
Chief Financial Officer of EDAP
TMS S.A.
|
Age: 44
|
François Dietsch joined EDAP in 2005 as Internal Audit and Consolidation Manager,
leading the implementation of internal controls for Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance, consolidation of financial statements from the Company's
subsidiaries and preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, including EDAP's Annual Report on Form 20-F.
In 2012, he was promoted to Group Financial Control Manager and Finance Manager of EDAP's French subsidiary where, in addition
to his previous responsibilities, he managed accounting firm relationships at the subsidiary level and was the primary liaison
between the Company and its external auditors. He also managed the Finance department at EDAP France. He was appointed Chief Financial
Officer of the Company on July 14, 2015. Prior to joining EDAP he held finance positions at Valeo, a leading global supplier of
components and systems to the automotive industry. He holds Master's Degrees in Management and Corporate Finance from University
of Paris Dauphine.
|
Board of Directors
The following table sets forth the names and backgrounds of the members
of the Board of Directors. On March 25, 2020, the Board of Directors accepted the resignation of Mr. Philippe Chauveau as Chairman
of the Board and, upon the recommendation of the Company’s Nomination Committee, the Board decided to combine the roles of
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, as permitted by the Company’s bylaws, and elected Mr. Marc Oczachowski
as the new Chairman of the Board of Directors. None of the directors has service contracts with the Company or any of its subsidiaries
providing for benefits upon termination of employment. Four Board members out of five are independent within the meaning of NASDAQ
Marketplace Rule 5605(2). The mandate of four of our Directors terminate in June 2020 at the General Meeting of Shareholders approving
the 2019 accounts. Mr. Philippe Chauveau’ will not renew his mandate as a Director in June 2020. Proposals with respect to
these positions on the Board of Directors will be made in due course and submitted to the vote of the shareholders at the General
Meeting of Shareholders approving the 2019 accounts.
Marc Oczachowski
Age: 50
Mandate: 6 years
Appointment: July 1, 2017
Expiration: 2022
|
Chairman of the Board. See Marc
Oczachowski’s biography above.
|
Philippe Chauveau
Age: 84
Mandate: 6 years
Appointment: April. 8, 1997 (renewed in 2014)
Expiration: 2019
|
Philippe Chauveau was named
chairman of EDAP TMS S.A.'s Supervisory Board in 1997 and resigned from his position of Chairman of the Board on March
25, 2020, when Marc Oczachowski was appointed Chairman. In 2002, the Company’s two-tiered board structure was replaced
by a single Board of Directors with Philippe Chauveau serving as Chairman and CEO until 2004 when he was succeeded as
CEO. From 2000 to 2007, Philippe Chauveau served as founding Chairman of the Board of Scynexis Inc., funded by private
equity, which is an innovative drug discovery company based in the United States. He was Vice-President of research and
development at AT&T Bell Labs and has also served as Chairman of Apple Computer Europe, preceded by increasing marketing
roles in ITT and in Procter & Gamble. He has an Honours Degree from Trinity College Dublin with a B.A. and a Bsc.
|
Pierre Beysson
Age: 78
Mandate: 6 years
Appointment:
September 27, 2002
(renewed in 2014)
Expiration: 2019
|
Pierre Beysson was appointed
as a member of the Board of Directors in September 2002. Pierre Beysson was then the Chief Financial Officer of Compagnie
des Wagons-Lits ("CWL"), the on-board train service division of Accor, a French multinational Hotel and Business
Services Group. In this capacity, he sat on a number of boards of companies related to the Accor Group. Before his assignment
at CWL, Pierre Beysson held a number of senior financial positions with Nixdorf Computers, Trane (Air Conditioning), AM
International (Office Equipment) and FMC (Petroleum Equipment). Pierre Beysson was trained as a CPA, has auditing experience
and holds an MBA from Harvard Business School.
|
Argil Wheelock
Age: 72
Mandate: 6 years
Appointment: June 25, 2009
(renewed in 2014)
Expiration: 2019
|
Dr. Argil Wheelock was elected
as a member of the Company's Board of Directors in June 2009. Dr. Wheelock, a U.S. board certified urologist, is currently
Senior Physician at the University of Tennessee Department of Urology at Erlanger Medical Center, a tertiary care and
teaching hospital in Chattanooga, Tennessee. He is Chief Medical Advisor to HealthTronics Inc., a privately held company.
HealthTronics is a leading U.S. provider of urological services and products. From 1996 to 2005, Dr. Wheelock served as
Chairman and CEO of HealthTronics, a publicly traded NASDAQ company where he was a founder. He has built a successful
track record introducing new medical devices to the U.S. and navigating the FDA approval process. He is widely known among
the U.S. urological community for bringing clinical benefits to patients and economic value to urology practices. Dr.
Wheelock graduated from the University of Tennessee College of Medicine and completed urological training at Mount Sinai
Hospital in New York City.
|
Rob Michiels
Age: 70
Mandate: 6 years
Appointment: July 16, 2009
(renewed in 2014)
Expiration: 2019
|
Rob Michiels was elected as
a member of the Company's Board of Directors in July 2009. He is a 40-year U.S. veteran of the medical device industry.
He most recently serves as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of CardiAQ Valve Technologies, a venture funded start-up developing
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Implantation which was acquired by Edwards Lifesciences during the second half of 2015.
He previously served as Chief Operating Officer (COO) of CoreValve (acquired by Medtronic); and as President and COO of
InterVentional Technologies (acquired by Boston Scientific). He helped drive both companies from cardiovascular start-ups
to established market leaders, using new and innovative technologies which have strong synergies to the HIFU story. Rob
Michiels is a director of Conveyor Ltd and FEops NV, all privately held companies developing cutting edge cardio-vascular
less-invasive Technologies. Rob Michiels is a founding partner of CONSILIUM, a medical device market research company
active in identifying, funding and greenhousing start-up technologies. Fluent in English, French and Dutch languages,
he holds a bachelor's degree in economics from Antwerp University in Belgium and a Master’s in business administration
(MBA) from Indiana University.
|
Compensation
Aggregate compensation
paid or accrued for services in all capacities by the Company and its subsidiaries to Senior Executive Officers and to the Board
of Directors as a group for the fiscal year 2019 was approximately €562 thousand including performance bonuses of €124
thousand and benefits in kind of €9 thousand (benefits in kind comprise car allowances for senior management). No amount
was set aside or accrued by us to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for Senior Executive Officers and to the Board
of Directors as a group in respect of the year 2019. For information regarding compensation paid in the form of stock options,
see “Directors, Senior Management and Employees -- Share Ownership” and “Directors, Senior Management and
Employees -- Options to Purchase or Subscribe for Securities.”
Compensation Committee
The Compensation
Committee is comprised of the following independent members: Mr. Philippe Chauveau, Mr. Pierre Beysson, Dr. Argil Wheelock and
Mr. Rob Michiels. The Committee gathers once a year to review the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, as per the approved
charter of the Compensation Committee, and to propose to the Board of Directors any changes to the Chief Executive Officer’s
compensation. The Chief Executive Officer is not present when the Compensation Committee reviews his compensation. In August 2014,
the Compensation Committee updated its charter which was subsequently approved by the Board of Directors. Following the next General
Meeting of shareholders approving the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019 and the elections of members of
our Board of Directors, scheduled in June 2020, the newly composed Board of Directors will elect a new independent Compensation
Committee.
Audit Committee
The Board of Directors’
Audit Committee comprises four independent members of the Board: Mr. Pierre Beysson, acting as Head of the Audit Committee and
financial expert, Mr. Philippe Chauveau, Dr. Argil Wheelock and Mr. Rob Michiels. The purpose of the Audit Committee, in accordance
with its annually approved charter, is as stated below, but not limited to:
|
-
|
Provide assistance
to the Board of Directors in fulfilling their oversight responsibility to the shareholders,
potential shareholders, the investment community and others relating to: the integrity
of our financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, our
accounting practices and financial reporting processes, the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting,
|
|
-
|
Review the
independent auditor’s qualifications, compensation and independence, and the performance
of our internal audit function and independent auditors,
|
|
-
|
Recommend
the appointment of the independent auditors for consideration and approval by the Company’s
shareholders in accordance with French law.
|
|
-
|
Review and
discuss annual financial statements with Management and independent auditors and prepare
the Audit Committee report, prior to SEC filings, as well as review related press releases.
|
|
-
|
Request any
officer or employee of the Company or our outside counsel or independent auditor to attend
a meeting of the Audit Committee or to meet with any members of, or consultants to, the
Audit Committee.
|
For more information
on the missions of our Audit Committee, please refer to our web site www.edap-tms.com, under the Investor Relations Section, where
our Audit Committee Charter is available.
Following the
next General Meeting of shareholders approving the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019 and the elections
of members of our Board of Directors, scheduled in June 2020, the newly composed Board of Directors will elect a new independent
Audit Committee.
Nomination Committee
The Company’s
Board of Directors recommends for the Board’s selection director nominees to submit to the vote of the Company’s shareholders.
In addition, under specified circumstances and in accordance with French law, shareholders may also submit resolutions to the
general meeting to appoint directors.
The Company’s
nominations practice is formalized in a Board resolution and at its Board meeting in February 2015, the Board resolved that in
the event that one or more directors is or are no longer independent, the Board will create a Nominations Committee (composed
exclusively of independent Directors). A Nominations Committee Charter was approved accordingly, the terms of which apply to the
Board of Directors when considering director nominees including evaluation of potential candidates, and recommendations to the
Board of Directors prior to submitting the candidates to the vote of shareholders. As per this Charter, upon the appointment of
Mr. Marc Oczachowski to the Board as a non-independent Director, on June 30, 2017, the Board of Directors, was convened on July
10, 2017, and decided to create a Nomination Committee composed exclusively of independent Directors. Following the next General
Meeting of shareholders approving the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019 and the elections of members of
our Board of Directors, scheduled in June 2020, the newly composed Board of Directors will elect a new independent Nomination
Committee.
Employees
As of December
31, 2019, we employed 216 individuals on a full-time basis, as follows:
|
|
Sales &
Marketing
|
|
Manufac-
turing
|
|
Service
|
|
Research
& Dvpt
|
|
Regula-
tory
|
|
Clinical
Affairs
|
|
Adminis-
trative
|
|
Total
|
France
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Italy
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
South Korea
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
USA
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Total
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
As of December
31, 2018, we employed 215 individuals on a full-time basis, as follows:
|
|
Sales &
Marketing
|
|
Manufac-
turing
|
|
Service
|
|
Research
& Dvpt
|
|
Regula-
tory
|
|
Clinical
Affairs
|
|
Adminis-
trative
|
|
Total
|
France
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
Italy
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
South Korea
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
USA
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Total
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
As of December
31, 2017, we employed 200 individuals on a full-time basis, as follows:
|
|
Sales &
Marketing
|
|
Manufac-
turing
|
|
Service
|
|
Research
& Dvpt
|
|
Regula-
tory
|
|
Clinical
Affairs
|
|
Adminis-
trative
|
|
Total
|
France
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Italy
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
South Korea
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
USA
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Total
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
Management considers
labor relations to be good. Employee benefits are in line with those specified by applicable government regulations.
Share Ownership
As of April 16, 2020, the total number of shares
issued was 29,433,994 with 292,428 shares held as treasury shares, thus bringing the total number of shares outstanding to 29.141.566.
As of April 16, 2020,
the Board of Directors and the Senior Executive Officers of the Company held a total of 77,923 Shares. The Board of Directors and
Senior Executive Officers beneficially own, in the aggregate less than 1% of the Company's shares.
As of April 16, 2020,
Senior Executive Officers held a total of 32,001 Shares and an aggregate of 540,000 options to purchase or to subscribe a total
of 540,000 ordinary shares, with a weighted average exercise price of €2.78 per share. Of these options, 200,000 expire on
January 18, 2023, 220,000 expire on April 26, 2026, 55,000 expire on April 25, 2027, 25,000 expire on August 29, 2028 and 40,000
expire on April 4, 2029.
Options to Purchase
or Subscribe for Securities
On June 24, 2010,
the shareholders authorized the Board of Directors to grant up to 229,100 options to purchase pre-existing shares at a fixed price
to be set by the Board of Directors. All of the shares that may be purchased through the exercise of stock options are currently
held as treasury stock.
On December 19,
2012, the shareholders authorized the Board of Directors to grant up to 500,000 options to subscribe to 500,000 new shares at
a fixed price to be set by the Board of Directors.
On February 18,
2016, the shareholders authorized the Board of Directors to grant up to 1,000,000 options to subscribe to 1,000,000 new shares
at a fixed price to be set by the Board of Directors.
On June 28, 2019, the shareholders authorized
the Board of Directors to grant up to a maximum of 358,528 options to purchase pre-existing shares at a fixed price to be set
by the Board of Directors. All of the shares that may be purchased through the exercise of stock options are currently held as
treasury stock. On June 28, 2019, the shareholders also authorized the Board of Directors to grant up to 1 million options to
subscribe to 1 million new shares at a fixed price to be set by the Board of Directors. No options were granted under these two
plans as of April 16, 2020.
As of April 16 2020,
we had sponsored four stock purchase and subscription option plans open to employees of EDAP TMS group.
On December 31,
2019, the expiration of our stock option contracts was as follows:
Date of expiration
|
|
Number of
Options
|
|
|
|
June 25, 2020
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
January 18, 2023
|
|
|
282,500
|
|
April 25, 2026
|
|
|
485,000
|
|
April 26, 2027
|
|
|
189,400
|
|
August 25, 2028
|
|
|
145,000
|
|
April 4, 2029
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
As of December 31,
2019, a summary of stock option activity to purchase or to subscribe to shares under these plans is as follows:
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
(€)
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
(€)
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
(€)
|
Outstanding on January 1,
|
|
|
1,347,600
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
|
|
|
1,207,600
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
|
|
|
1,427,438
|
|
|
|
2.94
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
|
|
3.90
|
|
|
|
165,000
|
|
|
|
2.65
|
|
|
|
260,000
|
|
|
|
2.39
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(143,700
|
)
|
|
|
2.16
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(60,000
|
)
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(85,000
|
)
|
|
|
1.94
|
|
|
|
(25,000
|
)
|
|
|
3.05
|
|
|
|
(134,750
|
)
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(285,088
|
)
|
|
|
3.99
|
|
Outstanding on December 31,
|
|
|
1,273,900
|
|
|
|
2.78
|
|
|
|
1,347,600
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
|
|
|
1,207,600
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
|
Exercisable on December 31,
|
|
|
818,900
|
|
|
|
2.60
|
|
|
|
772,600
|
|
|
|
2.44
|
|
|
|
598,850
|
|
|
|
2.29
|
|
Share purchase options available for grant on December 31
|
|
|
250,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following
table summarizes information about options to purchase existing shares held by the Company, or to subscribe to new Shares, as
of December 31, 2019:
|
|
Outstanding options
|
|
|
|
Fully vested options (1)
|
|
|
Exercise price (€)
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
life
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
(€)
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(2)
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
(€)
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(2)
|
3.90
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
3.90
|
|
|
|
5,954
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
3.22
|
|
|
485,000
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
3.22
|
|
|
|
352,013
|
|
|
|
363,750
|
|
|
|
3.22
|
|
|
|
264,010
|
|
2.65
|
|
|
145,000
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
2.65
|
|
|
|
187,891
|
|
|
|
36,250
|
|
|
|
2.65
|
|
|
|
46,973
|
|
2.39
|
|
|
189,400
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
2.39
|
|
|
|
294,669
|
|
|
|
94,400
|
|
|
|
2.39
|
|
|
|
146,868
|
|
2.38
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
|
|
|
65,764
|
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
|
|
|
65,764
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
282,500
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
575,114
|
|
|
|
282,500
|
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
575,114
|
|
1.91 to 3.90
|
|
|
1,273,900
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
2.78
|
|
|
|
1,481,405
|
|
|
|
818,900
|
|
|
|
2.60
|
|
|
|
1,098,728
|
|
(1)
|
Fully
vested options are all exercisable options
|
(2)
|
The
aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value, based on the
Company’s closing stock price of $4.43 at December 31, 2019, which would have been
received by the option holders had all in-the-money option holders exercised their options
as of that date.
|
Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related
Party Transactions
Major Shareholders
To our knowledge,
we are not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation, by any foreign government, or by any other natural
or legal person or persons acting severally or jointly.
To the best of our knowledge and on the basis of the notifications
received or filed with the SEC, there are no shareholders who have been or are beneficial owners of more than 5% of our shares
over the past three years and as of April 16, 2020, except for Opaleye Management Inc. which increased its holding in the Company
to 1,785,000 ADRs, representing 6.1% of our outstanding ADRs,
There are no arrangements
known to us, the operation of which may at a later date result in a change of control of the Company. All shares issued by the
Company have the same voting rights, except the treasury shares held by the Company, which have no voting rights.
As
of April 16, 2020, 29,433,994 shares were issued, including 29,141,566 outstanding and 292,428 treasury shares. At March 16, 2020,
there were 29,395,894 ADSs, each representing one Share, all of which were held of record by 20 registered holders in the United
States (including The Depository Trust Company).
Related Party Transactions
In 2019, EDAP Technomed
Co. Ltd. (Japan) contracted a loan amounting 80,000,000 JPY. As a current practice in Japan, this loan required a personal warranty
from the representative director, president and CEO of the subsidiary Mr. Jean-François Bachelard. EDAP TMS S.A., as the
mother company, counter-warranted this personal loan and agreed to indemnify Mr. Bachelard, in an indemnification letter dated
September 12, 2019.
In 2019, EDAP Technomed
Sdn Bdh (Malaysia) contracted with Maybank to establish a fixed deposit amounting 65,464.85 MYR. As a current practice in Malaysia,
any fixed deposit requires a personal warranty from the representative director, president and CEO of the subsidiary Mr. Hervé
de Soultrait. EDAP TMS S.A., as the mother company, counter-warranted this deposit and agreed to indemnify Mr. de Soultrait, in
an indemnification letter dated September 13, 2019.
In 2019, EDAP Technomed
Inc. contracted a car lease amounting $28,756.44. This lease required a personal warranty from the president of the subsidiary
Mr. Marc Oczachowski. EDAP TMS S.A., as the parent company, counter-warranted this personal lease warranty and agreed to indemnify
Mr. Marc Oczachowski, in an indemnification letter dated July 1, 2019.
Interests of Experts
and Counsel
Not applicable.
Item 8. Financial
Information
Consolidated Financial Statements
See Item 18, ‘‘Financial
Statements.’’
Export Sales
As of December
31, 2019, total consolidated export net sales, which we define as sales made outside of mainland France, were €33.5 million,
which represented 75% of total net sales.
As
part of our business, we are engaged in sales and marketing activities with hospitals, clinics, distributors or agents in countries
on a worldwide basis where we can provide our minimally invasive therapeutic solutions to patients with prostate cancer or urinary
stones. The following information complies with the sub-section “Disclosure of Certain Activities Relating to Iran”
of the Section 13 of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended: in 2015 we honored warranty contracts on previous sales
of lithotripsy devices to three Iranian public hospitals in order to provide the hospitals with the necessary disposables and
services to treat patients with kidney stones using our devices. As part of these warranty commitments, in 2017, 2018 and 2019
we did not invoice any medical equipment to the hospitals.
Legal Proceedings
From time to time,
we may become involved in legal proceedings or be subject to claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. Regardless
of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources
and other factors.
Dividends and Dividend
Policy
The payment and
amount of dividends depend on our earnings and financial condition and such other factors that our Board of Directors deems relevant.
Dividends are subject to recommendation by the Board of Directors and a vote by the shareholders at the shareholders’ ordinary
general meeting. Dividends, if any, would be paid in euro and, with respect to ADSs, would be converted at the then-prevailing
exchange rate into U.S. dollars. Holders of ADSs will be entitled to receive payments in respect of dividends on the underlying
shares in accordance with the Deposit Agreement.
No dividends were
paid with respect to fiscal years 2015 through 2018, and we do not anticipate paying any dividends for the foreseeable future.
Thereafter, any declaration of dividends on our shares as well as the amount and payment will be determined by majority vote of
the holders of our shares at an ordinary general meeting, following the recommendation of our Board of Directors. Such declaration
will depend upon, among other things, future earnings, if any, the operating and financial condition of our business, our capital
requirements, general business conditions and such other factors as our Board of Directors deems relevant in its recommendation
to shareholders.
Significant Changes as of April 16, 2020
On February 27,
2020, we decided to liquidate out Italian wholly-owned subsidiary EDAP Technomed Srl as the financial situation of the subsidiary
continued to record financial losses. Liquidation process is currently being rolled out. Sales, distribution and service activities
will be pursued through a dedicated distributor.
On March 25, 2020,
the Board of Directors accepted the resignation of Mr. Philippe Chauveau as Chairman of the Board and, upon the recommendation
of the Company’s Nomination Committee, the Board decided to combine the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer and elected Mr. Marc Oczachowski as the new Chairman of the Board of Directors.
The
novel COVID-19 virus which has profoundly impacted the whole worldwide economy early 2020 represents a new challenge for us all.
We are currently closely monitoring the situation and have implemented numerous precautions and protective measures to safeguard
our employees and to ensure an uninterrupted supply of our devices and disposables. In the near term, we expect this situation
to cause decreased activity in our recurring usual activity with some cancellations of ESWL and HIFU treatments, which may have
some impact on our recurring business. We also anticipate that device sales projects may be postponed on a near-term basis as
hospital purchase and investment decisions are put on hold. However, our sales cycles are long, and our current understanding
is that sale projects, currently in process, may be delayed but are expected to eventually be completed. It is possible that the
short-term impact might not affect the pipeline of projects nor the long-term momentum of market adoption of HIFU and its numerous
added value for patients including quality of life preservation. We have in inventory several devices and accessories that are
ready to be shipped, so the Company hopes to be well positioned to resume delivery activities as soon as that becomes possible.
Importantly, in this unique and unknown global crisis, EDAP has a solid cash position, which is expected to minimize disruption
to the extent possible.
Item 9. The Offer and Listing
Description of Securities
The shares are
traded solely in the form of ADSs, each ADS representing one ordinary share. Each ADS may be evidenced by an American Depositary
Receipt issued by The Bank of New York, our Depositary. The principal United States trading market for the ADSs, which is also
the principal trading market for the ADSs overall, is the NASDAQ Global Market of the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. (‘‘NASDAQ”),
on which the ADSs are quoted under the symbol ‘‘EDAP.’’
Item 10. Additional Information
Memorandum and Articles of Association
Set forth below
is a brief summary of significant provisions of our by-laws (or statuts) and applicable French laws. This is not a complete
description and is qualified in its entirety by reference to our by-laws, a translation of which is provided in Exhibit 1.1 to
this annual report. Each time they are modified, which can only occur with the approval of a two third majority of the shareholders
present or represented at a shareholders’ meeting, we file copies of our statuts with, and such by-laws are publicly
available from, the Registry of Commerce and Companies in Lyon, France, under number 316 488 204.
Our corporate affairs
are governed by our by-laws and by Book II of the French Commercial Code, as amended.
Our by-laws were
last updated on January 24, 2020 to reflect the latest increases in share capital related to the issuance of additional shares
following the exercise of warrants and options.
Corporate
Purposes
Pursuant to Article
2 of the by-laws, the corporate purpose of the Company is:
|
-
|
the
taking of financial interests, under whatever form, in all French or foreign groups,
companies or businesses which currently exist or which may be created in the future,
mainly through contribution, subscription or purchasing of stocks or shares, obligations
or other securities, mergers, holding companies, groups, alliances or partnerships;
|
|
-
|
the
management of such financial investments;
|
|
-
|
the
direction, management, control and coordination of its subsidiaries and interests;
|
|
-
|
the
provision of all administrative, financial, technical or other services; and
|
|
-
|
generally,
all transactions of whatever nature, whether financial, commercial, industrial, civil,
relating to property and/or real estate, which may be connected directly or indirectly,
in whole or in part, to the Company’s purposes or to any similar or related purposes
which may favor the extension or development of such purpose.
|
Board of Directors
The Board of Directors
is currently composed of five members, four of which were appointed by the shareholders for a period of six years expiring on
the date of the annual general shareholders’ meeting approving the accounts for fiscal year 2019. Mr. Marc Oczachowski,
Chief Executive Officer, and newly elected Chairman of the Board as of March 25, 2020, was appointed director of the Company by
the shareholders on June 30, 2017, effective July 1, 2017, for a period of six years expiring on the date of the annual general
shareholders’ meeting approving the accounts for the fiscal year 2022. See Item 6, ‘‘Directors, Senior Management
and Employees.’’ A director’s term ends at the end of the ordinary general shareholders” meeting convened
to vote on the accounts of the then-preceding fiscal year and held in the year during which the term of such director comes to
an end. Directors may be re-elected; a director may also be dismissed at any time at the shareholders’ meeting.
Each director must
own at least one share during his/her term of office. If, at the time of his/her appointment, a director does not own the required
number of shares or if during his/her term, he/she no longer owns the required number of shares, he/she will be considered to
have automatically resigned if he/she fails to comply with the shareholding requirement within three months.
An individual person
may not be a member of more than five Boards of Directors or Supervisory Boards in corporations (société anonyme)
registered in France; directorships held in controlled companies (as defined by Section L.233-16 of the French Commercial Code)
by the Company are not taken into account.
In the event of
the death or resignation of one or more directors, the Board of Directors may make provisional appointments to fill vacancies
before the next general shareholders’ meetings. These provisional appointments must be ratified by the next ordinary shareholders
meeting. Even if a provisional appointment is not ratified, resolutions and acts previously approved by the Board of Directors
nonetheless remain valid.
If the number of
Directors falls below the compulsory legal minimum, the remaining directors must immediately convene an ordinary general shareholders’
meeting to reach a full Board of Directors.
Any director appointed
in replacement of another director whose term has not expired remains in office only for the remaining duration of the term of
his predecessor.
One of our employees
may be appointed to serve as a director. His/her employment contract must include actual work obligations. In this case, he/she
does not lose the benefit of his/her employment contract.
The number of directors
that have employment contracts with the Company may not exceed one third of the directors then in office and in any case, a maximum
of five members.
Pursuant to our
by-laws, a director may not be over eighty-five years old. If a director reaches this age limit during his/her term, such director
is automatically considered to have resigned at the next general shareholders meeting.
A director cannot
borrow money from the Company.
The Board of Directors
determines the direction of our business and supervises its implementation. Within the limits set out by the corporate purposes
and the powers expressly granted by law to the general shareholders’ meeting, the Board of Directors may deliberate upon
our operations and make any decisions in accordance with our business. A director must abstain from voting on matters in which
the director has an interest. The resolutions passed in a meeting of the Board of Directors are valid only if a quorum of half
of the Directors is reached.
French law provides
that the functions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer in a French société anonyme may be
distinct and held by two separate individuals or combined. The choice between these two methods of management belongs to the Board
of Directors and must be made pursuant to our by-laws and applicable French law.
The Chairman
of the Board
The Board of Directors
must elect one of its members as Chairman of the Board of Directors, who must be an individual. The Board of Directors determines
the duration of the term of the Chairman, which cannot exceed that of his/her tenure as a director. The Board of Directors may
revoke the Chairman at any time. The Chairman’s compensation is determined by the Board of Directors, upon recommendation
of the Compensation Committee.
The Chairman represents
the Board of Directors and organizes its work. The Chairman reports on the Board’s behalf to the general shareholders’
meeting. The Chairman is responsible for ensuring the proper functioning of our governing bodies and that the Board members have
the means to perform their duties.
Pursuant to Section
706-43 of the French Criminal Proceedings Code, the Chairman may validly delegate to any person he/she chooses the power to represent
us in any criminal proceedings that we may face.
As with any other
director, the Chairman may not be over eighty-five years old. In case the Chairman reaches this age limit during his/her tenure,
he/she will automatically be considered to have resigned. However, his/her tenure is extended until the next Board of Directors
meeting, during which his/her successor will be appointed. Subject to the age limit provision, the Chairman of the Board may also
be re-elected.
The Chief
Executive Officer
We are managed
by the Chairman of the Board of Directors or by an individual elected by the Board of Directors bearing the title of Chief Executive
Officer. On March 31, 2007, the Board of Directors appointed Mr. Marc Oczachowski as Chief Executive Officer Officer and on March
25, 2020, the Board of Directors decided to combine the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and elected
Mr. Marc Oczachowski as the new Chairman of the Board of Directors.
The Chief Executive
Officer is vested with the powers to act under all circumstances on behalf of the Company, within the limits set out by the Company’s
corporate purposes, and subject to the powers expressly granted by the law to the Board of Directors and the general shareholders’
meeting.
The Chief Executive
Officer represents the Company with respect to third parties. The Company is bound by any acts of the Chief Executive Officer
even if they are contrary to corporate purposes, unless it is proven that the third party knew such act exceeded the Company’s
corporate purposes or could not ignore it in light of the circumstances. Publication of the by-laws alone is not sufficient evidence
of such knowledge.
The Chief Executive
Officer’s compensation is set by the Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee. The Chief Executive
Officer can be revoked at any time by the Board of Directors. If such termination is found to be unjustified, damages may be allocated
to the Chief Executive Officer, except when the Chief Executive Officer is also the Chairman of the Board.
The Chief Executive
Officer may not hold another position as Chief Executive Officer or member of a Supervisory Board in a corporation (société
anonyme) registered in France except when (a) such company is controlled (as referred to in Section L.233-16 of the French
Commercial Code) by the Company and (b) when this controlled company’s shares are not traded on a regulated market.
Pursuant to our
by-laws, the Chief Executive Officer may not be over seventy years old. In case the Chief Executive Officer reaches this age limit
during his/her office, he/she is automatically considered to have resigned. However, his/her tenure is extended until the next
Board of Directors meeting, during which his/her successor must be appointed.
Dividend and
Liquidation Rights (French Law)
Net income in
each fiscal year, increased or reduced, as the case may be, by any profit or loss of the Company carried forward from prior years,
less any contributions to legal reserves, is available for distribution to our shareholders as dividends, subject to the requirements
of French law and our by-laws.
Under French law,
we are required to allocate at least 5% of our unconsolidated net profits in each fiscal year to a legal reserve fund before dividends
may be paid with respect to that year. Such allocation is compulsory until the amount in such reserve fund is equal to 10% of
the nominal amount of the registered capital. The legal reserve is distributable only upon the liquidation of the Company.
Our shareholders
may, upon recommendation of the Board of Directors, decide to allocate all or a part of distributable profits, if any, among special
or general reserves, to carry them forward to the next fiscal year as retained earnings, or to allocate them to the shareholders
as dividends.
Our by-laws provide
that, if so agreed by the shareholders, reserves that are available for distribution under French law and our by-laws may be distributed
as dividends, subject to certain limitations.
If we have made
distributable profits since the end of the preceding fiscal year (as shown on an interim income statement certified by our statutory
auditors), the Board of Directors has the authority under French law, without the approval of shareholders, to distribute interim
dividends to the extent of such distributable profits. We have never paid interim dividends.
Under French law,
dividends are distributed to shareholders pro rata according to their respective shareholdings. Dividends are payable to holders
of shares outstanding on the date of the annual shareholders' meeting deciding the distribution of dividends, or in the case of
interim dividends, on the date of the Board of Directors meeting approving the distribution of interim dividends. However, holders
of newly issued shares may have their rights to dividends limited with respect to certain fiscal years. The actual dividend payment
date is decided by the shareholders in an ordinary general meeting or by the Board of Directors in the absence of such a decision
by the shareholders. The payment of the dividends must occur within nine months from the end of our fiscal year. Under French
law, dividends not claimed within five years of the date of payment revert to the French State.
If the Company is
liquidated, our assets remaining after payment of our debts, liquidation expenses and all of our remaining obligations will be
distributed first to repay in full the nominal value of the shares, then the surplus, if any, will be distributed pro rata among
the shareholders based on the nominal value of their shareholdings and subject to any special rights granted to holders of priority
shares, if any. Shareholders are liable for corporate liabilities only up to the par value of the shares they hold and are not
liable to further capital calls of the Company.
Changes in
Share Capital (French Law)
Our share capital
may be increased only with the approval of two thirds of the shareholders voting or represented at an extraordinary general meeting,
following a recommendation of the Board of Directors. Increases in the share capital may be effected either by the issuance of
additional shares (including the creation of a new class of shares) or by an increase in the nominal value of existing shares
or by the exercise of rights attached to securities giving access to the share capital. Additional Shares may be issued for cash
or for assets contributed in kind, upon the conversion of debt securities previously issued by the Company, by capitalization
of reserves, or, subject to certain conditions, by way of offset against indebtedness incurred by the Company. Dividends paid
in the form of shares may be distributed in lieu of payment of cash dividends, as described above under ‘‘—Dividend
and Liquidation Rights (French law).’’ French law permits different classes of shares to have liquidation, voting
and dividend rights different from those of the outstanding ordinary shares, although we only have one class of shares.
Our share capital
may be decreased only with the approval of two thirds of the shareholders voting or represented at an extraordinary general meeting.
The share capital may be reduced either by decreasing the nominal value of the shares or by reducing the number of outstanding
shares. The conditions under which the registered capital may be reduced will vary depending upon whether or not the reduction
is attributable to losses incurred by the Company. The number of outstanding shares may be reduced either by an exchange of shares
or by the repurchase and cancellation by the Company of its shares. Under French law, all the shareholders in each class of shares
must be treated equally unless the inequality in treatment is accepted by the affected shareholder. If the reduction is not attributable
to losses incurred by us, each shareholder will be offered an opportunity to participate in such capital reduction and may decide
whether or not to participate therein.
Repurchase
of Shares (French Law)
Pursuant to French
law, the Company may not acquire its own shares except (a) to reduce its share capital under certain circumstances with the approval
of the shareholders at an extraordinary general meeting or (b) to provide shares for distribution to employees under a profit
sharing or a stock option plan. However, the Company may not hold more than 10% of its shares then-issued. A subsidiary of the
Company is prohibited by French law from holding shares of the Company and, in the event it becomes a shareholder of the Company,
such shareholder must transfer all the shares of the Company that it holds.
Attendance
and Voting at Shareholders’ Meetings (French Law)
In accordance
with French law, there are two types of general shareholders’ meetings, ordinary and extraordinary. Ordinary general meetings
are required for matters such as the election of directors, the appointment of statutory auditors, the approval of the report
prepared by the Board of Directors, the annual accounts and the declaration of dividends.
Extraordinary general
meetings are required for approval of matters such as amendments to the Company’s by-laws, modification of shareholders’
rights, approval of mergers, increases or decreases in share capital (including a waiver of preferential subscription rights),
the creation of a new class of shares, the authorization of the issuance of investment certificates or securities convertible
or exchangeable into shares and for the sale or transfer of substantially all of the Company’s assets.
The Board of Directors
is required to convene an annual ordinary general shareholders’ meeting, which must be held within six months of the end
of our fiscal year, for approval of the annual accounts. Other ordinary or extraordinary meetings may be convened at any time
during the year. Shareholders’ meetings may be convened by the Board of Directors or, if the Board of Directors fails to
call such a meeting, by our statutory auditors or by a court-appointed agent. The court may be requested to appoint an agent either
by one or more shareholders holding at least 5% of the our registered capital or by an interested party under certain circumstances,
or, in case of an urgent matter, by the Work Council (Comité d’entreprise) representing the employees. The
notice calling a meeting must state the agenda for such meeting.
French law provides
that, at least 15 days before the date set for any general meeting on first notice, and at least ten days before the date set
for any general meeting on second notice, notice of the meeting (avis de convocation) must be sent by mail to all holders
of properly registered shares who have held such shares for more than one month before the date of the notice. A preliminary written
notice (avis de réunion) must be sent to each shareholder who has requested to be notified in writing. Under French
law, one or several shareholders together holding a specified percentage of shares may propose resolutions to be submitted for
approval by the shareholders at the meeting. Upon our request, the Bank of New York Mellon will send to holders of ADSs notices
of shareholders’ meetings and other reports and communications that are made generally available to shareholders. The Work
Council may also require the registration of resolution proposals on the agenda.
Attendance and exercise
of voting rights at ordinary and extraordinary general shareholders’ meetings are subject to certain conditions. Shareholders
deciding to exercise their voting rights must have their shares registered in their names in the shareholder registry maintained
by or on behalf of the Company before the meeting. An ADS holder must timely and properly return its voting instruction card to
the Depositary to exercise the voting rights relating to the shares represented by its ADSs. The Depositary will use its reasonable
efforts to vote the underlying shares in the manner indicated by the ADS holder. In addition, if an ADS holder does not timely
return a voting instruction card or the voting instruction card received is improperly completed or blank, that holder will be
deemed to have given the Depositary a proxy to vote, and the Depositary will vote in favor of all proposals recommended by the
Board of Directors and against all proposals that are not recommended by the Board of Directors.
All shareholders
who have properly registered their shares have the right to participate in general shareholders’ meetings, either in person,
by proxy, or by mail, and to vote according to the number of shares they hold. Each share confers on the shareholder the right
to one vote. Under French law, an entity we control directly or indirectly is prohibited from holding shares in the Company and,
in the event it becomes a shareholder, shares held by such entity would be deprived of voting rights. A proxy may be granted by
a shareholder whose name is registered on our share registry to his or her spouse, to another shareholder or to a legal representative,
in the case of a legal entity, or by sending a proxy in blank to the Company without nominating any representatives. In the latter
case, the Chairman of the shareholders’ meeting will vote such blank proxy in favor of all resolutions proposed by the Board
of Directors and against all others.
The presence in
person or by proxy of shareholders having not less than 20% (in the case of an ordinary general meeting or an extraordinary general
meeting deciding upon any capital increase by capitalization of reserves) or 25% (in the case of any other extraordinary general
meeting) of the shares entitled to vote is necessary to reach a quorum. If a quorum is not reached at any meeting, the meeting
is adjourned. Upon reconvening of an adjourned meeting, there is no quorum requirement in the case of an ordinary general meeting
or an extraordinary general meeting deciding upon any capital increase by capitalization of reserves. The presence in person or
by proxy of shareholders having not less than 20% of the shares is necessary to reach a quorum in the case of any other type of
extraordinary general meeting.
At an ordinary general
meeting or an extraordinary general meeting deciding upon any capital increase by capitalization of reserves, a simple majority
of the votes of the shareholders present or represented by proxy is required to approve a resolution. At any other extraordinary
general meeting, two-thirds of the votes cast is required. However, a unanimous vote is required to increase liabilities of shareholders.
As a result of a
recent change in French law, as of the General Meeting of Shareholders approving the 2019 accounts, abstention from voting, blank
votes and null votes by those present or those represented by proxy or voting by mail are no longer counted as votes against the
resolution submitted to a shareholder vote at any of the two types of meetings.
In addition to his/her
rights to certain information regarding the Company, any shareholder may, during the two-week period preceding a shareholders’
meeting, submit to the Board of Directors written questions relating to the agenda for the meeting. The Board of Directors must
respond to such questions during the meeting.
Under French law,
shareholders can nominate individuals for election to the Board of Directors at a shareholders’ meeting. When the nomination
is part of the agenda of the shareholders’ meeting, the nomination must contain the name, age, professional references and
professional activity of the nominee for the past five years, as well as the number of shares owned by such candidate, if any.
In addition, if the agenda for the shareholders’ meeting includes the election of members of the Board of Directors, any
shareholder may require, during the meeting, the nomination of a candidate for election at the Board of Directors at the shareholders’
meeting, even if such shareholder has not followed the nomination procedures. Under French law, shareholders cannot elect a new
member of the Board of Directors at a general shareholders meeting if the agenda for the meeting does not include the election
of a member of the Board of Directors, unless such nomination is necessary to fill a vacancy due to the previous resignation of
a member.
As set forth in
our by-laws, shareholders’ meetings are held at the registered office of the Company or at any other locations specified
in the written notice. We do not have staggered or cumulative voting arrangements for the election of Directors.
Preferential
Subscription Rights (French Law)
Shareholders have
preferential rights to subscribe for additional shares issued by the Company for cash on a pro rata basis (or any equity securities
of the Company or other securities giving a right, directly or indirectly, to equity securities issued by the Company). Shareholders
may waive their preferential rights, either individually or at an extraordinary general meeting under certain circumstances. Preferential
subscription rights, if not previously waived, are transferable during the subscription period relating to a particular offering
of shares. U.S. holders of ADSs may not be able to exercise preferential rights for Shares underlying their ADSs unless a registration
statement under the Securities Act is effective with respect to such rights or an exemption from the registration requirement
thereunder is available.
Form and Holding
of Shares (French Law)
Form of Shares
Our by-laws provide that shares
can only be held in registered form.
Holding of Shares
The shares are registered
in the name of the respective owners thereof in the registry maintained by or on behalf of the Company.
Stock certificates
evidencing shares, in a manner comparable to that in the United States, are not issued by French companies, but we may issue or
cause to be issued confirmations of shareholdings registered in such registry to the persons in whose names the shares are registered.
Pursuant to French law, such confirmations do not constitute documents of title and are not negotiable instruments.
Ownership
of ADSs or Shares by Non-French Residents (French Law)
Under current
French law, there is no limitation on the right of non-French residents or non-French security holders to own, or where applicable,
vote securities of a French company. A non-resident of France must file a déclaration administrative, or administrative
notice, with French authorities in connection with the acquisition of a controlling interest in any French company. Under existing
administrative rulings, ownership, by a non-resident of France or a French corporation which is itself controlled by a foreign
national, of 33.33% or more of a company’s share capital or voting rights is regarded as a controlling interest, but a lower
percentage may be held to be a controlling interest in certain circumstances (depending upon such factors as the acquiring party’s
intentions, its ability to elect directors or financial reliance by the French company on the acquiring party).
Also, certain
foreign investments in companies incorporated under French laws are subject to the prior authorization from the French Minister
of the Economy, where all or part of the target’s business and activity relate to a strategic sector, such as energy, transportation,
public health, telecommunications, etc.
Certain
Exemptions (French Law)
Under the U.S.
securities laws, as a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from certain rules that apply to domestic U.S. issuers with equity
securities registered under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including the proxy solicitation rules and the rules requiring
disclosure of share ownership by directors, officers and certain shareholders. We are also exempt from certain of the current
NASDAQ corporate governance requirements. For more information on these exemptions, see Item 16 G, ‘‘Corporate Governance
—Exemptions from Certain NASDAQ Corporate Governance Rules.’’
Enforceability
of Civil Liabilities (French Law)
We are a société
anonyme, or limited liability corporation, organized under the laws of the Republic of France. The majority of our directors
and executive officers reside in the Republic of France. All or a substantial portion of our assets and the assets of such persons
are located outside the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for investors to effect service of process within the
United States upon such persons or to enforce, either inside or outside the United States, judgments against such persons obtained
in U.S. courts or to enforce in U.S. court judgments obtained against such persons in courts in jurisdictions outside the United
States, in each case, in any action predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United
States. In an original action brought in France predicated solely upon the U.S. federal securities laws, French courts may not
have the requisite jurisdiction to grant the remedies sought, and actions for enforcement in France of judgments of U.S. courts
rendered against French persons referred to in the second sentence of this paragraph would require such French persons to waive
their right under Article 15 of the French Civil Code to be sued in France only. We believe that no such French persons have waived
such right with respect to actions predicated solely upon U.S. federal securities laws. In addition, actions in the United States
under the U.S. federal securities laws could be affected under certain circumstances by the French law of July 16, 1980, which
may preclude or restrict obtaining evidence in France or from French persons in connection with such actions.
Material Contracts
None.
Exchange Controls
Under current
French foreign exchange control regulations, there are no limitations on the amount of cash payments that we may remit to residents
of foreign countries. Laws and regulations concerning foreign exchange controls do require, however, that all payments or transfers
of funds made by a French resident to a non-resident be handled by an accredited intermediary.
Certain Income Tax Considerations
The following generally
summarizes the material French and U.S. tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of shares or ADS (the “Securities”).
The statements set forth below are based on the applicable laws, treaties and administrative interpretations of France and the
United States as of the date hereof, all of which are subject to change.
This discussion
is intended only as a descriptive summary and does not purport to be a complete analysis or listing of all potential tax effects
of the purchase, ownership or disposition of Securities. It does not constitute legal or tax advice.
Investors should
consult their own tax advisors regarding the tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of Securities in light
of their particular circumstances, including especially the laws of all jurisdictions in which they are resident for tax purposes.
French Taxation
The following summary
of the French tax consequences of purchasing and disposing of Securities does not address the treatment of Securities that are
held by a resident of France (except for purposes of describing related tax consequences for other holders) or in connection with
a permanent establishment or fixed base through which a holder carries on business or performs personal services in France, or
by a person that owns, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of the stock of the Company. Moreover, the following discussion of the
tax treatment of dividends only deals with distributions made on or after January 1, 2020.
There are currently
no procedures available for holders that are not U.S. residents to claim tax treaty benefits in respect of dividends received
on Securities registered in the name of a nominee. Such holders should consult their own tax advisors about the consequences of
owning and disposing of Securities.
French law provides
for specific rules relating to trusts, in particular specific tax and filing requirements as well as modifications to wealth,
estate and gift taxes as they apply to trusts. Given the complex nature of these rules and the fact that their application varies
depending on the status of the trust, the grantor, the beneficiary and the assets held in the trust, the following summary does
not address the tax treatment of Securities held in a trust. If Securities are held in trust, the grantor, trustee and beneficiary
are urged to consult their own tax adviser regarding the specific tax consequences of acquiring, owning and disposing of Securities.
Taxation of Dividends
on Securities - Withholding Tax
Dividends paid by
a French corporation, such as EDAP, to non-residents normally are subject to a 30% French withholding tax (reduced to 12.8% when
non-residents are individuals and 15% for distributions made to not-for-profit organizations with a head office in a Member State
of the European Economic Area which would be subject to the tax regime set forth under article 206-5 of the French Tax Code, or
FTC, if their head office was located in France and which meet the criteria set forth in the administrative guidelines BOI-RPPM-RCM-30-30-10-70-20191224,
n°130).
Dividends paid by
a French corporation transferred to non-cooperative States or territories (Etat ou territoire non coopératif), within
the meaning of Article 238-0 A of the FTC (a “Non-Cooperative State”), will be subject to French withholding tax at
a rate of 75% irrespective of the tax residence of the beneficiary of the dividends, if the dividends are received in such States
or territories (subject to certain exceptions and the more favorable provisions of an applicable double tax treaty, provided that
the double tax treaty is found to apply and the relevant conditions are fulfilled). The list of Non-Cooperative States is published
by ministerial executive order, which is updated from time to time. However, non-resident holders that are entitled to and comply
with the procedures for claiming benefits under an applicable tax treaty may be subject to a reduced rate (generally 15%) of French
withholding tax. If a non-resident holder establishes its entitlement to treaty benefits prior to the payment of a dividend, then
French tax generally will be withheld at the reduced rate provided under the treaty.
Taxation on Sale
or Disposition of Securities
Generally, holders
who are not residents of France for tax purposes, will not be subject to any French income tax or capital gains tax upon the sale
or the disposal of Securities provided such holders have not held more than 25% of EDAP dividend rights, known as (“droits
aux bénéfices sociaux”), at any time during the preceding five years, either directly or indirectly, and,
as relates to individuals, alone or with relatives (as an exception holders who are established or incorporated in a Non-Cooperative
State are subject to a 75% withholding tax in France on any such capital gain, regardless of the fraction of the dividend rights
they hold).
If the holders are
resident in a State with which France has signed a double tax treaty that contains more favorable provisions, the holders may
be exempt from any French income or capital gains tax when they sell or dispose of any Securities even if one of the above statements
applies to them.
Pursuant to Article
235 ter ZD of the FTC, purchases of certain securities issued by a French company, including ordinary shares and ADSs, which are
listed on a regulated market of the EU or an exchange market formally acknowledged by the AMF (in each case within the meaning
of the French Monetary and Financial Code, or the FMFC) are subject in France to a 0.3% tax on financial transactions, or the
TFT, provided inter alia that the issuer’s market capitalization exceeds €1.0 billion as of December 1 of the
year preceding the taxation year.
A list of companies
whose market capitalization exceeds €1.0 billion as of December 1 of the year preceding the taxation year within the meaning
of Article 235 ter ZD of the FTC has been published by the French tax authorities in its official guidelines on December 18, 2019
(BOI-ANNX-000467-20191218). EDAP was not included in such list as its market capitalization did not exceed €1.0 billion as
at December 1, 2019. Please note that such list may be updated from time to time, or may not be published anymore in the future.
Furthermore, NASDAQ is not currently acknowledged by the French AMF, but this may change in the future. Therefore, purchases of
the Securities are not subject to the TFT.
In the case where
the TFT is not applicable, transfers of shares issued by a French company which are not listed on a regulated or organized market
within the meaning of the FMFC are subject to uncapped registration duties at the rate of 0.1% notwithstanding the existence of
a written statement (acte). Although the official guidelines published by the French tax authorities are silent on this
point, ADSs should remain outside of the scope of the aforementioned 0.1% registration duties.
Estate and Gift
Tax
France imposes estate
and gift tax on Securities of a French company that are acquired by inheritance or gift. The tax applies without regard to the
tax residence of the transferor. However, France has entered into estate and gift tax treaties with a number of countries pursuant
to which, assuming certain conditions are met, residents of the treaty country may be exempted from such tax or obtain a tax credit.
Wealth Tax
The French Wealth
tax (“impôt de solidarité sur la fortune”) has been replaced with a French real estate wealth
tax (“impôt sur la fortune immobilière”) with effect from January 1, 2018. Individuals who are
not residents of France for purposes of French taxation are not subject to a real estate wealth tax in France as a result of owning
an interest in the share capital of a French corporation, provided that such individuals do not own directly or indirectly a shareholding
exceeding 10% of the financial rights and voting rights of the corporation. Double taxation treaties may provide for a more favorable
tax treatment.
Taxation of U.S. Holders
Shares
The following is
a summary of the material French and U.S. federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of Securities
by a U.S. holder (as defined above). It deals principally with U.S. holders that are residents of the United States for purposes
of the Convention between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the French Republic for the Avoidance
of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and Capital of August 31, 1994, (the “Treaty”),
which entered into force on December 30, 1995 (as amended by the protocol described below and any subsequent protocols), and the
tax regulations issued by the French tax authorities, and are fully eligible for benefits under the Treaty.
This summary does
not deal with Securities that are not held as capital assets, and does not address the tax treatment of holders of ADSs that acquire
them in “pre-release” transactions or holders that are subject to special rules, such as banks, insurance companies,
dealers in securities or currencies, regulated investment companies, persons that elect mark-to-market treatment, persons holding
Securities as a position in a synthetic security, straddle or conversion transaction, persons that own, directly or indirectly,
5% or more of our voting stock or 5% or more of our outstanding capital and persons whose functional currency is not the U.S.
dollar.
This summary does
not discuss the treatment of Securities that are held in connection with a permanent establishment or fixed base through which
a holder carries on business or performs personal services in France. The summary is based on laws, treaties, regulatory interpretations
and judicial decisions in effect on the date hereof, all of which are subject to change. Such changes could apply retroactively
and could affect the consequences described below.
In particular, the
United States and France signed a protocol on January 13, 2009, that entered into force on December 23, 2009 and made several
significant changes to the Treaty, including changes to the “Limitation of Benefits” provision. U.S. holders are advised
to consult their own tax advisors regarding the effect the protocol may have on their eligibility for Treaty benefits in light
of their own particular circumstances.
A “U.S. holder”
includes (1) a citizen or individual resident of the United States; (2) a corporation or other entity taxable as a corporation
created or organized in the United States or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia;
(3) an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source; and (4) a trust (i) whose administration
is subject to the primary supervision of a U.S. court and which has one or more “U.S. persons” who have the authority
to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (ii) which has made an election under applicable Treasury regulations to
be treated as a U.S. person.
A U.S. holder generally
will be entitled to Treaty benefits in respect of Securities if he is concurrently: (1) the beneficial owner of Securities (and
the dividends paid with respect thereto); (2) an individual resident of the United States, a U.S. corporation, or a partnership,
estate or trust to the extent its income is subject to taxation in the United States in its hands or in the hands of its partners
or beneficiaries; (3) not also a resident of France for French tax purposes; and (4) not subject to an anti-treaty shopping article
that applies in limited circumstances.
Special rules apply
to pension funds and certain other tax-exempt investors.
If a partnership
holds Securities, the tax treatment of a partner generally will depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the
partnership. If a U.S. holder is a partner in a partnership that holds Securities, the holder is urged to consult its own tax
advisor regarding the specific tax consequences of owning and disposing of its Securities.
For U.S. federal
income tax purposes, a U.S. holder’s ownership of our ADSs will be treated as ownership of our underlying ordinary shares.
Holders should
consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of Securities in
light of their particular circumstances, including the effect of any state or local laws.
Dividends and
Paying Agents
Generally, dividend
distributions to non-residents of France are subject to French withholding tax at a 28% rate (reduced to 12.8% when non-residents
are individuals or to 75% if paid in a Non-Cooperative State, regardless of the tax residence of the beneficiary of the dividends
if the dividends are received in such Non-Cooperative State). Eligible U.S. holders providing evidence of the entitlement to Treaty
benefits with respect to the dividend (article 30) under the ‘‘Limitation on Benefits’’ provision contained
in the Treaty who are U.S. residents, as defined pursuant to the provisions of the Treaty, will not be subject to this 28% or
75% withholding tax rate, but may be subject to the withholding tax at a reduced rate (as described below).
Under the Treaty,
the rate of French withholding tax on dividends paid to an eligible U.S. holder as defined pursuant to the provisions of the Treaty
and whose ownership of Securities is not effectively connected with a permanent establishment or fixed base that such U.S. holder
has in France is reduced to 15%, or to 5% if such U.S. holder is a corporation and owns directly or indirectly at least 10% of
the share capital of the issuing company; such U.S. holder may claim a refund from the French tax authorities of the amount withheld
in excess of the Treaty rates of 15% or 5%, if any. For U.S. holders that are not individuals, the requirements for eligibility
for Treaty benefits, including the reduced 5% or 15% withholding tax rate, contained in the “Limitation on Benefits”
provision of the Treaty are complicated, and certain technical changes were made to these requirements. U.S. holders are advised to consult their own tax advisers regarding their eligibility for Treaty benefits in light
of their own particular circumstances.
French withholding
tax will be withheld at the domestic rates mentioned above or the 5% or 15% Treaty rate if a U.S. holder has established before
the date of payment that the holder is a resident of the United States under the Treaty by following the simplified procedure
described below.
The gross amount
of dividends that a U.S. holder receives (before the deduction of French withholding tax) generally will be subject to U.S. federal
income taxation as ordinary dividend income to the extent paid or deemed paid out of the current or accumulated earnings and profits
of the Company (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). Such dividends will not be eligible for the dividends
that received deduction generally allowed to U.S. corporations. To the extent that an amount received by a U.S. holder exceeds
the allocable share of current and accumulated earnings and profits of the Company, such excess will be applied first to reduce
such U.S. holder’s tax basis in its Securities and then, to the extent it exceeds the U.S. holder’s tax basis, it
will constitute capital gain from a deemed sale or exchange of such Securities. As the Company does not maintain “earnings
and profits” computations, holders should assume that all distributions constitute dividends.
Subject to certain
exceptions for short-term and hedged positions, the U.S. dollar amount of dividends received by an individual with respect to
the Securities is currently subject to taxation at a maximum rate of 20% if the dividends are “qualified dividends.”
Dividends paid on the Securities will be treated as qualified dividends if (i) the issuer is eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive
income tax treaty with the United States that the IRS has approved for the purposes of the qualified dividend rules and (ii) the
Company was not, in the year prior to the year in which the dividend was paid, and is not, in the year in which the dividend is
paid, a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC. The Treaty has been approved for the purposes of the qualified dividend rules.
Based on our audited financial statements and relevant market and shareholder data, we do not believe we were a PFIC for U.S.
federal income tax purposes with respect to our 2019 taxable year. In addition, we do not anticipate it becoming a PFIC for the
2020 taxable year (as described under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules” below). Accordingly, dividends,
if any, paid by us in 2019 to a U.S. holder would constitute “qualified dividends.”
Holders of Securities
should consult their own tax advisers regarding the availability of the reduced dividend tax rate in light of their own particular
circumstances.
Dividends distributed
with respect to the Securities generally will be treated as dividend income from sources outside of the United States, and generally
will be treated as “passive category” (or, in the case of certain U.S. holders, “general category”) income
for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Subject to certain limitations, French income tax withheld in connection with any distribution
with respect to the Securities may be claimed as a credit against the U.S. federal income tax liability of a U.S. holder if such
U.S. holder elects for that year to credit all foreign income taxes. Alternatively, such French withholding tax may be taken as
a deduction against taxable income. Foreign tax credits will not be allowed for withholding taxes imposed in respect of certain
short-term or hedged positions in securities and may not be allowed in respect of certain arrangements in which a U.S. holder’s
expected economic profit is insubstantial. U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors concerning the implications of these
rules in light of their particular circumstances.
Dividends paid in
euro will be included in the income of a U.S. holder in a U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect
on the date of receipt by the holder (or, in the case of the ADSs, by the Depositary), regardless of whether the payment is in
fact converted into U.S. dollars. If such a dividend is converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. holder generally
should not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the dividend income.
Capital Gains
Under the Treaty,
a U.S. holder will not be subject to French tax on any gain derived from the sale or exchange of Securities, unless the gain is
effectively connected with a permanent establishment or fixed base maintained by the holder in France.
For U.S. federal
income tax purposes, gain or loss realized by a U.S. holder on the sale or other disposition of Securities will be capital gain
or loss, and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the Securities were held for more than one year. The net amount of long-term
capital gain recognized by an individual U.S. holder generally is currently subject to taxation at a maximum rate of 20%. U.S.
holders’ ability to offset capital losses against ordinary income is limited.
Additional Issues For U.S. Holders
Procedures
for Claiming Treaty Benefits
Pursuant to the
official guidelines published by the French tax authorities (BOI-INT-DG-20-20-20-20-20120912), U.S. holders can either claim Treaty
benefits under a simplified procedure or under the normal procedure. The procedure to be followed depends on whether the application
for Treaty benefits is filed before or after the dividend payment.
Under the simplified
procedure, in order to benefit from the lower rate of withholding tax applicable under the Treaty before the payment of the dividend,
a U.S. holder must complete and deliver to the paying agent (through its account holder) a treaty form (Form 5000), to certify
in particular that:
|
-
|
the
U.S. holder is beneficially entitled to the dividend;
|
|
-
|
the U.S.
holder is a U.S. resident within the meaning of the Treaty;
|
|
-
|
the dividend
is not derived from a permanent establishment or a fixed base that the U.S. holder has
in France; and
|
|
-
|
the dividend
received is or will be reported to the tax authorities in the United States.
|
For partnerships
or trusts, claims for Treaty benefits and related attestations are made by the partners, beneficiaries or grantors who also have
to supply certain additional documentation.
In order to be eligible
for Treaty benefits, pension funds and certain other tax-exemptions, U.S. holders must comply with the simplified procedure described
above, though they may be required to supply additional documentation evidencing their entitlement to those benefits.
If Form 5000 is
not filed prior to the dividend payment, a withholding tax will be levied at the 28% rate, and a holder would have to claim a
refund for the excess under the normal procedure by filing both Form 5000 and Form 5001 no later than December 31 of the second
calendar year following the year in which the dividend is paid.
Pension funds and
certain other tax-exempt entities are subject to the same general filing requirements as other U.S. holders except that they may
have to supply additional documentation evidencing their entitlement to these benefits.
Copies of Form 5000
and Form 5001 may be downloaded from the French tax authorities’ website (www.impots.gouv.fr) and are also available from
the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and from the Centre des Impôts des Non-Résidents in France (10 rue du Centre
93160, Noisy-le-Grand).
Medicare Tax
Certain U.S. holders
that are individuals, estates or trusts are required to pay an additional 3.8% tax on, among other things, dividends on and capital
gains from the sale or other disposition of stock. U.S. holders that are individuals, estates or trusts should consult their tax
advisors regarding the effect of this legislation on their ownership and disposition of the Securities.
Passive Foreign
Investment Company Rules
Unfavorable U.S.
tax rules such as the PFIC rules, apply to companies that are considered PFICs. The Company will be classified as a PFIC in a
particular taxable year if either (a) 75% or more of its gross income is treated as passive income for purposes of the PFIC rules;
or (b) the average percentage of the value of its assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income is at least
50%.
As explained above, the Company believes that
it was not a PFIC for U.S. tax purposes with respect to the year 2019, and also does not anticipate becoming a PFIC with respect
to the year 2020. However, as discussed in our Annual Report on Form 20-Fs filed by the Company with respect to certain prior
years the Company believes that it was a PFIC in the past. Moreover, because the PFIC determination is made annually and is dependent
upon a number of factors, some of which are beyond the Company's control (including whether the Company continues to earn substantial
amounts of operating income as well as the market composition and value of the Company's assets), there can be no assurance that
the Company will not become a PFIC in future years.
U.S. holders that
held Securities at any time during the years when the Company was a PFIC and did not make certain U.S. tax elections (a "mark-to-market
election" or a "QEF election") will be subject to adverse tax treatment. For instance, such holders will be subject
to a special tax at ordinary income tax rates on certain dividends that the Company pays and on gains realized on the sale of
Securities (“excess distributions”) in all subsequent years, even though the Company ceased to qualify as a PFIC.
The amount of this tax will be increased by an interest charge to compensate for tax deferral, calculated as if the excess distributions
had been earned ratably over the period the U.S. holder held its Securities. It may be possible, in certain circumstances, for
a holder to avoid the application of the PFIC rules by making a "deemed sale" election for its taxable year that includes
the last day of the Company’s last taxable year during which it qualified as a PFIC. The PFIC rules are extremely complex,
and holders should consult their own tax advisers regarding the possible application of the PFIC rules to their Securities and
the desirability and availability of the above elections.
French
Estate and Gift Tax
Under the estate
and gift tax convention between the United States and France dated November 24, 1978 (as amended by the protocol signed on December
8, 2004), a transfer of Securities by gift or by reason of the death of a U.S. holder entitled to benefits under that convention
generally will not be subject to French gift or inheritance tax, so long as the donor or transferor was not domiciled in France
at the time of the transfer, and Securities were not used or held for use in the conduct of a business or profession through a
permanent establishment or fixed base in France.
French Real Estate
Wealth Tax
The French real
estate wealth tax (“impôt sur la fortune immobilière”), which replaced the French wealth tax (“impôt
de solidarité sur la fortune”) with effect from January 1, 2018, does not generally apply to Securities of a
U.S. holder if the holder is a resident of the United States for purposes of the Treaty and does not own directly or indirectly
a shareholding exceeding 10% of the financial rights and voting rights of EDAP.
U.S. Information Reporting and Backup
Withholding Rules
Payments of dividends
and sales proceeds that are made within the United States or through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries are subject
to information reporting and may be subject to backup withholding unless the holder (i) is a corporation or other exempt recipient
or (ii) provides a taxpayer identification number and certifies that no loss of exemption from backup withholding has occurred.
Holders that are not U.S. persons generally are not subject to information reporting or backup withholding. However, such a holder
may be required to provide a certification of its non-U.S. status in connection with payments received within the United States
or through a U.S.-related financial intermediary.
Information with
Respect to Foreign Financial Assets
In addition, U.S.
holders that are individuals (and, to the extent provided in future regulations, entities) are subject to reporting obligations
with respect to the shares, securities, debt instruments and other obligations of a French corporation if the aggregate value
of such assets and certain other “specified foreign financial assets” exceeds $50,000. Significant penalties can apply
if a U.S. holder fails to disclose its specified foreign financial assets.
U.S. holders should
also consider their possible obligation to file online a FinCEN Form 114 Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts Report as a result
of holding the Securities. U.S. holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding these and any other reporting requirements
that may apply with respect to their Securities.
The discussion
above is a general summary. It does not cover all tax matters that may be important to you. You should consult your tax advisors
regarding the application of the U.S. federal tax rules to your particular circumstances, as well as the state, local, non-U.S.
and other tax consequences to you of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the Securities.
Statement by Experts
Not applicable.
Documents on Display
We file annual,
periodic, and other reports and information with the SEC. These materials, including this annual report and the exhibits hereto,
may be inspected and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public
may obtain information on the operation of the SEC’s Public Reference Room by calling the SEC in the United States at +1
800 SEC 0330. Certain of our public filings are also available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov (such documents
are not incorporated by reference in this annual report).
Subsidiary Information
Not applicable.
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed
to market risk from changes in both foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. We do not hold or issue derivative or
other financial instruments. During 2019 and as of December 31, 2019, we had no outstanding foreign exchange sale or purchase
contracts.
Exchange Rate Risk
Revenues and
Expenses in Foreign Currencies
We are exposed
to foreign currency exchange rate risk because a significant portion of our costs are denominated in currencies other than those
in which we earn revenues. In 2019, approximately 74% of our total costs of sales and operating expenses were denominated in euro.
During the same period, approximately 49% of our net sales were denominated in euro, the rest being denominated primarily in U.S.
dollars and Japanese yen.
A uniform 10% strengthening in the value of the euro as of December
31, 2019 relative to the U.S. dollar and the Japanese yen would have resulted in an decrease in income before taxes of approximately
€67,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to an increase of approximately €60,000 for the year ended December
31, 2018. A uniform 10% decrease in the value of the euro as of December 31, 2019 relative to the U.S. dollar and the Japanese
yen would have resulted in an increase in income before taxes of approximately €73,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019
as compared to an increase of approximately €66,511 for the year ended December 31, 2018. This calculation assumes that the
U.S. dollar and Japanese yen exchange rates would have changed in the same direction relative to the euro. In addition to the direct
effect of changes in exchange rates quantified above, changes in exchange rates also affect the volume of sales.
We regularly assess
the exposure of our receivables to fluctuations in the exchange rates of the principal foreign currencies in which our sales are
denominated (in particular, the U.S. dollar and the Japanese yen) and, from time to time, hedge such exposure by entering into
forward sale contracts for the amounts denominated in such currencies that we expect to receive from our local subsidiaries. As
of December 31, 2019, we had no outstanding hedging instruments.
Financial Instruments
and Indebtedness
Over the past
three years, we also had exchange rate exposures with respect to indebtedness and assets denominated in Japanese yen and U.S.
dollars. Approximately €0.6 million, €0.6 million and €40 thousand of our outstanding indebtedness at December
31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, were denominated in Japanese yen. Approximately €0 million, €0 million and €0.8
million of our outstanding indebtedness at December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, were denominated in U.S. dollars. In
addition, we had approximately €4.0 million, €1.3 million and €2.1 million of cash denominated in U.S. dollars
at December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and €1.3 million, €3.7 million and €3.9 million of cash denominated
in Japanese yen at December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Equity Price Risk
Not applicable.
Item 12. Description of Securities
Other than Equity Securities
American Depositary Shares
Fees Payable
to ADS Holders
The Bank of New
York Mellon, as the Company’s Depositary, currently collects its fees for the delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from
investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries acting for them.
The Depositary may
collect fees for making distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion
of distributable property to pay the fees. The Depositary may collect its annual fee for Depositary services by deductions from
cash distributions or by directly billing investors or by charging the book-entry system accounts of participants acting for them.
The Depositary may generally refuse to provide fee-attracting services until the fees for those services are paid.
Fees:
|
For:
|
$5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100
ADSs)
|
-
Issuance of ADSs, including issuances resulting from a distribution of shares or rights or other property,
- Cancellation
of ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, including if the deposit agreement terminates.
|
$0.2 (or less) per ADS
|
-
Any cash distribution to ADS registered holders.
|
A fee equivalent to the fee that would be payable
if securities distributed to you had been shares and the shares had been deposited to issuance of ADSs
|
-
Distribution of securities distributed to holders of deposited securities which are distributed by the Depositary to ADS
registered holders.
|
Registration or transfer fees
|
-
Transfer and registration of shares on our share register to or from the name of the Depositary or its agent when
you deposit or withdraw shares
|
Expenses of the Depositary
|
-
Cable, telex and facsimile transmissions (when expressly provided in the deposit agreement)
-
Converting foreign currency to U.S. dollars
|
Taxes and other governmental charges the Depositary
or the custodian have to pay on any ADS or share underlying an ADS, for example, stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding
taxes
|
- As necessary
|
Any charges incurred by the Depositary or its agents
for servicing the deposited securities
|
- As necessary
|
Fees Payable
to the Company by the Depositary
From January 1,
2019 to March 15, 2020, the following amounts were paid by the Depositary to the Company: $90,000 and $10,491 respectively for
the administration of the ADR program and for expenses linked to the assistance in identifying shareholders of the Company.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
1— SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
1-1 Nature of operations
EDAP TMS S.A. and its subsidiaries (‘‘the
Company’’) are engaged in the development, production, marketing, distribution and maintenance of a portfolio of minimally-invasive
medical devices for the treatment of urological diseases. The Company currently produces innovative robotic devices for treating
stones of the urinary tract and localized prostate cancer. We also derive revenues from the distribution of urodynamics products
and urology lasers. Net sales consist primarily of direct sales to hospitals and clinics in France and Europe, export sales to
third-party distributors and agents, and export sales through subsidiaries based in Germany, Italy, the United States and Asia.
Moreover, the Company develops a novel HIFU
treatment for liver cancer in cooperation with its long-term academic partner INSERM and leading cancer centers (the “HECAM”
project).
The Company purchases the majority of the components
used in its products from a number of suppliers but for some components, relies on a single source. Delay would be caused if the
supply of these components or other components was interrupted and these delays could be extended in certain situations where a
component substitution may require regulatory approval. Failure to obtain adequate supplies of these components in a timely manner
could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position and results of operations.
1-2 Basis of preparation
These consolidated financial statements have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP).
With the exception of the change in the Company’s
accounting policies for leases as a result of the adoption of ASC 842, Leases as from January 1, 2019, there has been no changes
to the accounting policies for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, that are of significance, or potential significance,
to the Company.
1-3 Management estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (‘‘U.S. GAAP’’) requires management to make estimates
and assumptions, such as business plans, stock price volatility, duration of standard warranty per market, duration and interest
rate of operating leases, price of maintenance contract used to determine the amount of revenue to be deferred and life duration
of our range of products. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
1-4 Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of EDAP TMS S.A. and all its domestic and foreign owned subsidiaries after elimination of intercompany balances and transactions.
We do not have any significant interests in any variable interest entities.
1-5 Revenue recognition
The Company adopted ASC Topic 606, Revenue
from Contracts with Customers, on January 1, 2018.
The Company’s revenue consists of:
- Sales of goods (devices and consumables),
where invoicing takes place upon delivery.
- Revenue-per-Procedures (“RPP”)
and leases: they comprise (i) revenues on a per treatment basis which are invoiced after each treatment, or in advance, or on a
periodic basis, (ii) leases of devices, which are generally invoiced on a monthly or quarterly basis, and (iii) lease components
arising from multiple-element arrangements, where specific sales terms are negotiated in accordance with each customer’s
individual requirements and which are generally invoiced based on contract terms,
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
- Sales of spare parts and services (maintenance,
upgrades, mobility and others). Spare parts are invoiced when delivered. Regarding services, invoicing is performed either on a
subscription basis (in advance or at the end of the period) or when performed.
Sales of our medical devices and sales of disposables,
sales of RPPs and leases, and sales of spare parts and services, are all net of commissions.
The Company invoices its customers based on the billing schedules
in its sales arrangements. Payments are generally due between one to three months from date of invoice.
The Company accounts for a contract with a customer
when there is a legally enforceable contract between the Company and its customer, the rights of the goods or services and their
payment terms can be identified, the contract has commercial substance, collectability of the contract consideration is probable,
it is approved and the parties are committed to their obligations.
Our sale arrangements may contain multiple elements,
including device(s), consumables and services. For these multiple-element arrangements, the Company accounts for individual goods
and services as separate performance obligations: (i) if they are a distinct good or service that is separately identifiable from
other items in the multiple-element arrangement; and (ii) if a customer can benefit from the good or service on its own or with
other resources that are readily available to the customer. The Company’s sale arrangements may include a combination
of the following performance obligations: device(s), consumables, leases and services (such as, but not limited to, warranty extension).
For multiple-element arrangements, revenue
is allocated to each performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price. Standalone selling prices are based
on observable prices at which the Company separately sells the goods or services. If a standalone selling price is not directly
observable, then the Company estimates the standalone selling price considering market conditions and entity-specific factors including,
but not limited to, features and functionality of the goods and services, geographies, and type of customer. The Company regularly
reviews standalone selling prices and updates these estimates as necessary.
The Company recognizes revenue when the performance
obligations are satisfied by transferring control over the goods or service to a customer.
The Company’s revenue consists of the
following:
Sales of goods:
Sales of goods are and have historically been
comprised of net sales of medical devices (ESWL lithotripters and HIFU devices) and net sales of disposables (mostly Ablapaks and
Focalpaks in the HIFU division and electrodes in the UDS division). Sales of goods also includes products such as urology laser
and urodynamics devices distributed through our agents and third-party distributors.
For devices and disposables, revenue is recognized when the Company
transfers control to the customer (i.e. when the customer has the ability to direct the use of, and obtain substantially all of
the remaining benefit from, the device or disposables), which is generally at the point of delivery or installation, depending
on the terms of the arrangement (i.e. when the customer can use the goods to provide services or sell or exchange the good), and
based on contractual incoterms.
The Company’s sales arrangements do
not provide a right of return. The goods are generally covered by a period of one to two years standard warranty upon installation.
The Company also provides training associated with the sales of goods; such training-related costs are immaterial in the context
of the contract with the customer and do not constitute a distinct performance obligation.
Sales of RPPs and leases:
Sales of RPP and leases include the revenues
from the sale of treatment procedures and from the leasing of machines. We provide machines to clinics and hospitals for free for
a limited period, rather than selling the devices. These hospitals and clinics perform treatments using the devices and usually
pay us based on the number of individual treatments provided.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
Revenues related to the sale of treatments invoiced
on a ‘‘Revenue-Per-Procedure’’ (‘‘RPP’’) basis are recognized when the treatment
procedure has been completed. Revenues from devices leased to customers under operating leases are recognized on a straight-line
basis.
Regarding multiple-element arrangements with
a lease component, a portion of the contract is allocated to the lease component on the basis of observable market prices applied
by the Company for similar devices under operating leases. The lease component is recognized on a straight line basis over the
contractual period. Other components under the contract are recognized in accordance with their nature.
Sales of spare parts and services:
Revenues related to spare parts are recognized
when spare parts are delivered to distributors who perform their own maintenance services. Spare parts used in the performance
of EDAP’s own maintenance and repair services are generally not recognized separately, unless specified in the contract.
Revenues related to Services mainly consist
of maintenance contracts which rarely exceed one year and are recognized on a straight line basis over the term of the service
period as the customer benefits from the service throughout the service contract period. For services rendered when no maintenance
contract is in place or for services not included in the scope of a maintenance contract, revenues are recorded when services are
performed.
The Company recognizes revenue for extended
warranties included in the multiple-element arrangements as a separate performance obligation in Sales of services on a straight-line
basis over the extended warranty period. In the majority of countries in which the Company operates, the statutory warranty period
is one to two years and the extended warranty covers periods beyond this statutory period. Standard warranties do not constitute
a separate performance obligation. The Company accrues for the warranty costs at the time of sale of the device through the multiple-element
arrangement.
Agents and distributors:
As part of its sale process in countries
other than continental France, when the Company does not have a local subsidiary, sales of goods to end-customers are
performed through agents and distributors. Such agents and distributors are primarily responsible for the sales’
process, bear the inventory risk, and are free to determine the sale prices. Sales of goods to agents and distributors are
recognized when the control is transferred to the related agent or distributor which generally occurs based on contractual
incoterms.
Deferred revenue:
Deferred revenue for the periods presented
primarily relates to service contracts where the service fees are billed up-front, generally quarterly or annually, prior to those
services having been performed, and consists primarily of billing or cash receipts in advance of services due under maintenance
contracts or extended warranty contracts. The associated deferred revenue is generally recognized ratably over the service period.
Disaggregation of revenue:
Disaggregation by primary geographical market,
and timing of revenue recognition is reported in Note 18.
Contract Balances:
Details on contract liabilities are
reported on Note 12.
The Company applies the practical expedient
in paragraph 606-10-50-14 and does not disclose information about remaining performance obligations that have original expected
durations of one year or less. This relates mainly to maintenance services.
1-6 Costs of sales
Costs of sales include all direct product costs,
costs related to shipping, handling, duties and importation fees, as well as certain indirect costs such as service and supply
chain departments expenses. Indirect costs are allocated by type of sales (goods, RPP and leases, spare parts and services) using
an allocation method determined by management by type of costs and segment activities and reviewed on an annual basis.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
1-7 Shipping and handling costs
Shipping and handling costs are not considered
as performance obligations. Shipping and handling costs are recorded as a component of cost of sales.
1-8 Cash equivalents and short term investments
Cash equivalents are cash investments which
are highly liquid and have initial maturities of 90 days or less.
Cash investments with a maturity higher than
90 days are considered as short-term investments.
1-9 Accounts Receivables
Accounts receivables are stated at cost net
of allowances for doubtful accounts. The Company makes judgments as to its ability to collect outstanding receivables and provides
allowances for the portion of receivables when collection becomes doubtful. Provision is made based upon a specific review of all
significant outstanding invoices. These estimates are based on our bad debt write-off experience, analysis of credit information,
specific identification of probable bad debt based on our collection efforts, aging of accounts receivables and other known factors.
Accounts receivable also include factored receivables for which the Company is bearing the collection risk.
1-10 Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost
and net realizable value. Cost is either the manufacturing cost, which is principally comprised of components and labor costs for
our own manufactured products, or purchase price for urology products we distribute. Cost is determined on a first-in, first-out
basis for components and spare parts and by specific identification for finished goods (medical devices). The Company establishes
reserves for inventory estimated to be obsolete, unmarketable or slow moving, first based on a detailed comparison between quantity
in inventory and historical consumption and then based on case-by-case analysis of the difference between the cost of inventory
and the related estimated market value.
1-11 Property and equipment
Property and equipment is stated at historical
cost. Depreciation of property and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the
related assets, as follows:
Leasehold improvements (in years)
|
|
|
10 or lease term if shorter
|
|
Equipment (in years)
|
|
3
|
-
|
10
|
Furniture, fixtures, fittings and other (in years)
|
|
2
|
-
|
10
|
Equipment includes industrial equipment and research equipment that
has alternative future uses. Equipment also includes devices that are manufactured by the Company and leased to customers through
operating leases related to Revenue-Per-Procedure transactions and devices subject to sale and leaseback transactions. This equipment
is depreciated over a period of seven years.
1-12 Long-lived assets
The Company reviews the carrying value of its
long-lived assets, including fixed assets and intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of such assets may not be fully recoverable. Recoverability of long-lived assets is assessed by a comparison
of the carrying amount of the assets (or the Group of assets, including the asset in question, that represents the lowest level
of separately-identifiable cash flows) to the total estimated undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset or
group of assets. If the future net undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset or group of assets, the
asset or group of assets is considered impaired and an expense is recognized equal to the amount required to reduce the carrying
amount of the asset or group of assets to its then fair value. Fair value is determined by discounting the cash flows expected
to be generated by the assets, when the quoted market prices are not available for the long-lived assets. Estimated future cash
flows are based on assumptions and are subject to risk and uncertainty.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
1-13 Goodwill and intangible assets
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price
over the fair value of identifiable net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill is not amortized but instead tested annually for
impairment or more frequently when events or change in circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired by comparing the
carrying value to the fair value of the reporting units to which it is assigned. Under ASC 350, “Goodwill and other intangible
assets”, the impairment test is performed in two steps. The first step compares the fair value of the reporting unit with
its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, a second step
is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss. The second step allocates the fair value of the reporting unit to the Company’s
tangible and intangible assets and liabilities. This derives an implied fair value for the reporting unit’s goodwill. If
the carrying amount of the reporting units’ goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss
is recognized equal to that excess. For the purpose of any impairment test, the Company relies upon projections of future undiscounted
cash flows and takes into account assumptions regarding the evolution of the market and its ability to successfully develop and
commercialize its products.
Changes in market conditions could have a major
impact on the valuation of these assets and could result in additional impairment losses.
Intangible assets consist primarily of purchased
patents relating to lithotripters, purchased licenses, a purchased trade name and a purchased trademark. The basis for valuation
of these assets is their historical acquisition cost. Amortization of intangible assets is calculated by the straight-line method
over the shorter of the contractual or estimated useful life of the assets, as follows:
Patents (in years)
|
|
|
5
|
|
SAP Licenses (in years)
|
|
|
10
|
|
Other licenses (in years)
|
|
|
5
|
|
Trade name and trademark (in years)
|
|
|
7
|
|
1-14 Treasury Stocks
Treasury stock purchases are accounted for at
cost. The sale of treasury stocks is accounted for using the first in first out method. Gains on the sale or retirement of treasury
stocks are accounted for as additional paid-in capital whereas losses on the sale or retirement of treasury stock are recorded
as additional paid-in capital to the extent that previous net gains from sale or retirement of treasury stocks are included therein;
otherwise the losses shall be recorded to accumulated benefit (deficit) account. Gains or losses from the sale or retirement of
treasury stock do not affect reported results of operations. Treasury stocks held by a Company cannot exceed 10% of the total number
of shares issued.
1-15 Warranty expenses
The Company provides customers with a warranty
for each product sold and accrues warranty expense at time of sale based upon historical claims experience. Standard warranty period
may vary from 1 year to 2 years depending on the market. Actual warranty costs incurred are charged against the accrual when paid
and are classified in cost of sales in the statement of income. Warranty expense amounted to €131 thousand, €433 thousand
and €316 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
1-16 Income taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance
with ASC 740, ‘‘Accounting for Income Taxes’’ Under ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined
based on differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured by applying enacted
tax rates and laws to taxable years in which such differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is established if,
based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all of the deferred tax assets, will
not be realized. In accordance with ASC740, no provision has been made for income or withholding taxes on undistributed earnings
of foreign subsidiaries, such undistributed earnings being permanently reinvested.
Under ASC740, the measurement of a tax position
that meets the more-likely-that-not recognition threshold must take into consideration the amounts and probabilities of the outcomes
that could be realized upon ultimate settlement using the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
1-17 Research and development costs
Research and development costs are recorded as an expense in the
period in which they are incurred.
The French government provides tax credits to
companies for innovative research and development. This tax credit is calculated based on a percentage of eligible research and
development costs and it can be refundable in cash and is not contingent on future taxable income. As such, the Company considers
the research tax credits as a grant, offsetting research and development expenses.
1-18 Advertising costs
Advertising costs are recorded as an expense
in the period in which they are incurred and are included in selling and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated
statements of income (loss). Advertising costs amounted to €739 thousand, €719 thousand and €672 thousand for the
years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
1-19 Foreign currency translation and transactions
Translation of the financial statements of
consolidated companies
The reporting currency of EDAP TMS S.A. for
all years presented is the euro (€). The functional currency of each subsidiary is its local currency. In accordance with
ASC 830, all accounts in the financial statements are translated into euro from the functional currency at the following exchange
rates:
•
assets and liabilities are translated at year-end exchange rates;
•
shareholders’ equity is translated at historical exchange rates (as of the date of contribution);
•
statement of income items are translated at average exchange rates for the year; and
•
translation gains and losses are recorded in a separate component of shareholders’ equity.
Foreign currencies transactions
Transactions involving foreign currencies are
translated into the functional currency using the exchange rate prevailing at the time of the transactions. Receivables and payables
denominated in foreign currencies are translated at year-end exchange rates. The resulting unrealized exchange gains and losses
are carried to the statement of income.
Presentation in the Statement of Income
Aggregate foreign currency transactions gains
and losses are disclosed in a single caption in the Statement of Income under section “Foreign currency exchange gain (loss),
net”.
1-20 Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing
income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted
earnings per share reflects potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised
or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company. The
dilutive effects of the Company’s common stock options and warrants is determined using the treasury stock method to measure
the number of shares that are assumed to have been repurchased using the average market price during the period, which is converted
from U.S. dollars at the average exchange rate for the period.
1-21 Derivative instruments
ASC 815 requires the Company to recognize all
of its derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position at fair value. The accounting
for changes in the fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and
qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and further, on the type of hedging relationship. For those derivative instruments
that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, the Company must classify the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure
being hedged, as fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation.
Gains and losses from derivative instruments
are recorded in the Statement of Income.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
1-22 Employee stock option plans
At December 31, 2018, the Company had four stock-based
employee compensation plans. ASC 718 requires the recognition of fair value of stock compensation as an expense in the calculation
of net income (loss).
1-23 Warrants
The Company recorded outstanding warrants issued in March 2012,
May 2013 and April 2016 as a liability. Pursuant to guidance of ASC 815-40-15-7(i), the Company determined that the said warrants
could not be considered as being indexed to the Company’s own stock, on the basis that the exercise price of the warrants
was determined in U.S. dollars while the functional currency of the Company is the Euro. As of December 31, 2018 and 2019, there
were no more warrants outstanding.
1-24 Leases
Leases as a Lessee
In accordance with ASC 842, Leases, and as
from January 1, 2019, the Company classifies all leases at the inception of a contract and assess whether the contract is, or contains,
a lease. The assessment is based on: (1) whether the contract involves the use of a distinct identified asset, (2) whether the
company controls the use of the identified asset (e.g. whether the company has the right to obtain substantially all of
the economic benefits from the use of the asset throughout the period, and whether the company has the right to direct the use
of the asset).
Leases are classified as either finance leases
or operating leases. A lease is classified as a finance lease if any one of the following criteria are met: the lease transfers
ownership of the asset by the end of the lease term, the lease grants an option to purchase the asset that the lessee is reasonably
certain to exercise, the lease term is for a major part of the economic life of the underlying asset or the present value of the
sum of the lease payments and any residual value guaranteed equals or exceeds substantially all of the fair value of the underlying
asset. A lease is classified as an operating lease if it does not meet any one of these criteria. Substantially all our operating
leases are comprised of office space leases, and substantially all our finance leases are comprised of office furniture and technology
equipment.
The Company recognizes a right-of-use (“ROU”)
asset and a lease liability at the lease commencement date. The right-of-use asset is initially measured at cost, which primarily
comprises the initial amount of the lease liability, plus any initial direct costs incurred, plus prepaid lease payments, less
any lease incentives received. All ROU assets are reviewed for impairment. The lease liability is initially measured at the present
value of the lease payments, discounted using the incremental borrowing rate for assets of same duration or characteristics.
For operating leases, the ROU asset is subsequently
measured throughout the lease term at the carrying amount of the lease liability, plus initial direct costs, plus (minus) any prepaid
(accrued) lease payments. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
For finance leases, the ROU asset is subsequently
amortized using the straight-line method from the lease commencement date to the earlier of the end of its useful life or the end
of the lease term unless the lease transfers ownership of the underlying asset to the Company or the Company is reasonably certain
to exercise an option to purchase the underlying asset. In those cases, the ROU asset is amortized over the useful life of the
underlying asset. Amortization of the ROU asset is recognized and presented separately from interest expense on the lease liability.
Variable lease payments associated with the Company’s leases are
recognized when the event, activity, or circumstance in the lease agreement on which those payments are assessed occurs. Variable
lease payments are presented as operating expenses in the Company’s consolidated statements of income in the same line item
as expenses arising from fixed lease payments (operating leases) or amortization of the ROU asset (finance leases).
Lease payments included in the measurement
of the lease liability comprise the following: the fixed payments, including in-substance fixed payments, variable lease payments
that depend on an index or rate, payments for optional renewal periods where it is reasonably certain the renewal period will be
exercised, and payments for penalties for early termination options unless it is reasonably certain the lease will not be terminated
early, the exercise price of an option to purchase the underlying asset if the company is reasonably certain to exercise the option,
and residual value guarantees.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
Our real estate leases generally include non-lease
maintenance services. The consideration in the contract is allocated to the lease and non-lease components based on standalone
selling prices.
Some of our real estate leases contain variable
lease payments, including payments based on an index or rate. Variable lease payments based on an index or rate are initially measured
using the index or rate in effect at lease commencement, and changes to index and rate-based variable lease payments are recognized
in profit or loss in the period of the change. Variable payments that do not depend on an index or rate, such as rental payments
based on the use of the underlying asset or property taxes and insurance reimbursement, are recorded as operating expense when
incurred. Lease modifications result in remeasurement of the lease payments when that modification is not accounted for as a separate
contract.
Lease expense for operating leases consists
of the lease payments plus any initial direct costs, primarily brokerage commissions, and is recognized on a straight-line basis
over the lease term. Included in lease expense are any variable lease payments incurred in the period that were not included in
the initial lease liability. Lease expense for finance leases consists of the amortization of the right-of-use asset on a straight-line
basis over the lease term and interest expense determined on an amortized cost basis. The lease payments are allocated between
a reduction of the lease liability and interest expense.
The lease term for all of the Company’s
leases includes the non-cancellable period of the lease.
We have elected not to recognize right-of-use
assets and lease liabilities for short-term leases that have a term of 12 months or less. The effect of short-term leases on our
right-of-use asset and lease liability was not material. We have elected not to review the classification for expired or existing
leases, prior to January 1, 2019.
Leases as a Lessor:
A lessor shall classify a lease as a sales-type lease when the lease meets any of the
following criteria at lease commencement:
|
•
|
The lease transfers ownership of the underlying asset to the lessee by the end of the
lease term.
|
|
•
|
The lease grants the lessee an option to purchase the underlying asset that the lessee
is reasonably certain to exercise.
|
|
•
|
The lease term is for the major part of the remaining economic life of the underlying
asset. However, if the commencement date falls at or near the end of the economic life of the underlying asset, this criterion
shall not be used for purposes of classifying the lease.
|
|
•
|
The present value of the sum of the lease payments and any residual value guaranteed
by the lessee that is not already reflected in the lease payments in accordance with paragraph 842-10-30-5(f) equals or exceeds
substantially all of the fair value of the underlying asset.
|
|
•
|
The underlying asset is of such a specialized nature that it is expected to have no
alternative use to the lessor at the end of the lease term.
|
When none of the criteria are met:
A lessor shall classify the lease as either a direct financing lease or an operating
lease. A lessor shall classify the lease as an operating lease unless both of the following criteria are met, in which case the
lessor shall classify the lease as a direct financing lease:
|
•
|
The present value of the sum of the lease payments and any residual value guaranteed
by the lessee that is not already reflected in the lease payments in accordance with paragraph 842-10-30-5(f) and/or any other
third party unrelated to the lessor equals or exceeds substantially all of the fair value of the underlying asset;
|
|
•
|
It is probable that the lessor will collect the lease payments plus any amount necessary
to satisfy a residual value guarantee.
|
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
1-25 Recent accounting pronouncements
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02,
Leases (ASU 2016-02), which supersedes ASC 840 “Leases” and creates a new topic, ASC 842 "Leases." This update
requires lessees to recognize on their balance sheet a lease liability and a lease asset for all leases, including operating leases,
with a term greater than 12 months. The update also expands the required quantitative and qualitative disclosures surrounding leases.
This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years, with
earlier application permitted. The Company adopted the new standard as of January 1, 2019. The Company performed an analysis of
all contracts to identify lease components or rights of use. The Company determined that the new standard mostly applies to leases
for facilities situated in France, Japan and in the U.S. and for Company’s equipment, vehicles and IT equipment. The last
category has been determined as being below the threshold and not material.
The Company adopted ASC 842 using a modified retrospective transition
approach for all leases existing at or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial
statements. The Company adopted the new standard as of January 1, 2019 with practical expedients, and did not restate comparative
prior periods. The adoption of ASC 842 had a material effect on our consolidated balance sheet, but did not materially affect the
consolidated statement of income (loss). The most significant impact was the recognition of the operating lease right-of-use assets
and the liability for operating leases. The accounting for finance leases (capital leases) was substantially unchanged. Accordingly,
upon adoption, leases that were classified as operating leases under ASC 840 were classified as operating leases under ASC 842,
and we recorded an adjustment of €3,5 million to operating lease right-of-use assets and the related lease liability
in 2019. The lease liability is based on the present value of the remaining minimum lease payments, determined under ASC 840, discounted
using our secured incremental borrowing rate at the effective date of January 1, 2019, using the original lease term as the tenor.
As permitted under ASC 842, we elected several practical expedients that permit us to not reassess (1) whether a contract is or
contains a lease, (2) the classification of existing leases, and (3) whether previously capitalized costs continue to qualify as
initial indirect costs. The application of the practical expedients did not have a significant impact on the measurement of the
operating lease liability.
As a result, the Company adapted its internal
controls to identify contracts and apply the new GAAP.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial
Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, or ASU 2016-13, which changes the impairment
model for most financial assets. The new model uses a forward-looking expected loss method, which will generally result in earlier
recognition of allowances for losses. ASU 2016-13 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019
and early adoption is permitted for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company will adopt ASU 2016-13
on January 1, 2020. Even if we are not yet in a position to assess the impact of the new standard on our results of operations
or financial position we are not expecting a significant impact on our accounts.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles
- Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” This update eliminates step 2 from the goodwill impairment
test, and requires the goodwill impairment test to be performed by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying
amount. An impairment charge should be recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s
fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. This
guidance is effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2020. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill
impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company will adopt this pronouncement on January 1, 2020.
The Company does not expect an impact on our accounts.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
2— CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments are comprised
of the following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
20,886
|
|
|
|
19,464
|
|
Short term investments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents, and short term investments
|
|
|
20,886
|
|
|
|
19,464
|
|
3— TRADE ACCOUNTS AND NOTES RECEIVABLE, NET
Trade accounts and notes receivable consist of the following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
11,807
|
|
|
|
12,907
|
|
Notes receivable
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(1,490
|
)
|
|
|
(1,405
|
)
|
Total
|
|
|
11,330
|
|
|
|
11,910
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(11,328
|
)
|
|
|
(11,884
|
)
|
Total long-term portion
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Notes receivable usually represent commercial
bills of exchange (drafts) with initial maturities of 90 days or less.
Bad debt expenses amount to a net cost of €84
thousand, a net cost of €362 thousand and €107 thousand, respectively for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and
2017.
Long term portion consists of sales type leases
of medical devices.
Future minimum payments to be received over
the five coming years are as follows:
|
|
Sales type
leases
|
2020
|
|
|
12
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2
|
|
2022
|
|
|
-
|
|
2023
|
|
|
-
|
|
2024
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total minimum payments
|
|
|
14
|
|
4— OTHER RECEIVABLES
Other receivables consist of the following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Research and development tax credit receivable from the French State
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
Value-added taxes receivable
|
|
|
422
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
Other receivables from Government and public authorities
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
Others
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
|
|
1,434
|
|
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
5— INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Components, spare parts
|
|
|
4,959
|
|
|
|
3,496
|
|
Work-in-progress
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
Finished goods – own manufactured products
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
|
|
2,672
|
|
Finished goods – distribution products
|
|
|
1,981
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
Total gross inventories
|
|
|
9,262
|
|
|
|
8,186
|
|
Less: allowance for slow-moving inventory and net realizable value
|
|
|
(1,085
|
)
|
|
|
(974
|
)
|
Total
|
|
|
8,178
|
|
|
|
7,212
|
|
The provision for slow moving inventory relates
to components and spare parts. The allowance for slow moving inventory (excluding exchange rate impact), the changes in which are
classified within cost of sales, amounted to a cost of €168 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2019, a cost of €227
thousand for the year ended December 31, 2018, and an income of €41 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2017, respectively.
6— OTHER ASSETS
Other assets consist of the following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Prepaid expenses, current portion
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
Total
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
Prepaid expenses mainly consist of rental and
future congresses expenses.
7— PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Property and equipment consist of Property and
equipment purchased or capitalized by the Company and financing leases for 2019 or capital leases for 2018.
7-1 Property and Equipment, net
Property and equipment consist of the following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Equipment
|
|
|
7,002
|
|
|
|
5,973
|
|
Furniture, fixture, and fittings and other
|
|
|
2,776
|
|
|
|
2,641
|
|
Total gross value
|
|
|
9,778
|
|
|
|
8,614
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(6,644
|
)
|
|
|
(5,624
|
)
|
Total
|
|
|
3,134
|
|
|
|
2,991
|
|
Depreciation expense related to property and
equipment amounted to €1,511 thousand, €981 thousand and €935 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018
and 2017, respectively.
Assets leased to customers:
Capitalized costs on equipment leased to customers
of €342 thousand and €351 thousand are included in property and equipment at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Accumulated amortization of these assets leased to third parties was €95 thousand and €72 thousand, at December 31, 2019
and 2018, respectively.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
Depreciation expense on equipment leased to
customer is included in total depreciation expense and amounted to €23 thousand, €51 thousand and €24 thousand,
for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
7-2 Financing leases and capital leases
Financing lease right-of-use assets in 2019
and capital leases for previous years consist of the following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Equipment
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
824
|
|
Vehicles and IT equipment
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
Total gross value
|
|
|
2,295
|
|
|
|
2,247
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,360
|
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
Total
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
Depreciation expense related to financing lease
right-of-use assets amounted to €448 thousand, €386 thousand and €218 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018,
2017, respectively.
The reduction to right-of-use assets resulting
from reductions to financing lease obligations amounted €122 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2019.
8— OPERATING LEASE RIGHT-OF-USE ASSETS
Operating lease right-of-use assets consist
of the following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Facilities
|
|
|
2,387
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture, fixture, and fittings and other
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total net operating lease right of use
|
|
|
2,647
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
The reduction to right-of-use assets resulting
from reductions to operating lease obligations amounted €836 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Variable lease costs related to above contracts
amounted to €108 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Non-recognized lease liabilities for short term
leases amounted to €71 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2019.
9— GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
As discussed in Note 1-13, ASC 350 requires
that goodwill not be amortized but instead be tested at least annually for impairment, or more frequently when events or change
in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired, by comparing the carrying value to the fair value of the reporting
unit to which they are assigned. The Company considers its ASC 280 operating segment — High Intensity Focused Ultrasound
(HIFU) and Urology Devices and Services (UDS) — to be its reporting units for purposes of testing for impairment. Goodwill
amounts to €1,767 thousand for the UDS division and to €645 thousand for the HIFU division, at December 31, 2019 and
2018.
The Company completed the required annual impairment
test in the fourth quarter of 2019. To determine the fair value of the Company’s reporting units, the Company used the discounted
cash flow approach for each of the two reportable units. In both cases, the fair value of the reporting unit was in excess of the
reporting unit's book value, which resulted in no goodwill impairment.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
Intangible assets consist of the following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Licenses
|
|
|
1,466
|
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
Trade name and trademark
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
Patents
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
Organization costs
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
Total gross value
|
|
|
2,625
|
|
|
|
2,577
|
|
Accumulated amortization for licenses
|
|
|
(699
|
)
|
|
|
(587
|
)
|
Accumulated amortization for trade name and trademark
|
|
|
(424
|
)
|
|
|
(411
|
)
|
Accumulated amortization for patents
|
|
|
(412
|
)
|
|
|
(412
|
)
|
Accumulated amortization for organization costs
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
Less: Total accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(1,855
|
)
|
|
|
(1,730
|
)
|
Total
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
847
|
|
Amortization expenses related to intangible
assets amounted to €113 thousand, €110 thousand and €74 thousand, for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and
2017, respectively.
For the five coming years, the annual estimated
amortization expense will consist of the following:
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
2020
|
|
|
106
|
|
2021
|
|
|
97
|
|
2022
|
|
|
90
|
|
2023
|
|
|
83
|
|
2024
|
|
|
83
|
|
Total
|
|
|
460
|
|
10— TRADE ACCOUNTS AND NOTES PAYABLE
Trade accounts and notes payable consist of
the following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
|
6,034
|
|
|
|
6,286
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Total
|
|
|
6,046
|
|
|
|
6,297
|
|
Trade accounts payable usually represent invoices
with a due date of 90 days or less and invoices to be received.
Notes payable represent commercial bills of
exchange (drafts) with initial maturities of 90 days or less.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
11— DEFERRED REVENUES
Deferred revenues consist of the following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Deferred revenues on maintenance contracts
|
|
|
1,741
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
Deferred revenue on RPP
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
Deferred revenue on sale of devices
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
Deferred revenue on extension of warranty, included in sales contracts
|
|
|
837
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
Deferred research and development grants
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,205
|
|
|
|
2,902
|
|
Less long term portion
|
|
|
(1,313
|
)
|
|
|
(973
|
)
|
Current portion
|
|
|
1,892
|
|
|
|
1,929
|
|
Deferred revenue on extension of warranty will
be recognized over the following periods:
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
237
|
|
2021
|
|
|
268
|
|
2022
|
|
|
257
|
|
2023
|
|
|
70
|
|
2024
|
|
|
4
|
|
Total
|
|
|
837
|
|
The components of deferred revenue on extension
of warranty for the year ended December 31, 2019 are as follows:
|
|
Total
|
Balance as of December 31, 2017
|
|
|
676
|
|
New extension of warranty
|
|
|
331
|
|
Recognition of revenue
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
Balance as of December 31, 2018
|
|
|
855
|
|
New extension of warranty
|
|
|
254
|
|
Recognition of revenue
|
|
|
(272
|
)
|
Balance as of December 31, 2019
|
|
|
837
|
|
12— OTHER ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Other accrued liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Retirement indemnities
|
|
|
2,444
|
|
|
|
2,287
|
|
Provision for warranty costs
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
Accruals for payroll and associated taxes
|
|
|
738
|
|
|
|
680
|
|
Conditional government advances
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
Value added tax payable
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
Advances received from customers
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
Provision for Asset Retirement Obligation (Japan)
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Provision for employee termination indemnities (Italy)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
Provision for employee termination indemnities (Korea)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Others
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,676
|
|
|
|
5,923
|
|
Less non-current portion
|
|
|
(3,567
|
)
|
|
|
(3,800
|
)
|
Current portion
|
|
|
2,109
|
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
We receive government conditional advances and
grants for advanced research programs we conduct alone or in connection with other unrelated entities (mainly HECAM project) which
are provided for and managed by French state-owned entities, and specifically “Banque Publique d’Investissement”
(“Bpifrance”). We, alone or with other unrelated entities, enter into multi-year contractual arrangements for the financing
of specific research programs. These arrangements consist of both grants and conditional advances which are paid in fixed instalments
at predetermined contractual dates, subject generally to milestones based on progress of the research and documentation. Grants
received are non-refundable. Conditional advances received are subject to a fixed 1.44% interest rate. If and when the research
program is considered a commercial success, contractual repayment is required. In addition, if we decide to stop the research program,
the conditional advance may be repayable. Grants that relate to expenses we incur for this research program are recognized in the
line item “Research and Development Expenses” in the period in which the expenses subject to the grants have been incurred
(see Note 20).
Conditional advances as of December 31, 2019
mature as follows, should the underlying Research Program advance as per contract:
2020
|
|
|
-
|
|
2021
|
|
|
6
|
|
2022
|
|
|
209
|
|
2023
|
|
|
209
|
|
2024 and thereafter
|
|
|
646
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
Changes in the provision for warranty costs are as follows:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Beginning of year
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
Amount used during the year
|
|
|
(308
|
)
|
|
|
(335
|
)
|
New warranty expenses
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
End of year
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
Long term portion
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
13— LEASE OBLIGATIONS
13-1 Financing leases
The Company leases certain of its equipment
under finance leases. At December 31, 2019, this equipment consists of medical devices for a liability amount of €305 thousand
and vehicles and other IT equipment for a liability amount of €740 thousand. Maturities of finance leases liabilities for
the years ending December 31, 2019 are as follows:
|
|
December 31,
|
2020
|
|
|
415
|
|
2021
|
|
|
299
|
|
2022
|
|
|
221
|
|
2023
|
|
|
122
|
|
2024 and thereafter
|
|
|
30
|
|
Total undiscounted minimum lease payments
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
Less: amount representing interest
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Present value of minimum lease payments
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
(392
|
)
|
Long-term portion
|
|
|
653
|
|
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
Interest paid under finance lease obligations
was €29 thousand the year ended December 31, 2019.
The weighted average remaining lease term and
the weighted average discount rate for finance leases at December 31, 2019 was: 3.2 years and 2.44%.
13-2 Operating leases
Maturities of operating leases liabilities consist
of the following amounts:
|
|
December 31,
|
2020
|
|
|
980
|
|
2021
|
|
|
758
|
|
2022
|
|
|
474
|
|
2023
|
|
|
349
|
|
2024 and thereafter
|
|
|
171
|
|
Total undiscounted minimum lease payments
|
|
|
2,732
|
|
Less: amount representing interest
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
Present value of minimum lease payments
|
|
|
2,684
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
(958
|
)
|
Long-term portion
|
|
|
1,726
|
|
The weighted average remaining lease term and
the weighted average discount rate for operating leases at December 31, 2019 was : 3.51 years and 1.56%.
Total rent expenses under operating leases
amounted to €828 thousand, €1,002 thousand and €904 thousand, for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017,
respectively. These total rent expenses are related to office rentals, office equipment and car rentals.
14— SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
As of December 31, 2019, short-term borrowings
consist mainly of €3,185 thousand of factored account receivables and for which the Company is bearing the collection risk
and €328 thousand of short borrowing in Japan.
As of December 31,
2018, short-term borrowings consist mainly of €3,683 thousand of factored account receivables and for which the Company is
bearing the collection risk.
15— LONG TERM DEBT AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS CARRIED AT FAIR VALUE
15-1 Long-term debt:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
France term loan
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
526
|
|
Japanese term loan (YEN)
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
Germany term loan
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
Italy term loan
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Malaysia term loan
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Total long term debt
|
|
|
1,420
|
|
|
|
1,830
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(462
|
)
|
|
|
(491
|
)
|
Total long-term portion
|
|
|
957
|
|
|
|
1,339
|
|
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
As of December 31, 2019, long-term debt in Japan
consists of two new loans in Yen with the following conditions:
|
|
Initial
Amount
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Fixed
Interest rate
|
|
Frequency
of
principal payments
|
EDAP Technomed Co. Ltd
|
|
|
80,000,000
|
|
|
August 2, 2026
|
|
|
1.98
|
%
|
|
Monthly instalment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EDAP Technomed Co. Ltd
|
|
|
40,000,000
|
|
|
April 15, 2020
|
|
|
2.91
|
%
|
|
Monthly instalment
|
As of December 31, 2018, long-term debt in Japan
consists of a loan in Yen with the following conditions:
|
|
Initial
Amount
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Fixed Interest rate
|
|
Frequency of
principal payments
|
EDAP Technomed Co. Ltd
|
|
|
80,000,000
|
|
|
November 30, 2025
|
|
|
1.98
|
%
|
|
Monthly instalment
|
This long-term debt was
fully reimbursed in August 2019.
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, long-term
debt in Germany consists of three loans in euro with the following conditions:
|
|
Initial
Amount
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Fixed Interest rate
|
|
Frequency of
principal payments
|
EDAP TMS GMBH
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
November 30, 2020
|
|
|
2.49
|
%
|
|
Monthly instalment
|
This loan is pledged by an HIFU equipment with
a purchase value of €450 thousand.
|
|
Initial
Amount
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Fixed Interest rate
|
|
Frequency of
principal payments
|
EDAP TMS GMBH
|
|
|
136,500
|
|
|
December 31, 2022
|
|
|
2.25
|
%
|
|
Monthly instalment
|
This loan is pledged by a UDS equipment with
a purchase value of €136 thousand.
|
|
Initial
Amount
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Fixed Interest rate
|
|
Frequency of
principal payments
|
EDAP TMS GMBH
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
April 30, 2023
|
|
|
2.40
|
%
|
|
Monthly instalment
|
This loan is pledged by an HIFU equipment with
a purchase value of €438 thousand.
As of December 31, 2018, long-term debt in Italy
consists of a loan in euro for an initial amount of €242 thousand with an interest rate of Euribor 1 month + 4.5% which matured
on June 6, 2019.
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, long-term
debt in France consists of one loan in Euro to finance the ERP project with the following conditions:
|
|
Initial
Amount
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Fixed Interest rate
|
|
Frequency of
principal payments
|
EDAP TMS FRANCE
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
October 16, 2021
|
|
|
0.40
|
%
|
|
Quarterly instalment
|
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, long-term
debt in Malaysia consists of a loan in Ringgit with the following conditions:
|
|
Initial
Amount
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Fixed Interest rate
|
|
Frequency of
principal payments
|
EDAP TECHNOMED SDN BHD
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
July 31, 2022
|
|
|
4.64
|
%
|
|
Monthly instalment
|
15-2 Financial instruments carried at fair value:
On March 28, 2012, pursuant to a securities
purchase agreement dated March 22, 2012, as amended, the Company issued new ordinary shares in the form of ADSs to selected institutional
investors in a registered direct placement (the “March 2012 Placement”) with warrants attached (the “March 2012
Investor Warrants”) allowing Investors to purchase up to 1,406,250 new ordinary shares of the Company. The Company also issued
warrants to the placement agent, Rodman & Renshaw LLC (the “March 2012 Placement Agent Warrants” giving rights
to the Placement Agent to purchase up to 168,750 new shares of the Company (together with the March 2012 Investor Warrants: the
“March 2012 Warrants”). The Company determined that the March 2012 Warrants should be accounted for as a liability.
The Company used the Black-Scholes pricing model to value the March 2012 Warrants at inception, with subsequent changes in fair
value recorded as a financial expense or income.
On May 28, 2013, pursuant to a securities
purchase agreement dated May 20, 2013, as amended, the Company issued 3,000,000 new ordinary shares in the form of ADSs to selected
institutional investors in a registered direct placement (the “May 2013 Placement”), at a price of $4.00 per share,
with warrants attached (the “May 2013 Investor Warrants”). The May 2013 Investor Warrants allowed investors to purchase
up to 1,500,000 shares in the form of ADSs at an exercise price of $4.25. The May 2013 Investor Warrants were exercisable as from
November 29, 2013 and expired on November 29, 2018. The Company also issued warrants to the placement agent, H.C. Wainwright &
Co., LLC with an exercise price of $5.00 per share (the “May 2013 Placement Agent Warrants” and together with the May
2013 Investor Warrants, the “May 2013 Warrants”), The May 2013 Placement Agent Warrants were exercisable from November
29, 2013 and expired on May 28, 2016. As the May 2013 Warrants comprised the same structure and provisions than the March 2012
Warrants, including an exercise price determined in U.S. dollars while the functional currency of the Company is the Euro, the
Company determined that the May 2013 Warrants should be accounted for as a liability. Total gross proceeds for the May 2013 Placement
amounted to $12 million (€ 9.270 million), out of which $3.817 million (€2.950 million) allocated to the Investor and
Placement Agent Warrants based on their fair value and accounted for as liability, and the remaining $8.183 million (€6.320
million) allocated to the share capital increase (see note 16-1). The Company used the Black-Scholes pricing model to value the
May 2013 Warrants at inception, with changes in fair value recorded as a financial expense or income.
On April 14, 2016, pursuant to a securities
purchase agreement dated April 7, 2016, the Company issued 3,283,284 ordinary shares in the form of ADSs to selected institutional
investors in a registered direct placement (the “April 2016 Placement”), at a price of $3.50 per share, with warrants
attached (the “April 2016 Investor Warrants”). The April 2016 Investor Warrants allowed investors to purchase up to
3,283,284 shares in the form of ADSs at an exercise price of $4.50. The April 2016 Investor Warrants were exercisable from October
14, 2016 and expired on October 14, 2018. As the April 2016 Warrants comprised the same structure and provisions than the March
2012 and May 2013 Warrants, including an exercise price determined in U.S. dollars while the functional currency of the Company
is the Euro, the Company determined that the April 2016 Warrants should be accounted for as a liability. Total gross proceeds for
the placement amounted to $11.5 million (€ 10.2 million), out of which $3.578 million (€3.168 million) allocated to the
Investor Warrants based on their fair value and accounted for as liability, and the remaining $7.913 million (€7.006 million)
allocated to the share capital increase (see Note 16-1). The Company used the Black-Scholes pricing model to value the April 2016
Warrants at inception, with changes in fair value recorded as a financial expense or income.
As of December 31, 2018 and 2019, there were
no more warrants outstanding.
Refer to Note 24 for more details on the fair value of Financial
Instruments.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
15-3 Long-term debt maturity:
Long-term debt carried at fair value at December
31, 2019 mature as follows:
2020
|
|
|
462
|
|
2021
|
|
|
384
|
|
2022
|
|
|
208
|
|
2023
|
|
|
122
|
|
2024 and thereafter
|
|
|
243
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,420
|
|
16— OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Other long-term liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Provision for retirement indemnities (Japan & France), less current portion
|
|
|
2,167
|
|
|
|
2,222
|
|
Provision for employee termination indemnities (Italy) less current portion
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
Provision for employee termination indemnities (Korea) less current portion
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Provision for Asset Retirement Obligation (Japan) less current portion
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Provision for warranty costs, less current portion
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
Conditional government advances, less current portion
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
Accrued interest less current portion
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,567
|
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
Provision for asset retirement obligation in
Japan is related to subsidiary’s offices and warehouses.
Pension, post-retirement and post-employment
benefits for most of the Company’s employees are sponsored by European governments. In addition to government-sponsored plans,
subsidiaries in Japan and France have defined benefit retirement indemnity plans in place. The provision for retirement indemnities
at December 31, 2019 represents an accrual for lump-sum retirement indemnity payments to be paid at the time an employee retires
if he or she is still present at the Company at the date of retirement. This provision has been calculated taking into account
the estimated payment at retirement (discounted to the current date), turnover and salary increases.
The provision is management’s best estimate based on the following
assumptions as of year-end:
|
|
Pension Benefits - France
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
0.90
|
%
|
|
|
1.60
|
%
|
Salary increase
|
|
|
2.50
|
%
|
|
|
2.50
|
%
|
Retirement age
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Average retirement remaining service period
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits - Japan
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
0.60
|
%
|
|
|
0.50
|
%
|
Salary increase
|
|
|
2.50
|
%
|
|
|
2.50
|
%
|
Retirement age
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Average retirement remaining service period
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
The discount rate retained is determined by reference to the high
quality rates for AA- rated corporate bonds for a duration equivalent to that of the obligations. It derives from a benchmark per
monetary area of different market data at the closing date.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
In 2019, provision presentation according to ASC 715 in thousands
of euros:
|
|
France
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
Total
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
In 2018, provision presentation according to ASC 715 in thousands
of euros:
|
|
France
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
Total
|
|
|
815
|
|
|
|
895
|
|
The Company does not have a funded benefit plan.
Detailed reconciliation of pension cost components (in thousands of euros) during fiscal year for each of the three years ending
December 31, 2019:
France
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in benefit obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligations at beginning of year
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Net loss or (gain)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Actuarial (gain) or loss
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net prior service cost
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Benefit obligations at end of year (1)
|
|
|
969
|
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
895
|
|
Unrecognized
actuarial (gain) loss (2)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost (2)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Accrued pension cost
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
|
815
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
(1)
|
The accumulated benefit obligation
was €693 thousand and €692 thousand at December 31, 2019 and 2018 respectively.
|
|
(2)
|
The amount in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit costs
in 2020 is €1 thousand.
|
Japan
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in benefit obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligations at beginning of year
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Amortization of net loss
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Actuarial (gain) / loss
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Exchange rate impact
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
Benefit obligations at end of year(1)
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
Unrecognized actuarial (gain) loss (2)
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost (2)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Accrued pension cost
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
(1)
|
The accumulated benefit obligation
was €1,062 thousand and €960 thousand at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
|
|
(2)
|
The amount in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit costs
in 2020 is €1 thousand.
|
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
The benefits expected to be paid in each of
the next five fiscal years, and in the aggregate for the five fiscal years thereafter, are detailed in the table below:
|
|
France
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
2021
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
2022
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
2023
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
2024
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
2025-2029
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
17— SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
17-1 Common stock
As of December 31, 2019, EDAP TMS S.A.’s
common stock consisted of 29,433,994 issued shares fully paid and with a par value of €0.13 each. 29,141,566 of the shares
were outstanding.
17-2 Pre-emptive subscription rights
Shareholders have preemptive rights to subscribe
on a pro rata basis for additional shares issued by the Company for cash. Shareholders may waive such preemptive subscription
rights at an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders under certain circumstances. Preemptive subscription rights, if not
previously waived, are transferable during the subscription period relating to a particular offer of shares.
17-3 Dividend rights
Dividends may be distributed from the statutory
retained earnings, subject to the requirements of French law and the Company’s by-laws. The Company has not distributed any
dividends since its inception as the result of an accumulated statutory deficit of €15,392 thousand. Dividend distributions,
if any, will be made in euros. The Company has no plans to distribute dividends in the foreseeable future.
17-4 Treasury stock
As of December 31, 2019, all 292,428 shares
held as treasury stock consisted of (i) 112,138 shares acquired between August and December 1998 and (ii) 180,290 shares acquired
in June and July 2001 for a total of €718 thousand. All treasury stocks have been acquired to cover outstanding stock options
(see Note 17-5).
17-5 Stock-option plans
As of December 31, 2019, the 292,428 ordinary shares held as treasury
stock were dedicated to serve stock purchase option plans as follows: 42,000 shares which may be purchased at a price of €2.38
per share pursuant to the exercise of options that were granted on June 25, 2010, the balance of 250,428 may be allocated by the
Board of Directors in the future, as per June 28, 2019 shareholders’ approval.
As of December 31, 2019, EDAP TMS S.A. sponsored
four stock purchase and subscription option plans open to employees of EDAP TMS group:
On June 24, 2010, the shareholders authorized
the Board of Directors to grant up to 229,100 options to purchase pre-existing Shares at a fixed price to be set by the Board of
Directors. All of the Shares that may be purchased through the exercise of stock options are currently held as treasury stock.
Conforming to this stock option plan, on June 25, 2010, the Board of Directors granted 229,100 options to purchase existing Shares
to certain employees of EDAP TMS. The exercise price was fixed at €2.38 per share. Options were to begin vesting one year
after the date of grant and were fully vested as of June 25, 2014 (i.e., four years after the date of grant). Shares acquired pursuant
to the options cannot be sold prior to four years from the date of grant. The options expire on June 25, 2020 (i.e., ten years
after the date of grant) or when employment with the Company ceases, whichever occurs earlier. There was no impact on 2017, 2018
and 2019 operating expenses, in accordance with ASC 718. Under this plan, 42,000 options are outstanding and exercisable at December
31, 2019.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
On December 19, 2012, the shareholders authorized
the Board of Directors to grant up to 500,000 options to subscribe to 500,000 new shares at a fixed price to be set by the Board
of Directors. Conforming to this stock option plan, the Board of Directors granted 500,000 options to subscribe Shares to certain
employees of EDAP TMS on January 18, 2013. The exercise price was fixed at €1.91 per share. Options were to begin vesting
one year after the date of grant and all options were fully vested as of January 18, 2017 (i.e., four years after the date of grant).
Shares acquired pursuant to the options cannot be sold prior to four years from the date of grant. The options expire on January
18, 2023 (i.e., ten years after the date of grant) or when employment with the Company ceases, whichever occurs earlier. At December
31, 2013 the total fair value of the options granted under this plan was €660 thousand. This non-cash financial charge has
been recognized in the Company’s operating expenses over a period of 48 months (using the graded vesting method). The impact
on operating income, in accordance with ASC 718, was €2 thousand, €0 thousand and €0 thousand, in 2017, 2018 and
2019, respectively. Under this plan, 282,500 options are outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2019.
On February 18, 2016, the shareholders authorized
the Board of Directors to grant up to 1,000,000 options to subscribe to 1,000,000 new shares at a fixed price to be set by the
Board of Directors. Conforming to this stock option plan, the Board of Directors granted 575,000 options to subscribe Shares to
certain employees of EDAP TMS on April 26, 2016. The exercise price was fixed at €3.22 per share. Options were to begin vesting
one year after the date of grant and all options will be fully vested as of April 26, 2020 (i.e., four years after the date of
grant). Shares acquired pursuant to the options cannot be sold prior to four years from the date of grant. The options expire on
April 26, 2026 (i.e., ten years after the date of grant) or when employment with the Company ceases, whichever occurs earlier.
At December 31, 2016 the total fair value of the options granted under this plan was €960 thousand. This non-cash financial
charge will be recognized in the Company’s operating expenses over a period of 48 months (using the graded vesting method).
Conforming to this February 18, 2016 stock option
plan, the Board of Directors granted 260,000 options to subscribe Shares to certain employees of EDAP TMS on April 25, 2017. The
exercise price was fixed at €2.39 per share. Options were to begin vesting one year after the date of grant and all options
will be fully vested as of April 25, 2021 (i.e., four years after the date of grant). Shares acquired pursuant to the options cannot
be sold prior to four years from the date of grant. The options expire on April 25, 2027 (i.e., ten years after the date of grant)
or when employment with the Company ceases, whichever occurs earlier. At December 31, 2017, the total fair value of the options
granted on April 25, 2017 under this plan was €335 thousand. This non-cash financial charge will be recognized in the Company’s
operating expenses over a period of 48 months (using the graded vesting method).
Conforming to this February 18, 2016 stock option
plan, the Board of Directors granted 165,000 options to subscribe Shares to certain employees of EDAP TMS on August 29, 2018. The
exercise price was fixed at €2.65 per share. Options were to begin vesting one year after the date of grant and all options
will be fully vested as of August 29, 2022 (i.e., four years after the date of grant). Shares acquired pursuant to the options
cannot be sold prior to four years from the date of grant. The options expire on August 29, 2029 (i.e., ten years after the date
of grant) or when employment with the Company ceases, whichever occurs earlier. At December 31, 2018, the total fair value of the
options granted on August 29, 2018 under this plan was €219 thousand. This non-cash financial charge will be recognized in
the Company’s operating expenses over a period of 48 months (using the graded vesting method).
Conforming to this February 18, 2016 stock option
plan, the Board of Directors granted 155,000 options to subscribe Shares to certain employees of EDAP TMS on April 4, 2019. The
exercise price was fixed at €3.90 per share. Options were to begin vesting one year after the date of grant and all options
will be fully vested as of April 4, 2023 (i.e., four years after the date of grant). Shares acquired pursuant to the options cannot
be sold prior to four years from the date of grant. The options expire on April 4, 2029 (i.e., ten years after the date of grant)
or when employment with the Company ceases, whichever occurs earlier. At December 31, 2019, the total fair value of the options
granted on April 4, 2019 under this plan was €299 thousand. This non-cash financial charge will be recognized in the Company’s
operating expenses over a period of 48 months (using the graded vesting method).
The impact on this February 18, 2016 Plan on
operating income, in accordance with ASC 718, was €380 thousand, €289 thousand and €260 thousand in 2017, 2018 and
2019, respectively.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
Under this 2016 plan, 949,400 options are outstanding
and 494,400 options are exercisable at December 31, 2019.
On June 28, 2019, the shareholders authorized
the Board of Directors to grant up to a maximum of 358,528 options to purchase pre-existing Shares and to grant 1,000,000 options
to subscribe to 1,000,000 new shares at a fixed price to be set by the Board of Directors. As of December 31, 2019, none of the
options authorized under this Plan have been allocated.
Forfeited stock-options are recognized as they
occur, in accordance with ASU 2016-09.
The fair value of each stock option granted
during the year is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Weighted-average expected life (years)
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
Expected volatility rates(1)
|
|
|
49.45
|
%
|
|
|
52.6
|
%
|
|
|
57.4
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
-0.08
|
%
|
|
|
0.18
|
%
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
Weighted-average exercise price (€)
|
|
|
3.90
|
|
|
|
2.65
|
|
|
|
2.39
|
|
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year (€)
|
|
|
1.93
|
|
|
|
1.33
|
|
|
|
1.29
|
|
(1) Historical volatility calculated over 10 years.
As of December 31, 2019, a summary of stock
option activity to purchase or to subscribe to Shares under these plans is as follows:
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
(€)
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
(€)
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
(€)
|
Outstanding on January 1,
|
|
|
1,347,600
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
|
|
|
1,207,600
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
|
|
|
1,427,438
|
|
|
|
2.94
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
|
|
3.90
|
|
|
|
165,000
|
|
|
|
2.65
|
|
|
|
260,000
|
|
|
|
2.39
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(143,700
|
)
|
|
|
2.16
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(60,000
|
)
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(85,000
|
)
|
|
|
1.94
|
|
|
|
(25,000
|
)
|
|
|
3.05
|
|
|
|
(134,750
|
)
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(285,088
|
)
|
|
|
3.99
|
|
Outstanding on December 31,
|
|
|
1,273,900
|
|
|
|
2.78
|
|
|
|
1,347,600
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
|
|
|
1,207,600
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
|
Exercisable on December 31,
|
|
|
818,900
|
|
|
|
2.60
|
|
|
|
772,600
|
|
|
|
2.44
|
|
|
|
598,850
|
|
|
|
2.29
|
|
Share purchase options available for grant on December 31
|
|
|
250,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
The following table summarizes information about
options to purchase existing Shares held by the Company, or to subscribe to new Shares, at December 31, 2019:
|
|
Outstanding options
|
|
Fully vested options(1)
|
Exercise price (€)
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
life
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
(€)
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(2)
(€)
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
(€)
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.90
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
3.90
|
|
|
|
5,954
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
3.22
|
|
|
485,000
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
3.22
|
|
|
|
352,013
|
|
|
|
363,750
|
|
|
|
3.22
|
|
|
|
264,010
|
|
2.65
|
|
|
145,000
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
2.65
|
|
|
|
187,891
|
|
|
|
36,250
|
|
|
|
2.65
|
|
|
|
46,973
|
|
2.39
|
|
|
189,400
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
2.39
|
|
|
|
294,669
|
|
|
|
94,400
|
|
|
|
2.39
|
|
|
|
146,868
|
|
2.38
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
|
|
|
65,764
|
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
|
|
|
65,764
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
282,500
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
575,114
|
|
|
|
282,500
|
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
575,114
|
|
1.91 to 3.90
|
|
|
1,273,900
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
2.78
|
|
|
|
1,481,405
|
|
|
|
818,900
|
|
|
|
2.60
|
|
|
|
1,098,728
|
|
|
(1)
|
Fully
vested options are all exercisable options
|
|
(2)
|
The aggregate
intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value, based on the Company’s
closing stock price of $4.43 at December 31, 2019, which would have been received by
the option holders had all in-the-money option holders exercised their options as of
that date.
|
A summary of the status of the non-vested options
to purchase shares or to subscribe to new shares as of December 31, 2019, and changes during the year ended December 31, 2019,
is presented below:
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted
average
Grant-Date Fair
Value (€)
|
Non-vested at January 1, 2019
|
|
|
575,000
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(204,400
|
)
|
|
|
1.52
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(70,600
|
)
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2019
|
|
|
455,000
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
As of December 31, 2019, there were €271
thousand of total unrecognized compensation expenses related to non-vested stock-options, over a period of 3.25 years.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
17-6 Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
The components of accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) net of tax, for the years ended December 31, 2019, and 2018, are as follows:
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019
|
|
|
Foreign currency
translation
adjustments
|
|
Provision for
retirement
indemnities
|
|
Total
|
Beginning balance
|
|
|
(3,173
|
)
|
|
|
(577
|
)
|
|
|
(3,748
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
(3,234
|
)
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
(3,436
|
)
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
Foreign currency
translation
adjustments
|
|
Provision for
retirement
indemnities
|
|
Total
|
Beginning balance
|
|
|
(3,027
|
)
|
|
|
(577
|
)
|
|
|
(3,604
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
(3,173
|
)
|
|
|
(577
|
)
|
|
|
(3,748
|
)
|
As there is an allowance recorded against deferred tax assets,
there is no net impact of tax.
18— TOTAL SALES
Amount of net sales derived from our operations
in Asia, France, the United States. and other geographical areas, are as follows:
Primary geographical markets (€)
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Asia
|
|
|
17,939
|
|
|
|
14,119
|
|
|
|
13,461
|
|
France
|
|
|
11,350
|
|
|
|
11,577
|
|
|
|
10,573
|
|
United States
|
|
|
5,194
|
|
|
|
2,048
|
|
|
|
1,748
|
|
Others geographical areas
|
|
|
10,377
|
|
|
|
11,419
|
|
|
|
9,904
|
|
|
|
|
44,859
|
|
|
|
39,163
|
|
|
|
35,686
|
|
The amount of net sales is recognized following the timing above:
Timing of revenue recognition
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Products transferred at a point in time
|
|
|
36,767
|
|
|
|
31,373
|
|
|
|
28,760
|
|
Products and services transferred over time
|
|
|
8,092
|
|
|
|
7,790
|
|
|
|
6,927
|
|
|
|
|
44,859
|
|
|
|
39,163
|
|
|
|
35,686
|
|
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
19— OTHER REVENUES
Other revenues consist of the following:
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Licenses and others
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Total
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
In 2019, 2018 and 2017, other revenues mainly
consist of sales of a license to Theraclion and training to customers.
20— COSTS OF SALES
Costs of sales consist of the following:
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Direct costs of sales
|
|
|
(14,919
|
)
|
|
|
(13,683
|
)
|
|
|
(12,706
|
)
|
Indirect costs of sales
|
|
|
(8,990
|
)
|
|
|
(8,583
|
)
|
|
|
(8,232
|
)
|
Total costs of sales
|
|
|
(23,909
|
)
|
|
|
(22,266
|
)
|
|
|
(20,938
|
)
|
21— RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES
Research and development expenses consist of
the following:
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Gross research and development expenses
|
|
|
(4,727
|
)
|
|
|
(4,863
|
)
|
|
|
(4,539
|
)
|
Research Tax Credit
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
Grants
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
Net Research and development expenses
|
|
|
(3,728
|
)
|
|
|
(4,088
|
)
|
|
|
(3,881
|
)
|
In 2019 grants consisted mainly of national
grants for the assessment and optimization of the focal treatments of prostate cancer (Perfuse development project).
In 2018 and 2017 grants mainly consisted of
European, national and regional grants for the development of innovative imaging solutions for the focal treatment of liver cancer
(HECAM Development project).
Research and development costs are expensed
as incurred and include amortization of assets, costs of prototypes, salaries, benefits and other headcount related costs, contract
and other outside service fees, and facilities and overhead costs.
22— FINANCIAL INCOME, NET
Interest (expense) income, net consists of the
following:
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Interest income
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
Warrants exercised / forfeited
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
Changes in fair value of Financial Instrument (1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,044
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
797
|
|
|
|
2,643
|
|
|
(1)
|
For more details
on the fair value of Financial Instruments, please refer to Notes 14-2 and 25.
|
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
23— INCOME TAXES
23-1 Income / (Loss) before income taxes
Income / (loss) before income taxes is comprised of the following:
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
France
|
|
|
1,803
|
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
Other countries
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
(1,667
|
)
|
|
|
(1,296
|
)
|
Total
|
|
|
2,191
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
23-2 Income tax (expense)/ benefit
Income tax (expense)/benefit consists of the following:
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Current income tax expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
France
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
Other countries
|
|
|
(550
|
)
|
|
|
(351
|
)
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
Sub-total current income tax expense
|
|
|
(787
|
)
|
|
|
(515
|
)
|
|
|
(534
|
)
|
Deferred income tax (expense) benefit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
France
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Other countries
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
Sub-total deferred income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(679
|
)
|
|
|
(358
|
)
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
23-3 Deferred income taxes:
Deferred income taxes reflect the impact of
temporary differences between the amounts of assets and liabilities reported for financial reporting purposes and such amounts
as measured in accordance with tax laws. The tax effects of temporary differences which give rise to significant deferred tax assets
(liabilities) are as follows by nature:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Net operating loss carry forwards
|
|
|
13,642
|
|
|
|
13,675
|
|
Elimination of intercompany profit in inventory
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
Elimination of intercompany profit in fixed assets
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
Provisions for retirement indemnities
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
Capital leases treated as operating leases for tax
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Other items
|
|
|
544
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
15,410
|
|
|
|
14,877
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
15,410
|
|
|
|
14,877
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(14,977
|
)
|
|
|
(14,553
|
)
|
Deferred tax assets (liabilities), net of allowance
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards available amounts to €57,701
thousand as of December 31, 2019, of which €31,359 thousand at EDAP TMS SA, €22,413 thousand at Edap Technomed Inc.,
€2,171 thousand at Edap Technomed Co Ltd Japan, €1,758 thousand at EDAP Technomed Italia S.R.L. These net operating losses
generate deferred tax assets of €13,642 thousand as at December 31, 2019. Realization of these tax assets is contingent on
future taxable earnings in the applicable tax jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2019, €55,530 thousand out of these €57,701
thousand net operating loss carry-forwards have no expiration date but the amount of the net operating loss carry-forward, which
can be used each year to offset taxable earnings, is limited in all jurisdictions. The remaining tax loss carry-forwards expire
from years 2019 through 2029. In accordance with ASC 740, a valuation allowance is established if, based on the weight of available
evidence, it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
The 2017 U.S. Tax Act was enacted on December
22, 2017. The 2017 U.S. Tax Act includes a number of changes in existing tax law which impacted our business in the U.S. Starting
with tax year 2018, the U.S. corporate tax rates changed from a graduated system ranging from 15% to 39% to a flat 21% of taxable
net income. For taxable net income of $100K and greater for years 2018 and following, EDAP’s U.S. subsidiary would
pay significantly lower taxes than with the previous tax law.
Starting from tax year 2019, the French corporate
tax rates of taxable net income will gradually decrease from 28% to 25% in 2022.
23-4 Effective tax income (expense)
A reconciliation of differences between the
statutory French income tax rate and the Company’s effective tax income (loss) is as follows:
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Effective income / (loss) tax at French statutory tax rate
|
|
|
(614
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
98
|
|
Income of foreign subsidiaries taxed at different tax rates
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
64
|
|
Effect of net operating loss carry-forwards and valuation allowances
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
(1,530
|
)
|
Non-taxable debt fair value variation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
Permanent differences
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
(392
|
)
|
|
|
178
|
|
Effect of cancellation of intra-group positions
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
French business tax included in income tax (CVAE)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
Effective income (loss) tax
|
|
|
(679
|
)
|
|
|
(358
|
)
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
23-5 Uncertainty in Income Taxes
According to ASC 740, the Company reviewed the
tax positions of each subsidiary. On December 31, 2019 the Company believes that there is no significant uncertainty in the Company’s
tax positions.
The Company remains subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions.
Interest and penalties on income taxes are classified as a component
of the provision for income taxes. There were no interest or penalties in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
24— EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
Income (loss) available to common shareholders (in Euros)
|
|
|
1,512,056
|
|
|
|
(€338,382)
|
|
|
|
(€681,345)
|
|
Number of shares for the computation of basic EPS
|
|
|
29,016,118
|
|
|
|
28,997,866
|
|
|
|
28,961,928
|
|
Basic EPS (in Euros)
|
|
|
€0.05
|
|
|
|
(€0.01)
|
|
|
|
(€0.02)
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities
|
|
|
604,238
|
|
|
|
347,500
|
|
|
|
581,915
|
|
Number of shares for the computation of diluted EPS
|
|
|
29,615,466
|
|
|
|
28,997,866
|
|
|
|
28,961,928
|
|
Diluted EPS income / (loss) (in Euros)
|
|
|
€0.05
|
|
|
|
(€0.01)
|
|
|
|
(€0.02)
|
|
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
Diluted EPS income / (loss) available to common
shareholders is computed including all dilutive securities that are in the money.
The effects of dilutive securities for the years
ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as a net loss was reported in
these periods.
25— COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
25-1 Commitments
The Company currently has commitments regarding
its operating leases as described in Note 12-2.
25-2 Contingencies
The Company currently has contingencies relating
to warranties provided to customers for products as described in Note 1-15 and Note 11.
26— FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following disclosure of the estimated fair
value of financial instruments was made in accordance with the requirements of ASC 820 ‘‘Disclosure about fair value
of financial instruments’’ and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized to determine
such fair value.
ASC 820 defines three levels of inputs that
may be used to measure fair value and requires that the assets or liabilities carried at fair value be disclosed by the input level
under which they were valued. The input levels are defined as follows:
Level 1: Quoted (unadjusted) prices
in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the reporting entity can access at the measurement date.
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted
prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs for the asset or
liability.
|
|
ASC 820
Level
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
20,886
|
|
|
|
19,464
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
3,513
|
|
|
|
3,683
|
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
1,420
|
|
|
|
1,830
|
|
Investor Warrants
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
The recorded amount of cash and cash equivalents
and short-term borrowings are a reasonable estimate of their fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.
The fair market value (Level 1 measurement)
of the Company’s long-term debt is estimated using interest rate available to the Company in corresponding markets for debt
with similar terms and maturities (see note 15-1 Long-term debt).
Concerning Investor and Placement Agent Warrants,
the Company uses a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair value of the Warrants changed over time depending on the volatility
and share price at balance sheet date (see note 15-2 - Financial instruments carried at fair value).
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
The following tables provide a reconciliation
of fair value for which the Company used Level 3 inputs, for the period from December 31, 2016 to December 31, 2019:
All amounts in
thousands Euros unless otherwise
stated
|
|
Investor
Warrants
2012
|
|
Investor
Warrants
2013
|
|
Investor
Warrants
2016
|
|
Total Financial
instruments
carried at fair
value
|
As of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
2,162
|
|
|
|
3,921
|
|
Warrants forfeited (see note 21)(1)
|
|
|
(489
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(489
|
)
|
Warrants exercises (see note 21) (1)
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
FV adjustments (see note 21) (1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(656
|
)
|
|
|
(1,388
|
)
|
|
|
(2,044
|
)
|
USD/EUR exchange impact(2)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
|
|
(412
|
)
|
As of December 31, 2017
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
840
|
|
FV adjustments (see note 21) (1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(345
|
)
|
|
|
(544
|
)
|
|
|
(889
|
)
|
USD/EUR exchange impact(2)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
As of December 31, 2018
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
As of December 31, 2019
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
(1) Reported
in the Consolidated Statement of Income in line “Financial (expenses) income net”
(2)Reported
in the Consolidated Statement of Income in line “Foreign currency exchange gain (loss), net”
Please refer to “Note 15 – Long
term debt and financial instruments carried out at fair value” for additional details.
27— CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
Financial instruments, which potentially subject
the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of cash and cash equivalents and trade accounts and notes receivable
from customers, primarily located in France, Japan and the United States. The Company maintains cash deposits with major banks.
Management periodically assesses the financial condition of these institutions and believes that credit risk is limited.
The Company has implemented procedures to monitor
the creditworthiness of its customers. The Company obtains bank guarantees for first time or infrequent customers, and in certain
cases obtains insurance against the risk of a payment default by the customer. The Company reviewed individual customer balances
considering current and historical loss experience and general economic conditions in determining the allowance for doubtful accounts
receivable of €1.5 million and €1.4 million, for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Actual losses may vary from the current estimates,
and any adjustments are reported in earnings in the periods in which they become known.
In 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company did not
generate more than 10% revenue with a single customer.
28— FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSACTIONS
The Company generates a significant percentage
of its revenues, and of its operating expenses, in currencies other than the euro. The Company’s operating profitability
could be materially adversely affected by large fluctuations in the rate of exchange between the euro and such other currencies.
The Company engages in foreign exchange hedging activities when it deems necessary, but there can be no assurance that hedging
activities will be offset by the impact of movements in exchange rates on the Company’s results of operations. As of December
31, 2019, there were no outstanding hedging instruments.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
29— SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company currently has two reporting segments:
the High Intensity Focused Ultrasound division and the Urological Devices and Services division. The following tables set forth
the key Statement of Income figures, by segment for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 and the key balance sheet figures, by segment,
for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017.
The business in which the Company operates is
the development and production of minimally invasive medical devices, primarily for the treatment of urological diseases. Substantially
all revenues result from the sale of medical devices and their related license and royalty payments from third parties. The segments
derive their revenues from this activity.
Segment operating profit or loss and segment
assets are determined in accordance with the same policies as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies.
Interest income and expense, current and deferred income taxes are not allocated to individual segments. A reconciliation of segment
operating profit or loss to consolidated net loss is as follows:
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Segment operating income (loss)
|
|
|
2,201
|
|
|
|
(1,315
|
)
|
|
|
(2,027
|
)
|
Financial income (expense), net
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
797
|
|
|
|
2,643
|
|
Foreign Currency exchange (losses) gains, net
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
(909
|
)
|
Income tax (expense) credit
|
|
|
(679
|
)
|
|
|
(358
|
)
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
Consolidated net profit (loss)
|
|
|
1,512
|
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
(681
|
)
|
A summary of the Company’s operations
by segment is presented below for years ending December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:
|
|
HIFU Division
|
|
UDS Division
|
|
Reconciling
items(1)
|
|
Total
consolidated
|
2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of goods
|
|
|
8,311
|
|
|
|
21,800
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30,111
|
|
Sales of RPPs & leases
|
|
|
4,162
|
|
|
|
1,585
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,747
|
|
Sales of spare parts and services
|
|
|
1,618
|
|
|
|
7,383
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,001
|
|
Total sales
|
|
|
14,092
|
|
|
|
30,768
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
44,859
|
|
External other revenues
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
14,144
|
|
|
|
30,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,912
|
|
Total COS
|
|
|
(6,152
|
)
|
|
|
(17,757
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(23,909
|
)
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
7,991
|
|
|
|
13,011
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21,002
|
|
R&D expenses
|
|
|
(1,962
|
)
|
|
|
(1,766
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,728
|
)
|
Selling and marketing expenses
|
|
|
(4,402
|
)
|
|
|
(6,448
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(10,850
|
)
|
G&A expenses
|
|
|
(1,168
|
)
|
|
|
(1,758
|
)
|
|
|
(1,297
|
)
|
|
|
(4,224
|
)
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
(7,533
|
)
|
|
|
(9,972
|
)
|
|
|
(1,297
|
)
|
|
|
(18,802
|
)
|
Operating income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
3,039
|
|
|
|
(1,297
|
)
|
|
|
2,201
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
16,665
|
|
|
|
32,392
|
|
|
|
4,012
|
|
|
|
53,068
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
915
|
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,532
|
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
|
4,096
|
|
|
|
6,875
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,971
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
1,767
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,412
|
|
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
HIFU Division
|
|
UDS Division
|
|
Reconciling
Items(1)
|
|
Total
consolidated
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of goods
|
|
|
5,494
|
|
|
|
19,576
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25,070
|
|
Sales of RPPs & leases
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,086
|
|
Sales of spare parts and services
|
|
|
1,780
|
|
|
|
7,227
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,007
|
|
Total sales
|
|
|
11,025
|
|
|
|
28,139
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
39,163
|
|
External other revenues
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
11,044
|
|
|
|
28,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,183
|
|
Total COS
|
|
|
(5,312
|
)
|
|
|
(16,954
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(22,266
|
)
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
5,732
|
|
|
|
11,185
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16,917
|
|
R&D expenses
|
|
|
(2,394
|
)
|
|
|
(1,694
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,088
|
)
|
Selling and marketing expenses
|
|
|
(4,628
|
)
|
|
|
(5,923
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(10,551
|
)
|
G&A expenses
|
|
|
(1,036
|
)
|
|
|
(1,311
|
)
|
|
|
(1,246
|
)
|
|
|
(3,593
|
)
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
(8,057
|
)
|
|
|
(8,928
|
)
|
|
|
(1,246
|
)
|
|
|
(18,232
|
)
|
Operating income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(2,325
|
)
|
|
|
2,257
|
|
|
|
(1,246
|
)
|
|
|
(1,315
|
)
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
13,648
|
|
|
|
29,849
|
|
|
|
5,243
|
|
|
|
48,740
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
1,154
|
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,928
|
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
|
2,855
|
|
|
|
5,158
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,013
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
1,767
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,412
|
|
|
|
HIFU Division
|
|
UDS Division
|
|
Reconciling
items(1)
|
|
Total
consolidated
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of goods
|
|
|
4,232
|
|
|
|
18,348
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
22,580
|
|
Sales of RPPs & leases
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,095
|
|
Sales of spare parts and services
|
|
|
1,445
|
|
|
|
6,566
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,011
|
|
Total sales
|
|
|
9,477
|
|
|
|
26,209
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
35,686
|
|
External other revenues
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
9,513
|
|
|
|
26,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,746
|
|
Total COS
|
|
|
(4,732
|
)
|
|
|
(16,207
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(20,938
|
)
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
4,782
|
|
|
|
10,026
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
14,808
|
|
R&D expenses
|
|
|
(2,469
|
)
|
|
|
(1,413
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,881
|
)
|
Selling and marketing expenses
|
|
|
(4,004
|
)
|
|
|
(5,521
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(9,526
|
)
|
G&A expenses
|
|
|
(1,009
|
)
|
|
|
(1,057
|
)
|
|
|
(1,362
|
)
|
|
|
(3,428
|
)
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
(7,482
|
)
|
|
|
(7,991
|
)
|
|
|
(1,362
|
)
|
|
|
(16,835
|
)
|
Operating income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(2,701
|
)
|
|
|
2,035
|
|
|
|
(1,362
|
)
|
|
|
(2,027
|
)
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
11,333
|
|
|
|
27,803
|
|
|
|
7,761
|
|
|
|
46,897
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
|
928
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,118
|
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
|
2,804
|
|
|
|
4,278
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,082
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
1,767
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,412
|
|
(1)
|
|
For year 2017, these data were reported under “EDAP
TMS (Corporate)”
|
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
30— VALUATION ACCOUNTS
|
|
Allowance for
deferred tax
assets
|
|
Allowance for
doubtful
accounts
|
|
Slow-moving
inventory
|
|
Warranty
reserve
|
Balance as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
19,450
|
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
Charges to costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,536
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
Deductions: write-off and others
|
|
|
(6,720
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(319
|
)
|
|
|
(415
|
)
|
Balance as of December 31, 2017
|
|
|
14,266
|
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
723
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
Charges to costs and expenses
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
Deductions: write-off and others
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(334
|
)
|
Balance as of December 31, 2018
|
|
|
14,553
|
|
|
|
1,404
|
|
|
|
974
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
Charges to costs and expenses
|
|
|
859
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
Deductions: write-off and others
|
|
|
(435
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
(308
|
)
|
Balance as of December 31, 2019
|
|
|
14,977
|
|
|
|
1,490
|
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
31— SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Interest and income taxes paid are as follows:
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Income taxes paid (refunds received)
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Interest received
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Non-cash transactions:
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Financing lease obligations incurred
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
Operating lease obligations incurred
|
|
|
3,483
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Operating cash flow from operating leases
|
|
|
828
|
|
Operating cash flow from finance leases
|
|
|
29
|
|
Financing cash flow from finance leases
|
|
|
396
|
|
32— RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In 2019, EDAP Technomed Co. Ltd. (Japan) contracted
a loan amounting 80,000,000 JPY. As a current practice in Japan, this loan required a personal warranty from the representative
director, president and CEO of the subsidiary Mr. Jean-François Bachelard. EDAP TMS S.A., as the mother company, counter-warranted
this personal loan and agreed to indemnify Mr. Bachelard in an indemnification letter dated September 12, 2019.
In 2019, EDAP Technomed Sdn Bdh (Malaysia) contracted with Maybank
to establish a fixed deposit amounting 65,464.85 MYR. As a current practice in Malaysia, any fixed deposit requires a personal
warranty from the representative director, president and CEO of the subsidiary Mr. Hervé de Soultrait. EDAP TMS S.A., as
the mother company, counter-warranted this deposit and agreed to indemnify Mr. de Soultrait in an indemnification letter dated
September 13, 2019.
In 2019, EDAP Technomed Inc. contracted a car
lease amounting 28,756.44 USD. This lease required a personal warranty from the president of the subsidiary Mr. Marc Oczachowski.
EDAP TMS S.A., as the mother company, counter-warranted this personal lease warranty and agreed to indemnify Mr. Marc Oczachowski
in an indemnification letter dated July 1, 2019.
EDAP TMS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
33— SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On February 27, 2020, we decided to
liquidate our Italian wholly-owned subsidiary EDAP Technomed Srl as the subsidiary continued to record financial losses.
Liquidation process is currently being rolled out. Sales, distribution and service activities will be pursued through a
dedicated distributor.
On March 25, 2020,
the Board of Directors accepted the resignation of Mr. Philippe Chauveau as Chairman of the Board and, upon the recommendation
of the Company’s Nomination Committee, the Board decided to combine the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer and elected Mr. Marc Oczachowski as the new Chairman of the Board of Directors.
The novel COVID-19 virus which has profoundly
impacted the whole worldwide economy in early 2020 represents a new challenge for us all. We are currently closely monitoring
the situation and have implemented numerous precautions and protective measures to safeguard our employees and to ensure an uninterrupted
supply of our devices and disposables, including requiring the majority of our employees to work remotely, maintaining minimum
supply chain activity and curtailing all business travel. Further, from April 1, 2020, our facility in Lyon, France has been closed
with only minimal staff to expedite shipments of disposals at planned intervals. In the near term, we expect this situation to
continue to cause decreased activity in our recurring business activity with some cancellations of ESWL and HIFU treatments. We
also anticipate that device sales projects may be postponed on a near-term basis as hospital purchase and investment decisions
are put on hold. However, our sales cycles are long and we have in inventory several devices and accessories that are ready to
be shipped when order activity resumes.
F-44