Dundee Precious Metals Announces Updated Krumovgrad Project
Economics and Mine Plan Optimization
TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwired - Mar 28, 2014) -
(All amounts have been expressed in US Dollars except where
otherwise indicated)
Dundee Precious Metals Inc. (TSX:DPM)(TSX:DPM.WT.A) ("DPM" or
"the Company") announces the results of the capital cost update and
mine plan optimization which continue to support the construction
and operation of its Krumovgrad gold project (the "Project") in
Bulgaria.
Highlights:
- Upfront capital cost to build the Project estimated at $164
million
- Generates an IRR of 26%
- Low cash cost maintained at $389 per ounce of gold
equivalent
- Increased gold and silver production at lower throughput
rate
- Estimated average EBITDA increased to $65 million per year over
life of mine at $1,250 per ounce of gold
"As expected, the updated economics on Krumovgrad continue to
confirm the commercial and economic viability of the project,"
stated Rick Howes, President and CEO. "Further optimization of the
mine plan has provided for increased metals production at reduced
throughput. We continue to work hard to build strong relationships
within the community and gain their support in advancing to the
next stage of development. We continue to evaluate alternatives to
supplement internal cash flow with the optimal funding to support
the project, prior to moving forward with construction. This
project, once completed, will bring new economic opportunities to
the local community, the region and Bulgaria while creating value
for our shareholders," he added.
Following completion of the updated capital estimate and
optimized mine plan, the new up-front capital cost, excluding sunk
costs, is estimated at $164 million, up from the preliminary
estimate of $127 million, contained in the "Krumovgrad Gold Project
Definitive Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report" that was
filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com on January 13, 2012 (the "2012
Report"). This increase is due primarily to: an increase in the
contingency allowance of $11.0 million; better design certainty
which in turn generated increased capital cost estimates especially
in the earthworks and civil engineering areas; and vendor,
contractor and labour cost escalation since the 2010 based cost
estimates in the 2012 Report were established. Estimated sustaining
capital over the life of the mine is unchanged at $12.5
million.
Average annual concentrate production over the life of mine
("LOM") is anticipated to be 4,100 tonnes, containing, on average,
85,700 ounces of gold, and an average of 103,000 ounces of gold in
the first three years, and 38,700 ounces of silver. This compares
with average annual LOM concentrate production in the 2012 Report
of 11,500 tonnes containing, on average, 74,000 ounces of gold and
35,000 ounces of silver. Assumed gold and silver prices used for
financial modelling, of $1,250 per ounce and $23.00 per ounce,
respectively, produced a cash cost per ounce of gold equivalent
("AuEq") (defined below), estimated at $389 and an average annual
EBITDA (defined below) estimated at $65 million. The cash cost per
ounce of AuEq and EBITDA in the 2012 Report were estimated at $404
and $53 million, respectively. The updated return on the Project is
estimated to be 26%, down from the original estimate of 31%,
primarily reflecting a longer construction period and a higher
estimated project capital costs, partially offset by the benefits
resulting from an optimized mine plan.
Key Project Operating and Financial Metrics |
2014 |
2012 |
Average annual plant throughput |
775,512 tonnes |
850,000 tonnes |
Average annual concentrate production |
4,100 tonnes |
11,500 tonnes |
Average annual gold production |
85,700 oz |
74,000 oz |
Average annual silver production |
38,700 oz |
35,000 oz |
Total cash cost/tonne ore processed |
$44.13 |
$38.11 |
Total cash cost per oz AuEq (1) |
$389 |
$404 |
Upfront capital cost (2) |
$164.1 million |
$127.4 million |
Sustaining capital |
$12.5 million |
$12.5 million |
Closure and rehabilitation costs |
$14.7 million |
$13.5 million |
Average annual EBITDA |
$64.9 million |
$52.6 million |
|
Life of Mine |
Life of Mine |
Total gold production |
685,549 oz |
663,641 oz |
Total silver production |
309,915 oz |
314,939 oz |
NPV at a discount rate of 7.5%, after tax (2) |
$143.9 million |
$165.3 million |
Internal Rate of Return, after tax (IRR) (2) |
26.3% |
31.0% |
Payback Period, after tax (from start of production) |
2.5 years |
3.3 years |
Mine Life |
8 years |
9 years |
Gold Price Assumption |
$1,250/oz |
$1,250/oz |
Silver Price Assumption |
$23.00/oz |
$25.00/0z |
|
|
(1) |
AuEq ounces include silver ounces produced and sold converted
to a AuEq based on the ratio of the average metal prices for the
commodities. |
(2) |
Excludes sunk capital. |
Summary of Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimates
The estimate of Mineral Resources completed by RSG Global in
2005 has been reviewed by CSA Global (UK) Ltd. ("CSA") in 2012 and
2014 and modified, though not materially or significantly. The
estimation parameters and assumptions used by RSG remain valid and
modification by CSA relates only to how the block model has been
reported and presented for mine planning purposes. The underlying
grade estimations have not been modified.
The following table summarizes the Mineral Reserve and Mineral
Resource estimates for the Project as at December 31, 2013.
MINERAL RESERVES |
|
GOLD |
SILVER |
|
Tonnes |
Grade |
Ounces |
Grade |
Ounces |
|
M |
g/t |
M |
g/t |
M |
Proven |
2.6 |
5.39 |
0.449 |
2.82 |
0.235 |
Krumovgrad (Upper Zone) |
1.1 |
3.46 |
0.124 |
1.91 |
0.068 |
Krumovgrad (Wall) |
1.5 |
6.83 |
0.325 |
3.50 |
0.166 |
Probable |
3.6 |
3.08 |
0.358 |
1.79 |
0.208 |
Krumovgrad (Upper Zone) |
3.5 |
3.00 |
0.337 |
1.75 |
0.197 |
Krumovgrad (Wall) |
0.1 |
5.54 |
0.020 |
2.93 |
0.011 |
Proven and Probable |
6.2 |
4.04 |
0.807 |
2.22 |
0.443 |
Krumovgrad (Upper Zone) |
4.6 |
3.11 |
0.461 |
1.79 |
0.266 |
Krumovgrad (Wall) |
1.6 |
6.74 |
0.345 |
3.46 |
0.177 |
MINERAL RESOURCES |
|
GOLD |
SILVER |
|
Tonnes |
Grade |
Ounces |
Grade |
Ounces |
|
M |
g/t |
M |
g/t |
M |
Measured |
2.8 |
5.19 |
0.478 |
2.74 |
0.252 |
Krumovgrad (Upper Zone) |
1.1 |
3.46 |
0.125 |
1.91 |
0.069 |
Krumovgrad (Wall) |
1.7 |
6.32 |
0.353 |
3.27 |
0.183 |
Indicated |
4.1 |
2.92 |
0.382 |
1.73 |
0.226 |
Krumovgrad (Upper Zone) |
3.9 |
2.86 |
0.357 |
1.70 |
0.212 |
Krumovgrad (Wall) |
0.2 |
4.28 |
0.024 |
2.38 |
0.014 |
Measured and Indicated |
6.9 |
3.86 |
0.859 |
2.15 |
0.477 |
Krumovgrad (Upper Zone) |
5.0 |
2.99 |
0.482 |
1.75 |
0.281 |
Krumovgrad (Wall) |
1.9 |
6.13 |
0.377 |
3.19 |
0.196 |
Inferred |
0.3 |
1.30 |
0.013 |
1.06 |
0.011 |
Krumovgrad (Upper Zone) |
0.3 |
1.31 |
0.013 |
1.06 |
0.011 |
Krumovgrad (Wall) |
0.0 |
0.87 |
0.000 |
0.88 |
0.000 |
|
|
(1) |
The rounding of tonnage and grade figures has resulted in some
columns showing relatively minor discrepancies in sum
totals; |
(2) |
All Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves estimates have been
determined and reported in accordance with NI 43-101 and the
classification adopted by the CIM; |
(3) |
Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources are inclusive of
Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves; |
(4) |
Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves may be subject to legal,
political, environmental and other risks and
uncertainties; |
(5) |
Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves estimates have been
reviewed and prepared by CSA Global (UK) Ltd, a privately-owned
consulting company that provides multi-disciplinary services to the
global resources industry and is independent of the
Company; |
(6) |
Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves estimates are based on
long term metals prices of $1,250/oz Au and $23/oz Ag and
are as of December 31, 2013; and |
(7) |
Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves are based on a gold
cut-off grade of 0.6 g/t for the Upper Zone and Overburden and 0.8
g/t for the Wall. |
Capital Cost
The upfront Project capital cost estimate of $164.1 million
reflects the remainder of engineering costs, all construction,
direct and indirect, costs and commissioning, including an accuracy
allowance and contingency of $15.5 million. The total future
capital cost reflects the Project capital plus sustaining capital
through the operating period, and closure and rehabilitation costs.
The updated capital cost and the related financial analysis include
only incremental capital costs and excludes financing and sunk
costs.
The table below is a summary of the estimated upfront capital
costs required to complete the Project, together with the
additional capital expected to be incurred over the life of the
Project.
CAPITAL COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY |
Item |
Total ($M) |
|
Direct costs |
124.3 |
|
Indirect costs |
24.3 |
|
Accuracy Allowance and Contingency (12.5%) |
15.5 |
Total Upfront Capital Cost |
164.1 |
Sustaining capital |
12.5 |
Closure and rehabilitation costs |
14.7 |
TOTAL FUTURE CAPITAL |
191.3 |
Operating Costs
Operating costs are based on the mining and treatment of 775,000
tpy of ore, producing an annual average of 85,700 oz of gold and
38,700 oz of silver for the estimated life of the mine. Costs are
based on 2013 quotations for all materials and consumables.
SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED OPERATING COSTS |
Item |
$/t ore Processed (1) |
Mining costs |
12.10 |
Processing costs |
21.81 |
Tailings treatment & IMWF costs (2) |
2.50 |
General & administration |
3.71 |
Royalty |
4.01 |
Total Annual Cash Costs |
44.13 |
|
|
(1) |
Average cash cost over eight (8) years; and |
(2) |
Integrated Mine Waste Facility. |
Permitting Update
On October 4, 2013, the Administrative Court in Kardzhali issued
a Ruling, which overturned the refusal of the Krumovgrad Municipal
Council (the "Council") to issue permission for the preparation of
the detailed development plan ("DDP") and returned the matter to
the Council to decide on the Company's request within one month.
This Ruling was appealed by the Council before the three-member
panel of the Court, and on December 18, 2013, the appeal was
dismissed by the Court. The Council's final appeal to the five
member panel was heard on January 13, 2014, and, on February 10,
2014, the Court again ruled in favour of the Company. As a result,
the case was dismissed by the Court and may not be appealed
further. On March 7, 2014, the Council again considered the
Company's application and a majority of the Council voted not to
approve the Terms of Reference and the preparation of the DDP. The
Council's decision has been formally presented to the Governor of
the Kardzhali District for ratification, as required by Bulgarian
law. The Governor has refused to ratify the Council's decision and
returned the matter to the Council for further consideration. The
Company is in dialogue with the Council and its leadership
regarding calling a further meeting to again consider the DDP terms
of reference. Independent of the Governor's action, in order to
preserve its legal rights, the Company has filed an appeal of the
Council's decision with the Administrative Court in Kardzhali.
The Company maintains active dialogue with the government and
other stakeholders to build relationships and work towards securing
the remaining permits throughout 2013 and 2014. The Company remains
confident that the Council will eventually issue a favourable
decision on the DDP terms of reference, which in turn is expected
to facilitate obtaining the remaining local permits and approvals
allowing the Project to move forward to construction.
Should the Council continue to delay progress, DPM will defer
its scheduled ramp-up and take steps to limit spending to only
those activities necessary to secure the remaining local permits.
Provided the existing delays are resolved, commissioning of the
Project and the hand-over to operations are currently expected to
occur during the fourth quarter of 2016 or early in the first
quarter of 2017.
Technical Information
The Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates and other
scientific and technical information contained in this news release
was prepared by CSA Global (UK) Ltd. ("CSA"), in accordance with
Canadian regulatory requirements set out in National Instrument
43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, and
has been reviewed and approved by, as relates to Mineral Resources,
Galen White, BSc (Hons) FAusIMM FGS, Director and Principal
Consultant of CSA, and Julian Bennett, BSc ARSM FIMMM CEng, as
relates to Mineral Reserves. Both Galen White and Julian Bennett
are independent Qualified Persons ("QP"), as defined under NI
43-101. The NI 43-101 technical report (the "Technical Report")
entitled "NI 43-101 Technical Report, Ada Tepe Deposit, Krumovgrad
Project, Bulgaria" dated March 21, 2014, in respect of the study
for the construction and operation of its Krumovgrad gold project
disclosed herein, is being filed today on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
Simon Meik, Vice President, Processing, Jean Francois Laurin,
Project Director, Krumovgrad, and Edgar Urbaez, Corporate Director,
Technical Services, all of DPM, who are QPs and not independent of
the Company, have also reviewed and approved the contents of this
release.
The Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates contained
herein may be subject to legal, political, environmental or other
risks that could materially affect the potential development of
such Mineral Resources. See the Technical Report for more
information with respect to the key assumptions, parameters,
methods and risks of determination associated with the foregoing
Mineral Resource estimates.
Cautionary note to U.S. Investors concerning estimates of
Mineral Resources. These estimates have been prepared in accordance
with the requirements of Canadian securities laws, which differ
from the requirements of U.S. securities laws. The terms "mineral
resource", "measured mineral resource", "indicated mineral
resource" and "inferred mineral resource" are defined in NI 43-101
and recognized by Canadian securities laws but are not defined
terms under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")
Guide 7 ("SEC Guide 7") or recognized under U.S. securities laws.
U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of
mineral deposits in these categories will ever be upgraded to
mineral reserves. "Inferred mineral resources" have a great amount
of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to
their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all
or any part of an "inferred mineral resource" will ever by upgraded
to a higher category. Under Canadian securities laws, estimates of
"inferred mineral resources" may not form the basis of feasibility
or pre-feasibility studies. U.S. investors are cautioned not to
assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists
or is economically or legally mineable. Accordingly, these mineral
resource estimates and related information may not be comparable to
similar information made public by U.S. companies subject to the
reporting and disclosure requirements under the U.S. federal
securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder, including
SEC Guide 7.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This news release contains "forward-looking statements" that
involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking
statements include, but are not limited to, statements with respect
to the future price of gold and silver, the estimation of mineral
reserves and resources, the realization of mineral estimates, the
timing and amount of estimated future production and output, costs
of production, capital expenditures, costs and timing of the
development of new deposits, success of exploration activities,
permitting time lines, currency fluctuations, requirements for
additional capital, government regulation of mining operations,
environmental risks, unanticipated reclamation expenses, title
disputes or claims, limitations on insurance coverage and timing
and possible outcome of pending litigation. Often, but not always,
forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words
such as "plans", "expects", or "does not expect", "is expected",
"budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends",
"anticipates", or "does not anticipate", or "believes", or
variations of such words and phrases or state that certain actions,
events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will" be
taken, occur or be achieved. Forward-looking statements are based
on the opinions and estimates of management as of the date such
statements are made, and they involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results,
performance or achievements of the Company to be materially
different from any other future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking
statements. Such factors include, among others: the actual results
of current exploration activities; actual results of current
reclamation activities; conclusions of economic evaluations;
changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined;
future prices of gold, copper, zinc and silver; possible variations
in ore grade or recovery rates; failure of plant, equipment or
processes to operate as anticipated; accidents, labour disputes and
other risks of the mining industry; delays in obtaining
governmental approvals or financing or in the completion of
development or construction activities, fluctuations in metal
prices, as well as those risk factors discussed or referred to in
Management's Discussion and Analysis under the heading "Risks and
Uncertainties" and other documents filed from time to time with the
securities regulatory authorities in all provinces and territories
of Canada and available at www.sedar.com. Although the Company has
attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual
actions, events or results to differ materially from those
described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors
that cause actions, events or results not to be anticipated,
estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that
forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual
results and future events could differ materially from those
anticipated in such statements. Unless required by securities laws,
the Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking
statements if circumstances or management's estimates or opinions
should change. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place
undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
NON-IFRS FINANCIAL MEASURES
This news release refers to estimated EBITDA (defined as
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization),
cash cost per tonne of ore processed and cash cost per ounce of
AuEq because management and certain investors use this information
to assess the Company's performance and also determine the
Company's ability to generate cash flow for investing activities.
In addition, management utilizes these metrics as an important
management tool to monitor cost performance of the Company's
operations. These measurements have no standardized meaning under
International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") and may not be
comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. These
measurements are intended to provide additional information and
should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for
measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS.
DPM is a Canadian based, international gold mining company
engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development, mining and
processing of precious metals. The Company's principal operating
assets include the Chelopech operation, which produces a copper
concentrate containing gold and silver, located east of Sofia,
Bulgaria; the Kapan operation, which produces a copper concentrate
and a zinc concentrate both containing gold and silver, located in
southern Armenia; and the Tsumeb smelter, a concentrate processing
facility located in Namibia. DPM also holds interests in a number
of developing gold properties located in Bulgaria, Serbia, and
northern Canada, including interests held through its 53.1% owned
subsidiary, Avala Resources Ltd., its 45.5% interest in Dunav
Resources Ltd. and its 12.1% interest in Sabina Gold & Silver
Corp.
Dundee Precious Metals Inc.Rick HowesPresident & Chief
Executive Officer(416) 365-2836rhowes@dundeeprecious.comDundee
Precious Metals Inc.Lori BeakSenior Vice President, Investor &
RegulatoryAffairs and Corporate Secretary(416)
365-5165lbeak@dundeeprecious.com
Grafico Azioni Dundee Precious Metals (TSX:DPM)
Storico
Da Feb 2025 a Mar 2025
Grafico Azioni Dundee Precious Metals (TSX:DPM)
Storico
Da Mar 2024 a Mar 2025