Electronic Availability of Proxy Statement and Annual Report
As permitted under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, Halcón is making this proxy statement and its
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 available to its stockholders electronically via the Internet. On or about April 12, 2019,
Halcón mailed a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the "Notice") to its stockholders of record as of the close of business on April 1, 2019, which Notice sets
forth instructions for accessing Halcón's proxy materials electronically and instructions on how a stockholder can request to receive paper or e-mail copies of Halcón's
proxy materials.
Voting and Revocation of Proxies
If you provide specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted as you instruct. Whether you hold shares directly as a stockholder of
record, or beneficially in street name, you may direct how your shares are voted at the annual meeting. If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote by submitting a proxy or by voting in person at
the annual meeting, and if you hold your shares in street name, you may vote by submitting voting instructions to your broker, trustee or other nominee. You may cast your vote by proxy as
follows:
-
-
Internet at
www.proxyvote.com
by following the instructions on the Notice, or if you received
proxy materials by mail, the proxy card;
-
-
Telephone by calling 1-800-579-1639 and following the voice prompts; or
-
-
Mailing the completed, signed and dated proxy card if you received proxy materials by mail, in the pre-addressed postage-paid envelope enclosed
therewith.
1
Table of Contents
Unless
you otherwise direct in your proxy, the individuals named in the proxy card will vote the shares represented by such proxy in accordance with the recommendations of our board of
directors. If you hold your shares in street name, please refer to the proxy card forwarded by your broker, trustee or other nominee to see which voting options are available to you and for
instructions on how to vote. If you vote by Internet or by telephone, you need not return your proxy card. Proxies granted by telephone or over the Internet, in accordance with the procedures set
forth on the proxy card, will be valid under Delaware law.
If
you sign the proxy card of your broker, trustee or other nominee but do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted unless your broker, trustee or other nominee has
discretionary authority to vote. When a broker, trustee or other nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner is unable to vote on a particular proposal because such broker, trustee or other nominee
does not have discretionary authority to vote in the absence of timely instructions from the beneficial owner, this is referred to as a "broker non-vote."
Out of the two
proposals that will be brought to a vote at our annual meeting, brokers will have discretionary voting authority only with respect to the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered
public accounting firm. It is therefore very important that you indicate on the proxy card of your broker, trustee or other nominee how you want your shares to be voted in the election of the three
director nominees named in this proxy statement
.
The
board of directors is not aware of any business to be brought before the annual meeting other than as indicated in the Notice. If any other matter does come before the meeting, the
persons named in the proxy card will vote the shares represented by the proxy in his or her best judgment.
Revocation of Proxy.
A proxy may be revoked by a stockholder at any time prior to it being voted by:
-
-
delivering a revised proxy (by one of the methods described above) bearing a later date;
-
-
voting in person at the annual meeting; or
-
-
notifying our Corporate Secretary of the revocation in writing at our address set forth above in time to be received before the annual meeting.
Attendance
at the meeting alone will not effectively revoke a previously executed and delivered proxy. If a proxy is properly executed and is not revoked by the stockholder, the shares
it represents will be voted at the meeting in accordance with the instructions from the stockholder. If the proxy card is signed and returned without specifying choices, the shares will be voted in
accordance with the recommendations of our board of directors. If your shares are held in an account at a broker, trustee or other nominee, you should contact your broker, trustee or other nominee to
change your vote.
Record Date and Vote Required for Approval.
The record date with respect to this solicitation is April 1, 2019. Our voting stock
consists of
issued and outstanding shares of our common stock. All holders of record of our common stock as of the close of business on April 1, 2019 are entitled to vote at the annual meeting and any
adjournment or postponement thereof for which a new record date has not been established. As of the record date, we had 164,331,378 shares of common stock outstanding and no shares of preferred stock
outstanding. Each share of common stock entitles its holder to one vote on each matter submitted to our stockholders. Our stockholders do not have cumulative voting rights. In accordance with our
bylaws, the holders of a majority of our common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the annual meeting, represented in person or by proxy, shall constitute a
quorum at the annual meeting. If a quorum is not present at the annual meeting, a vote for adjournment will be taken among the stockholders present or represented by proxy. If a majority of the
stockholders present or represented by proxy vote for adjournment, it is our intention to adjourn the meeting until a later date and to vote proxies received at such adjourned meeting. The place and
date to which the annual meeting would be adjourned would be announced at the meeting, but would in no event be expected to be more than 30 days after the date of the annual meeting.
2
Table of Contents
Election
of director nominees requires that each director be elected by a majority of the votes present in person or represented by proxy at the annual meeting and entitled to vote on
this matter, thus the number of shares voted "for" a nominee must exceed the number of shares voted "against" such nominee. For purposes of determining the outcome for each nominee broker non-votes
will not be counted as entitled to vote and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. Abstentions will effectively count as votes "against" because they are considered entitled to vote.
Ratification
of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accountant requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of voting
stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on this matter.
Proxy Solicitation.
We will bear all costs relating to the solicitation of proxies. We have retained Okapi Partners LLC to aid in
the
solicitation of proxies, at an estimated cost of $9,000, plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, custodial charges in connection with payment by Okapi Partners LLC of charges of brokers
and banks on our behalf, and additional charges which may be incurred in connection with the solicitation of proxies by telephone. Proxies may also be solicited by officers, directors and employees
personally, by mail, or by telephone, facsimile transmission or other electronic means. On request, we will pay brokers and other persons holding shares of stock in their names or in those of their
nominees, which in each case are beneficially owned by others, for their reasonable expenses in sending soliciting material to, and seeking instructions from, their principals.
Submission of Stockholder Proposals.
The deadline for submitting stockholder proposals for inclusion in our proxy statement for our
annual meeting in
2020 is December 13, 2019. See "
Submission of Stockholder Proposals for Our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
" below for additional
information.
We will provide to any stockholder, without charge and upon written request, a copy (without exhibits, unless otherwise specified) of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. Any such request should be directed to Quentin Hicks, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
at 1801 California Street, Suite 3500, Denver, Colorado 80202. The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 is not part of the proxy solicitation
materials.
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEES
The Board of Directors
Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our board of directors, or board. Our bylaws specify that we shall not have less
than one nor more than fifteen directors, and our board currently has seven members. Under our amended and restated bylaws, as amended, or "bylaws," and our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation, or "certificate of incorporation," each director holds office until the next annual meeting of stockholders at which such director's class stands for re-election and serves until the
director's successor is duly elected and qualified, or until such director's earlier death, resignation or removal. Our certificate of incorporation provides that our board is classified into three
classes: Class A, Class B and Class C, each class having a three-year term of office or until their successors are elected and qualified. Under Delaware law, stockholders of a
corporation with a classified board may only remove a director "for cause" unless the certificate of incorporation provides otherwise. Our certificate of incorporation provides that any director may
be removed, with or without cause, by a majority of the shares entitled to vote at an election of directors. The likely effect of the classification of the board and the limitations on the removal of
directors is an increase in the time required for the stockholders to change the composition of the board. For example, because only one class of the directors may be replaced by stockholder vote at
each annual meeting of stockholders, stockholders seeking to replace a majority of the members of our board will need at least two annual meetings of stockholders to effect this change unless they are
able to secure the vote of the holders of a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock to remove directors.
3
Table of Contents
As
discussed more fully under "
Proposal 1Election of Directors
," three of our current directors, Janine J. McArdle, Darryl L.
Schall and Nathan W. Walton have been nominated for re-election at the 2019 annual meeting because of the expiration of the term of their class, Class C, on our board. If each nominee for
director receives a majority of votes cast in favor of his or her continued service on the board, each will serve a three-year term expiring in 2022. Due to resignations, we currently do not have any
directors in Class A. We plan to re-balance director classes well in advance of our annual stockholder meeting in 2020 to correct the current imbalance.
The
following table sets forth the names and ages of all of our current directors, the positions and offices with us held by such persons, the years in which their current terms as
directors expire and the length of their continuous service as a director:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Director
Since
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Expiration
of Term
|
|
William J. Campbell
|
|
|
Sep. 2016
|
|
|
60
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2021
|
|
James W. Christmas
|
|
|
Feb. 2012
|
|
|
71
|
|
Chairman
|
|
|
2021
|
|
Michael L. Clark
|
|
|
Sep. 2016
|
|
|
47
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2021
|
|
Janine J. McArdle
|
|
|
June 2018
|
|
|
58
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Darryl L. Schall
|
|
|
Sep. 2016
|
|
|
58
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Ronald D. Scott
|
|
|
Sep. 2016
|
|
|
60
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2021
|
|
Nathan W. Walton
|
|
|
Sep. 2016
|
|
|
41
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2019
|
|
William J. Campbell
has served as a director since September 2016, served as Chairman of the Compensation Committee until March 2019, and
currently serves as a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Reserves Committee. Mr. Campbell is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cima
Inspection LLC, a 9-year old Pasadena-based Non Destructive Testing company. He also serves as Managing Director and Co-owner of CB Energy, LLC, an independent oil and gas exploration
company founded in 1997. He has over thirty three years of experience in the legal, investment and energy industries with a diverse background in management, finance/banking, legal, land and
marketing. Since 2006, Mr. Campbell has served as owner and managing director of PPPCo-CB Energy, LLC, a Houston, Texas-based private oil and gas exploration and production company. From
1991 to 1996, Mr. Campbell served as Principal, Vice President and Corporate Counsel of Houston, Texas-based Fremont Energy Corporation, a Bechtel Family company, where Mr. Campbell
managed the company's domestic and international energy asset portfolio and directed the company's commercial, banking, and legal activities, and from 1985 through 1991, Mr. Campbell served as
Counsel and Manager for Bechtel Investments, Inc. in Houston, Texas, managing its oil and gas marketing and land/legal operations. Mr. Campbell was also the first representative of
Bechtel in the J.P. Morgan Corporate Finance Program, New York, New York (1988). In addition, Mr. Campbell represented Bechtel's outside oil and gas interests by serving as a Director on the
board of directors of BecField Drilling Services, the then largest independent horizontal and directional drilling company in the United States, CurveDrill, Inc. and PetroSource Corporation, a
refining and marketing company with annual revenues over $500 million. Mr. Campbell started his professional career at the Houston, Texas law firm of Reynolds, Allen & Cook.
Mr. Campbell has a Doctorate of Jurisprudence (J.D.) and holds a Bachelor of Business Administration Degree (BBA) in Petroleum Land Management/Finance from the University of Texas in Austin,
Texas. Mr. Campbell is active in community and civic affairs. His service includes: The Kinkaid School Board of Trustees of Houston since 2007, and its Advancement, Finance & Building
Committees since 2002; the Board of Directors of the Houston Country Club from 2005 to 2007; the Institute for Molecular Medicine as a Founding Trustee and Scientific Advisory Board Member since 2001;
the Development Board of the University of Texas Health Science Center since 1991Chair Emeritus 2002-2003; the Advisory Boards of Tanglewood Bank, NA and the Amegy Bank of Texas, N.A.
since 1998; the Endowment Board, Jr. Warden and Senior Council Representative of St. Martin's Episcopal Church since 2004; the Board of Directors and Treasurer of the Daniel and Edith Ripley
Foundation since 2005; the Board of Directors of the Bayou
4
Table of Contents
City
Pump Inc. since 2010; the Board of Directors of Erin Energy Corporation and its Audit and Compensation Committees since 2011; the Advance Team Board of M.D. Anderson since 2005; the Texas
Children's Hospital Individuals Committee since 2005; the Memorial Hermann System Board of Directors and its Finance, Compensation and ChairmanGovernance Committees and Memorial Hermann
Foundation since 2011 and a Member of the Texas Bar Association. Mr. Campbell's qualifications to serve on the board include over thirty years of experience in the legal, investment and energy
industries, management of domestic and international energy asset portfolios and extensive professional background provide valuable contributions to the Company's board of directors.
James W. Christmas
has served as a director since February 2012 and as Lead Independent Director from January 2015 until becoming Chairman
of the Board in February 2019. Mr. Christmas served as Chairman of the Audit Committee and as a member of the Compensation Committee until March 2019. Previously, Mr. Christmas served as
a director of Petrohawk Energy Corporation from July 2006, effective upon the merger of KCS Energy, Inc. ("KCS") into Petrohawk, and continued to serve as a director, and as Vice Chairman of
the Board of Directors, for Petrohawk until BHP Billiton acquired Petrohawk in August 2011. He also served on the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Petrohawk.
Mr. Christmas served as a member of the Board of Directors of Petrohawk, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of BHP Billiton, and as chair of the Financial Reporting Committee of such board until
September 2014. He also serves on the Board of Governors of St. John's University. Mr. Christmas serves as a director of Yuma Energy, and as Chairman of its Audit Committee and as a
member of its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Previously, Mr. Christmas served as a director of Rice Energy, as chairman of its audit committee and a member of its compensation
committee from January 2014 until its merger with EQT Corporation in November 2017. He served as President and Chief Executive Officer of KCS from 1988 until April 2003 and Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of KCS since then until its merger into Petrohawk. Mr. Christmas was a Certified Public Accountant in New York and was with Arthur Andersen & Co. from 1970
until 1978 before leaving to join National Utilities & Industries ("NUI"), a diversified energy company, as Vice President and Controller. He remained with NUI until 1988, when NUI spun out its
unregulated activities that ultimately became part of KCS. As an auditor and audit manager, controller and in his role as CEO of KCS, Mr. Christmas was directly or indirectly responsible for
financial reporting and compliance with SEC regulations, and as such has extensive experience in reviewing and evaluating financial reports, as well as in evaluating executive and board performance
and in recruiting directors. Mr. Christmas's qualifications to serve on the board include his experience as an executive, service as a director and committee member combined with his extensive
audit, accounting and financial reporting experience provide significant contributions to the Company's board.
Michael L. Clark
has served as a director since September 2016 and currently serves as Chairman of the Compensation Committee and as a
member of the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Until March 2019, Mr. Clark served as Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. He is
also a director of privately-held Laws Whiskey House, an award winning craft distiller and is a director of Nasdaq-listed Workhorse Group, a manufacturer of electric delivery vans, where he serves on
the Audit and Compensation Committees. Mr. Clark has also served as a director of Paragon Offshore Ltd., as Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee and a member
of its Audit Committee from July 2017 until its sale to Borr Drilling Limited in March 2018. Mr. Clark is a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) Charterholder with over seventeen years of
investing experience focusing on basic materials and oilfield services and equipment equities. Mr. Clark was a Retired Partner of SIR Capital Management, LLC from 2014 until his
departure in 2016 and from 2008 to 2013 served as a Portfolio Manager and Partner. Prior to that, Mr. Clark valued energy equities as a Portfolio Manager at Satellite Asset
Management, LLC from 2005 to 2007 and as an Equity Research Analyst at SAC Capital Management, LLC from 2003 to 2005 and at Merrill Lynch from 1997 to 2002. Mr. Clark began his
career at Deloitte & Touche, LLP, progressing to Senior Auditor. He is a Certified Public Accountant licensed in New York State and also holds the Accredited in Business Valuation (ABV)
credential awarded by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The National Association of
5
Table of Contents
Corporate
Directors (NACD) recognized him as a NACD Governance Fellow in 2017. Mr. Clark graduated cum laude from the University of Pennsylvania with a Bachelor of Arts in Economics and earned
a Masters of Business Administration in Finance and Economics with Distinction (Top 10%) from New York University's Stern School of Business. Mr. Clark's qualifications to serve on the board
include his wealth of accounting, financial and investment knowledge and experience in the energy industry provide significant contributions to the Company's board.
Janine J. McArdle
has served as a director of Halcón since June 2018 and currently serves as Chairman of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee and a member of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Reserves Committee. Ms. McArdle has been an executive in the oil and gas industry for over
30 years with extensive experience in engineering, marketing, business development, finance and risk management. Ms. McArdle is currently founder and CEO of Apex Strategies LLC, a
global consultancy company providing advisory services to companies engaged in the midstream and downstream sectors of the energy industry. Prior to forming her own company, Ms. McArdle was an
Executive Officer at Apache Corporation from 2002 to 2015. During that time, she also served as President of Kitimat LNG, Senior Vice President Global Gas Monetization, and Senior Vice President of
Global Oil and Gas Marketing. Prior to Apache, Ms. McArdle served as President and Managing Director for Aquila Europe Ltd. from 2001 to 2002 and held executive and management positions
with Aquila Energy Marketing from 1993 to 2001, including Vice President Trading and Vice President Mergers and Acquisitions. She served as a member of the board of directors for Intercontinental
Exchange, the electronic trading platform, from 2000 to 2002. Previously, Ms. McArdle was a partner in Hesse Gas from 1991 to 1993. Ms. McArdle graduated from the University of Nebraska
with a Bachelor of Science in Chemical Engineering, earned a Master of Business Administration in Finance from the University of Houston, a CERT Certificate in Cybersecurity from Carnegie Mellon's
Software Engineering Institute, and a Governance Fellowship from the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD). Ms. McArdle currently serves on the Advisory Board for the College of
Engineering at the University of Nebraska and, previously, on the Board of Directors of the Palmer Drug Abuse Program.
Darryl L. Schall
has served as a director since September 2016 and currently serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee and as a member of
the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Schall previously served as a Partner and Portfolio Manager in the Ares Private Equity Group, where he was responsible for managing Ares'
special situations strategy until his retirement in January 2017, and subsequently served as an Advisor to Ares Management LLC through July 2017. Prior to joining Ares in 2009,
Mr. Schall worked at Tudor Investment Corporation, where he focused on managing distressed and high yield investments. Previously, Mr. Schall was a Managing Director and Director of High
Yield Research at Trust Company of the West, where he focused on managing portfolios of distressed and high yield debt. In addition, Mr. Schall was a Senior Research Analyst and Senior Vice
President at Dabney/Resnick & Wagner, Inc., a boutique investment firm specializing in high yield and distressed debt. Previously, Mr. Schall was an Investment Banking Associate
of the Corporate Finance Department of Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc. and was a Supervising Senior Accountant with KPMG Peat Marwick. Mr. Schall holds a B.A., cum laude, from the University
of California, Los Angeles, in History and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago. Mr. Schall also is a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Schall's qualifications to serve on the board
include his vast experience managing
investment portfolios and extensive knowledge financial and accounting matters provide valuable contributions to the Company's board.
Ronald D. Scott
has served as a director since September 2016 and currently serves as Chairman of the Reserves Committee and a member of
the Compensation Committee. Mr. Scott has over thirty years oil and gas industry experience. Mr. Scott is a director of Gastar Exploration, Inc., a publicly traded energy firm. He
serves on the Reserves Committee and the Compensation Committee of Gastar. In addition, Mr. Scott serves as a director of Blackbrush Oil and Gas, Verdad Resources and Elk Hills Power, all
privately held energy companies. Previously, Mr. Scott was a member of the Board of Directors of Clayton
6
Table of Contents
Williams
Energy, Inc. serving from September 2016 until the sale of the company in April 2017. He also served as a member of the Board of Directors of Pardus Energy from June 2016 until the
sale of the company in November 2017. Mr. Scott chaired the Reserves Committee and the Compensation Committee while serving on the Pardus Energy board. Mr. Scott is the Chief Executive
Officer of Development Capital Resources. Previously, Mr. Scott served as President and CEO of True Oil Company, a private equity backed oil and gas firm. Prior to True Oil he worked for Henry
Petroleum as President and Chief Operating Officer of that company and its successor companies, Henry Resources and HPC Energy. During this time, Mr. Scott successfully led the sale and
re-start of multiple operating oil and gas entities. Beginning his career with Exxon Corporation, from 1983 to 1995, Mr. Scott held various supervisory and managerial assignments in
Engineering, Operations, Planning and Financial Accounting and Reporting. In addition to the Permian Basin, he had assignments covering operational areas in the Gulf Coast/Gulf of Mexico region,
California and the Rocky Mountains. Mr. Scott was the Technical Manager for Exxon's multi-billion dollar onshore operations in the Western United States prior to joining Henry Petroleum. In
addition to the above, Mr. Scott served as an independent contract, non-employee consultant to Ares Management from approximately October 2016 to June 2017 providing services as a contract,
independent Operating Advisor. Mr. Scott serves as Vice President of the Board of the Henry Foundation, as a founding member of Educate Midland, a non-profit focused on public education, and on
the board of directors of the Midland, Texas Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Scott holds Master and Bachelor of Science degrees in Engineering from New Mexico State University and is a Registered
Petroleum Engineer in the State of Texas. Mr. Scott's qualifications to serve on the board include his more than thirty years in the oil and gas industry, leadership experience and technical
expertise as a petroleum engineer provide significant contributions to the Company's board.
Nathan W. Walton
has served as a director since September 2016. Mr. Walton is a Partner and Co-Head of North American Private
Equity within the Ares Private Equity Group and a member of the Management Committee of Ares Management. He joined the firm in 2006. Mr. Walton serves on the Ares Private Equity Group's ACOF
Investment Committee. He also serves on the Board of Directors of Development Capital Resources, LP, EPIC Midstream Holdings, LP, Gastar Exploration, Inc., Salt Creek
Midstream LLC, Verdad Resources LLC and the parent company of BlackBrush Oil & Gas LP. Mr. Walton holds a B.A. from Princeton University in Politics and an M.B.A.
from the Stanford
Graduate School of Business. Mr. Walton's qualifications to serve on the board include his vast knowledge of the oil and natural gas exploration and production industry, his directorship
experience and investment expertise in the energy industry provide significant contributions to the Company's board.
Meetings of Our Board of Directors and Committees of the Board
Our board of directors has the responsibility for establishing our broad corporate policies and for our overall performance. However, the board
is not involved in our day-to-day operations. The board is kept informed of our business through discussions with our executive officers and other key personnel, by reviewing analyses and reports
provided to it on a regular basis, and by participating in board and committee meetings. Our board held twelve (12) meetings during 2018, including telephonic meetings, and acted by unanimous
written consent five (5) times, and each director attended at least 75% of the total meetings of the board and the committee(s) on which such director serves during the period that such
director served as a director or on such committee(s).
Our
board currently has four standing committees: Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Reserves. Actions taken by our committees are reported to the full board.
Each committee conducts an annual evaluation of its duties and is expected to conduct an annual review of its charter and also has authority to retain, set the compensation for, and terminate
consultants, outside counsel and other advisers as that committee determines to be appropriate.
7
Table of Contents
Audit Committee.
The members of our Audit Committee through the filing date of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31,
2018, were James W. Christmas, Janine McArdle and Darryl L. Schall, with Mr. Christmas serving as the chairman. Mr. Christmas left the Audit Committee subsequent to the filing of our
Form 10-K in connection with the enhanced responsibilities he assumed on an interim basis following the departure of certain members of our senior leadership team. Upon Mr. Christmas'
departure from the Audit Committee, Michael L. Clark was added to the Audit Committee, and Mr. Schall was appointed chairman of the Audit Committee. Our board has determined that all members of
our Audit Committee are financially literate within the meaning of SEC rules, under the current listing standards of the NYSE and in accordance with our audit committee charter. Our board has also
determined that all members of the Audit Committee are independent, within the meaning of SEC and NYSE regulations for independence for audit committee members, under our corporate governance
guidelines, and in accordance with our audit committee charter. Our board determined that Messrs. Christmas and Schall are each an "audit committee financial expert" (as
defined under SEC rules) because each possesses: (i) an understanding of generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and financial statements; (ii) the
ability to assess the general application of such principles in connection with the accounting for estimates, accruals and reserves; (iii) experience analyzing and evaluating financial
statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by our
financial statements; (iv) an understanding of internal control over financial reporting; and (v) an understanding of audit committee functions. Messrs. Christmas and Schall
acquired these attributes through their respective educational backgrounds and by having held various positions that provided relevant experience, as described in their respective biographies under
"
Our Board of Directors and Its CommitteesThe Board of Directors
" above.
The
Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of Company risks relating to accounting matters, financial reporting and related legal and regulatory compliance. The Audit Committee
annually considers the qualifications and evaluates the performance of our independent auditor and selects and engages our independent auditor. The Audit Committee meets quarterly with representatives
of the independent auditor and is available to meet at the request of the independent auditor. During these meetings, the Audit Committee receives reports regarding our books of accounts, accounting
procedures, financial statements, audit policies and procedures, internal accounting and financial controls, and other matters within the scope of the Audit Committee's duties. The Audit Committee
reviews the plans for and the results of audits for us and our subsidiaries. The Audit Committee reviews the independence of the independent auditor, and considers and authorizes the fees for both
audit and non-audit services provided by the independent auditor. In 2018, our Audit Committee held five (5) meetings.
The
written charter of the Audit Committee adopted by our board is available on our website at
www.halconresources.com
.
Compensation Committee.
The members of our Compensation Committee through the filing date of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended
December 31, 2018, were William J. Campbell, James W. Christmas and Michael L. Clark, with Mr. Campbell serving as the chairman. Messrs. Campbell and Christmas left the
Compensation Committee in March 2019 and were replaced by Ms. McArdle and Mr. Scott, with Mr. Clark serving as chairman. Our board has determined that each member of the
Compensation Committee meets the NYSE standards for independence, and is a "non-employee director" as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"), an "outside director" as defined for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and meets the enhanced independence requirements set forth in
Rule 10C-1 under the Exchange Act.
The
Compensation Committee is entrusted with the overall responsibility for establishing, implementing and monitoring the compensation for our executive officers, administers the
Halcón Resources Corporation 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended, the "Plan"), and approves awards
8
Table of Contents
and
other stock-based grants under the Plan for our executive officers. In 2018, our Compensation Committee held six (6) meetings, including telephonic meetings.
Our
Compensation Committee engaged Longnecker & Associates, Inc. ("Longnecker"), an outside independent compensation consulting firm, to assist the board and the
Compensation Committee in crafting our total compensation program for our executive officers for 2018 and to assist the board in determining compensation for our non-employee directors. In connection
with its engagement, Longnecker was tasked with, among other things, making recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding an appropriate compensation peer group, assisting the Compensation
Committee in establishing a competitive executive compensation program and making recommendations and providing analysis regarding the compensation of our executive officers, including the named
executive officers, discussed below under the heading "
Executive Compensation
."
The
written charter of the Compensation Committee adopted by our board is available on our website at
www.halconresources.com
.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
The members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee through the filing date
of our
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, were William J. Campbell, Michael L. Clark, Janine J. McArdle, and Darryl L. Schall, with Mr. Clark serving as the chairman.
Mr. Clark stepped down as chairman in March 2019 in connection with his becoming chairman of the Compensation Committee, at which time Ms. McArdle was appointed chairman. Our board has
determined that all members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent pursuant to the NYSE rules, under our corporate governance guidelines, and in accordance with our
nominating and corporate governance committee charter.
Our
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying qualified candidates to be presented to our board for nomination as directors, ensuring that our board
and our organizational documents are structured in a way that best serves our practices and objectives, and developing and recommending a set of corporate governance principles. The Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee may consider candidates for our board from any reasonable source, including a search firm engaged by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, recommendations
of the board, management or, in accordance with the procedures set forth in our bylaws, our stockholders. In 2018, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held five (5) meetings,
including telephonic meetings and acted by unanimous written consent three (3) times.
The
written charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee adopted by our board is available on our website at
www.halconresources.com
.
Reserves Committee.
The members of our Reserves Committee as of the filing date of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31,
2018, were Janine J. McArdle, Darryl L. Schall and Ronald D. Scott, with Mr. Scott serving as the chairman. Thomas R. Fuller was a member of the Reserves Committee and served as its chairman
until his resignation from our board effective February 25, 2019, at which time Mr. Scott was appointed chairman and Ms. McArdle joined the committee. Mr. Schall left the
Reserves Committee in April 2019, and Mr. Campbell was appointed to the Reserves Committee at that time. Our Reserves Committee is composed solely of non-employee directors who are independent
under our corporate governance guidelines and in accordance with our reserves committee charter. Our Reserves Committee assists our board with oversight in the preparation by independent petroleum
engineers of annual and any special reserve reports and/or audits of the estimated amounts of our consolidated hydrocarbon reserves and related information. The Reserves Committee selects, engages and
determines funding for the independent petroleum engineers who evaluate our hydrocarbon reserves and also determines their independence from the Company in accordance with, among other things, the
Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers. In 2018, our Reserves Committee held six (6) meetings,
including telephonic meetings.
9
Table of Contents
The
written charter of the Reserves Committee adopted by our board is available on our website at
www.halconresources.com
.
Corporate Governance Matters
Corporate Governance Web Page and Available Documents.
We maintain a corporate governance page on our website at
www.halconresources.com/investors/corporate-governance
where you can find the following documents:
-
-
our Corporate Governance Guidelines;
-
-
our Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers;
-
-
our Code of Conduct;
-
-
our Amended and Restated Insider Trading Policy;
-
-
our Regulation FD Policy;
-
-
our Amended and Restated Equity-Based Incentive Grant Policy; and
-
-
charters of our Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Reserves Committees.
Notwithstanding
any reference to our website contained in this proxy statement, the information you may find on our website is not part of this proxy statement. We will provide a printed
copy of these documents, without charge, to stockholders who request copies in writing from Quentin R. Hicks, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Halcón Resources
Corporation, 1801 California Street, Suite 3500, Denver, Colorado 80202.
Director Independence.
The current listing standards of the NYSE require our board to affirmatively determine the independence of each
director and
to disclose such determination in the proxy statement for each annual meeting of our stockholders. The board, on February 27, 2019, affirmatively determined that each of William J. Campbell,
James W. Christmas, Michael L. Clark, Janine J. McArdle, Darryl L. Schall, Ronald D. Scott and Nathan W. Walton is an "independent director" under the guidelines described below and the independence
rules of the NYSE codified in Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
In
connection with its assessment of independence, our board reviewed information regarding relevant relationships, arrangements or transactions between the Company and each director or
parties affiliated with such director. Our board has established the following standards for determining director independence in our corporate governance guidelines:
A
majority of the directors on our board must be "independent." No director qualifies as "independent" unless the board affirmatively determines that the director has no "material
relationship" with Halcón, either directly, or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with Halcón. A "material relationship" is a
relationship that the board determines, after a consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances, compromises the director's independence from management. Our board's determination of
independence must be consistent with all applicable requirements of the NYSE, the SEC, and any other applicable legal requirements. Our board may adopt specific standards or guidelines for
independence in its discretion from time to time, consistent with those requirements. As set forth in the NYSE Listed Company Manual Section 303A.02, our board must consider the following
factors that preclude a finding by the board of a member's or prospective member's "independence" from Halcón:
1. A
director who is, or who has been within the last three years, an employee of Halcón (including in each case subsidiaries or parent entities in a
consolidated group), or an immediate family member who is, or has been within the last three years, an executive officer, of Halcón;
10
Table of Contents
2. A
director who has received, or has an immediate family member who has received, during any twelve-month period within the last three years, more than $120,000 in direct
compensation from Halcón, other than director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent in
any way on continued service); provided, that, compensation received by a director for former service as an interim Chairman or Chief Executive Officer or other executive officer need not be
considered in determining independence under
this test, and compensation received by an immediate family member for service as an employee of Halcón need not be considered in determining independence under this test;
3. (A)
A director is a current partner or employee of a firm that is Halcón's internal or external auditor; (B) a director who has an immediate family
member who is a current partner of such a firm; (C) a director who has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such a firm and who participates in Halcón's audit;
or (D) a director or an immediate family member who was within the last three years (but is no longer) a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on Halcón's
audit within that time;
4. A
director or an immediate family member who is, or who has been within the last three years, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of
Halcón's present executive officers at the same time serves or served on that company's compensation committee;
5. A
director who is a current employee, or an immediate family member who is a current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from,
Halcón for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1,000,000, or 2% of such other company's consolidated gross revenues;
6. Whether
the director has any other relationship with Halcón, either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a
relationship with Halcón; and
7. Whether
the director is aware of any other relationships that could potentially interfere, or could appear to interfere, with his exercise of independent judgment in
carrying out the responsibilities of a director, including (i) any transaction, arrangement or relationship, in the last fiscal year, involving the director, including any family members, and
any other officer or director of Halcón; or (ii) any other relationship with Halcón, either directly or as a stockholder, executive officer or partner or an
organization that has such a relationship, including any relationships with charitable, educational, political or other not-for-profit organizations.
For
purposes of determining "independence" of a director based on the tests set forth above, among other things, the following applies:
A. In
applying the test in paragraph 5 above, both the payments and the consolidated gross revenues to be measured are those reported in the last completed fiscal
year. The look-back provision for this test applies solely to the financial relationship between Halcón and the director or immediate family member's current employer;
Halcón is not required to consider former employment of the director or the immediate family member.
B. For
purposes of paragraph 5 above, contributions to tax exempt organizations are not considered "payments," although Halcón still considers the
"materiality" of any such relationship in determining the "independence" of a director.
C. For
purposes of determining "independence," an "immediate family member" includes a person's spouse, parents, children, siblings, mothers and fathers-in-law, sons and
daughters-in-law, brothers and sisters-in-law, and anyone (other than a domestic employee) who shares such person's home, and does not include individuals who are no longer immediate family members as
a result of legal separation or divorce, or those who have died or become incapacitated.
11
Table of Contents
Our
corporate governance guidelines set forth our policy with respect to qualifications of the members of the board, the standards of director independence, director responsibilities,
board meetings, director access to management and independent advisors, director orientation and continuing education, director compensation, chairman and chief executive officer dual
responsibilities, management evaluation and succession, annual performance evaluation of the board, and executive sessions.
Nomination Process.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider stockholder nominees for election as directors. Any
stockholder
nominations must be received by us not less than sixty (60) days nor more than ninety (90) days prior to the annual meeting; provided however, that in the event that less than seventy
(70) days notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting is given or made to stockholders, notice by the stockholder, to be timely, must be received no later than the close of
business on the tenth (10th) day following the day on which such notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made, whichever first occurs. Nominations should be
delivered to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee at the following address: Halcón Resources Corporation Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, c/o
Halcón Resources Corporation, Attention: Corporate Secretary, 1000 Louisiana St., Suite 1500, Houston, Texas 77002. The stockholder's nomination notice must set forth:
(i) as to each person whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election or re-election as a director: (a) the name, age, business address and residence address of the person;
(b) the principal occupation or employment and business experience of the person for at least the previous five years; (c) the class and number of shares of our capital stock which are
beneficially owned by the person; and (d) any other information relating to the person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations for proxies for election of directors pursuant to the
rules and regulations of the SEC under Section 14 of the Exchange Act; and (ii) as to the stockholder giving the notice: (a) the name and record address of the stockholder; and
(b) the class and number of shares of our capital stock beneficially owned by the stockholder. Such submission must be accompanied by the written consent of the proposed nominee to be named as
a nominee and to serve as a director, if elected. We may require any proposed nominee to furnish such other information as may reasonably be required by us to determine the eligibility of such
proposed nominee to serve as a director.
In
considering possible candidates for election as a director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is guided by the principles that each director should be an individual of
high character and integrity and have:
-
-
independence;
-
-
wisdom;
-
-
an understanding and general acceptance of our corporate philosophies;
-
-
business or professional knowledge and experience that can address our challenges and opportunities, and contribute meaningfully to the
deliberations of our board of directors;
-
-
a proven record of accomplishment with an excellent organization;
-
-
an inquiring mind;
-
-
a willingness to speak one's mind;
-
-
an ability to challenge and stimulate management; and
-
-
a willingness to commit time and energy to our business affairs.
In
considering possible candidates for election as directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may, in its discretion, review the qualifications and backgrounds of
existing directors and other nominees (without regard to whether a nominee has been recommended by stockholders), as well as the overall composition of our board, and recommend the slate of directors
to be nominated for election at the ensuing annual meeting of stockholders. Currently, we do not employ or pay
12
Table of Contents
a
fee to any third party to identify or evaluate, or assist in identifying or evaluating, potential director nominees.
The
charter of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee provides that the committee will evaluate our corporate governance effectiveness and recommend such revisions as it deems
appropriate to improve our corporate governance. The areas of evaluation may include such matters as the size and independence requirements of our board, board committees, management succession and
planning, and regular meetings of our non-employee directors without management in executive sessions.
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee did not receive any stockholder recommendations for nomination to our board in connection with this year's annual meeting. The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has recommended Ms. McArdle and Messrs. Schall and Walton, who are current Class C directors, for re-election as the term of their
class is expiring on our classified board.
Board Diversity.
Our board does not have a formal written policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director
nominees. Our
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter, however, requires the committee to review the composition of the board as a whole and
recommend, if necessary, measures to be taken so that our board not only contains the required number of independent directors, but also reflects the balance of knowledge, experience, skills,
expertise, integrity, analytical ability and diversity as a whole that the committee deems appropriate. This review includes an assessment as to our board's current and anticipated need for directors
with specific qualities, skills, experience or backgrounds; the availability of highly qualified candidates; committee workloads and membership needs; and anticipated director retirements. In making
its recommendations, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will also consider diversity on gender, racial, ethnic and any other self-identified diversity characteristics of directors and
candidates to become directors, all with a view towards enhancing the effectiveness of our board of directors. However, we do not inquire or require that directors or nominees self-identify as diverse
in any particular respect, and none of our directors or nominees have elected to do so.
Leadership Structure.
In connection with the resignation of Floyd C. Wilson from our Company on February 21, 2019, our board
appointed James
W. Christmas Chairman of the Board. The Board intends to make the separation of the position of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer permanent to strengthen the Company's governance
structure. Previously, the roles were combined and Mr. Christmas served as lead independent director ("Lead Director"). Our board believes that no single leadership model is right for all
companies at all times, and that a combined Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles may be appropriate and efficient under certain circumstances, by fostering accountability, effective
decision-making and alignment on corporate strategy while reducing the potential for fractured leadership that can undermine successful implementation of policy; however, under present circumstances
and with new leadership in several key roles of the Company, our board believes that the interests of the Company and its stockholders are best served by separating the two roles. In recognition that
Mr. Christmas will be required to spend substantially greater time on Company matters, particularly on an interim basis while the Company searches for a new chief executive,
Mr. Christmas's compensation as a director has been adjusted as discussed under the heading "
2019 Director Compensation
".
The
Chairman of our board of directors is elected annually by our board. The Chairman's responsibilities and authority generally include:
-
-
presiding over all meetings of the board and, to the extent the Chairman is also an independent director, presiding over executive sessions of
the independent directors of the board;
-
-
calling special meetings of the board when necessary and appropriate;
-
-
coordinating the agenda for, and moderating meetings of, the board;
13
Table of Contents
-
-
facilitating communication between the board and members of senior management of the Company;
-
-
establishing the schedule of regular and special meetings of the board to ensure that there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda
items;
-
-
facilitating communications among the other members of the board;
-
-
consulting with the chairs of the board committees and soliciting their participation to avoid diluting their authority or responsibilities;
and
-
-
performing other duties as the board may from time to time delegate.
Our
corporate governance guidelines currently provide that non-management directors must meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management. During 2018,
Mr. Christmas, as Lead Director, presided over the executive sessions of our non-management directors during 2018. During
2018, our non-management directors held four (4) executive sessions without management present, and Mr. Christmas presided over each executive session.
Risk Oversight.
It is the job of our executive officers and other members of our senior management to identify, assess, and manage our
exposure to
risk. In conjunction with our risk oversight program, senior management has retained outside consultants to assist in identifying, assessing, analyzing and developing plans to mitigate enterprise
risks. Our board plays an important role in overseeing management's performance of these functions. Our board has approved the audit committee charter, which lists the primary responsibilities of the
Audit Committee. Those responsibilities require the Audit Committee to discuss with management our major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such
exposures, including the substance of any significant litigation, contingencies or claims that had, or may have, a significant impact on the financial statements. The Audit Committee is also required
to discuss with management and review the mechanisms, guidelines and policies that govern the processes by which risk assessment and management are undertaken.
Each
of the board's other committees also oversees the management of risks that fall within such committee's area of responsibility. Our Compensation Committee incorporates risk
considerations, including the risk of loss of key personnel, as it evaluates the performance of our executive officers, reviews management development and determines compensation structure and
amounts. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee focuses on issues and risks relating to board composition, leadership structures, succession planning and corporate governance matters. The
focus of our Reserves Committee is on the integrity of the process of selecting our independent petroleum engineers and whether reports prepared by our independent petroleum engineers are prepared in
accordance with the accepted or required petroleum engineering standards.
Our
board receives reports from its committees regarding the risks considered in their respective areas to ensure that our board has a broad view of our strategy and overall risk
management process. In performing its risk oversight function, each committee has full access to management, as well as the ability to engage advisors. Each committee's charter is available on our
website at
www.halconresources.com
.
Communications with Directors.
Our board welcomes communications from our stockholders and other interested parties. Stockholders and
any other
interested parties may send communications to our board, to any committee of our board, to the Chairman of the board, or to any director in particular to: c/o Halcón Resources
Corporation, Attention: Corporate Secretary, 1000 Louisiana St., Suite 1500, Houston, Texas 77002. Any correspondence addressed to our board, to any committee of our board, to the Chairman of
the board, or to any one of the directors in care of our offices is required to be forwarded to the addressee or addressees without review by any person to whom such correspondence is not addressed.
14
Table of Contents
Directors' Attendance at Stockholder Meetings.
Our corporate governance guidelines provide that our directors are encouraged, but not
required, to
attend annual meetings of our stockholders. None of our non-employee directors attended the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Charter of Aircraft.
In the ordinary course of its business, Halcón occasionally charters a private aircraft for business use.
Floyd
C. Wilson, Halcón's former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, indirectly owns an aircraft which the Company chartered from time to time. During 2018, fees for the use of
Mr. Wilson's aircraft by the Company were based upon comparable costs that the Company would have incurred in chartering the same type and size of aircraft from an independent third party
utilizing data from several independent third party aircraft leasing companies. The terms for this use were evaluated and approved by the Audit Committee, and subsequently by the disinterested members
of our board upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, in accordance with the Company's procedures for the review and approval of transactions with related parties. During the year ended
December 31, 2018, Halcón paid approximately $0.9 million for the use of the aircraft indirectly owned by Mr. Wilson and had recorded a $0.2 million payable
at year end. In 2019, the Company has terminated all charter arrangements with Mr. Wilson relating to the use of his aircraft.
Gas Purchase and Processing Agreement.
On November 16, 2017, a subsidiary of Halcón entered into a gas purchase and
processing
agreement with Salt Creek Midstream, LLC ("Salt Creek") pursuant to which Halcón agreed to dedicate, for a term of 15 years, all production from its acreage in Ward
County, Texas (that is not otherwise previously dedicated) and certain sections in Winkler County, Texas to natural gas gathering pipeline and processing facilities to be constructed by Salt Creek.
The facilities were completed and placed in service in April 2018. The agreement with Salt Creek was the culmination of a lengthy process during which Halcón investigated the most
efficient method of gathering, processing and marketing its future natural gas production in these areas. During the course of its investigation, Halcón considered the construction of
Company owned gas gathering and processing facilities, Company owned high pressure pipeline to a third-party processing plant and solicited and
received proposals from numerous third parties for long-term gathering and processing options. Halcón received proposals from eight midstream companies, determined that third party
options were more attractive from a variety of business perspectives, and that among the proposals it received, Salt Creek's was superior. For the year ended December 31, 2018,
Halcón received approximately $0.4 million from Salt Creek pursuant to the gas purchase and processing agreement.
Certain
funds under the control of Ares Management LLC ("Ares") are the majority owners and controlling parties of Salt Creek. Ares also controls other funds which own in excess
of ten percent (10%) of the stock of the Company. No Ares fund that is a stockholder of the Company has an interest in Salt Creek but one of the Company's directors, who is employed by Ares, and is a
director of the Company, also serves on the board of directors of Salt Creek. Due to these relationships, prior to entering into the gas purchase and processing agreement, the process by which the
Company determined the Salt Creek proposal to be superior to other alternatives, as well as the terms of the agreement, were evaluated and approved in advance by the Audit Committee and the
disinterested members of Halcón's board, in a vote that excluded the director who is employed by Ares in accordance with applicable Company policies, including its Code of Conduct and
Corporate Governance Guidelines (copies of which are available through the Company's website at
www.halconresources.com
), and the Company's procedures
for the review and approval of transactions with related parties.
15
Table of Contents
Pipeline Testing Services.
In February 2019, the Company entered into an agreement with Cima Inspection LLC ("Cima"), a company
specializing
in advanced, non-destructive methods of testing pipes and tubing, pursuant to which Cima will inspect various Company gathering and transportation assets. One of our directors owns a minority interest
in Cima and currently serves, without compensation, as its chief executive officer. The engagement of Cima was the result of a lengthy process during which Halcón investigated the most
cost-effective method of conducting testing on its gathering and transportation assets. Halcón considered the performance and cost of various alternatives and solicited proposals from
third parties before determining that Cima's proposal offered the most timely cost efficient solution to the Company's needs. The Company expects to pay Cima not more than approximately
$0.58 million during 2019 for testing services, including up to approximately $0.11 million for supplies and materials the costs of which are passed-through to the Company by Cima. As a
result of the relationship of one of our directors with Cima, the process by which the Company determined the Cima's proposal to be superior to others, as well as the terms of the agreement, were
evaluated and
approved by the Audit Committee and the disinterested members of Halcón's board, in a vote that excluded that director in accordance with applicable Company policies, including its Code
of Conduct and Corporate Governance Guidelines (copies of which are available through the Company's website at
www.halconresources.com
), and the
Company's procedures for the review and approval of transactions with related parties.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION REVIEW POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
A transaction or series of similar transactions to which we are a party in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and involves a director,
executive officer, 5% stockholder or any immediate family members of these persons is evaluated by a special committee of disinterested directors formed by our board to evaluate such transactions. In
addition, our Code of Conduct provides that every employee should disclose any material transaction or relationship that could reasonably be expected to give rise to a conflict of interest to upper
management or the Audit Committee. The Company's Code of Conduct can be found on Halcón's website located at
www.halconresources.com
. The
Audit Committee has the authority to evaluate any such conflicts of interest and recommend actions to be taken by our board in connection with such conflicts of interest or to report the existence of
any such conflicts of interest to the full board for it to take action.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our voting
securities to file certain reports with the SEC concerning their beneficial ownership of our equity securities. The SEC's regulations also require that a copy of all such Section 16(a) forms
filed must be furnished to us by the executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders. To our knowledge based solely on a review of copies of reports filed under Section 16(a)
during the 2018 fiscal year and furnished to us, our directors, executive officers and holders of 10% or more of our shares timely filed reports required by Section 16(a).
CODE OF CONDUCT AND CODE OF ETHICS
The Company's Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers can be found on
Halcón's website located at
www.halconresources.com
. Any stockholder may request a printed copy of such materials by submitting a written
request to Quentin R. Hicks, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Halcón Resources Corporation, 1801 California Street, Suite 3500, Denver, Colorado 80202. If
Halcón amends
the Code of Ethics or grants a waiver, including an implicit waiver, from the Code of Ethics, Halcón will disclose the information on its website. The waiver information will remain on
the website for at least twelve months after the initial disclosure of such waiver.
16
Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth the names and ages of all of our executive officers, the positions and offices with us currently held by such
persons and the months and years in which continuous service began:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Executive
Officer
Since
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
David S. Elkouri
|
|
|
May 2012
|
|
|
65
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|
Jon C. Wright
|
|
|
May 2012
|
|
|
49
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Quentin R. Hicks
|
|
|
Aug. 2013
|
|
|
44
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|
Leah R. Kasparek
|
|
|
May 2012
|
|
|
49
|
|
Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Administration
|
Our
executive officers are appointed to serve until the meeting of the board following the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified.
The following paragraphs contain certain information about each of our executive officers. Management of the day to day affairs of our Company has been entrusted on an interim basis to a committee
composed of our executive officers following the resignation of our former chief executive officer in February 2019. While our executive officers on the management committee work collaboratively as a
team, David S. Elkouri is the chairman of that committee, and in such capacity is serving on an interim basis as our principal executive officer.
David S. Elkouri
has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer since April 2014 and as Chief Ethics Officer and Insider
Trading Compliance Officer since August 2012. Mr. Elkouri served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel from May 2012 to April 2014. Mr. Elkouri served as Executive Vice
PresidentGeneral Counsel and Secretary of Petrohawk Energy Corporation from 2007 until BHP Billiton acquired Petrohawk in August 2011. He also served as Chief Ethics Officer and Insider
Trading Compliance Officer of Petrohawk. From 2004 to 2007, he served as lead outside counsel for Petrohawk. Prior to that, Mr. Elkouri served as lead outside counsel for 3TEC Energy
Corporation from 1999 to 2003. He also served as lead outside counsel for Hugoton Energy Corporation from 1994 to 1998. Mr. Elkouri is a co-founder of Hinkle Law Firm LLC where he
practiced for 20 years prior to joining Petrohawk. Mr. Elkouri is a graduate of the University of Kansas School of Law where he served as a Research Editor of the Kansas Law Review.
Jon C. Wright
has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since August 2017. Mr. Wright served as Executive
Vice President, Operations from September 2016 to August 2017. Mr. Wright served as Senior Vice President, Operations from December 2014 to September 2016 and as Vice President, Operations from
May 2012 to December 2014. Mr. Wright served as W. Rockies Operations Manager at Newfield Exploration from 2009 until 2012. Mr. Wright also served as Lead, Production for W. Oklahoma and
Lead Drilling for Woodford Shale from 2005 until 2009. Prior to that, Mr. Wright was a Senior Drilling Engineer at BP from 2004 to 2005. He also served as Drilling Engineer from 2001 to 2004.
From 1997 to 2001, he held various drilling positions for Conoco. Mr. Wright has a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering from Texas A&M University and a Master of Business
Administration degree from Rice University.
Quentin R. Hicks
has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since March 2019, having previously served as
Executive Vice President, Finance, Capital Markets and Investor Relations since January 2018. Mr. Hicks initially joined Halcón as Director of Financial Planning in August 2012
after GeoResources merged with Halcón. He was promoted to Vice President, Finance in August 2013. In January 2016, he was promoted to Senior Vice President, Finance and Investor
Relations. While with GeoResources, Mr. Hicks served as Director of Acquisitions and Financial Planning from 2011 to 2012.
17
Table of Contents
From
2004 to 2011, he worked in investment banking with Bear Stearns, Sanders Morris Harris and most recently Madison Williams, where he was a Director in their energy investment banking practice.
Prior to that, Mr. Hicks worked as Manager of Financial Reporting for Continental Airlines. He began his career in 1998 working as an auditor for Ernst and Young LLP. Mr. Hicks
graduated from Texas A&M University with a Bachelor of Business Administration and a Master of Science degree in accounting. In addition, he holds a Masters of Business Administration degree in
finance from Vanderbilt University. Mr. Hicks is a Certified Public Accountant.
Leah R. Kasparek
has served as Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Administration since December 2014. Ms. Kasparek served
as Vice President, Human Resources from May 2012 to December 2014. Ms. Kasparek initially joined Halcón as Director of Human Resources in February 2012. Prior to joining
Halcón, Ms. Kasparek held numerous Human Resources leadership positions across multiple industries including oil and gas, utilities and manufacturing. Ms. Kasparek served
as Director of Human Resources at Southwestern Energy from 2009 to January 2012. She served as Vice President of Human Resources for CenterPoint Energy from 2004 until 2008. From 1996 to 2004,
Ms. Kasparek was employed by Anheuser-Busch Companies and served as Vice President of Human Resources from 2001 until 2004. Ms. Kasparek has a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University
of Louisiana at Lafayette and a law degree from the University of Houston Law Center.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following discussion of executive compensation contains descriptions of various employment-related agreements and employee benefit plans.
These descriptions are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of the referenced agreements and plans, which have been filed by us as exhibits to our reports on Forms 10-K,
10-Q and 8-K filed with the SEC.
The Compensation Committee of our board is composed entirely of independent directors. Throughout 2018 the members of the Compensation Committee
were: William J. Campbell (Chairman), James W. Christmas and Michael L. Clark. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducts an annual review of the composition of each of the committees
of our board, including the Compensation Committee, and makes recommendations to our board to the extent it determines that any changes in the membership of such committees is advisable.
Our
compensation philosophies and programs are designed, structured and administered under the oversight of the Compensation Committee. Among the important responsibilities delegated to
the
Compensation Committee by our board is evaluating the performance of, and making recommendations on the compensation of the senior management of the Company, including the performance and compensation
of the executive officers who we refer to as our "named executive officers". For the purposes of our discussion, our named executive officers for 2018 were:
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
Floyd C. Wilson*
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President (our principal executive officer)
|
Mark J. Mize*
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (our principal financial officer)
|
Stephen W. Herod*
|
|
Executive Vice President, Corporate Development
|
David S. Elkouri
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer
|
Jon C. Wright
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
|
-
*
-
Messrs. Wilson,
Mize and Herod resigned from all positions with the Company during the first quarter of 2019, which was treated as a termination by the Company
without "Cause" under their respective employment agreements. As a consequence, each was entitled to certain severance benefits described in greater detail under the heading
"
Termination Provisions and Severance Payments
".
We operate in a highly competitive environment and must recruit, motivate and retain the executive talent required to successfully manage and
grow our business and to achieve our short and long-term business objectives. We use a competitive mix of fixed and at-risk compensation to achieve our goals and to align the interests of senior
management and key employees to those of our stockholders. As a general matter, during 2018 total compensation for our senior management was targeted at the 50
th
percentile of our
compensation peer group utilizing data and analyses provided by our independent compensation consultant and taking into account our assessment of management's performance, competitive market
conditions and other factors that we deem relevant. We may vary from our targets where we believe doing so is necessary based upon our assessment of the risks of losing talented management or
desirable in order to provide rewards we consider appropriate to measure managements' performance against our goals, and to incentivize management to implement our business objectives.
21
Table of Contents
We
believe that our compensation program must be flexible due to the dynamic nature of our Company and our industry. We have needed this flexibility to appropriately manage our
compensation throughout the life of our Company. Prior to the industry downturn that began in late 2014, we experienced a period of rapid growth in acreage, reserves and production and competition for
talented management was intense. Then, during the midst of the downturn in 2016, due to dramatically altered industry conditions and prolonged declines in oil and natural gas prices, we downsized and
reorganized, as did many in our industry. During 2017, we experienced dramatic changes to our business model as we divested substantially all of our proved reserves and production in our legacy
properties and acquired our current largely undeveloped acreage position in the Delaware Basin.
Each
of these situations necessitated significant changes to our compensation approach and programs. For instance, during times of rapid growth, we historically targeted compensation in
the upper quartile of our compensation peer group which we considered appropriate to recruit, motivate and retain the executive talent capable of executing a rapid growth business strategy and
managing our business in a
competitive environment, and because our stated willingness to embrace consolidation trends in our industry may increase the uncertainty of future employment with us as compared to some of our
competitors. Recently, as discussed in greater detail below, we have targeted compensation at the 50
th
percentile of our compensation peer group, based, in part, on our assessment
of the competitive environment for management talent. During 2016, as the Company considered possible scenarios to improve its balance sheet and capital structure, the retention of our management team
was critically important to our potential long-term success and viability and, as a result, certain compensation arrangements were not necessarily tied to a target of our compensation peer group but
instead based upon what was advisable under the circumstances. In summary, our compensation programs are, and we believe they must remain, adaptable and focused on enabling us to recruit, motivate and
retain the executive talent required to successfully manage and grow our business and to achieve our short and long-term business objectives.
We
believe that "at-risk" compensation helps to align the interests of management with our stockholders and incentivizes management to achieve our short and long-term business
objectives. At-risk compensation includes annual cash incentives with payout dependent upon our Compensation Committee's annual assessment of management performance, and long-term equity incentives.
Long-term equity incentives will typically comprise more than 50% of the value of the total compensation paid to our senior management. For 2018, we targeted approximately 250% of base salary, by
value, to long-term equity incentives for the named executive officers, with the exception of Mr. Wilson, whose target was 300% of base salary. We targeted this level of long-term equity
incentives based upon the practices of our compensation peer group targeting the 50
th
percentile, the recommendations of our compensation consultant and our own view that a
substantial porion of compensation should take the form of long-term incentives that incentivize management to enhance share price while taking into consideration our objective of attracting and
retaining management in a competitive environment. During 2018, long-term incentives were comprised of time-vested restricted stock and stock option awards issued under the Halcón
Resources Corporation 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended, which we refer to as the "Plan". Stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the closing market price of our common stock
on the date of grant. Accordingly, stock options become valuable only if our common stock price increases above the market price on the date of grant following vesting and remains above that price at
the time of exercise. Additionally, each equity award that we issue generally vests over a minimum period of three years. Awards subject to time vesting are subject to the risk of fluctuations in the
trading price of our common stock and the risk of forfeiture if the individual does not remain employed by us through the vesting of the award. During 2018, based on the recommendations of our
compensation consultant, to enhance retention in a volatile market environment and to mitigate the use of shares under the Plan, we utilized approximately two-thirds by value of restricted stock
awards and one third by value of stock option awards.
22
Table of Contents
The
relative mix of the direct elements of our 2018 executive compensation program is shown in the charts below (at target) for both our CEO and the other NEOs (in aggregate). Long-term
incentive compensation, of which approximately one-half is in the form of stock option awards, represents a substantially larger proportion of total direct compensation than any other element. The
charts below
illustrate that the design of our executive compensation program is aligned with the interests of our shareholders. 80% of the CEO pay is at risk and 78% of NEO pay is at risk.
We
maintain stock ownership guidelines which help align the financial interest of our directors, chief executive officer and president and executive vice presidents with stockholders by
requiring that such individuals directly or indirectly maintain a substantial investment in our common stock. Subject to certain exceptions contained in the stock ownership guidelines policy, all of
the Company's directors and executive officers, including the named executive officers, are in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines. We believe that the structure of our compensation program
helps us achieve our goals and aligns the interests of senior management with those of our stockholders by combining competitive compensation with the opportunity for greater rewards for short-term
performance relative to our business objectives and long-term performance of our common stock.
The Compensation Committee of the board is comprised entirely of independent directors in accordance with the rules of the NYSE. The primary
duties and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are to establish and implement our compensation policies and programs for senior management, including the named executive officers. The
Compensation Committee has the authority under its charter to select and engage the services of a compensation consultant, independent legal counsel or other advisor after considering certain factors
relevant to independence from management. After conducting its independence assessment, the Compensation Committee has the sole authority to engage, obtain the advice of, oversee, terminate and
determine funding for such independence professional advisers, including but not limited to consulting firms, independent legal counsel or other advisers, as the Compensation Committee determines
appropriate to carry out its functions. A current copy of the Compensation Committee charter is available on our website at
www.halconresources.com
under the section entitled "
InvestorsCorporate Governance
." The Compensation Committee also reviews and assesses the adequacy of its
charter, at least annually, and recommends any proposed changes to our board for approval.
The
Chairman of the Compensation Committee works with our Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Administration to establish an agenda for each meeting of the Compensation Committee
and, with the assistance of outside advisors, to prepare meeting materials. Various members of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President, Human Resources and
Administration, as well as outside advisors, may be invited to attend all or a portion of a Compensation Committee meeting depending on the nature of the matters to be discussed. Only members of the
23
Table of Contents
Compensation
Committee vote on items before the Compensation Committee; however, the Compensation Committee and the board often solicit the views of senior management on compensation matters, in
particular as they relate to the compensation of other members of senior management.
Our success depends on the continued contributions of our senior management and other key employees. Our compensation program is intended to
recruit, motivate and retain the executive talent required to successfully manage and grow our business and to achieve our short and long-term business strategy by providing compensation that is
competitive in relation to our peers while fostering an atmosphere of teamwork, recognizing overall business results and individual merit, and that supports the attainment of our strategic objectives
by tying the interests of senior management and key employees to those of our stockholders through the use of annual cash incentives and equity-based compensation.
Our compensation program for senior management, including the named executive officers, is designed
to:
-
-
provide compensation that is competitive with our compensation peer group;
-
-
balance short-term and long-term goals through the use of annual cash incentives and grants of long-term equity incentives; and
-
-
deliver a mix of fixed and at-risk compensation the value of which relates to our overall performance and the creation of stockholder value.
Each
element of compensation is considered together with the other elements of compensation to ensure that both that particular element of compensation and our overall compensation
program are consistent with our goals and objectives and that our compensation practices do not encourage management to engage in inappropriate, unnecessary or excessive risk taking. We considered the
following factors in determining senior management compensation for 2018, all of which were considered together, without any weighting:
-
-
the compensation practices of our compensation peer group and analysis of market practices, as prepared for us by our independent compensation
consultant;
-
-
the compensation recommendations of our independent compensation consultant;
-
-
the degree and extent to which senior management achieved our business objectives;
-
-
input from the Company's Chief Executive Officer and from the Company's Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Administration on the
accomplishments of senior management;
-
-
input from members of senior management on their individual contributions; and
-
-
the challenges to our ability to attract, retain and appropriately motivate strong senior management.
The Compensation Committee has historically retained Longnecker & Associates, Inc. ("Longnecker") to advise on executive
compensation and, in that capacity to, among other things, make recommendations regarding an appropriate compensation peer group, to assist the Compensation Committee in establishing a competitive
executive compensation program and to make recommendations and provide analysis regarding the compensation of senior management, including the named executive officers. In accordance with the NYSE
rules, the Compensation Committee annually considers the independence of Longnecker from Company management based upon various factors, including the
24
Table of Contents
magnitude
of any fees received from the Company relative to Longnecker's annual gross revenues; whether the individuals that advise the Compensation Committee participate directly or by collaboration
with others within Longnecker in the provision of any services or products to the Company; whether Longnecker provided any products or services to any executive officer of the Company; and whether the
individuals that advise the Compensation Committee own any Company securities. In conducting its evaluation, the Compensation Committee obtains from, and relies upon, responses from Longnecker
relating to the foregoing. After considering these various factors and Longnecker's responses, the Compensation Committee determined that Longnecker was independent of
Company management during the relevant periods covered by this report. No conflicts of interest or issues involving the independence of Longnecker arose during the periods covered by this report.
Longnecker
is engaged by, and reports directly to, the Compensation Committee in carrying out its duties, and works with our Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Administration
when preparing materials for the Compensation Committee. During 2018, representatives of Longnecker attended Compensation Committee meetings, met with the Compensation Committee without management
being present and provided third-party data, analysis, advice and expertise on executive compensation matters and competitive executive compensation programs. We considered and relied upon this data,
Longneckers' analyses of the data and its recommendations in establishing our compensation peer group and compensation programs, including the mix and amount of compensation utilized for our senior
management, including the named executive officers. Longnecker also advised the Compensation Committee regarding the form of the employment agreement for senior management originally formulated in
2012, and which we continue to use today.
In
assisting the Compensation Committee, Longnecker generates reports that include a compilation of compensation data based upon our compensation peer group (discussed below) and
particularized data for industry participants to the extent Longnecker determines that such additional data would prove useful. At the direction of the Compensation Committee, Longnecker will also
review any materials relating to compensation that are prepared by senior management and advise the Compensation Committee as to the consistency of management proposals with the committee's
compensation philosophy, programs and objectives.
Our
Compensation Committee annually reconsiders, with the advice and assistance of Longnecker, the composition of our compensation peer group and will recommend changes to the peer group
so that it reflects, in the estimation of Longnecker and our Compensation Committee, a mix of companies that share pertinent characteristics with our Company and that are potential competitors with us
for management talent. Changes to the composition of our compensation peer group may occur in response to, among other things, changes in our business, including assets, production levels, revenues,
oil and natural gas reserves and production mix, market capitalization and enterprise value, and as a consequence of business combinations involving members of our peer group. Longnecker advises us on
the composition of our compensation peer group and provides reports and analyses on their compensation and benefits practices.
In developing our compensation structure, we review the compensation and benefit practices, as well as levels of pay, of a compensation peer
group of oil and natural gas exploration and development companies selected by the Compensation Committee. In preparation for our 2018 compensation review, Longnecker provided compensation data and
analyses, which included, among other things, (1) the companies reviewed in their analysis of an appropriate compensation peer
group recommendation; (2) compensation data of the recommended compensation peer group; and (3) particularized data for industry participants to the extent Longnecker determined that
such additional data would prove useful in our compensation process.
25
Table of Contents
We
periodically review, evaluate and update our compensation peer group to provide ongoing comparability for compensation purposes. Adjustments to our compensation peer group are made
due to business combinations or sales of peer group companies, as well as when necessary, in the opinion of our Compensation Committee, to better reflect the companies that compete with us for
management talent and share common characteristics with our business, such as assets, production levels, revenues, oil and natural gas reserves and production mix, market capitalization and enterprise
value. For the compensation structure developed for 2018, our compensation peer group consisted of the following companies:
|
|
|
Approach Resources,
Inc.
|
|
PDC Energy,
Inc.
|
Callon Petroleum
Company
|
|
QEP Resources,
Inc.
|
Carrizo Oil & Gas,
Inc.
|
|
Resolute Energy
Corporation
|
Energen
Corporation
|
|
RSP Permian,
Inc.
|
EP Energy
Corporation
|
|
Sandridge Energy,
Inc.
|
Laredo Petroleum,
Inc.
|
|
SM Energy
Company
|
Matador Resources
Company
|
|
|
In
conjunction with our consideration of 2019 compensation, including annual cash incentives for 2018 performance, we asked Longnecker to revisit our compensation peer group and provide
advice regarding any recommended changes. As a result, Longnecker recommended changes to our peer group to reflect our current assets, revenues, oil and natural gas reserves and production mix, market
capitalization and enterprise value, as well as to eliminate companies that had been acquired, merged into another company or had announced an intention to do so. Based upon the recommendations of
Longnecker, our Compensation Committee approved the following companies to serve as our compensation peer group for 2019:
|
|
|
Approach Resources,
Inc.
|
|
PDC Energy,
Inc.
|
Callon Petroleum
Company
|
|
QEP Resources,
Inc.
|
Carrizo Oil & Gas,
Inc.
|
|
Resolute Energy
Corporation
|
Earthstone Energy,
Inc.
|
|
Rosehill
Resources Inc.
|
EP Energy
Corporation
|
|
Sandridge Energy,
Inc.
|
Highpoint Resources
Corporation
|
|
|
Jagged Peak
Energy Inc.
|
|
|
Laredo Petroleum,
Inc.
|
|
|
The principal elements of our executive compensation program are base salary, annual cash incentives, long-term equity incentives and
post-termination severance (under certain circumstances), and other benefits and perquisites, consisting of life and health insurance benefits, a qualified 401(k) savings plan and limited tax gross
ups for life insurance. Previously, we reimbursed certain club dues for our former Chief Executive Officer and our former Chief Financial Officer and provided limited tax gross ups for these
memberships and parking. The Compensation Committee does not plan to provide these perquisites in the future. From time to time, the Compensation Committee may vary the mix of compensation utilized,
depending upon the Compensation Committee's current view of the most effective method to provide incentives under current market conditions, taking into account the compensation practices of our
compensation peer group and the advice of our independent compensation consultant.
As
noted earlier, we generally target total compensation for our senior management at approximately the 50
th
percentile of our compensation peer group; however, our
approach is flexible and is based upon our assessment of many factors. For instance, we have targeted compensation in the upper quartile of our compensation peer group at times of rapid growth, as we
considered it necessary for us to recruit, motivate and retain the executive talent capable of executing a rapid growth business strategy and managing our
26
Table of Contents
business
in a competitive environment, in part because we compete for executive talent with a much broader industry group than our compensation peer group, including larger, more established industry
participants, and because our stated willingness to embrace consolidation trends in our industry may increase the uncertainty of future employment with us as compared to some of our competitors.
However, as conditions have changed, our compensation targets have also changed. In making these determinations we take into account, among other factors, corporate performance, projected growth in
the Company, an executive's experience and value to the Company, individual performance and the current competitive environment for talented management. Thus, from time to time, we vary targeted
compensation and the balance of each element of compensation relative to our compensation peer group depending on our assessment of these factors and our view of the most effective means of achieving
our business objectives under the circumstances. While during periods of rapid growth we have targeted compensation as high as the 75
th
percentile of our compensation peer group,
in recent years, in response to our assessment of the factors enumerated above, we have targeted compensation at approximately the 50
th
percentile of our compensation peer group.
We maintained this 50
th
percentile target for 2018 for total compensation, base salaries and long-term equity awards, and we continued to use a mix of restricted stock and stock
options; however, in the past we would typically target a relatively equal mix by value of restricted stock and stock option awards for senior management, whereas for 2018, we used a larger percentage
of restricted stock awards by value (2/3rds), based on
the recommendations of our compensation consultant and with a view toward enhancing our ability to retain talent in a volatile market environment as well as conserve the use of shares under the Plan.
We varied from our total compensation targets of our compensation peer group in that we did not pay any annual cash incentives to Messrs. Wilson, Herod or Mize for 2018 performance, in large
part due to the failure of senior management to meet the performance metrics established by our Compensation Committee, discussed in greater detail below, and also because it was apparent that each
would be departing the Company and was entitled to receive significant payments under their respective employment agreements. We did award bonuses of approximately 25% of base salary to
Messrs. Elkouri and Wright, based on their individual contributions during the year and their importance to our Company as we transitioned additional leadership responsibilities to them in the
wake of the departures of Messrs. Wilson, Herod and Mize.
We review base salaries for our executive officers annually to determine if a change is appropriate. In reviewing base salaries, we consider
several factors, including a comparison to base salaries paid for comparable positions in our compensation peer group, the relationship among base salaries paid within our Company and individual
experience and contributions. Our intent is to fix base salaries at levels that we believe are consistent with our compensation program design objectives, which include a greater emphasis upon the
incentive elements of compensation without sacrificing our ability to recruit, motivate and retain executive talent in a competitive environment.
For
2018, we maintained base salaries of the named executive officers at the same levels as in 2017, as such amounts remain competitive utilizing our 2018 compensation peer group
targeting the 50
th
percentile of that group for comparable positions, with the exception of an increase in Mr. Wright's base salary of $25,000 per annum to align his base
salary with such target. Base salaries for all of our named executive officers in 2018 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
2018 Base Salary
|
|
Floyd C. Wilson
|
|
$
|
800,000
|
|
Stephen W. Herod
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
Mark J. Mize
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
David S. Elkouri
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
Jon C. Wright
|
|
$
|
425,000
|
|
27
Table of Contents
Annual cash incentives for 2018 performance were determined following the end of the year on the basis of management performance during 2018. At
the beginning of the year, the Compensation Committee established certain operating and financial performance metrics, assigned them relative weightings and established annual targets for payout for
each of them. The targeted payouts for each of the named executive officers ranged from 50% of base salary for achieving the minimum annual targets, 100% for achieving more aggressive annual targets
and 200% for achieving the most aggressive, or "stretch," annual targets. The targets at the 100% payout level were intended to be achievable but challenging to reach. As a general matter, the
Compensation Committee assigns a relative weight of approximately 50% to corporate performance and 50% to individual performance in considering annual cash incentives; however, ultimately, any such
award is entirely discretionary, as our Compensation Committee believes retaining discretion over the amount of such awards is imperative in light of the dynamic nature of the Company's activities,
the potential for rapid changes in the business environment and the limitations inherent in quantitative measures of performance under such circumstances. Further, our Compensation Committee views the
successful implementation of our goals as a "team" effort and has therefore not established individualized performance targets or goals, although our Compensation Committee does recognize that each
member of senior management will contribute to the overall success in the achievement of our goals to varying degrees, and it takes these
relative contributions into account when considering compensation generally, and annual cash incentives in particular.
The
operating and financial performance metrics established for 2018 performance were:
-
-
net debt to last quarter annualized adjusted EBITDA;
-
-
adjusted cash flow per share (fully diluted);
-
-
drilling and completion capital expenditures relative to growth in proved developed producing reserves per Boe;
-
-
lease operating expense and workover costs per Boe;
-
-
cash general and administrative costs per Boe; and
-
-
a health and environmental safety metric based on the total recordable incident rate of Company employees and contractors, as well as barrels
spilled per million barrels of oil and water produced.
In
the future, for a variety of reasons, such as to assist in communicating corporate objectives and setting definitive expectations and rewards for senior management, we may elect to
establish bonus targets and performance targets that must be met in whole or in part to qualify for annual cash incentives and in conjunction therewith we may limit the discretion of our Compensation
Committee or board of directors in determining annual cash incentives. However, as a general matter we do not believe that a formulaic or inflexible compensation program will necessarily provide
appropriate incentives or rewards for the performance that we expect and, therefore, we intend to retain discretion to alter performance factors and targets as circumstances warrant and, in assessing
the performance of the Company or an individual, to take such factors into consideration as we may deem relevant from time to time. Accordingly, compensation, including annual cash compensation, may
vary greatly from year to year and from executive to executive as a consequence of corporate performance and individual contribution relative to such factors that we may consider important, which may
carry varying weight over time depending on the circumstances.
During
2018, performance on each of the metrics established by the Compensation Committee failed to meet the minimum threshold levels established by the Compensation Committee, with the
exception of the health and environmental safety target, with respect to which performance was better than the minimum targets for both total recordable incident rate and barrels spilled per million
barrels of oil and
28
Table of Contents
water
produced. The Compensation Committee did consider various other accomplishments of management during 2018, including:
-
-
the successful sale of the Company's water infrastructure assets;
-
-
success in acquiring acreage focused around the Company's existing Delaware basin position on attractive terms; and
-
-
significantly reducing headcount.
The
Compensation Committee also considered the performance of the Company's common stock, as reflected in its trading price and the various factors unrelated to specific management
accomplishments during the year affecting it. Taking these factors into account, the Compensation Committee determined that management performance during 2018 did not warrant the payment of annual
cash incentive awards to Messrs. Wilson, Herod and Mize. In addition, the Compensation Committee considered that each of Messrs. Wilson, Herod and Mize would be departing the Company and
entitled to receive significant payments under their respective employment agreements. The Compensation Committee did recommend an award of annual cash incentives equal to approximately 25% of base
salary to Messrs. Elkouri and Wright, based, in its view, on their individual contributions during the year and their importance to our Company as we transitioned additional leadership
responsibilities to them in the wake of recent management departures. Annual cash incentives for 2018 performance appear under the column heading
"
Bonus
" in the "
Summary Compensation Table
" below.
Long-term incentives comprise a significant portion of an executive's compensation package. Long-term incentives are consistent with our
objective of providing an "at-risk" component of compensation. Historically, we have awarded grants of restricted stock and stock options to senior management, including the named executive officers.
Each of these awards is discussed in more detail below. We have utilized this combination of awards because of their differing risk and reward characteristics. From time to time, we may utilize a
different mix of these awards or utilize other forms of awards, such performance shares or stock appreciation rights, each of which is permitted under the Plan, depending upon the Compensation
Committee's current view of the most efficacious method to provide incentives under current market conditions and taking into account the practices of our compensation peer group. Regardless of the
nature of the award, our Compensation Committee recommends, and the board approves, the type and amount of awards that will be made to all employees, as well as the type and size of individual grants
for each member of senior management.
All
grants of equity awards are made in accordance with our Equity-Based Incentive Grant Policy, which sets forth the timing of awards and the procedures for making awards and, in the
case of stock options and stock appreciation rights, for determining the exercise price or grant value, respectively, of the award. The amounts granted will vary each year and are based on our
analysis of compensation peer group data and the total compensation package of each member of senior management. Previous awards and grants, whether vested or unvested, may be considered by the
Compensation Committee in establishing the current year's awards, but was not a significant influence in our compensation practices for 2018.
As
noted above, for 2018 we targeted the 50
th
percentile of our compensation peer group for total compensation, including long-term equity awards, and we continued
to use a mix of restricted stock and stock options; however, we used a larger percentage of restricted stock awards by value (2/3rds) than our compensation peer group, based on the recommendations of
our compensation consultant and with
a view toward enhancing our ability to retain talent in a volatile market environment as well as conserve the use of shares under the Plan. At equivalent values, stock option awards utilize a greater
number of shares because they have an exercise price equal to the trading price on the date of grant, thereby requiring appreciation in stock price over the contractual term of the award to achieve
value. The shares of restricted stock and
29
Table of Contents
stock
options awarded in 2018 vest in three equal installments on each anniversary of the date of grant, beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant, provided that the recipient has been
continuously employed at such date. The exercise price of the stock options was equal to the closing price on the date of grant in accordance with the terms of our Equity-Based Incentive Grant Policy.
The long-term incentive information related to the named executive officers during fiscal year 2018 is included in the "
Summary Compensation Table
" set
forth below. Additional information on long-term incentive awards for 2018 is shown in the tables entitled "
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2018
" and
"
Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2018
". Information regarding long-term equity incentives granted to the named executive officers
subsequent to fiscal 2018 is set forth below under the heading "
Compensation Adjustments Subsequent to Fiscal Year End
."
We grant equity awards under the Plan which became effective on September 9, 2016 and originally provided for a total of 10,000,000
shares of common stock. On March 6, 2017, the holders of a majority of our outstanding voting stock approved an amendment to the Plan to increase by 9,000,000 the maximum number of shares of
common stock that we may issue under the Plan (subject to adjustment to prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of participants under the Plan) from 10,000,000 to 19,000,000, which became
effective on April 6, 2017. The Plan facilitates the issuance of future long-term incentive awards as part of our overall compensation program and is administered by our Compensation Committee.
As
of March 22, 2019, a total of 5,374,056 shares of common stock had been granted as restricted stock and were outstanding, 7,374,844 shares were reserved for the exercise of
outstanding stock options and 1,033,948 shares of our common stock remained available for issuance pursuant to the Plan. The Plan permits granting awards in a wide variety of forms, including options
to purchase our common stock, shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units (granting the recipient the right to receive common stock), shares of incentive stock (common stock issued without a
restriction period), stock appreciation rights, performance units (settled in common stock or cash) and performance bonuses (settled in common stock or cash). We currently utilize as awards under the
Plan only restricted stock and stock options, each of which is discussed in more detail below.
The
Plan will expire on September 9, 2026. No grants will be made under the Plan after that date, but all grants made on or prior to such date will continue in effect thereafter
subject to the terms of the award and of the Plan. Our board may, in its discretion, terminate the Plan at any time. The termination of the Plan would not affect the rights of participants or their
successors under any awards outstanding and not exercised in full on the date of termination. The board may at any time, amend the Plan in whole or in part. Any amendment that must be approved by our
stockholders to comply with the terms of the Plan, applicable law or the rules of the principal securities exchange, association or quotation system on which our common stock is then traded or quoted
will not be effective unless and until such approval has been obtained. The board is not permitted, without the further approval of the stockholders, to make any alteration or amendment that would
materially increase the benefits accruing to participants under the Plan, increase the aggregate number of shares that may be issued pursuant to the provisions of the Plan, change the class of
individuals eligible to receive awards under the Plan or extend the term of the Plan.
An important objective of our long-term incentive program is to strengthen the relationship between the long-term value of our stock price and
the potential financial gain for employees. Stock options provide participants with the opportunity to purchase our common stock at a price fixed on the grant date regardless of future market price. A
stock option becomes valuable only if our common stock price increases above the option exercise price and the holder of the option remains employed during the period required for the option to vest,
thus providing an incentive for an option holder to remain employed by us. Stock options link the option holder's compensation to stockholders' interests by providing an incentive to increase the
market price of our stock.
30
Table of Contents
Option grants to senior management are generally considered annually, at the same time as grants are considered for eligible employees, in February, after our
year-end results become available. Our practice is that the exercise price for each stock option is the market value on the date of grant, which is normally the date that our Compensation Committee
approves the award at a meeting of the Compensation Committee or a trading day after our release of earnings or other material nonpublic information in accordance with our Equity-Based Incentive Grant
Policy. Our current policy provides for grants to be made or priced only during a trading window, as set forth in our Amended and Restated Insider Trading Policy, and within such window only at such
time as there is no material non-public information regarding the Company. Under the Plan, the stock option price may not be less than the fair market value (the closing market price) of the shares on
the date of grant. With respect to employees who are not executive officers, the Compensation Committee typically delegates the authority to make such grants to our chief executive officer but
specifies the total number of shares that may be subject to grants and the other material terms of the grants. All proposed stock options to new-hire employees are required to be approved by our
Compensation Committee. Alternatively, our Compensation Committee may authorize in writing, in advance of any fiscal quarter, the number of
shares underlying stock options that may be granted to new-hire employees for the following fiscal quarter and provide that our chief executive officer may allocate such stock options at his
discretion.
Stock
options generally vest and become exercisable one-third annually after the original grant date. In certain instances, however, stock options may vest on an accelerated basis, such
as in the event an executive's employment is terminated by us without cause or by the executive with good reason, in the event that the executive terminates his employment within a certain period
following a transaction that effects a change in the control of our Company, or in the event of the executive's death or disability while employed by us. Under these circumstances all stock options
held by the executive may automatically vest and become exercisable in accordance with the terms outlined in his or her stock option award agreement or employment agreement, if applicable. The
employment agreements that we have entered into with the named executive officers provide for all stock options held by each executive to automatically vest and become exercisable in the event his
employment is terminated by us without cause, by the executive for good reason or with or without good reason within a two-year period following a change of control of our Company.
There
is a limited term in which an executive can exercise stock options, known as the "option term." The option term is generally ten years from the date of grant, which is the maximum
term of an option permitted under the Plan. At the end of the option term, the right to purchase shares pursuant to any unexercised option expires.
During
2018, each of the named executive officers received a mix of restricted stock and stock options under the Plan. Information on these grants, including the number of shares subject
to each grant and, in the case of stock options, the exercise price, is shown in the table below entitled "
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2018
."
Restricted stock awards are shares of our common stock that are awarded with the restriction that the executive remain with us through certain
"vesting" dates. Prior to the restrictions thereon lapsing, the participant may not sell, transfer, pledge, assign or take any similar action with respect to the shares of restricted stock which the
participant owns. Despite the restrictions, each participant will have full voting rights and will receive any dividends or other distributions, if any, with respect to the shares of restricted stock
which the participant owns. Once the restrictions lapse with respect to shares of restricted stock, the participant owning such shares will hold freely-transferable shares, subject only to any
restrictions on transfer contained in our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and insider trading policies, as well as any applicable federal or state securities laws.
31
Table of Contents
Restricted
stock awards to senior management are generally considered annually, at the same time as grants are considered for eligible employees, in February, after our year-end results
become available. Restricted stock awards provide the opportunity for capital accumulation and more predictable long-term incentive value. The purpose of granting restricted stock awards is to
encourage ownership and retention of our senior management and business decisions that may drive stock price appreciation. Recognizing that our business is subject to significant fluctuations in
commodity prices that may cause the market value of our common stock to fluctuate, we also intend the awards to provide an incentive for senior management to remain with us throughout commodity price
and business cycles.
Restricted
stock awards generally vest one-third annually after the original award date. Future vesting requirements impose limitations on the recipient, such that they do not become
unconditionally entitled to retain any of the shares of restricted stock subject to vesting until the applicable vesting date, subject to certain exceptions related to termination of employment. Any
unvested restricted stock awards generally are forfeited if the executive terminates employment with us. In certain instances, however, restricted stock awards may vest on an accelerated basis, such
as in the event of the executive's employment is terminated by us without cause or by the executive with good reason, in the event that the executive terminates his employment within a certain period
following a transaction that effects a change in the control of our Company, or in the event of the executive's death or disability while employed by us. Under these circumstances all restricted stock
awards held by the executive may automatically vest in accordance with the terms outlined in the restricted stock award agreement or the employment agreement, if applicable. The employment agreements
that we have entered into with the named executive officers provide for all restricted stock awards held by an executive to automatically vest in the event his employment is terminated by us without
cause or by the executive with good reason.
The
restricted stock grants to the named executive officers during fiscal year 2018 are shown below in the table entitled "
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in
2018
."
We do not maintain a defined benefit pension plan or retiree medical program that covers members of senior management. Retirement benefits to
our senior management, including the named executive officers, are currently provided principally through a tax-qualified profit sharing and 401(k) plan (our "Savings Plan"), in which eligible
salaried employees may participate. Pursuant to the Savings Plan, employees may elect to reduce their current annual compensation up to the lesser of
75% or the statutorily prescribed limit of $18,500 in calendar year 2018, plus up to an additional $6,000 in the form of "catch-up" contributions for participants age 50 and above, and have the amount
of any reduction contributed to the Savings Plan. Our Savings Plan is intended to qualify under sections 401(a) and 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), so that
contributions by us or our employees to the Savings Plan and income earned on contributions are not taxable to employees until withdrawn from the Savings Plan and so that contributions will be
deductible by us when made. We match 100% of the amount an employee contributes to the Savings Plan, subject to a 10% maximum based on the employee's compensation as defined in the Savings Plan.
Members of senior management participate in the Savings Plan on the same basis as other eligible employees.
The
Savings Plan provides for various investment options, for which the participant has sole discretion in determining how both the employer and employee contributions are invested. The
independent trustee of the Savings Plan then invests the assets of the Savings Plan as directed by participants. The Savings Plan does not provide our employees the option to invest directly in our
securities. The Savings Plan offers in-service withdrawals in the form of after-tax account distributions and age 59.5 distributions. We believe that the Savings Plan supports the objectives of our
compensation structure, including the ability to recruit and retain senior and experienced mid- to late-career executive talent for critical positions within our organization.
32
Table of Contents
The following tables represent outstanding equity awards under the Plan as of December 31, 2018. We do not issue awards under any other
plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of Outstanding
Options(#)
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options
|
|
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
7,468,926
|
|
$
|
8.34
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities to be
Issued Upon Vesting(#)
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
2,272,893
|
|
As
of December 31, 2018, a total of 4,909,331 shares were available for future grants under the Plan. As of March 22, 2019, approximately 1,033,948 shares of our common
stock are available for future grants under the Plan.
Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change-in-Control Arrangements
We have employment agreements with each member of our senior management, including the named executive officers. Strong competition for
management talent and uncertainty generated by our stated willingness to embrace consolidation trends in our industry led us to conclude that it was appropriate and in our best interests to enter into
such employment agreements. Our independent compensation consultant advised our Compensation Committee regarding the form of the employment agreement used for senior management.
Until his resignation in 2019, Mr. Wilson's employment agreement was for a term of two years, expiring on June 1, 2020. The term
of employment of each of our other named executive officers is one year, with automatic one-year extensions unless either party provides written notice thirty days prior to expiration of the initial
term or any extension. Our failure to renew an executive's employment agreement is considered a termination without cause under each employment agreement.
The salary payable to each of the named executive officers during 2018 is the amount set forth under the column entitled
"
2018 Base Salary
" in the Summary Compensation Table above. The salary of each named executive officer is subject to periodic review and
may be increased from time to time by the Compensation Committee and our board. Each named executive officer is eligible to receive performance based bonuses, grants of stock options, restricted stock
or other equity awards as determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee and our board. Each of the named executive officers is also entitled to reimbursement for reasonable business
expenses and to participate in our life, health, and dental insurance programs, and all other employee benefit plans which we may, from time to time, make available. We provide limited tax gross-ups
for life insurance, parking and country club memberships and certain other benefits.
Mr. Wilson
was entitled under his employment agreement to receive a vehicle allowance and reimbursement for reasonable fees and membership dues for one Houston area country club.
Mr. Mize was entitled under his employment agreement to be reimbursed for reasonable fees and membership dues for one Houston area country club.
33
Table of Contents
Our
use of expense reimbursement and perquisites as an element of compensation is limited. We do not view these items as a significant element of our compensation structure but do
believe that they can be used in conjunction with base salary to recruit, motivate and retain executive talent in a competitive environment. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews these items
provided to determine if they are appropriate and if any adjustments are warranted.
We may terminate each named executive officer's employment upon disability, and at any time for cause or without cause. Each named executive
officer may terminate his or her employment at any time, and such termination will be deemed to be with "good reason" if it is based on a material reduction in base salary; a material reduction in
authority, responsibilities or duties or those of the supervisor to whom the named executive officer reports; a material reduction in the
budget over which the named executive officer retains authority; a permanent relocation of the named executive officer's principal place of employment to any location outside a fifty mile radius of
the location from which named executive officer provides services to the Company; or any uncured material breaches of the employment agreement by us. If the employment of any of the named executive
officers is terminated by death or disability, such named executive officer (or his or her personal representative in the event of death) is entitled to receive accrued unpaid base compensation, plus
an optional bonus to be determined by the Compensation Committee, and all stock options and other incentive awards held by the named executive officer will become fully vested and immediately
exercisable, and all restrictions on any shares of restricted stock will be removed. If the employment of any of the named executive officers is terminated by us for cause, such named executive
officer (or his or her personal representative in the event of death) is entitled to receive accrued unpaid base compensation.
If
the employment of any named executive officer is terminated by us without cause or by such named executive officer with good reason, and such termination is not within two years after
a change in control, such named executive officer will be entitled to the accrued portion of unpaid salary, payment of the greater of a prorated amount of the named executive officer's target bonus
for the year in which the termination occurs or a bonus for such year as may be determined by our Compensation Committee in its sole discretion, a severance payment equal to one year's base salary
plus the higher of the current year target bonus or the bonus paid for the preceding year, payment of the premiums for medical, vision and dental insurance for the executive and his or her dependents
for up to one year following termination, and the full vesting of all unvested options and all restrictions removed from shares of restricted stock.
If
such named executive officer is terminated by us without cause or such named executive officer terminates his or her employment with the Company
with or
without
good reason, and such termination is within two years after a change in control, such named executive officer will be entitled to receive the accrued portion of unpaid
salary, payment of the greater of a prorated amount of the named executive officer's target bonus for the year in which the termination occurs or a bonus for such year as may be determined by our
Compensation Committee in its sole discretion, a severance payment equal to a multiple (which varies by individual) of base salary plus the higher of the current year target bonus or the bonus paid
for the year prior to termination or the year in which the change of control occurred, payment of the premiums for medical, vision and dental insurance for the executive and his or her dependents for
up to eighteen months following termination, and the full vesting of all unvested options and all restrictions removed from shares of restricted stock. The multiplier for Mr. Wilson is 3.0, for
Messrs. Herod, Mize and Elkouri it is 2.5, and for Mr. Wright it is 2.0. In addition, if a bonus for the named executive officer for the year immediately preceding the termination has
been determined but not paid as of the date of termination, the named executive officer will be paid the bonus so determined; and if such a bonus has not been determined, then the named executive
officer will be paid a bonus equal to the greater of such named executive officer's target bonus for such year, or for the year in which the termination occurs or the change of control occurs, or the
bonus paid to executive for the year immediately preceding
34
Table of Contents
the
year in which the change of control occurs. If the employment of such named executive officer is terminated by such named executive officer without good reason and not within two years after a
change in control, such named executive officer is entitled to receive accrued unpaid base compensation.
The
employment agreements with the named executive officers generally define a change of control to mean any of the following events:
-
-
any person or group becomes the "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of more
than 35% of the total voting power of our outstanding voting stock;
-
-
our merger with or consolidation into another entity and, immediately after giving effect to the merger or consolidation, one or both of the
following occurs: (a) less than 50% of the total voting power of the outstanding voting stock of the surviving or resulting entity is then "beneficially owned" in the aggregate by our
stockholders immediately prior to such merger or consolidation, or (b) the individuals who were members of our board of directors immediately prior to the execution of the agreement providing
for the merger or consolidation do not constitute at least a majority of the members of the board of directors of the surviving or resulting entity;
-
-
we sell, assign, convey, transfer, lease or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets to a third party in one transaction or
a series of related transactions;
-
-
individuals who constitute our board of directors cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of our board of directors unless such
persons were elected, appointed or nominated by a vote of at least a majority of our incumbent directors; or
-
-
the complete liquidation or dissolution of our Company.
In
our view, having the change of control and severance protections helps to maintain the named executive officer's objectivity in decision-making and provides another vehicle to align
the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our stockholders. The disposition of our Williston Basin oil and natural gas properties in September 2017 constituted a sale of
substantially all of our assets and, therefore, a change of control under the terms of our employment agreements with senior management.
The
following table sets forth the estimated amounts that would be payable to each of the named executive officers upon a termination under the scenarios outlined above, excluding
termination for cause or on account of death or disability, assuming that such termination occurred on December 31, 2018 and using the closing price of our common stock at December 31,
2018 for purposes of the calculations as required by the SEC. The dollar amounts set forth under the column heading "
Early Vesting of Restricted
Stock/Options
" correspond to the amounts that would be paid, in addition to accrued and unpaid salary through the date of death or disability, in the event of the death or
disability at year-end of each of the
35
Table of Contents
executives.
There can be no assurance that these scenarios would produce the same or similar results as those disclosed if a termination occurs in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
Payment(1)
|
|
Early Vesting of
Restricted Stock/
Options(2)
|
|
Other(3)
|
|
Total
|
|
Without Cause/For Good Reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floyd C. Wilson
|
|
$
|
1,600,000
|
|
$
|
425,221
|
|
$
|
36,784
|
|
$
|
2,062,005
|
|
Stephen W. Herod
|
|
$
|
900,000
|
|
$
|
199,325
|
|
$
|
36,784
|
|
$
|
1,136,109
|
|
Mark J. Mize
|
|
$
|
800,000
|
|
$
|
177,174
|
|
$
|
36,784
|
|
$
|
1,013,958
|
|
David S. Elkouri
|
|
$
|
800,000
|
|
$
|
177,174
|
|
$
|
24,925
|
|
$
|
1,002,099
|
|
Jon C. Wright
|
|
$
|
850,000
|
|
$
|
177,174
|
|
$
|
36,784
|
|
$
|
1,063,958
|
|
Following Change of Control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floyd C. Wilson(4)
|
|
$
|
4,800,000
|
|
$
|
425,221
|
|
$
|
55,177
|
|
$
|
5,280,398
|
|
Stephen W. Herod(4)
|
|
$
|
2,250,000
|
|
$
|
199,325
|
|
$
|
55,177
|
|
$
|
2,504,502
|
|
Mark J. Mize(4)
|
|
$
|
2,000,000
|
|
$
|
177,174
|
|
$
|
55,177
|
|
$
|
2,232,351
|
|
David S. Elkouri
|
|
$
|
2,000,000
|
|
$
|
177,174
|
|
$
|
37,388
|
|
$
|
2,214,562
|
|
Jon C. Wright
|
|
$
|
1,700,000
|
|
$
|
177,174
|
|
$
|
55,177
|
|
$
|
1,932,351
|
|
-
(1)
-
Represents
total annual cash compensation (2018 base salary plus target bonus, which is 100% of base salary for each officer, in accordance with the terms of the
employment agreement), which, in the event of a change of control, has been multiplied by the applicable multiplier set forth in each officer's employment agreement.
-
(2)
-
The
value of unvested restricted stock and stock options that would vest under each termination scenario is based on the closing price of our common stock on
December 31, 2018.
-
(3)
-
Represents
an estimate of health insurance benefits to be provided to the named executive officer and each eligible dependent under each of the scenarios based on
actual insurance amounts paid out in 2018.
-
(4)
-
Messrs. Wilson,
Herod and Mize resigned their employment with the Company in early 2019, which as noted previously, was treated as a termination without
"Cause" by the Company under their respective employment agreements. Also, as noted above, the sale of substantially all of the Company's assets during 2017 was a change of control under the
employment agreements of each of our named executive officers, including Messrs. Wilson, Herod and Mize. Accordingly, upon termination of the employment of each of Messrs. Wilson, Herod
and Mize, each received severance payments in accordance with his respective employment agreement, together with early vesting of restricted stock and stock options and access to health insurance
benefits provided therein.
We have entered into an indemnity agreement with each of our non-employee directors and Messrs. Wilson and Mize. These agreements provide
for us to, among other things, indemnify such persons against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or officers, to advance their expenses incurred as a
result of a proceeding as to which they may be indemnified and to cover such person under any directors' and officers' liability insurance policy we choose, in our discretion, to maintain. These
indemnity agreements are intended to provide indemnification rights to the fullest extent permitted under applicable indemnification rights statutes in the State of Delaware and are in addition to any
other rights such person may have under our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and applicable law. We believe these indemnity agreements enhance
our ability to recruit and retain knowledgeable and experienced executives and independent, non-management directors.
36
Table of Contents
We believe that it is in our best interest to pay compensation consistent with our compensation philosophies and objectives, even if it results
in the non-deductibility of some compensation under the Code. Accordingly, deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code has not influenced our compensation decisions. Further, recent tax law
changes to Section 162(m) of the Code have expanded the limitations on the deductibility of compensation in excess of $1 million paid to certain executives to include our chief financial
officer, as well as our chief executive officer and our three next most highly compensated executive officers, as well as eliminating the exception previously available for certain performance-based
compensation.
Our success depends substantially on the performance of our executive officers and other key employees. The loss of any member of the senior
management team or other key employees could negatively affect our ability to execute our business strategy. Our responsibility is to implement compensation programs that attract and retain the
management talent necessary for the Company execute its business plans and grow stockholder value.
At
the 2017 annual meeting of our stockholders, we asked our stockholders to approve, in an advisory vote, the compensation of our named executive officers. Our stockholders broadly
endorsed the compensation of our named executive officers, with approval by 83.5% of the votes cast on our "Say on Pay" proposal (excluding broker non-votes and abstentions). Further, also at our 2017
annual meeting, we asked stockholders to vote on the frequency with which we should hold a vote on Say on Pay. Our stockholders endorsed by roughly the same margin, 81.2%, holding a vote once every
three years. Accordingly, our next Say on Pay vote proposal for stockholders will be at our annual shareholders meeting in 2020. Nonetheless, we engage in regular discussions with our stockholders on
many aspects of our business, and to the extent that during those discussions we receive stockholder feedback on our
compensation practices, our Compensation Committee takes that feedback into account, along with the advice and guidance of our independent compensation consultants, as our Compensation Committee
endeavors to ensure that our executive compensation programs are consistent with our objective of ensuring we are able to recruit, motivate and retain the executive talent required to successfully
manage and grow our business.
The following chart illustrates the difference between reported compensation in the Summary Compensation Table and the CEO's total realized
compensation for the same time periods. The lower realized compensation value demonstrates our programs' responsiveness to changes in our share price, and is a result of a number of factors including
below-target performance driving reduced bonus payouts and lower realized value on equity awards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
Year
|
|
As
Reported
|
|
Realized
|
|
As
Reported
|
|
Realized
|
|
As
Reported
|
|
Realized
|
|
Salary
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
$
|
800,000
|
|
$
|
800,000
|
|
$
|
800,000
|
|
$
|
800,000
|
|
Bonus
|
|
$
|
3,275,000
|
|
$
|
3,275,000
|
|
$
|
1,400,000
|
|
$
|
1,400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
$
|
8,604,750
|
|
$
|
4,351,195
|
|
$
|
2,405,716
|
|
$
|
4,842,490
|
|
$
|
1,413,235
|
|
|
|
|
Options/SAR Awards
|
|
$
|
11,463,436
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,721,241
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
706,243
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Compensation
|
|
$
|
31,510
|
|
$
|
31,510
|
|
$
|
26,536
|
|
$
|
26,536
|
|
$
|
27,338
|
|
$
|
27,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
24,124,696
|
|
$
|
8,407,705
|
|
$
|
7,353,493
|
|
$
|
7,069,026
|
|
$
|
2,946,816
|
|
$
|
827,338
|
|
37
Table of Contents
Reported Compensation:
Salary, bonus earned, and target long-term incentive grants as disclosed in the Summary Compensation
Table.
Realized Compensation:
Salary, bonus earned, value of restricted stock vesting and option values based on inputed gain upon
exercise (if any) during each year.
38
Table of Contents
Summary Compensation Table
The table below sets forth information regarding compensation for our named executive officers for the years indicated (commencing with the
first year in which such officer became one of our named executive officers):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary(1)
|
|
Bonus(2)
|
|
Stock
Awards(3)
|
|
Option/SAR
Awards(3)
|
|
All Other
Compensation(4)
|
|
Total
|
|
Floyd C. Wilson
|
|
|
2018
|
|
$
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,413,235
|
|
$
|
706,243
|
|
$
|
27,338
|
|
$
|
2,946,816
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Chief
|
|
|
2017
|
|
$
|
800,000
|
|
$
|
1,400,000
|
|
$
|
2,405,716
|
|
$
|
2,721,241
|
|
$
|
26,536
|
|
$
|
7,353,493
|
|
Executive Officer and
|
|
|
2016
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
$
|
3,275,000
|
|
$
|
8,604,750
|
|
$
|
11,463,436
|
|
$
|
31,510
|
|
$
|
24,124,696
|
|
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen W. Herod
|
|
|
2018
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
662,463
|
|
$
|
331,042
|
|
$
|
26,234
|
|
$
|
1,469,739
|
|
Executive Vice President,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
$
|
787,500
|
|
$
|
629,688
|
|
$
|
712,269
|
|
$
|
26,536
|
|
$
|
2,605,993
|
|
Corporate Development
|
|
|
2016
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
$
|
965,000
|
|
$
|
2,252,250
|
|
$
|
3,000,497
|
|
$
|
31,510
|
|
$
|
6,699,257
|
|
Mark J. Mize
|
|
|
2018
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
588,843
|
|
$
|
294,195
|
|
$
|
46,595
|
|
$
|
1,329,633
|
|
Executive Vice President,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
$
|
600,000
|
|
$
|
629,688
|
|
$
|
712,269
|
|
$
|
41,938
|
|
$
|
2.383,895
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and
|
|
|
2016
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
$
|
946,667
|
|
$
|
2,252,250
|
|
$
|
3,000,497
|
|
$
|
38,461
|
|
$
|
6,637,875
|
|
Treasurer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David S. Elkouri
|
|
|
2018
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
$
|
588,843
|
|
$
|
294,195
|
|
$
|
131,848
|
|
$
|
1,514,886
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
|
2017
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
$
|
700,000
|
|
$
|
629,688
|
|
$
|
712,269
|
|
$
|
26,536
|
|
$
|
2,468,493
|
|
and Chief Legal Officer
|
|
|
2016
|
|
$
|
375,000
|
|
$
|
937,500
|
|
$
|
2,252,250
|
|
$
|
3,000,497
|
|
$
|
31,510
|
|
$
|
6,596,757
|
|
Jon C. Wright
|
|
|
2018
|
|
$
|
425,000
|
|
$
|
106,250
|
|
$
|
588,843
|
|
$
|
294,195
|
|
$
|
19,160
|
|
$
|
1,433,448
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
|
2017
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
$
|
700,000
|
|
$
|
516,669
|
|
$
|
584,425
|
|
$
|
18,648
|
|
$
|
2,219,742
|
|
and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
(1)
-
Represents
actual base salary paid in the year.
-
(2)
-
Represents
an annual cash incentive bonus paid subsequent to year end for prior year performance, and with respect to 2016, a retention bonus paid in 2016 in
connection with our reorganization.
-
(3)
-
Represents
the grant date fair value of awards granted during the indicated year, as determined in accordance with ASC Topic 718. Please see the discussion of the
assumptions made in the valuation of these awards in "
Note 12Stockholders' Equity
" to the audited consolidated financial statements
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. See "
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2018
" for information
on awards made in 2018. Generally, the full grant date fair value is the amount that we would expense in our financial statements over the award's vesting schedule. These amounts reflect our
accounting expense, and do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the named executive officers.
-
(4)
-
For
2018, the amounts reported for "
All Other Compensation
" include amounts provided to the named executive officers as
outlined in the table below, with respect to (a) the matching contribution that we make on account of employee contributions under our 401(k) Savings Plan, (b) premiums paid by the
Company for executive long-term disability insurance, (c) tax gross-ups for life insurance, parking payments, relocation stipends and country club memberships, (d) relocation stipend for
Mr. Elkouri, and (e) country club membership paid by the Company for Mr. Mize.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Compensation
($)
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
|
(e)
|
|
Named Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floyd C. Wilson
|
|
|
24,500
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
2,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen W. Herod
|
|
|
24,500
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark J. Mize
|
|
|
18,500
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,361
|
|
David S. Elkouri
|
|
|
24,500
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
31,700
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
Jon C. Wright
|
|
|
18,500
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
Table of Contents
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2018
The table below sets forth information regarding grants of plan-based awards made to our named executive officers during 2018.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise or
Base Price
of Option
Awards ($/Sh)(3)
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
Threshold(1)
|
|
Target(#)
|
|
Maximum (#)(1)
|
|
Type of
Award(2)
|
|
Floyd C. Wilson
|
|
|
3/1/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
241,500
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
$
|
5.65
|
|
$
|
706,249
|
|
|
|
|
3/1/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,130
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,413,235
|
|
Stephen W. Herod
|
|
|
3/1/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,200
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
$
|
5.65
|
|
$
|
331,045
|
|
|
|
|
3/1/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,250
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
662,463
|
|
Mark J. Mize
|
|
|
3/1/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,600
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
$
|
5.65
|
|
$
|
294,197
|
|
|
|
|
3/1/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,220
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
588,843
|
|
David S. Elkouri
|
|
|
3/1/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,600
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
$
|
5.65
|
|
$
|
294,197
|
|
|
|
|
3/1/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,220
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
588,843
|
|
Jon C. Wright
|
|
|
3/1/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,600
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
$
|
5.65
|
|
$
|
294,197
|
|
|
|
|
3/1/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,220
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
588,843
|
|
-
(1)
-
Awards
granted under the Plan provide only for a single estimated payout. Under the Plan there are no minimum amounts payable for a certain level of performance and
there are no maximum payouts possible above the target. Thus, there are no thresholds or maximums (or equivalent items) applicable to these awards.
-
(2)
-
Represents
shares of restricted stock and stock options issued under the Plan. The shares of restricted stock and stock options vest in three equal installments on
each anniversary of the date of grant, beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant, in each case, provided that the recipient has been continuously employed at such date.
-
(3)
-
The
exercise price of each award is equal to the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant.
-
(4)
-
Represents
the full grant date fair value determined in accordance with ASC Topic 718. Please see the discussion of the assumptions made in the valuation of these
awards in "
Note 12Stockholders' Equity
" to the audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. Generally, the full grant date fair value is the amount that we would expense in our financial statements over the award's vesting
schedule. These amounts reflect our accounting expense, and do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the named executive officers.
40
Table of Contents
Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2018
The following table summarizes the number of securities underlying outstanding plan awards for each named executive officer as of
December 31, 2018.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares,
Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units Or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable(1)
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
|
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested(1)
|
|
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested(2)
|
|
Floyd C. Wilson
|
|
|
1,241,666
|
|
|
620,834
|
|
$
|
9.24
|
|
|
9/12/2026
|
|
|
250,130
|
|
$
|
425,221
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,945
|
|
|
413,890
|
|
$
|
7.75
|
|
|
4/11/2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241,500
|
|
$
|
5.65
|
|
|
3/1/2028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen W. Herod
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
|
162,500
|
|
$
|
9.24
|
|
|
9/12/2026
|
|
|
117,250
|
|
$
|
199,325
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,166
|
|
|
108,334
|
|
$
|
7.75
|
|
|
4/11/2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,200
|
|
$
|
5.65
|
|
|
3/1/2028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark J. Mize
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
|
162,500
|
|
$
|
9.24
|
|
|
9/12/2026
|
|
|
104,220
|
|
$
|
177,174
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,166
|
|
|
108,334
|
|
$
|
7.75
|
|
|
4/11/2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,600
|
|
$
|
5.65
|
|
|
3/1/2028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David S. Elkouri
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
|
162,500
|
|
$
|
9.24
|
|
|
9/12/2026
|
|
|
104,220
|
|
$
|
177,174
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,166
|
|
|
108,334
|
|
$
|
7.75
|
|
|
4/11/2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,600
|
|
$
|
5.65
|
|
|
3/1/2028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jon C. Wright
|
|
|
266,666
|
|
|
133,334
|
|
$
|
9.24
|
|
|
9/12/2026
|
|
|
104,220
|
|
$
|
177,174
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,444
|
|
|
88,889
|
|
$
|
7.75
|
|
|
4/11/2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,600
|
|
$
|
5.65
|
|
|
3/1/2028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
(1)
-
The
shares of restricted stock and stock options vest in three equal installments on each anniversary of the date of grant, beginning on the first anniversary of the
date of grant, in each case, provided that the recipient has been continuously employed at such date.
-
(2)
-
Calculated
based upon the closing market price of our common stock as of December 31, 2018, the last trading day of our 2018 fiscal year ($1.70) multiplied by
the number of unvested awards at year end.
Compensation Adjustments Subsequent to Fiscal Year End
Subsequent to December 31, 2018, as part of the analysis of executive compensation that is undertaken annually by our Compensation
Committee, we granted awards to certain named executive officers of long-term equity incentives under the Plan. These incentives were in the form of grants of restricted stock. The restricted stock
grants vest in three equal annual increments beginning on the first
41
Table of Contents
anniversary
of the grant date. We did not adjust base salaries or award any stock options to the named executive officers. Base salaries and equity awards are reflected in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Salary
Increase
|
|
2019
Base Salary
|
|
Stock
Option
Award(#)
|
|
Restricted
Stock
Award(#)
|
|
Floyd C. Wilson
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen W. Herod
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark J. Mize
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David S. Elkouri
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
201,160
|
|
Jon C. Wright
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
425,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
186,710
|
|
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
No stock options were exercised during 2018 and no shares of restricted stock vested during 2018.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth certain information as of December 31, 2018 with respect to compensation plans (including individual
compensation arrangements) under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
Number of
Securities
to be Issued
Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options and
Rights(A)
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price of
Outstanding
Options and
Rights
|
|
Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available
for Future
Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation
Plans
(Excluding
Securities
Reflected in
Column(A))
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders(1)
|
|
|
9,741,819
|
(2)
|
$
|
8.34
|
|
|
4,909,331
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
9,741,819
|
(2)
|
$
|
8.34
|
|
|
4,909,331
|
|
-
(1)
-
Represents
information for the Plan.
-
(2)
-
Includes
2,272,893 shares of restricted stock not yet vested.
Stock Ownership Guidelines Policy
Our board of directors has adopted an Amended and Restated Stock Ownership Guidelines Policy (the "Policy") applicable to our board of
directors, chief executive officer and president and each executive vice president to ensure that they maintain a meaningful economic stake in the Company. The Policy is designed to maintain stock
ownership of our directors and the specified officers at a significant level so as to further align their interests with the interests of our stockholders in value creation. Subject to certain
exceptions contained in the Policy, our directors are required to hold a number of shares of our common stock valued at three times (3x) the annual cash retainer paid to them by the Company, our chief
executive officer and president is required to hold a number of shares of our common stock valued at six times (6x) the base salary paid to him by the Company and the other specified officers are
required to hold a number of shares of our common stock valued at three times (3x) the base salaries paid to them by the Company. For purposes of calculating the value of shares owned, each share of
stock shall have a deemed value equal to the greater of the price at acquisition or the current market value. For purposes of calculating the value
42
Table of Contents
of
unvested restricted shares, the value shall be determined without giving effect to the restriction. Subject to certain exceptions contained in the Policy, all of the Company's directors and
executive officers are in compliance with the Policy.
Pay Ratio Disclosure
As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of
Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of Mr. Wilson, our
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President during 2018, our last completed fiscal year:
-
-
the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of the Company (other than Mr. Wilson) was $190,387; and
-
-
the annual total compensation of Mr. Wilson was $2,946,816.
Based
on this information, for 2018 the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Wilson to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was 15 to 1.
To
identify the median of the total annual compensation of all our employees, we utilized a determination date of December 31, 2018, a date within the last three months of the
2018 fiscal year. For purposes of reporting annual total compensation and the ratio of annual total compensation of Mr. Wilson to the median employee, both Mr. Wilson and the median
employee's annual total compensation were calculated consistent with the disclosure requirements of executive compensation under Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K.