SPDR Files For Emerging Market and Crossover Bond ETFs - ETF News And Commentary
10 Marzo 2012 - 3:34PM
Zacks
After the recent launches of SPDR MSCI EM 50
ETF (EMFT), and the SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI
ETF (ACIM) in the global equity space, State Street Global
Advisors has recently filed for two more funds the SPDR
BofA Merrill Lynch Emerging Markets Corporate Bond ETF
(EMCD) and the SPDR BofA Merrill Lynch Crossover
Corporate Bond ETF (XOVR). These diversified debt ETFs, if
given a green light by the SEC, could give investors two new
choices in SPDR’s quickly growing fixed income family.
EMCD and XOVR will, respectively, track the performance of the
BofA Merrill Lynch Emerging Markets Large Cap Senior Corporate
Index and the BofA Merrill Lynch US Diversified Crossover Corporate
Index. The former index tracks the emerging market senior and
secured corporate debt market whereas the latter tracks the U.S.
crossover corporate bond market. No information has been disclosed
in terms of the expense structure for either fund at time of
writing (see Go Local With Emerging Market Bond ETFs).
Though like most ETFs, these look to be passively managed funds,
yet they would not employ a full replication strategy. Instead,
their investment strategy and holdings would depend on a sampling
technique (minimum 80% of total assets), on specific securities
that best track the indexes in terms of risk-return
tradeoff. The remainder may be invested in other
non-indexed debt securities, money market instruments etc in order
to generate a positive alpha.
While the EMCD seeks to give investors holistic exposure in the
emerging market debt space, primarily by investing in
dollar-denominated debt securities traded in the U.S. and Eurobond
markets, XOVR seeks to capture the essence of “crossover bonds”
with the majority of investments going to U.S. dollar-denominated
BBB and BB rated debt paper. This segment represents
the region that falls at the lower end of investment grade and
the high end of the junk bond market. As a result, these securities
look to be higher risk than many investment grade bonds but could
also be safer than most of their junk bond counterparts (read
Follow Buffett With These Developed Market Bond ETFs).
Bond ETF Competition
The very concept and strategy of these two funds may seem
innovative and attractive, but it is prudent to note that there are
certain ETFs which target and caters to the same segment.
iShares JP Morgan Emerging Market Bond Fund (EMB)
has the features of both “emerging market debt” as well as
“crossover bonds.” EMB holds 71.14% of its assets in BBB or BB
rated debt papers and has a three year total return of 17.58%. It
charges investors 60 basis points as fees and expenses, a little
above the category average of 51 basis points.
In the high yield corporate bond space, iShares iBoxx $
High Yield Corp Bond Fund (HYG) could also pose some
competition. This fund invests in liquid, but
below investment grade, corporate debt, and has
performed quite well in the past three years, gaining 21.29%
in the period. The fund has been able to earn a decent
risk-adjusted return with its 3 year Sharpe ratio at 1.15. The
expense ratio stands at 50 basis points which is roughly in-line
with the category average (read Five Cheaper ETFs You Probably
Overlooked).
Investing in emerging market and crossover debt space has its
pros and cons. It is subject to geopolitical risk, economic risk,
default risk, and inflation risks, just to name a few. However, it
also gives the opportunity for the U.S investor to obtain above
average payouts compared to what they earn in the extremely low
yielding U.S. investment grade debt market (read Three Bond
ETFs For A Fixed Income Bear Market).
The demand for products giving exposure in these fields is ever
increasing among the U.S investors, therefore XOVR and EMCD are
likely to see decent inflows in their assets as suggested by the
inflows that other, similar funds have seen since their inceptions.
After all, both EMB and HYG have been around for a little more than
four years and have since then seen a considerable amount of
inflows and average trading volumes.
For EMB, the average volume continues to be one of the highest
in the category at just over one million shares while its assets
currently stand at about $4.13 billion. HYG on the other hand
maintains an average daily volume of 1.7 million shares and total
assets of $14.36 billion, suggesting there might be
significant demand for XOVR and EMCD if they ever pass the SEC’s
regulatory hurdles.
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research?
Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30
Days. Click to get this free report >>
To read this article on Zacks.com click here.
Zacks Investment Research
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research?
Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click
to get this free report
Grafico Azioni iShares JP Morgan USD Em... (NASDAQ:EMB)
Storico
Da Feb 2025 a Mar 2025
Grafico Azioni iShares JP Morgan USD Em... (NASDAQ:EMB)
Storico
Da Mar 2024 a Mar 2025