ITEM 1. Business
General
Melrose Bancorp, Inc.
Melrose Bancorp, Inc. (“Melrose Bancorp”
or the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Maryland in February 2014 for the purpose of becoming the bank holding
company for Melrose Bank (the “Bank”), upon consummation of the Bank’s mutual to stock conversion. The conversion
was consummated in October 2014 at which time Melrose Bancorp became the registered bank holding company of the Bank. In connection
with the conversion, the Company sold 2,723,409 shares of common stock, at an offering price of $10 per share, and issued an additional
106,170 shares of its common stock to the Melrose Cooperative Bank Foundation, resulting in an aggregate issuance of 2,829,579
shares of common stock. The net proceeds from the stock offering, net of offering costs of $1,716,000, amounted to $25,518,000.
The Company’s stock began trading on October 22, 2014 on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “MELR”.
To date, other than holding all of the Bank’s issued and outstanding stock and making a loan to the Bank’s employee
stock ownership plan, the Company is not engaged in any material business.
Melrose Bancorp uses the support staff
and offices of Melrose Bank and pays Melrose Bank for these services. If we expand or change our business in the future, we may
hire our own employees although we do not expect that this will happen in the near future.
Melrose Bancorp is a registered bank holding
company and is subject to comprehensive regulation and examination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Melrose
Bancorp’s executive and administrative office is located at 638 Main Street, Melrose, Massachusetts 02176, and our telephone
number at this address is (781) 665-2500. Our website address is
www.melrosebank.com
. Information on this website should
not be considered a part of this annual report.
Melrose Bank
Melrose Bank is a Massachusetts-chartered
cooperative bank headquartered in Melrose, Massachusetts. Melrose Cooperative Bank was incorporated in 1890 and has operated continuously
in or around the surrounding area of Melrose, Massachusetts since that time.
We provide financial services to individuals,
families and businesses through our full-service banking office in Melrose, Massachusetts. Our primary business activity consists
of taking deposits from the general public in our market area and investing those deposits, together with funds generated from
operations, in one- to four-family residential real estate loans, home equity loans and lines of credit and commercial real estate
loans. To a lesser extent, we also originate, commercial construction and consumer loans. We offer a variety of deposit accounts
to consumers and small businesses, including certificate of deposit accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts and demand
and NOW accounts. The Bank offers online and mobile banking services, and in 2018 added online account opening for New England
residents.
Consistent with prudent interest rate risk
strategy and based upon the market and rate environment, we will consider holding in our portfolio longer term fixed-rate one-
to four-family residential mortgage loans. Historically, as part of our interest rate risk strategy, we have sold the majority
of our fixed-rate one- to four-family residential real estate loans with terms of greater than 15 years outside of our community
reinvestment act (CRA) area on a servicing-released basis. During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, we did not originate
any loans for sale and sold no fixed-rate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, including refinances, opting instead
to hold those fixed rate loans in our portfolio as part of our growth strategy.
From time to time commercial borrowers
will require loans in excess of the Bank’s lending limits, the Bank offers, and intends to offer in the future, such loans
on a participating basis with its correspondent bank or with other community banks, retaining the portion of such loans which
is within its lending limits. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the bank entered into a participation agreement for one
commercial real estate loan, participating out $1.4 million, or 55%, of the total loan balance.
Reflecting our focus on our community,
in connection with our mutual to stock conversion and stock offering which we consummated in October 2014, we established a charitable
foundation called Melrose Cooperative Bank Foundation and funded it with $300,000 in cash and 106,170 shares of our common stock
with a value of $1,061,700. The purpose of this foundation is to make contributions to support various charitable organizations
operating in our community now and in the future.
Our website address is
www.melrosebank.com
.
Information on this website should not be considered a part of this annual report.
Market Area
We conduct our operations from our full-service
banking office in Melrose, Massachusetts which is located in the greater Boston metropolitan area of Middlesex County. Melrose
is a suburb located approximately seven miles north of Boston. We consider our primary deposit area to be Melrose and the surrounding
towns and our primary lending market area to be Northeastern Massachusetts. While we occasionally make loans secured by properties
located outside of our primary lending market, these loans are generally to borrowers with whom we have an existing relationship
and who have a presence within our primary lending market.
The Boston metropolitan area benefits from
the presence of numerous institutions of higher learning, medical care and research centers and the corporate headquarters of several
significant mutual fund investment companies. Eastern Massachusetts also has many high technology companies employing personnel
with specialized skills. These factors affect the demand for residential homes, multifamily apartments, office buildings, shopping
centers, industrial warehouses and other commercial properties.
Based on the estimated 2017 United States
census, the Boston metropolitan area is the 10
th
largest metropolitan area in the United States. Located adjacent to
major transportation corridors, the Boston metropolitan area provides a highly diversified economic base, with major employment
sectors ranging from services, manufacturing and wholesale/retail trade, to finance, technology and medical care. According to
the United States Department of Labor, in November 2018, the Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, Massachusetts/New Hampshire Metropolitan
Statistical Area had an unemployment rate of 2.4% compared to the national unemployment rate of 3.5%.
Based on United States
census estimates, from April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2017, the population of Middlesex County increased marginally from
1.50 million persons to 1.60 million persons. In 2017 the median household income for Middlesex County was $92,878
compared to median household income for Massachusetts of $74,167 and $57,652 for the United States.
Competition
We face significant
competition within our market and elsewhere both in making loans and attracting deposits. Our market area has a high
concentration of financial institutions, including large money center and regional banks, community banks and credit unions.
Some of our competitors offer products and services that we currently do not offer, such as trust services and private
banking. Our competition for loans and deposits comes principally from commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage
banking firms, consumer finance companies and credit unions. We face additional competition for deposits from short-term
money market funds, brokerage firms, mutual funds and insurance companies.
We are a small community savings institution
and as of June 30, 2018 (the latest date for which information is available), our market share was 0.38% of total Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)-insured deposits in Middlesex County, Massachusetts making us the 36th largest out of 53 financial
institutions in Middlesex County.
Lending Activities
Our principal lending activity is originating
one- to four-family residential real estate loans and commercial real estate loans. To a lesser extent, we also originate home
equity lines of credit, construction loans and consumer loans. In recent years, we have modestly increased our commercial real
estate loans. Since December 31, 2016, our commercial real estate loans have increased $35.8 million, or 155.4%, and totaled $58.8
million, or 21.8% of our total loan portfolio, at December 31, 2018. Subject to market conditions and our asset-liability analysis,
we expect to continue to increase our focus on commercial real estate loans in an effort to diversify our overall loan portfolio
and increase the overall yield earned on our loans. Historically, we originated for sale and sold the majority of the fixed-rate
one- to four-family residential real estate loans that we originate with terms of greater than 15 years outside of our CRA area,
on a servicing-released, limited or no recourse basis, while retaining shorter-term fixed-rate and all adjustable-rate one- to
four-family residential real estate loans in order to manage the duration and time to repricing of our loan portfolio. There were
no one- to four-family residential loans sold during the year ended December 31, 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2018,
we entered into a participation agreement for one commercial real estate loan, participating out $1.4 million, or 55%, of
the total loan balance.
During 2017, no loans were originated for
sale or sold, instead the Bank purchased one- to four-family residential real estate loans from two well-established mortgage companies
in our local market. Prior to purchase the Bank underwrites the loans to ensure credit quality consistent with the Bank’s
lending policy, and reviews all closing documentation. Loans are purchased up to the Bank’s legal lending limit, for properties
located in Massachusetts and generally within our primary lending market. There were no one- to four-family residential loans purchased
during the year ended December 31, 2018. There was one commercial real estate participation loan, in which we are not the
lead bank, where we purchased $294,000, or 29.4%, of the loan balance from the participating institution.
Loan Portfolio Composition.
The following table sets
forth the composition of our loan portfolio at the dates indicated.
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four-family residential
|
|
$
|
186,287
|
|
|
|
69.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
189,763
|
|
|
|
75.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
168,111
|
|
|
|
78.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
132,237
|
|
|
|
82.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
118,144
|
|
|
|
87.9
|
%
|
Home equity loans and lines of credit
|
|
|
13,565
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
11,585
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
10,720
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
10,862
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
10,811
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
58,780
|
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
34,686
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
23,011
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
13,251
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Construction
(1)
|
|
|
10,441
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
15,853
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
11,738
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
4,303
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
2,787
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
269,111
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
251,931
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
213,651
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
160,774
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
134,350
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(1,323
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,134
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(890
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(580
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(520
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred loan costs, net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized premiums
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
$
|
268,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
251,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
213,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
160,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
133,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Net
of undisbursed proceeds on loans-in-process.
|
Loan Portfolio Maturities and Yields.
The following table summarizes the scheduled repayments of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2018. Demand loans,
loans having no stated repayment schedule or maturity, and overdraft loans are reported as being due in one year or less. Maturities
are based on the final contractual payment date and do not reflect the effect of prepayments and scheduled principal amortization.
|
|
One- to Four- Family Residential Loans
|
|
|
Home Equity Loans and Lines of Credit
|
|
|
Commercial Loans
|
|
|
Construction Loans
|
|
|
Consumer Loans
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Weighted Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Weighted Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Weighted Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Weighted Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Weighted Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Weighted Average Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Due During the Years Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
|
3.08
|
%
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
|
5.25
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,211
|
|
|
|
5.73
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,664
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
|
18.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,956
|
|
|
|
5.18
|
%
|
2020
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
3.48
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
|
|
4.88
|
|
|
|
3,777
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4.99
|
|
|
|
4,991
|
|
|
|
5.71
|
|
2021
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
3.04
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
5.25
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
3.16
|
|
2022 to 2023
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
|
|
3.20
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
5.29
|
|
|
|
2,372
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
5.21
|
|
|
|
4,608
|
|
|
|
3.72
|
|
2024 to 2028
|
|
|
14,759
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
2,326
|
|
|
|
4.82
|
|
|
|
47,910
|
|
|
|
4.43
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5.19
|
|
|
|
64,996
|
|
|
|
4.30
|
|
2029 to 2033
|
|
|
23,074
|
|
|
|
2.72
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
23,781
|
|
|
|
2.78
|
|
2034 and beyond
|
|
|
145,704
|
|
|
|
3.63
|
|
|
|
10,742
|
|
|
|
4.82
|
|
|
|
4,862
|
|
|
|
4.21
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
161,308
|
|
|
|
3.73
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
186,287
|
|
|
|
3.54
|
%
|
|
$
|
13,565
|
|
|
|
4.82
|
%
|
|
$
|
58,780
|
|
|
|
4.45
|
%
|
|
$
|
10,441
|
|
|
|
5.36
|
%
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
|
8.56
|
%
|
|
$
|
269,111
|
|
|
|
3.88
|
%
|
The following table sets forth our fixed-
and adjustable-rate loans at December 31, 2018 that are due after December 31, 2019.
|
|
Due After December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
|
Adjustable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four-family residential
|
|
$
|
81,065
|
|
|
$
|
105,164
|
|
|
$
|
186,229
|
|
Home equity loans and lines of credit
|
|
|
2,401
|
|
|
|
11,151
|
|
|
|
13,552
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
8,087
|
|
|
|
48,482
|
|
|
|
56,569
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,777
|
|
|
|
3,777
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
91,579
|
|
|
$
|
168,576
|
|
|
$
|
260,155
|
|
One-
to Four-Family Residential Real Estate Lending
. The focus of our lending is the origination of long-term loans secured
by mortgages on owner-occupied one- to four-family residences. At December 31, 2018, $186.3 million, or 69.3%, of our total
loan portfolio consisted of one- to four-family residential real estate loans. At that date, our average outstanding one- to four-family
residential real estate loan balance was $265,000 and our largest outstanding residential loan had a principal balance of $2.1
million. At December 31, 2018, our 10 largest one- to four-family residential loans totaled $11.8 million. The majority of
the one- to four-family residential real estate loans that we originate are secured by properties located in our primary lending
area of Melrose and the surrounding towns. See ” – Originations, Sales and Purchases of Loans.”
Our one- to four-family residential real
estate loans are generally underwritten according to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guidelines, and we refer to loans that conform
to such guidelines as “conforming loans.” We generally originate both fixed- and adjustable-rate one- to four- family
residential real estate loans in amounts up to the maximum conforming loan limits as established by the Federal Housing Finance
Agency (“FHFA”). We also originate loans above the FHFA limit, which are referred to as “jumbo loans.”
We generally underwrite jumbo loans in a manner similar to conforming loans. During the years ended December 31, 2018 and
2017, we originated $11.7 million and $22.9 million of jumbo loans, respectively.
We originate both fixed-rate and adjustable-rate
one- to four-family residential real estate loans. Our fixed-rate and adjustable-rate one- to four-family residential real estate
loans are originated with terms of up to 30 years. Prior to January 2014, we offered a 40-year adjustable rate loan product. At
December 31, 2018, $105.2 million, or 56.4%, of our one- to four-family residential real estate loans were adjustable-rate
loans.
We originate our adjustable-rate one- to
four-family residential real estate loans with initial interest rate adjustment periods of five, seven and 10 years, based on changes
in a designated market index. These loans are limited to a 200 basis point initial increase in their interest rate, a 200 basis
point increase in their interest rate annually after the initial adjustment, and a maximum upward adjustment of 600 basis points
over the life of the loan. We determine whether a borrower qualifies for an adjustable-rate mortgage loan based on secondary market
guidelines.
We originate one- to four-family residential
mortgage loans with loan-to-value ratios of up to 80% without private mortgage insurance. We originate loans with loan-to-value
ratios of up to 97% with private mortgage insurance and where the borrower’s monthly debt service does not exceed 45% of
the borrower’s monthly cash-flow.
Certain of our one- to four-family residential
real estate loans are for the purchase of residential condominiums. Consistent with our risk analysis, we will not finance more
than 15% of the units in any condominium project. In addition and consistent with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guidelines, generally,
we will not make a loan for the purchase of a condominium in a new condominium project unless at least 60% of the total units
in the project are sold or under a sales agreement prior to the loan closing.
We generally do not offer “interest
only” mortgage loans on one- to four-family residential real estate loans nor do we offer loans that provide for negative
amortization of principal, such as “Option ARM” loans, where the borrower can pay less than the interest owed on the
loan, resulting in an increased principal balance during the life of the loan. Additionally, we do not offer “subprime loans”
(loans that are made with low down-payments to borrowers with weakened credit histories typically characterized by payment delinquencies,
previous charge-offs, judgments, bankruptcies, or borrowers with questionable repayment capacity as evidenced by low credit scores
or high debt-burden ratios) or Alt-A loans (defined as loans having less than full documentation).
Although adjustable-rate mortgage loans
may reduce, to an extent, our vulnerability to changes in market interest rates because they periodically reprice, as interest
rates increase, the required payments due from the borrower also increase (subject to rate caps), increasing the potential for
default by the borrower. At the same time, the marketability of the underlying collateral may be adversely affected by higher interest
rates. Upward adjustments of the contractual interest rate are also limited by the maximum periodic and lifetime rate adjustments
permitted by our loan documents. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we originated 40 one-to-four family residential
real estate loans totaling $16.8 million with adjustable rates of interest.
We evaluate both the borrower’s ability
to make principal, interest and escrow payments and the value of the property that will secure the loan. Our one- to four-family
residential real estate loans do not currently include prepayment penalties, are non-assumable and do not produce negative amortization.
Our one- to four-family residential mortgage loans customarily include “due-on-sale” clauses giving us the right to
declare the loan immediately due and payable in the event that, among other things, the borrower sells the property subject to
the mortgage. All borrowers are required to obtain title insurance for the benefit of Melrose Bank. We also require homeowner’s
insurance and fire and casualty insurance and, where circumstances warrant, flood insurance on properties securing real estate
loans.
We offer on a limited basis one- to four-family
residential real estate loans secured by non-owner occupied properties. Generally, we require personal guarantees from the borrowers
on these properties, and we will not make loans in excess of 80% loan to value on non-owner-occupied properties.
Home Equity Lines of Credit
.
In addition to one- to four-family residential real estate loans, we offer home equity lines of credit that are secured by the
borrower’s primary or secondary residence. At December 31, 2018, we had $13.6 million, or 5.0%, of our total loan portfolio,
in home equity lines of credit, with $16.4 million of unused commitments related to these home equity lines of credit.
Home equity lines of credit are generally
underwritten using the same criteria that we use to underwrite one- to four-family residential real estate loans. Home equity lines
of credit may be underwritten with a loan-to-value ratio of up to 80% when combined with the principal balance of the existing
first mortgage loan. Our home equity lines of credit are originated with a fixed interest rate or an adjustable-rate that is based
on the prime rate of interest plus an applicable margin with a floor rate and require interest paid monthly.
Home equity lines of credit are generally
secured by junior mortgages and have greater risk than one- to four-family residential real estate loans secured by first mortgages.
We face the risk that the collateral will be insufficient to compensate us for loan losses and costs of foreclosure, after repayment
of the senior mortgages, if applicable. When customers default on their loans, we attempt to foreclose on the property and resell
the property as soon as possible to minimize foreclosure and carrying costs. However, the value of the collateral may not be sufficient
to compensate us for the amount of the unpaid loan and we may be unsuccessful in recovering the remaining balance from those customers.
Particularly with respect to our home equity lines of credit, decreases in real estate values could adversely affect our ability
to fully recover the loan balance in the event of a default.
Commercial Real Estate Lending
.
Consistent with our strategy to enhance the yield and reduce the term to maturity of our loan portfolio, we offer commercial real
estate loans. At December 31, 2018, we had $57.5 million in commercial real estate loans, representing 21.4% of our total
loan portfolio. In addition to commercial real estate loans, we offer commercial lines of credit that are secured by the real estate
investment properties. At December 31, 2018, we had $1.2 million, or 0.5%, of our total loan portfolio in commercial lines
of credit. At that date we also had $4.3 million of unused commitments related to commercial lines of credit. The majority of the
commercial real estate loans that we originate are secured by properties located in our primary lending area of Melrose and the
surrounding towns. See ” – Originations, Sales and Purchases of Loans.”
Generally, our permanent commercial real
estate loans have amortization periods up to 30 years if they are primarily secured by multi-family residences, or 25 years if
they are primarily secured by a property that is utilized for commercial business purposes. Generally these loans have adjustable
rates of interest tied to the FHLB Classic Advance Rate.
The majority of our commercial real estate
loans are secured by multifamily residential real estate, office buildings or mixed-use properties located in Middlesex County
and Suffolk County, Massachusetts.
We consider a number of factors in originating
commercial real estate loans. We evaluate the qualifications and financial condition of the borrower, including credit history,
profitability and expertise, as well as the value and condition of the property securing the loan. When evaluating the qualifications
of the borrower, we consider the financial resources of the borrower, the borrower’s experience in owning or managing similar
property and the borrower’s payment history with us and other financial institutions. In evaluating the property securing
the loan, the factors we consider include the net operating income of the mortgaged property before debt service and depreciation,
the ratio of the loan amount to the appraised value of the mortgaged property and the debt service coverage ratio (the ratio of
net operating income to debt service, generally at least 1.25 to 1). All commercial real estate loans are appraised by outside
independent appraisers who are approved by the board of directors on an annual basis. Personal guarantees are generally obtained
from the principals of commercial and multifamily real estate loans.
Commercial real estate loans entail greater
credit risks compared to owner-occupied one- to four-family residential real estate loans because they typically involve larger
loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. In addition, the payment of loans secured by income-producing
properties typically depends on the successful operation of the property, as repayment of the loan generally is dependent, in large
part, on sufficient income from the property to cover operating expenses and debt service. Changes in economic conditions that
are not in the control of the borrower or lender could affect the value of the collateral for the loan or the future cash flow
of the property. Additionally, any decline in real estate values may be more pronounced for commercial real estate than residential
properties.
Our regulatory limit on loans-to-one borrower
was $5.6 million at December 31, 2018. We generally target commercial real estate loans with balances of up to the lesser
of $4.5 million or our legal lending limit. At December 31, 2018, our average outstanding commercial real estate loan balance
was $899,000 and our largest outstanding commercial real estate loan had a principal balance of $4.8 million. At December 31,
2018, our 10 largest loans totaled $18.4 million, all of which were commercial real estate loans.
Construction Loans
. We also
originate construction loans for one- to four-family residential real estate properties and commercial properties. At December 31,
2018, $10.4 million, or 3.9% of our total loan portfolio, consisted of construction loans secured by one- to four-family residential
real estate or commercial real estate.
Our construction loans are primarily secured
by properties located within our primary market area. We generally do not originate speculative construction loans to contractors
and builders to finance the construction and rehabilitation of residential or commercial properties.
Construction loans for one- to four-family
residential real estate properties are generally originated with adjustable rates and a maximum loan to value ratio of 80%. Construction
loans for commercial real estate are originated with a maximum loan to value ratio of 75%. At December 31, 2018, our largest
construction loan had a principal balance of $1.4 million and was secured by commercial real estate in our market area. This loan
was performing in accordance with its repayment terms at December 31, 2018.
Construction loans are “interest-only”
loans during the construction period which typically does not exceed 12 months and may convert to permanent, amortizing financing
following the completion of construction. Depending on the complexity of the construction project, the term of an “interest-only”
construction loan may be extended up to an additional 12 months. At December 31, 2018, the additional un-advanced portions
of these construction loans totaled $4.2 million.
We make construction loans for commercial
properties, including commercial “mixed-use” buildings. Advances on construction loans are made in accordance with
a schedule reflecting the cost of construction, but are generally limited to a 75% loan-to-completed-appraised-value ratio. Repayment
of construction loans on residential properties is normally expected from the property’s eventual rental income, income from
the borrower’s operating entity, the personal resources of the guarantor, or the sale of the subject property. In the case
of income-producing property, repayment is usually expected from permanent financing upon completion of construction. We typically
provide the permanent mortgage financing on our construction loans on income-producing properties and owner-occupied properties.
Generally, before making a commitment
to fund a construction loan, we require an appraisal of the property by a state-certified or state-licensed appraiser. We review
and inspect properties before disbursement of funds during the term of the construction loan.
Construction financing generally involves
greater credit risk than long-term financing on improved, owner-occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends
largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the value of the property at completion of construction compared to the estimated
cost (including interest) of construction and other assumptions. If the estimate of construction cost is inaccurate, we may be
required to advance additional funds beyond the amount originally committed in order to protect the value of the property. Moreover,
if the estimated value of the completed project is inaccurate, the borrower may hold a property with a value that is insufficient
to assure full repayment of the construction loan upon the sale of the property. In the event we make a land acquisition loan on
property that is not yet approved for the planned development, there is the risk that approvals will not be granted or will be
delayed. Construction loans also expose us to the risk that improvements will not be completed on time in accordance with specifications
and projected costs. In addition, the ultimate sale or rental of the property may not occur as anticipated.
Consumer Lending
. To a much
lesser extent, we offer a variety of consumer loans to individuals who reside or work in our market area, including new and used
automobile loans, unsecured overdraft lines of credit and loans secured by passbook accounts. At December 31, 2018, our consumer
loan portfolio totaled $38,000.
Consumer loans generally have shorter terms
to maturity, which reduces our exposure to changes in interest rates. In addition, management believes that offering consumer loan
products helps to expand and create stronger ties to our existing customer base by increasing the number of customer relationships
and providing cross-marketing opportunities.
Consumer loans generally have greater risk
compared to longer-term loans secured by improved, owner-occupied real estate, particularly consumer loans that are secured by
rapidly depreciable assets, such as automobiles. In these cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted loan may not provide
an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance. As a result, consumer loan collections are primarily dependent
on the borrower’s continuing financial stability and thus are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce,
illness or personal bankruptcy.
Originations, Sales and Purchases of Loans
Our loan originations are generated by
our loan personnel operating at our banking office. All loans we originate are underwritten pursuant to our policies and procedures.
While we originate both fixed-rate and adjustable-rate loans, our ability to generate each type of loan depends upon relative borrower
demand and the pricing levels as set in the local marketplace by competing banks, thrifts, credit unions, and mortgage banking
companies. Our volume of real estate loan originations is influenced significantly by market interest rates, and, accordingly,
the volume of our real estate loan originations can vary from period to period.
In the low interest rate environment that
has existed in recent years, we generally originated for sale and sold the majority of the fixed-rate, one- to four-family residential
real estate loans that we originate with terms of greater than 15 years outside of our CRA area, on a servicing-released, limited
or no recourse basis, while retaining shorter-term fixed-rate and all adjustable-rate one- to four-family residential real estate
loans in order to manage the duration and time to repricing of our loan portfolio. We consider our balance sheet as well as market
conditions on an ongoing basis in making decisions as to whether to hold loans we originate for investment or to sell such loans
to investors, choosing the strategy that is most advantageous to us from a profitability and risk management standpoint. For the
year ended December 31, 2018, we did not sell any one- to four-family residential real estate loans, and based on our current
strategy we opted to hold for investment all long term fixed-rate loans we originated in 2018.
From time to time, we may purchase loan
participations secured by properties within and outside of our primary lending market area in which we are not the lead lender.
In these circumstances, we follow our customary loan underwriting and approval policies. During the year ended December 31, 2018,
the Bank purchased one participation loan totaling $294,000. At December 31, 2018, we had a total of seven participation loans
purchased, and our outstanding balance amounted to $4.6 million. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Bank purchased two
participation loans totaling $3.5 million. At December 31, 2017, we had a total of seven participation loans purchased, and
our outstanding balance amounted to $6.7 million. We may participate out portions of a loan that exceed our loans-to-one borrower
legal lending limit and for risk diversification.
At December 31, 2018, we had two commercial
real estate loan participations in which we were the lead bank, with an outstanding balance of $5.3 million, of which we own $3.0
million and sold the remaining $2.3 million. At December 31, 2017, we had one commercial real estate loan participation in which
we were the lead bank, with an outstanding balance of $2.8 million, of which we own $1.8 million and sold the remaining $1.0 million.
The following table shows our loan originations,
purchases, and principal repayment activities during the years indicated. During 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015 the Bank did not originate
for sale or sell any loans. During 2014 we originated for sale and sold $1.8 million, of loans held-for-sale. These loans are not
included in the table.
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
251,931
|
|
|
$
|
213,651
|
|
|
$
|
160,774
|
|
|
$
|
134,350
|
|
|
$
|
132,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans originated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four-family residential
|
|
|
27,998
|
|
|
|
29,117
|
|
|
|
30,877
|
|
|
|
30,809
|
|
|
|
19,847
|
|
Home equity loans and lines of credit
|
|
|
2,307
|
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
1,598
|
|
|
|
1,853
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
12,550
|
|
|
|
11,285
|
|
|
|
11,811
|
|
|
|
9,625
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Commercial lines of credit
|
|
|
4,791
|
|
|
|
1,870
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
7,867
|
|
|
|
7,564
|
|
|
|
6,752
|
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
|
|
2,040
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
Total loans originated
|
|
|
55,540
|
|
|
|
51,059
|
|
|
|
51,057
|
|
|
|
45,389
|
|
|
|
22,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans purchased:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four-family residential
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19,496
|
|
|
|
31,400
|
|
|
|
2,835
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
3,100
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
(48,950
|
)
|
|
|
(45,715
|
)
|
|
|
(39,859
|
)
|
|
|
(29,863
|
)
|
|
|
(30,195
|
)
|
Advances on construction and home equity
lines of credit
|
|
|
10,296
|
|
|
|
9,940
|
|
|
|
7,179
|
|
|
|
8,063
|
|
|
|
9,465
|
|
Net loan activity
|
|
|
17,180
|
|
|
|
38,280
|
|
|
|
52,877
|
|
|
|
26,424
|
|
|
|
1,941
|
|
Total loans at end of period
|
|
$
|
269,111
|
|
|
$
|
251,931
|
|
|
$
|
213,651
|
|
|
$
|
160,774
|
|
|
$
|
134,350
|
|
Loan Approval Procedures and Authority
The maximum amount that we may lend to
one borrower and the borrower’s related entities is generally limited, by statute, to 15% of our capital, in accordance with
the FDIC regulations, undivided profits and, after the completion of the conversion, capital stock. Loans secured by a first mortgage
on residential property occupied by the borrower are excluded from this limit. At December 31, 2018, our regulatory limit
on loans-to-one borrower was $5.6 million. However, we maintain an internal loans-to-one borrower limit that is below the regulatory
limit. At December 31, 2018, our internal limit was $4.0 million, but exceptions to this limit can be approved by the Bank’s
Security Committee and/or Board of Directors. At December 31, 2018, our largest lending relationship consisted of one loan
totaling $4.8 million secured by commercial real estate in our market area. This loan relationship was approved as an exception
to the Bank’s policy prior to funding and performing in accordance with its original repayment terms at December 31,
2018. Our second largest relationship at this date consisted of three loans totaling $4.7 million secured by commercial real estate
in our market area that were performing in accordance with their terms.
Our lending is subject to written underwriting
standards and origination procedures. Decisions on loan applications are made on the basis of detailed applications submitted by
the prospective borrower and property valuations (consistent with our appraisal policy) prepared by outside independent licensed
or certified appraisers approved by our board of directors as well as internal evaluations, where permitted by regulations. The
loan applications are designed primarily to determine the borrower’s ability to repay the requested loan, and the more significant
items on the application are verified through use of credit reports, financial statements and tax returns.
The board of directors has overall responsibility
for our lending policy, and the board reviews this policy at least annually. The Security Committee of the board of directors is
comprised of between three and five members of the board. The Bank has also established a Loan Committee comprised of the President,
Senior Vice President-Chief Lending Officer, Senior Vice President – Treasurer, and the Vice President – Head of Commercial
Lending. All loans require ratification of the board of directors at a regularly scheduled meeting.
The Bank’s policies and loan
approval limits for one- to four-family residential real estate loans which are established by the board of directors provide
various lending approval authorities for other designated individual employees up to current Fannie Mae maximum loan limits.
Loan requests for one- to four-family residential loans above the Fannie Mae maximum, but not exceeding $1.0 million, must
be approved by two authorized individuals. Loan requests for one- to four-family residential loans exceeding $1.0 million,
but less than $1.5 million, require approval by one of the authorized individuals plus the Loan Committee. Loan requests for
one- to four-family residential loans exceeding $1.5 million require approval by one of the authorized individuals plus the
Security Committee. Additionally, any loans that do not conform to the Bank’s usual underwriting criteria require the
approval by the Security Committee or by the Senior Vice President-Chief Lending Officer and the President.
Our Senior Vice President-Chief Lending
Officer and Vice President-Head of Commercial Lending may approve commercial loans up to $500,000 in total relationship exposure
on a joint approval basis. Either individual may designate his or her authority on a short term basis to the President of the Bank
in their absence. The Loan Committee, comprised of the President, Chief Lending Officer and the Senior Vice President-Treasurer,
will be responsible for approving loan requests risk rated from one to six to new or existing borrowers with total credit exposure
of greater than $500,000, but less than $1,500,000, as well as any loans risk rated from one to six to new or existing borrowers
that carry a material policy exception with total exposure greater than $250,000. Loan requests with risk ratings from one to six
to new or existing borrowers with total credit exposure of greater than $1.5 million will require security committee approval.
Generally, we require title insurance on
our mortgage loans as well as fire and extended coverage casualty insurance in amounts at least equal to the principal amount of
the loan or the value of improvements on the property, depending on the type of loan. We also require flood insurance if the improved
property is determined to be in a flood zone area.
Delinquencies and Non-Performing Assets
Delinquency Procedures
.
When
a borrower fails to make required payments on a loan, we take a number of steps to induce the borrower to cure the delinquency
and restore the loan to current status. We generally send a written notice of non-payment to the borrower 15, 30, 60 and 90 days
after a loan is first past due. We will additionally try to contact the borrower by telephone after the 30th day after the due
date.
Generally, when a loan becomes 90 days
past due, the loan is turned over to our attorneys to ensure that further collection activities are conducted in accordance with
applicable laws and regulations. All loans past due 90 days are put on non-accrual and reported to the board of directors monthly.
If our attorneys do not receive a response from the borrower, or if the terms of any payment plan established are not followed,
then foreclosure proceedings will be implemented. Management submits a delinquent loan report detailing loans 30 days or more past
due to the board of directors on a monthly basis.
When we acquire real estate as a result
of foreclosure or by deed in lieu of foreclosure, the real estate is classified as foreclosed real estate until it is sold. The
real estate is recorded at estimated fair value at the date of acquisition less estimated costs to sell, and any write-down resulting
from the acquisition is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Estimated fair value is based on an appraisal typically obtained
before the foreclosure process is completed. Subsequent decreases in the value of the property are charged to operations. After
acquisition, all costs incurred in maintaining the property are expensed. Costs relating to the development and improvement of
the property, however, are capitalized to the extent of estimated fair value less estimated costs to sell.
Delinquent Loans
. The following
table sets forth certain information with respect to our loan portfolio delinquencies by type and amount at the periods indicated.
|
|
Loans Delinquent For
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30-89 Days
|
|
|
90 Days and Over
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
At December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four-family residential
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
714
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
714
|
|
Home equity loans and lines of credit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
714
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four-family residential
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
472
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
472
|
|
Home equity loans and lines of credit
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four-family residential
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
527
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
527
|
|
Home equity loans and lines of credit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
527
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four-family residential
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
600
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
668
|
|
Home equity loans and lines of credit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
600
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
265
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four-family residential
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
939
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
1,052
|
|
Home equity loans and lines of credit
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Total
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
1,138
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
1,255
|
|
Nonperforming Assets.
The table below sets forth
the amounts and categories of our nonperforming assets at the dates indicated.
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Nonaccrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
$
|
348
|
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
421
|
|
Home equity loans and lines of credit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total non-accrual loans
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans delinquent 90 days or greater and still accruing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Home equity loans and lines of credit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total loans delinquent 90 days or greater and still accruing
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
Other real estate owned and foreclosed assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Home equity loans and lines of credit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total real estate owned and foreclosed assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing troubled debt restructurings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total non-performing assets and performing troubled debt restructurings
|
|
$
|
348
|
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
265
|
|
|
$
|
623
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans
|
|
|
0.13
|
%
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.16
|
%
|
|
|
0.46
|
%
|
Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
|
|
0.09
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
|
|
0.29
|
%
|
For the year ended December 31, 2018,
gross interest income that would have been recorded had our non-accruing loans been current in accordance with their original
terms was $1,000. For the year ended December 31, 2017, gross interest income that would have been recorded had our non-accruing
loans been current in accordance with their original terms was $1,000.
Non-Performing Loans
. At
December 31, 2018, we had two loans secured by one- to four-family residential real estate totaling $348,000 that were on
non-accrual status.
We generally cease accruing interest on
our loans when contractual payments of principal or interest have become 90 days past due or management has serious doubts about
further collectability of principal or interest, even though the loan is currently performing. A loan may remain on accrual status
if it is in the process of collection and is either guaranteed or well secured. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, unpaid
interest credited to income is reversed. Interest received on nonaccrual loans is applied against principal and is recognized on
a cash basis. Generally, loans are restored to accrual status when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance
with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and
interest is no longer in doubt.
Troubled Debt
Restructurings
. Loans are classified as troubled debt restructurings when certain modifications are made to the loan
terms and concessions are granted to the borrowers due to financial difficulty experienced by those borrowers. The
modification of the terms of such loans would generally be one of the following: a reduction of the stated interest rate of
the loan for some period of time, an extension of the maturity date at a stated rate of interest lower than the current
market rate for new debt with similar risk, or an extension of time to make payments with the delinquent payments added to
the principal of the loan. We had no troubled debt restructurings during the year ended December 31, 2018, and there was one
troubled debt restructuring during the year ended December 31, 2017 totaling $100,000.
Classified Assets.
Federal
regulations provide that each insured savings institution classify its assets on a regular basis. In addition, in connection with
examination of insured institutions, federal and Massachusetts banking regulators have authority to identify problem assets and,
if appropriate, classify them. There are three classifications for problem assets: “substandard,” “doubtful”
or “loss.” An asset is considered “substandard” if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth
and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. “Substandard” assets include those characterized
by the “distinct possibility” that the insured institution will sustain “some loss” if the deficiencies
are not corrected. Assets classified as “doubtful” have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified “substandard,”
with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make “collection or liquidation in full,” on the basis of
currently existing facts, conditions, and values, “highly questionable and improbable.” Assets classified as “loss”
are those considered “uncollectible” and of such little value that their continuance as assets without the establishment
of a specific loss reserve or charge-off is not warranted. Assets which do not currently expose the insured institution to sufficient
risk to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories but possess weaknesses are designated as “special
mention” by our management.
When an insured institution classifies
problem assets as either substandard or doubtful, it may establish general allowances in an amount deemed prudent by management
to cover probable accrued losses. General allowances represent loss allowances which have been established to cover probable accrued
losses associated with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances, have not been allocated to particular problem
assets. When an insured institution classifies problem assets as “loss,” it is required either to establish a specific
allowance for losses equal to 100% of that portion of the asset so classified or to charge-off such amount. An institution’s
determination as to the classification of its assets and the amount of its valuation allowances is subject to review by the regulatory
agencies, which may require the establishment of additional general or specific loss allowances.
In accordance with our loan policy, we
regularly review the problem loans in our portfolio to determine whether any loans require classification in accordance with applicable
regulations. Loans are listed on the “watch list” initially because of emerging financial weaknesses even though the
loan is currently performing as agreed, or delinquency status, or if the loan possesses weaknesses although currently performing.
If a loan deteriorates in asset quality, the classification is changed to “special mention,” “substandard,”
“doubtful” or “loss” depending on the circumstances and the evaluation. Generally, loans 90 days or more
past due are placed on nonaccrual status and classified “substandard.” Management reviews the status of each loan on
our delinquency report on a monthly basis.
The following table sets forth our amounts of classified assets
and assets designated as special mention at the dates indicated.
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Classified Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard
(1)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
563
|
|
|
$
|
596
|
|
Doubtful
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total classified assets
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
563
|
|
|
$
|
596
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
(1)
|
As
of December 31, 2018, the two non-accrual loans totaling $348,000 were not classified because management expects full payment
of principal and interest. As of December 31, 2017 the one non-accrual loan totaling $189,000 was not classified because
management expected full payment of principal and interest. As of December 31, 2016 the one non-accrual loan totaling $9,000
was not classified because management expected full payment of principal and interest. As of December 31, 2015 all non-accrual
loans were classified. As of December 31, 2014, one non-accrual loan totaling $27,000 was not classified because management
expected full payment of principal and interest.
|
Other Loans of Concern
. There
were no other loans at December 31, 2018 that are not already disclosed where there is information about possible credit problems
of borrowers that caused management to have serious doubts about the ability of the borrowers to comply with present loan repayment
terms and that may result in disclosure of such loans in the future.
Allowance
for Loan Losses
. We maintain the allowance through provisions for loan losses that we charge to income. We charge losses
on loans against the allowance for loan losses when we believe the collection of loan principal is unlikely. Recoveries on loans
charged-off are restored to the allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level believed, to
the best of management’s knowledge, to cover all known and inherent losses in the portfolio both probable and reasonable
to estimate at each reporting date. The level of allowance for loan losses is based on management’s periodic review of the
collectability of the loans principally in light of our historical experience, augmented by the nature and volume of the loan
portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral
and current and anticipated economic conditions in the primary lending area. We evaluate our allowance for loan losses quarterly.
We did not make any changes to our policies or methodology pertaining to the general
, allocated, or unallocated components
of
our
allowance for loan losses during 2018. We will continue to monitor all items involved in the allowance calculation closely.
We recorded provisions for loan losses
of $189,000 and $245,000 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The allowance for loan losses was $1.3
million, or 0.5% of total loans, at December 31, 2018, compared to $1.1 million, or 0.5% of total loans, at December 31,
2017. At these dates, the level of our allowance reflects management’s view of the risks inherent in the loan portfolio.
Although we believe that we use the best
information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary
and results of operations could be adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making
the determinations. Because future events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot be predicted with certainty, the existing allowance
for loan losses may not be adequate and management may determine that increases in the allowance are necessary if the quality of
any portion of our loan portfolio deteriorates as a result. Furthermore, as an integral part of its examination process, the Massachusetts
Division of Banks and the FDIC periodically review our allowance for loan losses. The Massachusetts Division of Banks and/or the
FDIC may require that we increase our allowance based on its judgments of information available to it at the time of its examination.
Any material increase in the allowance for loan losses may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Consistent with our business strategy,
we have increased our originations of commercial real estate loans. These types of loans generally bear higher risk than our one-
to four-family residential real estate loans. Accordingly, we would expect to increase our allowance for loans losses in the future
as the balance of these types of loans increase in our portfolio.
Allowance for Loan Losses
.
The following table sets forth activity in our allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated.
|
|
At
or For the Years Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning
of period
|
|
$
|
1,134
|
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
|
$
|
580
|
|
|
$
|
520
|
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four-family
residential
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Home equity loans
and lines of credit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
charge-offs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four-family
residential
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Home equity loans
and lines of credit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
recoveries
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (charge-offs)
recoveries
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Provision for
loan losses
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,323
|
|
|
$
|
1,134
|
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
|
$
|
580
|
|
|
$
|
520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(charge-offs) recoveries as a percentage of average loans standing
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for loan losses as a percentage of non-performing loans at period end
|
|
|
380.17
|
%
|
|
|
600.00
|
%
|
|
|
9,888.89
|
%
|
|
|
218.87
|
%
|
|
|
83.47
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for loan losses as a percentage of total loans receivable at period end
(1)
|
|
|
0.49
|
%
|
|
|
0.45
|
%
|
|
|
0.42
|
%
|
|
|
0.36
|
%
|
|
|
0.39
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Total
loans does not include net deferred loan costs.
|
Allocation of Allowance for Loan
Losses
. The following table sets forth the allowance for loan losses allocated by loan category and the percent of loans
in each category to total loans at the dates indicated. The allowance for loan losses allocated to each category is not necessarily
indicative of future losses in any particular category and does not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in other
categories.
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
Loan Losses
|
|
|
Percent of
Loans in Each
Category to
Total Loans
|
|
|
Allowance for
Loan Losses
|
|
|
Percent of
Loans in Each
Category to
Total Loans
|
|
|
Allowance for
Loan Losses
|
|
|
Percent of
Loans in Each
Category to
Total Loans
|
|
|
Allowance for
Loan Losses
|
|
|
Percent of
Loans in Each
Category to
Total Loans
|
|
|
Allowance for
Loan Losses
|
|
|
Percent of
Loans in Each
Category to
Total Loans
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Allocated allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
$
|
465
|
|
|
|
69.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
481
|
|
|
|
75.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
418
|
|
|
|
78.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
331
|
|
|
|
82.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
414
|
|
|
|
87.9
|
%
|
Home equity loans and lines of credit
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Total allocated allowance
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,113
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Unallocated allowance
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
520
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Activities
General
. Our investment policy
is established by the board of directors. The objectives of the policy are to: (i) provide and maintain liquidity within the
guidelines of the Massachusetts banking laws and regulations for loan demand and deposit fluctuations, and to allow us to alter
our liquidity position to meet both day-to-day and long-term changes in assets and liabilities; (ii) manage interest rate
risk in accordance with our interest rate risk policy; (iii) provide collateral for pledging requirements; (iv) maximize
return on our investments; and (v) maintain a balance of high quality diversified investments to minimize risk.
We have legal authority to invest in various
types of liquid assets, including U.S. Treasury obligations, securities of various government-sponsored enterprises and municipal
governments, certificates of deposit of federally insured institutions, investment grade corporate bonds and investment grade marketable
equity securities. We also are required to maintain an investment in Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock. While we have the
authority under applicable law to invest in derivative securities, we have not invested in derivative securities.
At December 31, 2018, our investment
portfolio consisted primarily of corporate debt securities, U.S. government and federal agency obligations, preferred stock, mortgage-backed
securities, asset-backed securities, municipal obligations and marketable equity securities.
Our investment policy is reviewed annually
by our board of directors and all policy changes recommended by management must be approved by the board. Authority to make investments
under the approved guidelines are delegated to appropriate officers. While general investment strategies are developed and authorized
by the board, the execution of specific actions with respect to securities held by Melrose Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary, rests
with the President and Chief Executive Officer within the scope of the established investment policy.
We utilize an independent financial institution
to provide us with portfolio accounting services, including a monthly portfolio performance analysis of our securities portfolio.
These reports are reviewed by management in making investment decisions. The Asset/Liability Committee, comprised of senior management
and one outside board member, reviews a summary of these reports on a quarterly basis.
At the time of purchase, we designate a
security as held-to-maturity or available-for-sale depending on our ability and intent. Securities available-for-sale are reported
at fair value, while securities held to maturity are reported at amortized cost. All of our securities are currently classified
as available-for-sale. Some of our securities are callable by the issuer or contain other features of financial engineering. Although
these securities may have a yield somewhat higher than the yield of similar securities without such features, these securities
are subject to the risk that they may be redeemed by the issuer prior to maturing in the event general interest rates decline.
At December 31, 2018, we had $13.9 million of securities which were subject to redemption by the issuer prior to their stated
maturity.
We review equity and debt securities with
significant declines in fair value on a periodic basis to determine whether they should be considered temporarily or other than
temporarily impaired. In making these determinations, management considers: (1) the length of time and extent that fair value
has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the market decline
was affected by macroeconomic conditions, and (4) our intent not to sell the security and whether it is more likely than not
that we will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. For any debt security with a fair value less
than its amortized cost basis, the Company will determine whether it has the intent to sell the debt security or whether it is
more likely than not it will be required to sell the debt security before the recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either condition
is met, the Company will recognize a full impairment charge to earnings. If a decline in the fair value of a debt security is determined
to be other than temporary, the amount of impairment is split into two components as follows: (1) other than temporary impairment
related to credit loss, which must be recognized in the income statement and (2) other than temporary impairment related to
other factors, which is recognized in other comprehensive loss. The credit loss is defined as the difference between the present
value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis.
During 2018 and 2017, there were no securities
declared other-than-temporarily impaired.
At December 31, 2018, our corporate
bond portfolio consisted of investment grade securities with maturities generally shorter than five years. Our investment policy
provides that we may invest up to 15% of our tier-one risk-based capital in corporate bonds from individual issuers which, at the
time of purchase, are within the three highest investment-grade ratings from Standard & Poor’s or Moody’s.
The maturity of these bonds may not exceed 10 years, and there is no aggregate limit for this security type. Corporate bonds from
individual issuers with investment-grade ratings, at the time of purchase, below the top three ratings are limited to the lesser
of 1% of our total assets or 15% of our tier-one risk-based capital and must have a maturity of less than one year. Aggregate holdings
of this security type cannot exceed 5% of our total assets. Bonds that subsequently experience a decline in credit rating below
investment grade are monitored at least quarterly.
In 2017, the Bank changed its investment
strategy in regard to marketable equity securities based on the January 2016, Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting
Standard Update (ASU) 2016-01, Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities. The amendments in this ASU address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation,
and disclosure of financial instruments to include a requirement that equity investments (except those accounted for under the
equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of investee) be measured at fair value with changes in fair value
recognized in net income effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. In January 2016, at the time the ASU was
issued, the Bank had two equity investments with Vanguard, with a fair-value of $4.9 million, and unrealized holding gains of $2.1
million. At this time, based on the current gain position, the Bank decided to sell off all shares of the Vanguard equity investments
evenly over a three year period ending in November 2018, prior to the effective date of ASU 2016-01. During the year ended December
31, 2018, 9,266 shares of Vanguard stock were sold, proceeds from the sale were $860,000, and realized gains on the sale were $508,000.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, 27,840 shares of Vanguard stock were sold, proceeds from the sale were $2.6 million, and
realized gains on the sale were $1.4 million.
Securities Portfolio.
The
following table sets forth the composition of our investment securities portfolio at the dates indicated. At the dates presented,
all investment securities were classified as available-for-sale.
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
Basis
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
Basis
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
Basis
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Securities available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agency obligations
|
|
$
|
4,026
|
|
|
$
|
3,960
|
|
|
$
|
5,390
|
|
|
$
|
5,325
|
|
|
$
|
5,819
|
|
|
$
|
5,688
|
|
Debt securities issued by states of the United
States and political subdivisions of the states
|
|
|
2,625
|
|
|
|
2,597
|
|
|
|
2,898
|
|
|
|
2,881
|
|
|
|
2,695
|
|
|
|
2,656
|
|
Corporate bonds and notes
|
|
|
13,791
|
|
|
|
13,595
|
|
|
|
11,364
|
|
|
|
11,294
|
|
|
|
12,537
|
|
|
|
12,493
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
1,876
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,013
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
2,938
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
1,159
|
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
|
1,432
|
|
Total debt securities
|
|
|
24,617
|
|
|
|
24,119
|
|
|
|
24,147
|
|
|
|
23,961
|
|
|
|
25,549
|
|
|
|
25,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term bonds
|
|
|
1,719
|
|
|
|
1,715
|
|
|
|
1,683
|
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
|
|
3,517
|
|
|
|
3,520
|
|
Stock market index funds
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
1,555
|
|
|
|
3,104
|
|
Total marketable equity securities
|
|
|
1,719
|
|
|
|
1,715
|
|
|
|
2,046
|
|
|
|
2,535
|
|
|
|
5,072
|
|
|
|
6,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
26,336
|
|
|
$
|
25,834
|
|
|
$
|
26,193
|
|
|
$
|
26,496
|
|
|
$
|
30,621
|
|
|
$
|
31,831
|
|
Securities Portfolio Maturities
and Yields
. The composition and maturities of the debt securities portfolio, excluding our marketable equity securities
and preferred stock without maturities, at December 31, 2018 are summarized in the following table. Maturities are based
on the final contractual payment dates, and do not reflect scheduled amortization or the impact of prepayments or redemptions
that may occur.
|
|
One Year or Less
|
|
|
More than One Year through Five Years
|
|
|
More than Five Years through Ten Years
|
|
|
More than Ten Years
|
|
|
Total Debt Securities
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
Basis
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
Basis
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
Basis
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
Basis
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
Basis
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Securities available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agency obligations
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
1.52
|
%
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,026
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,026
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
%
|
Debt securities issued by states of the United
States and political subdivisions of the states
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
|
|
1,638
|
|
|
|
2.95
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
|
|
2,625
|
|
|
|
3.07
|
|
Corporate bonds and notes
|
|
|
1,999
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
11,792
|
|
|
|
2.79
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13,791
|
|
|
|
2.44
|
|
Preferred stock with maturities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
3.96
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
3.99
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
3.21
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
4.04
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
7.25
|
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
2.72
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
3.60
|
|
Total
(1)
|
|
$
|
2,254
|
|
|
|
2.23
|
%
|
|
$
|
16,503
|
|
|
|
2.60
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,326
|
|
|
|
3.43
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,534
|
|
|
|
3.33
|
%
|
|
$
|
23,617
|
|
|
|
2.63
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Not
included in the above table is a preferred stock classified as a debt security that has no stated maturity, an amortized cost
basis of $1.0 million, a fair value of $878,000 and a yield of 5.20%.
|
Bank-Owned Life Insurance
.
We invest in bank-owned life insurance to provide us with a funding source for our benefit plan obligations. Bank-owned life insurance
also generally provides us noninterest income that is non-taxable. Applicable regulations generally limit our investment in bank-owned
life insurance to 25% of our Tier 1 capital plus our allowance for loan losses. At December 31, 2018, we had $6.3 million
in bank-owned life insurance.
Sources of Funds
General.
Deposits have traditionally
been our primary source of funds for use in lending and investment activities. During 2018 and 2017 the Bank borrowed $10.0 million
and $19.0 million, respectively, from the FHLB. Borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2018 consist of eight fixed rate advances,
four with a balance of $5.0 million, two with a balance of $4.0 million, and two with balances of $3.0 million, at interest rates
ranging from 1.42% to 2.78%, all with terms of three years. In addition, we receive funds from scheduled loan payments, loan prepayments,
retained earnings and income on earning assets. While scheduled loan payments and income on earning assets are relatively stable
sources of funds, deposit inflows and outflows can vary widely and are influenced by prevailing interest rates, market conditions
and levels of competition.
Deposits.
Our deposits are generated primarily from residents within our primary market area. We offer a selection of deposit accounts,
including noninterest-bearing demand accounts, money market accounts, savings accounts, NOW accounts and certificates of deposit.
The bank is also offering certificates of deposit through the listing service, QwickRate, an online marketplace for non-brokered
funding and investing that provides community financial institutions access to certificate of deposits market in the United States.
Deposit account terms vary, with the principal differences being the
minimum balance required, the amount of time the funds must remain on deposit and the interest rate. We have not in the past used,
and currently do not hold, any brokered deposits. At December 31, 2018, our core deposits, which are deposits other than
certificates of deposit, were $112.4 million, representing 46.07% of total deposits.
Interest rates, maturity terms, service
fees and withdrawal penalties are established on a periodic basis. Deposit rates and terms are based primarily on current operating
strategies and market rates, liquidity requirements, rates paid by competitors and growth goals. The flow of deposits is influenced
significantly by general economic conditions, changes in interest rates and competition. The variety of deposit accounts that we
offer allows us to be competitive in generating deposits and to respond with flexibility to changes in our customers’ demands.
Our ability to gather deposits is impacted by the competitive market in which we operate, which includes numerous financial institutions
of varying sizes offering a wide range of products. We believe that deposits are a stable source of funds, but our ability to attract
and maintain deposits at favorable rates will be affected by market conditions, including competition and prevailing interest rates.
The following tables set forth the distribution of total deposit
accounts, by account type, for the periods indicated.
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Rate
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Rate
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Deposit Type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits
|
|
$
|
17,565
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
|
$
|
17,147
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
|
$
|
16,280
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
32,910
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
33,584
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
32,750
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
126,989
|
|
|
|
54.2
|
|
|
|
1.81
|
|
|
|
120,372
|
|
|
|
54.0
|
|
|
|
1.34
|
|
|
|
106,624
|
|
|
|
51.9
|
|
|
|
1.31
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
|
37,646
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
37,402
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
35,731
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
NOW accounts
|
|
|
19,044
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
14,413
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
13,960
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
234,154
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
1.17
|
%
|
|
$
|
222,918
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.83
|
%
|
|
$
|
205,345
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.79
|
%
|
The following table sets forth our certificates of deposit classified
by interest rate as of the dates indicated.
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Interest Rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1.00%
|
|
$
|
1,872
|
|
|
$
|
5,884
|
|
|
$
|
12,719
|
|
1.00% to 1.99%
|
|
|
47,349
|
|
|
|
119,035
|
|
|
|
97,831
|
|
2.00% to 2.99%
|
|
|
79,216
|
|
|
|
1,139
|
|
|
|
3,026
|
|
3.00% and greater
|
|
|
3,182
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
131,619
|
|
|
$
|
126,120
|
|
|
$
|
113,606
|
|
The following table sets forth the amount and maturities
of our certificates of deposit at December 31, 2018.
|
|
At December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
Period to Maturity
|
|
|
|
Less than or equal to One Year
|
|
|
More than One Year to Two Years
|
|
|
More than Two Years to Three Years
|
|
|
More than Three Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Percent of Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Interest Rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1.00%
|
|
$
|
1,872
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,872
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
1.00% to 1.99%
|
|
|
34,742
|
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
8,639
|
|
|
|
1,506
|
|
|
|
47,349
|
|
|
|
36.0
|
|
2.00% to 2.99%
|
|
|
35,705
|
|
|
|
39,931
|
|
|
|
2,710
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
79,216
|
|
|
|
60.2
|
|
3.00% and greater
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,838
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,182
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
72,319
|
|
|
$
|
45,231
|
|
|
$
|
11,693
|
|
|
$
|
2,376
|
|
|
$
|
131,619
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
As of December 31, 2018, the
aggregate amount of our outstanding certificates of deposit in amounts greater than or equal to $100,000 was $85.8 million. The
following table sets forth the maturity of these certificates as of December 31, 2018.
|
|
At December 31,
2018
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months or less
|
|
$
|
9,065
|
|
Over three months through six months
|
|
|
13,341
|
|
Over six months through one year
|
|
|
25,169
|
|
Over one year to three years
|
|
|
37,096
|
|
Over three years
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
85,837
|
|
Borrowing Capacity
. As a
member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston, Melrose Bank is eligible to obtain advances upon the security of the FHLB stock
owned and certain residential mortgage loans, provided certain standards related to credit-worthiness have been met. FHLB advances
are available pursuant to several credit programs, each of which has its own interest rate and range of maturities. The remaining
maximum borrowing capacity with the FHLB at December 31, 2018 was approximately $72.2 million subject to the purchase of additional
FHLB stock. We had borrowings of $34.0 million and $29.0 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Additionally,
at December 31, 2018, we had the ability to borrow up to $5.0 million on a Federal Funds line of credit with the Co-Operative
Central Bank.
Subsidiary and Other Activities
Melrose Bancorp, Inc. has one subsidiary,
Melrose Bank.
Melrose Bank has one subsidiary, MCBSC,
Inc., a Massachusetts corporation, which is engaged in the buying, selling and holding of investment securities. The income earned
on MCBSC, Inc.’s securities is subject to a significantly lower rate of state tax than that assessed on income earned on
securities maintained at Melrose Bank. At December 31, 2018, MCBSC, Inc. had total assets of $22.7 million, almost all of
which were in securities.
Expense and Tax Allocation
Melrose Bank has entered into an agreement
with Melrose Bancorp to provide it with certain administrative support services for compensation not less than the fair market
value of the services provided. In addition, Melrose Bank and Melrose Bancorp have entered into an agreement to establish a method
for allocating and for reimbursing the payment of their consolidated tax liability.
Personnel
As of December 31, 2018, we had 28
full-time equivalent employees. Our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining group. Management believes that
we have a good working relationship with our employees.
Availability of Annual Report on Form 10-K
This Annual Report on Form 10-K is available
by written request to: Melrose Bancorp, Inc. 638 Main Street, Melrose, Massachusetts 02176, Attention: Corporate Secretary.
REGULATION AND SUPERVISION
General
Melrose Bank is a Massachusetts stock co-operative
bank and is the wholly owned subsidiary of Melrose Bancorp, Inc., a Maryland corporation, which is a registered bank holding company.
Melrose Bank’s deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC, and by the Share Insurance Fund of the Co-Operative
Central Bank of Massachusetts for amounts in excess of the FDIC insurance limits. Melrose Bank is subject to extensive regulation
by the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks, as its chartering agency, and by the FDIC, its primary federal regulator and deposit
insurer. Melrose Bank is required to file reports with, and is periodically examined by, the FDIC and the Massachusetts Commissioner
of Banks concerning its activities and financial condition and must obtain regulatory approvals prior to entering into certain
transactions, including, but not limited to, mergers with or acquisitions of other financial institutions. Melrose Bank must comply
with consumer protection regulations issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Melrose Bank also is a member of and owns
stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston, which is one of the twelve regional banks in the FHLB System.
As a bank holding company, Melrose Bancorp
is subject to examination and supervision by, and is required to file certain reports with, the Federal Reserve Board. Melrose
Bancorp is also subject to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission under the federal securities laws.
The regulatory and supervisory structure
establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which an institution can engage and is intended primarily for the protection
of depositors and the deposit insurance funds, rather than for the protection of stockholders and creditors. The regulatory structure
also gives the regulatory authorities extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and
examination policies, including policies concerning the establishment of deposit insurance assessment fees, classification of assets
and establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes. Any change in such regulatory requirements and policies,
whether by the Massachusetts legislature, the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks, the FDIC, or the Federal Reserve Board or Congress,
could have a material adverse impact on the financial condition and results of operations of Melrose Bancorp, Inc. and Melrose
Bank. As is further described below, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”)
has significantly changed the bank regulatory structure and may affect the lending, investment and general operating activities
of depository institutions and their holding companies.
Set forth below are certain material regulatory
requirements that are applicable to Melrose Bank and Melrose Bancorp. This description of statutes and regulations is not intended
to be a complete description of such statutes and regulations and their effects on Melrose Bank and Melrose Bancorp. Any change
in these laws or regulations, whether by Congress or the applicable regulatory agencies, could have a material adverse impact
on Melrose Bancorp, Melrose Bank and their operations.
Massachusetts Banking Laws and Supervision
General.
As a Massachusetts-chartered
co-operative bank, Melrose Bank is subject to supervision, regulation and examination by the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks
and to various Massachusetts statutes and regulations which govern, among other things, investment powers, lending and deposit-taking
activities, borrowings, maintenance of surplus and reserve accounts, distribution of earnings and payment of dividends. In addition,
Melrose Bank is subject to Massachusetts consumer protection and civil rights laws and regulations. The approval of the Massachusetts
Commissioner of Banks or the Massachusetts Board of Bank Incorporation is required for a Massachusetts-chartered bank to establish
or close branches, merge with other financial institutions, issue stock and undertake certain other activities. Any Massachusetts
bank that does not operate in accordance with the regulations, policies and directives of the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks
may be sanctioned. The Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks may suspend or remove directors or officers of a bank who have violated
the law, conducted a bank’s business in a manner that is unsafe, unsound or contrary to the depositors’ interests,
or been negligent in the performance of their duties. In addition, the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks has the authority to
appoint a receiver or conservator if it is determined that the bank is conducting its business in an unsafe or unauthorized manner,
and under certain other circumstances.
The powers that Massachusetts-chartered
co-operative banks can exercise under these laws include, but are not limited to, the following:
Lending Activities.
A Massachusetts-chartered
co-operative bank may make a wide variety of mortgage loans including fixed-rate loans, adjustable-rate loans, variable-rate loans,
participation loans, graduated payment loans, construction and development loans, condominium and co-operative loans, second mortgage
loans and other types of loans that may be made in accordance with applicable regulations. Commercial loans may be made to corporations
and other commercial enterprises with or without security. Consumer and personal loans may also be made with or without security.
Insurance Sales.
Massachusetts
banks may engage in insurance sales activities if the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks has approved a plan of operation for
insurance activities and the bank obtains a license from the Massachusetts Division of Insurance. A bank may be licensed directly
or indirectly through an affiliate or a subsidiary corporation established for this purpose. Melrose Bank does not sell or refer
insurance products, and has not sought approval for insurance sales activities.
Dividends.
A Massachusetts
co-operative bank may declare cash dividends from net profits not more frequently than quarterly. Non-cash dividends may be declared
at any time. No dividends may be declared, credited or paid if the bank’s capital stock is impaired. A Massachusetts co-operative
bank with outstanding preferred stock may not, without the prior approval of the Commissioner of Banks, declare dividends to the
common stock without also declaring dividends to the preferred stock. The approval of the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks is
required if the total of all dividends declared in any calendar year exceeds the total of its net profits for that year combined
with its retained net profits of the preceding two years, less any required transfer to surplus or a fund for the retirement of
any preferred stock. Net profits for this purpose means the remainder of all earnings from current operations plus actual recoveries
on loans and investments and other assets after deducting current operating expenses, actual losses, accrued dividends on preferred
stock, if any, and all federal and state taxes. Dividends from Melrose Bancorp may depend, in part, upon receipt of dividends from
Melrose Bank. The payment of dividends from Melrose Bank would be restricted by federal law if the payment of such dividends resulted
in Melrose Bank failing to meet regulatory capital requirements.
Parity Regulation.
A Massachusetts
bank may, in accordance with Massachusetts law and regulations issued by the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks, exercise any
power and engage in any activity that has been authorized for national banks, federal thrifts or state banks in a state other
than Massachusetts, provided that the activity is permissible under applicable federal and not specifically prohibited by Massachusetts
law. Such powers and activities must be subject to the same limitations and restrictions imposed on the national bank, federal
thrift or out-of-state bank that exercised the power or activity. A Massachusetts cooperative bank may exercise such powers, and
engage in such activities by providing 30 days’ advanced written notice to the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks
.
Loans to One Borrower
Limitations.
In accordance with FDIC regulation generally the total obligations to one borrower may not exceed 15% of
the total of the Bank’s capital, or $5.6 million.
Loans to a Bank’s Insiders.
Massachusetts law provides that a Massachusetts financial institution shall comply with Regulation O of the Federal Reserve
Board, which generally requires that extensions of credit to insiders:
● be
made on terms that are substantially the same as, and follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than,
those prevailing for comparable transactions with unaffiliated persons and that do not involve more than the normal risk of repayment
or present other unfavorable features; and
●
not exceed certain limitations on the amount of credit extended to such persons, individually and in the aggregate, which
limits are based, in part, on the amount of the Massachusetts financial institution’s capital
.
Investment Activities.
In
general, Massachusetts-chartered co-operative banks may invest in preferred and common stock of any corporation organized under
the laws of the United States or any state provided such investments do not involve control of any corporation and do not, in the
aggregate, exceed 4% of the Bank’s deposits. Federal law imposes additional restrictions on Melrose Bank’s investment
activities. See “– Federal Banking Regulation – Business Activities”.
Regulatory Enforcement Authority.
Any Massachusetts co-operative bank that does not operate in accordance with the regulations, policies and directives of the Massachusetts
Commissioner of Banks may be subject to sanctions for non-compliance, including revocation of its charter. The Massachusetts Commissioner
of Banks may, under certain circumstances, suspend or remove officers or directors who have violated the law, conducted the bank’s
business in an unsafe or unsound manner or contrary to the depositors interests or been negligent in the performance of their duties.
Upon finding that a bank has engaged in an unfair or deceptive act or practice, the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks may issue
an order to cease and desist and impose a fine on the bank concerned. The Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks also has authority
to take possession of a bank and appoint a liquidating agent under certain conditions such as an unsafe and unsound condition to
transact business, the conduct of business in an unsafe or unauthorized manner of impaired capital. In addition, Massachusetts
consumer protection and civil rights statutes applicable to Melrose Bank permit private individual and class action law suits and
provide for the rescission of consumer transactions, including loans, and the recovery of statutory and punitive damage and attorney’s
fees in the case of certain violations of those statutes.
Co-Operative Central Bank and Share
Insurance Fund.
All Massachusetts-chartered co-operative banks are required to be members of the Co-Operative Central Bank,
which maintains the Share Insurance Fund that insures co-operative bank deposits in excess of federal deposit insurance coverage.
The Co-Operative Central Bank is authorized to charge co-operative banks an annual assessment fee on deposit balances in excess
of amounts insured by the FDIC.
Protection of Personal Information.
Massachusetts has adopted regulatory requirements intended to protect personal information. The requirements are similar to existing
federal laws such as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act that require organizations to establish written information security programs to
prevent identity theft. The Massachusetts regulation also contains technology system requirements, especially for the encryption
of personal information sent over wireless or public networks or stored on portable devices.
Massachusetts has other statutes or regulations
that are similar to certain of the federal provisions discussed below.
Federal Banking Regulation
Business Activities.
Under
federal law, all state-chartered FDIC-insured banks, including co-operative banks, have been limited in their activities as principal
and in their equity investments to the type and the amount authorized for national banks, notwithstanding state law. Federal law
permits exceptions to these limitations. For example, certain state-chartered co-operative banks may, with FDIC approval, continue
to exercise state authority to invest in common or preferred stocks listed on a national securities exchange and in the shares
of an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The maximum permissible investment is the lesser
of 100.0% of Tier 1 capital or the maximum amount permitted by Massachusetts law. Such grandfathered authority may be terminated
under certain circumstances including a change in charter or a determination by the FDIC that such investments pose a safety and
soundness risk.
The FDIC is also authorized to permit
state banks to engage in state authorized activities or investments not permissible for national banks (other than non-subsidiary
equity investments) if they meet all applicable capital requirements and it is determined that such activities or investments
do not pose a significant risk to the FDIC insurance fund. The FDIC has adopted regulations governing the procedures for institutions
seeking approval to engage in such activities or investments. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 specified that a state bank may
control a subsidiary that engages in activities as principal that would only be permitted for a national bank to conduct in a
“financial subsidiary,” if a bank meets specified conditions and deducts its investment in the subsidiary for regulatory
capital purposes.
Capital Requirements.
Federal
regulations require FDIC-insured depository institutions to meet several minimum capital standards: a common equity Tier 1 capital
to risk-based assets ratio of 4.5%, a Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets ratio of 6.0%, a total capital to risk-based assets
of 8.0%, and a 4.0% Tier 1 capital to average assets leverage ratio.
For purposes of the regulatory
capital requirements, common equity Tier 1 capital is generally defined as common stockholders’ equity and
retained earnings. Tier 1 capital is generally defined as common equity Tier 1 and additional Tier 1 capital. Additional Tier
1 capital includes certain noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus and minority interests in equity
accounts of consolidated subsidiaries. Total capital includes Tier 1 capital (common equity Tier 1 capital plus additional
Tier 1 capital) and Tier 2 capital. Tier 2 capital is comprised of capital instruments and related surplus, meeting specified
requirements, and may include cumulative preferred stock and long-term perpetual preferred stock, mandatory convertible
securities, intermediate preferred stock and subordinated debt. Also included in Tier 2 capital is the allowance for loan and
lease losses limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets and, for institutions that made such an election regarding
the treatment of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”), up to 45% of net unrealized gains on
available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair market values. Institutions that have not exercised the
AOCI opt-out have AOCI incorporated into common equity Tier 1 capital (including unrealized gains and losses on
available-for-sale-securities). We have exercised the opt-out and therefore we do not include AOCI in our regulatory
capital determinations. Calculation of all types of regulatory capital is subject to deductions and adjustments specified in
the regulations.
In
determining the amount of risk-weighted assets for purposes of calculating risk-based capital ratios, all assets, including certain
off-balance sheet assets (
e.g.
, recourse obligations, direct credit substitutes, residual interests) are multiplied by
a risk weight factor assigned by the regulations based on the risks believed inherent in the type of asset. Higher levels of capital
are required for asset categories believed to present greater risk. For example, a risk weight of 0% is assigned to cash and U.S.
government securities, a risk weight of 50% is generally assigned to prudently underwritten first lien one to four- family residential
mortgages, a risk weight of 100% is assigned to commercial and consumer loans, a risk weight of 150% is assigned to certain past
due loans and a risk weight of between 0% to 600% is assigned to permissible equity interests, depending on certain specified
factors.
In
addition to establishing the minimum regulatory capital requirements, the regulations limit capital distributions and certain
discretionary bonus payments to management if the institution does not hold a “capital conservation buffer” consisting
of 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted asset above the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital
requirements. The capital conservation buffer requirement began being phased in starting on January 1, 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted
assets and increased each year until fully implemented at 2.5% on January 1, 2019. At December 31, 2018, Melrose Bank exceeded
the fully phased in regulatory requirement for the capital conservation buffer.
Legislation
enacted in May 2018 requires the federal banking agencies, including the FDIC, to establish for qualifying institutions with less
than $10 billion of assets a “community bank leverage ratio” of between 8% to 10% tangible equity/consolidated assets.
Institutions with capital levels meeting or exceeding the specified requirement will be considered to comply with the applicable
regulatory capital requirements, including all risk-based requirements. The establishment of the community bank leverage ratio
is subject to notice and comment rulemaking by the federal regulators. A proposed rule issued by the federal regulators in December
2018 would specify a 9% community bank leverage ratio minimum for institutions to opt into the alternative framework.
The Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation Improvement Act requires each federal banking agency to revise its risk-based capital standards for insured institutions
to ensure that those standards take adequate account of interest-rate risk, concentration of credit risk, and the risk of nontraditional
activities, as well as to reflect the actual performance and expected risk of loss on multi-family residential loans. The FDIC,
along with the other federal banking agencies, adopted a regulation providing that the agencies will take into account the exposure
of a bank’s capital and economic value to changes in interest rate risk in assessing a bank’s capital adequacy. The
FDIC also has authority to establish individual minimum capital requirements in appropriate cases upon determination that an institution’s
capital level is, or is likely to become, inadequate in light of the particular circumstances.
Community Reinvestment Act and Fair
Lending Laws.
All institutions have a responsibility under the Community Reinvestment Act (the “CRA”) and related
regulations to help meet the credit needs of their communities, including low- and moderate-income borrowers. In connection with
its examination of a state non-member bank, the FDIC is required to assess the institution’s record of compliance with the
CRA. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions nor does it limit an institution’s
discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community, consistent
with the CRA. The CRA does require the FDIC, in connection with its examination of a non-member bank, to assess the institution’s
record of meeting the credit needs of its community and to take such record into account in its evaluation of certain applications
by such institution, including applications to acquire branches and other financial institutions. The CRA requires the FDIC to
provide a written evaluation of an institution’s CRA performance utilizing a four-tiered descriptive rating system. An institution’s
failure to comply with the provisions of the CRA could, at a minimum, result in denial of certain corporate applications such as
branches or mergers, or in restrictions on its activities. The CRA requires all institutions insured by the FDIC to publicly disclose
their rating. Melrose Bank received a “Satisfactory” CRA rating in its most recent federal examinat
i
on.
Massachusetts has its own statutory counterpart
to the CRA that is applicable to Melrose Bank. The Massachusetts version is generally similar to the CRA but utilizes a five-tiered
descriptive rating system. Massachusetts law requires the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks to consider, but not be limited to,
a bank’s record of performance under Massachusetts law in considering any application by the bank to establish a branch or
other deposit-taking facility, to relocate an office or to merge or consolidate with or acquire the assets and assume the liabilities
of any other banking institution. Melrose Bank’s most recent rating under Massachusetts law was “Satisfactory.”
In addition, the Equal Credit Opportunity
Act and the Fair Housing Act prohibit lenders from discriminating in their lending practices on the basis of characteristics specified
in those statutes. The failure to comply with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act could result in enforcement
actions by the FDIC, as well as other federal regulatory agencies and the Department of Justice.
Transactions with Related Parties.
An institution’s authority to engage in transactions with its affiliates is limited by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal
Reserve Act and federal regulation. An affiliate is generally a company that controls, or is under common control with an insured
depository institution such as Melrose Bank. Melrose Bancorp will be an affiliate of Melrose Bank because of its control of Melrose
Bank. In general, transactions between an insured depository institution and its affiliates are subject to certain quantitative
limits and collateral requirements. Transactions with affiliates also must be consistent with safe and sound banking practices,
generally not involve the purchase of low-quality assets and be on terms that are as favorable to the institution as comparable
transactions with non-affiliates.
Melrose Bank’s authority to extend
credit to its directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders, as well as to entities controlled by such persons, is currently
governed by the requirements of Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O of the Federal Reserve Board.
Among other things, these provisions generally require that extensions of credit to insiders:
|
●
|
be made on terms that are
substantially the same as, and follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than, those prevailing for comparable
transactions with unaffiliated persons and that do not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable
features; and
|
|
●
|
not exceed certain limitations on the amount of credit extended to such persons, individually and in the aggregate, which limits are based, in part, on the amount of Melrose Bank’s capital.
|
In addition, extensions of credit in excess
of certain limits must be approved by Melrose Bank’s loan committee or board of directors. Extensions of credit to executive
officers are subject to additional limits based on the type of extension involved.
Enforcement.
The FDIC has extensive
enforcement responsibility over state non-member banks and has authority to bring enforcement action against all “institution-affiliated
parties,” including directors, officers, stockholders, attorneys, appraisers and accountants who knowingly or recklessly
participate in wrongful action likely to have an adverse effect on an institution. Formal enforcement action by the FDIC may range
from the issuance of a capital directive or cease and desist order to removal of officers and/or directors of the institution and
the appointment of a receiver or conservator. Civil penalties cover a wide range of violations and actions, and range up to $25,000
per day, unless a finding of reckless disregard is made, in which case penalties may be as high as $1 million per day. The FDIC
is required, with certain exceptions, to appoint a receiver or conservator for an insured state non-member bank if that bank was
“critically undercapitalized” on average during the calendar quarter beginning 270 days after the date on which the
institution became “critically undercapitalized.” The FDIC may also appoint itself as conservator or receiver for an
insured state non-member bank under specified circumstances, including: (1) insolvency; (2) substantial dissipation of
assets or earnings through violations of law or unsafe or unsound practices; (3) existence of an unsafe or unsound condition
to transact business; (4) insufficient capital; or (5) the incurrence of losses that will deplete substantially all of
the institution’s capital with no reasonable prospect of replenishment without federal assistance. The FDIC also has the
authority to terminate deposit insurance.
Standards for Safety and Soundness.
As required by statute, the federal banking agencies adopted final regulations and Interagency Guidelines Establishing
Standards for Safety and Soundness to implement safety and soundness standards. The guidelines set forth the safety and soundness
standards that the federal banking agencies use to identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before capital
becomes impaired. The guidelines address internal controls and information systems, internal audit system, credit underwriting,
loan documentation, interest rate exposure, asset growth, asset quality, earnings and compensation, fees and benefits. The agencies
have also established standards for safeguarding customer information. If the appropriate federal banking agency determines that
an institution fails to meet any standard prescribed by the guidelines, the agency may require the institution to submit to the
agency an acceptable plan to achieve compliance with the standard.
Investment Activities.
All
state-chartered, FDIC- insured banks are generally limited in their investment activities to principal and equity investments of
the type and in the amount authorized for national banks, notwithstanding state law, subject to certain exceptions. For example,
state-chartered banks may, with FDIC approval, continue to exercise state authority to invest in common or preferred stocks listed
on a national securities exchange or the NASDAQ Global Market and in the shares of an investment company registered under the Investment
Company Act of 1940, as amended. The maximum permissible investment is 100% of Tier 1 Capital, as specified by the FDIC’s
regulations, or the maximum amount permitted by Massachusetts law, whichever is less.
In addition, the FDIC is authorized to permit
such a state bank to engage in state-authorized activities or investments not permissible for national banks (other than non-subsidiary
equity investments) if it meets all applicable capital requirements and it is determined that such activities or investments do
not pose a significant risk to the Deposit Insurance Fund. The FDIC has adopted procedures for institutions seeking approval to
engage in such activities or investments. In addition, a nonmember bank may control a subsidiary that engages in activities as
principal that would only be permitted for a national bank to conduct in a “financial subsidiary” if a bank meets specified
conditions and deducts its investment in the subsidiary for regulatory capital purposes
.
Interstate Banking and Branching.
Federal law permits well-capitalized and well-managed bank holding companies to acquire banks in any state, subject to Federal
Reserve Board approval, certain concentration limits and other specified conditions. Interstate mergers of banks are also authorized,
subject to regulatory approval and other specified conditions. In addition, among other things, recent amendments made by the Dodd-Frank
Act permit banks to establish
de novo
branches on an interstate basis provided that branching is authorized by the law of
the host state for the banks chartered by that state.
Prompt Corrective Action Regulations
.
The FDIC is required by law to take supervisory actions against undercapitalized institutions under its jurisdiction, the severity
of which depends upon the institution’s level of capital.
Under FDIC prompt corrective action regulations
Melrose Bank must have a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 5.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 8.0%, a CET1 risk-based
capital ratio of at least 6.5%, and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.0% in order to be classified as “well-capitalized.”
An institution that has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 8.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio less than 6.0%, a
CET1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4.5%, or a Tier 1 leverage ratio of less than 4.0%, is considered to be undercapitalized.
An institution that has total risk-based capital less than 6.0%, a CET1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 3.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based
capital ratio of less than 4.0%, or a Tier 1 leverage ratio that is less than 3.0% is considered to be “significantly undercapitalized.”
An institution that has a tangible capital to assets ratio equal to or less than 2% is deemed to be “critically undercapitalized.”
Generally, a receiver or conservator must
be appointed for an institution that is “critically undercapitalized” within specific time frames. The regulations
also provide that a capital restoration plan must be filed with the FDIC within 45 days of the date that an institution is deemed
to have received notice that it is “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” or “critically
undercapitalized.” Any holding company of an institution that is required to submit a capital restoration plan must guarantee
performance under the plan in an amount of up to the lesser of 5% of the institution’s assets at the time it was deemed to
be undercapitalized by the FDIC or the amount necessary to restore the institution to adequately capitalized status. This guarantee
remains in place until the FDIC notifies the institution that it has maintained adequately capitalized status for each of four
consecutive calendar quarters. Institutions that are undercapitalized become subject to certain mandatory measures such as restrictions
on capital distributions and asset growth. The FDIC may also take any one of a number of discretionary supervisory actions against
undercapitalized institutions, including the issuance of a capital directive and the replacement of senior executive officers and
directors.
At December 31, 2018, Melrose Bank met
the criteria for being considered “well capitalized.”
The previously
referenced proposed rulemaking to establish a “community bank leverage ratio” would adjust the referenced categories
for qualifying institutions that opt into the alternative framework for regulatory capital requirements. Institutions that comply
with the ration would be deemed “well capitalized.”
Insurance of Deposit Accounts.
The Deposit Insurance Fund of the FDIC insures deposits at FDIC-insured financial institutions such as Melrose Bank. Deposit accounts
in Melrose Bank are insured by the FDIC generally up to a maximum of $250,000 per separately insured depositor and up to a maximum
of $250,000 for self-directed retirement accounts. The FDIC charges insured depository institutions premiums to maintain the Deposit
Insurance Fund.
Under the FDIC’s risk-based
assessment system, insured institutions are assigned to one of four risk categories based on supervisory evaluations,
regulatory capital levels and certain other risk factors. Rates are based on each institution’s risk category and
certain specified risk adjustments. Stronger institutions pay lower rates while riskier institutions pay higher rates.
Assessments are based on an institution’s average consolidated total assets minus average tangible equity instead of
total deposits. Assessment rates (inclusive of possible adjustments) for banks with less than $10.0 billion of assets
currently range from 1 1/2 to 30 basis points of each institution’s total assets less tangible capital. The FDIC
may increase or decrease the scale uniformly, except that no adjustment can deviate more than two basis points from the base
scale without notice and comment rulemaking. The FDIC’s current system represents a change, required by the
Dodd-Frank Act, from its prior practice of basing the assessment on an institution’s volume of deposits.
In addition to the FDIC assessments, the
Financing Corporation (“FICO”) is authorized to impose and collect, with the approval of the FDIC, assessments for
anticipated payments, issuance costs and custodial fees on bonds issued by the FICO in the 1980s to recapitalize the former Federal
Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation. The bonds issued by the FICO are due to mature in 2017 through 2019. For the quarter ended
December 31, 2018, the annualized FICO assessment was equal to 32 basis points of total assets less tangible capital.
The Dodd-Frank Act increased the
minimum target Deposit Insurance Fund ratio from 1.15% of estimated insured deposits to 1.35% of estimated insured deposits.
The FDIC was required to seek to achieve the 1.35% ratio by September 30, 2020. Insured institutions with assets of $10
billion or more were supposed to fund the increase. The FDIC indicated in November 2018 that the 1.35% ratio was exceeded.
Insured institutions of less than $10 billion of assets will receive credits for the portion of their assessments that
contributed to raising the reserve ratio between 1.15% and 1.35% effective when the fund ratio achieves 1.38%. The Dodd-Frank
Act eliminated the 1.5% maximum fund ratio, instead leaving it to the discretion of the FDIC
and the FDIC has exercised that discretion by establishing a long range fund of 2.0%.
The FDIC has authority to increase insurance
assessments. Any significant increases would have an adverse effect on the operating expenses and results of operations of Melrose
Bank. Management cannot predict what assessment rates will be in the future.
Insurance of deposits may be terminated
by the FDIC upon a finding that an institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition
to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC. We do not
currently know of any practice, condition or violation that may lead to termination of our deposit insurance.
Privacy Regulations.
FDIC
regulations generally require that Melrose Bank disclose its privacy policy, including identifying with whom it shares a customer’s
“non-public personal information,” to customers at the time of establishing the customer relationship and annually
thereafter. In addition, Melrose Bank is required to provide its customers with the ability to “opt-out” of having
their personal information shared with unaffiliated third parties and not to disclose account numbers or access codes to non-affiliated
third parties for marketing purposes. Melrose Bank currently has a privacy protection policy in place and believes that such policy
is in compliance with the regulations.
Consumer Protection and Fair Lending
Regulations.
Massachusetts co-operative banks are subject to a variety of federal and Massachusetts statutes and regulations
that are intended to protect consumers and prohibit discrimination in the granting of credit. These statutes and regulations provide
for a range of sanctions for non-compliance with their terms, including imposition of administrative fines and remedial orders,
and referral to the Attorney General for prosecution of a civil action for actual and punitive damages and injunctive relief.
Certain of these statutes authorize private individual and class action lawsuits and the award of actual, statutory and punitive
damages and attorneys’ fees for certain types of violations.
Prohibitions Against Tying Arrangements
.
State non-member banks are prohibited, subject to some exceptions, from extending credit to or offering any other service, or fixing
or varying the consideration for such extension of credit or service, on the condition that the customer obtain some additional
service from the institution or its affiliates or not obtain services of a competitor of the institution.
Federal Reserve System.
Federal Reserve Board regulations require depository institutions to maintain noninterest-earning reserves against their
transaction accounts (primarily NOW and regular checking accounts). The Federal Reserve Board regulations generally require
that reserves be maintained against aggregate transaction accounts as follows: for that portion of transaction accounts
aggregating $124.2 million or less (which may be adjusted by the Federal Reserve Board) the reserve requirement is 3.0% and
the amounts greater than $124.2 million require a 10.0% reserve (which may be adjusted annually by the Federal Reserve Board
between 8.0% and 14.0%). The first $16.3 million of otherwise reservable balances (which may be adjusted by the Federal
Reserve Board) are exempted from the reserve requirements. Melrose Bank is in compliance with these requirements.
Federal Home Loan Bank System.
Melrose Bank is a member of the FHLB System, which consists of 12 regional Federal Home Loan Banks. The FHLB System provides a
central credit facility primarily for member institutions as well as other entities involved in home mortgage lending. As a member
of the FHLB of Boston, Melrose Bank is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the FHLB. As of December 31,
2018, Melrose Bank was in compliance with this requirement. Based on redemption provisions of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston,
the stock has no quoted market value and is carried at cost. Melrose Bank reviews for impairment based on the ultimate recoverability
of the cost basis of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock. As of December 31, 2018, no impairment has been recognized.
At its discretion, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston may declare dividends on the stock. The Federal
Home Loan Banks are required to provide funds for certain purposes including the resolution of insolvent thrifts in the late 1980s
and to contributing funds for affordable housing programs. These requirements could reduce the amount of dividends that the Federal
Home Loan Banks pay to their members and result in the Federal Home Loan Banks imposing a higher rate of interest on advances to
their members. In 2018, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston paid dividends equal to an annual yield of 5.66%. There can be no
assurance that such dividends will continue in the future.
Other Regulations
Interest and other charges collected or
contracted for by Melrose Bank are subject to state usury laws and federal laws concerning interest rates. Melrose Bank’s
operations are also subject to federal laws applicable to credit transactions, such as the:
|
●
|
Truth-In-Lending Act,
governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers;
|
|
●
|
Real Estate Settlement
Procedures Act, requiring that borrowers for mortgage loans for one- to four-family residential real estate receive various disclosures,
including good faith estimates of settlement costs, lender servicing and escrow account practices, and prohibiting certain practices
that increase the cost of settlement services;
|
|
●
|
Home Mortgage Disclosure
Act, requiring financial institutions to provide information to enable the public and public officials to determine whether a
financial institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs of the community it serves;
|
|
●
|
Equal Credit Opportunity
Act, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, creed or other prohibited factors in extending credit;
|
|
●
|
Fair Credit Reporting
Act, governing the use and provision of information to credit reporting agencies;
|
|
●
|
Fair Debt Collection
Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be collected by collection agencies;
|
|
●
|
the Biggert-Watters
Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012; and
|
|
●
|
rules and regulations
of the various federal agencies charged with the responsibility of implementing such federal laws.
|
In addition, the Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau issues regulations and standards under these federal consumer protection laws that affect our consumer businesses. These
include regulations setting “ability to repay” and “qualified mortgage” standards for residential mortgage
loans and mortgage loan servicing and originator compensation standards. Melrose Bank is evaluating recent regulations and proposals,
and devotes significant compliance, legal and operational resources to compliance with consumer protection regulations and standards.
The operations of Melrose Bank also are
subject to the:
|
●
|
Right to Financial Privacy
Act, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of consumer financial records and prescribes procedures for complying with
administrative subpoenas of financial records;
|
|
●
|
Electronic Funds Transfer
Act and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, which govern automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts and customers’
rights and liabilities arising from the use of automated teller machines and other electronic banking services;
|
|
●
|
Check Clearing for the
21
st
Century Act (also known as “Check 21”), which gives “substitute checks,” such as digital
check images and copies made from that image, the same legal standing as the original paper check;
|
|
●
|
The USA PATRIOT Act,
which requires depository institution to, among other things, establish broadened anti-money laundering compliance programs, and
due diligence policies and controls to ensure the detection and reporting of money laundering. Such required compliance programs
are intended to supplement existing compliance requirements that also apply to financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act
and the Office of Foreign Assets Control regulations; and
|
|
●
|
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley
Act, which places limitations on the sharing of consumer financial information by financial institutions with unaffiliated third
parties. Specifically, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requires all financial institutions offering financial products or services
to retail customers to provide such customers with the financial institution’s privacy policy and provide such customers
the opportunity to “opt out” of the sharing of certain personal financial information with unaffiliated third parties.
|
Holding Company Regulation
General
.
Melrose Bancorp
is a bank holding company within the meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. As such, Melrose Bancorp is registered with
the Federal Reserve Board and is subject to regulations, examinations, supervision and reporting requirements applicable to bank
holding companies. In addition, the Federal Reserve Board has enforcement authority over Melrose Bancorp and its non-bank subsidiaries.
Among other things, this authority permits the Federal Reserve Board to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to
be a serious risk to the subsidiary institution.
Permissible Activities.
Melrose
Bancorp is subject to examination, regulation, and periodic reporting under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as administered
by the Federal Reserve Board. Melrose Bancorp is required to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board to acquire
all, or substantially all, of the assets of any bank or bank holding company. Prior Federal Reserve Board approval also is required
for Melrose Bancorp to acquire direct or indirect ownership or control of any voting securities of any bank or bank holding company
if, after such acquisition, it would directly or indirectly own or control more than 5% of any class of voting shares of the bank
or bank holding company. In evaluating applications by holding companies to acquire depository institutions, the Federal Reserve
Board must consider, among other things, the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the company and institutions
involved, the effect of the acquisition on the risk to the federal deposit insurance fund, the convenience and needs of the community
and competitive factors. In addition to the approval of the Federal Reserve Board, prior approval may also be necessary from other
agencies having supervisory jurisdiction over the bank to be acquired before any bank acquisition can be completed.
A bank holding company is generally prohibited
from engaging in non-banking activities, or acquiring direct or indirect control of more than 5% of the voting securities of any
company engaged in non-banking activities. One of the principal exceptions to this prohibition is for activities found by the Federal
Reserve Board to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. Some of
the principal activities that the Federal Reserve Board has determined by regulation to be so closely related to banking are: (i) making
or servicing loans; (ii) performing certain data processing services; (iii) providing discount brokerage services; (iv) acting
as fiduciary, investment or financial advisor; (v) leasing personal or real property; (vi) making investments in corporations
or projects designed primarily to promote community welfare; and (vii) acquiring a savings and loan association whose direct
and indirect activities are limited to those permitted for bank holding companies. A bank holding company that meets certain criteria,
such as being well-capitalized and well-managed within the meaning of applicable regulations, may elect to become a “financial
holding company.” Such an election allows a bank holding company to engage in a broader array of financial activities, including
insurance and investment banking.
Source of Strength.
The Dodd-Frank
Act codified the “source of strength” doctrine. The Federal Reserve Board has issued regulations requiring that all
bank holding companies serve as a source of managerial and financial strength to their subsidiary banks by providing capital, liquidity
and other support in times of financial stress.
Dividends and Repurchases.
The Federal
Reserve Board has issued a policy statement regarding the payment of dividends and the repurchase of shares of common stock
by bank holding companies. In general, the policy provides that dividends should be paid only out of current earnings and
only if the prospective rate of earnings retention by the holding company appears consistent with the organization’s
capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. Regulatory guidance provides for prior regulatory consultation
with respect to capital distributions in certain circumstances such as where the company’s net income for the past four
quarters, net of dividends previously paid over that period, is insufficient to fully fund the dividend or the
company’s overall rate or earnings retention is inconsistent with the company’s capital needs and overall
financial condition. The ability of a bank holding company to pay dividends may be restricted if a subsidiary institution
becomes undercapitalized. The policy statement also states that a bank holding company should inform the Federal Reserve
Board supervisory staff prior to redeeming or repurchasing common stock or perpetual preferred stock if the bank holding
company is experiencing financial weaknesses or if the repurchase or redemption would result in a net reduction, as of the
end of a quarter, in the amount of such equity instruments outstanding compared with the beginning of the quarter in which
the redemption or repurchase occurred. These regulatory policies may affect the ability of Melrose Bancorp, Inc. to pay
dividends, repurchase shares of common stock or otherwise engage in capital distributions.
A bank holding company is generally required to give the Federal Reserve Board prior written notice of
any purchase or redemption of then outstanding equity securities if the gross consideration for the purchase or redemption, when
combined with the net consideration paid for all such purchases or redemptions during the preceding 12 months, is equal to 10%
or more of the company’s consolidated net worth. The Federal Reserve Board may disapprove such a purchase or redemption if
it determines that the proposal would constitute an unsafe and unsound practice, or would violate any law, regulation, Federal
Reserve Board order or directive, or any condition imposed by, or written agreement with, the Federal Reserve Board. There is an
exception to this approval requirement for well-capitalized bank holding companies that meet certain other conditions.
Acquisition.
Under the Federal
Change in Bank Control Act, a notice must be submitted to the Federal Reserve Board if any person (including a company), or group
acting in concert, seeks to acquire direct or indirect “control” of a bank holding company. Under certain circumstances,
a change of control may occur, and prior notice is required, upon the acquisition of 10% or more of the company’s outstanding
voting stock, unless the Federal Reserve Board has found that the acquisition will not result in control of the company. A change
in control definitively occurs upon the acquisition of 25% or more of the company’s outstanding voting stock. Under the Change
in Bank Control Act, the Federal Reserve Board generally has 60 days from the filing of a complete notice to act, taking into consideration
certain factors, including the financial and managerial resources of the acquirer and the competitive effects of the acquisition.
Massachusetts Holding Company Regulation.
Under the Massachusetts banking laws, a company owning or controlling two or more banking institutions, including a co-operative
bank, is regulated as a bank holding company. The term “company” is defined by the Massachusetts banking laws similarly
to the definition of “company” under the Bank Holding Company Act. Each Massachusetts bank holding company: (i) must obtain
the approval of the Massachusetts Board of Bank Incorporation before engaging in certain transactions, such as the acquisition
of more than 5% of the voting stock of another banking institution; (ii) must register and file reports with the Massachusetts
Commissioner of Banks; and (iii) is subject to examination by the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks.
Federal Securities Laws
Melrose Bancorp common stock is registered
with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Melrose Bancorp is subject to the information,
proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Emerging Growth Company Status
The Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act
(the “JOBS Act”), which was enacted in April 2012, has made numerous changes to the federal securities laws to facilitate
access to capital markets. Under the JOBS Act, a company with total annual gross revenues of less than $1.07 billion during its
most recently completed fiscal year qualifies as an “emerging growth company.” Melrose Bancorp qualifies as an emerging
growth company under the JOBS Act, until the last day of the fiscal year of the issuer following the fifth anniversary of the date
of the sale of common equity securities of the company, or December 31, 2019.
An “emerging growth company”
may choose not to hold stockholder votes to approve annual executive compensation (more frequently referred to as “say-on-pay”
votes) or executive compensation payable in connection with a merger (more frequently referred to as “say-on-golden parachute”
votes). An emerging growth company also is not subject to the requirement that its auditors attest to the effectiveness of the
company’s internal control over financial reporting, and can provide scaled disclosure regarding executive compensation;
however, Melrose Bancorp will also not be subject to the auditor attestation requirement or additional executive compensation disclosure
so long as it remains a “smaller reporting company” under Securities and Exchange Commission regulations (generally
less than $250 million of voting and non-voting equity held by non-affiliates). Finally, an emerging growth company may elect to
comply with new or amended accounting pronouncements in the same manner as a private company, but must make such election when
the company is first required to file a registration statement. Such an election is irrevocable during the period a company is
an emerging growth company. Melrose Bancorp, Inc. has elected to comply with new or amended accounting pronouncements in the same
manner as a private company.
A company loses emerging growth company
status on the earlier of: (i) the last day of the fiscal year of the company during which it had total annual gross revenues
of $1.0 billion or more; (ii) the last day of the fiscal year of the issuer following the fifth anniversary of the date of
the first sale of common equity securities of the company pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities
Act of 1933; (iii) the date on which such company has, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $1.0 billion
in non-convertible debt; or (iv) the date on which such company is deemed to be a “large accelerated filer” under
Securities and Exchange Commission regulations (generally, at least $700 million of voting and non-voting equity held by non-affiliates).
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is intended to improve corporate responsibility, to provide for enhanced
penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies and to protect investors by improving the accuracy
and reliability of corporate disclosures pursuant to the securities laws. We have policies, procedures and systems designed to
comply with these regulations, and we review and document such policies, procedures and systems to ensure continued compliance
with these regulations.